alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Common-Cause Failure Database and AnalysisSystem: Event Data Collection, Classification, and Coding (NUREG/CR-6268, INEL/EXT-07-12969, Revision 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6268, Revision 1 (PDF - 6.64 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**August 2007**Date Published:**September 2007

**Prepared by:** T.E. Wierman/INL D.M. Rasmuson/NRC A. Mosleh/Univ. of MD

Risk & Reliability Assessment Department Idaho National Laboratory P.O. Box 1625 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415-3850 Operated by Battelle Energy Alliance for the U.S. Department of Energy

Department of Materials and Nuclear Engineering University of Maryland College Park, Maryland 20742-2115

A.D. Salomon, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Risk Assessment and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001 

NRC Job Code Y6546

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report on the Common-Cause Failure Database and Analysis System presents an overview of common-cause failure (CCF) analysis methods for use in the U.S. commercial nuclear power industry. Idaho National Laboratory staff identify equipment failures that contribute to CCF events through searches of Licensee Event Reports, Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System failure reports, and Equipment Performance and Information Exchange failure reports. The staff then enter the event information into a personal computer-based data analysis system (CCF system). This report summarizes how data are gathered, evaluated, and coded into the CCF system, and describes the process for using the data to estimate probabilistic risk assessment common-cause failure parameters.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of issuance of advisory circular. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the issuance of Advisory Circular (AC) 33.27-1, Turbine Rotor Strength Requirements of 14 CFR 33.27. This AC sets forth acceptable methods of compliance with the provisions of the rotor strength (overspeed) requirements of 14 CFR 33.27.

      ( print page 61068)    

# DATES:

Advisory Circular 33.27-1 was issued by the Engine and Propeller Directorate, ANE-110, on September 27, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The Federal Aviation Administration, Attn: Timoleon Mouzakis, Engine and Propeller Standards Staff, ANE-110, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone: (781) 238-7114; fax: (781) 238-7199; e-mail:                         *Timoleon.Mouzakis@faa.gov.*

We have filed in the docket all substantive comments received, and a report summarizing them. If you wish to review the docket in person, you may go to the above address between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you wish to contact the above individual directly, you can use the above telephone number or e-mail address provided.

*How To Obtain Copies:*                         A paper copy of AC 33.27-1 may be obtained by writing to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Subsequent Distribution Office, DOT Warehouse, SVC-121.23, Ardmore East Business Center, 3341Q 75th Ave., Landover, MD 20785, telephone 301-322-5377, or by faxing your request to the warehouse at 301-386-5394. The AC will also be available on the Internet at                         *“http://www.faa.gov/​”*, select “Regulations and Policies” and the link titled “Advisory Circulars”.                    

(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701-44702, 44704.)

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts on September 27, 2004.

Francis A. Favara,

Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 04-23072 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

STEVEN JONES JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 228 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
(No. 37261.

#### The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, *vs.*Robert Scott, Plaintiff in Error.

*Opinion filed May*27, *1963.*

William C. Starke, of Chicago, (Howard T. Savage, of counsel,) for plaintiff in error.

William G. Clark, Attorney General, of Springfield, and Daniel P. Ward, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Fred G. Leach and E. Michael O’Brien, Assistant Attorneys General, and Edward J. Hladis and Matthew J. Moran, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel,) for the People.

Mr. Justice House

delivered the opinion of the court:

Robert Scott was indicted in the criminal court of Cook County for the crime of robbery. A jury found him guilty and the court sentenced him to the penitentiary for a term of not less than 20 years nor more than 25 years. A writ of error has been issued to review the conviction.

It is argued that the trial court refused to permit the jury to hear evidence of offers of leniency which were made by the police to defendant in order to obtain his confession which was admitted in evidence. The record contains an offer of proof that defendant would testify that police officers Toney, Williams, Monz, Kaiser and Demko stated to defendant at different times and in relays that the com*132plainant Louise Dogan was an employee of approximately 15 years in the State’s Attorney’s office and that if he would sign a statement in order to clear up the case, all of the aforementioned officers would see that the case was dropped or that he would receive probation. This offer was refused by the court. The record also shows repeated efforts by defendant to get before the jury evidence of promises of leniency. Objection to these efforts was sustained and the remarks stricken.

Although a confession has been admitted in evidence, the defendant still has the right to present evidence to the jury which affects the credibility or weight to be given the confession. *(People*v. *Schwartz,*3 Ill.2d 520.) The alleged promises of leniency were material and relevant to the credibility to be given the confession and the court erred in excluding evidence of such promises.

The judgment of the criminal court of Cook County is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

*Reversed and remanded.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND
WITHIN THIS FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                          20,041
<SECURITIES>                                    12,725
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,050
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,516)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,475
<PP&E>                                          12,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,428)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,767
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           250
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,207
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,690
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,455
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                56,245
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   458
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  31
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,023
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,644)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,667
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,667
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1655.21 Loan fee.

The TSP will charge a participant a $50.00 loan fee when it disburses a general purpose loan and a $100.00 loan fee when it disburses a residential loan and will deduct the applicable fee from the proceeds of the loan.

[87 FR 31695, May 24, 2022]
#### FREUDENBERG-NOK GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BASF CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-1215.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 16, 2002.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

*873ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).
### **CHAPTER 43—NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONED OFFICER CORPS**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec.
3001.
Commissioned officer corps.
3002.
Definitions.
3003.
Authorized number on the active list.
3004.
Strength and distribution in grade.
3005.
Number of authorized commissioned officers.
3006.
Obligated service requirement.
3007.
Training and physical fitness.
3008.
Aviation accession training programs.
3009.
Use of recruiting materials for public relations.
3010.
Awards and decorations.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—APPOINTMENT AND PROMOTION OF OFFICERS

3021.
Original appointments and reappointments.
3022.
Personnel boards.
3023.
Separation of ensigns found not fully qualified.
3024.
Promotion by selection to permanent grades above lieutenant (junior grade).
3025.
Length of service for promotion purposes.
3026.
Appointments and promotions to permanent grades.
3027.
General qualification of officers for promotion to higher permanent grade.
3028.
Positions of importance and responsibility.
3029.
Temporary appointments.
3030.
Temporary appointment or advancement of commissioned officers in time of war or national emergency.
3031.
Pay and allowances; date of acceptance of promotion.
3032.
Service credit as deck officer or junior engineer for promotion purposes.
3033.
Suspension during war or emergency.
3034.
Officer candidates.
3035.
Procurement of personnel.
3036.
Career flexibility to enhance retention of officers.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—SEPARATION AND RETIREMENT OF OFFICERS

3041.
Involuntary retirement or separation.
3042.
Separation pay.
3043.
Mandatory retirement for age.
3044.
Retirement for length of service.
3045.
Computation of retired pay.
3046.
Retired grade and retired pay.
3047.
Retired rank and pay held pursuant to other laws unaffected.
3048.
Continuation on active duty; deferral of retirement.
3049.
Recall to active duty.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—SERVICE OF OFFICERS WITH THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS

3061.
Cooperation with and transfer to military departments.
3062.
Relative rank of officers when serving with Army, Navy, or Air Force.
3063.
Rules and regulations when cooperating with military departments.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—RIGHTS AND BENEFITS

3071.
Applicability of certain provisions of title 10.
3071a.
Applicability of certain provisions of title 37.
3072.
Eligibility for veterans benefits and other rights, privileges, immunities, and benefits under certain provisions of law.
3073.
Medical and dental care.
3074.
Commissary privileges.
3075.
Authority to use appropriated funds for transportation and reimbursement of certain items.
3076.
Presentation of United States flag upon retirement.
3077.
Education loan repayment program.
3078.
Interest payment program.
3079.
Student pre-commissioning education assistance program.
3079–1.
Limitation on educational assistance.
3079a.
Treatment of commission in commissioned officer corps as employment in Administration for purposes of certain hiring decisions.
3079b.
Shore leave for professional mariners.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Jeffrey P. Lucas, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of eMagin Corporation.

 

2.      Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this report;

 

 
| Dated: April 30,   2019 |   | By:    | /s/ Jeffrey P. Lucas                                                              |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |   |   | Jeffrey P. Lucas                                                                  |
|                              |   |   | President and Chief   Financial Officer        |
|                              |   |   | (Principal Accounting   and Financial Officer)                                    |

 

----
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09671**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  09671\09671_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09671\09671_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09671\09671_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09671\09671_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09671\09671_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09671\09671_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

09671\Certification Statement Plant ID 09671.pdf Plant certification statement x 09671\Supplemental Documents\09671_Diagram D-1,POND-1 Ash Site Sedimentation Pond AES Cayuga LL.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09671\Supplemental Documents\09671_Diagram D-2,WWT-1 Process Water Reclamation Facility AES Cay.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09671\Supplemental Documents\09671_Diagram D-3,WWT-2 FGD Treatment System AES Cayuga LLC 09671.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 09671\Supplemental Documents\09671_MAP-1 Aerial Map AES Cayuga LLC 09671.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09671\Supplemental Documents\Emails\Steam electric questionnaire questions.rtf Follow-up correspondence regarding survey contents. x 09671\09671_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09671\09671_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 09671\09671_Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of eMagin Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew G. Sculley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








March 16, 2011
By:
/s/ Andrew G. SculleyAndrew G. SculleyChief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Ida W. McDonough, Deceased. In the Matter of the Estate of John J. McDonough, Deceased. Glen E. McDonough, Respondent; Cora A. Springer, as Executrix of John W. Springer, Deceased, who was Executor of Ida W. McDonough, Deceased, and who was Administrator De Bonis Non of the Estate of John J. McDonough, Deceased, Appellant.

First Department,

February 13, 1952.

*363*Monroe E. Stein*of counsel, for appellant.

*James F. Carero*of counsel *(Anderson <& Carero,*attorneys), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The petitions for a compulsory accounting should have been denied since such proceeding is barred by the ten-year Statute of Limitations. Petitioner had a clear right to compel an accounting when appellant Cora A. Springer was appointed by the Surrogate of Westchester County as the executrix of the estate of John W. Springer, her son. By virtue of sections 257 and 258 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, petitioner, who was then *sui juris,*could have applied to the Surrogate for a compulsory accounting from Cora A. Springer of the estate of her testator, John W. Springer, in administering the estates of Ida W. McDonough and John J. McDonough. Having failed to apply for such accounting within the period limited by law, this proceeding is now barred. In *Matter of Rogers*(153 N. Y. 316) the Court of Appeals held unequivocally that the right to compel an accounting from the personal representative of the deceased executor or administrator was barred absolutely by the Statute of Limitations after ten years had elapsed since the appointment of said personal representative.

The two orders of the Surrogate should be reversed, with costs, and the petitions denied, with costs.

Does, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Vooehis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Orders unanimously reversed, with costs, and the petitions denied, with costs. Settle order on notice.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMeasurement of heat-transfer coefficients in shock wave-turbulent boundary layer interaction regions with a multi-layered thin film heat transfer gaugeA thin film heat transfer gauge is applied to the measurement of heat transfer coefficients in the interaction regions of incident shock waves and fully developed turbulent boundary layers. It was developed to measure heat flux with high spatial resolution and fast response for wind tunnels with long flow duration. To measure the heat transfer coefficients in the interaction region in detail, experiments were performed under the conditions of Mach number = 4, total pressure = 1.2 MPa, 0.59 to approximately 0.65. Reynolds number = 1.3 to approximately 1.5 x 10 to the 7th power and incident shock angles from 17.8 to 22.8 degrees. The results show that the heat transfer coefficient changes complicatedly in the interaction region. At the beginning the interaction region, the heat transfer coefficient decreases at first, reaches its minimum value at the point where the pressure begins to increase, and then increases sharply. When the boundary layer begins to separate, even a small separation bubble causes significant changes in the heat transfer coefficient, while the pressure does not show any changes which suggests that the boundary layer begins to separate.Document ID19860012319Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsHayashi, M.*(NASA Headquarters Washington, DC United States)*Sakurai, A.*(NASA Headquarters Washington, DC United States)*Aso, S.*(NASA Headquarters Washington, DC United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1986Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:77958NASA-TM-77958Accession Number86N21790Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASW-3542Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860012319.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**LIST OF CONTROLLED ENTITIES AS OF APRIL29, 2003**

 

As of April 29, 2003 our listing of controlledentities is as follows: 

 

Barbeques Galore Limited 

*whose controlled entities are:*

 

Galore Group Nominees Pty Limited 

Vilbrent Pty Limited 

Barbeques Galore (Aust) Pty Limited 

*whose controlled entities are:*

 

Galore Pty Limited 

The Galore Group (International) Pty Limited 

*whose controlled entity is:*

 

The Galore Group (U.S.A.), Inc. 

*whose controlled entities are:*

 

Barbeques Galore, Inc. 

Barbeques Galore Online, Inc.**

 

Barbeques Galore Services Pty Limited 

*whose controlled entities are:*

 

Cook-on-Gas Products (Australia) Pty Limited 

*whose controlled entities are:*

 

Bosmana Pty Limited 

Cougar Leisure Products Pty Limited 

 

G.L.G. Australia Pty Limited 

*whose controlled entities are:*

 

Australian Enamellers Pty Limited 

Douglas Manufacturing Pty Limited 

Park-Tec Engineering Pty Limited 

 

Pricotech Leisure Brands Pty Limited 

Redgun Pty Limited 

 

GLG Trading Pte Limited 

 

(a):  All the abovementioned controlled entities are incorporated in Australia with the exception of: 

 

The Galore Group (U.S.A.), Inc; 

Barbeques Galore, Inc; and 

Barbeques Galore Online, Inc. 

 

which are incorporated in the United States of America; and 

 

GLG Trading Pte Limited 

 

which is incorporated in Singapore. 

 

(b):  All the abovementioned controlled entities have ordinary shares as issued share capital and are 100% owned.
#### 770-8th Ave. Corp., Respondent, v. Bessie Propper, Appellant.

*820Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-61776) pertaining to the AltaRex Corp. Stock Option Plan of our
report dated February 12, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of AltaRex Corp. for the year ended December 31, 1998 included in its
Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2000, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Chartered Accountants

Edmonton, Canada
June 22, 2001