alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In
connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Allan J. Kent,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for the periods presented.

















/s/ Allan
J. Kent


--------------------------




Allan J.
Kent


Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


June 26,
2008
§ 10101.102 Prior approval for outside employment. ( a ) *General Requirement.* Before engaging in compensated or uncompensated outside employment, all National Mediation Board employees must obtain written approval from the Board or its designee.
( b ) *Procedure for requesting approval.* ( 1 ) The approval by the Board or its designee shall be requested in writing in advance of engaging in outside employment.
( 2 ) Upon a significant change in the nature of scope of the outside employment or in the employee's official position, the employee shall submit a revised request for approval within 30 calendar days.
( c ) *Standard for approval.* ( 1 ) Approval shall be granted unless the Board or its designee determines that the outside employment is expected to involve conduct prohibited by statute or Federal regulation, including 5 CFR part 2635.
( 2 ) As part of the approval process, the Board or its designee shall provide the request to the Designated Agency Ethics Official (DAEO) in order for the employee to receive written ethics guidance. In the event, the DAEO is the Board's designee, the DAEO shall provide written ethics guidance upon receiving the request. This written ethics guidance shall be appended to the written approval.
( d ) *Definition of employment.* For purposes of this section, “employment” means any form of non-Federal employment or business relationship, compensated or uncompensated, involving the provision of personal services by the employee. It includes, but is not limited to personal services as an officer, director, employee, agent, attorney, consultant, contractor, general partner, trustee, teacher, or speaker. It includes writing when done under an arrangement with another person for production or publication of the written product. It does not, however, include participation in the activities of a nonprofit charitable, religious, professional, social, fraternal, educational, recreational, public service or civic organization, unless such activities are for compensation other than reimbursement of expenses; such activities involve the provision of professional services or advice; or the organization's activities are devoted substantially to matters relating to the employee's official duties as defined in 5 CFR 2635.807(a)(2)(i)(B) through (E).
### §301. Federal recognition of enlisted members

To be eligible for Federal recognition as an enlisted member of the National Guard, a person must have the qualifications prescribed by the Secretary concerned for the grade, branch, position, and type of unit or organization involved. He becomes federally recognized upon enlisting in a federally recognized unit or organization of the National Guard.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 601.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 301 | 50:1113(a) (as applicable to enlisted members). | July 9, 1952, ch. 608, §703(a) (as applicable to enlisted members), 66 Stat. 502. |
### §131. Repealed. Oct. 11, 1951, ch. 495, §5, 65 Stat. 407

Section, act Aug. 19, 1890, ch. 802, §1, 26 Stat. 328, related to local rules for harbors and inland waters.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 1954, see note set out under sections 61 to 63 of this title.
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-05-013 April 6, 2005

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO DISCUSS 2004 PERFORMANCE AT BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff are scheduled to meet with Progress Energy officials

on April 12 to discuss the NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at the Brunswick nuclear

power plant, located near Southport, N.C. The period covered is the calendar year 2004.

The 1 p.m. meeting at the Brunswick plant’s Media Center is open to public observation.

Before the end of the meeting, the NRC staff will be available to answer public questions on the

plant’s safety performance, as well as the NRC’s role in ensuring safe operation of the facility.

“Each year the NRC staff rates the performance of the Brunswick plant and all of the nation’s

other commercial nuclear power plants,” NRC Region II Administrator William Travers said. “This

meeting gives us a chance to discuss our assessment with the company, with local officials and with

residents near the plant. Our aim is to make this information available to the public and answer any

questions people may have about our oversight.”

 The NRC uses color coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear

power plant performance. The colors start with “green” and increase to “white,” “yellow,” or “red,”

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. 

Brunswick Units 1 and 2 operated safely during 2004, the NRC report said. However, one

inspection finding related to an emergency diesel generator was classified as “white” (of low to

moderate safety significance) during the review period. A subsequent NRC inspection found that the

company’s corrective actions were adequate to address the issues. Based on these results and overall

performance, the NRC will conduct only normal reactor oversight safety inspections during the next

evaluation period. The NRC also plans to conduct an inspection of the Brunswick license renewal

aging management program.

A letter sent from the NRC Region II office in Atlanta to plant officials addresses the plant’s

performance during 2004 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the

NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/bru_2004q4.pdf .

Routine inspections are performed by NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by

inspection specialists from the Region II office in Atlanta and the agency’s headquarters in Rockville,

Md.
Current information for the Brunswick plant is available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/BRU1/bru1_chart.html and

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/BRU2/bru2_chart.html .

###
### §304. Provisions authorized in lease

Any lease granted by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to this chapter may, in the discretion of said Secretary, contain a provision giving the lessee the right, with the approval of said Secretary, to shut down the operation of any well or wells the operation of which has become unprofitable, to resume operations when such resumption may result in profit, and to abandon any well or wells that cease to produce oil and/or gas in paying quantities.

(May 21, 1930, ch. 307, §4, 46 Stat. 374.)
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSB Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of PSB.

|/s/ANTHONY DISANDRO,President and Chief Executive Officer                 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/JOHN CARROZZA,Senior Vice President and Acting Chief Financial Officer |  | 

Dated:
April 5, 2004

---

QuickLinks
§ 1208.11 Choice of procedure under USERRA; exhaustion requirement. ( a ) *Choice of procedure.* An appellant may file a USERRA appeal directly with the Board under this subpart *or* may file a complaint with the Secretary of Labor under 38 U.S.C. 4322.
( b ) *Exhaustion requirement.* If an appellant files a complaint with the Secretary of Labor under 38 U.S.C. 4322, the appellant may not file a USERRA appeal with the Board until the Secretary notifies the appellant in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 4322(e) that the Secretary's efforts have not resolved the complaint. An appellant who seeks assistance from the Secretary of Labor under 38 U.S.C. 4321 but does not file a complaint with the Secretary under 38 U.S.C. 4322 is not subject to the exhaustion requirement of this paragraph.
( c ) *Appeals after exhaustion of Department of Labor procedure.* When an appellant receives notice from the Secretary of Labor in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 4322(e) that the Secretary's efforts have not resolved the complaint, the appellant may file a USERRA appeal directly with the Board or may ask the Secretary to refer the complaint to the Special Counsel. If the Special Counsel agrees to represent the appellant, the Special Counsel may file a USERRA appeal directly with the Board. If the Special Counsel does not agree to represent the appellant, the appellant may file a USERRA appeal directly with the Board.
[65 FR 5412, Feb. 4, 2000, as amended at 65 FR 49896, Aug. 16, 2000]
### §6714. Compliance agreements

(a) Types of Compliance Agreements.—A compliance agreement is an agreement—

(1) approved by the Secretary, between the governmental authority responsible for prosecuting a claim or complaint that is the basis of a holding of discrimination and the chief executive officer of the unit of general local government that has not complied with section 6711(a) or (b); or

(2) between the Secretary and the chief executive officer.

(b) Contents of Agreements.—A compliance agreement—

(1) shall state the conditions the unit of general local government has agreed to comply with that would satisfy the obligations of the government under sections 1 6711(a) and (b);

(2) shall cover each matter that has been found not to comply, or would not comply, with section 6711(a) or (b); and

(3) may be a series of agreements that dispose of those matters.

(c) Availability of Agreements to Parties.—The Secretary shall submit a copy of a compliance agreement to each person who filed a complaint referred to in section 6716(b), or, if an agreement under subsection (a)(1), each person who filed a complaint with a governmental authority, about a failure to comply with section 6711(a) or (b). The Secretary shall submit the copy by the 15th day after an agreement is made. However, if the Secretary approves an agreement under subsection (a)(1) after the agreement is made, the Secretary may submit the copy by the 15th day after approval of the agreement.

(Added Pub. L. 103–322, title III, §31001(a), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1877.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 6714, Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1023; Pub. L. 98–185, §6, Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1310, related to public hearings, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–272, title XIV, §14001(a)(1), (e), Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 327, 329, eff. Oct. 18, 1986.

1 So in original. Probably should be "section".
(January 19, 1948.)

#### In the Matter of Carolyn Silbermann, Respondent, against Ferdinand Q. Morton et al., Constituting the Municipal Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, Appellants.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Stan Cipkowski, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of American
Bio Medica Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [omitted]; and

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and


/s/ Stan Cipkowski
------------------
Chief Executive Officer

Date:  February 24, 2006
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# Change Notice CN 04-027.

Accession Number: ML043560096

Date Released: Thursday, December 23, 2004

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML043560087 - Change Notice CN 04-027, NRC Inspection Manual. (2 page(s), 12/1/2004)
    - ML043560102 - IMC 0608, "Performance Indicator Program." (17 page(s), 12/1/2004)
    - ML043560116 - IMC 0609 App A, "Determining the Significance of Reactor Inspection Findings for At-Power Situations." (29 page(s), 12/1/2004)
    - ML043560128 - IMC 1240, "Unescorted Access At Power Reactors." (3 page(s), 12/1/2004)
    - ML043560189 - IP 71111.05T, "Fire Protection (Triennial)." (18 page(s), 12/1/2004)
    - ML043560443 - 10 CFR, "10  CFR Part 71 and 49 CFR 171 - 178 Transportation of Radioactive Material." (53 page(s), 12/1/2004)
    - ML043570400 - Table of Contents for CN 04-027. (34 page(s), 12/1/2004)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0059 - NRC's  Advanced Reactor Research Program

Accession Number: ML023310529

Date Released: Tuesday, May 6, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML023310534 - SECY-03-0059 - NRC's  Advanced Reactor Research Program (5 page(s), 4/18/2003)
    - ML023310550 - SECY-03-0059-Attachment 1- Planned Advanced Reactor Activities (15 page(s), 3/1/2003)
    - ML023310540 - SECY-03-0059-Attachment 2 - Advanced Reactor Research Infrastructure Assessment  Rev 3 (136 page(s), 1/1/2003)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### §6403. Guidance applying data standards for grant reporting

(a) In General.—Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this chapter—

(1) the Secretary and the Director shall jointly issue guidance to all agencies directing the agencies to apply the data standards established under section 6402(a) to all applicable reporting by recipients of Federal awards; and

(2) the Director shall prescribe guidance applying the data standards established under section 6402(a) to audit-related information reported under chapter 75 of this title.

(b) Guidance.—The guidance issued under subsection (a) shall—

(1) to the extent reasonable and practicable—

(A) minimize the disruption of existing reporting practices of, and not increase the reporting burden on, agencies or recipients of Federal awards; and

(B) explore opportunities to implement modern technologies in reporting relating to Federal awards;

(2) allow the Director to permit exceptions for classes of Federal awards, including exceptions for Federal awards granted to Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations consistent with the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.), if the Director publishes a list of those exceptions and submits the list to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the House of Representatives; and

(3) take into consideration the consultation required under section 6402(d).

(c) Updating Guidance.—

(1) In general.—Not less frequently than once every 10 years, the Director shall update the guidance issued under subsection (a).

(2) Procedures.—In updating guidance under paragraph (1), the Director shall, to the maximum extent practicable, follow the procedures for the development of the data standards and guidance prescribed under this section and section 6402.

(Added Pub. L. 116–103, §4(a), Dec. 30, 2019, 133 Stat. 3269.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of enactment of this chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 116–103, which was approved Dec. 30, 2019.

The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), is Pub. L. 93–638, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2203, which is classified principally to chapter 46 (§5301 et seq.) of Title 25, Indians. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1 of Pub. L. 93–638, set out as a Short Title note under section 5301 of Title 25 and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Oversight and Reform of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Oversight and Accountability of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Eighteenth Congress, Jan. 9, 2023.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sonia Guadalupe URIARTE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-50616.

D.C. No. CR-00-00994-TJW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 24, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Sonia Guadalupe Uriarte appeals her guilty plea conviction and 4-month sentence for one count of importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we affirm.

Uriarte contends that 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960 are unconstitutional under *Ap*
      *632
      *prendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) and *United States v. Nordby,*225 F.3d 1053, 1058-59 (9th Cir.2000), *overruled in part by United States v. Buckland,*289 F.3d 558, 2002 WL 857751, at *6 (9th Cir. May 7, 2002) (en banc) (overruling Nordby’s conclusion that Congress committed drug quantity to the sentencing judge to decide by a preponderance of the evidence). This contention is foreclosed by our decisions *in United States v. Varela-Rivera,*279 F.3d 1174, 1175 n. 1 (9th Cir.2002) (concluding that *Buckland,*which determined that § 841 is constitutional, also precludes a challenge to the constitutionality of § 952), and *United States v. Mendoza-Paz,*286 F.3d 1104, 1109-10 (9th Cir.2002) (concluding that *Apprendi*does not render § 960 facially unconstitutional).

Moreover, Uriarte’s 4-month sentence is well below the 5-year statutory maximum for importation of any amount of marijuana. *See*§ 960(b)(4). Where a defendant’s actual sentence falls below the statutory maximum for the offense to which she pleaded guilty, she is not prejudiced for purposes of *Apprendi See United States v. Scheele,*231 F.3d 492, 497 n. 2 (9th Cir.2000). Accordingly, any sentencing error under *Apprendi*was harmless. *See United States v. Garcia-Guizar,*234 F.3d 483, 488-89 (9th Cir.2000), *cert. denied,*532 U.S. 984, 121 S.Ct. 1629, 149 L.Ed.2d 490 (2001).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
§ 185.131 Sanctions. ( a ) The ALJ may sanction a person including any party or representative for the following reasons: ( 1 ) Failure to comply with an order, rule, or procedure governing the proceeding;
( 2 ) Failure to prosecute or defend an action; or
( 3 ) Engaging in other misconduct that interferes with the speedy, orderly, or fair conduct of the proceeding.
( b ) Any such sanction, including but not limited to those listed in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section, shall reasonably relate to the severity and nature of the failure or misconduct.
( c ) When a party fails to comply with an order, including an order for taking a deposition, the production of evidence within the party's control, or a request for admission, the ALJ may ( 1 ) Draw an inference in favor of the requesting party with regard to the information sought;
( 2 ) In the case of requests for admission, deem each matter of which an admission is requested to be admitted;
( 3 ) Prohibit the party failing to comply with such order from introducing evidence concerning, or otherwise relying upon, testimony relating to the information sought; and
( 4 ) Strike any part of the pleadings or other submissions of the party failing to comply with such request.
( d ) If a party fails to prosecute or defend an action under this part commenced by service of a notice of hearing, the ALJ may dismiss the action or may issue an initial decision imposing penalties and assessments.
( e ) The ALJ may refuse to consider any motion, request, response, brief or other document which is not filed in a timely fashion.