alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED,


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report, or the Report, of Multimedia Games, Inc.
(the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof, the undersigned, Anthony Sanfilippo, President and Chief
Executive Officer, and Adam D. Chibib, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company,
each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, based upon each of
their respective knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m);
      and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
      May 8, 2009
                /s/  Anthony
      SanfilippoAnthony
      SanfilippoPresident
      andChief
      Executive Officer/s/  Adam D.
    ChibibAdam
      D. ChibibChief
      Financial Officer




A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Multimedia Games, Inc. and will be
retained by Multimedia Games, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65174-65175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27376]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: NIDCR Special Grants Review Committee; NIDCR 
Special Grant Review (DSR).
    Date: February 21-22, 2019.
    Time: 8:00 p.m. to 12:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, Suite 6711, Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, 
MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Latarsha J. Carithers, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute of Dental and 
Craniofacial Research, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-4859, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#365a57425744455e57185557445f425e53444576585f5e18515940"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f59994819487869d94db9694879c819d908786b59b9c9ddb929a83">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 65175]]


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 13, 2018.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-27376 Filed 12-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Visek Brothers v. Safeway Trails, Inc.

Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Yan Yoorhis, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 662.]
#### § 213.3199 Temporary organizations.

*Positions on the staffs of temporary organizations, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 3161(a).* Appointments may not exceed 3 years, but temporary organizations may extend the appointments for 2 additional years if the conditions for extension are related to the completion of the study or project.

[68 FR 24605, May 8, 2003]
§ 182.43 Eligible goods subject to USMCA drawback. Except as otherwise provided in this subpart, drawback is authorized for an imported good that is entered for consumption and is: ( a ) Subsequently exported to Canada or Mexico (*see* 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1));
( b ) Used as a material in the production of another good that is subsequently exported to Canada or Mexico (*see* 19 U.S.C. 1313(a)); or
( c ) Substituted by a good of the same kind and quality as defined in § 182.44(d) and used as a material in the production of another good that is subsequently exported to Canada or Mexico (*see* 19 U.S.C. 1313(b)).
[CBP Dec. 21-10, CBP Dec. 21-10, 86 FR 35587, July 6, 2021]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6511

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

FRANK LEON ROBINSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Aiken. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:98-cr-00523-JFA-1)

Submitted: July 11, 2012 Decided: July 18, 2012

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank Leon Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Frank Leon Robinson appeals the district court’s 

orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a 

sentence reduction and motion for reconsideration. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we grant Robinson leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm

the denial of Robinson’s § 3582(c)(2) motion for the reasons 

stated by the district court. United States v. Robinson, No. 

1:98-cr-00523-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Jan. 17, 2012). Because the 

district court lacked the authority to consider Robinson’s 

motion to reconsider, see United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 

233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010), we affirm the district court’s 

denial of relief. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §11. Authority for compact between Middle Northwest States as to jurisdiction of offenses committed on boundary waters

The consent of the Congress is given to the States of North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Nebraska, or any two or more of them, by such agreement or compact as they may deem desirable or necessary, or as may be evidenced by legislative acts enacted by any two or more of said States, not in conflict with the Constitution of the United States or any law thereof, to determine and settle the jurisdiction to be exercised by said States, respectively, over offenses arising out of the violation of the laws of any of said States upon any of the waters forming the boundary lines between any two or more of said States, or waters through which such boundary line extends, and that the consent of the Congress be, and the same is, given to the concurrent jurisdiction agreed to by the States of Minnesota and South Dakota, as evidenced by the act of the Legislature of the State of Minnesota approved April 20, 1917, and the act of the Legislature of the State of South Dakota approved February 13, 1917.

(Mar. 4, 1921, ch. 176, 41 Stat. 1447.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This section is from a resolution entitled a "Joint Resolution giving consent of the Congress of the United States to the States of North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Nebraska, or any two or more of said States, to agree upon the jurisdiction to be exercised by said States over boundary waters between any two or more of said States".
### §1293. Employee protection

#### (a) Retaliatory practices prohibited

No person shall discharge, or in any other way discriminate against, or cause to be fired or discriminated against, any employee or any authorized representative of employees by reason of the fact that such employee or representative has filed, instituted, or caused to be filed or instituted any proceeding under this chapter, or has testified or is about to testify in any proceeding resulting from the administration or enforcement of the provisions of this chapter.

#### (b) Review by Secretary; investigation; notice; hearing; findings of fact; judicial review

Any employee or a representative of employees who believes that he has been fired or otherwise discriminated against by any person in violation of subsection (a) of this section may, within thirty days after such alleged violation occurs, apply to the Secretary for a review of such firing or alleged discrimination. A copy of the application shall be sent to the person or operator who will be the respondent. Upon receipt of such application, the Secretary shall cause such investigation to be made as he deems appropriate. Such investigation shall provide an opportunity for a public hearing at the request of any party to such review to enable the parties to present information relating to the alleged violation. The parties shall be given written notice of the time and place of the hearing at least five days prior to the hearing. Any such hearing shall be of record and shall be subject to section 554 of title 5. Upon receiving the report of such investigation the Secretary shall make findings of fact. If he finds that a violation did occur, he shall issue a decision incorporating therein his findings and an order requiring the party committing the violation to take such affirmative action to abate the violation as the Secretary deems appropriate, including, but not limited to, the rehiring or reinstatement of the employee or representative of employees to his former position with compensation. If he finds that there was no violation, he will issue a finding. Orders issued by the Secretary under this subsection shall be subject to judicial review in the same manner as orders and decisions of the Secretary are subject to judicial review under this chapter.

#### (c) Costs

Whenever an order is issued under this section to abate any violation, at the request of the applicant a sum equal to the aggregate amount of all costs and expenses (including attorneys' fees) to have been reasonably incurred by the applicant for, or in connection with, the institution and prosecution of such proceedings, shall be assessed against the persons committing the violation.

(Pub. L. 95–87, title VII, §703, Aug. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 520.)
#### § 2429.29 Content of filings.

With one exception, if you file any document with the Authority or the Office of Administrative Law Judges in a proceeding covered by this subchapter—including any briefs that you upload into the FLRA's eFiling system as attachments—and that document exceeds 10 double-spaced pages in length, then you must ensure that the document includes a table of contents. The one exception is that, if you use the fillable forms in the FLRA's eFiling system, then you are not required to submit a table of contents to accompany the fillable forms.

[77 FR 26437, May 4, 2012]
§ 4.36 Delayed discharge of cargo. ( a ) When pursuant to section 457, Tariff Act of 1930, customs officers are placed on a vessel which has retained merchandise on board more than 25 days after the date of the vessel's arrival, their compensation and subsistence expenses shall be reimbursed to the Government by the owner or master.
( b ) The compensation of all Customs officers and employees assigned to supervise the discharge of a cargo within the purview of section 458, Tariff Act of 1930,[70] after the expiration of 25 days after the date of the vessel's entry shall be reimbursed to the Government by the owner or master of the vessel.
( c ) When cargo is manifested “for orders” upon the arrival of the vessel, no amendment of the manifest to show another port of discharge shall be permitted after 15 days after the date of the vessel's arrival, except as provided for in § 4.33.
( d ) All reimbursements payable in accordance with this section shall be paid or secured to the port director before clearance is granted to the vessel.
[28 FR 14596, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 95-77, 60 FR 50010, Sept. 27, 1995; T.D. 98-74, 63 FR 51287, Sept. 25, 1998] Footnotes -
4.36
[70] “The limitation of time for unlading shall not extend to vessels laden exclusively with merchandise in bulk consigned to one consignee and arriving at a port for orders, but if the master of such vessel requests a longer time to discharge its cargo, the compensation of the inspectors or other customs officers whose services are required in connection with the unlading shall, for every day consumed in unlading in excess of twenty-five (25) days from the date of the vessel's entry, be reimbursed by the master or owner of such vessel.” (Tariff Act of 1930, sec. 458; 19 U.S.C. 1458)
[71-75] [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the
"Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Nancy J. Baker, Chief Financial Officer of
Cymer, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Registrant"), hereby certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:



In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set her hand hereto as of the 3rd day of November, 2008.

/s/ NANCY J. BAKER Nancy J. Baker, Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cymer, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
made before or after the date of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which it relates), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
#### § 1215.33 Omissions not a defense.

Failure to comply with any provisions of this rule may not serve as a defense to any debtor.
Exhibit
32.2
  SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION (CFO)
  YUHE
INTERNATIONAL, INC.
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
  AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Yuhe International, Inc., the “Company”, on
Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the “Report”, I, Hu Gang, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:
October 15,
2010
  /s/
      Hu GangHu
      GangChief
      Financial Officer
### §282. Leases to permittees of lands showing valuable deposits; royalty

Upon showing to the satisfaction of the Secretary of the Interior that valuable deposits of one of the substances enumerated in this subchapter has been discovered by the permittee within the area covered by his permit, and that such land is chiefly valuable therefor, the permittee shall be entitled to a lease for any or all of the land embraced in the prospecting permit, at a royalty of not less than 2 per centum of the quantity or gross value of the output of potassium compounds and other related products, except sodium, at the point of shipment to market, such lease to be taken in compact form by legal subdivisions of the public land surveys, or if the land be not surveyed, by survey executed at the cost of the permittee in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Interior.

(Feb. 7, 1927, ch. 66, §2, 44 Stat. 1057.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which comprises this chapter.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-05-002 January 14, 2005

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.

TO DISCUSS RESULTS OF ENGINEERING TEAM INSPECTION

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will meet with representatives of Pacific Gas &

Electric Co. on Tuesday, Feb. 15, to discuss the results of the agency’s engineering team

inspection at the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant. Diablo Canyon is located near San Luis Obispo,

Calif., and is operated by Pacific Gas & Electric.

“The engineering team inspection is part of an effort by the NRC to improve its Reactor

Oversight Process by consolidating several engineering inspections into one comprehensive

effort involving about 700 inspection hours,” said Bruce Mallet, NRC’s Region IV

administrator. “Five inspectors spent three weeks conducting a very comprehensive review and

this meeting will provide the public with an opportunity hear about our findings and ask

questions.” 

The meeting will be held at the Embassy Suites Hotel, 333 Madonna Road, San Luis

Obispo, from 6 to 9 p.m. The public is invited to observe the meeting and NRC staff will be

available for comments and questions from the public before the meeting adjourns.

###
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the                           ( print page 62447)                        companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies.  Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

                    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors.  Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.  Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at                     *www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​*.                

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 9, 2004.

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland**                     (Cindy C. West, Banking Supervisor) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:                

*1.  Tri-State 1st Banc, Inc.*, East Liverpool, Ohio; to acquire MDH Investment Management, Inc., East Liverpool, Ohio, and thereby engage in permissible investment advisory activities, pusuant to section 225.28(b)(6)(i) of Regulation Y.                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 20, 2004.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 04-23891 Filed 10-25-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
### §2071. Inland navigation rules

The Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating may issue inland navigation regulations applicable to all vessels upon the inland waters of the United States and technical annexes that are as consistent as possible with the respective annexes to the International Regulations.

(Pub. L. 96–591, §3, Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3433; Pub. L. 108–293, title III, §303(b), Aug. 9, 2004, 118 Stat. 1042.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The International Regulations, referred to in text, came into effect pursuant to the Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972. See International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 note under section 1602 of this title.

#### Amendments

2004—Pub. L. 108–293 amended section catchline and text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The Secretary may issue regulations necessary to implement and interpret this chapter. The Secretary shall establish the following technical annexes to these Rules: Annex I, Positioning and Technical Details of Lights and Shapes; Annex II, Additional Signals for Fishing Vessels Fishing in Close Proximity; Annex III, Technical Details of Sound Appliances; and Annex IV, Distress Signals. These annexes shall be as consistent as possible with the respective annexes to the International Regulations. The Secretary may establish other technical annexes, including local pilot rules."
Case 9:20-mc-81409-RKA   Document 1-3   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2020   Page 1 of 6

Case 9:20-mc-81409-RKA   Document 1-3   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2020   Page 2 of 6

Case 9:20-mc-81409-RKA   Document 1-3   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2020   Page 3 of 6

Case 9:20-mc-81409-RKA   Document 1-3   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2020   Page 4 of 6

Case 9:20-mc-81409-RKA   Document 1-3   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2020   Page 5 of 6

Case 9:20-mc-81409-RKA   Document 1-3   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2020   Page 6 of 6
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bio Medica Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2010 (the “Report”), I,
Stefan Parker, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Finance of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/ Stefan ParkerStefan
      ParkerChief
      Financial Officer/Executive Vice President, FinancePrincipal
      Financial OfficerPrincipal
      Accounting OfficerNovember
      15, 2010