alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 210.15 Motions. ( a ) *Presentation and disposition.* ( 1 ) During the period between the institution of an investigation and the assignment of the investigation to a presiding administrative law judge, all motions shall be addressed to the chief administrative law judge. During the time that an investigation or related proceeding is before an administrative law judge, all motions therein shall be addressed to the administrative law judge.
( 2 ) When an investigation or related proceeding is before the Commission, all motions shall be addressed to the Chairman of the Commission. All such motions shall be filed with the Secretary and shall be served upon each party. Motions may not be filed with the Commission during preinstitution proceedings except for motions for temporary relief pursuant to § 210.53.
( b ) *Content.* All written motions shall state the particular order, ruling, or action desired and the grounds therefor.
( c ) *Responses to motions.* Within 10 days after service of any written motions, or within such longer or shorter time as may be designated by the administrative law judge or the Commission, a nonmoving party, or in the instance of a motion to amend the complaint or notice of investigation to name an additional respondent after institution, the proposed respondent, shall respond or he may be deemed to have consented to the granting of the relief asked for in the motion. The moving party shall have no right to reply, except as permitted by the administrative law judge or the Commission.
( d ) *Motions for extensions.* As a matter of discretion, the administrative law judge or the Commission may waive the requirements of this section as to motions for extension of time, and may rule upon such motions ex parte.
[59 FR 39039, Aug. 1, 1994, as amended at 78 FR 23482, Apr. 19, 2013; 83 FR 21160, May 8, 2018]
§ 2608.301 Fees. ( a ) *Generally.* The General Counsel may condition the production of records or appearance for testimony upon advance payment of a reasonable estimate of the costs to OGE.
( b ) *Fees for records.* Fees for producing records will include fees for searching, reviewing, and duplicating records, costs of attorney time spent in reviewing the demand or request, and expenses generated by materials and equipment used to search for, produce, and copy the responsive information. Costs for employee time will be calculated on the basis of the hourly pay of the employee (including all pay, allowance, and benefits). Fees for duplication will be the same as those charged by OGE in its Freedom of Information Act and Ethics in Government Act fee regulations at 5 CFR part 2604, subparts E and G.
( c ) *Witness fees.* Fees for attendance by a witness will include fees, expenses, and allowances prescribed by the court's rules. If no such fees are prescribed, witness fees will be determined based upon the rule of the Federal district court closest to the location where the witness will appear. Such fees will include cost of time spent by the witness to prepare for testimony, in travel, and for attendance in the legal proceeding.
( d ) *Payment of fees.* You must pay witness fees for current OGE employees and any records certification fees by submitting to the General Counsel a check or money order for the appropriate amount made payable to the Treasury of the United States. In the case of testimony by former OGE employees, you must pay applicable fees directly to the former employee in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1821 or other applicable statutes.
( e ) *Certification (authentication) of copies of records.* The Office of Government Ethics may certify that records are true copies in order to facilitate their use as evidence. If you seek certification, you must request certified copies from OGE at least 45 days before the date they will be needed. The request should be sent to the General Counsel. You will be charged a certification fee of $15.00 for each document certified.
( f ) *Waiver or reduction of fees.* The General Counsel, in his or her sole discretion, may, upon a showing of reasonable cause, waive or reduce any fees in connection with the testimony, production, or certification of records.
( g ) *De minimis fees.* Fees will not be assessed if the total charge would be $10.00 or less.
§ 1209.10 Hearing and order ruling on stay request. ( a ) *Hearing.* The judge may hold a hearing on the stay request.
( b ) *Order ruling on stay request.* ( 1 ) The judge must rule upon the stay request within 10 days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays) after the request is received by the appropriate Board regional or field office.
( 2 ) The judge's ruling on the stay request must set forth the factual and legal bases for the decision. The judge must decide whether there is a substantial likelihood that the appellant will prevail on the merits of the appeal, and whether the stay would result in extreme hardship to the agency.
( 3 ) If the judge grants a stay, the order must specify the effective date and duration of the stay.
[55 FR 28592, July 12, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 65243, Dec. 19, 1994]
Exhibit 99.1Certification of CEO  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United
States Code), the undersigned officer of Gateway, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the financial
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: November 14, 2002 | By: |  | /s/THEODORE W. WAITTTheodore W. Waitt
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComputer programs for smoothing and scaling airfoil coordinatesDetailed descriptions are given of the theoretical methods and associated computer codes of a program to smooth and a program to scale arbitrary airfoil coordinates. The smoothing program utilizes both least-squares polynomial and least-squares cubic spline techniques to smooth interatively the second derivatives of the y-axis airfoil coordinates with respect to a transformed x-axis system which unwraps the airfoil and stretches the nose and trailing-edge regions. The corresponding smooth airfoil coordinates are then determined by solving a tridiagonal matrix of simultaneous cubic-spline equations relating the y-axis coordinates and their corresponding second derivatives. A technique for computing the camber and thickness distribution of the smoothed airfoil is also discussed. The scaling program can then be used to scale the thickness distribution generated by the smoothing program to a specific maximum thickness which is then combined with the camber distribution to obtain the final scaled airfoil contour. Computer listings of the smoothing and scaling programs are included.Document ID19850022698Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMorgan, H. L., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1983Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:84666NASA-TM-84666Accession Number85N31011Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-31-23-06Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850022698.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 2604.102 Applicability. ( a ) *General.* The FOIA and this rule apply to all OGE records. However, if another law sets forth procedures for the disclosure of specific types of records, such as section 105 of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 5 U.S.C. appendix, OGE will process a request for those records in accordance with the procedures that apply to those specific records. See 5 CFR 2634.603 and subpart G of this part. If there is any record which is not required to be released under those provisions, OGE will consider the request under the FOIA and this rule, provided that the special Ethics Act access procedures cited must be complied with as to any record within the scope thereof.
( b ) *The relationship between the FOIA and the Privacy Act of 1974.* The Freedom of Information Act applies to third-party requests for documents concerning the general activities of the government and of OGE in particular. The Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, applies to records that are about individuals, but only if the records are in a system of records as defined in the Privacy Act. When an individual requests access to his or her own records that are contained in an OGE system of records, the individual is making a Privacy Act request, not a FOIA request. Although OGE determines whether a request is a FOIA or Privacy Act request, OGE processes requests in accordance with both laws and will not deny access by a first party to a record under the FOIA or the Privacy Act if the record is available to that individual under both statutes. This provides the greatest degree of lawful access while safeguarding individuals' personal privacy.
( c ) *Records available through routine distribution procedures.* When the record requested includes material published and offered for sale (e.g., by the Government Publishing Office) or which is available to the public through an established distribution system (such as that of the National Technical Information Service of the Department of Commerce), OGE will explain how the record may be obtained through those channels. If the requester, after having been advised of such alternative access, asks for regular FOIA processing instead, OGE will provide the record in accordance with its usual FOIA procedures under this part.
#### Ignatius Custer v. William L. Abbott.

Motion granted, unless appellant complies with terms stated in order. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 2411.15 Annual report. Each year, on or around February 1, as requested by the Department of Justice's Office of Information Policy, the Chief FOIA Officer of the FLRA shall submit a report of the activities of the Solicitor and the IG with regard to public information requests during the preceding fiscal year to the Attorney General of the United States and the Director of the OGIS. The report shall include those matters required by 5 U.S.C. 552(e), and it shall be made available electronically. The Chief FOIA Officer of the FLRA shall make each such report available for public inspection in an electronic format. In addition, the Chief FOIA Officer of the FLRA shall make the raw statistical data used in each report available in a timely manner for public inspection in an electronic format, which shall be available— ( a ) Without charge, license, or registration requirement;
( b ) In an aggregated, searchable format; and
( c ) In a format that may be downloaded in bulk.
[88 FR 67063, Sept. 29, 2023]
<Page>

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Public
Accountants" incorporated by reference into this Post-Effective Amendment No.
19 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 33-37577) of Fortis Benefits
Insurance Company and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report
dated February 17, 2000, with respect to the financial statements of Fortis
Benefits Insurance Company included in the Prospectus and Statement of
Additional Information of Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to the Registration
Statement (Form N-4 No. 33-37577) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Minneapolis, Minnesota                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
January 21, 2003
#### Crescensio Novello, Appellant, v. National Transportation Co., Inc., Respondent.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Martin, P. J., and Glennon, J., dissent and vote to affirm. Settle order on notice.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-044 April 20, 2004

NRC SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON PROPOSED PILOT PROGRAM FOR USE OF

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment on a proposed pilot program

for the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in resolving discrimination complaints and other

allegations of wrongdoing in the agency’s enforcement program.

The pilot program aims to use ADR in two potential scenarios: before initiation of an NRC

investigation (so-called “early ADR”), when the parties would be the whistleblower and the licensee;

or after completion of an investigation, when the parties would be the NRC and the licensee. The aim

would be to reach a settlement within 90 days of agreeing to mediation. In the case of early ADR, the

agency believes the timely resolution of complaints will contribute to a safety-conscious work

environment.

Mediators would be neutral third parties - not affiliated with the NRC or the licensee - mutually

acceptable to both parties in the dispute. For early ADR, the mediators’ fees will be paid by the NRC, 

and there will be a three-day waiting period before any settlement takes full effect. For ADR after an

investigation has been completed, the NRC and the licensee will share the mediator’s fee.

The pilot program is generally consistent with input received from public comments in response

to a Federal Register notice and during a public meeting held in December. 

The NRC encourages licensees to develop their own ADR programs (independent of the NRC’s

pilot program) to address employee concerns. The NRC proposes that should an employee who

alleges retaliation for raising safety or other concerns use a licensee’s program to settle the

discrimination complaint, no NRC investigation will be initiated until it is determined whether a

settlement can be reached. If a settlement is reached, the NRC will review it for restrictive agreements

in violation of NRC regulations or abuse of the ADR process. If the settlement is acceptable, the NRC

will not investigate or take enforcement action.

The NRC is developing a booklet for whistleblowers who are considering requesting early

ADR. The booklet will provide an overview of the NRC’s early ADR program and ADR in general,

supplementing the allegation booklet already provided to concerned individuals. Information regarding
the pilot program will be placed on the Office of Enforcement’s Web page at

http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/regulatory/enforcement.html . 

A notice summarizing the pilot program was published today (April 20) in the Federal

Register. The deadline for submitting comments is May 20. Comments may be submitted by e-mail to

SECY@nrc.gov ; by fax to Secretary, NRC, at 301-415-1101; or by mail to Secretary, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications

Staff. Comments will be posted in their entirety on the NRC Web site, and personal information will

not be removed.

###
Exhibit
31.1




RULE
13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION FOR FORM 10-K (CEO) CERTIFICATION




I, Gao
Zhentao, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Yuhe International,
Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:




a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to the Company by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




b.
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;




c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a. All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




b. Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.









Date:
      June 3, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Gao ZhentaoGao
      ZhentaoChief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit
        32.2
  SECTION
        1350 CERTIFICATION (CFO) 1350
  FIRST
        GROWTH INVESTORS, INC.
  CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
  18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
  AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
        connection with the Annual Report of First Growth Investors, Inc., the
“Company”, on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the “Report”, I,
        Jiang Yingjun, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of opera tions
        of
        the Company.
  Date:
        March 31, 2008


/s/
                Jiang YingjunJiang
                YingjunChief
                Financial Officer
§ 2417.201 General prohibition and designation of the appropriate decision-maker. ( a ) *General prohibition.* No employee or former employee of the Authority, the General Counsel, or the Panel may produce official records and information or provide any testimony relating to official information in response to a request or demand without the prior, written approval of the Chairman of the FLRA, the General Counsel, or the Chairman of the Panel, as appropriate.
( b ) *Appropriate decision-maker.* ( 1 ) The Chairman of the FLRA, or his or her designee, determines whether to grant approval if the record requested or demanded is maintained by the FLRA's Authority component, or the person who is the subject of the request or demand is subject to the supervision or control of the FLRA's Authority component or was subject to such supervision or control when formerly employed at the FLRA.
( 2 ) The General Counsel, or his or her designee, determines whether to grant approval if the record requested or demanded is maintained by the General Counsel, or the person who is the subject of the request or demand is subject to the supervision or control of the General Counsel or was subject to such supervision or control when formerly employed at the FLRA.
( 3 ) The Chairman of the Panel, or his or her designee, determines whether to grant approval if the record requested or demanded is maintained by the Panel, or the person who is the subject of the request or demand is subject to the supervision or control of the Panel or was subject to such supervision or control when formerly employed at the FLRA.
[81 FR 63362, Sept. 15, 2016]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF FIRST WAVE MARINE, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
       NAME OF SUBSIDIARY OR ORGANIZATION                           STATE OF INCORPORATION
       ----------------------------------                           ----------------------
<S>                                                                 <C>
     Newpark Shipbuilding-Brady Island, Inc.*                                Texas

     Newpark Shipbuilding-Greens Bayou, Inc.*                                Texas

          Newpark Shipbuilding-Pasadena, Inc.*                               Texas

     Newpark Shipbuilding-Pelican Island, Inc.*                              Texas
 
     Newpark Shipbuilding-Galveston Island, Inc.*                            Texas

                  EAE Industries, Inc.                                       Texas

                  EAE Services, Inc.                                         Texas

              FirstWave Management, Inc.                                    Delaware
</TABLE> 

* Doing business under the assumed name of "Newpark Shipbuilding".
#### § 2430.10 Settlement.

The applicant and the General Counsel may agree on a proposed settlement of the award before final action on the application. If an applicant and the General Counsel agree on a proposed settlement of an award before an application has been filed, the proposed settlement shall be filed with the application. All such settlements shall be subject to approval by the Authority.