alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Josephine F. B. Porter, Respondent, v. David B. Porter, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-05-040 October 18, 2005

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC SCHEDULES REGULATORY CONFERENCE

TO DISCUSS WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT CONCERN

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a regulatory conference with officials

of the Tennessee Valley Authority on Oct. 25 in Atlanta to discuss the risk significance of an

inspection finding at the company’s Watts Bar nuclear power plant, located near Spring City, Tenn.

NRC and TVA officials will discuss the significance of an NRC inspection finding related to

events while the plant was shut down in February of this year. NRC inspectors found that operators at

the Watts Bar plant made decisions which resulted in pressurizer valves lifting several times. The

inspectors determined that the operators may not have adequately followed their procedures and their

actions were an apparent violation of the plant’s technical specifications. 

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear power plants with a colorcoded system which classifies findings as either green, white, yellow or red, in increasing order of

safety significance. The NRC’s preliminary evaluation determined that this issue at Watts Bar appears

to be greater than green or, in other words, greater than very low safety significance.

The meeting is open to public observation and is scheduled for 2:00 p.m. in the NRC’s Region

II office, located on the 24th floor of the Atlanta Federal Center at 61 Forsyth Street SW in Atlanta.

No decisions on the final safety significance, apparent violations or possible enforcement action

will be made during the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a later time.

###
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 208 (Thursday, October 28, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 62809-62810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24141]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 61

[Docket No. FAA-2002-11666; Amendment No. 61-111]
RIN 2120-AH76


Picture Identification Requirements

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects an amendment number in the final rule 
published in the Federal Register on October 28, 2002. That rule 
revised the pilot certificate regulations requiring a person to carry a 
photo identification acceptable to the FAA Administrator when 
exercising the privileges of a pilot certificate.

DATES: Effective Date: This correction is effective on October 28, 
2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John D. Lynch, telephone (202) 267-
3844.

Correction

    In the final rule FR Doc. 02-27411 published on October 28, 2002 
(67 FR 65858) make the following correction:
    1. On page 65858, in column 1, in the heading section of the rule , 
beginning on line 4 of the heading, correct ``Amendment No. 61-107'' to 
read ``Amendment No. 61-111.''


[[Page 62810]]


    Issued in Washington, DC on October 22, 2004.
Anthony F. Fazio,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 04-24141 Filed 10-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
§ 2472.2 Definitions. ( a ) The term *the Act* means the Federal Employees Flexible and Compressed Work Schedules Act of 1982, Pub. L. 97-221, 5 U.S.C. 6120 *et seq.*
( b ) The term *adverse agency impact* shall have the meaning set forth in 5 U.S.C. 6131(b).
( c ) The term *agency* shall have the meaning set forth in 5 U.S.C. 6121(1).
( d ) The term *duly authorized delegatee* means an official who has been delegated the authority to act for the head of the agency in the matter concerned.
( e ) The term *agency determination* means a determination: ( 1 ) Not to establish a flexible or compressed work schedule under 5 U.S.C. 6131(c)(2); or
( 2 ) to terminate such a schedule under 5 U.S.C. 6131(c)(3).
( f ) The terms *collective bargaining agreement* and *exclusive representative* shall have the meanings set forth in 5 U.S.C. 6121(8).
( g ) The term *Executive Director* means the Executive Director of the Panel.
( h ) The terms *designated representative* or *designee* of the Panel means a Panel member, staff member, or other individual designated by the Panel to act on its behalf.
( i ) The term *flexible and compressed work schedules* shall have the meaning set forth in 5 U.S.C. 6121 *et seq.*
( j ) The term *hearing* means a factfinding hearing or any other hearing procedures deemed necessary to accomplish the purpose of 5 U.S.C. 6131.
( k ) The term *impasse* means that point in the negotiation of flexible and compressed work schedules at which the parties are unable to reach agreement on whether a schedule has had or would have an adverse agency impact.
( l ) The term *Panel* means the Federal Service Impasses Panel described in 5 U.S.C. 7119(c) or a quorum thereof.
( m ) The term *party* means the agency or the exclusive representative participating in negotiations concerning flexible and compressed work schedules.
( n ) The term *quorum* means a majority of the members of the Panel.
( o ) The term *schedule(s)* means flexible and compressed work schedules.
[48 FR 19695, May 2, 1983, as amended at 61 FR 41295, Aug. 8, 1996]
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.512 Importer obligations. ( a ) *General.* An importer who makes a claim under § 10.510(a) of this subpart is responsible for the truthfulness of the claim and of all the information and data contained in the supporting statement provided for in § 10.511 of this subpart, for submitting any supporting documents requested by CBP, and for the truthfulness of the information contained in those documents. However, an importer will not be subject to civil or administrative penalties under 19 U.S.C. 1592 for making an invalid claim for preferential tariff treatment or submitting an incorrect supporting statement, provided that the importer promptly and voluntarily corrects the claim or supporting statement and pays any duty owing (*see* §§ 10.561 and 10.562 of this subpart). In instances in which CBP requests the submission of supporting documents, CBP will allow for the direct submission by the exporter or producer of business confidential or other sensitive information, including cost and sourcing information.
( b ) *Compliance.* In order to make a claim for preferential tariff treatment under § 10.510(a) of this subpart, the importer: ( 1 ) Must have records that explain how the importer came to the conclusion that the good qualifies for preferential tariff treatment. Those records must include documents that support a claim that the article in question qualifies for preferential tariff treatment because it meets the applicable rules of origin set forth in General Note 25, HTSUS, and in this subpart. Those records may include a properly completed importer's supporting statement as set forth in § 10.511 of this subpart; and
( 2 ) May be required to present evidence that the conditions set forth in § 10.542 of this subpart were met if the imported article was shipped through an intermediate country.
( c ) *Information provided by exporter or producer.* The fact that the importer has made a claim or supporting statement based on information provided by an exporter or producer will not relieve the importer of the responsibility referred to in the first sentence of paragraph (a) of this section.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-058 March 30, 2005

NRC AUTHORIZES CONSTRUCTION OF MIXED-OXIDE FUEL FABRICATION FACILITY AT

SAVANNAH RIVER SITE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has authorized Duke, Cogema, Stone & Webster (DCS)

to construct a facility at the Savannah River Site in South Carolina to manufacture mixed-oxide

(MOX) fuel for eventual use in commercial nuclear power plants. The NRC staff performed

environmental and safety reviews to ensure that the facility’s design will have minimal environmental

impacts and will protect the public health and safety. Although in accordance with NRC procedures the

staff has issued the construction authorization, the adjudicatory process on certain issues remains open.

The facility, which will be owned by the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security

Administration, is part of a bilateral effort between the United States and the Russian Federation to

make supplies of surplus weapons-grade plutonium into more proliferation-resistant forms. Converting

the plutonium into MOX fuel will enable it to be used in commercial reactors to generate electricity. In

the United States, only those reactors authorized by the NRC will be permitted to use MOX fuel.

A public version of the NRC’s final safety evaluation report for the construction of the MOX

fuel fabrication facility is available on the agency’s Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/new-content.html . This report addresses regulatory requirements for

approval of construction and reflects the NRC staff’s conclusion that DCS’ design bases for the facility

provide reasonable assurance of protection against natural phenomena and the consequences of

potential accidents. The NRC’s environmental impact statement on the construction and operation of

the proposed facility is available at http://www.nrc.gov/materials/fuel-cycle-fac/mox/licensing.html . 

DCS, which is a contractor for DOE, must still apply for a nuclear materials license before it

can take possession of special nuclear material and begin fabricating the MOX fuel. In reviewing that

license application, the NRC will conduct additional safety reviews.

Although the NRC staff has issued the construction authorization, parties in the adjudicatory

hearing before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will have an opportunity to submit late-filed

contentions challenging the staff’s safety review.
On March 3, NRC granted a license amendment to Duke Energy Corp., allowing it to test four

MOX fuel assemblies at its Catawba nuclear plant near Rock Hill, S.C. Those lead test assemblies

have been manufactured in France using surplus U.S. weapons-grade plutonium.

###
M e mo r a ndu m t o F i l e

Sub j e c t: C om m un ica t i o n w i t h S a n Carl o s Ap ac h e T ri b e R e g ar d i ng D e si gn a t i o n o f H a y d e n

, A ri z o n a t o

N o n a tt ai n m e n t f o r t h e L e a d NAA Q S

F r o m : C o ll e e n M cKa ugh a n

, A ss o ci a te D ir e c t o r, A ir D i v i si o n

T o : F il e

D a t e : Jun e 1 1

, 20 13

Su mm a r y : C o ll ee n M c Ka ugh a n call e d L o r e tt a S t o n e

, E n v ir o n m e n t a l D i r e c t o r f o r t h e S a n Carl o s Ap ac h e

,

o n T u e s d a y

, Jun e 1 1

, 2 0 1 3

, t o i n f o r m h e r t h a t E P A R e g i o n 9 w a s p la nn i ng t o s e nd a l et t e r t o G o v e r n o r

J a n Br ewe r i n i t ia t i ng t h e r e d e si gn a t i o n p r o c e s s f o r H a y d e n

, A ri z o n a

, f o r t h e l e a d NAA Q S. T h is w a s t h e

s e c o nd call t o M s

. S t o n e o n t h is t o p ic

. M s

. M cKa ugh a n h a d als o call e d M s

. S t o n e s e v e ra l w ee k s a go t o

al e r t h e r t o t h is a c t i o n.

M s

. M cKa ugh a n l e f

t a vo i c e m ail b o t h t i m e s l ett i ng M s

. S t o n e k n o w t h a t E P A p l a n s t o r e d e si gn a t e t h e

H a y d e n

, A ri z o n a

, ar e a t o n o n a tt ai n m e n t f o r t h e l e a d NAA Q S. M s

. M cKa ugh a n i n f o r m e d M s

. S t o n e t h a t

t h e t ri b al la nd s we r e n o t i m p ac t e d b y t h is ac t i o n b ec a u s e t h e y a r e o u t si d e o f t h e p o t e n t ial

n o n a tt ai n m e n t ar e a

. H o we v e r, b e ca u s e t h e S a n Carl o s Ap ac h e r e s e r v a t i o n is a d j a c e n t t o t h e p r o p o s e d

n o n a tt ai n m e n t ar e a, w e w a n te d t h e T ri b e t o b e a w a r e o f t h is a c t i o n s o t h e y c o u l d p ar t ici p a te i n t h e

r e d e si gn a t i o n p r o c e ss a n d / o r t h e SI P p r o c e ss if t h e y c h o s e t o d o s o

.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, TX 76011-4005

 

No. IV-05-023 May 26, 2005

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov 

Phone: 817-860-8128 

NRC TO HOLD CONFERENCE

WITH ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. FOR PALO VERDE

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will hold a regulatory conference with representatives

of Arizona Public Service Co. on Wednesday, June 1, to discuss an apparent violation of NRC

requirements at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station. APS operates the facility, located near

Wintersburg, Ariz.

The conference will be held from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. in the NRC’s Region IV office in Arlington,

Texas. The public is invited to observe the meeting and will have one or more opportunities to

communicate with the NRC after the business portion, but before the meeting is adjourned. Persons

interested in participating in the conference via telephone can do so by calling (800) 952-9677 and

dialing extension 475 to be transferred to the meeting.

An NRC inspection of Palo Verde this past winter discovered that changes made to the plant’s

emergency action levels apparently decreased the effectiveness of the plant’s emergency plan. The

changes removed direct use of measured radiation levels for the plant’s classification of Site Area

Emergency and General Emergency levels.

“Emergency preparedness is very important to protecting the public’s health and safety,” said

NRC Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallett. “Although the company corrected this problem when

it was brought to their attention, it’s important for us to discuss with APS how this happened and how

they will prevent any recurrence. ”

The company asked the NRC for the opportunity to provide its perspective on the apparent

violation and to offer any other information that they believe the NRC should take into consideration in

making an enforcement decision. No decision on the apparent violations or any enforcement action will

be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made later by NRC officials.

###
#### Edward T. Crowe, Individually and as Sole Executor and Trustee under the Will of Nora G. Haggerty, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v. Harry B. Sale et al., Individually and as Copartners Practicing Law under the Name of Sale & Sale, et al., Appellants.

Present- — -Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ. [See *post,*p. 782.]
§ 2430.11 Further proceedings. ( a ) The determination of an award may be made on the basis of the documents in the record, or the Administrative Law Judge, upon request of either the applicant or the General Counsel, or on his or her own initiative, may order further proceedings. Such further proceedings may include, but shall not be limited to, an informal conference, oral argument, additional written submissions, or an evidentiary hearing.
( b ) A request that the Administrative Law Judge order further proceedings under this section shall specifically identify the disputed issues and the evidence sought to be adduced, and shall explain why the additional proceedings are necessary to resolve the issues.
( c ) An order of the Administrative Law Judge scheduling oral argument, additional written submissions, or an evidentiary hearing, shall specify the issues to be considered in such argument, submission, or hearing.
( d ) Any evidentiary hearing held pursuant to this section shall be conducted not earlier than forty-five (45) days after the date on which the application is served. In all other respects, such hearing shall be conducted in accordance with §§ 2423.14, 2423.16, 2423.17, 2423.19 through 2423.21, 2423.23, and 2423.24, insofar as these sections are consistent with the provisions of this part.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The ACRS Subcommittees on Materials and Metallurgy and on Thermal-Hydraulic Phenomena and on Reliability and Probabilistic Risk Assessment will hold a joint meeting on November 30 and December 1, 2004, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

The entire meeting will be open to public attendance. The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

*Tuesday, November 30, 2004-8:30 a.m. until 5 p.m.*

*Wednesday, December 1, 2004-8:30 a.m. until 12 Noon.*

The purpose of this joint Subcommittee meeting is to discuss the PTS technical basis re-evaluation. The revised technical basis document and peer review comments will be discussed during this meeting. Subject to the satisfactory review by the Subcommittees, this matter will be referred to the full Committee for review during the December 2004 ACRS meeting. The purpose of this meeting is to gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.

Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Dr. Hossein Nourbakhsh (Telephone: 301-415-5622) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted during the meeting.

Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Officials between 7:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. (e.t.). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

Dated: October 26, 2004.

John H. Flack,

Acting Branch Chief, ACRS/ACNW.

[FR Doc. 04-24380 Filed 11-1-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
### §3701. Purposes

The purposes of this chapter are to provide for—

(1) development coordination 1 and implementation of a comprehensive interagency plan to—

(A) monitor and conduct research on the processes and consequences of ocean acidification and coastal acidification on marine organisms and ecosystems; and

(B) maintain and advise an interagency research, monitoring, and public outreach program on ocean acidification and coastal acidification;

(2) maintenance of an ocean acidification program within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration;

(3) assessment and consideration of regional and national ecosystem and socioeconomic impacts of increased ocean acidification and coastal acidification; and

(4) research adaptation strategies and mitigating the impacts of ocean and coastal acidification and related co-stressors on marine ecosystems.

(Pub. L. 111–11, title XII, §12402, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1436; Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title VI, §10642, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1672.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–167, §10642(b), struck out subsec. (a) designation and heading "Purposes" before "The purposes" in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 117–167, §10642(a)(1), substituted "development coordination and implementation" for "development and coordination" in introductory provisions, "acidification and coastal acidification on marine organisms" for "acidification on marine organisms" in subpar. (A), and "maintain and advise an interagency research, monitoring, and public outreach program on ocean acidification and coastal acidification;" for "establish an interagency research and monitoring program on ocean acidification;" in subpar. (B).

Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 117–167, §10642(a)(2), substituted "maintenance" for "establishment".

Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 117–167, §10642(a)(3), inserted "and coastal acidification" after "ocean acidification".

Subsec. (a)(4). Pub. L. 117–167, §10642(a)(4), substituted "mitigating the impacts of ocean and coastal acidification and related co-stressors on marine ecosystems." for "techniques for effectively conserving marine ecosystems as they cope with increased ocean acidification."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2022 Amendment

Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title VI, §10641, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1672, provided that: "This subtitle [subtitle E (§§10641–10649) of title VI of div. B of Pub. L. 117–167, amending this section and sections 3702 to 3708 of this title] may be cited as the 'Coastal and Ocean Acidification Research and Innovation Act of 2021'."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 111–11, title XII, §12401, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1436, provided that: "This subtitle [subtitle D (§§12401–12409) of title XII of Pub. L. 111–11, enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Federal Ocean Acidification Research And Monitoring Act of 2009' or the 'FOARAM Act'."

1 So in original.