alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.1014 Originating goods. Except as otherwise provided in this subpart and General Note 33(n), HTSUS, a good imported into the customs territory of the United States will be considered an originating good under the UKFTA only if: ( a ) The good is wholly obtained or produced entirely in the territory of one or both of the Parties;
( b ) The good is produced entirely in the territory of one or both of the Parties and: ( 1 ) Each non-originating material used in the production of the good undergoes an applicable change in tariff classification specified in General Note 33(o), HTSUS, and the good satisfies all other applicable requirements of General Note 33, HTSUS; or
( 2 ) The good otherwise satisfies any applicable regional value content or other requirements specified in General Note 33(o), HTSUS, and satisfies all other applicable requirements of General Note 33, HTSUS; or
( c ) The good is produced entirely in the territory of one or both of the Parties exclusively from originating materials.
August 8, 2014

By Email

Mr. Robert Fin amore

Division Chief

Foreign Air Carrier Licensing

U.S. Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Application of Aeroenlaces Nacionales, S.A. d e C.V. (d/b/a vivaAerobus) for

an Exemption and Amendment to Permit

, IAH / CUN ( DOT

- OST

- 2014

- 0134 )

Dear Mr. Fin amore

,

vivaAerobus has completed its poll of the U.S. carrier s served with its application of

August 5, 2014 for an exemption and amendment t o foreign air carrier permit pursuant to 49

U.S.C. § 40109 for service between Houston , Texas ( IAH ) and Cancun , Mexico ( CUN )

.

vivaAerobus received non

- objections from each of the carrier s served. We request

expedited approval of our application

.

Respectfully submitted

,

David M. Kirstein

cc: Service List ; Brian Hedburg
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15838 and #15839; CALIFORNIA Disaster Number CA-00296]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of California (FEMA-4407-DR), dated 12/11/2018. *Incident:*
                         Wildfires. *Incident Period:*
                         11/08/2018 through 11/25/2018.
 DATES: Issued on 12/11/2018. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         02/11/2019. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         09/11/2019.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 12/11/2018, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Butte, Los Angeles, Ventura. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.750Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.750*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.750
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 158385 and for economic injury is 158390. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) James Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2018-27553 Filed 12-19-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
### SUBCHAPTER III—AUDITING AND SETTLING ACCOUNTS
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-05-045 November 29, 2005

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC ISSUES CONFIRMATORY ORDER AND REDUCES FINE

FOR RADIATION SAFETY VIOLATION AT LASALLE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff issued an Order confirming commitments made to

the NRC by Exelon Generation Co. and reduced the amount of a fine as part of a settlement agreement

concerning a violation of radiation safety requirements at the company’s LaSalle County Nuclear

Power Station. The plant, which has two reactors, is located near Seneca, Ill.

The violation occurred when four employees of a contractor working at the LaSalle Station

entered a high radiation area without authorization on Jan. 25, 2004. 

NRC investigators determined that the violation was willful in that the foreman and two of the

workers were aware they were not authorized to enter the high radiation area and had not received the

briefing by radiation protection personnel necessary to enter the area.

The workers did not receive a significant radiation exposure. The maximum radiation exposure

received was 5 millirem, which is a small fraction of the NRC limit of 5,000 millirem per year for

workers at nuclear facilities.

The NRC issued Exelon a Notice of Violation and proposed a $60,000 fine on May 2, 2005

(see NRC press release issued May 4, 2005).

On May 12, 2005, Exelon announced its intention to appeal the NRC’s enforcement action

through the use of Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR), a process used to help the NRC and the utility

to reach agreement. 

As part of this process, the utility and the NRC staff met with an independent mediator and

reached a settlement agreement. The utility acknowledged that the violation had occurred and

committed to carrying out extensive corrective action to address the problem.

The NRC reduced the fine from the proposed $60,000 to $10,000 as a result of the utility’s

commitments to improve radiation safety rules, procedures and awareness at the plant. Exelon has

until December 22 to pay the fine.

“The commitments made by the utility to make sure radiation safety rules and procedures are

properly understood and enforced will help the NRC gain stronger confidence that nuclear workers are

protected from excessive doses of radiation at the LaSalle plant,” said James Caldwell, NRC Regional
Administrator. 

The Confirmatory Order to Exelon and other documents related to this case are available from

the Region III Office of Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Enter docket number 05000373 as a search term.

###
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-50236

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Ryan Graves, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:21-CR-306-1

______________________________

Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Ryan Graves has moved for leave 

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Graves has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 11, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-50236 Document: 00516607307 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2023
No. 22-50236

2

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 22-50236 Document: 00516607307 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/11/2023
#### § 358.104 Report.

The Secretary will review and issue a report on the first five years of the operation of Part 358. The report will consider the impact of determinations to permit importation of particular merchandise for use in emergency relief work under this Part, on U.S. parties injured by dumped and/or subsidized imports.
Fourth Department,

April, 1949.

(April 27, 1949.)

#### Edgar H. Mosher, Respondent, v. Michael A. Cicora et al., Appellants.

Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-03-020 March 25, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NEW INSPECTOR NAMED AT VERMONT YANKEE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission Officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have appointed Beth E.

Sienel as the new resident inspector at Vermont Yankee, in Vernon, Vt. The plant is operated by

Entergy Nuclear Generation Company. 

Sienel joins Senior Resident Inspector David Pelton at Vemont Yankee. She replaces Resident

Inspector Ed Knutson, who was reassigned to the Nine Mile Point nuclear power plant in Scriba, N.Y.

Sienel joined the NRC in 1990, and was a Reactor Engineer Intern in the Regional Office in

King of Prussia, Pa. As an intern, she completed several assignments in Region I and in the Office of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation, including an assignment in the Peach Bottom resident office (in Delta,

Pa.). Following completion of the intern program, Sienel was a reactor engineer in the Region I

Systems Section. She has worked as a resident inspector at the March 25, 2003Pilgrim Nuclear Power

Station in Plymouth, Mass., and, most recently, at Millstone Station in Waterford, Conn. 

Sienel is a graduate of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, N.Y., where she earned a

Bachelor of Science degree in nuclear engineering. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They

serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring

significant work projects and interfacing with plant workers and the public.

The resident inspectors at Vermont Yankee can be reached at 802/257-4319.

###
### §575. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–362, title IX, §901(i)(1), Nov. 10, 1998, 112 Stat. 3290

Section, acts July 15, 1955, ch. 369, §5, 69 Stat. 353; Pub. L. 87–818, §1(8), Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 935, related to annual reports to Congress by Secretary of the Interior on anthracite mine drainage and flood control program.
§ 2417.205 Consideration of requests or demands. ( a ) After receiving service of a request or a demand for official records, information, or testimony, the appropriate decision-maker will review the request and, in accordance with the provisions of this part, determine whether, or under what conditions, to authorize the employee to testify on matters relating to official information and/or produce official records and information.
( b ) Absent exigent circumstances, the appropriate decision-maker will issue a determination within 30 days from the date that it receives the request.
( c ) The appropriate decision-maker may grant a waiver of any procedure described by this part where a waiver is considered necessary to promote a significant interest of the FLRA or the United States or for other good cause.
( d ) The FLRA may certify that records are true copies in order to facilitate their use as evidence. If a requester seeks certification, the requester must request certified copies from the Office of the Solicitor at least 30 days before the date that they will be needed.
[81 FR 63363, Sept. 15, 2016]
EXHIBIT 23  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   National Health Realty, Inc. Murfreesboro, Tennessee  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-82737 and Forms S-8 No. 333-61699 and No. 333-127177) of National Health Realty, Inc. of our reports dated March 16, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules, and the effectiveness of National Health Realty, Inc. and Subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K.   /s/BDO Seidman, LLP Nashville, Tennessee March 16, 2007
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

CYMER, INC.
CALCULATION OF
EARNINGS PER SHARE (UNAUDITED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Three Months     Six Months
                                                      Ended           Ended
                                                  June 30, 1997   June 30, 1997
                                                  -------------   -------------
<S>                                                   <C>             <C>
EARNINGS PER SHARE

Weighted average shares of common stock
  outstanding during the period                        14,067          13,980

Assumed exercise of outstanding stock
  options and warrants(1)                               1,280           1,299
                                                  -------------   -------------
Weighted average common and
  common equivalent shares                             15,347          15,279
                                                  =============   =============

Net income                                             $7,430         $11,838
                                                  =============   =============

Earnings per share                                      $0.48           $0.77
                                                  =============   =============
</TABLE>


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Three Months     Six Months
                                                      Ended           Ended
                                                  June 30, 1996   June 30, 1996
                                                  -------------   -------------
<S>                                                   <C>             <C>
PRO FORMA EARNINGS PER SHARE

Pro forma weighted average shares of
  common stock outstanding during the period            8,766           8,766

Pro forma assumed exercise of outstanding
  stock options and warrants(1)                           900             900
                                                  -------------   -------------
Pro forma weighted average common and
  common equivalent shares                              9,666           9,666
                                                  =============   =============

Net income                                             $1,217            $957
                                                  =============   =============

Pro forma earnings per share                            $0.13           $0.10
                                                  =============   =============
</TABLE>

(1) Computed using the treasury stock method.
    See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note: Based on the Company's capital
structure, there is no difference between
primary and fully diluted earnings per share.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-104 August 18, 2003

NRC FINDS RENEWAL OF FORT CALHOUN NUCLEAR PLANT

OPERATING LICENSE ENVIRONMENTALLY ACCEPTABLE

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued its final environmental impact

statement on the proposed renewal of the operating license of Unit 1 at the Fort Calhoun Station

nuclear power plant. In the statement, the NRC staff found there are no environmental impacts

that would preclude license renewal for an additional 20 years of operation.

The Fort Calhoun Station nuclear facility is located 19 miles north of Omaha, Nebraska,

in Washington County. The current operating license for Unit 1 expires on August 9, 2013.

The Omaha Public Power District, the operator of the plant, submitted the application for

the renewal of the license on January 9, 2002.

As part of its environmental review of the application, the NRC held public meetings near

the plant to discuss the scope of the review and a draft version of the environmental impact

statement. Comments were received from members of the public, local officials and

representatives of other agencies.

Copies of the statement are available electronically through the NRC’s Agencywide

Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html , by entering accession number

ML032110191 . Help in using ADAMS is available by contacting the NRC Public Document

Room staff at 301/415-4737 or 1/800/397-4209, or by sending a message to pdr@nrc.gov

via e-mail. The report is also available for public inspection at the NRC’s Public Document

Room, located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

###
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-05-033 July 18, 2005

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING AUGUST 2 AT EUNICE, N. M., TO DISCUSS

 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND SAFETY EVALUATION FOR LES 

 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a public meeting for Aug. 2 in Eunice,

N.M., to discuss the results of the agency’s Safety Evaluation Report and Final Environmental Impact

Statement for a gas centrifuge uranium enrichment facility proposed to be constructed near Eunice by

Louisiana Energy Services.

 The meeting, which will begin at 7:00 p.m. (local time) in the Eunice Community Center, 1115

Avenue I, in Eunice, is designed to provide an opportunity for interested members of the public to hear

a summary of, and to ask questions about, the NRC review of the LES application as presented in the

two reports.

 The SER and FEIS document the NRC staff’s findings during the safety/security and

environmental reviews of the LES application to build the National Enrichment Facility.

 Both documents are available to the public on the NRC website at

www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/ .

 For further information, please contact Timothy C. Johnson, Mail Stop: T-8F42, Special Projects

Branch, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and

Safeguards, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Telephone

(301)415-7299, or E-mail tcj@nrc.gov . 

 ###
#### Pearl Muthig, Appellant, v. Charles Muthig, Respondent.

Plaintiff has appealed from an order of Sullivan County Court which denied her motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff had brought action upon a separation agreement. Defendant’s amended answer, apart from denials, in four separate defenses and a counterclaim, alleges, among other matters, payment as well as fraud in the procuring of the agreement in suit by representations known to her to be false and untrue and made with intent to deceive defendant. The issues were tried at a Trial Term of the County Court and a verdict rendered by the jury in favor of the defendant. The verdict was set aside and a mistrial declared. The record discloses a triable issue of fact. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.
#### Panhellenic House Association, Inc., Appellant, v. S. Charles Savio et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
§ 2424.21 Time limits for filing a petition for review. ( a ) A petition for review must be filed within fifteen (15) days after the date of service of either: ( 1 ) An agency's written allegation that the exclusive representative's proposal is not within the duty to bargain, or
( 2 ) An agency head's disapproval of a provision.
( b ) If the agency has not served a written allegation on the exclusive representative within ten (10) days after the agency's principal bargaining representative has received a written request for such allegation, as provided in § 2424.11(a), then the petition may be filed at any time, subject to the following: ( 1 ) If the agency serves a written allegation on the exclusive representative more than ten (10) days after receiving a written request for such allegation, then the petition must be filed within fifteen (15) days after the date of service of that allegation on the exclusive representative.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[88 FR 62456, Sept. 12, 2023]
NUMBER 13-14-00482-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

STEPHEN FORREST MILLER, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 148th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Stephen Forrest Miller, filed a letter with the Court on August 19, 2014 

which was interpreted as a notice of appeal. On September 8, 2014 appellant filed a 

letter explaining that he did not intend to file a notice of appeal but was merely filing a 

letter of inquiry. We construe appellant’s letter as a motion to dismiss the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we GRANT the 
2

motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and DISMISS

the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing 

will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the

9th day of October, 2014.
§ 1201.52 Public hearings. ( a ) *Closing the hearing.* Hearings are generally open to the public; however, the judge may order a hearing or any part of a hearing closed when doing so would be in the best interests of a party, a witness, the public, or any other person affected by the proceeding. Any order closing the hearing will set out the reasons for the judge's decision. Any objections to the order will be made a part of the record.
( b ) *Electronic devices.* Absent express approval from the judge, no two-way communications devices may be operated and/or powered on in the hearing room; all cell phones, text devices, and all other two-way communications devices shall be powered off in the hearing room. Further, no cameras, recording devices, and/or transmitting devices may be operated, operational, and/or powered on in the hearing room without the consent of the judge.
[77 FR 62366, Oct. 12, 2012]