alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. I-04-051 November 3, 2004

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

THESE MEETINGS HAVE BEEN POSTPONED. SEE PRESS RELEASE DATED

NOVEMBER 5, 2004

****************************************************

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH ENTERGY NUCLEAR VERMONT YANKEE 

TO DISCUSS PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF TWO INSPECTIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold two meetings with Entergy Nuclear

Vermont Yankee on Tuesday, Nov. 9, to discuss the preliminary findings of two recent inspections at

the Vernon, Vt., plant. 

At the first meeting, the NRC will present the preliminary results of NRC’s Special Inspection

regarding two spent fuel rod pieces that were misplaced in the Vermont Yankee spent fuel pool. It will

be held at 3 p.m. in the Governor Hunt House, 320 Governor Hunt Road, in Vernon. The public is

invited to observe the meeting and NRC staff will be available for comments and questions from the

public before the meeting adjourns.

At 6 p.m., the NRC staff will meet with Entergy to discuss the preliminary results of the NRC’s

Engineering Team Inspection at Vermont Yankee. This meeting will be held at Vernon Elementary

School, 381 Governor Hunt Road, Vernon.

The public is invited to observe this meeting between the NRC and Entergy. Before the

meeting is adjourned, the public will have the opportunity to ask the NRC questions or make

statements regarding the Vermont Yankee Engineering Team Inspection. The question and answer

session will end at 10 p.m. The preliminary inspection results will be made publically available prior

to this meeting on the NRC website at http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/plant-specific-items/vermont-yankeeissues.html .

Because the power uprate review is on-going, it would be premature for the staff to engage in

discussion of the power uprate proposal at this time. The staff will discuss the engineering team

inspection scope and results and how the findings from the engineering inspection will be considered

as part of the NRC’s review of Entergy’s extended power uprate request. The staff expects to hold

another meeting in the future to discuss the power uprate when it can engage in more substantive

discussions on the issues.
Signs, banners, posters and displays not larger than 18" x 18" are permitted at NRC meetings;

however, they cannot be waved, held over one’s head or generally moved about in the meeting room

because they are distracting to the participants and audience. Signs, banners, posters and displays

affixed to sticks, poles, and the like are not permitted in the meeting room. 

###
### §7504. Federal agency responsibilities and relations with non-Federal entities

(a) Each Federal agency shall, in accordance with guidance issued by the Director under section 7505, with regard to Federal awards provided by the agency—

(1) monitor non-Federal entity use of Federal awards, and

(2) assess the quality of audits conducted under this chapter for audits of entities for which the agency is the single Federal agency determined under subsection (b).

(b) Each non-Federal entity shall have a single Federal agency, determined in accordance with criteria established by the Director, to provide the non-Federal entity with technical assistance and assist with implementation of this chapter.

(c) The Director shall designate a Federal clearinghouse to—

(1) receive copies of all reporting packages developed in accordance with this chapter;

(2) identify recipients that expend $300,000 or more in Federal awards or such other amount specified by the Director under section 7502(a)(3) during the recipient's fiscal year but did not undergo an audit in accordance with this chapter; and

(3) perform analyses to assist the Director in carrying out responsibilities under this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 98–502, §2(a), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2333; amended Pub. L. 104–156, §2, July 5, 1996, 110 Stat. 1402.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–156 substituted "Federal agency responsibilities and relations with non-Federal entities" for "Cognizant agency responsibilities" in section catchline and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows:

"(a) The Director shall designate cognizant agencies for audits conducted pursuant to this chapter.

"(b) A cognizant agency shall—

"(1) ensure that audits are made in a timely manner and in accordance with the requirements of this chapter;

"(2) ensure that the audit reports and corrective action plans made pursuant to section 7502 of this title are transmitted to the appropriate Federal officials; and

"(3)(A) coordinate, to the extent practicable, audits done by or under contract with Federal agencies that are in addition to the audits conducted pursuant to this chapter; and (B) ensure that such additional audits build upon the audits conducted pursuant to this chapter."
#### § 293.506 Ownership of the Employee Medical Folder.

The EMF of each employee in a position subject to civil service rules and regulations is part of the records of the Office. When the EMF also contains occupational medical records created during employment in a position not subject to the civil service (e.g., with the Postal Service), the EMF is then part of the records of both the Office and the employing agency.
Federal Aviation

Administration

Memorandum

Date: September 1, 2010

To: Docket No. FAA-2010-0831

From: Deandra Brooks

Subject: Proposed Policy Regarding Access to Airports from Residential Property

Industry Briefing

On September 1, 2010, FAA staff briefed interested industry representatives on the FAA’s

proposed policy regarding access to airports from residential property, commonly referred to as

“through-the-fence” access.

An attendee list is attached.

FAA staff presented the attached PowerPoint presentation.

At the conclusion of the presentation, the following questions/statements were made:

Randy Hansen, representing the Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA), thanked the FAA for

engaging aviation users as part of the policy review. He also stated that EAA had hoped the

proposed policy would allow for some new through-the-fence access arrangements to take effect

because every airport and every situation is different.

Greg Pecoraro, representing the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) stated that

AOPA had hoped for some additional flexibility in the future and may want to see the FAA

develop standards for the future. Pecoraro stated that the proposed policy was a strong move in

the right direction compared to the draft Compliance Guidance Letter issued last fall. Pecoraro

also inquired as to when the presentation would be made available to the attendees. FAA

explained that it would be included in the docket at soon as possible.

Al Pollard, representing the American Association of Airport Executives (AAAE), stated that

AAAE recognizes the challenges associated with the issue and agrees that we need to find a

solution that works for everyone. He stated that FAA had put a great deal of consideration into

the proposed policy.

Doug Macnair, representing the Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA), expressed concern

about the possible involvement of the Transportation Security Agency (TSA) in the future.
#### § 2635.305 Disposition of prohibited gifts.

Section 2635.206(a)(1) through (3) may be referenced when determining an appropriate disposition of a gift that may not be accepted under this subpart.
HARRIS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT, Appellant, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS, Appellee. U NOPPOSED M OTION FOR E XTENSION OF T IME TO F ILE APPELLEE ’ S B RIEF Appellee, the Public Utility Commission of Texas, files this unopposed motion to extend the time for filing appellee’s brief for fourteen days to October 12, 2015. 1. The Appellee’s brief is due on September 28, 2015. 2. Appellee requests a fourteen-day extension to October 12, 2015. 3. The press of other business prevents counsel for Appellee from preparing a brief that will be helpful to the Court by the current deadline. Counsel attended and presented at UT’s Advanced Texas AdministrativeLaw Seminar August 31 and September 1, she has a long-planned and paidfor vacation from September 9–15, 2015, and has oral argument in this Court in Entergy Texas, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission , No. 03-14- 00735-CV on September 23, 2015. Thus, she will not be able to 

# NO. 03-15-00386-CV ACCEPTED 03-15-00386-CV 6790344 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/3/2015 4:01:39 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK2

substan ti al ly w ork o n thi s brief u nt il aft er th e September 23, 2 015 o ral arg ume nt. 4. Th is i s th e fi rst requ est A ppell ee has made f

or a n ext ensio n of t i me t o f i l e a pp el l ee’ s br i ef

. 5. Co u n sel f

orH ar ri s C ou n ty H os pi t al Di st ri cth as bee n c on t act ed

an d d oe s n oto pp os e thi s m ot i on f orext en si on o f

t i me t o f i l e a pp el l ees ’ brief. Respectf ul ly su bmitted, KE N PA XT ON Atto rney General of T exas CHA RLES E . ROY Fi rst Assi stan t A

tt orn ey General JA M E S E . DA

VI S Deputy A

tt orn ey General forCivi l Lit igat io n JO N NI E RM A

NN Di vi si on C hi ef En vi ron ment al Pr ot ect io n Divisi on /s/ El izabe th R. B . Sterl ing El iz abeth R . B. St erl in g Ass istant Attorne y G en er al Texa s Stat e BarNo. 1 91 711 003 En vi ron ment al Pr ot ect io n Divisi on Off ic e of the Atto rney General P.O. B ox 1 254 8, MC-0 66 Au sti n, T exas 7871 1-2 548 512.4 63. 2012 512.4 57 -4616 FAX El iz abeth.St erl in g@texasatto rneygeneral .gov C OUNSE L F OR P UBLIC U TI LI TY C OMMISS ION OF T EXA S

Certif ic ate of Confer ence I ha ve c ontacte d couns el for Harris County Hos pital Dis trict, the only othe r pa rt

y i n t hi s c as e. A

pp el l an tDi st ri ctd oe s n oto pp os e the mo t i on . /s/ El izabe th R. B . Sterl ing E l i z ab e t h R
. B
. S t e rl i n g4 Certif ic ate of Serv ic e I hereby cert if

y th aton thi s th e 3rd day of Sept ember 201 5, a t rue an d c or re ctc op y o f

t he f or ego i n g d oc u me n tw as ser v edo n t he f

ol l ow i n g c ou n sel ele ctronically, throug h an e lectron ic filing s ervice, with a cop y b y e mail:
Br uc e S. Pow ers H ar ri s C ou n ty Assi st an tC ou n ty A t t or n ey 101 9 Co ngress, 15th Fl oor Hou ston , Texa s 77002 (7 1 3) 2 74 -5 1 44 (t el eph on e) (7 1 3) 75 5- 89 2 4 (f

ac si mi l e) br u c e.p ow er s@c ao .h ct x. n et A T T OR NEYS F OR H ARRI S C OU NT Y H OSP ITAL D IS TRI CT / s / El izabe th R. B . Sterl ing El iz abeth R . B. St erl in g
### SUBCHAPTER II—PAY AND ALLOWANCES; TRAVELING EXPENSES AND SUBSISTENCE
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00144-CV

In re Farmers Insurance Exchange §

§

§

§

§

Original Proceeding

From Probate Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (07-1675-2-C)

May 23, 2013

Opinion by Justice Gardner

JUDGMENT

This court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be granted. Accordingly, relator’s petition is 

conditionally granted, and this court’s April 29, 2013 stay is lifted. We direct the 

trial court to vacate the final default judgment as it relates to Relator Farmers 

Insurance Exchange. Writ will issue only if the trial court fails to do so within 

fourteen days.
It is ordered that Real Parties in Interest Tawnya Ballard, Jonathan Odom, 

Heather Jamieson, and Sheila Broderick Johnson pay all costs of this 

proceeding, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _________________________________

 Justice Anne Gardner
TN: DT-95-15

To: NRC Management Directives Custodians

Subject: Elimination of Management Directive 10.4, “Military Duty:

Restoration and Other Actions”

Purpose: Directive and Handbook 10.4 (formerly Manual Chapter and

Appendix 4116, as well as its associated Bulletin No.

4116-160) are being eliminated.

Note: Please remove material under Tab 10.4 and

discard. Do not remove Tab 10.4; it must remain in

place as a reserved number.

Applicable law and regulations govern. Other appropriate

guidance such as Comptroller General decisions also

provide guidance. Agency regulations would be redundant.

Office of Origin: Office of Personnel

Contact: David Woodend, 415-7102

Date Approved: August 21, 1995

Volume: 10 Personnel Management

Part: 1 Employment and Staffing

Directive: 10.4 [RESERVED]

Availability: None

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

DIRECTIVE TRANSMITTAL

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

C.E.H., a child

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 3527

[ August 3, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; James L. Martz , Judge; L.T. Case No. 16CJ001148AMB

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin Eisenberg, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L.

Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney Ge neral, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR

, D AMOORGIAN , and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Village of Lawrence, Respondent, v. Ruth I. Greenwood et al., Defendants, and Lawrence-Pinewood Corp. et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Holán, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ.
§ 1631.9 Responses—form and content. ( a ) When a requested record has been identified and is available, the FOIA officer shall notify the person making the request as to where and when the record is available for inspection or that copies will be made available. The notification shall also provide the requestor with an estimated amount of fees assessed under § 1631.13 of this part, including a breakdown of the fees for search, review, and/or duplication.
( b ) A denial or partial denial of a request for a record shall be in writing signed by the FOIA Officer and shall include: ( 1 ) The name and title of the person making the determination;
( 2 ) A statement of fees assessed, if any; and
( 3 ) A reference to the specific exemption under the FOIA authorizing the withholding of the record, and a brief explanation of how the exemption applies to the record withheld; or
( 4 ) If appropriate, a statement that, after diligent effort, the requested records have not been found or have not been adequately examined during the time allowed by § 1631.8, and that the denial will be reconsidered as soon as the search or examination is complete; and
( 5 ) A statement that the denial may be appealed to the Executive Director within 90 calendar days of receipt of the denial or partial denial, that the requestor has the option to contact the Agency's FOIA Liaison at *frtibfoialiaison@tsp.gov ,* and that the requestor has the option to contact the Office of Government Information Service (OGIS) as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation.
( c ) If, after diligent effort, existing requested records have not been found, or are known to have been destroyed or otherwise disposed of, the FOIA Officer shall so notify the requester.
[55 FR 41052, Oct. 9, 1990, as amended at 79 FR 68094, Nov. 14, 2014; 82 FR 24827, May 31, 2017]
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1313 Prepped byLaTeiaShed



### Document

Number: 

# 56 ) ll-B-3 0 Docket Number: 

# A-88-0 2

Printed 6/12/20089:03:29AM

Sheet 56 of 99P. 2 

## A-88-0 2

Informatio n o n healt ho r ris k assessmen t wa s remove d from th e docket . Thi s informatio nwa s compile d befor e th e Clea nAi r Ac t Amendment s (1990 ) bu t wa s no t use d i nth e developmen t o f th e chromiu

m NESHAP .
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bio Medica Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on August __, 2004 (the  "Report"),  I,
Edmund M. Jaskiewicz,  President of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



                                    /s/ Edmund M. Jaskiewicz
                                    ------------------------
                                    President


                                    August 10, 2004
H. R. 1625

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1114 Main

Avenue in Clifton, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Robert P. Hammer Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

1114 Main Avenue in Clifton, New Jersey, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Robert P. Hammer Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert

P. Hammer Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7343** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. KALVIN MARSHALL , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis trict of Virginia , at Richmond
. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:02

- cr - 00225

- HEH

- 2 )

Submitted : February 24, 2011 Decided: March 3, 2011

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion
.
Kalvin Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. David Thomas Ma g uire, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kalvin Marshall appeals the district court ’ s order denyi ng relief on his motion for reduction of sentence , 1 8
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Marshall , No. 3:02

- cr - 00225

- HE H

- 2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 8, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-14-00067-CR

____________________

DAPHNE OCTAVIA SPURLOCK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_________________________________ ______________________ 

On Appeal from the 435th District Court 

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13-12-13492 CR 

____________________________________________ ____________ 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

A jury convicted Daphne Octavia Spurlock of injury to a child and 

sentenced Spurlock to forty years in prison. Spurlock’s appellate counsel filed a 

brief that presents counsel’s professional evaluation of the record and concludes 

Spurlock’s appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); 

High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). We granted an extension 

of time for Spurlock to file a pro se brief, but we received no response from 

Spurlock. We have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous. We have 
2

independently examined the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record, and we agree 

that no arguable issues support an appeal. We find it unnecessary to order 

appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 

S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s judgment.1

 

AFFIRMED.

 ________________________________

 STEVE McKEITHEN

 Chief Justice

Submitted on September 11, 2014

Opinion Delivered September 24, 2014

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

 1

Spurlock may challenge our decision by filing a petition for discretionary 

review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1521 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1521

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 16, 2003

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To provide for additional lands to be included within the boundary of 
the Johnstown Flood National Memorial in the State of Pennsylvania, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Johnstown Flood National Memorial 
Boundary Adjustment Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. BOUNDARY OF JOHNSTOWN FLOOD NATIONAL MEMORIAL.

    The boundary of the Johnstown Flood National Memorial 
(``Memorial'') is modified to include the area as generally depicted on 
the map entitled ``Johnstown Flood National Memorial, Cambria County, 
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania'', numbered N.E.R.O. 427/80,008 and dated 
June, 2003. The map shall be on file and available for inspection in 
the appropriate offices of the National Park Service, Department of the 
Interior.

SEC. 3. ACQUISITION OF LANDS.

    The Secretary of the Interior (``Secretary'') is authorized to 
acquire from willing sellers the land or interests in land as described 
in section 2 by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds, 
or exchange.

SEC. 4. ADMINISTRATION OF LANDS.

    Lands added to the Memorial by section 2 shall be administered by 
the Secretary as part of the Memorial in accordance with applicable 
laws and regulations.

SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    In addition to amounts otherwise made available for land 
acquisition, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may 
be necessary to carry out the purposes of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 15, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```