alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §226c. Reduction of royalties under existing leases

From and after August 8, 1946, the royalty obligation to the United States under all leases requiring payment of royalty in excess of 121⁄2 per centum, except leases issued or to be issued upon competitive bidding, is reduced to 121⁄2 per centum in amount or value of production removed or sold from said leases as to (1) such leases, or such part of the lands subject thereto, and the deposits underlying the same, as are not believed to be within the productive limits of any oil or gas deposit, as such productive limits are found by the Secretary to exist on August 8, 1946, and (2) any production on a lease from an oil or gas deposit which was discovered after May 27, 1941, by a well or wells drilled within the boundaries of the lease, and which is determined by the Secretary to be a new deposit; and (3) any production on or allocated to a lease pursuant to an approved unit or cooperative agreement from an oil or gas deposit which was discovered after May 27, 1941, on land committed to such agreement, and which is determined by the Secretary to be a new deposit, where such lease was included in such agreement at the time of discovery, or was included in a duly executed and filed application for the approval of such agreement at the time of discovery.

(Aug. 8, 1946, ch. 916, §12, 60 Stat. 957.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

See note set out under section 181 of this title.

#### Outer Continental Shelf; Refunds on Mineral-Lease Payments

Refunds of excess payments with respect to oil, gas, and other leases on submerged lands of outer Continental Shelf, see section 1339 of Title 43, Public Lands.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Emphasis Panel; Amelogenesis Model-Special Emphasis Panel.                     

*Date:*                         February 28, 2019.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Yun Mei, MD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, NIDCR, NIH, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite #670, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-827-4639,                         *yun.mei@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 13, 2018.

Natasha M. Copeland,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-27377 Filed 12-18-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00176-CR

Quinn Ford, Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 297th District Court

of Tarrant County (1267457D)

May 28, 2015

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot______________

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21


                              FIRST SUPPLEMENT TO
                       APPENDIX A TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                        BETWEEN STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
                                       AND
                              RANDALL L. STRICKLIN


                  BASE SALARY, BONUS COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS



1.   Effective May 1, 2002, Employee's title(s) shall be Senior Vice President
     and President-Western Division, Employee's Base Salary shall be $275,000,
     and Employee's principal work location shall be the Los Angeles, California
     metropolitan area.


2.   For Fiscal Year 2002 ("FY 2002"), the Employee shall be eligible to receive
     a Bonus of up to $262,500.


     [Items 2(a) through (c) and 3 are unaffected by this Supplement.]






                                             Agreed to and accepted:



                                             STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.

     Date:  April __, 2002                   By: /s/ JAMES W. McFARLAND
                                                 ----------------------
                                                 James W. McFarland
                                                 Compensation Committee Chairman


                                             EMPLOYEE:

     Date:  April 30, 2002                   /s/ RANDALL L. STRICKLIN
                                             ------------------------
                                             Randall L. Stricklin
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 21, 2011 

t1114 

Order 

 

November 21, 2011 

143678 

LARRY ANIEL, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143678 

 COA: 297901 

Oakland CC: 2009-104197-NO 

CITY OF PONTIAC, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 1650.43 [Reserved]
### §5113. Tolerances and testing of coins

(a) The Secretary of the Treasury may prescribe reasonable manufacturing tolerances for specifications in section 5112 of this title (except for specifications that are limits) for the dollar, half dollar, quarter dollar, and dime coins. The weight of the 5-cent coin may vary not more than 0.194 gram. The weight of the one-cent coin may vary not more than 0.13 gram. Any gold coin issued under section 5112 of this title shall contain the full weight of gold stated on the coin.

(b) The Secretary shall keep a record of the kind, number, and weight of each group of coins minted and test a number of the coins separately to determine if the coins conform to the weight specified in section 5112(a) of this title. If the coins tested do not conform, the Secretary—

(1) shall weigh each coin of the group separately and deface the coins that do not conform and cast them into bars for reminting; or

(2) may remelt the group of coins.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 983; Pub. L. 100–274, §4(b), Mar. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 50.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5113(a) | 31:350. | R.S. §3537; Sept. 26, 1890, ch. 945, §1, 26 Stat. 485. |
| | 31:398(5). | July 23, 1965, Pub. L. 89–81, §108(5), 79 Stat. 255. |
| 5113(b) | 31:351. | R.S. §3538; Aug. 23, 1912, ch. 350, §1(last par. words before 7th comma under heading "Assay Office at Salt Lake City, Utah"), 37 Stat. 384. |

In subsection (a), the words "for the dollar, half dollar, quarter dollar, and dime coins" are added because of the restatement. The words "0.194 gram" are substituted for "three grains", and the words "0.13 gram" are substituted for "two grains", for consistency in the revised chapter.

In subsection (b), before clause (1), the words "Secretary shall keep a record of the kind, number, and weight of each group of coins minted" are substituted for 31:351(1st sentence) because of the source provisions restated in section 321(c) of the revised title. In clause (1), the words "deface the coins that do not conform and cast them into bars for reminting" are substituted for "shall be defaced and delivered to the superintendent of melting and refining department as standard bullion, to be again formed into ingots and recoined" for consistency in the revised chapter and to eliminate unnecessary words. In clause (2), the words "if more convenient" are omitted as surplus.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–274 inserted at end "Any gold coin issued under section 5112 of this title shall contain the full weight of gold stated on the coin."
Exhibit 12-1

ENERGY EAST CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

|                                                                              | Calendar Year
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------
|                                                                              |              
|(Thousands)                                                                   | 2007         
|                                                                              |              
|Income From Continuing
  Operations                                           | $251,298     
|Add:                                                                          |              
|Income tax                                                                    | 114,058      
|                                                                              |              
|Pretax Income from
  Continuing Operations                                    | 365,356      
|Fixed Charges                                                                 | 284,736      
|                                                                              |              
|Earnings, as defined                                                          | $650,092     
|                                                                              |              
|Fixed Charges:                                                                |              
|Interest charges, net(1)                                                      | $275,938     
|Interest portion of
   rental charges                                         | 7,204        
|Earnings required to
   cover preferred stock
   dividends of subsidiaries(2) | 1,594        
|                                                                              |              
|Fixed Charges, as defined                                                     | $284,736     
|                                                                              |              
|Ratio of Earnings to
  Fixed Charges(3)                                       | 2.28         
|
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6276

MELVIN CHICHESTER, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versusH. R. POWELL, Warden of the Deerfield Correctional Center; S. D. MAYES, Chief of Security, Deerfield Correctional Center; CAPTAIN BRACEY, Deerfield Correctional Center; CAPTAIN GIBBS, Deerfield Correctional Center; LIEUTENANTGRAVES, Deerfield Correctional Center; LIEUTENANT SPEIGHT, Deerfield Correctional Center; SERGEANT NICKENS, Deerfield Correctional Center; JOHN DOE, I, Correctional Officer, Deerfield Correctional Center; JOHN DOE, II, Correctional Officer, Deerfield Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-95-1055-2) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 3, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Melvin Chichester, Appellant Pro Se.23 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Melvin Chichester filed a c omplaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988), and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Because assessing a partial filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom , 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied , 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and E.D. Va. Loc. R. 28(C)(4), would exceed the statutory filing fee, the district court assessed a partial filing fee in an amount that was ten percent less than the statutory filing fee. Chichester did not pay the assessed fee but instead filed this appeal. This appeal is properly before us. Roberts v. United States Dist. Court , 339 U.S. 844, 845 (1950). Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §4313. Adjustment of House of Representatives allowances by Committee on House Oversight

#### (a) In general

Subject to the provision of law specified in subsection (b), the Committee on House Oversight of the House of Representatives may, by order of the Committee, fix and adjust the amounts, terms, and conditions of, and other matters relating to, allowances of the House of Representatives within the following categories:

(1) For Members of the House of Representatives, the Members' Representational Allowance, including all aspects of official mail within the jurisdiction of the Committee under section 503 of this title.

(2) For committees, the Speaker, the Majority and Minority Leaders, the Clerk, the Sergeant at Arms, and the Chief Administrative Officer, allowances for official mail (including all aspects of official mail within the jurisdiction of the Committee under section 503 of this title), stationery, and telephone and telegraph and other communications.

#### (b) Provision specified

The provision of law referred to in subsection (a) is section 4314 of this title.

#### (c) "Member of the House of Representatives" defined

As used in this section, the term "Member of the House of Representatives" means a Representative in, or a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress.

(Pub. L. 92–184, ch. IV, Dec. 15, 1971, 85 Stat. 636; Pub. L. 104–186, title I, §102, Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1719; Pub. L. 106–57, title I, §103(a)(4)(A), Sept. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 415.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 57 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is based on House Resolution No. 457, Ninety-second Congress, July 21, 1971, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 92–184.

#### Amendments

1999—Subsec. (a)(1), (2). Pub. L. 106–57 substituted "all aspects of official mail" for "all aspects of the Official Mail Allowance".

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section consisted of subsecs. (a) and (b) authorizing Committee on House Administration to adjust certain allowances for Members, committees, and officers of House of Representatives.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on House Oversight of House of Representatives changed to Committee on House Administration of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Jan. 6, 1999.

#### Effective Date of 1999 Amendment

Pub. L. 106–57, title I, §103(c), Sept. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 416, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section and sections 503 and 5321 of this title] shall apply with respect to the first session of the One Hundred Sixth Congress and each succeeding session of Congress."

#### Clerk Hire Allowance; Increase

Pub. L. 101–520, title I, §104, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2262, effective for 102d Congress, increased authorization for the Clerk Hire Allowance by $50,000.
Exhibit 12.1.  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   I, Elek Straub, certify
that:  1.I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Magyar Telekom;  2.Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;  4.The
Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:  a.) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;  b.)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of 
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and  c.)
Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The
Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Companys auditors and the audit committee of Companys board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):  a.)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and  b.)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial
reporting.  Date: May 11, 2005  By:
  /s/ Elek StraubName:
  Elek StraubTitle:
  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-014 January 24, 2005

NRC CALLS FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON DECOMMISSIONING PLAN 

FOR VA’S OMAHA MEDICAL FACILITY REACTOR

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is soliciting comments from the public and state,

local and tribal officials regarding a research/test reactor decommissioning plan submitted by the

Department of Veterans Affairs’ Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System. The operating license

for the reactor was granted to the VA Medical Center in Omaha, Neb., in 1959. The reactor, with a

power level of 20 kW, was permanently shut down in 2001. 

Comments should be provided by Feb. 17, 2005 to: Patrick M. Madden, Chief, Research and

Test Reactors Section, New, Research and Test Reactors Program, Division of Regulatory

Improvement Programs, Mail Stop 012-G13, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.,

20555-0001. 

A copy of the decommissioning plan application (Accession Number ML042740512) is

available electronically through the NRC’s online library, ADAMS, at: http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html . Help in using ADAMS is available from the NRC Public Document Room, at (301)

415-4737 or (800) 397-4209.