31900 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

action is being taken pursuant to section 

179(c)(1) of the CAA, and is consistent 

with the CAA and its implementing 

regulations. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

This action proposes to make a 

determination of attainment based on 

air quality, and would not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. For that reason, 

this proposed action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this proposed 

determination that the Rome Area 

attained the 1997 annual average PM2.5

NAAQS does not have Tribal 

implications as specified by Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000), because the SIPs are not 

approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the states, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on Tribal governments or preempt 

Tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Particulate matter, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: May 23, 2011. 

Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming, 

Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

[FR Doc. 2011–13668 Filed 6–1–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2011–0408–201132; FRL– 

9314–1] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans and 

Designations of Areas for Air Quality 

Planning Purposes; Alabama, Georgia, 

and Tennessee: Chattanooga and 

Macon; Determination of Attainment by 

Applicable Attainment Date for the 

1997 Annual Fine Particulate 

Standards 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to 

determine pursuant to Clean Air Act 

(CAA), that the Chattanooga, TennesseeGeorgia, fine particulate (PM2.5) 

nonattainment area (hereafter referred to 

as ‘‘the Chattanooga Area’’) and the 

Macon, Georgia PM2.5 nonattainment 

area (hereafter referred to as ‘‘the Macon 

Area’’) attained the 1997 annual PM2.5

national ambient air quality standards 

(NAAQS) by the applicable attainment 

date of April 5, 2010. The 

determinations of attainment were 

previously proposed by EPA on March 

22, 2011, and were based on qualityassured and certified monitoring data 

for the 2007—2009 monitoring period. 

The Chattanooga Area is comprised of 

Hamilton County in Tennessee, Catoosa 

and Walker Counties in Georgia, and a 

portion of Jackson County in Alabama. 

The Macon Area is comprised of Bibb 

County in its entirety and a portion of 

Monroe County in Georgia. EPA is now 

proposing to find that both of the aboveidentified areas attained the 1997 

annual PM2.5 NAAQS by their 

applicable attainment dates. EPA is 

proposing these actions because they are 

consistent with the CAA and its 

implementing regulations. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before July 5, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

OAR–2011–0408, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. E-mail: benjamin.lynorae@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (404) 562–9019. 

4. Mail: EPA–R04–OAR–2011–0408, 

Regulatory Development Section, Air 

Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. 

5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Ms. 

Lynorae Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory 

Development Section, Air Planning 

Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Regional Office’s normal hours of 

operation. The Regional Office’s official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal 

holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R04–OAR–2011– 

0408. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail, 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected. The http:// 

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov, your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules 31901 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http:// 

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the http:// 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Regulatory Development Section, 

Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, 

excluding Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara 

Waterson or Joel Huey of the Regulatory 

Development Section, in the Air 

Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Sara 

Waterson may be reached by phone at 

(404) 562–9061, or via electronic mail at 

waterson.sara@epa.gov. Joel Huey may 

be reached by phone at (404) 562–9104, 

or via electronic mail at 

huey.joel@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. What are the actions EPA is taking? 

II. What is the background for these actions? 

III. What is the air quality for the 1997 annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS for the 2007–2009 

monitoring period? 

A. Chattanooga 

B. Macon 

IV. What is the effect of these actions? 

V. What are the proposed actions? 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What are the actions is EPA taking? 

Based on EPA’s review of the qualityassured and certified monitoring data 

for 2007–2009, and in accordance with 

section 179(c)(1) of the CAA and EPA’s 

regulations, EPA proposes to determine 

that the Chattanooga and Macon Areas 

attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS 

by the applicable attainment date of 

April 5, 2010. 

On March 22, 2011, EPA published 

two proposed rulemakings to make 

determinations of attainment to suspend 

the requirements for the Chattanooga 

and Macon Areas to submit attainment 

demonstrations and associated 

reasonably available control measures 

(RACM), reasonable further progress 

(RFP) plans, contingency measures, and 

other planning State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) revisions related to 

attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS so long as the Areas continue 

to attain the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. 

See 76 FR 15895 for the proposed 

rulemaking related to the Chattanooga 

Area; see 76 FR 15892 for the proposed 

rulemaking related to the Macon Area. 

Those proposed rulemakings also 

include useful background information 

on the PM2.5 NAAQS relevant to the 

Chattanooga and Macon Areas. EPA is 

moving forward with final action on the 

proposals to find that the Chattanooga 

and Macon Areas are attaining the PM2.5

NAAQS. Today’s proposed actions, 

however, make determinations that the 

Chattanooga and Macon Areas attained 

the1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the 

applicable attainment date of April 5, 

2010. These actions are not a reproposal of the March 22, 2011, 

attainment determinations to suspend 

the requirements for the Chattanooga 

and Macon Areas to submit an 

attainment demonstration and 

associated RACM, a RFP plan, 

contingency measures, and other 

planning SIP revisions related to 

attainment of the standard. Rather, 

today’s actions are simply focused on 

the date by which the areas had 

attaining data. 

II. What is the background for these 

actions? 

As nonattainment areas for the 1997 

annual PM2.5 NAAQS, the Chattanooga 

and Macon Areas had an applicable 

attainment date of April 5, 2010 (based 

on 2007–2009 monitoring data). 

Pursuant to section 179(c) of the CAA, 

EPA is required to make a determination 

on whether the Areas attained the 

standard by their applicable attainment 

date. Specifically, section 179(c)(1) of 

the CAA reads as follows: ‘‘As 

expeditiously as practicable after the 

applicable attainment date for any 

nonattainment area, but not later than 6 

months after such date, the 

Administrator shall determine, based on 

the area’s air quality as of the attainment 

date, whether the area attained the 

standard by that date.’’ Today’s action is 

EPA’s proposal that the Chattanooga 

and Macon areas attained the annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable 

attainment date of April 5, 2010. 

III. What is the air quality for the 1997 

annual PM2.5 NAAQS for the 2007–2009 

monitoring period? 

Under EPA regulations at 40 CFR 

50.7, the 1997 annual primary and 

secondary PM2.5 standards are met when 

the annual arithmetic mean 

concentration, as determined in 

accordance with 40 CFR part 50, 

Appendix N, is less than or equal to 

15.0 μg/m3 at all relevant monitoring 

sites in the subject area. 

EPA reviewed the ambient air 

monitoring data for the Chattanooga and 

Macon Areas in accordance with the 

provisions of 40 CFR part 50, Appendix 

N. All data considered have been 

quality-assured, certified, and recorded 

in EPA’s Air Quality System database. 

This review addresses air quality data 

collected in the 3-year period from 

2007–2009. The 3-year period from 

2007–2009 is the period EPA must 

consider for areas that had an applicable 

attainment date of April 5, 2010. 

A. Chattanooga 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
31902 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

1The Rossville site did not meet 75 percent data 

completeness for the 2007–2009 time period due to 

roof replacement and subsequent relocation of the 

monitor. Because the site passed data substitution 

analysis, the design value for the Area is the highest 

reading monitor, which is Tombras Avenue. 

2Macon Allied design value considers co-located 

data where primary data are not available. 

3Macon Allied design value considers data 

substitution of 58.1 μg/m3 for all missing data in 1st 

quarter of 2008. 

4Macon SE Annual Mean considers data 

substitution for second and fourth quarters of 2008 

and 3rd quarter of 2009. 

TABLE 1—ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS IN THE CHATTANOOGA AREA (2007–2009) 

Site name Site No. 

Annual average 

concentration 

(μg/m3) 

Tombras Avenue ......................................................................................................................................... 47–065–0031 12.6 

Soddy Daisy High School ............................................................................................................................ 47–065–1011 11.7 

Siskin Drive .................................................................................................................................................. 47–065–4002 12.7 

Rossville ....................................................................................................................................................... 13–295–0002 1 12.3 

As shown above in Table 1, during 

the 2007–2009 design period, the 

Chattanooga Area met the 1997 annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS. The official annual 

design value for the Chattanooga Area 

for the 2007–2009 period is 12.7 μg/m3. 

More detailed information on the 

monitoring data for the Chattanooga 

Area during the 2007–2009 design 

period is provided in EPA’s March 22, 

2011, proposed rulemaking to approve 

the clean data determination for the 

Chattanooga Area for the 1997 annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS. See 76 FR 15895. 

B. Macon 

TABLE 2—ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS IN THE MACON AREA (2007–2009) 

Site name Site No. 

Annual average 

concentration 

(μg/m3) without 

data substitution 

Annual average 

concentration 

(μg/m3) with 

data substitution 

Macon Allied .................................................................................................................... 13–021–0007 213.7 314.9 

Macon SE ........................................................................................................................ 13–021–0012 12.0 413.3

As shown above in Table 2, during 

the 2007–2009 design period, the Macon 

Area met the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS 

both with and without data substitution. 

The official annual design value for the 

Macon Area for the 2007–2009 period is 

13.7 μg/m3. More detailed information 

on the monitoring data for the Macon 

Area during the 2007–2009 design 

period is provided in EPA’s March 22, 

2011, proposed rulemaking to approve 

the clean data determination for the 

Macon Area for the 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS. See 76 FR 15892. 

IV. What is the effect of these actions? 

Today’s actions are only proposed 

determinations that the Chattanooga and 

Macon Areas attained the 1997 annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS by their applicable 

attainment date of April 5, 2010, 

consistent with CAA section 179(c)(1). 

Finalizing these proposed actions would 

not constitute a redesignation of either 

the Chattanooga or Macon Areas to 

attainment of 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS under section 107(d)(3) of the 

CAA. Further, finalizing these proposed 

actions do not involve approving 

maintenance plans for either the 

Chattanooga or Macon Areas as required 

under section 175A of the CAA, nor 

would it find that the Chattanooga or 

Macon Areas have met all other 

requirements for redesignation. Even if 

EPA finalizes today’s proposed actions, 

the designation status of the 

Chattanooga and Macon Areas would 

remain nonattainment for the 1997 

annual PM2.5 NAAQS until such time as 

EPA determines that the individual area 

meets the CAA requirements for 

redesignation to attainment and takes 

action to redesignate the individual 

area. 

V. What are the proposed actions? 

EPA is proposing to determine, based 

on quality-assured and certified 

monitoring data for the 2007–2009 

monitoring period, that the Chattanooga 

and the Macon Areas attained the 1997 

annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable 

attainment date of April 5, 2010. These 

proposed actions are being taken 

pursuant to section 179(c)(1) of the 

CAA, and are consistent with the CAA 

and its implementing regulations. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

These actions propose to make 

determinations of attainment based on 

air quality, and would not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. For that reason, 

these proposed actions: 

• Are not ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Do not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Are certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Do not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Do not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Are not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Are not significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Are not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Do not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules 31903 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, these proposed 

determinations that the Chattanooga and 

Macon Areas attained the 1997 annual 

average PM2.5 NAAQS by its applicable 

attainment date do not have Tribal 

implications as specified by Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000), because the SIPs are not 

approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the states, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on Tribal governments or preempt 

Tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Particulate matter, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: May 23, 2011. 

Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming, 

Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

[FR Doc. 2011–13670 Filed 6–1–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

50 CFR Part 17 

[FWS–R9–ES–2011–0003; MO 92210– 

1113F120–B6] 

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 

and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a 

Petition to Reclassify the StraightHorned Markhor (Capra falconeri 

jerdoni) of Torghar Hills as Threatened 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of petition finding and 

initiation of status review. 

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service, announce a 90-day 

finding on a petition to reclassify the 

Torghar Hills population of straighthorned markhor, or Suleiman markhor, 

(Capra falconeri jerdoni or C. f. 

megaceros) from endangered to 

threatened under the Endangered 

Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). 

Based on our review, we find that the 

petition presents substantial scientific 

or commercial information indicating 

that reclassifying this subspecies of 

markhor in the Torghar Hills of Pakistan 

may be warranted. Therefore, with the 

publication of this notice, we are 

initiating a review of the status of the 

entire subspecies to determine if the 

petitioned action is warranted. To 

ensure that this status review is 

comprehensive, we are requesting 

scientific and commercial data and 

other information regarding the straighthorned markhor or the Torghar Hills 

population. Based on the status review, 

we will issue a 12-month finding on the 

petition, which will address whether 

the petitioned action is warranted, as 

provided in section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act. 

DATES: To allow us adequate time to 

conduct this review, we request that we 

receive information on or before August 

1, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit 

information by one of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Search for docket 

FWS–R9–ES–2011–0003 and then 

follow the instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public 

Comments Processing, Attn: FWSFWS–R9–ES–2011–0003; Division of 

Policy and Directives Management; U.S. 

Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. 

Fairfax Drive, MS 2042–PDM; 

Arlington, VA 22203. 

We will post all information received 

on http://www.regulations.gov. This 

generally means that we will post any 

personal information you provide us 

(see the Information Solicited section 

below for more details). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Janine Van Norman, Chief, Branch of 

Foreign Species, Endangered Species 

Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 

4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Room 420, 

Arlington, VA 22203; telephone 703– 

358–2171; facsimile 703–358–1735. If 

you use a telecommunications device 

for the deaf (TDD), please call the 

Federal Information Relay Service 

(FIRS) at 800–877–8339. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Information Solicited 

When we make a finding that a 

petition presents substantial 

information indicating that reclassifying 

a species may be warranted, we are 

required to promptly review the status 

of the species (status review). For the 

status review to be complete and based 

on the best available scientific and 

commercial information, we request 

information on the straight-horned 

markhor from the public, governmental 

agencies, Tribal communities, the 

scientific community, industry, and any 

other interested parties. We seek 

information on: 

(1) The straight-horned markhor’s 

biology, range, and population trends, 

including: 

(a) Habitat requirements for feeding, 

breeding, and sheltering; 

(b) Genetics and taxonomy on Capra 

falconeri jerdoni and C. f. megaceros to 

determine if these two subspecies 

constitute a single subspecies; 

(c) Historical and current range 

including distribution patterns; 

(d) Intermountain movement; 

(e) Historical and current population 

levels, and current and projected trends; 

and 

(f) Past and ongoing conservation 

measures for the subspecies, its habitat, 

or both. 

(g) Information on the straight-horned 

markhor subspecies for the purpose of 

determining if the markhor in the 

Torghar Hills constitutes a distinct 

vertebrate population segment (DPS; see 

Evaluation of Listable Entities). 

(2) The factors that are the basis for 

making a listing/delisting/downlisting 

determination for a species under 

section 4(a) of the Endangered Species 

Act of 1973, as amended (Act) (16 

U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), which are: 

(a) The present or threatened 

destruction, modification, or 

curtailment of its habitat or range; 

(b) Overutilization for commercial, 

recreational, scientific, or educational 

purposes; 

(c) Disease or predation; 

(d) The inadequacy of existing 

regulatory mechanisms; or 

(e) Other natural or manmade factors 

affecting its continued existence. 

(3) Information on whether changing 

climatic conditions are affecting the 

subspecies or its habitat. 

Please include sufficient information 

with your submission (such as scientific 

journal articles or other publications) to 

allow us to verify any scientific or 

commercial information you include. 

We will base our status review on the 

best scientific and commercial 

information available, including all 

information we receive during the 

public comment period. Please note that 

comments merely stating support for or 

opposition to the action under 

consideration without providing 

supporting information, although noted, 

will not be considered in making a 

determination, as section 4(b)(1)(A) of 

the Act directs that determinations as to 

whether any species is an endangered or 

threatened species must be made ‘‘solely 

on the basis of the best scientific and 

commercial data available.’’ At the 

conclusion of the status review, we will 

issue the 12-month finding on the 

petition, as provided in section 

4(b)(3)(B) of the Act. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS