alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
1997 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH JUNE 30,
1997 FORM 10-Q FILING
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,829,488
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,906
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,009,661
<PP&E>                                      25,829,450
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,838,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,030,835
<BONDS>                                      6,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,660
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,038,830
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,838,519
<SALES>                                        556,947
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,849,428
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               569,623
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,279,805
<INCOME-TAX>                                   452,725
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            827,080
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 85,771
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   912,851
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1



 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Planet Polymer Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, H. M. Busby, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  June 17, 2004

/s/ H. M. Busby
-----------------------------
H. M. Busby
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 159
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93023, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 159.58 Dumping and countervailing duties; action by Center director. ( a ) *Antidumping matters.* Upon receipt of notification from the Commissioner, the Center director will suspend liquidation on merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, on or after the date of publication of the “Notice of Preliminary Affirmative Antidumping Determination,” “Notice of Final Affirmative Antidumping Determination” or “Notice of Violation of Agreement” as provided by part 351, chapter III, of this title. The Center director will immediately notify the importer, consignee, or agent of each entry of merchandise in question with respect to which liquidation is suspended. The notice will indicate the relevant ascertained and determined or estimated antidumping duty.
( b ) *Countervailing matters.* Upon receipt of notification from the Commissioner, the Center director will suspend liquidation on merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, on or after the date of publication of the “Notice of Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination,” “Notice of Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination” or “Notice of Violation of Agreement,” as provided by part 351, Chapter III, of this title. The Center director will immediately notify the importer, consignee, or agent of each entry of merchandise in question with respect to which liquidation is suspended. The notice will indicate the relevant ascertained and determined or estimated countervailing duty.
[CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93023, Dec. 20, 2016, as amended by CBP Dec. No. 17-08, 82 FR 35065, July 28, 2017]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1572 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 598
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1572

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 4, 2003

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

                             June 24, 2004

               Reported by Mr. Inhofe, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the United States courthouse located at 100 North Palafox 
 Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ``Winston E. Arnow United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 100 North Palafox Street in 
Pensacola, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ``Winston E. 
Arnow United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Winston E. 
Arnow United States Courthouse''.

                                                       Calendar No. 598

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1572

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located at 100 North Palafox 
 Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ``Winston E. Arnow United States 
                             Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 24, 2004

                       Reported without amendment
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 29, 2017

No. 04-17-00670-CV

Dessiree Shvonne MARSHALL,

Appellant

v.

Bonnie MULLER,

Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-20521

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On November 28, 2017, we ordered appellant to provide written proof of payment for the 

reporter’s record. On December 8, 2017, Appellant timely responded with proof of payment. 

Three days later, on December 11, 2017, the complete reporter’s record was filed. Accordingly, 

Appellant’s brief is due on January 10, 2018.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of December, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
### §1484. Interpretation and administration; other right, duty, privilege, or immunity and other remedy unaffected

This chapter shall be interpreted and administered in a manner consistent with the convention, the protocol, and other international law. Except as specifically provided, nothing in this chapter may be interpreted to prejudice any otherwise applicable right, duty, privilege, or immunity or deprive any country or person of any remedy otherwise applicable.

(Pub. L. 93–248, §15, Feb. 5, 1974, 88 Stat. 10; Pub. L. 95–302, §1(6), June 26, 1978, 92 Stat. 345.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–302 inserted ", the protocol," after "convention".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 95–302, see section 2 of Pub. L. 95–302, set out as a note under section 1487 of this title.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1452

To provide that the language of the text of United States passports is 

written in English and Spanish. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2003

Mr. SESSIONS (for himself, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. BRADY of Texas, and Mr. 

SULLIVAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations 

A BILL

To provide that the language of the text of United States 

passports is written in English and Spanish.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LANGUAGE OF UNITED STATES PASSPORTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, the language of the text of all regular United 

6 States passports shall be written in English and Spanish. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall take ef8 fect one year after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
### §§663, 664. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–58, title X, §1009(a)(1)(C), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 934

Section 663, Pub. L. 86–599, §3, July 7, 1960, 74 Stat. 336, related to advisory committees appointed under provisions of chapter.

Section 664, Pub. L. 86–599, §4 (part), July 7, 1960, 74 Stat. 336, related to appointment of Director of Coal Research.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001067701
<NAME> United Rentals, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          20,410
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  274,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                    41,201
<INVENTORY>                                     70,994
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,737,389
<DEPRECIATION>                                 408,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,634,663
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,314,574
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          300,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           684
<OTHER-SE>                                     725,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,634,663
<SALES>                                      1,220,282
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,220,282
<CGS>                                          226,174
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  796,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (4,906)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                22,530
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,157
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 78,297
<INCOME-TAX>                                    43,499
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,798
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 21,337
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,461
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
        

</TABLE>
#### § 177.0 Scope.

This part relates to the issuance of rulings to importers and other interested persons by the CBP, other than advance rulings under Article 509 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (see subpart I of part 181 of this chapter). It describes the situations in which a ruling may be requested, the procedures to be followed in requesting a ruling, the conditions under which a ruling will be issued, the effect of a ruling when it is issued, and the publication of rulings in the Customs Bulletin. The rulings issued under the provisions of this part will usually be prospective in application and, consequently, will usually not relate to specific matters or situations presently or previously under consideration by any CBP field office. Accordingly, the rulings requested under the provisions of this part should be distinguished from the administrative rulings, determinations, or decisions which may be requested under procedures set forth elsewhere in this chapter, including, but not limited to, those set forth in part 12 (relating to submissions of proof of admissibility of articles detained under section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1307)), part 103 (relating to disclosure of information in Customs files), subpart C of part 152 (relating to determinations concerning the dutiable value of merchandise by Customs field officers), part 153 (relating to enforcement of the Antidumping Act, 1921, as amended), part 159 (insofar as it relates to countervailing duties), part 171 (relating to fines, penalties, and forfeitures), part 172 (relating to liquidated damages), part 174 (relating to protests), and part 175 (relating to petitions filed by American manufacturers, producers, or wholesalers pursuant to section 516 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended). Nor do the provisions of part 177 apply to requests for decisions of an operational, administrative, or investigative nature which are properly within the cognizance of a CBP Headquarters Office other than Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade.

[T.D. 80-285, 45 FR 80103, Dec. 3, 1980, as amended by T.D. 84-149, 49 FR 28699, July 16, 1984; T.D. 89-74, 54 FR 31515, July 31, 1989; T.D. 94-1, 58 FR 69473, Dec. 30, 1993; 89 FR 52379, June 24, 2024]
### §161. Entry of building-stone lands; previous law unaffected

Any person authorized to enter lands under the mining laws of the United States may enter lands that are chiefly valuable for building stone under the provisions of the law in relation to placer mineral claims. Lands reserved for the benefit of the public schools or donated to any State shall not be subject to entry under this section. Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to repeal section 471 of title 16 relating to the establishment of national forests.

(Aug. 4, 1892, ch. 375, §§1, 3, 27 Stat. 348.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 471 of title 16, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §704(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792, effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976.

#### Codification

First two sentences of this section are from section 1 and last sentence of this section is from section 3 of act Aug. 4, 1892.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1478 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1478

  To provide that private land use rules be treated as State or local 
 regulation for purposes of certain Federal Communications Commission 
                              regulations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 27, 2003

 Mr. Israel (for himself, Mr. Walden of Oregon, Mr. Ross, Mr. Tiberi, 
Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Berry, Ms. Baldwin, Mrs. McCarthy of New 
  York, Mr. Moore, Mr. Taylor of North Carolina, Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of 
   Virginia, Mr. Boucher, Mr. McNulty, and Mr. Hall) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide that private land use rules be treated as State or local 
 regulation for purposes of certain Federal Communications Commission 
                              regulations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Amateur Radio Emergency 
Communications Consistency Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF PRIVATE LAND USE RULES AS LOCAL REGULATION.

    For purposes of the Federal Communications Commission's regulation 
relating to station antenna structures in the amateur radio services 
(47 CFR 97.15), any private land use rules applicable to such 
structures shall be treated as a State or local regulation and shall be 
subject to the same requirements and limitations as a State or local 
regulation.
                                 <all>
```
### §74a–13. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 74a–13 was editorially reclassified as section 5162 of this title.
### §74a–12. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 74a–12 was editorially reclassified as section 5124 of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 20, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 14, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 495 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2019-47, CP2019-51.                

Elizabeth Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2018-27496 Filed 12-19-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT
32.1

Certification
of Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Dean M.
Leavitt,  Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Wireless Data, Inc.,  hereby certify,  to my
knowledge,  that the quarterly report on  Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 of
U.S.  Wireless Data,  Inc. (the Form 10-QSB) fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information  contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,  in  all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of U.S. Wireless Data, Inc.

Dated: November
13, 2003

| | /s/
Dean M. Leavitt
Dean M. Leavitt
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
§ 1600.14 Effect of election to be covered by BRS. ( a ) If a uniformed service member elects to be covered by BRS, the member may make a contribution election at any time.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) If the member had elected to make TSP contributions while not covered by BRS, the election remains effective until the member makes a new election.
( d ) Agency automatic (1%) contributions for all members covered under this section and, if applicable, agency matching contributions attributable to employee contributions must begin at the time set forth in § 1600.19(c).
[82 FR 60102, Dec. 19, 2017, as amended at 87 FR 31672, May 24, 2022]
#### William E. NICHOLSON-EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joyce K. CONLEY; Kathleen Hawk, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons; John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-6343.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 23, 2002.

William E. Nicholson-El, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*101PER CURIAM.

William E. Nicholson-El appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Nicholson-El v. Conley,*No. CA-01-798 (S.D.W.Va. Jan. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*