alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
May21,2015

U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 400 7th Street, SW RoomPL401 Washington, DC 20591-0001 

# allegiant·

Subject: Exemption Extension Request**~** :

. .**~-**

Exemption No. 10798 dated June 14,2013 from 14 CFRPart 91.203 (a) and (b), and 121.153 (a) (1). 

### Sections of 14 CFRAffected: 91.203 (a): Except as provided in 91.715, no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it has with it the following:

. 91.203 (b): No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthiness certificate required by paragraph (a) ofthis section ora special flight authorization issued under 91.715 is displayed at the cabin

orcockpit entrance so that it is legible to passengers orcrew. 121.153 (a) (1): Aircraft requirements: General. (a) Except as provided 

### in paragraph (c) ofthis section, no certificateholder may operate an aircraft unless that aircraft- (!) Is registered as a civil aircraft ofthe United States and carries an appropriate current airworthiness cy,rtificate issued under this chapter.



### Discussion: Allegiant Travel Company LLC, believes that granting the extension will not affect the aircraft as they continueto beoperated in accordance with an FAAapproved maintenance program and all aircraft are properlyregistered with the FAA. Furthermore, thepublic will continue to benefit as delays or flight cancellations would be eliminated in the event ofa lost ormutilated certificate is discovered. 

### Summary: Allegiant Travel Company LLC, petitions the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an extension of Exemption No. 10798 dated June 14,2013.



## n 

# allegiant Christian Toro 

### IDirector ofQuality/Chieflnspector Allegiant Travel Company 1201 N. Towncenter Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89144 702-830-85301 Cell: 972-514-9121**~-** :1_**~** christian.torof(lallegiantair.cotn I**~ww.allegiantair.com**

## e~~tj) 

## '1 

# is o r deaL

1201 North Town Center Drive 

### I Las Vegas, Nevada 89144
| | Table of Contents

Foreward
Preface
Episode 1, 1962-1963: Distortions of Intelligence
Episode 2, 1963-1965: CIA Judgments on President Johnson's Decision To "Go Big" in Vietnam
Episode 3, 1967-1968: CIA, the Order-of-Battle Controversy, and the Tet Offensive
The Three Episodes in Perspective: Lessons To Be Learned About the Intelligence/Policymaking Relationship
Annex: Examples of . . .
Harold P. Ford
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

Publications Page | CSI Homepage
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BLANCA MARTINEZ,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00267-CR

Appeal from the

 County Court at Law No. 2

of El Paso, Texas 

(TC# 20190C03395)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until April 15, 2020. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Justo Fernandez-Gonzalez, the Appellant’s attorney, 

prepare the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before April 15, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of March, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Barrier Integrity Research Program (NUREG/CR-6861, ANL-04/26)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6861 (PDF - 9.29 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**November 2004**Date Published:**December 2004

**Prepared by:** D.S. Kupperman, S.H. Sheen, W.J. Shack, and D.R. Diercks Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439

P. Krishnaswamy, D. Rudland, and G.M. Wilkowski Engineering Mechanics Corporation of Columbus Columbus, Ohio 43221

M. Srinivasan, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:**Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6869

Availability Notice

## Abstract

In response to the vessel head event at the Davis-Besse reactor, the NRC formed a Lessons Learned Task Force (LLTF). Four action plans were formulated to respond to the recommendations of the LLTF. The action plans involve barrier integrity, stress corrosion cracking (SCC), operating experience, and inspection and program management. One part of the action plan on barrier integrity is an assessment to identify potential safety benefits from changes in requirements pertaining to leakage in the reactor coolant system (RCS). In this report, experiments and models were reviewed to identify correlations between crack size, crack-tip-opening displacement (CTOD), and leak rate in the RCS. Sensitivity studies using SQUIRT (Seepage Quantification of Upsets In Reactor Tubes) were carried out to correlate crack parameters, such as crack size and CTOD, with leak rate for various types of crack configurations in RCS components. A database that identifies the leak source, leak rate, and resulting actions from RCS leaks discovered in U.S. light water reactors was developed. For each leak event, the database provides information on what equipment detected the leakage, how it was determined that the leakage was through the pressure boundary, and what caused the leakage. The sensitivity, reliability, response time and accuracy of each type of leakage detection system were evaluated. Acoustic emission crack monitoring systems for the detection of crack initiation and growth before a leak occurs were also considered. New approaches to the detection of a leak in the reactor head region by monitoring boric-acid aerosols were also considered. Infrared spectroscopy could be used for this purpose. The focus of the report is on the available technologies.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
----

*Sarbanes-Oxley Act of        2002*

| 1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the *Securities Exchange Act of 1934*;                  and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the Company                  for the periods presented. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                  Jean Paul Roy                     |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                   |   |
|                                                   |   |
| Jean                  Paul Roy                         |   |
| President                  and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| November                  14, 2007                     |   |

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 8, 2022

No. 04-22-00551-CV

THE CITY OF CASTLE HILLS,

Appellant

v.

Jenifer Ashley Andrea ROBINSON, et al,

Appellees

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-CI-22569

Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellees have filed a motion for a thirty-day extension of time to file a brief. We grant 

in part the motion and order appellees’ brief filed by November 28, 2022. Because of the time 

constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will 

be disfavored.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of November, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,750
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,111
<ALLOWANCES>                                       123
<INVENTORY>                                      1,051
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,338
<PP&E>                                           8,457
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,877
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,507
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            54
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,736
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,526
<SALES>                                             44
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,904
<CGS>                                               27
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,613
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  26
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    340
<INCOME-TAX>                                       128
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       212
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
### §74a–6. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §204(17), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1732

Section, Pub. L. 103–283, title I, §101, July 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 1430, provided for transfer of authority over Majority and Minority Printers of House to Director of Non-legislative and Financial Services of House.
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Randall D. Holmes    |
|--------------------------|
| Name:          | Randall D. Holmes |
| Title:    | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                     | (Principal Executive Officer) |
|                     |   |
| Date:               | August 5, 2009 |

| /s/ Jeffrey H. Strasberg |
|--------------------------|
| Name:          | Jeffrey H. Strasberg |
| Title:    | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                     | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|                     |   |
| Date:               | August 5, 2009 |

----
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-02-031 June 17, 2002

CONTACT: Breck Henderson E-mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

NRC TO HOLD PRESS CONFERENCE IN BROWNVILLE

ON COOPER SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a press conference on Monday, 

June 24, in Brownville, Neb., to discuss its supplemental inspection effort at the Cooper Nuclear

Station.

The press conference will begin at 1 p.m. in the Brownville Concert Hall, Atlantic Ave. & 2nd

St., Brownville. Elmo Collins, the inspection team manager, and Kriss Kennedy, the team leader, will

be available to answer questions from the media. The supplemental inspection will begin the same

day.

A supplemental inspection is one that is added to the NRC’s normal, or baseline, inspection

program in response to declining regulatory performance. The supplemental inspection at the Cooper

plant will be the most extensive called for under NRC’s inspection program. The purpose of the

inspection is to provide information that the NRC will use to determine the full extent of regulatory

problems at the plant and whether additional agency actions are necessary. 

###
EXHIBIT 32.2







CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Allan J. Kent, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ Allan J. Kent

------------------------





Allan J. Kent

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

November 10, 2004
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert Glaser, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, as amended by this Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A, of RealNetworks, Inc.; and


2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: April 30, 2015








/s/ Robert Glaser


Robert Glaser


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93021, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 151.111 Cigars, cigarillos, and tobacco of Cuban origin.

The tobacco National Import Specialist at the port of New York shall have general supervision of the examination of (a) all cigars or cigarillos which may be made or derived in whole or in part of Cuban articles, and (b) all tobacco which may be of Cuban origin.

[T.D. 81-189, 46 FR 37888, July 23, 1981]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63177-63178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24205]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-1088 (Preliminary)]


Polyvinyl Alcohol From Taiwan

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject 
investigation, the United States International Trade Commission 
(Commission) determines, pursuant to section 733(a) of the Tariff Act 
of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673b(a)) (the Act), that there is no reasonable 
indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured 
or threatened with material injury, or that the establishment of an 
industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of 
imports from Taiwan of polyvinyl alcohol, provided for in subheading 
3905.30.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that 
are alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value 
(LTFV).\2\ \3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioner Hillman did not participate in this 
investigation.
    \3\ Chairman Koplan and Commissioner Miller dissented, having 
determined that there is a reasonable indication that an industry in 
the United States is materially injured by reason of allegedly LTFV 
imports of polyvinyl alcohol from Taiwan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    On September 7, 2004, a petition was filed with the Commission and 
Commerce by Celanese Chemicals Ltd., Dallas, TX, alleging that an 
industry in the United States is materially injured and threatened with 
further material injury by reason of LTFV imports of polyvinyl alcohol 
from Taiwan. Accordingly, effective September 7, 2004, the Commission 
instituted antidumping duty investigation No. 731-TA-1088 
(Preliminary).
    Notice of the institution of the Commission's investigation and of 
a public conference to be held in connection therewith was given by 
posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the 
notice in the Federal Register of September 15, 2004 (69 FR 55653). The 
conference was held in Washington, DC, on September 28,

[[Page 63178]]

2004, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to 
appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determination in this investigation 
to the Secretary of Commerce on October 22, 2004. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3732 (October 2004), 
entitled Polyvinyl Alcohol from Taiwan: Investigation No. 731-TA-1088 
(Preliminary).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 25, 2004.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-24205 Filed 10-28-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
### §6623. Report on telecommunications to Committee on Rules and Administration

The Sergeant at Arms shall report to the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate, at such time or times, and in such form and manner, as the Committee may direct, on expenditures made, and revenues received, pursuant to sections 6621 to 6623 of this title. It shall be the function of the Sergeant at Arms to advise the Committee, as soon as possible, of any dispute regarding payments to and from such Appropriation Account as related to the line item for Telecommunications, including any amounts due and unpaid by any user, if any such dispute has remained unresolved for a period of at least 60 days.

(Pub. L. 100–123, §3, Oct. 5, 1987, 101 Stat. 795.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 58a–3 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1987, see section 4 of Pub. L. 100–123, set out as a note under section 6621 of this title.
#### Ida M. Heath, Appellee, v. City of Chicago, Appellant.

Gen. No. 19,321.

(Hot to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. H. Sterling Pomeroy, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 21, 1914.

Rehearing denied May 5, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Ida M. Heath against City of Chicago for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained *66by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant in maintaining a defective and dangerous sidewalk. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $5,950, defendant appeals.

The grounds urged for reversal of the judgment are: That the verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence; that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence; that the court erroneously refused to submit two special interrogatories to the jury; and that the court erred in the giving and refusing of instructions.

The interrogatories claimed to have been improperly refused are as follows:

“ First. Was the accident occasioned proximately by a defective plan of construction of the place in question?

Second. Was the place of the alleged defect in the same condition on the 17th day of February, A. D. 1911, at the time of the accident as it was at the time of the construction?”

William H. Sexton and N. L. Piotrowski, for appellant ; David R. Levy, of counsel.

Elmer & Cohen, for appellee.

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Municipal corporations, § *1007*
      ***
      *—when city liable for injuries resulting from hole in sidewalk.*In an action against a City for personal injuries resulting from plaintiff stepping into a hole in a sidewalk at the time a trap door was in course of construction, a verdict for plaintiff *held*sustained by the evidence.

2. Trial, § *276*
      ***
      *—when special interrogatories may be refused.*Refusal of court to submit to jury special interrogatories which do not relate to an ultimate fact, and the most that can he said of them is that they relate merely to facts that possibly might tend, more *67or less, to establish the ultimate facts upon which the rights of the parties depend, *held*not error.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

*66Mr. Justice Clark

delivered the opinion of the court.

*673. Damages, § *110*
      ***
      *—when verdict for pergonal injuries not excessive.*A verdict of $5,950 for personal injuries *held*not excessive, it appearing that the plaintiffs hip was broken and the femur fractured and there was evidence tending to show that the injuries will be permanent and that she will never be able to walk without the aid of crutches.

4. Appeal and ebbob, § *1561*
      ***
      *-—when refusal of requested instructions not error.*Refusal of requested instruction covered by other instructions *held*not error.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-04-0229 - International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers' 10 CFR 26.6 Exemption Request

Accession Number: ML043280092

Date Released: Tuesday, February 8, 2005

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML041660022 - SECY-04-0229 - International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers' 10 CFR 26.6 Exemption Request (5 page(s), 12/6/2004)
    - ML043280095 - SECY-04-0229Atch 1- Ltr. to T. Dalzell, IBEW  From: R. P. Zimmerman  Subject: Denial of Exemption Request (3 page(s), 12/6/2004)
    - ML043280099 - SECY-04-0229Atch2 - Background on IBEW Request (2 page(s), 12/6/2004)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer