alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6574. Senate Office of Public Records Revolving Fund

#### (a) Establishment

There is established in the Treasury of the United States a revolving fund within the contingent fund of the Senate to be known as the "Senate Office of Public Records Revolving Fund" (hereafter in this section referred to as the "revolving fund").

#### (b) Source of moneys for deposit in Fund; availability of moneys in Fund

All moneys received on and after October 1, 1989, by the Senate Office of Public Records from fees and other charges for services shall be deposited to the credit of the revolving fund. Moneys in the revolving fund shall be available without fiscal year limitation for disbursement by the Secretary of the Senate for use in connection with the operation of the Senate Office of Public Records, including supplies, equipment, and other expenses.

#### (c) Vouchers

Disbursements from the revolving fund shall be made upon vouchers approved by the Secretary of the Senate.

#### (d) Regulations

The Secretary of the Senate is authorized to prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this section.

#### (e) Transfer of moneys into Fund

To provide capital for the revolving fund, the Secretary of the Senate is authorized to transfer, from moneys appropriated for fiscal year 1990 to the account "Miscellaneous Items" in the contingent fund of the Senate, to the revolving fund such sum as he may determine necessary, not to exceed $30,000.

(Pub. L. 101–163, title I, §13, Nov. 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 1047.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 68–7 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Congressional Operations Appropriations Act, 1990, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1990.
### §6536. Compensation of Financial Clerk of Senate

The Financial Clerk of the Senate may be paid at a maximum annual rate of compensation not to exceed $39,000.

(Pub. L. 93–371, §4, Aug. 13, 1974, 88 Stat. 429; Pub. L. 94–59, title I, §105, July 25, 1975, 89 Stat. 275; Pub. L. 116–94, div. E, title II, §212(a)(3)(A), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2775.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 64a–1 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–94 repealed Pub. L. 94–59, §105. See 1975 Amendment note below.

1975—Pub. L. 94–59, which substituted "$39,000" for "$37,620", effective July 1, 1975, was repealed by Pub. L. 116–94. See above.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2019 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–94 effective on the later of the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2020, or the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after Dec. 20, 2019, see section 212(c) of Pub. L. 116–94, set out as a note under section 282b of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1974, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–371, set out in part as an Effective Date of 1974 Amendment note under section 273 of this title.

#### 1974 Adjustment in Compensation Not To Supersede Adjustments in Compensation or Limitations by President Pro Tempore of the Senate

Adjustment in compensation by Pub. L. 93–371 not to supersede order of President pro tempore of the Senate authorizing higher rate of compensation or any authority of the President pro tempore to adjust rates of compensation or limitations under section 4 of the Federal Pay Comparability Act of 1970, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–371, set out in part as a note under section 273 of this title.

#### Increases in Compensation

Increases in compensation for Senate officers and employees under authority of Federal Pay Comparability Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 91–656), see Salary Directives of President pro tempore of the Senate, set out as notes under section 4571 of this title.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-1672

___________________________

James Charles Fudge

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Grant Harris, Former Warden, ADC, Assistant Deputy Director; Moses Jackson,

Deputy Assistant Warden, Varner Supermax, ADC; James Banks, Warden, ADC;

Randall Watson, Warden, Varner Supermax, ADC; Curtis Meinzer, Former ADC

Deputy Assistant Warden; James Chaney, Security Official, Varner Supermax,

ADC; C. Paskell, Security Official, Varner Supermax, ADC; Justine M. Minor,

Mrs., Disciplinary Hearing Official; Keith Waddle, Mr., Disciplinary Hearing

Official; Stephen Watson, Security Official, Varner Supermax; Jeffrey Andrews,

Security Official, Varner Supermax

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff

____________

 Submitted: December 7, 2016

Filed: December 9, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Arkansas inmate James Fudge appeals the district court’s adverse grant of 1

summary judgment on his due process claim related to his ongoing segregated

confinement. After carefully reviewing the record and the parties’ arguments on

appeal, we conclude that the district court’s decision was proper. See Beaulieu v.

Ludeman, 690 F.3d 1017, 1024 (8thCir. 2012) (grant ofsummary judgment reviewed

de novo); Rahman X v. Morgan, 300 F.3d 970, 973-74 (8thCir. 2002) (discussing due

process requirements related to ongoing confinement in administrative segregation). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Arkansas, adopting the proposed findings and recommendations of the

Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the EasternDistrict

of Arkansas.

-2-
### §875. Emergency shelters; construction; contents; implementation plans

The Secretary or an authorized representative of the Secretary may prescribe in any coal mine that rescue chambers, properly sealed and ventilated, be erected at suitable locations in the mine to which persons may go in case of an emergency for protection against hazards. Such chambers shall be properly equipped with first aid materials, an adequate supply of air and self-contained breathing equipment, an independent communication system to the surface, and proper accommodations for the persons while awaiting rescue, and such other equipment as the Secretary may require. A plan for the erection, maintenance, and revisions of such chambers and the training of the miners in their proper use shall be submitted by the operator to the Secretary for his approval.

(Pub. L. 91–173, title III, §315, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 787.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Effective Date

Section operative 90 days after Dec. 30, 1969, except to the extent an earlier date is specifically provided for in Pub. L. 91–173, see section 509 of Pub. L. 91–173, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Regulations

Pub. L. 110–161, div. G, title I, §112(b), Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2168, provided that: "Not later than June 15, 2008, the Secretary of Labor shall propose regulations pursuant to section 315 of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969 [30 U.S.C. 875], consistent with the recommendations of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health pursuant to section 13 of the MINER Act (Public Law 109–236) [120 Stat. 504], requiring rescue chambers, or facilities that afford at least the same measure of protection, in underground coal mines. The Secretary shall finalize the regulations not later than December 31, 2008."
U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey A venue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Mr. Jason E. Maddux 

Issue date: October 7, 2014 

Garofalo Georlich Hainbach PC Authority expires: October 19, 2014 

1200 New Hampshire Ave, NW 

Suite 590 

Washington, D.C. 20036-6802 

NOTICE OF CONSISTENCY 

Southern Air, Inc. 

is a properly certificated carrier that holds authority to conduct charter operations to and from China. Based on 

a proposal submitted by the carrier, we have determined that the operations comply with the applicable 

Department regulations and the provisions of the 2014-2015 U.S.-China Protocol. 

Number of Flights: one (1) one-way charter

1 

Flight Date(s): October 16-17, 2014 

Points: Shanghai (PVG) - Anchorage (ANC*) - Chicago (ORD) 

Equipment: Boeing 747F 

The U.S. carrier operating the above charter flight should report, in writing, to the U.S. Air Carrier Licensing 

Division (X-44), Office of International Aviation, Department ofTransportation, on its operation for the 

preceding month by the tenth of each month whether the flights operated. 

This notice is valid only for the flight contained in the above program. 

* Denotes technical stop only. 

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at: 

www. regula/ ions. gov 

1 Following our grant of Southern Air Inc. 's request for one (I) one-way charter allocation, 5 1 one-way charter allocations remain 

available in the Zone I charter pool for the 20 14/ 15 charter year.
### §1754. Funding

Effective October 1, 1983, there are hereby authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter, including such sums as may be necessary for the cooperative agreements, contracts, and delegations authorized by this chapter: Provided, That nothing in this chapter shall be construed to affect or impair any authority to enter into contracts or make payments under any other provision of law.

(Pub. L. 97–451, title III, §306, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2462.)
### §6566. Authority to procure technical support and other services and incur travel expenses; payment of such expenses

For the purpose of carrying out his duties under the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 [52 U.S.C. 30101 et seq.], the Secretary of the Senate is authorized, from and after July 1, 1972, (1) to procure technical support services, (2) to procure the temporary or intermittent services of individual technicians, experts, or consultants, or organizations thereof, in the same manner and under the same conditions, to the extent applicable, as a standing committee of the Senate may procure such services under section 4301(i) of this title, (3) with the prior consent of the Government department or agency concerned and the Committee on Rules and Administration, to use on a reimbursable basis the services of personnel of any such department or agency, and (4) to incur official travel expenses. Payments to carry out the provisions of this paragraph shall be made from funds included in the appropriation "Miscellaneous Items" under the heading "Contingent Expenses of the Senate" upon vouchers approved by the Secretary of the Senate. All sums received by the Secretary under authority of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 shall be covered into the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts.

(Pub. L. 92–342, §101, July 10, 1972, 86 Stat. 435.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 92–225, Feb. 7, 1972, 86 Stat. 3, which is classified principally to chapter 301 (§30101 et seq.) of Title 52, Voting and Elections. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 442 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section was enacted as part of Legislative Branch Appropriation Act, 1973.
§ 1209.6 Content of appeal; right to hearing. ( a ) *Content.* Only an appellant, his or her designated representative, or a party properly substituted under 5 CFR 1201.35 may file an appeal. Appeals may be in any format, including letter form, but must contain the following: ( 1 ) The nine (9) items or types of information required in 5 CFR 1201.24 (a)(1) through (a)(9);
( 2 ) Where the appellant first sought corrective action from the Special Counsel, evidence that the appeal is timely filed;
( 3 ) The name(s) and position(s) held by the employee(s) who took the action(s), and a chronology of facts concerning the action(s);
( 4 ) A description of each disclosure evidencing whistleblowing or other protected activity as defined in § 1209.4(b) of this part; and
( 5 ) Evidence or argument that: ( i ) The appellant was or will be subject to a personnel action as defined in § 1209.4(a) of this part, or that the agency has threatened to take or not to take such a personnel action, together with specific indications giving rise to the appellant's apprehensions; and
( ii ) The personnel action was or will be based wholly or in part on the whistleblowing disclosure or other protected activity, as described in § 1209.4(b) of this part.
( 6 ) An appellant who first sought corrective action from the Special Counsel may satisfy the requirements of paragraphs (a)(3) through (a)(5) of this section by filing with the appeal a copy of *Part 2: Reprisal For Whistleblowing* of the complaint form submitted to the Office of Special Counsel (Form OSC-11, *Complaint of Possible Prohibited Personnel Practice or Other Prohibited Activity,* Rev. 8/00), together with a copy of any continuation sheet with answers to Part 2 questions filed with the Office of Special Counsel, and any supplement to Part 2 of the original complaint filed with the Office of Special Counsel or completed by the Office of Special Counsel and furnished to the appellant.
( b ) *Right to hearing.* An appellant generally has a right to a hearing if the appeal has been timely filed and the Board has jurisdiction over the appeal.
( c ) *Timely request.* The appellant must submit any request for a hearing with the appeal, or within any other time period the judge sets for that purpose. If the appellant does not make a timely request for a hearing, the right to a hearing is waived.
( d ) *Electronic filing.* An appeal may be filed electronically by using the Board's e-Appeal site (*https://e-appeal.mspb.gov*) in accordance with § 1201.14 of this chapter.
[55 FR 28592, July 12, 1990, as amended at 65 FR 67608, Nov. 13, 2000; 68 FR 59865, Oct. 20, 2003; 69 FR 57631, Sept. 27, 2004; 77 FR 62375, Oct. 12, 2012; 78 FR 39548, July 2, 2013]
<PAGE>


THIS THIRD ADDENDUM TO THE LEASE, ENDING AUGUST 31, 1997, IS MADE BY AND 
BETWEEN DANI INVESTMENT PARTNERS "LESSOR" AND CONCEPTUS, INC., A DELAWARE 
CORPORATION "LESSEE", TO BE A PART OF THAT CERTAIN STANDARD INDUSTRIAL LEASE 
DATED NOVEMBER 8, 1994 BETWEEN LESSOR AND LESSEE FOR THE PREMISES COMMONLY 
KNOWN AS 1021 HOWARD AVENUE, SAN CARLOS, CA. (AS ATTACHED HERETO AND TOGETHER 
WITH ITS FIRST ADDENDUM THE "LEASE").

Lessee and Lessor hereby agree the Lease is hereby modified and supplemented 
as follows:

1.  SECTION 3. TERM
      The term of the lease shall be extended to encompass the period 
      commencing on September 1, 1997 and ending on February 28, 1998 (the 
      "Extension Period").

2.  SECTION 4. RENT
      The rent during the Extension Period shall be $17,500 per month.

3.  SECTION 5. SECURITY DEPOSIT
      The Security Deposit under the lease shall be increased FROM $14,000 to 
      an aggregate of $17,500 which shall include amounts previously 
      deposited. This additional sum of $3500 shall be due on September 1, 
      1997 when the new lease begins.

4.  EFFECT OF ADDENDUM
      Except as set forth above, the terms of the Lease shall continue to 
      govern the parties' relationship through the Extension Period. In the 
      event of any inconsistency between the terms of this Addendum and the 
      terms of the Lease, the terms of this Addendum shall control. As used 
      herein, the term "Lease" shall mean the Lease, this Addendum and all 
      exhibits referred to in the Lease and this Addendum.

5.  SECTION 15: BROKER'S FEES
      Each party warrants that it was not represented by a real estate broker 
      or agent in this transaction and that no broker's fees are due. If any 
      claim does arise it shall be the lessees obligation.

"LESSOR"                               "LESSEE"

DANI INVESTMENT PARTNERS               CONCEPTUS, INC.
                                       A FTW Delaware Corporation


BY: /s/ Dennis Farrey                  BY: /s/ Sanford Fitch
    --------------------------             ----------------------------


ITS: President   4/22/97               ITS:  Vice Pres. & CFO
     -------------------------             ----------------------------
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies
that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ CHRIS BIEDERMANNChris BiedermannVice President and Chief Financial OfficerJuly 10, 2009
<PAGE>



                             ENVIROTEST SYSTEMS CORP.

                                                                 April 20, 1998


C. Michael Alston, Esq.
9706 Mill Race Estates Drive
Vienna, Virginia 22182



Dear Mr. Alston:

     This letter sets forth your employment arrangement with Envirotest 
Systems Corp. (the "Company"), and amends that certain Separation, Release 
and Waiver Agreement (the "Separation Agreement"), dated as of September 30, 
1997, by and between you, the Company and its affiliates and parents. You 
shall serve as corporate counsel for the Company with the salary and other 
benefits specified in paragraphs 1(a)-(e) and 5 of that certain Separation 
Agreement. For purposes of this letter, the "Separation Date" means the 
date your current employment with the Company terminates.

     You acknowledge that the Company has granted you an option to purchase 
36,667 shares of the Company's Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per 
share (the "Stock") at the exercise price of $6.750 per share pursuant to a 
grant letter dated February 12, 1998 and attached hereto. The Company has 
taken all action required of the Company to authorize the grant of such 
option and the execution and sending of such grant letter.

     In the event of a Change of Control (as defined in such grant letter), 
or, if earlier, upon your termination of your employment for any reason 
(alternatively, the "Trigger Date"), the Company shall (i) pay you, cash lump 
sum in the amount equal to $123,751.13 and (ii) provide you with the salary 
and benefits specified in the first paragraph of this letter for the 
twelve-month period commencing on the date of such Change of Control Trigger 
Date.

<PAGE>

      Please acknowledge that this letter sets forth our understanding of your
employment arrangements by signing below.


                                             ENVIROTEST SYSTEMS CORP.




                                             /s/ Chester C. Davenport
                                             --------------------------
                                             By:
                                             Name:
                                             Title:


     ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO

     /s/ C. Michael Alston
     ---------------------------
     C. Michael Alston
§ 1208.25 Remedies. ( a ) *Order for compliance.* If the Board determines that a Federal agency has violated the appellant's VEOA rights, the decision of the Board (either an initial decision of a judge under 5 CFR 1201.111 or a final Board decision under 5 CFR 1201.117) will order the agency to comply with the statute or regulation violated and to compensate the appellant for any loss of wages or benefits suffered by the appellant because of the violation. If the Board determines that the violation was willful, it will order the agency to pay the appellant an amount equal to back pay as liquidated damages.
( b ) *Attorney fees and expenses.* If the Board issues a decision ordering compliance under paragraph (a) of this section, the Board will order payment of reasonable attorney fees, expert witness fees, and other litigation expenses. The provisions of subpart H of part 1201 shall govern any proceeding for attorney fees and expenses.
§ 1640.4 Account transactions. ( a ) Where relevant, the following transactions will be reported in each individual account statement: ( 1 ) Contributions;
( 2 ) Withdrawals;
( 3 ) Forfeitures;
( 4 ) Loan disbursements and repayments;
( 5 ) Fund reallocations and fund transfers among TSP core funds;
( 6 ) Adjustments to prior transactions;
( 7 ) Rollovers from traditional individual retirement accounts (IRAs) and eligible employer plans within the meaning of section 402(c) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 402(c)); and
( 8 ) Any other transaction that the Executive Director determines will affect the status of the individual account.
( b ) Where relevant, the statement will contain the following information concerning each transaction identified in paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) Type of transaction;
( 2 ) TSP core funds affected;
( 3 ) Amount of the transaction (in dollars); and
( 4 ) Any other information the Executive Director deems relevant.
[87 FR 31680, May 24, 2022]
### §5329. Staff commentaries

The Secretary shall—

(1) publish all written rulings interpreting this subchapter; and

(2) annually issue a staff commentary on the regulations issued under this subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 103–325, title III, §311(a), Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2221.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7833

LUKE AMMON PREACHER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General; LORETTA LYNCH, Attorney 

General,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:15-hc-02073-BO)

Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: April 1, 2016

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Luke Ammon Preacher, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Luke Ammon Preacher appeals from the district court’s order 

denying his petition for a writ of mandamus in which he challenged 

his civil commitment. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Preacher v. Holder, No. 5:15-hc-02073-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2015). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED