alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-109 August 22, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $2,750 FINE

FOR VIOLATIONS AT OVERLOOK HOSPITAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has cited Overlook

Hospital in Summit, N.J. for two violations of NRC requirements.

The staff has proposed a $2,750 fine.

An NRC inspection was conducted at the hospital on May 7, to

review the circumstances surrounding a misadministration of

iodine-131 (I-131) to a patient at the facility two days earlier.

A patient was administered approximately 7 millicuries of iodine131 rather than the intended dose of approximately 2 millicuries.

(A misadministration occurs when the administered dosage differs

from the prescribed dosage by more than 20 percent.)

Based on the information developed during the inspection, as

well as information provided during a predecisional enforcement

conference on July 16, two violations are being cited. Those

violations are: failure to prepare a written directive prior to

administration of a radiopharmaceutical and failure to provide

adequate supervision over licensed activities.

In a letter to the hospital, Region I Adminstrator Hubert J.

Miller said, “Along with the concern that there was a

misadministration, the NRC is concerned that the required written

directive was not completed, as required, prior to the

administration of I-131. This failure to complete the directive

was a contributing factor to the misadministration.”

Mr. Miller added that it was also clear during the

inspection that the technologist was not sufficiently familiar

with the hospital’s quality management program because he did not

know the correct definition of a misadministration. (NRC

requires that hospitals have a quality management program to

provide high confidence that byproduct material will be

administered as directed by the authorized user physician.)

“Clearly, the level of supervision provided by the authorized

users over licensed activities, including the supervision of the

technologist, was inadequate,” Mr. Miller wrote.

The regional administrator also said this misadministration

takes on “added significance because your facility has

experienced two prior misadministrations of iodine-131 for whole

body scans in 1990 and 1991.”

Mr. Miller recognized that the hospital has taken a number

of steps to correct the violations and prevent recurrence,

including retraining all authorized users and nuclear medicine

technologists in quality management plan requirements; developing

a competency examination for all authorized users and

technologists, with a stipulation that no individuals use NRC

material until the examination is passed; and developing specific

sanctions for failure to comply with the quality management plan.

The hospital has 30 days either to pay the proposed fine or

to request in writing that all or part of the penalty be

withdrawn.

#
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 File Nos. 333-87591; 333-95803; 333-90727 and 333-67134)
pertaining to the 1998 Stock Plan, 1999 Directors' Stock Option Plan, the 1998
Stock Option Plan, the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1998 Stock Plan,
Promedix.com Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan, SpecialityMD.com Corporation 1998
Stock Option Plan, NexPrise Inc. 1997 Stock Plan and NexPrise Inc. Non-statutory
Stock Option Agreement with Certain Employees of our report dated February 10,
2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
NexPrise Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2002.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
March 17, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bio Medica Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2005 (the "Report"), I,
Keith E. Palmer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                         /s/ Keith E. Palmer
                                         -------------------
                                         Keith E. Palmer
                                         Chief Financial Officer and
                                         Executive Vice President

                                         May 13, 2005

                                       18
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNatural environment design criteria for the space station program definition phaseThe natural environment design criteria requirements for use in the Space Station and its Elements (SSPE) definition phase studies are presented. The atmospheric dynamic and thermodynamic environments, meteoroids, radiation, physical constants are addressed. It is intended to enable all groups involved in the definition phase studies to proceed with a common and consistent set of natural environment criteria requirements.Document ID19840018672Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsVaughan, W. W.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1984Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:82585NASA-TM-82585Accession Number84N26740Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840018672.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63163-63164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24181]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1550-DR]


Mississippi; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

[[Page 63164]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-1550-DR), dated September 15, 2004, 
and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 20, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Mississippi is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 15, 2004:

    Adams, Amite, Claiborne, Copiah, Franklin, Hinds, Jefferson, 
Lawrence, Lincoln, Pike, Rankin, Scott, Simpson, Warren, and 
Wilkinson Counties for emergency protective measures (Category B) 
under the Public Assistance Program, including direct Federal 
assistance, at 100 percent Federal funding of the total eligible 
costs for a period of up to 72 hours.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-24181 Filed 10-28-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
### SUBCHAPTER III—TRANSFERS AND REIMBURSEMENTS
### §1345. Expenses of meetings

Except as specifically provided by law, an appropriation may not be used for travel, transportation, and subsistence expenses for a meeting. This section does not prohibit—

(1) an agency from paying the expenses of an officer or employee of the United States Government carrying out an official duty; and

(2) the Secretary of Agriculture from paying necessary expenses for a meeting called by the Secretary for 4–H Boys and Girls Clubs as part of the cooperative extension work of the Department of Agriculture.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 925.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1345 | 31:551. | Feb. 2, 1935, ch. 4, 49 Stat. 19. |
| | 31:552. | June 17, 1935, ch. 271, 49 Stat. 387. |

In the section, before clause (1), the word "appropriation" is substituted for "no moneys from funds appropriated for any purpose" in 31:551 for consistency in the revised title. The words "travel, transportation, and subsistence expenses for a meeting" are substituted for "the purpose of lodging, feeding, conveying, or furnishing transportation to, any conventions or other form of assemblage or gathering" to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "to be held in the District of Columbia or elsewhere" are omitted as unnecessary.

In clause (1), the words "agency from paying" are substituted for "the payment of" for clarity and because of section 101 of the revised title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Availability of Appropriations for Expenses of Attending Meetings

Pub. L. 102–394, title V, §505, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1825, provided that: "Appropriations contained in this Act or subsequent Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Acts, available for salaries and expenses, shall be available for expenses of attendance at meetings which are concerned with the functions or activities for which the appropriation is made or which will contribute to improved conduct, supervision, or management of those functions or activities."

Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 102–170, title V, §505, Nov. 26, 1991, 105 Stat. 1141.

Pub. L. 101–517, title V, §505, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2221.

Pub. L. 101–166, title V, §505, Nov. 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 1189.

Pub. L. 100–202, §101(h) [title V, §505], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–256, 1329–287.

Pub. L. 99–500, §101(i) [H.R. 5233, title V, §505], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–287, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(i) [H.R. 5233, title V, §505], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–287.

Pub. L. 99–178, title V, §505, Dec. 12, 1985, 99 Stat. 1132.

Pub. L. 98–619, title V, §505, Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3333.

Pub. L. 98–139, title V, §505, Oct. 31, 1983, 97 Stat. 899.

Pub. L. 97–377, title I, §101(e)(1) [title V, §505], Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1878, 1904.
§ 19.13a Recordkeeping requirements. The proprietor of a manufacturing warehouse shall comply with the recordkeeping requirements of §§ 19.4(b) and 19.12. In addition, the proprietor shall: ( a ) Record all transfers from any storage area to a manufacturing area, and record all transfers from a manufacturing area to a finished product storage area, in the proprietor's inventory control and accounting records;
( b ) Take an annual physical inventory of the merchandise as provided in § 19.12(d)(5) in conjunction with the annual submission required by § 19.12(g); and
( c ) Record all manufacturing operations performed within the warehouse with sufficient detail to determine whether there has been compliance with the manufacturing formula filed with Customs and to permit Customs to audit use and disposition of the merchandise.
[T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41169, Oct. 19, 1984, as amended by T.D. 97-19, 62 FR 15839, Apr. 3, 1997]
### SUBCHAPTER II—ALTERATION OF BRIDGES
**Certification**

I, Peter S. Atkinson, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controlover financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (f) and15d-15 (f)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

b)      Designedsuch internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;

c)      Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedurespresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

d)   Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting.

May 10, 2006

  /S/PETER S. ATKINSON                                Peter S. Atkinson                        Chief Financial Officer
#### John J. Darraugh et al., as Stockholders of Hearst Consolidated Publications, Inc., Suing on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of Stockholders Similarly Situated, Respondents, and Charles A. Crownshield et al., Interveners, Respondents, v. Richard A. Carrington, Jr., et al., Defendants, and Chase National Bank of the City of New York et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Townley, Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED,


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report, or the Report, of Multimedia Games, Inc.
(the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, Anthony Sanfilippo, President
and Chief Executive Officer, and Randy S. Cieslewicz, Chief Financial Officer,
of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that,
based upon each of their respective knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m);
      and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
      February 9, 2009
            /s/  Anthony
      SanfilippoAnthony
      SanfilippoPresident
      andChief
      Executive Officer/s/  Randy S.
      CieslewiczRandy
      S. CieslewiczChief
      Financial Officer




A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Multimedia Games, Inc. and will be
retained by Multimedia Games, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 1850.102 Application.

This part applies to all programs or activities conducted by OSC, except for programs or activities conducted outside the United States that do not involve individuals with disabilities in the United States.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6404

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT NICHOLAS ROSS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, 

at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (3:08-cr-00019-JPB-RWT-1; 3:16-

cv-00078-JPB-RWT)

Submitted: October 11, 2017 Decided: November 2, 2017

Before TRAXLER, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry Philip Beck, POWER, BECK & MATZUREFF, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for 

Appellant. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West 

Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Nicholas Ross appeals the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255 (2012) motion. Ross was sentenced as an armed career criminal to 180 months’ 

imprisonment for his felon in possession of a firearm offense, 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g), 

924(e) (2012).

In his § 2255 motion, Ross challenged the 180-month sentence, relying on 

Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551, 2556-58 (2015) (holding that residual clause 

of Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) is unconstitutionally vague). Although Ross 

clearly stated a challenge to his ACCA sentence, both Ross and the district court at 

various points seemed to conflate Ross’ ACCA sentence with a career offender sentence 

under the Sentencing Guidelines. As a result of this confusion, the district court denied 

Ross relief on the ground that the Sentencing Guidelines are not subject to a vagueness 

challenge under the Due Process Clause, citing the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in 

Beckles v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 886, 895 (2017) .

On appeal, Ross, now with the assistance of counsel, continues to challenge his 

ACCA sentence, asserting that his prior Maryland burglary convictions do not qualify as 

proper predicate offenses supporting an ACCA enhancement in light of Johnson. 

Because the district court appears to have misconstrued Ross’ claim, we conclude that a 

certificate of appealability is warranted. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B), (2) (2012); 

Miller-el v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). Therefore, we grant a certificate of 

appealability, vacate the decision of the district court, and remand the case to the district 

court to allow the court to consider the § 2255 motion as a challenge to Ross’s ACCA 
3

sentence rather than as a challenge to a career offender sentence. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: . ..AD '::2.. 0 I~ - ( t - 0 0 ( -A 0 

With whom outside the FAA bas this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Cessna Aircraft Co. Beth Gamble I Jeny 2/25/20 15 Engineering analysis 

Shoemaker 

Other/Additional Information: 

10
#### §§ 2424.28-2424.29 [Reserved]