alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone 301/415-820

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-054 May 2, 2003

 NRC ISSUES REVISED DRAFT SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT

 ON PROPOSED MOX FACILITY IN SOUTH CAROLINA

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has released a revised draft safety evaluation

report concerning the construction of a proposed mixed oxide (MOX) fuel fabrication facility at

the Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Savannah River site near Aiken, South Carolina.

The revised draft report concludes that DOE’s contractor, Duke Cogema Stone &

Webster (DCS), has not yet met all of the applicable safety requirements pertaining to

construction of the proposed facility in order to provide reasonable assurance of protection

against natural phenomena and the consequences of potential accidents. Specifically, the report

identifies 19 open items on which the NRC requests further information from DCS before a

construction authorization can be granted. These items include questions about nuclear criticality

safety, fire safety, chemical safety, and the confinement ventilation system at the proposed

facility.

The revised draft safety evaluation report represents a snapshot of the staff’s present

positions, based on information received to date. It amends a draft report, issued April 30, 2002,

that responded to DCS’s initial construction authorization request for the MOX facility. DCS

submitted a revised construction authorization request on October 31, 2002. Based on

information contained in that document, the NRC staff has listed as closed 40 items raised in its

earlier draft evaluation.

The revised draft safety evaluation report will be posted on the NRC’s MOX web site, at

http://www.nrc.gov/materials/fuel-cycle-fac/mox/licensing.html . The report will also be

available through the NRC Public Document Room by calling 301-415-4737 or 1-800-397-4209. 

NRC authorization is required before DCS can build a MOX facility designed to convert

surplus weapons-grade plutonium supplied by DOE into MOX fuel for use in commercial

nuclear power reactors authorized to use such fuel. DCS is required to submit a separate

application for a license to operate the proposed MOX facility. Converting weapons-grade
plutonium into MOX fuel is intended to advance the cause of nonproliferation by converting the

material into a form unsuitable for use in weapons. The program is part of a bilateral agreement

between the United States and the Russian Federation that includes construction of a similar

facility in Russia.

###
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Stefan Parker                 |  |
|--------------------------------------------------|--|
|                                             |
| Stefan                Parker                     |
| Chief                Financial Officer           |
| Principal                Financial Officer and   |
| Executive                Vice President, Finance |
|                                             |
| August                14, 2008                   |

----
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Robert Knight, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Mexoro Minerals Limited; 

 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) omitted;  

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s  board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
#### § 144.5 Period of warehousing.

Merchandise must not remain in a bonded warehouse beyond 5 years from the date of importation or such longer period of time as the Center director may at his discretion permit upon proper request being filed and good cause shown.

[CBP Dec. 09-48, 74 FR 68686, Dec. 29, 2009, as amended by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93020, Dec. 20, 2016]
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 6781

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. RAYMOND EDWARD GILL , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. George L. Russell, III , District Judge. ( 1:81

- cr - 00105

- GLR

- 1 )

Submitted : November 17, 2022 Decided: November 23, 2022

Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Raymond Edward Gill, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Daniel Medinger, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6781 Doc: 9 Filed: 11/23/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Raymond Edward Gill filed a notice of appeal in the underlying criminal action after filing a self

- styled “Motion to Amend Original Writ of Error Coram Nobis” (“Motion to Amend”). The Government has filed a motion to dismiss, asserting , in part , that the district court has not yet ruled on the Motion to Amend

. T his court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral o rders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541,
545

- 46 (1949). Review of the district court docket confirms that the Motion to Amend remains pending in the district court

. Accordingly, we grant the Gov ernment’s motion and dismiss th is appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISS ED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6781 Doc: 9 Filed: 11/23/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           5,854
<SECURITIES>                                     3,282
<RECEIVABLES>                                       23
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,333
<PP&E>                                           3,095
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,284
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,043
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,624
<OTHER-SE>                                     (54,454)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,326
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (631)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,759)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,759)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.18)



</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 18, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 18, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18I0153. DALE ADAMS v. ASHLEY CLAXTON.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

16EV005072
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
United Rentals, Inc. (Form S-3 No.'s 333-41419-99, 333-70151, 333-70255,
333-64463 and 333-86197), the Registration Statement of United Rentals, Inc.
(Form S-8 No. 333-70345) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Option Plan, 1998 Stock
Option Plan, and 1998 Supplemental Stock Option Plan, and the Registration
Statement of United Rentals, Inc. (Form S-8 No. 333-74091) pertaining to the
options outstanding in connection with the 1997 Performance Award Plan of U.S.
Rentals assumed pursuant to the merger with U.S. Rentals, of our report dated
February 29, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
United Rentals, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1999, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

MetroPark, New Jersey
March 27, 2000
### §508. Assistance for certain youth and charitable organizations

(a) Authority To Provide Services.—Members and units of the National Guard may provide the services described in subsection (b) to an eligible organization in conjunction with training required under this chapter in any case in which—

(1) the provision of such services does not adversely affect the quality of that training or otherwise interfere with the ability of a member or unit of the National Guard to perform the military functions of the member or unit;

(2) the services to be provided are not commercially available, or any commercial entity that would otherwise provide such services has approved, in writing, the provision of such services by the National Guard;

(3) National Guard personnel will enhance their military skills as a result of providing such services; and

(4) the provision of the services will not result in a significant increase in the cost of the training.

(b) Authorized Services.—The services authorized to be provided under subsection (a) are as follows:

(1) Ground transportation.

(2) Air transportation in support of Special Olympics.

(3) Administrative support services.

(4) Technical training services.

(5) Emergency medical assistance and services.

(6) Communications services.

(c) Other Authorized Assistance.—Facilities and equipment of the National Guard, including military property of the United States issued to the National Guard and General Services Administration vehicles leased to the National Guard, and General Services Administration vehicles leased to the Department of Defense, may be used in connection with providing services to any eligible organization under this section.

(d) Eligible Organizations.—The organizations eligible to receive services under this section are as follows:

(1) The Boy Scouts of America.

(2) The Girl Scouts of America.

(3) The Boys Clubs of America.

(4) The Girls Clubs of America.

(5) The Young Men's Christian Association.

(6) The Young Women's Christian Association.

(7) The Civil Air Patrol.

(8) The United States Olympic Committee.

(9) The Special Olympics.

(10) The Campfire Boys.

(11) The Campfire Girls.

(12) The 4–H Club.

(13) The Police Athletic League.

(14) Any other youth or charitable organization designated by the Secretary of Defense.

(Added Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title III, §385(a), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2741.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

References to the United States Olympic Committee deemed to refer to the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee, see section 220502(c) of Title 36, Patriotic and National Observances, Ceremonies, and Organizations.
PUBLIC LAW 106–363—OCT. 27, 2000 114 STAT. 1407

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1715:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Sept. 18, considered and passed House.

Oct. 12, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–363

106th Congress

An Act

To extend and reauthorize the Defense Production Act of 1950.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TERMINATION DATE.

Section 717(a) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C.

App. 2166(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2000’’ and

inserting ‘‘September 30, 2001’’.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION.

Section 711(b) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C.

App. 2161(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘2000’’ and inserting ‘‘2001’’.

Approved October 27, 2000.

Oct. 27, 2000

[H.R. 1715]
### [§717. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title V, §589(b)(2), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3279]

Section, added Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title V, §520(b)(1), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1886, related to presentation of recognition items for retention purposes.
§ 185.130 Motions. ( a ) Any application to the ALJ for an order or ruling shall be by motion. Motions shall state the relief sought, the authority relied upon, and the facts alleged, and shall be filed with the ALJ and served on all other parties.
( b ) Except for motions made during a prehearing conference or at the hearing, all motions shall be in writing. The ALJ may require that oral motions be reduced to writing.
( c ) Within 15 days after a written motion is served, or such other time as may be fixed by the ALJ, any party may file a response to such motion.
( d ) The ALJ may not grant a written motion before the time for filing responses thereto has expired, except upon consent of the parties or following a hearing on the motion, but may overrule or deny such motion without awaiting a response.
( e ) The ALJ shall make a reasonable effort to dispose or all outstanding motions prior to the beginning of the hearing.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-04-0102 - Results of the Staff's Evaluation of Potential Doses to the Public from Material at the Kiski Valley Water Pollution Control Authority Site in Leechburg, Pennsylvania

Accession Number: ML041070359

Date Released: Thursday, August 19, 2004

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML041110312 - SECY-04-0102 - Results of the Staff's Evaluation of Potential Doses to the Public from Material at the Kiski Valley Pollution Control Authority Site in Leechburg, Pennsylvania (5 page(s), 6/22/2004)
    - ML041600337 - SECY-04-0102- Attachment:  Dose Assessment Related to Kiski Valley Water Pollution Control Authority Incinerator Ash Lagoon Attachment (40 page(s), 6/22/2004)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### § 146.0 Scope.

Foreign trade zones are established under the Foreign Trade Zones Act and the general regulations and rules of procedure of the Foreign Trade Zones Board contained in 15 CFR part 400. This part 146 of the Customs Regulations governs the admission of merchandise into a foreign trade zone, manipulation, manufacture, or exhibition in a zone; exportation of the merchandise from a zone; and transfer of merchandise from a zone into Customs territory.
#### § 303.2 Definitions.

In addition to the defined terms set forth in § 300.3 of this chapter, the following terms used in this part shall have the following meanings:

*Planning Investment* means the award of EDA Investment Assistance under section 203 of PWEDA and this part.

*Planning Organization* means a Recipient whose purpose is to develop and implement a CEDS for a specific EDA-approved Region under section 203 of PWEDA.

*Strategy Committee* means the committee or other entity identified by the Planning Organization as responsible for the development, implementation, revision or replacement of the CEDS for the Planning Organization.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23570]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, November 19, 2004.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-23570 Filed 10-18-04; 11:51 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-071 April 22, 2005

NRC PUBLISHES REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY

ON FIRE PROTECTION COMPENSATORY MEASURES

The NRC is informing nuclear power plant operators, through a Regulatory Issue Summary

(RIS), about the proper method for altering their fire protection program to use alternate compensatory

measures.

If a plant discovers degraded fire protection features, it can apply compensatory measures to

meet NRC regulations until the condition is fixed. Fire watches are a commonly used measure, but

many others (e.g., temporary fire barriers, operator briefings to raise awareness of and clarify actions to

be taken) can appropriately be used.

The RIS reminds plant operators that a documented evaluation of the condition will help

determine the most effective way to compensate for a given degraded feature. These evaluations must

show that the measures taken will continue to assure the reactor could shut down safely following a

fire. The evaluations should take into account factors such as the location, quantity and type of

combustible material near the degraded fire protection feature, possible ignition sources, and automatic

fire suppression and detection systems in the area.

The RIS is available on the agency’s web site, by entering accession number ML042360547 at

this address: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html . Questions should be directed to

Alex Klein (phone 301-415-4114 or ark1@nrc.gov ) or Phil Qualls (phone 301-415-1849 or

pmg@nrc.gov ).

###
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 File Nos. 333-87591; 333-95803; 333-90727; 333-67134 and
333-84596) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Plan, 1999 Directors' Stock Option Plan,
the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, NexPrise Inc. 1997 Stock Plan, NexPrise
Inc. Non-statutory Stock Option Agreement with Certain Employees, Infoprise Inc.
2000 Equity Incentive Plan and Infoprise Inc. 2000 Non Employee Equity Incentive
Plan of our report dated February 17, 2004 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of NexPrise Corporation included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

                                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
March 25, 2004
#### § 2634.801 Scope.

This subpart applies to ethics agreements made by any reporting individual under either subpart B or I of this part, to resolve potential or actual conflicts of interest.
§ 1655.2 Eligibility for loans. A participant can apply for a TSP general purpose or residential loan if: ( a ) More than 30 business days have elapsed since the participant has repaid in full any TSP loan;
( b ) The participant is in pay status;
( c ) The participant is eligible to contribute to the TSP; and
( d ) The participant has at least $1,000 in employee contributions and attributable earnings in his or her account. Paragraph (b) of this section shall not apply to loan requests made during a Government shutdown by participants who are furloughed or excepted from furlough due to the Government shutdown.
[87 FR 31692, May 24, 2022]