alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 4.66b Pollution of coastal and navigable waters. ( a ) If any Customs officer has reason to believe that any refuse matter is being or has been deposited in navigable waters or any tributary of any navigable waters in violation of section 13 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (30 Stat. 1152; 33 U.S.C. 407), or oil or a hazardous substance is being or has been discharged into or upon the navigable waters of the United States, adjoining shorelines, or into or upon the waters of the contiguous zone in violation of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251, 1321), he shall promptly furnish to the port director a full report of the incident, together with the names of witnesses and, when practicable, a sample of the material discharged from the vessel in question.
( b ) The port director shall forward this report immediately, without recommendation, to the district commander of the Coast Guard district concerned and a copy of such report shall be furnished to Headquarters, U.S. Customs Service.
[T.D. 73-18, 38 FR 1587, Jan. 16, 1973, as amended by T.D. 82-28, 47 FR 5226, Feb. 4, 1982]
NRC NEWS            U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                             Office of Public Affairs Region IV                            611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400                        Arlington, TX  76011-4005

No. IV-05-011 April 8, 2005Contact: Victor Dricks                                                                        E-Mail: opa4@nrc.govPhone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO DISCUSS 2004 PERFORMANCE AT COOPER NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Nebraska PublicPower District on April 13 to discuss the results of the agency’s assessment of safety performance at theCooper Nuclear Station during 2004.  The plant is located near Brownville, Neb.

The meeting will be held at 6 p.m. at the Brownville Concert Hall, located at Atlantic Avenue andSecond Street.  Before the session is adjourned, members of the NRC staff will be available to answerquestions from the public on the plant’s safety performance, as well as the agency’s role in ensuring safeoperation of the facility.

“Each year the NRC staff evaluates the performance of each of the nation’s commercial nuclearplants,” said Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallett.  “This meeting gives us a chance to discuss ourassessment with the district, local officials and residents near the plant.  We want to make this informationavailable to the public and answer any questions people may have about the plant.” 

Overall, Cooper operated safely during the period reviewed.  However, the NRC said Cooper willreceive additional regulatory oversight, beyond the baseline or “normal” level of inspection, during 2005due to a finding of low to moderate safety significance involving operator requalification writtenexamination failures.  The NRC will perform focused inspections under the baseline inspection programto address human performance and problem identification and resolution program deficiencies.

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office in Arlington, Tex., to plant officials will serve as thebasis for the meeting.  It is available from the NRC web site athttp://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/cns_2004q4.pdf 

Routine inspections are performed by the NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and byinspection specialists from the Region IV office and the agency’s headquarters in Rockville, Md.     

Current information for Cooper is available on the NRC web site at:http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CNS/cns_chart.html

###
§ 1810.2 Access to agency information in investigations. ( a ) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 1212(b)(5), OSC is authorized to have timely access to all agency records, data, reports, audits, reviews, documents, papers, recommendations, information, or other material that relate to an OSC investigation, review, or inquiry.
( b ) A claim of common law privilege, such as the attorney-client privilege, may not be used by any agency, or officer or employee of any agency, to withhold information from OSC. By providing such information to OSC, an agency will not be deemed to have waived the common law privilege against a non-Federal entity or against any individual in any other proceeding.
( c ) In the event of contumacy or failure of an agency to comply with any request under this section, the Special Counsel shall submit a report to the committees of Congress with jurisdiction over OSC and the applicable agency.
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jean
Paul Roy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for the periods presented.

















/s/ Jean
Paul Roy


------------------------








Jean Paul
Roy


President
and Chief Executive Officer


June 19,
2008
#### § 1207.102 Application.

This part applies to all programs or activities conducted by the agency, except for programs or activities conducted outside the United States that do not involve individuals with disabilities in the United States.
[Exhibit 10.7]


                       Consent of Director


November 1, 2002



Gentlemen:

I hereby consent to the use of my name in the registration of the
securities of Link Plus Corp. (Tax ID. # 52-1018174).

Sincerely,



/s/Donald F. Dunlap
111 Campbell Drive
Winter Haven, FL  33884
#### § 2422.33 Relief under part 2423 of this chapter.

Remedial relief that was or could have been obtained as a result of a motion, objection, or challenge filed or raised under this subpart, may not be the basis for similar relief under part 2423 of this chapter: But related matters may be consolidated for hearing as noted in § 2422.27(d) of this subpart.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V EN T H C IR C U IT AUGUST 11, 2005 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 05- 1177 8 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C. Docket N o. 03-01956 -CV -BE -S EMANUEL FORD, Pl ai nti ff -Appe llant,
ve rs us BIRMING HA M, C IT Y O F, De fendant-Appellee.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Appeal f rom the United State s District Court f o r th e N o rt h e rn D i s t r i c to f

A l ab a ma

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ (A ug us t 11, 200 5) Be fo re CA RN E S, MA RC U S an d C O X , Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M: Plaintiff Em anuel Ford app eals foll owing the district court’ s grant of summ ary j udgm en t f

or the Ci ty of Bi rm ing ha m on For d’ s cla im s for fa lse ar re st and e xc es siv e2

use of fo r c e u n d e r

4 2 U
. S
. C
. § 1 9 8 3
. W e c o n c l u d e th a tth e d i s t r i c tc o u rtp r o p e rl y granted the City ’ s m otion for sum m ary j udgm ent for th e reasons stated in the dis trict court’ s opin ions. (R. 2-32 and R.2-36.) Ford als o co n t en d s th at th e d i s t ri ct co u rt ab u s ed i t s d i s cr et i o n i n d en yin g Fo rd ’s
m otion to am end his com plaint. “ [I] t is not an abus e of discretion for a district court to d en y am oti on f

or le av e to am en d f

oll ow ing the c los e of

dis co ve ry , pa st the de ad li ne foram en dm en ts , and pa s t t h e de ad li ne forfil in g d is po si ti ve m ot io ns .” Ca rr ut he rs v. BSA Adv er tisi ng , Inc ., 357 F. 3d 1213, 1218 (1 1th Ci r. 2004 ) (quot ing Lo we ’s H

om e Ce nte rs, I

nc . v . O lin Co rp. , 313 F. 3d 13 07, 1315 (11t h Cir. 2002 ). G ive n th at

F or d’ s m oti on t o am en d the co m pla int w as fi le d m onths a ft er the de ad lin e for am ending the com

plaint had p assed, w e find no abuse of discretion in the district
co ur t’s d en ia l o f Fo rd ’s m ot io n t o a m en d h is co m pl ai nt . (R.2- 27 an d R .2-3 0.) AFFIRMED.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-03-029 April 8, 2003 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC ASSIGNS NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR TO CALVERT CLIFFS 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have selected Joseph M.

O’Hara II as a resident inspector at Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Station in Lusby, Md. O’Hara joins

Senior Resident Inspector Fred Bower at the two-unit site. He succeeds Leonard Cline, who was

promoted to Senior Resident Inspector at the James A. FitzPatrick nuclear plant in Scriba, N.Y.

O’Hara joined the NRC in 2002 as a region-based inspector in the Division of Reactor Safety. 

He also worked as a project engineer in the Region I Division of Reactor Projects. Prior to joining the

NRC, O’Hara worked at the Norfolk (Va.) Naval Shipyard. 

O’Hara has a Bachelor’s degree in marine engineering from the Massachusetts Maritime

Academy and a Master’s in engineering management from George Washington University.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They

serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring

significant work projects and interfacing with plant workers and the public.

O’Hara, his wife and children reside in California, Md., where he’s an assistant soccer coach in

the St. Mary’s Youth Soccer League. 

The Calvert Cliffs resident inspectors can be reached at 410/586-2626.

###
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

November 2016

Visit www.nrcs.usda.gov

or call 888-LANDCARE

to learn more about

the hope in healthy soil. 

Photo: Liang Zhang/Bigstock.com

Natural Resources

Conservation Service

Keep the soil covered as much as possible; 

Disturb the soil as little as possible;

Keep plants growing throughout the 

year to feed soil microbes; and

Grow a variety of plants to 

diversify soil biology.

Like nature, these principles ...

Make it healthier

with four key 

conservation practices

Love the soil

Make it healthier

with four key 

conservation practices

Love the

Natural

Resources

Conservation

Service

United States 

Department of 

Agriculture

Whether you farm hundreds of acres of cropland 

or tend a backyard garden, by following four basic 

soil health principles you can improve the health, 

function and productivity of your soil. Applied over 

time, these soil health principles enhance the soil’s 

ecosystem, allowing it to function naturally.
Unlock the secrets in the soil

with these ‘fabulous four’ conservation practices...

To put these principles to work, growers rely on four key soil-health-related practices.

Harvest 

the benefits

Crop Rotation

Cover Crops

Mulching 

No-Till 

Increase organic matter in the soil 

Increase microbiological activity 

Improve pollinator habitat

Improve nutrient cycling

Increase soil’s capacity to hold water 

Reduce plant stress and disease

Improve water quality

Reduce energy use

Growing a diverse number of crops in a planned sequence 

increases soil organic matter and biodiversity in the soil. This 

increased biodiversity helps reduce plant and disease pressure, too.

Cover crops are un-harvested crops grown as part of a planned 

rotation that provide benefits to the soil, principally by feeding soil 

microbes through their roots. Keeping living roots in the soil (before 

and after harvest) provides soil microbes with the habitat they need 

to thrive and provide nutrients and protection for harvested crops.

Applying or leaving plant residues or other suitable materials on 

the soil surface reduces evaporation, regulates soil temperature 

and helps protect the soil from erosion. 

No-till is a way to plant and grow crops without disturbing 

the soil through tillage (plowing, roto-tilling or hoeing). In the 

garden, small areas or rows can be cleared and small holes 

can be dug for transplants (or seeds), which minimizes soil 

disturbance and protects microbial communities that reside in 

the soil. On the farm, large-scale no-till planters use rotating 

coulters (disk-like blades) to slice through plant residues and 

cut small slits in the soil while seeds are placed in the narrow 

openings. This no-till technique limits soil disturbance and 

significantly reduces energy use.
#### § 191.131 Drawback allowance.

Section 313(g) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(g)), provides for drawback on imported materials used in the construction and equipment of vessels and aircraft built for foreign account and ownership, or for the government of any foreign country, notwithstanding that these vessels or aircraft may not be exported within the strict meaning of the term.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2


                                 CERTIFICATION
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Energy Homes, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 4, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
L. Stariha, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 /s/ James L. Stariha
James l. Stariha
Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2003





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Southern Energy Homes, Inc., and will be retained by Southern
Energy Homes, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request. This statement is submitted as accompanying this report
on Form 10-Q and is not filed as a part hereof, in accordance with Securities
and Exchange Commission Release 34-47551 (March 21, 2003).



                                      24
### §61g–8. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 61g–8 was editorially reclassified as section 6158 of this title.
#### Edwin Layden, Appellant, v. Knickerbocker Ice Company, Respondent.

Motion denied, with leave to apply to the Special Term. While the Appellate Division, as a condition of not dismissing an appeal, may limit the time to serve a ease or perfect an appeal, motions to extend the time to make and serve a case are properly made at Special Term. *(Odell*v. *McGrath,*16 App. Div. 103; *Matter of Stafford, 21*id. 476.) Present— Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-038 April 2, 2002

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY SUBMITS APPLICATION

FOR DESIGN CERTIFICATION OF ITS AP1000 NUCLEAR REACTOR

The Westinghouse Electric Company has submitted an application for design certification of its

AP1000 standard plant design.

The AP1000 design is for a nuclear power plant capable of producing about 1,100 megawatts of

electricity. The plant features enhanced safety systems that rely on gravity and pressure differentials to

safely shut down the reactor or mitigate the effects of an accident. It is designed for a 60-year operating

life.

With the certification, if granted, a utility that wished to build and operate a new nuclear power

plant could choose to use the design and reference it in a license application. Safety issues within the

scope of the certified design are not subject to litigation with respect to that individual license

application, although site-specific environmental impacts associated with building and operating the

plant at a particular location could be. NRC has certified three other standard reactor designs.

In submitting its application for design certification, Westinghouse referenced the AP600

standard design, which was certified by NRC in 1999. It made changes necessitated by the

requirements of the larger size of the AP1000. Additional details will be available in a notice to be

published shortly in the Federal Register.

NRC staff will perform an acceptance review to determine whether the application contains

sufficient information to be processed. If it is found acceptable, NRC will publish a notice in the

Federal Register announcing its acceptance and docketing of the application. The staff will review the

application, request any additional information necessary, then issue a draft Safety Evaluation Report to

address any safety questions. It could then issue a final Safety Evaluation Report if all technical and

safety questions have been resolved. This design can then be certified through NRC’s rulemaking

process, which includes an opportunity for public participation. The certification process is described in

Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 52, Subpart B. 

###
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CIV-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 

GROUP, INC. d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO UNSEAL

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff Security and Exchange 

Commission’s Motion to Unseal [ECF No. 47] (“Motion”), filed on July 30, 2020. The Motion 

seeks to unseal the filings, orders, and docket sheet in this case, with the exception of the law 

enforcement agency transcripts and declarations filed as exhibits to Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Temporary Restraining Order [ECF No. 14]. Having reviewed the Motion, and being otherwise 

fully advised, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED as follows:

The Court hereby directs the Clerk of Court to UNSEAL all documents, filings, orders, 

and the docket in this case, EXCEPT FOR Docket Entries: 31-14, 31-15, 32, 32-1, 32-2, 32-3, 

32-4, 33, 33-4, 33-5, 33-9, 33-10, 33-11, 34-1, 34-2, 34-3, 34-5, 41, 41-8, 41-26, 41-27, 41-29, 41-

30, 41-31 and 41-32, which SHALL REMAIN UNDER SEAL until further Order of the Court 

for the reasons set forth in Plaintiff’s Motion.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 30th day of July, 2020.

RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: Counsel of Record

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 54 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/31/2020 Page 1 of 1
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-5036 ATK THIOKOL, INC. (now known as ATK Launch Systems Inc.), Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 99-CV-440, Judge Susan C. Braden.

ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of the appellee's motion to revise the official caption, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted and the revised official caption is reflected above. FOR THE COURT

Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Thomas A. Lemmer, Esq. Robert E. Chandler, Esq. s8 FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT MAR 13 2009 JAh 10Zha CLERK 

## MAR ra 2009 Date /s/ Jan Horbalv
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from  the
registrant's  condensed  consolidated  financial  statements for the fiscal year
ended  July  3,  1999  and  is  qualified  in  its entirety by reference to such
financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUL-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                        9903
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                82875
<ALLOWANCES>                                   291
<INVENTORY>                                  45467
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            141216
<PP&E>                                      200723
<DEPRECIATION>                               85743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              260951
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        39603
<BONDS>                                     150000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     51792
<OTHER-SE>                                   (2031)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                260951
<SALES>                                     348955
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            348955
<CGS>                                       292914
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               292914
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                96
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           17415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              21971
<INCOME-TAX>                                  8590
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          13381
<DISCONTINUED>                                3802
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 17183
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0



</TABLE>
### §6105. Oversight responsibility of Director

The Director shall have oversight responsibility for the exercise of all authorities and responsibilities in this chapter not specifically assigned to the Director.

(Added Pub. L. 98–169, §5, Nov. 29, 1983, 97 Stat. 1115.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 6105, Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1002, related to authorization of appropriations to carry out this chapter, prior to repeal by section 5 of Pub. L. 98–169. See section 6106 of this title.
### §6615. Deposit of moneys for credit to account within Senate contingent fund for "Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate"

Any provision of law which is enacted prior to October 1, 1983, and which directs the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate to deposit any moneys in the United States Treasury for credit to the account, within the contingent fund of the Senate, for "Miscellaneous Items", or for "Automobiles and Maintenance" shall, on and after October 1, 1983, be deemed to direct him to deposit such moneys in the United States Treasury for credit to the account, within the contingent fund of the Senate, for the "Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate".

(Pub. L. 98–181, title I, §1202, Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1289.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 68–4 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1984.