alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1581 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1581

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from 
gross income for certain compensation received by members of the Armed 
                     Forces serving in South Korea.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2003

    Mr. Knollenberg (for himself, Mr. Hostettler, and Mr. Edwards) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from 
gross income for certain compensation received by members of the Armed 
                     Forces serving in South Korea.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States Forces Korea Quality 
of Life Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN COMPENSATION RECEIVED BY MEMBERS OF THE 
              ARMED FORCES SERVING IN SOUTH KOREA.

    (a) In General.--Section 112 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to certain combat zone compensation of members of the Armed 
Forces) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Compensation for Service in South Korea.--Gross income does 
not include so much of the compensation as does not exceed the maximum 
enlisted amount received for active service as a member of the Armed 
Forces of the United States for any month if such member served in 
South Korea for substantially all of such month.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendments.--
            (1) The heading for section 112 of such Code is amended to 
        read as follows:

``SEC. 112. CERTAIN COMPENSATION OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.''.

            (2) The item relating to section 112 in the table of 
        sections for part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code 
        is amended to read as follows:

                              ``Sec. 112. Certain compensation of 
                                        members of the Armed Forces.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
### §661. Purposes

The purposes of this subchapter are to—

(1) measure more accurately the costs of Federal credit programs;

(2) place the cost of credit programs on a budgetary basis equivalent to other Federal spending;

(3) encourage the delivery of benefits in the form most appropriate to the needs of beneficiaries; and

(4) improve the allocation of resources among credit programs and between credit and other spending programs.

(Pub. L. 93–344, title V, §501, as added Pub. L. 101–508, title XIII, §13201(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–610.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 661, Pub. L. 93–344, title VI, §606, July 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 325, directed that Budget Committees of House and Senate study, on a continuing basis, any provisions of law which exempt agencies or programs from inclusion in the budget and make recommendations from time to time with regard to terminating or modifying such provisions, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–177, title II, §§223, 275(a)(1), Dec. 12, 1985, 99 Stat. 1060, 1100, effective Dec. 12, 1985, and applicable with respect to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 1985.

A prior section 501 of Pub. L. 93–344, title V, July 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 321, was classified to section 1020 of former Title 31, prior to repeal and reenactment as section 1102 of Title 31, Money and Finance, by Pub. L. 97–258, §5(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1068, the first section of which enacted Title 31.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

For short title of title V of Pub. L. 93–344, which enacted this subchapter, as the "Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990", see section 500 of Pub. L. 93–344, set out as a note under section 621 of this title.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-04-040 July 7, 2004

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC DAVIS-BESSE OVERSIGHT PANEL TO MEET JULY 13 IN OHIO

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission Davis-Besse Oversight Panel will meet with FirstEnergy

Nuclear Operating Company officials on Tuesday, July 13, in Oak Harbor, Ohio, to review recent

operating performance and NRC inspection activities at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant.

The plant resumed operation in March after a two-year shutdown to replace the reactor vessel

head and make other safety system and staff performance improvements.

The meeting will be held at 6:30 p.m. in the Oak Harbor High School Auditorium, 11661 West

State Rt. 163, Oak Harbor. The public is invited to observe the business portion of the meeting and

will have an opportunity to make comments and ask questions of the NRC staff before the meeting is

adjourned. The staff will also be available after the meeting for informal discussions with the public.

“We expect to hear from utility officials how they assess their performance since the plant

resumed operation in March,” said John Grobe, Chairman of the NRC Oversight Panel. “In addition,

we will discuss the findings of recent NRC inspections at the plant.”

A transcript of the oversight panel meeting will be posted in several weeks on the NRC's web

site - http://www.nrc.gov. Select "Davis-Besse/Reactor Vessel Head Degradation" from the Key

Topics menu.

The NRC oversight panel includes NRC managers and staff from offices in Lisle, Illinois;

Rockville, Maryland; and the Davis-Besse site.

Documents on the Davis-Besse corrosion issue, including further details on NRC's oversight

panel activities, are posted on the NRC's web site.

###
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-05-020 April 15, 2005

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO DISCUSS 2004 PERFORMANCE AT WATTS BAR NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is scheduled to meet with Tennessee Valley

Authority officials April 18 to discuss the NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at the Watts

Bar nuclear power plant, located near Spring City, Tenn. The period covered is the calendar year 2004.

The 3:00 p.m. meeting at the Watts Bar Training Center near the plant is open to public

observation. Before the meeting ends, NRC staff will be available to answer public questions on the

plant’s safety performance, as well as the agency’s role in ensuring safe operation of the facility.

“Each year the NRC staff rates the performance of the Watts Bar plant and all of the nation’s

other commercial nuclear power plants,” NRC Region II Administrator William Travers said. “This

meeting gives us a chance to discuss our assessment with the company, with local officials and with

residents near the plant. Our aim is to make this information available to the public and answer any

questions people may have about our oversight.”

Overall, the Watts Bar plant operated safely during 2004. The NRC uses color-coded

inspection findings and performance indicators to assess performance. The colors start with “green”

and increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,” commensurate with the safety significance of the issues

involved. 

Based on the plant’s performance during 2004, Watts Bar will receive the baseline, or normal,

level of inspections during 2005. The NRC also plans to conduct non-routine inspections of the plant’s

preparations for steam generator replacement.

A letter sent from the NRC Region II Office to plant officials addresses the performance of the

plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the

NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/wb_2004q4.pdf .

Routine inspections are performed by NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by

specialists from the Region II Office in Atlanta, and the agency’s headquarters in Rockville, Md. 

Current information for the Watts Bar plant is available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/WB1/wb1_chart.html .

###
§ 1653.34 Processing Federal tax levies and criminal restitution orders. ( a ) The payment of tax levies and criminal restitution orders from the TSP is governed solely by the Federal Employees' Retirement Systems Act, 5 U.S.C. chapter 84, and by the terms of this subpart. Although the TSP record keeper will honor tax levies or criminal restitution orders properly issued, those entities have no jurisdiction over the TSP and the TSP cannot be made a party to the underlying proceedings.
( b ) The TSP record keeper will review a tax levy or criminal restitution order to determine whether it is enforceable against the TSP record keeper only after it has received a complete copy of the document. Receipt by an employing agency or any other agency of the Government does not constitute receipt by the TSP record keeper. Tax levies and criminal restitution orders should be submitted to the TSP record keeper at the current address as provided at *https://www.tsp.gov .* Receipt by the TSP record keeper is considered receipt by the TSP. To be complete, a tax levy or criminal restitution order must meet all the requirements of § 1653.32 or § 1653.33; it must also provide (or be accompanied by a document or enforcement letter that provides): ( 1 ) The participant's TSP account number or Social Security number (SSN); and
( 2 ) The name and mailing address of the payee.
( c ) As soon as practicable after the TSP record keeper receives a document that purports to be a qualifying tax levy or criminal restitution order, the participant's account will be frozen. After the participant's account is frozen, no TSP withdrawal or loan disbursements will be allowed until the account is unfrozen. All other account activity will be permitted, including contributions, loan repayments, adjustments, investment elections, fund reallocations, and fund transfers. Once a disbursement from the account is made in accordance with the restitution order or levy, the hold will be removed from the participant's account.
( d ) As soon as practicable after receipt of a complete copy of a tax levy or criminal restitution order, the TSP record keeper will review it to determine whether it is qualifying as described in § 1653.32 or § 1653.33. The TSP record keeper will mail a decision letter to all parties containing the following information: ( 1 ) A determination regarding whether the restitution order or levy is qualifying;
( 2 ) A statement of the applicable statutes and regulations;
( 3 ) An explanation of the effect the restitution order or levy has on the participant's TSP account; and
( 4 ) If the qualifying restitution order or levy requires payment, the letter will provide: ( i ) An explanation of how the payment will be calculated and an estimated amount of payment;
( ii ) The anticipated date of payment.
[87 FR 31691, May 24, 2022]
### §144. Repealed. Pub. L. 88–131, §3, Sept. 4, 1963, 77 Stat. 194

Section, act Oct. 11, 1951, ch. 495, §6, Pt. A, 65 Stat. 408, related to applicability of sections 144 to 147d of this title, provided that rules concerning lights be complied with from sunset to sunrise, and defined terms used in sections 145 to 147d of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Sept. 1, 1965, see Proc. No. 3632, Dec. 29, 1964, 29 F.R. 19167, and section 3 of Pub. L. 88–131, both set out as notes under section 1051 of this title.
#### McArthur *vs.*The Montclair Railway Company.

Compensation of receivers of an insolvent railroad company.

The Chancellor.

The master has reported that two of the trustees should receive for their compensation $3000 each, and the other about $1400. The report is accompanied by depositions as to the services rendered and the value thereof. The trustees were appointed in July, 1873. The usual practice of appointing but a single receiver was departed from in this case at the instance of the representatives of the different interests in the trust property. The gentlemen selected were chosen for their fitness for the discharge of the various duties which were to be devolved upon them in the management of the railroad, and the examination of the affairs of the company. They were all men of experience in business, one'in the management of trusts, another in the superintendence of railroads, and the third in financial affairs. They appear to have necessarily •devoted much time during a period of two years to the interests of the trust, (which involved the sale of the road,) and to have been very diligent and thorough in their attention to, •and discharge of their duties.

The amount reported by the master seems not to be unreasonable. The report will therefore be confirmed.
### §1260. Applications; allocation

(1) A grant or contract authorized by section 1259 of this title may be made only upon application to the Administrator at such time or times and containing such information as he may prescribe, except that no such application shall be approved unless it—

(A) sets forth programs, activities, research, or development for which a grant is authorized under section 1259 of this title and describes the relation to any program set forth by the applicant in an application, if any, submitted pursuant to section 1261 of this title;

(B) provides such fiscal control and fund accounting procedures as may be necessary to assure proper disbursement of and accounting for Federal funds paid to the applicant under this section; and

(C) provides for making such reports, in such form and containing such information, as the Administrator may require to carry out his functions under this section, and for keeping such records and for affording such access thereto as the Administrator may find necessary to assure the correctness and verification of such reports.

(2) The Administrator shall allocate grants or contracts under section 1259 of this title in such manner as will most nearly provide an equitable distribution of the grants or contracts throughout the United States among institutions of higher education which show promise of being able to use funds effectively for the purpose of this section.

(3)(A) Payments under this section may be used in accordance with regulations of the Administrator, and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in an application approved under paragraph (1), to pay part of the compensation of students employed in connection with the operation and maintenance of treatment works, other than as an employee in connection with the operation and maintenance of treatment works or as an employee in any branch of the Government of the United States, as part of a program for which a grant has been approved pursuant to this section.

(B) Departments and agencies of the United States are encouraged, to the extent consistent with efficient administration, to enter into arrangements with institutions of higher education for the full-time, part-time, or temporary employment, whether in the competitive or excepted service, of students enrolled in programs set forth in applications approved under paragraph (1).

(June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title I, §110, as added Pub. L. 92–500, §2, Oct. 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 830.)
### §361. Publication of recommendations

The recommendations of the President which take effect shall be printed in the Statutes at Large in the same volume as public laws and shall be printed in the Federal Register and included in the Code of Federal Regulations.

(Pub. L. 90–206, title II, §225(k), Dec. 16, 1967, 81 Stat. 644.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 16, 1967, see section 220(a)(1) of Pub. L. 90–206, set out as a note under section 3110 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6777

MICHAEL BAXTER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-97-

3564-L)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 10, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Baxter, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney General, Ann

Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Baxter v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-3564-L (D. Md.

May 15, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §3530. Adjusting accounts

(a) An appropriation or fund currently available for the expense of an accountable function shall be charged with an amount necessary to adjust an account of an accountable official or agent when—

(1) necessary to adjust the account for a loss to the United States Government resulting from the fault or negligence of the official or agent; and

(2) the head of the agency decides the loss is uncollectable.

(b) An adjustment does not affect the personal financial liability of an official or agent for the loss.

(c) The Comptroller General shall prescribe regulations to carry out subsection (a) of this section.

(d) Under procedures prescribed by the Comptroller General, the head of an agency may charge the net amount of unpaid and overpaid balances in individual pay accounts against the appropriation for the fiscal year in which the balances occurred and from which the accounts were payable. The net amount shall be credited to and paid from the corresponding appropriation for the next fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 967.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3530(a) | 31:1202(a)(1st sentence). | June 6, 1972, Pub. L. 92–310, §102, 86 Stat. 201. |
| 3530(b) | 31:1202(a)(last sentence). | |
| 3530(c) | 31:1202(b). | |
| 3530(d) | 31:581d. | July 15, 1954, ch. 509, §3(a), 68 Stat. 483. |

In subsection (a), before clause (1), the words "restore or otherwise" are omitted as surplus. The word "currently" is substituted for "at the time the restoration or adjustment is made" to eliminate unnecessary words. The word "official" is substituted for "officer" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. In clause (2), the words "concerned" and "the amount of" are omitted as surplus.

In subsection (b), the words "restoration or" are omitted as surplus and because of the restatement.

In subsections (c) and (d), the words "of the United States" are omitted as surplus.

In subsection (c), the words "and issue" are omitted as surplus. The words "to carry out subsection (a) of this section" are substituted for "The restorations and adjustments provided for by subsection (a) of this section shall be made in accordance with" to eliminate unnecessary words.

In subsection (d), the word "settlement" is omitted as surplus. The words "the Secretary of the department concerned or . . . or independent establishment concerned" are omitted as unnecessary because of the restatement. The word "occurring" is omitted as surplus. The word "accounts" is substituted for "amount" before "was payable" for clarity. The word "succeeding" is omitted as surplus.
### §106. Annual appropriations

Sums will be appropriated annually, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the support of the Army National Guard and the Air National Guard, including the issue of arms, ordnance stores, quartermaster stores, camp equipage, and other military supplies, and for the payment of other expenses authorized by law.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 599.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 106 | 32:21. | June 3, 1916, ch. 134, §67 (1st par.), 39 Stat. 199. |

The words "issue of" are substituted for the words "the expense of providing". The words "for issue to the National Guard" and "pertaining to said guard as are or may be" are omitted as surplusage.
#### § 1203.15 Review of regulations on the Board's own motion.

The Board may, from time to time, review a regulation on its own motion under 5 U.S.C. 1204(f)(1)(A). When it does so, it will publish notice of the review in the Federal Register.

[54 FR 28658, July 6, 1989]