alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 12,980.

#### Higbee *v.*John et al.

(21 P. [2d] 1118)

Decided May 8, 1933.

Mr. Haeey Gr. Saundees, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Lindsey & Laewill, Mr. D. K. Wolee, Je., for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed in department without written opinion, Mr. Chief Justice Adams, Mr. Justice Butler and Mr. Justice Moore participating.
§ 178.205 Procedures upon death of employee. ( a ) *Claim form.* As soon as practicable after the death of an employee, the agency in which the employee was last employed will request, in the order of precedence outlined in § 178.204, the appropriate person or persons to execute Standard Form 1153, Claim for Unpaid Compensation of Deceased Civilian Employee.
( b ) *Claims involving minors or incompetents.* If a guardian or committee has been appointed for a minor or incompetent appearing entitled to unpaid compensation, the claim should be supported by a certificate of the court showing the appointment and qualification of the claimant in such capacity. If no guardian or committee has been or will be appointed, the initial claim should be supported by a statement showing: ( 1 ) Claimant's relationship to the minor or incompetent, if any;
( 2 ) The name and address of the person having care and custody of the minor or incompetent;
( 3 ) That any moneys received will be applied to the use and benefit of the minor or incompetent; and
( 4 ) That the appointment of a guardian or committee is not contemplated.
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-04-057 December 9, 2004

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH TVA TO DISCUSS BROWNS FERRY

NUCLEAR PLANT LICENSE RENEWAL INSPECTION

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials have scheduled a meeting with Tennessee Valley

Authority management at 10:00 a.m. (CST) on Friday, Dec. 17, at the plant site in Athens, Ala., to

discuss the results of the agency’s inspection of the Browns Ferry nuclear plant’s license renewal

program. 

The meeting will be held in Room 201 of the Browns Ferry Nuclear Site Training Center

Auditorium, located at Shaw Road and Nuclear Plant Road in Athens. It will be open to public

observation, and NRC officials will be available prior to the close of the meeting to answer questions

from interested observers. A report on the inspection will be issued approximately 45 days after the

meeting and will be available to the public.

The inspection, which began Nov. 29th and runs until Dec. 17th, is conducted to verify that

programs are in place to manage the material condition of the plant’s systems, structures and

components during the 20 additional years of operation should the NRC approve the license renewal

application. 

TVA submitted an application to renew the licenses for the three units at the Browns Ferry

plant license in January of this year, and that application, if approved by the NRC, would extend the

expiration date of the operating license for Unit 1 from 2013 to 2033, for Unit 2 from 2014 to 2034 and

for Unit 3 from 2016 to 2036. 

###
#### § 163.3 Entry records.

Any person described in § 163.2(a) with reference to an import transaction shall be prepared to produce or transmit to Customs, in accordance with § 163.6(a), any entry records which may be demanded by Customs. If entry records submitted to Customs not pursuant to a demand are returned by Customs, or if production of entry records at the time of entry is waived by Customs, such person shall continue to maintain those entry records in accordance with this part. Entry records which are normally kept in the ordinary course of business must be maintained by such person in accordance with this part whether or not copies thereof are retained by Customs.
### [§5328. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–283, div. F, title LXIII, §6314(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4603]

Section, added Pub. L. 102–550, title XV, §1563(a), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4072; amended Pub. L. 107–56, title III, §365(c)(2)(B)(i), Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 335, related to whistleblower protections. See section 5323 of this title.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Tami Donald, Jerry Moore, and Summit 

Spring Water Company, Inc., Appellants

No. 06-15-00052-CV v.

Brian Rhone, BMR Distributing, Inc., Chris 

Rhone, and Rhone Water Company, Inc. 

d/b/a Frosty’s Water, Appellees

Appeal from the 336th District Court of 

Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 38803). 

Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief 

Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of the 

court below. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause for further 

proceedings.

We further order that the appellees, Brian Rhone, BMR Distributing, Inc., Chris Rhone, 

and Rhone Water Company, Inc. d/b/a Frosty’s Water, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED APRIL 14, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
### §142. Repealed. Oct. 11, 1951, ch. 495, §5, 65 Stat. 407

Section, act Aug. 19, 1890, ch. 802, §1, as added Aug. 21, 1935, ch. 595, §1, 49 Stat. 668, related to orders to helmsmen.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 1954, see note set out under sections 61 to 63 of this title.
#### Dolores N. Porges, Respondent, v. Guy P. Louis-Dreyfus, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
EXHIBIT
      32.1













CERTIFICATION
      OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the Company)
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2006 and this Form 10-QSB/A
      (the Report), I, Jean Paul Roy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
      of the *Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002* ,
      that:





1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the*Securities
                Exchange Act of 1934*;
                and





2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.

















/s/
      Jean Paul Roy


Jean
      Paul
      Roy


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


May
      15,
      2007
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period
ended June 30, 2002 of Synagro Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ross M. Patten, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company and that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


                                                         /s/ ROSS M. PATTEN
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Ross M. Patten
                                                        August 16, 2002
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-04-026 April 23, 2004

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC ISSUES LETTER ON PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLANS

FOR POINT BEACH NUCLEAR POWER STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued a letter to Nuclear Management

Company, confirming the company’s plans to improve performance at the Point Beach Nuclear Power

Station. The facility, which has two reactor units, is located near Two Rivers, Wisconsin.

The letter, called a Confirmatory Action Letter, documents Nuclear Management’s plans and

discusses how the NRC will monitor the improvement activities.

The plant is under heightened NRC oversight because of safety problems which occurred at the

plant in 2001 and 2002. These problems, which would have affected the operation of a plant safety

system, the auxiliary feedwater system, under certain accident conditions, were determined to be of

"high safety significance" by the agency. The specific equipment problems have been corrected.

The auxiliary feedwater system is used to safely cool the reactor if problems occur during plant

operations and to continue removing heat from the reactor after shutdown.

In February the company submitted its plans to improve performance at the plant and

supplemented those plans on March 22. These plans address improvement activities for human

performance, engineering design control, communications between the engineering and operating

staffs, emergency preparedness, and the corrective action program -- how the company finds,

evaluates, and fixes problems.

To monitor the progress and effectiveness of Nuclear Management’s improvement programs,

the NRC will conduct periodic inspections in addition to normal oversight activities and hold public

meetings with the company approximately every six weeks. These inspections will cover engineering

design activities, review the corrective action program, and evaluate the progress of the company’s

improvement initiatives.

The Confirmatory Action Letter will be available in the NRC's online document system at

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html [use accession number ML041130468] and from the

Region III Office of Public Affairs.

# # #
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

187 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of United Rentals, Inc. and United Rentals (North America),
Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Martin E. Welch, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    MARTIN E. WELCH III Martin E. Welch III Chief Financial Officer


February 28, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Companies and will be retained by the Companies and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 11
 AmSurg Corp.
Earnings Per Share
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006
  Three Months Ended September 30,
    
    Nine Months Ended September 30,Per
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    PerEarnings
    
    Shares
    
    Share
    
    Earnings
    
    Shares
    
    Share(Numerator)
    
    (Denominator)
    
    Amount
    
    (Numerator)
    
    (Denominator)
    
    Amount2007:Net earnings from
continuing
operations
per common share
(basic)
    
    $
    10,899
    
    
    
    30,778
    
    
    $
    0.35
    
    
    $
    32,090
    
    
    
    30,455
    
    
    $
    1.05Effect of dilutive
securities options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    397
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    467Net earnings from
continuing
operations per
common share
(diluted)
    
    $
    10,899
    
    
    
    31,175
    
    
    $
    0.35
    
    
    $
    32,090
    
    
    
    30,922
    
    
    $
    1.04Net earnings per
common share
(basic)
    
    $
    9,990
    
    
    
    30,778
    
    
    $
    0.32
    
    
    $
    31,459
    
    
    
    30,455
    
    
    $
    1.03Effect of dilutive
securities options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    397
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    467Net earnings per
common share
(diluted)
    
    $
    9,990
    
    
    
    31,175
    
    
    $
    0.32
    
    
    $
    31,549
    
    
    
    30,922
    
    
    $
    1.022006:Net earnings from
continuing
operations
per common share
(basic)
    
    $
    9,384
    
    
    
    29,875
    
    
    $
    0.31
    
    
    $
    27,972
    
    
    
    29,787
    
    
    $
    0.94Effect of dilutive
securities options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    548
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    584Net earnings from
continuing
operations per
common share
(diluted)
    
    $
    9,384
    
    
    
    30,423
    
    
    $
    0.31
    
    
    $
    27,972
    
    
    
    30,371
    
    
    $
    0.92Net earnings per
common share
(basic)
    
    $
    9,362
    
    
    
    29,875
    
    
    $
    0.31
    
    
    $
    28,191
    
    
    
    29,787
    
    
    $
    0.95Effect of dilutive
securities options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    548
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    584Net earnings per
common share
(diluted)
    
    $
    9,362
    
    
    
    30,423
    
    
    $
    0.31
    
    
    $
    28,191
    
    
    
    30,371
    
    
    $
    0.93
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Lathrop Brown, Respondent, v. Gustave A. Brunger and Others, as Members of and Together Constituting the Board of Inspectors of Elections of Election District No. 22, Town of Hempstead, Nassau County, and Others, etc., Respondents. Frederick C. Hicks, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 3.)

The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Order modified in accordance with opinion in *People ex rel. Brown*v. *Freisch, No. 1 (ante,*p. 370), decided herewith, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before the presiding justice.
#### § 1810.4 Investigative policy regarding agency liaisons.

Agency liaisons facilitate their agency's cooperation with OSC's investigations by ensuring that agencies timely and accurately respond to OSC's requests for information and witness testimony, as well as by assisting with the resolution of complaints. To maintain the integrity of OSC's investigations and to avoid actual or perceived conflicts, agency liaisons should not have current or past involvement in the personnel actions at issue in the assigned case.
#### Louis Hilbrandt, Plaintiff, and Dorothea Hilbrandt, Respondent, v. George E. Mole & Sons, Inc., et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) George E. Mole & Sons, Inc., Appellant, v. Louis Hilbrandt, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

Consolidated actions to recover damages for injuries to person and property. The jury rendered a verdict, in Action Ho. 1, for $30,000 in favor of plaintiff Dorothea Hilbrandt and against the defendants, and in favor of said defendants against plaintiff Louis Hilbrandt. In'Action Ho. 2, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendant, Louis Hilbrandt. Defendants in Action Ho. 1 appeal from the judgment entered thereon insofar as it is in favor of plaintiff Dorothea Hilbrandt. Plaintiff in Action Ho. 2 appeals from said judgment insofar as it is in favor of the defendant in that action. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. Ho opinion. Present — Holán, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ.
#### Alfred C. Blumenthal v. Margaret F. Blumenthal.

Present — Townley, Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0558

RYAN PATRICK SULLIVAN,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s late-filed motion for a 45-day extension of 

time, and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including April 18, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief.

TKP

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 24 2021

03/24/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0558
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-70203, 333-73053 and 333-45276) and in the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-82126) of King Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. of our report dated February 27, 2006 relating to the financial statements,
financial statement schedules, management's assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Raleigh, NC
March 3, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 2, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 63458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24437]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 04-3231; MB Docket No. 04-72; RM-10857]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Bethel and Windsor, NC

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In response to petition for rule making filed by Eure 
Communications, Inc. and Lifeline Ministries, Inc. this document 
substitutes Channel 255C3 for Channel 255A at Windsor, North Carolina, 
reallots Channel 255C3 from Windsor to Bethel, North Carolina, and 
modifies the Station WIAM license to specify operation on Channel 255C3 
at Bethel. See 69 FR 17125, April 1, 2004. The reference coordinates 
for the Channel 255C3 allotment at Bethel, North Carolina, are 35-48-25 
and 77-22-44. With this action, the proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective November 29, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Hayne, Media Bureau, (202) 418-
2177.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Report and Order 
in MB Docket No.04-72 adopted October 13, 2004, and released October 
15, 2004. The full text of this decision is available for inspection 
and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference 
Information Center at Portals ll, CY-A257, 445 12th Street, SW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and 
Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 
20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or http://www.BCPIWEB.com. The 
Commission will send a copy of this Report and Order in a report to be 
sent to Congress and the General Accounting Office pursuant to the 
Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio, Radio broadcasting.

0
Part 73 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

0
1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec.  73.202  [Amended]

0
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under North Carolina, 
is amended by removing Channel 255A at Windsor and by adding Bethel, 
Channel 255C3.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
 Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 04-24437 Filed 11-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-094 June 7, 2000

NRC CONSIDERING REQUEST BY OKLAHOMA

TO BE AN “AGREEMENT STATE”

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is considering a request by the state of Oklahoma to

assume regulatory authority over certain nuclear materials. If the request is accepted, Oklahoma will

become the 32nd state to sign such an agreement with NRC.

Under the agreement, NRC will transfer to Oklahoma the responsibility for licensing,

rulemaking, inspection and enforcement concerning (1) materials made radioactive in nuclear research

reactors; (2) uranium and thorium source materials used as shielding in certain medical and industrial

instruments; and (3) special nuclear material in quantities not sufficient to support a nuclear reaction.

The agreement would also allow the state to regulate the land disposal of radioactive waste.

If the agreement is approved, approximately 220 current NRC licenses, most of them for

medical and industrial uses, would be transferred to Oklahoma’s jurisdiction. The Oklahoma

Department of Environmental Quality will administer the regulatory program.

The NRC will retain jurisdiction over 14 nuclear materials licenses and over regulation of

nuclear reactors and other major nuclear facilities in Oklahoma. It will also continue to regulate

Federal agencies that use certain nuclear materials in the state.

The NRC has preliminarily determined that the state’s radiation control program is adequate to

protect public health and safety and is compatible with the agency’s own program for regulating the

radioactive materials covered in the agreement.

It should be noted that NRC staff and representatives of Oklahoma have worked closely to

identify efficiencies in the Agreement review process to meet the Governor’s request for an effective

date of September 30. The NRC expects to meet that deadline which is two months ahead of schedule,

and apply the same expedited review process for future state agreement requests. An announcement of

the proposed agreement, along with a summary of the NRC staff draft assessment of the proposed

Oklahoma Program, will be published for public comment once a week for four consecutive weeks in

the Federal Register.
Other states that have previously signed such agreements with NRC, are: Alabama, Arizona,

Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana,

Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York,

North Carolina, North Dakota, Maine, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas,

Utah, and Washington. Three other states are in various stages of entering into agreements with the

NRC. They are Pennsylvania, Minnesota and Wisconsin.

###