alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ruth M. Botway, Respondent, *v.*Richard Botway, Appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

The order of reference insofar as it relates to temporary alimony and provides for the payment of $50 a week pending the report of the official referee is improper. The parties had entered into a separation agreement before this action for a judicial separation was instituted by the wife. The husband is continuing to pay the amount provided for in the separation agreement for the support and maintenance of his wife and child; he was not in default when the order appealed from was made. The validity of the separation agreement when entered into and any questions of breach, waiver or default should not be determined on conflicting affidavits but should await the trial. The reference may proceed to enable the court to pass on the application for counsel fees, if the parties so desire. The order of reference is modified by striking therefrom the provisions for payment of alimony *(Johnson*v. *Johnson,*206 N. Y. 561; *Henning*v. *Henning,*272 App. Div. 676; *Butler*v. *Butler,*206 App. Div. 214; *Ascher*v. *Ascher,*213 App. Div. 183; *Rosenblatt*v. *Rosenblatt,*209 App. Div. 373). As so modified the order appealed from is affirmed, without costs.

Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Order of reference unanimously modified by striking therefrom the provisions for payment of alimony and by limiting the scope of the reference to the *949question of counsel fees and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.
### **CHAPTER 5—NAVIGATION RULES FOR RED RIVER OF THE NORTH AND RIVERS EMPTYING INTO GULF OF MEXICO AND TRIBUTARIES**

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The rules for preventing collisions prescribed by R.S. §4233, as amended, formed the basis of this chapter. Those rules as enacted were not limited in application to the navigation of any waters. But they were superseded as to navigation on the high seas and in all coast waters of the United States, except such as were otherwise provided for, by the adoption of "Revised International Regulations" by act Mar. 3, 1885, ch. 354, 23 Stat. 438; and these regulations were superseded by the adoption of the subsequent regulations of act Aug. 19, 1890, set out as section 61 et seq. and section 1051 et seq. of this title. The rules prescribed by R.S. §4233 were further superseded, as to navigation on the Great Lakes and their connecting and tributary waters as far east as Montreal, by the rules applying to such navigation prescribed by act Feb. 8, 1895 (section 241 et seq. of this title). The provisions of R.S. §§4233, 4412, and 4413 and regulations pursuant thereto were adopted as special rules for the navigation of harbors, rivers, and inland waters of the United States (except the Great Lakes and their connecting and tributary waters as far east as Montreal) by act Feb. 19, 1895. R.S. §§4412 and 4413 were classified to section 381 of former Title 46, Shipping. But thereafter the rules prescribed by R.S. §4233, were further superseded as to navigation of all harbors, rivers, and inland waters except the Red River of the North and rivers emptying into the Gulf of Mexico and their tributaries, by the rules applying to all such waters other than the specific exceptions, of act June 7, 1897 (section 151 et seq. of this title). The rules prescribed by R.S. §4233, therefore, remained in force only as to the navigation of the Red River of the North and rivers emptying into the Gulf of Mexico and their tributaries.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Charles I.
Leone, certify that:

1.  I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of U.S. Wireless Data, Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The
registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors:

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March
14, 2005

/s/ Charles
I. Leone
Charles I. Leone
Executive Vice President and
        Chief Administrative Officer
        (Acting Chief Financial Officer
        and Principal Financial Officer)

---
FIRST ADDENDUM
                                       TO
                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


     WHEREAS,  the  undersigned,  MATTHEW P. DWYER (the "Maker"), has executed a
promissory  note  dated  November  22,  2002 in the original principal amount of
$150,000.00  (the  "Note")  in  favor  of  MARC  DOUGLAS,  (the  "Holder");

     WHEREAS,  the  Maturity  Date  under  Note  was  February  24,  2003;

     WHEREAS,  Maker  and  Holder  mutually  desire  by  this  First Addendum to
Promissory  Note  to  change  the  Maturity  Date  to  January  24,  2002.

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  for  good  and adequate consideration, the sufficiency of
which  is  hereby  acknowledged,  the  parties  agree  as  follows:

     1.  The  Maturity  Date  as  defined in the Note shall be January 24, 2002.

     All  other  terms  and conditions of the Note shall remain unchanged and in
full  force  and  effect.

Executed  this  16th  day  of  December,  2002.

HOLDER:                              MAKER:

/s/ Marc Douglas                     /s/ Matthew P. Dwyer
----------------------               --------------------------
Marc  Douglas                        Matthew  P.  Dwyer
### INVITATION: HEAVY

- DUTY MVAC

STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP

Hosted By: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Air and

Radiation, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Stratospheric Protection Division

Date: November 18, 2015

Time: 1:30

– 3:00 p.m. (please plan to arrive by 1:15 p.m. to sign in)

Location: EPA, 1201 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20004, Room 4225

Background: EPA hosted a meeting on September 11, 2015, for interested stakeholders

to exchange information on recent and future actions under the Significant New

Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program. During the past 12 months, EPA has taken four

separate actions under the SNAP program, to support the President’s June 2013 Climate

Action Plan, which directs EPA to “use its authority through the Significant New

Alternatives Policy Program to encourage private sector investment in low

- emissions

technology by identifying and approving climate

- friendly chemicals while prohibiting

certain uses of the most harmful chemical alternatives.” As part of SNAP’s continuing

efforts, we are hosting this workshop which will concentrate on motor vehicle air

conditioning (MVAC) systems for heavy

- duty vehicles within the refrigeration and air

conditioning sector.

Logistics: Please RSVP by November 13 th to Paul

- Harvey Weiner with a direct reply to

this e

- mail ( weiner.paul

- harvey@epa.gov ) or by telephone at (202) 343

- 9740. Please

include your name and affiliation. You are welcome to share this invitation with other

interested participants; however, please ask them to RSVP by November 13 th as well. We

look forward to a productive and informative meeting.

PAGE 1 OF 1 www.epa.gov/ozone/snap
#### § 1312.36 Appeal procedure.

Appeals received as a result of a denial, see § 1312.34, will be routed to the Deputy Director who will take action as necessary to determine whether any part of the information may be declassified. If so, he will notify the requester of his determination and make that information available that is declassified and otherwise releasable. If continued classification is required, the requestor shall be notified by the Deputy Director of the reasons thereafter. Determinations on appeals will normally be made within 60 working days following receipt. If additional time is needed, the requestor will be notified and this reason given for the extension. The agency's decision can be appealed to the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel.
#### § 4.13 [Reserved]
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-03-035 July 10, 2003

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

BRADY NAMED NRC SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT McGUIRE NUCLEAR PLANT

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in the Region II office in Atlanta have announced

the assignment of Joseph B. (Joe) Brady as the new Senior Resident Inspector at the McGuire Nuclear

Plant near Huntersville, North Carolina.

Brady is a 1972 graduate of Purdue University with a degree in mechanical engineering. He spent

five years in the US Navy as a nuclear submarine officer. Before joining the NRC, he also worked for

Chevron USA as an engineer and supervisor at the Pascagoula, Mississippi, refinery, and for Brunswick

Corporation as a research and product development engineer. Brady joined the NRC in 1986 and has

worked as an inspector in the Office of Special Projects, the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, and

in the Region II office. His most recent assignment was as the Senior Resident Inspector at the Shearon

Harris Nuclear Power Plant near Raleigh, NC.

Brady joins NRC Resident Inspector Gene DiPaolo and Site Secretary Debra Snyder at the

McGuire plant. The NRC inspectors at McGuire can be reached at 704-875-1681.

###
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03-06-00005- CV

Walkab out Air, Inc.; Southaire, Inc.; and Ed ward A. B runner, Appellan ts
v. Blak e Byram d/b /a Byram Aviation, App ellee

FR OM T HE C OU N T Y C OU R T A T L A W N O. 1 OF T R A V IS C OU N T Y, NO. 27969 4, HO NORAB LE ORLINDA NARANJO , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N The pa rt ie s h av e f

il e d a jo int mo ti o n to d is mi s s th e a p p e a l a dv is in g th a t th e y

have settled their dispute. We dismiss t he appe al on the joint motion.

Be a Ann Smith, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces B . A. Smith and Pury ear Dismissed on J oint Moti on Filed: F ebrua

ry 28, 2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**DAVID ISAIAH JETT,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 576 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 31st day of December, 2015, the Petition for Al lowance of** 

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**

**Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of t his matter.**
#### Gerald D. MICHAUD, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent.

No. 02-3137.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 16, 2002.

ORDER

Petitioner having paid the required filing fee, and having filed the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED.

Respondent should compute the due date for filing its brief from the date of filing of this order.
### SUBCHAPTER I—RESEARCH AND RELATED PROGRAMS
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Andrew G. Sculley, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of eMagin Corporation.

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this report;

 

 
| Dated: April 30,   2019 |   | By:    | /s/ Andrew G. Sculley           |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                              |   |   | Andrew G. Sculley               |
|                              |   |   | Chief Executive Officer         |
|                              |   |   | (Principal Executive   Officer) |

 

----
### §72c. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §204(13), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1732

Section, act July 17, 1947, ch. 262, 61 Stat. 367, related to House committee reports on employed personnel.
Brigham Living 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 7, 2014

No. 04-14-00163-CV

AAA FREE MOVE MINISTORAGE L.L.C.,

Appellant

v.

BRIGHAM LIVING TRUST,

Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-01363

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Agreed Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellee’s Brief is 

GRANTED. The appellee’s brief is due on October 10, 2014.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of October, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
----

Action brought on 20 October 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Italian Republic

(Case C-382/05)

(2006/C 22/07)

Language of the case: Italian

An action against the Italian Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 20 October 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by A. Aresu and X. Lewis, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

According to the Commission, an examination of the documents relating to the award of the contracts at issue leads to the conclusion that they are to be classified as public service contracts governed by Directive 92/50/EEC.

It follows that those contracts should have been awarded in compliance with the rules on advertising and participation laid down in Titles III and IV of that directive and, in particular, following publication in the O.J.E.U of the contract notice required by Articles 15 and 17 of the directive and in accordance with the procedures set out in Article 11.

In the present case, the notice published on behalf of the Commissario delegato cannot be regarded as adequately fulfilling the advertising requirements laid down by the above-mentioned provisions. Not only does the model contract notice used for the advertisement refer to what is called the ‘prior information’ procedure and not to the award of contracts, but, more importantly, the information set out in the notice is clearly inadequate when compared with the information that must be included in accordance with the model contract notice set out in the Annexes to Directive 92/50/EEC, as most recently amended by Directive 2001/78/EC.

----

(1)  O J 1992 L 209 p. 1

----
### §123d. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 123d was editorially reclassified as section 6636 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 89 FR 20832, Mar. 25, 2024.

§ 351.506 Loan guarantees. ( a ) *Benefit* — ( 1 ) *In general.* In the case of a loan guarantee, a benefit exists to the extent that the total amount a firm pays for the loan with the government-provided guarantee is less than the total amount the firm would pay for a comparable commercial loan that the firm could actually obtain on the market absent the government-provided guarantee, including any difference in guarantee fees. *See* section 771(5)(E)(iii) of the Act. The Secretary will select a comparable commercial loan in accordance with § 351.505(a).
( 2 ) *Government acting as owner.* In situations where a government, acting as the owner of a firm, provides a loan guarantee to that firm, the guarantee does not confer a benefit if the respondent provides evidence demonstrating that it is normal commercial practice in the country in question for shareholders to provide guarantees to their firms under similar circumstances and on comparable terms.
( b ) *Time of receipt of benefit.* In the case of a loan guarantee, the Secretary normally will consider a benefit as having been received in the year in which the firm otherwise would have had to make a payment on the comparable commercial loan.
( c ) *Allocation of benefit to a particular time period.* In allocating the benefit from a government-provided loan guarantee to a particular time period, the Secretary will use the methods set forth in § 351.505(c) regarding loans.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 79 

To eliminate the disparity in sentencing for cocaine offenses, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 28, 2021 

Mr. BOOKER (for himself and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To eliminate the disparity in sentencing for cocaine offenses, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eliminating a Quan5 tifiably Unjust Application of the Law Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘EQUAL Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 79 IS

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF INCREASED PENALTIES FOR CO2 CAINE OFFENSES WHERE THE COCAINE IN3 VOLVED IS COCAINE BASE. 

4 (a) CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT.—The following 

5 provisions of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 

6 801 et seq.) are repealed: 

7 (1) Clause (iii) of section 401(b)(1)(A) (21 

8 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(A)). 

9 (2) Clause (iii) of section 401(b)(1)(B) (21 

10 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(B)). 

11 (b) CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES IMPORT AND EXPORT

12 ACT.—The following provisions of the Controlled Sub13 stances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 951 et seq.) 

14 are repealed: 

15 (1) Subparagraph (C) of section 1010(b)(1) (21 

16 U.S.C. 960(b)(1)). 

17 (2) Subparagraph (C) of section 1010(b)(2) (21 

18 U.S.C. 960(b)(2)). 

19 (c) APPLICABILITY TO PENDING AND PAST CASES.— 

20 (1) PENDING CASES.—This section, and the 

21 amendments made by this section, shall apply to any 

22 sentence imposed after the date of enactment of this 

23 Act, regardless of when the offense was committed. 

24 (2) PAST CASES.—In the case of a defendant 

25 who, before the date of enactment of this Act, was 

26 convicted or sentenced for a Federal offense involvVerDate Sep 11 2014 19:04 Feb 09, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S79.IS S79

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 79 IS

1 ing cocaine base, the sentencing court may, on mo2 tion of the defendant, the Bureau of Prisons, the at3 torney for the Government, or on its own motion, 

4 impose a reduced sentence after considering the fac5 tors set forth in section 3553(a) of title 18, United 

6 States Code. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2


                       CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



William H.  Hardman,  Jr., the Vice  President,  Treasurer  and Chief  Financial
Officer of Delta Mills, Inc. (the "Company"),  hereby certifies that to the best
of his knowledge:

     1.   The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 28, 2003 of the
          Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
          (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

The foregoing  certification  is being furnished  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350
and is not  being  filed  as  part of the  Report  or as a  separate  disclosure
document.





Date       October 2, 2003              By: /s/ W. H. Hardman, Jr.
      -------------------------------   ------------------------------------
                                        W.H. Hardman, Jr.
                                        Chief Financial Officer



A  signed  copy  of  this  written  statement  required  by  section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.