alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2422.8 What is required to file an intervention or cross-petition? ( a ) *Cross-petitions.* A cross-petition is a petition that involves any employees in a unit covered by a pending representation petition. If you file a cross-petition, it must be filed under the requirements of this subpart.
( b ) *Intervention requests and cross-petitions.* ( 1 ) You may file a request to intervene, along with any necessary showing of interest, with either the Regional Director or the Hearing Officer. This must be filed either in person, or by commercial delivery, first-class mail, certified mail or facsimile. You must file a request to intervene before the hearing opens, unless you show good cause for granting an extension. If no hearing is held, you must file a request to intervene before action is taken under § 2422.30.
( 2 ) You may file a cross-petition, along with any necessary showing of interest, with either the Regional Director or the Hearing Officer. This must be filed electronically through the use of the eFiling system on the FLRA's Web site at *www.flra.gov* or, in person, by commercial delivery, first-class mail, certified mail or facsimile. Any cross-petition must be filed before the hearing opens, unless you show good cause for granting an extension. If no hearing is held, you must file a cross-petition before action is taken under § 2422.30.
( c ) *Labor organization intervention requests.* Except for incumbent intervenors, a labor organization seeking to intervene must submit a statement that it has complied with 5 U.S.C. 7111(e) and one of the following: ( 1 ) A showing of interest of ten percent (10%) or more of the employees in the unit covered by a petition seeking an election, with an alphabetical list of the names of the employees establishing the showing of interest; or
( 2 ) A current or recently expired collective bargaining agreement covering any of the employees in the unit affected by issues raised in the petition; or
( 3 ) Evidence that it is or was, before a reorganization, the recognized or certified exclusive representative of any of the employees affected by issues raised in the petition.
( d ) *Incumbent.* An incumbent exclusive representative, without regard to the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section, will be considered a party in any representation proceeding raising issues that affect employees the incumbent represents, unless it serves the Regional Director with a written disclaimer of any representation interest in the claimed unit.
( e ) *Employing agency.* An agency or activity will be considered a party if any of its employees are affected by issues raised in the petition.
( f ) *Agency or activity intervention.* An agency or activity seeking to intervene in any representation proceeding must submit evidence that one or more employees of the agency or activity may be affected by issues raised in the petition.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov 

No. III-03-039 May 1, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC OVERSIGHT PANEL TO MEET WITH FIRSTENERGY IN LISLE, IL, TO

DISCUSS RESOLUTION OF ENGINEERING DESIGN ISSUES AT DAVIS-BESSE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s staff will meet with FirstEnergy officials on

Wednesday, May 7, to discuss the utility’s ongoing evaluation of the design of key safety systems

at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant. The plant, which has been shut down since February 16

of last year, is located in Oak Harbor, Ohio. 

The meeting will be held at 1 p.m. CDT (2 p.m. EDT) at the NRC’s Region III office, 801

Warrenville Road, in Lisle, Illinois. Visitors should report first to the Second Floor reception

area. The public is invited to observe the business portion of the meeting and will have an

opportunity to make comments and ask questions of the NRC staff before the meeting is

adjourned.

Interested individuals unable to attend may listen to the meeting via telephone by calling:

(800) 857-9602 and using pass code “Davis-Besse” and “Cheryl Hausman” at the prompt. One

hundred phone lines will be available. The meeting will also be available for public viewing by

video conference at the NRC Headquarters, Room T-2B5, One White Flint North, 11555

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

At the meeting FirstEnergy will describe how it believes its engineering reviews offer

reasonable assurance that all safety systems are adequately designed; company representatives

will also discuss significant outstanding design issues and the plans for resolving them.

This is the second public meeting focusing on the status of the design reviews of DavisBesse’s safety systems. The first meeting was held in the NRC’s Region III office in Lisle,

Illinois, on December 23 of last year. Presentation materials for the meeting will be available on

the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/vessel-head-degradation/public-meetings.

html. A meeting transcript will be posted on the web site in several weeks.

The NRC oversight panel, created on April 29 of last year, includes NRC management

and staff from its Region III office in Lisle, Illinois; the NRC Headquarters office in Rockville,

Maryland; and the NRC Resident Inspector Office at the Davis-Besse site.
Documents on the Davis-Besse corrosion issue, including further details on NRC’s

oversight panel activities, are posted on the NRC’s web site at: http://www.nrc.gov. Select

“Davis-Besse” from the Key Topics menu.

###
### §1384. Allotment of funds

#### (a) Formula

Sums authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section for each of fiscal years 1989 and 1990 shall be allotted by the Administrator in accordance with section 1285(c) of this title.

#### (b) Reservation of funds for planning

Each State shall reserve each fiscal year 1 percent of the sums allotted to such State under this section for such fiscal year, or $100,000, whichever amount is greater, to carry out planning under sections 1285(j) and 1313(e) of this title.

#### (c) Allotment period

#### (1) Period of availability for grant award

Sums allotted to a State under this section for a fiscal year shall be available for obligation by the State during the fiscal year for which sums are authorized and during the following fiscal year.

#### (2) Reallotment of unobligated funds

The amount of any allotment not obligated by the State by the last day of the 2-year period of availability established by paragraph (1) shall be immediately reallotted by the Administrator on the basis of the same ratio as is applicable to sums allotted under subchapter II of this chapter for the second fiscal year of such 2-year period. None of the funds reallotted by the Administrator shall be reallotted to any State which has not obligated all sums allotted to such State in the first fiscal year of such 2-year period.

(June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title VI, §604, as added Pub. L. 100–4, title II, §212(a), Feb. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 25.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Use of Capitalization Grant Funds for Construction Grants

Pub. L. 101–144, title III, Nov. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 858, as amended by Pub. L. 101–302, title II, May 25, 1990, 104 Stat. 238, provided: "That, notwithstanding any other provision of law, sums heretofore, herein or hereafter appropriated under this heading ["Environmental Protection Agency" and "construction grants"] allotted for title VI [33 U.S.C. 1381 et seq.] capitalization grants to American Samoa, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, the Republic of Palau (or its successor entity), Virgin Islands and the District of Columbia, may be used for title II [33 U.S.C. 1281 et seq.] construction grants at the request of the chief executive of each of the above named entities, and sums appropriated in fiscal year 1989 shall remain available for obligation until September 30, 1992."
### §1265. In-place toxic pollutants

The Administrator is directed to identify the location of in-place pollutants with emphasis on toxic pollutants in harbors and navigable waterways and is authorized, acting through the Secretary of the Army, to make contracts for the removal and appropriate disposal of such materials from critical port and harbor areas. There is authorized to be appropriated $15,000,000 to carry out the provisions of this section, which sum shall be available until expended.

(June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title I, §115, as added Pub. L. 92–500, §2, Oct. 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 833.)
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of GLOBAL EPOINT, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Toresa Lou, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



May 23, 2005



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Toresa Lou         
|Toresa Lou,            
|Chief Executive Officer



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of GLOBAL EPOINT, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Pan, Chief Financial Officer and
Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



May 23, 2005



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|                                    
|/s/ John Pan                        
|John Pan,                           
|Chief Financial Officer and Chairman



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-60899

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Enoch Buckley, III, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

No. 2:20-CR-44-1

Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Enoch Buckley, III, pleaded guilty, per a plea agreement, of possession 

of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He

was sentenced, above the advisory guideline range, to 120 months of imprisonment. Buckley waived his right to appeal, but he reserved the right to 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 13, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-60899 Document: 00516355148 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/13/2022
No. 21-60899

2

appeal a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. On appeal, he maintains 

that his above-guidelines sentence was substantively unreasonable. Instead

of a brief, the government has filed an opposed motion for dismissal, seeking 

enforcement of the appeal waiver, or, in the alternative, summary affirmance.

A defendant may waive the statutory right to appeal in a valid plea 

agreement. United States v. McKinney, 406 F.3d 744, 746 (5th Cir. 2005). 

“This court reviews de novo whether an appeal waiver bars an appeal.” 

United States v. Keele, 755 F.3d 752, 754 (5th Cir. 2014). We “conduct a twostep inquiry: (1) whether the waiver was knowing and voluntary and 

(2) whether the waiver applies to the circumstances at hand, based on the 

plain language of the agreement.” United States v. Bond, 414 F.3d 542, 544 

(5th Cir. 2005).

The record demonstrates that Buckley knowingly and voluntarily 

waived his right to appeal, and the appellate waiver applies in this circumstance. See McKinney, 406 F.3d at 746; United States v. Portillo, 18 F.3d 290, 

292 (5th Cir. 1994); United States v. Melancon, 972 F.2d 566, 567–68 (5th Cir. 

1992).

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is 

DISMISSED. The government’s alternative motion for summary affirmance is DENIED as unnecessary.

Case: 21-60899 Document: 00516355148 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/13/2022
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**LIST OF CONTROLLED ENTITIES AS OF APRIL 29, 2004**

 

As of April 29, 2004 our listing of controlled entities is as follows: 

 

Barbeques Galore Limited 

*whose controlledentities are:*

 

Barbeques Galore (Aust) Pty Limited

*whose controlled entities are:*

 

Galore Pty Limited 

The Galore Group (International) Pty Limited 

*whose controlled entity is:*

 

The Galore Group (U.S.A.), Inc. 

*whose controlled entities are:*

 

Barbeques Galore, Inc. 

Barbeques Galore Online, Inc.**

 

Barbeques Galore Services Pty Limited 

*whose controlled entities are:*

 

Cook-on-Gas Products (Australia) Pty Limited 

*whose controlled entities are:*

 

Bosmana Pty Limited 

Cougar Leisure Products Pty Limited 

 

G.L.G. Australia Pty Limited 

*whose controlled entities are:*

 

Australian Enamellers Pty Limited 

Douglas Manufacturing Pty Limited 

Park-Tec Engineering Pty Limited 

 

Pricotech Leisure Brands Pty Limited 

Redgun Pty Limited 

 

Galore Group Nominees Pty Limited 

GLG Trading Pte Limited 

Vilbrent Pty Limited 

 

(a):  All the abovementioned controlled entities are incorporated in Australia withthe exception of: 

 

The Galore Group (U.S.A.),Inc.; 

Barbeques Galore, Inc.; and 

Barbeques Galore Online, Inc. 

 

which are incorporated in the United States of America; and 

 

GLG Trading Pte Limited 

 

which is incorporated in Singapore. 

 

(b):  All the abovementioned controlled entities have ordinary shares as issued share capital and are 100% owned.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-145 September 25, 2000

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, ON OCTOBER 5 - 7

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has

scheduled a meeting on October 5-7 in Rockville, Maryland, to discuss, among other issues,

the Union of Concerned Scientists’ (UCS) recent report on nuclear power plant risk studies.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s

Two White Flint North building, at 11545 Rockville Pike, starting at 8:30 a.m. each day.

On the opening day, the committee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with

representatives of the Union of Concerned Scientists, the NRC staff and other interested stakeholders

on a UCS report on nuclear plant risk studies issued last month. It also will discuss proposed industry

probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) peer review process certification guidelines with the Nuclear

Energy Institute and NRC staff members. In addition, the committee will review the staff’s recent

response to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers’ draft standard for probabilistic risk

assessment for nuclear power plant applications.

Other opening day items include discussion with the staff regarding the pressurized thermal

shock technical bases re-evaluation project, the preparation of draft committee reports, and the

discussion of proposed ACRS reports and topics for the next day’s session with NRC Commissioners.

Topics discussed will include use of risk insights in nuclear power plant regulations, the quality of

PRAs, the spent fuel pool fire safety study, thermal-hydraulic codes and the status of ACRS activities

on nuclear plant license renewals.

On October 6, the committee will continue its discussion of risk topics before it meets with the

Commissioners at 9:30 a.m. The committee then will hear a presentation by Ralph Beedle of the NEI

on industry issues, discuss equipment qualification with NRC staff, and review the generic guidance

documents associated with license renewal. Also, the committee will review responses from the NRC

Executive Director for Operations on comments and recommendations included in recent ACRS

reports and letters.

The final day’s agenda will include committee discussion of the format and content of its

annual report to the Commission on the NRC Safety Research Program, as well as a variety of

miscellaneous items.
Those who wish to make oral or written statements, or seek additional information on the

meeting or changes to the agenda, should contact James Lyons, at 301-415-7371.

ACRS meeting notices, transcripts and letters are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW/ .

##
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI # I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-19-0000870

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I NOE RAQUINIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF HAWAI # I; HAWAI # I POLICE DEPARTMENT; JEREMY LEWIS; EDWARD LEWIS; MARCO SEGOBIA; KYLE HIRAYAMA; SEAN SMITH; MICHAEL HARDIE; FRANK MILLER, Defendants-Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 3CC19100099K)

ORDER (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and McCullen, JJ.) Upon review of the Motion for Reconsideration filed by Noe **Raquinio**on April 16, 2024, the papers in support, and the record, it appears that: 1. Raquinio moves for reconsideration of our Summary Disposition Order filed on April 12, 2024; and 2. The motion presents no point of law or fact we overlooked or misapprehended. See Rule 40(b), Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure. Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-19-0000870 18-APR-2024 08:00 AM Dkt. 127 ODMRNOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI # I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, April 18, 2024. /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Acting Chief Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge

2
#### John Green, Respondent, v. Ella V. Steinberg, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Imperial Equities, Inc., Appellant, against William W. Mills et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondents. [740-742 8th Ave., 264 — 268 W. 46th St., Borough of Manhattan]

No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### §5354. Grants for fighting money laundering and related financial crimes

(a) In General.—After the end of the 1-year period beginning on the date the first national strategy for combating money laundering and related financial crimes is submitted to the Congress in accordance with section 5341, and subject to subsection (b), the Secretary may review, select, and award grants for State or local law enforcement agencies and prosecutors to provide funding necessary to investigate and prosecute money laundering and related financial crimes in high-risk money laundering and related financial crime areas.

(b) Special Preference.—Special preference shall be given to applications submitted to the Secretary which demonstrate collaborative efforts of two or more State and local law enforcement agencies or prosecutors who have a history of Federal, State, and local cooperative law enforcement and prosecutorial efforts in responding to such criminal activity.

(Added Pub. L. 105–310, §2(a), Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2948.)
Searched for **http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/UserFiles/works/pdfs/ri8665.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/UserFiles/works/pdfs/ri8665.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Exhibit 32



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Conceptus, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i)    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                           
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Dated: August 14, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/    MARK M. SIECZKAREK                 
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | Mark M. Sieczkarek Chief Executive
Officer



---

Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Conceptus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i)    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)    the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                       
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Dated: August 14, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/    GLEN K. FURUTA                 
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | Glen K. Furuta Chief Financial
Officer