P. 1


# OAR Box 1851 Prepped by Keeia Richards



### Document

Number: 

# 41 ) ll-A-1 5 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 11/19/2008 11:19:52 AM Sheet 41 of 41P. 2

| \ 

# i Unite d State s Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Offic e o f A. r Quaiitv A~90- 1 9 Ptannin c an a Standard s nam e Researc h 'riangi e Part N C 2771 1 ll-A " I O Ai r 

# -EP A Benzen e - Organi c 

# Chemica l Manufacturin g Emissio n Tes t Repor t Ethylbenzer.e/Styren e Amoc o Chemical s Compan y Texa s City , Texa s r" \ 

# iin i

: ; ut
_ 

## 'i f
• ' < 

### '99 2 II t^i-..^. ^ | 

### P A AI R DOCKE T

i- J

. *-V>?VTOW>i*S ^P. 3

2. 1 BENZENE/TOLUEN E COLUM N RECOVERYSYSTE M (Figur e 2.1 , point s 2 an d3 ) Th e recovere dliquid s fro m th e benzene/toluen e recover y syste m wer e obtaine da t poin t 2 . Poin t 3 wa s a sampl e o f th e non-condensable s fro m th e recover y

syste m t o th e plan t fuel . Bot hsample s wer e take nsimul taneously . Th e liqui dsampl e a t poin t 2 separate dint o a hydrocarbo nan da wate r layer . Th e sample s wer e shake nt o for m a singl e phas e an

dthe n injecte dint o th e ga s chromatograph . Result s ar e show ni nTabl e 2.1 . Th e volume s o f eac hlaye r wer e measure dan dth e percen t wate r laye r 1 s reporte dinTabl e 2.1 . Th e liqui dflow rat e wa s determine db y recordin g th e time require dt o accumulat e a tota l volume o f fiv e gallons . Th e tota l condensabie s recovere dwer e directe dint o th e fiv e gallo ncontaine r b y closin g of f th " norma l recover y drai nvalv e an

dshuntin g th e flow

t o th e containe r b

y openin g th e samplin g valve . Result s o f th e analysi s o f poin t 3 sample s ar e show ni nTabl e 2.2 . Flow s a t poin t 3 wer e obtaine dfro m a plan t orific e whic hwa s connecte d t o a squar e roo t differentia l pressur e meter . Th e result s o f thes e flow s ar e show

ni nTabl e 2.2 . Th e orific e calibratio nshee t andexampl e calculation s ar e containe di nth e Appendices . 2. 2 COLUM

N HO T WEL L VENT S (Figur e 2.1 , sampl e point s 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ) Thi s sectio ninclude s th e result s o f testin g a t th e ethy l benzen e colum nhotwel l liqui d(poin t 6 ) andven t t o th e atmospher e (poin t 7) . Als o discusse dar e result s fro m th e vent s o f th e PE B hotwel l (poin t 8 )

Th e sampl e locatio nnumerica l designation s ar e no t sequential . Poten tia l tes t location s i nth e proces s wer e identifie dprio r t o a prelim inar y surve y a t th e facility . Durin g th e initia l visit , i t wa s determine dtha t some o f th e propose dlocation s eithe r di dno t exis t o r coul dno t be sampled . T o maintai ncontinuit y fo r th e overal l projec t record , th e origina l locatio ndesignation s wer e retained , therefore , result s fo r tes t Point s 1 , 4 , 5 , and1 0 d o no t exist .P. 4
2 an dth e styren e purificatio nho t wel l (Poin t 9 ) . Th e fou r sampling point s wer e teste dsimultaneously . Th e result s o f th e analyse s ar e containe di nTable s 2. 3 throug h2.6 . Flow s wer e monitore da t th e ho t wel l vent s (Point s 7 , 8 , an d9 ) befor e an

dafte r testin g wit ha 4-inc hvan e anemometer , whic hwa s adapte dt o fi t th e tw

o an don e hal f Inc hven t pipe . Th e four-Inc h diamete r wa s use dinth e calculation s fo r tota l flow . Calculation s an d dat a ar e containe di nAppendi xA . Flow s o f th e liquid s wer e no t deter mined . Th e liqui dsample s wer e analyze da t th e Raleigh , N.C . Laboratory . The y wer e thoroughl y

mixe dan

dinjecte dint o th e ga s chromatograph . Ther e wa s no apparen t water/hydrocarbo nphas e separatio ni nthes e samples . Th e mai nconstituen t wa s wate r wit htrac e amount s o f hydro carbon s present . Th e result s o f th e liqui dsample s ar e liste di nTabl e 2.3 . 2. 3 STEA

M SUPERHEATE R(Figur e 2.2 ) Th e purpos e o f thi s thir dserie s o f test s wa s t o determin e th e destructio nefficienc y fo r th e incineratio no f benzen e i nth e proces s heater . Th e fue l inpu t t o th e boile r (Poin t 12) , an dth e outle t t o atmospher e o f th e stea m superheate r (Poin t 11 ) wer e teste dsimulta neousl y an dth e result s obtaine db y on-sit e analysis . Th e benzen e concentratio nfoundi nth e firs t runa t th e outle t locatio nwa s muc h highe r tha nexpected . Blan k test s onth e samplin g syste m confirme dtha t residua l organi c contaminatio nwa s presen t 1 nth e apparatus . Th e samplin g procedure s wer e change ds o tha t glas s samplin g flask s wer e use d i nplac e o f th e EP A

Metho d11 0 flexibl e ba g system . A ninitia l run indicate dtha t th e modifie dprocedur e hadeliminate dth e contamination . However , subsequen t sample s yielde dresult s tha t wer e variabl e an d 

### 1 Th e tes t pla ninclude dmeasuremen t o f flo w an dVO C concentratio nfro m th e ven t t o atmospher e o f a collecto r pum pfo r th e ethy l benzen e recycl e colum nandstyren e purificatio ncolum nho t wel l overflows . A t th e time o f testing , i t wa s determine dtha t th e pumpin g rat e fro m th e collecto r wa s metere dbase dona constan t leve l contro l an doperate s continuously . Therefore , ther e wa s theoreticall y n o ne t displacemen t o f ai r t o th e atmospher e durin g operation . Preliminar y flo w measurement s confirme d tha t n o flo w

t o atmospher e wa s occuring , therefor e n o sample s wer e collecte dfo r VO C andbenzen e determination .P. 5

r 

# F inconsistent . I na nattemp t t o clarif y th e results , blank s onth e glas s sampling syste

m an dth e ga s chromatograp hinjectio nsyste m wer e run . A satisfactor y

blank o f th e syste

m wa s no t achieved . Appendi xA contain s th e blank serie s tha t wa s ru ndurin g testing . Ga s chromatograp hresult s reporte di nth e followin g table s ar e uncorrecte dfo r blanks . Thes e result s ar e continue dinTable s 2. 7 and2.8 . Tabl e 2. 9 contain s result s o f th e benzen e destructio nefficienc y andflow

data . Th e stud y o f th e superheate r reveale dproblem s i nth e testin g procedures . (The sequenc e o f problem s ar e presente dwit hth e Superheate r Study i nAppendi xA . Th e firs t problem i ntestin g wa s th e contaminatio n o f th e Metho d11 0 Samplin g Apparatus . Th e firs t tes t ru na t th e Super heate r outle t reveale da highleve l o f benzen e ( ^ 6 0 ppm) . Th e sourc e o f thi s highleve l wa s du e impar t t o th e memor y effec t o f th e sampling apparatu s bein g previousl y use dfo r testin g th e highlevel s o f benzen e a t th e hotwel l vents . A blankin g study

o f th e samplin g apparatu s reveale d th e sampl e bag s containe da 2 0 pp m leve l o f benzen e afte r bein g purge d wit hnitrogen ; a chec k o f th e flowmeter s i nth e syste m reveale da 2 0 pp

m benzen e leve l o f contamination . Th e blankin g procedur e wa s carrie dou t onth e detectio ninstrument s an da nitroge npurgin g o f th e sampl e loo p gav e benzen e result s o f n o lowe r tha n4 ppm . A nalternativ e t o th e samplin g procedur e wa s adapte dsinc e adequat e cleanin g o f th e Metho d11 0 apparatu s coul dno t b

e achieved . Th e samplin g syste

m wa s adapte di norde r t o obtai ngra bsample s i n a glas s flask . Th e glas s samplin g bom bmetho dals o encountere ddifficulties . Th e cleanin g o f th e glas s bom bwit hisopropy l alcoho l wa s believe dt o interfer e wit hth e benzen e readin g du e t o simila r retentio ntimes . Th e 1 0 c c syring e use dfo r sampl e injectio nfro m th e glas s sampl e bom bwa s determine dt o be to o smal l a volum e t o adequatel y flus ha G C sampl e loo p o f 2- 4 ml tota l volume . A blan k procedur e wa s attempte do nth e glas s bom bsampl e metho dandth e resul t wa s approximatel y a t 2 pp m o f benzene . Blankin g o f th e samplin g loo pandga s chromatograp hbetwee neac htes t ru nyielde dresult s a t th e 1 pp m level . Thi s consisten t backgroun do f benzen e wa s considere dt o b e du e i npar t t o th e time fo r a nunheate d sampl e t o purg e bac k t o zero .P. 6



### Ambien t sample s wer e obtaine dwit ha nOV A tota l hydrocarbo nanalyze r an dth e resul t wa s benzen e level s rangin g fro m 5-1 0 ppm . Th e testin g o f th e superheate r wa s ende dan dhypothese s onth e testin g procedure s wer e derive dfro

m subsequen t la bstudie s an dinformatio ngathere ddurin g testing . Some o f th e conclusion s are : 1 . Th e samplin g appratu s canno t b e adequatel y cleane db

y simpl e purgin g afte r exposur e t o highleve l aromatic s (exampl e • benzene) . 2 . Glasswar e expose dt o aromati c compound s canno t be cleane d using purgin g an

dsolven t rinse s alone . 3 . A nunheate dsampl e loo ponth e ga s chromatograp hdoe s no t purg e t o zer o quickly . 4 . Th e syring e use dfo r sampl e injectio nwa s to o smal l t o adequatel y

flus han dfil l th e G.C . sampl e loops . Wit hthes e testin g problem s i nmin dth e preparation , samplin g an danalysi s procedur e fo r furthe r testin g o f thi s typ e hav e bee nmodifie d t o accomodat e thes e conclusions . Du e t o th e configuratio no f th e stac k an dabsenc e o f adequat e ports , a noutle t volumetri c flow rat e coul dno t b e measured . Sinc e i t i s necessar y

t o calculat e th e benzen e remova l effecienc y o na mas s basis , a combustio ncalculatio nusin g th e fue l andflu e ga s analysi s wa s performe dt o calculat e a combustio ndilutio nfacto r fo r adjustin g th e measure dinle t andoutle t benzen e concentration s t o th e same volume basis . A carbo nbalanc e base dohth e combustio ncalculation s yield s significantl y

differen t exhaus t ga s C0 2 

### concentration s fro m thos e directl y measured . Base do nthi s difference , i t i s probabl e tha t th e fue l ga s analyse s ar e Inaccurate . Du e t o th e difficult y o f achievin g accurat e result s o nth e G C system use dfo r C , - C g

### analysi s whe nC 1 

### exceed s 5 volume %, th e result s fo r methan e ar e probabl y low , andsinc e hydroge nwa s determine db y difference , tha t resul t i s probabl y high .P. 7

Du e t o th e difficultie s encountere dwit hinterferences , blanking , analysis , an

dcombustio ncalculation s th e flu e ga s analysi s obtaine da t th e superheate r canno t b e use dwit hconfidence . Thes e samplin g an d analysi s problem s hav e bee nsubsequentl y remedie dan

dtest s conducte d afte r thi s d o no t contai ndat a wit hthes e problems .

8P. 8

Noncondensable s fro m Benzene/Toluen e Colum n Condense r

• > i Ven t Recover y System 

# ©

- > Noncondensable s t o Plan t Fue l Syste

m

i——(I ) Recovere dLiquid s

FIGUR E 2- 1 SAMPL E LOCATION S - B/ T COLUM N VEN T RECOVER

V SVSTEM S

# • r P. 9

Fro m L^ i benzene m Recycl e Colum n 

# y

San^l e 

# S ^ Ho t 

# ©

Ven t t o Atmospher e 

# A

otwel 1 

# © Fro m Styren e Purificatio n Colum n 

# M '
Ven t t o Atmospher e 

# r | ^Overflo w

\ ^ [ Collecto r 5

un p 

# © Ven t t o Atmospher e 

# A

'Hotwel l System Purificatio n Colum n

- ^ Wate r Ou t

fro m PE P Colum

n
*

Wate r Ou t <£ - V 2 / Ven t t o Atmospher e

Hotwel l

FIGUR E 2. 2 SAMPL E LOCATION S - HOTWEL L VENT S 1 0(2 ) Flu e Ga s t o M M

Othe r fue l feed s fro

m proces s

H 2 Separatio nVen t ^ t

_—.. . y

Benzene/Toluen e Hotwel l Ven t

• > j Fue l Mi xDru m

i .

Natura l Ga s / Steam Superheate r

FIGUR E 2.3 : Stea

m Superheate r System Amoco , EB/ S Texa s City , Texa sP.1 1

COMPOUN D * (RU N 2-1 ) BENZEN E TOLUEN E ETHYLBENZENE WATE R COMPOSIT E (RU N 2-2 ) BENZEN E TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE WATE R COMPOSIT E (RU N 2-3 ) BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE WATE R COMPOSIT E (AVERAGE ) BENZENE TOLUEN E ETHYLBENZEN E WATE R COMPOSIT E WEIGH T % (LIQUID )

59. 4 26. 3 

### 9. 8 4. 5

50. 9 31. 4 

### 6. 4 11. 3

63. 5 23. 3 10. 6 

### 2. 6

57. 9 27. 0 

### 8. 9 6. 1 VOLUME %

(LIQUID )

59. 4 26. 7 10. 0 

### 3. 9

51. 3 32. 1 

### 6. 6 10. 0

63. 4 23. 6 10. 7 

### 2. 3

58. 0 27. 5 

### 9. 1 5. 4 WEIGH T

(GRAM/L )

522. 1 231. 2 86. 7 39. 0

450. 9 278. 0 57. 2 100. 0

557. 3 204. 4 92. 8 23. 0

510. 1 237. 9 78. 9 54. 0 FLO

W (LPM )

1.0 4

1.1 0

1.0 8

1.0 7 

### '"Liqui dsampl e analysi s converte dfro m vapo r phas e result s t o equivlen t liqui dphas e concentratio n(se e sampl e calculatio ni nAppendi xA. ) Al l value s calculate dfro m pp m a s benzene . Runs 2- 4 and 2- 5 wer e no t include ddu e t o proces s inconsistency . TABL E 2.1 : COMPOSITIO N O F TH E RECOVERE D LIQUI D STREA M A T TH E BENZENE / TOLUEN E COLUM

N VENT : SAMPL E POIN T 2

1 2P.1 2

| RU

N NO
. I specie s Analysi s

^ C- l C- 2 C- 3 C- 4 C- 5 C- 6 BENZEN E TOLUEN E ETHYLBENZEN E STYREN E
Tota l Hydrocarbon s By : " " specie s summatio n tota l H C analyze r

Inert s an d Flo w Dat a H2O , %b yvol
. N2 , %b yvol
. O2 , %b yvol
. C0 2 , %b yvol
. Flo w rate , scfin* , dr y Tota l {%) 3 - ppm va s benzen e 1004. 3 3993. 1 1365. 1 45325. 4 442S-. 5 N.D
. 19325. 7 337. 0 634. 9 135. 1

77310. 5

n/ m 64. 1 3. S 12. 6 76. 4 90. 4 1 ppm va s specie s 4268. 4 9064. 2 2129. 5 59376. 3 4514. 0 N.D
. 19325. 7 273. 8 436. 5 82. 3

99907. 5

1
6 3- 2

ppm va s benzen e 970. 7 3861. 1 1266. 0 40132. 0 4145. 2 N.D
. 17098. 0 232. 3 359. 0 69. 1

68133. 4 ppm

va s specie s 4125. 4 8764. 1 1975. 0 52572. 9 4228. 1 N.D
. 17098. 0 188. 7 246. 8 113. 4

89312. 9

n/ m 64. 6 3. 0 13. 0 72.8 6 89. 5 3- 3

ppm vas benzen e 947. 2 2340. 3 1305. 7 38605. 8 3277. 1 N.D
. 16361. 8 263. 6 713. 2 170. 3

63985. 0 ppm

va s specie s 4025. 7 5312. 5 2036. 8 50573. 6 3342. 6 N.D
. 16361. 8 214. 1 490. 3 103. 8

82461. 2

n/ m 65. 7 4. 1 12. 9 71.7 4 90. 9
I - NO T DETECTED 20OC , lat m 1 - no tmeasured TABL E 2. 2 POIN T 3 ANALYSI S SUMMAR Y B/ T COLUM

N VEN T 1 3P.1 3

Ru n#
Benzene * Ethy l benzen e Styren e 6- 1

N.D . N.D . N.D . 6- 2

44 3 5 N.D . 6- 3

61 1 2 9 1 1 

### *A1 1 value s give ni npp m a s benzen e (volume/volume ) N.D . - NO T DETECTE D

TABL E 2.3 : COMPOSITION O F TH E ETHYLBENZEN E RECYCL E COLUM N HO T WEL L WATE R •(POIN T 6 )

1 4P.1 4 

# f
RU

N NO . Specie s Analysi s
r.- i

' C- 2 C-3 C- 4 C- 5 C-6 BENZEN E TOLUEN E ETHYLBENZEN E STYREN E
Tota l Hydrocarbon s By : •" " specie s summatio n tota l H C analyze r

Inert s an d Flo wDat a H2O , % by vol . N2 , % b y vol . O2 , % b y vol . C0 2 , % by vol . Flo wrate , acfm . Tota l {%) 7- 1 ppm v a s benzen e 0.5 5 N. D N. D 11. 7 N.D . N.D . 4843. 4 5778. 8 666 1 18 6

17481. 4 •

6. 5 72. 6 18. 0 <3 0 D 9. 7 98. 5 ppm

v a s specie s 2. 3 N.D . N.D . 15. 3 N.D . N.D . 4843. 4 4695. 4 4579. 4 113. 3
14249. 1

D m 8 7- 2

ppm v a s benzen e 2. 5 N.D . N.D . 35. 3 N.D . N.D . 4667. 6 5452. 6 6446. 7 180. 5
16785. 2

5 . 73 . 18 . <3 0 8 . 98 . ppm

v a s specie s 10. 5 N.D . N.D . 46. 2 N.D . N.D . 4667. 6 4430. 2 4432. 1 

## n o

13696. 6

5 6 0 DD m 3 6 4 7- 3

ppm v a s benzen e 2. 7 3. 7 N.D . 15. 4 N.D . N.D . 4176. 1 3881. 1 3164. 6 79. 7
11323. 3 ppm

v a s specie s 11. 7 8. 4 N.D . 20. 2 N.D . N.D . 4176. 1 4776. 8 4603. 1 130. 8

13727. 1

4. 7 71. 6 17. 6 <3 0 DD m 8.2 9 95. 2

D 

### - - No t Detecte d TABL E 2. 4 - POIN T 7 ANALYSI S SUMMAR Y PE B COLUM N VEN T
1 5

# f
RU

N NO
. Specie s Analysi s S ^ C- l s ^ C- 2 S C- 3

' C- 4 ^ C- 5 C- 6 BENZEN E TOLUEN E ETHYLBENZEN E STYREN E ' Tota l Hydrocarbon s By : " " specie s summatio n tota l H C analyze r

Inert s an d Flo wDat a H2O , %b yvol
. N2 , %b yvol
. O2 , %b yvol
. C0 2 , %b yvol
. Flo w rate , acfm . Tota l (%) 8- 1 ppm v a s benzen e 948. 2 57. 2 22. 2 8. 7 3.2 2 N.D
. 325. 0 33. 2 199. 0 19. 7
161 4 53 1 ppm

v a s specie s 4029. 8 128. 2 31. 8 11. 4 N.D
. N.D
. 325. 0 27. 0 137. 4 12. 0
4702. 6

6. 5 74. 6 17.' 2 N.D
. 35.3 5 98. 7 8- 2

ppm v a s benzen e 0.5 3 4. 9 1. 2 42. 0 N.D
. N.D
. 1460. 4 34. 1 215. 3 22. 9
1781. 3 179 8 ppm

v a s specie s 2. 3 11. 1 1. 9 55. 0 N.D
. N.D
. 1460. 4 27. 7 148 13. 9
1720. 3

5. 5 80. 6 10. 3 N.D
. 38.3 5 96. 6 8- 3

ppm v a s benzen e 0.9 1 5. 9 N.D
. 37.7 N.D
. N.D
. 1120. 5 40. 7 986. 7 102. 7
2285. 9 ppm

vas specie s 3. 9 13. 5 N.D
. 37. 4 N.D
. N.D
. 1120. 5 33. 0 678. 4 62. 6
1966. 3

4. 7 77. 5 11. 2 N.D
. 8.6 1 93. 6
D « - No t Detecte d

TABL E 2. 5 - POIN T8 ANALYSI S SUMMAR Y - ETHYLBENZEN E COLUM N VEN T
1 6P.1 6 

# f RU

N NO. 9 jpecie s Analysi s

^ " ^ C- 1 S C-2 / ^ ^ C-3
^ C-

4
^ C-

5

" C-6

" BENZEN

E

" TOLUEN

E

" ETHYLBENZEN

E

' STYREN

E " rnta l Hydrocarbon s By : "Specie s summatio n tota l H C analyze r

Inert s an d Flo

wDat a H2O , % b y vol . N2 , % b y vol . O2 , % b y vol . C0 2 , % b y vol . Flo wrate , acfm . Tota l (% ) 9- '

ppm v a s benzen e 31. 2 4. 8 4. 4 11. 3 N.D . N.D . 36. 3 346. 3 9726. 4 1281. 7

11442. 4 2433 9

6 . 75 . 15 . <3 0 8 . 98 . 1 ppm

v a s specie s 132. 5 11. 0 6. 9 14. 9 N.D . N.D . 36. 3 281. 4 6686. 9 781. 0

7950. 9

5 6 4 " pp m 41 3 9-2

ppm v a s benzen e 6. 0 1. 1 N.D . 7. 7 N.D . N.D . 36. 9 361. 8 10364. 4 1639. 7

12417. 6 2303 5

5 . 73 . 16 . <3 0 8 . 96 . ppm

v a s specie s 25. 4 2. 4 N.D . 10. O N.D . N.D . 36. 9 293. 9 7125. 5 999. 3

8493. 4

5 6 3 pp m 2 3 3 9-3

ppm v a s benzen e 2. 8 1. 0 1. 3 9. 0 5. 6 N.D . 73. 8 332. 4 6383. 2 749. 6

7558. 7 ppm

v a s specie s 12. 2 2. 4 2. 2 11. 9 5. 7 N.D . 73. 8 270. C 4388. 6 456. 8

5223. 7

4. 7 73. 6 15. 4 <30 pp m 3.4 9 94. 2 No t Detecte d


# L TABL E 2. 6 - POIN T 9 ANALYSI S SUMMAR Y- STYREN E PURIFICATION HOTWEL L PUM P VEN T . 1 7P.1 7 

# F
RU

N NO
. H Specie s Analysi s 

# '^"7- 1
^ - 2 ^^C- 3 ^C- 4 C- 5 C- 6 BENZENE TOLUEN E ETHYLBENZEN E STYRENE
Tota l Hydrocarbon s By : "* " specie s summatio n tota l H C analyze r

Inert s an d Flo wDat a H2O , % b yvol
. N2 , 5 5 b yvol
. O2 , % b yvol
. C0 2 , %b yvol
. Flow rate , scfm* , dr y Tota l (%) 1 1 ppm v a s benzen e 0.1 2 N.D . N.D . 4. 2 N.D . 0.7 2 2. 8 1. 6 8. 6 2. 0

20. 0 - 1

*

4. 7 76. 7 8. 6 6. 6

- - 96. 6 ppm v a s species 0. 5 N.D
. N.D
. 5. 5 N.D
. 0.8 6 2. 8 1. 3 5. 9 1. 2
18. 1 11 -

ppm v a s benzen e 1. 2 4. 6 51. 0 96. 5 N.D
. 3213. 7 34. 0 12. 2 51. 5 5. 0

3469. 7 2 ppm

v a s species 4. 9 10. 4 79. 6 126. 5 N.D
. 3213. 7 34. 0 9. 9 35. 3 3. 1
3517. 4

4. 1 74. 2 8. 6 13. 1

— 100. 0 1 1

ppm v a s benzen e 0.2 3 N.D
. N.D
. N.D
. N.D
. N.D
. 11. 9 4. 6 27. 8 5. 5
50. 0 - 3 ppm v a s specie s 0.9 7 N.D
. N.D
. N.D
. N.D
. N.D
. 11. 9 3. 5 18. 2 3. 1
37.6 7

3. 7 75. 5 8. 6 12. 2

— 100. 0


### ° - - Not Detecte d 20OC , latm
TABL E 2. 7 - POIN T 1 1 ANALYSI S SUMMARY- STEA M SUPERHEATE ROUTLE T 18P.1 8 

# f
RU

N NO . 1 1 | specie s Analysi s C- 1 C- 2 C- 3 C- 4 C- 5 C- 6 BENZEN E TOLUEN E ETHYLBENZEN E STYRENE
Tota l Hydrocarbon s By : specie s summatio n tota l H C analyze r

Inert s an d Flo wDat a H2O , %b yvol . N2 , %b yvol
. O2 , %b yvol
. C0 2 , %b yvol . Flo w rate , scfm* , dr y Tota l (%

) 11- 4

ppm v a s benzen e 0.2 1 N.D . N.D . 5 5 N.D . N.D . 5. 5 3. 1 22. 6 4. 6

91. 0 ppm

v a s specie s

5. 7 73. 8 8\ 6 11. 9

— 100. 0 0. 9

N.D . N.D . 72. 1 N.D . N.D . 5. 5 2. 5 15. 5 2. 8

99. 3 1 1

ppm v a s benzen e 5. 0 N.D
. N.D
. N.D
. 6. 6 N.D
. 4. 4 1. 5 8. 5 0. 9

26. 9 - 5

ppm v a s specie s

4. 6 79. 8 8. 8 6. 8

— 100. 0 21. 1

N.D . N.D . N.D . 6. 9 N.D . 4. 4 1. 2 5. 8 0.5 '

39. 9 1 1

ppm v a s benzen e 6. 3 3. 8 4. 2 5. 0 204. 4 0. 5 15. 3 1. 7 8. 6 0. 9

250. 7 - 6

ppm va s specie s 26. 8 8. 6 6. 5 6. 6 208. 5 0.42 15. 3 1. 4 5. 9 0.5 5

280.5 7

3.8 5 81. 3 7. 7 7. 2

— 100. 1
D 

### - - No t Detecte d G20OC , lat

m
TABL E 2. 7 - POIN T 7 1 ANALYSI S SUMMARY(CONTINUED )

STEA M SUPERHEATE ROUTLE T

1 9P.1 9 

# I r- 

# -
RU N NO . 1 1 Specie s Analysi s 

### c- 1 C- 2 C- 3 C- 4 C- 5 . C- 6 BENZEN E TOLUEN E ETHYLBENZEN E STYREN E ' Tota l Hydrocarbon s By : specie s summatio n tota l H C analyze r

Inert s an d Flo wDat a H2O , % b y vol . N2 , % b y vol . O2 , % b y vol . C0 2 , % b y vol . [ Flowrate , scfm* , dr y Tota l (% )

• D - - No t Detecte d •20OC , ut m TASL E 2 . 11- 7 ppm va s benzen e 1. 5 N.D . N.D . N.D . 56. 2 N.D . 4. 5 1. 7 10. 6 1. 2

75. 7 ppm

v a s specie s 6. 4 N.D . N.D . N.D . 57. 3 N.D . 4. 5 1. 4 7. 3 0.7 3

77. 6

2. 9 82. 2 7. 9 7. 0

«•« • 100. 0 AVERAG E

ppm va s benzen e 2. 1 4. 2 27. 6 40. 2 89. 1 1071. 6 11. 2 3. 8 19. 7 2. 9

1272. 4 ppm

v a s specie s 8. 8 9. 5 43. 1 52. 7 90. 9 1071. 7 11. 2 3. 0 13. 4 1. 7

1306. 0

4. 2 77. 6 8. 4 9. 3

— 99. 5 ppm

v a s benzen e ppm

v a s specie s

7 - POIN

T 1 1 AflUYSI S SUirAW (CONTINUED ) STEA M SUPERHEATE

R OITLE T 2 0 -P.2 0 

# f
RU

N NO
. 1 2 f Specie s Analysi s C- 1 C- 2 C- 3 C- 4 C- 5 C- 6 BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZEN E STYRENE
Tota l Hydrocarbon s By : " specie s summatio n tota l H C analyze r

Inert s an d Flo w Dat a H2O , %b yvol
. N 2 , % b yvol
. O2 , %b yvol
. C0 2 , * b yvol
. H 2 * b vvol.* * 

### LJota l (%) 12- 1 ppm v a s benzen e No t Ru n 1 1
H n
1 1 n 1165. 3 434. 3 2770. 5 494. 4

4864. 5 ppm

v a s specie s

. . .

. . .

. . .

<•> » «

—

— 1165. 3 352. 9 1904. 7 301. 3

3724. 2

0 3. 6 1: 3 8. 6 86. 5 100. 0 12- 2

ppm v a s benzen e 13389. 8 699. 0 332. 9 N.D
. N.D
. 930. 2 1188. 6 310. 2 2014. 5 392. 8

19258. 0 ppm

v a s specie s 56906. 8 1586. 8 519. 4 N.D
. N.D
. 781. 4 1188. 6 252. 1 1385. 0 239. 4 • 62859. 5

0 2. 8 1. 2 13. 8 82. 2 100. 0 1 2

ppm v a s benzen e 18888. 5 425. 0 502. 1 N.D
. N.D
. N.D
. 1183. 2 594. 5 1143. 5 N.D
.
22736. 8 - 3

ppm va s specie s 8027 6 964. 8 783. 3 N.D
. N.D
. N.D
. 1183. 2 48 3 X 786. 1 N.D
.
84476. 4

0 5. 5 1. 9 8. 7 83. 9 100. 0 to- - No t Detecte d
k * differenc e 

# 1 TABL E 2. 8 - POIN T 1 2 ANALYSI S SUMMAR Y- STEA M SUPERHEATE RINLE T 2 1P.2 1

RU N NO . 1 2 | Specie s Analysi s C- 1 C- 2 C- 3 C- 4 C- 5 C- 6 BENZEN E TOLUEN E ETHYLBENZEN E STYREN E
Tota l Hydrocarbon s By : specie s summatio n tota l H C analyze r

Inert s an d Flo w Dat a H2O , %b y vol . N2 , %byvol . O2 , %byvol . 

## i CO2 , %b

yvol . H 2 %b yvoI . * * Tota l {%)

, : D

- - No t Detecte d 12- 4 ppm v a s benzen e 26701. 9 14862. 0 12331. 3 N.D . N.D . 972. 1 1098. 6 . 354. 8 2102. 2 385. 2

58808. 1 ppm

v a s specie s 113483. 1 33736. 7 19236. 8 N.D . N.D . 816. 6 1098. 6 288. 3 1444. 6 234. 7

170339. 4

0 5. 8 2. 6 8. 5 83. 1 100. 0 12- 5

ppm v a s benzen e 14904. 1 770. 8 237. 7 41. 4 273. 2 N.D . 989. 0 378. 4 989. 4 177. 7

.18761. 7 ppm

v a s specie s 63342. 5 1749. 7 370. 9 54. 3 278. 6 N.D . 989. 0 307. 4 680. 2 108. 3

67880. 9

4. 8 <. l 7. 3 87. 8 100. 0 12- 6

ppm v a s benzen e 15317. 4 693. 9 143. 4 25. 3 1425. 0 N.D . 111 0 45 0 90 5 15 5

2022 5 ppm

v a s specie s 65098. 9 1575. 1 223. 8 33. 2 1453. 5 N.D . 111 0 365. 6 622. 2 94. 5

70576. 8

0 3. 8 <. l 7. 2 88. 9 100. 0



### ty differenc e TABL E 2. 8 - POIN T 1 2 ANALYSI S SUMMARY(CONTINUED ) STEA M SUPERHEATE RINLE T
2 2^^^^^^^^^ TM P.2 2 

# f
RU

N NO . 1 2 f Specie s Analysi s ^^C- l "*"~C- 2 

## ^1- 3 '^^C- 4 ""^C- 5 ^^C- 6
^ BENZEN E

" TOLUEN E

' ETHYLBENZEN E

" STYRENE

Total Hydrocarbon s By :

—specie s summatio n tota l H C analyze r

Inert s an d Flo wDat a H 2 0 , %b yvol . N2 , X byvol . 02 , %b yvol . C0 2 , %b yvol . H 2 %b yvol . * * Tota l (% ) 12- 7 ppm v a s benzen e 15087. 6 708. 6 208. 9 32. 2 758. 0 N.D . 1524. 6 710. 0 1482. 6 207. 9

20720. 4 ppm

v a s specie s 64122. 3 1608. 5 325. 9 42. 2 773. 7 N.D . 1524. 6 576. 9 1019. 3 126. 7

70120. 1

0 13. 2 1. 2 7. 1 78. 5 10 0 AVERAG E

ppm v a s benzen e 17381, 6 3026. 6 2292. 7

1179. 9 466.7 1629. 7 302. 2

26274. 4 ppm

v a s specie s 73871. 6 6870. 3 3576. 7

1179. 9 375. 2 1120. 3 184. 2

87178. 2

0 5. 6 1. 2 8. 7 84. 4 10 0 ppm

v a s benzen e ppm

v a s specie s



### No t Detecte d
b 

### * differenc e TABL E 2. 8 - POIN T 1 2 ANALYSI S SUMMARY(CONTINUED ) STEA M SUPERHEATE RINLE T 2 3IN J RU N NO . Stac k Outle t Benzen e Cone , (ppa wet ) Stac k Owge n Cone . (Xv/ v

wet ) Stac k Moistur e (a s analyze d 1 n sanple ) Benzen e Emissio n (pp . » 3 1 0 2 dry ) Fue l Inle t Benzen e Cone , (PPM ) Dilutio nFacto r Benzen e Renova l Efficienc y

(X ) 1

2. 8
B. 6 4. 7
4.4 3 1165. 3 4.0 2 99. 0 2

34. 0 8. 6 4. 7
53.7 7 1188. 6 4.2 6 87. 8 3

11. 9 8. 6 4. 7
18.8 2 1183. 2 4.1 1 95. 9 4

5. 5
8. 6 4. 7
6.9 5 1098. 6 5.2 7 97. 4 5

4. 4
8. 8 4. 7
7.0 8 989. 0 4.0 4 98. 2 6

15. 3 7. 7 4. 7
22.4 2 1110. 0 3.6 8 94. 9 7

4. 5
7. 9 4. 7
6.7 0 1524. 6 3.6 4 98. 9

TABL E 2.9 : SUMMARYO F RESULT S - STEA M SUPERHEATE R