alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                       MPW INDUSTRIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                               JURISDICTION OF
         NAME                                                                                   ORGANIZATION
         ----                                                                                   ------------

<S>                                                                                              <C>
Aquatech Environmental, Inc.                                                                      Michigan
ESI International, Inc.                                                                             Ohio
         ESI North, Limited                                                                         Ohio
MPW Industrial Services, Inc.                                                                       Ohio
         MPW Management Services Corp.                                                              Ohio
                  Maintenance Concepts, Inc.                                                        Ohio
                  MPW Container Management Corp.                                                    Ohio
                  MPW Container Management Corp. of Michigan                                      Michigan
                  MPW Industrial Services, Ltd.                                                    Canada
                  MPW Industrial, Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada de Capital Variable         Mexico
                  Weston Engineering, Inc.                                                          Ohio
                           Gauthier Enterprises, Inc.                                             Michigan
</TABLE>
§ 1630.6 Action on request. ( a ) For TSP records, the record keeper designee, and for non-TSP records, the Privacy Act Officer will answer or acknowledge the inquiry within 10 work days of the date it is received. When the answer cannot be made within 10 work days, the record keeper or Privacy Act Officer will provide the requester with the date when a response may be expected and, whenever possible, the specific reasons for the delay.
( b ) At a minimum, the acknowledgement to a request for access shall include: ( 1 ) When and where the records will be available;
( 2 ) Name, title and telephone number of the official who will make the records available;
( 3 ) Whether access will be granted only by providing a copy of the record through the mail, or only by examination of the record in person if the Privacy Act Officer after consulting with the appropriate system manager has determined the requester's access would not be unduly impeded;
( 4 ) Fee, if any, charged for copies (See § 1630.16); and
( 5 ) If necessary, documentation required to verify the identity of the requester (See § 1630.7).
[55 FR 18852, May 7, 1990, as amended at 67694, 67695, Dec. 3, 1999]
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Conceptus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company)
hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



|(i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 10, 2011



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Gregory E. Lichtwardt                                      
|Gregory E. Lichtwardt                                          
|Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
§ 143.26 Party who may make informal entry of merchandise. ( a ) *Shipments valued between $800 and $2,500.* A shipment of merchandise valued between $800 and $2,500 which qualifies for informal entry under 19 U.S.C. 1498 may be entered, using reasonable care, by the owner or purchaser of the shipment or, when appropriately designated by the owner, purchaser, or consignee of the shipment, a customs broker licensed under 19 U.S.C. 1641.
( b ) *Shipments valued at $800 or less.* A shipment of merchandise valued at $800 or less which qualifies for informal entry under 19 U.S.C. 1498 and meets the requirements in 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2) (see §§ 10.151, 10.152, 10.153, 145.31, 145.32, 148.51, 148.64, of this chapter) may be entered, using reasonable care, by the owner, purchaser, or consignee of the shipment or, when appropriately designated by one of these persons, a customs broker licensed under 19 U.S.C. 1641.
[T.D. 94-51, 59 FR 30296, June 13, 1994, as amended by T.D. 95-31, 60 FR 18991, Apr. 14, 1995; T.D. 98-28, 63 FR 16417, Apr. 3, 1998; CBP Dec. 12-19, 77 FR 72720, Dec. 6, 2012; CBP Dec. No. 16-13, 81 FR 58834, Aug. 26, 2016]
### §75. Conflicting claims upon coal lands; rules and regulations

In case of conflicting claims upon coal lands where the improvements shall be commenced, after the third day of March, 1873, priority of possession and improvement, followed by proper filing and continued good faith, shall determine the preference right to purchase. And also where improvements have already been made prior to the third day of March, 1873, division of the land claimed may be made by legal subdivisions, to include, as near as may be, the valuable improvements of the respective parties. The Director of the Bureau of Land Management is authorized to issue all needful rules and regulations for carrying into effect the provisions of this section and sections 71 to 74 of this title.

(R.S. §2351; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2351 derived from act Mar. 3, 1873, ch. 279, §5, 17 Stat. 608.

#### Transfer of Functi

#### **Executive Documentsons**

"Director of the Bureau of Land Management" substituted in text for "Commissioner of the General Land Office" on authority of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, §403, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

See also note set out under section 1 of this title.

#### Indian Lands Excepted

See note set out under section 71 of this title.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov 

No. III-02-067 December 19, 2002

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC OVERSIGHT PANEL TO MEET WITH FIRSTENERGY IN LISLE, IL, TO DISCUSS

THE SYSTEMS HEALTH ASSURANCE PLAN AT DAVIS-BESSE 

The NRC’s oversight panel, set up to coordinate the agency’s activities associated with the

reactor vessel head degradation at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, will meet with FirstEnergy

officials on Monday, December 23, to discuss the utility’s review of plant safety systems. The plant,

which has been shut down since February 16, is located in Oak Harbor, Ohio.

The meeting will be held at 9 a.m. CST at the NRC’s Region III office, 801 Warrenville Road,

in Lisle, Illinois. Visitors should report first to the Second Floor reception area. The public is invited

to observe the business portion of the meeting and will have an opportunity to make comments and ask

questions of the NRC staff before the meeting is adjourned.

Interested individuals unable to attend may listen to the meeting via telephone by calling: (877)

546-1567 and entering pass code xxx at the prompt. One hundred phone lines will be available. 

Arrangements are also being made to make the meeting available for viewing by video conference at

the NRC’s Headquarters Office, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Room O-3 B4,

Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting will focus on licensee’s proposed actions to address findings identified by the

utility and the NRC in the areas of plant system design and system functionality reviews.

The NRC oversight panel, created on April 29, includes NRC management and staff from its

Region III office in Lisle, Illinois; the NRC Headquarters office in Rockville, Maryland; and the NRC

Resident Inspector Office at the Davis-Besse site.

Documents on the Davis-Besse corrosion issue, including further details on NRC's oversight

panel activities, are posted on the NRC's web site at: http://www.nrc.gov. Select "Davis-Besse" from

the Key Topics menu.

###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-015 January 29, 2004

NRC ISSUES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SAFETY EVALUATION

REPORT ON PROPOSED USEC FACILITY IN OHIO

After careful review and thorough evaluation, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has

concluded that there would be no significant environmental impact from operation of a proposed test

and demonstration “Lead Cascade” gas centrifuge uranium enrichment facility and that the programs

proposed by the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC) would provide adequate safeguards

and protection for the health and safety of workers, the public, and the environment.

The findings are included in two reports, an Environmental Assessment and a Safety Evaluation

Report. The NRC intends to issue a license for the facility, to be located at the Portsmouth Gaseous

Diffusion Plant in Piketon, Ohio, after USEC finalizes a lease arrangement with the U.S. Department

of Energy (DOE), which owns the Portsmouth plant.

USEC applied for a license to build and operate the facility, to be known as the American

Centrifuge Lead Cascade Facility, on February 12, 2003. The Lead Cascade is a test and demonstration

facility based on DOE’s advanced centrifuge technology for enriching uranium for use in producing

fuel for nuclear reactors. The Lead Cascade will consist of up to 240 full-scale centrifuges, which will

recycle the enriched and depleted uranium; the only withdrawals of uranium from the cascade will be

small samples. The facility will be authorized to possess up to 250 kilograms of uranium hexafluoride.

USEC intends to follow the Lead Cascade with a full-scale uranium enrichment plant using

centrifuge technology. On January 12, USEC announced plans to build this centrifuge plant at the

Piketon site.

An announcement of the Environmental Assessment’s availability was published January 27 in

the Federal Register. Both reports will be available through the agency’s ADAMS document

management system on the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html . 

For the Environmental Assessment, use accession number ML040210751. For the Safety Evaluation

Report, use accession number ML040280554. For more information about uranium enrichment, see

the NRC’s fact sheet at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/enrichment.html . 

###
### §1942. Uniform to display United States flag or colors

(a) The uniform of officers and members of the United States Park Police force, the United States Secret Service Uniformed Division, the Capitol Police, and the Metropolitan Police force of the District of Columbia shall bear a distinctive patch, pin, or other emblem depicting the flag of the United States or the colors thereof.

(b) The Secretary of the Interior in the case of the United States Park Police force, the Secretary of the Treasury in the case of the United States Secret Service Uniformed Division, the Capitol Police Board in the case of the Capitol Police, and the Mayor of the District of Columbia in the case of the Metropolitan Police force shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this section.

(Pub. L. 91–297, title II, §201(a), (b), June 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 357; Pub. L. 93–198, title IV, §421, Dec. 24, 1973, 87 Stat. 789; Pub. L. 95–179, Nov. 15, 1977, 91 Stat. 1371.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 210a of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

#### Amendments

1977—Pub. L. 95–179 substituted "United States Secret Service Uniformed Division" for "Executive Protective Service" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Office of Commissioner of District of Columbia, as established by Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1967, abolished as of noon Jan. 2, 1975, by Pub. L. 93–198, title VII, §711, Dec. 24, 1973, 87 Stat. 818, and replaced by office of Mayor of District of Columbia by section 421 of Pub. L. 93–198. Accordingly, "Mayor" substituted in text for "commissioner".
### §39. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 39 was editorially reclassified as section 5306 of this title.
EXHIBIT 21



MPW INDUSTRIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                           |  |                              |  | 
|------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------- |  | 
|NAME                                       |  | JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION |  | 
|Aquatech Environmental, Inc.               |  | Michigan                     |  | 
|                                           |  |                             
|MPW Industrial Cleaning Corp.              |  | Ohio                         |  | 
|                                           |  |                             
|MPW Industrial Services of Indiana, LLC    |  | Indiana                      |  | 
|                                           |  |                             
|MPW Industrial Services, Inc.              |  | Ohio                         |  | 
|                                           |  |                             
|MPW Management Services Corp.              |  | Ohio                         |  | 
|                                           |  |                             
|MPW Container Management Corp.             |  | Ohio                         |  | 
|                                           |  |                             
|MPW Container Management Corp. of Michigan |  | Michigan                     |  | 
|                                           |  |                             
|MPW Industrial Services, Ltd.              |  | Canada                       |  | 
|                                           |  |                             
|MPW Industrial Water Services, Inc.        |  | Ohio                         |  |
### **CHAPTER 67—FEDERAL PAYMENTS**

Sec.
6701.
Payments to local governments.
6702.
Local Government Fiscal Assistance Fund.
6703.
Qualification for payment.
6704.
State area allocations; allocations and payments to territorial governments.
6705.
Local government allocations.
6706.
Income gap multiplier.
6707.
State variation of local government allocations.
6708.
Adjustments of local government allocations.
6709.
Information used in allocation formulas.
6710.
Public participation.
6711.
Prohibited discrimination.
6712.
Discrimination proceedings.
6713.
Suspension and termination of payments in discrimination proceedings.
6714.
Compliance agreements.
6715.
Enforcement by the Attorney General of prohibitions on discrimination.
6716.
Civil action by a person adversely affected.
6717.
Judicial review.
6718.
Investigations and reviews.
6719.
Reports.
6720.
Definitions, application, and administration.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior chapter 67, consisting of sections 6701 to 6724, related to revenue sharing, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–272, title XIV, §14001(a)(1), (e), Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 327, 329, eff. Oct. 18, 1986.
#### Agnes Krull, appellee, v. Eden A. Ross, appellant.

Filed February 28, 1911.

No. 16,240.

1. Landlord and Tenant: Holding Oyer. If a tenant under a written lease for the term of three years holds over 45 days after the expiration of his term without the consent of the landlord, he will not become a tenant from year to year, unless the landlord has recognized him as tenant while so holding over.

2.-: Notice to Quit. The notice to quit prescribed by the statute of forcible entry and detainer is not for the purpose of terminating the tenancy, but is rather preliminary to the action for recovering possession, and is properly given after the right of action has accrued.

Appeal from the district court for Thurston county: Guy T. Graves, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*J. A. Singhaus*and *F. 8. Howell,*for appellant.

*O. G.*Anderson, *H. L. Keefe*and *F. Dolezal, contra.*

Sedgwick, J.

The defendant had possession of the land in question under a lease for a term of three years which ended on the 1st day of January, 1906. He failed to surrender possession of the premises at the end of his term, and in February, following, this action of forcible entry and detainer was begun in the justice court by the landlord to recover possession of the land. The action was appealed to the district court and there tried, and judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

The position of the defendant, as we under stand it in the brief, appears to be that, having held over his term for about 45 days before the notice to quit was served upon him, he must be considered as a tenant from year to year, and that such tenancy cannot be terminated without the six months’ notice. “Where a tenant for a year remains in possession over his term, and is recognized as a *656tenant by the landlord, and no new contract is shown, he becomes a tenant from year to year.” *Montgomery v. Willis,*45 Neb. 434. That is, when a term stipulated in a written lease for a year has ended, and the landlord recognizes him as tenant thereafter by receiving rent or in any other way, showing that both parties regard the relation of landlord and tenant as still continuing, and there is no further agreement as to the terms of the tenancy, defendant is to be considered as holding for another term upon the same conditions as specified in the original lease. In this case the landlord did not recognize him as tenant in any way after the term expired, and there is, of course, no presumption that the parties had agreed that the same relation of landlord and tenant should continue for another year.

The three days’ notice to quit prescribed by the statute of forcible entry and detainer is not required for the purpose of terminating the lease. The lease has already ended by its own terms and would not need any notice to terminate it. This three days’ notice is a part of the proceeding to obtain possession when a tenant is wrongfully holding over after his term has expired. This notice is usually given after the right of action accrues, and three days before the complaint is filed with the justice.

The judgment of the district court is right, and is

Affirmed.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

No. III-00-62 November 21, 2000

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC SURVEY TEAM, MOBILE LABORATORY TO VISIT

SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY NOV. 28-30

**Open for Public Visits on Wednesday, November 29**

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission survey team and its mobile laboratory will be at Southeast

Missouri State University in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, on November 28, 29 and 30 to verify that

radioactive contamination found in one of the university’s buildings has been successfully cleaned up.

The mobile laboratory will be open to visitors from 3 to 5 p.m. CST on Wednesday, November

29, and team members will be available to answer questions on the NRC’s inspection and materials

programs.

NRC inspectors will use direct radiation surveys, contamination surveys, wipe samples, air

samples and other techniques to determine that the contamination has been successfully removed.

As a result of an NRC visit in February, university officials discovered that a radioactive

material - americium-241 - had spilled in the basement of Magill Hall, a science building. The

americium-241 had been placed in storage, and current university officials were unaware the university

still possessed the material.

The NRC in June dispatched an inspection team to the university to gather information on

contamination found in rooms in Magill Hall. The agency on June 22 issued a Confirmatory Action

Letter to the university specifying short and long term actions to be taken by the university to address

the contamination issue. Decontamination began in mid-August, and the university now believes the

building meets NRC criteria for unrestricted use.

NRC inspectors have revisited the site periodically and have been monitoring clean-up

activities.

The mobile laboratory will be parked adjacent to Magill Hall which is located at the north end

of the university’s campus in the science buildings complex.

#####