alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-04-020 April 8, 2004

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC TO DISCUSS ANNUAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

OF OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of AmerGen

Energy Company, LLC, on Thursday, April 15, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual

assessment of safety performance at the Oyster Creek nuclear power plant. The plant is located

in Lacey Township, N.J., and operated by AmerGen.

 The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at

7 p.m. at the Lacey Township Municipal Building, 818 W. Lacey Road in Lacey. Before the

session is adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the public on the

plant’s safety performance, as well as the role of the NRC in ensuring safe operation of the

facility.

 The performance period to be discussed is January 1 to December 31, 2003. In

addition, NRC staff will provide a brief overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process

works.

 A letter sent from the NRC Region I Office to plant officials addresses the performance

of the plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is

available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/oc_2003q4.pdf .

 Overall, the Oyster Creek plant operated safely and met all cornerstone objectives

during the period. (Cornerstones are program areas where NRC measures plant safety

performance.) As a result of a recently finalized “white” inspection finding stemming from an

electrical cable failure at the plant, the NRC will conduct a supplemental inspection to review the

company’s root cause analysis and corrective actions related to the problem. Otherwise, the

NRC plans to perform baseline-level inspections at the facility through Sept. 30, 2005.
 The NRC has closed a previous cross-cutting issue identified in the mid-cycle 2003

letter regarding the plant. The issue was in the area of human performance and involved lapses

in following procedures. While the agency does not plan further reviews in this area, it will

continue to monitor progress through the baseline inspection program.

 With regard to security issues, the NRC has issued several orders and threat advisories

to enhance security capabilities and improve guard force readiness since the terrorist attacks on

September 11, 2001. The agency has also conducted inspections to review the implementation of

these requirements and has monitored the action of plant operators in response to changing threat

conditions. The NRC will continue security inspections during 2004.

 Current performance information for the Oyster Creek plant is available on the NRC

web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/OC/oc_chart.html .

 # # #
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 25, 2023

NO. 03

- 22

- 00178

- CV

Andrew Morris , Appellant

v.

Carrie Cecilia Veilleux , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, KE LLY, AND SMITH AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the divorce dec ree signed by the tr i a l cour t on January 3, 2022

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the portion of the decree regarding the division of property between the parties. Therefore, th e

Court affirms that por tion of the decree. The Court further holds that there was revers ible error

in the portion of the decree a ward in g appellate at torneys ’ fees to appellee

. Therefore, the C ourt

vacates t hat portion of the trial court’s decree

. Each party s hall pay the cost s of appeal incurred

by that party, both in this Court and in the court below

.
Order entered September 19, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00378-CV

TODD PRUETT, Appellant

V.

MARK STOLZ, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-07463

ORDER

We DENY appellant’s September 13, 2013 motion requesting the Court to stop posting 

documents and information on our website.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS 

JUSTICE
### §74d. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 74d was editorially reclassified as section 5621 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Positions in Corrections Calendar Office

Pub. L. 108–83, title I, §106, Sept. 30, 2003, 117 Stat. 1018, which related to the transfer of positions in the Corrections Calendar Office, was editorially reclassified as section 5624 of this title.
#### § 1650.23 Accounts of less than $200.

Upon receiving information from the employing agency that a participant has been separated for more than 60 days and that any outstanding loans have been closed, provided the participant has not made a distribution election before the distribution is processed, if the account balance is $5.00 or more but less than $200, the TSP record keeper will automatically distribute the entire amount of his or her account balance. The TSP record keeper will not pay this amount by EFT. The participant may not elect to leave this amount in the TSP, nor will the TSP record keeper roll over any automatically distributed amount to an eligible employer plan, traditional IRA, or Roth IRA. However, the participant may make an indirect rollover of this payment into an eligible employer plan, traditional IRA, or Roth IRA to the extent the roll over is permitted by the Internal Revenue Code.
### §711. General authority

The Comptroller General may—

(1) prescribe regulations to carry out the duties and powers of the Comptroller General;

(2) delegate the duties and powers of the Comptroller General to officers and employees of the Government Accountability Office as the Comptroller General decides is necessary to carry out those duties and powers;

(3) regulate the practice of representatives of persons before the Office; and

(4) administer oaths to witnesses when auditing and settling accounts.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 889; Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 711 | 31:44(1st sentence). | June 10, 1921, ch. 18, §304(1st par. 1st sentence), 42 Stat. 24. |
| | 31:52(c), (d). | June 10, 1921, ch. 18, §311(c), (d), 42 Stat. 25; Feb. 15, 1980, Pub. L. 96–191, §8(e)(4), 94 Stat. 33. |
| | 31:52–1(related to direct). | Feb. 15, 1980, Pub. L. 96–191, §2(related to direct), 94 Stat. 27. |
| | 31:117. | R.S. §297. |

In clause (1), the words "may . . . prescribe regulations to carry out the duties and powers of the Comptroller General" are substituted for "shall make such rules and regulations as may be necessary for carrying on the work of the General Accounting Office" in 31:52(d) for consistency.

In clause (2), the word "delegate" is substituted for "direct" in 31:52–1, and the words "officers and employees" are substituted for "personnel", and 31:52(c) is omitted, for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.

In clause (3), the words "rules and" in 31:52(d) are omitted as surplus. The words "representatives of persons" are substituted for "attorneys" for clarity and consistency in the revised title.

In clause (4), the words "in any case in which they may deem it necessary for the due" in 31:117 are omitted as surplus. The words "auditing and settling" are substituted for "examination" for consistency. The words "with which they shall be charged" are omitted because of the restatement.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Par. (2). Pub. L. 108–271 substituted "Government Accountability Office" for "General Accounting Office".

#### Expired Appropriations Available for Deposit Into Employees' Compensation Fund

Pub. L. 113–6, div. F, title VI, §1611, Mar. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 427, provided that:

"(a) In General.—Available balances of expired Government Accountability Office appropriations shall be available to the Government Accountability Office to make the deposit to the credit of the Employees' Compensation Fund required by section 8147(b) of title 5[,] United States Code.

"(b) Effective Date.—This section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2013 and each fiscal year thereafter."
#### § 358.102 Definitions.

For purposes of this part:

*Act* means the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

*CBP* means the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection of the United States Department of Homeland Security.

*Department* means the United States Department of Commerce.

*Order* means an order issued by the Secretary under section 303, section 706, or section 736 of the Act.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of Commerce or a designee.

*Supplies for use in emergency relief work* means food, clothing, and medical, surgical, and other supplies for use in emergency relief work.
#### Mary Elizabeth BOONE, Appellant, v. John D. ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Appellee.

No. 01-5014.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

March 11, 2002.

Before GINSBURG, Chief Judge, HENDERSON, and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed November 8, 2000, be affirmed. Mary Boone’s asthma, when treated, “substantially limits” neither her ability to breathe nor any other “major life activity.” *Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.,*527 U.S. 471, 482, 119 S.Ct. 2139, 144 L.Ed.2d 450 (1999). Boone’s own testimony confirms that she is in excellent health and successfully controls her asthma with medication. As the district court indicated, the record supplies no reason to believe that the Federal Bureau of Investigation perceived Boone’s asthma as substantially limiting any of her major life activities. *See Boone v. Reno,*121 F.Supp.2d 109, 112-13 & n. 2 (D.D.C.2000).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Exhibit 32


                                 CERTIFICATION

     By  signing  below,  each  of the  undersigned  officers  hereby  certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge, (i) this report fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the  information  contained in this report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of Union Community Bancorp.

Signed this  29th day of March, 2005.



/s/ J. Lee Walden                       /s/ Alan L. Grimble
--------------------------------        ----------------------------------------
J. Lee Walden                           Alan L. Grimble
Chief Financial Officer                 Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
333-121865, 333-109817 and 333-98405 on Forms S-8 of our report relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company
Limited and subsidiaries (the "Company") and the effectiveness of the Company's
internal control over financial reporting dated March 30, 2008 (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to
the reconciliation to accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America and the convenience translation of New Taiwan dollar amounts
into U.S. dollar amounts), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2007.





/s/ Deloitte & Touche
Deloitte & Touche
Taipei, Taiwan
The Republic of China

April 14, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,177
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,617
<INVENTORY>                                     78,162
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               176,823
<PP&E>                                         153,008
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,768
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 340,373
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,211
<BONDS>                                        113,410
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                     160,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   340,373
<SALES>                                        728,065
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               728,065
<CGS>                                          559,655
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  705,590
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,666
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,198
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,493
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,493
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.78


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GATEWAY,
INC.'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,014,473
<SECURITIES>                                   200,552
<RECEIVABLES>                                  730,112
<ALLOWANCES>                                    21,535
<INVENTORY>                                    172,042
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,573,416
<PP&E>                                       1,003,110
<DEPRECIATION>                                 320,596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,448,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,668,932
<BONDS>                                          3,097
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,147
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,651,381
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,448,482
<SALES>                                      6,194,016
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,194,016
<CGS>                                        4,842,077
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,842,077
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                17,617
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 726
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                471,805
<INCOME-TAX>                                   169,850
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            301,955
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   301,955
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.94


</TABLE>
### §906. Requests for funding assistance

A Governor of a State may request funding assistance for the homeland defense activities of the National Guard of that State from the Secretary of Defense. Any such request shall include the following:

(1) The specific intended homeland defense activities of the National Guard of that State.

(2) An explanation of why participation of National Guard units or members, as the case may be, in the homeland defense activities is necessary and appropriate.

(3) A certification that homeland defense activities are to be conducted at a time when the personnel involved are not in Federal service.

(Added Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title V, §512(a)(1), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1879.)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Deschutes Advisory Committee will meet on November 9, 2004, starting at 9 a.m. at the Jefferson County Firehall on the corner of Adam and “J” Street in Madras, Oregon. Agenda items will include approval of this year's Northwest Forest Plan Monitoring report, Understanding Landscape Processes in Central Oregon, Local Community Protection Plans, B and B Project Update, and a discussion on upcoming topics and meeting dates. All Deschutes Province Advisory Committee Meetings are open to the public and an open public forum is scheduled from 2:30 to 3 p.m.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Chris Mickle, Province Liaison, Deschutes NF, Crescent RD, P.O. Box 208, Crescent, OR 97754, phone (541) 433-3216.

Leslie A.C. Weldon,

Deschutes National Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 04-24316  Filed 10-29-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 1 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 2 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 3 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 4 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 5 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 6 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 7 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 8 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 9 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 10 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 11 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 12 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 13 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 14 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 15 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 16 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 17 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 18 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 19 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 20 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 21 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 22 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 23 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 24 of 25
Case 9:20-cv-81304-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 25 of 25
#### § 212.24 Settlement.

The applicant and the Commission may agree on a proposed settlement of the award before final action on the application, either in connection with a settlement of the underlying adversary adjudication, or after the underlying adversary adjudication has been concluded. If a prevailing party and the Commission investigative attorney agree on a proposed settlement of an award before an application has been filed, the application shall be filed with the proposed settlement.