alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001047334
<NAME> NATIONAL HEALTH REALTY, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,229,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               94,439,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     144,615,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             242,495,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 131,616,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               242,495,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 146.62 Entry. ( a ) *General.* Entry for foreign merchandise that is to be transferred from a zone, or removed from a zone for exportation or transportation to another port, for consumption or warehouse, will be made by filing an in-bond application pursuant to part 18 of this chapter, CBP Form 3461, CBP Form 7501, or other applicable CBP forms. If entry is made on CBP Form 3461, the person making entry shall file an entry summary for all the merchandise covered by the CBP Form 3461 within 10 business days after the time of entry.
( b ) *Documentation.* ( 1 ) Customs Form 7501, or its electronic equivalent, or the entry summary will be accompanied by the entry documentation, including invoices as provided in parts 141 and 142 of this chapter. The person with the right to make entry shall submit any other supporting documents required by law or regulations that relate to the transferred merchandise and provide the information necessary to support the admissibility, the declared values, quantity, and classification of the merchandise. If the declared values are predicated on estimates or estimated costs, that information must be clearly stated in writing at the time an entry or entry summary is filed.
( 2 ) An in-bond application for merchandise to be transferred to another port or zone or for exportation must provide that the merchandise covered is foreign trade zone merchandise; give the number of the zone from which the merchandise was transferred; state the status of the merchandise; and, if applicable, bear the notation or endorsement provided for in § 146.64(c), § 146.66(b), or § 146.70(c).
( c ) *Waiver of supporting documents.* The port director may waive presentation of an invoice and supporting documentation required in paragraph (b) of this section with the entry or entry summary, if satisfied that presentation of those documents would be impractical, and the person making entry or the operator either files invoices and supporting documentation with the port director or maintains and makes those records available for examination by Customs.
[T.D. 86-16, 51 FR 5049, Feb. 11, 1986, as amended by CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61291, Oct. 13, 2015; CBP Dec. 17-13, 82 FR 45407, Sept. 28, 2017]
### §1243. Interagency cooperation

All departments, boards, commissioners, and agencies of the United States of America shall cooperate with the Secretary by providing technical expertise, personnel, equipment, materials, and supplies to implement and administer the provisions of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 95–87, title IV, §414, formerly §413, Aug. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 467, renumbered §414, Pub. L. 101–508, title VI, §6010(1), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–296.)
### SUBCHAPTER II—APPORTIONMENT
Exhibit 10.33



February 6, 2002



Addendum to Employment Contract between Nick Evans-Lombe & Getty Images dated February 6, 2002.



It is agreed that in addition to the contract provisions, Nick shall receive the following pre-requisites, while employed by Getty Images:



| |  |  | Accomodation Allowance not to exceed $60,000 per annum.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Airline ticket Allowance not to exceed $4,700 per annum.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Reimbursement for 2 leased automobiles through December 31, 2002, then reimbursement for 1 leased automobile through June 1, 2004.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | UK Pension Allowance of $16,450 per annum.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum effective as of the day and year first written above.



GETTY IMAGES, INC.By:

/s/ JEFF BEYLEName:

Jeff BeyleTitle:

SVP, General CounselEMPLOYEEBy:

/s/ NICK EVANS-LOMBENick Evans-Lombe
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JASON EUGENE DANIELS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-5088

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed August 31, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Wayne M. Durden, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Kevin E. Leisure, Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Michael Schaub, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
§ 185.114 Parties to the hearing. ( a ) The parties to the hearing shall be the defendant and OPM.
( b ) Except where the authority head designates another, OPM shall be represented by the members of the Office of the General Counsel.
( c ) Pursuant to section 3730(c)(5) of title 31, United States Code, a private plaintiff under the False Claims Act may participate in these proceedings to the extent authorized by the provisions of that Act.
#### § 2416.110 Notice.

The agency shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this regulation and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the agency, and make such information available to them in such manner as the head of the agency finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and this regulation.

[53 FR 25881, 25885, July 8, 1988. Redesignated at 75 FR 48273, Aug. 10, 2010]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64039-64040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24472]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE


Office of the Secretary; Membership of the Office of the 
Secretary of Defense; Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces the appointment of the members of the 
Performance Review Board (PRB) of the Office of the Secretary of 
Defense, the Joint staff, the U.S. Mission to the North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization, the Defense Advance Research Projects Agency, the Defense 
Commissary Agency, the Defense Security Service, the Defense Security 
Assistance Agency, the Missile Defense Agency, the Defense Field 
Activities and the U.S. Court of Appeals of the Armed Forces. The 
publication of PRB membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).
    The Performance Review Board (PRB) provides fair and impartial 
review of Senior Executive Service performance appraisals and makes 
recommendations regarding performance ratings and performance awards to 
the Secretary of Defense.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Burrell, Executive and 
Political Personnel Division, Directorate for Personnel and Security, 
Washington Headquarters Services, Office of the Secretary of Defense, 
Department of Defense, The Pentagon, (703) 693-8347.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the 
following executives are appointed to the office of the Secretary of 
Defense PRB: specific PRB panel assignments will be made from this 
group. Executives listed will serve a one-year

[[Page 64040]]

renewable term, effective October 1, 2004.

Office of the Secretary of Defense

Chairperson
Jennifer Buck
Bruce Bade
Michael Ioffredo
Robert Leheny
Eric Coulter
Get Moy
Robert Nemetz
George Lotz
Rebecca Schmidt
Joel Sitrin
Paul Koffsky
Richard Burke
Norma St. Claire
William Lowry
Robert Bruce
James Johnson
Cheryl Roby
Kathie Johnson
Mark Schaeffer
James Townsend
Ann Reese
Richard Sylvester
Robert Foster
Alan Shaffer
Margaret Myers
Gary Payton
Ellen Embrey
James J. Townsend
William Lehr
Richard Millies
Sallie Flavin

    Dated: October 28, 2004.
Jeannette Owings-Ballard,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-24472 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### § 4.4 Panama Canal; report of arrival required.

Vessels which merely transit the Panama Canal without transacting any business there shall be required to report their arrival because of such transit. The report of arrival shall be made in accordance with § 4.2(a).

[T.D. 79-276, 44 FR 61956, Oct. 29, 1979]
### §68a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 68a was editorially reclassified as section 6510 of this title.
### §1906. Incidents involving ships

#### (a) Requirement to report incident

The master, person in charge, owner, charterer, manager, or operator of a ship involved in an incident shall report the incident in the manner prescribed by Article 8 of the Convention in accordance with regulations promulgated by the Secretary for that purpose.

#### (b) Requirement to report discharge, probable discharge, or presence of oil

The master or person in charge of—

(1) a ship of United States registry or nationality, or operated under the authority of the United States, wherever located;

(2) another ship while in the navigable waters of the United States; or

(3) a sea port or oil handling facility subject to the jurisdiction of the United States,

shall report a discharge, probable discharge, or presence of oil in the manner prescribed by Article 4 of the International Convention on Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response and Cooperation, 1990 (adopted at London, November 30, 1990), in accordance with regulations promulgated by the Secretary for that purpose.

(Pub. L. 96–478, §7, Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2300; Pub. L. 102–241, §39, Dec. 19, 1991, 105 Stat. 2225.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–241 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows:

"(a) As soon as he has knowledge of an incident, the master or other person in charge of a ship shall report it to the Secretary in the manner prescribed by Article 8 of the Convention.

"(b) Upon receipt of the report of an incident involving a ship, other than one of United States registry or nationality or one operated under the authority of the United States, the Secretary shall take the action required by Article 8 of the Convention."
#### § 2412.3 Notice and publication.

The Authority, the General Counsel, the IG, and the Panel will publish in the Federal Register such notices describing systems of records as are required by law.
#### Charles A. Greve and Agnes R. Greve, Appellants, v. Fred Graf, Respondent.

Motion granted, without costs, without prejudice to an application to be made to this court for leave to file the exceptions *nunc pro tunc.*Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
§ 210.11 Service of complaint and notice of investigation. ( a ) ( 1 ) Unless the Commission institutes temporary relief proceedings, upon institution of an investigation, the Commission shall serve: ( i ) Copies of the nonconfidential version of the complaint, the nonconfidential exhibits, and the notice of investigation upon each respondent; and
( ii ) Copies of the nonconfidential version of the complaint and the notice of investigation upon the embassy in Washington, DC of the country in which each proposed respondent is located as indicated in the Complaint.
( 2 ) If the Commission institutes temporary relief proceedings, upon institution of an investigation, the Commission shall serve: ( i ) Copies of the nonconfidential version of the motion for temporary relief, the nonconfidential version of the complaint, and the notice of investigation upon each respondent; and
( ii ) A copy of the notice of investigation upon the embassy in Washington, DC of the country in which each proposed respondent is located as indicated in the Complaint.
( 3 ) All respondents named after an investigation has been instituted and the governments of the foreign countries in which they are located as indicated in the complaint shall be served as soon as possible after the respondents are named.
( 4 ) The Commission shall serve copies of the notice of investigation upon the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the U.S. Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, the U.S. Customs Service, and such other agencies and departments as the Commission considers appropriate.
( b ) With leave from the presiding administrative law judge, a complainant may attempt to effect personal service of the complaint and notice of investigation upon a respondent, if the Secretary's efforts to serve the respondent have been unsuccessful. If the complainant succeeds in serving the respondent by personal service, the complainant must notify the administrative law judge and file proof of such service with the Secretary.
[73 FR 38321, July 7, 2008, as amended at 83 FR 21160, May 8, 2018]
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-04-002 January 8, 2004

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: opa2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

ORAL ARGUMENT ON DUKE’S APPLICATION TO USE MIXED OXIDE

NUCLEAR FUEL SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 15 IN CHARLOTTE

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will hear oral argument

Thursday, January 15, on supplemental contentions raised by the Blue Ridge Environmental Defense

League in the proceeding involving Duke Energy’s application to use mixed oxide, or MOX, test

assemblies at the Catawba Nuclear Station near Rock Hill, SC. The proceeding will be held in

Courtroom 2 of the U.S. Courthouse, 401 W. Trade Street in Charlotte, beginning at 9:00 a.m.

The three-member Licensing Board is chaired by Administrative Judge Ann Marshall Young

and also includes Administrative Judges Anthony J. Baratta and Dr. Thomas S. Elleman. During the

session in Charlotte, which will be open to public observation, the panel will hear argument on the

contentions but no decision on the admissibility of those contentions will be made until later. 

In February 2003, Duke Energy filed an application to amend the operating license at Catawba

to allow the use of four MOX test assemblies at the plant. The NRC technical staff is currently

reviewing that application. After a July 2003 Federal Register notice on the Duke application, the

Nuclear Information and Resource Service and Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League filed to

intervene and requested a hearing. 

MOX fuel would be produced by combining surplus plutonium from dismantled nuclear

weapons with uranium into a form that can be used by nuclear power plants. A planned MOX

fabrication facility, which would be U.S. Government-owned and located at the Department of

Energy’s Savannah River Site in South Carolina, would also be subject to NRC requirements. 

 ###
#### § 1651.12 Homicide.

If the participant's death is the result of a homicide, a beneficiary will not be paid as long as the beneficiary is under investigation by local, state or Federal law enforcement authorities as a suspect. If the beneficiary is implicated in the death of the participant and the beneficiary would be precluded from inheriting under state law, the beneficiary will not be entitled to receive any portion of the participant's account. The TSP record keeper will follow the state law of the participant's domicile as that law is set forth in a civil court judgment (that, under the law of the state, would protect the TSP record keeper from double liability or payment) or, in the absence of such a judgment, will apply state law to the facts after all criminal appeals are exhausted. The TSP record keeper will treat the beneficiary as if he or she predeceased the participant and the account will be paid in accordance with § 1651.10.

[62 FR 32429, June 13, 1997, as amended at 75 FR 44066, July 28, 2010; 87 FR 31686, May 24, 2022]
§ 4.99 Forms; substitution. ( a ) Customs Forms 1300, 1302, 1302-A, 1303, and 1304 printed by private parties or foreign governments shall be accepted provided the forms so printed: ( 1 ) Conform to the official Customs forms in wording arrangement, style, size of type, and paper specifications;
( 2 ) Conform to the official Customs forms in size, except that: ( i ) Each form may be printed on metric A4 size paper, 210 by 297 millimeters (approximately 81 ⁄ 4 by 112 ⁄ 3 inches).
( ii ) The vertical format of Customs Forms 1300, 1302-A, 1303, and 1304 may be increased in size up to a maximum of 14 inches.
( iii ) Customs Form 1302 may be reduced in size to not less than either 81 ⁄ 2 by 11 inches or 210 by 297 millimeters (metric A4 size). If Customs Form 1302 is reduced in size, the size of type used may be reduced proportionately.
( b ) If instructions are printed on the reverse side of the official Customs form, the instructions may be omitted from the privately printed forms, but the instructions shall be followed.
( c ) The port director, in his discretion, may accept a computer printout instead of Customs Form 1302 for use at a specific port. However, to ensure that computer printouts may be used at all ports, the private party or foreign government first must obtain specific approval from Headquarters, U.S. Customs Service.
( d ) Forms which do not comply with the requirements of this section are not acceptable without the specific approval of the Commissioner of Customs.
[T.D. 79-255, 44 FR 57088, Oct. 4, 1979; T.D. 00-22, 65 FR 16517, Mar. 29, 2000]
<Page>

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective
Amendment No. 7 to the registration statement on Form N-4 (No. 333-79701) of our
report dated February 15, 2002, relating to the financial statements of Fortis
Benefits Insurance Company, which appears in the Statement of Additional
Information constituting part of Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to such
registration statement. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our
report dated April 6, 2001, relating to the financial statements of Fortis
Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account D, which appears in such Statement
of Additional Information. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Independent Public Accountants" in such Statement of Additional
Information.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 21, 2003
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Frank M. Banikowski, Appellant, against American Locomotive Company et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Early in 1948, in the course of his employment with American Locomotive Company, self-insured employer, claimant used carbon tetrachloride in cleaning machinery. The exposure to the chemical resulted in facial swelling, inflammation and conjunctivitis of the eyes and dermatitis. He claims that subsequent to April 4, 1949, he suffered disability from the effects of carbon tetrachloride poisoning, an occupational disease. The Workmen’s Compensation Board has found the 1948 conditions to have been temporary only and to have cleared long before April, 1949; further, that there was no relationship between that temporary condition and the claimed disability of 1949. Claimant has appealed to this court from the board’s decision. The record presented a question of fact as to the relationship of the alleged disability in 1949 and the results of his 1948 exposure. There was substantial medical evidence to support the board’s findings. Decision of the Workmen's Compensation Board unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Walter C. Kelczewski, Appellant.

Defendant was indicted by a grand jury, Schenectady County, for assault in the third degree. On plea of guilty the Schenectady County Court pronounced sentence that he be confined in the New York State Reformatory at Elmira, New York, under provisions of the law applicable thereto. This sentence was in excess of the powers of the court, and is reversed on the law and facts. He may not be sentenced to more than one year in the Schenectady County jail and fined under the provisions of the statute. The judgment and sentence of this court is that the defendant-appellant be confined in Schenectady County jail for a term of three months; further defendant-appellant is to pay a fine of $500 and in the event of failure to pay the fine that he be confined in the Schenectady County jail one day for each dollar of the fine unpaid. The sentence as to the payment of the fine and service of time upon" failure to pay is suspended during defendant-appellant’s *831good behavior. A further and absolute condition of the suspension of the $500 fine is that he indulge in no alcoholic drinks of any kind. After discharge, following the time to be served, defendant-appellant is required to report to the probation officer of Schenectady County every two weeks, and that officer in the event of delinquency will report to Mr. John S. Herrick, the clerk of this court. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Foster, Russell and Deyo, JJ., concur.
### §2290. Flood control in Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

The Secretary is authorized to use the authority contained in section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), section 2 of the Flood Control Act of August 28, 1937 (33 U.S.C. 701g), section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), section 3 of the Act entitled "An Act authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting the shores of publicly owned property", approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g), and section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i) in the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.

(Pub. L. 99–662, title IX, §915(h), Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4191.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

For termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, see note set out preceding section 1681 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.