alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 30045 Su m m ar yC al endar CA RL OS S EMEDO , Pet i t i o ne r - Appe l l ant v. ERI C H OLD ER, J R. , U. S. ATTORN EY GE N ERA L; M I C H AEL CH ERTO FF; M IC H A E L G A R C IA ; C H R IS T IN E D AV IS ; G E O R G E L U R D , II I; J P Y O U N G , R espon den t s- A pp el l ees A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he W es t er n D i st r i c tof Loui si ana U SD C N o. 2: 08- C V - 886 B ef ore R E AV L E Y , D AV IS, an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * A f t er t h e B oard of

I m m i grati on A pp eal s ( B IA) af f i rm e d a n order of r e m o va la ga i ns tCar l o s Se m e do , he f i l e d ape t i t i o n fo rre vi e w w i t h t hi s c o ur ta nd w e o r d e r e das ta yo f r e m o v a l. S em edo v. Hol d er, N o. 08- 60150 ( 5t h C i r . M ar . 5, 2 0 0 8 ) . W h i l e h i s p e t i t i o n fo rr e v i e w wa s p e n d i n g , S e m e d o f i l e da2 8 U. S . C. § 2 24 1 pe t i t i o n i n t he di s t r i c t c o ur t c hal l e ngi ng hi s c o nt i nue d d e t e nt i o n. Se m e do no w a ppe al s t he di s t r i c tc o ur t ’ s de ni alo f hi s § 2 24 1 pe t i t i o n. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Februar y 23, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk Case: 09-30045 Document: 00511033201 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/23/2010N o. 09- 30045

2 W e n ee dto sa y n o m ore ab ou t t h e a p p l i ca ti on of 8 U . S . C . § 12 3 1 , tha n to s a yth a t t h e G o v e r n m e n t c a n n o t b e fa u lte dfo rd e la y in gd e p o r ta tio n w h ile Sem edo i s pro se c ut i ng a habeas c as e i n fede r al c our t . The G ove r nm entnow s ays t he de t e nt i o n wi l le nd wi t h hi s de po r t at i o n when this ca s e e nds . I tno w e nds a n dthe com p l a i n t w i l lsh ortly be m oo t. AF F I RMED. Case: 09-30045 Document: 00511033201 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/23/2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3642]

In accordance with a notice received from the Department of Homeland Security—Federal Emergency Management Agency—effective October 26, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to include Botetourt County as a disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms and flooding from the remnants of Hurricane Jeanne occurring on September 27, 2004, and continuing. All other counties contiguous to the above named primary county have previously been declared.

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.*, the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is December 17, 2004, and for economic injury the deadline is July 18, 2005.                

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008.)

Dated: October 27, 2004.

Herbert L. Mitchell,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 04-24369 Filed 11-1-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32(b)


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of United Rentals, Inc. and United Rentals (North America), Inc. (the “Companies”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, William B. Plummer, Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


|   |                                                                                                                                                  
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

|   |                                                                                                                                                       
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.

January 24, 2012





/s/    WILLIAMB. PLUMMERWilliam B. PlummerChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the Registrant's unaudited interim financial
statements for the quarter ended September 30, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to those financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000895993
<NAME> RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST II
       
<S>     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      1,800
<SECURITIES>                           16,116,582<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,800
<PP&E>                                    331,018<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         16,473,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      90,557
<BONDS>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                             16,382,647<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           16,473,204
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        1,755,807
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          259,217
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         1,496,590
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     1,496,590
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                            1,496,590
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            6358.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                            6358.25

<FN>
<F1>Investments in power project partnerships.
<F2>Equipment in storage.
<F3>Represents Investor Shares of beneficial interest in
Trust with capital accounts of $16,419,964 less managing
shareholder's accumulated deficit of $37,317.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 03-161 December 11, 2003

 NRC ANNOUNCES OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING ON APPLICATION

 TO RENEW D.C. COOK, UNITS 1 AND 2, OPERATING LICENSES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has announced the opportunity to request a

hearing on an application from Indiana Michigan Power Company to renew the operating licenses for

Units 1 and 2 of the D.C. Cook nuclear power plant for an additional 20 years beyond the period

specified in the current license. 

D.C. Cook is located near Benton Harbor, Michigan, and the current operating licenses for the

plant’s Unit 1 and Unit 2, expire on October 25, 2014, and December 23, 2017, respectively. 

The deadline for requesting participation in the hearing is January 9 (30 days after publication

of a Federal Register Notice, on December 10). By that date, petitions must be filed by anyone whose

interest may be affected by the license renewal, and who wishes to participate as a party in the

proceeding. Petitions for a hearing must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications

Staff. They may also be delivered to the NRC Public Document Room at 11555 Rockville Pike,

Rockville, Maryland.

Copies of the petition should also be sent to:

-- Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

20555-0001, and by fax (301-415-3725) or e-mail, OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov ; 

-- Secretary of the Commission by fax (301-415-1101) or e-mail to hearingdocket@nrc.gov 

and

-- Mano K. Nazar, Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Indiana Michigan Power

Company, Nuclear Generation Group, One Cook Place, Bridgman, MI 49016. 

Additional information about the opportunity for a hearing may be found in the Federal

Register Notice. A copy of the license renewal application is available on the NRC web site at this

address: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/cook.html . The

document is also available for inspection at the NRC’s Public Document Room in Rockville,

Maryland, and at the Bridgman Public Library in Bridgman, Michigan, and the Maud Preston

Palenske Memorial Library in St. Joseph, Michigan. 
-2-

NRC staff have determined that Indiana Michigan Power has submitted sufficient 

information for the agency to formally “docket,” or file, the application. Docketing the application

does not preclude requesting additional information as the review proceeds, nor does it indicate

whether the Commission will grant or deny the application.

For further information, contact Johnny Eads, License Renewal Project Manager, Division of

Regulatory Improvement Programs, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Mail Stop O11-F1, Washington, DC 20555; telephone 301-415-1471.

###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-038 March 31, 2004

 NRC MAKES NEW MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENTS TO EXPAND 

 ITS FOCUS ON SAFETY, SECURITY, AND PREPAREDNESS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has made a number of new management

assignments to better focus the agency on safety, security, and preparedness, and to position it

for future change while continuing to protect public health and safety. The changes are

intended to bring fresh perspectives on key issues and cross-fertilization of management ideas

as the agency moves forward. 

In an announcement to all NRC employees today, Chairman Nils J. Diaz said, “During

the last 2 1⁄2 years, the NRC has faced multiple challenges in every area of its responsibilities. 

The agency has turned most of these challenges into opportunities to do what is right.

However, it is clear that the NRC is no longer a safety agency, but a safety, security, and

preparedness agency. To address these challenges and opportunities, and to move succession

planning into one of our priority areas, a series of senior management assignments are going to

be effected. These changes are being done with the approval of, or in consultation with, the

Commission.”

The new assignments are: 

Executive Director for Operations, William D. Travers, will become Region II Administrator. 

Region II Administrator, Luis A. Reyes, will become Executive Director for Operations.

Deputy Executive Director for Reactor Programs, Samuel J. Collins, will replace Region I

Administrator Hubert J. Miller upon his retirement in June.

Chief Information Officer, Ellis W. Merschoff, will become Deputy Executive Director for

Reactor Programs.
Deputy Chief Information Officer, Jacqueline E. Silber, will become Chief Information

Officer, pending approval by the Office of Management and Budget.

Deputy Executive Director for Materials, Research, and State Programs, Carl J. Paperiello, will

become Director of the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. 

Director of the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Ashok C. Thadani, will become

Director for International Research and Development Projects.

Director of the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Martin J.Virgilio, will

become Deputy Executive Director for Materials, Research and State Programs.

Deputy Director of the Office of Regulatory Research, Jack R. Strosnider, will become

Director of the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.

Associate Director in the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, John W. Craig, will become 

the Deputy Director of the Office of Regulatory Research.

These changes will become effective in phases, but as soon as practical. 

 ###
#### In the Matter of Tennyson Brown, Respondent, against Maurice Finkelstein et al., Constituting the Temporary City Housing Rent Commission of the *773City of New York, Appellants.

In April of 1946, one Jones, a veteran, acquired title to the premises, a two-family house, by purchase, in connection with which he obtained a veteran’s loan under title III of the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944 (U. S. Code, tit. 38, § 694 *et seq.).*The price was $6,500 and he paid $500 in cash to the seller. About two years later, on April 19, 1948, he conveyed an undivided half interest to his brother-in-law, the respondent Brown, as tenant in common. The latter and his family have been living in the apartment of Jones, in this house, since November of 1946. Brown, claiming to have been an equal purchaser with Jones at the time the latter took title in 1946, and that the 1948 deed to himself was in pursuance of a written agreement between J ones and himself, executed, and acknowledged as for recording, on May 3, 1946, under which he obligated himself to pay half the principal payments upon the mortgage and half the carrying expenses and charges, seeks the certificate for the eviction of a tenant who occupies the other apartment. Since only $500 was paid in cash upon the sale, it has not been established that at least 20% of the purchase price under the sale has been paid to the seller, which is prerequisite to the issuance of a certificate. (Administrative Code of the City of New York, § U41-7.0, subd. i.) Payments on account of the mortgage and other expenses and charges, made subsequent to the time of the purchase, and not paid to the seller, may not be considered as part of such required cash payment to the seller. Although respondent may have undertaken, by the agreement of May 3, 1946, to contribute to the repayment of the servicemen’s loan to Jones, he was not thereby transmuted to the status of a purchaser *“*who has obtained ” such loan and therefore is not entitled to the exemption, under paragraph (2) of subdivision i of the cited statute, from the minimum cash requirement. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur. [193 Misc. 311.] [See *post,*p. 835.]
No. 98-20705 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20705 Summary Calendar

BLAKE FLORIN HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GLENDA ADAMS; MICHAEL WARREN; HERMAN E. SCHAFFER; J.D. WILLIAMS, JR., Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CV-3081

-------------------- March 1, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Blake Florin Harris (“Harris”) filed a pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging that Glenda Adams (“Dr. Adams”), Eastern Regional Medical Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (“TDCJ”), Michael Warren (“Dr. Warren”), Deputy Director for Health Services of the TDCJ, Herman Schaffer (“Dr. Schaffer”), and J. D. Williams, Jr. (“Dr. Williams”) violated his constitutional rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Following a hearing pursuant to Cay v. Estelle , 789 F.2d 318 (5thNo. 98-20705 -2- Cir. 1986), and Spears v. McCotter , 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985), the district court dismissed Harris’ action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). We have reviewed the briefs and the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See Black v. Warren , 134 F.3d 732, 733-34 (5th Cir. 1998). The district court’s decision is AFFIRMED, and Harris’ motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED.
AFFIRMED. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR MOTOR CARGO INDUSTRIES, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,515
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,824
<ALLOWANCES>                                       641
<INVENTORY>                                        460
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,775
<PP&E>                                          85,954
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,560
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,660
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,741
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,135
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,139
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,660
<SALES>                                        114,725
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,725
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,449
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,660
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,789
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,789
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .83
        

</TABLE>
#### Samuel Schwartz, Respondent, v. J. Willett Fox and Susan Fox, Appellants, Impleaded with Another, Defendant.

Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers affirmed by default, with costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
§ 1205.21 Request for amendment. A request for amendment of a record must be submitted to the Regional Director or Chief Administrative Judge of the appropriate regional or field office, or to the Clerk of the Board, U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, 1615 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20419-0001, depending on which office has custody of the record. The request must be in writing, must be identified conspicuously on the outside of the envelope and the letter as a “PRIVACY ACT REQUEST,” and must include the following information: ( a ) An identification of the record to be amended;
( b ) A description of the amendment requested; and
( c ) A statement of the basis for the amendment, along with supporting documentation, if any.
[64 FR 51043, Sept. 21, 1999, as amended at 65 FR 48886, Aug. 10, 2000]
#### Leah Bolotoff et al., Appellants, v. Sonotone Corporation, Respondent.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff wife, and companion action by plaintiff husband for loss of services. Order granting in part and denying in part plaintiffs’ motion for an examination of the defendant by a named employee under a commission, upon written interrogatories, modified on the facts by inserting in the first ordering paragraph item 5. As thus modified, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. Item 5 was not opposed by the defendant and was proper in form. *{Scheurenbrand*v. *Ferrizz,*262 App. Div. 1035; *Foley*v. *Long Island B. B. Go.,*242 App. Div. 780.) Its omission may have been due to inadvertence and could have been the subject of remedy by a motion for resettlement of the order. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Wenzel, J., not voting.
### §88. Disposition of coal by United States

If the coal-land laws have been or shall be extended over lands applied for, entered, or patented hereunder the coal deposits therein shall be subject to disposal by the United States in accordance with the provisions of the coal-land laws in force at the time of such disposal. Any person qualified to acquire coal deposits or the right to mine and remove the coal under the laws of the United States shall have the right at all times to enter upon the lands applied for, entered, or patented under sections 86 to 89 of this title, for the purpose of prospecting for coal thereon, if such coal deposits are then subject to disposition, upon the approval by the Secretary of the Interior of a bond or undertaking to be filed with him as security for the payment of all damages to the crops and improvements on such lands by reason of such prospecting. Any person who has acquired from the United States the coal deposits in any such lands, or the right to mine or remove the same, may reenter and occupy so much of the surface thereof as may be required for all purposes reasonably incident to the mining and removal of the coal therefrom, and mine and remove the coal, upon payment of the damages caused thereby to the owner thereof, or upon giving a good and sufficient bond or undertaking in an action instituted in any competent court to ascertain and fix said damages. The owner under such limited patent shall have the right to mine coal for personal use upon the land for domestic purposes at any time prior to the disposal by the United States of the coal deposits. Nothing herein contained shall be held to deny or abridge the right to present and have prompt consideration of applications made under the applicable land laws of the United States for any such surplus lands which have been or may be classified as coal lands with a view of disproving such classification and securing a patent without reservation.

(Feb. 27, 1917, ch. 133, §3, 39 Stat. 945.)