alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
             -----------------------------------------------------

      The following schedules reflect the information used in calculating the
number of shares in the computation of net loss per share for each of the
periods set forth in the Statements of Operations.

                                       1
<PAGE>
 
                         ENERGY BIOSYSTEMS CORPORATION


                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997
 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

 
      TOTAL                      # DAYS
     SHARES                    OUTSTANDING
----------------------------------------------------
<S>           <C>         <C>           <C> 
11,497,135     x               15   =    172,457,025
11,502,135     x                1   =     11,502,135
11,502,235     x                7   =     80,515,645
11,502,395     x               18   =    207,043,110
11,505,395     x                8   =     92,043,160
11,506,053     x               13   =    149,578,689
11,507,163     x                6   =     69,042,978
11,605,377     x               22   =    255,378,294
                               --      -------------
                               90      1,037,561,036      11,528,456
                                                          ==========
 
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997
 
LOSS PER SHARE:
 
Net Loss plus dividend accrual

 plus accretion of offering costs        ($2,870,560)   =     ($0.25)
---------------------------------      ----------------   ==========
   Weighted Avg. Shares                   11,528,456
 
</TABLE>

                                       2
<PAGE>
 
                         ENERGY BIOSYSTEMS CORPORATION
 
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
 
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1996
 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

 
      TOTAL                   # DAYS
      SHARES               OUTSTANDING
----------------------------------------------------
<S>           <C>          <C>           <C> 
10,584,268     x              23    =    243,438,164
11,107,568     x              14    =    155,505,952
11,139,268     x              27    =    300,760,236
11,140,768     x               8    =     89,126,144
11,142,868     x              19    =    211,714,492
                              --       -------------
                              91       1,000,544,988      10,995,000
                                                         ============
 
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1996
 
LOSS PER SHARE:
 
Net Loss plus dividend accrual      
 plus accretion of offering costs       ($2,503,079)   =     ($0.23)
                                      ----------------   ============
   Weighted Avg. Shares                  10,995,000

</TABLE> 

                                       3
§ 2422.6 How are parties notified of the filing of a petition? ( a ) *Notification to parties.* After you file a petition the Regional Director will notify any labor organization, agency, or activity identified as being affected by issues raised by the petition, that a petition has been filed. The Regional Director will also make reasonable efforts to identify and notify any other party affected by the issues raised by the petition.
( b ) *Contents of the notification.* The notification will inform the labor organization, agency, or activity of: ( 1 ) Your name (the petitioner);
( 2 ) The description of the unit(s) or employees affected by issues raised in the petition; and,
( 3 ) A statement that all affected parties should advise the Regional Director in writing of their interest in the issues raised in the petition.
472 P.2d 984

#### Rufina P. LOPEZ, Administratrix of the Estate of Frank C. Lopez, Deceased, Petitioner, v. Eduardo MAES and Mabel Gallegos, Respondents.

No. 9092.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

July 20, 3970.

Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 392, 81 N.M. 693, 472 P.2d 658, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-115 August 25, 2005

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING ON NUCLEAR SECURITY 

ON SEPT. 1 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting Sept. 1 in Rockville, Md., to

discuss security enhancements required of NRC licensees and to present ongoing regulatory efforts in

the area of security at commercial nuclear facilities in the U.S. 

Senior officials from the agency’s Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response will

discuss security matters related to commercial nuclear facilities, radioactive materials and

transportation of nuclear waste. Officials will also discuss security oversight, including force-on-force

exercises and inspections, enforcement and the design basis threat. There will be opportunities

throughout the meeting for questions and comments from the public.

The NRC holds annual meetings to brief the public on security issues related to nuclear power

and related facilities. Additional information on security improvements following the events of 9/11 is

available at: http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/safeguards/post-911.html .

The meeting will take place from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. in the auditorium of the agency’s Two White

Flint North building, at 11545 Rockville Pike. A complete agenda is attached and also available on the

NRC’s Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/public-meetings/index.cfm . Individuals with

questions or those wanting to make public statements during the meeting should send an e-mail to:

securemtg@nrc.gov .

###
§ 10300.103 Prior approval for outside employment and outside activities. ( a ) *General requirement.* Before engaging in any outside employment or outside activity, as it is defined in § 10300.102, an employee of the FMCS, other than a special government employee, must obtain written approval.
( b ) *Procedure for requesting approval.* The employee must first obtain written approval from the employee's immediate supervisor and then the Designated Agency Ethics Official (DAEO). If the employee does not obtain written approval from the employee's immediate supervisor, the employee may request review by the DAEO. Decisions by the DAEO are final and non-appealable.
( c ) *Standard for approval.* Approval shall be granted only upon a determination that the outside employment or outside activity is not expected to involve conduct prohibited by statute or Federal regulation, including 5 CFR part 2635.
( d ) *Revised requests.* Upon a significant change in the nature or scope of the outside employment or outside activity or in the employee's official position with the FMCS, the employee must, within 7 calendar days of the change, submit a revised request for approval. If there are no significant changes in the nature or scope of the outside employment or outside activity or in the employee's official position with the FMCS, the employee does not need to reapply after the FMCS' initial approval.
( e ) *Implementation guidance.* The DAEO may issue instructions or manual issuances governing the submission of requests for approval of outside employment or outside activities. The instructions or manual issuances may exempt categories of employment and activities from the prior approval requirement of this section based on a determination that employment or activity within those categories of employment or activities would generally be approved and is not likely to involve conduct prohibited by statute or Federal regulation, including 5 CFR part 2635. The DAEO may include in these instructions or issuances examples of outside employment and activities that are permissible or impermissible consistent with this part and 5 CFR part 2635.
### §188a. Surrender of leases

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to accept the surrender of any lease issued pursuant to any of the provisions of this chapter, or any amendment thereof, where the surrender is filed in the Bureau of Land Management subsequent to the accrual but prior to the payment of the yearly rental due under the lease, upon payment of the accrued rental on a pro rata monthly basis for the portion of the lease year prior to the filing of the surrender. The authority granted to the Secretary of the Interior by this section shall extend only to cases in which he finds that the failure of the lessee to file a timely surrender of the lease prior to the accrual of the rental was not due to a lack of reasonable diligence, but it shall not extend to claims or cases which have been referred to the Department of Justice for purposes of suit.

(Nov. 28, 1943, ch. 329, 57 Stat. 593; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which comprises this chapter.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Bureau of Land Management" substituted in text for "General Land Office" on authority of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, §403, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
§ 1603.2 Basic vesting rules. ( a ) All amounts in a CSRS employee's individual account are immediately vested.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, all amounts in a FERS employee's or uniformed service member's individual account (including all first conversion contributions) are immediately vested.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, upon separation from Government service without meeting the applicable service requirements of § 1603.3, a FERS employee's or a BRS uniformed service member's Agency Automatic (1%) Contributions and attributable earnings will be forfeited.
( d ) If a FERS employee or uniformed service member dies (or died) after January 7, 1988, without meeting the applicable service requirements set forth in § 1603.3, the Agency Automatic (1%) Contributions and attributable earnings in his or her individual account are deemed vested and shall not be forfeited. If a FERS employee died on or before January 7, 1988, without meeting those service requirements, his or her Agency Automatic (1%) Contributions and attributable earnings are forfeited to the Thrift Savings Plan.
[82 FR 60104, Dec. 19, 2017]
Camellia japonica 'Anacostia'

(NA35667; PI 659061) 

USDA Zones 7-9, possibly into Zone 6b. 

 

'Anacostia' is a hybrid selected in the 1970s by Sylvester March for its outstanding 

spring floral display, rich dark green foliage, and cold hardiness. It resulted from a cross 

between a white-flowered selection of C. japonica and C. japonica ‘Z’, a cultivar with 

reportedly increased cold tolerance. 

'Anacostia' was selected for its abundant, large, semi-double, medium-pink flowers; dark, 

glossy, evergreen foliage; rounded growth habit; and increased cold tolerance. 

Height and width: 12 feet high and 7 feet wide in 30 years. 

Habit: Evergreen, relatively compact, rounded shrub. 

Foliage: Glossy, dark evergreen. 

Flowers: Large (up to 4 inches in diameter), medium-bright pink, semi-double. 

Semi-hardwood cuttings should be taken in mid- to late summer when the bark is still 

green but just turning to light brown. Cuttings root readily in 10 weeks under intermittent 

mist with a quick dip in liquid rooting hormone containing 1000 ppm IBA and 500 ppm 

NAA, or it can be grafted. 

Background planting in the shrub border, specimen plant, hedge or screen, mass planted 

in large areas. 

For a list of wholesale nurseries propagating this plant, contact Carole Bordelon, U.S. 

National Arboretum, 3501 New York Ave., NE, Washington, DC 20002-1958, 

Carole.Bordelon@ars.usda.gov 

Botanical Name:

 

Hardiness: 

Development:

 

Significance:

 

Description:

Propagation:

 

Landscape Use:

Availability: 

 

 

U.S. National Arboretum Plant Introduction 

Visit us on the web: www.usna.usda.gov September 2010 

Camellia japonica 'Anacostia' 

U.S. National Arboretum Plant Introduction
EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement (No.
333-52005)  on Form S-1 of U.S.  Timberlands  Klamath  Falls,  LLC of our report
dated  January 21,  2000  relating to the  consolidated  balance  sheets of U.S.
Timberlands  Klamath Falls, LLC and subsidiary as of December 31, 1999 and 1998,
and the  related  consolidated  statements  of  operations,  changes in members'
equity  (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended,  which report appears
in the December 31, 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K of U.S.  Timberlands Klamath
Falls, LLC.


                                                Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP




New York, New York
April 14, 2000
#### § 2430.8 Filing and service of documents.

All pleadings or documents after the time the case is referred by the Authority to an Administative Law Judge, until the issuance of the Judge's decision, shall be filed in an original and four copies with the Administrative Law Judge and served on all parties to the proceeding. Service of such documents shall be in the same manner as prescribed in §§ 2429.22 and 2429.27.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 AMSURG CORP.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Ken P. McDonaldKen P. McDonaldPresident and Chief Executive
Officer of the CompanyMay 4, 2007/s/ Claire M. GulmiClaire M. GulmiExecutive Vice President
and Chief Financial
Officer of the CompanyMay 4, 2007
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-082 May 23, 2005

NRC ENDS LICENSE FOR TROJAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANT,

RELEASES SITE FOR UNRESTRICTED USE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has granted the request of Portland General Electric

(PGE) to terminate its license for the Trojan nuclear power plant, which closed permanently in

November 1992, and has released for unrestricted use the area where the plant formerly operated. The

facility was located in Columbia County, Ore., about 42 miles north of Portland. 

PGE’s NRC license to store spent fuel removed from the reactor at an independent installation

on another portion of the site will remain in effect and is not affected by this action.

Trojan began commercial operations in May 1976, with a net electrical output rating of 1130

megawatts electric. After PGE decided to cease operation of the reactor permanently, it conducted

cleanup and decommissioning activities in accordance with its NRC-approved license termination plan

from February 2001 to December 2004. The NRC offered the public an opportunity for a hearing on

the plan, but no request was filed. Decommissioning activities included dismantlement of the reactor

and decontamination. The reactor vessel, which represented most of the remaining radioactive

material, except for the spent fuel, was removed from the site in 1999. 

In December 2004, PGE submitted an application for termination of its license, indicating that

it has completed radiological decommissioning and that final radiation surveys of the site show that it

meets NRC criteria for decommissioning and release for unrestricted use. 

NRC conducted a number of on-site inspections of the licensee’s actions during the

decommissioning process to verify that decommissioning and cleanup were being conducted as

described in the license termination plan and to evaluate the quality of this activity. The agency also

conducted independent measurements to verify the company’s final radiation surveys. NRC has

concluded that (1) dismantlement and decontamination activities were performed in accordance with

the approved license termination plan and (2) the final radiation surveys and associated documentation

demonstrate the facility and site have met the criteria for decommissioning in Part 20 of the

Commission’s regulations. Therefore, the license has been terminated. 

 ###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 05-132 September 28, 2005

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS 

TO MEET OCT. 6-8 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS)

will hold a public meeting Oct. 6-8 in Rockville, Md., to discuss, among other items, the license

renewal application for the Browns Ferry nuclear power plant, units 1, 2 and 3, in Alabama. The

committee will also discuss pressure vessel head integrity calculations related to the Davis-Besse

nuclear power plant and be briefed by NRC staff on licensee response to an agency bulletin on

emergency preparedness and response actions for security-based events.

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at

11545 Rockville Pike. It will begin at 8:30 a.m. each day and end at 7 p.m. on Thursday and Friday; the

session on Saturday will end at 12:30 p.m. A complete agenda is available on the NRC’s Web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2005/ . Anyone with questions or those

wanting to make public statements during the meeting should contact Sam Duraiswamy at 301-415-

7364.

The ACRS, as mandated by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, advises the

Commission on licensing, the operation of nuclear power plants and related safety issues.

###
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 27, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62709-62710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23977]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and

[[Page 62710]]

the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS 
Initial Review Group Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Research 
Review Committee.
    Date: November 30-December 1, 2004.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Latham Hotel, 3000 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20007.
    Contact Person: Roberta Binder, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, DHHS/NIH/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Rm 3130, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, (301) 496-7966, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89fbebb8bfb0e7c9e7e0e1a7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ed9f8fdcdbd483ad838485c38a829b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 19, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-23977 Filed 10-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Collaborative Study of NUPEC Seismic Field Test Data for NPP Structures (NUREG/CR-6822, BNL-NUREG-71355-2003)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6822 (PDF - 4.22 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**June 2003**Date Published:**June 2003

**Prepared by:** J. Xu, C. Costantino, C. Hofmayer Energy Science and Technology Department Brookhaven National Laboratory Building 130 P.O. Box 5000 Upton, New York 11973-5000 

Syed A. Ali, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:**Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6081

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Nuclear Power Engineering Corporation (NUPEC) conducted a multi-year test program for the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI) of Japan to investigate different aspects of the soil-structure interaction (SSI) effect. The program, consisting of both field and laboratory tests, was developed to address various SSI aspects, including the dynamic cross-interaction (DCI) effect on the seismic response of NPP structures built in close proximity to each other. The program also was performed to verify the adequacy of the available analytical tools for predicting the SSI effect. As part of collaborative efforts between the United States and Japan on seismic issues, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) participated in a program to apply the industry practice to predict the structural response to recorded earthquake events, including the DCI effect, and to interpret the observed data. The overall objectives of the U.S.-Japan collaboration on the DCI issue were, through the exchange of mutual knowledge and useful information on the DCI test data, to gain valuable insights into understanding the complex phenomena and dynamic response mechanism of DCI effects under earthquake ground motions. Another objective was to validate, confirm, and capture the limitations of analytical methods or computer codes, which may lead to improvements of the existing analysis methods, and remove unnecessary conservatism in seismic design. BNL has completed its study of the field test data as provided by NUPEC. This report summarizes the BNL study and the insights drawn from the comparisons of the BNL analysis results and the NUPEC field-recorded earthquake responses.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021