alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-043 April 19, 2004

NRC RENEWS LICENSE FOR H.B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT 2,

FOR AN ADDITIONAL 20 YEARS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has renewed the operating license of Unit 2 of the nuclear

power facility at the H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, located in Darlington County, S.C., for an

additional 20 years. The plant is operated by Carolina Power & Light Company (CP&L).

CP&L submitted its license renewal application to the NRC on June 14, 2002. The renewal

extends the license for H.B. Robinson Unit 2 from July 31, 2010, to July 31, 2030.

The NRC’s environmental review is described in a site-specific supplement to the NRC’s

“Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Power Plants," (NUREG1437, Supplement 13). In the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, issued in

December 2003, the staff concluded that there were no impacts that would preclude renewal of the

license for environmental reasons. Two public meetings to discuss the environmental review were held

near the plant on September 25, 2002, and June 25, 2003.

In its “Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of H.B. Robinson Steam

Electric Plant, Unit 2,” issued in January 2004, the NRC staff concluded that there were no safety

concerns that would preclude license renewal, because the licensee had demonstrated the capability to

manage the effects of plant aging. In addition, the NRC conducted inspections of the plants to verify

information submitted by the licensee. The Safety Evaluation Report is available on the NRC Web site

at this address: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/robinson.html .

On March 18, 2004, the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards -- an independent body of

technical experts which advises the Commission -- issued its recommendation that the operating

license for H.B. Robinson, Unit 2, be renewed. That recommendation is contained in "Report on the

Safety Aspects of the License Renewal Application for the H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit

2." A copy of this document is available on the NRC Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/letters/2004/5102069.pdf .
-2-

The H.B. Robinson license renewal brings the total number of renewals to 24 units. A

complete listing of completed renewal applications, as well as those currently under review, can be

found on the NRC’s Web site at this address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications.html .

###
**GAO-08-991T**                      Published: Jul 10, 2008. Publicly Released: Jul 10, 2008.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

The Boeing Company protested the award of a contract to Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation by the Department of the Air Force for KC-X aerial refueling tankers. Boeing challenged the Air Force's technical and cost evaluations, conduct of discussions, and source selection decision. Because Boeing competed for the contract, it is an interested party for purposes of filing a protest. Under the Competition in Contracting Act of 1984, GAO is required to consider protests of contract awards filed by interested parties. In deciding protests, GAO makes a determination of whether the agency's actions complied with procurement statutes and regulations.

## Full Report

Highlights

Full Report (15 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Ocean One Physical Therapy, P.C., as Assignee of Maxim Savelyev, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>21st Century Centennial Insurance Company, Respondent. </font></b></div><br><br><p>Law Offices of Damin J. Toell, P.C. (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant.Law Offices of Buratti, Rothenberg &amp; Burns (Konstantinos Tsirkas of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Harriet L. Thompson, J.), entered July 7, 2017. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath (EUOs) and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.</p><p>Plaintiff's contention that defendant failed to establish that its time to pay or deny the claims at issue were tolled lacks merit. While plaintiff correctly contends that the letters annexed to defendant's motion as Exhibit "D" were delay letters which failed to toll defendant's time to pay or deny the claims, defendant's motion also included copies of the EUO scheduling letters mailed by the law firm retained by defendant to conduct the EUOs, and plaintiff has raised no issue with respect to the sufficiency of those letters (<a href="../2008/2008_04072.htm" target="_blank"><i>see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co.</i>, 50 AD3d 1123</a> [2008]; <a href="../2014/2014_51814.htm" target="_blank"><i>Great Health Care Chiropractic, P.C. v Nationwide Ins.</i>, 46 Misc 3d 130</a>[A], 2014 NY Slip Op 51812[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>&amp; 13th Jud Dists 2014]). Plaintiff's remaining contention is not properly before this court, as the argument is being raised for the first time on appeal (<a href="../2011/2011_07610.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Joe v Upper Room Ministries, Inc.</i>, 88 AD3d 963</a> [2011]; <i>Gulf Ins</i>. <a href="../2004/2004_09598.htm" target="_blank"><i>Co. v Kanen</i>, 13 AD3d 579</a> [2004]), and we decline to consider it.</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: August 02, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Order filed September 29, 2020 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00540-CV

____________

FELIX P. BABAUTA, Appellant

V.

DEBRA V. JENNINGS AND RALPAHELL V. WILKINS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-23475

O R D E R

On July 26, 2020, this court issued an order stating that appellant must file a 

brief by August 17, 2020 or his appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Appellant did not file a brief and instead filed an objection to our order. 

Appellant’s objection is denied. Appellant’s complaints regarding the reporter’s 

record were overruled by the trial court in its order dated June 28, 2018. If 

appellant still has complaints regarding the record, he may present those in his 

brief on appeal.
If appellant’s brief is not before or on October 20, 2020, this appeal will be 

dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Spain, Hassan, and Poissant.
### §3032. Service credit as deck officer or junior engineer for promotion purposes

For purposes of promotion, there shall be counted in addition to active commissioned service, service as deck officer or junior engineer.

(Pub. L. 107–372, title II, §232, Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3088.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Provisions similar to this section are contained in section 854a of this title.
EXHIBIT 31.1







CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a)



I, Jean Paul Roy, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of GeoGlobal Resources Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such  disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small  business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





Date: August 2, 2005

/s/ Jean Paul Roy

------------------------

Jean Paul Roy

President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 1636.149 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 1636.150, no qualified individual with handicaps shall, because the agency's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by individuals with handicaps, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the agency.
### §2714. Designation of source and advertisement

#### (a) Designation of source and notification

When the President receives information of an incident, the President shall, where possible and appropriate, designate the source or sources of the discharge or threat. If a designated source is a vessel or a facility, the President shall immediately notify the responsible party and the guarantor, if known, of that designation.

#### (b) Advertisement by responsible party or guarantor

(1) If a responsible party or guarantor fails to inform the President, within 5 days after receiving notification of a designation under subsection (a), of the party's or the guarantor's denial of the designation, such party or guarantor shall advertise the designation and the procedures by which claims may be presented, in accordance with regulations promulgated by the President. Advertisement under the preceding sentence shall begin no later than 15 days after the date of the designation made under subsection (a). If advertisement is not otherwise made in accordance with this subsection, the President shall promptly and at the expense of the responsible party or the guarantor involved, advertise the designation and the procedures by which claims may be presented to the responsible party or guarantor. Advertisement under this subsection shall continue for a period of no less than 30 days.

(2) An advertisement under paragraph (1) shall state that a claimant may present a claim for interim, short-term damages representing less than the full amount of damages to which the claimant ultimately may be entitled and that payment of such a claim shall not preclude recovery for damages not reflected in the paid or settled partial claim.

#### (c) Advertisement by President

If—

(1) the responsible party and the guarantor both deny a designation within 5 days after receiving notification of a designation under subsection (a),

(2) the source of the discharge or threat was a public vessel, or

(3) the President is unable to designate the source or sources of the discharge or threat under subsection (a),

the President shall advertise or otherwise notify potential claimants of the procedures by which claims may be presented to the Fund.

(Pub. L. 101–380, title I, §1014, Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 501; Pub. L. 104–324, title XI, §1142(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3991.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–324 designated existing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Functions of President under this section delegated to Secretary of Department in which Coast Guard is operating by section 7(d)(2) of Ex. Ord. No. 12777, Oct. 18, 1991, 56 F.R. 54768, set out as a note under section 1321 of this title.
#### §§ 2416.111-2416.129 [Reserved]
§ 2422.29 How does the Region address an inconclusive election? ( a ) *Inconclusive elections.* An inconclusive election is one where challenged ballots are not sufficient to affect the outcome of the election and one of the following occurs: ( 1 ) The ballot provides for at least three (3) choices, one of which is “no union” or “neither,” and the votes are equally divided; or
( 2 ) The ballot provides for at least three (3) choices, the choice receiving the highest number of votes does not receive a majority, and at least two other choices receive the next highest and same number of votes; or
( 3 ) When a runoff ballot provides for a choice between two labor organizations and results in the votes being equally divided; or
( 4 ) When the Regional Director determines that there have been significant procedural irregularities.
( b ) *Eligibility to vote in a rerun election.* The Region uses the latest payroll period to determine eligibility to vote in a rerun election.
( c ) *Ballot.* If the Regional Director determines that the election is inconclusive, the election will be rerun with all the choices that appeared on the original ballot.
( d ) *Number of reruns.* There will be only one rerun of an inconclusive election. If the rerun results in another inconclusive election, the tally of ballots will show a majority of valid ballots has not been cast for any choice, and the Regional Director will issue a certification of results. If necessary, a runoff may be held when an original election is rerun.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-039 May 17, 2002

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC SUSPENDS NRC LICENSE OF NEW JERSEY RADIOGRAPHY COMPANY 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued an order suspending the NRC license of

United Evaluation Services, Inc., of Beachwood, N.J., because of deliberate violations of agency

requirements. The order to United Evaluation, formerly Accurate Technologies Inc., is effective

immediately.

In September 2001, a radiographer from United Evaluation was performing work in Baltimore,

Md., and received a very significant radiation exposure to his hands in excess of regulatory limits (at a

minimum 250-300 rem) while performing radiography. Apparently, the source failed to fully retract to

the shielded position following a previous radiographic exposure and the radiographer approached the

device without a survey meter, and without wearing an alarming ratemeter. Either one of those

precautions would have alerted the radiographer that the source was not in a shielded position. 

Although this event occurred while working in Baltimore under a license issued to the company by the

State of Maryland (an NRC Agreement State), the company also possesses an NRC license authorizing

similar activities within states subject to NRC jurisdiction.

 Based on the NRC investigation and inspection, which are still underway, the NRC has

concluded that the radiographer who was overexposed had not received annual refresher training and

not taken the training exam, as required. Instead, an assistant radiographer completed the annual exam

in his place. In addition, the President/Radiation Safety Officer provided the NRC with an inaccurate

training record. 

The NRC has also found that the former Operations Manager knowingly transported and used a

radiographic device in New Jersey without the required end cap, which ensures proper shielding of the

radioactive source. In addition, the President/Radiation Safety Officer, in writing and during the

inspection deliberately provided inaccurate information to the NRC. The NRC has also determined

that an assistant radiographer performed the duties of a radiographer knowing that he was not certified

to do so.

In the order, Martin Virgilio, Acting Deputy Executive Director for Materials, Research and

State Programs, said, “These actions by the Licensee have raised serious doubt as to whether the

Licensee can be relied upon in the future to comply with NRC requirements.”
The order requires the company, among other things, to suspend all use of NRC licensed

material and place it in locked storage. The company also must provide information to the NRC on

why its license should not be modified or revoked.

The company has 20 days to respond to the order. 

###
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 27, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62729-62730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24015]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Proposed Generic Communication; Establishing and Maintaining a 
Safety Conscious Work Environment; Correction

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of opportunity for public comment; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a notice appearing in the Federal 
Register on October 14, 2004 (69 FR 61049), that requests public 
comment on a guidance document for licensees on establishing and 
maintaining a safety conscious work environment. This action is 
necessary to correct an erroneous Web site.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisamarie Jarriel, Agency Allegations 
Advisor, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, DC 20555-0001, (301) 415-8529, email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#024e4e48426c70612c656d74"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="97dbdbddd7f9e5f4b9f0f8e1">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On page 61049, in the second column, in the 
second complete paragraph, in the last sentence, the Web site is 
corrected to read, ``http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/regulatory/
allegations/scwe-guide.html.''

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day of October 2004.


[[Page 62730]]


    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Michael T. Lesar,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-24015 Filed 10-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Attached is vivaAerobus exemption renewal application Hermosillo, Mexico and Las Vegas, Nevada.
§ 1312.9 Downgrading and declassification. Classified information originated by OMB offices will be downgraded or declassified as soon as it no longer qualifies for continued protection under the provisions of the classification guides. Authority to downgrade or declassify OMB-originated information is granted to those authorized to classify (See § 1312.5). Additionally, the Associate Director (or Assistant Director) for Administration is authorized to exercise downgrading and declassification actions up to and including the Top Secret level. ( a ) *Transferred material.* Information which was originated by an agency that no longer exists, or that was received by OMB in conjunction with a transfer of functions, is deemed to be OMB-originated material. Information which has been transferred to another agency for storage purposes remains the responsibility of OMB.
( b ) *Periodic review of classified material.* Each office possessing classified material will review that material on an annual basis or in conjunction with the transfer of files to non-current record storage and take action to downgrade or declassify all material no longer qualifying for continued protection at that level. All material transferred to non-current record storage must be properly marked with correct downgrade and declassification instructions.