alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2426]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 04-021]


Notice of Information Collection Under OMB Review

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of information collection.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as part of 
its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this 
opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information 
collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).

DATES: All comments should be submitted within 30 calendar days from 
the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to Desk Officer for NASA; 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs; Office of Management and 
Budget; Room 10236; New Executive Office Building; Washington, DC 
20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Nancy Kaplan, NASA Reports 
Officer, (202) 358-1372.
    Title: Locator and Information Services Tracking System (LISTS) 
Form.
    OMB Number: 2700-0064.
    Type of review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Need and Uses: Information collected is used primarily to support 
Goddard Space Flight Center services that are dependent upon accurate 
locator-type information.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Number of Respondents: 8,455.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 8,455.
    Hours Per Request: 5 minutes per response.
    Annual Burden Hours: 702.
    Frequency of Report: Other (as required).

Patricia L. Dunnington,
Chief Information Officer, Office of the Administrator.
[FR Doc. 04-2426 Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
§ 2472.8 Preliminary hearing procedures. When the Panel determines that a hearing shall be held, and it appoints one or more of its designees to conduct such a hearing, it will issue and serve upon each of the parties a notice of hearing and a notice of prehearing conference, if any. The notice will state: ( a ) The names of the parties to the dispute;
( b ) The date, time, place, type, and purpose of the hearing;
( c ) The date, time, place, and purpose of the prehearing conference, if any;
( d ) The name of the designated representative(s) appointed by the Panel;
( e ) The issue(s) to be resolved; and
( f ) The method, if any, by which the hearing shall be transcribed.
[61 FR 41296, Aug. 8, 1996]
[Front Matter]

[Title Page]

** Evidence Report/Technology Assessment**
### §3206a. Tsunami Science and Technology Advisory Panel

#### (a) Designation

The Administrator shall designate an existing working group within the Science Advisory Board of the Administration to serve as the Tsunami Science and Technology Advisory Panel to provide advice to the Administrator on matters regarding tsunami science, technology, and regional preparedness.

#### (b) Membership

#### (1) Composition

The Panel shall be composed of no fewer than 7 members selected by the Administrator from among individuals from academia or State agencies who have academic or practical expertise in physical sciences, social sciences, information technology, coastal resilience, emergency management, or such other disciplines as the Administrator considers appropriate.

#### (2) Federal employment

No member of the Panel may be a Federal employee.

#### (c) Responsibilities

Not less frequently than once every 4 years, the Panel shall—

(1) review the activities of the Administration, and other Federal activities as appropriate, relating to tsunami research, detection, forecasting, warning, mitigation, resiliency, and preparation; and

(2) submit to the Administrator and such others as the Administrator considers appropriate—

(A) the findings of the working group with respect to the most recent review conducted under paragraph (1); and

(B) such recommendations for legislative or administrative action as the working group considers appropriate to improve Federal tsunami research, detection, forecasting, warning, mitigation, resiliency, and preparation.

#### (d) Reports to Congress

Not less frequently than once every 4 years, the Administrator shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives a report on the findings and recommendations received by the Administrator under subsection (c)(2).

(Pub. L. 109–479, title VIII, §808, as added Pub. L. 115–25, title V, §508(a)(2), Apr. 18, 2017, 131 Stat. 125.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 808 of Pub. L. 109–479 was renumbered section 809 and is classified to section 3207 of this title.
### §557b. Sale of publications, charts, or other material; deposit of proceeds

The Chief of Engineers is authorized to provide for the sale of any of the material prepared under authority of section 557a of this title; and of publications, charts, or material prepared under his direction pursuant to other legislative authorization or appropriation, and to charge therefor a sum not less than the cost of reproduction. The money received from sales authorized by this section shall be deposited into the Treasury to the credit of miscellaneous receipts, except that in any case in which the cost of reproduction has been paid from the revolving fund established pursuant to the Civil Functions Appropriation Act, 1954, the proceeds shall be deposited to the credit of such fund.

(Pub. L. 85–480, §2, July 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 279.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Civil Functions Appropriation Act, 1954, referred to in text, is act July 27, 1953, ch. 245, 67 Stat. 197. Provisions of the Act establishing the revolving fund are classified to section 576 of this title.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

# RECEIVED 

# .0
..**~-** ************************************ Federal Aviation Administration 

## * ***~~!A~OO~f** Complainant 

## * v. 

## * * Robert Zeige, 

## * * Respondent 

## * 

## * * ************************************* Judge [Unassigned] FAA DocketNo. CP09S000003 FAA2009-0182 FAA Case No. 2009S0700030

MOTION FORPARTIAL DECISION

The Complainant, by and through the undersigned attorney, pursuant to Sections 13.209(a), 13.209(f), 13.218(f)(2)(ii)oftheRules ofPractice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions (14 C.P.R. §13.209(a), 13 .209(f), 13 .218(f)(2)(ii), hereby moves the Administrative LawJudge to deem each allegation contained in the complaint as the truth. As grounds for this motion, Complainant states the following: 1. On March 6, 2009, Complainant filed the complaint inthis matter with the Hearing Docket and served a copy on Respondent. 2. Respondent received the Complaint onMarch 9, 2009. 

# I I I I I

I I

I I I

### 3. Pursuant to §13.209(a) and §13.2ll(e) Respondent had 35 days (30 days plus 5 for mail service) to file an answer. Under these rules, Respondent's answer was due approximately Aprilll, 2009. To date, Complainanthas not received an answer to the Complaint. According to §13.209(f), a person's failure to file an answer without good
cause shall be deemed an admission ofthe truth ofeach allegation contained inthe complaint. See, FAA v. Budde W. Playter, FAADocketNo. CP89GL0257 (March 19, 1990) ("Although this is a severe penalty for failure to file an answer, the rule is clear and does not permit exceptions.") 

### 4. On February 16,2011, Complainant filed its Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted (MIDAA). Exhibit 1. Itwas received by Respondent on February 25, 2011. Exhibit 2. Pursuant to §13.218(d) Respondenthad 10 days (plus 5 days for mail service) to file an
answer the MTDAA. Complainant never received an answer to the MTDAA.
WHEREFORE, Complainantrespectfully requests that the Administrative Law Judge deem as an admission oftruth each allegation inthe complaint. Additionally, ifthe Administrative Law Judge deems a hearing to be necessary inthis case, Complainant
move thejudgeto find that the hearing will only be to detemline the final sanction imposed.Respectfully submitted this 

## ,;LS th day ofFebruary, 2013.

# ~~-&~~ DELTRJCK H.

# JOHNS~;- Attomey Office ofthe Regional CounselCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify thatthe foregoing document has been mailed by Certified Mail to the following locations: Hearing Docket Clerk FAA, AGC-430, Suite 2Wl000 Wilbur Wright Building 800 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20591 Robert Zeige 4140 Clemmons Road Suite 370 Clemmons, NC 27012

Dated (original + 1 copy)

(1 copy)+releasable copy ofEIR
### §1294. Public information and education on recycling and reuse of wastewater, use of land treatment, and reduction of wastewater volume

The Administrator shall develop and operate within one year of December 27, 1977, a continuing program of public information and education on recycling and reuse of wastewater (including sludge), the use of land treatment, and methods for the reduction of wastewater volume.

(June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title II, §214, as added Pub. L. 95–217, §38, Dec. 27, 1977, 91 Stat. 1581.)
### §5622. Lump sum allowance for Corrections Calendar Office

There shall be a lump sum allowance of $300,000 per fiscal year for the salaries and expenses of the Corrections Calendar Office, established by section 5621 of this title. Such amount shall be allocated between the majority party and the minority party as determined by the Speaker, in consultation with the minority leader.

(Pub. L. 105–55, title I, §101, Oct. 7, 1997, 111 Stat. 1183.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 74d–1 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is based on section 1 of House Resolution No. 130, One Hundred Fifth Congress, Apr. 24, 1997, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 105–55.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Allowance

For transfer of lump sum allowance under this section to Offices of Speaker and Minority Leader, see section 5624 of this title.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-143 December 11, 2002

 NRC APPROVES POWER UPRATE FOR POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a request by Nuclear Management Company

to increase the generating capacity of the Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant by 1.4 percent. 

The power uprate at the plant, in Two Rivers, Wisconsin, will increase the generating capacity

of the Units 1 and 2 reactors from 511 megawatts electric to 518 each. The licensee intends to

implement the power uprate within 90 days.

The NRC’s safety evaluation of the requested power uprate for the plant focused on several

areas, including nuclear steam supply systems, instrumentation and control systems, electrical systems,

accident evaluations, radiological consequences, operations, and other technical specification changes.

The NRC staff determined that the licensee could safely increase the power output of the reactor

primarily through increased feedwater flow measurement accuracy.

###
§ 1655.11 Loan acceptance. If the requirements set forth in §§ 1655.2, 1655.4, and 1655.6(a) are satisfied, the TSP record keeper will nevertheless reject a loan request if: ( a ) The participant has failed to provide all required information on the loan request;
( b ) The participant has a pending loan request or in-service withdrawal request; or
( c ) A hold has been placed on the account pursuant to 5 CFR 1653.3(c).
[87 FR 31693, May 24, 2022]
### SUBCHAPTER IV—PERMITS AND LICENSES
### §7102. Definitions

In this chapter—

(1) "applicant" means a State, local government, or private nonprofit organization applying for assistance for one project.

(2) "assistance program" means a program of the United States Government providing assistance through a grant or contract but does not include revenue sharing, a loan, a loan guarantee, or insurance.

(3) "local government" means a county, city, political subdivision of a county or city, or other general purpose political subdivision of a State, a school district, a council of governments, or other instrumentality of a local government.

(4) "project" means an undertaking that includes components that contribute materially to carrying out one purpose or closely related purposes and are proposed or approved for assistance under—

(A) more than one United States Government program; or

(B) at least one Government program and at least one State program.

(5) "State" means a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, a territory or possession of the United States, an agency or instrumentality of a State, and a tribe as defined in section 3(c) of the Indian Financing Act of 1974 (25 U.S.C. 1452(c)).

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1035; Pub. L. 103–272, §4(f)(1)(V), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1363.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7102(1) | 42:4261(2), (4). | Dec. 5, 1974, Pub. L. 93–510, §12, 88 Stat. 1608. |
| 7102(2) | 42:4261(1). | |
| 7102(3) | 42:4261(6). | |
| 7102(4) | 42:4261(3). | |
| 7102(5) | 42:4261(5). | |

In clause (1), the words "applying for" are substituted for "seeking" for clarity. The words "acting separately or together" are omitted as unnecessary. The text of 42:4261(4) is omitted as unnecessary because of section 102 of the revised title.

In clause (2), the words "of the United States Government" are added for clarity. The words "assistance in the form of" are omitted as unnecessary.

In clause (3), the words "a county, city, political subdivision of a county or city, or other general purpose political subdivision of a State" are substituted for "a local unit of government including a city, county, parish, town, township, village," for consistency in the revised title and because of 1:2. The word "agency" is omitted because it is included in "instrumentality".

In clause (4), the words "that contribute" are substituted for "if each of those components" to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "whether of a temporary or continuing nature" are omitted as unnecessary.

In clause (5), the words "any of the several" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico" are omitted as being included in "territory or possession of the United States" and as unnecessary because of 48:734.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Par. (3). Pub. L. 103–272 substituted "political" for "politicial" after "other general purpose".
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Barrett J, O’Connor, certify that:

 

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of EFC Bancorp, Inc.;

 

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)                                  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

(b)                                 Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)                                  Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s controls and procedures and presented inthis annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation.

 

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

(a)                                  Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)                                 Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| March 17,  2005               |
|-------------------------------|
| /s/ Barrett  J. O’Connor |   |
| Barrett J.  O’Connor     |
| Chief  Executive Officer      |

 

----
### §3853. Liability in rem

A vessel operated in violation of the Convention, this chapter, or any regulation prescribed under this chapter, is liable in rem for any fine imposed under title 18 or civil penalty assessed pursuant to section 3852 of this title, and may be proceeded against in the United States district court of any district in which the vessel may be found.

(Pub. L. 111–281, title X, §1043, Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3031; Pub. L. 111–330, §1(20), Dec. 22, 2010, 124 Stat. 3571.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title X of Pub. L. 111–281, Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3023, which enacted this chapter and repealed chapter 37 (§2401 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of title X to the Code, see Tables.

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–330 substituted "under title 18" for "under section 18".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Pub. L. 111–330, §1, Dec. 22, 2010, 124 Stat. 3569, provided that the amendment made by section 1(20) is effective with the enactment of Pub. L. 111–281.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Stan Cipkowski, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of American Bio Medica
Corporation;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business  issuer's other certifying  officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to the small  business  issuer,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [omitted]; and

c)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  small  business  issuer's  disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's  internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business  issuer's  fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual  report) that has  materially  affected,  or is
reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the small business  issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business  issuer's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of
the small  business  issuer's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the
equivalent functions):

a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.


/s/ Stan Cipkowski
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer

Date:  November 13, 2006




                                       18
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-070 June 6, 2002

 NRC APPROVES POWER UPRATE FOR BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a request by Carolina Power & Light Co. to

increase the generating capacity of the Brunswick nuclear power plant, Units 1 and 2, by 15 percent

each.

The power uprate at the plant, near Southport, North Carolina, will increase the generating

capacity of Unit 1 from 841 megawatts electric to 958; and for Unit 2 from 835 megawatts electric to

951. The licensee intends to implement the power uprates immediately for Unit 1 and next year for

Unit 2.

The NRC’s safety evaluation of the requested power uprate for the plant focused on several

areas, including nuclear steam supply systems, instrumentation and control systems, electrical systems,

accident evaluations, radiological consequences, operations, and other technical specification changes.

The NRC staff determined that the licensee could safely increase the power output of the reactor

primarily by using new fuel in the core and making certain specified plant modifications.

###