alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-094 June 20, 2005

NRC COMPLETES RESTORATION OF ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

TO PUBLIC ACCESS VIA ITS ON-LINE LIBRARY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission Friday completed the restoration of public access to an

additional 70,000 documents through its on-line library, ADAMS, after conducting a securitysensitivity review. Members of the public are now able to access these documents, involving

administrative, contractual, research and other documents not related to a specific licensee, which were

removed from the public library on Oct. 25 of last year. 

The documents may be viewed and retrieved through the NRC’s Web-based ADAMS at

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html or by using CITRIX software at

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/citrix-based.html . Using CITRIX allows earlier access, by

perhaps a day, but requires downloading the appropriate software. Help in using Web-based ADAMS

or CITRIX is available by contacting the NRC Public Document Room by phone at 800-397-4209 or

301-415-4737, or by e-mail at pdr@nrc.gov . Links to many of these documents on the NRC’s public

Web site have also been restored; NRC staff are working to resolve information technology issues to

restore the remaining links.

“We are pleased that the public will once again be able to obtain these documents,” said

Edward T. Baker, Director of the NRC’s Office of Information Services. “While we are firmly 

supportive of openness in our regulatory process, it was important to remove these documents to

conduct a security review and remove information that could potentially be of use to a terrorist.”

The agency has previously restored access to about 163,000 non-sensitive documents. It

continues to evaluate documents dealing with nuclear materials licensees. 

###
### §65a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 65a was editorially reclassified as section 6507 of this title.
### §1308a. Use of civil penalty funds to reclaim lands

In fiscal year 2009 and thereafter, the Secretary of the Interior, pursuant to regulations, may use directly or through grants to States, moneys collected for civil penalties assessed under section 1268 of this title, to reclaim lands adversely affected by coal mining practices after August 3, 1977, to remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 111–8, div. E, title I, Mar. 11, 2009, 123 Stat. 712.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2009, and also as part of the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009, and not as part of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 which comprises this chapter.
§ 162.21 Responsibility and authority for seizures. ( a ) *Seizures by Customs officers.* Property may be seized, if available, by any Customs officer who has reasonable cause to believe that any law or regulation enforced by Customs and Border Protection or Immigration and Customs Enforcement has been violated, by reason of which the property has become subject to seizure or forfeiture. This paragraph does not authorize seizure when seizure or forfeiture is restricted by law or regulation (see, for example, § 162.75), nor does it authorize a remedy other than seizure when seizure or forfeiture is required by law or regulation. A receipt for seized property shall be given at the time of seizure to the person from whom the property is seized.
( b ) *Seizure by persons other than Customs officers.* The port director may adopt a seizure made by a person other than a Customs officer if such port director has reasonable cause to believe that the property is subject to forfeiture under the Customs laws.
( c ) *Seizure by State official.* If a duly constituted State official has seized any merchandise, vessel, aircraft, vehicle, or other conveyance under provisions of the statutes of such State, such property shall not be seized by a Customs officer unless the property is voluntarily turned over to him to be proceeded against under the Federal statutes.
[T.D. 72-211, 37 FR 16488, Aug. 15, 1972, as amended by T.D. 79-160, 44 FR 31956, June 4, 1979; USCBP-2006-0122, 73 FR 9011, Feb. 19, 2008]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-141 November 8, 2004

NRC SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON IMPLEMENTATION

OF REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking comment from members of the public on the

implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP), which the agency created five years ago to

revamp and improve its inspection and enforcement programs for commercial nuclear power plants. 

Each year the NRC seeks feedback to help the agency continue to improve its regulatory approach.

In particular, the NRC would like the public’s answers to a list of 20 questions relating to the

ROP, including the following:

-- Is the information in the inspection reports useful to you?

-- Is the ROP understandable and meaningful, and are the processes, procedures and products

clear and written in plain English?

-- Has the public had enough opportunity to participate in the ROP and provide input and

comments?

All 20 questions are contained in the Federal Register notice of the request for comment, which

was published Nov. 1. The notice is available through the Government Printing Office’s Web site at

this address:

http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/06jun20041800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2004/pdf/04-

24304.pdf.

The comment period deadline is Dec. 16. Comments may be e-mailed to nrcrep@nrc.gov or

mailed to Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, Office of Administration, Mail Stop T-6D59, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 20555-0001. Comments can also be delivered to

Two White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md., between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on

Federal workdays.

###
#### In the Matter of Hattie C. Goodhart, Respondent, against City Court of Yonkers, Sitting as a Court of Special Sessions, et al., Respondents, and Max Citterman, Appellant.

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to restrain the Court of Special Sessions of the City Court of Yonkers and Martin J. Fay, Judge of the City Court of Yonkers, sitting as a Magistrate of the said Court of Special Sessions, and the appellant Citterman from taking further proceedings upon the information filed in said court by said appellant .against respondent Goodhart, charging the latter with violation of the Building Code of the City of Yonkers, order unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [190 Mise. 572.] [See *post,*p. 967.]
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

FRANKLIN FINANCE CORPORATION

COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

Net income for net income per common share is computed by subtracting from the
applicable income the dividend requirements on preferred stock to arrive at
income applicable to common stock and dividing this amount by the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                        FOR THE YEARS ENDED
                                                                             DECEMBER 31,
                                                  -----------------------------------------------------------
                                                             2001               2000               1999
                                                  -----------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                               <C>                       <C>                <C>

INCOME
Net income                                                $ 3,092,256        $ 2,847,455         $ 2,467,247
Less: preferred stock dividend requirement                  1,800,900          1,800,900           1,800,900
                                                  -----------------------------------------------------------

Net income applicable to common stock                     $ 1,291,356        $ 1,046,555         $   666,347
                                                  ===========================================================

SHARES
Weighted average number of common shares                       22,077             22,077              22,077

NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE                               $     58.49        $     47.40         $     30.18


</TABLE>


                                       35
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Derrick Bernard Harden, Jr.

, * From the 42nd District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 28974A

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 1

- 00 1 79

- CR * September 16 , 20 2 1

The State of Texas

, * Per Curiam Memorand um Opinion

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal

should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion, the appeal

is dismissed

.
Exhibit 32



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Conceptus, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: November 14, 2003 |  | /s/ Mark M. Sieczkarek 
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                         |  | Mark M. Sieczkarek     
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer



---

Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Conceptus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: November 14, 2003 |  | /s/ Glen K. Furuta     
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                         |  | Glen K. Furuta         
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10(p)

                    Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement
                    ---------------------------------------

Reference is made to the Employment Agreement dated as of September 19, 1997
(the "Agreement"),  between United Rentals, Inc. (subsequently renamed United
Rentals (North America), Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and
Bradley S. Jacobs ("Executive").

The Company and Executive agree that the second sentence of paragraph 6(a)(iii)
of the Agreement is replaced in its entirety by the following new sentence:

     If this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this paragraph 6(a)(iii), the
     Company shall be obligated to pay to Executive a severance payment equal to
     13.51 times the sum of (x) the Executive's annual Base Salary in effect at
     the time of termination plus (y) the highest annual cash bonus (if any)
     paid by the Company to Executive during the three-year period preceding the
     date of termination; provided, however, that the aforesaid multiple shall
                          --------  -------
     be five (rather than 13.51) if such termination is either a result of
     Executive's death or a notice of termination due to Disability.

The Company and the Executive further agree that the words "unless it occurs
with Executive's express prior written consent" are deleted from the first
sentence of Paragraph 6(d).

     Except as specifically set forth above, the Agreement remains unmodified
and in full force and effect.


Dated: December 24, 1999


UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA), INC.


By:
    --------------------------------


------------------------------------
Bradley S. Jacobs
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             611
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   611
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     611
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              644
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,900
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,726
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       611
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,692
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,692)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,692)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         $40,455
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               253,573
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 294,028
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,490
<OTHER-SE>                                     282,538
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   294,028
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,713
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 60,502
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             60,502
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    60,502
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Not presented, as all shares of common stock are held
by a sole shareholder.
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jean Paul Roy,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for the periods presented.

















/s/ Jean
Paul Roy


------------------------





Jean Paul
Roy


President
and Chief Executive Officer


June 24,
2008
#### § 361.106 Fees.

No fees will be charged for obtaining a username, issuing an aluminum import license or accessing the aluminum import monitoring system.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

125 CA 13-00287 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

A&M GLOBAL MANAGEMENT CORP., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NORTHTOWN UROLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., JOHN M. ROEHMHOLDT AND JACEK T. SOSNOWSKI, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

HOGAN WILLIG, PLLC, AMHERST (ROBERT MICHALAK OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
DAMON MOREY LLP, BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. WILLETT OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT JOHN M. ROEHMHOLDT.
HURWITZ & FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (EARL K. CANTWELL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT JACEK T. SOSNOWSKI.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J.), entered December 11, 2012. The order, among other things, awarded defendant Jacek T. Sosnowski attorneys’ fees and costs against plaintiff.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion of defendant Jacek T. Sosnowski and vacating the award of attorneys’ fees and costs against plaintiff and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in A&M Global Mgt. Corp. v Northtown Urology Assoc., P.C. ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Mar. 28, 2014).

Entered: March 28, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned
officer of Global ePoint, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the Form 10-QSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|Date: November 18,
2003 | 
|                        | 
|                        | 



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Global ePoint, Inc. and will be retained by Global ePoint, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order filed September 29 , 2020

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00540

- CV

____________ FELIX P. BABAUTA , Appellant

V.

DEBRA V. JENNINGS AND RALPAHELL V. WILKINS , Appelle es

On Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris C ounty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 23475



### O R D E R

On Jul y 26, 20 20, thi s court issued an order stating that appellant must file a brief by Aug ust 17, 2020 or his appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution

. Appell ant did not fil e a brief an d inst e a d file d an objection to our order. Appellant ’ s objection is denied. Appel lant ’ s complaint s regarding the reporter ’ s record were overruled by the t rial court in its order dated June 28, 2018. If

appe llant stil l has complaints regarding t he record, he may present those in his brief on appeal.If a ppellant ’ s brief is no t before or on O c tober 20, 20 20, this appeal will be

dism i ssed f

or want of prosecution

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Spain , Hassan, and Poissant

.
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-01-047 November 26, 2001

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov 

 

NRC STAFF TO HOLD REGULATORY CONFERENCE WITH VIRGINIA POWER

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a regulatory conference with officials of

Virginia Power, operator of the Surry nuclear power plant near Surry, Virginia, this Friday (November 30).

The discussion will focus on an inspection finding with a preliminary determination of ìyellowî involving

the emergency diesel generators at the plant.

The meeting, which is open to public observation, will begin at 10:30 a.m. in the NRC Region II

offices located on the 24th floor at 61 Forsyth Street in Atlanta, Georgia. NRC officials will be available

after the meeting to answer any questions.

The NRC will discuss with Virginia Power an inspection finding with a preliminary determination

of "yellow," meaning it may have substantial safety significance. The finding was identified in an

inspection ending in late September and involves failed components in an emergency diesel generator

which is shared by the two units at the plant. The inspection finding appears to have substantial safety

significance because the components may have caused the generator to fail if it had been required to

operate for an extended period to mitigate accident scenarios involving the loss of offsite power.

 Using the agencyís significance determination process, NRC officials classify certain conditions

at nuclear power plants as being one of four colors which delineate increasing levels of safety significance,

beginning with green and progressing to white, yellow or red.

Two apparent violations, one involving the failure to promptly identify and correct the problem and

the other involving the failure to comply with the plantís Technical Specifications, are related to this

preliminary finding and are being considered for enforcement action. No decision on the violations, any

enforcement action, or the final significance determination of the inspection finding will be made at the

conference. Those decisions will be made later by NRC officials.

###