alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: November 20, 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR
- 2013 -0602 FROM: Rob Lawrence

EPA/Region 6/PD SUBJECT: June 18 , 2014 Call with the Oklahoma Secretary of Energy and the Environment

regarding the Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
**SUMMARY** A brief call was made by EPA to the Oklahoma Secretary of Energy and the Environment on J une 18 , 2014, to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants , which was proposed on June 2, 2014.
**ATTENDEES** Participant : Mike Teague (OK Secretary of Energy and the Environment ) EPA Participant : Ron Curry (Regional Administrator)
### §3809. Regulations

Within 180 days after the date of enactment of this chapter, each authority head shall promulgate rules and regulations necessary to implement the provisions of this chapter. Such rules and regulations shall—

(1) ensure that investigating officials and reviewing officials are not responsible for conducting the hearing required in section 3803(f) of this title, making the determinations required by subsections (f) and (h) of section 3803 of this title, or making collections under section 3806 of this title; and

(2) require a reviewing official to include in any notice required by section 3803(a)(2) of this title a statement which specifies that the reviewing official has determined that there is a reasonable prospect of collecting, from a person with respect to whom the reviewing official is referring allegations of liability in such notice, the amount for which such person may be liable.

(Added Pub. L. 99–509, title VI, §6103(a), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1947.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of enactment of this chapter, referred to in text, means the date of enactment of Pub. L. 99–509 which was approved Oct. 21, 1986.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         12,108
<SECURITIES>                                    3,938
<RECEIVABLES>                                      18
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,329
<PP&E>                                          2,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,722)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 17,902
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             728
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       63,570
<OTHER-SE>                                    (46,614)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   17,902
<SALES>                                            30
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   30
<CGS>                                              40
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,290
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (218)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,082)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,082)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        


</TABLE>
#### The Tredennick Company, Inc., Respondent, v. National Bridge Works, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### § 1200.1 Statement of purpose.

The Merit Systems Protection Board (the Board) is an independent Government agency that operates like a court. The Board was created to ensure that all Federal government agencies follow Federal merit systems practices. The Board does this by adjudicating Federal employee appeals of agency personnel actions, and by conducting special reviews and studies of Federal merit systems.

[56 FR 41747, Aug. 23, 1991, as amended at 59 FR 65233, Dec. 19, 1994]
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0186 - Options And Recommendations For NRC Deferring Active Regulation Of Ground-Water Protection At IN SITU Leach Uranium Extraction Facilities

Accession Number: ML031210615

Date Released: Tuesday, November 18, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML031210874 - SECY-03-0186 - Options And Recommendations For NRC Deferring Active Regulation Of Ground-Water Protection At IN SITU Leach Uranium Extraction Facilities (11 page(s), 10/29/2003)
    - ML011220371 - EPA/NRC meeting Summary  dated October 10, 2000. (6 page(s), 11/24/2000)
    - ML010340040 - NRC/EPA 12/21/2000  Meeting Summary on EPA'sUnderground Injection Control (5 page(s), 12/21/2000)
    - ML012190317 - MEETING SUMMARY, IN SITU LEACH PERMITTING STATES AND NRC MEETING OF JUNE 12, 2001. (7 page(s), 8/2/2001)
    - ML021970625 - Meeting Summary, IN SITU Leach Permitting States, EPA and NRC Meeting of June 11, 2002. (10 page(s), 7/16/2002)
    - ML022170202 - Review of meeting summary of the discussions that took place between several non-Agreement States, EPA and NRC on 06/11/2002 in Denver, CO. (1 page(s), 7/24/2002)
    - ML022390270 - Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Uranium In Situ Leach Operations. (1 page(s), 8/9/2002)
    - ML023230351 - Memoranda of Understanding on In Situ Leach Facilities. (2 page(s), 10/18/2002)
    - ML031210861 - SECY-03-0186 - Attachment F - Sample Memorandum of Understanding (5 page(s), 10/29/2003)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### §705. Purchase price of conveyed interest; installment payments

The Secretary of the Interior, prior to any conveyance under this chapter, shall determine the fair market value of the interest to be conveyed, exclusive of the value of any improvements placed on the lands involved by the applicant or his predecessors in interest. Said value shall be determined as of the date of appraisal. In establishing the purchase price to be paid by the applicant for the interest, the Secretary shall take into consideration any equities of the applicant and his predecessors in interest, including conditions of prior use and occupancy. In any event the purchase price for any interest conveyed shall not exceed its fair market value nor be less than $5 per acre. The Secretary may, in his discretion, allow payment to be made in installments.

(Pub. L. 87–851, §5, Oct. 23, 1962, 76 Stat. 1128.)
### SUBCHAPTER II—OIL POLLUTION OF COASTAL WATERS
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the filing of the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report onForm 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended November 26, 2005 (the“Report”) by Novamerican Steel Inc. (the “Company”), the undersigned, as theChief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to my knowledge:

 

•       the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

•       the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/  *Christopher H. Pickwoad*  |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  Christopher H. Pickwoad  |
|   | Title:  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 4.5  


 
 

CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF
  GMAC EDUCATION LOAN FUNDING TRUST-I    
  


        THIS
Certificate of Trust of GMAC Education Loan Funding Trust-I (the "Trust"), is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustee, to form a statutory
trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. Code, § 3801 et seq.) (the "Act"). 


        1.    Name.
The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is GMAC Education Loan Funding Trust-I. 



        2.    Delaware
Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware is Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square North, 1100 North Market
Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001, Attention: Corporate Trust Administration. 


        3.    Effective
Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing. 


        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a) of the Act. 



	 	 	WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, as Delaware Trustee
	

 	
 	

By:	

/s/  PATRICIA A. EVANS      
 Name: Patricia A. Evans

Title: Assistant Vice President





State
of Delaware

Secretary of State

Division of Corporations

Filed 10:30 AM 01/15/2003

030028936 - 3614612 









QuickLinks


CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF GMAC EDUCATION LOAN FUNDING TRUST-I
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Augustine, Alias John Hirschbock, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Kings county affirmed. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a)I, Jean Paul Roy, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of GeoGlobal Resources Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date: November 16, 2005 /s/ Jean Paul Roy   Jean Paul Roy   President and Chief Executive Officer   
Page 39
Editorial Note on Part 174
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 174 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93025, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 174.25 Application for further review. ( a ) *Form and number of copies.* An application for further review may be filed on the same Customs Form 19 used for filing the protest for which further review is requested, or on a separate Customs Form 19. In either case, the Customs Form 19 shall be filed in quadruplicate. If a fifth copy of the application is presented for the purpose of having recorded thereon the date of its receipt, such information shall be recorded thereon and the fifth copy shall be returned to the person filing the application.
( b ) *Contents.* An application for further review shall contain the following information: ( 1 ) Information identifying the protest to which it applies and the protesting party and his importer number;
( 2 ) Allegations that the protesting party: ( i ) Has not previously received an adverse administrative decision from the Commissioner of Customs or his designee nor has presently pending an application for an administrative decision on the same claim with respect to the same category of merchandise; and
( ii ) Has not received a final adverse decision from the Customs courts on the same claim with respect to the same category of merchandise and does not have an action involving such a claim pending before the Customs courts.
( 3 ) A statement of any facts or additional legal arguments, not part of the record, upon which the protesting party relies, including the criterion set forth in § 174.24 which justifies further review. A showing of facts that support the allegation of a criterion set forth in § 174.24(c) will constitute a ground for the granting of further review in circumstances where the applicant's inability to affirmatively make the allegations described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section would otherwise result in its denial.
[T.D. 70-81, 35 FR 13429, Aug. 22, 1970, as amended by T.D. 78-99, 43 FR 13062, Mar. 29, 1978]
Speed Control:

(i) Calculate the theoretical instantaneous force at the wheels, FRi using equation 2. 

d i

i

k T FR

r



 Eq. 2

(ii) Calculate the instantaneous vehicle acceleration using equation 3 of this section.

 

2

i i i

i

FR A B S C S

a

M

    

 Eq. 3

(iii) Use equation 4 of this section to calculate the vehicle speed target.

S S i i  -1 att i   i i-1  Eq. 4

(iv) Use equation 5 to calculate the transmission output shaft angular speed target from vehicle speed 

target.

i d

nrefi 2

S k f

 r





 

Eq. 5

Torque Control:

(i) Used the measured transmission output shaft speed to calculate the vehicle speed.

n

d

2

i

r f S

k

   



(ii) Calculate total road load force using the following equation.

 

2 FRi i M a A B i i       S C S

(iii) Using the total road load force use the following equation to calculate the transmission output 

torque setpoint.

i

refi

d

r FR

T

k



 Eq. §1037.550-6

Where:

FR = total road load force to be applied at the surface of the roll. The total force is the sum of the 

individual tractive forces applied at each roll surface.

i = a counter to indicate a point in time over the driving schedule. For a dynamometer operating at 10-

Hz intervals over a 600-second driving schedule, the maximum value of i is 6,000.
A = constant value representing the vehicle’s frictional load in lbf or newtons. See subpart C of this part.

B = coefficient representing load from drag and rolling resistance, which are a function of vehicle speed, 

in lbf/mph or newtons/kph. See subpart C of this part.

S = linear speed at the roll surfaces as measured by the dynamometer, in mph or kph. Let Si-1 = 0.

C = coefficient representing aerodynamic effects, which are a function of vehicle speed squared, in 

lbf/mph2or newton/kph2.

M = mass of vehicle in lbm or kg. Determine the vehicle’s mass based on the test weight, taking into 

account the effect of rotating axles, as specified in §1066.404 dividing the weight by the acceleration 

due to gravity as specified in 40 CFR 1065.630 consistent with good engineering judgment.

t = elapsed time in the driving schedule as measured by the dynamometer, in seconds. Let ti-1 = 0.

fn = measured angular speed of transmission output shaft.

fnref = reference angular speed of transmission output shaft.

T = measured torque at the transmission output shaft.

Tref= reference torque at the transmission output shaft.

r = radius of loaded tire.

kd = final drive ratio.

S = linear speed of the test cycle.
#### § 1210.16 Intervenors and amici curiae.

Intervenors and amici curiae are permitted to participate in proceedings under this part as allowed in § 1201.34 of this chapter. Motions to intervene and requests to participate as an amicus curiae must be filed at the earliest possible time, generally before the initial status conference. All intervenors and amici curiae must comply with the expedited procedures set forth in this part and all orders issued by the administrative judge. The deadlines applicable to the timely adjudication of cases under this part will not be extended to accommodate intervenors or amici curiae.
§ 1820.18 Restrictions that apply to testimony. ( a ) The General Counsel may impose conditions or restrictions on OSC employee testimony including, for example: ( 1 ) Limiting the areas of testimony;
( 2 ) Requiring the requestor and other parties to the legal proceeding to agree that the transcript of the testimony will be kept under seal;
( 3 ) Requiring that the transcript will be used or made available only in the particular legal proceeding for which testimony was requested.
( b ) OSC may offer the employee's written declaration in lieu of testimony.
( c ) If authorized to testify under this part, employees may testify as to facts within their personal knowledge, but, unless specifically authorized to do so by the General Counsel, the employee shall not: ( 1 ) Reveal confidential or privileged information; or
( 2 ) For a current OSC employee, testify as an expert or opinion witness with regard to any matter arising out of the employee's official duties or the functions of OSC unless testimony is being given on behalf of the United States (see also 5 CFR 2635.805).
( d ) The scheduling of an employee's testimony, including the amount of time that the employee will be made available for testimony, will be subject to OSC's approval.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
 AGENCY: Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Administration for Children and Families, Department of Health and Human Services.
 ACTION: Biennial publication of allotment percentages for States under the Title IV-B subpart 1, Child Welfare Services State Grants Program.
 SUMMARY: As required by section 421(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 621(c)), the Department is publishing the allotment percentage for each State under the Title IV-B subpart 1, Child Welfare Services State Grants Program. Under section 421(a), the allotment percentages are one of the factors used in the computation of the Federal grants awarded under the Program.
 EFFECTIVE DATE: The allotment percentages shall be effective for Fiscal Years 2006 and 2007.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris Lee, Grants Fiscal Management Specialist, Office of Grants Management, Office of Administration, Administration for Children and Families, telephone (202) 205-4626.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The allotment percentage for each State is determined on the basis of paragraphs (b) and (c) of section 421 of the Act. These figures are available on the ACF home page on the Internet: 
                    *http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/​programs/​cb/​.*
                     The allotment percentage for each State is as follows: State
Allotment percentageAlabama
58.78Alaska
47.24Arizona
57.42Arkansas
61.90California
46.47Colorado
45.19Connecticut
31.13Delaware
48.21District of Columbia
30.00Florida
51.94Georgia
53.36Hawaii
51.93Idaho
58.99Illinois
46.53Indiana
54.64Iowa
54.61Kansas
53.08Kentucky
58.79Louisiana
59.22Maine
54.86Maryland
41.44Massachusetts
36.69Michigan
51.78Minnesota
46.01Mississippi
63.49Missouri
53.96Montana
59.82Nebraska
52.37Nevada
50.48New Hampshire
44.95New Jersey
36.08New Mexico
60.09New York
41.97North Carolina
55.13North Dakota
56.01Ohio
52.85Oklahoma
58.07Oregon
53.45Pennsylvania
49.80Rhode Island
50.10South Carolina
58.79South Dakota
55.37Tennessee
55.42Texas
53.07Utah
60.24Vermont
51.92Virginia
46.92Washington
47.22West Virginia
61.73Wisconsin
51.48Wyoming
49.48American Samoa
70.00Guam
70.00N. Mariana Islands
70.00Puerto Rico
70.00Virgin Islands
70.00
 Dated: October 20, 2004. Joan E. Ohl, Commissioner, Administration on Children, Youth and Families.


[FR Doc. 04-24350 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
R9E

23
t 26
1 &
Ss
7
35
¥
y
rey
Sl
S|
[*}
PB PB39 V
I
I
HE HES|
Cooper Spur ESTA Veo -— 1 153 1-1
5 Ski Area ma sa |
3 ZF -
a id & AF yy a <
9 10
+ T
; 2
g s
PBA
A8i
H 9 o/d /"
\ I
BaP SSSI t
. A \ i)
WW idd ern S79)!
om
ROE
Legend

VA) Crystal Springs Watershed 650
Special Resources
Management Unit

Forest Service Administered Land
Road Number ___
US Forest Service

630 Forest Service

T_—1 Crystal Springs Zone of Trail Number Private or Other
Contribution -
Highway
(MO Existing USFS Wilderness
Area Road
---— Trail
Stream

Mo6-02-07

0.8 1Mile

1Kilometer

Mount Hood
National
Forest

OREGON

Crystal Springs Watershed Special Resources Management
i Mniti-dfine 2006

GPO,

This product was compiled from various S
sources and may be corrected, updated,
modified, or replaced at any time.