alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MARTIN MAHON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1073

[May 23, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Dennis D. Bailey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14-

014767CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine N. Austin, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. 

Folley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Order entered April 7, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01121-CV

CLARKE BARCUS, C-2-IT RENTAL, INC., 440 EQUIPMENT, LLC AND 

CYRUS BARCUS, Appellants

V.

SARAH SCHARBAUER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. Dc-17-08105

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ April 3, 2020 unopposed second motion to 

extend time to file their brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be 

filed no later than April 21, 2020.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
### §2346. Project administration

#### (a) Project tracking

The Secretary shall assign a unique tracking number to each water resources project under the jurisdiction of the Secretary to be used by each Federal agency throughout the life of the project.

#### (b) Report repository

#### (1) In general

The Secretary shall provide to the Library of Congress a copy of each final feasibility study, final environmental impact statement, final reevaluation report, final post-authorization change report, record of decision, and report to Congress prepared by the Corps of Engineers.

#### (2) Availability to public

Each document described in paragraph (1) shall be made available to the public, and an electronic copy of each document shall be made permanently available to the public through the Internet.

(Pub. L. 110–114, title II, §2041, Nov. 8, 2007, 121 Stat. 1100; Pub. L. 114–322, title I, §1136(b), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1657.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2016—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 114–322 inserted "final post-authorization change report," after "final reevaluation report,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 2 of Pub. L. 110–114, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
#### In the Matter of Philip S. Saitta.

Respondent disbarred. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 30, 2014

d1215 

# Order

Clerk December 30, 2014

148425

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148425

COA: 315520

Wayne CC: 76

- 005890

- FC

CHARLES LEWIS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 29, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, b ecause we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Lefstein & Rosenfeld Company, Appellant, v. Henry J. Hunt, Respondant.

Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Present—Jenks, . P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
### §2710. Indemnification agreements

#### (a) Agreements not prohibited

Nothing in this Act prohibits any agreement to insure, hold harmless, or indemnify a party to such agreement for any liability under this Act.

#### (b) Liability not transferred

No indemnification, hold harmless, or similar agreement or conveyance shall be effective to transfer liability imposed under this Act from a responsible party or from any person who may be liable for an incident under this Act to any other person.

#### (c) Relationship to other causes of action

Nothing in this Act, including the provisions of subsection (b), bars a cause of action that a responsible party subject to liability under this Act, or a guarantor, has or would have, by reason of subrogation or otherwise, against any person.

(Pub. L. 101–380, title I, §1010, Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 498.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 101–380, Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 484, known as the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2701 of this title and Tables.
#### Commissioner of Welfare of the City of New York, Respondent, v. Richard O’Connor, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001047166
<NAME> United Rentals (North America), Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          20,410
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  274,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                    41,201
<INVENTORY>                                     70,994
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,721,445
<DEPRECIATION>                                 407,902
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,603,470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,314,574
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,021,352
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,603,470
<SALES>                                      1,220,282
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,220,282
<CGS>                                          226,174
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  796,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (5,097)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                22,530
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,157
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 86,906
<INCOME-TAX>                                    46,971
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             39,935
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 21,337
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,598
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 294.108 Procedures for obtaining records. ( a ) *Mailing or delivering a request.* Any person may ask for records under section 552 of title 5, United States Code, by directing a letter to one of the organizations listed in § 294.107, or by delivering a request in person at the addresses listed in that section during business hours on a regular business day.
( b ) *Proper marking.* Each request for records should have a clear and prominent notation on the first page, such as “Freedom of Information Act Request.” In addition, if sent by mail or otherwise submitted in an envelope or other cover, mark the outside clearly and prominently with “FOIA Request” or “Freedom of Information Act Request.”
( c ) *Contents of request letter.* A request must describe the records sought in sufficient detail to enable OPM personnel to locate the records with a reasonable amount of effort. ( 1 ) OPM will regard a request for a specific category of records as fulfilling the requirements of this paragraph, if it enables responsive records to be identified by a technique or process that is not unreasonably burdensome or disruptive to OPM operations.
( 2 ) Whenever possible, a request should include specific information about each record sought, such as the date, number, title or name, author, recipient, and subject matter of the record.
( 3 ) If an OPM organization determines that a request does not reasonably describe the records sought, it will either provide notice of any additional information needed or otherwise state why the request is insufficient. OPM will also offer the record seeker an opportunity to confer, with the objective of reformulating the request so that it meets the requirements of this section.
( d ) *Medical records.* OPM or another Government agency may disclose the medical records of an applicant, employee, or annuitant to the subject of the record, or to a representative designated in writing. However, medical records may contain information about an individual's mental or physical condition that a prudent physician would hesitate to give to the individual. Under such circumstances, OPM may disclose the records, including the exact nature and probable outcome of the condition, only to a licensed physician designated in writing for that purpose by the individual or his or her designated representative.
( e ) *Publications.* If the subject matter of a request includes material published and offered for sale (e.g., by the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office), OPM will explain where a person may review and/or purchase the publications.
( f ) *Responses within 10 working days.* Except in unusual circumstances (as defined in 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(B)), OPM will determine whether to disclose or deny records within 10 working days after receipt of the request (excluding weekends and holidays) and will provide notice immediately of its determination and the reasons therefor, and of the right to appeal any adverse determination.
[54 FR 25094, June 13, 1989, as amended at 58 FR 32044, June 8, 1993]
### §21. Bayou Cocodrie, Louisiana

Bayou Cocodrie, from its source to its junction with Bayou Chicot, in the State of Louisiana, is declared to be not a navigable water of the United States within the meaning of the laws enacted by the Congress for the preservation and protection of such waters.

The right to alter, amend, or repeal this section is expressly reserved.

(Feb. 25, 1921, ch. 71, §§1, 2, 41 Stat. 1145.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The first sentence hereof is section 1 and the second sentence section 2 of act Feb. 25, 1921, entitled "An Act to declare Bayou Cocodrie nonnavigable from its source to its junction with Bayou Chicot".
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Heavy-Duty Hybrid Onboard Diagnostics

FROM: Amy Kopin

TO: The Docket

DATE: July 21, 2011

On June 23rd, 2011 we held a conference call with the Hybrid Manufacturers Regulatory

Collaboration (HMRC) to discuss concerns raised by members of the HMRC regarding heavyduty onboard diagnostic (OBD) requirements and timing. Concerns were raised during the

comment period for the heavy-duty greenhouse gas notice of proposed rulemaking that heavyduty hybrid applications may not be able to meet the 2013 heavy-duty OBD regulations that were 

published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking.1,2 Specifically, they have requested a delay of the 

application of HD OBD requirements for hybrid applications until 2020. Attendees from the 

EPA and HMRC are shown below.

Attendee Affiliation

Cleophas Jackson EPA – Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division

Anthony Neam EPA – Assessment and Standards Division

Amy Kopin EPA – Assessment and Standards Division

Barbara Chance Allison Transmission

Kevin Rodgers Allison Transmission

Rob Merrion Allison Transmission

Steve Spurlin Allison Transmission

Justin Owens Allison Transmission

Ian McKenzie Eaton Corporation

Tom Apalenek BAE Systems

Derek Matthews BAE Systems

Dan Butler BAE Systems

Doug Thrall BAE Systems

Jim Lyons Sierra Research

 

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Mediumand Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished December 29, 2010. Available here: 

http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-12-29/html/2010-32726.htm

2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule 

Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic Systems on 2010 and Later Heavy-Duty Engines Used in Highway 

Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy-Duty 

Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd-obd-frm-02-24-09-notice-74-fr-8310.pdf

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION
### §382. Seizure of piratical vessels generally

The President is authorized to instruct the commanders of the public armed vessels of the United States to subdue, seize, take, and send into any port of the United States, any armed vessel or boat, or any vessel or boat, the crew whereof shall be armed, and which shall have attempted or committed any piratical aggression, search, restraint, depredation, or seizure, upon any vessel of the United States, or of the citizens thereof, or upon any other vessel; and also to retake any vessel of the United States, or its citizens, which may have been unlawfully captured upon the high seas.

(R.S. §4294.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §4294 derived from acts Mar. 3, 1819, ch. 77, §2, 3 Stat. 512; Jan. 30, 1823, ch. 7, 3 Stat. 721.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 14, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq*. (“the Act”), the Packaging Machinery Manufacturers Institute, Inc. (“PMMI”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Packaging Machinery Manufacturers Institute, Inc., Arlington, VA. The nature and scope of PMMI's standards development activities are: Safety standards with respect to the construction, care, and use of packaging and packaging-related converting machinery. 

Additional information may be obtained from Charles F. Hayes, Director of Technical Services for the Packaging Machinery Manufacturers Institute, Inc.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-24569  Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132180 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

RONALD G. HAAER and DAWN L. RHODES, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Justices 

v SC: 132180 

 COA: 260001 

Ingham CC: 03-001767-CZ

VREBA-HOFF DAIRY DEVELOPMENT,

L.L.C., VREBA-HOFF HOLDINGS, L.L.C.,

VAN BAKEL EXPLOITATIEMIJ B. V., JOHN 

VANDER HOFF, WILHELM VAN BAKEL, and 

MENNO WAGLER,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 17, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
|                                                          |   | Subsidiaries           |   |                               |   |              |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|-------------------|--------|
| Legal Name                                                    |   | Place of Incorporation |   | Doing Business As        |   | Ownership %1 |   |
|                                                          |   |                   |   |                               |   |              |   |
| Lan Argentina S.A.                                            |   | Argentina              |   | Lan Argentina                      |   |              | 99     | % |
| Aerolinhas Brasileras S.A.                                    |   | Brazil                 |   | ABSA                               |   |              | 73.3   | % |
| Inmobiliaria Aeronáutica S.A.                            |   | Chile                  |   | Inmobiliaria Aeronáutica |   |              | 100    | % |
| Inversiones Lan S.A.                                          |   | Chile                  |   | Inverlan                           |   |              | 99.7   | % |
| Lan Cargo S.A.                                                |   | Chile                  |   | Lan Chile Cargo          |   |              | 99.89  | % |
| Lan Pax Group S.A.                                            |   | Chile                  |   | Lan Pax Group                      |   |              | 100    | % |
| Transporte Aéreo S.A.                                    |   | Chile                  |   | LanExpress                         |   |              | 100    | % |
| Aerolane, Líneas Aéreas Nacionales del Ecuador S.A. |   | Ecuador                |   | Lan Ecuador                        |   |              | 71.92  | % |
| Aerotransporte Mas de Carga S.A.                              |   | Mexico                 |   | Mas Air                            |   |              | 69.15  | % |
| Lan Perú S.A.                                            |   | Peru                   |   | Lan Perú                      |   |              | 70     | % |
| Comercial Masterhouse SA                                      |   | Chile                  |   | Comercial Masterhouse              |   |              | 100    | % |
| Linea Aerea Nacional Chile S.A.                               |   | Chile                  |   | Lan Chile                          |   |              | 100    | % |
| Línea Aérea Carguera de Colombia                    |   | Colombia               |   | LANCO                              |   |              | 90     | % |
| Aerovías de Integración Regional S.A.               |   | Colombia               |   | Aires                              |   |              | 94.99  | % |

----

| 1 | Percentage of equity owned by Lan Airlines S.A. directly or indirectly through subsidiaries or affiliates |
|---|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-05-010 March 14, 2005

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

HOEG NAMED NRC SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR 

AT ST. LUCIE NUCLEAR PLANT

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials at the Region II office in Atlanta have assigned

Tim Hoeg as the senior resident inspector at the St. Lucie nuclear power plant near Jensen Beach, Fla. 

Hoeg had been the senior resident inspector for four years at the Grand Gulf nuclear power plant near

Port Gibson, Miss.

Before being assigned to Grand Gulf, Hoeg worked as a resident inspector for three years at

Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant near Saint Leonard, Md. He joined the NRC in March 1997 as a

reactor engineer in the NRC’s Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa. Prior to joining the NRC, Hoeg

worked as a nuclear system engineer for Public Service Electric and Gas Company at its Salem

Generating Station near Salem, N.J. He also worked as a shift test engineer for General Dynamics

Electric Boat Division in Groton, Conn. He also served in the United States Navy.

Hoeg received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Florida Atlantic

University in Boca Raton.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They

serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring

significant work projects, and interfacing with plant personnel and the public.

Hoeg joins NRC resident inspector Steve Sanchez and site secretary Laura Orr at the St. Lucie

office where they can be reached by calling 772-464-7822. 

###
### §457. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 457 was editorially reclassified as section 30146 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
#### Andrew Kulinski, Respondent, v. Edward Wegler et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor, P. J., and McCurn, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and for granting a new trial as to defendants Wegler and Knapp. (Appeals from a judgment for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denied a motion for a new trial.) Present— Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.