alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1529

AN ACT

To amend title 11 of the United States Code with

respect to the dismissal of certain involuntarycases.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1529

AN ACT

To amend title 11 of the United States Code with respect

to the dismissal of certain involuntary cases.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1529 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Involuntary Bank3 ruptcy Improvement Act of 2003’’.

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

5 Section 303 of title 11, United States Code, is

6 amended by adding at the end the following:

7 ‘‘(l)(1) If—

8 ‘‘(A) the petition under this section is false or

9 contains any materially false, fictitious, or fraudu10 lent statement;

11 ‘‘(B) the debtor is an individual; and

12 ‘‘(C) the court dismisses such petition;

13 the court, upon motion of the debtor, shall expunge from

14 the records of the court such petition, all the records relat15 ing to such petition in particular, and all references to

16 such petition.

17 ‘‘(2) If the debtor is an individual and the court dis18 misses a petition under this section, the court may enter

19 an order prohibiting all consumer reporting agencies (as

20 defined in section 603 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act)

21 from making any consumer report (as defined in section

22 603 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act) that contains any
3

•HR 1529 EH

1 information relating to such petition or to the case com2 menced by the filing of such petition.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 1205.32 Decision on appeal. ( a ) The Chairman will decide the appeal within 30 workdays unless the Chairman determines that there is good cause for extension of that deadline. If an appeal is improperly labeled, does not contain the necessary information, or is submitted to an inappropriate official, the time period for processing that appeal will begin when the Chairman receives the appeal and the necessary information.
( b ) If the request for amendment of a record is granted on appeal, the Chairman will direct that the amendment be made. A copy of the amended record will be provided to the requester.
( c ) If the request for amendment of a record is denied, the Chairman will notify the requester of the denial and will inform the requester of: ( 1 ) The basis for the denial;
( 2 ) The right to judicial review of the decision under 5 U.S.C. 552a(g)(1)(A); and
( 3 ) The right to file a concise statement with the Board stating the reasons why the requester disagrees with the denial. This statement will become a part of the requester's record.
### §643. "Exploration" defined

As used in this chapter, the term "exploration" means the search for new or unexplored deposits of minerals, including related development work, within the United States, its Territories and possessions, whether conducted from the surface or underground, using recognized and sound procedures including standard geophysical and geochemical methods for obtaining mineralogical and geological information.

(Pub. L. 85–701, §3, Aug. 21, 1958, 72 Stat. 701.)
### §6544. Substitute reporters of debates and expert transcribers; temporary reporters of debates and expert transcribers; payments from Senate contingent fund

The Secretary of the Senate is on and after June 5, 1981, authorized to employ, by contract or otherwise, substitute reporters of debates and expert transcribers at daily rates of compensation, or temporary reporters of debates and expert transcribers at annual rates of compensation; no temporary reporters of debates or expert transcribers may be employed under authority of this provision for more than ninety days in any fiscal year; and payments made under authority of this section shall be made from the contingent fund of the Senate upon vouchers approved by the Secretary of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 89–90, July 27, 1965, 79 Stat. 266; Pub. L. 97–12, title I, §105, June 5, 1981, 95 Stat. 61.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 126b of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

"On and after June 5, 1981" substituted in text for "hereafter", which probably meant after the date of enactment of Pub. L. 97–12 rather than the date of enactment of Pub. L. 89–90.

#### Amendments

1981—Pub. L. 97–12 amended section generally, substituting "authorized to employ, by contract or otherwise, substitute reporters of debates and expert transcribers at daily rates of compensation, or temporary reporters of debates and expert transcribers at annual rates of compensation; no temporary reporters of debates or expert transcribers may be employed under authority of this provision for more than ninety days in any fiscal year; and payments made under authority of this section shall be made from the contingent fund of the Senate upon vouchers approved by the Secretary of the Senate" for "authorized to obtain by contract or otherwise, emergency reporters and transcribers as may be necessary, payments therefor to be made form the contingent fund of the Senate".
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov 

No. III-02-005 March 25, 2002

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT CO. MARCH 26 TO DISCUSS 

MONTICELLO NUCLEAR POWER PLANT PERFORMANCE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Nuclear

Management Company in Monticello, Minnesota, on Tuesday, March 26, to discuss the results of the

agency's annual assessment of safety performance at the Monticello Nuclear Power Plant. The facility

is located in Monticello.

The meeting, which will be the open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 1

p.m. in the Xcel Energy Training Center, 2100 West River Street, Monticello. Before the meeting is

concluded, NRC officials will answer any questions from members of the public.

The performance period to be discussed is April 1 through December 31 of last year.

A letter sent from the NRC Region III office to Nuclear Management Company addresses plant

performance during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on

the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/mont_2001q4.pdf

Current performance information for Monticello is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/MONT/mont_chart.html

# # #
Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 89 FR 20832, Mar. 25, 2024.

§ 351.410 Differences in circumstances of sale ( a ) *Introduction.* In calculating normal value the Secretary may make adjustments to account for certain differences in the circumstances of sales in the United States and foreign markets. (*See* section 773(a)(6)(C)(iii) of the Act.) This section clarifies certain terms used in the statute regarding circumstances of sale adjustments and describes the adjustment when commissions are paid only in one market.
( b ) *In general.* With the exception of the allowance described in paragraph (e) of this section concerning commissions paid in only one market, the Secretary will make circumstances of sale adjustments under section 773(a)(6)(C)(iii) of the Act only for direct selling expenses and assumed expenses.
( c ) *Direct selling expenses.* “Direct selling expenses” are expenses, such as commissions, credit expenses, guarantees, and warranties, that result from, and bear a direct relationship to, the particular sale in question.
( d ) *Assumed expenses.* Assumed expenses are selling expenses that are assumed by the seller on behalf of the buyer, such as advertising expenses.
( e ) *Commissions paid in one market.* The Secretary normally will make a reasonable allowance for other selling expenses if the Secretary makes a reasonable allowance for commissions in one of the markets under considerations, and no commission is paid in the other market under consideration. The Secretary will limit the amount of such allowance to the amount of the other selling expenses incurred in the one market or the commissions allowed in the other market, whichever is less.
( f ) *Reasonable allowance.* In deciding what is a reasonable allowance for any difference in circumstances of sale, the Secretary normally will consider the cost of such difference to the exporter or producer but, if appropriate, may also consider the effect of such difference on the market value of the merchandise.
<PAGE>   1
PLANET POLYMER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.                                   EXHIBIT 11.1
STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Three months ended            Nine months ended
                                                           September 30,                 September 30,
                                                     ------------------------      ------------------------
                                                       1999           1998           1999           1998
                                                     ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------
<S>                                                  <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Shares outstanding at beginning of period            5,300,144      5,300,144      5,300,144      5,300,144
    10,169 shares issued on March 15, 1998              10,169         10,169         10,169          7,413
    8,695 shares issued on June 15, 1998                 8,695          8,695          8,695          3,408
    13,483 shares issued on September 15, 1998          13,483          2,198         13,483            740
    8,571 shares issued on December 15, 1998             8,571             --          8,571             --
                                                     ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------
Weighted average number of shares                    5,341,062      5,321,206      5,341,062      5,311,705
                                                                    =========                     =========
    1,000,000 shares issued on January 11, 1999      1,000,000                       959,707
    9,677 shares issued on March 15, 1999                9,677                         7,054
    5,000 shares issued on March 30, 1999                5,000                         3,370
    9,677 shares issued on June 15, 1999                 9,677                         3,793
    5,106 shares issued on September 15, 1999              833                           281
                                                     ---------                     ---------
Weighted average number of shares                    6,366,249                     6,315,267
                                                     =========                     =========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                 [LETTERHEAD]



                                                              April 1, 1998


Mr. Steve Kircher, Program Manager
Envirotest Systems Corporation
1619 Elm Hill Pike, Suite A
Nashville, TN 37210


Dear Mr. Kricher:

The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee is 
hereby notifying Envirotest Systems Corporation of its intent to continue 
operation of the vehicle inspection and maintenance program in Nashville and 
Davidson County, Tennessee through June 30, 2001.

If you have any question or require any further assistance, please contact 
Mr. Harry Dugan of my staff at 340-5656.


                                           Very truly yours,


                                           /s/ G. Brent Hager
                                           G. Brent Hager, Ph.D., P.E., Director
                                           Bureau of Environmental Services


GBH/jk

cc: Harry Dugan
    Director, Vehicle Inspection
#### Richard Schnibbe, Respondent, v. Hauck Manufacturing Company, Defendant, Oscar A. Lewis, as Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Appellant.

Motion for reargument denied, without costs; Present—Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 1997
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S 1997 FORM
10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          33,487
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,511
<ALLOWANCES>                                       540
<INVENTORY>                                     25,857
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,464
<PP&E>                                          69,842
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,523
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           158
<OTHER-SE>                                      96,166
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,524
<SALES>                                        159,174
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               159,174
<CGS>                                           98,772
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,772
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                62,661
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,005)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,813
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (21,048)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,861
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,861
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.57
        

</TABLE>
Order entered August 19, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00113
- CV ALLEGHENY MILLWORK, INC. , Appellant

V. JEFF HONEYCUTT D/B/A NOAH QUALITY SERVICES , Appel lee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380
- 03386
- 2018

O RDER Befor e the Court is appellee’s August 17, 2021 unopposed motion for
extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than September 16, 2021

. Because the brief was first due July 19, 2021, we caution appellee that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

Board of Directors
Community First Bancorporation

         We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  into the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-71401) filed by Community First Bancorporation in
connection  with the Community First  Bancorporation  1998 Stock Option Plan and
into the Registration  Statement on Form S-8 (No.  333-66097) filed by Community
First  Bancorporation in connection with the Community First Bancorporation 1989
Stock Option Plan, of our Report dated  February 9, 2001,  included in Community
First Bancorporation's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2000.

                                             s/Donald G. Jones and Company, P.A.


Columbia, South Carolina
March 27, 2001
§ 1830.6 Appeals. ( a ) *Appeals of adverse determinations.* A requestor may appeal a denial of a Privacy Act request for access to or amendment of records to OSC's Office of General Counsel. The appeal must be in writing and be sent: ( 1 ) *By email to: foiarequest@osc.gov ;* or
( 2 ) *By mail to:* U.S. Office of Special Counsel, Office of General Counsel, 1730 M Street NW, Suite 218, Washington, DC 20036-4505.
( 3 ) The appeal must be received by the Office of General Counsel within 45 calendar days of the date of the letter denying the request. Both the appeal letter and envelope or email should be clearly marked “Privacy Act Appeal.” An appeal is considered received by OSC when it reaches the Office of General Counsel. The appeal letter may include as much or as little related information as the requestor wishes, as long as it clearly identifies OSC's determination (including the assigned request number, if known) being appealed. An appeal ordinarily will not be acted on if the request becomes a matter of litigation.
( b ) *Responses to appeals.* OSC's decision on an appeal will be made in writing. A final determination will be issued within 20 business days—unless OSC shows good cause to extend the 20-day period.
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93021, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 151.8 Examination after assembly. ( a ) *Application by importer.* Upon application by the importer, machinery, altars, shrines, and other articles which must be set up or assembled prior to examination may be examined at the mill, factory, or other suitable place after being assembled.
( b ) *Conditions applicable.* The importer shall comply with the conditions set forth in § 151.7 (b) through (d). The port director may also require that a deposit be made of the estimated additional expense. The packages need not be corded and sealed in accordance with § 151.7(a), but the port director may make such preliminary examination as he deems necessary to identify the merchandise with the invoice.
( c ) *Removal of merchandise and notification of assembly.* After the bond required by § 151.7(d) has been filed and any necessary preliminary examination has been made, the port director may permit the merchandise to be removed to the place at which it is to be assembled for examination. Within 90 days after such removal, unless an extension has been applied for and granted by the port director, the importer shall notify the port director that the merchandise has been assembled and is ready for examination, whereupon final examination shall be made.
#### Harry B. Chalmers, Respondent, v. Franklin Murphy and Another, Appellants, Impleaded with Others.

- Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER I—CREDIT AND MONETARY EXPANSION
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Multimedia Games, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gordon T. Graves, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, that, based on my knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Gordon T. Graves



Gordon T. Graves

Chief Executive Officer

February 14, 2003



-32-
### §1516. Exemptions

An official designated in section 1513 of this title to make apportionments may exempt from apportionment—

(1) a trust fund or working fund if an expenditure from the fund has no significant effect on the financial operations of the United States Government;

(2) a working capital fund or a revolving fund established for intragovernmental operations;

(3) receipts from industrial and power operations available under law; and

(4) appropriations made specifically for—

(A) interest on, or retirement of, the public debt;

(B) payment of claims, judgments, refunds, and drawbacks;

(C) items the President decides are of a confidential nature;

(D) payment under a law requiring payment of the total amount of the appropriation to a designated payee; and

(E) grants to the States under the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 301 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 931.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1516 | 31:665(f)(1). | R.S. §3679(f)(1); Mar. 3, 1905, ch. 1484, §4(1st par.), 33 Stat. 1257; Feb. 27, 1906, ch. 510, §3, 34 Stat. 48; restated Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 896, §1211, 64 Stat. 767. |

In the section, before clause (1), the word "apportionments" is substituted for "apportionments and reapportionments" because of section 1512(a)(last sentence) of the revised title. In subclause (D), the word "law" is substituted for "private relief acts or other laws" to eliminate unnecessary words.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Social Security Act, referred to in par. (4)(E), is act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, 49 Stat. 620, which is classified generally to chapter 7 (§301 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1305 of Title 42 and Tables.