alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §110. Regulations

The President shall prescribe regulations, and issue orders, necessary to organize, discipline, and govern the National Guard.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 600.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 110 | 32:17. | June 3, 1916, ch. 134, §118, 39 Stat. 213. |

The word "rules" is omitted as covered by the word "regulations". The words "National Guard" are substituted for the words "the militia provided for in this title". The words "for the thorough" are omitted as surplusage.
EXHIBIT 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Jerome E. Natoli, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of NexPrise, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
March 29, 2004    By: /s/ Jerome E. Natoli
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            70,898
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 102,909
<CASH>                                          19,070
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               4,385
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         181,494
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,489,756
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 74,371
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              1,021
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,171,938
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,500
<COMMON>                                         4,502
<OTHER-SE>                                     196,772
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,489,756
<PREMIUMS>                                       7,092
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              4,983
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               1,051
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      11,619
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     10,031
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            30,458
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,679
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,333)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,346
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,346
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-121 September 30, 2004

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON MEDICAL USES OF ISOTOPES 

TO HOLD A TELECONFERENCE OCT. 5

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Medical Uses of Isotopes will

hold a public teleconference Oct. 5 from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. to discuss recommendations to add a

minimum number of training hours to the alternative training pathway for Authorized Nuclear

Pharmacist status and Authorized User status.

Any member of the public wishing to participate in the teleconference must contact Angela

McIntosh, at 301-415-5030 or arm@nrc.gov for the phone number and pass code. The transcript and

written comments will be available on the NRC’s Web site, at www.nrc.gov and through the NRC

Public Document Room on or about Nov. 12, 2004. Minutes will be available on or about Dec. 17,

2004. 

# # #
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
  Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 
 As
Adopted Pursuant to
 
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Imagin Molecular Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Joseph G.
Oliverio, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
  (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
  (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 Dated: April
      15, 2009
                  /s/ Joseph G. OliverioJoseph
      G. OliverioChief
      Executive Officer
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Imagin Molecular Corporation and will be retained by Positron Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-04-015 March 25, 2004

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO DISCUSS THE STATUS OF TWIN CITIES ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT

DECOMMISSIONING

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will discuss with the City of Arden Hills the status

of decommissioning activities at the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant in a public meeting, March

31, in Arden Hills, Minnesota. The plant which formerly manufactured ammunition containing

depleted uranium, is located near Arden Hills.

The meeting, sponsored by the City of Arden Hills to discuss radioactive contamination and

cleanup at the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant, will be held at 6 p.m. at the Arden Hills City Hall,

1245 Highway 96, Arden Hills.

The NRC’s presentation will focus on an overview of the NRC’s decommissioning process, the

decommissioning plan for this site, the extent of radiological contamination associated with the use of

depleted uranium in and around Building 502 of the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant, as well as

the current status of NRC’s decommissioning reviews at the site.

Decommissioning activities at the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant have been conducted

by Alliant Techsystems, Inc., since 2001. Between 2001 and 2003, the NRC conducted ten inspections

to ensure compliance with the NRC’s regulations and details of the decommissioning plan. Inspection

reports are available through Region III Public Affairs Office and the electronic reading room at

NRC’s web site: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . Assistance in using the web reading

room is available by calling the NRC Public Document Room at 800-397-4209.

###
EXHIBIT 32.2



---

Written Statement Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Senior Vice President, Treasurer and
Assistant Secretary of Webster Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the Form 10-K Report of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Gregory S. MadarGregory S. Madar Senior Vice
President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer) March 29, 2007




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Webster Preferred Capital Corporation and will be retained by Webster Preferred Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-05-031 August 30, 2005

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC CONTINUES TO MONITOR NUCLEAR PLANTS AFFECTED BY 

HURRICANE KATRINA

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is working closely with operators at three nuclear

plants to ensure continued safe and secure operations in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

As a precautionary measure, the Waterford 3 nuclear plant near Taft, La., shut down

when a hurricane warning was issued for St. Charles Parish on Saturday. It remains in an

Unusual Event, the lowest of four emergency action levels. Electrical power for key safety

systems on site is being supplied by the plant’s standby diesel generators, following a loss of offsite power caused by instability in the regional electrical grid. 

NRC staff have independently verified that key plant systems and structures, are

undamaged and able to support current plant operations. At the direction of the NRC, the

nation’s nuclear plants, which are among the most robust structures in the critical infrastructure,

have increased security preparedness and capabilities available during emergencies. 

A member of the NRC staff plans to accompany officials from the State of Louisiana and

the Federal Emergency Management Agency during a survey of the site within the next 48 hours. 

NRC approval is needed before the plant can be restarted. This survey will include off-site

evacuation routes and emergency sirens.

The Grand Gulf nuclear plant near Port Gibson, Miss., and River Bend Nuclear Station

near Baton Rouge, La., were both operating at reduced power this morning. The plants operated

through the storm, but voluntarily reduced power generation to assist in restoring stability to the

electrical grid when a drop in energy consumption caused grid voltage to fluctuate. 
-2-

Some emergency sirens were unavailable at Grand Gulf and River Bend, but Entergy

Nuclear has informed the NRC they can make offsite notifications in the event of an emergency,

should the need arise. The NRC will work with FEMA to independently verify siren operability.

NRC staff continue to monitor the situation from its incident response center at its Region

IV office in Arlington, Texas.

 ###
### Scop e of Working Group Negotiations for Commercial HVAC, WH, and CRE Certification

**•** Alternative Efficiency Determination Methods for Commercial HVAC, WH, and CRE Only (Open Rulemaking)

o AEDM Definition

o AEDM Substantiation (What gets tested ? How many basic models or individual models get tested? How often must things get tested? What’s a valid tolerance?)

o Ratings Validation Process (What is a valid rating?)

**•** Model Groupings for Determining and Certifying Ratings (Certification Testing & AEDM)

o Basic Model v. Basic Model Group v. Product Class

**•** Certification Testing

o What tolerance should be used?

o How many units per model should be tested ?

o Built

- to

- Order Equipment (One

- offs)

**•** Certification

o W hat information gets submitted as part of the certification (Proper docum entation of information needed to test especially for high

- efficiency HVAC equipment) ?

o How often should certifications be made?

o By whom ?

o When (Timing of Initial Requirement before distribution in commerce/when ordered ) ?

o Confidentiality (What portions of th e certification report are considered confidential?)

**•** Initial Certification Deadline for Commercial HVAC, CRE, and WH Equipment

**•** Information Disclosures of Publicly Available information (Certification/Industry Program Guidelines/Testing Results from Indust ry Public Guidelines and DOE Testing)

**•** Enforcement

o Enforcement Testing

- Witness

o Enforcement Sample Size and Tolerance

**•** Verification

o DOE Verification

o Voluntary Industry Programs
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.129

                              ENVIROTEST SYSTEMS CORP.
                               6903 ROCK LEDGE DRIVE
                                 BETHEDSA, MD 20817


                                    June 4, 1998

C. Michael Alston, Esq.
9706 Mill Race Estates Drive
Vienna, Virginia 22182

Dear Mr. Alston:

     This letter agreement sets forth the terms of your employment 
arrangement with Envirotest Systems Corp. (the "Company"), and amends that 
certain Separation, Release and Waiver Agreement (the "Separation 
Agreement"), dated as of September 30, 1997, by and between you, the Company 
and its affiliates and parents. In addition, this letter agreement amends and 
restates in its entirety the letter agreement dated April 20, 1998 between 
you and the Company. You shall serve as Vice President, General Counsel and 
Secretary for the Company with the salary and other benefits specified in 
paragraphs 1(a)-(e) and 5 of the Separation Agreement. For purposes of this 
letter agreement, the "Separation Date" means the date your current 
employment with the Company terminates.

     You acknowledge that the Company has granted you an option to purchase 
36,667 shares of the Company's Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per 
share (the "Stock"), at the exercise price of $6.750 per share pursuant to a 
grant letter dated February 12, 1998 and attached hereto. The Company has 
taken all action required of the Company to authorize the grant of such 
option and the execution and sending of such grant letter.

     In the event of a "Change of Control" (as defined in such grant letter), 
or, if earlier, upon your termination of your employment for any reason 
(alternatively, the "Trigger Date"), the Company shall (i) pay you a cash 
lump sum in the amount of $123,751.13 and (ii) provide you with the salary 
and benefits specified in the first paragraph of this letter agreement for 
the twelve-month period commencing on the Trigger Date.

     Except as set forth herein, all terms and conditions contained in the 
Separation Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

<PAGE>

                                       2


     Please acknowledge that this letter sets forth the correct terms of 
your employment arrangements with the Company by signing below.

                                       ENVIROTEST SYSTEMS CORP.

                                       By: /s/ Chester Davenport
                                           --------------------------------
                                           Name: Chester Davenport
                                           Title: Chairman

ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO:


------------------------------
C. Michael Alston
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSputtered coatings for protection of spacecraft polymersKapton polyimide oxidizes at significant rates (4.3x10(-24) gram/incident oxygen atom) when exposed in low Earth orbit to the ram atomic oxygen flux. Ion beam sputter deposited thin films of Al2O3 and SiO2 as well as a codeposited mixture of predominantly SiO2 with a small amount of polytetrafluoroethylene were evaluated and found to be effective in protecting Kapton from oxidation in both laboratory plasma ashing tests as well as in space on board shuttle flight STS-8. A protective film of  or = 96 percent SiO2 and  or = 4 percent polytetrafluoroethylene was found to be very flexible compared to the pure metal oxide coatings and resulted in mass loss rates that were 0.2 percent of that of the unprotected Kapton. The optical properties of Kapton for wavelengths investigated between 0.33 and 2.2 microns were not significantly altered by the presence of the coatings or changed by exposure of the coated Kapton to the low Earth orbital ram environment.Document ID19840018735Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsBanks, B. A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Mirtich, M. J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Rutledge, S. K.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Swec, D. M.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1983Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-83706NAS 1.15:83706E-2092Meeting InformationMeeting: Intern. Conf. on Met. CoatingsLocation: San Diego, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: April 9, 1984End Date: April 13, 1984Sponsors:Am. Vacuum Soc.Accession Number84N26803Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-55-72Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840018735.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Margaret A. Weniger, as Administratrix of the Estate of Louis F. Weniger, Deceased, Appellant, v. West India Steamship Company, Respondent.

Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.; Glennon and Dore, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm in the following memorandum: Reading the letter of transmission together with the proof of loss, we think that the trial court was correct in holding there was no malice. [See *post,*p. 791.]
NUMBER 13-21-00228-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

DAVID GREG GONZALES, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 197th District Court

of Willacy County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appears there is no final 

appealable order. On July 27, 2021, the clerk of the court notified appellant of this defect 

and provided ten days to correct. Appellant has neither corrected the defect nor 

responded to the court’s notice.
2

Generally, a state appellate court only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a 

criminal defendant where there has been a final judgment of conviction. Workman v. 

State, 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (1961); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 

160, 161 (Tex. App.–Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). Exceptions to the general rule include: 

(1) certain appeals while on deferred adjudication community supervision, Kirk v. State, 

942 S.W.2d 624, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); (2) appeals from the denial of a motion to 

reduce bond, TEX. R. APP. P. 31.1; McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161; and (3) certain appeals 

from the denial of habeas corpus relief, Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.-

-Dallas 1998, no pet.); McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161.

Our review of the documents before the Court shows that appellant’s case is still 

pending in the trial court and it does not reveal any appealable orders entered by the trial 

court within thirty days before the filing of appellant's notice of appeal. Moreover, 

the notice of appeal cannot be construed as premature because it was filed before the 

trial court has made a finding of guilt or has received a jury verdict. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

27.1(b).

The Court, having examined and fully considered the notice of appeal, is of the 

opinion that there is not an appealable order and this Court lacks jurisdiction over the 

matters herein. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

JAIME TIJERINA

Justice

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the

16th day of September, 2021.