In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14-733V 

Filed: March 28, 2016 

Not for Publication 

************************************* 

FREDRICK RICHARDSON, * 

 * 

Petitioner, * 

 * 

 v. * 

 * 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

* 

************************************* 

Ronald C. Homer, Boston, MA for petitioner. 

Heather L. Pearlman, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

On August 13, 2014, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National 

Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10–34 (2012). Petitioner alleged that he 

suffered from chronic shoulder pain consistent with adhesive capsulitis that was caused by his 

receipt of influenza (“flu”) vaccine on November 4, 2011. On November 12, 2015, the 

undersigned issued a decision awarding compensation to petitioner based on the parties’ 

stipulation. 

On March 18, 2016, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. Petitioner 

requests attorneys’ fees in the amount of $17,407.30 and attorneys’ costs in the amount of 

$621.51 for a total amount of $18,028.81. In compliance with General Order #9, petitioner has 

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this 

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal 

Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) 

(Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that 

all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets 

or commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar 

information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a 

decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact such information prior to the 

document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within 

the banned categories listed above, the special master shall redact such material from public access.

Attorneys’ fees and costs decision; 

respondent does not object
2 

filed a signed statement indicating petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. On March 28, 

2016, respondent filed a response stating respondent has no objection to petitioner’s motion for 

attorneys’ fees and costs. 

The Vaccine Act permits an award of “reasonable attorneys’ fees” and “other costs.” 

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e)(1). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request and the lack of 

opposition from respondent, the undersigned GRANTS petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees 

and costs. The undersigned awards $18,028.81, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees 

and costs. The award shall be in the form of a check made payable jointly to petitioner and 

Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C. in the amount of $18,028.81. 

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of 

the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 28, 2016 s/ Laura D. Millman

 Laura D. Millman

 Special Master

 

2

 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or 

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.