alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. IS18-766-000; IS18-767-000]

Take notice that a technical conference will be held Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. (Eastern Standard Time), in Hearing Room 7, at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington DC 20426.

                    At the technical conference, the Commission staff and the parties to the proceeding should be prepared to discuss all issues set for technical conference as established in the October 25, 2018 order,                     *Mid-America Pipeline Company, LLC*                     et al., 165 FERC 61,046. All interested persons are permitted to attend.                

                    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please send an email to                     *accessibility@ferc.gov*                     or call toll free 1-866-208-3372 (voice) or 202-502-8659 (TTY); or send a fax to 202-208-2106 with the required accommodations.                

                    For more information about this technical conference please contact Matthew Petersen at (202)-502-6845 or                     *matthew.petersen@ferc.gov.*

Dated: December 12, 2018.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-27309 Filed 12-17-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### Lillian V. M. Pascoe-Rutter, Respondent, v. 30 Fifth Ave. Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ. [Order granted motion for examination before trial.]
§ 2417.207 Restrictions that apply to testimony. ( a ) Conditions or restrictions may be imposed on the testimony of employees including, for example: ( 1 ) Limiting the areas of testimony;
( 2 ) Requiring the requester and other parties to the legal proceeding to agree that the transcript of the testimony will be kept under seal;
( 3 ) Requiring that the transcript will be used or made available only in the particular legal proceeding for which testimony was requested. The requester may also be required to provide a copy of the transcript of testimony at the requester's expense.
( b ) The employee's written declaration may be provided in lieu of testimony.
( c ) If authorized to testify pursuant to this part, an employee may testify as to facts within his or her personal knowledge, but, unless specifically authorized to do so by the Chairman of the FLRA, the General Counsel, or the Chairman of the Panel, as appropriate, the employee shall not: ( 1 ) Disclose confidential or privileged information; or
( 2 ) For a current employee, testify as an expert or opinion witness with regard to any matter arising out of the employee's official duties or the functions of the FLRA unless testimony is being given on behalf of the United States (see also 5 CFR 2635.805).
( d ) The scheduling of an employee's testimony, including the amount of time that the employee will be made available for testimony, will be subject to the approval of the Chairman of the FLRA, the General Counsel, or the Chairman of the Panel, as appropriate.
[74 FR 11640, Mar. 19, 2009, as amended at 81 FR 63364, Sept. 15, 2016]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bio Medica
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2003
(the "Report"), I, Keith E. Palmer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                 (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                       section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                       of 1934; and

                 (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly
                       presents, in all material respects, the financial
                       condition and results of operations of the Company.




                                     /s/ Keith E. Palmer
                                     -------------------
                                     Keith E. Palmer
                                     Chief Financial Officer and
                                     Executive Vice President

                                     November 13, 2003
### SUBCHAPTER IV—PARTICULAR WORK OR IMPROVEMENTS
-  Home 
-  File Repository 
-  Collection Management 
-                   List of Classes              

# List of Classes

The official listing of publications available for selection by depository libraries.

## Categories

List of Classes Data Files

ASCII text versions of the List of Classes and related files. These files are updated twice monthly and made available on the 1st and 15th of every month.

## Documents

List of Classes (Print Version)

Official paper version of the listing of publications available for selection by depository libraries. Updated semi-annually. (October 2011)

      Download (pdf, 4.64MB)

List of Classes (Print Version) Revised 11-2015

Official paper version of the listing of publications available for selection by depository libraries. Updated semi-annually. (November 2015)

      Download (pdf, 4.93MB)

List of Classes (Print Version) Revised 4-13

Official paper version of the listing of publications available for selection by depository libraries. Updated semi-annually. (April 2013)

      Download (pdf, 4.24MB)

List of Classes (Print Version) Revised 6-2014

Official paper version of the listing of publications available for selection by depository libraries. Updated semi-annually. (June 2014)

      Download (pdf, 4.70MB)

Newly-Added Congressional Document Item Numbers

Temporary .csv file provided as an additional option to assist libraries in the evaluation and selection of the new item numbers before the extended annual update selection cycle deadline of August 12, 2011.

      Download (text/csv, 14.96KB)
#### Ilma M. RODRIGUEZ, a.k.a. Carmen Cecilia Martinez-Mora, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 01-70698.

INS Nos. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ] [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 29, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*693MEMORANDUM **

lima M. Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Colombia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying suspension of deportation and voluntary departure. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a.1 Where, as here, the BIA conducts a de novo review of the record, we review the BIA’s decision. *See De Leon-Barrios v. INS,*116 F.3d 391, 393 (9th Cir.1997). We deny the petition.

The BIA properly denied suspension of deportation because Rodriguez, who was deported in 1992, did not accrue the requisite seven years’ continuous presence in the United States. *Cf. Barragan-Sanehez v. Rosenberg,*471 F.2d 758, 760 (9th Cir. 1972) (holding that alien’s continuous presence in the country was interrupted by voluntary departure under threat of deportation proceedings).

The BIA properly denied voluntary departure because of Rodriguez’s admission that she lied in her 1992 deportation proceedings regarding her name and country of citizenship. *See Estrada-Posada v. INS,*924 F.2d 916, 920-21 (9th Cir.1991).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. Pursuant to the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 ("IIRIRA"), the transitional rules apply, *see Kalaw*v. *INS,*133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir. 1997), and we therefore have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), as amended by IIRIRA § 309(c), *see Avetova-Elisseva v. INS, 213*F.3d 1192, 1195 n. 4 (9th Cir.2000).
#### Cecilia R. Schenkman, Respondent, v. Murray S. Schenkman, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jonathan D. Klein, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Getty
Images, Inc.; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report.



By:

/S/    JONATHAN D. KLEINJonathan D. Klein Co-Founder and Chief Executive
Officer




Date: June 18, 2007
Order filed, March 8, 2018.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-17-00847-CV

____________

MARCUS LADETTE DUNCAN, Appellant

V.

ARDMORE APARTMENTS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1099611

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due December 27, 2017. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. On February 6, 2018, this court issued an order requiring the court 

reporter to file the reporter’s record on or before March 8, 2018. On March 6, 2018, 

the court reporter notified this court that appellant has not paid or made arrangements 

to pay for the record and is not appealing as indigent. 
Appellant filed a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs in 

the trial court. No contest was filed. “A party who files a Statement of Inability to 

Afford Payment of Court Costs cannot be required to pay costs except by order of 

the court as provided by this rule.” See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(a). Appellant has not 

been ordered to pay costs pursuant to Rule 145. 

Accordingly, we order Jodi Masera, the official court reporter, to file the 

record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 11.0 Computation of Per Share Earnings

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is
calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares adjusted for the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options. ESOP shares are only considered outstanding for earnings per
share calculations when they are committed to be released. Earnings per share of common stock for the year ended December 31, 1998 has been determined by dividing net loss from April 3,
1998 (date of initial public offering) through December 31, 1998 by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding.

Presented
below are the calculations for basic and diluted earnings per share:

|                                             |  | Year Ended
December 31, 1999 |           | April 3, 1998
Through
December 31, 1998 |  
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | --------- | --------------------------------------- | -
|Basic:                                       |  |                              |           |                                         |  
|Net income (loss)                            |  | $                            | 4,020,794 |                                         | $
|Weighted average shares outstanding          |  |                              | 5,571,247 |                                         |  
|Basic earnings (loss) per share              |  | $                            | 0.72      |                                         | $
|                                             |  |                              |           |                                         |  
|Diluted:                                     |  |                              |           |                                         |  
|Net income (loss)                            |  | $                            | 4,020,794 |                                         | $
|Weighted average shares outstanding          |  |                              | 5,571,247 |                                         |  
|Effect of dilutive stock options outstanding |  |                              |          |                                         |  
|                                             |  |                              |           |                                         |  
|Diluted weighted average shares outstanding  |  |                              | 5,571,247 |                                         |  
|Diluted earnings (loss) per share            |  | $                            | 0.72      |                                         | $
|                                             |  |                              |           |                                         |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

WILLIAM M. WINDSOR ) 

) 

) 

) 

Plaintiff, pro se 

v. ) Civil Case No. 10-0197 (RJL) 

) 

JUDGE ORINDA D. EVANS, et al. ) 

hereby 

) 

Defendants. ) 

ORDER ~ (February ",2010) 

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is 

ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and 

Preliminary Injunction [# 3] is DENIED, and it is further 

ORDERED that plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED, and it is further 

ORDERED that all remaining motions [# 4, 5, 6, and 7] are DENIED as 

MOOT, and it is further 

1 
ORDERED that this matter be referred to the United States District Court for 

the Northern District of Georgia to determine whether plaintiff is in contempt of an 

Order entered in that Court. 

SO ORDERED. 

United States District Judge 

2
§ 2430.6 Contents of application; net worth exhibit; documentation of fees and expenses. ( a ) An application for an award of fees and expenses under the Act shall identify the applicant and the proceeding for which an award is sought. The application shall state the particulars in which the applicant has prevailed and identify the positions of the General Counsel in the proceeding that the applicant alleges were not substantially justified. The application shall also state the number of employees of the applicant and describe briefly the type and purpose of its organization or business.
( b ) The application shall include a statement that the applicant's net worth does not exceed $5 million.
( c ) The application shall state the amount of fees and expenses for which an award is sought.
( d ) The application may also include any other matters that the applicant wishes the Authority to consider in determining whether and in what amount an award should be made.
( e ) The application shall be signed by the applicant or an authorized officer or attorney of the applicant. It shall also contain or be accompanied by a written verification under oath or under penalty of perjury that the information provided in the application is true.
( f ) Each applicant must provide with its application a detailed exhibit showing the net worth of the applicant when the proceeding was initiated. The exhibit may be in any form convenient to the applicant that provides full disclosure of the applicant's assets and liabilities and is sufficient to determine whether the applicant qualifies under the standards in this part. The Administrative Law Judge may require an applicant to file additional information to determine its eligibility for an award.
( g ) The application shall be accompanied by full documentation of the fees and expenses for which an award is sought. A separate itemized statement shall be submitted for each professional firm or individual whose services are covered by the application, showing the hours spent in connection with the proceeding by each individual, the rate at which each fee has been computed, any expenses for which reimbursement is sought, the total amount claimed, and the total amount paid or payable by the applicant or by any other person or entity for the services provided. The Administrative Law Judge may require the applicant to provide vouchers, receipts, or other substantiation for any expenses claimed.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

 www.nrc.gov 

No. I-03-67 November 10, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC ASSIGNS NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR TO BEAVER VALLEY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Region I Office has named a new resident inspector for

the Beaver Valley nuclear power plant, in Shippingport, Pa. Paul C. Cataldo has been assigned to the

two-unit site, which is operated by First Energy Corp.

Mr. Cataldo joins Resident Inspector Galen Smith at Beaver Valley. He replaces David Kern,

who was reassigned as the Senior Resident Inspector at Three Mile Island.

Most recently, Mr. Cataldo was an NRC resident inspector at Millstone Station in Waterford

Conn. He joined the NRC’s Region III office near Chicago in 1996 as an operator licensing examiner.

Prior to joining the agency, Mr. Cataldo was a materials test reactor operator at the University

of Massachusetts-Lowell. He also has experience in the manufacturing industry, in which he

performed, among other things, quality assurance inspections, between 1989 and 1993. Mr. Cataldo

also served as a machinist's mate aboard a U.S. Navy nuclear attack submarine.

Mr. Cataldo is a graduate of the University of Massachusetts-Lowell with a bachelor's degree in

nuclear engineering.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve as the

agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work projects and

interacting with plant workers and the public.

Mr. Cataldo and the Beaver Valley resident inspectors can be reached at 724/643-2000.

###
**INLAND FIBER GROUP, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES**



|Exhibit 32.1
|------------



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
	18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
	AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual report of Inland Fiber Group, LLC and Fiber Finance Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John M. Rudey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/
John
M.
Rudey
|-----------------

|John
M.
Rudey
Chief
Executive
Officer
April
14,
2005
|----------------------------------------------------
#### The Udell Manufacturing Company, Appellant, v. John Perkins, Respondent.

It does not appear on the face of the complaint in this action that another action is pending between the same parties for the same cause of action. The mere fact that the demurring party produced a witness on the trial of an issue of law, to prove over objection that another action is pending between the same parties, is so incongruous with the specified cause of demurrer that the interlocutory judgment of the City Court of Yonkers must be reversed, with costs and disbursements, and the demurrer overruled, with ten dollars costs, with leave to defendant to answer within twenty days on payment of the costs of this appeal, as well as the motion costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
§ 323.2 General policy. ( a ) In an immediate postattack period all decisions regarding the use of resources will be directed to the objective of national survival and recovery. In order to achieve this objective, postattack resources will be assigned to activities concerned with the maintenance and saving of lives, immediate military defense and retaliatory operations, economic activities essential to continued survival and recovery.
( b ) This guidance is designed to achieve a degree of national equity in the use of resources and to assign and conserve resources effectively in the immediate postattack period. Until more specific instructions are available, these are the general guidelines within which managerial judgment and common sense must be used to achieve national objectives under widely differing emergency conditions.
### §2317a. Cooperative agreements

#### (a) In general

For the purpose of expediting the cost-effective design and construction of wetlands restoration that is part of an authorized water resources project, the Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements under section 6305 of title 31 with nonprofit organizations with expertise in wetlands restoration to carry out such design and construction on behalf of the Secretary.

#### (b) Limitations

#### (1) Per project limit

A cooperative agreement under this section may not obligate the Secretary to pay the nonprofit organization more than $1,000,000 for any single wetlands restoration project.

#### (2) Annual limit

The total value of work carried out under cooperative agreements under this section may not exceed $5,000,000 in any fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 110–114, title II, §2015, Nov. 8, 2007, 121 Stat. 1076.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 2 of Pub. L. 110–114, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.