alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FY
                  2006
              IMAGIN
                  MOLECULAR CORPORATION
              FORM
                  10-KSB
 **EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 
 **Certification
        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 
 **As
        Adopted Pursuant to**
 
 **Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
  In
          connection with the Annual Report of Imagin Molecular Corporation (the
          “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
          Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Joseph G.
          Oliverio, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
          pursuant
          to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
          Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d),
        as
        applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
                  April 2,
                  2007
              
              /s/
                  Joseph G. OliverioJoseph
                  G. OliverioChief
                  Executive Officer
 
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Positron Corporation and will be retained by Positron Corporation and furnished
        to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-154 December 7, 2004

NRC TO HOLD PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE 

ON DUKE AMENDMENT REQUEST FOR CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will hold a predecisional enforcement conference

with Duke Energy Corp. Dec. 17 in Rockville, Md., to discuss three apparent violations of NRC

requirements. The apparent violations are related to Duke’s license amendment request to allow the

use of mixed oxide (MOX) fuel at its Catawba Nuclear Station 17 miles from Charlotte, N.C.

 The enforcement conference will be from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. in Room T-2B3, 11545

Rockville Pike, Rockville. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and will have an opportunity

to communicate with NRC officials after the business portion, but before the meeting is adjourned.

Two of the alleged violations involve the completeness and accuracy of Duke’s license

amendment request and the third involves a failure to periodically update the Final Safety Analysis

Report for the Catawba plant. The proposed amendment would allow Duke to use four MOX

assemblies at Catawba. MOX contains a mixture of plutonium and uranium oxides. The Duke request

is part of a joint U.S.-Russian Federation program to dispose of surplus plutonium from nuclear

weapons by converting the material into MOX fuel for use in nuclear reactors.

The conference is an opportunity for company officials to provide their perspective on the

apparent violations and to offer any other information that they believe the NRC should take into

consideration in making an enforcement decision. No decision on the apparent violations or any

enforcement action will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made later by NRC

officials.

###
#### § 2427.1 Scope.

This part sets forth procedures under which requests may be submitted to the Authority seeking the issuance of general statements of policy or guidance under 5 U.S.C. 7105(a)(1).
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-05-018 April 15, 2005

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO DISCUSS 2004 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

FOR CLINTON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Exelon Generation

Company on Thursday, April 21, to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety performance last year at

the Clinton Nuclear Power Plant. The plant is located near Clinton, Ill.

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, is scheduled to begin at

6 p.m. at Vespasian Warner Public Library District, 310 N. Quincy St., Clinton.

Before the meeting is adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the

public on the safety performance of the Clinton plant, as well as the role of the NRC in ensuring safe

plant operation.

“The NRC continually reviews the performance of the Clinton plant and the nation’s other

commercial nuclear power facilities,” NRC Region III Administrator James Caldwell said. “This

meeting will provide an opportunity for a discussion of our annual assessment of safety performance

with the company and with local officials and residents who live near the plant. Our goal is to explain

the NRC oversight process and make as much information as possible available to the public regarding

our regulation of these facilities.”

The NRC’s assessment concluded that the Clinton plant operated safely during the period. The

NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear plant

performance. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,”

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. 

All of the inspection findings and performance indicators for Clinton during 2004 were

determined to be “green.” As a result of this performance, the NRC will conduct the normal, baseline

level of inspections during the upcoming year.

Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and

by inspection specialists from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill., and the agency’s headquarters in

Rockville, Md. Among the areas of plant operations to be inspected this year by NRC specialists are

safety system design and performance, transportation and processing of radioactive waste, problem

identification and resolution, and modifications.
2

A letter sent from the NRC Region III Office to plant officials addresses the performance of the

plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the

NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/clin_2004q4.pdf.

Current performance information for Clinton is available on the NRC’s web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CLIN/clin_chart.html.

###
§ 1655.12 Loan agreement. ( a ) Upon determining that a loan request meets the requirements of this part, the TSP record keeper will provide the participant with the terms and conditions of the loan.
( b ) By accepting the loan agreement, the participant agrees to be bound by all of its terms and conditions, agrees to repay the loan by payroll deduction, and certifies, under penalty of perjury, to the truth and completeness of all statements made in the loan request and loan agreement to the best of his or her knowledge.
( c ) For loan requests not completed on the TSP website, the TSP record keeper must receive the completed loan agreement (including any required supporting documentation) before the expiration date stated on the loan agreement or the agreement will not be processed.
( d ) The signed loan agreement must be accompanied by: ( 1 ) In the case of a residential loan, supporting materials that document the purchase or construction of the residence and the amount requested (as described in § 1655.20); and
( 2 ) Any other information that the Executive Director may require.
( e ) A participant may request, in the form and manner prescribed by the TSP record keeper, that the loan be disbursed by direct deposit to a checking or savings account maintained by the participant in a financial institution.
[87 FR 31693, May 24, 2022]
Exhibit 10.17 

                                September 3, 1998


TO:      Name

RE:      AMENDMENT OF NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AWARDS

         The  Non-Qualified  Stock  Option  contract for your May 29, 1998 grant
failed to address  one  important  aspect of the terms of the grant  relating to
forfeiture of the award if you voluntarily terminate employment with the Company
prior to age 62.  Therefore,  Sections  3.c.  and 4 of your  contract are hereby
rescinded to be replaced in their entirety with the following:

         3.c.     When,  prior to a Change of  Control,  there has  occurred  an
                  event of  forfeiture  as  defined  in  Section 4  herein,  the
                  Option, to the extent  exercisable,  shall remain  exercisable
                  for thirty (30) days thereafter.

         4.       Forfeiture.  Prior to a change  of  Control,  this  Option  is
                  subject  to  forfeiture  upon  the  occurrence  of  one of the
                  following events:

                    a.   The Optionee's employment is Terminated for Cause; or

                    b.   The Optionee engages in competition with the Company or
                         an Affiliate; or

                    c.   The Optionee voluntarily terminates employment prior to
                         the age of 62.

                  If there is an event of forfeiture,  the portion of the Option
                  that is exercisable at that time may be exercised as set forth
                  in Section 3 hereof.

         All other terms and conditions of your Award remain the same.

         Please  acknowledge your acceptance of the amendment set forth above by
signing  and  dating  one copy of this  note in the  space  provided  below  and
returning it to Janet Andis.  Upon receipt of a copy of this note signed by you,
your Award will be deemed amended accordingly.



AGREED:________________________             ___________________________
                                                   D. R. Wenzel
Date:    ___________________________         Chief Financial Officer
#### § 178.105 Basis of claim settlements.

The burden is upon the claimant to establish the timeliness of the claim, the liability of the United States, and the claimant's right to payment. The settlement of claims is based upon the written record only, which will include the submissions by the claimant and the agency. OPM will accept the facts asserted by the agency, absent clear and convincing evidence to the contrary.
### §46d–2. Repealed. Pub. L. 90–57, July 28, 1967, 81 Stat. 130

Section, Pub. L. 89–90, §101, July 27, 1965, 79 Stat. 268, provided for computation of long-distance telephone calls for Senators, wide area telephone service contracts, and effective date of changes. See section 6314 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 90–57 provided that the repeal is effective Jan. 1, 1968.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 05-146 November 1, 2005

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING NOV. 9 ON RULEMAKING

CONCERNING NEW AUTHORITY OVER RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a roundtable discussion open to the public

Nov. 9 at agency headquarters in Rockville, Md., to seek input on a new rulemaking to extend NRC’s

regulatory authority over accelerator-produced radioactive material and certain discrete sources of

naturally occurring radioactive material.

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 gave the NRC regulatory authority over additional radioactive

materials, including accelerator-produced radioactive material and any discrete source of radium-226

that is produced, extracted or converted after extraction for use in commercial, medical or research

activities. NRC authority also can be extended over naturally occurring radioactive material that the

Commission, in consultation with other federal agencies, determines is a threat to public health and

safety or the common defense and security.

The meeting will be held in room T2B3 of Two White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, from

9 a.m. to 4 p.m. Discussion will be held in a roundtable format to solicit input from stakeholders for a

proposed rule. Participants at the roundtable will be invited representatives of the broad spectrum of

interests potentially affected by this rulemaking, such as state regulatory agencies and members of the

nuclear medicine and radiopharmaceutical industries. Members of the audience will have an

opportunity to comment and ask questions. Teleconferencing will be available.

Those planning to attend the meeting are encouraged to pre-register by notifying Jayne M.

McCausland, at (301) 415-6219 or by e-mail at jmm2@nrc.gov . Teleconference information will be

available through Ms. McCausland.

###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-008 January 14, 2003

NRC FINDS NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FROM EXTENDED

OPERATION OF CATAWBA AND MCGUIRE NUCLEAR PLANTS

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued its final environmental impact statements

on the proposed renewal of the operating licenses of the Catawba and McGuire nuclear power plants. In

the reports, the NRC staff found there are no environmental impacts that would preclude license

renewal.

The McGuire nuclear facility is located 17 miles north-northwest of Charlotte, North Carolina,

in Mecklenburg County. The operating licenses for Units 1 and 2 expire on June 12, 2021, and

March 3, 2023, respectively. 

The Catawba nuclear facility is located 18 miles southwest of Charlotte, North Carolina, in York

County. The operating licenses for Units 1 and 2 expire on December 6, 2024, and February 24, 2026,

respectively.

Duke Energy Corporation, the operator of the four units, submitted the application for renewal

of all four operating licenses on June 13, 2001.

As part of its environmental review of the application, the NRC held public meetings near both

facilities, concerning the scope of the review and on a draft version of the environmental impact

statement for each plant. Comments were received from members of the public, local officials and

representatives of other agencies.

The reports will be available electronically on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html through the NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and

Management System (ADAMS). Help in using ADAMS is available by contacting the NRC Public

Document Room staff at 301/415-4737 or 1/800/397-4209, or by sending a message to pdr@nrc.gov via

e-mail. The reports also are available for public inspection at the NRC’s Public Document Room,

located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

###
### §2293. Reprogramming during national emergencies

#### (a) Termination or deferment of civil works projects; application of resources to national defense projects

In the event of a declaration of war or a declaration by the President of a national emergency in accordance with the National Emergencies Act [50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.] that requires or may require use of the Armed Forces, the Secretary, without regard to any other provision of law, may (1) terminate or defer the construction, operation, maintenance, or repair of any Department of the Army civil works project that he deems not essential to the national defense, and (2) apply the resources of the Department of the Army's civil works program, including funds, personnel, and equipment, to construct or assist in the construction, operation, maintenance, and repair of authorized civil works, military construction, and civil defense projects that are essential to the national defense.

#### (b) Termination of state of war or national emergency

The Secretary shall immediately notify the appropriate committees of Congress of any actions taken pursuant to the authorities provided by this section, and cease to exercise such authorities not later than 180 calendar days after the termination of the state of war or national emergency, whichever occurs later.

(Pub. L. 99–662, title IX, §923, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4194.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Emergencies Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 94–412, Sept. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1255, which is classified principally to chapter 34 (§1601 et seq.) of Title 50, War and National Defense. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1601 of Title 50 and Tables.
### §2805. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) NOAA authorization

For development and implementation of programs under this chapter, including financial assistance to non-Federal agencies and institutions to support implementation of intensive monitoring programs under section 2803(d) of this title, there is authorized to be appropriated to the Under Secretary amounts not to exceed $5,000,000 for fiscal year 1993, $8,000,000 for fiscal year 1994, $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1995, and $12,000,000 for fiscal year 1996.

#### (b) EPA authorization

For development and implementation of programs under this chapter, including financial assistance to non-Federal agencies and institutions to support implementation of intensive monitoring programs under section 2803(d) of this title, there is authorized to be appropriated to the Administrator amounts not to exceed $5,000,000 for fiscal year 1993, $8,000,000 for fiscal year 1994, and $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1995, and $12,000,000 for fiscal year 1996.

(Pub. L. 92–532, title V, §505, as added Pub. L. 102–567, title V, §501, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4299.)
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. 57-59 East 59th Street, Inc., Respondent, against William E. Boyland et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York. Appellants. [502 Park Ave. and 53-57 E. 59th St., Borough of Manhattan.]

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Breitel and Bergan, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23909]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1548-DR]


Louisiana; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1548-DR), dated September 15, 2004, 
and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 18, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 15, 2004:

    Ascension, Avoyelles, Bossier, Caddo, Concordia, East Baton 
Rouge, Grant, Lafayette, Livingston, Ouachita, Rapides, St. Helena, 
and St. Martin Parishes for emergency protective measures (Category 
B) under the Public Assistance Program.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)


Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-23909 Filed 10-25-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 208 (Thursday, October 28, 2004)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 63039]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24302]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 208 / Thursday, October 28, 2004 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 63039]]


                Memorandum of October 21, 2004

                
Delegation of Certain Functions Related to the 
                Sudan Peace Act

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by 
                the Constitution and the laws of the United States, 
                including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I 
                hereby delegate to you the determination, 
                certification, and reporting functions conferred upon 
                the President by sections 6(b)(1) and 6(c) of the Sudan 
                Peace Act (Public Law 107-245).

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, October 21, 2004.

[FR Doc. 04-24302
Filed 10-27-04; 9:31 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
§ 212.25 Further proceedings. ( a ) Ordinarily, the determination of an award will be made on the basis of the written record. However, on request of either the applicant or the Commission investigative attorney, or on his or her own initiative, the presiding officer may in his or her discretion order further proceedings, such as an informal conference, oral argument, additional written submissions or an evidentiary hearing. Such further proceedings shall be held only when necessary for full and fair resolution of the issues arising from the application, and shall be conducted as promptly as possible.
( b ) A request that the presiding officer order further proceedings under this section shall specifically identify the information sought or the disputed issues and shall explain why the additional proceedings are necessary to resolve the issues.