alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-103 September 3, 2002

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETINGS TO DISCUSS NEW ENVIRONMENTAL 

INFORMATION ON PROPOSED MOX NUCLEAR FACILITY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold public meetings September 17-19, in South

Carolina, Georgia and North Carolina to discuss environmental impacts of the proposed Mixed Oxide

Fuel Fabrication Facility contained in a report by the Department of Energy’s contractor, Duke Cogema

Stone & Webster (DCS). 

The DOE is proposing to construct the MOX facility at its Savannah River site near Aiken,

South Carolina. If NRC grants the license, DCS could build a MOX facility that would convert surplus

weapons-grade plutonium, supplied by the Department of Energy, into fuel for use in a limited number

of commercial nuclear power reactors. Commercial nuclear power plants in the United States currently

use only uranium as fuel; the mixed oxide fuel would be a combination of uranium and plutonium. 

There would be no reprocessing or subsequent reuse of the spent fuel. Converting weapons-grade

plutonium into MOX fuel helps advance the cause of nonproliferation by converting the material into a

form unsuitable for use in weapons. 

The DOE announced in January that it would not build and operate the Plutonium

Immobilization Plant as part of its hybrid approach for surplus weapons plutonium disposition. Instead,

DOE decided that 34 metric tons of surplus weapons plutonium would be converted to MOX fuel at the

proposed MOX facility. This decision resulted in design changes to the proposed facility, which affect

the scope of NRC’s Draft Environmental Impact Statement, and required DCS to submit a revised

environmental report for NRC review. The revised environmental report will be discussed at the public

meetings. 

 The September 17 meeting will be held at the North Augusta Community Center, located at 495

Brookside Avenue, North Augusta, South Carolina; the September 18 meeting will be held at the

Coastal Georgia Center, located at 305 Fahm Street, Savannah, Georgia; and the September 19 meeting

will be held at the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Government Center, located at 600 E. Fourth Street,

Charlotte, North Carolina. All three meetings will be held from 7 p.m. until 10 p.m. and will include

an opportunity for the NRC staff to address questions and comments from the public. 
Information on the revised environmental report and other documents associated with the

proposed MOX project are available through the NRC’s MOX web page at 

http://www.nrc.gov/materials/fuel-cycle-fac/mox/licensing.html. Documents may also be obtained by

contacting NRC’s Public Document Room at 301-415-4737 or 1-800-397-4209. 

For general information on the environmental review process, contact Tim Harris at 301-415-

6613. For technical information associated with the proposed MOX facility, contact Tim Johnson at

301-415-7299 or Drew Persinko at 301-415-6522. 

###
#### § 1201.23 Computation of time.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 72961, Sept. 9, 2024.

In computing the number of days allowed for complying with any deadline, the first day counted is the day after the event from which the time period begins to run. If the date that ordinarily would be the last day for filing falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the filing period will include the first workday after that date. Unless a different deadline is specified by the Board or its designee, 5 days are added to a party's deadline for responding to a document served on the party by mail.

# Example 1:

If an employee receives a decision notice that is effective on July 1, the 30-day period for filing an appeal starts to run on July 2. The filing ordinarily would be timely only if it is made by July 31. If July 31 is a Saturday, however, the last day for filing would be Monday, August 2.

# Example 2:

The judge orders the appellant to file a response to a jurisdictional order no later than October 15, 2012, and that the agency's response is due 10 days after the filing of the appellant's pleading. If the appellant serves the agency with a pleading via regular mail on October 15, the agency's deadline for filing a response will be October 30, not October 25.

[77 FR 62364, Oct. 12, 2012]
#### § 1215.23 Other remedies.

The remedies and sanctions available to the MSPB under this part are not intended to be exclusive. The Chairman of the MSPB or his designee may impose other appropriate sanctions upon a debtor for prolonged or repeated failure to pay a debt. For example, the Chairman or his designee may place the debtor's name on a list of debarred, suspended, or ineligible contractors. In such cases the debtor will be advised of the MSPB's action.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-02-034 July 31, 2002

CONTACT: Breck Henderson E-mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

NRC CITES FORT CALHOUN STATION FOR FINDING

OF LOW TO MODERATE SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued its final determination that a May

inspection finding at Fort Calhoun Station is of low to moderate safety significance and will be

characterized as “white.” The Fort Calhoun Station nuclear plant near Blair, Nebraska, is operated by

Omaha Public Power District (OPPD).

The issue involves an April 24 shipment of low-level radioactive waste from Fort Calhoun. 

Low-level waste material shifted inside a shipping container during transit to a waste processing

facility in Tennessee such that radiation levels on contact with the container exceeded the NRC

maximum of 200 mrem per hour on arrival. A study of the incident indicates that no one received a

radiation dose above NRC limits from contact with the container.

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear power plants with a color

coded significance determination process which classifies regulatory findings as being in one of four

color categories: green, white, yellow, or red in increasing order of regulatory safety significance.

In addition to a white inspection finding, the NRC has issued a Notice of Violation to OPPD

for shipping the waste with higher than allowed radiation levels at the exterior of the container. OPPD

is required to submit a written response explaining the reason for the violation and the corrective

actions taken. 

The white finding may require additional NRC inspection at Fort Calhoun.

###
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       8,462,218
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      19,159,712
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  3,365,014
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     107,069,909
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       106,463,059
<LOANS>                                    162,050,732
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,676,184
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             318,668,348
<DEPOSITS>                                 268,578,249
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         10,183,692
<LONG-TERM>                                 16,152,194
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,154
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,007,841
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             318,668,348
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,364,104
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,975,760
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,339,864
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,668,028
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,005,075
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,334,789
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   62,980
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                517,245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                797,681
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     797,681
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   519,338
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.40
<LOANS-NON>                                    574,843
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               565,320
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,701,008
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   87,804
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,676,184
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           270,457
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,405,727
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL19-14-000]

                    On December 12, 2018, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. EL19-14-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into whether Cottonwood Energy Company LP's Rate Schedule FERC No. 1 may be unjust and unreasonable.                     *Cottonwood Energy Company LP,*                     165 FERC 61,228 (2018).                

                    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL19-14-000, established pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication of this notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                          ( print page 64824)    

Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL19-14-000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214, within 21 days of the date of issuance of the order.

Dated: December 12, 2018.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-27316 Filed 12-17-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
§ 1620.34 Employees who move from a NAF instrumentality to a Federal Government agency. ( a ) An employee of a NAF instrumentality who moves from a NAF instrumentality to a Federal Government agency and who elects to be covered by a NAF retirement system is not eligible to participate in the TSP. Any TSP contributions relating to a period for which an employee elects retroactive NAF retirement coverage must be removed from the TSP as required by the regulations at 5 CFR part 1605.
( b ) An employee of a NAF instrumentality who moves from a NAF instrumentality to a Federal Government agency and who elects to be covered by CSRS or FERS will become eligible to participate in the TSP as determined in accordance with 5 CFR part 1600.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service, Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of closed meeting of Art Advisory Panel. 

# SUMMARY:

Closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held in Washington, DC. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held December 2, 2004. 

# ADDRESSES:

The closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held on December 2, 2004, in Room 4200E beginning at 9:30 a.m., Franklin Court Building, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Carolan, C:AP:AS, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. Telephone (202) 435-5609 (not a toll free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., that a closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held on December 2, 2004, in Room 4200E beginning at 9:30 a.m., Franklin Court Building, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. 

The agenda will consist of the review and evaluation of the acceptability of fair market value appraisals of works of art involved in Federal income, estate, or gift tax returns. This will involve the discussion of material in individual tax returns made confidential by the provisions of 26 U.S.C. 6103. 

A determination as required by section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act has been made that this meeting is concerned with matters listed in section 552b(c)(3), (4), (6), and (7), and that the meeting will not be open to the public. 

David B. Robison, 

Chief, Appeals.

[FR Doc. 04-24339 Filed 10-29-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
****

----

**To View the Synopsis**
****To View "The CIA and the U2 Program" in Adobe Acrobat.**
*Gregory W. Pedlow***
EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


Board of Directors
Wyman Park Bancorporation, Inc.
11 West Ridgely Road
Lutherville, Maryland  21093


     We consent to the  incorporation  of our report dated July 19,  2001,  with
respect to the financial statements of Wyman Park Bancorporation, Inc., included
in this Form 10-KSB, for the year ended June 30, 2001, into the previously filed
Registration  Statements of Wyman Park Bancorporation,  Inc., on Forms S-8 (File
Nos. 333-74235 and 333-74249).





/s/ Anderson Associates, LLP
----------------------------
Anderson Associates, LLP


Baltimore, Maryland
September 24, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       5,807,516
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       8,523,211
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  3,463,846
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     126,031,099
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       124,918,740
<LOANS>                                    123,826,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,600,326
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             281,694,382
<DEPOSITS>                                 235,123,114
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         12,779,094
<LONG-TERM>                                 16,395,563
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,073
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,313,716
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             281,694,382
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,520,287
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            4,354,669
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             8,874,956
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,787,306
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,453,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,421,956
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   68,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                780,586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (285,312)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (285,312)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (173,112)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.84
<LOANS-NON>                                    220,574
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             2,618,672
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,350,222
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  203,180
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,600,326
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           166,185
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,434,141
        

</TABLE>
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 17, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00138

- CR

Billy Edward GONZALEZ

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- CR

- 613 Honorable Jose Luis Garza, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The reporter’s record was due December 30, 2014. This court was unaware a notice of appeal had been filed until approximately two months after the record was due. Once we became aware of the appeal, we sent the reporter a Rule 37.3 letter, advising the reporter to file a notification of late record or file the record within thirty days of the date of the letter. On March 11, 20 14, the court reporter filed a notification of late record stating that he was unaware of the appeal until our Rule 37.3 letter and his other duties have prevented him from filing the record. He asks for an extension of time to complete the record to Apri l 30, 2014. We GRANT the reporter’s extension and

ORDER the court reporter, Julian G. Alderette, to file the reporter’s record in this court on or before April 30, 2014. We advise the reporter that this extension give the reporter 121 days from the origi nal due date. Accordingly, no further extension of time to file the reporter’s record will be granted absent written proof of extraordinary circumstances.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel and the c ourt
reporter.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of March, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Faxton E. Gardner, Respondent, v. Central Park, North and East River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.; McLaughlin and Scott, JJ., dissented on the ground that the evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant was not sufficient to justify submission of the case to the jury.
### §123a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 5, 1955, ch. 568, §1, 69 Stat. 500, which established the basic annual compensation of the coordinator, Joint Recording Facility, has been omitted because of section 4131(l) of this title which abolished the Joint Recording Facility positions and salaries established pursuant to the Legislative Branch Appropriation Act, 1948, and all subsequent acts.
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2016, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Guy Bernstein, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date:  May 15, 2017 | /s/ Guy Bernstein      
|------------------- | -----------------------
|                    | Guy Bernstein          
|                    | Chief Executive Officer
#### § 1303.21 Requesters making requests about themselves or on behalf of others.

In order to obtain greater access to records, a requester who is making a request for records about the requester or on behalf of another individual must comply with the verification of identity requirements as determined by OMB pursuant to OMB's requirements for making requests for access in 5 CFR part 1302. OMB may require a requester to supply additional information as necessary in order to verify the identity of the requester or to verify that a particular individual has consented to disclosure.

[89 FR 48825, June 10, 2024]
#### Joseph R. Julia, Respondent, v. G. Gossler Trading Corp. et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendants-appellants to answer within ten days after service of the order, with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.