alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1481. Violations; penalties

(a) A person commits a class A misdemeanor if that person—

(1) willfully violates a provision of this chapter or a regulation issued thereunder; or

(2) willfully refuses or fails to comply with any lawful order or direction given pursuant to this chapter; or

(3) willfully obstructs any person who is acting in compliance with an order or direction under this chapter.

(b) In a criminal proceeding for an offense under paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a) of this section it shall be a defense for the accused to prove that he used all due diligence to comply with any order or direction that he had reasonable cause to believe that compliance would have resulted in serious risk to human life.

(Pub. L. 93–248, §12, Feb. 5, 1974, 88 Stat. 10; Pub. L. 101–380, title IV, §4302(l), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 539.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–380 substituted "A person commits a class A misdemeanor if that person" for "Any person who" in introductory provisions and struck out ", shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both" after "under this chapter" in par. (3).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1990 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 101–380 applicable to incidents occurring after Aug. 18, 1990, see section 1020 of Pub. L. 101–380, set out as an Effective Date note under section 2701 of this title.
Exhibit 13.2.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Dr. Klaus Hartmann, certify that the Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date:
May 11, 2004

| |  | By:    | /s/DR. KLAUS HARTMANN  
| |  | ------ | -----------------------
| |  | Name:  | Dr. Klaus Hartmann     
| |  | Title: | Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
### §159. Perpetual succession and suits by or against Library of Congress Trust Fund Board

The board shall have perpetual succession, with all the usual powers and obligations of a trustee, including the power to sell, except as herein limited, in respect of all property, moneys, or securities which shall be conveyed, transferred, assigned, bequeathed, delivered, or paid over to it for the purposes above specified. The board may be sued in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, which is given jurisdiction of such suits, for the purpose of enforcing the provisions of any trust accepted by it.

(Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 423, §3, 43 Stat. 1108; Jan. 27, 1926, ch. 6, §1, 44 Stat. 2; June 25, 1936, ch. 804, 49 Stat. 1921; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §32(a), 62 Stat. 991; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §127, 63 Stat. 107.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1926—Act Jan. 27, 1926, inserted "including the power to sell" in first sentence.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Act June 25, 1948, eff. Sept. 1, 1948, as amended by act May 24, 1949, substituted "United States District Court for the District of Columbia" for "district court of the United States for the District of Columbia".

Act June 25, 1936, provided that the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia is to be known as the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-03-012 March 19, 2003

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

 

NRC TO MEET WITH SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS

 SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT HATCH NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Southern Nuclear Operating

Company officials on Wednesday, April 9, to discuss the results of NRC’s annual assessment of safety

performance at the Hatch nuclear power plant near Baxley, Georgia. 

The meeting will be held at 6:00 p.m. at the Southeastern Technical College in Vidalia. The

public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be available before the conclusion of

the meeting to answer any questions.

A letter from the NRC to Southern Nuclear addresses plant safety performance during the

previous year and forms the basis for the meeting discussions. The letter states that, overall, Hatch 

operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and that plant performance was at a level

requiring no additional NRC inspection beyond normal baseline activities. The letter, which is

available from Region II Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/hat_2002q4.pdf , says the NRC staff will

continue inspections of the plant’s implementation of NRC security advisories and Orders to evaluate

compliance with new requirements that may be ordered.

 Current performance indicators for the two units at the Hatch plant are available at 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/HAT1/hat1_chart.html and

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/HAT2/hat2_chart.html

###
### §5366. Criminal penalties

(a) In General.—Any person who violates section 5363 shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both.

(b) Permanent Injunction.—Upon conviction of a person under this section, the court may enter a permanent injunction enjoining such person from placing, receiving, or otherwise making bets or wagers or sending, receiving, or inviting information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers.

(Added Pub. L. 109–347, title VIII, §802(a), Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1961.)
### §1512. Loan size limitation

The amount of any loan made under section 1511(a) of this title with respect to a project described in that section shall not exceed 50 percent of the cost of such project; except that if the loan is made to a person proposing to make application of the resources of the reservoir involved primarily for space heating or cooling or process heat for one or more structures or facilities then existing or under construction, the loan may be in any amount up to 90 per centum of such cost. In any event no loan shall be made in an amount in excess of $3,000,000.

(Pub. L. 96–294, title VI, §612, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 764.)
§ 182.50 Liquidation and payment of drawback claims. ( a ) *General.* When the drawback claim has been fully completed by the filing of all required documents, and exportation of the articles has been established and the amount of duties paid to Canada or Mexico has been established, the entry will be liquidated to determine the proper amount of drawback due either in accordance with the limitation on drawback set forth in § 182.44 of this subpart or in accordance with the regular drawback calculation. The liquidation procedures of subpart H of part 190 of this chapter, as appropriate, will control for purposes of this subpart.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Accelerated payment.* Accelerated drawback payment procedures will apply as set forth in § 190.92 of this chapter, as appropriate. However, a person who receives drawback of duties under this procedure must repay the duties paid if a USMCA drawback claim is adversely affected thereafter by administrative or court action.
[CBP Dec. 21-10, 86 FR 35589, July 6, 2021]
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Argued May 22, 2018

Decided February 27, 2019

Before

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

ROBERT W. GETTLEMAN, District Judge*

No. 17-2207

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MATTHEW ELDER,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District 

Court for the Southern District of Indiana, 

Evansville Division.

No. 3:13-cr-00017-RLY-CMM-8

Richard L. Young,

Judge.

O R D E R

On August 15, 2018, this court ordered a limited remand under the procedure set 

forth in United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 483–84 (7th Cir. 2005), so that the district 

court could state on the record whether it would impose the same sentence in light of 

this court’s conclusion that the appellant, Matthew Elder, was not subject to a 

twenty-year mandatory minimum sentence. United States v. Elder, 900 F.3d 491, 504 (7th

Cir. 2018). The district court has replied that it wishes to further review its sentencing 

determination in light of this court’s conclusion and requests that the case be remanded 

 

*

Of the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 17-2207 Page 2

for resentencing. Accordingly, pursuant to Paladino, the court VACATES Mr. Elder’s

sentence and REMANDS the case to the district court for resentencing.
#### Henry Bryant, Appellant, v. County of Nassau et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Action for specific performance of an alleged oral contract for the sale of real property. Judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits, and in favor of respondent County of Hassau on its counterclaim, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Appeal from order dismissed, without costs. Present — Hagarty, Acting P„ J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
#### Harry Seldner, Respondent, v. John Bittner, Appellant.

Judgment and order of the County Court of Kings county unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
Docket Number: FAA-2012-1227

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 1/17/12

Regional Airline Association 1/17/12

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 1/17/12

ATA Joe White 1/17/12
#### Kenneth C. HALL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jon P. GALLEY; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 02-6039.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 23, 2002.

Kenneth C. Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Ann Rapp Ince, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth C. Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate *of*appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Hall v.*
      *96
      *Galley,*No. CA-01-469-L (D. Md. filed Nov. 21, 2001; entered Nov. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              148,000
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       113,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         30,000
<INVENTORY>                                         175,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    481,000
<PP&E>                                              839,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                      389,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      970,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3,872,000
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             2,394,000
<PREFERRED>                                         681,000
<COMMON>                                         19,830,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      (25,832,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        970,000
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    144,000
<CGS>                                               174,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1,483,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (128,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  221,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1,432,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (4,432,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1,432,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.12)


</TABLE>
§ 1645.5 Calculation of share prices. ( a ) *Calculation of share price.* The share price for each TSP core fund for each business day will apply to all sources of contributions for that fund. The total net earnings (as computed under § 1645.3) for each fund will be divided by the total fund basis (as computed under § 1645.6) for that fund. The resulting number, computed to ten decimal places, represents the incremental change in the value of that fund from the last business day to the current business day. The share price for that fund for the current business day is the sum of the incremental change in the share price for the current business day plus the share price for the prior business day, truncated to four decimal places.
( b ) *Residual net earnings.* When the total net earnings for each business day for each TSP Fund are divided by the total fund basis in that fund, there will be residual net earnings attributable to the truncation described in paragraph (a) of this section which will not be included in the incremental change in the share price of the fund for that business day. The residual net earnings that are not included in the incremental share price for the fund may be added to the earnings for that fund on the next business day.
[70 FR 32214, June 1, 2005, as amended at 87 FR 31681, May 24, 2022]
Order entered August 15, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 22

- 00615

- CR

EX PARTE JAMES MICHAEL DRAUCKER On Appeal from the County Cou rt at Law No. 1 Rockwall Cou nty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. WR

- 1

- 22

- 0006

O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s August 10 , 2022 pro se motion seeking to
amend his bri ef to request substance abuse treatment. Appellant is represented by counsel, and he is not entitled to hybrid repre sentation. See Ex parte Bohannan , 350 S.W.3d 1 16, 116 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 201 1). Acco rdingly, ap pellant’s pro se
motion is DENIED without prejudice.
/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
§ 1605.3 Calculating, posting, and charging breakage on errors involving investment in the wrong fund. ( a ) The TSP record keeper will calculate and post breakage on date of birth errors that result in default investment in the wrong L Fund, investment election errors, and fund reallocation and fund transfer errors.
( b ) The TSP record keeper will charge the employing agency for positive breakage on incorrect dates of birth caused by employing agency error that result in default investment in the wrong L Fund. A date of birth change received from an employing agency will not trigger corrective action other than to update the date of birth. To initiate a breakage calculation for an employee, the employing agency must notify the TSP record keeper that the participant is entitled to breakage.
( c ) If a uniformed services participant's retirement system is misclassified and the error results in default investment in the wrong fund, when the error is corrected pursuant to § 1605.14(f)-(g), the TSP record keeper will charge the employing agency for any positive breakage that results from the incorrect default investment. The retirement misclassification correction received from an employing agency will not trigger corrective action other than to update the participant's retirement system coverage. To initiate a breakage calculation for the uniformed service member, the employing agency must notify the TSP record keeper that the participant is entitled to breakage.
[80 FR 57069, Sept. 22, 2015, as amended at 82 FR 60104, Dec. 19, 2017; 87 FR 31676, May 24, 2022]
§ 1650.42 How to obtain a financial hardship withdrawal. ( a ) To request a financial hardship withdrawal, a participant must initiate a request in the form and manner prescribed by the TSP record keeper.
( b ) There is no limit on the number of financial hardship withdrawals a participant can make; however, the TSP record keeper will not accept a financial hardship withdrawal request for a period of six months after a financial hardship disbursement is made.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1596 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1596

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2003

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2318 Woodson Road in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``Timothy Michael 
                    Gaffney Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2318 
Woodson Road in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Timothy Michael Gaffney Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Timothy Michael Gaffney Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 6, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Tami Donald, Jerry Moore, and Summit Spring Water Company, Inc., Appellant s

No. 06

- 15

- 00052

- CV v.

Brian Rhone, BMR Distributing, Inc., Chris Rhone, and Rhone Water Company, Inc.

d/b/a Frost y ’ s Water, Appellee s Appeal from the 336th District Court of Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 38803 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court ’ s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of the

court below. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause for further

proceedings

. We further order that the appell ee s
, Brian Rhone, BMR Distributing, Inc., Chris Rhone,

and Rhone Water Company, Inc. d/b/a Frosty ’ s Water , pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED APRIL 14, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### § 11.5 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of CEO

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Gateway, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Gateway), does hereby certify that:



| | a) |  | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) of Gateway fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gateway.
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                        
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Dated: August 6, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/     WAYNE R.
INOUYE                
|                      |  |     |  | Wayne R. Inouye Chief Executive Officer
July 31 , 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

SEAN JACK SUTTON , Appellant
NO. 14

- 12

- 00548

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.
We further order this decision certified below for obs ervance.
### §6204. Delegation

In order to carry out sections 6202 and 6203 of this chapter, the Director may delegate to any authority of the executive branch of the Federal Government the responsibility for carrying out such sections. The Director shall oversee the activities of any authority to which responsibilities are delegated under this section and shall monitor the compliance of each authority with respect to the requirements set forth in section 6205.

(Added Pub. L. 99–547, §2(a), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3059.)