alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 11.7 Distilled spirits and other alcoholic beverages imported in bottles and similar containers; regulations of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms.

The importation of distilled spirits and other alcoholic beverages in bottles and similar containers is subject to regulations of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms relating to strip stamps and other matters. (27 CFR parts 5, 201, and 251). Customs officers and employees shall perform such functions as are necessary or proper on their part to carry out such regulations.

[28 FR 14701, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 78-329, 43 FR 43454, Sept. 26, 1978]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-115 September 15, 2004

NRC PROPOSES TOUGHER EXPORT-IMPORT REQUIREMENTS

 FOR HIGH-RISK RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is proposing tougher licensing requirements for the export

or import of high-risk radioactive materials that could be used in so-called “dirty bombs” or other

terrorist weapons. 

“This action is an important part of the government’s effort to protect the American people

from the malevolent use of radioactive materials while continuing to permit their peaceful use in a

wide range of industries and medicine,” Commission Chairman Nils J. Diaz said. 

“The United States has taken the lead in persuading the international community to strengthen

the control of high-risk radioactive materials that could conceivably fall into the hands of our

adversaries,” Diaz added. “This proposed regulation is another step by the Commission to protect the

common defense and security at home and abroad from the threat of radiological terrorism.”

The proposed rule would implement export-import provisions of the Code of Conduct on the

Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources adopted last year by the International Atomic Energy

Agency. The United States played a key role in developing the Code of Conduct and, at U.S. urging,

the Group of Eight Industrial Nations agreed at their June 2004 summit in Sea Island, Ga., to

implement the Code’s export-import provisions by December 2005.

The new NRC regulations would require specific licenses for all exports and imports of highrisk radioactive materials (in sealed sources or in bulk) as defined in the proposed rule. The proposed

rule’s lists of nuclear materials and radioactivity levels of concern are essentially identical to those

found in the Code of Conduct. Anyone in the United States wishing to export or import these

materials would be required to apply for NRC approval. Under current NRC regulations, these

radioactive materials may be exported or imported under a general license, which does not require

filing an application to the NRC or the issuance of licensing documents.

Comments on the changes will be accepted for 75 days following publication of the proposed

rule in the Federal Register, expected shortly. Comments should include the identification number

RIN 3150-AH44 in the header or subject line. Comments may be mailed to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. 
They may be e-mailed to: SECY@nrc.gov , via the NRC’s rulemaking Web site at

http://ruleforum.llnl.gov , or through the Federal Rulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov . 

Comments may also be hand-delivered to 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, between 7:30

a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on federal workdays.

###
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: : NO. 479

:

AMENDMENT OF RULE 103 : JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION

OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF :

JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION : DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 3

rd day of February, 2017, the proposal having been submitted

without publication pursuant to Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(a)(3):

It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania 

that Rule 103 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Judicial Administration is amended in the 

attached form. 

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and

shall be effective immediately.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
Editorial Note on Part 354
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 354 appear at 63 FR 24403, May 4, 1998, and at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

§ 354.14 Initial decision. ( a ) *Initial decision.* The presiding official, if a hearing was requested, or the Deputy Under Secretary will submit an initial decision to the APO Sanctions Board, providing copies to the parties. The presiding official or Deputy Under Secretary will ordinarily issue the decision within 20 days of the conclusion of the hearing, if one was held, or within 15 days of the date of service of final written submissions. The initial decision will be based solely on evidence received into the record, and the pleadings of the parties.
( b ) *Findings and conclusions.* The initial decision will state findings and conclusions as to whether a person has violated an administrative protective order; the basis for those findings and conclusions; and whether the sanctions proposed in the charging letter, or lesser included sanctions, should be imposed against the charged or affected party. The presiding official or Deputy Under Secretary may impose sanctions only upon determining that the preponderance of the evidence supports a finding of violation of an administrative protective order and that the sanctions are warranted against the charged or affected party. In determining whether sanctions are appropriate and, if so, what sanctions to impose, the presiding official or the Deputy Under Secretary will consider the nature of the violation, the resulting harm, and other relevant circumstances of the case.
( c ) *Finality of decision.* If the APO Sanctions Board has not issued a decision on the matter within 60 days after issuance of the initial decision, the initial decision becomes the final decision of the Department.
Jul 1, 2015 Hazardous Liquid | Gas Distribution | Gas Transmission Gathering | Liquefied Natural Gas
YEAR NUMBER OF

RECORDS PIPE

TOTAL SYSTEM TYPE:

PETROLEUM / REFINED PRODUCTS SYSTEM TYPE: HVLs SYSTEM

TYPE: CRUDE OIL SYSTEM

TYPE: CO2 OR OTHER SYSTEM TYPE:

FUEL GRADE ETHANOL 2004 420 166,669 62,391 51,794 49,264 3,221 2005 443 166,760 62,899 51,284 48,732 3,846 2006 453 166,719 61,905 52,533 48,453 3,827 2007 460 169,846 62,091 54,382 49,488 3,884 2008 471 173,789 61,599 57,024 50,963 4,203 2009 483 175,965 61,803 57,233 52,737 4,192 2010 483 181,974 64,787 57,980 54,631 4,560 16 2011 494 183,568 64,117 58,599 56,100 4,735 16 2012 519 186,209 64,029 59,861 57,463 4,840 16 2013 555 192,414 63,533 62,768 60,902 5,195 16 Export Table

Note: A. After 2009 information is from Part I Miles of Pip e by Decade Installed on Form PHMSA F7000-1.1(06-11). B. 2009-2004 information is from Part D Miles of Pipe by Decade Installed on Form PHMSA F7000-1.1(03-07). Enter Search Term(s): 

### Search 

# Annual Report Mileage for Hazardous Liquid or Carbo n Dioxide Systems

Back to Top Home | Careers | Contact Us | FAQs | Privacy Policy | FOIA | Accessibility | Web Policies | Site Map

Regulations.gov | USA.gov | WhiteHouse.gov | DOT.gov | | | Contact Us | FAQs | Site Map

Home» Pipeline Safety Community» Library» Accident Incident and Mileage Summary Statistics



### About PHMSA Pipeline Safety Hazardous Materials Safety 

# Page 1 of 2 PHMSA - Accident Incident and Mileage Summary Statistics - Annual Report Mileage fo ...

7/26/2015 http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/pipeline/library/data - stats/annual - report - mileage - for - hazardous - ...

# Page 2 of 2

PHMSA - Accident Incident and Mileage Summary Statistics - Annual Report Mileage fo ...

7/26/2015 http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/pipeline/library/data - stats/annual - report - mileage - for - hazardous - ...
### §9309. Priority of sureties

When a person required to provide a surety bond given to the United States Government is insolvent or dies having assets insufficient to pay debts, the surety, or the executor, administrator, or assignee of the surety paying the Government the amount due under the bond—

(1) has the same priority to amounts from the assets and estate of the person as are secured for the Government; and

(2) personally may bring a civil action under the bond to recover amounts paid under the bond.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1049.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9309 | 31:193. | R.S. §3468. |

In the section, before clause (1), the words "person required to provide a surety bond" are substituted for "principal in any bond" for clarity and consistency. The words "dies having assets insufficient to pay debts" are substituted for "whenever, such principal being deceased, his estate and effects which come to the hands of his executor, administrator, or assignee, are insufficient for the payment of his debts" to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "and, in either of such cases", "on the bond", and "such surety, his executor, administrator, or assignee" are omitted as unnecessary. Clause (1) is substituted for "shall have the like priority for the recovery and receipt of the moneys out of the estate and effects of such insolvent or deceased principal as is secured to the United States" to eliminate unnecessary words and for clarity. In clause (2), the words "and maintain" are omitted as surplus. The words "civil action" are substituted for "suit" for consistency. The words "in law or equity" are omitted as surplus.
§ 2422.28 When is a runoff election required? ( a ) *When a runoff may be held.* A runoff election is required in an election involving at least three (3) choices, one of which is “no union” or “neither,” when no choice receives a majority of the valid ballots cast. However, a runoff may not be held until the Regional Director has ruled on objections to the election and determinative challenged ballots.
( b ) *Eligibility.* Employees who were eligible to vote in the original election and who are also eligible on the date of the runoff election may vote in the runoff election.
( c ) *Ballot.* The ballot in the runoff election will provide for a selection between the two choices receiving the highest and second highest number of votes in the election.
#### William I. Cohen, Respondent, *v.*Douglas L. Elliman & Co., Inc., Appellant, and Nathaniel R. Caine, Proposed Party Respondent.

First Department,

December 4, 1951.

*Alexander Pfeiffer*of counsel *(Clarence 8. Barasch*with bim on the brief; *Pfeiffer & Crames,*attorneys), for appellant.

*Max ZucJcer,*attorney *(Stanley ZucJcer*with him on the brief), for plaintiff-respondent.

*George P. Halperin*of counsel *(David A. Sabo*with bim on the brief; *Barron, Bice & BocJcmore,*attorneys), for Nathaniel B. Caine, respondent.

*162*Per Curiam.*

Two real estate brokers in sequence, first Cohen and secondly Caine, are each claiming 50% of the commissions received by a third broker, defendant-appellant, in connection with the sale of a hotel. Cohen claims he brought the seller to defendant and was promised and is entitled to 50% of the commissions ; Caine claims he brought the purchaser to the defendant and was promised and is entitled to 50% of the commissions. Between them they demand 100%. Defendant denies any liability to either claimant.

To have before the court at the same time all claimants to the commissions payable in connection with one and the same transaction of purchase and sale, Caine should be added as a party. By the amendments to sections 192 and 193 of the Civil Practice Act the practice for joining new or additional parties has been liberalized, “ as justice may require.” In the interest of substantial justice, the motion should be granted.

The order appealed from should be reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant and the motion granted.

Settle order providing for service of additional required pleadings.

Peck, P. J., G-lennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant and the motion granted. Settle order on notice providing for service of additional required pleadings.
COMPACT SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION)

The new combined silencer and SCR unit 

developed by Wärtsilä is an ideal package for 

retrofitting projects.

This Compact SCR offers the following 

benefits:

• Modular and compact design enables 

installation on the place of existing 

silencer.

• NOx reduction 80 - 90 %

• Sound attenuation 25 - 35 dB(A)

• Minimized size

Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) 

significantly reduces NOx emissions. As a 

result, only harmless substances normally 

found in the air that we breath are released. 

SCR is currently the most efficient method 

of NOx -reduction. A reducing agent, such 

as an aqueous solution of urea, is injected 

into the exhaust gas at a temperature of 

300 - 450 oC. The urea in the exhaust gas 

decays into ammonia, which subsequently 

acts as a reducing agent in the SCR reactor to 

convert NOx into harmless nitrogen and water. 

The SCR method reduces NOx emission by 

80 - 90 %. Hence, it is easy to reach a NOxlevel of 2g/kWh or lower, which complies with 

the most stringent levels at sea.

SCR technology

A typical SCR plant consists of a reactor, 

containing several catalyst layers, a dosing 

and storage system for the reagent, and a 

control system. The SCR reactor is a square 

steel container large enough to house the 

layers of catalytic elements. 

Compact SCR concept for medium-speed engine 

installations
WARTSILA.COM

WÄRTSILÄ® is a registered trademark. Copyright © 2008 Wärtsilä Corporation.

Wärtsilä Corporation

Kauppapuistikko 15, FIN-65100 Vaasa, Finland l Tel. +358 (0)10 709 0000 

l Fax +358 (0)10 709 2422

The parameter for controlling the amount of 

urea injected is the engine load. To achieve 

more accurate control, the injection can be 

linked to a feedback NOx analyzer after the 

catalyst. The rate of NOx reduction depends 

on the amount of urea injected which can 

be expressed as the ratio of NH3 to NOx. 

The reduction rate can also be increased by 

increasing the catalyst volume.

If an exhaust gas boiler and/or SOx

scrubber are specified, they should be 

installed after the SCR, since the SCR requires 

a relatively high operating temperature.

The lifetime of the catalyst elements is 

typically 3 - 5 years for liquid fuels and slightly 

longer if the engine is operating on gas. The 

main running costs of the catalyst come 

from urea consumption and replacement of 

catalyst layers. The urea consumption is about 

20 - 25 g/kWh of 40 wt-% urea. 

The size of the urea tank depends on the 

size of the engine, the load profile and how 

often the ship will be entering harbours where 

urea is available.

Compact SCR technology is available for 

all engines in the Wärtsilä portfolio and for any 

engine from other engine suppliers. Today we 

have delivered around 90 SCRs for marine 

applications, including SCR systems for 

newbuildings and compact SCRs for retrofits.

Victoria I, a passenger ferry with four Wärtsilä Vasa 16V32 

main engines and three Wärtsilä Vasa 6R32 auxiliary 

engines uses Wärtsilä compact SCR.

Installation of a Compact SCR

WFI0005 Issue 2 GB Oct 2008
|   | (1) | the      10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |      /s/      Lonnie D.      Schnell                                                                      Lonnie      D. SchnellChief      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal      Executive Officer and Principal Financial  Officer) |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Federal Register: September 30, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 189)]
[Notices]               
[Page 60432]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr30se10-56]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID DOD-2010-OS-0120]

 
Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records; Correction

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On September 23, 2010 (75 FR 55907), DoD published a notice 
that cited an incorrect Air Force system name. This notice corrects 
that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Cindy Allard at (703) 588-6830.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction

    In the notice published on September 23, 2010, in FR Doc. 2010-
23791, on page 57907, in the first column, under the heading 
``Corrections'', in lines 13 and 14, remove the system name 
``Applications for Appointment and Extended Active Duty Files'' and add 
in its place ``Military Personnel Records System''.

    Dated: September 27, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-24552 Filed 9-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
§ 111.16 Denial of a license. ( a ) *Notice of denial.* If the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade, determines that the application for a license should be denied for any reason, notice of denial will be given by him or her to the applicant and to the processing Center. The notice of denial will state the reasons why the license was not issued.
( b ) *Grounds for denial.* The grounds sufficient to justify denial of an application for a license include, but need not be limited to: ( 1 ) Any cause which would justify suspension or revocation of the license of a broker under the provisions of § 111.53;
( 2 ) The failure to meet any requirement set forth in § 111.11;
( 3 ) A failure to establish the business integrity and financial responsibility of the applicant;
( 4 ) A failure to establish the good character and reputation of the applicant;
( 5 ) Any willful misstatement or omission of pertinent facts in the application or interview for the license;
( 6 ) Any conduct which would be deemed unfair or detrimental in commercial transactions by accepted standards;
( 7 ) A reputation imputing to the applicant criminal, dishonest, or unethical conduct, or a record of that conduct; or
( 8 ) Any other relevant information uncovered over the course of the background investigation.
[CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63314, Oct. 18, 2022]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

Pursuant to section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the question of whether an instrument of equivalent scientific value, for the purposes for which the instrument shown below is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the United States.

Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and be filed within 20 days with the Statutory Import Programs Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. Applications may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Suite 4100W, U.S. Department of Commerce, Franklin Court Building, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

*Docket Number:*                     04-019.                     *Applicant:*                     Texas A & M Research Foundation, 3578 TAMU—Dulie Bell Bldg., College Station, TX 77843-3578.                     *Instrument:*                     Scanning Hall Probe Microscope.                     *Manufacturer:*                     NanoMagnetics Instruments Ltd., United Kingdom.                

*Intended Use:*                     The instrument is intended to be used to investigate:                

1. The magnetic field properties of mesoscopically patterned thin films and nanostructured clusters of single magnet molecules for use as dense magnetic memories and in quantum computing.

2. The influence of periodic or randomly varying magnetic fields on the properties of thin films of superconductors, ordinary conductors, semiconductors and other magnetic materials at temperatures as low as 2 K.

3. The development of magnetic microstructures for diamagnetic levitation and manipulation of small particles and droplets.

The Instrument will also be used in courses on microscale magnetic field properties. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: October 7, 2004.

Gerald A. Zerdy, 

Program Manager, Statutory Import Programs Staff.

[FR Doc. 04-23955 Filed 10-25-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
### §644. Advice and assistance by Government departments and agencies; expenditure of funds

Departments and agencies of the Government are authorized to advise and assist the Secretary of the Interior, upon his request, in carrying out the provisions of this chapter and may expend their funds for such purposes, with or without reimbursement, in accordance with such agreements as may be necessary.

(Pub. L. 85–701, §4, Aug. 21, 1958, 72 Stat. 701.)