alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 688

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1616

[Report No. 108–332] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 25, 2004

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of July 22, 2004, by Mr. 

DOMENICI, without amendment 

AN ACT

To authorize the exchange of certain lands within the Martin 

Luther King, Junior, National Historic Site for lands 

owned by the City of Atlanta, Georgia, and for other 

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Martin Luther King, 

5 Junior, National Historic Site Land Exchange Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. 

7 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
2

•HR 1616 RS 

1 (1) Public Law 96–438 established the Martin 

2 Luther King, Junior, National Historic Site, and al3 lows acquisition, by donation only, of lands owned by 

4 the State. 

5 (2) The National Park Service owns a vacant 

6 lot that has no historic significance. The City of At7 lanta has expressed interest in acquiring this prop8 erty to encourage commercial development along 

9 Edgewood Avenue. 

10 (3) The National Historic Site Visitor Center 

11 and Museum is land-locked and has no emergency 

12 ingress or egress, making it virtually impossible for 

13 firefighting equipment to reach. 

14 (4) The acquisition of city-owned property 

15 would enable the National Park Service to establish 

16 easy street access to the National Historic Site Vis17 itor Center and Museum, and would benefit the City 

18 by exchanging a piece of property that the City 

19 could develop. 

20 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to author21 ize the exchange of certain lands within the Martin Luther 

22 King, Junior, National Historic Site for lands owned by 

23 the City of Atlanta, Georgia. 
3

•HR 1616 RS 

1 SEC. 3. LAND EXCHANGE. 

2 Section 2(b)(1) of the Act of October 10, 1980 (Pub3 lic Law 96–428; 94 Stat. 1839; 16 U.S.C. 461 note) is 

4 amended by striking the period and inserting ‘‘or ex5 change.’’. 
Calendar No. 688

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1616

[Report No. 108–332] 

AN ACT

To authorize the exchange of certain lands within 

Georgia, and for other purposes. toric Site for lands owned by the City of Atlanta, the Martin Luther King, Junior, National HisAUGUST 25, 2004

Reported without amendment
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     Each person whose signature appears below authorizes Paul R. Skubic,
Chairman of the Board and President, to execute in the name of each such person
who is then an officer or director of the registrant, and to file, the 2004
Harris Preferred Capital Corporation Annual Report to the Securities and
Exchange Commission on Form 10-K pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.



     /s/ DAVID BLOCKOWICZ                    /s/ DELBERT WACKER
     -----------------------                 -----------------------
     David Blockowicz                        Delbert Wacker
     Director                                Director




     /s/ FRANK M. NOVOSEL                    /s/ FORREST M. SCHNEIDER
     -----------------------                 -----------------------
     Frank M. Novosel                        Forrest M. Schneider
     Director                                Director




     /s/ PAUL R. SKUBIC
     -----------------------
     Paul R. Skubic
     Director
### Voluntary Surrender o f Section 333 Exemption and COAs Dave [publisher@gasecuritymagazine.onmicrosoft.com] Dear Administrator, With immediate effect, Planehook Aviation Servic es, LLC voluntarily surr enders its Section 333 exemption, certificate 2016 ­ CSA ­ 14695 ­ 659 ­ 333E (Regulatory Docket No. FAA ­ 2015 ­ 4858, Exemption #14695, FAA ltr Feb 5, 2016), its associated Blan ket COA, and COA for the San Antonio, Texas area (2016 ­ CSA ­ 14695 ­ 659 ­ 333E, dated Jun 23, 2016). Pl anehook Aviation Services, LLC believes itself to be in full compliance with and will continue flight oper ations in accordance wi th 14 CFR 101 and 14 CFR 107. I am pleased to continue to cham pion sUAS flight safety as a FAA Safety Team Representative. Sincerely, Dave Hook David C. Hook, CFII, ATP, RP/sUAS President Planehook Aviation Services, LLC T LSC# B17127 Sent : Wednesday , October 05, 2016 2:04 PM To: 9-AJV-115-UASOrganization (FAA); 9-AWA-AVS- 333Exemptions (FAA); 9-AFS-UAS-Inquiries (FAA) Page 1 of 1 Voluntary Surrender of Section 333 Exemption and COAs

11 /21 /201 6 https://email.dot.gov/owa/ 9 -AWA -AV S -333Exemptions@faa.gov/? ae=Item&t=IPM.Not...
### **CHAPTER 20—POLLUTION OF THE SEA BY OIL**
§ 2412.8 Accountings of disclosures and requests for accountings. ( a ) The FLRA's Solicitor or IG, as appropriate, will maintain a record (“accounting”) of every instance in which records about an individual are made available, pursuant to this part, to any person other than: ( 1 ) Officers or employees of the Authority, the General Counsel, the IG, or the Panel in the performance of their duties; or
( 2 ) Any person pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 552.
( b ) The accounting which shall be retained for at least five (5) years or the life of the record, whichever is longer, shall contain the following information: ( 1 ) A brief description of records disclosed;
( 2 ) The date, nature and, where known, the purpose of the disclosure; and
( 3 ) The name and address of the person or agency to whom the disclosure is made.
( c ) Except when accountings of disclosures are not required to be kept (as stated in paragraph (a) of this section) or are withheld accounting of disclosures that were made pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(7), you may make a request for an accounting of any disclosure that has been made by the Solicitor or IG, to another person, organization, or agency of any record about you. This accounting contains the date, nature, and purpose of each disclosure, as well as the name and address of the person, organization, or agency to which the disclosure was made. Your request for an accounting should identify each particular record in question and should be made by writing to the FLRA's Solicitor or IG, as appropriate, following the procedures in § 2412.5.
( d ) The FLRA's Solicitor or IG, as appropriate, will respond to your request for access to an accounting following the procedures in § 2412.7. You may appeal the Solicitor or IG's decision on your request under the procedures in § 2412.12.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-062 May 20, 2004

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET JUNE 2 - 4 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards will hold a

public meeting from June 2 - 4 in Rockville, Maryland. The committee’s discussions will include,

among other items, the NRC’s revised process for reactor license renewal and the agency staff’s

response to the Committee’s March 17 report on the AP1000 advanced reactor design.

Most of the meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North

building, at 11545 Rockville Pike. A session with the Commission, from 1:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. on June

2, will be held in the Commissioners’ Conference Room in One White Flint North. The meeting will

begin at 8:30 a.m. each day.

A complete agenda will be available on the NRC’s Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2004/ . Videoconferencing is available

for observing open sessions of ACRS meetings, at the cost of the requesting individual or organization,

by contacting the Committee’s audio/visual technician at 301-415-8066, between 7:30 a.m. and 3:45

p.m., at least 10 days before the meeting.

For additional information, please contact Sam Duraiswamy, at 301-415-7364, between 7:30

a.m. and 4:15 p.m.

###
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2343

___________

Judith Walther, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Everest & Jennings, Inc.; Everest & *

Jennings International, Ltd., * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Defendants - Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: December 11, 1997

Filed: January 12, 1998

___________

Before WOLLMAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After losing $55,000,000 in 1993, Everett & Jennings, Inc. (EJI), merged with

Medical Composite Technologies (MCT). Though EJI was the surviving company,

MCT’s owner became the chief executive officer of the merged businesses. In

February 1984, EJI terminated Judith Walther as its Vice-President of International

Sales and Marketing, the stated reason being that the company in retrenching would

concentrate its efforts on domestic sales. Walther commenced this action against EJI

and a subsidiary, alleging age and sex discrimination.
The HONORABLE DONALD J. STOHR, United States District Judge for the 1

Eastern District of Missouri.

-2-

The district court granted summary judgment in favor of EJI, concluding that

1

undisputed facts demonstrate (1) Walther was terminated as part of a reduction-in-force

resulting from legitimate economic concerns; (2) she produced no evidence satisfying

the additional showing of unlawful discrimination that is required to establish a prima

facie case of discrimination in reduction-in-force cases, see Nitschke v. McDonnell

Douglas Corp., 68 F.3d 249, 251 (8th Cir. 1995); and (3) even if she established a

prima facie case, Walther presented no probative evidence that EJI’s legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for discharge was a pretext for intentional age or sex

discrimination. Walther appeals. After careful de novo review of the record and the

district court’s analysis, we conclude that the court’s conclusions are well supported

by the summary judgment record. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### §2220. Rivers and harbors and other waterways projects for benefit of navigation, flood control, hurricane protection, beach erosion control, and other purposes

#### (a) Congressional declaration of policy; purchase of indebtedness and loans to local interests to meet contribution requirements

In the prosecution of projects for rivers and harbors and other waterways for the benefit of navigation, the control of destructive flood waters, hurricane protection, beach erosion control, and for other purposes, authorized to be prosecuted under the direction of the Secretary of the Army under the supervision of the Chief of Engineers in accordance with plans adopted and authorized by the Congress, it is hereby declared to be the policy of the Congress, that whenever such projects are located wholly or partially within an area which is eligible for financial assistance under the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 [42 U.S.C. 3121 et seq.], the Secretary of Commerce is authorized to purchase evidences of indebtedness and to make loans for a period not exceeding fifty years to enable responsible local interests to meet the requirements of local cooperation pertaining to contributions toward the cost of construction of such projects within such areas.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section, not to exceed $10,000,000 per fiscal year for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1966, and for each fiscal year thereafter through and including the fiscal year ending June 30, 1970.

(Pub. L. 89–298, title II, §217, Oct. 27, 1965, 79 Stat. 1088.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 89–136, Aug. 26, 1965, 79 Stat. 552, which is classified generally to chapter 38 (§3121 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3121 of Title 42 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3142a of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

Section was not enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.
#### § 1650.24 How to obtain a post-employment distribution.

To request a post-employment distribution, a participant must initiate a request in the form and manner prescribed by the TSP record keeper.
Exhibit 32


    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         OF TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC.
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in the capacity indicated below,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with this Annual Report on Form 10-K, that:

    1.  the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

    2.  the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the Company's financial condition and results of
        operations, as of the dates and for the periods presented in the
        financial statements included in such report.





/s/ Michael R. Sand                         /s/ Dean J. Brydon
----------------------------                ---------------------------
Michael R. Sand                             Dean J. Brydon
Chief Executive Officer                     Chief Financial Officer


Dated: December 10, 2010

<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,470
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,470
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              116
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,900
<OTHER-SE>                                         750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,970
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,600)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,600)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
From: Inspire 1 <beta@dji.com>

Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2015 11:01 PM

To: Rowland, Jason

Subject: You are accepted to DJI Inspire 1 Beta testing

Dear Jason,

Your application has been reviewed and we are pleased to inform you that you have been accepted! You will receive an 

E-mail within the next few days when the beta is ready to begin. In the event that the project is full, you will be placed on an 

"Alternates" team in case there is a future opening.

In the meantime please bookmark this site as it will be your primary communication portal during the beta period.

Thank you for your interest,

The Inspire 1 Beta Team

Page 1 of 1

file:///C:/Program%20Files%20(x86)/Documentum/CTS/docbases/ProDocbase/config/temp_sessions/335141679... 7/10/2015
### §3722. Claims of officers and employees at Government penal and correctional institutions

(a) The Attorney General may settle and pay not more than $1,000 in any one case for a claim made by an officer or employee at a United States Government penal or correctional institution for damage to, or loss of, personal property incident to employment.

(b) A claim may not be allowed under this section if the loss occurred at quarters occupied by the claimant that were not assigned or provided in kind by the Government.

(c) A claim may be allowed only if—

(1) no part of the loss was caused by any negligent or wrongful act of the claimant or an agent or employee of the claimant;

(2) the Attorney General decides that possession of the property was reasonable or useful under the circumstances; and

(3) it is presented in writing within one year after it accrues.

(d) A claim may be paid under this section only if the claimant accepts the amount of the settlement in complete satisfaction of the claim.

(e) Necessary amounts are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 974.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3722(a) | 31:238(1st sentence). | June 10, 1949, ch. 187, 63 Stat. 167. |
| 3722(b) | 31:238(2d sentence last 25 words before last semicolon). | |
| 3722(c) | 31:238(2d sentence less last 25 words before last semicolon). | |
| 3722(d) | 31:238(last sentence). | |
| 3722(e) | 31:238(note). | |

In subsection (a), the words "and such other officer or officers as he may designate for such purpose" are omitted as unnecessary because of 28:509. The word "settle" is substituted for "consider, determine, adjust" for consistency. The words "the sum of" are omitted as surplus. The words "officer or employee" are substituted for "persons employed" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The words "or destruction" are omitted as surplus.

In subsection (b), the words "assigned to him . . . otherwise" are omitted as surplus.

In subsection (c)(1), the words "no part" are substituted for "not . . . in whole or in part" because of the restatement.

In subsection (c)(2), the words "the Attorney General decides that possession of" are substituted for "is determined" for clarity. The words "claimed to be damaged, lost, or destroyed" and "necessary, or proper . . . attendant" are omitted as surplus.

In subsection (c)(3), the word "accrues" is substituted for "the occurrence of the accident or incident out of which such claim arises" to eliminate unnecessary words.

In subsection (d), the words "A claim may be paid under this section" are added for clarity. The words "the amount of the settlement" are substituted for "an award hereunder" for consistency. The words "in complete satisfaction of the claim" are substituted for "shall release the United States, its agents or employees, from any further claim by such claimant arising out of the same incident" to eliminate unnecessary words.
### §7301. Purpose

It is the purpose of this chapter to ensure that—

(1) block grant amounts are allocated for programs of special importance to meet the needs of local governments, residents of local governments, and other eligible entities; and

(2) all eligible local governments, residents of local governments, and other eligible entities are treated fairly in distributing block grant amounts.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1039.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7301 | 31:1243(note). | Aug. 13, 1981, Pub. L. 97–35, §1741(a), 95 Stat. 762. |

In the chapter, the words "chief executive officer" are added for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.

In the section, before clause (1), the words "It is the purpose of this chapter" are added for clarity and consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the Code. The words "each State which receives block grant funds under this Act shall comply with the requirements of this chapter, to the extent that such funds may be used at the discretion of the State, as described in subsection (b)(1)(B)" are omitted as surplus and because of the restatement of the source provisions in section 7302 of the revised title. In clause (2), the words "urban and rural" are omitted as surplus.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. I-05-007 February 10, 2005

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NOTE - - MEETING TIME HAS BEEN CHANGED TO BEGIN ONE HOUR LATER 

 MEETING IS NOW SCHEDULED TO BEGIN AT 2:00 p.m.

* * * * * *

NRC OFFICIALS TO MEET WITH PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL

TO DISCUSS OVERSIGHT OF RADIATION SAFETY PROGRAM

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will meet with officials of Good Samaritan Regional

Medical Center on Wednesday, February 16, to discuss oversight of the radiation safety program at the

Pottsville, Pa., facility. 

During an NRC inspection at Good Samaritan in November, 12 apparent violations were

identified and are being considered for escalated enforcement by the NRC. NRC inspectors observed

that the hospital does not actively oversee its brachytherapy program and has relied on a single

authorized user and a consultant to ensure the program is in compliance with NRC regulations. In a

letter sent to the hospital forwarding the inspection report, George Pangburn, Director of the Region I

Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, said the apparent violations indicated “an inadequate control” of

the hospital’s brachytherapy program. (Brachytherapy is a radiation therapy in which radioactive

material - “seeds” - are placed in the body to treat a variety of cancers and other diseases.) The

apparent violations did not cause danger to the public or patients. 

 The meeting, called a predecisional enforcement conference, will begin at 2:00 p.m.,

rescheduled from 1:00, in the Public Meeting Room at the NRC Region I Office, 475 Allendale Road

in King of Prussia. During the conference, the licensee will be given the opportunity to address the

apparent violations. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be available

at the conclusion of the meeting to answer any questions.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that a

determination has been made that violations have occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. 

The purpose is to discuss the apparent violations, causes and safety significance, to provide the

licensee with an opportunity to point out any errors in the NRC inspection report and to enable the

company to outline its corrective actions.
2

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action, such as a civil

penalty, will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a later time. 

If issued, the enforcement action will be available online in the NRC’s electronic reading room

at: www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/regulatory/enforcement/current.html#materials. The details of the

apparent violation are described in an NRC letter to the facility, which can be accessed online at: 

www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html by entering accession number ML050280105 as a

search term.

###