alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-04-034 August 9, 2004

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

 NRC ASSIGNS NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

 TO COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION

Zachary Dunham has been assigned as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s senior

resident inspector at the Columbia Generating Station near Richland, WA. Dunham succeeds

George Replogle.

“Zach Dunham’s commitment to safety will help the NRC monitor Columbia Generating

Station to ensure that it meets the high safety standards we insist upon for all reactors operating

in the United States.” said NRC Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallett. 

Since June 2003, Zachary has served as the resident inspector at the Columbia Generating

Station and assumed the duties and responsibilities of the senior resident inspector position

earlier this month. Previously, he served as the resident inspector at the Kewaunee Nuclear

Power Plant in Wisconsin.

Zachary joined the U.S. Navy in 1988 as a machinist mate. He was selected for a naval

officer commissioning program and in 1993 he received his Bachelor’s degree in physics from

Oregon State University. Zachary then served as an officer aboard nuclear powered submarines

until 1998.

Each of the country’s commercial nuclear power plants has assigned NRC resident

inspectors who serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections,

monitoring significant work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. The

resident inspectors at Columbia can be reached at 509-377-2627.

###
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-61469-CIV-SMITH/VALLE

AKAI CUSTOM GUNS, LLC, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

KKM PRECISION, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Valle’s Report and Recommendation

to District Judge [DE 288] (“Report”), in which she recommends granting Defendant, KKM 

Precision, Inc.’s Unopposed Motion to Tax Costs [DE 266]. Neither party has filed objections to 

the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation 

and the record, it is

ORDERED that

1. Magistrate Judge Valle’s Report and Recommendation to District Judge [DE 288] 

is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this Court’s Order.

2. Defendant, KKM Precision, Inc.’s Unopposed Motion to Tax Costs [DE 266] is 

GRANTED. 

3. Defendant, KKM Precision, Inc. is awarded $11,711.96 in costs with interest 

accruing at the statutory rate. See 28 U.S.C. § 1961. 

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 17th day of April, 2024.

cc: counsel of record

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 289 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2024 Page 1 of 1
#### Force *vs.*The City of Elizabeth.

1. Equity, in relieving against the loss of a bond payable to bearer,, makes no discrimination against loss by theft.

2. A court of equity is not ousted of an.y part of its original jurisdiction! by the fact that a court of law exercises the same or *s>*similar jurisdiction.

Bill for relief and general demurrer.

*Mr. R. E. Chetwood,*for demurrer.

*Mr. B. Gummere,*for complainant.

The Chancellor.

The complainant, on the 21st of January, 1872, was the owner of two bonds payable to the bearer thereof, executed and issued by the defendanh^one for $500 and the other for $1000, each payable with interest. The interest was payable on the presentation of coupons or warrants, also payable to: the bearer thereof, attached to the bonds. The bonds, with, the coupons attached, were, on the day above mentioned,, stolen from the vault of the Trenton Banking Company,, where the complainant had deposited them for' safe keeping. She gave notice by advertisement of her loss;, but tailed h> recover either the bonds or the coupons. In April,, 1875, she. tendered to the defendant proper indemnity,, and demanded payment of the principal and interest of the bond for $500,, the principal of which was then due, and of the interest due on the other bond. The principal of that bond was not due. Payment was refused. She subsequently instituted this suit, *409to compel the defendant to pay to her the amount due, and to-become due during the pendency of this suit, on the bonds,, offering to indemnify the defendant against loss or damage by reason of the payment, in such manner and with such sureties as this court might direct. In support of the demurrer, the-defendant’s counsel insists that the complainant is not entitled to relief in equity, because the loss alleged in the bill was through theft, and the bonds and coupons were not due at the-time when they were stolen, and were of the character of negotiable paper; and further, because she has an adequate-remedy at law. Neither of these grounds is tenable. Equity,, in relieving against the loss of such instruments as these bonds,, makes no discrimination against loss by theft. If the complainant has a remedy at law, it is by virtue of the statutory provision that *“*in an action upon any negotiable instrument which is lost, or upon any plea or notice of set-off founded on such instrument, the fact that such instrument was lost while-negotiable by delivery or otherwise, shall not prevent a recovery thereon in a court of law; but a court of law shall give judgment in the same manner as if such note was not lost, and may take the same order thereon as a court of equity would to indemnify the party charged against the payment thereof.” *Revision*688, § 7. Apart from the question suggested, whether the use of the word note, in the latter clause of the section above quoted, does not limit the power given by the section to suits upon or set-offs of lost .promissory notes, it is enough to say that this court is not ousted of any part of its original jurisdiction by the fact that a court of law exercises the same or a similar jurisdiction.

The demurrer will be overruled, with costs.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-053 March 24, 2005

NRC ANNOUNCES AVAILABILITY OF

LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR MONTICELLO

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced today that an application for a 20-year renewal

of the operating license for the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant is available for public review.

The Monticello plant is located approximately 30 miles northwest of Minneapolis, Minn., and

its current operating license expires on Sept. 9, 2010.

The licensee, Nuclear Management Company, submitted the renewal application March 24. It

will be available on the NRC Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications.html .

The NRC staff is currently conducting an initial review of the application to determine whether

it contains enough information for the required formal review. If the application has sufficient

information, the NRC will formally “docket,” or file, the application and will announce an opportunity

to request a public hearing.

For further information, contact Daniel Merzke, Division of Regulatory Improvement

Programs, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Mail Stop O11F1, Washington, D.C. 20555; Telephone (301) 415-3777.

###
### §1414c. Prohibition on disposal of sewage sludge at landfills on Staten Island

#### (a) In general

No person shall dispose of sewage sludge at any landfill located on Staten Island, New York.

#### (b) Exclusion from penalties

#### (1) In general

Subject to paragraph (2), a person who violates this section shall not be subject to any penalty under this Act.

#### (2) Injunction

Paragraph (1) shall not prohibit the bringing of an action for, or the granting of, an injunction under section 1415 of this title with respect to a violation of this section.

#### (c) "Sewage sludge" defined

For purposes of this section, the term "sewage sludge" has the meaning such term has in section 1414b of this title.

(Pub. L. 92–532, title I, §104C, as added Pub. L. 100–688, title I, §1005, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4150.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), means Pub. L. 92–532, which is classified generally to this chapter, chapter 41 (§2801 et seq.) of this title, and chapters 32 (§1431 et seq.) and 32A (§1447 et seq.) of Title 16, Conservation.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 42 (Monday, March 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 14091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04860]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Public Availability of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 
(EEOC) FY 2012 Service Contract Inventory

AGENCY: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Public Availability of FY 2012 Service Contract 
Inventories.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), Equal 
Employment Opportunity Commission is publishing this notice to advise 
the public of the availability of the FY 2012 Service Contract 
inventory. This inventory provides information on service contract 
actions over $25,000 that were made in FY 2012. The information is 
organized by function to show how contracted resources are distributed 
throughout the agency. The inventory has been developed in accordance 
with guidance issued on November 5, 2010 by the Office of Management 
and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). OFPP's 
guidance is available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/procurement-service-contract-inventories. The Equal Employment Opportunity 
Commission has posted its inventory and a summary of the inventory on 
the EEOC homepage at the following link: http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/doingbusiness/index.cfm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the service 
contract inventory should be directed to Doreen Starkes in the 
Acquisition Services Division at (202) 663-4240 or 
DOREEN.STARKES@EEOC.GOV.

    Dated: February 21, 2013.
Patrick R. Mealy,
Director, Acquisition Services Division.
[FR Doc. 2013-04860 Filed 3-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 159

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93023, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 159.5 Cigars, cigarettes, and cigarette papers and tubes.

The internal revenue taxes imposed on cigars, cigarettes, and cigarette papers and tubes under section 5701 or 7652, Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (26 U.S.C. 5701 or 7652), are determined in accordance with section 5703 of that Code (26 U.S.C. 5703) at the time of removal; that is, on the quantity removed from Customs custody under the entry or withdrawal for consumption. The Customs duties, unlike those on alcoholic beverages, do not necessarily apply only to such quantities.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10-g    
  


AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.

EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE EXCHANGE PLAN  


        This
Amendment No. 1, effective as of November 1, 2002, amends the following provisions of the Executive Incentive Exchange Plan of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. (the
"Exchange Plan"): 



	1.
	Article VII
of the Exchange Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows: 



Exchanges
made under this Plan will be made following the close of the Plan year on the date that the Committee meets to finalize the MIP awards for such Plan year. Such date shall be referred to as
the "Exchange Date." 



	2.
	Article VIII
of the Exchange Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows: 





The
effective date of the stock options granted under the Plan will be the Exchange Date. 



	3.
	Attachment
I to the Exchange Plan is amended by deleting the phrase "last day of Plan Year" wherever it appears and substituting therefor the words "Exchange Date." 




        This
Amendment has been adopted effective as of November 1, 2002. 









QuickLinks



Exhibit 10-g
§ 2610.107 Allowable fees and expenses. ( a ) Awards will be based on rates customarily charged by persons engaged in the business of acting as attorneys, agents and expert witnesses, even if the services were made available without charge or at reduced rate to the applicant.
( b ) Except as provided in § 2610.108, no award for the fee of an attorney or agent under these rules may exceed $125.00 per hour. No award to compensate an expert witness may exceed the highest rate at which the Office pays expert witnesses. However, an award may also include the reasonable expenses of the attorney, agency, or witness as a separate item, if the attorney, agent or witness ordinarily charges clients separately for such expenses.
( c ) In determining the reasonableness of the fee sought for an attorney, agent or expert witness, the adjudicative officer shall consider the following: ( 1 ) If the attorney, agent or witness is in private practice, his or her customary fees for similar services, or, if an employee of the applicant, the fully allocated costs of the services;
( 2 ) The prevailing rate for similar services in the community in which the attorney, agent or witness ordinarily performs services;
( 3 ) The time actually spent in the representation of the applicant;
( 4 ) The time reasonably spent in light of the difficulty or complexity of the issues in the proceeding; and
( 5 ) Such other factors as may bear on the value of the services provided.
( d ) The reasonable cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, project or similar matter prepared on behalf of a party may be awarded, to the extent that the charge for the services does not exceed the prevailing rate for similar services, and the study or other matter was necessary for preparation of applicant's case.
[57 FR 33268, July 28, 1992, as amended at 63 FR 13116, Mar. 18, 1998]
### §3079–1. Limitation on educational assistance

#### (a) In general

Each fiscal year, beginning with the fiscal year in which this Act is enacted, the Secretary of Commerce shall ensure that the total amount expended by the Secretary under section 3077 of this title (as added by section 201(a)), section 3078 of this title (as added by section 202(a)), and section 3079 of this title (as added by section 203(a)) does not exceed the amount by which—

(1) the total amount the Secretary would pay in that fiscal year to officer candidates under section 203(f)(1) of title 37 (as added by section 305(d)), if such section entitled officer candidates to pay at monthly rates equal to the basic pay of a commissioned officer in the pay grade O–1 with less than 2 years of service, exceeds

(2) the total amount the Secretary actually pays in that fiscal year to officer candidates under section 203(f)(1) of such title.

#### (b) Officer candidate defined

In this section, the term "officer candidate" has the meaning given the term in paragraph (4) of section 3002(b) of this title, as added by section 305(c).

(Pub. L. 116–259, title II, §204, Dec. 23, 2020, 134 Stat. 1165.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The fiscal year in which this Act is enacted, referred to in subsec. (a), means the fiscal year in which Pub. L. 116–259, which added this section, was enacted. Pub. L. 116–259 was approved Dec. 23, 2020.

Sections 201(a), 202(a), 203(a), and 305 (c) and (d), referred to in text, mean those respective sections of Pub. L. 116–259.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Commissioned Officer Corps Amendments Act of 2020, and not as part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Commissioned Officer Corps Act of 2002 which comprises this chapter.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED,

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Multimedia Games, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Clifton E. Lind, Chief Executive Officer, and Craig S. Nouis, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that, based upon my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 16, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    CLIFTON E. LIND 
|                      |  |  |  | Clifton E. Lind        
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | /s/    CRAIG S. NOUIS  
|                      |  |  |  | Craig S. Nouis         
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Multimedia Games, Inc. and will be retained by Multimedia Games, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §1321c. International efforts on enforcement

The Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating, in consultation with the heads of other appropriate Federal agencies, shall ensure that the Coast Guard pursues stronger enforcement in the International Maritime Organization of agreements related to oil discharges, including joint enforcement operations, training, and stronger compliance mechanisms.

(Pub. L. 111–281, title VII, §709, Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 2986.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2010, and not as part of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act which comprises this chapter.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-009 January 12, 2005

NRC EXTENDS OPPORTUNITY TO REQUEST USE OF NEW STANDARD

FOR ADDRESSING EXISTING FIRE PROTECTION ISSUES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has extended, to Dec. 31, 2005, the date for nuclear

power plant operators to request use of a new, optional fire protection standard to resolve existing

issues with a plant’s fire protection plans.

The new standard, which focuses resources on issues of the greatest risk significance, was

announced in July 2004 and is described in a press release on the NRC’s Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2004/04-076.html . Nuclear power plant

operators originally had until Jan. 16 to request the new standard be applied to existing issues.

“The NRC concluded the extension protects public health and safety, since nuclear plant

operators must have the means to compensate for any existing problems to be dealt with under the

standard,” said Sunil Weerakkody, Chief of the Fire Protection Engineering Section in the NRC’s

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

The Nuclear Energy Institute asked the NRC, in July 2004, to extend the deadline to Dec. 31 to

allow for adequate planning and budgeting by plant operators. NRC staff considered possible safety

implications, the need to start bringing fire-protection issues to closure, and other factors before

agreeing to the extension.

The NRC’s decision, and a companion Enforcement Policy revision, are outlined in a Federal

Register notice, to be published shortly. The revised policy will be available on the NRC Web site at

this address: http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/regulatory/enforcement/enforc-pol.pdf . The NRC’s

Public Document Room (phone 800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737) can help interested persons obtain

these materials.

###
§ 2424.50 Illustrative criteria. A compelling need exists for an agency rule or regulation concerning any condition of employment when the rule or regulation was issued by the agency or any primary national subdivision of the agency, and the agency demonstrates that the rule or regulation satisfies one of the following illustrative criteria: ( a ) The rule or regulation is essential, as distinguished from helpful or desirable, to the accomplishment of the mission or the execution of functions of the agency or primary national subdivision in a manner that is consistent with the requirements of an effective and efficient government.
( b ) The rule or regulation is necessary to ensure the maintenance of basic merit principles.
( c ) The rule or regulation implements a mandate to the agency or primary national subdivision under law or other outside authority, which implementation is essentially nondiscretionary in nature.
[63 FR 66413, Dec. 2, 1998, as amended at 88 FR 62460, Sept. 12, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,654
<SECURITIES>                                     8,364
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,514
<ALLOWANCES>                                       145
<INVENTORY>                                        857
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,962
<PP&E>                                          78,523
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,456
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,383
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,731
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           118
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,383
<SALES>                                         82,022
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                82,022
<CGS>                                           57,305
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,305
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,227
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,390
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                       945
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,155
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    933
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       222
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>