alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Antenna TV S.A. (the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Nikolaos Angelopoulos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (a)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Nikolaos Angelopoulos
-------------------------------
Name: Nikolaos Angelopoulos
Title:  Chief Financial Officer


Date: March 31, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                               75,562
<SECURITIES>                         71,008
<RECEIVABLES>                        53,214
<ALLOWANCES>                           (750)
<INVENTORY>                          52,901
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    287,428
<PP&E>                               88,867
<DEPRECIATION>                       35,892
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      368,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                86,343
<BONDS>                             172,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                 28
<OTHER-SE>                          105,004
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        368,624
<SALES>                              43,378
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     43,409
<CGS>                                28,395
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        28,698
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     14,197
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    2,807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (479)
<INCOME-TAX>                            758
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (1,489)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         (1,489)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.05)


</TABLE>
#### Frieda Rader et al., Appellants, v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Company of Philadelphia, Penna., et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Present — Callahan, J. P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of CEO

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Gateway, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Gateway), does hereby certify that:



| | a) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Form 10-Q) of Gateway fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gateway.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 10, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    WAYNE R. INOUYE
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                        | 
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Wayne R. Inouye Chief Executive Officer
### §1817. Transfer of discontinued apparatus to other branches

The Architect of the Capitol may transfer apparatus, appliances, equipments, and supplies of any kind, discontinued or permanently out of service, to other branches of the service of the United States, or District of Columbia, whenever, in his judgment the interests of the Government service may require it.

(June 26, 1912, ch. 182, §11, 37 Stat. 184; Mar. 3, 1921, ch. 124, 41 Stat. 1291; May 29, 1928, ch. 901, §1(120), 45 Stat. 995; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 654, §3(17), 65 Stat. 708.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 171 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

Section is based on section 11 of act June 26, 1912, popularly known as the "District of Columbia Appropriation Act June 26, 1912, fiscal year 1913".

#### Prior Provisions

Act Mar. 2, 1911, ch. 192, §9, 36 Stat. 1011.

#### Amendments

1951—Act Oct. 31, 1951, struck out "with the approval of the Secretary of the Interior," after "whenever,".

1928—Act May 29, 1928, struck out provision that required a transfer statement to be submitted in the annual report to Congress by the Superintendent of the Capitol Building and Grounds.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Change of name of Architect of the Capitol, functions abolished, transferred, etc., by prior acts, see Prior Provisions and Change of Name notes set out under former section 1801 of this title.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-98-44 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)

NRC STAFF ISSUES REPORT ON PERFORMANCE

AT CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Performance Is Good With Improvements In All Areas Assessed

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued a Systematic Assessment of

Licensee Performance (SALP) report on Florida Power Corporation’s commercial nuclear

power plant at Crystal River, Florida which notes good performance and improvements in

all areas assessed.

Performance at Crystal River Unit 3 was evaluated in four functional areas for a period

from October 6, 1996 through May 9, 1998. The original SALP period was scheduled to

end on October 6, 1997 but was extended so that it would include this past January’s plant

restart and several months of operation following an extended outage

The areas of Plant Operations and Engineering improved from Category 3 (adequate)

to Category 2 (good). Performance in the areas of Maintenance and Plant Support

remained in Category 2 from the last SALP rating, but the report noted indications of

performance improvement in elements of each area.

In a letter to Florida Power Corporation, Luis A. Reyes, administrator of the NRC’s

Region II office in Atlanta, said performance improvement at Crystal River resulted in large

part from the ability the plant demonstrated over the last half of the assessment period to

identify problems and to take “appropriate and effective corrective actions.”

NRC officials will discuss the report with FPC management in a public meeting to be

held at the plant training center in Crystal River at 11:00 a.m. on July 2. The meeting will

be open to observation by interested members of the public and the news media. NRC

officials will hold a short news conference at its conclusion to answer questions from

observers who attend.

#
#### § 190.111 Drawback allowance.

Section 309 of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1309), provides for drawback on articles laden as supplies on certain vessels or aircraft of the United States or as supplies including equipment upon, or used in the maintenance or repair of, certain foreign vessels or aircraft.
#### NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, et al., Plaintiffs—Appellees, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., Defendants—Appellees, v. The American Farm Bureau Federation, et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors—Appellants.

No. 01-17292.

D.C. No. CV-99-03701-WHA.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 13, 2002.

Decided May 23, 2002.

Before HAWKINS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges and RESTANI, Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Jane A. Restani, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) sued the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) alleging that the EPA failed to timely reassess pesticide tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 346a(q). The district court allowed the American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) to intervene. NRDC and the EPA entered into a consent decree resetting missed interim statutory deadlines and the district court approved the consent decree. Intervenor AFBF appeals the district court’s approval of the consent decree alleging that the district court exceeded its jurisdiction and abused its discretion by approving the consent decree. We dismiss the appeal because intervenor AFBF lacks standing to appeal the approval of the consent decree.

To appeal the district court’s final order resolving this action, intervenor AFBF must establish constitutional standing. *Diamond v. Charles,*476 U.S. 54, 68, 106 S.Ct. 1697, 90 L.Ed.2d 48 (1986); *Idaho Farm Bureau Fed’n. v. Babbitt,*58 F.3d 1392, 1398 (9th Cir.1995); *Didrickson v. United States Dep’t. of Interior,*982 F.2d 1332, 1338 (9th Cir.1992). Thus, AFBF must establish that: (1) it has suffered an injury in fact (2) that is fairly traceable to the challenged action and (3) that the injury will likely be redressed by the requested relief. *Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife,*504 U.S. 555, 560-61, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992); *Idaho Farm, Bureau Fed’n.,*58 F.3d at 1398-99. AFBF’s alleged injury, that AFBF will lose rights to sell, purchase or use safe pesticides, is speculative, not likely to be caused by the interim deadlines in the consent decree and not likely to be cured if this court sets aside the consent decree. The regulatory process will proceed with notice and comment and AFBF retains its right to challenge unfavorable decisions once the EPA makes final re-registration decisions. Thus, AFBF lacks standing to challenge the district court’s approval of the consent decree setting interim deadlines.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
### **CHAPTER 53—HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOM AND HYPOXIA RESEARCH AND CONTROL**

Sec.
4001.
Assessments.
4001a.
Consultation required.
4002.
National harmful algal bloom and hypoxia program.
4003.
Comprehensive research plan and action strategy.
4004.
Northern Gulf of Mexico hypoxia.
4004a.
South Florida harmful algal blooms and hypoxia.
4005.
Great Lakes hypoxia and harmful algal blooms.
4006.
Protection of States' rights.
4007.
Effect on other Federal authority.
4008.
Definitions.
4009.
Authorization of appropriations.
4010.
Hypoxia or harmful algal bloom of national significance.
§ 151.111 Permissible activities. ( a ) All State or local officers or employees are free to engage in political activity to the widest extent consistent with the restrictions imposed by law and this part. A State or local officer or employee may participate in all political activity not specifically restricted by law and this part, including candidacy for office in a nonpartisan election and candidacy for political party office.
[40 FR 42733, Sept. 16, 1975]
Exhibit 32.2


                           GREG MANNING AUCTIONS, INC.
                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Greg Manning Auctions,
Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2003, I, Larry Crawford, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Greg Manning Auctions, Inc., hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   this Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies
          with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended
          December 31, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
          financial condition and results of operations of Greg Manning
          Auctions, Inc.


Dated:   February 3, 2004
                                    /s/ Larry Crawford
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    Larry Crawford, Executive Vice President
                                    and Chief Financial Officer
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-109 August 8, 2005

ENERGY BILL PROVIDES FOR ENHANCED SECURITY

AT COMMERCIAL NUCLEAR FACILITIES

The energy bill signed today by President Bush contains provisions long sought by the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission to enhance security at nuclear power plants and other facilities, including

authorization for licensee security guards to use more powerful weaponry and more extensive

background checks for personnel with access to nuclear materials or safeguards information.

“This wide-ranging legislation enhances our ability to ensure the protection of public health,

safety and the common defense,” said NRC Chairman Nils J. Diaz. “These provisions will make an

industry that is already well protected even safer from the threats of terrorism and radiological

sabotage.”

Under this legislation, the NRC will for the first time have regulatory authority over additional

radioactive materials, including certain sources of radium-226 and materials produced in accelerators

rather than in reactors.

The energy bill also contains specific security-related requirements that in large degree address

measures already initiated by the NRC. These include revisions to the agency’s design basis threat

through rulemaking and establishment of a national tracking system for radioactive sources in the

United States.

The act also expands criminal penalties for anyone bringing in unauthorized weapons or

explosives or committing sabotage at nuclear power plants and other licensee facilities designated by

the NRC.

Other provisions in the bill will facilitate NRC’s recruitment of engineers, scientists, security

experts and other professionals at a time when the agency anticipates a greatly increased workload due

to potential applications for new commercial power reactors and the proposed Yucca Mountain waste

repository. The NRC is now authorized to support university programs for academic fields critical to

the agency’s regulatory activities and to establish partnership programs with minority institutions of

higher learning. NRC may also award financial assistance to undergraduate and graduate students in

return for subsequent employment with the NRC.

###
§ 148.52 Exemption for household effects used abroad. ( a ) *Exemption.* Furniture, carpets, paintings, tableware, books, libraries, and other usual household furnishings and effects actually used abroad for not less than 1 year by resident or nonresidents, and not intended for any other person or for sale may be allowed entry free of duty and tax under subheading 9804.00.05, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202). Household effects used abroad not less than 1 year by a family of which the importer was a resident member for not less than 1 year during the period of use may be allowed free entry whether or not the importer owned the effects at the time of such use. The year of use need not be continuous, nor need it immediately precede the time of importation.
( b ) *Proof of use.* In order to obtain free entry for household effects under this section, the use of the effects abroad for 1 year must be proven to the satisfaction of the port director. The port director, in his discretion, may require evidence of use other than the declaration provided for in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Declaration.* When household effects are claimed to be free of duty a declaration of the owner on Customs Form 3299, or its electronic equivalent, shall be required to support the claim for free entry. If it is impracticable to produce the declaration at the time of entry, the importer may give a bond on Customs Form 301, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.62 of this chapter, for the production of the owner's declaration within 6 months.
( d ) *Arrival of effects more than 10 years after arrival of importer.* As a general rule, household effects arriving more than 10 years after the last arrival of the importer from the country in which the effects were used shall not be admitted free of duty under this exemption unless the port director is satisfied from the importer's explanation that the effects were unavoidably detained beyond the 10-year period. However, in no case shall free entry be allowed under this provision when a period of 25 years or more has elapsed since the last arrival of the importer in the United States from the country in which the effects were used.
[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41186, Oct. 19, 1984; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51265, Dec. 21, 1988; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61291, Oct. 13, 2015]
§ 2430.2 Proceedings affected; eligibility for award. ( a ) The provisions of this part apply to unfair labor practice proceedings pending on complaint against a labor organization at any time since October 1, 1981.
( b ) A respondent in an unfair labor proceeding which has prevailed in the proceeding, or in a significant and discrete portion of the proceeding, and who otherwise meets the eligibility requirements of this section, is eligible to apply for an award of attorneys fees and other expenses allowable under the provisions of § 2430.4 of these rules. ( 1 ) Applicants eligible to receive an award in proceedings conducted by the Authority are any partnership, corporation, association, or public or private organization with a net worth of not more than $5 million ($7 million in cases involving adversary adjudications pending on or commenced on or after August 5, 1985) and not more than 500 employees.
( 2 ) For the purpose of eligibility, the net worth and number of employees of an applicant shall be determined as of the date the complaint was issued.
( 3 ) The employees of an applicant include all persons who regularly perform services for remuneration for the applicant, under the applicant's direction and control. Part-time employees shall be included on a proportional basis.
( 4 ) An applicant that participates in a proceeding primarily on behalf of one or more other persons or entities that would be ineligible is not itself eligible for an award.
[46 FR 48623, Oct. 2, 1981, as amended at 51 FR 33837, Sept. 23, 1986]
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-04-022 April 5, 2004

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

 

NRC TO MEET WITH TVA NUCLEAR OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS

 SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT WATTS BAR NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Tennessee Valley Authority

officials on Friday, April 9, to discuss the results of NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at

the Watts Bar nuclear power plant near Spring City, Tennessee. 

The meeting will be held at 2:00 p.m. at the Best Western Motel at 1421 Murray’s Chapel

Road, in Sweetwater, Tennessee, just off I-75 at Exit 60. The public is invited to observe the

meeting, and NRC officials will be available before its conclusion to answer any questions.

The NRC told TVA that plant safety performance during the previous year forms the basis for

the meeting discussions. The NRC said that Watts Bar operated safely and that plant performance was

at a level requiring no additional NRC inspection beyond normal. A letter from NRC to TVA

detailing the results of the evaluation is available from Region II Public Affairs and on the NRC web

site at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/wb_2003q4.pdf . The NRC said the

NRC staff, in addition to the normal inspections at Watts Bar, will conduct additional inspections at

Watts Bar of the plant’s implementation of any new security Orders and any new security

requirements. The NRC will also continue to inspect the lay-up and preservation of Watts Bar Unit 2,

which has been deferred by TVA and has not received an operating license.

.

 Current performance indicators for Watts Bar Unit 1 are available at 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/WB1/wb1_chart.html . 

###
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation 

Santa Monica, California 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-150210, No. 333-115392 and No. 333-143173) and Form S-8 (No. 333-70478, No. 333-96563, No. 333-104227 and No. 333-129528) of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation of ourreport dated March 12, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements which appear in this Form 10-K. 

BDO Seidman, LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

March 12, 2009