alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2414.9 Penalties and enforcement. ( a ) Where the nature and circumstances of a prohibited communication made by or caused to be made by a party to the proceeding are such that the interests of justice and statutory policy may require remedial action, the Authority, Administrative Law Judge, or Regional Director, as appropriate, may issue to the party making the communication a notice to show cause, returnable before the Authority, Administrative Law Judge, or Regional Director, within a stated period not less than seven (7) days from the date thereof, why the Authority, Administrative Law Judge, or Regional Director should not determine that the interests of justice and statutory policy require that the claim or interest in the proceeding of a party who knowingly makes a prohibited communication or knowingly causes a prohibited communication to be made, should be dismissed, denied, disregarded or otherwise adversely affected on account of such violation.
( b ) Upon notice and hearing, the Authority may censure, suspend, or revoke the privilege of practice before the agency of any person who knowingly and willfully makes or solicits the making of a prohibited ex parte communication. However, before the Authority institutes formal proceedings under this subsection, it shall first advise the person or persons concerned in writing that it proposes to take such action and that they may show cause, within a period to be stated in such written advice, but not less than seven (7) days from the date thereof, why it should not take such action.
( c ) The Authority may censure, or, to the extent permitted by law, suspend, dismiss, or institute proceedings for the dismissal of, any Authority agent who knowingly and willfully violates the prohibitions and requirements of this rule.
(,$ 2SHQ 'DWD  4E  86 (QHUJ\ ,QIRUPDWLRQ $GPLQLVWUDWLRQ (,$

KWWSZZZHLDJRYRSHQGDWDTEFIP"VGLG 1*51*:++'$ 

$3, &$//

72 86(

KWWSDSLHLDJRYVHULHV"DSLBNH\ <285B$3,B.(<B+(5(	VHULHVBLG 1*51*:++'$

6(5,(6

1$0(

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO *DV 6SRW 3ULFH $QQXDO

6(5,(6

,'

1*51*:++'$

6KRZ PH KRZ WR HPEHG D FKDUW RI WKLV VHULHV

2SHQ 'DWD

$3, 4XHU\ %URZVHU

(,$ 'DWD 6HWV ! 1DWXUDO *DV ! 3ULFHV ! 1DWXUDO *DV 6SRW DQG )XWXUHV 3ULFHV 1<0(;

&KDUW 'DWD

6HULHV 1DPH 3HULRG )UHTXHQF\ 9DOXH 8QLWV

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO  $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ

'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ %WX

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO *DV 6SRW 3ULFH $QQXDO

6HULHV ,' 1*51*:++'$

        











6RXUFH (QHUJ\ ,QIRUPDWLRQ $GPLQLVWUDWLRQ
 (,$ 2SHQ 'DWD  4E  86 (QHUJ\ ,QIRUPDWLRQ $GPLQLVWUDWLRQ (,$

KWWSZZZHLDJRYRSHQGDWDTEFIP"VGLG 1*51*:++'$ 

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO

*DV 6SRW 3ULFH

$QQXDO

 $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ

%WX

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO

*DV 6SRW 3ULFH

$QQXDO

 $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ %WX

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO

*DV 6SRW 3ULFH

$QQXDO

 $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ %WX

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO

*DV 6SRW 3ULFH

$QQXDO

 $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ %WX

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO

*DV 6SRW 3ULFH

$QQXDO

 $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ %WX

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO

*DV 6SRW 3ULFH

$QQXDO

 $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ %WX

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO

*DV 6SRW 3ULFH

$QQXDO

 $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ %WX

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO

*DV 6SRW 3ULFH

$QQXDO

 $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ %WX

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO

*DV 6SRW 3ULFH

$QQXDO

 $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ %WX

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO

*DV 6SRW 3ULFH

$QQXDO

 $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ %WX

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO

*DV 6SRW 3ULFH

$QQXDO

 $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ %WX

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO

*DV 6SRW 3ULFH

$QQXDO

 $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ %WX

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO

*DV 6SRW 3ULFH

$QQXDO

 $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ %WX

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO

*DV 6SRW 3ULFH

$QQXDO

 $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ %WX

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO

*DV 6SRW 3ULFH

$QQXDO

 $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ %WX

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO

*DV 6SRW 3ULFH

$QQXDO

 $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ %WX

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO  $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ %WX
 (,$ 2SHQ 'DWD  4E  86 (QHUJ\ ,QIRUPDWLRQ $GPLQLVWUDWLRQ (,$

KWWSZZZHLDJRYRSHQGDWDTEFIP"VGLG 1*51*:++'$ 

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO

*DV 6SRW 3ULFH

$QQXDO

 $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ %WX

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO

*DV 6SRW 3ULFH

$QQXDO

 $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ %WX

+HQU\ +XE 1DWXUDO

*DV 6SRW 3ULFH

$QQXDO

 $  'ROODUV SHU 0LOOLRQ %WX
#### § 162.66 Penalties for unlading narcotic drugs or marihuana without a permit.

In every case where a narcotic drug or marihuana is unladen without a permit, the penalties prescribed in section 453, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1453), shall be assessed. Penalties shall be assessed under this section when a package of regular cargo or a passenger's baggage otherwise covered by a permit to unlade is found to contain any narcotic drug or marihuana imported for sale or other commercial purpose and not specifically covered by a permit to unlade.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NO. WR-82,911-01

EX P ARTE F RANCISCO DUR AN, JR, Applicant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 2012-DCR- 867-I IN THE 445th DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM CAM ERON COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Ap p l i ca n t wa s convicted of burg lary of a habi t at i o n with intent to commit ag g ravated assault and sentenc ed to twenty -five year s’ imprisonment. The Thirteenth Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Duran v. State , No. 13-12- 00344-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christ i–EdinburgJ uly 3, 2013) (not designated f or publication). Applicant contends that his a p p e ll a te c o u n s e l re n d e r e d ineffe ctive assistance beca use counsel failed to a dvise him of his right to file a pro sepetition for discre tionary revie w.2

Appellate counsel filed an aff idavit with the trial court. Ba sed on that aff idavit, the trial court has enter ed finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to advise Applicant of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionar y revie w. The trial court rec ommends that relief be grante d. Ex parte W

ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, there fore , that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionar

y revie w of the judgme nt of the T h i rt ee n t h Court of Appea ls in Cause No. 13-12- 00344-CR that aff

irmed his conviction in Cause No. 2012-DCR-867-I from the 445th District Court of Cameron County
. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionar y revie w with this Court within 30 day s of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Deliver ed: Marc h 25, 2015 Do not publish
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, John K. Henry,certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Duane Reade Inc. for thefiscal quarter ended March 27, 2004;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis quarterly report based on such evaluation;

c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

Date: May 16, 2005
| By:    | /s/ JOHN K.  HENRY |   | *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer* |
|--------|--------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   | John K. Henry      |   | *(Principal Accounting Officer)*                    |

 

 

1

----
### §613. Establishment of senior level positions

#### (a) In general

Notwithstanding the fourth sentence of section 601(b) of this title, the Director of the Congressional Budget Office may establish and fix the compensation of senior level positions in the Congressional Budget Office to meet critical scientific, technical, professional, or executive needs of the Office.

#### (b) Limitation on compensation

The annual rate of pay for any position established under this section may not exceed the annual rate of pay for level II of the Executive Schedule.

#### (c) Effective date

This section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2017 and each succeeding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 115–31, div. I, title I, §1101, May 5, 2017, 131 Stat. 578.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Level II of the Executive Schedule, referred to in subsec. (b), is set out in section 5313 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2017, which is div. I of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017, and not as part of title II of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 which comprises this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS AS FILED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         665,067
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  116,039
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    144,194
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               984,060
<PP&E>                                         446,514
<DEPRECIATION>                               (252,970)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,766,759
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          200,032
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    517,251
<COMMON>                                    13,299,427
<OTHER-SE>                                (12,261,180)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,766,759
<SALES>                                        401,272
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               401,272
<CGS>                                          273,629
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  273,629
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,086,707
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,077
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (761,686)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (762,486)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (762,486)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DONTAY RAYSHAW BREWER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 485 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of November, 2016

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Joyce McMillin Sturdivant v. The State of Texas

Appellate case numbers: 01-12-00089-CR; 01-12-00184-CR

Trial court case number: 2011-564-C2

Trial court: 54th District Court, McLennan County

On May 14, 2013, this Court issued its opinion affirming the judgment of the trial court. 

See Sturdivant v. State, No. 01-12-00089-CR, 2013 WL 1972179 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st 

Dist.] May 14, 2013, pet. granted). On October 9, 2013, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals 

vacated our judgment and remanded the case to this Court for reconsideration in light of Landers 

v. State, 402 S.W.3d 252 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). The Court of Criminal Appeals instructed us 

to “consider the effect of Landers, if any, on [our] reasoning and analysis in this case.” See 

Sturdivant v. State, No. PD-0759-13, 2013 WL 5538958 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 9, 2013) (per 

curiam). The case will be resubmitted for disposition in accordance with the opinion of the 

Court of Criminal Appeals.

As the Court of Criminal Appeals decided Landers after we issued our opinion in this 

case, the effect of that case was not addressed in the original briefs filed in this Court. On 

November 19, 2013, the State filed a supplemental brief on remand. If appellant wishes to file a 

supplemental brief on remand, it is due thirty days from the date of this order. See Bell v. State, 

956 S.W.2d 560, 561 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Theus v. State, 863 S.W.2d 489, 491 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1993) (per curiam).

The case will be set for submission at a future date, and the parties will be notified of the 

submission date.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: November 21, 2013
#### § 1620.1 Application.

The Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986 (codified as amended largely at 5 U.S.C. 8351 and 8401 through 8479) originally limited TSP eligibility to specifically named groups of employees. On various occasions, Congress has since expanded TSP eligibility to other groups. Depending on the circumstances, that subsequent legislation requires retroactive contributions or provides other special features. Where necessary, this part describes those special features. The employees and employing agencies covered by this part are also governed by the other regulations in 5 CFR chapter VI to the extent that they do not conflict with the regulations of this part.

[64 FR 31057, June 9, 1999, as amended at 70 FR 32213, June 1, 2005]
### §55. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 55 was editorially reclassified as section 6316 of this title.
### **CHAPTER 7—GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL ORGANIZATION

Sec.
701.
Definitions.
702.
Government Accountability Office.
703.
Comptroller General and Deputy Comptroller General.
704.
Relationship to other laws.
705.
Inspector General for the Government Accountability Office.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—GENERAL DUTIES AND POWERS

711.
General authority.
712.
Investigating the use of public money.
713.
Audit of Internal Revenue Service and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms. 1

714.
Audit of Financial Institutions Examination Council, Federal Reserve Board, Federal reserve banks, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Office of Comptroller of the Currency.
715.
Audit of accounts and operations of the District of Columbia government.
716.
Availability of information and inspection of records.
717.
Evaluating programs and activities of the United States Government.
718.
Availability of draft reports.
719.
Comptroller General reports.
720.
Agency reports.
721.
Access to certain information.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—PERSONNEL

731.
General.
732.
Personnel management system.
732a.
Critical positions.
733.
Senior Executive Service.
734.
Assignments and details to Congress.
735.
Relationship to other laws.
736.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—PERSONNEL APPEALS BOARD

751.
Organization.
752.
Chairman and General Counsel.
753.
Duties and powers.
754.
Action by the Comptroller General.
755.
Judicial review.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—ANNUITIES

771.
Definitions.
772.
Annuity of the Comptroller General.
773.
Election of survivor benefits.
774.
Survivor annuities.
775.
Refunds.
776.
Payment of survivor benefits.
777.
Annuity increases.
778.
Dependency and disability decisions.
779.
Use of appropriations.

#### SUBCHAPTER VI—PROPERTY MANAGEMENT

781.
Authority over the General Accounting Office Building.
782.
Leasing of space in the General Accounting Office Building.
783.
Rules and regulations.

#### SUBCHAPTER VII—CENTER FOR AUDIT EXCELLENCE

791.
Center for Audit Excellence.
792.
Account.
793.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2017**—Pub. L. 115–3, §2(d), Jan. 31, 2017, 131 Stat. 8, added item 721.

**2014**—Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1401(a)(2), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2541, added subchapter VII heading and items 791 to 793.

**2008**—Pub. L. 110–323, §5(c), Sept. 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 3547, added item 705.

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814, substituted "GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE" for "GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE" in chapter heading and "Government Accountability Office" for "General Accounting Office" in item 702.

**2000**—Pub. L. 106–303, §4(a)(3), Oct. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 1069, added item 732a.

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–272, §4(f)(1)(C), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1362, struck out "Sec." immediately above item 781.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–545, §2(a), Oct. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 2728, added subchapter VI heading and items 781 to 783.

1  Section catchline amended by Pub. L. 107–296 without corresponding amendment of chapter analysis.
EXHIBIT
      32.1













CERTIFICATION
      OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the Company)
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jean
      Paul
      Roy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the *Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002* ,
      that:





1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the*Securities
                Exchange Act of 1934*;
                and





2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.

















/s/
      Jean Paul Roy


Jean
      Paul
      Roy


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


November
      14, 2006
### §505. Army and Air Force schools and field exercises

Under such regulations as the President may prescribe and upon the recommendation of the governor of any State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands or of the commanding general of the National Guard of the District of Columbia, the Secretary of the Army may authorize a limited number of members of its Army National Guard to—

(1) attend any service school except the United States Military Academy, and to pursue a regular course of study at the school; or

(2) be attached to an organization of the branch of the Army corresponding to the organization of the Army National Guard to which the member belongs, for routine practical instruction at or near an Army post during field training or other outdoor exercise.

Similarly, the Secretary of the Air Force may authorize a limited number of members of the Air National Guard to—

(1) attend any service school except the United States Air Force Academy, and to pursue a regular course of study at the school; or

(2) be attached to an organization of the Air Force corresponding to the organization of the Air National Guard to which the member belongs, for routine practical instruction at an air base during field training or other outdoor exercise.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 611; Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title XII, §1234(b)(4), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2059; Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title X, §1057(b)(4), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3441.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 505 | 32:65. | June 3, 1916, ch. 134, §99 (1st 133 words); restated Sept. 22, 1922, ch. 423, §5 (1st 129 words); restated May 28, 1926, ch. 417, §3 (1st 133 words), 44 Stat. 674. |

The words "branch of the Army corresponding" are substituted for the words "same arm, corps, or department", to conform to sections 3063 and 3064 of title 10. In the second sentence, the words "organization of the Air Force corresponding" are substituted for the words "same arm, corps, or department", since the Air Force is not organized by statute into branches, arms, corps, or departments. The word "members" is substituted for the words "officers, warrant officers, and enlisted men". The words "service school" are substituted for the words "military-service school of the United States". Reference to the United States Air Force Academy is inserted to reflect its establishment by the Air Force Academy Act (63 Stat. 47).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–163 substituted "State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands" for "State or Territory or Puerto Rico" in introductory provisions.

1988—Pub. L. 100–456, which directed the substitution of "Territory or Puerto Rico" for "Territory, Puerto Rico, or the Canal Zone," in subsec. (a), was executed to the introductory provisions of this section as the probable intent of Congress.