alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

Exhibit 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION
I, Ronald Stewart, certify that:

    1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc.;

    2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

    3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

    4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

        a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
        b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

        c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registran's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

 Date: November 14, 2003  By: /s/ Ronald Stewart
                                  Ronald Stewart Chief Financial Officer
                                 (Principal Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)
```
#### § 2634.409 Pre-existing trusts.

An interested party may place a pre-existing irrevocable trust into a qualified trust, which may then be certified by the Office of Government Ethics. This arrangement should be considered in the case of a pre-existing trust whose terms do not permit amendments that are necessary to satisfy the rules of this subpart. All of the relevant parties (including the employee, any other interested parties, the trustee of the pre-existing trust, and all of the other parties and beneficiaries of the pre-existing trust) will be required pursuant to section 102(f)(7) of the Act to enter into an umbrella trust agreement. The umbrella trust agreement will specify that the pre-existing trust will be administered in accordance with the provisions of this subpart. A parent or guardian may execute the umbrella trust agreement on behalf of a required participant who is a minor child. The Office of Government Ethics has prepared model umbrella trust agreements that the interested party can use in this circumstance. The umbrella trust agreement will be certified as a qualified trust if all of the requirements of this subpart are fulfilled under conditions where required confidentiality with respect to the trust can be assured.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of King
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. I, Jefferson J. Gregory, Chief Executive Officer of King
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.       The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Date: July ___, 2003                             /s/ Jefferson J. Gregory
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 Jefferson J. Gregory
                                                 Chairman of the Board
                                                 and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      24,164,635
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,739,423
<ALLOWANCES>                                   459,417
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,285,580
<PP&E>                                       5,503,934
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,919,657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,056,206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,631,284
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,028
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,623,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,056,206
<SALES>                                     44,008,086
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            44,110,167
<CGS>                                       27,435,440
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               36,031,617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (851,862)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,603
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,912,809
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,148,343
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,764,466
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                             STATEMENT OF CONTROLLER
         PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Joel
H. Lurquin, the Controller of Donlar Corporation (the "Company"), hereby
certifies that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Company's Form 10-KSB Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2002
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 15, 2003               /s/ Joel H. Lurquin
                                    ----------------------------------------
                                    Joel H. Lurquin, Controller
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0028- Proposed Licenses to Export Nuclear Grade Graphite to Canada and Other Countries for Non-Nuclear End Use (XMAT0403 and XMAT0404, Respectively)

Accession Number: ML030550737

Date Released: Tuesday, March 4, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML030440020 - SECY-03-0028 - Proposed Licenses to Export Nuclear Grade Graphite to Canada and Other Countries for Non-Nuclear End Use (XMAT0403 & XMAT0404, Respectively). (6 page(s), 2/24/2003)
    - ML030560944 - SECY-03-0028 - Proposed Licenses to Export Nuclear Grade Graphite to Canada and Other Countries for Non-Nuclear End Use (Attachments) (40 page(s), 2/24/2003)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 27, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23979]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Initial Review 
Group Subcommittee E--Cancer Epidemiology, Prevention & Control.
    Date: December 9, 2004.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Marriott Bethesda North Hotel, 5701 Marinelli Road, 
Bethesda, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Mary C. Fletcher, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Research Programs Review Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, National 
Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Rm 8115, Bethesda, 
MD 20892, (301) 496-7413.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 19, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-23979 Filed 10-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 213.3201 Positions other than those of a confidential or policy-determining character for which it is not practicable to hold a competitive examination. ( a ) Upon specific authorization by OPM, agencies may make appointments under this section to positions which are not of a confidential or policy-determining character, and which are not in the Senior Executive Service, for which it is impracticable to hold open competition or to apply usual competitive examining procedures. Appointments under this authority are subject to the basic qualification standards established by the Office of Personnel Management for the occupation and grade level. Positions filled under this authority are excepted from the competitive service and constitute Schedule B. For each authorization under this section, OPM shall assign a number from 213.3202 through 213.3299 to be used by the appointing agency in recording appointments made under that authorization.
( b ) [Reserved]
[46 FR 20147, Apr. 3, 1981, as amended at 47 FR 57655, Dec. 28, 1982; 53 FR 15353, Apr. 29, 1988]
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1577

To designate the visitors’ center in Organ Pipe National Monument in Arizona 

as the ‘‘Kris Eggle Memorial Visitors’ Center’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2003

Mr. TANCREDO (for himself and Mr. HOEKSTRA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To designate the visitors’ center in Organ Pipe National 

Monument in Arizona as the ‘‘Kris Eggle Memorial Visitors’ Center’’, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

4 (a) FINDING.—Congress finds that in August 2002, 

5 Kris Eggle, a 28-year-old park ranger in Organ Pipe Na6 tional Monument, was murdered in the line of duty along 

7 the border between the United States and Mexico. 

8 (b) DEDICATION.—Congress dedicates the visitors’ 

9 center in Organ Pipe National Monument to Kris Eggle 
2

•HR 1577 IH 

1 and to promoting awareness of the risks taken each day 

2 by all public land management law enforcement officers. 

3 (c) REDESIGNATION.—The visitors’ center in Organ 

4 Pipe National Monument in Arizona is hereby designated 

5 as the ‘‘Kris Eggle Memorial Visitors’ Center’’. 

6 (d) REFERENCE.—Any reference to the visitors’ cen7 ter in Organ Pipe National Monument in Arizona, in any 

8 law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of 

9 the United States shall be considered to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Kris Eggle Memorial Visitors’ Center’’. 

11 (e) SIGNAGE.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 

12 post interpretive signs at the visitors’ center and at the 

13 trailhead of the Baker Mine-Milton Mine Loop that—

14 (1) describe the important role of public law en15 forcement officers in protecting park visitors; 

16 (2) refer to the tragic loss of Kris Eggle in un17 derscoring the importance of these officers; 

18 (3) refer to the dedication of the trail and the 

19 visitors’ center by Congress; and 

20 (4) include a copy of this Act and an image of 

21 Kris Eggle.

Æ
Employment Agreement



 
Exhibit 10.1

 
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO 
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment No. 3”) is made and entered into as of the 28th day of August, 2002, by and between THE PANTRY, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), and
PETER J. SODINI (the “Employee”). 
 
W I T N E S S E T H: 
 
WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Employee entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of October 1, 1997 (the “Original Agreement”); and 
 
WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Employee entered into
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement on April 1, 1999; and 
 
WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Employee entered into Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement on September 21, 2001; 
 
WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Employee desire to amend further the Original Agreement to provide for different severance
payments in the event the Employee’s employment is terminated after a Change in Control by the Corporation without Cause or by the Employee for Good Reason, as such terms are defined in the Original Agreement as set forth hereinafter; and

 
WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Employee
desire to amend further the Original Agreement to provide for a change in Section 7 of the Original Agreement which addresses moving expenses. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms and conditions set forth below and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
 
1.    In Section 6.2, Termination Following Change-in-Control, the phrase “eighteen months” in the first paragraph shall be deleted and the phrase “twenty-four
(24) months” shall be inserted such that the clause shall read, “Employee shall be entitled to salary continuance together with regular benefits for twenty-four (24) months from the date of the termination of his employment . . . .”

 
2.    In Section 7,
Moving Expenses, the phrase “to California” shall be deleted and the phrase “to any location of Employee’s choice in the continental United States” shall be inserted in lieu thereof. 
 
3.    Except as amended hereby,
the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. 
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed as of the day and year set forth above. 
 

	  THE PANTRY, INC.

	
	  By:
	  	    /s/    STEVEN J.
FERRIERA


	  	  	  Name:  Steven J. Ferriera
  Title:    Sr. Vice President, Administration

	
	  /s/    PETER J.
SODINI


	  PETER J. SODINI
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-111 August 16, 2005

NRC REVISES SCHEDULE FOR REVIEWING

EXISTING EARLY SITE PERMIT APPLICATIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is extending the review schedules for the three Early Site

Permit applications received in late 2003.

Given the unexpected volume of comments on Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) and

other factors, the NRC staff plans to finalize its review of the North Anna site (near Louisa, Va.) by

late December, about four months later than originally scheduled. The review of the Grand Gulf site

(near Vicksburg, Miss.) should be finalized by mid-April 2006, also about four months later than first

planned. The review of the Clinton site (near Clinton, Ill.) should be finalized by late July 2006, about

nine months later than planned. The staff’s draft safety evaluation reports and draft EIS on all three

ESP applications were issued in accordance with the originally established schedule.

Public comments on the draft EIS for the North Anna ESP site were much more numerous than

anticipated when the NRC allocated resources for ESP reviews. The number of public comments on

draft statements for the Clinton and Grand Gulf ESP sites also exceeded expectations.

“Public participation is an important part of the NRC’s licensing process, and we want to

ensure these comments are appropriately addressed in the sites’ final EIS,” said David Matthews,

Director of the Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs in the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation.

The ESP process allows an applicant to address site-related issues, such as environmental

impacts, for possible future construction and operation of a nuclear power plant at the site. If a permit

is granted, the applicant has up to 20 years to decide whether to build a new nuclear unit on the site and

to file an application with the NRC for approval to begin construction.

Notwithstanding these delays, the NRC’s revised review completion dates of mid-2006 should

have no impact on the applicants’ ability to reference an ESP, if one is issued, in Combined Operating

License applications expected in the 2008 time frame.

###
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93024, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 173.2 Transactions which may be reviewed and corrected. The Center director may review transactions for correctness, and take appropriate action under his general authority to correct errors, including those in appraisement where appropriate, at the time of: ( a ) Liquidation of an entry;
( b ) Voluntary reliquidation completed within 90 days after liquidation;
( c ) Voluntary correction of an exaction within 90 days after the exaction was made;
( d ) Reliquidation made pursuant to a valid protest covering the particular merchandise as to which a change is in order; or
( e ) Modification, pursuant to a valid protest, of a transaction or decision which is neither a liquidation or reliquidation.
### §2106. Savings clauses

#### (a) Tennessee Valley Authority jurisdiction

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as replacing or superseding section 831y–1 of title 16.

#### (b) State jurisdiction

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as extending or diminishing the jurisdiction or authority of any State over the siting, construction, monitoring, or managing of artificial reefs within its boundaries.

(Pub. L. 98–623, title II, §208, Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3398.)
462 P.2d 625

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fred Arthur SEDILLO and Epifanio Sedillo, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 8956.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Dec. 19, 1969.

Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 347, 81 N.M. 47, 462 P.2d 632, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
§ 1203.12 Granting or denying the request for regulation review. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 72966 , Sept. 9, 2024.
( a ) The Board, in its sole discretion, may grant or deny an interested person's request for regulation review. It will grant a request for regulation review that the Special Counsel submits. It will not, however, review a regulation before its effective date.
( b ) After considering the request for regulation review, the Board will issue an order granting or denying the request in whole or in part. Orders in which the Board grants the request, in whole or in part, will identify the agency or agencies involved, if any. They also will include the following: ( 1 ) A citation identifying the regulation being challenged;
( 2 ) A description of the issues to be addressed;
( 3 ) The docket number assigned to the proceedings; and
( 4 ) Instructions covering the review proceedings, including information regarding the time limits for filing submissions related to the request.
[54 FR 23632, June 2, 1989, as amended at 56 FR 41749, Aug. 23, 1991]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1





            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-70203, 333-73053 and 333-45276) and in the
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-82126) of King Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2005 relating to the financial statements,
management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
which appears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated March 15, 2005 relating to the financial statement
schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina

March 15, 2005
#### In the Matter of the Application of Clarence S. Nettles for Admission to the Bar.

Application granted. Present — Burr, Thomas, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ.