alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-04-028 April 9, 2004

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO MEET WITH DUKE ENERGY OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS SAFETY

PERFORMANCE AT McGUIRE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Duke Energy officials on

Thursday, April 15, to discuss the results of NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at the

McGuire nuclear power plant near Huntersville, North Carolina.

The meeting will be held at 1:00 p.m in the Office Complex Building at the McGuire Nuclear

Station, located at 12700 Hagers Ferry Road near Huntersville. The public is invited to observe the

meeting, and NRC officials will be available before the conclusion of the meeting to answer any

questions.

The NRC said both McGuire reactors were operated safely and met all objectives during the

evaluation period which covered the calendar year 2003. As a result, the NRC plans to conduct only

routine inspections at the McGuire plant in 2004. A letter from the NRC to Duke Energy outlining the

results of the most recent evaluation is available from Region II Public Affairs and on the NRC web

site at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/mcg_2003q4.pdf . 

 The NRC staff will also conduct inspections this year at McGuire (not specifically related to

the plant’s performance) related to operator licensing examinations, routine inspections of the plant’s

spent nuclear fuel storage installation, and safety issues concerning reactor pressure vessel lower head

penetration nozzles and the reactor containment sump. 

The agency will also continue to monitor plant actions in response to NRC security orders and

any newly developed portions of the plant security program.

 Current performance indicators for the two units at the McGuire plant are available at 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/MCG1/mcg1_chart.html and 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/MCG2/mcg2_chart.html .

###
### §356. Furnishing description of lands and title documents; recordation of documents; authenticated copies

Upon request by the Secretary, the heads of all executive departments, independent establishments, or instrumentalities having jurisdiction over any of the lands referred to in section 351 of this title shall furnish to the Secretary the legal description of all of such lands, and all pertinent abstracts, title papers, and other documents in the possession of such agencies concerning the status of the title of the United States to the mineral deposits that may be found in such lands.

Abstracts, title papers, and other documents furnished to the Secretary under this section shall be recorded promptly in the Bureau of Land Management in such form as the Secretary shall deem adequate for their preservation and use in the administration of this chapter, whereupon the originals shall be returned promptly to the agency from which they were received. Duly authenticated copies of any such abstracts, title papers, or other documents may, however, be furnished to the Secretary, in lieu of the originals, in the discretion of the agency concerned.

(Aug. 7, 1947, ch. 513, §7, 61 Stat. 915.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

See note set out under section 1 of this title.
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Eyeris Rodriguez and others, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

Supersonic of Florida, Inc. and 

others, Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 20-23459-Civ-Scola

Order Adopting the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendations

This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Edwin G. 

Torres for a report and recommendation on the Plaintiffs’ Omnibus Motion for 

Entry of Judgment in Proceedings Supplementary against Third-Party 

Defendants in Execution. (ECF No. 60.) On November 14, 2022, Judge Torres

issued a report, recommending that the Court grant in part and deny in part 

the motion. (Report & Recommendations, ECF No. 70.) No objections have been 

filed and the time to object has passed. Having considered Judge Torres’s

report, the record, and the relevant legal authorities, this Court finds Judge 

Torres’s report and recommendation cogent and compelling.

The Court affirms and adopts Judge Torres’s report and 

recommendation. (ECF No. 70.) The Court denies without prejudice the 

motion with respect to Berki Gonzalez, individually, and Ivan Montalvo, 

individually. The Court grants in part the Plaintiffs’ motion for writs of 

execution to be issued against Let’s Keep Trucking, LLC; Let’s Keep Trucking 4 

Us Corp.; and 4 Us & Company LLC (ECF No. 60) for the full amount of the 

outstanding judgment of $437,242.41. 

Done and ordered in Miami, Florida, on December 5, 2022.

________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-23459-RNS Document 73 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2022 Page 1 of 1
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-15417

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:97-cr-00327-WCO-JMF-7

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

ASBY HILL, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________

(September 4, 2015)

Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 
2

Asby Hill appeals from the district court’s order revoking his supervised 

release and imposing a sentence for violating the conditions of his supervised 

release. Hill was originally convicted of conspiring to distribute cocaine and 

cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. He was sentenced to 160 months’ 

imprisonment followed by 5 years of supervised release under 21 U.S.C. 

§ 841(b)(1)(C), a Class C felony. His term of supervised release commenced on 

June 3, 2011. In November 2014, the district court revoked Hill’s supervised 

release and sentenced him to 6 months’ imprisonment followed by 4.5 years of 

supervised release. 

On appeal, Hill contends the district court did not have jurisdiction to revoke 

his supervised release and impose a sentence because, according to Hill, he had 

already served the three-year statutory maximum term of supervised release at the 

time of his revocation hearing. Compare 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C) (requiring a 

term of supervised release of “at least 3 years”), with 18 U.S.C. § 3583(b) (stating 

“[e]xcept as otherwise provided,” the term of supervised release for a Class C 

felony may be “not more than three years”). As Hill acknowledges, his argument 

is foreclosed by our binding precedent. In United States v. Sanchez, 269 F.3d 1250 

(11th Cir. 2001) (en banc), abrogated in part on other grounds by United States v. 

Duncan, 400 F.3d 1297, 1308 (11th Cir. 2005), this Court held that 21 U.S.C. 

§ 841(b)(1)(C)’s three-year minimum term of supervised release is not capped by 
3

18 U.S.C. § 3583(b)(2)’s three-year maximum because it falls within § 3583(b)’s 

“[e]xcept as otherwise provided” language. See id. at 1287 (“Section 841(b)(1)(C), 

in fact, expressly ‘otherwise provide[s]’-specifically, § 841(b)(1)(C) provides that 

the term of supervised release for that particular Class C felony must be ‘at least 

three years.’” (quoting 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C)). Accordingly, we AFFIRM.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7603

STEPHEN T. JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LIEUTENANT ELLINGTON; J. B. BROWN, Sergeant;

RANDY RAY, Captain; CATHY COWANS, Sergeant;

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MAVERICK; JIM JONES,

Correctional Officer; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER

JUWAN; PAT ORSBAN, Nurse; DEFENDANT CLARANCE;

SERGEANT RAY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-95-192-1-MU)

Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 12, 1999

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen T. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Thompson Boone, BUNCOMBE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Asheville, North Carolina;

Elizabeth Ellen McConnell, ROBERTS & STEVENS, P.A., Asheville,

North Carolina, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Stephen T. Jones appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to (1) reinstate certain of his dismissed claims and

(2) strike one of the Defendants’ notice of his intent to file a

motion for summary judgment. We dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral

order.

We therefore grant the Appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal

as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.2

I,
John Carrozza, Chief Financial Officer of PSB Bancorp, Inc., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of PSB Bancorp, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



6.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date:
April 5, 2003

| |  | /s/JOHN CARROZZAJohn Carrozza
Acting Chief Financial Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-09-00703- CV
Hays Consoli dated Ind ependent School District, Appellant
v. Kim berly Drake, A ppellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F H AY S CO UNTY, 207 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 09- 0603 , H ONO RAB LE CHARLES R. RAMSAY , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an interlocutory appea l from a district court order d en y i n g a plea to the jurisdiction. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a) (8) (West 2008). The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appea l, advising that they have compromised their differ ence s in the underly ing cause . The parties further reque st that we rende r judgme nt e ffe ctuating the parties’ settlement ag ree ment, specific ally that we “re nder a take- nothing judgme nt and dismiss this appea l.” Given the limit ed scope of our subject-matter jurisdiction in this i n t er l o cutory appea l, we g rant the joint motion only to the extent of rende ring judgme nt dismiss ing this appea l. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)( 2)(A)
.

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pury ear and Pember

ton Dismissed on J oint Moti on Filed: De cembe r 10, 2010
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-73 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, May 15, 1998)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Committee on

Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a meeting June 11-12 in Rockville,

Maryland.

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will begin each day at

8:30 a.m. in Room T-2B3, of the NRC's Two White Flint North Building at 11545

Rockville Pike. The Subcommittee on Thermal-Hydraulic Phenomena will continue its

review of the results of the Westinghouse Test and Analysis Program being conducted

in support of the AP600 design certification, including the AP600 passive containment

system.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for public comment, will

be described in a Notice of Meeting published in a forthcoming edition of the Federal

Register.

#
#### § 2472.5 Where to file.

Requests to the Panel provided for in this part must either be filed electronically through use of the FLRA's eFiling system on the FLRA's website at *www.flra.gov,* or be addressed to the Executive Director, Federal Service Impasses Panel, Suite 300, 1400 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20424-0001. All inquiries or correspondence on the status of impasses or other related matters must be submitted by regular mail to the street address above, by using the telephone number (771) 444-5762, or by using the facsimile number (202) 482-6674.

[89 FR 20844, Mar. 26, 2024]
§ 213.101 Definitions. In this chapter: ( a ) Excepted service has the meaning given that term by section 2103 of title 5, United States Code, and includes all positions in the executive branch of the Federal Government which are specifically excepted from the competitive service by or pursuant to statute, by the President, or by the Office of Personnel Management, and which are not in the Senior Executive Service.
( b ) *Excepted position* means a position in the excepted service.
(5 U.S.C. 2103)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                       MPW INDUSTRIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                              --------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              JURISDICTION OF
         NAME                                                                  ORGANIZATION
         ----                                                                 ---------------
<S>                                                                            <C>
Aquatech Environmental, Inc.                                                      Michigan

ESI International, Inc.                                                             Ohio

         ESI-North Limited                                                          Ohio

MPW Industrial Cleaning Corp.                                                       Ohio

         MPW Industrial Services of Indiana, LLC                                  Indiana

MPW Industrial Services, Inc.                                                       Ohio

         MPW Management Services Corp.                                              Ohio

                  MPW Container Management Corp.                                    Ohio

                  MPW Container Management Corp. of Michigan                      Michigan

                  MPW Filtration Management Services Corp.                          Ohio

                           Gauthier Enterprises, Inc.                             Michigan

                  MPW Industrial Services, Ltd.                                    Canada

                  MPW Industrial, L.L.C. of V.C.                                   Mexico

                  MPW Industrial Water Services,  Inc.                              Ohio

                  Pentagon Technologies Group, Inc.                                 Ohio
</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1435

To amend the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled Substances 

Import and Export Act to eliminate certain mandatory minimum penalties relating to crack cocaine offenses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 25, 2003

Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled 

Substances Import and Export Act to eliminate certain 

mandatory minimum penalties relating to crack cocaine 

offenses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Crack-Cocaine Equi5 table Sentencing Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 1435 IH 

1 SEC. 2. TRAFFICKING AMENDMENTS. 

2 (a) 50 GRAM PENALTY.—Section 401(b)(1)(A) of the 

3 Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(A)) is 

4 amended by striking clause (iii). 

5 (b) 5 GRAM PENALTY.—Section 401(b)(1)(B) of the 

6 Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(B)) is 

7 amended by striking clause (iii). 

8 SEC. 3. POSSESSION AMENDMENT. 

9 Section 404(a) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

10 U.S.C. 844(a)) is amended by striking the sentence that 

11 begins ‘‘Notwithstanding the preceding sentence’’. 

12 SEC. 4. IMPORTATION AMENDMENTS. 

13 (a) 50 GRAM PENALTY.—Section 1010(b)(1) of the 

14 Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 

15 960(b)(1)) is amended by striking out subparagraph (C). 

16 (b) 5 GRAM PENALTY.—Section 1010(b)(2) of the 

17 Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 

18 960(b)(2)) is amended by striking out subparagraph (C). 

19 SEC. 5. SENTENCING COMMISSION TO AMEND GUIDELINES. 

20 Not later than 30 days after the date of the enact21 ment of this Act, the United States Sentencing Commis22 sion shall promulgate such amendments to the Sentencing 

23 Guidelines as are necessary to conform those Guidelines 

24 to the amendments made by this Act.

Æ
<TABLE>
<S><C>


<PAGE>
                         AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                TO
                       CONSULTING AGREEMENT

     This AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), dated as of
December 23, 1999, by and between AMERICAN KIOSK CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), and JOHN SCHMIDT ("Schmidt").

                       W I T N E S S E T H

     WHEREAS, the Company and the Schmidt are parties to a Consulting Areement, dated as of
December 8, 1999 (the "Consulting Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS, the Company and Zero's Mr. Submarine, Inc., a Virginia corporation ("Zeros"),
are parties to a certain asset purchase agreement, dated as of December 8, 1999 (the "Purchase
Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS, the effectiveness of the Purchase Agreement is contingent upon the approval of
the stockholders of Zeros; and

     WHEREAS, the Company and Schmidt have agreed to amend the Consulting Agreement to
provide that the Term, as defined therein, shall commence upon the approval of the Zeros stockholders
of the Purchase Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable considerations, the receipt and adequacy of
which are hereby acknowledged by each of the parties hereto, the parties hereby agree as follows:

     1.   Section 2 of the Consulting Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety as follows:

          "The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date the stockholders of Zero's
Mr. Submarine, Inc., a Virginia corporation ("Zeros"), approve the terms and conditions of that
certain Asset  Purchase Agreement, by and among the Company, Schmidt, Martin Palacios, Eugene T.
Schmidt and X.S., Inc., and shall continue for a period of five (5) years thereafter (the "Term")."

     2.   Subject to the modification set forth herein, the Consulting Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement as of the date first
set forth above.

                                   AMERICAN KIOSK CORP.



                                   By:

                                        Larry E. Graybill, Chief Financial Officer


                                   _______________________________________
                                   John Schmidt
</TABLE>
### §233a. Permits or leases of certain lands in Oklahoma; retention of royalties

The Secretary of the Interior is directed to retain in his custody until otherwise directed by law the 121⁄2 per centum and other royalties heretofore or hereafter received by him in pursuance of section 233 1 of this title.

(Mar. 4, 1925, ch. 550, §2, 43 Stat. 1302.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 233 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by act June 22, 1948, ch. 605, §3, 62 Stat. 576.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which comprises this chapter.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §72a–1e. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 72a–1e was editorially reclassified as section 4332 of this title.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1569

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located on 

Kinderkamack Road in Emerson, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Gary Albero 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2003

Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located on Kinderkamack Road in Emerson, New Jersey, 

as the ‘‘Gary Albero Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GARY ALBERO POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located on Kinderkamack Road in Emer6 son, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Gary Albero Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
2

•HR 1569 IH 

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the Gary Albero Post Office 

3 Building.

Æ