alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2103. National artificial reef plan

Not later than one year after November 8, 1984, the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Defense, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating, the Regional Fishery Managment 1 Councils, interested States, Interstate Fishery Commissions, and representatives of the private sector, shall develop and publish a long-term plan which will meet the purpose of this chapter and be consistent with the standards established under section 2102 of this title. The plan must include—

(1) geographic, hydrographic, geologic, biological, ecological, social, economic, and other criteria for siting artificial reefs;

(2) design, material, and other criteria for constructing artificial reefs;

(3) mechanisms and methodologies for monitoring the compliance of artificial reefs with the requirements of permits issued under section 2104 of this title;

(4) mechanisms and methodologies for managing the use of artificial reefs;

(5) a synopsis of existing information on artificial reefs and needs for further research on artificial reef technology and management strategies; and

(6) an evaluation of alternatives for facilitating the transfer of artificial reef construction materials to persons holding permits issued pursuant to section 2104 of this title, including, but not limited to, credits for environmental mitigation and modified tax obligations.

(Pub. L. 98–623, title II, §204, Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3395.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.

1 So in original. Probably should be "Management".
#### Max Kutner, Appellant, v. Irving Weiner, Defendant, and Julius Nelson Corporation, Defendant-Respondent.

Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER III—CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 0735

_____________________________
E RNIE M ORRIS E NTERPRISES , I NC

. , Appellant,

v.

C ONTRAX F URNISHINGS , LLC, M ETEOR E DUCATION , LLC, a nd G REG S. C AVE , a n i ndividual
, Appellee s

.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Monica J. Brasington , Judge

. June 21, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

.
L EWIS , O STERHAUS , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

J. Robert Mc C ormack of Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, S moak & Stewart, P.C., Tampa
, for Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee s

.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
 AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
 ACTION: Notice of issuance of permits for endangered species and/or marine mammals.
 SUMMARY: The following permits were issued.
 ADDRESSES: Documents and other information submitted with these applications are available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written request for a copy of such documents to: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Management Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 700, Arlington, Virginia 22203; fax 703/358-2281.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Division of Management Authority, telephone 703/358-2104.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on the dates below, as authorized by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531, 
                    *et seq.*), and/or the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 
                    *et seq.*), the Fish and Wildlife Service issued the requested permit(s) subject to certain conditions set forth therein. For each permit for an endangered species, the Service found that (1) the application was filed in good faith, (2) the granted permit would not operate to the disadvantage of the endangered species, and (3) the granted permit would be consistent with the purposes and policy set forth in section 2 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. Endangered Species Permit No.
Applicant
Receipt of application 
                            **Federal Register**
                             notice
Permit issuance date077487
Steve Martin's Working Wildlife
68 FR 65466, November 20, 2003
January 6, 2004.077489
Steve Martin's Working Wildlife
68 FR 65466, November 20, 2003
January 6, 2004.
 Endangered Marine Mammals and Marine Mammals Permit No.
Applicant
Receipt of application 
                            **Federal Register**
                             notice
Permit issuance date079001
Ralph F. Duceour
68 FR 65466, November 20, 2003
January 16, 2004.079622
Christopher M. Bieniek
68 FR 66851, November 28, 2003
January 21, 2004.
 Dated: January 23, 2004. Monica Farris, Senior Permit Biologist, Branch of Permits, Division of Management Authority.


[FR Doc. 04-2430 Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-025 February 23, 2004

NRC MODIFIES ORDER REQUIRING INSPECTION OF

PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR VESSEL HEADS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is revising the Order for inspection requirements for

reactor pressure vessel heads at pressurized water reactors. The change is part of the Commission’s

ongoing efforts to provide a clear regulatory framework to ensure public health and safety. The revised

Order primarily addresses requirements for bare-metal visual inspections and non-visual examination

of reactor pressure vessel heads.

The discovery of degradation in the vessel head at the Davis-Besse reactor in Oak Harbor,

Ohio, and discovery of leaks and cracking at other plants, reinforced the need for more effective reactor

vessel head inspections, leading the NRC to issue an Order in February 2003. The original Order

required visual inspection of the entire bare-metal surface of a vessel head.

Based on information provided in numerous requests for deviation from portions of the

inspection regime, the NRC concluded that a revised Order, which requires at least a 95 percent baremetal inspection for those vessel heads with portions obscured by certain support structures, was

warranted. If any boron deposits or corrosive residue are identified in the vicinity of the support

structure, the licensee must examine the vessel head under the obstruction to ensure the head is not

degraded.

In addition, the revised Order adds a “Replaced” category of vessel head degradation

susceptibility to the existing High, Moderate and Low ratings. The categories determine the required

frequency of vessel head inspections for plants during refueling outages, which typically occur about

every 18 to 24 months.

Plants in the High category must perform inspections during every refueling outage. Those in

the Moderate category must perform inspections during at least every other refueling outage. Plants in

the Low category must perform bare-metal inspections at least every third outage or every five years,

whichever occurs first. Penetration nozzle non-visual inspections must be performed every fourth

outage or every seven years, whichever occurs first.
Plants in the Replaced category need not perform inspections during the outage when the head

is replaced. However, these plants must thereafter perform the same inspections as the Low category.

The revised Order continues to provide reasonable assurance of vessel head integrity and

protection of public health and safety.

The revised Order retains the requirement for licensees to submit a report to the NRC detailing

the inspection findings within 60 days of restarting the plant. A copy of the revised Order (EA-03-009,

Rev. 01) will be available through the NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management

System (ADAMS) on the agency’s web site, by entering accession number ML040220391 at this

address: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html .

###
### **CHAPTER 48—OCEAN AND COASTAL MAPPING INTEGRATION**

Sec.
3501.
Establishment of program.
3502.
Interagency Working Group on Ocean and Coastal Mapping.
3503.
Biennial reports.
3504.
NOAA joint ocean and coastal mapping centers.
3504a.
Ocean and coastal mapping Federal funding opportunity.
3504b.
Agreements and financial assistance.
3505.
Effect on other laws.
3506.
Authorization of appropriations.
3507.
Definitions.
§ 162.52 Disposition of proceeds of sale of property seized and forfeited under 19 U.S.C. 1592. ( a ) *Order of disposition of proceeds.* Section 613 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1613), provides for the disposition of the proceeds from the sale of property seized and forfeited under section 592, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1592), as provided for in § 162.75 of this part. Distribution shall be made in the following order: ( 1 ) Internal revenue taxes.
( 2 ) Marshal's fees and court costs.
( 3 ) Expenses of advertising and sale.
( 4 ) Expenses of cartage, storage, and labor. When proceeds are insufficient to pay these expenses fully, they shall be paid pro rata.
( 5 ) Duties.
( 6 ) Any sum due to satisfy a lien for freight, charges, or contributions in general average, provided notice of the lien has been given in the manner prescribed by law.
( 7 ) The monetary penalty assessed under 19 U.S.C. 1592.
( 8 ) The remaining proceeds, if any, shall be paid to the appropriate party-in-interest as provided in paragraph (b).
( b ) *Determination of appropriate party-in-interest.* ( 1 ) If the property is subject to a judicial forfeiture proceeding and if it appears at the time of this proceeding that 2 or more parties claim an interest in the remaining proceeds referred to in paragraph (a)(8), each of the parties shall be joined in the proceeding so that the issue of proper distribution may be determined by the court.
( 2 ) If the property is sold under the summary forfeiture procedure, or if the court has not specified the manner of distribution, the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer shall hold the excess proceeds for 3 months from the date of the sale to allow any party-in-interest to claim the proceeds.
( 3 ) If there is one alleged violator and no petition has been filed for the excess proceeds by another person, the excess proceeds shall be disbursed to the person against whom the penalty was assessed.
( 4 ) If there are 2 or more persons with claims or possible claims to the excess proceeds, the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer shall attempt to obtain a written agreement from the parties as to the distribution. If an agreement cannot be reached, the matter shall be referred to Customs Headquarters for determination.
( c ) *Official use of seized and forfeited property.* If the seized and forfeited property has been authorized for official use, its retention or delivery shall be regarded as a “sale” for the purposes of section 613, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1613). The appropriation available to the receiving agency for the purchase, hire, operation, maintenance, and repair of the type of property involved shall be distributed as provided in paragraphs (a) and (b).
[T.D. 79-160, 44 FR 31958, June 4, 1979, as amended by T.D. 99-27, 64 FR 13676, Mar. 22, 1999]
Bridge Loan Agreement - August 1, 2003


EXHIBIT 10.4

Nation Energy Inc.

  1736 E. Charleston Boulevard

  Suite 725

  Las Vegas, NV 89104

  U.S.A.

 August 1, 2003

TO:  John Hislop

  1589 Marpole Avenue

  Vancouver, BC V6J 2R9

 Dear John:

 Re:	Bridge Loan

 This letter will serve to confirm our agreement wherein, for good and valuable
  consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
  you have agreed to loan $500,000 (the “Loan”) to Nation Energy
  Inc. (the “Company”) on the following terms and conditions:

 1.
  The principal amount of the Loan, together with accrued interest, shall be
  due and payable on demand.

 2.
  The Loan shall bear interest at 15% per annum and shall be payable quarterly
  in arrears.

 3.
  The obligations of the Company will be evidenced by a promissory note in the
  form attached hereto.

 Accepting that the above accurately details your understanding of our agreement
  in this regard could you please execute this letter where indicated and return
  same at your early convenience. 

 Yours truly,

 Nation Energy Inc.

 Per: “Donald A Sharpe”

Authorized Signatory

 Acknowledged and agreed to this 1st day of August, 2003 by:

/s/ “John R Hislop”

  _____________________

  John Hislop




 PROMISSORY NOTE 

	CDN$500,000.00	August 1, 2003


Nation Energy Inc.

  1736 E. Charleston Boulevard

  Suite 725

  Las Vegas, NV 89104

  U.S.A.

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned
  promises to pay on DEMAND to the order of John Hislop (the “Lender”),
  of 1589 Marpole Avenue, Vancouver, BC V6J 2R9, the principal sum of FIVE HUNDRED
  THOUSAND ($500,000) DOLLARS in lawful currency of Canada, together with interest
  thereon at a rate of 15% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears calculated
  from the date hereof.

Until demand is made hereunder,
  the accrued interest will be repaid in quarterly instalments in the amount
  of Eighteen Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty ($18,750.00) Dollars per instalment
  effective the 15th day of November, 2003 and in each and every quarter thereafter,
  until the whole of the said principal sum and accrued interest is paid.

 This Promissory Note is being
  issued in accordance with and is subject to the terms of a letter agreement
  entered into between the undersigned and the Lender dated as of August 1st,
  2003.

 The undersigned, when not in default hereunder,
  will have the privilege of prepaying in whole or in part the said principal
  sum without notice or bonus.

 Presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice
  of dishonour are hereby waived.

	 	
      Nation Energy Inc.

      “ Donald A Sharpe”

        __________________________________________

        Signature

      “ Donald A Sharpe, President”

        __________________________________________

        Name of Signatory and Title
```

[106th Congress Public Law 441]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ441.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 1925]]

Public Law 106-441
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 110 Postal Way in Carrollton, Georgia, as the ``Samuel P. Roberts Post 
        Office Building''. <<NOTE: Nov. 6, 2000 -  [H.R. 4786]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 110 
Postal Way in Carrollton, Georgia, shall be known and designated as the 
``Samuel P. Roberts Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Samuel P. Roberts Post Office 
Building''.

    Approved November 6, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4786:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Sept. 19, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 24, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of eMagin Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Campbell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







March 16, 2011
By:
/s/ Paul CampbellPaul CampbellChief Financial Officer
CONSENT OF BDO SEIDMAN, LLP


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
of Tag-It Pacific, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-50267) of our report dated
March 8, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated balance sheets of Tag-It
Pacific, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders' equity (deficiency) and cash flows for the
years then ended and the four months ended December 31, 1997, which report is
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.



                                            /S/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP


Los Angeles, California
March 29, 1999
FORM OF 302 CERTIFICATION

			             EXHIBIT 31

			           CERTIFICATIONS


I, Helen M. Dickens, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fund America Investors
Corporation II;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified any material weaknesses
in internal controls; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report
whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: August 12, 2005				/s/ Helen M. Dickens
      ---------------				--------------------
							Helen M. Dickens
							President
							(Chief Financial Officer)
(May 17, 1949.)

#### Irene Lovett, v. James A. Trowbridge, Jr., as Trustee under the Will of James A. Trowbridge, Deceased, et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-074 April 28, 2005

NRC ISSUES CONFIRMATORY ORDER TO VIRGINIA FIRM

IN WHISTLEBLOWER CASE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued an order to Soil Consultants, Inc., (SCI) of

Manassas, Va., confirming a settlement agreement between the agency and the company resolving

employee-protection complaints against SCI.

In the settlement, SCI agreed to pay a fine of $1,200 and to take additional corrective actions to

promote a safety-conscious work environment. Those actions include hiring a contractor to develop a

training course on employee protection for company managers and supervisors and implementing that

training within six months.

The settlement was reached through the NRC’s new alternative dispute resolution program,

using a professional neutral mediator arranged through Cornell University’s Institute on Conflict

Resolution.

NRC’s enforcement action stemmed from SCI’s termination in August 2003 of a dispatcher it

believed had reported safety concerns to the NRC. The NRC staff proposed an escalated fine of $9,600

because the violation was identified by the NRC rather than self-reported by the licensee, and because

the company’s corrective action was focused too narrowly and did not address management’s

understanding of NRC regulations on employee protection.

“This settlement shows the value of alternative dispute resolution in the NRC’s enforcement

process,” said Frank J. Congel, director of the NRC’s Office of Enforcement. “Soil Consultants, Inc.,

has committed to promote a safety-conscious work environment and educate its management about the

employee-protection requirements in NRC regulations. While NRC will not pursue further

enforcement action in this matter, we will evaluate SCI’s implementation of the agreement in future

inspections.”

For more information about the agency’s enforcement program, including details about

significant enforcement actions, see the agency’s Web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/regulatory/enforcement.html .

###