alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 89 FR 20832, Mar. 25, 2024.

§ 351.602 Determination upon request. ( a ) *Request for determination.* ( 1 ) Any person, including the Secretary of Agriculture, who has reason to believe there have been changes in or additions to the latest annual list published under § 351.601 may request in writing that the Secretary determine under section 702(a)(3) of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 whether there are any changes or additions. The person must file the request with the Central Records Unit (*see* § 351.103). The request must allege either a change in the type or amount of any subsidy included in the latest annual list or quarterly update or an additional subsidy not included in that list or update provided by a foreign government, and must contain the following, to the extent reasonably available to the requesting person: ( i ) The name and address of the person;
( ii ) The article of cheese subject to an in-quota rate of duty allegedly benefitting from the changed or additional subsidy;
( iii ) The country of origin of the article of cheese subject to an in-quota rate of duty; and
( iv ) The alleged subsidy or changed subsidy and relevant factual information (particularly documentary evidence) regarding the alleged changed or additional subsidy including the authority under which it is provided, the manner in which it is paid, and the value of the subsidy to producers or exporters of the article.
( 2 ) The requirements of § 351.303 (c) and (d) apply to this section.
( b ) *Determination.* Not later than 30 days after receiving an acceptable request, the Secretary will: ( 1 ) In consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture, determine based on the available information whether there has been any change in the type or amount of any subsidy included in the latest annual list or quarterly update or an additional subsidy not included in that list or update is being provided by a foreign government;
( 2 ) Notify the Secretary of Agriculture and the person making the request of the determination; and
( 3 ) Promptly publish in the Federal Register notice of any changes or additions.
### §5333. Safe harbor with respect to keep open directives

(a) In General.—With respect to a customer account or customer transaction of a financial institution, if a Federal law enforcement agency, after notifying FinCEN of the intent to submit a written request to the financial institution that the financial institution keep that account or transaction open (referred to in this section as a "keep open request"), or if a State, Tribal, or local law enforcement agency with the concurrence of FinCEN submits a keep open request—

(1) the financial institution shall not be liable under this subchapter for maintaining that account or transaction consistent with the parameters and timing of the request; and

(2) no Federal or State department or agency may take any adverse supervisory action under this subchapter with respect to the financial institution solely for maintaining that account or transaction consistent with the parameters of the request.

(b) Rule of Construction.—Nothing in this section may be construed—

(1) to prevent a Federal or State department or agency from verifying the validity of a keep open request submitted under subsection (a) with the law enforcement agency submitting that request;

(2) to relieve a financial institution from complying with any reporting requirements or any other provisions of this subchapter, including the reporting of suspicious transactions under section 5318(g); or

(3) to extend the safe harbor described in subsection (a) to any actions taken by the financial institution—

(A) before the date of the keep open request to maintain a customer account; or

(B) after the termination date stated in the keep open request.

(c) Letter Termination Date.—For the purposes of this section, any keep open request submitted under subsection (a) shall include a termination date after which that request shall no longer apply.

(d) Record Keeping.—Any Federal, State, Tribal, or local law enforcement agency that submits to a financial institution a keep open request shall, not later than 2 business days after the date on which the request is submitted to the financial institution—

(1) submit to FinCEN a copy of the request; and

(2) alert FinCEN as to whether the financial institution has implemented the request.

(e) Guidance.—The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and Federal, State, Tribal, and local law enforcement agencies, shall issue guidance on the required elements of a keep open request.

(Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. F, title LXIII, §6306(a)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4588.)
Exhibit 11
 AmSurg Corp.
Earnings Per Share
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
  PerEarnings
    
    Shares
    
    Share(Numerator)
    
    (Denominator)
    
    AmountFor the three months ended March 31, 2009:Net earnings from continuing operations attributable to AmSurg
Corp. per common share (basic)
    
    $
    12,603
    
    
    
    31,244
    
    
    $
    0.40Effect of dilutive securities options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    162Net earnings from continuing operations attributable to
AmSurg Corp. per common share (diluted)
    
    $
    12,603
    
    
    
    31,406
    
    
    $
    0.40Net earnings attributable to AmSurg Corp. per common share (basic)
    
    $
    12,616
    
    
    
    31,244
    
    
    $
    0.40Effect of dilutive securities options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    162Net earnings attributable to AmSurg Corp. per common share
(diluted)
    
    $
    12,616
    
    
    
    31,406
    
    
    $
    0.40For the three months ended March 31, 2008:Net earnings from continuing operations attributable to AmSurg
Corp.
per common share (basic)
    
    $
    11,619
    
    
    
    31,298
    
    
    $
    0.37Effect of dilutive securities options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    492Net earnings from continuing operations attributable to
AmSurg Corp. per common share (diluted)
    
    $
    11,619
    
    
    
    31,790
    
    
    $
    0.37Net earnings attributable to AmSurg Corp. per common share (basic)
    
    $
    11,706
    
    
    
    31,298
    
    
    $
    0.37Effect of dilutive securities options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    492Net earnings attributable to AmSurg Corp. per common share
(diluted)
    
    $
    11,706
    
    
    
    31,790
    
    
    $
    0.37
§ 10400.11 Fees to be charged—general. IPEC will assess a fee to process FOIA requests in accordance with the provisions of this section and the “Uniform Freedom of Information Fee Schedule and Guidelines” issued by the Office of Management and Budget. IPEC shall ensure that searches, review, and duplication are conducted in the most efficient and the least expensive manner. IPEC will charge the following fees unless a waiver or reduction of fees is granted under § 10400.15, or the total fee to be charged is less than $25.00. IPEC will notify the requester if IPEC estimates that charges will exceed $25.00 including a breakdown of the fees for search, review, or duplication and whether applicable entitlements to duplication and search at no charge have been provided. IPEC will not process the request until the requester either commits in writing to pay the actual or estimated total fee, or designates some amount of fees that it is willing to pay. ( a ) *Search for records.* IPEC will charge $77.00 per hour, which is a blended hourly rate for all personnel that respond to FOIA requests plus 16 percent of that rate to cover benefits.
( b ) *Review of records.* IPEC will charge $77.00 per hour, which is a blended hourly rate for all personnel that responded to FOIA requests plus 16 percent of that rate to cover benefits. Records or portions of records withheld under an exemption subsequently determined not to apply may be reviewed to determine the applicability of exemptions not considered. The cost for a subsequent review is assessable.
( c ) *Duplication of records.* IPEC will charge duplication fees to all requesters. IPEC will honor a requester's preference for receiving a record in a particular format if IPEC can readily reproduce it in the form or format requested. If IPEC provides photocopies, IPEC will make one copy per request at the cost of $.10 per page. For copies of records produced on tapes, disks or other media, IPEC will charge the direct costs of producing the copy, including operator time. Where IPEC must scan paper documents in order to comply with a requester's preference to receive the records in an electronic format, IPEC will charge the direct costs associated with scanning those materials. For other forms of duplication, IPEC will charge the direct costs. IPEC will provide the first 100 pages of duplication (or the cost equivalent for other media) without charge except for requesters seeking records for a commercial use.
( d ) *Other charges.* IPEC will recover the costs of providing other services such as certifying records or sending records by special methods.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Louis North et al., Appellants. Michael J. Murphy, as Acting Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

All concur.
§ 1210.19 Bench decisions. ( a ) *General.* The administrative judge may issue a bench decision at the close of the hearing. A bench decision is effective when issued.
( b ) *Transcription of bench decision.* A transcribed copy of the decision will be prepared by the court reporter under the administrative judge's supervision to memorialize the oral decision. The official issuance of a bench decision is the date the administrative judge announces the decision and not the date the administrative judge signs the transcription.
### Part 2—Financial Crime-Free Communities Support Program
### §6905. Redwood National Park and the Lake Tahoe Basin

(a) The Secretary of the Interior shall make a payment for each fiscal year to each unit of general local government in which an interest in land owned by the United States Government in the Redwood National Park is located. A unit may use the payment for any governmental purpose. The payment shall be made as provided in section 6903 of this title and shall include an amount payable under section 6903.

(b)(1) In addition to payments the Secretary makes under subsection (a) of this section, the Secretary shall make a payment for each fiscal year to each unit of general local government in which is located an interest in land—

(A) owned by the Government in the Redwood National Park; or

(B) acquired in the Lake Tahoe Basin under the Act of December 23, 1980 (Public Law 96–586, 94 Stat. 3383).

(2) The payment shall be made as provided in section 6904 of this title and shall include an amount payable under section 6904. However, an amount computed but not paid because of the first sentence of subsection (b) and the 2d sentence of subsection (c) of section 6904 shall be carried forward and applied to future years in which the payment would not otherwise equal the amount of real property taxes assessed and levied on the land during the last fiscal year before the fiscal year in which the interest was acquired until the amount is applied completely.

(3) The unit of general local government may use the payment for any governmental purpose.

(4) The Redwoods Community College District is a school district under section 6904(b) of this title.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1034.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6905(a) | 16:79o(a), (b). | Mar. 27, 1978, Pub. L. 95–250, §106, 92 Stat. 171. |
| 6905(b)(1)– (3) | (uncodified). | Dec. 23, 1980, Pub. L. 96–586, §2(i), 94 Stat. 3383. |
| | 16:79o(c). | |
| 6905(b)(4) | 16:79o(d). | |

In subsection (a), the words "Notwithstanding any contrary provision of sections 1601 to 1607 of title 31" are omitted as unnecessary because of the restatement. The word "general" is added for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The words "an interest in" are added for consistency because of the source provisions restated in the revised section. The word "Government" is added for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the Code. The text of 16:79o(a)(last sentence) is omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (b)(1)–(3), the source provisions are combined for clarity and because of the restatement.

In subsection (b)(2), the words "portion of the total", "full", and "land or" are omitted as surplus. The words "for addition to Redwood National Park" are omitted as unnecessary because of the restatement.

In subsection (b)(4), the word "affected" is omitted as surplus.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The provisions of Act of December 23, 1980 (Public Law 96–586, 94 Stat. 3383) which relate to the acquisition of the Lake Tahoe Basin, referred to in subsec. (b)(1)(B), are not classified to the Code.
1 ... T h i s pr oce edi n g ar i s es ou t of Cau s e N o. 08- 01- 23163- M CV AJA, s t y l ed Soi l a G onz al ez M ar t i nez v . Nacho Ji m enez , pe nd i ng i n t he 3 6 5 t h Jud i ci al D i st ri ct , M averi ck C o unt y , T exas, t he H o no rable Am ad o J. A b ascal , II I presi d i ng. i i i i i i



## MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No. 04-09-00111- CV IN RE NA CH O JI M EN EZ Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 

### PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Rebec ca Simmons, J ustice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: Fe bruar y 25, 2009 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DEN I ED On Fe bruar

y 19, 2009, rela tor filed a pe tition for writ of mandamus a n d a m o t i o n for

emer g ency

temporar y relief . The c ourt has considered relator’ s petition for writ of manda mus and is of the opinion that relator is not entit led t o the relief s oug ht. Acc ording ly , the petit ion for wr it of mandamus and the motion for emer g ency temporar y relief are DENI ED. See T EX 

### . R. A PP 

### . P. 52.8(a).

PER CU RI AM
#### Lewis H. Combs, Respondent, v. Peter Colella, Appellant.

Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ. [See *post,*p. 1019.]
### [§5327. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title II, §2223(1), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–415]

Section, added Pub. L. 102–550, title XV, §1511(a), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4056, required Secretary to prescribe regulations requiring depository institutions to identify and report on financial institution customers.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin E. Franklin,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Martin E. Franklin
----------------------
Martin E. Franklin
Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2005

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ian G.H. Ashken, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Ian G.H. Ashken
-------------------
Ian G.H. Ashken
Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2005
```
### §323. Investment of operating cash

(a) To manage United States cash, the Secretary of the Treasury may invest any part of the operating cash of the Treasury for not more than 90 days. The Secretary may invest the operating cash of the Treasury in—

(1) obligations of depositories maintaining Treasury tax and loan accounts secured by pledged collateral acceptable to the Secretary;

(2) obligations of the United States Government; and

(3) repurchase agreements with parties acceptable to the Secretary.

(b) Subsection (a) of this section does not require the Secretary to invest a cash balance held in a particular account.

(c) The Secretary shall consider the prevailing market in prescribing rates of interest for investments under subsection (a)(1) of this section.

(d)(1) The Secretary of the Treasury shall submit each fiscal year to the appropriate committees a report detailing the investment of operating cash under subsection (a) for the preceding fiscal year. The report shall describe the Secretary's consideration of risks associated with investments and the actions taken to manage such risks.

(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), the term "appropriate committees" means the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 882; Pub. L. 110–351, title V, §502, Oct. 7, 2008, 122 Stat. 3980.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 323(a) | 31:1038(1st sentence less 1st, 2d provisos). | Oct. 28, 1977, Pub. L. 95–147, §1, 91 Stat. 1227. |
| 323(b) | 31:1038(1st, 2d provisos). | |
| 323(c) | 31:1038(last sentence). | |

In subsection (a), before clause (1), the words "To manage United States cash" are substituted for "for cash management purposes" for clarity. In clause (1), the words "as security for tax and loan accounts" are omitted as unnecessary. In clause (2), the words "agencies of the United States" are omitted as being included in "the Government".

In subsection (c), the words "Investments in obligations of depositaries maintaining such accounts" and "rates of interest" (the 2d time they appear) are omitted as unnecessary because of the restatement.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–351 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to investment of operating cash.
### §271. Prospecting permits; lands included; acreage

The Secretary of the Interior is hereby authorized and directed, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, to grant to any qualified applicant a prospecting permit which shall give the exclusive right to prospect for sulphur in lands belonging to the United States located in the States of Louisiana and New Mexico for a period of not exceeding two years: Provided, That the area to be included in such a permit shall be not exceeding six hundred and forty acres of land in reasonably compact form.

(Apr. 17, 1926, ch. 158, §1, 44 Stat. 301; July 16, 1932, ch. 498, 47 Stat. 701.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

1932—Act July 16, 1932, substituted "States of Louisiana and New Mexico" for "State of Louisiana".
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

The State of Texas

,

State

,

v.

Jeffrey Gendron

,

Appellee

. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 1 3

- 00 119

- CR

Appeal from the

County Criminal Court No. 2

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20130C00284 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appell ee’ s third motion for extension of time to file the brief

until March 2 0, 2014

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

THE APPELLEE’ S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Brock Benjamin

, the Appell ee’ s Attorney , prepare

the Appell ee’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before March 2 0 , 2014

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25 th day of February, 2014

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-03-006 February 10, 2003

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC PROPOSES $9,000 FINE AGAINST UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO FOR

VIOLATING NRC RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $9,000 civil penalty against the

University of Puerto Rico for violations of NRC safety requirements. 

 

NRC inspections conducted in February, March and June 2002, and an investigation by the

NRC’s Office of Investigations in August 2002 resulted in the university being cited for three separate

violations characterized as Severity Level 3, the agency’s third most serious. NRC officials said that

during late 2001 and early 2002, the university failed to survey all areas where radiopharmaceuticals

were administered at the end of the day as required by NRC regulations. The second violation was

issued because the NRC determined that the university failed to calibrate radiation detection

instruments as required. The third violation resulted from the failure of a nuclear medicine

technologist employed by the university to notify the university’s radiation safety officer when

unexpectedly high radiation levels were discovered. The university has taken a number of corrective

actions to address the violations and the NRC is satisfied with those actions.

Due to the willful nature of these violations and the fact that they were identified during an

NRC inspection and investigation, the NRC is issuing the base civil penalty of $3,000 for each of the

three violations, resulting in a cumulative fine of $9,000.

The university has 30 days from receipt of the NRC Notice of Violation to either pay the civil

penalty or to protest its imposition, in whole or in part.

Members of the public may obtain copies of the letter from the NRC to the university from the

Region II public affairs office by e-mail at OPA2@nrc.gov or calling 404-562-4416 or 4417. The

letter also will be available on the NRC Web Site at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the public

electronic reading room). If you need help with the electronic reading room, please contact the Public

Document Room at 1-800-397-4209 or e-mail pdr@nrc.gov

###
#### § 1312.32 Purpose and authority.

Other government agencies, and individual members of the public, frequently request that classified information in OMB files be reviewed for possible declassification and release. This subpart prescribes the procedures for such review and subsequent release or denial. It is issued under the authority of Executive Order 12958 (60 FR 19825, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 333), as implemented by Information Security Oversight Office Directive No. 1 (32 CFR part 2001).