alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Air Force Fact Sheet            BATTLEFIELD AIR TARGETING MICRO AIR                   VEHICLE UAS                  Mission The Air Force's                   Battlefield Air Targeting Micro Air Vehicle, or BATMAV, Small                   Unmanned Aircraft System provides real-time direct situational                   awareness and target information for Air Force Special                   Operations Command Battlefield Airmen. The BATMAV falls into                   the class of Air Force small unmanned aircraft systems known                   as micro UAS. Features The BATMAV                   UAS features the expendable BATMAV air vehicle, a ground                   control unit and communications ground station. BATMAV is a                   collapsible lightweight air vehicle with a two-bladed                   propeller driven by a small electric motor. The BATMAV is                   equipped with an internal Global Positioning System and                   Inertial Navigation System, autopilot and two on-board                   cameras. The entire system can function autonomously from                   takeoff to recovery, or be controlled by one operator using a                   handheld remote control unit. The entire system can fit into a                   backpack. Background The BATMAV                   originated from a combat need for combat controller Airmen to                   carry equipment needed for beyond-line-of-sight surveillance                   and to engage enemy forces. Aerovironment Inc. was awarded the                   contract in December 2006 after competing against a number of                   candidate systems. The Air Force took delivery of its initial                   BATMAV in 2007. General                   Characteristics Primary                   function: Situational awareness and direct target                   information Contractor: Aerovironment,                   Inc. Power plant: Electric motor,                   rechargeable lithium ion batteries Wingspan:                   16.5 inches (41.9 cm) Length:                   11.5 inches (29.2 cm) Weight (air                   vehicle): 1 pound (453 grams)                   Weight: (total system) 14.4 pounds (6.53                   kilograms) Maximum speed: 40+ mph (35+                   knots) Operating altitude: Surface to                   500+ feet above ground level (0-152+ meters)                   System Cost: approximately $49,000 (2006                   dollars) Payload: High resolution,                   day/night camera Inventory:                   ClassifiedPoint of                   Contact Air Force Special Operations Command, Public                   Affairs Office, 229 Cody Ave., Suite 103; Hurlburt Field, FL                   32544-5312; DSN 579-5515 or 850-884-5515; e-mail:                   afsoc.pa@hurlburt.af.milNovember 2007
# Four **th Court of Appeals**

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 17, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00679

- CV

IN RE SOUTHCROSS ENERGY PARTNERS, GP, LLC

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Marialyn Barnar d, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice

Citing section 9(c) of the court’s Internal Operating Procedures (“IOPs”), the real parties in interest have requested clarification of the composition of the panel assigned to this original proceeding. Pursuant to section 8(e) of our IOPs, a panel is assigned to an original proceeding upon receipt of a petition. In accordance with sect ion 8(e), the clerk of the court assigned the panel of Chief Justice Marion, Justice Barnard, and Justice Martinez to this original proceeding upon the filing of relator’s petition on October 16, 2017 . Although section 9(c) permits a panel assigned to an original proceeding to determine that the same panel should be assigned to

a nother related matter, section 9(c) only applies when the other matter is “pending” in the court.

Because o riginal proceeding no. 04

- 17

- 00626

- CV was dismissed on October 4, 2017, it was not “pending” in this court when relator filed its petition in this original proceeding. Accordingly, section 9(c) had no relevance in assigning the panel to this original proceeding.

It is so ORDERED on November 17, 2017

.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO : ___________________________ Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. DC

- 16

- 139 , styled Ivy Gonzalez on Behalf of M. R. Gonzalez, et al. v. Southcross Energy Partners, GP LLC , pending in the 229th Judicial District Court

, Duval County, Texas, the

Honorable Ana Lisa Garza presiding.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-038 March 27, 2003

 NRC’S ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE MEDICAL USES OF ISOTOPES TO HOLD

PUBLIC MEETING MAY 20-21

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will convene a meeting of the Advisory Committee on the

Medical Uses of Isotopes on May 20 and 21 at its headquarters in Rockville, Maryland.

All sessions of the meeting will be open to the public, except the first session, which will be

closed to conduct administrative business. Among the agenda items for the public sessions are: 

• Follow-up discussion of the ACMUI’s recommendations on the training and experience

requirements contained in NRC’s regulations on the medical uses of radioactive material;

• Written directives as they pertain to certain uses of brachytherapy, a treatment for early stages of

cancer; 

• The ACMUI’s Subcommittee activities to address the medical uses of emerging technologies;

• An update to the Government Accounting Office review of the domestic use of radioactive

material; 

• A pilot project on information exchange with Agreement States regarding the regulation of

radioactive materials; and 

• Physical presence requirements during stereotactic radiosurgery treatments.

The public sessions will be held on Tuesday, May 20, from 1 to 5 p.m., and Wednesday, May

21, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. The meeting will be held at NRC headquarters, 11545 Rockville Pike, in

Conference Room T-2B3.

Persons who wish to provide a written statement should submit a reproducible copy to Angela

R. Williamson, Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Mail Stop T-8F5, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Alternately, statements may be e-mailed

to Ms. Williamson at arw@nrc.gov . Submissions should be postmarked by May 13 and must pertain to

the topics on the meeting agenda.
Questions from the public will be permitted during the meeting, at the discretion of the

chairman. Transcripts of the meeting and written comments will be available about July 21 on the 

NRC’s web site, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acmui/tr/ , and in the NRC Public

Document Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, telephone (800) 397-4209. Minutes of the meeting will be

available about August 20.

For further information, contact Angela R. Williamson at (301) 415-5030.

###
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GATEWAY 2000,
INC.'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         799,608
<SECURITIES>                                    92,243
<RECEIVABLES>                                  541,793
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,453
<INVENTORY>                                    154,823
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,743,350
<PP&E>                                         607,398
<DEPRECIATION>                                 192,587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,276,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,076,621
<BONDS>                                          1,793
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,556
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,100,571
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,276,386
<SALES>                                      3,346,837
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,346,837
<CGS>                                        2,676,655
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,676,655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,923
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 460
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                213,455
<INCOME-TAX>                                    76,844
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            136,611
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   136,611
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.86
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In
connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Allan J. Kent, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for the periods presented.

















/s/ Allan
J. Kent


--------------------------


Allan J.
Kent


Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


May 11,
2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

July 12, 2024

SC-2024-0103

Ex parte Aleisha Danielle Parker PETITION FOR WRIT OF 

CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: 

Aleisha Danielle Parker v. State of Alabama) (Madison Circuit Court: 

CC-22-1572; Criminal Appeals: CR-2023-0381).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above 

referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the 

Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was 

entered in this cause on July 12, 2024:

Writ Denied. No Opinion. Bryan, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Shaw, 

Mendheim, and Mitchell, JJ., concur.

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified 

on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered 

by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are 

hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness 

my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7236 

LESLIE EDWARD GOODMAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-04-620)

Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: January 3, 2006

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leslie Edward Goodman, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Leslie Edward Goodman, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal

the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (2000) as untimely. The order is not appealable unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that

any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Goodman has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report of The Newark Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the year ended April 30, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert H. Mullen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented. 

Dated: July 26,2007 

 

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure statement. 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bio Medica Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2006 (the "Report"), I,
Stan Cipkowski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Stan Cipkowski
                                        ------------------
                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                        May 15, 2006


                                       19
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-03-033 August 1, 2003

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC APPROVES RESTART OF SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT

UNIT 1 REACTOR

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has determined that the South Texas Project

Nuclear Operating Co. has completed all necessary actions for the safe restart of South Texas

Project Unit 1 near Bay City, Texas, following repairs to pipes in the bottom of the reactor

vessel.

On April 12, while Unit 1 was shut down for a refueling outage, STP staff discovered

leaks in two of the 58 pipes where instruments penetrate the bottom of the reactor vessel.

NRC began a Special Inspection at Unit 1 on May 5 to review the circumstances of the

discovery, the licensee’s root cause analysis and the adequacy of the licensee’s repairs. The

repair involved removal of the lower portion of the damaged pipe, replacing it with a new pipe

that has improved resistance to corrosion, and welding it to the outside of the reactor vessel wall. 

NRC staff concluded that the repair was acceptable regardless of the cause of the leakage, which

is still under investigation.

 NRC held a public meeting on the Special Inspection team’s findings in Bay City on July

28. A report documenting the team’s findings will be completed by August 28, and made

publicly available. “We believe that South Texas Project was proactive in identifying the

leakage and was thorough and conservative in assessing the potential causes of the leakage and in

completing repairs for the leakage,” Special Inspection Team leader Russ Bywater reported at the

meeting.

Following a review of the licensee’s activities, which includes a commitment to

implement a continued monitoring program, the NRC has concluded that STP officials have

taken all the actions necessary to ensure a safe restart of Unit 1. 

“... NRC has concluded that you have taken all necessary actions with respect to the

bottom-mounted instrumentation penetration leakage issue to support the safe restart of STP, 
- 2 -

Unit 1,” Dwight D. Chamberlain, Region IV Acting Deputy Regional Administrator, said in a

letter to STP Nuclear Operating Company officials. “The NRC also concluded that your

previous inspections and planned future inspections of STP Unit 2, support the continued safe

operation of STP Unit 2.”

NRC resident inspectors at the site and staff in the NRC’s Region IV office in Arlington,

TX, will monitor the licensee’s restart activities.

A copy of the letter to STP and accompanying documents is available electronically on

the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/bottom-head-penetration-leakage/bottomhead-penetration-files/07-31-03-se-restart.pdf

###
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Petitioner,

v.

DAVID GUFFEY,

Respondent.

No. 4D17-465

[October 18, 2017]

Petition for writ of prohibition to the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ilona M. Holmes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

10-15148 CF10B.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Donna M. Perry, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, 

Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional 

Counsel, West Palm Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is granted, and the order 

precluding the state from seeking the death penalty is quashed. State v. 

Lopez, 219 So. 3d 865 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017); State v. Chapman, No. 4D17-

428, 2017 WL 3727098 (Fla. 4th DCA Aug. 30, 2017).

Petition granted.

GERBER, C.J., CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region II

101 Marietta St., Suite 2900

Atlanta, GA 30323

No: II-96-99 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: Ken Clark (404) 331-5503 (December 5, 1996)

Roger Hannah (404) 331-7878

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $50,000 FINE AGAINST

SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY AT FARLEY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $50,000

civil penalty against Southern Nuclear Operating Company for alleged

noncompliance with federal requirements related to fire protection

at the Farley nuclear power plant near Columbia, Alabama.

The violation involves three examples where the plant staff

failed to assure that one-hour fire barriers, called Kaowool

enclosures, were installed on electrical cables associated with

systems required for the safe shutdown of the plant. While no fire

occurred, the degraded fire barriers increased the vulnerability of

safety-related equipment to potential fire hazard or damage.

In a letter to Southern Nuclear dated December 4, Stewart D.

Ebneter, Administrator of the NRC's Region II office in Atlanta,

said that although the plant's corrective actions were ultimately

comprehensive, they were not timely. Multiple discrepancies were

identified over a several month period, and the plant staff did not

institute the necessary positive actions to fully assess the extent

of the condition until the NRC identified examples of missing

Kaowool.

The company has 30 days to either pay the fine or to protest

its imposition.

#
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-03-011 March 19, 2003

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

 

NRC TO MEET WITH SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS

 SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT VOGTLE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Southern Nuclear Operating

Company officials on Tuesday, April 1, to discuss the results of NRC’s annual assessment of safety

performance at the Vogtle nuclear power plant near Waynesboro, Georgia, about 30 miles south of

Augusta.

The meeting will be held at 1:00 p.m. in Room 504 of the Vogtle Training Center at 9034 River

Road in Waynesboro. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be

available before the conclusion of the meeting to answer any questions.

A letter from the NRC to Southern Nuclear addresses plant safety performance during the

previous year and forms the basis for the meeting discussions. The letter states that, overall, Vogtle 

operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and that plant performance was at a level

requiring no additional NRC inspection beyond normal baseline activities. The letter, which is

available from Region II Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/vog_2002q4.pdf , says the NRC staff will

continue inspections of the plant’s implementation of NRC security advisories and Orders to evaluate

compliance with new requirements that may be ordered.

 Current performance indicators for the two units at the Vogtle plant are available at 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/VOG1/vog1_chart.html and

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/VOG2/vog2_chart.html

###
### SUBCHAPTER III—SEPARATION AND RETIREMENT OF OFFICERS
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT KENNY DENARD BLACKMON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-4667 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ )
Opinion filed May 11, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Chet A. Tharpe, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Chelsea S. Alper, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.