alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2263a. Aquatic invasive species research

#### (a) In general

As part of the ongoing activities of the Engineer Research and Development Center to address the spread and impacts of aquatic invasive species, the Secretary shall undertake research on the prevention, management, and eradication of aquatic invasive species, including Asian carp, elodea, hydrilla, quagga mussels, and zebra mussels.

#### (b) Locations

In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall work with Corps of Engineers district offices representing diverse geographical regions of the continental United States that are impacted or could be impacted in the future by aquatic invasive species, such as the Atlantic, Pacific, Arctic, and Gulf Coasts, the Great Lakes, and reservoirs operated and maintained by the Secretary.

#### (c) Report

Not later than 180 days after October 23, 2018, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report recommending a plan to address the spread and impacts of aquatic invasive species.

(Pub. L. 115–270, title I, §1108, Oct. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 3774; Pub. L. 116–260, div. AA, title V, §502, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2744; Pub. L. 117–263, div. H, title LXXXI, §8305(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3778.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018, and also as part of the America's Water Infrastructure Act of 2018, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–263 inserted ", hydrilla" after "elodea".

2020—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–260, §502(1), substituted "prevention, management," for "management" and inserted ", elodea, quagga mussels," after "Asian carp".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 116–260, §502(2), inserted "or could be impacted in the future" after "that are impacted" and substituted "Pacific, Arctic, and Gulf Coasts, the Great Lakes, and reservoirs operated and maintained by the Secretary." for "Pacific, and Gulf coasts and the Great Lakes."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 102 of Pub. L. 115–270, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
### §52. Patents or homesteads subject to vested and accrued water rights

All patents granted, or homesteads allowed, shall be subject to any vested and accrued water rights, or rights to ditches and reservoirs used in connection with such water rights,1 as may have been acquired under or recognized by section 51 of this title.

(R.S. §2340; Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 561, §4, 26 Stat. 1097.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2340 derived from act July 9, 1870, ch. 235, §17, 16 Stat. 218.

Section is also set out as the second par. of section 661 of Title 43, Public Lands.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal; Savings Provision

Provision of this section, ", or rights to ditches and reservoirs used in connection with such water rights," was repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §706(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2793, effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976, insofar as applicable to the issuance of rights-of-way over, upon, under, and through the public lands and lands in the National Forest System. Such repeal not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of Title 43, Public Lands.

#### Submerged Lands Act

Provisions of this section as not amended, modified or repealed by the Submerged Lands Act, see section 1303 of Title 43, Public Lands.

1 See Repeal; Savings Provision note below.
### §439c. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 439c was editorially reclassified as section 30115 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6953

WILLIAM T. MCGHEE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT HURLEY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-01-186-5-H)

Submitted: September 6, 2001 Decided: September 14, 2001

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William T. McGhee, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William T. McGhee, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West

Supp. 2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2001).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. McGhee v. Hurley,

No. CA-01-186-5-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 2001). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### Science support for salt pond restoration and management in south San Francisco Bay

By: Kathleen M. SwansonGregory ShellenbargerKathleen D. HendersonJeanne S. DiLeoDavid H. Schoellhamer**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20043135

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 19, 2019

t0618

Order 

Clerk

June 19, 2019

148981 (33)(39)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148981

COA: 319642

Muskegon CC: 12-062665-FH

PAUL J. BETTS, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to strike is GRANTED. The motion to take 

judicial notice is DENIED.
§ 201.3 Commission offices, mailing address, and hours. ( a ) *Offices.* The Commission's offices are located in the United States International Trade Commission Building on 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC.
( b ) *Mailing address.* All communications to the Commission should be addressed to the “Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.”
( c ) *Hours.* The business hours of the Commission are from 8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m., eastern standard or daylight savings time, whichever is in effect in Washington, DC. Any document filed with the Secretary of the Commission after 5:15 p.m. will be considered filed the next business day. If filing on that day would be untimely, the filing may not be accepted unless a request is made for acceptance of a late filing for good cause shown pursuant to 201.14(b)(2).
[45 FR 80276, Dec. 4, 1980, as amended at 68 FR 32973, June 3, 2003]
#### Emma Fleming et al., Respondents, v. George Sickles Realty Corp., Appellant.

Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2







CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Allan J. Kent, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Allan J. Kent

------------------





Allan J. Kent

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

August 10, 2005
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jean Paul Roy, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for the periods presented.

















/s/ Jean
Paul Roy


------------------------


Jean Paul
Roy


President
and Chief Executive Officer


August 5,
2009
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-151 December 1, 2004

NRC ANNOUNCES OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING ON APPLICATION

TO RENEW OPERATING LICENSES FOR BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced the opportunity to request a hearing on an

application to renew the operating licenses for the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2.

The Brunswick units are boiling water nuclear reactors, located near Southport, N.C. Carolina

Power & Light Co., now doing business as Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc., submitted the renewal

application Oct. 20. The current operating licenses for Units 1 and 2 expire on Sept 8, 2016, and

Dec. 27, 2014, respectively.

The NRC staff has determined that the application contains sufficient information for the

agency to formally "docket," or file, the application and begin its technical review. Docketing the

application does not preclude requesting additional information as the review proceeds; nor does it

indicate whether the Commission will grant the application.

The deadline for requesting a hearing is 60 days following publication of a notice in the Federal

Register, expected shortly. By that date, petitions must be filed by anyone whose interest may be

affected by the license renewal and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding.

A request for hearing and a petition for leave to intervene must be filed with the Secretary of

the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, Attention:

Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. They may also be submitted by facsimile to (301) 415-1101 or email to HEARINGDOCKET@nrc.gov. A copy should also be submitted to the NRC Office of General

Counsel, by facsimile to (301) 415-3725 or e-mail to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov.

Information about the license renewal process can be found on the NRC Web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html. The Brunswick renewal application is

online at http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/brunswick.html.

###
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 02, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 02, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20I0121. WILLIAM WEAVER v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

18CR0376
#### § 2421.18 Petitioner.

*Petitioner* means the party filing a petition under part 2422 of this subchapter.

[60 FR 67291, Dec. 29, 1995]
#### Donald McN. Ranney, Plaintiff, v. Habern Realty Corporation et al., Defendants, and Clarence Parker et al., Doing Business under the Name of A & P Crane Rental Co., Respondents. Habern Realty Corporation et al., Third Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. United Stone Works, Inc., Third Party Defendant-Appellant, and Heydt-Mugler Company, Inc., Third Party Defendant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P J.., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
### §1751. Secretarial authority

#### (a) Prescription of rules and regulations

The Secretary shall prescribe such rules and regulations as he deems reasonably necessary to carry out this chapter.

#### (b) Conformity with rulemaking provisions

Rules and regulations issued to implement this chapter shall be issued in conformity with section 553 of title 5, notwithstanding section 553(a)(2) of that title.

#### (c) Contracts with non-Federal Government inspectors, auditors, etc.; coordination of auditing and enforcement functions

In addition to entering into cooperative agreements or delegation of authority authorized under this chapter, the Secretary may contract with such non-Federal Government inspectors, auditors, and other persons as he deems necessary to aid in carrying out his functions under this chapter and its implementation. With respect to his auditing and enforcement functions under this chapter, the Secretary shall coordinate such functions so as to avoid to the maximum extent practicable, subjecting lessees, operators, or other persons to audits or investigations of the same subject matter by more than one auditing or investigating entity at the same time.

(Pub. L. 97–451, title III, §301, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2460.)
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-223 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 20, 1999)

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC WORKSHOP IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

ON POTENTIAL CHANGES TO HEARING PROCESS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is convening a public workshop on

October 26 and 27 in Rockville, Maryland, to solicit views on potential changes to processes

and procedures for making decisions where there is a public hearing. The effort will help the

NRC determine what changes should be made and will assist in the development of proposed

rules.

The workshop, which is open to the public, will be held in the Commission’s conference

room at agency headquarters, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The meeting is

designed to encourage open discussion on hearing process issues in a “roundtable” format.

Earlier this year, the NRC’s Office of General Counsel sent a memorandum to the

Commissioners (SECY-99-006) discussing legal requirements for agency hearings and policy

considerations for any revision in the process. The document is available to the public on the

agency’s Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/COMMISSION/SECYS/index.html#1999. The

memorandum did not make a recommendation for revising the hearing process, but instead

highlighted the pros and cons of different approaches. As a result, one of the primary issues for

consideration is the Commission’s general desire to move towards less formal proceedings.

Here is a summary of the workshop agenda:

TUESDAY, OCTOBER 26

8:30 - 9:00 a.m. -- Welcome, agenda overview and introduction of participants.

9:00 - 9:30 a.m. -- Overview of the NRC hearing process.

9:30 - 10:15 a.m. -- Discussion of emerging issues addressing agency adjudications.

10:40 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. -- Discussion of the NRC’s hearing process goals and participant

feedback.

1:15 - 2:15 p.m. -- Discussion of a formal versus an informal hearing process.

2:15 - 3 p.m. -- Examination of different informal hearing models.

3:30 - 5 p.m. -- Discussion of hearing process objectives.

5:00 -5:15 p.m. -- Preview of next day’s discussion.
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 27

8:30 - 9:30 a.m. -- Comparison of formal and informal processes. Summary discussion by

participants.

9:30 - 10:15 a.m. -- Discussion of appropriate hearing processes for NRC actions.

10:30 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. -- Discussion of possible improvements to NRC’s formal hearing

process.

Noon -- Final comments and next steps.

Those seeking additional information on the workshop should contact Francis X. Cameron,

Special Counsel for Public Liaison, Office of the General Counsel, NRC,

at 301-415-1642.

###
### §1955. Federal information clearinghouse

The Administrator, in coordination with the Interagency Committee, shall—

(1) maintain a Federal information clearinghouse on marine debris that will be available to researchers and other interested persons to improve marine debris source identification, data sharing, and monitoring efforts through collaborative research and open sharing of data; and

(2) take the necessary steps to ensure the confidentiality of such information (especially proprietary information), for any information required by the Administrator to be submitted under this section.

(Pub. L. 109–449, §6, Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3338; Pub. L. 112–213, title VI, §607, Dec. 20, 2012, 126 Stat. 1578.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2012—Par. (2). Pub. L. 112–213 struck out "by the fishing industry" after "to be submitted".
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-04-041 July 8, 2004

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO MEET WITH DETROIT FIRM ON APPARENT 

TRANSPORTATION AND STORAGE VIOLATIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet on Friday, July 16, with representatives of

Imaging Subsurface, Inc., Detroit, Michigan, to discuss three apparent violations of NRC requirements

for the safe transportation and storage of gauges containing sealed radiation sources.

The meeting, called a predecisional enforcement conference, will be held at 9 a.m. CDT at the

NRC Region III Office, 2443 Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois. The meeting is open to public

observation, and NRC officials will be available before the conclusion of the meeting to respond to

questions and comments from the public.

Imaging Subsurface uses nuclear gauges containing sealed radiation sources to test soil

conditions at road and other construction sites.

An NRC inspection in April found three apparent violations: failing to adequately secure a

gauge while it was being transported by truck, failing to have required shipping documents readily

available while the gauge was being transported, and failing to lock a second gauge or its container

while in storage. None of the apparent violations resulted in the loss of a gauge or a direct safety

hazard. The company took steps to correct the violations before the NRC inspection was completed.

“These apparent violations are similar to those identified in a 2003 inspection,” said Marc

Dapas, Director of the Region III Division of Nuclear Materials Safety. “They are of concern to the

NRC because they indicate ineffective management of the company’s radiation safety program

regarding proper and timely corrective actions for the violations found in the previous inspection.”

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that a

determination has been made that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken.

The purpose of the conference is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to

provide the licensee an opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC

inspection report; and to enable the company to outline its proposed corrective actions. 

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action, such as a fine,

will be made at the conference.
-2-

If the NRC subsequently concludes that significant enforcement action is warranted, the NRC

will post the action on the agency’s enforcement web page: 

http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/regulatory/enforcement/current.html.

###
69–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 110–769 

RELATING TO THE HOUSE PROCEDURES CONTAINED IN 

SECTION 803 OF THE MEDICARE PRESCRIPTION DRUG, 

IMPROVEMENT, AND MODERNIZATION ACT OF 2003 

JULY 23, 2008.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1368] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1368, by a record vote of 9 to 3, report the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides that section 803 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 shall 

not apply during the remainder of the 110th Congress. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 579 

Date: July 23, 2008. 

Measure: H. Res. ll. 

Motion by: Mr. McGovern. 

Summary of motion: To report the rule. 

Results: Adopted 9–3. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—Yea; Hastings (FL)—Yea; Matsui—Yea; Cardoza—Yea; Welch—Yea; Castor—Yea; Arcuri—Yea; 

Sutton—Yea; Dreier—Nay; Hastings (WA)—Nay; Sessions—Nay; 

Slaughter—Yea. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with HEARING
### §57b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 57b was editorially reclassified as section 5341 of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 57b, Pub. L. 104–53, title III, §314, Nov. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 538, provided that, effective Sept. 1, 1995, Committee on House Oversight of House of Representatives had authority to combine House of Representatives Clerk Hire Allowance, Official Expenses Allowance, and Official Mail Allowance into single allowance, to be known as the "Members' Representational Allowance" and to prescribe regulations relating to allocations, expenditures, and other matters with respect to Members' Representational Allowance.