alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2







CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Webster Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(c) | the Form 10-K Report of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(d) | the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Gregory S. MadarGregory S. Madar Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Assistant Secretary (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)Date:  March 14, 2008




Pursuant to Securities and Exchange
Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference
in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### American Mutual Liability Insurance Company, Appellant, *v.*Velletri Construction Corporation, Respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff, insurer, appeals from so much of an order of Special Term dated March 27,1953, as (1) denies plaintiff’s motion to examine defendant, the insured, before trial as to items 2, 3, 4 and 5 in the notice of motion, and (2) denies plaintiff a right to an inspection and discovery of defendant’s books itemized in such notice of motion.

*868The inspection was denied on the ground that an audit has already been made. The complaint alleges the making of the audit but the answer denies that allegation, though in an answering affidavit defendant admits an audit had been made. The denial in the pleadings, however, raises an issue as to the accuracy of the audit made and to eliminate any dispute as to the correctness thereof, the inspection should have been permitted (see Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 131). In any event plaintiff at no time made an inspection of the records referred to in items g and h. To meet the issue raised, plaintiff should not be compelled to await trial.

We think, too, the items denied in the examination of defendant before trial should have been allowed. It is true that in plaintiff’s other appeal (see *ante,*p. 500) we have dismissed defendant’s separate defense of negligence. But the issues raised by defendant’s denials in the answer still remain. Limitation of the examination closes to plaintiff a vital source of proof to disprove the averments contained in the defendant’s denials which present issues requiring the examination asked.

The order so far as appealed from should be modified, with costs to plaintiff-appellant, to permit plaintiff to examine defendant as to items 2, 3, 4 and 5 and to permit plaintiff a discovery and inspection of defendant’s books and records enumerated in plaintiff’s notice of motion. Settle order.

Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Bastow and Botein, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously modified in accordance with the opinion herein and, as so modified, affirmed. Settle order on notice.
§ 250.203 Strategic human capital management systems and standards. Strategic human capital management systems, standards, and focus areas are defined within the Human Capital Framework (HCF). The four systems described below provide definitions and standards for human capital planning, implementation, and evaluation. The HCF systems and standards are: ( a ) *Strategic planning and alignment.* A system that ensures agency human capital programs are aligned with agency mission, goals, and objectives through analysis, planning, investment, and measurement. The standards for the strategic planning and alignment system require an agency to ensure their human capital management strategies, plans, and practices— ( 1 ) Integrate strategic plans, annual performance plans and goals, and other relevant budget, finance, and acquisition plans;
( 2 ) Contain measurable and observable performance targets; and
( 3 ) Communicate in an open and transparent manner to facilitate cross-agency collaboration to achieve mission objectives.
( b ) *Talent management.* A system that promotes a high-performing workforce, identifies and closes skill gaps, and implements and maintains programs to attract, acquire, develop, promote, and retain quality and diverse talent. The standards for the talent management system require an agency to— ( 1 ) Plan for and manage current and future workforce needs;
( 2 ) Design, develop, and implement proven strategies and techniques and practices to attract, hire, develop, and retain talent; and
( 3 ) Make progress toward closing any knowledge, skill, and competency gaps throughout the agency.
( c ) *Performance culture.* A system that engages, develops, and inspires a diverse, high-performing workforce by creating, implementing, and maintaining effective performance management strategies, practices, and activities that support mission objectives. The standards for the performance culture system require an agency to have— ( 1 ) Strategies and processes to foster a culture of engagement and collaboration;
( 2 ) A diverse, results-oriented, high-performing workforce; and
( 3 ) A performance management system that differentiates levels of performance of staff, provides regular feedback, and links individual performance to organizational goals.
( d ) *Evaluation.* A system that contributes to agency performance by monitoring and evaluating outcomes of its human capital management strategies, policies, programs, and activities by meeting the following standards— ( 1 ) Ensuring compliance with merit system principles; and
( 2 ) Identifying, implementing, and monitoring process improvements.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-2 January 7, 1999

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia,

Pa., have announced the assignment of Rick Fernandes as the

agency’s resident inspector at the Nine Mile Point nuclear power

plant in Scriba, N.Y. He joins Senior Resident Inspector Gordon

Hunegs and Resident Inspector Rick Skokowski at the two-unit site

operated by Niagara Mohawk Power Company.

Mr. Fernandes joined the NRC in 1993 as a reactor engineer

and also worked as a specialist inspector before being assigned

to his most recent position as a resident inspector at the James

A. FitzPatrick nuclear plant in 1994.

Prior to joining the NRC, Mr. Fernandes worked for General

Dynamics, Electric Boat Division in Connecticut, as a shift test

engineer, project engineer and steel trades supervisor. He

received a bachelor’s degree in marine engineering from the

Massachusetts Maritime Academy.

The NRC inspectors at Nine Mile Point can be reached at 315-

342-4041.

#
TN: DT-05-07

To: NRC Management Directives Custodians

Subject: Elimination of Management Directive 2.4, "Acquisition of

Federal Information Processing Resources"

Purpose: Directive 2.4 is being eliminated consistent with Section

5101 of the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 stating that Section

111 of the Federal Property and Administrative Services

Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 759) is repealed.

Note: Please remove material under Tab 2.4 and

discard. Do not remove Tab 2.4; it must remain in

place as a reserved number.

Office of Origin: Office of Information Services

Contact: James Baughman, 301-415-5087

Date Approved: October 25, 1995 (Revised: May 10, 2005)

Volume: 2 Information Technology

Directive: 2.4 Acquisition of Federal Information Processing

Resources

Availability: Rules and Directives Branch

Office of Administration

Michael T. Lesar, 301-415-7163

Christy Moore, 301-415-7086

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

DIRECTIVE TRANSMITTAL

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION
TN: DT-96-22

To: NRC Management Directives Custodians

Subject: Elimination of Management Directive 11.3, “NRC Review of

Contractor Invoices”

Purpose: Directive and Handbook 11.3 are eliminated.

The Office of Administration incorporated this management

directive into Management Directive 11.1, “NRC Acquisition

of Supplies and Services,” that was approved by the

Executive Director for Operations on July 23, 1996.

Note: Please remove material under Tab 11.3 and

discard. Do not remove Tab 11.3; it must remain in

place as a reserved number.

Office and

Division of Origin: Office of Administration

Division of Contracts

Contact: Mary Lynn Scott, 415-6179

Date Approved: July 23, 1996

Volume: 11 Procurement

Directive: 11.2 [RESERVED]

Availability: None

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

DIRECTIVE TRANSMITTAL

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION
§ 7.1 Puerto Rico; spirits and wines withdrawn from warehouse for shipment to; duty on foreign-grown coffee. ( a ) When spirits and wines are withdrawn from a bonded manufacturing warehouse for shipment in bond to Puerto Rico pursuant to section 311, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,[1, 2] the warehouse withdrawal shall contain on the face thereof a statement of the kind and quantity of all imported merchandise (in its condition as imported) and imported containers used in the manufacture and putting up of such spirits and wines. The duty assessed on the imported merchandise and containers so used, and their classification and value, shall be shown on the withdrawal in accordance with § 144.41 of this chapter. If no imported merchandise or containers have been used, the warehouse withdrawal shall bear an endorsement to that effect. (See §§ 191.105 and 191.106 of this chapter.)
( b ) The spirits and wines shall be forwarded in accordance with the general provisions of the regulations governing the transportation of merchandise in bond, part 18 of this chapter.
( c ) A regular entry shall be made for all foreign-grown coffee shipped to Puerto Rico from the United States, but special Customs invoices shall not be required for such shipments.[3]
(Secs. 311, 319, 484(a), 46 Stat. 691, as amended, 696, 722, as amended; 19 U.S.C. 1311, 1319, 1484(a); R.S. 251, as amended, sec. 624, 46 Stat. 759 (19 U.S.C. 66, 1624))
[28 FR 14636, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17445, July 2, 1973; T.D. 83-212, 48 FR 46770, Oct. 14, 1983; T.D. 98-16, 63 FR 11004, Mar. 5, 1998] Footnotes -
7.1
[1] [Reserved]
[2] “* * * Distilled spirits and wines which are rectified in bonded manufacturing warehouses, class six, and distilled spirits which are reduced in proof and bottled in such warehouses, shall be deemed to have been manufactured within the meaning of this section and may be withdrawn as hereinbefore provided, and likewise for shipment in bond to Puerto Rico, subject to the provisions of this section, and under such regulations as the Secretary of the Treasury may prescribe, there to be withdrawn for consumption or be rewarehoused and subsequently withdrawn for consumption: *Provided,* That upon withdrawal in Puerto Rico for consumption, the duties imposed by the customs laws of the United States shall be collected on all imported merchandise (in its condition as imported) and imported containers used in the manufacture and putting up of such spirits and wines in such warehouses: *Provided further,* That no internal-revenue tax shall be imposed on distilled spirits and wines rectified in class six warehouses if such distilled spirits and wines are exported or shipped in accordance with the provisions of this section, * * *.” (Tariff Act of 1930, sec. 311, as amended; 19 U.S.C. 1311)
[3] Section 319, Tariff Act of 1930, authorizes the Legislature of Puerto Rico to impose a duty on coffee imported into Puerto Rico, including coffee grown in a foreign country coming into Puerto Rico from the United States, and the Legislature of Puerto Rico has imposed such a duty.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3620] 

In accordance with a notice received from the Department of Homeland Security—Federal Emergency Management Agency—effective October 8, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning September 3, 2004, and continuing through October 8, 2004. 

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.,*                     the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is December 11, 2004 and for economic injury the deadline is June 6, 2005.                 
      ( print page 62111)    
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) 

Dated: October 14, 2004. 

Cheri L. Cannon, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 04-23640 Filed 10-21-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### § 1820.15 Service of requests or demands.

Requests or demands for official records or information or testimony under this subpart must be served by mail to the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, Office of General Counsel, 1730 M Street NW, Suite 218, Washington, DC 20036-4505; or by email to *ogc@osc.gov.* The subject line should read “Touhy Request.”
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-04-017 March 31, 2004

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC TO DISCUSS ANNUAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

OF LIMERICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Exelon

Nuclear on Thursday, April 8, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual assessment of safety

performance at the Limerick nuclear power plant. Exelon operates the twin-reactor plant, which

is located in Limerick, Pa.

 The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at

6 p.m. at the Limerick Township Municipal Building, 646 W. Ridge Pike in Limerick. Before

the session is adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the public on the

plant’s safety performance, as well as the role of the NRC in ensuring safe operation of the

facility.

 The performance period to be discussed is January 1 to December 31, 2003. In

addition, NRC staff will provide a brief overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process

works.

 A letter sent from the NRC Region I Office to plant officials addresses the performance

of the plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is

available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/lim_2003q4.pdf .

 Overall, the Limerick plant operated safely and met all cornerstone objectives during

the period. (Cornerstones are program areas where NRC measures plant safety performance.) 

Therefore, at this time the NRC plans to conduct only baseline inspections at the site through

September 30, 2005.

 With regard to security issues, the NRC has issued several orders and threat advisories

to enhance security capabilities and improve guard force readiness since the terrorist attacks on

September 11, 2001. The agency has also conducted inspections to review the implementation of
-2-

these requirements and has monitored the action of plant operators in response to changing threat

conditions. The NRC will continue security inspections during 2004.

 Current performance information for the Limerick Unit 1 plant is available on the NRC

web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LIM1/lim1_chart.html .

 Current performance information for the Limerick Unit 2 plant is available on the NRC

web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LIM2/lim2_chart.html .

 ###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-125 September 9, 2005

NRC RECEIVES AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE IN PERFORMANCE AND

ACCOUNTABILITY REPORTING

For the fourth consecutive year, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission received a

prestigious award recognizing the quality of its annual performance and accountability reporting. The

Association of Government Accountants (AGA) awarded the NRC the Certificate of Excellence in

Accountability Reporting for its outstanding efforts in preparing the agency’s Performance and

Accountability Report for Fiscal Year 2004.

The Certificate of Excellence is the highest form of recognition in federal government

management reporting. It rewards excellence in a federal agency’s annual illustration and assessment of

agency performance and the cost of that performance.

In its award letter, AGA complimented the NRC’s report for its “considerable information in a

very readable format” and responsiveness to suggestions from the previous year. 

NRC’s Chief Financial Officer Jesse L. Funches considers this award an important recognition

of the agency’s commitment to excellence. “We are very honored to receive this award. For the fourth

year in a row, we have shown that the NRC consistently provides the public clear, timely, and reliable

information about our performance and how we run our programs,” he said. “Thanks to the hard work

of our staff, the NRC continues to demonstrate its commitment to excellence, openness and service.”

The Certificate of Excellence in Accountability Reporting will be presented to the NRC at an

awards ceremony on September 14.

###
### §7509. Expenditures incurred by the United States Postal Service

The Postmaster General or his delegate shall at least once a month transfer to the Treasury of the United States a statement of the additional expenditures in the District of Columbia and elsewhere incurred by the United States Postal Service in performing the duties, if any, imposed upon such Service with respect to chapter 21, relating to the tax under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act, and the Secretary shall be authorized and directed to advance from time to time to the credit of the United States Postal Service, from appropriations made for the collection of the taxes imposed by chapter 21, such sums as may be required for such additional expenditures incurred by the United States Postal Service.

(Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 899; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(a)(52), (b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1832, 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Insurance Contributions Act, referred to in text, is act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, §§3101, 3102, 3111, 3112, 3121 to 3128, 68A Stat. 415, which is classified generally to chapter 21 (§3101 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 3128 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 substituted "United States Postal Service" for "Post Office Department" in section catchline and wherever appearing in text, "such Service" for "such Department", and struck out ", together with the receipts required to be deposited under section 6803(a)," after "Treasury of the United States" and "or his delegate" after "Secretary".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–455 effective first day of first month which begins more than 90 days after Oct. 4, 1976, see section 1906(d)(1) of Pub. L. 94–455, set out as a note under section 6013 of this title.
**Exhibit 23.0**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public AccountingFirm**

 

 

The Board of DirectorsEFC Bancorp, Inc.:

 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementon Form S-8 (No. 333-68743) of EFC Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated March 14,2005, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of EFC Bancorp, Inc. andsubsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidatedstatements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for eachof the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, which reportappears in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of EFC Bancorp,Inc.

 

 
|   | /s/ KPMG LLP |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 14, 2005

 

----
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-05-0121 - Request to Consider Developing a Formal Tribal Consultation Protocol

Accession Number: ML051800199

Date Released: Friday, July 22, 2005

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML051800315 - SECY-05-0121 - Request to Consider Developing a Formal Tribal Consultation Protocol (7 page(s), 7/7/2005)
    - ML051380354 - Expression of Appreciation for Hosting meeting with the YRITWC during February 2005. (1 page(s), 5/16/2005)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer