alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1631.19 Preservation of records. ( a ) The Board must preserve all correspondence pertaining to the requests that it receives as well as copies of all requested records, until disposition or destruction is authorized by the Board's General Records Schedule of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) or other NARA-approved records retention schedule.
( b ) Materials that are identified as responsive to a FOIA request will not be disposed of or destroyed while the request or a related appeal of lawsuit is pending. This is true even if they would otherwise be authorized for disposition under the Board's General Records Schedule of NARA or other NARA-approved records schedule.
[82 FR 24828, May 31, 2017]
### §453. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 453 was editorially reclassified as section 30143 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-05-042 November 3, 2005

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH DOMINION GENERATION CO. OFFICIALS

TO DISCUSS POSSIBLE EQUIPMENT FLOODING ISSUES AT KEWAUNEE PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet Nov. 8 in Lisle, Ill., with representatives

of Dominion Generation Co. to discussion the safety significance of possible flooding issues at the

Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant. The facility is located at Kewaunee, Wis.

The meeting will be at 1 p.m. in the NRC Region III Office, Suite 210, 2443 Warrenville Rd.,

Lisle. The meeting is open to public observation. At the conclusion of the business portion of the

meeting, members of the public may make comments and ask questions of the NRC staff.

An NRC inspection in Sept. 2004, found that under certain circumstances, the turbine building

could flood and cause a malfunction of safety equipment needed for safe shutdown of the plant. The

preliminary safety significance of the issue was determined to be greater than “green”which means

more than very low safety significance.

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at nuclear power plants with a color-coded system

which classifies findings as green, white, yellow, and red, in increasing order of significance. 

The utility entered a forced outage in Feb. 2005 to make extensive system and structural

modifications to address the problem.

“This apparent violation is of concern to us because the utility missed an earlier opportunity to

discover and correct this issue in 2003, when minor flooding in the turbine building challenged the

function of certain safety equipment,” said James Caldwell, NRC Regional Administrator. “We will

continue to monitor the plant’s ability to effectively identify and solve problems.”

Following the regulatory conference, Kewaunee performance improvement initiatives will be

discussed.

No decision on the final safety significance, apparent violations or possible enforcement action

will be made during the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a later time.
NRC Inspection Report 050011, issued Oct. 6, covering the flooding issues, is available in the

NRC’s online document library, known as ADAMS: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html. Use accession number ML052800430 to

locate the report. 

###
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             590
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,361
<ALLOWANCES>                                       447
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,046
<PP&E>                                           1,623
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,481
<BONDS>                                         12,060
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            63
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,487)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,084
<SALES>                                         20,813
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,813
<CGS>                                            9,367
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,040
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     3
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   302
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (333)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (14)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (319)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (583)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)


</TABLE>
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JOSE ALFONSO M ONR OY-OLAGUE, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 13-73794 Age n c y No. A205-156-533 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d De c e m

be r 9, 2015 ** B e fore : WALLAC E, R AW LINSON, a

n d IKUTA, C irc uit Judge s. Jose Alfonso M o nroy -Ola gue , a native an d c itiz e n of M e xic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ orde r dism issing his a p pe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) de c ision de ny ing his a pplic ation for c anc e lla

tion of re m ova l. W e dismiss thepe tition for re vie w. 

# FIL ED DEC 15 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).W e la c k jurisdic tion to re vie w the a ge nc y ’ s disc re t iona ry de c ision, pursua

nt to 8 U.S.C . § 1101(f) (fina l pa ra gra ph), tha t M onroy -Ola gue la c k e d good m ora l c ha ra c te r. Se eLope

z-C aste l lanos v . Gonzale

s , 437 F.3d 848, 854 (9th C ir. 2006). M onroy -Ola gue ’ s c onte ntion c h a lle nging theIJ’ s c onside ration of thee quitie s in his c a se doe s not c onstitute a c olora ble c o nstitutiona

l c la im or que stion of la

w tha t would invoke

our jurisdic t ion. Se e 8 U.S.C . § 1252(a)(2)(D); se ealso Bazua-C ota v . Gonzale

s , 466 F.3d 747, 748-49 (9th C ir. 2006) (while“ [t] his c ourt re ta ins jurisdic tion ove r pe titions for re vie w tha t ra ise c olora

ble c onstitutiona

l c la im s or que stions of la

w,” a pe titione r m ay

not a tta c k a disc re tiona

ry de c ision sim

ply by phra sing his a

buse of disc re tion c ha l le nge a s a que stion of la

w). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDISM ISSE D.

1 3 - 7 3 7 9 4 2
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jean Paul Roy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ Jean Paul Roy

------------------------





Jean Paul Roy

President and Chief Executive Officer

November 10, 2004
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 05-133 September 28, 2005

 NRC UPDATES AGING MANAGEMENT DOCUMENT

 FOR REVIEWING REACTOR LICENSE RENEWAL REQUESTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued the first revision of its Generic Aging Lessons

Learned (GALL) Report, a key document in the agency’s process for reviewing applications to renew

reactor operating licenses.

The report’s revisions stem from lessons learned during more than 15 license renewal reviews,

which covered more than 30 reactors, conducted by the agency since 1998. The original report, issued

in July 2001, included 48 examples of aging management programs. Almost all of the 48 examples are

updated in the revised report and nine more programs have been added. The revised GALL Report also

includes a new chapter on standardized aging-management terminology.

“The revised GALL Report gives us even more information to use in determining whether

reactors can be operated safely beyond their original 40-year license,” said Pao-Tsin Kuo, Director of

License Renewal and Environmental Impacts in the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. “We

will continue learning from current reviews and consider further GALL enhancements as necessary.”

The GALL Report catalogs the structures and components found in a nuclear power plant. NRC

reviewers use the report’s matrix of materials and environments, as well as aging effects and

mechanisms, to judge whether a plant’s aging management program is acceptable. The NRC staff

asked for public input during the revision process, and considered these comments in the final report.

As part of this process, the NRC also revised its Standard Review Plan for license renewal

applications, as well as the standard format and content requirements for license renewal applications,

based on the GALL report revisions and lessons learned during previous license renewals.

The revised GALL Report’s two volumes are available online from the NRC’s electronic

document database, ADAMS. Volume 1 can be retrieved by entering ML052110005, and Volume 2 by

entering ML052110006, in the ADAMS search engine at this Web address:

http://adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm . The Standard Review Plan and application

format/content guide can be retrieved by entering ML052110007 and ML051920430, respectively.

###
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United StatesCode), the undersigned officer of LATAM Airlines Group S.A. (“the Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) ofthe Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

Dated: March 29, 2017 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United StatesCode), the undersigned officer of LATAM Airlines Group S.A. (“the Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) ofthe Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

Dated: March 29, 2017 

 

/s/    Ramiro AlfonsinBalza        
Ramiro Alfonsin BalzaCFO LATAM
### §6305. Using cooperative agreements

An executive agency shall use a cooperative agreement as the legal instrument reflecting a relationship between the United States Government and a State, a local government, or other recipient when—

(1) the principal purpose of the relationship is to transfer a thing of value to the State, local government, or other recipient to carry out a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by a law of the United States instead of acquiring (by purchase, lease, or barter) property or services for the direct benefit or use of the United States Government; and

(2) substantial involvement is expected between the executive agency and the State, local government, or other recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated in the agreement.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1004.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6305 | 41:505. | Feb. 3, 1978, Pub. L. 95–224, §6, 92 Stat. 5. |

The words "type of" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "money, property, services" are omitted as being included in "a thing of value". The words "law of the United States" are substituted for "Federal statute" for consistency.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Implementation of North American Wetlands Conservation Act and North American Waterfowl Management Plan

Pub. L. 102–154, title I, Nov. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 995, provided that: "Notwithstanding the provisions of the Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreements Act of 1977 (31 U.S.C. 6301–6308), the Fish and Wildlife Service is hereafter authorized to negotiate and enter into cooperative arrangements and grants with public and private agencies, organizations, institutions, and individuals to implement on a public-private cost sharing basis, the North American Wetlands Conservation Act [16 U.S.C. 4401 et seq.] and the North American Waterfowl Management Plan".

#### Printing of Educational Materials and Continuation of Challenge Cost-Share Program

Pub. L. 102–154, title II, Nov. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1018, provided that: "Notwithstanding the provisions of the Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreements Act of 1977 (31 U.S.C. 6301–6308), the Forest Service is authorized hereafter to negotiate and enter into cooperative arrangements with public and private agencies, organizations, institutions, and individuals to print educational materials and to continue the Challenge Cost-Share Program."

#### Bureau of Land Management; Authorization To Use Cooperative Arrangements To Implement Challenge Cost-Share Programs

Pub. L. 101–512, title I, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1918, provided in part that: "the Bureau [of Land Management] is authorized hereafter to negotiate and enter into cooperative arrangements with public and private agencies, organizations, institutions, and individuals, to implement challenge cost-share programs."
#### Wilson and others *vs.*Wintermute and wife.

An application to amend a sworn answer, on the ground of mistake discovered at the time the answer was read to the party making it, made more than two years after the discovery and filing of the answer, without excuse for the delay, and upon feeble and unsatisfactory proof of the alleged mistake, refused.

*64Motion to amend answer.

*Mr. Wm. Luse,*for motion..

*Mr. Wm. H. Morrow,, mnirm.*

The Chancellor.

The defendant, Ensilla "Wintermute, applies for leave to> amend her separate answer,.by qualifying an admission therein that her husband was, as stated in the bill, the owner of certain promissory notes, &c.,. in her hands, for the recovery whereof this suit was instituted. From this admission, she-would except a note of $400, which she alleges was her own property. The ground of the application is mistake. She1 says she discovered, after the answer had been sworn to, that the admission embraced that note, and she says she spoke toiler solicitor on the subject and suggested that the error should be corrected, but was then informed by him that it could only be corrected by leave of the court, for which he promised to-apply. Whether the answer had been filed when the discovery was made, does not appear. It was filed on the 30th of May, 1873. She says it was when the answer was read over to her that she discovered the mistake. She has permitted more than two years to elapse before making an application to amend, and there seems to be no excuse for the delay. Besides, the proof of the alleged mistake is by no-means satisfactory ; she should have given a direct and clear statement of the circumstances. Her testimony too, as to the-ownership of the note, a point on which positiveness was to be-expected, is strikingly feeble and evasive..

The- motion must be denied..
CAUSE NO. 12-15-00048-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

CHASE ALLEN GILLIAM, } APPEALED FROM 173RD DISTRICT COURT

APPELLANT

V. } IN AND FOR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, } HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEE

ORDER

Appellant is represented by Mr. Samuel M. Smith, appointed counsel. On February 26,

2015, this Court notified Appellant’s counsel that a Docketing Statement was to be filed and

gave him until March 9, 2015, to file it. TEX. R. APP. P. 32.2. Thereafter, when no Docketing

Statement was filed, Appellant’s counsel was again notified on March 12, 2015, that the

Docketing Statement was past due and was given until March 23, 2015, to file a Docketing

Statement. As of the date of this Order, no satisfactory response has been received.

Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 32.2 it is ORDERED that the Honorable Mark A. Calhoon,

Judge of the 173rd District Court of Henderson County, shall immediately conduct a hearing to

determine the cause of counsel’s failure to file the Docketing Statement and whether the

Appellant has abandoned the appeal.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court determine whether: (1) Appellant is

indigent and entitled to the appointment of counsel on appeal; (2) Appellant has sufficient funds

to retain counsel; or (3) Appellant desires to represent himself on appeal.

It is ADDITIONALLY ORDERED that once findings are made as to the above issues,

the trial court shall appoint counsel, give Appellant an appropriate deadline for retaining counsel,

or administer the appropriate warnings concerning the dangers of self-representation, in

FILE COPY
accordance with its findings and the court shall also take necessary action to insure the prompt

filing of the Docketing Statement with this Court.

It is FINALLY ORDERED that a supplemental record containing the court’s findings of

fact and conclusions of law and any appropriate order(s) attendant thereto be certified to this

Court on or before June 18, 2015.

WITNESS the Honorable James T. Worthen, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, 12th

Court of Appeals District of Texas, at Tyler.

GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF SAID COURT, at my office this the

19th day of May 2015, A.D.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

12TH COURT OF APPEALS

By: ________________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
### §287. Establishment

There is hereby established in the House of Representatives an office to be known as the Office of the Parliamentarian, hereinafter in this chapter referred to as the "Office".

(Pub. L. 95–94, title I, §115, Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 668.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is based on section 1 of House Resolution No. 502, Ninety-fifth Congress, Apr. 20, 1977, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 95–94.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section 6 of House Resolution No. 502, Apr. 20, 1977, as enacted into permanent law by section 115 of Pub. L. 95–94, provided that: "This resolution [this chapter] shall take effect as of March 1, 1977, and shall continue in effect until otherwise provided by law."
Fw:Changes to MT Regional Haze Public Hearing Dates Changes to MT Regional Haze Public Hearing Dates

Monica Morales Monica Morales to: Crystal Freeman 04/12/2012 01:42 PM

For the docket.

Monica S. Morales, Unit Chief

Air Quality Planning Unit

Air Program (8P-AR)

U.S. EPA Region 8

1595 Wynkoop Street

Denver, CO 80202-1129

phone (303) 312-6936

fax (303) 312-6064

----- Forwarded by Monica Morales/R8/USEPA/US on 04/12/2012 01:36 PM -----

From: Monica Morales/R8/USEPA/US

To: "Habeck, Bob" <BHabeck@mt.gov>

Date: 03/23/2012 08:16 AM

Subject: RE: Changes to MT Regional Haze Public Hearing Dates

It will be 60 days from the date of publication of the action in the Federal Register.

Monica S. Morales, Unit Chief

Air Quality Planning Unit

Air Program (8P-AR)

U.S. EPA Region 8

1595 Wynkoop Street

Denver, CO 80202-1129

phone (303) 312-6936

fax (303) 312-6064

"Habeck, Bob" OK - thanks. What is the final day (date) that yo... 03/23/2012 08:07:29 AM

From: "Habeck, Bob" <BHabeck@mt.gov>

To: Monica Morales/R8/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 03/23/2012 08:07 AM

Subject: RE: Changes to MT Regional Haze Public Hearing Dates

OK – thanks. What is the final day (date) that you will receive public comments following these 

presentations?

Bob Habeck

Air Program Manager

Montana Dept. of Environ. Quality

Helena, MT 59620

(406) 444-7305 w

(406) 431-1359 c

(406) 444-1499 f
bhabeck@mt.gov

From: Monica Morales [mailto:Morales.Monica@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 4:01 PM

To: Klemp, Dave; Julie DalSoglio; Carson Coate; Merchant, Eric; Habeck, Bob

Cc: Carl Daly

Subject: Changes to MT Regional Haze Public Hearing Dates

I wanted you all to know, as soon as possible, that we had to change the dates for the public hearings in 

Montana for the Regional Haze proposed action. We realized that we have to ensure that following a 

public hearing that the comment period remains open for at least 30 additional days. Due to the deadline 

for signing our final action, we could not allow more than 60 days for public comment, so we have moved 

the hearing dates to May 1st in Helena and May 2nd in Billings. We will be in the same locations. 

However, the large room at the library in Helena is not available until 1:30 pm, so the public hearing will be 

held from 2-5:30 pm and 6:30-9:00 pm. The hours for the Billings hearing are the same as before. Sorry

for the change. 

These changes will be reflected in the notice that is published in the Federal Register. 

Monica S. Morales, Unit Chief

Air Quality Planning Unit

Air Program (8P-AR)

U.S. EPA Region 8

1595 Wynkoop Street

Denver, CO 80202-1129

phone (303) 312-6936

fax (303) 312-6064
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

AdolescentsChildrenCommunity RoleConflict ResolutionDelinquencyElementary Secondary EducationEmotional ResponseInterpersonal CommunicationMass Media RolePreventionProblem ChildrenSchool RoleViolenceYouth ProblemsYouth Programs

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget