alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a)



I, Allan J. Kent, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of GeoGlobal Resources Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such  disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small  business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 10, 2004

/s/ Allan J. Kent

------------------------

Allan J. Kent

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Sam Steele et al., Respondents-Appellants, *v.*Tool Chaft Corporation et al., Appellants-Respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

We find the first, second, third and fifth causes of action as presently pleaded sufficient to withstand the .test of a motion to dismiss. It is not necessary to consider the fourth cause of action because that is against a defendant who was not served, did not appear and made no motion to dismiss. Accordingly the fourth cause of action should not have been dismissed.

*990The order appealed from, insofar as it denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the fifth cause of action should be 'affirmed, and, insofar as it granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the first four causes of action, should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the plaintiffs, and the motion in all respect^ denied.

Present — Townley, UntermyeT, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Order, insofar as it denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the fifth cause of action, unanimously affirmed, and, insofar as it granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the first four causes of action, reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the plaintiffs, and the motion in all respects denied. -
#### Wayne NICOLAISON, Appellant, v. David ROWLEY; David Dyson, Appellees.

No. 02-1134.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 6, 2002.

Filed May 7, 2002.

Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Wayne Nicolaison is an involuntarily committed person at the Minnesota Sexual Psychopathic Personality Treatment Center (“Center”). He brought the instant action, claiming a Center employee and an Assistant Attorney General violated the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments by searching and seizing information from his personal computer and by using that information against him at a court proceeding. *279The district court1 denied Nicolaison’s motion for a default judgment, and dismissed the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

Upon de novo review, *see Whitmore v. Harrington,*204 F.3d 784, 784 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that Nicolaison failed to state either a Fourth or Fourteenth Amendment claim. We also find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Nicolaison’s motion for a default judgment. *See Harris v. St. Louis Police Dep’t,*164 F.3d 1085, 1086 (8th Cir.1998) (per curiam).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny as moot Nicolaison’s motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis because the district court already granted him such leave.

1

. The HONORABLE RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the HONORABLE JOHN M. MASON, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Editorial Note on Part 356
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 356 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

§ 356.6 Receipt of notice of a class or kind of merchandise determination by the Government of a FTA country. Where the Department has made a class or kind of merchandise determination, notice of such determination shall be deemed received by the Government of a FTA country: ( a ) On the date of publication in the official publication of the determination; or
( b ) If the determination was not published in the official publication, on the date on which the Department conveys a copy of the determination to the electronic mail address provided by the Embassy of the FTA country during its normal business hours.
[86 FR 70049, Dec. 9, 2021]
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of CEO

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Gateway, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby
certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | a) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b) |  | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  | 
|------------------------ |  |  | 
|Dated: November 14, 2003 |  |  | 
|                         |  |  |
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                                 CERTIFICATION
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Energy Homes, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 3, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Keith O. Holdbrooks
--------------------------------
Keith O. Holdbrooks
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2003

/s/ James L. Stariha
--------------------------------
James L. Stariha
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2003


This certification accompanies this Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and is not filed as part of the Form 10-Q or
as a separate disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                      25
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAWN A. VANDERSLICE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 576 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Order entered September 8, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-10-00690-CV

ARGO DATA RESOURCE CORPORATION AND MAX MARTIN, Appellants

V.

BALKRISHNA SHAGRITHAYA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 07-15149-I

ORDER

Appellants ARGO Data Resource Corporation and Max Martin’s joint motion to correct 

the appellate bill of costs filed on September 3, 2014 is hereby GRANTED. Contemporaneous 

with this Order, the Clerk of the Court will issue an amended and corrected appellate bill of costs 

in the above referenced cause. 

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 208 (Thursday, October 28, 2004)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 63037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24301]



[[Page 63035]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part V





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Presidential Determination No. 2005-04 of October 20, 2004--
Presidential Determination on Use of Cooperative Threat Reduction Funds 
in Albania Under Section 1308 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2004



Memorandum of October 21, 2004--Delegation of Certain Functions Related 
to the Sudan Peace Act


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 208 / Thursday, October 28, 2004 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 63037]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2005-04 of October 20, 
                2004

                
Presidential Determination on Use of Cooperative 
                Threat Reduction Funds in Albania under Section 1308 of 
                the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
                2004

                Memorandum for the Secratary of State

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 1308 
                of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
                Year 2004 (Public Law 108-136) (the ``Act''), I hereby 
                determine that the obligation and expenditure of 
                Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) funds for the 
                destruction of chemical warfare agents stockpiled in 
                Albania, will permit the United States to take 
                advantage of an opportunity to achieve long-standing 
                nonproliferation goals. I also determine that this 
                project to destroy the chemical warfare agents 
                stockpiled in Albania will be completed within a short 
                period of time and that the Department of Defense is 
                the entity of the Federal Government that is most 
                capable of carrying out this project.

                You are authorized and directed to transmit this 
                determination, along with the justification and project 
                description required by section 1308(d)(2) of the Act, 
                to the Congress no later than 10 days after the 
                obligation of funds for this project and to arrange for 
                the publication of this memorandum in the Federal 
                Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, October 20, 2004.

[FR Doc. 04-24301
Filed 10-27-04; 9:31 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
#### Joseph Ungar, Defendant in Error, v. E. F. Snydacker, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 19,104.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. Caverly, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 23, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Joseph Ungar against E. F. Snydacker to recover a balance claimed to be dne to plaintiff from defendant for work in making alterations on defendant’s house. The plaintiff’s claim was for labor performed for twenty and one-half days at four dollars per day, and for certain materials purchased for defendant at his request. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for eighty-two dollars, defendant brings error.

Mayer, Meyer, Austrian & Platt, for plaintiff in error.

Louis Brandes, for defendant in error.

Abstract of the Decision.

Master and servant, § *84*
      ***
      *—when judgment for wages sustained by the evidence.*In an action for a balance alleged to be due for work and certain materials furnished by plaintiff, in making alterations for defendant’s house, the defense being that there was a verbal agreement that plaintiff was to furnish all materials and that seven hundred and fifty dollars was to he the maximum sum to be paid by defendant for the necessary labor and materials, *held*that a verdict for plaintiff on conflicting evidence was not manifestly against the weight of the evidence.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number, ...

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-05-010 March 30, 2005

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC FINDS EMERGENCY PLAN VIOLATION AT PERRY NUCLEAR PLANT

TO BE OF LOW TO MODERATE SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued its final determination that an emergency

plan violation on July 20, 2004, at the Perry Nuclear Power Plant was of low to moderate safety

significance. The plant, operated by FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company, is in Perry, Ohio.

NRC inspectors found that the Perry plant staff did not perform an emergency radiation dose

assessment within 15 minutes as required when a radiation monitor in the plant’s ventilation system

indicated an increased level of airborne radioactivity. Other plant radiation monitors were stable and

showed normal levels of radioactivity. The plant staff subsequently determined that the elevated level

reported by the ventilation system monitor was erroneous, caused by an equipment malfunction.

Because the malfunction was not immediately detected, the plant staff appropriately declared an

Alert under its emergency plan. This is the second of four emergency classifications in increasing

severity.

The Perry emergency plan requires that the staff perform a computer-based radiation dose

assessment within 15 minutes in order to determine if a higher emergency classification is necessary. 

The dose assessment was not performed for 2 hours and 40 minutes.

The NRC staff has determined that the violation of the plant’s emergency plan procedures

constitutes a “white” finding, one of low to moderate safety significance. The NRC has a color-coded

system for assessing safety significance, ranging from green for findings of very low safety

significance through white, yellow, and red.

“We recognize that the actual safety significance of this event was low since it was caused by a

faulty radiation monitor and not by an actual increase in radiation level,” said James Caldwell, NRC

Regional Administrator. “However, following emergency procedures is important to safety. 

Determining the correct emergency classification assures that the plant has the staff and resources

ready to respond to a problem.”

White findings normally result in additional NRC inspections and meetings with the utility. 

Based on the white finding, the NRC issued a Notice of Violation to FirstEnergy for its failure to

follow emergency plan procedures. The company is required to respond to the Notice of Violation
-2-

within 30 days, describing its corrective actions and steps it is taking to prevent a recurrence of the violation.

The letter notifying FirstEnergy of the white finding will be available from the NRC’s Region

III Office of Public Affairs or in the NRC’s online document library at

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html – use accession number ML050890076 to

locate the document.

###
### SUBCHAPTER II—PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND PROVISIONS
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-04-033 April 17, 2004

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC APPROVES RESTART OF FINAL STAGE IN URANIUM

HEXAFLUORIDE PROCESS AT HONEYWELL PLANT IN ILLINOIS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff informed officials of the Honeywell International,

Inc. uranium hexafluoride processing plant in Metropolis, Illinois, on April 17 that the agency has no

objection to the restart of the final stage of a three-stage process to produce the chemical compound.

On March 27, the NRC staff authorized the company to resume ore preparation, the first stage

in a process that had been shut down since a December 22 release of uranium hexafluoride to the

environment outside the plant. After reviewing additional improvements, the NRC staff approved the

second stage of the process (the production of uranium tetrafluoride, or UF4, called green salt) on

April 14. The approval to restart the final stage, called fluorination and distillation, allows the

company to produce the final product, uranium hexafluoride (UF6).

The NRC sent the company a Confirmatory Action Letter following the December 22 release

which stated that Honeywell would discuss with the NRC both the results of its own investigation and

proposed corrective actions prior to restarting the processes involved in the incident.

Based on NRC inspectors’ reviews of corrective actions and observation of work activities, the

agency is satisfied that the company’s actions have been adequate to allow the safe restart of all three

stages of production: ore preparation, uranium tetrafluoride (UF4) or green salt, and fluorination and

distillation leading to uranium hexafluoride (UF6).

As previously announced, the NRC has scheduled another public meeting in Metropolis for

April 21 to discuss the company’s improvement efforts, along with NRC inspections and review. The

meeting will begin at 6:00 p.m. in the large Second Floor Courtroom at the Massac County Courthouse

at 1 Superman Square. NRC officials will be available prior to the meeting’s conclusion to answer any

questions from interested local citizens.

 ###
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Perkins & Marie Callender’s Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 27, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph F. Trungale, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: March 29, 2010
By: /s/ Joseph F. Trungale


Joseph F. Trungale


President and Chief Executive Officer
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-54 May 13, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC TO DISCUSS APPARENT PACKAGING VIOLATION WITH PA. COMPANY

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

representatives of a Pennsylvania company on Wednesday, May 20,

to discuss an apparent violation of agency requirements. The

apparent infraction by Cabot Performance Materials of Boyertown,

Pa., involves a failure to ensure that packages containing

radioactive material were properly prepared for shipping.

Late last year, Cabot was shipping filtercake, a type of

manufacturing residue containing radioactive material, from its

facility in Boyertown to a uranium mill in Utah for processing.

NRC inspectors determined that while en route by train, some of

the containers began leaking because liquid had separated from

the filtercake and the containers were not designed to hold

liquid.

The predecisional enforcement conference is scheduled to

begin at 10 a.m. in the Public Meeting Room at the NRC Region I

office in King of Prussia, Pa. It will be open to the public for

observation. The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement

conference does not mean that the NRC has determined a violation

has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather,

the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and

safety significance; to provide the licensee with an opportunity

to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC

inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline its

proposed corrective action.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at

this conference. That decision will be made by NRC officials at

a later time.

#