alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §555. Conditions precedent for aid to non-Federal lands

#### (a) Enactment of local laws; agreements

As a condition to the extending of any benefits under section 553(b) of this title to any lands not owned or controlled by the United States or any of its agencies, except where such action is necessary for the protection of lands or other property owned or controlled by the United States or any of its agencies, the Secretary of the Interior may require—

(1) the enactment of State or local laws providing for the control and extinguishment of outcrop and underground fires in coal formations on State or privately owned land and the cooperation of State or local authorities in the work; and

(2) agreements or covenants as to the performance and maintenance of the work required to control or extinguish such fires.

#### (b) Contributions

The Secretary of the Interior shall require in connection with any project for the control or extinguishment of fires in any inactive coal mine on any lands not owned or controlled by the United States or any of its agencies, except where such project is necessary for the protection of lands or other property owned or controlled by the United States or any of its agencies, (1) that the State or person owning or controlling such lands contribute on a matching basis 50 per centum of the cost of planning and executing such project, or (2), if such State or person furnishes evidence satisfactory to the Secretary of the Interior of an inability to make the matching contribution herein provided for, that such State or person pay to the Government, within such period of time as the Secretary of the Interior shall determine, an amount equal to 50 per centum of the cost of planning and executing such project. At least 75 per centum of the funds expended in any fiscal year, from any appropriation available to carry out the purposes of this chapter, in connection with projects for the control or extinguishment of fires in inactive coal mines where such action is not necessary for the protection of lands or other property owned or controlled by the United States or any of its agencies, shall be expended in conformity with clause (1) of this subsection.

(Aug. 31, 1954, ch. 1156, §5, 68 Stat. 1010.)
### SUBCHAPTER III—ACQUISITION OF LAND AND MATERIALS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1830
HARRISON T. ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus W. H. HAND, JR., President, THT Enterprises, Incorporated, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-94-127-4-BO) Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 17, 1996 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harrison T. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Bradley Arthur Elliott, Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Anderson v. Hand , No. CA-94-127-4-BO (E.D.N.C. May 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### SUBCHAPTER II—TRUST FUNDS AND REFUNDS
#### Mitchell, appellant, and Marsh, respondent.

Decree unanimously affirmed, for the the reasons stated by the Vice-Chancellor in his opinion, reported in 11 *C. E. Green*498.
Exhibit
31.2




RULE
13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION FOR FORM 10-K (CFO) CERTIFICATION




I, Hu
Gang, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Yuhe International,
Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:




a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to the Company by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;




c.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




d.
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a. All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




b. Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.







Date:
      May 13, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Hu GangHu
      GangChief
      Financial Officer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHeat transfer distributions around nominal ice accretion shapes formed on a cylinder in the NASA Lewis icing research tunnelLocal heat transfer coefficients were obtained on irregular cylindrical shapes which typify the accretion of ice on circular cylinders in cross flow. The ice shapes were grown on a 5.1 cm (2.0 in.) diameter cylinder in the NASA Lewis Icing Research Tunnel. The shapes were 2, 5, and 15 min accumulations of glaze ice and 15 min accumulation of rime ice. Heat transfer coefficients were also measured around the cylinder with no ice accretion. These icing shapes were averaged axially to obtain a nominal shape of constant cross section for the heat transfer tests. Heat transfer coefficients around the perimeter of each shape were measured with electrically heated copper strips embedded in the surface of the model which was cast from polyurethane foam. Each strip contained a thermocouple to measure the local surface temperature. The models were run in a 15.2 x 68.6 cm (6 x 27 in.) wind tunnel at several velocities. Background turbulence in the wind tunnel was less than 0.5 percent. The models were also run with a turbulence producing grid which gave about 3.5 percent turbulence at the model location with the model removed. The effect of roughness was also simulated with sand grains glued to the surface. Results are presented as Nusselt number versus angle from the stagnation line for the smooth and rough models for both high and low levels of free stream turblence. Roughness of the surface in the region prior to flow separation plays a major role in determining the heat transfer distribution.Document ID19840006395Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsVanfossen, G. J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Simoneau, R. J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Olsen, W. A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Shaw, R. J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1984Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:83557E-1905NASA-TM-83557Meeting InformationMeeting: Aerospace Sci. MeetingLocation: Reno, NVCountry: United StatesStart Date: January 9, 1984End Date: January 12, 1984Sponsors:AIAAAccession Number84N14463Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-45-12Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840006395.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**CIPHER
HOLDING CORPORATION**
 
 
 EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
connection with the Amended Annual Report of Cipher Holding Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Patrick Rooney,
President and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the annual
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the annual report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:
October 17, 2005
 
 /s/
Patrick Rooney
 President,
 Chief
Executive Officer,
 Chairman
of the Board and Director
 
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

RUIZ E. ACOSTA , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 2337

[ January 18, 2024 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Caroline Cahill Shepherd, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2002

- CF

- 014604

- A XXX

- MB

.
Ruiz E. Acosta, Miami, pro se.

No response required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

W ARNER , M AY and D AMOORGIAN , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.25

                   Summary of Executive Officer Bonus Program


         Penwest Pharmaceuticals Co. ("the Company") maintains a bonus program
for its executive officers that is administered by the Compensation Committee
(the "Committee") of the Board of Directors of the Company. This program
provides for an annual cash payout dependent on achievement by both the
executive and the Company of predetermined short-term operating goals and
longer-term strategic objectives. These goals also include Company goals and
individual goals. Our President's target bonus is based 100% upon achieving
Company goals. Individual incentive compensation target awards are set annually
by the Compensation Committee. These target awards are determined by salary
grade and are subject to an adjustment based on individual performance, and
typically range from 25%-40% of the executive's salary.
#### § 361.108 Loss of electronic licensing privileges.

Should Commerce determine that a filer consistently files inaccurate licensing information or otherwise abuses the licensing system, Commerce may revoke its electronic licensing privileges without prior notice. The filer will then only be able to obtain a license directly from Commerce. Because of the additional time needed to review such forms, Commerce may require up to 10 working days to process such forms. Delays in filing caused by the removal of a filer's electronic filing privilege will not be considered a mitigating factor by CBP.
#### Jerome Kohlberg, Appellant, v. Lake-Chester Land Corporation, Respondent, and City of New Rochelle, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ. [See *post,,*p. 847.]
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

               Subsidiaries of WorldPages.com, Inc.

ACG Acquisition II Corp., a Delaware corporation
ACG Acquisition VI Corp, a Delaware corporation (as of February 23, 2000, ACG
   Acquisition VI Corp. merged with and into Web YP, Inc., a Texas corporation)
ACG Acquisition VII Corp., a Delaware corporation (as of February 23, 2000,
   ACG Acquisition VII Corp. merged with and into Big Stuff, Inc., a Texas
   corporation)
ACG Exchange Company, a corporation organized in the Province of Nova Scotia
ACG Holding Company, a corporation organized in the Province of Nova Scotia
Advanced Communications Corp., a Delaware corporation
Great Western Directories, Inc., a Texas corporation
1+ USA V Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation
<PAGE>

                                                                       EXHIBIT 2

                                                             Consent of KPMG LLP

<PAGE>
                                [KPMG LETTERHEAD]


The Board of Directors
Royal Group Technologies Limited

We consent to inclusion in the Form 40-F of the Company of our report dated
November 15, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as
at September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001 and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, retained earnings and cash flows for each of the years
ended September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001.


/s/ KPMG LLP
-------------------------------
Chartered Accountants
Toronto, Canada

February 14, 2003
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-024 February 21, 2003

NRC ANNOUNCES OPPORTUNITY FOR COMMENT 

ON SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL TRANSPORTATION TEST PROPOSALS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will conduct four public meetings: on March 6, in

Bethesda, Maryland; on March 12 and 13, in Las Vegas and Pahrump, Nevada, respectively; and on

March 19, in Rosemont, Illinois, to obtain comments on a proposal to test casks for transporting

radioactive spent fuel by rail and by truck. 

The proposal is part of the Package Performance Study (PPS) that focuses research on the

possibilities and consequences of severe transportation accidents. The proposals are described in a test

protocols report that outlines full-scale, high speed spent fuel cask impact and fire testing experiments

that NRC is considering sponsoring over the next few years. 

The March 6 workshop will be held from 8:00 a.m. until 5:30 p.m., in the NRC Two White Flint

North Auditorium at 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. 

The March 12 workshop will be held from 10:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m., at the Clark County

Building Department, Russell/Cameron Office, 4701 West Russell Road, Las Vegas, Nevada. 

The March 13 public meeting/seminar will be held from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., at the Mountain

View Casino and Bowl, 1750 South Pahrump Valley Boulevard, Pahrump, Nevada. 

The March 19 workshop will be held from 8:00 a.m. until 5:30 p.m., at the Embassy Suites

Hotel O’Hare, 5500 N. River Road, Rosemont, Illinois. 

The workshops will be conducted in a roundtable format with a limited number of invited 

participants. A facilitator will ensure participation by a broad spectrum of stakeholders, including

citizen and environmental groups, nuclear and transportation industries, academia, and governmental

representatives at the Federal, State and local level. Others are welcome to attend and will have

opportunities to comment on each agenda item to be discussed by roundtable participants. 
The test protocols report (NUREG-1768) is available for comment at the NRC’s website at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1768/ .

Additionally, copies of the report and other PPS-related documents can be found at

http://ttd.sandia.gov/nrc/modal.htm or obtained by contacting Ms. Amy Snyder by e-mail at

ams3@nrc.gov or by telephone at 301-415-8580. Written comments on the report will be accepted until

May 30, and can be submitted by e-mail or addressed to Ms. Snyder at the Spent Fuel Project Office,

Mail Stop O13-D13, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-001. 

###
No. 89-6296.

#### Fulminante *v.*Arizona.

Sup. Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied.
#### §§ 201.131-201.139 [Reserved]
; Generated by FastSum - an extremely fast checksum utility.
; Go to www.fastsum.com to get your own copy for free.
;
E9C0A8CD11ED51D90F3016911D3704A4 *OnPointII.pdf
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1368 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1368

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 8, 2003

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 7554 Pacific Avenue in Stockton, California, as the ``Norman D. 
                    Shumway Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7554 
Pacific Avenue in Stockton, California, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Norman D. Shumway Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Norman D. Shumway Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 7, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
### SUBCHAPTER II—ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS, SYSTEMS, AND INFORMATION
### §§43b, 43b–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §203(13), (14), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1726

Section 43b, Pub. L. 85–570, July 31, 1958, 72 Stat. 443; Pub. L. 86–176, Aug. 21, 1959, 73 Stat. 401; Pub. L. 88–70, July 19, 1963, 77 Stat. 82; Pub. L. 89–90, July 27, 1965, 79 Stat. 269; Pub. L. 89–147, §1, Aug. 28, 1965, 79 Stat. 583; Pub. L. 89–545, Aug. 27, 1966, 80 Stat. 358; Pub. L. 90–86, §1, Sept. 17, 1967, 81 Stat. 226; Pub. L. 91–145, Dec. 12, 1969, 83 Stat. 343; Pub. L. 92–51, July 9, 1971, 85 Stat. 128; Pub. L. 92–607, ch. V, §§502, 506(k)(2), formerly §506(h)(2), Oct. 31, 1972, 86 Stat. 1504, 1508, renumbered §506(i)(2), Pub. L. 95–391, title I, §108(a), Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 773, renumbered §506(j)(2), Pub. L. 96–304, title I, §101, July 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 889, renumbered §506(k)(2), Pub. L. 97–276, §101(e), Oct. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 1189, provided for reimbursement of House Members for additional transportation expenses.

Section 43b-1, Pub. L. 89–147, §2, Aug. 28, 1965, 79 Stat. 583; Pub. L. 90–86, §2, Sept. 17, 1967, 81 Stat. 226, authorized election by House Members of lump sum transportation payments in lieu of reimbursement of transportation expenses.
§ 1216.103 Definitions. The following definitions apply to this part. ( a ) *Demand* means an order, subpoena, or other command of a court or other competent authority for the production, disclosure, or release of records or for the appearance and testimony of an MSPB employee in a legal proceeding.
( b ) *General Counsel* means the General Counsel of the MSPB or a person to whom the General Counsel has delegated authority under this part.
( c ) *Legal proceeding* means any matter before a court of law, administrative board or tribunal, commission, administrative law judge, hearing officer or other body that conducts a legal or administrative proceeding. Legal proceeding includes all phases of litigation.
( d ) *MSPB* means the Merit Systems Protection Board.
( e ) MSPB employee or employee means: ( 1 ) ( i ) Any current or former employee of the MSPB;
( ii ) Any other individual hired through contractual agreement by or on behalf of the MSPB or who has performed or is performing services under such an agreement for the MSPB; and
( iii ) Any individual who served or is serving in any consulting or advisory capacity to the MSPB, whether formal or informal.
( 2 ) This definition does not include persons who are no longer employed by the MSPB and who agree to testify about general matters, matters available to the public, or matters with which they had no specific involvement or responsibility during their employment with the MSPB.
( f ) Records or official records and information all information in the custody and control of the MSPB, relating to information in the custody and control of the MSPB, or acquired by an MSPB employee in the performance of his or her official duties or because of his or her official status, while the individual was employee by or on behalf of the MSPB.
( g ) *Request* means any informal request, by whatever method, for the production of records and information or for testimony which has not been ordered by a court of other competent authority.
( h ) *Testimony* means any written or oral statements, including depositions, answers to interrogatories, affidavits, declarations, interviews, and statements made by an individual in connection with a legal proceeding.
### [§334. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–124, §3, Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1666]

Section, added Pub. L. 94–464, §2(b), Oct. 8, 1976, 90 Stat. 1986; amended Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §515(3), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2937, provided for the payment of malpractice liability of National Guard Medical personnel. See sections 1089(a) of Title 10, Armed Forces, and 2671 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Amendment After Repeal

Pub. L. 97–258, §3(h)(1), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1065, purported to substitute "section 1304 of title 31" for "section 1302 of the Act of July 27, 1956, (31 U.S.C. 724a)" in subsec. (a) of section 334 of this title, without reference to the earlier repeal of that section by Pub. L. 97–124, §3, Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1666.

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective only with respect to claims arising on or after Dec. 29, 1981, see section 4 of Pub. L. 97–124, set out as an Effective Date of 1981 Amendment note under section 1089 of Title 10, Armed Forces.