alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §304. United States Mint

(a) The United States Mint is a bureau in the Department of the Treasury.

(b)(1) The head of the Mint is the Director of the Mint. The Director is appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The term of the Director is 5 years. The President may remove the Director from office. On removal, the President shall send a message to the Senate giving the reasons for removal.

(2) The Director shall carry out duties and powers prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 879; Pub. L. 102–390, title II, §225(a), (b)(1), (2), Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1629.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 304(a) | 31:251(1st sentence less words after 1st comma). | R.S. §343(less 1st sentence words after 1st comma). |
| 304(b)(1) | 31:251(2d sentence words before comma, last sentence). | |
| 304(b)(2) | 31:251(2d sentence words after comma). | |

In subsection (b)(1), the word "head" is substituted for "chief officer" in 31:251 for clarity and consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The word "is" is substituted for "shall be denominated" to eliminate unnecessary words.

In subsection (b)(2), the words "The Director shall carry out duties and powers prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury" are substituted for "and shall be under the general direction of the Secretary of the Treasury" for clarity and consistency in the revised title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–390, §225(b)(2), substituted "United States Mint" for "Bureau of the Mint" in section catchline.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–390, §225(a), substituted "United States Mint" for "Bureau of the Mint".

Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 102–390, §225(b)(1), substituted "head of the Mint" for "head of the Bureau".
### §9308. Civil penalty

A surety corporation is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of at least $500 but not more than $5,000 for violating section 9304, 9305, or 9306 of this title. A civil action under this section may be brought in a judicial district in which a civil action may be brought against the corporation under section 9307 of this title. A penalty imposed under this section does not affect the validity of a contract made by the surety corporation.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1049.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9308 | 6:13. | |

The section is substituted for 6:13 for clarity and consistency.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-32072, 333-45276, 333-45284, 333-70203 and
333-73053) of King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated February 16, 2001,
except for the third paragraph of Note 1 which is as of September 19, 2001,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K/A.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Atlanta, Georgia

September 19, 2001
II 

Calendar No. 532 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1521 

[Report No. 108–276] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 16, 2003 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

MAY 20, 2004 

Reported by Mr. DOMENICI, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To provide for additional lands to be included within the 

boundary of the Johnstown Flood National Memorial 

in the State of Pennsylvania, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Johnstown Flood Na5 tional Memorial Boundary Adjustment Act of 2003’’. 
2 

•HR 1521 RS 

1 SEC. 2. BOUNDARY OF JOHNSTOWN FLOOD NATIONAL ME2 MORIAL. 

3 The boundary of the Johnstown Flood National Me4 morial (‘‘Memorial’’) is modified to include the area as 

5 generally depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Johnstown Flood 

6 National Memorial, Cambria County, Commonwealth of 

7 Pennsylvania’’, numbered N.E.R.O. 427/80,008 and dated 

8 June, 2003. The map shall be on file and available for 

9 inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park 

10 Service, Department of the Interior. 

11 SEC. 3. ACQUISITION OF LANDS. 

12 The Secretary of the Interior (‘‘Secretary’’) is author13 ized to acquire from willing sellers the land or interests 

14 in land as described in section 2 by donation, purchase 

15 with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange. 

16 SEC. 4. ADMINISTRATION OF LANDS. 

17 Lands added to the Memorial by section 2 shall be 

18 administered by the Secretary as part of the Memorial in 

19 accordance with applicable laws and regulations. 

20 SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

21 In addition to amounts otherwise made available for 

22 land acquisition, there are authorized to be appropriated 

23 such sums as may be necessary to carry out the purposes 

24 of this Act. 

Calendar No. 532 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1521 

[Report No. 108–276] 

AN ACT 

To provide for additional lands to be included withother purposes. Memorial in the State of Pennsylvania, and for in the boundary of the Johnstown Flood National 

MAY 20, 2004 

Reported without amendment
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA new day: Challenger and space flight thereafterOn January 28, 1986, at an altitude of 14 kilometers, the Space Shuttle Challenger was torn apart by an explosion of the external tank. The effects of the accident are undoubtedly far-reaching; they have broad repercussions that affect NASA's international partner organizations. The effects of the postponed shuttle flights on European space programs are discussed. A review of the German participation in the American space program is presented. The need to continue the future projects such as the space station is examined in light of its importance as a springboard for further exploration.Document ID19870007423Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsVonputtkamer, Jesco*(NASA Headquarters Washington, DC United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1986Subject CategoryAstronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA-TM-77717NAS 1.15:77717Accession Number87N16856Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASW-4005Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870007423.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Ellen H. Lachaud et al., Appellants, v. Metropolitan Opera Association, Inc., Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Townley, Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 4818] 

The Department of State Announces the Establishment of the U.S. National Commission for the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 

The U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, which will operate pursuant to the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), will provide recommendations to the Secretary of State and to the U.S. Mission to UNESCO in Paris. The primary focus of the recommendations will relate to the formulation and implementation of U.S. policy towards UNESCO on matters of education, science, communications, and culture. In its efforts to uphold and promote human rights, tolerance, and learning worldwide, the U.S. National Commission for UNESCO is necessary and in the public interest. 

                    To contact the commission, please call (202) 647-6081 or e-mail                     *DCUNESCO@state.gov.*

Dated: October 6, 2004. 

Marguerite H. Sullivan, 

Executive Director, International Organizations/U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 04-24329 Filed 10-29-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-19-P
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 5462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2442]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2003-16500; Airspace Docket No. 03-ACE-84]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Oskaloosa, IA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Oskaloosa, IA.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, April 15, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone 
(816) 329-2525.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on December 2, 2003 
(68 FR 67358). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such adverse comment, 
were received with the comment period, the regulation would become 
effective on April 15, 2004. No adverse comments were received and thus 
this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective 
on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO, on January 21, 2004.
Paul J. Sheridan,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 04-2442 Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ASECO
CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 29, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1996
<CASH>                                          14,545
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,053
<ALLOWANCES>                                       575
<INVENTORY>                                      8,871
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,970
<PP&E>                                           4,634
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,534
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,716
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            36
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,456
<SALES>                                          8,989
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,989
<CGS>                                            4,805
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,805
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (2)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    811
<INCOME-TAX>                                       273
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                538
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       538
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
### §§143 to 143b. Repealed. Pub. L. 88–131, §3, Sept. 24, 1963, 77 Stat. 194

Section 143, act Oct. 11, 1951, ch. 495, §1, 65 Stat. 406, related to adoption of rules for prevention of collisions on the high seas, and to their geographical applicability.

Section 143a, act Oct. 11, 1951, ch. 495, §2, 65 Stat. 407, provided that Navy and Coast Guard be exempt from the requirements of the rules.

Section 143b, act Oct. 11, 1951, ch. 495, §6, 65 Stat. 408, related to identity of regulations authorized to be proclaimed.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Sept. 1, 1965, see Proc. No. 3632, Dec. 29, 1964, 29 F.R. 19167, and section 3 of Pub. L. 88–131, both set out as notes under section 1051 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Proclamation No. 3030

Proc. No. 3030, Aug. 19, 1953, 18 F.R. 4983, which was the enabling proclamation for adopting Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1948, under act Oct. 11, 1951, ch. 495, §1, 65 Stat. 406, was superseded by Proc. No. 3632, Dec. 29, 1964, 29 F.R. 19167, set out as a note under former section 1051 of this title.

#### Executive Order No. 10402

Ex. Ord. No. 10402, Oct. 30, 1952, 17 F.R. 9917, which enforced the Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1948, was revoked by Ex. Ord. No. 12234, Sept. 3, 1980, 45 F.R. 58801, set out as a note under section 1602 of this title.
### §§226a, 226b. Repealed. Aug. 8, 1946, ch. 916, §14, 60 Stat. 958

Section 226a, act July 8, 1940, ch. 548, 54 Stat. 742, related to lease of lands not within known productive field. See section 226 of this title.

Section 226b, acts July 29, 1942, ch. 534, §1, 56 Stat. 726; Dec. 22, 1943, ch. 376, 57 Stat. 608; Sept. 27, 1944, ch. 429, 58 Stat. 755; Nov. 30, 1945, ch. 495, 59 Stat. 587, related to preference right to new oil and gas lease upon expiration of five-year non-competitive oil and gas lease. See section 226 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

See note set out under section 181 of this title.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-048 April 26, 2004

NRC AMENDS LICENSING, INSPECTION AND ANNUAL FEES RULE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is amending its regulations for the licensing, inspection

and annual fees it charges applicants and licensees for Fiscal Year (FY) 2004.

The agency is required to collect nearly all of its annual appropriated budget through two types

of fees. One is for specific NRC services, such as licensing and inspection activities, that apply to a

specific license. The other is an annual fee paid by all licensees, which recovers generic regulatory

expenses and other costs not recovered through fees for specific services. These fees are contained in

Commission regulations 10 CFR Part 170 (fees for licensing and inspection services) and 10 CFR Part

171 (annual fees). 

By law, the NRC must recover $545.3 million, which represents 92 percent of its budget for

FY 2004 (October 1, 2003 - September 30, 2004) less the $32.9 million appropriated from the Nuclear

Waste Fund for high-level waste activities. The amount to be recovered in FY 2004 includes $51.1

million appropriated for NRC’s activities related to homeland security. The total amount to be

recovered is about $19 million more than last year, which will fund increases in resources for

homeland security activities, operating reactor license renewals and new reactor licensing. 

The annual fees have been determined under the “re-baselining” method. The Commission

decided to re-baseline annual fees this year based on the changes in the total budget and the magnitude

of the budget allocated to certain classes of licensees. Re-baselined annual fees will result in increased

annual fees compared to FY 2003 fees for three classes of licensees (power reactors, rare earth mills

and transportation) and decreased annual fees for three classes (spent fuel storage/reactor

decommissioning, non-power reactors, and fuel facilities).

Finally, in two classes, material users and uranium recovery, annual fees for most categories of

licensees will decrease.

The FY 2004 annual fees include the following representative classes/categories of licensees:

Class/Category of Licensees FY 2004 Annual Fee

Power Reactors $3,283,000 
(Including spent fuel storage/reactor

decommissioning annual fee) 

Rare Earth Mills $157,600

Transportation-Approvals $91,300

(Users and Fabricators)

Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning $203,000

Non-Power Reactors $62,500

High-enriched Uranium Fuel Facility $4,573,000 

Low-enriched Uranium Fuel Facility $1,533,000 

Uranium Recovery (Conventional Mills) $14,500

Radiographers $11,900 

Broad Scope Medical $25,000

Distribution of Radiopharmaceuticals $4,500

Certain Gauge Users $2,500

The final rule was published in the Federal Register today, April 26. The proposed rule was

published February 2, with a request for public comment. The agency received 14 comments, which

are summarized, along with the agency’s responses, in the final rule Federal Register notice.

###
§ 191.122 Procedure. ( a ) *General.* Other provisions of this part relating to direct identification manufacturing drawback shall apply to claims for drawback under this subpart insofar as applicable to and not inconsistent with the provisions of this subpart.
( b ) *Customs form.* The forms used for other drawback claims shall be used and modified to show that the claim is being made for refund of duties paid on salt used in curing meats.
#### Nathan E. DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Appellee.

No. 01-4017.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 2002.

Decided May 28, 2002.

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Nathan E. Douglas appeals the district court’s * dismissal of Douglas’s action seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits. An administrative law judge decided that an earlier determination could not be reopened because it was issued more than four years ago, and res judicata barred consideration of the present application. The district court dismissed Douglas’s action because 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) does not allow judicial review of decisions to dismiss claims based on res judicata.

After de novo review, *see Boock v. Shalala,*48 F.3d 348, 351 & n. 2 (8th Cir.1995), we agree with the district court. We have recognized only two exceptions to the general rule prohibiting judicial review of decisions denying applications on the basis of res judicata. *See Yeazel v. Apfel,*148 F.3d 910, 911-12 (8th Cir.1998). We conclude neither exception applies here. First, we do not believe the Commissioner reopened the earlier determination as a matter of administrative discretion. *See*20 C.F.R. §§ 404.988(b)-(c), 416.1488(c) (2001); *Burks-Marshall v. Shalala,*7 F.3d 1346, 1348 & n. 6 (8th Cir.1993). Second, we conclude Douglas has not presented a colorable constitutional claim related to either his alleged mental impairment, *see Boock,*48 F.3d at 352, or the lack of a hearing concerning the earlier determination, *see Yeazel,*148. F.3d at 912.

*296We affirm the judgment of the district court. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

*

 The Honorable J. Thomas Ray, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).