alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-00-25 May 23, 2000

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH SOUTHERN NUCLEAR JUNE 1

TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATION AT FARLEY PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a predecisional enforcement conference

with officials of Southern Nuclear Operating Company in Atlanta on Thursday, June 1, at 9:30 a.m.

(EDT) to discuss regulatory safety questions the agency has concerning the Unit 2 service water system

at the two-unit Farley nuclear power plant, located near Columbia, Alabama.

The meeting will be held in the NRC offices located on the 24th floor of the Sam Nunn Federal

Center, 61 Forsyth Street, SW. It will be open to observation by interested members of the public and

news media representatives. NRC officials will be available at its conclusion to answer questions.

NRC officials said the conference is being held to discuss an apparent violation involving a

booster pump that provides lubrication and cooling to the Unit 2 service water system. In February, a

plant operator noticed that a diesel generator had been taken out of service on one part of the service

water system while a booster pump was out of service on a redundant part of the system, meaning that

the system may not have been able to perform its intended function if needed during that time. The

service water system provides cooling for safety-related pieces of equipment.

NRC officials said the company had previous opportunities to identify and prevent the problem

after an NRC inspection in 1993 and again after a senior reactor operator informally brought the issue

to the attention of engineering personnel in 1998.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that a

determination has been made that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken.

The purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance, to provide the

licensee with an opportunity to point out errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report

and to enable the company to outline its proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action, such as a civil

penalty, will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a later time.

#
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Effects of Alloy Chemistry, Cold Work, and Water Chemistry on Corrosion Fatigue and Stress Corrosion Cracking of Nickel Alloys and Welds (NUREG/CR-6721, ANL-01/07)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6721 (PDF - 461 KB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**March 2001**Date Published:**March 2001

**Prepared by:** O.K. Chopra, W.K. Soppet, and W.J. Shack

 Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439

M.B. McNeil, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:**Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ****Washington, DC 20555-0001

 NRC Job Code W6610

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Reactor vessel internal components made of nickel-base alloys are susceptible to environmentally assisted cracking (EAC). A better understanding of the causes and mechanisms of this cracking may permit less conservative estimates of damage accumulation and requirements on inspection intervals. The objective of this work is to evaluate and compare the resistance of Alloys 600 and 690 and their welds, such as Alloys 82, 182, 52, and 152, to EAC in simulated light water reactor environments. The existing crack growth rate (CGR) data for these alloys under cyclic and constant loads have been evaluated to establish the effects of alloy chemistry, cold work, and water chemistry. The experimental fatigue CGRs are compared with CGRs that would be expected in air under the same mechanical loading conditions to obtain a qualitative understanding of the degree and range of conditions for significant environmental enhancement in growth rates. The existing stress corrosion cracking (SCC) data on Alloys 600 and 690 and Alloy 82, 182, and 52 welds have been compiled and analyzed to determine the influence of key parameters on growth rates in simulated PWR and BWR environments. The SCC data for these alloys have been evaluated with correlations developed by Scott and by Ford and Andresen.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
### **CHAPTER 2—INTERNATIONAL RULES FOR NAVIGATION AT SEA**
#### § 2.4 Probationary period.

Persons selected from registers of eligibles for career or career-conditional appointment and employees promoted, transferred, or otherwise assigned, for the first time, to supervisory or managerial positions shall be required to serve a probationary period under terms and conditions prescribed by the Office.

[45 FR 4337, Jan. 22, 1980]
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-53903) of Spectra-Physics Lasers, Inc. of our
report dated January 22, 1999 relating to the financial statements, which
appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation
by reference of our report dated January 22, 1999 relating to the financial
statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, CA
March 23, 2000
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 E0 03 3 . W OODRUFF v . W OODRUFF.

Th e Geo rg i a Su p rem e Co u r t t r a ns ferred t o t h i s Co u rt Mi ch ael W o o d ru ff’ s

m o ti o n an d am en d ed m o t io n fo r an ex t en s i on o f t i m e t o fi l e an ap p eal

. Th e m o t i on s h av in g b een read an d co n si d ered , t h ey are h ereb y

DENIED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 

## January 31, 2017

01/31/2017
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### §§ 10.92-10.97 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                          5


<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                      JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                       75
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             75
<PP&E>                                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         0
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                   4050
<OTHER-SE>                                                (3885)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                165
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              0
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           2250
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (2,250)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (2,250)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (2,250)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0



</TABLE>
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002



I, Boguslaw Kulakowski, the chief executive officer of Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa Sp. z o.o., certify that to the best of my knowledge (i) the Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa Sp. 
z o.o.





_________________________

Name: Boguslaw Kulakowski

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date:

| | > 1 "- # -" | 
| | ----------- | 





Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002



I, Jonathan Eastick, the chief financial officer of Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa Sp. z o.o., certify that to the best of my knowledge (i) the Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa Sp. 
z o.o.





_________________________

Name: Jonathan Eastick

Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date:

| |  | 
| |  |
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 03-129 October 6, 2003

 NRC DENIES PETITION TO REFERENCE PRIOR LICENSING INFORMATION 

 IN NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANT APPLICATIONS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has denied a petition for rulemaking submitted by

the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) in July 2001. The petition requested that the NRC amend its rules

to allow applicants seeking an early site permit and a combined construction and operating license for a

nuclear power plant to use existing information from prior licensing actions as information that has

been approved by the agency. 

In denying the petition for rulemaking to amend Title 10 of The Code of Federal Regulations,

Part 52, the NRC said most of the efficiencies, regulatory stability and predictability that comprise the

petitioner’s proposal can be achieved under existing regulations, as well as the guidance it has directed

the NRC staff to prepare.

In its ruling, the agency said that, to the extent practicable, it expects applicants for early site

permits and combined licenses to rely on previously filed siting and programmatic information. 

However, it added, that there are limitations to using previously filed information and treating it as

resolved. Specifically, the NRC recognized the need for applicants to demonstrate that the information

is technically applicable to the prospective licensing action. In addition, the Commission stated that

there are insufficient legal bases to support the petitioner’s rulemaking proposal. 

Copies of the petition for rulemaking, the public comments received and the NRC’s denial to

the petitioner are available for public inspection, or copying for a fee, at the NRC’s Public Document

Room, located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. 

These documents are also available on the agency’s rulemaking web site at http://ruleforum.llnl.gov .

###
### §299. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(2) [title I, §102(a)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–100

Section, Pub. L. 88–652, §10, Oct. 13, 1964, 78 Stat. 1083, related to compensation level of individual appointed to position subject to House Employees Schedule or House Wage Schedule.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(2) [title I, §102(b)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–100, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [repealing this section] shall apply with respect to employees appointed on or after October 1, 2000."
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 16 72

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Ja m es Ch arl es Fu dg e
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Gran t Harris , Form er Warde n, ADC, As si st an t Dep ut y Dire ct or ; M os es Jac ks on , Dep ut y Ass is tantW ard en , Varn er Supe rm ax , ADC; J am es Ban ks , W ard en , ADC; Ran da ll W at so n, Warde n, Varne r Supe rm ax , ADC; Cu rti s M ei nz er, Fo rm er ADC Dep ut y Ass is ta ntW ard en ; J am es Ch an ey , Secu rit y Offic ia l, Varn er Supe rm ax , ADC; C . Pas ke ll , Secu rit y Offic ia l, Varn er Supe rm ax , ADC; J us ti ne M. Mi no r, Mrs ., Disc ip li na ry

Heari ng Offic ia l; Keith Wadd le , Mr., Dis ci pl in ary Heari ng Offi ci al ; St ep he n Wats on , Secu rit y Offic ia l, Varn er Supe rm ax ; J effr ey Andrews , Secu rit y Offic ia l, Varn er Supe rm ax
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Eas te rnDis tri ctof Ark an sa s - P in e Bl uf f

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Decem

be r 7, 2 01 6 Fi le d: Decem

be r 9, 2 01 6 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re COLLOTON, MURPHY, andGRUENDER, Circu itJu dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.Ark an sa s in m at e Ja m es Fu dg e ap pe al s th e di st ric t co u rt’s ad ve rs e gr an t of 1

su m m ary jud gm en t on hi s du e pr oc es s cl ai m rel at ed to hi s o n g o i n g se gr eg at ed

co nf in em en t. Afte r care fu ll y rev ie win g th e reco rd a n d t h e pa rti es ’ arg um en ts on ap pe al , we co nc lu de th at th e di st ric t co urt’s de ci si on was pr op er. Se e Bea ul ie u v. Lu de man , 69 0 F.3 d 10 17 , 10 24 (8 th Ci r. 20 12 ) (g ran t of su m m ary jud gm en t rev ie wed de no vo ); Rah man X v. Mor ga n , 30 0 F.3 d 97 0, 97 3- 74 (8 th Ci r. 20 02 ) (d is cu ss in g du e pr oc es s requi rem en ts rel at ed to on go in g co nf in em en t in ad m in is tra ti ve se gr eg at io n)

. Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm

. Se e 8t h C ir. R . 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le J. Leo n Ho lm es , Uni te d S ta te s Dist ric t Ju dg e fo r th e Eas te rn 1 Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s, ad op ti ng th e pr op os ed fin di ng s an d r e c omm en da ti on s of th e Hon or ab le Je ro m e T. Kearn ey , Uni te d St at es Mag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e E as te rn D is tri ct of Arka ns as

. -2

-
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2013 - 1068 Director ate Identifier: 2013NM196AD

84 - 36 - 04, RA --- 4/17/13 84 - 36 - 04 --- 3/13/13 MODSUM 4Q110595, RC --- 5/14/13

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
EXHIBIT 4.12



ESBI Alberta Ltd.

900, 736 - 8 Avenue 5V':

Calgary. AB T2P1H4

Phone: ('10:1) 232-0944

Fax: (403) 266-2959

January 14,2000

Autumn Industries Inc.

1004 - 1708 Dolphin Avenue

Kelowna, BC VIY 9S4



ATTN: Nick Colvin



Re: System Access Service Authorization under Rate GPA

Willesden Green Power Project

(LSD 6-24-41-6-W5)

Dear Nick:

System Access Service Authorization under Rate GPA

ESBI Alberta Ltd. is pleased to provide Autumn Industries Inc. with System Access Authorization under Rate GPA for 1.0 MW at the "Willesden Green Power Project" Point of Supply effective January 1, 2000. Pending development of suitable service agreements this letter shall serve as acknowledgement of Autumn Industries Inc. generator meeting the requirements of the Transmission Administrator (TA). The generator will be taking service under Rate GPA and will be subject to the related terms and conditions of service under the TA's Tariff as amended from time to time by the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board.

Capital Contribution 

ESBI Alberta Ltd. has determined that there are no incremental transmission system capital costs associated with providing service to the API Grain Processors generator and as a result, a capital contribution under the Tariff is not required.

Local Facilities Charge

ESBI Alberta Ltd. has determined that there are no incremental transmission system 0&M costs associated with providing service to the Willesden Green generator with the exception of metering and measurement services which we understand will be provided by the Autumn Industries Inc. as measurement services provider. ESBI Alberta Ltd. is currently refining cost allocation processes and cost collection responsibilities. The costs associated with measurement may become a charge by the measurement services provider to ESBI Alberta Ltd. and recovered by ESBI Alberta Ltd. from API Grain Processors under Rate GPA. We will keep you apprised of how these costs are to be recovered.

Incremental Loss Factors (Rate GPA Transmission Losses Charge/Credit)

ESBI Alberta Ltd. has been preparing and revising incremental loss factors on a seasonal basis initially and may move to longer periods in the future. Based on models in use at the time for the current settlement period with existing rate GPA customers, the loss factors for this area (for IMW Generation) would be -9.33% for on-peak hours (0700-2100) and -7.59% for off-peak hours (2100-0700). 

Creditworthiness 

ESBI Alberta Ltd. requires that all Rate GPA Customers maintain creditworthiness, on the eventuality that a credit loss factor can evolve into a charge, should system conditions change. We are currently evaluating minimum requirements and as such will advise you if proof of creditworthiness, as outlined in our terms and conditions, is required. 

Power Pool of Alberta 

By copy of this letter to the Power Pool of Alberta, Autumn Industries Inc. may proceed with applying for Power Pool membership.

Please contact myself at (403) 716-4446 if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

ESBI Alberta Ltd.



John Luders

Coordinator, Customer Accounts

jl/JCL

cc: K. Mazuryk - Power Pool of Alberta
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5461-5462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2441]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2003-16763; Airspace Docket No. 03-ACE-100]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Springfield, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; request for comments; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects a direct final rule; request for comments 
that was published in the Federal Register on Thursday, January 15, 
2004, (69 FR 2296) [FR Doc. 04-917]. It extends the comment period by 
thirty days.

DATES: This direct final rule is effective on 0901 UTC, April 15, 2004.

[[Page 5462]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2524.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    Federal Register Document 04-917, published on Thursday, January 
15, 2004, (69 FR 2996) modified Class E3 and Class E5 airspace areas at 
Springfield, MO. The modification enlarged the controlled airspace area 
around Springfield-Branson Regional Airport to provide proper 
protection of diverse departures, corrected discrepancies in the 
Springfield-Branson Regional Airport airport reference point, redefined 
the location of the Springfield collocated very high frequency omni-
directional radio range and tactical air navigational aid (VORTAC) and 
brought the legal descriptions of Springfield, MO, Class E airspace 
areas into compliance with FAA Order 7400.2E, Procedures for Handling 
Airspace Matters. However, the published comment period closing date 
did not provide sufficient time for public response.
    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the 
response date to the Springfield, MO, Class E airspace areas, as 
published in the Federal Register on Thursday, January 15, 2004, (69 FR 
2996) [FR Doc. 04-917] is corrected as follows:
    On page 2296, Column 2, paragraph headed DATES, fourth line, change 
``January 27'' to read ``February 27.''

    Issued in Kansas City, MO, on January 21, 2004.
Paul J. Sheridan,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 04-2441 Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

A pril 28 , 2021

t0427 

# Order

Clerk April 28 , 2021

162887 & (116)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 162887

COA: 354927

Wayne CC: 20

- 002814

- FC

REGINALD LAMARR DAVIS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

The application for leave to appeal the April 16, 2021 order of the Court of Appeals is

considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we

VACATE the April 16, 2021 order staying the effect of the Wayne Circuit C ourt’s order

granting pretrial release to the appellant pending the resolution o f the appellee’s appeal of

that order. MCR 6.106(H)(1) states that “[t]he reviewing court may not stay, vacate,

modify, or reverse the release decision except on finding an abuse of discretion.” The

April 16, 2021 stay order did not find that the trial co urt abused its discretion. And in the

Court of Appeals April 22, 2021 judgment affirming the trial court, it expressly held that

the trial court did not abuse its discretion by granting the appellant’s motion for pretrial

release. Accordingly, MCR 6.106( H)(1) precludes the Court of Appeals from staying the

effect of the trial court’s release decision.

We do not retain jurisdiction.