Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 2, 2004 / Notices 63551

Respondents Annual

responses 

Total

responses Burden per Totalburden hours 

Revitalization Application, including 52860–A, 52800, 

52825–A, 52799, 52797, 52785, 52787 .......................... 80 1 80 190 15,200

Demolition Application, including 52790, 52780 .................. 34 1 34 40 1,360

Main Street Application, including 52861 ............................ 50 1 50 50 2,500

On-line Quarterly Reporting ................................................. 190 4 760 20 15,200

52825–A Budget updating ................................................... 190 2 380 3 1,140

52798 Supportive Srvcs Workplan ...................................... 25 1 25 15 375

52774 Relocation Plan Guide .............................................. 25 1 25 15 375

53001–A Cost Certificate ..................................................... 38 1 38 2 76

Total Burden ................................................................. ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 36,226

Status of the Proposed Information 

Collection: Removal of HOPE VI 

Neighborhood Networks Notice of 

Funds Availability (NOFA) and related 

forms. Addition of HOPE VI Main Street 

NOFA and related form. 

Authority: Section 3506 of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 

U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended.

Dated: October 27, 2004. 

Paula O. Blunt, 

General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public 

and Indian Housing.

[FR Doc. E4–2981 Filed 11–1–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–33–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

[Docket No. FR–4889–N–02] 

Change in Effective Date in Notice for 

Designation of DifficultDevelopment 

Areas Under Section 42 of the Internal 

Revenue Code of 1986

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This document amends a 

notice that designates 2004 Difficult 

Development Areas (the 2004 notice), by 

extending 2003 eligibility for areas that 

were designated as 2003 Difficult 

Development Areas in a notice 

published in 2002 (the 2003 notice), but 

were not so designated in the 2004 

notice. The amendment is necessary 

because publication of the 2004 notice 

only two weeks prior to its effective date 

did not provide adequate notice to 

affected entities. This notice (1) changes 

the definition of effective date to relate 

it to the filing date of an application for 

Low-Income Housing Tax Credits or taxexempt bond financing, (2) extends the 

effective date for areas designated as 

Difficult Development Areas in the 2003 

notice that were not Difficult 

Development Areas in the 2004 notice, 

and (3) changes the definition of 

effective date for the Difficult 

Development Areas and Qualified 

Census Tracts in the 2004 notice to 

relate it to the filing date of an 

application for Low-Income Housing 

Tax Credits or tax-exempt bond 

financing, but does not change the dates 

themselves.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

With questions related narrowly to the 

issue of the effective dates in this notice, 

Kurt G. Usowski, Associate Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Economic 

Affairs, Office of Policy Development 

and Research, 451 Seventh Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20410–6000, telephone 

(202) 708–2770, or e-mail 

Kurt_G._Usowski@hud.gov. With 

questions on how areas are designated 

and on geographic definitions, Alastair 

McFarlane, Senior Economist, Economic 

Development and Public Finance 

Division, Office of Policy Development 

and Research, Department of Housing 

and Urban Development, 451 Seventh 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410–

6000, telephone (202) 708–0426, e-mail 

Alastair_McFarlane@hud.gov. A text 

telephone is available for persons with 

hearing or speech impairments at (202) 

708–9300. (These are not toll-free 

telephone numbers.) Additional copies 

of this notice are available through 

HUDUSER at (800) 260–2691 for a small 

fee to cover duplication and mailing 

costs. 

Copies Available Electronically: This 

notice is available electronically on the 

Internet (World Wide Web) at http://

www.huduser.org/datasets/qct.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background 

On December 19, 2003, HUD 

published the 2004 notice in the 

Federal Register designating Difficult 

Development Areas and Qualified 

Census Tracts for calendar year 2004. 

The 2004 notice provides that the lists 

of Difficult Development Areas are 

effective if the credits are allocated after 

December 31, 2003; and, in the case of 

a building described in section 

42(h)(4)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code 

(Code), the lists are effective if the 

bonds are issued and the building is 

placed in service after December 31, 

2003. 

Section 42(d)(5)(C) of the Code 

defines a Difficult Development Area as 

any area designated by the Secretary of 

HUD as an area that has high 

construction, land, and utility costs 

relative to the area median gross 

income. All designated Difficult 

Development Areas in metropolitan 

statistical areas (MSAs) may not contain 

more than 20 percent of the aggregate 

population of all MSAs, and all 

designated areas not in MSAs 

(nonmetropolitan areas) may not 

contain more than 20 percent of the 

aggregate population of all 

nonmetropolitan areas. In the case of 

buildings located in Difficult 

Development Areas, eligible basis can 

be increased by as much as 130 percent 

of what it would otherwise be. This 

means that the available Low-Income 

Housing Tax Credits also can be 

increased by as much as 30 percent. 

HUD typically issues a notice in the 

Federal Register in the last quarter of a 

calendar year designating Difficult 

Development Areas for the forthcoming 

calendar year. HUD uses a ranking 

procedure to select Difficult 

Development Areas, subject to the 20 

percent population cap. Because income 

and housing cost conditions change, 

new areas are added to the lists of 

designated Difficult Development Areas 

each year and some old areas are 

dropped from the lists. The 2004 lists 

published on December 19, 2003, do not 

include 10 metropolitan areas and 68 

nonmetropolitan areas on the 2003 lists 

of Difficult Development Areas and 

include 3 metropolitan areas and 47 

nonmetropolitan areas not on the 2003 

lists of Difficult Development Areas. 

Determination 

HUD recognizes that, with every new 

designation of Difficult Development 

Areas, some metropolitan areas and 

nonmetropolitan areas lose their 

designation and rental projects planned 

in these areas lose their eligibility for 

63552 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 2, 2004 / Notices 

the extra credits. Nevertheless, HUD 

believes that the Department should 

update the lists of designated areas as 

new data become available. 

Low-Income Housing Tax Creditallocating agencies and rental project 

developers have adjusted to a system in 

which the future availability of the extra 

credits is uncertain. Generally, for any 

rental project that a credit-allocating 

agency believes is crucial to meeting the 

housing needs of the area and for which 

the extra credits are essential for 

economic feasibility, the creditallocating agency ensures that all the 

steps necessary to qualify are 

accomplished before a new designation 

list becomes effective. HUD attempts to 

publish the designation notice early 

enough to allow credit-allocating 

agencies to accomplish the necessary 

steps. HUD did not publish the 2004 

notice until December 19, 2003, which 

did not provide adequate time before 

the effective date for allocating agencies 

or applicants for tax credits or taxexempt bond financing to take actions to 

meet the conditions necessary to 

capture the benefits of the 2003 Difficult 

Development Area designations before 

they expired.

In addition, the practice of tying the 

effective date of Difficult Development 

Areas and Qualified Census Tracts to 

the allocation date, without regard to 

the application date, creates a potential 

disruption to the financing and 

development plans for buildings to be 

constructed or rehabilitated in areas that 

lose Difficult Development Area or 

Qualified Census Tract designations 

after credits (or tax-exempt bond 

financing) are applied for and before the 

allocations of credits are made (or the 

bonds are issued and the building is 

placed in service). HUD seeks to reduce 

the uncertainty and ease the transition 

associated with the changes in Difficult 

Development Area and Qualified 

Census Tract designations for allocating 

agencies and affordable housing 

developers while ensuring that the 

additional resources governed by these 

designations are directed to the areas 

where the need is greatest. 

HUD has determined that reasonable 

accommodation should be made to 

allow the Difficult Development Area 

and Qualified Census Tract features of 

the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit to 

work effectively. Because the late 

publication of the 2004 notice impeded 

the effectiveness of the Difficult 

Development Area feature of the LowIncome Housing Tax Credit, HUD is 

amending the effective date published 

in the 2004 notice. Because tying the 

effective date of Difficult Development 

Areas and Qualified Census Tracts to 

the allocation of credits (or the issuance 

of tax-exempt bonds and placement in 

service) without regard to the 

application date for these Federal 

subsidies increases uncertainty in the 

development and financing process of 

affordable rental housing in areas that 

lose Difficult Development Area or 

Qualified Census Tract designations, 

HUD is revising the definition of 

effective date published in the 2004 

notice. 

This amendment provides that, in the 

case of a building to be constructed or 

rehabilitated, that is located in a 

Difficult Development Area designated 

in the 2003 notice that is not designated 

in the 2004 notice, the 2003 lists of 

Difficult Development Areas remain in 

effect (1) for allocations of credit to an 

applicant within the 365-day period 

after the submission to the creditallocating agency of a complete 

application that was filed after 

December 31, 2002, and before 

December 17, 2004, or (2) for purposes 

of section 42(h)(4)(B) of the Code, for 

bonds issued or buildings placed in 

service within the 365-day period after 

the submission to the bond-issuing 

agency of a complete application that 

was filed after December 31, 2002, and 

before December 17, 2004, provided that 

both the issuance of the bonds and the 

placement in service of the building 

occur after the application is submitted. 

An application is deemed to be 

submitted on the date it is filed if the 

application is determined to be 

complete as certified in writing by the 

credit-allocating agency or the bondissuing agency. A ‘‘complete 

application’’ means that no more than 

de minimis clarifications of the 

application are required for the agency 

to make a decision about the allocation 

of tax credit or issuance of bonds 

covered by the application. 

This amendment will extend Difficult 

Development Area designations in the 

2003 notice for buildings to be 

constructed or rehabilitated that are 

located in Difficult Development Areas 

in the 2003 notice and that are not 

located in Difficult Development Areas 

in the 2004 notice. Thus, a building to 

be constructed or rehabilitated that is 

located in a Difficult Development Area 

designated in the 2003 notice that is not 

designated in the 2004 notice would be 

deemed to be located in a Difficult 

Development Area if a complete 

application for a tax credit allocation 

was filed, as certified in writing by the 

allocating agency, after December 31, 

2002, and before December 17, 2004, 

and credits were allocated to the 

building within the 365-day period after 

the application filing date. Similarly, a 

building described in section 42(h)(4)(B) 

of the Code that was located in a 

Difficult Development Area designated 

in the 2003 notice that was not 

designated in the 2004 notice would be 

deemed to be located in a Difficult 

Development Area if a complete 

application for tax-exempt bond 

financing was filed, as certified in 

writing by the bond-issuing agency, 

after December 31, 2002, and before 

December 17, 2004, and the building 

was placed in service or the bonds were 

issued within the 365-day period after 

the application filing date, provided that 

the issuance of the bonds and the 

placement in service of the building 

occur after the application is filed. That 

is, the applicant submitting an 

application during the prescribed time 

frame has up to 365 days after the 

application date either to place the 

project in service or to issue bonds to be 

eligible for the increase in basis 

accorded to projects located in 2003 

Difficult Development Areas. The 

applicant is ineligible for the increase in 

basis if the building was placed in 

service before the application date, or if 

the application was submitted before 

the area was a Difficult Development 

Area. 

This amendment also revises the 

language defining the effective date for 

2004 Difficult Development Areas and 

Qualified Census Tracts designated in 

the 2004 notice to base the effective date 

on the filing of a complete application 

for tax credit or tax-exempt bond 

financing. The revision of the effective 

date definition will reduce uncertainty 

for developers of affordable rental 

housing that rely on the additional 

subsidies available in Difficult 

Development Areas and Qualified 

Census Tracts by effectively allowing 

them to lock in the availability of 

additional subsidy based on application 

date and provide a smoother transition 

to subsequent Difficult Development 

Area and Qualified Census Tract 

designations.

This amendment, therefore, provides 

that the 2004 lists of Difficult 

Development Areas and Qualified 

Census Tracts (including Qualified 

Census Tracts designated in notices FR–

4799–N–01 and designated by reference 

in FR–4889–N–01) are effective (1) for 

allocations of credit after December 31, 

2003; or (2) for purposes of section 

42(h)(4)(B) of the Code, if the bonds are 

issued and the building is placed in 

service after December 31, 2003. If an 

area or census tract is not on subsequent 

lists of Difficult Development Areas or 

Qualified Census Tracts, the 2004 lists 

remain effective for the area or tract if 

(1) the allocation of credit to an 

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 2, 2004 / Notices 63553

applicant is made no later than the end 

of the 365-day period after the 

submission to the credit-allocating 

agency of a complete application filed 

before the effective date of the 

subsequent lists of Difficult 

Development Areas and Qualified 

Census Tracts; or (2) for purposes of 

section 42(h)(4)(B) of the Code, the 

bonds are issued or the building is 

placed in service no later than the end 

of the 365-day period after the 

submission to the bond-issuing agency 

of a complete application filed before 

the effective date of the subsequent lists 

of Difficult Development Areas and 

Qualified Census Tracts, provided that 

both the issuance of the bonds and the 

placement in service of the building 

occur after the application is submitted. 

That is, the applicant submitting an 

application during 2004 has up to 365 

days after the application date either to 

place the project in service or to issue 

bonds to be eligible for the increase in 

basis accorded to projects located in 

2004 Difficult Development Areas and 

Qualified Census Tracts that are not so 

designated in, for example, 2005. The 

applicant is ineligible for the increase in 

basis if the building was placed in 

service before the application date, or if 

the application was submitted before 

the area was a Difficult Development 

Area or the tract was a Qualified Census 

Tract. 

An application is deemed to be 

submitted on the date it is filed if the 

application is determined to be 

complete as certified in writing by the 

credit-allocating agency or bond-issuing 

agency. A ‘‘complete application’’

means that no more than de minimis

clarifications of the application are 

required for the agency to make a 

decision about the allocation of tax 

credits or issuance of bonds covered by 

the application. 

The effect of this amendment will be 

to allow developers of affordable rental 

housing in Difficult Development Areas 

and Qualified Census Tracts for 2004 

that will not be so designated in, for 

example, 2005 to submit applications 

prior to the expiration of the 2004 

designations and be eligible for the 

associated increase in basis so long as 

credits are allocated (or for section 

42(h)(4)(B) buildings, the bonds are 

issued or the building placed in service) 

within the 365-day period after the 

filing of a complete application as 

certified in writing by the creditallocating agency or bond-issuing 

agency. 

Effective Date 

2003 Difficult Development Areas That 

Are Not 2004 Difficult Development 

Areas 

In the case of Difficult Development 

Areas designated in the 2003 notice, but 

not designated in the 2004 notice, these 

Difficult Development Areas are 

effective (1) for allocations of credit to 

an applicant within the 365-day period 

after the submission to the creditallocating agency of a complete 

application by the applicant that was 

submitted after December 31, 2002, and 

before December 17, 2004; or (2) for 

purposes of section 42(h)(4)(B) of the 

Code, for bonds issued or buildings 

placed in service within the 365-day 

period after the submission to the bondissuing agency of a complete application 

by the applicant that was submitted 

after December 31, 2002, and before 

December 17, 2004, provided that both 

the issuance of the bonds and the 

placement in service of the building 

occur after the application is submitted. 

An application is deemed to be 

submitted on the date it is filed if the 

application is determined to be 

complete as certified in writing by the 

credit-allocating agency or bond-issuing 

agency. A ‘‘complete application’’

means that no more than de minimis

clarifications of the application are 

required for the agency to make a 

decision about the allocation of tax 

credits or issuance of bonds covered by 

the application. 

2004 Difficult Development Areas and 

Qualified Census Tracts 

The effective date section of the 2004 

notice is revised to read as follows: 

The 2004 lists of Difficult 

Development Areas and Qualified 

Census Tracts (including Qualified 

Census Tracts designated in notices FR–

4799–N–01 and FR–4889–N–01) are 

effective (1) for allocations of credit after 

December 31, 2003; or (2) for purposes 

of section 42(h)(4)(B) of the Code, if the 

bonds are issued and the building is 

placed in service after December 31, 

2003. If an area or census tract is not on 

subsequent lists of Difficult 

Development Areas or Qualified Census 

Tracts, the 2004 lists remain effective 

for the area or tract if (1) the allocation 

of credit to an applicant is made no later 

than the end of the 365-day period after 

the submission of a complete 

application by the applicant to the 

credit-allocating agency, and the 

submission is made before the effective 

date of the subsequent lists of Difficult 

Development Areas and Qualified 

Census Tracts; or (2) for purposes of 

section 42(h)(4)(B) of the Code, the 

bonds are issued or the building is 

placed in service no later than the end 

of the 365-day period after the 

submission of a complete application by 

the applicant to the bond-issuing 

agency, and the submission is made 

before the effective date of the 

subsequent lists of Difficult 

Development Areas and Qualified 

Census Tracts, provided that both the 

issuance of the bonds and the placement 

in service of the building occur after the 

application is submitted.

An application is deemed to be 

submitted on the date it is filed if the 

application is determined to be 

complete as certified in writing by the 

credit-allocating agency or bond-issuing 

agency. A ‘‘complete application’’

means that no more than de minimis

clarifications of the application are 

required for the agency to make a 

decision about the allocation of tax 

credits or issuance of bonds covered by 

the application. 

Obligation of Credit-Allocating and 

Bond-Issuing Agencies With Regard to 

Subsidy Amounts 

A governmental unit continues to be 

obligated under section 42(m)(2) of the 

Code to ensure that the amount of 

credits attributable to a project affected 

by this notice do not exceed the amount 

necessary for the financial feasibility of 

the project and its viability as a 

qualified low-income housing project 

throughout the credit period. 

Other Matters 

Environmental Impact 

In accordance with 40 CFR 1508.4 of 

the regulations of the Council on 

Environmental Quality and 24 CFR 

50.19(c)(6) of HUD’s regulations, the 

policies and procedures contained in 

this notice provide for the establishment 

of fiscal requirements or procedures that 

do not constitute a development 

decision that affects the physical 

condition of specific project areas or 

building sites and, therefore, are 

categorically excluded from the 

requirements of the National 

Environmental Policy Act, except for 

extraordinary circumstances, and no 

Finding of No Significant Impact is 

required. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

The Secretary, in accordance with 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) (the Regulatory Flexibility 

Act), has reviewed and approved this 

notice, and in so doing certifies that this 

notice does not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. The notice 

involves the designation of ‘‘Difficult 

63554 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 2, 2004 / Notices 

Development Areas’’ as required by 

Section 42 of the Code, as amended, for 

use by political subdivisions of the 

states in allocating Low-Income Housing 

Tax Credits or issuing tax-exempt 

bonds. This notice places no new 

requirements on the states, their 

political subdivisions, or the applicants 

for credits. This notice also details the 

technical methodology used in making 

such designations. 

Executive Order 12612, Federalism 

Executive Order 13132 (entitled 

‘‘Federalism’’) prohibits an agency from 

publishing any policy document that 

has federalism implications if the 

document either imposes substantial 

direct compliance costs on State and 

local governments and is not required 

by statute, or the document preempts 

State law, unless the agency meets the 

consultation and funding requirements 

of section 6 of the executive order. As 

a result, the notice is not subject to 

review under the order. The notice 

merely designates ‘‘Difficult 

Development Areas’’ and ‘‘Qualified 

Census Tracts’’ as required under 

section 42 of the Code, as amended, for 

the use by political subdivisions of the 

states in allocating Low-Income Housing 

Tax Credits or issuing tax-exempt 

bonds.

Dated: October 28, 2004. 

Alphonso Jackson, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 04–24542 Filed 11–1–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–29–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management 

[OR–030–1020–XX–028H; HAG 05–0014]

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management 

(BLM), Vale District.

ACTION: Meeting notice for the John Day/

Snake Resource Advisory Council. 

SUMMARY: The John Day/Snake Resource 

Advisory Council will meet on 

Thursday, December 2, 2004, 8 a.m. to 

4 p.m. at the Oxford Suites, 2400 SW 

Court Place, Pendleton, OR 97801. 

The meeting may include such topics 

as Forest Service Weeds Plan. There 

will also be subcommittee updates on 

OHV, Noxious Weeds, Planning, Sage 

Grouse, and other matters as may 

reasonably come before the board. 

The entire meeting is open to the 

public. For a copy of the information to 

be distributed to the Council members, 

please submit a written request to the 

Vale District Office 10 days prior to the 

meeting. Public comment is scheduled 

for 11 a.m. to 11:15 a.m., Pacific time 

(P.t.) on December 2, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Additional information concerning the 

John Day/Snake Resource Advisory 

Council may be obtained from Peggy 

Diegan, Management Assistant/

Webmaster, Vale District Office, 100 

Oregon Street, Vale, OR 97918, (541) 

473–3144, or e-mail 

Peggy_Diegan@or.blm.gov.

Dated: October 26, 2004. 

David R. Henderson, 

District Manager.

[FR Doc. 04–24386 Filed 11–1–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–33–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[USITC SE–04–029] 

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United 

States International Trade Commission

TIME AND DATE: November 5, 2004 at 11 

a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 

(202) 205–2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agenda for future meetings: None. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. No. 731–TA–1056 (Final) 

(Certain Aluminum Plate from South 

Africa)—briefing and vote. (The 

Commission is currently scheduled to 

transmit its determination and 

Commissioners’ opinions to the 

Secretary of Commerce on or before 

November 18, 2004.) 

5. Outstanding action jackets: None. 

In accordance with Commission 

policy, subject matter listed above, not 

disposed of at the scheduled meeting, 

may be carried over to the agenda of the 

following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: October 29, 2004. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 04–24585 Filed 10–29–04; 3:31 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

October 25, 2004. 

The Department of Labor (DOL) has 

submitted the following public 

information collection request (ICR) to 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 

44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). A copy of each 

ICR, with applicable supporting 

documentation, may be obtained by 

contacting the Department of Labor 

(DOL). To obtain documentation, 

contact Ira Mills on 202–693–4122 (this 

is not a toll-free number) or e-mail: 

mills.ira@dol.gov.

Comments should be sent to Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attn: OMB Desk Officer for DOL, Office 

of Management and Budget, Room 

10235, Washington, DC 20503, 202–

395–7316 (this is not a toll-free 

number), within 30 days from the date 

of this publication in the Federal 

Register. 

The OMB is particularly interested in 

comments which: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Agency: Employment and Training 

Administration. 

Type of Review: New Collection. 

Title: Supplementary Survey on 

Unemployment Insurance Non-Fliers. 

OMB Number: 1205–0NEW. 

Frequency: Other; One-time 

collection. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households. 

Number of Respondents: 6,000. 

Number of Annual Responses: 6,000.