alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 206.31 Applicability of subpart.

This subpart applies specifically to investigations under section 311(b) of the United States-Australia Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3805 note), section 311(b) of the United States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3805 note), section 311(b) of the United States-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3805 note), section 211(b) of the United States-Jordan Free Trade Area Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 2112 note), section 311(b) of the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3805 note), section 311(b) of the United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3805 note), section 311(b) of the United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3805 note), section 311(b) of the United States-Panama Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3805 note), and section 311(b) of the United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3805 note). For other applicable rules, see subpart A of this part and part 201 of this chapter.

[88 FR 14890, Mar. 10, 2023]
### §1514. Program termination

No new loans shall be made under this subchapter after September 30, 1986. Amounts repaid on or before September 30, 1986, on loans theretofore made under section 1511 of this title shall be deposited in the Geothermal Resources Development Fund for purposes of this subchapter. Amounts repaid after that date on loans theretofore made under section 1511 of this title, and amounts deposited in the Fund for purposes of this subchapter which remain in the Fund after that date and are not required to secure outstanding obligations under this subchapter, shall be deposited into the United States Treasury as miscellaneous receipts.

(Pub. L. 96–294, title VI, §614, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 764.)
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1



Novamerican Steel Inc. Subsidiaries


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME                                              JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
----                                              -----------------------------
<S>                                            <C>
156499 Canada Inc.                                Canada

American Steel & Aluminum Corporation             Massachusetts

Argo Steel Ltd.                                   Quebec

BethNova Tube, LLC (50% owned)                    Delaware (limited partnership)

Cresswell Roll Forming Ltd.                       Canada

Delta Tube and Company, Limited (60% owned)       Quebec (limited partnership)

Integrated Steel Industries, Inc.                 Delaware

Metco Steel Inc.                                  Canada

Novmamerican Tube Holdings, Inc.                  Delaware

Nova Steel Ltd.                                   Quebec

Nova Steel Processing Centre Ltd.                 Canada

Nova Tube and Steel, Inc.                         Delaware

Nova Tube Inc.                                    Quebec

Nova Tube Ontario Inc.                            Canada
</TABLE>
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No: 05-048 March 14, 2005

NRC FINDS NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FROM

EXTENDED OPERATION OF FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued its final environmental impact statement on the

proposed renewal of the operating licenses for the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and

2. The report contains the NRC’s finding that there are no environmental impacts that would preclude

license renewal for an additional 20 years of operation.

The Farley plant is located in Houston County, about 16 miles east of Dothan, Ala. The current

operating licenses expire on June 25, 2017, for Unit 1 and March 31, 2021, for Unit 2. Southern

Nuclear Operating Co. Inc. (SNC), the licensee, submitted an application for renewal of both licenses

on Sept. 15, 2003. 

As part of its environmental review of the application, the NRC held public meetings near the

plant to discuss the scope of the review and the draft version of the environmental impact statement.

Comments were received from members of the public, local officials and representatives of state and

federal agencies.

The Joseph M. Farley Final Environmental Impact Statement is available on the NRC’s Web

site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1437/supplement18/index.html .

Copies are also available for inspection at the NRC’s Public Document Room at One White Flint

North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md.; the Houston Love Memorial Library, 212 West

Burdeshaw St., Dothan, Ala.; and the Lucy Maddox Memorial Library, 11880 Columbia St., Blakely,

Ga.

###
§ 1605.17 Redesignation and recharacterization. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to the redesignation of contributions which, due to employing agency error, were contributed to the participant's traditional balance when they should have been contributed to the participant's Roth balance or were contributed to the participant's Roth balance when they should have been contributed to the participant's traditional balance. This section also applies to the recharacterization of contributions which, due to employing agency error, were contributed as tax-deferred contributions when they should have been contributed as tax-exempt contributions (or vice versa). It is the responsibility of the employing agency to determine whether it has made an error that entitles a participant to error correction under this section.
( b ) *Method of correction.* The employing agency must promptly submit a redesignation record or a recharacterization record in accordance with this part and the procedures provided to employing agencies by the Board and/or the TSP record keeper in bulletins or other guidance.
( c ) *Processing redesignations and recharacterizations.* ( 1 ) Upon receipt of a properly submitted redesignation record, the TSP record keeper shall treat the erroneously submitted contribution (and associated positive earnings) as if the contribution had been made to the correct balance on the date that it was contributed to the wrong balance. The TSP record keeper will adjust the participant's traditional balance and the participant's Roth balance accordingly. The TSP record keeper will also adjust the participant's Roth initiation date as necessary.
( 2 ) Upon receipt of a properly submitted recharacterization record or recharacterization request, the TSP record keeper will update the tax characterization of the erroneously characterized contribution.
( 3 ) Agency automatic (1%) contributions and agency matching contributions cannot be redesignated as Roth contributions or recharacterized as tax-exempt contributions.
( 4 ) There is no breakage associated with redesignation or recharacterization actions.
[77 FR 26426, May 4, 2012, as amended at 87 FR 31678, May 24, 2022]
### §16. Research laboratory for utilization of anthracite coal; establishment of advisory committee; composition; functions; appointment

The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the United States Bureau of Mines, may, in his discretion, create and establish an advisory committee composed of not more than six members to exercise consultative functions, when required by the Secretary, in connection with the administration of sections 13 to 16 of this title. The said committee shall be composed of representatives of anthracite coal mine owners, of representatives of anthracite coal mine workers and the public in equal number. The members of said committee shall be appointed by the Secretary of the Interior without regard to the civil-service laws.

(Dec. 18, 1942, ch. 764, §4, 56 Stat. 1057.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For provisions relating to closure and transfer of functions of the United States Bureau of Mines, see note set out under section 1 of this title.

#### Termination of Advisory Committees

Advisory committees in existence on Jan. 5, 1973, to terminate not later than the expiration of the 2-year period following Jan. 5, 1973, unless, in the case of a committee established by the President or an officer of the Federal Government, such committee is renewed by appropriate action prior to the expiration of such 2-year period, or in the case of a committee established by the Congress, its duration is otherwise provided by law. Advisory committees established after Jan. 5, 1973, to terminate not later than the expiration of the 2-year period beginning on the date of their establishment, unless, in the case of a committee established by the President or an officer of the Federal Government, such committee is renewed by appropriate action prior to the expiration of such 2-year period, or in the case of a committee established by the Congress, its duration is otherwise provided for by law. See section 1013 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### §783. Rules and regulations

(a) The Comptroller General is authorized to make all needful rules and regulations for the Government of the General Accounting Office Building,1 and to annex to such rules and regulations such reasonable penalties, within the limits prescribed in subsection (b), as will ensure their enforcement. Such rules and regulations shall be posted and kept posted in a conspicuous place on such Federal property.

(b) Whoever shall violate any rule or regulation promulgated pursuant to subsection (a) shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both.

(Added Pub. L. 100–545, §1, Oct. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 2728.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

General Accounting Office redesignated Government Accountability Office. See section 8 of Pub. L. 108–271, set out as a note under section 702 of this title.

1 See Change of Name note below.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION (CEO)
 
 YUHE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Yuhe International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gao Zhentao, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
    March 29, 2011
 
 /s/ Gao ZhentaoGao ZhentaoChief Executive Officer
### §909. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–508, title XIII, §13212, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–621

Section, Pub. L. 100–119, title II, §202, Sept. 29, 1987, 101 Stat. 784, prohibited counting as savings transfer of Government actions from one year to another.
### §38b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, June 5, 1952, ch. 369, Ch. I, 66 Stat. 101; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §203(6), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1725, was set out as both this section and section 125a of this title prior to section 125a being editorially reclassified as section 4506 of this title.
Exhibit
32.2




SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION (CFO) 1350




YUHE
INTERNATIONAL, INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Yuhe International, Inc., the “Company”, on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the “Report”, I, Hu Gang, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
March 31, 2009




/s/
      Hu GangHu
      GangChief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-134526, 333-138879, 333-146713 and 333-156976) on Form S-8, of our report dated October 6, 2011, with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements and schedule of eMagin Corporation included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009, which contains an explanatory paragraph regarding a restatement to classify certain warrants as liabilities and to reflect the change in fair value of these warrants in the statement of operations.
 
 By:
/s/  Eisner Amper LLPEisner Amper LLP
 
 New York, New York
 October 6, 2011
#### § 293.301 Applicability of regulations.

Except for those agencies specifically excluded from Office of Personnel Management (OPM) recordkeeping requirements by statute, OPM regulation, or formal agreement between OPM and the agency, this subpart applies to—and within this subpart agency means—each executive department and independent establishment of the Federal Government; each corporation wholly owned or controlled by the United States; and, with respect to positions subject to civil service rules and regulations, the legislative and judicial branches of the Federal Government. OPM will list agencies to which this subpart does not apply in the Guide to Personnel Recordkeeping, and will amend the Guide from time to time to update that list.

[76 FR 52537, Aug. 23, 2011]
#### Diamant Typographic Service, Inc., Respondent, v. Garfield News Co., Inc., Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
exv10w5



 



Exhibit 10.5



Nasca, December 17, 2001



Andrew T. Swarthout

General Manager

Bear Creek Mining Company


Dear Sirs,


The following is our response to your letter of 07-12-01.


It is our intention to reach an agreement to transfer 100% of the Yuri I and
Yuri I-2000 mineral concessions, for the aggregate amount of US$800,000.00
(eight hundred thousand American Dollars) as the consideration for the
transfer, to be paid as follows:



	 	 	 
	• On the sixth month following signing of the agreement	 	
US$80,000
	 	 	 
	• Year to first anniversary of signing of the agreement	 	
US$100,000
	 	 	 
	• Year to second anniversary of signing the agreement	 	
US$200,000
	 	 	 
	• Year to third anniversary of signing the agreement	 	
US$420,000



Minerals extracted during the sixth month assessment will be 100% for the
concession holder(s).


The option agreement will contain the terms and conditions of the definitive
agreement.


If an agreement is reached on good terms, and given the fact that we have to
comply with and complete certain proceedings related to the mineral
concessions, the option agreement will therefore be signed in the (coming)
months following the first quarter of next year (2002).


Yours sincerely,



	 	 	 
	“José Manuel Garayar Guevara”	 	
“Lucio Antonio Hernández Montoya”



“Lucila A. Bendezú Ochoa"

On behalf of Delia Bendezú Ochoa


“Andrew T. Swarthout"

General Manager

Bear Creek Mining Company
### §31. Iowa River, Iowa, above Toolsboro

So much of the Iowa River within the State of Iowa, as lies north of the town of Wapello, and so much of the said river within the State of Iowa, as lies between the town of Toolsboro and the town of Wapello, in the county of Louisa, shall not be deemed a navigable river or public highway, but dams and bridges may be constructed across it.

(R.S. §5248; Aug. 18, 1894, ch. 299, §1, 28 Stat. 356.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §5248 derived from Res. July 13, 1868, No. 55, 15 Stat. 257; act May 6, 1870, ch. 92, 16 Stat. 121.

The portion of this section relating to the Iowa river north of the town of Wapello is from R.S. §5248.

The remainder the section, relating to so much of the river as lies between Toolsboro and Wapello, is from act Aug. 18, 1894.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 28, 2015

p1019

Order 

Clerk

October 28, 2015

148330

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148330

COA: 317783

St Joseph CC: 11-017370-FC

CHAD LAMONT SAVAGE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 15, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the St. Joseph Circuit Court to 

determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under 

the sentencing procedure described in People v Lockridge, 498 Mich 358 (2015). On 

remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If 

the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the 

unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, 

however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence 

absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-05-017 May 6, 2005

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO DISCUSS 2004 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

FOR GRAND GULF NUCLEAR PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Entergy

Operations on May 12 to discuss the results of the agency’s assessment of safety performance for

the Grand Gulf nuclear plant near Port Gibson, Miss.

The meeting will be held at 6 p.m. at Port Gibson City Hall, 1005 College Street, in Port

Gibson. Before the session is adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from

the public on the plant’s safety performance, as well as the agency’s role in ensuring safe

operation of the facility.

“Each year the NRC staff evaluates the performance of each of the nation’s commercial

nuclear plants,” said Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallett. “This meeting gives us a chance

to discuss our assessment with the company, local officials and residents near the plant. We

want to make this information available to the public and answer any questions people may have

about the plant.”

Overall, Grand Gulf operated safely during 2004 and will receive baseline inspections

during 2005. Baseline inspections are performed by the NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to

the plant and by inspection specialists from the Region IV office and the agency’s headquarters

in Rockville, Md. 

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas, to plant officials will

serve as the basis for the meeting. It is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/gg_2004q4.pdf .

Current information for Grand Gulf is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/GG1/gg1_chart.html .

###
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Conceptus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the  Company)
hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



|(i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (the  Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 10, 2011



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Mark M. Sieczkarek 
|Mark M. Sieczkarek     
|Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 89 FR 20832, Mar. 25, 2024.

§ 351.215 Expedited antidumping review and security in lieu of estimated duty under section 736(c) of the Act. ( a ) *Introduction.* Exporters and producers individually examined in an investigation normally cannot obtain a review of entries until an administrative review is requested. In addition, when an antidumping order is published, importers normally must begin to make a cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties upon the entry of subject merchandise. Section 736(c), however, establishes a special procedure under which exporters or producers may request an expedited review, and bonds, rather than cash deposits, may continue to be posted for a limited period of time if several criteria are satisfied. This section contains rules regarding requests for expedited antidumping reviews and the procedures applicable to such reviews.
( b ) *In general.* If the Secretary determines that the criteria of section 736(c)(1) of the Act are satisfied, the Secretary: ( 1 ) May permit, for not more than 90 days after the date of publication of an antidumping order, the posting of a bond or other security instead of the deposit of estimated antidumping duties required under section 736(a)(3) of the Act; and
( 2 ) Will initiate an expedited antidumping review. Before making such a determination, the Secretary will make business proprietary information available, and will provide interested parties with an opportunity to file written comments, in accordance with section 736(c)(4) of the Act.
( c ) *Procedures.* The Secretary will conduct an expedited antidumping review under this section in accordance with § 351.221.