alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Arthur T. Vreeland, Plaintiff in Error, v. Warren Vreeland, Defendant in Error.

Gen. No. 19,046.

(Not to he reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hosea W. Wells, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 4, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Arthur T. Vreeland against Warren Vreeland in the Municipal Court of Chicago. The court ruled that plaintiff’s statement of claim was insufficient to sustain an action. Plaintiff declining to take advantage of leave to file an amended or more specific statement, elected to “to stand by his original statement of claim.” Thereupon the court entered a judgment of *nil capiat*and for costs against him. To reverse the judgment, plaintiff prosecutes a writ of error.

J. Warner Beckstrom, for plaintiff in error.

William A. Morrow, for defendant in error.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Brown

delivered the opinion of the court.

*184Abstract of the Decision.

Municipal Court of Chicago, § *13*
      ***
      *—when statement of claim too vague to state a cause of action.*A statement of claim as follows: “Plaintiff’s claim is upon the contract hereto attached for money had and received by defendant, to-wit, $1000, received by defendant as one of the heirs of John J. Vreeland, deceased, by virtue of a settlement of the suit to contest John J. Vreeland’s will; said sum is one-sixth of the amount received by defendant,” *held*too vague to state a cause of action, in that it did not aver from whom defendant received the money or why and when it was received, and there was no intervening connection between it and the contract.
login|join

        - professional documents
        - home
        - Upload
        - docsters
        - Upload

        - all docs
        - legal
        - business
        - financial
        - technology
        - educational
        - creative
        - BUZZ

# Boll Weevil in Tennessee Using Malathion to Eradicate 

legal > Government > Risk Management Agency 

Risk Management Agency (Agriculture Depa..., Risk Management Agency (Agriculture Depa...

be first to review

RMA

Public Domain

#### Boll Weevil in Tennessee Using Malathion to Eradicate

NASSdocs6/17/2008200legal

#### Tennessee Cooperative Boll Weevil Eradication Program Environmental Assessment July

RMA6/18/20082300legal

#### Boll Weevil Eradication Q A s

RMA6/18/20081500legal

#### Boll Weevil in Tennessee Using Malathion to Eradicate

farmservice9/2/20081300legal

#### Boll Weevil Deliver Us From Weevil leaflet

RMA6/18/20082210legal

#### West Delta Cooperative Boll Weevil Eradication Program

RMA6/18/20081100legal

#### Boll Weevil Trap An Eradication Tool

RMA6/18/20082100legal

#### United States Department of Agriculture Risk Management Agency - 2005

NASSdocs6/17/200810220legal

#### United States Department of Agriculture Risk Management Agency - 2004

NASSdocs6/17/20088600legal

#### Mississippi Boll Weevil Cooperative Eradication Program Environmental Assessment May

RMA6/18/20081900legal

#### Texas and Oklahoma Cooperative Boll Weevil Eradication Program Environmental Assessment April

RMA6/18/20081900legal

#### EPA s Preliminary Risk Assessment on Malathion Q A s

RMA6/18/20081300legal

#### EPA s Risk Assessment on Malathion Q A s

RMA6/18/20081400legal

#### EPA s Risk Assessment on Malathion Q A s - M

RMA6/18/2008600legal

#### Boll Weevil in Tennessee Using Malathion to Eradicate

FoodInspect7/10/20081500legal

#### Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service ­ Program Update

RMA6/18/20088300legal

#### Rule for the Importation of Unmanufactured Wood Articles From Mexico With Consideration for Cumulative Impact of Methyl Bromide Use Final Environmental Impact Statement September

RMA6/18/20086800legal

#### Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service ­ Program Update

RMA6/18/20086800legal

#### Southwest Pink Bollworm Eradication Program Supplemental Environmental Assessment April

RMA6/18/20087000legal

#### Finding of No Significant Impact for Potato Cyst Nematode Eradication in Idaho Amended Environmental Assessment July

RMA6/18/20088200legal

#### Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service ­ Program Update

RMA6/18/20087500legal

#### Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service ­ Program Update

RMA6/18/200811400legal

#### Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service ­ Program Update

RMA6/18/20087000legal

#### Update on USFS Forest Detection Surveys and PPQ National Survey

RMA6/18/20087900legal

#### Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service ­ Program Update

RMA6/18/20087700legal
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-04-024 June 15, 2004

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC SENDS AUGMENTED INSPECTION TEAM TO PALO VERDE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has dispatched a team from its Region IV office in

Arlington, Texas, to the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station to look into the causes of, and

the plant response to, the shutdown of its three reactors at the site on June 14. An electrical grid

disturbance has been identified as the initiating cause of the shutdowns.

Known as an Augmented Inspection Team (AIT), it will be charged with learning the

facts surrounding the event at Palo Verde, which is located near Wintersburg, Arizona and

operated by Arizona Public Service Co.

“Like all nuclear plants, Palo Verde uses off-site power. If that power source is

interrupted, the plant is designed to shut down safely, which is exactly what occurred without 

any danger to public health or safety,” said Region IV Deputy Regional Administrator Thomas P.

Gwynn. “However, because of some complications associated with the event, we want to take a

detailed look at what occurred.”

Team members will arrive at the facility today. The team’s findings will be made public

in an inspection report to be issued within 30 days of completion of on-site reviews.

At about 7:45 a.m. MST on June 14, all three Palo Verde reactors shut down

automatically following a loss of off-site power. As they are designed to, four emergency diesel

generators started up at Units 1 and 3 upon the interruption of off-site power. Those generators

are designed to provide power to key safety systems and assist with the safe shutdown of the

reactors. The loss of off-site power prompted the declaration of an Unusual Event at Units 1 and

3, the lowest level of emergency classification used by the NRC.

However, one of two emergency diesel generators at Unit 2 failed to start. Operators

were able to safely shut down the reactor and cool it using power provided by the diesel

generator that did start. However because only a single power source was available, the licensee

declared an Alert at Unit 2. This is the second lowest of four levels of emergency classification
-2-

used by the NRC. Shortly before 10 a.m. MST, off-site power was restored and the Alert was

downgraded to an Unusual Event. The Unusual Event for all three units was terminated shortly

after noon.

###
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report of The Newark Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the year ended April 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert H. Mullen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented. 

Dated: August 13,2008 

 

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure statement. 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
___________________

SECY NOTE: THIS SRM, SECY-97-096, AND THE COMMISSION VOTING

RECORD CONTAINING THE VOTE SHEETS OF ALL

COMMISSIONERS WILL BE MADE PUBLICLY AVAILABLE 5

WORKING DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS SRM.

June 19, 1997

MEMORANDUM TO: L. Joseph Callan

Executive Director for Operations

FROM: John C. Hoyle, Secretary /s/

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS - SECY-97-096 - MEMORANDUM

OF UNDERSTANDING AND INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND THE

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ON THE

CLOSURE OF HIGH-LEVEL WASTE STORAGE TANKS AT

THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE

The Commission has approved the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)

and Interagency Agreement between DOE and the NRC on the closure

of the high-level waste (HLW) storage tanks at the Savannah River

site, subject to the comments and changes noted below.

(EDO) (SECY Suspense: 6/30/97)

In applying the criteria by which residual waste might be

classified as incidental, the staff should fully consider

potential risks and doses to workers and members of the public,

as well as the costs, that could result from characterization and

alternate disposal of the waste. The staff should also consider

the applicable statutes and regulations (e.g., the Atomic Energy

Act, the Energy Reorganization Act, the NWPA, the codified

version of Part 50, Appendix F, etc.) governing NRC

responsibility and authority regarding high-level waste.

The following changes should be made to the MOU and the

Interagency Agreement:

1) On page 1 of Attachment A to the Interagency Agreement,

in paragraph 1.1, line 8, insert "to" after the word

"regard."

2) On page 1 of the MOU, in the first paragraph, line 3,

delete the word "staff."
-2-

3) On page 1 of the MOU, in the third paragraph, next to

the last line, replace "HLW" with "High-level liquid

radioactive waste." In the last line, replace

"include" with "address."

4) On page 3 of the MOU, in Section B, add item 5:

"DOE-SR will provide office space as necessary to

accommodate NRC visits to the SR site and will

coordinate attendance of all parties to any reviews

requested by the NRC. Close coordination between the

NRC and DOE-SR is essential to timely project

completion."

5) On page 4 of the MOU, in Section V, add item F: "The

NRC will be reimbursed for the cost of activities

within the scope of this MOU, as provided for in the

Interagency Agreement which implements this MOU."

The staff should carefully monitor the Quarterly Financial

Reports for potential cost overruns.

cc: Chairman Jackson

Commissioner Rogers

Commissioner Dicus

Commissioner Diaz

Commissioner McGaffigan

OGC

CIO

CFO

OCA

OIG

Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ACNW, ASLBP (via E-Mail)

PDR

DCS
SCPW-22-0000511 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI 

________________________________________________________________ 

DEXTER K. KAʻIAMA, Petitioner, 

vs. 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Respondent, 

________________________________________________________________

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

(ODC No. 18-0339) 

ORDER 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

 Upon consideration of the materials submitted on 

August 25, 2022 to the appellate clerks by attorney Dexter K. 

Kaʻiama, which was filed as a petition for a writ of mandamus, we 

conclude that attorney Kaʻiama seeks relief from the Disciplinary 

Board of the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court, not from this court. 

Therefore, 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-22-0000511

31-AUG-2022

11:44 AM

Dkt. 7 ORD
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is denied 

without prejudice to attorney Kaʻiama seeking relief from the 

Disciplinary Board.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, August 31, 2022.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Douglas Moran, Royal Bodkin, LLC and Woolworth Interests, LLC v.

Richard Williamson d/b/a Williamson Realty

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00928

- CV

Trial court case number: 2011

- 45234

Trial court: 11th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: May 31, 2016

Party filing motion: Appellee, Richard Williamson d/b/a Williamson Realty

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Jennings, K eyes, and Bland

Date: June 28, 2016
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [ID-400-1120-PH] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Coeur d'Alene District Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as indicated below. 

# DATES:

December 2 and 3, 2004. The meeting will be held in the conference room at Coffeeville located at 1710 North 4th Street in Coeur d'Alene on December 2nd from 10:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. and on December 3rd from 8 a.m. to about 2 p.m. The public comment period will be from 8 a.m. to 9 a.m. on December 3, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Stephanie Snook, RAC Coordinator, BLM Coeur d'Alene District, 1808 N. Third Street, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 or telephone (208) 769-5004. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The 15-member Council advises the Secretary of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of planning and management issues associated with public land management in Idaho. The agenda for the December 2 and 3, 2004, meeting will include: Election of officers, an update on the Idaho BLM Reorganization, an overview of the Coeur d'Alene District programs, reports on past RAC meetings and an update on the Resource Management Plans being prepared for the Coeur d'Alene and Cottonwood Field Offices. 

All meetings are open to the public. The public may present written comments to the Council. Each formal Council meeting will also have time allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact the BLM as provided above. 

Dated: October 26, 2004. 

Stephanie Snook, 

Acting District Manager. 

[FR Doc. 04-24322 Filed 10-29-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-18-00176-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.L.D. AND E.R.D., CHILDREN

From the 378th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 84494-D

ORDER

We referred this appeal to mediation on June 13, 2018. Appellee has timely filed 

an objection to the referral. The objection is sustained.

This appeal will proceed without mediation. The suspension of the appellate 

deadlines is lifted. Appellant’s brief is due 30 days from the date of this Order. 

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Order issued and filed July 3, 2018
§ 1639.25 Voluntary repayment agreements as alternative to salary offset. ( a ) In response to a notice of intent to offset against an employee's salary to recover a debt owed to the Board, an employee may propose to the Board that he or she be allowed to repay the debt through direct payments as an alternative to salary offset. Any employee who wishes to repay a debt without salary offset must submit in writing a proposed agreement to repay the debt. The proposal must admit the existence of the debt and set forth a proposed repayment schedule. The employee's proposal must be received by the official designated in the notice of intent within 15 calendar days after the employee received the notice.
( b ) In response to a timely proposal by the debtor, the Executive Director will notify the employee whether the employee's proposed written agreement for repayment is acceptable. It is within the Executive Director's discretion to accept a repayment agreement instead of proceeding by salary offset.
( c ) If the Executive Director decides that the proposed repayment agreement is unacceptable, the employee will have 15 days from the date he or she received notice of the decision to file a petition for a hearing.
( d ) If the Executive Director decides that the proposed repayment agreement is acceptable, the alternative arrange ment must be in writing and signed by both the employee and the Executive Director.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between James A. Suffridge, as Treasurer of the Retail Clerks International Association, an Unincorporated Association, Appellant, and Metropolitan Package Store Association, Inc., et al., Respon*802dents.

No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diametrics Medical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, W. Glen Winchell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    W. GLEN WINCHELLW. Glen WinchellChief Financial OfficerMay 7, 2004
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-026 April 1, 2002

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC TO MEET WITH RG&E TO DISCUSS GINNA PLANT PERFORMANCE

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Rochester Gas &

Electric (RG&E) Corporation on Tuesday, April 2, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual

assessment of safety performance at the R.E. Ginna nuclear power plant. The facility is located in

Ontario, N.Y., and operated by RG&E.

 The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 3 p.m. at

the Ontario Golf Club, 2101 Country Club Lane, Ontario, N.Y. Before the session is adjourned, NRC

staff will be available to answer questions from the public on the safety performance of the Ginna

plant, as well as the role of the NRC in ensuring safe plant operation.

 The performance period to be discussed is April 1, 2001, to December 31, 2001. In addition,

NRC staff will provide an overview of the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process.

 A letter sent from the NRC Region I office to RG&E addresses the performance of the plant

during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the NRC

web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/ginn_2001q4.pdf

 Current performance information for the Ginna plant is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/GINN/ginn_chart.html

###
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Indian Health Service 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

The Indian Health Service Scholarship Branch, 801 Thompson Avenue, Suite 120, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, Telephone: (301) 443-6197, Fax: (301) 443-6048. 

Dated: October 8, 2004. 

Charles W. Grim, 

Assistant Surgeon General, Director, Indian Health Service. 

[FR Doc. 04-23296 Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-16-U
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 13, 2014

No. 04-14-00339-CR and 04-14-00340-CR

Eddie VASQUEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No.2014CR0910 and 2013CR11644

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In the interest of the efficient administration of the court’s docket, we order Appeal Nos. 

04-14-00339-CR and 04-14-00340-CR consolidated. The parties must file motions, briefs, and 

other pleadings as if the appeals were one but put both appeal numbers in the style of the case. 

However, a record must be filed in each appeal, the record in each case will remain separate and, 

if supplementation of the record becomes necessary, the supplemental material must be filed in 

the appeal to which it applies. The cases must be argued together in one brief, as in a single 

appeal, and if oral argument is requested and granted, the entire case must be argued as a single 

appeal, with the total time limit for each party equal to the ordinary time limit for a party in a 

single appeal. The court will dispose of both appeals in the same judgment, opinion, and 

mandate.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of May, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court