alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-81368-CIV-ALTMAN/Brannon

HOWARD COHAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

PRESIDENTE SUPERMARKET NO 45 INC, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the parties’ Joint Notice of Settlement [ECF 

No. 20]. The Court hereby ORDERS AND ADJUDGES as follows:

1. The above-styled action is administratively CLOSED without prejudice to the parties 

to file a stipulation of dismissal on or before November 12, 2020.

2. If the parties fail to complete the expected settlement, any party may ask the Court to 

reopen the case.

3. All pending deadlines and hearings are TERMINATED, and any pending motions are 

DENIED AS MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida this 13th day of October 2020.

_________________________________

ROY K. ALTMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:20-cv-81368-RKA Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2020 Page 1 of 1
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0000129

14-OCT-2015

09:07 AM
### §2636. Termination

The Commission shall terminate 30 days after the date of the submission of the report of the Commission to Congress.

(Pub. L. 103–3, title III, §306, Feb. 5, 1993, 107 Stat. 25.)
### §604. Disposal of sand, peat moss, etc., in Alaska; contracts

Subject to the provisions of this subchapter, the Secretary may dispose of sand, stone, gravel, and vegetative materials located below highwater mark of navigable waters of the Territory of Alaska. Any contract, unexecuted in whole or in part, for the disposal under this subchapter of materials from land, title to which is transferred to a future State upon its admission to the Union, and which is situated within its boundaries, may be terminated or adopted by such State.

(July 31, 1947, ch. 406, §4, as added Aug. 31, 1950, ch. 830, 64 Stat. 572.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of certain enforcement functions of Secretary or other appropriate officer or entity in Departments of Agriculture and the Interior under this subchapter to Federal Inspector of Office of Federal Inspector for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System, and subsequent transfer to Secretary of Energy, then to Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects, see note set out under section 601 of this title.

#### Admission of Alaska as State

Admission of Alaska into the Union was accomplished Jan. 3, 1959, on issuance of Proc. No. 3269, Jan. 3, 1959, 24 F.R. 81, 73 Stat. c16, as required by sections 1 and 8(c) of Pub. L. 85–508, July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 339, set out as notes preceding section 21 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Robert P. Akins, Chief Executive Officer of Cymer,Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Registrant”), hereby certifies that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

1.               The Registrant’s quarterly report onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, to which this certificationis attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.

 

**In Witness Whereof**,the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 5th day of November, 2004.

 

 
| /s/Robert P.  Akins                       |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert P.  Akins, Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemedfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporatedby reference into any filing of Cymer, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933,as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether madebefore or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any generalincorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
J. Parker Erkmann

T: +1 202 776 2036

perkmann@cooley.com VIA REGULATIONS.GOV & EMAIL

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AV ENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004

- 2400 T: (202) 842

- 7800 F: (202) 842

- 7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM April 22 , 2015

Mr. Paul L. Gretch

Director, Office of International Aviation

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Room W86

- 3163

Washington, DC 20591

Re: DOT

- OST

- 201 3

- 0 103

– Notice of Additional Codeshare for JetBlue and Emirates

Dear Mr. Gretch:

JetBlue Airways Corporation ( “JetBlue” ) and Emirates hereby give 30 days’ not ice of

their intent to display JetBlue’s B6 * designator code on Emirates

- operated flights to an d from an

additional city pai r

, as required under the Notice of Action Taken approving the blanket

statement of authorization granted on July 24 , 201 3 in the above

- referenced docket . The new

city pair is listed below :

MCO

- DXB

The carriers plan to implement this new service on or about September 1 , 2015

. Please

feel free to contact me should you have any questions.

Sincerely,

J. Parker Erkmann

Counsel for JetBlue Airways Corporation

cc: Charles Donley, Counsel for Emirates

Service ListApril 22, 2015

Page Two

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AV ENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004

- 2400 T: (202) 842

- 7800 F: (202) 842

- 7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing 30

- Day Notice Regarding Additional

Codesharing Point was served this 22nd day of April , 2015 via email transmission on the

following:

david.heffernan@cozen.com

Jeremy.Ross@alaskaair.com

abigail.donovan@aa.com

howard.kass@aa.com

robert.wirick@aa.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

c hris.walker@delta.com

dan.weiss@united.com

Thomas.bolling@united.com

steve.morrissey@united.com

gmurphy@crowell.com

nssparks@fedex.com

anbird@fedex.com

matwood@cozen.com

slachter@cozen.com

jcanny@amerijet.com

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com

kevin.montgo mery@polaraircargo.com

anita.mosner@hklaw.com

rpommer@atlasair.com

mlbenge@zsrlaw.com ben.taylor@dot.gov

brett.kruger@dot.gov

brian.hedberg@dot.gov

robert.finamore@dot.gov

john.s.duncan@faa.gov

englets@state.gov

cristinasa@state.gov

William.stallings@usdoj.gov

info@airlineinfo.com

Erin Combs
### §3076. Presentation of United States flag upon retirement

#### (a) Presentation of flag upon retirement

Upon the release of a commissioned officer from active commissioned service for retirement, the Secretary shall present a United States flag to the officer.

#### (b) Multiple presentations not authorized

An officer is not eligible for presentation of a flag under subsection (a) if the officer has previously been presented a flag under this section or any other provision of law providing for the presentation of a United States flag incident to release from active service for retirement.

#### (c) No cost to recipient

The presentation of a flag under this section shall be at no cost to the recipient.

(Pub. L. 107–372, title II, §266, Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3093.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 853v of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 107–372.
**INLAND  FIBER GROUP, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES  (formerly U.S. Timberlands Klamath Falls, LLC)**

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT  TOSECTION 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

             **In  connection with the Annual report of Inland Fiber Group, LLC (the “Company”)  on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John  M. Rudey, Chief Executive Officer of the general partner of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

             1.  The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

             2.  The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

|                    |
|-------------------------|
| /s/ John M. Rudey       |
|                    |
|                    |
| John M. Rudey           |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| May 17, 2004            |

A signed original  of the written statement required by section 906, or other document authenticating,  acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form  within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section  906, has been provided to Inland Fiber Group, LLC and will be retained by Inland  Fiber Group LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its  staff upon request.

----
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-04-010 March 17, 2004

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE

 OF PALO VERDE NUCLEAR PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Arizona

Public Service Co., on Thursday, April 1, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual assessment

of safety performance at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station. The facility is located near

Wintersburg, AZ.

The meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. in Estrella Hall at Estrella Mountain Community

College, 3000 Dysart Road, Avondale. The public is invited to observe the meeting and NRC

officials will be available before the conclusion of the meeting to answer questions from the

public on the safety performance of the plant.

The performance period to be discussed is January 1 to December 31, 2003. In addition,

NRC staff will provide an overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process works.

A letter from the NRC to Arizona Public Service Co. addresses the performance of the

plant during this period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on

the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/palo_2003q4.pdf.

Overall, Palo Verde operated safely and fully met all cornerstone objectives (cornerstones

are measures of plant performance). During a January 14 meeting with company officials, NRC

staff discussed aspects of the safety conscious work environment at Palo Verde. The NRC

believes that the company’s assessment, as well as NRC reviews indicate that staff members feel

free to raise safety issues to Palo Verde management. 

But, APS has identified areas where it plans to focus additional attention. These areas

include employee awareness and familiarity with the company’s Employee Concerns Program
and Differing Professional Opinions Process, as well as the effectiveness of the Management

Issues Tracking and Resolution program in resolving non-nuclear issues. Additionally, it appears

that some workers may not effectively be using the company’s problem identification process. 

Accordingly, the NRC staff will track the licensee’s initiatives in these areas during an

inspection scheduled for May.

Current performance indicators for the three units at Palo Verde are available on the NRC

web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/PALO1/palo1_chart.html. Unit 2

data is at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/PALO2/palo2_chart.html.

Unit 3 data is at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/PALO3/palo3_chart.html.

###
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RAYMOND HARRY MILEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 897 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
§ 2417.204 Where to submit a request or demand. ( a ) Requests or demands for official records, information, or testimony under this part must be served on the Office of the Solicitor at the following address: Office of the Solicitor, Federal Labor Relations Authority, 1400 K Street NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20424-0001; telephone: (771) 444-5775; fax: (202) 343-1007; or email: *solmail@flra.gov .* The request or demand must be sent by mail, fax, or email and clearly marked “Part 2417 Request for Testimony or Official Records in Legal Proceedings.”
( b ) A person requesting public FLRA information and non-public FLRA information under this part may submit a combined request for both to the Office of the Solicitor. If a requester decides to submit a combined request under this section, the FLRA will process the combined request under this part and not under part 2411 (the FLRA's Freedom of Information Act regulations).
[81 FR 63363, Sept. 15, 2016, as amended at 89 11701, Feb. 15, 2024]
### §273. Lease of lands not covered by permits or leases; acreage; rental

Lands known to contain valuable deposits of sulphur and not covered by permits or leases shall be held subject to lease by the Secretary of the Interior through advertisement, competitive bidding, or such other methods as he may by general regulations adopt and in such areas as he shall fix, not exceeding six hundred and forty acres; all leases to be conditioned upon the payment by the lessee of such royalty as may be fixed in the lease and the payment in advance of a rental of 50 cents per acre per annum, the rental paid for any one year to be credited against the royalties accruing for that year.

(Apr. 17, 1926, ch. 158, §3, 44 Stat. 301.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which comprises this chapter.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-16 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, January 29, 1999)

NRC BARS CALIFORNIA COMPANY AND TWO OF ITS MANAGERS

FROM NRC LICENSED ACTIVITIES FOR FIVE YEARS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has barred a manufacturer of storage casks

for spent nuclear fuel and two of its managers from participating in NRC licensed activities for a

period of five years. The restrictions are contained in NRC orders confirming an agreement

between NRC and the parties involved.

NRC took the action after determining that the company, March Metalfab, Inc., of

Hayward, California, and the two managers, provided false and misleading information to NRC

officials looking into problems with the manufacture of casks. These casks are used to store

spent fuel at the Palisades and Arkansas Nuclear One power plants in Michigan and Arkansas,

respectively. The casks involved are being used only at these two nuclear plants.

Problems came to light in March 1995, when workers at the Palisades plant noted that

when a March Metalfab cask was pressurized with helium gas, two leaks were found in the cask

wall next to a weld.

After learning of the problem, NRC staff conducted a special inspection at March

Metalfab’s facility in Hayward, California. During that inspection, Metalfab’s project manager

and quality assurance manager both denied knowledge of any undocumented or unauthorized

welding. NRC subsequently learned that these statements were false.

The NRC has determined that the two managers - Brian K. Rogers and Randall W.

Allmon - were knowledgeable about the fabrication process, were aware that undocumented

welding had been done on the cask shell, and deliberately made false statements in March

1997 to the NRC. The NRC believes that the circumstances raise questions as to the

company’s willingness to comply with Commission requirements.

Although March Metalfab has not admitted that a violation occurred, it agreed this past

December 7, to terms of an NRC confirmatory order barring it from participating in NRClicensed activities for a period of five years. The two managers involved also agreed to similar

orders.

The orders are effective immediately. The company and managers will be permitted to

complete work on one small existing contract involving nuclear work because the cask plug

assemblies being manufactured will have a limited safety function that can be verified by

measurement prior to their use.
##
### SUBCHAPTER I—COMBATING MARINE DEBRIS
§ 2422.26 How are objections to the election processed? ( a ) *Filing objections to the election.* Any party may file objections to the procedural conduct of the election or to conduct that may have improperly affected the results of the election. A party must file an objection and the Regional Director must receive it within five (5) days after the tally of ballots has been served. Any objections must be timely regardless of whether the challenged ballots are sufficient in number to affect the results of the election. The objections must be supported by clear and concise reasons. A party must file an original and two (2) copies of the objections.
( b ) *Supporting evidence.* The objecting party must file evidence, including signed statements, documents, and other materials supporting the objections, with the Regional Director within ten (10) days after the party files the objections.
### §573. Statement by Commonwealth for Secretary

The Commonwealth shall furnish to the Secretary of the Interior a statement with respect to the project showing work done, the status of the project, expenditures and amounts obligated, at such times and in such detail as the Secretary of the Interior shall require for the purposes of this chapter.

(July 15, 1955, ch. 369, §3, 69 Stat. 353.)
#### Domenico Masciocchi, Respondent, v. Banca Commercials Italiana (Agency in New York), et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present—Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.
Exhibit 12.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

I, Alejandro de la Fuente, certify that:

|          |                                                                                        |
|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.  | I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 20-F of Lan Airlines S.A.; |

|          |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.  | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

Date: May 7, 2007

|  | By:    /s/ Alejandro de la Fuente Goic                          Name:   Alejandro de la Fuente Goic          Title:    Chief Financial Officer |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) I, Douglas C. Haskett, II, as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Eastern Virginia Bankshares, Inc., certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Eastern Virginia Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                                            
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: March 31, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Douglas C. Haskett, II                                                 
|                      |  |  |  | Douglas C. Haskett, II
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
### §305. Royalties under lease

The royalty to be paid to the United States under any lease to be issued, or agreement made pursuant to this chapter, shall be determined by the Secretary of the Interior, in no case to be less than 121⁄2 per centum in amount or value of the production, nor for more than twenty years: Provided, That when the oil or gas is produced from land adjacent to the right of way the amount or value of the royalty to be paid to the United States shall be within the discretion of the Secretary of the Interior: Provided further, That when the daily average production of any oil well does not exceed ten barrels per day said Secretary may, in his discretion, reduce the royalty on subsequent production.

(May 21, 1930, ch. 307, §5, 46 Stat. 374.)