alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2429.12 Service of process and papers by the Authority. ( a ) *Methods of service.* Notices of hearings, decisions and orders of Regional Directors, decisions and recommended orders of Administrative Law Judges, decisions of the Authority, complaints, amended complaints, withdrawals of complaints, written rulings on motions, and all other papers required by this subchapter to be issued by the Authority, the General Counsel, Regional Directors, Hearing Officers, Administrative Law Judges, and Regional Directors when not acting as a party under part 2423 of this subchapter, shall be served personally, by first-class mail, by facsimile transmission, by certified mail, or, as described below with respect to documents issued by the Authority, by electronic mail (hereinafter, “email”). Where facsimile equipment is available, rulings on motions; information pertaining to prehearing disclosure, conferences, orders, or hearing dates, and locations; information pertaining to subpoenas; and other similar or time sensitive matters may be served by facsimile transmission. Where a party using the FLRA's eFiling system has consented to electronic service of documents issued by the Authority in a particular case, the Authority shall serve documents on that party exclusively by email to the email address provided by the party.
( b ) *Upon whom served.* All papers required to be served under paragraph (a) of this section shall be served upon all counsel of record or other designated representative(s) of parties, and upon parties not so represented. Service upon such counsel or representative shall constitute service upon the party, but a copy also shall be transmitted to the party.
( c ) *Proof of service.* Proof of service shall be verified by certificate of the individual serving the papers describing the manner of such service. When service is by mail, the date of service shall be the day when the matter served is deposited in the United States mail. When service is by facsimile, the date of service shall be the date the facsimile transmission is transmitted and, when necessary, verified by a dated facsimile record of transmission. When parties are served documents by the Authority by email, the date of service shall be the date the email is sent.
[45 FR 3516, Jan. 17, 1980, as amended at 48 FR 40194, Sept. 6, 1983; 62 FR 40923, July 31, 1997; 88 FR 43426, July 10, 2023]
§ 180.102 Claimants. ( a ) The following are proper claimants: ( 1 ) Officers and employees of OPM;
( 2 ) Former officers and employees of OPM whose claims arose out of incidents which occurred before their separation;
( 3 ) The authorized agent or legal representative of persons in §§ 180.102(a)(1) and 180.102(a)(2);
( 4 ) Survivors of persons in §§ 180.102(a)(1) and 180.102(a)(2) in the following order of precedence: ( i ) Spouse,
( ii ) Children,
( iii ) Father or mother, or both,
( iv ) Brothers or sisters, or both.
( b ) A claim may not be presented by or for the benefit of a subrogee, assignee, conditional vendor, or other third party.
### §28h. Co-ownership

The co-ownership provisions of the Mining Law of 1872 (30 U.S.C. 28) 1 shall remain in effect, except that in applying such provisions, the annual claim maintenance fee required under this Act shall, where applicable, replace applicable assessment requirements and expenditures.

(Pub. L. 103–66, title X, §10103, Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Mining Law of 1872 (30 U.S.C. 28), referred to in text, probably means act May 10, 1872, ch. 152, 17 Stat. 91. That act was incorporated into the Revised Statutes as R.S. §§2319 to 2328, 2331, 2333 to 2337, and 2344, which are classified to sections 22 to 24, 26 to 28, 29, 30, 33 to 35, 37, 39 to 42, and 47 of this title. For complete classification of R.S. §§2319 to 2328, 2331, 2333 to 2337, and 2344 to the Code, see Tables.

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 103–66, Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 312, known as the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993. The annual claim maintenance fee required under this Act probably refers to the fee required under section 28f of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Similar Provisions

Similar provisions were contained in Pub. L. 102–381, title I, Oct. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 1378, 1379.

1 See References in Text note below.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. III-02-025 May 3, 2002

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NEW NRC REGION III PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICER

Viktoria T. Mitlyng, an experienced international journalist and public affairs specialist,

has joined the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III as a public affair officer. She replaces

Pam Alloway-Mueller, who left the agency in January.

The regional office, located in Lisle, Illinois, covers eight states in the midwest.

For the past four years she has been a public relations consultant and account supervisor

for two Chicago-based firms, the Millenson Collabrative and Public Communication, Inc.,

working with health, educational and arts organizations. Her work also included managing

communications programs for such Chicago area institutions as the Shedd Aquarium, the

Brookfield Zoo and the Morton Arboretum. 

She was senior media advisor to the press attache at the U.S. Embassy in Moscow,

Russia, in 1997-98. She previously was a reporter for the Moscow Times, an English-language

daily in Moscow.

Between 1992 and 1994, she ran a journalism program for writers from nuclear and nearnuclear countries, coordinated coverage of international security issues and wrote about politics,

the military and nuclear complexes in the former Soviet Union for the Bulletin of the Atomic

Scientists magazine.

Mitlyng has a master’s degree in French and Russian literature from the University of

Chicago and a bachelor’s degree in French and Russian literature from Amherst College.

Mitlyng, her husband, son and daughter live in Naperville. She can be reached by

telephone at (630) 829-9662, by fax at (630)515-1096 or by e-mail at vtm@nrc.gov.

###
Editorial Note on Part 356
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 356 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

§ 356.29 Confidentiality. ( a ) All proceedings involving allegations of a violation of a protective order or a disclosure undertaking shall be kept confidential until such time as the Department makes a final decision under these regulations, which is no longer subject to reconsideration, imposing a sanction.
( b ) The charged party or counsel for the charged party will be, to the extent possible, granted access to proprietary information in these proceedings, as necessary, under administrative protective order, consistent with the provisions of § 356.10.
### §59g. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 59g was editorially reclassified as section 505 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  U.S.
TIMBERLANDS KLAMATH FALLS, LLC'S DECEMBER 31, 1999 COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               2,798
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        3,340
<ALLOWANCES>                                           200
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     6,919
<PP&E>                                               1,517
<DEPRECIATION>                                         479
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     327,949
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                4,511
<BONDS>                                            225,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                          98,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       327,949
<SALES>                                             76,994
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    76,994
<CGS>                                               40,374
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       48,851
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     (487)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  21,937
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      6,651
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  6,651
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         6,651
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
#### Mildred F. Shaw, Respondent, v. Peter W. Shaw, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

No opinion. Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Jacob Zellner, Appellant-Respondent. Brooklyn Trust Company, as Trustee for Certificate Holders of Bond and Mortgage Guarantee Co. (Guarantee No. 180,532), Respondent-Appellant.

In a proceeding by a tenant to fix the emergency rent of a commercial building, pursuant to chapter 3 of the Laws of 1945, this court reversed an order of the Special Term which confirmed a report of an Official Referee and required the tenant to pay $5,400 per annum as the fair and reasonable rent, and remitted the matter to the Special Term for further proceedings, with instructions to make findings (270 App. Div. 941). In pursuance thereof and after a hearing, the official referee made another report, a decision was rendered by the Special Term containing findings, and an order was made modifying the report by fixing the rent at $5,140.79 per annum. Both tenant and landlord appeal from that order. Order modified on the law and the facts by striking from the first ordering paragraph the words and figures' “ Five Thousand One Hundred and Forty 79/100 ($5,140.79)” and inserting in place thereof the following: “Five Thousand Three Hundred Thirty-four and 85/100 ($5,334.85)”; and by striking out the second ordering *907paragraph. As thus modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. Inconsistent findings are reversed and this court makes the following new finding: “ The proper items and amounts to be taken into consideration as cost of maintenance and operation are, taxes, $1,550.00; insurance, $418.50; and managing agent, $270, making a total of $2,239, to which should be added the sum of $2,400, representing six per centum of $40,000, the value of the property, making a total of $4,639, fifteen per centum of which, or $895.85, should further be added thereto, making a total of $5,334.85.” Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
No. 12,991.

#### Colorado Tax Commission *v.*Colorado Central Power Company.

(29 P. [2d] 1032)

Decided February 5, 1934.

Rehearing denied March 5, 1934.

*294Mr. Clarence L. Ireland, Attorney General, Mr. Fred A. Harrison, Deputy, Mr. E. J. Plunkett, Assistant, Mr. Thomas C. Nixon, Mr. John C. Vivian, Mr. C. C. Conant,, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Lee, Doud, Griffith & Parriott, for defendant, in error.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Bouck

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case is in all its aspects similar to No. 12,990, *Colorado Tax Commission v. Colorado Central Power Company,*94 Colo. 292, 29 P. (2d) 1031, just disposed of on the authority of No. 12,949, same title, 94 Colo. 287, 29 P. (2d) 1030. In the present instance there is involved only that portion of the tax assessment which represented the company’s property in Weld county. The place of trial was, by written stipulation, changed to Jefferson county by way of analogy with the procedure provided in chapter 90, S. L. ’29. While there is a separate transcript of the record herein, the case was by agreement tried here conjointly with the other two. For the reasons set forth in the opinion handed down in No. 12,949, supra, the judgment of the district court of Weld county is likewise reversed with directions to enter a judgment affirming the commission’s assessment.

Judgment reversed with directions.
(November 22, 1943.)

#### In the Matter of Max Glassman, an Attorney.

Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
#### § 185.111 Referral of complaint and answer to the ALJ.

Upon receipt of an answer, the reviewing official shall file the complaint and answer with the ALJ.
Exhibit 23.2

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

Board of Directors
Community First Bancorporation

         We  consent  to   incorporation  by  reference  into  the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-71401) filed by Community First Bancorporation in
connection  with the Community First  Bancorporation  1998 Stock Option Plan and
into the Registration  Statement on Form S-8 (No.  333-66097) filed by Community
First  Bancorporation in connection with the Community First Bancorporation 1989
Stock Option Plan, of our Report dated February 11, 2003,  included in Community
First Bancorporation's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2002.

                                             s/J. W. Hunt & Company, L.L.P.


Columbia, South Carolina
March 26, 2003
=================================================================

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

No. 148 SSM 37

Antonio Garcia,

 Appellant,

 v.

Government Employees Insurance 

Company,

 Respondent.

Submitted by Jonathan A. Dachs, for appellant.

Submitted by Richard A. Fogel, for respondent.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules,

order affirmed, with costs. There is no ambiguity in the policy

as to coverage or divisibility. The parties contracted for $2

million of coverage. Plaintiff's remaining contention lacks

merit. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey,

Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.

Decided December 14, 2017
Exhibit 32.2


                       CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



William H.  Hardman,  Jr., the Vice  President,  Treasurer  and Chief  Financial
Officer of Delta Mills, Inc. (the "Company"),  hereby certifies that to the best
of his knowledge:

     1.   The Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 3, 2004 of the
          Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
          (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

The foregoing  certification  is being furnished  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350
and is not  being  filed  as  part of the  Report  or as a  separate  disclosure
document.





Date     October 15, 2004                   By: /s/ W. H. Hardman, Jr.
      --------------------------------      ------------------------------------
                                            W.H. Hardman, Jr.
                                            Chief Financial Officer





A  signed  copy  of  this  written  statement  required  by  section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### Solicitor for the Affairs of His Majesty’s Treasury, Respondent, v. Bankers Trust Company of New York, Defendant. Robert W. Maitland-Tennent, Appellant.

Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ.; Shientag, J., dissents and votes to affirm. Settle order on notice. [199 Misc. 498.] [See post, p. 733.]
### §§261 to 270. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–65, §11(a), Dec. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 701

Section 261, act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title III, §302, 60 Stat. 839, defined terms used in this chapter.

Section 262, act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title III, §303, 60 Stat. 840, related to detailed accounts of contributions and retention of receipted bills of expenditures.

Section 263, act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title III, §304, 60 Stat. 840, required receipts for contributions.

Section 264, act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title III, §305, 60 Stat. 840, required filing of statements of accounts with Clerk of House.

Section 265, act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title III, §306, 60 Stat. 841, related to proper filing and preservation of statements filed with Clerk of House.

Section 266, act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title III, §307, 60 Stat. 841, related to persons to whom chapter was applicable.

Section 267, act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title III, §308, 60 Stat. 841, related to registration of lobbyists with Secretary of Senate and Clerk of House and required compilation of information required.

Section 268, act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title III, §309, 60 Stat. 842, required that reports and statements be made under oath.

Section 269, act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title III, §310, 60 Stat. 842, related to penalties and prohibitions for violations of this chapter.

Section 270, act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title III, §311, 60 Stat. 842, related to exemptions from this chapter.

For provisions relating to disclosure of lobbying activities to influence the Federal Government, see section 1601 et seq. of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 1996, except as otherwise provided, see section 24 of Pub. L. 104–65, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1601 of this title.

#### Short Title

Act Aug. 2, 1946, title III, §301, 60 Stat. 839, provided that title III of act Aug. 2, 1946 (enacting this chapter), could be cited as the "Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act", prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–65, §11(a), Dec. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 701.
#### § 2429.4 Referral of policy questions to the Authority.

Notwithstanding the procedures set forth in this subchapter, the General Counsel, the Assistant Secretary, or the Panel may refer for review and decision or general ruling by the Authority any case involving a major policy issue that arises in a proceeding before any of them. Any such referral shall be in writing and a copy of such referral shall be served on all parties to the proceeding. Before decision or general ruling, the Authority shall obtain the views of the parties and other interested persons, orally or in writing, as it deems necessary and appropriate.
#### Henry Scherer, Appellant, v. Joseph Fallert Brewing Company, Limited, and August Schweitzer, Respondents, and Another, Defendant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NEURO 
NAVIGATIONAL CORPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1996 AS SHOWN IN THE 10-QSB FILING
</LEGEND>

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1996 
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                               23,108     
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       511,577
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                       1,417,991
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1,986,835
<PP&E>                                              183,665
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2,268,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2,020,207
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             1,867,795
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                              9,934
<OTHER-SE>                                       13,847,536
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2,268,898
<SALES>                                           1,306,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,306,924
<CGS>                                               890,416
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       890,416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,853,316
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   41,448
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,477,055)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          3,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,480,655)                   
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,480,655)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.15)

                                    

        

</TABLE>
### §1522. Limitations on export provisions of section 185(u) of title 30 unaffected

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to amend, restrict, or otherwise limit the application of section 185(u) of title 30.

(Pub. L. 93–627, §23, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2147.)
### §§72a–1, 72a–1a. Repealed. Pub. L. 90–57, §105(i)(4), (5), July 28, 1967, 81 Stat. 144

Section 72a–1, acts Feb. 19, 1947, ch. 4, 61 Stat. 5; June 14, 1948, ch. 467, 62 Stat. 423, provided for compensation of clerical employees of Senate standing committees. See section 4575(e) of this title.

Section 72a–1a, acts Aug. 5, 1955, ch. 568, §1, 69 Stat. 505; June 20, 1958, Pub. L. 85–462, §4(h), 72 Stat. 208; Aug. 27, 1966, Pub. L. 89–545, 80 Stat. 357, limited compensation of committee staff employees. See section 4575(e) of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Aug. 1, 1967, see section 105(k) of Pub. L. 90–57, set out as an Effective Date note under section 4575 of this title.