UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WASHINGTON, DC

Regulatory Docket No.

__________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF:

BROCK JARKA
FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF

TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI Phantom 2 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS

PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012

(PUBLIC LAW 112

- 95)

Submitted on June 23 , 2015

Brock Jarka

1865 Willowcreek Rd

.

Portage, IN 46368

219. 8 51.8201
bjarka@songernet.comTABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

................................ ................................ ........................ 3

SUMMARY

................................ ................................ ................................ ......................... 4

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER

................................ ....................... 4

BACKGROUND

................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 4

BASIS FOR PETITION

................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 5

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER

................................ ................................ ................... 7

THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF 14 C.F.R. FROM WHICH BROCK JARKA SEEKS EXEMPTION

................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 8

THE EXTENT OF RELIEF BROCK JARKA SEEKS AND THE REASON BROCK
JARKA SEEKS THE RELIEF

................................ ................................ ............................. 12

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING BROCK JARKA’ S REQUEST WOULD BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST

................................ ................................ . 15THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTION WOULD NOT

ADVERSELY AFFECT SAFETY

................................ ................................ .................... 18

SUMMARY THAT CAN BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER

.................. 33

ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, VIEWS, OR ARGUMENTS AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT BROCK JARKA ’S REQUEST

................................ . 34

CONCLUSION

................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 35

APPENDICES

................................ ................................ ................................ ......................... 36

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

AGL Above Ground Level

AOI Area of Interest

ATC Air Traffic Control

ATO Air Traffic Organization

AV Aerial Vehicle

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

COA Certificate of Authorization

FAA Federal Aviation Administration

FAR Federal Aviation Regulation

GCS Ground Control Station

GPS Global Positioning System

LOL Loss of Link

MSL Mean Sea Level
NAS National Airspace System NOTAM Notice to Airman

PIC Pilot In Command

Section 333 Faa Modernization and Reform act of 2012 (FMRA)

SO Safety Observer

SOP Standard Operating Proceedures

UA Unmanned Aircraft

UAS Unmanned Aircraft System

VFR Visual Flight Rules

VLOS Visual Line of Sight

VMC Visual Meterological Conditions

VTOL Vertical Takeoff and LandingSUMMARY

BROCK JARKA seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA). This exemption will

per mit BROCK JARKA to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography of construction sites, real estate, farmland, and landscape over certain areas of the United States.

INTRODUCTION AND INTERES TS OF THE PETITIONER

BROCK JARKA provides his clients with expertise and knowledge in advanced technologies and solutions to increase efficiency, productivity and effectiveness. He has

over 3 years recreational/hobby experience in all aspects of aerial video and photography. The objective of BROCK JARKA and his aerial operations is to safely provide high quality imaging for a variety of commercial, public, and residential uses, specifically targeting:

S Agriculture

S General aerial still photos

S Wildlife population surveys

S Real Estate marketing

S Motion Picture Filming

S Aerial inspections of public and private

structures.

BACKGROUND

Unmanned Aircraft Systems: DJI Phantom 2 UASs

BROCK JARKA seeks an exemption to operate DJI systems for compensation orhire within the NAS. The DJI Phantom 2 is a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL)

Unmanned Aircraft (UA) with a Ground Control Station (GCS) utilizing electronic tablet or smart phone systems. The DJI Phantom 2 has a maximum gross weight of approximately 2 pounds 11 ounces, while having a length of 16 inches, width of 16 inches, height of 8 inches, and a maximum speed of approximately 29 knots. The DJI Phantom 2 UA is equ ipped with four main rotors, driven by Lithium Polymer battery powered electric

motors.
The DJI Phantom 2 UA that will be operated by BROCK JARKA will be registered in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 44103, Registration of Aircraft , as well as 14 C.F.R Part 47, Aircraft Registration , and marked in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 45, Identification and Registration Marking

.

BASIS FOR PETITION

Petitioner, BROCK JARKA , pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R. § 11.61) and the FAA Mode rnization and Reform Act of 2012 (FM RA), Section 333, Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems

, hereby petitions the Administrator to commercially operate the DJI Phantom 2 UA in the National Airspace System (NAS), and for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61 .113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91 .121, 91.151(b), 91 .405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91 .41 7(a) & (b).

In consideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operating area associated with the
unmanned aircraf

t and its operation, BROCK JARKA ’s operation of the DJI Phantom 2 UA meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333 and therefore, will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Accordingly, BROCK JARKA requests re lief from Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements for maintenance that only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate.

BROCK JARKA submits that the requested relief is proper since an equivalent level of safety will be ensured. BROCK JARKA will use experienced personnel or technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UASs using the methods, techni ques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Instruction Manual). Furthermore,
BROCK JARKA will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 2 UA.

Relief from certain requi rements of Section 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Private PilotPrivileges and Limitations: Pilot in Command , is requested by BROCK JARKA to the

extent necessary to allow a Pilot in Command (PIC) holding a private pilot or higher leve l certificate, as well as an airman medical certificate, and who has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 UA in a manner consistent with this exemption, including e vasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles, and structures.

BROCK JARKA seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil Aircraft Airworthiness , because the DJI Phantom 2 UA does not require an airw orthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. As such, BROCK
JARKA submits that he will ensure that the DJI Phantom 2 UA is in an airworthy condition, prior to every flight, by determining that the UA is in compliance with the

oper ating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Instruction Manual), and that the aircraft is in a condition for safe flight.

BROCK JARKA also seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter Settings , as the DJI Phantom 2 UA will not have a typical barometric altimeter onboard. However, altitude information of the DJI Phantom 2 UA will be provided to the PIC via Global Positioning System (GPS) equipment and radio communications telemetry data link, which down links from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path. This altitude information, combined with BROCK
JARKA ’s operation of the DJI Phantom 2 UA within visual line of sight, at or below 500 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121.
Additionally, BROCK JARKA seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.151(b), entitled Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions

. BROCK JARKA submits that safety will not be affected by operation of the DJI Phantom 2 UA during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC) under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of approximately 13.5 minut es to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes.

In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, BROCK JARKA provides the following information in support of his petition for exemption:Name And Address Of The Petitioner.

The name and address of the Petitioner and point of contact is:

BROC K JARKA

1865 Willowcreek R d Portage, IN 46368

219

- 8 51

- 8201

bjarka@songernet.comThe Specific Sections Of 14 C.F.R. From Which BROCK JARKA Seeks Exemption.

1. BROCK JARKA Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b).

Section 61 .113, entitled Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: Pilot in
Command , subsections (a) and (b) prescribe the following, in relevant part:

(a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command (PI C ) of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may that person, for compensation or hire, act as PI C
of an aircraft.

(b) A private p ilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PI C of an aircraft in connection with any business or employment if

— (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and
(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

2. BROCK JARKA Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a).

Section 91.7, entitled Civil Aircraft Airworthiness , subsection (a), states the following:

(a) No person m ay operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition.

3. BROCK JARKA Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121.

Section 91 .121, entitled Altimeter Settings, subsection (a), states the following, in part:

(a) Each person operati ng an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight level of that aircraft, as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, when operating

--(1) Below 18,000 feet MSL, to

-- (i) The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and within 100 nautical miles of the aircraft;

(ii) If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the current reported altimeter setting of an appropriate available station; or
(iii) In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.

4. BROCK JARKA Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b).
Section 91.151, entitled Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions

, subsection

(b), states the following:

(b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast we ather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 20 minutes.

5. BROCK JARKA Seeks Exemption From The Requirement Of Section 91.405(a).

Section 91 .405, entitled Maintenance required , subsection (a), states the following: Each owner or operator of an aircraft

— (a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as pr ovided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter[.]

6. BROCK JARKA Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.407(a)(1)

Section 91.407, entitled Operation After Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, Rebuilding, or Alteration , subsection (a) (1), states the following:(a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance,

preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless

-- (1) It has been approved for return to service by a person authorized under § 43.7 of this chapter.

7. BROCK JARKA Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.409(a)(1) And 91.409(a)(2).

Section 91.409, entitled Inspecti ons , subsection (a), states the following:

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an aircraft unless, within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had

--
(1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and has been approved for return to service by a person authorized by § 43.7 of this chapter; or

(2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in accordance with part 21 of this chapter.

8. BROCK JARKA Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.417(a) And 91.417(b).

Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance Records , subsections (a) and (b), state the following:

(a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413, each registered owner or operator shall keep the following records for the periods specified in paragraph (b) of this section:
(1) Records of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration and
records of the 100

- hour, annual, p rogressive, and other required or approved inspections, as appropriate, for each aircraft (including the airframe) and each engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance of an aircraft. The records must
include

-- (i) A description (or reference to data acceptabl e to the Administrator) of the work performed; and

(ii) The date of completion of the work performed; and

(iii) The signature, and certificate number of the person approving
the aircraft for return to service.

(2) Records containing the following informati on:(i) The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each propeller, and each rotor.

(ii) The current status of life

- limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance.

(iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which are required to be overhauled on a specified time basis.
(iv) The current inspection status of the aircraft, including the time since the last inspection required by the inspection program under which the aircraft and its appliances are maintained.

(v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and safety directives including, for each, the method of compliance, the
AD or safety directive number and revision da te. If the AD or safety directive involves recurring action, the time and date when the next action is required.
(vi) Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for each major alteration to the airframe and currently installed engines, rotors, propellers, and appliances.

(b) The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods prescribed:

(1) The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section s hall be retained until the work is repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 year after the work is performed.

(2) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be retained and transferre d with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold.

(3) A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 of this chapter shall be retained until the defects are repaired and the aircraft is approved for return to service.The Extent Of Relief BROCK JARKA Seeks And The Reason
BROCK JARKA Seeks The Relief.

1. Extent Of Relief BROCK JARKA Seeks And The Reason BROCK
JARKA Seeks Relief From Section 61.113(a) And (b).

Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b ) entitled Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations:
Pilot in command , is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PI C holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as well as a current and valid airman medical certificate,

a nd who has met certain flight

- hour and currency requirements, to conduct the proposed UAS flight operations for compensation or hire.
This relief is requested since the limitations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b) state that a private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PI C of an aircraft in connection
with any business or employment if: (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and (2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation
or hire.

As set forth more fully below, BROCK JARKA submits that an equivalent level of safety
will be maintained because no PI C will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 2 UA
unless that PI C has met certain flight

- hour and currency requirements, demonstrating that
the P I C is able to safely operate either the DJI Phantom 2 UA in a manner consistent with the operations specifications as described in this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers, as well as maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles, and structures.

Further, BROCK JARKA submits that all flights of the DJI Phantom 2 UA, conducted by the PI C pursuant to the grant of this Petition: (1) will be incidental to BROCK
JARKA ’s business; and (2) will not carry passengers or property f or compensation or hire.2. Extent Of Relief BROCK JARKA Seeks And The Reason BROCK
JARKA Seeks Relief From Section 91.7(a).

Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness , is requested to the extent required to allow BROCK JARKA to determine that the DJI Phantom 2 UA is in airworthy condition prior to every flight by ensuring that the UAS is in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log and DJI Phantom 2 Instruction Manual)

.
BROCK JARKA seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 2 UA does not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Therefore, BROCK JARKA will ensure that the DJI Phantom 2 UA is in airworthy condition base d upon its compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Instruction Manual) prior to every flight, and further, determine that the aircraft is in condition for safe flight, as stated in the
conditions and limita tions below.

3. Extent Of Relief BROCK JARKA Seeks And The Reason BROCK
JARKA Seeks Relief From Section 91.121.

Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter Settings, may be required to allow flight operations of the DJI Phantom 2 UA, which utilizes a b arometric pressure sensor, GPS equipment, and a radio communications telemetry data link to downlink altitude information from the UA to the PIC at the ground control station (GCS). Since the FAA requires that any altitude information concerning UAS operat ions be reported to air traffic control (ATC) in feet above ground level (AGL), BROCK JARKA seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 2 UA’s altimeter may be set on the ground to zero feet AGL, rather than the local barometric pressure or field al titude, before each flight.

Considering the limited altitude of the proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR 91.121 is sought to the extent necessary to comply with the applicable conditions and limitations stated below. As more fully set forth herein, an e quivalent level of safety will be maintained since the DJI Phantom 2 UA is equipped with a barometric pressure sensor and GPS equipment, which automatically ensures that a ground level pressure setting will be established prior to each flight, and provides the PIC with altitude information of the UA on the heads

- up display of the GCS.4. Extent Of Relief BROCK JARKA Seeks And The Reason BROCK
JARKA Seeks Relief From Section 91.151(b).

Relief from Section 91.151(b) entitled Fuel Req uirements for Flight in VFR Conditions, is requested to the extent required to allow flights of the battery powered DJI Phantom 2 UA during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), for a total duration of 1 3.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes. BROCK JARKA seeks the requested relief because without an exemption from Section 91.151(b), the flight time duration of the battery powered DJI Phantom 2 UA will severely constrain the practicality of any aerial video or still photo flight operations that BROCK JARKA proposes to conduct pursuant to this Petition.

Significantly, as set forth below, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 2 UA, the DJI Phantom 2 and BROCK JARKA ’s proposed operating limitations, ensure that
BROCK JARKA will safely operate the battery powered DJI Phantom 2 UA during daylight ho urs in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 13.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes.

5. Extent Of Relief BROCK JARKA Seeks And The Reason BROCK

JARKA Seeks Relief From Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b).

Since Sections 91 .405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91 .41 7(a) & (b) only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, BROCK JARKA requests relief from these Sections because the DJI Phantom 2 UA does not require airworthiness certificates. As set forth more fully below, the DJI Phantom UAS meets the condition s of FMRA Section 333 for operation without an airworthiness certificate. Accordingly, BROCK
JARKA will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribe d in the UAS operating documents (i.e., the Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, BROCK JARKA will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 2 UAS.The Reasons Why Gran ting BROCK JARKA ’s Request Would Be In

The Public Interest; That Is, How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole.

Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing BROCK
JARKA to safely, efficiently, and economically perform aerial video and photography of construction sites, real estate, and landscape over certain areas of the
United States.

Additionally, use of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS will decrease congestion of the NAS, reduce pollution, and provide significant benefits to the economy , as well as, reducing risks placed on workers currently doing this job . Notably, the benefits of BROCK JARKA ’s proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS will be realized without implicating any privacy issues.
1. The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS.

The DJI Phantom 2 UA is battery powered and serves as a safe, efficient, and economical alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial imagery. By reducing the number of manned aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions, an exemption allowing the use of a DJI Phantom 2 UAS would reduce the number of manned aircraft in the NAS and reduce noise and air pollution, as well as increase the safety of l ife and property in the air and on the ground.
Furthermore, by reducing the number of manned aircraft operating in the NAS, congestion around airports caused by arriving and departing aircraft will be reduced. The DJI Phantom 2 UA does not require an airpo rt to takeoff or land. Likewise, a reduction of manned aircraft conducting aerial video and photography missions would result in fewer aircraft that must be handled by air traffic control during the ground, takeoff, departure, arrival, and landing phases o f flight operations.

2. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The DJI
Phantom 2 UAS.

Conducting aerial acquisitions with the DJI Phantom 2 UAS, instead of manned aircraft, will greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the leve ls of air and noise pollution generated during traditional aerial video and still photography flight operations. By using battery power and electric motors, the DJI Phantom 2 UAS produce no air pollution, and is the most viable environmentally conscious al ternative to the cabin class, six cylinder internal combustion engine aircraft that are typically utilized for aerial video and photography, while burning approximately 20

- 30 gallons per hour of leaded aviation fuel. The DJI Phantom 2 UA, whilereducing the carbon footprint of aerial acquisitions, also eliminates noise pollution, as the

UAs are propelled by battery

- powered electric motors, rather than an internal combustion engine.
By using the DJI Phantom 2 UAS to perform aerial acquisitions, th e substantial risk to life and property in the air and on the ground, which is usually associated with traditional manned aircraft flight operations, will be substantially reduced or completely eliminated. Aside from the lack of flight crew members located onboard the aircraft, the DJI Phantom 2 UA (weighing approximately 2 pounds 11 ounces at its maximum gross weight with a length of 16 inches and widths of 16 inches and with no fuel on board), has less phy sical potential for collateral damage to life and property on the ground, and in the air, compared to the manned aircraft that typically conduct similar operations (weighing approximately 6,000 pounds with a wingspan of approximately 42 feet, a length of 3 4 feet, and a fuel capacity of 180 gallons).

3. Performing Aerial Video and Photography Operations With The DJI Phantom 2 UAS Will Benefit The Economy.

In addition to being safe and efficient, the DJI Phantom 2 UA is also an economical alternative to using manned aircraft to conduct similar aerial operations. As such, operation of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS will allow United States based companies, like BROCK
JARKA , to remain competitive and contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Specifically, with the rising cost of aviation fuel and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulatory actions phasing out leaded aviation fuels, U.S. owned and operated companies must adopt new and alternative technology in order to remain competitive. Operating the battery pow ered DJI Phantom 2 UAS is one such technology that not only allows companies greater operational flexibility compared to manned aircraft, but provides such flexibility without the high operational cost of a traditional manned aircraft.

By operating the DJI Phantom 2 UAS, companies such as BROCK JARKA

, can remain competitive and profitable, and therefore, provide greater job stability to employees and contractors, which will ultimately contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Improved financial performance of U.S. companies, through commercial use of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS, provides a stable workforce that increases consumer spending; improves local, state, and federal tax revenues; and allows companies to invest in research and development in order to remain competitive both in the United States and abroad.

4. There Are No Privacy Issues.

Similar to the manned aerial acquisition flight operations that have been conducted fordecades, BROCK JARKA ’s proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS will not

implicate any privacy issues. Specifically, the DJI Phantom 2 UAS will be operated only in compliance with operating documents (i.e., The Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Instruction Manual) which requires property owner involvement as well as local law enforcement notification, and in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations, including the minimum altitude requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.119.The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Adversely Affect Safety, Or How The Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That Provided By The Rule From Which BROCK JARKA Seeks Exemption.

1. Reasons Why The DJI Phantom 2 UA Meets The Conditions Of The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333.

In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned aircraft and its operation, BROCK JARKA ’s operation of the DJI Phantom 2
UAS meets the conditi ons of FMRA Section 333, and will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H.
Section 333 provides authority for a UAS to operate without airworthiness certification and sets forth requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security. Specifically, FMRA Section 333 states the following, in part:

(a) In General.

-- Notwithstanding any other requirement of this subtitle, and not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall determine if certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system before completion of the plan and rulemaking requir

ed by section 332 of this Act or the guidance required by section 334 of this Act.

(b) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

-- In making the determination under subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum

--
(1) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size, weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and populated areas, and operation within visual line of sight do not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public or pose a threat to national security; and

(2) whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or airworthiness certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States Code, is required for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems identified under paragraph (1).(c) Requirements for Safe Operation.

-- If the Secretary determines under this section that certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall est ablish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.

In seeking this exemption, BROCK JARKA submits that the DJI Phantom 2 UAS can operate safely in the NAS pursuant to FMRA Section 333, as demonstrated by: ( a) the characteristics of the DJI Phantom 2 UA; (b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the specific operating limitations.

a. The Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 2 UAS Demonstrates Its
Safe Characteristics.

The DJI Phantom 2 UAS does not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security considering its size, weight, speed, and operational capability.

i. Technical Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 2 UAS

The technical specifications of the DJI Phant om 2 UAS are set forth by the DJI Phantom 2 User Manual, attached hereto as Appendix A.

ii. The DJI Phantom 2 UAS Autonomous Flight And Navigation
Modes Enable The UAS To Remain Within A Defined Operational Area.The DJI Phantom 2 UAS may be operated in both manual and fully autonomous flight

modes. A complete description of the flight and navigational modes of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS is provided at pages 25

- 3 5 of the DJI Phantom 2 User Manual, attached hereto as Appendix A.

iii. The DJI Phantom 2 UAS Are Designed For Automatic Return

To Home Point Or Hover In The Event Of Loss Of The Control Link Or Navigation.

When the Control Link is lost, the DJI Phantom 2 UA will remain stationary, in flight, for 3 seconds or more. If, after 3 seconds, the DJI Phantom 2 UA does not reacquire control link data from the GCS, the UA will assume that the Control Link is lost and the UA will return to the home position (i.e., failsafe mode) via GPS, and will descend to the takeoff position and shutd own.
A complete description of the Failsafe Function of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS is set forth at pages 27 through 29 of the DJI Phantom 2 User Manual, attached hereto as Appendix A.

iv. The DJI Phantom 2 GCS And Its Operation.

A complete description of the operation and specifications of the DJI Phantom 2 GCS and flight control software is provided at pages 32 through 43 of the DJI Phantom 2 User Manual. DJI Phantom 2 User Manuals are attached hereto as Appendix A.

b. Flight Op erations Of DJI Phantom 2 UAS Are Limited To The Line Of Sight Of A Certificated Pilot in Command With A Safety Observer.

BROCK JARKA will be the only person to act as a pilot in command (PIC) of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS. Additionally, a safety observer will assist him during flight time.

c. Flights Of DJI Phantom 2 UAS Will Be Conducted Pursuant To Specific Operating Limitations.In seeking this exemption, BROCK JARKA proposes to commercially operate DJI

Phantom 2 UAS for the special purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States, pursuant to the following specific operating
limitations:

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the

following aircraft described in the operating documents, rotorcraft UASs weighing less than 55 pounds maximum gross weight: DJI Phantom 2 Unmanned Aircraft System. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this grant.

2. UAS operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting operations for the purpose of aerial video and photography.

3. The UA may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more tha n 500 feet above ground level (AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the operating documents unless a special request is made and approved by ATC. All altitudes reported to ATC must be in feet AGL.

5. T he UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA

- issued airman
medical certificate.

6. The use of first person view (FPV) by the PIC or safety observer (SO) is not permitted.

7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The SO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times.Electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The

PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the d uration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the SO can perform the functions prescribed in the operating documents.

8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PIC with seeing and avoiding other air traffic and other ground based obstacles/obstructions and is not permitted to operate the camera or other
instruments.

9. The operating documents and the grant of exemption must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy e xists between the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption take precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised documents to the Administrat or upon request. The operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension or amendment to the grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted the exemption, then the operator must petition for amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS

- 80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents.

10. Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition for safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The Ground Control Station must be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and alterations must be properly
documented in the aircraft records.

11. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight criticalcomponent, must undergo a functional test flight. The PI C who conducts the

functional test flight must make an entry in the aircraft records.

12. The pre

- flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g. inoperable components, items, or equipment, not already covered in the relevant sections of the operating d ocuments.

13. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s aircraft/component, maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements.

14. The operator must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record keeping requirements, in accordance with the operating documents. Maintenance, inspection, alterations, and status of replacement/overhaul component parts must be noted in the aircraft records, including total time in service, description of work accomplished, and the signature of the authorized person returning the UAS to service.

15. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer Safety Bulletins.

16. The authorized person must make an entry in the aircraft record of the corrective action taken agai nst discrepancies discovered between inspections.

17. The operator may not permit any PI C to operate unless the PI C meets the operator’s qualification criteria and demonstrates the ability to safely operate
the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures. PI C qualification flight hours must be logged in a manner consistent with 14 G.F.R.§ 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs are

permitted under the terms of the exemption. However, training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During training, proficiency, and experience

- building flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 C.F.R. §
91 .119.

18. UAS op erations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R. § 1.1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). If flight at night is required, a special request will be made at the FAA office closest to proposed a rea of operations. Flights under special visual flight rules (SV FR) are not authorized.

19. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point as denoted on a current FAA

- published aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained, and the operation is conducted in accordance with a NOTAM as required by the operator’s COA. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator upon reque st.

20. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles
from the PIC.

21. If the UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to a

pr e

- determined location within the planned operating area and land or be recovered in accordance with the operating documents.

22. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies in accordance with the operating documents.24. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal cruising speed to the intended landing point and land the UA with 25% battery powe r remaining.

25. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO)

- issued Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under the grant of exemption. This COA will also require the operator to request a Notice to Airman (NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in advance, but not less than 48 hours prior to the operation. All operations shall be conducted in accordance with airspace requirements in the ATO issued COA including class of airspace, altitude level and potential transponder requirements.

26. All aircraft operated in accordance with the exemption must be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 47, and have identification (N

- Number) markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable.

27. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation and control of the UA must comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or other appropriate government overs ight agency requirements.

28. The documents required (fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203) must be available to the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the UAS is operating. These documents must be made available to the
Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

29. The UA must remain clear and yield the right of way to all manned aviation operations and activities at all times.

30. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device o r vehicle.31. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all

nonparticipating persons (persons other than the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons), vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barrier s or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonpartic ipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately and/or;

b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where the
owner/controller of such v essels, vehicles or structures has granted permission and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard, and;

c. Operations nearer to the PIC, SO, operator tra inees or essential persons do not present an undue hazard to those persons per § 91.119(a).

32. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled

- access property with permission from the land owner/controller or authorized representative.
Permis sion from land owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted.

33. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the ap plicable COA must be reported to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS

- 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov

.2. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.1 13(a) And (b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

BROCK JARKA submits that the equivalent level of safety established by Section 61 .113(a) and (b) will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 2 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneu vers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles, and structures.
Considering BROCK JARKA ’s proposed area of operations and the operating limitations set forth

- above, the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge requ irements to those of commercial pilot requirements (See Exemption No. 11062), and the airmanship skills necessary to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 UAS, BROCK JARKA submits that the additional manned airmanship experience of a commercially certificated p ilot would not correlate to the airmanship skills necessary for BROCK JARKA ’s specific proposed flight operations.

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

BROCK JARKA will not allow any PIC to operate the DJI Phantom 2 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour requirements or the DJI Phantom 2 UAS training and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 UAS in a manner co nsistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles, and structures.
Specifically, the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61 .51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot (with a minimum of 5 hours of those hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the exemption). In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must

ac complish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes).

As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 11138, and 11153, prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations will ensure an equivalent level of safety during BROCK JARKA ’s proposed operations. The Administrator has held that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with4. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121 Would N ot Adversely Affect Safety. applicable regulations would ensure safe operations, stating as follows:
In Exemption No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to conducting operations for the purpose of motion picture filming (or similar operations), the PI C must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 GFR 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot including at least 10 hours logged as a UAS pilot with a multi

- rotor UAS. Prior to operations under Exemption No. 11062, the
PI C must also have accumulated and logged a minimum of 5 hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the exemption. For clarification, the FAA considers these minimum hour requirements to be inclusive rather than additive; i.e. 5 hours make and model time may be included in the 10 hours of multi

- rotor time and the 10 hours may be included in the total 25 hours of UAS rotorcraft time. In addition to the hour requirements, the
PI C must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). The FAA finds that at a minimum, the flight

- hour requirements in Exemption No. 11062 are appropriate to practice and build proficiency in the skills necessary to safely conduct the petitioner’s pro posed operations. The FAA also finds that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would satisfy this requirement. Training, proficiency, and experience

- building flights can also be conducted under the grant of exemption to accomplish the required flight time. During training, proficiency, and experience

- building flights the PI C is required to operate the UA with appropriate distances in accordance with 14 G.F.R 91.119.

3. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.7(a) will be maintained because prior to every flight, BROCK JARKA will ensure that the DJI Pha ntom 2 UAS is in an airworthy condition based upon the UAS’ compliance with its operating documents
and as stated in the conditions and limitations herein.

Additionally, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.7(a) specific to UAS,
in circums tances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.121 will be maintained because

the altitude information of the DJI Phantom 2 UA will be provided to the PIC via GPS equipment and a radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path and altitude. This altitude information, combined with BROCK JARKA ’s operation of the DJI Phantom 2 UA within visual line of sight, at or below 500 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. The altitude information will be generated by GPS equipment installed onboard the aircraft. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude initiation point is automatically established by the UASs at ground level.
The FAA has previously granted rel ief from Section 91.121 specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption
Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 1115 9, 11160, 11161).

5. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

A grant of this exemption would ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b) as a result of (1) t he technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS; (2) the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and (3) the location of the proposed flight operations. Accordingly, BROCK JARKA will ensure that it will safely operate the battery

- powered DJI Ph antom 2 UA during daylight hours in VFR conditions, with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 13.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes.

Here, as in Ex emption No. 11109, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS, the limitations on the proposed flight operations, and the location of the proposed operations, will ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b). Furthermore, safety will be ensured as the DJI Phantom 2 UAS provides audible and visual warnings to the PIC at the GCS when the UA experiences low battery voltage, the first warning occurring at approximately 33% remaining battery power, and again at appr oximately 10% remaining battery power. At the critically low battery level, the DJI Phantom 2 UAS will descend and land automatically.

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Section 91 .151 establish that safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are considered. Relief has been granted for manned aircraft to operate at less than the minimums prescribed in Section 91.151, including Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and 10650. Moreover, the FAA has previously granted relieffrom Section 91.151 specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to

those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 8811, 10808, 10673, 11042, 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

6. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

In seeking this exemption, BROCK JARKA submits that the equivalent level of safety with
reg ard to the regulatory maintenance and alteration requirements established by Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) will be met because BROCK JARKA will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or
p reventive maintenance on the UASs using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e. The Monthly Maintenance Log and DJI Phantom 2 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, BROCK JARKA will document and maintain all maintenanc e records for the DJI Phantom 2 UAS.

Since the DJI Phantom 2 UAS will be inspected as prescribed by the operating documents, BROCK JARKA will maintain the equivalent level of safety established by Sections 91.405(a), 91 .409(a)(1), and 91 .409(a)(2). A cop y of the DJI Phantom 2 User Manual is attached hereto as Appendix A; a copy of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS Maintenance LOG is attached hereto as Appendix B.

Likewise, the exemption sought will not adversely affect safety because BROCK
JARKA will use trained tech nicians to perform maintenance, alterations or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed by the operating documents.
Furthermore, the exemption sought would maintain an equivalent level of safety established by Sections 91.407, 91.417(a) and 91.417(b), because all maintenance of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS will be performed by trained technicians. Maintenance will be documented and maintained utilizing the monthly maintenance log.
Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) establish that safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are considered.In consideration of BROCK JARKA ’s proposed operating limitations, the operating

documents, and the technical aspects of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS, BROCK JARKA submits that safety will not be adversely affected by granting exemption fro m 14 C.F.R. Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1) and (a)(2), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b). The FAA has previously granted relief specific to UAS in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11 063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

7. The FAA May Prescribe Any Other Conditions For Safe Operation.

In acco rdance with Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16 entitled Special Conditions, BROCK JARKA requests that the FAA prescribe special conditions for the intended operation of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS, which cont ain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7 (a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a) (1) & (a)(2), and 91 .41 7(a) & (b). Such special conditions will permit safe operation of the UA for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States for compensation or hire. FMRA Section 333 sets for th the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification in ac cordance with any requirements that must be established for the safe operation of the UAS in the
NAS.

Likewise, the Administrator may prescribe special conditions pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, for operation of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS, since the airworthines s regulations of 14 C.F.R. Part 21 do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards, due to the novel or unusual design features of the aircraft. Section 21.16, entitled Special Conditions, states the following:

If the FAA finds that the airworthine ss regulations of this subchapter do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller because of a novel or unusual design feature of the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller, he prescribes special condi tions and amendments thereto for the product. The special conditions are issued in accordance with Part 11 of this chapter and contain such safety standards for the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller as the FAA finds necessary to establish a level of s afety equivalent to that established in the regulations.See 14 C.F.R. § 21.16.

Therefore, in accordance with FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, the FAA may prescribe special conditions for Leading Edge’s intended operation of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS, which contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151 (b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91 .41 7(a) & (b).A Summary That Can Be Published In The Federal Register, stating: The Rules From Which BROCK JARKA Seeks Exemption:

BROCK JARKA s eeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a)&(b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

A Brief Description Of The Nature Of The Exemption BROCK
JARKA Seeks:

This exemption will permit BROCK JARKA to commercially operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States.Any Additional Information, Views, Or Arguments Available To Support BROCK JARKA ’s Request.

This Petition is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012

(FM RA) Section 333, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to determine if certain UAS may operat e safely in the NAS. As such, BROCK JARKA ’s request for exemption may be granted pursuant to the authority of FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, as set forth above.
FM RA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS
will creat e a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate
without airworthiness certification.

As discussed in detail above, BROCK JARKA will operate the DJI P hantom 2 UAS safely in the NAS, without creating a hazard to users of the NAS, or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security.

Listed in Appendix C is a link to a brief article outlining the environmental
benefits of commercial use of a UAS

.CONCLUSION

As set forth herein, BROCK JARKA seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.61 and Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will permit safe operation of the DJI Phantom 2 UAS commercially, without an airworthiness certificate, for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States. By granting this Petition , the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, while also advancing the interests of the public, by allowing BROCK JARKA to safely, efficiently, and economically operate the DJI Phantom 2 UAS commercially within the NAS.

WHEREFORE , in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, BROCK JARKA respectfully requests that the Administrator grant this Petition for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and permit BROCK JARKA to operate the DJI Phantom 2 UAS commercially for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States.

Dated: June 23rd , 2015
Respectfully submitted,

BROCK JAR K A

BROCK JARKA

1865 Willowcreek Rd

Portage, IN 46368

219

- 851

- 8201 bjarka@songernet.comApendix

A. DJI Phantom 2 User M anualC. Link to a Supportive Article http://rotordronemag.com/can

- drones

- save - planet/ B. Proposed Maintenance Log

Aircraft Hours Service Date Items Needing Attention Items performed