alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) 

        Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Lan Airlines S.A. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

        The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as amended (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

| Date: December 21, 2004   |   |                                                                 |
|--------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |   | /s/ Enrique Cueto Plaza           |
|                           |   |  Name:  Enrique Cueto Plaza      Title: Chief Executive Officer |
|                           |   |                                                                 |

 

| Date: December 21, 2004   |   |                                                                        |
|--------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |   | /s/Alejandro de la Fuente Goic                                              |
|                           |   |  Name: Alejandro de la Fuente Goic      Title: Chief Financial Officer |
|                           |   |                                                                        |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

----
#### J. R. Telford et al., trading as Telford & Wilkinson, Appellees, v. T. M. Smith and Earl C. Huggins, Appellants.

(Not to he reported in full.)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Marion county; the Hon. Thomas M. Jett, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 1, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Bill by J. B. Telford and C. E. Wilkinson, trading as Telford & Wilkinson, against T. M. Smith and Earl C. Huggins to restrain defendant Smith from engaging in the business of buying, selling or shipping grain and hay and from buying or selling buggies, wagons or harness, either by himself or through an agent in the city of Kinmundy, Illinois, so long as complainants or either of them are engaged in said business in said city. From a decree granting the injunction, defendant Smith appeals.

Complainants base their right to an injunction upon a contract made between them and Smith whereby complainants wére to purchase from him his grain elevator and barn located on the right of way of a railroad company together with a lease from the railroad company under which it gave. Smith the right to maintain said buildings on the right of way. The contract also provided that Smith was to sell and complainants were to purchase a stock of wagons, buggies and harness located in a storeroom in said city. There was no dispute about the agreement to sell or that Smith was not to engage in the business of buying and selling the articles mentioned in the city of Kinmundy so long as complainants were engaged in such business at that place.

*632Charles H. Holt and W. G. Wilson, for appellants.

Noleman & Smith, for appellees.

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Contracts, § *154*
      ***
      *—when contract not to engage In business enforceable.*A contract not to engage in a business, as an inducement to buy a business, is enforceable where the limitations as to place and time are specifically mentioned.

2. Sales, § *341*
      ***
      *—when finding as to compliance with contract as to invoicing sustained by the evidence.*Where on a bill to enjoin a person from engaging in a business, where complainants based their right to an injunction on a contract for the sale of a business, containing a provision that the seller would not engage in a similar business at a certain place so long as complainants were engaged in such business, and the defendant based his right to avoid such provision of the contract on the ground that complainants had refused to invoice certain articles of personal property, *held*that a finding that the contract of purchase had been fully complied with was sustained by the evidence, there being as to such items a conflict of the oral evidence whether they were to be invoiced, and the written contract not mentioning them.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Per Curiam.
#### Minnie Holstein v. Steeplechase Park Company. Jacob Holstein v. Steeplechase Park Company.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### **CHAPTER 39—SHORE PROTECTION FROM MUNICIPAL OR COMMERCIAL WASTE**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—SHORE PROTECTION

Sec.
2601.
Definitions.
2602.
Vessel permits and numbers.
2603.
Waste handling practices.
2604.
Suspension, revocation, and injunctions.
2605.
Enforcement.
2606.
Subpena authority.
2607.
Fees.
2608.
Civil penalty procedures.
2609.
Penalties.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—RELATED PROVISIONS

2621.
Study and recommendations.
2622.
Relation to other laws.
2623.
Authorization of appropriations.
#### § 191.111 Drawback allowance.

Section 309 of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1309), provides for drawback on articles laden as supplies on certain vessels or aircraft of the United States or as supplies including equipment upon, or used in the maintenance or repair of, certain foreign vessels or aircraft.
### §1536. Crediting payments from purchases between executive agencies

(a) An advance payment made on an order under section 1535 of this title is credited to a special working fund that the Secretary of the Treasury considers necessary to be established. Except as provided in this section, any other payment is credited to the appropriation or fund against which charges were made to fill the order.

(b) An amount paid under section 1535 of this title may be expended in providing goods or services or for a purpose specified for the appropriation or fund credited. Where goods are provided from stocks on hand, the amount received in payment is credited so as to be available to replace the goods unless—

(1) another law authorizes the amount to be credited to some other appropriation or fund; or

(2) the head of the executive agency filling the order decides that replacement is not necessary, in which case, the amount received is deposited in the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts.

(c) This section does not affect other laws about working funds.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 934.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1536(a) | 31:686(b)(1st, 2d sentences). | May 21, 1920, ch. 194, §7(b), 41 Stat. 613; restated June 30, 1932, ch. 314, §601, 47 Stat. 418. |
| 1536(b) | 31:686(b)(3d, last sentences). | |
| 1536(c) | 31:686b(c)(related to 31:686). | June 30, 1932, ch. 314, §602(c)(related to §601), 47 Stat. 418. |

In subsection (b), the words "providing goods or services" are substituted for "furnishing the materials, supplies, or equipment, or in performing the work or services" to eliminate unnecessary words.
§ 250.303 Availability of results. ( a ) Each agency will make the results of its annual survey available to the public and post the results on its Web site unless the agency head determines that doing so would jeopardize or negatively impact national security. The posted survey results will include the following: ( 1 ) The agency's evaluation of its survey results;
( 2 ) How the survey was conducted;
( 3 ) Description of the employee sample, unless all employees are surveyed;
( 4 ) The survey questions and response choices with the prescribed questions identified;
( 5 ) The number of employees surveyed and number of employees who completed the survey; and
( 6 ) The number of respondents for each survey question and each response choice.
( b ) Data must be collected by December 31 of each calendar year. Each agency must post the beginning and ending dates of its employee survey and either the survey results described in paragraph (a) of this section, or a statement noting the decision not to post, no later than 120 days after the agency completes survey administration. OPM may extend this date under unusual circumstances.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-018 February 1, 2005

NRC SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON REVISED GUIDELINES FOR NUCLEAR POWER

PLANT LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment on three draft documents

containing guidance for nuclear power plant licensees in submitting applications to the agency for

renewal of plant operating licenses.

The draft documents are intended to apply lessons learned from earlier license renewal reviews

and analyses of the effects of aging on plant systems, and to clarify the agency’s expectations regarding

information to be submitted in renewal applications. The NRC staff will hold a public workshop March

2 at NRC headquarters in Rockville, Md., to discuss the draft documents and receive additional public

comment.

The draft documents are 1) Draft Regulatory Guide 1140, “Standard Format and Content for

Applications to Renew Nuclear Power Plant Operating Licenses”; 2) a revision of NUREG-1800,

“Standard Review Plan for the Review of License Renewal Applications for Nuclear Power Plants”;

and 3) a revision of NUREG-1801, “Generic Aging Lessons Learned (GALL) Report.”

The documents are available on the NRC’s Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/guidance/updated-guidance.html .

The public workshop will be held March 2, from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., in the Commissioners’

Conference Room (O-1F16) at NRC Headquarters, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike,

Rockville, Md. Members of the public are invited to attend and participate throughout the workshop.

Public comments will be accepted through March 30 and should be addressed to Chief, Rules

and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of Administration, Mailstop T6D59, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001. Comments may also be

submitted by e-mail to NRCREP@nrc.gov .

###
§ 2418.11 How will the FLRA use tax-refund offset to collect an FLRA debt? ( a ) *Tax-refund offset.* In most cases, the Financial Management Service uses the Treasury Offset Program to collect FLRA debts by the offset of tax refunds and other Federal payments. See § 2418.9(c). If not already transferred to the Financial Management Service under § 2418.9, the FLRA will refer to the Treasury Offset Program any past-due, legally enforceable debt for collection by tax-refund offset. See 26 U.S.C. 6402(d), 31 U.S.C. 3720A and 31 CFR 285.2.
( b ) *Notice.* At least sixty (60) days before referring a debt to the Treasury Offset Program, the FLRA will send notice to the debtor in accordance with the requirements of § 2418.4. The FLRA will certify to the Financial Management Service's Treasury Offset Program, in writing, that the debt is past due and legally enforceable in the amount submitted and that the FLRA has made reasonable efforts to obtain payment of the debt as described in 31 CFR 285.2(d). In addition, the FLRA will certify its compliance with all applicable due-process and other requirements described in this part and other Federal laws. See 31 U.S.C. 3720A(b) and 31 CFR 285.2.
( c ) *Administrative review.* The notice described in § 2418.4 shall provide the debtor with at least 60 days prior to the initiation of tax-refund offset to request an administrative review as described in § 2418.10(c). The FLRA may suspend collection through tax-refund offset and/or other collection actions pending the resolution of the debtor's dispute.
Order entered March 21, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01369
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF M .K.M., A CHILD On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 17
- 12692



### O RDER By order dated February 12, 2019, we directed court reporter Elizabeth Neve Griffin to file either the reporter’s record of the October 29, 2018 trial or written verification she had filed in the tri al court a contest to appellant’s declaration of inability to pay and a statement as to the
status of the contest

. To date, Ms. Griffin has not responded. As it appears a contest was not filed, we ORDER Ms. Griffin to file the record without prepayment of costs no later than April 5, 2019

. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Sandra Jackson, Presiding Judge of the 302 nd Judicial District Court; Ms. Griffin; and, the parties.
/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
### §658g. Clarification of application

#### (a) In general

This part applies to any bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report that reauthorizes appropriations, or that amends existing authorizations of appropriations, to carry out any statute, or that otherwise amends any statute, only if enactment of the bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report—

(1) would result in a net reduction in or elimination of authorization of appropriations for Federal financial assistance that would be provided to State, local, or tribal governments for use for the purpose of complying with any Federal intergovernmental mandate, or to the private sector for use to comply with any Federal private sector mandate, and would not eliminate or reduce duties established by the Federal mandate by a corresponding amount; or

(2) would result in a net increase in the aggregate amount of direct costs of Federal intergovernmental mandates or Federal private sector mandates other than as described in paragraph (1).

#### (b) Direct costs

#### (1) In general

For purposes of this part, the direct cost of the Federal mandates in a bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report that reauthorizes appropriations, or that amends existing authorizations of appropriations, to carry out a statute, or that otherwise amends any statute, means the net increase, resulting from enactment of the bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report, in the amount described under paragraph (2)(A) over the amount described under paragraph (2)(B).

#### (2) Amounts

The amounts referred to under paragraph (1) are—

(A) the aggregate amount of direct costs of Federal mandates that would result under the statute if the bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report is enacted; and

(B) the aggregate amount of direct costs of Federal mandates that would result under the statute if the bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report were not enacted.

#### (3) Extension of authorization of appropriations

For purposes of this section, in the case of legislation to extend authorization of appropriations, the authorization level that would be provided by the extension shall be compared to the authorization level for the last year in which authorization of appropriations is already provided.

(Pub. L. 93–344, title IV, §428, as added Pub. L. 104–4, title I, §101(a)(2), Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 59.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, or on the date 90 days after appropriations are made available as authorized under section 1516 of this title, whichever is earlier, and applicable to legislation considered on and after such date, see section 110 of Pub. L. 104–4, set out as a note under section 1511 of this title.
#### Beck Chemical Equipment Corporation, Appellant, v. Beattie Manufacturing Company, Respondent.

Ho opinion. Present — Martin, P. J.,' Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          34,620
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,229
<ALLOWANCES>                                       405
<INVENTORY>                                     25,566
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,254
<PP&E>                                          84,606
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,450
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 157,028
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,977
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           162
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,906
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   157,028
<SALES>                                        169,016
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               169,016
<CGS>                                          103,724
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  103,724
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,631
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,335)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,996
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,349
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,647
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,647
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Young America Films, Inc., and Transfilm Incorporated.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals or for reargument and for a stay denied, with $10 costs. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 852.]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40581

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN OLIVARES-ESTRADA, also known as Enrique Olivera, also known as 

Juan Olivares,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:14-CR-729-1

Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Juan Olivares-Estrada has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Olivares-Estrada has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 15, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40581 Document: 00513308591 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/15/2015
No. 15-40581

2

Olivares-Estrada’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-40581 Document: 00513308591 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/15/2015
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 27, 2009 

p0324 

Order 

 

March 27, 2009 

137577 

 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137577 

 COA: 286782 

Oakland CC: 2007-216738-FH 

VINCENT SCOTT RICHARDS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 10, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of 

People v Idziak (Docket No. 137301) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the 

decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to 

appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in 

that case.
### SUBCHAPTER VI—DESIGNATION OF LANDS UNSUITABLE FOR NONCOAL MINING
§ 2422.25 When does the Region tally the ballots? ( a ) *Tallying the ballots.* When the election is concluded, the Regional Director will tally the ballots.
( b ) *Service of the tally.* When the tally is completed, the Regional Director will serve the tally of ballots on the parties in accordance with the election agreement or direction of election.
( c ) *Valid ballots cast.* Representation will be determined by the majority of the valid ballots cast.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-03-035 August 8, 2003

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO CONDUCT SPECIAL INSPECTION

AT DIABLO CANYON

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will begin a special inspection August 11 to

evaluate the failure of battery chargers at the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant, located near

San Luis Obispo, California.

During a 15-month period, there were three battery charger failures at Unit 1 and three

failures at Unit 2. The problem has been corrected.

The chargers provide DC power to various safety related and non-safety related systems

and equipment throughout the plant. If the chargers are unavailable, batteries can only supply

DC power for up to eight hours.

The NRC’s Special Inspection Team, consisting of a resident inspector and senior reactor

engineer from the NRC’s Region IV office in Arlington, Texas, will evaluate the adequacy of the

licensee’s response to the battery charger failures, their root cause evaluation, and corrective

actions. The inspection will take about one week.

The inspection report, will be issued about four weeks after the inspection, and will be

available on the agency's web site and through its Electronic Reading Room at

http://www.nrc.gov as an Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS)

document. Help in using ADAMS is available through the NRC Public Document Room at

301/415-4737 or 800/397-4209.

###
#### §§ 1850.131-1850.139 [Reserved]