alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 27, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23976]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel, Translational Research in Behavioral Science.
    Date: November 16, 2004.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Bettina D. Acuna, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute 
of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., 
Room 6154, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, 301-443-1340, 
[email protected].

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel, Research Infrastructure.
    Date: November 22, 2004.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Churchill Hotel, 1914 Connecticut Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20090.
    Contact Person: Martha Ann Carey, PhD, RN, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute 
of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., 
Room 6151, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, 301-443-1606, 
[email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 19, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-23976 Filed 10-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 133

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 1993 increase 

in income taxes on Social Security benefits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Mr. KING of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the 1993 increase in income taxes on Social Security benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF 1993 INCREASE IN TAX ON SOCIAL 

4 SECURITY BENEFITS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 86(a) of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to social se7 curity and tier 1 railroad retirement benefits) is amended 

8 by adding at the end the following new sentence: 

9 ‘‘This paragraph shall not apply to any taxable year 

10 beginning after December 31, 2002.’’
2

•HR 133 IH 

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

2 (1) Paragraph (3) of section 871(a) of such 

3 Code is amended by striking ‘‘85 percent’’ in sub4 paragraph (A) and inserting ‘‘50 percent’’. 

5 (2)(A) Subparagraph (A) of section 121(e)(1) 

6 of the Social Security Amendments of 1983 (Public 

7 Law 98–21) is amended—

8 (i) by striking ‘‘(A) There’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘There’’; 

10 (ii) by striking ‘‘(i)’’ immediately following 

11 ‘‘amounts equivalent to’’; and 

12 (iii) by striking ‘‘, less (ii)’’ and all that 

13 follows and inserting a period. 

14 (B) Paragraph (1) of section 121(e) of such Act 

15 is amended by striking subparagraph (B). 

16 (C) Paragraph (3) of section 121(e) of such Act 

17 is amended by striking subparagraph (B) and by re18 designating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (B). 

19 (D) Paragraph (2) of section 121(e) of such 

20 Act is amended in the first sentence by striking 

21 ‘‘paragraph (1)(A)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1)’’. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

24 December 31, 2002.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.28

(ALLIED CAPITAL LOGO)
                                                    1919 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
                                                    Washington, DC 20006-3434

                                                    202-331-1112
                                                    202-659-2053 Fax
December 10, 2003


Mr. Joseph A. Czyzyk
President and CEO
Mercury Air Group, Inc.
5456 McConnell Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90066

Dear Mr. Czyzyk:

      Mercury Air Group, Inc. (the "Seller"), Mercury Air Centers, Inc. (the
"Company") and Allied Capital Corporation ("Allied") hereby agree to amend the
Stock Purchase Agreement dated October 28, 2003 among the Seller, the Company
and Allied (the "SPA") to reflect the following:

      1.  Each reference to "December 31, 2003" in Sections 1.4(a), 5.2(a),
10.1(b) and 10.1(j) of the SPA shall be changed to "January 16, 2004."

      2.  The reference to "45th day" in the second sentence of Section 9.1 of
the SPA shall be changed to "62nd day."

      3.  Each reference to "December 19, 2003" in Section 9.2(b) of the SPA
shall be changed to "January 12, 2004."

      4.  Each reference to "March 31, 2004" in Sections 1.4(a), 1.4(b),
10.1(b) and 10.1(i) of the SPA shall be changed to "April 16, 2004."

      5.  Environmental Disclosure #10 (Anaheim) on the next to last page
attached to Schedule 2.18(d) of the SPA shall be deleted in its entirety.

      Except as set forth herein, the SPA shall remain unchanged and in full
force and effect.

      Please acknowledge your acceptance of the foregoing terms by executing a
copy of this letter and returning it to Allied as soon as possible.

                                              Sincerely yours,

                                              ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION



                                              By:    /s/ Daniel L. Russell
                                                     ---------------------------
                                              Name:  Daniel L. Russell
                                                     ---------------------------
                                              Title: Principal
                                                     ---------------------------



                                                           www.alliedcapital.com

<PAGE>
[ALLIED CAPITAL LOGO]                               1919 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
                                                    Washington, DC 20006-3434

                                                    202-331-1112
                                                    202-659-2053 Fax

ACCEPTED AND AGREED AS OF THE DATE SET FORTH ABOVE:


MERCURY AIR GROUP, INC.


By:  /s/ Joseph A. Czyzyk
   ----------------------
Name: Joseph A. Czyzyk
     --------------------
Title: CEO
      -------------------


MERCURY AIR CENTERS, INC.

By:  /s/ Joseph A. Czyzyk
   ----------------------
Name: Joseph A. Czyzyk
     --------------------
Title: CEO
      -------------------


























                                       2
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-019 February 26, 2001

NRC ISSUES SAFETY EVALUATION CONCLUDING SUMMER PLANT

CAN SAFELY RESUME OPERATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued its safety evaluation associated with

reactor coolant system pipe cracks identified at the Summer nuclear power plant near Jenkinsville,

South Carolina. Although NRC approval is not required prior to plant restart, the staff has concluded

that the licensee has identified the root cause of the problem, made effective repairs, and the plant can

safely resume operation for approximately 18 months.

After South Carolina Electric and Gas shut the plant down for a scheduled refueling outage in

early October, workers noticed traces of boron beneath a large pipe inside the containment building.

This indicated leakage of reactor cooling water containing the boron from the area of the pipe.

Subsequent tests indicated a crack in a weld. The damaged section was removed and replaced.

The safety evaluation report, “Integrity Evaluation for Future Operation: Virgil C. Summer

Nuclear Plant Reactor Vessel Nozzle To Pipe Weld Regions,” discusses the NRC’s review of the

repairs and the potential impact of other small weld defects discovered after shutdown.

A copy of the safety evaluation report is available in the NRC Public Document Room, 11555

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, telephone: 301/415-4737. A copy also will be available at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/REACTOR/SUMMER/index.htm on the NRC’s web site under the heading:

“Correspondence,” and through ADAMS, the Agencywide Documents Access and Management

System.

###
§ 1400.101 Purpose. ( a ) This part sets forth certain requirements and procedures which each agency shall observe for determining national security positions pursuant to Executive Order 10450—Security Requirements for Government Employment (April 27, 1953), 3 CFR 1949-1953 Comp., p. 936.
( b ) All positions must be evaluated for a position sensitivity designation commensurate with the responsibilities and assignments of the position as they relate to the impact on the national security, including but not limited to eligibility for access to classified information.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—CLOSING ACCOUNTS
### §§155 to 159. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–591, §8(a), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3435

Section 155, act June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §1, 30 Stat. 96, defined "sailing vessel", "steam vessel", and "under way".

Section 156, act June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §1, 30 Stat. 96, defined "visible".

Section 157, acts June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §2, 30 Stat. 102; May 25, 1914, ch. 98, 38 Stat. 381; June 30, 1932, ch. 314, pt. II, title V, §§501, 502(b), 47 Stat. 415; May 27, 1936, ch. 463, §1, 49 Stat. 1380; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §§101–104, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7875, 60 Stat 1097; May 21, 1948, ch. 328, §3, 62 Stat. 249; Aug. 14, 1958, Pub. L. 85–656, §1, 72 Stat. 612, provided for promulgation of special rules by the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating, and covered publication of rules and hearings in connection therewith. See section 2071 of this title.

Section 157a, Pub. L. 88–163, Oct. 30, 1963, 77 Stat. 281, provided for regulations for navigation or operation under bridges over navigable waters.

Section 158, acts June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §3, 30 Stat. 102; May 21, 1948, ch. 328, §3, 62 Stat. 249; Aug. 14, 1958, Pub. L. 85–656, §1, 72 Stat. 612, set out penalties for violations by pilots, engineers, mates, or masters. See section 2072 of this title.

Section 159, acts June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §4, 30 Stat. 103; May 21, 1948, ch. 328, §3, 62 Stat. 249; Aug. 14, 1958, Pub. L. 85–656, §1, 72 Stat. 612, provided for a penalty for violations by vessels. See section 2072 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Dec. 24, 1981, see section 7 of Pub. L. 96–591, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 1604 of this title.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6441

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

TERRENCE J. WHITE, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Leonie M. Brinkema, District 

Judge. (3:01-cr-00190-LMB-1) 

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 5, 2009 

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Terrence J. White, Appellant Pro Se. John Staige Davis, V, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Terrence J. White appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for writ of audita querela. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

White, No. 3:01-cr-00190-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 18, 2009). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-04-051 September 21, 2004

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC STAFF AND DUKE ENERGY TO DISCUSS CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 

FOR TWO OCONEE NUCLEAR PLANT WHITE FINDINGS

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will meet with Duke Energy management at 10:30

a.m. on Monday, October 4, at the Oconee nuclear plant site, 155 E. Pickens Highway in Seneca, S.C.,

to discuss a supplemental inspection which examined the company’s corrective actions associated with

two earlier findings.

The meeting will be open to public observation, and NRC officials will be available prior to the

close of the meeting to answer questions from interested observers.

The supplemental inspection, conducted in August, was performed to assess the licensee’s

problem identification, root cause evaluation, extent of condition determination and corrective actions

associated with two white findings in the mitigating systems cornerstone of the NRC oversight

program. The white findings involved the inadequate installation of some electrical connectors on a

Unit 3 pump and potential problems with the pressurizers for all three Oconee units. A "white" finding

on the agency’s "green, white, yellow, red" safety significance scale, means the issue is considered to

have a low to moderate impact on plant safety.

“The plant continues to be operated safely and we’re satisfied the company has addressed the

deficiencies,” said Len Wert, NRC Region II Deputy Director of the Division of Reactor Projects, “but

we want to hear what they have to say about what our inspectors saw as a lack of thoroughness in their

corrective action process as it related to these findings.”

Additional details on the white findings and supplemental inspection are available from the

NRC public affairs office in Region II or through the agency’s ADAMS document system at

www.nrc.gov./reading-rm/adams.html . Help in using ADAMS is available by contacting the NRC

Public Document Room at 301-415-4737 or 1-800-397-4209.

###
§ 2423.2 What Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) services does the OGC provide? ( a ) *Purpose of ADR services.* The Office of the General Counsel furthers its mission and implements the agency-wide Federal Labor Relations Authority Collaboration and Alternative Dispute Resolution Program by promoting stable and productive labor-management relationships governed by the Statute and by providing services that assist labor organizations and agencies, on a voluntary basis, to: ( 1 ) Develop collaborative labor-management relationships;
( 2 ) Avoid unfair labor practice disputes; and
( 3 ) Informally resolve unfair labor practice disputes.
( b ) *Types of ADR Services.* Agencies and labor organizations may jointly request, or agree to, the provision of the following services by the Office of the General Counsel: ( 1 ) *Facilitation.* Assisting the parties in improving their labor-management relationship as governed by the Statute;
( 2 ) *Intervention.* Intervening when parties are experiencing or expect significant unfair labor practice disputes;
( 3 ) *Training.* Training labor organization officials and agency representatives on their rights and responsibilities under the Statute and how to avoid litigation over those rights and responsibilities, and on using problem-solving and ADR skills, techniques, and strategies to resolve informally unfair labor practice disputes; and
( 4 ) *Education.* Working with the parties to recognize the benefits of, and establish processes for, avoiding unfair labor practice disputes, and resolving any unfair labor practice disputes that arise by consensual, rather than adversarial, methods.
( c ) *ADR services after initiation of an investigation.* As part of processing an unfair labor practice charge, the Office of the General Counsel may suggest to the parties, as appropriate, that they may benefit from these ADR services.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin E. Franklin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Martin E. Franklin 
|Martin E. Franklin     
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 9, 2005         



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Jarden Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ian G.H. Ashken, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Ian G.H. Ashken    
|Ian G.H. Ashken        
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 9, 2005
§ 2422.14 What is the effect of your withdrawal or the Regional Director's dismissal of a petition? ( a ) *Withdrawal/dismissal less than sixty (60) days before contract expiration.* ( 1 ) If you withdraw a timely filed petition seeking an election, or the Regional Director dismisses the petition less than sixty (60) days before the existing agreement between the incumbent exclusive representative and the agency or activity expires, or any time after the agreement expires, another petition that seeks an election will not be considered timely if filed within a ninety (90) day period beginning with either: ( i ) The date on which the Regional Director approves the withdrawal; or
( ii ) The date on which the Regional Director dismisses the petition when the Authority does not receive an application for review; or
( iii ) The date on which the Authority rules on an application for review.
( 2 ) Other pending petitions that have been timely filed under this part will continue to be processed.
( b ) *Withdrawal by petitioner.* If you submit a withdrawal request for a petition seeking an election that the Regional Director receives after the notice of hearing issues or after approval of an election agreement, whichever occurs first, you will be barred from filing another petition seeking an election for the same unit or any subdivision of the unit for six (6) months from the date on which the Regional Director approves the withdrawal.
( c ) *Withdrawal by incumbent.* When an election is not held because the incumbent disclaims any representation interest in a unit, an incumbent's petition seeking an election involving the same unit or a subdivision of the same unit will be considered untimely if filed within six (6) months of cancellation of the election.