alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST II
                                Exhibit 99.1
                                ------------
                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Swanson, Chief Executive Officer of Ridgewood Electric Power Trust II.
(the "Registrant"),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended
June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d));
and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 10, 2003

                                       Signature:

                                       /s/ Robert Swanson
                                       -----------------------
                                       Robert Swanson
                                       Chief Executive Officer
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-01-043 August 8, 2001

CONTACT: Breck Henderson 

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

RICHARD W. DEESE NAMED NRC RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION

The U.S. Nulear Regulatory Commission has named Richard W. Deese to the post of resident

inspector at the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station near Port Gibson, Miss. Mr. Deese joins senior resident

inspector Timothy Hoeg.

Mr. Deese received a bachelorís degree in mechanical engineering, with honors, from North

Carolina State University in 1986. Following college, he worked at Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory,

one of the U.S. Navyís primary contractors for nuclear engineering support, for more than 12 years. 

He worked as a nuclear plant engineer and instructor at Navy submarine nuclear prototype reactors in

Idaho and at a nuclear training ship in Charleston, South Carolina. He also worked as a shipyard

engineering resident in Newport News, Virginia, during the refueling, construction and acceptance

testing of nuclear powered aircraft carriers.

Since joining the NRC in 1999, Mr. Deese has served as a reactor inspector in the Engineering

and Maintenance Branch of Division of Reactor Safety at Region IV in Arlington, Texas. Mr. Deese,

his wife Stephanie and their four children will reside in Vicksburg.

###
#### Mary Marshall, Respondent, v. Matthew Marshall, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-01-011 May 31, 2001 

 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov 

 

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING WITH FP&L JUNE 8 TO DISCUSS

 INITIAL PLANT LICENSE RENEWAL INSPECTION AT TURKEY POINT

 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will meet with Florida Power & Light management at

 9:00 a.m. (edt) on Friday, June 8, at the Turkey Point nuclear power plant to discuss the results of the

agencyís initial inspection of the plantís license renewal program.

 The meeting will be open to public observation and will be held in Room 123 of the Turkey Point

Nuclear Training Building, located at the site.

 NRC officials said the inspection was the first of three planned license renewal reviews at Turkey

Point and was conducted to verify that the companyís license renewal program is implemented

consistent with its license renewal application and pertinent regulations. Subsequent NRC inspections

will verify that programs are in place to manage the material condition of the plantís systems,

structures and components.

 NRC officials will discuss the license renewal process and the schedule for Turkey Point.

###
§ 1620.20 Scope. ( a ) This subpart applies to: ( 1 ) A justice or judge of the United States as defined in 28 U.S.C. 451;
( 2 ) A bankruptcy judge appointed under 28 U.S.C. 152 or a United States magistrate judge appointed under 28 U.S.C. 631 who has chosen to receive a judges' annuity described at 28 U.S.C. 377 or section 2(c) of the Retirement and Survivors' Annuities for Bankruptcy Judges and Magistrates Act of 1988, Public Law 100-659, 102 Stat. 3910-3921;
( 3 ) A judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims appointed under 28 U.S.C. 171 whose retirement is covered by 28 U.S.C. 178; and
( 4 ) A judge of the Court of Veterans Appeals appointed under 38 U.S.C. 7253.
( b ) This subpart does not apply to a bankruptcy judge or a United States magistrate judge who has not chosen a judges' annuity, or to a judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims who is not covered by 28 U.S.C. 178. Those individuals may participate in the TSP only if they are otherwise covered by CSRS or FERS.
[64 FR 31057, June 9, 1999, as amended at 70 FR 32213, June 1, 2005]
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


LEV
      PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


FORM
      10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I
      am the Chief Financial Officer of Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the “Company”). I am delivering this certificate in connection with
      the Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 and filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form 10-KSB”).





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
      the Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
      in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March
              31, 2006
            By:
            /s/
              Douglas J. BeckDouglas
                J. Beck
              Chief
                Financial Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

WILLIE JAY YOUNG

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 385

[ April 23, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Charles A. Schwab

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562013CF000798A

.

Willie Jay Young, Raiford, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, M AY and K LING ENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

PLANET POLYMER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES
AS OF JUNE 30, 1998



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Three months ended June 30,        Six months ended June 30,
                                                    ---------------------------       --------------------------
                                                       1998             1997             1998             1997
                                                    ---------        ---------        ---------        ---------
<S>                                                 <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>      
Shares outstanding at beginning of period           5,271,269        5,271,269        5,271,269        5,271,269
    7,337 shares issued on December 15, 1997            7,337               --            7,337               --
    21,538 shares accrued December 31, 1997            21,538               --           21,538               --
                                                    ---------        ---------        ---------        ---------
Weighted average number of shares                   5,300,144        5,271,269        5,300,144        5,271,269
                                                                     =========                         =========
    10,169 shares issued on March 15, 1998             10,169                             3,978
    8,695 shares issued on June 15, 1998                1,433                               721
                                                    ---------                         ---------
Weighted average number of shares                   5,311,746                         5,304,842
                                                    =========                         =========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE 8/31/99 AGRIBRANDS  INTERNATIONAL,
INC.  BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                          174,500
<SECURITIES>                    3,500
<RECEIVABLES>                   88,400
<ALLOWANCES>                    11,400
<INVENTORY>                     81,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                340,900
<PP&E>                          346,300
<DEPRECIATION>                  172,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  566,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           154,500
<BONDS>                         11,500
<COMMON>                        100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      373,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    566,200
<SALES>                         1,261,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,261,500
<CGS>                           1,050,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,050,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                128,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                3,600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              8,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 70,400
<INCOME-TAX>                    26,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             44,000
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    44,000
<EPS-BASIC>                     4.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                   4.11


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 23.0

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Local Financial Corporation:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-59116) on Form S-8 of Local Financial Corporation of our report dated
February 1, 2002, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial
condition of Local Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2001, which report appears in the December 31, 2001,
annual report on Form 10-K of Local Financial Corporation.


                                                                KPMG LLP

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
March 1, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED,

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Multimedia Games, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Clifton E. Lind, Chief Executive Officer, and Craig S. Nouis, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that, based upon each of their respective knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 9, 2005 |  | /s/ Clifton E. Lind    
|                     |  | Clifton E. Lind        
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                     | 
|                     |  | /s/ Craig S. Nouis     
|                     |  | Craig S. Nouis         
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Multimedia Games, Inc. and will be retained by Multimedia Games, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


              CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
          PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C.
                                  SECTION 1350.

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Penwest
Pharmaceuticals Co. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Jennifer L. Good, Vice President, Finance and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  March 14, 2005
                                          /s/ Jennifer L. Good
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Jennifer L. Good
                                          Vice President, Finance and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
### §1924. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–145, §5(a)(2)(A), Mar. 4, 2010, 124 Stat. 53

Section, Pub. L. 92–184, ch. IV, Dec. 15, 1971, 85 Stat. 636; Pub. L. 93–245, ch. VI, §600, Jan. 3, 1974, 87 Stat. 1079; Pub. L. 93–554, title I, ch. III, Dec. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1777; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §221(10), (11), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1750, related to emergency duty overtime pay from funds disbursed by the Chief Administrative Officer.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 206b of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

Subsecs. (a) to (f) of this section were based on section 3 of H. Res. No. 449, Ninety-second Congress, June 2, 1971, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 92–184, as amended by H. Res. No. 398, Ninety-third Congress, June 4, 1973, eff. Jan. 3, 1974, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 93–245, and H. Res. No. 1309, Ninety-third Congress, Oct. 10, 1974, eff. Dec. 27, 1974, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 93–554.

Subsec. (g) of this section was based on section 3 of H. Res. No. 1309, Ninety-third Congress, Oct. 10, 1974, eff. Dec. 27, 1974, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 93–554, and was repealed by Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §221(11)(B), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1750.

As originally codified, this section consisted of two undesignated pars. based on sections 3 and 5 of H. Res. No. 449, Ninety-second Congress, June 2, 1971, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 92–184. Section 5 of H. Res. No. 449 was superseded by section 3 of H. Res. No. 1309, formerly set out as subsec. (g) of this section, and was subsequently repealed by Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §221(11)(B), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1750.
#### Lena S. Speronza, Respondent, v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company of Hartford, Appellant.

Action to recover upon an alleged contract of insurance upon the life of Peter Speronza, the husband of plaintiff. Judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ro opinion. Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ. [See *post,*p. 811.]
### §28l. Collection of mining law administration fees

In fiscal year 2009 and each fiscal year thereafter, the Bureau of Land Management shall collect from mining claim holders the mining claim maintenance fees and location fees; such fees shall be collected in the same manner as authorized by sections 28f and 28g of this title only to the extent provided in advance in appropriations Acts.

(Pub. L. 111–8, div. E, title I, Mar. 11, 2009, 123 Stat. 704; Pub. L. 111–88, div. A, title I, Oct. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 2907.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2009—Pub. L. 111–88 substituted "from mining claim holders the mining claim maintenance fees and location" for "mining law administration" and struck out "those" before "authorized".
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone 301/415-820

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. III-03-037 April 28, 2003 

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov 

 Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662

NRC PROPOSES $12,000 FINE AGAINST ST. LOUIS FIRM

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $12,000 fine against American

Radiolabeled Chemicals, St. Louis, Missouri, for deliberate violations in the oversight and

implementation of its radiation protection program. The company manufactures chemicals with

radioactive tracers which are primarily used for research.

In March and April of last year, NRC inspectors conducted a review of the

implementation of the company’s radiation protection program which included inspection of the

company’s facilities and equipment, contamination control and exposure monitoring measures,

radioactive waste and gaseous effluents management, as well as the management of public dose

measurements and controls. 

The NRC staff identified three potentially deliberate violations of NRC requirements: (1)

failure to make surveys to assure compliance with NRC regulations limiting radiation exposures

to the public; (2) failure to perform required weekly surveys of removable contamination in the

restricted and unrestricted work areas; and (3) failure to accurately record the rate of flow in

exhaust fans in the company’s work areas. 

The NRC’s Office of Investigations subsequently determined that the company had

deliberately failed to meet these NRC requirements. 

In notifying the company of the proposed fine, NRC Regional Administrator Jim Dyer

said, “Because the violations were deliberate and had potential safety consequences, the NRC

considers these violations a significant regulatory concern. It is essential that the NRC be able to

maintain the highest trust and confidence that licensees and their employees will act with

integrity and abide by requirements to protect the health and safety of workers and members of

the public.”
The amount of the fine was based on the company’s inadequate oversight of the radiation

safety program and on the deliberateness of the violations.

The company has 30 days from the receipt of the Notice of Violation to either pay the fine

or to protest it. If the fine is protested and subsequently imposed by the NRC staff, the company

may request hearing.

The letter to the company is available from the Region III Office of Public Affairs or

online at: http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/regulatory/enforcement/current.html. 

####
### §1141. Definitions

In this subchapter:

#### (1) Sea Grant Institution

The term "Sea Grant Institution" means a sea grant college or sea grant institute, as those terms are defined in section 1122 of this title.

#### (2) Tribal organization

The term "Tribal organization" has the meaning given the term "tribal organization" in section 5304 of title 25.

#### (3) Young fisherman

The term "young fisherman" means an individual who—

(A) desires to participate in the commercial fisheries of the United States, including the Great Lakes fisheries;

(B) has worked as a captain, crew member, or deckhand on a commercial fishing vessel for not more than 10 years of cumulative service; or

(C) is a beginning commercial fisherman.

(Pub. L. 116–289, §2, Jan. 5, 2021, 134 Stat. 4886.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Young Fishermen's Development Act, and not as part of titles I and II of Pub. L. 89–454 which comprise this chapter.
Editorial Note on Part 356
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 356 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

§ 356.22 Prehearing conference. ( a ) ( 1 ) If an administrative hearing has been requested, the administrative law judge will direct the parties to attend a prehearing conference to consider: ( i ) Simplification of issues;
( ii ) Obtaining stipulations of fact and of documents to avoid unnecessary proof;
( iii ) Settlement of the matter;
( iv ) Discovery; and
( v ) Such other matters as may expedite the disposition of the proceedings.
( 2 ) Any relevant and significant stipulations or admissions will be incorporated into the initial decision.
( b ) If a prehearing conference is impractical, the administrative law judge will direct the parties to correspond with each other or to confer by telephone or otherwise to achieve the purposes of such a conference.
#### Herman Rudawer, Individually and on Behalf of Bretton Footwear Corporation, Appellant, v. Joseph Lateiner et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jean Paul Roy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.

















/s/ Jean Paul Roy


------------------------


Jean Paul Roy


President and Chief Executive Officer


August 13, 2010