alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-066 June 3, 2004

NRC STAFF ISSUES BULLETIN TO NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

 ON INSPECTING CERTAIN REACTOR PIPING COMPONENTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued a Bulletin to companies licensed to

operate pressurized water reactors in the United States, requesting information on current inspection

methods of certain equipment so that NRC staff can determine if supplemental measures are needed.

Some alloys used in components of nuclear reactors are susceptible to cracking when exposed

to coolant water during normal operation. The inspections covered in the Bulletin examine

components made of those alloys that impact reactor piping, such as the sleeves for heater elements in

a reactor’s pressurizer, a device which allows coolant to remain liquid at higher temperatures. 

Experience with these components shows this issue is not an immediate safety problem.

“The NRC wants to ensure licensee inspections identify any onset of cracking in an effective

and timely manner,” said Bruce Boger, Director of the Division of Inspection Program Management in

the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

Inspections that detect through-wall leakage from the components in question, conducted at a

plant’s next refueling outage, should help licensees determine the components’ structural integrity. For

example, a visual inspection of 100 percent of each component’s circumference would be effective in

finding leakage and would satisfy the NRC.

The Bulletin requests licensees to provide a written response by July 28 on several areas of 

information, including:

-- the materials from which the components in question were fabricated;

-- the inspections that have been and will be performed to ensure any degradation of the

components is identified, properly characterized and repaired, and;

-- an explanation why the inspection program is adequate for maintaining the integrity of the

reactor’s coolant pressure boundary.

Within 60 days of restarting after the next inspection of the components described in the

Bulletin, licensees must submit one of two documents:

-- a statement of the inspections performed, the conditions found, any follow-up examinations

of flaws in leaking components, and corrective actions or repairs taken, or;
-- if the licensee could not complete the inspections, a summary of what inspections were

performed and the methods used, as well as the information required in the first option.

Bulletin 2004-01, “Inspection of Alloy 82/182/600 Materials Used in the Fabrication of

Pressurizer Penetrations and Steam Space Piping Connections at Pressurized-Water Reactors,” is

available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/gen-comm/bulletins/2004/ .

###
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10579 Summary Calendar

__________________ DANIEL CURRAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ROBERT B. REICH, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:95-CV-1158-T
- - - - - - - - - - February 21, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHE’ and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Daniel Curran appeals from two orders of the district court. This court does not have jurisdiction over the district court's order entered on June 28, 1995. See EEOC v. Kerrville Bus Co. Inc. , 925 F.2d 129, 131-33 (5th Cir. 1991). Curran challenges the district court's order, entered on June 21, 1995, which denied in part Curran's requests for injunctive relief. After a careful review of the record and the appellate arguments, weNo. 95-10579 -2- conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the requests. See White v. Carlucci , 862 F.2d 1209, 1213 (5th Cir. 1989); Parks v. Dunlop , 517 F.2d 785, 787 (5th Cir. 1975). AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, David Andrew James, Chief Financial Officer of Barbeques Galore Limited
(the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



|(1) |  | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|           
|-----------
|May 1, 2003
|           



A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Barbeques Galore Limited and will be retained by Barbeques Galore Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff, upon request.
§ 1215.9 Refunds. ( a ) The MSPB will refund promptly any amounts deducted to satisfy debts owed to the MSPB when the debt is waived, found not owed to the MSPB, or when directed by an administrative or judicial order.
( b ) The creditor agency will promptly return any amounts deducted by MSPB to satisfy debts owed to the creditor agency when the debt is waived, found not owed, or when directed by an administrative or judicial order.
( c ) Unless required by law, refunds under this subsection shall not bear interest.
### §1264. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title I, §114, as added Oct. 18, 1972, Pub. L. 92–500, §2, 86 Stat. 833, authorized the Administrator, in consultation with the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, the Secretary of Agriculture, other Federal agencies, representatives of State and local governments, and members of the public, to conduct a thorough and complete study on the need of extending Federal oversight and control in order to preserve the fragile ecology of Lake Tahoe and to report the results of this study to Congress not later than one year after Oct. 18, 1972.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

Nos. 95-11099 & 96-10217

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GARY WAYNE MINTER,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:95-CV-499-A

- - - - - - - - - -

July 18, 1997

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gary Wayne Minter appeals from the district court’s denial

of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and from the district court’s

partial grant of his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582. He argues that the district court abused its

discretion with regard to the extent of the reduction it ordered

to his sentence, that he was denied his statutory right to notice
No. 95-11099

No. 96-10217

- 2 -

of a possible sentence enhancement, that the district court erred

in its application of the sentencing guidelines, that his

sentence was calculated in violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause,

and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because

his attorney failed to object to these issues or to raise them on

direct appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED. To the extent that a certificate of

appealability is required, it is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1


                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                        Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



William F. Garrett,  the President and Chief  Executive  Officer of Delta Mills,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:

     1.   The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 2, 2005 of the
          Company, as amended by the Amendment to which this certificate is an
          exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
          section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.






Date     October 5, 2005                 By: /s/ William F. Garrett
      -------------------------          ------------------------------------
                                         William F. Garrett
                                         President & Chief Executive Officer





A signed copy of this written statement required by section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1455

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

Act to make private, nonprofit medical facilities that serve industry 

specific clients eligible for hazard mitigation and disaster assistance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2003

Mr. WAXMAN (for himself, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. SCHIFF, and Mr. SHERMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to make private, nonprofit medical 

facilities that serve industry specific clients eligible for 

hazard mitigation and disaster assistance.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 102(9) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 

4 Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122(9)) 

5 is amended by striking the period at the end and inserting 

6 the following: ‘‘and includes a facility that (A) provides 

7 medical services to a specific occupational or industry seg8 ment of the general public, and (B) is operated by an or-
2

•HR 1455 IH 

1 ganization described in subsection (c) or (d) of section 501 

2 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 501) 

3 and exempt from taxation under subsection (a) of such 

4 section.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>
 
                                                                 Exhibit 10.12.4
<PAGE>
 
NationsBank N.A.
Commercial Ranking
6610 Rock ledge Drive
Bethesda, MD 20817


NationsBank

March 23, 1999

Mr. Brad Mullinax
Chief Financial Officer
ACSYS, Inc.
75 14th Street
Suite 2200
Atlanta, GA 30309

Dear Brad:

Per your request, NationsBank has agreed to waive the step down on ACSYS, Inc.'s
Revolving Credit Facility for one year. As a result, the "Total Revolving Credit
Commitment" will remain at $40 million though April 30, 2000 as reduced from
time to time in accordance with Section 2.07 of the Credit Agreement. This is a
one-time waiver of this provision and shall not be deemed to be a waiver or
amendment of any other term or condition of the Credit Agreement, Notes or other
Loan Documents.

Sincerely,

/s/ Barbara P. Levy
-------------------------
Barbara P. Levy
Senior Vice President
Exhibit
      32.2









CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the annual report of Sunburst Acquisitions IV, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending February 28, 2005 (the
      "Report"), I, Terry Fields, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:






1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the Company's financial position and results of
      operations.


















/s/Terry Fields


Terry
      Fields, President




June
      10, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,170
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,715
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     75,551
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        199,412
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 309,181
<DEPOSITS>                                     269,226
<SHORT-TERM>                                    11,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,669
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,092
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 309,181
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,130
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,524
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   574
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                21,228
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,854
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,237
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,991
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      588
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  40
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,373
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,885
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.85
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       223
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,944
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      869
<RECOVERIES>                                       322
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,985
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,985
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,439


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-7618-7]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency.

# ACTION:

Re-publication of Notice of Proposed Settlement.

# SUMMARY:

Under section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9622(h)(1), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has entered into an Agreement with Schwerman Trucking Company concerning the T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Company Superfund Site (Site) located in Albany, Dougherty County, Georgia. This notice replaces the notice dated December 29, 2003, which incorrectly described the Agreement. EPA will consider public comments on the Agreement until March 8, 2004. EPA may withdraw from or modify the Agreement should such comments disclose facts or considerations which indicate the Agreement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. Copies of the Agreement are available from:

Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Waste Management Division, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, 404/562-8887.

Written comments may be submitted to Ms. Batchelor at the above address within thirty (30) days of the date of publication.

Dated: January 28, 2004.

Anita Davis,

Acting Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Waste Management Division.

[FR Doc. 04-2421 Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge 1 for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report an d re commendation of the Honorable William A. Knox, United State s Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri. ___________ No. 95-3247

___________ Jerry McCrary, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Western District of Missouri. * Timothy Brizendine; J.O. Enloe; * [UNPUBLISHED] Ronnie Howerton; Richard Watson, * *

Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 26, 1996 Filed: October 7, 1996

___________ Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jerry McCrary, a Missouri inmate, appeals from the district court's 1 grant of summary judgment to defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action
. McCra ryalleged defendants violated his constitutional rights b y handcuffing him too tightly, by finding him guil ty of an unfounded conduct violation, by depriving him of legal materials while in segregation, and by placing him in a segregation cell that was too hot. We affirm.
This court reviews the grant of summary judgment de novo. Se e Earnest v. Courtney , 64 F.3d 365, 366-67 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam ) (standard of review). McCrary failed to demonstrate-2-

de fendants applied the handcuffs maliciously or sadistically for th e purpo se of causing harm, and it was not unreasonable for defendants t o handcuff McCrary for the purposes of transportin g him to segregation after he created a disturbance in the recreation yard. See Howard v. Barnett , 21 F.3d 868, 871-72 (8th Cir. 1994) (where inmat e alleges excessive force,
no vio lation unless force applied maliciously and sadistically to caus e har m; force applied in good-faith effort to maintain or restor e discip line does not violate Eighth Amendment). As to McCrary' s claim he was punished for an unfounded conduct violation, nothing in t he record suggests McCrary's seven-day stay in disciplinar y segregation--as punishment for the conduct violation--constituted
anatypical, significant deprivation giving rise to a libert y interest. See Wycoff v. Nichols , No. 95-1117, slip op. at 3, 6-7 (8 thCir. Sept. 5, 1996) (quoting Sandin v. Conner , 115 S. Ct
. 2293, 2300-01 (1995)). Even if McCrary had a cognizable du e process claim, the reporting officer's statement that he observed Mc Craryengaging in the charged conduct provides some evidenc e sufficient to find McCrary guilty of creating a disturbance. See Goff v. Dailey , 991 F.2d 1437, 1442 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 510 U.S. 997 (1993).
Finally, McCrary failed to demonstrate how defendants ' withholding of his legal materials while he was in segregatio n prejudiced his access to the courts, see Berdella v. Delo , 9 72 F.2d 204, 210 (8th Cir. 1992), and failed to provide sufficient e vidence that the temperature inside his cell constituted a substanti al risk of harm of which defendants we re aware, see Farmer v. Brennan , 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1981-82 (1994).
We deny McCrary's motion for appointment of counsel on appea l.-3-

A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Arthur Suhr, an Infant, by Mary Suhr, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Benjamin F. Connor, Respondent.

Motion denied, on condition that appellant serve his proposed case on appeal by July 8, 1914, place the case on the next calendar and foe ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
### §5123. Speaker's Office for Legislative Floor Activities

There is established in the House of Representatives an office to be known as the Speaker's Office for Legislative Floor Activities. The Speaker shall appoint and set the annual rate of pay for employees of the Office. The Office shall have the responsibility of assisting the Speaker in the management of legislative floor activity.

(Pub. L. 104–53, title I, §103, Nov. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 520.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 74a–7 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is based on section 223(b) of House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Fourth Congress, Jan. 4, 1995, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 104–53.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Majority and Minority Positions

Pub. L. 107–68, title I, §113, Nov. 12, 2001, 115 Stat. 572, provided that:

"(a) Effective October 1, 2001, the following four majority positions shall be transferred from the Clerk to the Speaker:

"(1) The position of chief of floor service.

"(2) Two positions of assistant floor chief.

"(3) One position of cloakroom attendant.

"(b) Effective October 1, 2001, the following four minority positions shall be transferred from the Clerk to the minority leader:

"(1) The position of chief of floor service.

"(2) Two positions of assistant floor chief.

"(3) One position of cloakroom attendant.

"(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in the case of an individual who is an incumbent of a position transferred under subsection (a) or subsection (b) at the time of the transfer, the total number of days of annual leave and the total number of days of sick leave which were provided by the Clerk to the individual and which remain unused as of the date of the transfer shall remain available for the individual to use after the transfer."