alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2502. Definitions

For the purposes of this chapter:

#### (1) Potentially infectious medical waste

The term "potentially infectious medical waste" includes isolation wastes; infectious agents; human blood and blood products; pathological wastes; sharps; body parts; contaminated bedding; surgical wastes; and other disposable medical equipment and material that may pose a risk to the public health, welfare or the marine environment.

#### (2) Public vessel

The term "public vessel" means a vessel of any type whatsoever (including hydrofoils, air-cushion vehicles, submersibles, floating craft whether propelled or not, and fixed or floating platforms) that is owned, or demise chartered, and operated by the United States Government, and is not engaged in commercial service.

(Pub. L. 100–688, title III, §3103, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4152.)
#### § 1650.33 [Reserved]
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Electric Power
Trust II (the “Trust”) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
each of the undersigned officers of the Trust hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.







/s/
      Randall D. HolmesName:
            Randall
      D. HolmesTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)Date:
            February
      14, 2008






/s/
      Jeffrey H. StrasbergName:
            Jeffrey
      H. StrasbergTitle:
            Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)Date:
            February
      14, 2008
Order entered December 21, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01373-CV

JSC LAKE HIGHLANDS OPERATIONS, LP D/B/A VILLAGES OF LAKE 

HIGHLANDS, METROSTAT DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES, INC., RICHARD M. 

WILLIAMS, M.D. AND RICHARD M. WILLIAMS, M.D., P.L.L.C., Appellants

V.

KAREN MILLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE 

OF BETTY RUTH HATHCOCK AND BETTY CROCKETT, INDIVIDUALLY,

Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-00297-C

ORDER

We GRANT appellants’ December 16, 2015 unopposed joint motion for extension of 

time to file briefs and ORDER the briefs be filed no later than January 25, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
#### Anthony Wivchar, Jr., Appellant, v. Riverhead Estates, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

In an action by the payee to recover from the maker of five promissory notes it is asserted by way of defense and counterclaim that there was a failure of consideration because of a breach of the agreement for which the notes were given. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
#### § 191.21 Direct identification drawback.

Section 313(a) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(a)), provides for drawback upon the exportation, or destruction under Customs supervision, of articles which are not used in the United States prior to their exportation or destruction, and which are manufactured or produced in the United States wholly or in part with the use of particular imported, duty-paid merchandise and/or drawback product(s). Where two or more products result, drawback shall be distributed among the products in accordance with their relative value (see § 191.2(u)) at the time of separation. Merchandise may be identified for drawback purposes under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) in the manner provided for and prescribed in § 191.14 of this part.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7826

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BRANDON FOSTER, a/k/a Beezie,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:07-cr-00112-RGD-FBS-4)

Submitted: April 10, 2020 Decided: April 16, 2020

Before AGEE, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brandon Foster, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Brandon Foster appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a sentence 

reduction under Section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 

5194, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See United States v. Foster, No. 

4:07-cr-00112-RGD-FBS-4 (E.D. Va. Oct. 3, 2019; Sept. 19, 2019). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
annual report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 2010 (the Report), I,
Thad M. Brown, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    THAD M.
BROWNThad M. Brown Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)


February 26, 2010
#### § 111.22 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 04-23556) published on page 61840 of the issue for Thursday, October 21, 2004.

Under the Federal Reserve Bank of  St. Louis, heading, the entry for Russell Badgett, Jr. Irrevocable Trust, with Bentley F. Badgett, Jr., as trustee, both of Madisonville, Kentucky, is revised to read as follows:

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis**                     (Randall C. Sumner, Vice President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:                

*1.  Russell Badgett, Jr. Irrevocable Trust, with Bentley F. Badgett, Jr. as trustee*, both of Madisonville, Kentucky; to acquire voting shares of Hancock Bancorp, Inc., Hawesville, Kentucky, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Breckinridge Bank, Cloverport, Kentucky, and Hancock Bank & Trust Company, Hawesville, Kentucky.                

In connection with this application, the Badgett Control Group, which consists of Russell Badgett, Jr., Madisonville, Kentucky; Russell Badgett, Jr. Irrevocable Trust, Madisonville, Kentucky; Bentley F. Badgett, individually and as trustee, Madisonville, Kentucky; Dr. C. B. Badgett, Lewisport, Kentucky; Russell Badgett III, Owensboro, Kentucky; Joseph Rockney Badgett, Madisonville, Kentucky; Nita Anne Smaldone, Nashville, Tennessee; and Claudia Badgett Riner, Louisville, Kentucky, also have applied to retain voting shares of Hancock Bancorp, Inc., Hawesville, Kentucky, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Breckinridge Bank, Cloverport, Kentucky, and Hancock Bank & Trust Company, Hawesville, Kentucky.

Comments on this application must be received by November 4, 2004.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 21, 2004.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 04-23983 Filed 10-26-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0512

_________________

CHARLES J. HERINGER, III, as the Trustee of the

CHARLES J. HERINGER, III, Trust, dated May 20,

1999, as Amended and Restated; SHAWN A.

SCHAFFER and KRISTY M. SCHAFFER; MICHAEL 

A. DiFRONZO; TRACIE E. PABST; MOOSE 59, 

LLC; and MOOSE DROOL PROPERTIES, LLC,

 Plaintiffs and Appellants,

 v.

BARNEGAT DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC; 

RZLDZL, LLC; and John and Jane Does 1-10;

 Defendants and Appellees.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Rienne McElyea, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 3 2021

03/03/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0512
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-04-041 August 30, 2004

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NUCLEAR GAUGE REPORTED STOLEN IN NEW JERSEY; RECOVERY IS SOUGHT

 A New Jersey company has notified the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that a portable

moisture-density gauge containing sealed sources of radioactive material has been stolen.

 U.S. Engineering Labs, Inc., of Rahway, N.J., reported that a car belonging to one of its

employees was stolen from a parking spot at an apartment complex on Wilkenson Street in

Elizabeth, N.J., sometime early yesterday. Police were informed of the theft at about 7 a.m.

yesterday. The vehicle was a dark-blue, four-door 1992 Honda Accord. In the trunk of the car

was the device, a Troxler Model 3411 nuclear gauge.

 The device contains approximately 8 millicuries of cesium-137 and 40 millicuries of

americium-241. The gauge makes its measurements by projecting the radiation from the two

radioactive sources into the ground and then displaying the reflected radiation on a dial on its top.

 The gauge, which reportedly was in its transportation case, consists of a shielding

container with a plunger-type handle protruding from the top. The handle is used to extend and

then retract the radioactive sources from the shielded position. When not in use, the handle is

normally locked, with the sources in the retracted, safely shielded position. The rectangular base

of the gauge is yellow.

 As long as the sources are in the shielded position, the gauge would present no hazard to

the public. However, any attempt to tamper with the radioactive sources in the device could

subject the person to radiation exposure. Handling of the unshielded sources outside their

container would carry a risk of potentially dangerous radiation exposure.

 Anyone seeing the gauge should leave it alone and report its location to the NRC’s

Operations Center at (301) 816-5100. The center is staffed 24 hours a day and accepts collect

calls.
A typical carrying case for a moisture-density

gauge.

A typical moisture-density gauge in use.

 The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection has been notified about the

loss of the gauge.

 ###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-05-001 January 7, 2005

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC BEGINS SPECIAL INSPECTION OF PUMP ISSUES AT PERRY NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a special inspection of the circumstances

surrounding problems with two pumps which led to the shutdown of the Perry Nuclear Power Plant

early Thursday (Jan. 6). The plant, operated by FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co., is in Perry, Ohio.

Reactor operators shut down the plant after two recirculation pumps unexpectedly shifted

speed, and one of the pumps shut down. The recirculation pumps increase the rate at which water

flows through the reactor to increase the efficiency and power level of the reactor. The recirculation

system does not have a reactor safety function. 

During the reactor shutdown, reactor operators were unable to start another pump, used to

pump cooling water into the reactor. The operators then started a backup cooling system to maintain

reactor cooling. There was no leakage of reactor cooling water, and no hazard to plant workers or the

public associated with the shutdown.

The four-person NRC inspection team will begin its review today (Jan. 7), monitoring the

utility’s investigation and repair activities. The NRC resident inspectors have also been following the

event since early Thursday, shortly after the plant shut down.

The recirculation pumps have two speeds, a low speed for lower reactor power levels and a

high speed for higher power levels. The unexpected speed change reduced the rate of water flow

through the reactor, immediately reducing the power level from 100 percent to 46 percent.

The unexpected speed change was similar to an event which occurred December 23. The utility

determined that problem may have been caused by a faulty circuit card in the control system for the

recirculation pumps. The card was replaced, and the utility has continued its review of the event.

The NRC inspectors will also review the December 23 incident as part of its inspection.

An inspection report will be issued about 30 days following the completion of the NRC

inspection. The report will be publicly available in the NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and

Management System, or ADAMS, at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Use Docket

Number 05000440 to locate the report. Help in using ADAMS is available from the NRC Public

Document Room at 1-800-397-4209.
 # # #
From: Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US

To: Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov Cc: "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>, Peter

Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph Goffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wa yland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amanda CurryBrown/RTP/USEPA/US@ EPA Date: 03/23/2012 02:32 PM Subject: GHG NSPS RIA



### Attached below is both a clean and redline version of the RIA. The executive summary , chapter 1, and chapter 4 have no additional changes in them since the last version you reviewed. . I have also inclu ded redline versions of chapters 2, 3, 5, and 6. Those include the following changes, which are either minor corrections or edits to align with the preamble:

Chapter 2: Revised language discussing reconstructed sources to match the preamble edits delivere d to OMB on 4/13. Chapter 3: Corrected USGCRP, per their request on call last Friday. Chapter 5: Revised language on reconstructed sources to match preamble, corrected a few errors found after the 4/13 version, and fixed two typos in table 5

- 8. Chapter 6: Revised Paperwork Reduction Act language and description of projected generation to match preamble.

Clean RIA:

0 EGU GHG NSPS Exec Summary 0323 clean.docx

1 EGU GHG NSPS Introduction 0323 clean.docx

2 EGU GHG NSPS Control Strategies 0323 cl ean.docx

3 EGU GHG NSPS Defining Climate Change Problem 0323 clean.docx

4 EGU GHG NSPS Electric Power Sector Profile 0323 clean.docx

5 EGU GHG NSPS Costs Benefits 0323 clean.docx

6 EGU GHG NSPS Executive Order 0323 clean.docx

### Red line:

2 EGU GHG NSPS Control Strategies 0323 redline.docx

3 EGU GHG NSPS Defining Climate Change Problem 0323 redline.docx

5 EGU GHG NSPS Costs Benefits 0323 redline.docx

6 EGU GHG NSPS Executive Order 0323 redline.docx
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle, IL 60532

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. III-01-022 June 6, 2001

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH UNIVERSITY OFFICIALS ON APPARENT VIOLATIONS

AT SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet June 12 in Lisle, Illinois, with officials of

Southeast Missouri State University for a predecisional enforcement conference to discuss possible

safety violations at the Cape Girardeau, Missouri, campus.

The meeting will be at 10 a.m. CDT in the Third Floor Conference Room, NRC Region III

Office, 801 Warrenville Road, in Lisle. The meeting is open for public observation. Members of the

NRC staff will be available following the meeting for questions from the public.

The possible violations include a radiation overexposure, possession of a radioactive material

not authorized under the university’s NRC license, failure to do adequate surveys, and the loss of

radioactive material. The potential overexposure involved a contract employee of the university who

was on campus the week of June 12, 2000, doing work involving americium-241 contamination in an

university building. The individual potentially received an estimated dose to the bone of 263 rems.

The NRC’s annual limit for radiation exposure to the bone is 50 rem. A rem is a unit used to measure

the amount of radiation absorbed by the human body. There were no immediate medical effects to the

employee.

The possible violations were identified following a February 16, 2000, NRC inspection which

revealed several problems with the university’s radiation program and led to the discovery of

amercium-241 contamination in Magill Hall, one of the university’s science buildings. Since then the

contamination has been cleaned up and the building released for unrestricted use.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that a

determination has been made that violations have occurred or that enforcement action will be taken.

The purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance, to provide the

university with an opportunity to point out errors that may have been made in NRC inspection reports,

and to enable the university to outline its proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action, such as a civil

penalty, will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a later time.

###
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00479-CV

CITY OF HEWITT, Texas and Police Chief James Barton,

Appellants

v.

Danny 

Danny POWELL,

Appellee

From the 414th Judicial District Court, McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-4376-5

Honorable Vicki Lynn Menard, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 19, 2014

REVERSED AND REMANDED

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal stating they have reached a 

settlement, and requesting that we set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits 

and remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of a judgment in accordance with the parties’ 

settlement agreement. The parties further request expedited issuance of the mandate for good 

cause. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1(c). The motion is granted. The judgment of the trial court signed 

on April 4, 2013 is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2(d). Having found good cause, the clerk of the court is 
04-13-00479-CV

instructed to issue the mandate immediately. TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1(c). Costs of appeal are taxed 

against the parties who incurred them.

PER CURIAM

- 2 -
### §1517a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 101–164, title I, Nov. 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 1073, which authorized Secretary of Transportation to issue, and Secretary of the Treasury to purchase, notes or other obligations to meet obligations of Deepwater Port Liability Fund, applied to fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 1990, and was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts.

Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 100–457, title I, Sept. 30, 1988, 102 Stat. 2128.

Pub. L. 100–202, §101(l) [title I], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–358, 1329–361.

Pub. L. 99–500, §101(l) [H.R. 5205, title I], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–308, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(l) [H.R. 5205, title I], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–308.

Pub. L. 99–190, §101(e) [title I], Dec. 19, 1985, 99 Stat. 1267, 1270.

Pub. L. 98–473, title I, §101(i) [title I], Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1944, 1947.

Pub. L. 98–78, title I, Aug. 15, 1983, 97 Stat. 455.

Pub. L. 97–369, title I, Dec. 18, 1982, 95 Stat. 1767.

Pub. L. 97–102, title I, Dec. 23, 1981, 95 Stat. 1444.

Pub. L. 97–12, title I, June 5, 1981, 95 Stat. 67.
#### § 171.21 Written decisions.

If a petition for relief relates to a violation of sections 592, 593A or 641, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1592, 19 U.S.C. 1593a, or 19 U.S.C. 1641), the petitioner will be provided with a written statement setting forth the decision on the matter and the findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which the decision is based.