alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23767]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Notice of Application

    Pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on April 20, 
2004, Cody Laboratories, Inc., 301 Yellowstone Avenue, Cody, Wyoming 
82414, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amphetamine (1100).........................................           II
Methamphetamine (1105).....................................           II
Amobarbital (2125).........................................           II
Pentobarbital (2270).......................................           II
Secobarbital (2315)........................................           II
Cocaine (9041).............................................           II
Oxycodone (9143)...........................................           II
Dihydromorphine (9145).....................................           II
Hydromorphone (9150).......................................           II
Diphenoxylate (9170).......................................           II
Meperidine (9230)..........................................           II
Oxymorphone (9652).........................................           II
Sufentanil (9740)..........................................           II
Fentanyl (9801)............................................           II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture bulk materials for distribution to 
its customers.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such a substance may file comments or 
objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 
CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCD) and must be filed no later than December 27, 2004.

    Dated: October 18, 2004.
William J. Walker,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-23767 Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-04-005 February 17, 2004

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC SENDS SPECIAL INSPECTION TEAM TO CALVERT CLIFFS UNIT 2

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has sent a special inspection team to the Calvert

Cliffs nuclear power plant in Lusby, Md., to follow up on an automatic reactor shutdown in late

January. The two-unit site is operated by Constellation Energy.

 On January 23, the Calvert Cliffs Unit 2 reactor was operating at full power when one

of two steam generator feedwater pumps shut down. This pump supplies water to the plant’s

steam generators, which help cool the reactor and generate steam to drive the electricityproducing main turbine. The reactor automatically shut down, as designed.

 Following the shutdown, equipment issues complicated the work of the operators in

restoring reactor coolant system temperature and pressure to normal post-shutdown values. 

There were no public health and safety consequences. The NRC resident inspectors assigned to

the site monitored control room activities following the shutdown.

 The four-member inspection team arrived on site today. The purpose of the inspection

will be to independently evaluate equipment and human performance, and to assess

Constellation’s root cause evaluation of the event and corrective actions. The team should be at

the facility for about a week.

 An inspection report will be issued within 30 days of an exit meeting for the

inspection.

###
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois  60604

April 7, 2011

Before

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL P. McCUSKEY, District Judge*

Nos. 09‐3954, 09‐3961 & 10‐1204

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff‐Appellee,

v.

SCOTT LEWIS, VERNON WILLIAMS

and LAVOYCE BILLINGSLEY,

Defendants‐Appellants.

Appeals from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of

Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 1:07‐cr‐00007

Virginia M. Kendall,

Judge.

O R D E R

The final three paragraphs of the court’s April 6, 2011, opinion in this case are

stricken and the following inserted in their place:

Finally, Lewis and Williams argue that the district judge erred in imposing a

mandatory consecutive sentence under § 924(c).  That argument, although contrary to our

precedent, United States v. Easter, 553 F.3d 519 (7th Cir. 2009), is now foreclosed by Abbott v.

United States, 131 S. Ct. 18 (2010).

For all these reasons, the judgments of the district court are AFFIRMED.  

*

The Honorable Michael P. McCuskey, United States District Court for the Central

District of Illinois, sitting by designation.
### §303. Conditions precedent to award of lease; preferred class; bidding

Prior to the award of any lease under section 301 of this title, the Secretary of the Interior shall notify the owner or lessee of adjoining lands and allow him a reasonable time, to be fixed in the notice given, within which to submit an offer or bid of the amount or percentage of compensatory royalty that such owner will agree to pay for the extraction through wells on his or its adjoining land, of the oil or gas under and from such adjoining right of way, and at the same time afford the holder of the railroad or other right of way a like opportunity within the same time to submit its bid or offer as to the amount or percentage of royalty it will agree to pay, if a lease for the extraction of the oil and gas deposits under the right of way be awarded to the holder of such right of way. In case of competing offers by the said parties in interest, the Secretary shall award the right to extract the oil and gas to the bidder, duly qualified, making the offer in his opinion most advantageous to the United States. In case but one bid or offer is received after notice duly given, he may, in his discretion, award the right to extract the oil and gas to such bidder.

(May 21, 1930, ch. 307, §3, 46 Stat. 374.)
Exhibit 13.2.  Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Dr. Klaus Hartmann,
certify that the Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 11, 2005By:
  /s/ Dr. Klaus
  HartmannName:
  Dr. Klaus
  HartmannTitle:
  Chief Financial
  Officer
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

June 15, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 06-15012

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-20277-CR-FAM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

MANUEL SALVADOR HERNANDEZ-GOMEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(June 15, 2007)

Before ANDERSON, BIRCH and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Manuel Salvador Hernandez-Gomez appeals as unreasonable his sentence of
2

46 months of imprisonment for illegal reentry into the United States. The advisory

guidelines range was 46-57 months of imprisonment and the statutory maximum

was ten years of imprisonment. Hernandez-Gomez argues that the district court

expressed his disagreement with the guidelines range and imposed an unreasonable

sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). We affirm. 

 “Review for reasonableness is deferential.” United States v. Talley, 431

F.3d 784, 788 (11th Cir. 2005). “[T]he party who challenges the sentence bears the

burden of establishing that the sentence is unreasonable in the light of both that

record and the factors in section 3553(a).” Id. “When we review a sentence for

reasonableness, we do not, as the district court did, determine the exact sentence to

be imposed.” Id. “We must evaluate whether the sentence imposed by the district

court fails to achieve the purposes of sentencing as stated in section 3553(a).” Id. 

“[W]hen the district court imposes a sentence within the advisory Guidelines

range, we ordinarily will expect that choice to be a reasonable one.” Id. 

The district court did not err. The district court correctly recognized that its

general disagreement with the Sentencing Guidelines was not a legitimate reason

to vary from the Guidelines. See United States v. Williams, 456 F.3d 1353, 1366

(11th Cir. 2006), petition for cert. filed, No. 06-7352 (U.S. Oct. 19, 2006). The

district court considered the factors in section 3553(a) and sentenced Hernandez-
3

Gomez well below the statutory maximum and at the low end of the guidelines

range. That sentence is not unreasonable. 

Hernandez-Gomez’s sentence is

AFFIRMED.
§ 220.9 Withdrawal of petitions, amendments to petitions. ( a ) *Withdrawal of petitions.* A petitioner may withdraw a petition for duty suspension or reduction filed under this part no later than 30 days after the Commission submits its preliminary report, as described in § 220.12. It shall do so by notifying the Commission through the Commission's designated secure web portal of its withdrawal and the notification shall include the name of the petitioner, the Commission identification number for the petition, and the HTS number for the article concerned.
( b ) *Submission of new petition.* A petitioner who withdraws a petition for duty suspension or reduction that was timely filed under § 220.4 may submit a new petition, but only during the 60-day period described in § 220.4.
( c ) *Amendments to petitions.* A petitioner may not amend or otherwise change a petition once it is submitted. If a petitioner wishes to amend or otherwise change a petition, such as to correct an error, the petitioner must withdraw the petition and file a new petition containing the changes in accordance with paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
[81 FR 67149, Sept. 30, 2016, as amended at 84 FR 44693, Aug. 27, 2019]
#### Prudential Exporters Corporation v. Guaranty Trust Company.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 944.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF MARINE BANCSHARES DATED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,104
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 280,247
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                   895,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            248,797
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                1
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (863,551)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 280,247
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 3,525
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,525
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             100,005
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          (96,480)
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                219,087
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (315,567)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (315,567)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (315,567)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                (315,567)
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of eMagin Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Paul Campbell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                  |     |                                                            | 
|----------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                  |     |                                                           
|                  |     |                                                            | 
|September 3, 2015 | By: | /s/ Paul Campbell                                          | 
|                  |     | Paul Campbell                                              | 
|                  |     | Chief Financial Officer                                    | 
|                  |     | (Chief Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 12, 2016 

# Order

January 12 , 2016

150994 ( 7 5 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

,

v

LORINDA IRENE SWAIN

, Defendant

- Appell ant

. SC: 150994

COA: 314564

Calhoun CC: 2001

- 004547

- FC

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion for the temporary admission of out

- of

state attorneys Chad J. Ray, Paul D. Margolis, and Sara Tonnies Horton to appear and

practice under MCR 8.126(A) on behalf of amicus curiae former Michigan prosecutors

John Smietanka, Thomas Cranmer, and James Samuels is GRANTED.
#### § 19.46 Employee lists.

A permit shall not be granted to an operator to transfer a container or containers to a container station, if the operator, within 30 calendar days after the date of receipt of a written demand by the port director, does not furnish a written list of names, addresses, social security numbers, and dates and places of birth of persons employed by him in connection with the movement, receipt, storage or delivery of imported merchandise. Having furnished such a list, no new permit shall be issued to an operator who has not within 10 calendar days after the employment of any new personnel employed in connection with the movement, receipt, storage, or delivery of imported merchandise, advised the port director in writing of the names, addresses, social security numbers, and dates and places of birth of such new employees. The operator shall, within 10 calendar days, advise the port director if the employment of any employee is terminated. A person shall not be deemed to be employed by an operator if he is an officer or employee of an independent contractor engaged by the operator to move, receive, store, deliver, or otherwise handle imported merchandise.
### §4332. Assistance to Senators with committee memberships by employees in office of Senator

#### (1) Designation

A Senator may designate employees in his office to assist him in connection with his membership on committees of the Senate. An employee may be designated with respect to only one committee.

#### (2) Certification; professional staff privileges

An employee designated by a Senator under this section shall be certified by him to the chairman and ranking minority member of the committee with respect to which such designation is made. Such employee shall be accorded all privileges of a professional staff member (whether permanent or investigatory) of such committee including access to all committee sessions and files, except that any such committee may restrict access to its sessions to one staff member per Senator at a time and require, if classified material is being handled or discussed, that any staff member possess the appropriate security clearance before being allowed access to such material or to discussion of it. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall be construed to prohibit a committee from adopting policies and practices with respect to the application of this section which are similar to the policies and practices adopted with respect to the application of section 705(c)(1) 1 of Senate Resolution 4, 95th Congress, and section 72a–1d(c)(1) 1 of this title.

#### (3) Termination

A Senator shall notify the chairman and ranking minority member of a committee whenever a designation of an employee under this section with respect to such committee is terminated.

(Pub. L. 95–94, title I, §111(c), Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 662.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 705(c)(1) of Senate Resolution 4, 95th Congress, referred to in par. (2), which was not classified to the Code, was repealed by Pub. L. 95–94, title I, §111(e)(2), Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 663.

Section 72a–1d(c)(1) of this title, referred to in par. (2), was repealed by Pub. L. 95–94, title I, §111(e)(1), Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 663.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 72a–1e of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Congressional Operations Appropriation Act, 1978, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriation Act, 1978.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 95–94, title I, §111(f), Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 663, provided that: "This section, and the amendments made by subsection (d) and the repeals made by subsection (e) [enacting this section, amending section 4575 of this title, enacting notes set out under section 4575 of this title, and repealing section 72a–1d and notes set out under former section 72a–1d of this title], shall take effect on October 1, 1977."

1 See References in Text note below.
### §1106. Reports to Congress

(a) The President shall transmit to the Congress biennially in January a report, which shall include (1) a comprehensive description of the activities and the accomplishments of all agencies and departments of the United States in the field of marine science during the preceding fiscal year, and (2) an evaluation of such activities and accomplishments in terms of the objectives set forth pursuant to this Act.

(b) Reports made under this section shall contain such recommendations for legislation as the President may consider necessary or desirable for the attainment of the objectives of this Act, and shall contain an estimate of funding requirements of each agency and department of the United States for marine science activities during the succeeding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 89–454, title I, §7, June 17, 1966, 80 Stat. 207; Pub. L. 99–386, title II, §203(a), Aug. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 823.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 89–454, June 17, 1966, 80 Stat. 203, which, at the time this section was enacted, consisted only of sections 1 to 9, which are classified generally to this subchapter. Pub. L. 89–688, §2, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 1001, redesignated the Act as title I and made conforming amendments, substituting references to title I for previous references to the Act as a whole, but not in this section. Pub. L. 89–454 was amended by Pub. L. 89–688 by adding title II, which is classified generally to subchapter II of this chapter, and later by Pub. L. 92–583 by adding title III, which is classified generally to chapter 33 (§1451 et seq.) of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Amendments

1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–386 substituted "biennially in January" for "in January of each year".
### §6112. Compensation of Deputy President pro tempore of Senate

Effective January 5, 1977, the compensation of a Deputy President pro tempore of the Senate shall be at a rate equal to the rate of annual compensation of the President pro tempore and the Majority and Minority Leaders of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 95–26, title I, May 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 79.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 32a of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1977.