alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 2, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 63563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24383]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste, Meeting on Planning and 
Procedures; Notice of Meeting

    The ACNW will hold a Planning and Procedures meeting on November 
16, 2004, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the 
exception of a portion that may be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) 
(2) and (6) to discuss organizational and personnel matters that relate 
solely to internal personnel rules and practices of ACNW, and 
information the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted 
invasion of personal privacy.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:
    Tuesday, November 16, 2004--8:30 a.m.-10 a.m.
    The Committee will discuss proposed ACNW activities and related 
matters. The purpose of this meeting is to gather information, analyze 
relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and 
actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or 
written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. 
Howard J. Larson (telephone: 301/415-6805) between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 
p.m. (e.t.) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that 
appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be 
permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are open to 
the public.
    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by 
contacting the Designated Federal Official between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 
p.m. (e.t.). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to 
contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to 
the meeting to be advised of any potential changes in the agenda.

    Dated: October 27, 2004.
John H. Flack,
Acting Branch Chief, ACRS/ACNW.
[FR Doc. 04-24383 Filed 11-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Internet Archive's Wayback Machine

Loading...

http://www.aphis.usda.gov/publications/wildlife_damage/content/printable_version/fs_wslpcinjunct.pdf | 3:14:16 Mar 27, 2009

Got an HTTP 302 response at crawl time

Redirecting to...

http://www.aphis.usda.gov/404.shtml

Impatient?

The Wayback Machine is an initiative of the Internet Archive, a 501(c)(3) non-profit, building a digital library of Internet sites and other cultural artifacts in digital form.Other projects include Open Library & archive-it.org.

Your use of the Wayback Machine is subject to the Internet Archive's Terms of Use.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 03-166 December 30, 2003

CORRECTED TO REFLECT EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE AS OCTOBER 1, 2004.

NRC REVISES SAFETY STANDARDS FOR PACKAGING 

AND TRANSPORTATION OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a final rule revising safety standards for the

packaging and transportation of radioactive material. Most of the changes update U.S. regulations to

make them similar to international standards established by the International Atomic Energy Agency

(IAEA).

The NRC’s current transportation regulations are based, in part, on those developed by the

IAEA, a worldwide standard-setting organization. The IAEA periodically revises its transportation

standards to reflect scientific and technical advances, and the NRC accordingly updates its own

regulations to be compatible with those of the IAEA. The current revision is being coordinated with

the Department of Transportation, which is the lead federal agency for transportation regulations in the

United States.

Among other things, the final rule would phase out the use of older approved designs for certain

transportation packages. This change is being imposed, despite an excellent safety record for the older

package designs, in order to bring U.S. transportation regulations into alignment with those in place

internationally and to take advantage of safety enhancements in newer designs. Industry will have four

years to phase in the use of newer designs.

The final rule also grants a petition for rulemaking to eliminate double-seal requirements for

plutonium shipments. There is no comparable IAEA requirement for the use of double seals on

packages containing plutonium, and current single-seal packages used for transporting spent fuel would

provide adequate accident protection when applied to packages transporting plutonium. The final rule

maintains a requirement, however, that shipments of greater than 20 Curies of plutonium must be made

with the contents in solid form. 

A proposed rule, published in April 2002, sought public comment on 19 open issues, 11 of

which were designed for consistency with the IAEA standards. A total of 190 comments were

received. The final rule defers a decision on a proposal to allow NRC certificate holders to make

limited changes to dual-purpose spent fuel storage and transportation packages and makes other minor
-2-

changes to the proposed rule. Public comments and NRC responses will be discussed in a Federal

Register notice on the final rule, to be published shortly.

The final rule will be effective October 1, 2004. 

###
EXHIBIT 20
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


Harry Puglisi, Treasurer of The Money Store Auto Finance, Inc. (the "Servicer"),
inaccordance with Section 4.11 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement ("Agreement")
dated as of August 31, 1997 wherein The Money Store Auto Finance, Inc., is the
"Servicer" states the following:


          (i)  a review of the activities of the Servicer during 1997 and of its
               performance under the Agreement has been made under my
               supervision;

          (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Servicer has
               fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout 1997
               and there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such
               obligation.


THE MONEY STORE AUTO FINANCE, INC.




BY: /S/ HARRY PUGLISI
    ------------------
    Harry Puglisi
    Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information 
extracted from the Registrant's unaudited interim financial
statements for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 and 
is qualified in its entirety by reference to those financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000895993
<NAME> RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST II
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          0
<SECURITIES>                           14,848,067<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                             257,637<F2>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          257,637
<PP&E>                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         15,109,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     469,878
<BONDS>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                             14,639,552<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           15,109,230
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          893,213
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          376,183
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           517,030
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       517,030
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              517,030
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               2,197
<EPS-DILUTED>                               2,197

<FN>
<F1>Investments in power project partnerships and note 
receivable from sale of San Diego Project.
<F2>Due from affiliates.
<F3>Represents Investor Shares of beneficial interest in
Trust with capital accounts of $14,694,390 less managing
shareholder's accumulated deficit of $54,848.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-03-038 May 29, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan 610/337-5331

NRC LICENSING BOARD TO HEAR ARGUMENT ON CONTENTION

 CHALLENGING MILLSTONE LICENSE AMENDMENT

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board has scheduled

oral argument for June 5 on whether a hearing should be granted on a challenge to a request by

Dominion Nuclear Connecticut to amend the license of its Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit

2, in Waterford, Conn. 

The proceeding involves a petition for intervention submitted in December by the

Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone challenging a Dominion proposal to change certain

facility technical specifications relating to containment closure during activities in the spent fuel

pool area. 

Oral argument by counsel for the parties will begin at 9:00 a.m. in the Conrad/Morgan

Meeting Room of the Best Western Sovereign Hotel, 9 Whitehall Avenue, in Mystic, Conn. The

public is invited to observe the proceeding. 

The following Administrative Judges from the NRC’s Atomic Safety And Licensing

Board are members of this panel: Ann Marshall Young, Chair; Dr. Richard F. Cole; and Dr.

Thomas S. Elleman.

Documents related to this proceeding are available electronically through the agency’’s

Agencywide Documents Access and Management Systems (ADAMS) at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html. Help in using ADAMS is available

from the NRC’’s Public Document Room at 800/397-4209. Those without internet access may

also contact the Public Document Room at this number. 

###
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-02-040 July 29, 2002

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: opa2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC CITES OCONEE NUCLEAR PLANT FOR VIOLATION 

OF LOW TO MODERATE SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has determined that a violation of NRC safety

regulations at Unit 1 of the Duke Energy’s Oconee nuclear power plant near Seneca, South Carolina,

should be characterized as “white,” meaning that it is of low to moderate importance to safety. 

 An NRC inspection completed on March 12 of this year identified a violation of NRC requirements. 

From approximately December of 1995 until April of 2001, a problem in the plant’s High Pressure

Service Water System was not promptly corrected following identification by the company. 

 The High Pressure Service Water System in the Unit 1 auxiliary building was filled and pressurized

with water instead of being in a dry condition. The NRC said a rupture of the HPSW line in the

auxiliary building would cause flooding and could disable safety equipment due to a lack of mitigation

capabilities. The NRC said the HPSW system is constructed of metal, uses untreated lake water and

has shown signs of corrosion.

 Under its safety significance determination process, NRC officials classify certain conditions at

nuclear power plants as being one of four colors which delineate increasing levels of safety

significance, progressing from green to white to yellow to red.

 The NRC staff in an inspection report dated April 30, 2001, documented the finding and assessed it

under the significance determination process as a preliminary “white” issue. An open regulatory

conference was conducted at Duke Energy Corporation’s request on June 27 of this year, and Duke

was notified of the agency’s final significance determination in a letter dated July 26.

 In addition to the “white” determination, the NRC issued a Notice of Violation to Duke for failing

to take timely corrective action. NRC officials have concluded that recent corrective actions that have

been taken and those planned to correct the violation and to prevent recurrence are adequate.

 Additional details on the “white” finding are available in a letter and Notice of Violation from the

NRC to Duke Energy dated July 26, 2002, which can be obtained from the NRC Region II public
affairs office at the above address, or from the NRC Public Electronic Reading Room on the agency’s

Internet Web Site at: www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . Help in using the Public Reading Room

is available by contacting the NRC Public Document Room at 301/415-4737 or 1/800/397-4209.

###
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-05-008 March 22, 2005

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO DISCUSS 2004 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

 FOR WATERFORD 3 NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Entergy Nuclear

Operations, Inc., on Wednesday, March 30, to discuss the agency’s annual assessment of safety

performance at the Waterford 3 nuclear plant for calendar year 2004. Entergy operates the plant,

which is located near Taft, La.

The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at

6:30 p.m. at the St. Charles Parish Courthouse Council Chambers, 15045 River Road, in

Hahnville, La. Before the session is adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions

from the public on the plant’s safety performance, as well as the agency’s role in ensuring safe

operation of the facility.

“Each year the NRC staff evaluates the performance of each of the nation’s commercial

nuclear plants,” said Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallet. “This meeting gives us a chance

to discuss our assessment with the company, local officials and residents near the plant. We

want to make this information available to the public and answer any questions people may have

about the plant.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas, to plant officials will

serve as the basis for the meeting. It is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/wat_2004q4.pdf .

Overall, Waterford 3 operated safely during 2004. The NRC uses color-coded inspection

findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear plant performance. The colors start with

“green” and increase to “white,” “yellow,” and “red,” according to the safety significance of the

issues involved. Waterford 3 had one “white” inspection finding during 2004, but an NRC
2

inspection found that the company’s subsequent actions were adequate to address the issue. 

Based on these results and overall performance, Waterford 3 will receive the baseline, or normal

level of inspections during 2005.

Routine inspections are performed by the NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant

and by inspection specialists from the Region IV office and the agency’s headquarters in

Rockville, Md. 

Current information for the Waterford 3 nuclear plant is available on the NRC web site

at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/WAT3/wat3_chart.html .

###
#### § 1631.35 Certification (authentication) of copies of records.

The Board may certify that copies of records are true copies in order to facilitate their use as evidence. The records custodian or other qualified individual shall certify copies of books, records, papers, writings, and documents by attaching a written declaration that complies with current Federal Rules of Evidence. No seal or notarization shall be required.
### §939. Limitation on changes to the Social Security Act

#### (a) Limitation on changes to the Social Security Act

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, it shall not be in order in the Senate or the House of Representatives to consider any bill or resolution pursuant to any expedited procedure to consider the recommendations of a Task Force for Responsible Fiscal Action or other commission that contains recommendations with respect to the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance program established under title II of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 401 et seq.], or the taxes received under subchapter A of chapter 9; the taxes imposed by subchapter E of chapter 1; and the taxes collected under section 86 of part II of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code.

#### (b) Waiver

This section may be waived or suspended in the Senate only by the affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn.

#### (c) Appeals

An affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members of the Senate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required in the Senate to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order raised under this section.

(Pub. L. 111–139, title I, §13, Feb. 12, 2010, 124 Stat. 29.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Social Security Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, 49 Stat. 620. Title II of the Act is classified generally to subchapter II (§401 et seq.) of chapter 7 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1305 of Title 42 and Tables.

Subchapter A of chapter 9 and subchapter E of chapter 1, referred to in subsec. (a), probably mean subchapter A of chapter 9 and subchapter E of chapter 1, respectively, of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, which were comprised of sections 1400 to 1432 and 480 to 482, respectively, and were repealed (subject to certain exceptions) by section 7851(a)(1)(A), (3) of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

Section 86 of part II of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code, referred to in subsec. (a), probably means section 86 of part II of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, which is classified to section 86 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
| (1)        | The Report fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|            |                                                                                                                                                          |
| (2)   | The information      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the  Trust. |

| /s/      Randall D. Holmes |
|----------------------------|
| Name:                 | Randall      D. Holmes |
| Title:      | President      and Chief Executive Officer |
|                       | (Principal      Executive Officer) |
| Date:                 | May      6, 2008 |

| /s/      Jeffrey H. Strasberg |
|-------------------------------|
| Name:                    | Jeffrey      H. Strasberg |
| Title:         | Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                          | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer) |
| Date:                    | May      6, 2008 |

----
#### § 10001.6 Fees.

We will not charge a fee for search or review of records requested under this part, or for the correction of records. If you request copies of records, we may charge a fee of $.10 per page.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark L. Lemond, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                         
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of   operations of the Company.

|Date:  September 8, 2005 | By: | /s/ Mark L. Lemond                                     
|------------------------ | --- | -------------------------------------------------------
|                         |     |                                                        
|                         |     | Mark L. Lemond    President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     The undersigned, who is the chief executive officer and the chief financial
officer of Community First Bancorporation, hereby certifies that, to the best of
his knowledge,  the accompanying Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934  and  that  information  contained  in the  report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the issuer.

March 30, 2010

                             s/Frederick D. Shepherd, Jr.
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Frederick D. Shepherd, Jr.
                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### Francis W. Ruzicka et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of “Ruzicka’s”, Respondents, v. Greenhouse Flower Cooperative, Inc., et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.