alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Planet Polymer Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, H. M. Busby, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 14, 2003

/s/ H. M. Busby
___________________________
H. M. Busby
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |   |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                               |   |   |   |
| Dated:  January      12, 2009 |   |   |   | By:    |   | /s/   Andrew      G. Sculley |
|                               |   |   |   |   |   | Andrew      G. SculleyChief      Executive Officer |
Exhibit
32.2





Ener1,
Inc.


1540
Broadway, Suite 25C


New York,
New York 10036





January
15, 2010





Securities
and Exchange Commission


100 F
Street, NE


Washington,
DC 20549





Re:
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350





Dear
Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 1
of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, I, Gerard A. Herlihy, Chief Financial Officer of Ener1,
Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
            such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 1 of Ener1, Inc., for
      the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and





2)
            the
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A Amendment
      No. 1 of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Ener1, Inc.





/s/
      Gerard A. HerlihyGerard
      A. Herlihy
                    Chief
      Financial Officer
                    (Duly
      Authorized Principal Financial and Principal
                    Accounting
      Officer and Duly Authorized
Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.





This
certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to Ener1, Inc.’s
quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
filing.
#### In the Matter of the City of New York, Respondent-Appellant, Relative to Acquiring Title to the Water Mains, etc., of the New York Water Service Corporation, within the former 29th Ward (Flatbush) in the Borough of Brooklyn. New York Water Service Corporation et al., Appellants-Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
### §6312. Clerks to Senators-elect

A Senator entitled to receive his own salary may appoint the usual clerical assistants allowed Senators.

(Mar. 2, 1895, ch. 177, §1, 28 Stat. 766; Feb. 20, 1923, ch. 98, 42 Stat. 1266; June 19, 1934, ch. 648, title I, §1, 48 Stat. 1022.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 67 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1934—Act June 19, 1934, struck out provisions as to maximum of four clerical assistants and as to their compensation.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 21, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 21, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21D0134. STEVEN A. WISE v. JENNEL G. WISE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2018CV248 2018CV749 2020CV670
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-046 March 8, 2005

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING MARCH 14 ON

POSSIBLE COMBINED LICENSE APPLICATION

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Duke Power and interested stakeholders on

March 14 in Rockville, Md., to discuss Duke’s possible application for a Combined License (COL) to build a

nuclear power plant.

The NRC amended its licensing regulations in 1989, creating the COL to provide an alternative

to the existing process. When the nation’s current 104 licensed reactors were built, an applicant had to

first obtain a construction permit. Following completion of construction and testing, the applicant then

had to obtain an operating license before a plant could start up. A Combined License authorizes both

construction and conditional operation of a nuclear power plant. The COL process incorporates

inspections, tests, analyses and acceptance criteria into the construction phase to provide information

necessary to demonstrate that the reactor could operate safely once construction is complete.

The meeting will be held in the Commission Conference Room (O-1F16) of the NRC’s One

White Flint North Building, 11555 Rockville Pike, from 1 p.m. until 4:30 p.m. The meeting will

include discussion of possible COL application strategies and review schedules, as well as how the

agency and Duke would interact during the pre-application stage. The meeting agenda is available on

the NRC’s web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/public-meetings/agenda/2005-0120.pdf .

Members of the public are invited to observe the meeting and discuss the possible COL

application with NRC staff after the business portion of the meeting, but before the meeting adjourns. 

For more information on the meeting, contact Amy Cubbage at 301-415-2875 or via email at

aec@nrc.gov . Parties interested in participating in the meeting via teleconference must contact Ms.

Cubbage by the close of business on March 11.

###
Case 0:20-cv-61690-AHS Document 18-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2020 Page 1 of 4
Case 0:20-cv-61690-AHS Document 18-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2020 Page 2 of 4
Case 0:20-cv-61690-AHS Document 18-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2020 Page 3 of 4
Case 0:20-cv-61690-AHS Document 18-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/06/2020 Page 4 of 4
#### §§ 1850.141-1850.149 [Reserved]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-164 December 20, 2004

NRC ISSUES DRAFT SAFETY EVALUATION FOR

 NORTH ANNA EARLY SITE PERMIT APPLICATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued a draft safety evaluation report (SER) for

an Early Site Permit (ESP) for the North Anna site in Louisa County, Va., about 40 miles northwest of

Richmond.

The ESP process allows an applicant to address site-related issues, such as environmental

impacts, for possible future construction and operation of a nuclear power plant at the site. The North

Anna application was filed Sept. 25, 2003, by Dominion Nuclear North Anna, LLC. If approved, the

permit would give Dominion up to 20 years to decide whether to build one or more nuclear plants on

the site and to file an application with the NRC for approval to begin construction.

NRC reviewers expect to finalize the safety evaluation by June 2005. Along with the SER, the

staff must complete an Environmental Impact Statement, the Advisory Committee on Reactor

Safeguards must issue a report on the ESP application, and the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

Panel must conclude its hearing on the matter before the Commission can reach a final decision on

issuing the ESP. The NRC expects to finish this process in mid-2006.

The 400-page draft SER contains the agency's review of the North Anna ESP application,

supplemented with information submitted by Sept. 30, 2004. The NRC staff has reviewed information

Dominion provided regarding the ESP site in areas including:

– site seismology, geology, meteorology and hydrology;

– risks from potential accidents resulting from operation of a nuclear plant at the site;

– the site’s ability to support adequate physical security for a nuclear plant and

– proposed major features of the emergency plan Dominion would implement if a reactor is

eventually built at the site.

Dominion will have 21 days to review the draft SER for proprietary information. The report

will then be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, 11555

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. It will also be available on the NRC’s Web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/esp/north-anna.html. In addition, the Louisa County Library,

881 Davis Highway in Mineral, has agreed to make the draft SER available for public inspection.

###
NRC NEWS

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-04-056 December 3, 2004

Contact: Ken Clark (404) 562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417

NRC TO MEET WITH U. S. ENRICHMENT CORPORATION

TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE AT PADUCAH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials have scheduled a meeting with officials of the United

States Enrichment Corporation in Paducah, Ky., on Monday, Dec. 13, to discuss the NRC’s latest

review of performance at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant. 

The meeting is scheduled for 8:30 a.m. (EST) at the Paducah Information Age Park Resource

Center, located at 2000 McCracken Boulevard in Paducah. Interested members of the public can

attend and observe the discussion, and there will be an opportunity to ask questions or make comments

to the NRC staff after the business portion but before the meeting is adjourned.

 "These meetings give NRC officials a chance to discuss with the company the overall

performance at the plant and any concerns we might have," said NRC Fuel Facility Branch Chief Jay

Henson. 

The NRC assessment is called a Licensee Performance Review and covers the period from

January 1, 2003, to September 25, 2004.

The NRC staff evaluated performance at the Paducah plant in four major areas: Safety

Operations, Radiological Controls, Facility Support and Special Topics. The NRC said the review

determined that the Paducah plant continued to conduct its activities safely, and the agency will discuss

details of the review with company officials at the meeting. 

Interested persons may obtain a copy of the results of the review from the NRC by writing, 

calling, or emailing the NRC Region II Office of Public Affairs in Atlanta using the contact

information listed above.

Immediately following the NRC performance review, a second meeting is scheduled at the

same location to discuss the company’s efforts in ensuring a safety conscious work environment at the

Paducah facility and at a similar plant near Portsmouth, Ohio. The public is also invited to this

meeting and will have an opportunity to talk with the NRC staff after the business portion but before

the meeting is adjourned.

###
### **CHAPTER 21—INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS FOR PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA**

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

For prior provisions, see note set out under section 1602 of this title.
CH

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001

41 September 13, 2002

AIRMAN

The Honorable Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Chairman

Committee on Foreign Relations

United States Senate

Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Mr. Chairman:

I am writing on behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to report on

the status of the development of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the NRC

and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), concerning remediation of sites under

NRC regulatory authority and avoidance of dual regulation. In my letter to you of June 26,

2002, the Commission committed to providing a further status report.

We have delayed providing this most recent status report pending completion of the

Commission's review of the proposed MOU. The Commission, in approving the MOU with

certain minor changes, has sought to limit the potential for dual regulation. In this connection,

the proposed MOU, as approved by the Commission, provides for EPA to continue its policy of

deferral to NRC decommissioning decision-making for the majority of NRC licensees (i.e., those

not considering restricted release or alternate criteria for license termination, those sites without

radioactive contamination that exceeds certain levels at the time of license termination, and

those without ground-water contamination above EPA's drinking water maximum contaminant

levels at the time of license termination). It includes provisions governing consultation for the

sites for which EPA can not agree to defer.

This MOU does not fully meet the intent of the Appropriations Committee because the

threat of dual regulation remains for certain NRC licensees. The Committee's direction to the

two agencies was to enter into an MOU which would clarify the circumstances for EPA's

involvement at NRC sites "when requested by the NRC." EPA could not agree to such a limited

role. As a result, unnecessary dual regulation will continue under this MOU. Thus, the

Commission believes that legislation is still needed to eliminate dual regulation for these

remaining NRC licensees. In completing action on the proposed MOU, the Commission has

directed the NRC staff to continue to pursue such legislation.

001
-2-

The Commission is ready to sign the MOU with minor changes and has forwarded it to

EPA. The Commission will report to you by November 29, 2002, on the status of our efforts to

complete a final MOU. If you desire additional information or clarification, please contact me.

cc: Senator Jesse Helms
§ 190.33 Person entitled to claim unused merchandise drawback. ( a ) *Direct identification.* ( 1 ) Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1), as amended, the exporter or destroyer will be entitled to claim drawback.
( 2 ) The exporter or destroyer may waive the right to claim drawback and assign such right to the importer or any intermediate party. A drawback claimant under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) other than the exporter or destroyer must secure and retain a certification signed by the exporter or destroyer waiving the right to claim drawback, and stating that it did not and will not authorize any other party to claim the exportation or destruction for drawback (*see* § 190.82). The certification provided for under this section may be a blanket certification for a stated period. The claimant must file such certification with each claim.
( b ) *Substitution.* ( 1 ) Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2), as amended, the following parties may claim drawback: ( i ) In situations where the exporter or destroyer of the substituted merchandise is also the importer of the imported merchandise, that party will be entitled to claim drawback.
( ii ) In situations where the person who imported and paid the duty on the imported merchandise transfers the imported merchandise, substituted merchandise, or any combination of imported and substituted merchandise to the person who exports or destroys that merchandise, the exporter or destroyer will be entitled to claim drawback. (Any such transferred merchandise, regardless of its origin, will be treated as imported merchandise for purposes of drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2), and any retained merchandise will be treated as domestic merchandise.)
( iii ) In situations where the transferred merchandise described in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section is the subject of further transfer(s), such transfer(s) must be documented by records, including records kept in the normal course of business, and the exporter or destroyer will be entitled to claim drawback (multiple substitutions are not permitted).
( 2 ) The exporter or destroyer may waive the right to claim drawback and assign such right to the importer or to any intermediate party, provided that the claimant had possession of the substituted merchandise prior to its exportation or destruction. A drawback claimant under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) other than the exporter or destroyer must secure and retain a certification signed by the exporter or destroyer that such party waived the right to claim drawback, and stating that it did not and will not authorize any other party to claim the exportation or destruction for drawback (*see* § 190.82). The certification provided for under this section may be a blanket certification for a stated period. The claimant must file such certification with each claim.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2416]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

United States Fish and Wildlife Service

[I.D. 010904B]


Marine Mammals; File No. 1038-1693-00/PRT064776

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce; U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Interior.

ACTION: Issuance of permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Darla Rae Ewalt, Principal 
Investigator, Diagnostic Bacteriology Laboratory, National Veterinary 
Services Laboratories, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 
United States Department of Agriculture, 1800 Dayton Road, Ames, IA 
50010, has been issued a permit to import/export marine mammal 
specimens from Canada for purposes of scientific research.

ADDRESSES: The permit and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following office(s):
    Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 
20910; phone (301)713-2289; fax (301)713-0376;
    Southeast Region, NMFS, 9721 Executive Center Drive North, St. 
Petersburg, FL 33702-2432; phone (727)570-5301; fax (727)570-5320; and
    Branch of Permits, Division of Management Authority, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ruth Johnson or Jennifer Skidmore, 
(301)713-2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 9, 2003, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (68 FR 58316) that a request for a scientific 
research permit to import/export marine mammal specimens had been 
submitted by the above-named individual. The requested permit has been 
issued under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, 
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), and the Regulations Governing the 
Taking and Importing of Marine Mammals (50 CFR parts 18 and 216).

    Dated: January 30, 2004.
Amy C. Sloan,
Acting Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of 
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.

    Dated: January 30, 2004.
Charlie R. Chandler,
Chief, Branch of Permits (Domestic), Division of Management Authority, 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 04-2416 Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
### **CHAPTER 41—NATIONAL COASTAL MONITORING**

Sec.
2801.
Purposes.
2802.
Definitions.
2803.
Comprehensive Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Program.
2803a.
Ocean and coastal resiliency.
2804.
Report to Congress.
2805.
Authorization of appropriations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1998
<CASH>                                          10,357
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                       213
<INVENTORY>                                     37,927
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,563
<PP&E>                                          30,185
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,473
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,161
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,455
<SALES>                                         74,149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,149
<CGS>                                           58,582
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,582
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,034
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 403
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,130
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,241
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,889
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,889
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28
        

</TABLE>