alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1631.12 Waiver or reduction of fees. ( a ) The Board may waive all fees or levy a reduced fee when disclosure of the information requested is deemed to be in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities of the Board or Federal Government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester. In making its decision on waiving or reducing fees, the Board will consider the following factors: ( 1 ) Whether the subject of the requested records concerns the operations or activities of the Board or the Government,
( 2 ) Whether the disclosure is likely to contribute to an understanding of Government operations or activities (including those of the Board),
( 3 ) Whether the disclosure is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of TSP or Government operations or activities,
( 4 ) Whether the requester has a commercial interest that would be furthered by the requested disclosure, and
( 5 ) Whether the magnitude of the identified commercial interest of the requester is sufficiently large, in comparison with the public interest in disclosure, that disclosure is primarily in the commercial interest of the requester.
( b ) A fee waiver request must indicate the existence and magnitude of any commercial interest that the requester has in the records that are the subject of the request.
#### § 176.1 Service of summons.

When an action is initiated in the Court of International Trade a copy of the summons will be served in the manner prescribed by the Court of International Trade upon the CBP official(s) who denied the protest(s), and an additional copy will be served upon the Assistant Chief Counsel for Court of International Trade Litigation, United States Customs and Border Protection, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, N.Y. 10007.

[CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93025, Dec. 20, 2016]
#### Fanny T. Rowles, Respondent, v. Sanford A. Davison, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

*1025Present — Close, P. J. Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-034 March 24, 2003

NRC RELEASES DRAFT FINAL VERSION

 OF YUCCA MOUNTAIN REVIEW PLAN

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is making publicly available a draft final version of the

plan it would use to review an expected application from the Department of Energy (DOE) to construct

a high-level nuclear waste geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. 

The principal purpose of the Yucca Mountain Review Plan would be to ensure the quality and

uniformity of the NRC staff’s reviews. A previous draft of the plan was released in March 2002, and

public comments were invited during a 5-month public comment period that ended August 12 of last

year. The staff also conducted three public meetings in Nevada on the draft plan to solicit comments. 

Approximately 1000 comments were received, including comments from the NRC’s Advisory

Committee on Nuclear Waste.

The current draft version is being made available today for information - - not for comment. It

has not yet received Commission approval and is subject to change by the NRC. If the Commission

approves the plan, the NRC will issue the final version and publish an associated Federal Register

notice that will include a summary of public comments received and changes made to the March 2002

draft.

The plan has separate sections for potential reviews of repository safety before permanent

closure, safety after permanent closure, the research and development program to resolve safety

questions, the performance confirmation program and administrative and programmatic requirements. 

Each of these sections would define how NRC would review DOE's compliance with NRC regulations.

The "Yucca Mountain Review Plan, Draft Final Revision 2,” is available electronically through

the NRC's website at http://www.nrc.gov/waste/hlw-disposal/regs-guides-comm.html .

###
Order entered November 6, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 01356
- CV STEVE HENSON, M.D. , ET AL. , Appellant s V. GRUBER HURST JOHANSE N HAIL SHANK, LLP, Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 13
- 00553 

### O RDER
We GRANT appellants’ October 22, 2014 motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. The notice of appeal filed with the trial court on October 22, 2014 is deemed timely for juris dictional purposes.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
#### Millie L. Hayman, Respondent, v. The City of New York and Another, Defendants. Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant.

Motions denied, without costs. Present — Burr, Thomas, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Anworth MortgageAsset Corporation 

Santa Monica, California 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-110744, No. 333-115392 and No. 333-143173) and Form S-8 (No. 333-70478, No. 333-96563, No. 333-104227and No. 333-129528) of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation of our reports dated March 12, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules, and the effectiveness of Anworth Mortgage AssetCorporation’s internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

BDO Seidman, LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

March 12, 2008
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 47612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19246]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 157 / Thursday, August 14, 2014 / 
Notices

[[Page 47612]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service

Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to 
Washington State Crop Improvement Association of Pullman, Washington, 
an exclusive license to the chickpea variety named ``Royal.''

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 15, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mojdeh Bahar of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's rights in this 
plant variety are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this plant variety as Washington State Crop 
Improvement Association of Pullman, Washington has submitted a complete 
and sufficient application for a license. The prospective exclusive 
license will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and 
conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive 
license may be granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of 
this published Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives 
written evidence and argument which establishes that the grant of the 
license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 
and 37 CFR 404.7.

Mojdeh Bahar,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-19246 Filed 8-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
```
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-04-034 June 24, 2004

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC PROPOSES $7,500 FINE AGAINST CONNECTICUT COMPANY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $7,500 civil penalty against

Pepperidge Farm, Inc., of Norwalk, Conn., for violations associated with the loss of a device

containing radioactive material. 

The NRC staff conducted a special inspection on March 3 to review the circumstances

associated with the loss of a moisture sensor device containing 36 millicuries of cesium-137. 

The State of Connecticut had notified the agency that the device was missing from a closed

facility and believed to have been sent to a salvage yard with other material for recycling. At the

salvage yard, the device would have been shredded, bailed and sent with other scrap metal to a

metal processing company. Although searches were performed to locate the device, it was never

found. 

Following the NRC inspection, the NRC offered the company the opportunity to meet for

an enforcement conference to discuss the apparent violations and discuss the company’s

corrective actions. The company declined the meeting, but responded in writing. The

company’s corrective actions, which are considered prompt and comprehensive, include

conducting an inventory and searches for remaining equipment at its facilities, conducting

searches of the salvage yard, alerting two metal processing companies of the potentially

contaminated metal, and revising company procedures to include requirements for ensuring

proper disposal of NRC licensed devices. 

In a letter to the company, Region I Administrator, Hubert J. Miller said, "The NRC

considers the failure to control licensed radioactive material to be a serious matter." He said, the

violation is of concern to the NRC because "the failure to control the device resulted in the likely

entry of radioactive material into the metal recycling process." But, because the device was

apparently sent directly to the salvage yard and likely shredded, "the potential for a substantial

radiation dose to individuals is considerably lower than if the device were lost intact."
-2-

Pepperidge Farm was cited and a fine proposed for failing to maintain control of the

device containing radioactive material. The company was also cited for three other violations for

which a fine was not assessed. 

 

The company has 30 days from receipt of the letter to either pay the civil penalty or

protest its imposition.

The notice to the company of the proposed fine and the notice of violation are available

from the Region I Office of Public Affairs and on the NRC’s web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/regulatory/enforcement/current.html#materials 

###
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Sophie Katz, as Administratrix of the Estate of Morris Katz, Deceased, Appellant. Edith Katz, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### § 1312.1 Purpose and authority.

This subpart sets forth the procedures for the classification and declassification of national security information in the possession of the Office of Management and Budget. It is issued under the authority of Executive Order 12958, (60 FR 19825, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., P.333), as implemented by Information Security Oversight Office Directive No. 1 (32 CFR part 2001), and is applicable to all OMB employees.
§ 182.11 Filing of claim for preferential tariff treatment upon importation. ( a ) *Basis of claim.* An importer may make a claim for USMCA preferential tariff treatment, including an exemption from the merchandise processing fee, based on a written or electronic certification of origin, as specified in § 182.12, completed by the importer, exporter, or producer for the purpose of certifying that a good qualifies as an originating good.
( b ) *Making a claim.* The claim is made by including on the entry summary, or equivalent documentation, or by the method specified for equivalent reporting via a CBP-authorized electronic data interchange system, the letters “S” or “S+” as a prefix to the subheading of the HTSUS under which each originating good is classified.
( c ) *Corrected claim.* If, after making the claim specified in paragraph (b) of this section, the importer has reason to believe that the certification of origin is based on inaccurate information or is otherwise invalid, the importer must promptly and voluntarily correct the claim or certification of origin, pay any duties that may be due, and submit a statement either in writing to the CBP office where the original claim was filed or via a CBP-authorized electronic data interchange system in accordance with § 182.124 of this part (*see* §§ 182.122 and 182.124 of this part).
[CBP Dec. 21-10, 86 FR 35584, July 6, 2021]
<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 99.1

            CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
       OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Ambient Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, John J. Joyce, Chief Executive
Officer (and Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



MARCH 31, 2003                        /s/ JOHN J. JOYCE
                                      ---------------------------------
                                      JOHN J. JOYCE
                                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                      (AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Ambient Corporation and will be
retained by Ambient Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 03-142 November 4, 2003

NRC ISSUES DIRECT FINAL RULE MODIFYING REQUIREMENTS FOR NUCLEAR

POWER PLANT DECOMMISSIONING TRUST FUNDS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is amending regulations regarding decommissioning trust

provisions for nuclear power plants to clarify the agency’s intentions and correct administrative errors

in a final rule published last year.

The agency is issuing a direct final rule to make immediate corrections in the final rule

published December 24, 2002, in the Federal Register, which established objectives and criteria for

decommissioning trust agreements. That rule required licensees that are no longer rate-regulated, or

who no longer have access to government-mandated fees for decommissioning, to have

decommissioning trust agreements in a form acceptable to the NRC in order to increase assurance that

an adequate amount of decommissioning funds will be available. The rule is to become effective

December 24, 2003.

Changes imposed in the direct final rule to be published shortly in the Federal Register will

clarify that payments for administrative expenses incurred by trust funds do not require notification to

the NRC. The direct final rule also clarifies that licensees will have the option to retain their existing

license conditions relating to decommissioning trust agreements. Finally, the changes clarify that

decommissioning trust funds are not to be invested in other companies that own nuclear power plants.

Because the NRC considers this action non-controversial and routine, the agency is using the

direct final rule procedure rather than the lengthier, standard rulemaking process. However, if the NRC

receives significant adverse comments within 30 days of the direct final rule’s publication in the

Federal Register, the NRC will publish a document that withdraws this action and will address the

comments in a subsequent final rule.

Comments may be submitted to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. Comments may also

be submitted online through the NRC’s interactive rulemaking site at http://ruleforum.llnl.gov .

For further information, contact Brian J. Richter, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, at (301)

415-1978, or e-mail to bjr@nrc.gov .

###
69–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 110–816 

PROVIDING FOR PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PERIOD 

FROM AUGUST 1, 2008, THROUGH SEPTEMBER 4, 2008 

JULY 31, 2008.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1399] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1399, by a vote of 8 to 4, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides that when the House adjourns on any 

legislative day from August 1, 2008 through September 4, 2008, it 

shall stand adjourned until 11 a.m. on the third day thereafter. 

The resolution provides that the Speaker may appoint Members to 

perform the duties of the Chair for that time period as though 

under clause 8(a) of rule I. It provides that the Speaker may dispense with legislative business on each legislative day during that 

time period (other than proceedings under clause 6 of rule XV). It 

provides that on each legislative day during that time period the 

Journal of the proceedings of each previous legislative day shall be 

considered as approved. It provides that on each legislative day of 

that period, unless the Speaker determines otherwise under section 

3 of this resolution, after the third daily order of business under 

clause 1 of rule XIV, the House shall stand adjourned pursuant to 

the first section of this resolution. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 582 

Date: July 31, 2008. 


rmajette on PRODPC74 with HEARING
2 

Measure: H.Res. 1399. 

Motion by: Mr. Dreier. 

Summary of motion: To add a new section at the end of the resolution stating that this resolution will not be in effect until the 

House considers H.R. 6566. 

Results: Defeated 4–8. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—NAY; Hastings (FL)—NAY; Matsui—NAY; Cardoza—NAY; Welch—NAY; Castor—NAY; Arcuri— NAY; Sutton—NAY; Dreier—YEA; Diaz-Balart—YEA; Hastings 

(WA)—YEA; Sessions—YEA. 

Rules Committee record vote No. 583 

Date: July 31, 2008. 

Measure: H.Res. 1399. 

Motion by: Mr. Hastings (FL). 

Summary of motion: To report the rule. 

Results: Adopted 8–4. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—YEA; Hastings (FL)—YEA; Matsui—YEA; Cardoza—YEA; Welch—YEA; Castor—YEA; Arcuri— YEA; Sutton—YEA; Dreier—NAY; Diaz-Balart—NAY; Hastings 

(WA)—NAY; Sessions—NAY. 

Æ 


rmajette on PRODPC74 with HEARING
§ 1206.4 Notice of meeting. ( a ) Notice of a Board meeting will be published in the Federal Register at least one week before the meeting. Each notice will include the following information: ( 1 ) The time of the meeting;
( 2 ) The place where the meeting will be held;
( 3 ) The subject and agenda of the meeting;
( 4 ) Whether the meeting is to be open to the public or closed; and
( 5 ) The name and telephone number of a Board official responsible for receiving inquiries regarding the meeting.
( b ) The Board, by majority vote, may provide less than one week's notice. When it does so, however, it will provide notice of the meeting at the earliest practicable time.
§ 201.3a Missing children information. ( a ) Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3220, penalty mail sent by the Commission may be used to assist in the location and recovery of missing children. This section establishes procedures for such use and is applicable on a Commission-wide basis. The Commission's Office of Facilities Management, telephone 202-205-2741, shall be the point of contact for matters related to the implementation of this section.
( b ) Missing children information shall be inserted in or affixed to such mailings of Commission monthly calendars, notices, press releases, and other documents as the Commission may direct. Such missing children information shall be obtained exclusively from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
( c ) The procedure established in subsection (b) above will result in missing childern information being inserted in an estimated 25 percent of the Commission's penalty mail and will cost an estimated $1,500 for the first year of implementation. The Director of Administration shall make such changes in the procedure as he deems appropriate to maximize the use of missing children information in the Commission's mail.
[51 FR 25195, July 11, 1986, as amended at 68 FR 32974, June 3, 2003]
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-40444 Summary Calendar

ALLEN TYRONE ROBINSON

Plaintiff - Appellant

VERSUS

DEVIN MUSSELMAN, Lieutenant, Coffield Unit

Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Eastern District of Texas

(6:94-CV-176) April 23, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Robinson, a state prisoner, appeals the dismissal of his civil

rights sui t requesting a jury trial and asserting an excessiveforce claim. We vacate and remand.

The district cou rt’s dismissal was based upon fact-findings

made by the magistrate judge following a hearing pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Flowers v. Phelps

, 956 F.2d 488 (5th

Cir.), modified on other grounds

, 964 F.2d 400 (5th Cir. 1992).2

Robinson argues that he was denied his right to have his case tried

by a jury and we agree. He raised this issue in his objections to

the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation. The district

court overruled the objection in reliance upon C asperone v.

Landmark Oil and Gas Corp. , 819 F.2d 112, 116 (5th Cir. 1987)

because Robinson failed to raise an objection at the Flowers

hearing. That case held that plaintiff waived a jury trial by

failing to attend the pretrial conference.

The question presented is whether Robinson’s failure to object

at the Flowers hearin g resulted in a waiver of his jury demand.

Our recent decision in McAfee v. Martin , 63 F.3d 436, 437-38 (5th

Cir. 1995) shows that he did not. On this record it is clear that

the failure to object was not a knowing and voluntary waiver of the

right to jury trial. The magistrate judge described the hearing as

“an expanded evidentiary hearing pursuant to Flowers

. . .” and, as

Robinson was pro se, it does not appear that he was aware of the

meaning of a Flowers hearing.

VACATED and REMANDED.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—NOAA HYDROGRAPHIC SERVICES