alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2422.15 Do parties have a duty to provide information and cooperate after a petition is filed? ( a ) *Relevant information.* After you file a petition, all parties must, upon request of the Regional Director, provide the Regional Director and serve all parties affected by issues raised in the petition with information concerning parties, issues, and agreements raised in or affected by the petition.
( b ) *Inclusions and exclusions.* After you file a petition seeking an election, the Regional Director may direct the agency or activity to provide the Regional Director and all parties affected by issues raised in the petition with a current alphabetized list of employees and job classifications included in and/or excluded from the existing or claimed unit affected by issues raised in the petition.
( c ) *Cooperation.* All parties are required to cooperate in every aspect of the representation process. This obligation includes cooperating fully with the Regional Director, submitting all required and requested information, and participating in prehearing conferences and hearings. The Regional Director may take appropriate action, including dismissal of the petition or denial of intervention, if parties fail to cooperate in the representation process.
§ 1653.12 Qualifying legal processes. ( a ) The TSP record keeper will only honor the terms of a legal process that is qualifying under paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) A legal process must meet each of the following requirements to be considered qualifying: ( 1 ) A competent authority must have issued the legal process;
( 2 ) The legal process must expressly relate to the Thrift Savings Plan account of a TSP participant, as described in § 1653.2(a)(1);
( 3 ) The legal process must require the TSP to: ( i ) Pay a stated dollar amount from a participant's TSP account; or
( ii ) Freeze the participant's account in anticipation of an order to pay from the account.
( c ) The following legal processes are not qualifying: ( 1 ) A legal process relating to a TSP account that has been closed;
( 2 ) A legal process relating to a TSP account that contains only nonvested money;
( 3 ) A legal process requiring the return to the TSP of money that was properly paid pursuant to an earlier legal process;
( 4 ) A legal process requiring the TSP to make a payment in the future; and
( 5 ) A legal process requiring a series of payments.
( 6 ) A legal process that designates the specific TSP core fund, source of contributions, or balance from which the payment or portions of the payment shall be made.
[68 FR 35510, June 13, 2003, as amended at 77 FR 26429, May 4, 2012; 87 FR 31690, May 24, 2022]
#### § 2421.13 Certification.

*Certification* means the determination by the Authority, its agents or representatives, of the results of an election, or the results of a petition to consolidate existing exclusively recognized units.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-55324) pertaining to the Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors of EXE
Technologies, Inc.; the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-55320) pertaining to the 1997 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan of EXE Technologies, Inc.;
and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-57332) pertaining to the Former AllPoints Systems 1996 Stock Option Plan, of our report dated January 29, 2002,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of EXE Technologies, Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.



Dallas,
Texas
March 26, 2002

---

QuickLinks
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-04-051 December 1, 2004

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO DISCUSS FINAL DECOMMISSIONING OF 

TWIN CITIES ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting on Dec. 8 to discuss the

status of decommissioning activities at the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant in Arden Hills, Minn.

The plant which formerly manufactured ammunition containing depleted uranium, is located near

Arden Hills.

The meeting will be held at 6:30 p.m. at the Arden Hills City Hall, 1245 Highway 96, Arden

Hills.

The NRC’s presentation will focus on the NRC’s final review of decommissioning activities 

associated with the use of depleted uranium in and around Building 502 of the Twin Cities Army

Ammunition Plant. Members of the public will have an opportunity to ask questions and make comments

during the meeting.

Decommissioning activities at the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant have been conducted

by Alliant Techsystems, Inc., since 2001. Between 2001 and 2004, the NRC conducted 12 inspections

to ensure compliance with the NRC’s regulations and details of the decommissioning plan. Inspection

reports are available through Region III Public Affairs Office.

###
#### § 2424.27 Additional submissions to the Authority.

The Authority will not consider any submission filed by any party other than those authorized under this part, provided however that the Authority may, in its discretion, grant permission to file an additional submission based on a written request showing extraordinary circumstances by any party. The additional submission must be filed with the written request. All documents filed under this section must be served in accord with § 2424.2(g).

[88 FR 62458, Sept. 12, 2023]
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-03-051 December 22, 2003

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC SENDS INSPECTION TEAM TO ILLINOIS FUEL PLANT

TO REVIEW CAUSE OF RADIOACTIVE CHEMICAL RELEASE

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspectors from the agency’s Atlanta regional office have been

dispatched to the Honeywell International nuclear fuel processing plant near Metropolis, Illinois,

following a gaseous chemical release containing radioactivity early this morning.

 Luis A. Reyes, administrator of the NRC’s Region II office in Atlanta, said an alarm indicated that

there was a release of uranium hexaflouride (UF-6) from a valve in one of the plant’s chemical process

lines at 2:24 a.m. (cst). The release was terminated at 3:20 a.m. (cst). He said uranium hexaflouride

is a potentially hazardous chemical containing low levels of radioactivity. The Honeywell plant takes

solid uranium and converts it to a form that can be enriched.

 Reyes said initial reports to the NRC indicated that there were no injuries at the plant, but three

individuals offsite were taken to the hospital. Two have been released, and the third is being evaluated

further prior to release. About 25 people offsite were temporarily evacuated and some 75 persons

remained sheltered for a time in their homes.

 The company declared a Site Area Emergency at 3:00 a.m. (cst) which was terminated at 6:50 a.m.

(cst). 

 Reyes said the company has determined that probable human error and malfunctioning equipment,

not a deliberate act, were the cause of the problem. He said the company has taken air samples to

evaluate the amount of material released. The results are expected to be available later today.

 The NRC resident inspector from the nearby Paducah, Kentucky, gaseous diffusion plant responded

to the Metropolis site and is monitoring recovery operations from the plant’s emergency operations

center. Two additional NRC inspectors have been dispatched from Atlanta to further evaluate the

cause of the event. NRC officials in the agency’s emergency response centers in Washington, D.C.

and Atlanta are continuing to monitor the company’s recovery actions.

 Reyes said the plant will not resume operation without NRC concurrence. He said that the plant

experienced an offsite chemical release of antimony pentaflouride, not related to the uranium process,

on September 12, and gaseous releases of hydrogen flouride on September 9, and uranium
-2-

hexaflouride on September 30, both of which were contained onsite. The NRC performed an onsite

inspection following those events and determined, based upon the information presented to the

inspectors, that the facility had taken sufficient corrective action.

 ###
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65141-65142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27424]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 2076]


Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 113 (Expansion of Service 
Area) Under Alternative Site Framework, Ellis County, Texas

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Act provides for ``. . . the 
establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of 
entry;
    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 
CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization 
of zones;
    Whereas, the Ellis County Trade Zone Corporation, grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone 113, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ 
Docket B-37-2018, docketed June 4, 2018) for authority to expand the 
service area of the zone to include Navarro County, Texas, as described 
in the application, adjacent to the Dallas/Fort Worth Customs and 
Border Protection port of entry;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (83 FR 26947, June 11, 2018) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the

[[Page 65142]]

requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize FTZ 113 to expand the service area 
under the ASF is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.13, and to the Board's standard 
2,000-acre activation limit for the zone.

    Dated: December 13, 2018.
Christian B. Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-27424 Filed 12-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-05-026 June 17, 2005

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has promoted Terry Jackson to senior resident

inspector at the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant, located in San Luis Obispo, Calif.

“Terry Jackson has served the agency and the local community well as resident inspector

at Diablo Canyon and I am confident that he will continue to do so as our senior inspector at the

site,” said NRC Regional Administrator Bruce S. Mallet.

Jackson, who has been a resident inspector at Diablo Canyon since 2000, will work with

Tim McConnell, a resident inspector at the plant.

Jackson first joined the NRC in 1993 as a digital instrumentation and control engineer at

NRC headquarters in Rockville, Md., and transferred to Region IV in 2000. He earned a

Bachelor of Science degree in computer engineering at Clemson University in 1993, and a

Master of Science degree in electrical engineering at Virginia Tech in 1996. He lives with his

wife and daughter in Atascadero, Calif.

Each of the country’s commercial nuclear plants has resident inspectors who serve as the

agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring significant work

projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. The resident inspectors at Diablo

Canyon can be reached at: (805) 595-2354.

###
#### § 1303.2 Authority and functions.

The general functions of OMB, as provided by statute and by executive order, are to develop and to execute the budget, oversee implementation of Administration policies and programs, advise and assist the President, and develop and implement management policies for the government.
### §6907. State legislation requiring reallocation or redistribution of payments to smaller units of general purpose government

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, a State may enact legislation which requires that any payments which would be made to units of general local government pursuant to this chapter be reallocated and redistributed in whole or part to other smaller units of general purpose government which (1) are located within the boundaries of the larger unit of general local government, (2) provide general governmental services and (3) contain entitlement lands within their boundaries. Such reallocation or redistribution shall generally reflect the level of services provided by, and the number of entitlement acres within, the smaller unit of general local government.

(b) Upon enactment of legislation by a State, described in subsection (a), the Secretary shall make one payment to such State equaling the aggregate amount of payments which he otherwise would have made to units of general local government within such State pursuant to this chapter. It shall be the responsibility of such State to make any further distribution of the payment pursuant to subsection (a). Such redistribution shall be made within 30 days after receipt of such payment. No payment, or portion thereof, made by the Secretary shall be used by any State for the administration of this subsection or subsection (a).

(c) Appropriations made for payments in lieu of taxes for a fiscal year may be used to correct underpayments in the previous fiscal year to achieve equity among all qualified recipients.

(Added Pub. L. 98–63, title I, July 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 324; amended Pub. L. 103–272, §4(f)(1)(U)(ii), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1362.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–272 inserted section catchline.
§ 10002.2 Definitions. The following definitions apply in this part: *Chairperson* means the Chairperson of the Council, as appointed by the President, or any person to whom the Council has delegated authority for the matter concerned.
*Council* means the National Council on Disability, established by the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 780 *et seq.*), as amended, and amended by the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (Pub. L. 113-128) in 2014.
*General Counsel* means the Council's principal legal advisor, or his or her designee.
*Meeting* means the deliberations of five or more Council members that determine or result in the joint conduct or disposition of official Council business. A meeting does not include: ( 1 ) Notational voting or similar consideration of business for the purpose of recording votes, whether by circulation of material to members' individually in writing or by a polling of the members individually by phone or email.
( 2 ) Action by five or more members to: ( i ) Open or close a meeting or to release or withhold information pursuant to § 10002.6;
( ii ) Set an agenda for a proposed meeting;
( iii ) Call a meeting on less than seven days' notice, as permitted by § 10002.4; or
( iv ) Change the subject matter or the determination to open or to close a publicly announced meeting under § 10002.7.
( 3 ) A session attended by five or more members for the purpose of having the Council's staff or expert consultants, another federal agency, or other persons or organizations brief or otherwise provide information to the Council concerning any matters within the purview of the Council, provided that the members do not engage in deliberations that determine or result in the joint conduct or disposition of official business on such matters.
( 4 ) A gathering of members for the purpose of holding informal, preliminary discussions or exchanges of views which do not effectively predetermine official action.
*Member* means an individual duly appointed and confirmed to the Council.
*Public observation* means attendance by the public at a meeting of the Council, but does not include public participation.
*Public participation* means the presentation or discussion of information, raising of questions, or other manner of involvement in a meeting of the Council by the public in a manner that contributes to the disposition of official Council business.
*Sunshine Act* means the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.
### §1254a. Research on effects of pollutants

In carrying out the provisions of section 1254(a) of this title, the Administrator shall conduct research on the harmful effects on the health and welfare of persons caused by pollutants in water, in conjunction with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and other Federal, State, and interstate agencies carrying on such research. Such research shall include, and shall place special emphasis on, the effect that bioaccumulation of these pollutants in aquatic species has upon reducing the value of aquatic commercial and sport industries. Such research shall further study methods to reduce and remove these pollutants from the relevant affected aquatic species so as to restore and enhance these valuable resources.

(Pub. L. 100–4, title I, §105, Feb. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 15.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Quality Act of 1987, and not as part of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definition

Administrator means the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, see section 1(d) of Pub. L. 100–4, set out as a note under section 1251 of this title.
### §6543. Designation of reporters

The reporters of debates in the office of the Secretary of the Senate are hereby designated the official reporters of debates of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 89–545, Aug. 27, 1966, 80 Stat. 354.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 126–2 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
PUBLIC LAW 106–356—OCT. 24, 2000 114 STAT. 1391

Public Law 106–356

106th Congress

An Act

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to clarify the

areas included in the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park and

to authorize appropriations for that park.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dayton Aviation Heritage

Preservation Amendments Act of 2000’’.

SEC. 2. REVISION OF DAYTON AVIATION HERITAGE PRESERVATION

ACT OF 1992.

(a) AREAS INCLUDED IN PARK.—Section 101(b) of the Dayton

Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 410ww(b))

is amended to read as follows:

‘‘(b) AREAS INCLUDED.—The park shall consist of the following

sites, as generally depicted on a map entitled ‘Dayton Aviation

Heritage National Historical Park’, numbered 362–80,010 and dated

September 1, 2000:

‘‘(1) A core parcel in Dayton, Ohio, which shall consist

of the Wright Cycle Company building, Hoover Block, and

lands between.

‘‘(2) The Setzer building property (also known as the Aviation Trail building property), Dayton, Ohio.

‘‘(3) The residential properties at 26 South Williams Street

and at 30 South Williams Street, Dayton, Ohio.

‘‘(4) Huffman Prairie Flying Field, located at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.

‘‘(5) The Wright 1905 Flyer III and Wright Hall, including

constructed additions and attached structures, known collectively as the John W. Berry, Sr. Wright Brothers Aviation

Center, Dayton, Ohio.

‘‘(6) The Paul Laurence Dunbar State Memorial, Dayton,

Ohio.’’.

(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 109 of such

Act (16 U.S.C. 410ww–8) is amended by striking the colon after

‘‘title’’ and all that follows through the end of the sentence and

inserting a period.

Ohio

16 USC 410ww

note.

Dayton Aviation

Heritage

Preservation

Amendments Act

of 2000.

Oct. 24, 2000

[H.R. 5036]

114 STAT. 1392 PUBLIC LAW 106–356—OCT. 24, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5036 (S. 2959):

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106–896 (Comm. on Resources).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 106–443 accompanying S. 2959 (Comm. on Energy and

Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Sept. 26, considered and passed House.

Oct. 5, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

(c) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 107 of such Act (16 U.S.C.

410ww–6) is amended by striking ‘‘Secretary of Interior’’ and

inserting ‘‘Secretary of the Interior’’.

Approved October 24, 2000.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 1580

LUSCIOUS GRAHAM , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. ANTERO RESOURCES CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Clarksburg

. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv - 00026

- FPS

- MJA )

Submitted : February 20, 2018 Decided: March 8, 2018

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Luscious Graham, Appellant Pro Se. W. Henry Lawrence, IV, Justin Aaron Rubenstein, Amy Marie Smith, STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC, Bridgeport, West Virg inia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Luscious Graham filed a civil action in West Virginia state court, which the
D efendant removed to federal district court based on diversity jurisdiction. T he district court denied Graham’s subsequent motion to remand to state court and ultimately g ranted summary judgment to the D efendant. Graham’s sole challenge on appeal is to the district court’s order finding diversity jurisdiction and denying her motion to remand . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Graham v. Antero Res. Corp. , No. 1:16

- cv - 00026

- FPS

- MJA (N.D.W. Va. Ju ly 26, 2016 ; Apr. 7, 2017 ) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED