alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 454

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1598 

[Report No. 108–244] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 16, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

MARCH 9, 2004

Reported by Mr. DOMENICI, without amendment 

AN ACT

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in projects within the San 

Diego Creek Watershed, California, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Irvine Basin Surface 

5 and Groundwater Improvement Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 1598 RS 

1 SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and 

3 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102–

4 575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by 

5 inserting after section 1635 the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 1636. IRVINE BASIN GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE 

7 WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. 

8 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera9 tion with the Irvine Ranch Water District, California, is 

10 authorized to participate in the design, planning, and con11 struction of projects to naturally treat impaired surface 

12 water, reclaim and reuse impaired groundwater, and pro13 vide brine disposal within the San Diego Creek Watershed. 

14 ‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the costs 

15 of the projects authorized by this section shall not exceed 

16 25 percent of the total cost. 

17 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide 

18 funds for the operation or maintenance of a project au19 thorized by this section.’’. 

20 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

21 in section 2 of the Reclamation Projects Authorization and 

22 Adjustment Act of 1992 is amended by inserting after the 

23 item relating to section 1635 the following:

‘‘1636. Irvine basin groundwater and surface water improvement projects.’’. 

Calendar No. 454

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1598

[Report No. 108–244] 

AN ACT

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and 

Groundwater Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in projects within the San Diego Creek Watershed, California, and for other purposes. 

MARCH 9, 2004

Reported without amendment
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-006 January 20, 2004

NRC APPROVES POWER UPRATE FOR FORT CALHOUN

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a request by the Omaha Public Power

District to increase the generating capacity of the Fort Calhoun nuclear power facility by 1.6 percent. 

The NRC staff determined that the licensee could safely increase the power output of the reactor

primarily through increased feedwater flow measurement accuracy.

The power uprate at the plant, located near Omaha, Nebraska, increases the generating capacity

from 478 to 485 megawatts electric. The licensee intends to implement the uprate by the middle of

February.

NRC previously published a notice about the power uprate application in the Federal Register,

providing the public an opportunity to comment or request a hearing. No comments or hearing

requests were received by the NRC.

 The NRC’s safety evaluation of the requested power uprate focused on several areas, including

nuclear steam supply systems, instrumentation and control systems, electrical systems, accident

evaluations, radiological consequences, operations, and other technical specification changes.

###
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (i)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s / Michael J. RossMichael J. RossPresident and Chief Executive Officer,Dearborn Bancorp, Inc.
 43
### §654. Study by Government Accountability Office of forms of Federal financial commitment not reviewed annually by Congress

The Government Accountability Office shall study those provisions of law which provide mandatory spending and report to the Congress its recommendations for the appropriate form of financing for activities or programs financed by such provisions not later than eighteen months after December 12, 1985. Such report shall be revised from time to time.

(Pub. L. 93–344, title IV, §404, formerly §405, as added Pub. L. 99–177, title II, §214, Dec. 12, 1985, 99 Stat. 1059; renumbered §404 and amended Pub. L. 105–33, title X, §10116(c)(1), (2), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 692; Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 404 of Pub. L. 93–344, which is not classified to the Code, was renumbered section 403 by Pub. L. 105–33, title X, §10116(c)(1), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 692.

#### Amendments

2004—Pub. L. 108–271 substituted "Government Accountability Office" for "General Accounting Office" in section catchline and text.

1997—Pub. L. 105–33, §10116(c)(2), substituted "mandatory spending" for "spending authority as described by section 651(c)(2) of this title and which provide permanent appropriations,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 12, 1985, and applicable with respect to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 1985, see section 275(a)(1) of Pub. L. 99–177, formerly set out as an Effective and Termination Dates note under section 900 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 112–25, title I, §104(a), Aug. 2, 2011, 125 Stat. 246.
### §305. Federal Financing Bank

The Federal Financing Bank, established under section 4 of the Federal Financing Bank Act of 1973 (12 U.S.C. 2283), is subject to the direction and supervision of the Secretary of the Treasury.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 879.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 305 | (no source). | |

The section is included to provide in subchapter I of chapter 3 of the revised title a complete list of the organizational units established by law that are in the Department of the Treasury or are subject to the direction and supervision of the Secretary of the Treasury.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Planet Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Scott L.
Glenn as Chief Executive Officer and Leslie White as Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 13, 2005

/s/ Scott Glenn
-----------------------
Scott L. Glenn
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Leslie White
-----------------------
Leslie White
Chief Financial Officer

                                       15
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 759 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 759

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the credit for 
                      production of refined coal.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 16, 2021

Mr. Hoeven (for himself and Mr. Cramer) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the credit for 
                      production of refined coal.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF REFINED COAL PRODUCTION TAX CREDIT.

    (a) Extension of Period During Which Refined Coal Can Be 
Produced.--Section 45(e)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(E) Extension of credit period for certain 
                refined coal facilities.--In the case of a refined coal 
                production facility which does not produce steel 
                industry fuel and which is placed in service before 
                January 1, 2012, clauses (i) and (ii)(II) of 
                subparagraph (A) shall each be applied by substituting 
                `20-year period' for `10-year period'.''.
    (b) Extension of Period During Which Refined Coal Facilities Can Be 
Qualified.--Subparagraph (B) of section 45(d)(8) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``placed in service after'' and inserting 
        ``placed in service--
                            ``(i) after'';
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``, 
        or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(ii) after December 31, 2020, and before 
                        January 1, 2024.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to coal produced and sold after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, in taxable years ending after such date.
                                 <all>
```
### SUBCHAPTER III—NEW YORK HARBOR, HARBOR OF HAMPTON ROADS, AND HARBOR OF BALTIMORE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JESSE SMOOT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 98 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JESSE SMOOT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 99 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JESSE SMOOT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 100 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 101 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court
[98 MAL 2021, 99 MAL 2021, 100 MAL 2021, 101 MAL 2021, 102 MAL 2021, 103 MAL 

2021, 104 MAL 2021 and 105 MAL 2021] - 2

JESSE SMOOT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JESSE SMOOT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 102 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JESSE SMOOT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 103 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JESSE SMOOT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 104 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

No. 105 MAL 2021
[98 MAL 2021, 99 MAL 2021, 100 MAL 2021, 101 MAL 2021, 102 MAL 2021, 103 MAL 

2021, 104 MAL 2021 and 105 MAL 2021] - 3

v.

JESSE SMOOT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

In this case, where Petitioner was without counsel for three of the four month pretrial period in the Court of Common Pleas, did the Superior Court misapply United 

States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984), when it affirmed the denial of PCRA relief 

because Petitioner did not identity [sic] a “critical stage” during which Petitioner 

was without counsel?
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent,

v.

EDGAR C. PACHECO,

Appellant.

No. 68851-1-1

DIVISION ONE

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

FILED: MAR 0 4 2013

Per Curiam. - Edgar Pacheco appeals his conviction for felony

harassment. He contends the information was defective for failing to allege that

he made a "true threat." His contention is controlled by the State Supreme

Court's recent decision in State v. Allen, No. 86119-6, 2013 WL 259383 (Wash.

Jan. 24, 2013) ("true threat" concept defines the threat element of an offense; it is

not itself an element that must be included in either the information or the toconvict instruction).

Affirmed.

For the court:

TMp CM

4rO CC %SL, ,,wl&r ^ 3C
11-i

CHAPTER 11. LIFE-CYCLE COST SUBGROUP ANALYSIS 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

11.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 11-1 

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0010 COMMENT 20.3
11-1 

CHAPTER 11. LIFE-CYCLE COST SUBGROUP ANALYSIS 

11.1 INTRODUCTION 

The life-cycle cost (LCC) subgroup analysis evaluates impacts on any identifiable groups 

or consumers who may be disproportionately affected by any national energy conservation 

standard level. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will conduct this analysis as one of the 

analyses for the notice of proposed rulemaking. DOE will accomplish this, in part, by analyzing 

the LCC and payback periods (PBPs) for those consumers that fall into any identifiable groups. 

DOE plans to evaluate variations in regional energy prices and variations in energy use that 

might affect the net present value of a standard to consumer subpopulations. To the extent 

possible, DOE will obtain estimates of each input parameter’s variability and will consider this 

variability in its calculation of consumer impacts. DOE plans to perform sensitivity analyses to 

consider how differences in energy use will affect subgroups of consumers. 

DOE will determine the impact on consumer subgroups using the LCC Spreadsheet 

Model, which allows for different data inputs. The standard LCC analysis (described in chapter 

8) focuses on the households that use room air conditioners and clothes dryers. DOE can use the 

LCC Spreadsheet Model to analyze the LCC for any subgroup by sampling only that subgroup. 

(Chapter 8 explains in detail the inputs to the model used in determining LCC and PBPs.) 

In the case of room air conditioners and clothes dryers, possible subgroups DOE may 

choose to consider are: (1) low-income households, and (2) senior citizens. 

DOE does not apply a rebound effect in the LCC subgroup analysis for the reasons 

discussed in chapter 8 (i.e., there is no net change in overall consumer benefit with or without the 

rebound effect). 

DOE will be especially sensitive to increases in the purchase price of the product due to 

new standards, to avoid negative impacts on identifiable population groups that may not be able 

to afford significant increases in product price. For such consumers that are sensitive to price 

increases, increases in first costs of a product can preclude the purchase of a new model of that 

product. As a result, some consumers may retain products past their useful life. These older 

products are generally less efficient to begin with, and their efficiency may deteriorate further if 

they are retained beyond their useful life. Increases in first cost also can preclude the purchase 

and use of a product altogether, resulting in a potentially large loss of utility to the consumer. 

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0010 COMMENT 20.3
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-41991) pertaining to the MPW Industrial Services Group, Inc. 1997,
1994 and 1991 Stock Option Plans of our report dated September 10, 2001, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of MPW Industrial Services
Group, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June
30, 2001.


                                             /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Columbus, Ohio
September 25, 2001
#### Ella Pearl Elliott, as Executrix, etc., Respondent, v. William W. Niles and Another, etc., Appellants.

Motion denied, without costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER V—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, EDUCATION, AND INNOVATION
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1572

To designate the historic Federal District Court Building located at 100 

North Palafox Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ‘‘Winston E. Arnow 

Federal Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2003

Mr. MILLER of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To designate the historic Federal District Court Building 

located at 100 North Palafox Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ‘‘Winston E. Arnow Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The historic Federal District Court Building located 

5 at 100 North Palafox Street in Pensacola, Florida, shall 

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘Winston E. Arnow Fed7 eral Building’’, in honor of Winston E. Arnow who was 

8 appointed United States District Judge for the Northern 

9 District of Florida by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 
2

•HR 1572 IH 

1 1968, and who served with distinction until his death in 

2 1994. 

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the building 

6 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

7 to the ‘‘Winston E. Arnow Federal Building’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 21.1



                            TALON INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                                  SUBSIDIARIES


                                                          JURISDICTION OF
         NAME                                              ORGANIZATION
         -----------------------------------------        ---------------

         Tag-It Pacific Limited...................        Hong Kong

         Tag-It, Inc..............................        California

         Tag-It Pacific (HK) Ltd..................        British Virgin Islands

         Tagit de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.............        Mexico

         A.G.S. Stationary, Inc...................        California

         Talon Zipper (Shenzhen) Company Ltd.             China

         Talon International Pvt. Ltd. ...........        India

         A.G.S. Holdings, Inc. ...................        Delaware

         A.G.S. Holdings LLC .....................        Delaware

         Tag It Pacific LLC.......................        Delaware

         PT Talon Indonesia. .....................        Indonesia

         Tag It Brands, Inc. .....................        California

         Talon Dominicana S.A. ...................        Dominican Republic
§ 185.134 Witnesses. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, testimony at the hearing shall be given orally by witnesses under oath or affirmation.
( b ) At the discretion of the ALJ, testimony may be admitted in the form of a written statement or deposition. Any such written statement must be provided to all others parties along with the last known address of such witness, in a manner which allows sufficient time for other parties to subpoena such witness for cross-examination at the hearing. Prior written statements of witnesses proposed to testify at the hearing and deposition transcripts shall be exchanged as provided in § 185.123(a).
( c ) The ALJ shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to— ( 1 ) Make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth,
( 2 ) Avoid needless consumption of time, and
( 3 ) Protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.
( d ) The ALJ shall permit the parties to conduct such cross-examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
( e ) At the discretion of the ALJ, a witness may be cross-examined on matters relevant to the proceedings without regard to the scope of his or her direct examination. To the extent permitted by the ALJ, cross-examination on matters outside the scope of direct examination shall be conducted in the manner of direct examination and may proceed by leading questions only if the witness is a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness identified with an adverse party.
( f ) Upon motion of any party, the ALJ shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses. This rule does not authorize exclusion of the following: ( 1 ) A party who is an individual;
( 2 ) In the case of a party that is not an individual, an officer or employee of the party designated by the party's representative; or
( 3 ) An individual whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of its case, including an individual employed by the Government engaged in assisting the representative for the Government.
FY2007
            IMAGIN
      MOLECULAR CORPORATION
            FORM
      10-KSB




EXHIBIT
32.1







Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,





As
Adopted Pursuant to





Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In
connection with the Annual Report of Imagin Molecular Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Joseph G.
Oliverio, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and




(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:
      April 11, 2008
            /s/ Joseph G.
      OliverioJoseph
      G. OliverioChief
      Executive Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Imagin Molecular Corporation and will be retained by Positron Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.