alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### The HONORABLE FERNANDO J. GAITAN, JR., Un ited States District 1 

### Judge for the Western District of Missouri. ___________ No. 96-1116

___________ Victor Kessell, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. United States of America, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: July 25, 1996 Filed: August 12, 1996

___________ Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Vic tor Kessell pleaded guilty to distributing crack cocaine, i n viola tion of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B). The district court 1 sentenced him to 235 months in prison and four years supervised release. We affirmed Kessell's sentence on direct appeal, rejecting his challenge to t he district court's drug-quantity finding. See United States v
. Kessell , No. 94-1140, 1994 WL 399563 (8th Cir. Aug. 3, 1994) (unpublished per curiam). Kessell then brought this 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. The district court denied the mot ion. Kessell appeals, and we affirm. Kessell argues that his three prior burglary convictions constituted one "related" case for purposes of calculating hiscriminal history, because they were not separate d by "intervening" arrests

and he received concurrent sentences on the same day; that he was no t responsible for much of the crack cocaine attributed to him for sentencing ; and that the district court failed to make specific findings on the drug quantityissue, in violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32
. Th ese issues were raised or should have been raised in Kessell' s unsuccessful direct appeal. In any event, they are without merit.

Kessel l also argues that he received ineffective assistance o f counsel during sentencing and on direct appeal because counsel failed to raise and adequately argue the above issues. Ho wever, as these claims are with out merit, Kessel cannot show he was prejudiced by the counsel' s alleged deficiencies. See Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687, 69 0 (1984). Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
---

---

Exhibit 15.2

[Levy Cohen and Co. Letterhead]


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
OF
Hermes Logistics Technologies Limited

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
333-156686) of our report dated February 11, 2009, included in this annual report on Form 20-F of Formula
Systems (1985) Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2008.

|/s/ Levy Cohen and Co.
LEVY COHEN AND CO.
Registered Auditors |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

April 24, 2009



---

---
§ 179.214 Interest, penalties and administrative costs. The office shall assess interest, penalties and administrative costs on debts owed pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3717 and 4 CFR part 101.1 *et seq.* Penalties and administrative costs will be assessed on all delinquent debts. ( a ) In cases of default on a previous repayment agreement, the Office reserves the right to set a new interest rate which reflects the current value of funds to the Treasury at the time a new repayment agreement is executed.
( b ) The Office, on a case-by-case basis, may waive all interest accrued on debts paid in full within 60 days of the due date if there is no indication of fault or lack of good faith on the part of the debtor.
( c ) The Office may waive, in whole or in part, the collection of interest, penalties, and/or administrative costs assessed under this section under the criteria specified in part 103 of 4 CFR, chapter II, relating to the compromise of claims (without regard to the amount of the debt).
( d ) The Office may waive, in whole or in part, the collection of interest, penalties, and/or administrative costs assessed under this section if the Office determines that collection of these charges would be against equity and good conscience or not in the best interests of the United States.
( e ) The Office shall waive the accrual of interest pending consideration of a request for reconsideration, administrative review, or waiver of the underlying debt under provisions of a permissive statute providing for such review related to the debt.
( f ) The Office shall waive interest on repayment agreements when the amount of interest accruing equals or exceeds the amount of installments the debtor can reasonably afford and there is no indication of fault or lack of good faith on the part of the debtor.
### §72b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 72b was editorially reclassified as section 4312 of this title.
### §§241 to 244. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–591, §8(b), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3435

Section 241, acts Feb. 8, 1895, ch. 64, §1, 28 Stat. 645; Mar. 28, 1958, Pub. L. 85–350, §1, 72 Stat. 49, required adoption of rules for navigation of Great Lakes and connecting and tributary waters.

Section 242, acts Feb. 8, 1895, ch. 64, §1, 28 Stat. 645, defined "sailing vessel", "steam vessel" and "under way".

Section 243, acts Feb. 8, 1895, ch. 64, §3, 28 Stat. 649; Feb. 14, 1903, ch. 552, §10, 32 Stat. 829; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §§101–104, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7875, 60 Stat. 1097, related to authority of Commandant of the Coast Guard to establish necessary regulations. See section 2071 of this title.

Section 244, acts Feb. 8, 1895, ch. 64, §2, 28 Stat. 649; Mar. 28, 1958, Pub. L. 85–350, §2, 72 Stat. 49, related to liability of persons and private vessels for violation of provisions. See section 2072 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Mar. 1, 1983, pursuant to 47 F.R. 15135, Apr. 8, 1982, see section 7 of Pub. L. 96–591, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 1604 of this title.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-03-070 November 12, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NEW NRC RESIDENT INSPECTOR ASSIGNED 

TO PEACH BOTTOM NUCLEAR PLANT

Daniel Lee Schroeder has been assigned as the new Nuclear Regulatory Commission

resident inspector at the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station in Delta, Pa. He joins Senior

Resident Inspector Craig Smith at the two-unit site, which is operated by Exelon. He replaces

Michael Buckley who was reassigned to NRC Headquarters in Rockville, Md. 

Mr. Schroeder joined the NRC in July 2002 as an inspector in the Performance

Evaluation Branch in the Region I Division of Reactor Safety in King of Prussia, Pa. Prior to

joining the agency he spent 13 years working for BOC Gases in Kittery, Me., Claymont, Del. and 

Nashville, Tenn., in various engineering and management positions. He also served as a

commissioned officer in the United States Navy. 

Mr. Schroeder is a graduate of the United States Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md.,

where he earned a bachelor’s degree in physics. 

The Peach Bottom resident inspectors can be reached at 717/456-7614.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve

as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work

projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. 

#
### §61h–5. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 61h–5 was editorially reclassified as section 6132 of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 61h–5, Pub. L. 95–26, title I, May 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 80, authorizing the Majority Leader and the Minority Leader to appoint, respectively, an Assistant to the Majority Leader for Floor Operations and an Assistant to the Minority Leader for Floor Operations, was omitted in view of section 101(b) of Pub. L. 98–51, title I, July 14, 1983, 97 Stat. 265, which provided that effective Oct. 1, 1983, the positions of Assistant to the Majority Leader for Floor Operations and Assistant to the Minority Leader for Floor Operations established by the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1977 (Pub. L. 95–26) were abolished.
### §1517. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–380, title II, §2003(a)(2), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 507

Section, Pub. L. 93–627, §18, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2141; Pub. L. 98–419, §4(a), Sept. 25, 1984, 98 Stat. 1608, set penalties for discharge of oil into marine environment and provided for creation and maintenance of a Deepwater Port Liability Fund.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Deepwater Port Liability Fund

Amounts remaining in Deepwater Port Liability Fund established under former subsec. (f) of this section to be deposited in Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund established under section 9509 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code, with that Fund to assume all liability incurred by the Deepwater Port Liability Fund, see section 2003(b) of Pub. L. 101–380, set out as a note under section 9509 of Title 26.

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to incidents occurring after Aug. 18, 1990, see section 1020 of Pub. L. 101–380, set out as an Effective Date note under section 2701 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
narrative legend
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-2000
<CASH>                                           6,118
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,552
<ALLOWANCES>                                       168
<INVENTORY>                                     29,523
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,702
<PP&E>                                          36,804
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,675
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,436
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,519
<SALES>                                         44,270
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,270
<CGS>                                           36,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,116
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   937
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,801)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (395)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,406)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,406)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARCELINO FRED ROD R I GUEZ

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 1 4

- 00 03 2

- CR

Appeal from the

292 nd District Court

of Dallas County, Texas

(TC# F

- 1122577

- V )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’ s third motion for extension of time to file the brief

until June 10 , 201 4

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

THE APPELLANT ’ S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Nanette Hendrickson

, the Appellant ’ s Attorney

,

prepare the Appellant ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before June 10 , 201 4

.

IT IS SO ORDERED t his 14th day of May , 2014

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-04-044 August 6, 2004

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

ZEILER NAMED NRC SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT SUMMER NUCLEAR PLANT

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in the Region II office in Atlanta have assigned

John Zeiler as the Senior Resident Inspector at the Summer nuclear power plant near Jenkinsville, S.C. 

Zeiler had been the Senior Resident Inspector at the Vogtle nuclear plant near Waynesboro, Ga. 

Before being assigned to Vogtle, Zeiler worked as a resident inspector for two years at Carolina

Power & Light’s Robinson nuclear power plant located near Hartsville, S.C., and for five years as a

resident inspector at Duke Energy’s Catawba nuclear power plant near York, S.C. He joined the NRC

in April 1987 as a reactor engineer in the NRC’s region office in Atlanta. 

Zeiler received a B.S. degree in Nuclear Engineering and a Mechanical Engineering degree

from North Carolina State University in Raleigh.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They

serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring

significant work projects and interfacing with plant workers and the public.

Zeiler joins NRC Resident Inspectors Mark King and Mike Cain and Site Secretary Pamela

Bush at the Summer site. The NRC office there can be reached by calling 803-345-5683.

###
#### In the Matter of James B. Stilson, Appellant. T. Darrington Semple et al., Constituting the Town Board of the Town of North Castle, Respondents.

Present — Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-061 April 6, 2005

NRC-NAS REACH AGREEMENT ON SPENT FUEL PUBLIC REPORT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) have

reached agreement on the release of an unclassified public version of a classified NAS report on the

safety and security of spent nuclear fuel storage. The public report was issued by NAS earlier today.

“We are pleased to have been able to work together with NAS to provide this information to

the public. The challenge we have faced has been in striking the appropriate balance between the

public’s right to know and our obligation to protect information that would be useful to terrorists,”

said NRC Chairman Nils J. Diaz.

The NRC believes the NAS study is important, is giving the results and recommendations

serious consideration and has an internal action plan to address the NAS recommendations. The NRC

agrees with many of the points made by the Academy and the study’s findings reflect and support

NRC actions that were already underway or in the planning stages. 

Prior to Sept. 11, 2001, spent fuel was already well protected by physical barriers, armed

guards, intrusion detection systems, area surveillance systems, access controls and access

authorization requirements for employees working inside nuclear power plants. Since then, the NRC

has issued no fewer than nine sets of mandatory instructions or guidance to nuclear plant operators to

improve security of nuclear power plants, including spent fuel in storage. Since early 2002 – well

before Congress requested the NAS study – the NRC has been conducting significant analysis and

reviews which resulted in a number of safety security improvements to provide additional protection

of spent fuel. 

To ensure that NRC maintains the appropriate balance between information security and

openness, NRC has scrutinized the NAS report to ensure that the appropriate information is available

to the public.

The NRC’s responses to NAS recommendations can be found in the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission Report to Congress on the National Academy of Sciences Study on the Safety and

Security of Commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage, as an attachment to the Chairman’s March 14

letter to Senator Domenici. The report is available at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/congress-docs/correspondence/2005/ .

###
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED MARCH 31, 1997 BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS AS FILED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,256,133
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  598,138
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (10,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    322,698
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,328,802
<PP&E>                                       1,642,746
<DEPRECIATION>                               (752,790)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,160,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          552,409
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,774,079
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,484,898)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,160,856
<SALES>                                        890,862
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               890,862
<CGS>                                          623,038
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  623,038
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               589,631
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,728
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (300,131)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,067
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (315,198)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (315,198)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
May 17, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WILLIAM MARSH RICE UNIVERSITY AND GARY SPEARS, Appellants

NO. 14-13-00235-CV V.

RASHEED REFAEY, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the order signed on February 21, 2013, was 

heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error 

in the order. We therefore order the order of the court below REVERSED and 

RENDER judgment that Defendants’ Second Motion for Summary Judgment be 

granted and that appellee Rasheed Refaey take nothing by his claims against 

appellants William Marsh Rice University and Gary Spears. We further order that 

all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee Rasheed Refaey. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          238551
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                238551
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  489591
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              150
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3490
<OTHER-SE>                                      485951
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    489591
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                197456
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   148294
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  49162
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              49162
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     49162
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Not presented, as all shares of common stock are held by a sole
shareholder.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### §2622. Relation to other laws

#### (a) Effect on Federal and State laws

This chapter does not affect the application of any other Federal or State law, statutory or common, including the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 [16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq., 1447 et seq.; 33 U.S.C. 1401 et seq., 2801 et seq.] and the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.).

#### (b) Effect on foreign vessels

This chapter shall be carried out with respect to foreign vessels consistent with the obligations of the United States under international law.

(Pub. L. 100–688, title IV, §4202, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4159.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 92–532, Oct. 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 1052, which is classified generally to chapters 27 (§1401 et seq.) and 41 (§2801 et seq.) of this title and chapters 32 (§1431 et seq.) and 32A (§1447 et seq.) of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1401 of this title and Tables.

The Solid Waste Disposal Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is title II of Pub. L. 89–272, Oct. 20, 1965, 79 Stat. 997, as amended generally by Pub. L. 94–580, §2, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2795, which is classified generally to chapter 82 (§6901 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 6901 of Title 42 and Tables.