Federal Register / Vol. 47, Nc. 129 / Tuesday, July 6, 1982 I Rules and Regulations 29231

properties located in foreign countries, it

is not feasible to approve grant

applications outside of the United States

of America.

The regulation has been reviewed

pursuant to Executive Order 12291 and

will not impact on the public or private

sectors as ~ major rule as defined by the

Executive Qrder. The regulation,

therefore, i~ found to be nonlnajor.

The Adniinistrator hereby certifies

that the regulation will not have a

significant economic impact on a

substantial~number of small entities~ as

they are defined in the Regulatory

Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.601—612.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the

regulation ~s therefore exempt from the

final regu1~tory flexibility analyses

requiremez~ts of sections 603 and 604.

This regulation will only impact upon

veterans with certain disabilities

residing in foreign countries and will not

impact upth small entities located in the

United States, its Territories, or

possession~. There will be no

compliance costs or reporting burdens

on individuals or organizätions~

List of Subjects in 3~ CFR Part 36

Condominiums, Handicapped,

Housing, Lçan programs—housing and

communitydeve)opment, Mobile homes,

Veterans, Veterans Administration.

(Sec. 210(c) (1:), 801(a) and (bJ of title 38,

U.S.C.) (Catrçlog of Federal Domestic

Assistance I~ogram number 64.106).

Approved:l June 17, 1982

Robert P. Nithmo,

Administrator,

PART 36HL0AN GUARANTY

Section J8.44l1 is added as follows:

§ 36.4411 ~eographlcai limits.

Any real~property purchased,

constructed, altered, improved, repaired,

or speciall~ adapted, in whole or in part,

with the prpceeds of any specially

adapted housing grant, shall be situated

in the United States, which, for purposes

of 38 U.S.C~ Chapter 21, is defined as the

several Sta~tes, Territories, and

posse ssion~, including the District of

Columbia, ~he Commonwealth of Puerto

Rico, Guan~, American Samoa, the

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana

Islands, an~d any other area over which

the United1States may, at some future

date, acquire sovereignty.

(38 U.S.C. 210(c), 801(a) and (b)).

FR Ijoc. 62—181~O Piled 7—Z—82~ 8:45 ami

BILLING 000E8320-O1-M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[A—9—FRL 2 142-8)

California State Implementation Plan

Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protectioif

Agency.

ACTlO~4: Notice of final rulemaking.

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) takes final action to

approve revisions to rules of the Bay

Area and South Coast Air Quality

Management Districts (AQMD) and the

Kern and San Diego County Air

Pollution Control Districts {~APCDs)

submitted by the California Air

Resources Board (AEB) for

incorporation into’ the Califorrtht State

Implementation Plan (SW). These

revisions generally are administrative

and retain equivalent emission.control

requirements. EPA reviewed these rules

with respect to the Clean Air Act and

determined that they should be

approved.

DATE: This action is effective September

7, 1982.

ADDRESSES Copies of the revisions are

available for public inspecti’àn during

normal business hours at the EPA

RegionS office and the following

locations:

Public Information Reference Unit,

Environmental Protection Agency,

Ubrary, 401 M Street SW., Room. 2404,

Washington, D.C. Z0460~

- Library, Of~ca of the Federal Register,

1100 L Street NW., Room 8401,.

Washington, D.C. Z0408~

FOR FURTHER INFORMATiON CONTACT~

Douglas Grano, ChieL State

Implementation Plan Section. Air

Management Division, Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 9,215

Fremont Street,, San. Francisco, CA

94105, (415) 974—8058.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The ARB

submitted as SIP revisions the following

rules on the indicated dates:

Bay Area AQMD

July 30, 1981

Regulation 2 Permits—Rule’ 2

2—2-414 Exemption, Non Ozone

Precursor

Regulation 5 Open Burning

5—401.13 Allowable Fires—Wildlife

Management

June 22, 1981

Regulation 5 Open Burning

5—401.3 Allowable Fires—Orchard

Pruning and Attrition

January28, 1981

1—112 Breakdown

1—113 Discretionary Etiforcement,

Breakdown

1—115 Exemptions, Modifications to

Meet Emission Standards

Regulation 9 Inorganic Gaseous

Pollutants—Rule 3

9—3—202 Modified Heat Transfer

Operation

July10, 1980

Regulation 1 General Provisions and

Definitions

1—206 Bar

1—541 Emission Excesses

Regulation 9 Inorganic Gaseous

Pollutants—Rule I

9—1—600 Manual of Procedures

9—1—601 Sampling and Analysis of

Gas Streams

9-1-602 Sulfur Content of Fuels

9—1—603 Averaging Times

9—1—604 Ground Level Monitoring

9—1~-605 Emission Monitoring

Jur~ç 2, 1980

Regulation 1 General Provisions and

Definitions

1—520 Emission Monitoring

1—542 Area Concentration Excesses

1—600 Manual of Procedures

1—601 Approval of Sampling

Facilities

1—602 Area and Source Monitoring

Requirements -

1—603 Visible Emissions

1—604 Opacity Measurements

Regulation B Particulate Matter and

Visible Emissions

6—305 Visible Particles

6-311 General Operations

6-600 Manual of Procedures

6-601 Particulate Matter, Sampling;

Sampling Facilities, Opacity

Instruments and Appraisal of

Visible Emissions

Regulation 11 Hazardous Pollutants—

Rule 1

11—1—500

11—1—501

11—1—600

11—1—601

Limits

11—1—602 Determination of

Background Concentrations

11—1—803 Monitoring Equipment

May13, 1980

Regulation 8 Organic Compounds

Rule 21 Rubber Tire Manufacturing

Operations

January 14, 198(J

Regulation 2 Permits—Rule 1

2—1—100 General

2—1—101 Description

2—1—102 Applicable Requirements

Monitoring and Recording

Monitoring

Manual of Proceddres

Determination of Emissions
29232 Federal Register/Vol. 47, No. 129 I Thesday, July 6, 1982 / Rules and Regulations

2—1—ill Exemption, Sources and

OpeFations

2—1—11~2 Exemption, Equipment

2—1—408 Action on Applications

Rule 62 Sulfur Content of Fuels

Rule 53 Specific Contaminants

October23, 1981 -

Rule 218 Stack Monitoring

Rule 219 Exemptions Not Requiring a

Written Permit Pursuant to

Regulation II

Rule 220 Exemption—Net Increase

in Emissions

Rule 409 Combustion Contaminants

Rule 502 Filing Petitions

November 5,1981

Rule 444 Open Fires

July 14, 1981

- Rule 301 Permit Fees

May28, 1981

Rule 1113 Architectural Coatings

January28, 1981

Rule 1115 Motor Vehicle Assembly

Line Coating Operations.

Under Section 110 of the Clean Air

Act as amended, and 40 CFR Part 51, the

Administrator is required to approve or

disapprove these regulations as SIP

revisions. All rules submitted have been

evaluated and found to be in accordance

with EPA policy and 40 CFR Part 51.

EPA’s detailed evaluation of the

submitted rules is available at the EPA

Library in Washington, D.C., and the

Region 9 office.

It is the purpose of this notice to

approve all the rule revisions listed

above and to incorporate them into the

California SIP. This is being done

without prior proposal because the

revisions are noncontroversial, have

limited impact, and no comments are

anticipated. The public should be

advised that this action will be effective

September 7, 1982. However, if notice is

received by EPA within 30 days that

someone wishes to submit adverse or

critical comments, the approval action

will be withdrawn and a subsequent

notice will be published before the

effective date. The subsequent notice

will indefinitely postpone the effective

date, modify the final action to a

proposed action and establish a

comment period:

Under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the

Administrator has certified that SIP

approvals do not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities. (See 46 FR

8709.)

The Office of Management and Budget

has exempted this rule from the

requirements of Section 3 of Executive

Order 12291.

Under the Clean Air Act, any petitions

for judicial review of this action must be

filed in the United States Court of

Appeals for the appropriate circuit by

September 7. 1982. This action may not

be challenged later in proceedings to

enforce its requirements.

Incorporation by reference of the

State Implementation Plan for the State

of California was approved by the

Director of the Federal Register on July

1, 1981.

(Sacs, 110 end 301(a) of the Clean Air Act, as

amended (42 U.S.C. 7410 and 7601(a)))

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Air pollution control, Ozone, Sulfur

oxides, Nitrogen dioxide, Lead,

Particulate matter, Carbon monoxide,

Hydrocarbons.

Dated: June 14, 1982.

Anne M. Gorsuch,

Administrator.

PART 52—APPROVAL AND

PROMULGATION OF

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

Subpart F of Part 52, Chapter I, Title

40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is

amended as follows:

Subpart F—California

1. Section 52.220 is amended by

adding paragraphs (c)(51)(vii)(C),

(c)(73)(i)(B), (c)(75)(ii), (c)(79)(ii)(B),

(c)(83)(i)(C), (c)(85)(x)(A), (c)(86)(i)(D),

(c)(92)(v)(B) and (vi)(A), (c) (93)(ii)(C),

(c)(95)(i)(C), (c)(98)(ix), (c)(x), and (c)(xi),

(c)(101)(i)(B) and (ii)(B), (c)(102)(iv),

(c)(103)(ii)(B) and (xviii), (c)(104)(ii),

(121), and (125) to read as follows:

§ 52.220 IdentIfication of plan.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(51) * * *

(vii) * *

* (C) New or amended Rule 11.

(73) * * *

(i)* * *

(B) New or amended Regulation 2,

Rule 1: 2—1—100 to 2—1—102, 2—1—111, 2—1—

112. and 2—1—408.

* * * * *

(75) * * *

* (ii) New or amended Rule 424(F).

(79) * * *

(ii) * * *

(B) New or amended Regulation 1: 1—

206, 1—520, 1—542, and 1—600 to 1—604;

Regulation 6: 8—305, 6—311, 6—600, and 6—

601; and Regulation 11: 11-1—500, 11—1—

501, and 11—1—600 to 11—1—603.

* * * * *

(~3)***

(i) * *

(C) New or amended Regulation 8:

Rule 21.

* * * ft *

(85) * *

(x) Kern County APCD.

Kern County

- July 30, 1~981

Rule 198 Stack Monitoring

Rule 2~1 Permits Required

Rule 3~J1 Permit Fee

Rule 362 Permit Fee Schedule

Rule 3~5 Hearing Board Fees

March 23, 1981

Rule 2i)2 Exemptions

Rule 2~2.1 Experimental Research

Ope~ations

Rule4~6 Experimental Research

Ope~ations

Decemb~r 15, 1980

Rule 110 ‘ Arrests and Notices to

App~ar

Rule 417.1 Agricultural Burning

January .~ 1980

Rule 4~4(F) SmallProducers

Exemption

San Diego County

May20, ~l982

Rule 4Q Permit Fees

March 1, 1982

Rule 42 Hearing Board Fees

Rule 6~1 Reduction of Animal Matter

Rule 101 Definitions

Rule 102 Open Fires, Western

Section

Rule 103 Open Fires, Eastern Section

Rule 109 Temporary Suspension of

Perthits -

May 28, ~l98l

Rule 2~t Permit Conditions

January~8, 1981

Rule 20.1 Definitions

May 23, ~l979

Rule 1~ Exemptions

South C~ast AQMD

May 20, ~l982

Rule 4~1.1 Sulfur Content of Gaseous

Fueli

March 1~ 1982

Rule 4fr4 Fuel Burning Equipment,

• NOR~

October~3, 1981

Rule 504.1 Rules for Which

Vari~ances Are Not Allowed
Federal Register I Vol. 47, No. 129 / Tuesday, July 8, 1982 / Rules and Regulations 29233

(A) Ne~ê or Amended Rules 11& and

417.1.

* * *

(j)* *

(D) Neu~ or amended Rule 1—541 and

Regulatiort9, Rules 9—1—600 to 9—1—605.

(921* **

(v) * * ~

(B) New or amended Rule 21.

(vi) South Coast AQMD.

* (A) New or amended Rule 1~l3.

(93)* *~*

(jj)* *

(C) New: or amended Regulation 5,

Rule 5—401~.3. *

(95) * *

(j)* *

(C) New or amended Rules 202, 202.1,

and 426. ~ * *

(ix) Bay ~Area AQMD..

(A) New’ or amended Rules 1—112, 1-~

113, 1—115 and Regulation 9, Rule 9—3--

202.

(x) South Coast AQMD.

(A) New~ or amended Rule 1115.

(xi) San ~l)iego County APCD.

* * 1* * *

(1O1)* ~ *

(j)* * *

(B) New~or amended Regulatiba 2,

Rule 2—2--I~i4; RegulationS, Rule 5—

401.13; anc~ Manual of Procedures—

Volume Itb Volume VI. (jj)* * *

(B) New~or amended Rules 108, 201,

301, 302, ahd 305.

* (102)* ~** *

(iv) Soul~h Coast AQMD.

(A) Ne~ or amended Rule 301.

* * ~* * *

(103)* * *

(ii) * * *

(B) Newor amended Rules 42, 64, 101—

103, and 109.

* (xviii) S~uth Coast AQMD.

(A) New or amended Rules 504.1, 218,

219, 220, 4Q9, and 502.

* * *

(ii) South Coast AQMD.

* (A) New or amended Rule 444.

(121) Revised regulations for the

following APCDs submitted on March 1,

1982 by th~ Governor’s designee.

(i) South Coast AQM]3.

(A) New or amended Rule 474.

(ii) San Diego County APCD,

(A) New or amended Rules 62 and 53.

* * * * * -

(125) Revised Regulations for the

following A-PCDs submitted on May 20,

1982 by the Governor’s designee.

(i) San Diego County APCD.

(A) New or amended Rule 40.

(ii) South Coast AQMD.

(A) New or amended Rule 431.1.

* * * * *

IFR floc. 8Z—16V2 Filed 7.-2—8~ 8:45 an4

BILLING CODE 1560-50-M

40 CFR Part 52

[A~-7—2139.-2]

Missourl Approval and Promulgation

of State implementation Plans; MO 83

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This action approves a state

implementation plan (SIP) revision

submitted by the State of Missouri

which exempts existing Missouri type

charcoal kilns from the process weight

regulation contained in the approved

SIP. EPA proposed to approve, the

revision on April 12, 1982 at 47.FR 15609,

and asked for comments on the

proposed action. One comment letter

was received and the relevant issues

raised in that letter have been

considered in this final rulemaking.

DATE: This rule will become effective

August 5, 1982.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the SIP revision

are available for inspection during

normal business hours at the following

addresses:

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region VII, Air.Branch, 324 East 11th

Street, Kansas City. Missouri 64106

Environmental Protection Agency,

Public Information Reference Unit,, 401

M Street SW.~ Washington, D.C. 20400

Missouri Department of Natural

Resources, 1101 Rear Southwest

Beulevard, Jefferson City, Missouri

65102

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dewayne K Durst, Air Branch,

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region VII, 324 East 11th Street, Kansas

City, Missouri 64106 (816) 374—3791.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION~ On

September 5, 1980, the State of Missouri

submitted a revision to their SIP which

exempts existing Missouri type charcoal

operations from the process weight

provision of state regulations.

On November 4, 1981 (46 FR 54730),

EPA announced the availability of this

submittal and approved it as a revision

to the Missouri SIP. The rationale for the

approval is contained in the

November 4, 1981 Federal Register. In

the approval notice, EPA advised the

public that the effective date of the

approval would be deferred for 60 days.

If notice was received within 30 days.

~after publication that someone wanted

to submit adverse or critical comments,

the approval would be withdrawn and a

new rulemaking action would be

initiated to provide for a public

comment period. Notice was received

within 30 days that someone did want to

submit adverse or critical comments. On

April 12, 1982 (47 FR 15581) EPA

withdrew the final rulemaking and

provided notice that public comments.

were being solicited in a notice of

proposal rulemaking (47 FR 15609).

One comment letter was received on

the proposal to approve the state

submittal. The commenter questioned

EPA’s conclusiort that the ambient air

quality standards are not violated in the

vicinity of Missouri type charcoal ki-Ins

even when the kflns are not controlled.

This question was in response to a

statement in the

November 4, 1981 Federal Register

which indicated visible emissions are

100% opacity during portions of the

charcoal production cycle. The

determination that Missouri type

charcoal kilns do not cause violations of

the National Ambient Air Quality

Standard (NAAQS) for particulates was

based upon ambient sampling studies

conducted by- the State of Missouri at

the property line of charcoal kiins. The

statement in the Federal Register

concerning opacity levels from Missouri

type charcoal kilns was provided as

background information but did not

serve as a basis for approving or

disapproving the SIP revision which

exempted the kilns from the process

weight regulation.

There are several reasons why high

opacity levels from a Missouri type

charcoal kiln do not result in violations

of the NAAQS. The stacks on the kilns

generally do not extend above roof level

and thus are approximately ten feet

above grade. This tends to limit

dispersion. Also, exit velocities are very

low (about 1.5 meters per second). These

two factors cause the amhlent impact of

the stack emissions to be greatest very

close to the kilna. Because the kilns are

located in isolated areas and the kiln

operations are generally located at some

distance from the owners property line,

the impact of the emission on

surrounding property is diminished.

In addition, because the stack gases

are at or near the. saturation point, there

can be interference from water vapor in