alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §903. Establishment of agency Deputy Chief Financial Officers

(a) There shall be within each agency described in section 901(b) an agency Deputy Chief Financial Officer, who shall report directly to the agency Chief Financial Officer on financial management matters. The position of agency Deputy Chief Financial Officer shall be a career reserved position in the Senior Executive Service.

(b) Consistent with qualification standards developed by, and in consultation with, the agency Chief Financial Officer and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, the head of each agency shall appoint as Deputy Chief Financial Officer an individual with demonstrated ability and experience in accounting, budget execution, financial and management analysis, and systems development, and not less than 6 years practical experience in financial management at large governmental entities.

(Added Pub. L. 101–576, title II, §205(a), Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2845.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Senior Executive Service, referred to in subsec. (a), see section 5382 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-112 August 17, 2005

NRC TO HOLD TWO PUBLIC MEETINGS ON

PROPOSED NATIONAL SOURCE TRACKING SYSTEM

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold public meetings Aug. 29 in Rockville, Md., and

Sept. 20 in Houston, Texas, to discuss its proposed national tracking system for certain radioactive

materials used for academic, medical and industrial purposes.

As announced in the Federal Register on July 28, the NRC is considering amending its

regulations to require licensees to report information on the manufacture, transfer, receipt or disposal of

certain radioactive materials and sources of interest to the automated tracking system. The sources are

considered to be “sealed sources” because they are encased in a capsule designed to prevent leakage or

escape of the material. The NRC worked extensively with other agencies and the international

community to reach agreement on which radioactive sources should be tracked. They include, but are

not limited to, certain amounts of Cobalt-60, Strontium-90, Cesium-137, Iridium-192 and Americium241.

Licensees would have to report their initial inventory of these sources and annually verify and

reconcile the information in the system with the licensee’s actual inventory. In addition, the proposed

rule would require manufacturers to assign a unique serial number to each nationally tracked source.

The proposed rule is available on the NRC’s rulemaking website at http://ruleforum.llnl.gov .

 The Aug. 29 meeting will be held in the NRC auditorium, Two White Flint North, 11545

Rockville Pike, Rockville, from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. The Sept. 20 meeting will be at the offices of the

Texas Department of State Health Services, Elias Ramirez State Office Building, 5425 Polk Street,

Rooms 4B-4E, Houston, from 12:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.

The agenda for both meetings calls for a 30-minute welcome, introduction and NRC staff

presentation on the rule requirements, with the remainder of the time available for public comments.

The time available per commenter may be limited to ensure that everyone has an opportunity to speak.

Those planning to attend are requested to notify Ikeda King, telephone 301-415-7278, e-mail

ijk@nrc.gov to pre-register. On-site registration at the meetings will also be available.
Written comments on the proposed rule are also invited and should be submitted by Oct. 11. 

They may be mailed to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-

0001, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff; sent by e-mail to SECY@nrc.gov or submitted

via the NRC’s rulemaking web site at http://ruleforum.llnl.gov .

###
### §1257a. State demonstration programs for cleanup of abandoned mines for use as waste disposal sites; authorization of appropriations

The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency is authorized to make grants to States to undertake a demonstration program for the cleanup of State-owned abandoned mines which can be used as hazardous waste disposal sites. The State shall pay 10 per centum of project costs. At a minimum, the Administrator shall undertake projects under such program in the States of Ohio, Illinois, and West Virginia. There are authorized to be appropriated $10,000,000 per fiscal year for each of the fiscal years ending September 30, 1982, September 30, 1983, and September 30, 1984, to carry out this section. Such projects shall be undertaken in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.

(Pub. L. 96–483, §12, Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2363.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act which comprises this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 1998 and the Consolidated Statements
of Operations, Shareholders' Equity (Deficit), and Cash Flows for the year ended
December 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                        1,476
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 4,608
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    227
<INVENTORY>                                                   8,804
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             15,589
<PP&E>                                                       33,470
<DEPRECIATION>                                               12,648
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               41,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         7,941
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                         11
<OTHER-SE>                                                   30,021
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 41,082
<SALES>                                                      28,709
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             29,011
<CGS>                                                        21,045
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                21,045
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              7,395
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 74
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               72
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (10,855)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 (2,026)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (8,829)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (8,829)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  (.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (.80)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

NATHAN FEE, JERRY MICKENS, 

KELLEY MUNZING, ADRIAN 

MARTINEZ, STEPHANIE PHILLIPS, 

ANDREA HOLNESS, PEGGY 

GRINDSTAFF, JOSEPH RONGA, and 

MARIA GIORDANO, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

C. R. BARD, INC., a New Jersey 

Corporation; BARD PERIPHERAL 

VASCULAR, INC., an Arizona Corporation; 

MCKESSON CORPORATION, a 

Corporation; and DOES 1 through 100 

inclusive, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:20-cv-1484-S

MCKESSON CORPORATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), and because Defendant McKesson 

Corporation (“McKesson Corp.”) is fraudulently joined to this action, as outlined in the Bard 

Defendants’ Notice of Removal (Doc. No. 1, at ¶¶ 23-52), and for the reasons set forth in the 

accompanying Memorandum of Law in Support, McKesson Corp. respectfully moves this Court 

to dismiss without prejudice Plaintiffs’ claims against it for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 

Case 0:20-cv-61670-RKA Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 1 of 2
-2-

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Melissa Dorman Matthews

Melissa Dorman Matthews 

Texas Bar No. 00790603 

mmatthews@hartlinebarger.com

Jordan E. Jarreau

Texas Bar No. 24110049 

jjarreau@hartlinebarger.com

HARTLINE BARGER LLP

8750 N. Central Expy., Suite 1600

Dallas, Texas 75231

Telephone: (214) 369-2100 

Facsimile: (214) 267-4271 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

MCKESSON CORPORATION

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 15th day of June, 2020, a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

document was served upon all known counsel of record via ECF in accordance with the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure.

/s/ Melissa Dorman Matthews 

Melissa Dorman Matthews

Case 0:20-cv-61670-RKA Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Elizabeth C. G. Russell, Deceased. State Tax Commission, Appellant; Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, as Executor of the Will and as Trustee under a Trust Agreement dated January 3, 1928, Respondent.

No opinion. Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ. [178 Misc. 472.]
(April 28, 1949.)

#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, as Trustee, Respondent. Kenneth J. Mullane, as Special Guardian and Attorney for Infants and Others, Appearing Specially, Appellant; James N. Vaughan, as Special Guardian and Attorney for Infants and Others, Respondent.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Van Voorhis, J., dissents on his dissenting opinion in *Matter of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.*(274 App. Div. 772). Ho opinion.
### SUBCHAPTER II—PAYMENTS
#### In the Matter of the Carnegie Trust Company, in Liquidation. New Belgravia Realty Company, Inc., Appellant, v. Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., ■Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §3073. Medical and dental care

The Secretary may provide medical and dental care, including care in private facilities, for personnel of the Administration entitled to that care by law or regulation.

(Pub. L. 107–372, title II, §263, Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3093.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 857–3(b) of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 107–372.
Exhibit
32.1




SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION (CEO) 1350




YUHE
INTERNATIONAL, INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Yuhe International, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gao Zhentao, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
March 31, 2010




/s/
      Gao ZhentaoGao
      ZhentaoChief
      Executive Officer, director
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 210 (Monday, November 1, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 63429]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24279]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>3634]


Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; Amendment <greek-i>3

    In accordance with a notice received from the Department of 
Homeland Security--Federal Emergency Management Agency--effective 
October 19, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to 
include the Municipality of Gurabo as a disaster area due to damages 
caused by Tropical Storm Jeanne. All other municipalities contiguous to 
the above named primary municipality have previously been declared.
    In addition, A[ntilde]asco, Ciales, Dorado, Fajardo, Florida, 
Guayanilla, Isabela, Juana D[iacute]az, Juncos, Lares, Moca, 
Pe[ntilde]uelas, Ponce, Salinas, San Juan, San Lorenzo, San Sebastian, 
Vega Alta, Vega Baja, and Yauco Municipalities in the Commonwealth of 
Puerto Rico are also eligible under Public Assistance and our disaster 
loan program is available for private non-profit organizations that 
provide essential services of a governmental nature in those 
municipalities.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is November 22, 2004, and for 
economic injury the deadline is June 21, 2005.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: October 25, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-24279 Filed 10-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
### §445. Equipment and marking of boats or scows

Every scow or boat engaged in the transportation of dredgings, earth, sand, mud, cellar dirt, garbage, or other offensive material of any description shall have its name or number and owner's name painted in letters and numbers at least fourteen inches long on both sides of the scow or boat; these names and numbers shall be kept distinctly legible at all times, and no scow or boat not so marked shall be used to transport or dump any such material. Each such scow or boat shall be equipped at all times with a life line or rope extending at least the length of and three feet above the deck thereof, such rope to be attached to the coaming thereof, also with a life preserver and a life buoy for each person on board thereof, also with anchor to weigh not less than two hundred and seventy-five pounds, and at least one hundred feet of cable attached thereto; a list of the names of all men employed on any such scow or boat shall be kept by the owner or master thereof and the said list shall be open to the inspection of all parties. Failure to comply with any of the foregoing provisions shall render the owner of such scow or boat liable upon conviction thereof to a penalty of not more than $500: Provided, That the requirements in regard to life line or rope contained in this section shall not apply to any scow or boat the deck outside the coaming or rail of which shall not exceed one foot in width: And provided further, That on any such scow or boat its name or number and owner's name painted in letters and numbers, at least fourteen inches long on both ends of such scow or boat, shall be a compliance with the provisions of this section in regard to name, number, and owner's name.

(June 29, 1888, ch. 496, §3, 25 Stat. 209; Aug. 18, 1894, ch. 299, §3, 28 Stat. 360; May 28, 1908, ch. 212, §8, 35 Stat. 427; Feb. 16, 1909, ch. 132, 35 Stat. 623.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of section 3 of act June 29, 1888. Said section 3 of act June 29, 1888, enacted sections 443 to 448 of this title. See Codification note set out under section 443 of this title.

Provisos are from act Feb. 16, 1909.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-03-069 November 12, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC TO PROVIDE RESULTS OF INSPECTION INTO SEPT. 15TH

AUTOMATIC SHUTDOWN OF PEACH BOTTOM NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

 The results of an inspection conducted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to

examine the causes of the September 15th automatic shutdown of both reactors at the Peach

Bottom nuclear power plant will be provided at a public meeting on Tuesday, November 18. The

plant is located near Delta, Pa., and operated by Exelon.

 The meeting, which will be between NRC staff and Exelon management, is scheduled

to begin at 6 p.m. at the Peach Bottom Inn, 6085 Delta Road, Delta, Pa. It will be open to the

public and there will be at least one opportunity for members of the public to pose questions to

NRC staff members before the session is adjourned.

 An inspection report detailing the team’s findings will be issued within about 30 days

after the meeting.

 On September 24, the NRC announced that it was sending an Augmented Inspection

Team (AIT) to the plant. The six-member team was tasked with looking at both the causes of,

and the plant response to, the automatic reactor shutdowns. An electrical grid disturbance was

identified as the initiating cause of the shutdowns.

 The event began at about 1:30 a.m. on September 15th when, at a location far from the

plant site, breakers on the grid apparently did not function properly to isolate the effects of a

lightning strike. That resulted in a low-voltage condition on both of the off-site power lines that

feed Peach Bottom. Like other nuclear power plants, Peach Bottom not only sends power to the

grid, it also receives energy back for operational purposes. If those power sources are

significantly reduced or interrupted, an affected plant will shut down. That is what automatically

occurred at Peach Bottom immediately after its off-site power sources were impacted.

 As they are designed to do, the plant’s four emergency diesel generators started upon

the interruption of off-site power. Those generators are used to provide power to key safety
systems and assist with the safe shutdown of the reactors. At 2:30 a.m., one of the emergency

generators tripped, or switched off, because of a problem with its diesel engine coolant system. 

The plant continued to have sufficient power to safely shut down the reactors. However,

following the generator trip, Exelon declared an Unusual Event, based on the shift manager’s

discretion, because of what were perceived to be degrading plant conditions. An Unusual Event

is the lowest of four levels of emergency classification used by the NRC.

 Exelon restored the normal configuration of its power supplies at approximately 7:40

a.m. The Unusual Event was declared over at 10:46 a.m.

 #
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements contained in the body of the accompanying Registration
Statement and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000896421
<NAME> STEEL HEDDLE MFG. CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-3-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                OCT-2-1999
<CASH>                                             254
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,543
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (168)
<INVENTORY>                                     18,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,062
<PP&E>                                          46,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (10,669)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 189,195
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,506
<BONDS>                                        125,685
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   189,195
<SALES>                                         53,860
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,860
<CGS>                                           40,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,080
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,593
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,421)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,402)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,019)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,019)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
§ 191.166 Destruction of merchandise. ( a ) *Action by the importer.* A drawback claimant who proposes to destroy rather than export the distilled spirits, wine, or beer shall state that fact on Customs Form 7551.
( b ) *Action by Customs.* Distilled spirits, wine, or beer returned to Customs custody at the place approved by the drawback office where the drawback entry was filed shall be destroyed under the supervision of the Customs officer who shall certify the destruction on Customs Form 7553.