Cover Image:

Wrapped around a human hair, a 50nm silica nanowire conducts red light. 

Photo credit: 

Dr. Eric Mazur 

Harvard University.
K-12 & Informal Nanoscale 

Science and Engineering 

Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Any views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this report are those of the participants, and 

do not necessarily represent the official views, opinions, or policy of the National Science Foundation. or the U.S. 

Government

Workshop Report

October 2005
K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) 

in the United States

Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 3

Day 1 of the Conference

Session I. Instructional Materials: Designing and Developing Classroom Resources ................... 7

Session II. Teacher Professional Development ................................................................................ 8

Session III. Nanoscience Education beyond the Classroom: Exhibits, Media & 

Special Programs ........................................................................................................... 9

Day 2 of the Conference

Session IV. NCLT, NIMD, and NISE projects ................................................................................ 13

Session V. NSEC, NCN, NNIN, and MRSEC projects ................................................................. 14

Appendices

Appendix 1: Cornell University/Center for Nanoscale Systems Profile ............................................. 17

Appendix 2: Cornell University/National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network Profile ............ 23

Appendix 3: Harvard University/Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center Profile ....................... 29

Appendix 4: Johns Hopkins University/Materials Research Science and Engineering 

Center Profile .............................................................................................................. 37

Appendix 5: Northeastern University/Center for High-Rate Nanomanufacturing Profile ................ 41

Appendix 6: Ohio State University/NSEC Profile ............................................................................ 47

Appendix 7: Pennsylvania State University/Center for Molecular Nanofabrication and 

Devices Profile ............................................................................................................. 55

Appendix 8: Princeton University/Center for Complex Materials Profile ........................................ 59

Appendix 9: Purdue University/Network for Computational Nanotechnology Profile .................... 65

Appendix 10: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute/Center for Directed Assembly of 

Nanostructures Profile ................................................................................................. 69
Appendix 11: Stanford University/Center for Probing the Nanoscale Profile ..................................... 75

Appendix 12: University of California Los Angeles/Center for Scalable & Integrated 

Nanomanufacturing Profile ......................................................................................... 81

Appendix 13: University of Illinois/Center for Nanoscale Chemical-Electrical-Mechanical 

Manufacturing Systems Profile .................................................................................... 85

Appendix 14: University of Massachusetts Amherst/Center for Hierarchical 

Manufacturing Profile ................................................................................................. 91

Appendix 15: University of Pennsylvania/NSEC Profiles ................................................................... 95

Appendix 16: University of Wisconsin Madison/NSEC Profile .......................................................... 99
3

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

In October 2005, the National Science Foundation brought members of its nanoscale science and 

engineering education (NSEE) projects to Arlington, VA for a 2-day workshop to explore the status of 

on-going eff orts and to forge collaborations at the national level that would facilitate future eff orts. NSF 

currently funds NSEE projects through the Division of Elementary, Secondary, and Informal Education 

(ESIE), the Directorate for Engineering as part of the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers 

(NSEC), National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN), the Network for Computational 

Nanotechnology (NCN), and the Division of Materials Research as part of the Materials Research Science 

and Engineering Centers (MRSEC). Th is report refers to projects developing instructional materials for 

inclusion in grades 7-12 science courses, providing professional development and research opportunities for 

secondary teachers, and engaging in multiple forms of outreach to schools and general audiences through 

exhibits, media presentations, and traveling programs. NSEE workshop participants included project leaders, 

scientists, instructional materials developers, museum designers, professional development providers and NSF 

program directors. Th e workshop agenda focused on several basic questions: 

What are the core NSEE ideas? 

Who are the audiences for NSEE?

What are appropriate NSEE goals for each audience?

What evidence of impact exists for current NSEE efforts?

Dr. Mihail C. Roco, Senior Advisor at the National Science Foundation, in his opening address, established 

the themes that framed the workshop. Research is rapidly advancing knowledge about nanoscale 

phenomena, in contrast to the scant progress in bringing nanoscale science into school curricula and public 

awareness. Fueled by 2006 government funding of over $1 billion, research on matter at the nanoscale 

will “lead to a revolution in technology and industry” according to Dr. Roco. Emphasizing that a robust 

nanoscale science and engineering infrastructure depends on greater progress in education and public 

outreach, Dr. Roco stressed the importance of early education to prepare American students for future careers 

in nanoscale science, engineering, and technology. He proposed several objectives for NSEE: 

Developing a coherent longitudinal learning sequence extending from K-12 to college and graduate 

programs.

Stronger collaboration between NSE researchers and educators.

Focusing on better preparation of teachers.

Enhancing public outreach efforts.

Partnering across institutions working on NSEE.

Increasing emphasis on engineering and systems. 

Prior to the workshop, participants identifi ed their major areas of interest. Th ese topics were the subjects of 

plenary sessions and provided framing questions for the discussion groups. A plenary presentation by Dr. 

Angelica Stacy, University of California-Berkeley, off ered design principles for eff ective secondary science 

instructional materials. She described her new learning-goals oriented secondary chemistry program in 

which students are introduced to organic functional groups by experiencing characteristic aromas and 

solubilities rather than memorizing structural formulas. She shared research supporting its positive impact 

on student understanding. Dr. Frances Lawrenz, University of Minnesota, delivered a plenary presentation 

on design principles for program evaluation. Citing evaluation plans of three current NSEE projects as 

specifi c examples, Lawrenz described several evaluation strategies, stressing the importance of aligning the 

evaluation plan with program goals. Dr. Robert Chang, Northwestern University, described international 

eff orts in NSEE based on his recent travels in Europe and Asia. 

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
4

Participants from the nano research centers met for in-depth discussions with those from the materials 

development projects during the Day 1 breakout sessions. Th e topics were: Design and Development of 

Instructional Resources; Teacher Professional Development; and Nanoscience Education beyond the 

Classroom. 

During the Day 2 sessions, attendees regrouped for further networking and exchange of ideas. Participants 

from the nano research centers1

 met together to discuss the content and design of their education outreach 

eff orts, while attendees from the projects funded through the Division of Elementary, Secondary, and 

Informal Education2 shared their experiences and concerns related to bringing nanoscale content into 

classrooms and public venues and proposing topics for future research. Both groups discussed strategies for 

increasing collaboration across formal and informal NSEE programs.

As reported in the closing session both groups, although serving diff erent audiences and educational 

purposes, share their commitment to the value of nanoscale education programs for introducing both 

students and the general public to contemporary science. Th e interdisciplinary nature of the topic, its myriad 

applications, and the economic impact of nanotechnology provide an excitement that has great potential for 

engaging learners of all ages and interesting students in career opportunities. Although challenges abound, 

participants reported some success, including workshops for educators, research opportunities for high 

school teachers, teacher-graduate student collaborations to develop classroom materials, traveling exhibits 

for elementary students, computer simulations to aid in visualizing nanoscale phenomena, and recently 

developed instructional packages currently in pilot test mode in secondary classrooms.

However, more discussion time was devoted to challenges than to successes. Th e general public and students, 

in particular, lack fundamental background knowledge upon which to build an understanding of nanoscale 

phenomena. While exhibits focus on public awareness, there is no evidence that they are promoting 

understanding. Instructional materials developers are keenly aware of the diffi culty of introducing any new 

topic in existing science curricula, particularly an interdisciplinary topic that cannot be readily linked to 

state or national standards. Th e informal education community emphasized concern over combating public 

misconceptions and fears resulting from science fi ction accounts of nano critters who take over the world. 

Ultimately, most discussions turned to seeking:

Entry points for an introduction to nanoscale phenomena 

Do units have to start with a discussion of scale and/or new behavior?

Instructional resources that would appeal to secondary teachers 

Will two week units or1-day lessons be more acceptable?

Strategies that emphasize the uniqueness of nanoscale properties 

Must students understand atomic, molecular and supramolecular structure and properties fi rst?

Representations and models to make nanoscale phenomena visible 

Will virtual representations of nanoscale behavior and self assembly be meaningful?

Strategies to share materials and expertise across programs

Will NSF support a national clearing house for nano education resources?

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

1

 Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers (NSEC), National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN), 

Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN), and Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers (MRSEC).

2

 Nanoscale Instructional Materials Development (NIMD), Nanoscience Center for Learning and Teaching (NCLT), 

and Nanoscale Informal Science Education Network (NISE).
K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Assessment strategies to evaluate current efforts

Where will projects find funding and expertise for assessment?

Participants articulated a common set of needs to move current efforts forward more rapidly, including: 

Quality instructional resources that would engage students and support meaningful learning goals.

Content-rich professional development programs for teachers. 

Guidelines for a standards-based K-12 nano learning sequence. 

Innovative technologies to support visualization of nanoscale phenomena.

Strategies for integrating interdisciplinary nano content in discipline-oriented curricula, and better 

connecting researchers and educators.

“Hooks” that capture public interest and combat negative misconceptions.

Clearinghouse to disseminate resources and share best practices across projects

Summaries of all of the workshop sessions follow.

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦



K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Day 1

Session I. Instructional Materials: Designing and Developing Classroom Resources

Framing Questions:

What nano topics and learning goals should guide the development of classroom materials?

What areas of secondary (grades 7-12) science support the integration of nano concepts?

How can instructional technology enrich nano classroom resources?

This session began with four formal presentations. Dr. Joseph Krajcik, University of Michigan, presented 

guidelines for the design of materials; Dr. Patricia Schank, SRI, talked about her group’s early drafts of 

materials for secondary chemistry classes and the obstacles they encountered; Dr. Thomas Moher, University 

of Illinois-Chicago, focused on technology applications for middle school students that would enhance 

understanding of nanoscale phenomena; and Dr. Kenneth Klabunde, Kansas State University, reviewed 

nanoscale science content. 

Krajcik emphasized three lessons learned through his work on a new middle school science curriculum 

that are directly applicable to developing instructional materials in nano science. First, focus on learning 

goals. Developers must help teachers recognize what it means to understand a scientific idea and answer the 

question, “how do we know if students understand?” Second, scaffold complex tasks. Krajcik emphasized 

the importance of helping students develop the skill of presenting evidence-based explanations and providing 

data to support explanations. As a scaffolding example he described a structure for student explanations: 

make a claim, provide evidence, present reasoning, and consider alternatives. His third lesson is that 

instructional materials must be educative for teachers. Krajcik emphasized the importance of providing 

teachers with adequate understanding of content and the appropriate pedagogy for introducing complex 

topics to their students. 

Schank described her Nanosense project that is creating instructional units to use in high school chemistry 

courses. Each unit will emphasize core concepts underlying nanoscale phenomena and employ computer 

visualizations of the behavior of nanoscale particles to enhance student understanding. Schank convened a 

group of teachers, scientists, industry representatives, and education researchers who developed the following 

list of core concepts: scale, energy, quantum principles and probability, relation between structure and 

properties, surface phenomena, unique properties, self-assembly, and control of fabrication.

Shank also stressed the need for authentic tasks and tools to promote student understanding, citing as 

an example a virtual atomic force microscope (AFM). She emphasized the importance of teaching that 

properties depend on scale but cautioned that there are limitations to models and simulations that may be 

informative at one scale but irrelevant at another. 

Schank presented several challenges she and colleagues are confronting: (1) defining a curriculum for nano 

science; (2) situating this inherently interdisciplinary field within traditionally single discipline courses; and 

(3) designing professional development for teachers. She concluded by posing a set of research questions 

related to the teaching of nano content:

Will students’ understanding of nanoscale science concepts (effects of size, significance of high surfaceto-volume ratios, etc.) improve over time?

♦

♦

♦

♦
8

Will students’ understandings of the process of science and the interplay between science and technology 

improve?

Will students’ interest in science increase? 

Will students appreciate how technologies can alter their lives and society? 

How will teachers use these tools and activities to support student discourse and understanding?

Kenneth Klabunde, a Professor of Chemistry at Kansas State University and nano researcher, proposed that 

“nanotechnology is really an extension of chemistry, but it reaches into physics, biology, [and] earth science.” 

As previous presenters, he emphasized the importance of presenting nano in the context of existing classroom 

materials at levels that are developmentally appropriate for diff erent grades. He proposed several nano 

concepts that might become the basis for classroom materials: 

Size-dependence of solid state properties.

Properties that change with nano-sizing.

Uses of nano-scaled applications and devices.

Changes in physical properties at the nano-scale (example–magnesium oxide).

Increase in surface area/volume at the nanoscale.

Chemical properties of nanoscale materials.

How changes in size and shape of nanocrystals aff ect chemical and consolidation properties of 

magnesium oxide.

Preparation and manipulation of gold nanoparticles.

Moher discussed the roles of virtual experiences in student learning and new technologies his group is 

developing for classroom use. He talked about the value of placing a student in the middle of phenomena, 

rather than as an external observer. Describing several successful simulations in which students use 

hand-held devices and interface with laptops, he emphasized that these technologies would off er students 

an aff ordable simulation of the nano world. Talking about the importance of providing students with 

an understanding of scale, Moher off ered examples of simulations that would allow students to “control 

phenomena” at the nano scale. 

Th ese presentations were followed by a more global audience discussion about instructional resources: what 

content to include, how to link nano content to the standards, defi ning “understanding” in the realm of nano 

content. Th e discussion moved toward looking for “hooks’ that might make nano “cool” to young audiences. 

Session II. Teacher Professional Development

Framing Questions:

What nano content should be included in professional development?

What models of professional development can be scaled to meet the needs of a large and diverse teacher 

population?

How can a teacher leadership cadre capable of supporting nano professional development be recruited 

and prepared?

♦

♦

♦

♦

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

♦

♦

♦
9

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Th is began with presentations by Nancy Healy (NNIN, Georgia Institute of Technology), Monica Plisch 

(NSEC, Cornell University), and Christine Morrow (NIMD, McREL and University of Colorado).

Healy described professional development projects sponsored by the NNIN at some of its 13 centers across 

the nation. One example was about teachers visiting nano research labs and, with the help of graduate 

students, designing materials for student use. At subsequent 1-2 day workshops, materials are shared with 

other teachers. A workshop was described to help teachers tie specifi c nano concepts to topics they currently 

teach in secondary science courses. 

Plisch also described specifi c professional development off erings. With examples from the education outreach 

eff orts at her research facility, she talked about an institute for physics teachers and a program combining 

lectures, laboratory tours and hands-on activities, all intended to build teacher content knowledge. She 

described a lending library created to provide materials and activities for classroom use.

Morrow, representing the instructional materials development community, focused on the design principles 

for eff ective professional development and for the preparation of teacher leaders. With specifi c reference to 

her NanoLeap project currently developing a secondary curriculum covering properties of matter, forces, 

energy, measurement and size, ethical issues, and the interdisciplinary nature of nanoscale science, she 

reviewed standards-based teacher professional development guidelines. She emphasized the importance of a 

focus on essential understandings and learning goals for students in both teacher professional development 

and student materials. She described the multi-media teachers guide currently under development that would 

employ video clips illustrating demonstrations and animations, background information rich in content and 

pedagogy, and suggestions for embedded assessments of student learning.

Th ese presentations introduced several critical issues that were, along with the framing questions, topics for 

the subsequent discussion. Th e SRI project adopted the approach of developing short focused lessons for 

key insertion points in the secondary curriculum, since high school teachers are reluctant to include longer 

units in an already over-crowded curriculum. Many were critical of existing high school curricula, describing 

its adherence to single discipline courses as “rigid” and “archaic”. Participants considered the option of 

introducing nanoscale science in middle school classrooms, as they have fewer constraints with respect to 

content and are more welcoming to interdisciplinary topics. 

Th e education outreach eff orts from the research centers mostly involve small numbers of teachers who 

volunteer for these programs. Th ey have opportunities to visit research labs and participate in the design of 

instructional materials that they take back to their students and frequently share with colleagues. At the 

present time, these programs lack formal evaluations, and evidence of impact is largely anecdotal.

Participants suggested additional profession development strategies such as lesson study, classroom support 

for teachers, and peer study groups and emphasized the importance of better instructional materials, 

particularly those that would meet the needs of diverse student groups. 

Session III. Nanoscience Education beyond the Classroom: Exhibits, Media & Special Programs

Framing Questions:

What models of informal nano education have been successful in your projects?

How can formal and informal efforts in nano education be integrated?

What has been learned about making nano accessible to young students? To the general public?

♦

♦

♦
10

The session began with introductory presentations by Anna Waldron, Cornell University, Chang Ryu, 

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and Michael Melloch, Purdue University, describing outreach efforts in their 

projects and some of the obstacles associated with the work. 

Waldron talked about Too Small to See, an exhibit designed for children and adults that is intended to 

engage viewers in thinking about atoms as building blocks. As part of the project evaluation audiences of 

different ages were interviewed about what they understood. Few were able to comprehend scale. High 

school students associated “small” with a spec of dust or a grain of sand. Some of the adults interviewed 

heard of “nano” and “nanotechnology”, but, as Waldron noted, awareness is different than understanding. 

It’s a Nano World is a traveling exhibit for children age 5-8. Like Too Small to See, the exhibit tries to push 

viewers’ understanding from small to smaller, but, according to Waldron does not succeed in conveying 

understanding of the nano level. 

Some of the challenges Waldron encountered in her work include engaging the public in the topic and 

providing interactive learning experiences that might enhance understanding. 

Ryu described the Molecularium, a portable dome for presenting a musical simulation in which cartoon-like 

figures with facial features model atomic motions and molecular interactions to help K-5 students understand 

molecular behavior. The animation conveys the message that everything is made of atoms. A first installment 

features figures representing hydrogen, oxygen, and water. The next episode will focus on carbon and atoms 

in living things. There were several concerns about the implications of this approach, in particular the impact 

of anthropomorphizing atoms on a child’s understanding of science. Ryu explained that this 7-minute show 

engages both children and adults. 

Melloch described a LEGO simulation of a scanning probe microscope and an exhibit about The Science of 

Making Things Smaller. 

A key challenge confronting the informal education community is finding ways to reach audiences 

with minimal knowledge of nano science or background on which to build meaningful understanding. 

Participants agreed that their work is complicated by the absence of a clear set of essential understandings 

and desired outcomes. The need for effective materials was stressed repeatedly—materials that are based on 

best practices and have been subject to rigorous evaluation. 

Chemistry was mentioned as a possible introduction to nanoscale science. However, critics noted that since 

public understanding of chemistry is generally limited it is not an adequate entry point and properties of 

chemical systems are quite different from those of nano systems 

Ultimately, effective resources for informal education must evoke a “wow” to attract audiences. There was 

general agreement on the goal of raising public awareness. Under this general heading, came issues such as 

using nano as a vehicle for showcasing the interdisciplinary nature of science and introducing the tools that 

are advancing the frontiers of science. Participants acknowledged the importance of developing age-specific 

learning goals and conducting systematic evaluations of informal education programs, reporting both what 

works and what doesn’t.

The discussion moved to nano education in museum settings. Larry Bell, director of Boston’s Museum of 

Science, emphasized that museums have fewer constraints than classrooms. Although most discussions of 

NSEE content started with teaching size and scale, Bell proposed a different starting point. At the nanoscale, 

the properties of matter are different than at the micro or atomic scale. Atoms can be manipulated and new 

molecules assembled atom by atom. Bell suggested that this is the “wow” that will attract the audience. 
11

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Teachers and parents bring children to museums to supplement what they learn in school. They want 

exhibits that are “cool” but can be related to the curriculum. Although emphasizing size and scale came up 

repeatedly, Bell proposed not focusing on size, but rather on the fact that the critical properties are different 

and things are manufactured in a different way---bottom up assembly, atom by atom. 
12
1

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Day 2

Session IV: NCLT, NIMD, and NISE projects

Framing questions:

Finding a place for nano in the secondary curriculum: what have we learned?

Preparing teachers for pilot and field-testing: what are we doing? What might we do better?

What research projects are currently underway? What research questions are emerging?

Collaboration among formal and informal efforts: how can they support one another?

The session began with each project summarizing current efforts. McREL’s NanoLeap project in 

collaboration with Stanford University researchers is developing a multimedia guide for secondary physical 

science and chemistry teachers. It will incorporate text, activities, and simulations and provide web-based 

teacher support. The project is currently engaged in professional development of leader teachers who will 

participate in development and pilot testing. 

SRI’s NanoSense project shared the first volume of their curriculum series entitled Size Matters: Introduction 

to Nanoscience. It includes both teacher and student materials, reference readings, PowerPoint presentations, 

worksheets, and assessments. Noting that teachers must believe they have sufficient understanding to field 

students’ questions before presenting a new topic, the developers start the volume with a segment For Anyone 

Planning to Teach Nanoscience... Read This First! It alerts teachers to challenges and opportunities associated 

with teaching nanoscience, and it encourages teachers to examine with students how to approach phenomena 

we don’t yet understand. Early evaluation results indicate that transfer from a professional development 

session to an effective classroom lesson is challenging, even for master teachers.

The NCLT, housed at Northwestern University, offers a monthly web cast to share ideas among nano 

researchers and educators. The Center is forming interdisciplinary research teams that will study the extent 

to which new tools and technologies promote students’ understanding of nanoscale phenomena. 

NISE is a newly-funded network of major science museums in Boston, Minneapolis, and San Francisco. 

Ultimately 100 additional museums across the country will join the network. It will promote all forms of 

public engagement related to NSEE including exhibits, media programs, public forums, and professional 

development. 

The conversation about the role of nano content in school science quickly turned to a discussion of obstacles: 

Guidelines for a coherent progression of nano concepts must be developed.

Learning goals for students of different ages have not been articulated.

The science standards do not encompass topics such as nanoscience.

Tools and technologies to help students visualize and understand phenomena at the nanoscale are not 

available.

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
1

The classroom materials described in the workshop all begin with the concept of size and scale, but there is 

little research available on students’ comprehension of this topic. Some questioned this starting point. There 

was overwhelming support for establishing a research based learning sequence to guide future materials 

development and education outreach efforts. 

Teacher professional development is a challenge for all of the instructional materials projects. A small number 

of teachers have participated in existing programs. Few teachers have adequate content knowledge for 

learning or teaching nano, or for the roles they would normally play in materials development: consulting 

as experts in pedagogy and the needs of students from diverse backgrounds; conducting pilot and field tests; 

and leading professional development for peers as resources become available for dissemination. Participants 

suggested strategies that have been successful in other content areas: lesson study, engaging teams of 

teachers, rather than individuals, securing administrative support, internships with researchers, professional 

development in cross disciplinary teams, and mentoring. 

Participants identified several system-related issues that inhibit change in school science:

While research supports the need for 2-3 week focused instructional units to achieve content 

understanding, teachers are asking for 1-day lessons to insert in existing curricula. 

Neither teachers nor curricula are prepared to incorporate interdisciplinary topics.

Middle school courses have greater content flexibility and fewer time constraints, but students and their 

teachers have limited prior knowledge on which to base instructional units.

Secondary science curricula, already overburdened with content, do not welcome additional topics, 

particularly those not clearly linked to standards and high stakes assessments.

Pre-service programs are not preparing teachers for interdisciplinary content.

Members of the informal community emphasized that museum-based and other informal programs, 

not constrained to align with specific disciplines or audience ages, have greater flexibility than classroom 

programs. Museums can introduce nanoscale topics in the context of engineering or technology, fields 

that accommodate interdisciplinary approaches. Participants supported stronger links between formal 

and informal programs, specifically in sharing instructional resources, linking schools to museums that 

would provide access to costly visualization tools and technologies, and collaborating in teacher professional 

development that addresses both content and engagement. 

Session V. NSEC, NCN, NNIN, and MRSEC projects

Framing Questions:

What design principles guide the development of education outreach materials?

Professional Development programs: What works? With whom? How do we measure success?

Student programs: What works? With whom? How do we measure success?

Fostering collaboration among the nanoscience and education communities: how can they support one 

another?

The discussion began with questions about what students know about nano. Although few studies 

are available, there was consensus that students acquire impressions from television, but much of their 

background is misinformation.

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
15

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Workforce development is a major concern of the education outreach programs, along with meeting 

the needs of adult audiences. When students at NSEC-sponsored summer camp were asked what they 

knew about nano, most responded, “Nothing.” Following a 3-day program, students report interest and 

excitement. Th e hope is that they will pursue science-oriented careers. While there was some discussion 

of the value of nanotechnology to teach basic science concepts, most were concerned about guidelines for 

building public understanding of specifi c topics in nanoscience and engineering. Participants wanted to know 

more about successes at other Centers and questioned whether the NCLT and NISE had the capacity to serve 

as a clearinghouse for these eff orts. 

Th e discussion of professional development focused not on teachers, but on the needs of legislators, the 

business community, lawyers, journalists, and other non-technical audiences. As in previous sessions, 

participants emphasized the need to respond to fear and misinformation generated by science fi ction novels, 

such as Crichton’s Prey. Interestingly, one participant talked about using the novel to generate interest and 

pose questions that would be answered with accurate information.

Some Centers off er workshops in nanotechnology for media people. Industries are contacting the Centers for 

more education programs. Some Universities are engaging nanoscience and engineering graduate students to 

lead tours and outreach sessions for business people and for students from other university departments. A big 

challenge is communicating key ideas in jargon-free, non-technical language.

Th e discussion of student programs brought forth concerns about reaching diverse, currently underserved 

audiences and providing them with information about career opportunities. Some suggested collaborating 

with community organizations that have programs reaching underserved youth. Specifi c examples of youth 

programs were described: Howard University has a charter middle school that focuses on science; University 

of California-Santa Barbara provides Chip Camps for local Spanish-speaking students; and Princeton 

University’s Materials Academy hosts students from the Trenton Public Schools. Th ere were also descriptions 

of programs targeting young women with featured presentations by female researchers and doctors. Project 

leaders were urged to invest in professional evaluations to study the impact of these programs and guide 

future eff orts.

Th ere was optimism about increased collaboration across the nanoscience and education communities now 

that the NNIN (National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network) and the NISE (Nanoscale Informal 

Science Education) Network are in place and intend to share resources with each other and with regional 

partners. Th e museums bring expertise in how to make eff ective presentations to the public. Th e research 

centers provide essential content expertise. It was suggested that the NCLT serve as a clearinghouse for 

resources for formal education and that all NSEE resources be centrally housed and disseminated on-line. 

Conclusions and Next Steps

A cross-section of NSEE professionals representing the NSECs, MRSECs, and formal and informal 

projects funded through ESIE attended the workshop and provided their perspectives on current needs and 

challenges. Th ere was general agreement that nano scale phenomena off ered many “hooks” to engage learners 

of all ages in science and that ultimate success would depend on fi nding a balance between generating 

engagement and promoting understanding. 

Workshop participants supported the following conclusions: 

Establish a clearinghouse for sharing information and resources.

Take advantage of informal venues to promote awareness and broaden participation. 

♦

♦
16

Foster partnerships to share expertise across scientific and education communities, both formal and 

informal.

Develop a research-based sequence of learning goals to guide resource development.

Expand professional development efforts for teachers and other professionals. 

Plan future meetings for exchange of ideas across the NSEE community.

Networking across the projects began at the start of the workshop. By the fi nal session, resources, 

particularly teacher materials and presentation outlines, had been shared, and several participants agreed 

to make presentations for other projects. In January 2006, the Division of Elementary, Secondary, 

and Informal Education (ESIE) funded a conference for experts in nano science, learning sciences, and 

instructional materials development to collaborate with teachers in the development of a learning trajectory 

to guide NSEE eff orts. It will be disseminated to the science and education research communities through 

a series of research articles and to teachers through a monograph published by the National Science 

Foundation.

♦

♦

♦

♦
1

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Appendix 1: Cornell University/Center for Nanoscale Systems P

I. Description

Institution: Cornell University

PI: Robert Buhrman

Co-PIs: none

Title: Center for Nanoscale Systems in Information Technologies

Proposal: 0117770

Program Officer: Bruce Kramer

Education Outreach Director: Dr. Monica Plisch, mjp11@cornell.edu

II. Research Agenda

Research Focus: Information technologies

The Center for Nanoscale Systems (CNS) has assembled interdisciplinary teams to execute an aggressive 

and wide-ranging nanoscale science and engineering research program. The CNS research mission is to 

substantially increase the impact of nanotechnology by advancing the understanding and control of the 

electronic, photonic and magnetic properties of materials at the nanoscale, and by exploiting these material 

systems and associated nanoscale phenomena in the development and demonstration of high-performance 

devices and systems. The Center’s primary research objective is the innovation and development of effective 

nanoscale systems that have the potential of being revolutionary solutions for the ever-more demanding 

requirements of future computational, sensing, information storage and communication systems. CNS also 

seeks to invent and develop effective NSE research tools and techniques to support and further advance these 

information technology efforts.

In parallel with pursuing its research agenda, CNS seeks to attract, educate, and mentor substantial numbers 

of a diverse population of students, at all levels, in both introductory and advanced topics in nanoscale 

science and engineering, including ethical and societal issues, and career development. CNS also operates a 

very significant education outreach program for high school physical science teachers.

III. Education Activities within the University

1. Research Experience for Undergraduates 

Description of activities

Undergraduate students spend 10 weeks at Cornell doing research under the supervision of CNS faculty. In 

addition, a series of short courses and faculty lectures are designed to give students a broader understanding 

of NSE and introduce skills relevant to research.

Program staff and expertise

P.I.: Prof. George Malliaras, Materials Science and Engineering
1

Goals and objectives

Our goal is to provide 12 undergraduates with the opportunity to:

Experience independent research at a leading center for NSE research

Develop practical skills for research activities

Gain in-depth perspective on opportunities in NSE

Become part of the NSE community

Target audience (educational levels, number of students at each level, etc.)

This program funds up to 12 undergraduate students each summer. We give priority to qualified students 

from underrepresented minorities, women and students from primarily undergraduate institutions.

Current activities

See goals and objectives above

Nano S&E content focus

NSE research in a broad array of fields related to information technologies

2. Nanotechnology Curriculum

Description of activities

AEP 102 Introduction to Nanoscience and Nanoengineering is a lecture and lab course designed as a hands-on, 

engaging introduction to NSE.

AEP 661 Nanocharacterization is a serious introduction to the tools used to image and probe materials at the 

nanoscale.

Program staff and expertise

AEP 102

Lecturer: Prof. Robert Buhrman, Applied & Engineering Physics

Lab Instructor: Monica Plisch, Ph.D. Physics

AEP 661

Lecturer: Prof. David Muller, Applied & Engineering Physics

Goals and objectives

AEP 102 - To increase students awareness and interest in NSE.

AEP 661 - To provide instruction in nanocharacterization techniques for grad students and advanced 

undergraduates.

Target audience (educational levels, number of students at each level, etc.)

AEP 102 is a course designed for freshmen engineering students and has room for up to 80 students per year. 

It has been nearly full for the past two years offered.

AEP 661 is a course designed for senior undergraduate and beginning graduate students. 

Current activities

To date, 10 lab modules have been developed for introducing college freshmen to NSE. In addition, more 

than 200 students have taken the course to date and have increased awareness of NSE concepts, and many 

report a strong interest in pursuing further studies in this field. 

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
1

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Nano S&E content focus

See description of activities above

3. CAPES mentoring progra

Description of activities

The Career Advancement Program for Engineers and Scientists (CAPES) is an innovative mentoring program 

with the goal of better motivating and preparing graduate students and postdoctoral scholars to excel in their 

chosen career by improving their competitiveness when they enter the workforce.

Program staff and expertise

Chair: Prof. Melissa Hines, Chemistry and Chemical Biology

Goals and objectives

To help students develop important real-world skills such as public speaking, proposal writing and scientific 

“salesmanship.” 

To give students a realistic and unbiased view of academic and non-academic career opportunities.

To help prepare female and minority students for high level careers in engineering and science.

Target audience (educational levels, number of students at each level, etc.)

The target audience is graduate students and postdoctoral scholars. Typically, more than 100 students attend 

each of the 4 seminars offered each semester.

Current activities

Slides and video from each seminar are available at www.cns.cornell.edu as an on-line resource. Also, see 

goals and objectives above.

Nano S&E content focus

See description of activities above.

IV. Education Activities Outside the University 

1. CNS Institute for Physics Teachers

Description of activities

See current activities below.

Program staff and expertise

Director: Monica Plisch, Ph.D. Physics

Coordinator: Linda Clougherty, B.S. Accounting

Goals and objectives

To update high school teachers on recent advances in physics including NSE.

To provide teachers with take-home laboratory exercises designed to meet the time and budgetary constraints 

of a typical high school, as well as fitting state-mandated curriculum.

To develop a continuing relationship between CNS and participating high school teachers.
20

Target audience (grade levels, number of students at each level, school districts, etc.)

Our target audience has been high school physics teachers, primarily in New York State. Satellites allow us 

to reach teachers in other locations, including minority-serving school districts in Los Angeles and Cleveland. 

To date, more than 500 teachers have come to at least one CNS workshop.

Current activities

More than 10 teacher workshops are held each year across New York State and at satellite locations including 

Los Angeles and Cleveland.

A three-week summer institute at Cornell University with a lecture and lab format provides teachers with 

intensive training.

To date approximately 20 new lab activities have been developed for teaching high school physics.

An equipment lending library provides kits for teachers to implement CNS activities.

Nano S&E content focus

Lectures at teacher workshops frequently have a NSE theme related to information technologies, which is the 

expertise of the faculty in our center. Hands-on activities focus on helping teachers meet learning standards, 

which sometimes can be related to NSE content.

Nano S & E content consultants

CNS researchers work closely with teachers to develop new materials.

V. Education Outreach Materials

Describe and provide examples of materials, outlines, demonstrations, etc. developed for outreach activities 

for the K-12 and/or informal audiences

Each year, we bring together teachers and researchers to develop new hands-on activities with the goal of 

updating physics classrooms and engaging students with stimulating learning experiences. Teacher training 

workshops are used to disseminate new activities. Activities are described on our website www.cns.cornell.

edu. 

Describe a recent successful education outreach activity See above.

VI. Education Outreach Evaluation

Summarize outreach evaluation plan

All workshops, courses and classroom materials are evaluated by participants, including classroom teachers 

and/or students. Written and oral evaluations are used to solicit quantitative and qualitative information. 

This feedback is used to improve programming and materials. In addition, a three-page annual survey is sent 

to alumni of the summer institute to determine classroom impact.

Summarize outreach evaluation results

Teacher feedback from summer institute 2004

Highly enthusiastic response; typical teacher comments included:

“CIPT has provided a source of new and interesting labs.”

“I feel re-energized about physics.” 

Liked best: “To see the current research.”

All teachers planned to use most labs at end of courses

♦

♦
21

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Many teachers want more

9 teachers returned in 2004

17 teachers returned in 2005

Follow-up survey (end of school year)

67% return rate for June 2005 annual survey

Overall effect of participation? (1 = no effect, 5 = enormous effect)

2003 participants: 3.9

2004 participants: 4.6

Average lab implementation rate: 40%

VII. Lessons Learned

List 2-3 lessons learned to share with others embarking on a nano education outreach effort

Activities that meet learning standards are much more likely to be used by teachers than those that do 

not address the curriculum in any way.

It is essential to bring together researchers and teachers when developing new classroom materials and 

activities.

Teacher training is important for teachers to adopt new curricular materials.

Describe what you might do differently in the future

In the future, we plan to focus on the middle school curriculum to reach a wider population, especially 

underserved minority students and teachers. High school physics is infrequently taught in under-resourced 

schools.

♦

♦

♦

1.

2.

3.
22
2

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Appendix 2  Cornell University/National Nanotechno

Infrastructure Network P

I. Description 

Institution: Cornell University (with 12 other sites)

PI: Sandip Tiwari

Co-PIs: none

Title: National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network

Proposal: 0335765

Program Officer: Larry Goldberg

Education Outreach Director (name and email address): Nancy Healy, nancy.healy@mirc.gatech.edu

II. Research Agenda

Research Focus: NNIN is not a research organization and is not directly funded for research

The National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN) is an NSF-funded partnership of 13 

university user facilities openly available for research and development in nanoscience. We provide the 

tools and training to support the nanotechnology research needs of researchers in academic, industry, and 

government. 

III. Education Activities within the University

 NNIN has as its goals a wide variety of educational outreach that spans the spectrum of K-gray, i.e. school 

aged children through adult professionals. Education and outreach components of the NNIN include 

network-wide programs to address needs at the national scale and more specific efforts for communities that 

are local to network sites. This report will highlight activities occurring across the network and will serve as 

examples but will not encompass all activities occurring.

Our activities focus on the following general areas:

Activities to encourage K-12 students to enter STEM

Resources to inform the public

Activities and/or information to undergraduates on careers in nanoscience

Tools and resources for undergraduates and graduate students (teaching and learning focus and research 

focus)

Outreach programs for under-represented groups

Technical workforce development

Activities and/or resources for K-12 teachers and guidance counselors

The 13 NNIN sites each have responsibility for specific components of our education agenda. Certain sites 

are also lead institutions for an outreach activity and will work in collaboration with other sites. For example, 

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
2

the University of New Mexico is the lead site for addressing under-represented groups but this work is in 

collaboration with Georgia Tech, UC Santa Barbara, and Howard University. However, all sites will utilize 

materials and resources that this group develops. 

The NNIN education and outreach programs are typically designed to begin as local programs at each host 

institution and then expand to the other sites and eventually be posted on the NNIN web site for national 

dissemination. Because the NNIN is a national network of 13 universities, it is difficult to divide out 

activities between inside and outside the university. This report will describe activities occurring across our 

network and thus combines sections III and IV. 

Description of activities

NNIN education portal http://www.nnin.org/nnin_edu.html

NNIN social and ethical issues portal http://sei.nnin.org

Summer camps for high school students

K-12 outreach programs (on-campus tours, activities, and on-site school programs, including a traveling 

NanoVan)

Research experiences for high school students

High school brochure on entering STEM and nano fields

PSAa for middle and high school audiences at Howard University

Science magazine for children http://nanooze.org

REU program (81 participants in 2005 at 12 sites) with end-of-program convocation which is a “mini” 

scientific conference that is webcast (http://www.nnin.org/nnin_reu.html)

RET program at Stanford, Georgia Tech, and Univ. of Washington (local programs which vary in design 

at each site)

Teacher workshops at Penn State Univ.

Exhibitors booth at NSTA

Instructional materials development (UC Santa Barbara and Penn State have completed materials and 

Georgia Tech is beginning development); Stanford has an IMD award from NSF with McRel to develop 

high school materials under a project tilted “A Nano Leap into New Science”

Guidance counselor brochure under development at Univ. of Washington 

Workforce development

Penn State and U. of Minnesota have two year college partnership programs in nanotechnology

UCSB offers six-month internship program for community colleges

Univ. of Texas nine-month internship in microelectronics and nanotechnology for community 

college students

Univ. of Washington’s Ph.D. nanotechnology option (expansion under NNIN through support and 

training at facility)

Workshops held at sites on a variety of topics such as characterization, fabrication, research, and 

product development (http://www.nnin.org for upcoming and past events)

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

◊

◊

◊

◊

◊
25

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Course development

Web-cast MEMs course from the Univ. of Michigan

Nano-ethics course at Univ. of New Mexico

On-line open textbook on nanotechnology (Univ. of Minnesota lead organizer) currently under 

development

Nanotechnology graduate student organizations at Univ. of Washington and Georgia Tech.

Two special symposia: 

MRS Spring 2006 three day session on NanoEducation

AAAS February 2006 session on formal and informal education (NNIN with NISE-NET)

Outreach materials at professional organizations conferences of under-represented groups

University of New Mexico developing recruitment brochure

Program staff and expertise

Each site’s program staff varies in terms of expertise. The NNIN Education Office is housed at Georgia 

Institute of Technology which coordinates the NNIN education efforts across all 13 sites and with other 

national programs. Some sites have full-time education coordinators while others have a part-time person 

(time commitment varies for part-time personnel). The NNIN education coordinators meet twice each year 

at various sites and an additional two times by teleconference. 

Goals and objectives

The NNIN has established the following goals for its network-based educational outreach and training: 

Expose young people to advanced and exciting research in nanotechnology and motivate them to educate 

themselves for careers in the sciences or engineering;

Train teachers and guidance counselors about the discipline of experimental sciences, provide additional 

teaching tools, and enhance their enthusiasm for having students pursue careers in science;

Create and distribute educational materials for children, college students, technical professionals, teachers 

and the general population, as well as improve the understanding of and involvement with science, 

technology, engineering and mathematics;

Focus these efforts on population segments having disproportionately low employment and education in 

sciences, including women, disadvantaged minorities, and the economically disadvantaged.

Target audience (educational levels, number of students at each level, etc.)

The target audience for NNIN activities is K-gray which includes elementary school students through adults 

(graduate students, faculty, adult professionals, and the general public)

Current activities

NNIN has developed and anticipates continuing development of instructional materials for K-12 schools 

and teachers. In addition there will be course development for undergraduate and graduate students and 

adult professionals. We are also developing materials (print and media) to encourage high school students 

to consider careers in STEM and in particular nano. These efforts also have a focus on reaching underrepresented populations. Our web site will also contain information on activities that can be done during 

school visits to nanotechnology research sites as well as demonstrations suitable for visits to schools. 

♦

◊

◊

◊

♦

♦

◊

◊

♦

◊

♦

♦

♦

♦
2

Nano S&E content focus The NNIN also focuses on social and ethical issues of nanotechnology. The 

SEI portal has numerous resources available http://sei.nnin.org. Each site has an SEI coordinator with lead 

SEI sites being Cornell, Univ. of Washington, Univ. of New Mexico, Stanford, and Georgia Tech. The SEI 

programs are coordinated by the Cornell University site. Below is a summary of current SEI activities:

SEI portal developed at NNIN web site

REU participant developed training video in SEI; all REU students participated in REU activities at 

their sites and at the convocation

An analysis of public awareness and perceptions of nanotechnology, particularly as it relates to public 

health

Georgia Tech is examining how nanotechnology enters commercial markets

Development of a nano-ethics course at Univ. of New Mexico

Survey of nano-researchers on ethical issues

Univ. of Washington is examining how nano-researchers communicate their work and what ethical issues 

they face.

Cornell Univ. is examining the laboratory life as it pertains to research and development of 

nanotechnology

Co-sponsoring of workshops and symposia

AAAS February 2006 session on SEI issues

V. Education Outreach Materials

Describe and provide examples of materials, outlines, demonstrations, etc. developed for outreach 

activities for the K-12 and/or informal audiences

Examples of some of NNIN efforts:

The NNIN education portal has information on several topics suitable for K-12 students including our 

science magazine Nanooze. Additional materials for the web site are under development

We have instructional materials developed and under development that will soon be posted on the web 

site. For example, Penn State has developed a NanoProducts lesson that can be used with visiting school 

groups, by teachers, and community organizations. They are also beta testing high school chemistry 

units that have a nanotechnology theme. Additional units are being developed in physics and biology. 

Lessons developed by RET teachers are under revision and will be posted on the site once edited.

Georgia Tech has developed a tour/demonstration program for school groups and is modifying it so that 

other sites can use the model. This will be posted on the web site.

The on-line Open Textbook in Nanotechnology will be available to anyone through our web site. It is 

due for completion within the next year.

Promotional materials targeting high school students and undergraduates are under development and 

will be distributed to schools, at conferences, and be posted on the web site.

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

◊

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
2

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Describe a recent successful education outreach activity

The NNIN 2005 REU program hosted 81 students at 12 sites. These students performed hands-on research 

in nanotechnology using our state-of-the-art facilities. Our program received 500 applications from across the 

nation. Survey results of our participants indicate that 31% applied only to our program and another 15% to 

only one other REU program. Because of the diversity of our sites (in terms of research focus and equipment) 

we offer students a wide variety of research projects that allow them to see the breadth of nanotechnology 

and to gain an understanding of the interdisciplinary nature of nanotechnology. The NNIN REU program 

culminates with a convocation where students present their results in both oral and poster format. Students 

learn about research conducted by their peers at other sites and have a time to network with their peers. Our 

survey results indicate a high level of satisfaction with the program and that the convocation is an important 

professional experience for the participants. Student presentations can be viewed at http://www.nnin.

org/nnin_reu.html.

VI. Education Outreach Evaluation

Summarize outreach evaluation plan

Individual activities have their own survey instruments to determine success of a program. For example, 

Georgia Tech’s NanoCamp surveys their participants at the end of the camp to determine satisfaction/nonsatisfaction with the numerous activities during the week long program. Other sites do similar survey. In 

addition, through our communication network, sites share survey instruments which than can be adapted for 

each sites programs. 

The NNIN is also developing a data management system for collecting evaluation data on our numerous 

programs. Our system will collect information on the outreach activities occurring at all levels and will 

include typical information on type of activity, number of participants, demographics of participants, and 

survey results.

VII. Lessons Learned

List 2-3 lessons learned to share with others embarking on a nano education outreach effort

If you are a multi-site program, it is imperative that you get to know your counterparts at the different sites. 

It will make communication go a lot easier.

If you are a multi-site program, it is imperative that you establish a communication system for regular 

communication among and between sites.

Teachers are interested in nano but don’t know where it fits into the curriculum. They are also interested in 

all level of nano instructional materials from short little introductions/”fillers” to full scale lesson tied to the 

standards.
2
2

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Appendix 3: Harvard University/Nano

Science and Engineering Center P

I. Description

Institution: Harvard University

PI: Robert M. Westervelt

Co-PIs: Bertrand I. Halperin

Title: Nanoscale Systems and their Device Applications

Proposal: 0117795

Program Officers: Denise Caldwell, Ulrich Strom

Education Outreach Director: Kathryn Hollar, ofhollar@deas.harvard.edu

II. Research Agenda

Research Focus: The Center has overlapping interdisciplinary research areas in

Cluster I: Tools for Integrated Nanobiology

Aims to build bridges between the physical and biological sciences. The physical sciences offer powerful new 

tools for manipulating and testing biological cells and tissues. In turn, biology offers an enormous range of 

engaging problems in functional biological systems, and the opportunity to think about “hybrid” systems 

that combine biological and non-biological components.

Cluster II: Nanoscale Building Blocks

Addresses the synthesis of new classes of nanostructures that exhibit size-dependent properties, with 

an emphasis on structures with unconventional shapes, as well as on zero-, one- and two-dimensional 

nanostructures based on metal chalcogenides, and the incorporation of nanostructures into novel devices.

Cluster III: Imaging Electrons

Imaging Electrons at the Nanoscale explores new ways to image the quantum behavior of electrons inside 

nanostructures using custom-made scanning probe microscopes (SPMs). Semiconductor heterostructures 

with novel properties are grown using Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE).

The Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center (NSEC) is a research collaboration with Harvard University, 

the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of California-Santa Barbara, and the Museum of 

Science-Boston with participation by Delft University of Technology (Netherlands), the University of Basel 

(Switzerland), the University of Tokyo (Japan), and the Brookhaven National Laboratory, the Oak Ridge 

National Laboratory, and the Sandia National Laboratory.

III. Education Activities within the University 

Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU)

Description: NSEC-supported REU students work closely with faculty, graduate students, staff, and 

postdoctoral researchers on individual research projects for 10 weeks.

Staff/Expertise: The REU Program is coordinated by Dr. Kathryn Hollar, Director of Educational 

♦

♦
3

Programs for the Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences. She holds a PhD in Chemical 

Engineering, and has taught chemical and general engineering courses, as well as preparatory programs 

for graduate teaching assistants.

Goals and Objectives:

To encourage a diverse group of future scientists and engineers to pursue careers in nanoscale science 

& engineering

To increase awareness of research areas available for graduate studies

To give graduate students and postdoctoral researchers preparation and experience in project 

management

Target Audience:

In 2005, a total of 49 students were funded through our joint programs, which span various science 

and engineering disciplines. Of these students, 17 students were mentored by 11 NSEC-supported 

faculty, and additional 4 interns were funded by NNIN.

Students were recruited from a variety of institutions, and ranged from rising sophomores to rising 

seniors. 27% of the students were from underrepresented groups in science and engineering, and 

over 50% were female.

Current Activities: The REU interns also participate in a structured program of professional 

development seminars and workshops, from presentation skills to faculty-led research talks as part of our 

larger joint REU program that funded 49 students in summer 2005.

Nano S&E Content Focus: Students supported by NSEC funds participated in projects that were 

within NSEC cluster themes.

Applied Physics 298r  Interdisciplinary Chemistry, Physics, and Engineeri

Description: Graduate and advanced undergraduate students participate in AP298r, Interdisciplinary 

Chemistry, Engineering and Physics, an interdisciplinary graduate survey course of ongoing research at the 

Center. 

Staff/Expertise: The course is taught by Professor Robert M. Westervelt. Faculty from the NSEC gave 

20 lectures during the spring semester.

Goals and Objectives: To give graduate students and advanced undergraduates the opportunity to 

explore the research areas within the NSEC. 

Target Audience: Graduate students and advanced undergraduates Over 25 students enrolled in the 

course in Spring 2005.

Current Activities: Students enrolled in the course prepare a presentation and paper on a selected topic, 

in addition to attending all seminars.

Nano S&E Content Focus: Course requirements include a paper and oral presentation on one of the 

topics. Course handouts and faculty presentations can be downloaded at www.nsec.harvard.edu/AP298.

htm.

♦

◊

◊

◊

♦

◊

◊

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
3

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Research Exchange Seminar

Description: This postdoctoral and graduate student researcher-led seminar was held biweekly on 

Tuesday at lunchtime during the academic year (2004-05).

Goals and Objectives: To encourage NSEC postdoctoral fellows and graduate students to learn about 

each other’s research. The Exchange seminar blossomed into a venue where graduate students could get 

the advice of the postdoctoral fellows on preparation for oral presentation and then give their talk at the 

Exchange.

Target Audience: Graduate students and postdoctoral researchers

Current Activities: Speakers and topics have been suggested for next fall and many of the presentations 

during the past year have been presented in shortened form at professional society meetings.

Nano S&E Content Focus: Presentations are based on NSEC-funded research.

Postdoctoral Fellowship Program for Members of Underrepresented Groups

Description: We have established Center fellowships to encourage the participation of women and 

members of underrepresented groups in science and engineering. 

Goals and Objectives: To provide support and professional development for members of 

underrepresented groups in science and engineering so that they may become leaders in their fields.

Target Audience: Members from underrepresented groups in science and engineering. Thus far, 5 

Fellows have been funded. 

Current Activities: These Fellows are integrated into the research and educational community of the 

NSEC, and connections with faculty and institutes across the university are facilitated through this 

program. Access to research facilities and educational and professional development opportunities helps 

develop a strong pool of well-prepared researchers for faculty positions and the scientific community.

Nano S&E Content focus: Fellows participate in many NSEC educational and outreach activities.

IV. Education Activities Outside the University

Activities at the Museum of Science, Boston

Description: The participants and their colleagues develop innovative science communication strategies 

for enhancing public understanding of research in nanoscale science and engineering, engaging a broad 

range of audiences at the Museum of Science and elsewhere.

Program Staff & Expertise:

Carol Lynn Alpert, NSEC Director for Public Engagement and Director of Strategic Projects at the 

Museum of Science

Daniel Davis, Education Associate for Nanoscale Science & Engineering

Adam Weiss and Greg Murray, Education Associates for Current Science & Technology, Museum 

of Science, Boston

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

◊

◊

◊
3

Goals and Objectives: To enhance public understanding of nanoscale science and engineering, and 

to provide communications expertise and resources to scientists and engineers in nanoscale science & 

engineering.

Target Audience: K-gray; public audiences

Current Activities

Monthly Live New England Cable News Cablecasts have informed an audience of over 1.6 million 

viewers 

Reaching a national audience via Cable TV

Live presentations on the Current Science & Technology (CS&T) stage at the Museum of Science, 

Boston; over 160 presentations have reached more than 5400 museum visitors

Guest Researcher Appearances on the CS&T Stage, featuring NSEC researchers, have engaged over 

400 museum visitors

Nanotech Consumer Products Display

Communicating Science workshop with REU and RET participants impacted over 45 

undergraduates and teachers.

Multimedia Research Updates for Touchscreens and Web

Nanotech Symposium for Teachers and Guidance Counselors scheduled for November 2005

For more information, see www.mos.org/nano and http://www.nsec.harvard.edu/pages/education_

mos.htm. 

Nano S&E Content Focus: Broadly focused, highlighted by ongoing research in the NSEC based at 

Harvard University

Research Experience for Teachers

Description: The NSEC, in collaboration with an REU/RET Site in Materials Research and 

Engineering, hosted 7 teachers in 2004 and 5 teachers in 2005. These teachers work side-by-side with 

faculty, postdoctoral researchers, graduate students, and REU participants on research or science 

curriculum projects at Harvard University. Program Staff and Expertise: The RET program is 

coordinated by Dr. Kathryn Hollar, Director of Educational Programs for the Division of Engineering 

and Applied Sciences.

Goals and Objectives: Teachers commit to 6–8 weeks during the summer, and are invited for a second 

summer to refine educational modules that are developed as a result of their research experience. Goals 

of the program are to develop long-term relationships with these teachers and their home school systems 

and infuse the high school science curriculum with tested examples of nanotech applications that can be 

widely disseminated to impact many students and teachers.

Target Audience: High school teachers in the Eastern Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Rhode Island 

area, with a focus on recruiting from urban school districts, including the Cambridge Public Schools.

Current Activities: This program has resulted in educational modules and several initiatives and 

partnerships that extend beyond the summer experience, including planning for the Nanotech 

Symposium for teachers at the Museum of Science, Boston.

♦

♦

♦

◊

◊

◊

◊

◊

◊

◊

◊

◊

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Nano S&E Content Focus: Teachers have developed projects in soft lithography, laboratories in current 

and voltage, and developing high school ConcepTests in chemistry, physics, and biology.

Small Scale Science Seminar for Teachers in the Cambridge Public Schools

Description: Faculty and postdoctoral researchers funded by the NSEC developed lectures on ongoing 

research for teachers in the Cambridge Public Schools as part of the teachers’ professional development 

requirement.

Goals and Objectives: To provide teachers with ideas for incorporating nano-focused research and 

concepts into their curriculum, and to encourage teachers to participate in the RET program.

Program Staff and Expertise: The seminar series was coordinated by Dr. Kathryn Hollar, Director of 

Educational Programs for the Division of Engineering & Applied Sciences, in collaboration with Dr. 

Melanie Barron, Science Curriculum Coordinator for Cambridge Public Schools, and Maureen Havern, 

teacher liaison for the NSF GK12 collaboration between Harvard and Cambridge Public Schools.

Current Activities: Faculty and researchers in the NSEC will continue to deliver presentations for 

teachers in the 2005-2006 school year that are focused on the tools for integrated nanobiology. These 

presentations will also be available for students enrolled in the new course, Research Internships, at 

Cambridge Rindge and Latin School.

Nano S&E Content Focus: Faculty, postdoctoral researchers, RETs, and graduate students presented 

topics in nano- and small-scale research, including nanowires, microfluidics, and soft lithography.

Nano S&E Content Consultants: The program also featured presentations and discussions with 

Nanotech Education Associates Dr. Daniel Davis and Joel Rosenberg of the Museum of Science, Boston.

V. Education Outreach Materials

Describe and provide examples of materials, outlines, demonstrations, etc. developed for outreach 

activities for the K-12 and/or informal audiences

Soft Lithography: Fabrication on the Micrometer and Nanometer Scale. Developed by Colleen 

O’Shell (Chemistry, Cambridge Public Schools, MA), Christina Talbot (Physical Sciences, Memorial 

High School, Manchester, NH), Logan McCarty (Graduate Student advised by Prof. George 

Whitesides). The concept of fabricating micro- and nanostructures using soft lithography is tailored in 

a straightforward experiment for high school students using polymers, metal deposition, and chemical 

etching. This experiment applies the two most common methods of pattern transfer known as molding 

and printing. Students create a polymer stamp of a master pattern. Through a chemical deposition 

process a glass slide is coated with a silver film. The stamp is swabbed with hexadecanthiol and printed 

on the glass slide. The print creates a self-assembled monolayer, a molecule thick, that acts as a resist 

on the silver surface. The printed glass slide is then passed through an etching solution that removes 

the silver that has not been printed. The polymer stamp is also placed on another polymer substrate 

where a solvent can be applied. The solvent, through capillarity, draws the polymer into the crevices of 

the stamp. After evaporation of the solvent occurs the stamp is removed leaving the polymer substrate 

with a pattern that is the reverse of the stamp and a copy of the master. The adaptability of this process 

to recreating most small scale patterns allows students to envision the applications of this process 

beyond the laboratory into every day use. This experiment promotes comprehension of soft lithography, 

nanotechnology, polymerization, polymers, redox equations, covalent bonding, solubility and chemical 

and physical properties. This experiment was piloted at Harvard University during the summer of 2005 

with high school students with varied chemistry knowledge.

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
Dissemination format: This module will be available on the www.eduprograms.deas.harvard.edu 

website, and will be disseminated through the Nanotechnology Symposium for Teachers and Guidance 

Counselors at the Museum of Science, Boston in November 2005. Conference presentations are also 

planned.

Describe a recent successful education outreach activity

In July 13 and August 3, 2005, the joint REU programs and NSEC researchers hosted over 25 Junior 

Scholars from the Crimson Summer Academy, as part of their Career Explorations program. The Crimson 

Summer Academy is a Harvard-funded program that brings economically-disadvantaged students of high 

potential to Harvard in 3 consecutive summers in a rigorous college and career preparation program. During 

their visit to the Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Junior scholars had a lunch-time discussion 

with REU students from diverse institutions and backgrounds, graduate students, and postdoctoral 

researchers. Topics covered included selecting a college, why panel members chose science as a career, and 

financial aid options. Junior Scholars then participated in brief presentations and lab tours on nanobiology 

and femtosecond laser research. The day culminated in a lecture by an NSEC faculty member and a 

reception.

Benefits of this collaboration include increasing awareness of science and engineering career paths for 

underrepresented groups in S&E. The program also engaged visiting undergraduates (many of them from 

underrepresented groups), graduate students, postdoctoral researchers, and faculty in the broader educational 

programs of the NSEC in a format that emphasized the community present in the NSEC and in DEAS.

VI. Education Outreach Evaluation

Summarize outreach evaluation plan

REU and RET programs involve on-line exit surveys of program participants, including undergraduates, 

teachers, graduate students, postdoctoral researchers, staff, and faculty. These surveys are adapted from 

existing models, including those developed by Dr. Fiona Goodchild (RET) and Dr. Mari Goldman (REU).

Teachers who attend workshops are asked to fill out an evaluation at the end of each workshop.

Summarize outreach evaluation results

The REU and RET programs are rated highly successful by participants in the areas of the mentor 

relationship, professional development activities, social interaction, and diversity of participants. Mentor 

evaluations in 2004 indicated a need for more pre-program training, which we addressed in early 2005, and 

plan to strengthen in 2006.

Teachers rated workshops as high quality, but requested more hands-on modules and assistance in 

implementing concepts into the curriculum.

VII. Lessons Learned

List 2-3 lessons learned to share with others embarking on a nano education outreach effort

Develop long-term relationships and collaborations with school systems and teachers, and follow up 

regularly.

Listen to collaborators and respond to needs by providing the right resources and connections.

Describe what you might do differently in the future

♦

♦

♦
3

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

More front-end formal evaluation so that impacts can be assessed more accurately.

More training of researchers in public engagement skills.

♦

♦

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Appendix 4: Johns Hopkins University/Materials Res

Science and Engineering Center P

I. Description

Institution: Johns Hopkins University

PI: Chia-Ling Chien

Co-PIs: Howard E. Katz, Robert L. Leheny, Nina Markovic, Daniel H. Reich, Peter C, Searson, Kathleen J. 

Stebe, Mark Stiles, Oleg Tchernyshyov, Gang Xiao, Jian-Gang Zhu

Title: Materials Research Science and Engineering Center

Proposal: 0520491

Program Officer: Maija Kukla

Education Outreach Director: Daniel H. Reich, reich@jhu.edu

II. Research Agenda

Research Focus: The Interdisciplinary Research Group of the JHU MRSEC focuses on the exploration of 

new materials and new fundamental phenomena in magnetic nanostructures with potentially novel magnetoelectronic applications.

MRSEC Description

The JHU MRSEC is a single-IRG MRSEC, centered at Johns Hopkins, with additional co-PIs at Brown 

University, Carnegie Mellon University, and NIST.

III. Education Activities within the University

Description of activities

REU: we run a summer REU program for 6-8 students, who do research in MRSEC labs. Students are 

recruited from across the US.

High School Student Summer Internships: Each summer, eight students from the greater Baltimore 

area spend four weeks working with MRSEC researchers. This program is designed to introduce highly 

motivated high school students to materials research by providing an in-depth research project in the 

MRSEC setting. 

High School Teacher Summer Internships: Physics and chemistry teachers from Baltimore-Washington 

area high schools participate in one-week internships each summer. The program provides teacher 

interns with the opportunity to enhance their scientific knowledge through hands-on workshops, to 

develop new demonstrations, experiments, and student projects, and to establish contacts for future 

access to the MRSEC’s educational resources.

RET: This two-summer-long program provides in-depth research experience that culminates in 

educational modules and demonstrations created by the teachers for their own use and for dissemination 

over the MRSEC website to other teachers across the country.

Physics Fair: The MRSEC co-sponsors the JHU annual Physics Fair, whose goal is to generate 

excitement and fascination in the physical sciences for K-12 students. The program includes more than 

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
100 demonstrations run by 50 undergraduate and graduate students, including many MRSEC graduate 

students. The program also includes physics challenge tests, a “Physics Bowl” contest, and a “Physics 

Show” given by a suitably charismatic physics professor.

Materials Science Outreach Workshop: The MRSEC holds periodic outreach workshops on current 

themes in materials science and engineering. The events are designed to foster interest in science among 

middle school students and their families, and to promote careers in science. The program is a mix of 

lecture-style presentations, and hands-on workshops. The most recent, Explorations in Nanoscale Science 

and Engineering, attracted 299 middle school students and 292 parents from 12 states.

Program staff and expertise

All programs are conducted by MRSEC members. Logistical and recruitment support for some programs is 

provided by the JHU Center for Talented Youth.

Goals and objectives

(see above)

Target audience (educational levels, number of students at each level, etc.)

(see above)

Current activities

Anticipated outcomes and/or deliverables (see above)

Nano S&E content focus

Programs 1-4 above are built around the nanoscience research in MRSEC laboratories. Program 5 is not 

specifically nano. Program 6 had broader focus to include nano-bio research and other nanoscience 

programs at JHU as well as MRSEC research.

IV. Education Activities Outside the University 

Description of activities

“Inventors of the Future” Mentoring Program: This new program, beginning this year, seeks to interest 

and motivate students in inner-city high schools to study science and mathematics by providing resources 

for independent study and research projects. The program, created in partnership by JHU, CMU, the 

National Inventors Hall of Fame, and the Washington Academy of Sciences, is funded by NSF’s Urban 

Systemic Program. Student participants will be drawn from inner-city high schools in Baltimore, Pittsburgh, 

and Washington, DC. MRSEC faculty and researchers will serve as mentors and consultants to both 

participating students and teachers.

Program staff and expertise

Goals and objectives

Target audience (grade levels, number of students at each level, school districts, etc.)

Current activities

Anticipated outcomes and/or deliverables (student awareness, teacher professional development, curriculum 

materials, classroom demonstrations, etc.)

♦
K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Nano S&E content focus

Nano S & E content consultants

V. Education Outreach Materials

Describe and provide examples of materials, outlines, demonstrations, etc. developed for outreach 

activities for the K-12 and/or informal audiences

As an example, RET participants have created web-based modules on x-ray diffraction, and molecular 

dynamics simulations for use in high school classrooms. These are available on the MRSEC website. Our 

high school teacher internship provides half-day or full-day workshops on areas including: characterization 

of crystal structures and nanostructures diffraction, e-beam and photolithography, scanning electron 

microscopy, and electrodeposition of nanomaterials. Versions of many of these activities suitable for 

classroom use have been developed, and instructions are made available to the participants.

Describe a recent successful education outreach activity

Our most recent Materials Science Outreach Workshop, Explorations in Nanoscale Science and Engineering, 

attracted 299 middle school students and 292 parents from 12 states. It featured two keynote lectures for 

all participants on “What is nanoscience?” and “Nanomaterials for tissue engineering.” The students, in groups 

of 15, each participated in 3 50-minute hands-on workshops ranging from “Magnetic Nanowires in Liquid 

Crystals,” to “Deposition of Nanoparticle-Based Phosphors.” During the workshops, a separate lecture 

program was run for the parents on topics including “Magnetoelectronics” and “Micro and Nanofluidic 

Technology.”

VI. Education Outreach Evaluation

Summarize outreach evaluation plan

We conduct exit interviews, follow-up interviews, and surveys of participants. We track the career paths of 

former high-school student interns. 

Summarize outreach evaluation results

Feedback from participants has led to improvements in several programs, for example, the HS Teachers 

Internships, where we have adjusted the schedule and content to better suit their needs. 

VII. Lessons Learned

List 2-3 lessons learned to share with others embarking on a nano education outreach effort

A key ingredient for success is close contact between participants and the MRSEC members. Wherever 

possible, try to emphasize one-on-one mentoring in a research environment.

Describe what you might do differently in the future

Arrange so that HS teachers can get Continuing Education credit for participation in MRSEC programs.
4
4

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Appendix 5: Northeastern University/Center f

High-rate Nanomanufacturing P

I. Description

Institutions: Northeastern University, University of Massachusetts Lowell, and University of New 

Hampshire

PI: Ahmed A. Busnaina

Co-PIs : Joey L. Mead, Carol M. F. Barry, Nicol McGruer, and Glen P. Miller

Title: Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center for High-rate Nanomanufacturing

Proposal: 0425826

Program Officer: Delcie Durham

Education Outreach Director: Carol Barry, Carol_Barry@uml.edu

II. Research Agenda

Research Focus: High-rate, high-volume, template-directed self-assembly of nanoelements, including 

nanotubes and polymers, along with concurrent assessment of environmental, economic, and societal impact 

of the developed technology.

NSEC Description: Nanomanufacturing

III. Primary Education Activities within the Universities

Description of activities

Undergraduate course modules. CHN is currently adding content to existing courses, particularly in 

required freshman, sophomore, and junior courses, at the three institutions.

Courses for non-science and non-engineering majors. Courses will be developed from an existing 

Nanoscale Undergraduate Education (NUE) project at UML 

Goal (1,2): a) Expose undergraduates in the core institutions to nanotechnology and interest some of 

them in nanomanufacturing careers. b) Disseminate modules to other universities.

Program staff (1,2): No staff. With the exception of UNH teaching post-doctoral researcher, course 

materials are being developed by NEU, UML, and UNH faculty with small stipends to cover faculty 

time, supplies, etc.

Target audience: (1) Overall, 5000+ NEU, UML, and UNH science and engineering 

undergraduates. (2) More non-technical majors in any year of their education.

Current activities: (1) During 2005-2006, CHN will sponsor the development and implementation 

“nanomodules” for engineering materials, general and organic chemistry, ethics, and other courses. 

Funding for the 2006-2007 academic year will emphasize expansion of the portfolio of modules and 

dissemination of the tested modules. (2) Developed for face-to-face and on-line delivery, the current 

course, “Introduction to NanoEngineering,” was offered for the first time in spring 2005 and will be 

offered again in spring 2006.

♦

♦

◊

◊

◊

◊
4

nanomanufacturing and its societal implications. 

Graduate courses. CHN is developing and delivering cross-university seminar courses

Goal: Prepare full and part-time3

 graduate students in the core institutions for nanomanufacturing 

careers. 

Program staff: Course materials are being developed by NEU, UML, and UNH faculty. Distance 

learning support from Universities, with some extra funds from CHN. 

Target audience: Currently, full and part-time graduate students plus seniors (as elective) at NEU, 

UML, and UNH. Eventually, distance delivery to others. 

Current activities: (1) During spring 2005, CHN delivered a, “Introduction to High-rate, 

Template-based Nanomanufacturing,” with an attendance of 80 students. (2) A full hybrid course, 

“Nanomanufacturing I,” will be delivered via web and video conferencing during fall 2005. (3) 

Additional jointly-developed graduate courses are planned for spring 2006 and beyond. (4) In 

addition, faculty member at participating institutions have developed courses for delivery at their 

home institutions. (5) The Institutional Advisory Board (engineering deans, etc.) are currently 

working on an articulation agreement for these single-institution courses.

Nano S&E content focus: Nanomanufacturing processes and their societal implications.

Research experiences for undergraduates. A 10-week long research program with a professional 

development component.

Goal: Involve undergraduates in nanomanufacturing research and interest some of them in 

nanomanufacturing careers. 

Program staff: NEU and UNH added REUs to existing programs for some professional 

development. UML partially tied to NEU program. 

Target audience: Undergraduates at other institutions, particularly HBCUs. 

Current activities: (1) Sixteen undergraduates participated during summer 2005, but most were 

from CHN’s core Universities. (2) During 2006, an additional nine undergraduates (funded from 

an REU supplement) will be added to the 16 students funded through CHN. (3) We also plan to 

expand the professional development component. 

Nano S&E content focus: CHN nanomanufacturing research plus professional development. 

Students participated in ethical reflection workshop for all researchers in June 2005.

Safety training for CHN researchers. A half-day workshop on safety issues associated with 

nanomanufacturing.

Goal: Make all CHN researchers aware of worker health and environmental issues associated with 

nanomanufacturing processes. This workshop is an addition to current safety training at each 

University. 

Program staff: Michael Ellenbecker, director of UML’s Toxics Use Reduction Institute and CHN 

researcher. 

Target audience: All CHN researchers (faculty, post-docs and students).

Current activities: Safety training began in spring 2005 and CHN will have three workshops 

during September, 2005. 

◊

♦

◊

◊

◊

◊

◊

♦

◊

◊

◊

◊

◊

♦

◊

◊

◊

◊

3

 NEU and UML have large numbers of part-time graduate students.
K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Nano S&E content focus: Good practices for safe nanomanufacturing. 

Societal impact workshops for CHN researchers. Workshops on the societal impact of 

nanomanufacturing. 

Goal: Make all CHN researchers aware societal issues associated with nanomanufacturing processes 

and research in general. 

Program staff: Various. Donna Qualters and Perrin Cohen, NEU, led the June 2005 workshop.

Target audience: All CHN researchers.

Current activities: (1) A half-day workshop on an ethical reflection model for assessing research 

issues was attended by 60 CHN undergraduate, graduate, and post-doctoral researchers in June 

2005. (2) A workshop on regulatory issues is planned for fall 2005. 

Nano S&E content focus: Societal impact of nanomanufacturing.

IV. Primary Education Activities Outside the Universities

Description of activities:

Research experiences for teachers. A 6-week long research program with professional and curriculum 

development (NEU and UML only). 

Goal: a) Allow teachers to participate in nanomanufacturing research. b) Have teachers develop 

modules to introduce nanotechnology to their students.

Program staff: Researchers from NEU and UML with professional development handled by 

CESAME program at NEU (under direction of Claire Duggan). 

Target audience: High school and middle school teachers teaching math and/or science in 

Massachusetts schools. 

Current activities: Four teachers participated during summer 2005. 

Nano S&E content focus: CHN nanomanufacturing research plus professional and curriculum 

development. 

Nano S & E content consultants: See staff.

Summer teacher institute. A week long professional development plus curriculum development program 

(UNH only). 

Goal: a) Expose teachers to nanomanufacturing research. b) Have teachers develop modules to 

introduce nanotechnology to their students. 

Program staff: Researchers from UNH plus UNH’s K-12 staff person, Susan Greenberg

Target audience: Teachers from New Hampshire schools. 

Current activities: Successful initial workshop during summer 2005. 

Nano S&E content focus: CHN nanomanufacturing research plus curriculum development. 

Nano S & E content consultants: See staff.

Workshops for industry. Workshops on technical and societal issues associated with 

nanomanufacturing. 

◊

♦

◊

◊

◊

◊

◊

♦

◊

◊

◊

◊

◊

◊

♦

◊

◊

◊

◊

◊

◊

♦
Goal: Provide industry practitioners with targeted information on nanomanufacturing. 

Program staff: Various. Michael Ellenbecker, UML, will lead October workshop. 

Target audience: Industry practitioners and other interested parties.

Current activities: (1) Third New England International Nanomanufacturing Workshop provided 

two days of technical information on nanomanufacturing as well as a half-day session on the safety 

aspects of nanoparticles. (2) A half-day workshop on nanoparticle safety will be held in October, 

2005. 

Nano S&E content focus: Good practices for safe nanomanufacturing. 

Nano S & E content consultants: None. NEU and UML have considerable experience with 

industry workshops. 

Nanomanufacturing at MOS. Exhibits, interactive presentations, etc. will be 

Goal: (1) Expose general public to the differences between nanotechnology and nanomanufacturing. 

(2) Expose general public to benefits and issues associated with nanomanufacturing. 

Program staff: Carol Lynn Alpert, Museum of Science (Boston) and two half time MOS staff

Target audience: General public.

Current activities: This program is just getting started4

. 

Nano S & E content consultants: See staff.

V. Education Outreach Materials

Describe and provide examples of materials, outlines, demonstrations, etc. developed for outreach 

activities for the K-12 and/or informal audiences

CHN is just starting with education outreach, and thus, curricula are under development by teachers who 

participated in this summer’s RET and Summer Institute programs.

Describe a recent successful education outreach activity

RET and Summer Institute programs were very successful, with K-12 teachers enjoying their time at the 

Universities. For example, after successfully injection molding nanoscale features at UML, the three UML 

teacher-researchers attempted to use tooling made by two NEU teacher-researchers. Although this was 

initially unsuccessful, the teachers intend to try again so that parts with be available for the curriculum 

module developed by the NEU-based teachers. 

VI. Education Outreach Evaluation

Summarize outreach evaluation plan. (1) Eric Heller from U Mass Amherst’s Donahue Institute is the lead 

evaluator for all but the MOS program. Evaluation of current course work and summer institute has been 

through questionnaires. REU students were evaluated through focus groups and a separate questionnaire. (2) 

Evaluation of the RET program at NEU and UML is tied to the overall CESAME RET program. (3) Carol 

Lynn Alpert is currently selecting an evaluator for the MOS program. 

◊

◊

◊

◊

◊

◊

♦

◊

◊

◊

◊

◊

4

 MOS program was delayed because it is partially funded by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 
4

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Summarize outreach evaluation results. Results are currently available only for spring 2005 graduate 

course. This course met the goals of familiarizing CHN researchers with all aspects of the Center’s research 

and developing in those researchers an awareness of the non-technical impacts of their decisions. The CHN 

researchers did not like the round robin traveling required to deliver the course alternately at NEU, UML, 

and UNH, but did like the interacting with colleagues from the other institutions. 

VII. Lessons Learned

List 2-3 lessons learned to share with others embarking on a nano education outreach effort. (1)

Linking with existing programs was worthwhile because you accessed prior knowledge from the program 

coordinators. (2) Freshmen courses are difficult to penetrate because of the current content. (3) Coordinating 

courses between three Universities is a challenge. 

Describe what you might do differently in the future. Need experienced K-12 coordinator at each 

institution. Susan Greenberg’s connections in New Hampshire have been valuable, but we are currently 

seeking additional funds for such a coordinator at UML.

47

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

APPENDIX 6: OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY/NSEC PROFILE

I. Description

Institution: Ohio State University

PI : Ly James Lee

Co-PIs: Jeff rey J. Chalmers, Albert T. Conlisk, M. Ferrari, Robert J. Lee 

Title: NSEC for Aff ordable Nanoengineering of Polymer Biomedical Devices

Proposal: 0425626

Program Offi cer: Bruce Kramer

Education Outreach Director: Paula Stephenson, Ph.D., nsec.ohio-state.edu

II. Research Agenda

Research Focus: Th e primary goal of the center is to develop polymer based, low cost nanoengineering 

technology that can be used to produce nanofl uidic devices and multifunctional poly-nanoparticlebiomolecule nanostructures for next generation medical diagnostics and therapeutic applications. Th e 

research plan is comprised of three thrust areas. In the Nanomanufacturing Th rust Area, we combine 

aff ordable and environmentally and biologically-benign ‘top-down’ fabrication and ‘bottom-up’ molecular 

self-assembly techniques to produce well-defi ned passive and active nanoparticles and nanostructures. In 

the Transport Phenomena Th rust Area, the research aim is to achieve design capabilities at the nanoscale, and 

multiphase transport structures. In the Biocompatibility Th rust Area, our current eff ort focuses on 3D tissue 

engineering designs for advanced cytotoxicity testing.

III. Education Activities for Undergraduates and Graduate Students

Long-range plans for education and human resource development for undergraduate and graduate 

students are integrating the latest research developments into a practical student curriculum leading to a 

nanobiotechnology minor for undergraduate students and a professional certifi cate for graduate students. Th e 

multidisciplinary program summarized in the following table will: (1) develop and off er at least 5 entirely 

new courses (of which 3 are core courses covering aspects of the Center’s research theme); (2) modify at least 

8 recently-introduced courses to better align with the center’s research theme; (3) expand 3 IGERT courses 

to NSEC students; and (4) use existing relevant courses from the participating departments. In the current 

environment, courses at OSU tend to be off ered by departments for their own students in relative isolation. 

Th e center’s new focus provides the incentive and structure for developing an integrated curriculum across 

disciplines, beginning at the freshman level. At least two new NSEC courses will be phased in every year to 

maintain a reasonable faculty and administrative workload. Guest lecturers will be drawn from faculty of 

partner universities, industry, national laboratory partners, and international collaborators. In addition to 

technical courses that target upper division science and engineering students, we will develop the course Size 

Matters: Nanotechnology in Human Life and Society to bring the center’s activities to a general undergraduate 

student population, as well as to the general public via videotape or CDs. A new lab module on Design of 

Nanoscale Biodevices will be developed and introduced through a design-and-build experience to nearly 1000 

freshman engineering students at OSU each year.
48

Courses will be cross-listed in participating departments. Th e first two courses listed in the following table 

are new undergraduate courses/lab modules that target freshmen students to draw them into further studies 

and careers in nanobiotechnology. Th e next three courses emphasize fundamentals of nanofl uidic device 

fabrication and will be required core courses in the minor and certifi cate. Th e following four courses are 

electives based upon particular research interests. Th e last three courses emphasize modeling and provide the 

foundation for the design and execution of advanced research. Our preliminary curriculum design calls for 

the minor and certifi cate to include the 3 core courses supplemented by 4 elective courses chosen from other 

new and established courses in participating units at OSU. 

Related courses are available at OSU for designing a specialized program of study in topics of polymers 

(processing fundamentals/membranes, polymer science and engineering, rheology, particle technology, 

colloids and surfaces, conducting polymer devices); nanostructures (quantum chemistry, electronic spectra, 

structure of molecules, high precision machining, thermodynamics, fl uid dynamics/mechanics, heat/mass 

transfer, tribology; quantum mechanics, and atomic molecular physics); and biomedicine (micro/nanodevices 

biological transport, biomaterials, biochemistry, drug delivery). 

Nanobiotechnology Curriculum for Undergraduate (U) and Graduate (G) Students

Blue = New NSEC courses, Green = Modifi ed courses, Black= IGERT/other courses for NSEC students

Existing and New Courses Level Participating NSEC Faculty

------------------------------------------------------Freshman Courses-------------------------------------------

SIZE MATTERS: Nanotechnology in Human Life and 

Society

U Koelling, Tomasko, Agarwal

Fundamentals of Engineering: (add lab module on Design of 

Nanoscale Biodevices)

U Tomasko, Rathman, Hansford

----------------------------------------Introduction to Nanobiotechnology------------------------------------

Nanobiotechnology Seminar (core course) U G LJ Lee, Conlisk,Olesik,R 

Lee,Chalmers

Principles of Biomedical Devices (core course) U G Hansford, Agarwal, 

Desai (BU)

Nanofabrication (core course) U G Lu, LJ Lee, Hansford, Yi 

------------------------------------------------Specialization Courses--------------------------------------------
K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Molecular Nanotechnology U G Rathman, Frechet (UCB), new 

OES in Chem E

Measurement at the Nanoscale U G Menq, Koelling 

Nanotechnology in Medical Diagnosis U G Chalmers, LJ Lee, Bashir (PUR)

Nanotechnology in Advanced Therapy U G Kniss, B Lee, Lannutti, Yang

---------------------------------Fundamentals at the Nanoscale for Graduate Students-------------------

Interfacial Phenomena and Biological Functionalization G Agarwal, Cooper, Rathman, 

Micro/Nano-Fluidics: Design and Modeling G Conlisk, Hansford, LJ Lee, Fan

Molecular Modeling and Simulation of Materials G Singer, Ghosh, Peters (FAMU/

FSU), OES Mech Eng

----------------------IGERT Courses Extended to NSEC Fellows and Other Students ------------------

Introduction: Molecular Engineering of Microdevices 

(MEMD)

U G Lannutti, LJ Lee

Seminar: Future trends in MEMD, mgt. skills, globalization U G LJ Lee

MEMD course on Membrane Science and Technology U G Ho, Tomasko

Additional educational elements will enhance the center’s education objectives:

SEC Fellow Advisory Teams. A primary advisor, one or more co-advisors, and an external mentor will 

jointly advise each fellow in research in one of the thrust areas.

Undergraduate Mentoring and Outreach. Under faculty oversight, NSEC Fellows will mentor/supervise 

undergraduate students in the freshman design course’s new nanobiotech module, in REU research, 

and in senior honors research theses. Undergraduate students will also participate in supervised K-12 

outreach.

Undergraduate Summer Research Internships. Five non-OSU honors undergraduate students will be 

selected each summer to carry out fulltime research at OSU under center supervision, for a total of 25 

students over the five-year period of the center. These students will be supported by related REU awards. 

Fellow Teaching/Outreach. To gain teaching and leadership experience, under faculty supervision center 

Fellows will serve one quarter assisting NSEC courses and working with undergraduate students on 

research.

♦

♦

♦

♦
50

Web and CD-based Courses. Teaching modules will be developed for NSEC undergraduate instruction 

and promoted for use by academicians worldwide, based on the two freshman courses. The modules 

will integrate class Powerpoint presentations with edited transcripts following the model successfully 

implemented by OSU Welding Engineering and distributed to industry. Modules will also be distributed 

through relevant professional associations. 

Additional Fellow Support. To increase the number of graduate fellows supported by the Center, doctoral 

students will only be supported for 4 years using a phase-in plan, with the other 1-2 years funded from 

other sources. Partial cost-sharing for center masters-level students will also be requested.

Project Staff: NSEC Education Committee, Paula Stevenson, Education and Outreach Director, Professor 

David Tomasko, Professor Susan Olesik, Professor Terry Conlisk

Goals and Objectives: To provide a various levels of understanding of nanoscience and engineering to 

undergraduate and graduate students in addition to professional scientists. 

Target Audience: Undergraduate and Graduate Students and Professional Scientists.

Current Activities:

Curriculum Planning. In autumn quarter 2004, existing courses at OSU were inventoried and the 

requirements for establishing a new minor were reviewed. A draft structure for a minor in nanoscience and 

technology was prepared in winter quarter 2005 by the Education and Outreach Committee, incorporating 

new, revised, and existing courses. The Committee is currently planning an additional, new anchor course 

to help undergraduate students bridge the gap between traditional departmental courses and other courses 

in the NSEC curriculum. A syllabus is under development for the junior-level course “Fundamentals of 

Molecular Nanotechnology,” currently envisioned to include four modules taught from the perspectives of 

Chemical Engineering, Chemistry, Electrical Engineering, and Physics. A proposal will be prepared and 

submitted this summer to curriculum committees in the College of Engineering and the College of Math 

and Physical Sciences. Following submission of the minor proposal, a similar proposal will be prepared to 

establish a Graduate Certificate or Graduate Specialization in nanobiotechnology.

Course Development. Four related new courses and one revised/expanded course have been offered to date, 

exceeding our proposed plans as outlined above.

The new nanobiotechnology core seminar course (LJ Lee/ChBE) was offered in Winter Quarter 2005. Topics 

included molecular self-assembly, nanotechnology, biotechnology, sensor technology, and bio/nanoethics. 

A majority of the speakers were NSEC thrust area leaders discussing the Center’s long-range research goals, 

and faculty from the participating universities (PUR, BU, UCB, JHU, and UA). Thirty students from 8 

departments (4 colleges) formally enrolled in the course, and an additional 10 or so students attended the 

course each week. NSEC, NIRT, and relevant IGERT students participated. Students formed research 

subgroups around topics of common interest and delivered presentations on the joint projects. The 

research subgroup meetings are expected to continue throughout the year to enhance communication and 

collaboration. Over 95% of the students gave the course an overall rating of “agree strongly” or “agree” (in 

summary) that the course was well-organized, intellectually stimulating, encouraged students to think for 

themselves, and other measures.

A second new course was developed and offered in winter quarter 05, Fundamentals of Biomedical 

Microscopic Imaging (Agarwal/BME). Offered to senior undergraduate students and graduate students, 

several NSEC students and some non-NSEC students enrolled. The course taught principles and described 

various microscopy techniques (light, electron and atomic force microscopy) for application to biomedical 

♦

♦
51

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

research. Students were required to carry out “virtual microscopy” sessions available via internet.

The third new course, also offered in Winter Quarter 2005, is Polymer-Based Electronic and Magnetic 

Materials (Epstein/Chem/Physics). Registration was open to graduate students in Physics, Chemistry, 

and Engineering; advanced undergraduate students could also register with the instructor’s permission. 

Approximately 15 students from 5 departments took the course for credit. In addition, several postdocs 

from different departments sat in on the class. This introductory course discusses the basics of physics 

and chemistry of organic and polymer-based electronic and magnetic materials and devices. This includes 

the electronic structure of molecules, polymers and solids, and their relation to electrical conductivity and 

magnetism of conventional metals and materials.

The fourth new course, Molecular Simulation of Materials (Singer/CHEM), is being offered in spring quarter 

2005 to advanced undergraduate students and graduate students. Over twenty students are enrolled in the 

course and additional students are auditing. The course provides an introduction to the use of molecular 

simulations to predict static and dynamic properties of interest to physical scientists and engineers. Because 

students are from a wide variety of backgrounds, little prior knowledge is required other than a working 

knowledge of multivariate calculus and what is taught in introductory undergraduate physics and chemistry 

classes.

The freshman engineering design-and-build course (Tomasko/ChBE) is being revised and expanded. The 

Center is supporting the development of special “nanotechnology” laboratory sections of Engineering 183 

and H193. These courses include quarter long design-build projects based around lab-on-a-chip technology 

that students work on in teams. Engineering 183 is a continuation of a successful pilot from an NUE grant 

to Tomasko last year and the Center is providing logistical and equipment support to scale it up as a full-time 

complement to the regular projects in this course. In academic year 2004-05, we expect an enrollment of 210 

students in the nano sections of 183. Engineering H193 is the honors version of the freshman engineering 

sequence and the Center is providing equipment, supplies, and logistical support to the development of an 

advanced lab-on-a-chip experiment to study cell adhesion on nanostructured surfaces. This course will be 

offered for the first time in Spring quarter 2005 with an enrollment of 30 students. 

IV. Education Activities Outside the University 

Description of Education and Outreach Activities

The major goals of the outreach program are to use the center’s research output to train and increase the 

technical literacy of K-12 students and teachers, members of the industrial workforce, and the general public; 

and to develop international collaborations. Tomasko (faculty) and Stevenson (Education Director) will 

coordinate an integrated, broad collaboration among university faculty and constituency groups as part of 

a Nanotechnology Literacy Initiative. Long-range plans and progress to date are reported below. All center 

faculty, graduate Fellows, and staff will participate in aspects of the education and/or outreach programs. 

Outreach for grades K-12 focuses on the development and delivery of nanotechnology content and ageappropriate materials that promote hands-on learning. Our current primary strategy is to build on existing, 

successful programs in the OSU Colleges of Engineering and Math and Physical Sciences. A series of new 

1-3 hour hands-on training modules will be developed and offered as part of the College of Engineering’s 

on-campus outreach and recruiting activities, starting in summer 2005. These activities include the Women 

in Engineering Summer Workshop; the High School Co-op Program; the Summer Experience; and the Minority 

Engineering Program’s Camp Engineer.
52

A. Outreach to High School Students

Description of Activities

Engineers in Motion, Women in Engineering Summer Workshop (Offered Twice Summer 2005)

Program Staff and Expertise

These programs are managed through the Women in Engineering office in the College of Engineering at 

Ohio State University. NSEC faculty prepared and delivered a 3-hour module for each of these programs. 

Goals and Objectives

Learn about engineering fundamentals and disciplines. Explore engineering through hands-on activities, lab 

tours, and industry visits.

Target audience (educational levels, number of students at each level, etc.)

Engineers in Motion – Students finishing 9th or 10th grade, 35 students

Women in Engineering Summer Workshop – Female students finishing 12th grade and planning to enter 

College of Engineering, 35 students at each of 2 sessions.

Current Activities

The students participate in about 6-7 activities from different disciplines throughout the week. Activities 

include making LED bracelets (Electrical Eng), touring Honda of America in Marysville, DNA Extraction 

(Chemical & Biomolecular Eng.) among many others. NSEC faculty hosted one activity in which the 

students were divided into small groups (4-5 each) and accompanied to various NSEC laboratories where 

they worked on a hands-on activity and reported their work back to the larger group via a short presentation.

Nano S&E Content Focus

Activities included in the NSEC program were as follows: 

Femtosecond pulsed-laser fabrication (Prof. Farson, Welding Eng) – Micro and nanochannel fabrication 

in soft materials. Produced a CD with a channel tracing an image of an eagle.

Liposome preparation and characterization (Prof. Lee, Pharmacy) – Prepared self-assembled liposomes in 

solution.

Atomic Force Microscopy (Prof. Agarwal, Biomed. Eng) – Scanned surfaces and cells attached to those 

surfaces.

Micromachining of Optic Components (Prof. Yi, Industrial Eng) – Explored high-precision machining 

for top-down fabrication approaches.

Biomedical device micro- and nano-fabrication (Prof. Hansford, Biomed Eng) – Suited up and toured 

clean room to see photolithography and other nanofabrication methods.

Ultrasonic micro- and nanoembossing (Prof. Benatar, Welding Eng.) – learned how to use sound waves 

to create and control nanofeatures in soft materials.

Electrospinning of polymer nanofibers (Prof. Lannutti, Materials Science & Eng.) – prepared electrospun 

polymer fibers of a biodegradable polymer for use in tissue engineering applications.

Thermal characterization and analysis (Prof. Ho, Chemical & Biom. Eng) – Students performed TGA 

analysis on biopolymers.

Biochips (Prof. Yang, Chemical & Biom. Eng.) – Students worked with newly designed chips for high 

throughput ELISA.

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
5

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

B. Outreach and Education to Middle School Students.

Description

NSEC Faculty members visit local middle schools and later interact with the same students when they visit 

OSU.

Project Staff

All members of NSEC Education Committee and Other NSEC Faculty

Goals and Objectives

We expect to teach the students a basic understanding of nanoscience and technology and fabrication 

methods (microfabrication and nanofabrication). In addition, we want to interest minority middle-school 

students in science and technology through these efforts.

Current Activities

In March 2005, members of the NSEC Education and Outreach Committee met with the staff of the 

Columbus Public Science Office to begin planning presentations and events for academic year 2005-2006. 

We have designed a nanoscience and technology unit for middle-school students that involves a visit to 

the school from an NSEC faculty member followed by a visit by the middle school student to OSU to do 

experiments and tour the NSEC labs.

In April 2005 Olesik made a presentation to the 8th grade science classes (60 students) of The Wellington 

School in Upper Arlington on Nanoscience and Technology. This presentation including a discussion of 

what the term nano means and how nature has used nanoscience for some time and now scientists and 

technologist are learning how to better understand and engineering nanomaterials. The students were also 

given a general description of what they would be doing during their visit to OSU.

In May 2005, the middle school students did laboratory experiments on micro-fabrication techniques and 

also visited numerous NSEC laboratories, including the operating fabrication lab.

A. Outreach to Middle-School and High School Teachers

Description of Activities

Professional Development Workshops for Middle School and High School Teachers

Program Staff and Expertise

NSEC Education Committee and Selected-NSEC Faculty

Goals and Objectives

Teach about grades 6-12 science teachers basic concepts of nanoscience and technology

Target audience (educational levels, number of students at each level, etc.)

Grades 6-12 science teachers

Current Activities 

As a prelude to this, we showed Grades 3-5 teachers basic concepts on nanotechnology during the OSU 

Science Fellows Supporting Teachers Workshop, SFST (OSU’s GK-12 program), which was held on June 21- 
5

23, 2005. These teachers also visited the NSEC labs. We plan to offer professional development workshops 

Nanoscience and Technology during the winter and spring Professional Workshop Days for the Columbus 

Public School teachers.

V. Education Outreach Materials

Describe and provide examples of materials, outlines, demonstrations, etc. developed for outreach activities 

for the K-12 and/or informal audiences

These were described above and will be illustrated at the conference.

Evaluation

We are in the midst of getting external evaluation of the Outreach Program configured.
55

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

APPENDIX 7: PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY/ CENTER FOR MOLECULAR

NANOFABRICATION AND DEVICES PROFILE

I. Description 

Institution: Penn State University

PI: Th omas Mallouk

Title: Center for Molecular Nanofabrication and Devices

Proposal: 0213623

Program Offi cer: Ulrich Strom

Education Outreach Coordinators: Ronald D. Redwing, rdr10@psu.edu and Joanna M. Skluzacek, 

jms1020@psu.edu

II. Research Agenda

Th e Penn State MRSEC supports collaborative, interdisciplinary research eff orts in the area of nanoscale 

materials. Th e research themes of the Center are focused broadly on molecular nanofabrication, complex 

inorganic materials, and low-dimensional electronic nanostructures. Th ese research themes are integrated 

with major eff orts in educational and industrial outreach. Th e activities of the Center involve over 

fi fty students and postdoctoral fellows, an approximately equal number of faculty from eight academic 

departments at the Penn State University Park Campus and Hershey Medical Center, and a number of 

external academic and industrial partners.

III. Education Activities within the University

Annually our faculty, staff and students off er educational outreach programs reaching approximately 

3,500 K-12 students, 30 K-12 teachers, and 35 undergraduates. Th ese programs provide opportunities for 

students, teachers and anyone with an interest in science to learn about how nanoscience touches our lives 

and how cutting edge research could change our world in the future. Virtually every graduate student, 

post doctoral fellow and faculty member of our MRSEC participates in one or more of our education and 

outreach programs. Th ese programs are designed to communicate the excitement and wonder of science and 

technology with both general and specialized audiences.

Our summer programs for children are designed to increase interest in science and build self-esteem 

in students with special attention in including girls and under-represented minority children. During 

our annual teacher workshop, Center members work with teachers to develop ideas and resources to be 

used in the teachers’ classrooms. Th rough a joint MRSEC/Physics Department Research Experience for 

Undergraduates (REU)/ Research Experience for Teachers (RET) site, we off er research projects that give 

undergraduate students the opportunity to participate in frontier materials research, as well as assisting 

teachers to bring cutting-edge materials research topics into their classrooms.
5

IV. Education Activities outside the University 

Ideas about nanoscience are disseminated to large general public audiences (over 100,000 museum visitors 

annually) through our partnership with The Franklin Science Museum of Philadelphia, PA. This partnership 

has produced our Materials Matter: It’s A Nanoworld After (distributed in 2003) and All Nano-Bio: Zoom in on 

Life! (distributed in 2005) cart-based museum shows. Each of these shows has been distributed to over twenty 

science and children museums nationwide. A development team consisting of Penn State faculty, graduate 

students, and undergraduates worked with museum staff to develop the shows. Development of a third cart 

based museum show began in November 2004 for distribution in 2007.

Materials Matter includes demonstrations and macro-scale models that explore the “micro” mechanisms 

behind the unusual and surprising “macro” behavior of materials such as aerogels, shape-memory alloys, 

polymers, electronic ink, and zeolites. Each demonstration is coupled with a macro-scale model to explain 

the mechanisms and the principles responsible for the novel behavior. In addition to funding the show 

development, we also provided demonstrational materials and supplies to equip a show for one to one and a 

half years at each museum.

Our second cart based museum show highlights processes in the body that occur at the nanoscale as the 

inspiration for nanotechnology research being done in our laboratories. Zoom consists of six hands on 

demonstrations that teach the principles of nanotechnology through processes occurring within our own 

bodies. Demonstrations topics include, scale, DNA self assembly, membranes, biological motors, viruses 

and antibodies, and vision as molecular switches. Included with each copy of the show is a multimedia 

presentation that includes photographs at the nanoscale and computer animations of each process that is 

demonstrated for visitors. 

In addition to the national distribution of the museum show, two copies of the shows reside at Penn State. 

These copies are used by Center faculty and graduate students to present the shows locally. We have presented 

the shows locally over 100 times for classroom visits, visiting school groups, summer camps and workshops.

V. Education Outreach Materials

Description of a recent successful education outreach activity:

In addition to the programs listed above, our MRSEC has teamed with the Action Potential Science 

Experience, an outreach program of the Penn State Eberly College of Science that uses theme based summer 

programs to teach science topics through novel hands on activities. We have developed a nanoscience and 

materials wizard themed summer camp for 4th-8th grade students. (This is the third camp in a series of camps 

based on J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter books.) Our faculty wrote the curriculum for the week long adventure 

titled The Adventure of the Apprentice’s Stone. The innovative curriculum combines art, history, science into 

a weeklong adventure that transports students to the Penn State School of Wizardry. Campers learn about 

materials and nanoscience while trying to unlock the mysteries of the Apprentice’s Stone. Each day of the 

five day program the activities help to reveal a magical message of the day. When combined at the end of 

the week, the daily messages unlock the secret of the Apprentice’s Stone. Activity topics include ferrofluids, 

nitinol, zeolites, lithography, and spectroscopy. The camp has been licensed and, along with the other two 

Potter camps, was presented in the NY Finger Lakes region in the summer of 2005. 
5

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

VI. Education Outreach Evaluation

Our outreach evaluation to date has been largely short term in nature, post experience surveys at the end of 

the program, except for our REU and RET programs, which have used pre-surveys, post-surveys and later 

surveys to track some limited outcomes. Improving the evaluation of our programs is currently a major focus 

of our education outreach efforts.

VII. Lessons Learned

Don’t reinvent the wheel: we like to say that we combine our research expertise with the education expertise 

of existing programs.

Concept of scale is a starting point for all of our education outreach programs.
5
5

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Appendix 8: Princeton University/Center for Complex Materials P

I. Description 

Institution: Princeton University

PI: Richard Register

Co-PIs: none

Title: Princeton Center for Complex Materials

Proposal: 0213706

Program Officer: Thomas Rieker

Education Outreach Director: Daniel Steinberg

II. Education Activities within the University 

Science and Engineering Expo

Description of activities

More than 1000 middle school students come to Princeton University to experience science and engineering 

with faculty members and students who perform cutting edge research. PCCM entirely organizes the 

engineering venue, which had nearly 40 tables of hands-on demonstrations and activities as well as an 

auditorium show representing about 50% of the entire Expo. The Science and Engineering Expo (SEE 

Princeton) has been a tremendous success in reaching 1000’s of middle school students at an age where 

studies show they tend to loose interest in science. This event allows PCCM faculty members and graduate 

students to showcase their science research in a format in which middle school students can interact with the 

scientists and explore for themselves the world of engineering and materials research. 

Program staff and expertise

Director – Pedagogy expert, scientist, recruiter and coach for demonstrators

Assistant – Handles administrative tasks and logistical issues

Goals and objectives

To inspire students at a critical point in their educational careers to appreciate science and possibly pursue 

careers in a scientific field

Target audience (educational levels, number of students at each level, etc.)

1000 NJ middle school (grades 6-8) students/year

Princeton University Materials Academy

Description of activities

Princeton University Materials Academy (P.U.M.A.) is a summer program for high school students that 

specifically targets students from underserved communities and young women. Students spend one to two 

weeks learning about materials science innovations from leading scientists in an intensive course in 2 sessions 

each summer. P.U.M.A. is the only program on campus that is strictly science oriented. This intensive 

program targets truly underprivileged, disadvantaged high school students – the especially those who have a 

good chance of success with the right encouragement –to give them a full immersion in science. 
6

Program staff and expertise

Director – Pedagogy expert, scientist, experience in Education Outreach 

Assistant – Experience in Education Outreach 

Lead teacher – High school teacher experienced in managing classroom

Goals and objectives

Supplement high school science courses; expose students to current scientific research and university 

professors’ expertise; inspire students to pursue science in their college careers and beyond

Target audience (educational levels, number of students at each level, etc.)

High school students, especially underrepresented minorities from Trenton, Princeton, and Lawrenceville, 

NJ, 45 students/year

Current activities

Anticipated outcomes and/or deliverables (student awareness, curriculum materials, classroom 

demonstrations, etc.)

Nano S&E content focus

Materials Mini-Camp for Teachers

Description of activities

PCCM also has several Teacher Training/Education Programs in which k-12 teachers work directly with 

Princeton researchers to enhance the science content of their school-year courses. The Materials Mini-Camp 

for Teachers is a new initiative in our teacher training programs. In partnership with ASM International and 

Rutgers University, PCCM conducts a one-week course in materials science to help integrate the field with 

existing science and math curricula of New Jersey schools. With these programs, PCCM is teaching cutting 

edge science and directly involving faculty and teachers so that teachers understand what research and science 

at Princeton University is about. With this experience, they can relay knowledge and enthusiasm to their 

students.

Program staff and expertise

Director – Pedagogy expert, scientist, experience in Education Outreach 

Assistant – Handles administrative tasks and logistical issues

Lead teachers – ASM trained in Materials Mini-Camp curriculum

Goals and objectives

To provide specific tools and activities for teachers to introduce and integrate materials science into their 

curricula as well as enthuse teachers about science

Target audience (grade levels, number of students at each level, school districts, etc.)

30 NJ, PA, and NY high school teachers/year
6

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Research Experience for Undergraduates

Description of activities

More than 30 undergraduate students are given the opportunity to perform actual research in materials 

science and engineering that compliments the ongoing research projects of Princeton Center for Complex 

Materials scientists. With the experience in the labs, short courses and lectures, the students are able to 

explore topics in materials science and engineering in a hands-on way that better prepares them for careers in 

science and technology.

Program staff and expertise

Director – Pedagogy expert, scientist, experience in Education Outreach 

Assistant – Handles administrative tasks and logistical issues

Goals and objectives

To provide college students from smaller schools or those without research facilities with the opportunity to 

perform research in sophisticated labs alongside acclaimed scientists

Target audience (grade levels, number of students at each level, school districts, etc.)

30 undergraduate students/year from all over the country

Research Experience for Teachers

Description of activities

Like the REU program, the Research Experience for Teachers program provides research experience in 

Princeton labs with Princeton scientists, but it has a more specific objective. The RET program is designed 

to allow three middle school and high school teachers to enrich their science curriculums at the schools 

where they teach. This experience does not only benefit the teachers. Their new enthusiasm and knowledge 

is passed to their students and fellow teachers. These teachers can use what they’ve learned to engage their 

students and provide insight on teaching and teamwork for other struggling teachers in all subject areas. 

Program staff and expertise

Director – Pedagogy expert, scientist, experience in Education Outreach 

Assistant – Handles administrative tasks and logistical issues

Goals and objectives

To provide high school teachers with the opportunity to perform research in sophisticated labs alongside 

acclaimed scientists. To provide real world science experience to teachers that can be applied in their 

curriculum.

Target audience (grade levels, number of students at each level, school districts, etc.)

2-3 NJ and PA high school/middle school teachers/year
6

IV. Education Activities Outside the University 

Science Center Collaborations; Liberty Science Center

Description of activities

PCCM has worked with the Liberty Science Center in a collaboration to supplement the Strange Matter 

Exhibit. The Strange Matter Exhibit is a traveling exhibit to introduce the topic of Materials Science to 

children and families. Liberty Science Center was the exhibit’s first stop in the United States, providing 

Princeton University with a rare opportunity to participate in an award-winning program that makes 

Materials Science fun and educational for children. The Liberty Science Center asked the help of PCCM 

faculty to give a good solid science base for the exhibit. Faculty and students of PCCM volunteered their 

time at the Liberty Science Center performing pre-arranged demonstrations related to materials science. This 

has resulted in a strong partnership between the Liberty Science Center and PCCM. More collaborations on 

materials science related activities are to come.

Program staff and expertise

Director – Pedagogy expert, scientist, experience in Education Outreach 

Assistant – Handles administrative tasks and logistical issues

Goals and objectives

To engage students and their families in materials science, a field new to many of the general public.

Target audience (grade levels, number of students at each level, school districts, etc.)

Tens of thousands of people/year from the Tri-State area as well as tourists

Current activities

Anticipated outcomes and/or deliverables (student awareness, teacher professional development, curriculum 

materials, classroom demonstrations, etc.)

Nano S&E content focus

Nano S & E content consultants

Toll Gate Science Night and other school visits

Description of activities

Toll Gate Science Night is the largest of many school visit programs, which more than 100 parents and 

children attended. 3rd grade teacher Connie Cloonan, very active in elementary science education programs, 

collaborated with Princeton Center for Complex Materials (PCCM) Educational Outreach Director Dr. 

Daniel Steinberg to organize the program. The event is designed to introduce children to new concepts 

in science, engineering and materials science. Dr. Steinberg and Ms. Cloonan train teachers and parents 

to teach kids principles of science and to perform demonstrations of those principles. Toll Gate students 

of all grades learned about density, light refraction, acoustics, photosensitivity, and many other topics in 

science. Often professors such as Paul Chaikin or graduate students will visit schools to conduct hands-on 

demonstrations for students.

Program staff and expertise

Director – Pedagogy expert, scientist, experience in Education Outreach 

Assistant – Handles administrative tasks and logistical issues
K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Goals and objectives

To engage students and their families in science and provide students with the opportunity to ask real 

scientists their questions.

Target audience (grade levels, number of students at each level, school districts, etc.)

Hundreds of students and parents/year in NJ

Current activities

Anticipated outcomes and/or deliverables (student awareness, teacher professional development, curriculum 

materials, classroom demonstrations, etc.)

Nano S&E content focus

Nano S & E content consultants

6

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Appendix 9: Purdue University/Netwo

Computational Nanotechnology Pro

I. Description

Institutions: Purdue University, Northwestern University, Morgan State University, Stanford University, 

University of Florida, University of Illinois, and the University of Texas at El Paso

PI: Mark Lundstrom

Title: NetWork for Computational Nanotechnology

Proposal: 0228390

Program Officer: Lynn Preston

Education Outreach Co-Directors: Michael Melloch, melloch@ecn.purdue.edu and Umberto Ravaioli, 

ravaioli@uiuc.edu

II. Research Agenda

Research Focus: The NCN is comprised of research themes on nanoelectronics, NEMS/nanofluidics, and 

nanobioelectronics – and a cross-cutting computational theme. These research themes cover a broad subset 

of nanoscience while providing the focus and synergy that are essential to success. The key intellectual 

challenge for the NCN is to develop both the engineering science and software tools necessary to understand 

and design nanoscale devices at the atomistic level and to relate atomistic structure to macro-scale system 

performance. The nanobioelectronics theme serves as an intellectual testbed in which the new knowledge 

and software tools developed in the nanoelectronics and NEMS/nanofluidics themes are used to explore 

specific devices for applications in medicine and biology. The NCN requires that each research project 

produce outstanding science, and also i) develop public-domain software, ii) create unique educational 

resources, and iii) play a visible leadership role in its field. Through this process, a growing set of software 

tools, design approaches, and educational resources are being made available to the nanotechnology 

community. To deliver these resources and services to the broader community, the NCN is developing and 

deploying a unique cyberinfrastructure, the nanoHUB. The NCN intends to serve as a model for other 

communities and actively seeks partnerships to expand the scope of its activities beyond its three science 

themes.

NCN Description: The Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) is a multi-university initiative 

that was launched in September 2002 to create a unique, web-based infrastructure to serve researchers, 

educators, and students. NCN research, education, and outreach programs drive the development of its 

infrastructure. The NCN web site, www.nanohub.org, is a “science gateway” that hosts collaborative tools 

and delivers unique educational resources such as online courses, learning modules, lectures, and seminars. 

Its signature service is online simulation, visualization, and high-performance computing. We intend for the 

NCN to be an example of the role that theory and simulation can play in emerging fields of research, of how 

effective simulation can be in education, and of how innovative cyberinfrastructure can serve a community of 

researchers, educators, and students. In the process of this work, we will create a new generation of software 

tools and a web-based infrastructure of services that will become an essential component of the research and 

education enterprise.
III. Education Activities within the University

Description of activities

NCN is collaborating with the National Center for Learning and Teaching in Nanoscale Science and 

Engineering to support the development of teaching modules for grades 7-16. In particular, NCN is 

providing expertise, development and resources for interactive and simulation based material that can be 

integrated in the NCLT modules.

Program staff and expertise

Umberto Ravaioli (NCN investigator at Illinois) is member of the NCLT leadership team and heads the 

educational software development group, including Prof. Richard Braatz (Chemical and Environmental 

Engineering, Illinois) with several graduate students, undergraduate students, and researchers. U. Ravaioli 

has co-directed the educational effort of NCN, including the organization of two Summer Schools on 

nanotechnology themes in 2004 and 2005.

Goals and objectives

The NCLT has a varied set of objectives in the establishment of a methodology to introduce and evaluate 

educational material in nanotechnology in grades 7-16, to promote teachers’ professional development and to 

develop educational curricula for future educators in nanotechnology. The goal of NCN is to interact with 

the NCLT to provide content and interactive software to pursue all of these educational tasks. 

Target audience (educational levels, number of students at each level, etc.)

The primary audience for current development is now at the high school level, but activities will be broadened 

at a second stage to cover middle school as well as college level students. Teachers professional development is 

also a priority for NCLT which can be facilitate by NCN contributions.

Current activities

Development of advanced Java Applets, FLASH animations, graphical user interfaces for simulations, 

educational videogame framework.

Nano S&E content focus

Present focus is on the basic issues of scale and geometry which are fundamental in the understanding of 

any nanoscale phenomena. Simulations developed at NCN will be very valuable to provide compelling and 

practical application to illustrate important science and engineering concepts at all levels. The development 

of the Rappture framework at NCN has in particular the potential to make advanced research simulation 

tools accessible to a wide audience, by making available efficient interactive graphical interfaces. 

IV. Education Activities Outside the University

Description of Activities

The Network for Computational Nanotechnology (NCN) has adopted a new pedagogically sound contentaggregation strategy for the nanoHUB that uses learning modules as the delivery mechanism. Learning 

modules offer an ideal methodology to bundle voiced lectures, PowerPoint presentations, scientific papers, 

and most importantly online simulation tools into a single coherent standard-compliant package. The 

learning modules developed by NCN adopt the Shareable Content Object Reference Model Version 1.2. 

This ensures that nanoHUB content can interoperate with other compliant course management systems 

such as Sakai and WebCT Vista. The learning module development process leverages the discovery work 

on-going within the NCN in an effective manner. Each learning module contains presentations, exercises, 
K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

and examples, designed by NCN scientists working on that particular area. For example, the Introduction 

Molecular Conduction learning module begins with a talk by Dr. Supriyo Datta – a well-known expert in 

this area. The most important characteristic of a learning module is the ability to provide students access 

to serious simulation tools within the context of their learning. The Introduction to Molecular Conduction 

learning module requires students to actively use the MolCToy simulation tool to complete exercises and 

assignments. One other area of learning that the learning module addresses is assessment. By definition, a 

learning module should provide students with measurable learning objectives. The learning modules include a 

quiz that includes appropriate feedback. The next challenge that NCN is tackling is to provide reliable score 

tracking and reporting services. Also, we want to facilitate the measurement of learning impact as part of 

each learning module. To this end, we are now experimenting with the integration of course management 

systems (in our case we are focusing on an open-source system called Sakai) with the nanoHUB. To provide 

better dissemination of the nanoHUB content, we are in the final phases of announcing a partnership with 

MERLOT (http://www.merlot.org) - an online repository for educational content.

Program Staff and Expertise

Drs. Krishna Madhavan and Mike McLennan lead the development of learning modules on the nanoHUB 

under the supervision of the NCN Technical Director Dr. Gerhard Klimeck and Director Dr. Mark 

Lundstrom. The development of all content aspects requires input from NCN PIs engaged in research. To 

this end, the nanoHUB maintains continuous communication with content area experts.

Goals and Objectives

The primary goal of the learning module development effort is to act as the direct conduit of research content 

to educators and learners. Furthermore, we want learners to interact with NCN research content at their own 

pace. Learning modules are ideal for self-paced learning. The allow students to focus on the use of simulation 

tools within the broader context of the topical area they are trying to learn.

Target Audience

Primarily undergraduate, graduate, and expert users. But, learning modules can also be designed to target 

K-12 levels.

V. Education Outreach Materials

Description of Activities

We have developed a museum exhibit entitled, Nanotechnology: The Science of Making Things smaller. The 

exhibit was designed and built by a team of undergraduate students and faculty. The exhibit has several 

components. There are posters at the start of the exhibit to emphasize how nanostructures are built from 

the ground up, and the idea is illustrated by the use of the popular LEGO bricks. Maintaining this LEGO 

theme, there is a scanning probe microscope (SPM) made out of LEGOs that is used to scan LEGO 

landscapes. This LEGO SPM duplicates in many ways the operation of a real scanning probe microscope. 

There are hands on workbenches with activities that illustrate some of the basic principles underlying 

nanotechnology. There are two kiosks that run cartoon animations on various aspects of nanotechnology. 

These animations can be viewed at www.nanohub.org. There is a kiosk that displays rotating renditions of 

nanostructures such as carbon nanotubes, bucky balls, and DNA. There is a wall of nano-art that consists of 

18 framed scanning probe micrographs of actual carbon nanotubes, quantum corrals, atomic surfaces, etc. 

There are models of nanostructures such as carbon nanotubes, bucky balls, and DNA that hang above the 

exhibit. Finally there are take home brochures and bookmarks that provide more information to guide the 

students’ study of Nanotechnology on the web.
The exhibit premiered at the Children’s Museum of Oak Ridge, TN, where it was on view from April 2, 

2005 through May 31, 2005. The next stop for the exhibit is the National Inventors’ Hall of Fame in Akron, 

Ohio, where it will be displayed from November 1, 2005 through August 31, 2006. 

Goals and Objectives

The primary goal of the museum exhibit is to introduce middle school children to the fascinating and rapidly 

changing field of Nanotechnology.

Target Audience

Primarily middle-school children, but all ages should find the exhibit entertaining and educational.
K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Appendix 10: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute/Cen

Directed Assembly of Nanostructures

I. Description 

Institution: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

PI: Professor Richard W. Siegel

Co-PIs: none

Title: Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center (NSEC) for Directed Assembly of Nanostructures

Proposal: 0117792

Program Officer: David L. Nelson

Education Outreach Director: Dr. Linda S. Schadler, schadl@rpi.edu

II. Research Agenda

Research Focus: Our NSEC is addressing the fundamental scientific issues underlying the design and 

synthesis of nanostructured materials, surfaces, assemblies and devices with dramatically improved 

capabilities for many industrial and biomedical applications. Directed assembly is the fundamental gateway 

to the eventual success of nanotechnology. Therefore, our NSEC is focused on discovering and developing 

the means to assemble nanoscale building blocks with unique properties into functional structures under 

well-controlled, intentionally directed conditions.

NSEC Description: Our NSEC integrates research, education, and technology dissemination to serve as a 

leading national and international resource for fundamental knowledge and applications in nanoscale science 

and technology. Serving society, including educational outreach, is a major thrust (Thrust 3) of our NSEC.

III. Education Activities within the University

Description of activities

The Center’s internal educational activities are focused on undergraduate and graduate education in the 

classroom and through research. We teach several courses on the Rensselaer campus and at our partner 

institution, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). More than 75 undergraduates have 

worked in our laboratories. We also teach an on-site short course at Rensselaer through the Chautauqua 

program and host a variety of visiting scholars.

Program staff and expertise

The education and outreach program in the NSEC is supported by a half-time outreach staff member as 

well as part time support from a business manager and an administrative assistant. In addition, over 2/3 of 

the faculty in the Center are involved in either the internal or external educational activities of the Center. 

Numerous students and post docs have participated. 

Goals and objectives

Each program has audience specific goals, however the overall aim is to increase interest in nanoscience and 

prepare students and professionals for successful research and development in this emerging field.
7

Target audience (educational levels, number of students at each level, etc.)

During the past four years our NSEC has engaged more than 23 undergraduate students, 75 graduate 

students, 18 postdoctoral researchers, 50 working professionals, and several visiting scholars.

Current activities

Undergraduate Research: This is an ongoing project with 23 students from RPI and UIUC having worked in 

our laboratories. The research has resulted in 13 publications and presentations. 

Graduate Leadership Course: With NSEC support, The Archer Leadership Center at Rensselaer developed 

a graduate professional leadership series (PLS) open to all graduate students at Rensselaer. This non-credit 

course has been taken by about 60 students in the last 2 years. The course is now open to all Rensselaer 

graduate students and we are getting students from both science and engineering. The course meets once a 

week for 2 hours and includes Meyers-Briggs evaluation, a ropes course, ethics, leadership, team building, 

and several other related topics. Guest speakers from industry as well as Rensselaer administrators (e.g. the 

Dean of Engineering) visit the class and foster discussion.

Chautauqua Course: Between 15 and 20 college professors and industry researchers from around the 

United States have joined us each year for a 2-day NSF Chautauqua short course. The topics include 

nanocomposites, nano-bio interfaces, molecular modeling, and electrical and optical applications of 

nanoscale materials. 

Graduate and Undergraduate Courses: We have developed two undergraduate level courses with significant 

nanotechnology content, and several graduate courses including an “Introduction to Nanotechnology,” 

“Science of Carbon,” and “Biomimetic Materials.” These are well attended and well received. In addition, 

we teach a graduate course in the business school called “Business Implications of Emerging Technologies” 

that has included nanotechnology projects and involvement of Center faculty. 

Nano S&E content focus

The content of the undergraduate research and technical courses has focused on the development of materials 

using nanoscale building blocks as well as the physics, chemistry, and biology involved in the synthesis 

of those building blocks. This requires background information on high surface area materials and often 

includes applications in areas such as sustainable energy and biomaterials. 

IV. Education Activities Outside the University 

Description of activities

Our NSEC conducts a multitude of educational programs that take place outside of Rensselaer and UIUC. 

Several of these programs have been highly successful. “MoleculariumTM: Riding Snowflakes,” a magical, 

musical (digital dome video) adventure into the world of atoms and molecules was created to spark the 

interest of K-5 students in the nanoscale world. The Bouchet Outreach and Achievement in Science and 

Technology (BOAST) program at UIUC stimulates academically at-risk children’s interest in science and 

serves as a national resource for hands-on science and Internet lessons. Nanoscope is a computer simulation 

of a real scanning electron microscope (SEM) that allows students to learn the SEM control interface and 

provides access to libraries of many samples at various levels of magnification. Our PUI program provides the 

means for a diversity of talented undergraduate students to engage in collaborative research at Rensselaer as 

well as their home institutions.
7

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Program staff and expertise

Educational outreach programs are lead, run, and maintained by several research faculty including professors 

Akpalu (RPI), Braun (UIUC), Dordick (RPI), Garde (RPI), Keblinski (RPI), Lewis (UIUC), Nayak (RPI), 

Peters (RPI), Ryu (RPI), Schadler (RPI), Schubert (RPI), Schweizer (UIUC), Siegel (RPI), Shima (RPI), 

Vojack (UIUC), and Wong (UIUC). (A description of these professors is beyond the brief, 3-page scope of 

this document, but can be found at www.nano.rpi.edu) NSEC staff further supports these programs.

Goals and objectives

Our educational outreach programs aim to increase public science literacy, enrich primary and secondary 

school curricula with cutting-edge science, and enable diverse and talented college students to become 

successful scientists and nanotechnologists. 

Target audience (grade levels, number of students at each level, school districts, etc.)

We are improving science literacy though the development of educational programs for people of all ages, 

which provide fundamental information about the emerging field of nanotechnology. We have reached 

hundreds of people so far and are on our way to reaching ever-wider segments of society. During the last 

four years our programs have engaged several hundred families, more than 400 K-12 students, and over 75 

undergraduate students.

Current activities (Examples)

Our Signature Project – the MoleculariumTM (www.molecularium.com): We have taken up the grand 

challenge of improving science literacy by creating the MoleculariumTM The MoleculariumTM is a digital 

dome theater (like a planetarium) presentation but instead of taking the audience on a ride into the stars, 

the Molecularium ship takes the audience on a ride into the world of atoms and molecules. This fantastical 

ship can shrink to molecular sizes and move as fast as the speed of light. The concept is similar to that of the 

movie Fantastic Voyage (1966) or the Magic School Bus, but we have merged advanced scientific computation 

with state-of-the-art digital animation technology providing scientifically correct molecular motion. The 

first Molecularium show, Riding Snowflakes premiered at the Children’s Museum of Science and Technology 

(CMST) in Troy, NY on February 4th. In this musical adventure aimed at K-5, Oxy, Hydra, and Hydro 

manage to navigate the ship (with the help of a computer) through the clouds, where they travel in a 

snowflake, watch it melt, and feel and observe the wind blowing past them. Musical segments emphasize 

the main message that everything is made of atoms and molecules. Children also learn about the three states 

of matter (“solids slow, liquids flow, gas is fast”) and take a ride along a polymer molecule. Carbón (a carbon 

atom), who meets our trio on their brief journey through space, takes them to his favorite place, the Earth (a 

place teeming with life) where he retires to join a polypeptide chain and be part of life itself! These concepts 

are in agreement with typical state science based outcomes for K-5 students, but are taught such that all ages 

will learn. 

Virtual Nanoscope: The virtual nanoscope is at its core a library of scanning electron microscope (SEM) 

images at various magnifications and focus. These images are stored, and accessed on a computer to give the 

impression of using an actual SEM. We have developed a library of 5 samples that can be viewed at several 

magnifications, several levels of contrast and both in focus and out of focus. This has the potential to be an 

extremely powerful teaching tool that we will build on over the next 6 years. 

Primarily Undergraduate Institution (PUI) Partnerships: We have been collaborating for the past 4 years with 

faculty from Morehouse, Mount Holyoke, Spelman, Smith, and Williams colleges to provide a significant 

research opportunity for undergraduates and to provide collaboration between Center faculty and partner 

faculty. Each of these colleges has outstanding undergraduate programs; the group includes two of the 
7

premier HBCUs and three of the premier women’s colleges in the U.S. Through this collaborative effort, we 

have learned a great deal about how to partner with PUIs, completed some good research, and had about 20 

students (16 of them from underrepresented groups in engineering) spend time at the Center.

Nano S&E content focus: This is similar to our internal emphasis, but adjusted to be age appropriate as 

required. 

Nano S&E content consultants: In order to capture the interest of diverse audiences, our NSEC has 

consulted several educational professionals from various areas, such as primary and secondary educators, 

museum curators, and field experts. Projects such as the MoleculariumTM have involved an even broader group 

including animators, composers, musicians, programmers, faculty, staff, students, etc. 

V. Education Outreach Materials

Describe and provide examples of materials, outlines, demonstrations, etc. developed for outreach activities 

for the K-12 and/or informal audiences

The MoleculariumTM is a great example of an educational outreach program in which several materials 

were produced. An animated, musical, digital dome presentation was produced to spark the interest of 

K-5 students. Many state mandated science standards and lessons were addressed. For example, the New 

York State curriculum including the three states of matter, and the understanding that “everything is made 

of atoms and molecules” were clearly reinforced through this show. An educational resource booklet was 

developed for teachers to prepare their students for the show and then reinforce lessons after the show. This 

booklet includes worksheets, hands-on activities, and lesson plans. A website, www.molecularium.com, 

was developed to educate children and is currently being expanded to include games and online activities 

for children. Furthermore, assessment tools were developed to measure the educational success of the 

MoleculariumTM.

Describe a recent successful education outreach activity

Our PUI summer students delivered their final research presentations in early August 2005. At the same 

time, these undergraduates completed academic papers on their topic, one of which was submitted for 

publication. The quality of their research and enthusiasm for participation was better than ever and we look 

forward to next summer.

VI. Education Outreach Evaluation

Summarize outreach evaluation plan

Our programs are assessed via surveys, open discussion, and professional assessment tools. We have used 

these extensively and seriously and have adjusted many of our programs based on the survey results.

Summarize outreach evaluation results

In general we are finding that the students are learning a great deal from our outreach projects and more 

importantly they gain a new enthusiasm for science. The Molecularium shows very specific learning and we 

are continuing to assess the latest version of the show. 
K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

VII. Lessons Learned

List 2-3 lessons learned to share with others embarking on a nano education outreach effort

Hire professionals where appropriate and do not try to be an artist, graphic designer, DVD developer, 

web designer, when there are professionals who can do it better.

When interacting with secondary school educators, don’t tell them what they need to do, ask them what 

they want and can use. It has to be collaborative.

Describe what you might do differently in the future

In the future, I would like to work toward a model in which the centers on campus doing education and 

outreach have a central staff with specific expertise in education and outreach (as several universities have 

done). This staff develops programs and makes the best use of faculty expertise and also supports the faculty’s 

ideas and enthusiasm and directs that enthusiasm to the most effective projects and interactions. A lot of 

faculty time is lost in relearning lessons (such as the best way to interact with HS teachers and students).

♦

♦

7

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Appendix 11: Stanford University/Center for Probing the Nanoscale

I. Description

Institution: Stanford University

PI: Kathryn Moler

Co-PIs: David Goldhaber-Gordon

Title: Center for Probing the Nanoscale (CPN)

Proposal: 0425897

Program Officer: Denise Caldwell

Education Outreach Director: Kyle Cole, kylecole@stanford.edu

II. Research Agenda

Research Focus: The Center for Probing the Nanoscale is developing novel probes that can dramatically 

improve our capability to observe, manipulate, and control nanoscale objects and phenomena. Our 

nanoprobe development encompasses three themes: nanomagnetics; nanoelectronics; and nanomechanics.

NSEC Description

Stanford and IBM founded the Center for Probing the Nanoscale (CPN) to achieve five principal goals:

To develop novel probes that dramatically improve our capability to observe, manipulate, and control 

nanoscale objects and phenomena.

To apply these novel probes to answer fundamental questions in science and to shed light on materials 

issues which have economic importance for industry.

To educate the next generation of scientists and engineers regarding the theory and practice of these 

probes.

To transfer our technology to industry so that other R&D efforts can benefit from our nano-metrology 

groundwork.

To inspire middle school students by training their teachers at a Summer Institute for Middle School 

Teachers. 

III. Education Activities within the University 

In this section we describe only Year 1 Activities that have already been carried out.

Description of activities

‘

Postdoctoral, graduate, and undergraduate education through research. 

Education and research permeate every activity at Stanford University. The development of nanoprobes 

to address fundamental physical questions is exciting, challenging, and multidisciplinary. Nanoprobe 

development attracts postdoctoral, graduate, and undergraduate researchers whose home departments are 

physics, applied physics, chemistry, mechanical engineering, computational sciences, electrical engineering, 

and materials science and engineering. These student researchers gain expertise in modern nanofabrication, 

materials characterization, sensitive measurement techniques, state-of-the-art experimental design, and multiscale modeling, as well as the design, operation, and data interpretation of nanoprobes. 

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
“Advanced Topics in Nanoprobes”

The CPN faculty, led by Mac Beasley, teach a 3-unit course to familiarize graduate students with the 

advanced nanoprobe technology under development. Every week, a different participating investigator teaches 

two lecture classes and a discussion class. They describe the interesting science that motivates them to develop 

their tools, the tools they are developing, the technical issues involved, and the factors limiting progress. This 

course familiarizes all of the Center Fellows with a variety of techniques and motivations. Enrolled students 

additionally present on ideas for advanced nanoprobes: in the first year of the course, these presentations 

frankly outclassed the faculty presentations for creativity and far-sightedness. 

Visitors

The Center for Probing the Nanoscale hosted 1 professor from the National Hispanic University and 2 

teachers from its associated high school, the Latino College Preparatory Academy, to do research and develop 

lesson plans for 8-10 weeks during the summer.

Program staff and expertise

3 IBM Research Staff Members and 17 Stanford faculty, including seed grant recipients, are CPN 

members and participate actively in CPN programs

Associate Director Kyle Cole, Ph.D. Yale Biology, has 5 years of industry experience as a Research 

Manager at Affymetrix. His education background includes teaching at Lake Tahoe Community College 

and the Continuing Studies Program at Stanford, as well as being a College Director of the FreshmanSophomore College. 

Program Manager Laraine Lietz-Lucas has twenty years of experience in administering educational and 

industrial programs at major research universities. 

Goals and objectives

Our year 1 goal was to build a strong base among the CPN faculty and students. Our goal for the next few 

years is to build on this base to broaden our nanoprobe outreach efforts, including a webcast class offered 

through the Stanford Center for Professional Development and including service/outreach in learning for 

CPN-affiliated students.

Target audience (educational levels, number of students at each level, etc.)

The target audience for year 1 consisted of 2 postdocs, 26 graduate students, 2 undergraduate students, 1 

high school student, 2 teachers, and 1 professor from the National Hispanic University.

Current activities: Anticipated outcomes and/or deliverables (student awareness, curriculum materials, 

classroom demonstrations, etc.)

Student awareness: Our students will complete their work here with an impressive combination of technical 

engineering skills, basic scientific understanding, and communication skills. They will be poised to 

contribute to nanoscience and nanotechnology. They will also understand the interaction between science 

and society and will have experience in communicating and engaging both their fellow scientists and the 

public.

Curriculum materials: We post all class materials on a web site. In 04-05, access to this website was restricted 

to CPN members (broadly defined), but in future years we plan to post the materials publicly and we 

anticipate that the website will eventually develop into a seminal resource.

Nano S&E content focus

Nanoprobes to observe, manipulate, and control nanoscale objects and phenomena.

♦

♦

♦
K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

IV. Education Activities Outside the University 

Description of activities

Workshop

The CPN hosted the first annual workshop on Probing the Nanoscale. It had 8 speakers, mostly from 

industry: 21 students presented posters, and the workshop was attended by over 100 people from a broad 

range of backgrounds.

Summer Institute for Middle School Teachers

CPN plans to offer a Summer Institute for Middle School Teachers twice each summer to twenty teachers 

from California (forty teachers total per summer) for 3 units of Continuing Studies Credit. The Institute will 

cover nanoscience, nanotechnology, and their societal implications, as well as delving into details of advanced 

nanoprobes. The Institute will provide ample opportunity for teacher-teacher interaction and curriculum 

development. In designing this institute, we were inspired by the successful institutes for high school science 

teachers run by the NSECs at Cornell and Rice. The ability of the teachers to connect the California State 

Science Standards to exciting CPN research on the imaging of single atoms and nanostructures will inspire 

middle-school students, who are at a critical age for developing interest in science. Although we worked with 

four diverse nearby middle schools to identify teachers to partner in the development of the curriculum for 

the Summer Institute, we were unable to offer the Summer Institute this year due to lack of personnel.

Program staff and expertise

Workshop

The program for the 2005 workshop was designed by Kathryn Moler and David Goldhaber-Gordon. The 

logistics and advertising for the workshop were beautifully executed by Laraine Lietz-Lucas.

Summer Institute for Middle School Teachers

The leader of the Summer Institute in Year 2 will be Dr. Kyle Cole, our new Associate Director. CPN faculty 

and graduate fellows are excited about participating in the workshop with Kyle’s guidance. In addition, 

several local middle school teachers and our expert partners (discussed in the evaluation section) will play key 

roles in the development of the curriculum.

Goals and objectives

Workshop

Our first annual workshop was a celebration of the Center for Probing the Nanoscale as well as a chance for 

industry and members of the public to mix with each other and university researchers.

Summer Institute for Middle School Teachers

The Summer Institute is designed to give teachers the tools that they need to teach effectively and to inspire 

and inform their students.

Target audience (grade levels, number of students at each level, school districts, etc.)

Workshop

Companies represented at the workshop included NanoSig, Applied Materials, KLA-Tencor, Intel, Agilent, 

IBM, SRI International, VLSI Standards Inc, UMech Technologies, and Cascade Microtech Inc. Schools 

and museums included National Hispanic University, Foothill College, Tech Museum of Innovation, UC 

Berkeley, Delta College, Santa Clara University, and UC Santa Cruz.
Summer Institute for Middle School Teachers

Our Summer Institute targets middle school teachers, primarily in California, from a broad range of middle 

schools. By reaching 40 teachers per year, we can ultimately reach tens of thousands of students in grades 

6-8.

Current activities

The teachers will return to their schools with curriculum; practical, explicit lesson plans; and low-cost kits 

to illustrate the action of nanoprobes at a humanly-accessible length-scale. The teachers will also receive 

Stanford Continuing Studies Credit: we will work with each teacher’s district to ensure that the institute 

meets their requirements for the teachers’ professional development.

Nano S&E content focus

Visualizing and manipulating the nanoscale.

Nano S & E content consultants

CPN researchers, both faculty and students; Dr. Marni Goldman, the Education Director for CPIMA (a 

MRSEC); Prof. Maureen Scharberg, Professor of Chemistry and Director of Science Education at San Jose 

State University.

V. Education Outreach Materials

Describe and provide examples of materials, outlines, demonstrations, etc. developed for outreach 

activities for the K-12 and/or informal audiences

We do not yet have K-12/informal outreach materials that are ready for publication.

Describe a recent successful education outreach activity

Ms. Dixie Sinkovitz, a physics and math teacher at the Latino College Preparatory Academy, completed a 

10-week internship at the Stanford University Center for Probing the Nanoscale. On returning to LCPA, she 

delivered an 8-day lesson on the nanoscale to about 60 LCPA high school students. 

VI. Education Outreach Evaluation

Summarize outreach evaluation plan

We plan to construct our outreach evaluation plan in partnership with three experts. Dr. Marni Goldman 

is the Education Director for CPIMA (a MRSEC). Prof. Maureen Scharberg is a Professor of Chemistry and 

Director of Science Education at San Jose State University. Dr. Nora Sabelli is the co-Director of the Center 

for Teaching and Learning at SRI International. These three education experts have been extremely helpful 

in advising our Center since its conception.

Summarize outreach evaluation results

Course and workshop evaluations were quite favorable, but the real impact of our outreach will be 

determined after the efforts have ramped up in the 05-06 year. 
K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

VII. Lessons Learned

List 2-3 lessons learned to share with others embarking on a nano education outreach effort

Graduate students are an awesome resource.

It’s not good to be located in Silicon Valley during one of the world’s most severe housing bubbles when 

recruiting an education director candidate.

Describe what you might do differently in the future

Focus early on the infrastructure needed to create a successful program.

♦

♦

♦

♦
8
8

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Appendix 12: University of California Los Angles/Center 

Scalable & Integrated Nanomanufacturin

I. Description

Institution: University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

PI: Xiang Zhang

Co-PIs: Eli Yablonovitch

Title: Center for Scalable & Integrated Nanomanufacturing (SINAM)

Proposal: 0327077

Program Officer: Cheng Sun

Education Outreach Director: Adrienne Lavine, Director, lavine@seas.ucla.edu and David Martinez, 

martined@seas.ucla.edu

II. Research Agenda

Research Focus: 

IRG 1 will focus on top-down nano-lithography, including the Plasmonic Imaging Lithography and 

Ultramolding Imprint Lithography, aiming toward critical resolution of 1~10nm.

IRG 2 will explore novel hybrid approaches, in combining the top-down and bottom-up technologies to 

achieve massively parallel integration of heterogeneous nanoscale components into higher-order structures 

and devices. 

IRG  will develop system engineering strategies to scale up the technologies developed in IRG 1 and 2, and

in product design and development.

NSEC Description: While exciting nano scientific discoveries stream continually from research laboratories, 

due to the lack of new manufacturing paradigms, scaling to industrial level production still faces critical 

challenges. We envision two main challenges critical to expedite the nano-technology revolution: (1) the 

ability to do lithography below 20 nm, and (2) the ability to fabricate 3D complex nanostructures.

III. Education Activities within the University 

Description of activities 

Nano-Manufacturing Summer Academy (NMSA): The NMSA program is held for an 8-week period in 

the summer. Participants are college and high school students, who engage in full-time research on a topic 

related to nano-manufacturing. 

New Nano-Courses within UCLA Engineering: Five courses were added or augmented amongst SINAM 

institutions for 2004. A new undergraduate course, entitled “Bio-NEMS Lab”, was designed and taught by 

Professors Yong Chen and Jeong-Yeol Yoon of UCLA. 

Program staff and expertise

Adrienne Lavine, Ph.D., Mechanical Engineering Professor, third year as Director of Education & Outreach 

for SINAM. David Martinez, M.S. Operations Research Engineering, first year as Assistant Director of 

Education & Outreach.
8

Goals and objectives

Diversity. Collaboration with programs on our campuses whose objectives are to attract and prepare 

underrepresented students for the next steps in their education. 

Educating SINAM students at our campuses within a supportive, collaborative environment 

that fosters their continuing education and research success within the interdisciplinary context of 

nanomanufacturing.

Target audience (educational levels, number of students at each level, etc.)

High School Level (100), Community College Students(50), Undergraduates(60), Graduate Students(40). 

All engineering majors.

Current activities

Graduate Young Investigator Award: The GYI is an established program which is successful in supporting 

student-initiated research. We will monitor how many projects either generate useful results within one year 

or are incorporated into on-going SINAM research. 

Courses: The number of courses is probably sufficient. We need to make courses available between 

campuses, using either videoconferencing or recorded course lectures.

Nanomanufacturing Summer Academy: The NMSA is an established program which has increased 

participant diversity in the second year. The desired outcomes are: 1) students express satisfaction with the 

research project, mentoring, and academic preparation workshops. 2) Undergraduates go to graduate school, 

high school students go to college in engineering or science. 

CEED Engineer-in-Training Workshop (highschool students) and NSF/CEED STEP-UP Convocation 

(community college and CSU students): These events are coordinated through CEED, the Center for 

Excellence in Engineering and Diversity, and are based on the MESA model, which has been extensively and 

positively assessed for its effectiveness in preparing students for four-year institutions.

Nano S&E content focus

Nanomanufacturing, nanolithography, nanoimprinting, nano-Legos, AFM usage, Nanomanipulator

IV. Education Activities Outside the University 

Description of activities

Inquiry-Based Module Development & Implementation: Collaborations with faculty from NC State, 

UNC-Charlotte, the California NanoSystems Institute (CNSI), and the National Center for Learning & 

Teaching in Nano-scale Science & Engineering (NCLT) have begun in an effort to design inquiry-based 

learning modules revolving around nano-science principles. 

Nano-Manipulator and Haptic Device: SINAM has placed an order for a Nano-Manipulator (nM) and 

haptic device system to be incorporated into inquiry modules, school science assemblies, 1-2 day classroom 

workshops, and the LATTC community college nano-technology course. The nM has the capability to take 

data from an AFM scan of a nano-scale device and create images for students to see. The nM can also be 

connected to a haptic device that will allow students to virtually “feel” the nano-particle as it is displayed in 

the nM image.

♦

♦
K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Joint Collaboration with Los Angeles Trade Technical College: A program is being developed that 

involves a partnership between Los Angeles Trade Tech community college (LATTC) and UCLA SINAM. 

The program involves two stages; with the first stage representing a pilot program to serve as the model to 

expand implementation into the second stage. 

New Nano-Courses: A new full-year graduate course series at UCSD incorporates the courses of “Advanced 

BioPhotonics”, “BioElectronics”, and “BioNanotechnology”. Altogether, the courses had an enrollment 

of sixty students for the entire year. The series, taught by Professor Mike Heller of UCSD, represents an 

interdisciplinary approach where the convergence of science and technology spurs the creation of new 

nanotechnology. 

Graduate Young Investigator (GYI) Program:

This is a proposal competition amongst graduate students within SINAM. Three proposals were awarded 

$30,000 each for a one-year period starting July 1, 2004 and ending June 30, 2005. 

Program staff and expertise

Adrienne Lavine, Ph.D., Mechanical Engineering Professor, third year as Director of Education & Outreach 

for SINAM. David Martinez, M.S. Operations Research Engineering, first year as Assistant Director of 

Education & Outreach.

Goals and objectives

CC Outreach. Reaching out to the community college district and the Los Angeles Unified School 

District, which serve diverse populations. These are opportunities to expose under-served populations to 

nanotechnology concepts and the innovative SINAM research. 

Outreach to grades 7-12. Our goals here are to: 1) Raise awareness of and enthusiasm for

nanoscale concepts among grade school children. 2) Effectively engage students in nanoscience and 

nanotechnology modules that awaken an interest and encourage persistence in science or engineering. 

Target audience (educational levels, number of students at each level, etc.)

High School Level (300), Community College Students(100)

Current activities

LATTC Phase I: Phase I is the offering of a Nanotechnology course at LA TradeTech College in the Fall. 

The course will be taught by Dr. Miguel Moreno with two kinds of input from UCLA faculty – advisory 

input on the curriculum and bringing students into our faculty labs for approximately two lectures. 

Nanomanipulator and Haptic Device/Module Development: We will use the Nanomanipulator in 

three ways. It will be incorporated into the Los Angeles Trade Technical College Nano-technology course 

(on-deck for Fall). It will be used in grades 7-12 classroom visits in “basic” modules; these are modules that 

address basic concepts of nanometer scale, nanoscale science concepts, geometry, and trigonometry. These 

can be developed quickly (for Fall). 

Nano S&E content focus

Nanomanufacturing, nanolithography, nanoimprinting, nano-Legos, AFM usage, Nanomanipulator.

Nano S & E content consultants

UCLA Graduate School of Education, UCLA MESA, USC MESA, high school teachers, Lawrence Hall of 

Science.

♦

♦
V. Education Outreach Materials

Describe and provide examples of materials, outlines, demonstrations, etc. developed for outreach 

activities for the K-12 and/or informal audiences

MESA Engineers-in-Training Workshops: Mathematics, Engineering, Science Achievement (MESA) 

operates out of the CEED office at UCLA. The program focuses its efforts on organizing pre-college 

programs to garner interest for engineering and science amongst K-12 students. This particular event was 

broken up into three hour-long repeat workshops with students from local high schools (Dorsey, Hamilton, 

and Morningside) in attendance. 

CEED Step-Up Convocation: UCLA SINAM volunteered to attend this event to discuss current 

nano-manufacturing research and nano-technology principles with students from Cal State Los Angeles 

and various California community colleges. The event targeted minority serving institutions to promote 

successful transfer to UCLA and stimulate research interest at UCLA in technical disciplines. 

VI. Education Outreach Evaluation

Summarize outreach evaluation plan

Graduate Young Investigator Award: The GYI is an established program which is successful in supporting 

student-initiated research. We will monitor how many projects either generate useful results within one year 

or are incorporated into on-going SINAM research. 

Nanomanufacturing Summer Academy: The desired outcomes are: 1) students express satisfaction with 

the research project, mentoring, and academic preparation workshops. 2) Undergraduates go to graduate 

school, high school students go to college in engineering or science. For #1, we will give a survey. For #2, we 

will track student progress annually.

LATTC Phase I: An evaluation is written into the project proposal to be done collaboratively by SINAM 

and LATTC. This will address the number and diversity of students taking the course, the competence of 

the students in the course material, and their expressed future interest in nanotechnology. 

Summarize outreach evaluation results

In Progress

VII. Lessons Learned

List 2-3 lessons learned to share with others embarking on a nano education outreach effort:

Collaboration is key, especially with limited staff. Hosting joint events or attending outreach events that 

other programs (especially diversity programs) host goes far to promote education and diversity agendas.

There exists an unlimited amount of programs, centers, and offices that have connections to your target 

students...all one needs to do is to find them.

Have a plan, module, or outline before collaboration is sought. This helps to minimize wasted time and 

promotes further collaboration and funding

Describe what you might do differently in the future

Maximize the assistance of graduate students as they can relay their research to students in imaginative 

and interesting ways.

♦

♦

♦

♦
8

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Appendix 13: University of Illinois/Center for Nanoscale ChemicalElectrical-Mechanical Manufacturi

I. Description

Institution: University of Illinois, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering

PI: Dr. Placid M. Ferreira

Co-Pis: Dr. Ilesanmi Adesida, Dr. John Rogers, Dr. Paul Kenis

Title: NSEC: Center for Nanoscale Chemical-Electrical-Mechanical Manufacturing Systems (NanoCEMMS)

Proposal: 032816

Program Officer: Dr. Kevin Lyons

Education Outreach Director: Lizanne Destefano, destefan@uiuc.edu and Ms. Martha R. Atwater, 

atwater@uiuc.edu

II. Research Agenda

Research Focus: The Center’s goal is to develop a reliable, robust and cost-effective nanomanufacturing 

system to make nanostructures from multiple materials.

NSEC Description: Scholars from mechanical, industrial, chemical, biomolecular, electrical, computer 

and materials science engineering collaborate with colleagues in applied physics, chemistry, and molecular 

and cell biology to create a viable manufacturing technology and science base for nanomanufacturing. The 

Center’s research goals are addressed through a coordinated set of 28 research projects organized into four 

research thrust areas: Micro-Nano Toolbit, Nanoscale Sensing, Manufacturing Systems and Applications, 

with Computational Modeling as a cross-cutting activity. The research, commenced in January 2004, 

spans four campuses: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), North Carolina Agriculture 

and Technical State University (NCAT), the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) and Stanford 

University.

III. Education Activities within the University

Description of activities

The Nano-CEMMS education team concentrates in the following areas:

Courses in nanoscience, nanotechnology, and nanomanufacturing for undergraduate and first year 

graduate school courses 

Research Ethics Training for all participants of the Center

Graduate Student Group that serves to enrich the student experience and to promote collaboration 

REU Program where undergraduates from various institutions gain laboratory experience under the 

direction of faculty sponsors and graduate student mentors

Teacher Workshops that are designed to introduce middle and high school science, math, and industrial 

arts teachers to nanomanufacturing research and to facilitate knowledge transfer to their students. 

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
Designated Diversity Recruitment Programs that deliver nanotechnology-related content to 

underrepresented middle and high school students and recruit undergraduate students for graduate 

school

Summer Camp Programs that target audiences of middle and high school students who are interested 

in engineering, math and science.

Evaluation is conducted by College of Education evaluators who submit constant feedback to Center 

programs.

Program staff and expertise

Faculty and students involved with Nano-CEMMS spend 15% of their time participating in the Center’s 

educational outreach activities. The Nano-CEMMS Executive Committee sets priorities for the HRD team. 

To maximize efficiency and output, the team is augmented by professors, teachers (high school and middle 

school), students (graduate, undergraduate, high school) and part-time professionals just as needed to provide 

particular expertise or to execute particular tasks. 

Martha Atwater Education Coordinator 50%

Prof. Devdas Pai and Prof. Cindy 

Waters (NCA&T)

Education Facilitators 

Joseph Muskin (UIUC) Education Facilitator 25% during the school year, 100% 

during summer

Kaamilyah Abdullah-Span (UIUC) Diversity Programs Coordinator 50%

Patrick Grenda (UIUC)

Deborah Bartz (NCA&T)

Education Evaluators 50%

Goals and objectives

Nano-CEMMS targets its internal HRD activities to:

Contribute to the diversity of the Center participants and the scientific community

Promote the professional advancement of B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. students

Educate and transfer knowledge specific to Nano-CEMMS research to visiting secondary and 

community college students and to the Center’s undergraduate and graduate students.

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Target audience

Nano-CEMMS provides a wide range of activities specifically targeting undergraduate students, graduate 

students, middle and high school students, and teachers who come to university programs. The following 

chart shows the numbers of people reached from 9/1/2004 until 9/1/2005.

Graduate students 61

Undergraduate students 16

Middle and high school teachers 54

Middle and high school students 1096

Current activities

Throughout the year, the Center provides programs for schools and community organizations. We are also 

working in the following areas:

Learning Modules – The summer teacher workshops yielded kernels for several new learning modules 

that use common materials to transfer laboratory research concepts into lessons for school students. The 

education team is currently finalizing and piloting the learning modules.

Learning Kits – With a grant from Motorola, Inc., the education team is building learning kits for the 

various Nano-CEMMS learning modules. The kits will include all the materials necessary to teach a 

module to 30 students as well as assessment and evaluation instruments and return postage. NanoCEMMS will advertise the kits through various mailing lists and professional organizations, and teachers 

will order kits through the Center website. 

Nano S&E content focus

Nanomanufacturing

IV. Education Activities Outside the University 

Description of activities

School and Community Presentations inform students and the general public about upcoming 

changes in manufacturing and the societal implications of this change

The Central Illinois Community College Initiative includes faculty and students within the 

university, community colleges, high schools plus state and local government agencies and industries. 

This consortium is planning a training program to prepare a nanomanufacturing workforce for Central 

Illinois.

The Museum Initiative trains and supports educators at the Children’s Discovery Museum in Normal, 

Illinois, who deliver the Nano-CEMMS education modules in their Learning Labs program for school 

students. 

Program staff and expertise

Same as above

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
Goals and objectives

Educate and transfer knowledge specific to Nano-CEMMS research to external secondary and community 

college students, teachers, and community members.

Target audience

Nano-CEMMS conducts external recruitment activities for undergraduate students, training for teachers 

who will deliver Nano-CEMMS education modules, and programs for schools and community groups. The 

following chart shows the numbers of people reached in external programs from 9/1/2004 through 9/1/2005.

Undergraduate students (external 

recruitment)

89

Middle and high school teachers 19

Middle and high school students 482

Current activities

Preparing for external programs

Developing materials specifically targeted for recruitment within the diversity program

Seeking new partnerships with outreach efforts at partner institutions

Nano S&E content focus

Nanomanufacturing

Nano S & E content consultants

Nano-CEMMS faculty and graduate students provide content expertise.

V. Education Outreach Materials

Materials developed for outreach activities for the K-12 and/or informal audiences

The Center’s ability to present effective educational experiences to a variety of audiences with minimal 

staff is directly related to the development of learning modules with clearly identified learning objectives, 

targeted audience types, and timeframes. The modules can be “snapped together” in various configurations 

depending on the particular interests and age ranges of the audience, as well as the time allotted for the 

presentation.

The Nano-CEMMS learning modules include a wide variety of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor 

learning experiences, and all have clearly stated learning objectives that are geared to Illinois and national 

learning standards. Module development is ongoing by education staff and by teachers and secondary 

students who are engaged in workshops and special projects. The modules are used extensively in camp 

and school programs and are modified based on piloting and evaluation. Each learning module contains 

a teacher’s activity guide, a PowerPoint presentation, student handouts, evaluation instruments and lab 

materials. 

Recent successful education outreach activity

♦

♦

♦
K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Two teacher workshops held in July illustrate how the Center teams of faculty, graduate students, 

undergraduates, secondary teachers and high school students collaborate to create curriculum. 

A high school science teacher who had attended a 2004 workshop spent the month of June visiting 

various Nano-CEMMS labs to determine developing technologies that would make effective learning 

modules for high school science classes and working with faculty and students to prepare for the teacher 

workshops.

During teacher workshops in July, middle and high school teachers spent one week learning about the 

Nano-CEMMS technologies from the principle investigators and from graduate students and undergrads 

who conducted research demos and hands-on labs.

The teachers and a high school student spent the second week replicating the experiences using 

inexpensive materials and developing safe procedures that are practical for a middle or high school 

classroom. As a result, the teachers created:

a 3D printing technique using a data projector and PowerPoint slides

a device using PDMS and Puffy Paint that shows laminar flow of dyed alcohol in small channels

a lab to make colloidal gold and silver and to demonstrate that the two colloids can be separated using 

commercially available filters

The Center’s education team will work during the fall semester to finalize these labs for classroom use.

VI. Education Outreach Evaluation

Outreach evaluation plan

The evaluation effort is a collaboration between Nano-CEMMS and the College of Education faculty and 

staff at UIUC and NCA&T. Evaluation is imbedded in all of the Center’s human resource and education 

activities and is keyed to the goals set for each program component. The approach is designed to provide both 

formative and summative feedback regarding program improvement and progress toward goals. Quantitative 

and qualitative data are gathered using direct observation, interviews and surveys.

Summarize outreach evaluation results

Goals for each program were reached.

Graduate Students - Participants took ownership of the Graduate Student Group, identified needs and 

interests they shared, and took steps to meet them. Participants identified connections across research 

areas and gained an understanding of their individual roles within the Center’s research plan.

Undergraduate students - All participants gained hands-on experience in nanoscience/technology, and 

progress was made in reaching underrepresented groups.

Teachers - Participants expanded their knowledge of nanoscience, created modules that were 

incorporated in their classrooms, and continued their involvement with the center during the year by 

participating in curriculum development and piloting.

Middle and High School Students - Participants were exposed to a range of information regarding 

nanotechnology. Participants were exposed to positive modeling regarding diversity in science.

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
9

VII. Lessons Learned

Three lessons learned 

Use existing infrastructures – Nano-CEMMS has formed collaborative relationships with many wellestablished camp programs at UIUC and NCA&T. All have the infrastructures to handle the housing 

and entertainment facets of camp life, allowing Nano-CEMMS to utilize resources efficiently to create 

learning modules for the various camps. 

Modularize learning materials – The Center’s modular approach to curriculum development allows the 

team to respond quickly to requests for presentations.

Hire staff just as needed – Nano-CEMMS has a small part-time staff of secondary teachers and 

undergraduates who work as needed to fulfill its education goals. The staff is augmented when necessary 

by faculty and graduate students who also provide content expertise. This staffing plan maximizes 

efficiency and controls costs. 

What the Center is doing differently in the future

Workshops - Recruiting teachers who serve a higher percentage of underrepresented students

Curriculum - Focusing future development efforts on materials directly related to nanomanufacturing

Internships - Working with industry to provide more internships for students

Collaboration - Identifying opportunities to work with outreach efforts at the Center’s other partner 

institutions

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
9

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Appendix 14: University of Massachusetts Amh

Center for Hierarchical Manufacturing

I. Description

Institution: University of Massachusetts Amherst

PI: Jim Watkins

Co-Pis: Mark Tuominen

Title: NSEC: Center for Hierarchical Manufacturing (CHM)

Proposal: 0531171

Program Officer: Kevin Lyons

Education Outreach Director: Mark Tuominen tuominen@physics.umass.edu and Mort Sternheim, mort@

k12.umass.edu

II. Research Agenda

Research Focus: Basic research is divided into three technical thrusts: nanoscale materials and processes, 

nanoelectronics, and bio-nanotechnology. Testbed projects, carried out with industrial partners, are the 

vehicle used to establish proof-of-concept prototypes in nanomanufacturing. A National Nanomanufacturing 

Network (NNN) is nucleated within the project, in partnership with other NSECs, as a vehicle for 

university-industry collaboration and nanomanufacturing clearing house activities. Societal impact studies 

complement the other activities.

NSEC Description: The CHM is a NSEC with a focus on nanomanufacturing R&D. The center has a 

strong emphasis on catalyzing interactions and activities that lead to integrating nanotechnology into safe 

commercial products.

III. Education Activities within the University 

Description of activities (Note this new NSEC starts in October 2005)

K-12 Teachable Nanoscience summer workshops for science teachers

Undergraduate course Introduction to Nanoscience for science and engineering majors

Summer REU experiences

Video-based learning modules for technical community college (in collaboration with Springfield 

Technical Community College)

Public outreach: Web based nanotechnology "vignettes" that highlight nanoscale science and engineering

(Affiliated) NSF IGERT graduate program on nanotechnology: "Lab to Fab"

Program staff and expertise

Search in progress for our NSEC education and outreach coordinator; Mort Sternheim K-12 education 

coordinator; Gordon Snyder community college education coordinator; others to be named.

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
9

Goals and objectives

Creation of sustainable and updatable curriculum materials for nanoscience education; training experiences 

for students from community college to graduate level.

Target audience (educational levels, number of students at each level, etc.)

Pending

Current activities

Project has not yet started

Nano S&E content focus

Teachable Nanoscience (K-12)

IV. Education Activities Outside the University 

Description of activities

Web-based educational materials development with STCC (see above)

Program staff and expertise

Goals and objectives

Target audience (grade levels, number of students at each level, school districts, etc.)

Current activities

Project has not yet started.

Nano S&E content focus

Nano S & E content consultants

V. Education Outreach Materials

Describe and provide examples of materials, outlines, demonstrations, etc. developed for outreach 

activities for the K-12 and/or informal audiences

One-minute nanotechnology video vignettes for public outreach; delivered via web.

Describe a recent successful education outreach activity

Project has not yet started.

VI. Education Outreach Evaluation

Summarize outreach evaluation plan

Periodic external evaluation by Peterfreund and Associates (or equivalent).

Summarize outreach evaluation results
K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

VII. Lessons Learned

List 2-3 lessons learned to share with others embarking on a nano education outreach effor

Project has not yet started.

Describe what you might do differently in the future

9

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Appendix 15: University of Pennsylvania/NSEC 

I. Description

Institution: University of Pennsylvania

PI: Dawn Bonnell

Co-PI’s: Yale Goldman

Title: Molecular Function at the Nano/Bio Interface

Proposal: 0425780

Program Officer: Ulrich Strom

Education Outreach Director: James McGonigle, jmcgon@seas.upenn.edu

II. Research Agenda

Research Focus: Two multi disciplinary research teams are focused on aspects of the fundamental issues. 

Two cross cutting initiatives develop ideas integral to each and make explicit links between them. The two 

fundamental themes are: (1) optoelectronic function in synthetic biomolecules and (2) mechanical motion 

of molecules from physiological systems. In each area physical interfaces probe, control, or influence the 

outcome. Each theme has a strong fundamental component and obvious technological impact that ranges 

from nanoelectronics to medical diagnostic devices. Intersecting each theme is an initiative on development 

of new probes of molecular/nanostructural behavior. In addition, an overarching activity concerns the ethical 

implications of nanotechnology specific to the research themes and in a broader sense.

NSEC Description: The center’s research is aimed at the interface of nanotechnology and biology at the 

molecular level. Potential practical outcomes are in the areas of nanoscale device manufacturing, drug 

delivery and integrated chemical sensors as well as understanding basic complex biological and physiological 

processes. The center will impact public education, social discourse, workforce development, and diversity, 

both locally and nationally, and will examine ethical issues in nanoscience and technology.

III. Education Activities within the University

One of the important outcomes the NSEC in terms of human resources will be a population of 

undergraduate and graduate students as well as post docs with high quality training in nanotechnology as 

is relates to the important issues at the nano/bio interface. In order to properly prepare students to take 

leadership roles in these areas, new curricula are required for which academic disciplines do not exist. The 

students supported in this NSEC will have access to two new curriculum initiatives in nanotechnology that 

are administered by the center.

The goal of the education activities within the University is to increase the involvement of students in the 

field of nanoscale science. The NBIC supports a number of programs aimed at under gradate and graduate 

students. Undergrads are supported in summer research positions in various labs along with the ability to 

apply a minor in nanotechnology to their degree. Graduate students can add a certificate in nanotechnology 

to their transcripts

Workshops and Seminars. The NBIC will support various workshops and seminars. This year, the Center 

supported the Chemical Biophysics Mini-Symposium on Single Molecule Approaches held on 21 April 2005.
IV. Education Activities outside the University

The goal of education programs designed to extend beyond the University is to reach as wide an audience as 

possible with programs and activities that introduce nanoscale science and its growing impact across society. 

Programs are aimed at high school science and math teachers, pre-college students, and the general public.

Program staff: James McGonigle is the Programs Coordinator for the NBIC for programs within and 

outside the University. He has a MS in Biology and a BS Ed. in Biology and General Sciences. Since 1987, 

he has worked as an education director in various museums and research laboratories where programs were 

focused on teacher professional development. Prior to that, he taught high school biology and environmental 

science.

NanoDay @ Penn is an open-house type event featuring exhibits, demonstrations, a poster session, and 

various talks and seminars. Most of the attendance is made up of University students. This year NanoDay 

is inviting local high schools to tour its labs and participate in the day’s events. Scheduled for 26 October 

2005. 

RET-NANO is a 5-week Research Experience for Teachers run in collaboration with the Drexel University 

Nanotechnology Institute. This summer, 18 teachers from the Philadelphia School District and surrounding 

region participated. The 2005 program ran from 11 July - 12 August.

Professional Development Workshops are develop and presented to individual school faculties or other 

specialized groups. This year, the NBIC provided workshops for science and math faculty at the Marianna 

Bracetti Charter School in North Philadelphia along with a workshop for high school principals from the 

Bronx, New York in collaboration with Penn’s Graduate School of Education. 

High school students from across the country participated in a 3-week nanotechnology summer academy on 

the Penn campus. Two graduate students from the NBIC acted as the primary program staff and instructors. 

Participants toured the microfabrication lab and nanotechnology characterization facility and conducted 

numerous laboratory activities.

V. Education Outreach Materials

The NanoDay @ Penn program scheduled for 26 October will be our first opportunity to develop a variety of 

exhibits or demonstration to explain and interpret nanoscale science in outreach programs.

VI. Education Outreach Evaluation

We have adopted the pre and post survey tool developed for RET programs across the country. We will use 

these evaluation data locally to further develop the program and plan to submit data to the researchers at 

Notre Dame University for the national study of RET programs.
K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

VII. Lessons Learned

It is important to communicate with teachers early and well in advance of their participation in programs 

like an RET. Next year, we will prepare a more specific “nanotech primer” that teachers will be required 

to complete prior to arrival to the program. This way, everyone will have an opportunity to develop a basic 

understanding to nanoscale science and perhaps be better prepared to integrate into the research group with 

whom they will work over the ensuing 5-week period.

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

Appendix 16: University of Wisconsin Madison/NS

I. Description

Institution: University of Wisconsin-Madison

PI: Paul Nealey

Co-PIs: Robert Hamers, Franz Himpsel, Mark Eriksson, Padma Gopalan, Nicholas Abbott, Sam Gellman, 

Shannon Stahl, Sean Palacek, Arun Yethiraj, Juan de Pablo, 

David Schwartz, Michael Graham, Susan Coppersmith, Wendy Crone, Franco Cerrina, 

Clark Miller, Daniel Kleinman, Eric Schatzberg, Karin Ellison, Linda Hogle, Mark Suchman, Sarah 

Pfatteicher, John Moore, Joseph Bisognano, Luke Mawst, Thomas Kuech

Title: Templated Synthesis and Assembly at the Nanoscale

Proposal: 0425880

Program Officer: Thomas P. Rieker

Education Outreach Director: John Moore, jwmoore@chem.wisc.edu

II. Research Agenda

Research Focus: The UW-Madison NSEC has four interdisciplinary research thrusts that explore 

complementary concepts around a central theme of self-assembly at the nanoscale. The thrusts are Thrust 

1: Directed Self-Assembly and Registration of Nanoscale Chemical Architectures; Thrust 2: Templated Chemical 

Synthesis of Sequence Specific Heteropolymeric Nanostructure; Thrust 3: Driven Nano-Fluidic Self Assembly

of Colloids and Macromolecules; and Thrust 4: Research in the Societal Implications of Template Synthesis

and Assembly at the Nanoscale. Multiple cross-Thrust activities and interactions further capitalize on our 

multidisciplinary environment, which is essential for successful completion of our research mission. As 

of April 2005 the entire project has involved 27 faculty from science, engineering, and public policy 

departments, 8 postdocs, 35 graduate students, and 3 undergraduates.

III. Education Activities within the University 

Description of activities

Institute for Chemical Education Chemistry Camp: A week long half day camp for 5th-8th grade 

students. Camp included a nanoscience day with activities developed by NSEC graduate students and 

presentation by NSEC postdoctoral associate. 

Online Nanotechnology Teacher Education Course: The UW-NSEC is developing an online 

continuing education nanotechnology class. The course will be a broad overview of current 

nanotechnology topics with a focus on implementing nanoscience into K-12 classrooms.

Educational Fellowships: The UW-NSEC funds two teachers per summer to join the education 

and outreach staff to aid in the development of nano related educational materials. Teachers serve as 

educational consultants through out the school year to help keep developed materials at grade appropriate 

levels.

Program staff and expertise

Diane Nutbrown: Director of Chemistry Camp. NSEC graduate student and Institute of Chemical 

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
100

Education Outreach Specialist

Janice Hall: Online Nanoscience Course Developer. NSEC graduate student.

Andrew Greenberg: Educational Fellows Supervisor. NSEC Postdoctoral Associate

Goals and objectives

Chemistry Camp: The goals of the chemistry camps are to provide hands on inquiry based science 

experiences for 5th-8th grades students. The camps are developed to excite and teach campers about 

current science topics. 

2 Online Nanotechnology Teacher Education Course: The course aims to provide resources for 

teachers to use in their classroom and clearly show how the topic can relate to current curricula.

Educational Fellowships: The fellowship program strives to provide an exciting and rewarding 

nanoscience professional development experience for K-12 science teachers. 

Target audience (educational levels, number of students at each level, etc.)

Chemistry Camp: Students entering 5th-8th grade. Summer 2005 120 campers.

Online Nanotechnology Teacher Education Course: High School Science Teachers

Educational Fellowships: High School Science Teachers. Summer 2005 two teachers.

Current activities (Deliverables)

Chemistry Camp: Camp curriculum manual to be sold via the Institute for Chemical Education.

Online Nanotechnology Teacher Education Course: Course webpage containing nanoscience 

classroom content and laboratory exercises. 

Educational Fellowships: Three nanoscience based educational kits available for purchase through the 

Institute for Chemical Education, each kit will contain a demonstration and/or lesson based on research 

being conducted in NSEC Thrusts.

Nano S&E content focus

Chemistry Camp: Products of nanotech, Gold nanoparticles, and Nickel nanowires

Online Nanotechnology Teacher Education Course: Broad overview of current nanotopics

Educational Fellowships: Societal impacts, Molecular architecture, Self assembly, and DNA elongation.

IV. Education Activities Outside the University 

Description of activities

SPICE (Students Participating In Chemical Education): NSEC graduate students present nanoscience 

and chemistry demonstrations shows for K-12 classrooms and local community events.

Sciencounters: A collaboration between the Madison area Boys and Girls Clubs and the UW-NSEC to 

provide hands on science activities for underrepresented groups in science and engineering.

Independent Laboratory Access for Blind and Visually Impaired Students (ILAB): A collaboration 

between Penn State, Truman State, The Indiana School of the Blind, and the UW-NSEC to develop, 

test, assess, and market instruments and course materials for blind and visually impaired students 

to work independently in science laboratories. The UW-NSEC is responsible for the assessment and 

adaptation of current nanoscience experiments for use in K-12 classrooms with blind and visually 

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
101

K-12 & Informal Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NSEE) in the U.S.

impaired students.

Today’s Science for Tomorrow’s Scientists (TSTS): A website containing innovative tutorials designed 

to teach current research being conducted within the Department of Chemistry at UW to the K-12 

community. Included are tutorials on NSEC research being conducted in the Department of Chemistry.

Program staff and expertise

Diane Nutbrown: Director SPICE and Sciencounters

Andrew Greenberg: ILAB evaluation and nanoscience adaptations

Caroline Pharr: TSTS developer. NSEC graduate student

Goals and objectives

SPICE: SPICE aims to excite the general public and K-12 community about science and engineering. 

Sciencouters: Sciencounters provides opportunities for underrepresented groups to explore science in a 

fun relaxed atmosphere in the hopes of exciting students to pursue careers in science and engineering.

ILAB: ILAB seeks to raise the expectations of blind and visually impaired high school and college 

students, as well as educators of these students, with the goal of encouraging them to consider careers in 

science, technology, engineering, and mathematics professions.

TSTS: The goals of TSTS are to make young people more aware of cutting edge research in chemistry 

and related sciences. Illustrate why researchers receive funding and how their findings impact people. 

Show that research is done by real people working together in a group environment. Provide an 

interactive way to learn modern chemistry while meeting national science education standards.

Target audience (grade levels, number of students at each level, school districts, etc.)

SPICE: K-12, 2. Sciencouters: Teenagers, 3. ILAB: 9-16, 4. TSTS: Grades 5-12

Current activities (Deliverables)

SPICE: Demonstrations shows.

Sciencouters: None

ILAB: Instrumentation and adapted laboratory exercises.

TSTS: Web based tutorials.

Nano S&E content focus

SPICE: Memory metal and Amorphous metals 

Sciencouters: Memory metal and Amorphous metals

ILAB; To be determined

TSTS: Self assembly

Nano S & E content consultants

High School Teachers, Vin Crespi (Penn State Center for Nanoscale Science), NSEC faculty.

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦
102

V. Education Outreach Materials

Describe and provide examples of materials, outlines, demonstrations, etc. developed for outreach 

activities for the K-12 and/or informal audiences

Chemistry Camp Manual: Camp manual to be published and sold through the Institute of Chemical 

Education

Demonstration Kits: Nanoscience demonstration kits on DNA elongation and Molecular architecture to 

be sold through the Institute for Chemical Education. 

Online Nanotechnology Teacher Education Course: Materials including laboratory activities available via 

course webpages.

TSTS: Web based tutorials and games available for classroom and personal use,

ILAB Lab modifications available for download from project webpage and instrumentation to be sold 

through science educational catalogues.

Describe a recent successful education outreach activity

Chemistry Camp: The summer 2005 chemistry camp which had 120 participants from Madison area 

highlighted inventions from chemistry and nanoscience. Campers spent two hours a day running inquiry 

based laboratory activities including making gold nanoparticles and nickel nanowires.

VI. Education Outreach Evaluation

Summarize outreach evaluation plan

Evaluation of ILAB began in August with data collection of the control group for a study to determine if 

developed instruments help to increase blind and visually impaired students’ attitudes toward science. The 

evaluation plan includes case studies of students using the instruments as compared to a control group doing 

the experiments in the traditional format with sighted helpers. 

UW-NSEC has hired an evaluation consultant to help develop appropriate evaluation plans for other NSEC 

programs. Evaluation will start in the upcoming months on Chemistry Camp and TSTS. 

Summarize outreach evaluation results

No results have been collected to this point all the NSEC programs are in their first year of existence.

VII. Lessons Learned

List 2-3 lessons learned to share with others embarking on a nano education outreach effort

When developing nano education products it is important for the lessons to be at the appropriate 

educational grade level of your target audience. 

Working with programs that have fluid participation, The Boys and Girls Clubs, causes difficulty to 

maintaining continuity of a program.

♦

♦

♦

♦

♦

1.

2.
[Blank Page]
[Blank Page]
 

 

The National Science Foundation promotes and advances scientific progress in the United States 

by competitively awarding grants and cooperative agreements for research and education in the sciences, 

mathematics, and engineering. 

 To get the latest information about program deadlines, to download copies of NSF publications, and to 

access abstracts of awards, visit the NSF Web Site at: 

http://www.nsf.gov

•	 Location: 4201 Wilson Blvd. 

Arlington, VA 22230

•	 For General Information (NSF Information Center): (703) 292-5111

•	 TDD (for the hearing-impaired): 1-800-281-8749

•	 To Order Publications or Forms:

Send an e-mail to: pubs@nsf.gov

or telephone: (703) 292-7827

•	 To Locate NSF Employees: (703) 292-5111
NSF 06-54

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

ARLINGTON, VA 22230

OFFICIAL BUSINESS

RETURN THIS COVER SHEET TO ROOM 

P35 IF YOU DO NOT WISH TO RECEIVE 

THIS MATERIAL , OR IF CHANGE 

ADDRESS IS NEEDED .