alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-122 September 2, 2005

NRC TO RECRUIT AGGRESSIVELY, HIRE 350 NEW EMPLOYEES IN 2006

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will substantially increase its recruiting efforts to hire

approximately 350 new entry-level and experienced employees by the end of next year. This enhanced

recruiting activity is designed to offset expected retirements and to increase staffing levels in

anticipation of potential new reactor license applications in 2007 and 2008. The NRC is particularly

seeking individuals with scientific and engineering skills, such as health physicists and mechanical

engineers.

Maintaining a high quality workforce and strong scientific knowledge base ensures that the

agency will continue to carry out its primary mission of protecting public health and safety, the

environment, and the common defense and security with regard to civilian use of nuclear materials and

nuclear power.

 The NRC will conduct more than 40 recruiting events at colleges and universities over the next

year. “We hope to showcase the NRC and make it the Federal agency of choice for a select group of

highly qualified individuals,” said James F. McDermott, Director of the Office of Human Resources.

The NRC will use novel recruitment strategies to attract talented engineers and scientists.

Recruitment incentives, a special pay scale for scientists and engineers, and comprehensive benefits

make the NRC an attractive place to work. The American University has identified the NRC as one of

the 10 best Federal agencies to work for based on the results of the Office of Personnel Management’s

2004 Federal Human Capital Survey. Programs such as the Student Career Experience Program, the

Nuclear Safety Professional Development Program, and the Graduate Fellowship Program are expected

to continue to attract highly qualified and motivated employees to the agency.

To strengthen the diversity of its workforce, the NRC plans to reach out to specific student

groups, participate in recruitment events focusing on minorities and people with disabilities, and

bolster relationships with Historically Black Colleges and Universities and other schools with high

minority populations. Almost half of the recruiting events scheduled for this fall involve such

specialized organizations.

The recruiting season begins on September 8 with the University of Maryland’s Intern Fair in

College Park, Maryland. NRC employment information and links to the NRCareers job application
system can be found at http://www.nrc.gov/who-we-are/employment.html. For dates and details of

other planned recruitment events, those interested should contact Jim Horn at 301-415-7703 or

JEH2@nrc.gov.

###
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

- 1

- 

### S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

**C O U R T O F A P P E A L S**

THE JAZZ CLUB 2, LLC, and GEORGE BRIKHO,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants, UNPUBLISHED January 9, 2020

v No. 343872 Wayne Circuit Court DETROIT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, LC No. 17

- 015208

- AA

Defendant

- Appellee.

Before: J ANSEN , P .J., and B OONSTRA and L ETICA , JJ.

J ANSEN , P.J

. ( concurring ).
I wholly concur with the majority’s opinion in this matter. The trial court erroneously upheld the City of Detroit Board of Zoning Appeals’ (BZA’s) determination that plaintiffs, the Jazz Club 2, LLC (the Jazz Club) and George Brikho, are ineligible for a medical marijuana caregiver business license.
I write separately only to stress that the trial court rea d into the definition of an outdoor recreation facility a term that does not belong: greenway. As the majority correctly stated, Detroit Zoning Ordinance § 61

- 16

- 144 defines an “outdoor recreation facility” as:
The use of land for the purpose of a golf c ourse; skating rink (ice skating, roller skating, roller blading, skate boarding, and similar activities)[;] park[;] playfield[;] playground[;] parklot[;] parkway[;] playlot[;] swimming pool; and/or tennis court.
Under Detroit Zoning Ordinance § 61

- 3

- 355
, drug

- free zone is any area within a 1,000 radial feet of an outdoor recreation facility , as defined by Detroit Zoning Ordinance § 61

- 16

- 144, and as “identified in the City of Detroit 2017 Recreation Master Plan.” Detroit Zoning Ordinance § 61

- 3

- 353( 4 ). No where in the definition of an “ outdoor recreation facility ” found in Detroit Zoning Ordinance § 61

- 16

- 144 does the word “greenway” appear ; likewise, a greenway is not identified in the City of Detroit’s 2017 Parks and Recreation Improvement Plan (the M aster Plan) as a recreation facility . Thus, i t logically follows that a greenway does not qualify as a drug

- free

zone , and this should end the inquiry

.- 2

- However, the trial court concluded that the BZA properly relied on the Master Plan to determine that Rouge Valley Parkway is a greenway, and part of an active park system. But what the trial court failed to appreciate is that the Master Plan actually designates “parks” and “greenways” as separate spaces, and moreover the Master Plan purposefully does no t address “greenways, trails, and recreation centers maintained by other agencies, organizations, and business[es.]” Finally, the Master Plan, which identifies several, if not all, of the currently

existing parks in the City of Detroit, does not designate Rouge Valley Parkway as a park, an active park system , or a recreation facility

. In my view , the foregoing, on its own, should have precluded the trial court from affirming the BZA’s determination that plaintiffs are ineligible to possess a medical mar ijuana caregiver business license, as they are not located in a drug

- free zone.

/s/ Kathleen Jansen
### §2293a. Reprogramming of funds for projects by Corps of Engineers

None of the funds made available before, on, or after June 15, 2006, in an appropriations Act may be expended to prevent or limit any reprogramming of funds for a project to be carried out by the Corps of Engineers using funds appropriated in any Act making appropriations for energy and water development, based on whether the project was included by the President in the budget transmitted under section 1105(a) of title 31 or is otherwise proposed by the President or considered part of the budget by the Office of Management and Budget, if the project received funds in an Act making appropriations for energy and water development or any other appropriations Act making additional funds available for energy and water development.

(Pub. L. 109–234, title II, §2307, June 15, 2006, 120 Stat. 457.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 03-131 October 9, 2003

NRC ANNOUNCES AVAILABILITY OF APPLICATION FOR

EARLY SITE PERMIT AT NORTH ANNA NUCLEAR PLANT LOCATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is announcing the availability of an application from

Dominion Nuclear North Anna, LLC, for an early site permit for the North Anna nuclear power plant

site, near Mineral, Virginia. Virginia Electric & Power Co., a subsidiary of Dominion Energy, Inc.,

currently operates two nuclear reactors at the site.

In April the NRC held two public meetings in Mineral to discuss the early site permit review

process. If an early site permit were granted, it would allow the site to be used for one or more new

nuclear reactors. The NRC’s early site review permit process allows resolution of issues relating to a

site before a company decides whether to file an application for permission to actually build and

operate a nuclear power plant at that location. The NRC’s formal review will address site safety,

environmental protection, and emergency planning issues. If the agency approves the early site permit

request, Dominion could reference the permit at any time for up to 20 years in an application with the

NRC for approval to begin construction of one or more new reactors.

The North Anna early site permit application is available electronically at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html -- enter ML032731517 as the search term. A

copy of the application is also available for public review at the NRC Public Document Room, located

at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland; telephone: 800/397-4209 or 301/415-4737.

Local residents may view the application at the Louisa County Library, near Mineral.

The NRC staff is currently conducting an initial review of the application to determine whether

it contains enough information for the staff to perform a comprehensive technical review. If the

application has sufficient information, the NRC will formally “docket,” or file, the application and will

announce an opportunity for affected persons to participate in the required hearing. 

###
### §3030. Temporary appointment or advancement of commissioned officers in time of war or national emergency

#### (a) In general

Officers of the Administration shall be subject in like manner and to the same extent as personnel of the Navy to all laws authorizing temporary appointment or advancement of commissioned officers in time of war or national emergency.

#### (b) Limitations

Subsection (a) shall be applied subject to the following limitations:

(1) A commissioned officer in the service of a military department under section 3061 of this title may, upon the recommendation of the Secretary of the military department concerned, be temporarily promoted to a higher rank or grade.

(2) A commissioned officer in the service of the Administration may be temporarily promoted to fill vacancies in ranks and grades caused by the transfer of commissioned officers to the service and jurisdiction of a military department under section 3061 of this title.

(3) Temporary appointments may be made in all grades to which original appointments in the Administration are authorized, except that the number of officers holding temporary appointments may not exceed the number of officers transferred to a military department under section 3061 of this title.

(Pub. L. 107–372, title II, §230, Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3087.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Provisions similar to this section are contained in section 854a–1 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Functions of President under subsec. (b) of this section delegated to Secretary of Commerce by section 1(h)–(j) of Ex. Ord. No. 11023, May 28, 1962, 27 F.R. 5131, as amended, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 3, The President.
#### In the Matter of Max Victor, Respondent, against George de Maziroff et al., Appellants.

Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 69.]
### SUBCHAPTER I—EXPLORATION
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 03-132 October 10, 2003

 NRC REQUESTS LICENSEES TO UPDATE NATIONAL DATABASE 

ON NUCLEAR MATERIAL HOLDINGS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is updating a national database on certain types of nuclear

material and is requesting about 1,100 licensees to reverify the amounts of those materials currently in

their possession.

The effort to update the Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguards System (NMMSS)

stems from a report issued in October 2001 by the Department of Energy’s Office of the Inspector

General, which found that DOE could not fully account for government-owned materials and nuclear

materials loaned or leased to domestic licensees based on information contained in the NMMSS

database. The NRC believes an updated database will be a more useful and reliable tool for monitoring

nuclear material holdings at licensee sites.

The NMMSS is the national database used by the NRC and the DOE to track certain nuclear

materials and other government-owned materials. The database is maintained by a DOE contractor. 

The NRC issued a bulletin (number 2003-04) October 8 notifying licensees about the agency’s

concerns regarding the database and requesting licensees to perform a one-time reporting of the

material in their possession. The bulletin applies to approximately 1,100 licensees, including power

reactors; research reactors; facilities involved in fuel fabrication, uranium enrichment or uranium

conversion; spent fuel storage sites and educational institutions.

Materials covered by the bulletin include natural uranium, depleted uranium or thorium that

were imported from foreign countries and that the United States has agreed to track; uranium enriched

in the isotope U-235; Uranium-233; and plutonium. Licensees are also requested to report their

holdings of government-owned deuterium, tritium, curium, americium, neptunium, californium,

berkelium, or enriched lithium.

Licensees authorized to possess such materials are to report their precise holdings to the

NMMSS by January 6, and preferably sooner. NMMSS staff will then compare that information to

existing records. Any discrepancies that cannot be readily resolved will be referred to the NRC for

further action.
- 2 -

The text of the bulletin is available on the NRC’s web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/gen-comm/bulletins/2003/bl03004.pdf.

###
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of
the undersigned  officers of Tag-It Pacific,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation (the
"Company"),  do hereby  certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company
on Form 10-K for the  fiscal  year  ended  December  31,  2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QK Report") that:

     (1)  the 10-K Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information  contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date:  March 26, 2003                         /S/ COLIN DYNE
                                              --------------------------
                                                 Colin Dyne
                                                 Chief Executive Officer


Date:  March 26, 2003                         /S/ RONDA SALLMEN
                                              --------------------------
                                                 Ronda Sallmen
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
§ 1640.5 TSP core fund information. The TSP or its record keeper will provide to each participant each calendar year information concerning each of the TSP core funds, including: ( a ) A summary description of the type of investments made by the fund, written in a manner that will allow the participant to make an informed decision; and
( b ) The performance history of the type of investments made by the fund, covering the five-year period preceding the date of the evaluation.
[87 FR 31680, May 24, 2022]
### **CHAPTER 63—USING PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS AND GRANT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS**

Sec.
6301.
Purposes.
6302.
Definitions.
6303.
Using procurement contracts.
6304.
Using grant agreements.
6305.
Using cooperative agreements.
6306.
Authority to vest title in tangible personal property for research.
6307.
Interpretative guidelines and exemptions.
6308.
Use of multiple relationships for different parts of jointly financed projects.
6309.
Non-propagation of core-based statistical area delineations.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2022**—Pub. L. 117–219, §5(b), Dec. 5, 2022, 136 Stat. 2273, added item 6309.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San An tonio, Texas** 

April 18, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00889

- CR & 04

- 18

- 00890

- CR

Sergio MARTINEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR10879 & 2015CR0880 Honorable Melisa C. Skinner, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant ’s brief was due March 29 , 2019 , but was not filed. This court notified appellant ’ s counsel

, Jerry Valdez Jr.

, of the deficiency on April 3 , 2019

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(2). Counsel did not respond to our notice and no brief has been filed.

We therefore ORDER Jerry Valdez Jr. to file the appellant ’s brief in this court on or before May 20, 2019

. If the brief is not filed on or before the date ordered

, we will abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether appellant or his counsel has abandoned the appeal. Moreover, if counsel fails to file appellant’s brief or an extension by the date ordered, he may be or dered to appear and show cause why he should not be held in contempt of this court or otherwise sanctioned.

We order the clerk of this court to serve this order on Jerry Valdez Jr. by first class United States mail and by certified mail, return receipt requested, with delivery restricted to addressee only, or give other personal notice of this order with proof of delivery.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 18th day of April, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
### SUBCHAPTER III—PROHIBITIONS AND ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      9
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                         13,522,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>         107,445,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>    29,914,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>         58,769,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>           59,535,000
<LOANS>                        119,895,000
<ALLOWANCE>                    (1,950,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 196,889,000
<DEPOSITS>                     160,751,000
<SHORT-TERM>                   5,325,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>            911,000
<LONG-TERM>                    13,000,000
<COMMON>                       9,459,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    0
<OTHER-SE>                     7,237,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY> 196,889,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                5,348,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>              2,245,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>               0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>               7,593,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>             1,907,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             2,441,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>          5,152,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                  180,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>             53,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                4,092,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                1,340,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>     1,340,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                   988,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  .79
<EPS-DILUTED>                  .79
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                 9.13
<LOANS-NON>                    130,000
<LOANS-PAST>                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>               1,754,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                  2,000
<RECOVERIES>                   18,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>              1,950,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>           1,950,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>        0
        


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-2164

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Kevin L. Kivett, Sr.

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Joplin

 ____________

 Submitted: February 2, 2021

Filed: February 16, 2021

[Unpublished]

____________

Before KELLY, MELLOY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Kivett appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled

guilty to drug offenses. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed

1The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.
a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the imposition

of a role-in-the-offense sentencing enhancement, Kivett’s designation as a career

offender, and the substantive reasonableness of Kivett’s sentence.

After careful review, we discern no clear error in the district court’s imposition

of the role enhancement. See United States v. Camacho, 555 F.3d 695, 705-06 (8th

Cir. 2009) (discussing application of U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1). We decline to address

Kivett’s challenge to his career-offender status, as his United States Sentencing

Guidelines Manual (“Guidelines”) range would have been the same without the

career-offender designation, and we conclude any error was harmless. See United v.

Sykes, 854 F.3d 457, 462 (8th Cir. 2017) (reasoning that any error was harmless

where it did not change the Guidelines calculation).

Finally, we conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively

unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir.

2009) (en banc) (reviewing sentence under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard

and discussing substantive reasonableness); see also United States v. Callaway, 762

F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014) (noting within-Guidelines sentence is presumed

reasonable). Having reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant

counsel leave to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
AQUINO,

10/26/2015

ARMANDO DEJESlSj|

On this day, the application *~-*

and^presented to the Court.

OFFI<£9\^BBM«L STMT,0N AUSTM-T~

STATE OF TEXAS J&&^

PENALTY FOR jKmS? PRIVATE USE jM^$&

^Gg^iTNlEYBOWES

On this day, the application forklirQ^Writ^of tfabeas Corpus has been received

^•sawa*- Abel Acosta, Clerk

ZIP 78701

02 m

0001401682NOV. 03 2015

197

h

ARMANDO DEJESUS AQUINO

2701 W.BELLFORT #210

HOUSTON, TX 77054

7 7 0 5 4 ©5 015

IMETN38 770S4

WR-84,106-01 U

l>l|.,n |(l.II,, ..|.i.||ff,.j^

h