alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1424 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1424

 To extend the possession tax credit with respect to American Samoa an 
                          additional 10 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2003

 Mr. Faleomavaega introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the possession tax credit with respect to American Samoa an 
                          additional 10 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Samoa Possession Tax Credit 
Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) The United States territory of American Samoa lies 
        2,300 miles southwest of Hawaii, covers a land area of 76 
        square miles, has a population of less than 70,000, and a per 
        capita income of $4,300 per year.
            (2) Due to scarcity of land, labor and capital, economic 
        growth and development in American Samoa has been limited.
            (3) In fact, more than 80 percent of American Samoa's 
        economy is dependent either directly or indirectly on two 
        United States tuna canneries which employ more than 5,150 
        people or 74 percent of the workforce.
            (4) A decrease in production or departure of one or both of 
        the two canneries in American Samoa could devastate the local 
        economy resulting in massive layoffs and insurmountable 
        financial difficulties.
            (5) Although wage rates are $0.60 and less per hour in 
        other tuna catching nations and $3.60 per hour in American 
        Samoa, the possession tax credit offered by section 936 of the 
        Internal Revenue Code of 1986 has encouraged both canneries to 
        remain and invest in the Territory.
            (6) Such credit is scheduled to expire in January 2005 and 
        this may likely lead to the departure of one or both canneries.
            (7) To protect American Samoa's present economy and to 
        encourage and foster other investment and development in the 
        Territory, it is necessary to make permanent or extend the 
        possession tax credit with respect to American Samoa an 
        additional ten years.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF POSSESSION TAX CREDIT WITH RESPECT TO AMERICAN 
              SAMOA.

    Subparagraph (A) of section 936(j)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 (relating to special rules for certain possessions) is amended 
by inserting before the period at the end the following: ``(January 1, 
2016, in the case of American Samoa)''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 2418.13 How will the FLRA use administrative wage garnishment to collect an FLRA debt from a debtor's wages? ( a ) The FLRA is authorized to collect debts from a debtor's wages by means of administrative wage garnishment in accordance with the requirements of 31 U.S.C. 3720D and 31 CFR 285.11. This part adopts and incorporates all of the provisions of 31 CFR 285.11 concerning administrative wage garnishment, including the hearing procedures described in 31 CFR 285.11(f). The FLRA may use administrative wage garnishment to collect a delinquent FLRA debt unless the debtor is making timely payments under an agreement to pay the debt in installments (see § 2418.6). At least thirty (30) days before initiating an administrative wage garnishment, the FLRA will send notice to the debtor in accordance with the requirements of § 2418.4 of this part, including the requirements of § 2418.4(a)(10). (For debts outstanding more than ten (10) years on or before June 11, 2009, the FLRA will comply with the additional notification requirements of 31 CFR 285.7(d).) For FLRA debts referred to the Financial Management Service under § 2418.9, the FLRA may authorize the Financial Management Service to send a notice informing the debtor that administrative wage garnishment will be initiated and how the debtor may request a hearing as described in § 2418.4(a)(10). If a debtor makes a timely request for a hearing, administrative wage garnishment will not begin until a hearing is held and a decision is sent to the debtor. See 31 CFR 285.11(f)(4). If a debtor's hearing request is not timely, then the FLRA may suspend collection by administrative wage garnishment in accordance with the provisions of 31 CFR 285.11(f)(5). All travel expenses incurred by the debtor in connection with an in-person hearing will be borne by the debtor. If a hearing is conducted telephonically, all telephonic charges incurred during the hearing will be the responsibility of the agency.
( b ) This section does not apply to Federal salary offset, the process by which the FLRA collects debts from the salaries of Federal employees (see § 2418.12).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2003-16500; Airspace Docket No. 03-ACE-84]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date. 

# SUMMARY:

This document confirms the effective date of the direct final rule which revises Class E airspace at Oskaloosa, IA.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

0901 UTC, April 15, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas  City, MO 64106; telephone (816) 329-2525.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 2, 2003 (68 FR 67358). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such adverse comment, were received with the comment period, the regulation would become effective on April 15, 2004. No adverse comments were received and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective on that date.                

Issued in Kansas City, MO, on January 21, 2004.

Paul J. Sheridan,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.

[FR Doc. 04-2442  Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
narrative legend
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-02-1999
<CASH>                                            1282
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    31744
<ALLOWANCES>                                       197
<INVENTORY>                                      40172
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 76376
<PP&E>                                           35501
<DEPRECIATION>                                   10688
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  134029
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            56371
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       74084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    134029
<SALES>                                          69750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 69750
<CGS>                                            57997
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    57997
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  8627
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2681
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1032
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1649
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1649
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.1

                            TALON INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                                  SUBSIDIARIES




NAME                                                      JURISDICTION OF
----                                                      ORGANIZATION
                                                          ---------------

Tag-It Pacific Limited......................              Hong Kong

Tag-It, Inc.................................              California

Tag-It Pacific (HK) Ltd.....................              British Virgin Islands

Tagit de Mexico, S.A. de C.V................              Mexico

A.G.S. Stationary, Inc......................              California

Talon Zipper (Shenzhen) Company Ltd.                      China

Talon International Pvt. Ltd. ..............              India

A.G.S. Holdings, Inc. ......................              Delaware

A.G.S. Holdings LLC ........................              Delaware

Tag It Pacific LLC..........................              Delaware

PT Talon Indonesia. ........................              Indonesia

Tag It Brands, Inc. ........................              California

Talon Dominicana S.A. ......................              Dominican Republic

Talon International, Inc. ..................              Delaware
#### § 1653.14 Calculating entitlements.

A qualifying legal process can only require the payment of a specified dollar amount from the TSP. Payment pursuant to a qualifying legal process will be calculated in accordance with § 1653.4(a), (d), (f) and (g).
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-05-009 March 14, 2005

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO DISCUSS 2004 PERFORMANCE AT ROBINSON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff are scheduled to meet with Progress Energy officials

March 24, to discuss the NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at the Robinson nuclear

power plant, located near Hartsville, S.C. The period covered is the calendar year 2004.

The 3 p.m. meeting at the Hartsville Public Library is open to public observation. Before the

session ends, NRC staff will be available to answer public questions on the plant’s safety performance,

as well as the agency’s role in ensuring safe operation of the facility.

“Each year the NRC staff rates the performance of the Robinson plant and all of the nation’s

other commercial nuclear power plants,” NRC Region II Administrator William Travers said. “This

meeting gives us a chance to discuss our assessment with the company, with local officials and with

residents near the plant. Our aim is to make this information available to the public and answer any

questions people may have about our oversight.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region II Office to plant officials addresses the performance of the

plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the

NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/rob_2004q4.pdf .

Overall, the Robinson plant operated safely during 2004. The NRC uses color-coded

inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear plant performance. The colors start

with “green” and increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,” commensurate with the safety significance of

the issues involved. Robinson did have one “white” performance indicator during the period, but an

NRC inspection found that the company’s subsequent actions were adequate to address the issue. 

Based on these results and overall performance, Robinson will receive the baseline, or normal, level of

inspections during 2005.

Routine inspections are performed by NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by

inspection specialists from the Region II Office in Atlanta, and the agency’s headquarters in Rockville,

Md. In addition to the baseline inspections in 2005, the NRC plans inspections of the reactor vessel

head replacement and the under-construction spent fuel storage installation.

 Current information for the Robinson plant is available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/ROB2/rob2_chart.html .

 ###
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS



 



Exhibit 10.1


ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC.


RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS


ADOPTED ON NOVEMBER 6, 2002




     RESOLVED, that in connection with adjustments to outstanding options under
this Corporation’s 1995 Long-Term Incentives Plan (the “1995 LTIP”) made
pursuant to resolutions duly adopted by this Board of Directors at a meeting
held on June 6, 2001 in connection with the distribution by this Corporation to
holders of this Corporation’s Common Stock, par value $1 per share (the
“Company Common Stock”), of shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share,
and the associated preferred share purchase rights of Rockwell Collins, Inc., a
Delaware corporation, Section 10(a) of the 1995 LTIP is hereby amended to
reflect that the total number of shares of Company Common Stock which may be
delivered pursuant to the 1995 LTIP shall not exceed 14,697,887.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-60057

Conference Calendar

 

TROY LEE LOTT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MARCUS GORDON, Circuit Court Judge;

GERALD GRIER,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:01-CV-885-WS

--------------------

June 18, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Troy Lee Lott (Mississippi prisoner #K7065) appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his civil rights action under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim. He

argues that Gerald Grier, an investigator for Scott County,

Mississippi, illegally confiscated his money from his income-tax

refunds and prevented him from using that money to hire an

attorney to represent him during his state criminal proceedings. 
No. 02-60057

-2-

Lott also argues that Marcus Gordon, a Scott County circuit court

judge, violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel by denying

him access to his own money to hire an attorney, by denying a

motion for continuance to allow additional time for finding an

attorney, by giving him only one working day to look for an

attorney, and by turning his money over to his appointed public

defender to cover some of the costs of representation.

As the district court correctly noted, Lott’s allegations

concerning the deprivation of his money fail to establish a

due-process violation because Mississippi law provides adequate

post-deprivation remedies. See Nickens v. Melton, 38 F.3d 183,

185 (5th Cir. 1994). Although Lott states that Judge Gordon

deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel, the

district court properly pointed out that Judge Gordon was

entitled to absolute judicial immunity with respect those claims. 

See Krueger v. Reimer, 66 F.3d 75, 77 (5th Cir. 1995).

The district court did not err in dismissing Lott’s

complaint for failure to state a claim. See Bass v. Parkwood

Hosp., 180 F.3d 234, 240 (5th Cir. 1999). Lott’s appeal is

frivolous and is therefore DISMISSED. See Howard v. King, 707

F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The dismissal of

Lott’s complaint for failure to state a claim and the dismissal

of this appeal as frivolous each count as a strike for purposes

of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383,

385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). We caution Lott that once he accumulates
No. 02-60057

-3-

three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil

action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in

any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious

physical injury. See § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED; § 1915(g) WARNING ISSUED.
#### Jean Cochran et al., Appellants, v. James A. Hughes, Respondent.

Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Memorandum: We think the verdict of the jury was against the weight of evidence. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment for defendant for no cause of action in an automobile negligence action.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 14, 2006



By:

/s/ Chris BiedermannChris BiedermannChief Financial Officer
### §59. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 59 was editorially reclassified as section 6317 of this title.
Exhibit 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

Board of Directors
Community First Bancorporation

         We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  into the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-71401) filed by Community First Bancorporation in
connection  with the Community First  Bancorporation  1998 Stock Option Plan and
into the Registration  Statement on Form S-8 (No.  333-66097) filed by Community
First  Bancorporation in connection with the Community First Bancorporation 1989
Stock Option Plan, of our Report dated  February 7, 2002,  included in Community
First Bancorporation's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2001.

                                             s/Donald G. Jones and Company, P.A.


Columbia, South Carolina
March 22, 2002
DOCKET N O.

__________ I N THE COURT OF CRI MI N

AL APPEAL S AT AUS TI N, TEXAS

I N RE: BRAN D ON J AY CARTER,

Re lator

MOTI ON FOR L EAVE TO FI L E P ETI TI ON FOR WRI T OF MAN D AMUS AN D

WRI T OF PROHI BI TI ON

TO THE HON ORABL E COURT OF CRI MI N AL APPEAL S : Brandon J ay Carte r, Re lator, move s this Court to g rant him le ave to file
his Pe tition for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Prohib ition, and s hows :

1. Concomitantly with filing of thi s Motion, Re lator is te nde ring to the Cle rk of the Court his Pe ti t i o n f o r Writ of M andamus and Writ of
Prohib ition. That Pe tition is incorp orate d into t his Motion, b y re fe re nce , for
all inte nts and p urp os e s, as thoug h s e t forth he re i n ve rb atim.

2. Re l ator re p re s e nts that his Pe tition for Writ of Mandamus

p re s ents an is s u e of g re at imp ortance which may b e p arap hras e d as follows :

m a y a j u dg e ig nore a de fe ndant’ s D u e Proce s s rig hts and this Court’ s
p ronounce me nts of law b y re moving ap p ointe d couns e l on a whim, without

1a he aring

.

3
. Re l ator s ug ge s ts that this is s ue is of g re at imp ortance , not only to him, b ut to the criminal juris p rude nce of Te xas . 4. Re l ator the re fore p ray s that this Honorab le Court grant him le ave
to file his Pe tition for Writ of Mandamus and W rit of Prohib ition. Re lator

p ray s for g e ne ral re lie f.
Re s p e ctfully s ub mitte d, /s / D

. Chris He ss e D avid Chris top he r He s s e S

. B. O. T. # 240 490 81 112 We s t 8 th Ave nue , S uite 3 01 Amarillo, Te xas 7910 1 Te l: (8 0 6) 3 50
- 678 5 Fax: (8 06) 3 5 0- 678 6 Chris @ Panhandle CriminalD e fe ns e . Attorne y Attorne y for Re lator, Brandon J ay Carte r Of Couns e l:
L

. T. “Butch” Bradt #0 2 8 4160 0 140 1 5 S outhwe s t Fre e way , S uite 4 S u g ar L and, Te xas 77478 (28 1) 20 1- 0 70 0 Fax: (28 1) 20 1- 120 2 ltb radt@ flas h. ne t Michae l Mowla #240 48 68 0 445 E. FM 13 8 2 #3

- 718 Ce dar Hill, Te xas 75 10 4 (972) 795

- 240 1 Fax: (972) 692- 663 6

2michae l@ mowlalaw. com CERTIF IC

A TE O F SERVIC E
I , the unde rs ig ne d attorne y , in accordance with the Rule 9. 5, T. R. A. P. , ce rtify that a true and corre ct cop y of the fore g oing Pe tition was de live re d t o: Honorab le Thomas R. Culve r, I I I 240 T H J udicial D is t rict Court Fort Be nd County

J us tice Ce nte r 1422 Eug e ne He i mann Circle Courtroom: Room 3 E Richmond, Te xas 77469 Be ck y . Fis he r@ fortb e ndcounty tx. g ov
J ohn F. He ale y , J r. , D is trict Attorne y G ail Kik awa McConne ll, As s ’ t D is trict Attorne y 1422 Eug e ne He i mann Circle Richmond, TX 77469 G ail. McConne ll@ fortb e ndcounty tx. g ov Harris S

. Wood, J r. 70 1 N orth Pos t Oak

Road #425 Hous ton, Te xas 770 24 Fax: (28 1) 5 79- 15 8 6 hwoodatty @ y ahoo. com On May 11, 20 1 5
.

/s / D

. Chris He ss e D

. Chris He s s e

3