alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1567 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1567

  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to deny citizenship at 
  birth to children born in the United States of parents who are not 
                 citizens or permanent resident aliens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 2003

 Mr. Deal of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to deny citizenship at 
  birth to children born in the United States of parents who are not 
                 citizens or permanent resident aliens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Citizenship Reform Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. PURPOSE.

    It is the purpose of this Act to deny automatic citizenship at 
birth to children born in the United States to parents who are not 
citizens or permanent resident aliens.

SEC. 3. CITIZENSHIP AT BIRTH FOR CHILDREN OF NON-CITIZEN, NON-PERMANENT 
              RESIDENT ALIENS.

    (a) In General.--Section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
(8 U.S.C. 1101) is amended by inserting after subsection (c) the 
following new subsection:
    ``(d) For purposes of section 301(a), a person born in the United 
States shall be considered as `subject to the jurisdiction of the 
United States' if--
            ``(1) the child was born in wedlock in the United States to 
        a parent either of whom is (A) a citizen or national of the 
        United States, or (B) an alien who is lawfully admitted for 
        permanent residence and maintains his or her residence (as 
        defined in subsection (a)(33)) in the United States; or
            ``(2) the child was born out of wedlock in the United 
        States to a mother who is (A) a citizen or national of the 
        United States, or (B) an alien who is lawfully admitted for 
        permanent residence and maintains her residence in the United 
        States.
For purposes of this subsection, a child is considered to be `born in 
wedlock' only if both parents are married to each other and parents are 
not considered to be married if such marriage is only a common law 
marriage.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 301 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1401) 
is amended by inserting ``(as defined in section 101(d))'' after 
``subject to the jurisdiction thereof''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to aliens born on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-026 February 10, 2005

 NRC TESTIFIES ON ENERGY POLICY ACT OF 2003

BEFORE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission believes enacting nuclear-related provisions of H.R. 6, the

Energy Policy Act of 2003, would be a significant step forward for the protection of public health and

safety and the common defense and security, a top agency official told the House Committee on Energy

and Commerce today. 

“Some of the provisions in the bill are the most important nuclear security proposals related to

commercial nuclear activities that have been placed before Congress,” said Luis Reyes, the NRC’s

Executive Director for Operations. “This legislation would also assist NRC in evaluating license

applications for new nuclear facilities.”

Reyes went on to outline significant actions the NRC has taken since the 2001 terrorist attacks

to improve security at the facilities it regulates. He described increased physical security at nuclear

power plants requiring, among other measures, stricter site access controls and enhanced mock

adversary force exercises, as well as enhanced communication with the intelligence community and

improved coordination with federal, state and local organizations responsible for protecting the

nation’s critical infrastructure. 

Reyes strongly supported a specific section of H.R. 6 for containing provisions that would

allow the NRC to authorize guards at nuclear power plants to have and use more powerful weapons

against violent attacks, and would criminalize certain activities such as bringing dangerous weapons

into and sabotaging the construction of nuclear facilities. Reyes also pointed out provisions the NRC

considers superfluous because the commission has already addressed them or because the provisions

don’t promise greater security than already achieved. 

“The commission would welcome the prompt enactment of many H.R. 6 provisions that relate

to commercial use of radioactive material since they would assist the NRC in its efforts to further

ensure the adequate protection of public health and safety, and the common defense and security,”

Reyes said. 

The written testimony will be available at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/congress-docs/congress-testimony/2005/ . For additional information on the enhancements

to nuclear safety since 9/11, go to http://www.nrc.gov .

# # #
### §1953. Coast Guard program

The Commandant of the Coast Guard, in consultation with the Interagency Committee, shall—

(1) take actions to reduce violations of and improve implementation of MARPOL Annex V and the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships (33 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.) with respect to the discard of plastics and other garbage from vessels;

(2) take actions to cost-effectively monitor and enforce compliance with MARPOL Annex V and the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships (33 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.), including through cooperation and coordination with other Federal and State enforcement programs;

(3) take actions to improve compliance with requirements under MARPOL Annex V and section 6 of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships (33 U.S.C. 1905) that all United States ports and terminals maintain and monitor the adequacy of receptacles for the disposal of plastics and other garbage, including through promoting voluntary government-industry partnerships;

(4) develop and implement a plan, in coordination with industry and recreational boaters, to improve ship-board waste management, including recordkeeping, and access to waste reception facilities for ship-board waste;

(5) take actions to improve international cooperation to reduce marine debris; and

(6) establish a voluntary reporting program for commercial vessel operators and recreational boaters to report incidents of damage to vessels and disruption of navigation caused by marine debris, and observed violations of laws and regulations relating to the disposal of plastics and other marine debris.

(Pub. L. 109–449, §4, Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3335; Pub. L. 112–213, title VI, §605, Dec. 20, 2012, 126 Stat. 1578.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships, referred to in pars. (1) and (2), is Pub. L. 96–478, Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2297, which is classified principally to chapter 33 (§1901 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1901 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2012—Pub. L. 112–213 struck out subsec. (a) designation and heading "Strategy" and struck out subsecs. (b) and (c) which required reports on the Coast Guard's progress in implementing former subsec. (a) and on the effectiveness of international and national measures to prevent and reduce marine debris and its impact.
#### § 179.309 Additional administrative procedures.

Nothing contained in this chapter is intended to preclude the use of any other administrative remedy which may be available.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GATEWAY,
INC.'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,060,920
<SECURITIES>                                   167,399
<RECEIVABLES>                                  601,136
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,254
<INVENTORY>                                    121,451
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,256,493
<PP&E>                                         914,065
<DEPRECIATION>                                 289,880
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,067,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,455,823
<BONDS>                                          1,973
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,573
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,494,663
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,067,584
<SALES>                                      4,015,520
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,015,520
<CGS>                                        3,143,630
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,143,630
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,564
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 386
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                295,006
<INCOME-TAX>                                   106,202
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            188,804
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   188,804
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.18


</TABLE>
### §2283b. Clarification of mitigation authority

#### (a) In general

The Secretary may carry out measures to improve fish species habitat within the boundaries and downstream of a water resources project constructed by the Secretary that includes a fish hatchery if the Secretary—

(1) has been explicitly authorized to compensate for fish losses associated with the project; and

(2) determines that the measures are—

(A) feasible;

(B) consistent with authorized project purposes and the fish hatchery; and

(C) in the public interest.

#### (b) Cost sharing

#### (1) In general

Subject to paragraph (2), the non-Federal interest shall contribute 35 percent of the total cost of carrying out activities under this section, including the costs relating to the provision or acquisition of required land, easements, rights-of-way, dredged material disposal areas, and relocations.

#### (2) Operation and maintenance

The non-Federal interest shall contribute 100 percent of the costs of operation, maintenance, replacement, repair, and rehabilitation of the measures carried out under this section.

(Pub. L. 113–121, title I, §1028, June 10, 2014, 128 Stat. 1230.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 2 of Pub. L. 113–121, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-36 May 26, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE AT CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of the Calvert Cliffs

Nuclear Power Plant next Thursday to discuss the results of the agency’s latest Plant Performance

Review for the facility. The plant, which is located in Lusby, Md., is operated by Baltimore Gas and

Electric Company.

Issuance of the reviews was announced in NRC news release 00-059 on April 5 -

www.nrc.gov/OPA/gmo/nrarcv/00-059.html . The Plant Performance Review letter can be found on

the agency’s web site at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr/317ppr3.html .

The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, will be held at 1:00 p.m. in the

Education Center at the Calvert Cliffs site, 1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway, in Lusby. At its conclusion,

NRC staff will be available to answer questions from interested observers.

#
Exhibit 31.2

I,
John Carrozza, Chief Financial Officer of PSB Bancorp, Inc., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of PSB Bancorp, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



6.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date:
March 31, 2005

| |  | /s/JOHN CARROZZAJohn Carrozza
Chief Financial Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------

---
§ 1210.12 Discovery. Except as noted in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section, 5 CFR 1201.71 through 1201.75 apply to appeals filed under this part. ( a ) *Initial disclosures.* The parties must make the following initial disclosures prior to the initial status conference. ( 1 ) *Agency.* The agency must provide: ( i ) A copy of all documents in the possession, custody or control of the agency that the agency may use in support of its claims or defenses; and,
( ii ) The name and, if known, address, telephone number and email address for each individual likely to have discoverable information that the agency may use in support of its claims or defenses.
( 2 ) *Appellant.* The appellant must provide: ( i ) A copy of all documents in the possession, custody or control of the appellant that the appellant may use in support of his or her claims or defenses; and,
( ii ) The name and, if known, address, telephone number and email address for each individual likely to have discoverable information that the appellant may use in support of his or her claims or defenses.
( b ) *Time limits.* The time limits set forth in § 1201.73 of this chapter shall not apply to an appeal under this part. The following time limits apply to appeals under this part: ( 1 ) Discovery requests must be served on the opposing party prior to the initial status conference.
( 2 ) Responses to discovery requests must be served on the opposing party no later than 3 days after the initial status conference.
( 3 ) Discovery motions, including motions to compel, must be filed no later than 5 days after the initial status conference.
( c ) *Methods of discovery.* Parties may use one or more of the following methods of discovery provided under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: ( 1 ) Written interrogatories;
( 2 ) Requests for production of documents or things for inspection or copying;
( 3 ) Requests for admissions.
( d ) *Limits on discovery requests.* Absent approval by the administrative judge, discovery is limited as follows: ( 1 ) Interrogatories may not exceed 10 in number, including all discrete subparts;
( 2 ) The parties may not take depositions; and
( 3 ) The parties may engage in only one round of discovery.
( e ) *Administrative judge's discretion to alter discovery procedures.* An administrative judge may alter discovery procedures in order to provide for the expedited review of an appeal filed under this part.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 61 Forsyth Street, SW

 Atlanta, GA, 30303-8931

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov 

No. II-04-021 March 31, 2004

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO HOLD OPEN REGULATORY CONFERENCE

TO DISCUSS SURRY NUCLEAR PLANT OPERATIONS

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold an open Regulatory Conference with

officials of Virginia Electric & Power Company on April 1 in Atlanta to discuss operations at the

company’s Surry nuclear power plant near Surry, Virginia.

Conferees will discuss the preliminary risk significance of NRC inspection findings associated

with a potential fire in the emergency switchgear and relay room. This room houses the electrical

power sources for most of the essential equipment and operating controls that would be needed in a

plant emergency. Company officials requested the conference to discuss their evaluation of the issue’s

safety significance.

The meeting is open to public observation and will begin at 2:00 p.m. in the NRC’s Region II

office in Atlanta, located in the Atlanta Federal Center at 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Suite 24T20.

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear power plants with a colorcoded process which classifies regulatory findings as either green, white, yellow or red, in increasing

order of safety significance. The NRC’s preliminary evaluation determined that the safety significance

of this issue is white, meaning that it is considered to be of low to moderate safety significance.

No decision on determination of the final significance, any apparent violation or any

contemplated enforcement action will be made during the conference. Those decisions will be made

by NRC officials at a later time, and that information will be made available on the NRC’s web site.

Remote public observation of this meeting will be permitted in Room O-03B34 in the NRC’s

White Flint office building at 11555 Rockville Pike in Rockville, MD. Seating may be limited and

will be assigned on a first-come basis. Interested parties should contact the meeting coordinator, Mr.

Steve Monarque, at (301) 415-1544, indicating their intention to attend.

###
### §1443. Protection of interim investments

In order to further the objectives set forth in section 1441 of this title, the Administrator, not more than one year after June 28, 1980—

(1) shall submit to the Congress proposed legislation necessary for the United States to implement a system for the protection of interim investments that has been adopted as part of an international agreement and any resolution relating to such international agreement; or

(2) if a system for the protection of interim investments has not been so adopted, shall report to the Congress on the status of negotiations relating to the establishment of such a system.

(Pub. L. 96–283, title II, §203, June 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 576.)
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-02-029 June 17, 2002

CONTACT: Breck Henderson 

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: Opa4@nrc.gov

NRC TO CONDUCT SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION 

AT COOPER NUCLEAR STATION

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will conduct a three-week, supplemental

inspection of the Cooper Nuclear Station, a nuclear power plant near Brownville, Nebraska, beginning

June 24. The plant is operated by Nebraska Public Power District.

A supplemental inspection is one that is added to the NRC’s normal, or baseline, inspection

program in response to declining regulatory performance. The supplemental inspection at the Cooper

plant will be the most extensive called for under NRC’s inspection program. The purpose of the

inspection is to provide information that the NRC will use to determine the full extent of regulatory

problems at the plant and whether additional agency actions are necessary. 

Declining regulatory performance at Cooper has taken place since October 2000, when the

NRC identified the first of five inspection findings with low to moderate safety significance. Four of

the findings were associated with failures in Cooper’s implementation of their emergency preparedness

program, while the fifth finding involved a compromise of the biennial requalification exam for plant

operators. Notwithstanding these issues, Cooper continues to operate in a manner that adequately

maintains public health and safety.

The inspection will be performed by a 13-member team which will spend a week at the plant

beginning June 24 and another two weeks beginning July 15. Kriss Kennedy, chief of the branch that

oversees Cooper in NRC Region IV, will lead the inspection team. A public meeting, to be announced

separately, will be held the week of August 19 to discuss results, and the final inspection report is

expected to be issued at the end of August.

###
#### § 2429.17 Reconsideration.

After a final decision or order of the Authority has been issued, a party to the proceeding before the Authority who can establish in its moving papers extraordinary circumstances for so doing, may move for reconsideration of such final decision or order. The motion shall be filed within ten (10) days after service of the Authority's decision or order. A motion for reconsideration shall state with particularity the extraordinary circumstances claimed and shall be supported by appropriate citations. The filing and pendency of a motion under this provision shall not operate to stay the effectiveness of the action of the Authority, unless so ordered by the Authority. A motion for reconsideration need not be filed in order to exhaust administrative remedies.

[46 FR 40675, Aug. 11, 1981]