alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RUIZ E. ACOSTA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-2337

[January 18, 2024]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Caroline Cahill 

Shepherd, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2002-CF-014604-AXXX-MB.

Ruiz E. Acosta, Miami, pro se.

No response required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Editorial Note on Part 142
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 142.52 Port-wide and multiple port acceptance of Line Release. ( a ) *Port-wide processing.* If a C-4 Code has been approved by the port director, the C-4 Code may be used at any Line Release site at the port.
( b ) *Multiple port processing.* In order for a C-4 Code approved at one port to be used at another port, the entry filer must submit an application to the port director of the other port. While uniform criteria shall be applied to approving similar shipments for Line Release at all ports, a port director may exercise his discretion to deny Line Release at his port even though a similar shipment may be approved at another port.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                               BRASS EAGLE INC.

                STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                                      December 31,  December 31,
                                                          1997          1996
PRO FORMA BASIC NET INCOME PER SHARE

 
    Net income available to common stockholder          $    3,636    $      882
                                                        ==========    ==========

    Weighted average common shares outstanding           4,860,368     4,623,112

    Theoretical shares issued whose proceeds would
        have been used to pay divisional equity            377,926       419,279
                                                        ----------    ----------

    Pro forma basic weighted average shares
        outstanding                                      5,238,294     5,042,391
                                                        ==========    ==========

    Pro forma basic net income per share                $     0.69    $     0.18
                                                        ----------    ----------
 

DILUTED NET INCOME PER SHARE

     Net income available to common stockholders        $    3,636    $      882
                                                        ==========    ==========

     Pro forma basic weighted average common
         shares outstanding                              5,238,294     5,042,391

     Add dilutive effect of stock options                  431,710       400,931
                                                        ----------    ----------

     Weighted average dilutive common shares
          outstanding                                    5,670,004     5,443,322
                                                        ==========    ==========

             Diluted net income per share               $     0.64    $     0.16
                                                        ==========    ==========
#### Preferred Oil Company, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v. Atco Tank Service, Inc., Appellant-Respondent.

In an action for a judgment to declare the rights of the parties under a lease, particularly with respect to whether the term of the lease was extended by virtue of an automatic renewal clause contained tWpin, defendant landlord appeals from the third decretal paragraph of the judgment, which enjoins it from instituting any proceedings to recover possession of the premises so long as the tenant meets its obligations under the lease, while the facts recited in the opinion remain unchanged and the Emergency Rent Laws are in effect. Plaintiff tenant cross-appeals from the second decretal paragraph of the judgment, which provides that its lease would come to an end on February 29, 1948, and that its possession after that date would be as a statutory tenant under the emergency rent law. On plaintiff’s appeal the judgment, insofar as appealed from, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. On defendant’s appeal, the judgment is modified on the law by striking therefrom the third decretal paragraph and, as so modified, the judgment, insofar as appealed from, is unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to defendant. Sufficient facts were not alleged in the pleadings to permit a determination as to defendant’s rights under the Emergency Rent Laws upon the expiration of plaintiff’s lease. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
## 1995 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit
6-30-1995 

# Unit ed S t at es v E dmond s
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : D ocke t 93-1890

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1995

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1995 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min
. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du

. 

## Re c omme nde d C it a t ion

" U nit e d S t a t e s v E dmond s " (1995). 1995 D e cisio n s . P ape r 104. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1995/104

## UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_______________ NO. 93-1890

_______________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. THEODORE EDMONDS, Appellant

_______________ Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge , BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, McKEE, SAROKIN, and GARTH 298 

## , Circuit Judges .
O R D E R

A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing in banc in the above appeal, it is O R D E R E D that the Clerk of this Court vacate the panel's opinion and judgment entered April 18, 1995 insofar as it relates to No. 93-1890 and list the above case for rehearing in banc at the convenience of the court. By the Court,
\s\ Dolores K. Sloviter Chief Judge

Dated: June 29, l995

298 

## as to panel rehearing only.
#### Clifford Crandall, Respondent, v. Ford Motor Company, Appellant.

AJI concur.
### §196. Cooperative agreements; delegation of authority

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for fiscal year 1992 and each year thereafter, the Secretary of the Interior or his designee is authorized to—

(a) enter into a cooperative agreement or agreements with any State or Indian tribe to share royalty management information, to carry out inspection, auditing, investigation or enforcement (not including the collection of royalties, civil penalties, or other payments) activities in cooperation with the Secretary, except that the Secretary shall not enter into such cooperative agreement with a State with respect to any such activities on Indian lands except with the permission of the Indian tribe involved; and

(b) upon written request of any State, to delegate to the State all or part of the authorities and responsibilities of the Secretary under the authorizing leasing statutes, leases, and regulations promulgated pursuant thereto to conduct audits, investigations, and inspections, except that the Secretary shall not undertake such a delegation with respect to any Indian lands except with permission of the Indian tribe involved,

with respect to any lease authorizing exploration for or development of coal, any other solid mineral, or geothermal steam on any Federal lands or Indian lands within the State or with respect to any lease or portion of a lease subject to section 1337(g) of title 43, on the same terms and conditions as those authorized for oil and gas leases under sections 1732, 1733, 1735, and 1736 of this title and the regulations duly promulgated with respect thereto: Provided further, That section 1734 of this title shall apply to leases authorizing exploration for or development of coal, any other solid mineral, or geothermal steam on any Federal lands, or to any lease or portion of a lease subject to section 1337(g) of title 43: Provided further, That the Secretary shall compensate any State or Indian tribe for those costs which are necessary to carry out activities conducted pursuant to such cooperative agreement or delegation.

(Pub. L. 102–154, title I, Nov. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1001.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which comprises this chapter.
#### § 4.92 Towing.

No vessel other than a vessel documented for the coastwise trade, or which would be entitled to be so documented except for its tonnage (see § 4.80), may tow a vessel other than a vessel in distress between points in the U.S. embraced within the coastwise laws, or for any part of such towing (46 U.S.C. 55111). The penalties for violation of this provision occurring on or before November 2, 2015, are a fine of from $350 to $1,100 against the owner or master of the towing vessel and a further penalty against the towing vessel of $60 per ton of the towed vessel. The penalties for violation of this section occurring after November 2, 2015, are a fine of from $1,132 to $3,558 against the owner or master of the towing vessel and a further penalty against the towing vessel of $193 per ton of the towed vessel (46 U.S.C. 55111, as adjusted by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015).

[CBP Dec. 17-20, 82 FR 57824, Dec. 8, 2017, as amended at 83 FR 13836, Apr. 2, 2018; 84 FR 13510, Apr. 5, 2019; 85 FR 36480, June 17, 2020; 87 FR 1327, Jan. 11, 2022; 88 FR 2184, Jan. 13, 2023; 89 FR 53860, June 28, 2024]
§ 1201.81 Requests for subpoenas. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 72962 , Sept. 9, 2024.
( a ) *Request.* Parties who wish to obtain subpoenas that would require the attendance and testimony of witnesses, or subpoenas that would require the production of documents or other evidence under 5 U.S.C. 1204(b)(2)(A), should file their motions for those subpoenas with the judge. The Board has authority under 5 U.S.C. 1204(b)(2)(A) to issue a subpoena requiring the attendance and testimony of any individual regardless of location and for the production of documentary or other evidence from any place in the United States, any territory or possession of the United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or the District of Columbia. Subpoenas are not ordinarily required to obtain the attendance of Federal employees as witnesses.
( b ) *Form.* Parties requesting subpoenas must file their requests, in writing, with the judge. Each request must identify specifically the books, papers, or testimony desired.
( c ) *Relevance.* The request must be supported by a showing that the evidence sought is directly material to the issues involved in the appeal.
( d ) *Rulings.* Any judge who does not have the authority to issue subpoenas will refer the request to an official with authority to rule on the request, with a recommendation for decision. The official to whom the request is referred will rule on the request promptly. Judges who have the authority to rule on these requests themselves will do so directly.
[54 FR 53504, Dec. 29, 1989, as amended at 70 FR 30608, May 27, 2005; 77 FR 62367, Oct. 12, 2012]
###### Editorial Note on Part 141

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 141.38 Resident corporations.

A power of attorney shall not be required if the person signing Customs documents on behalf of a resident corporation is known to CBP to be the president, vice president, treasurer, or secretary of the corporation. When a power of attorney is required for a resident corporation, it shall be executed by a person duly authorized to do so.

[T.D. 84-93, 49 FR 17754, Apr. 25, 1984]
#### Elmer E. Alexander and Others v. Trent Tile Company.

Motion granted unless appellant complies with terms stated in order. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Rev 0 (9/08) 

## Com **ments i**  **n Response to “**  **Final r**  **ule; r**  **equest for c**  **om ments**  **”**
**Docket: FAA**  **- 20**  **14 -**  **0169 Directorate Identifier**  **2014 -**  **NM -**  **020 -** **AD** Comments have been received in response to : **“ Final rule; requ**  **est for comments,”** Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above. (Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted. Once you have made your determination, please fill in the com menter(s) name(s) and check the appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, if necessary. Then **include your name and**  **the date**  in the spaces provided, and return it to the AD directorate focal. The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we re ceived from: Boeing **(Please check on**  **e**

**)** These comments **have not** been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration or change of this AD. These comments **have** been found to contain information that warrants consideration of additional regulatory

action. 

### (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual **FAA -**  **IR -**  **M -**  **8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.)**

______ Suzanne Lucier

_____ 7/9/14

__ Name: Date:

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.)
**Exhibit 10.15**

   

***EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT***

*Concluded on June 8, 2000 between:*

*CAREY AGRI INTERNATIONAL POLAND Sp. z o. o.**ul. Bokserska 66A**02-690Warszawa*

*hereinafter referred to as the Employer represented by Human Resources Director Mrs.* *MagdalenaPorowska*

*and*

***Mr.*** ***Bill Carey******resident in Warsaw, Jana Pawla II St. 61 / 34***

*§1*

*The Emloyer engages the Employee as President of Management Board.*

*§2*

*The agreement herewith is signed for terminated period of time from June 8, 2000 thru September 24, 2002.*

*§3*

*During the term of this contract, the Employee will be paid in accordance with the basis setout below:*

*1.*      *Monthly remuneration amounts tothe equivalent of 8000 USD gross paid in Polish zlotys,*

*2.*      *The monthly remuneration is counted on the basis of the average monthly NBP exchange rate,*

*§4*

*The Employee will be entitled to annual vacation leave according to the Labor Code regulations.*

*§5*

*All issues not regulated herein shall be determined in accordance with the Polish LaborCode.*

*§6*

*Any modification of this contract must be made in writingunder penalty of nullity.*

*§7*

*The Agreement has been made in two identicalcopies, one for each Party and in two language versions: Polish and English, each of which has equal legal force.*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

***EMPLOYEE - DATE AND SIGNATURE*********

 

 

***EMPLOYER*********

*Statement*

*I declare that I have received a copy of this contract and after acknowledging its substance, I accept the proposed terms ofemployment and remuneration.**Simultaneously, I acknowledge the work regulations presently in force within the firm.**I hereby confirm my undertaking to keep confidential all informationrelating to my Employer and employment and not to convey them to any third party.*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

***EMPLOYEE - DATE AND SIGNATURE*********

 

 

***EMPLOYER*********
Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 89 FR 20832, Mar. 25, 2024.

§ 351.302 Extension of time limits; return of untimely filed or unsolicited material. ( a ) *Introduction.* This section sets forth the procedures for requesting an extension of a time limit. In addition, this section explains that certain untimely filed or unsolicited material will be rejected together with an explanation of the reasons for the rejection of such material.
( b ) *Extension of time limits.* Unless expressly precluded by statute, the Secretary may, for good cause, extend any time limit established by this part.
( c ) *Requests for extension of specific time limit.* Before the applicable time limit established under this part expires, a party may request an extension pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section. An untimely filed extension request will not be considered unless the party demonstrates that an extraordinary circumstance exists. The request must be in writing, in a separate, stand-alone submission, filed consistent with § 351.303, and state the reasons for the request. An extension granted to a party must be approved in writing. ( 1 ) An extension request will be considered untimely if it is received after the applicable time limit expires or as otherwise specified by the Secretary.
( 2 ) An extraordinary circumstance is an unexpected event that: ( i ) Could not have been prevented if reasonable measures had been taken, and
( ii ) Precludes a party or its representative from timely filing an extension request through all reasonable means.
( d ) *Rejection of untimely filed or unsolicited material.* ( 1 ) Unless the Secretary extends a time limit under paragraph (b) of this section, the Secretary will not consider or retain in the official record of the proceeding: ( i ) Untimely filed factual information, written argument, or other material that the Secretary rejects, except as provided under § 351.104(a)(2); or
( ii ) Unsolicited questionnaire responses, except as provided under § 351.204(d)(2).
( 2 ) The Secretary will reject such information, argument, or other material, or unsolicited questionnaire response with, to the extent practicable, written notice stating the reasons for rejection.
[62 FR 27379, May 19, 1997, as amended at 76 FR 39275, July 6, 2011; 78 FR 57795, Sept. 20, 2013]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

          - 26 CFR Part 25 
          - [REG-163679-02] 
          - RIN 1545-BB72 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed rulemaking. 

# SUMMARY:

This document provides notice of cancellation of a public hearing on proposed rulemaking relating to the gift tax special valuation rules. 

# DATES:

The public hearing originally scheduled for Thursday, October 28, 2004, at 10 a.m. is cancelled. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Guy R. Traynor, Procedures and Administration, Publications & Regulations Branch, at (202) 622-3693 (not a toll-free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Monday, July 26,                           ( print page 62632)                        2004 (69 FR 44476), announced that a public hearing was scheduled for October 28, 2004 at 10 a.m., in the auditorium of the Internal Revenue Service building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The subject of the public hearing is proposed regulations under section 2702 of the Internal Revenue Code. The public comment period for these proposed regulations expired on October 25, 2004.                 

The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing, instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to submit a request to speak and an outline of topics to be addressed by October 7, 2004. As of October 25, 2004, no one has requested to speak. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for October 28, 2004 is cancelled. 

Guy R. Traynor, 

Federal Register Liaison, Publications & Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedures & Administration). 

[FR Doc. 04-24129 Filed 10-25-04; 2:01 pm] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
§ 1639.7 Initial notice to debtor. ( a ) When the Executive Director determines that a debt is owed the Board, he will send a written notice to the debtor. The notice will inform the debtor of the following: ( 1 ) The amount, nature, and basis of the debt;
( 2 ) That payment is due immediately after receipt of the notice;
( 3 ) That the debt is considered delinquent if it is not paid within 30 days of the date the notice is mailed or hand-delivered;
( 4 ) That interest charges (except for State and local governments and Indian tribes), penalty charges, and admini strative costs may be assessed against a delinquent debt;
( 5 ) Any rights available to the debtor to dispute the validity of the debt or to have recovery of the debt waived (citing the available review or waiver authority, the conditions for review or waiver, and the effects of the review or waiver request on the collection of the debt); and
( 6 ) The address, telephone number, and name of the Board official available to discuss the debt.
( b ) The Board will respond promptly to communications from the debtor.
( c ) Subsequent demand letters also will notify the debtor of any interest, penalty, or administrative costs which have been assessed and will advise the debtor that the debt may be referred to a credit reporting agency (see § 1639.5), a collection agency (see § 1639.6), the Department of Justice (see § 1639.10), or the Department of the Treasury (see § 1639.11), if it is not paid.
### §553. Duties of Secretary; surveys, research, etc.; projects

The Secretary of the Interior, in order to effectuate the policy declared in section 551 of this title, is hereby authorized—

(a) to conduct surveys, investigations, and research relating to the causes and extent of outcrop and underground fires in coal formations and the methods for control or extinguishment of such fires; to publish the results of any such surveys, investigations, and researches; and to disseminate information concerning such method; and

(b) to plan and execute projects for control or extinguishment of fires in coal formations.

(Aug. 31, 1954, ch. 1156, §3, 68 Stat. 1009.)