alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 191.106 Amount of drawback. ( a ) *Claim filed with TTB.* If the declaration required by § 191.103 shows that a claim has been or will be filed with TTB for domestic drawback, drawback under section 313(d) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(d)), will be limited to the difference between the amount of tax paid and the amount of domestic drawback claimed.
( b ) *Claim not filed with TTB.* If the declaration and verified statement required by § 191.103 show that no claim has been or will be filed by the manufacturer with TTB for domestic drawback, the drawback will be the full amount of the tax on the alcohol used. Drawback under this provision may not be granted absent receipt from TTB of a copy of TTB Form 5100.4 (Certificate of Tax-Paid Alcohol) indicating that taxes have been paid on the exported product for which drawback is claimed.
( c ) *No deduction of 1 percent.* No deduction of 1 percent will be made in drawback claims under section 313(d) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(d)).
( d ) *Payment.* The drawback due will be paid in accordance with § 191.81(f).
[USCBP-2018-0029, 83 FR 65067, Dec. 18, 2018]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-118 October 3, 2002

NRC ANNOUNCES A WORKSHOP ON LICENSE RENEWAL 

GUIDANCE DEVELOPMENT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will conduct a workshop on October 22 and 23 to obtain

stakeholder comment on implementation of the license renewal rule and associated guidance

documents. 

The two-day workshop will be held from 9 a.m. until 4 p.m. on October 22, and from 9 a.m.

until 12 noon on October 23, in NRC’s Auditorium, located at Two White Flint North, 11545 Rockville

Pike, Rockville, Maryland. Day one will focus on the license renewal application format and content,

and staff’s process in developing interim guidance to review and evaluate license renewal applications. 

Day two will focus on environmental review issues. The workshop will provide participants with the

opportunity to obtain information, ask questions, and make comments and suggestions for NRC

consideration. 

The guidance documents are available for public inspection and duplication at NRC’s Public

Document Room by calling 301-415-4737 or 1-800-397-4209, and at the NRC’s web site at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/guidance.html. For more information about

the guidance documents and upcoming workshop, contact Raj Anand at 301-415-1146, or by email at

rka@nrc.gov.

###
#### Sol C. Spiegel et al., Respondents, v. Marvin M. Marcus, Appellant.

Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 1088.]
Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Commercial Clothes Washers Final Rule Analysis Spreadsheets

Search Help More Search Options

EERE Information Center
Programs and Offices Printable Version



## Commercial Clothes Washers Final Rule Analysis Spreadsheets

This page presents analytical spreadsheets that provide rulemaking findings and interactive tools for the life-cycle cost analysis, national impact analysis, government regulatory impact model, and regulatory impact analysis for commercial clothes washers. Instructions for using the life-cycle cost analysis and national impact analysis spreadsheets can be found in the final

rule technical support document

.

● Life-Cycle Cost Analysis ( Excel 520 KB )

● National Impact Analysis ( Excel 1 MB )

● Government Regulatory Impact Model ( Excel 1 MB )

● Regulatory Impact Analysis ( Excel 2 MB )



### Contact Information
Stephen Witkowski, P.E.
Project Manager

202-586-7463

Printable Version

Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy

Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov

Content Last Updated: 01/04/2010

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/clothes_washers_ecs_final_rule_analysis_tools.html (1 of 2) [1/22/2010 4:11:47 PM]Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Commercial Clothes Washers Final Rule Analysis Spreadsheets

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/clothes_washers_ecs_final_rule_analysis_tools.html (2 of 2) [1/22/2010 4:11:47 PM]
§ 207.114 Initial determination. ( a ) *Time for filing of initial determination.* ( 1 ) Except as may otherwise be ordered by the Commission, within ninety (90) days of the date of issuance of the charging letter, the administrative law judge shall certify the record to the Commission and shall file with the Commission an initial determination as to whether each charged party has committed a prohibited act, and as to appropriate sanctions.
( 2 ) The administrative law judge may request the Commission to extend the time period for issuance of the initial determination for good cause shown.
( b ) *Contents of the initial determination.* The initial determination shall include the following: ( 1 ) An opinion making all necessary findings of fact and conclusions of law and the reasons therefor, and
( 2 ) A statement that the initial determination shall become the determination of the Commission unless a party files a petition for review of the determination pursuant to § 207.115 or the Commission pursuant to § 207.116 of this subpart, orders on its own motion a review of the initial determination or certain issues therein.
( c ) *Burden of proof.* A finding that a charged party committed a prohibited act shall be supported by clear and convincing evidence.
( d ) *Effect of initial determination.* The initial determination shall become the determination of the Commission forty-five (45) days after the date of service of the initial determination, unless the Commission within such time orders review of the initial determination or certain issues therein pursuant to § 207.115 or § 207.116 of this subpart or by order shall have changed the effective date of the initial determination. In the event an initial determination becomes the determination of the Commission, the parties shall be notified thereof by the Commission Secretary.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 03-158 December 4, 2003

NRC SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON PROPOSED RULE CHANGES TO 

SPECIALTY MEDICAL BOARD CERTIFICATION CRITERIA

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is requesting public comment on proposed changes to

criteria used by the NRC and Agreement States to recognize certifications conferred by professional

specialty boards on applicants for various medical radiation safety positions.

In a proposed rule to be published shortly in the Federal Register, the NRC lists several

proposed changes to 10 CFR Part 35, “Medical Use of Byproduct Material,” based upon

recommendations by the NRC’s Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes (ACMUI). The

proposed rule should make the process of recognizing boards by the NRC or Agreement States more

efficient. (Thirty-three states have reached agreements with the NRC to regulate the medical and

industrial uses of byproduct material.)

These proposed changes to the certification criteria, developed by the NRC and Agreement

States in close consultation with the ACMUI, would continue to ensure the safe use of radioactive

material by medical licensees while removing prescriptive requirements for recognition of board

certifications. The proposed rule would provide the boards more latitude in making the determination

that an individual is fully trained and capable of performing duties related to radiation safety. The

revised requirements would include a degree from an accredited college or university, professional

experience, passing an examination conducted by the specialty board, and specialized training. The

specific degree level and amount of training and experience required would vary depending on the

position.

A public comment period will remain open for 75 days following publication of the proposed

rule in the Federal Register. Comments may be submitted by post to Secretary, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff;

by fax to (301) 415-1101; or by electronic mail to SECY@nrc.gov. Comments may also be submitted

online via the NRC’s rulemaking web site at http://ruleforum.llnl.gov . All comments should include

“RIN 3150-AH19" in the subject line.

###
#### § 1501.9 Cases reviewable by the Board.

All cases in which an investigation has been made under Executive Order 10422, as amended, shall be referred to and reviewed by the Board in accordance with the Executive Order and the rules and regulations of the Board.
IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0137

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

GRANT WEST,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER 

Upon consideration of Defendant and Appellant’s Motion For Extension Of 

Time, and with good cause shown, Defendant and Appellant Grant West is hereby 

granted an extension of time until October 4, 2024 in which to prepare, file and 

serve Defendant and Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 22 2024

08/22/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0137
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                         635,295
<SECURITIES>                                   115,690
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,595,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,860,521
<INVENTORY>                                 32,818,073
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,203,266
<PP&E>                                      25,638,378
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,491,527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              68,620,716
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       54,494,770
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       560,441
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,892,397)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                68,620,716
<SALES>                                     81,929,457
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            81,929,457
<CGS>                                       62,982,095
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               62,982,095
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            19,953,305
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               595,770
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             916,493
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,469,806)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,469,806)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
        

</TABLE>
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-03-061 October 7, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC SENDS SPECIAL INSPECTION TEAM TO GINNA NUCLEAR PLANT

TO REVIEW CONTAINMENT SUMP ISSUE 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has sent a team of inspectors to the R.E. Ginna

nuclear power plant to review a degraded containment sump condition. The plant, located in

Ontario, N.Y., is operated by Rochester Gas & Electric (RGE) Company.

 The containment sump would, under certain accident conditions, be used to collect

water released from the reactor coolant system and pump it back into the reactor vessel. Earlier

this year, NRC sent a letter to operators of pressurized water reactors asking them, among other

things, to confirm that their containment sump systems comply with NRC regulations. On

September 18, RGE informed the NRC that while performing an inspection in response to the

bulletin, it found a potential flow path into the containment sump that bypasses screening

designed to prevent foreign materials from getting into and potentially clogging the sump.

 The three-member special inspection will determine the facts, conditions, circumstances

and causes of the containment sump issue. The inspection will focus on assessing Ginna’s

performance related to the degraded condition, including immediate corrective actions.

 A report detailing the findings will be issued within 45 days of the end of the

inspection.

###
§ 190.184 Merchandise transferred from continuous CBP custody. ( a ) *Procedure for filing claims.* The procedure described in subpart O of this part will be followed as applicable, for drawback on merchandise transferred to a foreign trade zone from continuous CBP custody.
( b ) *Drawback entry.* Before the transfer of merchandise from continuous CBP custody to a foreign trade zone, the importer or a person designated in writing by the importer for that purpose must file with the drawback office a direct export drawback entry. CBP will notify the zone operator at the zone.
( c ) *Certification by zone operator.* After the merchandise has been received in the zone, the zone operator must certify the receipt of the merchandise (*see* paragraph (d)(2) of this section) and notify the transferor or the person designated by the transferor. After executing the declaration provided for in paragraph (d)(3) of this section, the transferor must resubmit the drawback entry to the drawback office in place of the bill of lading required by § 190.156.
( d ) *Modification of drawback entry* — ( 1 ) *Indication of transfer.* The drawback entry must include a certification to indicate that the merchandise is to be transferred to a foreign trade zone.
( 2 ) *Endorsement.* The transferor or person designated by the transferor and the foreign trade zone operator must certify transfer to the foreign trade zone, with respect to the drawback entry, as follows: Certification by Foreign Trade Zone Operator The merchandise described in the entry was received from ________ on ________, 20____ in Foreign Trade Zone No. ____, (City and State) Exceptions (Name and title) By (Name of operator)
( 3 ) *Transferor's declaration.* The transferor must declare, with respect to the drawback entry, as follows:
Transferor's Declaration I, ________ ________, of the firm of ________, declare that the merchandise described in this entry was duly entered at the customhouse on arrival at this port; that the duties thereon have been paid as specified in this entry; and that it was transferred to Foreign Trade Zone No. ____, located at ____, (City and State) for the sole purpose of exportation, destruction, or storage, not to be removed from the foreign trade zone for domestic consumption. I further declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief, this merchandise is in the same quantity, quality, value, and package, unavoidable wastage and damage excepted, as it was at the time of importation; that no allowance nor reduction of duties has been made for damage or other cause except as specified in this entry; and that no part of the duties paid has been refunded by drawback or otherwise. Dated: Transferor
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7296

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CURTIS SATTERWHITE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CR-92-146, CA-98-574-3)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 3, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Satterwhite, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying as untimely his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998).We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Satterwhite, No. CR-92-146; CA98-574-3 (E.D. Va. May 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.2

CONSENT, AGREEMENT AND AFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY.

Each of the undersigned Guarantors hereby consents to the terms of the foregoing Amendment and agrees that the terms of the Amendment shall not affect in any way its obligations and liabilities under any Loan Document
(as such Loan Documents are amended or otherwise expressly modified by the Amendment), all of which obligations and liabilities shall remain in full force and effect and each of which is hereby reaffirmed (as amended or otherwise expressly modified
by the Amendment). The Guarantors hereby confirm that the security interests and Liens granted pursuant to the Loan Documents continue to secure the Obligations including the Local Credit Facility Obligations and that such security interests and
Liens remain in full force and effect.



ALLTRISTA NEWCO CORPORATION ALLTRISTA PLASTICS CORPORATION BICYCLE HOLDING,
INC. HEARTHMARK, LLC JARDEN ACQUISITION I, INC. JARDEN ZINC PRODUCTS,
INC. LEHIGH CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION LOEW-CORNELL, INC. QUOIN, LLC THE UNITED STATES PLAYING CARD
COMPANY JARDEN DIRECT, INC. USPC HOLDING, INC. AMERICAN HOUSEHOLD,
INC. AUSTRALIAN COLEMAN, INC. BRK BRANDS, INC. CC OUTLET, INC. COLEMAN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LLC COLEMAN WORLDWIDE CORPORATION FIRST ALERT,
INC. FIRST ALERT HOLDINGS, INC. KANSAS ACQUISITION CORP. LASER ACQUISITION CORP. L.A. SERVICES, INC. NIPPON COLEMAN, INC. SI II,
INC. SUNBEAM AMERICAS HOLDINGS, LLC SUNBEAM PRODUCTS, INC. THE COLEMAN
COMPANY, INC. HOLMES MOTOR CORPORATION RIVAL CONSUMER SALES CORPORATIONBy:

/s/ Desiree DeStefanoName:

Desiree DeStefanoTitle:

Vice President
FORM OF 302 CERTIFICATION
			             EXHIBIT 31
			           CERTIFICATIONS

I, Helen M. Dickens, certify that:
       1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fund America
Investors Corporation II;
       2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;
       3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
       4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and have:
       (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
       (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
       (c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;
       5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):
       (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and
       (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
       6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: May 22, 2006                   /s/ Helen M Dickens
      ------------                   -------------------
                                     Helen M. Dickens
                                     President
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
§ 1650.17 Changes and cancellation of a post-employment distribution request. ( a ) *Before processing.* A pending post-employment distribution request can be cancelled if the cancellation is received and can be processed before the TSP record keeper processes the request. However, the TSP record keeper processes post-employment distribution requests each business day and those that are entered into the record keeping system by 12 noon eastern time will ordinarily be processed that night; those entered after 12 noon eastern time will be processed the next business day. Consequently, a cancellation request must be received and entered into the system before the cut-off for the day the request is submitted for processing in order to be effective to cancel the post-employment distribution.
( b ) *After processing.* A post-employment distribution election cannot be changed or cancelled after the withdrawal request has been processed. Consequently, funds disbursed cannot be returned to the TSP.
( c ) *Change in installment payments.* If a participant is receiving a series of installment payments, with appropriate supporting documentation as required by the TSP record keeper, the participant can change at any time: The payment amount or frequency (including stopping installment payments), the address to which the payments are mailed, the amount of federal tax withholding, whether or not a payment will be rolled over (if permitted) and the portion to be rolled over, the method by which direct payments to the participant are being sent (EFT or check), the identity of the financial institution to which payments are rolled over or sent directly to the participant by EFT, or the identity of the EFT account.
[87 FR 31683, May 24, 2022]