alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1525 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1525

 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau 
 of Reclamation, to conduct a feasibility study of the Tualatin River 
                            Basin in Oregon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 31, 2003

    Mr. Wu introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau 
 of Reclamation, to conduct a feasibility study of the Tualatin River 
                            Basin in Oregon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION TO CONDUCT FEASIBILITY STUDY.

    (a) Short Title.-- This section may be cited as the ``Tualatin 
River Basin Water Supply Enhancement Act of 2003''.
    (b) Authorization.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through 
the Bureau of Reclamation, is authorized to conduct a water supply 
feasibility study of the Tualatin River Basin in Oregon in order to--
            (1) identify ways to meet future water supply needs for 
        agriculture, municipal, and industrial uses;
            (2) identify water conservation and storage measures;
            (3) identify measures that would improve water quality and 
        enable environmental and species protection; and
            (4) where appropriate, evaluate integrated water resource 
        management and supply needs in the Tualatin River Basin in 
        Oregon.
    (c) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the costs of the study 
authorized by this section shall not exceed 50 percent of the total, 
and shall be nonreimbursable and nonreturnable.
    (d) No Supplemental or Additional Benefit.--Activities funded under 
this Act shall not be considered a supplemental or additional benefit 
under the Act of June 17, 1902 (32 Stat. 388) and all Acts amendatory 
thereof or supplementary thereto.
                                 <all>
```
#### Florence E. Anderson, as Administratrix of the Estate of Earl R. Anderson, Deceased, Appellant, v. Kendall Refining Company, Defendant, and City of Jamestown, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order grants a motion by defendant city to dismiss the amended complaint as to it in an action for damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
#### § 145.26 Rates of duty not binding.

Rates of duty assessed on a mail entry, whether assessed on the original entry or as amendments under § 145.24, are not binding for future importations. A binding ruling on tariff classification may be obtained in accordance with the procedures set forth in part 177 of this chapter.

[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 13369, May 21, 1973, as amended at 38 FR 17469, July 2, 1973; T.D. 78-99, 43 FR 13061, Mar. 29, 1978]
JanuaryJT201 1



## J^ S10-110125-0I 3

-; ViRTMEN TO F HNSPORTATIO N 

### ••;;TCPERATICN S COI-iTRO LN O


# m P 1^5

3 Th e Honorabl e Ra yLaHoo d Secretary U.S
. Departmen to fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S.E
. Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 Re ; Continuatio n o fAlask a Airlines ' Essentia l Ai rServic e a t Cordova
. Gustavus
. Petersburg
. Wranqeil
. an d Yakutat
. Alaska
. Docke t OST-1998-489 9 Dea rSecretaryLaHood : Thi s lette ri s t o expres s stron g support fo rth e selectio n o fAlask a Airline s t o continu e t o provid e essentia l ai rservic e t o ou rcommunity
. Alaska' s curren t patter n o fservic e - usin g je t aircraf t - meet s crucia l need s tha t woul d b e difficult , i f no t impossible , t o mee t wit h an yothe rtyp e o fservic e o raircraf t type : Alaska' s servic e connect s Southeas t Alask a passenger s t o on e o rmor e majo r communitie s o finterest , wit h single-plan e servic e t o Anchorage , Juneau , Ketchika n o r Seattle
. Fro m thes e hubs , ou rcommunit yca n acces s th e airline' s extensiv e rout e syste m an d benefi t fro m it s marketin g relationship s wit h othe rcarriers
. Th e 737-40 0 combinatio n ("combi" ) passenge ran d carg o aircraft , whic h Alask a Airline s propose s t o continu e usin g o n thi s route , provide s freight , mai l an d carg o capacit ytha t a non-je t carrie rsimpl ycanno tprovide
. Further , th e 737-40 0 comb i aircraf t i s equippe d wit h Require d Navigatio n Performanc e Technolog yprecisio n technology , whic h enable s th e airlin e t o reliabl yacces s th e airport durin g inclemen t weather , thu s reducin g diversion s an d cancellation s and , i n turn , enablin g peopl e an d product s t o dependabl yreac h th e community
. I n sum , Alaska' s je tservic e i s critica l t o th e economi cwel l bein g o fou r community
. Fo rthes e reasons , w e respectfull yurg e DO Tt o selec t Alask a Airline s t o continu e t o provid e essentia l ai rservic e t o Southeas t Alaska , a s th e airlin e ha s successfull ydon e fo rmor e tha n thirt yyears . Sincerely , 

# / ^ ^<F ^

,Uj:£^y^
. / ^

^ f>^J^7 ^
cc : Susa n Kurland , Assistan t Secretaryfo rAviatio n an d Internationa l Affair s Denni s DeVany , Chief , EA S an d Domesti cAnalysi s Th e Honorabl e Sea n Parnell , Governor , Stat e o fAlask a Mar cA
. Luiken , Commissioner , Alask a Stat e Departmen t o fTransportatio n an d Publi cFacilitie s
### §5581. Participation by House in interparliamentary institutions; reception of members of foreign legislative bodies and foreign officials; meetings with Government officials

(a) It is the purpose of this section to enable the House of Representatives more properly to discharge and coordinate its activities and responsibilities in connection with participation in various interparliamentary institutions, to facilitate the interchange and reception in the United States of members of foreign legislative bodies and permanent officials of foreign governments, and to enable the House of Representatives to host meetings with senior United States Government officials and other dignitaries in order to discuss matters relevant to United States relations with other countries.

(b) For payment of expenses incurred in carrying out subsection (a) of this section, there shall be paid out of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives, until otherwise provided by law, such sums as may be necessary but not to exceed $40,000 in any calendar year. Such payments shall be made on vouchers signed by the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and approved by the Committee on House Oversight.

(Pub. L. 95–391, title I, §111, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 777; Pub. L. 103–437, §2(b), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4581; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §204(72), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1741; Pub. L. 105–275, title I, §102, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2438; Pub. L. 108–83, title I, §103(e), Sept. 30, 2003, 117 Stat. 1017.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 130–1 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is based on section 1 of House Resolution No. 1047, Ninety-fifth Congress, Apr. 4, 1978, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 95–391.

#### Amendments

2003—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 108–83 substituted "$40,000" for "$80,000".

1998—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 105–275 substituted "$80,000" for "$55,000".

1996—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "applicable accounts of the House of Representatives" for "contingent fund of the House" and "House Oversight" for "House Administration".

1994—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–437 substituted "Committee on Foreign Affairs" for "Committee on International Relations".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on House Oversight of House of Representatives changed to Committee on House Administration of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Jan. 6, 1999.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3620] 

In accordance with a notice received from the Department of Homeland Security—Federal Emergency Management Agency—effective October 4, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a result of this disaster to December 11, 2004. 

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.*, the deadline for filing applications for economic injury is June 6, 2005.                 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) 

Dated: October 12, 2004. 

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 04-23273 Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ ADRIENNE FALZON, AS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF AND ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF PAUL GIACCIO, Petitioner

- Appellant

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent

- Appellee

______________________
2023

- 1659

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:21

- vv

- 01082

- EMR, Judge Eleni M. Roumel.

______________________
Decided: July 15, 2024

______________________
D AVID G REGORY R OGERS , Rogers, Hofrichter & Karrh, LLC, Fayetteville, GA, argued for petitioner

- appellant.

V ORIS E DWARD J OHNSON , J R ., Torts Branch, Civil Division, United State s Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent

- appellee. Also represented by B RIAN M. B OYNTON , C. S ALVATORE D’A LESSIO , T RACI P ATTON , H EATHER L YNN P EARLMAN

. Case: 23-1659 Document: 32 Page: 1 Filed: 07/15/2024FALZON v. HHS 2

______________________

Before M OORE , Chief Judge
, L OURIE and S TARK , Circuit Judges

. M OORE , Chief Judge

. Petitioner Adrienne Falzon, legal representative andadministrator of the estate of Paul Giaccio, appeals a decision from the United States Court of Federal Claims sustaining a special master’s dismissal of her Petition for Compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 10 et seq . as time barred. A petition was required to be filed within 24 months of Mr. Giaccio’s death. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 16(a)(3).Petitioner filed 119 days after the deadline. Petitioner argued equitable tolling should apply for various periods of time, which would render the petition timely. While we sympathize with P etitioner and P etitioner’s counsel, even crediting P etitioner with equitable tolling for the illness of counsel and counsel’s father, we n onetheless agree with the Court of Federal Claims that Petitioner has not establishedcircumstances warranting equitable tolling for the required 119 days to make the petition timely. We affirm.
AFFIRMED
C OSTS
No costs. Case: 23-1659 Document: 32 Page: 2 Filed: 07/15/2024
#### § 148.21 Opening of baggage, compartments, or vehicles.

A Customs officer has the right to open and examine all baggage, compartments and vehicles brought into the United States under Sections 461, 462, 496 and 582, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1461, 1462, 1496, and 1582) and 19 U.S.C. 482. To the extent practical, the owner or his agent shall be asked to open the baggage, compartment or vehicle first. If the owner or his agent is unavailable or refuses to open the baggage, compartment, or vehicle, it shall be opened by the Customs officer. If any article subject to duty, or any prohibited article is found upon opening by the Customs officer, the whole contents and the baggage or vehicle shall be subject to forfeiture, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1462.

[T.D. 95-86, 60 FR 54188, Oct. 20, 1995]
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 10609 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. JOA Q U I N D EL EO N - G AL VE Z , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e N ort h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 5: 09- C R - 6- 1 B ef ore K IN G , JO L L Y , an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * The Fed e r alPubl i c D e fe nde ra pp o i nt e d t o r e pr e s e nt Jo aq ui n DeLe o nG a l ve z h a s m ov ed f

or leav e to w i th d ra w an d h a s f i l ed a b ri ef i n acco rd a n ce w i th A n d e r s v . C a lif

o rn ia , 3 86 U . S. 7 38 ( 19 67 ) . D e Leo n- G alve z ha s no tf i l e d a r e s po ns e . O uri nde pe nde ntre vi e w of t he re c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no n on frivo l ou s is s u e for ap p ea l . A ccord i n gly, cou n sel’ s m oti on f or leav e to w i t hdr aw i s G RA N TE D , c o uns e li s e xc us e d f r o m f ur t he rr e s po ns ibi l i t i e s he r e i n, a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December

15, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
### SUBCHAPTER I—ORGANIZATION
###### Editorial Note on Part 174

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 174 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93025, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 174.0 Scope.

This part deals with the administrative review of decisions of the port director and Center director, including the requirements for the filing of protests against such decisions, amendment of protests, review and accelerated disposition, and provisions dealing with further administrative review. Provisions applicable to Canadian and Mexican exporters and producers regarding administrative review and appeal of adverse marking decisions under the North American Free Trade Agreement are contained in part 181 of this chapter.

[T.D. 70-181, 35 FR 13429, Aug. 22, 1970, as amended by T.D. 94-1, 58 FR 69472, Dec. 30, 1993]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice of Request for Information; Correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The National Science Foundation (NSF) published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of December 11, 2018, concerning a Request for Information on the National Strategic Overview for Quantum Information Science. There was a broken link in the notice.                    

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of December 11, 2018, in FR Doc. 2018-26754, on page 63685, in the third column, please correct the web link to read:                         *https://www.surveymonkey.com/​r/​QIS-RFI_​Responses*.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        C. Denise Caldwell at (703) 292-7371 or                         *nsfscqis@nsf.gov.*                         Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday.                    

Dated: December 11, 2018.

Suzanne H. Plimpton,

Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.

[FR Doc. 2018-27151 Filed 12-13-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
§ 148.24 Determination of dutiable value. ( a ) *Principles applied.* In determining the dutiable value of articles examined under § 148.23, the Customs inspector shall apply the principles of section 402, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1401a), and shall not regard the declared value or price as conclusive.
( b ) *Adjustment of value declared.* An adjustment shall be made by the Customs inspector whenever the purchase price or value declared differs from the fair retail value, whether by reason of depreciation due to wear or use, circumstances of purchase, or acquisition, or for any other reason. He shall give due consideration to the condition of the articles at the time of importation, but he shall not make any allowance for wear and use in excess of 25 per centum of the declared price or value of a worn or used article. A passenger who desires to claim a larger allowance may arrange for formal entry and appraisement of his goods.
[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. 87-89, 52 FR 24445, July 1, 1987]
### §59f. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 59f was editorially reclassified as section 504 of this title.
|                                     |                  | Exhibit 99(a)
|------------------------------------ | ---------------- | -------------
|Household Finance Corporation        |                  |              
|Household Consumer Loan Corporation  |                  |              
|Household Consumer Loan Trust 1997-2 |                  |              
|                                     |                  |              
|Original Principal Class A           | 1,050,000,000.00 |              
|Class A-1                            | 912,000,000.00   |              
|Class A-2                            | 48,000,000.00    |              
|Class A-3                            | 90,000,000.00    |              
|Number of Class A Bonds (000's)      | 1,050,000.00     |              
|Class A-1                            | 912,000.00       |              
|Class A-2                            | 48,000.00        |              
|Class A-3                            | 90,000.00        |              
|Original Principal Class B           | 57,000,000.00    |              
|Number of Class B Bonds (000's)      | 57,000.00        |              
|Original Principal Certificates      | 42,000,000.00    |              
|Number of Certificate Bonds (000's)  | 42,000.00        |              
|                                     |                  |              
|Distribution Date                    |                  | 2003 Total   
|                                     |                  |              
|                                     |                  |              
|Principal Distribution               |                  | 94,815,951.03
|Class A-1 Interest Distribution      |                  | 1,446,438.43 
|                                     |                  |              
|Principal Distribution               |                  | 7,619,535.74 
|Class A-2 Interest Distribution      |                  | 367,446.48   
|                                     |                  |              
|Principal Distribution               |                  | 4,054,071.62 
|Class A-3 Interest Distribution      |                  | 507,271.66   
|                                     |                  |              
|CLASS B                              |                  |              
|Principal Distribution               |                  | 3,266,123.75 
|Interest Distribution                |                  | 374,767.96   
|                                     |                  |              
|CERTIFICATES                         |                  |              
|Principal Distribution               |                  | 4,336,807.79 
|Interest Distribution                |                  | 342,132.14
FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/24/2015 5:00:32 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 20

- 00008

- CR

IN RE TODD O ’ KEITH SMITH

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Todd O ’ Keith Smith has filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial judge of the 276th Judicial District Court of Marion County, Texas, to rule on his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc, which seeks removal of a deadly

- weapon finding contained in t he judgment convicting Smith of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. We deny Smith ’ s petition for writ of mandamus because he failed to provide us with a record to support his entitlement to mandamus relief. To be entitled to mandamus relief, the rela tor must show (1) that he has no adequate remedy at law and (2) that the action he seeks to compel is ministerial, not one involving a discretionary or judicial decision. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals at Texarkana , 236
S.W.3 d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (orig. proceeding). The relator must also provide this Court with a record sufficient to establish his right to mandamus relief. Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding); In re Pilgrim ’ s Pride Corp. , 187 S.W.3d 197, 198

– 99 (Tex. App.

— Texarkana 2006, orig. proceeding); see T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.3. Before mandamus may issue, the relator must show that the trial court had a legal duty to perform a ministerial act, was asked to do so, and failed or r efused to act. In re Villarreal , 96 S.W.3d 708, 710 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 2003, orig. proceeding); see also In re Blakeney , 254 S.W.3d 659, 662 (Tex. App.

— Texarkana 2008, orig. proceeding) ( “ Showing that a motion was filed with the court clerk does not cons titute proof that the motion was brought to the trial court ’ s attention or presented to the trial court with a request for a ruling. ” ).3 Smith has filed an insufficient record with this Court since it does not contain the judgment against him or any evidenc e showing that his motions and requests were presented to the trial court. Thus, Smith has failed to provide this Court with a record sufficient to establish that he is entitled to mandamus relief. See Walker , 827 S.W.2d at 837. We deny Smith ’ s petition for writ of mandamus

.

Josh R. Morriss, III Chief Justice

Date Submitted: January 23 , 2020 Date Decided: January 24 , 2020 Do Not Publish