alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1820.12 Definitions.

The following definitions apply to this part.

*Demand* means an order, subpoena, or other command of a court or other competent authority for OSC's production or release of records or for an OSC employee's appearance and testimony in a legal proceeding.

*General Counsel* means OSC's General Counsel or an individual to whom the General Counsel has delegated authority under this part.

*Legal proceeding* means any matter before a court of law, administrative board or tribunal, commission, administrative law judge, hearing officer, or other body that conducts a legal or administrative proceeding.

*OSC employee* or *employee* means any current or former OSC employee or contractor, including but not limited to OSC: temporary employees, interns, volunteers, consultants, and/or other advisors.

*Records* or *official records and information* means all information in OSC's custody and control, relating to information in OSC's custody and control, or acquired by an OSC employee in the performance of official duties.

*Request* means any request, by whatever method, for the production of records and information or for testimony which has not been ordered by a court or other competent authority.

*Testimony* means any written or oral statements, including depositions, answers to interrogatories, affidavits, declarations, and interviews made by an individual in connection with a legal proceeding.
#### § 4.17 Vessels from discriminating countries.

The prohibition against imports in, and the penalty of forfeiture of, certain vessels from countries which discriminate against American vessels provided for in subsections 2 and 3 of paragraph J, section IV, Tariff Act of 1913, as amended by the act of March 4, 1915 (19 U.S.C. 130, 131), shall be enforced only in pursuance of specific instructions issued and published from time to time by the Secretary of the Treasury or such other officer as the Secretary may designate. (See also §§ 4.20(c) and 159.42 of this chapter.)

[28 FR 14596, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17444, July 2, 1973]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 27, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62738-62739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24011]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Data Collection Available for Public Comments and Recommendations

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces the Small Business Administration's intentions to 
request approval on a new and/or currently approved information 
collection.

DATES: Submit comments on or before December 27, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Send all comments regarding whether this information 
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the function of 
the agency, whether the burden estimates are accurate, and if there are 
ways to

[[Page 62739]]

minimize the estimated burden and enhance the quality of the 
collection, to Edsel Brown, Assistant Administrator, Office of 
Technology, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 
8800, Washington, DC 20416.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edsel M. Brown Jr., Assistant 
Administrator, 202-205-7343, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1c79786f7970327e6e736b725c6f7e7d327b736a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2d48495e4841034f5f425a436d5e4f4c034a425b">[email protected]</span></a> or Curtis B. Rich, 
Management Analyst, 202-205-7030.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title: ``Data Collection for SBIR/STTR Public and Government 
Databases''.
    Description of Respondents: All firms or individuals applying for a 
Phase 1 or Phase II award from the SBIR or STTR programs.
    Form No.: N/A.
    Annual Responses: 30,000.
    Annual Burden: 15,000.

Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
[FR Doc. 04-24011 Filed 10-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### John W. Zobel, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant.

The plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. He voluntarily placed his head in a position of danger and kept it there, without paying attention to the tunnel from which he knew a train would come towards his head. He had control of his head and feet, even though his hearing was affected by the sounds of vomiting. For him a *“*proper viewpoint ” was not one of place alone but also of time. Every second he remained, the likelihood of a train arriving increased. He was not a traveler crossing a railroad track who could rely on a look at a proper viewpoint before crossing. He was heedless of ordinary precautions in a place of known danger. *(Schrader*v. *New York, Chicago & St. Louis R. R. Co.,*254 N. Y. 148, 151.) He invited the result. *(Zurich Gen. Accident & Liability Ins. Co.*v. *Childs Co.,*253 N. Y. 324, 327.) *783Therefore, although the jury could say the motorman was negligent, plaintiff cannot recover because, in our opinion, his own negligence continued along with that of the motorman and contributed to his injuries, as a matter of law. *(Hernandez*v. *Brooklyn & Queens Tr. Corp.,*284 N. Y. 535; *Panarese*v. *Union Ry. Co.,*261 N. Y. 233.) Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur; Sneed, J., concurs in result; Nolan, P. J., and Carswell, J., dissent and vote to affirm.
No. 99-20464 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20464 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HUEY ANDY NGUYEN, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CR-226-1

-------------------- April 14, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Huey Andy Nguyen appeals his conviction for bank robbery. Nguyen argues that the district court abused its discretion when it allowed evidence of a prior criminal act provided by two witnesses. Nguyen argues that the evidence was extrinsic and that the evidence had little probative value and was highly prejudicial. The evidence was intrinsic because the evidence of a prior criminal act was inextricably intertwined with Trung Nguyen’s decision to help Nguyen rob the bank. See United States v.No. 99-20464 -2-
Navarro , 169 F.3d 228, 232-33 (5th Cir. 1999). Thus, no Rule 404(b) determinations were not required, and no limiting instruction was required. See id. at 233. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
§ 1620.11 Scope. This subpart applies to any individual participating in CSRS or FERS who: ( a ) Has been appointed or otherwise assigned to one of the cooperative extension services, as defined in 7 U.S.C. 3103(5);
( b ) Has entered on approved leave without pay to serve as a full-time officer or employee of an organization composed primarily of employees as defined by 5 U.S.C. 8331(1) and 8401(11); or
( c ) Has been assigned, on an approved leave-without-pay basis, from a Federal agency to a state or local government under 5 U.S.C. chapter 33, subchapter VI.
§ 2413.7 Transcripts, recordings or minutes of closed meeting; public availability; retention. ( a ) For every meeting, or portion thereof, closed under the provisions of § 2413.4, the presiding officer shall prepare a statement setting forth the time and place of the meeting and the persons present, which statement shall be retained by the agency. For each such meeting, or portion thereof, there shall also be maintained a complete transcript or electronic recording of the proceedings, except that for meetings closed pursuant to § 2413.4(a), the Authority may, in lieu of a transcript or electronic recording, maintain a set of minutes fully and accurately summarizing any action taken, the reasons therefor and views thereon, documents considered and the members' vote on each rollcall vote.
( b ) The agency shall make promptly available to the public copies of transcripts, recordings or minutes maintained as provided in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, except to the extent the items therein contain information which the agency determines may be withheld pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552b(c). Copies of transcripts or minutes, or transcriptions of electronic recordings including the identification of speakers, shall to the extent determined to be publicly available, be furnished to any person, subject to the payment of duplication costs in accordance with the schedule of fees set forth in § 2411.10 of this subchapter and the actual cost of transcription.
( c ) The agency shall maintain a complete verbatim copy of the transcript, a complete copy of the minutes, or a complete electronic recording of each meeting, or portion of a meeting, closed to the public, for a period of at least two (2) years after such meeting or until one (1) year after the conclusion of any agency proceeding with respect to which the meeting or portion was held whichever occurs later.
114 STAT. 1924 PUBLIC LAW 106–440—NOV. 6, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4625:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Sept. 19, considered and passed House.

Oct. 24, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–440

106th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2108 East

38th Street in Erie, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Gertrude A. Barber Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

2108 East 38th Street in Erie, Pennsylvania, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Gertrude A. Barber Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Gertrude

A. Barber Post Office Building’’.

Approved November 6, 2000.

Nov. 6, 2000

[H.R. 4625]
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2014-0491

 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM023AD

604-57-007 --- 9/26/13

605-57-005 --- 9/26/13

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
### §675. Law clerks and secretaries

The Chief Justice of the United States, and the associate justices of the Supreme Court may appoint law clerks and secretaries whose salaries shall be fixed by the Court.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 919.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1926 ed., §328 (June 1, 1922, ch. 204, title II, 42 Stat. 614; Jan. 3, 1923, ch. 21, title II, 42 Stat. 1081; May 28, 1924, ch. 204, title II, 43 Stat. 218; Feb. 27, 1925, ch. 364, title II, 43 Stat. 1028).

Section is derived from Appropriation Acts for fiscal years cited in the credits. It was omitted from the 1934 and 1940 editions of the U.S. Code because it was considered to be probably of a temporary nature. This section is consistent with other provisions authorizing the appointment of similar personnel for circuit and district judges.

The 1942 appropriation act (July 2, 1942, ch. 472, title IV, 56 Stat. 501) made provision for "all other officers and employees, whose compensation shall be fixed by the Court, except as otherwise provided by law and who may be assigned by the Chief Justice to any office or work of the Court."

The salary limitation of $3,600 was omitted and the Court authorized to fix law clerks' salaries. Current appropriation acts provide that salaries of the Court's officers and employees, except the clerk and reporter, shall be fixed by the Court.

See section 711 et seq. and section 751 et seq., of this title, relating to appointment of law clerks and secretaries to circuit and district judges.

Changes were made in phraseology.
<PAGE>   1
 
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
     Each person whose signature appears below authorizes Michael Williams,
Chairman of the Board, or Paul Skubic, President, to execute in the name of each
such person who is then an officer or director of the registrant, and to file,
the 1998 Harris Preferred Capital Corporation Annual Report to the Securities
and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
<TABLE>
<S>                                                <C>
 
/s/ DAVID BLOCKOWICZ                               /s/ PAUL R. SKUBIC
--------------------------------------------       --------------------------------------------
David Blockowicz                                   Paul R. Skubic
Director                                           Director
 
/s/ FRANK M. NOVOSEL                               /s/ DELBERT WACKER
--------------------------------------------       --------------------------------------------
Frank M. Novosel                                   Delbert Wacker
Director                                           Director
 
/s/ THOMAS R. SIZER                                /s/ MICHAEL D. WILLIAMS
--------------------------------------------       --------------------------------------------
Thomas R. Sizer                                    Michael D. Williams
Director                                           Director
</TABLE>
#### § 1653.22 Purpose.

Under 5 U.S.C. 8437(e)(3) and 8467(a)(2), the TSP record keeper will honor a court order or other similar process in the nature of a garnishment that is brought to enforce a judgment against a participant for physically, sexually, or emotionally abusing a child.

[FR 35510, June 13, 2003, as amended at 87 FR 31691, May 24, 2022]
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-21 May 31, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS LATEST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

FOR PALO VERDE NUCLEAR PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of Arizona Public

Service Co. to discuss the latest Plant Performance Review results for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating

Station, a three-unit nuclear power plant the company operates about 75 miles west of Phoenix.

The public meeting will begin at 10 a.m. on Tuesday, June 6, in the Energy Information Center

Auditorium at the Palo Verde site. The meeting is open for public observation, and NRC officials will

be available afterward to answer questions.

Plant Performance Reviews are used to evaluate safety performance information and identify

any changes in plant performance so the NRC can allocate inspection resources appropriately. The text

of the PPR letter is available from the NRC Office of Public Affairs and has been posted on the NRC

website at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr.

###
#### Enrique TORTOLEDO-GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-74817.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.**

Filed Feb. 21, 2006.

*494William Baker, Esq., Chula Vista, CA, for Petitioner.

CAS-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Patricia A. Smith, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Enrique Tortoledo-Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s denial of his application" for cancellation of removal for failure to establish ten years of continuous physical presence in the United States, as required under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(A). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.

Tortoledo-Gonzalez contends that his three voluntary departures did not cause breaks in his continuous physical presence because he was not brought before an immigration judge, but rather was returned to the border by border patrol officers, and so the voluntary departures were not effected under threat of deportation or removal under *Vasquez-Lopez v. Ashcroft,*343 F.3d 961 (9th Cir.2003) (per curiam). Tortoledo-Gonzalez testified that when detained by the border patrol, he signed documents agreeing to voluntary departure instead of “continuing to be detained but asking that [his] case be heard before an Immigration Judge.” Thus, unlike the petitioner in *Tapia v. Gonzales,*430 F.3d 997 (9th Cir.2005), the record does not support Tortoledo-Gonzalez’s contention that he returned to Mexico without the threat of deportation or removal.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 jjjjg disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF KING PHARMACEUTICALS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,451
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,864)
<INVENTORY>                                     33,410
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,673
<PP&E>                                         109,996
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (12,845)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 805,689
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,750
<BONDS>                                        150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     148,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   805,689
<SALES>                                        348,271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               348,271
<CGS>                                          113,204
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  220,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              55,371
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 73,046
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,392
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             45,654
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (705)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    44,949
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .93


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1560

NATHANIEL E. DOZIER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. HENRY PARKER; WILLIAM A. ROBERTSON, JR.; JOSEPH A. LEMING, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-00019-JRS)

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 14, 2009

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel E. Dozier, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles Richard Cranwell, CRANWELL MOORE & EMICK, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, Mark Quentin Emick, Jr., CRANWELL MOORE & EMICK, PLC, Vinton, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Nathaniel E. Dozier, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil action against Henry Parker and William A. Robertson, Jr., members of the Board of Supervisors of Prince George County, Virginia, and Joseph A. Leming, a former member. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dozier v. Parker , No. 3:09-cv00019-JRS (E.D. Va. Apr. 22, 2009). We deny the Appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal or disregard Dozier’s informal reply brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED