alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. III-01-043 September 14, 2001

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $11,000 FINE FOR RADIATION OVEREXPOSURE

LAST YEAR AT SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed an $11,000 fine against Southeast Missouri

State University in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, for violations of NRC regulations associated with a radiation

overexposure to a contractor in June of last year.

The overexposure occurred during work by the contractor to inventory and remove radioactive

material stored in a safe in the basement of Magill Hall at the university. Subsequently, radioactive

contamination was found in several areas of the building. The contamination was successfully cleaned up.

The contractor was exposed to airborne americium-241 which, when inhaled, is largely deposited in a

personís bones. This resulted in a radiation dose of 263 rems to the bone surface, exceeding the NRC annual

dose limit of 50 rem to individual organs or body tissues.

The university was cited for failing to make the necessary radiation surveys to determine the hazards

present; for failure to control activities to avoid exceeding the NRC radiation dose limits; and for possessing

radioactive material -- americium-241 and two other radioactive isotopes -- that was not authorized in the

universityís NRC license.

The amount of the proposed fine was doubled because the university took four months to determine

the contents of the safe once it was questioned by an NRC inspector; because it possessed the material for 10

years without license authorization; and for failing to implement an effective radiation protection program

which allowed the problems to persist and contributed to the overexposure.

There were two additional violations for which a fine was not assessed. These violations were failing

to secure a strontium-90 sealed source, which could not be accounted for in the universityís inventory and

failing to have a radiation safety officer from August 1999 until July of last year.

The NRC staff noted that the university had taken extensive corrective actions after the

contamination occurred including retaining a qualified contractor to survey and clean up the contamination

and assess individuals who might have been exposed to the americium-241.
The university has until October 15 to pay the fine or to protest it. If the fine is protested and

subsequently imposed by the NRC staff, the university may request a hearing.

# # # # #
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED,

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Multimedia Games, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Clifton E. Lind, Chief Executive Officer, and Craig S. Nouis, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that, based upon my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 17, 2004 |  | /s/ Clifton E. Lind    
|                   |  | Clifton E. Lind        
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ Craig S. Nouis     
|                   |  | Craig S. Nouis         
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Multimedia Games, Inc. and will be retained by Multimedia Games, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Sigmund Pollack, Appellant, v. James T. Aspbury et al., as Executors and Trustees of Daniel J. Gleason, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.
#### Blanche Small, Respondent, v. William Small, Appellant.

Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 1071.]
#### ENNEVER, Guardian, Respondent, v. OGDIE, Appellant.

(183 N. W. 130.)

(File No. 4882.

Opinion filed June 2, 1921.)

Indecent Assault — Suit for Damages — Finding of Damages, Evidence Held Sufficient.

In a suit by a guardian of a minor child, about. 13 years of age, to recover damages for an alleged indecent assault by defendant upon the person of said minor, held, that the evidence was amply sufficient to sustain a verdict in $1,250.00 for plaintiff, the verdict not being excessive.

Polley, P. J., not sitting.

Appeal from 'Circuit Court, Minnehaha County. Hon John T. Medin, Judge.

Action by May Ennever, as guardian of Dorothy Rigdon, a minor child, to recover damages for an alleged indecent assault made by defendant upon the person of said minor child. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

*Skinner & Bartelt,*for Appellant.

*Christopherson, Melquist & Davenport,*for Respondent.

McGOY, J.

This action was instituted by plaintiff, as the guardian of one Dorothy Rigdon, a minor child about ,13 years of age, to recover damages on account of an alleged indecent as*213sault made by defendant upon the person of said minor child. There was verdict for plaintiff. From a judgment based on said verdict defendant appeals.

The principal contention of appellant is that the evidence was not sufficient to sustain said verdict. W'e are of the opinion that the evidence was amply sufficient to sustain such verdict, and that such verdict is not excessive. It will serve no useful purpose to repeat or further refer to the evidence. All the assignments of error have been carefully examined and considered.

Finding no prejudicial error in the record, the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

POLLEY, P. J., not sitting.
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10

MEMO

     DATED: 6/1/01

     TO:    Virginia Cortinas, AL Fischer

     CC:    7 J OFFICE

     FROM:  Joel Hazlett

     RE:    7J/ Rattlesnake Hay Co.

     7J and Rattlesnake have entered into a 50/50 partnership on Hay baling
     equipment. 7J need to set up a property (HAYCO) that will joint bill
     Rattlesnake 50% of the expenses on invoices coded to HAYCO. Randy is
     setting up a bank account that all money received for hay baling services
     or hay sales will be put into. When note payments are due he will pay note
     payment on the equipment from this account and split any money left between
     7J and Rattlesnake.

     I will create an invoice on any hay baling or hay sales so that we can
     keep proper records of all invoicing for HAYCO.

     Moneys received will go to Virginia for Deposit in the proper account.

     If you have any questions, please contact me.


     Joel Hazlett
     /s/ Joel Hazlett

     JH/ba

     Attachments


     6/1/01
From: McCabe, Janet

Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 7:25 PM

To: Green, Gregory; Wood, Gil

Cc: Koerber, Mike; Page, Steve; Powers, Tom

Subject: For the docket on woodstoves

I wanted to pass along, for your information and for purposes of the docket, that Janice Nolen of ALA

called me this evening to make two points/requests for the woodstoves rule. First was that we stick

with the 1.3 gr.hr standard for wood and pellet stoves, and second was that we use the same approach

to te sting for all devices and not use the averaging approach. Her reason for both points is to ensure

that the rule provides as much protection as possible.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 AMSURG CORP.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Christopher A. HoldenChristopher A. HoldenPresident and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the CompanyNovember 2, 2007
 /s/ Claire M. GulmiClaire M. GulmiExecutive Vice President

and Chief Financial

Officer of the CompanyNovember 2, 2007
### §85. Patents for lands, with reservation of coal; disposal of coal deposits

Upon satisfactory proof of full compliance with the provisions of the laws under which entry is made, and of sections 83 to 85 of this title, the entryman shall be entitled to a patent to the land entered by him, which patent shall contain a reservation to the United States of all the coal in the lands so patented, together with the right to prospect for, mine, and remove the same. The coal deposits in such lands shall be subject to disposal by the United States in accordance with the provisions of the coal-land laws in force at the time of such disposal. Any person qualified to acquire coal deposits or the right to mine and remove the coal under the laws of the United States shall have the right, at all times, to enter upon the lands selected, entered, or patented, as provided by sections 83 to 85 of this title, for the purpose of prospecting for coal thereon upon the approval by the Secretary of the Interior of a bond or undertaking to be filed with him as security for the payment of all damages to the crops and improvements on such lands by reason of such prospecting. Any person who has acquired from the United States the coal deposits in any such land, or the right to mine or remove the same, may reenter and occupy so much of the surface thereof as may be required for all purposes reasonably incident to the mining and removal of the coal therefrom, and mine and remove the coal, upon payment of the damages caused thereby to the owner thereof, or upon giving a good and sufficient bond or undertaking in an action instituted in any competent court to ascertain and fix said damages. The owner under such limited patent shall have the right to mine coal for use upon the land for domestic purposes at any time prior to the disposal by the United States of the coal deposits. Nothing herein contained shall be held to deny or abridge the right to present and have prompt consideration of applications to locate, enter, or select, under the land laws of the United States, lands which have been classified as coal lands with a view of disproving such classification and securing a patent without reservation.

(June 22, 1910, ch. 318, §3, 36 Stat. 584.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Supplemental Provisions

See note set out under section 83 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,278
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,089
<ALLOWANCES>                                       652
<INVENTORY>                                      5,983
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,766
<PP&E>                                          37,955
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,477
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,864
<BONDS>                                         19,364
<COMMON>                                         6,315
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,239
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,176
<SALES>                                        179,432
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               179,432
<CGS>                                          142,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  142,343
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,684
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 833
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,164
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,240
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,925
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,925
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
        

</TABLE>
#### § 12.108 Detention of articles; time in which to comply.

If the importer cannot produce the certificate or evidence required in § 12.107 at the time of making entry, the port director shall take the sculpture or mural into Customs custody and send it to a bonded warehouse or public store to be held at the risk and expense of the consignee until the certificate or evidence is presented to such officer. The certificate or evidence must be presented within 90 days after the date on which the sculpture or mural is taken into Customs custody, or such longer period as may be allowed by the port director for good cause shown.

[T.D. 73-119, 38 FR 10807, May 2, 1973]
§ 145.42 Proof for conditionally free merchandise. The port director may, at his discretion, require appropriate proof of duty-free status before releasing conditionally free merchandise. This proof may be obtained by either of the following methods: ( a ) *Retain shipment and request proof.* The shipment may be retained by the port director while the necessary proof is requested from the addressee. If the requested proof is not received within 30 days, a mail entry shall be issued at the ordinary rate of duty which would apply if the merchandise were not conditionally free, and the mail entry shall be forwarded with the shipment for collection of duties.
( b ) *Send shipment with form and entry.* If the only proof required for free entry is a declaration signed by the addressee, the port director may issue a mail entry at the ordinary duty which would apply if the merchandise were not conditionally free. The shipment shall then be forwarded together with the mail entry, a copy of the appropriate declaration form, and instructions to the postmaster to deliver the shipment free of duty if the importer executes the declaration, and to collect the full duty shown on the mail entry if the importer does not execute the declaration.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-03-029 July 2, 2003

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO HOLD REGULATORY CONFERENCE

WITH ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a regulatory conference with

officials of Entergy Operations, Inc., operator of Arkansas Nuclear One, on Thursday, July 10. 

Conferees will discuss the significance of an inspection finding involving a fire protection issue. 

The facility, which includes two operating reactors, is located near Russellville, Arkansas. 

The meeting, which is open to public observation, will begin at 9 a.m. in NRC Region IV

offices in Arlington, Texas. The public will have the opportunity to ask questions of the NRC

staff before the meeting is adjourned.

The NRC will discuss with Entergy officials the inspection finding and an associated

apparent violation of NRC requirements for fire protection. The finding was identified in an

inspection completed on July 13, 2001. It concerns the acceptability of the licensee’s use of

manual operator actions to operate equipment necessary for achieving and maintaining the hot

shutdown of the plant remotely, in lieu of providing protection from fire damage for electrical

cables necessary to ensure the operability of that equipment.

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear power plants with a

color coded process which classifies regulatory findings as either green, white, yellow or red, in

increasing order of safety significance. 

Remote public observation of the meeting will be allowed from the NRC’s headquarters

in Rockville, Maryland, at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, 3rd floor, Room B-4.

Interested observers should contact meeting coordinator, Tom Alexion, at (301) 415-1347, 

indicating their intention to attend, so that adequate copies of meeting materials are available and

arrangements for a security escort to the meeting room can be made.. 
- 2 -

No decision on the final significance, the apparent violation or any contemplated

enforcement action will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC

officials at a later time.

###
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

MARY BARNES,

Petitioner

v.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent

______________________ 

2021-1799

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. DC-0752-20-0202-I-2.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JENNIE CATHRYNE BLAINE WATSON, Alan Lescht and 

Associates, PC, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. 

 BRET VALLACHER, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil 

Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BRIAN 

M. BOYNTON, TARA K. HOGAN, PATRICIA M. MCCARTHY. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

Case: 21-1799 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 02/11/2022
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and CUNNINGHAM,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

February 11, 2022

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 21-1799 Document: 45 Page: 2 Filed: 02/11/2022
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1505 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1505

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   2127 Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, North Carolina, as the ``Jim 
                        Richardson Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2127 
Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, North Carolina, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Jim Richardson Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jim Richardson Post 
Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
     from the June 30, 2000 Form 10-Q/A and is qualified in its
     entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                         <C>                   <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>               3-MOS                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-2000       JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-2000       JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                           12,770             12,770
<SECURITIES>                        500                500
<RECEIVABLES>                    24,611             24,611
<ALLOWANCES>                        270                270
<INVENTORY>                       4,415              4,415
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 48,873             48,873
<PP&E>                           50,071             50,071
<DEPRECIATION>                   28,096             28,096
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  256,735            256,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            12,679             12,679
<BONDS>                               0                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0                  0
<PREFERRED>                           0                  0
<COMMON>                            194                194
<OTHER-SE>                       99,413             99,413
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    256,735            256,735
<SALES>                               0                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 32,966             62,409
<CGS>                                 0                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    15,229             27,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  3,434              6,354
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                2,578              5,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   5,276             10,637
<INCOME-TAX>                      2,174              4,238
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               3,102              6,399
<DISCONTINUED>                        0                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0                  0
<CHANGES>                             0                  0
<NET-INCOME>                      3,102              6,399
<EPS-BASIC>                        0.19               0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0.19               0.39



</TABLE>