OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR IRAQ RECONSTRUCTION

CCHHAALLLLEENNGGEESS FFAACCEEDD IINN CCAARRRRYYIINNGG

OOUUTT IIRRAAQQ RREELLIIEEFF AANNDD

RREECCOONNSSTTRRUUCCTTIIOONN FFUUNNDD

AACCTTIIVVIITTIIEESS

SSIIGGIIRR--0055--002299 

JJJAAANNNUUUAAARRRYYY 222666,,,222000000666
SPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR IRAQ RECONSTRUCTION

400 Army Navy Drive • Arlington, Virginia 22202

January 26, 2006 

MEMORANDUM FOR U.S. AMBASSADOR FOR IRAQ 

SUBJECT: Challenges Faced in Carrying Out Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund 

Activities (SIGIR-05-029) 

We are providing this report for your information and use. We performed the audit in 

accordance with our statutory duties contained in Public Law 108-106, as amended, 

which mandates the independent and objective conduct of audits relating to the programs 

and operations funded with amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to the Iraq 

Relief and Reconstruction Fund. Public Law 108-106, as amended, requires that we 

provide for the independent and objective leadership and coordination of, and 

recommendations on, policies designed to promote economy, efficiency, and 

effectiveness in the administration of such programs and operations and to prevent and 

detect waste, fraud, and abuse. 

This report does not contain recommendations; therefore no written response to this 

report is required. We appreciate the courtesies extended to the staff. For additional 

information on this report, please contact Mr. Clifton Spruill by email at 

clifton.spruill@iraq.centcom.mil or at (703) 343-8817, or Mr. Glenn Furbish by email at 

glenn.furbish@iraq.centcom.mil or at (703) 343-8817. For the report distribution, see 

Appendix M. 

Stuart W. Bowen, Jr. 

Inspector General 
i

Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction 

SIGIR-05-029 January 26, 2006 

 

Challenges Faced in Carrying Out Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund 

Activities 

Executive Summary 

This report discusses the challenges faced by the Department of State in directing and 

supervising Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund (IRRF) program activities. 

Introduction. On November 6, 2003 Congress appropriated $18.4 billion for relief and 

reconstruction activities in Iraq, and allocated the funds to specific sectors of Iraqi 

infrastructure and governance. The allocations were based on project lists prepared by 

the Coalition Provisional Authority in the summer of 2003. In June 2004, the CPA 

transferred power to a sovereign Iraqi government and the Department of State, through 

its U.S. Mission in Iraq, assumed the duties and responsibilities of the CPA. On October 

18, 2005, the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) Stuart W. 

Bowen, Jr. testified before the House Government Reform Subcommittee on National 

Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations. In this testimony, the Inspector 

General highlighted a growing area of concern—the reconstruction gap, or the difference 

between the number of projects that the United States originally proposed to build in Iraq 

and the number of projects that the Unites States will ultimately complete. This report 

discusses the scope and effect of this reconstruction gap. 

Objectives. The objectives of this audit were to determine (1) the effectiveness of U.S. 

agencies in carrying out plans for Iraq reconstruction activities, and (2) to identify the 

reasons, if any, for changes in the plans. 

Results. Although significant progress has been made in developing Iraq’s 

infrastructure, the United States will not complete all of the projects it originally planned 

to construct through its Iraq Relief and Reconstruction program. For example, only 49 of 

136 projects in the Water Resources and Sanitation sector will be completed, and only 

about 300 of 425 planned projects in the Electric sector will be completed. The 

completion of planned projects has been affected by a number of factors including: 

• dramatically increased spending for security needs 

• strategy changes as the Department of State has responded to the changing 

environment in Iraq 

• needed increases in spending for sustainment 

• the need to fund IRRF administrative expenses not considered in initial planning 

• plans made without a clear understanding of actual situational conditions 

Data are available on the impact of some, but not all, of these factors. For example, 

strategy changes have resulted in the reallocation of $5.6 billion dollars in IRRF monies 

from their originally planned purposes; the unbudgeted administrative costs of the IRRF 
ii

implementing agencies has resulted in $400.6 million in project changes; and unbudgeted 

sustainment costs have resulted in approximately $425 million in project changes, with 

another $350 million currently budgeted for additional sustainment activities. However, 

other factors, such as unforeseen security costs and unexpected conditions at many 

planned job sites, affected the projects but are less measurable. Table 1 shows changes 

between the CPA’s original November 2003 IRRF allocations, its allocations as of 

October 2005, and some indication of how these factors have cumulatively impacted U.S. 

plans. 

Table 1: Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Funding Allocation Changes 

November 2003 to October 2005 (Dollars in millions) 

Sectors Congressional 

Allocation 

November 2003 

Current 

Allocation 

October 2005 

Change 

in 

Dollars 

Percent 

Change 

Sectors with Increases

 Private Sector 

Development1

153.0 443.0 290.0 190% 

 --Iraq Debt Forgiveness No allocation 352.3 352.3 

Justice, Public Safety 

Infrastructure & Civil 

Society 

1,318.0 2,242.5 924.5 70.1% 

Security & Law 

Enforcement 

3,243.0 5,017.6 1,774.6 54.7% 

Education, Refugees & 

Human Rights 

280.0 363.0 83.0 29.6% 

Transportation & 

Telecommunication 

500.0 508.5 8.5 1.7% 

Administrative2 No allocation 213.0 213.0 0.0% 

Sectors with Decreases

Water Resources & 

Sanitation 

4,332.0 2,146.6 (2,185.4) (50.4%) 

Electric 5,560.0 4,309.8 (1,250.2) (22.5%) 

Oil Infrastructure 1,890.0 1,723.0 (167.0) (8.8%) 

Roads, Bridges & 

Construction 

370.0 333.7 (36.3) (9.8%) 

Health Care 793.0 786.0 (7.0) (<1.0%) 

Totals 18,439 18,439 (0.0) 0 

Source: SIGIR analysis of Department of State and Office of Management and Budget data. 1

In September 2004, Private Sector Development received $352.3 million for Iraq Debt Forgiveness. 

Because debt forgiveness is not a program, it has been reported separately to provide a clearer picture on 

how sector programs changed. 

2

An additional $601.3 million was used to cover FY2004 and 2005 operating expenses of the CPA and its 

successor, and the implementation costs of the implementing agencies. These costs are not identified and 

are spread across the sectors. Total FY2004-2005 administrative costs are actually $785.3 million. 
iii

The Iraq reconstruction programs have shown tangible results; however, the large-scale 

program changes mean that some of the original goals will not be fully achieved in some 

sectors. As shown in Table 1, the Water Resources and Sanitation sector and the Electric 

sector incurred the largest reduction of funds. How this funding reduction affects the 

sectors’ original plans is not entirely certain, however, because the CPA established 

broad sector goals and did not link individual projects to these goals. Moreover, there 

was a lack of detailed and accurate data on the actual status of some sectors before the 

start of reconstruction activity. 

For example, a recent Government Accountability Office report on progress in the Water 

sector reported that the original CPA program planners did not have good data on the 

number of Iraqis with access to water before the war.1 Similarly, Electric sector officials 

recently acknowledged that the CPA underestimated the decrepit state of Iraq’s electric 

infrastructure before the war. In responding to the Government Accountability Office’s 

report, the Department of State acknowledged its lack of metrics and responded that it 

was in the process of refining performance metrics in the water sector and in all other 

sectors. Because the Department of State was still working on this issue at the time of 

our audit, we focused our review on information in the Office of Management and 

Budget’s and Department of State’s Section 2207 Reports and interviews with sector 

officials. For the two sectors with the largest change, Water and Electric, we identified 

the following changes: 

• Water Resources and Sanitation—about 60% of the originally planned water 

resource and sanitation sector projects were not implemented. Potable water 

projects and water pumping stations and generators retained the largest number of 

projects, while the sewerage sub-sector; the irrigation and drainage sub-sector; the 

major irrigation sub-sector; and the dams sub-sector had most of their projects 

terminated. Nonetheless, the Department of State currently reports that Iraq’s 

water treatment capacity will be increased by 2.25 million cubic meters per day. 

• Electric—The CPA originally planned for about 425 projects in the Electric 

sector, and will complete approximately 300. The largest change will occur in the 

generation sub-sector, which will only add about 2,109 megawatts of additional 

power rather than the originally planned 3,400 megawatts. 

Additional analyses of how the original ten sectors and 67 sub-sectors have changed are 

in Appendices B through K of this report. 

 

This report contains no recommendations because the Department of State is developing 

or refining metrics for all sectors in response to the Government Accountability Office’s 

report on the Water Resources and Sanitation sector. 

 

1

 Rebuilding Iraq: U.S. Water and Sanitation Efforts Need Improved Measures for Assessing Impact and 

Sustained Resources for Maintaining Facilities; GAO-05-872, (Sep. 7, 2005). 
Table of Contents 

Executive Summary i 

Introduction 

Background 1 

Objectives 2 

Findings 

Challenges in Implementing the IRRF Program 3 

Measures for Determining Project Impact 10 

Appendixes 

A. Scope and Methodology 11 

B. Security and Law Enforcement Sector 12 

C. Justice, Public Safety Infrastructure and Civil Society Sector 15 

D. Electric Sector 18 

E. Oil Infrastructure Sector 20 

F. Water Resources and Sanitation Sector 21 

G. Transportation and Communications Sector 24 

H. Roads, Bridges, and Construction Sector 26 

I. Health Care Sector 27 

J. Private Sector Development Sector 28 

K. Education, Refugees, Human Rights, and Governance Sector 29 

L. Acronyms 31 

M. Report Distribution 32 

N. Audit Team Members 34 
1

Introduction 

Background 

On November 6, 2003, Congress enacted Public Law 108-106, the Emergency 

Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense and for the Reconstruction of Iraq and 

Afghanistan and appropriated a total of $18.649 billion. An appropriation of $18.439 

billion was for security, relief, rehabilitation, and reconstruction in Iraq, and $210 million 

was designated for assistance for Jordan, Liberia, and Sudan. The appropriation to Iraq, 

known as the Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund (IRRF), was allocated among 10 

sectors of Iraqi infrastructure and governance. According to a Congressional report,2 the 

provision of basic services, such as electricity, clean water, sewage treatment and 

disposal is urgently needed to give Iraqis hope for a better future. 

From May 2003 to June 2004, the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA), led by the 

United States and the United Kingdom, was the UN-recognized coalition authority that 

was responsible for the temporary governance of Iraq and for overseeing, directing, and 

coordinating the reconstruction effort. On June 28, 2004, the CPA disbanded and 

transferred power to a sovereign Iraqi government. When the CPA terminated, 

responsibility for the direction, coordination and supervision of all assistance for Iraq 

shifted to the U.S. Chief of Mission in Iraq, under the guidance of the Secretary of State. 

Section 2207 of Public Law 108-106 requires the Director of the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB), in consultation with the Administrator of the CPA, to submit a 

quarterly report to the Senate and House Committees on Appropriations, on the initial 

obligation of IRRF funds on a project-by-project basis, the distribution of duties and 

responsibilities regarding IRRF projects among the agencies of the U.S. government, 

funds provided by foreign governments and international organizations, and revenues 

from seized or frozen foreign assets. The Office of Management and Budget prepared 

these reports from January 2004 through July 2004. The U.S. Mission in Iraq, through its 

Iraq Reconstruction Management Office, has prepared the reports since October 2004. 

Department of State (DoS) Program Responsibilities.

The U.S. Ambassador to Iraq is the DoS’s Chief of the U.S. Mission in Iraq and is 

responsible for the continuous supervision and general direction of all assistance for Iraq 

according to National Security Presidential Directive 36, United States Government 

Operations in Iraq, May 11, 2004. This includes the direction, coordination, and 

supervision of all United States government employees, policies, and activities in 

country, except those under the command of an area military commander. The DoS’s 

activities to rebuild Iraq are primarily funded through the Iraq Relief and Reconstruction 

Fund as codified in Public Law 108-11 and Public Law 108-106. 

 

2

 House Committee on Appropriations Report 108-312, dated October 14, 2003. 
2

 

Funding by Sector. Congress allocated the funds based in part on a request developed 

by the CPA. The funds were allocated among 10 sectors. The sectors and their 

allocations are shown below as a percent of the total IRRF allocation. Appendices B 

through K identify the allocations to the sub-sectors. 

Figure 1: November 2003 Funding Allocations by IRRF Sector

18%

7%

10% 31%

23%

11%

Security & Law

Enforcement

Justice & Public

Safety

Electric

Oil

Water &

Sanitation

Other

Source: Office of Management and Budget and Department of State Section 2207 Reports

Although Public Law 108-106 allocated specific amounts to the 10 designated sectors of 

spending, it authorized the President to reallocate up to 10 percent of any of the 

allocations subject to the proviso that the total for the sector receiving such funds could 

not be increased by more than 20 percent. However, it also allowed one sector to be 

increased by an additional 20 percent in the event of unforeseen or emergency situations. 

Objectives

The objectives of this audit were to determine (1) the effectiveness of U.S. agencies in 

carrying out plans for Iraq reconstruction activities, and (2) to identify the reasons, if any, 

for changes in the plans. 
3

Challenges in Implementing the IRRF Program 

The United States faced significant challenges in planning and carrying out 

reconstruction activities in Iraq as evidenced by the large amounts of money that were 

reallocated between and within the various project sectors. The biggest change is 

reallocation to support development of Iraq’s security forces. DoS officials have reported 

that the original CPA planners envisioned a much more permissive security environment 

than that experienced in 2004 and 2005. The Iraq insurgency has directly affected the 

cost of reconstruction projects, increased the cost of materials, and created project delays. 

Security problems alone, however, are not responsible for all of the challenges DoS is 

facing in its reconstruction program. Other unforeseen problems, such as initial plans 

that were hurriedly put together with little knowledge of actual conditions at proposed 

project sites, needed increases in spending for sustainment, and the need to fund the 

administrative expenses of the IRRF implementing agencies and the U.S. Mission in Iraq 

have also utilized funds intended for projects. Both Congress and the Office of 

Management and Budget were well aware that the original slate of projects was likely to 

change. Congress gave the President the authority to reallocate money between sectors, 

and in each of its Section 2207 Reports to the Congress, the Administration has 

emphasized the need to maintain flexibility in its reconstruction plans. 

Security Costs Have Been Higher Than Anticipated

The cost of providing security for IRRF projects has been a significant contributor to 

program change, increasing costs by an estimated 9 percent over original budget 

estimates, to approximately 16 to 22 percent. The U.S. Agency for International 

Development and the Project and Contracting Office, two of the project implementing 

agencies, report that intimidation of local workers has delayed projects, while the 

insecure environment has driven away critically needed foreign technicians in the 

essential services sectors. As a result, security costs for private security forces protecting 

construction sites, workers, and convoys have increased dramatically, thereby 

significantly adding to reconstruction overhead costs. 

While some projects have no security costs, others have significant costs. According to 

DoS, when the program was developed in 2003, the security environment in Iraq was 

much more permissive than that experienced in 2004 and 2005. DoS officials report that 

the CPA’s original planning was based on the 2003 environment and thus assumed a 

much more permissive security environment; that is construction activities could be 

undertaken largely without interference from insurgent attacks on the facilities or 

intimidation of workers or authorities by insurgents. 

While the cost of security depends upon the project type, location, and who is doing the 

work, the original budgeted cost for security was set at a nominal 8 percent to 13 percent 

of project estimates for large design-build projects. Because of the increase in insurgency 

activities, contractors have had to include better site protection, hardened vehicles for 

personnel transportation and trained security teams with special communications 

capability. In a May report, DoS stated that of $9 billion allocated to the Project and 

Contracting Office for construction activities, approximately $2 billion has been forecast 

as attributable to costs associated with security, or 22 percent. Of this $2 billion, direct 

costs were estimated at $1.46 billion (16 percent) and additional costs (the rework of 

damaged facilities, replacement of damaged materials, and construction delays) added an 

additional $.56 billion (6 percent). 
4

Strategy Changes Have Had a Large Impact on Iraq Plans 

The biggest change in IRRF plans has been the result of strategy changes as the CPA and 

its DoS successor responded to the changing Iraq environment. Altogether, we estimate 

that the CPA and DoS have reallocated $5.6 billion in IRRF funding (30 percent of total 

IRRF dollars) between sectors in response to changing strategies and priorities as of 

September 30, 2005. The largest of these changes, known as the IRRF Strategic 

Spending Review, occurred in late summer of 2004 and reallocated $3.46 billion between 

the sectors. Reallocations occurred both between sectors and within sectors, and 

reallocations occurred frequently. For example, we identified 185 separate funding 

reallocations between January 2004 and October 2005. 

As we were preparing this report Ambassador Khalilzad, the current U.S. Ambassador to 

Iraq, designated an additional $1 billion in IRRF funding to be held back to support DoS 

priorities as well as projects of the new Iraqi government. This report does not analyze or 

discuss this latest change in strategy. 

IRRF Strategic Spending Review. As stated earlier, the CPA terminated on June 28, 

2004, and IRRF program direction and supervision shifted to the U.S. Mission in Iraq 

under Ambassador Negroponte. Almost immediately, the Ambassador initiated an 

examination of the priorities and programs funded by the IRRF. According to DoS’s 

October 2004 Section 2207 Report, the review was conducted in close consultation with 

the Iraqi government, and all U.S. government implementing agencies. The objective 

was to re-prioritize funding from projects that would not begin until mid to late 2005, and 

use those funds to target key high-impact projects, which would in turn support longerterm reconstruction efforts. The result was a plan to reallocate $3.46 billion between 

sectors, focusing on improving security, increasing Iraqi employment, and supporting 

democratic transition in Iraq. This plan was announced to Congress on September 14, 

2004. 

Table 2 shows the changes resulting from the strategic review. As shown, the Security 

and Law Enforcement sector received the largest increase, with the Electric and the 

Water Resources and Sanitation sectors providing all of the funds. 
5

Table 2: Summary of Changes to Sector Allocations as a Result of the July 2004 IRRF Strategic 

Spending Plan Review (Dollars in millions)

Sector July 2004 

Allocation 

Increase Decrease October 2004 

Allocation 

Security & Law Enforcement $3,235.0 $1,809.6 $5,044.6 

Justice, Public Safety 

Infrastructure, & Civil Society 

1,484.0 460.5 1,944.5 

Electric 5,464.5 (1,074.6) 4,390.0 

Oil Infrastructure1 1,701.0 450.0 (450.0) 1,701.0 

Water Resources & Sanitation 4,246.5 (1,935.6) 2,310.9 

Transportation & 

Telecommunications 

499.5 499.5 

Roads, Bridges & Construction 367.5 367.5 

Health Care 786.0 786.0 

Private Sector Development2 183.0 660.0 843.0 

Education, Refugees, Human 

Rights, Democracy & 

Governance 

259.0 80.0 339.0 

Administrative 213.0 213.0 

Total $18,439.0 $3,460.1 $(3,460.1) $18,439.0 

Source: DoS Section 2207 Report, October 5, 2004. 

1

 The strategic review moved $450 million between two project lines within the oil sector. As a result there 

is no net change in the amount of IRRF funds dedicated to the oil sector. 2

 This includes $352.3 million for Iraq Debt Forgiveness. 

Other Strategy Changes Reallocated $2.1 Billion. Since January 2004 Congress has 

received eight quarterly reports on the planned use of funds made available for Iraq 

Relief and Reconstruction activities. In total, these reports have identified $2.128 billion 

in IRRF fund reallocations as a result of strategy changes that are in addition to the 

$3.460 billion discussed above. These reallocations were made from the earliest days of 

the IRRF reconstruction activity, with $857 million moving between sectors between the 

time Congress enacted Public Law 108-106 on November 6, 2003, and the Office of 

Management and Budget’s first Section 2207 Report in January 2004. Other changes 

occurred regularly thereafter with the second largest reallocation, $504 million, occurring 

in December 2004 when DoS reallocated IRRF funds to address near-term needs of the 

Electric sector and to expedite delivery of essential services to four key post-battle cities. 

Table 3 shows the amounts reallocated as reported in the Section 2207 quarterly reports. 

As stated, these reallocations are in addition to the $3.46 billion reallocated by the IRRF 

Strategic Spending Plan Review. 
6

Table3: IRRF Fund Reallocations as a Result of Strategy Changes 

Section 2207 Report Amounts Reallocated 

as a Result of Strategy Changes 

January 2004 $857 million 

April 2004 $179 million 

July 2004 $42 million 

October 2004 $50 million 

January 2005 $504 million 

April 2005 $356.5 million 

July 2005 $76.5 million 

October 2005 $63 million 

Total $2,128 million 

Source: OMB and DoS Section 2207 Reports. 

Reconstruction Priorities Changed Frequently. The reallocation of the $5.6 billion in 

IRRF funding ($3.460 billion in the IRRF Strategic Spending Plan Review and $2.128 

billion in additional changes) was accomplished through 185 separate sub-sector funding 

changes, further illustrating the frequent changes under which the reconstruction 

programs operated. In the October 2005 Section 2207 Report, we identified 67 subsectors within the original 10 sectors, of which 11 were new sub-sectors that had been 

added since January 2004. Of the remaining 56 sub-sector, 18 (32 percent) had 

experienced cumulative funding changes (increases or decreases) greater than 50 percent 

of their original allocation. Eight additional sub-sectors (14 percent) had cumulative 

funding changes (increases or decreases) greater than 25 percent of their original 

allocation. 

As shown in Table 4 below, the Private Sector Development sector received the largest 

percentage increase (190 percent) growing from $153 million to $443 million. The sector 

also received $352.2 million to pay for the budget costs of forgiving approximately $4 

billion in bilateral debt that Iraq owes the U.S. Because debt forgiveness is not a Private 

Sector Development program, we have reported it separately to provide a clearer picture 

of the changes in that sector’s programs. The Security and Law Enforcement sector 

received the largest dollar increase, gaining $1.775 billion. The Justice, Public Safety, 

and Civil Society sector received the second largest percentage increase (70.1 percent) 

and the second largest increase in dollars of nearly $925 million. 

Sectors that incurred the biggest decreases were the Water Resources and Sanitation 

sector which was reduced from $4.3 billion to $2.1 billion (-50.4 percent), and the 

Electric sector, which was reduced from $5.560 billion to $4.309 billion (-22.5 percent). 
7

Table 4: Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Funding Allocation Changes 

November 2003 to October 2005 (Dollars in millions) 

Sectors Congressional 

Allocation 

November 2003 

Current 

Allocation 

October 2005 

Change 

in 

Dollars 

Percent 

Change 

Sectors with increases

Private Sector Development1 153.0 443.0 290.0 190.0%

 --Iraq Debt Forgiveness No allocation 352.3 352.3 

Justice, Public Safety 

Infrastructure, & Civil 

Society 

1,318.0 2,242.5 924.5 70.1%

Security & Law 

Enforcement 

3,243.0 5,017.6 1,774.6 54.7%

Education, Refugees & 

Human Rights 

280.0 363.0 83.0 29.6%

Transportation & 

Telecommunication 

500.0 508.5 8.5 1.7%

Administrative2 No allocation 213.0 213.0 0.0%

Sectors with decreases

Water Resources & 

Sanitation 

$4,332.0 $2,146.6 $(2,185.4) (50.4%)

Electric 5,560.0 4,309.8 (1,250.2) (22.5%)

Oil Infrastructure 1,890.0 1,723.0 (167.0) (8.8%)

Roads, Bridges & 

Construction 

370.0 333.7 (36.3) (9.8%)

Health Care 793.0 786.0 (7.0) (<1.0%)

Totals $18,439 $18,439 $(0.0) 0

Source: OMB and DoS Section 2207 Reports. 

1

In September 2004, Private Sector Development received $352.3 million for Iraq Debt Forgiveness. 

Because debt forgiveness is not an actual program, we have reported it separately to provide a clearer 

picture on how the sector changed. 

2

An additional $601.3 million was used to cover FY2004 and 2005 program implementation costs and the 

FY2005 operating expenses of CPA’s successor organization. These costs are not identified and are spread 

across the sectors. Total FY2004-2005 administrative costs are actually $785.7 million. 

The Need for Large-Scale Sustainment Activities Was Not 

Foreseen. 

In the October 30, 2005, SIGIR Quarterly Report to Congress, we discussed sustainment, 

or the ability of the Iraqi government to support IRRF-funded projects and facilities for 

an extended period of time after U.S. financial, managerial, and technical assistance is 

terminated. That report pointed out that the need to sustain projects after turnover to the 

Government of Iraq was largely unforeseen and activities to develop the capacity of the 

Iraqi government to support and budget for sustaining projects had not been included in 

the CPA’s reconstruction plans. DoS had identified the problem, and two of its 

implementing agencies, the Project and Contracting Office and the U.S. Agency for 

International Development, had taken steps to prepare their projects for turnover to the 
8

Iraqi government. At the time of our report, the two implementing agencies reported that 

they reallocated a combined $425 million for sustainment and capacity building 

activities. Additionally, DoS budget officials identified an additional $350 million in 

IRRF funds that could be used to pay for sustainment activities. According to a DoS 

budget official, as of January 9, 2006, the additional sustainment funds have been 

committed and are awaiting contract action. 

Some IRRF Administrative Expenses Were Not Considered in 

Initial Plans

Altogether, $785.3 million in IRRF funding has been used to cover the administrative 

costs of the agencies implementing the IRRF program, and the operating expenses of the 

CPA and its successor organization. The use of these funds is authorized by the FY 2004 

Supplement Appropriations Act. However, CPA planners did not factor $400.6 million 

of these costs into their program and project plans. Consequently, the use of these funds 

has reduced the level of funding that can be provided for specific relief and 

reconstruction activities in Iraq, and altered U.S. plans. 

The FY 2004 Supplemental Appropriations Act allowed agencies, other than the CPA, 

who are managing or administering IRRF funds, to use “up to 10 percent” of those funds 

to pay for administrative expenses, and allowed the CPA to take up to 1 percent of the 

appropriation to cover its operating expenses. In April 2004, the Office of Management 

and Budget (the agency writing the Section 2207 Report at the time) reported that it 

would be using this authority, and in July 2004 reported that $290.4 million in IRRF 

funds would be used to cover fiscal year 2004 expenses of the five agencies 

implementing the IRRF. The Office of Management and Budget also reported that an 

additional $184 million in IRRF funds would be used to cover the FY 2004 operating 

expenses of the CPA. In October 2004, DoS reported on how it intended to fund FY 

2005 expenses. According to the report, $94.3 million in IRRF funds would be used to 

cover the administrative expenses of three of the implementing agencies, and $184 

million in IRRF funds would be allocated to cover the operating expenses of the 

successor to the CPA. Finally, in July 2005 AID revised its security costs and received 

an additional $32.6 million in IRRF funds. Thus, in Fiscal Years 2004 and 2005, $785.3 

million was allocated for IRRF administrative and operating expenses. 

While the law permits IRRF funds to be used for administrative and operating expenses, 

$400.6 million of these expenses, comprised of the $184 million in FT2004 operating 

expenses, the $184 million in FY2005 operating expenses, and the $32.6 million 

transferred to USAID in July 2005, were not considered in developing the original 

September 2003 list of IRRF projects. According to the April 2004 Section 2207 Report, 

taking this money will “reduce slightly the level of funding that CPA and its successor 

can provide for specific relief and reconstruction projects in Iraq.” The specific sectors 

and sub-sectors that lost funding in FY2004 are identified in the July 2004 Section 2207 

Report. The sectors and sub-sectors that lost funding to cover the FY 2005 

administrative and operating expenses, however, are not identified in the October 2004 

report. Instead, a DoS official told us the implementing agencies were permitted to 

allocate their share of the administrative expenses across their sectors and sub-sectors 

without identifying which sub-sectors lost money. 
9

Initial Plans Were Imprecise

The April 2005 Section 2207 Report states that the CPA had significantly underestimated

the damage done to the basic infrastructure from decades of neglect and warfare and, as a 

result, more time and resources are required to stand-up and maintain systems than 

originally thought. The state of Iraq’s infrastructure was further degraded by looting and 

sabotage following the war. One DoS sector advisor told us that the original CPA 

assessments had under-estimated the decrepit state of Iraq’s infrastructure and 

overestimated the management capabilities of the Iraqi ministries. Obtaining more 

accurate information, however, would have been difficult prior to the end of combat 

operations. While we could not precisely determine costs associated with planning 

difficulties, the Section 2207 Reports contain numerous citations about unforeseen 

changes. Examples include: 

• A port rehabilitation project in Umm Qasr had to spend money that was planned 

for other work on critical structural and pier side repairs of berths as a precursor 

to conducting dredging operations. 

• The discovery of unexploded ordnance at Tallil Military Base prolonged the site 

preparation and construction there. 

• Facilities planned to serve as headquarters for the Council of Judges, the Court of 

Cassation, and the Central Criminal Court of Iraq were deemed inappropriate due 

to ownership problems. 

• After completing initial inspection of nearly half of the schools in nine provinces, 

the Ministry of Education revised its estimate of the number of schools needing 

rehabilitation from 930 to 1,047. 
10

Measures for Determining Project Impact 

The United State’s reconstruction efforts have shown tangible results in improving the 

Iraqi infrastructure. However, the significant funding change means that many of the 

originally planned projects will not be completed. The biggest change will occur in two 

sectors; Water Resources and Sanitation, and Electric, which had funding reductions of 

50 and 22 percent respectively. A precise measure of how these funding reductions 

affected the sectors’ original goals is unavailable, however, because the CPA established 

broad goals for the sector, but did not link the individual projects to these goals. 

Moreover, there is a lack of detailed and accurate baseline data on the actual status of 

these sectors prior to the start of reconstruction activity. The lack of detailed and 

accurate data was identified in a recent Government Accountability Office report on 

progress in the Water sector that reported that program planners did not have good data 

on the number of Iraqis with access to water before the war.3 Similarly, a recent Electric 

sector report stated that the CPA underestimated the decrepit state of Iraq’s electric 

infrastructure prior to the war. In responding to the Government Accountability Office’s 

report, DoS acknowledged the lack of metrics and responded that it was in the process of 

refining performance metrics in the Water Resources and Sanitation sector and in all 

other sectors. 

As a result, we will not be making a recommendation to establish or refine program 

metrics. Since at the time of this audit DoS was still working on this issue, we focused 

our review on information in OMB and DoS’s Section 2207 Reports and interviews with 

key sector officials. For the two sectors with the largest change, Water Resources and 

Sanitation and Electric, we identified the following changes: 

• Water Resources and Sanitation—about sixty percent of the originally planned 

water sector projects will not be completed. The potable water sub-sector and 

water pumping stations and generators sub-sector retained the largest number of 

projects, while the sewerage sub-sector, the irrigation and drainage sub-sector, the 

major irrigation sub-sector, and the dams sub-sector had most of their projects 

cancelled. Nonetheless, DoS reports that Iraq’s water treatment capacity will be 

increased by 2.25 million cubic meters per day. 

• Electric—DoS originally planned about 425 projects in the electric sector, and 

will complete approximately 300. The largest change will occur in the generation 

sub-sector, which will only add about 2,109 megawatts of additional power rather 

than the originally planned 3,400 megawatts. 

For additional analyses of how the original ten sectors and sub-sectors have changed, see 

Appendices B through K. 

 

3

 Rebuilding Iraq: U.S. Water and Sanitation Efforts Need Improved Measures for Assessing Impact and 

Sustained Resources for Maintaining Facilities; GAO-05-872, (Sep. 7, 2005). 
11

Appendix A. Scope and Methodology__________

We initiated this audit in October 2005 (Project No. SIGIR-2005-23). To determine the 

effectiveness of U.S. agencies in carrying out plans for Iraq reconstruction activities, we 

reviewed reports submitted to meet the requirements of Section 2207 of Public Law 108-

106. These reports, which have been submitted every three months since January 2004, 

identify ten sectors of Iraqi infrastructure and governance, and identify how Iraq Relief 

and Reconstruction Funds (IRRF) have been allocated between those sectors. The 

reports also identify any changes that have occurred in a sector’s allocation since the 

previous quarter. We tracked these changes for a two year period to determine how funds 

moved between the sectors, and to identify, where possible, the reasons for the changes. 

We then identified the primary reasons for the changes, and aggregated the amount of 

funding moved for each of the primary reasons we had identified. 

To identify reasons for changes in U.S. plans, we also reviewed the Section 2207 

Reports. In the body of the Section 2207 Reports, reasons were generally given as to why 

funding changes were made. In our research to identify how and where funding moved 

to satisfy objective one of this report, we identified the sub-sectors that incurred funding 

changes greater than 25 percent. For each sub-sector with a change greater than 25 

percent, we then looked up reasons for the change and summarized it for the report. 

We conducted this audit between October 2005 and January 2006, in accordance with 

generally accepted government auditing standards. 

Use of Computer-Processed Data. We did not use computer-processed data to perform 

this audit. 

Prior Coverage. 

SIGIR. SIGIR reported on October 24, 2005, in “Managing Sustainment for Iraq Relief 

and Reconstruction Fund Programs” (SIGIR-05-022), that progress had been made in 

identifying the challenges of sustaining the IRRF projects. However, there is a growing 

recognition that the Iraqi government is not yet prepared to take over the near- or longterm management and funding infrastructure developed through the IRRF projects. We 

reported that we believe progress has been hampered by the absence of a centralized 

sustainment office with the authority and responsibility to manage this effort across the 

jurisdictional boundaries of the operating agency organizations. We identified the Iraq 

Reconstruction Management Office as the primary DoS entity involved in managing 

IRRF projects and deemed it responsible for coordinating sustainment. We made several 

recommendations that direction be provided for a common sustainment vision and to plan 

and manage sustainment activities. 

Government Accountability Office. Rebuilding Iraq: U.S. Water and Sanitation 

Efforts Need Improved Measures for Assessing Impact and Sustained Resources for 

Maintaining Facilities; GAO-05-872, (Sep. 7, 2005). 
12

Appendix B. Security and Law Enforcement 

Sector 

The Security and Law Enforcement Sector Increased by $1.775 Billion, or 54.7 Percent. 

Table5: Security and Law Enforcement Funding Allocation Changes 

 November 2003 to October 2005 (Millions of Dollars) 

Congressional 

Allocation 

November 2003 

Allocation as of 

October 2005 

Change Percent change 

Security & Law 

Enforcement 

$3,243.0 $5,017.6 $1,774.6 54.7%

Police Training & 

Technical Assistance 

950.0 1,808.4 858.4 90.4%

Border Enforcement 150.0 436.8 286.8 191.2%

 Facilities Protection 67.0 53.0 (14.0) (20.9%)

Iraqi Armed Forces 

Facilities 

745.0 730.8 (14.2) (1.9%)

Iraqi Armed Forces 

Equipment 

879.0 628.6 (250.4) (28.5%)

 Iraqi Armed Forces 

Operations & Training 

375.0 429.3 54.3 14.5%

Iraqi National Guard 

Operations and 

Personnel 

58.0 224.6 166.6 287.2%

Iraqi National Guard 

Equipment 

17.0 91.6 74.6 438.8%

Iraqi National Guard 

Facilities 

Not identified 358.5 358.5 0.0%

Iraqi Security Forces 

Quick Response 

Program 

Not identified 170.0 170.0 0.0%

Commander’s 

Humanitarian Relief & 

Reconstruction Program 

Not identified 86.0 86.0 0.0%

Source: OMB and DoS Section 2207 Reports. 

The Security and Law Enforcement sector funds the establishment of trained Iraqi 

security forces under firm civilian control and imbued with respect for political and 

human rights. In terms of the funds available for sector activities, Security and Law 

Enforcement originally ranked third behind the Electric and Water Resources and 

Sanitation sectors. However, after two years the Security and Law Enforcement sector is 

now the largest sector, increasing by approximately $1.8 billion over its original 

allocation (an increase of about 54.7 percent). Moreover, Security and Law Enforcement 

activities also received a $5.7 billion appropriation through Public Law 109-13 to fund 

the provision of equipment, supplies, services, training, facility and infrastructure repair, 

renovation, and construction for Iraqi security forces, further illustrating the growing 

priority of U.S. projects and activities in this sector.4 The Department of Defense controls 

this appropriation, known as the Iraq Security Forces Fund. 

 

4

 Public Law 109-13 Iraqi Security Forces Fund, (May 2005). 
13

As shown in Table 5, there are eleven sub-sectors in this sector. Of these eleven subsectors, five had funding changes greater than 25 percent of their original allocation. The 

three sub-sectors that make up the Iraqi National Guard program registered the largest 

percentage increases, growing by a combined 800 percent (from $75 million to $600 

million), while two of the sub-sectors in the police training program registered the largest 

dollar increases, increasing by about $1.145 billion. The Iraqi Armed Forces decreased 

by $211 million, although only one sub-sector, Iraqi Armed Forces Equipment, decreased 

by more than 25 percent. This decrease probably reflects the additional funding made 

available through the Iraq Security Forces Fund rather than any lessening in priority. 

Finally, two new sub-sectors were established, the Iraqi Security Forces Quick Response 

Program sub-sector in July 2005, and the Commander’s Humanitarian Relief and 

Reconstruction Program sub-sector in October 2005. Both sub-sectors were created to 

provide a means to rapidly respond to emergent requirements. 

DoS’s broad goal in this sector was to establish four security organizations: the Iraqi 

Police Services, Border Police Services, the Facilities Protection Service, and the Iraqi 

Civil Defense Corps, and to establish the new Iraqi Army to provide for the legitimate 

territorial defense of Iraq. As of October 2005, DoS was reporting that both the Ministry 

of Defense and the Ministry of Interior have made substantial progress in developing 

their security forces, but continue to experience problems with their institutional 

capability to support fielded forces. 

Sub-sectors That Changed by More Than 25 Percent

Police Training Increased $858.4 Million, or 90.4 Percent. The Police Training subsector increased by $858.4 million or 90.4 percent. Creating a safe and secure 

environment is vital for the success of Iraq’s reconstruction, and rebuilding the Iraqi 

police force is an important part of this goal. Some of the major changes in this subsector were (1) a decision to provide training and equipment for an additional 45,000 

police (bringing the total number of trained Iraqi Police Service personnel to 135,000); 

(2) supporting construction and/or repair of over 650 police station facilities; (3) the 

creation of a Civil Intervention Force, a specialized organization designed to provide a 

national-level, high-end, rapid-response capability to counter large-scale civil 

disobedience and insurgency activities and the construction of nine bases to support the 

force; and (4) a decision to consolidate funding for construction of training academies 

and training equipment for the Iraqi Police Service, the Department of Border 

Enforcement, and the Facilities Protection Service in this line. A decision was also made 

to provide specialized police training (counter-terrorism, criminal investigations, 

intelligence, etc.) at a specialized training center in Baghdad. 

Border Enforcement Increased by $286.8 Million, or 191.2 Percent. The Border 

Enforcement sub-sector increased by $286.8 million, or 191.2 percent. Some of the 

major changes in this sub-sector were (1) a decision to train and equip an additional 

16,000 Border Enforcement personnel including border police, customs police, and 

immigration officials; and (2) the construction of 99 border forts and corresponding 

access roads as well as other border enforcement infrastructure such as regional training 

bases and their operating costs; and (3) the purchase of basic technology for control and 

screening at major ports of entry, including items such as x-rays, metal detectors, and 

grid sensors. 

Iraqi Armed Forces Equipment Decreased by $250.4 Million, or 28.5 Percent. The 

Iraqi Armed Forces Equipment sub-sector incurred a funding decrease of $250.4 million, 
14

or 28.5 percent of its original allocation. However, the Section 2207 reports do not 

identify any changes in plan as a result of the reallocation. Again, we believe that no 

effects are identified because of the availability of the $5.7 billion Iraq Security Forces 

Fund. 

Iraqi National Guard Operations and Personnel Increased by $166.6 Million, or 

287.2 Percent. The Iraqi National Guard Operations and Personnel sub-sector had a 

funding increase of $166.6 million, or a 287.2 percent increase over its original 

allocation. The Iraqi National Guard, originally named the Iraqi Civil Defense Corps, is 

a constabulary force to assist coalition forces in bringing stability to Iraq. In conjunction 

with coalition forces, the Guard will conduct foot patrols, search for remnants of the 

former regime, and perform other civic duties. The increase is primarily attributable to a 

decision to increase the size of the force. The CPA’s original plan called for creating 18 

National Guard battalions. However, the plan underwent two major changes. In January 

2004 a decision was made to create 36 battalions, and in October 2004, following 

Ambassador Negroponte’s Strategic Review of IRRF spending, a decision was made to 

add an additional 20 battalions along with a National Guard Division and Brigade 

headquarters. 

Iraqi National Guard Equipment Increased by $74.6 Million, or 438.8 Percent. 

The Iraqi National Guard Equipment sub-sector increased by $74.6 million, or 438.8 

percent. The large scale increase in the size of the Iraqi National Guard created a 

commensurate increase in equipment costs. 

Iraqi National Guard Facilities Was Established as a New Sub-sector. DoS did not 

identify Iraqi National Guard facilities as a separate sub-sector in its original plan. 

Rather, funding for the support of Guard facilities was identified as part of the operations 

and personnel program. As plans to increase the size of Guard force developed, a 

decision was made in October 2004 to construct supporting facilities. National Guard 

Facilities was established as a separate sub-sector, and $358.5 million was made available 

for the sub-sector. 

Iraqi Security Forces Quick Response Program Was Established as a New Subsector. The Iraqi Security Forces Quick Response sub-sector was established in July 

2004 to allow the Multi-National Security Transition Command-Iraq to respond to 

emerging requirements, including force protection, facilities repair, communications 

equipment, and other needs of the various Iraqi security forces. The July 2004 report 

allocated $40 million for the sub-sector, and in October 2004 and January 2005 an 

additional $130 million was added. 

Commander’s Humanitarian Relief and Reconstruction Program Was Established 

as a New Sub-sector. The Commander’s Humanitarian Relief and Reconstruction 

Program sub-sector was established in October 2004, to provide urgent, essential water 

and sewage services to Iraqi citizens with a primary focus on Baghdad. The sub-sector 

was funded at $86 million and remains unchanged. 
15

Appendix C. Justice, Public Safety 

Infrastructure, and Civil ,Society Sector 

The Justice, Public Safety Infrastructure, and Civil Society Sector Increased By $924.5 

Million, or 70.1 Percent. 

Table 6: Justice, Public Safety Infrastructure, and Civil Society Funding Allocation 

Changes November 2003 to October 2005 (Millions of Dollars) 

Congressional 

Allocation 

November 2003 

Current 

Allocation 

October 2005 

Change Percent change 

Justice, Public Safety, & 

Civil Society 

$1,318.0 $2,242.5 $924.5 70.1%

Other Technical 

Investigative Methods 

10.0 5.0 (5.0) (50.0%)

Witness Protection 

Program 

75.0 37.0 (38.0) (50.7%)

Penal Facilities 100.0 87.0 (13.0) (13.0%)

Reconstruction and 

Modernization of 

Detention Facilities 

109.0 165.0 56.0 51.4%

Facilities Protection, 

Mine Removal, Fire 

Service 

400.0 274.0 (126.0) (31.5%)

Public Safety Training 

and Facilities 

199.0 219.5 20.5 10.3%

National Security 

Communications 

Network 

90.0 106.5 16.5 18.3%

Rule of Law in Iraq Not identified 56.2 56.2 0.0%

Investigations of Crimes 

against Humanity 

75.0 128.0 53.0 70.7%

Judicial Security and 

Facilities 

150.0 159.0 9.0 6.0%

Democracy Building 

Activities 

100.0 995.3 895.3 895.3%

U.S. Institute for Peace 10.0 10.0 0 0.0%

Source: OMB and DoS Section 2207 Reports. 

The Justice, Public Safety Infrastructure, and Civil Society sector funds programs such as 

the protection of the judiciary, assistance for law enforcement personnel, and the 

reconstruction of penal institutions to international standards. The sector was initially the 

fourth largest in funding but has since moved ahead of Water Resources and Sanitation 

into third position. Overall, Justice, Public Safety and Civil Society sub-sectors have 

increased by $924.5 million or 70.1 percent over their original allocation. Almost all of 

this increase occurred in one sub-sector, Democracy Building Activities, which funds 

activities intended to establish the democratic foundations of a new Iraq. As shown in 
16

Table 6, there are 12 sub-sectors in this activity, of which 6 had funding changes greater 

than 25 percent of their original allocation. One new sub-sector, Rule of Law in Iraq, 

was added. 

Sub-sectors That Changed by More Than 25 Percent

Other Technical Investigative Methods Decreased by $5 Million, or 50 Percent. 

Other Technical Investigative Methods was funded at $10 million, but the CPA reduced 

sub-sector funding in January 2004 to $5 million. The sub-sector supports the use of 

technical measures, such as recording devices, to develop prosecutable cases against 

terrorists and organized crime members. The reduction in this sub-sector was reported in 

OMB’s first Section 2207 Report largely before program activity began. 

Witness Protection Program Sub-sector Decreased by $38 Million, or 50.7 Percent. 

The Witness Protection Program sub-sector lost approximately half of its funding, going 

from a $75 million sub-sector to a $37 million sub-sector. As with the Other Technical 

Investigative Methods sub-sector, the decision to reduce this sub-sector was made by the 

CPA in January 2004 before program activity began. The sub-sector supports the 

establishment of a witness protection program to allow victims as well as criminals who 

become government witnesses to testify without fear of being killed by the members of 

the organization against whom they are testifying. 

Reconstruction of Detention Facilities Increased by $56 Million, or 51.4 Percent. 

The Reconstruction of Detention Facilities sub-sector increased by $56 million or 51.4 

percent. Originally the plan was to reconstruct or modernize 25 adult facilities and one 

juvenile rehabilitation facility. This goal was later revised to provide for one large 

regional detention center instead of rehabilitating numerous facilities. Additionally, a 

decision was made to hire approximately 100 civilian contractors to serve as trainers and 

mentors for prison employees. 

Facilities Repair, Fire Service, and De-mining Decreased by $125 Million, or 31.5 

Percent. Congress provided $400 million for this sub-sector. Subsequently, $125 

million was transferred to other projects--a 31.5 percent decrease in funding. As with 

several other sub-sectors, the funds were reallocated by the CPA in January 2004, prior to 

program activity beginning. 

Rule of Law in Iraq Was Established as a New Sub-sector. The Rule of Law in Iraq 

sub-sector is a new $30 million sub-sector designed to provide rule of law training to 

judicial, prosecutorial, and attorney officials and staff, policy support for the Ministry of 

Justice and High Juridical Council, and assistance to increase public access to justice and 

legal assistance. 

Investigations of Crimes against Humanity Office Increased by $53 Million, or 70.7 

Percent. The Investigations of Crimes against Humanity sub-sector increased by $53 

million, or 70.7 percent. Assistance for investigations of crimes against humanity 

includes (1) bringing in and supporting international investigators; (2) evidence handling; 

(3) local capacity-building; (4) prosecutorial and judicial support; (5) forensic support 

through evidentiary exhumations of mass graves; and (6) infrastructure and security for 

the Iraqi Special Tribunal. The $53 million increase was needed to meet fiscal year 2005 

costs to complete exhumation of four mass gravesites that are linked to a certain set of 

defendants whom the Iraqi Special Tribunal is expected to bring to trial. 
17

Democracy Building Activities Increased by $895.3 Million, or 895 Percent. The 

Democracy Building Activities sub-sector had the largest percentage growth of any Iraq 

Relief and Reconstruction Fund sub-sector, growing by 895 percent, or $895.3 million. 

The sub-sector funds basic institutions essential to democracy such as assisting Iraq’s 

highly centralized ministries to make the transition to a more decentralized power-sharing 

system; supporting civil society building and national civic education programs; and 

establishing core procedures and processes for the Governing Council. Congress 

provided $100 million for this sub-sector. The CPA identified a need for additional 

funding almost immediately, adding $359 million in January 2004 alone. According to 

the January 2004 Section 2207 Report, the CPA and the Iraqi Governing Council agreed 

to accelerate the transition to full Iraqi sovereignty. This accelerated transition required 

an increased emphasis on activities such as democracy-building. Some of the additional 

money funded conflict mitigation activities which spur short-term employment activities; 

support the development of local and provincial government; electoral technical 

assistance to the Independent Election Commission of Iraq in preparation for Iraq’s 

Transitional National Assembly elections in January 2005; elections monitoring; and 

support for the Interim Government of Iraq. 
18

Appendix D. Electric Sector 

The Electric Sector Decreased by $1.250.2 Billion, or 22.5 Percent. 

Table 7: Electric Sector Funding Allocation Changes 

November 2003 to October 2005 (Millions of Dollars) 

Congressional 

Allocation 

November 2003 

Allocation as of 

October 2005 

Change Percent change 

Electric Sector $5,560.0 $4,309.8 $(1,250.2) (22.5%)

Generation 2,810.0 1,607.8 (1,202.2) (42.8%)

Transmission 1,550.0 1,241.6 (308.4) (19.9%)

Network Infrastructure 1,000.0 1,289.4 289.4 28.9%

Automated Monitoring 

& Control System 

150.0 127.0 (23.0) (15.3%)

Security 50.0 44.0 (6.0) (12.0%)

Source: OMB and DoS Section 2207 Reports. 

The Electric Sector funds new generation capacity, the rehabilitation of some existing 

generating units, and the reconstruction of most high-voltage transmission lines. 

Immediately following the war, the electrical power infrastructure of Iraq was in perilous 

condition. Early coalition efforts restored power generation to the same level as available 

before the war. However, the system is inadequate to meet Iraq’s growing demand and 

lacks any measure of reliability. Blackouts, unplanned outages and other failures 

continue to occur on a frequent basis. The Electric sector was originally the largest sector 

in terms of funding, but presently ranks second behind Security and Law Enforcement, 

having lost $1.25 billion in funding. As shown in Table 7, there are 4 sub-sectors in this 

sector: Generation, Transmission, Network Infrastructure, and Security. The majority of 

change in this sector occurred in the Generation sub-sector, which lost $1.2 billion. 

Sub-sectors That Changed by More Than 25 Percent

Generation Decreased by $1.2 Billion, or 42.8 Percent. The Generation sub-sector 

experienced the second largest funding decrease of all Iraq Relief and Reconstruction 

sub-sectors, losing $1.2 billion, or 42.8 percent of its original allocation. Initially, the 

U.S. goal was to create a system that could generate 6,000 megawatts of power daily; an 

increase of 3,400 megawatts. The plan entailed building 12 new generation plants that 

would produce an additional 1,685 megawatts of power, and 12 rehabilitation and 

maintenance projects that were expected to add an additional 1,144 megawatts. This was 

later reduced to a goal of increasing power generation by 2,109 megawatts instead of 

3,400 megawatts. This change, announced to Congress in September 2004, was part of 

Ambassador Negroponte’s Strategic IRRF Review whose objective was to re-prioritize 

funding from projects not beginning until mid to late 2005 and use these funds to target 

key high-impact projects, which would, in turn, support longer-term reconstruction 

efforts. The plan reallocated $1.046 billion from Generation. The cuts include four gas 

powered stations in Anbar, Basra, Al-Methane and Dados; a diesel power plant in 

Babylon; and Baja steam turbines 4 and 5 in Salah-Ad Din. 
19

Network Infrastructure Increased by 289.4 Million, or 28.9 Percent. The distribution 

network sub-sector was funded by Congress at $1.0 billion and received an additional 

$289.4 million in funding, a 28.9 percent increase. Distribution networks deliver power 

carried over the transmission networks to local areas. The distribution networks were 

relatively unaffected by the recent war but were in a highly deteriorated condition 

beforehand. Equipment is operating without adequate electrical protection and is 

generally overloaded. The distribution network program includes the construction of 

over 150 new or rehabilitated 33 kilovolt substations, and several hundred 11 kilovolt 

substations countrywide. The additional funding was principally added to support 

electrical distribution in Fallujah, Najaf, and Sadr City as part of a $246 million postbattle reconstruction initiative. 
20

Appendix E. Oil Infrastructure Sector 

The Oil Infrastructure Sector Decreased by $167 Million, or 8.8 Percent. 

Table 8: Oil Infrastructure Funding Allocation Changes 

November 2003 to October 2005 (Millions of Dollars) 

Congressional 

Allocation

November 2003 

Allocation as of

October 2005 

Change Percent change 

Oil Infrastructure $1,890.0 $1,723.0 $(167.0) (8.8%) 

 Infrastructure 1,200.0 1,697.0 497.0 41.4% 

Emergency Supplies of 

Refined Petroleum 

Products 

690.0 26.0 (664.0) (96.2%) 

Source: OMB and DoS Section 2207 Reports. 

The Iraqi oil infrastructure was damaged at the beginning of the war and extensively 

looted soon afterwards. Oil is the most abundant natural resource in Iraq and the 

mainstay of the Iraqi economy. There are two sub-sectors in the Oil Infrastructure sector: 

Infrastructure and Emergency Supplies of Refined Oil Petroleum Products. As shown in 

Table 8, the Infrastructure sub-sector increased by $497 million while the Emergency 

Supplies of Refined Petroleum Products sub-sector was essentially eliminated. 

Sub-Sectors That Changed by More Than 25 Percent 

Infrastructure Increased by $497 Million, or 41.4 Percent. The Infrastructure subsector funds (1) the repair of the oil infrastructure, (2) projects to counter the terrorist 

threat to protect the current investments, and (3) projects to compensate for losses that are 

a direct result of previous terrorist attacks. Once production is stabilized, funds will then 

be used to continue to improve the Iraqi petroleum production systems with the ultimate 

goal of restoring pre-war capacity levels of about 3 million barrels per day. The program 

grew by $497 million, or 41.1 percent, over its original allocation. Approximately $450 

million of the increase occurred as a part of Ambassador Negroponte’s IRRF Strategic 

Spending Review in October 2004. The additional investment is targeted to increase 

Iraqi oil production and will be used to cover cost overruns on previously started projects, 

caused in part by the large number of pipelines sabotaged. 

Emergency Supplies of Refined Petroleum Decreased by $664 Million, or 96.2 

Percent. The Emergency Oil Supply sub-sector’s funding was essentially terminated, 

incurring a $664 million reduction, or 96.2 percent of its original funding. Originally the 

sub-sector was created because war damage, looting, poor maintenance, and sabotage had 

created interruptions to the flow of crude to the refineries. Difficulties due to outdated 

technology and poor maintenance at the refineries themselves and interruptions to the 

flow of refined products to the cities further added to the need to import petroleum 

products. Before the program began, however, the CPA decided to use Iraqi budget 

resources for these needs. Consequently, the money was moved primarily to the oil 

infrastructure sub-sector. 
21

Appendix F. Water Resources and Sanitation 

Sector 

The Water Resources and Sanitation Sector Decreased by $2,185.4 Billion, or 50.4 

Percent.

Table 9: Water Resources and Sanitation Funding Allocation Changes 

November 2003 to October 2005 (Millions of Dollars) 

Congressional 

Allocation 

November 2003 

Allocation as of 

October 2005 

Change Percent change 

Water Resources & 

Sanitation 

$4,332.0 $2,146.6 $(2,185.4) (50.4%)

Potable Water 2,830.0 1,483.0 (1,347.0) (47.6%)

Water Conservation 30.0 31.0 1.0 3.3%

Sewerage 675.0 234.7 (440.3) (65.2%)

Other Solid Waste 

Management 

22.0 10.9 (11.1) (50.5%)

Pumping Stations & 

Generators 

150.0 123.0 (27.0) (18.0%)

Irrigation & Drainage 

Systems 

130.0 38.4 (91.6) (70.5%)

Major Irrigation Projects 130.0 53.4 (76.6) (58.9%)

Dam Repair, 

Rehabilitation, & 

Construction 

125.0 61.5 (63.5) (50.8%)

Umm Qasr to Basra 

Water Pipeline & 

Treatment Plant 

200.0 110.7 (89.3) (44.7%)

Basra Channel Flushing 40.0 0 (40.0) (100.0%)

Source: OMB and DoS Section 2207 Reports. 

The Saddam regime’s misuse and mismanagement of Iraq’s water resources left large 

sections of the country with polluted water, saline-saturated croplands and 

malfunctioning or missing water supply and sewage control facilities. Clean water 

resources were extremely limited and were a high priority to sustain stability in the 

country and ensure long-term economic growth and preservation of life. The Water 

Resources and Sanitation sector addresses these needs. The sector consists of ten subsectors meant to increase public access to potable water and waste management systems; 

manage Iraq’s water resources; and irrigate Iraq’s farmland. While the significance of 

projects within this sector remains high, the sector has incurred the largest reduction in 

funding of any sector, losing $2.185 billion, or 50.4 percent of its original allocation. In 

terms of size, the sector has fallen from the second largest sector in November 2003, 

behind only the Electric Sector, to the fourth largest sector, behind Security and Law 

Enforcement; Electric; and the Justice, Public Safety Infrastructure, and Civil Society 

sectors. 
22

Sub-Sectors That Changed by More Than 25 Percent 

Potable Water Decreased by $1.347 Billion, or 47.6 Percent. In January 2004, about 

40 percent of the population of Iraq lacked access to safe, clean water. The goals of the 

potable water sub-sector were to bring new potable water access to an additional 15 

percent (about 4 million people) and to raise the quantity and quality of potable water 

access to generally accepted minimum international standards for another 15 percent of 

the Iraqi population. Therefore, projects were expected to benefit an additional 8 million 

people. As shown in Table 9, the potable water program was funded at $2.830 billion, 

but lost $1.343 billion, or 47.6 percent of its original allocation. According to a DoS 

official, approximately 57 projects were cut or deferred. The effect these project cuts had 

on the water sector’s goals, however, is difficult to measure. 

According to a September 2005 Government Accountability Office report, the CPA’s 

goals for providing essential services in Iraq were unrealistic because they were set 

without having baseline data on the condition of Iraq’s water and sanitation 

infrastructure.5

 Additionally, there is a lack of sound performance data and measures for 

gauging progress, such as measures of water quality and water metering systems that can 

measure water availability. In the absence of such measures, program officials track the 

number of projects started and completed. For example, DoS officials report that they 

currently have 27 IRRF-funded potable water projects planned or completed. Altogether, 

Water Sector officials project that an additional 2.75 million Iraqis will be served by U.S. 

funded potable water projects. 

Sewerage Decreased by $440.3 Million, or 65.2 Percent. Problems similar to those 

discussed in the potable water sub-sector also existed in the sewerage sub-sector. As 

shown in Table 9, the Sewerage sub-sector has lost $440.3 million of its funding, a 65.2 

percent decrease. Before the war, there were only 9 sewage treatment plants in 8 of the 

15 southern governorates. Even where sewer lines existed, broken lines and components 

were a major health hazard throughout the country. There was standing sewage in 

hundreds of municipalities, often in or next to schools, clinics, or public food markets. 

There are about 250 cities in Iraq, with only 6 percent of the population covered by 

treatment plants; the rest of the population depends on individual septic tanks and other 

means of disposal, which are often highly unsanitary. The CPA’s initial goal was to 

increase the sewerage service in cities by 5 percent to 11 percent of the population. 

However, as with water there is a lack of measures of both pre-war access to sewerage 

systems and how U.S. projects have improved the availability of sanitation services. 

Only two of ten originally planned projects will be completed. Nonetheless, DoS 

officials believe that approximately 4.5 million additional Iraqis are being served by U.S. 

funded sewerage projects. 

Other Solid Waste Management Decreased by $11 Million, or 50 Percent. The Other 

Solid Waste Management sub-sector consisted of one project that was terminated because 

geotechnical testing on the proposed site determined the water table was unacceptably 

close to the surface; there was a lack of secure access to the site; and squatters were still 

living on the property. Congress allocated $22 million for this project, and some 

equipment was purchased before the project was terminated. The purchased equipment 

will be turned over to the Kirkuk Governorate for use at their new landfill facility. 

 

5

 Rebuilding Iraq: U.S. Water and Sanitation Efforts Need Improved Measures for Assessing Impact and 

Sustained Resources for Maintaining Facilities, GAO-05-872, (Sep. 7, 2005). 
23

Irrigation and Drainage Systems Decreased by $92 Million, or 70.5 Percent. The 

Irrigation and Drainage sub-sector envisioned three projects to rehabilitate old operating 

irrigation and drainage systems to improve water use efficiency and water quality, 

however, the program was largely terminated. The existing systems needed major 

rehabilitation to improve the efficiency and reliability of water use, and the goal was to 

allow the irrigation of 900,000 hectares.6 Approximately $92 million of the originally 

allocated $130 million was reallocated to higher priority projects, and the one remaining 

project was de-scoped to engineering and design studies only. 

Major Irrigation Projects Decreased by $76.6 Million, or 58.9 Percent. The Major 

Irrigation Projects program envisioned five projects to complete the construction of 

major, ongoing irrigation and drainage projects. This was largely dropped, and only one 

of the five projects will be undertaken, and this project has been de-scoped to an 

engineering and design study only. Congress allocated $130 million for the five projects, 

and the current budget forecast is $53.4 million will be spent; a reduction of $76.6 

million. 

Dam Repair, Rehabilitation, and New Construction Decreased by $63.5 Million, or 

50.8 Percent. The original goal of the Dam Repair Rehabilitation, and New Construction 

sub-sector was to construct six new dams in three governorates needed to provide water 

for villages and livestock; and to repair six dams with critical safety issues. Ultimately, 

only one repair project was completed. Engineering and design studies were completed 

for three other projects. Congress funded this program at $125 million, but only $61.5 

million is currently budgeted, a 50.8 percent reduction. 

Umm Qasr/Basra Water Supply Project Decreased by $89.3 Million, or 44.7 

Percent. Congress allocated $200 million for the Umm Qasr/Basra Water Supply 

Project, but the CPA almost immediately adjusted its cost estimate for this project to 

$114 million. The project entails maintenance to the canal that provides water to the city 

of Basra. The project is ongoing. 

Basra Channel Flushing Decreased by $40 Million, or 100 Percent. The Basra 

Channel Flushing sub-sector was a $40 million program to flush canals extending 

throughout the city of Basra of stagnant water and debris. The program was dropped 

when the Interim Iraqi government decided to complete the work using its own resources. 

 

6

 A hectare is a metric unit of area equal to 2.471 acres. 
24

Appendix G. Transportation and 

Communications Sector 

The Transportation and Communications Sector Increased by $8.5 Million, or 1.7 

Percent. 

Table 10: Transportation and Communications Funding Allocation Changes 

November 2003 to October 2005 (Millions of Dollars) 

Congressional 

Allocation 

November 20031

Allocation as of 

October 2005 

Change Percent change 

Transportation & 

Communications 

$500.0 $508.5 $8.5 1.7%

Civil Aviation 115.0 113.7 (1.3) (1.1%)

Umm Qasr Port Rehab 40.0 45.0 5.0 12.5%

Railroad Rehab & 

Restoration 

210.0 189.3 (20.7) (9.9%)

Iraq Telecom & Postal 

Corporation 

20.0 20.0 0 0.0%

Iraqi Communications 

Systems 

90.0 45.5 (44.5) (49.4%)

Consolidated Fiber 

Network 

Not identified 70.0 70.0 0.0%

Iraqi Communications 

Operations 

25.0 25.0 0 0.0%

Source: OMB and DoS Section 2207 Reports. 

Note1

: Congress reduced funding for transportation and communications sector programs by $280 million 

but did not identify which sub-sectors should be reduced. Consequently, we used the CPA’s January 2004 

allocation as our starting point. 

The Transportation and Communications sector has changed very little from its original 

allocation. Funding changes shown in the table largely represent the removal of the 

Consolidated Fiber Network project from the Iraqi Communications Systems sub-sector, 

in order to establish it as an independent sub-sector. Other sub-sectors are identified as 

essential for Iraq to make a transition to a functioning market based economy, such as 

increasing cargo handling volume and speed, increasing the effective capacity of the 

railroad, and enabling passenger and cargo traffic at Iraq’s three main airports. The 

sector was funded at $500 million and received a modest $8.5 million (1.7 percent) 

increase in funding. 

Sub-sectors That Changed by More Than 25 Percent 

Iraq Communications Systems Decreased by $44.5 Million, or 49.4 Percent. The 

Iraq Communications Systems sub-sector decreased by $44.5 million. However, the bulk 

of this change was the result of transferring the consolidated fiber network project into its 

own sub-sector line in order to consolidate and eliminate redundancies from three project 

codes that had separate fiber optic networks planned. Other projects in this sector are new 

switching and transport systems for wide-area voice and data traffic. 
25

Consolidated Fiber Network Was Established as a New Sub-sector . The 

Consolidated Fiber Network project was removed from the Iraqi Communications 

Systems sub-sector and established as a new independent sub-sector. Funding was set at 

$70 million; $44 million of which came from the Iraq Communications Systems 

program. The sub-sector consolidates three separate fiber optic projects and eliminates 

redundancies. When completed, the network will provide a communications network 

that will support the electricity, railroad, and telecommunications sectors. 
26

Appendix H. Roads Bridges and Construction 

Sector 

The Roads, Bridges, and Construction Sector Decreased by $36.3 Million, or 9.8 Percent. 

Table 11: Roads, Bridges, and Construction Funding Allocation Changes 

November 2003 to October 2005 (Millions of Dollars) 

Congressional 

Allocation 

November 2003 

Allocation as of 

October 2005 

Change Percent change 

Roads, Bridges, and 

Construction 

$370.0 $333.7 $(36.3) (9.8%)

Public Building 

Construction & Repair 

130.0 127.0 (3.0) (2.3%)

Roads & Bridges 240.0 206.7 (33.3) (13.9%)

Source: OMB and DoS Section 2207 Reports. 

The Roads, Bridges, and Construction sector changed very little, decreasing by only 

$36.3 million. Sector projects include the reconstruction and rehabilitation of public 

buildings to include four ministry headquarters buildings and the rehabilitation of 60 

school buildings. It will also fund a small portion of Iraq’s overall requirement for road 

and bridge improvements. As shown in Table 11, there are two sub-sectors in this sector; 

Public Building Construction and Repair, and Roads and Bridges. Congress allocated 

$370 million for the sector and it has incurred only a 9.8 percent change. 

No Roads, Bridges, and Construction sub-sectors had a funding change of more than 25 

percent. 
27

Appendix I. Health Care Sector 

The Health Care Sector Decreased by $7 Million, or 1 Percent 

Table 12: Health Care Funding Allocation Changes 

November 2003 to October 2005 (Millions of Dollars) 

Congressional 

Allocation 

November 2003 

Allocation as of 

October 2005 

Change Percent change 

Health Care $793.0 $786.0 $(7.0) (<1.0%)

Nationwide Hospital & 

Clinic Improvements 

443.0 439.0 (4.0) (<1.0%)

Equipment Procurement 

& Modernization 

300.0 297.0 (3.0) (<1.0%)

Pediatric Facility in Basra 50.0 50.0 0 0.0%

Source: OMB and DoS Section 2207 Reports. 

The Health Care sector incurred only minor changes in its funding. The sector funds 

improvements to the Iraqi health system, which had deteriorated as a result of years of 

neglect and mismanagement by Saddam’s regime. The Congress allocated $793 million 

to purchase needed medical equipment, repair and modernize 15 hospitals and construct 

new primary healthcare centers in every governorate, and train over 5,000 medical and 

other primary care staff to support the restoration of Iraq’s health care system. As shown 

in Table 12, there are three sub-sectors in the Health Care sector, each of which 

maintained its funding. The $7 million in funding that was reallocated occurred in July 

2004 when money was withdrawn to cover the operating expenses of the U.S. mission in 

Iraq. 

No health care sector sub-sectors had a funding change of more than 25 percent. 
28

Appendix J. Private Sector Development Sector 

The Private Sector Development Sector Increased by $290 Million, or 190 Percent 

Table 13: Private Sector Development Funding Allocation Changes 

November 2003 to October 2005 (Millions of Dollars) 

Congressional 

allocation 

November 2003 

Allocation as of 

October 2005 

Change Percent change 

Private Sector 

Development1

153.0 443.0 290.0 + 190.0%

Expand Network of 

Employment Centers 

8.0 8.0 0 0.0%

Vocational Training2 63.0 75.1 12.1 19.2%

Business Skills 

Training1

37.0 37.0 0 0.0%

Micro-Small-Medium 

Enterprises 

45.0 44.0 (1.0) (2.2%)

Institutional Reforms Not identified 80.0 80.0 0.0%

Agriculture Not identified 100.0 100.0 0.0%

Market-Based Reforms Not identified 98.9 98.9 0.0%

Iraq Debt Forgiveness1 Not identified 352.3 352.3 0.0%

Source: OMB and DoS Section 2207 Reports. 

1

Section 2207 Reports show the sector received $795.3 million. However, this includes $352.3 million for 

Iraq Debt Forgiveness. Because Iraq Debt forgiveness is not an actual program, we excluded it from the 

total to provide a clearer picture of program change within the sector. 2

Congress allocated $100 million for training but did not identify how much was to go to vocational 

training and business skills training. We used information in the body of the Section 2207 report to make 

the allocation. 

The Private Sector Development sector was originally intended to open employment 

centers to match the needs of the public and private sector. However, in September 2004 

Ambassador Negroponte conducted a strategic review of spending plans to free up funds 

to target key high-impact projects and support longer-term reconstruction efforts. The 

Private Sector Development sector was a key recipient of those funds, and three new subsectors were created to encourage diversification in the Iraqi economy and to develop a 

competitive sector; Institutional Reforms; Agriculture; and Market-Based Reforms. 

These programs received $278.9 million. Additionally, Congress authorized the use of 

IRRF funds to pay for the budget cost of forgiving approximately $4 billion in bilateral 

debt that Iraq owes the U.S. This brings the total change within this sector as a result of 

the strategic review to $639 million. In our earlier tables, we subtracted Iraq Debt 

Forgiveness from the Private Sector Development totals, because Iraq Debt Forgiveness 

is not an actual program and including it skews the actual program changes that occurred 

within this sector. 

Other than the three new sub-sectors added no Private Sector Development sub-sectors 

had funding changes greater than 25 percent. 
29

Appendix K. Education, Refugees, Human 

Rights, and Governance Sector 

The Education, Refugees, Human Rights, and Governance Sector Increased by $83 

Million, or 29.6 Percent. 

Table 14: Education, Refugees, Human Rights, and Governance Funding Allocation Changes 

November 2003 to October 2005 (Millions of Dollars) 

Congressional 

Allocation 

November 2003 

Allocation as of 

October 2005 

Change Percent change 

Education, Refugees, 

Human Rights & 

Governance 

$280.0 $363.0 $83.0 29.6%

Migration & Refugee 

Assistance 

105.0 159.0 54.0 51.4%

Property Claims 

Tribunal 

30.0 10.0 (20.0) (66.7%)

Governance Not identified 40 40 0.0%

Banking System 

Modernization 

30.0 30.0 0 0.0%

Human Rights 15.0 15.0 0 0.0%

Education 90.0 99.0 9.0 10.0%

Civic Programs 10.0 10.0 0 0.0%

Source: OMB and DoS Section 2207 Reports. 

Projects in this sector address a variety set of issues, including meeting the needs of 

refugees, reforming Iraq’s banks, supporting the works of the Property Claims 

Commission, improving human rights, and supporting the development of education. As 

shown in Table 14, the sector consists of seven sub-sectors and experienced an overall 

gain of $83 million, or a 29.6 percent increase. One new sub-sector, Governance, was 

created. 

Sub-Sectors That Changed by More Than 25 Percent 

Migration and Refugee Assistance Increased by $54 Million, or 51.4 Percent. The 

Migration and Refugee Assistance sub-sector received an additional $70 million as a 

result of Ambassador Negroponte’s IRRF Strategic Review in October 2004 to provide 

emergency relief assistance to over 100,000 Arabs and 50,000 Kurds, resettlement 

assistance to 300,000 Kurds, and establish a contingency capability to respond quickly to 

sudden population displacement due to violence or natural disasters. The sub-sector 

subsequently lost $16 million, but no effect was identified in the Section 2207 Reports. 

Property Claims Tribunal Decreased by $20 Million, or 66.7 Percent. The original 

intent of this sub-sector was to create a process to resolve the many real property disputes 

created by the Arabization campaign and other confiscatory practices of Saddam’s 
30

regime. Iraq’s Governing Council planned to create a Property Claims Commission to 

adjudicate the claims, and the U.S. planned to fund the establishment of offices, staffing, 

and equipment for the Commission, and contribute $20 million for the compensation 

fund. A compensation fund, however, was included in the revised 2004 Iraqi budget, and 

the $20 million was reallocated. 

Governance Was Established as a New Program . Governance is a new $40 million 

sub-sector whose focus is on building the capacity of parties, and coalitions of parties, to 

respond to the challenge of the first national elections of the post-Saddam era. DoS 

engaged with the National Endowment on Democracy, the International Republican 

Institute, and the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs to develop 

programs to support democratic political parties and to support the democratic political 

process leading up to the January 2005 elections and beyond. 
31

Appendix L. Acronyms 

CPA Coalition Provisional Authority 

DoS Department of State 

IRRF Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund 

SIGIR Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction 
32

Appendix M. Report Distribution 

Department of State 

Secretary of State 

Senior Advisor to the Secretary and Coordinator for Iraq 

U.S. Ambassador to Iraq 

Director, Iraq Reconstruction Management Office 

Inspector General, Department of State 

Department of Defense 

Secretary of Defense 

Deputy Secretary of Defense 

Director, Defense Reconstruction Support Office 

Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller)/Chief Financial Officer 

 Deputy Chief Financial Officer 

 Deputy Comptroller (Program/Budget) 

Inspector General, Department of Defense 

Department of the Army 

Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology 

Principal Deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, 

Logistics, and Technology 

Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Policy and Procurement) 

Director, Project and Contracting Office 

Commanding General, Joint Contracting Command – Iraq/Afghanistan 

Assistant Secretary of the Army for Financial Management and Comptroller 

Chief of Engineers and Commander, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 

 Commanding General, Gulf Region Division 

Auditor General of the Army 

U.S. Central Command

Commanding General, Multi-National Force – Iraq 

 Commanding General, Multi-National Security Transition Command – Iraq 

 Commander, Joint Area Support Group – Central 

Other Defense Organizations

Director, Defense Contract Audit Agency 
33

Other Federal Government Organizations 

Director, Office of Management and Budget 

Comptroller General of the United States 

Inspector General, Department of the Treasury 

Inspector General, Department of Commerce 

Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services 

Inspector General, U.S. Agency for International Development 

Mission Director – Iraq, U.S. Agency for International Development 

Congressional Committees and Subcommittees, Chairman and 

Ranking Minority Member 

U.S. Senate 

Senate Committee on Appropriations 

Subcommittee on Defense 

Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations and Related Programs 

Senate Committee on Armed Services 

Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

Subcommittee on International Operations and Terrorism 

Subcommittee on Near Eastern and South Asian Affairs 

Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information and 

International Security 

Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal 

Workforce, and the District of Columbia 

U.S. House of Representatives 

House Committee on Appropriations 

Subcommittee on Defense 

Subcommittee on Foreign Operations, Export Financing and Related Programs 

Subcommittee on Science, State, Justice and Commerce and Related Agencies 

House Committee on Armed Services 

House Committee on Government Reform 

Subcommittee on Management, Finance and Accountability 

Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats and International 

Relations 

House Committee on International Relations 

Subcommittee on Middle East and Central Asia 
34

Appendix N. Audit Team Members 

This audit report was prepared and the audit work was conducted under the 

direction of Joseph T. McDermott, the Assistant Inspector General for Auditing, 

Office of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction. The staff member 

who contributed to the report: 

Glenn D. Furbish