alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1305.3 Procedures in the event of a demand for disclosure. ( a ) Whenever a demand is made upon an employee or former employee of OMB for the production of material or the disclosure of information described in § 1305.2, he shall immediately notify the General Counsel. If possible, the General Counsel shall be notified before the employee or former employee concerned replies to or appears before the court or other authority.
( b ) If information or material is sought by a demand in any case or matter in which OMB is not a party, an affidavit (or, if that is not feasible, a statement by the party seeking the information or material, or by his attorney) setting forth a summary of the information or material sought and its relevance to the proceeding, must be submitted before a decision is made as to whether materials will be produced or permission to testify or otherwise provide information will be granted. Any authorization for testimony by a present or former employee of OMB shall be limited to the scope of the demand as summarized in such statement.
( c ) If response to a demand is required before instructions from the General Counsel are received, an attorney designated for that purpose by OMB shall appear, and shall furnish the court or other authority with a copy of the regulations contained in this part and inform the court or other authority that the demand has been or is being, as the case may be, referred for prompt consideration by the General Counsel. The court or other authority shall be requested respectfully to stay the demand pending receipt of the requested instructions from the General Counsel.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0348-0056)
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Conceptus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the“Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)            the accompanying Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2005(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

 

(ii)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  July 29, 2005 | /s/ Gregory  E. Lichtwardt                                        |   |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      | Gregory E.  Lichtwardt                                            |
|                      | Executive  Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 64825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27305]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AC19-45-000]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on December 6, 2018, Natural Gas Pipeline Company 
of America LLC filed a request for approval to use Account 439, 
authorized by the Financial Accounting Standards Board.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
eLibrary link and is available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
website that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance
    with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dd9b988f9e92b3b1b4b3b88ea8adadb2afa99dbbb8afbef3bab2ab"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="65232037262a0b090c0b00361015150a171125030017064b020a13">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comments: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on December 26, 2018.

    Dated: December 12, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-27305 Filed 12-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 182.42 Duties and fees not subject to drawback. The following duties or fees which may be applicable to a good entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption in the Customs territory of the United States are not subject to drawback under this subpart: ( a ) Antidumping and countervailing duties;
( b ) A premium offered or collected on a good with respect to quantitative import restrictions, tariff-rate quotas or tariff preference levels; and
( c ) Customs duties paid or owed under unused merchandise substitution drawback. There will be no payment of such drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) on goods exported to Canada or Mexico.
[CBP Dec. 21-10, 86 FR 35587, July 6, 2021]
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0139 - Proposed License to Export Byproduct and Source Material to Iraq for Use in Oil Well Logging (Application No. XB001300)

Accession Number: ML032200012

Date Released: Wednesday, August 20, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML032200009 - SECY-03-0139 - Proposed License to Export Byproduct and Source Material to Iraq for Use in Oil Well Logging (Application No. XB001300) (3 page(s), 8/15/2003)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Perkins & Marie
Callender’s Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 28, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Joseph F. Trungale, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
      March 30, 2009
            By:
      /s/ Joseph F.
      Trungale


Joseph
      F. Trungale


President
      and Chief Executive Officer
### §130–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 130–1 was editorially reclassified as section 5581 of this title.
§ 162.80 Liability for duties; liquidation of entries. ( a ) ( 1 ) When an entry is the subject of an investigation for possible violation of section 592, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1592), or of a penalty action established under that section, the Center director, subject to the provisions of paragraph (a)(2) of this section, may liquidate the entry and CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically, may collect duties before the conclusion of the investigation or final disposition of the penalty action if the Center director determines that liquidation would be in the interest of the Government.
( 2 ) ( i ) An entry not liquidated within 1 year from the date of entry or final withdrawal of all merchandise covered by a warehouse entry shall be deemed liquidated at the rate of duty, value, quantity, and amount of duties asserted at the time of entry by the importer, his consignee, or agent unless the time for liquidation is extended by the Center director because— ( A ) Information needed by Customs for the proper appraisement or classification of the merchandise is not available.
( B ) The importer, his consignee, or agent requests an extension and demonstrates good cause why the extention should be granted, or
( C ) The 1-year liquidation period is suspended as required by statute or court order.
( ii ) An entry not liquidated within 4 years from the date of entry or final withdrawal of all merchandise covered by a warehouse entry shall be deemed liquidated at the rate of duty, value, quantity, and amount of duties asserted at the time of entry by the importer, his consignee, or agent unless liquidation continues to be suspended by statute or court order. In that event, the entry shall be liquidated within 90 days after removal of the suspension.
( iii ) The Center director promptly shall notify the importer or consignee concerned and any authorized agent and surety of the importer or consignee in writing of any extension or suspension of the liquidation period.
( b ) When merchandise not covered by an entry is subject to section 592, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1592), a demand shall be made on the importer for payment of the duty estimated to be due on such merchandise.
( c ) Any applicable internal revenue tax shall also be demanded unless the merchandise is to be, or has been, forfeited.
[T.D. 84-18, 49 FR 1680, Jan. 13, 1984, as amended by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93024, Dec. 20, 2016]
#### Joseph W. Jacobs, Respondent, v. Arch Selwyn, Appellant, Impleaded with Selwyn & Company, Playbrokers, and Another.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS FOR
DELCO REMY INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,113
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  128,979
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,083
<INVENTORY>                                    198,437
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               369,630
<PP&E>                                         208,537
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,568
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 684,997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          170,170
<BONDS>                                        393,806
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           245
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   684,997
<SALES>                                        815,313
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               815,313
<CGS>                                          657,862
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  657,862
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               116,866
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,037
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,291
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (134)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (52)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,187)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,833
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,020)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1620.3 Contributions.

The employing agency is responsible for transmitting to the TSP record keeper, in accordance with the TSP record keeper's procedures, any employee and employer contributions that are required by this part.

[87 FR 31679, May 24, 2022]
### §4722. Mandatory Senate ethics training for Members and staff

#### (a) Training program

The Select Committee on Ethics shall conduct ongoing ethics training and awareness programs for Members of the Senate and Senate staff.

#### (b) Requirements

The ethics training program conducted by the Select Committee on Ethics shall be completed by—

(1) new Senators or staff not later than 60 days after commencing service or employment; and

(2) Senators and Senate staff serving or employed on September 14, 2007, not later than 165 days after September 14, 2007.

(Pub. L. 110–81, title V, §553, Sept. 14, 2007, 121 Stat. 773.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 72a–1h of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HECTOR BOLANOS CASAS,

 Petitioner,

 v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General,

 Respondent.

No. 23-541

Agency No.

A205-941-255

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 14, 2023**

Before: SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Hector Bolanos Casas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for withholding of removal

and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 22 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 23-541

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the 

agency’s factual findings. Conde Quevedo v. Barr, 947 F.3d 1238, 1241 (9th Cir. 

2020). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Bolanos Casas 

failed to establish that he was or would be persecuted on account of a protected 

ground. See Barajas-Romero v. Lynch, 846 F.3d 351, 359-60 (9th Cir. 2017); 

Grava v. INS, 205 F.3d 1177, 1181 n.3 (9th Cir. 2000) (“Purely personal 

retribution is, of course, not persecution on account of political opinion.”). We do 

not address Bolanos Casas’ contentions as to whether the past harm rose to the 

level of persecution or whether the government of Mexico is unable or unwilling to 

protect him because the BIA did not deny relief on these grounds. See SantiagoRodriguez v. Holder, 657 F.3d 820, 829 (9th Cir. 2011) (“In reviewing the decision 

of the BIA, we consider only the grounds relied upon by that agency.” (citation and 

internal quotation marks omitted)). Thus, Bolanos Casas’ withholding of removal 

claim fails. 

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT protection 

because Bolanos Casas failed to show he will be tortured by or with the consent or 

acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico. See Aden v. Holder, 589 

F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).
3 23-541

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until the mandate issues. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
§ 1302.1 General provisions. ( a ) *Purpose and scope.* This part implements the rules that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) follows under the Privacy Act of 1974, codified as amended at 5 U.S.C. 552a (Privacy Act). This part applies to all records in systems of records maintained by OMB that are retrieved by an individual's name or personal identifier. This part describes the procedures by which individuals may request access to records about themselves, request amendment or correction of those records, and request an accounting of disclosures of those records by OMB.
( b ) *Definitions.* As used in this part: *Request for access* to a record means a request made under 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(1).
*Request for amendment or correction* of a record means a request made under 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(2).
*Request for an accounting* means a request made under 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3).
*Requester* means an individual who makes a request for access, a request for amendment or correction, or a request for an accounting under the Privacy Act. An *individual* is a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.
*System manager* means the OMB official identified in a system of records notice as the manager of a system of records; and for Government-wide systems of records, the individual designated by the agency to act on behalf of the system manager.
( c ) *Providing written consent to disclose records protected under the Privacy Act.* OMB may disclose any record contained in a system of records by any means of communication to any person, or to another agency, pursuant to a written request by, or with the prior written consent of, the individual about whom the record pertains. An individual must verify the individual's identity in the same manner as required by § 1302.2(d) when providing written consent to disclose a record protected under the Privacy Act and pertaining to the individual.
### [§7511. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–456, title III, §302(d), May 24, 1962, 76 Stat. 77]

Section, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 900, related to exemption of consular officers and employees of foreign states from payment of internal revenue taxes on imported articles.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after Aug. 31, 1963, see section 501(a) of Pub. L. 87–456, title V, May 24, 1962, 76 Stat. 78.
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 13-1487 WALESKA GARAYALDE-RIJOS, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. MUNICIPALITY OF CAROLINA; JOSÉ APONTE-DALMAU, Mayor of the Municipality of Carolina, Defendants, Appellees, GERMÁN SANTIAGO-SERPA; JUAN ORTIZ-CRESPO; NYDIA R. TALAVERA-FORTY, Auxiliar Director of Human Resources Department; MABEL LÓPEZ, Defendants.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on March 28, 2014 is amended as follows: On page 3, line 18, "as" is inserted between "well" and "pendent." On p. 19, line 7, "who was" is inserted between "firefighter" and "denied."
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-04-014 March 22, 2004

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417 

 

NRC TO MEET WITH SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS

 SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT HATCH NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Southern Nuclear Operating

Company officials on Tuesday, April 6, to discuss the results of NRC’s annual assessment of safety

performance at the Hatch nuclear power plant near Baxley, Georgia. 

The meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. at the Southeastern Technical College, 3001 E. First

Street, in Vidalia. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be available

before the conclusion of the meeting to answer any questions.

 The performance period to be discussed is January 1 to December 31, 2003. In addition, NRC

staff will provide a brief overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process works.

A letter from the NRC to Southern Nuclear addresses plant safety performance during the

previous year and forms the basis for the meeting discussions. The letter states that Hatch operated

safely and that plant performance was at a level requiring no additional NRC inspection beyond

normal. The letter, which is available from Region II Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/hat_2003q4.pdf , says the NRC staff will also

continue to conduct inspections of the plant’s implementation of NRC security Orders, along with any

newly developed portions of the security inspection program. 

In addition to the routine inspections, the agency will also conduct inspections of the plant’s

spent fuel material control and accounting and independent spent fuel storage (dry cask storage)

operations.

On October 16 of last year, the company submitted a request to combine the emergency

operations facilities for Hatch, Farley and Vogtle into one facility located at company headquarters in

Birmingham, Alabama. The NRC has arranged for a demonstration of the centralized facility’s

capabilities next July 14 which will include supporting exercises at Farley and Hatch. NRC officials

said this will not be evaluated as part of the reactor oversight program but will be used to determine

approval of the request.
-2-

Current performance indicators for the two units at the Hatch plant are available at 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/HAT1/hat1_chart.html and

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/HAT2/hat2_chart.html

###
#### § 212.29 Payment of award.

An applicant seeking payment of an award shall submit to the Office of Finance of the Commission a copy of the Commission's final determination granting the award, accompanied by a statement that the applicant will not seek review of the decision in the United States courts. The address for submission to the Commission is: United States International Trade Commission, Office of Finance, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. The Commission will pay the amount to the applicant within 60 days, unless judicial review of the award or of the underlying determination of the adversary adjudication has been sought by the applicant or any other party to the proceeding.

[68 FR 32979, June 3, 2003]