alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Joseph E. Byrne, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Newark Group, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: July 27, 2005
#### § 171.24 Remission of forfeitures and payment of fees, costs or interest.

Any seizure subject to forfeiture may be remitted or mitigated pursuant to the provisions of 19 U.S.C. 1618 or 31 U.S.C. 5321, as applicable. Any person who accepts a remission or mitigation decision will not be considered to have substantially prevailed in a civil forfeiture proceeding for purposes of collection of any fees, costs or interest from the Government.

[T.D. 00-88, 65 FR 78093, Dec. 14, 2000]
### §1532. Withdrawal and credit

An amount available under law may be withdrawn from one appropriation account and credited to another or to a working fund only when authorized by law. Except as specifically provided by law, an amount authorized to be withdrawn and credited is available for the same purpose and subject to the same limitations provided by the law appropriating the amount. A withdrawal and credit is made by check and without a warrant.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 933.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1532 | 31:628–1. | Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 896, §1210(less last proviso), 64 Stat. 765. |

The word "limitations" is substituted for "limitations, conditions, and restrictions" to eliminate unnecessary words.
§ 1632.6 Public announcement of meetings. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided by the Act, public announcement of meetings open to public observation and meetings to be partially or completely closed to public observation pursuant to § 1632.7 of this part will be made at least one week in advance of the meeting. Except to the extent such information is determined to be exempt from disclosure under § 1632.5 of this part, each such public announcement will state the time, place and subject matter of the meeting, whether it is to be open or closed to the public, and the name and phone number of the official designated to respond to requests for information about the meeting.
( b ) If a majority of the members of the Board determines by a recorded vote that Board business requires that a meeting covered by paragraph (a) of this section be called at a date earlier than that specified in paragraph (a) of this section, the Board shall make a public announcement of the information specified in paragraph (a) of this section at the earliest practicable time.
( c ) Changes in the subject matter of a publicly announced meeting, or in the determination to open or close a publicly announced meeting or any portion of a publicly announced meeting to public observation, or in the time or place of a publicly announced meeting made in accordance with the procedures specified in § 1632.9 of this part, will be publicly announced at the earliest practicable time.
( d ) Public announcements required by this section will be posted at the Board's External Affairs Office and may be made available by other means or at other locations as may be desirable.
( e ) Immediately following each public announcement required by this section, notice of the time, place and subject matter of a meeting, whether the meeting is open or closed, any change in one of the preceding announcements and the name and telephone number of the official designated by the Board to respond to requests about the meeting, shall also be submitted for publication in the Federal Register.
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-03-003 January 23, 2003

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: opa2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $9,600 CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST VIRGINIA FIRM

FOR VIOLATION OF NRC RADIATION SAFETY REQUIREMENTS IN HAWAII

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $9,600 civil penalty against Testing

Technologies, Incorporated, of Woodbridge, Virginia, for violation of NRC safety requirements related

to the use of licensed radioactive material at a job site in Hawaii.

 In a letter to the company, Luis A. Reyes, Administrator of the NRC’s Region II office in Atlanta, 

said that, during an NRC inspection conducted in April of last year, the agency determined that,

between December 29, 2001 and January 27, 2002, the company deliberately violated NRC

requirements by permitting individuals who had not been properly certified to perform radiographic

operations at multiple temporary construction job sites on the island of Oahu, Hawaii. He said that

these individuals also were not accompanied by another radiographer or properly certified individual

while performing radiography. 

 In addition, he said that, on April 22 of last year, a radiographer’s assistant deliberately failed to

wear an alarming device, a direct reading dosimeter, and/or a required film badge or TLD

(thermoluminescent dosimeter) while conducting radiographic operations at the Tesoro Refinery in

Kapolei, Hawaii.

 Reyes said these violations indicated that, from December 2001 until April of last year, the

corporate and site Radiation Safety Officers failed to adequately perform their oversight duties as

required and that the violations, combined with their deliberate nature, resulted in a Severity Level 2

violation, the agency’s second most serious.

 The NRC’s letter, its enclosures, and the company’s response will be made available to interested

members of the public through the agency’s public electronic reading room at

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ADAMS.html Help in accessing these documents is available from

the NRC Public Document Room at (301) 415-4737 or at 1-800-397-4209.

 The company has 30 days from receipt of the letter to either pay the civil penalty or to protest its

imposition.

###
§ 190.153 Continuous CBP custody. ( a ) *Merchandise released under an importer's bond and returned.* Merchandise released to an importer under a bond prescribed by § 142.4 of this chapter and later returned to the public stores upon requisition of the appropriate CBP office will not be deemed to be in the continuous custody of CBP officers.
( b ) *Merchandise released under Chapter 98, Subchapter XIII, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States* (*HTSUS).* Merchandise released as provided for in Chapter 98, Subchapter XIII, HTSUS (19 U.S.C. 1202), will not be deemed to be in the continuous custody of CBP officers.
( c ) *Merchandise released from warehouse.* For the purpose of this subpart, in the case of merchandise entered for warehouse, CBP custody will be deemed to cease when estimated duty has been deposited and the appropriate CBP office has authorized the withdrawal of the merchandise.
( d ) *Merchandise not warehoused, examined elsewhere than in public stores* — ( 1 ) *General rule.* Except as stated in paragraph (d)(2) of this section, merchandise examined elsewhere than at the public stores, in accordance with the provisions of § 151.7 of this chapter, will be considered released from CBP custody upon completion of final examination for appraisement.
( 2 ) *Merchandise upon the wharf.* Merchandise which remains on the wharf by permission of the appropriate CBP office will be considered to be in CBP custody, but this custody will be deemed to cease when the CBP officer in charge accepts the permit and has no other duties to perform relating to the merchandise, such as measuring, weighing, or gauging.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# 01/25/02 - Package to R. D. Quinn, BNFL Subject: Amendment No. 2 to CoC No 1026 for the FuelSolutions Spent Fuel Mgmt System.

Accession Number: ML020250512

Date Released: Thursday, August 9, 2007

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML020250519 - 01/25/02 - Ltr to R. D. Quinn, BNFL  From: E. W. Brach  Subject: Amendment No. 2 to Certificate of Compliance No. 1026 for the FuelSolutions Spent Fuel Managment System  Enclosures: 1.) CoC No. 1026, Amendment No. 2; and 2.) Safety Evaluation Report. (3 page(s), 1/25/2002)
    - ML020250542 - Certificate of Compliance No. 1026, Amendment No. 2 for the BNFL FuelSolutions Spent Fuel Management System. (5 page(s), 1/28/2002)
    - ML020250578 - Technical Specifications for CoC No. 1026, Amendment No. 2 (BNFL FuelSolutions). (62 page(s), 1/25/2002)
    - ML020250586 - Final Safety Evaluation Report for the BNFL FuelSolutions Spent Fuel Management System (CoC No. 1026, Amendment No. 2). (4 page(s), 1/25/2002)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
| | Exhibit 32.2
| | ------------

Certification
of Chief Financial Officerof Prime Medical Services, Inc.

|This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form
10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 of Prime Medical Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Issuer).
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, John Q. Barnidge, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:  May 5, 2004

| | /s/ John Q. Barnidge

John Q. Barnidge
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Prime Medical Services, Inc.
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### § 1400.103 Implementation.

OPM and the Security Executive Agent designated pursuant to Executive Order 13467 or any successor order may set forth policies, general procedures, criteria, standards, quality control procedures, and supplementary guidance for the implementation of this part.
November 17, 2014 

Scott Faulk 

Secretary of Transportation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington D.C. 20590 

Subject: Request for Extension 

mart 

middle georgia regional airport 

Order 2014-10-21 Served on October 24, 2014 

City Of Macon, Middle Georgia Regional Airport 

Dear Mr. Faulk, 

As you already know, the U.S. Department of Transportation issued a RFP soliciting carriers interested in 

providing EAS at Macon, GA. The deadline for submitting proposals to the Department is currently 

November 24, 2014. In an effort to ensure the airlines have ample time to respond, we are requesting the 

Department extend the due date until January 8, 2014. We are hopeful this process will result into a 

quality carrier serving Macon that is capable of achieving new requirements. Please feel free to contact 

me for any questions or concerns. 

Sincerely, 

~~~cr~ Airport Manager 

Middle Georgia Regional Airport • Macon Downtown Airport • TBJ Airport Management Inc. 

1000 Terminal Drive • Suite 100' Macon, Georgia 31216 • (478) 803-0456
#### UNITED STATES *of*America, Respondent-Appellee, v. Kareem TOMBLIN, Petitioner-Appellant.

No. 02-6456.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 28, 2002.

Kareem Tomblin, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Kareem Tomblin appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See United States v. Tomblin,*No. CR-92-238-3-V (W.D.N.C. Dec. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-00-48 July 18, 2000

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC PROPOSES $2,750 CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST DOCTOR IN PUERTO RICO

FOR VIOLATION OF NRC REGULATORY SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a $2,750 civil penalty against Dr.

Roberto Buxeda-Dacri, M.D., of Santurce, Puerto Rico for violation of NRC safety requirements

involving failure to perform required periodic leak tests of the radioactive source in a device used in

the medical treatment of eye conditions.

NRC officials said Dr. Buxeda-Dacri was cited by the agency for this same violation during the

last three NRC inspections at his facility, demonstrating what they termed a careless disregard for NRC

requirements. The NRC said the fourth occurrence of the violation indicated that it was of a willful

nature and that the civil penalty was proposed as a result.

The device, called an eye applicator, is used in the medical treatment of eye conditions and

contains a radioactive source of approximately 31 millicuries of Strontium-90. A leak test performed

after the NRC’s May 2 identification of the violation confirmed the absence of any leakage and that the

violation did not result in any actual safety consequences.

The licensee has 30 days from receipt of the Notice of Violation to either pay the civil penalty or

to protest its imposition, in whole or in part.

#
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov 

No. III-04-005 January 20, 2004

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC DISPATCHES SPECIAL INSPECTION TEAM TO LOOK INTO

SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PROBLEM AT KEWAUNEE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a special inspection into the clogging of the

heat exchangers for the safety injection pump oil coolers at the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant in

Kewaunee, Wisconsin. The clogging would render the pumps inoperable. The plant is managed by

Nuclear Management Company.

The plant was shut down on January 16, when routine testing by plant staff uncovered that the

heat exchangers used to cool the oil that lubricates the safety injection system pumps were partially

clogged by silt and lake weed. The safety injection system provides emergency cooling at the plant. 

This problem could prevent effective cooling of the reactor in certain accident conditions.

The NRC inspection team includes a senior inspector from another plant in Region III and a

senior inspector from the Region III office in Lisle, Illinois. The team will examine the sequence of

events that led to the clogging, and evaluate the immediate and long-term corrective actions taken by

the plant.

The report of the inspection team will be publicly available when it is issued about 30 days

after the close of the special inspection. The report will be posted at the NRC’s electronic reading

room at: http://nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html. To locate the report, once it is issued, enter

the docket number for the Kewaunee plant (05000305) in the search phrase box. Assistance in using

the web reading room is available by calling the NRC Public Document Room at 800-397-4209. 

###
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1516 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                      October 17, 2003.
      Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
1516) entitled ``An Act to provide for the establishment by the 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs of five additional cemeteries in the 
National Cemetery System.'', do pass with the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

(1)Page 2, line 8, strike out [five] and insert: six

(2)Page 2, after line 18, insert:
            (6) The Sarasota County, Florida, area.

(3)Page 3, line 17, strike out [five] and insert: six

            Amend the title so as to read: ``An Act to provide for the 
        establishment by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs of 
        additional cemeteries in the National Cemetery 
        Administration.''

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1516

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            67,622
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  95,147
<CASH>                                          20,650
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               4,101
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         175,971
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,480,236
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 66,768
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                981
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,175,391
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,500
<COMMON>                                         4,502
<OTHER-SE>                                     193,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,480,236
<PREMIUMS>                                       4,452
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              3,177
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               1,051
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     106
<BENEFITS>                                       5,485
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      5,676
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            22,804
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,760
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,382)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,378
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,378
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>