alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. III-03-070 November 25, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC OVERSIGHT PANEL TO MEET WITH DAVIS-BESSE OFFICIALS DECEMBER 3

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission Davis-Besse oversight panel will hold two meetings on

Wednesday, December 3, to review the status and adequacy of recent activities at the Davis-Besse

Nuclear Power Station. 

The plant, operated by FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company near Oak Harbor, Ohio, has

been shut down since February 16 of last year as a result of corrosion damage to its reactor vessel head.

The meetings will be held in the Oak Harbor High School Auditorium, 11661 West State Route

163, in Oak Harbor. 

Although FirstEnergy has requested that the NRC schedule a meeting on the possible restart of

the plant, the December 3 meetings will not address plant restart. The utility is expected to report on

ongoing plant activities and on its long-term plans for evaluating and improving the safety culture of

the plant management and staff.

The first meeting will begin at 2 p.m. (EST), when the NRC oversight panel, set up to monitor

the activities associated with the plant’s recovery from problems which led to the reactor vessel head

corrosion, will meet with utility officials. The public is invited to observe the business portion of the

meeting and will have an opportunity to make comments and ask questions of the NRC staff before the

meeting is adjourned.

The second meeting will begin at 7 p.m. (EST) for the oversight panel to update the public on

NRC’s activities related to the reactor vessel degradation and to provide a summary of the earlier

meeting. The public will be invited to ask questions and make comments.

The transcripts of both oversight panel meetings will be posted in several weeks on the NRC’s

web site - http://www.nrc.gov. Select “Davis-Besse” from the Key Topics menu. 

The NRC oversight panel includes NRC management and staff from its Region III office in

Lisle, Illinois; the NRC Headquarters office in Rockville, Maryland; and the NRC Resident Inspector

Office at the Davis-Besse site.

Documents on the Davis-Besse corrosion issue, including further details on NRC’s oversight

panel activities, are posted on the NRC’s web site.

# # #
#### BRITTON MILLING COMPANY, Appellant, v. WILLIAMS, Respondent.

(184 N. W. 268.)

(File No. 4821.

Opinion filed September 2, 1921.

Rehearing granted November 9, 1921.)

Negotiable Instruments — Defense of False Representations Re Milling Stock — Former Decision in Similar Case Followed.

All material facts herein being identical With facts in Britton Milling Company v. H. J. Williams, 44 S. D. 464, 184 N. W. *526265, the decision in that case governs here, and judgment and. order appealed from are reversed.

Gates, J., dissenting.

Whiting, J., not sitting.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brown County. Hon. Frank Anderson, Judge.

Action by Britton Milling Company, a corporation, against E. G. Williams, to recover upon a promissory note. From a judgment for Defendant, and from an order denying a new trial, Plaintiff appeals.

Reversed.

*Harold W. King,*and *McNulty & Campbell,*for Appellant.

*Campbell & Walton,*for Respondent.

POEEEY, P. J.

All the material facts in this case are identical with the facts in Britton Milling Co. v. H. J. Williams, 184 N. W. 265, No. 4820, handed down on the 31st day of August, and for the reasons therein stated the decision is the same.

The judgment and order appealed from are reversed.

GATES, J., dissents.

WHITINÍG, J., not sitting.
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23532]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--EIFS Industry Members Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 31, 2004, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the EIFS Industry Members 
Association (``EIMA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
(1) the name and principal place of business of the standards 
development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards 
development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: EIFS Industry 
Members Association, Morrow, GA. The nature and scope of EIMA's 
standards development activities are: as a standards development 
institution accredited by the American National Standards Institute 
(``ANSI''), EIMA developed, maintains and updates the ANSI/EIMA 99-A-
2001 standards which provides the requirements for specifying and 
installing Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23532 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
```
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. John Dolac, Respondent, against John F. Foster, Warden of Auburn State Prison, Defendant. The People of the State of New York, Appellant.

Order reversed on the law and facts, without costs of this appeal to any party, and writ dismissed. Memorandum: The sentencing court held that the respondent is legally held in custody as a second offender. The respondent has not appealed. The confession of respondent, in which he admitted that he was armed, was received in evidence on the trial and was not, so far as the record shows, challenged by the respondent. At the close of all the evidence but before the case was sent to the jury, the defendant-respondent pleaded guilty to robbery in the second degree. There was a reviewable record containing the confession and no further hearing was necessary for a finding that the respondent was armed under the rule in *People*v. *Caruso*(249 N. Y. 302). The additional sentence under section 1944 of the Penal Law was proper. All concur. (The order sustains a writ of habeas corpus insofar as the imposition of the additional term of five years is concerned and directs that relator be discharged from custody at the termination of his fifteen year sentence and that relator’s name be certified to the Governor.) Present — Taylor, P. J.,"Larkin, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
### §6565. Advancement by Secretary of Senate of travel funds to employees under his jurisdiction for Federal Election Campaign Act travel expenses

The Secretary of the Senate is hereafter authorized to advance, in his discretion, to any designated employee under his jurisdiction, such sums as may be necessary, not exceeding $1,500, to defray official travel expenses in assisting the Secretary in carrying out his duties under the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 [52 U.S.C. 30101 et seq.]. Any such employee shall, as soon as practicable, furnish to the Secretary a detailed voucher for such expenses incurred and make settlement with respect to any amount so advanced.

(Pub. L. 92–607, ch. V, §504, Oct. 31, 1972, 86 Stat. 1505.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 92–225, Feb. 7, 1972, 86 Stat. 3, which is classified principally to chapter 301 (§30101 et seq.) of Title 52, Voting and Elections. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 61a–9 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 89 FR 20832, Mar. 25, 2024.

§ 351.107 Cash deposit rates for nonproducing exporters; rates in antidumping proceedings involving a nonmarket economy country. ( a ) *Introduction.* This section deals with the establishment of cash deposit rates in situations where the exporter is not the producer of subject merchandise, the selection of the appropriate cash deposit rate in situations where entry documents do not indicate the producer of subject merchandise, and the calculation of dumping margins in antidumping proceedings involving imports from a nonmarket economy country.
( b ) *Cash deposit rates for nonproducing exporters* — ( 1 ) *Use of combination rates* — ( i ) *In general.* In the case of subject merchandise that is exported to the United States by a company that is not the producer of the merchandise, the Secretary may establish a “combination” cash deposit rate for each combination of the exporter and its supplying producer(s).
( ii ) *Example.* A nonproducing exporter (Exporter A) exports to the United States subject merchandise produced by Producers X, Y, and Z. In such a situation, the Secretary may establish cash deposit rates for Exporter A/Producer X, Exporter A/Producer Y, and Exporter A/Producer Z.
( 2 ) *New supplier.* In the case of subject merchandise that is exported to the United States by a company that is not the producer of the merchandise, if the Secretary has not established previously a combination cash deposit rate under paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section for the exporter and producer in question or a noncombination rate for the exporter in question, the Secretary will apply the cash deposit rate established for the producer. If the Secretary has not previously established a cash deposit rate for the producer, the Secretary will apply the “all-others rate” described in section 705(c)(5) or section 735(c)(5) of the Act, as the case may be.
( c ) *Producer not identified* — ( 1 ) *In general.* In situations where entry documents do not identify the producer of subject merchandise, if the Secretary has not established previously a noncombination rate for the exporter, the Secretary may instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to apply as the cash deposit rate the higher of: ( i ) The highest of any combination cash deposit rate established for the exporter under paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section;
( ii ) The highest cash deposit rate established for any producer other than a producer for which the Secretary established a combination rate involving the exporter in question under paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section; or
( iii ) The “all-others rate” described in section 705(c)(5) or section 735(c)(5) of the Act, as the case may be.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( d ) *Rates in antidumping proceedings involving nonmarket economy countries.* In an antidumping proceeding involving imports from a nonmarket economy country, “rates” may consist of a single dumping margin applicable to all exporters and producers.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 565 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the treatment of 

veterans who participated in the cleanup of Enewetak Atoll as radiationexposed veterans for purposes of the presumption of service-connection 

of certain disabilities by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 3, 2021 

Ms. SMITH (for herself, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. LEAHY, Ms. HIRONO, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. KING, Ms. WARREN, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. 

COONS, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. MARKEY, Ms. SINEMA, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, 

Ms. COLLINS, and Ms. BALDWIN) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the 

treatment of veterans who participated in the cleanup 

of Enewetak Atoll as radiation-exposed veterans for purposes of the presumption of service-connection of certain 

disabilities by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 565 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mark Takai Atomic 

3 Veterans Healthcare Parity Act of 2021’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF VETERANS WHO PARTICIPATED IN 

5 CLEANUP OF ENEWETAK ATOLL AS RADI6 ATION-EXPOSED VETERANS FOR PURPOSES 

7 OF PRESUMPTION OF SERVICE-CONNECTION 

8 OF CERTAIN DISABILITIES BY DEPARTMENT 

9 OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

10 Section 1112(c)(3)(B) of title 38, United States 

11 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

12 clause: 

13 ‘‘(v) Cleanup of Enewetak Atoll during the 

14 period beginning on January 1, 1977, and end15 ing on December 31, 1980.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
§ 360.104 Steel import monitoring. ( a ) Commerce will maintain an import monitoring system on the SIMA system website that will report certain aggregate information on imports of steel mill products obtained from the steel licenses and, where available, from the U.S. Census Bureau. Aggregate data will be reported, as appropriate, on a monthly basis by country of origin, country of melt and pour, and relevant steel mill product groupings, etc. and will include import quantity (metric tons), import Customs value (U.S. $), and average unit value ($/metric ton). The website will also contain certain aggregate data at the 6-digit Harmonized Tariff Schedule level and will also present a range of historical data for comparison purposes. Provision of aggregate data on the website may be revisited should concerns arise over the possible release of proprietary data.
( b ) Reported monthly import data will be refreshed each week, as appropriate, with new data on licenses issued during the previous week. This data will also be adjusted periodically for cancelled or unused steel import licenses, as appropriate. Additionally, outdated license data will be replaced, where available, with information from the U.S. Census Bureau.
[85 FR 56171, Sept. 11, 2020]
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                   PRIME MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES                   Exhibit 12
                 COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                 ----------
                FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 AND 2002
                                    (Unaudited)



                                                                   Three Months Ended March 31,
($ in thousands)                                                       2003            2002
                                                                  ------------      ----------

<S>                                                                  <C>             <C>
Income before income taxes and after minority interests              $ 2,833         $ 3,416

Undistributed equity income                                                -            (102)

Minority interest income of subsidiaries with fixed charges            2,145           2,857
                                                                    --------        --------

     Adjusted earnings                                                 4,978           6,171
                                                                    --------        --------

Interest on debt                                                       2,096           2,543

Loan fees                                                                  -             296
                                                                    --------        --------

     Total fixed charges                                               2,096           2,839
                                                                    --------        --------

Total available earnings before fixed charges                        $ 7,074         $ 9,010
                                                                    ========        ========

Ratio                                                                    3.4             3.2
                                                                    ========        ========




</TABLE>
#### § 207.43 [Reserved]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7790

DON LOUIS BARKER, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT SPANGLER, Acting Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-00-

2625-MJG)

Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 17, 2001

Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Don Louis Barker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Celia Anderson Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Don Louis Barker, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. Barker v. Spangler, No. CA00-2625-MJG (D. Md. Nov. 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §1519. Criminal penalty

An officer or employee of the United States Government or of the District of Columbia government knowingly and willfully violating section 1517(a) of this title shall be fined not more than $5,000, imprisoned for not more than 2 years, or both.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 932.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1519 | 31:665(i)(1)(words after semicolon related to (h)). | R.S. §3679(i)(1)(words after semicolon related to (h)); Mar. 3, 1905, ch. 1484, §4(1st par.), 33 Stat. 1257; Feb. 27, 1906, ch. 510, §3, 34 Stat. 48; restated Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 896, §1211, 64 Stat. 768. |

The words "District of Columbia government" are added because of section 9 of the Act of June 26, 1912 (ch. 182, 37 Stat. 184).
### §80. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 80 was editorially reclassified as section 5309 of this title.
§ 1601.22 Methods of requesting a fund reallocation. ( a ) Participants may make a fund reallocation in the form and manner prescribed by the TSP record keeper. Paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section apply to a fund reallocation request: ( 1 ) Fund reallocation requests must be made in whole percentages (one percent increments). The sum of the percentages elected for all of the TSP core funds must equal 100 percent.
( 2 ) The percentages elected by the participant will be applied to the balances in each source of contributions and to both traditional and Roth balances and tax-deferred and tax-exempt balances on the effective date of the fund reallocation.
( b ) A fund reallocation request has no effect on deposits made after the effective date of the fund reallocation request; subsequent deposits will continue to be allocated among the TSP core funds in accordance with the participant's investment election made under subpart B of this part.
( c ) If a fund reallocation is found to be invalid pursuant to § 1601.34, the purported fund reallocation will not be made.
### ^EB^TMENIO F J • iANSPpRlATIO N -•^Kf: TOPERATIONS

. SERVE D OCTOBE R 12 , 201 0 ZGi O OC T ! 3 P 12

: Ob

U S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C
I N TH E MATTE RO F 

### FEDERA L EXPRES S CORPORATIO N FA A DOCKE T N o CP10SW000 7 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S FAA-2010-053 3 ORDE R O F DISMISSA L Th e Complain t

of Complainan t

Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (hereinafte r "Complainant" ) wa s file do n May 20 , 2010
. Responden t Federa l Expres s Corporatio n (hereinafte r

"Respondent" ) ha dfile daReques t fo r Hearin g o n Ma y 4 , 2010
. O n Octobe r

6 , 2010 , Responden t

withdre w it s Reques t

for Hearin g an drequeste d dismissal , citin g settlement
. 1 4 C.F.R
. § 13.21 5 states : "A t an y tim e befor e o r

durin g ahearing , an agenc y attorne y ma y withdra w acomplain t o r part y ma y withdra w areques t fo r ahearin g withou t th e consen t

of th e administrativ e law judge
. I f an agenc y attorne y withdraw s th e complain t

o r apart y withdraw s th e reques t fo r ahearin g an dth e answer , th e administrativ e la w judg e shal l dismis s th e proceeding s unde r thi s subpart withprejudice. " WHEREFORE , th e withi n file dWithdrawa l o f Reques t for Hearin g havin g bee n rea dan dconsidered , i t

i s ORDERE D a s follows : 1
. Respondent' s Withdrawa l of Reques t for Hearin g b e an di s hereb y granted ; an d2
. Thi s proceedin g b e an di s hereb y dismisse dwithprejudice
.

Richar dC
. Goodwi n U.S
. Administrativ e Law Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No
. CP10SW000 7 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Courtne y E
. Felts , Respondent' s Counse l Staf f Attorney , Federa l Express , Inc
. 362 0 Hack s Cros s Roa d Buildin g B , 3'' ' Floo r Memphis , TN 38125-880 0 TEL : 901-434-863 2 FAX : 901-434-828 3 Jame s Archier , Complainant' s Counse l Attomey , Offic e o f

Regiona l Counse l Soutl^wes t

Region , ASW-7G 5 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 260 1 MeachamBoulevar d For t Worth , TX 76137-429 8 TEL : 817-222-507 4 FAX : 817-222-5945/509 2 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attomey-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue, S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000, Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.