alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 4.1 Boarding of vessels. ( a ) Every vessel arriving at a CBP port will be subject to such supervision while in port as the port director considers necessary. The port director may detail CBP officers to remain on board a vessel to secure enforcement of the requirements set forth in this part. CBP may determine to board as many vessels as considered necessary to ensure compliance with the laws it enforces.
( b ) ( 1 ) No person, with or without the consent of the master, except a pilot in connection with the navigation of the vessel, personnel from another vessel in connection with the navigation of an unmanned barge, an officer of CBP or the Coast Guard, an immigration or health officer, an inspector of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, or an agent of the vessel or consular officer exclusively for purposes relating to customs formalities, shall go on board any vessel arriving from outside the customs territory of the United States without permission of the port director or the CBP officer in charge until the vessel has been taken in charge by a CBP officer.
( 2 ) A person may leave the vessel for the purpose of reporting its arrival as required by law (see § 4.2), but no other person, except those designated in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, shall leave any vessel arriving from outside the customs territory of the United States, with or without the consent of the master, without the permission of the port director or the CBP officer in charge until the vessel has been properly inspected by CBP and brought into the dock or anchorage at which cargo is to be unladen and until all passengers have been landed from the vessel (19 U.S.C. 1433).
( 3 ) Every person permitted to go on board or to leave without the consent of a CBP officer under the provisions of this paragraph shall be subject to CBP and quarantine regulations.
( 4 ) The master of any vessel shall not authorize the boarding or leaving of his vessel by any person in violation of this paragraph.
( c ) Persons seeking to board an incoming vessel after it has been inspected by the quarantine authorities and taken in charge by a CBP officer must comply with any applicable Coast Guard regulations regarding the Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC)/personal identification requirements as prescribed in 33 CFR 101.105 and 101.514-515.
( d ) No person in charge of a tugboat, rowboat, or other vessel shall bring such conveyance alongside an incoming vessel heretofore described and put on board thereof any person, except as authorized by law or regulations.
[28 FR 14596, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 78-141, 43 FR 22174, May 24, 1978; T.D. 82-224, 47 FR 35475, Aug. 16, 1982; T.D. 92-74, 57 FR 35751, Aug. 11, 1992; T.D. 95-77, 60 FR 50010, Sept. 27, 1995; T.D. 00-4, 65 FR 2872, Jan. 19, 2000; CBP Dec. 14-11, 79 FR 70464, Nov. 26, 2014] Footnotes -
4.1
[1-27] [Reserved]
### §61f–7. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 61f–7 was editorially reclassified as section 6597 of this title.
### **CHAPTER 75—REQUIREMENTS FOR SINGLE AUDITS**

Sec.
7501.
Definitions.
7502.
Audit requirements; exemptions.
7503.
Relation to other audit requirements.
7504.
Federal agency responsibilities and relations with non-Federal entities.
7505.
Regulations.
7506.
Effective date.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2016**—Pub. L. 114–301, §2(a)(2), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1514, added item 7506 and struck out former items 7506 "Monitoring responsibilities of the Comptroller General" and 7507 "Effective date".

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–156, §2, July 5, 1996, 110 Stat. 1396, amended chapter analysis generally, substituting in item 7504 "Federal agency responsibilities and relations with non-Federal entities" for "Cognizant agency responsibilities" and in item 7507 "Effective date" for "Effective date; report".
-88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

▲

▲ ★

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲ ▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/03

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 03 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL

■

■ ★

■

■

★

■ ■

■

■

● ★

●

● ●

★

● ● ● ●
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>        0001046777
<NAME>       Burke Industries, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-1999
<CASH>                                           2,981
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,921
<ALLOWANCES>                                       812
<INVENTORY>                                     14,574
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,677
<PP&E>                                          31,315
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,731
<BONDS>                                        140,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           18,160
<PREFERRED>                                      3,000
<COMMON>                                        25,464
<OTHER-SE>                                   (113,936)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,945
<SALES>                                        107,019
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               107,019
<CGS>                                           77,053
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   77,053
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,761
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   196
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    190
<INCOME-TAX>                                       160
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 30
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        30
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Nan R. Patterson, Respondent-Appellant, v. Jerome Patterson, Appellant-Respondent.

In an action for divorce, order denying plaintiff’s motion to amend the final decree modified by striking out everything following the words “ hereby is ” and by substituting in place thereof a paragraph providing that the motion be granted to the extent of directing an addition to the final decree of a decretal paragraph stating that inasmuch as the plaintiff has furnished proof of the sale of the Scarsdale property the defendant shall pay the plaintiff $350 per month commencing December 12, 1947. As thus modified, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs and without prejudice to any further application, as plaintiff may be advised. We construe the final decree as requiring an increase in the award as of the date of proof of sale of the real property; and we hold that plaintiff’s affidavit herein is sufficient proof. The papers do not disclose grounds for a further increase in the award. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4

                   FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


        This Agreement shall constitute the First Amendment to Employment
Agreement originally dated as of June 1, 1995 by and between St. John Knits,
Inc., a California corporation (the "Company") and Robert E. Gray (the
"Executive").


                                  AMENDMENT

        The Company and Executive hereby agree to extend the Term of the
original Employment Agreement for an additional period of one year, so that the
Employment Agreement shall now terminate as of May 31, 1999. The Company and
Executive hereby agree that all other terms of the Employment Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect without modification.

        EXECUTED as of May 2, 1997 at Orange County, California. 


                                       "COMPANY"

                                       ST. JOHN KNITS, INC.,
                                       a California corporation

                                       By: /s/ ROGER G. RUPPERT
                                          ---------------------
                                           Roger G. Ruppert


                                       "EXECUTIVE"

                                        /s/ ROBERT E. GRAY
                                       -------------------
                                        Robert E. Gray
#### In the Matter of Singer Sewing Machine Company, Respondent, against George Starke, as a City Marshal of the City of New York, Respondent, and Benjamin Levitas, Intervener, Appellant.

Present — Glennon, J. P., Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See 278 App. Div. 902.]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-10060-CIV-KING/REID

ERIC LEE KINCAID,

Plaintiff,

v.

MONROE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER,

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER AFFIRMING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

AND DISMISSING CASE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the filing of a Report of Magistrate

Judge Lisette M. Reid (D.E. #8) filed October 14, 2020, in the above-styled case.

Accordingly, upon review of the record, it is hereby

ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:

1) That the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation be, and the same is

hereby, AFFIRMED.

2) That any pending motions are hereby DENIED AS MOOT.

3) That the above-styled case be, and the same is hereby DISMISSED,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

4) That the Clerk shall CLOSE this case.

Case 4:20-cv-10060-JLK Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/15/2020 Page 1 of 2
DONE and ORDERED in chambers at the James Lawrence King Federal Justice

Building and United States Courthouse, Miami, Florida, this 15 day of October, 2020. th

 

 JAMES LAWRENCE KING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid 

Eric Lee Kincaid, Pro Se

19019539

Monroe County Jail

Inmate Mail/Parcels

5501 College Road

Key West, FL 33040

Case 4:20-cv-10060-JLK Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/15/2020 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Getty
Images, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Thomas Oberdorf, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 12, 2007



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|/S/    THOMAS OBERDORF                                           
|Thomas Oberdorf Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
§ 1201.35 Substituting parties. ( a ) If an appellant dies or is otherwise unable to pursue the appeal, the processing of the appeal will only be completed upon substitution of a proper party. Substitution will not be permitted where the interests of the appellant have terminated because of the appellant's death or other disability.
( b ) The representative or proper party must file a motion for substitution within 90 days after the death or other disabling event, except for good cause shown.
( c ) In the absence of a timely substitution of a party, the processing of the appeal may continue if the interests of the proper party will not be prejudiced.
122 STAT. 2318 PUBLIC LAW 110–250—JUNE 26, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1245: 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 110–237 (Comm. on Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 153 (2007): Dec. 12, considered and passed Senate. 

Vol. 154 (2008): June 9, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–250 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To reform mutual aid agreements for the National Capital Region. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REFORM OF MUTUAL AID AGREEMENTS FOR THE 

NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION. 

Section 7302 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (42 U.S.C. 5196 note) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘, including its agents 

or authorized volunteers,’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘or town’’ and all 

that follows and inserting ‘‘town, or other governmental 

agency, governmental authority, or governmental institution with the power to sue or be sued in its own name, 

within the National Capital Region.’’; 

(2) in subsection (b)(1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘, the Washington Metropolitan Area 

Transit Authority, the Metropolitan Washington Airports 

Authority, and any other governmental agency or authority’’; 

and 

(3) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘or employees’’ each place 

that term appears and inserting ‘‘, employees, or agents’’. 

Approved June 26, 2008. 

June 26, 2008 

[S. 1245] 


dkrause on GSDDPC44 with PUBLIC LAWS
Case 1:20-cv-23463-MGC   Document 11   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2020   Page 1 of 8

Case 1:20-cv-23463-MGC   Document 11   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2020   Page 2 of 8

Case 1:20-cv-23463-MGC   Document 11   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2020   Page 3 of 8

Case 1:20-cv-23463-MGC   Document 11   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2020   Page 4 of 8

Case 1:20-cv-23463-MGC   Document 11   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2020   Page 5 of 8

Case 1:20-cv-23463-MGC   Document 11   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2020   Page 6 of 8

Case 1:20-cv-23463-MGC   Document 11   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2020   Page 7 of 8

Case 1:20-cv-23463-MGC   Document 11   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2020   Page 8 of 8
Filed 9/25/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2012 ND 191

In the Matter of Darl John Hehn 

----------------------------------

A.W. Stokes, Richland County 

State’s Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee

v.

Darl John Hehn, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20120070

Appeal from the District Court of Richland County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable John T. Paulson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Jonathan R. Byers, Special Assistant State’s Attorney, Office of Attorney General, 600 E. Boulevard Ave., Bismarck, N.D. 58505-0040, for petitioner and appellee.

Don R. Krassin, 120 S. 1st St., Wahpeton, N.D. 58075, for respondent and appellant.

Matter of Hehn

No. 20120070

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Hehn appeals from a trial court order denying his request for discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual.  Hehn argues the State did not prove he is likely to engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct and has serious difficulty controlling his behavior.  We conclude the trial court’s order is supported by clear and convincing evidence, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
GATEWAY 2000, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS 
ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                        547,252
<SECURITIES>                                    8,985 
<RECEIVABLES>                                 442,978 
<ALLOWANCES>                                   23,006 
<INVENTORY>                                   314,954 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,397,644       
<PP&E>                                        450,781      
<DEPRECIATION>                                125,711    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,775,790      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         830,540    
<BONDS>                                         6,599  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                          768 
<OTHER-SE>                                    882,306       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,775,790         
<SALES>                                     1,419,336          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,419,336          
<CGS>                                       1,153,543          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               1,153,543          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                1,184      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                165       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               103,078       
<INCOME-TAX>                                   35,562      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            67,516      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                   67,516 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.86 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0 
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13a-15 OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of U.S. Can Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions);
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Philip R. Mengel
#### § 12.60 Importation prohibited.

The transportation, importation, sale, or possession of the skins of fur seals or sea otters is prohibited if such skins were taken contrary to the provisions of section 2 of the act of February 26, 1944 (58 Stat. 100-104) or, the case of such skins taken under the authority of the act or any fur-seal agreement, if the skins are not officially marked and certified as required by section 2 of the act. Section 16 makes the act inapplicable to skins taken for scientific purposes under a special permit.

[28 FR 14710, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51253, Dec. 21, 1988]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-057 May 12, 2004

NRC ESTABLISHES WEB PAGE FOR INFORMATION ON

CURRENT TECHNICAL ISSUES AT VERMONT YANKEE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has established a page on the agency’s Web site to

consolidate information on technical issues at the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant, including

Entergy Nuclear’s application to increase the plant’s power output by 20 percent.

The page includes correspondence both to and from the NRC concerning the uprate, spent fuel

pool inventory and other issues. Links on the page provide information on issues such as public

meetings and opportunities for public participation in the uprate review process. The page also

includes a link to the NRC’s review standard for extended power uprates. Information on other

technical issues at Vermont Yankee will be added to the page as necessary.

The page’s address on the NRC web site is: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/plant-specific-items/vermont-yankee-issues.html .

###