# SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

Staff Report



# SCAQMD 8-Hour Ozone Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) State Implementation Plan (SIP) Demonstration

June 2006

Deputy Executive Officer Planning, Rule Development, and Area Sources Elaine Chang, DrPH

Assistant Deputy Executive Officer Planning, Rule Development, and Area Sources Laki Tisopulos, Ph.D., P.E.

Planning Manager Planning, Rule Development, and Area Sources

Joe Cassmassi

Author Minh Pham, P.E. – Air Quality Specialist

Reviewed By Ed Eckerle – Program Supervisor Barbara Baird – Principal Deputy District Counsel

SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

GOVERNING BOARD

## Chairman: WILLIAM A. BURKE, Ed.D. Speaker of the Assembly Appointee

Vice Chairman: S. ROY WILSON, Ed.D. Supervisor, Fourth District Riverside County Representative
MEMBERS:

MICHAEL D. ANTONOVICH Supervisor, Fifth District Los Angeles County Representative

JANE W. CARNEY Senate Rules Committee Appointee

BEATRICE J. S. LAPISTO-KIRTLEY Mayor, City of Bradbury Cities Representative, Los Angeles County/Eastern R egion

RONALD O. LOVERIDGE Mayor, City of Riverside Cities Representative, Riverside County

GARY OVITT Supervisor, Fourth District San Bernardino County Representative

JAN PERRY Councilmember, City of Los Angeles Cities Representative, Los Angeles County, Western Region

MIGUEL PULIDO Mayor, City of Santa Ana Cities Representative, Orange County

WILLIAM S. CRAYCRAFT Council Member, City of Mission Viejo Cities Representative, Orange County

JAMES W. SILVA Supervisor, Second District Orange County Representative

CYNTHIA VERDUGO-PERALTA Governor’s Appointee

DENNIS YATES Mayor, City of Chino Cities Representative, San Bernadino County

EXECUTIVE OFFICER: BARRY R. WALLERSTEIN, D.Env.

# Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION .......................................

................................................... ..............................................1

EPA REGION IX GUIDANCE .............................

................................................... ...................................3

DISTRICT APPROACH AND EVALUATION ...................

................................................... ..................4

O VERVIEW OF 

### SCAQMD P ROGRAM



### ................................................... ................................................... .....4

D ISTRICT 

### ’ S 

### A PPROACH AND 

### E VALUATION



### ................................................... ...............................................5

CONCLUSIONS ........................................

................................................... ................................................9

APPENDIX 1 - SIP-APPROVED RULES, FEDERAL CTGS-ACTS & BEYOND RACT RULES ..10

T ABLE 

### 1-1: L IST OF 

### SCAQMD SIP-R ULES



### , CTG S 

### -ACT S



### , AND 

### B EYOND 

### RACT R ULES 

### .........................12

T ABLE 

### 1-2: L IST OF 

### F EDERAL 

### CTG S AND 

### D ISTRICT 

### R ULES



### ................................................... ...................22

T ABLE 

### 1-3: L IST OF 

### F EDERAL 

### ACT S AND 

### D ISTRICT 

### R ULES



### ................................................... ...................25

APPENDIX 2 - RACT ANALYSIS FOR GROUP I RULES.......

................................................... ........29

R ULE 

### 1106

- M ARINE 

### C OATING 

### O PERATIONS 

### (A MENDED 

### 1/13/95)........................................... ................31

R ULE 

### 1117

- E MISSIONS OF 

### O XIDES OF 

### N ITROGEN FROM 

### G LASS 

### M ELTING 

### F URNACES 

### (A MENDED 

### 1/6/84)

................................................... ................................................... ................................................... .........32

R ULE 

### 1136

– W OOD 

### P RODUCTS 

### C OATING 

### (A MENDED 

### 6/14/96) ........................................... .....................33

R ULE 

### 1153

- C OMMERCIAL 

### B AKERY 

### O VENS 

### (A MENDED 

### 1/13/95)........................................... ..................34

R ULE 

### 1159

– N ITRIC 

### A CID 

### U NITS



### – O XIDES OF 

### N ITROGEN 

### (A DOPTED 

### 12/6/85) ........................................35

R ULE 

### 1173

- F UGITIVE 

### E MISSIONS OF 

### V OLATILE 

### O RGANIC 

### C OMPOUNDS 

### (A MENDED 

### 12/6/02).................36

R ULE 

### 1176

- S UMPS AND 

### W ASTEWATER 

### S EPARATORS 

### (A MENDED 

### 9/13/96) ........................................... ..38

APPENDIX 3 - RACT ANALYSIS FOR GROUP II RULES ......

................................................... .......39

R ULE 

### 461

– G ASOLINE 

### T RANSFER AND 

### D ISPENSING 

### (A MENDED 

### 6/3/05)............................................ .......41

R ULE 

### 463

– O RGANIC 

### L IQUID 

### S TORAGE 

### (A MENDED 

### 5/6/05) ............................................ .........................41

R ULE 

### 1107

– C OATING OF 

### M ETAL 

### P ARTS AND 

### P RODUCTS 

### (A MENDED 

### 1/6/06)..........................................41

R ULE 

### 1113

– A RCHITECTURAL 

### C OATINGS 

### (A MENDED 

### 7/9/04)............................................ ......................42

R ULE 

### 1121

– C ONTROL OF 

### N ITROGEN 

### O XIDES FROM 

### R ESIDENTIAL 

### T YPE



### , N ATURAL 

### G AS 

### -F IRED 

### W ATER



### H EATERS 

### (A MENDED 

### 9/3/04)............................................

................................................... ......................42

R ULE 

### 1145

– P LASTIC



### , R UBBER



### , L EATHER AND 

### G LASS 

### C OATINGS 

### (A MENDED 

### 12/3/04)...........................43

R ULE 

### 1146.2

– E MISSIONS OF 

### O XIDES OF 

### N ITROGEN FROM 

### L ARGE 

### W ATER 

### H EATERS AND 

### S MALL 

### B OILERS 

### (A MENDED 

### 1/7/05) ............................................

................................................... .....................................43

R ULE 

### 1151

– M OTOR 

### V EHICLE AND 

### M OBILE 

### E QUIPMENT 

### N ON 

### -A SSEMBLY 

### L INE 

### C OATING 

### O PERATIONS 

### (A MENDED 

### 12/2/05) ...........................................

................................................... ....................................43

R ULE 

### 1162

– P OLYESTER 

### R ESIN 

### O PERATIONS 

### (A MENDED 

### 7/8/05) ............................................ ................44

R ULE 

### 1166

– V OLATILE 

### O RGANIC 

### C OMPOUND 

### E MISSIONS FROM 

### D ECONTAMINATION OF 

### S OIL 

### (A MENDED 

### 5/11/01)...........................................

................................................... ................................................... ....45

R ULE 

### 1168

– A DHESIVE AND 

### S EALANT 

### A PPLICATIONS 

### (A MENDED 

### 1/7/05)............................................ ...45

R ULE 

### 1171

– S OLVENT 

### C LEANING 

### O PERATIONS 

### (A MENDED 

### 5/6/05)............................................ .............46

APPENDIX 4 - RACT ANALYSIS FOR GROUP III RULES.....

................................................... .......47

R ULE 

### 462

– O RGANIC 

### L IQUID 

### L OADING 

### (A MENDED 

### 5/14/99) ........................................... ........................50

R ULE 

### 1109

– E MISSIONS OF 

### O XIDES OF 

### N ITROGEN FROM 

### B OILERS AND 

### P ROCESS 

### H EATERS IN 

### P ETROLEUM



### R EFINERIES 

### (A MENDED 

### 8/5/88)............................................

................................................... ..................53

R ULE 

### 1110.2

– E MISSIONS FROM 

### G ASEOUS AND 

### L IQUID 

### -F UELED 

### E NGINES 

### (A MENDED 

### 6/3/05)................54

R ULE 

### 1118

– C ONTROL OF 

### E MISSIONS FROM 

### R EFINERY 

### F LARES 

### (A MENDED 

### 11/4/05) ..............................57

R ULE 

### 1133.2

– E MISSION 

### R EDUCTIONS FROM 

### C O 

### -C OMPOSTING 

### O PERATIONS 

### (A DOPTED 

### 1/10/03) ..........58

R ULE 

### 1163

– C ONTROL OF 

### V INYL 

### C HLORIDE 

### E MISSIONS 

### (A MENDED 

### 6/7/85) ...........................................5 9

APPENDIX 5 - MAJOR SOURCE FACILITIES ...............

................................................... .................60

T ABLE 

### 5-1: L IST OF 

### T ITLE 

### V F ACILITIES



### ................................................... .................................................61

T ABLE 

### 5-2: E XAMPLE OF 

### I NFORMATION 

### A VAILABLE 

### F OR 

### T ITLE 

### V F ACILITY 

### ...........................................79

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ ___________________________________ Introduction 1 June 2006 

# Introduction

On April 30, 2004 (69 FR 23951), the U.S. EPA publi shed a final rule that addressed the

classifications for the 8-hour ozone National Ambie nt Air Quality Standard (NAAQS), the revocation of the 1-hour ozone NAAQS, the attainmen t dates, and the timing of emissions reductions. With regards to the 8-hour ozone NAAQS , the South Coast AQMD is classified as “Subpart 2/Severe 17” category and th e Coachella Valley located in Riverside County is classified as “Subpart 2/Seriou s category.” 1 

## As Subpart 2 category, in addition to revising the SIP to include additional control measures to address the 8-hour ozone, and conducting attainment demonstrations thr ough regional modeling, CARB (or essentially SCAQMD) is required to submit a RACT SI P Submittal to EPA to

demonstrate that their current rules fulfill the 8- hour ozone RACT for all CTG source categories. CARB must assure that RACT is met, eit her through 1) a certification that previously required RACT controls for 1-hour ozone also represent RACT for 8-hour ozone, or 2) a new RACT determination. The RACT SI P Submittal must be submitted by CARB to EPA by September 15, 2006 2 

## , and as such SCAQMD staff must submit the analysis to CARB for review by July 15, 2006.

Previously the South Coast Air Basin (Basin) was cl assified as an “extreme” nonattainment area for 1-hour ozone. The Clean Air Ac t (CAA), Section 172 (c)(1) 3 

## and the California Health and Safety Code (H&SC) Section 40 460(a) and 40913, require the SCAQMD to adopt an Air Quality Management Plan (AQM P) containing reasonably available control measures (RACM) and reasonably av ailable control technology (RACT) to bring the Basin into attainment as expeditiously as practicable. In addition, the H&SC Section 40440(a) requires the AQMD to adopt rules a nd regulations to implement the AQMP. The plan, rules, and regulations are the pri ncipal components of the Basin’s State Implementation Plan (SIP) which must be reviewed by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Once approved by CARB and EPA, SIP becomes a legally binding documen t for the SCAQMD to lead the Basin into attainment with the NAAQS.

Section 182 of the CAA specifies the requirements f or the AQMP and schedules of

submittal and revision. Non-attainment areas class ified as marginal and moderate are required to implement RACT for all major sources of VOC 4 

## . RACT is defined by the

1 

### 40 CFR 81.305, effective on June 15, 2004

2 

### Federal Register, Volume 70, Citation 71612, Novemb er 29, 2005

3 

### Excerpt of Section 172(c)(1),

“ Such plan provisions shall provide for the implemen tation of all reasonably available control measures as expediously as practicable (including s uch reductions in emissions from existing sources i n the area as may be obtained through the adoption, a t a minimum, of reasonable available control technology) and shall provide for attainment of the national primary ambient air quality standards.”

4 

### Excerpt of Section 182(b)(2),

“ REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY – The State shall submit a revision to the applicable implementation plan to include provision s to require the implementation of reasonably available control technology under section 172(c)(1 ) with respect to each of the following: (A) Each category of VOC sources in the area covered by a CTG document issued by the Administrator between the date of the enactment of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 and the date of attainment.

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ ___________________________________ Introduction 2 June 2006 

## EPA as the lowest emission limit that a particular source is capable of meeting through the application of control technology that is reasonabl y achievable considering technological and economic feasibility. 5 

## Non-attainment areas classified as serious, sever e, or extreme have additional requirements above and beyond VOC R ACT. Section 182(e)(5) 6 

## and Section 182(f) 7 

## call for the implementation of above RACT for both VOC and NOx sources, since both VOC and NOx are precursors of o zone.

To establish a “presumptive” RACT level across the nation, Section 183 of the CAA requires the EPA to develop several Control Techniq ues Guidelines (CTG) for VOC sources, and Alternative Control Techniques (ACT) d ocuments for VOC and NOx sources. Most of the CTG documents were issued pri or to 1990, and most of the ACT

documents were issued in the mid-1990s. The CTG do cuments contain mandated emission standards and work practices whereas the A TC documents contain recommended measures, but not mandated. The EPA is also requir ed to revise and update these documents as new or updated information becomes ava ilable.

To facilitate the development of the RACT SIP Submi ttal for the 8-hour ozone, the EPA Region IX issued a guidance letter 8 

## which specifies the areas of information that EPA is looking for in a minimally acceptable RACT SIP Subm ittal. In addition, the EPA Region IX published a list of CTG/ATCs 9 

## and provided SCAQMD staff with all electronic CTG/ATC documents, and a suggested language for “Ne gative Declarations” 10 

## . The fivestep guidance of EPA Region IX, and the approach of SCAQMD staff are presented

below.

(B) All VOC sources in the area covered by any CTG issu ed before the date of the enactment of

the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. (C) All other major stationary sources of VOCs located in the area. ”

5 

### 44 FR 53762, September 17, 1979

6 

### Excerpt of Section 182(e)(5), “NEW TECHNOLOGIES – The Administrator may, in accor dance with section 110, approve provisions of an implementation plan for an Extreme Area which anticipate development of new control techniques or improvement of existing control technologies, an d an attainment demonstration based on such provisions,...”

7 

### Excerpt of Section 182(f), “NOx REQUIREMENTS – (1) The plan provisions require d under this subpart for major stationary sources of volatile organic compounds shall also ap ply to major stationary sources .... of oxides of nitrogen”

8 

### Letter from Andrew Steckel to Kurt Karperos, titled “RACT SIPs”, March 9, 2006.

9 

### Letter from Andrew Steckel to Kurt Karperos, titled “RACT SIPs”, April 4, 2006, with a list of CTGs an d ACTs provided by Stanley Tong

10 

### Letter from Andrew Steckel to Kurt Karperos, titled “Sample Language for Negative Declaration for use with 8-hour Ozone Reasonably Available Control Tech nology – State Implementation Plan (RACT SIP) Certification”, May 25, 2006

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ ___________________________________ EPA Region IX Guidance 3 June 2006



# EPA Region IX Guidance

The five-step guidance of EPA Region IX is presente d below.

1. Describe efforts to identify all source categories within the District requiring RACT, including CTG sources (i.e., covered by an EPA Cont rol Technique Guideline document) and major non-CTG sources.

2. Submit negative declarations where there are no fac ilities (major or minor) within the District subject to a CTG.

3. For all categories needing RACT, list the state/loc al regulation that implements RACT. It may also be helpful to list the date EPA a pproved these regulations as fulfilling RACT.

4. Describe the basis for concluding that the regulati ons fulfill RACT. Documents useful in establishing RACT include CTGs, Alternative Cont rol Technique guidance (ACT), Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standa rds, New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), California Suggested Control Measures (SCM) and RACT/Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BA RCT) determinations, regulations adopted in other Districts, and guidanc e and rules developed by other state and local agencies.

5. We understand that some Districts may use CAPCOA’s September 2003 Potential All Feasible Measures (AFM) Report to help demonstr ate RACT. If so, the RACT SIP should certify that local regulations are equiv alent to AFM, justify the assumption that the AFM fulfilled RACT in 2003, and include so me sort of certification/demonstration that no additional cont rols have become more reasonably

available since then.

The list of CTG/ATCs provided by EPA Region IX is i n Table 1-2 and 1-3 of Appendix 1 of this Staff Report. There are 26 CTG and 28 ACT source categories. The major sources that are not covered by the CTG are called major non-CTG sources.

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ __________________________________________ District’s Approach and Evaluation 4 June 2006



# District Approach and Evaluation

Overview of SCAQMD Program

The EPA approved the 1997 South Coast Air Quality M anagement Plan (AQMP) for ozone, as revised by a 1999 amendment, on April 10, 2000 11 

## . The EPA is in the process of reviewing the 2003 AQMP. To implement the reasonably available c ontrol measures in the AQMP, the SCAQMD staff develops and implements the South Coas t AQMD Rules and Regulations, which include Regulation I through Regulation XXXI. Spec ifically, the rules and regulations that regulate stationary sources are:

 Regulation IV – Prohibitions, and Regulation XI – S ource Specific Rules, contain rules with emission standards and work practices developed to implement the AQMP control measures;

 Regulation IX - Standards of Performance for New St ationary Sources (NSPS), and Regulation X - National Emission Standards for Haza rdous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) contain all federal rules which were developed by E PA. These rules meet RACT and were adopted by references, without changes, by SCAQMD;

 Regulation XX - RECLAIM, contains requirements such as periodic monitoring or recordkeeping to enhance the source’s compliance wi th Regulation IV and XI; and

 Regulation XXX – Title V Permits to implement the F ederal Operating Permit Program.

Since Regulation IX and X are at the level of RACT or better, Regulation XX is considered by EPA as meeting RACT 12 

## , and Regulation XXX are essentially Federal Operat ing Permit Program, SCAQMD staff focused on reviewing the NOx and VOC rules in Regulation IV and XI

for this RACT SIP Submittal.

Every single AQMP, rule and regulation is carefully reviewed and scrutinized through a threetier review process by SCAQMD, CARB, EPA staff, as well as the public. Tier 1 review is conducted by SCAQMD staff. By law, SCAQMD staff mu st develop regulations and rules to meet, at a minimum, the RACT or RACM requirements. SCAQMD staff must review all related CTGs and ACTs published at the time they develop a source-specific rule. As part of the rule development process, SCAQMD staff is required to an alyze all CARB and EPA publications and studies including the CTGs and the Air Toxics Contr ol Measures (ATCMs) to assess the feasibility and costs of the control techniques. 13 

## Furthermore, under the requirement of H&S Code Section 40727.2, SCAQMD staff is required to p erform a Comparative Analysis comparing the requirements of the proposed rule with the requ irements of other local, state and federal regulations, including but not limited to, the emis sion standards, and the use of Best Available

11 

### Citation 65 FR 18903

12 

### In developing the most recent versions of Regulatio n XX, staff has determined that Regulation XX meets BARCT, which is above and beyond RACT. EPA is prop osing to approve Regulation XX into SIP. Citation 71 FR

28290.

13 

### SCAQMD Rule Development Manual

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ __________________________________________ District’s Approach and Evaluation 5 June 2006 

## Control Technologies for new or modified equipment (BACT or BARCT), that apply to the same equipment or source type.

After regulations and rules are adopted by the Gove rning Board, they are submitted to CARB

and EPA for review and inclusion into SIP. CARB an d EPA must evaluate these documents to ensure that they meet the requirements in the feder al and California CAA. CARB and EPA have developed, published, and updated many CTGs and ACT s and are knowledgeable of the minimum RACT requirements. 14 

## Their staff is required to assess RACT/BARCT prio r to approval any SCAQMD submittals into SIP. 15 

## In addition, each of these three tier reviews mus t go through intensive public notification and partic ipation.

With the independent review in this three-tier proc ess by SCAQMD, CARB and EPA, and the public participation, any document that is adopted by SCAQMD and is subsequently approved by CARB and EPA, should be considered as meeting th e minimum “presumptive” RACT.



# District’s Approach and Evaluation

In order to determine that the SCAQMD rules satisfy RACT, the SCAQMD staff conducted an evaluation following the EPA Region IX guidance. E ach guidance element is presented below, followed by the specific SCAQMD approach.

EPA Guidance: Describe efforts to identify all source categorie s within the District requiring RACT, including CTG sources (i.e., covere d by an EPA Control Technique Guideline document) and major non-CTG sources.

SCAQMD Evaluation: All CTGs sources are identified in Table 1-1 (i.e. the categories with a checkmark in the column titled “On EPA Region 9’s C TG-ACT list”) and Table 1-2. Each CTG source is subject to one or more SCAQMD rules in Re gulation IV, IX, X, and XI. Non-CTG

sources are the sources without a checkmark in this column. For each non-CTG source, there is a corresponding SCAQMD rule as shown in Table 1-1.

A search was conducted of the SCAQMD permitting dat abase and a total of approximately 1,311 major source facilities having VOC or NOx emissions equal to or more than 10 tons per year

were identified. These facilities have a total of 17,607 permits. Approximately 750 of these major source facilities are Title V facilities whic h have federal enforceable permits with clearly identified SIP-approved rules. The list of 750 Tit le V facilities is included in Table 5-1 of

14 

### To aid the air districts in developing regulations to meet RACT, CARB has developed a series of RACT/B ARCT determinations in the mid 1990s: 1) Determination o f RACT for Metal Parts and Products Coating Operati ons, ARB/SSD-93-003; 2) Determination of RACT for the Co ntrol of Fugitive Emissions of VOC from Oil and Gas Production Facilities, ARB/SSD-93-002; 3) Determina tion of RACT and BARCT for Industrial, Institutiona l, and Commercial Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process H eaters, 7/18/91; 4) Determination of RACT and BARCT for Polyester Resin Operations, 1/8/91; 5) Determinatio n of RACT and BARCT for Marine Vessel Loading Opera tions, 1/8/91; 6) Determination of RACT and BARCT for Mari ne Coating Operations, 1/8/91; 7) Determination of RACT and BARCT for Organic Solvent Cleaning and Degreasi ng Operations, 7/18/91.

15 

### EPA Blue Book, Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cu tpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations, 5/25/88.

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ __________________________________________ District’s Approach and Evaluation 6 June 2006 

## Appendix 5. Table 5-2 of Appendix 5 provides an ex ample on how each permitted source in a Title V facility was associated with an applicable district rule. These rules were then compared with the list of CTGs, ACTs and district rules in T ables 1-1, 1-2 and 1-3. In the example shown in Table 5-2, this Title V facility had CTG sources corresponding to Rules 404, 405, 407, 1107 (CTG category of Metal Parts and Products), 1145 (A CT category of Plastic Parts), and Rule 1171 (ACT source).

EPA Guidance: Submit negative declarations where there are no f acilities (major or minor) within the District subject to a CTG.

SCAQMD Evaluation: By comparing the list of CTGs (and ACTs) and applic able source specific rules, and by examining the list of SIC co des for existing facilities in the district permitting database, SCAQMD staff determined that t here was at least one facility in the Basin subject to either a CTG (or ACT). One ACT: Agricul tural Pesticide Application does occur in the Basin, but is regulated by the California Depar tment of Pesticide Regulation and does not come under the control of the SCAQMD. At this time , SCAQMD staff does not plan to submit any negative declarations.

EPA Guidance : For all categories needing RACT, list the state/l ocal regulation that implements RACT. It may also be helpful to list the date EPA approved these regulations as fulfilling RACT.

SCAQMD Evaluation: Table 1-2 of Appendix 1 contains a list of CTGs dev eloped by EPA.

Table 1-3 contains a list of ACTs. For each CTG or ACT, there is a corresponding SCAQMD rule. The date of EPA approval for each rule as fu lfilling RACT is listed in Table 1-1.

In addition to the information shown in Tables 1-1 through 1-3, SCAQMD staff added three more steps described below to ensure that all categ ories met RACT 16 

## :

1) Where a CTG/ACT became available after the EPA rule approval date, SCAQMD staff

evaluated the rule and determined if the level of c ontrol provided in the new CTG/ACT was more stringent than the adopted rule. For example, SCAQMD staff evaluated Rule 1106 which was approved by EPA on July 1995, and compare d its requirements to the applicable CTG which became available on August 1996. There a re a total of 7 rules in this category. This category of rules is called Group I rules, and the evaluation for these rules is presented in Appendix 2 of the Staff Report.

2) Where the regulation approved by EPA is amended aft er the approval date, SCAQMD staff

evaluated the amendments to ensure that the amendme nt does not result in a relaxation of control. If necessary, SCAQMD staff presented anal ysis to justify that any relaxation, if made, did not interfere with the attainment date. T here were a total of 12 rules in this

16 

### Letter from Joseph Cassmassi to Andrew Steckel, tit led “8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP”, April 5, 2006.

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ __________________________________________ District’s Approach and Evaluation 7 June 2006 

## category and the evaluation for these rules is pres ented in Appendix 3 of the Staff Report. This category of rules is called Group II rules.

3) SCAQMD staff evaluated the regulations that have no t yet been approved by EPA to justify that the regulations fulfilled RACT. There are a to tal of 2 rules in this category and the evaluation for these rules is presented in Appendix 4 of the Staff Report. This category of rules is called Group III rules.

In addition to the analyses provided in Appendices 2 through 4 for Group I, II and III rules, under the requirement of Senate Bill 656 (SB 656, S her), the SCAQMD staff also provided an analysis for all of the control measures indicated as readily available, feasible, and cost-effective by CARB for particulate matter in June 2005.

EPA Guidance: Describe the basis for concluding that the regula tions fulfill RACT. Documents useful in establishing RACT include CTGs, Alternative Control Technique guidance (ACT), Maximum Achievable Control Technolo gy (MACT) standards, New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), California Sug gested Control Measures (SCM) and RACT/Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BARCT) determinations, regulations adopted in other Districts, and guidanc e and rules developed by other state and local agencies.

SCAQMD Evaluation: For each rule in Group I and Group III, SCAQMD staf f compared the emission limits or standards, monitoring, testing, recordkeeping, and work practice requirements

in the rules with those in the CTG/ACTs. If it was necessary, SCAQMD staff used information in BARCT or rules developed by other local agencies for comparison. The evaluation for Group I and III rules are presented in Appendices 2 and 4 , respectively. Group II rules did not require an evaluation under this guidance element since it was sufficient to determine that no relaxation

occurred.

It should be highlighted that all federal NSPS and NESHAP standards are adopted by references without changes to District Regulations IX and X. The assurance that all CTG sources in the District meet RACT is augmented even more because t hey are subject to the “presumptive” RACT in NSPS and NESHAP, and are locally enforced b y the District.

In order to approve a rule and regulation into the SIP, CARB and EPA have to consider if the rule and regulation meets, at a minimum, the “presu mptive” RACT level. Because of that, any rules and regulations approved by CARB and EPA to i mplement the 1-hour ozone SIP should be considered as meeting RACT at the time of approval. Therefore, any categories for which EPA has not published any additional CTG/ATC after the approval date, and for which no more stringent rule has since been adopted, should be co nsidered as meeting RACT for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. In addition, the District routinely r eviews its rules at least every three years for air quality management update, most recently in 200 3, and proposes rule amendments whenever any information comes to its attention that indicat es that a rule can be made more stringent. The

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ __________________________________________ District’s Approach and Evaluation 8 June 2006 

## fact that these two review processes have not revea led any potential for making these rules more stringent indicates that the existing rules satisfy current RACT for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS

EPA Guidance: We understand that some Districts may use CAPCOA’ s September 2003 Potential All Feasible Measures (AFM) Report t o help demonstrate RACT. If so, the RACT SIP should certify that local regul ations are equivalent to AFM, justify the assumption that the AFM fulfilled RACT in 2003, and include some sort of certification/demonstration that no additional cont rols have become more reasonably

available since then.

SCAQMD Evaluation: SCAQMD staff analyses relied on a direct comparison with the CTG/ACTs. In addition to comparing directly to CTG /ACTs, for rules such as Rule 1173 (Group I rule in Appendix 2) and Rule 462 (Group II I rule in Appendix 4), SCAQMD staff made additional comparisons to the information provided in the 2003 CAPCOA AFM.

Even though SCAQMD staff did not solely use the inf ormation in the 2003 CAPCOA AFM, it is worthwhile to justify that the information provided in the 2003 CAPCOA AFM is valid and reflects the RACT level of control. To justify the information in the 2003 CAPCOA AFM, SCAQMD staff compared the conclusions in this report to the conclusions made by the following two reports:

 The EPA document titled “Beyond VOC RACT CTG Requir ements, EPA-453/R-95-010, published in April 1995, and

 The Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO) document titled “Midwest RPO Candidate Control Measures”, published in April 200 5. Section 4 of this report, “Analysis of Reasonably Available Control Technolog y” discusses beyond RACT requirements in California.

A checkmark is provided in Table 1-1, Appendix 1, f or each District rule that was analyzed in the EPA report published in 1995, the CAPCOA report published in 2003, and the LADCO report published in 2005. Each rule that has a che ckmark represents the rule with the most stringent, above and beyond RACT requirements, desc ribed in each of these three reports. The parallel checkmarks on Table 1-1 demonstrate that t he conclusions in the 2003 CAPCOA report are commensurable with those made by EPA and LADCO.

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ __________________________________________ Conclusions 9 June 2006 

# Conclusions

Summary of SCAQMD staff’s findings:

1. All SCAQMD rules approved by CARB and EPA to implem ent the 1-hour ozone SIP fulfill

RACT for the 8-hour ozone.

2. All CTG sources in the Basin are subject to SIP-app roved rules in Regulation IV, IX, X, XI, XIII, and/or XX and therefore meet RACT requirement s.

3. All major non-CTG sources in the Basin are subject to SIP-approved rules in Regulation IV and/or Regulation XI, XIII, and/or XX and therefore meet RACT requirements.

4. There are currently no Regulation XI source-specifi c rules for agricultural pesticide applications (ACT category). However, agricultural pesticide application is regulated by the State Department of Pesticide Regulation and is not subject to SCAQMD control..

5. There are approximately 1,311 major facilities (  10 tons per year of VOC or NOx) in the Basin with approximately 17,607 permits. Approxima tely 750 of these major source

facilities are Title V facilities which have federa l enforceable permits with clearly identified SIP-approved rules.

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ __________________________________________ Appendix 1 10 June 2006 

# Appendix 1 - SIP-Approved Rules, Federal CTGs-ACTs &

Beyond RACT Rules

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ __________________________________________ Appendix 1 11 June 2006 

## List of SCAQMD SIP-Approved Rules in Table 1-1

Table 1-1 provides the information on SIP-approved rules of the SCAQMD. The first four columns of Table 1-1 provide the following informat ion

1. Rule number of each rule in Regulation IV and XI

2. Title of each rule

3. List of pollutants regulated for each rule. (The f ocus of this report is for VOC and NOx rules only since VOC and NOx are precursors of PM)

4. Date of the last amendments for each rule

After the Governing Board adopts an SCAQMD rule, SC AQMD staff sends the rule to CARB and U.S. EPA for review. Table 1-1 provides the st atus of review from EPA.

1. The column “SIP-Approved Version” provides the vers ion of the rule that is approved by EPA into SIP. This version may or may not be ident ical to the last amended version of

the rule.

2. The columns “EPA Approval Date” and “Citation” prov ide the date the U.S. EPA approved the rule into SIP, and the citation in the federal register.

Information on Federal CTGs and ACTs in Table 1-1, 1-2 and 1-3

Table 1-2 and Table 1-3 contain a list of U.S. EPA CTGs and ACTs provided to SCAQMD staff from the U.S. EPA Region IX, and corresponding SCAQ MD rules and regulations. A checkmark was put in Table 1-1, under column “On EP A Region 9’s CTG-ACT List”, for each District rule that has a correspondent CTG and/or A CT.

Information on Beyond RACT Rules in Table 1-1

Since late 1990’s, there are at least three studies that evaluate the stringency and effectiveness of the District rules and regulations:

1. EPA published a document titled “Beyond VOC RACT CT G Requirements, EPA-453/R95-010, in April 1995. A checkmark is provided in Table 1-1 for each District rule that was analyzed in this document

2. CAPCOA published a document titled “Potential All F easible Measures” in September 2003. A checkmark is provided in Table 1-1 for eac h District rule that was analyzed in

this document

3. LADCO published a document titled “Midwest RPO Cand idate Control Measures” in April 2005. Section 4 of this report, “Analysis of Reasonably Available Control Technology” discusses beyond RACT requirements in C alifornia. A checkmark is provided in Table 1-1 for each District rule that w as analyzed in this document.

The last three columns in Table 1-1 indicates wheth er any of the SCAQMD rules have been evaluated in any of the above three references.Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Appendix 112June 2006Table 1-1: List of SCAQMD SIP-Rules, CTGs-ACTs, and Beyond RACT Rules17Rule NoPollutantRule TitleLastAmendedDate(Note 1)SIPApprovedVersion(Note 2)EPAApprovalDate(Note 3)Citation(Note 4)On EPARegion9's CTGACT List(Note 5)1995EPABeyondVOCRACT &CTG(Note 6)2003CAPCOAMostStringentControlMeasures(Note 7)2005LADCOEvaluationBeyondRACT(Note 8)401 All Visible Emissions 11/9/2001 3/2/1984 1/29/1995 50 FR 3907403 PM Fugitive Dust 12/11/1998 12/11/1998 2/17/2000 55 FR 8057404 PM Particulate Matter -Concentration2/7/1986 2/7/1986 9/2/1998 63 FR 46659405 PM Solid Particulate Matter -Weight2/7/1986 2/7/1986 9/2/1998 63 FR 46659407 VOC Liquid and Gaseous AirContaminants4/2/1982 4/2/1982 11/10/1982 47 FR 50864408 All Circumvention 5/7/1976 6/14/1978 43 FR 25686409 All Combustion Contaminants 8/7/1981 8/7/1981 7/6/1982 47 FR 29231431.1 SOx Sulfur Content of GaseousFuels6/12/1998 6/12/1998 12/3/1999 64 FR 67787431.2 SOx Sulfur Content of LiquidFuels9/15/2000 5/4/1990 6/8/1999 64 FR 30396431.3 SOx Sulfur Content of FossilFuels5/7/1976 9/28/1981 46 FR 47451442 VOC Usage of Solvents 12/15/2000 12/15/2000 5/23/2002 67 FR 36105√ √443 VOC Labeling of Solvents 5/7/1976 6/14/1978 43FR 25686443.1 VOC Labeling of MaterialsContaining Organic Solvents12/5/1986 12/5/1986 9/12/2001 66 FR 47392444 PM Open Fires 12/21/2001 12/21/2001 4/8/2002 67FR 16644461 VOC Gasoline Transfer andDispensing6/3/2005 1/9/2004 2/22/2005 70 FR 8520√ √ √463 VOC Storage of Organic Liquids 5/6/2005 3/11/1994 10/23/1996 61 FR 54941√ √17Staff added footnotes to Rule 464, 466, 466.1, 467,474, 1108, 1111, 1120, 1126, 1130.1, 1142, 1146.1,1148, 1149, 1150.2, 1164, 1174, 1175, 1110.2, 1118to makeclarifications as suggested by EPA Region IX.Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Appendix 113June 2006Table 1-1 (Continued)Rule NoPollutantRule TitleLastAmendedDate(Note 1)SIPApprovedVersion(Note 2)EPAApprovalDate(Note 3)Citation(Note 4)On EPARegion9's CTGACT List(Note 5)1995EPABeyondVOCRACT &CTG(Note 6)2003CAPCOAMostStringentControlMeasures(Note 7)2005LADCOEvaluationBeyondRACT(Note 8)46418VOC Wastewater Separators 12/7/1990 12/7/1990 2/24/1997 62 FR 8172465 VOC Vacuum-Producing Devicesor Systems8/13/1999 8/13/1999 3/1/2000 65 FR 1094446619VOC Pumps and Compressors 10/7/1983 10/7/1983 1/15/1987 52 FR 1627466.118VOC Valves and Flanges 3/16/1984 5/2/1980 7/8/198247 FR 2966846718VOC Pressure Relief Devices 3/5/1982 3/5/1982 11/16/1983 48 FR 52054468 SOx Sulfur Recovery Units 10/8/1976 6/14/197843 FR 25687469 SOx Sulfuric Acid Units 2/13/1981 4/7/1976 6/14/1978 43 FR 25687470 VOC Asphalt Air Blowing 5/7/1976 6/14/1978 43FR 25687472 PM Reduction of Animal Matter 5/7/1976 6/14/1978 43 FR 2568647420NOx Fuel Burning Equipment -Oxides of Nitrogen12/4/1981 12/4/1981 7/6/1982 47 FR 29231475 NOx Electric Power GeneratingEquipment8/7/1978 10/8/1976 6/14/1978 43 FR 25687475.1 NOx Reduction of Oxides ofNitrogenCARB deleted3/27/806/14/1978 43 FR 25687481 VOC Spray Coating Operations 1/11/2002 1/11/2002 8/26/2003 68 FR 511811101 SOx Secondary LeadSmelters/Sulfur Oxides10/7/1977 9/2/1981 46 FR 439681102 VOC Petroleum Solvent DryCleaners11/17/2000 11/17/2000 7/17/2002 67 FR 46876√18Rule 1176, amended in September 13, 1996, containscurrent emission standards for waste water separators and is considered by EPA as beyond VOC RACT CTG.19Rule 1173, amended in December 6, 2002, contains current up-to-date standards for pumps, compressors,valves, flanges, and pressure relief devices and isconsidered byEPA in 1995 as beyond VOC RACT CTG and by CAPCOA in2003 as the most stringent control measure in California.20Series of Regulation XI rules, Rule 1146, 1146.1, 1146.2, and 1110.2 contain more stringent emission standards than Rule 474 and refer to those rules forRACT analysis.Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Appendix 114June 2006Table 1-1 (Continued)Rule NoPollutantRule TitleLastAmendedDate(Note 1)SIPApprovedVersion(Note 2)EPAApprovalDate(Note 3)Citation(Note 4)On EPARegion9's CTGACT List(Note 5)1995EPABeyondVOCRACT &CTG(Note 6)2003CAPCOAMostStringentControlMeasures(Note 7)2005LADCOEvaluationBeyondRACT(Note 8)1102.1 VOC Perchloroethylene DryCleaning Systems (Repealedsee rule 1421)Repealed12/9/9412/7/1990 3/24/1992 57 FR 101361103 VOC Pharmaceuticals andCosmetics Manufacturing3/12/1999 3/12/1999 7/21/1999 64 FR 39037√ √1104 VOC Wood Flat Stock CoatingOperation8/13/1999 8/13/1999 3/22/2000 65 FR 15240√ √ √1105.1 PM, NH3 Reduction of PM10 andAmmonia Emissions FromFluid Catalytic CrackingUnits11/7/2003 11/7/2003 1/4/2006 71 FR 2411105 SOx Fluid Catalytic CrackingUnits - Oxides of Sulfur9/1/1984 9/21/1984 7/12/1990 55 FR 286241106 VOC Marine Coating Operations 1/13/1995 1/13/1995 7/14/1995 60 FR 36227√1106.1 VOC Pleasure Craft CoatingOperations2/12/1999 2/12/1999 8/31/1999 64 FR 47392√1107 VOC Coating of Metal Parts andProducts1/6/2006 11/19/2001 8/13/2002 67 FR 52611√ √ √ √110821VOC Cutback Asphalt 2/1/1985 2/1/1985 7/12/1990 55FR 28624√ √1108.121VOC Emulsified Asphalt 11/4/1983 11/4/1983 1/24/1985 50 FR 3338√ √1110 NOx Emissions from StationaryInternal Combustion Engines(Demonstration)Repealed11/14/9711/6/1981 5/3/1984 49 FR 18822√21Based on EPA’s recommendation, staff will assess the inventory and potential controls related to Rule1108 and 1108.1 as part of the overall 2007 AQMP seasonal controlstrategies.Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Appendix 115June 2006Table 1-1 (Continued)Rule NoPollutantRule TitleLastAmendedDate(Note 1)SIPApprovedVersion(Note 2)EPAApprovalDate(Note 3)Citation(Note 4)On EPARegion9's CTGACT List(Note 5)1995EPABeyondVOCRACT &CTG(Note 6)2003CAPCOAMostStringentControlMeasures(Note 7)2005LADCOEvaluationBeyondRACT(Note 8)111122NOx NOx Emissions from NaturalGas-Fired, Fan-Type CentralFurnaces7/8/1983 7/8/1983 5/3/1984 49 FR 188301112 NOx Emissions of Oxides ofNitrogen from Cement Kilns6/6/1986 1/8/1984 1/7/1986 51 FR 6001112.1 PM Emissions of ParticulateMatter from Cement Kilns2/7/1986 2/7/1986 9/2/1998 63 FR 466591113 VOC Architectural Coatings 7/9/2004 11/8/19966/21/1999 64 FR 33018√ √1115 VOC Motor Vehicle Assembly LineCoating Operations5/12/1995 5/12/1995 7/14/1995 60 FR 36227√1117 NOx Emissions of Oxides ofNitrogen from Glass MeltingFurnaces1/6/1984 1/6/1984 7/12/1990 55 FR 28624√1119 SOx Petroleum Coke CalciningOperations - Oxides of Sulfur3/2/1979 3/2/1979 9/28/1981 46 FR 47451112023PM Asphalt Pavement Heaters 8/4/1978 9/28/1981 46FR 474511121 NOx Control of Nitrogen Oxidesfrom Residential Type,Natural-Gas-Fired WaterHeaters9/3/2004 12/10/1999 11/16/2001 66 FR 57666√1122 VOC Solvent Degreasers 10/1/2004 10/1/2004 2/8/2006 71 FR 6350√ √1122 VOC 10/1/2004 7/11/1997 4/2/1999 64 FR 15922√1123 VOC Refinery ProcessTurnarounds12/7/1990 12/7/1990 8/11/1992 57 FR 35758√22This rule is for residential space heating (self-contained space heater) and there is no CTG/ACT for this category. The emission standard of 40 nanograms of NOx perjoule is the most stringent limit that District staff is aware of.23Rule 1120 contains only visible emission standardsand limit for sulfur content of fuel calculated asH2S.Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Appendix 116June 2006Table 1-1 (Continued)Rule NoPollutantRule TitleLastAmendedDate(Note 1)SIPApprovedVersion(Note 2)EPAApprovalDate(Note 3)Citation(Note 4)On EPARegion9's CTGACT List(Note 5)1995EPABeyondVOCRACT &CTG(Note 6)2003CAPCOAMostStringentControlMeasures(Note 7)2005LADCOEvaluationBeyondRACT(Note 8)1124 VOC Aerospace Assembly andComponent ManufacturingOperations9/21/2001 9/21/2001 8/13/2002 67 FR 52611√ √1125 VOC Metal Container, Closure,and Coil Coating Operations1/13/1995 1/13/1995 6/13/1995 60 FR 31081√ √√112624VOC Magnet Wire CoatingOperations1/13/1995 1/13/1995 6/13/1995 60 FR 31081√1128 VOC Paper, Fabric and FilmCoating Operations3/8/1996 3/8/1996 5/4/1999 64 FR 23774√ √√1130 VOC Graphic Arts 10/8/1999 10/8/1999 9/13/200065 FR 55201√ √ √ √1130.125VOC Screen Printing Operations 12/13/1996 12/13/1996 8/21/1998 63 FR 44792√1131 VOC Food Product Manufacturingand Processing Operations6/6/2003 6/6/2003 1/22/2004 69 FR 3018√1132 VOC Further Control of VOC fromHigh Emitting Spray Booths5/7/2004 3/5/2004 4/26/2004 69 FR 22445√ √NOx Emissions of Oxides ofNitrogen from Stationary GasTurbines8/8/1997 8/8/1997 8/1/2000 65 FR 46873√1135 NOx Emissions of Oxides ofNitrogen From ElectricPower Generating Systems7/19/1991 7/19/1991 8/11/1998 63 FR 427211136 VOC Wood Products Coatings 6/14/1996 6/14/19968/18/1998 63 FR 44132√√24Staff is not aware of any significant changes in technology that affect the original RACT determination by EPA in 1995.25Staff is not aware of any significant changes in technology that affect the original RACT determination by EPA in 1996.Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Appendix 117June 2006Table 1-1 (Continued)Rule NoPollutantRule TitleLastAmendedDate(Note 1)SIPApprovedVersion(Note 2)EPAApprovalDate(Note 3)Citation(Note 4)On EPARegion9's CTGACT List(Note 5)1995EPABeyondVOCRACT &CTG(Note 6)2003CAPCOAMostStringentControlMeasures(Note 7)2005LADCOEvaluationBeyondRACT(Note 8)1137 PM PM10 Reduction FromWoodworking Operations2/1/2002 2/1/2002 1/22/2004 69 FR 30181138 PM Control Of Emissions FromRestaurant Operations11/14/1997 11/14/19977/11/2001 66 FR 361701140 PM Abrasive Blasting 8/2/1985 9/28/1981 46 FR474511141 VOC Control of Volatile OrganicCompound Emissions fromResin Manufacturing11/17/2000 11/17/20008/13/2002 67 FR 52611√1141.1 VOC Coatings and InkManufacturing11/17/2000 11/17/20002/12/2002 67 FR 6410√1141.2 VOC Surfactant Manufacturing 1/11/2002 1/11/2002 8/26/2003 68 FR 51181114226VOC Marine Tank VesselOperations7/19/1991 7/19/1991 12/13/199459 FR 641321145 VOC Plastic, Rubber, Leather andGlass Coatings12/3/2004 2/14/1997 5/4/1999 64 FR 23774√√1146 NOx Emissions of Oxides ofNitrogen from Industrial,Institutional and CommercialBoilers, Steam Generators,and Process Heaters11/17/2000 11/17/20004/8/2002 67 FR 16640√ √1146.127NOx Emissions of NOx fromSmall Industrial, Institutional,and Commercial Boilers,Steam Generators, andProcess Heaters5/13/1994 5/13/1994 9/6/1995 60 FR 46220√26Staff is not aware of any significant changes in technology that affect the original RACT determination by EPA in 1991.27Staff will amend Rule 1146.1 to lower the emissionlimits following the latest rule development in SanJoaquin and will hold a Public Hearing by end of 2006.Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Appendix 118June 2006Table 1-1 (Continued)Rule NoPollutantRule TitleLastAmendedDate(Note 1)SIPApprovedVersion(Note 2)EPAApprovalDate(Note 3)Citation(Note 4)On EPARegion9's CTGACT List(Note 5)1995EPABeyondVOCRACT &CTG(Note 6)2003CAPCOAMostStringentControlMeasures(Note 7)2005LADCOEvaluation BeyondRACT(Note 8)1146.2 NOx Emissions of Oxides ofNitrogen from Large WaterHeaters and Small Boilers1/7/2005 1/9/1998 4/8/2002 67 FR 16640√114828VOC Thermally Enhanced OilRecovery Wells11/5/1982 11/5/1982 10/19/198440 FR 41028114929VOC Storage Tank Degassing 7/14/1995 7/14/1995 8/19/1999 64 FR 451751150.1 VOC Control of GaseousEmissions from ActiveLandfills3/17/2000 3/17/2000 7/1/2002 67 FR 44062√1150.230VOC Control of GaseousEmissions from InactiveLandfills4/10/1998 10/18/1985 5/6/1997 62 FR 245741151 VOC Motor Vehicle and MobileEquipment Non-AssemblyLine Coating Operations12/2/2005 12/11/1998 5/26/2000 65 FR 34101√√1153 VOC Commercial Bakery Ovens 11/13/1995 1/13/1995 8/8/1995 60 FR 40285√1158 PM Storage, Handling andTransport of Petroleum Coke6/11/1999 6/11/1999 1/15/1987 67 FR 396161159 NOx Nitric Acid Units - Oxides ofNitrogen12/6/1985 12/6/1985 7/12/1990 55 FR 28622√1162 VOC Polyester Resin Operations 7/8/2005 11/17/2000 2/12/2002 67 FR 6410√ √116431VOC Semiconductor Manufacturing1/13/1995 1/13/1995 2/1/1996 61 FR 357928Staff is not aware of any significant changes in technology that affect the original RACT determination by EPA in 1982.29Staff is not aware of any significant changes in technology that affect the original RACT determination by EPA in 1995.30The rule is rescinded on April 10, 1998.31Staff is not aware of any significant changes in technology that affect the original RACT determination by EPA in 1995.Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Appendix 119June 2006Table 1-1 (Continued)Rule NoPollutantRule TitleLastAmendedDate(Note 1)SIPApprovedVersion(Note 2)EPAApprovalDate(Note 3)Citation(Note 4)On EPARegion9's CTGACT List(Note 5)1995EPABeyondVOCRACT &CTG(Note 6)2003CAPCOAMostStringentControlMeasures(Note 7)2005LADCOEvaluationBeyondRACT(Note 8)1166 VOC Volatile Organic CompoundEmissions fromDecontamination of Soil5/11/2001 7/14/1995 8/17/1998 63 FR 43881√1168 VOC Adhesive and SealantApplications1/7/2005 10/3/2003 12/12/2003 68 FR 69320√1171 VOC Solvent Cleaning Operations5/6/2005 11/7/2003 7/27/2004 70 FR 38023√1171 VOC Solvent Cleaning Operations11/7/2003 11/7/2003 7/27/2004 69 FR 44599√1173 VOC Fugitive Emissions ofVolatile Organic Compounds12/6/2002 5/13/1994 8/25/1994 59 FR 43751√ √ √117432VOC Control of Volatile OrganicCompound Emissions fromthe Ignition of BarbecueCharcoal10/5/1990 10/5/1990 10/4/1994 59 FR 50498117533VOC Control of Emissions fromthe Manufacture ofPolymeric Cellular (Foam)Products5/13/1994 5/13/1994 8/25/1994 59 FR 437511176 VOC Sumps and WastewaterSeparators (Amended9/13/96)9/13/1996 9/13/1996 10/7/2002 67 FR 62376√ √1178 VOC Further Reductions of VOCEmissions From StorageTanks at Petroleum Facilities12/21/2001 12/21/2001 8/26/2003 68 FR 51181√ √1179 VOC Publicly Owned TreatmentWorks Operations3/6/1992 3/6/1992 10/4/1994 59 FR 5049832Staff is not aware of any significant changes in technology that affect the original RACT determination by EPA in 1990. This is not a CTG source and nota major source.33Staff is not aware of any significant changes in technology that affect the original RACT determination by EPA in 1994.Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Appendix 120June 2006Table 1-1 (Continued)Rule NoPollutantRule TitleLastAmendedDate(Note 1)SIPApprovedVersion(Note 2)EPAApprovalDate(Note 3)Citation(Note 4)On EPARegion9's CTGACT List(Note 5)1995EPABeyondVOCRACT &CTG(Note 6)2003CAPCOAMostStringentControlMeasures(Note 7)2005LADCOEvaluationBeyondRACT(Note 8)1186 VOC Outer Continental Shelf(OCS) Air Regulations4/2/2004 9/10/1999 6/10/2000 67 FR 396161189 PM PM10 Emissions from Pavedand Unpaved Roads, andLivestock Operations1/21/2000 1/21/2000 6/8/2001 66 FR 30815√2000 NOx, SOx General 5/6/2005 5/11/2001 9/4/2003 68 FR 525122001 NOx, SOx Applicability 5/6/2005 5/11/2001 9/4/2003 68 FR 525122002 NOx, SOx Allocations for Oxides ofNitrogen (NOx) and Oxidesof Sulfur (SOx)1/7/2005 5/11/2001 9/4/2003 68 FR 525122004 NOx, SOx Requirements 5/11/2001 5/11/2001 9/4/2003 68 FR 525122005 NOx, SOx New Source Review forRECLAIM5/6/2005 4/20/2001 9/4/2003 68 FR 525122006 NOx, SOx Permits 5/11/2001 5/11/2001 9/4/200368 FR 525122007 NOx, SOx Trading Requirements 5/6/2005 12/5/2003 7/26/2004 69 FR 444612008 NOx, SOx Mobile Source Credits 10/15/1993 10/15/1993 11/8/1996 61 FR 577752010 NOx, SOx Administrative Remedies &Sanctions1/7/2005 5/11/2001 9/4/2003 68 FR 525122011 NOx Requirements for Monitoring,Reporting, andRecordkeeping for Oxides ofSulfur5/6/2005 12/5/2003 7/26/2004 69 FR 444612011 NOx 12/7/1995 6/15/1998 63 FR 326212011-2 NOx 3/16/2001 9/4/2003 68 FR 52512Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Appendix 121June 2006Table 1-1 (Continued)Rule NoPollutantRule TitleLastAmendedDate(Note 1)SIPApprovedVersion(Note 2)EPAApprovalDate(Note 3)Citation(Note 4)On EPARegion9's CTGACT List(Note 5)1995EPABeyondVOCRACT &CTG(Note 6)2003CAPCOAMostStringentControlMeasures(Note 7)2005LADCOEvaluationBeyondRACT(Note 8)2012 SOx Requirements for Monitoring,Reporting, andRecordkeeping for Sox5/6/2005 12/5/2003 7/26/2004 69 FR 444612012 SOx 12/7/1995 6/15/1998 63 FR 326212012-2 SOx 3/16/2001 9/4/2003 68 FR 525122015 NOx, SOx Backstop Provisions 6/4/2004 6/4/200412/21/2004 69 FR 764172015 NOx, SOx Backstop Provisions 5/11/2001 5/11/2001 9/4/2003 68 FR 52512Note1. "Latest Amended Date" is from SCAQMD Rule Bookas of March 31, 20062. "SIP Approved Version" is the version of a rulereviewed and approved by EPA, posted on EPA Region IXweb site as of March 31, 20063. "EPA Approval Date" is the date approved by EPA,posted on EPA Region IX web site as of March 31, 20064. “Citation” is the reference to the Federal Register posted on EPA Region IX web site as of March 31,20065. List of CTG-ATCs provided by EPA Region IX on March 24, 20066. Reference: Beyond VOC RACT CTG Requirements, EPA-453/R-95-010, and NTIS PB-95-239-4977. Reference: Potential All Feasible Measures, prepared by the CAPCOA Rules Subcommittee, September20038. Reference: Identification and Evaluation of Candidate Control Measures, LADCO, April 14, 2005

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ _______________________________________ Appendix 1 22 June 2006 

# Table 1-2: List of Federal CTGs and District Rules

General CTGs SCAQMD Rule

No

COATING & SOLVENTS

Aerospace Control of VOC Emissions from Coating Ope rations at

Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Operations CTG & MACT (See 59 FR 29216, 6/6/1994); CTG (Final), EPA-453/R-97-004, 12/97). Rule 1124

Automobile Coating Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing

Stationary Sources - Volume II: Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light

Duty Trucks, EPA-450/2-77-008, 5/77, NTIS PB-272-

445 Rule 1151

Graphic Arts Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing

Stationary Sources, Volume VIII: Graphic Arts - Rotogravure and Flexography EPA-450/2-78-033, 12/78, NTIS PB 292-490 Rule 1130

Large Appliances Control of Volatile Organic Emissi ons from Existing

Stationary Sources, Volume V: Surface Coating of Large Appliances, EPA-450/2-77-034, NTIS PB-278-

259. Rule 1107, 1132

Magnet Wire Control of Volatile Organic Emissions f rom Existing

Stationary Sources, Volume IV: Surface Coating of Insulation of Magnet Wire, EPA-450/2-77-033, 12/77,
NTIS PB-278-258 Rule 1126

Metal Coil, Container, &
Closure Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing

Stationary Sources - Volume II: Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light

Duty Trucks, EPA-450/2-77-008, 5/77, NTIS PB-272-

445. Rule 1125

Metal Furniture Control of Volatile Organic Emissio ns from Existing

Stationary Sources, Volume III: Surface Coating ofMetal Furniture, EPA-450/2-77-032, 12/77, NTIS PB278-257 Rule 1107

Metal Parts &

Products Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing

Stationary Sources, Volume VI: Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products, EPA-450/2- 78-015, 6/78, NTIS PB-286-157 Rule 1107

Paper & Fabric Control of Volatile Organic Emission s from Existing

Stationary Sources - Volume II: Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light

Duty Trucks, EPA-450/2-77-008, 5/77, NTIS PB-272-

445. Rule 1128

Ships Surface Coating Operations at Shipbuilding an d Ship

Repair Facilities, EPA-453/R-94-032, 4/94, NTIS PB- 94- 181-864). This document was superseded by the Shipbuilding CTG which was issued in 1996. Rule 1106,

1106.1

Solvent Cleaning Control of Volatile Organic Emissi ons from Solvent

Metal Cleaning, EPA-450/2-77-022, 11/77, NTIS PB274-557 Rule 1122

Rule 1171

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ _______________________________________ Appendix 1 23 June 2006 

## Table 1-2 (Continued)

General CTGs SCAQMD Rule

No Wood Coating Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing

Stationary Sources, Volume VII: Factory Surface of Flat Wood Paneling, EPA-450/2-78-032, 6/78, NTIS PB 286-

199 Rule 1104

Wood Furniture Control of VOC Emissions from Wood F urniture

Manufacturing Operations CTG-MACT draft MACT our 5-94; Final CTG, EPA-453/R-96-007, 4/96, NTIS PB-96

- 178-769, Also see 61 FR 25223 and 61 FR 50823,
9/27/96. Rule 1136

PETROLEUM

Gasoline Plants Control of Volatile Organic Emissio ns from Bulk

Gasoline Plants, EPA-450/2-77-035, 12/77, NTIS PB276-722 Rule 462

Natural
Gas/Gasoline Control of VOC Equipment Leaks from Natural

Gas/Gasoline Processing Plants, EPA-450/2-83-007, 12/83, NTIS PB-84-161-520. Rule 1173

Refineries Control of Refinery Vacuum Producing Sys tems,

Wastewater Separators, and Process Unit Turnarounds

, EPA-450/2-77-025, 10/77, NTIS PB-275-662 Rule 465

Refineries Control of VOC Leaks from Petroleum Refi nery

Equipment, EPA-450/2-78-036, 6/78, NTIS PB-286-158 Rule 1173

Service Stations Design Criteria for Stage I Vapor Control Systems -

Gasoline Service Stations, 11/75 Rule 461

Synthetic Organic
Chemical Control of VOC Emissions from Air Oxidation Process es

in Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industr y, EPA-450/3-84-015, 12/84, NTIS PB-85-164-275

Control of VOC Emissions from Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations in SOCMI, EPA-450/4-91-031, 11/15/93, NTIS PB-92-180-009 Rule 442, 40
CFR Part 60 Subpart NNN, RRR adopted by
reference without change to Regulation IX Tanks Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from St orage of

Petroleum Liquids in Fixed Roof Tanks (EPA-450/2-77

- 036, 12/77, NTIS PB-276-749), CTG.

Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Petroleu m Liquid Storage in External Floating Roof Tanks (EPA

450-2/78-047, 12/78, NTIS PB-290-579), CTG. Rule 463, 1178

Tank Trucks Control of Hydrocarbons from Tank Truck Gasoline

Loading Terminals (EPA-450/2-77-026, 12/77, NTIS PB-275-060), CTG. EPA R9 has an electronic copy.

Control of VOC Leaks from Gasoline Tank Trucks and Vapor Collection Systems (EPA-450/2-78-051, 12/78, NTIS PB-290-568), CTG. EPA R9 has an electronic

copy. Rule 461, 462

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ _______________________________________ Appendix 1 24 June 2006 

## Table 1-2 (Continued)

General CTGs SCAQMD Rule

No

OTHER

Cutback Asphalt Control of VOC from Use of Cutback Asphalt, EPA450/2-77-037, NTIS PB 278-185 Rule 1108,

1108.1
Dry Cleaning Control of VOC Emissions from Large Pe troleum Dry

Cleaners, EPA-450/3-82-009 9/82, NTIS PB-83-124-

875 Rule 1102,

1102.1

Pharmaceutical

Products Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufact ure

of Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products, EPA-450/2- 78-029, 1278, NTIS PB-290-580 Rule 1103

Polyester Resin Control of VOC Emissions from Manuf acture of HighDensity Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and Polystyren e Resins, EPA-450/3-83-008, 11/83, NTIS PB-84-134-600

Control of VOC Fugitive Emissions from Synthetic Organic Chemical Polymer and Resin Manufacturing Equipment, EPA-450/3-83-006, 3/84,NTIS PB-84-189-

372 Rule 1162

Rubber Tires Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture

of Pneumatic Rubber Tires, EPA-450/2-78-030, 12/78,
NTIS PB-290-557 Rule 442 and 40
CFR Part 60 Subpart BBB adopted by
reference without change to Regulation IX

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ _______________________________________ Appendix 1 25 June 2006 

# Table 1-3: List of Federal ACTs and District Rules

General ACTs / Other Documents SCAQMD Rule No

COATING & SOLVENTS

Coating Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from

Existing Stationary Sources, Volume I: ControlMethods for Surface Coating Operations, EPA450/2-76-028, 11/76, NTIS PB-260-386 Rule 1132

Architectural Coatings National VOC Emission Standards for

Architectural Coatings, 40 CFR 59 Subpart D,
9/11/98 Rule 1113

Automobile Coating Reduction of VOC Emissions from Automobile

Refinishing, EPA-450/3-88-009, 10/88, NTIS

PB-89-148-282

Surface Coating of Automotive/Transportationand Business Machine Plastic Parts, EPA453/R-94-017, 2/94, NTIS PB-94-158-086

Auto. Refinishing, EPA-453/R-94-031, 4/94,
NTIS PB-94-191-699. Note a national rule was
issued in 1998 after the ACT. See 40 CFR

59.100.

National VOC Emission Standards for Automobile Refinish Coatings, 40 CFR 59 Subpart B, 9/11/98 Rule 1151

Graphic Arts Offset Lithographic Printing, EPA-453/ R-94-

054, 6/94, NTIS PB-95-201-018 Rule 1130

Plastic Parts Surface Coating of Automotive/Transpo rtation

and Business Machine Plastic Parts, EPA 453/R-94-017, 2/94. Rule 1128, 1145

See references under automobile coating. Rule 1115
Solvent Cleaning Halogenated Solvent Cleaners, EPA- 450/3-89-

030, 8/89, NTIS PB-90-103-268

Industrial Cleaning Solvents, EPA-453/R-94- 015, 2/94, NTIS PB-94-156-79 Rule 1122

Rule 1171

Traffic Markings Reduction of VOC Emissions from th e

Application of Traffic Markings, EPA-450/3-88- 007, 8/88, NTIS PB-89-148-274, ACT. The

Architectural and Industrial Maintenance Coatings rule included limits for traffic markings and superseded the ACT. See 40 CFR 59.4 Rule 1113

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ _______________________________________ Appendix 1 26 June 2006 

## Table 1-3 (Continued)

General ACTs / Other Documents SCAQMD Rule No

Wood Furniture Control Techniques for Organic Emiss ions from

Plywood Veneer Dryers, EPA-450/3-83-012. May 1983. This document is labeled as a control technique document (CTD) rather than an ACT. However, the information is similar to
that in an ACT. Rule 1136

PETROLEUM

Refineries Control Technology Center Document -

Industrial Wastewater Volatile Organic Compound Emissions - Background Information for BACT/LAER Determinations, EPA-40/3-90-004, NTIS PB90-194754 Rule 1176

Service Stations Technical Guidance -- Stage II Vap or Recovery

Systems for Control of Vehicle Refueling Emissions at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities, EPA-450/3-91-022a & b, 11/91 Rule 461

Gasoline Vapor Recovery Guidelines -

Minimum SIP Requirements for EPA Region IX to Approve a Phase I or Phase II Gasoline Transfer Rule for Ozone Nonattainment Areas, EPA Region 9, 4/00 Rule 461

COMBUSTION

Boilers, Steam Generators,

Process Heaters ACT Document -- NOx Emissions from

Process Heaters (Revised), EPA-453/R-93- 034, 9/93. Rule 1146, 1146.1, 1146.2,
RECLAIM

ACT Document -- NOx Emissions from Utility

Boilers, EPA-453/R-94-023, 3/94 Rule 1146, 1146.1, 1146.2,
RECLAIM

ACT Document -- NOx Emissions from

Industrial/Commercial/Institutional (ICI) Boilers (EPA-453/R-94-022, 3/94 Rule 1146, 1146.1, 1146.2,
RECLAIM

Cement Kilns ACT Document -- NOx Emissions from Cem ent

Manufacturing (EPA-453/R-94-004, 3/94). Updated September 2000. Rule 1112, 1112.1, 1156,
RECLAIM

Gas Turbines ACT Document -- NOx Emissions from

Stationary Gas Turbines (EPA-453/R-93-007, 1/93) Rule 1134, RECLAIM

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ _______________________________________ Appendix 1 27 June 2006 

## Table 1-3 (Continued)

General ACTs / Other Documents SCAQMD Rule No

Glass Furnaces ACT Document -- NOx Emissions from G lass

Manufacturing (EPA-453/R-94-037, 6/94). Rule 1117, RECLAIM

Internal
Combustion Engines ACT Document -- NOx Emissions from

Stationary IC Engines, EPA-453/R-93-032, 7/93. Updated 9/2000. Rule 1110, 1110.1, 1110.2,
RECLAIM

Iron and Steel NOx emissions from Iron and Steel M ills, EPA

453/R-94-065, 9/94. Rule 404, 405, 407, 409, RECLAIM, 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart N adopted by reference without change to Regulation IX

Municipal Waste
Combustion 40 CFR 60 subpart Cb - Emission Guidelines

and Compliance Schedules for Municipal
Waste Combustors. RECLAIM, 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart Ea, adopted by reference without change to Regulation IX

40 CFR 62 subpart FFF, Federal Plan for

existing large MWC units. RECLAIM, 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart Ea, adopted by reference without change to Regulation IX

OTHER

Bakeries Bakery Oven Emissions, EPA-453/R-92-

017,12/92 Rule 1153

Issues Concerning Bakery RACT

Requirements, 2/8/95 Rule 1153

Dry Cleaning Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from

Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Systems (EPA-450/2-78-050, 12/78, NTIS PB-290-613), (CTG no longer relevant as PERC is exempted
as a VOC - however there is a MACT std for PERC drycleaners) Rule 1102, 1102.1

Ethylene Oxide Ethylene Oxide Sterilization/Fumigat ion

Operations, EPA-450/3-89-007, 3/89, NTIS PB90-131-434 Rule 1103, 40CFR Part 60 Subpart Ec adopted by reference without change to Regulation IX

Fertilizer Control of Fluoride Emissions From Exist ing

Phosphate Fertilizer Plants, EPA-450/2-77- 005, 3/77 40CFR Part 60 Subpart T, U, V, W adopted by reference without change to Regulation IX

Ink & Paint
Manufacture Control of VOC Emissions from Ink and Paint

Manufacturing Processes, EPA-450/3-92-013,
4/92 Rule 1141.1

Leather Tanning Air Emissions and Control Technolog y for

Leather Tanning and Finishing Operations, EPA-453/R-93-025, 6/93 Rule 442

Rule 1145

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ _______________________________________ Appendix 1 28 June 2006 

## Table 1-3 (Continued)

General ACTs / Other Documents SCAQMD Rule No

Nitric & Adipic Acid Nitric and Adipic Acid Manufac turing Plants,

EPA-450/3-91-026, 12/91 40CFR Part 60 Subpart G adopted by reference without change to Regulation IX Pesticides Control of VOC Emissions from the Applic ation

of Agricultural Pesticides, EPA-453/R-92-011, 3/93, NTIS PB-93-199-131 State Regulation

Polyester Resin Control of VOC Emissions from Manuf acture of

Styrene-Butadiene Copolymers - Preliminary

Draft Rule 1162

Polystyrene Foam Manufacturing, EPA 450/3-

90-020 NTIS PB91-102111 Rule 1175

Sulfuric Acid Control of Sulfuric Acid Mist Emissio ns from

Existing Sulfuric Acid Production Units, EPA450/2-77-019, 9/77 40CFR Part 60 Subpart H adopted by reference without change to Regulation IX

Wastewater Control of VOC Emissions from Industrial

Wastewater CTG draft EPA-453/D-93-056 9/92) Rule 1176, 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart QQQ adopted by reference without change to Regulation IX

ACT Document: Air Emissions from Industrial

Wastewater (4/94), ACT consists of cover memo with option tables and CTG draft. Rule 1176, 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart QQQ adopted by reference without change to Regulation IX

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ _______________________________________ Appendix 2 29 June 2006 

# Appendix 2 - RACT Analysis for Group I Rules

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ _______________________________________ Appendix 2 30 June 2006 

# G roup I rules are the rules approved by the U.S. EPA into the SIP for certain category of processes and equipment, and CTG/ACT became availab le for this category after the date of approval.

The following 7 rules are in Group I rules:

 Rule 1106 (CTG/ACT source)

 Rule 1117 (CTG/ACT source)

 Rule 1136 (CTG/ACT source)

 Rule 1153 (CTG/ACT source)

 Rule 1159 (CTG/ACT source)

 Rule 1173 (CTG/ACT source)

 Rule 1176 (CTG/ACT source)

For each of these rules, SCAQMD staff’s analysis in cludes:

1) A summary of the requirements in the rule, specific ally the emissions limits, monitoring, testing and record keeping requirements, and the wo rk practices;

2) A summary of the emission standards, and if availab le, the work practices, monitoring, testing and record keeping recommended in the CTG/A TC;

3) An evaluation for RACT, which is a comparison betwe en the rule requirements with the recommended standards in the CTG/ATC;

4) A conclusion or recommendation.Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Appendix 231June 2006Rule 1106 - Marine Coating Operations (Amended 1/13/95)EMISSION LIMITMONITORING, TESTING AND RECORDKEEPINGRule 1106Applicable to all coating operations ofboats, ships, and their appurtenancesand to buoys and oil drilling rigsintended for marine environment(excluding ships, boats for recreationalpurposes)•Coating-specific emission limits (grams VOC per liter ofcoating, less water and exempt compounds) are specifiedunder each specific category range from 275 – 780 g/L.•In lieu of meeting with coating-specific emission limits, theoperator using non-compliant coatings may comply byusing an air pollution control system with at least85%destruction efficiency.•Solvent cleaning operations must comply with Rule 1171•Daily recordkeeping is required according to Rule 109.Records must include all parameters specified underRule 109(c)(1). Rule 109 allows the use ofmanufacturer product specifications or testing usingappropriate SCAQMD, ARB, USEPA test methods.•The approved test methods are specified such as EPAReference Method 24, 25, 25A; and SCAQMD Method304, 311, 25.1; and other applicable ASTM methods.EPA CTG for Shipbuilding andShip Repair Operations (SurfaceCoating), 61 FR 44050, 8/27/96•The coating-specific emission limits (grams VOC perliterof coating, less water and exempt compounds) specifiedunder Table 1 of this CTG range from 340 – 780 g/L.•The CTG also includes equivalent solid-based emissionlimits for situations where thinning solvent is added to acoating.•The CTG does not include an option for the use of add-oncontrols since the type and size of tanks inside aship thatmay be painted at a ship-yard vary and make the case-by-case cost effectiveness difficult to evaluate.EVALUATION FOR RACTThe emission limits in EPA’s CTG are as stringent or less stringent than the emission limits set in Rule 1106.CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIONRule 1106 meets federal RACT requirements.Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Appendix 232June 2006Rule 1117 - Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Glass Melting Furnaces (Amended 1/6/84)EMISSION LIMITMONITORING, TESTING ANDRECORDKEEPINGRule 1117Applicable to all glass melting furnaces4.0 lb/NOx per ton of glass pulledNoneEPA ACT Document – NOx EmissionsFrom Glass Manufacturing, EPA-453/R-93-007, 6/94•Uncontrolled emission levels are reported to have arange from 2.7lbs to 27.1 lbs NOx per ton glass pulled.•Control efficiencies are reported to have a range from 10% - 85%.EVALUATION FOR RACT1) ACT Document – NOx Emissions From Glass Manufacturing, EPA-453/R-93-007, 6/94Using the information in this ACT, the most stringent controlled emission level is estimated to be about: (27.1) (1-0.85) = 4 lbs NOx per ton of glass pulled,which is equivalent to the level regulated in Rule1117.2) SCAQMD RECLAIM Regulation XXIn addition, all glass melting furnaces subject tothis rule are currently operating in the SCAQMD emission cap-and-trade program (RECLAIM) program, andRECLAIM is considered by EPA as meeting RACT(71 FR28290).Regarding monitoring, testing and/or recordkeepingrequirements, all major NOx sources in RECLAIM arerequired to have a continuous in stack NOx and O2monitoring system that meets the requirements for certification and Quality Assurance/Quality Controlspecified in Chapter 2, Appendix A of Rule 2012 whichare similar to 40 CFR 60 Appendix B & F requirements, and all large NOx sources are required to have atotalizing fuel meter and conduct a performance testonce every three years.CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIONRule 1117 meets federal RACT requirements.Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Appendix 233June 2006Rule 1136 – Wood Products Coating (Amended 6/14/96)EMISSION LIMITMONITORING, TESTINGAND RECORDKEEPINGRule 1136Applicable to all applicationsof coatings or strippers to,and surface preparation of,any wood products, includingfurniture, cabinets, shutters,frames and toys (excludingresidential noncommercialoperations)•Emission limits range from 0.21 - 0.36 lbs VOC perlbs of solids.•The rule contains three formats for VOC limits, i.e. grams/liter, lbs/gallon coating less waterand exempt compounds, and lbs/lbs solids coating)•Averaging provisions are allowed provided that emissions from the coatings being averagedare less than or equal to 90% of the emissions fromcompliant coatings.•Add-on control is allowed provided that equivalentor greater amount of emission reductionsare achieved compared to using compliant coatings.•Transfer efficiency is at least 65%, or operator must use certain type of equipment (e.g.HVLP)•Solvent cleaning operations must comply with Rule 1171•Daily recordkeeping isrequired according toRule 109.•The approved testmethods are specifiedsuch as EPA ReferenceMethod 24, 25, 25A; andother applicable ASTMmethods.•EPA CTG Documents -Control of VOCEmissions from WoodFurnitureManufacturingOperations, EPA-453/R-96-007, 4/96•61 FR 25223, 5/20/96•61 FR 50823, 9/27/96•The emission limits specified are:0.8 lbs VOC per lb of solids for waterborne topcoats; or2.0 - 2.3 lbs VOC per lb of solids for higher-solids sealers and topcoats.•The CTG does not contain emission limits in grams/liter or lbs/gal.•The CTG does not contain averaging provision•The CTG does not specify minimum transfer efficiency and recommend coating application,however, it deters the use of conventional air spray application.•The CTG does not discuss the application of add-oncontrol device•Other work practices recommended are: 1) close containers when not in use; 2) conductvisible inspection for leaks; 3) develop and implement inspection & maintenance (I&M) plan;4) ban the use of conventional air guns, but the CTG does not specify minimum transferefficiency; 5) recommend the use of strippable spray booth materials over the use of solventsfor spray booth cleaning.Not discussed.EVALUATION FOR RACTThe emission limits recommended in the CTGs are less stringent than those in Rule 1136. In addition,the work practices in the CTG are covered under Rule 1171.CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIONRule 1136 meets federal RACT requirements.Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Appendix 234June 2006Rule 1153 - Commercial Bakery Ovens (Amended 1/13/95)EMISSION LIMITMONITORING, TESTINGAND RECORDKEEPINGRule 1153Applicable to existing and new bakeryovens which emit more than 50 lbs/day onan uncontrolled basisFor existing bakery ovens:•Emission reduction of 70% or more is required forovens emit between 50 lbs -100 lbs VOC/day, or•Emission reduction of 95% or more for ovens emitting more than 100 lbs/dayFor new bakery ovens:•Emission reduction of 95% or more is requiredTest methods: EPA TM 25 orSCAQMD TM 25.1•EPA ACT Document – Bakery OvenEmissions, EPA-453/R-92-017,12/92•EPA Document - Issues ConcerningBakery RACT Requirements, 2/8/96•80% - 95% emission reductions•EPA allows the states to determine appropriate exemption levels for smallemitting ovens.EVALUATION FOR RACTRule 1153 requires 95% emission reduction for “major” sources emitting more 50 lbs/day, or 9 tons peryear assuming 365 operation days in a year, which is the moststringent level of control recommended in the ACT.For smaller categories of ovens (non major sources), Rule 1153 requires 70% emission reductions, which is lessthan the level of 80% recommended in the ACT. There is no CTG for this source category, therefore there is no mandated level of control. The level of 80% -95%control recommended in the ACT however is not mandated, and since EPA allows the states to determine appropriate level of control for non-major source, staff hasselected the cut-off point for control at 70% and considered that this is RACT for non-major bakery ovens.CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIONRule 1153 meets federal RACT requirements. SCAQMDmay, if needed, reevaluate the control level (i.e.95% instead of 70%) for smaller ovens and theappropriateness of the exemption level (i.e. for ovens emitting less than 9 tons VOC per year)Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Appendix 235June 2006Rule 1159 – Nitric Acid Units – Oxides of Nitrogen(Adopted 12/6/85)EMISSION LIMITMONITORING, TESTING ANDRECORDKEEPINGRule 1159Applicable to all nitric acid production unit•450 ppmv, averaged over 15 consecutive minutes, or•237 ppmv, averaged over 60 consecutive minutes; or•3 lbs/ton acid produced, averaged over 60 consecutive minutes.NoneEPA ACT Document – Nitric and Adipic AcidManufacturing Plants, EPA-450/3-91-026, 12/91•Does not contain emission standards•Average control efficiencies were reported to be from 86% - 95%.EVALUATION FOR RACTSCAQMD RECLAIM Regulation XXThe ACT does not include mandated emission standards. All nitric acid manufacturing plants subject to this rule are currently operating in the SCAQMD emissioncap-and-trade program (RECLAIM) program, which EPAproposed to approve into SIP as it meet RACT on May16, 2006 (71 FR 28290).Regarding monitoring, testing and/or recordkeepingrequirements, all major NOx sources in RECLAIM arerequired to have a continuous in stack NOx and O2monitoring system that meets the requirements for certification and Quality Assurance/Quality Controlspecified in Chapter 2, Appendix A of Rule 2012 which aresimilar to 40 CFR 60 Appendix B & F requirements, and all large NOx sources are required to have a totalizing fuel meter and conduct a performance test once everythree years.CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIONRule 1159 meets federal RACT requirements.Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Appendix 236June 2006Rule 1173 - Fugitive Emissions of Volatile OrganicCompounds (Amended 12/6/02)EMISSION LIMITMONITORING, TESTING AND RECORDKEEPINGRule 1173Applicable to valves,fittings, pumps,compressors, pressure reliefdevices (PRD), diaphragms,hatches, sight-glasses,and meters at refineries,chemical plants, oil and gasproduction fields, naturalgas processing plants, andpipeline transfer stations.•Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) program to reducefugitive emissions•Threshold for leaks are:for light liquid/gas/vapor service >10,000 ppmv,for PRDs >200 ppmv, andfor pumps in heavy liquid >100 ppmv•For atmospheric PRDs, either:use vapor recovery or add-on control if the refineryexperiences where i) a second release of more than500lbs VOC within any five year period, or ii) any releaseof 2,000 lbs VOC in any 24 hour period; orpay mitigation fee.•Inspection frequency for leaks:Accessible pumps, compressors, and PRDs: audio-visually once every 8-hr period.PRD: annually and re-inspect within 14 days afterareliefOther accessible components: quarterlyAll inaccessible components: annually•Repair leaking components promptly between 1 days to 14days depending to the component type and the severity of theleaks•Monitor PRD with tamper proof electronic equipmentand/ortelltale indicators•Conduct a failure analysis for every PRD release ofmore than500 lbs VOC in 24-hour period•Inspection method is EPA Reference Method 21(measurements are taken at the sources or at zerodistance)EPA ACT Document –Petroleum Refinery Tier 2BACT Analysis Report,1/16/01•Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) program to reducefugitive emissions in various NESHAP and NSPS. Therequirements in NESHAP, 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart H(HON) are the most stringent.•In HON, threshold for leaks are:for pumps in light liquid service >10,000 ppmv inPhase I and >5000 ppmv in Phase II and Phase IIIfor valves in light liquid/gas/vapor service >10,000ppmv in Phase I and >500 ppmv in Phase II and PhaseIIIfor compressors >500 ppmvfor PRDs >500 ppmv,for pumps and other components in heavy liquidservice, from >500 ppmv to >5,000 ppmv dependingon type of components•Inspection frequencies for leaks vary from daily toannuallydepending on the type of components, severity of leaks, andnumber of leaking components detected.•Repair leaking components promptly between 1 days to 15days depending to the component type and the severity of theleaks, The first attempt at repair is usually required to beaccomplished no later than 5 days after a leak is detected•Inspection method is EPA Reference Method 21Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Appendix 237June 2006Rule 1173 (Continued)EVALUATION FOR RACT1) ACT Document – Petroleum Refinery Tier 2 BACTAnalysis Report, 1/16/01BackgroundThe most recent CTG was developed to address specifically Tier 2 program at refineries. Tier 2 standards are aimed to reduce exhaust gas emissions fromcars andlight trucks, including minivans, sport utility vehicles, and pickup trucks. As part of the Tier 2 program, refineries must produce gasoline with lower sulfur contentto meet an average of 30 ppmv beginning in 2005. In order to produce gasoline with lower sulfur content, refineries may need to add equipment or makemodifications to their existing equipment, which may result in permit applications that trigger the New Source Review (NSR) regulations. This ACT documentprovides technical information needed in evaluatingBACT and LAER for certain refinery units includingboilers, heaters, hydro treating units, sulfur recovery units,sour water strippers, and hydrogen plants, particularly in the control of NOx and fugitive emissions.Information on fugitive emissions as presented inSection 4 &Table B-2 of this report containing discussion on the LDAR requirements in NSPS and NESHAP, specifically in NESHAP 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart H (HON); 40CFR Part 63, Subpart CC and 40 CFR Part 60 SubpartGGG for refineries. A summary is tabulated in theTable above in parallel with Rule 1173 for easycomparison.Evaluation for RACTLeak thresholds in NESHAP rules (HON) for components in light liquid/gas/vapor services (5,000 ppmv) are lower compared to those (10,000 ppmv) in Rule1173; however for PRDs, the leak threshold in NESHAP (500 ppmv) is higher than in Rule 1173 (200 ppmv).The frequencies of inspection are about the same for NESHAP and Rule 1173.Rule 1173 includes many additional requirements (e.g. tamper proof electronic valve monitoring devicesand process control instrumentation and telltaleindicators) for preventive maintenance and aiming at reducing the emissions released from PRDs.Because there are many areas of differences in NESHAP rules (HON) and Rule 1173, it is difficult to compare and assess which rule is more stringent. Thesuccess of any LDAR program does not depend solelyon the stringency of the program but remains with the implementation of that program. Rule 1173 is atleast as stringent as NESHAP, and is voted the moststringent measure by CAPCOA in 2003 for controlling fugitive leaks.2) Potential All Feasible Measures, CAPCOA, 9/2003By comparing Rule 1173 to other District rules in California, such as Bay Area, San Diego, Sacramento,San Joaquin, this report rates Rule 1173 as the moststringent potential all feasible measures for fugitive emissions.CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIONRule 1173 meets federal RACT requirements.Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Appendix 238June 2006Rule 1176 - Sumps and Wastewater Separators (Amended 9/13/96)EQUIPMENTCATEGORYEMISSION LIMITMONITORING, TESTING AND RECORDKEEPINGRule 1176Applicable to wastewatersystems and associatedcontrol equipment locatedat petroleum refineries,on-shore oil productionfields, off-shore oilproduction platforms,chemical plants, andindustrial facilities•Wastewater systems:≤500 ppmv•Sumps/Wastewater Separators must have 1) floating cover withseals; or 2) fixed cover vented to control device•Sewer lines: totally enclosed•Process drains: with SCAQMD approved water seals•Junction boxes: totally enclosed•Control device must have 1)≥95% control efficiency or2)≤500 ppmv leak above background•Inspect for leaks by SCAQMD certified inspector•Frequency of inspection at refineries: 1) Accessible: monthly;2) Inaccessible: annually, 3) Control device at least monthly•Frequency of inspection at other facilities: 1) Accessible:quarterly, 2) 2. Inaccessible: Annually•Methods used in inspections: 1) EPA Method 21; or 2)SCAQMD Grab Sample method in Rule 1176•For control device, conduct annual performance testwith EPAReference Method 25, or SCAQMD Method 25.1.EPA ACT Document –Petroleum Refinery Tier2 BACT Analysis Report,1/16/01•Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) program to reducefugitiveemissions in various NESHAP and NSPS. The requirements inNESHAP, 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart H (HON) are the moststringent.•In HON, threshold for leaks are:for pumps in light liquid service >10,000 ppmv in Phase Iand >5000 ppmv in Phase II and Phase IIIfor valves in light liquid/gas/vapor service >10,000 ppmv inPhase I and >500 ppmv in Phase II and Phase IIIfor compressors >500 ppmvfor PRDs >500 ppmv,for pumps and other components in heavy liquid service,from >500 ppmv to >5,000 ppmv depending on type ofcomponents•Inspection frequencies for leaks vary from daily toannuallydepending on the type of components, severity of leaks, andnumber of leaking components detected.•Repair leaking components promptly between 1 days to 15days depending to the component type and the severity of theleaks, The first attempt at repair is usually required to beaccomplished no later than 5 days after a leak is detected•Inspection method is EPA Reference Method 21EVALUATION FOR RACTThe recent published ACT is applicable to sour water treatment units at refineries. Rule 1176 is more stringent since it contains more specific requirements (e.g.enclosed junction boxes, approved seals for processdrains) and contains the same 500 ppmv leak threshold.CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIONRule 1176 meets federal RACT requirements.

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ ____________________________________ Appendix 3 39 June 2006 

# Appendix 3 - RACT Analysis for Group II Rules

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ ____________________________________ Appendix 3 40 June 2006 

# G roup II rules are the rules that are approved by th e U.S. EPA into SIP. Since these rules are approved by CARB and U.S. EPA, they met federal RACT requirements. However, because of various reasons, amendments to the rule were made after the approval dates. A

reevaluation for RACT is needed to assure that the amendments do not result in a relaxation of control. If necessary, SCAQMD staff included an analysis to justify that any relaxation, if made, would not interfere with the attainment date.

The following 12 rules are in Group II:

 Rule 461 (CTG/ACT source)

 Rule 463 (CTG/ACT source)

 Rule 1107 (CTG/ACT source)

 Rule 1113 (CTG/ACT source)

 Rule 1121 (not a CTG/ACT source)

 Rule 1145 (CTG/ACT source)

 Rule 1146.2 (CTG/ACT source)

 Rule 1151 (CTG/ACT source)

 Rule 1162 (CTG/ACT source)

 Rule 1166 (not a CTG/ACT source)

 Rule 1168 (not a CTG/ACT source)

 Rule 1171(ACT source)

For each of these rules, SCAQMD staff’s analysis in cludes:

1) A summary of the amendments, 2) A background, if necessary, to provide explanation and basis for the amendments,

and 3) An evaluation of impact of the amendments on previo us RACT determination

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ ____________________________________ Appendix 3 41 June 2006 

# Rule 461 – Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing (Amende d 6/3/05)

• Summary of Amendments Rule 461, amended in June 2005, implements Californ ia Health and Safety Code (H&S Code) Section 40724 to require best available retro fit control technology for agricultural sources by phasing out the exemptions for agricultu ral operations. Additional amendments are to enhance recordkeeping and reporti ng, to require personnel training and improve clarity and enforceability of the rule. An exemption from the Phase II requirements is proposed for fueling Tournament of Roses Parade floats.

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination The amendments are administrative in nature; theref ore they have no impact on previous

RACT determination.



# Rule 463 – Organic Liquid Storage (Amended 5/6/05)

• Summary of Amendments Rule 463, amended in May 2005, will remove the hydr ogen sulfide content standard for

crude oil and the associated test method which has been shown to be non-reproducible.

Reliable alternative test methods do not exist and the hydrogen sulfide in crude oil has been shown not to off-gas. Other proposed changes are administrative in nature, including clarifying language, changes to the defin itions, addition of test methods for true vapor pressure, reinstatement of language link ing the rule and the addendum, and addition of rule consistency language to the Test M ethods section.

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination

The amendment is administrative in nature. Since t he standard of hydrogen sulfide cannot be measured, it was removed. Hydrogen sulfi de is also not precursor of ozone.



# Rule 1107 – Coating of Metal Parts and Products (Am ended 1/6/06)

• Summary of Amendments The amendments add an exemption for the use of up t o ten gallons per year per facility of liquid photo resist applied to metal substrates wit h a thickness of not more than 0.060

inches.

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination The coating necessary for this activity has high VO C content (~ 6.7 lbs/gal). No lowVOC substitute has been identified. However, only a small amount of coating is applied. The annual usage at a facility is no more than ten gallons. There are currently six affected facilities in the basin, and the average total dail y VOC emission for all six facilities is estimated to be less than 2 lbs/day. With such a lo w usage on the market, it is unlikely

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ ____________________________________ Appendix 3 42 June 2006 

## that low-VOC formulation will be developed and ther efore, the current technology represents RACT for this process.



# Rule 1113 – Architectural Coatings (Amended 7/9/04)

• Summary of Amendments The proposed amendment addresses SIP approvability issues identified by the U.S. EPA relative to the alternative compliance option of th e rule, the Averaging Compliance Option.

• Background Rule 1113 was originally adopted in September 1977, and has undergone numerous amendments. Rule 1113, amended on November 1996 an d approved by EPA, included an Averaging Compliance Option (ACO) for flat coati ng category. Under this ACO, manufacturers are allowed to average their emission s over a compliance period not to exceed one year provided that they demonstrate thei r actual emissions from the averaged coatings are less than or equal to the emissions th at would have been allowed under Rule 1113. Further amendments to Rule 1113 on May 1999, July 2001, December 2002 and December 2003, reduced significantly the allocated VOC limits for many coating categories and added numerous other coating categor ies to the averaging program to provide manufacturers additional compliance flexibi lity. EPA has expressed concerns regarding the enforceability and administration of the average program, and the latest

amendment is a SIP fix to address EPA concerns.

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination The amendments significantly reduced VOC limits and contain procedural improvements, and therefore have no impact on previ ous RACT determination. Rule 1113 is considered the most stringent rule in Calif ornia by CAPCOA in 2003, and represents the above and beyond RACT level.



# Rule 1121 – Control of Nitrogen Oxides from Residen tial Type, Natural Gas-Fired Water Heaters (Amended 9/3/04)

• Summary of Amendments Final compliance dates were postponed one to three years depending upon the size and type of the water heater in order to provide time f or manufacturers to resolve the safety (flammable) issue associated with water heaters. M odification to the mitigation fee

determination was also included.

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination

This rule addresses residential applications only a nd there is no relaxation on the emission standards, just a delay in the compliance date. There is no CTG/ACT for

residential water heaters.

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ ____________________________________ Appendix 3 43 June 2006 

# Rule 1145 – Plastic, Rubber, Leather and Glass Coat ings (Amended 12/3/04)

• Summary of Amendments The amendments set more stringent VOC limits and fu ture compliance dates for several coating categories. The proposed amendments also e stablish new VOC limits for leather and extreme performance coatings, set the High Volu me Low Pressure gun efficiency as the baseline for determining equivalent transfer ef ficiency, and add a limited exemption for polyurethane shoe sole coating. This proposed amendment partially implements 2003 AQMP Control Measure CTS-10 and achieves an em ission reduction of approximately 1.2 tons per day at an average cost-e ffectiveness of $4,026 per ton of

VOC reduced.

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination

There is no relaxation on the emission standards.



# Rule 1146.2 – Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Large Water Heaters and Small Boilers (Amended 1/7/05)

• Summary of Amendments Rule 1146.2 was adopted in January 1998 to establis h NOx emission limits for boilers and water heaters from 75,000 to 2 million Btu/hr. Because retrofit low NOx burners are only available for a limited number of boilers and water heaters, the compliance dates were extended to the end of a 15-year life for this category of boiler/heater.

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination Rule 1146.2 is included in the Settlement Agreement for the 1999 AQMP amendment. The emission reductions foregone are expected to oc cur eventually in 2014, and in addition, the 2003 AQMP includes a three tons set a side to account for the delay in technology implementation, and a portion of that wi ll be used to offset the reductions forgone in this rule. The amendments of R1146.2 wi ll not impact the attainment date. In addition, Rule 1146.2 was amended again in May 2006 to strengthen the limits. These sources are under RECLAIM, which is considered BARC T, above and beyond RACT (71 FR 28290).



# Rule 1151 – Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Non- Assembly Line Coating Operations (Amended 12/2/05)

• Summary of Amendments

The amendments further reduce VOC limits in accorda nce with the California Air Resources Board 2005 Automotive Coatings Suggested Control Measure. The

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ ____________________________________ Appendix 3 44 June 2006 

## amendments implement in part Control Measure CTS-10 - Miscellaneous Industrial Coatings and Solvent Operations which is part of th e 2003 AQMP.

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination CTG was developed in 1977, and the amendments have no impact on previous RACT determination, therefore staff considered that it m eets RACT.



# Rule 1162 – Polyester Resin Operations (Amended 7/8 /05)

• Summary of Amendments Rule 1162, amended in July 2005, removed the requir ement of applying gel coats solely with nonatomizing spray application techniques, est ablished a list of acceptable low emitting spray application techniques for gel coat, clarified the use of hand-held spray equipment for gel coat touch-up and repair, and add ed an exemption for application under 1 gallon per day.

• Background Past amendments to Rule 1162 sought to reduce VOC e missions by limiting the allowable VOC content of resins and gel coats, and requiring the use of nonatomizing spray application. A test program conducted by the industry and the district shows that nonatomizing spray application is not technically e ffective, and results in an inferior product. Therefore, in July 2005, the requirement restricting the application of gel coats to nonatomizing spray application is removed, and a list of acceptable low emitting spray application techniques for gel coat, including air- assisted airless spray, HVLP, and

electrostatic attraction is added.

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination The past amendments of Rule 1162 were to implement Control Measures CTS-08 of the 1997 AQMP and the 1999 amended AQMP. By removing t he requirement related to the use of nonatomizing spray application techniques, t he July 2005 amendments result in foregone VOC emission reductions of 0.45 tons per d ay. However, other rulemaking actions up to July 2005 (i.e., Rule 1122 and Rule 1 162 in 2001) have resulted in a total reduction exceeding the SIP commitment of 3 tpd in the 1997/1999 SIP for CTS-08, which would easily offset the 0.4 tpd from Rule 116 2. The CTG for this category was published in 1983, and there is no recently develop ed CTG, therefore staff considered

that the standards in Rule 1162 meet RACT. This ru le is considered the most stringent control in California by CAPCOA in 2003.

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ ____________________________________ Appendix 3 45 June 2006 

# Rule 1166 – Volatile Organic Compound Emissions fro m Decontamination of Soil (Amended 5/11/01)

• Summary of Amendments The proposed amendments will improve enforceability of Rule 1166 by requiring 1) that contaminated soil stockpiles be sprayed with a vapo r suppressant and covered with plastic sheeting; 2) a daily inspection of the cove red stockpile; and 3) that records are kept of chain of custody between generator, transpo rter, storage and treatment facilities.

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination The amendments have no impact on previous RACT dete rmination. There is no CTG/ACT for this source category. This rule is con sidered as most stringent by CAPCOA in 2003, therefore staff considered this rul e is RACT.



# Rule 1168 – Adhesive and Sealant Applications (Amen ded 1/7/05)

• Summary of Amendments

The amendments maintain the current VOC limits for PVC and CPVC welding, reduce the VOC limit for primers used in conjunction with PVC and CPVC welding, reduce the VOC limit for ABS cements, postpone the final limit for top and trim adhesives until January 1, 2007, and allow limited use of methylene chloride in adhesive formulations. The amendments are to resolve 1) performance and ap plication concerns with water and acetone-based adhesives, 2) difficulties in substit uting exempt compounds for VOC solvents, 3) obtaining other regulatory agency and product approval requirements.

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination The rule is to implement SCAQMD Control Measure CTS -02E in the 1997 AQMP, as amended in 1999, which calls for greater use of low -VOC, high-solids, or multicomponent adhesives to achieve 1.3 tpd reductions o verall. The amendment of Rule 1168 in 2000 achieved reductions of 8.0 tpd for 201 0. Several amendments in 2002, 2003, and 2005 cause a 1.8 tpd emission reduction f oregone. The remaining 6.2 tpd reductions however are well in excess of the requir ed 1.3 tpd reductions required from CM CTS-02E in the 1997 AQMP, as amended in 1999. T here is no CTG/ACT for this source category, and this rule was considered conta ining the most stringent limits by CAPCOA in 2003, therefore staff considered that it represents RACT.

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

___________________________________________________ ____________________________________ Appendix 3 46 June 2006 

# Rule 1171 – Solvent Cleaning Operations (Amended 5/ 6/05)

• Summary of Amendments The amendments implement the recommendations from atechnology assessment of lowVOC cleaning materials. Compliance date was delaye d one year for the cleaning of ink application equipment used for lithographic/letterp ress printing, screen printing and

ultraviolet/electron beam inks. Additional time is necessary to fully assess the impact of promising new formulations on print quality, equipm ent life and costs. SCAQMD staff proposes to extend and add limited exemptions for c ertain specialized cleaning categories.

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination Rule 1171 implemented a control measure from the 19 97 AQMP (CM#97ADV-CLNG) to meet state and federal requirements. The propos ed changes to Rule 1171 delays part of the 2005 VOC emission reductions expected from t he 1999 rule amendment; however, it would not affect the overall attainment strategy . There is no CTG for this source category, and this rule was considered containing t he most stringent limits by CAPCOA in 2003, therefore staff considered this rule repre sents RACT.

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 4 47 June 2006 

# Appendix 4 - RACT Analysis for Group III Rules

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 4 48 June 2006 

## Group III rules are the NOx or VOC rules that have not yet been approved by the U.S. EPA into SIP. SCAQMD staff reviewed these rules to ensure that the rules meet federal RACT requirements.

The following 6 rules are in Group III. Staff adde d footnotes to make clarifications as recommended by EPA Region IX.

 Rule 462 (CTG/ACT source) 34



##  Rule 1109 (CTG/ACT source) 35



##  Rule 1110.2 (CTG/ACT source) 36



##  Rule 1118 (not a CTG/ACT source) 37



##  Rule 1133.2 (not a CTG/ACT source) 38



##  Rule 1163 (not a CTG/ACT source)

For each of these rules, SCAQMD staff’s analysis in cludes:

1) A summary of the requirements in the rule, specific ally the emissions limits, monitoring, testing and record keeping requirements , and the work practices;

2) A summary of the emission standards, and if availab le, the work practices, monitoring, testing and record keeping recommended in the CTG/ATC;

3) An evaluation for RACT, which is a comparison betwe en the rule requirements with the recommended standards in the CTG/ATC;

4) SCAQMD staff’s conclusion or recommendation.

34 

### Rule 462 was SIP-approved on 7/21/99 (64 FR 9037). EPA web site will be updated accordingly.

35 

### Rule 1109 was withdrawn from SIP processing action on 5/23/00 (65 FR 33259) since all affected sources subject to this rule are now under RECLAIM.

36 

### Staff has not yet submitted the latest amendments of Rule 1110.2, dated June 3, 2005, to EPA for SIP approval because staff will amend the rule again in late 2006 to improve the sections related to sourc e testing and monitoring.

37 

### Staff will follow up on the submittal of this rule to EPA for review and SIP approval.

38 

### Rule 1133.2 was SIP-approved on 7/21/04 (69 FR 435 18). EPA web site will be updated accordingly.

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 4 49 June 2006Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP DemonstrationAppendix 450June 2006Rule 462 – Organic Liquid Loading (Amended 5/14/99)EQUIPMENTCATEGORYEMISSION LIMITMONITORING, TESTINGAND RECORDKEEPINGRule 462Applicable to:Class A facilitieshaving loading ratesof 20,000 gals/day ormore of organicliquid with vaporpressure of 1.5 psiaor greaterClass B facilitieshaving loading ratesfrom 4,000 gals/dayto 20,000 gals/day ofgasolineClass C facilitieshaving loading ratesof less than 4,000gals/day and not morethan 500,000 gals/yrof gasolineClass A Facilities•CARB certified vapor recovery system or SCAQMD approved vapor recovery system if not requireCARB certification pursuant to H&S Code 41954•Comply with a standard of 0.08 lbs VOC per 1000 galtransferred or less•Bottom loading•No overfills or leaks•Vapor recovery system’s backpressure must be lessthan 18 in waterClass B Facilities•CARB certified vapor recovery system or SCAQMD approved vapor recovery system if not requireCARB certification pursuant to H&S Code 41954•90% efficiency for vapor recovery•Bottom loading•No overfills or leaks•Vapor recovery system’s backpressure must be lessthan 18 in waterClass C Facilities•Bottom loading or submerged loading•No overfills or leaks•Continuous monitoringsystem meeting 40 CFRPart 60, Appendix B forClass A facilities only.•Leak inspection for allClass A, B and C facilities:1) Monthly basis if sight,sound and smell are usedas detection methods; or2) Quarterly basis if anOrganic Vapor Analyzer(OVA) is used•Recordkeeping of dailythroughput and verificationof complianceStaff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP DemonstrationAppendix 451June 2006Rule 462 (Continued)EQUIPMENTCATEGORYEMISSION LIMITMONITORING, TESTINGAND RECORDKEEPINGYolo-Solano AQMDRule 2.21, Amended9/14/05Applicable to anygasoline bulk plant,any terminal, or anytransport vessel thatstores and transfersorganic liquid with aTVP of 0.5 psia orgreater.Terminal Loading (Section 308)•CARB certified vapor recovery system or AQMD approved vapor recovery system if not requireCARB certification pursuant to H&S Code 41954•Comply with a standard of 0.08 lbs VOC per 1000 galtransferred or less•Bottom loading•No overfills or leaksGasoline Bulk Loading (Section 309)•CARB certified vapor recovery system or AQMD approved vapor recovery system if not requireCARB certification pursuant to H&S Code 41954•95% efficiency for vapor recovery•Bottom loading•No overfills or leaks•Vapor recovery efficiencytest every 12 months•No requirements for leakinspection•Records of quarterlythroughputEPA CTG ---Control of VolatileOrganic EmissionsFrom Bulk GasolinePlants, EPA-450/2-77-035, 12/77•Submerged loading (either top loading or bottom loading), or•Submerged loading and vapor balance with 90% control efficiencyEPA --- BeyondVOC RACT CTGRequirements, EPA453/R-95-010, 4/95South Coast rule is considered as providing quantifiable “additional” reduction relative to federal CTGas shown in Table 1-1, Section 4.3, and Section 4.4of the report.Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP DemonstrationAppendix 452June 2006Rule 462 (Continued)EVALUATION FOR RACTHistory of Rule 462Rule 462 was amended several times. Prior to the last 1999 amendments, Rule 462 was amended on 6/9/95to implement Control Measure #94FUG-01 of the1994 AQMP, which was adopted to comply with the California and Federal CAA. The 1995 amendments reduced the VOC emission limit from 0.29 to 0.08pound per 1,000 gallons of organic liquid transferred in Class A facilities as required under 40 CFR,Part 63, Subpart R --- National Emission StandardsforGasoline Distribution Facilities. This amendment also included rule language clarification to enhancethe rule’s enforceabilityThe 1995 version of the rule was submitted to CARBand EPA for review and inclusion into SIP. EPA provided a limited approval/disapproval of Rule 462,which was effective on 12/15/97, and required the District to correct the definition of “Facility Vapor Leak” that allowed measurement of vapor leak at adistance of two centimeters from the source, sincethis two-centimeter distance is inconsistent with EPA Test Method 21, which requires measurement of vaporleak at the surface of the source or within one centimeter from the surface of moving parts (62 FR 26460). Because of this reason, the District again revisedRule 462 in 1999 to address EPA’s disapproval issue. The 1999 amendments also included several administrative changes identified by District staff or bythefacilities. As a result, EPA has not imposed any emission offset sanctions, or any Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) due to the limited disapproval of Rule 461in 1995.CAPCOA 2003 Potential All Feasible Measures & Yolo-Solano AQMD Rule 2.21In September 2003, the CAPCOA rules subcommittee has determined that Yolo-Solano AQMD Rule 2.21, amended on 6/12/02, was the “most stringent”Potential All Feasible Control Measures for organicliquid storage and transfer. Yolo-Solano Rule 2.21 was recently revised in 9/14/05. A one-to-onecomparison between the Yolo-Solano Rule 2.21 and South Coast Rule 461 is provided above. Yolo-SolanoRule 2.21 also includes requirements for storagetanks of capacity of more than 250 gals which is not stated in the table above since these requirements should be compared to South Coast Rule 463 and 1178.With respect to Class A facilities, the requirements in South Coast Rule 461 are as stringent as the requirements in Yolo-Solano Rule 2.21. However, forotherfacilities with loading rates less than 20,000 gal/day, Yolo-Solano Rule 2.21 requires 95% control efficiency for vapor recovery system whereas South Coastonly requires 90% control efficiency for Class B facilities and does not specify any requirements forvapor recovery in Class C facilities.However, Yolo-Solano Rule 2.21 does not include stringent requirements for storage tanks as South Coast Rule 1178. In South Coast Rule 1178, doming isrequired for all external floating roof tanks withTVP of 3psia or more at “major” facilities with annual emissions of greater than 20 tons per year VOC.SouthCoast Rule 1178 is voted as the most stringent control measure for storage tanks by CAPCOA in 2003.Federal RACT RequirementsRule 462, amended in 1999, has more stringent requirements than those stated in federal CTG as shown in the two EPAdocuments listed above.CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIONRule 462, amended in 1999, meets federal RACT requirements and is considered above and beyond RACT byEPA. Even though it may not be as stringent asYolo-Solano Rule 2.21 with respect to the efficiency requirement for vapor recovery system for Class Cfacilities, when considered together with therequirements for storage tanks in South Coast Rule1178, they together met the air quality goals of the AQMPStaff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP DemonstrationAppendix 453June 2006Rule 1109 – Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Boilers and Process Heaters in Petroleum Refineries(Amended 8/5/88)EVALUATION FOR RACTRule 1109 was withdrawn from SIP processing actionon 5/23/2000 (65 FR 33259) after CARB informed EPAthat all boilers and heaters subject to Rule1109 located at refineries are subject to RECLAIM rules. EPA is proposing to approve Regulation XX into SIP (Citation 71 FR 28290)CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIONRule 1109, or RECLAIM, meets federal RACT requirements.Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP DemonstrationAppendix 454June 2006Rule 1110.2 – Emissions from Gaseous and Liquid-Fueled Engines (Amended 6/3/05)EQUIPMENT CATEGORYEMISSION LIMITMONITORING,TESTING, ANDRECORDKEEPINGRule 1110.2Applicable to:1)All stationary and portable engines over 50 bop2)For engines that are used for electric powergeneration; or fired landfill gas, sewage digestergas, oil field-produced gas, or LPG; or used to drivea water supply or conveyance pump except foraeration facilities; or used for integral enginecompressor application operating less than 4000hours per year3) For portable engines1) For all stationary and portable Ices:•NOx = 36 ppmv, corrected to 15% oxygen on a dry basis , andaveraged over 15 minutes•VOC = 250 ppmv, measured as carbon, corrected to 15% oxygen on adry basis , and averaged over 15 minutes•CO = 2000 ppmv, corrected to 15% oxygen on a dry basis , andaveraged over 15 minutes2) For this group of engines:Concentration Limit = Reference Limit x Efficiency/25%, where ReferenceLimits are:•For engines 500 bop or greater : NOx = 36 ppmv, VOC= 250 ppmv;•For engines from 50 bop – 500 bop: NOx = 45 ppmv, VOC = 250 ppmv3) For portable spark-ignition engines:•NOx = 80 ppmv (1.5 g/bhp-hr)•VOC = 240 ppmv (1.5 g/bhp-hr)•CO = 176 ppmvFor portable compression-ignition engines:•Depending on the engine size, the limit for NOx ranging from 535ppmv (7 g/bhp-hr) to 770 ppmv (10 g/bhp-hr); or turbocharged and 4degree injection retard, or turbocharged with aftercooler/intercoolerand 4 degree injection timing retard.•CEMS for enginesof 1000 bhp andgreater•Source testing atleast once everythree years•Recordkeeping ofhours ofoperation, type offuel used, and fuelconsumptionStaff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP DemonstrationAppendix 455June 2006Rule 1110.2 Continued)EQUIPMENT CATEGORYEMISSION LIMITMONITORING,TESTING, ANDRECORDKEEPINGEPA ACT Document – NOxEmissions from Stationary InterCombustion Engines, EPA453/R-93-032, 7/93For rich burn, spark ignition engines, natural gasfueled, NOx ranging from:•640 – 940 ppmv with A/F adjustment at 10-40% efficiency•640 – 1060 ppmv with ignition timing retard at 0-40% efficiency•640 – 940 ppmv with A/F adjustment & ignition timing retard•135 ppmv with prestratified charged (PSC) at 10-40%efficiency•20 – 110 ppmv with NSCR at 90-98% efficiency•135 ppmv with Low-Emission Combustion (LEC) at 87%efficiencyFor lean burn, spark ignition engines, natural gasfueled, NOx ranging from:•860 – 1,170 ppmv with A/F adjustment at 5-30% efficiency•980 – 1260 ppmv with ignition timing retard at 0-20% efficiency•740 – 980 ppmv with A/F adjustment & ignition timing retard at 20-40% efficiency•125 ppmv with SCR at 90% efficiency•150 ppmv with Low-Emission Combustion (LEC) at 87%efficiencyFor diesel fueled and duel-fueled engines, NOx ranging from:•430 – 700 ppmv with ignition timing retard at 20-30% efficiency•90 – 125 ppmv with SCR at 80-90% efficiency•150 ppmv with Low-Emission Combustion (LEC) at 75%efficiencyNoneEPA ACT Document –Stationary ReciprocatingInternal Combustion Engines,Updated Information on NOxEmissions and ControlTechniques, EPA Contract No.68-D98-026, 9/1/00This document is supplemental to the 1993 ACT document, and the focus of this report is in thenatural gas transmission and storage industry because this is a large segment of stationary ICEs. Inaddition, this report focuses on Low Emission Combustion (LEC) control technology and costs.•Majority (97%) of the engines tested (460 tests total) was at 2 g/bhp-hr (or 150 ppmv for leanburn engines39) or below•All of new engines equipped with LEC: 1 – 2 g/bhp-hr (75 - 150 ppmv)•Retrofitted engines with LEC: 2 g/bhp39Using a conversion factor provided in the report for lean-burn engines controlled with LEC: 75 ppmv =1g/bhp-hrStaff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP DemonstrationAppendix 456June 2006Rule 1110.2 (Continued)EVALUATION FOR RACTNote that all engines subject to this rule locatedat RECLAIM facilities will be subject to RECLAIM rules, which is approved into SIP and is considered meetingfederal RACT. The engines that are not subject toRECLAIM will be subject to Rule 1110.2.Rule 1110.2 limits are beyond RACT levels because of the following reasons:Rule 1110.2 emission limit for engines is generally36 ppmv, which is within the lowest limit cited inthe ACT. The ACT cited that a lowest limit of 20ppmvcould be achieved with NSCR (or also referred to asthree-way catalyst). However, the ACT also indicated that most NSCR is applicable to rich-burn enginesonly and as a result, the CO and VOC emissions aretypically higher compared to other control options.In addition, the ACT indicated that there is a limitedexperience of NSCR application with fuels (e.g. sewage digester gas, landfill gas, and gases containing H2S) other than natural gases.For a specific group of engines (e.g. electric power generation), Rule 1110.2 limit is generally in arange of 115 ppmv – 144 ppmv40, assuming 80% efficiency,which is in the lowest limit that can be achieved for engines with retrofitted LEC, according to the information in the ACT.For portable engines, Rule 1110.2 requires 80 ppmv,which is lower than all of the limits for rich burn and lean burn natural gas engines, and lower thanthelimits that can be achieved with SCR for diesel anddual-fueled cited in the ACT.For portable compression ignition engines41, Rule 1110.2 has a range of limits from 535 – 770ppmv, which is in the upper range cited in the ACTfor diesel anddual-fueled engines. The ACT indicated that the lowest limits that can be achieved for diesel and dual-fueled engines equipped with SCRs are 90 – 125 ppmv.However the ACT also indicated that 1) there were limited applications for SCR. There were only 9 SCRinstallations with diesel engines and 27 with dual-fueled engines in the United States; and 2) there was a little experience with SCR application for a variable load engine due to ammonia injection controllimitations. In addition, in the updated 2000 version, the ACT indicated that LEC can achieve a levelof 1 g/bhp-hr – 2 g/bhp-hr (75 ppmv - 150 ppmv), but alsoindicated that 1) there was no LEC design for diesel compression engines, and 2) there were limited LEC applications for a limited number of dual-fuel engines.CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIONRule 1110.2, or RECLAIM, meets federal RACT requirements as explained above.40Assuming 80% efficiency, 36 ppmv x 80/25 = 115 ppmvor 45 ppmv x 80/25 = 144 ppmv41Compression ignition engines are liquid-fueled or diesel enginesStaff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP DemonstrationAppendix 457June 2006Rule 1118 – Control of Emissions from Refinery Flares (Amended 11/4/05)EMISSION LIMITMONITORING, TESTING AND RECORDKEEPINGRule 1118Applicable to all flaresused at petroleumrefineries, sulfurrecovery plants andhydrogen productionplants•Primary objective is to minimize flaring and thus reduce allcriteria pollutants•Flares must be operated in a smokeless manner•No specific limits for NOx, VOC, PM and CO•Performance target for SO2: Gradually decrease toless than0.5 tons per million barrels of crude processing capacity by2012.•Hydrogen sulfide limit is 160 ppmv, averaged over 3hours•Submit a flare minimization plan if do not meet theperformance target for SO2•Submit a flare monitoring and recordkeeping plan•Continuously video monitor image of flare tips•Continuous analyzers for vent gas HHV and sulfurconcentration•Daily sampling for flare events•Pay mitigation fee if do not meet the performance targetfor SO2EVALUATION FOR RACTEPA has no CTG/ATC for flares. In the CAPCOA 2003Potential All Feasible Measures, CAPCOA cited the following flare rules:Bay Area, Rule 12-11, Flare Monitoring at PetroleumRefineries, Adopted 6/4/03San Joaquin Valley, Rule 4311, Flares, Adopted 6/20/02San Luis Obispo County, Rule 426, Landfill Gas Emissions, Adopted 7/26/95Ventura County, Rule 74.17.1, Municipal Solid WasteLandfills, Amended 2/9/99The San Luis Obispo, and Ventura County rules contain NOx limit (0.06 lbs per million BTU) and CO limit (0.20 lbs per million BTU) for ground-level flares.The San Joaquin Valley rule contains NOx limits (from 0.068 to 0.52 lb per million BTU) and VOC limit(from 0.0013 to 0.14 lb per million BTU). However,these rules are for ground-level enclosed flares.According to the staff report of Rule 1118, only 1out of 27 flares subject to Rule 1118 is ground-level flare andthe remaining 26 are elevated flares. The staff report of Rule 1118 indicated that for elevated flare, post-combustion techniques (e.g. SCR, scrubber, low NOxburner) are not practical. The most practical control options are 1) flare minimization and 2) use ofrecovery system. In this aspect, Rule 1118 is comparable tothe Bay Area rule. In addition, the staff report of Rule 1118 indicated that this approach is consistent with EPA’s approach in the 1998 EPA program called “ThePetroleum Refinery Initiative”. Because of these reasons, even though Rule 1118 does not contain specific standards for NOx and VOC, it is representingRACTthrough work practices.CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIONRule 1118 sets RACT requirements for NOx and VOC through good engineering practices (e.g. implementingflare minimization, monitoring, sampling andrecordkeeping plan.Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP DemonstrationAppendix 458June 2006Rule 1133.2 – Emission Reductions from Co-Composting Operations (Adopted 1/10/03)EMISSION LIMITMONITORING, TESTINGAND RECORDKEEPINGRule 1133.2Applicable to all cocomposting operations•Performance standards:Enclosed storage area for active co-composting,Conduct curing using an aeration system that operates under negative pressureVent the exhaust to APC having 80% control efficiency or greater•Existing operations must reduce up to 70% baselineVOC and ammonia emissions. Baselineemission factors are 1.78 lbs of VOC per ton throughput and 2.93 lbs of ammonia per tonthroughput.•Source test every twoyears to demonstratecomplianceEVALUATION FOR RACTEPA has no CTG/ATC for co-composting operations. The 70% - 80% reduction of VOC represents typical control efficiency in biofiltration system.CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIONRule 1133.2 sets RACT requirements for co-composting operations.Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP DemonstrationAppendix 459June 2006Rule 1163 – Control of Vinyl Chloride Emissions (Amended 6/7/85)EVALUATION FOR RACTEPA has no CTG/ACT for this source and the provisions of this rule apply in addition to the provisionsof Regulation X, Subpart F, which is the federal NationalEmission Standard for Vinyl Chloride, adopted by without change to the District Regulation X. The federal NSPS should be considered as RACT for this sourcecategory.CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIONRule 1163 is beyond the levels required by federalRACT.

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 60 June 2006



# Appendix 5 - Major Source Facilities

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 61 June 2006 

# Table 5-1: List of Title V Facilities

	
 
 
	





 	
 


 	
 



 
		
	
 



 
		
	
 



 	 



 				 	


 



 	 !"	 	! 



 	

#
 



 	!! !
!!#
 



 				 	!
 



 	! 



 	$	
	 % 



 	$	
"	


 



 	$	
$!	$!
! 



 		
 


 		
 


 	

!
 



 		&		

 



 	!!
 



 	!		!# 



 	!&


 	&# 



 	!		
 



 	!$
$ 	&# 



 	
$!! 



 	!! 



 		%'		 !
 



 	"(	
!
) 



 	$*!	!#
 



 		

 



 		

# 



 		

# 



 	*!	$
	#
) 



 	
!
$!
 



 		
	
!
+!!, 



 		
	
-

 



 		
!$!
 



 	& 



 	
 



### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 62 June 2006	
 
 
	





 	
	 	 	!
 



 	
$!


 



 	
!	'!#	!" 



 	
!!	
		
	&
 



 	
&!' !&
)#+	 , 



 	
&
#
) 


 	
&
#
)'
	 


 	# 



 		!!

	
	 



 	$	
!

!
) 



 	$
&
!!	 



 		$	&	 



 	&	$"
 



 	
	$&!!!
$	! 



 	
#		!
!$ 



 	!
$
$!!
 



 	!
$
$!!
'
	 

 

 	&	$
	$	 



 		!!
 



 	!&	$! 



 	!&	$! 



 	"
!
 "	
 



 		

	!&
 



 		$	
$!! 



 		$	
$!!#
 



 		
!&!
 



  
	

 



  	
$	#
 


 	"$!
 


 		 	
	
) 

 		 	
	
)'
	  



 	
	
	
#&	! 	 
 

 	&
*
 



 	&
*
'
	 



 	!	
	
 



 	& 	$!!
# 	& 
 

 	
	
#
 



 

!
 



 '	&!# '
$$ 	 



 '
$!!# '	&!$ 	 
 

 !$! 	"
 


 &!	 



### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 63 June 2006	
 
 
	





 	!!!
	
	(!		!!! 
 

   	"!!	
 



 	
! 



 ""+!!, 



 	"&!
	 



 	"&	"
#
 



 	"&	"	
	
#
) 



 
!	
!
 



 
!	
!
 



 $
	
#
) 



  

 



 ! 
$!!#
 



 ! 
$!!#
'
	  


 
$

'
	 



 
$
#
) 



 
		"&&!& 



 $!

 



 $
		!	
	
 

 

  	
"#  	
"	 



 	 
#
)#		!!*! 	"#$ 	 

 

 	
!& 



 	
!&#

&
  


 	
	
$!	$! 



 	
	
!	!	
!&
! !
 
 

 	
	
!	!	
!&
! !
' 	 



 	
	!
! 



 	
	!		

'
	 
 

 	
	!
$!!
 



 	
	!
$!!
'
	 
 

 	

# 



 	 	
	
 



 	
"! 



 	!

	
	
 



 	!		)#
 



 	!		$!# 



 	!		$!#'
	 



 		
		&!
 



 $	!'!
	$	 



 
	!$!#
	  



 
	!!
 



 
	
$!
&	& 



 
	
$!
&	&'
	 



### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 64 June 2006	
 
 
	





 $
	

 



 $
	

 



 $
	

'
	 



 &	
#&	&! 



 	
	&
  

!	
  

 &$	
 



 !$ !$ 
 

 !! $!
#
 



 
$ 	
 



 	!	! 



 	
!! 



 	&!
 



 	&! 



  	
 



  			
	
 

 

  	!&	!	 
 



 !
	 



 
	&	

	! 



 	
!		

#
) 



 !!! 



 
!&

) 



 
&!


	'! 
 

 
&!
	
	
"	 



 
!$	$$
$


 
 

 
!$	$
$!!# 



 
!$	$
$!'
	 



 
	
!
 



 
	
	
!#$ 



 

 



 !	

#
 



 
		#
'
	 



 
		#
'
	 



 $
	
!&

 



 $
	
!&

 



 	!	

 



 	$	!# 	!	
!#
) 


 

	
	
	#
 
 

 !	

 



 
	
) 



 
"!	
 



 
"!	
'
	 



 

! 


### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 65 June 2006	
 
 
	





 !
	!
 



 ! 	!!
!&	$ 



 !	 



 !	'
	 



 

$		!
 



 

$		!
 



 $	
!	#	$	$
!	 
 

 $	

#$	
!!&!$ 	 

 

 $	
	
	
	 



 $	! 


 $
 



 $	$ &! 



 $%	 	! 



 $%	"	! 



 $(
	
 



 $!	&!#
 



 $!	&!#
'
	 



 $!
	
$! 


 $
	

 



 $.	 $!
 


 $
	&

 



 $
	&

'
	 



 $ $
!
 



 $	!$!$!
 



 $
	!!
 



 $
	
 !
 



 $

'$	$! 



 $
$!!
 



 )))

	&



 
 

 
#	$	
&	$
 
 

 	!!	
! 



 	!

		$! 



 	!
!!
 



 
# 



 !
$# 



 

$!
#	!	 



 
"	
	 



 -

)##!&$)! 
 


 %
! 



 	 '#$	!	!!	 !
 
 

 	&$	!
!!& 		
! 
 

 	&$&$
#	&$	!
 
 

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 66 June 2006	
 
 
	





 	$
	
 



 	
	#	$		!
  


 	
$!#
 



 
$!	
!
!) 



  
!$$$!# 



  



 $&!	
 



 $&!	
 



 $		!	
/ 
 

 

"
&		 



 		 	! 



 
	
		!
 


 
	!&
!
$ 



 $")	
$!
!
!
 



 	"	


	
	#
) 

 

 	$!
! 



 
$ 	"
 



 
$ 	"
'
	 



 $	
 	
#&
$ 



 '	
&		#
) 



 !! 



 
	$
!
 



 
	$
!
'
	 



  

		#$ 		!	! 

 

 	
	!
 


 	
	!
'
	 



 	

 !
!!! 



 	!!!! 



 	$!"!"$! 



 

!! 



 

!!'		

) 


 
	
 



 
		
	
!	

	% 



 
		%	
$ 



 	'	 



 	'	'
	 



 	$	$ 



 


 



 	
&	
$!
 



 
$	# !$ 



 
 &
!
 


 $
!&! 



### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 67 June 2006	
 
 
	





 $!&$ 	!!#
#	
/ 

 

 $!&$ 	!!#
#	
/'
  



 '! 



 	&	"	
	
 



 	&!!
 



 	&!!'
	 



 	&	!
#$
&	$
& 


 
$!!
 



  ! 



  !!
 



  !!
'
	 



 !	
!
 



 !	
!
'
	 



 	$	

$!!) 



 $	

 



 &&
(# 


 &		"! 



 &	
$ 
!$ 			
  



 &	 
	
 



 &	 " $!
 


 &	!(

	
		
 

 

 &
! " 



 &	 
!!
 



 &	
 



 &


	
	
 



 &


	
	
'
	 



 &$
 



 &$
'
	 



 &!	"	
#
 



 &!	"	
#
'
	 



 &	!
! 



 &&		"
!	"	
'!
) 



 &


	&!	 



 ))
! 

 



 	%% 


 !!
	
!
 



 !!!	
 


 !!!	
'
	 


 
$	%!
 



 
$	%!
'
	 



 
$!	
	
!!'	 



 
$!	
!&

 



### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 68 June 2006	
 
 
	





 
	
$!	
'&
 



 
	
$&#
 



 
	
$&#
'
	 



 

	
 	!!$! 



 
!
$	
 



 

	
	%!
 



 

	
		 



 

	
	&%		 

 

 
!	 	
$! 



 
!

!!
#	!
 
 

 ! 



 		 



 
$!!#	


 



 & 



 ) ))
 



 	"!
$
#'	&	# 

 	((& 	& 



 	((& 	&
 



 		
!&
 


  #
) 



 
!

$!!
) 



 
!
	! 



 &	
!
$!
 



 &
 $$!
! 



 &
 $$!
!'
	 



 &
&)	
	

 



 &
!
	
	
	

 



 
	&	
!
 



 !

#

& 



 ""

 


 ")) 	!!#
) 



 "	!	
& 



 "	!	
&'
	 



 "	!
$	
&!	 


 "	'	$	
#
 



 "	
!
 



 " '	"$$
)'
 
 

 " '	"$$
)'
'
 	 



 "
	$$"
#$ 	$	
$ 
 


 "

 



 "



 



 ""&  


### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 69 June 2006	
 
 
	





 "!	"	&
 



 "!&$ 



 "			 



 !!&! 



 )	)!	!#
'
	 



 	
!	
	
$!! 



 	#$	
	! 



 	#$	 


 	#$&	 
	
!	
 

 

 	#$&	
!
	
!	
 
 

 	#$!	$
	
!
 
 

 	#$	
	
!	
 
 

 	&	 '	$	
 



 	&	&!#"

$$	 
 

 	)#

	!$ 



 	)#	
	
!	& 



 	)#
	$	
 



 	)#	
&!	!$	
 
 

 	)#!&$ 



 	$
"!
 



 	&	 	&&!& 



 	

 



 	!	$) 


 	
!$	
 



 	! 	&	
) 



 	! 	&	
)'
	 



 	!
	$
	"	
 



 	% 


 	&
* 



  



 !&	&
 



 !&	&
'
	 



 &	!
 



 
$!!
 



 !
 "	

	 



 &	&%
 



 &	&%
 



 	
$	
 



 
 	&#! 



 
 	&
	
 


 
 	&	$	
 



  
$!!	
	 



### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 70 June 2006	
 
 
	





 !	
!$!	 



 !	
!!
	
! 



 !	
!!
	
! 



 !	
!!
	
! 



 "!!
#/ 



 )) 


 ))'
	 


 !

 



 		&'
	 



 		&'
	 



 	$!
'	&		&!
 



 	
	#!	 



 	
'
$#

&	)$ 	 

 

 	
'
$#

&	)$ 	'
  



 	
!$ 
$! 



 		!

 



 	"
$$!'
	 



 	"
$$!'
	 



 	!"'
 



 	!"'	
#
 



 	&	!$

!&

 



 

	 
!
 


 $	)) 



 

	 
!
 



 $!
 



 

!!#$ 



 
(!		
#
) 



 	!!
 


 		!	
	 



 	
	
 



 $	&
!
 



 $	&
!#
) 



 &! 



 	!#
 



 $!	 %
 



 "&	$		
 



  
 



 $	 



 $&&$
!#
) 



 $&
 



 
 



 
	&&
 



### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 71 June 2006	
 
 
	





 
	&&
'
	 



 
 



 
	
	
 



 !
	
#$	 



 !
	
#	$ 



 
	!	!
	  



 
	
 



 
$!
 



 
!

			
 



 
	
	!	)$$)$) 
 

 
 	!! 



 

#
) 



 
	
	! 


 


) 



 
$	
 


 
"

# 


 
$
! 



 
&	
#		$ 

 
&	
#		$ 



 
&	
#		$'
	 


 
&	
!	!!
!!!' 	 



 
&!
!&	!% 



 


 



 


'
	 



 
		
 



 	"$
!#
 



  &	$!!! 


  &	$!!!'
	 



 &
 



 $
"
 



 $
"
'
	 



 !
'&
 



 	

#$#  



 	

#$#
$	 



 	

#$#	 



 	

#$#!	
	 



 
!

 



 
!' "		!!
	

 



 ) ) 	!!$)
 



 ) )	!
! 



 	  $$!#	 	#$ 	 
 

 		$!
 



### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 72 June 2006	
 
 
	





 	!		 



 	!&
 



 	 



 		"$)
 


 	"	 	 



 	"	 	'
	 



 	"
!

!!
 



 	!	$
	 



 	!	$
	#$+!!, 



 	
	#	$
	
#
 



 	
	!	!#
	

	$ 



 	
$!! 



 &
	!	
 



 $

! 



 
	
	! 



 	
!!
# 	!! 
 


 	$	 



 $! 



 	$!
 



 
	!!&!
 



 	!$!!' 



 	!$$$!#
 



 	!!!	& 



 	
$	
 



 	"		
 



 	$	
	!
 



 
		&!+!!, 



 	%	
 



 	%	
 



 !
	

 



 !
!		!
+!, 

 !
!		!
'
	 
 

 
$!!
)#
!	 



 $
	!!#
 



 !! 



 $$!
 



 !!! 	

 



 !!
	
!&
	
(	
 



 !!
 



 !!!&! 



 $
!!&$ 



 -		 	
#
 



### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 73 June 2006	
 
 
	





 - $'!
! 

 

 - $'!
!'
	 



 - $	!
 !&
 
 

 - $

	$ 



 -
	#%	$ 

 

 -
 


 ))$

!
!#	$ 

 ))$

!
!#	$'
	  



 	$	"
$!!
 



 		
!	!
 



 	$!
 



 	!!$!
!
 



 

 



 
&$
$!!
 



 	

	
$	#
) 



  !!	
	 



 !
	 



 %	#%	 		
	
 

 

 %	#%	 		
	
'
  



 
!



 



 
!!
 



 &$	
) 



 
"		!&$
$ 



 

	
#
) 


 !
"
 



 !$	
		
 



 !$
+!!, 



  
!
&
 



 $!$
	$	&! 



 &#
 


 &#
'
	 


 &	!
 



 		 
! 



 		 
!'
	 



 		 % 



 		 %'
	 



 	" $
 



 !&$!#
		 $ 	 

 

 !			
$$ 



 !	
&
*!&!	&	&
 



 !	
!&&!	 



 !	
' 	

	
!#
) 



### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 74 June 2006	
 
 
	





 !	
	


&!	 



 !	
 
	$

	$+, 
 

 !	
$	! 


 !	
$!&
	
!$ 	 
 

 !	
$ 

 



 !	

		
 



 !&!!	
 



 !&!!	
'
	 



 !&!% 	"	
#
 



 !
!	
!&!
 



 !!	$!	
!
	$	!! 
 

 !	
+&	!, 



 !	
!
!

		
! 
 

 !	
!
!

		
! 



 !	
!
!

		
! 

 

 !-	!&!#
 



 !
$$ 



 !&! &&#!! && 
 

 !&$!& 



 !&(! 



 !&(!'
	 



 !		
	
 



 !		
	
 



 !		
	
'
	 



 !	

!	 


 !	

!	'
	 



 !
	

 



 !!!$
 



 !
	

 



 !
	

'
	 



 !%	!&!"!
#!%	!	 
 

 !"
&!
 



 !	
$	
 



 !&&	&	! 



 !
!
	
 



 !'!

	

!!#
 
 

 !'!

	

!!#
 
 

 !
	!!#&	


$)!!#
) 
 

 !
!
 



 !	$!
 


 !		!
		$!		 
 

 !	&	&!
	
"
$ 	 
 

### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 75 June 2006	
 
 
	





 !'	!	
 



 !
!
$#!
*!	!$ 
 


 !
!




#	
"!
!
 
 


 !&
	
			
 



 !&
	
		&! 



 !&! 
 



 !	
!&! 



 !) 
	$
$	
 



 !	
$	$	 % 



 !	!
#!
$ 



 !!	#
 


 !	"
		 



 !	"
		 



 !	"
		'
	 



 !&


 



 !	!!
$ 



 !
$	
!	!
 



 !
$	
!	!#
 



 !
	
	
	
! 



 !
	
	
	
! 



 !

&!&&!& 



 !
!&
	

	
$ 



 !
$!!

	
	
 

 !
$!!

	
	
'
	  



 


 



 	 #
 


 	 #
'
	 


 	 



 	
$
$!! 



 	'$

 



 &

 



 $
$ 



 		"
 



 	!&			! 



 %
	!

!!!!	
		
	 
 

 %$!


 



 & 	

	 



 & '"
# 
 
 


 & '"# 
))) 
 

 &	!!#
 



 &$

 



 &!

 



### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 76 June 2006	
 
 
	





 &$$

	
! 



 &&	 



 &&
 



 &	$#	$	"	
$ 



 &	
  



 &	
 '
	 



 &	
 	
 


 &	
 	
 



 &- 



 &!

 



 &	
 



 &%$
 



 &	%	 $
$#
) 



 &
#	'$	
$!
 
 

 &	"	

 



 &!
 	& 


 $	
$!$
	
	 



 $	
$!$
	
	 



  ! 



 

)#'
	
$#$ 	 



 
#
)'
	
$#$ 	 


 
#
)'
	
$#$ 	'
	 

 

 !!		
$!!
 



 
	
#	
$ 	'
	 



 &	
	
 



 	
 



 	
'
	 



 	!		
 



 
$	


 



 
$	


'
	 
 


 
$!

!!#
 



 
$!

!!#
'
	 


 
$!#
) 



 
# 


 
#+!
!!
, 



 !#
) 



 !#
)'
	 



 !		!	0! 	
	
$ 


 !*#	$	
#!	 
 

 )!)#$
	 



 )!)
	
$!	!	
	
 



 
$	
!
 


### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 77 June 2006	
 
 
	





 
$ $%#
 



 
$!	!	
 



 
$!	!	
'
	 



 
	
+
!!
, 



 
!	+!
!!
, 



 
!	!$!#) 



 
!	
	#!	
! 



 
!!	
	#&	&!
! 



 !#	
!	$
!	
$ 

 

 !#	
!		!$	
 
 

 !! 



 !! 



 ! 



 	 



 		(
 



 	
! 



 	 !
!!
!
 



 	
	
	
 



 	
	
	
'
	 



 	!!! 



 		!
 



 		!
 



 (

	
!! 



 

#&$ 



 !#
 


 !#
'
	 


 !#
) 



 !#
) 



 !#
)'
	 



 !#
)'
	 



 !
'	!
!	(!	#
 



 !	
!$	$
 



 !		!	
 



 !		
 



 	&

 



 	$



 



  '	!!
 



 $	&!
 



 &	$
 



 !
&! 



 !
	$	
 



 !
	$	
'
	 



### Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 78 June 2006	
 
 
	





 !
!	
	
 



 !
 
$ 



 &	!	
 



 &	!	
'
	 



 &
	

#!	 
 

 $



 



 $


$
	 
 

 	$	

 



 
!
$!		


 



 

 



 $	
$$)
 



 $$!!
 



 "$
 



 %%!+	$		, 



 (	
 



 (	

 



 (	
'
	 

Staff Report8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP DemonstrationAppendix 679June 2006Table 5-2: Example of Information Available For Title V FacilityPermitNumberEquipmentNOx(lbs/day)VOC(lbs/day) Applicable RuleF67238 OVEN, BAKING1 0 1107,407,409F67240 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT0 48 1107,1145,1171,1401,404F67241 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT0 48 1107,1145,1171,1401F67242 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT0 48 1107,1145,1171,1401F67243 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT0 48 1107,1145,1171,1401F67244 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT0 8 1107,1145,1171,1401F67245 SPRAY BOOTH/ENCLOSURE, POWDER COATING SYSTEM0 0 1107,1171,1401,404,405F67247 OVEN, POWDER COATING2 0 1107,1401,407F67248 SPRAY BOOTH/ENCLOSURE, POWDER COATING SYSTEM0 0 1107,1171,1401,404,405F67249 SPRAY BOOTH/ENCLOSURE, POWDER COATING SYSTEM0 0 1107,1171,404,405F67250 OVEN, COOKING OR CURING2 0 1107,407,409F67251 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT0 48 1107,1145,1171,404F67252 SPRAY BOOTH/ENCLOSURE, POWDER COATING SYSTEM0 0 1107,1171,404,405F67253 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT0 8 1107,1145,1171,1401,404F67255 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT0 8 1107,1145,1171,404F67256 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT0 0 1107,1145,1171,1401,404F67257 SOLV RECLAIM STILL (1 STAGE) MISC. SOLV0 1 1401F67258 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT0 0 1107,1145,1171,1401,404F67259 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT0 43 1107,1145,1171,1401,404F67260 OVEN, BAKING5 0 1107,404,407,409F67261 OVEN, DRYING1 0 1107,404,407,409F67262 OVEN, DRYING4 0 1107,404,407,409F67263 OVEN, DRYING2 0 1107,404,407,409F67264 MISC HYDROCARBONS EVAPORATION0 0 1107,1401,404F67265 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT0 8 1107,1145,1171,1401,404F80806 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT0 8 1107,1145,1171,404Note: Emissions of NOx or VOC = (30-day averaged emissions in lbs/day) x (365 days/year).