64530 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2018 / Notices 

11See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

12For a full discussion of this clarification, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

13See Order. 

1See Antidumping Duty Orders: Steel Concrete 

Reinforcing Bars from Belarus, Indonesia, Latvia, 

Moldova, People’s Republic of China, Poland, 

Republic of Korea and Ukraine, 66 FR 46777 

(September 7, 2001) (Orders). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 83 

FR 25436 (June 1, 2018). 

3See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from 

Belarus, the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia, 

Latvia, Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine: Final 

Results of Expedited Third Sunset Reviews of the 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 83 FR 50344 (October 5, 

2018), and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum (Rebar 2018 Sunset Final). 

specific ad valorem duty assessment 

rates based on the ratio of the total 

amount of antidumping duties 

calculated for the examined sales to the 

total entered value of the examined 

sales to that importer, and we will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries covered 

by this review. If Pidilite’s weightedaverage dumping margin continues to be 

zero or de minimis, or the importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties.11

In accordance with our ‘‘automatic 

assessment’’ practice, for entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by Pidilite for which it did 

not know its merchandise was destined 

for the United States, we will instruct 

CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at 

the all-others rate.12

We intend to issue instructions to 

CBP 15 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of the 

notice of final results of administrative 

review for all shipments of the subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the publication date, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for Pidilite will be 

the rate established in the final results 

of this review, except if the rate is de 

minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1) (i.e., less than 0.50 

percent), in which case the cash deposit 

rate will be zero; (2) for merchandise 

exported by manufacturers or exporters 

not covered in this review but covered 

in a prior completed segment of the 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recentlycompleted segment; (3) if the exporter is 

not a firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original investigation, but 

the manufacturer is, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate established for the 

most recently-completed segment for 

the manufacturer of the merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

manufacturers or exporters will 

continue to be 27.48 percent, the allothers rate established in the less-thanfair-value investigation.13 These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: December 11, 2018. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Discussion of the Methodology 

A. Comparisons to Normal Value 

1. Determination of Comparison Method 

2. Results of the Differential Pricing 

Analysis 

B. Date of Sale 

C. Product Comparisons 

D. Constructed Export Price 

E. Normal Value 

1. Home Market Viability and Selection of 

Comparison Market 

2. Level of Trade (LOT) 

F. Cost of Production (COP) Analysis 

1. Calculation of COP 

2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices 

3. Results of the COP Test 

G. Calculation of NV Based on Comparison 

Market Prices 

H. Currency Conversion 

IV. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2018–27243 Filed 12–14–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–449–804, A–455–803, A–560–811, A– 

570–860, A–822–804, A–823–809, A– 

841–804 

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars From 

Belarus, the People’s Republic of 

China, Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, 

Poland, and Ukraine: Continuation of 

the Antidumping Duty Orders 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of the 

determinations by the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) and the 

International Trade Commission (ITC) 

that revocation of the antidumping duty 

(AD) orders on steel concrete reinforcing 

bars (rebar) from Belarus, the People’s 

Republic of China (China), Indonesia, 

Latvia, Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine 

would likely lead to a continuation or 

recurrence of dumping and material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States, Commerce is publishing a notice 

of continuation of the AD orders. 

DATES: Applicable December 17, 2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Keith Haynes, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5139. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 1, 2018, Commerce published 

the notice of initiation of the third 

sunset reviews of the Orders 1 on rebar 

from Belarus, China, Indonesia, Latvia, 

Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine, 

pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act).2 As a result of its reviews, 

Commerce determined that revocation 

of the Orders on rebar from Belarus, 

China, Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, 

Poland, and Ukraine would likely lead 

to the continuation or recurrence of 

dumping.3 Commerce, therefore, 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2018 / Notices 64531 

4 Id. 

5See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from 

Belarus, the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia, 

Latvia, Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine: Final 

Results of Expedited Third Sunset Reviews of the 

Antidumping Duty Orders; Determination, 83 FR 

63188 (December 7, 2018). 

6 Id. 

notified the ITC of the magnitude of the 

margins of dumping likely to prevail 

were the Orders revoked.4

On December 7, 2018, the ITC 

published its determinations, pursuant 

to sections 751(c) and 752 of the Act, 

that revocation of the Orders on rebar 

from Belarus, China, Indonesia, Latvia, 

Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine would 

likely lead to continuation or recurrence 

of material injury to an industry in the 

United States within a reasonably 

foreseeable time.5

Scope of the Orders 

The product covered by the orders is 

all steel concrete reinforcing bars sold in 

straight lengths, currently classifiable in 

the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) under item 

numbers 7214.20.00, 7228.30.8050, 

7222.11.0050, 7222.30.0000, 

7228.60.6000, 7228.20.1000, or any 

other tariff item number. Specifically 

excluded are plain rounds (i.e., nondeformed or smooth bars) and rebar that 

has been further processed through 

bending or coating.6

Continuation of the Orders 

As a result of the determinations by 

Commerce and the ITC that revocation 

of the Orders would likely lead to a 

continuation or a recurrence of dumping 

and material injury to an industry in the 

United States, pursuant to section 

751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the 

continuation of the Orders on rebar from 

Belarus, China, Indonesia, Latvia, 

Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine. U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection will 

continue to collect AD cash deposits at 

the rates in effect at the time of entry for 

all imports of subject merchandise. 

The effective date of the continuation 

of the Orders will be the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice of continuation. Pursuant to 

section 751(c)(2) of the Act, Commerce 

intends to initiate the next five-year 

reviews of these orders not later than 30 

days prior to the fifth anniversary of the 

effective date of continuation. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return/destruction or conversion to 

judicial protective order of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). 

Failure to comply is a violation of the 

APO which may be subject to sanctions. 

These sunset reviews and notice are 

in accordance with sections 751(c), 752, 

and published pursuant to 777(i)(1) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). 

Dated: December 11, 2018. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2018–27239 Filed 12–14–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

[Docket Number: 181101997–8999–02] 

Developing a Privacy Framework 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology, U.S. Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice; extension of comment 

period. 

SUMMARY: The National Institute of 

Standards and Technology (NIST) 

extends the period for submitting 

written comments on the request for 

information (RFI) entitled ‘‘Developing a 

Privacy Framework,’’ published on 

November 14, 2018. The public 

comment period was originally to close 

on December 31, 2018; the comment 

period is extended to now end on 

January 14, 2019. NIST is taking this 

action to provide additional time to 

submit comments because multiple 

interested parties have expressed 

difficulty in submitting comments by 

the original deadline and have asked for 

an extension. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before January 14, 2019 at 5:00 p.m. 

Eastern Time. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be 

submitted by mail to Katie MacFarland, 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 

2000, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. 

Electronic submissions may be sent to 

privacyframework@nist.gov, and may be 

in any of the following formats: HTML, 

ASCII, Word, RTF, or PDF. Please cite 

‘‘Developing a Privacy Framework’’ in 

all correspondence. Comments received 

by the deadline will be posted at http:// 

www.nist.gov/privacyframework 

without change or redaction, so 

commenters should not include 

information they do not wish to be 

posted (e.g., personal or confidential 

business information). Comments that 

contain profanity, vulgarity, threats, or 

other inappropriate language or content 

will not be posted or considered. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

questions about the RFI contact: Naomi 

Lefkovitz, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, NIST, MS 2000, 100 Bureau 

Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, 

telephone (301) 975–2924, email 

privacyframework@nist.gov. Please 

direct media inquiries to NIST’s Public 

Affairs Office at (301) 975–NIST. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

November 14, 2018, NIST published a 

notice and RFI in the Federal Register 

(83 FR 56824), about developing a 

privacy framework. The notice 

requested public comments on or before 

December 31, 2018. Multiple interested 

parties have expressed difficulty in 

submitting comments by the original 

deadline, and have asked for an 

extension. In light of these requests, 

NIST extends the period for submitting 

public comments to January 14, 2018. 

Previously submitted comments do not 

need to be resubmitted. 

Kevin A. Kimball, 

Chief of Staff. 

[FR Doc. 2018–27248 Filed 12–14–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

RIN 0648–XG454 

Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to 

Specified Activities; Taking Marine 

Mammals Incidental to US 101/ 

Chehalis River Bridge-Scour Repair in 

Washington State 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental 

harassment authorization. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

regulations implementing the Marine 

Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) as 

amended, notification is hereby given 

that we have issued an incidental 

harassment authorization (IHA) to 

Washington State Department of 

Transportation (WSDOT) to take small 

numbers of marine mammals, by 

harassment, incidental to US 101/ 

Chehalis River Bridge-Scour Repair in 

Washington State. 

DATES: This authorization is valid from 

July 15, 2019, through February 15, 

2020. 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1