alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 03-128 October 3, 2003

NRC RENEWS LICENSE FOR ST. LUCIE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

FOR AN ADDITIONAL 20 YEARS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has renewed the operating license of the St. Lucie

Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, located southeast of Fort Pierce, Florida, for an additional 20 years. The

plant is operated by Florida Power & Light Company (FPL).

FPL submitted its license renewal application to the NRC on November 29, 2001. With the

renewal, the license for St. Lucie 1 is extended from March 1, 2016, to March 1, 2036, and the license

for unit 2 is extended from April 6, 2023, to April 6, 2043.

The NRC’s environmental review is described in a site-specific supplement to the NRC’s

“Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Power Plants," (NUREG1437, Supplement 11). In the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, issued in May

2003, the staff concluded that there were no impacts that would preclude renewal of the license for

environmental reasons. Two public meetings to discuss the environmental review were held near the

plant on April 3, 2002, and November 3, 2002.

In its “Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of St. Lucie Nuclear Plant,

Units 1 and 2,” issued in July 2003, the NRC staff concluded that there were no safety concerns that

would preclude license renewal, because the licensee had demonstrated the capability to manage the

effects of plant aging. In addition, the NRC conducted inspections of the plants to verify information

submitted by the licensee. Copies of these documents are available on the NRC Web site at this

address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/st-lucie.html .

On September 17, 2003, the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards -- an independent

body of technical experts which advises the Commission -- issued its recommendation that the

operating licenses for St. Lucie, Units 1 and 2, be renewed. That recommendation is contained in

"Report on the Safety Aspects of the License Renewal Application for the St. Lucie Nuclear Plant,

Units 1 and 2." A copy of this document will be available on the NRC Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/letters/2003/ .
- 2 -

The St. Lucie license renewal brings the total number of renewals to 18 units. A complete

listing of completed renewal applications, as well as those currently under review, can be found on the

NRC’s Web site at this address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications.html .

###
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 208 (Thursday, October 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24142]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2004-78]


Petitions for Exemption; Dispositions of Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA published a notice in the Federal Register on October 
18, 2004, containing a summary of certain dispositions of certain 
petitions previously received. This document makes a correction to a 
docket number assigned to Helicorp, Inc.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy Adams, telephone (202) 267-
8033.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This correction is effective on October 28, 2004.

Correction

    In the notice, FR Doc. 04-23256, published on October 18, 2004 (69 
FR 61431) on page 61432, in the third column, on the first line, 
correct the Docket Number from ``FAA-2002-17147'' to read ``FAA-2002-
14147.''

    Issued in Washington, DC on October 22, 2004.
Anthony F. Fazio,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 04-24142 Filed 10-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
ENVIROTEST SYSTEMS CORP.
             EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
                (Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

Loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares
outstanding plus incremental shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding
options and warrants using the treasury stock method.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Three                       Six
                                                      Months Ended               Months Ended
                                                        March 31,                  March 31,
                                                  1997           1996          1997          1996
                                                 --------      --------      --------      --------
<S>                                              <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>      
LOSS

Loss                                             $ (5,727)     $(16,415)     $(11,901)     $(10,827)
                                                 ========      ========      ========      ========

LOSS PER COMMON AND
COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE

Weighted average number of shares outstanding      16,620        16,571        16,620        16,485

Net effect of dilutive stock options based on
      the treasury method using the average
      market price of common stock (a)                646           703           660           784
                                                 --------      --------      --------      --------

Common stock and common stock equivalents          17,266        17,274        17,280        17,269
                                                 ========      ========      ========      ========

Loss per common and common
      equivalent share                           $  (0.33)     $  (0.95)     $  (0.69)     $  (0.63)
                                                 ========      ========      ========      ========

LOSS PER COMMON SHARE -
ASSUMING FULL DILUTION

Weighted average number of shares outstanding      16,620        16,571        16,620        16,485

Net effect of dilutive stock options based on
      the treasury method using the end of
      period market price of common, if
      higher than average (a)                         646           703           660           784
                                                 --------      --------      --------      --------

Common stock and common stock equivalents          17,266        17,274        17,280        17,269
                                                 ========      ========      ========      ========

Loss per common and common
      equivalent share                           $  (0.33)     $  (0.95)     $  (0.69)     $  (0.63)
                                                 ========      ========      ========      ========
</TABLE>

Notes:
(a)   Common stock equivalents represent stock options and warrants.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23782]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--American Brush Manufacturers Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the American Brush 
Manufacturers Association (``ABMA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: American 
Brush Manufacturers Association, Aurora, IL. The nature and scope of 
ABMA's standards development activities are: To maintain voluntary 
standards for the brush manufacturers industry that assist users and 
consumers in the standardization of safety requirements regarding power 
driven brushes and labeling requirements concerning upright brooms and 
wet mops.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23782 Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF THE RESTAURANT COMPANY AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,150
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,926
<ALLOWANCES>                                       656
<INVENTORY>                                      5,375
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,911
<PP&E>                                         246,607
<DEPRECIATION>                                 115,324
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 195,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,025
<BONDS>                                        159,101
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,105)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   195,638
<SALES>                                        276,935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               299,423
<CGS>                                           78,576
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  230,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                68,314
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   672<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,045
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,269
<INCOME-TAX>                                       160
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,109
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,109
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>The provision for doubtful accounts and notes is presented within operating
expenses in the accompanying financial statements and is included in total costs
above.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 18.3 Transfers. ( a ) *Transfer to another conveyance.* Merchandise being transported in-bond may be transferred to another conveyance at any time. CBP notification is not required. The transfer to one or more conveyances will not extend the maximum in-transit time set forth in § 18.1(i).
( b ) *Transfer to another bonded carrier.* Except as provided in § 18.31(d)(3), when merchandise is transferred to a bonded carrier that assumes the liability for the in-bond shipment, a report of arrival for the merchandise must be filed by the original bonded carrier and a new in-bond application must be filed by the subsequent bonded carrier pursuant to § 18.1.
( c ) *Transfer of merchandise covered by a TIR Carnet generally prohibited.* Merchandise covered by a TIR carnet may not be transferred except in cases in which the unlading of the merchandise from a container or road vehicle is necessitated by casualty en route. In the event of transfer, a TIR approved container or road vehicle must be used if available. If the transfer takes place under CBP supervision, the CBP officer must execute a certificate of transfer on the appropriate TIR carnet voucher.
( d ) *Transfer by bonded cartmen.* All transfers to or from the conveyance or warehouse of merchandise being transported in-bond must be made under the provisions of part 125 of this chapter and at the expense of the parties in interest, unless the bond of the carrier on CBP Form 301, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.63 of this chapter or a TIR carnet, is liable for the safekeeping and delivery of the merchandise while it is being transferred.
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.69 Samples to Great Britain and Ireland under reciprocal agreement.

Descriptive lists, or their electronic equivalents, of samples taken to Great Britain and Ireland by commercial travelers of the United States under the joint declarations of December 3 and 8, 1910 (State Department treaty series 552), shall be required in triplicate, verified by the affidavit of the commercial traveler before a Customs officer, and shall show that the samples are for use as models or patterns for the purpose of obtaining orders and not for sale and that the lists contain a full description of the articles. One copy shall be retained and the others shall be delivered to the commercial traveler—one for the identification of the samples on their return to the United States and one for the use of the foreign customs authorities. The latter copy must have been attested by a consular officer of the country concerned in the United States.

[28 FR 14663, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61284, Oct. 13, 2015]
### §441a–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 441a–1 was editorially reclassified as section 30117 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-03-059 September 30, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

 NRC’S REGION I OFFICE NOW RESPONSIBLE 

FOR REGION II MATERIALS LICENSES

 As of Oct. 1st, the NRC’s Region I Office in King of Prussia, Pa., will assume

responsibility for nuclear materials licenses that were previously under the jurisdiction of the

agency’s Region II Office in Atlanta. The Region I Office is responsible for the Northeastern

United States while the Region II Office oversees the Southeastern portion of the country.

 About 800 nuclear materials licenses will be transferred to Region I in the consolidation.

Region I will now be responsible for licensing, inspection, event response, enforcement and

allegations pertaining to those licenses, in addition to the 1,700 materials licenses it already

handles.

 The change is part of an agency-wide initiative designed to improve the effectiveness

and efficiency of the NRC’s nuclear materials program. It is expected to have minimal impact on

license-holders. The Region II materials inspection staff will remain in NRC’s Region II office

in Atlanta. 

 In response to direction from the NRC’s Commissioners, the agency’s staff undertook a

study of the most effective way to regulate its nuclear materials licensees. That careful review

led to the decision to have Region I handle the Region II materials licenses. Other changes

include Region II assuming responsibility for the inspection of all nuclear fuel cycle facilities

regulated by the NRC.

 The materials licenses being transferred to Region I are largely in the states of Virginia,

West Virginia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. NRC-licensed Federal facilities in

Agreement States will also be transferred to Region I. Under the NRC’s Agreement State

Program, states can assume responsibility for regulating nuclear materials within their borders

that would otherwise be overseen by the NRC. To do that, they must establish regulations that

are at least as stringent as those used by the NRC.

 In Region II, most of the states have become Agreement States.
 #
§ 19.25 Credit to be applied under various forms of withdrawals. ( a ) The warehouse entry account of the plant designated in the withdrawal to receive credit for the exportation shall be credited with the following: ( 1 ) The quantity of dutiable metal exported.
( 2 ) The wastage in effect on the date of entry at the plant of initial treatment of such materials.
( 3 ) The proportion of any other dutiable metals in the importation being credited which were lost at the said plant in the production of a quantity of dutiable metal equal to that exported.
( b ) If credit is being applied to a charge set up by a theoretical transfer under § 19.24 at the plant designated in the withdrawal to receive the credit, the wastages to be applied shall be those set up at such plant in connection with the theoretical transfer, irrespective of the date of the withdrawal.
( c ) On the transfer of dutiable metal to a bonded storage warehouse, credit shall be applied at the plant designated in the withdrawal to receive the credit in the manner provided for in paragraph (a) of this section with respect to withdrawals for exportation. The charge so credited at the plant shall be set up on the warehouse entry account of the storage warehouse to which the dutiable metal has been transferred. In the case of the withdrawal of dutiable metal for transfer to a bonded manufacturing warehouse, credit shall be applied in the same manner at the plant designated in the withdrawal to receive the credit, but the charge set upon the warehouse entry account of the bonded manufacturing warehouse shall be limited to the quantity of dutiable metal transferred to such warehouse.
### §1020. Publication in Federal Register; reservation of mineral rights

Geothermal resources in lands the surface of which has passed from Federal ownership but in which the minerals have been reserved to the United States shall not be developed or produced except under geothermal leases made pursuant to this chapter. If the Secretary of the Interior finds that such development is imminent, or that production from a well heretofore drilled on such lands is imminent, he shall so report to the Attorney General, and the Attorney General is authorized and directed to institute an appropriate proceeding in the United States district court of the district in which such lands are located, to quiet the title of the United States in such resources, and if the court determines that the reservation of minerals to the United States in the lands involved included the geothermal resources, to enjoin their production otherwise than under the terms of this chapter: Provided, That upon an authoritative judicial determination that Federal mineral reservation does not include geothermal resources the duties of the Secretary of the Interior to report and of the Attorney General to institute proceedings, as hereinbefore set forth, shall cease.

(Pub. L. 91–581, §21, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1572; Pub. L. 109–58, title II, §236(1), (3), (19), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 671, 673.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2005—Pub. L. 109–58 inserted section catchline, struck out "(b)" before "Geothermal", substituted "does not include geothermal resources" for "does not include geothermal steam and associated geothermal resources", and struck out subsec. (a) which read as follows: "Within one hundred and twenty days after December 24, 1970, the Secretary shall cause to be published in the Federal Register a determination of all lands which were included within any known geothermal resources area on December 24, 1970. He shall likewise publish in the Federal Register from time to time his determination of other known geothermal resources areas specifying in each case the date the lands were included in such area; and".
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Dean M.
Leavitt, certify that:

1.  I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of U.S. Wireless Data, Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The
registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors:

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: January
26, 2005

/s/ Dean M.
Leavitt
Dean M. Leavitt
Chairman of the Board
       (Former Chief Executive Officer
       and acting Principal Executive Officer)

---