alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 13, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

132648 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver & (63) Marilyn Kelly (64) Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices FREDIE STOKES, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 132648 COA: 268544 WCAC: 02-000388 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

_____________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e motions for leave to file a brief amicus curiae are GRANTED. The application for leave to a ppeal the October 26, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take ot her peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties sha ll address whether the burden-shifting analysis described in the Court of Appeals opinion in this case relieved the plainti ff of the burden of proving that he was disabled from all jobs within his qualifications and training, as required by Sington v Chrysler Corp , 467 Mich 144 (2002). The partie s shall file supplemental briefs addressing this issue with in 56 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of the arguments ma de in their application papers.

l0410 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 13, 2007

Clerk
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-018 February 2, 2004

NRC SETS SCHEDULE FOR REVIEW OF LES APPLICATION;

OFFERS OPPORTUNITY TO REQUEST PARTICIPATION IN HEARING

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has established a 30-month milestone schedule for

reviewing an application from Louisiana Energy Services (LES) to build a gas centrifuge uranium

enrichment plant in Eunice, New Mexico, to be known as the National Enrichment Facility. The

agency will hold a hearing on the application as part of its review and invites persons whose interest

may be affected by the proceeding to file a written petition for permission to participate in the hearing.

LES is an international consortium of companies in the nuclear industry consisting of two

general partners, Urenco Investments, Inc., and Westinghouse Enrichment Company, and six limited

partners. The NRC has determined that the application, which was submitted on December 15,

contains sufficient information for the agency to begin its detailed review and has formally 

“docketed,” or filed, the application. A copy will be available on the NRC’s Agencywide Document

Access and Management System (ADAMS) using accession number ML040020261 through

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html . A copy is also available at the NRC’s Public

Document Room at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

The Commission believes that it is obligated to make sure that its adjudicatory processes are

conducted in a manner that would achieve sound and timely decisions. Consequently, the Commission

will endeavor to identify efficiencies, and provide the pertinent resources the agency needs to complete

reviews and reach timely decisions in licensing uranium enrichment facilities.

The NRC staff will conduct a comprehensive review of the LES application and prepare a

safety evaluation report and an environmental impact statement before the hearing is completed. The

applicant (LES) and the NRC staff will be parties to the hearing.

Any other person whose interest may be affected and who wishes to participate as a party in the

hearing proceeding must file a petition to intervene within 60 days of publication of publication of the

Commission’s notice and order in the Federal Register, expected shortly. The petition must be filed

with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-

0001, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff, with copies by fax or e-mail and to the NRC

staff and applicant attorney at the addresses listed in the Federal Register notice. The petition must

include the particular interest of the petitioner in the proceeding and how that interest may be affected

by the results of the proceeding; a specification of the contentions, or specific issues, that the petitioner 
-2-

seeks to have litigated in the hearing; and other information as set out in detail in the Federal Register

notice.

###
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2003, of Synagro Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Paul
Withrow, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company and that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



                                               /s/ J. Paul Withrow
                                               -------------------
                                               J. Paul Withrow
                                               August 13, 2003
#### § 1201.133 Judicial review.

An employee, former employee, or applicant for employment who is adversely affected by a final Board decision on a corrective action complaint brought by the Special Counsel may obtain judicial review of the decision as provided by 5 U.S.C. 7703.

[78 FR 39545, July 2, 2013]
EXHIBIT  10.53


                               THIRD AMENDMENT TO
                    POS CHECK THIRD PARTY SERVICER AGREEMENT
                             DATED DECEMBER 12, 2000
                                     BETWEEN
                         ELECTRONIC CLEARING HOUSE, INC.
                                       AND
                                VISA U.S.A., INC.


The  POS  Check Servicer Agreement ("Agreement") dated December 12, 2000 between
the  parties  is  amended  as  follows:

     1.     ECHO  agrees  to  deliver to Visa an enhancement to its current Visa
POS  Check processing system to support the Illinois Retail Merchant Association
(IRMA)  utilizing  the  4Access  Communications  Orion  or Certicheck terminals.

     2.   ECHO agrees to deliver to Visa an enhancement to its current Visa POS
Check processing system to add support for Visa's POS Check Service to the ECHO
TouchNet interface for access to TouchNet's university customers.

     3.   Visa shall pay ECHO the following fees for these additional functions:

     4.   Payment Terms - upon execution of Third Amendment to the Agreement.

     5.   Except as amended herein, the terms and conditions of the Agreement
dated  December  12,  2000, and any subsequent amendments shall continue in full
force  and  effect.

The  parties  through  their authorized representatives have executed this Third
Amendment  on  the  dates  shown  below,  effective  the  latest  such  date.

ELECTRONIC CLEARING                  VISA U.S.A., INC.
HOUSE, INC.


<PAGE>
# Fourth Court of **Appeals**

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 28, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00448

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.L.J.R. ET. AL, CHILDREN

, Appellant

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017PA01227 Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presidi ng



### ORDER

On August 30, 2018, we granted appellant’s motion to refer this appeal to alternative dispute resolution and stay the appeal pending settlement negotiations. On September 24, 2018, appellant filed a status report informing the court that the parties failed to reach a settlement. We therefore ORDER the appellant’s brief to be filed no later than t wenty days from the date of this

order.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of September, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-38 November 6, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC, UNION ELECTRIC TO MEET FOR REGULATORY CONFERENCE

ON CALLAWAY INSPECTION FINDINGS

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of Union Electric Co.,

which operates the Callaway Nuclear Plant near Fulton, Missouri, for a regulatory conference to

discuss findings in a recent inspection of the plant’s ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable)

program for limiting the radiation dose of plant workers.

The conference will begin at 1 p.m. on Thursday, November 9, at NRC’s Region IV office in

Arlington, Texas. The public is invited to observe the meeting, but participation will be limited to the

NRC and Union Electric. NRC officials will be available to answer questions afterward.

The NRC has characterized the inspection findings to be discussed as potentially “white”

findings. Under the NRC’s new reactor oversight process, inspection findings are evaluated under a

significance determination process and assigned a color that indicates safety significance. Findings

with very low safety significance are labeled “green.” “White” findings have low to moderate

importance to safety and may require additional NRC inspection. Progressively more serious findings

are labeled “yellow” and “red,” and receive commensurately greater oversight. A more detailed

explanation of the NRC’s new reactor oversight process can be found on the NRC’s website at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ROP/description.html.

In an August 7-11 inspection at Callaway, NRC inspectors identified multiple examples in

which the radiation doses to workers exceeded pre-job estimates by more than 50% and involved

substantial job doses. No workers exceeded their quarterly or annual dose limits. However, the

findings may indicate a continuing problem with radiation dose control.

As part of the reactor oversight process, a regulatory conference is being held to provide

Callaway officials an opportunity to present information to the NRC that will help it to reach a final

determination of the significance of the inspection findings. In addition to determining the significance

of the findings, the NRC may also find that a violation of NRC requirements occurred requiring

corrective action by the plant’s managers.

###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-03-073 December 5, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC APPOINTS NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT THE SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have selected Frederick

W. Jaxheimer as the new resident inspector at the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station in

Berwick, Pa. The two-unit site is operated by PPL.

Mr. Jaxheimer joins Senior Resident Inspector Samuel Hansell and Resident Inspector

John Richmond at the two-unit site. Resident inspectors may be assigned to a site for up to

seven years. 

Mr. Jaxheimer joined the NRC in June 2001 as an inspector in the Region I Division of

Reactor Safety. He has 16 years of experience in the nuclear industry, including various

engineering positions at the Three Mile Island Generating Station in Middletown, Pa., and at

GPU Nuclear in Parsippany, N.J. 

Mr. Jaxheimer earned a bachelor’s degree in nuclear engineering from the Pennsylvania

State University. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve

as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work

projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. 

The Susquehanna resident inspectors can be reached at 570/542-2134.

###
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Electromagnetic Compatibility Testing for Conducted Susceptibility Along Interconnecting Signal Lines (NUREG/CR-5609,ORNL/TM-13705)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-5609 (PDF - 1.21 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**May 2003**Date Published:**August 2003

**Prepared by:** Paul D. Ewing, Richard T. Wood, Kofi Korsah, Ayman A. Shourbaji, Thomas L. Wilson, and Boyd M. Beets

Oak Ridge National Laboratory P.O. Box 2008, MS-6006 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6006 Managed by UT-Battelle, LLC

C.E. Antonescu, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6272 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This document presents recommendations and the associated technical basis for addressing the effects of conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI) and radio-frequency interference (RFI) along interconnecting signal lines in safety-related instrumentation and control (I&C) systems. Oak Ridge National Laboratory has been engaged in assisting the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, in developing the technical basis for regulatory guidance on EMI/RFI immunity and power surge withstand capability (SWC). Previous research efforts have provided recommendations on (1) electromagnetic compatibility design and installation practices, (2) the endorsement of EMI/RFI and SWC test criteria and test methods, (3) the determination of ambient electromagnetic conditions at nuclear power plants, and (4) the development of recommended electromagnetic operating envelopes applicable to locations where safety-related I&C systems will be installed. The current research focuses on the susceptibility of I&C systems to conducted EMI/RFI along interconnecting signal lines. Coverage of signal line susceptibility was identified as an open issue in previous research on establishing the technical basis for EMI/RFI and SWC in safety-related I&C systems. Research results provided in this report will be used to establish the technical basis for endorsing U.S. Department of Defense and European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization test criteria and test methods that address signal-line susceptibility. In addition, recommendations on operating envelopes are presented based on available technical information.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
§ 185.129 Computation of time. ( a ) In computing any period of time under this part or in an order issued thereunder, the time begins with the day following the act, event, or default, and includes the last day of the period, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday observed by the Federal Government, in which event it includes the next business day.
( b ) When the period of time allowed is less than 7 days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays observed by the Federal Government shall be excluded from the computation.
( c ) Where a document has been served or issued by placing it in the mail, an additional 5 days will be added to the time permitted for any response.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-011 March 2, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC CHAIRMAN TO HOLD NEWS BRIEFING FOLLOWING VISIT TO INDIAN POINT 2

Dr. Richard Meserve, chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, will visit the Indian

Point 2 nuclear power plant on Friday, March 9. He will tour the plant and meet with managers and

staff at the Buchanan, N.Y., facility, which is operated by Consolidated Edison Company of New

York.

At 1 p.m. in the Indian Point Energy Education Center at the plant, Chairman Meserve will

meet with interested news media representatives to discuss his visit and answer any questions reporters

may have about NRC oversight of the plant. The center is located at the plant, at Broadway and

Bleakley Avenue.

Dr. Meserve was sworn in as chairman of the NRC on October 29, 1999. Prior to that, he was a

partner in the Washington, D.C., law firm of Covington & Burling, having joined the firm in 1981.

From 1977 to 1981, he served on the White House staff as legal counsel to the President’s Science and

Technology Advisor. He has also served as chairman or a member of several National Academy of

Sciences committees.

For a more detailed version of Dr. Meserve’s biography, visit the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/WHATIS/meserve.vitae.html

###
<PAGE>   1
 
EXHIBIT 21. SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 JURISDICTION
                                                                      OF
                     NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                          ORGANIZATION
                     ------------------                          ------------
<S>                                                             <C>
APS Express, Inc............................................          Maryland
Bender Direct Mail Service, Inc.............................          Delaware
Compass Mail Services Holding Corporation...................          Delaware
Compass Mail Services, Inc..................................          Delaware
Compass Mail Services, L.P..................................          Delaware
Compass Print & Mail Services, Inc..........................          Delaware
Compass Print Services Holding Corporation..................          Delaware
Compass Print Services, L.P.................................          Delaware
Compass Receivables Management Corporation..................          Delaware
Compass Receivables Management Holding Corporation..........          Delaware
Compass Receivables Management, L.P.........................          Delaware
Compass Teleservices, Inc...................................        New Jersey
Creditsafe Limited..........................................    United Kingdom
Delivery Verification Service, Inc..........................          Delaware
The Mail Box, Inc...........................................             Texas
MB Strategic Services, Ltd..................................             Texas
MetroWebb, Inc..............................................          Delaware
Mid-Continent Agencies of New York, Inc.....................          New York
MWI Laser Group, Inc........................................          Delaware
National Credit Management Corporation......................          Maryland
Nationwide Debt Recovery, Inc...............................          Delaware
Professional American Collections, Inc......................          Illinois
Total Early Receivables Management Corporation..............          Maryland
</TABLE>
§ 1201.171 Referral of case to Special Panel. If the Board reaffirms its decision under § 1201.162(a)(2) of this part with or without modification, it will certify the matter immediately to a Special Panel established under 5 U.S.C. 7702(d). Upon certification, the Board, within 5 days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays), will transmit the administrative record in the proceeding to the Chairman of the Special Panel and to the Commission. That record will include the following: ( a ) The factual record compiled under this section, which will include a transcript of any hearing;
( b ) The decisions issued by the Board and the Commission under 5 U.S.C. 7702; and
( c ) A transcript of oral arguments made, or legal briefs filed, before the Board or the Commission.
#### § 1639.12 Deposit of funds collected.

All funds owed to the Board and collected under this part will be deposited in the Thrift Savings Fund. Funds owed to other agencies and collected under this part will be credited to the account designated by the creditor agency for the receipt of the funds.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Energy Homes, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 4, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 /s/ Keith O. Holdbrooks
------------------------
Keith O. Holdbrooks
Chief Executive Officer
August 15, 2003

/s/ James L. Stariha
--------------------
James L. Stariha
Chief Financial Officer
August 15, 2003



This certification accompanies this Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and is not filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as
a separate disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 181

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 181 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93026, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 181.49 Retention of records.

All records required to be kept by the exporter, importer, manufacturer or producer under this subpart with respect to manufacturing drawback claims, and all records kept by others which complement the records of the importer, exporter, manufacturer or producer (see § 190.15 (see also §§ 190.26(f), 190.38, 190.175(c)) or § 191.15 (see also §§ 190.26(f), 191.38, 191.175(c)) of this chapter, as appropriate) shall be retained for at least three years after payment of such claims. However, any person who issues a drawback certificate that enables another person to make or perfect a drawback claim shall keep records in support of that certificate commencing on the date that the certificate is issued and shall retain those records for three years following the date of payment of the claim.

[T.D. 95-68, 60 FR 46364, Sept. 6, 1995, as amended by T.D. 98-16, 63 FR 11006, Mar. 5, 1998; USCBP-2018-0029, 83 FR 64996, Dec. 18, 2018]