alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1501.11 Consideration of complete file before hearing. ( a ) Following delivery to the applicant or employee of the interrogatory and after expiration of the time limit for filing an answer to the interrogatory, the Board shall proceed to consider the case on the complete file, including the answer, if any, to the interrogatory.
( b ) If, upon such consideration, the Board concludes that a finding favorable to the individual may be made, no hearing shall be required.
( c ) If, upon such consideration, the Board concludes that a determination favorable to the individual cannot be made on the basis of the information in the file, it shall set a time and place for a hearing and shall give notice thereof to the individual.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


                                                    Exhibit 27.1


                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS






To the Board of Directors
PSB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries

     We consent to the inclusion herein of our report dated
March 17, 2000, which is as of December 31, 1999, relating to
the balance sheets of PSB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997 and the related statements of
operations, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1999, which report appears in the December 31, 1999 Form 10-
KSB/A of PSB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries.  We also consent to
the reference included herein to our firm under the heading
"Experts."

                              Stockton Bates, LLP

                              Certified Public Accountants


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
April 17, 2000



</TABLE>
#### § 213.6 Information concerning assistance.

Any person may contact the Office with questions regarding eligibility for technical assistance. Summaries of the trade laws and the SBA size standards can be obtained by writing to the Trade Remedy Assistance Office, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Information is also provided on the Commission's Web site at *http://www.usitc.gov.*

[80 FR 39380, July 9, 2015]
#### Miniard v. Jones.

Oct. 9, 1945.

*545Isaac Turner for appellant.

M. 0. Begley for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Cammack

Affirming.

Felix Jones won the Republican nomination for tax commissioner in Leslie County. His total vote was 932. P. C. Miniard received 910 votes and Decorsey Begley received 751. Miniard filed this contest charging that Jones violated the Corrupt Practices Act, KRS, 123.010 et seq., by promising the people he would visit them for the purpose of taking their assessments. His cards carried the following statement: “If nominated and elected I promise to visit each home and get their list.”

In appealing from a ruling in favor of Jones, Miniard insists that Jones promised something of value to the voters of Leslie County. He contends also-that, since the tax commissioner is required by KRS 132.410 to keep his office open from the first of July until the board of supervisors adjourns the following year, assessments should be made at the county seat.- The only mandatory provision is that the office be kept open during a certain period. The tax commissioner may name deputies under KRS 132.390. If Jones is elected tax commissioner, he could leave his office in charge of a deputy and go ahead with his personal visits. This would be an added burden on him, but there is no mandatory provision as to where assessments shall be made. Jones’ promise was not to any special group or class of persons, but to all of the citizens of Leslie County. As pointed out in Owsley v. Hill, 210 Ky. 285, 275 S. W. 797, such a promise does not run afoul of the Corrupt Practices Act.

Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gary W.  Jones,  the Chief  Executive  Officer  of  eMagin  Corporation  (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  (15  U.S.C.  78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to eMagin  Corporation  and will be retained by eMagin  Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: November 2, 2005

/s/ Gary W. Jones
----------------
Name: Gary W. Jones
Title: Chief Executive Officer
§ 146.24 Transfer of merchandise from a zone. ( a ) *Accountability.* ( 1 ) All zone status merchandise transferred from a zone will be accurately recorded within the inventory control and recordkeeping system.
( 2 ) The inventory control and recordkeeping system for merchandise transfers must have the capability to trace all transfers back to a zone admission under a Customs authorized inventory method.
( b ) *Information.* The inventory control and recordkeeping system must be capable of providing all information necessary to make entry for transfer of merchandise from the zone.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-04-040 September 28, 2004

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC NAMES JOHN HANNA SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT FORT CALHOUN NUCLEAR PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has assigned John Hanna as senior resident

inspector at Fort Calhoun Station, a nuclear power plant near Fort Calhoun, Neb. He joins

Leonard Willoughby, the resident inspector at the plant.

“John Hannah’s extensive experience and commitment to safety will aid the NRC in

oversight of the licensee as part of our assurance that Fort Calhoun Station operates in a manner

so as to protect public health and safety,” said NRC Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallett.

Hanna graduated from the Georgia Institute of Technology with a bachelor of science

degree in engineering in 1990. Following graduation he worked for the U.S. Navy as a shift test

engineer at the Norfolk Naval Shipyard.

In 1997, Hanna joined the NRC at the Region IV office in Arlington, Texas, as a reactor

engineer. He has served as resident inspector at the Callaway nuclear plant, near Fulton, Mo.,

and at Arkansas Nuclear One, near Russelville, Ark. He has also served as acting senior resident

inspector at River Bend Station, in St. Francisville, La., and at Turkey Point Nuclear Plant, near

Miami, Fla.

Each of the country’s commercial nuclear plants has resident inspectors who serve as the

agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring significant work

projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. The resident inspectors at Fort

Calhoun can be reached at (402) 426-9611.

###
#### § 10400.20 Purpose and scope.

This subpart implements the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, a Federal law that requires Federal agencies to protect private information about individuals that the agencies collect or maintain. It establishes IPEC's rules for access to records in systems of records we maintain that are retrieved by an individual's name or another personal identifier. It describes the procedures by which individuals may request access to records, request amendment or correction of those records, and request an accounting of disclosures of those records by IPEC. Whenever it is appropriate to do so, IPEC automatically processes a Privacy Act request for access to records under both the Privacy Act and the FOIA, following the rules contained in this part. IPEC processes a request under both the Privacy Act and the FOIA so you will receive the maximum amount of information available to you by law.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-cv-81275-DMM

NELSON FERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff, 

-vsDIAMONDS BY RAYMOND LEE, LLC, a

Florida limited liability company. 

Defendants. 

_________________________________________________/

MEDIATION DISPOSITION REPORT

A Mediation conference was conducted on ___January 14, 2021__. The conference resulted in the 

following:

The following attorneys, parties, corporate representatives, and/or claims professionals 

attended and participated in the mediation conference:

__X__ All Plaintiffs and the respective trial counsel.

__X__ All Defendants and/or their claims representatives, and their respective trial 

counsel.

The following individuals, parties, corporate representatives and/or claims professionals 

failed to appear and/or participate as ordered:

__X__ The case was completely settled. Counsel shall submit a stipulation for dismissal 

or other final disposition.

_____The parties reached an impasse as to all issues.

_____The parties settled the following issues:

(a) ________________________________

(b) ________________________________

The issues remaining to be adjudicated are:

(c) ________________________________

(d) ________________________________

_____ The case was set for trial on ______ and should be removed from 

the trial docket.

_____ These proceedings have been adjourned.

Case 9:20-cv-81275-DMM Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/15/2021 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO.: 20-cv-81275-DMM

Mediation Disposition Report

2

_____ The scheduled mediation proceedings herein have been canceled 

as the parties have announced a settlement.

The Court is further advised the parties have agreed as follows:

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished via E-Service 

and U.S. Mail this 15th day of January, 2021, to: See Service List.

KRINZMAN, HUSS, LUBETSKY

FELDMAN & HOTTE

110 S.E. 6th Street, Suite 1430

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Telephone: (954) 761-3454

Facsimile: (954) 761-3484

E-Mail: jjh@khllaw.com

E-Service: eservicefll@khllaw.com

By: _/s/ Joseph J. Huss ___

JOSEPH J. HUSS

Certified Court Mediator

 Fla. Bar No. 0328480

SERVICE LIST

Roderick V. Hannah, Esq.

4800 N. Hiatus Road,

Sunrise, Florida 33351

E-Service: Rhannah@rhannahlaw.com

Pelayo M. Duran, Esq.

4640 N.W. 7th Street,

Miami, Florida 33126

E-Service: Pduran@pelayoduran.com

Kenneth L. Minerely, Esq.

Meghan Miller, Esq.

1200 North Federal Highway, Suite 420,

Boca Raton, Florida 33432

E-Service: Ken@minerleyfein.com

Meghan@minerleyfein.com

fileclerk@minerleyfein.com

litigation@minerleyfein.com

Case 9:20-cv-81275-DMM Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/15/2021 Page 2 of 2
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 559 

To amend the Grand Ronde Reservation Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 3, 2021 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Grand Ronde Reservation Act, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GRAND RONDE RESERVATION ACT AMEND4 MENT. 

5 Section 1(d) of Public Law 100–425 (commonly 

6 known as the ‘‘Grand Ronde Reservation Act’’) (102 Stat. 

7 1594) is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘lands within 

9 the State of Oregon’’ and inserting ‘‘the 84 acres 

10 known as the Thompson Strip’’; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 559 IS

1 (2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para2 graph (3); and 

3 (3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(2) GAMING PROHIBITION.—Any real property 

6 obtained by the Tribes as part of a land claim settle7 ment approved by the United States shall not be eli8 gible, or used, for any class II gaming or class III 

9 gaming under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act 

10 (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) (as those terms are defined 

11 in section 4 of that Act (25 U.S.C. 2703)).’’. 

12 SEC. 2. TREATY RIGHTS OF FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED 

13 TRIBES. 

14 Nothing in this Act, or an amendment made by this 

15 Act, shall be construed to enlarge, confirm, adjudicate, af16 fect, or modify any treaty right of an Indian Tribe (as 

17 defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and 

18 Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304)). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov 

No. III-03-075 December 11, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO DISCUSS SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE OF

PUMP PROBLEM AT PERRY NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of First Energy

Nuclear Operating Company on December 17 in Lisle, Illinois, to discuss the safety significance of the

failure of a pump which supplies cooling water to safety components at the Perry Nuclear Power Plant. 

The plant is located in Perry, Ohio.

The pump failed while it was running on September 1. It was subsequently repaired and

returned to service on September 5. The pump problem occurred because the utility had failed to have

adequate procedures when the pump was reassembled in 1997. Improper reassembly led to increased

stress that resulted in damage of an internal component of the pump. The pump is one of three in the

emergency service water system which provides cooling water to several plant safety systems.

The NRC staff has completed a preliminary assessment of the incident and concluded that it

had a “low to moderate safety significance.” The meeting, called a Regulatory Conference, will allow

the utility to provide the NRC with any new information pertaining to the event and to present its view

of the event’s safety significance. 

The meeting will be held at 2 p.m. (CST) in the NRC’s Region III Office, 801 Warrenville

Road, Lisle. Visitors should report first to the Second Floor reception area. The meeting is open to

public observation; before the meeting is adjourned, members of the public may ask questions of the

NRC staff and provide comments.

NRC inspection findings are evaluated using a four-level scale of safety significance, ranging

from “green” for a finding of minor significance, through “white” and “yellow” to “red,” for a finding

of high safety significance.

The NRC’s preliminary evaluation determined the pump problem to be a “white” finding, one

of low to moderate safety significance. “White” inspection findings can lead to additional NRC

inspections.

Information presented by the utility in the Regulatory Conference will be used by the NRC

staff, along with its inspection findings, to determine the final safety significance of the problem. The

final determination of the safety significance will be posted on the NRC’s web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/regulatory/enforcement/current.html#reactor
- 2 -

The inspection findings are detailed in Inspection Report 2003-006, which can be viewed

online at the NRC’s electronic reading room by entering the accession number ML033040217: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html. 

###
470 P.2d 309

#### PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Petitioner, v. Honorable Caswell S. NEAL, Judge of the District Court of Eddy County, New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 9066.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

June 8, 1970.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and TACKETT, WATSON, SISK and Mc-KENNA, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that petition for writ of prohibition be and the same is hereby denied.
### §73. Presentation of claims

All claims under section 72 of this title must be presented to the register of the proper land district within sixty days after the date of actual possession and the commencement of improvements on the land, by the filing of a declaratory statement therefor; but when the township plat is not on file at the date of such improvement, filing must be made within sixty days from the receipt of such plat at the district office.

(R.S. §2349.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2349 derived from act Mar. 3, 1873, ch. 279, §3, 17 Stat. 607.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Office of register of district land office abolished and all functions of register transferred to Secretary of the Interior, or to officers and agencies of Department of the Interior as Secretary may designate, by Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

See also note set out under section 1 of this title.

#### Indian Lands Excepted

See note set out under section 71 of this title.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 09, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 09, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22I0066. H.J. RUSSELL & COMPANY et al. v. MARQUITTA JORDAN et al.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

19EV004507
July 31, 2015 Jones Production 8747 Centerport Rd. Weedsport NY 13166

Sirs, As a professional videographer and an owner of small video UAS, a Hubsan x4. I consider the UAS to be one more camera in my arsenal and look forward to investing in larger units with better video capabilities. I’m also looking forward to the untold uses for UAS’ large and small in the photography and video business. I am petitioning the FAA for exemption from title 14 Code of Regulations in general as the UAS does not qualify as a “civil aircraft”. I feel a new “policy “ should be developed specific to the individual uses of quadcopter as it relates to an established business. As with any tool or piece of equipment necessary for a business to prosper it should be the responsibility of the company for maintenance and operation. With proper insurance ( specific to UAS), a 200’ height limit , remaining in sight and an able operator an established business should be granted an exemption. This exemption would put the UAS in the hands of responsible operators with public safety and private satisfaction in mind. Summary: the UAS should not be subject to “civil aircraft” regulations. title 14 Code of Regulations should not apply to unmanned aircraft that operate for hire. There should be a new policy specifically for unmanned aircraft.

thank-you, Michael W Jones mjones165@twcny.rr.com 3157765790
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that thi s opinion should not * be publishe d an d is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 60493 Su m m ar y Cal endar
P RE NT I S S I
. GUY T ON P l a i n tiff-A p p ell a n t v. M AD I SO N CO U N TY , M I SSI SSI PPI ; KAR L M
. BA N K S D efen da n t s- A pp el l ees

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt fo rth e S o u th e r n D is tr ic t o f M is s is s ip p i U SD C N o. 3: 08- C V
- 294
B ef ore R E AV L E Y , JO L L Y , an d O W E N , C i rcui tJu dg es . P E R C U R IA M: * P renti ss I. G u yton a p p eal s f rom t h e di st ri ctcourt ’ s grant of sum m ary ju d g m e n t in h is s u it a lle g in gco n s tr u c tiv e d is c h a r g e . F o rth e re a s o n s g iv e n in th e d is tr ic t c o u r t’s m e m o r a n d u m o p in io n a n do r d e r , th e ju d g m e n t is AF F I RMED. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Janua ry 11, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk Case: 09-60493 Document: 00511000591 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         102,837
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  247,832
<ALLOWANCES>                                    48,000
<INVENTORY>                                     94,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               660,075
<PP&E>                                         262,701
<DEPRECIATION>                                 147,881
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,724,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          409,082
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,332
<OTHER-SE>                                     755,483
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,724,800
<SALES>                                      1,233,137
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,233,137
<CGS>                                          412,639
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  979,015
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,723
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,012
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (193,252)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   162,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (355,252)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (355,252)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)
        

</TABLE>