alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-99-17 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Friday, April 2 1999)

NRC FINDS PERFORMANCE ‘ACCEPTABLE’

IN LATEST REVIEW OF SEQUOYAH

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found that safety performance remains

acceptable in the NRC’s latest plant performance review at the Sequoyah nuclear power plant,

operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority near

Soddy-Daisy, Tennessee.

In a letter to TVA outlining the results of the review, NRC official Paul E. Fredrickson said

overall performance at Sequoyah remained acceptable. He said both units “operated at high

capacity factors,” noted that Unit 2 completed a successful refueling outage, and said

“management involvement in operations continued to be effective in resolving emergent issues.”

Fredrickson said performance challenges during the evaluation period, which ran from

February 1998 through January 1999, were in the areas of licensed operator training and

performance; corrective and preventive maintenance on certain electrical breakers; and in the

identification, evaluation and resolution of some adverse conditions.

He said that, in addition to the NRC’s normal inspection program, two additional Sequoyah

inspections will be conducted at the initiative of the Atlanta regional office. One will place emphasis

on breaker program maintenance and post maintenance testing following refurbishment. The other

will focus on the material condition of the plant’s ice condensers. He said some increased

emphasis will also be placed on the licensed operator training program and its implementation and

on implementation of problem evaluation reports into the plant’s corrective action program.

The text of the plant performance review letter is available from the NRC Region II Office

of Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr.

NRC reviews safety performance twice a year at every licensed nuclear power plant in the

nation. These reviews give the agency staff an integrated assessment of plant performance and

provide a basis for planning inspection activities.

Plant performance reviews are being used as an interim measure to monitor nuclear power

plant safety. The agency began using it for this purpose after suspending the Systematic

Assessment of License Performance (SALP) process until a new assessment program is

developed. Sequoyah has been selected as one of eight pilot plants to be used by the NRC in this

process. Previously, SALP reports were issued every 12 to 24 months. .

The new reactor oversight and assessment program being developed will provide quarterly
performance reports, based on a number of performance indicators and on inspection findings.

This program will be tested at eight sites beginning in June and will be extended to all plants next

January. A full description of the new program is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

#
(April 25, 1949.)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Farnsworth, Appellant.

Present

— Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ.
§ 201.31 Fees and employee conduct. ( a ) The Commission shall not charge any fee for the cost of searching for and reviewing an individual's records.
( b ) Reproduction, duplication or copying of records by the Commission shall be at the rate of $0.10 per page. There shall be no charge, however, when the total amount does not exceed $25.00.
( c ) The Privacy Act Officer shall establish rules of conduct for persons involved in the design, development, operation, or maintenance of any system of records, or in maintaining any record, and periodically instruct each such person with respect to such rules and the requirements of the Privacy Act including the penalties for noncompliance.
[63 FR 29348, May 29, 1998, as amended at 68 FR 32975, June 3, 2003]
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of CFO

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Gateway, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Gateway), does hereby certify that:



a) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the Form 10-Q) of Gateway fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



b) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Gateway.



Dated: May 10, 2005



By:

/s/    RODERICK M. SHERWOOD
IIIRoderick M. Sherwood III Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Multimedia
Games, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig S. Nouis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, that, based on my knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Craig S. Nouis



Craig S. Nouis

Chief Financial Officer

February 14, 2003



-33-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3633] 

                    In accordance with a notice received from the Department of Homeland                           ( print page 62497)                        Security—Federal Emergency Management Agency—effective September 29, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to include Mingo and Wayne Counties as disaster areas due to damages caused by severe storms, flooding and landslides occurring on September 16, 2004, and continuing through September 27, 2004.                 

In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small businesses located in the contiguous counties of McDowell and Wyoming in the State of West Virginia; Boyd, Lawrence, Martin, and Pike in the Commonwealth of Kentucky; and Buchanan County in the Commonwealth of Virginia may be filed until the specified date at the previously designated location. All other counties contiguous to the above named primary counties have previously been declared. 

The economic injury number assigned to Kentucky is 9AG900. 

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.*, the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is November 19, 2004, and for economic injury the deadline is June 20, 2005.                 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008). 

Dated: October 20, 2004. 

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 04-23960 Filed 10-25-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
### §3715. Buying real property of a debtor

The head of an agency for whom a civil action is brought against a debtor of the United States Government may buy real property of the debtor at a sale on execution of the real property of the debtor resulting from the action. The head of the agency may not bid more for the property than the amount of the judgment for which the property is being sold, and costs. The marshal of the district in which the sale is held shall transfer the property to the Government.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 972.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3715 | 31:195. | R.S. §3470; June 2, 1965, Pub. L. 89–30, §5, 79 Stat. 119. |

The words "by such agent as . . . shall appoint" are omitted as unnecessary. The word "agency" is substituted for "department or independent agency" because of the restatement. The words "for whom a civil action is brought" are substituted for "at whose instance suit was instituted" for consistency. The words "real property" are substituted for "lands or tenements" for clarity and consistency. The words "in behalf of the United States" are omitted as surplus. The words "for the property" are added for clarity. The word "property" is substituted for "such estate" for consistency in the section. The words "Whenever such purchase is made" are omitted as surplus. The words "transfer the property" are substituted for "make all needful conveyances, assignments, or transfers" to eliminate unnecessary words and for clarity.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,145
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                       101
<INVENTORY>                                      2,314
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,043
<PP&E>                                          10,579
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,413
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,201
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            54
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,988
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,879
<SALES>                                          4,330
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,288
<CGS>                                            2,188
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,937
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  81
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,495
<INCOME-TAX>                                       948
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,547
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.3
                                 PROMISSORY NOTE



$2,500.00                                                   Las Vegas, Nevada
                                                            February 20, 2001


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Twin Lakes, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Maker"),
promises to pay to the order of Estancia LLC (hereinafter referred to as
"Holder"), 18 Highland Creek, Henderson, Nevada 89052, or at such other address
as Holder may designate in writing, the principal sum of Two Thousand Five
Hundred Dollars ($2,500) until paid, at the rate of six percent (6%) per annum.

The principal amount of the note shall be due and payable on or before 12/31/02.

Should the amount owing on this note not be paid when due, the entire unpaid
principal sum evidenced by this Note will, without notice to the Maker, become
due and payable.

Maker hereby waives presentment of payment, protect and demand, notice of
protest, demand and dishonor and nonpayment of this Note, and consents that the
holder may extend the time of payment or otherwise modify the terms of payment
or any part or whole of the indebtedness evidenced by this Note as the request
of any other person liable hereon, and consent shall not alter nor diminish the
liability of any party hereunder.

Maker may repay the indebtedness evidenced hereby in whole or in part from time
to time without premium or penalty.

As used herein, Holder shall include any subsequent holder of this Note. Maker
shall have no right to assign this Note without the consent of Holder, and in no
event shall any assignment of this Note by Maker act to release Maker from any
obligations hereunder unless such release is evidenced in writing by Holder.

This Note shall be governed by the laws of the State of Nevada.

Witness the hand of the undersigned this 20th day of February 2001.

                                             Twin Lakes, Inc.

                                             By: /s/ Johnny Thomas
                                             ------------------------------
                                                 Johnny Thomas, President
## Martin, Michael (OST) To: 

### Cc: Subject: Jason Milewski Omilewski@prautes.com) Dave Hackett (dhackett@gosunair.com) EssentialAir Service atVictoria r~


## -;:~-:- u Everyone: Iwould like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS)situation atVictoria and give you an opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we submit arecommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. We issued Order 2014-3-6 (March 11, 2014), requesting proposals from airlines interested in providing EASfor a new term. In response to our request, SunAir (the incumbent) and Boutique Air submitted proposals. I have attached both airlines' proposals for your review and Iexpect it to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov sometime this afternoon. Irequest that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have assoon as possible, but no later than Monday, May 5. Please send your comments directly to mevia e-mail at michael,f.martin@dot.gov. Also, please forward this e-mail to all relevant parties that I have not included on this distribution list Ifyou have any questions, feel free to contact me.
Michael Martin United States Department of Transportation Essential Air Service (EAS)and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP) (202) 366-6494

1
§ 1620.23 Spousal rights. ( a ) The current spouse of a justice or judge of the United States (as defined in 28 U.S.C. 451), or of a Court of Veterans Appeals judge, possesses the rights described at 5 U.S.C. 8351(b)(5).
( b ) A current or former spouse of a bankruptcy judge, a United States magistrate judge, or a judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims, possesses the rights described at 5 U.S.C. 8435 and 8467 if the judge is covered under this subpart.
[64 FR 31057, June 9, 1999, as amended at 70 FR 32213, June 1, 2005]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-053 August 23, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC CITES EXELON NUCLEAR GENERATION COMPANY 

FOR VIOLATION OF LOW TO MODERATE RISK SIGNIFICANCE AT PEACH BOTTOM

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has determined that a violation of NRC regulations

at Exelon Generation Companyís Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, in Delta, Pa., should be

characterized as ìwhite,î meaning that it is an issue of low to moderate importance to safety but one

which may require additional NRC inspections. 

The violation concerned several occasions when the public address (PA) and evacuation alarm

(EA) system was not maintained or did not function properly in accordance with the plantís emergency

plan and implementing procedures. The issue has low to moderate safety significance because a failed

or degraded emergency onsite communication system would prevent the license from properly

informing and alerting onsite personnel of protective actions and could unnecessarily delay a site

evacuation. 

Under the significance determination process, NRC officials classify certain conditions at

nuclear power plants as being one of four colors which delineate increasing levels of severity,

beginning with green and progressing in severity to white, yellow or red. 

A preliminary ìwhiteî finding was described in an inspection report dated August 3 of this

year. The letter transmitting the report provided the company with an opportunity to either request a

regulatory conference to discuss this issue or to respond in writing. Exelon sent a written response,

indicating the company did not contest the characterization of the risk significance of this finding. 

In a letter transmitting the final significance determination and notice of violation, Region I

Administrator Hubert J. Miller said, ìThis problem with the PA and EA system addressed in this letter

is just one of a number of Emergency Preparedness (EP) related problems that have surfaced in the

past several months.î He said the company has informed him that it has ìinitiated actions to resolve

these problems and strengthen EP performance in the Exelon MidAtlantic regional operating group.î

Because this violation falls into the regulatory response band of the NRCís oversight process,

Peach Bottom may be subject to increased NRC oversight such as additional meetings or inspections. 

The agency will determine the most appropriate response and notify Exelon once that determination

has been made. 

###
#### § 132.16 [Reserved]
#### § 201.39 General Counsel's certification of Commission action in closing a meeting or a series of meetings.

Before a Commission meeting may be closed for the specific reasons enumerated in paragraphs (b) (1) through (9) of § 201.36, the General Counsel (i) Shall, in the related public notice, certify that in his or her opinion the meeting may be closed to the public and (ii) Shall state each applicable exemptive provision of paragraphs (b) (1) through (9) of § 201.36.
AERSCREEN Update

11th Modeling Conference

Research Triangle Park, NC

August 12, 2015

James Thurman

U.S. EPA/OAQPS/AQAD/AQMG

8/12/2015 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1
Status of AERSCREEN

• 2005 Guideline preamble

– Screening version of AERMOD being developed (AERSCREEN) and 

meantime SCREEN3 could be used until AERSCREEN available

• 2011: AERSCREEN and MAKEMET released

• April 11, 2011 memorandum: AERSCREEN is EPA’s 

recommended screening model

– Based on AERMOD – state of the science

– Single source only

• Proposed 2015 Guideline: 

– Incorporate AERSCREEN into Guideline as the screening model for 

AERMOD

– May be applicable in all types of terrain and building downwash applications

– AERSCREEN discussed in Section 4.2.1.1 of proposed Guideline

8/12/2015 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2
AERSCREEN 15181

• Incorporated inversion break-up fumigation and 

coastal fumigation from SCREEN3

– Uses AERMOD equations for σy and σz estimates

– See AERSCREEN User’s Guide for full details

• http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/models/screen/aerscreen_userguide.pdf

• Made code more portable across OS

– Eliminated system calls to copy and delete files when 

possible

• Added debug option to output PROBE, 

FLOWSECTOR and fumigation estimates

• Bug fixes

8/12/2015 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 3
MAKEMET 15181

• Incorporated ability to adjust surface friction 

velocity, u*, based on AERMET adjustment 

algorithms

• U* adjustment currently not done when 

calling MAKEMET from AERSCREEN

• U* adjustment can be done running 

MAKEMET outside of AERSCREEN

8/12/2015 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 4
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-02-0176 -  Proposed Rulemaking to Add New Section 10 CFR 50.69, "Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems, and Components" (WITS199900061)

Accession Number: ML022630164

Date Released: Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML022630007 - SECY-02-0176 -  Proposed Rulemaking to Add New Section 10 CFR 50.69, "Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems, and Components" (WITS 199900061) (9 page(s), 9/30/2002)
    - ML022630018 - SECY-02-0176 - Attachment 1 - Federal Register Notice - Proposed Rule: "Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems, and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors" (141 page(s), 9/30/2002)
    - ML022630028 - SECY-02-0176-Attachment 2-Regulatory Analysis for Proposed Rulemaking Section 50.69 (16 page(s), 9/30/2002)
    - ML022630050 - SECY-02-0176-Attachment 3-Environmental Assessment for Proposed Rulemaking Section 50.69 (10 page(s), 9/30/2002)
    - ML022630030 - SECY-02-0176-Attachment 4-Disposition of ANPR Comments for Proposed Rulemaking Section 50.69 (33 page(s), 9/30/2002)
    - ML022630041 - SECY-02-0176-Attachment 5-Draft Regulatory Guide, DG-1121 for Proposed Rulemaking Section 50.69 (15 page(s), 9/1/2002)
    - ML021910534 - Letter Forwarding Draft Revision C to NEI 00-004, 10 CFR 50.69 SSC Categorization Guideline. (74 page(s), 6/28/2002)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
<Page>

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective
Amendment No. 21 to the registration statement on Form S-6 (No. 33-28551) of our
report dated February 15, 2002, relating to the financial statements of Fortis
Benefits Insurance Company, which appears in the Prospectus constituting part of
Post-Effective Amendment No. 19 to such registration statement. We also consent
to the incorporation by reference of our report dated April 6, 2001, relating to
the financial statements of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account
C, which appears in such Prospectus. We also consent to the reference to us
under the heading "Independent Public Accountants" in such Prospectus.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 21, 2003
#### § 1620.33 [Reserved]