alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1598

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities 

Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in projects 

within the San Diego Creek Watershed, California, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2003

Mr. COX introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Resources 

A BILL

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in projects within the San 

Diego Creek Watershed, California, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Irvine Basin Surface 

5 and Groundwater Improvement Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 1598 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and 

3 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102–

4 575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et. seq.) is amended by 

5 inserting after section 1635 the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 1636. IRVINE BASIN GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE 

7 WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. 

8 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera9 tion with the Irvine Ranch Water District, California, is 

10 authorized to participate in the design, planning, and con11 struction of projects to naturally treat impaired surface 

12 water, reclaim and reuse impaired groundwater, and pro13 vide brine disposal within the San Diego Creek Watershed. 

14 ‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the costs 

15 of the projects authorized by this section shall not exceed 

16 25 percent of the total cost. 

17 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide 

18 funds for the operation or maintenance of a project au19 thorized by this section.’’. 

20 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

21 in section 2 of the Reclamation Projects Authorization and 

22 Adjustment Act of 1992 is amended by inserting after the 

23 item relating to section 1635 the following:

‘‘1636. Irvine basin groundwater and surface water improvement projects.’’.

Æ
§ 4.89 Vessels in foreign trade proceeding via domestic ports and touching at intermediate foreign ports. ( a ) A vessel proceeding from port to port in the United States in accordance with § 4.85, § 4.86, or § 4.87 may touch at an intermediate foreign port or ports to lade or discharge cargo or passengers. In such a case the vessel shall obtain clearance from the last port of departure in the United States before proceeding to the intermediate foreign port or ports at which it is intended to touch. The Cargo Declaration Outward With Commercial Forms, Customs Form 1302-A (see § 4.63), shall show the cargo for such foreign destination in the manner provided in § 4.88(c).
( b ) The master shall also present to the port director the Cargo Declaration or Cargo Declarations required by § 4.85, § 4.86, or § 4.87, and obtain a permit to proceed on the Vessel Entrance or Clearance Statement, Customs Form 1300, to the next port in the United States at which the vessel will touch.
( c ) Upon arrival at the next port in the United States after touching at a foreign port or ports a report of arrival and entry shall be made. The Cargo Declaration, Customs Form 1302, filed at time of entry shall list the cargo laden at the intermediate foreign port or ports.
( d ) The master shall also present to the port director the permit to proceed on the Vessel Entrance or Clearance Statement, Customs Form 1300, and the Cargo Declaration from the last previous port in the United States as provided for in § 4.85, § 4.86, or § 4.87.
[T.D. 77-255, 42 FR 56324, Oct. 25, 1977, as amended by T.D. 84-193, 49 FR 35485, Sept. 10, 1984; T.D. 00-22, 65 FR 16517, Mar. 29, 2000]
§ 146.81 Penalties. ( a ) *Amount.* Upon violation of the Act, or any regulation issued under the Act, by the grantee, or any officer, agent, operator or employee thereof, the person responsible for or permitting the violation shall be subject to a fine of not more than $1,000. Each day during which a violation continues will constitute a separate offense. Liquidated damages, where applicable, will be imposed in addition to the fine (19 U.S.C. 81s).
( b ) *Review.* All fines assessed by the port director under this section will be reviewed by the Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade, or his designee, Headquarters, to determine whether further action against the grantee or operator, such as suspension or a recommendation for revocation of the grant, is warranted.
[T.D. 86-16, 51 FR 5049, Feb. 11, 1986, as amended by T.D. 91-77, 56 FR 46115, Sept. 10, 1991]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-03-064 October 30, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

 NRC, PSEG TO DISCUSS LICENSING EXAMS

 FOR HOPE CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT OPERATORS

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of PSEG Nuclear

on Wednesday, November 5, to discuss the results of licensing examinations given to control

room operator candidates for the Hope Creek nuclear power plant earlier this year. The plant is

located in Hancocks Bridge (Salem County), N.J., and operated by PSEG Nuclear.

 The meeting is scheduled to begin at 9:30 a.m. in the Public Meeting Room at the NRC

Region I Office in King of Prussia, Pa. It will be open for public observation and members of the

public will have an opportunity to pose questions to NRC staff members prior to adjournment.

 In June, candidates for six senior reactor operator licenses and three reactor operator

licenses for the Hope Creek plant were administered initial licensing examinations. PSEG gave

the written portion of the exams while the NRC was responsible for conducting operating tests,

which took place in a plant simulator and during plant walk-throughs. Following the testing,

PSEG asked for changes to 10 of the more than 125 items that made up the written exams. For

example, the company stated that two of the questions had two correct answers and that in four

instances the answers needed basic changes or corrections.

 The NRC staff is concerned that the changes indicate a problem with the quality of the

written exams, particularly since the number of post-exam changes -- both for these tests and the

previous round of tests -- exceeds criteria established in examination standards used by the

agency.

 At the meeting on Nov. 5, the NRC staff plans to discuss this issue with PSEG

representatives as well as any corrective actions taken by the company in response.

###
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.5

December 30, 2002

Peter Frugone
One Rockefeller Plaza, Suite 1600
New York, NY  10020

Dear Mr. Frugone:

         This letter is to confirm our agreement that you will act as a
consultant and advisor to Donlar Biosyntrex (the "Company") in connection with
the Company's efforts to settle certain claims against the Company and others by
two groups of the Company's shareholders led by Charles A. Moskowitz and Martin
Goldberg (the "Claims"). You have and shall take various actions as we have
previously discussed to obtain the settlement and release of the Claims and in
return for such services, the Company shall issue you 2,000,000 shares of its
common stock simultaneously with the settlement and release of the Claims. Our
obligation to issue you the shares shall expire at 11:59 p.m. on December 31,
2002 if the Claims have not been settled and released prior to such time.

         If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding of our
agreement, please sign where indicated below and return a copy of this letter to
me by fax.

                                   Very truly yours,

                                   DONLAR BIOSYNTREX CORPORATION


                                   By: /s/ Larry P. Koskan
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                   Larry Koskan, President and CEO


Accepted and agreed to as of the
date first written above:

/s/ Peter Frugone
--------------------------------
Peter Frugone
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-49 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, April 7, 1998)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A subcommittee meeting of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory

Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS), originally scheduled for April 17 in

Rockville, Maryland, has been postponed due to the unavailability of documents.

Rescheduling of the meeting will be announced in a future Federal Register

notice.

#
### §92c. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 92c was editorially reclassified as section 5325 of this title.
Exhibit 31.1

SHOE CARNIVAL, INC.CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

|I, Mark L. Lemond, certify that:
|--------------------------------
|                                
|1.                              
|                                
|2.                              
|                                
|3.                              
|                                
|4.                              
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|5.                              
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                

|Date: | June 11, 2008 | By:/s/ Mark L. Lemond   | 
|----- | ------------- | ----------------------- | 
|      |               | Mark L. Lemond          | 
|      |               | President and           | 
|      |               | Chief Executive Officer | 

---
§ 1601.53 Fees. ( a ) The Board will allocate a portion of the TSP's administrative expenses to mutual fund users by charging an administrative fee of $55.00 annually. The amount of this fee will be redetermined once every three years by multiplying the average mutual fund window account balance by the TSP administrative expense ratio, as of the date of redetermination.
( b ) The fee described in paragraph (a) of this section is in addition to any mutual fund window account maintenance fees, trading fees, and fees and expenses associated with the specific mutual fund(s) in which the participant chooses to invest.
#### § 147.210 To whom must I distribute my drug-free workplace statement?

You must require that a copy of the statement described in § 147.205 be given to each employee who will be engaged in the performance of any Federal award.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH DECEMBER 31, 1998 FORM 10-K FILING.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      10,075,645
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,487
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    536,666
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,870,262
<PP&E>                                      89,115,254
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,329,038
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             100,650,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,619,671
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,111
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,905,653
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               100,650,718
<SALES>                                      2,917,450
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            68,952,362
<CGS>                                        1,371,503
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               57,108,986
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,243,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,253,098
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,096,830
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,154,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,942,330
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,942,330
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.94


</TABLE>
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-01-024 July 2, 2001 

 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov 

NRC TO MEET WITH SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS

SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT FARLEY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Southern Nuclear Operating

Company officials on Friday, July 13, to discuss the results of NRC's annual assessment of safety

performance at the Farley nuclear power plant.

The meeting will be held at 9:30 a.m.(CDT) in the Training Center Auditorium at the plant site

at 7388 North State Highway 95, at Columbia, Alabama, near Dothan. The public is invited to

observe the meeting. NRC officials will be available after the meeting to answer questions. The NRC

will hold a second meeting with state and local government officials after the first meeting. That

second meeting is also open to the public.

 Luis A. Reyes, administrator of the NRCís Region II office in Atlanta, will attend the meeting

with company officials. In a letter to the company dated May 31, Reyes said that overall, Farley has

operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and fully met all cornerstone (safety)

objectives. However, Reyes said that during the assessment period (April 2, 2000, to March 31, 2001),

several Farley performance indicators for equipment availability declined from the green performance

level to the white level, resulting in increased NRC oversight including additional inspections. NRC

safety performance reviews at commercial nuclear power plants utilize a color coding process ranging

from green to white to yellow to red, signifying progressive increases in significance and NRC

oversight. 

A letter sent from NRC Region II to Southern Nuclear, which addresses plant safety

performance during the previous year and forms the basis of the meeting discussion, is available from

the Region II Office of Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr . Current

information for the plant is available at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/FAR1/far1_chart.html

 and www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/FAR2/far2_chart.html .

###
#### Malcolm Ross Matheson, as Substituted Trustee, etc., Appellant, v. Ottilie Mente and Others, Defendants, and Thomas O’Callaghan, Respondent.

Order in so far as appealed from affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Dean M.
Leavitt, certify that:

1.  I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of U.S. Wireless Data, Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The
registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors:

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March
18, 2005

/s/ Dean M.
Leavitt
Dean M. Leavitt
Chairman of the Board
       (Former Chief Executive Officer
       and acting Principal Executive Officer)

---
### §302. Treasury of the United States

The United States Government has a Treasury of the United States. The Treasury is in the Department of the Treasury.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 879.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 302 | 31:472. | R.S. §3591. |

The section is substituted for the source provisions to eliminate unnecessary words and because of subsequent laws and the restatement in the revised title about the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury and coins, currency, accounts, depositaries, and public debt of the United States Government.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 24, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-30914

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TAMMY M. SCOTT, also known as Sealed Defendant 1,

Defendant-Appellant

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:04-CR-156-1

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tammy M. Scott challenges the 60-month sentence that was

imposed following her conviction for three charges of

distribution of cocaine base. She argues that counsel rendered

ineffective assistance and that the district court erred by

failing to sua sponte recognize counsel’s deficiencies and to

reduce her sentence accordingly. 

We decline to review Scott’s ineffective assistance claim in

this direct appeal. See United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312,

313-14 (5th Cir. 1987). Scott’s argument concerning the district
No. 05-30914

-2-

court’s purported failure to recognize counsel’s deficiencies is

unpersuasive. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsInvestigation of thermospheric winds relative to space station orbital altitudesAn investigation of thermospheric winds, relative to the space station orbital altitudes, was made in order to provide information that is useful in an environmental disturbance assessment. Current plans are for this low Earth orbiting facility to orbit at an inclination of 28.5 deg. The orbital altitudes were not yet defined due to the evolutionary configuration of the Space Station. The upper and lower bounds of the orbital altitudes will be based on constraints set by the drag and expected orbital decay and delivery altitude capability of the Shuttle. The orbital altitude will be estimated on the order of 500 km. Neutral winds in the region from about 80 to 600 km which were derived from satellite drag data, Fabry-Perot interferometers, sounding rockets, ground-based optical Doppler techniques, incoherent scatter radar measurements from Millstone Hill combined with the mass spectrometer and lithium trail neutral wind measurements are examined. The equations of motion of the low Earth orbiting facility are also discussed.Document ID19840017152Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSusko, M.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1984Subject CategoryMeteorology And ClimatologyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:82577NASA-TM-82577Accession Number84N25220Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840017152.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024