alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov 

No. III-03-034 April 17, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

SPECIAL INSPECTION TEAM TO REVIEW VALVE FAILURE AT QUAD CITIES PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has dispatched a special inspection team to the Quad

Cities Nuclear Power Station to review the circumstances surrounding a valve failure that led to the

shutdown of the Unit 2 reactor Wednesday afternoon. 

The plant, located at Cordova, Illinois, is operated by Exelon Generation Company. Quad

Cities Unit 1 remains in operation.

A pressure relief valve, which is part of the reactor cooling system, opened unexpectedly and

failed to close, transferring steam from the reactor to a water-filled tank called a pressure suppression

pool. The steam condensed to water and remained in the tank. 

When plant operators were unable to close the valve, they shut the Unit 2 reactor down. There

were no releases of radioactivity associated with the incident.

The pressure relief valve is designed to allow reactor operators to reduce pressure in the reactor

cooling system if needed to respond to unexpected conditions or problems.

Exelon declared an “alert” under its emergency plan and notified appropriate local, state, and

federal agencies. An alert is the second lowest of four emergency levels.

NRC inspectors at the plant monitored the utility’s response to the valve problem, and the

agency staffed the Incident Response Center in the Region III Office in Lisle, Illinois.

The alert classification was terminated at 10:51 p.m. (CDT) Wednesday after the reactor was

placed in cold shutdown with the cooling system below the boiling point. The utility is continuing to

investigate the cause of the valve failure and formulate repair plans.

The special inspection team will issue a report about 45 days after the completion of the

inspection. The report will be available from the NRC Region III Office of Public Affairs and online in

the NRC’s electronic reading room at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html

# # #
**Exhibit
      32**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of GLOBAL EPOINT, INC. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daryl F. Gates, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
      of my knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






August 20,
      2007




/s/
                DARYL F. GATES**Daryl
                F. Gates,**
              **Chief
                Executive Officer**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of GLOBAL EPOINT, INC. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Pan, Chief
      Financial Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      the best of my knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






August
      20, 2007




/s/
                JOHN PAN**John
                Pan,**
              **Chief
                Financial Officer and
                Chairman**




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
      retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
#### James Garofano, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Vincenzo Covino and Sabino Guarino, Appellants.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
!
  

 "#  

"






$

  "
 % 

%









 	
 


 #

 !



 &





' 

"


( )#

(  

 

)


 

$'

*

( 


 




 









 

 

 















 





 


!



 "

 #








$


!

 

%&

&






 

'



&



'









 




   




(



%

) 



*



(

+

+

"

'

,( !



(





!



-





$











,





,(

.* 

 


 
(


!#



 

*

!




/

,

0

,




,!








'

'(

'

%

%

%

.!

+






!

'



"1

 





.

.

-&




  

 



 ##

**

1 

 

 2



 

 (



3(

 *

 

 

.*

 

 ! 


 



 








)

 

!





'

'4



$(

 

$&  






 

'  

%  

%#

 %*



!





.




*



	





	




	 



 






  

!

"


  

!

#




$


+,-.,/0




%&

'&



%&

%

$"

%

 %

()



%&

'&

'&

$ (	

% 

"


 

&

%

%&

') *	

% 

'&

% 

!

% 

$

%&

'&

% 


+&



+&&

(+ 

&! ,--. $

 $   

  & & %

$ (5(



 /& 44

%

/& (

   $ (

5

 $ (

+( $ (

( $ 

,6 +

 (

!*1
)2 3!14 1!5,)
*

















































































"
  


 !

 



67 

Administrative Boundary
§ 206.55 Investigations to evaluate the effectiveness of relief. ( a ) *Investigation.* After any action taken under section 203 has terminated, the Commission will conduct an investigation for the purpose of evaluating the effectiveness of the relief action in facilitating positive adjustment by the domestic industry to import competition, consistent with the reasons set out by the President in the report submitted to the Congress under section 203(b) of the Trade Act.
( b ) *Hearing.* In the course of such investigation, the Commission will hold a hearing at which interested persons will be given an opportunity to be present, to produce evidence, and to be heard.
( c ) *Time for reporting.* The Commission will submit its report to the President and to the Congress by no later than the 180th day after the day on which the action terminated.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 64825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27304]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AC19-44-000]


El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on December 6, 2018, El Paso Natural Gas Company, 
L.L.C. filed a request for approval to use Account 439, authorized by 
the Financial Accounting Standards Board.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
eLibrary link and is available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
website that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5c1a190e1f1332303532390f292c2c332e281c3a392e3f723b332a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="22646770616d4c4e4b4c47715752524d505662444750410c454d54">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comments: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on December 26, 2018.

    Dated: December 12, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-27304 Filed 12-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-04-012 March 17, 2004

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

 

NRC TO MEET WITH PROGRESS ENERGY OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS SAFETY

PERFORMANCE AT HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Progress Energy officials on

Wednesday, March 24, to discuss the results of NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at the

Harris nuclear power plant southwest of Raleigh, North Carolina.

The meeting will be held at 2:00 p.m. in the Holiday Inn Express, 1006 Marco Drive in Apex,

North Carolina. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be available

before the conclusion of the meeting to answer any questions.

The NRC found that the Harris plant was operated safely during the previous year and met all

the safety objectives in the NRC’s oversight program. The NRC also found that an inspection of a

performance issue relating to the number of unplanned plant shutdowns concluded that corrective

actions were adequate. Several other minor issues evaluated during the period were determined to be

of very low safety significance.

In addition to the routine NRC inspections at the Harris plant, the agency will conduct

inspections of rector vessel lower head penetrations, containment sump blockage and a pilot inspection

of plant design issues. The NRC will also continue to conduct inspections of the plant’s

implementation of NRC security Orders, along with any newly developed portions of the security

program. 

 The letter describing Harris plant safety performance is available from Region II Public Affairs

and on the NRC web site at 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/har_2003q4.pdf .

 Current performance indicators for the Harris plant are available at 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/HAR1/har1_chart.html .

###
§ 206.63 Contents of petition. A petition under section 422(b) of the Trade Act shall include specific information in support of the claim that an action described in section 422(c) of the Trade Act has caused, or threatens to cause, a significant diversion of trade into the domestic market of the United States. To comply with that requirement and the requirements in paragraphs (a) through (f) of this section, the petition shall include all relevant information that is reasonably available to the petitioner with due diligence. The petition shall include the following information: ( a ) *Product description.* The name and description of the imported product concerned, specifying the United States tariff provision under which such article is classified and the current tariff treatment thereof, and the name and description of the domestic product concerned;
( b ) *Representativeness.* ( 1 ) The names and addresses of the firms represented in the petition and/or the firms employing or previously employing the workers represented in the petition and the locations of their establishments in which the domestic product is produced;
( 2 ) The percentage of domestic production of the domestic product that such represented firms and/or workers account for and the basis for asserting that petitioner is representative of an industry; and
( 3 ) The names and locations of all other producers of the domestic product known to the petitioner;
( c ) *Description of the action.* A description of the action or actions, as defined in section 422(c) of the Trade Act, that allegedly has caused or threatens to cause a significant diversion of trade into the domestic market of the United States;
( d ) *Trade diversion data.* ( 1 ) The actual or imminent increase in United States market share held by such imports from the People's Republic of China;
( 2 ) The actual or imminent increase in volume of such imports into the United States;
( 3 ) The nature and extent of the action taken or proposed by the WTO member concerned;
( 4 ) The extent of exports from the People's Republic of China to that WTO member and to the United States;
( 5 ) The actual or imminent changes in exports to that WTO member due to the action taken or proposed;
( 6 ) The actual or imminent diversion of exports from the People's Republic of China to countries other than the United States;
( 7 ) Cyclical or seasonal trends in import volumes into the United States of the products at issue; and
( 8 ) Conditions of demand and supply in the United States market for the products at issue;
( e ) *Import data.* Any import data available to the petitioner that will aid the Commission in examining, pursuant to section 422(d)(2) of the Trade Act, the changes in imports into the United States from the People's Republic of China since the time that the WTO member commenced the investigation that led to a request for consultations described in section 422(a) of the Act; and
( f ) *Relief sought and purpose thereof.* A statement describing the import relief sought under section 422(h) of the Trade Act and the purpose thereof.
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93024, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 173.3 Voluntary reliquidation. ( a ) *Authority to reliquidate.* Within 90 days from the date notice of deemed liquidation or notice of the original liquidation is given to the importer, consignee, or agent, the Center director may reliquidate on his own initiative a liquidation or a reliquidation to correct errors in appraisement, classification, or any other element entering into the liquidation or reliquidation, including errors based on misconstruction of applicable law. A voluntary reliquidation may be made even though a protest has been filed, and whether the error is discovered by the Center director or is brought to his attention by an interested party.
( b ) *Notice of reliquidation.* Notice of a voluntary reliquidation will be given in accordance with the requirements for giving notice of the original liquidation.
[T.D. 70-181, 35 FR 13429, Aug. 22, 1970, as amended by CBP Dec. 07-62, 72 FR 40737, July 25, 2007; CBP Dec. 11-02, 76 FR 2577, Jan. 14, 2011]
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-02-0116 - Proposed Rule:  10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70:  Financial Assurance Amendments for Materials Licensees

Accession Number: ML011610003

Date Released: Tuesday, August 27, 2002

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML021550167 - SECY-02-0116 - Proposed Rule:  10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70:  Financial Assurance Amendments for Materials Licensees (6 page(s), 6/27/2002)
    - ML011570553 - SRM-SECY-01-0084 - "Rulemaking Plan: Financial Assurance Amendments for Materials Licensees." (1 page(s), 6/6/2001)
    - ML021550204 - SECY-02-0116Atch2 - Federal Register Notice re:  Financial Assurance Amendments for Materials Licensees for 10 CFR Parts 30,40, and 70 (32 page(s), 6/27/2002)
    - ML021550212 - SECY-02-0116Atch3 - Regulatory Analysis for Proposed Rule - Financial Assurance Amendments for Materials Licensees - 10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70 (15 page(s), 6/27/2002)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61078-61079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23048]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 34542]


Fulton County Railway, LLC--Lease and Operation Exemption--CSX 
Transportation, Inc.

    Fulton County Railway, LLC (FCR), a noncarrier, has filed a 
verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to lease from CSX 
Transportation, Inc. (CSXT), and operate approximately 55 miles of rail 
lines located in Atlanta, GA. The rail lines extend from: (1) Milepost 
ANO 855.06, V.S. 3+30, at Fulco Junction, westerly to milepost ANO 
858.72, V.S. 196+31; (2) milepost ANO 858.72, V.S. 196+31 northeasterly 
to milepost ANO 860.75, V.S. 304+70, at the northeast end of the line; 
and (3) V.S. 196+31 = V.S. 0+00 southwesterly to V.S. 208+94, at the 
southwest end of the line, through the Fulco Industrial Park, including 
the track in the Fulco Yard, and the appurtenant sidings, and 
industrial tracks.
    This transaction is related to STB Finance Docket No. 34543, 
Patrick D. Broe and OmniTRAX, Inc.--Continuance in Control Exemption--
Fulton County Railway, LLC., wherein Patrick D. Broe and OmniTRAX, 
Inc., have filed a notice of exemption to continue in control of FCR 
upon its becoming a Class III rail carrier.
    FCR certifies that its projected revenues as a result of this 
transaction will not result in FCR's becoming a Class II or Class I 
rail carrier, and further certifies that its projected annual revenues 
will not exceed $5 million.
    The transaction is expected to be consummated on or shortly after 
October 15, 2004.
    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to 
revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 34542, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a 
copy of each pleading must be served on Karl Morell, Of Counsel, Ball 
Janik, LLP, 1455 F

[[Page 61079]]

Street, NW., Suite 225, Washington, DC 20005.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at 
www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: October 7, 2004.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-23048 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
§ 1320.6 Public protection. ( a ) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information that is subject to the requirements of this part if: ( 1 ) The collection of information does not display, in accordance with § 1320.3(f) and § 1320.5(b)(1), a currently valid OMB control number assigned by the Director in accordance with the Act; or
( 2 ) The agency fails to inform the potential person who is to respond to the collection of information, in accordance with § 1320.5(b)(2), that such person is not required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
( b ) The protection provided by paragraph (a) of this section may be raised in the form of a complete defense, bar, or otherwise to the imposition of such penalty at any time during the agency administrative process in which such penalty may be imposed or in any judicial action applicable thereto.
( c ) Whenever an agency has imposed a collection of information as a means for proving or satisfying a condition for the receipt of a benefit or the avoidance of a penalty, and the collection of information does not display a currently valid OMB control number or inform the potential persons who are to respond to the collection of information, as prescribed in § 1320.5(b), the agency shall not treat a person's failure to comply, in and of itself, as grounds for withholding the benefit or imposing the penalty. The agency shall instead permit respondents to prove or satisfy the legal conditions in any other reasonable manner. ( 1 ) If OMB disapproves the whole of such a collection of information (and the disapproval is not overridden under § 1320.15), the agency shall grant the benefit to (or not impose the penalty on) otherwise qualified persons without requesting further proof concerning the condition.
( 2 ) If OMB instructs an agency to make a substantive or material change to such a collection of information (and the instruction is not overridden under § 1320.15), the agency shall permit respondents to prove or satisfy the condition by complying with the collection of information as so changed.
( d ) Whenever a member of the public is protected from imposition of a penalty under this section for failure to comply with a collection of information, such penalty may not be imposed by an agency directly, by an agency through judicial process, or by any other person through administrative or judicial process.
( e ) The protection provided by paragraph (a) of this section does not preclude the imposition of a penalty on a person for failing to comply with a collection of information that is imposed on the person by statute—e.g., 26 U.S.C. § 6011(a) (statutory requirement for person to file a tax return), 42 U.S.C. § 6938(c) (statutory requirement for person to provide notification before exporting hazardous waste).
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-97-65 September 12, 1997

Contact: Ken Clark (404) 562-4416 Roger Hannah (404) 562-

4417

NRC OFFICIALS TO MEET WITH DUKE MANAGERS AT OCONEE NUCLEAR

PLANT TO DISCUSS PLANT PERFORMANCE AND EMERGENCY POWER

Officials from the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Duke Power Company are

scheduled to meet at the Oconee nuclear plant site near Seneca, South Carolina at 1:00 p.m. on

Monday, September 22, to discuss company efforts to improve performance at the plant and the

status of the plant’s emergency power supply.

The meeting is open to observation by interested members of the public, and NRC

officials will be available at its conclusion to answer questions from observers.

The meeting is part of a series of bi-monthly meetings between the NRC and Duke to

discuss plant performance and other issues of current interest at Oconee.

#