alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-01-009 March 9, 2001

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $5,500 FINE

FOR GLOBAL X-RAY & TESTING CORP.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a fine of $5,500 against Global X-Ray

& Testing Corp. for failing to operate radiography equipment in accordance with safety regulations.

Global, based in Amelia, La., performs radiography work for off-shore pipe laying and other

operations.

This enforcement action is the first resulting from a new NRC partnership with the U.S.

Minerals Management Service, which provides NRC inspectors access to off-shore operations for the

first time.

The company violated safety regulations in using a device called a “pipeliner” to inspect the

welds joining sections of pipe being laid on the floor of the Gulf of Mexico to transport oil and gas

from offshore production operations. Pipeliners contain a strong radioactive source that takes an Xray-like picture of the welds being inspected to insure there are no flaws. The radioactive source,

normally iridium-192, is exposed to the welds by a shutter operated by a knob on the pipeliner. NRC

safety rules require that an extended handle be used to open and close the shutter to reduce the

exposure of the operator’s hand to radiation. An NRC inspector found that Global employees were not

using an extension device when operating pipeliners. No radiation over-exposures to operators

occurred because of the failure to follow safety regulations.

Global officers met with the NRC in Arlington, Texas, on February 8 to discuss circumstances

surrounding this violation and others that were found during the NRC’s inspection of Global’s

operations. Subsequently, the NRC determined that the problem was a level III violation on the NRC’s

four-level scale. A level I problem is the most severe. Level III violations carry a $5,500 base civil

penalty, subject to adjustment based on various factors. Of the three other violations found, one was a

level III that resulted in no civil penalty, and the other two were level IV violations, which have no fine

associated.
Global has corrected all the cited violations; however, the NRC may increase its inspections.

The company has 30 days to pay the fine or protest it. If the protest is denied, the company may request

a hearing by the NRC.

Copies of the Notice of Violation sent to Global X-ray and the NRC’s inspection report can be

found on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OE/rpr/ea00272.htm.

###
### §24. Proof of citizenship

Proof of citizenship, under sections 21, 22 to 24, 26 to 28, 29, 30, 33 to 48, 50 to 52, 71 to 76 of this title and section 661 of title 43, may consist, in the case of an individual, of his own affidavit thereof; in the case of an association of persons unincorporated, of the affidavit of their authorized agent, made on his own knowledge, or upon information and belief; and in the case of a corporation organized under the laws of the United States, or of any State or Territory thereof, by the filing of a certified copy of their charter or certificate of incorporation.

(R.S. §2321.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 21, 22 to 24, 26 to 28, 29, 30, 33 to 48, 50 to 52, 71 to 76 of this title and section 661 of title 43, referred to in text, were in the original "this chapter", meaning chapter 6 of title 32 of the Revised Statutes, consisting of R.S. §§2318 to 2352.

#### Codification

R.S. §2321 derived from act May 10, 1872, ch. 152, §7, 17 Stat. 94.
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Electric Power
Trust II (the “Trust”) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Trust hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Trust.








/s/
      Randall D. HolmesName:
                Randall
      D. HolmesTitle:
                President
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)Date:
                May 6,
      2009






/s/
      Jeffrey H. StrasbergName:
              Jeffrey
      H. StrasbergTitle:
              Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)Date:
              May 6,
      2009
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of eMagin Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew G. Sculley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








October 7, 2011
By:
/s/ Andrew G. SculleyAndrew G. SculleyChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
§ 1201.29 Dismissal without prejudice. ( a ) *In general.* Dismissal without prejudice is a procedural option that allows for the dismissal and subsequent refiling of an appeal.
( b ) *Procedure.* Dismissal without prejudice may be granted on the judge's own motion or upon request by either party. The decision whether to dismiss an appeal without prejudice is committed to the sound discretion of the judge, and may be granted when the interests of fairness, due process, and administrative efficiency outweigh any prejudice to either party.
( c ) *Refiling.* Except in certain USERRA appeals under Part 1208 involving the use of military leave, a decision dismissing an appeal without prejudice will include a date certain by which the appeal must be refiled. The judge will determine whether the appeal must be refiled by the appellant or whether it will be automatically refiled by the judge as of a date certain. When a dismissal without prejudice is issued over the objection of the appellant, the appeal will be automatically refiled as of a date certain.
( d ) *Waiver.* When a dismissed appeal must be refiled by the appellant, requests for waiver of a late filing based upon good cause will be liberally construed.
[77 FR 62365, Oct. 12, 2012]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 FORM 10-Q FILING.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,370,628
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  130,759
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,580,654
<PP&E>                                      35,129,080
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,033,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,765,406
<BONDS>                                      7,450,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,660
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,407,704
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,033,964
<SALES>                                        851,906
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,942,516
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               874,247
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,068,269
<INCOME-TAX>                                   758,975
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,309,294
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 85,771
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,395,065
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone 301/415-820

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-068 May 27, 2003

NRC LICENSING BOARD DECISIONS ON FINANCIAL ASSURANCE ISSUES

 REGARDING PRIVATE FUEL STORAGE APPLICATION

The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, an independent judicial arm of the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, has issued three separate decisions -- two partial initial decisions and a

memorandum and order granting summary disposition -- finding that the Private Fuel Storage

consortium (PFS) is financially qualified to construct, operate, and decommission a spent nuclear

fuel storage facility in Utah.

The proposed above-ground facility is intended to house temporarily the waste fuel from

U.S. nuclear power plants that is eventually destined for a permanent storage facility. The PFS

facility would be located on the Reservation of the Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians, about

50 miles southwest of Salt Lake City. 

A formal hearing was held in mid-2000 in which the Licensing Board received evidence

on a number of issues challenging the PFS proposal.

The Board’s rulings today on the financial assurance issues, although favorable to PFS,

do not permit the issuance of a facility license, because in a March 10 decision another Licensing

Board found that the probability of an accidental crash stemming from nearby military aircraft

operations was too high. PFS and the NRC technical staff have sought review of that ruling by

the Commission. PFS is also understood to be preparing to argue at a future Board hearing that

even if a military aircraft were to crash into the facility, it would have no adverse radiological

consequences. Pending the outcome of those attempts to obtain full license approval, PFS is also

seeking approval to proceed with a much smaller site that it contends would reduce accident

probabilities to a permissible level (see May 13 press release regarding May 29 Board sessions

on these matters).

Another issue from earlier hearings that also remains to be resolved before the PFS

proposal can be licensed is the environmental aspects of the proposed rail line down Skull Valley

that would serve the facility.
The Licensing Board’s decisions on financial issues will not be immediately publicly

available because they may contain proprietary information. After the parties provide the Board

with their views on what portions of the decisions need to be redacted, the Board intends to

release publicly the decisions and portions of the evidentiary record underlying the decisions,

although without the confidential information. The abridged versions will be available through 

the NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . Help in using ADAMS is available from the NRC

Public Document Room at 301/415-4737 or 1/800/397-4209. 

###
§ 179.208 Certification. ( a ) OPM salary offset coordinator shall provide a certification to the paying agency in all cases where: ( 1 ) The hearing official determines that a debt exists;
( 2 ) The employee fails to contest the existence and amount of the debt by failing to request a hearing; or
( 3 ) The employee fails to contest the existence of the debt by failing to appear at a hearing.
( b ) The certification must be in writing and must state: ( 1 ) That the employee owes the debt;
( 2 ) The amount and basis of the debt;
( 3 ) The date the Government's right to collect the debt first accrued;
( 4 ) That the Office's regulations have been approved by OPM pursuant to 5 CFR part 550, subpart K;
( 5 ) The date on which payment(s) is due;
( 6 ) If the collection is to be made in installments, the number of installments to be collected, the amount of each installment or percentage of disposable pay, and the commencement date of the first installment, if a date other than the next officially established pay period is required; and
( 7 ) The date(s) of any action(s) taken under 5 U.S.C. 5514(b).
§ 1639.8 Interest, penalty, and administrative costs. ( a ) *Interest.* The Board will assess interest on all delinquent debts unless prohibited by statute, regulation, or contract. ( 1 ) Interest begins to accrue on all debts from the date the initial notice is mailed or hand-delivered to the debtor. The Board will not recover interest if the debt is paid within 30 days of the date of the initial notice. The Board will assess an annual rate of interest that is equal to the rate of the current value of funds to the United States Treasury (*i.e.,* the Treasury tax and loan account rate) as prescribed and published by the Secretary of the Treasury in the Federal Register and the Treasury Fiscal Requirements Manual Bulletins, unless a different rate is necessary to protect the interests of the Board. The Board will notify the debtor of the basis for its finding when a different rate is necessary to protect the Board's interests.
( 2 ) The Executive Director may extend the 30-day period for payment where he determines that such action is in the best interest of the Board. A decision to extend or not to extend the payment period is final and is not subject to further review.
( b ) *Penalty.* The Board will assess a penalty charge, not to exceed six percent a year, on any portion of a debt that is not paid within 90 days of the initial notice.
( c ) *Administrative costs.* The Board will assess charges to cover administrative costs incurred as the result of the debtor's failure to pay a debt within 30 days of the date of the initial notice. Administrative costs include the additional costs incurred in processing and handling the debt because it became delinquent, such as costs incurred in obtaining a credit report, or in using a private collection contractor, or service fees charged by a Federal agency for collection activities undertaken on behalf of the Board.
( d ) *Allocation of payments.* A partial payment by a debtor will be applied first to outstanding administrative costs, second to penalty assessments, third to accrued interest, and then to the outstanding debt principal.
( e ) *Waiver.* ( 1 ) The Executive Director may (without regard to the amount of the debt) waive collection of all or part of accrued interest, penalty, or administrative costs, if he determines that collection of these charges would be against equity and good conscience or not in the best interest of the Board.
( 2 ) A decision to waive interest, penalty charges, or administrative costs may be made at any time before a debt is paid. However, where these charges have been collected before the waiver decision, they will not be refunded. The Executive Director's decision to waive or not waive collection of these charges is final and is not subject to further review.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 03-163 December 15, 2003

 NRC FINDS NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FROM

 EXTENDED OPERATION OF H.B. ROBINSON NUCLEAR PLANT 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued its final environmental impact statement

on the proposed renewal of the operating license of Unit 2, the nuclear power facility, at the H.B.

Robinson Steam Electric Plant. In the environmental impact statement, the NRC staff found there are

no environmental impacts that would preclude license renewal for an additional 20 years of operation.

The H.B. Robinson nuclear facility is located 26 miles from Florence, South Carolina. The

operating license for Unit 2 expires on July 31, 2010.

Carolina Power & Light Co., the operator of the plant, submitted an application for renewal of

the license on June 17, 2002.

As part of its environmental review of the application, the NRC held public meetings near the

plant to discuss the scope of the review and a draft version of the environmental impact statement for

the facility. Comments were received from members of the public, local officials and representatives of

State and other Federal agencies.

Copies of the statement are available electronically through the NRC’s Agency-Wide

Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html . The report’s ADAMS accession number is

ML033450517 . Help in using ADAMS is available by contacting the NRC Public Document Room

staff at 301-415-4737, or 1-800-397-4209, or by sending a message to pdr@nrc.gov via e-mail. The

report also is available for public inspection at the NRC’s Public Document Room, located at One

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

###
### SUBCHAPTER VII—ADMINISTRATIVE AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report of The Newark Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the year ended April 30, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Joseph E. Byrne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition ofthe Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented. 

Dated: July 27, 2006

 

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure statement. 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-054 May 4, 2004

NRC ISSUES REVIEW STANDARD

FOR EARLY SITE PERMIT APPLICATIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued its review standard for early site permit

applications for possible new nuclear power plants.

The early site permit process resolves site-related issues regarding possible future construction

and operation of a nuclear power plant at a site selected by an applicant. The review standard covers

issues such as population density, probable maximum floods that could affect a site, stability of

subsurface materials and foundations, aircraft hazards and emergency planning. The review standard

also informs potential applicants and other stakeholders of the information the staff needs to perform

its review.

The review standard is available through the NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and

Management System (ADAMS) on the agency’s web site, by entering accession number

ML040700094 at this address: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html .

Help in using ADAMS is available from the Public Document Room staff by calling 1-800-397-4209.

For further information Contact : Michael L. Scott, Project Manager, New Reactor Licensing

Project Office, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, via telephone at (301)

415-1421 or by e-mail at mls3@nrc.gov.

###
#### § 212.12 Documentation of fees and expenses.

The application shall be accompanied by full documentation of the fees and expenses, including the cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, project or similar matter, for which an award is sought. A separate itemized statement shall be submitted for each professional firm or individual whose services are covered by the application, showing the hours spent in connection with the proceeding by each individual, a description of the specific services performed, the rate at which each fee has been computed, any expenses for which reimbursement is sought, the total amount claimed, and the total amount paid or payable by the applicant or by any other person or entity for the services provided. The presiding officer may require the applicant to provide vouchers, receipts, or other substantiation for any expenses claimed.