alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Return
      to Main Document


EXHIBIT
      32.1








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Mexoro Minerals Limited (the “Company”) on
      Form
      10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2005, as filed with the United
      States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:








(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and








(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














Date:
      March 16, 2007


/s/
      Robert Knight


Chief
      Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2401]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Southwest Idaho Resource Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393), the Boise and Payette 
National Forests' Southwest Idaho Resource Advisory Committee will 
conduct a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

DATES: Wednesday, February 18, 2004, beginning at 10:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Idaho Counties Risk Management Program Building, 3100 South 
Vista Avenue, Boise, Idaho.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Swick, Designated Federal 
Officer, at (208) 634-0401 or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0e7c7d79676d654e687d20686b6a207b7d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cbb9b8bca2a8a08badb8e5adaeafe5beb8">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda topics will include review and 
approval of project proposals, and is an open public forum.

    Dated: January 29, 2004.
Mark J. Madrid,
Forest Supervisor, Payette National Forest.
[FR Doc. 04-2401 Filed 2-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61999-62000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23608]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 54

[CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 97-21, and 02-6; FCC 04-181]


Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; Changes to the 
Board of Directors for the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc.; 
and Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects an error in the dates and supplementary 
sections of a Federal Register document regarding the Commission 
addressing pending petitions for reconsideration filed by Sprint 
Corporation, United States Telecom Association, Inc., and MCI Worldcom, 
Inc. The Commission agreed with petitioners that the Commission should 
seek recovery from schools and libraries in certain instances, and 
therefore grants their petitions in part. The Commission resolved the 
limited question raised in the Second Further Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking (Second FNPRM) in CC Docket No. 02-06 of from whom the 
Commission will seek recovery of schools and libraries funds disbursed 
in violation of the statute or a rule. The Commission modified its 
requirements in this area so that recovery will be sought from 
whichever party or parties has committed the statutory or rule 
violation. The summary was published in the Federal Register on 
September 17, 2004.

DATES: Effective October 17, 2004.

[[Page 62000]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Schneider, Attorney, 
Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 
(202) 418-7400.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This summary contains a correction to the 
dates and supplementary sections of a Federal Register summary, 69 FR 
55983 (September 17, 2004). The full text of the Commission's Order on 
Reconsideration and Fourth Report and Order in CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 
97-21, and 02-6, FCC 04-181 released on July 30, 2004 is available for 
public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference 
Center, Room CY-A257, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.

0
In rule FR Doc. 04-21005 published September 17, 2004 (69 FR 55983) 
make the following corrections.
0
1. On page 55983, in the first column, in the dates section, remove 
``September 17, 2004'' and add in its place ``October 17, 2004.''

0
2. On page 55985, in the second column, in paragraph 24, remove 
``September 17, 2004'' and add in its place ``October 17, 2004.''

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-23608 Filed 10-21-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
### §6502. Procurement of temporary help

#### (a) In general

(1) Subject to regulations that the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate may prescribe, the Secretary of the Senate and the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate may procure temporary help services from a private sector source that offers such services. Each procurement of services under this subsection shall be for no longer than 30 days.

(2) A person performing services procured under paragraph (1) shall not, during the period of the performance of the services, be an employee of the United States or be considered to be an employee of the United States for any purpose.

#### (b) Effective date

This section shall take effect on October 1, 2001, and shall apply in fiscal year 2002 and successive fiscal years.

(Pub. L. 107–68, title I, §109, Nov. 12, 2001, 115 Stat. 569.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 61f–10 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Congressional Operations Appropriations Act, 2002, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2002.
No. 12,817.

#### Bordner *v.*Board of County Commissioners of Baca County.

(18 P. [2d] 323)

Decided December 27, 1932.

Messrs. Grant, Ellis, Shaeroth & Toll, for plaintiff in error.

*82..Messrs-.:Areaj & Reynolds, Mr. Clarence L. Ireland, Attorney General, Mr. Charles Roach, Deputy, Mr. Fred A. Harrison, Assistant, for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*'

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the court.

William S. Bordner sued the board of county commissioners of Baca county to recover $466.22, being* the total protested tax payments made during*-the years 1922 .to 1928 inclusive upon the equity in certain school lands, contending that said taxes were based upon assessments which were void because “plaintiff owed a greater debt upon said lands than the value of said lands” and that “plaintiff did not own an equity in said lands of any value whatsoever.” A demurrer to this complaint was sustained and the cause dismissed, a review of which is here sought.

The action is based upon section 7447, C. L. of ’21, which provides: “In all cases where any person shall pay any tax, interest or cost, or any portion thereof, that shall thereafter be found to be erroneous or illegal, whether the same be owing to erroneous assessment, to improper or irregular levying of the tax, or clerical or other errors or irregularities, the board of county commissioners shall refund the same without abatement or discount to the taxpayer.”

Section 7193, C. L. of ’21 provides: “That all equities in state and school lands purchased under contract, taken from the state shall, during the life of the contract, be taxed at their full cash value * * *” The validity of this statute was not questioned.

The complaint charges that- plaintiff’s -equity in- such land was taxed. Such 'equity, is a property right notwithstanding it may have no cash value. If of no value, an assessment thereof'would be merely excessive and not illegal.

*83In such circumstances the taxpayer must first seek administrative relief afforded by statute and in the absence of allegation and proof of such action cannot recover.

 Although the complaint alleges that the taxes were paid under protest, it does not contain the indispensable allegation that any administrative remedy was invoked. *First National Bank v. Patterson,*65 Colo. 166, 176 Pac. 498; *Union Nat. Bank v. Commissioners,*75 Colo. 298, 225 Pac. 851; *People v. District Court,*87 Colo. 316, 287 Pac. 849; *First Nat. Bank v. Weld County,*264 U. S. 450, 44 Sup. Ct. 385, 68 L. Ed. 784.

Judgment affirmed.
### Docket Number: FAA - 2012 - 1227

**Contacts.** With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted **Date** Response **National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti**  1/17/12 **Regional Airline Association** 1/17/12 **Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman**  1/17/12 **ATA Joe White**  1/17/12
#### § 190.28 Person entitled to claim manufacturing drawback.

The exporter (or destroyer) will be entitled to claim drawback, unless the exporter (or destroyer), by means of a certification, assigns the right to claim drawback to the manufacturer, producer, importer, or intermediate party. Such certification must accompany each claim and also affirm that the exporter (or destroyer) has not claimed and will not itself claim drawback or assign the right to claim drawback on the particular exportation or destruction to any other party. The certification provided for under this section may be a blanket certification for a stated period. Drawback is paid to the claimant, who may be the manufacturer, producer, intermediate party, importer, or exporter (or destroyer).
CHINA

AUSTRALIA

INDIA

PAKISTAN

MONGOLIA

RUSSIA

RUSSIA

TURKEY

ARMENIA

GEORGIA

KAZAKHSTAN

KYRGYZSTAN

TAJIKISTAN

IRAQ IRAN

SAUDI ARABIA

TURKMENISTAN

UZBEKISTAN

AFGHANISTAN

BURMA

(MYANMAR)

THAILAND

CAMBODIA

VIETNAM

NORTH

KOREA

REPUBLIC

OF KOREA JAPAN

EAST

TIMOR

PAPUA

NEW

GUINEA

NEW ZEALAND

PHILIPPINES

BRUNEI

SINGAPORE

INDONESIA

MALAYSIA

MADAGASCAR

COMOROS

SOMALIA

YEMEN

OMAN

KUWAIT

DJIBOUTI

QATAR

U.A.E

AZERBAIJAN

ETHIOPIA SRI LANKA

NEPAL

BANGLADESH

BHUTAN

LAOS

TAIWAN

MALDIVES

MAURITIUS 

MICRONESIA

SOLOMON

ISLANDS

PALAU MARSHALL ISLANDS

TUVA

VANUATU

KIR

$

$

$

Z

Z

Z

Z

T

T

T

T

T

T



















y y

@

@

@

@

@

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Z

#

#

#

&

&

& &

&

&

ZZ

#

$

%

&

&

& y

T

@





Avian InflueClimate ForConflict PreDisaster PreDrought PreEarthquake Flood PrepaHydrometeoPsychosociaVolcano Mon

USAID/OFDA ACTIVE PREPAREDNESS AND MITIGAT

IN ASIA - PA

DenoteUSAID/
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.774 Direct costs of processing operations. ( a ) *Items included.* For purposes of § 10.770(b) of this subpart, the words “direct costs of processing operations”, with respect to a good, mean those costs either directly incurred in, or that can be reasonably allocated to, the growth, production, or manufacture of the good in the territory of one or both of the Parties. Such costs include, to the extent they are includable in the appraised value of the good when imported into a Party, the following: ( 1 ) All actual labor costs involved in the growth, production, or manufacture of the specific good, including fringe benefits, on-the-job training, and the costs of engineering, supervisory, quality control, and similar personnel;
( 2 ) Tools, dies, molds, and other indirect materials, and depreciation on machinery and equipment that are allocable to the specific good;
( 3 ) Research, development, design, engineering, and blueprint costs, to the extent that they are allocable to the specific good;
( 4 ) Costs of inspecting and testing the specific good; and
( 5 ) Costs of packaging the specific good for export to the territory of the other Party.
( b ) *Items not included.* For purposes of § 10.770(b) of this subpart, the words “direct costs of processing operations” do not include items that are not directly attributable to the good or are not costs of growth, production, or manufacture of the good. These include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Profit; and
( 2 ) General expenses of doing business that are either not allocable to the good or are not related to the growth, production, or manufacture of the good, such as administrative salaries, casualty and liability insurance, advertising, and salesmen's salaries, commissions, or expenses.
### **CHAPTER 20—EMERGENCY POWERS TO ELIMINATE BUDGET DEFICITS**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—ELIMINATION OF DEFICITS IN EXCESS OF MAXIMUM DEFICIT AMOUNT

Sec.
900.
Statement of budget enforcement through sequestration; definitions.
901.
Enforcing discretionary spending limits.
901a.
Enforcement of budget goal.
902.
Enforcing pay-as-you-go.
903.
Enforcing deficit targets.
904.
Reports and orders.
905.
Exempt programs and activities.
906.
General and special sequestration rules.
907.
The baseline.
907a.
Suspension in event of war or low growth.
907b.
Modification of Presidential order.
907c.
Flexibility among defense programs, projects, and activities.
907d.
Special reconciliation process.
908, 909.
Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—OPERATION AND REVIEW

921.
Transferred.
922.
Judicial review.
### §236b. Existing leases within naval petroleum reserves not affected

Nothing in this act shall be construed as affecting existing leases within the borders of the naval petroleum reserves, or agreements concerning operations thereunder or in relation thereto.

(Aug. 8, 1946, ch. 916, §13, 60 Stat. 958; Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 675.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This act, referred to in text, is act Aug. 8, 1946, ch. 916, 60 Stat. 950, which is classified generally to sections 181, 184, 187a, 187b, 188, 193, 209, 225, 226, 226c to 226e, 236b, and 285 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

1956—Act Aug. 10, 1956, repealed the portion of this section after "thereto" which authorized the Secretary of the Navy, with the consent of the President, to enter into agreements such as those provided for in section 236e of this title, which agreements, should not, unless expressed therein, operate to extend the term of any lease affected thereby.
#### § 1209.3 Application of 5 CFR part 1201.

Except as expressly provided in this part, the Board will apply subparts A, B, C, E, F, and G of 5 CFR part 1201 to appeals and stay requests governed by this part. The Board will apply the provisions of subpart H of part 1201 regarding awards of attorney fees, compensatory damages, and consequential damages under 5 U.S.C. 1221(g) to appeals governed by this part.

[78 FR 39547, July 2, 2013]
Order 2013-6-7

Served: June 10, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 10th of June, 2013

Essential Air Service at

KAMUELA, HAWAII

Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq. 

DOCKET OST-1997-2833

Order Extending Service Obligation

Summary

By this Order, the Department extends the Essential Air Service (EAS) obligation of 

Pacific Wings, LLC., at Kamuela, Hawaii, for an additional 30 days, though August 11, 

2013. 

Background

On March 14, 2013, Pacific Wings filed a 90-day notice of intent to suspend its subsidyfree EAS at Kamuela, Hawaii. Order 2013-4-17, April 25, 2013, prohibited Pacific 

Wings from suspending service through July 12, 2013, consisting of twelve nonstop 

round trips per week to Kahului (OGG), with 9-seat Cessna Caravan aircraft, and 

requested proposals for replacement service. We have received proposals from Pacific 

Wings, Mokulele Airlines, and Makani Kai, and have requested community comments. 

However, we will not have completed the carrier-selection process by July 12, 2013, the 

end of the current 30-day hold in. Therefore, in accordance with 49 U.S.C. § 41734(c), 

we must extend Pacific Wings’s service obligation for an additional 30 days, thru 

August 11, 2013, or until replacement service actually begins, whichever occurs first. 

This Order is issued under authority assigned in 14 CFR Part 385.12(k)(5).

Accordingly, 

1. We require Pacific Wings, LLC., to maintain the level of Essential Air Service it was 

required to provide by Order 2013-4-17, the same level it was providing when it filed notice,

thru August 11, 2013;

2. This docket will remain open until further Order of the Department; and
3. We will serve a copy of this Order on the State of Hawaii, and the civic officials of 

Kamuela, Hawaii, and on Pacific Wings, LLC.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of this Order under the 

Department’s Regulations, 14 CFR Part 385.31(a) must file such petitions within seven 

(7) days after the date of service of this Order.

This Order will be effective immediately, and the filing of a petition for review shall not 

preclude its effectiveness.

By: 

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

(SEAL)

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at

http://www.regulations.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUL-3-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                JUL-3-1999
<CASH>                                           1,824
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,281
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,419
<INVENTORY>                                     26,175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,639
<PP&E>                                          52,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,871
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 176,575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,828
<BONDS>                                         71,982
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            54
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   176,575
<SALES>                                        148,760
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               148,760
<CGS>                                          110,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  138,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (453)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,199
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,255
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,854
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,401
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (281)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,120
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1536 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1536

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat distributions from 
    publicly traded partnerships as qualifying income of regulated 
             investment companies, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 2003

 Mr. Herger (for himself, Mr. Jefferson, Mr. Crane, Mr. Hayworth, Mr. 
   McInnis, Mr. Ramstad, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Becerra, Mr. 
   Houghton, and Mr. Foley) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat distributions from 
    publicly traded partnerships as qualifying income of regulated 
             investment companies, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Publicly Traded Partnership Equity 
Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. DISTRIBUTIONS FROM PUBLICLY TRADED PARTNERSHIPS TREATED AS 
              QUALIFYING INCOME OF REGULATED INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 851(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining regulated investment company) is amended 
by inserting ``distributions or other income derived from an interest 
in a publicly traded partnership (as defined in section 7704(b)),'' 
after ``dividends, interest,''.
    (b) Source Flow-Through Rule Not To Apply.--The last sentence of 
section 851(b) of such Code is amended by inserting ``(other than a 
publicly traded partnership (as defined in section 7704(b)))'' after 
``derived from a partnership''.

SEC. 3. SPECIAL PASSIVE ACTIVITY RULE FOR PUBLICLY TRADED PARTNERSHIPS 
              TO APPLY TO REGULATED INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

    Subsection (k) of section 469 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to separate application of section in case of publicly traded 
partnerships) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(4) Application to regulated investment companies.--For 
        purposes of this section, a regulated investment company (as 
        defined in section 851) holding an interest in a publicly 
        traded partnership shall be treated as a taxpayer described in 
        subsection (a)(2) with respect to items attributable to such 
        interest.''.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply to taxable years 
beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 161.0 Scope.

This part provides general information concerning Customs enforcement of certain import and export laws administered by other federal agencies, the filing of offers in compromise of government claims, the eligibility of individuals for informant compensation, and the filing of claims for informant compensation.

[T.D. 98-22, 63 FR 11826, Mar. 11, 1998]
#### § 171.64 Waiver of statute of limitations.

The deciding Customs official always reserves the right to require a waiver of the statute of limitations executed by the claimants to the property or charged party or parties as a condition precedent before accepting a supplemental petition in any case in which less than one year remains before the statute will be available as a defense to all or part of that case.