alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Luigi Paolucci, as Administrator, etc., of Virgilio Paolucci, Deceased, Appellant, v. Rinehart & Dennis Company, Respondent.

Upon the issues as to any incompetency on the part of the blaster Ferenzo, the verdict for defendant was amply sustained. According to usage in such work, any laborer at hand might be called in to help in tamping the charge, if a helper was required. The case is barren of any evidence that Ferenzo exercised superintendence or control. As the court was announcing the issues to go to the jury, plaintiff’s counsel asked also that Ferenzo’s negligence as a superintendent be submitted. This was declined, as not based on the proof given, in which disposition plaintiff’s counsel acquiesced, making no further request. The record showing no error, the judgment and order are unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-04-045 December 7, 2004

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. TO DISCUSS

ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE LICENSE RENEWAL INSPECTIONS

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will meet with Entergy Operations, Inc.,

management on Tuesday, Dec. 14, in Russellville, Ark., to discuss the results of the agency’s

inspections of the Arkansas Nuclear One license renewal program for Unit 2. The plant, which is

located near Russellville, is operated by Entergy Operations.

The meeting will be held in the Reeves E. Ritchie Training Center Auditorium at the

junction of Hwy. 64 West and Hwy. 333 South from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. It will be open to the

public for observation, and NRC officials will be available for comments and questions from the

public before the meeting adjourns. A report on the inspections will be issued approximately 45

days after the meeting and will be available to the public.

“The meeting will give the NRC the opportunity to discuss the results of its inspection

findings with Entergy officials and answer any questions members of the public may have about

the license renewal process,” NRC Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallet said.

The inspections were conducted to verify that programs are in place to identify and

manage the effects of aging on the plant’s systems, structures and components during the 20

additional years of operation should the NRC approve the license renewal application for Unit 2.

The NRC held a public meeting in Russellville on Nov. 18 to explain how the license

renewal process works and describe opportunities for public participation. The NRC received

the license renewal application for Unit 2 on Oct. 15, 2003. If approved, it would extend the

operating license for Unit 2 to July 17, 2038. NRC has approved an extension of the operating

license for Unit 1 until May 20, 2034.

An electronic copy of the license renewal application is available on the NRC web site at

this address: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/ano-2.html .
-2-

In addition, copies of the license renewal application are available at the Arkansas Technical

University’s library, 305 West Q St., Russellville.

###
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1566-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of South Carolina (FEMA-1566-DR), dated October 7, 2004, and related determinations. 

# Effective Date:

October 11, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective October 11, 2004. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 04-23703 Filed 10-21-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
#### Louis Breckheimer, Respondent, v. John T. Loew, Appellant.

The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings granted, with ten dollars costs, upon authority of *Paul*v. *Fargo*(84 App. Div. 9). Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-41991) pertaining to the MPW IndustrialServices Group, Inc. 1997, 1994 and 1991 Stock Option Plans of our report dated August 12, 2004, except for Note 16, as to which the date is September 30, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of MPW IndustrialServices Group, Inc. as of June 30, 2004 and for each of the two years in the period ended June 30, 2004 included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2005. 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Columbus, Ohio 

September 30, 2005
Issue Date: 05/18/04 - 1 - 04-014

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL IIPB

Change Notice 04-014

DELETED: TRANSMITTED:

Number Date Number Date

1. IMC 0610 06/22/98 IMC 0610 05/18/04

2. TI 2603/001 01/16/96 -------- --------

3. TI 2681/005 05/04/90 -------- --------

4. TI 2681/006 07/10/90 -------- --------

5. TI 2600/003 01/27/99 -------- --------

6. TI 2600/004 01/27/99 -------- --------

7. TI 2600/005 10/12/99 -------- --------

8. TI 2600/006 07/12/00 -------- --------

9. TI 2600/007 08/25/00 -------- --------

TRAINING: No special training requirements have been identified for any documents

issued with this change notice.

REMARKS: IMC 0610 (Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Inspection Reports) This

document is being revised to be a stand alone document for guidance on

preparing inspection reports for NMSS inspections. The previous 0610

includes guidance as used for both reactors and NMSS inspection reports.

NRR has prepared a revised chapter 0612 that includes only reactor

inspections.

DISTRIBUTION: Standard

END
No. 13,402.

#### Garrett *v.*City of Colorado Springs.

(28 P. [2d] 1118)

Decided November 27, 1933.

Rehearing denied January 8, 1934.

Messrs. Strachan & Horn, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Ben S. Wendelken, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed en banc on application for supersedeas without written opinion.
### §505. "Mineral leasing laws" defined

As used in this chapter "mineral leasing laws" shall mean the Act of October 20, 1914 (38 Stat. 741); the Act of February 25, 1920 (41 Stat. 437) [30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.]; the Act of April 17, 1926 (44 Stat. 301) [30 U.S.C. 271 et seq.]; the Act of February 7, 1927 (44 Stat. 1057) [30 U.S.C. 281 et seq.] and all Acts heretofore or hereafter enacted which are amendatory of or supplementary to any of the foregoing Acts.

(Aug. 12, 1953, ch. 405, §5, 67 Stat. 540.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of October 20, 1914, referred to in text, is act Oct. 20, 1914, ch. 330, 38 Stat. 741, known as the Alaska Coal Lands Act, which was repealed by Pub. L. 86–252, §1, Sept. 9, 1959, 73 Stat. 490. The subject matter of this Act is generally covered by subchapters I to VII (§181 et seq.) of chapter 3A of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code prior to repeal, see Tables.

Act of February 25, 1920, referred to in text, is act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which is classified generally to chapter 3A (§181 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 181 of this title and Tables.

Act of April 17, 1926, referred to in text, is act Apr. 17, 1926, ch. 158, 44 Stat. 301, which is classified generally to subchapter VIII (§271 et seq.) of chapter 3A of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

Act of February 7, 1927, referred to in text, is act Feb. 7, 1927, ch. 66, 44 Stat. 1057, which enacted subchapter IX (§281 et seq.) of chapter 3A of this title, amended sections 181 and 193 of this title, and repealed subchapter VII (§141 et seq.) of chapter 3 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
PUBLIC LAW 106–326—OCT. 19, 2000 114 STAT. 1293

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3985:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

July 17, considered and passed House.

Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–326

106th Congress

An Act

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 14900

Southwest 30th Street in Miramar, Florida, as the ‘‘Vicki Coceano Post Office

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

14900 Southwest 30th Street in Miramar, Florida, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Vicki Coceano Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Vicki Coceano

Post Office Building’’.

Approved October 19, 2000.

Oct. 19, 2000

[H.R. 3985]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-04-036 June 2, 2004

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO MEET WITH NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY 

TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE OF PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Nuclear

Management Company on Thursday, June 10, to discuss the results of the agency’s assessment of

safety performance at the Prairie Island Nuclear Power Station during 2003. The facility is located at

Welch, Minnesota.

The meeting will be held at 5 p.m. at the Prairie Island Nuclear Plant Training Center, 1717

Wakonade Drive E., Welch. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be

available before the conclusion of the meeting to answer questions from the public. In addition, the

NRC staff will provide an overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process works.

The NRC concluded that the plant operated safely last year. All NRC inspection findings

during the year were of very low safety significance, and safety performance data indicated no issues

requiring NRC follow-up. The plant’s performance does not require any additional inspections this

year beyond the normal NRC inspection program.

Routine inspections are performed by the two NRC resident inspectors assigned to the plant

and by inspection specialists from Region III office in Lisle, Illinois. 

A March 4 letter from the NRC to Nuclear Management Company officials addresses the

performance of the plant during 2003 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is

available at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/prai_2003q4.pdf

With regard to security issues, the NRC has issued several orders and threat advisories to

enhance security capabilities and improve guard force readiness since the terrorist attacks on

September 11, 2001. The agency has also conducted inspections to review the implementation of these

requirements and has monitored the action of plant operators in response to changing threat conditions. 

The NRC will continue security inspections during 2004.

Current performance indicators and inspection findings for Prairie Island are available on the

NRC web site at: (Unit 1) http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/PRAI1/prai1_chart.html

and (Unit 2) http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/PRAI2/prai2_chart.html .

###
#### Robert W. Robinson, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Close, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
  Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 
 As
Adopted Pursuant to
 
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Imagin Molecular Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Corey N.
Conn, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:
  (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
  (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 Dated: April
      15, 2009
                  /s/ Corey N. ConnCorey
      N. ConnChief
      Financial Officer
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Imagin Molecular Corporation and will be retained by Positron Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MPW
INDUSTRIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             318
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,901
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,157
<INVENTORY>                                      9,044
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,439
<PP&E>                                          75,024
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,595
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,166
<BONDS>                                         65,475
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,458
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,250
<SALES>                                        147,197
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,197
<CGS>                                           99,113
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  132,262
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   489
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,448
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,487
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,595
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,892
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,892
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60


</TABLE>
### §§84, 84–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §204(30), (31), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1734

Section 84, act Oct. 1, 1890, ch. 1256, §7, 26 Stat. 646, related to statement of disbursements by Sergeant at Arms.

Section 84–1, based on H. Res. No. 6, Ninety-eighth Congress, Jan. 3, 1983, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 98–51, title I, §110, July 14, 1983, 97 Stat. 269, fixed compensation of Postmaster of House of Representatives.

A prior section 84–1, based on H. Res. No. 393, §3, Ninety-fifth Congress, Mar. 31, 1977, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 95–94, title I, §115, Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 668, provided that per annum gross rate of compensation of Postmaster was to equal amount for level 13, step 5, of House Employees Schedule.

Another prior section 84–1, acts Aug. 5, 1955, ch. 568, §5, 69 Stat. 508; Dec. 16, 1967, Pub. L. 90–206, title II, §214(b), 81 Stat. 635, set forth compensation of Postmaster.
<PAGE>

                           APEX MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.

                    SECOND AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT


     This Second Amendment to the Management Agreement between APEX MORTGAGE
CAPITAL, INC., a Maryland corporation (the "COMPANY"), and TCW INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT COMPANY, a California corporation (the "MANAGER") executed
December 9, 1997 is entered into as of December 16, 1999 by the Company and
the Manager pursuant to section 26 of the Management Agreement.

     The Management Agreement is amended as follows:

          1.4 "AVERAGE NET INVESTED CAPITAL" means the month end sum of (1) the
          Company's total shareholders' equity computed in accordance with
          generally accepted accounting principles plus (2) any unsecured debt
          that has been approved for inclusion by the Unaffiliated Directors at
          issuance plus or minus (3) an adjustment to exclude the impact of any
          unrealized gains, losses or other items that do not affect realized
          net income.

          A new section is added:

          3.3 DELEGATION. Manager may appoint an Affiliate investment adviser to
          perform, on Manager's behalf, any and all of the services to be
          performed by Manager hereunder. No additional compensation shall be
          charged the Company for the services of the Affiliate investment
          adviser.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Second Amendment to
the Management Agreement as of the effective date.

                                       APEX MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.


                                       By: /s/  Daniel K. Osborne
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Daniel K. Osborne
                                           Executive Vice President

                                       TCW INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY


                                       By: /s/  Alvin R. Albe, Jr.
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Alvin R. Albe, Jr.
                                           President
Exhibit 10.12 - Assignment - Brett Abrams


                                   ASSIGNMENT

     WHEREAS, Nathaniel, Ltd. Is the sole owner, by assignment,. of the Letters
Patents 01 the United states of America as Identified on the EXHIBIT attached
hereto, and

     WHEREAS, Stan E. Abrams, a citizen of the United States of America and
resident at 4871 N. Mesa Drive, Castle Rock, CO 80104, Is desirous of acquiring
the entire right, title and interest in and to the same:

     NOW, THEREFORE, to all whom it may concern, be it known that for and In
consideration Of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) paid and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt of which Is hereby acknowledged, Nathaniel, Ltd. has
sold, assigned, transferred and set over, and by these presents does sell}
assign, transfer and set over, unto the said Stan E. Abrams, the Letters Patents
as listed on the attached EXHIBIT; the same to be held and enjoyed by the said
Stan E. Abrams, Its successors, assigns or other legal representatives, for its
own use, and for the use 01 Its successors, assigns or other legal-
representatives, to the end of the term or terms for Which said Letters Patents
are granted or may be reissued, as fully and entirely as the same would have
been held and enjoyed by said Nathaniel, Ltd. had this assignment and sale not
been made.

     IN TESTIMONY WHEREAS, Nathaniel, Ltd. has caused its corporate seal to be
impressed hereon and the hands of its proper officers to be subscribed hereto
this _24th _day of _April_, 2002.

(Co. Seal)

                                             Nathaniel, Ltd,

                              By:         /s/______________
                              Name:          Brett Abrams
                              Company Title: Secretary B.A.

Attest:
______________
Secretary

State of  _Colorado_
County of _Douglas_

On this _24th_ day of _April_, 2002, before me personally came Brett Abrams, to
me known, and known to me to be the President of Nathaniel, Ltd., the assignor
above-named and acknowledged that he executed the foregoing instrument on behalf
of said assignor and pursuant to authority duly received.


     _/s/_LINDA A. MYERS_____
          NOTARY PUBLIC

     My Commission Expires _11/07/02_