alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1620.21 Contributions. ( a ) An individual covered under this subpart can make contributions to the TSP from basic pay in the amount described at 5 CFR 1600.22(a)(1). Unless stated otherwise in this subpart, he or she is covered by the same rules that apply to a CSRS participant in the TSP.
( b ) The following amounts are not basic pay and no TSP contributions can be made from them: ( 1 ) An annuity or salary received by a justice or judge of the United States (as defined in 28 U.S.C. 451) who is retired under 28 U.S.C. 371(a) or (b), or 372(a);
( 2 ) Amounts received by a bankruptcy judge or a United States magistrate judge under a judges' annuity described at 28 U.S.C. 377;
( 3 ) An annuity or salary received by a judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims under 28 U.S.C. 178; and
( 4 ) Retired pay received by a judge of the United States Court of Veterans Appeals under 38 U.S.C. 7296.
[64 FR 31057, June 9, 1999, as amended at 70 FR 32213, June 1, 2005]
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EXE Technologies,
Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Joseph L. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Kenneth R. Vines, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that [to his knowledge]:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | /s/ JOSEPH L. COWAN    
|                      |  |                        
|Dated: March 31, 2003 |  | Joseph L. Cowan        
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  |                        
|                      |  | /s/ KENNETH R. VINES   
|                      |  |                        
|Dated: March 31, 2003 |  | Kenneth R. Vines       
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### Francis J. Lyons, as Administrator of the Estate of Neil M. Lyons, Deceased, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 28243.)

Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCum, Love, Kimball and Piper, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 1086.]
#### § 1620.2 Definitions.

The definitions generally applicable to the Thrift Savings Plan are set forth at 5 CFR 1690.1.

[70 FR 32213, June 1, 2005]
#### § 190.34 Transfer of merchandise.

Any transfer of merchandise (*see* § 190.10) must be recorded in records, which may include records kept in the normal course of business, as defined in § 190.2.
### §1297. Separability

If any provision of this chapter or the applicability thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the remainder of this chapter and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(Pub. L. 95–87, title VII, §707, Aug. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 521.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,288
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,288
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,900
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,776
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,788
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (24,808)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (24,808)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (24,808)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 208.1 Applicability of part.

Part 208 applies to proceedings of the Commission under sections 321-324 of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) Implementation Act, 19 U.S.C. 4571-4574 (19 U.S.C. 4501 note).
§ 192.13 Revocation of participants' AES post-departure (Option 4) filing privileges; appeal procedures. ( a ) *Reasons for revocation.* Customs may revoke Option 4 privileges of participants for the following reasons: ( 1 ) The exporter has made or caused to be made in the “Letter of Intent”, a false or misleading statement or omission with respect to any material fact;
( 2 ) The exporter submitting the “Letter of Intent” is indicted, convicted, or is currently under an investigation, wherein Customs has developed probable cause, for a felony involving any Customs law or any export law administered by another government agency;
( 3 ) The exporter fails to substantially comply with export regulations; or
( 4 ) Continued participation in AES as an Option 4 filer would pose a threat to national security, such that continued participation in Option 4 should be terminated.
( b ) *Notice of revocation; appeal procedures.* When Customs has decided to revoke a participant's Option 4 filing privileges, the participant will be notified in writing of the reason(s) for the decision. The participant may challenge Customs decision by filing an appeal within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the notice of decision. Except as stated elsewhere in this paragraph, the revocation will become effective when the participant has either exhausted all appeal proceedings or thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the notice of revocation if no appeal is filed. However, in cases of intentional violations of any Customs law on the part of the program participant or when required by the national security, revocations will become effective immediately upon notification. Appeals should be addressed to the Director, Outbound Programs, U.S. Customs, Ronald Reagan Building, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Room 5.4c, Washington, DC 20229. Customs will issue a written decision or notice of extension to the participant within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the appeal. If a notice of extension is forwarded, the applicant will be provided with the reason(s) for extension of this time period and an expected date of decision. Participants who have had their Option 4 filing privileges revoked and applicants not selected to participate in Option 4 of AES may not reapply for this filing status for one year following written notification of rejection or revocation.
#### Decker *vs.*Decker's Administratrix.

The Court of Chancery will only assume jurisdiction over the settlement ■of intestate’s estates, for cause.

Bill for relief.

The Chahcellor.

The bill is filed by a creditor of the estate .of Madison Decker, deceased, late of the county of Sussex, against his ■administratrix, for a settlement of the estate in this court. It alleges that, after letters of administration were issued to her, the defendant filed her inventory according to law; that out ■of the personal estate, she received, as widow of the intestate, property to the value of $200, in pursuance of the provision of the *statute;*that there remained in her hands to be administered less than $100 of the personal *estate;*that the intestate .died seized of a lot of land in Sussex county; that there are *240debts amounting in the aggregate to a considerable sum, du© from the estate; that the defendant, soon after receiving letters of administration, removed out of the county of Sussex, so that the creditors have had no opportunity to present t©> her their claims or demands against the estate, and that she-has done nothing, except as above mentioned, towards the settlement of the estate, or in discharge of her duty as administratrix. It prays that an account may be taken of the personal estate, and of the claims of the creditors, and that they may be paid out of the personal estate, and that if that be insufficient for the purpose, the real estate may be sold and the proceeds applied thereto.

It is quite enough to say that the bill shows no reason for drawing the settlement of the estate into this court. It does not even appear by it or by the evidence, that the administratrix left this state. For aught that appears by either, she merely removed out of the county of Sussex into another county in this state. But however that may be, the complainant has an adequate remedy at law under every aspect of the bill. The bill will, therefore, be dismissed.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-122 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, July 16, 1998)

NRC INCREASES INSURANCE ASSESSMENT FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

BASED ON INFLATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, effective August 20, will

increase to $83.9 million, from $75.5 million, the maximum amount

nuclear utilities would be assessed per licensed reactor in case

a severe accident resulted in public liability claims exceeding

$200 million.

The law requires that such a figure, known as the

retrospective deferred premium, be adjusted for inflation at

least once every five years in accordance with the Labor

Department’s Consumer Price Index. The last such increase

occurred in August 1993.

Under the Price-Anderson Act, nuclear utilities are required

to provide financial protection for public liability, using a

two-layer insurance system. The first layer consists of the

maximum amount available for each power reactor site from the

private insurance market, currently $200 million.

The second layer consists of funds made available through an

assessment on each licensed reactor of a prorated share of the

rest of the claims, up to $83.9 million. The increase in this

individual retrospective premium, that takes effect shortly, will

make approximately $9 billion available to pay public liability

claims in the event of a severe accident.

The law also provides that, of the $83.9 million, the

maximum amount a utility can be assessed in a calendar year is

$10 million per reactor per incident. This limit remains in

effect.

A notice amending NRC’s regulations to specify the new $83.9

million retrospective deferred premium will be published shortly

in the Federal Register.

###
#### § 146.9 Permission of operator.

An application for permission to admit merchandise into a zone, or to manipulate, manufacture, exhibit, or destroy merchandise in a zone must include the written concurrence of the operator, except where the regulations of this part provide for the making of application by the operator itself or where the operator files a separate specific or blanket application. The written concurrence of the operator in the removal of merchandise from a zone is not required because the merchandise is released by the port director to the operator for delivery from the zone, as provided in § 146.71 (a).
§ 144.15 Entry and withdrawal from Customs bonded warehouses of distilled spirits. ( a ) *Distilled spirits entered in warehouse under section 5066(a), Internal Revenue Code* — ( 1 ) *General rule.* Except as otherwise provided in this section, distilled spirits entered into Customs bonded warehouse in accordance with section 5066(a), Internal Revenue Code, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5066(a)), shall be treated in the same manner as any other merchandise entered for warehouse.
( 2 ) *Withdrawal from warehouse for domestic consumption.* Distilled spirits entered in warehouse under this paragraph may be withdrawn from warehouse for domestic consumption under section 5066(c), Internal Revenue Code, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5066(c)). In this case, the distilled spirits shall be subject to duty as American goods exported and returned under subheading 9801.00.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202).
( b ) *Distilled spirits transferred from a manufacturing warehouse to a storage warehouse under section 311, Tariff Act of 1930* — ( 1 ) *Prohibition on withdrawal from warehouse for domestic consumption.* Domestic distilled spirits which have been transferred from a Customs bonded manufacturing warehouse, Class 6, to a Customs bonded storage warehouse, Class 2 or 3, in accordance with section 311, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1311), may not be withdrawn under section 5066(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5066(c)), for domestic consumption.
( 2 ) *Procedure governing transfer of distilled spirits from manufacturing warehouse to storage warehouse.* For procedure concerning the transfer of such distilled spirits from Customs bonded manufacturing warehouse, Class 6, to Customs bonded storage warehouse, see § 19.15(g)(2) of this chapter.
( c ) *Distilled spirits entered under section 5214(a)(9), Internal Revenue Code* — ( 1 ) *General rule.* Distilled spirits may be entered into a Customs bonded storage warehouse under section 5214(a)(9), Internal Revenue Code, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5214(a)(9)), in the same manner as any other merchandise is entered for warehouse, unless otherwise provided in this section.
( 2 ) *Withdrawal only for exportation.* Distilled spirits warehoused under section 5214(a)(9), Internal Revenue Code, may be withdrawn only for the purpose of exportation, either directly or after rewarehousing at the same or another port. The distilled spirits may not be withdrawn for domestic consumption.
[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17464, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 78-298, 43 FR 38382, Aug. 28, 1978; T.D. 80-271, 45 FR 75641, Nov. 17, 1980; T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41185, Oct. 19, 1984; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51263, Dec. 21, 1988]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

 ‘ 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-4005

No. IV-03-014 April 1, 2003

CONTACT: Victor Dricks E-mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

 

 NRC TO MEET WITH TXU GENERATION MANAGEMENT CO. TO DISCUSS

 PERFORMANCE OF COMANCHE PEAK 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of TXU Generation

Management Co. on Tuesday, April 8, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual assessment of

safety performance at the Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station. The facility, which includes two

operating reactors, is located near Glen Rose, TX, and operated by TXU. 

 The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 7:00

p.m. at the Somerville County Expo Center, 202 Bo Gibbs Blvd., Glen Rose, TX.

Before the session is adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the

public on the safety performance of the plant, as well as the role of the NRC in ensuring safe plant

operation.

 The performance period to be discussed is January 1 to December 31, 2002. In addition, NRC

staff will provide an overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process works.

 A letter sent from the NRC Region IV Office to representatives of TXU, addresses the

performance of the plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is

available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/cp_2002q4.pdf

“Overall, Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station operated in a manner that preserved public

health and safety and fully met all cornerstone objectives,” the letter says. 

In addition, the letter notes: “As you are aware, since the terrorist attacks on September 11,

2001, the NRC has issued several Orders and threat advisories to enhance security capabilities and

improve guard force readiness. We have conducted inspections to review your implementation of

these requirements and have monitored your actions in response to changing threat conditions. For

calendar year 2003, we plan to continue these inspections and conduct portions of the security baseline

inspection program, as well as perform additional inspections to evaluate your compliance with new

requirements that may be ordered.”

Current performance information for Comanche Peak Unit 1 is available on the NRC web site

at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CP1/cp1_chart.html
Current performance information for Unit 2 is available at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CP2/cp2_chart.html

###
§ 1601.1 Definitions. ( a ) Definitions generally applicable to the Thrift Savings Plan are set forth at 5 CFR 1690.1.
( b ) As used in this part:
*Acknowledgment of risk* means an acknowledgment that any investment in a TSP core fund other than the G Fund is made at the participant's risk, that the participant is not protected by the United States Government or the Board against any loss on the investment, and that neither the United States Government nor the Board guarantees any return on the investment.
*Fund reallocation* means the total redistribution of a participant's existing account balance among the TSP core funds.
*Fund transfer* means either: ( i ) The transfer of money from one or more TSP core fund(s) to another TSP core fund(s); or
( ii ) The transfer of money from the TSP core funds to the mutual fund window (and vice versa).
[68 FR 35495, June 13, 2003, as amended at 70 FR 32207, June 1, 2005; 87 FR 31673, May 24, 2022]
### §1555. "Federal mandate" defined

Notwithstanding section 1502 of this title, for purposes of this subchapter the term "Federal mandate" means any provision in statute or regulation or any Federal court ruling that imposes an enforceable duty upon State, local, or tribal governments including a condition of Federal assistance or a duty arising from participation in a voluntary Federal program.

(Pub. L. 104–4, title III, §305, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 70.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              92
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                       246
<INVENTORY>                                      2,829
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,002
<PP&E>                                           1,821
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,393
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,985
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,614
<SALES>                                         12,250
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,250
<CGS>                                            8,071
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,071
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,207
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 457
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,515
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,515
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,515
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        





</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED,

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Multimedia Games, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Clifton E. Lind, Chief Executive Officer, and Craig S. Nouis, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that, based upon each of their respective knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 10, 2006 |  | /s/ Clifton E. Lind    
|                   |  | Clifton E. Lind        
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ Craig S. Nouis     
|                   |  | Craig S. Nouis         
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
For reasons of economy, this document is printed in a limited number. Delegates are 

kindly asked to bring their copies to meetings and not to request additional copies.

I:\MEPC\57\2-1-Corr-1.doc 

INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION

IMO 

E

MARINE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION 

COMMITTEE 

57th session 

Agenda item 2 

MEPC 57/2/1/Corr.1

12 March 2008

 ENGLISH ONLY 

HARMFUL AQUATIC ORGANISMS IN BALLAST WATER 

Application for Final Approval of a ballast water management system using 

Active Substances (Electro-Clean Electrolytic Disinfection) 

Submitted by the Republic of Korea

Corrigendum 

 In the English version of document MEPC 57/2/1, the table in paragraph 5.2.5.2 of the 

annex is deleted. 

_____________