alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1404

To direct the Secretary of Defense to present a ribbon of appropriate design 

to all persons who, while a member of the Armed Forces serving on 

active duty, were exposed to ionizing radiation as a result of participation 

in a test of atomic weapons. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2003

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Defense to present a ribbon of 

appropriate design to all persons who, while a member 

of the Armed Forces serving on active duty, were exposed 

to ionizing radiation as a result of participation in a 

test of atomic weapons.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Atomic Test Veterans 

5 Recognition Act’’. 
2

•HR 1404 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ATOMIC TESTING RECOGNITION RIBBON. 

2 (a) DESIGN OF RIBBON.—The Secretary of Defense 

3 shall design and produce a ribbon, to be known as the 

4 ‘‘Atomic Testing Recognition Ribbon’’, to honor all mili5 tary veterans who were exposed to ionizing radiation as 

6 a result of atomic weapons tests conducted by the United 

7 States between 1945 and 1963. 

8 (b) DISTRIBUTION OF RIBBON.—The Secretary of 

9 Defense shall issue the Atomic Testing Recognition Rib10 bon to each person who, while a member of the Armed 

11 Forces serving on active duty, was exposed to ionizing ra12 diation as a result of atomic weapons testing conducted 

13 by the United States between 1945 and 1963. In the case 

14 of any such person who is deceased, the ribbon shall be 

15 issued to the next-of-kin of such person

Æ
### [§1493. Repealed. July 28, 1953, ch. 253, §8, 67 Stat. 226]

Section, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 941, authorized Court of Claims to give legal advice to heads of executive departments in matters referred to it by the heads, if Court had jurisdiction over the matters.
§ 200.735-111 Gambling, betting, and lotteries. An employee shall not participate, while on Government-owned or leased property or while on duty for the Government, in any gambling activity including the operation of a gambling device, in conducting a lottery or pool, in a game for money or property, or in selling or purchasing a numbers slip or ticket. However, this section does not preclude activities: ( a ) Necessitated by an employee's law enforcement duties; or
( b ) Under section 3 of Executive Order 10927 and similar Commission-approved activities.
July 9, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

GARY WAYNE BRYAN, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00424-CR V. 

NO. 14-12-00425-CR 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

These causes were heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgments. The Court orders the judgments AFFIRMED, and that this decision 

be certified below for observance.
## August 30, 2008

Dear Owner/Resident:

A Lead Based Paint (LBP) assessment was recently performed on your property by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as part of the Omaha Lead Superfund Site investigation. The purpose of this assessment is to determine whether a significant quantity of lead based paint is present on the exterior surface of structures, where deteriorating paint conditions (peeling, flaking, cracking, etc.) exist that might increase lead concentrations in the yard above acceptable levels.

As requested, enclosed are the LBP assessment sheets for 4170 CHICAGO ST along with a LBP Fact Sheet. The EPA is currently developing paint stabilization eligibility criteria and at this time can not identify which homes will ultimately be eligible for EPA-funded paint stabilization. At present, paint stabilization is being offered at only those households with the most severe LPB problems, particularly where children under the age of 7 reside. The EPA stresses the importance of maintaining painted surfaces where any amount of LBP is present. The LBP Fact Sheet provides information pertaining to the EPA’s Exterior LBP Response Program. Once the eligibility criterion is finalized (and if your property qualifies) a representative from EPA or the Omaha Lead Hazard Control Program (LHCP) will contact you to arrange for paint stabilization at your property.

Exposure to lead contamination can adversely affect the development and behavior of young children. If you have children less than seven years of age living in your home, we strongly recommend that you contact your doctor or the Douglas County Health Department at (402) 444-7825 and arrange to have their blood tested.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the EPA Public Information Center at (402) 731-3045.

Sincerely,

Steve M Langum

Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp. 6601 College Blvd. Overland Park, KS 66211 USA Telephone: 913-458-2900I 

### Omaha Lead Site
Address4170 CHICAGO ST 

### Site Sketch 

# *rW

LBP Assessment ALT: Phone: H:

I 1 Plan View 

# - lndicate number of stories and perimeter dimensions of structure Indicate regions of deterioration and describe (Deterioration could include surfaces that are worn due to friction, checking, cracking and flaking, alligatoring, blistering and/or peeling)

### Omaha Lead Site 

### LBP Assessment

LEGEND: H 

# - N 

# - P 

# - 01 

# - 23649 Samples Analyzed 

# I I L-BVID Number 

# j j L---.Sample Number XRF unit: 

# 2 ~ook: 

# IS\

1 ,--Material: P = Paint Date: 

## 6+m6 Time: JoL~ide of Structure: N = North S = South E = East W = West 

# / Staff: 

### $fllo@ 

## PI^< L-..Structure Type: H = House G = Garage S = Shed F = Fence Sample Number Lead Loading StructureIFeature (LWindow, siding, porch, etc.)
## NO. 12

- 24

- 00092

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

DWIGHT CALLIER AND

FRAN CALLIER

, APPELLANT S

V.

NEW DOOR PROPERTIES, LLC

, APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT AT LAW

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellants Dw ight Callier and Fran Callier fi led a n unoppo sed motion to dismiss this

appeal

. T he moti on to dismi ss is grant ed , and the appeal is dismissed

. Se e T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42. 1 (a). C osts are taxed against the party i n curring same

.

Opinion delivered May 31, 2024

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MAY 31 , 2024

NO. 12

- 24

- 00092

- C V

DWIGHT CALLIER AND FRA N CALLIER

, Appellant s

V.

NEW DOOR PROPERTIES, LLC

, Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law

o f Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 76481 )

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the unopposed motion of the

Appellant s to dismiss the app eal herein, and the same being consider ed, it i s he reby ORDER ED,

ADJUDGE D and DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismis s b e granted and the appeal

be dismissed

, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance. Costs are

taxed ag ainst the party incurring same.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J
#### § 362.102 Definitions.

For purposes of this part:

*Act* means the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1202 *et seq.*).

*Applicable Entries* means the entries of Southeast Asian-Completed Cells and Modules that are entered into the United States, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption before the Date of Termination and, for entries that enter after November 15, 2022, are used in the United States by the Utilization Expiration Date.

*CBP* means U.S. Customs and Border Protection of the United States Department of Homeland Security.

*Certain Solar Orders* means Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules from the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, and Antidumping Duty Order; Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People's Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order; and Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from Taiwan: Antidumping Duty Order.

*Date of Termination* means June 6, 2024, or the date the emergency described in Presidential Proclamation 10414 has been terminated, whichever occurs first.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of Commerce or a designee.

*Solar Circumvention Inquiries* means some or all of the inquiries at issue in Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry on the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders.

*Southeast Asian-Completed Cells and Modules* means crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules (solar cells and modules), which are completed in the Kingdom of Cambodia, Malaysia, the Kingdom of Thailand, or the Socialist Republic of Vietnam using parts and components manufactured in the People's Republic of China, and subsequently exported from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand or Vietnam to the United States. These are cells and modules subject to the Solar Circumvention Inquiries. Southeast Asian-Completed Cells and Modules does not mean solar cells and modules that, on June 6, 2022, the date Proclamation 10414 was signed, were already subject to Certain Solar Orders.

*Utilization* and *utilized* means the Southeast Asian-Completed Cells and Modules will be used or installed in the United States. Merchandise which remains in inventory or a warehouse in the United States, is resold to another party, is subsequently exported, or is destroyed after importation is not considered utilized for purposes of these provisions.

*Utilization Expiration Date* means the date 180 days after the Date of Termination.
Rev 0 (9/08)

Comments in Response to 

“Final rule; request for comments”

Docket: FAA-2011-1163 Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-022-AD

Comments have been received in response to: “Final rule; request for comments,”

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above. 

(Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted.

Once you have made your determination, please fill in the commenter(s) name(s) and check the 

appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, 

if necessary. Then include your name and the date in the spaces provided, and return it to the 

AD directorate focal.

The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we received from: 

Neos SPA, Jet Aviation St Louis, AMAC Aerospace

(Please check one)

 These comments have not been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration 

or change of this AD.

 These comments have been found to contain information that warrants consideration of 

additional regulatory action. (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual 

FAA-IR-M-8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.)

______Jeffrey Lee_____ 1/4/2012__

Name: Date:

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.)
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
 Barbeques Galore Limited:

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(No. 333-46529) on Form S-8 of Barbeques Galore Limited of our report dated
March 10, 2000 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Barbeques Galore
Limited and subsidiaries as of January 31, 2000 and 1999 and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the
years ended January 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, which report appears in the
January 31, 2000 annual report on Form 20-F of Barbeques Galore Limited.

/s/ KPMG
KPMG
April 10, 2000
Sydney, Australia
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Rogelio LOPEZ-VILLAGOMEZ, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-10585.

D.C. No. CR-00-00393-PMP.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 28, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rogelio Lopez-Villagomez appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for unlawful reentry of a deported alien after conviction for an aggravated felony in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Lopez-Villagomez contends that, in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), his sentence should not have exceeded the maximum two-year sentence pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Lopez-Villagomez acknowledges that this argument is foreclos*659ed by *United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda,*234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), *cert. denied,*532 U.S. 966, 121 S.Ct. 1503, 149 L.Ed.2d 388 (2001), and states that he raises the contention merely to preserve it in the event of ensuing favorable Supreme Court precedent. Thus, we do not consider it further.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
§ 10400.14 Restrictions on charging fees. ( a ) No search fees will be charged for requests by educational institutions (unless the records are sought for a commercial use), noncommercial scientific institutions, or representatives of the news media.
( b ) If IPEC fails to comply with the FOIA's time limits in which to respond to a request, it may not charge search fees, or, in the instances of requests from requesters described in § 10400.13(b)(2) and (3), may not charge duplication fees, except as described in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section.
( c ) If IPEC determines that unusual circumstances as defined by the FOIA apply and the agency provided timely written notice to the requester in accordance with the FOIA, a failure to comply with the time limit shall be excused for an additional 10 days.
( d ) If IPEC determines that unusual circumstances as defined by the FOIA apply, and more than 5,000 pages are necessary to respond to the request, the agency may charge search fees, or, in the case of requesters described in § 10400.13(b)(2) and (3), may charge duplication fees if the following steps are taken. IPEC must have provided timely written notice of unusual circumstances to the requester in accordance with the FOIA and the agency must have discussed with the requester via written mail, email, or telephone (or made not less than three good-faith attempts to do so) how the requester could effectively limit the scope of the request in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(B)(ii). If this exception is satisfied, IPEC may charge all applicable fees incurred in the processing of the request.
( e ) If a court has determined that exceptional circumstances exist as defined by the FOIA, a failure to comply with the time limits shall be excused for the length of time provided by the court order.
( f ) No search or review fees will be charged for a quarter-hour period unless more than half of that period is required for search or review.
( g ) When, after first deducting the 100 free pages (or its cost equivalent) and the first two hours of search, a total fee calculated under paragraph (c) of this section is $25.00 or less for any request, no fee will be charged.
### **CHAPTER 12A—ENTRY AND LOCATION ON COAL LANDS ON DISCOVERY OF SOURCE MATERIAL**

Sec.
541.
Entry and location; filing of copy of notice of mining location; report and payment for lignite mined; mineral patents; reservation of minerals to United States.
541a.
Claims located prior to May 25, 1955; extralateral rights; amended notice of mining location.
541b.
Mining, removal, and disposal of lignite.
541c.
Lands where coal deposits have been reserved to the United States.
541d.
Location of source materials by holders of coal leases.
541e.
Definitions.
541f.
Disbursement of moneys.
541g.
Rules and regulations.
541h.
Savings provisions.
541i.
Withdrawal of lands from entry; expiration of claims.
### §2049. Loans for Senate Restaurants

#### (a) Borrowing authority

Subject to the approval of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration, the Architect of the Capitol shall have authority to borrow (and be accountable for), from time to time, from the appropriation account, within the contingent fund of the Senate, for "Miscellaneous Items", such amount as he may determine necessary to carry out the provisions of the joint resolution entitled "Joint Resolution transferring the management of the Senate Restaurants to the Architect of the Capitol, and for other purposes", approved July 6, 1961, as amended (40 U.S.C. 174j–1 through 174j–8) [2 U.S.C. 2042 et seq.],1 and resolutions of the Senate amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto.

#### (b) Amount and period of loan; voucher

Any such loan authorized pursuant to subsection (a) of this section shall be for such amount and for such period as the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration shall prescribe, and shall be made by the Secretary of the Senate to the Architect of the Capitol upon a voucher approved by the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration.

#### (c) Deposit, credit, and future availability of proceeds from repayment

All proceeds from the repayment of any such loan shall be deposited in the appropriation account, within the contingent fund of the Senate, for "Miscellaneous Items", shall be credited to the fiscal year during which such loan was made, and shall thereafter be available for the same purposes for which the amount loaned was initially appropriated.

(Pub. L. 98–396, title I, Aug. 22, 1984, 98 Stat. 1395.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Joint Resolution entitled "Joint Resolution transferring the management of the Senate Restaurants to the Architect of the Capitol, and for other purposes", approved July 6, 1961, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 87–82, July 6, 1961, 75 Stat. 199, which enacted sections 174j–1 to 174j–7 of former Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works. Sections 174j–1 and 174j–3 to 174j–7 of former Title 40 were transferred to sections 2042 and 2043 to 2047 of this title, respectively. Section 174j–2 of former Title 40 was repealed by Pub. L. 107–217, §6(b), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1304. Section 174j–8 of former Title 40, which was not enacted by Pub. L. 87–82, was transferred to section 2048 of this title and subsequently repealed. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 174j–9 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

1 See References in Text note below.
1

EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V

District Name Placer County APCD

Submittal Date July 15, 2015

Date Reviewed August 3, 2015

EPA Reviewer Arnold Lazarus

Key:

C = Complete

I = Incomplete

N/A = Not Applicable To Rule

O = Material Missing

N/S = None Submitted

 

RULE : Ozone Emergency Episode Plan

Adopted Date of Rule: 6/11/2015

Effective Date of Rule: (If different from Adopted Date, 

please state where found.)

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee C

(b) Evidence of adoption C

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt C

(d1) Copy of actual rule/plan C

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out N/A

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements C

(f) Copy of public notice C

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice C

(h) Public comments & agency response N/S

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified C

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified C

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact C

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration C

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions N/A

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements N/A

(h) Compliance/enforcement strategies N/A

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A

OVERALL COMPLETENESS C

Notes: Effective Date is same as Adopted Date verified by Phone Call to District.
.libname{    FONT-SIZE: 14pt;	FONT-WEIGHT: bold;    COLOR: #000000;    FONT-FAMILY: Arial, sans-serif;}.libcategory{    FONT-SIZE: 10pt;	FONT-WEIGHT: bold;    COLOR: #000000;    FONT-FAMILY: Arial, sans-serif;}.libtext{    FONT-SIZE: 10pt;    COLOR: #000000;    FONT-FAMILY: Arial, sans-serif;}
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2384]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Communication Disorders Review Committee, 
Communication Disorders Review Committee.
    Date: February 18-19, 2004.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Melissa J. Stick, PhD, MPH, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research, NIDCD/NIH, 6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-
496-8683.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

    Dated: January 29, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-2384 Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 205.5 Applicability of subpart.

This subpart B of part 205 applies to investigations for the purpose of section 301(e)(3) of the Trade Act of 1974. For other applicable rules, see part 201 of this chapter.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 17

- 00372

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S .R., A CHILD

From the County Court at Law

Bosque County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV16242

ORDER

The “Appellant’s Brief and Appendix,” filed on March 2, 2018, is stricken.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis , and

Justice Scoggins

Order issued and filed March 28, 2018
COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 2

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 83-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/23/2021 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 83-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/23/2021 Page 2 of 2