alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

     Each person whose signature appears below authorizes Paul R. Skubic,
Chairman of the Board and President, to execute in the name of each such person
who is then an officer or director of the registrant, and to file, the 2005
Harris Preferred Capital Corporation Annual Report to the Securities and
Exchange Commission on Form 10-K pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.

     /s/ David Blockowicz           /s/ Delbert Wacker
     ------------------------       -------------------------
     David Blockowicz               Delbert Wacker
     Director                       Director

     /s/ Frank M. Novosel           /s/ Forrest M. Schneider
     ----------------------         -----------------------------
     Frank M. Novosel               Forrest M. Schneider
     Director                       Director

     /s/ Paul R. Skubic
     -------------------------
     Paul R. Skubic
     Director
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-03-041 July 1, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan 610/337-5331

NRC PROPOSES $3,000 FINE AGAINST WASHINGTON, D.C. HOSPITAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has cited Howard University Hospital in

Washington, D.C., for a violation involving a personnel contamination at the facility. The NRC has

proposed a $3,000 fine. 

On March 18-19 and April 10, an NRC inspector conducted a safety inspection at the

hospital. In the course of that review, the inspector performed a confirmatory radiological survey

in areas where licensed nuclear medicine materials are used. This survey was performed after

hospital employees had already completed their own end-of-day survey. The NRC inspector

discovered eight areas of contamination, which created the potential for radiological exposure to

patients, workers and others above regulatory limits. The inspector also determined there were

deficiencies in the way the hospital’s surveys were conducted. Subsequent surveys by the hospital’s

radiation safety staff also found areas of contamination.

A predecisional enforcement conference was held on June 4 to discuss the inspection

findings, the violation, its causes and the hospital’s corrective actions. 

Based on the information developed during the conference, the inspection and in an April 23

letter, the NRC has determined that one violation of NRC requirements occurred. 

In a letter to the hospital forwarding the notice of violation, Region I Administrator Hubert

J. Miller wrote that the violation is of concern because “the failure to conduct appropriate surveys

of radioactive material resulted in a missed opportunity to identify contamination in your facilities

and of one of your employees. If undetected, this contamination could have resulted in substantial

unintended radiation dose to the individual.”
- 2 -

The NRC also noted in the letter that Howard University Hospital had taken prompt and

comprehensive corrective action including obtaining appropriate equipment and supplies for

technologists and training nuclear medicine technologists.

Howard University Hospital has 30 days to respond to the notice of violation. 

###
§ 1201.74 Orders for discovery. ( a ) *Motion for an order compelling discovery.* Motions for orders compelling discovery and motions for the appearance of nonparties must be filed with the judge in accordance with § 1201.73(c)(1) and (d)(3). An administrative judge may deny a motion to compel discovery if a party fails to comply with the requirements of 5 CFR 1201.73(c)(1) and (d)(3).
( b ) *Content of order.* Any order issued will include, where appropriate: ( 1 ) A provision that the person to be deposed must be notified of the time and place of the deposition;
( 2 ) Any conditions or limits concerning the conduct or scope of the proceedings or the subject matter that may be necessary to prevent undue delay or to protect a party or other individual or entity from undue expense, embarrassment, or oppression;
( 3 ) Limits on the time for conducting depositions, answering written interrogatories, or producing documentary evidence; and
( 4 ) Other restrictions upon the discovery process that the judge sets.
( c ) *Noncompliance.* The judge may impose sanctions under § 1201.43 of this part for failure to comply with an order compelling discovery.
[54 FR 53504, Dec. 29, 1989, as amended at 73 FR 18151, Apr. 3, 2008; 78 FR 23458, Apr. 19, 2013]
**Exhibit 12.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Rafael Miranda Robredo, certify that:

1.                I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 20-F of Endesa, S.A.;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

4.                The company’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the company and have:

(a)           Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b)          Evaluated theeffectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)           Disclosed in thisreport any change in the company’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The company’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

(a)           All significantdeficiencies**and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)          Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: May 17, 2006 |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    | By:    | /S/  RAFAEL MIRANDA ROBREDO |
|                    |   | Name: | Rafael  Miranda Robredo |
|                    |   | Title: | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
February 5, 2016

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Request for Amendment to Exemption 14552, Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–5442

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Exelon Generation Company

(“Exelon”) requests an amendment to Exemption No. 14552 to operate an additional Unmanned Aircraft 

System (“UAS”): the DJI Inspire 1 Pro, a rotorcraft/quadcopter. On January 28, 2016, the FAA issued 

Exemption No. 14552 to Exelon to allow it to operate the DJI Phantom 2, DJI Inspire 1, and InspecTools 

X-8 for aerial imagery, inspection, data collection services, and emergency planning and response 

activity. This requested amendment to that exemption will allow Exelon to operate the DJI Inspire 1 Pro

for the same reasons and under the same conditions. There has been no other change in conditions and 

reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

Exelon will comply with all of the conditions and limitations imposed in Exemption 14552 with 

condition/limitation number 1 revised to allow operation of the DJI Inspire 1 Pro under the exemption. 

Like the UAS makes and models included in Exemption No. 14552, Exelon chose the DJI Inspire 1 Pro

because of its diverse features, ease of use, adaptability, and efficiency. It is both reliable and safe. The 

DJI Inspire 1 Pro is almost identical to the Inspire 1, but with slight enhancements and an upgraded 

camera package. The DJI Inspire 1 Pro User Manual, Version 1.0 has been submitted along with this 

request for amendment. The DJI Inspire 1 Pro specifications are displayed in the table below:

Model T600

Diagonal Length 559 mm

Maximum Takeoff Weight 3500 g

Maximum Speed 18 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind)

Maximum Wind Speed Resistance 10 m/s

Max Flight Altitude 4500 m

Flight Duration ~15 mins

Operating Frequency (remote control) 5.725~50825 GHz

2.400~2.483 GHz

Transmitting Distance (outdoor and unobstructed) FCC Compliant: 3.1 mi

Output Power 9W

Aircraft Type/Class Rotorcraft/quadcopter
The Inspire 1 Pro is equipped with failsafe features that will automatically return the aircraft to home if 

connection with the controller is lost. The User Manual contains more details on its specific features.

Good cause exists to grant Exelon an amendment to Exemption No. 14552. Doing so, is in the public 

interest based on the clear direction in Section 333, the Federal Aviation Act, the high and equivalent 

level of safety of the proposed operations, and the comparable type, size, weight, speed and limited 

operating area associated with the DJI Inspire 1 Pro.

Accordingly, Exelon respectfully requests that the FAA grant an expedited amendment to add the DJI 

Inspire 1 Pro to its UAS operations.

Thank you for your consideration of this petition.

Sincerely,

Dennis Dunning

Exelon Generation Company, LLC

300 Exelon Way

Kennett Square, PA 19348
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                        Report of Independent Accountants


To the Board of Directors of
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Report on Internal Control over Processing and Reporting Relating to Securitized
Automobile Financing Receivables, that the Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. (the
"Bank"), as servicer of Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trusts, maintained effective
internal control over processing and reporting relating to securitized
automobile financing receivables for the 12 months ended December 31, 2003,
based on criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal
Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Bank's management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over processing and reporting
relating to securitized automobile financing receivables. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

      Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
processing and reporting relating to securitized automobile financing
receivable, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatement due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of internal control over processing and reporting relating to
securitized automobile financing receivables to future periods are subject to
the risk that the internal control may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.

      In our opinion, management's assertion that the Chase Manhattan Bank USA,
N.A., as servicer of Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trusts, maintained effective
internal control over processing and reporting relating to securitized
automobile financing receivables for the 12 months ended December 31, 2003, is
fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria for effective
internal control established in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 25, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
2000 FROM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH DECEMBER
31, 1999 FORM 10-K FILING.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       8,416,904
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  167,877
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    555,412
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,296,594
<PP&E>                                      91,425,944
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,165,750
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              98,742,763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,555,046
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,112
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,846,975
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                98,742,763
<SALES>                                      1,842,391
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,846,305
<CGS>                                          771,657
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               38,018,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,252,909
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,840,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,222,736
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,880,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,342,536
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,342,536
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.81


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Conceptus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)                                     the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)                                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Date: May 9, 2008

 
| /s/ Gregory E. Lichtwardt           |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
| Gregory E. Lichtwardt               |   |
| Executive Vice President, Treasurer |   |
| and Chief Financial Officer         |   |

 

----
#### § 109.500 SBA access to ILP Intermediary files.

The ILP Intermediary must allow SBA's authorized representatives, including other officers of any other Federal agency and representatives authorized by the SBA Inspector General, during normal business hours, timely access to its facility and files to review, inspect, and copy all records and documents, including electronic and hard copy, relating to the operations of the ILP Intermediary, the ILP Loan, and the loans made from the ILP Relending Fund and other records and documents as requested for oversight of the ILP Intermediary.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

HOWARD COHAN,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO.: 9:20-cv-81368-RKA

vs.

PRESIDENTE SUPERMARKET NO 45 INC, 

a Florida Profit Corporation, d/b/a PRESIDENTE 

SUPERMARKET NO 45; J & Y FAMILY 

GROCERS, INC., a Florida Profit Corporation

d/b/a PRESIDENTE SUPERMARKET NO 7

PRESIDENTE SUPERMARKET NO. 37, INC.;

a Florida Profit Corporation, d/b/a PRESIDENTE 

SUPERMARKET NO. 37

Defendant(s).

____________________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

The Plaintiff, HOWARD COHAN and the Defendant, PRESIDENTE SUPERMARKET 

NO 45 INC, a Florida Profit Corporation, d/b/a PRESIDENTE SUPERMARKET NO 45; J & Y 

FAMILY GROCERS, INC., a Florida Profit Corporation, d/b/a PRESIDENTE SUPERMARKET 

NO 7; and PRESIDENTE SUPERMARKET NO. 37, INC.; a Florida Profit Corporation, d/b/a 

PRESIDENTE SUPERMARKET NO. 37, (the Parties) hereby stipulate that (1) the Parties have 

settled this action; (2) Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses this action with prejudice against Defendants; 

(3) the Parties shall bear their own costs and fees. See Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 

F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2012).

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED November 12, 2020.

By: /s/ Gregory S. Sconzo

Gregory S. Sconzo, Esq.

Florida Bar No.: 0105553

Sconzo Law Office, P.A.

3825 PGA Boulevard, Suite 207

Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410

Telephone: (561) 729-0940

Facsimile: (561) 491-9459

By: /s/ Kielan Saborit 

KIELAN SABORIT, ESQ. 

Florida Bar No: 1003527

Lydecker Diaz

1221 Brickell Avenue, 19th Floor

Miami, FL 33131 

ksm@lydeckerdiaz.com

Telephone: (303) 416-3180

Email: ksm@lydeckerdiaz.com

Case 9:20-cv-81368-RKA Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/12/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

Email: greg@sconzolawoffice.com

Secondary Email: alexa@sconzolawoffice.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Attorney for Defendant 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on November 12, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document 

is being served this day on counsel of record in this action via transmission of Notices of Electronic 

Filing generated by CM/ECF.

_ /s/ Gregory S. Sconzo

Gregory S. Sconzo, Esq.

Case 9:20-cv-81368-RKA Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/12/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### Wolf Zibelman, Respondent, v. Morris Friedberg et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present-—Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.
§ 220.3 Who may file a petition, format for filing. ( a ) *Who may file.* A petition under this part may be filed by members of the public who can demonstrate that they are likely beneficiaries of duty suspensions or reductions. A member of the public for these purposes would generally be a firm, importer of record, a manufacturer that uses the imported article, or a government entity at the U.S. Federal, state, or local level.
( b ) *Format for filing.* Each such petition shall be submitted via the secure Commission web portal designated by the Commission and in the format designated by the Commission. The Commission will not accept petitions submitted in paper or in any other form or format. Petitions, including any attachments thereto, shall otherwise comply with the Commission's Handbook on MTB Filing Procedures as posted on the Commission's Web site.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000895648
<NAME> GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           6,121
<SECURITIES>                                    91,379
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,915
<PP&E>                                       2,089,758
<DEPRECIATION>                               (221,783)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,044,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,088
<BONDS>                                      1,237,137
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,575
<OTHER-SE>                                     742,590
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,044,390
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               209,221
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   74,325
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,357
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,542
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 59,110
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             59,110
<DISCONTINUED>                                  58,647
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,072)
<CHANGES>                                     (42,696)
<NET-INCOME>                                    73,990
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.34
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Conceptus,Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “ Company   “) hereby certifies,to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)           the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the threemonths ended September 30, 2007 (the “  Report   ”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: November 7, 2007  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| /s/ Mark M. Sieczkarek  |   |
| Mark M. Sieczkarek      |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

 

----