alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §226–1. Extension of noncompetitive oil or gas lease issued before September 2, 1960

#### (a) Lands not withdrawn from leasing

Upon the expiration of the initial five-year term of any noncompetitive oil or gas lease which was issued prior to September 2, 1960, and which has been maintained in accordance with applicable statutory requirements and regulations, the record titleholder thereof shall be entitled to a single extension of the lease, unless then otherwise provided by law, for such lands covered by it as are not, on the expiration date of the lease, withdrawn from leasing. A withdrawal, however, shall not affect the right to an extension if actual drilling operations on such lands were commenced prior to the effective date of the withdrawal and were being diligently prosecuted on the expiration date of the lease. No withdrawal shall be effective within the meaning of this section until ninety days after notice thereof has been sent by registered or certified mail to each lessee to be affected by such withdrawal.

#### (b) Known and unknown geologic structures of producing fields

As to lands not within the known geologic structure of a producing oil or gas field, a noncompetitive oil or gas lease to which this section is applicable shall be extended for a period of five years and so long thereafter as oil or gas is produced in paying quantities. As to lands within the known geologic structure of a producing oil or gas field, a noncompetitive lease to which this section is applicable shall be extended for a period of two years and so long thereafter as oil or gas is produced in paying quantities.

#### (c) Application requirement

Any noncompetitive oil or gas lease extended under this section shall be subject to the rules and regulations in force at the expiration of the initial five-year term of the lease. No extension shall be granted, however, unless within a period of ninety days prior to the expiration date of the lease an application therefor is filed by the record titleholder or an assignee whose assignment has been filed for approval or an operator whose operating agreement has been filed for approval.

#### (d) Commencement of actual drilling operations

Any lease issued prior to September 2, 1960, which has been maintained in accordance with applicable statutory requirements and regulations and which pertains to land on which, or for which under an approved cooperative or unit plan of development or operation, actual drilling operations were commenced prior to the end of its primary term and are being diligently prosecuted at that time shall be extended for two years and so long thereafter as oil or gas is produced in paying quantities.

(Pub. L. 86–705, §4, Sept. 2, 1960, 74 Stat. 789.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of Mineral Leasing Act Revision of 1960, and not as part of act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which comprises this chapter.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-105 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, July 18, 1997)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received four reports

from its Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards. The reports,

in the form of letters, provide comments on:

-- Proposed Regulatory Guide and Standard Review Plan

Chapter for Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Inservice

Inspection.

-- Proposed Final Revisions to 10 CFR Part 26, Fitness-ForDuty Program Requirements.

-- Proposed Final Revision 3 to Regulatory Guide 5.44,

"Perimeter Intrusion Alarm Systems."

-- Proposed Direct Final Rulemaking: Changes to Paragraph

(h) of 10 CFR 50.55a, "Codes and Standards."

Copies of the reports are available through the NRC's Office

of Public Affairs, the NRC's Internet Homepage

(http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW) and the Public Document Room in

Washington, D.C. To access the letters on the NRC Internet

Homepage use the "Search" function to look for "443rd."

#
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 16

- 00273

- CV

IN RE MINDI SPEARS

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied, and the emergency motion for stay

is dismissed as moot.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Denied

Opinion delivered and filed September 14 , 2016

[CV06]
#### Edward B. Kinsila, Appellant, v. Lee Shubert and Others, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the authority of *Fairman*v. *Brush*(60 Hun, 443; more fully reported in 15 N. Y. Supp. 44). Jenks, P. J., Burr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 64850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27277]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial 
Research Special Emphasis Panel; Dental Practice-Base Research 
Network.
    Date: January 7, 2019.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIDCR Conference Room, 651 Democracy One, 6701 Democracy 
Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Guo He Zhang, MPH, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Natl Institute of Dental and 
Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy 
Boulevard, Suite 672, Bethesda, MD 20892, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bbc1d3dad5dcdccefbd6dad2d795d5d2d395dcd4cd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bfc5d7ded1d8d8caffd2ded6d391d1d6d791d8d0c9">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 12, 2018.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-27277 Filed 12-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 03-127 October 3, 2003

 NRC’S ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FINDS NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FROM

PROPOSED BLEU PROJECT PREPARATION FACILITY

An environmental assessment by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has found no

significant impact from a proposed Blended Low-Enriched Uranium (BLEU) Preparation Facility at the

Nuclear Fuel Services Inc. (NFS) site in Erwin, Tennessee.

The NRC’s “finding of no significant impact” is an important step toward approval of the

second of three license amendments to allow NFS to pursue the BLEU project. This finding does not

represent approval of the license amendment.

The BLEU project is part of a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) program to reduce stockpiles

of surplus high-enriched (weapons grade) uranium through re-use or disposal as radioactive waste. Reuse is considered the favorable option by DOE because weapons grade uranium is converted to a form

unsuited for weapons production, the product can be used for peaceful purposes, and the commercial

value of the uranium can be recovered. Re-use is also considered preferable because it avoids

unnecessary use of limited radioactive waste disposal space. 

NFS currently manufactures high-enriched nuclear reactor fuel and is constructing a new

complex at the Erwin site to manufacture low-enriched nuclear reactor fuel.

The NRC approved the first license amendment in July, allowing NFS to begin receiving downblended, low-enriched uranium from the Savannah River Site complex in South Carolina for eventual

use in the BLEU project.

In the second amendment request, filed last October, NFS is seeking NRC permission to begin

processing operations at an existing building within the protected area of its Erwin site. The company

has not yet formally applied for the third license amendment, which will be for an oxide conversion

facility. Together, the three amendments make up the BLEU project.

The environmental assessment, dated September 17, is available through the NRC’s ADAMS

document management system, on the internet at

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html , with accession number ML032390428. For

assistance in using ADAMS, contact the agency’s Public Document Room at 301-415-4737, or 1-800-

397-4209. 

###
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# Time and Date:

10 a.m., Tuesday, November 9, 2004.

# Place:

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. 

# Status:

Open.

# Matters to be Considered:

                        The Commission will hear oral argument on an appeal of Eastern Associated Coal Corporation from the decision of an administrative law judge in                         *Secretary of Labor*                         v.                         *Eastern Associated Coal                                   ( print page 62917)                                Corporation,*                         Docket No. WEBA 2002-46. (Issues include whether the judge properly concluded that Eastern Associated Coal Corp. violated 30 CFR 48.11(a)(3) when it did not train two independent contractor employees on the provisions of its roof control plan addressing roof grouting.)                    

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs, subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jean Ellen, (202) 434-9950/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,

Chief Docket Clerk.

[FR Doc. 04-24195  Filed 10-26-04; 11:49 am]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 10, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-100 Lower Tribunal Nos. 19-26176 SP, 20-66 AP

________________ 

### Norma W. Ewing , Appellant, vs. 

### Avansa Auto Sales Corp. ,

Appellee. An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria D. Ortiz, Judge. Law Offices of Shaun M. Zaciewski, P.A., and Shaun M. Zaciewski, for appellant. No appearance, for appellee. Before LOGUE, HENDON, and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979).
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1385

AN ACT

To extend the provision of title 39, United States Code,

under which the United States Postal Service is authorized to issue a special postage stamp to benefit breast

cancer research.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1385 EH

1 SECTION 1. BREAST CANCER STAMP EXTENSION.

2 Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is

3 amended by striking ‘‘2005’’ and inserting ‘‘2006’’.

Passed the House of Representatives January 27,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1385

AN ACT

To extend the provision of title 39, United States

Code, under which the United States PostalService is authorized to issue a special postagestamp to benefit breast cancer research.
#### Trustees of School District No. 44, in the County of Morris, *vs.*Gray.

An injunction issued to restrain the defendant from in anywise interfering with land claimed by the bill to have been dedicated to public use, was continued to the hearing, the defendant showing no title to the property from any one in possession, nor under those in whom the title was vested.

Bill, for relief. Motion to dissolve injunction, on bill and answer and affidavits annexed thereto, respectively.

*Mr.*(?. *A. Allen,*for motion.

*Mr. H. O. Pitney, contra.*

The Chancellor.

The injunction should be retained until the hearing. The bill claims that the land in question Avas dedicated to public use, and it appears, by the affidavits on both sides, that it has been used, as alleged in the bill, for fifty or sixty years past. Indeed, it appears not to-have been in the exclusive occupation of any person, from time immemorial. The defendant’s affidavuts sIioav this, as Avell as the complainants’. The defendant; in his answer, shoAvs no title to the property from any one in possession. Nor does he shoAV any title under those in whom the title was vested. The right of Sharp to the land at the time of his conveyance to Welsh, in 1854, does not appear.
§ 1651.7 Parent or parents. If the account is to be paid to the participant's parent or parents under § 1651.2(a)(4), the following rules apply: ( a ) *Amount.* If both parents are alive at the time of the participant's death, each parent will be separately paid fifty percent of the account. If only one parent is alive at the time of the participant's death, he or she will receive the entire account balance.
( b ) *Step-parent.* A step-parent is not considered a parent unless the step-parent adopted the participant.
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-85 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-82 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, April 20, 1999)

NRC SCHEDULES PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON METHODS TO ASSESS RISK OF LOW

POWER AND SHUTDOWN OPERATIONS AT NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public workshop April 27 to discuss the

methods available to assess potential accident risks associated with low power and shutdown

operations at nuclear power plants.

The workshop, to be held at the DoubleTree Hotel at 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville,

Maryland, will begin at 7:45 a.m. and continue until 5:00 p.m.

There are certain safety issues that NRC must consider when a nuclear power plant is

operating at low power, or is shut down. After a period of operating at full power, a reactor

continues to generate heat through a process called “decay heat.” Decay heat decreases the

longer a reactor remains shut down, but systems must be in place to continually cool down the

reactor.

Also, during shutdown periods such as refueling, reactors are subject to certain safety

risks because of the configuration of reactor parts, such as reactor vessels with their “heads”

removed. Although the probability of an offsite radioactive release in such circumstances is

low, certain safety risks are involved that are not present during normal operations.

Views presented at the workshop will help the NRC develop a program on the use of

risk-informed insights regarding low power and shutdown operations.

Members of the Nuclear Energy Institute, the Electric Power Research Institute, and

other electric utility representatives, will present their views on the risks. There will be

opportunity for members of the public to ask questions and offer their comments.

Following is a complete agenda of the workshop:

7:45 - 8:15 a.m. -- Introduction

8:15 - 10:15 a.m. -- Industry presentation (Westinghouse, Scientech, Seabrook, San Onofre,

South Texas, River Bend)

10:15 - 10:30 a.m. -- Break

10:30 - 11:40 a.m. -- Industry presentation (Nuclear Energy Institute, Electric Power Research

Institute)

11:40 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. Lunch
1:00 - 1:30 p.m. -- General discussion; perspectives on low power shutdown results

1:30 - 2:00 p.m. -- General discussion; perspectives on low power shutdown scope and level of

detail

2:00 - 2:15 p.m. -- Break

2:15 - 3:30 p.m. -- General discussion: perspectives on low power shutdown methods

3:30 - 3:45 p.m. -- Break

3:45 - 4:30 p.m. -- General discussion: perspectives on low power shutdown standard

4:30 - 4:50 p.m. -- General discussion: other issues

4:50 - 5:00 p.m. -- Wrap-up.

Although there is no fee for the workshop, those wishing to attend should contact

Erasmia Lois, 301-415-6560 (e-mail: exl1@nrc.gov) to reserve a space.
exv10w1



 


Exhibit 10.1


WAIVER AND RELEASE

OF

CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT


     THIS WAIVER AND RELEASE made this 17th day of October, 2002 (the
“Effective Date”) by David R. Clark (“Executive”) to Pierre Foods, Inc. (the
“Company”).


     In consideration of Ten dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration,
the receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the
undersigned Executive does hereby release the Company from, and waive all
rights and interest in, that certain Amended and Restated Change in Control
Agreement dated July 6, 1999 (“Agreement”) by and between the Company and the
Executive, and said Agreement is hereby terminated and is of no further force
or effect, effective as of the Effective Date.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Executive has executed this Waiver and
Release as of the Effective Date.



	 	 	 
	 	/s/ David R. Clark


David R. Clark
	(SEAL)



Acknowledge, Accept and Agree

as of the Effective Date:


Pierre Foods, Inc.



	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	/s/ Pamela M. Witters



Pamela M. Witters, Chief Financial Officer
	 



26
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-02-016 April 1, 2002

CONTACT: Breck Henderson (817) 860-8128 E-mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Cellular: (817) 917-1227

NRC TO MEET WITH ENERGY NORTHWEST

TO DISCUSS SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Energy

Northwest on Wednesday, April 10, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual assessment of safety

performance at the Columbia Generating Station nuclear power plant. The facility is located near

Richland, Wa., and is operated by Energy Northwest.

The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 

6:30 p.m. at the Richland Public Library, 955 Northgate Dr., Richland. NRC staff will be available

before the meeting is adjourned to answer any questions from the public.

A letter sent from NRC Region IV to Energy Northwest addresses plant performance during the

period April 1 to December 31, 2001, and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is

available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/wnp_2001q4.pdf.

Current performance information for Columbia Generating Station is available on the NRC

web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/WASH2/wash2_chart.html.

###
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-04-008 March 2, 2004

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO HOLD REGULATORY CONFERENCE WITH ENTERGY OPERATIONS 

ON WATERFORD NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a regulatory conference with

officials of Entergy Operations, operator of the Waterford 3 nuclear power plant, on March 8. 

Conferees will discuss the significance of an inspection finding regarding the plant’s

emergency diesel generators. Waterford 3 is located about 20 miles west of New Orleans,

Louisiana.

The meeting, which is open to public observation, will begin at 1:00 p.m. in NRC Region

IV offices in Arlington, Texas. The public will have the opportunity to observe and ask

questions of the NRC staff before the meeting is adjourned.

The NRC staff will discuss with Entergy officials the inspection finding and an associated

apparent violation of NRC requirements identified in an inspection report issued on February 2. 

The apparent violation involves the licensee’s apparent failure to establish appropriate

procedures and follow them during the installation of a fuel line for an emergency diesel

generator during May 2003.

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear power plants with a

color coded process which classifies regulatory findings as either green, white, yellow or red, in

increasing order of safety significance. The NRC's preliminary evaluation determined that the

safety significance of the problem was "greater than green," meaning that the violation involved

more than very low safety significance.

No decision on the final significance, the apparent violation or any contemplated

enforcement action will be made during the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC

officials at a later time.

###