alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Radiation Dose Estimates for Radiopharmaceuticals (NUREG/CR-6345)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6345 (PDF - 4.19 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**April 1996**Date Published:**April 1996

**Prepared by:** M.G. Stabin, J.B. Stubbs, R.E. Toohey

Radiation Internal Dose Information Center Oak Ridge Institute of Science and Education Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0117

D. Howe, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Medical Applications and Biophysical Research Division Office of Health and Environmental Research Office of Energy Research U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Rockville, MD 20857

NRC Job Code L1699 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Tables of radiation dose estimates based on the Cristy-Eckerman adult male phantom are provided for a number of radiopharmaceuticals commonly used in nuclear medicine. Radiation dose estimates are listed for all major source organs, and several other organs of interest. The dose estimates were calculated using the MIRD Technique as implemented in the MIRDOSE3 computer code, developed by Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Radiation Internal Dose Information Center. In this code, residence times for source organs are used with decay data from the MIRD Radionuclide Data and Decay Schemes to produce estimates of radiation dose to organs of standardized phantoms representing individuals of different ages.

The adult male phantom of the Cristy-Eckerman phantom series is *different* from the MIRD 5, or "Reference Man" phantom (Snyder et al., 1969) in several aspects, the most important of which is the difference in the masses and absorbed fractions for the active (red) marrow. The absorbed fractions for low energy photons striking the marrow are also different. Other minor differences exist, but are not likely to significantly affect dose estimates calculated with the two phantoms. Assumptions which support each of the dose estimates appears at the bottom of the table of estimates for a given radiopharmaceutical.

In most cases, the model kinetics or organ residence times are explicitly given. The results presented here can easily be extended to include other radiopharmaceuticals or phantoms.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Exhibit
      32.1





Ener1,
      Inc.


500
      West
      Cypress Creek Road-Suite 100


Ft.
      Lauderdale, Florida, 33309





March
      15,
      2006





Securities
      and Exchange Commission


100
      F
      Street, NE


Washington,
      DC 20549





Re:
      Certification Of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
      1350





Dear
      Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
      connection with the accompanying Amendment No. 2 to Quarterly Report on Form
      10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Ronald Stewart, Chief Executive
      Officer of Ener1, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1)
            such
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended
                September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and








2)
            the
                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
                Ener1,
                Inc., for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, fairly presents,
                in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                Ener1, Inc.




By:
            /s/
              Ronald StewartRonald
              StewartChief
              Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer andDuly
                Authorized Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
      retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.





This
      certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.1 to Ener1, Inc.`s
      quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
      to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
      reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
      except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
      filing.
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies that this periodic
report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and that information  contained in
this periodic report fairly presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial
condition and results of operations of Ridgewood Electric Power Trust II.

Date:  October 14, 2004      /s/ Robert E. Swanson
                             --------------------------------
                             Robert E. Swanson
                             Chief Executive Officer

Date:  October 14, 2004      /s/ Christopher I. Naunton
                             --------------------------------
                             Christopher I. Naunton
                             Chief Financial Officer
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 20

- 00162

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020

- 001350

- 1

Before Sudderth, C.J.; G abriel and Kerr, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### S HALANDRA 

### D ABBS 

### , Appellant

V



### .
C HICORY 

### C OURT 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On November 12, 2020, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed
as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could

dismis s the appeal for want of prosecution unless , within ten days, appellant filed with

the court a n appellant ’ s brief and a n accompanying motion reasonably explaining the
brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),

38 .8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response. Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43 .2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered : December 17, 2020
<Page>

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Public
Accountants" incorporated by reference into this Post-Effective Amendment No. 6
to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-79701) of Fortis Benefits
Insurance Company and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report
dated February 17, 2000, with respect to the financial statements of Fortis
Benefits Insurance Company included in the Prospectus and Statement of
Additional Information of Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Registration
Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-79701) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Minneapolis, Minnesota                                  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
December 27, 2002
CERTIFICATION OF PFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Salil Dhaumya, Principal Financial Officer of Pan American Goldfields Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:   1.This Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).  2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/    Salil DhaumyaSalil DhaumyaPrincipal Financial Officer
 Date: June 13, 2011
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

                                    [LOGO]

                   Central European Distribution Corporation

                             Executive Bonus Plan

The executive officers shall be entitled to participate in the "Executive Bonus
Plan" which is made up as follows:

(i)   Bonus will be calculated on base EBITDA as presented to the Board for the
      appropriate year. The calculation principle has been accepted at the Board
      Meeting of May 1, 2001.
(ii)  Calculation of EBIDTA will not include foreign-exchange adjustments.
(iii) The bonus will be calculated as 2% of EBITDA achieved by CEDC for a figure
      reported between a base threshold and an upper threshold. These thresholds
      will, be agreed each year by the board after the annual shareholders
      meeting.
(iv)  The 2% figure, if achieved, will be distributed amongst the CEDC Executive
      Officers in the following proportion; Chief Executive Officer 1%, Chief
      Financial Officer 0.5% and Chief Operating Officer 0.5%.
(v)   In addition, the Executives will be awarded options should the above
      target be reached. The options will be awarded at the rate of 5,000
      options per 0.5% of EBITDA. The term of the options will be confirmed on
      the day the grant is given.
(vi)  If CEDC achieves EBIDTA greater than the upper threshold, the amount of
      the bonus pool will increase and be calculated as 2.5% of figure achieved.
      It will be distributed in the same proportion as described above.
(vii) The options awarded will also increase if amount reaches the upper
      threshold. In this case, the Executives will receive 7,500 options in the
      same proportion as outlined in (v) above.

The bonus and the options will be granted following the approval of CEDC's
audited accounts.
The above bonus will be valid for the years 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 unless it
is decided otherwise at the annual CEDC Management Board meeting.
#### § 148.76 Waiver of requirements or limitations.

In any case in which the limitation on the quantity of alcoholic beverages and tobacco products which may be exempted from duty and tax under § 148.74(c) or the failure of the person to meet the requirements that he be returning upon the termination of assignment to “extended duty,” as explained in § 148.74(d), will cause undue hardship to the person through no fault of his own, but rather because of the nature of his assignment or other hardship circumstances, the Commissioner of Customs, upon receipt of a request from the Government agency involved, may waive the limitation or the requirement, as the case may be, if he deems such waiver warranted by the facts.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program

#### U.S. Geological SurveyFact Sheet 2005-3059

# Health-Based Screening Levels and their Application to Water-Quality Data 

### *By* P.L. Toccalino, J.S. Zogorski, and J.E. Norman

*To supplement existing Federal drinking-water standards andguidelines, thereby providing a basis for a more comprehensiveevaluation of contaminant-occurrence data in a human-health context,USGS began a collaborative project in 1998 with USEPA, the New JerseyDepartment of Environmental Protection, and the Oregon Health &Science University to calculate non-enforceable health-based screeninglevels. Screening levels were calculated for contaminants that do nothave Maximum Contaminant Level values using a consensus approach thatentailed (1) standard USEPA Office of Water methodologies (equations)for establishing Lifetime Health Advisory (LHA) and Risk-Specific Dose(RSD) values for the protection of human health, and (2) existingUSEPA human-health toxicity information.*

## Table of Contents

BackgroundScreening levels expand human-health context for NAWQA findingsEvaluating ground-water data in a human-health context in New JerseyPlans for application at the National scaleReferencesContacts for additional informationThe NAWQA Program

----

This report is available online in Portable Document Format (PDF). If you do not  have the **Adobe Reader**,   it is available for free download from Adobe Systems Incorporated.

#### **Download  the report (PDF, 0.2 MB)**

Document Accessibility:  Adobe Systems Incorporated has information about PDFs and the visually impaired.  This information provides tools to help make PDF files accessible. These tools  convert Adobe PDF documents into HTML or ASCII text, which then can be read  by a number of common screen-reading programs that synthesize text as audible  speech. In addition, an accessible version of Adobe Reader 8.0 for Windows  (English only), which contains support for screen readers, is available. These  tools and the accessible reader may be obtained free from Adobe at **Adobe  Access**.

----

For further information about this report, contact the NationalWater-Quality Assessment Program office.

----
#### § 1632.8 Changes with respect to publicly announced meetings.

The subject matter of a meeting or the determination to open or close a meeting or a portion of a meeting to public observation may be changed following public announcement under § 1632.6 only if a majority of the Members of the Board determines by a recorded vote that that agency business so requires and that no earlier announcement of the change was possible. Public announcement of such change and the vote of each member upon such change will be made pursuant to § 1632.6(c). Changes in time, including postponements and cancellations of a publicly announced meeting or portion of a meeting or changes in the place of a publicly announced meeting will be publicly announced pursuant to § 1632.6(c) by the Secretary of the Board or, in the Secretary's absence, the Acting Secretary of the Board.
### §285g. Availability of applicable accounts of House

Until such time as funds are appropriated by law to carry out the purpose of this chapter, the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives shall be available for such purpose.

(Pub. L. 93–554, title I, ch. III, §101, Dec. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1777; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §207, Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1742.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is based on section 205(h) of House Resolution No. 988, Ninety-third Congress, Oct. 8, 1974, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 93–554.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "applicable accounts of the House of Representatives" for "contingent fund of the House".
The Huntington Mortgage Company                      (LOGO)
7575 Huntington Park Drive                            HUNTINGTON MORTGAGE
Columbus, Ohio 43235                                 COMPANY


                              Report of Management

We, as members  of  management of The  Huntington  Mortgage  Company (HMC), a
wholly-owned  subsidiary of The Huntington  National Bank, are  responsible  for
complying with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS
(USAP).  We are also responsible for establishing  and  maintaining  effective
internal  control over  compliance with the minimum  servicing  standards as set
forth in the USAP as of December 31, 1997 and for the year then ended.  Based on
this  evaluation,  we assert that during the year ended  December 31, 1997,  HMC
complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the USAP.

As of and for this same period,  HMC had in effect a fidelity bond in the amount
of $40,000,000 and an errors and omissions policy in the amount of $8,000,000.


/s/R. Frederick Taylor
R. Frederick Taylor, President


/s/Irving A. Adler
Irving A. Adler, Senior Vice President




A subsidiary of The Huntington National Bank
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. III-01-016 April 27, 2001

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT CO. MAY 3 TO DISCUSS

INSPECTION FINDING AT KEWAUNEE NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff members will meet May 3 in Lisle, Illinois, with

representatives of the Nuclear Management Company to discuss a recent finding concerning the fire

protection systems at the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Station in Kewaunee, Wisconsin.

The meeting, called a Regulatory Conference, will begin at 1 p.m. CDT in the Third Floor

Conference Room of the NRC’s Region III Office, 801 Warrenville Road in Lisle. The meeting is open

to public observation. NRC staff members will be available after the session to address questions and

comments from members of the public.

During a two week inspection which was completed in February, NRC inspectors questioned

whether an electrical box in the auxiliary feedwater pump 1B room was properly constructed to protect

the cables inside from damage during a possible fire. The NRC requires that the insulating fire barrier

withstand a fire for three hours.

The electrical box in question was installed in 1983 and contains cables for various plant

systems such as portions of the auxiliary feedwater system. The auxiliary feedwater system is designed

to remove heat from the reactor if the normal feedwater system is lost.

The purpose of the regulatory conference is to discuss the concern about a potential problem

and its causes, the proposed safety significance categorization, and the apparent violation. The

licensee - in this case the Nuclear Management Company - is provided with an opportunity to clarify

aspects of the NRC inspection report, as necessary, and to outline its proposed corrective action.

The NRC uses a four category rating system for its inspection findings; from green, through

white and yellow, to red, depicting increasing safety significance.

This inspection finding preliminarily has been evaluated as “yellow” which means it concerns

an issue of substantial safety significance.

The color assessments are used to determine the NRC’s response to the findings, which may

include additional meetings with plant officials as well as follow-up inspections to review the

company’s response.
Following the May 3 meeting, the NRC staff will continue its review of the finding and

determine its final assessment and the agency’s resulting actions. The outcome of the NRC staff’s

review of the finding, which normally takes four to six weeks, will be on the NRC’s enforcement web

page at:

http://www.nrc.gov/OE/ Select the “enforcement actions” link.

Additional information on the NRC’s reactor inspection and assessment program is on the web

site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/index.html.

###
EXHIBIT 10.30

                            CPI AEROSTRUCTURES, INC.
                              200A Executive Drive
                            Edgewood, New York 11717


                                             As of January 1, 2003


Mr. Arthur August
Chairman and President
CPI Aerostructures, Inc.
200A Executive Drive
Edgewood, New York  11717

Dear Mr. August:

     This letter will serve to amend the Employment Agreement ("Employment
Agreement") dated August 14, 2001 between you and CPI Aerostructures, Inc.
(except as herein amended, all other provisions of the Employment Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect).

     1. The first sentence of Section 1.1 of the Employment Agreement shall be
amended to read as follows:

     "The Company shall employ Executive from August 14, 2001 until December 31,
2001 as its Chairman of the Board ("Chairman"), President and Chief Executive
Officer ("CEO"), from January 1, 2002 until December 31, 2002 as its Chairman
and CEO, and from January 1, 2003 until December 31, 2004 as its Chairman, under
the terms hereof."

     If satisfactory, please sign a counterpart of this letter in the place
below to confirm you agreement and return it to me.

                                              Sincerely,


                                              /s/ Edward J. Fred
                                              ------------------------------
                                              Edward J. Fred
                                              Chief Financial Officer
AGREED:

/s/ Arthur August
-------------------------
Arthur August
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-99-02 January 7, 1999

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT MONTICELLO NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Lisle, Illinois, have

announced the assignment of Steve Burton as the agency’s Senior

Resident Inspector at the Monticello nuclear power plant in

Monticello, Minnesota.

Burton joined the NRC in 1996 as a reactor operations engineer.

Most recently he was an NRC resident inspector at the Arkansas

Nuclear One power plant.

Prior to joining the NRC, Burton obtained NRC Reactor and Senior

Reactor Operator licenses while holding various technical and

management positions at nuclear power plants in New York and New

Jersey. He also served in the U.S. Navy nuclear power program as

a machinist mate. He received a bachelor’s degree in nuclear

technology from the University of the State of New York.

Burton and his wife Elenora reside in Monticello, Minnesota.

Burton joins NRC Resident Inspector David Wrona at Monticello.

They can be reached at the Monticello plant at 612/295-2066.

####
### SUBCHAPTER II—RECORDS AND REPORTS ON MONETARY INSTRUMENTS TRANSACTIONS