alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §187. Assignment or subletting of leases; relinquishment of rights under leases; conditions in leases for protection of diverse interests in operation of mines, wells, etc.; State laws not impaired

No lease issued under the authority of this chapter shall be assigned or sublet, except with the consent of the Secretary of the Interior. The lessee may, in the discretion of the Secretary of the Interior, be permitted at any time to make written relinquishment of all rights under such a lease, and upon acceptance thereof be thereby relieved of all future obligations under said lease, and may with like consent surrender any legal subdivision of the area included within the lease. Each lease shall contain provisions for the purpose of insuring the exercise of reasonable diligence, skill, and care in the operation of said property; a provision that such rules for the safety and welfare of the miners and for the prevention of undue waste as may be prescribed by said Secretary shall be observed, including a restriction of the workday to not exceeding eight hours in any one day for underground workers except in cases of emergency; provisions prohibiting the employment of any child under the age of sixteen in any mine below the surface; provisions securing the workmen complete freedom of purchase; provision requiring the payment of wages at least twice a month in lawful money of the United States, and providing proper rules and regulations to insure the fair and just weighing or measurement of the coal mined by each miner, and such other provisions as he may deem necessary to insure the sale of the production of such leased lands to the United States and to the public at reasonable prices, for the protection of the interests of the United States, for the prevention of monopoly, and for the safeguarding of the public welfare. None of such provisions shall be in conflict with the laws of the State in which the leased property is situated.

(Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, §30, 41 Stat. 449; Pub. L. 95–554, §5, Oct. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 2074.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–554 substituted "provisions prohibiting the employment of any child under the age of sixteen in any mine below the surface" for "provisions prohibiting the employment of any boy under the age of sixteen or the employment of any girl or woman, without regard to age, in any mine below the surface".
#### Hatcher v. Burchett.

Sept. 25, 1945.

*453B. M. James for appellant.

Edward P. Hill for appellee.

Opinion op the Court by

Morris, Commissioner

Dismissing appeal.

Appellant and appellee were contending candidates for nomination to the office of county attorney on the Democratic ticket. Returns showed that Burchett received 4,056 votes and Hatcher 1,948. Hatcher filed his petition seeking to have the court hold Burchett’s nomination void, and to direct issuance of a certificate to Jiim, on the generally stated ground that Burchett had violated our Corrupt Practices Act. Ch. 123, KRS. The court sustained demurrer and there being no further pleading by appellant, dismissed the petition.

Appellee has moved the court to dismiss because the supersedeas bond was filed too late, thus depriving this court of jurisdiction. The order of dismissal was signed by the Judge on August 23, 1945, and the record before us bears the endorsement, “Entered on civil order book No. 45, Aug. 23, 1945,” and shows that the bond was executed on August 25, 1945, and filed with the clerk on that day.

Appellee in support of his motion points to sec. 122.040, KRS, which in part reads: “A party desiring to appeal from a judgment entered under KRS 122.030 shall, not later than the next day after the judgment is rendered, execute a supersedeas bond in the same form and to the same effect as supersedeas bond in other civil actions * *

In Williams v. Ezzell, 210 Ky. 213, 275 S. W. 783, in construing sec. 1550-28, KS, which required the bond to be executed on the same day on which judgment was rendered, and where the bond was not so filed, we held that in order to confer jurisdiction on this court the bond should be filed in strict accordance with the statute. We approved the principle announced in Ward v. Howard, 177 Ky. 38, 97 S. W. 506, which followed two former opinions cited in the Williams case, supra.

In appellant’s brief on the motion to dismiss he *454merely says that appellee’s contention that the bond was not filed “on the day of judgment” is incorrect; that the bond was executed within an hour after the judgment was rendered. We have carefully checked the record and find that our statement, supra, is correct. On the authority of the cases above cited the appeal is dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 64922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27372]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration # 15831 and # 15832; Connecticut Disaster Number 
CT-00044]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Connecticut

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Connecticut (FEMA-
4410-DR), dated 12/05/2018.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 09/25/2018 through 09/26/2018.

DATES: Issued on 12/05/2018.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/04/2019.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/05/2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 12/05/2018, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties/Areas: Middlesex and New London Counties, including 
the Mashantucket Pequot Indian Tribe and Mohegan Tribe of Indians of 
Connecticut located within New London County.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.500
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 158316 
and for economic injury is 158320.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2018-27372 Filed 12-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-068 June 5, 2001

ACRS SUBCOMMITTEE TO MEET ON

REACTOR POWER UPRATES ON JUNE 12

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS)

Subcommittee on Thermal-Hydraulic Phenomena has scheduled a meeting on June 12 in Rockville,

Maryland, to discuss issues associated with nuclear power plant applications for power uprates.

The meeting, which will be partially closed to the public, will be held in Room T-2B3 of the

agency's Two White Flint North building, at 11545 Rockville Pike, beginning at 8:30 a.m. It will

include presentations and discussions with representatives of the NRC staff, General Electric Nuclear

Energy, the ACRS staff, and other interested persons. Portions of the meeting will be closed to public

attendance to discuss proprietary information related to General Electric Nuclear Energy.

For additional information or agenda changes, contact Paul A. Boehnert at 301-415-8065.

ACRS meeting notices, agendas, transcripts and letters are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW/ . Persons planning to attend this meeting are encouraged to contact

Mr. Boehnert one or two working days prior to the meeting to determine if there have been any schedule

changes.

###
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 21
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 21
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 21
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 21
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 21
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 21
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 21
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 21
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 21
EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 21
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 21
EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 21
EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 21
EPA SANITIZED Page 14 of 21
EPA SANITIZED Page 15 of 21
EPA SANITIZED Page 16 of 21
EPA SANITIZED Page 17 of 21
EPA SANITIZED Page 18 of 21
EPA SANITIZED Page 19 of 21
EPA SANITIZED Page 20 of 21
EPA SANITIZED Page 21 of 21
Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 89 FR 20832, Mar. 25, 2024.

§ 351.528 Exchanges of undervalued currencies. ( a ) *Currency undervaluation* — ( 1 ) *In general.* The Secretary normally will consider whether a benefit is conferred from the exchange of United States dollars for the currency of a country under review or investigation under a unified exchange rate system only if that country's currency is undervalued during the relevant period. In determining whether a country's currency is undervalued, the Secretary normally will take into account the gap between the country's real effective exchange rate (REER) and the real effective exchange rate that achieves an external balance over the medium term that reflects appropriate policies (equilibrium REER).
( 2 ) *Government action.* The Secretary normally will make an affirmative finding under paragraph (a)(1) of this section only if there has been government action on the exchange rate that contributes to an undervaluation of the currency. In assessing whether there has been such government action, the Secretary will not normally include monetary and related credit policy of an independent central bank or monetary authority. The Secretary may also consider the government's degree of transparency regarding actions that could alter the exchange rate.
( b ) *Benefit* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Where the Secretary has made an affirmative finding under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the Secretary normally will determine the existence of a benefit after examining the difference between: ( i ) The nominal, bilateral United States dollar rate consistent with the equilibrium REER; and
( ii ) The actual nominal, bilateral United States dollar rate during the relevant time period, taking into account any information regarding the impact of government action on the exchange rate.
( 2 ) *Amount of benefit.* Where there is a difference under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the amount of the benefit from a currency exchange normally will be based on the difference between the amount of currency the firm received in exchange for United States dollars and the amount of currency that firm would have received absent the difference referred to in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( c ) *Information sources.* In applying this section, the Secretary will request that the Secretary of the Treasury provide its evaluation and conclusion as to the determinations under paragraphs (a) and (b)(1) of this section.
[85 FR 6043, Feb. 4, 2020]
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

I, James C. Eckert, of OMNI Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OMNI Energy Services Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 30, 2007



/s/ James C. EckertJames C. EckertPresident and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23









<PAGE>
                    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON SCHEDULE
                    ----------------------------------------


The  Board  of  Directors
Delta  Mills,  Inc.

Under date of August 13, 1999, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of
Delta  Mills,  Inc.  as  of  July  3,  1999  and  June 27, 1998, and the related
consolidated  statements of operations, shareholder's equity, and cash flows for
each  of  the years in the three-year period ended July 3, 1999, as contained in
the  1999  annual  report on Form 10-K.  These consolidated financial statements
and  our  report  thereon  are  included  in the annual report on Form 10-K.  In
connection  with  our  audit  of  the  aforementioned  consolidated  financial
statements,  we  also  audited  the  related  consolidated  financial  statement
schedule  for  each of the years in the three-year period ended July 3, 1999, as
listed  on in Item 14(d) of Form 10-K.  This financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion  on  the  financial  statement  schedule  based  on  our  audit.

In  our  opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation
to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in  all  material  respects  the  information  set  forth  therein.

                                                     /s/  KPMG  LLP
                                                     --------------
Greenville,  South  Carolina                              KPMG  LLP
August  13,  1999


<PAGE>
### FOR PUBLICATION 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  F ORD M OTOR C OMPANY ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. J OE R. T ODECHEENE , as the surviving natural parent of Esther Todecheene, deceased; M ARY No. 02-17048 T ODECHEENE , as the surviving 

#  D.C. No. natural parent of Esther CV-02-01100-PGR Todecheene, deceased,

Defendants-Appellants, and N AVAJO N ATION D ISTRICT C OURT ; L EROY S. B EDONIE , The Honorable,

Defendants. 

# 

1161

#  F ORD M OTOR C OMPANY ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. J OE R. T ODECHEENE , as the surviving natural parent of Esther No. 02-17165 Todecheene, deceased; M ARY T ODECHEENE , as the surviving D.C. No.



#  natural parent of Esther CV-02-01100-PGR Todecheene, deceased, ORDER

Defendants, and N AVAJO N ATION D ISTRICT C OURT ; L EROY S. B EDONIE , The Honorable,

Defendants-Appellants. 

# 

Filed February 1, 2007 Before: Barry G. Silverman, William A. Fletcher, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges.

ORDER Joe and Mary Todecheene’s Petition for Rehearing is GRANTED in part. The opinion in this case, Ford Motor Company v. Todecheene , 394 F.3d 1170 (9th Cir. 2005) is WITHDRAWN. Because our en banc opinion in Smith v. Kootenai College , 434 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2006), did not resolve the jurisdiction issue presented in this case, we cannot say that the tribal courts in this case plainly lack jurisdiction over the dispute 1162 F ORD M OTOR C O . v. T ODECHEENEamong Ford Motor Company, the Todecheenes and the Navajo Nation. See Boozer v. Wilder , 381 F.3d 931, 935 (9th Cir. 2004) (requiring exhaustion unless the tribal courts plainly lack jurisdiction). Accordingly, we REMAND this case to thedistrict court with instructions that the district court stay proceedings in this matter pending exhaustion of available proceedings in the tribal courts, including appellate review. See Iowa Mutual Ins. Co. v. LaPlante , 480 U.S. 9, 16 (1987). (“[T]he federal policy supporting tribal self-government directs a federal court to stay its hand in order to give the tribal court a full opportunity to determine its own jurisdiction.”) (internal quotation marks omitted) (emphasis added). The petitions for rehearing en banc filed by Joe and Mary Todecheene and the Navajo Nation are DENIED as moot. The panel retains jurisdiction over any further appeals in this case. 1163

F ORD M OTOR C O . v. T ODECHEENEPRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2007 Thomson/West.
#### §§ 201.141-201.148 [Reserved]
#### John F. Moroney, Plaintiff, v. Lawrence C. Manuell, Defendant.

Motion for stay granted on condition that appellant perfect his appeal, place the case on the calendar for Tuesday, June 1, 1915, and be ready for argument when reached, without costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ.
<Page>

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent
Auditors" incorporated by reference into this Post-Effective Amendment No. 16
to the Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 33-48266) and to the
incorporation by reference therein of our report dated February 17, 2000,
with respect to the financial statements of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company
and our report dated March 29, 2000 on the financial statements of Fortis
Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account C, included in the Prospectus of
Post-Effective Amendment No. 14 to the Registration Statement (Form S-6
No. 33-48266) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Minneapolis, Minnesota                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
January 21, 2003
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24 - 0210 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DARIN PAUL GUCKEEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 20 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 15 2024

08/15/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0210
Plutonium

Plutonium is a radioactive metallic element with the atomic number 94. It was discovered in 

1940 by scientists studying how to split atoms to make atomic bombs. Plutonium is created in a reactor 

when uranium atoms absorb neutrons. Nearly all plutonium is man-made. 

Plutonium predominantly emits alpha particles – a type of radiation that is easily stopped and has 

a short range. It also emits neutrons, beta particles and gamma rays. It is considered toxic, in part, 

because if it were to be inhaled it could deposit in the lungs and eventually cause damage.

There are five “common” isotopes of plutonium, Pu-238, Pu-239, Pu-240, Pu-241, and Pu-242. 

These are all “fissionable” – the atom’s nucleus can easily split apart if it is struck by a neutron. 

The different isotopes have different “half-lives” 

– the time it takes to lose half of its radioactivity. Pu239 has a half-life of 24,100 years and Pu-241’s halflife is 14.4 years. Substances with shorter half-lives 

decay more quickly than those with longer half-lives, so 

they emit more energetic radioactivity.

Like any radioactive isotopes, plutonium 

isotopes transform when they decay. They might 

become different plutonium isotopes or different 

elements, such as uranium or neptunium. Many of these 

“daughter products” are themselves radioactive.

Different uses have been found for plutonium. Plutonium-238 has been used to power batteries 

for some heart pacemakers, as well as provide a long-lived heat source to power NASA space missions. 

Like uranium, plutonium can also be used to fuel nuclear power plants. This is done in a few countries 

but not currently in the United States. 

Today’s light water reactors – used to make commercial power in the United States – create 

plutonium when the uranium in their fuel fissions. Some of the neutrons released by uranium interact 

with other uranium atoms to form plutonium. Some of the plutonium itself fissions – part of the chain 

reaction of splitting atoms that is the basis of nuclear power. Any plutonium that does not fission stays 

in the spent fuel. Spent nuclear fuel from U.S. reactors contains about 1 percent plutonium by weight.

There are many metric tons of plutonium in spent nuclear fuel stored around the world. To be

usable, plutonium would need to be separated from the other products in spent fuel. This process, known 

as reprocessing, uses chemicals to separate plutonium from uranium and other fission products. Once 

separated, plutonium oxide can be mixed with uranium oxide to produce mixed oxide or MOX fuel. 

h
Page | 2

MOX fuel can be used in power reactors. Reprocessing is controversial internationally, because 

the plutonium can also be used to make nuclear weapons. The United States briefly reprocessed spent 

fuel in the 1970s, but there is currently no commercial reprocessing program in the country.

January 2020
Docket No: FAA-2015-8471 Dir ID: 2013-NM-153-AD
<PAGE>















                                   EXHIBIT 99



<PAGE>



                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Herbert W. Watts, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Johnnie L. Craft,
Treasurer, of Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") each certify in his
capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the Annual Report of
the Company on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2002 and that to the best
of his knowledge:

1.       the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of
         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.




September 25, 2002                          /s/ Herbert W. Watts
---------------------                     -------------------------------------
Date                                      Herbert W. Watts
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer


September 25, 2002                          /s/ Johnnie L. Craft
---------------------                     -------------------------------------
Date                                      Johnnie L. Craft
                                          Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)