alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1598

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 16, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in projects within the San 

Diego Creek Watershed, California, and for other purposes.
2

HR 1598 RFS 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Irvine Basin Surface 

5 and Groundwater Improvement Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and 

8 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102–

9 575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by 

10 inserting after section 1635 the following: 

11 ‘‘SEC. 1636. IRVINE BASIN GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE 

12 WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. 

13 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera14 tion with the Irvine Ranch Water District, California, is 

15 authorized to participate in the design, planning, and con16 struction of projects to naturally treat impaired surface 

17 water, reclaim and reuse impaired groundwater, and pro18 vide brine disposal within the San Diego Creek Watershed. 

19 ‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the costs 

20 of the projects authorized by this section shall not exceed 

21 25 percent of the total cost. 

22 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide 

23 funds for the operation or maintenance of a project au24 thorized by this section.’’.
3

HR 1598 RFS 

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 in section 2 of the Reclamation Projects Authorization and 

3 Adjustment Act of 1992 is amended by inserting after the 

4 item relating to section 1635 the following:

‘‘1636. Irvine basin groundwater and surface water improvement projects.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 15, 

2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 Statement Pursuant to Section 906 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
By
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Dated: November 10, 2004 I, Martin M. McDermut, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of Superconductor Technologies Inc, herby certify that, to my
knowledge, that: 1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Superconductor
Technologies for the three and nine month period ended October 2, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Superconductor Technologies Inc. /s/ Martin S. McDermutMartin S. McDermutSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary 2
### §2046. Bond of Architect, Assistant Architect, and other employees

The Architect, Assistant Architect, and any employees of the Architect designated by the Architect under section 2045 of this title shall each give bond in the sum of $5,000 with such surety as the Secretary of the Treasury may approve for the handling of the financial transactions under such special deposit account.

(Pub. L. 87–82, §6, July 6, 1961, 75 Stat. 200.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 174j–6 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.
#### § 19.34 Customs supervision.

Port directors shall exercise such supervision and control over the transactions covered by §§ 19.29 through 19.32 as will insure that there will be no unauthorized access to the imported wheat and no unauthorized mixing, blending, or commingling of such imported wheat. Importers, exporters, proprietors of Customs bonded warehouses, bonded common carriers, and others handling imported wheat in continuous Customs custody shall maintain such records as will enable Customs officers to verify the handling to which the imported wheat has been subjected, and to establish whether there has been a proper accounting to Customs for any increase in the quantity of the wheat or shortages resulting from shrinkage or other factors. These records shall be retained for a period of 5 years from the date of the transaction. Port directors shall from time to time request the appropriate Customs officer to examine such records of importers, exporters, warehouse proprietors, bonded common carriers, and others handling such wheat in continuous Customs custody as may be deemed necessary to ascertain whether there has been any failure to comply with the applicable Customs laws and regulations.

[28 FR 14763, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 79-159, 44 FR 31968, June 4, 1979; T.D. 82-204, 47 FR 49374, Nov. 1, 1982]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-013 March 6, 2002

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC TO MEET WITH EXELON TO DISCUSS PEACH BOTTOM PLANT PERFORMANCE

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Exelon Generation

Company, LLC, on Tuesday, March 12, to discuss the results of the agencyís annual assessment of

safety performance at the Peach Bottom nuclear power plant. The facility, which has two operational

reactors, is located in Delta, Pa., and operated by Exelon.

 The meeting, which will be the open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 7 p.m.

at the Peach Bottom Inn, 6085 Delta Road, Delta. NRC staff will be available after the meeting to

answer questions from the public on the safety performance of Peach Bottom and the role of the NRC

in ensuring safe plant operation.

 The performance period to be discussed is April 1, 2001, to December 31, 2001. In addition,

NRC staff will provide an overview of the agencyís Reactor Oversight Process.

 A letter sent from the NRC Region I office to Exelon addresses plant performance during the

period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/pb_2001q4.pdf

 Current performance information for Peach Bottom Unit 2 is available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/PB2/pb2_chart.html

 Current performance information for Peach Bottom Unit 3 is available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/PB3/pb3_chart.html

 ###
### §1002a. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–214, §7(16), July 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 174

Section, Pub. L. 95–356, title VIII, §803(a), (b), Sept. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 585; Pub. L. 96–125, title VIII, §802(2), Nov. 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 948; Pub. L. 97–99, title IX, §908, Dec. 23, 1981, 95 Stat. 1385, related to development of geothermal energy sources on military lands, contracts for provision and operation of production facilities and energy purchases, and terms, conditions and prerequisites of such contracts. See sections 2917 and 2922a of Title 10, Armed Forces.

Pub. L. 95–356, title VIII, §803(c), Sept. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 585, which provided that this section take effect Oct. 1, 1978, was repealed by Pub. L. 97–214, §7(16), July 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 174.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1982, and applicable to military construction projects, and to construction and acquisition of military family housing before, on, or after such date, see section 12(a) of Pub. L. 97–214, set out as an Effective Date note under section 2801 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
### §5001. Civil action for death or personal injury in a place subject to exclusive jurisdiction of United States

(a) Death.—In the case of the death of an individual by the neglect or wrongful act of another in a place subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States within a State, a right of action shall exist as though the place were under the jurisdiction of the State in which the place is located.

(b) Personal Injury.—In a civil action brought to recover on account of an injury sustained in a place described in subsection (a), the rights of the parties shall be governed by the law of the State in which the place is located.

(Added Pub. L. 113–287, §4(b)(1), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3261.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5001 | 16 U.S.C. 457 | Feb. 1, 1928, ch. 15, 45 Stat. 54. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "civil action" are substituted for "action" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.
SERVED: JANUARY 13, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHfNGTON, DC 

[NTHEMAITEROF 

LIBERTY FLYING SERVICE, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penally Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1012 

jrpARTHENT OF 

.'riAMSPORWiGN 

:OGKETOPEPMiONS 

m i JAN 13 P 2--21 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND DISMISSAL OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2009SO950490) was received by the 

Office of Hearings on October 13. 2011, and has been assigned to the undersigned. On 

November 8. 2011. Complainant's Counsel served a letter stating that the parties had reached a 

settlement and moving to withdraw its complaint. Accordingly, pursuant to 14C.F.R. t; 13.215, 

this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

The FAA shall send the Judge and the Docket a copy of any compromise order or final 

order assessing civil penalty. 

SO ORDERED. -) 

Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Uarw Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-20M-1012 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPV 

. Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington^ DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur >yright Building - Suite 2W1OOO' 

ONE COPV 

Ray Jones, Esq., Respondent's Counsel 

43 Tollie Lane 

Pikeville, KV4150] 

TEL: 606-432-5777 

Nicholas R. Milliard, Complainanl 's Counsel 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington. DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-3452 

FAX: 202-267-5106 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, Chief AdminisiraCive Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.' 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For .service in person or by expedited courier, use ihc following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W.. Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

- 2 -
Exhibit 31
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (this report) of Penwest Pharmaceuticals Co.; and2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
 Date: April 29, 2010
    /s/ Jennifer L. GoodJennifer L. GoodPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer)
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-11111

Summary Calendar

GLORIA J BATES

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

MICHAEL J ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:05-cv-00269

Before DAVIS, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant Gloria J. Bates (“Bates”) appeals the Commissioner of

Social Security’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and

supplemental security income benefits. On review, “we consider only whether

the Commissioner applied the proper legal standards and whether substantial

evidence in the record supports the decision to deny benefits.” Audler v. Astrue,

501 F.3d 446, 447 (5th Cir. 2007); see 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). As Magistrate Judge

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 22, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-11111

2

Clinton E. Averitte’s thorough Report and Recommendation explained, see Bates

v. Astrue, No. 2:05-cv-0269, 2008 WL 4367287 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 24, 2008), the

Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) applied the proper legal standards, and the

medical records from Doctors Plata and Saadeh provide substantial evidence to

support the ALJ’s finding that Bates was not disabled.

AFFIRMED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 Statement Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings I, Martin S. McDermut, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Superconductor
Technologies Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 12, 2004 /s/ Martin S. McDermutMartin S. McDermutSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer andSecretary
§ 206.439 Allowable costs. ( a ) General requirements for determining allowable costs are established in 2 CFR part 200, Cost Principles. Exceptions to those requirements as allowed in 2 CFR 200.101 and 2 CFR 200.102 are explained in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) Administrative and management costs for major disasters will be paid in accordance with 44 CFR part 207.
( c ) *Pre-award costs.* FEMA may fund eligible pre-award planning or project costs at its discretion and as funds are available. Recipients and subrecipients may be reimbursed for eligible pre-award costs for activities directly related to the development of the project or planning proposal. These costs can only be incurred during the open application period of the grant program. Costs associated with implementation of the activity but incurred prior to grant award are not eligible. Therefore, activities where implementation is initiated or completed prior to award are not eligible and will not be reimbursed.
[72 FR 57875, Oct. 11, 2007, as amended at 72 FR 61750, Oct. 31, 2007; 79 FR 76086, Dec. 19, 2014; 86 FR 50679, Sept. 10, 2021]
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-157 October 11, 2000

NRC BROADENS USE OF DOSIMETERS

TO REFLECT NEW ADVANCES IN TECHNOLOGY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is broadening its regulations for personnel dosimeters

used to determine the radiation dose received by workers at licensed nuclear facilities. The change

allows use of new technology with any type of dosimeter, as long as the processor of the dosimeter is

appropriately accredited.

Current regulations require the use of either a film badge, which uses photographic

development, or a thermoluminescent dosimeter, which uses heat-stimulated light emission as a

monitoring technique, to determine radiation dose to an individual. New dosimeter technologies are

providing techniques to measure radiation which are more precise. For example, optically stimulated

luminescent dosimeters that use optical lasers for processing have higher sensitivity to radiation than

either of the other devices. Other superior dosimeter technologies and processing techniques are likely

to appear in the future.

Dosimetry processing must be conducted under the National Voluntary Laboratory

Accreditation Program, which is operated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Because the NRC considers this action to be non-controversial and routine, the rule will

become effective 75 days after publication in the Federal Register, expected shortly. However, if

significant adverse comments are received, the agency will withdraw the action and address such

comments.

Comments may be mailed to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,

DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications staff. Comments may also be provided at

http://ruleforum.llnl.gov on the agency’s website.

###
|   | 1. | I      have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 8-K      filed by U.S. Bank Trust National Association, solely as Trustee for the      Trust Certificates (TRUCs) Series 2001-2 Trust and any distribution      reports filed in respect of the Trust during the 2008 calendar      year; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information in those reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any      untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under      which such statements were made, no misleading as of the last day of the      period covered by the annualreport; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | The      distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the      depositor by the Trustee under the trust agreement for inclusion in these      reports is included in such reports;and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | I      am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee under      the trust agreement and except as disclosed in these reports, the Trustee      has fulfilled its obligations under the trust  agreement. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | U.S.      BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION By:      /s/David J.      KolibachukName:      David J. KolibachukTitle:  Vice      PresidentDate:   March      24,2009 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-02-043 August 5, 2002

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: opa2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC CITES OCONEE NUCLEAR PLANT FOR VIOLATION 

OF LOW TO MODERATE SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has determined that a violation of NRC safety

regulations at Unit 1 of the Duke Energy’s Oconee nuclear power plant near Seneca, South Carolina,

should be characterized as “white,” meaning that it is of low to moderate importance to safety. 

An NRC inspection in January, 2001, identified the fact that a lack of adequate procedural

controls existed at Oconee Unit 1 to ensure closure of the containment building upon a possible loss of

shutdown cooling capability during a refueling outage in the Fall of the year 2000. 

No problem occurred, but the NRC said a procedure to combat a loss of shutdown cooling

while the reactor was partially defueled was inadequate because it lacked sufficient instructions to

ensure that operators would disconnect temporary services running through a temporary hatch cover

and shut the outer emergency hatch door, instead of relying upon the non-qualified temporary cover

for containment closure.

Under its safety significance determination process, NRC officials classify certain conditions at

nuclear power plants as being one of four colors which delineate increasing levels of safety

significance, beginning with green and progressing to white, yellow or red.

The NRC staff informed Duke Energy in a letter dated August 1 that the agency’s final

significance determination was that the procedural control concerns at Oconee Unit 1 constituted a

White finding and issued the company a Notice of Violation. 

The NRC said procedural revisions and corrective actions taken by the company were adequate,

and that the finding does not represent a current safety issue.

Additional details on the white finding and on the Notice of Violation are available from the

NRC’s Region 2 Office of Public Affairs at the above address or online in the NRC’s electronic

reading room in the agency’s ADAMS document system, accessible at www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html . Help in using ADAMS is available by contacting the NRC Public Document Room at

301- 415-4737 or 1-800-397-4209.

###