alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ASECO
CORPORATION'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED JUNE 29, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997
<CASH>                                           7,532
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,847
<ALLOWANCES>                                       526
<INVENTORY>                                     12,002
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,334
<PP&E>                                           2,936
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,156
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,836
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,948
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,836
<SALES>                                          8,865
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,865
<CGS>                                            4,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (6)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,521)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       219
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,740)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,740)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.29)
        

</TABLE>
§ 201.28 Requests for correction or amendment of records. ( a ) If, upon viewing his or her records, an individual disagrees with a portion thereof or feels sections thereof to be erroneous, the individual may request amendment[s] of the records pertaining to him or her. The individual should request such an amendment in writing and should identify each particular record in question, the system[s] of records wherein the records are located, specify the amendment requested, and specify the reasons why the records are not correct, relevant timely or complete. The individual may submit any documentation that would be helpful. The request for amendment of records shall be addressed to the Privacy Act Officer, United States International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, and shall clearly indicate both on the envelope and in the letter that it is a Privacy Act request for amendment of records.
( b ) Not later than 10 days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal public holidays) after the date of receipt of a Privacy Act request for amendment of records, the Privacy Act Officer shall acknowledge such receipt in writing. Such a request for amendment will be granted or denied by the Privacy Act Officer or, for records maintained by the Inspector General. If the request is granted, the Privacy Act Officer, or the Inspector General for records maintained by the Inspector General, shall promptly make any correction of any portion of the record which the individual believes is not accurate, relevant, timely, or complete. If, however, the request is denied, the Privacy Act Officer shall inform the individual of the refusal to amend the record in accordance with the individual's request and give the reason(s) for the refusal. In cases where the Privacy Act Officer or the Inspector General has refused to amend in accordance with an individual's request, he or she also shall advise the individual of the procedures under § 201.30 of this part for the individual to request a review of that refusal by the full Commission or by an officer designated by the Commission.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 28, 2015

d0518 

# Order

Clerk May 28, 2015

149735(13)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 149735

COA: 321298

Wayne CC: 02

- 003922

- FC

JOEL ALLEN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 3,

2015 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
Exhibit 32  Certification of Annual Report on Form 10-K of National Health Realty, Inc. For The Year Ended December 31, 2006   The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigned’s best knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for National Health Realty, Inc. (“Issuer”) for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”):  (a)fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(b)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.  This Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Issuer for the annual period ended December 31, 2006.  This Certification is executed as of March 16, 2007.    /s/ Robert G. AdamsRobert G. AdamsPresident/s/ Donald K. DanielDonald K. DanielPrincipal Accounting Officer(Principal Financial Officer)   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to National Health Realty, Inc. and will be retained by National Health Realty, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6173

KENNETH RAY PACK, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD ANGELONE, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-1582-AM) Submitted: March 22, 2001 Decided: March 30, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Ray Pack, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth Ray Pack seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Pack’s motion to proceed informa pauperis, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Pack v. Angelone , No. CA-00-1582-AM (E.D. Va. filedJan. 5, 2001; entered Jan. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAWN A. VANDERSLICE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 576 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of February, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### John J. Casey, Appellant, v. Frank S. Gannon and Another, as Executors, etc., and Others, Respondents.

Motion denied, without costs. Present— Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin E. Franklin,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Martin E. Franklin
------------------------

Martin E. Franklin
Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2004

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ian G.H. Ashken, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Ian G.H. Ashken
---------------------------

Ian G.H. Ashken
Chief Financial Officer
August 9, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          13,594
<SECURITIES>                                    11,096
<RECEIVABLES>                                      412
<ALLOWANCES>                                        51
<INVENTORY>                                        151
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,569
<PP&E>                                           1,741
<DEPRECIATION>                                     705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,393
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,681
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,452
<OTHER-SE>                                    (29,747)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,393
<SALES>                                            701
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   701
<CGS>                                            1,194
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,194
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,017
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (126)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,574)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,574)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,574)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.60)
        

</TABLE>
### §357. State or local government rights; taxation

Nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed to affect the rights of the State or other local authorities to exercise any right which they may have with respect to properties covered by leases issued under this chapter, including the right to levy and collect taxes upon improvements, output of mines, or other rights, property, or assets of any lessee of the United States.

(Aug. 7, 1947, ch. 513, §8, 61 Stat. 915.)
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-03-042 October 23, 2003

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS RESULTS OF 

SPECIAL INSPECTION AT DIABLO CANYON

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with officials of Pacific Gas & Electric

Co. on October 28 to discuss the results of a special inspection. The inspection was performed 

to evaluate the failure of battery chargers at the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant, located near

San Luis Obispo, California. 

The meeting, which is open to public observation, will be held at the PG&E Community

Center, 6588 Ontario Road, in San Luis Obispo at 1:00 p.m. The public is invited to observe the

meeting and NRC staff will be available for comments or questions from the public before the

meeting adjourns.

NRC decided to conduct a special inspection at the plant on August 11 after there were

three battery charger failures at Unit 1 and three failures at Unit 2 during a 15-month period. The

problem has been corrected.

The chargers provide DC power to various safety related and non-safety related systems

and equipment throughout the plant. If the chargers are unavailable, batteries can supply DC

power for up to eight hours.

The NRC’s Special Inspection Team, consisting of a resident inspector and senior reactor

engineer from the NRC’s Region IV office in Arlington, Texas, evaluated the adequacy of the

licensee’s response to the battery charger failures, their root cause evaluation, and corrective

actions.
- 2 -

The inspection report will be available 30 days after the meeting on the agency’s web site

and through its Electronic Reading Room at http://www.nrc.gov as an Agencywide Document

Access and Management System (ADAMS) document. Help in using ADAMS is available

through the NRC Public Document Room at 301/415-4737 or 800/397-4209.

 ###
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Edward A. Pudsey, Respondent, against New York Central Railroad Company et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

This is an appeal by the Special Fund for Reopened Cases from findings and decisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Board dated July 15, 1947, and August 11, 1947, awarding the claimant compensation for total disability to December 5, 1946, totaling $6,878.85, with payments to continue. The claimant was employed as a machinist by the Boston and Albany Railroad Company, which was succeeded by the New York Central Railroad Company, at its railroad yard at Selkirk, New York. On March 15, 1930, he was assigned to repair a broken pipe on a locomotive which had been taken to the enginehouse in the yard. At about 8:00 P.M., while turning the broken pipe, the wrench which he was using slipped. The claimant lost his balance and was thrown against a lever, which lever shattered his eyeglasses and a piece of glass entered his right eye. As a result of said accidental injury the claimant sustained a punctured eyeball and cuts above and below the eyeball. The evidence reveals that the engine under repair was used in both interstate and intrastate operation. On the day of the accident the locomotive, which had hauled a freight train from Springfield, Mass., to the railroad yard at Selkirk, New York, had been cut off from the freight cars and brought into the engine-house for repairs. The fires were dumped and there was no steam up; the engine was dead. In consequence of said repairs it had been withdrawn from interstate commerce and at the time of said repairs was not an instrumentality of interstate commerce. The employee injured in making said repairs was, therefore, entitled to State compensation *(Matter of McGowan*v. *New York Central B. B. Co.,*265 App. Div. 272, 274; *New York, New Haven & Hartford B. B. Go.*v. *Bezue,*284 U. S. 415). The board found that *“*At the time Edward A. Pudsey sustained the accidental injuries herein above referred to, he was not engaged in interstate commerce, or in any work so closely related thereto as to be a part thereof; but was engaged in an employment covered by the Workmen’s Compensation Law at the time of said accident. At the time of said accident, the engine upon which Edward A. Pudsey was working was withdrawn from interstate service, was a dead engine,- the fires of which had been dumped. There was no steam and hardly any gas. At the time the said engine was incapable of movement.” The evidence sustains the findings and decisions of the board. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Russell and Deyo, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 831]
Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 89 FR 20832, Mar. 25, 2024.

§ 351.508 Debt forgiveness. ( a ) *Benefit.* In the case of an assumption or forgiveness of a firm's debt obligation, a benefit exists equal to the amount of the principal and/or interest (including accrued, unpaid interest) that the government has assumed or forgiven. In situations where the entity assuming or forgiving the debt receives shares in a firm in return for eliminating or reducing the firm's debt obligation, the Secretary will determine the existence of a benefit under § 351.507 (equity infusions).
( b ) *Time of receipt of benefit.* In the case of a debt or interest assumption or forgiveness, the Secretary normally will consider the benefit as having been received as of the date on which the debt or interest was assumed or forgiven.
( c ) *Allocation of benefit to a particular time period* — ( 1 ) *In general.* The Secretary will treat the benefit determined under paragraph (a) of this section as a non-recurring subsidy and will allocate the benefit to a particular year in accordance with § 351.524(d), or over a period of 12 years, whichever is longer.
( 2 ) *Exception.* Where an interest assumption is tied to a particular loan and where a firm can reasonably expect to receive the interest assumption at the time it applies for the loan, the Secretary will normally treat the interest assumption as a reduced-interest loan and allocate the benefit to a particular year in accordance with § 351.505(c) (loans).
[63 FR 65407, Nov. 25, 1998, as amended at 89 FR 20841, Mar. 25, 2024
### §263. Permits to use or lease of nonmineral lands for camp sites, and other purposes; annual rentals; acreage

In addition to areas of such mineral land which may be included in any such prospecting permits or leases, the Secretary of the Interior, in his discretion, may grant to a permittee or lessee of lands containing sodium deposits, and subject to the payment of an annual rental of not less than 25 cents per acre, the exclusive right to use, during the life of the permit or lease, a tract of unoccupied nonmineral public land, not exceeding forty acres in area, for camp sites, refining works, and other purposes connected with and necessary to the proper development and use of the deposits covered by the permit or lease.

(Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, §25, 41 Stat. 447.)
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT-21.1
------------

Significant Subsidiaries of the Registrant

                                                              State or Country
                                                                Of Formation
                                                                -------------

Teligent Services, Inc.                                           Delaware
Teligent Telecommunications, L. L. C.                             Delaware
Teligent Communications, L. L. C.                                 Delaware
Teligent of Virginia, Inc.                                        Virginia
Teligent License Company I, L.L.C.                                Delaware
Teligent License Company II, L.L.C.                               Delaware
FirstMark Communications, Inc.                                    Delaware
Association Communications, Inc.                                 Washington
OMC Communications, Inc.                                          Maryland
Easton Telecom Services, Inc.                                       Ohio
BackLink, L.L.C.                                                  Delaware
JTel, L.L.C.                                                      Delaware
KatLink, L.L.C                                                    Delaware
Associated Communications Deutschland GmbH                         Germany
**Exhibit 23**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-70345) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Option Plan, 1998 Stock Option Plan, and 1998 Supplemental Stock Option Plan of United Rentals, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-133256) pertaining to the1998 Stock Option Plan, and 1998 Supplemental Stock Option Plan of United Rentals, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-60458) pertaining to the 2001 Stock Plan of United Rentals, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8No. 333-139589) pertaining to the 2001 Comprehensive Stock Plan of United Rentals, Inc., the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.’s 333-74091 and 333-87903) pertaining to the options outstanding in connection with the 1997 PerformanceAward Plan of U.S. Rentals assumed pursuant to the merger with U.S. Rentals of United Rentals, Inc., the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.’s 333-39770 and 333-98567) pertaining to the United Rentals, Inc. 401(k) Investment Plan and UnitedRentals, Inc. Acquisition Plan of United Rentals, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-113787) pertaining to the 2001 Senior Stock Plan of United Rentals, Inc. and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-116882)pertaining to the Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of United Rentals, Inc. of our reports dated February 25, 2008 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of United Rentals, Inc. and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting of United Rentals, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/ Ernst & Young 

New York, New York 

February 25, 2008