alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

89–011 2001

107th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 107–18

AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA EXTENDING THE AGREEMENT OF JUNE 1, 1992, CONCERNING

FISHERIES OFF THE COASTS OF THE UNITED STATES, WITH

ANNEX, AS EXTENDED (THE 1992 AGREEMENT). THE PRESENT

AGREEMENT, WHICH WAS EFFECTED BY AN EXCHANGE OF

NOTES AT TALLINN ON SEPTEMBER 7 AND SEPTEMBER 12, 2000,

EXTENDS THE 1992 AGREEMENT TO JUNE 30, 2003, PURSUANT

TO 16 U.S.C. 1823(a)

JANUARY 20, 2001.—Referred to the Committee on Resources and ordered

to be printed

(1)

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, January 17, 2001.

Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT,

Speaker of the House of Representatives,

Washington, DC.

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: In accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens

Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1801 et

seq.), I transmit herewith an Agreement between the United States

of America and the Government of the Republic of Estonia extending the Agreement of June 1, 1992, Concerning Fisheries Off the

Coasts of the United States, with annex, as extended (the 1992

Agreement). The present Agreement, which was effected by an exchange of notes at Tallinn on September 7 and September 12, 2000,

extends the 1992 Agreement to June 30, 2003.

In light of the importance of our fisheries relationship with the

Republic of Estonia, I urge that the Congress give favorable consideration to this Agreement at an early date.

Sincerely,

WILLIAM J. CLINTON.

(3)

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-04-050 September 21, 2004

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH SOUTHERN NUCLEAR TO DISCUSS

SECOND FARLEY PLANT LICENSE RENEWAL INSPECTION

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will meet with Southern Nuclear Operating Company

management at 9:00 a.m. (CDT) on Friday, Oct. 1, in Dothan, Ala., to discuss the results of the

agency’s second inspection of the Farley nuclear plant’s license renewal program. 

The meeting will be held in the Houston County Commission Chambers on the 3rd floor of the

Houston County Administrative Building, 462 North Oates Street in Dothan. It will be open to public

observation, and NRC officials will be available prior to the close of the meeting to answer questions

from interested observers. A report on the inspection will be issued approximately 45 days after the

meeting and will be available to the public.

The inspection, which began Sept. 13th and runs until Oct. 1st, is the second license renewal

review at the Farley plant, and is conducted to verify that programs are in place to manage the material

condition of the plant’s systems, structures and components during the 20 additional years of operation

should the NRC approve the license renewal application. 

The NRC conducted a meeting at the company’s offices in Birmingham in May to discuss

results of the agency’s initial inspection of the Farley license renewal program. Southern Nuclear

submitted an application to renew the licenses for the two units at the Farley plant license in September

of last year, and that application, if approved by the NRC, would extend the expiration date of the two

units’ operating licenses from 2017 for Unit 1 and 2021 for Unit 2 to 2037 and 2041 respectively. 

###

EDITOR’S NOTE: As announced in a previous news release (NRC No. II-04-045), the NRC staff is

conducting two similar meetings on Sept. 30, the day before this meeting, to receive public input on

the draft environmental impact statement for Farley plant license renewal. Those meetings begin at

1:30 and 7:00 p.m. with time for informal discussion beginning one hour before each meeting, and will

be held at the Quality Inn on Ross Clark Circle in Dothan.
§ 1201.175 Judicial review of cases decided under 5 U.S.C. 7702. ( a ) *Place and type of review.* The appropriate United States district court is authorized to conduct all judicial review of cases decided under 5 U.S.C. 7702. Those cases include appeals from actions taken under the following provisions: Section 717(c) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)); section 15(c) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended (29 U.S.C. 633a(c)); and section 15(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (29 U.S.C. 216(b)).
( b ) *Time for filing request.* Regardless of any other provision of law, requests for judicial review of all cases decided under 5 U.S.C. 7702 must be filed within 30 days after the appellant received notice of the judicially reviewable action.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**I, Michael Eggers, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of RealNetworks,Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of RealNetworks, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operationsof RealNetworks, Inc.Date: May 30, 2007     By: /s/ Michael Eggers  Name:  Michael Eggers  Title: Senior Vice President,    Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toRealNetworks, Inc. and will be retained by RealNetworks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §606. Disposition of surplus or obsolete property

(a) The Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall have the authority, within the limits of available appropriations, to dispose of surplus or obsolete personal property by inter-agency transfer, donation, sale, trade-in, or discarding. Amounts received for the sale or trade-in of personal property shall be credited to funds available for the operations of the Congressional Budget Office and be available for the costs of acquiring the same or similar property. Such funds shall be available for such purposes during the fiscal year in which received and the following fiscal year.

(b) Subsection (a) shall apply with respect to fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1996.

(Pub. L. 104–197, title I, §105, Sept. 16, 1996, 110 Stat. 2404; Pub. L. 107–68, title I, §126, Nov. 12, 2001, 115 Stat. 577.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the appropriation act cited as the credit to this section, and not as part of title II of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 which comprises this chapter.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 104–53, title I, Nov. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 527.

Pub. L. 103–283, title I, July 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 1433.

Pub. L. 103–69, title I, Aug. 11, 1993, 107 Stat. 701.

#### Amendments

2001—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–68 substituted "sale, trade-in, or discarding" for "or discarding" and inserted at end "Amounts received for the sale or trade-in of personal property shall be credited to funds available for the operations of the Congressional Budget Office and be available for the costs of acquiring the same or similar property. Such funds shall be available for such purposes during the fiscal year in which received and the following fiscal year."
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone 301/415-820

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-056 May 7, 2003

NRC PROPOSES AMENDING REGULATIONS FOR STRUCTURES, 

SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 

BASED ON SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is proposing to amend its regulations to revise

certain regulatory controls for structures, systems and components (SSCs) at nuclear power

plants based on their safety significance.

NRC regulations call for conservative safety margins, strict procedural controls and

multiple safety systems to establish defense-in-depth for the protection of public health and

safety. Special regulatory controls -- rigorous design qualifications, record-keeping, maintenance

and testing requirements -- are used to ensure that SSCs necessary to safely shut down a nuclear

reactor and prevent off-site releases function effectively during and after an accident.

Due to the evolving nature of nuclear reactor safety regulations, these requirements

encompass a very broad scope of SSCs -- some of which are very important to safety; others of

which, experience and new analytical techniques indicate, provide only minimal, or a negligible

contribution to safety, thereby possibly focusing NRC staff and licensee resources on issues of

minor safety significance.

The proposed changes use up-to-date analytic tools and risk insights, and further enhance

plant safety by enabling nuclear power plant licensees to more precisely determine the safety

significance of SSC’s. If licensees choose to use the proposed alternative approach, some SSCs

of "low safety significance" would be subject to less stringent requirements than currently exist. 

Conversely, some SSCs of greater significance would now be subject to new requirements. This

would enable both nuclear power plant licensees and the NRC to more efficiently focus their

resources on issues of greater safety significance. In addition to the proposed rulemaking, the

NRC staff will issue a draft regulatory guide for public comment.

Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on the proposed amendments

to NRC regulations within 75 days after publication of a Federal Register notice, expected

shortly. The comments should be addressed to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. 

Comments may also be submitted via the NRC’s interactive rulemaking web site at

http://ruleforum.llnl.gov
MP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0510

CODY WAYNE JOHNSTON,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and

including June 16, 2022, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 10 2022

05/10/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0510
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-199 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(November 3, 1998)

COMMISSION TO MEET WITH STAKEHOLDERS NOVEMBER 13

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with several invited stakeholders Friday,

November 13, to discuss concerns about the NRC’s regulatory program and to follow up on

issues raised at a previous stakeholders’ meeting in July.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, will be held from 9:00 a.m. until 12:00

noon. If necessary, the meeting will continue after the lunch break, from 1:30 until 3:00 p.m. It

will be in the auditorium of the NRC headquarters Two White Flint North building, 11545

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. NRC’s headquarters complex is near the White Flint Station on

the Washington Metro Red Line at the intersection of Rockville Pike and Marinelli Road.

NRC Chairman Shirley Ann Jackson will preside. Also taking part will be

Commissioners Greta J. Dicus, Nils J. Diaz, Edward McGaffigan Jr., and Jeffrey Merrifield.

The meeting will focus on the NRC staff’s progress in addressing issues raised during

the July 17 stakeholders’ meeting and during recent Congressional hearings. These issues

concern the inspection and performance assessment process; the enforcement program;

license renewal; license transfers; transition to a risk-informed, performance-based regulatory

framework; and other issues under review.

Once again the sessions will be in a round-table format to help the Commission

conduct a dialogue with the invitees. Participants will provide comments on the power reactor

portion of the agency’s plan regarding its direction, metrics for success, and other potential

issues.

Among those participating, in addition to the five Commissioners, will be:

ˇ Erle Nye, chairman and chief executive officer, Texas Utilities, and chairman of

the Nuclear Energy Institute;

ˇ Joe F. Colvin, president and chief executive officer, Nuclear Energy Institute;

ˇ Corbin A. McNeill Jr., president and chief executive officer, PECO Energy Co.,

and a director of the Nuclear Energy Institute;

ˇ Dr. James T. Rhodes, chairman and CEO, Institute of Nuclear Power

Operations;

ˇ Harold B. Ray, executive vice president, Southern California Edison Co;
ˇ David A. Lochbaum, nuclear safety engineer, Union of Concerned Scientists;

ˇ Dr. Forrest J. Remick, former NRC Commissioner and former associate vice

president for research and professor of nuclear engineering, The Pennsylvania

State University;

ˇ Dr. William D. Travers, Executive Director for Operations, NRC;

ˇ Sam Collins, Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, NRC;

ˇ James P. Riccio, Public Citizen’s Critical Mass Energy Project;

ˇ Gary Jones, associate director, Energy, Resources, and Science Issues, U.S.

General Accounting Office;

ˇ Jill Lipoti, Assistant Director for Radiation Protection Programs, State of New

Jersey.

###
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Radioanalytical Technology for 10 CFR Part 61and Other Selected Radionuclides: Literature Review (NUREG/CR-6230, PNL-9444)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6230 (PDF - 2.61 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**January 1996**Date Published:**March 1996

**Prepared by:** C.W. Thomas, V.W. Thomas, D.E. Robertson

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory  Richland, Washington 99352 Operated by Battelle Memorial Institute

P.R. Reed, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Regulatory Applications Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code L1808

Availability Notice

## Abstract

A comprehensive literature review and assessment was conducted to identify and evaluate radioanalytical technology and procedures used for measuring 10 CFR 61 radionuclides and other long-lived isotopes. This review evaluated radiochemical procedures currently in use at a number of laboratories in the United States, as well as identifying new advanced methods and techniques which could be adapted for routine radiochemical analyses of low-level radioactive waste.The 10 CFR 61 radionuclides include 14C, 60Co, 59,63Ni, 90Sr, 94Nb, 99Tc, 129I, 137Cs, and TRU Isotopes with half-lives greater than five years. The other low-level radionuclides of interest include 7,10Be, 26Al, 36Cl, 93Mo, 109,113mCd, and 121m,126Sn, which may be present in various types of waste streams from nuclear power stations.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 1:20-cv-23228-UU

WINDY LUCIUS,

Plaintiff,

v.

TEXAS DE BRAZIL (HOLDING) CORP.,

Defendant.

/

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), with no responsive pleadings having yet been 

filed by Defendant, Plaintiff Windy Lucius hereby gives notice that she voluntarily dismisses all 

claims against Defendant with prejudice, and requests this Court to terminate the action.

Dated: October 7, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ J. Courtney Cunningham

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

FBN: 628166

8950 SW 74th Court, Suite 2201

Miami, FL 33156

T: 305-351-2014

cc@cunninghampllc.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 7, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system.

/s/ J. Courtney Cunningham

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

Case 1:20-cv-23228-UU Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/07/2020 Page 1 of 1
§ 1645.3 Calculation of total net earnings for each TSP core fund. ( a ) Each business day, net earnings will be calculated separately for each TSP core fund.
( b ) Net earnings for each fund will equal: ( 1 ) The sum of the following items, if any, accrued since the last business day: ( i ) Interest on money of that fund which is invested in the Government Securities Investment Fund;
( ii ) Interest on other short-term investments of the fund;
( iii ) Other income (such as dividends, interest, or securities lending income) on investments of the fund; and
( iv ) Capital gains or losses on investments of the fund, net of transaction costs.
( 2 ) Minus the accrued administrative expenses of the fund, determined in accordance with § 1645.4.
( c ) The net earnings for each TSP core fund determined in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section will be added to the residual net earnings for that fund from the previous business day, as described in § 1645.5(b), to produce the total net earnings. The total net earnings will be used to calculate the share price for that business day.
[70 FR 32214, June 1, 2005, as amended at 87 FR 31681, May 24, 2022]
### §3808. Limitations

(a) A hearing under section 3803(d)(2) of this title with respect to a claim or statement shall be commenced within 6 years after the date on which such claim or statement is made, presented, or submitted.

(b) A civil action to recover a penalty or assessment under section 3806 of this title shall be commenced within 3 years after the date on which the determination of liability for such penalty or assessment becomes final.

(c) If at any time during the course of proceedings brought pursuant to this chapter the authority head receives or discovers any specific information regarding bribery, gratuities, conflict of interest, or other corruption or similar activity in relation to a false claim or statement, the authority head shall immediately report such information to the Attorney General, and in the case of an authority in which an Office of Inspector General is established by chapter 4 of title 5 or by any other Federal law, to the Inspector General of that authority.

(Added Pub. L. 99–509, title VI, §6103(a), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1947; amended Pub. L. 117–286, §4(b)(57), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4349.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "chapter 4 of title 5" for "the Inspector General Act of 1978".
#### 1175 De Kalb Avenue Company, Inc., Respondent, v. Thomas A. Clarke, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Mo opinion. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
### §5355. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated the following amounts for the following fiscal years to carry out the purposes of this subchapter:

| **For fiscal year:** | **The amount authorized is:** |
| --- | --- |
| 1999 | $5,000,000. |
| 2000 | $7,500,000. |
| 2001 | $10,000,000. |
| 2002 | $12,500,000. |
| 2003 | $15,000,000. |
| 2004 | $15,000,000. |
| 2005 | $15,000,000. |

(Added Pub. L. 105–310, §2(a), Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2948; amended Pub. L. 108–458, title VI, §6102(b), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3745.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Pub. L. 108–458 in table inserted items specifying amounts authorized for fiscal years 2004 and 2005.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

((((((((((((((((

No. 05-0814

((((((((((((((((

In Re  Covenant Medical Center And John Eaton, L.V.N.

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

**ORDER**

1.The motion for immediate temporary relief, filed on September 29, 2005, is granted in part and denied in part.  This case is **ABATED**pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 7.2 to allow the successor judge to reconsider the court’s order entered December 31, 2004, granting real party in interest’s motion for extension of time.  The relators’ request for stay is denied. 

2.This case is removed from the Court's active docket and shall be treated as closed, subject to reinstatement upon proper motion or further order of the Court.  

3.The Court requests that relators notify the Court when the successor judge has ruled in accordance with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 7.2(b).

(Judge Johnson not sitting)

Done at the City of Austin, this 21st day of October, 2005.

Andrew Weber, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1610 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1610

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 120 East Ritchie Avenue in Marceline, Missouri, as the ``Walt Disney 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2003

Mr. Graves (for himself, Mr. Skelton, Mrs. Emerson, Mr. Akin, Mr. Clay, 
  Mr. Blunt, Mr. Hulshof, Ms. McCarthy of Missouri, and Mr. Gephardt) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 120 East Ritchie Avenue in Marceline, Missouri, as the ``Walt Disney 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WALT DISNEY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Redesignation.--The facility of the United States Postal 
Service located at 120 East Ritchie Avenue in Marceline, Missouri, and 
known as the Marceline Main Office, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Walt Disney Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Walt Disney 
Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```