alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-058 September 10, 2002

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC ISSUES FINDING OF LOW TO MODERATE SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE 

TO CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a "white" finding to the Calvert Cliffs nuclear

power plant for an issue involving the plant’s emergency sirens. The NRC considers the issue to be of

low to moderate importance to safety but one which may require additional NRC inspections. 

Calvert Cliffs, a twin-reactor plant located in Lusby, Md., is operated by Constellation

Generation Group.

In November of last year, Constellation informed the NRC that 49 sirens located in Calvert

County, Md., were not capable of being activated in a timely manner from August 14 to November 5,

2001. An icon on computers in the 911 center for Calvert County had been removed from screens. 

Without the icon, the alert and notification system was disabled and could not be activated in a timely

manner. NRC regulations require that members of the public within the emergency planning zone be

notified within about 15 minutes from the time that State and local officials are notified of an

emergency condition. 

Using the agency's significance determination process, NRC officials classify certain findings

at nuclear power plants as being one of four colors which delineate increasing levels of safety

significance, beginning with "green" and progressing to "white," "yellow" or "red."

In an August 12 letter to Constellation, the NRC preliminarily classified the finding as white

and offered the company an opportunity to meet with the NRC to discuss it. The company did not

contest the characterization of the risk significance and declined the opportunity for a regulatory

conference to discuss the issue or to respond in writing. 

The company also was cited for a violation of NRC requirements involving the same issue and

has 30 days to respond to the notice of violation. 

###
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-068 April 18, 2000

NRC REVISES WELL LOGGING REGULATIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has amended its regulations governing the use of

radioactive materials in well logging, an oil and gas exploration technique. The revisions reflect

changes in well logging technology that have occurred since the NRC issued its original well logging

regulations in 1987, and eliminate provisions that are unnecessary and burdensome without adversely

affecting public health and safety. Other changes improve and clarify the regulations to reduce

confusion.

Well logging is a technique used in exploration to help predict the commercial viability of new

or existing wells. It traditionally involves lowering a well logging tool, including a sealed source of

radioactive material (usually Americium-241 or Cesium-137) and an associated radiation detector, into

a well on a wireline.

Information collected by a detector is sent to the surface through the wireline and plotted on a

chart as the logging tool is slowly raised from the bottom of the well. The data can include properties

of the underground formation, such as the type of rock, porosity, hydrocarbon content and density.

Licensed radioactive materials are used for similar purposes in coal and other mineral exploration.

When the 1987 regulations were issued, licensees were required to stop drilling the hole for the

well while parts of the drilling pieces were removed and the logging tool was lowered down the well.

Improved technology now in use allows licensees to lower a logging tool down a well at the same time

that the hole for the well is being drilled.

The new technology is commonly referred to as “logging while drilling.” It requires licensees

to use an extra, relatively small radioactive source in addition to the larger radioactive sources currently

used. The smaller source is used to calibrate the well logging tool and help make sure it is working

properly during the “logging while drilling” operation. This new technology not only permits

improved evaluation of geologic formations, but also can reduce drilling costs and improve safety.

NRC’s original well logging regulations, based on the use of only larger radioactive sources,

included provisions that were unnecessary and potentially burdensome for the additional small sources.

These revisions eliminate such unnecessary requirements.
The NRC received five comments on the proposed rule, which was published in the Federal

Register on April 19 of last year. The final rule will become effective on May 17, 30 days after

publication in the Federal Register yesterday.

###
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-82737 and Forms S-8 No. 333-127177 and No.
333-61699) of National Health Realty, Inc. of our reports dated January 23,
2004, with respect to the 2003 consolidated financial statements and schedules
of National Health Realty, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Nashville, Tennessee
March 6, 2006
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-136 October 26, 2004

 

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS 

TO MEET NOV. 4-6 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards will hold a

public meeting Nov. 4-6, in Rockville, Md., to discuss, among other items, the status of early site

permit reviews, two proposed rules and the status of the NRC’s program for assessing material

degradation at nuclear power plants. The proposed rules involve risk-informing the acceptance criteria

for emergency core cooling systems for nuclear power reactors and post-fire reactor operator manual

actions.

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at

11545 Rockville Pike, from 8:30 a.m. to 7 p.m. on Thursday and Friday, and from 8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m.

on Saturday. Portions of the meeting on Thursday and Friday afternoon and Saturday may be closed to

the public. A complete agenda is available on the NRC’s Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2004. 

Individuals with questions or those wanting to make public statements during the meeting

should contact Sam Duraiswamy at 301-415-7364. Videoconferencing is available for open sessions of

this meeting. To use this service, call Theron Brown at 301-415-8066 at least 10 days before the

meeting to ensure availability. Those requesting the service are responsible for telephone line charges

and for providing the equipment and facilities that they use to establish the videoteleconferencing link.

###
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 27, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23973]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health; Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the Advisory Committee on Research on Women's Health.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: Advisory Committee on Research on Women's 
Health.
    Date: November 18, 2004.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: Provide advice to the Office of Research on Women's 
Health (ORWH) on appropriate research activities with respect to 
women's health and related studies to be undertaken by the national 
research institutes; to provide recommendations regarding ORWH 
activities; to meet the mandates of the office, and for discussion 
of scientific issues.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 1, 1 Center 
Drive, Wilson Hall, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Joyce Rudick, Director, Programs & Management, 
Office of Research on Women's Health, Office of the Director, 
National Institutes of Health, Building 1, Room 201, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 402-1770.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
comittee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed on 
this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: www4.od.nih.gov/orwh/, where an agenda and any additional 
information for the meeting will be posted when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.14, 
Intramural Research Training Award; 93.22, Clinical Research Loan 
Repayment Program for Individuals from Disadvantaged Backgrounds; 
93.232, Loan Repayment Program for Research Generally; 93.39, 
Academic Research Enhancement Award; 93.936, NIH Acquired 
Immunodeficiency Syndrome Research Loan Repayment Program; 93.187, 
Undergraduate Scholarship Program for Individuals from Disadvantaged 
Backgrounds, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 19, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-23973 Filed 10-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
### §2004. National Research Council study

#### (a) Agreement for Study

The Secretary shall offer to enter into an agreement with the National Research Council under which the National Research Council shall—

(1) conduct a study of the progress made under the methane hydrate research and development program implemented under this chapter; and

(2) make recommendations for future methane hydrate research and development needs.

#### (b) Report

Not later than September 30, 2009, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report containing the findings and recommendations of the National Research Council under this section.

(Pub. L. 106–193, §5, as added Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, §968(a), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 898.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5 of Pub. L. 106–193 was set out in a note under section 1902 of this title prior to the general amendment of Pub. L. 106–193 by Pub. L. 109–58.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       8,576,055
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,677,424
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (310,453)
<INVENTORY>                                    672,691
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,773,978
<PP&E>                                       1,220,528
<DEPRECIATION>                               (660,904)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,358,791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,761,884
<BONDS>                                      1,198,254
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          142,890
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,215,901
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,358,791
<SALES>                                      9,079,647
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,079,647
<CGS>                                        3,573,695
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,948,849
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (185,260)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             527,967
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,758,604)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,785,604)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,785,604)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    ($1.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($1.00)


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 13

- 00479

- CV C ITY OF HEWITT , T exas and Police Chief James Barton, Appellants

v. Danny Danny P OWELL , Appellee
Fr om the 414th Judicial District Court, McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011

- 4376

- 5 Honorable Vicki Lynn Menard, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Delivered and Filed: March 19, 2014
REVERSED AND REMANDED The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal stating they have reached a settlement, and requesting that we set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the c ause to the trial court for rendition of a judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. The parties further request expedited issuance of the mandate for good

cause . See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 18.1(c). The motion is granted. The judgment of the trial court signed on April 4, 2013 is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2(d). H aving found good cause , the clerk of the cou rt is04

- 13

- 00479

- CV instructed to issue the mandate immediately. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 18.1(c). Costs of appeal are taxed against the parties who incurred them.

PER CURIAM

- 2

-
The State 

of Wyoming 

Department of Environmental Quality 

Jim Geringer, Governor Herschler Building * 122 West 25th Street e Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002

ADMIN/OUTREACH ABANDONED MINES AIR QUALITY INDUSTRIAL SITING LAND QUALITY SOLID & HAZ. WASTE WATER QUALITY 

(307) 777-7758 (307) 777-6145 (307) 777-7391 (307) 777-7368 (307) 777-7756 (307) 777-7752 (307) 777-7781 

FAX 777-3610 FAX 777-6462 FAX 777-5616 FAX 777-6937 FAX 777-5864 FAX 777-5973 FAX 777-5973 

August 9, 2002 

Michael Layton 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

OWFN 

11555 Rockville Pike 

Rockville, MD 20852 

RE: Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Uranium In Situ Leach Operations 

Dear Mr. Layton: 

This letter confirms our earlier telephone conversation concerning Wyoming's desire to 

pursue a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). 

The purpose of the MOU is to minimize duplication of effort concerning the regulation of ground 

water in situ leach operations. With the MOU, the NRC would compare the state's technical review 

with the NRC Standard Review Plan and rely upon the state's analysis for NRC licensing actions. 

We support this concept and look forward working with you in this endeavor. 

Sincerely, 

Rihad/.Ch. or or 

Administrator 

Land Quality Division 

xc: Roberta Hoy
## SUBTITLE III—FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Chap.
Sec.
31.
Public Debt
3101
33.
Depositing, Keeping, and Paying Money
3301
35.
Accounting and Collection
3501
37.
Claims
3701
38.
Administrative Remedies for False Claims and Statements
3801
39.
Prompt Payment
3901

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–509, title VI, §6103(b), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1948, added item for chapter 38.

**1983**—Pub. L. 97–452, §1(18)(B), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2477, added item for chapter 39.
### §158. Deposits by Library of Congress Trust Fund Board with Treasurer of United States

In the absence of any specification to the contrary, the board may deposit the principal sum, in cash, with the Treasurer of the United States as a permanent loan to the United States Treasury, and the Treasurer shall thereafter credit such deposit with interest at a rate which is the higher of the rate of 4 per centum per annum or a rate which is 0.25 percentage points less than a rate determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, taking into consideration the current average market yield on outstanding long-term marketable obligations of the United States, adjusted to the nearest one-eighth of 1 per centum, payable semi-annually, such interest, as income, being subject to disbursement by the Librarian of Congress for the purposes specified: Provided, however, That the total of such principal sums at any time so held by the Treasurer under this authorization shall not exceed the sum of $10,000,000.

(Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 423, §2, formerly §1, 43 Stat. 1107; renumbered §2, Apr. 13, 1936, ch. 213, 49 Stat. 1205; amended June 23, 1936, ch. 734, 49 Stat. 1894; Pub. L. 87–522, July 3, 1962, 76 Stat. 135; Pub. L. 94–289, May 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 521.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of third par. of section 2 of act Mar. 3, 1925. First, second, and fourth pars. of section 2 are classified to sections 156, 157, and 158a of this title, respectively.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–289 substituted "a rate which is the higher of the rate of 4 per centum per annum or a rate which is 0.25 percentage points less than a rate determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, taking into consideration the current average market yield on outstanding long-term marketable obligations of the United States, adjusted to the nearest one-eighth of 1 per centum" for "the rate of 4 per centum per annum".

1962—Pub. L. 87–522 increased the total amount of deposits which can be held by the Treasurer from $5,000,000 to $10,000,000.

1936—Act June 23, 1936, substituted "in the absence of any specification to the contrary" for "Should any gift or bequest so provide".
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-03-011 March 12, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC SPECIAL INSPECTION TEAM TO REVIEW

MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SHUTDOWN, EQUIPMENT PROBLEMS

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has sent a special inspection team to the Millstone Unit 2

nuclear power plant to review a shutdown and equipment problems that occurred at the facility on

March 7. Millstone Unit 2 is located in Waterford, Conn., and operated by Dominion Nuclear.

 Four NRC inspectors will be at the plant this week and during the week of March 24 with the

goal of assessing performance related to the initiating event, mitigative actions, equipment response

and post-event evaluations.

 At 2:39 p.m. on March 7, Millstone Unit 2 experienced an automatic reactor shutdown. The

shutdown was complicated principally due to problems involving several charging pumps, which are

used to maintain the proper level of coolant in the plant’s reactor coolant system. At 3:16 p.m., plant

officials declared an Unusual Event – the lowest of the NRC’s four levels of emergency classification –

in response to leakage from relief valves on the charging pumps. A second Unusual Event was

declared at 8:49 p.m. because the charging system complications delayed the plant cooldown beyond

the time allowed by the plant’s technical specifications.

 The Unusual Events were terminated at 1:46 a.m. on March 8 after the required plant cooldown

was achieved. NRC inspectors monitored the plant throughout the events.

 The NRC team will document its findings in an inspection report that will be issued within 45

days of the close of the review.

 ###
§ 1215.28 Administrative offset. ( a ) The MSPB may collect debts owed by administrative offset if: ( 1 ) The debt is certain in amount;
( 2 ) Efforts to obtain direct payment have been, or would most likely be unsuccessful, or the MSPB and the debtor agree to the offset;
( 3 ) Offset is cost effective or has significant deterrent value; and
( 4 ) Offset is best suited to further and protect the Government's interest.
( b ) The MSPB may offset a debt owed to another Federal agency from amounts due or payable by the MSPB to the debtor or request another Federal agency to offset a debt owed to the MSPB;
( c ) Prior to initiating administrative offset, the MSPB will send the debtor written notice of the following: ( 1 ) The nature and amount of the debt and the agency's intention to collect the debt by offset 30 days from the date the notice was mailed if neither payment nor a satisfactory response is received by that date;
( 2 ) The debtor's right to an opportunity to submit a good faith alternative repayment schedule to inspect and copy agency records pertaining to the debt, to request a review of the determination of indebtedness; and to enter into a written agreement to repay the debt; and
( 3 ) The applicable interest.
( d ) The MSPB may effect an administrative offset against a payment to be made to a debtor prior to the completion of the procedures required by paragraph (c) of this section if: ( 1 ) Failure of offset would substantially prejudice the Government's ability to collect the debt; and
( 2 ) The time before the payment is to be made does not reasonably permit completion of those procedures.
DEPA^IT 

TRANo:^L 

928 Cresenwood Rd 

East Lansing, Ml 48823-4118 

February 9,2012 

RE: Docket No. FAA-2012-0089 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Dept. of Transportation 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0089 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

West Building Grand Floor, Room W-120140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Sirs or Mesdames, 

As a resident of the greater Lansing, Michigan area, I am concerned that Sun Country Airline may lose its gate space 

at Reagan Airport. This will mean that Lansing will lose its nonstop flight fiiom Lansing's Capitol City Airport to 

Washington. 

We lost nonstop service to DC many years ago, causing added expense to many residents who have had to drive (or 

fly) to Detroit. Its also inconvenient as it's time consuming and a hassle with vehicular (and Metro Detroits airport) 

traffic. We were delighted a direct flight was recently reinstated with Sun Country's service. Furthemiore, our Lansing 

airport needs the business for financial strength and the Lansing area needs to facilitate all the incoming business it 

can encourage. 

Please continue to allow Sun Country Airlines to have a presence at Reagan Airport. 

Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

llene R. Schechter