Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2011 / Proposed Rules 77739 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R01–OAR–2011–0879; A–1–FRL– 

9505–9] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Massachusetts and New Hampshire; 

Determination of Attainment of the 

One-Hour Ozone Standard 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to 

determine that the Boston-LawrenceWorcester (Eastern Massachusetts), MA– 

NH serious one-hour ozone 

nonattainment area met the applicable 

deadline of November 15, 2007, for 

attaining the one-hour National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) 

for ozone. This proposed determination 

is based upon complete, certified, 

quality-assured ambient air quality 

monitoring data for the 2005–2007 

monitoring period showing that the area 

had an expected ozone exceedance rate 

below the level of the now revoked onehour ozone NAAQS during that period 

and therefore attained the standard by 

its applicable deadline. EPA is 

proposing this determination under the 

Clean Air Act. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before January 13, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID Number EPA– 

R01–OAR–2011–0879 by one of the 

following methods: 

1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: arnold.anne@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (617) 918–0047. 

4. Mail: ‘‘Docket Identification 

Number EPA–R01–OAR–2011- 0879,’’ 

Anne Arnold, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, EPA New England 

Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square, 

Suite 100 (mail code: OEP05–2), Boston, 

MA 02109–3912. 

5. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver 

your comments to: Anne Arnold, 

Manager, Air Quality Planning Unit, 

Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 

New England Regional Office, 5 Post 

Office Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA 

02109–3912. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Regional Office’s 

normal hours of operation. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, 

excluding legal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R01–OAR–2011- 

0879. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit through http:// 

www.regulations.gov, or email, 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected. The http:// 

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov your email address 

will be automatically captured and 

included as part of the comment that is 

placed in the public docket and made 

available on the Internet. If you submit 

an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the http:// 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 

New England Regional Office, 5 Post 

Office Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA. 

EPA requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, 

excluding legal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Richard P. Burkhart, Air Quality 

Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, EPA New England 

Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square, 

Suite 100, Boston, MA 02109–3912, 

telephone number (617) 918–1664, fax 

number (617) 918–0664, email 

Burkhart.Richard@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. 

Organization of this document. The 

following outline is provided to aid in 

locating information in this preamble: 

I. What is EPA proposing? 

II. What is the background for this proposed 

action? 

III. What is EPA’s analysis of data for 

purposes of determining attainment of 

the one-hour ozone standard? 

A. How does EPA compute whether an 

area meets the one-hour ozone standard? 

B. EPA’s Analysis of the One-Hour Ozone 

Data for the Boston-Lawrence-Worcester, 

MA-NH Area 

IV. Proposed Determination 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What is EPA proposing? 

EPA is proposing to determine that 

the Boston-Lawrence-Worcester (Eastern 

Massachusetts), MA-NH area attained 

the one hour ozone National Ambient 

Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) by the 

applicable attainment date, November 

15, 2007. This proposed determination 

is based upon complete, quality-assured 

and certified air quality monitoring data 

for the 2005 through 2007 ozone 

seasons. 

II. What is the background for this 

proposed action? 

EPA designated the Boston-LawrenceWorcester, MA-NH area as 

nonattainment for one-hour ozone 

following the enactment of the Clean 

Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1990. 

Most areas of the country that EPA 

designated nonattainment for the onehour ozone NAAQS were classified by 

operation of law as marginal, moderate, 

serious, severe, or extreme, depending 

on the severity of the area’s air quality 

problem. (See CAA sections 107(d)(1)(C) 

and 181(a).) The Boston-LawrenceWorcester, MA-NH area was classified 

as serious. The one-hour ozone 

attainment deadline for the area was 

initially set for November 15, 1999 and 

later extended to November 15, 2007. 

See 67 FR 72574 (December 6, 2002). 

The Boston-Lawrence-Worcester, MANH one-hour ozone nonattainment area 

consists of all Massachusetts’ counties 

east of, and including Worcester 

County, MA; along with parts of 

Hillsborough and Rockingham Counties 

in southern New Hampshire. (See 40 

CFR 81.322, and 81.330.) 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

77740 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

1Final Rule to Implement the 8-Hour Ozone 

National Ambient Air Quality Standard—Phase 1, 

69 FR 23951 (April 30, 2004). 

On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 38856), EPA 

promulgated a new standard for ozone 

based on an 8-hour average 

concentration (the ‘‘1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS’’). EPA designated and 

classified most areas of the country 

under the eight-hour ozone NAAQS in 

an April 30, 2004 final rule (69 FR 

23858). EPA designated BostonLawrence-Worcester, MA as 

nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS. At the time of 

designation the area did not meet the 

one-hour ozone standard. In addition, 

parts of southern New Hampshire were 

designated nonattainment for the 8-hour 

NAAQS. However, unlike the one-hour 

ozone standard, in the case of the 1997 

8-hour ozone standard, southern New 

Hampshire was designated as a separate 

ozone nonattainment area. (See 40 CFR 

81.330.) 

On April 30, 2004, EPA issued a final 

rule (69 FR 23951) entitled ‘‘Final Rule 

To Implement the 8-Hour Ozone 

National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard—Phase 1,’’ referred to as the 

Phase 1 Rule. Among other matters, this 

rule revoked the one-hour ozone 

NAAQS in most areas of the country, 

effective June 15, 2005. (See 40 CFR 

50.9(b); 69 FR at 23996; and 70 FR 

44470, August 3, 2005.) The Phase 1 

Rule also set forth how anti-backsliding 

principles will ensure continued 

progress toward attainment of the eighthour ozone NAAQS by identifying 

which one-hour requirements remain 

applicable in an area after revocation of 

the one-hour ozone NAAQS. Although 

EPA revoked the one-hour ozone 

standard (effective June 15, 2005), eighthour ozone nonattainment areas remain 

subject to certain one-hour antibacksliding requirements based on their 

one-hour ozone classification.1 The 

United States Court of Appeals for the 

District of Columbia Circuit 

subsequently determined that EPA 

should have retained certain additional 

measures as one-hour ozone antibacksliding requirements. These include 

one-hour ozone contingency measures 

under section 172(c)(9), which are to be 

implemented in the event an area fails 

to attain by its one-hour ozone 

attainment date. South Coast Air 

Quality Management District v. EPA, 

472 F.3d 882 (DC Cir. 2006) rehearing 

denied 489 F.3d 1245. EPA is proposing 

here to determine that the BostonLawrence-Worcester area attained the 

one-hour ozone standard by the 

applicable attainment date. Thus, if EPA 

finalizes its proposed determination, 

there will be no requirement to 

implement one-hour ozone contingency 

measures for failure to attain or any 

additional one-hour ozone antibacksliding requirements. 

III. What is EPA’s analysis of data for 

purposes of determining attainment of 

the one-hour ozone standard? 

A. How does EPA compute whether an 

area has attained the one-hour ozone 

standard? 

Although the one-hour ozone NAAQS 

as promulgated in 40 CFR 50.9 includes 

no discussion of specific data handling 

conventions, EPA’s publicly articulated 

position and the approach long since 

universally adopted by the air quality 

management community is that the 

interpretation of the one-hour ozone 

standard requires rounding ambient air 

quality data consistent with the stated 

level of the standard, which is 0.12 parts 

per million (ppm). 40 CFR 50.9(a) states 

that: ‘‘The level of the national one-hour 

primary and secondary ambient air 

quality standards for ozone * * * is 

0.12 parts per million. * * * The 

standard is attained when the expected 

number of days per calendar year with 

maximum hourly average 

concentrations of 0.12 parts per million 

* * * is equal to or less than 1, as 

determined by appendix H to this part.’’ 

Thus, compliance with the NAAQS is 

based on comparison of air quality 

concentrations with the standard and on 

how many days that standard has been 

exceeded, adjusted for the number of 

missing days. 

For comparison with the NAAQS, 

EPA has communicated the data 

handling conventions for the one-hour 

ozone NAAQS in guidance documents. 

As early as 1979, EPA issued guidance 

stating that the level of our NAAQS 

dictates the number of significant 

figures to be used in determining 

whether the standard was exceeded. 

The stated level of the standard is taken 

as defining the number of significant 

figures to be used in comparisons with 

the standard. For example, a standard 

level of 0.12 ppm means that 

measurements are to be rounded to two 

decimal places (0.005 rounds up), and, 

therefore, 0.125 ppm is the smallest 

concentration value in excess of the 

level of the standard. (See, ‘‘Guideline 

for the Interpretation of Ozone Air 

Quality Standards,’’ EPA–450/4–79– 

003, OAQPS No. 1.2–108, January 

1979.) EPA has consistently applied the 

rounding convention in this 1979 

guideline. See, 68 FR 19111, April 17, 

2003; 68 FR 62043, October 31, 2003; 

and 69 FR 21719, April 22, 2004. Then, 

EPA determines attainment status under 

the one-hour ozone NAAQS on the basis 

of the annual average number of 

expected exceedances of the NAAQS 

over a three-year period. (See, 60 FR 

3349, January 17, 1995 and ‘‘General 

Preamble for the Implementation of 

Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments 

of 1990,’’ at 57 FR 13506, April 16, 1992 

(‘‘General Preamble’’).) EPA’s 

determination is based upon data that 

have been collected and quality-assured 

in accordance with 40 CFR part 58, and 

recorded in EPA’s Air Quality System 

(AQS) database. To account for missing 

data, the procedures found in appendix 

H to 40 CFR part 50 are used to adjust 

the actual number of monitored 

exceedances of the standard to yield the 

annual number of expected exceedances 

(‘‘expected exceedance days’’) at an air 

quality monitoring site. We determine if 

an area meets the one-hour ozone 

NAAQS by calculating, at each monitor, 

the average expected number of days 

over the standard per year (i.e., ‘‘average 

number of expected exceedance days’’) 

during the applicable 3-year period. See, 

the General Preamble, 57 FR 13498, 

April 16, 1992. The term ‘‘exceedance’’ 

is used throughout this document to 

describe a daily maximum ozone 

measurement that is equal to or exceeds 

0.125 ppm which is the level of the 

standard after rounding. An area 

violates the ozone standard if, over a 

consecutive 3-year period, more than 3 

days of expected exceedances occur at 

the same monitor. For more information 

please refer to 40 CFR 50.9 ‘‘National 

one-hour primary and secondary 

ambient air quality standards for ozone’’ 

and ‘‘Interpretation of the one-hour 

Primary and Secondary National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards for 

Ozone’’ (40 CFR part 50, appendix H). 

B. EPA’s Analysis of the One-Hour 

Ozone Data for the Boston-LawrenceWorcester, MA-NH Area 

Table 1 shows the results of one-hour 

ozone data for all the ozone monitors in 

the Boston-Lawrence-Worcester, MANH area for the three-year period 2005– 

2007. In short, if the three-year average 

expected exceedances rate, shown in the 

far right column, is less than or equal to 

1.0, the site meets the one-hour ozone 

NAAQS. If all sites in the area are 

shown to meet the one-hour ozone 

NAAQS, it can be determined that the 

area has attained the one-hour ozone 

NAAQS. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2011 / Proposed Rules 77741 

TABLE 1—AVERAGE EXPECTED EXCEEDANCE RATE FOR THE ONE-HOUR OZONE STANDARD IN THE BOSTON-LAWRENCEWORCESTER, MA-NH AREA FOR 2005–2007 

EPA AQS ID Site Year 

Exceedances (days over 0.124 ppm) 

Actual Adjusted for 

missing data 

3-Year average 

expected exceedance rate 

Massachusetts: 

250250041 ......................... Boston-Long Island ................... 2005 0 0.0 0.0 

2006 0 0.0 

2007 0 0.0 

250250042 ......................... Boston-Roxbury ........................ 2005 0 0.0 0.0 

2006 0 0.0 

2007 0 0.0 

250170009 ......................... Chelmsford ............................... 2005 0 0.0 0.0 

2006 0 0.0 

2007 0 0.0 

250051002 ......................... Fairhaven .................................. 2005 0 0.0 0.7 

2006 2 2.0 

2007 0 0.0 

250095005 ......................... Haverhill .................................... 2005 0 0.0 0.0 

2006 0 0.0 

2007 0 0.0 

250092006 ......................... Lynn .......................................... 2005 0 0.0 0.0 

2006 0 0.0 

2007 0 0.0 

250213003 ......................... Milton ........................................ 2005 1 0.0 0.3 

2006 0 0.0 

2007 0 0.0 

250094004 ......................... Newbury .................................... 2005 0 1.0 0.0 

2006 0 0.0 

2007 0 0.0 

250070001 ......................... Oak Bluffs ................................. 2005 0 0.0 0.7 

2006 2 2.1 

2007 0 0.0 

250171102 ......................... Stow .......................................... 2005 0 0.0 0.0 

2006 0 0.0 

2007 0 0.0 

250010002 ......................... Truro ......................................... 2005 0 0.0 0.0 

2006 0 0.0 

2007 0 0.0 

250270015 ......................... Worcester ................................. 2005 0 0.0 0.0 

2006 0 0.0 

2007 0 0.0 

New Hampshire: 

330111011 ......................... Nashua ..................................... 2005 0 0.0 0.0 

2006 0 0.0 

2007 0 0.0 

As shown in Table 1, the BostonLawrence-Worcester, MA–NH one-hour 

ozone nonattainment area attained the 

one-hour ozone NAAQS by its 

attainment deadline of November 15, 

2007, since all ozone monitors had 

expected exceedances rates below 1.0. 

Thus EPA is proposing to determine 

that, based on the 2005–2007 complete, 

quality-assured and certified ozone data 

in the AQS database, the BostonLawrence-Worcester, MA–NH area met 

the 1-hour ozone NAAQS by its 

applicable attainment date of November 

15, 2007. 

IV. Proposed Determination 

For the reasons set forth in this notice, 

EPA is proposing to determine that the 

Boston-Lawrence-Worcester, MA–NH 

one-hour ozone nonattainment area met 

its applicable one-hour ozone 

attainment date of November 15, 2007, 

based on 2005–2007 complete, certified 

and quality-assured ozone monitoring 

data. EPA is soliciting public comments 

on the issues discussed in this notice or 

on other relevant matters. EPA will 

consider these comments before final 

action. Interested parties may 

participate in the Federal rulemaking 

procedure by submitting written 

comments to the EPA New England 

Regional Office listed in the ADDRESSES

section of this Federal Register. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

This action proposes to make a 

determination of attainment based on 

monitored air quality data, and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this proposed action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

77742 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 240 / Wednesday, December 14, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this action does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: December 6, 2011. 

H. Curtis Spalding, 

Regional Administrator, EPA New England. 

[FR Doc. 2011–32059 Filed 12–13–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 52 and 70 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2011–0822; FRL–9505–7] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; State of 

Missouri 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) and 

Operating Permits Program revisions 

submitted by the state of Missouri 

which align the state’s rule entitled 

‘‘Submission of Emission Data, 

Emission Fees and Process Information’’ 

with the Federal Air Emissions 

Reporting Requirements Rule (AERR). 

DATES: Comments on this proposed 

action must be received in writing by 

January 13, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2011–0822, by mail to Amy 

Bhesania, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Air Planning and Development 

Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas 

City, Kansas 66101. Comments may also 

be submitted electronically or through 

hand delivery/courier by following the 

detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES

section of the direct final rule located in 

the rules section of this Federal 

Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amy Bhesania at (913) 551–7147, or by 

email at bhesania.amy@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

final rules section of the Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the State’s 

SIP revision as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

revision amendment and anticipates no 

relevant adverse comments to this 

action. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no relevant adverse comments 

are received in response to this action, 

no further activity is contemplated in 

relation to this action. If EPA receives 

relevant adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed action. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period 

on this action. Any parties interested in 

commenting on this action should do so 

at this time. Please note that if EPA 

receives adverse comment on part of 

this rule and if that part can be severed 

from the remainder of the rule, EPA may 

adopt as final those parts of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. For additional information, 

see the direct final rule which is located 

in the rules section of this Federal 

Register. 

Dated: November 28, 2011. 

Karl Brooks, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

[FR Doc. 2011–31908 Filed 12–13–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 136 

[EPA–HQ–OW–2010–0192; FRL–9504–2] 

Guidelines Establishing Test 

Procedures for the Analysis of 

Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act; 

Analysis and Sampling Procedures; 

Notice of Data Availability 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of data availability. 

SUMMARY: On September 23, 2010, EPA 

proposed to approve a number of new 

and revised test procedures (i.e., 

analytical methods) for measuring 

pollutants under the Clean Water Act. 

Today’s notice announces the 

availability of new data on an analytical 

method for the measurement of oil and 

grease that EPA described in the earlier 

notice but did not propose to approve it 

for use. This notice discusses how EPA 

is considering revising its proposed 

regulatory requirements for this method. 

EPA is soliciting comment only on 

EPA’s consideration of this method. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before February 13, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

2010–0192, by one of the following 

methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: OW-docket@epamail.epa.gov 

Attention Docket ID No. OW–2010– 

0192. 

• Mail: Water Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Mailcode: 28221T, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460. 

• Hand Delivery: EPA Water Center, 

EPA West Building, Room B102, 1301 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC, Attention Docket ID No. OW–2010– 

0192. Such deliveries are only accepted 

during the Docket’s normal hours of 

operation, and special arrangements 

should be made for deliveries of boxed 

information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2010– 

0192. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS