alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-04-012 March 19, 2004

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO MEET WITH NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT

 TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE OF COOPER NUCLEAR STATION

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of the

Nebraska Public Power District on Tuesday, April 6, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual

assessment of safety performance at the Cooper Nuclear Station. The facility is located near

Brownville, NB.

The meeting will be held at 7 p.m. in the Brownville Concert Hall, Atlantic Avenue and

Second Street, in Brownville. The public is invited to observe the meeting and NRC officials

will be available before the conclusion of the meeting to answer questions from the public on the

safety performance of the plant.

The performance period to be discussed is January 1 to December 31, 2003. In addition,

the NRC staff will provide an overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process works.

A letter from the NRC to Nebraska Public Power District officials addresses the

performance of the plant during this period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. 

It is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/cns_2003q4.pdf.

Overall, the plant operated safely during the past year. On January 30, 2003, the NRC

issued a Confirmatory Action Letter to Nebraska Public Power District to confirm commitments

made by the licensee to address long-standing performance deficiencies. Cooper has corrected

weaknesses in its emergency preparedness program and is working on improving the

performance of plant workers, the identification and correction of plant problems, and the

condition and reliability of plant equipment. The NRC will continue to monitor the licensee’s

actions in these areas. 
During the fourth quarter of 2003, Cooper exceeded an NRC threshold for the number of

unplanned plant shutdowns. The NRC plans to conduct a supplemental inspection to review

actions taken by the licensee to address this issue. In addition, it is monitoring steps taken by the

licensee to address an unusually high re-qualification exam failure rate by licensed plant

operators. 

Current performance indicators for Cooper Nuclear Station are available on the NRC web

site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CNS/cns_chart.html .

###
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-04-031 June 29, 2004

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE 

OF SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION JULY 29

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of

Southern California Edison Co. on July 29 to discuss the results of the agency’s assessment of

safety performance at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. The plant is located near San

Clemente, California.

The meeting will be held at 7 p.m. at the Country Plaza Inn, 35 Via Pico Plaza, San

Clemente. The public is invited to observe the meeting and NRC officials will be available

before the conclusion of the meeting to answer questions from the public.

"The meeting will give area residents a chance to hear first-hand how NRC inspectors

think the plant has been run from a safety standpoint. It is the plant's responsibility to operate in

a safe manner, and this is our report card on how they've done in the past year," said NRC

Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallett. 

The performance period to be discussed is January 1 to December 31, 2003. In addition,

NRC staff will provide an overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process works.

A letter from the NRC to Southern California Edison discusses the performance of the

plant during this period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on

the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/sano_2003q4.pdf .

The NRC concluded that the plant operated safely last year and will continue to receive

the normal baseline inspections during 2004. 

With regard to security issues, the letter points out that NRC has issued several orders and

threat advisories to enhance security capabilities at all nuclear power plants and improve guard

force readiness since the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. The agency has also conducted
-2-

inspections to review the implementation of these requirements and has monitored the action of

plant operators in response to changing plant conditions. The NRC will continue security

inspections during 2004.

Current performance indicators for San Onofre Unit 2 are available on the NRC web site

at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SANO2/sano2_chart.html . Current

performance indicators for San Onofre Unit 3 are available at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SANO3/sano3_chart.html .

###
### §2134. Art exhibits

No work of art or manufacture other than the property of the United States shall be exhibited in the National Statuary Hall, the Rotunda, Emancipation Hall of the Capitol Visitor Center, or the corridors of the Capitol.

(R.S. §1815; Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 130, 18 Stat. 376; Mar. 3, 1879, ch. 182, 20 Stat. 391; Pub. L. 110–437, title I, §101(f)(2), Oct. 20, 2008, 122 Stat. 4985.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 189 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

Section is based on act Mar. 3, 1879, popularly known as the "Sundry Civil Appropriation Act, fiscal year 1879".

R.S. §1815 derived from act July 20, 1868, ch. 176, §6, 15 Stat. 110.

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–437 inserted "Emancipation Hall of the Capitol Visitor Center," after "Rotunda,".
### §54. Liability for damages to stock raising and homestead entries by mining activities

Notwithstanding the provisions of any Act of Congress to the contrary, any person who on and after June 21, 1949 prospects for, mines, or removes by strip or open pit mining methods, any minerals from any land included in a stock raising or other homestead entry or patent, and who had been liable under such an existing Act only for damages caused thereby to the crops or improvements of the entryman or patentee, shall also be liable for any damage that may be caused to the value of the land for grazing by such prospecting for, mining, or removal of minerals. Nothing in this section shall be considered to impair any vested right in existence on June 21, 1949.

(June 21, 1949, ch. 232, §5, 63 Stat. 215.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Similar Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in act June 17, 1949, ch. 221, §2, 63 Stat. 201.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Louis LeCalsey, III, President and Chief Executive Officer of TufcoTechnologies, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TufcoTechnologies, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this Report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this Report is beingprepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: August 13, 2004
   /s/ Louis LeCalsey, III
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-02-023 April 1, 2002

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404) 562-4416 E-mail: opa2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417

 

NRC TO MEET WITH PROGRESS ENERGY/FLORIDA POWER OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS

SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Progress Energy/Florida Power

officials on Thursday, April 11, to discuss the results of NRC’s annual assessment of safety

performance at the Crystal River nuclear power plant, located in Crystal River, Florida.

The meeting will be held at 1:00 p.m. at the Crystal River plant Training Center on Venable

Street in Crystal River. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be

available before the meeting is adjourned to answer any questions.

A letter sent from the NRC’s Regional Administrator to Progress Energy/Florida Power, which

addresses plant safety performance during the previous year and forms the basis of the meeting

discussion, is available from Region II Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/cr_2001q4.pdf

Current information for the Crystal River plant is available at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CR3/cr3_chart.html

###
### §131. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Jan. 11, 1915, ch. 9, 38 Stat. 792, provided for perfection under placer mining laws of locations made in good faith prior to Jan. 11, 1915, on public lands containing deposits of phosphate rock.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report of The Newark Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the year ended April 30, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Joseph E. Byrne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition ofthe Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented. 

Dated: August 13, 2008

 

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure statement. 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 64819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27302]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AC19-30-000]


Virginia Electric and Power Company; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on November 28, 2018, Virginia Electric and Power 
Company filed a request for approval to use Account 439, authorized by 
the Financial Accounting Standards Board.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
eLibrary link and is available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
website that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d7b786f7e7253515453586e484d4d524f497d5b584f5e135a524b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="692f2c3b2a26070500070c3a1c1919061b1d290f0c1b0a470e061f">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comments: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on December 18, 2018.

    Dated: December 12, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-27302 Filed 12-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

American Systems Corporation 

Under Contract No. N62583-08-D-O 136 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ASBCA No. 60320 

Joseph G. Billings, Esq. 

Katherine B. Hill, Esq. 

Miles & Stockbridge P.C. 

Baltimore, MD 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Ronald J. Borro, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

Anthony K. Hicks, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 14 July 2016 

/ MARK N. STEMPLE 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60320, Appeal of American Systems 

Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-00-39 June 13, 2000

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETINGS IN FLORIDA JUNE 28 ON CHANGES IN

REACTOR OVERSIGHT AND LATEST ASSESSMENT OF TURKEY POINT PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled two public meetings for Wednesday,

June 28 -- one on the latest performance review results for Florida Power & Light’s Turkey Point

nuclear power plant, and the other meeting on the NRC's reactor oversight process.

The first meeting will be held at 1:30 p.m. EDT at the Turkey Point Nuclear Training Center at

the site near Homestead, Florida. During the meeting, NRC staff members will discuss Turkey Point’s

latest plant performance review results, and will be available after the meeting to answer any questions

from media or members of the public.

The Plant Performance Reviews are used to evaluate safety performance information and

identify any changes in plant performance so the NRC can allocate inspection resources appropriately.

The text of each PPR letter, including the one on Turkey Point, is available from the NRC Office of

Public Affairs and has been posted on the NRC web site at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr.

Current performance information for Turkey Point is available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/TP3/tp3_chart.html and

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/TP4/tp4_chart.html.

The second meeting will begin at 7 p.m. EDT on June 28 in the Homestead City Hall. NRC

officials will describe the new oversight process which began at the Turkey Point plant in April.

Members of the public will have the opportunity to ask questions during the meeting.

The new oversight process uses more objective, timely, and safety-significant criteria in

assessing performance, while seeking to more effectively and efficiently regulate the industry. Under

the new process, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional office-based personnel are

supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance indicators. These

performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant operations, including the viability of

redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection, and security measures.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC's web site every three months. The safety significance of each inspection finding or performance

indicator is characterized by a color -- green, white, yellow, or red.
The NRC response to the inspection findings and performance indicators will be based on the

significance of the items. A green finding receives normal NRC oversight, while white, yellow, or red

assessments receive increasing NRC involvement. Multiple red findings could result in a plant

shutdown.

A plain language summary of the reactor oversight process is available from the NRC Office of

Public Affairs or on the web site at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

###
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-02-012 March 13, 2002

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: opa2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417 

 

NRC TO MEET WITH DUKE ENERGY OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS

SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT McGUIRE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Duke Energy officials on

Thursday, March 21, to discuss the results of NRC's annual assessment of safety performance at the

McGuire nuclear power plant.

The meeting will be held at 1:00 p.m. in the Energy Explorium at the plant site. The public is

invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be available before the meeting is adjourned to

answer any questions.

A letter sent from the NRCís Regional Administrator to Duke Energy, which addresses plant

safety performance during the previous year and forms the basis of the meeting discussion, is available

from Region II Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/mcg_2001q4.pdf

Current information for the two units at the McGuire plant is available at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/MCG1/mcg1_chart.html

and www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/MCG2/mcg2_chart.html

###
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kenneth M. Pusateri, General Manager, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2901, (800) 788-4016. This is a toll-free number. 

Dated: February 2, 2004. 

John T. Conway, 

Chairman. 

[FR Doc. 04-2406 Filed 2-2-04; 10:59 am] 

BILLING CODE 3670-01-P
Case 1:20-cv-23365-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2020 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:20-cv-23365-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2020 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:20-cv-23365-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2020 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:20-cv-23365-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2020 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:20-cv-23365-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2020 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:20-cv-23365-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2020 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:20-cv-23365-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2020 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:20-cv-23365-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2020 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:20-cv-23365-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2020 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:20-cv-23365-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2020 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:20-cv-23365-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2020 Page 11 of 11