alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-98-23 April 3, 1998

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC PLANS PERFORMANCE REVIEW MEETING AT

ABB COMBUSTION ENGINEERING FUEL PLANT IN HEMATITE, MISSOURI

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

officials of the ABB Combustion Engineering, Inc., commercial

nuclear fuel facility in Hematite, Missouri, on Wednesday, April

14, to discuss the plant’s regulatory performance.

The meeting will be at 1 p.m. at the company’s Hematite

Nuclear Manufacturing Facility, Building 110, 3300 State Road P.

It is open for public observation. NRC officials will be

available at its conclusion to answer questions from the news

media and other interested observers.

NRC officials will discuss a Licensee Performance Review in

which the agency evaluated performance in five areas -- safety

operations, safeguards, radiological controls, facility support,

and licensing activities -- in order to form a basis for

establishing the NRC’s inspection program at the facility for the

next year.

The assessment covers the period from January 1, 1996,

through January 31 of this year.

The NRC review concludes that the facility’s performance in

radiological controls was “very good” and the remaining four

areas -- safety operations, safeguards, facility support, and

licensing activities -- were evaluated as “generally adequate.”

NRC Regional Administrator A. Bill Beach, in a letter to

the company, noted that performance “was inconsistent throughout

the assessment period in nuclear criticality, chemical and fire

safety, and material control and accounting.” Therefore, he

added, continued improvements are needed in these major areas to

enhance overall performance.

Mr. Beach continued: “Our previous licensee performance

review identified your self-assessment program as an area needing

improvement. During this review period, your self-assessment

program, internal and external audits, and subsequent corrective
actions continued to lack the breadth and depth necessary to

enhance overall facility performance.”

But he also told the company: “Procedural quality has

improved and now provides a generally adequate level of guidance

and detail. Current enhancements to the maintenance area, and

the newly established maintenance management team, responsible

for developing an effective preventive maintenance program,

demonstrate a commitment to improve the maintenance of plant

equipment. Our review indicated an improvement in material

condition, radiation protection, housekeeping, and procedural

compliance at your facility since the last review period.”

Based on the review, the NRC has decided to increase

inspection efforts in the areas of safety operations and also

focus on the company’s corrective action program for all the

major areas. Additionally, the NRC will decrease its

radiological controls inspection efforts.

####

Note: A copy of the full report is available for review on the

NRC’s internet web site at http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3639]

In accordance with a notice received from the Department of Homeland Security—Federal Emergency Management Agency—effective September 27, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning September 14, 2004, and continuing through September 27, 2004.

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.*, the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is December 6, 2004 and for economic injury the deadline is July 7, 2005.                

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008)

Dated: October 15, 2004.

Herbert L. Mitchell,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 04-23638 Filed 10-21-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE REGISTRANT'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       4,296,774
<SECURITIES>                                 2,451,140
<RECEIVABLES>                                  390,242
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     17,439
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,181,727
<PP&E>                                       6,839,017
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,703,260
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,560,619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          318,235
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 27,455,144
<COMMON>                                        65,696
<OTHER-SE>                                  54,524,670
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,560,619
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,546,357
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,118,995
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,572,638)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,572,638)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,572,638)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.49)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23025]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel: Occupational Health and Safety Research, Program 
Announcement (PA) 04038

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting:

    Name: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control 
Special Emphasis Panel (SEP): Occupational Health and Safety 
Research, Program Announcement (PA) 04038.
    Times and Dates: 2:30 p.m.-2:45 p.m., November 1, 2004 (open).
    2:45 p.m.-5:30 p.m., November 1, 2004 (closed).
    Place: Office of Extramural Programs, Room 1419, Building 24, 
Executive Park Drive, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone: 888-414-5419 
Pass Code 18205 (this meeting will be held via teleconference).
    Status: Portions of the meeting will be closed to the public in 
accordance with provisions set forth in section 552b(c) (4) and (6), 
Title 5 U.S.C., and the determination of the Director, Management 
Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to 
Program Announcement Number 04038.
    Contact Person for More Information: Pamela J. Wilkerson, 
Designated Federal Official, Office of Extramural Programs, National 
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC, 1600 Clifton 
Road, NE., MS-E74, Atlanta, GA. 30333, Telephone 404-498-2530.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: October 6, 2004.
Alvin Hall,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 04-23025 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
NRC NEWS U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-046 April 10, 2003

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE

TO MEET APRIL 22 - 23 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW)

will hold a meeting on April 22 and 23 in Rockville, Md., that will include a discussion with

representatives from the State of Nevada on issues related to the transportation of spent nuclear

fuel.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in Room T-2B3 and the

Auditorium of the agency’s Two White Flint North Building, at 11545 Rockville Pike. It will

begin at 10:30 a.m. on April 22, and at 8:30 a.m. on April 23.

A complete agenda is available via the Public Meeting Schedule on the NRC’s Web site

at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/public-meetings/meeting-schedule.html#ACNW

For additional information or schedule changes, please contact Howard Larson at 301-415-6805.

###
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1488 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1488

To restore the standards used for determining whether technical workers 
   are not employees as in effect before the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 27, 2003

  Ms. Millender-McDonald (for herself and Mr. Andrews) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To restore the standards used for determining whether technical workers 
   are not employees as in effect before the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Technical Workers Fairness Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF STANDARDS FOR DETERMINING WHETHER TECHNICAL 
              WORKERS ARE NOT EMPLOYEES.

    (a) Repeal of Section 530(d) of the Revenue Act of 1978.--Section 
530(d) of the Revenue Act of 1978 (as added by section 1706 of the Tax 
Reform Act of 1986) is repealed.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to periods ending after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 181
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 181 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93026, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 181.113 Request for basis of adverse marking decision. ( a ) *Request; form and filing.* The exporter or producer of the merchandise which is the subject of an adverse marking decision may request a statement concerning the basis for the decision by filing a typewritten request, in English, with CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically. The request should be on letterhead paper in the form of a letter and clearly designated as a “Request for Basis of Adverse Marking Decision” and shall be signed by the exporter, producer or his authorized agent. The provisions of § 174.3 of this chapter shall apply for purposes of signature by a person other than the principal.
( b ) *Content.* The Request for Basis of Adverse Marking Decision letter shall set forth the following information: ( 1 ) The name and address of the exporter or producer of the merchandise and the name and address of any authorized agent filing the request on behalf of such principal;
( 2 ) A statement that the inquirer is the exporter or producer of the merchandise that was the subject of the adverse marking decision;
( 3 ) In the case of a Canadian exporter or producer, the employer number assigned by Revenue Canada, Customs and Excise; in the case of a Mexican exporter or producer, the Federal taxpayer registry number (RFC); and the Customs identification number of an authorized agent filing the request on behalf of such principal;
( 4 ) The number and date of each entry involved in the request;
( 5 ) A specific description of the merchandise which is the subject of the adverse marking decision; and
( 6 ) A complete statement of all relevant facts relating to the adverse marking decision and the transaction to which it relates, including the date of the decision.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 9, 2018

NO. 03-18-00092-CV

Carlos Zachariah Hernandez-Ocampo, Appellant

v.

Carla Nicole Hernandez-Ocampo, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE 

This is an appeal from the order signed by the district court on February 8, 2018. Having 

reviewed the record, the Court holds that Carlos Zachariah Hernandez-Ocampo has not 

prosecuted his appeal and did not comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, 

the Court dismisses the appeal for want of prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and unable 

to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
#### Ella Baker, Respondent, v. Raphael Nusbaum, Appellant, and Henry B. Irvine, Respondent. (Action No. 1.) Gertrude Besancon, Respondent, v. Raphael Nusbaum, Appellant, and Henry B. Irvine, Respondent. (Action No. 2.) Raphael Nusbaum, Appellant, v. Henry B. Irvine, Respondent, and August F. Schreib, Appellant. (Action No. 3.) Celia Nusbaum, Appellant, v. Henry B. Irvine, Respondent, and August F. Schreib, Appellant. (Action No. 4.) Henry B. Irvine, Respondent, v. Raphael Nusbaum, Appellant. (Action No. 5.) Carrie Irvine, Respondent, v. Raphael Nusbaum, Appellant. (Action No. 6.)

— Order, so far as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur. (The portion of the order appealed from fixes the place of trial and names the plaintiffs in six consolidated actions arising out of an automobile collision.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCum, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-00-49 July 18, 2000

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING NEAR ROBINSON PLANT

ON CHANGES IN REACTOR OVERSIGHT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a public meeting for Wednesday, August 2

to discuss the new reactor oversight process which began at Carolina Power & Light’s Robinson

nuclear power plant, near Hartsville, South Carolina, in April.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. EDT in the Hartsville Town Hall, 133 Carolina Avenue, and

members of the public will have the opportunity to ask questions during the meeting.

The new oversight process uses more objective, timely, and safety-significant criteria in

assessing performance, while seeking to more effectively and efficiently regulate the industry. Under

the new process, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional office-based personnel are

supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance indicators. These

performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant operations, including the viability of

redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection, and security measures.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC's web site every three months. The safety significance of each inspection finding or performance

indicator is characterized by a color -- green, white, yellow, or red.

The NRC response to the inspection findings and performance indicators will be based on the

significance of the items. A green finding receives normal NRC oversight, while white, yellow, or red

assessments receive increasing NRC involvement. Multiple red findings could result in a plant

shutdown.

A plain language summary of the reactor oversight process is available from the NRC Office of

Public Affairs or on the web site at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

###
### §1307. Water rights and replacement

(a) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as affecting in any way the right of any person to enforce or protect, under applicable law, his interest in water resources affected by a surface coal mining operation.

(b) The operator of a surface coal mine shall replace the water supply of an owner of interest in real property who obtains all or part of his supply of water for domestic, agricultural, industrial, or other legitimate use from an underground or surface source where such supply has been affected by contamination, diminution, or interruption proximately resulting from such surface coal mine operation.

(Pub. L. 95–87, title VII, §717, Aug. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 526.)
### §229. Preference right to permits or leases of claimants of lands bona fide entered as agricultural land; terms and conditions

In the case of lands bona fide entered as agricultural, and not withdrawn or classified as mineral at the time of entry, but not including lands claimed under any railroad grant, the entryman or patentee, or assigns, where assignment was made prior to January 1, 1918, if the entry has been patented with the mineral right reserved, shall be entitled to a preference right to a permit and to a lease, as herein provided, in case of discovery; and within an area not greater than a township such entryman and patentees, or assigns holding restricted patents may combine their holdings, not to exceed two thousand five hundred and sixty acres for the purpose of making joint application. Leases executed under this section and embracing only lands so entered shall provide for the payment of a royalty of not less than 121⁄2 per centum as to such areas within the permit as may not be included within the discovery lease to which the permittee is entitled under section 223 of this title.

(Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, §20, 41 Stat. 445.)
January JT201 J^ 1 

S10-110125-0I3 

-; ViRTMENT OF 

HNSPORTATION 

••;;TCPERATICNS 

COI-iTROL NO 

m P 1^53 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re; Continuation of Alaska Airlines' Essential Air Service at Cordova. Gustavus. 

Petersburg. Wranqeil. and Yakutat. Alaska. Docket OST-1998-4899 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

This letter is to express strong support for the selection of Alaska Airlines to continue to 

provide essential air service to our community. 

Alaska's current pattern of service - using jet aircraft - meets crucial needs that would 

be difficult, if not impossible, to meet with any other type of service or aircraft type: 

Alaska's service connects Southeast Alaska passengers to one or more major 

communities of interest, with single-plane service to Anchorage, Juneau, Ketchikan or 

Seattle. From these hubs, our community can access the airline's extensive route 

system and benefit from its marketing relationships with other carriers. The 737-400 

combination ("combi") passenger and cargo aircraft, which Alaska Airlines proposes to 

continue using on this route, provides freight, mail and cargo capacity that a non-jet 

carrier simply cannot provide. Further, the 737-400 combi aircraft is equipped with 

Required Navigation Performance Technology precision technology, which enables the 

airline to reliably access the airport during inclement weather, thus reducing diversions 

and cancellations and, in turn, enabling people and products to dependably reach the 

community. In sum, Alaska's jet service is critical to the economic well being of our 

community. 

For these reasons, we respectfully urge DOT to select Alaska Airlines to continue to 

provide essential air service to Southeast Alaska, as the airline has successfully done 

for more than thirty years. 

Sincerely, / ^ ^ <F^ 

,Uj:£^y^. / ^ ^ f>^J^7^ 

cc: Susan Kurland, Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs 

Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis 

The Honorable Sean Parnell, Governor, State of Alaska 

Marc A. Luiken, Commissioner, Alaska State Department of Transportation and 

Public Facilities
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-118 October 3, 2001

COMMISSIONER DR. NILS J. DIAZ TO BE SWORN IN FOR SECOND TERM

Dr. Nils J. Diaz will be sworn in for a second term as a Commissioner of the Nuclear Regulatory

Commission on October 4 by the Honorable Mel Martinez, U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban

Development, in a ceremony at NRC headquarters in Rockville, Maryland.

By a voice vote on September 26, the Senate confirmed Dr. Diaz to serve a second term as an

NRC Commissioner through June 30, 2006.

Dr. Diaz was first sworn in as a Commissioner in 1996, after a distinguished career spanning a

quarter century as an educator, research scientist, consultant and entrepreneur in such fields as nuclear

engineering, nuclear power sources in space and medical and industrial applications of radioisotopes.

Before joining the NRC, Dr. Diaz was a professor of nuclear engineering at the University of

Florida and Director of the Innovative Nuclear Space Power and Propulsion Institute, a national

consortium of universities and industry. Dr. Diaz received a Bachelor of Science degree in

Mechanical Engineering from the University of Villanova, in Cuba, and both a Master of Science and

Ph. D. degrees from the University of Florida in nuclear engineering sciences.

###