alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 63163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24184]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1561-DR]


Florida; Amendment No. 7 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida (FEMA-1561-DR), dated September 26, 2004, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 20, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 26, 2004:

    Putnam County for Public Assistance (already designated for 
Individual Assistance).
    Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties for Public Assistance 
[Categories C-G] (already designated for Public Assistance 
[Categories A and B], including direct Federal assistance, at 100 
percent Federal funding of the total eligible costs for a period of 
up to 72 hours, and Individual Assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-24184 Filed 10-28-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-04-015 March 22, 2004

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

 

NRC TO MEET WITH SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS

 SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT VOGTLE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Southern Nuclear Operating

Company officials on Thursday, April 1, to discuss the results of NRC’s annual assessment of safety

performance at the Vogtle nuclear power plant near Waynesboro, Georgia, about 30 miles south of

Augusta.

The meeting will be held at 1:00 p.m. at the Vogtle Training Center, 9034 River Road, in

Waynesboro. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be available before

the conclusion of the meeting to answer any questions.

 The performance period to be discussed is January 1 to December 31, 2003. In addition, NRC

staff will provide a brief overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process works.

A letter from the NRC to Southern Nuclear addresses plant safety performance during the

previous year and forms the basis for the meeting discussions. It says that Vogtle has operated safely

and that plant performance was at a level requiring no additional NRC inspection beyond normal. 

The letter, which is available from Region II Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/vog_2003q4.pdf , says the NRC staff will

continue inspections of the plant’s implementation of NRC security advisories and Orders and will

evaluate compliance with new security requirements that may be ordered.

 In addition to routine inspections, the agency will also conduct inspections on the reactor

pressure vessel head, upper and lower head penetration nozzles, reactor containment sump blockage

and spent fuel material control and accounting.

 On October 16 of last year, company officials submitted a request to combine the emergency

operating facilities for plants Vogtle, Hatch and Farley. The NRC has made arrangements for a

demonstration next July 14 of the centralized facility’s capabilities which will include supporting

exercises at Plant Farley and Plant Hatch. NRC officials said the exercises will not be evaluated as

part of the agency’s reactor oversight program but will be evaluated to determine whether or not to

approve the request.

 

 
Current performance indicators for the two units at the Vogtle plant are available at 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/VOG1/vog1_chart.html and

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/VOG2/vog2_chart.html

###
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-79,596-01

EX P ARTE CHRIS L. VASQ UEZ, Applicant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 2008-420,480-A IN THE 140TH DIST RICT COURT

F ROM LUBBOCK COUN TY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1 9 6 7 ). Ap p l icant was convicted of burg lary of a habitation and sentenc ed to forty -five y ear s’ imprisonment. The Seventh Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Vasquez v. State , No. 07-10-00325- CR (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2011, pet. ref’ d). Applicant contends, among other things, that appellate cou n s el rende red ineffe ctive assistance beca

use he failed to challeng e the validity of a resti t u t i o n order on direc t appea l. We
rema nded this application to the trial court for finding s of fac t and conclusions of law. The trial court has deter

mined that appellate counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance
. We find that Applicant2

is entitled to the opportuni t y t o fi l e an out-of-time appea l of the judgme nt of conviction in cause number 2008-420,480 fr o m the 140th District Court of Lubbock County
. Applicant is order ed returne d to that time at which he may g ive a written notice of a ppeal so that he may

then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaning ful appea l. Wit hin ten day s of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall deter

mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wi s h es to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant
on direc t appea l. All time limit s shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc e had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Appli cant de sire to prosec ute an appea l, he mus t take affirma tive steps to file a written not ice of appeal in the t rial court within 30 day s afte r the mandate of this Court issues. Applicant’s rema ining claims are dismiss ed. Ex parte Torres , 943 S.W .2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). Copies of this op in io n shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Octobe r 30, 2013 Do not publish
###### Editorial Note on Part 354

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 354 appear at 63 FR 24403, May 4, 1998, and at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

#### § 354.13 Proceeding without a hearing.

If no party has requested a hearing, the Deputy Under Secretary, within 40 days after the date of service of a charging letter, will submit for inclusion into the record and provide each charged or affected party information supporting the allegations in the charging letter. Each charged or affected party has the right to file a written response to the information and supporting documentation within 30 days after the date of service of the information provided by the Deputy Under Secretary unless the Deputy Under Secretary alters the time period for good cause. The Deputy Under Secretary may allow the parties to submit further information and argument.
§ 1400.302 Reporting to OPM. ( a ) Each agency conducting an investigation under E.O. 10450 is required to notify OPM when the investigation is initiated and when it is completed.
( b ) Agencies must report to OPM an adjudicative determination and action taken with respect to an individual investigated pursuant to E.O. 10450 as soon as possible and in no event later than 90 days after receipt of the final report of investigation.
( c ) To comply with process efficiency requirements, additional data may be collected from agencies conducting investigations or taking action under this part. These collections will be identified in separate OPM and ODNI guidance, issued as necessary under § 1400.103.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending July 3, 2005 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    the information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending July 3, 2005
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Michael M. RajkovicMichael M. RajkovicExecutive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerDated: October 4, 2005
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 15

MULTIMEDIA GAMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
LETTER REGARDING UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:      Multimedia Games, Inc.
         Registration on Form S-3


We are aware that our report dated February 12, 1998 on our review of the
interim financial information of Multimedia Games, Inc. for the period ended
December 31, 1997, and included in this Form 10-QSB is incorporated by
reference in the Company's registration statements on Form S-3 (File Nos.
333-16729, 333-28367, and 333-36319). Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the
Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered a part of the
registration statements prepared or certified by us within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Tulsa, Oklahoma
February 14, 1998
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.3
 GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR
RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
    Award of Shares
 Rights of Stockholder
 Restrictions on Transfer transfer




---



##### 



Lapse of Restrictions
    Transferability
 Adjustment Provisions
 Taxes
 -2-




---



##### 



Registration
 Construction
 Successors
 Entire Agreement; Modification
 Capitalized Terms; Headings; Pronouns; Governing Law
 Notices
 (1) If to the Company:
    
    General Growth Properties, Inc.110 North Wacker DriveChicago, Illinois 60606(2) If to Director:
    
    <Name>c/o General Growth Properties, Inc.110 North Wacker DriveChicago, Illinois 60606
 Severability
 -3-




---



##### 



Counterpart Execution
 
 GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.By:John BucksbaumChief Executive OfficerDIRECTOR<Name>
 -4-
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Joseph C. Greff, Deceased. Lester M. Greff, Appellant; Charles A. Porth et al., Respondents.

Appeal from a decree probating a last will and testament. The testator was about eighty-four years of age and suffering the frailties incident to his advanced years. Two physicians testified that he was rational at the date of the making of the will. There was no definitive testimony to the contrary. The attorney for the appellant-objector asked the Surrogate to disqualify himself because he ate luncheon at the same table with the attorney for the proponent. Objector’s, attorney and his wife sat at an adjoining table. The objection is without merit. *926Decree and order of the Surrogate unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements to the proponent payable from the estate. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Foster and Deyo, JJ. [See *post,*p. 1035.1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT PIERCE DIVISION

CASE NO. 20-14218-CIV-CANNON

TAQUANTE AKEEM JOHNSON,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.,

Respondent.

______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Relief for 

Reduction and/or Modification of Bail [ECF No. 1], filed on June 30, 2020 (“Motion”). The 

Motion was previously referred to Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid for a Report and 

Recommendation (“R&R”) on all dispositive matters [ECF No. 2]. On October 14, 2020, the 

Magistrate Judge issued an R&R recommending that the Motion be denied [ECF No. 6]. The 

R&R states that the Petitioner shall file any objections within fourteen days of the date of service

of a copy of the R&R [ECF No. 6, p. 5]. To date, Petitioner has filed no objections, nor has he

sought additional time in which to do so.

Nevertheless, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the R&R and the record in this 

case and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. See Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1291 

(11th Cir. 2009) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Upon review, the Court finds the R&R to be well 

reasoned and correct. The Court therefore agrees with the analysis in the R&R and concludes that 

the Motion must be DENIED for the reasons set forth therein.

Case 2:20-cv-14218-AMC Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2021 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 20-14218-CIV-CANNON

2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The R&R [ECF No. 6] is ADOPTED; 

2. The Motion [ECF No. 1] is DENIED;

3. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE;

4. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT; and

5. The Clerk shall CLOSE this case.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Pierce, Florida this 18th day of March 2021.

 _________________________________

 AILEEN M. CANNON

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Taquante Akeem Johnson

0321097

Martin County Jail

Inmate Mail/Parcels

800 SE Monterey Road

Stuart, FL 34994

PRO SE

Case 2:20-cv-14218-AMC Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2021 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Diasense, Inc.
File No. 33-56574

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 -
                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Diasense,  Inc.  (Company) on Form
10-QSB for the period ended  December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (Report),  I, Glenn A.  Little,  Chief
Executive and Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,  adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Dated: January 16, 2007                     By: /s/ Glenn A. Little
       ----------------                        ---------------------------------
                                                                 Glenn A. Little
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Diasense,  Inc. and will be retained by Diasense, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 13.2



LOGO



A CENTURY OF
LOCAL BANKS SERVING LOCAL COMMUNITIES.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Year Ended December 31

2009 2008 2007 2006 2005

Income Statement Data:

Interest income $ 56,727 $ 59,386 $ 58,201 $ 51,016 $ 43,229

Interest expense 24,050 26,809 24,962 19,444 13,198

Net interest income 32,677 32,577 33,239 31,572 30,031

Provision for loan losses 4,200 4,025 1,238 725 552

Net interest income after

provision for loan losses 28,477 28,552 32,001 30,847 29,479

Noninterest income (charge) (12,555) 2,926 6,096 5,129 4,503

Securities gains (losses) 66
44 14 36 224

Noninterest expense 30,648 27,945 25,874 25,819 24,893

Income (loss) before income taxes (14,660) 3,577 12,237 10,193 9,313

Income taxes (benefit) (5,856) 506 3,483 2,956 2,587

Net income (loss) (8,804) 3,071 8,754 7,237 6,726

Effective dividend on preferred stock 1,459  -

Net income (loss) available to common

shareholders $ (10,263) $ 3,071 $ 8,754 $ 7,237 $ 6,726

Per Share Data:

Diluted earnings (loss) per share $ (1.73) $ 0.52 $ 1.45 $ 1.45 $ 1.37

Cash dividends 0.31 0.64 0.64 0.63 0.60

Book value at period end 13.67 13.23 15.30 14.43 12.61

Balance Sheet Data:

Assets $ 1,126,283 $ 1,051,363 $ 926,711 $ i 851,398 $ 763,926

Loans, net of unearned income 853,063 819,266 708,817 650,492 574,085

Securities 178,383
161,879 160,865 127,167 135,420

Deposits 852,862 813,533 671,900 653,979 628,343

Total capital 105,198 78,029 90,769 87,807 61,874

Shareholders equitycommon 81,198 78,029 90,769 87,807 61,874

Average shares outstanding, basic 5,920 5,889 6,035 4,985 4,893

Average shares outstanding, diluted 5,920 5,890 6,040 4,992 4,902

Performance Ratios:

Return on average assets -0.93% 0.31% 0.99% 0.91% 0.93%

Return on average common equity -13.16% 3.55% 9.75% 11.10% 11.05%

Dividend payout(1) n/a
123.02% 44.19% 42.81% 43.63%

Efficiency(2) 76.84% 70.15% 64.75% 69.18% 70.36%

Average equity to average assets 9.23% 8.69% 10.14% 10.61% 8.38%

Asset Quality Ratios:

Allowance for loan losses to

period end loans
1.42% 1.29% 1.11% 1.08% 1.15%

Allowance for loan losses to

nonaccrual loans 62.91% 77.66% 544.47% 503.52% 746.72%

Nonperforming assets to period

end loans and other real estate 3.88% 2.04% 0.40% 0.45% 0.44%

Net charge-offs to average loans 0.31% 0.24% 0.06% 0.04% 0.12%

Capital and Liquidity Ratios:

Leverage 9.08% 8.62% 10.80% 11.57% 8.87%

Risk-based capital ratios:

Tier 1 capital 11.60% 10.51% 13.82% 15.04% 12.04%

Total capital 12.29% 11.56% 14.75% 16.15% 13.23%

Average loans to average deposits(3) 84.67%
86.15% 87.20% 84.67% 79.59%

Note (1) Dividend payout is not a meaningful measure in a year in which a
loss is reported.

Efficiency ratio is computed by dividing non-interest expense by the sum of net-interest
income on a tax equivalent basis and non-interest income, net of securities gains or losses.

Average deposits
in the average loans to average deposits calculation includes long-term debt. Average loans are before any adjustment for nonaccrual loans.

Eastern Virginia Bankshares A Century of Community Banking 2009 Annual Report
### §6630. Disposal of used or surplus furniture and equipment by Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of Senate; procedure; deposit of receipts

Effective October 1, 1981, the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate is authorized to dispose of used or surplus furniture and equipment by trade-in or by sale directly or through the General Services Administration. Receipts from the sale of such furniture and equipment shall be deposited in the United States Treasury for credit to the appropriation for "Miscellaneous Items" under the heading "Contingent Expenses of the Senate".

(Pub. L. 95–94, title I, §103, Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 660; Pub. L. 97–51, §118, Oct. 1, 1981, 95 Stat. 964.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 59c and then to section 117b of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Congressional Operations Appropriation Act, 1978, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriation Act, 1978.

#### Amendments

1981—Pub. L. 97–51 substituted "Effective October 1, 1981" for "Effective October 1, 1977" and struck out provisions requiring that all receipts from the sale of furniture and equipment, other than such furniture and equipment as was replaced in kind, be deposited in the United States Treasury as miscellaneous receipts.
#### William Ziener, Respondent, v. George W. Linch, as Receiver of the Second Avenue Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless the respondent stipulates to reduce the verdict to $3,500; in which event the judgment as so reduced and the order appealed from will be affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-026 February 18, 2000

NOTE TO EDITORS: NRC PLANS FOR LEAP DAY TRANSITION

The NRC will have a small response team in its headquarters Operations Center

February 28 to March 1 to monitor any computer problems related to leap year transition and to support

the Information Coordination Center established by the President’s Council on Year 2000 Conversion.

Public Affairs staff will be available to assist the news media during normal working hours at its

headquarters offices in Rockville, Maryland, and in its four regions.

One of the Year 2000 (Y2K) computer-related problems that could occur at the end of February

28, is date-discontinuity-- that is, the date as expressed by a computer system does not successfully

advance during the transition from one day to the next. Some computer systems and software

applications may be incorrectly programmed with respect to leap year considerations and could

potentially fail during the transition.

Owners of nuclear power plants and fuel cycle facilities’ have completed leap year testing as

part of their Y2K readiness. Based on our regulatory oversight, independent inspections, and

information from licensees, the NRC has not identified any Y2K problem that may adversely affect

operating nuclear facilities to continue safe operation during the upcoming Y2K leap-day transition.

In addition to headquarters staffing, NRC resident inspectors will continue to be on site at all

nuclear power plants during normal work hours. Staff also will be available in our four regions in King

of Prussia, Pennsylvania; Atlanta, Georgia; Lisle, Illinois; and Arlington, Texas. More detailed plans

are available at http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/Y2K/Y2kleapday2.pdf on NRC’s Y2K web site.

###