alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued December 11, 2014 .

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 14
- 00662
- CR

——————————— JAMES JACKSON, III , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1359104

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, James Jackson, III has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal, which he and his attorney ha ve signed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.2(a). We have not issued a decision in the appeal , and more than 10 days have passed and t he State has not2

responded or otherwise expressed opposition to the motion. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 10.3(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley , and Massengale. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b).
### United States Department of State

Bureau of Oceans and International

Env ironmental and Scientific Affairs

Washington, D.C. 20520

January 24 , 2013

Mr. Marco Gonzalez

Executive Secretary

Ozone Secretariat

United Nations Environment Programme

United Nations Avenue

P.O. Box 30552

Nairobi, Kenya

Dear Mr. Gonzalez:

Consistent with provisions of the Montreal Protocol and of Decision IX/6 of the Parties, the United States

submits the enclosed nomination for a methyl bromide critical use exemption (CUE) in 201 5 . This nomination is

intended for consideration by the Parties to the Protocol at their Twenty Fifth meeting in 2013

. The enclosed document

includes separate chap ters that describe each of the three sectors for which the United States is making a nomination:

California strawberries, dates , and dry cured pork products. We hope that this organization provides the informat ion in

the most accessible manner to facilitate the efforts of the Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee (MBTOC)

during their review.

We also wish to ensure MBTOC is aware that tolerances related to sulfuryl fluoride are under consideration in

the U nited States, and we are keeping that under close review as that process moves forward. Consistent with past

practice, the U.S. critical use nomination is based on available alternatives that are viable at the time of the nomination.

We would revisit th e U.S. Government’s decision not to nominate certain sectors should the registration status of

sulfuryl fluoride in the United States change significantly

.

We appreciate your consideration of this application, and look forward to working with you and oth ers to

answer any questions that may arise during the review process. Best regards.

Sincerely,

John Thompson

Deputy Director

Office of Environmental Policy
#### § 206.68 Public report.

Upon making a report to the President of the results of an investigation under section 422(b) or a review under section 422(j) of the Trade Act, the Commission will make such report public (with the exception of information which the Commission determines to be confidential) and cause a summary thereof to be published in the Federal Register.
#### In the Matter of Albert J. Marino, Respondent, against William A. Clark et al., Appellants, and Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondent.

Order reversed on the law, without costs, and the petitions held valid. It being conceded that there was no fraud and that the signatures were affixed upon the dates stated in the designating petitions, we find the petitions valid. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Alternative Project Sites

LAKEVILLE

SITE

WILFRED

SITE

STONY POINT SITE

WILFRED SITE

SONOMA

COUNTY

LEGEND

NORTH

0 1.5mi 3mi

Wilfred Site

Stony Point Site

Lakeville Site

City of Rohnert Park

City of Cotati
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-53903 and 333-37724) of Spectra-Physics Lasers,
Inc. of our report dated January 22, 1999 relating to the financial statements,
which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated January 22, 1999 relating to the
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, CA
March 16, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statement of Getty Communications plc and subsidiaries
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such consolidated
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           29234
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    23431
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2800
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 60504
<PP&E>                                           63702
<DEPRECIATION>                                   23849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  171638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            37442
<BONDS>                                          16342
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           608
<OTHER-SE>                                      118931
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    171638
<SALES>                                         100797
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                100797
<CGS>                                            37514
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    37514
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 55403
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   536
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   7895
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3873
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4022
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4022
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10


</TABLE>
### §61d. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 61d was editorially reclassified as section 6651 of this title. Section 6651 of this title was subsequently repealed by Pub. L. 116–94, div. E, title II, §212(a)(3)(G), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2776.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 61d, Pub. L. 93–145, Nov. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 528; Pub. L. 95–26, title I, May 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 80; Pub. L. 96–38, title I, §103, July 25, 1979, 93 Stat. 112; Pub. L. 97–51, §121, Oct. 1, 1981, 95 Stat. 965, provided that effective October 1, 1981, the compensation of Chaplain of Senate would be $52,750.

Another prior section 61d, acts Aug. 5, 1955, ch. 568, §1, 69 Stat. 499; July 12, 1960, Pub. L. 86–628, 74 Stat. 446; Aug. 14, 1964, Pub. L. 88–426, title II, §203(h), 78 Stat. 415; Dec. 12, 1969, Pub. L. 91–145, 83 Stat. 340; Aug. 18, 1970, Pub. L. 91–382, 84 Stat. 808, made provision for the appointment of a Secretary to Chaplain of Senate and prescribed compensation of Chaplain of Senate and Secretary to Chaplain.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-01-010 March 13, 2001

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH PUBLIC

TO DISCUSS STORAGE OF SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL AT DIABLO CANYON

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with the public on Tuesday, March 20, to

discuss the licensing and regulatory program that will govern plans to construct and operate a dry cask

storage facility for spent nuclear fuel at the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant near Avila Beach,

Calif.

The meeting will be at the San Luis Obispo Public Library, 995 Palm Street, from 6 - 10 p.m.

The evening will begin with an “open house” at 6 p.m. at which the public can meet with NRC

officials informally. At 7 p.m. the NRC will make a brief presentation. The agency also has invited

representatives from Pacific Gas & Electric Co. to provide an overview of the planned facility, and the

San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning and Building to discuss its environmental review

process. These presentations will be followed by a public question and comment period.

NRC officials will be available for press interviews from 6 - 7 p.m., or after the meeting, which

is expected to conclude no later than 10 p.m.

Spent nuclear fuel is the waste left when the fissionable uranium atoms in nuclear fuel have

split to generate the intense heat that makes nuclear reactors possible. The waste is in the form of

small ceramic pellets stacked inside long, cylindrical metal tubes called fuel rods. The rods are

assembled in bundles containing as many as 256 rods each.

Spent fuel at Diablo Canyon is currently stored under water in spent fuel pools. However,

spent fuel pool storage capacity is limited, and plant managers are seeking permission to move some of

the spent fuel into an independent, dry storage facility consisting of large steel and concrete containers.

Dry cask storage is intended to be a temporary storage solution pending construction of a permanent

repository, which is the responsibility of the Department of Energy. DOE is investigating the

suitability of a site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, for construction of the permanent repository.

###
### §1295. Grants to States

#### (a) Assisting any State in development, administration, and enforcement of State programs under this chapter

The Secretary is authorized to make annual grants to any State for the purpose of assisting such State in developing, administering, and enforcing State programs under this chapter. Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section, such grants shall not exceed 80 per centum of the total costs incurred during the first year, 60 per centum of total costs incurred during the second year, and 50 per centum of the total costs incurred during each year thereafter.

#### (b) Assisting any State in development, administration, and enforcement of its State programs

The Secretary is authorized to cooperate with and provide assistance to any State for the purpose of assisting it in the development, administration, and enforcement of its State programs. Such cooperation and assistance shall include—

(1) technical assistance and training including provision of necessary curricular and instruction materials, in the development, administration, and enforcement of the State programs; and

(2) assistance in preparing and maintaining a continuing inventory of information on surface coal mining and reclamation operations for each State for the purposes of evaluating the effectiveness of the State programs. Such assistance shall include all Federal departments and agencies making available data relevant to surface coal mining and reclamation operations and to the development, administration, and enforcement of State programs concerning such operations.

#### (c) Increases in annual grants

If, in accordance with section 1273(d) of this title, a State elects to regulate surface coal mining and reclamation operations on Federal lands, the Secretary may increase the amount of the annual grants under subsection (a) of this section by an amount which he determines is approximately equal to the amount the Federal Government would have expended for such regulation if the State had not made such election.

(Pub. L. 95–87, title VII, §705, Aug. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 520.)
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1533 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                       October 1, 2004.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
1533) entitled ``An Act to amend the securities laws to permit church 
pension plans to be invested in collective trusts.'', do pass with the 
following

                               AMENDMENT:

    Page 2, strike lines 17 through 22 and insert:
            (2) by striking ``other than any plan described in clause 
        (A), (B), or (C)'' and inserting the following: ``or (D) a 
        church plan, company, or account that is excluded from the 
        definition of an investment company under section 3(c)(14) of 
        the Investment Company Act of 1940, other than any plan 
        described in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D)''.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1533

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

                   CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
                         OF NATIONAL HEALTH REALTY, INC.
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005

      The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigned's best knowledge and
belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for National Health Realty, Inc.
("Issuer") for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      This Certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Issuer for the annual period ended December 31, 2005.

      This Certification is executed as of March 6, 2006.

                                  /s/ Robert G. Adams
                                  --------------------------------
                                  Robert G. Adams
                                  President

                                  /s/ Donald K. Daniel
                                  --------------------------------
                                  Donald K. Daniel
                                  Principal Accounting Officer
                                  (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to National Health Realty, Inc. and will be retained by National Health
Realty, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
### §1759. Fees and charges

In fiscal year 2009 and each fiscal year thereafter, fees and charges authorized by section 9701 of title 31 may be collected only to the extent provided in advance in appropriations Acts.

(Pub. L. 111–8, div. E, title I, Mar. 11, 2009, 123 Stat. 711.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2009, and also as part of the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009, and not as part of the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act of 1982 which comprises this chapter. Section is based on a proviso in the par. under the headings "Minerals Management Service" and "royalty and offshore minerals management" in title I of div. E of Pub. L. 111–8.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-60124 Summary Calendar

ELLA ARMSTRONG,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:97-CV-57-B

- - - - - - - - - -

April 30, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ella Armstrong appeals the district court’s judgment for the

Commissioner in his action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for

review of the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) decision denying

her request for Disability Insurance Bene fits and Supplemental

Security Income . We review the Commissioner’s decision to

determine whether the decision is supported by substantial evidenceNo. 98-60124 -2-

in the record and whether the Commissioner applied the proper legal

standards in evaluating the evidence. V illa v. Sullivan

, 895 F.2d

1019, 1021 (5th Cir. 1990).

Armstrong makes the following contentions: (1) the

Commissioner did not adequately consider “the severity and effects”

of her physical impairments on her residual f unctional capacity;

(2) the Commissioner did not properly evaluate her mental

impairments; (3) the ALJ failed to fulfill his duty by not ordering

a consultative neurological examination; and 4) the case should be

remanded because the transcript of the hearing before the ALJ

contains “repeated references to the inaudibility of [Armstrong’s]

testimony.” We have reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs,

and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the

judgment entered by the district court. S ee Armstrong v. Apfel

,

No. 3:97CV57-B-B (N.D. Miss. Jan. 12, 1998).

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23513]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--American Society of Safety Engineers

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 15, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), American Society of Safety 
Engineers (``ASSE'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
(1) the name and principal place of business of the standards 
development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards 
development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: American 
Society of Safety Engineers, Des Plaines, IL. The nature and scope of 
ASSE's standards development activities are: To advance the technical, 
scientific, managerial and ethical knowledge and skills of occupational 
safety, health and environmental professionals.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23513 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

C.E.H., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-3527

[August 3, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; James L. Martz, Judge; L.T. Case No. 16CJ001148AMB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin Eisenberg, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. 

Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, DAMOORGIAN, and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### §285. Laws applicable

The general provisions of sections 182 to 184, 185 to 188, 189 to 192, 193, and 194 1 of this title, are made applicable to permits and leases under this subchapter.

(Feb. 7, 1927, ch. 66, §5, 44 Stat. 1058; Aug. 8, 1946, ch. 916, §11, 60 Stat. 957.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 194 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 644.

#### Codification

Provision of this section that section 193 of this title was amended to include deposits of potassium was omitted from this section as executed to section 193 of this title.

Section was not enacted as part of act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

1946—Act Aug. 8, 1946, struck out reference to section 181 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

See note set out under section 181 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-130-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)