alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 03-146 November 14, 2003

 NRC REVISES RULES GOVERNING CONDUCT OF HEARINGS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is revising its regulations governing the conduct of

hearings to make them more effective, efficient and understandable to the public.

The revisions retain formal trial-type proceedings for enforcement actions, the construction and

operation of uranium enrichment facilities, the initial authorization hearings on whether to construct a

potential high-level waste repository, and the initial authorization hearings on whether to receive and

possess high-level waste at a repository. Either informal or formal proceedings could be used in all

other proceedings, including applications to build new power plants, depending on specific issues in

those proceedings. Formal proceedings may also be used to resolve specific issues involving disputes

over the credibility of an eyewitness, or issues of motive or intent of an eyewitness or party.

Revisions to NRC’s rules of practice for domestic licensing proceedings and issuance of orders

(Part 2 to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations) include a new Subpart C. It consolidates in one

subpart the general hearing procedures that would apply to all NRC adjudications, including those

procedures that would govern rulings on requests for hearings or petitions to intervene and admission

of contentions in every case. In addition, the new Subpart C establishes criteria for determining the

specific hearing process/procedure or track to be used in particular cases, and provides for document

disclosure in all proceedings.

Other portions of the final rule contain a revised Subpart G for more formal trial-type

proceedings, a substantially revised Subpart L to provide less formal hearing procedures to cover most

NRC adjudicatory proceedings and a new Subpart N that provides “fast track” proceedings to be used

in simple cases when the oral hearing can be completed within two days. The final rule also requires

most proceedings to be conducted by an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, or an administrative law

judge.

A proposed rule on this subject was published in the Federal Register in April of 2001. The

NRC received more than 1,430 public comments from individuals, public interest groups and the

industry. Commission consideration of the comments has led to changes in the final rule.

The final rule will become effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. 

###
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin E. Franklin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Martin E. Franklin 
|Martin E. Franklin     
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 9, 2005       



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Jarden Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ian G.H. Ashken, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Ian G.H. Ashken    
|Ian G.H. Ashken        
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 9, 2005
#### Coburn T. NORFLEET, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-1152.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 25, 2002.

Decided May 6, 2002.

*60Coburn T. Norfleet, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Phillip Cihlar, Carol Ann Barthel, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Coburn T. Norfleet appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition to quash administrative summonses issued to third parties by the Internal Revenue Service. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Norfleet v. United States,*No. MISC-01-28-5 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 240 (Friday, December 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 64364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27132]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Usona 
Institute

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and 
applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the 
issuance of the proposed registration on or before February 12, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his 
authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority 
to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation 
and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of 
manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of 
controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with 
suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated 
to the Assistant Administrator of the DEA Diversion Control Division 
(``Assistant Administrator'') pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, 
appendix to subpart R.
    In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on 
October 31, 2018, Usona Institute, 2800 Woods Hollow Road, Madison, 
Wisconsin 53711 applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the 
following basic classes of controlled substances:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Controlled substance               Drug code       Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5-Methoxy-N-N-dimethyltryptamine.........            7431  I
Dimethyltryptamine.......................            7435  I
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The institute plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
synthetically in bulk for use in institute-sponsored research.

    Dated: December 4, 2018.
John J. Martin,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-27132 Filed 12-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
### SUBCHAPTER III—GENERAL BRIDGE AUTHORITY
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-149 December 31, 2002

NRC ADDS NUHOMS-24PT1

STORAGE CASK DESIGN TO APPROVED LIST

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is amending its regulations to add the Standardized

Advanced NUHOMS-24PT1 cask system to the list of approved cask designs that licensees can use to

store spent fuel at their nuclear power plants under a general license without site-specific approval. 

Under the terms of an NRC general license, any nuclear power reactor operator can use a preapproved cask, if the company notifies the NRC in advance, meets the conditions of the cask’s NRC

certificate of compliance, and complies with NRC’s regulations. These regulations include a

requirement to ensure that the reactor site characteristics are within the scope of the cask’s safety

analysis report and that potential site-boundary radiation doses are within Federal safety limits. 

The NUHOMS 24PT1 cask design provides improved shielding and the ability to withstand

larger earthquakes than the previously approved standardized NUHOMS cask system; otherwise, the

cask designs are the same. 

The NRC is simultaneously issuing a final safety evaluation report and a certificate of

compliance, which will be effective 30 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register,

expected shortly. The cask’s certificate of compliance will expire 20 years later, unless the certificate is

renewed. 

Single copies of the safety evaluation report and certificate of compliance are available for

public inspection and copying for a fee at the NRC Public Document Room, located at 11555 Rockville

Pike, Rockville, Maryland, telephone 301-415-4737 or 1-800-397-4209. 

###
### §66. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–344, title V, §505(1), July 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 322

Section, act June 19, 1934, ch. 648, title I, §1, 48 Stat. 1022, directed that the fiscal year for adjustment of accounts of Secretary of Senate for compensation and mileage of Senators extend from July 1 to June 30.
### §3812. Prohibition against delegation

Any function, duty, or responsibility which this chapter specifies be carried out by the Attorney General or an Assistant Attorney General designated by the Attorney General, shall not be delegated to, or carried out by, any other officer or employee of the Department of Justice.

(Added Pub. L. 99–509, title VI, §6103(a), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1948.)
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A . Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 18, 2009

p1215 

# Order

December 18, 2009

140106

In re LEAH MARIE KRESUK and RACHEL ANNE KRES UCK, Minors.

_____________ _______________ _____________ DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 140106 COA: 292504 Oakland Cir Ct Fam Div: 09-756736-NA LEO KRESUK, JR., Respondent-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 10, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
§ 1632.7 Meetings closed to public observation. ( a ) A meeting or a portion of a meeting will be closed to public observation, or information as to such meeting or portion of a meeting will be withheld, only by recorded vote of a majority of the Members of the Board when it is determined that the meeting or the portion of the meeting or the withholding of information qualifies for exemption under § 1632.5. Votes by proxy are not allowed.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, a separate vote of the Members of the Board will be taken with respect to the closing or the withholding of information as to each meeting or portion thereof which is proposed to be closed to public observation or with respect to which information is proposed to be withheld pursuant to this section.
( c ) A single vote may be taken with respect to a series of meetings, a portion or portions of which are proposed to be closed to public observation or with respect to any information concerning such series of meetings proposed to be withheld, so long as each meeting or portion thereof in such series involves the same particular matters and is scheduled to be held no more than thirty days after the initial meeting in such series.
( d ) Whenever any person's interests may be directly affected by a portion of the meeting for any of the reasons referred to in exemption (a)(5), (a)(6) or (a)(7) of § 1632.5 of this part, such person may request in writing to the Secretary of the Board that such portion of the meeting be closed to public observation. The Secretary, or in his or her absence, the Acting Secretary of the Board, shall transmit the request to the members and upon the request of any one of them a recorded vote shall be taken whether to close such meeting to public observation.
( e ) Within one day of any vote taken pursuant to paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section, the agency will make publicly available at the Board's External Affairs Office a written copy of such vote reflecting the vote of each member on the question. If a meeting or a portion of a meeting is to be closed to public observation, the Board, within one day of the vote taken pursuant to paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section, will make publicly available at the Board's External Affairs Office a full written explanation of its action closing the meeting or portion of the meeting together with a list of all persons expected to attend the meeting and their affiliation, except to the extent such information is determined by the Board to be exempt from disclosure under subsection (c) of the Act and § 1632.5 of this part.
( f ) Any person may request in writing to the Secretary of the Board that an announced closed meeting, or portion of the meeting, be held open to public observation. The Secretary, or in his or her absence, the Acting Secretary of the Board, will transmit the request to the members of the Board and upon the request of any member a recorded vote will be taken whether to open such meeting to public observation.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 08

- 00403

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellant

v.

DONNA MURRAY

, Appellee

From the 13th District Court

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. 31652

- CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The State has filed a motion to dismi ss its appeal. A decision of this C ourt has

not been issued ; therefore , we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

.

P. 42.2(a); see also T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.2(f); State v. De Guislain

, No. 02

- 07

- 00353

- CR , 2008

Tex. App. LEXIS 1689 (Tex. A pp.

— Fort Worth Feb. 28, 2008, no pet. ) (not designated for

publication).State v. Murray Page 2 FELIPE REYNA

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna , and

Justice Davis

Appeal Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed October 14, 2009

Do not publish

[CR25]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23935]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-04-028]


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: International Trade Commission.

Time and Date: October 28, 2004 at 1 p.m.

Place:  Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status:  Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Agenda for future meetings: none
    2. Minutes
    3. Ratification List
    4. Inv. No. 731-TA-244 (Second Review) (Natural Bristle 
Paintbrushes from China)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is 
currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' 
opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before November 9, 2004.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: none
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: October 20, 2004.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-23935 Filed 10-21-04; 12:02 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
### §541g. Rules and regulations

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to issue such rules and regulations as may be necessary or appropriate to effectuate the purposes of this chapter.

(Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 795, §8, 69 Stat. 681.)
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-033 April 10, 2002 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC TO MEET WITH COMPANY TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE

OF VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Vermont Yankee

Nuclear Power Corporation (VYNPC) on Tuesday, April 16, to discuss the results of the agency’s

annual assessment of safety performance at the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant. The facility is

located in Vernon, Vt., and operated by VYNPC.

The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 1 p.m.

at the Governor Hunt House, 320 Governor Hunt Road in Vernon. Before the session is adjourned,

NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the public on the safety performance of the

Vermont Yankee plant, as well as the role of the NRC in ensuring safe plant operation.

The performance period to be discussed is April 1, 2001, to December 31, 2001. In addition,

NRC staff will provide an overview of the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process.

A letter sent from the NRC Region I office to VYNPC addresses the performance of the plant

during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the NRC

web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/vy_2001q4.pdf

Current performance information for Vermont Yankee is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/VY/vy_chart.html

###
Exhibit32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

                In connection with the Quarterly Report of GlobalIndustries, Ltd. ("Global") on Form10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2006as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on May 10, 2006(the "Report"), theundersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 1350 asadopted pursuant to §§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledgebased upon a review of the Report, that:

(1)            The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2)            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global as of thedates and for periods presented as required by such Report.

 

| /S/ WILLIAM J. DORE'    |
|-------------------------|
| William J. Doré    |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| May 10,  2006           |

 

This certification is provided pursuant to §§ 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Global or the certifying officerfor purposes of §§ 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by§§ 906 has been provided to Global and will be retained by it and furnished tothe SEC or its staff upon request.
### §61j–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 61j–2 was editorially reclassified as section 6134 of this title.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Randall Sierra, * From the 358th District

 Court of Ector County,

 Trial Court No. D-42,995.

Vs. No. 11-15-00064-CR * August 31, 2015

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
### §1756. Expanded royalty obligations

Any lessee is liable for royalty payments on oil or gas lost or wasted from a lease site when such loss or waste is due to negligence on the part of the operator of the lease, or due to the failure to comply with any rule or regulation, order or citation issued under this chapter or any mineral leasing law.

(Pub. L. 97–451, title III, §308, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2462.)