59554 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 189 / Friday, September 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

environment. This rule involves the 

establishment of three safety zones. This 

rule is categorically excluded from 

further review under, paragraph 34(g) of 

figure 2–1 of the Commandant 

Instruction. An environmental analysis 

checklist and a categorical exclusion 

determination are available in the 

docket where indicated under 

ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or 

information that may lead to the 

discovery of a significant environmental 

impact from this rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Marine safety, Navigation (water), 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Revise § 165.T01–0767 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T01–0767 Safety Zone; Boston 

Harbor’s Rock Removal Project, Boston 

Inner Harbor, Boston, MA. 

(a) General. Three temporary safety 

zones are established for the Boston 

Harbor’s Rock Removal Project as 

follows: 

(1) Location. (i) All navigable waters 

from surface to bottom, within a 100- 

yard radius around the vessel or vessels 

conducting drilling, blasting, dredging, 

and other related operations related to 

rock removal in Boston’s Inner Harbor 

near Castle Island. 

(ii) All navigable waters from surface 

to bottom, with a 100-yard radius 

around the vessel ‘‘MANTIS’’ while 

transporting explosives to and from the 

work site. 

(iii) All navigable waters from surface 

to bottom, with a 500-yard radius 

around the blasting site while setting up 

for blasting, blasting, and in the 

immediate aftermath. 

(2) Definitions. For the purposes of 

this section, ‘‘Designated on-scene 

representative’’ is any Coast Guard 

commissioned, warrant, or petty officer 

who has been designated by the Captain 

of the Port Boston (COTP) to act on the 

COTP’s behalf. The designated 

representative may be on an Official 

Patrol Vessel. An ‘‘Official Patrol 

Vessel’’ may consist of any Coast Guard, 

Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or local 

law enforcement vessels assigned or 

approved by the COTP or the designated 

on-scene representative may be on shore 

and will communicate with vessels via 

VHF–FM radio or loudhailer. In 

addition, members of the Coast Guard 

Auxiliary may be present to inform 

vessel operators of this regulation. 

(3) Enforcement Period. This rule will 

be enforced daily from 5 a.m. to 8 p.m. 

from September 4, 2012, until 

September 30, 2012. 

(b) Regulations. (1) The general 

regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23, 

as well as the following regulations, 

apply. 

(2) No vessels, except for participating 

or public vessels, will be allowed to 

enter into, transit through, or anchor 

within these safety zones without the 

permission of the COTP or the 

designated on-scene representative. 

(3) All persons and vessels shall 

comply with the instructions of the 

COTP or the designated on-scene 

representative. Upon being hailed by a 

U.S. Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio, 

flashing light, or other means, the 

operator of a vessel shall proceed as 

directed. 

(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter 

or operate within the regulated area 

shall contact the COTP or the 

designated on-scene representative via 

VHF channel 16 or 617–223–3201 

(Sector Boston command Center) to 

obtain permission. 

Dated: September 4, 2012. 

J.C. O’Connor III, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Boston. 

[FR Doc. 2012–23855 Filed 9–27–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2012–0448; FRL–9732–2] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Georgia; 

Control Techniques Guidelines and 

Reasonably Available Control 

Technology 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is approving four final 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

revisions submitted by the State of 

Georgia, through the Georgia 

Environmental Protection Division (GA 

EPD), to EPA on November 13, 1992, 

October 21, 2009 (three separate 

submittals on this day), and March 19, 

2012. Additionally, EPA is approving a 

SIP revision that GA EPD submitted on 

July 19, 2012, for parallel processing. 

GA EPD submitted the final submission 

related to the July 19, 2012, draft SIP 

revision on September 7, 2012. 

Together, these revisions establish 

reasonably available control technology 

(RACT) requirements for the major 

sources located in the Atlanta, Georgia 

1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment area 

(hereafter referred to as the ‘‘Atlanta 

Area’’) that either emit volatile organic 

compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides 

(NOX), or both. Georgia’s SIP revisions 

include certain VOC source categories 

for which EPA has issued Control 

Techniques Guidelines (CTG). EPA has 

evaluated the revisions to Georgia’s SIP, 

and has made the determination that 

they are consistent with the Clean Air 

Act (CAA or Act), statutory and 

regulatory requirements and EPA 

guidance. 

DATES: Effective Date: This rule will be 

effective October 29, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket 

Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR– 

2012–0448. All documents in the docket 

are listed on the www.regulations.gov 

Web site. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., Confidential Business 

Information or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Regulatory Development Section, 

Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30 

excluding federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane 

Spann, Regulatory Development 

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, 

Pesticides and Toxics Management 

Division, Region 4, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 61 Forsyth Street 

SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The 

telephone number is (404) 562–9029. 

Ms. Spann can also be reached via 

electronic mail at spann.jane@epa.gov. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 189 / Friday, September 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 59555 

1Effective July 20, 2012, EPA designated 15 

counties in the Atlanta metropolitan area as a 

marginal nonattainment area for the 2008 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS. Today’s final action regarding 

RACT is not related to requirements for the 2008 

8-hour ozone NAAQS. 

2Three separate submittals were submitted to 

EPA from GA EPD on October 21, 2009. These are 

Submittals A, B and C referenced in the July 31, 

2012, proposed approval. See 77 FR 45307. 

3 Georgia submitted a SIP revision on September 

15, 2008, that addressed four RACT rule changes 

that are described in EPA’s July 31, 2012, proposed 

rulemaking. Specifically, these rules are Rules 391– 

1–.02(2)(y) Metal Furniture, (ff) Solvent Metal 

Cleaning, (ii) Miscellaneous Metal Coating and 

(kkk) Aerospace Coatings. EPA notes that Georgia 

submitted a subsequent SIP revision to make 

additional changes to these aforementioned rules. 

While EPA’s July 31, 2012, proposed rulemaking 

does not specifically reference Georgia’s September 

15, 2008, SIP revisions, EPA’s proposal does 

account for the comprehensive changes to Rules 

391–1–.02(2)(y), (ii) and (kkk) from Georgia’s 

September 15, 2008, SIP revision as supplemented 

with subsequent SIP revisions and EPA’s proposal 

does account for appropriate applicability for Rule 

391–1–.02(2)(ff). The version of the Rule 391–1– 

.02(2)(ff) already in the federally approved SIP, 

along with the applicability change found in EPA’s 

proposal, meet the RACT requirements. Georgia’s 

September 15, 2008, SIP revision also included 

revisions to seven additional rules which were not 

addressed in EPA’s July 31, 2012, proposed 

rulemaking and are not being finalized in today’s 

action. These seven additional rules are unrelated 

to RACT. 

4On July 31, 2012, EPA proposed approval of GA 

EPD’s July 19, 2012, SIP revision contingent upon 

Georgia providing EPA a final SIP revision that was 

not changed significantly from the July 19, 2012, 

SIP revision. Georgia provided its final SIP revision 

on September 7, 2012. There were no changes made 

to the final submittal. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Background 

II. This Action 

III. Final Action 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Background 

On April 30, 2004, EPA designated 

the Atlanta Area as a marginal 

nonattainment area with respect to the 

1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air 

quality standards (NAAQS). See 69 FR 

23858. The Atlanta Area includes the 

following 20 counties: Barrow, Bartow, 

Carroll, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, 

Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, 

Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Hall, Henry, 

Newton, Paulding, Rockdale, Spalding 

and Walton.1 For background purposes, 

portions of the Atlanta Area were 

designated as a severe nonattainment 

area for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS. The 

Area was subsequently redesignated to 

attainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS 

with a maintenance plan. The original 

Atlanta 1-hour severe ozone 

nonattainment area consisted of 13 

counties including Cherokee, Clayton, 

Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, 

Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, 

Paulding and Rockdale. See 56 FR 

56694 (November 6, 1991). As such, 

major sources in the 13-county 1-hour 

ozone nonattainment area were defined 

as those sources that emit 25 tons per 

year (tpy) or more of VOC or NOX. 

Therefore, the applicability of some of 

the rules being approved in today’s 

action is for 25 tpy and above for 

sources in the 13 county area that was 

severe for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS and 

moderate for the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS; and 100 tpy and above in the 

remaining 7 counties that have only 

been classified as moderate for the 1997 

8-hour ozone NAAQS. 

On March 6, 2008, EPA reclassified 

the Atlanta Area from a marginal ozone 

nonattainment area to a moderate ozone 

nonattainment area. As a result of this 

designation and subsequent 

reclassification to moderate, Georgia 

was required to amend its SIP for the 

Atlanta Area to satisfy the requirements 

for a moderate area under CAA section 

182. Section 182(b)(2) of the CAA 

requires states to adopt RACT rules for 

all areas designated nonattainment for 

ozone and classified as moderate or 

above. The three parts of the section 

182(b)(2) RACT requirements are: (1) 

RACT for sources covered by an existing 

CTG (i.e., a CTG issued prior to 

enactment of the 1990 amendments to 

the CAA); (2) RACT for sources covered 

by a post-enactment CTG; and (3) all 

major sources not covered by a CTG 

(i.e., non-CTG sources). Pursuant to 40 

CFR 51.165, a major source for a 

moderate ozone area is a source that 

emits 100 tpy or more of VOC or NOX. 

For more information regarding the 

RACT requirements, including 

requirements and schedules for sources 

covered by CTGs, please see the 

proposed approval of this action. See 77 

FR 45307, July 31, 2012. 

II. This Action 

EPA is taking final action to approve 

several final SIP revisions submitted by 

the State of Georgia, through the GA 

EPD, to EPA on November 13, 1992, 

October 21, 2009,2 March 19, 2012,3 and 

September 7, 2012. The September 7, 

2012, SIP revision was initially 

submitted to EPA for parallel processing 

on July 19, 2012, and the final version 

was submitted to EPA on September 7, 

2012, consistent with applicable 

requirements.4 The purpose of these 

revisions is to ensure that certain VOC 

and NOX sources are controlled to levels 

that meet RACT requirements for major 

sources located in the Atlanta Area and 

meet RACT requirements for certain 

VOC source categories for which EPA 

has issued CTG. EPA has evaluated the 

revisions to Georgia’s SIP, and has made 

the determination that they are 

consistent with statutory and regulatory 

requirements and EPA guidance. 

The purpose of today’s action is to 

approve the referenced SIP revisions as 

meeting the VOC and NOX RACT 

requirements of section 182(b)(2) of the 

CAA for the Atlanta Area. On July 31, 

2012, EPA published a proposed 

rulemaking to approve, and in the 

alternative conditionally approve, the 

referenced SIP revisions. See 77 FR 

45307. EPA did not receive any public 

comments on its proposal. Since EPA 

received Georgia’s final SIP revision on 

September 7, 2012, and the final 

submittal remained unchanged from the 

State’s draft July 19, 2012, SIP revision, 

EPA is finalizing today’s action as a full 

approval and does not need to 

conditionally approve any portion of 

Georgia’s SIP revisions as meeting the 

VOC and NOX RACT requirements. 

III. Final Action 

EPA is taking final action to approve 

four SIP revisions submitted by the 

State of Georgia to address the CTG and 

RACT requirements for the Atlanta 

Area. Specifically, EPA is taking final 

action to approve final SIP revisions 

submitted to EPA from GA EPD on 

November 13, 1992, October 21, 2009 

(three separate submittals on this day), 

March 19, 2012, and September 7, 2012. 

EPA is approving these SIP revisions 

because they are consistent with the 

CAA and requirements related to VOC 

and NOX RACT. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by State law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

59556 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 189 / Friday, September 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the State, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by November 27, 2012. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. See section 

307(b)(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: September 10, 2012. 

A. Stanley Meiburg, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42.U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart L—Georgia 

■ 2. Section 52.570(c), is amended by 

revising the entries for ‘‘391–3–1.01,’’ 

‘‘391–3–1–.02(2)(a),’’ ‘‘391–3–1– 

.02(2)(t),’’ ‘‘391–3–1–.02(2)(u),’’ ‘‘391–3– 

1–.02(2)(v),’’ ‘‘391–3–1–.02(2)(w),’’ 

‘‘391–3–1–.02(2)(x),’’ ‘‘391–3–1– 

.02(2)(y),’’ ‘‘391–3–1–.02(2)(z),’’ ‘‘391– 

3–1–.02(2)(aa),’’ ‘‘391–3–1–.02(2)(ii),’’ 

‘‘391–3–1–.02(2)(jj),’’ ‘‘391–3–1– 

.02(2)(mm),’’ ‘‘391–3–1–.02(2)(pp),’’ 

‘‘391–3–1–.02(2)(rr),’’ ‘‘391–3–1– 

.02(2)(ss),’’ ‘‘391–3–1–.02(2)(tt),’’ ‘‘391– 

3–1–.02(2)(vv),’’ ‘‘391–3–1–.02(2)(yy),’’ 

‘‘391–3–1–.02(2)(ccc),’’ ‘‘391–3–1– 

.02(2)(ddd),’’ ‘‘391–3–1–.02(2)(eee),’’ 

‘‘391–3–1–.02(2)(hhh),’’ ‘‘391–3–1– 

.02(2)(kkk),’’ and ‘‘391–3–1–.02(2)(rrr)’’ 

and adding new entries for ‘‘391–3–1– 

.02(2)(vvv),’’ ‘‘391–3–1–.02(2)(yyy),’’ 

‘‘391–3–1–.02(2)(zzz),’’ and ‘‘391–3–1– 

.02(2)(aaaa)’’ to read as follows: 

§ 52.570 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA APPROVED GEORGIA REGULATIONS

State citation Title/subject State effective 

date EPA approval date Explanation 

391–3–1.01 .................................. Definitions .................................... 3/7/2012 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

*******

Emission Standards 

391–3–1–.02(2)(a) ....................... General Provisions ...................... 3/7/2012 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

Except for paragraph 391– 

3–1–.02(2)(a)1 (as approved on 3/16/06). 

*******

391–3–1–.02(2)(t) ........................ VOC Emissions from Automobile 

and Light Duty Truck Manufacturing.

3/7/2012 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

391–3–1–.02(2)(u) ....................... VOC Emissions from Can Coating.9/16/1992 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

391–3–1–.02(2)(v) ....................... VOC Emissions from Coil Coating.9/16/1992 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

391–3–1–.02(2)(w) ...................... VOC Emissions from Paper 

Coating.

3/7/2012 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 189 / Friday, September 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 59557 

EPA APPROVED GEORGIA REGULATIONS—Continued 

State citation Title/subject State effective 

date EPA approval date Explanation 

391–3–1–.02(2)(x) ....................... VOC Emissions from Fabric and 

Vinyl Coating.

9/16/1992 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

391–3–1–.02(2)(y) ....................... VOC Emissions from Metal Furniture Coating.3/7/2012 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

391–3–1–.02(2)(z) ....................... VOC Emissions from Large Appliance Surface Coating.3/7/2012 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

391–3–1–.02(2)(aa) ..................... VOC Emissions from Wire Coating.9/16/1992 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

*******

391–3–1–.02(2)(ii) ....................... VOC Emissions from Surface 

Coating of Miscellaneous Metal 

Parts and Products.

3/7/2012 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

391–3–1–.02(2)(jj) ....................... VOC Emissions from Surface 

Coating of Flat Wood Paneling.

3/7/2012 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

*******

391–3–1–.02(2)(mm) ................... VOC Emissions from Graphic 

Arts Systems.

3/7/2012 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

*******

391–3–1–.02(2)(pp) ..................... Bulk Gasoline Plants ................... 6/8/2008 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

*******

391–3–1–.02(2)(rr) ....................... Gasoline Dispensing Facilities— 

Stage I.

6/8/2008 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

391–3–1–.02(2)(ss) ..................... Gasoline Transport Systems and 

Vapor Collection Systems.

6/8/2008 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

391–3–1–.02(2)(tt) ....................... VOC Emissions from Major 

Sources.

6/8/2008 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

*******

391–3–1–.02(2)(vv) ..................... Volatile Organic Liquid Handling 

and Storage.

4/12/2009 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

391–3–1–.02(2)(yy) ..................... Emissions of Nitrogen Oxides 

from Major Sources.

4/12/2009 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

*******

391–3–1–.02(2)(ccc). ................... VOC Emissions from Bulk Mixing 

Tanks.

4/12/2009 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

391–3–1–.02(2)(ddd) ................... VOC Emissions from Offset Lithography and Letterpress.3/7/2012 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

391–3–1–.02(2)(eee) ................... VOC Emissions from expanded 

Polystyrene Products Manufacturing.

4/12/2009 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

*******

391–3–1–.02(2)(hhh) ................... Wood Furniture Finishing and 

Cleaning Operations.

4/12/2009 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

*******

391–3–1–.02(2)(kkk) .................... VOC Emissions from Aerospace 

Manufacturing and Rework Facilities.

4/12/2009 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

59558 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 189 / Friday, September 28, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

EPA APPROVED GEORGIA REGULATIONS—Continued 

State citation Title/subject State effective 

date EPA approval date Explanation 

391–3–1–.02(2)(lll) ....................... NOX Emissions from Fuel Burning Equipment.4/12/2009 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

*******

391–3–1–.02(2)(rrr) ..................... NOX Emissions from Small FuelBurning Equipment.4/12/2009 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

*******

391–3–1–.02(2)(vvv) .................... VOC Emissions from Coating 

Miscellaneous Plastic Parts 

and Products.

3/7/2012 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

391–3–1–.02(2)(yyy) .................... VOC Emissions from the use of 

Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives.

3/7/2012 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

391–3–1–.02(2)(zzz) .................... VOC Emissions from Fiberglass 

Boat Manufacturing.

3/7/2012 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

391–3–1–.02(2)(aaaa) ................. Industrial Cleaning Solvents ........ 3/7/2012 9/28/2012 [Insert citation 

of publication].

*******

[FR Doc. 2012–23710 Filed 9–27–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0758; FRL–9363–3] 

Sulfentrazone; Pesticide Tolerances 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes 

tolerances for residues of sulfentrazone 

in or on succulent soybeans. 

Interregional Research Project Number 4 

(IR–4) requested this tolerance under 

the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

Act (FFDCA). In addition, this 

regulation corrects an incorrect 

commodity definition in the table. The 

term ‘‘Berry, low growing, group 13–07’’ 

is being revised to its correct term 

‘‘Berry and small fruit, group 13–07.’’ 

DATES: This regulation is effective 

September 28, 2012. Objections and 

requests for hearings must be received 

on or before November 27, 2012, and 

must be filed in accordance with the 

instructions provided in 40 CFR part 

178 (see also Unit I.C. of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0758, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West 

Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. The 

Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 

a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 

telephone number for the Public 

Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and 

the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andrew Ertman, Registration Division 

(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; telephone number: 

(703) 308–9367; email address: 

ertman.andrew@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

B. How can I get electronic access to 

other related information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of EPA’s tolerance 

regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through 

the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR 

site at http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/ 

text/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/ 

Title40/40tab_02.tpl. 

C. How can I file an objection or hearing 

request? 

Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 

U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 

objection to any aspect of this regulation 

and may also request a hearing on those 

objections. You must file your objection 

or request a hearing on this regulation 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 

proper receipt by EPA, you must 

identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2011–0758 in the subject line on 

the first page of your submission. All 

objections and requests for a hearing 

must be in writing, and must be 

received by the Hearing Clerk on or 

before November 27, 2012. Addresses 

for mail and hand delivery of objections 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES