alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
39–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 109–202 

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 2985, LEGISLATIVE BRANCH APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2006 

JULY 27, 2005.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 396] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 396, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference 

report to accompany H.R. 2985, the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2006, and against its consideration. The resolution also 

provides that the conference report shall be considered as read. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order is necessary because the conference report was filed with the House on Wednesday, July 27, 

2005 and it may be considered by the House as early as Thursday, 

July 28, 2005, which would violate clause 8 of rule XXII (requiring 

a three-day layover of conference reports and the accompanying 

joint explanatory statement). 

Æ
#### § 1312.7 Derivative classification.

A *derivative classification* means that the information is in substance the same information that is currently classified, usually by another agency or classification authority. The application of derivative classification markings is the responsibility of the person who incorporates, restates, paraphrases, or generates in new form information that is already classified, or one who applies such classification markings in accordance with instructions from an authorized classifier or classification guide. Extreme care must be taken to continue classification and declassification markings when such information is incorporated into OMB documents. The duplication or reproduction of existing classified information is not derivative classification. Persons who use derivative classification need not possess original classification authority.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GLOBAL EPOINT, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended June 30,, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Toresa Lou, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|August 21, 2006        
|                       
|/s/    TORESA LOU      
|Toresa Lou,            
|Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GLOBAL EPOINT, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Pan, Chief Financial Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|August 21, 2006                     
|                                    
|/s/    JOHN PAN                     
|John Pan,                           
|Chief Financial Officer and Chairman

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### FARMERS’ ELEVATOR & IMPLEMENT CO., Appellant, v. HOBERG et al, Respondents.

(192 N. W. 179.)

(File No. 5320.

Opinion filed February 20, 1923.)

Appeal, and Error — Briefs—Failure to File Anything More Than Notice of Appeal With 'Undei'taking Held Abandonment of Appeal.

Where, after notice of appeal with an undertaking, appellant fails to file any brief, stipulations, or other papers, the appeal will be deemed abandoned.

Appeal from Circuit Court, McPherson County; Hon. J. H. Bottom, Judge.

Action- by the 'Farmers’ Elevator & Implement Company against John A. Hoberg and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

*251*W. S. Lauder,*of Wahpeton, N. D., and *B- C. Sigler,*of Le•ola, for Appellant.

*Brans Schubeck,*of Ashley, N. D., and *C. S. Acker,*of Leola, dor Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

On March 4, 1922, notice of appeal was ■filed in this court in the above-entitled action, together with an undertaking on appeal. Since that time no briefs, stipulations, or ■other papers have been filed by appellant. Appellant being in default, the appeal will be deemed abandoned, and the judgment .■and order appealed from will be affirmed.

Note — Reported in 192 N. TV. 17 9. See American Key-Numbered Digest, Appeal and Error, Key-No. 805, 4 C. J. Secs. 2437-2423,
### §21a. National mining and minerals policy; "minerals" defined; execution of policy under other authorized programs

The Congress declares that it is the continuing policy of the Federal Government in the national interest to foster and encourage private enterprise in (1) the development of economically sound and stable domestic mining, minerals, metal and mineral reclamation industries, (2) the orderly and economic development of domestic mineral resources, reserves, and reclamation of metals and minerals to help assure satisfaction of industrial, security and environmental needs, (3) mining, mineral, and metallurgical research, including the use and recycling of scrap to promote the wise and efficient use of our natural and reclaimable mineral resources, and (4) the study and development of methods for the disposal, control, and reclamation of mineral waste products, and the reclamation of mined land, so as to lessen any adverse impact of mineral extraction and processing upon the physical environment that may result from mining or mineral activities.

For the purpose of this section "minerals" shall include all minerals and mineral fuels including oil, gas, coal, oil shale and uranium.

It shall be the responsibility of the Secretary of the Interior to carry out this policy when exercising his authority under such programs as may be authorized by law other than this section.

(Pub. L. 91–631, title I, §101, formerly §2, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1876; Pub. L. 104–66, title I, §1081(b), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 721; renumbered title I, §101, Pub. L. 104–325, §2(1), (2), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3994.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1995—Pub. L. 104–66 in last par. struck out at end "For this purpose the Secretary of the Interior shall include in his annual report to the Congress a report on the state of the domestic mining, minerals, and mineral reclamation industries, including a statement of the trend in utilization and depletion of these resources, together with such recommendations for legislative programs as may be necessary to implement the policy of this section."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 91–631, §1, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1876, provided: "That this Act [enacting this section] may be cited as the 'Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970'."
§ 1001.102 What are the Privacy Act rules of conduct? ( a ) An employee shall avoid any action that results in the appearance of using public office to collect or gain access to personal data about individuals beyond that required by or authorized for the performance of duties.
( b ) An employee shall not use any personal data about individuals for any purpose other than as is required and authorized in the performance of assigned duties. An employee shall not disclose any such information to other agencies or persons not expressly authorized to receive or have access to such information. An employee shall make any authorized disclosures in accordance with established regulations and procedures.
( c ) Each employee who has access to or is engaged in any way in the handling of information subject to the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, shall be familiar with the regulations of this subsection as well as the pertinent provisions of the Privacy Act relating to the treatment of such information.
§ 4.66 Verification of inspection. ( a ) No clearance shall be granted unless the port director is satisfied that a proper certificate of inspection is in force and the vessel is in compliance with such certificate, if the vessel is: ( 1 ) A vessel of the United States required to be inspected as specified in Title 46, Code of Federal Regulations.
( 2 ) A foreign vessel carrying passengers from the United States.
( b ) In the case of vessels of foreign nations which are signatories of the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1948, carrying passengers from the United States, an unexpired Certificate of Examination for Foreign Passenger Vessel, Form CG-989, or an unexpired Certificate for Foreign Vessel to Carry Persons in Addition to Crew, Form CG-3463, issued by the United States Coast Guard, may be accepted as evidence that a proper certificate of inspection is in force and the vessel is in compliance with such certificate.
( c ) In the case of vessels of the United States subject to inspection proceeding to another port for repairs, a valid Permit to Proceed to Another Port for Repairs, Form CG-948, issued by the United States Coast Guard, shall be accepted in lieu of the certificate of inspection required by this section.
[T.D. 56173, 29 FR 6681, May 22, 1964, as amended by T.D. 69-266, 34 FR 20422, Dec. 31, 1969]
#### § 208.11 Time for filing.

A request or petition may be filed with the Commission not earlier than the date that is 270 days, and not later than 240 days, before the date on which any action taken under section 324 of the Act of is to terminate.
### §§5126 to 5129. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–244, div. B, title I, §118(a), Sept. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 2930

Section 5126, Pub. L. 91–665, ch. VIII, Jan. 8, 1971, 84 Stat. 1989; Pub. L. 93–532, §1(a), Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1723; Pub. L. 99–151, title I, §102(b), Nov. 13, 1985, 99 Stat. 797; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §203(2), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1725, provided for an allowance for former Speaker for payment of office and other administrative expenses.

Section 5127, Pub. L. 91–665, ch. VIII, Jan. 8, 1971, 84 Stat. 1989; Pub. L. 93–532, §1(a), Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1723, related to franked mail and printing privileges of former Speaker.

Section 5128, Pub. L. 91–665, ch. VIII, Jan. 8, 1971, 84 Stat. 1989; Pub. L. 93–532, §1(a), Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1723; Pub. L. 95–94, title I, §115, Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 668; Pub. L. 99–151, title I, §102(a), Nov. 13, 1985, 99 Stat. 797; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §203(3), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1725; Pub. L. 108–447, div. G, title I, §110, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3177; Pub. L. 110–161, div. H, title I, §105, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2225, provided for Staff assistance to a former Speaker for administration and compensation and status of staff.

Section 5129, Pub. L. 103–69, title I, §101A(a), Aug. 11, 1993, 107 Stat. 699, provided that the entitlements of a former Speaker of the House of Representatives under sections 5125 to 5129 of this title would be available for 5 years.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable with respect to any individual who serves as a Representative in Congress during the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress or any succeeding Congress, see section 118(c) of Pub. L. 115–244, set out as a note under section 5125 of this title.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAeroelastic stability and response of rotating structuresA summary of the work performed during the progress period is presented. Analysis methods for predicting loads and instabilities of wind turbines were developed. Three new areas of research to aid the Advanced Turboprop Project (ATP) were initiated and developed. These three areas of research are aeroelastic analysis methods for cascades including blade and disk flexibility; stall flutter analysis; and computational aeroelasticity.Document ID19930007371Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsKeith, Theo G., Jr.*(Toledo Univ. OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1993Subject CategoryAircraft Stability And ControlReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:191803NASA-CR-191803Accession Number93N16560Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NSG-3139Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930007371.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 32

<PAGE>

                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Herbert W. Watts, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Johnnie L. Craft,
Treasurer, of Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") each certify in his
capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the Annual Report of
the Company on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2003 and that to the best
of his knowledge:

1.       the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of
         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Great Pee Dee
Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


September 26, 2003                         /s/ Herbert W. Watts
-------------------                        -------------------------------------
Date                                       Herbert W. Watts
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


September 26, 2003                         /s/ Johnnie L. Craft
------------------                         -------------------------------------
Date                                       Johnnie L. Craft
                                           Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)
UNITED SIAT[S 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

%'7 -V"" VAS141%C1O0. VC M-55r N a

OF1E Of(1IN[ 

KE.CRANDUM FOR: 

ES3JECT:

April 3, 19E7 0T

victor Stello, Or. 

Executive Director for Operations 

ofU'ohn C. Hoyle, Acting Secretary 

SECY-67-66 - PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS FROY 

10 CFR PART 171, ANNUAL FEE FOR 

POW-R REACTOP OPERATING L3CENSES

This is to advise you that the Co.nsission has not objected 

to your proposed grant of partial exemption from the Part 

171 annual fee for Yankee Nuclear Power Station, Big Rock 

Point, and the La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor. 

Copies: 

Chairman Zech 

Commissioner Roberts 

Comnissioner Asselstine 

Commissioner Bernthal 

Coznissioner Carr 

OGC (H Street)
June 24, 2015

Mr. Julio Quintana Jr.

8 Red Oak Court Baiting Hollow, NY 11933

Dear Mr. Quintana:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your March 30, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0829), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6670

TAHRIM SUPREME C. JIHAD, a/k/a Vincent Edward

Little,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM E. GUNN; RAYMOND J. ROSSI; RHETT

JACKSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CA-95-3596-2-22AJ)

Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 3, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tahrim Supreme C. Jihad, Appellant Pro Se. Carl Norman Lundberg,

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICES,

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. Appellant's case was referred to a

magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The

magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised

Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based

upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to

object to the magistrate judge's recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by

failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 2, 2005 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and2)
    
    the information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending October 2, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Philip R. MengelPhilip R. MengelChief Executive OfficerDated: November 16, 2005
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis Form REP-702 Rev. 0, 4/2012



### Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 10/26/2012 Sample Number: 124510-001 Date Collected:10/15/2012 14:35 Date Received:10/17/2012 

### 1st Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ng/L Mercury, Hg 25.2 2 TLT EPA 1631E 0.8 10/24/2012 

### Sample Number: 124510-002 Date Collected: 10/15/2012 14:30 Date Received:10/17/2012 

### Bioreactor Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ng/L Mercury, Hg 2.1 1 TLT EPA 1631E 0.4 10/24/2012

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 124510 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-78295, 333-48154, 333-48156, 333-65130, 333-83818,333-99385, and 333-113738 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-113737 on Form S-3 of BUCA Inc. and subsidiaries of our report on the consolidated financial statements dated July 25, 2005, (which report expresses an unqualified opinion andincludes an explanatory paragraph relating to the restatement of the 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial statements as discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements) and our report on internal control over financial reporting (whichreport expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting because of material weaknesses), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of BUCA, Inc. and subsidiaries for the fiscal yearended December 26, 2004. 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota 

July 25, 2005