UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F/A(Amendment No. 1)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended November 27, 2004

Commission file number: #000-29506

NOVAMERICAN STEEL INC.(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Canada(Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

6001 Irwin Street, LaSalle, Québec, Canada H8N 1A1(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Shares, without nominal or par value

(Title of Class)

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:



Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or common stock as of November 27, 2004:

| |  | 9,786,089 |  | Common Shares   
| |  | --------- |  | ----------------
| |  | -0-       |  | Preferred Shares

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

|Yes                                                                                         |  | ý | No      |  | o |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ------- |  | - |  | 
|Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
|Item 17                                                                                     |  | o | Item 18 |  | ý |  | 



---





EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Form 20-F/A is being filed by Novamerican Steel Inc. (the "Company") as Amendment No. 1 to its Annual Report on
Form 20-F filed on February 23, 2005 (the "Form 20-F"). The purpose of this Amendment No. 1 is to amend and restate Items 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 16C
and 19 in their entirety in order to conform the disclosures therein to disclosures contained in the Company's Registration Statement on Form F-3. Only these revised sections are
included in this Amendment No. 1. This Form 20-F/A does not change the other disclosures set forth in the Form 20-F as originally filed and, except as
expressly indicated herein, does not reflect events occurring after or provide information subsequent to, the original filing date of the Form 20-F.

STATEMENT ON FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Except for the statements of historical fact contained herein, the information under the headings "Information on the Company", "Item 5 Operating and Financial
Review and Prospects", "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk" and elsewhere in the Form 20-F as amended by this Amendment No. 1 constitutes "forward-looking
statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this Amendment No. 1 and the Form 20-F, the words "anticipate," "expect," "believe,"
"estimate," "project" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those
identified in the section captioned "Key InformationRisk Factors". Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual
results may vary materially from those anticipated, expected, believed, estimated or projected. We undertake no obligation to publicly release, furnish or file the result of any revision to the
forward-looking statements herein that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

PART I

ITEM 3 KEY INFORMATION

Selected Financial Data

The selected financial data presented below, other than references to tons sold and processed, have been derived from our consolidated financial statements for
the five years ended November 27, 2004, which were audited by Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP, Chartered Accountants. The selected financial data presented below should be read in conjunction
with, and are qualified in their entirety by, "Operating and Financial Review and Prospects," the consolidated financial statements and other financial information included elsewhere in this document.
All financial data presented is expressed in U.S. dollars.

|                                                 |  | Years Ended (a) |        
|------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------- | -------
|
|
|Statement of Operations Data:                    |  |                 |        
|Net sales                                        |  | $               | 478,506
|Cost of sales                                    |  |                 | 375,777
|                                                 |  |                 |        
|Gross margin                                     |  |                 | 102,729
|Operating expenses                               |  |                 | 75,801 
|                                                 |  |                 |        
|Operating income                                 |  |                 | 26,928 
|Interest expense                                 |  |                 | 6,426  
|Share in income of joint ventures                |  |                 | (711   
|                                                 |  |                 |        
|Income before income taxes and minority interest |  |                 | 21,213 
|Income taxes                                     |  |                 | 8,021  
|                                                 |  |                 |        
|Income before minority interest                  |  |                 | 13,192 
|Minority interest                                |  |                 | 180    
|                                                 |  |                 |        
|Net income                                       |  | $               | 13,012 
|                                                 |  |                 |        
|                                                 |  |                 |        

2

---



|Basic income per share (b)                       |                 | $ | 1.34      |         | $ | 0.83      |         | $ | 2.07      |         | $ | 1.35      |         | $ | 7.51      |        
|------------------------------------------------ | --------------- | - | --------- | ------- | - | --------- | ------- | - | --------- | ------- | - | --------- | ------- | - | --------- | -------
|                                                 |                 |   |           |         |   |           |         |   |           |         |  
|Diluted income per share (b)                     |                 | $ | 1.34      |         | $ | 0.83      |         | $ | 2.07      |         | $ | 1.35      |         | $ | 7.35      |        
|                                                 |                 |   |           |         |   |           |         |   |           |         |  
|Operating income per share                       |                 | $ | 2.78      |         | $ | 1.89      |         | $ | 3.56      |         | $ | 2.37      |         | $ | 12.05     |        
|                                                 |                 |   |           |         |   |           |         |   |           |         |  
|Weighted average common shares outstanding       |                 |   | 9,700,000 |         |   | 9,700,000 |         |   | 9,700,000 |         |   | 9,700,000 |         |   | 9,707,270 |        
|                                                 |                 |   |           |         |   |           |         |   |           |         |  
|Other Data:                                      |                 |   |           |         |   |           |         |   |           |         |   |           |         |   |           |        
|EBITDA (c)                                       |                 | $ | 32,731    |         | $ | 24,391    |         | $ | 41,488    |         | $ | 30,521    |         | $ | 126,879   |        
|Depreciation and amortization                    |                 | $ | 5,272     |         | $ | 6,019     |         | $ | 6,228     |         | $ | 6,962     |         | $ | 8,680     |        
|Capital expenditures                             |                 | $ | 24,128    |         | $ | 9,279     |         | $ | 13,512    |         | $ | 25,140    |         | $ | 9,056     |        
|Dividends paid                                   |                 |   |          |         |   |          |         |   |          |         |   |          |         |   |          |        
|Gross margin                                     |                 |   | 21.5      | %       |   | 22.8      | %       |   | 24.5      | %       |   | 21.0      | %       |   | 29.3      | %      
|Operating margin                                 |                 |   | 5.6       | %       |   | 4.4       | %       |   | 7.4       | %       |   | 4.5       | %       |   | 15.3      | %      
|Income before income taxes and minority interest |                 |   | 4.4       | %       |   | 2.9       | %       |   | 6.5       | %       |   | 3.6       | %       |   | 14.7      | %      
|Tons sold and processed (unaudited):             |                 |   |           |         |   |           |         |   |           |         |   |           |         |   |           |        
|                                                 | Direct sales    |   |           | 795,000 |   |           | 773,000 |   |           | 867,000 |   |           | 870,000 |   |           | 914,000
|                                                 | Toll processing |   |           | 599,000 |   |           | 667,000 |   |           | 737,000 |   |           | 794,000 |   |           | 901,000
|                                                 |                 |   |           |         |   |           |         |   |           |         |  
|                                                 |                 |   | 1,394,000 |         |   | 1,440,000 |         |   | 1,604,000 |         |   | 1,664,000 |         |   | 1,815,000 |        
|                                                 |                 |   |           |         |   |           |         |   |           |         |  

|                    |  | Nov. 25,
2000 |         | Nov. 24,
2001 |   | Nov. 30,
2002 |  | Nov. 29,
2003 |         | Nov. 27,
2004
|------------------- |  | ------------- | ------- | ------------- | - | ------------- |  | ------------- | ------- | -------------
|
|Balance Sheet Data: |  |               |         |               |   |               |  |               |         |              
|Current assets      |  | $             | 153,568 |               | $ | 140,548       |  | $             | 164,775 |              
|Current liabilities |  |               | 113,677 |               |   | 64,494        |  |               | 77,970  |              
|Working capital     |  |               | 39,891  |               |   | 76,054        |  |               | 86,805  |              
|Total assets        |  |               | 242,077 |               |   | 236,962       |  |               | 271,705 |              
|Total debt          |  |               | 82,545  |               |   | 74,684        |  |               | 73,073  |              
|Net assets          |  |               | 93,288  |               |   | 99,668        |  |               | 119,867 |              
|Share capital       |  |               | 28,404  |               |   | 28,404        |  |               | 28,404  |              

---

| |                               | Years Ended (1)
| | ----------------------------- | ---------------
|
|
| | Net income                    |                
| | Income taxes                  |                
| | Interest expense              |                
| | Depreciation and amortization |                
| |                               |                
| | EBITDA                        |                
| |                               |                



3

---





Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the following risks and uncertanties which may have a material effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.

The prices we pay for steel and other raw materials, and the prices we are able to charge our customers for our products, may fluctuate due to a number of factors beyond our
control, which could negatively impact the prices of our products, reduce our margins of profitability, and weaken our financial condition

The principal raw material used in our operations is flat rolled carbon steel which we typically purchase from steel producers. The steel industry as a whole is
cyclical. At times pricing and availability of steel can be volatile due to numerous factors beyond our control, including general, regional and international economic conditions, production levels,
competition, import duties and tariffs and currency exchange rates.

As a steel service center, we generally maintain substantial inventories of steel to accommodate the short lead times and just-in-time delivery requirements of our customers.
Accordingly, we purchase steel in an effort to maintain our inventory at levels that we believe to be appropriate to satisfy the anticipated needs of our customers based upon historical buying
practices, contracts with customers and market conditions. We generally purchase steel at prevailing market prices in effect at the time we place our orders. When raw material prices increase,
competitive conditions will influence how much of the steel price increase can be passed on by us to our customers. When raw material prices are decreasing, we face the challenge of selling the
inventory that we acquire at a relatively higher cost at the decreasing prices. Thus, decreases in raw material prices could result in lower sale prices and lower margins for our products.

In recent years, our steel suppliers have been significantly impacted by the shortage of raw materials resulting in unprecedented cost increases affecting scrap, coke, iron ore and
energy. At times, this affected the availability and prices of flat rolled carbon steel. Effective in January 2004, North American steel producers implemented raw material surcharges to offset
these costs at least until these shortages subside. More recently, due in part to the surcharges and a number of additional factors, including the strengthening of the general economy, the increased
consolidation of North American steel producers and the increasing demands for steel from the Asian markets, there has been a sharp rise in the price




we pay for certain raw materials. As a result, we have increased prices for our flat rolled carbon steel products in part to pass on these surcharges to our customers. We may not be able to pass on
these surcharges and price increases to our customers in the future. In addition, certain of our customers are paying the additional amounts related to the surcharges under protest.

During fiscal 2004, the prices we charged for our products and services were at record high levels. We may not be able to maintain these prices in the future. The occurrence of one or
more of the above events could negatively impact the prices of our products, reduce our margins or profitability, and weaken our financial condition.

Our business may be affected by the cyclicality of the industries that purchase our products. Reduced demand from any one of these industries could result in lower operating
income and profitability

Certain of our products are sold to industries, including the automotive industry, that experience significant fluctuations in demand based on general economic
conditions, seasonality and other factors beyond our control. As a result, we may not be able to increase or maintain our level of sales or prices in periods of economic stagnation or downturn.

Sales
of our products for use in the automotive industry accounted for approximately 21.4% of our net sales in fiscal 2004 and approximately 21.7% of our net sales in fiscal 2003. Such
sales include sales

4

---



directly
to the automobile manufacturers and to their component and parts suppliers as well as to manufacturers supplying the automotive "after market" components and parts. The automobile industry
experiences fluctuation in demand based on numerous factors such as general economic conditions and consumer confidence. The automobile industry is also subject, from time to time, to labor problems,
which may result in reduced demand for our products during work stoppages.

We may not be able to grow our business in the future or to manage our expansion effectively

Historically, we have managed to grow our business internally and through acquisitions. In the future, we may not be able to identify and capture growth
opportunities and, therefore, we may not be able to grow our business at the rate we did in the past or at all. Any new facility or operation or any future acquisitions, if completed, may not be
profitable.

In addition, the expansion of an existing facility or the construction of a new facility could hinder our results of operations due to the impact of start-up costs and the potential for
underutilization in the start-up phase of a facility. Acquisitions could result in unforeseen difficulties in integrating the acquired businesses with our existing business and could divert a
disproportionate amount of management time and attention. The incurrence of additional indebtedness to pay for expansion costs or acquisition costs could harm our liquidity and financial stability.
Moreover, any issuance by us of common shares to effect acquisitions could result in dilution to our shareholders. Although we frequently evaluate potential acquisitions, we currently have no
understandings, agreements or commitments to make any acquisitions.

Our results of operations may be impacted and adversely affected by fluctuations in foreign exchange rates

We are subject to exchange rate fluctuations that are beyond our control. Some of our revenues are derived from sales made by Canadian subsidiaries into the
United States, which are denominated in U.S. dollars, and converted into Canadian dollars based upon the average monthly exchange rate at the time of sale. If we are not able to successfully hedge our
currency exposure, changes in the rate of exchange between the Canadian dollar and the U.S. dollar may negatively impact our results of operations and cash flow. See "Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk."

Our Canadian operations subject us to currency translation risk which could cause our reported results to fluctuate significantly from period to period

We receive a material portion of our revenue from our Canadian operations and as such our primary functional currency is the Canadian dollar. However, for each
reporting period, we translate the results of operations and financial condition into United States dollars. Therefore, our reported results of operations and financial condition are subject to
changes in the exchange relationship between the two currencies. For example, as the relationship of the Canadian dollar strengthens against the U.S. dollar, our revenue, as reported, is favorably
affected and conversely expenses are unfavorably affected. Fluctuations in the relative values of the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar could negatively affect our results of operations and assets
and liabilities as reported in our financial statements.

We could incur substantial costs in order to comply with, or to address any violations under, environmental laws that could significantly increase our operating expenses and
reduce our operating income

The nature of our business may expose us to environmental liability claims, even if such claims are without merit. One of our subsidiaries, American Steel and
Aluminum Corporation, or American Steel, was named as one of 19 defendants in an action brought in October 2001 by two private parties under the Comprehensive Environmental Response
Compensation and Liability Act,or CERCLA, to recover

5

---



costs incurred and to be incurred in connection with a waste disposal facility in Cumberland, RI which has been categorized as a Superfund site by federal authorities. The complaint was subsequently
amended twice to add additional defendants, aggregating to a total of 57 defendants. The plaintiffs claim that we are liable based upon alleged shipments to the site by American Steel, prior to its
acquisition by us in 1996. The plaintiffs have identified over 100 potentially responsible parties, or PRPs. Additionally, the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, has issued claim notice letters
to 63 parties, some of which are defendants in the lawsuit. We did receive, on or about April 25, 2003, an EPA claim letter seeking reimbursement of costs incurred and to be incurred at the
site. American Steel responded to the claim by denying liability for the site, but was also working with other PRPs to evaluate its options for resolving the matter. The plaintiffs seek recovery of
investigative expenses incurred and to be incurred, together with a declaration of liability for all future remediation costs at the site. We do not believe it is currently possible to estimate our
share, if any, of such investigative expenses or future remediation costs with reasonable certainty. The defendants have formed a PRP committee (in which we are participating) to monitor the site
investigation. We believe that we have meritorious defenses against the claims raised in the action and we intend to defend our position vigorously should the litigation proceed. However, we may not
prevail should the litigation proceed and any significant loss could reduce our earnings.

In
addition, our processing centers and manufacturing facilities are subject to many federal, state, provincial and local laws and regulations in the United States and Canada relating to
the protection of the environment. We have made, and will continue to make, expenditures to remain in compliance with such laws and regulations. We believe that our facilities are in material
compliance with these laws and regulations, as such currently exist, and we do not believe that continued compliance with such existing laws and regulations will have an adverse effect on our results
of operations or financial condition. However, we cannot predict the environmental laws or regulations that may be enacted in the future or how existing or future laws and regulations will be
administered or interpreted. Compliance with more stringent laws or regulations, as well as more vigorous enforcement policies of the regulatory agencies or stricter interpretations of existing laws
and regulations, may require additional expenditures by us which could vary substantially from those currently anticipated.

Certain
of the facilities that we occupy have been in operation for many years and, over such time, we and the prior owners or operators of such properties may have generated and
disposed of wastes which
are or may be considered hazardous. Accordingly, it is possible that additional environmental liabilities may arise in the future as a result of any such waste generation and disposal.

We depend on our senior management team and the loss of any member could prevent us from implementing our business strategy

The success of our business is dependent upon the management and leadership of D. Bryan Jones, our chairman, president and chief executive officer, and certain
other members of our senior management team. In addition, our decentralized corporate structure requires that each of our facility managers perform important management and leadership functions. The
loss of any of these individuals or our inability to attract, retain and maintain additional personnel could adversely affect our ability to conduct, manage and grow our business. We may not be able
to retain our existing senior management personnel or to attract additional qualified personnel.

Our business is highly competitive and increased competition could reduce our sales and profitability

The principal markets that we serve are highly competitive. We compete on a regional basis with steel service centers and, to a certain degree, primary steel
producers and intermediate steel processors. We have different competitors for each of our products and within each region that we serve. Certain of these competitors have financial and operating
resources in excess of our financial and operating

6

---



resources. Although we have been able to successfully compete in the past, we may not be able to continue to do so. Increased competition could harm our net sales and profitability in the future.

Our operations may be impacted by future labor negotiations or work stoppages

Certain of our employees at 11 of our 23 facilities are organized by the United Steelworkers, the Teamsters, the Sheet Metal Workers and independent employees
associations, representing in the aggregate approximately 335 of our 1,104 employees. Our labor contracts expire on staggered dates. As of March 3, 2005, the labor contract with the Sheet Metal
Workers covering 31 employees at one of our Lachine facilities was extended such that it will now expire on November 30, 2009. The labor contract with the United Steelworkers covering 49
employees at our Auburn and Cumberland facilities will expire on June 30, 2005. The labor contract with the Teamsters covering 17 employees at our Ashland facility expired on April 30,
2005, and is currently being renegotiated. Widespread work stoppages could





have a direct negative impact on our ability to conduct business, continue production, and on our earnings.

We may incur additional risks as we continue to borrow money

Our indebtedness may increase as we continue to borrow under existing or future credit arrangements in order to finance greenfield projects, expansion activities,
future acquisitions and as we continue to borrow for our general corporate purposes. Risks of increased indebtedness include greater sensitivity to adverse economic conditions, the potential inability
to fund future working capital, acquisitions, capital expenditures and other general corporate requirements, limits on our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the
steel industry, limits on future borrowings under our existing or future credit arrangements, which could affect our ability to pay our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs, the inability
to generate sufficient funds to cover required interest payments, and restrictions on our ability to refinance our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms.

Restrictive loan covenants may limit our ability to develop greenfield projects or to pursue acquisitions

Certain of our credit facilities contain covenants restricting or limiting our ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends or
make other restricted payments, dispose of or create a charge or lien on our assets, and make capital expenditures and other investments. These restrictions may limit our ability to develop greenfield
projects, pursue acquisitions and achieve our growth strategies.

We are dependent on our subsidiaries

We have no direct business operations other than our ownership of the share capital of our subsidiaries. As a holding company, we are dependent on dividends,
interest payments, management fees or other inter-company transfers of funds from our subsidiaries to enable us to meet our direct obligations. Our credit facilities restrict the payment to us of
dividends and interest from our subsidiaries under certain conditions.

If our customers, which are primarily North American manufacturing and industrial companies, relocate operations or outsource functions overseas, we could lose their business

Our customer base is located in the United States and Canada and consists primarily of manufacturing and industrial companies. We do not currently operate
facilities outside of North America. Therefore, in the event our customers relocate production operations or outsource particular functions overseas, we could lose their business, which could harm our
results of operations and financial condition.

7

---



It may be difficult to trade our common shares

Although our common shares are registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and quoted on the Nasdaq National Market, until recently, there was a limited
volume of trading of our common shares. Accordingly, investors may not be able to rapidly divest a portion of their common shares or liquidate their investment should they desire to do so.

The market price for our common shares may be volatile

In recent periods, there has been substantial volatility in the market price for our common shares. In addition, the market price of our common shares could
fluctuate substantially in the future in response to a number of factors, including the following:



In addition, in recent years, the stock market in general has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market prices of
securities issued by many companies for reasons unrelated to their operating performance. These broad market fluctuations may result in a decrease of our share price, regardless of our results of
operations.

Future sales of our common shares could depress the market price of our common shares and diminish the value of your investment

Future sales of our common shares could result in a decrease of the prevailing market price of our common shares, especially if our existing shareholders were to
sell a large number of common shares, or if we were to issue a large number of our common shares. Moreover, the perception in the public market that our existing shareholders might sell additional
common shares could depress the market for our common shares.

Our principal shareholders have the ability to exert significant control in matters requiring a shareholder vote and could delay, deter or prevent a change in control

Approximately 82.1% of our outstanding common shares (including 663,911 shares subject to currently exercisable options held by certain of our officers) are
beneficially owned by certain of our officers and directors. As a result, these officers and directors have and will collectively retain the power to elect our entire board of directors and to
determine the outcome of any other matters submitted to our shareholders for approval.

Through
the foregoing persons continued concentration of voting power, they could delay, deter or prevent a change of control of our company or other business combinations that might
otherwise be beneficial to our other shareholders. In deciding on how to vote on such matters, such persons may be influenced by interests that conflict with yours.

8

---



The staggered nature of our board of directors, as well as the proposed amendment to our articles of incorporation, could delay, deter or prevent a change of control

Our board of directors currently consists of six members. Our articles of incorporation provide for our board of directors to be divided into three groups, with
staggered three-year terms. As a result, only one group of directors (each group being currently comprised of two directors) will be elected at each annual meeting of our shareholders.
Further, at our annual and special meeting of shareholders held on March 29, 2005, our shareholders approved an amendment to our articles of incorporation that authorized our board of directors
to appoint, between annual meetings of shareholders, one or more additional directors who would hold office for a term expiring not later than the close of our following annual meeting of shareholders
(unless such appointed directors are then elected as directors by our shareholders), provided that the total number of directors so appointed may not exceed one third of the number of directors
elected at the previous annual meeting of our shareholders.

The staggered nature of our board of directors and our board's ability to appoint one or more additional directors may make it more difficult for our shareholders to replace our board of
directors and may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers or preventing or delaying changes in control of our company that might otherwise be beneficial to our shareholders.

We do not intend to pay dividends

We never declared or paid dividends on our common shares in the past, and we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common shares for the foreseeable
future. At present, we intend to retain any future earnings to finance our operations and expansion.

ITEM 4 INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

History and Development of the Company

Novamerican Steel Inc. was incorporated on April 4, 1997 under the Canada Business Corporations Act. Our registered office, principal place of
business and principal executive offices are located at 6001 Irwin Street, LaSalle, Québec, Canada H8N 1A1. Our telephone number at the principal executive offices is
(514) 335-6682.

Following
our incorporation, a reorganization of the various operations wholly-owned or controlled by D. Bryan Jones, our president and chief executive officer, or Scott B. Jones, a vice
president and our secretary and the son of D. Bryan Jones, occurred pursuant to which we became the holding company for two main operating groups: (i) our Canadian affiliates, consisting of
Nova Steel Ltd., Metco Steel (formerly one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and since January 1, 2005, a division of Nova Steel Ltd.), Nova Tube Inc., Cresswell Roll
Forming Inc., Argo Steel Ltd., Nova Tube Ontario Inc., Nova Steel Processing Centre Ltd. and Delta Tube and Company, Limited, and (ii) our U.S. affiliates,
consisting of Integrated Steel Industries, Inc., a U.S. holding company, American Steel and Aluminum Corporation, Nova Tube and Steel, Inc. and Nova Tube Indiana, LLC.

Nova
Steel Ltd. was established as a processor of hot-rolled carbon steel in 1979. In 1983, Nova Steel Ltd. acquired and installed its first tube mill in
Montréal. In 1987, this operation became Nova Steel Ltd.'s (60%) contribution to a joint venture, Delta Tube and Company, Limited, for the toll rolling of tubing, with Ispat
Sidbec Inc. (40%). In 1985, the majority of the shares of Cresswell Roll Forming Inc., a roll forming, stamping and manufacturing business in Québec, were acquired. In
1989, Argo Steel Ltd., a processor of hot-rolled, cold-rolled and galvanized steel products was established in Montréal with a 50.9% interest at the time. This expansion was
followed in October 1991 with the establishment of Metco Steel Inc. (which since January 1, 2005 became a division of Nova Steel Ltd.) This company is a processor of carbon
steel plate and plate coil and operates in a Montréal location,

9

---



formerly
occupied by Candiv Steel, a company whose equipment and inventories were purchased by Nova Steel Ltd. in February 1991.

In
July 1991, Nova Tube Inc. acquired a tube mill operation in Baie d'Urfé, Québec and, in May 1996, Nova Tube Ontario Inc. was
established with the installation of a tube mill in Mississauga, Ontario specifically designed to meet the needs of high pressure hydroforming for the automotive industry.

American
Steel, which was founded in 1962 and which we acquired in August 1996, operates in nine locations in the Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic United States. American Steel is a
distributor of steel, aluminum and stainless steel products including hot and cold-rolled carbon steel, aluminum, stainless steel, alloy and coated products in sheet, coil, bar, shapes, tubular and
plate forms.

On
November 7, 1997, we completed our initial public offering of 2,200,000 shares of our common stock and, at such time, our shares of common stock were listed on Nasdaq where
they continue to trade under the symbol, "TONS".

In
December 1998, we, through our then 50.9% owned subsidiary, Argo Steel Ltd., acquired the assets of a steel slitting operation and established a processing center in
Brampton, Ontario where we installed a .134" X 75" blanking line.

During
1998, we also built a processing facility in Stoney Creek, Ontario, Nova Steel Processing Centre Ltd. and installed a 400,000 ton per year pickling line together with a new
200,000 ton per year slitting line. Both the pickling line and the slitting line were commissioned and went into full production during the first quarter of 1999. A second slitting line installed in
2000 has been in full production since 2001.

During
2000, Novamerican Tube Holdings, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Integrated Steel Industries, Inc., formed a joint venture with Bethlehem Steel Corporation, or
Bethlehem, under the corporate name BethNova Tube, LLC, or BethNova, to produce steel tubing for use in hydroforming of automobile and truck components. This state-of-the-art tube manufacturing
facility in Jeffersonville, IN was completed in 2001, began ramping up production in the fourth quarter of 2001 and continues to increase its operating levels. The bulk of the tube production at the
new facility is dedicated to Dana Corporation, a major automotive parts supplier, which has built a new hydroforming plant near Elizabethtown, KY. On October 15, 2001, Bethlehem filed for
protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code and on February 6, 2003, sold substantially all of its assets, including its interest in the joint venture, to International
Steel Group, Inc., or ISG. In June 2003, we purchased ISG's 50% interest in the BethNova joint venture for $4,100,000 and renamed the now wholly-owned subsidiary Nova Tube Indiana, LLC.

In
November 2000, we built a new tubing facility, operated by Nova Tube and Steel, Inc. in Morrisville, PA. The structural tube mill, began production in
November 2000 and is capable of producing hollow structural sections (HSS) up to 6" × 6" × 3/8". The heavy gauge slitter and
cut-to-length line were completed in November 2001 and were in full production throughout 2002.

In
2002, through a subsidiary, we acquired all of the minority interest in Argo Steel Ltd. The acquisition was financed by internal sources of funds.

During
2002, the premises leased by Nova Tube Ontario Inc. in Mississauga, Ontario were expanded by 40,000 square feet. This enabled us to install additional equipment costing
approximately $400,000 which was financed by internal sources of funds. We plan to make further equipment upgrades at this facility which will also be financed by internal sources of funds.

At the end of 2004, we completed the construction of a 160,000 square foot facility in LaSalle (Montréal), Québec. This new manufacturing and processing
facility includes an in-line temper mill and cut-to-length line and became operational in early 2005. This facility replaces our facility at Dorval

10

---



Québec and one of our facilities at Lachine, Québec. The mill includes a rotary shear for continuous operation and precision cut-to-length
tolerances, and is capable of leveling and temper-rolling 40 ton coils up to 1/2" thick by 72" wide. The temper mill is also capable of processing coils up to 80,000 minimum yield and
creating elongations of up to 3.0%. The mill and cut-to-length line join our previously announced 1/2" × 72" wide slitter that has been operating
since our second quarter of fiscal 2004. In addition to these new pieces of equipment, we have upgraded, rebuilt and transferred two existing lines, a 1/4" × 60" slitter and
a 1/4" × 72" cut-to-length line, to bring the total number of lines in the new LaSalle facility to four, with the result that the new facility has an
annual slitting and leveling capacity of over 400,000 tons. The cost of this project was approximately $20.2 million, which was financed by a combination of new debt for the land and building
and internal sources of funds.

The new facility in LaSalle was built to reorganize and restructure three of our facilities. While historically, all these three facilities processed and sold hot-rolled coil
and plate, now only the LaSalle facility will undertake these operations. The LaSalle facility will take the place of two of the previous three operating locations. We believe that by consolidating
the operations into one facility, we will see improved inventory management of hot-rolled products, and capacity increases, production improvements and reduced manpower requirements from
the new and upgraded equipment. Furthermore, since the new LaSalle facility is located next to our Delta Tube operation, we also expect that this will result in quicker transfer of slit coils to the
tube mill, less transport equipment with no weight restrictions or traffic concerns, and less freight out costs with pick-ups in adjacent buildings as opposed to distant points on the
Island of Montréal. We believe these operating efficiencies, new equipment, and administrative and logistical advantages will result in significant cost savings beginning in the second
quarter of 2005.

Business Overview

We are a well-established steel service center, processor, and tubing manufacturer. We operate from 11 locations in the Northeastern, Mid-Atlantic and Mid-Western
United States and from 12 locations in





the Canadian provinces of Québec and Ontario. Since inception, we have grown our business internally through identifying and capturing niche opportunities in steel manufacturing and
processing, and through selective acquisitions. This has enabled us to become a multi-facility, multi-process provider of value-added services in several processing and geographic niches. For example,
based on our knowledge of the industry, we believe that we are one of four producers in North America of hydroform quality tubing used by the automotive industry, and one of two independent picklers
in Canada. We have also recently installed a new in-line temper mill in our LaSalle, Québec facility, which we believe will make us the only independent provider of this high-precision
service in Canada.

We process and distribute carbon steel, stainless steel and aluminum products and operate as an intermediary between primary metal producers and the manufacturers that require processed
metal, often on a just-in-time delivery basis. We produce steel tubing in various sizes for use in the structural and automotive markets (including tubing used in hydroforming). We also produce roll
formed steel sections and manufacture heavy equipment parts and accessories. Our flat rolled processing capabilities include pickling, slitting, blanking, leveling, temper-rolling and
cutting-to-length to precise customer specifications. Additionally, we perform many of these processing services for customers who provide their own steel, referred to in the industry as toll
processing. For a detailed description of our steel processing services, see "Products and Services."

In
fiscal 2004, we had net sales of $768.6 million, operating income of $117.9 million and net income of $72.9 million. Since our initial public offering in 1997,
our total tons sold and processed have grown from 829,000 tons in 1997 to 1,815,000 tons in 2004 which represents a compound annual growth rate of 11.8% and our shareholders equity has grown from
$60.8 million in 1997 to $230.7 million in 2004, which represents a compound annual growth rate of 21.0%.

11

---



Since
our initial public offering in 1997, we have completed the five greenfield projects described below, each of which involved the acquisition of land, construction of facilities from
the ground up and installation of various machinery and equipment:



We
believe that these greenfield projects have allowed us to grow profitability by lowering our costs of production while expanding our value-added processing and manufacturing
capabilities. We plan to continue to grow internally by pursuing future greenfield projects as additional opportunities in our markets arise.

Our
business strategy is focused on profitable growth, higher margins and lower costs of production, providing value-added processing capabilities and expanding our range of services and
customer base.

We
intend to achieve our objectives by continuing to focus on:



12

---





We
believe that we have the following competitive strengths that will facilitate the implementation of our business strategy:



13

---





Products and Services

Our services include the following traditional service center processes:



Our
services also include higher value-added processes, which process and transform steel to specified lengths, widths and shapes pursuant to specific customer orders, including the
following:



In
addition, we have recently expanded our services to include temper-rolling. Temper-rolling is an in-line process that improves the surface finish and flatness of cut-to-length sheet
and plate and that eliminates coil memory or springback.

A
distinctive aspect of our company is our focus on pickling and tubing operations:



This
reduces the cost and the weight of a steel component. Our tubing operations are presently structured as follows:



Suppliers

We purchase flat rolled steel for processing from a number of North American and international primary steel producers in quantities that we believe are efficient
for such producers. We concentrate on developing relationships with high-quality North American integrated steel mills and mini-mills, as well as international primary steel producers and on becoming
a valued customer of such producers. We are a major customer of flat rolled coil for some of our principal suppliers but are not dependent on any one supplier. This enables us to maintain a continued
source of supply at what we believe are competitive prices. We believe the accessibility and proximity of our facilities to major steel producers,

14

---



together
with our strong balance sheet, will continue to be an important factor in our maintaining good relationships with them.

The
steel industry as a whole is cyclical, and at times pricing and availability can be volatile due to numerous factors beyond our control, including general, regional and international
economic conditions, production levels, competition, import duties and tariffs and currency exchange rates.

Sales and Marketing

Each of our sales and distribution operations maintains its own sales and marketing staff to serve the specific local needs of our customers. Our combined sales
force consists of 128 salaried inside and outside sales representatives of which 26 are commissioned representatives. Our sales efforts are focused primarily on direct customer contact. We believe
that management selling is essential to our sales and marketing success. Consequently our managers and product managers, as well as our president and our various vice presidents are all active in
external sales. We feel that our commitment to quality, service and just-in-time delivery has enhanced our ability to build and maintain strong customer relationships.

Customers and Distribution

In fiscal 2004, we processed steel for sale to approximately 7,000 customers. Our diversified customer and geographic base serves to reduce our exposure to
fluctuations in business and economic cycles in particular industries and regions. In fiscal 2004, our top 20 customers accounted for less than 25.1% of
total net sales and no single customer accounted for more than 4.0% of total net sales. Our major customers include automotive parts manufacturers and stampers, other steel service centers, general
fabricators and manufacturers of transportation equipment, material handling equipment, electrical components, appliances, storage tanks, railway cars, ship building material, construction and heavy
equipment and agricultural equipment. Our sales to automobile manufacturers and their suppliers combined with our sales to manufacturers supplying the automotive "after market" components and parts in
fiscal 2004 accounted for approximately 21.4% of total net sales and our sales to other steel service centers accounted for approximately 18.4% of total net sales.

Our
facilities are strategically located to serve our broad customer base, which is largely located in the Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic United States, as well as Central Canada. These
strategic locations allow us to operate an efficient delivery system capable of handling a high volume of short lead-time orders. We transport most of our products directly to customers via our own
fleet of trucks, through independent trucking firms and through a logistics company owned by one of our directors. See "Major Shareholders and Related Party TransactionsRelated Party
Transactions."

The
following table sets forth the net sales of our Canadian and U.S. affiliates for the past three fiscal years:

|                    |  | Nov. 27,
2004 |         | Nov. 29,
2003 |   | Nov. 30,
2002
|------------------- |  | ------------- | ------- | ------------- | - | -------------
|
|Canadian affiliates |  | $             | 419,532 |               | $ | 281,803      
|U.S. affiliates     |  |               | 349,095 |               |   | 225,264      
|                    |  |               |         |               |   |              
|                    |  | $             | 768,627 |               | $ | 507,067      
|                    |  |               |         |               |   |              

Due
to the impact of seasons and climate in the regions we predominantly serve, demand for certain of our products may fluctuate during the winter months.

15

---



Management Information Systems

We maintain management information systems, including bar coding systems, which monitor and allocate inventory among our operations. In particular, the inventory
system at American Steel provides information to all sales and management personnel on a real time basis which enables them to offer a wide range of products to their customers on a timely basis
without the need to maintain an inventory of the full product line at all locations. Further, our systems generally provide information with respect to the buying patterns of our customers. Most of
our systems have been developed specifically for the management of our particular operations, such as our processing and tubing operations. We have designed our systems to provide us with the ability
to adapt quickly to our customers' needs. We actively pursue opportunities to streamline the cost and time associated with customer and supplier communications, including electronic data interchange.
We are also constantly making improvements to our systems to ensure maximum efficiency, security and scalability for our future needs.

Quality Standards

Our quality control systems establish controls and procedures covering all aspects of our products from the time the material is ordered by us through its
receipt, production and shipment to our customers. These controls and procedures encompass periodic supplier audits, inspection criteria, traceability and certification. From time to time, we have
successfully undergone quality audits by certain of our larger customers. To date, ten of Nova's facilities and American Steel's Auburn, Massachusetts facility have obtained ISO 9002 certification, a
universal industrial quality control standard set by the International Organization for Standardization. Our remaining facilities are seeking ISO certification. Furthermore, three of our facilities
located in Ontario and our facility in Jeffersonville, Indiana have achieved certification under QS 9000, which is the quality standard established by and for the North American automotive industry.

We
provide a variety of processing services which have undergone considerable evolution in the area of quality assurance to meet the stringent demands of our customers, and in
particular, the Ontario automotive market. Nova and American Steel have established themselves as quality suppliers by consistently meeting the requirements of their respective customers' quality
control audits.

Competition

We compete with other regional and national steel service centers, single location service centers and, to a certain degree, primary steel producers and
intermediate steel processors on a regional basis. We have different competitors for each of our products and within each geographic region. We compete on the basis of price, product selection and
availability, customer service, quality and geographic proximity. Certain of our competitors have financial and operating resources in excess of our financial and operating resources.

Environmental

Our facilities are subject to comprehensive and frequently changing federal, state, provincial and local laws and regulations in the United States and Canada
relating to the protection of the environment, including those related to air emissions, wastewater discharges, treatment, storage and disposal of hazardous substances and other materials and wastes,
occupational health and safety, and in general, the emissions of pollutants into the environment.

We
believe that we are in material compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations. We do not anticipate any material expenditures to meet environmental requirements
and do not believe that continued compliance with such existing laws and regulations will have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial condition. However, we cannot predict the
environmental laws or regulations that may be enacted in the future or how existing or future laws and regulations will

16

---



be
administered or interpreted. Compliance with more stringent laws or regulations, as well as more vigorous enforcement policies of the regulatory agencies or stricter interpretations of existing
laws and regulations, may require additional expenditures by us which could vary substantially from those currently anticipated.

Our
subsidiary American Steel was named as one of 19 defendants in an action brought in October 2001 by two private parties under the Comprehensive Environmental Response
Compensation and Liability Act,or CERCLA, to recover costs incurred and to be incurred in connection with a waste disposal facility in Cumberland, RI,
which has been categorized as a Superfund site by federal authorities. The complaint was subsequently amended twice to add additional defendants, aggregating to a total of 57 defendants. The
plaintiffs claim that we are liable based upon alleged shipments to the site by American Steel, prior to its acquisition by us in 1996. The plaintiffs have identified over 100 potentially responsible
parties, or PRPs, and the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, has issued claim notice letters to 63 parties, some of which are defendants in the lawsuit. We also received, on or
about April 25, 2003, an EPA claim letter seeking reimbursement of costs incurred and to be incurred at the site. American Steel responded to the claim by denying liability for the site, but
was also working with other PRPs to evaluate its options for resolving the matter. The plaintiffs seek recovery of investigative expenses incurred and to be incurred, together with a declaration of
liability for all future remediation costs at the site. We do not believe it is currently possible to estimate our share, if any, of such investigative expenses or future remediation costs with
reasonable certainty. The defendants have formed a PRP committee (in which we are participating) to monitor the site investigation. We believe that we have meritorious defenses against the claims
raised in the action and we intend to defend our position vigorously should the litigation proceed. However, we cannot provide assurances that we will prevail should the litigation proceed and any
significant loss could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

Certain
of the facilities that we occupy have been in operation for many years and, over such time, we and the prior owners or operators of such properties may have generated and
disposed of wastes which are or may be considered hazardous. Accordingly, it is possible that additional environmental liabilities may arise in the future as a result of any such waste generation and
disposal.

Legal Proceedings

In addition to the claims mentioned in "Environmental" above, we are a party to various legal actions that we believe are ordinary in nature and
incidental to the operation of our business. In our opinion, the outcome of these additional proceedings are not likely to have a material adverse effect upon our business, results of operations or
financial condition.

17

---



Government Regulation

In addition to environmental laws and regulations our operations are governed by many other laws and regulations, including, without limitation, those relating to
workplace safety and employee health. In addition, our subsidiaries and affiliates own and lease trucks for transporting products at various facilities. The operation and maintenance of these vehicles
is governed by various safety regulations. We believe that we are in compliance with these laws and regulations in all material respects and we do not believe that continued compliance with such laws
and regulations will have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Organizational Structure

We are the holding company for two main operating groups: (i) our Canadian affiliates, consisting of Nova Steel Ltd. (which since January 1,
2005, includes the Metco Steel division), Nova Tube Inc., Cresswell Roll Forming Inc., Argo Steel Ltd., Nova Tube Ontario Inc., Nova Steel Processing Centre Ltd. and
Delta Tube and Company, Limited; and (ii) our U.S. affiliates, consisting of Integrated Steel Industries, Inc., a U.S. holding company, American Steel and Aluminum Corporation, Nova Tube
and Steel, Inc. and Nova Tube Indiana, LLC.

The following chart illustrates the organization of our operating subsidiaries and their country of organization:

GRAPHIC



18

---





Property, Plants and Equipment

The following chart describes each of our Canadian operations:

|Subsidiary/Location                                         |  |       |  |                                                                        |  |   |  | Description of Operations and Products                                                                                                 |  | Title                    
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------
|                                                           
|Nova Steel Ltd./LaSalle, Québec                             |  | 
   |  | 160,000 sq. ft
Temper mill                                             |  |  |  | Hot-rolled, hot-rolled pickled and oiled and tubing                                                                                    |  | Owned                    
|                                                            |  |      |  | Two cut-to-length lines                                                |  |   |  |                                                                                                                                        |  |                          
|                                                            |  |      |  | Two slitting lines                                                     |  |   |  |                                                                                                                                        |  |                          
|                                                           
|Nova Steel Ltd./Dorval, Québec                              |  | 

 |  | 75,500 sq. ft
Two slitting lines
Multi-blanking line                   |  |  |  | Hot-rolled, hot-rolled pickled and oiled and cold-rolled products and tubing                                                           |  | Leased to May 31, 2005*  
|                                                            |  |      |  | Three flat bar edging lines                                            |  |   |  |                                                                                                                                        |  |                          
|                                                           
|Nova Steel Ltd./Cambridge, Ontario                          |  | 
   |  | 49,100 sq. ft
Two slitting lines                                       |  |  |  | Hot-rolled, hot-rolled pickled and oiled, cold-rolled and coated slit coils                                                            |  | Leased to Nov. 30, 2009* 
|                                                           
|Delta Tube and Company, Limited/LaSalle, Québec (60% Owned) |  | 
   |  | 100,000 sq. ft
HSS tube mill, up to 5" × 5" × 1/4"                     |  |  |  | Toll rolling of HSS tubing for Nova and pipe for Ispat Sidbec Inc.                                                                     |  | Owned                    
|                                                           
|Nova Tube Inc./Baie d'Urfé, Québec                          |  | 

 |  | 47,100 sq. ft
Hot-rolled tube mill
Cold-rolled tube mill up to 3" O.D. |  |  |  | Toll rolling of tubing for Nova for the automotive and furniture industries, other manufacturers and the structural market             |  | Leased to May 31, 2008*  
|                                                           
|Nova Tube Ontario Inc./Mississauga, Ontario                 |  | 
   |  | 90,000 sq. ft
Cold-rolled tube mill up to 4" O.D.                      |  |  |  | High quality mechanical tubing targeting hydroformed automobile components and other automotive and general manufacturing applications |  | Leased to April 30, 2007*
|                                                           
|Nova Steel Processing Centre Ltd./Stoney Creek, Ontario     |  | 

 |  | 171,000 sq. ft
Pickling line
Two slitting lines                        |  |  |  | Pickling and slitting of coils on a toll rolling basis                                                                                 |  | Owned                    
|                                                           
|Argo Steel Ltd./Lachine, Québec                             |  | 

 |  | 53,000 sq. ft
Slitting line
Cut-to-length line                         |  |  |  | Hot-rolled, cold-rolled and galvanized products for general manufacturing applications                                                 |  | Leased to March 31, 2006 
|                                                            |  |      |  | Blanking line                                                          |  |   |  |                                                                                                                                        |  |                          
|                                                            |  |      |  | Shearing                                                               |  |   |  |                                                                                                                                        |  |                          
|                                                           

19

---



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|Argo Steel Ltd./Brampton, Ontario             
|                                              
|                                              
|Cresswell Roll Forming Inc./Granby, Québec    
|                                              
|                                              
|                                              
|                                              
|Cresswell Roll Forming Inc./St. Hubert, Québec
|                                              
|Cresswell Roll Forming Inc./Shawinigan, Québec
|                                              
|                                              

The following chart describes our two tubing facilities in the United States:

|Subsidiary/Location                       |  |     |  |                                                   |  |     |  | Description of Operations and Products                                                     |  | Title
|----------------------------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----
|                                         
|Nova Tube and Steel, Inc./Morrisville, PA |  | 
 |  | 163,300 sq. ft
HSS tube mill up to 6" × 6" × 3/8" |  | 
 |  | Hot-rolled HSS tubing up to 6" square
Hot-rolled sheet and plate coil                      |  | Owned
|                                          |  |    |  | Heavy gauge slitter                               |  |     |  |                                                                                            |  |      
|                                          |  |    |  | Heavy gauge cut-to-length line                    |  |     |  |                                                                                            |  |      
|                                         
|Nova Tube Indiana, LLC/Jeffersonville, IN |  | 
 |  | 108,000 sq. ft
Mechanical tube mill up to 7" O.D. |  |    |  | High quality mechanical tubing targeting hydroformed automobile and truck frame components |  | Owned
|                                         

20

---



The following chart describes each of our other nine operations in the United States:

|Subsidiary/Location           |  |         |  |                                                                                  |  |     |  | Description of Operations and Products                                                                                                                                                                    |  | Title
|----------------------------- |  | ------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----
|                             
|American Steel/Albany, NY     |  | 
     |  | 40,000 sq. ft
Shearing                                                           |  |    |  | Pipe and tubing, hot-rolled products and galvanized sheet                                                                                                                                                 |  | Owned
|                              |  |        |  | Bar sawing                                                                       |  |    |  | Stainless steel and aluminum                                                                                                                                                                              |  |      
|                              |  |         |  |                                                                                  |  |    |  | Tubing                                                                                                                                                                                                    |  |      
|                             
|American Steel/Ashland, VA    |  | 
     |  | 45,000 sq. ft
Shearing                                                           |  | 
 |  | All carbon steel products
Stainless steel and aluminum                                                                                                                                                    |  | Owned
|                              |  |        |  | Bar sawing                                                                       |  |    |  | Tubing                                                                                                                                                                                                    |  |      
|                             
|American Steel/Auburn, MA     |  | 


 |  | 105,000 sq. ft
Four slitting lines
Leveling and cut-to-length line
Blanking line |  | 
 |  | Leading supplier of cold-rolled, high carbon, strip steel in the Northeastern United States
Processing of cold-rolled, galvanized, aluminum and stainless coils to supply sheets for all of our divisions |  | Owned
|                              |  |         |  |                                                                                  |  |    |  | Processing of coated sheets, intermediate tempered sheets and bright finished materials                                                                                                                   |  |      
|                             
|American Steel/Cumberland, RI |  | 
     |  | 49,000 sq. ft
Shearing                                                           |  | 
 |  | Hot-rolled products, cold-rolled bars
Stainless steel and aluminum                                                                                                                                        |  | Owned
|                              |  |        |  | Bar sawing                                                                       |  |    |  | Tubing                                                                                                                                                                                                    |  |      
|                             
|American Steel/Harrisburg, PA |  | 

   |  | 104,000 sq. ft
Shearing
Bar sawing                                               |  |    |  | Full line of carbon products, particularly stainless steel and aluminum sheet                                                                                                                             |  | Owned
|                              |  |         |  |                                                                                  |  |    |  | Tubing                                                                                                                                                                                                    |  |      
|                             
|American Steel/Hartford, CT   |  | 

   |  | 36,000 sq. ft
Shearing
Bar sawing                                                |  |    |  | Cold finished carbon steel bars, cold-rolled, coated, stainless steel and aluminum sheet                                                                                                                  |  | Owned
|                              |  |         |  |                                                                                  |  |    |  | Tubing                                                                                                                                                                                                    |  |      
|                             
|American Steel/Norwood, MA    |  | 

   |  | 55,000 sq. ft
Shearing
Bar sawing                                                |  |    |  | Cold finished carbon steel bars, cold-rolled, hot-rolled, coated, stainless steel and aluminum sheet                                                                                                      |  | Owned
|                              |  |         |  |                                                                                  |  |    |  | Tubing                                                                                                                                                                                                    |  |      
|                             
|American Steel/Portland, ME   |  | 

   |  | 59,000 sq. ft
Shearing
Bar sawing                                                |  |    |  | Full line of products, including high strength, hot-rolled plates for the shipbuilding industry and stainless steel bar grating for corrosive pulp and paper and food processing industries               |  | Owned
|                             
|American Steel/Syracuse, NY   |  | 
     |  | 53,000 sq. ft
Shearing                                                           |  | 
 |  | Primarily hot-rolled products
Stainless steel and aluminum                                                                                                                                                |  | Owned
|                              |  |        |  | Bar sawing                                                                       |  |    |  | Tubing                                                                                                                                                                                                    |  |      
|                             

21

---



The lease of our facility located in Dorval, Québec expires on May 31, 2005. We plan to extend this lease. Substantially all
the assets of certain of our subsidiaries are subject to blanket liens for the benefit of certain lenders.

Each
of the above facilities is fully utilized.

ITEM 5 OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

You should read this discussion together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial information
included elsewhere in this annual report.

Overview

Our operations historically have been conducted under the management philosophy of D. Bryan Jones, our founder and chief executive officer. We were incorporated
on April 4, 1997 as part of a reorganization in order to consolidate the operations of American Steel and Aluminum Corporation, or American Steel, and Nova Steel Ltd., or Nova, under one
holding company.

Our
consolidated financial statements include the accounts and transactions of our U.S. affiliates and our Canadian affiliates at historical cost, except that all material intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated. All references to our fiscal years and to those of our subsidiaries and affiliates are to fiscal years ended on the last Saturday of November.

We sell products in Canada and the United States. All of our sales and payments are made in either Canadian dollars or U.S. dollars and we conduct our operations generally on the basis
of short-term orders. Our customers typically release orders on a just-in-time basis and generally use one week forecasts for placement of orders, which are subject
to frequent additions and cancellations. Because our firm orders are so variable and have such short lead times, backlog, in the traditional sense, at any point in time is not a meaningful indicator
of the trend in our overall business or our future performance. Our results of operations are affected by numerous external factors, such as general economic and political conditions, competition and
steel pricing and availability.

We have grown our business internally and through acquisitions to become a multi-facility, multi-process steel service center. We have achieved additional growth through developing
value-added services in processing and geographic niches. We are one of four producers in North America of hydroform quality tubing used by the automotive industry, and one of two independent picklers
in Canada. We also have recently installed a new in-line temper mill, which will make us the only independent provider of this high-precision service in Canada. We have been
profitable in each year since we commenced operations in 1979, except for a loss of less than $200,000 in 1990. Our total tons sold and processed and our shareholders' equity grew from 1997 to 2004 at
a compound annual growth rate of 11.8% and 21.0% respectively.

Through
our subsidiaries, we sell a broad range of products, many of which have different gross margins. Products that have undergone more value-added processing, as well as manufactured
products, generally have a higher gross margin. Toll processing generally results in lower selling prices per ton but higher gross margins as a percentage of net sales than direct sales. Accordingly,
our overall gross margin is affected by product mix and the amount of toll processing performed, as well as volatility in selling prices and material purchase costs. Net sales include direct sales and
toll processing revenues. Cost of goods sold includes raw material, freight-in and labor costs.

Our accounts receivable, as recorded on our balance sheet, typically reflect invoices which are dated within three months prior to, and which are unpaid at, the date of the balance
sheet. The amount of our accounts receivable as recorded on our balance sheet will therefore reflect the recent increasing or decreasing trends in selling prices as well as in sales volumes.
Similarly, our inventories, which we seek to turn as frequently as possible and which we report on a first-in first-out basis, will

22

---



reflect recent inventory replacement costs. As our inventory replacement costs increase or decrease, based on similar inventory volumes, our inventories as recorded on our balance sheet will increase
or decrease accordingly. As a result, we believe that the increases in our accounts receivable and our inventories at the end of fiscal 2004 compared with fiscal 2003 are largely a reflection of the
increases in our selling prices and in our steel replacement costs during the last quarter of fiscal 2004, in our closing inventory volumes compared with the last quarter of 2003. Our inventories at
the end of fiscal 2004 reflect the current pricing for steel, whereas net sales for the year reflect pricing through the full twelve-month period. Where there is a period during which steel prices
rise, as was the case through fiscal 2004, based on similar volumes, inventories will tend to increase at a greater rate than sales.

While the steel service center industry is largely a regional business, it can be affected by the broader industrial markets. Beginning in the last fiscal quarter of 2004 and continuing
into the first fiscal quarter of 2005, we have observed that North American steel prices, which had been at a premium to global steel prices throughout the first three fiscal quarters of 2004, have
come more in line with world steel prices. We have also seen some inventory corrections during this same period as a result of seasonal factors and relatively high service center inventories, which
have had the effect of reducing selling prices. We do not expect our results in fiscal 2005 to benefit as much from inventory valuation gains as they did in fiscal 2004, and do not currently believe
that the pricing levels during the second half of fiscal 2004 are fully sustainable beyond the particular economic climate of that period. However, based on discussions with our customers we believe
that there is currently continued strong demand in many manufacturing industries and as discussed further below, we believe it is unlikely that in the foreseeable future prices will return to the
levels that prevailed in years prior to 2004. See "Risk FactorsRisks Relating to our OperationsThe prices we pay for steel and raw materials, and the prices we are able to
charge our customers for our products, may fluctuate due to a number of factors beyond our control, which could adversely affect our operating results," and "Risk FactorsRisks Relating to
our OperationsOur business may be affected by the cyclicality of the industries that purchase our products. Reduced demand from one or more of these industries could result in lower
operating income and profitability."

In recent years, our steel suppliers have been significantly impacted by the shortage of raw materials resulting in unprecedented cost increases affecting scrap, coke, iron ore and
energy. At times, this affected the availability and prices of flat rolled carbon steel. Effective in January 2004, North American steel producers implemented raw material surcharges to offset
these costs at least until these shortages subside. More recently, due in part to the surcharges and a number of additional factors, including the strengthening of the general economy, the increased
consolidation of North American steel producers and the increasing demands for steel from the Asian markets, particularly China, there has been a sharp rise in the price we pay for raw material, which
on average increased through fiscal 2004 by approximately 65%.

As a result of the surcharges from the steel producers, which, we believe, were introduced to overcome contracted price commitments, and the general price increases for other purchases,
the pricing to all customers in our industry was increased by us and our competitors. As noted above, it is uncertain to what extent these increases in prices will be fully sustained. During most of
2004, the escalation in surcharges by the North American steel producers was predicated on the shortages of supply and rising prices of scrap, coke and iron ore among other raw materials. In recent
months, while the price of scrap has decreased, the price of iron ore has increased significantly. These opposing trends notwithstanding, it appears to us that the North American steel producing mills
are moving towards pricing levels that, although lower than experienced in 2004, are higher than in years prior to 2004. In fact, it appears to management that there is a trend among steel producers
to roll raw material surcharges into a new base pricing structure. In addition, in the past few years we have noticed a trend of consolidation of steel producers which we believe will continue in the
North American and global markets. For example, in the period from 2003 to 2005 five formerly-independent North

23

---



American steel suppliers merged into a single operating business. We believe that this type of consolidation will have the effect of stabilizing pricing in the industry. We also believe that China
will remain a net importer of flat rolled steel in the future and will continue to influence steel prices. Accordingly, we believe it is unlikely that in the foreseeable future prices will return to
the levels that prevailed during the years prior to 2004.

We operate as an intermediary between steel producers and our customers. As indicated above, increasing or decreasing trends in steel prices will impact our accounts receivable and
inventories, and thereby our working capital and liquidity. Our commitments for metal purchases are generally at prevailing market prices in effect at the time we place our orders. During periods of
increasing prices, we face increased working capital demands as we sell off lower priced inventory but must purchase steel at the increasing prices. Similarly, when prices are decreasing, we face the
challenge of selling the inventory that we acquired at a relatively higher cost, as we replace our inventory at the decreasing prices. We believe that funds available under our credit facilities
together with the funds from our operations will be sufficient to provide us with the liquidity necessary to fund our anticipated working capital requirements and capital expenditure requirements over
the next 12 months. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources."

Significant short-term increases in prices can, depending upon general economic conditions, have a dampening effect on demand. However, we do not believe that the price
increases that we implemented as a result of the surcharges being imposed by North American steel producers during fiscal 2004 caused an impact on the volume of sales. In the future, we may not be
able to pass on these surcharges and price increases to our customers. Certain of our customers paid the additional amounts related to the surcharges in 2004 under protest. If these and other
similarly situated customers were to assert claims that they are not obligated to pay the amounts related to the surcharges and ultimately prevailed on such claims, this could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition in one or more future reporting periods.

Selected Results of Operations

We have set forth in the following table for each of the periods presented certain statement of operations data expressed as a percentage of net sales.

|                                  |  | Years Ended |  
|--------------------------------- |  | ----------- | -
|
|Net sales                         |  | 100.0       | %
|Cost of sales                     |  | 70.7        |  
|                                  |  |             |  
|Gross margin                      |  | 29.3        |  
|Operating expenses                |  | 13.9        |  
|                                  |  |             |  
|Operating income                  |  | 15.4        |  
|Interest expense                  |  | 0.6         |  
|Share in income of joint ventures |  | (0.0        | )
|                                  |  |             |  
|Income before income taxes        |  | 14.8        |  
|Income taxes                      |  | 5.3         |  
|                                  |  |             |  
|Net income                        |  | 9.5         | %
|                                  |  |             |  

24

---



Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003

In fiscal 2004, our net sales increased by $261.5 million or 51.6% to $768.6 million compared with $507.1 million in fiscal 2003. During
fiscal 2004, the steel industry in general experienced significant price increases by the North American steel producers of approximately 104.8% over the course of our fiscal year arising from raw
material cost and supply factors which, in turn, also led to the introduction of surcharges. Accordingly, our average selling prices escalated throughout the year by 45.0% and were significantly
higher than in fiscal 2003. In addition, the change in the Canada/U.S. exchange rate on the conversion to U.S. dollars of the net sales of our Canadian subsidiaries in the consolidated financial
statements for fiscal 2004 had a positive impact of approximately 4.4% on our net sales which represents an amount of $34.2 million.

Furthermore,
our tons sold and processed increased by 9.1% to 1,815,000 tons in 2004 from 1,664,000 tons in fiscal 2003. Our tons sold and processed in 2004 includes 914,000 tons from
direct sales and 901,000 tons from toll processing, compared with 870,000 tons from direct sales and 794,000 tons from toll processing in fiscal 2003.

Our
gross margin increased from $106.2 million in fiscal 2003 to $225.1 million in fiscal 2004, and as a percentage of net sales from 21.0% in fiscal 2003 to 29.3% in
fiscal 2004. These increases are primarily attributable to the strong pricing conditions and improved economic environment in fiscal 2004 in contrast to the weak market conditions we experienced
through the first three quarters of fiscal 2003, as well as to our focus on regaining and improving our gross margin percentage.

Our operating costs as a percentage of net sales decreased to 13.9% of sales from 16.4% in fiscal 2003. The decrease in percentage was attributable to our higher net sales. In absolute
dollars our operating expenses increased by $24.0 million. This increase was attributable to the following: (i) the impact of the change in the Canada/U.S. exchange rate on the
conversion to U.S. dollars of the operating expenses of



our Canadian subsidiaries in the consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2004 in the amount of approximately $3.9 million; (ii) the consolidation for the full year of one of our
operations which was formerly consolidated for only five months in the amount of approximately $0.6 million; (iii) profit-related bonuses in the amount of approximately
$5.1 million; (iv) an increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts in the amount of approximately $1.7 million; (v) additional operating costs incurred through the
duration of the expansion projects in the LaSalle and Brampton facilities in the amount of approximately $2.3 million; and (vi) the increase in general overall operating costs arising
from additional plant and office staff, annual salary and wage increases, utility costs, and other variable costs resulting from a 9.1% growth in tons sold and processed in the amount of approximately
$10.4 million.

In fiscal 2004, our interest expense decreased by $0.2 million or 5.4% to $4.9 million compared with $5.1 million in fiscal 2003. Some of our interest rates were
impacted positively by reductions in interest rate premiums which resulted from improved covenant ratios. In addition, we reduced the overall interest bearing debt during fiscal 2004.

Our
effective income tax rate in fiscal 2004 was 35.6% of income before taxes compared to 29.1% in fiscal 2003. The increase is attributable in part to a reduction in the impact on our
effective income tax rate of the Canadian tax incentive for manufacturing and processing activities and to the unavailability of certain previously available U.S. tax credits.

25

---



Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002

In fiscal 2003, our tons sold and processed increased by 3.8% to 1,664,000 tons from 1,604,000 tons in fiscal 2002. Our tons sold and processed in fiscal 2003
included 870,000 tons from direct sales and 794,000 tons from toll processing, compared with 867,000 tons from direct sales and 737,000 tons from toll processing in 2002.

Our
net sales increased by approximately $41.6 million, or 8.9%, to $507.1 million in fiscal 2003, compared with $465.5 million in 2002. The increase was partly
attributable to higher processing volumes but also due to prices which, after moving downward through the first half of the year, trended upward through the second half.

Our
gross margin, as a percentage of net sales, decreased to 21.0% in fiscal 2003 from 24.5% in fiscal 2002. The decrease was attributable to weak market conditions prevailing in the
first half of fiscal 2003 caused by excess inventories throughout the industry.

Our
operating expenses, as a percentage of net sales, decreased to 16.5% of sales in fiscal 2003 from 17.1% in fiscal 2002. The decrease in percentage was mainly attributable to our
higher net sales. In absolute dollars, our operating expenses increased by $3.5 million. This increase was due mainly to increased operating levels in certain of our facilities and the
consolidation of one of our operations which was formerly accounted for on an equity basis.

Our
interest expense remained unchanged at $5.1 million. This was a result of the overall borrowings remaining at the same level as 2002.

Income
before income taxes decreased by $11.8 million, or 39.1%, to $18.4 million in fiscal 2003 from $30.2 million in fiscal 2002. This decrease was due mainly to
our lower gross margins.

Our
income taxes in fiscal 2003 were $5.3 million and represented 29.1% of our income before taxes, compared to $10.1 million representing 33.4% of our income before income
taxes in fiscal 2002.

Fiscal 2002 Compared to Fiscal 2001

In fiscal 2002, our tons sold and processed increased by 11.4% to 1,604,000 tons from 1,440,000 tons in fiscal 2001. Our tons sold and processed in fiscal 2002
include 867,000 tons from direct sales and 737,000 tons from toll processing, compared with 773,000 tons from direct sales and 667,000 tons from toll processing in fiscal 2001.

Net
sales increased by approximately $48.5 million, or 11.6%, to $465.5 million, compared with $417.0 million in fiscal 2001. The increase was mainly attributable to
our higher selling prices and higher volumes.

Gross
margin, as a percentage of our net sales, increased to 24.5% in fiscal 2002 from 22.8% in fiscal 2001. The increase was attributable to the rapid increase in our selling prices
during fiscal 2002, to the increase in the number of tons we processed for others and to our management of inventories.

Our
operating expenses, as a percentage of net sales, decreased to 17.1% of sales in fiscal 2002 from 18.4% in fiscal 2001. The decrease in percentage was mainly attributable to our
higher selling prices. In absolute dollars, our operating expenses increased by $3.0 million. This increase was due mainly to our increased operating levels.

Our
interest expense decreased by approximately $1.4 million, or 21.6%, to $5.1 million, compared to $6.5 million in fiscal 2001. This decrease was mainly due to the
lower level of our bank indebtedness.

26

---



Income
before income taxes and minority interest increased by $18.3 million, or 153.8%, to $30.2 million in fiscal 2002 from $11.9 million in fiscal 2001. This
increase was due mainly to our higher selling prices and our higher gross margins.

Our
income taxes in fiscal 2002 were $10.1 million and represented 33.4% of income before taxes and minority interest, compared to $3.9 million representing 32.8% of income
before income taxes and minority interest in fiscal 2001.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal capital requirement is to fund our growth, including greenfield projects, strategic acquisitions, the purchase and upgrading of processing
equipment, the construction of related facilities and additional working capital. Historically, we have used cash generated from operations and revolving credit borrowings under our credit facilities
to finance our working capital requirements. We have financed acquisitions and capital additions from the proceeds of long-term indebtedness under our credit facilities.

We
generated net cash from our operating activities for fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004 in the amounts of $13.2 million, $19.1 million and $17.8 million, respectively.
These variations are attributable mainly to fluctuations in our overall accounts receivable and inventory levels which reflected the then existing market conditions.

In
fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004 the amounts of net cash we used for investing activities were $16.5 million, $17.0 million and $3.3 million, respectively. During 2004,
the cash we used for investing activities consisted primarily of $9.1 million of capital expenditures in our LaSalle, Québec facility. From fiscal 2002 to date, we have made
significant investments in the facility at LaSalle as well as in equipment at St. Hubert, Québec and Stoney Creek, Ontario.

Our
net cash from (used for) financing activities for fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004 was $0.3 million, $0.1 million and ($14.9) million, respectively. These differences are
mainly due to fluctuations in our working capital items.

We believe that funds available under our credit facilities together with the funds from our operations will be sufficient to provide us with the liquidity necessary to fund our
anticipated working capital requirements and capital expenditure requirements over the next 24 months. Our capital requirements are subject to change as business conditions warrant and
opportunities arise. We anticipate spending approximately $16.0 million on certain projects in the current fiscal year to increase capacity at existing facilities. At this time however, we have
not committed to funding any such projects. In connection with our internal and external expansion strategies, we may from time to time seek additional funds to finance the development of new
facilities and major improvements and additions to processing equipment to respond to our customers' demands. We plan to refinance our U.S. revolving credit and term loan agreements in the normal
course when they become due in 2006. We expect to generate enough cash to repay all of our other long-term debt.

At
November 27, 2004, our revolving credit facilities consisted of the following:



27

---





There
are no cross collateralizations among the various Canadian credit facilities or between the Canadian credit facilities and the U.S. credit facility.

At
November 27, 2004, our long-term debt consisted of the following:



28

---





Our
obligations described in the above four bullet points rank on apari passubasis.

Our
credit facilities contain various restrictive covenants which require us to maintain minimum net worth levels, certain financial ratios and limitations on dividends and capital
expenditures. As at
November 27, 2004 we were in compliance with all such restrictive covenants. Our credit facilities restrict our ability to receive dividends and interest from our subsidiaries.

As
at November 27, 2004, we had $0.1 million outstanding under various letters of credit.

As at November 27, 2004, advances by Peter J. Ouimet, the president of Argo Steel Ltd., one of our Canadian subsidiaries, amounted to $0.7 million, bearing interest
at Royal Bank of Canada's prime rate, 4.25% as at November 27, 2004, plus a premium of 0.5%, without repayment terms.

The
following loans were repaid during fiscal 2004:



Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

As at and for the year ended November 27, 2004 we had no off-balance sheet arrangements that had or are reasonably likely to have a material current or
future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

A summary of the payments due under our debt and other contractual obligations as at November 27, 2004 is as follows:

|                                               |  | Payments due by period
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|
|
|Long-term debt                                 |  | $                     
|Interest payments on fixed rate long-term debt |  |                       
|Interest payments on variable rate debt(1)     |  |                       
|Operating leases                               |  |                       
|Purchase obligations                           |  |                       
|                                               |  |                       
|                                               |  | $                     
|                                               |  |                       

---

29

---



The amount of purchase obligations included in the above table reflects our estimate of steel on order, in production and unshipped and for which
we believe we would have an obligation to pay. Most of our purchase orders may be cancelled without penalty upon giving sufficient notice. In the normal course of business, we purchase approximately
$610.6 million of steel per year. We estimate no more than approximately $69.1 million of steel purchase orders were outstanding at November 27, 2004 in the form of firm purchase
orders.

Effects of Inflation

Inflation generally affects us by increasing the cost of personnel, processing equipment, purchased steel and borrowings under our credit facilities and other
indebtedness. We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our operating income over the last three fiscal years. However, inflation has had and could have a material effect on our
financing costs based on its impact on amounts borrowed, the prime rate and LIBOR.

Effects of Foreign Currency Fluctuations

Although our financial results are reported in U.S. dollars, some of our revenues are derived from sales made by Canadian subsidiaries into the United States,
which are denominated in U.S. dollars, and converted into Canadian dollars based upon the average monthly exchange rate at the time of sale. If we are not able to successfully hedge our currency
exposure, fluctuations in the rate of exchange between the Canadian dollar and the U.S. dollar could have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow. See
"Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk."

In addition, when we consolidate the financial statements of our Canadian subsidiaries' into such financial statements, they are translated from their functional currency, the Canadian
dollar, into the reporting currency, the U.S. dollar. Fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar could have materially reduce or increase our results of operations and assets and liabilities as
reported in our financial statements.

Hedging

We formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and the hedged items, as well as our risk-management objectives and strategies for undertaking
various hedge transactions. We formally assess, both at the hedge's inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting
changes in cash flows of the hedged items.

We
discontinue hedge accounting prospectively when (a) we determine that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of a hedged item,
(b) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, or (c) we determine that the designation of the derivative as a hedge instrument is no longer appropriate. In these
situations where hedge accounting is discontinued, the derivative will be carried at its fair value on the balance sheet, with changes in its fair value recognized in current-period earnings.

We
minimize the credit (or repayment) risk in derivative instruments by entering into transactions with reputable financial institutions and we do not hold derivative instruments for
trading purposes.

At November 27, 2004, one of our U.S. subsidiaries had an interest rate swap agreement to manage its exposure to interest rate risk as required under the terms of the term loan
agreement. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources." This swap possesses a term equal to the term of the debt, with a fixed pay rate and a receive rate indexed to rates paid on the debt.
This derivative was entered into concurrently with the issuance of the debt being hedged, at which date, it was designated as a cash flow hedge and its fair value was recognized on the balance sheet.
Changes in the fair value of this

30

---



derivative are reported as a separate component of shareholders' equity in accumulated other comprehensive income.

We
utilize forward contracts, from time to time, to hedge our exposure to Canadian dollar exchange rate fluctuations in connection with future sales and purchases denominated in U.S.
dollars. Forward
contracts are entered into with reputable financial institutions and we do not enter or hold foreign exchange forward contracts for trading purposes. There were no forward foreign exchange contracts
outstanding at November 27, 2004.

Changes in Accounting Policies

Effective November 30, 2003, we adopted FASB Interpretation, or FIN, 46,Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities. Variable interest entities are required to be consolidated by their primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is the party that absorbs a majority of the entity's
expected losses, receives a majority of its expected returns, or both. However, we have determined that we did not have investments in variable interest entities. Accordingly, FIN 46 did not have a
material initial impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements. The estimates and assumptions are based on our historical experience and past performance. Actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. On an
ongoing basis, we monitor and evaluate our estimates and assumptions. The following critical accounting policies reflect what we believe require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments:

Revenue recognition.Revenue from product sales is recognized when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the amount
is fixed or determinable, delivery of the product to the customer has occurred, there are no uncertainties surrounding product acceptance and collection of the amount is considered probable. Title to
the product generally passes and revenue is recognized upon delivery of the product at the customer's destination. Sales returns and allowances are treated as reductions to sales and are provided for
based on historical experience and current estimates.

We charge the customer for the complete product delivered to the customer's designated location and we do not charge separately for shipping and handling costs. Shipping and handling
costs are recorded under the "Delivery" caption on our consolidated statement of earnings and amounted to $19.5 million for the year ended November 27, 2004.

Goodwill.Following the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, goodwill is no longer amortized but its carrying value must be tested annually for impairment. For the purpose of
testing goodwill impairment, we and an independent appraiser perform a valuation analysis of the reporting unit annually. The most recent valuation report indicated
that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, including goodwill. Therefore no impairment loss had to be recognized in the November 27, 2004 consolidated financial
statements.

Allowance for doubtful accounts.We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the
inability of our customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, increases to the
allowance may be required.

Income taxes.The provision for income taxes is computed on the pretax income of the consolidated subsidiaries located within
each taxing jurisdiction based on the current tax law. Deferred

31

---



income taxes are provided, based upon currently enacted tax rates, for temporary differences in the recognition of assets and liabilities on the financial statements and for income tax purposes.

Deferred income taxes include the benefit of losses carried forward when it is reasonably likely that future profits will result. Should the opportunity to realize the benefit of these
losses expire, such amounts would result in additional deferred income tax expense.

No provision has been made for deferred income taxes that may result from future remittances of approximately $53.0 million of undistributed earnings of our U.S. subsidiaries as
at November 27, 2004. Under current Canadian tax law, we may repatriate undistributed earnings of such U.S. subsidiaries without any income tax effect. However, should we repatriate part or all
of the undistributed earnings of our U.S. subsidiaries, a 5% withholding tax would be assessable on that amount.

Derivatives.We have designated an interest rate swap agreement to manage our exposure to interest rate risk as a cash flow
hedge. Changes in fair value are reported as a separate component of shareholders' equity in accumulated other comprehensive income. We formally assess, both at the hedge's inception and on an ongoing
basis, whether the derivatives used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged items. Should this hedge cease to be highly effective, any changes in
fair value will be recognized in current period earnings.

Trend Information

During our current, as well as our previous quarter, we have seen steel prices in North America, which had been at a premium, realign with world steel prices.
While we have seen some inventory corrections
during this same period, we continue to receive reports of continued strong demand in many manufacturing industries which should bode well for steel demand and steel prices in 2005. That being said,
given the possible impact of interest rates, exchange rates as well as global events and economic factors on our markets it is difficult to accurately forecast future results. As such, it is not
certain that we will be able to maintain our present levels of sales and profitability. However, although we do not expect to experience the same inventory gains in 2005 as in 2004, we do expect
current market conditions to continue to produce strong results.

ITEM 6 DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

Directors and Senior Management

The following are the members of our board of directors and our executive officers:

|Name                             |  | Age |  | Positions(s) Held                                                     
|-------------------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|D. Bryan Jones(a)(b)             |  | 64  |  | Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|Christopher H. Pickwoad(b)       |  | 65  |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director        
|Robert D. Taberner               |  | 53  |  | Vice President and General ManagerNova Steel, Ontario                
|Stephen D. Shaw                  |  | 57  |  | President and Chief Operating OfficerAmerican Steel                  
|Scott B. Jones                   |  | 40  |  | Vice President, Secretary and Director                                
|Roger Daigneault                 |  | 48  |  | Vice President, Corporate Purchasing                                  
|Peter V. Balboni                 |  | 58  |  | Vice President, Finance and TreasurerAmerican Steel                  
|Michael L. Richards(c)           |  | 65  |  | Director                                                              
|John LeBoutillier, C.M.(a)(b)(c) |  | 60  |  | Director                                                              
|Alexander Adam(a)(c)             |  | 60  |  | Director                                                              

---

32

---



D. Bryan Joneshas over 43 years of experience in the selling, marketing and production of flat rolled products. In 1967, he and a
partner formed St. Laurent Steel, and he served for many years as its vice president and general manager until the time of its sale to a major North American steel service center. In 1979 he
incorporated Nova Steel Ltd. He has served as president and chief executive officer and as a director of Nova Steel Ltd., or Nova, since its founding. He has been our chairman of the
board, president and chief executive officer since April 4, 1997.

Christopher H. Pickwoadhas 24 years of experience in the steel industry and has been employed by us since 1982. Prior to 1982, he
was a partner of a firm of chartered accountants. Mr. Pickwoad has been our executive vice president, chief financial officer and a director on our board since April 4, 1997.

Robert D. Tabernerhas 25 years of sales and marketing experience in the Ontario flat rolled market. He has served as the vice
president and general manager of our Ontario facilities since 1992.

Stephen D. Shawhas 36 years of experience in the steel industry, the last 21 years of which were in steel distribution in
Canada and the United States. He joined us in August 1997.

Scott B. Joneshas 17 years of experience in the steel industry and has been employed by us since 1991. He has been a vice
president, secretary and a director on our board since April 4, 1997. He is the son of D. Bryan Jones.

Roger Daigneaulthas been employed by us since 1984. He was employed by Ispat Sidbec Inc. for eight years in sales and production
prior to joining us.

Peter V. Balbonijoined American Steel in 1975 and has served as its vice president, finance and treasurer since 1980.

Michael L. Richardshas been a director on our board since September 24, 1997. Mr. Richards is a senior partner in the law
firm of Stikeman Elliott LLP, Canadian counsel to the Company. He is also a director of Intertape Polymer Group Inc.

John LeBoutillier, C.M., has been a director on our board since September 24, 1997. Mr. LeBoutillier has been the chairman
of the board and president of Mazarin Inc. since January 2004. He is also chairman of the board of Roctest Ltd., and a director of Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial
Services Inc., Shermag Inc. and Asbestos Corporation Limited. From March 2000 to December 2003, Mr. LeBoutillier was a company director. From November 1996 to
March 2000, Mr. LeBoutillier was the president and chief executive officer of Iron Ore Company of Canada and prior to November 1996, he was the president and chief executive
officer of Ispat Sidbec Inc., the major steel supplier with which we own Delta Tube and Company, Limited.

Alexander Adamhas been a director on our board since April 1, 2003. Mr. Adam is also a director of Gennum Corporation and
serves on the advisory board of Thomson-Gordon Inc. From June 1996 to August 2002, Mr. Adam was the president and chief executive officer of Algoma Steel Inc. He
previously held executive positions at Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada Ltd. (TMMC) and Stelco Inc.

Management Compensation

During fiscal 2004, the aggregate compensation paid by us to the named executive officers as a group for services rendered by them to us totaled
$5.0 million. One of our executive officers receives, as a bonus, a certain percentage of pre-tax earnings of the operations that he manages, which percentage is determined by negotiation
between that officer and us. This bonus is included in the aggregate compensation disclosed in this paragraph.

33

---



Compensation of Directors

Our non-employee directors are remunerated for their services with an annual retainer fee and an attendance fee for each meeting of the board of directors or
meeting of a committee thereof attended. In fiscal 2004, we paid each of our non-employee directors an annual fee of $8,000, plus a fee of $1,500 for each board of directors meeting and each committee
meeting attended, except that the chairmen of committees of the board of directors were paid a fee of $3,000 for each meeting at which they acted as chair. In fiscal 2004, payments made by us to the
directors for their services as directors amounted to $0.1 million. We also reimbursed out-of-pocket expenses related to the directors' attendance at such meetings.

Board Practices

Our board of directors currently consists of six members. Our directors are elected in rotation so that at the first meeting of our shareholders for the election
of directors, one-third of the number of directors to be elected were elected to hold office until the first annual meeting of shareholders held after that meeting, one-third of the number of
directors to be elected were elected to hold office until the second annual meeting of our shareholders held after that meeting and the balance of the number of directors to be elected were elected to
hold office until the third annual meeting of shareholders held after that meeting. At each subsequent annual meeting, directors are elected to fill the positions of those directors whose term of
office has expired. Unless otherwise removed from the board, elected directors hold office until the third annual meeting after their election. A director whose term of office has expired may, if
qualified, be re-elected.

The
term of office of Scott B. Jones and Alexander Adam will expire at our next annual meeting of shareholders or at such other time as their successors are elected or appointed. The
term of office of D. Bryan Jones and John LeBoutillier will expire at our 2006 annual meeting of shareholders or at such other time as their successors are elected or appointed. The term of
office of Christopher H. Pickwoad and Michael L. Richards will expire at our 2007 annual meeting of shareholders or at such other time as their successors are elected or appointed.

We
do not have any service contracts with any directors providing for any benefits to them upon their termination of employment or term of office.

Board Committees

To date, our board of directors has established three committees:



34

---





Employees

As at November 27, 2004, we had approximately 1,104 employees, of whom 30.3% working at 11 of our 23 facilities are organized by the United Steelworkers, the
Teamsters, the Sheet Metal Workers and independent employees associations. As of March 3, 2005, the labor contract with the Sheet Metal Workers covering 31 employees at one of our
Lachine facilities was extended such that it will now expire on November 30, 2009. The labor contract with the United Steelworkers covering 49 employees at our Auburn and Cumberland facilities
will expire on June 30, 2005. Consistent with our practice of commencing renewal negotiations for our labor contracts approximately sixty days prior to expiration, this contract is currently
being renegotiated. We do not presently anticipate that any work stoppages will occur prior to renegotiation of this contract. The labor contract with the Teamsters covering 17 employees at our
Ashland facility expired on April 30, 2005. This agreement is currently being renegotiated. We believe that our relations with our employees are good, which is supported by our low rate of
employee turnover. We have not experienced a work stoppage by any of our unions or employee associations in over 20 years.

Our approximately 1,104 employees are categorized as follows: production and warehouse employees (67%), sales personnel (12%), truck drivers (7%) and administrative employees (14%).

Share Ownership

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the ownership of our common shares as of February 23, 2005 by (i) each of our
directors and executive officers and (ii) all directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons named below have the sole voting and investment power with
respect to the number of common shares set forth opposite their names.

|Names of Beneficial Owners                      |  | Number of Common Shares Beneficially Owned |     | Ownership Percentage |     
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------ | --- | -------------------- | ----
|D. Bryan Jones                                  |  | 6,263,290                                  | (a) | 64.0                 | %   
|Christopher H. Pickwoad                         |  | 161,213                                    |     | 1.7                  | %   
|Robert D. Taberner                              |  | 275,227                                    | (b) | 2.8                  | %(b)
|Stephen D. Shaw                                 |  | 259,148                                    | (b) | 2.7                  | %(b)
|Scott B. Jones                                  |  | 1,494,146                                  | (c) | 15.3                 | %   
|Roger Daigneault                                |  | 129,536                                    | (b) | 1.3                  | %(b)
|Michael L. Richards                             |  | 7,300                                      |     | *                    |     
|John LeBoutillier, C.M.                         |  | 10,300                                     |     | *                    |     
|Alexander Adam                                  |  | 1,000                                      |     | *                    |     
|All directors and executive officers as a group |  | 8,601,160                                  | (d) | 82.3                 | %(d)

---

Share Option Plan

The Novamerican Steel Inc. 1997 Share Option Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, or ISOs, as defined in Section 422 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the

35

---



Code,
nonqualified stock options, or NSOs, and other rights. We have reserved 1,500,000 common shares for issuance under our share option plan. Administration of our share option plan has been
assigned to the Compensation Committee, a committee consisting of two or more directors of the Company, a majority of whom are disinterested. The Compensation Committee has, subject to the terms of
our share option plan, the authority to grant awards under our share option plan, to construe and interpret our share option plan and to make all other determinations and take any and all actions
necessary or advisable for the administration of our share option plan.

Our
key employees, executive officers, directors and other individuals who render services of special importance to our or our subsidiaries' management, operation and development are
eligible to receive
awards under our share option plan, but only our employees are eligible to receive ISOs. Options will be exercisable during the period specified by the Compensation Committee in each option agreement
and will generally be exercisable in installments pursuant to a vesting schedule that is determined by the Compensation Committee. Notwithstanding the provisions of any option agreement, options may,
in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, become immediately exercisable in the event of a "change of control" (as defined in our share option plan) and in the event of certain mergers and
reorganizations. No option will remain exercisable later than ten years after the date of grant (or five years from the date of grant in the case of ISOs granted to holders of more than 10% of the
common shares).

The
exercise price for ISOs granted under our share option plan may be no less than the fair market value of the common shares on the date of grant (or 110% in the case of ISOs granted
to employees owning more than 10% of the common shares). The exercise price for NSOs and all other awards granted under our share option plan is set at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.

The
Compensation Committee may grant Stock Appreciation Rights, or SARs, to our share option plan participants as to such number of common shares and on such terms and conditions as it
may determine. SARs may be granted separately or in connection with ISOs or NSOs. Upon exercise of a SAR, the holder is entitled to receive payment equal to the excess of the fair market value on the
date of exercise of the number of common shares for which the SAR is exercised, over the exercise price for such common shares under a related option, or if there is no related option, over an amount
per common share stated in the written agreement setting forth the terms and conditions of the SAR.

On
September 24, 1997, options to purchase 750,000 common shares were granted to three of our executive officers at an exercise price of $14.00 per share. All of these options
have since vested, 86,089 of which have been exercised and the remaining 663,911 of which will, if unexercised, expire on September 24, 2007. Such options represent the only awards granted and
currently outstanding under our share option plan.

ITEM 7 MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Major Shareholders

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the ownership of the common shares as of February 23, 2005 (except as noted below) by
each person or entity known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of the common shares. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons named below have the sole voting and investment power with respect to
the number of common shares set

36

---



forth
opposite their names. None of these persons has different voting rights from any other holders of common shares.

|Names of Beneficial Owners             |  | Number of Common Shares Beneficially Owned |  | Ownership Percentage |  
|-------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------ |  | -------------------- | -
|D. Bryan Jones                         |  | 6,263,290(a)                               |  | 64.0                 | %
|Scott B. Jones                         |  | 1,494,146(b)                               |  | 15.3                 | %
|Fidelity Management & Research Company |  | 976,500(c)                                 |  | 10.0                 | %

---

We
believe that over 80% of our common shares are held in Canada and less than 20% of our common shares are held in the United States. We estimate that we have 13 holders of record in
Canada.

We
are not aware of any arrangements at this time, the result of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control.

Shareholder Protection Rights Plan

We previously maintained a shareholder protection rights plan entitling holders of common shares the right to purchase additional shares at a predetermined
exercise price upon the occurrence of specified events. This plan expired in September 2002 and it has not been subsequently renewed or reinstated.

Related Party Transactions

A Canadian corporation owned by Scott B. Jones, our vice president, secretary and one of our directors and the son of D. Bryan Jones, our chairman, president and
chief executive officer, owns four facilities located in Canada comprising a total of 261,700 square feet and leases them to us on a triple-net basis at an aggregate annual rent of approximately
$1.2 million. Another Canadian corporation 50% indirectly owned by Scott B. Jones and 50% indirectly owned by Peter J. Ouimet, president of Argo Steel Ltd., one of our Canadian
subsidiaries, owns a facility located in Canada comprising a total of 63,100 square feet and leases it to us on a triple-net basis at an aggregate annual rent of approximately $0.2 million.
Another Canadian corporation 50% indirectly owned by Scott B. Jones and 50% by a party unrelated to us owns a facility located in Canada comprising a total of 118,300 square feet and leases it to us
on a triple-net basis at an aggregate annual rent of approximately $0.4 million. All the facility leases expire at varying dates between May 31, 2005, and December 31, 2011, and
all but one are subject to one or two five-year renewal options. See "Information on the CompanyProperty, Plants and Equipment."

A Canadian corporation owned by Scott B. Jones owns 12 trailers which it leases to us at an annual aggregate rent of $0.1 million. This corporation also provided transportation
arrangements for us in an amount totaling $6.6 million during fiscal 2004.

At November 27, 2004, unsecured loans by D. Bryan Jones to us amounted to $0.9 million, bearing interest at Royal Bank of Canada's prime rate, 4.25% as at
November 27, 2004, plus a premium of 0.75%.

37

---



At November 27, 2004, unsecured advances by Peter J. Ouimet to us amounted to $0.7 million, bearing interest at Royal Bank of Canada's prime rate, 4.25%, plus a premium of
0.5%, without repayment terms.

Michael L. Richards has been one of our directors since September 24, 1997. Mr. Richards is a senior partner in the law firm of Stikeman Elliott LLP, our Canadian counsel.
For the fiscal year ended November 27, 2004, fees and expenses paid to Stikeman Elliot LLP amounted to approximately $0.4 million.

We have adopted a policy that all transactions with any of our directors or officers, or with any person or entity that beneficially owns or exercises control or direction over shares
carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to all of our shares, or any of their affiliates, shall be:



ITEM 10 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Certificate and Articles of Incorporation

We have been incorporated under, and are subject to the provisions of, the Canada Business Corporations Act, or the CBCA. Our Articles of Incorporation, or
Articles, do not restrict the type of business that we may carry on.

Common shares.Holders of common shares are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of
shareholders, except matters submitted to a vote of another class or series of shares. Holders of our common shares do not have cumulative voting rights. Holders of common shares are entitled to
receive such dividends, if any, as may be declared by our board of directors out of funds legally available therefore. Upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, the holders of common shares are
entitled to receive our assets. Holders of common shares have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights. The rights of the holders of common shares are subject to the rights of the
holders of any preferred shares which may, in the future, be issued. The outstanding common shares are fully paid and non-assessable.

Preferred shares.Our board of directors is authorized to issue preferred shares, in one or more series, and to fix the
rights, privileges, restrictions, conditions and limitations, and the number of shares constituting any series or the designations of such series, without further vote or action by the shareholders.
Because the terms of the preferred shares may be fixed by the board of directors without shareholder action, the preferred shares could, subject to regulatory policies, be issued quickly with terms
calculated to defeat an attempted takeover of our company or to make the removal of management more difficult. Under certain circumstances, this could have the effect of decreasing the market value of
our common shares. Any preferred shares, if issued, would rank senior to our common shares as to the distribution of our assets in the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of our company.
We have no present plans to issue any preferred shares.

Changes to the rights of shareholders.We may amend, by special resolution, our Articles to change the rights attached to our
common shares. A special resolution is a resolution passed by not less than two-thirds of the votes cast by shareholders who voted in respect of that resolution or signed by all the shareholders
entitled to vote on that resolution.

38

---



Shareholders' meetings.The annual meeting of shareholders shall be convened at such day in each year and at such time as our
board of directors may by resolution determine. Other meetings of the shareholders may be convened by order of our chairman of the board, president or a vice-president who is a director or by our
board of directors, to be held at such time and place as may be specified in such order. Shareholders holding between them not less than 5% of the outstanding shares may requisition a special meeting
of shareholders.

Quorum of shareholders.One person present and holding or representing by proxy at least one of our issued voting shares
shall be a quorum of any meeting of shareholders for the choice of a chairman of the meeting and for the adjournment of the meeting; for all other purposes a quorum for any meeting (unless a different
number of shareholders and/or a different number of shares are required to be represented by the CBCA or by the Articles or by any other by-law) shall be persons present being not less than two in
number and holding or representing by proxy at least twenty percent of the shares entitled to vote at such meeting. If a quorum is present at the opening of a meeting of the shareholders, the
shareholders present may proceed with business of the meeting, notwithstanding that a quorum is not present throughout the meeting. Where we have only one shareholder or only one holder of any class
or series of shares, the shareholder present in person or by proxy constitutes a meeting.

We
have received an exemption from Nasdaq's Quorum requirement of Rule 4350(f) "Qualitative Listing Requirements for Nasdaq National Market and Nasdaq Small Cap Market Issuers
Except for Limited Partnerships."

Voting rights of non-resident shareholders.Neither Canadian law nor our organizational documents restrict or prohibit the
right of non-resident or foreign shareholders to hold or exercise voting rights of our common shares. See "Exchange Controls".

Change in control.Our Articles could make the removal of incumbent officers and directors and the acquisition of our company
by means of a tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise, more difficult due to the fact that we have a staggered board of directors. See "Directors, Senior Management and EmployeesBoard
Practices". These provisions may encourage persons seeking to acquire control of our company to negotiate with us first.

Number of directors, residency requirement, vacancies and removal.The Articles provide that there shall be a minimum of
three directors and a maximum of 15 directors and that the board of directors shall be elected and shall retire in rotation. The exact number of directors is fixed by the board of directors, subject
to the requirement of the CBCA that we have a minimum of three directors, at least two of whom are not officers or employees. The CBCA provides that one quarter of the directors of a corporation must
be "resident Canadians," defined to include Canadian citizens and permanent residents ordinarily resident in Canada.

The
CBCA provides that a vacancy on the board of directors may be filled by a quorum of directors, except for a vacancy resulting from an increase in the number or minimum number of
directors or from a failure to elect the number or minimum number of directors required by the Articles.

The
directors of a CBCA corporation may be removed from office by a resolution passed by a majority of votes cast at a special meeting of the shareholders, subject to any applicable
class or cumulative voting rights.

39

---



Limitations on liability of officers and directors.The CBCA provides that a corporation may
indemnify, and our By-laws
provide that we shall indemnify, in each case except in respect of an action by or on our behalf or by or on the behalf of a body corporate of which we are or were a shareholder or creditor to procure
a judgment in its favor, an officer or a director, a former officer or director or a person who acts or acted at our request as a director or officer of a body corporate of which we are or were a
shareholder or creditor, and his heirs and legal representatives, against all costs, charges and expenses, including an amount paid to settle an action or satisfy a judgment, reasonably incurred by
him in respect of any civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding to which he is made a party by reason of his being or having been a director or officer of our company or such body
corporate, if he acted honestly and in good faith with a view to our best interests, and, in the case of a criminal or administrative action or proceeding that is enforced by a monetary penalty, he
had reasonable grounds for believing that his conduct was lawful.

Amendment of certain provisions of the Articles and, fundamental changes.In accordance with the provisions of the CBCA, an
amendment to our Articles (except in limited circumstances) and the merger, consolidation or dissolution of our company, such event being a fundamental change, will require the approval of not less
than two-thirds of the votes cast by the shareholders voting in person or by proxy at a special meeting of the shareholders. Our By-laws provide that one person present and holding or representing by
proxy at least one of our issued voting shares shall be a quorum of any meeting of the shareholders for the choice of a chairman of the meeting and for the adjournment of the meeting; for all other
purposes a quorum for any meeting (unless a different number of shareholders and/or a different number of shares are required to be represented by the CBCA or by our Articles or our By-laws) shall be
persons present being not less than two in number and holding or representing by proxy at least 20% of the shares entitled to vote at such meeting.

Material Contracts

There were no material contracts during the year.

Exchange Controls

There are currently no laws, decrees, regulations or other legislation in Canada that restricts the export or import of capital or that affects the remittance of
dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident holders of our securities other than withholding tax requirements. There is no limitation
imposed by Canadian law or by our articles of incorporation or our other organizational documents on the right of a non-resident of Canada to hold or vote our common shares, other than as provided in
the Investment Canada Act, as amended by the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Implementation Act (Canada) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement Implementation Act.

The
Investment Canada Act requires notification and, in certain cases, advance review and approval by the Government of Canada of the acquisition by a "Non-Canadian" of "control of a
Canadian business," all as defined in the Investment Canada Act. Generally, the threshold for review will be higher in monetary terms for a member of the WTO or NAFTA.

Taxation

Purchasers of our common shares should consult their own tax advisers with respect to their particular circumstances and with respect to the effects of state,
local or foreign (including Canadian) income tax laws to which they may be subject.

40

---



Canadian federal income tax consequences

The following summarizes the material Canadian federal income tax consequences relevant to an investment in our common shares by individuals and corporations who,
at all relevant times, are residents, or deemed residents, of the United States and are not residents, or deemed not residents, of Canada for the purposes of the Convention between Canada and the
United States of America with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital, as amended, hereinafter referred to as the Convention, who, at all relevant times, hold their common shares as capital property
and, at all relevant times, deal at arm's length with us for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada), hereinafter referred to as the Canadian Tax Act, and who do not use or hold and are not deemed
to use or hold such shares in connection with a business carried on through a permanent establishment or a fixed base in Canada, such individuals and corporations being hereinafter referred to as U.S.
Residents. Our common shares will generally be considered to be capital property to a U.S. Resident unless they are held as inventory in the course of carrying on a business or were acquired in a
transaction considered to be an adventure in the nature of trade. This summary is based upon the current provisions of the Canadian Tax Act, the regulations thereunder and the provisions of the
Convention as in effect on the date hereof. Other than specific proposals to amend the Canadian Tax Act and regulations thereunder publicly announced by the Minister of Finance of Canada, prior to the
date hereof, this summary does not take into account or anticipate any changes in law, whether by legislative or judicial action, nor does it take into account tax laws of any province or territory of
Canada or of any jurisdiction outside Canada.

This summary is of a general nature only and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any particular U.S. resident. Accordingly, U.S.
residents should consult with their own tax advisors for advice with respect to their own particular circumstances.

A U.S. Resident will not be subject to income tax in Canada on any capital gain realized on a disposition of our common shares, provided that such shares do not
constitute "taxable Canadian property" of the U.S. Resident at the time of the disposition for purposes of the Canadian Tax Act. So long as such shares are listed on a prescribed stock exchange (which
includes Nasdaq), such shares will not generally constitute taxable Canadian property of a U.S. Resident unless, at any time during the five-year period immediately preceding the disposition, the U.S.
Resident, persons with whom the U.S. Resident did not deal at arm's length, or any combination thereof, owned 25% or more of the issued shares of any series or class of our share capital. If such
shares are considered taxable Canadian property to a U.S. Resident, the Convention will generally exempt that U.S. Resident from tax under the Canadian Tax Act in respect of a disposition of such
shares provided the value of the shares issued by us is not derived principally from real property situated in Canada. A U.S. Resident who disposes of our common shares that are taxable Canadian
property will be required to fulfill the requirements of Section 116 of the Canadian Tax Act unless such shares are listed on a prescribed stock exchange (which includes Nasdaq) at the time of
the disposition.

Dividends
paid or credited on our common shares, or deemed to be paid or credited, to a U.S. Resident in respect of such shares will generally be subject to Canadian withholding tax on
the gross amount of such dividends. Currently, under the Convention, the rate of Canadian withholding tax which would apply on dividends paid by us to a U.S. Resident is (i) 5% with respect to
dividends paid if the beneficial owner of the dividends is a company which owns at least 10% of our voting shares, and (ii) 15% in all other cases.

U.S. federal income tax considerations

General.The following summarizes the material U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders of owning and disposing
of our common shares. The U.S. federal income tax discussion is based on (i) provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, hereinafter referred to as the Code, and U.S. Treasury
Regulations thereunder, existing, temporary, proposed, and administrative

41

---



and
judicial interpretations thereof, on the date hereof, and such authorities may be repealed, revoked, modified or subject to differing interpretations, possibly on a retroactive basis, so as to
result in United States federal income tax consequences different from those discussed below, (ii) provisions of the Convention as in effect on the date hereof, and (iii) in part,
representations made by us. A "U.S. Holder" is a beneficial owner of our common shares who or which is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (i) a citizen or resident of the United States,
including an alien individual who is a lawful permanent resident of the United States or who meets the substantial presence residency test under the U.S. federal income tax laws, (ii) a
corporation or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, that is created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any of the fifty states or the
District of Columbia, unless otherwise provided by Treasury regulations, (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source, or
(iv) a trust if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more United States persons have the authority to control
all substantial decisions of the trust, or electing trusts in existence on August 20, 1996 to the extent provided in Treasury regulations. If a partnership or other entity treated as a
partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds our common shares, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership.
Notwithstanding the foregoing definition, a holder's status as a U.S. Holder might be overridden under the provisions of an applicable tax treaty. A "Non-U.S. Holder" is a holder, other than an entity
classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, that is not a U.S. Holder. This summary is subject to any changes to U.S. law or practice occurring after the date hereof, possibly
with retroactive effect, including any change in applicable tax treaty provisions, or different interpretations. Furthermore, this discussion is limited to holders of our common shares who hold such
shares as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code.

This is not an exhaustive discussion of all possible tax considerations. In particular, it does not discuss estate and gift taxes, taxes imposed on us, and the
consequences for U.S. Holders subject to special tax rules, including U.S. expatriates, certain Non-U.S. Holders (such as controlled foreign corporations and passive foreign investment companies),
dealers in securities, partnerships, insurance companies, regulated investment companies, tax-exempt organizations, banking and financial institutions, persons subject to the alternative minimum tax,
persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, persons holding our common shares as part of a hedging, conversion or straddle transaction, persons who directly or indirectly or through
certain related persons own more than 10% of our capital or voting power and persons carrying on a trade or business in Canada through a permanent establishment or fixed base for the purpose of which
our common shares have been acquired or held. Because of these limitations, we recommend that prospective purchasers of our common shares in this offering consult their own tax advisors regarding all
the tax consequences particular to them of their ownership and disposition of such common shares.

Taxation of dividends.For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the gross amount of a distribution by us to U.S. Holders
(including any amounts of Canadian tax withheld) will be treated as dividend income to the extent paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for U.S. federal income tax
purposes). Dividends paid by us generally will be treated as foreign source dividend income and will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction generally available for United States
corporations under the Code. If a dividend is paid in Canadian dollars or other property, the amount includible in income will be the U.S. dollar value of the Canadian dollars or the fair market value
of the other property distributed, as determined on the date of distribution to a U.S. Holder or to a nominee, custodian or other agent of such U.S. Holder. A U.S. Holder will have a tax basis in such
Canadian dollars or other property for U.S. federal income tax purposes equal to their U.S. dollar value on the date of receipt. Any subsequent gain or loss in respect of such Canadian dollars arising
from exchange rate fluctuations will be ordinary income or loss. If a U.S. Holder has the option to receive a distribution either in cash or in the form of our common shares, and such U.S.

42

---



Holder
chooses to receive shares, hereinafter referred to as a Share Distribution, such U.S. Holder will be treated for purposes of the preceding sentences as having received a distribution to the
extent of the fair market value of such shares. To the extent that an amount received by a U.S. Holder exceeds the U.S. Holder's allocable share of our current and accumulated earning and profits,
such excess will be treated first as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder's basis in our common shares (thereby reducing the U.S. Holder's basis in such shares), and
thereafter any remaining distribution in excess of basis would constitute a taxable gain from the deemed sale or exchange of the U.S. Holder's shares. See "Tax on Sale" below. Subject to the
limitations set forth in the Code, U.S. Holders may elect to claim a foreign tax credit against their U.S. federal income tax liability for Canadian income tax withheld from dividends received in
respect of our common shares. For the purposes of the limitations on use of foreign tax credits, dividends received from us generally will be characterized as passive income and therefore any U.S. tax
imposed on these dividends cannot be offset by excess foreign tax credits that a U.S. Holder may have from foreign source income not qualifying as passive income. The rules relating to the
determination of the foreign tax credit are complex and U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors to determine whether and to what extent a credit would be available. U.S. Holders that do not
elect to claim a foreign tax credit may instead claim a deduction for Canadian tax withheld if no other foreign credit is claimed for that tax year.

Tax on sale.For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize gain or loss on any sale, exchange
or other disposition of our common shares (unless a specific non-recognition provision applies). Such gain or loss will be measured by the difference between the amount of cash (and the fair market
value of any other property) received and the U.S. Holder's tax basis in such shares. A U.S. Holder's tax basis in our common shares will generally equal the amount paid by such U.S. Holder for such
shares (or, in case of shares acquired by way of a Share Distribution, the amount included in income at the time of the Share Distribution). The gain or loss arising from a sale or exchange of our
common shares will be a long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder's holding period for such shares exceeds one year. In general, the gain from a sale or exchange of our common shares by a U.S.
Holder will be treated as United States source income. However, should any Canadian tax be imposed on the sale or other disposition of such shares by a U.S. Holder and the U.S. Holder is eligible for
the benefits of the Convention, an election may be available under the Code pursuant to which a U.S. Holder would, for purposes of computing the foreign tax credit limitation, be entitled to treat the
gains as foreign source income. Alternatively, the U.S. Holder may claim a deduction for the amount of Canadian tax withheld if no other foreign credit is claimed for that tax year.

Passive foreign investment company or controlled foreign corporation.A "passive foreign investment company," or PFIC, as to
any U.S. person, is defined as any foreign corporation at least 75% of whose consolidated gross income for the taxable year is passive income, or at least 50% of the value of whose consolidated assets
is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income at any time during such person's holding period for shares of such corporation. For this purpose, passive income
generally includes dividends, interest, royalties, rents, annuities and the excess of gains over losses from the disposition of assets which produce those types of income. We intend to conduct our
affairs so as to avoid our and our subsidiaries' classification as PFICs with respect to U.S. persons holding our common shares. However, if ever applied to us and any one of the above subsidiaries,
the PFIC rules could produce significant adverse tax consequences for a U.S. Holder, including taxation of disposition gains as ordinary income and the imposition of an interest charge on U.S. federal
income taxes deemed to have been deferred. We currently believe that neither we nor any of our subsidiaries is a controlled foreign person, "CFC." A corporation is a CFC if more than 50% of the shares
of the corporation, by vote or value, are owned, directly or indirectly (including shares owned through attribution), by "10% CFC Shareholders" (United States persons directly or indirectly owning at
least 10% of the total combined voting power of all shares of the corporation). We currently believe that neither we nor any of our subsidiaries is a CFC because U.S. citizens and residents, in the
aggregate, do not own more than 50% of our common shares (taking into account the effect of

43

---



applicable
constructive ownership rules). In general, each 10% CFC Shareholder in a CFC on the last day of the CFC's taxable year is required to include in its gross income for such taxable year its pro ratashare
of the CFC's earnings and profits for that year attributable to certain types of income or investments. Effective for the portion of a
holder's holding period that begins after December 31, 1997, in the case of a corporation that is both a CFC and a PFIC, 10% CFC Shareholders will be treated as shareholders of a CFC and not as
shareholders of a PFIC during the time that such persons are 10% CFC Shareholders.

Information reporting and backup withholding requirements with respect to U.S. Holders.We do not currently pay dividends. If
we did, and if we used a paying agent (such as a bank) in the United States, the paying agent would be required to report the dividends to U.S. Holders not otherwise exempt from reporting
requirements. Certain U.S. Holders may be subject to backup withholding at a 28% rate on dividends received on our common shares. This withholding generally applies only if such U.S. Holder
(i) fails to furnish a correct taxpayer identification number, or TIN, to the U.S. financial institution or any other person responsible for the payment of dividends on our common shares,
(ii) furnishes an incorrect TIN, (iii) is notified by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, of the U.S. Holder's failure to properly report payments of interest and dividends and
the IRS has notified us to begin withholding tax from the U.S. Holder's dividends, or (iv) fails, under certain circumstances, to provide a certified statement, signed under penalties of
perjury, that the TIN provided is correct and that the U.S. Holder is not subject to backup withholding rules.

Amounts
withheld under the backup withholding rules do not constitute a separate U.S. federal income tax. Rather, any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be refunded
or allowed as a credit against the U.S. Holder's U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided the required information or appropriate claim for refund is filed with the IRS.

United States state and local taxes.In addition to U.S. federal income taxes, U.S. Holders may be subject to United States
state and local taxes with respect to their common shares. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding such matters.

U.S. federal income tax consequences to Non-U.S. Holders.The following discussion summarizes the U.S. federal income tax
consequences of owning and disposing of our common shares by a holder of such shares that is a Non-U.S. Holder, is not engaged in the conduct of a trade or business in the United States and is not
present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year.

Distributions to Non-U.S. Holders.A Non-U.S. Holder would generally not be subject to U.S. income tax with respect to
distributions by us.

Tax on sale by Non-U.S. Holders.A Non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax in
respect of gain recognized on the disposition of shares.

Information reporting and backup withholding requirements with respect to Non-U.S. Holders.Currently, U.S. information
reporting requirements and backup withholding will not apply to dividends on our common shares paid to Non-U.S. Holders if the Non-U.S Holder files required information with the payor or qualifies for
certain other exemptions. As a general matter, information reporting and backup withholding requirements will not apply to a payment of the proceeds of a sale of such shares effected outside the
United States by a foreign office of a foreign broker. However, information reporting requirements (but not backup withholding) will apply to a payment of the proceeds of a sale effected outside the
United States through a "U.S. Broker," unless the broker has documentary evidence in its records that the shareholder is not a United States person and has no actual knowledge that such evidence is
false, or the Non-U.S. Holder otherwise establishes an exemption. For purposes of the preceding sentence, a U.S. Broker is a broker that (i) is a United States person, (ii) is a foreign
person that derives 50% or more of its gross income for certain periods from the conduct of a trade or

44

---



business
in the United States, (iii) is a CFC, or (iv) is a foreign partnership if it is carrying on a United States trade or business or if more than 50% of the profits or capital
interests in the partnership are owned by United States persons. Payment by a broker of the proceeds of a sale of our common shares effected inside the United States is subject to both backup
withholding and information reporting requirements unless the Non-U.S. Holder certifies under penalties of perjury that he or she is not a United States person and provides his or her name and address
or the Non-U.S. Holder otherwise establishes an exemption. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a Non-U.S. Holder will be allowed as a refund or a credit against
such Non-U.S. Holder's U.S. federal income tax, provided that the required information or appropriate claim for refund is furnished to the IRS.

THE FOREGOING DISCUSSION OF THE MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES AND CANADIAN INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE OWNERSHIP, SALE OR OTHER DISPOSITION OF
OUR COMMON SHARES BY U.S. HOLDERS IS NOT INTENDED TO BE, NOR SHOULD IT BE CONSTRUED TO BE, LEGAL OR TAX ADVICE TO ANY PARTICULAR U.S. RESIDENT. ACCORDINGLY, INVESTORS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR TAX
ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES AND CANADIAN INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE OWNERSHIP, SALE OR OTHER DISPOSITION OF OUR COMMON SHARES, INCLUDING THE APPLICATION AND
EFFECT OF THE LAWS OF ANY STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN OR OTHER TAX JURISDICTION, AS TAX CONSEQUENCES MAY VARY WITH RESPECT TO AN INDIVIDUAL'S PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES.

Documents on Display

Any documents referred to in this Annual Report may be inspected at our corporate office, 6001 Irwin Street, LaSalle, Québec, Canada
H8N 1A1, upon appointment during normal business hours.

ITEM 11 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Although our financial results are reported in U.S. dollars, a substantial portion of our revenues are received in, and our expenses are incurred in, Canadian
dollars. In determining our results of operations, we convert the sales made by Canadian subsidiaries into the United States, which are denominated in U.S. dollars, into Canadian dollars based upon
the average monthly exchange rate at the time of sale.

Exchange rate fluctuations are beyond our control and although we partially hedge our currency exposure, there can be no assurance that changes in the rate of exchange between the
Canadian dollar and the U.S. dollar will not adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flow.

We
are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and exchange rates. From time to time, and only upon approval by certain of our executive officers, we enter into financial
contracts in the ordinary course of business in order to hedge these exposures. We do not use financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

45

---



Interest rate risk.Our exposure to interest rate risk is as follows, indicated in thousands of U.S. dollars:

|                  |  |               |  | November 27, 2004 |       
|----------------- |  | ------------- |  | ----------------- | ------
|
|Bank indebtedness |  | Floating rate |  | $                 | 3,442 
|                  |  |               |  |                   |       
|Long-term debt    |  | Floating rate |  | $                 | 24,763
|                  |  | Fixed rate    |  |                   | 36,858
|                  |  |               |  |                   |       
|                  |  |               |  | $                 | 61,621
|                  |  |               |  |                   |       

|                             |  |   |        | November 27, 2004
|---------------------------- |  | - | ------ | -----------------
|
|Fair value of long-term debt |  | $ | 61,621 |                  
|                             |  |   |        |                  

A
37 basis point movement in the Canadian prime rate, the U.S. base rate or LIBOR would result in an approximate $0.1 million, annualized for the period ended November 27,
2004, increase or decrease in interest expense and cash flows. The modeling technique used was to apply to our debt, the difference between the actual interest rates at November 27, 2004 and
the what-if interest rates.

A variable to fixed interest rate swap agreement is used by one of our U.S. wholly-owned subsidiaries to hedge our exposure to interest rate risk related to a term credit agreement and
is accounted for using the accrual basis. We recognize amounts to be paid or received under the interest rate swap agreement as interest expense or income in the period in which they accrue.

Exchange rate risk.From time to time, we utilize forward exchange contracts to hedge our exposure to exchange rate
fluctuations in connection with future sales and purchases by certain of our Canadian subsidiaries, denominated in U.S. dollars. Forward exchange contracts are entered into with reputable financial
institutions. At November 27, 2004, November 29, 2003 and November 30, 2002, we had no forward foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding.

We estimate that a 13 cent movement in the value of the Canadian dollar would affect our net sales by approximately $41.8 million annually, based on our 2004 Canadian dollar net
sales, without giving effect to any hedging instruments. The modeling technique used was to determine the difference between the conversion of our net sales in Canadian dollars for the period ended
November 27, 2004 using the average exchange rate for the year and the what-if exchange rate. In 2004, the average exchange rate was $1.3090 Canadian. As of May 2, 2005 the exchange rate
was $1.2552 Canadian.

Commodity price risk.We do not use derivative commodity instruments to hedge our exposure to the impact of price
fluctuations on our principal raw materials.

46

---



ITEM 16C PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The following table sets forth the accountant fees and services for the past two fiscal years:

Nov. 27,
2004

Nov. 29,
2003(In thousands of U.S. dollars)Audit fees

$
448

$
377Audit-related fees


11


9Tax fees


151


123$
610

$
509


Audit-related fees include fees for the quarterly review of our consolidated financial statements. Tax fees include tax compliance services and tax advisory and planning services. It is
the policy of the Audit Committee to pre-approve all engagement fees and terms for audit and non-audit servives to be provided by its auditors. Management presents regular updates to the Audit
Committee of the services rendered by the auditors.

The auditors, the Audit Committee and management maintain regular and open communication in relation to the audits of our financial statements. There were no disagreements between the
auditors, the Audit Committee and management on matters affecting the audit of our financial statements.

47

---



ITEM 19 EXHIBITS

|Exhibit No. |  | Description of Exhibit                                                                                                                                               
|----------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1.1(a)      |  | Articles of incorporation.                                                                                                                                           
|1.2(a)      |  | By-laws.                                                                                                                                                             
|2.1(a)      |  | Specimen of Certificate representing Common Shares.                                                                                                                  
|4.1(b)      |  | 1997 Share Option Plan.                                                                                                                                              
|4.2(c)      |  | Formation and Operating Agreement, dated February 2, 2000, of BethNova Tube, LLC.                                                                                    
|4.3(d)      |  | Acquisition by 156499 Canada Inc. of the Minority Interest in Argo Steel Ltd.                                                                                        
|4.4(e)      |  | $40,000,000 Revolving Credit Facility dated April 6, 2001.                                                                                                           
|4.5(f)      |  | $53,000,000 Term Loan Facility dated April 6, 2001.                                                                                                                  
|4.6(g)      |  | Purchase Agreement dated June 30, 2003 between Novamerican Tube Holdings, Inc., as Purchaser and ISG Venture Inc., as Vendor.                                        
|8.1(h)      |  | Subsidiaries of the Company.                                                                                                                                         
|10.1(h)     |  | Consent of Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton.                                                                                                                            
|11.1(i)     |  | Code of Business Conduct and Ethics                                                                                                                                  
|12.1(h)     |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.                                                                  
|12.2(h)     |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.                                                                  
|12.3        |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for this Amendment No. 1.                                         
|12.4        |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for this Amendment No. 1.                                         
|13.1(h)     |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|13.2(h)     |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

---

48

---





SIGNATURES

The Registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to
sign this Amendment No. 1 on its behalf.

|                      |  |     | NOVAMERICAN STEEL INC.(Registrant)                                                                    
|--------------------- |  | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: April 29, 2005 |  | By: | /s/Christopher H. PickwoadChristopher H. Pickwoad Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

49

---



QuickLinks