alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-03-038 July 22, 2003 

 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov 

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING AT GLOBAL NUCLEAR FUEL - AMERICAS 

 JULY 31 TO DISCUSS PLANT’S REGULATORY SAFETY PERFORMANCE 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will hold a public meeting on Thursday, July 31 in

Wilmington, North Carolina, to discuss the agency’s latest review of safety performance at the Global

Nuclear Fuel-Americas plant. 

The Licensee Performance Review, which covers regulatory safety compliance at the plant for a

period from May 13, 2001 through May 17, 2003, indicates that the facility continues to operate safely

and adequately protects special nuclear material against theft and diversion. 

 Performance at the facility was evaluated by the NRC staff in five main areas: Safety

Operations, Safeguards, Radiological Controls, Facility Support and Special Topics. NRC officials

said, based upon the review and the plant’s demonstrated performance, the agency will maintain its

basic level of inspection. The agency will perform additional security inspections due to changes in

physical protection requirements.

 The meeting will begin at 10:30 a.m. at the plant site at 3901 Castle Hayne Road. The meeting

will be between company officials and the NRC, but members of the public and the press are welcome

to attend for purposes of observation. NRC officials will be available prior to the meeting’s close to

answer questions from interested observers.

 Interested persons may obtain a copy of the NRC’s letter concerning the review

from the NRC Office of Public Affairs at the email and/or street address listed at the top of this

announcement or by accessing the NRC web site at http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/index.html .

# #
#### Nathan I. Singer v. Bruner-Ritter, Inc.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.
-1-

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 Case No. 20-23230–CIV–CANNON\Otazo-Reyes

ANGELA MILNER, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v.

TERI GALARDI, 

Defendant.

 /

PLAINTIFF SHAKIR WILLIAMS AND 

 JOCELYN JOHNSON’S NOTICE OF APPEAL

 Notice is hereby given that Plaintiffs Shakir Williams and Jocelyn Johnson hereby appeal 

to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit from the Order denying their Rule 

59 motion to alter or amend the Court’s Order of dismissal entered onSeptember 21, 2021 [ECF 

119] and from the Order dismissing each above named Plaintiff from the case with prejudice as 

a sanction entered on September 9, 2021 [ECF 113]. 

 Respectfully submitted this 21st day of October, 2021.

/s/ Astrid E. Gabbe, Esq. 

FL Bar #635383

The Law Office of Astrid E. Gabbe, P.A.

P.O. Box 4216

Hollywood, FL, 33083

954-303-9882

Email: astridgabbe@gmail.com

Case 1:20-cv-23230-AMC Document 130 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/21/2021 Page 1 of 3
-2-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice 

of Appeal was served by the Clerk of the Court using the NextGen CM/ECF

filing system , on October 21, 2021, on all counsel or parties of record on the 

service list.

/s/ Astrid E. Gabbe, Esq.

FL Bar #635383

The Law Office of Astrid E. Gabbe, P.A.

P.O. Box 4216

Hollywood, FL,

33083 954-303-9882

Email: astridgabbe@gmail.com

Case 1:20-cv-23230-AMC Document 130 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/21/2021 Page 2 of 3
-3-

Case 1:20-cv-23230-AMC Document 130 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/21/2021 Page 3 of 3
<Page>

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective
Amendment No. 13 to the registration statement on Form N-4 (No. 33-71688) of our
report dated February 15, 2002, relating to the financial statements of First
Fortis Life Insurance Company, which appears in the Statement of Additional
Information constituting part of Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to such
registration statement. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our
report dated April 6, 2001, relating to the financial statements of First Fortis
Life Insurance Company Separate Account A, which appears in such Statement of
Additional Information. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Independent Public Accountants" in such Statement of Additional Information.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 21, 2003
Jonathan Taylor 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

JAN 1 4 2014 

Branch Chief, Transportation Planning Branch, 

California Air Resources Board 

1001 I Street 

Sacramento, California 95812 

Subject: Use of San Joaquin Valley Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicle Recession Adjustment 

Methodology 

Dear Mr. Taylor: 

I am responding to your letter of September 23, 2011, requesting U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency approval of a Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicle Recession Adjustment Methodology in the 

San Joaquin Valley, California. The methodology would apply to Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 

data for metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) when they use the EMF AC20 11 model for 

regional emissions analyses in transportation conformity determinations. 

After reviewing the technical documentation, and consulting with your staff, EPA Region 9 

approves the Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicle VMT Recession Adjustment Methodology as an 

acceptable method for adjusting VMT data. Our approval is limited to use of the methodology 

with EMFAC2011 and in the San Joaquin Valley nonattainment areas. We understand that the 

adjustment factors in the methodology are based on updated statewide diesel fuel usage and 

economic forecasts. However, ARB has only requested use of the methodology in the San 

Joaquin Valley nonattainment areas since these adjustments were incorporated into the area's 

2012 PM2.5 and 2013 ozone attainment demonstrations. We further understand EMFAC2011 is 

in the process of being updated and expect that update to incorporate updated fuel usage and 

economic forecasts and the updated vehicle fleet. Therefore we do not anticipate use of this 

methodology once EMF AC is updated and approved for use in California. 

If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at (415) 972-3851 or Karina 

O'Connor at (775) 434-8176. 

Sincerely, 

/} }f.h.--tJ ~1~L- Matthew Lakin 

Manager, Planning Office
### §3227. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) Native American programs

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 3221 of this title (not including subsection (k) of such section)—

(1) $46,082,000 for fiscal year 2015;

(2) $49,641,000 for fiscal year 2016;

(3) $50,671,000 for fiscal year 2017;

(4) $51,795,000 for fiscal year 2018;

(5) $53,013,000 for fiscal year 2019; and

(6) $54,137,000 for fiscal year 2020.

#### (b) Migrant and seasonal farmworker programs

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 3222 of this title—

(1) $81,896,000 for fiscal year 2015;

(2) $88,222,000 for fiscal year 2016;

(3) $90,052,000 for fiscal year 2017;

(4) $92,050,000 for fiscal year 2018;

(5) $94,214,000 for fiscal year 2019; and

(6) $96,211,000 for fiscal year 2020.

#### (c) Technical assistance

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 3223 of this title—

(1) $3,000,000 for fiscal year 2015;

(2) $3,232,000 for fiscal year 2016;

(3) $3,299,000 for fiscal year 2017;

(4) $3,372,000 for fiscal year 2018;

(5) $3,451,000 for fiscal year 2019; and

(6) $3,524,000 for fiscal year 2020.

#### (d) Evaluations and research

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 3224 of this title—

(1) $91,000,000 for fiscal year 2015;

(2) $98,029,000 for fiscal year 2016;

(3) $100,063,000 for fiscal year 2017;

(4) $102,282,000 for fiscal year 2018;

(5) $104,687,000 for fiscal year 2019; and

(6) $106,906,000 for fiscal year 2020.

#### (e) Assistance for veterans

If, as of July 22, 2014, any unobligated funds appropriated to carry out section 2913 of this title, as in effect on the day before July 22, 2014, remain available, the Secretary of Labor shall continue to use such funds to carry out such section, as in effect on such day, until all of such funds are expended.

#### (f) Assistance for eligible workers

If, as of July 22, 2014, any unobligated funds appropriated to carry out subsections (f) and (g) of section 2918 of this title, as in effect on the day before July 22, 2014, remain available, the Secretary of Labor shall continue to use such funds to carry out such subsections, as in effect on such day, until all of such funds are expended.

(Pub. L. 113–128, title I, §172, July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1585.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 2913 and 2918 of this title, referred to in subsecs. (e) and (f), were repealed by Pub. L. 113–128, title V, §511(a), July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1705, effective July 1, 2015.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as a note under section 3101 of this title.
§ 1639.5 Use of credit reporting agencies. ( a ) The Board may report delinquent debts to appropriate credit reporting agencies by providing the following information: ( 1 ) A statement that the debt is valid and is overdue;
( 2 ) The name, address, taxpayer identification number, and any other information necessary to establish the identity of the debtor;
( 3 ) The amount, status, and history of the debt; and
( 4 ) The program or pertinent activity under which the debt arose.
( b ) Before disclosing debt information to a credit reporting agency, the Board will: ( 1 ) Take reasonable action to locate the debtor if a current address is not available; and
( 2 ) If a current address is available, notify the debtor by certified mail, return receipt requested: ( i ) That a designated Board official has reviewed the claim and has determined that the claim is valid and over-due;
( ii ) That within 60 days the Board intends to disclose to a credit reporting agency the information authorized for disclosure by this section; and
( iii ) That the debtor can request an explanation of the claim, can dispute the information in the Board's records concerning the claim, and can file for an administrative review, waiver, or reconsideration of the claim, where applicable.
( c ) At the time debt information is submitted to a credit reporting agency, the Board will provide a written statement to the reporting agency that all required actions have been taken. In addition, the Board will, thereafter, ensure that the credit reporting agency is promptly informed of any substantive change in the conditions or amount of the debt, and promptly verify or correct information relevant to the claim.
( d ) If a debtor disputes the validity of the debt, the credit reporting agency will refer the matter to the appropriate Board official. The credit reporting agency will exclude the debt from its reports until the Board certifies in writing that the debt is valid.
#### Per HOFVANDER, Per T. Persson, Anneli Tallberg (deceased, by Lennart Hansson, Legal Representative), and Olle Wikstrom, Appellants, v. Richard G.F. VISSER, Evert Jacobsen, and Willem J. Feenstra, Appellees.

No. 02-1188.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 15, 2002.

ORDER

The appellant having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 11


                  MOTOR CARGO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                    PRO FORMA EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATION



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Year Ended December 31,
                                                   ------------------------------------------
                                                      1998             1997            1996
                                                   ----------      ----------      ----------
<S>                                                <C>             <C>             <C>       
Pro forma earnings available to
  common shareholders                              $5,788,861      $5,621,476      $3,596,891
                                                   ==========      ==========      ==========      

                                    Basis EPS
                                    ---------

Shares

   Common shares outstanding entire period          6,987,820       5,820,000       5,820,000

   Weighted-average common shares issued
     during period                                         --         118,602              --
                                                   ----------      ----------      ----------

   Weighted-average common shares outstanding
     during period - basic                          6,987,820       5,938,602       5,820,000
                                                   ==========      ==========      ==========

Pro forma earnings per common share - basic        $     0.83      $     0.95      $     0.62
                                                   ==========      ==========      ==========


                                   Diluted EPS
                                   -----------

Shares

   Weighted-average common shares outstanding
     during period - basic                          6,987,820       5,938,602       5,820,000

   Diluted effect of stock options                      4,000              --              --
                                                   ----------      ----------      ----------

   Weighted-average common shares outstanding
     during period - diluted                        6,991,820       5,938,602       5,820,000
                                                   ==========      ==========      ==========

Pro forma earnings per common share - diluted      $     0.83      $     0.95      $     0.62
                                                   ==========      ==========      ==========
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 730 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 730

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to remove the prohibition 
        on States and territories against lowering their taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 11, 2021

   Mr. Braun introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to remove the prohibition 
        on States and territories against lowering their taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Let States Cut Taxes Act''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTION OF USE OF CORONAVIRUS STATE FISCAL 
              RECOVERY FUNDS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 602(c) of the Social 
Security Act, as added by section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan Act 
of 2021, is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Further restriction on use of funds.--No State or 
        territory may use funds made available under this section for 
        deposit into any pension fund.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 602 of such Act is further 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (d)(2)(A), by striking ``, including, in 
        the case of a State or a territory, all modifications to the 
        State's or territory's tax revenue sources during the covered 
        period'';
            (2) in subsection (e), by striking ``such subsection,'' and 
        all that follows through the period and inserting ``such 
        subsection.''; and
            (3) in subsection (g)--
                    (A) by striking paragraph (1); and
                    (B) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (7) as 
                paragraphs (1) through (6), respectively.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of the American Rescue Plan Act 
of 2021.
                                 <all>
```
#### Garofano Construction Co., Inc., Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [180 Misc. 539.]
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 241 (Monday, December 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64571-64572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27230]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER19-526-000]


AC Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
AC Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an 
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is December 31, 2018.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet 
access

[[Page 64572]]

who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#edaba8bfaea28381848388be989d9d829f99ad8b889f8ec38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="21676473626e4f4d484f44725451514e535561474453420f464e57">[email protected]</span></a>. or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: December 11, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-27230 Filed 12-14-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
467 P.2d 997

#### The STATE of New Mexico ex rel. OIL TOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Inc., Petitioner, v. The Honorable Robert W. REIDY as The District Court of the Second Judicial District, and David W. King, as its Receiver, Respondents.

No. 9035.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

April 28, 1970.

Ordered that the writ of prohibition heretofore issued herein on April 2, 1970, be and the same is hereby quashed as having been improvidently issued.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOJO EJONGA-DEOGRACIAS, AKA 

JoJo Ejonga, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; et 

al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

No. 16-35512 

D.C. No. 3:15-cv-05784-RJB 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Robert J. Bryan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 8, 2017**

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Jojo Ejonga-Deogracias, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se from 

the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging 

deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-35512 

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). 

Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir. 2010). We vacate and remand. 

The district court properly dismissed Ejonga-Deogracias’s deliberate 

indifference claim against the Washington Department of Corrections because this 

claim is barred by the Eleventh Amendment. See Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 

1045 (9th Cir. 1989) (Eleventh Amendment immunity applies to state agencies, 

including the department of prisons). However, dismissal of the deliberate 

indifference claim without leave to amend was premature because it is not 

absolutely clear that the deficiencies in Ejonga-Deogracias’s complaint could not 

possibly be cured by amendment. See Lucas v. Dep’t of Corr., 66 F.3d 245, 248 

(9th Cir. 1995) (“Unless it is absolutely clear that no amendment can cure the 

defect . . . a pro se litigant is entitled to notice of the complaint's deficiencies and 

an opportunity to amend[.]”); Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1130 (9th Cir. 2000) 

(en banc) (setting forth standard of review). Accordingly, we vacate the judgment 

and remand for the district court to provide Ejonga-Deogracias an opportunity to 

file an amended complaint that names the correct defendants.

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

VACATED and REMANDED.