alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### William Rosenthal v. Abraham L. Kass.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### § 1206.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to prescribe the procedures by which the Board will conduct open meetings in accordance with the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b) (“the Act”).
§ 1215.26 Notices to debtor. The first written demand for payment must inform the debtor of the following: ( a ) The amount and nature of the debt;
( b ) The date payment is due, which will generally be 30 days from the date the notice was mailed;
( c ) The assessment of interest under § 1215.27 from the date the notice was mailed if payment is not received within the 30 days;
( d ) The right to dispute the debt;
( e ) The office, address and telephone number that the debtor should contact to discuss repayment and reconsideration of the debt; and
( f ) The sanctions available to the MSPB to collect a delinquent debt including, but not limited to, referral of the debt to a credit reporting agency, a private collection bureau, or the Department of Justice for litigation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         977,338
<SECURITIES>                                   504,256
<RECEIVABLES>                                  155,326
<ALLOWANCES>                                    75,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,379,444
<PP&E>                                       1,557,321
<DEPRECIATION>                                 676,246
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,902,734
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          416,727
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,150,000
<COMMON>                                           696
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,106,120
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,902,734
<SALES>                                         45,350
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,350
<CGS>                                          187,351
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  788,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (757,084)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (120,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (637,084)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (637,084)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
```

[House Report 110-768]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

110th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     110-768

======================================================================

 
      PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO SUSPEND THE RULES

                                _______
                                

   July 23, 2008.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. Welch of Vermont, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                      [To accompany H. Res. 1367]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 1367, by a record vote of 8 to 3, report the 
same to the House with the recommendation that the resolution 
be adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides that it shall be in order at any 
time on the legislative day of Thursday, July 24, 2008, for the 
Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules 
relating to the bill (H.R. 6578) to provide for the sale of 
light grade petroleum from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and 
its replacement with heavy grade petroleum.

                            COMMITTEE VOTES

    The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion 
to report, together with the names of those voting for and 
against, are printed below:

Rules Committee record vote No. 577

    Date: July 23, 2008.
    Measure: H. Res. __, providing for consideration of motions 
to suspend the rules.
    Motion by: Mr. Dreier.
    Summary of motion: To amend the rule so that the Speaker 
may also entertain motions to suspend the rules related to H.R. 
6566.
    Results: Defeated 3-7.
    Vote by Members: McGovern--Nay; Matsui--Nay; Cardoza--Nay; 
Castor--Nay; Arcuri--Nay; Sutton--Nay; Dreier--Yea; Hastings 
(WA)--Yea; Sessions--Yea; Slaughter--Nay.

Rules Committee record vote No. 578

    Date: July 23, 2008.
    Measure: H. Res. __, providing for consideration of motions 
to suspend the rules.
    Motion by: Ms. Matsui.
    Summary of motion: To report the rule.
    Results: Adopted 8-3.
    Vote by Members: McGovern--Yea; Hastings (FL)--Yea; 
Matsui--Yea; Cardoza--Yea; Castor--Yea; Arcuri--Yea; Sutton--
Yea; Dreier--Nay; Hastings (WA)--Nay; Sessions--Nay; 
Slaughter--Yea.

                                  

```
#### § 162.96 Remission of forfeitures and payment of fees, costs or interest.

When a person elects to petition for relief before, or in lieu of, filing a claim under § 162.94, any seizure subject to forfeiture under this subpart may be remitted or mitigated pursuant to the provisions of 19 U.S.C. 1618 or 31 U.S.C. 5321(c), as applicable. Any person who accepts a remission or mitigation decision will not be considered to have substantially prevailed in a civil forfeiture proceeding for purposes of collection of any fees, costs or interest from the Government.
### §95d. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 95d was editorially reclassified as section 5508 of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 2003N-0456]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing                               ( print page 62902)                            that a collection of information entitled “Requirements for Collection of Data Relating to the Prevention of Medical Gas Mixups at Health Care Facilities; Survey” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Nelson, Office of Management Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD  20857, 301-827-1482.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of June 24, 2004 (69 FR 35379), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0548.  The approval expires on March 31, 2006.  A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets*.                

Dated: October 22, 2004.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-24113 Filed 10-27-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23643]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).
    Title: Assessment of Foreign Defense Procurement Practices.
    Agency Form Number: N/A.
    OMB Approval Number: None.
    Type of Request: New collection.
    Burden: 450 hours.
    Average Time Per Response: 3 hours per response.
    Number of Respondents: 150 respondents.
    Needs and Uses: This survey of U.S. defense contractors is needed 
to obtain information on foreign defense procurement practices abroad.
    Affected Public: Individuals, businesses or other for-profit 
institutions.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer, 202-482-0266, 
Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, e-mail address, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e9ad889f808db6bb869a9d828c9ba986848bc78c8699c78e869f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="347055425d506b665b47405f5146745b59561a515b441a535b42">[email protected]</span></a>, or fax number, (202) 395-7285.

    Dated: October 18, 2004.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-23643 Filed 10-21-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §1019. Disposal of moneys from sales, bonuses, rentals, and royalties

#### (a) In general

Except with respect to lands in the State of Alaska, all monies received by the United States from sales, bonuses, rentals, and royalties under this chapter shall be paid into the Treasury of the United States. Of amounts deposited under this subsection, subject to the provisions of subsection (b) of section 191 of this title and section 1004(a)(2) of this title—

(1) 50 percent shall be paid to the State within the boundaries of which the leased lands or geothermal resources are or were located; and

(2) 25 percent shall be paid to the county within the boundaries of which the leased lands or geothermal resources are or were located.

#### (b) Use of payments

Amounts paid to a State or county under subsection (a) shall be used consistent with the terms of section 191 of this title.

(Pub. L. 91–581, §20, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1572; Pub. L. 100–443, §5(a), Sept. 22, 1988, 102 Stat. 1768; Pub. L. 103–66, title X, §10202(b), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 408; Pub. L. 109–58, title II, §224(b), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 663.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2005—Pub. L. 109–58 inserted section catchline and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Subject to the provisions of section 191(b) of this title, all moneys received from the sales, bonuses, royalties and rentals under the provisions of this chapter, including the payments referred to in section 1005(i) of this title, shall be disposed of in the same manner as such moneys received pursuant to section 191 of this title or pursuant to section 355 of this title, as the case may be."

1993—Pub. L. 103–66 substituted "Subject to the provisions of section 191(b) of this title, all moneys" for "All moneys".

1988—Pub. L. 100–443 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "All moneys received under this chapter from public lands under the jurisdiction of the Secretary shall be disposed of in the same manner as moneys received from the sale of public lands. Moneys received under this chapter from other lands shall be disposed of in the same manner as other receipts from such lands."
Summary of Meeting between A4A and ACI- NA

May 12, 2014

List of Attendees

Connie Bosma, EPA

Erika Farris, EPA

Bryan Rittenhouse, EPA

Mary Ellen Levine, EPA

Pete Ford, EPA

Paul Bangser, EPA

Eric Strassler, EPA

Jeff Longsworth, Barnes & Thornburg for ACI-NA

Chris Oswald, ACI-NA

Richard Davis, Beveridge & Diamond

Marianne Csaky, A4A

Summary of Meeting

During the meeting, ACI-NA and A4A discussed concerns about some of the non-numeric technologybased effluent limits in the proposed MSGP applicable to Sector S facilities, including:

 EPA’s use of the terms “appropriate”, “equivalent”, “minimize”, “practicable”, and “infeasible”

 Airport-specific factors, such as safety, space, operational constraints when meeting the effluent 

limits

 EPA’s implementation of language from the deicing effluent limitation guideline (ELG)

 Permitting responsibilities when there are multiple operators (i.e., an airport authority and 

multiple tenants)
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Chronic disease notes &reports**
 
SuDoc:HE 20.7617:
Item Number:0494-H-09 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000531301
 
1996:  Summer | Fall
1997:  Spring/Summer | Fall
1998:  Fall
1999:  Summer | Fall  | Winter
2000: Summer | Fall  | Winter
2001: Spring | Fall  | Winter
2002: Spring | Fall  | Winter
2003: Winter
2004: Fall  | Winter
2005: Winter | Dec
2007: June
2009: Feb
 
 
November 6, 2017
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
annual report of United Rentals, Inc. and United Rentals (North America), Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I,
William B. Plummer, Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    WILLIAM B. PLUMMERWilliam B. PlummerChief Financial Officer


February 3, 2010
**Exhibit
32.1**
 
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes
- Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PLM Equipment Growth & Income Fund
VII (the “Partnership”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, the President of the General Partner and of the
Partnership, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the
Report of the Partnership filed today fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.
 
 
 
 /s/
James A. Coyne
 James A.
Coyne
 President
of PLM Financial Services, Inc.
 May 10,
2005
§ 1201.26 Service of pleadings and response. ( a ) *Service* — ( 1 ) *Service by the Board.* The appropriate office of the Board will notify each party to the proceeding that a new appeal has been docketed and will attach to the initial order in the proceeding a certificate of service, consisting of a list of the parties to the proceeding or their designated representatives.
( 2 ) *Service by the parties.* The parties must serve on each other one copy of each pleading, as defined by § 1201.4(b), and all documents submitted with it, except for the appeal. They may do so by electronic filing in accordance with § 1201.14, postal mail, facsimile, or commercial or personal delivery. Documents and pleadings must be served on each party and each representative. A certificate of service stating how and when service was made must accompany each pleading. The parties and their representatives must notify the appropriate Board office and one another, in a pleading, of any changes in their address, telephone number, or email address.
( b ) *Submission of documents.* Pleadings and attachments filed via postal mail, facsimile, or commercial or personal delivery must be filed on 81 ⁄ 2-inch by 11-inch paper. This requirement enables the Board to comply with standards established for U.S. courts. Paper pleadings and attachments may not contain binders, folders, staples, paper clips, or notes adhered to pages. Such items will be removed and not included in the record, or the filing may be rejected. Documents may not be submitted on an electronic media storage device such as a Compact Disc (CD), Digital Video Disc (DVD), or flash drive. Parties are responsible for reviewing all pleadings to confirm legibility and to minimize the inclusion of nonrelevant personally identifiable information. Pleadings filed via e-Appeal must adhere to the formatting and filing requirements set forth in § 1201.14(h).
( c ) *Submission of audio and video evidence.* Audio and video evidence must be submitted according to the formatting and submission requirements set forth in policies posted to the MSPB's website.
[88 FR 67058, Sept. 29, 2023]
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-027 June 5, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH EXELON GENERATION COMPANY TO DISCUSS

PERFORMANCE AT PEACH BOTTOM NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Exelon Generation

Company on Tuesday, June 12, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual assessment of safety

performance at the Peach Bottom nuclear power plant.

The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. in

Room S1-1 of the Site Management Building at the plant, which is located on Lay Road in Delta, Pa.

(The four-story Site Management Building can be found close to the river in the publically accessible

portion of the site.) NRC officials will be available afterwards to answer questions.

The performance period to be discussed is April 2, 2000, to March 31, 2001. A letter sent from

the NRC Region I office to Exelon addresses plant performance during the period and will serve as the

basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr/peach_eoc2001.pdf

Current performance information for the Peach Bottom Unit 2 plant is available on the NRC web

site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/PB2/pb2_chart.html

Information for the Peach Bottom Unit 3 plant can be found at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/PB2/pb3chart.html

###
#### Roland J. KRAMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF HUMBOLT; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-16989.

D.C. No. CV-01-20396-JF.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 28, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Roland J. Kramer appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, *Resnick v. Hayes,*218 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.

Kramer contends that the district court erred by dismissing his claims based on the statute of limitations because his pursuit of administrative remedies tolled the limitations period. We do not reach this issue because it is raised for the first time on appeal. *See Delange v. Dutra Constr. Co., Inc.,*183 F.3d 916, 919 n. 3 (9th Cir. 1999) (per curiam). Despite being granted leave to amend, Kramer failed to amend his complaint to plead any facts justifying the tolling of the statute of limitations.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
§ 12.32 Honeybees and honeybee semen. ( a ) Honeybees from any country may be imported into the U.S. by the Department of Agriculture for experimental or scientific purposes. All other importations of honeybees are prohibited except those from a country which the Secretary of Agriculture has determined to be free of diseases dangerous to honeybees.
( b ) Honeybee semen may be imported into the U.S. only from countries determined by the Secretary of Agriculture to be free of undesirable honeybees, and which take adequate precautions to prevent the importation of undersirable honeybees and their semen.
( c ) The importation of honeybees and honeybee semen is governed by joint regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Treasury published in Treasury Decisions and the Federal Register from time to time.
[T.D. 85-3, 50 FR 1044, Jan. 9, 1985, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51253, Dec. 21, 1988]