alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §541d. Location of source materials by holders of coal leases

The holders of coal leases issued under the provision of the mineral leasing laws, including chapter 7 of this title, prior to August 11, 1955, or thereafter if based upon a prospecting permit issued prior to that date, upon the discovery during the term of such lease of valuable source material in any bed or deposit of lignite situated within the leased lands, shall have the exclusive right to locate such source material under the provisions of this chapter but the mining and disposal of such source material shall be subject to the operating provisions of the lease and to the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 [42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.]: Provided, That the provisions of this section shall not apply to coal prospecting, permits or leases on lands embraced within entered, granted or patented lands described in section 541c of this title.

(Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 795, §5, 69 Stat. 680.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Atomic Energy Act of 1954, referred to in text, is act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, as added by act Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 919, which is classified principally to chapter 23 (§2011 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2011 of Title 42 and Tables.
#### § 191.5 Guantanamo Bay, insular possessions, trust territories.

Guantanamo Bay Naval Station is considered foreign territory for drawback purposes and, accordingly, drawback may be permitted on articles shipped there. Drawback is not allowed, except on claims made under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1), on articles shipped to the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Wake Island, Midway Islands, Kingman Reef, Guam, Canton Island, Enderbury Island, Johnston Island, or Palmyra Island. Puerto Rico is not considered foreign territory for drawback purposes and, accordingly, drawback may not be permitted on articles shipped there from elsewhere in the customs territory of the United States.

[USCBP-2018-0029, 83 FR 65064, Dec. 18, 2018]
exv10w1



 


Exhibit 10.1



Section 906 Certification


By the


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




Each of Christopher Naughton, Chief Executive Officer, and David Ross Seaton, Chief
Financial Officer of Novogen Limited, a New South Wales corporation (the “Company”),
hereby certifies that:



	 	(1)	 	The Company’s periodic report on form 20-F for the period ended June
30, 2002 (the “Form 20-F”) fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and
	 
	 	(2)	 	The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



* * *



	 	 	 
	Chief Executive Officer	 	
Chief Financial Offer
	 
	/s/ Christopher Naughton

..................................................
	 	
/s/ David Seaton

..................................................
	 
	Christopher Naughton	 	
David Seaton
	 
	Date: December 17, 2002	 	
Date: December 17, 2002
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of USA Technologies, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), I, George R. Jensen, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ George R. Jensen, Jr.George R. Jensen, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Energy Homes, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 27, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Keith O. Holdbrooks, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Keith O. Holdbrooks
Keith O. Holdbrooks
Chief Executive Officer
November 8, 2002

21
§ 146.67 Transfer of merchandise for exportation. ( a ) *Direct exportation.* Any merchandise in a zone may be exported directly therefrom (without transfer into Customs territory) upon compliance with the procedures of paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Immediate exportation.* Each transfer of merchandise to the customs territory for exportation at the port where the zone is located will be made under an entry for immediate exportation filed in an in-bond application pursuant to part 18 of this chapter. The person making entry must furnish an export bond on CBP Form 301 containing the bond conditions provided for in § 113.63 of this chapter.
( c ) *Transportation and exportation.* Each transfer of merchandise to the customs territory for transportation to and exportation from a different port will be made under an entry for transportation and exportation in an in-bond application pursuant to part 18 of this chapter. The bonded carrier will be responsible for exportation of the merchandise in accordance with § 18.26 of this chapter.
( d ) *Textiles and textile products.* Textiles and textile products which have been changed as provided for in § 146.63(d) may be exported and returned to Customs territory for warehousing provided the entry for warehouse is endorsed by the port director to show that the merchandise may not be withdrawn for consumption.
( e ) *Merchandise produced or manufactured in a zone and returned to Customs territory after exportation.* Merchandise produced or manufactured in a zone and exported without having been transferred to Customs territory other than for exportation or for transportation and exportation will be subject, on its return to Customs territory, to the duties and taxes applicable to like articles of wholly foreign origin, unless it is conclusively established that it was produced or manufactured exclusively with the use of domestic merchandise. The identity of the domestic merchandise must have been maintained in accordance with the provisions of this part, in which case that merchandise will be subject to the provisions of Chapter 98, Subchapter I, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202).
[T.D. 86-16, 51 FR 5049, Feb. 11, 1986, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51263, Dec. 21, 1988; CBP Dec. 17-13, 82 FR 45407, Sept. 28, 2017]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,547
<ALLOWANCES>                                       313
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,223
<PP&E>                                           1,352
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,919
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,754
<BONDS>                                            259
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            63
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,956
<SALES>                                          7,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,897
<CGS>                                            3,259
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (1)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (15)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 497
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,144
<INCOME-TAX>                                        20
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,124
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       897
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15


</TABLE>
§ 1201.119 OPM petition for reconsideration. ( a ) *Criteria.* Under 5 U.S.C. 7703(d), the Director of the Office of Personnel Management may file a petition for reconsideration of a Board final decision if he or she determines: ( 1 ) That the Board erred in interpreting a civil service law, rule, or regulation affecting personnel management, and
( 2 ) That the Board's decision will have a substantial impact on a civil service law, rule, regulation, or policy directive.
( b ) *Time limit.* The Director must file the petition for reconsideration within 35 days after the date of service of the Board's final decision.
( c ) *Briefs.* After the petition is filed, the Board will make the official record relating to the petition for reconsideration available to the Director for review. The Director's brief in support of the petition for reconsideration must be filed within 20 days after the Board makes the record available for review. Any party's opposition to the petition for reconsideration must be filed within 25 days from the date of service of the Director's brief.
( d ) *Stays.* If the Director of OPM files a petition for reconsideration, he or she also may ask the Board to stay its final decision. An application for a stay, with a supporting memorandum, must be filed at the same time as the petition for reconsideration.
[54 FR 53504, Dec. 29, 1989. Redesignated at 59 FR 30864, June 16, 1994, as amended at 77 FR 62370, Oct. 12, 2012]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-60124

Summary Calendar

 

ELLA ARMSTRONG,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:97-CV-57-B

- - - - - - - - - -

April 30, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ella Armstrong appeals the district court’s judgment for the

Commissioner in his action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for

review of the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) decision denying

her request for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental

Security Income. We review the Commissioner’s decision to

determine whether the decision is supported by substantial evidence
No. 98-60124

-2-

in the record and whether the Commissioner applied the proper legal

standards in evaluating the evidence. Villa v. Sullivan, 895 F.2d

1019, 1021 (5th Cir. 1990).

Armstrong makes the following contentions: (1) the

Commissioner did not adequately consider “the severity and effects”

of her physical impairments on her residual functional capacity;

(2) the Commissioner did not properly evaluate her mental

impairments; (3) the ALJ failed to fulfill his duty by not ordering

a consultative neurological examination; and 4) the case should be

remanded because the transcript of the hearing before the ALJ

contains “repeated references to the inaudibility of [Armstrong’s]

testimony.” We have reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs,

and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the

judgment entered by the district court. See Armstrong v. Apfel,

No. 3:97CV57-B-B (N.D. Miss. Jan. 12, 1998). 

AFFIRMED.
#### § 112.23 Investigation of applicant.

The port director may refer the application for a cartman's or lighterman's license to the appropriate special agent in charge where investigation and report concerning the character, qualification, and experience of the applicant as well as the nature and fitness of the equipment to be used.
### §823a. Principal office in District of Columbia; proceedings held elsewhere

The principal office of the Commission shall be in the District of Columbia. Whenever the Commission deems that convenience of the public or the parties may be promoted, or delay or expense may be minimized, it may hold hearings or conduct other proceedings at any other place.

(Pub. L. 95–164, title III, §302(d), Nov. 9, 1977, 91 Stat. 1320.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of Pub. L. 95–164, known as the Federal Mine Safety and Health Amendments Act of 1977, and not as part of Pub. L. 91–173, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 742, known as the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 120 days after Nov. 9, 1977, see section 307 of Pub. L. 95–164, set out as an Effective Date of 1977 Amendment note under section 801 of this title.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0119 - Proposed License Amendment to Export Nuclear Grade Graphite to Various Countries for Non-Nuclear End Use (XMAT0400/02).

Accession Number: ML031900788

Date Released: Tuesday, July 29, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML031840546 - SECY-03-0119 - Proposed License Amendment to Export Nuclear Grade Graphite to Various Countries for Non-Nuclear End Use (XMAT0400/02). (3 page(s), 7/14/2003)
    - ML031900779 - SECY-03-0119-Attachment 1-Poco Graphite Application to Amend XMAT0400/01, Dated 1/23/2003. (2 page(s), 1/23/2003)
    - ML031900782 - SECY-03-0119-Attachment 1-XMAT0400, Amendment No. 01 Dated February 5, 2002. (2 page(s), 2/5/2002)
    - ML031900783 - SECY-03-0119-Attachment 2-DOS Ltr., Robin DeLaBarre to J D Lee, Execuitve Branch Views, Dated 06/03/03. (3 page(s), 6/3/2003)
    - ML031900784 - SECY-03-0119-Attachment 3-Poco Graphite Ltr. Amending the Application to Withdraw Russia, Dated 07/02/03. (1 page(s), 7/2/2003)
    - ML031900785 - SECY-03-0119-Attachment 4-Government of Singapore IDVC, Dated 02/10/03. (2 page(s), 2/10/2003)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

July 8, 2009

Before

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

No. 08-1416

LESLEY C. STEPHENS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CHARLES ERICKSON, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of

Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 06 C 0176

William J. Hibbler,

Judge.

O R D E R

The slip opinion issued in the above-entitled cause on June 30, 2009, is amended on

page 1 to reflect the decided date as June 30, 2009.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations as filed
as part of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           NOV-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                AUG-1-1998
<CASH>                                           4,596
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,484
<ALLOWANCES>                                       153
<INVENTORY>                                     79,166
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               128,666
<PP&E>                                         107,662
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 192,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,399
<BONDS>                                         26,883
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,324
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   192,992
<SALES>                                        192,968
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               195,295
<CGS>                                          147,484
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,129
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,125
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    77
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (24,856)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,409)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,447)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,058)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.30)
        

</TABLE>
§ 4.1164 Contents of application. Any person filing an application for review shall incorporate in that application regarding each claim for relief— ( a ) A statement of facts entitling that person to administrative relief;
( b ) A request for specific relief;
( c ) A copy of any notice or order sought to be reviewed;
( d ) A statement as to whether the person requests or waives the opportunity for an evidentiary hearing; and
( e ) Any other relevant information.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of CFO

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Gateway, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Gateway), does hereby certify that:



| | a) |  | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) of Gateway fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gateway.
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                                                         
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 6, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/    RODERICK M. SHERWOOD
III                                         
|                      |  |     |  | Roderick M. Sherwood III Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-056 May 12, 2004

NRC APPROVES TESTING OF FULL-SCALE RAIL CASK

FOR TRANSPORTATION OF SPENT FUEL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, preparing for a high-speed crash test of a cask used to

ship spent fuel by rail, has set test plans in motion by directing the NRC staff to commence the

purchase of a full-scale certified rail cask.

The current computer and scale-model tests provide reasonable scientific assurance NRCcertified casks can survive a transportation accident. NRC Chairman Nils J. Diaz said, “The full-scale

cask test will enhance public confidence about how demanding our requirements really are.” 

The Commission authorized the purchase of an NRC-certified rail cask currently being used, or

expected to be used. The Commission also directed its staff to develop a test protocol so that it will not

be necessary to conduct additional tests on other certified rail casks, because the tested cask will be

representative of those currently in use or expected to be used in the foreseeable future. 

The Commission ordered that the test include realistic scenarios (for example, involving a train

traveling 75 miles per hour) and include exposing the cask to a fire. Still to be determined are the

details of the proposed test and projected costs. 

The NRC held four public meetings in March of last year to obtain comments on both the

proposed test, known as the “Package Performance Study,” and the proposed protocols, discussed in a

February 2003 NRC report, “United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Package Performance

Study Test Protocols” (NUREG-1768). The meetings were in Rockville, Maryland; Las Vegas and

Pahrump, Nevada; and Rosemont, Illinois. 

The NRC establishes design standards for casks used to transport licensed spent fuel, and

reviews and certifies cask designs prior to their use. Part 71 of the Commission’s regulations contains

the cask standards. The Nuclear Waste Policy Act requires the Department of Energy to use casks

certified by the NRC if it transports spent fuel and high-level waste to a national high-level waste

repository, such as the one proposed by DOE at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. 

###