alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Delco
Remy International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas J. Snyder, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/    THOMAS J. SNYDER
|Thomas J. Snyder       
|President and          
|Chief Executive Officer







March 26, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Delco Remy International, Inc. and will be retained
by Delco Remy International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Edgar S. Appleby and Others v. Frank L. Polk, etc.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consentto the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-157200, No. 333-138440, No. 333-101347, No. 333-33026, and No. 333-79911) and Form S-8 (No. 333-156447, No. 333-101346, andNo. 333-75738) of Eastern Virginia Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 11, 2010 related to our audits of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, included in andincorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Eastern Virginia Bankshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009.
EXHIBIT
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jean Paul Roy,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
      as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the *Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*, that,
      to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the *Securities Exchange Act of 1934*;
                and





2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                for the periods presented.

















/s/
      Jean
      Paul Roy


------------------------








Jean
      Paul
      Roy


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


August
      14, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           44734
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 46734
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  296788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3490
<OTHER-SE>                                      293298
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    296788
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                200859
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    29036
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 171823
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             171823
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    171823
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Not presented, as all shares of common stock are held by a sole
shareholder.
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

                                                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

                                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States Code, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, the undersigned,  as Executive  Vice-President and Chief Operating Officer of
U.S. Can Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

1)       the  Company's  Form 10-Q  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       the information  contained in the Company's Form 10-Q fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the
         financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                                /s/ John L. Workman

                                                                John L. Workman
                                                                Chief Operating Officer
                                                                (Principal Executive Officer)

                                                                Dated: November 12, 2002
```
Exhibit 10(ooo)

AGREEMENT

The parties hereto agree that the vesting date with respect to the Restricted Stock Agreements9,612 Series
F shares, dated March 20, 2002, between United Rentals, Inc. and Michael Kneeland, and 625 Series K shares, dated July 16, 2002, between United Rentals, Inc. and Michael Kneeland is delayed from April 1, 2006 to May 1, 2006.

The foregoing is acknowledged and agreed to on this 30thday of March, 2006.



|                                             |  |                                                         |  |  |  |                         |  | 
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|UNITED RENTALS, INC., a Delaware corporation |  |                                                         |  | 
|                                             |  |                                                         | 
|By:                                          |  | /S/    WAYLAND R. HICKS                                 |  |  |  | /S/    MICHAEL
KNEELAND
|                                             |  | Name: Wayland R. Hicks Title:   Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Michael Kneeland
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-057 May 10, 2001

NRC SCHEDULES MAY 24 MEETING IN MESQUITE, NEVADA,

ON POSSIBLE YUCCA MOUNTAIN WASTE REPOSITORY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with local citizens May 24 in Mesquite, Nevada,

to provide an overview of its activities related to the possible future high-level radioactive waste

repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada.

The meeting will be held from 5:30 to 7 p.m. in the Mesquite City Hall, 10 East Mesquite Blvd.,

Council Chamber. NRC representatives will discuss the agency’s independent oversight function and

its role in regulating the transportation of high-level waste. They will also be available to answer

questions.

###
### §942. Miner benefit entitlement reports; penalty for failure or refusal to file

(a) The Secretary may by regulation require employers to file reports concerning miners who may be or are entitled to benefits under this part, including the date of commencement and cessation of benefits and the amount of such benefits. Any such report shall not be evidence of any fact stated therein in any proceeding relating to death or total disability due to pneumoconiosis of any miner to which such report relates.

(b) Any employer who fails or refuses to file any report required of such employer under this section shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $500 for each such failure or refusal.

(Pub. L. 91–173, title IV, §432, as added Pub. L. 95–239, §12(b), Mar. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 101.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Mar. 1, 1978, see section 20(a) of Pub. L. 95–239, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 901 of this title.
#### Herman Schatia v. Morris Mishel.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Aug
               SEP
				**DEC**Previous capture
               202007
               2008
				**2009****8 captures**
           20 Sep 08 - 11 Jan 10
   Close
       Help


| |                                                                                                                          
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Relative Three-Year Average Unemployment Rates in Appalachia, 2003-2005(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

|A three-year average unemployment rate is a measure of 
long-term structural unemployment. It is calculated by dividing the 
three-year sum of persons unemployed by the three-year sum of the 
civilian labor force. The percent of the U.S. average is computed by 
dividing the county unemployment rate by the national average and 
multiplying by 100. The map uses critical breaks such as the national 
average to organize the data into groups of common values.

Source and Methodology


      Downloadable filesPDF version of the map (331 KB)Excel file of supporting data for the map (76 KB) | This map shows the three-year average unemployment rate in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The Appalachian rates range from 51.2% to 226.0% of the U.S. average. The U.S. average is 5.5%. The Appalachian average is 5.6%. For a list of county data by state, see the downloadable Excel file.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

No. III-00-19 May 5, 2000

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC DISPATCHES AUGMENTED INSPECTION TEAM TO REVIEW

HAND RADIATION EXPOSURES AT MALLINCKRODT, INC.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has dispatched an Augmented Inspection Team (AIT) to

review the circumstances surrounding possible radiation exposures above NRC limits to several

workers at the Mallinckrodt, Inc. facility in Maryland Heights, Missouri.

The team is headed by a senior NRC manager and includes three senior NRC health physicists

and one inspector from the State of Missouri’s Department of Health. The inspection, which began

May 4, will last about a week.

One possible overexposure to a worker’s hand was reported to the NRC by the company on

April 13. Mallinckrodt is a major supplier of radioactive drugs that are used in research and routine

medical diagnosis and therapy.

The inspection team will gather information on radiation exposures to workers’ hands that are

believed to have occurred over the past several years. The potential overexposures involve both NRCregulated radioactive material -- molybdenum-99 and technetium-99m -- and state-regulated

radioactive material -- indium-111.

NRC inspectors have visited the Maryland Heights site several times following Mallinckrodts’

notification of the potential for an employee to have received a high radiation dose to the index finger

and thumb of the individual’s left hand. Further investigation and a mockup of the original event

resulted in an estimate that the maximum dose to the worker’s index finger and thumb would be 2,000

rem.

Mallinckrodt has identified two work areas at its facility where workers may have received

radiation exposures exceeding NRC limits because of their practices in handling radioactive materials.

These radiation exposures received by workers in these areas are being reviewed by the company and

by the NRC team.

NRC’s annual exposure limit to the hand of an occupational worker is 50 rems. For

comparison, the average person in the United States receives about 0.3 rems per year to the whole body

from natural background radiation. A rem is a standard unit of measurement for radiation absorbed by

the human body.

After the team inspection is completed, the inspectors will meet with company officials to
discuss their findings. This meeting will be open to public observation. The schedule and location of

the meeting will be announced later. The NRC team will issue a written report which will be available

to the public several weeks after the completion of the inspection.

#####
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Comparing Ground-Water Recharge Estimates Using Advanced Monitoring Techniques and Models (NUREG/CR-6836)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6836 (PDF - 3.38 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**July 2003**Date Published:**September 2003

**Prepared by:** D. Timlin, J. Starr Agricultural Research Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Beltsville Agricultural Research Center Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2350

R. Cady, T.J. Nicholson Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

T.J. Nicholson, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6363 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

Risk due to contaminant release and transport, as estimated by many multimedia environmental models, is highly sensitive to infiltration and ground-water recharge. Previous ARS-NRC studies developed methodologies, and showed the value of high-frequency monitoring of unsaturated zone water contents and piezometric levels to estimate infiltration and ground-water recharge. This study tested those methodologies through comparison of estimated ground-water recharge in a closed system using a highly monitored lysimeter (i.e., 14 by 20 by 3 meters). Specifically, near-continuous water content, water-table elevation, and meteorological data were collected to estimate infiltration and ground-water recharge and their attendant uncertainties. These highly-detailed monitoring data were evaluated to capture individual recharge-event characteristics (i.e., infiltration, drainage and evapotranspiration) and to estimate hydraulic parameters. Advanced monitoring techniques and models were used to compare hierarchical levels of information for assessing sensitivities and identifying uncertainty. The study included numerical simulations of ground-water recharge using the HYDRUS-2D code and the PNNL Water Balance model. The variation in input parameters and resulting recharge estimates derived from the different methods provide a framework for assessing uncertainty. Advanced monitoring instruments proved valuable in providing (1) an understanding of the soil water dynamics; (2) input for estimating hydraulic parameters for the various models, and (3) a realistic database for evaluating the modeling results. Comparison of results indicated that there was considerable variability of soil water dynamics in the near surface.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
#### § 1620.32 Employees who move to a NAF instrumentality on or after August 10, 1996.

Any employee who moves from a CSRS- or FERS-covered position to a NAF instrumentality on or after August 10, 1996, and who elects to continue to be covered by CSRS or FERS, will be eligible to contribute to the TSP as determined in accordance with 5 CFR part 1600.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov 

No. III-03-036 April 24, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC DISPATCHES INSPECTORS TO REVIEW COOK NUCLEAR PLANT SHUTDOWN

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will conduct a special inspection at the D. C. Cook

Nuclear Power Station to review the circumstances surrounding the shutdown of both reactors at the

site because of an influx of fish into the plant’s cooling water intake. The facility, operated by

American Electric Power Co., is near Bridgman, Michigan.

Early on Thursday, April 24, plant operators shut down both reactors at the site after an influx

of alewives reduced the flow of water into the plant’s cooling water intake in Lake Michigan. The

build up of the small fish damaged a portion of the screens which protect the intake and restricted the

flow.

Following the shutdown, adequate reactor cooling was maintained using the backup cooling

system. 

Fish debris was also drawn into the system which provides cooling for various plant safety

equipment, including the emergency diesel generators which provide backup electrical power for plant

systems if offsite power is lost.

Because of the deteriorating conditions, the plant staff declared an alert under its emergency

plan at 3:48 a.m., and notified appropriate local, state, and federal agencies. The alert is the second

lowest of four emergency classifications.

The two NRC resident inspectors responded to the plant to monitor the utility’s activities. The

NRC staffed its regional incident response center in Lisle, Illinois, to provide regulatory oversight to

the activities.

The utility is cleaning the fish buildup from the intake structure and from plant cooling system

components. Any necessary repairs will be made before the reactors are restarted.

A report of the NRC special inspection will be publicly available about 30 days after the

inspection is completed. It may be obtained from the NRC Region III Office of Public Affairs or on

the NRC’s web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html

# # #
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-64 June 4, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC PROPOSES $5,500 FINE AGAINST ALARON CORPORATION; ISSUES

DEMAND FOR INFORMATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a

$5,500 fine against Alaron Corporation, Wampum, Pennsylvania, for

a violation of NRC requirements concerning the storage of

radioactive waste.

In addition to the fine, the NRC also has issued a demand

for information, requiring Alaron to provide, under oath or

affirmation, a statement concerning its ability to comply with

NRC regulatory requirements in order for the Commission to

determine whether the company’s license should be modified,

suspended or revoked. Alaron holds an NRC license that allows

the company to process radioactive waste for disposal. .

NRC cited the company in April 1997 for having at least 15

waste packages stored on site for more than two years. This past

February , less than a year later, an NRC inspection found that

the number of waste packages in storage for more than two years

had grown to 83, including two packages that had been there the

year before.

In a letter transmitting the citation to the company, NRC

Region I Administrator Hubert J. Miller said, the NRC is

concerned that although the company knew it was not permitted to

store waste for more than two years, “you failed to dispose of

all of the waste that was the subject of the previous notice of

violation and failed to prevent recurrence of the violation.”

The violation is categorized as “Severity Level 3" because

of the significance the NRC places on willful violations of

requirements. (NRC’s enforcement policy has four severity

levels, with Level 1 being the most severe.) “Willful violations

are of concern,” Mr. Miller said, “because the NRC’s regulatory

programs are based on licensees and their employees acting with

integrity.”

At a predecisional enforcement conference to discuss the

apparent violation, the company described its corrective actions,
which the NRC staff considered prompt and comprehensive. Those

actions include disposing of all waste that would have been in

storage for two years by December 31 by the end of this month,

developing a tracking system to ensure that all waste is disposed

of within 18 months after it is received or generated, and a

commitment from its parent company to provide funding for

disposal if operating funds are not available.

Alaron has 30 days to respond to the notice of violation and

demand for information.

#