alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 208

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1577

[Report No. 108–100] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

Reported by Mr. DOMENICI, without amendment 

AN ACT

To designate the visitor center in Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument in Arizona as the ‘‘Kris Eggle Visitor 

Center’’, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

4 (a) FINDING.—Congress finds that in August 2002, 

5 Kris Eggle, a 28-year-old park ranger in Organ Pipe Cac6 tus National Monument, was murdered in the line of duty 

7 along the border between the United States and Mexico. 
2

HR 1577 RS 

1 (b) DEDICATION.—Congress dedicates the visitor 

2 center in Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument to Kris 

3 Eggle and to promoting awareness of the risks taken each 

4 day by all public land management law enforcement offi5 cers. 

6 (c) REDESIGNATION.—The visitor center in Organ 

7 Pipe Cactus National Monument in Arizona is hereby des8 ignated as the ‘‘Kris Eggle Visitor Center’’. 

9 (d) REFERENCE.—Any reference to the visitor center 

10 in Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument in Arizona, in 

11 any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other 

12 paper of the United States shall be considered to be a ref13 erence to the ‘‘Kris Eggle Visitor Center’’. 

14 (e) SIGNAGE.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 

15 post interpretive signs at the visitor center and at the 

16 trailhead of the Baker Mine-Milton Mine Loop that—

17 (1) describe the important role of public law en18 forcement officers in protecting park visitors; 

19 (2) refer to the tragic loss of Kris Eggle in un20 derscoring the importance of these officers; 

21 (3) refer to the dedication of the trail and the 

22 visitor center by Congress; and 

23 (4) include a copy of this Act and an image of 

24 Kris Eggle. 
3

HR 1577 RS 

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

3 as may be necessary to carry out this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk. 

By MARTHA C. MORRISON, 

Deputy Clerk. 
Calendar No. 208

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1577

[Report No. 108–100] 

AN ACT

To designate the visitor center in Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument in Arizona as the ‘‘Kris 

Eggle Visitor Center’’, and for other purposes. 

JULY 11, 2003

Reported without amendment
#### LINDAL CEDAR HOMES, INC., Plaintiff—Appellant, and Premier Home Design and Planning, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Kenneth WILKINSON, husband; Lori Wilkinson; Northwest Refrigeration and Hvac Contractors, Inc.; Earl Christian, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-35868.

D.C. No. CV-99-00067-WFN.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 7, 2002.

Decided May 14, 2002.

*508Before RYMER, MeKEOWN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Lindal Cedar Homes, Inc. and Premier Home Design and Planning, Inc. (Lindal) appeal from summary judgment entered in favor of Kenneth and Lori Wilkinson. We reverse.

The undisputed facts on the record before this court1 do not give rise to a nonexclusive implied license under *Effects*Associates, *Inc. v. Cohen,*908 F.2d 555, 558-59 (9th Cir.1990). The Wilkinsons did not ask Lindal to create a plan or design for them, and Lindal did not do so. Nor does the consideration raise a reasonable inference that Lindal intended for the Wilkinsons to copy the expression in any of its works. *Foad Consulting Group, Inc. v. Azzalino,*270 F.3d 821 (9th Cir.2001), does not suggest otherwise, for there is no extrinsic evidence, course of conduct, or custom and practice to consider on this record.

We decline to consider Lindal’s other theories for reversal or the Wilkinsons’ alternative grounds for affirmance, as they were not addressed by the district court and the record is not fully enough developed for appellate review. *Singleton v. Wulff*428 U.S. 106, 120-21, 96 S.Ct. 2868, 49 L.Ed.2d 826 (1976).

REVERSED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. We grant the Wilkinsons' motion to strike submissions made by Lindal on appeal that were not part of the summary judgment record before the district court.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ALFONSO MONROY-OLAGUE,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-73794

Agency No. A205-156-533

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 9, 2015** 

Before: WALLACE, RAWLINSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Jose Alfonso Monroy-Olague, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of

removal. We dismiss the petition for review. 

FILED

DEC 15 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary decision, pursuant

to 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f) (final paragraph), that Monroy-Olague lacked good moral

character. See Lopez-Castellanos v. Gonzales, 437 F.3d 848, 854 (9th Cir. 2006). 

Monroy-Olague’s contention challenging the IJ’s consideration of the equities in

his case does not constitute a colorable constitutional claim or question of law that

would invoke our jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D); see also Bazua-Cota

v. Gonzales, 466 F.3d 747, 748-49 (9th Cir. 2006) (while “[t]his court retains

jurisdiction over petitions for review that raise colorable constitutional claims or

questions of law,” a petitioner may not attack a discretionary decision simply by

phrasing his abuse of discretion challenge as a question of law).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

2 13-73794
**IMAGIN MOLECULAR CORPORATION**(Formerly Known As)Cipher Holding Corporation

|Exhibit 32.1
|------------



CERTIFICATION THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Corey Conn, Chief Executive Officer of Imagin Molecular
          Corporation (the "Company"), certify, that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the annual report on Form 10-KSB/A
          for the period ended December 31, 2005 of the Company (the "Report"):

1.   The report fully complies with the requirements
          of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 20, 2006

|/s/ Corey ConnCorey Conn
                                        Chief Executive Officer, Director
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 149 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 149

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny any deduction for 
        direct-to-consumer advertisements of prescription drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

Mr. Nadler (for himself and Mr. Crowley) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny any deduction for 
        direct-to-consumer advertisements of prescription drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Say No to Drug Ads Act''.

SEC. 2. DISALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION FOR DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISEMENT 
              OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.

    (a) General Rule.--Part IX of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to items not deductible) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 280I. DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISEMENT OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.

    ``No deduction shall be allowed under this chapter for any amount 
paid or incurred for a direct-to-consumer advertisement of a 
prescription drug.''
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for part IX of 
subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by adding at the end 
thereof the following new item:

                              ``Sec. 280I. Direct-to-consumer 
                                        advertisement of prescription 
                                        drugs.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts paid or incurred after December 31, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
### §6537. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–94, div. E, title II, §212(a)(3)(A), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2775

Section, Pub. L. 94–59, title I, §105, July 25, 1975, 89 Stat. 275, related to compensation of Assistants to Majority and Minority in Office of Secretary of Senate.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on the later of the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2020, or the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after Dec. 20, 2019, see section 212(c) of Pub. L. 116–94, set out as a note under section 282b of this title.

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 94–59, title I, §105, July 25, 1975, 89 Stat. 275, which provided that this section was effective July 1, 1975, was repealed by Pub. L. 116–94, div. E, title II, §212(a)(3)(A), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2775.
Exhibit 10.7




---



##### 



PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT
 THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT
 W I T N E S S E T H:
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 1.
    
    APPOINTMENT:
 1.1
    
    Global hereby retains CONSULTANT, upon the terms and condition hereinafter
set forth herein, as a non-exclusive advisor on Globals Latin American Advisory Board
(the Services).1.2
    
    CONSULTANT hereby accepts such appointment and agrees to diligently perform
the duties set forth in Article 2 of this Agreement.
 2.
    
    CONSULTANTS DUTIES:
 2.1
    
    Global entrusts the Consultant in a non-exclusive manner and the




---



##### 



17.3
    
    Special Audit RightsDuring the term of this Agreement and for a period of one (1) year thereafter. GLOBAL shall have
the right, at its expense, to audit the books and records of the CONSULTANT related to its
activities on behalf of or in connection with GLOBAL, including all charges made and services
performed by the CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement and all payments, whether in kind or in
cash, made by the CONSULTANT for or on behalf of GLOBAL.
 18.
    
    SPECIAL PROVISIONS
 18.1
    
    Further Assurances. Each Party agrees to do all acts and things and to make, execute and
deliver such written instruments, as shall from time to time be reasonably required to carry out
the terms and provisions of this Agreement.18.2
    
    Survival of Indemnity Obligations. Any and all indemnity obligations of either Party shall
survive any termination of this Agreement.
 19.
    
    NOTICES:Any and all notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be in writing and in the
English language. Notice shall be made by personal delivery, certified airmail (returned receipt
requested), or facsimile. Notice shall be made to the following:
 CONSULTANT:




---



##### 



Global Offshore Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.By:
    /s/ Sven Herbert Feldhaus MarquardName:
    Sven Herbert Feldhaus MarquardTitle:
    Country Manager for MexicoCONSULTANTBy:
    /s/ Eduardo Francisco Borja Ruy SanchezName:
    Eduardo Francisco Borja Ruy SanchezTitle:
    Sr. VP  Global Industries, Ltd.
#### § 220.4 Time for filing.

Petitions for duty suspensions and reductions and Commission disclosure forms must be filed not later than 60 days after the Commission publishes in the Federal Register and on its Web site a notice requesting members of the public to submit this information. The Commission will publish notice requesting such petitions and disclosure forms not later than October 15, 2016, and October 15, 2019.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 64878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27326]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--UHD Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 16, 2018, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), UHD Alliance, Inc. (``UHD 
Alliance'') filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Charter Communications, St. Louis, MO, has been added as 
a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and UHD Alliance intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On June 17, 2015, UHD Alliance filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on July 17, 2015 (80 FR 42537).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 6, 
2018. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on October 17, 2018 (83 FR 52557).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-27326 Filed 12-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 208 (Thursday, October 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24144]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2004-81]


Petitons for Exemption; Dispositions of Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of dispositions of prior petitions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: SUMMARY:
    Pursuant to FAA's rulemaking provisions governing the application, 
processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption, part 11 of 
Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this notice contains 
the dispositions of certain petitions previously received. The purpose 
of this notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and 
participation in, this aspect of FAA's regulatory activities. Neither 
publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information 
in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of any petition 
or its final disposition.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Annette Kovite, (425-227-1262), 
Transport Airplane Directorate (ANM-113), Federal Aviation 
Administration, 1601 Lind Ave SW., Renton, WA 98055-4056; or John 
Linsenmeyer (202-267-5174), Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal 
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 
20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91.

Issued in Washington, DC, on October 22, 2004.
    Dated: October 22, 2004.
Anthony F. Fazio,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Dispositions of Petitions

    Docket No.: FAA-2003-16211.
    Petitioner: AvCraft Aerospace GmbH.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 25.1309(c).
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit operators of 
the Dornier Model 328-300 aircraft to use Reduced Thrust Takeoff 
Operations (RTTO) with an indication system that exhibits certain 
inconsistent flight phase indications in the event of an engine failure 
below 1000 ft.

Time Limited Partial Grant of Exemption, 02/04/2004, Exemption No. 8237

[FR Doc. 04-24144 Filed 10-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Planet Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Scott L. Glenn as Chief Executive Officer and Leslie White as Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  August 3, 2005


/s/ Scott Glenn

-----------------------------------------------------
Scott L. Glenn
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Leslie White

-----------------------------------------------------
Leslie White
Chief Financial Officer
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before February 12, 2019.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated to the Assistant Administrator of the DEA Diversion Control Division (“Assistant Administrator”) pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R. In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on October 31, 2018, Usona Institute, 2800 Woods Hollow Road, Madison, Wisconsin 53711 applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Controlled substance
Drug code
Schedule5-Methoxy-N-N-dimethyltryptamine
7431
IDimethyltryptamine
7435
I
 The institute plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances synthetically in bulk for use in institute-sponsored research. Dated: December 4, 2018. John J. Martin, Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2018-27132 Filed 12-13-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-03-040 August 15, 2003

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH SCE&G TO DISCUSS 

SECOND SUMMER PLANT LICENSE RENEWAL INSPECTION

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will meet with South Carolina Electric & Gas

management at 8:30 a.m. on Friday, August 22, at the Summer nuclear plant Training Center, 1162

State Highway 213, in Jenkinsville, South Carolina, to discuss the results of the agency’s second

inspection of the plant’s license renewal program.

The meeting will be open to public observation, and NRC officials will be available prior to the

close of the meeting to answer questions from interested observers. A report on the inspection will be

issued approximately 45 days after the meeting and will be available to the public.

The inspection, which began August 4th and runs until the 22nd, is the second license renewal

review at the Summer plant, and is conducted to verify that programs are in place to manage the

material condition of the plant’s systems, structures and components during the 20 additional years of

operation should the NRC approve the license renewal application. 

The NRC conducted a similar meeting in mid-May to discuss results of the agency’s initial

inspection of the Summer license renewal program. SCE&G submitted an application to renew the

Summer plant license in August of last year, and that application, if approved by the NRC, would

extend the expiration date of the plant’s operating license from 2022 to 2042. 

###
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.928 Issuance of negative origin determinations. If, as a result of an origin verification initiated under this subpart, CBP determines that a claim for preferential tariff treatment under this subpart should be denied, it will issue a determination in writing or via an authorized electronic data interchange system to the importer that sets forth the following: ( a ) A description of the good that was the subject of the verification together with the identifying numbers and dates of the import documents pertaining to the good;
( b ) A statement setting forth the findings of fact made in connection with the verification and upon which the determination is based; and
( c ) With specific reference to the rules applicable to originating goods as set forth in General Note 32, HTSUS, and in §§ 10.913 through 10.925 of this subpart, the legal basis for the determination.