alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 103.27 Procedure in the event of a demand for CBP information in a foreign proceeding. ( a ) *Required prior approval for disclosure.* In any foreign proceeding in which CBP is not a party, no CBP employee shall, in response to a demand, furnish CBP documents or testimony as to any material contained in CBP files, any information relating to or based upon material contained in CBP files, or any information or material acquired as part of the performance of that person's official duties (or because of that person's official status) without the prior approval of the Chief Counsel, as described in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Employee notification to Counsel.* Whenever a demand in a foreign proceeding is made upon a CBP employee concerning pre-clearance activities within the territory of the foreign country, that employee shall immediately notify the appropriate Associate Chief Counsel responsible for the pre-clearance location. All other demands in a foreign proceeding shall be reported by CBP employees to the Chief Counsel. The CBP employee shall then await instructions from the Chief Counsel concerning the response to the demand.
( c ) *Counsel notification to originating component.* Upon receipt of a proper demand for CBP information, one which complies with the provisions of § 103.22(c), if the Chief Counsel believes that it will comply with any part of the demand, it will immediately advise the originating component.
( d ) *Conditions for authorization of disclosure.* The Chief Counsel, subject to the terms of paragraph (e) of this section, may authorize the disclosure of CBP documents or the appearance and testimony of a CBP employee if: ( 1 ) Production of the demanded documents or testimony, in the judgment of the Chief Counsel, are appropriate under the factors specified in § 103.23(a) of this subpart; and
( 2 ) None of the factors specified in § 103.23(b) of this subpart exist with respect to the demanded documents or testimony.
( e ) *Limitations on the scope of authorized disclosure.* ( 1 ) The Chief Counsel shall authorize the disclosure of CBP information by a CBP employee without further authorization from CBP officials whenever possible, provided that: ( i ) If necessary, Counsel has consulted with the originating component regarding disclosure of the information demanded;
( ii ) There is no objection from the originating component to the disclosure of the information demanded; and
( iii ) Counsel has sought to limit the demand for information to that which would be consistent with the factors specified in § 103.23 of this part.
( 2 ) In the case of an objection by the originating component, the Chief Counsel shall make the disclosure determination.
[61 FR 19838, May 3, 1996, as amended at 78 FR 70856, Nov. 27, 2013]
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

April 7, 2011

Before

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL P. McCUSKEY, District Judge *

Nos. 09

‐ 3954, 09

‐ 3961 & 10

‐ 1204

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellee

,

v.

SCOTT LEWIS, VERNON WILLIAMS

and LAVOYCE BILLINGSLEY,

Defendants

‐ Appellants

. Appeals from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of

Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 1:07

‐ cr

‐ 00007

Virginia M. Kendall,

Judge

.

O R D E R

The final three paragraphs of the court’s April 6, 2011, opinion in this case are

stricken and the following inserted in their place:

Finally, Lewis and Williams argue that the district judge erred in imposing a

mandatory consecutive sentence under § 924(c). That argument, although contrary to our

precedent, United States v. Easter, 553 F.3d 519 (7th Cir. 2009), is now foreclosed by Abbott v.

United States

, 131 S. Ct. 18 (2010).

For all these reasons, the judgments of the district court are AFFIRMED.

* The Honorable Michael P. McCuskey, United States District Court for the Central

District of Illinois, sitting by designation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      24,710,213
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  587,725
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (119,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,270,097
<PP&E>                                      13,277,330
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,759,624)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,453,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,749,181
<BONDS>                                     42,115,147
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       16,772,830
<PREFERRED>                                  3,000,000
<COMMON>                                         2,663
<OTHER-SE>                                (29,394,162)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,453,371
<SALES>                                         26,309
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,589,690
<CGS>                                            9,996
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,321,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,494,147
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (19,662,977)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (19,662,977)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (19,662,977)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (83.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (83.29)
        

</TABLE>
### §1870. House Historic Buildings Revitalization Trust Fund

#### (a) Establishment

There is hereby established in the Treasury of the United States, as an account for the Architect of the Capitol, the House Historic Buildings Revitalization Trust Fund (hereafter in this section referred to as the "Fund").

#### (b) Use of amounts

Amounts in the Fund shall be used by the Architect of the Capitol for the revitalization of the major historical buildings and assets of the House of Representatives which the Architect is responsible for maintaining and preserving, except that the Architect may not obligate any amounts in the Fund without the approval of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

#### (c) Continuing availability of funds

Any amounts transferred to and merged with, or otherwise deposited into, the Fund shall remain available until expended.

#### (d) Omitted

#### (e) Effective date

This section and the amendment made by this section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2010 and each succeeding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 111–68, div. A, title I, §1304, Oct. 1, 2009, 123 Stat. 2035.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 1304 of Pub. L. 111–68. Subsec. (d) of section 1304 of Pub. L. 111–68 amended section 5507 of this title.

Section is from the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2010, which is div. A of Pub. L. 111–68.
§ 185.138 Reconsideration of initial decision. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, any party may file a motion for reconsideration of the initial decision within 20 days of receipt of the initial decision. If service was made by mail, receipt will be presumed to be 5 days from the date of mailing in the absence of contrary proof.
( b ) Every such motion must set forth the matters claimed to have been erroneously decided and the nature of the alleged errors. Such motion shall be accompanied by a supporting brief.
( c ) Responses to such motions shall be allowed only upon request of the ALJ.
( d ) No party may file a motion for reconsideration of an initial decision that has been revised in response to a previous motion for reconsideration.
( e ) The ALJ may dispose of a motion for reconsideration by denying it or by issuing a revised initial decision.
( f ) If the ALJ denies a motion for reconsideration, the initial decision shall constitute the final decision of the authority head and shall be final and binding on all parties 30 days after the ALJ denies the motion, unless the initial decision is timely appealed to the authority head in accordance with § 185.139.
( g ) If the ALJ issues a revised initial decision, that decision shall constitute the final decision of the authority head and shall be final and binding on the parties 30 days after it is issued, unless it is timely appealed to the authority head in accordance with § 185.139.
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2013-0519

Docket Number

2010-SW-068-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

Eurocopter Deutschland Flight Manual BO 105 C/CS, Revision 5, Page 2-25

Eurocopter Deutschland Flight Manual BO 105 CB/CBS, Revision 8, Pages 2-8 and 2-27

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-061 May 25, 2001

 ACRS SUBCOMMITTEE ON RELIABILITY AND PROBABILISTIC RISK 

ASSESSMENT TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, ON JUNE 22

The Nuclear Regulatory Commissionís Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has

scheduled a meeting of its subcommittee on reliability and probabilistic risk assessment on June 22 in

Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agencyís Two

White North building, at 11545 Rockville Pike. It will begin at 8:30 a.m.

The subcommittee will review the NRC staffís draft report on the Individual Plant Examination

of External Events (IPEEE) Insight Program, (NUREG-1742). 

For more information contact Mike Markley, at 301-415-6885. ACRS meeting notices,

transcripts and letters are available on the internet, at http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW/ .

###
#### Alfred A. Whitman, Respondent, v. Alfred J. O’Donovan, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) / Rule 15d-14(a),
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-K of TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited
Partnership;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 34-47986];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 February 28, 2007
    /s/  WILLIAM G. MANIASWilliam G. ManiasVice President and Chief Financial
Officer
TEPPCO GP, Inc., General Partner
<Page>

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective
Amendment No. 5 to the registration statement on Form S-6 (No. 333-69327) of our
report dated February 15, 2002, relating to the financial statements of Fortis
Benefits Insurance Company, which appears in the Prospectus constituting part of
Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to such registration statement. We also consent
to the incorporation by reference of our report dated April 6, 2001, relating to
the financial statements of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account
C, which appears in such Prospectus. We also consent to the reference to us
under the heading "Independent Public Accountants" in such Prospectus.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 21, 2003
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-088 August 12, 2002

 

NRC ANNOUNCES OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING ON LICENSE RENEWAL 

APPLICATION FOR H. B. ROBINSON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced the opportunity to request a hearing on an

 application for a 20-year renewal of the operating license of the H.B. Robinson nuclear power plant, 

Unit 2. 

The plant is located in Hartsville, South Carolina. The current operating license for the facility

expires on July 31, 2010. Unit 1 is a fossil fuel plant.

Carolina Power & Light Co. submitted the application on June 17. A notice of receipt was

published by NRC in the Federal Register on July 18. The staff has determined that CP&L has

submitted sufficient information for the NRC to formally "docket," or file, the application and conduct

a detailed review. 

Operating licenses are issued by the NRC for commercial power reactors to operate for up to

40 years. This term was selected on the basis of economic and antitrust considerations - not technical

limitations. The NRC has a process in place for renewing an operating license for up to an additional

20 years of plant life if certain requirements are met for plant operations.

 The deadline for hearing requests is 30 days from the date of publication of the Federal

Register notice, expected shortly. By that time, requests must be filed by anyone whose interest might

be affected by the license renewal and who wishes to participate as a party to the proceeding. 

Requests for a hearing must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications

Staff. They may also be delivered to the NRC Public Document Room at 11555 Rockville Pike,

Rockville, Maryland. A copy of the request should also be sent to the Office of the General Counsel,

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, by FAX to (301) 415-3725,

by email to: OGCmailcenter@nrc.gov. and to Mr. John Moyer, Vice President, H.B. Robinson Steam

Electric Plant, Carolina Power & Light Co., 3581 West Entrance Road, Hartsville, S.C. 29550. 

Additional information about the opportunity for hearing may be found in the Federal Register

notice.
 Copies of the license renewal application will be available at the NRC web site at

 http:/www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications.html, and are also available

through the NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). Help in

using ADAMS is available by contacting the NRC Public Document Room staff at 301-415-4737 or 

1-800-397-4209, or by sending a message to pdr@nrc.gov via e-mail. The application is available for

public inspection at the NRC’s Public Document Room in Rockville, Md. 

In addition, a copy of the license renewal application is available at the Hartsville Memorial

Library, in Hartsville, S.C.

###
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1521

To provide for additional lands to be included within the boundary of the 

Johnstown Flood National Memorial in the State of Pennsylvania, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 31, 2003

Mr. MURTHA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To provide for additional lands to be included within the 

boundary of the Johnstown Flood National Memorial 

in the State of Pennsylvania, and for other purposes.

1 Be enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Johnstown Flood Na5 tional Memorial Boundary Adjustment Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BOUNDARY OF JOHNSTOWN FLOOD NATIONAL ME7 MORIAL. 

8 The boundary of the Johnstown Flood National Me9 morial (‘‘Memorial’’) is modified to include the area as 
2

HR 1521 IH 

1 generally depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Johnstown Flood 

2 National Memorial, Cambria County, Commonwealth of 

3 Pennsylvania’’, numbered N.E.R.O. 427/80,007 and dated 

4 June, 2001. The map shall be on file and available for 

5 inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park 

6 Service, Department of the Interior. 

7 SEC. 3. ACQUISITION OF LANDS. 

8 The Secretary of the Interior (‘‘Secretary’’) is author9 ized to acquire from willing sellers the land or interests 

10 in land as described in section 2 by donation, purchase 

11 with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange. 

12 SEC. 4. ADMINISTRATION OF LANDS. 

13 Lands added to the Memorial by section 2 shall be 

14 administered by the Secretary as part of the Memorial in 

15 accordance with applicable laws and regulations. 

16 SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

17 In addition to amounts otherwise made available for 

18 land acquisition, there are authorized to be appropriated 

19 such sums as may be necessary to carry out the purposes 

20 of this Act.

Æ
§ 185.109 Answer. ( a ) The defendant may request a hearing in the answer filed with the reviewing official within 30 days of service of the complaint.
( b ) In the answer, the defendant: ( 1 ) Shall admit or deny each of the allegations of liability made in the complaint;
( 2 ) Shall state any defense on which the defendant intends to rely;
( 3 ) May state any reasons why the defendant contends that the penalties and assessments should be less than the statutory maximum; and
( 4 ) Shall state the name, address, and telephone number of the person authorized by the defendant to act as defendant's representative, if any.
( c ) If the defendant is unable to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section within the time provided, the defendant may, before the expiration of 30 days from service of the complaint, file with the reviewing official a general answer denying liability and requesting a hearing, and a request for an extension of time within which to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. The reviewing official shall file promptly with the ALJ the complaint, the general answer denying liability, and the request for an extension of time as provided in § 185.110. For good cause shown, the ALJ may grant the defendant up to 30 additional days within which to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. The ALJ shall decide expeditiously whether the dependent shall be granted an additional period of time to file such answer.
### -88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

34 36 38 40 42 

## ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/03 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 03 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-03-028 April 10, 2003

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: opa2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $3,000 CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST WEST VIRGINIA

COMPANY FOR VIOLATIONS OF NRC RADIATION SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $3,000 civil penalty against

American Geotech, Inc. of Charleston, West Virginia, for violations of NRC safety requirements

related to the use of licensed material.

In a letter to the company, Luis A. Reyes, Administrator of the NRC’s Region II office in

Atlanta, said an NRC inspection and investigation found that the company had intentionally failed to 

provide approved dosimetry (devices used to measure radiation exposure) to an employee who was

exposed to radiation, and that the company had failed to properly train an individual prior to allowing

his unsupervised use of a moisture density gauge containing radioactive material.

Reyes said no actual radiological consequences occurred as a result of the violations, but that

the civil penalty was being proposed because of the deliberate nature of the violations and the fact that

the NRC identified the violations. The NRC staff has concluded that the company’s corrective actions

taken and planned to prevent recurrence are adequate. 

The NRC’s letter, its enclosures and the company’s response will be made available through

the agency’s Web site at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ADAMS.html . Help in accessing the document is

available from the NRC Public Document Room at 301-415-4737 or 1-800-397-4209.

The company has 30 days from receipt of the letter to either pay the civil penalty or to protest

its imposition. 

###