alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 172.14 Headquarters advice.

The advice of the Director, Border Security and Trade Compliance Division, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade, CBP Headquarters, may be sought in any case (except as provided in this section), without regard to delegated authority to act on a petition or offer, when a novel or complex issue concerning a ruling, policy, or procedure is presented concerning a CBP action(s) or potential CBP action(s) relating to penalties secured by bonds (including penalty-based determinations of duty except as provided in this section), claims for liquidated damages or mitigating any claim. This section does not apply to actual duty loss tenders determined by CBP pursuant to § 162.74(c) of this chapter relating to prior disclosure. The request for advice may be initiated by the bond principal, surety or any CBP officer, but must be submitted to the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer. The Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer retains the authority to refuse to forward any request that fails to raise a qualifying issue and to seek legal advice from the appropriate Associate or Assistant Chief Counsel in any case.
Exhibit 99.1


                           GREG MANNING AUCTIONS, INC.
                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Greg Manning Auctions,
Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2003, I, Greg Manning, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Greg Manning Auctions, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   this Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with
          the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
          Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended March
          31, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
          condition and results of operations of Greg Manning Auctions, Inc.


Dated:   May 9, 2003

                                          /s/ Greg Manning
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Greg Manning, President and Chief
                                          Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Cancellation of an environmental impact statement. EIS No. 990413. 

# SUMMARY:

                        On July 24, 1998, a notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Salmon River Canyon Project; Nez Perce National Forest, Payette National Forest, Bitteroot National Forest, Salmon/Challis National Forest was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         (63 FR 39810). The Forest Service has decided to cancel the preparation of an EIS for this proposed action. The Notice of Intent is hereby withdrawn.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Direct questions regarding this cancellation may be directed to Ken Stump, Assistant Fire Management Officer, RR 2 Box 475 Grangeville, ID 83530 or telephone 208-983-1950.

Steve E. Williams,

Acting Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 04-24210  Filed 10-28-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 240 (Friday, December 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64371-64372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27269]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

    The National Science Board's Task Force on the Skilled Technical 
Workforce, pursuant to NSF regulations

[[Page 64372]]

(45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 
U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 
552b), hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for 
the transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:

TIME AND DATE: Friday, December 21, 2018 at 2:00-3:00 p.m. EST.

PLACE: This meeting will be held by teleconference at the National 
Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314. An 
audio link will be available for the public. Members of the public must 
contact the Board Office to request the public audio link by sending an 
email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7a141b0e1315141b160919131f14191f18081e3a14091c541d150c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ee808f9a8781808f829d8d878b808d8b8c9c8aae809d88c0898198">[email protected]</span></a> at least 24 hours prior to the 
teleconference.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Discussion of the Task Force's deliverables 
and associated production timelines.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Christina Maranto, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#66050b0714070812092608150048010910"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="88ebe5e9fae9e6fce7c8e6fbeea6efe7fe">[email protected]</span></a>, 703-292-7000. Meeting 
information and updates may be found at http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/notices.jsp#sunshine. Please refer to the National Science Board 
website at www.nsf.gov/nsb for general information.

Chris Blair,
Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.
[FR Doc. 2018-27269 Filed 12-12-18; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 21.1**

OMNI Energy Services Corp’s Subsidiaries 

OMNI Energy Services Corp. 

Trussco, Inc. 

Trussco Properties, L.L.C.

American Helicopters Inc. 

OMNI Energy Seismic Services, L.L.C. 

OMNI Aviation Corp. 

OMNI Labor Corporation 

OMNI Properties Corp.

OMNI Energy Services Corp. – Mexico 

OMNI Energy Transportation Corp. 

Preheat, Inc. 

Rig Tools, Inc. 

BMJ Industrial Investments,L.L.C. 

Charles Holston, Inc. (wholly-owned subsidiary of BMJ Industrial Investments, L.L.C.) 

B.E.G. Liquid Mud Services, Corp. 

IndustrialLift Truck & Equipment Co. Inc. 

OMNI Energia Mexicana 

OMNI International Energy Services 

AmericanAviation L.L.C. 

OMNI Energy Services – Alaska, Inc. 

Hamilton Drill Tech, Inc. 

Gulf Coast Resources, Inc.
### §4336. Discretionary authority of Senate Committee on Appropriations

#### (a) In general

The Committee on Appropriations is authorized in its discretion—

(1) to hold hearings, report such hearings, and make investigations as authorized by paragraph 1 of rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate;

(2) to make expenditures from the contingent fund of the Senate;

(3) to employ personnel;

(4) with the prior consent of the Government department or agency concerned and the Committee on Rules and Administration to use, on a reimbursable or nonreimbursable basis, the services of personnel of any such department or agency;

(5) to procure the services of individual consultants, or organizations thereof (as authorized by section 4301(i) of this title and Senate Resolution 140, agreed to May 14, 1975, except that any approval (and related reporting requirement) shall not apply); and

(6) to provide for the training of the professional staff of such committee (under procedures specified by section 4301(j) of this title).

#### (b) Omitted

#### (c) Effective date

This section shall be effective on and after October 1, 1998, or the date of enactment of this Act [October 21, 1998], whichever is later.

(Pub. L. 105–275, title I, §10, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2435; Pub. L. 109–55, title I, §6, Aug. 2, 2005, 119 Stat. 568.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Senate Resolution 140, agreed to May 14, 1975, referred to in subsec. (a)(5), is Senate Resolution 140, 94th Congress, which is not classified to the Code.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 72d of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is comprised of section 10 of Pub. L. 105–275. Subsec. (b) of section 10 of Pub. L. 105–275 amended section 4 of Senate Resolution 54, 105th Congress, which is not classified to the Code.

Section is from the Congressional Operations Appropriations Act, 1999, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1999.

#### Amendments

2005—Subsec. (a)(5). Pub. L. 109–55 inserted ", except that any approval (and related reporting requirement) shall not apply" after "May 14, 1975".
#### Martha Bergman, Respondent, v. Louis Bergman, Appellant.

Respondent having stated in open court that when appellant signs the proffered papers she will have them executed and delivered as required by the judgment, the orders appealed from are affirmed, without costs. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
### §61g–4. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 61g–4 was editorially reclassified as section 6156 of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 61g–4, Pub. L. 95–26, title I, §100, May 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 80, authorized Secretary of Conference of Majority and Secretary of Conference of Minority each to appoint and fix compensation of an Executive Assistant and a Secretary. These positions were abolished by section 102 of Pub. L. 96–38, effective Oct. 1, 1979.
EXHIBIT 12



                  PRIME MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                 FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND 1997
                                   (Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<S>                                                                               <C>           <C>   

                                                                                   Six Months Ended
                                                                                         June 30,
                                                                                   1998          1997
                                                                                  -------       -------

Income before income taxes and after minority interest                            $ 4,424       $ 8,647

Undistributed equity income                                                           (14)         (160)

Minority interest income of subsidiaries with fixed charges                         1,789         2,710
                                                                                  -------       -------

Adjusted earnings                                                                   6,199        11,197
                                                                                  =======       =======

Interest on debt                                                                    4,114         3,743

Debt issuance costs                                                                 4,982           360
                                                                                  -------       -------

Total fixed charges                                                                 9,096         4,103
                                                                                  -------       -------

Total available earnings before fixed charges                                      15,295        15,300
                                                                                  =======       =======

Ratio                                                                                 1.7           3.7
                                                                                  =======       =======


</TABLE>
### §57a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 57a was editorially reclassified as section 4314 of this title.
. . 

0 

ia * “ 

.., .* 

OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

gononblr F. 8. Oaodlo 

county At*mby 

rrallltlin county 

Mt. Vernon, Tour 

Dear SirI 

ad under thr dll o o ur t, is a 

to the oourt rohi8 offlolal fee8 

8am time llablr 

the rubstltute repfnion or thir Departub8titute 8tenographor 18 U8Od under 

e Court, 18 a COOnty liablr t0 the 

for hi8 otfloial iSo8, and at tho 

0 for fero to the rubetitutr Reporter? 

of explanation ror the above question, 

er hr0mfai0n. The judldal DirtriOt 18 

oompored of more than one County. Tou unbrrtand that 

the fee ir didad tor monthly paynmt8 in pro rata 

ror oaoh oounty. The ofilolal Court Reporter ha8 

been unable to attend the lart ternuof the Di8triot 
Honorable F. 8. Caudle, Page Z 

Court, and a rubatltute Raporter used. Both 

Sfle alai08 for the time. The county objeota 

to paying both olalms." 

Art1010 Z3.23, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes, 

reads a8 follows: 

*In oa8e OS Illnerr, pre88 of offlolal mrk, 

or rrnavOI4able ai8Sbiiity or the orrI0Ial 8hortA 

hand reporter to psriom~ bI8 dutlea In reporting 

prooea4lnga la court, the judge of the oourt may, 

In hlr alroretlon, authorlze a deputy 8hOrtbaDd 

reporter to aot during the absenoe of raid oificlal 

shorthand reporter and 8afa deputy 8bOrthaM reporter rball raoelve, Uurlng the tIae b e l ot8 tar 8Sia 

offlolal shorthand reportar, the salary and fee8 

a8 the oftIola1 rhorthand reporter of raid oourt, 

to be paid In the manner provided for the oitlolal 

rhorthant? rbporter; but the raid ofiIoIal rhorthand 

reporter shall also reetdre hi8 relary in full during raid temporary 4IrabllIty to aOt. The oeoesalty 

for a deputy OffIoIal rhorthand reporter shall be 

left entirely within the 41eoretIon of the Judge of 

the oourt . . 

Under the abort quote4 8tatute, the neoessfty for 

a deputy 0rrf0m 8borthand reporter I8 hit eutlraly rt?tbln 

the UI8oretIon oi the judge o? the oourt. :?hen a deputy oourt 

reporter 18 appointed by the oourt 8aid depaty reporter 8hall 

reoelre during the time ha aotr ror 8ald ofilolal shorthand 

reporter thm 8eme ralary en4 fee8 a8 the OfrlOIti 8horthan4 

reporter of the ooart to ba pal4 In the manner provided for 

the orri0i0i rhorthand reporter. Al80 the orrf0fai rhorthand 

reporter rhall reoelre hi8 rralary In ruii during hi8 temporam 

alaablllty to aot. 

Tharerore, you are raa?sotfully adrlaed that it Is 

the OpInIon Oi thI8 Dewrtmnt that your question 8bOdd be 

answered in the afrlznatIre end Is 80 anlrwerad. The salary 

of the doguty rhorthand reporter must be paid in the manner 

pmrlded for the ottlola 8hbrthan4 reporter. Both tha OHIolal shorthand reporter and the deputy shorthand reporter are 

entitled to the oompennatlon provided by law. 
371 

Honorable F. 8. Caudle, Page 3 

Trusting that the foregoing tally enmera your 

Inquiry, we remain 

Your8 very truly 

ATTCRlV3Y OFNERAL OF TEXAS 

By -u& 

Ardell WIllla~~ 

A88f 8tCat 

AiT:BBB 

Gl’4d 

ATTORNEY GEl?E3AL OF TEXAS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7626

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MATTHEW YATES,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior

District Judge. (3:11-cr-00374-CMC-1)

Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 24, 2013

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew Yates, Appellant Pro Se. John David Rowell, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Matthew Yates seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Yates has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 171.23 Decisions not protestable. ( a ) *Mitigation decision not subject to protest.* Any decision to remit a forfeiture or mitigate a penalty is not a protestable decision as defined under the provisions of 19 U.S.C. 1514. Any payment made in compliance with any decision to remit a forfeiture or mitigate a penalty is not a charge or exaction and therefore is not a protestable action as defined under the provisions of 19 U.S.C. 1514.
( b ) *Payment of mitigated amount as accord and satisfaction.* Payment of a mitigated amount in compliance with an administrative decision on a petition or supplemental petition for relief will be considered an election of administrative proceedings and full disposition of the case. Payment of a mitigated amount will act as an accord and satisfaction of the Government claim. Payment of a mitigated amount will never serve as a bar to filing a supplemental petition for relief.
§ 208.12 Contents of petition. The petition shall include information in support of the claim that action under section 324 of the Act continues to be necessary to remedy or prevent material harm to the industry, as defined by the Commission in its determination under section 322 of the Act, including information relating to changes since the action was taken with respect to: ( a ) The volume and tonnage of merchandise transported by the industry;
( b ) Employment, wages, hours of service, and working conditions relating to the industry;
( c ) With respect to cargo originating in Mexico, the principal ports of entry along the United States-Mexico border of such shipments, and the principal destinations within the United States for such shipments;
( d ) With respect to cargo originating in United States, the principal place(s) where such cargo is loaded, and principal destination(s) in Mexico or inside a border commercial zone as defined in § 208.2(b);
( e ) The share of the United States market as a whole, or the share of the specific sub-market, held by persons of Mexico; and
( f ) Any other relevant information in support of the claim that action continues to be necessary.
Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 89 FR 20832, Mar. 25, 2024.

§ 351.517 Exemption or remission upon export of indirect taxes. ( a ) *Benefit.* In the case of the exemption or remission upon export of indirect taxes, a benefit exists to the extent that the Secretary determines that the amount remitted or exempted exceeds the amount levied with respect to the production and distribution of like products when sold for domestic consumption.
( b ) *Time of receipt of benefit.* In the case of the exemption or remission upon export of an indirect tax, the Secretary normally will consider the benefit as having been received as of the date of exportation.
( c ) *Allocation of benefit to a particular time period.* Normally, the Secretary will allocate (expense) the benefit from the exemption or remission upon export of indirect taxes to the year in which the benefit is considered to have been received under paragraph (b) of this section.
`[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 27, 2004)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 62793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24130]



[[Page 62791]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part IV





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Presidential Determination No. 2005-01 of October 7, 2004--
Determination Pursuant to Section 2(c)(1) of the Migration and Refugee 
Assistance Act of 1962, as Amended



Presidential Determination No. 2005-02 of October 14, 2004--Waiver and 
Certification of Statutory Provisions Regarding the Palestine 
Liberation Organization



Presidential Determination No. 2005-03 of October 16, 2004--Provision 
of U.S. Drug Interdiction Assistance to the Government of Brazil
 
 
                         Presidential Documents 
 
 

  Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 27, 2004 / 
Presidential Documents  

 ___________________________________________________________________

 Title 3--
 The President

[[Page 62793]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2005-01 of October 7, 
                2004

                
Determination Pursuant to Section 2(c)(1) of the 
                Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962, as 
                Amended

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to section 2(c)(1) of the Migration and 
                Refugee Assistance Act of 1962, as amended, 22 U.S.C. 
                2601(c)(1), I hereby determine that it is important to 
                the national interest that up to $8 million be made 
                available from the U.S. Emergency Refugee and Migration 
                Assistance Fund to meet unexpected urgent refugee and 
                migration needs related to the Burundi refugee 
                repatriation and reintegration. These funds may be 
                used, as appropriate, to provide contributions to 
                international, governmental, and nongovernmental 
                organizations, and, as necessary, for administrative 
                expenses of the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and 
                Migration.

                You are authorized and directed to inform the 
                appropriate committees of the Congress of this 
                determination and the obligation of funds under this 
                authority, and to arrange for the publication of this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, October 7, 2004.

[FR Doc. 04-24130
Filed 10-26-04; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P`