Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Homeland Security Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 100
[CGD07-04-120]
RIN 1625-AA08
 AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
 ACTION: Final rule.
 SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a permanent local regulation for the Columbus Day Regatta. The event is held annually on Saturday and Sunday of the Columbus Day weekend on Biscayne Bay, Miami, Florida. This regulation creates a regulated area that temporarily limits the movement of non-participant vessels. This regulation is needed to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during the event.
 DATES: This rule is effective October 9, 2004.
 ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket, are part of docket (CGD07-04-120) and will be available for inspection or copying at Coast Guard Sector Miami between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: BMC D. Vaughn, Coast Guard Sector Miami, Miami Beach, Florida, (305) 535-4317.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulatory Information On September 1, 2004, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) entitled “Special Local Regulations; Columbus Day Regatta, Biscayne Bay, Miami, FL” in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     (FR Doc. 04-19913). We received no letters commenting on the proposed rule. No public meeting was requested, and none was held. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . The event is to be held on 9 and 10 October 2004 and it is in the interest of public safety to have this rule in effect at this time. Background and Purpose Columbus Day Regatta, Inc., sponsors a sailboat race with approximately 500 sailboats, ranging in length from 20 to 60 ft, that participate in the event. The 
                    ( print page 61443)
                    race takes place in Biscayne Bay, from Dinner Key to Soldier Key, Saturday and Sunday during the second weekend in October (Columbus Day Weekend). Approximately 50 spectator craft, and several hundred additional vessels, transit the area for the annual event. These regulations are intended to provide for the safety of life on the waters of Biscayne Bay during the event by controlling traffic in the regulated area. Discussion of Rule This rule creates a regulated area and prohibits non-participant vessels from entering the regulated area without the permission of the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. When the Coast Guard Patrol Commander determines that it is safe for vessels to transit the regulated area, vessel traffic may resume normal operations at the completion of the scheduled races and exhibitions, and between scheduled racing events. The regulated area encompasses all waters within the following points: *Latitude*
*Longitude*25°43′24′′ N
080°12′30′′ W25°43′24′′ N
080°10′30′′ W25°33′00′′ N
080°11′30′′ W25°33′00′′ N
080°15′54′′ W25°40′00′′ N
080°15′00′′ W
 Regulatory Evaluation This rule is not a “significant regulatory action” under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not “significant” under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. Entry into the regulated area is prohibited for only limited time periods. Additionally, when the Coast Guard Patrol Commander determines that it is safe for vessels to transit the regulated area, vessel traffic may be allowed to resume normal operations at the completion of scheduled races and exhibitions and between scheduled racing events. Also, vessels may otherwise be allowed to enter the regulated area with permission of the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. Finally, advance notifications to the maritime community through marine information broadcasts will allow mariners to adjust plans accordingly. Small Entities Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term “small entities” comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in that portion of Biscayne Bay, between Dinner Key and Soldier Key, from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m., on the Saturday and Sunday of Columbus Day weekend. The regulations will only be in effect for 2 days in an area of limited commercial traffic. Also, vessel traffic will be allowed to resume normal operations at the completion of scheduled races and exhibitions, and between scheduled racing events, when the Coast Guard Patrol Commander determines it is safe to do so. Vessels may otherwise be allowed to enter the regulated area with permission of the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. Assistance for Small Entities Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small entities in understanding this rule so that they could better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. The Coast Guard offered its availability to answer inquiries from the public through responses to any comments generated by this rulemaking. No comments were received. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). Collection of Information This rule calls for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). Federalism A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for federalism. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. Taking of Private Property This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights. Civil Justice Reform This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. Protection of Children We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might disproportionately affect children. Indian Tribal Governments This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
                    ( print page 61444) Energy Effects We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a “significant energy action” under that order, because it is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211. Technical Standards The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (
                    *e.g.*, specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, from further environmental documentation. Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, an “Environmental Analysis Check List” and a “Categorical Exclusion Determination” are not required for this rule. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100 Marine Safety
Navigation (water)
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, waterways
 For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 100 as follows: PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
 1.The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows: Authority:
                        33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 2.Add § 100.729 to read as follows: § 100.729
  (a) 
                            *Regulated area.*
                             A regulated area is established for the Columbus Day Regatta, Biscayne Bay, Miami, Florida. The regulated area encompasses all waters within the following points: *Latitude*
*Longitude*25°43′24′′ N
080°12′30′′ W25°43′24′′ N
080°10′30′′ W25°33′00′′ N
080°11′30′′ W25°33′00′′ N
080°15′54′′ W25°40′00′′ N
080°15′00′′ W
 (b) 
                            *Definitions.*
                             Coast Guard Patrol 
                            *Commander*
                             means a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the Coast Guard who has been designated by Commanding Officer, Coast Guard Station Miami Beach. (c) 
                            *Special Local Regulations.* (1) Entry into the regulated area by non-participant persons or vessels is prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. (2) At the completion of scheduled races and exhibitions, and departure of participants from the regulated area, the Coast Guard Patrol Commander may permit traffic to resume normal operations. (3) Between scheduled racing events, the Coast Guard Patrol Commander may permit traffic to resume normal operations for a limited time. (4) A succession of not fewer than 5 short whistle or horn blasts from a Coast Guard patrol vessel will be the signal for any and all vessels to take immediate steps to avoid collision. (d) 
                            *Enforcement periods.*
                             This rule will be enforced from 10 a.m. until 5 p.m. Saturday and Sunday during the second weekend in October (Columbus Day weekend).
 Dated: October 6, 2004. D. Brian Peterman, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District.


[FR Doc. 04-23371 Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-15-P