alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AAM-12-448-E 

July 9, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10581 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0690 

Mr. Curt Drumm 

President 

Lakeshore Aviation 

1815 Freedom Way 

Manitowoe, WI 54220 

Dear Mr. Drumm: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated June 12, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Lakeshore Aviation for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Lakeshore Aviation to cover its safetysensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Lakeshore Aviation. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two drug and alcohol testing 

programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of 
2 

safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was 

unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Lakeshore Aviation an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 

to the extent necessary to allow Lakeshore Aviation to cover its safety-sensitive employees 

under one drug and alcohol testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations 

described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Lakeshore Aviation are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations 

at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of 

the Lakeshore Aviation part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

Frederick E Tilton, M.D. 

Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
### Figure 9 15-Mile Target Distance Limit Anaconda Aluminum Co Col Fls Red Plt Columbia Falls, Montana Date: 2/17/2015 

### River Mile Marker Surface Water & Sediment Sample Location
Rivers & Streams P robable Point of Entry (PPE)

0 0.5 1 Miles Prepared for: U.S. EPA Region 8 Contract No.: EP-S8-13-01 TDD: 1407-05 DCN: W0 157 .1A.00 381 Prepared By: Weston Solutions, Inc. START IV Suite 100 1435 Garrison Street Lakewood, CO 80215 

## Anaconda Anaconda Aluminum Co Aluminum Co
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1549-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1549-DR), dated September 15, 2004, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

October 22, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Alabama is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 15, 2004: 

Cherokee County for Public Assistance. 

Bullock, Houston, and Jackson Counties for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance). 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs; 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 04-24180 Filed 10-28-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-127 October 6, 2004

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING IN ATLANTA

OCT. 13-15 ON FIRE PROTECTION STANDARD, INSPECTIONS

Members of the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation will meet with the public at the

agency’s Region II office in Atlanta from Oct. 13 - 15, to discuss how the National Fire Protection

Association’s (NFPA) Standard 805 will be applied at the nation’s commercial nuclear power plants, as

well as the resumption of electrical cable inspections at the plants.

The meeting will be held in the 24th floor main conference room of the Sam Nunn Atlanta

Federal Center, 61 Forsyth St. SW, from 8 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. on Oct. 13 and 14, and from 8 a.m. - 11:30

a.m. on Oct. 15. The meeting agenda includes how the agency will transition to NFPA 805, how

inspections will be carried out using the standard, and other practical applications for the standard. The

public will be able to discuss these issues with the staff at designated points.

A preliminary draft of the regulatory guide covering NFPA 805, DG-1139, is available on the

NRC’s Web site at this address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/reg-guides/power-reactors/draft-index.html . Any

questions on the public meeting should be directed to James Downs at 301-415-3194 or Joyce

Calloway at 404-562-4668.

###
### §504. National Guard schools and small arms competitions

(a) Under regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary of the Army or Secretary of the Air Force, as the case may be, members of the National Guard may—

(1) attend schools conducted by the Army or the Air Force, as appropriate;

(2) conduct or attend schools conducted by the National Guard; or

(3) participate in small arms competitions.

(b) Activities authorized under subsection (a) for members of the National Guard of a State or territory, Puerto Rico, or the District of Columbia may be held inside or outside its boundaries.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 611; Pub. L. 88–621, §1(2), Oct. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 999; Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title XII, §1234(b)(1), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2059.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 504(a)504(b) | 32:64 (1st sentence).32:64 (less 1st sentence). | June 3, 1916, ch. 134, §97 (less last sentence); restated May 28, 1926, ch. 417, §2 (less last sentence), 44 Stat. 674. |

504(b)

32:64 (less 1st sentence).

In subsection (a), the word "members" is substituted for the words "officers, warrant officers, and enlisted men". The words "for the purpose" and "for that purpose" are omitted as surplusage.

In subsection (b), the words "Assemblies under subsection (a)" are substituted for the words "such assemblages". The words "for members of the National Guard of a State or Territory, Puerto Rico, the Canal Zone, or the District of Columbia * * * inside or outside of its boundaries" are substituted for the words "either within or without the State, Territory, or District of Columbia, to which the members of the National Guard designated to attend them shall belong".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–456 struck out "the Canal Zone," after "Puerto Rico,".

1964—Pub. L. 88–621 substituted provisions authorizing the Secretaries of the Army and of the Air Force to issue regulations, for provisions authorizing the President to issue regulations, and provided that members of the National Guard may conduct or attend schools conducted by the National Guard.
### §6502. Information on grants received

On request of a chief executive officer of a State, a State legislature, or an official designated by either of them, an executive agency carrying out a grant program to States and local governments shall provide the requesting officer or legislature with written information on the purpose and amounts of grants provided to the State or local government.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1007.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6502 | 42:4211. | Oct. 16, 1968, Pub. L. 90–577, §201, 82 Stat. 1101. |

The words "chief executive officer" are substituted for "Governor" because the definition of State includes the District of Columbia. The words "executive agency" are substituted for "department or agency of the United States Government" because of the definition in sections 102 and 6501(3) of the revised title. The words "shall provide the requesting officer or legislature" are substituted for the last sentence of 42:4211 to eliminate unnecessary words. The word "information" is substituted for "such data" because it is more accurate. The words "in writing" and "actual" are omitted as unnecessary.
#### In the Matter of Arthur Kram et al., Appellants, against Paul L. Ross et al., Constituting the Temporary City Housing Rent Commission of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
### §6. Personal interest of director and members of Bureau in mines

In conducting inquiries and investigations authorized under sections 1, 3, and 5 to 7 of this title neither the director nor any member of the United States Bureau of Mines shall have any personal or private interest in any mine or the products of any mine under investigation, or shall accept employment from any private party for services in the examination of any mine or private mineral property, or issue any report as to the valuation or the management of any mine or other private mineral property. Nothing herein shall be construed as preventing the temporary employment by the United States Bureau of Mines, at a compensation not to exceed $10 per day, in a consulting capacity or in the investigation of special subjects, of any engineer or other expert whose principal professional practice is outside of such employment by said bureau.

(May 16, 1910, ch. 240, §4, 36 Stat. 370; Feb. 25, 1913, ch. 72, §4, 37 Stat. 682; Pub. L. 102–285, §10(b), May 18, 1992, 106 Stat. 172.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"United States Bureau of Mines" substituted in text for "Bureau of Mines" pursuant to section 10(b) of Pub. L. 102–285, set out as a note under section 1 of this title. For provisions relating to closure and transfer of functions of the United States Bureau of Mines, see Transfer of Functions note set out under section 1 of this title.
§ 1302.6 Appeals. ( a ) If you wish to appeal a decision by OMB with regard to your request to access or amend a record in accordance with the provisions of §§ 1302.2 and 1302.5, you should submit the appeal in writing and, to the extent possible, include the information specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) Your appeal should contain a brief description of the record involved or copies of the correspondence from OMB in which the request to access or to amend was denied and also the reasons why you believe that access should be granted or the information amended, as relevant. Your appeal should refer to the information you furnished in support of your claim and the reasons set forth by OMB in its decision denying access or amendment, as required by §§ 1302.2 and 1302.5. In order to make the appeal process as meaningful as possible, you should set forth your disagreement in an understandable manner. In order to avoid the unnecessary retention of personal information, OMB reserves the right to dispose of the material concerning the request to access or amend a record if OMB receives no appeal in accordance with this section within 180 days of the sending by OMB of its decision upon an initial request. OMB may treat an appeal received after the 180-day period as an initial request to access or amend a record.
( c ) You may send your appeal by mail or delivery to the Senior Agency Official for Privacy, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street NW, Room 9204, Washington, DC 20503 or by electronic means as described on OMB's privacy program web page: *www.whitehouse.gov/omb/privacy .* For the quickest possible handling, the requester should specify “Privacy Act Record Appeal” on the letter.
( d ) The Senior Agency Official for Privacy will review a refusal to amend a record within 30 business days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal Federal holidays) from the date on which the individual requests such review, unless the OMB Director extends the 30-day period for good cause. If the Senior Agency Official for Privacy's decision does not grant in full the request, the notice of the decision will describe the steps you may take to obtain judicial review of such a decision.
§ 1400.203 Periodic reinvestigation requirements. ( a ) The incumbent of a national security position requiring eligibility for access to classified information is subject to the reinvestigation requirements of E.O. 12968.
( b ) The incumbent of a national security position that does not require eligibility for access to classified information is subject to periodic reinvestigation at least once every five years. Such reinvestigation must be conducted using a national security questionnaire, and at a frequency and scope that will satisfy the reinvestigation requirements for both national security and public trust positions.
## MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800WashingtonBoulevard.BaltimoreMD 21230 

# MDE 410-537-3000. 1-800-633-6101
Martin O'Malley RobertM. Summers, Ph.D Governor Acting Secretary Anthony G. Brown Lieutenant Governor



# ,DEC 15 201 Mr. Shawn M. Garvin Regional Administrator 

### (3RAOO) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III 1650Arch Street Philadelphia PA 19103-2029 Dear Mr. Garvin: The purpose ofthis letter is to submitthe enclosed State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision 

### # 10-09 concerning adoption ofthe Environmental Protection Agency's Control Technique Guidelines for large appliance coating. This SIP Revision includes amendments to Regulation .06 under COMAR 26.11.19 Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes. The Notice of Proposed Action forthis SIP Revision was published in the Maryland Register on July 2, 2010. A public hearing was held on August 4,2010. The action was adopted on September24,2010. The Notice of Final Action was published on October 22, 2010 and the amendments became effective on November 1, 2010. All administrative procedures were properly followed throughout the adoption process. Ifyou have any questions concerninQl this SIP submittal, please feel free to call me at (410) 537-4187 or Mr. George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., Director ofthe Air and Radiation ManagementAdministration, at (410) 537-3255. Sincerely,

Robert M. Summers, Ph.D Acting Secretary RMS:dhr Enclosures .'

Recycled Paper www.mde.state.md.us TTY Users 1-800-735-2258 Via MarylandRclay Service
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harold Karp, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court of Queens County convicting defendant of the crimes of grand larceny in the second degree and of petit larceny, unanimously affirmed. The proof is sufficient to warrant a jury in finding that the defendant induced fourteen persons to part with money on the fraudulent promise of defendant that he would publish and distribute a telephone directory in which their advertisements would appear, and that defendant made the false representation with the intention of committing a theft. Irrespective of the promissory nature of the representation, as distinguished from one with respect to an existent fact, it was a larceny. (Penal Law, § 1290; *People ex reí. Gellis*V. *Sheriff,*251 N. Y. 33, 36-37; *Adams*v. *Gillig,*199 N. Y. 314; *People*v. *Sloane,*254 App. Div. 780, affd. 279 N. Y. 724.) Present —■ Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
**Exhibit 23**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-70345) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Option Plan, 1998 Stock Option Plan, and 1998 Supplemental Stock Option Plan of United Rentals, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8No. 333-133256) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Option Plan, and 1998 Supplemental Stock Option Plan of United Rentals, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-60458) pertaining to the 2001 Stock Plan of United Rentals, Inc., theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-139589) pertaining to the 2001 Comprehensive Stock Plan of United Rentals, Inc., the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-98567) pertaining to the United Rentals, Inc. 401(k) Investment Planand United Rentals, Inc. Acquisition Plan of United Rentals, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-162818) pertaining to the United Rentals, Inc. 401(k) Investment Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-113787)pertaining to the 2001 Senior Stock Plan of United Rentals, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-116882) pertaining to the Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of United Rentals, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8No. 333-166743) pertaining to the 2010 Long Term Incentive Plan of United Rentals, Inc., and the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-166214) of United Rentals, Inc. and in the related Prospectus for the registration of United Rentals,Inc. debt securities, shares of common stock, rights, shares of preferred stock, and warrants and United Rentals (North America), Inc. debt securities of our reports dated February 1, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statementsand schedule of United Rentals, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of United Rentals, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

New York, New York 

February 1, 2011
NO. 12-10-00360-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER § APPEAL FROM THE 420TH

OF C.B., § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

A JUVENILE § NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by Appellant, 

his “mother/legal guardian,” and his counsel. Because Appellant has met the requirements of 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), the motion is granted, and the appeal is 

dismissed. 

Opinion delivered December 8, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-98-17 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Friday, March 6, 1998)

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have announced the

assignment of Robert Hagar as a resident inspector at the Shearon Harris nuclear power plant

near New Hill, North Carolina.

Before joining the NRC, Mr. Hagar worked for 15 years at the Comanche Peak nuclear

power plant in Texas as a senior engineer, engineering supervisor, and project manager. Prior

to that, he worked for five years in reactor safety research. He joined the NRC in October 1997

as a project engineer in the NRC’s region office in Atlanta, Georgia, and is part of the agency’s

Resident Inspector Development Program. Mr. Hagar received a B.S. degree in Nuclear

Engineering from the University of Oklahoma and an M.S. degree in Nuclear Engineering from

Purdue University. Mr. Hagar also attended the Naval Nuclear Power School in Vallejo,

California.

Mr. Hagar joins NRC Senior Resident Inspector Joe Brady at the Harris plant. The NRC

inspectors at Harris can be reached at 919-362-0601.

#
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 10.6 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF MAHMUD HAQ





                                    AMENDMENT
                                    ---------

         Reference is made to the Employment Agreement dated as of December 9,
1997 by and between Compass International Services Corporation ("Compass") and
Mahmud U. Haq ("Employee") (the "Agreement").

         1.       The Agreement is hereby amended to change Employee's title
                  from President and Chief Operating Officer to Chief Executive
                  Officer. Accordingly, all references to "President" and/or
                  "Chief Operating Officer" are changed to read "Chief Executive
                  Officer".

         2.       The Agreement is hereby amended to increase Employee's Base
                  Salary (as defined in the Agreement) from $200,000 to $225,000
                  per annum, effective January 1, 1999.

         3.       Except as amended hereby, the Agreement remains in full force
                  and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the
6th day of December, 1998.


         MAHMUD U. HAQ                      COMPASS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES
                                            CORPORATION


         _______/S/______________         _____________/S/____________________
                                              By: