alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1201.55 Motions. ( a ) *Form.* All motions, except those made during a prehearing conference or a hearing, must be in writing. All motions must include a statement of the reasons supporting them. Written motions must be filed with the judge or the Board, as appropriate, and must be served upon all other parties in accordance with § 1201.26(b)(2) of this part. A party filing a motion for extension of time, a motion for postponement of a hearing, or any other procedural motion must first contact the other party to determine whether there is any objection to the motion, and must state in the motion whether the other party has an objection.
( b ) *Objection.* Unless the judge provides otherwise, any objection to a written motion must be filed within 10 days from the date of service of the motion. Judges, in their discretion, may grant or deny motions for extensions of time to file pleadings without providing any opportunity to respond to the motions.
( c ) *Motions for extension of time.* Motions for extension of time will be granted only on a showing of good cause.
( d ) *Motions for protective orders.* A motion for an order under 5 U.S.C. 1204(e)(1)(B) to protect a witness or other individual from harassment must be filed as early in the proceeding as practicable. The party seeking a protective order must include a concise statement of reasons justifying the motion, together with any relevant documentary evidence. An agency, other than the Office of Special Counsel, may not request such an order with respect to an investigation by the Special Counsel during the Special Counsel's investigation. An order issued under this paragraph may be enforced in the same manner as provided under subpart F for Board final decisions and orders.
[54 FR 53504, Dec. 29, 1989, as amended at 62 FR 17045, Apr. 9, 1997]
### §959. Study of coordination of Federal and State activities; report

(a) The Secretary shall make a study to determine the best manner to coordinate Federal and State activities in the field of coal or other mine health and safety so as to achieve (1) maximum health and safety protection for miners, (2) an avoidance of duplication of effort, (3) maximum effectiveness, (4) a reduction of delay to a minimum, and (5) most effective use of Federal inspectors.

(b) The Secretary shall make a report of the results of his study to the Congress as soon as practicable after December 30, 1969.

(Pub. L. 91–173, title V, §512, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 804; Pub. L. 95–164, title III, §303(g), Nov. 9, 1977, 91 Stat. 1321.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1977—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 95–164 inserted reference to mines other than coal mines.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1977 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–164 effective 120 days after Nov. 9, 1977, except as otherwise provided, see section 307 of Pub. L. 95–164, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 18, 2014

t0611 

# Order

Clerk June 18, 2014

148446

MICHAEL WENNERS, DAVID CROSS and

S ALLY CROSS,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 148446

COA: 314938

Washtenaw CC: 12

- 001197

- CH

MATTHEW D. CHISOLM and AMY (VOGEL)

CHISOLM,

Defendants

- Appellants,

and

CLAUDIA M. WEBB and MARY J. POIRER,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 27, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for

consideration as on leave granted. The Court of Appeals shall consider the defendant’s

motion for summary disposition in light of MCR 2.605.
### §66a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 66a was editorially reclassified as section 4578 of this title.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No.02-060 May 20, 2002 

NRC TASK FORCE TO ASSESS LESSONS LEARNED 

FROM DAVIS-BESSE REACTOR VESSEL HEAD DEGRADATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Executive Director for Operations has assigned an

independent task force to assess lessons-learned related to the degradation of the reactor vessel head at

the Davis-Besse nuclear power plant in Ohio.

The Task Force will conduct an independent evaluation of the NRC staff’s regulatory processes

related to assuring reactor vessel head integrity in order to identify and recommend areas of

improvement applicable to the NRC and/or the industry. The scope of the task force effort will

include the following five areas: reactor oversight process issues, regulatory process issues, research

activities, applicable practices used in the international community, and the NRC’s generic issue

process. 

The task force will be headed by Arthur T. Howell, III, Director of the Division of Reactor

Safety, in NRC’s Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas, and will include specialists from Region IV as

well as the NRC’s Region II Office in Atlanta, Georgia, the Office of Nuclear Material Safety &

Safeguards, the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, and the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. 

Representatives from the state of Ohio will also have an active role in the task force review activities.

The task force will address the following areas:

a. Reactor Oversight Process Issues - evaluate the underlying causes of the Davis-Besse

reactor vessel head degradation, and assess whether enhancements to the NRC’s reactor

oversight process are warranted.

b. Regulatory Process Issues - evaluate regulations, the licensing review process, and other

NRC regulatory processes such as generic communications to determine whether

enhancements are warranted.

c. Research Activities - determine whether there are any issues associated with the NRC

process of using reactor operating experience and the results of various research

programs, including research performed by NRC, requiring improvement.
d. International Practices - identify and evaluate foreign regulatory practices related to

reactor vessel head degradation to possibly enhance NRC programs and practices.

e. Generic Issue Process - evaluate the NRC process for identifying and responding to

emerging technical issues, including the implementation of short-term and long-term

follow-on efforts by the licensee and NRC.

The task force is expected to complete the review by early September. It will then prepare a

written report containing conclusions, findings and recommendations that will be made public.

###
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT******AUDITORS********

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statements of United Rentals, Inc. (Form S-3 No.’s 333-41419-99, 333-70151, 333-70255, 333-64463, 333-86197 and 333-57916, and Form S-4  No. 333-87644), the Registration Statement of United Rentals, Inc. (Form S-8 No.333-70345) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Option Plan, 1998 Stock Option Plan, and 1998 Supplemental Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement of United Rentals, Inc. (Form S-8 No. 333-60458) pertaining to the 2001 Stock Plan, the RegistrationStatements of United Rentals, Inc. (Form S-8 No.’s 333-74091 and 333-87903) pertaining to the options outstanding in connection with the 1997 Performance Award Plan of U.S. Rentals assumed pursuant to the merger with U.S. Rentals and theRegistration Statements of United Rentals, Inc. (Form S-8 No.’s 333-39770 and 333-98567) pertaining to the United Rentals, Inc. 401(k) Investment Plan and United Rentals, Inc. Acquisition Plan, of our report dated February 20, 2003 with respectto the consolidated financial statements and schedules of United Rentals, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 

/S/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

MetroPark, New Jersey 

June 23, 2003
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-05-0020 - Final Rule: Medical Use of Byproduct Material - Recognition of Specialty Boards (RIN 3150-AH19)

Accession Number: ML041050836

Date Released: Thursday, January 27, 2005

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML050070077 - SECY-05-0020 - Final Rule:  Medical Use of Byproduct Material - Recognition of Specialty Boards (RIN 3150-AH19) (11 page(s), 1/19/2005)
    - ML032820570 - SRM-SECY-03-0145 - "Proposed Rule: Medical Use of Byproduct Material - Recognition of Specialty Boards." (3 page(s), 10/9/2003)
    - ML050070084 - SECY-05-0020-Attachment 2 - Federal Register Notice: Medical Use of Byproduct Material Recognition of Specialty Boards (122 page(s), 1/19/2005)
    - ML042740713 - Petition for Rulemaking of the Organization of Agreement States (OAS) requests the NRC to amend sections of Part 35, To define and specify the minimum number of classroom and laboratory training hours for the Authorized Nuclear Pharmacist and others. (51 page(s), 9/3/2004)
    - ML050070116 - SECY-05-0020-Attachment 4 - Regulatory Analysis Final Rule 10 CFR Part 35 - Recognition of Specialty Boards (46 page(s), 1/19/2005)
    - ML041280569 - SECY-05-0020 - Attachment 5 - Submission of Federal Rules Under the Congressional Review Act (5 page(s), 1/19/2005)
    - ML050070122 - SECY-05-0020 - Letter to Petitoners (2 page(s), 1/19/2005)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-03-015 March 26, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO MEET WITH OFFICIALS FROM KEWAUNEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION 

TO DISCUSS SAFETY PERFORMANCE 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials from the Kewaunee

Nuclear Power Station on Wenesday, April 2, to discuss the results of NRC’s annual assessment of the

plant’s safety performance. The plant, managed by Nuclear Management Company, is located in

Kewaunee, Wisconsin.

The meeting will be held at 5 p.m. at the Carlton Town Hall, N1296 Town Hall Road, in

Kewaunee. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be available before

the conclusion of the meeting for questions and comments from the public.

A letter from the NRC to the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Station addresses plant safety

performance during the previous year and forms the basis for the meeting discussions. The letter is

available from Region III Public Affairs Office and on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/listofasmrpt.html

According to the letter, overall, Kewuanee operated in a manner that preserved public health

and safety. The letter states that NRC inspectors identified one issue of low to moderate safety

significance involving the lack of a fixed fire protection system in an area containing important safety

equipment. If the equipment were to be damaged by fire, the damage could increase the complexity of

actions needed to safely shut down the reactor. The utility has taken compensatory measures –

increased surveillance in the affected area – and plans to install a fixed fire protection system. The

inspection report is on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html

The letter states that in addition to baseline inspections, the NRC will conduct a supplemental

inspection to make sure the licensee has properly addressed all the issues associated with the fire

protection finding.

In addition, the letter notes: "As you are aware, since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001,

the NRC has issued several Orders and threat advisories to enhance security capabilities and improve guard

force readiness. We have conducted inspections to review your implementation of these requirements and

have monitored your actions in response to changing threat advisories. For calendar Year 2003, we plan
to continue these inspections and conduct portions of the security baseline inspection program, as well as

perform additional inspections to evaluate your compliance with new requirements that may be ordered."

Current performance information for Kewuanee is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/kewa_2002q4.pdf

###
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of LJ International Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yu
Chuan Yih, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                              /s/ YU CHUAN YIH
                                              -----------------------------
                                              Yu Chuan Yih
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              August 22, 2002
January 15, 2010 

Dear Owner/Resident: 

A Lead Based Paint (LBP) assessment was recently performed on your property by the 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as part of the Omaha Lead Superfund Site 

investigation. The purpose of this assessment is to determine whether a significant quantity of 

lead based paint is present on the exterior surface of structures, where deteriorating paint 

conditions (peeling, flaking, cracking, etc.) exist that might increase lead concentrations in the 

yard above acceptable levels. 

As requested, enclosed are the LBP assessment sheets for 3809 MASON ST along with a 

LBP Fact Sheet. The EPA is currently developing paint stabilization eligibility criteria and at 

this time can not identify which homes will ultimately be eligible for EPA-funded paint 

stabilization. At present, paint stabilization is being offered at only those households with the 

most severe LPB problems, particularly where children under the age of 7 reside. The EPA 

stresses the importance of maintaining painted surfaces where any amount of LBP is present. 

The LBP Fact Sheet provides information pertaining to the EPA’s Exterior LBP Response 

Program. Once the eligibility criterion is finalized (and if your property qualifies) a 

representative from EPA or the Omaha Lead Hazard Control Program (LHCP) will contact you 

to arrange for paint stabilization at your property. 

Exposure to lead contamination can adversely affect the development and behavior of 

young children. If you have children less than seven years of age living in your home, we 

strongly recommend that you contact your doctor or the Douglas County Health Department at 

(402) 444-7825 and arrange to have their blood tested. 

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the EPA Public Information Center 

at (402) 731-3045. 

Sincerely, 

Steve M Langum 

Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp. 6601 College Blvd. Overland Park, KS 66211 USA Telephone: 913-458-2900 
Omaha Lead Site LBP Assessment 

Sample Number Lead Loading StructuretFeature Substrate Color Deteriorated 

(Window, siding,porch, etc.) (Wood, concrete, etc.) Area 

H --- P - 12 - 21356 ftz 

--5- P 21356 A c .Sd,,lsid L A P 

--- -P--21356 rng/cm' ft' 
Arrow 

Address: 3809 MASON ST 

Omaha Lead Site NOF~~ 

.- k Site Sketch I 

LBP Assessment 

Phone: H: ALT: I I l l
 I I C 1 

Plan View - lndicate number of stories and perimeter dimensions of structure 


Indicate reaions of deterioration and describe 


(Deterioratton could include surfaces that are worn due to friction. checking. cracking and flaking, allgatoring, blisteringandlor peeiing)
§ 1630.5 Granting access to a designated individual. ( a ) An individual who wishes to have a person of his or her choosing review a record or obtain a copy of a record from the Board or the TSP record keeper shall submit a signed statement authorizing the disclosure of his or her record before the record will be disclosed. The authorization shall be maintained with the record.
( b ) The Board or the TSP record keeper will honor any Privacy Act request (e.g., a request to have access or to amend a record) which is accompanied by a valid power of attorney from the subject of the record.
[55 FR 18852, May 7, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 26409, May 20, 1994; 64 FR 67694, Dec. 3, 1999]
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. William Archer, as County Treasurer of the County of Westchester, Respondent, v. The City of Yonkers, and Joseph Miller, as Comptroller of the City of Yonkers, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Can-, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 15, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), International Association of Association Management Companies, Inc. (“IAAMC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: International Association of Association Management Companies, Inc., Westmont, IL. The nature and scope of IAAMC's standards development activities are: Internal quality systems and best practices for association management companies.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-23772  Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 64913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27417]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, December 20, 2018.

PLACE: The meeting will be held at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F 
Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    Commissioner Jackson, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session.
    The subject matters of the closed meeting will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; 
please contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of the Secretary at 
(202) 551-5400.

    Dated: December 13, 2018.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-27417 Filed 12-14-18; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### § 1315.15 Grant recipients.

Recipients of Federal assistance may pay interest penalties if so specified in their contracts with contractors. However, obligations to pay such interest penalties will not be obligations of the United States. Federal funds may not be used for this purpose, nor may interest penalties be used to meet matching requirements of federally assisted programs.