alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 24.3 Bills and accounts; receipts. ( a ) Any bill or account for money due the United States shall be rendered by an authorized Customs officer or employee on an official form.
( b ) A receipt for the payment of estimated Customs duties, taxes, fees, and interest, if applicable, shall be provided a payer at the time of payment if he furnishes with his payment an additional copy of the documentation submitted in support of the payment. The appropriate Customs official shall validate the additional copy as paid and return it to the payer. Otherwise, a copy of the document filed by the payer and the payer's cancelled check shall constitute evidence of payment.
( c ) A copy of a Customs bill validated as paid will not normally be provided a payer. If a bill is paid by check, the copy of the Customs bill identified as “Payer's Copy” and the payer's cancelled check shall constitute evidence of such payment to Customs. Should a payer desire evidence of receipt, both the “U.S. Customs Service Copy” and the “Payer's Copy” of the bill and, in the case of payments by mail, a stamped, self-addressed envelope, shall be submitted. The “Payer's Copy” of the bill shall then be marked paid by the appropriate Customs official and returned to the payer.
( d ) Every payment which is not made in person shall be accompanied by the original bill or by a communication containing sufficient information to identify the account or accounts to which it is to be applied.
( e ) Except for bills resulting from dishonored payments (*e.g.,* a check or Automated Clearinghouse (ACH) transaction), all other bills for duties, taxes, fees, interest, or other charges are due and payable within 30 days of the date of the issuance of the bill. Bills resulting from dishonored payments are due and payable within 15 days of the date of the issuance of the bill.
[28 FR 14808, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 74-73, 39 FR 7782, Feb. 28, 1974; T.D. 79-221, 44 FR 46813, Aug. 9, 1979; T.D. 86-178, 51 FR 34959, Oct. 1, 1986; T.D. 99-75, 64 FR 56437, Oct. 20, 1999; 88 FR 72680, Oct. 23, 2023]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 27, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24047]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
obtain copies of agreements by contacting the Commission's Office of 
Agreements at 202-523-5793 or via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fa8e889b9e9f9b949b9683899389ba9c9799d49d958c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b3c7c1d2d7d6d2ddd2dfcac0dac0f3d5ded09dd4dcc5">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Interested parties may submit comments on an agreement to the 
Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within 10 
days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register.
    Agreement No.: 011764-001.
    Title: Zim/Norasia/CSAV Slot Exchange Agreement.
    Parties: Zim Integrated Shipping Services, Ltd.; Norasia Container 
Lines Limited and Compania Sud Americana de Vapores S.A.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell; 1850 M 
Street, NW., Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment revises Zim's corporate name.

    Dated: October 22, 2004.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Karen V. Gregory,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-24047 Filed 10-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Ovella Locks, on Behalf of Herself and Helen Locks, an Infant, Respondent, against Nassau Construction Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, and American Bitumnals Company et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Deyo and Santry, JJ.
#### Charles F. Plage, as Administrator of the Estate of Martha M. Plage, Deceased, Respondent, v. Annie P. Buchanan et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No.: 20-20185-CR-WILLIAMS(s)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JOE LEWIS MCHOMES,

Defendant.

______________________________ /

UNITED STATES’ MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE 

PURSUANT TO UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINE SECTION 5K1.1

The United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States 

Attorney, respectfully requests that this Court reduce the sentence of the defendant Joe Lewis 

McHomes, pursuant to United States Sentencing Guideline Section 5K1.1, and states:

On September 21, 2022, pursuant to a Plea Agreement, the defendant Joe McHomes pled 

guilty to Count 1 of the Superseding Indictment, which charged him with conspiracy to commit 

mail fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1341 and 1346, and wire fraud, in 

violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 1346; all in violation of Title 18, 

United States Code, Section 1349.

Probation computes McHomes’ total offense as 20, and his criminal history category as I. 

(See PSI (DE 134) at pp. 11-13, ¶¶ 40-55.) Based on these findings, McHomes’ advisory 

guideline range of imprisonment is 33 to 41 months. (Id. at p. 21, ¶ 87.)

McHomes provided substantial assistance to the United States in connection with the 

investigation and prosecution of his co-defendant, Mario De La Torre; including by providing 

information to federal agents, and agreeing to testify at the trial of De La Torre. Therefore, 

Case 1:20-cr-20185-KMW Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2024 Page 1 of 2
2

pursuant to United States Sentencing Guideline Section 5K1.1, the United States moves for a 

reduction of McHomes’s term of imprisonment by 1/3 of the low end of his advisory guideline 

range of imprisonment. Based on McHomes’ advisory guideline range of imprisonment of 33 to 

41 months, the government requests a reduction of 11 months, and a sentence of 22 months’ 

imprisonment.

WHEREFORE, the United States requests that the Court reduce Joe Lewis McHomes’

term of imprisonment by 1/3 of the low end of his advisory guideline range of imprisonment as 

determined by the Court.

Respectfully submitted,

MARKENZY LAPOINTE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: Dwayne Williams

DWAYNE E. WILLIAMS

Assistant United States Attorney

Florida Bar No. 0125199

99 Northeast 4th Street

Miami, Florida 33132-2111

Tel: (305) 961-9163

Fax: (305) 530-6168

Dwayne.Williams@usdoj.gov

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing United States’ Motion 

for Reduction of Sentence was filed with the Clerk of the Court, via CM/ECF, this 18th day of June

2024.

Dwayne Williams

DWAYNE E. WILLIAMS

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 1:20-cr-20185-KMW Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2024 Page 2 of 2
### SUBCHAPTER IV—BUREAU OF ENGRAVING AND PRINTING
Input and Output Files for the Full-Scale Modeling for 

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment for Coal Combustion Residuals

At the time of the proposed rule, the ftp site ftp://ftp.epa.gov/coal-combustion-residues contained 

the following files: 

 CCW.zip -- 

 CCW_GW_Modeling_System -- 

 CCR_Inputs_Outputs_7_14_2010.zip -- 

For the final rule, EPA is placing nine additional input and output files onto the FTP site. These 

new input and output files, in conjunction with the revised risk assessment available in the docket, 

are meant to increase the transparency of the risk assessment, and allow interested stakeholders to 

duplicate EPA’s results. The new files include the following: 

 LF_Inputs_Chem_Tables.zip – 171 MB

 SI_Inputs_Chem_Tables (1 of 2).zip – 480 MB

 SI_Inputs_Chem_Tables (2 of 2).zip – 134 MB

 LF_Outputs_GW_HH.zip – 35.6 MB

 LF_Outputs_SW_Eco.zip – 9.28 MB 

 LF_Outputs_SW_HH.zip – 32.5 MB

 SI_Outputs_GW_HH.zip – 217 MB 

 SI_Outputs_SW_Eco.zip – 62.8 MB

 SI_Outputs_SW_HH.zip – 134 MB

The first three files contain the inputs used in each iteration of the probabilistic analysis. Users will 

note that all landfill inputs have been included in a single file (“LF_Inputs_Chem_Tables.zip”), 

whereas surface impoundment inputs are broken into two files [“SI_Inputs_Chem_Tables (1 of 2)” 

and “SI_Inputs_Chem_Tables (2 of 2).zip”] due to the larger file size, which results from the inputs 

for the additional nine constituents modeled for these units. 

The remaining six files contain the outputs generated from each iteration. Output files are denoted 

with the following abbreviations: landfill (LF), surface impoundment (SI), ground water (GW), 

surface water (SW), human health risk (HH), and ecological risk (Eco). For each file, results for all 

constituents modeled for that scenario are included. 

For questions about these files, please contact Jason Mills of the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery (ORCR), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW 

(5305P), Washington, DC 20460. 

Email: mills.jason@epa.gov 

Phone: (703) 305-9091
#### § 172.43 Waiver of statute of limitations.

The deciding Customs official always reserves the right to require a waiver of the statute of limitations executed by the charged party or parties as a condition precedent before accepting a supplemental petition in any case in which less than one year remains before the statute will be available as a defense to all or part of that case.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

Breck Henderson (Phone: 817-860-8128, E-mail: bwh@nrc.gov)

RIV: 99-37

November 23, 1999

NRC TO HOLD “ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION” AT PUBLIC MEETING

NOVEMBER 30 IN AUBURN ON NEW REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROGRAM

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with invited community leaders,

industry representatives and members of public interest groups for a “roundtable” discussion of

the agency’s new reactor oversight process for the Cooper Nuclear Station during a public

meeting on Tuesday, November 30.

The meeting will be at 7 p.m. at the Arbor Manor Inn, 1617 Central Ave., Auburn,

Nebraska. The roundtable discussion portion of the meeting will be open to public observation.

Members of the general public will have an opportunity to present their views to NRC officials

afterward.

The Cooper Nuclear Station, operated by Nebraska Public Power District, is one of 13

plants at nine sites participating in a pilot program which began June 1 to test and adjust the

new oversight process. A public meeting is planned for each plant site. Following a several

month trial to verify the new program and determine if revisions are needed, the process is

expected to be implemented next year at all 103 commercial nuclear power reactors.

The NRC is seeking input from the public on its new reactor oversight process,

including the inspection and assessment programs to maintain safety, improve public

confidence, increase efficiency and effectiveness and reduce unnecessary regulatory burden.

The changes reflect, in part, improvements in nuclear power plant safety performance over the

past 20 years. Plants that perform well generally will have less regulatory oversight than plants

that have problems.

The pilot plant sites are: (1) Salem 1 and 2, near Wilmington, Delaware, operated by

Public Service Electric & Gas; (2) Hope Creek near Wilmington, Delaware, operated by Public

Service Electric & Gas; (3) Fitzpatrick, near Oswego, New York, operated by the Power

Authority of the State of New York; (4) Shearon Harris, near Raleigh, North Carolina, operated

by Carolina Power & Light Co.; (5) Sequoyah 1 and 2, near Chattanooga, Tennessee, operated

by the Tennessee Valley Authority; (6) Prairie Island 1 and 2, near Minneapolis, Minnesota,

operated by Northern States Power Co.; (7) Quad Cities 1 and 2, near Moline, Illinois, operated

by Commonwealth Edison Co.; (8) Ft. Calhoun, near Omaha, Nebraska, operated by the

Omaha Public Power District; and (9) Cooper, near Nebraska City, Nebraska, operated by the

Nebraska Public Power District.
Information on the new oversight program, including a list of questions that will be

discussed at the roundtable meeting, is available on the NRC website at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/index.html.

##
### SUBCHAPTER IV—PERSONNEL APPEALS BOARD
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4(d)

                                 BYLAW AMENDMENT

                            ADDITION TO ARTICLE VIII

Section 14. Prohibited Indemnification. Notwithstanding anything in this Article
VIII to the contrary, the Corporation shall not indemnify any person against any
expense, penalties, payments or judgments incurred as the result of an
administrative proceeding or civil action instituted by an appropriate federal
banking regulatory agency, which indemnification would result in a prohibited
indemnification payment as defined by applicable statute or regulation.



                                       16
### §59d. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 59d was editorially reclassified as section 5346 of this title.
§ 1600.37 Notice. The TSP record keeper shall furnish all new employees and all rehired employees covered by the automatic enrollment program, and all employees described in paragraph (c) of § 1600.34, covered by the automatic enrollment program a notice that accurately describes: ( a ) That default employee contributions equal to 5 percent of the employee's basic pay will be deducted from the employee's pay and contributed to the employee's traditional TSP balance on the employee's behalf if the employee does not make an affirmative contribution election;
( b ) The employee's right to elect to not have default employee contributions made to the TSP on the employee's behalf, to elect to have a different percentage or amount of basic pay contributed to the TSP, or to make Roth contributions;
( c ) The TSP core fund in which the default employee and agency contributions will be invested unless the employee makes an investment election;
( d ) The employee's ability (or inability) to request a refund of any default employee contributions (adjusted for allocable gains and losses) and the procedure to request such a refund; and
( e ) That an investment in any fund other than the G Fund is made at the employee's risk, that the employee is not protected by the United States Government or the Board against any loss on the investment, and that neither the United States Government nor the Board guarantees any return on the investment.
[75 FR 43800, July 27, 2010, as amended at 77 FR 26424, May 4, 2012; 80 FR 52173, Aug. 28, 2015; 82 FR 60103, Dec. 19, 2017; 85 FR 57666, Sept. 16, 2020; 87 FR 31673, May 24, 2022]
|  |
|--|

|  |  |
|--|--|

| ** ** |
|------------|

|   | ****MIBURN(Mississippi Burning)**** 
948 pages

Summary of the investigation of the 1964 murder of three civil rights workers in Mississippi.

**Part 01**
**Part 02**
**Part 03**
**Part 04**
**Part 05**
**Part 06**
**Part 07**
**Part 08**
**Part 09**

Introduction
Reading Room Index - A   B   C   D   E    F   G- H   I    J    K   L   M   N   -O   P   Q   R   S   T   U-V   W   X   Y   Z   
Electronic Reading Room
- Alphabetical Listing- Espionage-Famous Persons-Gangster Era- Historical Interest- Unusual Phenomena-Violent CrimeFBI              File Fact Sheet FOIA Request Instructions- FOIA Request Form - Privacy Waiver and Certificate of Identity Form Privacy Act Instructions- Privacy Act Request FormDOJ              Reference GuideU.S.              DOJ FOIASearch
All of these publications are in PDF (Portable Document Format). To view them you will need to have the Adobe Acrobat Reader plug-in installed on your computer. The Reader can be downloaded at no cost from Adobe's site on the World Wide Web.   If you have difficulty accessing any material on this site because of a disability, please contact us in writing or via telephone and we will work with you to make the information available.

Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Section    202-324-5520 |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### In re David J. ANDERSON.

No. 02-1333.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 24, 2002.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. RApp. P. 42(b).
§ 1201.134 Deciding official; filing stay request; serving documents on parties. ( a ) *Request to stay personnel action.* Under 5 U.S.C. 1214(b)(1), the Special Counsel may seek to stay a personnel action if the Special Counsel determines that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the action was taken or will be taken as a result of a prohibited personnel practice.
( b ) *Deciding official.* Any member of the Board may delegate to an administrative law judge the authority to decide a Special Counsel request for an initial stay. The Board may delegate to a member of the Board the authority to rule on any matter related to a stay that has been granted to the Special Counsel, including a motion for extension or termination of the stay.
( c ) *Place of filing.* A Special Counsel stay request must be filed with the Clerk of the Board.
( d ) *Initial filing and service.* The Special Counsel must file a copy of the request, together with numbered and tabbed exhibits or attachments, if any, and a certificate of service listing the respondent agency or the agency's representative. The certificate of service must show the last known address, telephone number, and facsimile number of the agency or its representative. The Special Counsel must serve a copy of the request on the agency or its representative, as shown on the certificate of service.
( e ) *Subsequent filings and service.* Each party must serve on every other party or the party's representative one copy of each of its pleadings, as defined by § 1201.4(b). A certificate of service describing how and when service was made must accompany each pleading. Each party is responsible for notifying the Board and the other parties in writing of any change in name, address, telephone number, or facsimile number of the party or the party's representative.
[62 FR 48451, Sept. 16, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 42686, Aug. 11, 1998; 68 FR 59863, Oct. 20, 2003; 69 FR 57630, Sept. 27, 2004; 73 FR 10130, Feb. 26, 2008; 77 FR 62370, Oct. 12, 2012]
§ 1201.156 Time for processing appeals involving allegations of discrimination. ( a ) *Issue raised in appeal.* When an appellant alleges prohibited discrimination in the appeal, the judge will decide both the issue of discrimination and the appealable action within 120 days after the appeal is filed.
( b ) *Issue not raised in appeal.* When an appellant has not alleged prohibited discrimination in the appeal, but has raised the issue later in the proceeding, the judge will decide both the issue of discrimination and the appealable action within 120 days after the issue is raised.
( c ) *Discrimination issue remanded to agency.* When the judge remands an issue of discrimination to the agency, adjudication will be completed within 120 days after the agency completes its action and returns the case to the Board.
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 15, 2005



By:

/s/ William V. CareyWilliam V. CareyChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer