alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)
       OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Penwest
Pharmaceuticals Co. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Jennifer L. Good, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 9, 2004      /s/ Jennifer L. Good
                          ----------------------------------
                          Jennifer L. Good
                          Sr. Vice President,Finance and Chief Financial Officer
                          (Chief Financial Officer)
### §28c. Length and termination of deferment

The period for which said deferment may be granted shall end when the conditions justifying deferment have been removed: Provided, That the initial period shall not exceed one year but may be renewed for a further period of one year if justifiable conditions exist: Provided further, That the relief available under sections 28b to 28e of this title is in addition to any relief available under any other Act of Congress with respect to mining claims.

(June 21, 1949, ch. 232, §2, 63 Stat. 215.)
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 762 

To provide the National Credit Union Administration Board flexibility to 

increase Federal credit union loan maturities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 16, 2021 

Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina (for himself and Ms. CORTEZ MASTO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide the National Credit Union Administration Board 

flexibility to increase Federal credit union loan maturities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expanding Access to 

5 Lending Options Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. POWERS OF FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS. 

7 Section 107(5) of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 

8 U.S.C. 1757(5)) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 762 IS

1 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), 

2 by inserting ‘‘or up to a term of 20 years as the 

3 Board may allow, in regulations’’ after ‘‘15 years’’; 

4 and 

5 (2) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking ‘‘or will 

6 be the principal residence of a credit union member, 

7 and which is’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393), the Boise and Payette National Forests' Southwest Idaho Resource Advisory Committee will conduct a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

# DATES:

Wednesday, February 18, 2004, beginning at 10:30 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Idaho Counties Risk Management Program Building, 3100 South Vista Avenue, Boise, Idaho.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Randy Swick, Designated Federal Officer, at (208) 634-0401 or e-mail                         *rswick@fs.fed.us*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda topics will include review and approval of project proposals, and is an open public forum.

Dated: January 29, 2004.

Mark J. Madrid,

Forest Supervisor, Payette National Forest.

[FR Doc. 04-2401  Filed 2-3-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
**Exhibit 12.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| I, Miguel   Núñez Sfeir, certify that: |
|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                             |
| 1.                                               | I have   reviewed this amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of   Distribución y Servicio D&S S.A.; |
|                                             |   |
| 2.                                               | Based on my   knowledge, this amendment No. 1 to the annual report does not contain any   untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact   necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under   which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period   covered by this report. |
#### § 1210.14 Sanctions for failure to meet deadlines.

Section 1201.43 of this chapter, which allows administrative judges to impose sanctions on parties that do not comply with orders or do not file pleadings in a timely fashion, shall apply to any appeal covered by this part. Strict enforcement of deadlines will be required to meet the 21-day deadline for issuance of a decision by the administrative judge.
### §2713. Trial of ownership of property

Not later than twenty days before the return day of a warrant issued under section 2712 of this title, the party whose property is attached, on notice to the United States Attorney, may file a plea in abatement, denying the allegations of the affidavit, or denying ownership in the defendant of the property attached. The court, upon application of either party, shall order a trial by jury of the issues. Where the parties, by consent, waive a trial by jury, the court shall decide the issues. A party claiming ownership of the property attached and seeking its return is limited to the remedy afforded by this section, but his right to an action of trespass, or other action for damages, is not impaired.

(Added Pub. L. 86–682, §9, Sept. 2, 1960, 74 Stat. 707.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was derived from R.S. §927, which was originally classified to section 740 of former Title 28. Following the general revision and enactment of Title 28 by act June 25, 1948, R.S. §927 was reclassified to section 840 of Title 39. R.S. §927 was repealed by section 12(c) of Pub. L. 86–682 (section 1 of which revised and enacted Title 39), and reenacted by section 9 thereof as section 2713 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Sept. 1, 1960, see section 11 of Pub. L. 86–682, 74 Stat. 708.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-02-0043 - Proposed Rule: Geological & Seismological Characteristics for the Siting & Design of Dry Cask Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations & Monitored Retrievable Storage Installations  -10 CFR Part 72

Accession Number: ML020440010

Date Released: Tuesday, June 18, 2002

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML020440023 - SECY-02-0043 -  "Proposed Rule:  Geological and Seismological Characteristics For the Siting and Design of Dry Cask Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations and Monitored Retrievable Storage Installations - 10 CFR Part 72" (7 page(s), 3/13/2002)
    - ML013230314 - SRM-SECY-01-0178 - Modified Rulemaking Plan: 10 CFR Part 72--"Geological and Seismological Characteristics for Siting and Design of Dry Cask Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations" (1 page(s), 11/19/2001)
    - ML020440037 - SECY-02-0043-Attachment 2-Federal Register Notice - Proposed Rule:  Geological & Seismological Characteristics For the Siting & Design of Dry Cask Independ. Spent. Fuel Storage Installations & Monitored Retrievable Storage Installations - 10 CFR Part 72 (42 page(s), 3/13/2002)
    - ML020440044 - SECY-02-0043-Attachment 3: Regulatory Analysis - Geological and Seismological Characteristics for Siting & Design of Dry Cask Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations and Monitored Retrievable Storage Installations (26 page(s), 3/13/2002)
    - ML020440083 - SECY-02-0043-Attachment 4: Environmental Assessment re:  Geological and Seismological Characteristics for Siting & Design of Dry Cask Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations and Monitored Retrievable Stor. Installations (22 page(s), 3/13/2002)
    - ML020430357 - SECY-02-0043-Attachment 5: Draft Regulatory Guide DG-3021 Site Evaluations and Determination of Design Earthquake Ground Motion for Seismic Design of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations and Monitored Retrievable Storage Installations, March 2002 (56 page(s), 2/12/2002)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa4@nrc.gov

No. IV-03-038 September 10, 2003

CONTACT: Victor Dricks

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC PROPOSES $3,000 FINE AGAINST

PATTERSON WIRELINE OF TRINIDAD, CO 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $3,000 fine against Patterson

Wireline of Trinidad, Colorado, for two deliberate violations of NRC radiation safety requirements.

The company is licensed by the NRC to use well-logging devices with sealed radioactive

material to obtain information about underground rock formations and the likely presence and amounts

of gas and oil.

During a routine inspection at two temporary job sites in Alaska, conducted on November 13 of

last year, an NRC inspector observed that the logging supervisor and the supervisor’s assistant were

not wearing personal dosimeter devices as required by NRC regulations. The inspector also saw that

the truck, which was used to transport logging devices, was not labeled with radioactive placards as

required by regulations.

The NRC also determined that the violations were deliberate. The logging supervisor failed to

wear a dosimeter and to properly label the truck even after having discussed these requirements with

the NRC inspector at a previous job site on the same day. The NRC-licensed well-logging device was

only used at the second job site.

In addition to the proposed fine against the company, the NRC issued a Notice of Violation to

the logging supervisor for deliberately violating the NRC requirements.

In his letter to the company, the NRC’s Region IV Acting Regional Administrator Thomas P.

Gwynn emphasized that these violations are significant “because they were caused by deliberate

misconduct.” He said, “The NRC must be able to rely on its licensees and their employees to conduct

activities in compliance with NRC requirements.”

The company’s corrective actions include discussing this incident with company well-loggers

to emphasize the importance of wearing dosimetry devices, labeling vehicles with appropriate signs,

complying with radiation safety requirements and reinforcing these requirements through the use of

bonuses.
The company has until October 9 to either pay the fine or to protest it. If the fine is protested

and subsequently imposed by the NRC staff, the company may request a hearing.

The letter to the company is available from the Region IV Office of Public Affairs and will be

online at: http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/regulatory/enforcement/current.html#materials . The

inspection report will be viewable at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html by

entering accession number ML031560477. Assistance in using the web-based document collection is

available by calling the NRC Public Document Room at 800-397-4209.

###
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTechnology benefits and ground test facilities for high-speed civil transport developmentThe advanced technology base necessary for successful twenty-first century High-Speed Civil Transport (HSCT) aircraft will require extensive ground testing in aerodynamics, propulsion, acoustics, structures, materials, and other disciplines. This paper analyzes the benefits of advanced technology application to HSCT concepts, addresses the adequacy of existing groundbased test facilities, and explores the need for new facilities required to support HSCT development. A substantial amount of HSCT-related ground testing can be accomplished in existing facilities. The HSCT development effort could also benefit significantly from some new facilities initially conceived for testing in other aeronautical research areas. A new structures testing facility is identified as critically needed to insure timely technology maturation.Document ID19930006601Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWinston, Matthew M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Shields, Elwood M.*(Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Co. Hampton, VA., United States)*Morris, Shelby J., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1992Subject CategoryResearch And Support Facilities (Air)Report/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107670NAS 1.15:107670Accession Number93N15790Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-69-20-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930006601.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 182.31 Right to make post-importation claim for preferential tariff treatment and refund duties.

Notwithstanding any other available remedy, where a good would have qualified as an originating good when it was imported into the United States but no claim for preferential tariff treatment was made, the importer of that good may file a claim for a refund of any excess customs duties at any time within one year after the date of importation of the good in accordance with 19 U.S.C. 1520(d) and the procedures set forth in § 182.32. Unless the importer fails to comply with the applicable requirements in this part, CBP may refund any excess customs duties by liquidation or reliquidation of the entry covering the good in accordance with § 182.33.

[CBP Dec. 21-10, 86 FR 35586, July 6, 2021]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Joseph Rosino, Appellant.

*Murder—instructions as to duty to trespasser.*

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court of Nassau county, rendered on the 10th day of June, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury convicting him of murder in the second degree.

Per Curiam:

An examination of the proofs leads to the view that defendant had a fair trial, and that the verdict of conviction is supported by the testimony. No error appears in the court’s rulings as to evidence. His charge was a correct statement of the law as to such a homicide. The reversal in *People*v. *Tomlins*(213 N. Y. 240), rendered over two years after this trial, moves appellant’s counsel now to urge that as this shooting was in defendant’s own apartment the court should have told the jury that one so attacked in his home had the right to stand his ground. No question of the duty to retreat arose on the trial, or was touched upon in the charge. The court correctly held that one has no right to attack for the purpose of self-defense until he has done everything in his power to avoid its necessity. He must show that there was reasonable ground for him to believe he was in great peril, and that no other safe means of escape was open to him. In the absence of requests for further instructions, we think this gave the jury the proper rule as to shooting an assailant in the situation which the evidence disclosed. The judgment of conviction should be affirmed. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Nassau county affirmed.
#### § 1620.31 Definition.

As used in this subpart, *move* means moving from a position covered by CSRS or FERS to a NAF instrumentality of the DOD or Coast Guard, or *vice versa,* without a break in service of more than one year.
##### U.S. Geological SurveyOpen-File Report 96-736 Procedure for Making a Mining Claim Density Map from BLM Claim Recordation Digital Databy Harry W. Campbell 1996- View  README file :  (8 KB) Download Open-File Report 96-736 as an Adobe Acrobat .pdf file (**52 KB**). Open-File Report96-736 is also available in hard copy (13 pp.) from the U.S. GeologicalSurvey (888) ASK-USGS.- Download  Adobe Acrobat Readers for DOS, Windows, Macintosh, or UNIX computers. Jump to Adobe Home Page
Return to the Western Mineral Resources
Jump to Western Region GIS Home PageThe URL for this page is: https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1996/of96-736/Please send comments and suggestions, or report problems, to:Doug Causey****Updated: July 29, 2005 by Mike Diggles
#### §§ 1207.171-1207.999 [Reserved]
Docket No: FAA-2015-0074 Dir ID: 2014-NM-138-AD
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Remy
International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John H. Weber, Director and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/    JOHN H. WEBER   
|John H. Weber          
|Director and           
|Chief Executive Officer







March 31, 2006



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Remy International, Inc. and will be retained by
Remy International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# LAILirs n IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
PATRICK JOSEPH ADAMS,

Petitioner, v. OP 20-0250

PETER BLUDWORTH,WARDEN, CROSSROADS CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

Respondent. 

# FILED AUG 0 4 

# 9n20

„ ift Cie:••• • ORDER

On July 21,2020,this Court issued an Order denying and dismissing Patrick Joseph Adams's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus because he did not demonstrate illegal restraint due to his 2019 parole revocation based on several parole violations following his release. The Department of Corrections filed a summary response per our May 8, 2020 Order and addressed Adams's cognizable claims for habeas corpus relief. As we stated then most ofAdams's claims were not remedied by his instant petition. On July 23,2020, Adams filed a Motion to Respond to the State's Answer,his Response,and two exhibits. The Montana Rules ofAppellate Procedure govern filings in original proceedings, such as this writ. M.R.App.P. 14(7)(a)provides: "No reply memorandum shall be filed to the summary response, except on order ofthe supreme court." We construe Adams's pleadings as a reply memorandum that is not allowed here. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Adams's Motion to Respond to the State's Answer is DENIED. The Clerk ofthe Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy ofthis Order to counsel ofrecord and to Joseph Patrick Adams personally. DATED this =p

i, day ofAugust, 2020. ChiefJustice 08/04/2020
Case Number: OP 20-02502 

## " 4/-14-4

3
Justices
§ 190.172 Definitions. The following are definitions for purposes of this subpart only: ( a ) *Qualified article. Qualified article* means an article described in headings 2707, 2708, 2709.00, 2710, 2711, 2712, 2713, 2714, 2715, 2901, and 2902, and subheadings 2903.21.00, 2909.19.14, 2917.36, 2917.39.04, 2917.39.15, 2926.10.00, 3811.21.00, and 3811.90.00, or 3901 through 3914 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). In the case of an article described in headings 3901 through 3914, the definition covers the article in its primary forms as provided in Note 6 to chapter 39 of the HTSUS.
( b ) *Same kind and quality article. Same kind and quality article* means an article which is referred to under the same 8-digit classification of the HTSUS as the article to which it is compared.
( c ) *Exported article. Exported article* means an article which has been exported and is a qualified article, an article of the same kind and quality as the qualified article, or any combination thereof.
#### § 204.3 Public hearings.

A public hearing will be held in connection with each investigation to which this part 204 relates. The Foreign Agricultural Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture may have a representative or representatives at each hearing who shall have the privilege of examining witnesses.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Catherine E. Daly, Deceased.

Order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.; Ingraham, P. J., and Dowling, J., dissented.