alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 5, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I W. Kerry Jackson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: | June 14, 2007 | By:/s/ W. Kerry Jackson      | 
|----- | ------------- | ---------------------------- | 
|      |               | W. Kerry Jackson             | 
|      |               | Executive Vice President and | 
|      |               | Chief Financial Officer      | 





---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              74
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,096
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,199
<PP&E>                                             397
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,929
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           107
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,664
<SALES>                                          8,896
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,896
<CGS>                                            6,671
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 547
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (472)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       243
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       57,763,786
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         58,250,725
<EQUITIES>                                  19,658,787
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              87,722,015
<CASH>                                       8,784,793
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              74,035
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             713,448,582
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             69,370,778
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 294,457
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        6,044,164
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 10,500,000
<COMMON>                                     4,501,858
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,113,038
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               713,448,582
<PREMIUMS>                                 144,846,748
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          4,188,644
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                            (90,480)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 279,870
<BENEFITS>                                 110,768,586
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        54,047,759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (15,501,083)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (5,388,798)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,772,665)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,772,665)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6835
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ADOLPH ANTHONY HIGGINS, a/k/a Michael Augustus Bell, a/k/a Shawn Murray, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-94-182, CA-96-586-6) Submitted: October 20, 1997 Decided: November 7, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Adolph Anthony Higgins, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Higgins , Nos. CR-94-182; CA-96-586-6 (M.D.N.C. May 7, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. III-02-007 March 25, 2002

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT CO. MARCH 28 TO DISCUSS 

PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERFORMANCE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Nuclear

Management Company in Welch, Minnesota, on Thursday, March 28, to discuss the results of the

agency’s annual assessment of safety performance at the Prairie Island Nuclear Power Station. The

two-reactor facility is located near Welch.

The meeting, which will be the open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 11

a.m. in the Prairie Island Training Center, 1660 Wakonade Drive West, Welch. Before the meeting is

concluded, NRC officials will answer any questions from members of the public.

The performance period to be discussed is April 1 through December 31 of last year.

A letter sent from the NRC Region III office to Nuclear Management Company addresses plant

performance during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on

the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/prai_2001q4.pdf

Current performance information for the Prairie Island facility is available on the NRC web site

at: (Unit 1) http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/PRAI1/prai1_chart.html and (Unit 2)

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/PRAI2/prai2_chart.html

# # #
§ 1201.85 Enforcing subpoenas. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 72962 , Sept. 9, 2024.
( a ) If a person who has been served with a Board subpoena fails or refuses to comply with its terms, the party seeking compliance may file a written motion for enforcement with the judge or make an oral motion for enforcement while on the record at a hearing. That party must present the document certifying that the subpoena was served and, except where the witness was required to appear before the judge, must submit an affidavit or sworn statement under 28 U.S.C. 1746 (see appendix IV) describing the failure or refusal to obey the subpoena. The Board, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 1204(c), may then ask the appropriate United States district court to enforce the subpoena. If the person who has failed or refused to comply with a Board subpoena is located in a foreign country, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia will have jurisdiction to enforce compliance, to the extent that a U.S. court can assert jurisdiction over an individual in the foreign country.
( b ) Upon application by the Special Counsel, the Board may seek court enforcement of a subpoena issued by the Special Counsel in the same manner in which it seeks enforcement of Board subpoenas, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 1212(b)(3).
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 208 (Thursday, October 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24139]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 22, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Patrick Wilder, Assistant Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Capitol Bancorp, Ltd., Lansing, Michigan; to acquire 100 percent 
of the voting shares of Capitol Development Bancorp Limited I, Lansing, 
Michigan, and thereby indirectly control Bank of Michigan (in 
organization), Farmington Hills, Michigan.
    In connection with this application, Capitol Development Bancorp 
Limited I, Lansing, Michigan, has applied to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 51 percent of the voting shares of Bank of 
Michigan (in organization), Farmington, Hills, Michigan.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 25, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-24139 Filed 10-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
§ 132.1 Definitions. When used in this part, the following terms shall have the meaning indicated: ( a ) *Absolute* (*or quantitative*) *quotas.* “Absolute (or quantitative) quotas” are those which permit a limited number of units of specified merchandise to be entered or withdrawn for consumption during specified periods. Once the quantity permitted under the quota is filled, no further entries or withdrawals for consumption of merchandise subject to quota are permitted. Some absolute quotas limit the entry or withdrawal of merchandise from particular countries (geographic quotas) while others are global quotas and limit the entry or withdrawal of merchandise not by source but by total quantity.
( b ) *Tariff-rate quotas.* “Tariff-rate quotas” permit a specified quantity of merchandise to be entered or withdrawn for consumption at a reduced duty rate during a specified period.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) *Presentation.* “Presentation” is the delivery in proper form to the appropriate Customs officer of: ( 1 ) An entry summary for consumption, which shall serve as both the entry and the entry summary, with estimated duties attached (see § 141.0a(b)); or
( 2 ) An entry summary for consumption, which shall serve as both the entry and the entry summary, without estimated duties attached, if the entry/entry summary information and a valid scheduled statement date (pursuant to § 24.25 of this chapter) have been successfully received by Customs via the Automated Broker Interface; or
( 3 ) A withdrawal for consumption with estimated duties attached.
( e ) *Quota-class merchandise.* “Quota-class merchandise” is any imported merchandise subject to limitations under an absolute or a tariff-rate quota.
( f ) *Quota priority.* “Quota priority” is the precedence granted to one entry or withdrawal for consumption of quota-class merchandise over other entries or withdrawals of merchandise subject to the same quota.
( g ) *Quota status.* “Quota status” is the standing which entitles quota-class merchandise to admission under an absolute quota, or to a reduced rate of duty under a tariff-rate quota, or to any other quota benefit.
[T.D. 73-203, 38 FR 20230, July 30, 1973, as amended by T.D. 79-221, 44 FR 46814, Aug. 9, 1979; T.D. 89-104, 54 FR 50498, Dec. 7, 1989]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1522 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1522

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
  loan payments received under the National Health Service Corps Loan 
    Repayment Program established in the Public Health Service Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 31, 2003

Mr. Nethercutt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
  loan payments received under the National Health Service Corps Loan 
    Repayment Program established in the Public Health Service Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986; EXCLUSION FOR LOAN PAYMENTS 
              UNDER NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE CORPS LOAN REPAYMENT 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 117 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Loan Payments Under National Health Service Corps Loan 
Repayment Program.--Gross income shall not include any amount received 
under section 338B(g) of the Public Health Service Act.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to amounts received by an individual in taxable years beginning 
after December 31, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         918,928
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,605,207
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,333,023)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,725,687
<PP&E>                                      38,764,545
<DEPRECIATION>                            (13,310,206)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              69,258,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,176,711
<BONDS>                                     39,336,783
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              747
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,715
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,647,370
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                69,258,040
<SALES>                                     11,001,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,001,678
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,584,959
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (9,228)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                54,512
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,011,401
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (639,966)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (217,588)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (422,378)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (422,378)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SURINDER PAUL

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-72145

Agency No. A079-248-868

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 16, 2013** 

Before: CANBY, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Surinder Paul, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of a Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

FILED

APR 22 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-72145

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual

findings, Gonzalez–Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 995, 998 (9th Cir. 2003), and

we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that even if Paul suffered

past persecution, the government established by a preponderance of the evidence

that he can reasonably relocate to another part of India. See id. at 1000

(presumption of well-founded fear can be rebutted if the government can show the

applicant could reasonably be expected to relocate). We reject Paul’s contention

that the agency mischaracterized the background documentation. See id. at 1000-

01 (agency may construe “an ambiguous or somewhat contradictory country

report”). Further, although Paul challenges the agency’s treatment of his affidavits,

he does not argue this impacted the agency’s relocation analysis. In light of our

conclusions, we need not address Paul’s contentions regarding the affidavits. 

Thus, his asylum claim fails.

Because Paul did not demonstrate eligibility for asylum, it follows that he

did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See

Rostomian v. INS, 210 F.3d 1088, 1089 (9th Cir. 2000).

Finally, substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT

protection because Paul failed to demonstrate it is more likely than not he will be
3 11-72145

tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the Indian government. See

Singh v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 1100, 1113 (9th Cir. 2006) (denying CAT relief where

petitioner did not show inability to relocate internally). We reject Paul’s

contention that the BIA improperly or inadequately analyzed his CAT claim.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer
of Central European Distribution Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 1, 2010/s/    Chris BiedermannChris Biedermann Vice President and Chief Financial Officer