alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,908
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,161
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,159
<INVENTORY>                                      5,513
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,948
<PP&E>                                         263,875
<DEPRECIATION>                                 128,216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,517
<BONDS>                                        164,480
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      (5,161)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,564
<SALES>                                        293,907
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               315,700
<CGS>                                           81,460
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  241,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                66,080
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   628<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,790
<INCOME-TAX>                                       992
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,782
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          340
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,442
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>The provision for doubtful accounts and notes is presented within operating
expenses in the accompanying financial statements and is included in total
costs above.
</FN>


</TABLE>
|                             |                                                                                                                       |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|                             |                                                                                                                                                     |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

|                               |                           |                                                              |        |  |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--|
| Date: November 10, 2010  | /s/ Paul Soth   |                                                         |
|                          | Name:           | Paul Soth                                               |   |
|                          | Title:          | Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President  |   |
Exhibit 31.4



CERTIFICATION



I, J. Adam Sothen, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Eastern Virginia Bankshares, Inc.; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 1, 2017



| | /s/ J. Adam Sothen                                  
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | J. Adam Sothen                                      
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Susanna Schleich, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Paul Schleich, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

HEATH BARTON, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4361

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed July 17, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Polk County; J. Kevin Abdoney, Judge.

Heath Barton, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1591

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide a credit toward the 

non-Federal share of projects carried out under the airport improvement 

program to an owner or operator of an airport that is utilized to respond 

to a disaster or emergency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2003

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide a credit 

toward the non-Federal share of projects carried out 

under the airport improvement program to an owner 

or operator of an airport that is utilized to respond 

to a disaster or emergency.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Airport Emergency 

5 Reimbursement Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 1591 IH 

1 SEC. 2. AIP CREDIT FOR UTILIZATION OF AIRPORTS IN RE2 SPONSE TO DISASTERS AND EMERGENCIES. 

3 Section 47109 of title 49, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(d) CREDIT FOR UTILIZATION OF AIRPORTS IN RE6 SPONSE TO DISASTERS AND EMERGENCIES.—

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If an owner or operator of 

8 an airport allows the Director of the Federal Emer9 gency Management Agency or the head of a State or 

10 local agency to utilize the airport to respond to a 

11 disaster or emergency declared under the Robert T. 

12 Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

13 Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), the owner or operator 

14 shall receive a credit for such utilization that may 

15 applied toward the non-Federal share of allowable 

16 project costs for projects carried out at the airport 

17 under this subchapter. 

18 ‘‘(2) AMOUNT OF CREDIT.—The amount of a 

19 credit provided under this subsection for utilization 

20 of an airport shall be in an amount that equals the 

21 revenues that the owner or operator demonstrates to 

22 the satisfaction of the Secretary of Transportation 

23 were lost, and the costs of operating the airport that 

24 the owner or operator demonstrates to the satisfac-
3

•HR 1591 IH 

1 tion of the Secretary were incurred, by the owner or 

2 operator during the period of such utilization.’’.

Æ
§ 151.101 Definitions. In this part: ( a ) *State* means a State or territory or possession of the United States.
( b ) *State or local agency* means: ( 1 ) The executive branch of a State, municipality, or other political subdivision of a State, or an agency or department thereof; or
( 2 ) The executive branch of the District of Columbia, or an agency or department thereof.
( c ) *Federal agency* means an executive agency or other agency of the United States, but does not include a member bank of the Federal Reserve System;
( d ) *State or local officer or employee* means an individual employed by a State or local agency whose principal employment is in connection with an activity which is financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States or a Federal agency but does not include— ( 1 ) An individual who exercises no functions in connection with that activity.
( 2 ) An individual employed by an educational or research institution, establishment, agency, or system which is supported in whole or in part by— ( i ) A State or political subdivision thereof;
( ii ) The District of Columbia; or
( iii ) A recognized religious, philanthropic, or cultural organization.
( e ) *Political party* means a National political party, a State political party, and an affiliated organization.
( f ) *Election* includes a primary, special, and general election.
( g ) *Nonpartisan election* means an election at which none of the candidates is to be nominated or elected as representing a political party any of whose candidates for Presidential elector receives votes in the last preceding election at which Presidential electors were selected.
( h ) *Partisan* when used as an adjective refers to a political party.
( i ) *Elective office* means any office which is voted upon at an election as defined at § 151.101(f), above, but does not include political party office.
[40 FR 42733, Sept. 16, 1975, as amended at 79 FR 25484, May 5, 2014]
#### HENDRICKSON, Respondent, v. MESENBERG, Appellant.

(195 N. W. 36.)

(File No. 5306.

Opinion filed September 25, 1923.)

Vendor and Purchaser — ¡Contracts—-Vendor’s Requirement that Purchaser’s Widow and Children Vacate Held Such Repudiation of Contract as Authorized Recovery of Money Paid.

Where purchaser made down payment, huit took possession without executing note and mortgage for balance of price, and, after his death, vendor required his widow and children to vacate without offering to carry out the contract, this was such repudiation of the -contract as authorized purchaser's administrator to treat it as abandoned and recover the amount paid.

Appeal from 'Circuit Court, Codington ’County; Hon. W. N. Skinner, Judge.

Action by Arthur H. Hendrik-son, as administrator of 'Carl Krause, deceased1, against William Mesenberg. From a judgment and order in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

*John N. We'ber*and *Geo. H. Marquis,*both of Watertown, for Appellant.

*Hanien & Hcmten,*of Watertown, for Respondent.

Appellant cited: Way v. Johnson, 5 S'. D. 237, 58 N. W. 552; Hawkins v. Rodgers (Ore.), 179 Pac. 563,; ‘Strang v. Person (Wash.), 185 Pac. 944; Cooper v. Thomason- (Ore.), 45 Pac. 296.

Respondent cited: -Hauert v. 'Kaufman (S. D.), 186 N. W. 55; Cleary v. Folger, 84 ¡Cal. 316, 24 Pac. 280, 18 Am. 'St. Rep. 187; Ink v. Rohrig, 23 S. D. 54®, 122 N. .W. 594; Hogan v. Bechtel, 27 S. D. 98, 129 NI. -W. 914.

GATES-, J.

This is an action to recover money paid by plaintiff’s intestate, Carl Krause, towards the purchase of a house and *559lots in the town of South ■ Shore. Oral negotiations were had 'between Krause and a banker and between Mesenberg and the banker. Although, as found by the trial court, there never was a binding contract, yet for the purposes of this opinion we will assume that the terms of the contract had been agreed upon. Krause paid $3,000, and was to execute a note and-mortgage for $4,000. Without 'having done this he immediately went into possession of the premises the latter part of October, was taken sick a few days later, and died November 17. The widow and children remained in possession until the following April, when 'defendant required them to vacate, which they did. In June plaintiff was appointed administrator, and brought this action. By his answer, defendant, for the first time, offered to carry out the term’s of the contract. Findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment were rendered! in favor of plaintiff adjudging the repayment of the $3<,000 less the value of the use of the premises and certain other items. Defendant appeals.

Regardless of other questions in the case, we are of the opinion that the requirement by appellant that the widow and children should vacate the premises was such a repudiation of the contract on appellant’s part as authorized the administrator to treat it as abandoned, and to maintain this action. 6 R. C. D. 929.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 195 N. W. 36. See, Headmote, American Key-Numbered Digest, Vendor and purchaser, Key-No. 334(4), 39 Oyc. 2003.
### §§1801 to 1811. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–260, div. Z, title VII, §7002(n)(1), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2576

Section 1801, Pub. L. 98–373, title II, §202, July 31, 1984, 98 Stat. 1249, related to Congressional findings and declaration of purposes.

Section 1802, Pub. L. 98–373, title II, §203, July 31, 1984, 98 Stat. 1250, related to establishment of National Critical Materials Council.

Section 1803, Pub. L. 98–373, title II, §204, July 31, 1984, 98 Stat. 1250, related to responsibilities and authorities of Council.

Section 1804, Pub. L. 98–373, title II, §205, July 31, 1984, 98 Stat. 1251, related to program and policy for advanced materials research and technology.

Section 1805, Pub. L. 98–373, title II, §206, July 31, 1984, 98 Stat. 1252, related to innovation in basic and advanced materials industries.

Section 1806, Pub. L. 98–373, title II, §207, July 31, 1984, 98 Stat. 1252, related to compensation of members and reimbursement.

Section 1807, Pub. L. 98–373, title II, §208, July 31, 1984, 98 Stat. 1253, related to Executive Director.

Section 1808, Pub. L. 98–373, title II, §209, July 31, 1984, 98 Stat. 1253, related to responsibilities and duties of Director.

Section 1809, Pub. L. 98–373, title II, §210, July 31, 1984, 98 Stat. 1253; Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5183, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1454, related to general authority of Council.

Section 1810, Pub. L. 98–373, title II, §211, July 31, 1984, 98 Stat. 1254; Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5184, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1454, related to authorization of appropriations.

Section 1811, Pub. L. 98–373, title II, §212, July 31, 1984, 98 Stat. 1254, defined the term "materials".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 98–373, title II, §201, July 31, 1984, 98 Stat. 1248, provided that title II of Pub. L. 98–373 (enacting this chapter) could be cited as the "National Critical Materials Act of 1984", prior to repeal by Pub. L. 116–260, div. Z, title VII, §7002(n)(1), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2576.
#### Vivien P. Frank, Appellant, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Respondent.

No opinion. Present ■—Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
#### § 361.107 Hours of operation.

The automatic licensing system will generally be accessible 24 hours a day, 7 days a week but may be unavailable at selected times for server maintenance. If the system is unavailable for an extended period of time, parties will be able to obtain licenses from Commerce directly via email (*aluminum.license@trade.gov*) during regular business hours. Should the system be inaccessible for an extended period of time, Commerce would advise CBP to consider this as part of mitigation on any liquidated damage claims that may be issued.
§ 210.38 Record. ( a ) *Definition of the record.* The record shall consist of all pleadings, the notice of investigation, motions and responses, all briefs and written statements, and other documents and things properly filed with the Secretary, in addition to all orders, notices, and initial determinations of the administrative law judge, orders and notices of the Commission, hearing and conference transcripts, evidence admitted into the record (including physical exhibits), and any other items certified into the record by the administrative law judge or the Commission.
( b ) *Reporting and transcription.* Hearings shall be reported and transcribed by the official reporter of the Commission under the supervision of the administrative law judge, and the transcript shall be a part of the record.
( c ) *Corrections.* Changes in the official transcript may be made only when they involve errors affecting substance. A motion to correct a transcript shall be addressed to the administrative law judge, who may order that the transcript be changed to reflect such corrections as are warranted, after consideration of any objections that may be made. Such corrections shall be made by the official reporter by furnishing substitute typed pages, under the usual certificate of the reporter, for insertion in the transcript. The original uncorrected pages shall be retained in the files of the Commission.
( d ) *Certification of record.* The record, including all physical exhibits entered into evidence or such photographic reproductions thereof as the administrative law judge approves, shall be certified to the Commission by the administrative law judge upon his filing of an initial determination or at such earlier time as the Commission may order.
[59 FR 39039, Aug. 1, 1994, as amended at 73 FR 38324, July 7, 2008]
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131745 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131745 

 COA: 261557 

Wayne CC: 04-008323-01

LABARON ALEXANDER DAVIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 15, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0106 - Update on Proposed Rule Changes to 10 CFR 40.51

Accession Number: ML030860481

Date Released: Wednesday, October 8, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML031390395 - SECY-03-0106 - Update on Proposed Rule Changes to 10 CFR 40.51 (6 page(s), 6/24/2003)
    - ML020910085 - SRM-SECY-00-0201 "Proposed Rule - 10CFR40 Amendments to Require NRC Approval for Transfer from Licensees to Exempt Persons." (2 page(s), 3/29/2002)
    - ML031390429 - Federal Register Notice re:  10 CFR Part 40 - Transfers of Certain Source Materials by Specific Licensees" (5 page(s), 8/28/2002)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### § 1320.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to implement the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35)(the Act) concerning collections of information. It is issued under the authority of section 3516 of the Act, which provides that “The Director shall promulgate rules, regulations, or procedures necessary to exercise the authority provided by this chapter.” It is designed to reduce, minimize and control burdens and maximize the practical utility and public benefit of the information created, collected, disclosed, maintained, used, shared and disseminated by or for the Federal government.
<PAGE>

                                                            EXHIBIT 10.45

     EXTENSION AND SECOND AMENDMENT OF LEASE, dated as of January 23, 1995,
by and between RTC PROPERTIES, INC., a New York corporation having an
office at 1185 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 310, New York, New York 10036
("Lessor") and MERCER PRODUCTS CO., INC., a New York corporation having an
office at Hackensack Avenue, Building 10, Kearny, New Jersey 07032
("Lessee").

                             WITNESSETH:

     WHEREAS, Lessor, as lessor, and Lessee, as lessee, entered into a
lease agreement dated as of December 1, 1988 as amended by an Extension and
First Amendment of Lease dated as of January 13, 1994 (hereinafter referred to
as the "Lease Agreement"), covering premises including a portion of Building
10 at the River Terminal Facility, Kearny, New Jersey, as more particularly
described therein (the "Premises"); and

     WHEREAS, the Lease Agreement will expire on April 30, 1995; and

     WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee desire to extend the Lease Agreement for
an additional term of two years and, coincident with such extension, to
amend certain other provisions of the Lease Agreement;

     NOW, THEREFORE, Lessor and Lessee do hereby agree to the extension of
the Lease Agreement and to the amendment of the Lease Agreement as follows:

          PARAGRAPH 1. Section 1.01 of the Lease Agreement is hereby
     amended by deleting the expiration date "April 30, 1995" and inserting
     in its place and stead the date "April 30, 1997".

          PARAGRAPH 2. During the two year extension, the Fixed Rent
     payable by Lessee pursuant to Section 2.01 shall remain unchanged.

          PARAGRAPH 3. Article THIRTY-FOURTH is hereby amended to provide
     that the term "Expiration Date originally provided for herein" shall
     refer to the Term as extended herein, i.e., April 30, 1997.

          PARAGRAPH 4. Unless otherwise provided expressly herein,
     initially capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings
     that they have in the Lease Agreement.

          PARAGRAPH 5. Except as modified herein, the provisions of the
     Lease Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lessor and Lessee have duly executed this Extension
and Second Amendment of Lease as of the day and year first above written.


                                           RTC PROPERTIES, INC.

                                       By: /s/ John Neu
                                           --------------------------------
                                           John Neu

                                           MERCER PRODUCTS CO., INC.

                                       By: /s/ Thomas S. Keup
                                           --------------------------------
                                           Thomas S. Keup

ATTEST:

By: /s/ Phyllis Bartle
    ----------------------------
    Phyllis Bartle