alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

RICKY ALLEN DENNIS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-30097

D.C. No. 1:11-cr-00141-RFC-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Richard F. Cebull, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2014** 

Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, RAWLINSON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Ricky Allen Dennis appeals his conviction in a bench trial on stipulated facts

for conspiracy to commit a robbery affecting interstate commerce under the Hobbs

Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a). We review de novo, and viewing the evidence in the

FILED

APR 15 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
light most favorable to the prosecution, find there is sufficient evidence to support

the conviction because “any rational trier of fact could have found the essential

elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” United States v. Si, 343 F.3d

1116, 1123 (9th Cir. 2003). 

The stipulated facts were sufficient to show that Dennis (1) agreed with two

or more people (2) to commit a robbery that “obstructs, delays, or affects

commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in commerce,” 18 U.S.C.

§ 1951(a); (3) that Dennis “had knowledge of the conspiratorial goal”; and (4) he

“voluntarily participated in trying to accomplish the conspiratorial goal.” Si, 343

F.3d at 1123–24. Dennis agreed with at least three co-conspirators to steal several

dozen kilograms of cocaine from a stash house of a notable drug gang and to kill

the guards if necessary. This conspiracy affected interstate commerce. United

States v. Williams, 547 F.3d 1187, 1197 (9th Cir. 2008) (“squarely reject[ing]”

argument in a Hobbs Act prosecution that “a conspiracy to rob a non-existent stash

house cannot interfere with interstate commerce”). Dennis’s actions were knowing

and voluntary: he sought and received an undercover agent’s cell phone to assist

him, stated he had “contingencies” to dispose of the guards’ bodies, met with

agents about the robbery, asked specific planning questions, and even procured a

black mask for the “special day.”

2
That Dennis was not sure when or where precisely the robbery would take

place is irrelevant, particularly because the “plan” was always that the undercover

agent posing as the gang’s drug courier would “know” only at the last minute when

the shipment arrived and where it was located, and would inform Dennis’s “crew”

at that time. Also irrelevant are any differences between Dennis’s plans and the

(staged) robbery one of his associates attempted to commit after Dennis had been

incarcerated on a separate warrant; Dennis’s actions prior to his arrest were

sufficient to support his conviction. 

AFFIRMED. 

3
Editorial Note on Part 356
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 356 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

§ 356.15 Initiation of proceedings. ( a ) If the Deputy Under Secretary concludes, after an investigation and report by the Director under § 356.14(c) and consultation with the Chief Counsel, that there is reasonable cause to believe that a person has violated a protective order or a disclosure undertaking and that sanctions are appropriate for the violation, the Deputy Under Secretary will, at the Deputy Under Secretary's discretion, either initiate a proceeding under this subpart by issuing a charging letter as set forth in § 356.16 or request that the authorized agency of the involved FTA country initiate a proceeding by issuing a request to charge as set forth in § 356.17. In determining whether sanctions are appropriate and, if so, what sanctions to impose, the Deputy Under Secretary will consider the nature of the violation, the resulting harm, and other relevant circumstances of the case. The Deputy Under Secretary will decide whether to initiate a proceeding no later than 60 days after receiving a report of the investigation.
( b ) If the Department receives a request to charge from an authorized agency of a FTA country, the Deputy Under Secretary will promptly initiate proceedings under this part by issuing a charging letter as set forth in § 356.16.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-03-045 July 28, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC TO MEET WITH EXELON TO DISCUSS STATUS OF COMPANY’S REACTORS

 Staff from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Region I and III and Headquarters

offices will meet with representatives of Exelon Generation Company on Wednesday, July 30, to

discuss the status of Exelon’s nuclear power plants. The meeting is scheduled to take place from

1 to 4 p.m. at the NRC’s Region I Office in King of Prussia, Pa.

 Members of the public are invited to observe the meeting and will have an opportunity to

communicate with NRC staff before the session is adjourned.

 Exelon operates 17 reactors at 10 different sites. They include the Limerick 1 and 2 and

Peach Bottom 2 and 3 nuclear power plants, all of which are located in Pennsylvania; and the

Braidwood 1 and 2, Byron 1 and 2, Dresden 2 and 3, LaSalle County 1 and 2, and Quad Cities 1

and 2 nuclear power plants, all of which are located in Illinois. In addition, Exelon, by virtue of a

joint venture with British Energy known as AmerGen, operates the Clinton, Oyster Creek and

Three Mile Island 1 nuclear power plants, located in Illinois, New Jersey and Pennsylvania,

respectively.

 #
#### § 190.0a Claims filed under NAFTA and USMCA.

Claims for drawback filed under the provisions of part 181 or part 182 of this chapter must be filed separately from claims filed under the provisions of this part.

[83 FR 64997, Dec. 18, 2018, as amended by CBP Dec. 21-10, 86 FR 35594, July 6, 2021]
#### John F. GARFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carol DALY; * et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-16243.

D.C. No. CV-96-01996-WBS/GGH.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 **.

Decided May 28, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS, and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 Garfield’s unopposed motion to substitute parties is granted. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2). The Clerk shall amend the docket by substituting Carol Daly in place of her predecessor, James Nielson.

**

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

John F. Garfield, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action seeking to replace state parole board members with panel members appointed by the district court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal, *Butterfield v. Bail,*120 F.3d 1023, 1024 (9th Cir.1997), and we affirm.

*663The district court properly dismissed Garfield’s action because the proposed injunctive relief is intrusive and unworkable, and Garfield has adequate state remedies to address any violations of law that state officials may commit in denying him parole. *See O’Shea v. Littleton,*414 U.S. 488, 500-02, 94 S.Ct. 669, 38 L.Ed.2d 674 (1974); *In re Rosencrantz,*116 Cal.Rptr.2d 69, 81 (Cal.Ct.App.2002) (governor’s decision to reverse the parole board is subject to judicial review); *Terhune v. Superior Court (In re Rosenkrantz),*80 Cal.App.4th 409, 95 Cal.Rptr.2d 279, 293-94 (Cal.Ct. App.2000) (prisoner may challenge parole board’s decision by way of a habeas corpus petition).

Garfield’s motion for judicial notice is denied.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) announces the persons who will serve on the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's Performance Review Board. This action is being taken in accordance with Title 5, U.S.C., Section 4314(c)(4), which requires that members of performance review boards be appointed in a manner to ensure consistency, stability, and objectivity in performance appraisals, and requires that notice of the appointment of an individual to serve as a member be published in the Federal Register.

The following persons will serve on the SAMHSA Performance Review Board, which oversees the evaluation of performance appraisals of SAMHSA's Senior Executive Service (SES) members: James L. Stone, Chairperson; Daryl W. Kade; Douglas Morgan; Kathryn Power.

For further information about the SAMHSA Performance Review Board, contact the Division of Management Systems, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Room 3-1017, Rockville, Maryland 20857, telephone (240) 276-1124 (not a toll-free number).

Dated: October 4, 2004.

Charles G. Curie,

Administrator, SAMHSA.

[FR Doc. 04-24155  Filed 10-28-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carmen P. Ruggiero, Jr., Appellant.

*727Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Deyo and Bergan, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER III—MONEY LAUNDERING AND RELATED FINANCIAL CRIMES
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone 301/415-820

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-074 June 3, 2003

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETINGS ON UPDATING GENERIC

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR LICENSE RENEWAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold four public meetings in July concerning

an update of its “Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) for License Renewal of

Nuclear Plants,” NUREG-1437, originally published in 1996.

The GEIS assesses the overall scope and impact of environmental effects associated with

license renewal at any nuclear power plant site. Separate supplements to the GEIS are prepared

to assess specific environmental issues at individual plants when a license renewal application is

submitted for that plant.

 Members of the public are invited to comment on issues that the NRC should consider

in its GEIS update. NRC staff will host informal discussions one hour prior to each meeting,

answering questions and providing additional information about the scoping process, but no

formal submittals will be accepted during the discussions. The formal meetings will start at 7

p.m. on the following dates:

July 8: DoubleTree-Atlanta Perimeter, 6120 Peachtree Dunwoody Road, Atlanta,

Georgia;

July 10: Hilton-Oak Lawn, 9333 South Cicero Avenue, Oak Lawn, Illinois;

July 15: Hilton-Anaheim, 777 Convention Way, Anaheim, California, and;

July 17: Executive Conference Center at Bayside (adjacent to the DoubleTree-Bayside),

200 Mount Vernon Street, Boston, Massachusetts.

Those who wish to present oral comments are encouraged to register by contacting Barry

Zalcman at 800-368-5642, x2419, or via e-mail at LRGEISUpdate@nrc.gov no later than June

30. Speaker registration will be available before the start of each session, but individual

comment time may be limited. Written comments should be submitted by September 2, either by

mail to the Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Mail Stop

T-6-D 59, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 20555-0001, or by e-mail to
LRGEISUpdate@nrc.gov .

The GEIS, its Addendum 1 that was published in 1999, and subsequent site-specific

Supplements may be viewed on the NRC web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1437/ . These documents are also

available in the NRC Public Document Room at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike,

Rockville, Maryland.

At the conclusion of the information-gathering process, the NRC staff will prepare a

summary of conclusions and significant issues and will send a copy to interested persons who

participated in the scoping process. The summary will also be available through the NRC’s

Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html . The NRC will hold additional public

meetings for public comment once the draft GEIS revision is prepared.

###
## COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00264

- CV

ALLEN "F" CALTON APPELLANT

V.

STEVE SCHILLER, SHAR ON KELLER, TERRIE LIVIN GSTON, ROBERT GILL, JOHN CA YCE, AND LOUIS STURNS APPELLEES

------------
FROM THE 153RD DISTR IC T COURT OF TARRANT C OUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 153

- 270690

- 14

------------


### ORDER

------------ Appellant is attempting to appeal from several orders in a case in which he

named the Chief Justice of this court, in her official capacity , as a defendant

. According ly, the following six justices recuse themselves from participating in this
appeal : Chief Justice Terrie Livingston, Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot, Justice Anne

Gardner, Justice Sue Walker, Justice Bill Meier, and Justice Lee Gabriel. Justice

Bonnie Sudderth does not recuse herself from participating in this appeal

. See
Tex. R. App. P. 16.2; Tex. R. Civ. P. 18b( b)

.2 Because there is now an insufficient number of justices available to

constitute a panel of the court to hear this appeal , this court request s the Chief
Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas to transfer this appeal to another court of
appeals for good cause for that court to file and decide this appeal

. See Tex.
Gov’t Code Ann. § 73.001 (Vernon 20 13 ); Miles v. Ford Motor Co ., 914 S.W.2d
135, 137 (T ex. 1995).
A copy of this order shall be transmitted to appellant , the Texas Supreme
Court, all attorneys of record, the trial court judge, the trial court clerk, and the

court reporter.

DATED September 3, 2015

. Voluntarily Recus ed Justices Justice Not Voluntarily Recusing

/s/ Terrie Livingston TERRIE LIVINGSTON CHIEF JUSTICE /s/ Bonnie Sudderth BONNIE SUDDERTH JUSTICE

/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot LEE ANN DAUPHINOT JUSTICE

/s/ Anne Gardner ANNE GARDNER JUSTICE

/s/ Sue Walker SUE WALKER JUSTICE

/s/ Bill Meier BILL MEIER JUSTICE

/s/ Lee Gabriel LEE GABRIEL JUSTICE
§ 210.6 Computation of time, additional hearings, postponements, continuances, and extensions of time. ( a ) Unless the Commission, the administrative law judge, or this or another section of this part specifically provides otherwise, the computation of time and the granting of additional hearings, postponements, continuances, and extensions of time shall be in accordance with §§ 201.14 and 201.16(d) and (e) of this chapter.
( b ) Whenever a party has the right or is required to perform some act or to take some action within a prescribed period after service of a document upon it, and the document was served by mail, the deadline shall be computed by adding to the end of the prescribed period the additional time allotted under § 201.16(d), unless the Commission, the administrative law judge, or another section of this part specifically provides otherwise.
( c ) Whenever a party has the right or is required to perform some act or to take some action within a prescribed period after service of a Commission document upon it, and the document was served by express delivery, the deadline shall be computed by adding to the end of the prescribed period the additional time allotted under § 201.16(e), unless the Commission, the administrative law judge, or another section of this part specifically provides otherwise.
[78 FR 23480, Apr. 19, 2013]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA compressible Navier-Stokes code for turbulent flow modelingAn implicit, finite volume code for solving two dimensional, compressible turbulent flows is described. Second order upwind differencing of the inviscid terms of the equations is used to enhance stability and accuracy. A diagonal form of the implicit algorithm is used to improve efficiency. Several zero and two equation turbulence models are incorporated to study their impact on overall flow modeling accuracy. Applications to external and internal flows are discussed.Document ID19840013765Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCoakley, T. J.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1984Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberA-9669NASA-TM-85899NAS 1.15:85899Accession Number84N21833Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-51-11Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840013765.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §3807. Right to administrative offset

(a) The amount of any penalty or assessment which has become final under section 3803 of this title, or for which a judgment has been entered under section 3805(e) or 3806 of this title, or any amount agreed upon in a settlement or compromise under section 3803(j) or 3806(f) of this title, may be collected by administrative offset under section 3716 of this title, except that an administrative offset may not be made under this subsection against a refund of an overpayment of Federal taxes, then or later owing by the United States to the person liable for such penalty or assessment.

(b) All amounts collected pursuant to this section shall be remitted to the Secretary of the Treasury for deposit in accordance with section 3806(g) of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 99–509, title VI, §6103(a), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1947.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001047166
<NAME> UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA), INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           23811
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   485721
<ALLOWANCES>                                     50736
<INVENTORY>                                     129473
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         2451292
<DEPRECIATION>                                  515035
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4425023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        2266148
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1693274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4425023
<SALES>                                        2233628
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2233628
<CGS>                                           451097
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1408710
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1646)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 42143
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              139828
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 284467
<INCOME-TAX>                                    116628
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             167839
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    167839
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Dean Witter World Currency Fund L.P. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      16,469,645
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,715<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,094,366<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,094,366<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           (1,246,939)<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               712,950
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,959,889)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,959,889)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,959,889)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $62,279 and due from
DWR of $1,436.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized loss on open contracts of $438,994.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $307,214, accrued
management fees of $40,151, and accrued administrative expenses
of $33,960.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $(1,069,083), net
change in unrealized of $(588,919) and interest income of $411,063.
</FN>


</TABLE>