alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that:

         (1)      this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         (2)      the information contained in this periodic report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of BUCA, Inc.


                                        /s/ Greg A. Gadel
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Greg A. Gadel
                                        Executive Vice President, Chief
                                        Financial Officer, Secretary
                                        and Treasurer



     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to BUCA, Inc. and will be retained by BUCA, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Harry Goldman, Respondent. Hollander Accessories, Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1564-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New York (FEMA-1564-DR), dated October 1, 2004, and related determinations.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

October 22, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New York is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of October 1, 2004:

Niagara and Orange Counties for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs; 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Michael D. Brown,

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security.

[FR Doc. 04-24186 Filed 10-28-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 210 (Monday, November 1, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 63408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24322]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ID-400-1120-PH]


Notice of Public Meeting, Coeur d'Alene District Resource 
Advisory Council Meeting; Idaho

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Coeur 
d'Alene District Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as indicated 
below.

DATES: December 2 and 3, 2004. The meeting will be held in the 
conference room at Coffeeville located at 1710 North 4th Street in 
Coeur d'Alene on December 2nd from 10:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. and on December 
3rd from 8 a.m. to about 2 p.m. The public comment period will be from 
8 a.m. to 9 a.m. on December 3, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Snook, RAC Coordinator, BLM 
Coeur d'Alene District, 1808 N. Third Street, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 
83814 or telephone (208) 769-5004.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15-member Council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of 
planning and management issues associated with public land management 
in Idaho. The agenda for the December 2 and 3, 2004, meeting will 
include: Election of officers, an update on the Idaho BLM 
Reorganization, an overview of the Coeur d'Alene District programs, 
reports on past RAC meetings and an update on the Resource Management 
Plans being prepared for the Coeur d'Alene and Cottonwood Field 
Offices.
    All meetings are open to the public. The public may present written 
comments to the Council. Each formal Council meeting will also have 
time allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of 
persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual 
oral comments may be limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need 
special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other 
reasonable accommodations, should contact the BLM as provided above.

    Dated: October 26, 2004.
Stephanie Snook,
Acting District Manager.
[FR Doc. 04-24322 Filed 10-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification**I, Peter S. Atkinson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.August 8, 2006                                                      /s/ PETER S. ATKINSON   Peter S. Atkinson   Chief Financial Officer   
1
§ 212.11 Net worth exhibit. ( a ) Each applicant except a qualified tax-exempt organization or cooperative association must provide with its application a detailed exhibit showing the net worth of the applicant and any affiliates (as defined in § 212.04(f) of this part) when the proceeding was initiated. The exhibit may be in any form convenient to the applicant that provides full disclosure of the applicant's and its affiliates' assets and liabilities and is sufficient to determine whether the applicant qualifies under the standards in this part. The presiding officer may require an applicant to file additional information to determine its eligibility for an award.
( b ) Ordinarily, the net worth exhibit will be included in the public record of the proceeding. However, an applicant that objects to public disclosure of information in any portion of the exhibit and believes there are legal grounds for withholding it from disclosure may submit that portion of the exhibit directly to the presiding officer in a sealed envelope labeled “Confidential Financial Information,” accompanied by a motion to withhold the information from public disclosure. The motion shall describe the information sought to be withheld and explain in detail why it falls within one or more of the specific exemptions from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(1)-(9), why public disclosure of the information would adversely affect the applicant, and why disclosure is not required in the public interest. The material in question shall be served on the Commission investigative attorney or counsel representing another agency against which the applicant seeks an award, but need not be served on any other party to the proceeding. If the presiding officer finds that the information should not be withheld from disclosure, it shall be placed in the public record of the proceeding. Otherwise, any request to inspect or copy the exhibit shall be disposed of in accordance with the Commission's established procedures under the Freedom of Information Act, 19 CFR 201.17-201.21.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7553

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CODELL GRIFFIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-01-50; CA-05-2216-6-HMH)

Submitted: January 31, 2006 Decided: February 14, 2006

Before LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Codell Griffin, Appellant Pro Se. Regan Alexandra Pendleton,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Codell Griffin, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final

order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims

addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find both that the district court’s assessment of his

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-

38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Griffin has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4740

_____________________________

ANTHONY ANTWAN PRINCE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark Borello, Judge.

June 11, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, BILBREY, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Kasey Lacey, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### In the Matter of Floyd M. Kyes, Petitioner, against Holton V. Noyes, as Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets of the State of New York, Respondent.

This is a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act. By it petitioner reviews a determination of the respondent Commissioner which, under date of August 24, 1940, denied petitioner’s application for a milk dealer’s license for the statutory, licensed period ending March 31, 1941. Petitioner applied for a milk dealer’s license on February 7, 1940. That application was denied on the ground that petitioner had been selling milk in Cortland and Groton at retail to consumers without a milk license in violation of section 257 of the Agriculture and Markets Law. It is not disputed that petitioner had sold and delivered milk in the localities named without a license and without a permit from the local health authorities. The fact that he was so engaged justified the Commissioner’s decision (Agriculture and Markets Law, § 258-c, subd. k). The Commissioner also determined that petitioner had built and equipped his milk plant without first obtaining approval as required by official order No. 110. The petitioner’s principal point is that section 258-c of the Agriculture and Markets Law which permits the commissioner to deny an application unless he is satisfied “that the issuance of the license will not tend to a destructive competition in a market already adequately served, and that the issuance of the license is in the public interest ” is an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power. It is conceded that petitioner has been selling *830milk in Cortland and Groton since 1934 without any permit. In view of that fact we need not consider the constitutional objection raised by petitioner. The proof sustains the Commissioner’s determination which is confirmed, without costs. Determination confirmed, without costs. Hill, P. J., Heffeman, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Brewster, J., taking no part.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

The following notice of meeting is published pursuant to Section 3(a) of the Government in the Sunshine Act (Pub. L. 94-409), 5 U.S.C. 552b: 

# Agency Holding Meeting:

 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 

# Date and Time:

 October 27, 2004, (within a relatively short time after the Commission's open meeting on October 27). 

# Place:

 Room 3M 4A/B, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. 

# Status:

 Closed. 

# Matters to be Considered:

 Non-Public Investigations and Inquiries, Enforcement Related Matters, and Security of Regulated Facilities. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

 Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, telephone (202) 502-8400. 

Chairman Wood and Commissioners Brownell, Kelliher, and Kelly voted to hold a closed meeting on October 27, 2004. The certification of the General Counsel explaining the action closing the meeting is available for public inspection in the Commission's Public Reference Room at 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. 

                        The Chairman and the Commissioners, their assistants, the Commission's Secretary and her assistant, the General Counsel and members of her staff, and a stenographer are expected to attend the meeting. Other staff members from the Commission's program offices who will                               ( print page 62445)                            advise the Commissioners in the matters discussed will also be present.                     

Magalie R. Salas, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 04-23996 Filed 10-21-04; 4:45 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22
- 50236 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Ryan Graves,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:21
- CR
- 306
- 1

**______________________________** Before **Jones, Haynes,** and **Oldham,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Ryan Graves has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Graves has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the re levant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir . R.**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 11, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-50236 Document: 00516607307 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2023No. 22
- 50236

2 review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further resp onsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 22-50236 Document: 00516607307 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/11/2023
### §49. Lands in Missouri and Kansas; disposal as agricultural lands

Except as otherwise provided in chapter 3A of this title, within the States of Missouri and Kansas deposits of coal, iron, lead, or other mineral are excluded from the operation of sections 22 to 24, 26 to 28, 29, 30, 33 to 35, 37, 39 to 42, and 47 of this title, and all lands in said States shall be subject to disposal as agricultural lands.

(May 5, 1876, ch. 91, 19 Stat. 52; Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, §1, 41 Stat. 437.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 22 to 24, 26 to 28, 29, 30, 33 to 35, 37, 39 to 42, and 47 of this title, referred to in text, were in the original "the act entitled 'An act to promote the development of mining resources of the United States' approved May tenth, eighteen hundred and seventy-two", meaning act May 10, 1872, ch. 152, 17 Stat. 91, popularly known as the Mining Act of 1872. That act was incorporated into the Revised Statutes as R.S. §§2319 to 2328, 2331, 2333 to 2337, and 2344, which are classified to sections 22 to 24, 26 to 28, 29, 30, 33 to 35, 37, 39 to 42, and 47 of this title. For complete classification of R.S. §§2319 to 2328, 2331, 2333 to 2337, and 2344 to the Code, see Tables.

#### Amendments

1920—The exception clause has been inserted at beginning of this section because of act Feb. 25, 1920, which provided that deposits of coal, phosphate, sodium, oil, oil shale, or gas, and lands containing such deposits owned by the United States, shall be subject to disposition in the form and manner provided by such act.