alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 03-134 October 23, 2003

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING NOVEMBER 4 IN EUNICE, N.M., TO DISCUSS

LICENSING PROCESS FOR PROPOSED URANIUM ENRICHMENT FACILITY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting in Eunice, New Mexico, on

Tuesday evening, November 4, to discuss the agency’s licensing process for a proposed gas centrifuge

uranium enrichment facility.

Technical staff from the NRC’s headquarters in Rockville, Maryland, and its Region II office in

Atlanta will be on hand to discuss the agency’s procedures for reviewing a license application for the

plant, developing an environmental impact statement, and inspecting the plant. Members of the public

will be able to ask questions.

Louisiana Energy Services (LES), an international consortium of companies in the nuclear

industry, announced in September its intention to build a gas centrifuge uranium enrichment plant in

Lea County, New Mexico. The plant will enrich uranium in the isotope U235 for use in the production

of fuel for nuclear power plants. The consortium advised the NRC that it intends to submit a license

application by the end of the year. LES plans to call the plant the National Enrichment Facility.

The NRC’s public meeting will be held at the Eunice Community Center, 1115 I Avenue, at 

7 p.m. on November 4. The meeting’s agenda is available through the NRC’s ADAMS document

system, at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html , using accession number

ML032810264. 

###
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-181 December 1, 2000

NRC ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD TO CONSIDER

REQUESTS FOR RENEWAL OF TURKEY POINT LICENSE

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will consider two

requests for a hearing on the proposed renewal of the operating licenses for Units 3 and 4 of the Turkey

Point Nuclear Power Plant in Miami-Dade County, Florida.

In an order of November 27 providing direction, the Commission called for the Licensing

Board to decide within 90 days whether the two petitions for hearing will be granted. If a hearing is

granted, the Commission has ordered that the Licensing Board set a schedule for conducting the

hearing with a goal to issue a Commission decision on the pending license renewal application in about

two and one half years.

The Commission believes this schedule is achievable under current NRC rules of practice, the

provisions of its order, and the NRC staff’s schedule for reviewing the application. At the same time,

the Commission order says: “We do not expect the Licensing Board to sacrifice fairness and sound

decision-making to expedite any hearing granted on this application. We do expect, however, the

Licensing Board to use the techniques specified in this order and in the Commission’s policy statement

on the conduct of adjudicatory proceedings to ensure prompt and efficient resolution of contested

issues.”

Members of the Licensing Board are Thomas S. Moore, Chairman; Dr. Richard F. Cole and Dr.

Charles N. Kelber.

Florida Power & Light Company, operator of the Turkey Point plant, filed its application on

September 11 for a 20-year extension of the two operating licenses. The application is now under

review by the NRC staff.

Petitions for a hearing and to intervene in the hearing, if one is held, were received from Mark

P. Oncavage and Joette Lorion, both of Miami.

###
August 23, 2004

MEMORANDUM TO: Luis A. Reyes 

Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Annette L. Vietti-Cook, Secretary /RA/

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS - COMSECY-04-0047 - STATUS OF

SECURITY-RELATED RULEMAKING

The Commission has approved closure of the two security-related action items addressed in the

COMSECY. The staff should forego development of a rulemaking plan and, in conjunction with

OGC, provide the Commission a schedule for completing the 73.1 DBT rulemaking(s) and the

10 CFR 73.55/Part 73 Appendix B rulemaking by November 15, 2004.

(EDO/OGC) (SECY Suspense: 11/15/04)

In developing the schedule, the staff should engage the Commission Technical Assistants

before the schedule is finalized to discuss the communications and other strategies for this

rulemaking effort.

cc: Chairman Diaz 

Commissioner McGaffigan 

Commissioner Merrifield 

OGC

CFO

OCA

OIG

OPA 

Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ACNW, ASLBP (via E-Mail)

PDR
#### Van Winkle *vs.*Stearns and others.

•Sheriff's sale set aside, on the ground of surprise, upon terms.

Motion to set aside sheriff’s sale under foreclosure, on the ground of surprise.

*Mr. Thomas M.*Moore, for motion.

*Mr. James VanBlarcom, contra.*

The Chancellor.

This is an application in behalf of Dr. Richard A. Terhune, to set aside a sale made by the sheriff of Passaic county, of -certain mortgaged premises, by virtue of an execution for the .sale thereof, issued in this cause. It appears, from the evidence, that the foreclosure was begun and conducted at the request and in the interest of Stearns, the owner of the property, who held it subject to the complainant’s mortgage. The ■origin of that mortgage is this: Dr. Terhune was at one .time the owner of the mortgaged premises. Having agreed to sell them, he executed, at the request of the purchaser and for the accommodation of the latter, and without consideration, his bond and mortgage thereon for $1000 and interest, and conveyed the property to the purchaser, subject to the mortgage. He did not, it may be remarked, ascertain the fact of his liability for deficiency until after the sheriff’s sale had taken place. He had a mistaken notion that he could not be held liable personally. As between Stearns, who was *239the real purchaser at the sale, and Dr. Terhune, the sale ought not, under the circumstances, to stand. There are other considerations also, arising out of the complainant’s conversation with Johnston the evening before the sale, which are of much weight in favor of granting the relief which Dr. Terhune seeks. The property sold for only about one-fifth of its value. The bidder to whom it was struck off was nominally the complainant’s son, but actually the complainant, and the real purchaser was Stearns. The sale will be set aside, and the sheriff will be directed to re-sell the property. Dr. Terhune will be required to pay the costs of the suit at law which the complainant has brought against him on the bond, and to give security that he will bid at the sheriff’s sale an amount equal to the amount which will then be due to the complainant on his decree, including the sheriff’s fees of both .sales.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-02-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-04-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-04-1997
<CASH>                                          12,423
<SECURITIES>                                     4,352
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,624
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,870
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,405
<PP&E>                                          76,605
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,107
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,038
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           503
<OTHER-SE>                                     112,303
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,987
<SALES>                                        115,738
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,738
<CGS>                                           48,111
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,445
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,636
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,379
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,257
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,257
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §3544. Rights and remedies of the United States Government reserved

This subchapter does not affect a right or remedy the United States Government has by law to recover a tax, debt, or demand.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 969.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3544 | 31:520. | R.S. §3638. |

The words "relating to distress warrants" and "take away or" are omitted as surplus.
3rd Amend / Marie St. John Gray



 Exhibit 10.46 
  
 THIRD AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 AMENDED AND
RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (this
“Third Amendment”), dated January 9, 2003, is entered into by and between St. John Knits, Inc., a California corporation (“Company”), and Marie St. John Gray, an individual (“Executive”), and amends terms of that
certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of July 14, 1998, as amended, between the Company and Executive (the “1998 Agreement”). In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement set forth herein, the parties hereto
agree as follows (all capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the 1998 Agreement). 
  
 1. Section IV.1(b)(vi) of the 1998 Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety. 
  
 2. Section IV.5(e)
of the 1998 Agreement shall be amended to delete the language “or 4.1(b)(vi)”. 
  
 3. Section IV.5(f) of
the 1998 Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety. 
  
 4. Section V.1 shall be amended to replace the notice
information for David Krinsky, Esq. with the following: 
  
 “Mr. Jim Kelley 
 Vestar Capital Partners 
 1225 17th Street, Suite 1660 
 Denver, Colorado 80202” 
  
 5. All other provisions contained in Article V of the 1998 Agreement
are incorporated into this Third Amendment by this reference. 
  
 6. All other terms and conditions of the 1998
Agreement, as amended, shall remain the same. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written. 
  
 
	 “Company”
 
	 
	 St. John Knits, Inc.,
 a California corporation
 
	 
	 By:
 	 	 /s/    Roger Ruppert        
 

	  	 	 Roger Ruppert
 Executive Vice President and
 Chief Financial Officer
 

 
  
 
	 “Executive”
 
	 
	 /s/    Marie St. John Gray        



	 Marie St. John Gray
 

 
  
 
	 
	 Approved as to Content:
  
 
	 
	 
Jim Kelley
 Chairman of the Board
 

 

 
 2
### **CHAPTER 50—FEDERAL OCEAN ACIDIFICATION RESEARCH AND MONITORING**

Sec.
3701.
Purposes.
3702.
Definitions.
3703.
Interagency working group.
3704.
Strategic research plan.
3705.
NOAA ocean acidification activities.
3706.
NSF ocean acidification activities.
3707.
NASA ocean acidification activities.
3708.
Authorization of appropriations.
OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

**** SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITING ****

The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S. Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome. NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the full texts of the opinions after they have been released electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions.

The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.

Smith, Appellant, v. Jordan, d.b.a. Lima Properties, Inc., et al., Appellees. [Cite as Smith v. Jordan (1994), Ohio St.3d .] Landlords and tenants--Landlord owes same duties to persons lawfully upon leased premises as he owes to the tenant--Application of R.C. 5321.04 to invited guests. (No. 94-2027--Submitted December 28, 1994--Decided December 30, 1994.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Allen County, No.

1-94-27.

Susan M. Lutz, for appellant. Cory, Meredith, Witter, Roush & Cheney Co., L.P.A., and Donald J. Witter, for appellee Craig A. Jordan. Ulmer & Berne, Richard D. Sweebe and Roberto H. Rodriguez, Jr., for appellee Miner O. Dickason.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals to consider Shump v. First Continental-Robinwood Assoc. (1994), Ohio St.3d ,

N.E.2d . Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
§ 1201.181 Authority and explanation. ( a ) *Authority.* Under 5 U.S.C. 1204(a)(2), the Board has the authority to order any Federal agency or employee to comply with decisions and orders issued under its jurisdiction and the authority to enforce compliance with its orders and decisions. The Board's decisions and orders, when appropriate, will contain a notice of the Board's enforcement authority.
( b ) *Requirements for parties.* The parties are expected to cooperate fully with each other so that compliance with the Board's orders and decisions can be accomplished promptly and in accordance with the laws, rules, and regulations that apply to individual cases. Agencies must promptly inform an appellant of actions taken to comply and must inform the appellant when it believes compliance is complete. Appellants must provide agencies with all information necessary for compliance and should monitor the agency's progress towards compliance.
[77 FR 62371, Oct. 12, 2012]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0556

_________________

DEANNA H. McATEE,

 Plaintiff and Appellant,

 v.

MORRISON AND FRAMPTON, PLLP,

 Defendant and Appellee.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Dan Wilson, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 14 2021

07/14/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0556
### §506. Assignment and detail of members of Regular Army or Regular Air Force for instruction of National Guard

(a) The President shall assign for instruction of the National Guard such members of the Regular Army or the Regular Air Force as he considers necessary.

(b) The Secretary of the Army may detail members of the Regular Army to attend an encampment, maneuver, or other exercise, for field or coast-defense instruction of the Army National Guard. Similarly, the Secretary of the Air Force may detail members of the Regular Air Force to attend exercises for field or coast-defense instruction of the Air National Guard. Members so detailed shall instruct the members of the National Guard at the exercise, as directed by the Secretary concerned, or as requested by the governor or commanding officer of the National Guard there assembled.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 611.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 506(a)506(b) | 32:66.32:67. | June 3, 1916, ch. 134, §81 (1st sentence of 2d par., less 1st 7 words); added June 4, 1920, ch. 227, subch. I, §44 (5th sentence, less 1st 6 words); restated Sept. 22, 1922 ch. 423, §4 (6th sentence, less 1st 6 words); restated Feb. 28, 1925, ch. 371, §3 (6th sentence, less 1st 6 words); restated June 15, 1933, ch. 87, §16 (1st sentence of 2d par., less 1st 7 words), 48 Stat. 160.June 3, 1916, ch. 134, §96, 39 Stat. 207. |

506(b)

32:67.

June 3, 1916, ch. 134, §96, 39 Stat. 207.

In subsection (a), the words "members of the Regular Army and the Regular Air Force" are substituted for the words "officers of the Regular Army" and "enlisted men of the Regular Army".

In subsection (b), the words "members" is substituted for the words "officers and enlisted men". The words "one or more", "information", and "encampment, maneuver, or other" are omitted as surplusage.
#### Helen SWINGLE, v. William J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General.

No. 01-2276.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted April 11, 2002.

Filed April 23, 2002.

Before McKEE, FUENTES and POGUE Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Helen Swingle appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to her employer, the United States Postal Service, and against her, on the suit she brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have reviewed the thoughtful Memorandum Opinion that the district court filed on May 7, 2001. We will affirm substantially for the reasons set forth therein.
§ 1603.1 Definitions. ( a ) Definitions generally applicable to the Thrift Savings Plan are set forth at 5 CFR 1690.1.
( b ) As used in this part:
*Civilian service* means: ( 1 ) Any non-military service that is creditable under either 5 U.S.C. chapter 83, subchapter III, or 5 U.S.C. 8411. However, that service is to be determined without regard to any time limitations, any deposit or redeposit requirements contained in those statutory provisions after performing the service involved, or any requirement that the individual give written notice of that individual's desire to become subject to the retirement system established by 5 U.S.C. chapters 83 or 84; or
( 2 ) Any military service creditable under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 8432b(h)(1) and the regulations at 5 CFR part 1620, subpart H.
*Uniformed services* means the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, Public Health Service, and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, as well as members of the Ready Reserve including the National Guard.
*Military service* means service that is creditable under 37 U.S.C. 205.
*Vested* means those amounts in an individual account which are nonforfeitable.
*Year of service* means one full calendar year of service.
[68 FR 35497, June 13, 2003, as amended at 82 FR 60104, Dec. 19, 2017]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                              BIG CITY RADIO, INC.
 
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                       -------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                    <C>            <C>            <C>
                                                                           1996           1997           1998
                                                                       -------------  -------------  -------------
Net loss.............................................................  $  (3,098,000)   (16,918,000)   (17,449,000)
                                                                       -------------  -------------  -------------
                                                                       -------------  -------------  -------------
Weighted average number of shares outstanding--basic: Weighted
  average number of common shares outstanding........................      8,024,000      9,539,000     14,026,000
Dilutive effect of stock options after application of treasury stock
  method.............................................................             --             --             --
                                                                       -------------  -------------  -------------
Weighted average number of shares outstanding........................      8,024,000      9,539,000     14,026,000
                                                                       -------------  -------------  -------------
                                                                       -------------  -------------  -------------
Net loss per share:
  Basic and dilutive.................................................  $        (.39)         (1.77)         (1.24)
                                                                       -------------  -------------  -------------
                                                                       -------------  -------------  -------------
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<S><C>


<PAGE>
                         AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                TO
                       CONSULTING AGREEMENT

     This AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), dated as of
December 23, 1999, by and between AMERICAN KIOSK CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), and EUGENE T. SCHMIDT ("Schmidt").

                       W I T N E S S E T H

     WHEREAS, the Company and the Schmidt are parties to a Consulting Areement, dated as of
December 8, 1999 (the "Consulting Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS, the Company and Zero's Mr. Submarine, Inc., a Virginia corporation ("Zeros"),
are parties to a certain asset purchase agreement, dated as of December 8, 1999 (the "Purchase
Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS, the effectiveness of the Purchase Agreement is contingent upon the approval of
the stockholders of Zeros; and

     WHEREAS, the Company and Schmidt have agreed to amend the Consulting Agreement to
provide that the Term, as defined therein, shall commence upon the approval of the Zeros stockholders
of the Purchase Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable considerations, the receipt and adequacy of which
are hereby acknowledged by each of the parties hereto, the parties hereby agree as follows:

     1.   Section 2 of the Consulting Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety as follows:

          "The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date the stockholders of Zero's
Mr. Submarine, Inc., a Virginia corporation ("Zeros"), approve the terms and conditions of that
certain Asset  Purchase Agreement, by and among the Company, Schmidt, Martin Palacios, John
Schmidt and X.S., Inc., and shall continue for a period of five (5) years thereafter (the "Term")."

     2.   Subject to the modification set forth herein, the Consulting Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement as of the date first
set forth above.

                                   AMERICAN KIOSK CORP.



                                   By:
                                             Larry E. Graybill, Chief Financial Officer


                                   _______________________________________
                                   Eugene T. Schmidt
</TABLE>