alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of CEO**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United StatesCode), the undersigned officer of Gateway, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Gateway”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

a) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”) of Gateway fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

b) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gateway. 

Dated: August 3, 2007 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Form 10-Q pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Gateway, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
EXHIBIT 10.6

                         AMERIFIRST FUNDING GROUP, INC.
                         1712-H Osborne Road, Suite 107
                            St. Marys, Georgia 31558

                                                               December 26, 2002

AmeriFirst Fund I, LLC
1712-H Osborne Road
St. Marys, Georgia 31558

Ladies and Gentleman:

      This letter shall serve to confirm and memorialize our agreement that
AmeriFirst Fund I, LLC (the "Fund") shall provide to us proceeds received from
the public offer and sale of units of membership interest in the Fund. The
proceeds shall be derived pursuant to the Fund's registration statement on Form
S-1 (the "Registration Statement"), for the sole purpose of purchasing life
insurance policies (the "Policies") as set forth in the Registration Statement.
The signature of such Registration Statement by the Fund shall constitute
conclusive evidence of the Fund's agreement to provide the funds, and we hereby
agree to use such proceeds to purchase the Policies, either directly from the
insured, if we are licensed as a broker, or through an unaffiliated broker
referral network. We further agree that we shall sell and transfer to the Fund
all of our right, title and interest to the Policies purchased with such
proceeds, in accordance with and subject to any agreements now or hereinafter in
effect either between us and the Fund or between us and any insured or
unaffiliated broker. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Fund hereby acknowledges
and we hereby agree to sell Policies only to the Fund; provided, however, we may
purchase Policies and sell them to entities other than the Fund only on a
non-securitized basis, and provided that the monies we use to purchase such
Polices are not proceeds received from the Fund either in connection with its
public offering or subsequently.

      If the foregoing accurately reflects our agreement with respect to the
foregoing, please indicate such by signing in the space indicated for such
below.

                                Very truly yours,

                                AmerFirst Funding Group, Inc., as Provider


                                By: /s/ John Tooke
                                   -----------------------------------------
                                   John Tooke, Chief Executive Officer

Acknowledged and accepted as of the date first set forth above:

AmeriFirst Fund I, LLC

By: AmeriFirst Financial Services, Inc., Manager


By: /s/ John Tooke
   -------------------------------------
    John Tooke, Chief Executive Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 40581 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JUAN OLIVARES

- ESTRADA, also known as Enrique Olivera, also known as Juan Olivares , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:14

- CR

- 729

- 1

Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Juan Olivares

- Estrada has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Olivares

- Estrada has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 1 5 , 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-40581 Document: 00513308591 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/15/2015No. 15

- 40581

2 Olivares

- Estrada ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the

a ppeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-40581 Document: 00513308591 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/15/2015
DRAFT **MEMO TO RECORD**

**Date: 5/**  **16 /2014**  **To: CWA Section 316(b) Existing Facility Rulemaking Record**  **From: Paul Shriner, PhD., U.S. EPA, Office of Water, OST**  **Subject :**  **Late Public Comments** In the NPDES Cooling Water Intake Structures at Existing Facilities and Phase I Facilities p roposed r

ule (76 FR 22174

- 22288; April 20, 2011) EPA initially provide d a 90

- day public comment period , which was subsequentl y extended to 120 day s in a reopening public comment notice based on requests by various stakeholders for additional time to submit comments. ( 76 FR 43230

- 43231 ; July

20, 2011 ). The reopening public comment period notice expressly stated that “[c] omments on the proposed rule, which was published April 20, 2011, at 76 FR 22174, must be received on or before August 18, 2011. ” (76 FR 43230). EPA also issued two Notices of Data Availability

(NODA) in mid

- June 2011 that described flexibilities EPA considered as part of the impingement mortality

limitations (77 FR 34315

- 34326; June 11, 2012) and that described the preliminary

results of survey s of households’ willingness to pay for incremental reductions in fish mortality

( 77 FR 34927

- 34931 ; June 12, 2012). Each of these NODAs expressly provided for a 30

- day

public comment period. (77 FR 34315; 77 FR 34927). Despite the clear deadlines for public comment and the additional time provided for the submission of comments on the proposed rule, EPA has received publ ic comments on the proposed rule that are late (i.e. were received following the published deadlines) including some that were received at an extremely late stage of the rulemaking process, well after the close of all comment periods . As the Agency has previousl y indicated in response to comment , EPA has no legal obligation to respond to such late comments. See e.g., Personal Watercraft v. Dept. of Commerce, 48 F.3d 540 (D.C. Cir. 1995). Nevertheless, EPA has attempted to respond to these comments to the extent possible given the schedule for the rule.
§ 1215.4 Notice requirements. ( a ) Deductions shall not be made unless the employee is provided with written notice signed by the Chairman of the debt at least 30 days before salary offset commences.
( b ) The written notice shall contain: ( 1 ) A statement that the debt is owed and an explanation of its nature, and amount;
( 2 ) The agency's intention to collect the debt by deducting from the employee's current disposable pay account;
( 3 ) The amount, frequency proposed beginning date, and duration of the intended deduction(s);
( 4 ) An explanation of interest, penalties, and administrative charges, including a statement that such charges will be assessed unless excused in accordance with the Federal Claims Collections Standards at 4 CFR 101.1 *et seq.;*
( 5 ) The employee's right to inspect, request, or receive a copy of government records relating to the debt;
( 6 ) The opportunity to establish a written schedule for the voluntary repayment of the debt;
( 7 ) The right to a hearing conducted by an impartial hearing official;
( 8 ) The methods and time period for petitioning for hearings;
( 9 ) A statement that the timely filing of a petition for a hearing will stay the commencement of collection proceedings;
( 10 ) A statement that a final decision on the hearing will be issued not later than 60 days after the filing of the petition requesting the hearing unless the employee requests and the hearing official grants a delay in the proceedings;
( 11 ) A statement that knowingly false or frivolous statements, representations, or evidence may subject the employee to appropriate disciplinary procedures;
( 12 ) A statement of other rights and remedies available to the employee under statutes or regulations governing the program for which the collection is being made; and
( 13 ) Unless there are contractual or statutory provisions to the contrary, a statement that amounts paid on or deducted for the debt which are later waived or found not owed to the United States will be promptly refunded to the employee.
#### § 111.66 Failure to appear.

If the broker or his attorney fails to appear for a scheduled hearing, the hearing officer designated pursuant to § 111.67(a) will proceed with the hearing as scheduled and will hear evidence submitted by the parties. The provisions of this part will apply as though the broker were present, and the Executive Assistant Commissioner may issue an order of suspension of the license or permit for a specified period of time or revocation of the license or permit, or assessment of a monetary penalty in lieu of suspension or revocation, in accordance with § 111.74 if he finds that action to be in order.

[T.D. 00-17, 65 FR 13891, Mar. 15, 2000, as amended by CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63320, Oct. 18, 2022]
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GLOBAL EPOINT, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Toresa Lou, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 20, 2006



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|                                   
|/S/    TORESA
LOU                  
|Toresa Lou, Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GLOBAL EPOINT, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Pan, Chief Financial Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 20, 2006



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|                                              
|/S/    JOHN
PAN                               
|John Pan, Chief Financial Officer and Chairman

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Edith Stoll, Appellant, v. Robert E. Stoll, Defendant.

Present- — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
Order entered September 19, 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 00378

- CV

TODD PRUETT, Appellant

V.

MARK STOLZ, ET AL.

, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 07463



### O RDER

We DENY appellant’s September 13, 2013 motion requesting the Court to stop posting

documents and information on our website.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS

JUSTICE
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13a-15 OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of U.S. Can Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions);
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Michael M. RajkovicMichael M. RajkovicExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-04-0044 - Proposed Pilot Program for the use of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Enforcement Program

Accession Number: ML040550442

Date Released: Friday, March 26, 2004

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML040550454 - SECY-04-0044 - Proposed Pilot for the Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Enforcement Program (7 page(s), 3/12/2004)
    - ML040550473 - SECY-04-0044-Attachment- FRN - Pilot Program on the Use of ADR in the Enforcement Program Request for Comments (13 page(s), 2/24/2004)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
## Court of Appeals

Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler



## B I L L O F C O S T S

Court of Appeals No. 12-14-00343-CV

Trial Court No. 2014C-0199

Carole Ann Wallace

Vs.

Barbara Louise Hernandez

DOCUMENTS FILED AMOUNT FEE PAID BY

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

Indigent

Required Texas.gov efiling fee

Filing $50.00

$25.00

$20.00

$100.00 Carole Ann Wallace

Carole Ann Wallace

Carole Ann Wallace

Carole Ann Wallace

TOTAL: $195.00

I, Cathy S. Lusk, Clerk of the Court of Appeals, Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler,

Texas, certify that the above copy of the Bill of Costs is true and correct. GIVEN UNDER MY

HAND AND SEAL OF SAID COURT, at Tyler, this 8th day of July 2015

, A.D.

CATHY LUSK, CLERK

By:

_____________________________ Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk
§ 1630.12 Action on request to amend a record. ( a ) For TSP records, the record keeper will acknowledge a request for amendment of a record, which is to be decided by that office in accordance with the chart in § 1630.11, within 10 work days. Requests received by the record keeper which are to be decided by the current or former employing agency will be sent to that agency by the record keeper within 3 work days of the date of receipt. A copy of the transmittal letter will be sent to the requester.
( b ) For non-TSP records, the Privacy Act Officer will acknowledge a request for amendment of a record within 10 work days of the date the Board receives it. If a decision cannot be made within this time, the requester will be informed by mail of the reasons for the delay and the date when a reply can be expected, normally within 30 work days from receipt of the request.
( c ) The final response will include the decision whether to grant or deny the request. If the request is denied, the response will include: ( 1 ) The reasons for the decision;
( 2 ) The name and address of the official to whom an appeal should be directed;
( 3 ) The name and address of the official designated to assist the individual in preparing the appeal;
( 4 ) A description of the appeal process with the Board; and
( 5 ) A description of any other procedures which may be required of the individual in order to process the appeal.
[55 FR 18852, May 7, 1990, as amended at 64 FR 67695, Dec. 3, 1999]
,EO S7

I

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION JX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 941 05-3901

SEP 30 2014

The Honorable Jeffrey Lee, Chairperson

Cold Springs Rancheria of Mono Indians of California

P.O. Box 209

Tollhouse, California 93667

Dear Chairperson Lee:

Pursuant to Executive Order 13 175 and the EPA Policy on Consultation and Coordination with Indian

Tribes, I would like to invite the Cold Springs Rancheria of Mono indians of California to engage in

government-to-government consultation on action EPA is considering to reclassi1’ the San Joaquin Valley

nonattainment area from Moderate nonattainment to Serious nonattainment for two National Ambient Air

Quality Standards (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5).

The San Joaquin Valley is currently classified Moderate nonattainment for two PM2.5NAAQS established in

1997 and 2006. EPA is evaluating air quality and modeling analyses regarding the ability ofthe San Joaquin

Valley to attain the 1997 and the 2006 PM2.5NAAQS by the applicable attainment dates for each standard.

Consistent with these evaluations, EPA is also considering action to reclassify the San Joaquin Valley as

Serious nonattainment for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5NAAQS. These reclassification actions would establish

new attainment dates and outline new air quality planning requirements.

These reclassifications would also lower the applicable “major source” thresholds for the purposes ofthe

nonattainment new source review program and the Title V operating permit program from its current level of

100 tons per year (tpy) to 70 tpy, potentially’ subjecting more stationary sources to these requirements. The

reclassifications may also lower the de minimis threshold for the Clean Air Act’s General Conformity

requirement from 100 tpy to 70 tpy. Under the General Conformity requirement, Federal agencies bear the

responsibility of determining conformity of actions in nonattainment and maintenance areas that require

Federal permits, approvals, or funding.

To ensure that the interests and concerns ofthe Cold Springs Rancheria of Mono Indians of California are

considered, I would like to invite you or your designated consultation representative to engage in

government-to-government consultation with EPA. To request further information, or to initiate consultation,

please have your staff contact Mr. Kerry Drake, Associate Director, Air Division, at (415) 947-4157 or by’

electronic mail at drake.kerryepa.gov. If you desire government-to-government consultation with EPA. we

respectfully request that you notify’ us by October 27, 2014. Thank you and I look forward to receiving your

input.

Sincerely,

eborah Jordan

Director, Air Division

cc: Jamie Smith, EPA Manager

Prinwd oii i?’’u ‘let] Piper