alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Initial Review Group. Subcommittee A—Cancer Centers.                     

*Date:*                         December 10, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Marriott Conference Centers, 5701 Marinelli Road, North Bethesda, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         David E. Maslow, PhD., Scientific Review Administrator, Resources and Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Blvd., Room 8117, Bethesda, MD 20892-7405, (301) 496-2330.                    

      ( print page 62708)    
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Causes and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 29, 2004.

Laverne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-23975  Filed 10-26-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 22

- 50558 Summary Calendar

**Billy Ray Jackson,**

Plaintiff

— Appellant **,**

versus

**Bryan Daniel, in his individual capacity; Julian Alvarez, III, in his individual capacity; Aaron**  **Demerson, in his individual capacity,**

Defendants

— Appellees

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:21

- CV

- 1107

Before **Jones, Haynes,** and **Oldham,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
Billy Ray Jackson filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in forma pauperis contesting Texas’s withdrawal, under 15 U.S.C. § 9025(a)(1), from the supplemental unemployment benefits provided under the CARES Act.

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 28, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-50558 Document: 00516487024 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/28/2022No. 22

- 50558

2 Given that the statute expressly allows such a withdrawal upon providing thirty days’ written notice (which Texas did), t he district court dismissed the case under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Jackson’s appellate brief fails to demonstrate any error in this determination. We **AFFIRM.** Jackson’s motion for appoint ment of counsel is **DENIED.** Case: 22-50558 Document: 00516487024 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/28/2022
### §§286 to 286g. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §208, Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1742

Section 286, based on H. Res. No. 988, §203(a), Ninety-third Congress, Oct. 8, 1974, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 93–554, title I, ch. III, §101, Dec. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1777, established Legislative Classification Office in House of Representatives.

Section 286a, based on H. Res. No. 988, §203(b), Ninety-third Congress, Oct. 8, 1974, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 93–554, title I, ch. III, §101, Dec. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1777, related to purpose and policy of Legislative Classification Office.

Section 286b, based on H. Res. No. 988, §203(c), Ninety-third Congress, Oct. 8, 1974, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 93–554, title I, ch. III, §101, Dec. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1777, related to functions of Legislative Classification Office.

Section 286c, based on H. Res. No. 988, §203(d), Ninety-third Congress, Oct. 8, 1974, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 93–554, title I, ch. III, §101, Dec. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1777, related to functions and appointment of Staff Director of Legislative Classification Office.

Section 286d, based on H. Res. No. 988, §203(e), Ninety-third Congress, Oct. 8, 1974, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 93–554, title I, ch. III, §101, Dec. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1777, related to appointment of staff, Deputy Staff Director, and delegation of functions of Legislative Classification Office.

Section 286e, based on H. Res. No. 988, §203(f), Ninety-third Congress, Oct. 8, 1974, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 93–554, title I, ch. III, §101, Dec. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1777, related to compensation of Staff Director and staff of Legislative Classification Office.

Section 286f, based on H. Res. No. 988, §203(g), Ninety-third Congress, Oct. 8, 1974, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 93–554, title I, ch. III, §101, Dec. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1777, related to expenditures of Legislative Classification Office.

Section 286g, based on H. Res. No. 988, §203(h), Ninety-third Congress, Oct. 8, 1974, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 93–554, title I, ch. III, §101, Dec. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1777, provided that contingent fund of House was available to carry out this chapter.
#### William L. Bromberg v. Les Coff Realty Corp.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See 278 App. Div. 796.]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 23, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50437 Conference Calendar

LEE ROGER SIMPSON, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus THOMAS B. SEHON; KATHRYN J. “JODY” GILLIAM; LESLIE B. VANCE, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-01-CV-185

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Lee Roger Simpson, Texas prisoner # 642385, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Simpson’s motion to expedite the appeal is DENIED. The district court determined that Simpson’s action was barred by Texas’s two-year statute of limitations, and that this would constitute Simpson’s third strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).No. 02-50437 -2- Simpson argues generally that the district court abused procedures to defeat his damage claims against the defendants, but he does not mention or make any specific arguments concerning the basis of the district court’s dismissal that his claims were barred by the statute of limitations. Simpson does not address the merits of the district court's opinion. Failure to identify any error in the district court's analysis or application to the facts of the case is the same as if the appellant had not appealed that judgment. Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Simpson’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. This court dismissed Simpson’s appeal as frivolous in Simpson v. Pamplin , No. 96-50794 (5th Cir. Apr. 9, 1998). The district court dismissed Simpson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous in Simpson v. Amos , No. 98-CV-338 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 24, 1998). His appeal in that case, No. 98-41521, was dismissed for failure to pay the docketing fee and to comply with the district court’s order requiring authorization consent forms. Thus, the district court’s dismissal as frivolous in that case stands as a strike. The district court’s dismissal as frivolous in this case, and this court’s dismissal of this appeal as frivolous constitute his third and fourth strikes. Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 1996). Therefore, Simpson is nowNo. 02-50437 -3- barred from proceeding IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) while incarcerated. APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) BAR IMPOSED; MOTION TO EXPEDITE APPEAL DENIED.
Presidential Documents

61989

Federal Register 

Vol. 69, No. 203

Thursday, October 21, 2004

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 7834 of October 18, 2004

National Character Counts Week, 2004

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation

Individuals have the power to do much good, and great societies are built 

by knowing the difference between right and wrong. People of character 

strengthen our country through their daily actions. To help children fulfill 

their potential and build a more hopeful future for our Nation, we must 

continue to encourage and support the character development of our young 

people and support the institutions that give direction and purpose: our 

families, our schools, and our faith-based and community organizations. 

Americans of all ages continue to inspire others with their compassion 

and decency by giving their time to faith-based and community organizations 

and bringing hope to others at home and around the world. The Senior 

Corps has more than 500,000 caring souls serving in its programs; the 

Peace Corps has grown to its highest number of volunteers in 28 years; 

and AmeriCorps will grow by 50 percent to 75,000 members this year. 

Almost two million students volunteer each year through the Learn and 

Serve America programs, which incorporate community service as a vital 

part of education. In addition, more than 1,300 communities have formed 

Citizen Corps Councils; over 10,000 communities have registered Neighborhood Watch programs; more than 27,000 Americans are serving in the Medical Reserve Corps; over 52,000 citizens have completed Community Emergency Response Team training; and there are more than 68,000 volunteers 

in the Volunteers in Police Service program. The true strength of America 

lies in the hearts and souls of its citizens, and these volunteers are making 

our country better and stronger. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 17 through 

October 23, 2004, as National Character Counts Week. I call upon public 

officials, educators, librarians, parents, students, and all Americans to observe 

this week with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighteenth day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand four, and of the IndependVerDate jul<14>2003 17:24 Oct 20, 2004 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4705 Sfmt 4790 E:\FR\FM\21OCD0.SGM 21OCD0

[FR Doc. 04–23777

Filed 10–20–04; 9:31 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 

ence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-ninth.

W
### §528. Waiver and relinquishment of mineral rights

The owner or owners of any mining claim heretofore located may, at any time prior to issuance of patent therefor, waive and relinquish all rights thereunder to Leasing Act minerals. The execution and acknowledgment of such a waiver and relinquishment by such owner or owners and the recordation thereof in the office where the notice or certificate of location of such mining claim is of record shall render such mining claim thereafter subject to the reservation referred to in section 524 of this title and any patent issued therefor shall contain such a reservation, but no such waiver or relinquishment shall be deemed in any manner to constitute any concession as to the date of priority of rights under said mining claim or as to the validity thereof.

(Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 730, §8, 68 Stat. 715.)
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-03-024 May 23, 2003

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC PROPOSES $6,000 FINE FOR GLOBAL X - RAY AND TESTING CORP.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a fine of $6,000 against

Global X-Ray and Testing Corporation of Morgan City, Louisiana, for violating NRC

administrative and radioactive material handling requirements.

In a letter to the company, Ellis W. Merschoff, Administrator of the NRC’s Region IV

office in Arlington, Texas, said that as a result of an NRC inspection which ended in February,

the agency determined that the company willfully violated certain NRC requirements associated

with the handling of radioactive materials. During an inspection conducted in offshore waters in

the Gulf of Mexico, an NRC inspector found a radiography device, left “unsecured and

uncontrolled in an unrestricted area” on a oil well platform. Radiography is a non-destructive

testing method which uses a sealed radiation source to make x-ray like images of heavy metal

objects like pumps, valves, and pipes. The company’s radiographer and his assistant were on

another platform asleep. 

“Our review found that the radiographer and his assistant were very tired from working

their first night shift, just prior to the NRC inspector’s arrival,” Merschoff said. “Because of his

fatigue and the difficulty in transporting the device to the platform with the darkroom, the

radiographer (at about 4:30 a.m.) decided to leave the device on the platform where they had

been working recognizing it was unsecured and uncontrolled. Accordingly, the NRC has

concluded that the radiographer engaged in deliberate misconduct. Although he failed to secure

or control the device, the source was locked in the shielded position and the radiographer took

the key with him.”

The company has taken corrective actions by discussing the incident with other

radiographers to stress the importance of securing industrial radiographic devices and of

following radiation safety procedures, disciplining the radiographer, discussing with its clients

the importance of having the darkroom on the same platform where work is being performed or
of having a storage box available for securing the device, and increasing onsite surveillance of

the safety practices of its radiographers.

The NRC has classified the one violation as a Severity Level III violation, which carries a

$6,000 fine. The agency uses a four-level severity scale in which Severity Level I is the most

serious. The company has 30 days from receipt of the letter to either pay the civil penalty or to

challenge imposition of the fine.

The NRC’s letter, its enclosures, and the company’s response will be made available to

interested members of the public through the agency’s public electronic reading room at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Help in accessing these documents is available from

the NRC Public Document Room at (301) 415-4737 or at 1-800-397-4209.

###
ATTACHMENT “A”

Scheduling Timeline For Standard Track Cases

DATE EVENT

June 30, 2021

Deadline to join additional parties or to amend pleadings.

July 13, 2021 The parties shall exchange expert witness summaries or reports.

June 30, 2021

Deadline to complete fact discovery.

July 20, 2021 Deadline to complete mediation.

August 3, 2021 Motions due including Motions In Limine and Dispositive Motions

October 25, 2021

Deadline to file joint pretrial stipulation pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(e) 

and pretrial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

Case 0:20-cv-61693-WPD Document 13-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020 Page 1 of 2
26(a)(3).

One Week prior to 

Calendar Call

Deadline to file proposed jury instructions (if the matter is set for a jury 

trial) or proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law (if the matter 

is set for a bench trial) pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(k).

Beginning of 

November 2021

Two-week trial period commences (calendar call will be scheduled on 

the Tuesday before the trial period)

Case 0:20-cv-61693-WPD Document 13-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/01/2020 Page 2 of 2
### **CHAPTER 71—JOINT FUNDING SIMPLIFICATION**

Sec.
7101.
Purposes.
7102.
Definitions.
7103.
Authority of the President and heads of executive agencies.
7104.
Processing project requests to be financed by at least 2 assistance programs.
7105.
Prescribing uniform technical and administrative provisions.
7106.
Delegation of supervision of assistance.
7107.
Joint management funds.
7108.
Limitation on authority under sections 7105–7107.
7109.
Appropriations available for joint financing.
7110.
Use of joint financing provisions for Federal-State assisted projects.
7111.
Report to Congress.
7112.
Expiration date.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-135 November 22, 2002

 

NRC APPROVES POWER UPRATE FOR PEACH BOTTOM NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a request by Exelon Generation

Company to increase the generating capacity of the Peach Bottom nuclear power plant by 1.62 percent.

The power uprate at the plant, located in Delta, Pennsylvania, will increase the generating

capacity of both units from 1093 megawatts electric to 1110. The licensee intends to implement the

power uprate immediately.

NRC published a notice about the power uprate application in the Federal Register providing

the public an opportunity to comment or request a hearing. No requests were made for a hearing.

 The NRC’s safety evaluation of the requested power uprate for the plant focused on several

areas, including nuclear steam supply systems, instrumentation and control systems, electrical systems,

accident evaluations, radiological consequences, operations, and other technical specification changes.

The NRC staff determined that the licensee could safely increase the power output of the reactor

primarily through increased feedwater flow measurement accuracy.

###
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1450 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1450

 To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to permit the Council 
     of the District of Columbia to impose a tax on the income of 
 professional baseball players which is earned within the District of 
                               Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2003

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to permit the Council 
     of the District of Columbia to impose a tax on the income of 
 professional baseball players which is earned within the District of 
                               Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITTING COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TO IMPOSE 
              INCOME TAX ON VISITING PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL PLAYERS.

    Section 602(a)(5) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 
1-206.02(a)(5), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking ``not a 
resident of the District'' and inserting the following: ``not a 
resident of the District, except that the Council may impose such a tax 
on such an individual to the extent that the income is derived from 
services rendered within the District as a member of a professional 
baseball team''.
                                 <all>
```
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

Board of Directors
Community First Bancorporation

         We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  into the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-71401) filed by Community First Bancorporation in
connection  with the Community First  Bancorporation  1998 Stock Option Plan and
into the Registration  Statement on Form S-8 (No.  333-66097) filed by Community
First  Bancorporation in connection with the Community First Bancorporation 1989
Stock Option Plan, of our Report dated  February 4, 1999,  included in Community
First Bancorporation's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 1998.

                                             s/Donald G. Jones and Company, P.A.
                                             Donald G. Jones and Company, P.A

Columbia, South Carolina
March 18, 1999
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of CFO**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Gateway, Inc., a Delawarecorporation (“Gateway”), does hereby certify that: 

 

a) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q”) of Gateway fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

 

b) The information contained inthe Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gateway. 

 

Dated: November 8, 2005