Issue Date: 06/06/02 - 1 - 0312

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL NMSS/PMDA

MANUAL CHAPTER 0312 

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR RADIATION SAFETY INSPECTIONS

AT NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE FACILITIES AND MATERIALS LICENSEES’ SITES

0312-01 PURPOSE

To provide direction to the regional offices and Headquarters for acquiring technical

assistance for the radiation safety inspection program for fuel cycle facilities and materials 

licensees.

0312-02 OBJECTIVES

02.01 Provide uniform policy and procedures and define responsibilities and authorities

in the execution of technical assistance for radiation safety inspections, surveys, and 

evaluations. 

02.02 Establish a proper channel of communication among the regional offices, the Office 

of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards (NMSS) Technical Project Manager (TPM), the 

NMSS Technical Assistance Project Manager (TAPM), user divisions within NMSS, the

Department of Energy (DOE) laboratories, and the DOE operations offices. 

0312-03 DEFINITIONS

03.01 DOE Laboratories. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) and 

Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML), hereinafter referred to in this document 

as the “DOE lab contractor(s),” are the two DOE labs with whom NRC has established 

interagency agreements for the performance of this work. 

03.02 Technical Assistance. Technical work will be conducted at the DOE laboratories 

or at the licensee facility, to support radiation safety inspections. The work can include,

but is not limited to: (1) planning, conduct, and documentation of radiological surveys, 

including closeout surveys; (2) collection and radiological analysis of samples of soil, water,

air, and other material; and (3) assessment of technical work performed for regional offices

and Headquarters, to support the conduct of radiation safety inspections, surveys, and 

evaluations. However, under the governing Interagency Agreements, ORISE and EML are 

not expected to perform radiation exposure pathway and dose/risk analyses.

0312-04 RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITIES

04.01 NMSS. Administers the program.
0312 - 2 - Issue Date: 06/06/02

 04.02 NMSS TPM

 a. Reviews and submits to the TAPM for issuance, Requests for Technical Assistance

(RFTA), Modifications to Requests for Technical Assistance (RFTAMOD), and

 Survey Plan Approval Form (SPAF) forms submitted by regional

 inspectors/licensing project managers and headquarters project managers.

Performs technical reviews of requests and ensures consistency, with NMSS policy,

 of site work.

 b. Ensures that contract costs do not exceed authorized funding and manages cost

 control of each task assignment. 

 c. Negotiates priorities of the DOE lab contractors’ assignments, if necessary.

 d. Reviews monthly progress and cost reports.

 e. Reviews survey, test, analysis, and other contractor reports, as appropriate.

 f. Prepares technical documentation in RFTA, RFTAMOD, and SPAF forms.

 g. Reviews and oversees quality assurance (QA) / quality control aspects of the DOE

 lab contractors’ work and coordinates and oversees QA audit activities by

inspectors and licensing project managers.

 h. Ensures the validity of all docket numbers, Technical Assignment Control (TAC)

 numbers and/or Inspection Report (IR) numbers, prior to the approval and issuance

 of each RFTA.

04.03 NMSS TAPM

 a. Reviews and issues RFTA, RFTAMOD, and SPAF forms submitted by regional

 inspectors/licensing project managers and headquarters project managers (see

Exhibits 1 - 3).

 b. Ensures that contract costs do not exceed authorized funding and manages cost

 control of each task assignment.

 c. Negotiates priorities of the DOE lab contractors’ assignments, if necessary.

d. Reviews monthly progress and cost reports.

e. Approves bills and invoices.

 f. Initiates task closeout authorizations.

 04.04 Branch Chief. Authorizes RFTA, RFTAMOD, and SPAF forms and ensures that

 the technical assistance involves activities that are appropriate to be assigned to the DOE

 lab contractors. Additionally, authorizes RFTA forms for emergency work requests.

 Emergency work requests (surveys required with less than 2 weeks notice) are defined as

 those where there are potential health and safety effects of delaying the survey and/or,

 where the survey is needed, to allay public fears arising from perceptions of the health risks

 involved. Emergency work requests that result from improper NRC planning or

 unreasonable licensee requests should be avoided as this will greatly affect the DOE lab

 contractors’ ability to efficiently and economically manage its workload.
Issue Date: 06/06/02 - 3 - 0312

04.06 Regional Inspector and Headquarters’/Regional Licensing Project Manager 

a. Determines the nature, extent, and schedule of technical assistance needed to

support the radiation safety inspection program.

b. Contacts the contractor to coordinate and establish the schedule for the technical 

assistance tasks.

c. Prepares RFTA and RFTAMOD forms (Exhibits 1 and 2). 

d. Approves SPAF forms (Exhibit 3). 

e. Obtains authorizations from Branch Chief and Division Director (when applicable).

f. Mails or telefaxes signed RFTA to NMSS TPM after coordinating action by 

telephone or e-mail. 

g. Accompanies the applicable DOE lab contractor’s staff to licensee's site and 

facilities to coordinate and facilitate the required radiological (scoping and 

confirmatory) surveys. 

h. Reviews and evaluates results of the DOE lab contractors’ work. 

i. Corresponds with licensee on the sequence of events that are part of the survey

process (see Exhibit 4 for an example).

0312-05 PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION

Changes were made in 1991 to this manual chapter to implement the Omnibus Budget 

Reconciliation Act of 1990 for recovery of approximately 100 percent of NRC’s budget 

authority, less amounts appropriated from the Nuclear Waste Fund and the General Fund. 

During FY2001-2005, the fee recovery requirement will be decreased by 2% per year to 

alleviate NRC’s fairness and equity concerns of charging licensees for Agency expenses 

that do not provide a direct benefit to them. It is NRC's responsibility to ensure the proper 

accounting of DOE lab contractor costs and that costs are reasonable and justified. This 

should reduce the frequency of contested fees from our licensees and provide an adequate

paper trail.

We have also enclosed a letter (Exhibit 4) that we believe is a good example of the type

of information that NRC should be supplying to licensees to let them know, early, the types 

of charges they will be assessed. This type of correspondence should reduce inquiries

when the fee bills are submitted for payment to licensees. 

The procedures for the performance of a radiological survey generally consist of the

following steps:

a. Regions or Headquarters identify the need to perform a survey at a particular site.

b. Regional Inspectors or Headquarters/Regional Licensing Project Managers prepare 

a RFTA form, which is submitted to Headquarters for approval, and then forwarded

to the applicable DOE lab contractor. 

c. RFTA forms identified as fee-recoverable must contain a docket number, and a 

Technical Assignment Control (TAC) number, or IR number. These unique 

identifiers allow the DOE lab contractor to report costs incurred by licensee, by 

licensing action or inspection, and by task via the monthly letter status reports. 
0312 - 4 - Issue Date: 06/06/02

Contractual costs are later recovered from the licensee after verification and

approval for billing by the Headquarters’ TAPM.

 d. The DOE lab contractor reviews documentation on the site to be surveyed, visits

the site and performs a scoping survey, when necessary. Regional Inspectors or

 Headquarters Regional Licensing Project Managers are responsible for ensuring

 that the DOE lab contractor receives the required documentation. The documenta-

 tion should be provided to the DOE lab Contractor at least 14 calendar days before

the preliminary site visit and at least 30 calendar days before the survey.

 e. The DOE lab contractor prepares a survey plan based on its site visit and review

 of licensee information. The DOE lab contractor’s cost estimates will be prepared

and the basis for the costs will be provided as part of the survey plan.

 f. The Regional Inspector or Headquarters/Regional Licensing Project Manager

 reviews the survey plan and submits a completed SPAF, (Exhibit 3) to the

 Headquarters TPM. When the survey plan is approved, the level of effort estimate

 provided by the DOE lab contractor in the survey plan is considered to be fixed.

 The DOE lab contractor will not be able to perform the survey without NRC approval

of the survey plan.

 Any changes that Regional Inspector or Headquarters/Regional Licensing Project

 Manager make, after survey plan approval, that would affect survey cost, should

 be submitted to the NMSS TPM for review and subsequent submittal to the DOE

 lab contractor for a revised cost estimate, via an RFTAMOD (Exhibit 2). However,

 to allow for efficient and economical survey planning, the Regional Inspectors

 should provide sufficient guidance to the DOE lab contractor at the survey plan

 stage.



 Based on input from the DOE lab contractor, the regional inspectors have the

 flexibility to make some changes to the survey plan, in the field, because of

extenuating circumstances that may arise during the performance of the survey.

 For changes that are made that affect the total cost estimate by less than 10

 percent, the regional inspector is authorized to allow the DOE lab contractor to

proceed with the work without prior Headquarters approval. For changes that

increase the cost by greater than 10 percent, the inspector must obtain Headquar-

 ters TPM approval before the DOE lab contractor can perform the additional work.

 Where any additional cost will be incurred, it is the responsibility of the Regional

 Inspector to prepare and submit a RFTAMOD to the Headquarters TPM as soon

as practicable. 

 g. The DOE lab contractor performs the survey and prepares a draft survey report,

 for NRC comment (Regional Inspectors or Headquarters/Regional Licensing Project

Managers prepare comments).

 h. The DOE lab contractor prepares final survey report and submits to NRC.

i. NRC issues the final report to the licensee.

 j. Quarterly, the Regional Inspector or the Headquarters/Regional Licensing Project

Manager will be requested to verify the accuracy of the TAC number or IR number

 on licensee fee reports generated by the Division of Resource Management and

 Administration for the respective regions, or by the Program Analysis Team for

NMSS Headquarters' staff (see Exhibit 5). Accurate identification of docket

numbers, TAC numbers, or IR numbers ensures that the contractual costs

associated with NRC staff effort are billed to the correct licensee, for the correct

licensing action or inspection. 
Issue Date: 06/06/02 - 5 - 0312

k. The Regional Inspector or the Headquarters/Regional Licensing Project Manager 

are not requested to verify the accuracy of the dollar amounts appearing on the

license fee billing reports generated quarterly since this task is performed by the

Headquarters’ TAPM. The Headquarters’ TAPM will not process incomplete RFTA

or RFTAMODs. (Note: The DOE lab contractors cannot perform work without 

approval from the Headquarters’ TPM and the TAPM.) 

l. Background information used to support the fees levied against licensees is to be

retained for a period of 6 years and 3 months, so that any contested fees can be

substantiated.

m. Licensees are to address all billing requests in writing to the Office of the Controller, 

License Fee and Debt Collection Branch (LFDCB). LFDCB will coordinate with the

offices and prepare an appropriate response to the licensee. If the licensee 

disputes an invoice, staff should not respond directly to the licensee without

concurrence from LFDCB.

END

Exhibits:

1. Request for Technical Assistance (RFTA)

2. Modification To Request Technical Assistance (RFTAMOD)

3. Confirmatory Radiological Survey Plan

 Approval Form (SPAF)

4. Sample Licensee Notification Letter 

5. Sample License and Inspection Fee Billing Reports

 Includes Contractual Costs
Issue Date: 06/06/02 E1-1 0312 Exhibit 1

Exhibit 1

NRC Form 305 

REQUEST FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (RFTA)



INSPECTOR/ORGANIZATION DATE 



TELEPHONE # RFTA# 

(Leave Blank) 



FACILITY NAME AND LOCATION 



DOCKET# FEE RECOVERABLE? YES NO 

TAC#/IR# 





DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED (Include schedule, use separate sheet if needed.) 











































AUTHORIZATION 





INSPECTOR DATE BRANCH CHIEF DATE 



EMERGENCY AUTHORIZATION 



EMERGENCY AUTHORIZATION (SEE INSPECTION CHAPTER 0312 FOR DEFINITION OF ACCEPTABLE EMERGENCY 

REQUESTS). EXPLAIN, ON SEPARATE SHEET, THE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE EMERGENCY REQUEST. (NOTE 

THAT THE REQUEST CANNOT BE PROCESSED WITHOUT THIS JUSTIFICATION.) 







BRANCH CHIEF DATE 



APPROVAL 





HQ TAPM DATE HQ TPM DATE 
Issue Date: 06/06/02 E2-1 0312 Exhibit 2

Exhibit 2



NRC Form 305 

MODIFICATION TO REQUEST FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (RFTAMOD) 



INSPECTOR/ORGANIZATION DATE 



TELEPHONE # RFTA MOD# 

(Leave Blank) 



FACILITY NAME AND LOCATION 



DOCKET# FEE RECOVERABLE? YES NO 

TAC#/IR# 



DESCRIPTION OF MODIFICATION: 



















JUSTIFICATION FOR MODIFICATION: 



















DISCUSSION OF COST IMPACT OF MODIFICATION: 





















AUTHORIZATION 







INSPECTOR DATE BRANCH CHIEF DATE 





APPROVAL 





HQ TAPM DATE HQ TPM DATE 
Issue Date: 06/06/02 E3-1 0312 Exhibit 3

Exhibit 3 

CONFIRMATORY RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY PLAN APPROVAL FORM (SPAF)

1. PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS. IF THERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS OR

CONCERNS ABOUT THE SURVEY PLAN, PLEASE STATE THEM IN THE AREA

DESIGNATED.

NAME/LOCATION OF SITE TO BE SURVEYED 

SURVEY

INSPECTOR REGION DATE(S) 

YES NO

*

A)IS THE SCOPE OF THE PROPOSED SURVEY AS PRESENTED

 IN THE SURVEY PLAN, REASONABLE AND ADEQUATE?

B) IS THE SAMPLING PROPOSED BY THE CONTRACTOR 

REASONABLE AND NECESSARY FOR PERFORMANCE OF THE SURVEY?

C) IS THE AMOUNT OF TIME NEEDED TO PERFORM THE SURVEY, 

AS STATED IN THE SURVEY PLAN, REASONABLE?

D) IS THE COST ESTIMATE PROVIDED TO PERFORM THE SURVEY

REASONABLE?

E) IS THE PROPOSED TIMING OF THE SURVEY SATISFACTORY?

2. *PLEASE EXPLAIN THE ANSWERS THAT ARE MARKED "NO" IN SECTION 1.

 USE SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY.

3. I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE SURVEY PLAN SUBMITTED BY ORISE

AND THAT THE PLAN IS (CIRCLE ONE):

A. ACCEPTABLE AS SUBMITTED.

B. ACCEPTABLE WITH MODIFICATIONS STATED ABOVE.

C. NOT ACCEPTABLE (THE CONTRACTOR MUST RESUBMIT FOR APPROVAL). 

INSPECTOR DATE

SUPERVISOR DATE

4. HEADQUARTERS APPROVAL

TAPM DATE TPM DATE 
Issue Date: 06/06/02 E4-1 0312 Exhibit 4

Exhibit 4

Docket No. [XXXXXXXX] License No. [xxxxxxx]

[ABC Company]

[Anytown], [USA]

SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF FEES ASSESSED FOR DECOMMISSIONING,

 DECONTAMINATION, RECLAMATION, OR SITE RESTORATION

 (TAC NO. [ ])

Dear Sirs:

As we discussed, in a recent telephone conversation about your request that a portion of the [XYZ]

site be released for unrestricted use, we understand that it is your intent to: (1) complete the

decommissioning and decontamination of that facility; (2) request that the entire facility be released

for unrestricted use; and (3) request that license [xxxxx] be terminated. Per amended 10 CFR Part

170, licensing actions and inspections of licenses authorizing decommissioning, decontamination,

reclamation, or site restoration activities will be charged the full Nuclear Regulatory Commission

(NRC) cost of such reviews.

The review of your request to release the [XYZ] site for unrestricted use will include technical review

by NRC staff and confirmatory surveys by an NRC DOE lab contractor, Oak Ridge Institute of 

Science and Education (ORISE) and/or Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML). NRC will 

bill you for the costs of both that survey and the charges for NRC staff time. 

The process for conducting a confirmatory survey using ORISE and/or EML includes: (1) NRC 

identification of the need for a contractor survey; (2) ORISE and/or EML review of relevant 

documentation on the site; (3) an ORISE and/or EML site visit, if necessary: (4) ORISE and/or EML 

preparation of a survey plan; (5) NRC review, modification (if needed), and approval of the survey 

plan; (6) NRC execution of the survey, preparation of a draft report, and NRC subsequent review 

and comment; (7) report revision; and (8) NRC issuance of the report to the licensee. 

During the survey phase, NRC and ORISE and/or EML are in close contact, so that survey findings 

can be quickly evaluated and the survey effort modified, as necessary. The purpose of this

independent survey is to help evaluate whether your survey

accurately reflects the conditions of the facility and to provide additional documentation that the

facility meets current criteria for release for unrestricted use.

The NRC objective is to obtain a satisfactory confirmatory survey at the lowest possible cost. Your

willingness to provide ORISE and/or EML access to the facility and provide such equipment as 

[name whatever is appropriate], etc., should contribute to a reduction in the billed cost for this work.

We will finalize the schedule for the survey of the [XYZ] site as soon as we have negotiated an

acceptable survey plan with ORISE and/or EML. 

Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated.

Sincerely,

[NRC Representative]

cc: NMSS Technical Project Monitor 

NMSS Technical Assistance Project Manager

END
Issue Date: 06/06/02 E5-1 0312 Exhibit 5

Exhibit 5 

SAMPLE LICENSE AND INSPECTION FEE BILLING REPORTS

INCLUDES CONTRACTUAL COSTS

 PAGE 1 - Summary for Billing Licensing Actions

DOCKET NO.: 0400XXXX

MEMORANDUM FOR: DIANE DANDOIS, CHIEF

 LICENSE FEE AND DEBT COLLECTION BRANCH

 DIVISION OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE

 OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER

FROM: LEAD REVIEWER NAME

 LICENSING BRANCH

 DIVISION OF FUEL CYCLE SAFETY

 AND SAFEGUARDS

 OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS SAFETY

 AND SAFEGUARDS

SUBJECT: COSTS AND STAFFHOURS FOR LICENSING

 ACTION

THE CONTRACT COSTS INCURRED AND STAFF HOURS USED IN REVIEWING THE APPLICATION DATED

07/01/95 ARE TABULATED BELOW FOR LICENSE NO SNM XXX.

1. FACILITY NAME: ABC COMPANY

2. CASEWORK CONTROL NO.: 0400XXXX010D

3. A) PERIOD COVERED: 07/01/95 - 09/30/95

 B) COMPLETION DATE: 09/30/95

 C) AMENDMENT NO: 12

4. CONTRACT COST: $16,102.00

5. STAFF HOURS: 22.0

6. STAFF HOUR COST: $ 2,586.00

7. TOTAL COST FOR PERIOD: $18,688.00

REVIEWED BY: 

 LEAD REVIEWER IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR 

ALL LEAD REVIEWERS

WORKING ON NMSS

FULL COST FEE CASES

MUST VERIFY THIS

REPORT EACH QUARTER AND FORWARD TO

THE OFFICE OF THE

CONTROLLER FOR BILLING.

This report is generated by

NMSS/PMDA and Regional

DRMA staff from RITS

based on information provided on NRC TAC Form

197C. 

Contact: 

Beverly Jones, NMSS or

your RITS Coordinator

Lead 

Reviewer, and immediate

supervisor sign report for

billing.

<

 PAGE 2 - Detail for Billing Licensing Actions

NMSS FEE SUMMARY REPORT

DETAIL LISTING OF HOURS/CONTRACT COSTS FOR CASEWORK

PERIOD COVERING: 07/01/95 TO 09/30/95

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

CASEWORK NUMBER: 0400XXXX010D

FACILITY NAME: ABC COMPANY

ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE: 09/30/95

ASSOCIATED TACS: L12384, L12385, L12386

TITLE: ABC COMPANY/DECOMMISSIONING REVIEW

COMMENT: LICENSE TERMINATED

REVIEWER WEEK ENDING TAC NUMBER REGULAR HOURS

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

J DOE 7/8/95 L12384 1.0

M HARRY 7/8/95 L12384 1.0

 SUBTOTAL HRS.: 2.0

 FEE @133/HR.: $266.00

J DOE 7/29/95 L12384 5.0

J DOE 7/29/95 L12385 5.0

M HARRY 8/26/95 L12385 6.0

J DOE 9/30/95 L12384 4.0

 SUBTOTAL HRS.: 20.0

 FEE @116/HR.:$2320.00

 TOTAL HRS.: 22.0

 TOTAL FEES:$2586.00

CONTRACT COSTS

CONTRACTOR NAME MONTH TAC NUMBER CONTRACTOR COST FIN# TASK#

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ORISE 7/95 L12384 $15,100.00 A9076 95-03

ORISE 8/95 L12384 2,000.00 A9076 95-03

ORISE 9/95 L12384 - 998.00 A9076 95-03

 TOTAL: $16,102.00

The HQ TAPM verifies accuracy of the contract

dollar amounts.

Lead Reviewer verifies accuracy of the FIN# and

TASK# to ensure that costs

are associated with the correct case.

 ;

 <

Exhibit 5 (continued)
0312 Exhibit 5 E5-2 Issue Date: 06/06/02

 PART 1 - Summary for Billing Inspections

INSPECTION FEE SUMMARY REPORT

MANHOURS EXPENDED PER COMPLETED INSPECTION

QUARTERLY SUMMARY - OPERATING FACILITIES

PERIOD COVERING: 06/25/95 - 09/30/95

MATERIALS LICENSES

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

LICENSEE NAME: DOCKET #: 0400XXXX FACILITY NAME: ABC COMPANY

INSPECTION REORT NUMBERS: * 95001 * 95002 * * * * *

 * ----- * * * * * *

 ROUTINE EFFORT * * * * * * *

 PREP/DOCUMENT * 2.0 * 3.0 * * * * *

 INSPECTION * 10.0 * 15.0 * * * * *

 ----- ------

 SUBTOTAL ROUTINE 12.0 18.0

 SUB ROUTINE FEE $ 1392.00 $ 2088.00

 REACTIVE EFFORT * * * * * * *

 PREP/DOCUMENT * 0.0 * 0.0 * * * * *

 INSPECTION * 0.0 * 0.0 * * * * *

 ----- ------

 SUBTOTAL REACTIVE 0.0 0.0

 SUB REACTIVE FEE $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 REPORT TOTALS 12.0 18.0

 FEE PER REPORT $ 1392.00 $ 2088.00

 TOTAL ROUTINE FEE $ 3480.00 TOTAL INSPECTION FEE $ 3480.00

 TOTAL REACTIVE FEE $ 0.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES $ 1988.00

 ------- ---------

 TOTAL INSPECTION FEE $ 3480.00 TOTAL FEE $ 5468.00

ALL LEAD INSPECTORS

CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS FOR NMSS PROGRAMS THAT ARE FULL

COST FEE-RECOVERABLE MUST VERIFY THIS

REPORT EACH QUARTER AND FORWARD TO

THE OFFICE OF THE

CONTROLLER FOR BILLING.

This report is generated by

NMSS/PMDA and Regional

DRMA staff from RITS. 

Contact: 

Beverly Jones, NMSS or

your RITS Coordinator

The HQ TAPM verifies accuracy of the contract 

dollar amounts.

 ;

 <

 PART 2 - Detail for Billing Inspections, Staff Hours Only

LIST OF THE QUARTER MANPOWER TRANSACTIONS

FOR INSPECTION TO BE BILLED THIS QUARTER

FOR THE QUARTER: 06/25/95 - 09/30/95

DOCKET #: 0400XXXX - ABC COMPANY - REGION 4

INSP RPT WEEK IMI ACT MODULE REGULAR

RPT NO SENT NAME ENDING CD CD NO HOURS TYPE OF ACTIVITY

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

95001 09/26/95 JBROWN 08/26/95 IFFD APP 2.0 ROUTINE-PREP/DOC

 JBROWN 09/02/95 IFFD CO 86740 10.0 ROUTINE-INSPECTION

 ----

 TOTAL HOURS THIS QUARTER FOR INSPECTION 95001 12.0

95002 09/28/95 BSMITH 09/02/95 IFFD APP 3.0 ROUTINE-PREP/DOC

 BSMITH 09/02/95 IFFD CO 86740 15.0 ROUTINE-INSPECTION

 ----

 TOTAL HOURS THIS QUARTER FOR INSPECTION 95002 18.0

 PART 3 - Detail for Billing Inspections, Contract Cost Only

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM SUPPORT SYSTEM

PENDING & COMPLETED CONTRACT COSTS FOR THE PERIOD: 06/25/95 - 09/30/95

0400XXXX - ABC COMPANY

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 INSP LICENSE PERIOD OF

 NUMBER NUMBER EXPENDITURE EXPENDITURE

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JOB-CODE: A9076 CONTRACT: ORISE

 95001 SNM-XXX 08/95 1100.00

 95002 SNM-XXX 09/95 888.00

JOB-CODE TOTAL 1988.00

FACILITY TOTAL 1988.00

Lead Inspectors verifies

accuracy of the FIN# and

TASK# to ensure that costs

are associated with the correct inspection.

 ;

<

The HQ TAPM verifies accuracy of the contract

dollar amounts.

 ;

 <