alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Reginald Keith GARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John H. THOMAS, Deputy Director; Kulon Willis, Contract Monitor; Ronald Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; Edward C. Morris, Deputy Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; Eddie Lee Pearson, Warden, Sussex II State Prison; David B. Evertt, Assistant Warden of Operations and Support, Sussex II State Prison; E.T. Turner, Unit Manager, Sussex II State Prison; Lieutenant Clintscale, Sussex II State Prison, Defendants-Appellees, and District of Columbia Department of Corrections; Elwood York, Director of External Confinement; Odie Washington, Director, D.C. Department of Corrections, Defendants.

No. 02-6503.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 28, 2002.

Reginald Keith Garrison, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Garrett Hill, Office of the *377Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Reginald Keith Garrison appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Garrison v. Thomas,*No. CA-01-816 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 11, 2002; entered Mar. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### § 7.11 Guantanamo Bay Naval Station.

Articles of foreign origin may enter the area (both land and water) of the Guantanamo Bay Naval Station free of duty, but such articles shall be subject to duty upon their subsequent entry into the United States.

[28 FR 14636, Dec. 31, 1963]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

DONALD GILBERG, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

METLIFE, INC., et al., 

Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs, 

v. 

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., d/b/a U.S. Trust 

Bank of America Private Wealth Management, 

as successor in interest to U.S. Trust Company, 

N.A., 

Third-Party Defendant. 

ORDER 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) Civil Case No. 09-1826 (RJL) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this 

~'1_~f August 2010, hereby 

ORDERED that u.s. Trust's Motion to Dismiss Third-Party Complaint [#20] is 

GRANTED; and it is further 

ORDERED that defendants' Third-Party Complaint be DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE. 

SO ORDERED. 

,
### §§60e, 60e–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–68, title I, §116(b)(1), (2), Nov. 12, 2001, 115 Stat. 573

Section 60e, act May 21, 1937, ch. 236, §2, as added June 2, 1939, ch. 171, 53 Stat. 802; amended Pub. L. 86–426, §2(b), Apr. 20, 1960, 74 Stat. 54; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §204(3), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1729, related to time of payment of salaries of officers and employees of the House of Representatives for months other than the month of December.

Section 60e–1, acts Dec. 28, 1945, ch. 589, title I, 59 Stat. 633; Pub. L. 86–426, §2(c), Apr. 20, 1960, 74 Stat. 54, related to time of payment of salaries in or under the House of Representatives when the usual payday fell on Saturday.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable with respect to pay periods beginning after the expiration of the 1-year period which begins Nov. 12, 2001, see section 116(c) of Pub. L. 107–68, set out as an Effective Date note under section 4551 of this title.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-060 October 5, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO SEND SPECIAL INSPECTION TO MILLSTONE 1 

TO EVALUATE INVESTIGATION INTO MISSING SPENT FUEL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is sending a team to Millstone Unit 1 to evaluate the

comprehensiveness of Northeast Utilitesí investigation into the circumstances surrounding the loss of

two fuel rods. The NRC team will arrive at the Millstone plant, in Waterford, Conn., on Tuesday. 

The four-member team will spend about two-weeks on site and also will evaluate the companyís root

cause analysis. 

Northeast Utilities (NU) had been the operator of the three nuclear units at Millstone Station

until the plants were sold, and the operating license transferred to, Dominion Nuclear last spring. 

On December 15, of last year, Northeast Utilities informed the NRC in writing that it could not

account for two spent fuel rods which had been stored in the Millstone Unit 1spent fuel pool. Records

indicate the rods were last verified to be in the pool in 1980, however there was no documentation of

their presence in the pool beyond that time. 

NU conducted an investigation to determine the whereabouts of the missing rods and provided

it to Dominion. This week, a report was sent to the NRC by Dominion indicating that, although the

exact location of the rods could not be determined, itís likely theyíre at one of four sites, including two

low-level waste disposal sites and two spent fuel pools, one of which is at Millstone 1. Dominion also

made a formal notification to the NRC Operations Center, as required by NRC regulations. 

Since receiving the notification from NU, the NRC has been closely following the companyís

efforts to find the missing rods through onsite inspections and routine conference calls. In addition, the

agency has also maintained a liaison with the appropriate states. 

Neither the companies nor the NRC believe the material was stolen. There are significant

radiological security controls at nuclear power plants such as Millstone that make theft dangerous,

difficult and highly unlikely. The NRC does not believe that a public health and safety problem exists

based on the likely locations of the spent fuel rods. Furthermore, the rods would not pose any risk of

proliferating nuclear weapons due to their low uranium and plutonium content. 
The NRC team will issue an inspection report about 30 days of the completion of the

inspection. 

###
#### § 182.0 Scope.

This part implements the duty preference and related customs provisions applicable to imported and exported goods under the Agreement Between the United States of America, the United Mexican States, and Canada (USMCA), signed on December 10, 2019, and entered into force on July 1, 2020, and under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act (134 Stat. 11) (the Act). For goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, prior to July 1, 2020, please see the NAFTA provisions in part 181 of this chapter. Except as otherwise specified in this part, the procedures and other requirements set forth in this part are in addition to the CBP procedures and requirements of general application contained elsewhere in this chapter.
Opinion issued January 14, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 13 - 00829 - CV

——————————— JOEL LANDRICK ARD , JR . , Appellant

V. AVIGNON HOLDINGS , LLC , Appellee On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No . 1

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1035989

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant , Joel Landrick Ard, Jr. , has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5, 20.1 ; see also T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § § 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 ( West 201 3 ); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Suprem e Court and the Courts2

of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in T EX . R. A PP . P . app. A § B(1)

. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appella nt did not adequately respond. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5 ; 42.3(c). We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any pending motions as moot

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(a)


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") for the
year ended June 30, 2002 of MPW Industrial Services Group, Inc. (the "Issuer").
I, Monte R. Black, Chief Executive Officer of Issuer, certify that:

(i)      the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
         or 78o(d)); and

(ii)     the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Issuer.


Dated:  September 27, 2002


                                               /s/ Monte R. Black
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                                  Monte R. Black
                                        Chairman of the Board of Directors and
                                               Chief Executive Officer
§ 1303.92 Fees to be charged—categories of requesters. There are four categories of FOIA requesters: Commercial use requesters; educational and non-commercial scientific institutions; representatives of the news media; and all other requesters. The specific levels of fees for each of these categories are: ( a ) *Commercial use requesters.* When OMB receives a request for documents for commercial use, it will assess charges that recover the full direct costs of searching for, reviewing for release, and duplicating the record sought. Commercial use requesters are entitled to neither two hours of free search time nor 100 free pages of duplication of documents. OMB may recover the cost of searching for and reviewing records even if there is ultimately no disclosure of records (see § 1303.93(b)).
( b ) *Educational and noncommercial scientific institution requesters.* OMB will provide documents to educational and noncommercial scientific institution requesters that meet the criteria in § 1303.90(f) or (g) for the cost of duplication alone, excluding charges for the first 100 pages. OMB may seek evidence from the requester that the request is in furtherance of scholarly research and will advise requesters of their determination whether the requester has met the criteria in § 1303.90(f) or (g).
( c ) *Requesters who are representatives of the news media.* OMB will provide documents to requesters who are representatives of the news media that meet the criteria in § 1303.90(h) and (i), and that do not make the request for commercial use, for the cost of duplication alone, excluding charges for the first 100 pages.
( d ) *All other requesters.* OMB will charge requesters who do not fit into any of the categories described in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section fees that recover only the full reasonable direct cost of searching for and duplicating records that are responsive to the request, except that the first 100 pages of duplication and the first two hours of search time will be furnished without charge. Moreover, requests for records about the requesters filed in OMB's systems of records will continue to be treated under the fee provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, which permit fees only for producing copies of records
[84 FR 22951, May 21, 2019, as amended at 89 FR 48826, June 10, 2024]
§ 201.40 Records-retention requirements. ( a ) The Secretary shall maintain a copy of the certification by the General Counsel required by § 201.39 for each Commission meeting of which a portion or portions are closed to the public pursuant to a vote under § 201.36(d).
( b ) The Secretary shall also maintain a copy of a statement from the presiding officer of each Commission meeting or portion thereof which was closed to the public for the specific reasons enumerated in paragraphs (b) ( 1 ) through ( 9 ) of § 201.36(b) setting forth ( i ) The time and place of the closed meeting, or portion thereof, and
( ii ) A list of the persons present thereat.
( c ) The Secretary shall also maintain a complete transcript or electronic recording of the proceedings of each Commission meeting or portion of a meeting, whether open to public observation or closed to the public. The Secretary shall also maintain a complete transcript or electronic recording of all deliberations conducted under paragraphs (a) (4), (5), and (6) of § 201.34 of this subpart.
( d ) Where portions of a Commission meeting are closed for the reasons contained in paragraphs (b) (8)(A) or (9) of § 201.36, the Commission preserves the option to maintain detailed minutes of such portions. Such detailed minutes shall fully and clearly describe all matters discussed and shall provide a full and accurate summary of any actions taken, and the reasons therefor, including a description of each of the views expressed on any item and the record of any rollcall vote (reflecting the vote of each member on the question). All documents considered in connection with any action shall be identified in such minutes.
( e ) The retention period for the records required by paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) of this section shall be for a period of at least two (2) years after the particular Commission meeting, or until one (1) year after the conclusion of any Commission proceeding with respect to which the meeting or portion thereof was held, whichever occurs later.
( f ) The requirements of paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section shall not affect or supplant the existing duty of the Secretary to maintain permanent minutes of each Commission meeting. The Secretary shall also maintain permanent minutes of all deliberations conducted under paragraphs (a) (4), (5), and (6) of § 201.34 of this subpart.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-088 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

(Tuesday, June 3, 1997)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A meeting of two subcommittees of the Nuclear Regulatory

Commission's Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, scheduled

for June 10 in Rockville, Maryland, has been postponed due to the

unavailability of documents.

The meeting of the Subcommittees on Materials and Metallurgy

and on Severe Accidents will be rescheduled at a later date. An

announcement will be published in the Federal Register.

#
#### § 1210.4 Waiver of MSPB regulations.

The Board may waive any MSPB regulation in order to provide for the expedited review of an appeal covered by this part. Public Law 113-146, section 707(b)(3).
October 31, 2002

ALL AGREEMENT STATES, MINNESOTA, PENNSYLVANIA, WISCONSIN

NRC TO HOST PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY - NOVEMBER 5, 2002 (STP-02- 076)

On November 5, 2002, the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will host a

public meeting to discuss the Memorandum of Understanding that was signed with the

Environmental Protection Agency. The meeting will be held at NRC Headquarters, Two White

Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland from 12:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. The NRC

has set up a bridge line for those individuals wishing to call into the meeting. The following

number is the Bridge Line: 1-888-566-0007 Passcode: 11920#. Additional information was

provided in All Agreement State letter STP-02-072 dated October 23, 2002.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact the individual named

below:

POINT OF CONTACT: Shawn R. Smith INTERNET: SRS3@NRC.GOV

TELEPHONE: (301) 415-2620 FAX: (301) 415-3502

/RA/

Josephine M. Piccone, Deputy Director

Office of State and Tribal Programs
STP-02-076

Distribution:

DIR RF DCD (SP03)

Agreement State File PDR (YES)

DOCUMENT NAME: C:\ORPCheckout\FileNET\ML023040402.wpd

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy

OFFICE STP STP:DD

NAME SRSmith:gd JMPiccone

DATE 10/31/02 10/31/02
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1577

AN ACT

To designate the visitor center in Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument in Arizona as the ‘‘Kris

Eggle Visitor Center’’, and for other purposes.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1577

AN ACT

To designate the visitor center in Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument in Arizona as the ‘‘Kris Eggle Visitor

Center’’, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1577 EH

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

2 (a) FINDING.—Congress finds that in August 2002,

3 Kris Eggle, a 28-year-old park ranger in Organ Pipe Cac4 tus National Monument, was murdered in the line of duty

5 along the border between the United States and Mexico.

6 (b) DEDICATION.—Congress dedicates the visitor

7 center in Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument to Kris

8 Eggle and to promoting awareness of the risks taken each

9 day by all public land management law enforcement offi10 cers.

11 (c) REDESIGNATION.—The visitor center in Organ

12 Pipe Cactus National Monument in Arizona is hereby des13 ignated as the ‘‘Kris Eggle Visitor Center’’.

14 (d) REFERENCE.—Any reference to the visitor center

15 in Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument in Arizona, in

16 any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other

17 paper of the United States shall be considered to be a ref18 erence to the ‘‘Kris Eggle Visitor Center’’.

19 (e) SIGNAGE.—The Secretary of the Interior shall

20 post interpretive signs at the visitor center and at the

21 trailhead of the Baker Mine-Milton Mine Loop that—

22 (1) describe the important role of public law en23 forcement officers in protecting park visitors;

24 (2) refer to the tragic loss of Kris Eggle in un25 derscoring the importance of these officers;
3

•HR 1577 EH

1 (3) refer to the dedication of the trail and the

2 visitor center by Congress; and

3 (4) include a copy of this Act and an image of

4 Kris Eggle.

5 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

6 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums

7 as may be necessary to carry out this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-44098, 333-75599, 333-46325, 333-84581, 333-99439, 333-107952, 333-125718and 333-88060) of Getty Images, Inc. of our report dated February 28, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

 

Seattle, Washington 

February 28, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Initial Review Group Subcommittee E—Cancer Epidemiology, Prevention & Control.                    

*Date:*                         December 9, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Marriott Bethesda North Hotel, 5701 Marinelli Road, Bethesda, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mary C. Fletcher, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Research Programs Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Rm 8115, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-7413.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 19, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-23979  Filed 10-26-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
### §61f–8. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 61f–8 was editorially reclassified as section 6599 of this title.
#### Franklin D. VIPPERMAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. NEVADA DIVISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Carlos Choncha; et al., Defendants.

No. 01-15920.

D.C. No. CV-00-01355-RLH(RJJ).

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 28, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, WARDLAW, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Franklin D. Vipperman appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights action against the Nevada Department of Parole & Probation (“NDOPP”) and four individual defendants. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

The district court granted NDOPP’s motion to dismiss, but did not dispose of the action as to the individual defendants. “The action cannot be final until the service dispute is resolved by the district court in favor of the [individual] defendants or until the action is dismissed as to those defendants.” *Patchick v. Kensington Pub. Corp.,*743 F.2d 675, 677 (9th Cir.1984).

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.