alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CIV-61549-RAR

POINT CONVERSIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

JUDGE NICHOLAS LOPANE,

in his official capacity as judge in the state of Florida,

Defendant.

________________________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING MOTION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon United States Magistrate Judge Jared M. 

Strauss’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 24] (“Report”), entered on January 8, 2021. 

The Report recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 1] without

prejudice as the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. See Report at 38. Alternatively, the 

Report recommends that if the Court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists, it should dismiss 

the Complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Id. Plaintiff filed objections to the 

Report on January 27, 2021 [ECF No. 27] (“Objections”). 

When a magistrate judge’s “disposition” has been properly objected to, district courts must 

review the disposition de novo. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). Because Plaintiff timely filed 

objections to the Report, the Court has conducted a de novo review of Magistrate Judge Strauss’s

legal and factual findings. Having carefully reviewed the Complaint, Defendant’s Motion to 

Dismiss [ECF No. 8], Plaintiff’s Response [ECF No. 13], Defendant’s Reply [ECF No. 15], the 

Report, the Objections, the factual record, the applicable law, and being otherwise fully advised, 

it is hereby

Case 0:20-cv-61549-RAR Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2021 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report [ECF No. 24] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 8] is GRANTED, and this action is 

DISMISSED without prejudice because the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction 

over Plaintiff’s claims for the reasons set forth in the Report. 

3. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.

4. Any pending motions are DENIED as moot. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, this 31st day of January, 2021.

 _________________________________

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 0:20-cv-61549-RAR Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2021 Page 2 of 2
§ 207.92 Procedures for commencing review of final determinations. ( a ) *Notice of Intent to Commence Judicial Review.* A Notice of Intent to Commence Judicial Review shall contain such information, and be in such form, manner, and style, including service requirements, as prescribed by the Binational Panel Rules.
( b ) *Request for Panel Review.* A Request for Panel Review shall contain such information, and be in such form, manner, and style, including service requirements, as prescribed by the Binational Panel Rules.
[88 FR 14892, Mar. 10, 2023]
#### Ella J. CARDOZA, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Respondent.

No. 01-3273.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 21, 2002.

Before RADER, SCHALL, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Editorial Note on Part 152
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 152 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93022, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 152.1 Definitions. The following are general definitions for the purposes of part 152: ( a ) - ( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Date of exportation.* “Date of exportation,” or the “time of exportation” referred to in section 402, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1401a), means the actual date the merchandise finally leaves the country of exportation for the United States. If no positive evidence is at hand as to the actual date of exportation, the Center director shall ascertain or estimate the date of exportation by all reasonable ways and means in his power, and in so doing may consider dates on bills of lading, invoices, and other information available to him.
( d ) *Fair retail value.* “Fair retail value” or “fair market value” as used in Section XXII, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, and part 148 of this chapter means the price actually paid or payable for all imported merchandise, or if not purchased, the value as otherwise ascertained under 19 CFR 152.100 *et seq.*
[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17477, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 87-89, 52 FR 24446, July 1, 1987; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51269, Dec. 21, 1988]
### §4931. Daniel Webster Senate Page Residence Revolving Fund

#### (a) Establishment

There is established in the Treasury of the United States a revolving fund within the contingent fund of the Senate to be known as the Daniel Webster Senate Page Residence Revolving Fund (hereafter referred to in this section as the "fund"). The fund shall consist of all rental payments and other moneys collected or received by the Sergeant at Arms with regard to the Daniel Webster Senate Page Residence. All moneys in the fund shall be available without fiscal year limitation for disbursement by the Secretary of the Senate in connection with operation and maintenance of the Daniel Webster Senate Page Residence not normally performed by the Architect of the Capitol. In addition, such moneys may be used by the Sergeant at Arms to purchase food and food related items and fund activities for the pages.

#### (b) Deposit of moneys

All moneys received from rental payments and other moneys (including donated moneys) collected or received by the Sergeant at Arms with regard to the Daniel Webster Senate Page Residence shall be deposited in the fund and shall be available for purposes of this section.

#### (c) Vouchers

Disbursements from the fund shall be made upon vouchers approved by the Sergeant at Arms, or the designee of the Sergeant at Arms.

#### (d) Regulations

The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this section and to provide for the operations of the Daniel Webster Senate Page Residence.

(Pub. L. 103–283, title I, §4, July 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 1427; Pub. L. 104–53, title I, §6, Nov. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 518.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 88b–7 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Congressional Operations Appropriations Act, 1995, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1995.

#### Amendments

1995—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–53 inserted "(including donated moneys)" after "other moneys".
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-147 October 2, 2000

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, ON OCTOBER 16 - 17

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has

scheduled a meeting of its subcommittee on fire protection on October 16-17 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, will be held in Room T-2B1 and Room T-2B3

of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at 11545 Rockville Pike, starting at 8:30 a.m. each

day.

During the session, the subcommittee will review the draft performance standard for fire

protection for light water nuclear reactors, the draft regulatory guide on fire protection for operating

nuclear power plants, post-fire safe shutdown circuit analysis, and other fire protection-related issues.

Those who wish to make oral or written statements, or seek additional information on the

meeting or changes to the agenda, should contact Amarjit Singh, at 301-415-6899.

ACRS meeting notices, transcripts and letters are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW/ .

###
#                     2005 Publications                  

Skip to Page Content

*February 8, 2005*

Spector v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd. - Background, Legal Issues, and Implications for Persons with Disabilities

*March 17, 2005*

NCD Recommendations: Workforce Investment Act Reauthorization

*April 15, 2005*

Saving Lives: Including People with Disabilities in Emergency Planning

*May 6, 2005*

Transcending The Barriers And Gaining Entry: A Culturally Competent Realm Of Community Integration For Americans With Disabilities

*May 10, 2005*

Questions and Answers for Mediation Parties: Mediation and the Americans with Disabilities Act

*May 10, 2005*

Questions and Answers for Mediation Providers: Mediation and the Americans with Disabilities Act

*June 9, 2005*

Cover Memorandum Upon the Reissuance of the NCD Statement Opposing Legalization of Assisted Suicide

*June 9, 2005*

Same Struggle, Different Difference: Civil Rights Policy Forum Summary Paper

*June 13, 2005*

The Current State of Transportation for People with Disabilities in the United States

*June 21, 2005*

Hearing on Voter Verification in the Federal Elections Process

*June 26, 2005*

NCD and the Americans with Disabilities Act: 15 Years of Progress

*August 2, 2005*

National Council on Disability Topical Overviews - Information Technology and Americans with Disabilities: An Overview of Innovation, Laws, Progress, and Challenges

*August 2, 2005*

National Council on Disability Topical Overviews - Living Independently and in the Community: Implementation Lessons from the United States

*August 2, 2005*

National Council on Disability Topical Overviews - Living Independently and in the Community: Implementation Lessons from the United States - Quick Reference Guide

*August 2, 2005*

National Council on Disability Topical Overviews - The Right to Participate in Political and Public Life by Persons with Disabilities - Illustrations of Implementation from the United States - Quick Reference

*August 2, 2005*

National Council on Disability Topical Overviews - Lessons for All of Us: Protecting the Right to Education for Persons with Disabilities

*August 2, 2005*

National Council on Disability Topical Overviews - An Overview of the Experience of the United States with Employment and Right to Work Protections

*August 2, 2005*

National Council on Disability Topical Overviews - Access to Transportation by People with Disabilities Illustrations of Implementation from the United States - Quick Reference

*August 2, 2005*

National Council on Disability Topical Overviews - Access to Transportation by People with Disabilities Illustrations of Implementation from the United States

*August 2, 2005*

National Council on Disability Topical Overviews - Access to Information Technology by People with Disabilities Illustrations of Implementation from the United States - Quick Reference

              -  
              - 1 of 2
              - next ›
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-cv-23223-BLOOM/Louis

DRAGAN JANICIJEVIC, on his own 

behalf and on behalf of all other similarly 

situated crewmembers working aboard 

BAHAMAS PARADISE CRUISE 

LINE vessels,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CLASSICA CRUISE OPERATOR, LTD., 

PARADISE CRUISE LINE 

OPERATOR LTD. INC. a/k/a PARADISE 

CRUISE LINE OPERATOR LTD. d/b/a 

BAHAMAS PARADISE CRUISE LINE, 

BPCL MANAGEMENT, LLC d/b/a 

BAHAMAS PARADISE CRUISE LINE, LLC,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Joint Motion for Brief Stay Pending Approval 

of Settlement Agreement and Notice of Class-Wide Settlement, ECF No. [12], filed on August 

21, 2020, that indicates that the parties have reached a settlement of the claims asserted in this 

case.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The above-styled action is administratively CLOSED without prejudice to the parties 

to file a settlement agreement for the Court’s consideration and/or appropriate 

dismissal documentation.

2. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case for administrative purposes only.

3. To the extent not otherwise disposed of, any scheduled hearings are CANCELED, 

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/24/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 20-cv-23223-BLOOM/Louis

2

all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT, and all deadlines are 

TERMINATED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on August 21, 2020.

_________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: 

Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/24/2020 Page 2 of 2
§ 122.132 Sealing of aircraft liquor kits. ( a ) *Sealing required.* Aircraft liquor kits shall be sealed on board the aircraft by crewmembers before the aircraft lands in the U.S. The liquor kits shall be kept under seal while on the ground unless taken to an authorized airline in-bond liquor storeroom.
( b ) *Exception.* When an aircraft is traveling between airports in the U.S., in a trade for which duty-free and tax-free liquor is used during flight, sealing the liquor kits on board during transporting stopovers is not required if: ( 1 ) The liquor kits are kept on board the aircraft; and
( 2 ) The port director finds that sealing is not required for revenue protection.
( c ) *Seals to be used.* Aircraft liquor kits shall be sealed with serially numbered, Customs approved seals. The airline shall use seals supplied by an approved manufacturer, as provided in part 24 of this chapter. A small number of seals may be obtained from the port director.
( d ) *Removing seals.* When sealed liquor kits are on the ground, the Customs seals may be broken only by: ( 1 ) A Customs officer; or
( 2 ) Authorized airline personnel, in an authorized airline in-bond liquor storeroom.
( e ) *Resealing.* When a Customs officer breaks the seal of a liquor kit to check the contents, the action shall be recorded on the liquor kit stores list, and the liquor kit must be resealed with an approved seal.
Case 9:20-cv-81315-WPD Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 1 of 5
Case 9:20-cv-81315-WPD Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 2 of 5
Case 9:20-cv-81315-WPD Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 3 of 5
Case 9:20-cv-81315-WPD Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 4 of 5
Case 9:20-cv-81315-WPD Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 5 of 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             234
<SECURITIES>                                       500
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                       212
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,313
<PP&E>                                           1,861
<DEPRECIATION>                                     384
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,963
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,019
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            94
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,894)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,963
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,944
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (6,827)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   190
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,627
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,098)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,098)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,098)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §1241. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 95–87, title IV, §412, formerly §411, Aug. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 466, renumbered §412, Pub. L. 101–508, title VI, §6010(1), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–296, which required the Secretary of the Interior or the State pursuant to an approved State program to report to Congress annually on operations under the fund together with recommendations for future use of the fund, terminated, effective May 15, 2000, pursuant to section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance. See, also, page 109 of House Document No. 103–7.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-129 November 5, 2002

NRC PROPOSES ALTERNATIVE FIRE PROTECTION RULE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is proposing to amend its fire protection requirements for

nuclear power plants to allow licensees to voluntarily adopt a new set of requirements that incorporate

risk insights.

The proposed rule would permit reactor licensees to use the fire protection requirements

contained in the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 805, “Performance-Based

Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Electric Generating Plants, 2001 Edition” (NFPA

805). 

 Since 1979, the NRC has issued approximately 900 exemptions from its current fire protection

requirements to licensees that submitted a technical evaluation demonstrating the adequacy of an

alternative fire protection approach to satisfy NRC requirements. Under the proposed rule, a licensee

may adopt NFPA 805 as its fire protection program by submitting a license amendment request to the

NRC. After adopting NFPA 805 and completing the required analyses, a licensee may modify its fire

protection program as permitted by NFPA 805. For alternative methods or analytical approaches not

within NFPA 805, a licensee may submit a request for a license amendment. The proposed rule 

maintains safety, provides flexibility to existing fire protection requirements and reduces unnecessary

burden.

 Under the proposed rule, specific hazards as provided in NFPA 805 can be analyzed by the

licensee and changes made without prior NRC review and approval. The proposed rule is part of an

effort by NRC to incorporate risk information into its regulations.

Interested parties have until January 15, 2003 in which to comment. After that date, comments

will be considered if practical to do so, but the Commission can only ensure consideration of comments

received on or before this date. Additional details are available in a Federal Register notice published

November 1.
Comments may be mailed to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,

D.C. 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. They may be delivered to 11555

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on federal workdays. They can

also be submitted via the NRC’s rulemaking web site, at http://ruleforum.llnl.gov .

###
### §2c. Number of Congressional Districts; number of Representatives from each District

In each State entitled in the Ninety-first Congress or in any subsequent Congress thereafter to more than one Representative under an apportionment made pursuant to the provisions of section 2a(a) of this title, there shall be established by law a number of districts equal to the number of Representatives to which such State is so entitled, and Representatives shall be elected only from districts so established, no district to elect more than one Representative (except that a State which is entitled to more than one Representative and which has in all previous elections elected its Representatives at Large may elect its Representatives at Large to the Ninety-first Congress).

(Pub. L. 90–196, Dec. 14, 1967, 81 Stat. 581.)
- 1 -

EXHIBIT 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 20-CV-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 

GROUP, INC. d/b/a/ PAR FUNDING, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________________/

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING RECEIVER, RYAN K. 

STUMPHAUZER’S TWENTY-THIRD MOTION TO LIFT LITIGATION 

INJUNCTION AS TO CERTAIN GARNISHMENT PROCEEDINGS 

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Receiver’s Twenty-Third Motion to Lift 

Litigation Injunction as to Certain Garnishment Proceedings [ECF No. ______] (“Motion”), filed 

on June 10, 2022. 

In the Motion, the Receiver seeks to modify the Court’s Amended Order Appointing 

Receiver dated August 13, 2020 [ECF No. 141], so as to lift the litigation injunction provided for 

in that Order for certain garnishment matters currently pending in the Court of Common Pleas of 

Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania to be opened for the limited purpose to authorize the Receiver, 

in his discretion, to dissolve current writs of garnishment, to mark judgments satisfied, and/or to 

reopen confessed judgments, where the counterparty merchant either has resolved, or has agreed 

to resolve, prior defaults, or otherwise filed for bankruptcy protection, in certain cases in the Court 

of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania. 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1264-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2022 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

The Receiver has made a sufficient and proper showing in support of the relief requested. 

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Receiver’s Motion is GRANTED with respect to the 

relief requested. Specifically, the litigation injunction set forth in the Court’s Amended Order 

Appointing Receiver dated August 13, 2020 [ECF No. 141] is hereby lifted in the following 

matters in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, and solely for the 

purpose as described in the Motion:

a. Fast Advance Funding LLC v. Ecosense Interiors LLC and Guilia 

Finetto, Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Docket No. 

1906068040.

b. Complete Business Solutions Group Inc. d/b/a Par Funding v. 

MHGC Holdings LLC and Gabriel Gaviria, Philadelphia Court of 

Common Pleas Docket No. 200301939.

c. Complete Business Solutions Group Inc. d/b/a Par Funding v. La 

Esquina Del Pan Con Bistec #2 and Gabriel Jamie Gaviria, 

Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Docket No. 200301965.

d. Complete Business Solutions Group Inc. d/b/a Par Funding v.

Modern Living Supplies Inc. d/b/a Modern Living Supplies and 

Mark Naylon, Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Docket No.

190901459.

e. Complete Business Solutions Group Inc. d/b/a Par Funding v.

Dragan Segvic LLC and Dragan Segvic, Philadelphia Court of 

Common Pleas Docket No. 200600328.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this _____ day of ____________, 

2022.

_________________________________

RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: Counsel of record

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1264-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2022 Page 2 of 2