alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 1516

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

An Act

To provide for the establishment by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs of additional

cemeteries in the National Cemetery Administration.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Cemetery Expansion

Act of 2003’’.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW NATIONAL CEMETERIES.

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 4 years after the date

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs,

in accordance with chapter 24 of title 38, United States Code,

shall establish six new national cemeteries. The new cemeteries

shall be located in the following locations (those locations having

been determined by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to be the

most appropriate locations for new national cemeteries):

(1) Southeastern Pennsylvania.

(2) The Birmingham, Alabama, area.

(3) The Jacksonville, Florida, area.

(4) The Bakersfield, California, area.

(5) The Greenville/Columbia, South Carolina, area.

(6) The Sarasota County, Florida, area.

(b) FUNDS.—Amounts appropriated for the Department of Veterans Affairs for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2003 for Advance

Planning shall be available for the purposes of subsection (a).

(c) SITE SELECTION PROCESS.—In determining the specific sites

for the new cemeteries required by subsection (a) within the locations specified in that subsection, the Secretary shall solicit the

advice and views of representatives of State and local veterans

organizations and other individuals as the Secretary considers

appropriate.

(d) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress

a report on the establishment of the national cemeteries required

by subsection (a). The report shall—

(1) set forth a schedule for the establishment of each such

cemetery and an estimate of the costs associated with the

establishment of each such cemetery; and

(2) identify the amount of Advance Planning Funds obligated for purposes of this section as of the submission of the

report.

(e) ANNUAL REPORTS.—The Secretary shall submit to Congress

an annual report on the implementation of this section until the
H. R. 1516—2

establishment of all six cemeteries is completed and each such

cemetery has opened. The Secretary shall include in each such

annual report an update of the information provided under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (d).

(f) DEFINITION OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA.—In this section, the term ‘‘southeastern Pennsylvania’’ means the city of

Philadelphia and Berks County, Bucks County, Chester County,

Delaware County, Philadelphia County, and Montgomery County

in the State of Pennsylvania.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 1205.11 Access to Board records. ( a ) *Submission of request.* Inquiries or requests for access to records must be submitted to the appropriate regional or field office of the Board, or to the Clerk of the Board, U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, 1615 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20419-0001. If the requester has reason to believe that the records are located in a regional or field office, the request must be submitted to that office. Requests submitted to the regional or field office must be addressed to the Regional Director or Chief Administrative Judge at the appropriate regional or field office listed in appendix II of 5 CFR part 1201.
( b ) *Form.* Each submission must contain the following information: ( 1 ) The name, address, and telephone number of the individual to whom the record refers;
( 2 ) The name, address, and telephone number of the individual making the request if the requester is someone other than the person to whom the record refers, such as a legal guardian or an attorney, along with evidence of the relationship. Evidence of the relationship may consist of an authenticated copy of: ( i ) The birth certificate of the minor child, and
( ii ) The court document appointing the individual legal guardian, or
( iii ) An agreement for representation signed by the individual to whom the record refers;
( 3 ) Any additional information that may assist the Board in responding to the request, such as the name of the agency that may have taken an action against an individual, or the docket number of the individual's case;
( 4 ) The date of the inquiry or request;
( 5 ) The inquirer's or requester's signature; and
( 6 ) A conspicuous indication, both on the envelope and the letter, that the inquiry is a “PRIVACY ACT REQUEST”.
( c ) *Identification.* Each submission must follow the identification requirements stated in § 1205.13 of this part.
( d ) *Payment.* Records usually will not be released until fees have been received.
[64 FR 51043, Sept. 21, 1999, as amended at 65 FR 48886, Aug. 10, 2000]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                             THE RESTAURANT COMPANY
                         6075 Poplar Avenue, Suite 800
                            Memphis, Tennessee 38119




                                 April 1, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549-0408

     Re:   Letter to Securities and Exchange Commission
           Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, The
Restaurant Company has obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen
LLP ("Andersen"), its independent public accountants, stating that the December
30, 2001 audit was subject to Andersen's quality control system for its U.S.
accounting and auditing practice in order to provide The Restaurant Company
with reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards and that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen
personnel working on the audit and availability of national office
consultation. Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen is
not relevant to this audit.

Very truly yours,




Steven R. McClellan
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         65,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  128,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (48,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    880,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,596,000
<PP&E>                                         1,094,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 424,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,334,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,284,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    3,060,000
<COMMON>                                       9,325,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (16,940,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,334,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               252,000
<CGS>                                          115,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,064,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (164,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             439,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,416,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,416,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,416,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.48)
        

</TABLE>
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. III-04-002 January 9, 2004

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC STAFF TO DISCUSS AN APPARENT VIOLATION ASSOCIATED WITH

 EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATIONS AT POINT BEACH

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a predecisional enforcement conference on

Tuesday, January 13, in Lisle, Illinois, to discuss an apparent violation associated with making changes

to the emergency plan for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant without receiving prior NRC approval. The

two-reactor facility, located near Two Rivers, Wisconsin, is operated by Nuclear Management

Company.

The meeting will be held at 1 p.m. (CST) in the NRC’s Region III Office, 801 Warrenville

Road, Lisle. Visitors should report first to the Second Floor reception area. The meeting is open to

public observation; before the meeting is adjourned, members of the public may ask questions and

provide comments. 

The meeting will also be available for public viewing by video conference at the NRC

Headquarters, Room O-5B6 One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. 

Persons planning to view the video conference should contact Deidre Spaulding by phone at 301/415-

2928 or by e-mail at DWS@nrc.gov ahead of the meeting to make arrangements.

During a special inspection at Point Beach last year, NRC inspectors discovered that the plant

staff had made changes to the Emergency Action Level procedure that reduced the effectiveness of the

emergency plan without approval from the NRC. 

Emergency Action Levels designate specific events or indicators that would signal to station

personnel how to classify the emergency. Properly identifying the level of emergency is crucial in

providing the appropriate level of response under the station’s emergency plan. The responses will vary

depending on the severity of the threat to plant and public safety.

The purpose of the predecisional enforcement conference is to discuss the apparent violation

and provide the company an opportunity to respond and to provide details of its corrective actions and

other additional information.

The information presented in the predecisional enforcement conference will be considered in

determining the appropriate enforcement action. The enforcement action will not be determined at the

meeting; a decision on the enforcement action, if any, is usually issued several weeks after the 
- 2 -

conference. If issued, the enforcement action will be available online in the NRC’s electronic reading

room at:

http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/regulatory/enforcement/current.html#reactors. The details of the

apparent violation are described in an NRC letter to Nuclear Management Company, which can be

accessed online at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html by entering accession

number ML033371234 as a search term. 

# # #
#### § 190.164 Return to CBP custody.

There is no time limit for the return to CBP custody of distilled spirits, wine, or beer subject to refund of taxes under the provisions of this subpart. The claimant must return the merchandise to CBP custody prior to exportation or destruction and claims are subject to the filing deadline set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1313(r)(1).
### SUBCHAPTER V—OIL SHALE
No. 13,201.

#### Collins *v.*The People.

(21 P. [2d] 1114)

Decided April 24, 1933.

Mr. J. H. Richard, Mr. Guy D. Duncan, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Clarence L. Ireland, Attorney General, Mr. Wallace S. Porth, Assistant, for the people.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Hilliard

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff in error, an attorney, was adjudged guilty of contempt, assessed with a fine and the costs of the cause, and in default of payment was ordered to be confined in the county jail for a period of thirty days.

The contempt proceeding was instituted by the district attorney by an information which charged that plaintiff *455in error had knowingly made false statements in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which petition was prepared and sworn to and filed by plaintiff in error as attorney for one Henry.

A motion to quash the information and a demurrer attacking its sufficiency were overruled. An answer was filed and a trial had, during which evidence in support of and in answer to the charge was introduced.

Extended consideration of numerous assignments of error is rendered unnecessary by the fact the trial court found the plaintiff in error guilty solely and alone because of having incorporated in the petition, which petition was sworn to on information and belief, the allegation “that the petitioner is unlawfully imprisoned, confined and restrained of his liberty in the Colorado General Hospital in the City and County of Denver, State of Colorado.”

The facts, and they are undisputed, are that Henry had been informed against on a felony charge. An attorney appointed by the court entered a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity, whereupon Henry was committed to said hospital for examination in accordance with the provisions of chapter 90, Laws 1927, page 296. Thereafter a friend of Henry who was requested to secure counsel, employed plaintiff in error, and leave was granted him by the court to appear in the cause. Plaintiff in error then sought permission of the hospital authorities to confer with Henry, and on such permission being denied, plaintiff in error instituted the habeas corpus proceeding.

It should be manifest without the citation of authorities that an attorney who inserts in an application for a writ of habeas corpus the usual, customary and time-honored allegation that petitioner is unlawfully restrained of his liberty, which is but the allegation of a legal conclusion, cannot be held guilty of contempt on that ground alone. Nor is the rule altered by the fact that, as here, the hearing upon the return resulted in a *456judgment that the petitioner was lawfully restrained of his liberty. That is always the issue in a habeas corpus proceeding. It would be a dangerous innovation to hold otherwise, but the trial court having so held we find there was error.

The judgment is reversed, and it is ordered that the proceedings be dismissed and the plaintiff in error discharged.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. John Perez, Respondent.

Order of the Court of Special Sessions arresting judgment reversed, upon authority of *People*v. *Post*(163 App. Div. 119), and cause remitted to said court, with directions to render judgment. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Editorial Note on Part 174
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 174 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93025, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 174.3 Power of attorney to file protest. ( a ) *When required.* When a protest is filed by a person acting as agent or attorney in fact for the principal, other than an attorney at law or a customhouse broker or his authorized employee acting in his behalf, there shall have been filed or shall be filed with the protest a power of attorney which either specifically authorizes such agent to make, sign, and file the protest or grants unlimited authority to such agent. No power of attorney to file a protest shall be required in the following cases: ( 1 ) *Attorney at law.* When the protest is filed by an attorney at law as agent or attorney for the principal, the signing of the protest as agent or attorney for the principal by the attorney at law shall be considered a declaration by him that he is currently a member in good standing of the highest court of a State, possession, territory, commonwealth, or the District of Columbia, and has been authorized to sign and file the protest for the principal.
( 2 ) *Customhouse broker or his employee.* When a protest is filed by a customhouse broker, or an authorized employee acting in his behalf, as agent or attorney in fact for the principal, the signing of the protest by the customhouse broker or an authorized employee in his behalf shall be considered a declaration by the broker that he or the employee signing in his behalf, is authorized to sign and file the protest for the principal. The customhouse broker shall have, however, a general power of attorney to transact Customs business for the principal on Customs Form 5291.
( b ) *Execution of power of attorney* — ( 1 ) *Corporation.* A corporate power of attorney to file protests shall be signed by a duly authorized officer or employee of the corporation. If the Center director is otherwise satisfied as to the authority of such corporate officer or employee to grant such power of attorney, compliance with the requirements of § 141.37 of this chapter may be waived with respect to such power.
( 2 ) *Partnership.* A partnership power of attorney to file protests may be signed by one member in the name of the partnership, provided the power recites the name of all the members.
( c ) *Duration.* Powers of attorney issued by a partnership shall be limited to a period not to exceed 2 years from the date of receipt thereof by the Center director. All other powers of attorney may be granted for an unlimited period.
( d ) *Revocation.* Any power of attorney shall be subject to revocation at any time by written notice given to and received by CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically.
(Secs. 514, 515, 46 Stat. 734, as amended; 19 U.S.C. 1514, 1515)
[T.D. 70-181, 35 FR 13429, Aug. 22, 1970, as amended by T.D. 70-224, 35 FR 16243, Oct. 16, 1970; T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17487, July 2, 1973; CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93025, Dec. 20, 2016]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23772]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--International Association of Association 
Management Companies, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 15, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), International Association 
of Association Management Companies, Inc. (``IAAMC'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of 
business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature 
and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: International 
Association of Association Management Companies, Inc., Westmont, IL. 
The nature and scope of IAAMC's standards development activities are: 
Internal quality systems and best practices for association management 
companies.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23772 Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Customs and Border Protection
 AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
 ACTION: General notice.
 SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 1641) and the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 111.51), the following Customs broker license is canceled without prejudice. Name
License No.
Issuing portJ.E. Lowden & Co.
05118
San Francisco.
 Dated: October 8, 2004. Jayson P. Ahern, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations.


[FR Doc. 04-23807 Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
EXHIBIT 12

                  PRIME MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
              FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND 1999
                                   (Unaudited)




<TABLE>
<S>                                                 <C>                 <C>
($ in thousands)                                     Six Months Ended June 30,
                                                      2000                1999
                                                    -------             -------
Income before income taxes and
     after minority interest                        $10,979             $12,440
Undistributed equity income                             (42)                 (4)
Minority interest income of subsidiaries
     with fixed charges                               5,980               1,278
                                                    -------             -------
Adjusted earnings                                    16,917              13,714
                                                    -------             -------
Interest on debt                                      4,933               4,654
Loan fees                                               107                 -
                                                    -------             -------
Total fixed charges                                   5,040               4,654
                                                    -------             -------
Total available earnings before fixed charges       $21,957             $18,368
                                                    =======             =======
Ratio                                                   4.4                 3.9
                                                    =======             =======







</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation (the Company),
hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    WILLIAM
V. CAREYWilliam V. Carey Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer  February
29, 2008