alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCRRES: The combined release and radiation effects satellite program directoryAs a result of natural processes, plasma clouds are often injected into the magnetosphere. These chemical releases can be used to study many aspects of such injections. When a dense plasma is injected into the inner magnetosphere, it is expected to take up the motion of the ambient plasma. However, it has been observed in previous releases at moderate altitudes that the cloud preserved its momentum for some time following the release and that parts of the cloud peeled off from the main cloud presumable due to the action of an instability. As one moves outward into the magnetosphere, the mirror force becomes less dominant and the initial conditions following a release are dominated by the formation of a diamagnetic cavity since the initial plasma pressure from the injected Ba ions is greater than the magnetic field energy density. A previous high-altitude release (31,300 km) showed this to be the case initially, but at later times there was evidence for acceleration of the Ba plasma to velocities corresponding to 60,000 K. This effect is not explained. This series of experiments is therefore designed to inject plasma clouds into the magnetosphere under widely varying conditions of magnetic field strength and ambient plasma density. In this way the coupling of injected clouds to the ambient plasma and magnetic field, the formation of striations due to instabilities, and possible heating and acceleration of the injected Ba plasma can be studied over a wide range of magnetosphere parameters. Adding to the scientific yield will be the availability of measurements for the DOD/SPACERAD instruments which can monitor plasma parameters, electric and magnetic fields, and waves before, during and after the releases.Document ID19930006524Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsLayman, Laura D.*(Alabama Univ. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Miller, George P.*(Alabama Univ. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 20, 1992Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:184504NASA-CR-184504Accession Number93N15713Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-38609Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930006524.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
JEFF L. ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE

DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE

BOB PEMBERTON, JUSTICE

MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE

SCOTT K. FIELD, JUSTICE

CINDY OLSON BOURLAND, JUSTICE

The Honorable Velva L. Price

Civil District Clerk

Travis County Courthouse

P.O.Box 1748

Austin, TX 78767

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Court of Appeals

Third District of Texas

P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547

www.txcourts.gov/3rdcoa.aspx

(512) 463-1733

JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK

Marck-5". 2015

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 03-12-00555-CV

Trial Court Case Number: D-l-GN-11-002194

Style: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

v. Angela Bonser-Lain; Karin Ascott, as next friend on behalf of T. V. H. and A. V.

H., minor children; and Brigid Shea, as next friend on behalf of E. B. U., a minor child

Dear Honorable Velva L. Price:

The Third Court of Appeals has issued the mandate in this cause. Therefore, I am returning

the following original exhibits:

Joint Exhibit 1 (1 volume of administrative record).

Very truly yours,

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk

Filed in The District Court

of Travis County, Texas

MAR 12 2015

At M.

Velva L Price, District Clerk

W <f
Editorial Note on Part 354
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 354 appear at 63 FR 24403, May 4, 1998, and at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

§ 354.11 Prehearing conference. ( a ) ( 1 ) If an administrative hearing has been requested, the presiding official will direct the parties to attend a prehearing conference to consider: ( i ) Simplification of issues;
( ii ) Obtaining stipulations of fact and of documents to avoid unnecessary proof;
( iii ) Settlement of the matter;
( iv ) Discovery; and
( v ) Such other matters as may expedite the disposition of the proceedings.
( 2 ) Any relevant and significant stipulations or admissions will be incorporated into the initial decision.
( b ) If a prehearing conference is impractical, the presiding official will direct the parties to correspond with each other or to confer by telephone or otherwise to achieve the purposes of such a conference.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Getty
Images, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Jonathan D. Klein, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 9, 2006



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    JONATHAN D.
KLEIN                                
|Jonathan D. Klein Co-Founder and Chief Executive
Officer
DAVID B. ROBERTSON 26TH DISTRICT THE SENATE STATE OF MICHIGAN 

## ., l 

### '? It;. COMMITTEES: CHAIR, LOCAL GOVERNMENT 

### tr,: 

## 0 )No ELECTIONS P.O. BOX 30036 LANSING, Ml 48909·7536 PHONE: 15171 373·1636 VICE CHAIR, HEALTH POLICY FINANCE FAX: {517) 373-1453 sendrobertson@sonate.michlgan.gov INSURANCE REFORMS, RESTRUCTURING

AND REINVENTING

I%\.Recycled 'cz:t Paper .June 12, 2012 Mr. DennisDevany Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 Office ofAviation Analysis United States DepartmentofTransportation 400 Seventh St., SW Washington, DC20590 DearMr. Devany: I am writing to express my enthusiastic support for Aerodynamics Incorporated (ADI)request for funding through the Alpena Essential Air Service (EAS) grant. Docketnumber: DOT-OST-2009-0300 The company is based out ofWaterford, Michigan which is located in my State Senate district. I have toured the facilities and met with the'individuals in charge, and 

### 1believethat ADristhe'bestchoice for the EAS grant. ADI was founded in 1959, and has remained a privately held, Michigan headquartered company. The company currently employs over 200 employees. Theyhave anunmatched safetyrating; zero accidents orincidents sincethey began operations in 1959. They continue to be the local community's choice, and would like this opportunity to expand into other areas. The airline has a well thought out business plan that initially would have 12 subsidized flights to Alpena weekly. The first ofthe routes would operate on a 30 seat turbo-prop aircraft to Chicago over Manistee, thus aligning its schedules with those that would compliment Alpena. After this initial part, the ADI would place an additional 19 seat BAE3100 onto the operating certificate ofthe company. This flight would operate 6 times per week nonstop to Detroit, adding a backup aircraft 

### in the region and also permit ADI to manage the aircraft size to the demand for sales. ADI is once again, the best choice forthe EAS grant. The company is Michiganbased, andhas Michigan's citizens' bestinterests in mind. I urge you to approve the above mentioned docket numberfor the Essential Air Service grant. Thankyou foryour consideration. ·

State Senator 26°' District
#### § 12.110 Definitions.

Except as otherwise provided below, the terms used in §§ 12.111 through 12.117 have the meanings set forth for those terms in the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. 136 *et seq.*), hereinafter referred to as “the Act.” The term *Administrator* means the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.

[T.D. 75-194, 40 FR 32321, Aug. 1, 1975, as amended by CBP Dec. 16-15, 81 FR 67143, Sept. 30, 2016]
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert Glaser, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, as amended by this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of RealNetworks, Inc. and





2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: March 2, 2015








/s/ Robert Glaser


Robert Glaser


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
§ 361.104 Aluminum import monitoring. ( a ) Commerce will maintain an import monitoring system on the public AIM system website that will report certain aggregate information on imports of aluminum products obtained from the aluminum licenses and, where available, from publicly available U.S. import statistics. Aggregate data will be reported, as appropriate, on a monthly basis by country of origin, country of smelt, country of last cast, relevant aluminum product grouping, etc., and will include import quantity (metric tons), import Customs value (U.S. $), and average unit value ($/metric ton). The website will also contain certain aggregate data at the 6-digit Harmonized Tariff Schedule level and will also present a range of historical data for comparison purposes. Provision of aggregate data on the website may be revisited should concerns arise over the possible release of proprietary data.
( b ) Reported monthly import data will be refreshed each week, as appropriate, with new data on licenses issued during the previous week. This data will also be adjusted periodically for cancelled or unused aluminum import licenses, as appropriate. Additionally, outdated license data will be replaced, where available, with publicly available U.S. import statistics.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ae Ramirez RODRIGUEZ, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 00-30412.

D.C. No. CR-00-60024-HO.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 24, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P, 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Azael Ramirez Rodriguez appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) *&*841 (b)(1)(A)(viii) and illegal re-entry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Rodriguez’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) stating there are no arguable issues for review and seeking to withdraw as counsel of record. Rodriguez has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

As part of the plea agreement, Rodriguez “waive[d] any right to appeal any matter in connection with this prosecution and sentence.” Having independently re*635viewed the record, we are satisfied that the plea agreement, including the waiver of the right to appeal, was entered knowingly and voluntarily. *United States v. Aguilar-Muniz,*156 F.3d 974, 976 (9th Cir.1998). We therefore enforce the waiver, grant the motion to withdraw, and dismiss the appeal.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
### §1002. Lands subject to geothermal leasing

Subject to the provisions of section 1014 of this title, the Secretary of the Interior may issue leases for the development and utilization of geothermal resources (1) in lands administered by him, including public, withdrawn, and acquired lands, (2) in any national forest or other lands administered by the Department of Agriculture through the Forest Service, including public, withdrawn, and acquired lands, and (3) in lands which have been conveyed by the United States subject to a reservation to the United States of the geothermal resources therein.

(Pub. L. 91–581, §3, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1566; Pub. L. 109–58, title II, §236(1), (6), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 671, 672.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2005—Pub. L. 109–58 inserted section catchline and substituted "geothermal resources" for "geothermal steam and associated geothermal resources" in two places in text.
#### § 207.118 Role of the General Counsel in advising the Commission.

The Assistant General Counsel for Section 337 Investigations shall serve as Acting General Counsel for the purpose of advising the Commission on proceedings brought under this subpart if the prohibited act described in the charging letter involves a protective order issued in connection with a panel review that was pending when the letter was issued, and the General Counsel participated in the panel review. No other Commission attorney shall advise the Commission on proceedings under this subpart concerning a protective order issued during a panel review in which the attorney participated.
U.S. Air Force Fact Sheet

BATTLEFIELD AIR TARGETING MICRO AIR VEHICLE UAS

Mission

The Air Force's Battlefield Air Targeting 

Micro Air Vehicle, or BATMAV, Small 

Unmanned Aircraft System provides realtime direct situational awareness and target 

information for Air Force Special Operations 

Command Battlefield Airmen. The BATMAV 

falls into the class of Air Force small 

unmanned aircraft systems known as micro 

UAS. 

Features

The BATMAV UAS features the expendable 

BATMAV air vehicle, a ground control unit 

and communications ground station. 

BATMAV is a collapsible lightweight air 

vehicle with a two-bladed propeller driven by 

a small electric motor. The BATMAV is 

equipped with an internal Global Positioning 

System and Inertial Navigation System, 

autopilot and two on-board cameras. The entire system can function autonomously from 

takeoff to recovery, or be controlled by one operator using a handheld remote control unit. The 

entire system can fit into a backpack. 

Background

The BATMAV originated from a combat need for combat controller Airmen to carry equipment 

needed for beyond-line-of-sight surveillance and to engage enemy forces. Aerovironment Inc. 

was awarded the contract in December 2006 after competing against a number of candidate 

systems. The Air Force took delivery of its initial BATMAV in 2007. 

General Characteristics

Primary function: Situational awareness and direct target information 

Contractor: Aerovironment, Inc. 

Power plant: Electric motor, rechargeable lithium ion batteries 

Wingspan: 16.5 inches (41.9 cm) 

Length: 11.5 inches (29.2 cm) 

Weight (air vehicle): 1 pound (453 grams) 

Weight: (total system) 14.4 pounds (6.53 kilograms) 

Maximum speed: 40+ mph (35+ knots) 

Operating altitude: Surface to 500+ feet above ground level (0-152+ meters) 

System Cost: approximately $49,000 (2006 dollars) 

Payload: High resolution, day/night camera 

Inventory: Classified

Point of Contact

Air Force Special Operations Command, Public Affairs Office, 229 Cody Ave., Suite 103; 

Hurlburt Field, FL 32544-5312; DSN 579-5515 or 850-884-5515; e-mail: 

afsoc.pa@hurlburt.af.mil

November 2007

BATMAV

Air Force Link - Fact Sheet (Printable) : BATTLEFIELD AIR TARGETING MICRO AI... Page 1 of 1

mhtml:file://C:\Users\tdefosse\AppData\Local\Temp\Air Force Link - Fact Sheet (Printabl... 5/18/2017
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

101 Marietta St., Suite 2900, Atlanta, GA 30323

Tel. 404-331-5503 or 7878

No.: II-97-03 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: Ken Clark 404-331-5503 (Monday, January 6, 1997)

Roger Hannah 404-331-7878

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT ROBINSON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta have announced the

assignment of Binoy Desai as the agency's Senior Resident Inspector at the

Robinson nuclear power plant, located near Hartsville, South Carolina.

Desai joined the NRC in 1986 as a reactor engineer. From 1989 through

1993, he was a resident inspector at the Oconee plant in South Carolina and

from 1993 through 1996, he was a resident inspector at the Turkey Point

plant in south Florida. He received both a Bachelor's and a Master’s

degree in nuclear engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology

(Georgia Tech) in Atlanta.

Desai officially became the Senior Resident Inspector at the Robinson

plant in late December, joining NRC Resident Inspector John Zeiler. The

NRC inspectors at the Robinson plant can be reached at 803-383-4571.

###
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
                                                              EXHIBIT 27
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITS FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    2,139,829
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    121,969
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,094,973
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 412,626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,769,397
<COMMON>                                         1,108
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      659,255
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            782,588
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,403,954
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,159
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,235,089
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             163,240
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    2,606
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 954,349
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                3,769,397
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    2,278,608
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           214,494
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     312,129
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,731,397
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        547,211
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              39,214
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                       0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       132,908
<NET-INCOME>                                   218,751
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,706
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                        0
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        98,725
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       (127,115)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.88


</TABLE>
No: 24-008 January 29, 2024 

CONTACT: Ivonne Couret, 301-415-8200 

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Elects 2024 Leadership, 

Posts Full-Year Meeting Schedule

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has 

elected Walter L. Kirchner as Chair, Gregory H. Halnon as Vice Chair, and David A. Petti as 

Member-at-Large, effective January 2024. 

The ACRS, a group of technical experts, advises the Commission independently from the 

NRC staff on safety issues related to the licensing and operation of nuclear power plants, as well 

as issues of health physics and radiation protection. 

The complete listing of the ACRS members and their biographies can be found on the 

ACRS webpage. 

The committee meeting schedule for 2024 also is available on the NRC website.
Editorial Note on Part 356
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 356 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

§ 356.12 Sanctions for violation of a protective order or disclosure undertaking. ( a ) A person, other than a person exempted from this part by the provisions of section 777f(f)(4) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677f(f)(4)), determined under this part to have violated a protective order or a disclosure undertaking may be subjected to any or all or the following sanctions: ( 1 ) Liable to the United States for a civil penalty not to exceed $100,000 for each violation;
( 2 ) Barred from appearing before the Department to represent another for a designated time period from the date of publication in an official publication of a notice that a violation has been determined to exist;
( 3 ) Denied access to proprietary information for a designated time period from the date of publication in an official publication of a notice that a violation has been determined to exist;
( 4 ) Other appropriate administrative sanctions, including striking from the record of the panel review any information or argument submitted by, or on behalf of, the violating party or the party represented by the violating party; terminating any proceeding then in progress; or revoking any order then in effect; and
( 5 ) Required to destroy and certify to the Department the destruction of all material previously provided by the investigating authority, and all other materials containing the proprietary information, such as briefs, notes, or charts based on any such information received under a protective order or a disclosure undertaking.
( b ) ( 1 ) The firm of which a person determined to have violated a protective order or a disclosure undertaking is a partner, associate, or employee; any partner, associate, employer, or employee of such person; and any person represented by such person may be barred from appearing before the Department for a designated time period from the date of publication in an official publication of notice that a violation has been determined to exist or may be subjected to the sanctions set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, as appropriate.
( 2 ) Each person against whom sanctions are proposed under paragraph (b)(1) of this section is entitled to all the administrative rights set forth in this subpart separately and apart from rights provided to a person subject to sanctions under paragraph (a) of this section, including the right to a charging letter, right to representation, and right to a hearing, but subject to joinder or consolidation by the administrative law judge under § 356.23(b).
[59 FR 229, Jan. 3, 1994, as amended at 86 FR 70052, Dec. 9, 2021]