SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 

Staff Report 

SCAQMD 8-Hour Ozone 

Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) Demonstration 

June 2006 

Deputy Executive Officer 

Planning, Rule Development, and Area Sources 

Elaine Chang, DrPH 

Assistant Deputy Executive Officer 

Planning, Rule Development, and Area Sources 

Laki Tisopulos, Ph.D., P.E. 

Planning Manager 

Planning, Rule Development, and Area Sources 

Joe Cassmassi 

Author 

Minh Pham, P.E. – Air Quality Specialist 

Reviewed By 

Ed Eckerle – Program Supervisor 

Barbara Baird – Principal Deputy District Counsel 

SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 

GOVERNING BOARD 
Chairman: WILLIAM A. BURKE, Ed.D. 

Speaker of the Assembly Appointee 

Vice Chairman: S. ROY WILSON, Ed.D. 

Supervisor, Fourth District 

Riverside County Representative 

MEMBERS:

MICHAEL D. ANTONOVICH 

Supervisor, Fifth District 

Los Angeles County Representative 

JANE W. CARNEY 

Senate Rules Committee Appointee 

BEATRICE J. S. LAPISTO-KIRTLEY 

Mayor, City of Bradbury 

Cities Representative, Los Angeles County/Eastern Region 

RONALD O. LOVERIDGE 

Mayor, City of Riverside 

Cities Representative, Riverside County 

GARY OVITT 

Supervisor, Fourth District 

San Bernardino County Representative 

JAN PERRY 

Councilmember, City of Los Angeles 

Cities Representative, Los Angeles County, Western Region 

MIGUEL PULIDO 

Mayor, City of Santa Ana 

Cities Representative, Orange County 

WILLIAM S. CRAYCRAFT 

Council Member, City of Mission Viejo 

Cities Representative, Orange County 

JAMES W. SILVA 

Supervisor, Second District 

Orange County Representative 

CYNTHIA VERDUGO-PERALTA 

Governor’s Appointee 

DENNIS YATES 

Mayor, City of Chino 

Cities Representative, San Bernadino County 

EXECUTIVE OFFICER:

BARRY R. WALLERSTEIN, D.Env. 
Table of Contents 

INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................1

EPA REGION IX GUIDANCE ...................................................................................................................3

DISTRICT APPROACH AND EVALUATION ........................................................................................4

OVERVIEW OF SCAQMD PROGRAM ...........................................................................................................4

DISTRICT’S APPROACH AND EVALUATION ..................................................................................................5

CONCLUSIONS ...........................................................................................................................................9

APPENDIX 1 - SIP-APPROVED RULES, FEDERAL CTGS-ACTS & BEYOND RACT RULES ..10

TABLE 1-1: LIST OF SCAQMD SIP-RULES, CTGS-ACTS, AND BEYOND RACT RULES .........................12

TABLE 1-2: LIST OF FEDERAL CTGS AND DISTRICT RULES ......................................................................22

TABLE 1-3: LIST OF FEDERAL ACTS AND DISTRICT RULES ......................................................................25

APPENDIX 2 - RACT ANALYSIS FOR GROUP I RULES..................................................................29

RULE 1106 - MARINE COATING OPERATIONS (AMENDED 1/13/95)...........................................................31

RULE 1117 - EMISSIONS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN FROM GLASS MELTING FURNACES (AMENDED 1/6/84)

..................................................................................................................................................................32

RULE 1136 – WOOD PRODUCTS COATING (AMENDED 6/14/96) ................................................................33

RULE 1153 - COMMERCIAL BAKERY OVENS (AMENDED 1/13/95).............................................................34

RULE 1159 – NITRIC ACID UNITS – OXIDES OF NITROGEN (ADOPTED 12/6/85) ........................................35

RULE 1173 - FUGITIVE EMISSIONS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (AMENDED 12/6/02).................36

RULE 1176 - SUMPS AND WASTEWATER SEPARATORS (AMENDED 9/13/96) .............................................38

APPENDIX 3 - RACT ANALYSIS FOR GROUP II RULES ................................................................39

RULE 461 – GASOLINE TRANSFER AND DISPENSING (AMENDED 6/3/05)...................................................41

RULE 463 – ORGANIC LIQUID STORAGE (AMENDED 5/6/05) .....................................................................41

RULE 1107 – COATING OF METAL PARTS AND PRODUCTS (AMENDED 1/6/06)..........................................41

RULE 1113 – ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS (AMENDED 7/9/04)..................................................................42

RULE 1121 – CONTROL OF NITROGEN OXIDES FROM RESIDENTIAL TYPE, NATURAL GAS-FIRED WATER 

HEATERS (AMENDED 9/3/04).....................................................................................................................42

RULE 1145 – PLASTIC, RUBBER, LEATHER AND GLASS COATINGS (AMENDED 12/3/04)...........................43

RULE 1146.2 – EMISSIONS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN FROM LARGE WATER HEATERS AND SMALL BOILERS 

(AMENDED 1/7/05) ....................................................................................................................................43

RULE 1151 – MOTOR VEHICLE AND MOBILE EQUIPMENT NON-ASSEMBLY LINE COATING OPERATIONS 

(AMENDED 12/2/05) ..................................................................................................................................43

RULE 1162 – POLYESTER RESIN OPERATIONS (AMENDED 7/8/05) ............................................................44

RULE 1166 – VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND EMISSIONS FROM DECONTAMINATION OF SOIL (AMENDED 

5/11/01).....................................................................................................................................................45

RULE 1168 – ADHESIVE AND SEALANT APPLICATIONS (AMENDED 1/7/05)...............................................45

RULE 1171 – SOLVENT CLEANING OPERATIONS (AMENDED 5/6/05).........................................................46

APPENDIX 4 - RACT ANALYSIS FOR GROUP III RULES...............................................................47

RULE 462 – ORGANIC LIQUID LOADING (AMENDED 5/14/99) ...................................................................50

RULE 1109 – EMISSIONS OF OXIDES OF NITROGEN FROM BOILERS AND PROCESS HEATERS IN PETROLEUM 

REFINERIES (AMENDED 8/5/88).................................................................................................................53

RULE 1110.2 – EMISSIONS FROM GASEOUS AND LIQUID-FUELED ENGINES (AMENDED 6/3/05)................54

RULE 1118 – CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM REFINERY FLARES (AMENDED 11/4/05) ..............................57

RULE 1133.2 – EMISSION REDUCTIONS FROM CO-COMPOSTING OPERATIONS (ADOPTED 1/10/03) ..........58

RULE 1163 – CONTROL OF VINYL CHLORIDE EMISSIONS (AMENDED 6/7/85) ...........................................59

APPENDIX 5 - MAJOR SOURCE FACILITIES ...................................................................................60

TABLE 5-1: LIST OF TITLE V FACILITIES....................................................................................................61

TABLE 5-2: EXAMPLE OF INFORMATION AVAILABLE FOR TITLE V FACILITY...........................................79
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

______________________________________________________________________________________ 

Introduction 1 June 2006 

Introduction 

On April 30, 2004 (69 FR 23951), the U.S. EPA published a final rule that addressed the 

classifications for the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS), the 

revocation of the 1-hour ozone NAAQS, the attainment dates, and the timing of emissions 

reductions. With regards to the 8-hour ozone NAAQS, the South Coast AQMD is 

classified as “Subpart 2/Severe 17” category and the Coachella Valley located in 

Riverside County is classified as “Subpart 2/Serious category.”1 As Subpart 2 category, in 

addition to revising the SIP to include additional control measures to address the 8-hour 

ozone, and conducting attainment demonstrations through regional modeling, CARB (or 

essentially SCAQMD) is required to submit a RACT SIP Submittal to EPA to 

demonstrate that their current rules fulfill the 8-hour ozone RACT for all CTG source 

categories. CARB must assure that RACT is met, either through 1) a certification that 

previously required RACT controls for 1-hour ozone also represent RACT for 8-hour 

ozone, or 2) a new RACT determination. The RACT SIP Submittal must be submitted by 

CARB to EPA by September 15, 20062

, and as such SCAQMD staff must submit the 

analysis to CARB for review by July 15, 2006. 

Previously the South Coast Air Basin (Basin) was classified as an “extreme” nonattainment area for 1-hour ozone. The Clean Air Act (CAA), Section 172 (c)(1)3

 and the 

California Health and Safety Code (H&SC) Section 40460(a) and 40913, require the 

SCAQMD to adopt an Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) containing reasonably 

available control measures (RACM) and reasonably available control technology (RACT) 

to bring the Basin into attainment as expeditiously as practicable. In addition, the H&SC 

Section 40440(a) requires the AQMD to adopt rules and regulations to implement the 

AQMP. The plan, rules, and regulations are the principal components of the Basin’s State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) which must be reviewed by the California Air Resources 

Board (CARB) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Once approved by 

CARB and EPA, SIP becomes a legally binding document for the SCAQMD to lead the 

Basin into attainment with the NAAQS. 

Section 182 of the CAA specifies the requirements for the AQMP and schedules of 

submittal and revision. Non-attainment areas classified as marginal and moderate are 

required to implement RACT for all major sources of VOC4

. RACT is defined by the 

 

1

40 CFR 81.305, effective on June 15, 2004 

2

Federal Register, Volume 70, Citation 71612, November 29, 2005

3

Excerpt of Section 172(c)(1), 

“Such plan provisions shall provide for the implementation of all reasonably available control 

measures as expediously as practicable (including such reductions in emissions from existing sources in 

the area as may be obtained through the adoption, at a minimum, of reasonable available control 

technology) and shall provide for attainment of the national primary ambient air quality standards.” 

4

Excerpt of Section 182(b)(2), 

“REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY – The State shall submit a revision to the 

applicable implementation plan to include provisions to require the implementation of reasonably 

available control technology under section 172(c)(1) with respect to each of the following: 

(A) Each category of VOC sources in the area covered by a CTG document issued by the 

Administrator between the date of the enactment of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 and 

the date of attainment. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

______________________________________________________________________________________ 

Introduction 2 June 2006 

EPA as the lowest emission limit that a particular source is capable of meeting through the 

application of control technology that is reasonably achievable considering technological 

and economic feasibility.5

 Non-attainment areas classified as serious, severe, or extreme 

have additional requirements above and beyond VOC RACT. Section 182(e)(5)6 and 

Section 182(f)7 call for the implementation of above RACT for both VOC and NOx 

sources, since both VOC and NOx are precursors of ozone. 

To establish a “presumptive” RACT level across the nation, Section 183 of the CAA 

requires the EPA to develop several Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) for VOC 

sources, and Alternative Control Techniques (ACT) documents for VOC and NOx 

sources. Most of the CTG documents were issued prior to 1990, and most of the ACT 

documents were issued in the mid-1990s. The CTG documents contain mandated 

emission standards and work practices whereas the ATC documents contain recommended 

measures, but not mandated. The EPA is also required to revise and update these 

documents as new or updated information becomes available. 

To facilitate the development of the RACT SIP Submittal for the 8-hour ozone, the EPA 

Region IX issued a guidance letter8

 which specifies the areas of information that EPA is 

looking for in a minimally acceptable RACT SIP Submittal. In addition, the EPA Region 

IX published a list of CTG/ATCs9 and provided SCAQMD staff with all electronic 

CTG/ATC documents, and a suggested language for “Negative Declarations”10. The fivestep guidance of EPA Region IX, and the approach of SCAQMD staff are presented 

below. 

 

(B) All VOC sources in the area covered by any CTG issued before the date of the enactment of 

the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. 

(C) All other major stationary sources of VOCs located in the area.” 

5

44 FR 53762, September 17, 1979 

6

Excerpt of Section 182(e)(5), 

“NEW TECHNOLOGIES – The Administrator may, in accordance with section 110, approve provisions 

of an implementation plan for an Extreme Area which anticipate development of new control techniques 

or improvement of existing control technologies, and an attainment demonstration based on such 

provisions,...”

7

Excerpt of Section 182(f), 

“NOx REQUIREMENTS – (1) The plan provisions required under this subpart for major stationary 

sources of volatile organic compounds shall also apply to major stationary sources .... of oxides of 

nitrogen”

8

Letter from Andrew Steckel to Kurt Karperos, titled “RACT SIPs”, March 9, 2006. 

9

Letter from Andrew Steckel to Kurt Karperos, titled “RACT SIPs”, April 4, 2006, with a list of CTGs and 

ACTs provided by Stanley Tong 

10 Letter from Andrew Steckel to Kurt Karperos, titled “Sample Language for Negative Declaration for use 

with 8-hour Ozone Reasonably Available Control Technology – State Implementation Plan (RACT SIP) 

Certification”, May 25, 2006 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

______________________________________________________________________________________ 

EPA Region IX Guidance 3 June 2006 

EPA Region IX Guidance 

The five-step guidance of EPA Region IX is presented below. 

1. Describe efforts to identify all source categories within the District requiring RACT, 

including CTG sources (i.e., covered by an EPA Control Technique Guideline 

document) and major non-CTG sources. 

2. Submit negative declarations where there are no facilities (major or minor) within the 

District subject to a CTG. 

3. For all categories needing RACT, list the state/local regulation that implements 

RACT. It may also be helpful to list the date EPA approved these regulations as 

fulfilling RACT. 

4. Describe the basis for concluding that the regulations fulfill RACT. Documents useful 

in establishing RACT include CTGs, Alternative Control Technique guidance (ACT), 

Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards, New Source 

Performance Standards (NSPS), California Suggested Control Measures (SCM) and 

RACT/Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BARCT) determinations, 

regulations adopted in other Districts, and guidance and rules developed by other 

state and local agencies. 

5. We understand that some Districts may use CAPCOA’s September 2003 Potential 

All Feasible Measures (AFM) Report to help demonstrate RACT. If so, the RACT 

SIP should certify that local regulations are equivalent to AFM, justify the assumption 

that the AFM fulfilled RACT in 2003, and include some sort of 

certification/demonstration that no additional controls have become more reasonably 

available since then. 

The list of CTG/ATCs provided by EPA Region IX is in Table 1-2 and 1-3 of Appendix 1 

of this Staff Report. There are 26 CTG and 28 ACT source categories. The major 

sources that are not covered by the CTG are called major non-CTG sources. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

District’s Approach and Evaluation 4 June 2006 

District Approach and Evaluation 

Overview of SCAQMD Program 

The EPA approved the 1997 South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for ozone, as 

revised by a 1999 amendment, on April 10, 200011. The EPA is in the process of reviewing the 

2003 AQMP. To implement the reasonably available control measures in the AQMP, the 

SCAQMD staff develops and implements the South Coast AQMD Rules and Regulations, which 

include Regulation I through Regulation XXXI. Specifically, the rules and regulations that 

regulate stationary sources are: 

 

 Regulation IV – Prohibitions, and Regulation XI – Source Specific Rules, contain rules with 

emission standards and work practices developed to implement the AQMP control measures; 

 Regulation IX - Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources (NSPS), and 

Regulation X - National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) 

contain all federal rules which were developed by EPA. These rules meet RACT and were 

adopted by references, without changes, by SCAQMD; 

 Regulation XX - RECLAIM, contains requirements such as periodic monitoring or 

recordkeeping to enhance the source’s compliance with Regulation IV and XI; and 

 Regulation XXX – Title V Permits to implement the Federal Operating Permit Program. 

Since Regulation IX and X are at the level of RACT or better, Regulation XX is considered by 

EPA as meeting RACT12, and Regulation XXX are essentially Federal Operating Permit 

Program, SCAQMD staff focused on reviewing the NOx and VOC rules in Regulation IV and XI 

for this RACT SIP Submittal. 

 

Every single AQMP, rule and regulation is carefully reviewed and scrutinized through a threetier review process by SCAQMD, CARB, EPA staff, as well as the public. Tier 1 review is 

conducted by SCAQMD staff. By law, SCAQMD staff must develop regulations and rules to 

meet, at a minimum, the RACT or RACM requirements. SCAQMD staff must review all related 

CTGs and ACTs published at the time they develop a source-specific rule. As part of the rule 

development process, SCAQMD staff is required to analyze all CARB and EPA publications and 

studies including the CTGs and the Air Toxics Control Measures (ATCMs) to assess the 

feasibility and costs of the control techniques.13 Furthermore, under the requirement of H&S 

Code Section 40727.2, SCAQMD staff is required to perform a Comparative Analysis comparing 

the requirements of the proposed rule with the requirements of other local, state and federal 

regulations, including but not limited to, the emission standards, and the use of Best Available 

 

11

 Citation 65 FR 18903 

12 In developing the most recent versions of Regulation XX, staff has determined that Regulation XX meets

BARCT, which is above and beyond RACT. EPA is proposing to approve Regulation XX into SIP. Citation 71 FR 

28290. 

13 SCAQMD Rule Development Manual
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

District’s Approach and Evaluation 5 June 2006 

Control Technologies for new or modified equipment (BACT or BARCT), that apply to the same 

equipment or source type. 

After regulations and rules are adopted by the Governing Board, they are submitted to CARB 

and EPA for review and inclusion into SIP. CARB and EPA must evaluate these documents to 

ensure that they meet the requirements in the federal and California CAA. CARB and EPA have 

developed, published, and updated many CTGs and ACTs and are knowledgeable of the 

minimum RACT requirements.14 Their staff is required to assess RACT/BARCT prior to 

approval any SCAQMD submittals into SIP. 15 In addition, each of these three tier reviews must 

go through intensive public notification and participation. 

With the independent review in this three-tier process by SCAQMD, CARB and EPA, and the 

public participation, any document that is adopted by SCAQMD and is subsequently approved 

by CARB and EPA, should be considered as meeting the minimum “presumptive” RACT. 

District’s Approach and Evaluation 

In order to determine that the SCAQMD rules satisfy RACT, the SCAQMD staff conducted an 

evaluation following the EPA Region IX guidance. Each guidance element is presented below, 

followed by the specific SCAQMD approach. 

EPA Guidance: Describe efforts to identify all source categories within the District 

requiring RACT, including CTG sources (i.e., covered by an EPA Control Technique 

Guideline document) and major non-CTG sources. 

SCAQMD Evaluation: All CTGs sources are identified in Table 1-1 (i.e. the categories with a 

checkmark in the column titled “On EPA Region 9’s CTG-ACT list”) and Table 1-2. Each CTG 

source is subject to one or more SCAQMD rules in Regulation IV, IX, X, and XI. Non-CTG 

sources are the sources without a checkmark in this column. For each non-CTG source, there is 

a corresponding SCAQMD rule as shown in Table 1-1. 

A search was conducted of the SCAQMD permitting database and a total of approximately 1,311 

major source facilities having VOC or NOx emissions equal to or more than 10 tons per year 

were identified. These facilities have a total of 17,607 permits. Approximately 750 of these 

major source facilities are Title V facilities which have federal enforceable permits with clearly 

identified SIP-approved rules. The list of 750 Title V facilities is included in Table 5-1 of 

 

14 To aid the air districts in developing regulations to meet RACT, CARB has developed a series of RACT/BARCT 

determinations in the mid 1990s: 1) Determination of RACT for Metal Parts and Products Coating Operations, 

ARB/SSD-93-003; 2) Determination of RACT for the Control of Fugitive Emissions of VOC from Oil and Gas

Production Facilities, ARB/SSD-93-002; 3) Determination of RACT and BARCT for Industrial, Institutional, and 

Commercial Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters, 7/18/91; 4) Determination of RACT and BARCT for 

Polyester Resin Operations, 1/8/91; 5) Determination of RACT and BARCT for Marine Vessel Loading Operations, 

1/8/91; 6) Determination of RACT and BARCT for Marine Coating Operations, 1/8/91; 7) Determination of RACT 

and BARCT for Organic Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing Operations, 7/18/91. 

15 EPA Blue Book, Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations, 5/25/88.
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

District’s Approach and Evaluation 6 June 2006 

Appendix 5. Table 5-2 of Appendix 5 provides an example on how each permitted source in a 

Title V facility was associated with an applicable district rule. These rules were then compared 

with the list of CTGs, ACTs and district rules in Tables 1-1, 1-2 and 1-3. In the example shown 

in Table 5-2, this Title V facility had CTG sources corresponding to Rules 404, 405, 407, 1107 

(CTG category of Metal Parts and Products), 1145 (ACT category of Plastic Parts), and Rule 

1171 (ACT source). 

EPA Guidance: Submit negative declarations where there are no facilities (major or 

minor) within the District subject to a CTG. 

SCAQMD Evaluation: By comparing the list of CTGs (and ACTs) and applicable source 

specific rules, and by examining the list of SIC codes for existing facilities in the district 

permitting database, SCAQMD staff determined that there was at least one facility in the Basin 

subject to either a CTG (or ACT). One ACT: Agricultural Pesticide Application does occur in 

the Basin, but is regulated by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation and does not 

come under the control of the SCAQMD. At this time, SCAQMD staff does not plan to submit 

any negative declarations. 

EPA Guidance: For all categories needing RACT, list the state/local regulation that 

implements RACT. It may also be helpful to list the date EPA approved these regulations 

as fulfilling RACT. 

SCAQMD Evaluation: Table 1-2 of Appendix 1 contains a list of CTGs developed by EPA. 

Table 1-3 contains a list of ACTs. For each CTG or ACT, there is a corresponding SCAQMD 

rule. The date of EPA approval for each rule as fulfilling RACT is listed in Table 1-1. 

In addition to the information shown in Tables 1-1 through 1-3, SCAQMD staff added three 

more steps described below to ensure that all categories met RACT16

: 

1) Where a CTG/ACT became available after the EPA rule approval date, SCAQMD staff 

evaluated the rule and determined if the level of control provided in the new CTG/ACT was 

more stringent than the adopted rule. For example, SCAQMD staff evaluated Rule 1106 

which was approved by EPA on July 1995, and compared its requirements to the applicable 

CTG which became available on August 1996. There are a total of 7 rules in this category. 

This category of rules is called Group I rules, and the evaluation for these rules is presented 

in Appendix 2 of the Staff Report. 

2) Where the regulation approved by EPA is amended after the approval date, SCAQMD staff 

evaluated the amendments to ensure that the amendment does not result in a relaxation of 

control. If necessary, SCAQMD staff presented analysis to justify that any relaxation, if 

made, did not interfere with the attainment date. There were a total of 12 rules in this 

 

16 Letter from Joseph Cassmassi to Andrew Steckel, titled “8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP”, April 5, 2006.
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

District’s Approach and Evaluation 7 June 2006 

category and the evaluation for these rules is presented in Appendix 3 of the Staff Report. 

This category of rules is called Group II rules. 

3) SCAQMD staff evaluated the regulations that have not yet been approved by EPA to justify 

that the regulations fulfilled RACT. There are a total of 2 rules in this category and the 

evaluation for these rules is presented in Appendix 4 of the Staff Report. This category of 

rules is called Group III rules. 

In addition to the analyses provided in Appendices 2 through 4 for Group I, II and III rules, 

under the requirement of Senate Bill 656 (SB 656, Sher), the SCAQMD staff also provided an 

analysis for all of the control measures indicated as readily available, feasible, and cost-effective 

by CARB for particulate matter in June 2005. 

EPA Guidance: Describe the basis for concluding that the regulations fulfill RACT. 

Documents useful in establishing RACT include CTGs, Alternative Control Technique 

guidance (ACT), Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards, New 

Source Performance Standards (NSPS), California Suggested Control Measures (SCM) 

and RACT/Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BARCT) determinations, 

regulations adopted in other Districts, and guidance and rules developed by other state 

and local agencies. 

SCAQMD Evaluation: For each rule in Group I and Group III, SCAQMD staff compared the 

emission limits or standards, monitoring, testing, recordkeeping, and work practice requirements 

in the rules with those in the CTG/ACTs. If it was necessary, SCAQMD staff used information 

in BARCT or rules developed by other local agencies for comparison. The evaluation for Group 

I and III rules are presented in Appendices 2 and 4, respectively. Group II rules did not require 

an evaluation under this guidance element since it was sufficient to determine that no relaxation 

occurred. 

It should be highlighted that all federal NSPS and NESHAP standards are adopted by references 

without changes to District Regulations IX and X. The assurance that all CTG sources in the 

District meet RACT is augmented even more because they are subject to the “presumptive” 

RACT in NSPS and NESHAP, and are locally enforced by the District. 

In order to approve a rule and regulation into the SIP, CARB and EPA have to consider if the 

rule and regulation meets, at a minimum, the “presumptive” RACT level. Because of that, any 

rules and regulations approved by CARB and EPA to implement the 1-hour ozone SIP should be 

considered as meeting RACT at the time of approval. Therefore, any categories for which EPA 

has not published any additional CTG/ATC after the approval date, and for which no more 

stringent rule has since been adopted, should be considered as meeting RACT for the 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS. In addition, the District routinely reviews its rules at least every three years for 

air quality management update, most recently in 2003, and proposes rule amendments whenever 

any information comes to its attention that indicates that a rule can be made more stringent. The 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

District’s Approach and Evaluation 8 June 2006 

fact that these two review processes have not revealed any potential for making these rules more 

stringent indicates that the existing rules satisfy current RACT for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS 

EPA Guidance: We understand that some Districts may use CAPCOA’s September 

2003 Potential All Feasible Measures (AFM) Report to help demonstrate RACT. 

If so, the RACT SIP should certify that local regulations are equivalent to AFM, justify the 

assumption that the AFM fulfilled RACT in 2003, and include some sort of 

certification/demonstration that no additional controls have become more reasonably 

available since then. 

SCAQMD Evaluation: SCAQMD staff analyses relied on a direct comparison with the 

CTG/ACTs. In addition to comparing directly to CTG/ACTs, for rules such as Rule 1173 

(Group I rule in Appendix 2) and Rule 462 (Group III rule in Appendix 4), SCAQMD staff made 

additional comparisons to the information provided in the 2003 CAPCOA AFM. 

Even though SCAQMD staff did not solely use the information in the 2003 CAPCOA AFM, it is 

worthwhile to justify that the information provided in the 2003 CAPCOA AFM is valid and 

reflects the RACT level of control. To justify the information in the 2003 CAPCOA 

AFM, SCAQMD staff compared the conclusions in this report to the conclusions made 

by the following two reports: 

 The EPA document titled “Beyond VOC RACT CTG Requirements, EPA-453/R-95-010, 

published in April 1995, and 

 The Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO) document titled “Midwest RPO 

Candidate Control Measures”, published in April 2005. Section 4 of this report, 

“Analysis of Reasonably Available Control Technology” discusses beyond RACT 

requirements in California. 

A checkmark is provided in Table 1-1, Appendix 1, for each District rule that was analyzed in 

the EPA report published in 1995, the CAPCOA report published in 2003, and the LADCO 

report published in 2005. Each rule that has a checkmark represents the rule with the most 

stringent, above and beyond RACT requirements, described in each of these three reports. The 

parallel checkmarks on Table 1-1 demonstrate that the conclusions in the 2003 CAPCOA report 

are commensurable with those made by EPA and LADCO. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Conclusions 9 June 2006 

Conclusions 

Summary of SCAQMD staff’s findings: 

1. All SCAQMD rules approved by CARB and EPA to implement the 1-hour ozone SIP fulfill 

RACT for the 8-hour ozone. 

2. All CTG sources in the Basin are subject to SIP-approved rules in Regulation IV, IX, X, XI, 

XIII, and/or XX and therefore meet RACT requirements. 

3. All major non-CTG sources in the Basin are subject to SIP-approved rules in Regulation IV 

and/or Regulation XI, XIII, and/or XX and therefore meet RACT requirements. 

4. There are currently no Regulation XI source-specific rules for agricultural pesticide 

applications (ACT category). However, agricultural pesticide application is regulated by the 

State Department of Pesticide Regulation and is not subject to SCAQMD control.. 

5. There are approximately 1,311 major facilities ( 10 tons per year of VOC or NOx) in the 

Basin with approximately 17,607 permits. Approximately 750 of these major source 

facilities are Title V facilities which have federal enforceable permits with clearly identified 

SIP-approved rules. 

 

 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Appendix 1 10 June 2006 

Appendix 1 - SIP-Approved Rules, Federal CTGs-ACTs & 

Beyond RACT Rules 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Appendix 1 11 June 2006 

List of SCAQMD SIP-Approved Rules in Table 1-1

Table 1-1 provides the information on SIP-approved rules of the SCAQMD. The first four 

columns of Table 1-1 provide the following information 

1. Rule number of each rule in Regulation IV and XI 

2. Title of each rule 

3. List of pollutants regulated for each rule. (The focus of this report is for VOC and NOx 

rules only since VOC and NOx are precursors of PM) 

4. Date of the last amendments for each rule 

After the Governing Board adopts an SCAQMD rule, SCAQMD staff sends the rule to CARB 

and U.S. EPA for review. Table 1-1 provides the status of review from EPA. 

1. The column “SIP-Approved Version” provides the version of the rule that is approved by 

EPA into SIP. This version may or may not be identical to the last amended version of 

the rule. 

2. The columns “EPA Approval Date” and “Citation” provide the date the U.S. EPA 

approved the rule into SIP, and the citation in the federal register. 

Information on Federal CTGs and ACTs in Table 1-1, 1-2 and 1-3

Table 1-2 and Table 1-3 contain a list of U.S. EPA CTGs and ACTs provided to SCAQMD staff 

from the U.S. EPA Region IX, and corresponding SCAQMD rules and regulations. A 

checkmark was put in Table 1-1, under column “On EPA Region 9’s CTG-ACT List”, for each 

District rule that has a correspondent CTG and/or ACT. 

Information on Beyond RACT Rules in Table 1-1

Since late 1990’s, there are at least three studies that evaluate the stringency and effectiveness of 

the District rules and regulations: 

1. EPA published a document titled “Beyond VOC RACT CTG Requirements, EPA-453/R95-010, in April 1995. A checkmark is provided in Table 1-1 for each District rule that 

was analyzed in this document 

2. CAPCOA published a document titled “Potential All Feasible Measures” in September 

2003. A checkmark is provided in Table 1-1 for each District rule that was analyzed in 

this document 

3. LADCO published a document titled “Midwest RPO Candidate Control Measures” in 

April 2005. Section 4 of this report, “Analysis of Reasonably Available Control 

Technology” discusses beyond RACT requirements in California. A checkmark is 

provided in Table 1-1 for each District rule that was analyzed in this document. 

The last three columns in Table 1-1 indicates whether any of the SCAQMD rules have been 

evaluated in any of the above three references.
Staff Report 8-Ho

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_ Appendix 1 12 

Table 1-1: List of SCAQMD SIP-Rules, CTGs-ACTs, and Beyond RACT Rules 17

Rule No Pollutant Rule Title 

Last 

Amended 

Date 

(Note 1) 

SIPApproved 

Version 

(Note 2) 

EPA 

Approval 

Date 

(Note 3) 

Citation (Note 4) 

On EPA 

Region 

9's CTGACT List 

(Note 5) 

19

EP

Bey

VO

RAC

CT

(Not

401 All Visible Emissions 11/9/2001 3/2/1984 1/29/1995 50 FR 3907 403 PM Fugitive Dust 12/11/1998 12/11/1998 2/17/2000 55 FR 8057 404 PM Particulate Matter - 

Concentration 

2/7/1986 2/7/1986 9/2/1998 63 FR 46659 

405 PM Solid Particulate Matter - 

Weight 

2/7/1986 2/7/1986 9/2/1998 63 FR 46659 

407 VOC Liquid and Gaseous Air 

Contaminants 

4/2/1982 4/2/1982 11/10/1982 47 FR 50864 

408 All Circumvention 5/7/1976 6/14/1978 43 FR 25686 409 All Combustion Contaminants 8/7/1981 8/7/1981 7/6/1982 47 FR 29231 431.1 SOx Sulfur Content of Gaseous 

Fuels 

6/12/1998 6/12/1998 12/3/1999 64 FR 67787 

431.2 SOx Sulfur Content of Liquid 

Fuels 

9/15/2000 5/4/1990 6/8/1999 64 FR 30396 

431.3 SOx Sulfur Content of Fossil 

Fuels 

5/7/1976 9/28/1981 46 FR 47451 

442 VOC Usage of Solvents 12/15/2000 12/15/2000 5/23/2002 67 FR 36105 √ 443 VOC Labeling of Solvents 5/7/1976 6/14/1978 43 FR 25686 443.1 VOC Labeling of Materials 

Containing Organic Solvents

12/5/1986 12/5/1986 9/12/2001 66 FR 47392 

444 PM Open Fires 12/21/2001 12/21/2001 4/8/2002 67 FR 16644 461 VOC Gasoline Transfer and 

Dispensing 

6/3/2005 1/9/2004 2/22/2005 70 FR 8520 √ √ 

463 VOC Storage of Organic Liquids 5/6/2005 3/11/1994 10/23/1996 61 FR 54941 √ √ 

17 Staff added footnotes to Rule 464, 466, 466.1, 467, 474, 1108, 1111, 1120, 1126, 1130.1, 1142, 1146.1, 1148, 1149, 1150.2, 1164, 

clarifications as suggested by EPA Region IX. 
Staff Report 8-Ho

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_ Appendix 1 13 

Table 1-1 (Continued) 

Rule No Pollutant Rule Title 

Last 

Amended 

Date 

(Note 1) 

SIPApproved 

Version 

(Note 2) 

EPA 

Approval 

Date 

(Note 3) 

Citation (Note 4) 

On EPA 

Region 

9's CTGACT List 

(Note 5) 

1

E

Be

V

RA

C

(N

464 18 VOC Wastewater Separators 12/7/1990 12/7/1990 2/24/1997 62 FR 8172 465 VOC Vacuum-Producing Devices 

or Systems 

8/13/1999 8/13/1999 3/1/2000 65 FR 10944 

466 19 VOC Pumps and Compressors 10/7/1983 10/7/1983 1/15/1987 52 FR 1627 466.1 18 VOC Valves and Flanges 3/16/1984 5/2/1980 7/8/1982 47 FR 29668 467 18 VOC Pressure Relief Devices 3/5/1982 3/5/1982 11/16/1983 48 FR 52054 468 SOx Sulfur Recovery Units 10/8/1976 6/14/1978 43 FR 25687 469 SOx Sulfuric Acid Units 2/13/1981 4/7/1976 6/14/1978 43 FR 25687 470 VOC Asphalt Air Blowing 5/7/1976 6/14/1978 43 FR 25687 472 PM Reduction of Animal Matter 5/7/1976 6/14/1978 43 FR 25686 474 20 NOx Fuel Burning Equipment - 

Oxides of Nitrogen 

12/4/1981 12/4/1981 7/6/1982 47 FR 29231 

475 NOx Electric Power Generating 

Equipment 

8/7/1978 10/8/1976 6/14/1978 43 FR 25687 

475.1 NOx Reduction of Oxides of 

Nitrogen 

CARB deleted 3/27/80 

 6/14/1978 43 FR 25687 

481 VOC Spray Coating Operations 1/11/2002 1/11/2002 8/26/2003 68 FR 51181 1101 SOx Secondary Lead 

Smelters/Sulfur Oxides 

10/7/1977 9/2/1981 46 FR 43968 

1102 VOC Petroleum Solvent Dry 

Cleaners 

11/17/2000 11/17/2000 7/17/2002 67 FR 46876 

18 Rule 1176, amended in September 13, 1996, contains current emission standards for waste water separators and is considered by EPA a19 Rule 1173, amended in December 6, 2002, contains current up-to-date standards for pumps, compressors, valves, flanges, and pressure 

EPA in 1995 as beyond VOC RACT CTG and by CAPCOA in 2003 as the most stringent control measure in California.

20 Series of Regulation XI rules, Rule 1146, 1146.1, 1146.2, and 1110.2 contain more stringent emission standards than Rule 474 and refer 
Staff Report 8-Ho

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_ Appendix 1 14 

Table 1-1 (Continued) 

Rule No Pollutant Rule Title 

Last 

Amended 

Date 

(Note 1) 

SIPApproved 

Version 

(Note 2) 

EPA 

Approval 

Date 

(Note 3) 

Citation (Note 4) 

On EPA 

Region 

9's CTGACT List 

(Note 5) 

1

E

Be

V

RA

C

(N

1102.1 VOC Perchloroethylene Dry 

Cleaning Systems (Repealed see rule 1421) 

Repealed 12/9/94 

12/7/1990 3/24/1992 57 FR 10136 

1103 VOC Pharmaceuticals and 

Cosmetics Manufacturing 

3/12/1999 3/12/1999 7/21/1999 64 FR 39037 √ 

1104 VOC Wood Flat Stock Coating 

Operation 

8/13/1999 8/13/1999 3/22/2000 65 FR 15240 √ 

1105.1 PM, NH3 Reduction of PM10 and 

Ammonia Emissions From Fluid Catalytic Cracking Units 

11/7/2003 11/7/2003 1/4/2006 71 FR 241 

1105 SOx Fluid Catalytic Cracking 

Units - Oxides of Sulfur 

9/1/1984 9/21/1984 7/12/1990 55 FR 28624 

1106 VOC Marine Coating Operations 1/13/1995 1/13/1995 7/14/1995 60 FR 36227 √ 1106.1 VOC Pleasure Craft Coating 

Operations 

2/12/1999 2/12/1999 8/31/1999 64 FR 47392 √ 

1107 VOC Coating of Metal Parts and 

Products 

1/6/2006 11/19/2001 8/13/2002 67 FR 52611 √ 

1108 21 VOC Cutback Asphalt 2/1/1985 2/1/1985 7/12/1990 55 FR 28624 √ 1108.1 21 VOC Emulsified Asphalt 11/4/1983 11/4/1983 1/24/1985 50 FR 3338 √ 1110 NOx Emissions from Stationary 

Internal Combustion Engines (Demonstration) 

Repealed 11/14/97 

11/6/1981 5/3/1984 49 FR 18822 √ 

21 Based on EPA’s recommendation, staff will assess the inventory and potential controls related to Rule 1108 and 1108.1 as part of the o

strategies. 
Staff Report 8-Ho

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_ Appendix 1 15 

Table 1-1 (Continued) 

Rule No Pollutant Rule Title 

Last 

Amended 

Date 

(Note 1) 

SIPApproved 

Version 

(Note 2) 

EPA 

Approval 

Date 

(Note 3) 

Citation (Note 4) 

On EPA 

Region 

9's CTGACT List 

(Note 5) 

19

EP

Bey

VO

RAC

CT

(Not

1111 22 NOx NOx Emissions from NaturalGas-Fired, Fan-Type Central 

Furnaces 

7/8/1983 7/8/1983 5/3/1984 49 FR 18830 

1112 NOx Emissions of Oxides of 

Nitrogen from Cement Kilns 

6/6/1986 1/8/1984 1/7/1986 51 FR 600 

1112.1 PM Emissions of Particulate 

Matter from Cement Kilns 

2/7/1986 2/7/1986 9/2/1998 63 FR 46659 

1113 VOC Architectural Coatings 7/9/2004 11/8/1996 6/21/1999 64 FR 33018 √ 1115 VOC Motor Vehicle Assembly Line 

Coating Operations 

5/12/1995 5/12/1995 7/14/1995 60 FR 36227 √ 

1117 NOx Emissions of Oxides of 

Nitrogen from Glass Melting Furnaces 

1/6/1984 1/6/1984 7/12/1990 55 FR 28624 √ 

1119 SOx Petroleum Coke Calcining 

Operations - Oxides of Sulfur

3/2/1979 3/2/1979 9/28/1981 46 FR 47451 

1120 23 PM Asphalt Pavement Heaters 8/4/1978 9/28/1981 46 FR 47451 1121 NOx Control of Nitrogen Oxides 

from Residential Type, Natural-Gas-Fired Water Heaters 

9/3/2004 12/10/1999 11/16/2001 66 FR 57666 

1122 VOC Solvent Degreasers 10/1/2004 10/1/2004 2/8/2006 71 FR 6350 √ 1122 VOC 10/1/2004 7/11/1997 4/2/1999 64 FR 15922 √ 1123 VOC Refinery Process 

Turnarounds 

12/7/1990 12/7/1990 8/11/1992 57 FR 35758 √ 

22 This rule is for residential space heating (self-contained space heater) and there is no CTG/ACT for this category. The emission stan

joule is the most stringent limit that District staff is aware of.

23 Rule 1120 contains only visible emission standards and limit for sulfur content of fuel calculated as H2S.
Staff Report 8-Ho

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_ Appendix 1 16 

Table 1-1 (Continued) 

Rule No Pollutant Rule Title 

Last 

Amended 

Date 

(Note 1) 

SIPApproved 

Version 

(Note 2) 

EPA 

Approval 

Date 

(Note 3) 

Citation (Note 4) 

On EPA 

Region 

9's CTGACT List 

(Note 5) 

19

EP

Bey

VO

RAC

CT

(Not

1124 VOC Aerospace Assembly and 

Component Manufacturing Operations 

9/21/2001 9/21/2001 8/13/2002 67 FR 52611 √ 

1125 VOC Metal Container, Closure, 

and Coil Coating Operations 

1/13/1995 1/13/1995 6/13/1995 60 FR 31081 √ √ 

1126 24 VOC Magnet Wire Coating 

Operations 

1/13/1995 1/13/1995 6/13/1995 60 FR 31081 √ 

1128 VOC Paper, Fabric and Film 

Coating Operations 

3/8/1996 3/8/1996 5/4/1999 64 FR 23774 √ √ 

1130 VOC Graphic Arts 10/8/1999 10/8/1999 9/13/2000 65 FR 55201 √ √ 1130.1 25 VOC Screen Printing Operations 12/13/1996 12/13/1996 8/21/1998 63 FR 44792 √ 1131 VOC Food Product Manufacturing 

and Processing Operations 

6/6/2003 6/6/2003 1/22/2004 69 FR 3018 

1132 VOC Further Control of VOC from 

High Emitting Spray Booths 

5/7/2004 3/5/2004 4/26/2004 69 FR 22445 √ 

 NOx Emissions of Oxides of 

Nitrogen from Stationary Gas Turbines 

8/8/1997 8/8/1997 8/1/2000 65 FR 46873 √ 

1135 NOx Emissions of Oxides of 

Nitrogen From Electric Power Generating Systems 

7/19/1991 7/19/1991 8/11/1998 63 FR 42721 

1136 VOC Wood Products Coatings 6/14/1996 6/14/1996 8/18/1998 63 FR 44132 √ 

24 Staff is not aware of any significant changes in technology that affect the original RACT determination by EPA in 1995. 25 Staff is not aware of any significant changes in technology that affect the original RACT determination by EPA in 1996. 
Staff Report 8-Ho

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_ Appendix 1 17 

Table 1-1 (Continued) 

Rule No Pollutant Rule Title 

Last 

Amended 

Date 

(Note 1) 

SIPApproved 

Version 

(Note 2) 

EPA 

Approval 

Date 

(Note 3) 

Citation (Note 4) 

On EPA 

Region 

9's CTGACT List 

(Note 5) 

19

EP

Bey

VO

RAC

CT

(No

1137 PM PM10 Reduction From 

Woodworking Operations 

2/1/2002 2/1/2002 1/22/2004 69 FR 3018 

1138 PM Control Of Emissions From 

Restaurant Operations 

11/14/1997 11/14/1997 7/11/2001 66 FR 36170 

1140 PM Abrasive Blasting 8/2/1985 9/28/1981 46 FR 47451 1141 VOC Control of Volatile Organic 

Compound Emissions from Resin Manufacturing 

11/17/2000 11/17/2000 8/13/2002 67 FR 52611 √ 

1141.1 VOC Coatings and Ink 

Manufacturing 

11/17/2000 11/17/2000 2/12/2002 67 FR 6410 √ 

1141.2 VOC Surfactant Manufacturing 1/11/2002 1/11/2002 8/26/2003 68 FR 51181 1142 26 VOC Marine Tank Vessel 

Operations 

7/19/1991 7/19/1991 12/13/1994 59 FR 64132 

1145 VOC Plastic, Rubber, Leather and 

Glass Coatings 

12/3/2004 2/14/1997 5/4/1999 64 FR 23774 √ 

1146 NOx Emissions of Oxides of 

Nitrogen from Industrial, Institutional and Commercial Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters 

11/17/2000 11/17/2000 4/8/2002 67 FR 16640 √ 

1146.1 27 NOx Emissions of NOx from 

Small Industrial, Institutional, and Commercial Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters 

5/13/1994 5/13/1994 9/6/1995 60 FR 46220 √ 

26 Staff is not aware of any significant changes in technology that affect the original RACT determination by EPA in 1991.27 Staff will amend Rule 1146.1 to lower the emission limits following the latest rule development in San Joaquin and will hold a Public H
Staff Report 8-Ho

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_ Appendix 1 18 

Table 1-1 (Continued) 

Rule No Pollutant Rule Title 

Last 

Amended 

Date 

(Note 1) 

SIPApproved 

Version 

(Note 2) 

EPA 

Approval 

Date 

(Note 3) 

Citation (Note 4) 

On EPA 

Region 

9's CTGACT List 

(Note 5) 

1

E

Be

V

RA

C

(N

1146.2 NOx Emissions of Oxides of 

Nitrogen from Large Water Heaters and Small Boilers 

1/7/2005 1/9/1998 4/8/2002 67 FR 16640 √ 

1148 28 VOC Thermally Enhanced Oil 

Recovery Wells 

11/5/1982 11/5/1982 10/19/1984 40 FR 41028 

1149 29 VOC Storage Tank Degassing 7/14/1995 7/14/1995 8/19/1999 64 FR 45175 1150.1 VOC Control of Gaseous 

Emissions from Active Landfills 

3/17/2000 3/17/2000 7/1/2002 67 FR 44062 

1150.2 30 VOC Control of Gaseous 

Emissions from Inactive Landfills 

4/10/1998 10/18/1985 5/6/1997 62 FR 24574 

1151 VOC Motor Vehicle and Mobile 

Equipment Non-Assembly Line Coating Operations 

12/2/2005 12/11/1998 5/26/2000 65 FR 34101 √ 

1153 VOC Commercial Bakery Ovens 11/13/1995 1/13/1995 8/8/1995 60 FR 40285 √ 1158 PM Storage, Handling and 

Transport of Petroleum Coke 

6/11/1999 6/11/1999 1/15/1987 67 FR 39616 

1159 NOx Nitric Acid Units - Oxides of 

Nitrogen 

12/6/1985 12/6/1985 7/12/1990 55 FR 28622 √ 

1162 VOC Polyester Resin Operations 7/8/2005 11/17/2000 2/12/2002 67 FR 6410 √ 1164 31 VOC Semiconductor Manufacturing 1/13/1995 1/13/1995 2/1/1996 61 FR 3579 

28 Staff is not aware of any significant changes in technology that affect the original RACT determination by EPA in 1982.29 Staff is not aware of any significant changes in technology that affect the original RACT determination by EPA in 1995.30 The rule is rescinded on April 10, 1998.31 Staff is not aware of any significant changes in technology that affect the original RACT determination by EPA in 1995.
Staff Report 8-Ho

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_ Appendix 1 19 

Table 1-1 (Continued) 

Rule No Pollutant Rule Title 

Last 

Amended 

Date 

(Note 1) 

SIPApproved 

Version 

(Note 2) 

EPA 

Approval 

Date 

(Note 3) 

Citation (Note 4) 

On EPA 

Region 

9's CTGACT List 

(Note 5) 

19

EP

Bey

VO

RAC

CT

(Not

1166 VOC Volatile Organic Compound 

Emissions from Decontamination of Soil 

5/11/2001 7/14/1995 8/17/1998 63 FR 43881 

1168 VOC Adhesive and Sealant 

Applications 

1/7/2005 10/3/2003 12/12/2003 68 FR 69320 

1171 VOC Solvent Cleaning Operations 5/6/2005 11/7/2003 7/27/2004 70 FR 38023 1171 VOC Solvent Cleaning Operations 11/7/2003 11/7/2003 7/27/2004 69 FR 44599 1173 VOC Fugitive Emissions of 

Volatile Organic Compounds 

12/6/2002 5/13/1994 8/25/1994 59 FR 43751 √ √ 

1174 32 VOC Control of Volatile Organic 

Compound Emissions from the Ignition of Barbecue Charcoal 

10/5/1990 10/5/1990 10/4/1994 59 FR 50498 

1175 33 VOC Control of Emissions from 

the Manufacture of Polymeric Cellular (Foam) Products 

5/13/1994 5/13/1994 8/25/1994 59 FR 43751 

1176 VOC Sumps and Wastewater 

Separators (Amended 9/13/96) 

9/13/1996 9/13/1996 10/7/2002 67 FR 62376 √ √ 

1178 VOC Further Reductions of VOC 

Emissions From Storage Tanks at Petroleum Facilities

12/21/2001 12/21/2001 8/26/2003 68 FR 51181 √ 

1179 VOC Publicly Owned Treatment 

Works Operations 

3/6/1992 3/6/1992 10/4/1994 59 FR 50498 

32 Staff is not aware of any significant changes in technology that affect the original RACT determination by EPA in 1990. This is not a C33 Staff is not aware of any significant changes in technology that affect the original RACT determination by EPA in 1994.
Staff Report 8-Ho

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_ Appendix 1 20 

Table 1-1 (Continued) 

Rule No Pollutant Rule Title 

Last 

Amended 

Date 

(Note 1) 

SIPApproved 

Version 

(Note 2) 

EPA 

Approval 

Date 

(Note 3) 

Citation (Note 4) 

On EPA 

Region 

9's CTGACT List 

(Note 5) 

19

EP

Bey

VO

RAC

CT

(Not

1186 VOC Outer Continental Shelf 

(OCS) Air Regulations 

4/2/2004 9/10/1999 6/10/2000 67 FR 39616 

1189 PM PM10 Emissions from Paved 

and Unpaved Roads, and Livestock Operations 

1/21/2000 1/21/2000 6/8/2001 66 FR 30815 

2000 NOx, SOx General 5/6/2005 5/11/2001 9/4/2003 68 FR 52512 2001 NOx, SOx Applicability 5/6/2005 5/11/2001 9/4/2003 68 FR 52512 2002 NOx, SOx Allocations for Oxides of 

Nitrogen (NOx) and Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) 

1/7/2005 5/11/2001 9/4/2003 68 FR 52512 

2004 NOx, SOx Requirements 5/11/2001 5/11/2001 9/4/2003 68 FR 52512 2005 NOx, SOx New Source Review for 

RECLAIM 

5/6/2005 4/20/2001 9/4/2003 68 FR 52512 

2006 NOx, SOx Permits 5/11/2001 5/11/2001 9/4/2003 68 FR 52512 2007 NOx, SOx Trading Requirements 5/6/2005 12/5/2003 7/26/2004 69 FR 44461 2008 NOx, SOx Mobile Source Credits 10/15/1993 10/15/1993 11/8/1996 61 FR 57775 2010 NOx, SOx Administrative Remedies & 

Sanctions 

1/7/2005 5/11/2001 9/4/2003 68 FR 52512 

2011 NOx Requirements for Monitoring, 

Reporting, and Recordkeeping for Oxides of Sulfur 

5/6/2005 12/5/2003 7/26/2004 69 FR 44461 

2011 NOx 12/7/1995 6/15/1998 63 FR 32621 2011-2 NOx 3/16/2001 9/4/2003 68 FR 52512 
Staff Report 8-Ho

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_ Appendix 1 21 

Table 1-1 (Continued) 

Rule No Pollutant Rule Title 

Last 

Amended 

Date 

(Note 1) 

SIPApproved 

Version 

(Note 2) 

EPA 

Approval 

Date 

(Note 3) 

Citation (Note 4) 

On EPA 

Region 

9's CTGACT List 

(Note 5) 

19

EP

Bey

VO

RAC

CT

(Not

2012 SOx Requirements for Monitoring, 

Reporting, and Recordkeeping for Sox 

5/6/2005 12/5/2003 7/26/2004 69 FR 44461 

2012 SOx 12/7/1995 6/15/1998 63 FR 32621 2012-2 SOx 3/16/2001 9/4/2003 68 FR 52512 2015 NOx, SOx Backstop Provisions 6/4/2004 6/4/2004 12/21/2004 69 FR 76417 2015 NOx, SOx Backstop Provisions 5/11/2001 5/11/2001 9/4/2003 68 FR 52512 

Note 1. "Latest Amended Date" is from SCAQMD Rule Book as of March 31, 2006 2. "SIP Approved Version" is the version of a rule reviewed and approved by EPA, posted on EPA Region IX web 3. "EPA Approval Date" is the date approved by EPA, posted on EPA Region IX web site as of March 31, 2006 4. “Citation” is the reference to the Federal Register posted on EPA Region IX web site as of March 31, 2006 

5. List of CTG-ATCs provided by EPA Region IX on March 24, 2006 6. Reference: Beyond VOC RACT CTG Requirements, EPA-453/R-95-010, and NTIS PB-95-239-497 7. Reference: Potential All Feasible Measures, prepared by the CAPCOA Rules Subcommittee, September 2003 

8. Reference: Identification and Evaluation of Candidate Control Measures, LADCO, April 14, 2005 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Appendix 1 22 June 2006 

Table 1-2: List of Federal CTGs and District Rules

General CTGs SCAQMD Rule 

No 

COATING & SOLVENTS 

Aerospace Control of VOC Emissions from Coating Operations at 

Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Operations CTG 

& MACT (See 59 FR 29216, 6/6/1994); CTG (Final), 

EPA-453/R-97-004, 12/97). 

Rule 1124 

Automobile 

Coating 

Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing

Stationary Sources - Volume II: Surface Coating of 

Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and LightDuty Trucks, EPA-450/2-77-008, 5/77, NTIS PB-272-

445 

Rule 1151 

Graphic Arts Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing 

Stationary Sources, Volume VIII: Graphic Arts - 

Rotogravure and Flexography EPA-450/2-78-033, 

12/78, NTIS PB 292-490 

Rule 1130 

Large Appliances Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing 

Stationary Sources, Volume V: Surface Coating of 

Large Appliances, EPA-450/2-77-034, NTIS PB-278-

259. 

Rule 1107, 1132 

Magnet Wire Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing 

Stationary Sources, Volume IV: Surface Coating of 

Insulation of Magnet Wire, EPA-450/2-77-033, 12/77, 

NTIS PB-278-258 

Rule 1126 

Metal Coil, 

Container, & 

Closure 

Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing

Stationary Sources - Volume II: Surface Coating of 

Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and LightDuty Trucks, EPA-450/2-77-008, 5/77, NTIS PB-272-

445. 

Rule 1125 

Metal Furniture Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing 

Stationary Sources, Volume III: Surface Coating of 

Metal Furniture, EPA-450/2-77-032, 12/77, NTIS PB278-257 

Rule 1107 

Metal Parts & 

Products 

Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing

Stationary Sources, Volume VI: Surface Coating of 

Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products, EPA-450/2-

78-015, 6/78, NTIS PB-286-157 

Rule 1107 

Paper & Fabric Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing 

Stationary Sources - Volume II: Surface Coating of 

Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and LightDuty Trucks, EPA-450/2-77-008, 5/77, NTIS PB-272-

445. 

Rule 1128 

Ships Surface Coating Operations at Shipbuilding and Ship 

Repair Facilities, EPA-453/R-94-032, 4/94, NTIS PB-94-

181-864). This document was superseded by the 

Shipbuilding CTG which was issued in 1996. 

Rule 1106, 

1106.1 

Solvent Cleaning Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Solvent 

Metal Cleaning, EPA-450/2-77-022, 11/77, NTIS PB274-557 

Rule 1122 

Rule 1171 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Appendix 1 23 June 2006 

Table 1-2 (Continued) 

General CTGs SCAQMD Rule 

No 

Wood Coating Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing 

Stationary Sources, Volume VII: Factory Surface of Flat 

Wood Paneling, EPA-450/2-78-032, 6/78, NTIS PB 286-

199 

Rule 1104 

Wood Furniture Control of VOC Emissions from Wood Furniture 

Manufacturing Operations CTG-MACT draft MACT our 

5-94; Final CTG, EPA-453/R-96-007, 4/96, NTIS PB-96-

178-769, Also see 61 FR 25223 and 61 FR 50823, 

9/27/96. 

Rule 1136 

PETROLEUM 

Gasoline Plants Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Bulk 

Gasoline Plants, EPA-450/2-77-035, 12/77, NTIS PB276-722 

Rule 462 

Natural 

Gas/Gasoline 

Control of VOC Equipment Leaks from Natural 

Gas/Gasoline Processing Plants, EPA-450/2-83-007, 

12/83, NTIS PB-84-161-520. 

Rule 1173 

Refineries Control of Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems, 

Wastewater Separators, and Process Unit Turnarounds, 

EPA-450/2-77-025, 10/77, NTIS PB-275-662 

Rule 465 

Refineries Control of VOC Leaks from Petroleum Refinery 

Equipment, EPA-450/2-78-036, 6/78, NTIS PB-286-158 

Rule 1173 

Service Stations Design Criteria for Stage I Vapor Control Systems - 

Gasoline Service Stations, 11/75 

Rule 461 

Synthetic Organic 

Chemical 

Control of VOC Emissions from Air Oxidation Processes 

in Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry, 

EPA-450/3-84-015, 12/84, NTIS PB-85-164-275 

Control of VOC Emissions from Reactor Processes and

Distillation Operations in SOCMI, EPA-450/4-91-031,

11/15/93, NTIS PB-92-180-009 

Rule 442, 40 

CFR Part 60 

Subpart NNN, 

RRR adopted by 

reference 

without change 

to Regulation IX 

Tanks Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Storage of 

Petroleum Liquids in Fixed Roof Tanks (EPA-450/2-77-

036, 12/77, NTIS PB-276-749), CTG. 

Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Petroleum 

Liquid Storage in External Floating Roof Tanks (EPA450-2/78-047, 12/78, NTIS PB-290-579), CTG. 

Rule 463, 1178 

Tank Trucks Control of Hydrocarbons from Tank Truck Gasoline 

Loading Terminals (EPA-450/2-77-026, 12/77, NTIS 

PB-275-060), CTG. EPA R9 has an electronic copy. 

Control of VOC Leaks from Gasoline Tank Trucks and 

Vapor Collection Systems (EPA-450/2-78-051, 12/78, 

NTIS PB-290-568), CTG. EPA R9 has an electronic 

copy. 

Rule 461, 462 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Appendix 1 24 June 2006 

Table 1-2 (Continued) 

General CTGs SCAQMD Rule 

No 

OTHER 

Cutback Asphalt Control of VOC from Use of Cutback Asphalt, EPA450/2-77-037, NTIS PB 278-185 Rule 1108, 

1108.1 

Dry Cleaning Control of VOC Emissions from Large Petroleum Dry 

Cleaners, EPA-450/3-82-009 9/82, NTIS PB-83-124-

875 

Rule 1102, 

1102.1 

Pharmaceutical 

Products 

Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture 

of Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products, EPA-450/2-

78-029, 1278, NTIS PB-290-580 

Rule 1103 

Polyester Resin Control of VOC Emissions from Manufacture of HighDensity Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and Polystyrene 

Resins, EPA-450/3-83-008, 11/83, NTIS PB-84-134-600

Control of VOC Fugitive Emissions from Synthetic 

Organic Chemical Polymer and Resin Manufacturing 

Equipment, EPA-450/3-83-006, 3/84,NTIS PB-84-189-

372 

Rule 1162 

Rubber Tires Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture 

of Pneumatic Rubber Tires, EPA-450/2-78-030, 12/78,

NTIS PB-290-557 

Rule 442 and 40 

CFR Part 60 

Subpart BBB 

adopted by 

reference 

without change 

to Regulation IX 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Appendix 1 25 June 2006 

Table 1-3: List of Federal ACTs and District Rules

General ACTs / Other Documents SCAQMD Rule No 

COATING & SOLVENTS 

Coating Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from 

Existing Stationary Sources, Volume I: Control 

Methods for Surface Coating Operations, EPA450/2-76-028, 11/76, NTIS PB-260-386 

Rule 1132 

Architectural 

Coatings 

National VOC Emission Standards for 

Architectural Coatings, 40 CFR 59 Subpart D, 

9/11/98 

Rule 1113 

Automobile 

Coating 

Reduction of VOC Emissions from Automobile 

Refinishing, EPA-450/3-88-009, 10/88, NTIS 

PB-89-148-282 

Surface Coating of Automotive/Transportation 

and Business Machine Plastic Parts, EPA453/R-94-017, 2/94, NTIS PB-94-158-086 

Auto. Refinishing, EPA-453/R-94-031, 4/94, 

NTIS PB-94-191-699. Note a national rule was 

issued in 1998 after the ACT. See 40 CFR 

59.100. 

National VOC Emission Standards for 

Automobile Refinish Coatings, 40 CFR 59 

Subpart B, 9/11/98 

Rule 1151 

Graphic Arts Offset Lithographic Printing, EPA-453/R-94-

054, 6/94, NTIS PB-95-201-018 

Rule 1130 

Plastic Parts Surface Coating of Automotive/Transportation 

and Business Machine Plastic Parts, EPA 

453/R-94-017, 2/94. 

Rule 1128, 1145 

 See references under automobile coating. Rule 1115

Solvent Cleaning Halogenated Solvent Cleaners, EPA-450/3-89-

030, 8/89, NTIS PB-90-103-268 

Industrial Cleaning Solvents, EPA-453/R-94-

015, 2/94, NTIS PB-94-156-79 

Rule 1122 

Rule 1171 

Traffic Markings Reduction of VOC Emissions from the 

Application of Traffic Markings, EPA-450/3-88-

007, 8/88, NTIS PB-89-148-274, ACT. The 

Architectural and Industrial Maintenance 

Coatings rule included limits for traffic markings 

and superseded the ACT. See 40 CFR 59.4 

Rule 1113 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Appendix 1 26 June 2006 

Table 1-3 (Continued) 

General ACTs / Other Documents SCAQMD Rule No 

Wood Furniture Control Techniques for Organic Emissions from 

Plywood Veneer Dryers, EPA-450/3-83-012. 

May 1983. This document is labeled as a 

control technique document (CTD) rather than 

an ACT. However, the information is similar to 

that in an ACT. 

Rule 1136 

PETROLEUM 

Refineries Control Technology Center Document - 

Industrial Wastewater Volatile Organic 

Compound Emissions - Background 

Information for BACT/LAER Determinations, 

EPA-40/3-90-004, NTIS PB90-194754 

Rule 1176 

Service Stations Technical Guidance -- Stage II Vapor Recovery 

Systems for Control of Vehicle Refueling 

Emissions at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities, 

EPA-450/3-91-022a & b, 11/91 

Rule 461 

 Gasoline Vapor Recovery Guidelines - 

Minimum SIP Requirements for EPA Region IX 

to Approve a Phase I or Phase II Gasoline 

Transfer Rule for Ozone Nonattainment Areas, 

EPA Region 9, 4/00 

Rule 461 

COMBUSTION 

Boilers, Steam 

Generators, 

Process Heaters 

ACT Document -- NOx Emissions from 

Process Heaters (Revised), EPA-453/R-93-

034, 9/93. 

Rule 1146, 1146.1, 1146.2, 

RECLAIM 

 ACT Document -- NOx Emissions from Utility 

Boilers, EPA-453/R-94-023, 3/94 

Rule 1146, 1146.1, 1146.2, 

RECLAIM 

 ACT Document -- NOx Emissions from 

Industrial/Commercial/Institutional (ICI) Boilers 

(EPA-453/R-94-022, 3/94 

Rule 1146, 1146.1, 1146.2, 

RECLAIM 

Cement Kilns ACT Document -- NOx Emissions from Cement 

Manufacturing (EPA-453/R-94-004, 3/94). 

Updated September 2000. 

Rule 1112, 1112.1, 1156, 

RECLAIM 

Gas Turbines ACT Document -- NOx Emissions from 

Stationary Gas Turbines (EPA-453/R-93-007, 

1/93) 

Rule 1134, RECLAIM 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Appendix 1 27 June 2006 

Table 1-3 (Continued) 

General ACTs / Other Documents SCAQMD Rule No 

Glass Furnaces ACT Document -- NOx Emissions from Glass 

Manufacturing (EPA-453/R-94-037, 6/94). 

Rule 1117, RECLAIM 

Internal 

Combustion 

Engines 

ACT Document -- NOx Emissions from 

Stationary IC Engines, EPA-453/R-93-032, 

7/93. Updated 9/2000. 

Rule 1110, 1110.1, 1110.2, 

RECLAIM 

Iron and Steel NOx emissions from Iron and Steel Mills, EPA 

453/R-94-065, 9/94. 

Rule 404, 405, 407, 409, 

RECLAIM, 40 CFR Part 60 

Subpart N adopted by 

reference without change to 

Regulation IX 

Municipal Waste 

Combustion 

40 CFR 60 subpart Cb - Emission Guidelines 

and Compliance Schedules for Municipal 

Waste Combustors. 

RECLAIM, 40 CFR Part 60 

Subpart Ea, adopted by 

reference without change to 

Regulation IX 

 40 CFR 62 subpart FFF, Federal Plan for 

existing large MWC units. 

RECLAIM, 40 CFR Part 60 

Subpart Ea, adopted by 

reference without change to 

Regulation IX 

OTHER 

Bakeries Bakery Oven Emissions, EPA-453/R-92-

017,12/92 

Rule 1153 

 Issues Concerning Bakery RACT 

Requirements, 2/8/95 

Rule 1153 

Dry Cleaning Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from 

Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Systems 

(EPA-450/2-78-050, 12/78, NTIS PB-290-613), 

(CTG no longer relevant as PERC is exempted 

as a VOC - however there is a MACT std for 

PERC drycleaners) 

Rule 1102, 1102.1 

Ethylene Oxide Ethylene Oxide Sterilization/Fumigation 

Operations, EPA-450/3-89-007, 3/89, NTIS PB90-131-434 

Rule 1103, 40CFR Part 60 

Subpart Ec adopted by 

reference without change to 

Regulation IX 

Fertilizer Control of Fluoride Emissions From Existing 

Phosphate Fertilizer Plants, EPA-450/2-77-

005, 3/77 

40CFR Part 60 Subpart T, 

U, V, W adopted by 

reference without change to 

Regulation IX 

Ink & Paint 

Manufacture 

Control of VOC Emissions from Ink and Paint 

Manufacturing Processes, EPA-450/3-92-013, 

4/92 

Rule 1141.1 

Leather Tanning Air Emissions and Control Technology for 

Leather Tanning and Finishing Operations, 

EPA-453/R-93-025, 6/93 

Rule 442 

Rule 1145 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Appendix 1 28 June 2006 

Table 1-3 (Continued)

General ACTs / Other Documents SCAQMD Rule No 

Nitric & Adipic Acid Nitric and Adipic Acid Manufacturing Plants, 

EPA-450/3-91-026, 12/91 

40CFR Part 60 Subpart G 

adopted by reference 

without change to 

Regulation IX 

Pesticides Control of VOC Emissions from the Application 

of Agricultural Pesticides, EPA-453/R-92-011, 

3/93, NTIS PB-93-199-131 

State Regulation 

Polyester Resin Control of VOC Emissions from Manufacture of 

Styrene-Butadiene Copolymers - Preliminary 

Draft 

Rule 1162 

 Polystyrene Foam Manufacturing, EPA 450/3-

90-020 NTIS PB91-102111 

Rule 1175 

Sulfuric Acid Control of Sulfuric Acid Mist Emissions from 

Existing Sulfuric Acid Production Units, EPA450/2-77-019, 9/77 

40CFR Part 60 Subpart H 

adopted by reference 

without change to 

Regulation IX 

Wastewater Control of VOC Emissions from Industrial

Wastewater CTG draft EPA-453/D-93-056 

9/92) 

Rule 1176, 40 CFR Part 60 

Subpart QQQ adopted by 

reference without change to 

Regulation IX 

 ACT Document: Air Emissions from Industrial 

Wastewater (4/94), ACT consists of cover 

memo with option tables and CTG draft. 

Rule 1176, 40 CFR Part 60 

Subpart QQQ adopted by 

reference without change to 

Regulation IX 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Appendix 2 29 June 2006 

Appendix 2 - RACT Analysis for Group I Rules 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Appendix 2 30 June 2006 

Group I rules are the rules approved by the U.S. EPA into the SIP for certain category of 

processes and equipment, and CTG/ACT became available for this category after the date of 

approval. 

The following 7 rules are in Group I rules: 

 Rule 1106 (CTG/ACT source) 

 Rule 1117 (CTG/ACT source) 

 Rule 1136 (CTG/ACT source) 

 Rule 1153 (CTG/ACT source) 

 Rule 1159 (CTG/ACT source) 

 Rule 1173 (CTG/ACT source) 

 Rule 1176 (CTG/ACT source) 

For each of these rules, SCAQMD staff’s analysis includes: 

1) A summary of the requirements in the rule, specifically the emissions limits, monitoring, 

testing and record keeping requirements, and the work practices; 

2) A summary of the emission standards, and if available, the work practices, monitoring, 

testing and record keeping recommended in the CTG/ATC; 

3) An evaluation for RACT, which is a comparison between the rule requirements with the 

recommended standards in the CTG/ATC; 

4) A conclusion or recommendation. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Appendix 2 31 

Rule 1106 - Marine Coating Operations (Amended 1/13/95) EMISSION LIMIT MONITORING, TESTINRule 1106 Applicable to all coating operations of boats, ships, and their appurtenances and to buoys and oil drilling rigs intended for marine environment (excluding ships, boats for recreational purposes) • Coating-specific emission limits (grams VOC per liter of coating, less water and exempt compounds) are specified under each specific category range from 275 – 780 g/L. • In lieu of meeting with coating-specific emission limits, the operator using non-compliant coatings may comply by using an air pollution control system with at least 85% destruction efficiency. • Solvent cleaning operations must comply with Rule 1171 • Daily recordkeeping is 

Records must include aRule 109(c)(1). Rule 1manufacturer product spappropriate SCAQMD, 

• The approved test meth

Reference Method 24, 2304, 311, 25.1; and othe

EPA CTG for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Operations (Surface Coating), 61 FR 44050, 8/27/96 • The coating-specific emission limits (grams VOC per liter of coating, less water and exempt compounds) specified under Table 1 of this CTG range from 340 – 780 g/L. • The CTG also includes equivalent solid-based emission limits for situations where thinning solvent is added to a coating. • The CTG does not include an option for the use of add-on controls since the type and size of tanks inside a ship that may be painted at a ship-yard vary and make the case-by- case cost effectiveness difficult to evaluate. EVALUATION FOR RACT The emission limits in EPA’s CTG are as stringent or less stringent than the emission limits set in Rule 1106. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Rule 1106 meets federal RACT requirements. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Appendix 2 32 

Rule 1117 - Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Glass Melting Furnaces (Amended 1/6/84) EMISSION LIMIT MONITOR

REC

Rule 1117 Applicable to all glass melting furnaces 4.0 lb/NOx per ton of glass pulled None EPA ACT Document – NOx Emissions From Glass Manufacturing, EPA-453/R-93- 007, 6/94 • Uncontrolled emission levels are reported to have a range from 2.7 lbs to 27.1 lbs NOx per ton glass pulled. • Control efficiencies are reported to have a range from 10% - 85%. EVALUATION FOR RACT 1) ACT Document – NOx Emissions From Glass Manufacturing, EPA-453/R-93-007, 6/94 Using the information in this ACT, the most stringent controlled emission level is estimated to be about: (27.1) (1-0.85) = 4 lbs NOx which is equivalent to the level regulated in Rule 1117. 2) SCAQMD RECLAIM Regulation XX In addition, all glass melting furnaces subject to this rule are currently operating in the SCAQMD emission cap-and-trade program (R

RECLAIM is considered by EPA as meeting RACT(71 FR 28290). Regarding monitoring, testing and/or recordkeeping requirements, all major NOx sources in RECLAIM are required to have a continuo

monitoring system that meets the requirements for certification and Quality Assurance/Quality Control specified in Chapter 2, Appendare similar to 40 CFR 60 Appendix B & F requirements, and all large NOx sources are required to have a totalizing fuel meter and coonce every three years. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Rule 1117 meets federal RACT requirements. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Appendix 2 33 

Rule 1136 – Wood Products Coating (Amended 6/14/96) EMISSION LIMIT M

Rule 1136 Applicable to all applications of coatings or strippers to, and surface preparation of, any wood products, including furniture, cabinets, shutters, frames and toys (excluding residential noncommercial operations) • Emission limits range from 0.21 - 0.36 lbs VOC per lbs of solids. • The rule contains three formats for VOC limits, i.e. grams/liter, lbs/gallon coating less water and exempt compounds, and lbs/lbs solids coating) • Averaging provisions are allowed provided that emissions from the coatings being averaged are less than or equal to 90% of the emissions from compliant coatings. • Add-on control is allowed provided that equivalent or greater amount of emission reductions are achieved compared to using compliant coatings. • Transfer efficiency is at least 65%, or operator must use certain type of equipment (e.g. HVLP) • Solvent cleaning operations must comply with Rule 1171 • 

• 

• EPA CTG Documents - Control of VOC Emissions from Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations, EPA-453/R- 96-007, 4/96 • 61 FR 25223, 5/20/96 • 61 FR 50823, 9/27/96 • The emission limits specified are:  0.8 lbs VOC per lb of solids for waterborne topcoats; or  2.0 - 2.3 lbs VOC per lb of solids for higher-solids sealers and topcoats. • The CTG does not contain emission limits in grams/liter or lbs/gal. • The CTG does not contain averaging provision • The CTG does not specify minimum transfer efficiency and recommend coating application, however, it deters the use of conventional air spray application. • The CTG does not discuss the application of add-on control device • Other work practices recommended are: 1) close containers when not in use; 2) conduct visible inspection for leaks; 3) develop and implement inspection & maintenance (I&M) plan; 4) ban the use of conventional air guns, but the CTG does not specify minimum transfer efficiency; 5) recommend the use of strippable spray booth materials over the use of solvents for spray booth cleaning. NoEVALUATION FOR RACT The emission limits recommended in the CTGs are less stringent than those in Rule 1136. In addition, the work practices in the CTG are CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Rule 1136 meets federal RACT requirements. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Appendix 2 34 

Rule 1153 - Commercial Bakery Ovens (Amended 1/13/95) EMISSION LIMIT Rule 1153 Applicable to existing and new bakery ovens which emit more than 50 lbs/day on an uncontrolled basis For existing bakery ovens: • Emission reduction of 70% or more is required for ovens emit between 50 lbs - 100 lbs VOC/day, or • Emission reduction of 95% or more for ovens emitting more than 100 lbs/day For new bakery ovens: • Emission reduction of 95% or more is required T

S

• EPA ACT Document – Bakery Oven Emissions, EPA-453/R-92-017, 12/92 • EPA Document - Issues Concerning Bakery RACT Requirements, 2/8/96 • 80% - 95% emission reductions • EPA allows the states to determine appropriate exemption levels for small emitting ovens. EVALUATION FOR RACT Rule 1153 requires 95% emission reduction for “major” sources emitting more 50 lbs/day, or 9 tons per year assuming 365 operation da

stringent level of control recommended in the ACT. For smaller categories of ovens (non major sources), Rule 1153 requires 70% em

than the level of 80% recommended in the ACT. There is no CTG for this source category, therefore there is no mandated level of co

control recommended in the ACT however is not mandated, and since EPA allows the states to determine appropriate level of control 

selected the cut-off point for control at 70% and considered that this is RACT for non-major bakery ovens. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Rule 1153 meets federal RACT requirements. SCAQMD may, if needed, reevaluate the control level (i.e. 95% instead of 70%

appropriateness of the exemption level (i.e. for ovens emitting less than 9 tons VOC per year) 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Appendix 2 35 

Rule 1159 – Nitric Acid Units – Oxides of Nitrogen (Adopted 12/6/85) EMISSION LIMIT MONRule 1159 Applicable to all nitric acid production unit • 450 ppmv, averaged over 15 consecutive minutes, or • 237 ppmv, averaged over 60 consecutive minutes; or • 3 lbs/ton acid produced, averaged over 60 consecutive minutes. None EPA ACT Document – Nitric and Adipic Acid Manufacturing Plants, EPA-450/3-91-026, 12/91 • Does not contain emission standards • Average control efficiencies were reported to be from 86% - 95%. EVALUATION FOR RACT SCAQMD RECLAIM Regulation XX The ACT does not include mandated emission standards. All nitric acid manufacturing plants subject to this rule are currently operat

cap-and-trade program (RECLAIM) program, which EPA proposed to approve into SIP as it meet RACT on May 16, 2006 (71 FR 28290

Regarding monitoring, testing and/or recordkeeping requirements, all major NOx sources in RECLAIM are required to have a con

monitoring system that meets the requirements for certification and Quality Assurance/Quality Control specified in Chapter 2, Appen

similar to 40 CFR 60 Appendix B & F requirements, and all large NOx sources are required to have a totalizing fuel meter and conduct 

three years. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Rule 1159 meets federal RACT requirements. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Appendix 2 36 

Rule 1173 - Fugitive Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds (Amended 12/6/02) EMISSION LIMIT MONITORING, TESTING ANRule 1173 Applicable to valves, fittings, pumps, compressors, pressure relief devices (PRD), diaphragms, hatches, sight-glasses, and meters at refineries, chemical plants, oil and gas production fields, natural gas processing plants, and pipeline transfer stations. • Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) program to reduce fugitive emissions • Threshold for leaks are:  for light liquid/gas/vapor service >10,000 ppmv,  for PRDs >200 ppmv, and  for pumps in heavy liquid >100 ppmv • For atmospheric PRDs, either:  use vapor recovery or add-on control if the refinery experiences where i) a second release of more than 500 lbs VOC within any five year period, or ii) any release of 2,000 lbs VOC in any 24 hour period; or  pay mitigation fee. • Inspection frequency for leaks:  Accessible pumps, compresso

visually once every 8-hr perio

 PRD: annually and re-inspec

relief  Other accessible components

 All inaccessible components: 

• Repair leaking components promp

days depending to the component 

leaks • Monitor PRD with tamper proof e

telltale indicators • Conduct a failure analysis for eve

500 lbs VOC in 24-hour period • Inspection method is EPA Refere

(measurements are taken at the so

EPA ACT Document – Petroleum Refinery Tier 2 BACT Analysis Report, 1/16/01 • Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) program to reduce fugitive emissions in various NESHAP and NSPS. The requirements in NESHAP, 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart H (HON) are the most stringent. • In HON, threshold for leaks are:  for pumps in light liquid service >10,000 ppmv in Phase I and >5000 ppmv in Phase II and Phase III  for valves in light liquid/gas/vapor service >10,000 ppmv in Phase I and >500 ppmv in Phase II and Phase III  for compressors >500 ppmv  for PRDs >500 ppmv,  for pumps and other components in heavy liquid service, from >500 ppmv to >5,000 ppmv depending on type of components • Inspection frequencies for leaks v

depending on the type of componnumber of leaking components de

• Repair leaking components promp

days depending to the component 

leaks, The first attempt at repair i

accomplished no later than 5 days 

• Inspection method is EPA Refere
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Appendix 2 37 

Rule 1173 (Continued) EVALUATION FOR RACT 1) ACT Document – Petroleum Refinery Tier 2 BACT Analysis Report, 1/16/01 Background The most recent CTG was developed to address specifically Tier 2 program at refineries. Tier 2 standards are aimed to reduce exhaust g

light trucks, including minivans, sport utility vehicles, and pickup trucks. As part of the Tier 2 program, refineries must produce gasolin

to meet an average of 30 ppmv beginning in 2005. In order to produce gasoline with lower sulfur content, refineries may need modifications to their existing equipment, which may result in permit applications that trigger the New Source Review (NSR) regulatprovides technical information needed in evaluating BACT and LAER for certain refinery units including boilers, heaters, hydro treating 

sour water strippers, and hydrogen plants, particularly in the control of NOx and fugitive emissions. Information on fugitive emissions 

Table B-2 of this report containing discussion on the LDAR requirements in NSPS and NESHAP, specifically in NESHAP 40 CFR ParCFR Part 63, Subpart CC and 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart GGG for refineries. A summary is tabulated in the Table above in parallecomparison. Evaluation for RACT  Leak thresholds in NESHAP rules (HON) for components in light liquid/gas/vapor services (5,000 ppmv) are lower compared to tho

1173; however for PRDs, the leak threshold in NESHAP (500 ppmv) is higher than in Rule 1173 (200 ppmv).  The frequencies of inspection are about the same for NESHAP and Rule 1173.  Rule 1173 includes many additional requirements (e.g. tamper proof electronic valve monitoring devices and process control instrum

indicators) for preventive maintenance and aiming at reducing the emissions released from PRDs.  Because there are many areas of differences in NESHAP rules (HON) and Rule 1173, it is difficult to compare and assess which rule 

success of any LDAR program does not depend solely on the stringency of the program but remains with the implementation of that 

least as stringent as NESHAP, and is voted the most stringent measure by CAPCOA in 2003 for controlling fugitive leaks. 2) Potential All Feasible Measures, CAPCOA, 9/2003  By comparing Rule 1173 to other District rules in California, such as Bay Area, San Diego, Sacramento, San Joaquin, this report rate

stringent potential all feasible measures for fugitive emissions. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Rule 1173 meets federal RACT requirements. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Appendix 2 38 

Rule 1176 - Sumps and Wastewater Separators (Amended 9/13/96) EQUIPMENT CATEGORY EMISSION LIMIT MONITORING, TESTING Rule 1176 Applicable to wastewater systems and associated control equipment located at petroleum refineries, on-shore oil production fields, off-shore oil production platforms, chemical plants, and industrial facilities • Wastewater systems: ≤ 500 ppmv • Sumps/Wastewater Separators must have 1) floating cover with seals; or 2) fixed cover vented to control device • Sewer lines: totally enclosed • Process drains: with SCAQMD approved water seals • Junction boxes: totally enclosed • Control device must have 1) ≥ 95% control efficiency or 2) ≤500 ppmv leak above background • Inspect for leaks by SCAQMD 

• Frequency of inspection at refi

2) Inaccessible: annually, 3) 

• Frequency of inspection at oth

quarterly, 2) 2. Inaccessible: 

• Methods used in inspections: 1

SCAQMD Grab Sample meth

• For control device, conduct an

Reference Method 25, or SCA

EPA ACT Document – Petroleum Refinery Tier 2 BACT Analysis Report, 1/16/01 • Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) program to reduce fugitive emissions in various NESHAP and NSPS. The requirements in NESHAP, 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart H (HON) are the most stringent. • In HON, threshold for leaks are:  for pumps in light liquid service >10,000 ppmv in Phase I and >5000 ppmv in Phase II and Phase III  for valves in light liquid/gas/vapor service >10,000 ppmv in Phase I and >500 ppmv in Phase II and Phase III  for compressors >500 ppmv  for PRDs >500 ppmv,  for pumps and other components in heavy liquid service, from >500 ppmv to >5,000 ppmv depending on type of components • Inspection frequencies for leak

depending on the type of compnumber of leaking component

• Repair leaking components pr

days depending to the compon

leaks, The first attempt at repa

accomplished no later than 5 d

• Inspection method is EPA Ref

EVALUATION FOR RACT The recent published ACT is applicable to sour water treatment units at refineries. Rule 1176 is more stringent since it contains 

enclosed junction boxes, approved seals for process drains) and contains the same 500 ppmv leak threshold. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Rule 1176 meets federal RACT requirements. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

_______________________________________________________________________________________ 

Appendix 3 39 June 2006

Appendix 3 - RACT Analysis for Group II Rules 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

_______________________________________________________________________________________ 

Appendix 3 40 June 2006

Group II rules are the rules that are approved by the U.S. EPA into SIP. Since these rules 

are approved by CARB and U.S. EPA, they met federal RACT requirements. However, 

because of various reasons, amendments to the rule were made after the approval dates. A 

reevaluation for RACT is needed to assure that the amendments do not result in a relaxation 

of control. If necessary, SCAQMD staff included an analysis to justify that any relaxation, if 

made, would not interfere with the attainment date.

The following 12 rules are in Group II: 

 Rule 461 (CTG/ACT source) 

 Rule 463 (CTG/ACT source) 

 Rule 1107 (CTG/ACT source) 

 Rule 1113 (CTG/ACT source) 

 Rule 1121 (not a CTG/ACT source) 

 Rule 1145 (CTG/ACT source) 

 Rule 1146.2 (CTG/ACT source) 

 Rule 1151 (CTG/ACT source) 

 Rule 1162 (CTG/ACT source) 

 Rule 1166 (not a CTG/ACT source) 

 Rule 1168 (not a CTG/ACT source) 

 Rule 1171(ACT source) 

For each of these rules, SCAQMD staff’s analysis includes: 

1) A summary of the amendments, 

2) A background, if necessary, to provide explanation and basis for the amendments, 

and 

3) An evaluation of impact of the amendments on previous RACT determination 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

_______________________________________________________________________________________ 

Appendix 3 41 June 2006

Rule 461 – Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing (Amended 6/3/05) 

• Summary of Amendments 

Rule 461, amended in June 2005, implements California Health and Safety Code (H&S 

Code) Section 40724 to require best available retrofit control technology for agricultural 

sources by phasing out the exemptions for agricultural operations. Additional 

amendments are to enhance recordkeeping and reporting, to require personnel training 

and improve clarity and enforceability of the rule. An exemption from the Phase II 

requirements is proposed for fueling Tournament of Roses Parade floats. 

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination

The amendments are administrative in nature; therefore they have no impact on previous 

RACT determination. 

Rule 463 – Organic Liquid Storage (Amended 5/6/05) 

• Summary of Amendments 

Rule 463, amended in May 2005, will remove the hydrogen sulfide content standard for 

crude oil and the associated test method which has been shown to be non-reproducible. 

Reliable alternative test methods do not exist and the hydrogen sulfide in crude oil has 

been shown not to off-gas. Other proposed changes are administrative in nature, 

including clarifying language, changes to the definitions, addition of test methods for 

true vapor pressure, reinstatement of language linking the rule and the addendum, and 

addition of rule consistency language to the Test Methods section. 

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination

The amendment is administrative in nature. Since the standard of hydrogen sulfide 

cannot be measured, it was removed. Hydrogen sulfide is also not precursor of ozone. 

Rule 1107 – Coating of Metal Parts and Products (Amended 1/6/06) 

• Summary of Amendments 

The amendments add an exemption for the use of up to ten gallons per year per facility of 

liquid photo resist applied to metal substrates with a thickness of not more than 0.060 

inches. 

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination

The coating necessary for this activity has high VOC content (~ 6.7 lbs/gal). No lowVOC substitute has been identified. However, only a small amount of coating is applied. 

The annual usage at a facility is no more than ten gallons. There are currently six affected 

facilities in the basin, and the average total daily VOC emission for all six facilities is 

estimated to be less than 2 lbs/day. With such a low usage on the market, it is unlikely 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

_______________________________________________________________________________________ 

Appendix 3 42 June 2006

that low-VOC formulation will be developed and therefore, the current technology 

represents RACT for this process. 

Rule 1113 – Architectural Coatings (Amended 7/9/04)

• Summary of Amendments 

The proposed amendment addresses SIP approvability issues identified by the U.S. EPA 

relative to the alternative compliance option of the rule, the Averaging Compliance 

Option. 

• Background 

Rule 1113 was originally adopted in September 1977, and has undergone numerous 

amendments. Rule 1113, amended on November 1996 and approved by EPA, included 

an Averaging Compliance Option (ACO) for flat coating category. Under this ACO, 

manufacturers are allowed to average their emissions over a compliance period not to 

exceed one year provided that they demonstrate their actual emissions from the averaged 

coatings are less than or equal to the emissions that would have been allowed under Rule 

1113. Further amendments to Rule 1113 on May 1999, July 2001, December 2002 and 

December 2003, reduced significantly the allocated VOC limits for many coating 

categories and added numerous other coating categories to the averaging program to 

provide manufacturers additional compliance flexibility. EPA has expressed concerns 

regarding the enforceability and administration of the average program, and the latest 

amendment is a SIP fix to address EPA concerns. 

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination

The amendments significantly reduced VOC limits and contain procedural 

improvements, and therefore have no impact on previous RACT determination. Rule 

1113 is considered the most stringent rule in California by CAPCOA in 2003, and 

represents the above and beyond RACT level.

Rule 1121 – Control of Nitrogen Oxides from Residential Type, Natural 

Gas-Fired Water Heaters (Amended 9/3/04) 

• Summary of Amendments 

Final compliance dates were postponed one to three years depending upon the size and 

type of the water heater in order to provide time for manufacturers to resolve the safety 

(flammable) issue associated with water heaters. Modification to the mitigation fee 

determination was also included. 

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination

This rule addresses residential applications only and there is no relaxation on the 

emission standards, just a delay in the compliance date. There is no CTG/ACT for 

residential water heaters. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

_______________________________________________________________________________________ 

Appendix 3 43 June 2006

Rule 1145 – Plastic, Rubber, Leather and Glass Coatings (Amended 

12/3/04) 

• Summary of Amendments 

The amendments set more stringent VOC limits and future compliance dates for several 

coating categories. The proposed amendments also establish new VOC limits for leather 

and extreme performance coatings, set the High Volume Low Pressure gun efficiency as 

the baseline for determining equivalent transfer efficiency, and add a limited exemption 

for polyurethane shoe sole coating. This proposed amendment partially implements 

2003 AQMP Control Measure CTS-10 and achieves an emission reduction of 

approximately 1.2 tons per day at an average cost-effectiveness of $4,026 per ton of 

VOC reduced. 

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination

There is no relaxation on the emission standards. 

Rule 1146.2 – Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Large Water Heaters 

and Small Boilers (Amended 1/7/05) 

• Summary of Amendments 

Rule 1146.2 was adopted in January 1998 to establish NOx emission limits for boilers 

and water heaters from 75,000 to 2 million Btu/hr. Because retrofit low NOx burners are 

only available for a limited number of boilers and water heaters, the compliance dates 

were extended to the end of a 15-year life for this category of boiler/heater. 

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination

Rule 1146.2 is included in the Settlement Agreement for the 1999 AQMP amendment. 

The emission reductions foregone are expected to occur eventually in 2014, and in 

addition, the 2003 AQMP includes a three tons set aside to account for the delay in 

technology implementation, and a portion of that will be used to offset the reductions 

forgone in this rule. The amendments of R1146.2 will not impact the attainment date. In 

addition, Rule 1146.2 was amended again in May 2006 to strengthen the limits. These 

sources are under RECLAIM, which is considered BARCT, above and beyond RACT 

(71 FR 28290). 

Rule 1151 – Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Non-Assembly Line 

Coating Operations (Amended 12/2/05) 

• Summary of Amendments 

The amendments further reduce VOC limits in accordance with the California Air 

Resources Board 2005 Automotive Coatings Suggested Control Measure. The 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

_______________________________________________________________________________________ 

Appendix 3 44 June 2006

amendments implement in part Control Measure CTS-10 - Miscellaneous Industrial 

Coatings and Solvent Operations which is part of the 2003 AQMP. 

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination

CTG was developed in 1977, and the amendments have no impact on previous RACT 

determination, therefore staff considered that it meets RACT. 

Rule 1162 – Polyester Resin Operations (Amended 7/8/05) 

• Summary of Amendments 

Rule 1162, amended in July 2005, removed the requirement of applying gel coats solely 

with nonatomizing spray application techniques, established a list of acceptable low 

emitting spray application techniques for gel coat, clarified the use of hand-held spray 

equipment for gel coat touch-up and repair, and added an exemption for application 

under 1 gallon per day. 

• Background 

Past amendments to Rule 1162 sought to reduce VOC emissions by limiting the 

allowable VOC content of resins and gel coats, and requiring the use of nonatomizing 

spray application. A test program conducted by the industry and the district shows that 

nonatomizing spray application is not technically effective, and results in an inferior 

product. Therefore, in July 2005, the requirement restricting the application of gel coats 

to nonatomizing spray application is removed, and a list of acceptable low emitting spray 

application techniques for gel coat, including air-assisted airless spray, HVLP, and 

electrostatic attraction is added. 

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination

The past amendments of Rule 1162 were to implement Control Measures CTS-08 of the 

1997 AQMP and the 1999 amended AQMP. By removing the requirement related to the 

use of nonatomizing spray application techniques, the July 2005 amendments result in 

foregone VOC emission reductions of 0.45 tons per day. However, other rulemaking 

actions up to July 2005 (i.e., Rule 1122 and Rule 1162 in 2001) have resulted in a total 

reduction exceeding the SIP commitment of 3 tpd in the 1997/1999 SIP for CTS-08, 

which would easily offset the 0.4 tpd from Rule 1162. The CTG for this category was 

published in 1983, and there is no recently developed CTG, therefore staff considered 

that the standards in Rule 1162 meet RACT. This rule is considered the most stringent 

control in California by CAPCOA in 2003. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

_______________________________________________________________________________________ 

Appendix 3 45 June 2006

Rule 1166 – Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Decontamination 

of Soil (Amended 5/11/01) 

• Summary of Amendments 

The proposed amendments will improve enforceability of Rule 1166 by requiring 1) that 

contaminated soil stockpiles be sprayed with a vapor suppressant and covered with 

plastic sheeting; 2) a daily inspection of the covered stockpile; and 3) that records are 

kept of chain of custody between generator, transporter, storage and treatment facilities. 

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination

The amendments have no impact on previous RACT determination. There is no 

CTG/ACT for this source category. This rule is considered as most stringent by 

CAPCOA in 2003, therefore staff considered this rule is RACT. 

Rule 1168 – Adhesive and Sealant Applications (Amended 1/7/05) 

• Summary of Amendments 

The amendments maintain the current VOC limits for PVC and CPVC welding, reduce 

the VOC limit for primers used in conjunction with PVC and CPVC welding, reduce the 

VOC limit for ABS cements, postpone the final limit for top and trim adhesives until 

January 1, 2007, and allow limited use of methylene chloride in adhesive formulations. 

The amendments are to resolve 1) performance and application concerns with water and 

acetone-based adhesives, 2) difficulties in substituting exempt compounds for VOC 

solvents, 3) obtaining other regulatory agency and product approval requirements. 

 

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination

The rule is to implement SCAQMD Control Measure CTS-02E in the 1997 AQMP, as 

amended in 1999, which calls for greater use of low-VOC, high-solids, or multicomponent adhesives to achieve 1.3 tpd reductions overall. The amendment of Rule 

1168 in 2000 achieved reductions of 8.0 tpd for 2010. Several amendments in 2002, 

2003, and 2005 cause a 1.8 tpd emission reduction foregone. The remaining 6.2 tpd 

reductions however are well in excess of the required 1.3 tpd reductions required from 

CM CTS-02E in the 1997 AQMP, as amended in 1999. There is no CTG/ACT for this 

source category, and this rule was considered containing the most stringent limits by 

CAPCOA in 2003, therefore staff considered that it represents RACT. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

_______________________________________________________________________________________ 

Appendix 3 46 June 2006

Rule 1171 – Solvent Cleaning Operations (Amended 5/6/05) 

• Summary of Amendments 

The amendments implement the recommendations from a technology assessment of lowVOC cleaning materials. Compliance date was delayed one year for the cleaning of ink 

application equipment used for lithographic/letterpress printing, screen printing and 

ultraviolet/electron beam inks. Additional time is necessary to fully assess the impact of 

promising new formulations on print quality, equipment life and costs. SCAQMD staff 

proposes to extend and add limited exemptions for certain specialized cleaning 

categories. 

• Evaluation of Impact on Previous RACT Determination

Rule 1171 implemented a control measure from the 1997 AQMP (CM#97ADV-CLNG) 

to meet state and federal requirements. The proposed changes to Rule 1171 delays part 

of the 2005 VOC emission reductions expected from the 1999 rule amendment; however, 

it would not affect the overall attainment strategy. There is no CTG for this source 

category, and this rule was considered containing the most stringent limits by CAPCOA 

in 2003, therefore staff considered this rule represents RACT. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 4 47 June 2006

Appendix 4 - RACT Analysis for Group III Rules 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 4 48 June 2006

Group III rules are the NOx or VOC rules that have not yet been approved by the U.S. 

EPA into SIP. SCAQMD staff reviewed these rules to ensure that the rules meet federal 

RACT requirements. 

The following 6 rules are in Group III. Staff added footnotes to make clarifications as 

recommended by EPA Region IX. 

 Rule 462 (CTG/ACT source) 34

 Rule 1109 (CTG/ACT source) 35 

 Rule 1110.2 (CTG/ACT source) 36 

 Rule 1118 (not a CTG/ACT source) 37

 

 Rule 1133.2 (not a CTG/ACT source) 38

 Rule 1163 (not a CTG/ACT source) 

For each of these rules, SCAQMD staff’s analysis includes: 

1) A summary of the requirements in the rule, specifically the emissions limits, 

monitoring, testing and record keeping requirements, and the work practices; 

2) A summary of the emission standards, and if available, the work practices, 

monitoring, testing and record keeping recommended in the CTG/ATC; 

3) An evaluation for RACT, which is a comparison between the rule requirements 

with the recommended standards in the CTG/ATC; 

4) SCAQMD staff’s conclusion or recommendation. 

 

34 Rule 462 was SIP-approved on 7/21/99 (64 FR 9037). EPA web site will be updated accordingly. 

35 Rule 1109 was withdrawn from SIP processing action on 5/23/00 (65 FR 33259) since all affected 

sources subject to this rule are now under RECLAIM.

36 Staff has not yet submitted the latest amendments of Rule 1110.2, dated June 3, 2005, to EPA for SIP 

approval because staff will amend the rule again in late 2006 to improve the sections related to source 

testing and monitoring. 

37 Staff will follow up on the submittal of this rule to EPA for review and SIP approval. 

38 Rule 1133.2 was SIP-approved on 7/21/04 (69 FR 43518). EPA web site will be updated accordingly. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 4 49 June 2006
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozon

Appendix 4 50 Rule 462 – Organic Liquid Loading (Amended 5/14/99)

EQUIPMENT 

CATEGORY

EMISSION LIMIT 

Rule 462 Applicable to: Class A facilities having loading rates of 20,000 gals/day or more of organic liquid with vapor pressure of 1.5 psia or greater Class B facilities having loading rates from 4,000 gals/day to 20,000 gals/day of gasoline Class C facilities having loading rates of less than 4,000 gals/day and not more than 500,000 gals/yr of gasoline 

Class A Facilities • CARB certified vapor recovery system or SCAQMD approved vapor recovery system if not require 

CARB certification pursuant to H&S Code 41954 

• Comply with a standard of 0.08 lbs VOC per 1000 gal transferred or less 

• Bottom loading 

• No overfills or leaks 

• Vapor recovery system’s backpressure must be less than 18 in water 

Class B Facilities • CARB certified vapor recovery system or SCAQMD approved vapor recovery system if not require 

CARB certification pursuant to H&S Code 41954 

• 90% efficiency for vapor recovery 

• Bottom loading 

• No overfills or leaks 

• Vapor recovery system’s backpressure must be less than 18 in water 

Class C Facilities • Bottom loading or submerged loading 

• No overfills or leaks 

• • • 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozon

Appendix 4 51 Rule 462 (Continued) 

EQUIPMENT 

CATEGORY

EMISSION LIMIT 

Yolo-Solano AQMD Rule 2.21, Amended 9/14/05 Applicable to any gasoline bulk plant, any terminal, or any transport vessel that stores and transfers organic liquid with a TVP of 0.5 psia or greater. 

Terminal Loading (Section 308) • CARB certified vapor recovery system or AQMD approved vapor recovery system if not require 

CARB certification pursuant to H&S Code 41954 

• Comply with a standard of 0.08 lbs VOC per 1000 gal transferred or less 

• Bottom loading 

• No overfills or leaks 

Gasoline Bulk Loading (Section 309) • CARB certified vapor recovery system or AQMD approved vapor recovery system if not require 

CARB certification pursuant to H&S Code 41954 

• 95% efficiency for vapor recovery 

• Bottom loading 

• No overfills or leaks 

• • • 

EPA CTG --- Control of Volatile Organic Emissions From Bulk Gasoline Plants, EPA-450/2-77-035, 12/77 

• Submerged loading (either top loading or bottom loading), or 

• Submerged loading and vapor balance with 90% control efficiency 

EPA --- Beyond VOC RACT CTG Requirements, EPA453/R-95-010, 4/95 

South Coast rule is considered as providing quantifiable “additional” reduction relative to federal CTG 

as shown in Table 1-1, Section 4.3, and Section 4.4 of the report. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozon

Appendix 4 52 Rule 462 (Continued) EVALUATION FOR RACT History of Rule 462 Rule 462 was amended several times. Prior to the last 1999 amendments, Rule 462 was amended on 6/9/95 to implement Control Mea

1994 AQMP, which was adopted to comply with the California and Federal CAA. The 1995 amendments reduced the VOC emission l

pound per 1,000 gallons of organic liquid transferred in Class A facilities as required under 40 CFR, Part 63, Subpart R --- National Em

Gasoline Distribution Facilities. This amendment also included rule language clarification to enhance the rule’s enforceability The 1995 version of the rule was submitted to CARB and EPA for review and inclusion into SIP. EPA provided a limited approval/dis

which was effective on 12/15/97, and required the District to correct the definition of “Facility Vapor Leak” that allowed measurement 

distance of two centimeters from the source, since this two-centimeter distance is inconsistent with EPA Test Method 21, which requireleak at the surface of the source or within one centimeter from the surface of moving parts (62 FR 26460). Because of this reason, the D

Rule 462 in 1999 to address EPA’s disapproval issue. The 1999 amendments also included several administrative changes identified b

facilities. As a result, EPA has not imposed any emission offset sanctions, or any Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) due to the limited 

in 1995. CAPCOA 2003 Potential All Feasible Measures & Yolo-Solano AQMD Rule 2.21 In September 2003, the CAPCOA rules subcommittee has determined that Yolo-Solano AQMD Rule 2.21, amended on 6/12/02, was th

Potential All Feasible Control Measures for organic liquid storage and transfer. Yolo-Solano Rule 2.21 was recently revised in 9/14/05comparison between the Yolo-Solano Rule 2.21 and South Coast Rule 461 is provided above. Yolo-Solano Rule 2.21 also includes reqtanks of capacity of more than 250 gals which is not stated in the table above since these requirements should be compared to South Co

With respect to Class A facilities, the requirements in South Coast Rule 461 are as stringent as the requirements in Yolo-Solano Rule 2facilities with loading rates less than 20,000 gal/day, Yolo-Solano Rule 2.21 requires 95% control efficiency for vapor recovery system only requires 90% control efficiency for Class B facilities and does not specify any requirements for vapor recovery in Class C facilitie

However, Yolo-Solano Rule 2.21 does not include stringent requirements for storage tanks as South Coast Rule 1178. In South Coast R

required for all external floating roof tanks with TVP of 3psia or more at “major” facilities with annual emissions of greater than 20 ton

Coast Rule 1178 is voted as the most stringent control measure for storage tanks by CAPCOA in 2003. Federal RACT Requirements Rule 462, amended in 1999, has more stringent requirements than those stated in federal CTG a

documents listed above. 

CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Rule 462, amended in 1999, meets federal RACT requirements and is considered above and beyond RACT by EPA. Even though it mYolo-Solano Rule 2.21 with respect to the efficiency requirement for vapor recovery system for Class C facilities, when cons

requirements for storage tanks in South Coast Rule 1178, they together met the air quality goals of the AQMP 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozon

Appendix 4 53 Rule 1109 – Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Boilers and Process Heaters in Petroleum (Amended 8/5/88) EVALUATION FOR RACT Rule 1109 was withdrawn from SIP processing action on 5/23/2000 (65 FR 33259) after CARB informed EPA that all boilers and heate1109 located at refineries are subject to RECLAIM rules. EPA is proposing to approve Regulation XX into SIP (Citation 71 FR 28290CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Rule 1109, or RECLAIM, meets federal RACT requirements. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozon

Appendix 4 54 Rule 1110.2 – Emissions from Gaseous and Liquid-Fueled Engines (Amended 6/3/05) 

EQUIPMENT CATEGORY EMISSION LIMIT 

Rule 1110.2 Applicable to: 1) All stationary and portable engines over 50 bop 

2) For engines that are used for electric power 

generation; or fired landfill gas, sewage digester gas, oil field-produced gas, or LPG; or used to drive 

a water supply or conveyance pump except for aeration facilities; or used for integral engine compressor application operating less than 4000 hours per year 

3) For portable engines 

1) For all stationary and portable Ices: 

• NOx = 36 ppmv, corrected to 15% oxygen on a dry basis , and 

averaged over 15 minutes 

• VOC = 250 ppmv, measured as carbon, corrected to 15% oxygen o

dry basis , and averaged over 15 minutes 

• CO = 2000 ppmv, corrected to 15% oxygen on a dry basis , and 

averaged over 15 minutes 

2) For this group of engines: 

Concentration Limit = Reference Limit x Efficiency/25%, where Refere

Limits are: • For engines 500 bop or greater : NOx = 36 ppmv, VOC = 250 ppmv

• For engines from 50 bop – 500 bop: NOx = 45 ppmv, VOC = 250 p

3) For portable spark-ignition engines: 

• NOx = 80 ppmv (1.5 g/bhp-hr) 

• VOC = 240 ppmv (1.5 g/bhp-hr) 

• CO = 176 ppmv 

For portable compression-ignition engines: • Depending on the engine size, the limit for NOx ranging from 535 

ppmv (7 g/bhp-hr) to 770 ppmv (10 g/bhp-hr); or turbocharged and degree injection retard, or turbocharged with aftercooler/intercooleand 4 degree injection timing retard. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozon

Appendix 4 55 Rule 1110.2 Continued) 

EQUIPMENT CATEGORY EMISSION LIMIT 

EPA ACT Document – NOx Emissions from Stationary Inter Combustion Engines, EPA453/R-93-032, 7/93 

For rich burn, spark ignition engines, natural gas fueled, NOx ranging from: • 640 – 940 ppmv with A/F adjustment at 10-40% efficiency 

• 640 – 1060 ppmv with ignition timing retard at 0-40% efficiency 

• 640 – 940 ppmv with A/F adjustment & ignition timing retard 

• 135 ppmv with prestratified charged (PSC) at 10-40% efficiency 

• 20 – 110 ppmv with NSCR at 90-98% efficiency 

• 135 ppmv with Low-Emission Combustion (LEC) at 87% efficiency 

For lean burn, spark ignition engines, natural gas fueled, NOx ranging from: • 860 – 1,170 ppmv with A/F adjustment at 5-30% efficiency 

• 980 – 1260 ppmv with ignition timing retard at 0-20% efficiency 

• 740 – 980 ppmv with A/F adjustment & ignition timing retard at 20-40% efficiency 

• 125 ppmv with SCR at 90% efficiency 

• 150 ppmv with Low-Emission Combustion (LEC) at 87% efficiency 

For diesel fueled and duel-fueled engines, NOx ranging from: 

• 430 – 700 ppmv with ignition timing retard at 20-30% efficiency 

• 90 – 125 ppmv with SCR at 80-90% efficiency 

• 150 ppmv with Low-Emission Combustion (LEC) at 75% efficiency 

EPA ACT Document – Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines, Updated Information on NOx Emissions and Control Techniques, EPA Contract No. 68-D98-026, 9/1/00 

This document is supplemental to the 1993 ACT document, and the focus of this report is in the 

natural gas transmission and storage industry because this is a large segment of stationary ICEs. I

addition, this report focuses on Low Emission Combustion (LEC) control technology and costs. 

• Majority (97%) of the engines tested (460 tests total) was at 2 g/bhp-hr (or 150 ppmv for lean 

burn engines39) or below 

• All of new engines equipped with LEC: 1 – 2 g/bhp-hr (75 - 150 ppmv) 

• Retrofitted engines with LEC: 2 g/bhp 

39 Using a conversion factor provided in the report for lean-burn engines controlled with LEC: 75 ppmv = 1g/bhp
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozon

Appendix 4 56 Rule 1110.2 (Continued) EVALUATION FOR RACT Note that all engines subject to this rule located at RECLAIM facilities will be subject to RECLAIM rules, which is approved into SIP federal RACT. The engines that are not subject to RECLAIM will be subject to Rule 1110.2. Rule 1110.2 limits are beyond RACT levels because of the following reasons:  Rule 1110.2 emission limit for engines is generally 36 ppmv, which is within the lowest limit cited in the ACT. The ACT cited tha

could be achieved with NSCR (or also referred to as three-way catalyst). However, the ACT also indicated that most NSCR is apponly and as a result, the CO and VOC emissions are typically higher compared to other control options. In addition, the ACT indic

experience of NSCR application with fuels (e.g. sewage digester gas, landfill gas, and gases containing H2S) other than natural gas

 For a specific group of engines (e.g. electric power generation), Rule 1110.2 limit is generally in a range of 115 ppmv – 144 ppmv4

which is in the lowest limit that can be achieved for engines with retrofitted LEC, according to the information in the ACT.  For portable engines, Rule 1110.2 requires 80 ppmv, which is lower than all of the limits for rich burn and lean burn natural gas en

limits that can be achieved with SCR for diesel and dual-fueled cited in the ACT.  For portable compression ignition engines41, Rule 1110.2 has a range of limits from 535 – 770 ppmv, which is in the upper range c

dual-fueled engines. The ACT indicated that the lowest limits that can be achieved for diesel and dual-fueled engines equipped wi

However the ACT also indicated that 1) there were limited applications for SCR. There were only 9 SCR installations with diesel fueled engines in the United States; and 2) there was a little experience with SCR application for a variable load engine due to amm

limitations. In addition, in the updated 2000 version, the ACT indicated that LEC can achieve a level of 1 g/bhp-hr – 2 g/bhp-hr (7indicated that 1) there was no LEC design for diesel compression engines, and 2) there were limited LEC applications for a limited 

CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Rule 1110.2, or RECLAIM, meets federal RACT requirements as explained above.40 Assuming 80% efficiency, 36 ppmv x 80/25 = 115 ppmv or 45 ppmv x 80/25 = 144 ppmv 41 Compression ignition engines are liquid-fueled or diesel engines
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozon

Appendix 4 57 Rule 1118 – Control of Emissions from Refinery Flares (Amended 11/4/05) 

EMISSION LIMIT MONITORING, TESTING AND 

Rule 1118 Applicable to all flares used at petroleum refineries, sulfur recovery plants and hydrogen production plants 

• Primary objective is to minimize flaring and thus reduce all 

criteria pollutants 

• Flares must be operated in a smokeless manner 

• No specific limits for NOx, VOC, PM and CO 

• Performance target for SO2: Gradually decrease to less than 

0.5 tons per million barrels of crude processing capacity by 2012. 

• Hydrogen sulfide limit is 160 ppmv, averaged over 3 hours 

• Submit a flare minimization plan 

performance target for SO2 

• Submit a flare monitoring and re

• Continuously video monitor ima

• Continuous analyzers for vent ga

concentration 

• Daily sampling for flare events 

• Pay mitigation fee if do not meet 

for SO2 

EVALUATION FOR RACT EPA has no CTG/ATC for flares. In the CAPCOA 2003 Potential All Feasible Measures, CAPCOA cited the following flare rules:  Bay Area, Rule 12-11, Flare Monitoring at Petroleum Refineries, Adopted 6/4/03  San Joaquin Valley, Rule 4311, Flares, Adopted 6/20/02  San Luis Obispo County, Rule 426, Landfill Gas Emissions, Adopted 7/26/95  Ventura County, Rule 74.17.1, Municipal Solid Waste Landfills, Amended 2/9/99 

The San Luis Obispo, and Ventura County rules contain NOx limit (0.06 lbs per million BTU) and CO limit (0.20 lbs per million BT

The San Joaquin Valley rule contains NOx limits (from 0.068 to 0.52 lb per million BTU) and VOC limit (from 0.0013 to 0.14 lb per 

these rules are for ground-level enclosed flares. According to the staff report of Rule 1118, only 1 out of 27 flares subject to Rule 111

the remaining 26 are elevated flares. The staff report of Rule 1118 indicated that for elevated flare, post-combustion techniques (e.g

burner) are not practical. The most practical control options are 1) flare minimization and 2) use of recovery system. In this aspect, Rthe Bay Area rule. In addition, the staff report of Rule 1118 indicated that this approach is consistent with EPA’s approach in the 1998 

Petroleum Refinery Initiative”. Because of these reasons, even though Rule 1118 does not contain specific standards for NOx and VOC

through work practices. 

CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Rule 1118 sets RACT requirements for NOx and VOC through good engineering practices (e.g. implementing flare minimization, recordkeeping plan. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozon

Appendix 4 58 Rule 1133.2 – Emission Reductions from Co-Composting Operations (Adopted 1/10/03) 

EMISSION LIMIT M

A

Rule 1133.2 Applicable to all cocomposting operations 

• Performance standards:  Enclosed storage area for active co-composting,  Conduct curing using an aeration system that operates under negative pressure  Vent the exhaust to APC having 80% control efficiency or greater 

• Existing operations must reduce up to 70% baseline VOC and ammonia emissions. Baseline 

emission factors are 1.78 lbs of VOC per ton throughput and 2.93 lbs of ammonia per ton throughput. 

• 

EVALUATION FOR RACT EPA has no CTG/ATC for co-composting operations. The 70% - 80% reduction of VOC represents typical control efficiency in biofiltCONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Rule 1133.2 sets RACT requirements for co-composting operations. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozon

Appendix 4 59 Rule 1163 – Control of Vinyl Chloride Emissions (Amended 6/7/85) EVALUATION FOR RACT EPA has no CTG/ACT for this source and the provisions of this rule apply in addition to the provisions of Regulation X, Subpart F, wh

Emission Standard for Vinyl Chloride, adopted by without change to the District Regulation X. The federal NSPS should be considere

category. 

CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Rule 1163 is beyond the levels required by federal RACT. 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 60 June 2006

Appendix 5 - Major Source Facilities 
Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 61 June 2006

Table 5-1: List of Title V Facilities 

	
 
 
	






 	
 



 	
 



 
		
	
 



 
		
	
 



 	 



 				 	


 



 	 !"	 	! 



 	

#
 



 	!! !
!!#
 



 				 	!
 



 	! 



 	$	
	 % 



 	$	
"	


 



 	$	
$!	$!
! 



 		
 



 		
 



 	

!
 



 		&		

 



 	!!
 



 	!		!# 



 	!&


 	&# 



 	!		
 



 	!$
$ 	&# 



 	
$!! 



 	!! 



 		%'		 !
 



 	"(	
!
) 



 	$*!	!#
 



 		

 



 		

# 



 		

# 



 	*!	$
	#
) 



 	
!
$!
 



 		
	
!
+!!, 



 		
	
-

 



 		
!$!
 



 	& 



 	
 


Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 62 June 2006

	
 
 
	






 	
	 	 	!
 



 	
$!


 



 	
!	'!#	!" 



 	
!!	
		
	&
 



 	
&!' !&
)#+	 , 



 	
&
#
) 



 	
&
#
)'
	 



 	# 



 		!!

	
	 



 	$	
!

!
) 



 	$
&
!!	 



 		$	&	 



 	&	$"
 



 	
	$&!!!
$	! 



 	
#		!
!$ 



 	!
$
$!!
 



 	!
$
$!!
'
	 



 	&	$
	$	 



 		!!
 



 	!&	$! 



 	!&	$! 



 	"
!
 "	
 



 		

	!&
 



 		$	
$!! 



 		$	
$!!#
 



 		
!&!
 



  
	

 



  	
$	#
 



 	"$!
 



 		 	
	
) 



 		 	
	
)'
	 



 	
	
	
#&	! 	 



 	&
*
 



 	&
*
'
	 



 	!	
	
 



 	& 	$!!
# 	& 



 	
	
#
 



 

!
 



 '	&!# '
$$ 	 



 '
$!!# '	&!$ 	 



 !$! 	"
 



 &!	 


Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 63 June 2006

	
 
 
	






 	!!!
	
	(!		!!! 



   	"!!	
 



 	
! 



 ""+!!, 



 	"&!
	 



 	"&	"
#
 



 	"&	"	
	
#
) 



 
!	
!
 



 
!	
!
 



 $
	
#
) 



  

 



 ! 
$!!#
 



 ! 
$!!#
'
	 



 
$

'
	 



 
$
#
) 



 
		"&&!& 



 $!

 



 $
		!	
	
 



  	
"#  	
"	 



 	 
#
)#		!!*! 	"#$ 	 



 	
!& 



 	
!&#

&
 



 	
	
$!	$! 



 	
	
!	!	
!&
! !
 



 	
	
!	!	
!&
! !
'
	 



 	
	!
! 



 	
	!		

'
	 



 	
	!
$!!
 



 	
	!
$!!
'
	 



 	

# 



 	 	
	
 



 	
"! 



 	!

	
	
 



 	!		)#
 



 	!		$!# 



 	!		$!#'
	 



 		
		&!
 



 $	!'!
	$	 



 
	!$!#
	  



 
	!!
 



 
	
$!
&	& 



 
	
$!
&	&'
	 


Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 64 June 2006

	
 
 
	






 $
	

 



 $
	

 



 $
	

'
	 



 &	
#&	&! 



 	
	&
  

!	
 



 &$	
 



 !$ !$ 



 !! $!
#
 



 
$ 	
 



 	!	! 



 	
!! 



 	&!
 



 	&! 



  	
 



  			
	
 



  	!&	!	 
 



 !
	 



 
	&	

	! 



 	
!		

#
) 



 !!! 



 
!&

) 



 
&!


	'! 



 
&!
	
	
"	 



 
!$	$$
$


 



 
!$	$
$!!# 



 
!$	$
$!'
	 



 
	
!
 



 
	
	
!#$ 



 

 



 !	

#
 



 
		#
'
	 



 
		#
'
	 



 $
	
!&

 



 $
	
!&

 



 	!	

 



 	$	!# 	!	
!#
) 



 

	
	
	#
 



 !	

 



 
	
) 



 
"!	
 



 
"!	
'
	 



 

! 


Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 65 June 2006

	
 
 
	






 !
	!
 



 ! 	!!
!&	$ 



 !	 



 !	'
	 



 

$		!
 



 

$		!
 



 $	
!	#	$	$
!	 



 $	

#$	
!!&!$ 	 



 $	
	
	
	 



 $	! 



 $
 



 $	$ &! 



 $%	 	! 



 $%	"	! 



 $(
	
 



 $!	&!#
 



 $!	&!#
'
	 



 $!
	
$! 



 $
	

 



 $.	 $!
 



 $
	&

 



 $
	&

'
	 



 $ $
!
 



 $	!$!$!
 



 $
	!!
 



 $
	
 !
 



 $

'$	$! 



 $
$!!
 



 )))

	&



 



 
#	$	
&	$
 



 	!!	
! 



 	!

		$! 



 	!
!!
 



 
# 



 !
$# 



 

$!
#	!	 



 
"	
	 



 -

)##!&$)! 



 %
! 



 	 '#$	!	!!	 !
 



 	&$	!
!!& 		
! 



 	&$&$
#	&$	!
 


Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 66 June 2006

	
 
 
	






 	$
	
 



 	
	#	$		!
 



 	
$!#
 



 
$!	
!
!) 



  
!$$$!# 



  



 $&!	
 



 $&!	
 



 $		!	
/ 



 

"
&		 



 		 	! 



 
	
		!
 



 
	!&
!
$ 



 $")	
$!
!
!
 



 	"	


	
	#
) 



 	$!
! 



 
$ 	"
 



 
$ 	"
'
	 



 $	
 	
#&
$ 



 '	
&		#
) 



 !! 



 
	$
!
 



 
	$
!
'
	 



  

		#$ 		!	! 



 	
	!
 



 	
	!
'
	 



 	

 !
!!! 



 	!!!! 



 	$!"!"$! 



 

!! 



 

!!'		

) 



 
	
 



 
		
	
!	

	% 



 
		%	
$ 



 	'	 



 	'	'
	 



 	$	$ 



 


 



 	
&	
$!
 



 
$	# !$ 



 
 &
!
 



 $
!&! 


Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 67 June 2006

	
 
 
	






 $!&$ 	!!#
#	
/ 



 $!&$ 	!!#
#	
/'
	 



 '! 



 	&	"	
	
 



 	&!!
 



 	&!!'
	 



 	&	!
#$
&	$
& 



 
$!!
 



  ! 



  !!
 



  !!
'
	 



 !	
!
 



 !	
!
'
	 



 	$	

$!!) 



 $	

 



 &&
(# 



 &		"! 



 &	
$ 
!$ 			
  



 &	 
	
 



 &	 " $!
 



 &	!(

	
		
 



 &
! " 



 &	 
!!
 



 &	
 



 &


	
	
 



 &


	
	
'
	 



 &$
 



 &$
'
	 



 &!	"	
#
 



 &!	"	
#
'
	 



 &	!
! 



 &&		"
!	"	
'!
) 



 &


	&!	 



 ))
! 

 



 	%% 



 !!
	
!
 



 !!!	
 



 !!!	
'
	 



 
$	%!
 



 
$	%!
'
	 



 
$!	
	
!!'	 



 
$!	
!&

 


Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 68 June 2006

	
 
 
	






 
	
$!	
'&
 



 
	
$&#
 



 
	
$&#
'
	 



 

	
 	!!$! 



 
!
$	
 



 

	
	%!
 



 

	
		 



 

	
	&%		 



 
!	 	
$! 



 
!

!!
#	!
 



 ! 



 		 



 
$!!#	


 



 & 



 ) ))
 



 	"!
$
#'	&	# 



 	((& 	& 



 	((& 	&
 



 		
!&
 



  #
) 



 
!

$!!
) 



 
!
	! 



 &	
!
$!
 



 &
 $$!
! 



 &
 $$!
!'
	 



 &
&)	
	

 



 &
!
	
	
	

 



 
	&	
!
 



 !

#

& 



 ""

 



 ")) 	!!#
) 



 "	!	
& 



 "	!	
&'
	 



 "	!
$	
&!	 



 "	'	$	
#
 



 "	
!
 



 " '	"$$
)'
 



 " '	"$$
)'
'
	 



 "
	$$"
#$ 	$	
$ 



 "

 



 "



 



 ""&  


Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 69 June 2006

	
 
 
	






 "!	"	&
 



 "!&$ 



 "			 



 !!&! 



 )	)!	!#
'
	 



 	
!	
	
$!! 



 	#$	
	! 



 	#$	 



 	#$&	 
	
!	
 



 	#$&	
!
	
!	
 



 	#$!	$
	
!
 



 	#$	
	
!	
 



 	&	 '	$	
 



 	&	&!#"

$$	 



 	)#

	!$ 



 	)#	
	
!	& 



 	)#
	$	
 



 	)#	
&!	!$	
 



 	)#!&$ 



 	$
"!
 



 	&	 	&&!& 



 	

 



 	!	$) 



 	
!$	
 



 	! 	&	
) 



 	! 	&	
)'
	 



 	!
	$
	"	
 



 	% 



 	&
* 



  



 !&	&
 



 !&	&
'
	 



 &	!
 



 
$!!
 



 !
 "	

	 



 &	&%
 



 &	&%
 



 	
$	
 



 
 	&#! 



 
 	&
	
 



 
 	&	$	
 



  
$!!	
	 


Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 70 June 2006

	
 
 
	






 !	
!$!	 



 !	
!!
	
! 



 !	
!!
	
! 



 !	
!!
	
! 



 "!!
#/ 



 )) 



 ))'
	 



 !

 



 		&'
	 



 		&'
	 



 	$!
'	&		&!
 



 	
	#!	 



 	
'
$#

&	)$ 	 



 	
'
$#

&	)$ 	'
	 



 	
!$ 
$! 



 		!

 



 	"
$$!'
	 



 	"
$$!'
	 



 	!"'
 



 	!"'	
#
 



 	&	!$

!&

 



 

	 
!
 



 $	)) 



 

	 
!
 



 $!
 



 

!!#$ 



 
(!		
#
) 



 	!!
 



 		!	
	 



 	
	
 



 $	&
!
 



 $	&
!#
) 



 &! 



 	!#
 



 $!	 %
 



 "&	$		
 



  
 



 $	 



 $&&$
!#
) 



 $&
 



 
 



 
	&&
 


Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 71 June 2006

	
 
 
	






 
	&&
'
	 



 
 



 
	
	
 



 !
	
#$	 



 !
	
#	$ 



 
	!	!
	  



 
	
 



 
$!
 



 
!

			
 



 
	
	!	)$$)$) 



 
 	!! 



 

#
) 



 
	
	! 



 


) 



 
$	
 



 
"

# 



 
$
! 



 
&	
#		$ 



 
&	
#		$ 



 
&	
#		$'
	 



 
&	
!	!!
!!!'
	 



 
&!
!&	!% 



 


 



 


'
	 



 
		
 



 	"$
!#
 



  &	$!!! 



  &	$!!!'
	 



 &
 



 $
"
 



 $
"
'
	 



 !
'&
 



 	

#$#  



 	

#$#
$	 



 	

#$#	 



 	

#$#!	
	 



 
!

 



 
!' "		!!
	

 



 ) ) 	!!$)
 



 ) )	!
! 



 	  $$!#	 	#$ 	 



 		$!
 


Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 72 June 2006

	
 
 
	






 	!		 



 	!&
 



 	 



 		"$)
 



 	"	 	 



 	"	 	'
	 



 	"
!

!!
 



 	!	$
	 



 	!	$
	#$+!!, 



 	
	#	$
	
#
 



 	
	!	!#
	

	$ 



 	
$!! 



 &
	!	
 



 $

! 



 
	
	! 



 	
!!
# 	!! 



 	$	 



 $! 



 	$!
 



 
	!!&!
 



 	!$!!' 



 	!$$$!#
 



 	!!!	& 



 	
$	
 



 	"		
 



 	$	
	!
 



 
		&!+!!, 



 	%	
 



 	%	
 



 !
	

 



 !
!		!
+!, 



 !
!		!
'
	 



 
$!!
)#
!	 



 $
	!!#
 



 !! 



 $$!
 



 !!! 	

 



 !!
	
!&
	
(	
 



 !!
 



 !!!&! 



 $
!!&$ 



 -		 	
#
 


Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 73 June 2006

	
 
 
	






 - $'!
! 



 - $'!
!'
	 



 - $	!
 !&
 



 - $

	$ 



 -
	#%	$ 



 -
 



 ))$

!
!#	$ 



 ))$

!
!#	$'
	 



 	$	"
$!!
 



 		
!	!
 



 	$!
 



 	!!$!
!
 



 

 



 
&$
$!!
 



 	

	
$	#
) 



  !!	
	 



 !
	 



 %	#%	 		
	
 



 %	#%	 		
	
'
	 



 
!



 



 
!!
 



 &$	
) 



 
"		!&$
$ 



 

	
#
) 



 !
"
 



 !$	
		
 



 !$
+!!, 



  
!
&
 



 $!$
	$	&! 



 &#
 



 &#
'
	 



 &	!
 



 		 
! 



 		 
!'
	 



 		 % 



 		 %'
	 



 	" $
 



 !&$!#
		 $ 	 



 !			
$$ 



 !	
&
*!&!	&	&
 



 !	
!&&!	 



 !	
' 	

	
!#
) 


Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 74 June 2006

	
 
 
	






 !	
	


&!	 



 !	
 
	$

	$+, 



 !	
$	! 



 !	
$!&
	
!$ 	 



 !	
$ 

 



 !	

		
 



 !&!!	
 



 !&!!	
'
	 



 !&!% 	"	
#
 



 !
!	
!&!
 



 !!	$!	
!
	$	!! 



 !	
+&	!, 



 !	
!
!

		
! 



 !	
!
!

		
! 



 !	
!
!

		
! 



 !-	!&!#
 



 !
$$ 



 !&! &&#!! && 



 !&$!& 



 !&(! 



 !&(!'
	 



 !		
	
 



 !		
	
 



 !		
	
'
	 



 !	

!	 



 !	

!	'
	 



 !
	

 



 !!!$
 



 !
	

 



 !
	

'
	 



 !%	!&!"!
#!%	!	 



 !"
&!
 



 !	
$	
 



 !&&	&	! 



 !
!
	
 



 !'!

	

!!#
 



 !'!

	

!!#
 



 !
	!!#&	


$)!!#
) 



 !
!
 



 !	$!
 



 !		!
		$!		 



 !	&	&!
	
"
$ 	 


Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 75 June 2006

	
 
 
	






 !'	!	
 



 !
!
$#!
*!	!$ 



 !
!




#	
"!
!
 



 !&
	
			
 



 !&
	
		&! 



 !&! 
 



 !	
!&! 



 !) 
	$
$	
 



 !	
$	$	 % 



 !	!
#!
$ 



 !!	#
 



 !	"
		 



 !	"
		 



 !	"
		'
	 



 !&


 



 !	!!
$ 



 !
$	
!	!
 



 !
$	
!	!#
 



 !
	
	
	
! 



 !
	
	
	
! 



 !

&!&&!& 



 !
!&
	

	
$ 



 !
$!!

	
	
 



 !
$!!

	
	
'
	 



 


 



 	 #
 



 	 #
'
	 



 	 



 	
$
$!! 



 	'$

 



 &

 



 $
$ 



 		"
 



 	!&			! 



 %
	!

!!!!	
		
	 



 %$!


 



 & 	

	 



 & '"
# 
 



 & '"# 
))) 



 &	!!#
 



 &$

 



 &!

 


Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 76 June 2006

	
 
 
	






 &$$

	
! 



 &&	 



 &&
 



 &	$#	$	"	
$ 



 &	
  



 &	
 '
	 



 &	
 	
 



 &	
 	
 



 &- 



 &!

 



 &	
 



 &%$
 



 &	%	 $
$#
) 



 &
#	'$	
$!
 



 &	"	

 



 &!
 	& 



 $	
$!$
	
	 



 $	
$!$
	
	 



  ! 



 

)#'
	
$#$ 	 



 
#
)'
	
$#$ 	 



 
#
)'
	
$#$ 	'
	 



 !!		
$!!
 



 
	
#	
$ 	'
	 



 &	
	
 



 	
 



 	
'
	 



 	!		
 



 
$	


 



 
$	


'
	 



 
$!

!!#
 



 
$!

!!#
'
	 



 
$!#
) 



 
# 



 
#+!
!!
, 



 !#
) 



 !#
)'
	 



 !		!	0! 	
	
$ 



 !*#	$	
#!	 



 )!)#$
	 



 )!)
	
$!	!	
	
 



 
$	
!
 


Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 77 June 2006

	
 
 
	






 
$ $%#
 



 
$!	!	
 



 
$!	!	
'
	 



 
	
+
!!
, 



 
!	+!
!!
, 



 
!	!$!#) 



 
!	
	#!	
! 



 
!!	
	#&	&!
! 



 !#	
!	$
!	
$ 



 !#	
!		!$	
 



 !! 



 !! 



 ! 



 	 



 		(
 



 	
! 



 	 !
!!
!
 



 	
	
	
 



 	
	
	
'
	 



 	!!! 



 		!
 



 		!
 



 (

	
!! 



 

#&$ 



 !#
 



 !#
'
	 



 !#
) 



 !#
) 



 !#
)'
	 



 !#
)'
	 



 !
'	!
!	(!	#
 



 !	
!$	$
 



 !		!	
 



 !		
 



 	&

 



 	$



 



  '	!!
 



 $	&!
 



 &	$
 



 !
&! 



 !
	$	
 



 !
	$	
'
	 


Staff Report 8-Hour Ozone RACT SIP Demonstration

Appendix 5 78 June 2006

	
 
 
	






 !
!	
	
 



 !
 
$ 



 &	!	
 



 &	!	
'
	 



 &
	

#!	 



 $



 



 $


$
	 



 	$	

 



 
!
$!		


 



 

 



 $	
$$)
 



 $$!!
 



 "$
 



 %%!+	$		, 



 (	
 



 (	

 



 (	
'
	 


Staff Report 8-Hour Ozon

Appendix 6 79 Table 5-2: Example of Information Available For Title V Facility 

Permit 

Number Equipment 

NOx 

(lbs/day) 

VOC 

(lbs/day) Appli

F67238 OVEN, BAKING 1 0 1107,407,409 F67240 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT 0 48 1107,1145,1171,1F67241 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT 0 48 1107,1145,1171,1F67242 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT 0 48 1107,1145,1171,1F67243 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT 0 48 1107,1145,1171,1F67244 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT 0 8 1107,1145,1171,1F67245 SPRAY BOOTH/ENCLOSURE, POWDER COATING SYSTEM 0 0 1107,1171,1401,4F67247 OVEN, POWDER COATING 2 0 1107,1401,407 F67248 SPRAY BOOTH/ENCLOSURE, POWDER COATING SYSTEM 0 0 1107,1171,1401,4F67249 SPRAY BOOTH/ENCLOSURE, POWDER COATING SYSTEM 0 0 1107,1171,404,40F67250 OVEN, COOKING OR CURING 2 0 1107,407,409 F67251 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT 0 48 1107,1145,1171,4F67252 SPRAY BOOTH/ENCLOSURE, POWDER COATING SYSTEM 0 0 1107,1171,404,40F67253 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT 0 8 1107,1145,1171,1F67255 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT 0 8 1107,1145,1171,4F67256 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT 0 0 1107,1145,1171,1F67257 SOLV RECLAIM STILL (1 STAGE) MISC. SOLV 0 1 1401 F67258 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT 0 0 1107,1145,1171,1F67259 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT 0 43 1107,1145,1171,1F67260 OVEN, BAKING 5 0 1107,404,407,409 F67261 OVEN, DRYING 1 0 1107,404,407,409 F67262 OVEN, DRYING 4 0 1107,404,407,409 F67263 OVEN, DRYING 2 0 1107,404,407,409 F67264 MISC HYDROCARBONS EVAPORATION 0 0 1107,1401,404 F67265 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT 0 8 1107,1145,1171,1F80806 SPRAY BOOTH PAINT AND SOLVENT 0 8 1107,1145,1171,4

Note: Emissions of NOx or VOC = (30-day averaged emissions in lbs/day) x (365 days/year).