alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.4    
  



	*PA-1*	 	Incorporated Under

the Laws of the State of Delaware

on May 24, 2001	 	*        *




DOT HILL SYSTEMS CORP.

7% SERIES A REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK  


THIS CERTIFIES THAT                          is the record holder of
                         Shares of the 7% Series A
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock of DOT HILL SYSTEMS CORP. transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof, in person or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of
this Certificate properly endorsed or assigned.


A statement of the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to or imposed upon the respective classes or series of shares of stock of the Corporation and upon
holders thereof as established by the Certificate of Incorporation or by any Certificate of Designation of Preferences, and the number of shares constituting each series and the designations thereof,
may be obtained by any stockholder upon request and without charge at the principal office of the Corporation.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers this
                         day of
                         200   .



	
	 	

	Secretary	 	President








 

NEITHER
THESE SECURITIES NOR THE SECURITIES INTO WHICH THESE SECURITIES ARE CONVERTIBLE HAVE BEEN REGISTERED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR THE SECURITIES COMMISSION OF ANY STATE IN
RELIANCE UPON AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE "SECURITIES ACT"), AND, ACCORDINGLY, MAY NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OR PURSUANT TO AN AVAILABLE EXEMPTION FROM, OR IN A TRANSACTION NOT SUBJECT TO, THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT AND IN ACCORDANCE
WITH APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS AS EVIDENCED BY A LEGAL OPINION OF COUNSEL TO THE TRANSFEROR TO SUCH EFFECT, THE SUBSTANCE OF WHICH SHALL BE REASONABLY ACCEPTABLE TO THE COMPANY. 


2









QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.4
1

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-155 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

October 29, 1996

NRC TERMINATES LICENSE FOR DECOMMISSIONED REACTOR

AT BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has terminated Brigham

Young University's (BYU) license for a closed research reactor on

its campus in Provo, Utah, and released the site for unrestricted

use.

BYU asked the NRC in 1990 for permission to dismantle the

reactor and dispose of its component parts. It subsequently

sought authorization to terminate the license once

decommissioning had been completed.

On August 1, 1991, the NRC published a Federal Register

notice announcing that it was considering issuing orders to

permit the dismantlement and to terminate the license. The

notice offered an opportunity for affected members of the public

to request a hearing, but no requests were received. In July

1992, NRC authorized the university to implement the

decommissioning plan and proceed with dismantlement and component

disposal.

BYU has now completely dismantled the reactor facility and

shipped the nuclear fuel to a Department of Energy facility. It

conducted a final radiation survey to demonstrate that residual

radioactive contamination at the facility has been cleaned up to

meet NRC criteria.

An NRC contractor conducted an independent survey of the

facility in April. The measurements verified that the facility

has complied with NRC guidelines for license termination and

release for unrestricted use.

###
§ 1205.15 Denying access. ( a ) *Basis.* In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the Board may deny access to records that are of an investigatory nature and that are compiled for law enforcement purposes. Those requests will be denied only where access to them would otherwise be unavailable under Exemption (b)(7) of the Freedom of Information Act.
( b ) *Form.* All denials of access under this section will be made in writing and will notify the requester of the right to judicial review.
### §60a–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 60a–2 was editorially reclassified as section 4531 of this title.
### §274. Lands containing coal or other minerals

Prospecting permits or leases may be issued in the discretion of the Secretary of the Interior under the provisions of this subchapter for deposits of sulphur in public lands also containing coal or other minerals on condition that such other deposits be reserved to the United States for disposal under applicable laws.

(Apr. 17, 1926, ch. 158, §4, 44 Stat. 302.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which comprises this chapter.
§ 207.107 Motions. ( a ) *Presentation and disposition.* ( 1 ) After issuance of the charging letter and while part of the proceeding is pending before the administrative law judge, all motions relating to that part of the proceeding shall be addressed to the administrative law judge.
( 2 ) While part of a proceeding is pending before the Commission, all motions relating to that part of the proceeding shall be addressed to the Chairman of the Commission. All written motions shall be filed with the Commission Secretary and served upon all parties.
( b ) *Content.* All written motions shall state the particular order, ruling, or action desired and the grounds therefor.
( c ) *Responses.* Any response to a motion shall be filed within ten (10) days after service of the motions, or within such longer or shorter time as may be designated by the administrative law judge or the Commission. The moving party shall have no right to reply, except as permitted by the administrative law judge or the Commission.
( d ) *Service.* All motions, responses, replies, briefs, petitions, and other documents filed in sanctions proceedings under this subpart shall be served by the party filing the document upon each other party. Service shall be made upon the attorney for the party unless the administrative law judge or the Commission orders otherwise.
### §60a–1a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 60a–1a was editorially reclassified as section 4572 of this title.
#### § 200.735-120 Information prohibited.

An employee is not required to submit in a statement of employment and financial interests or supplementary statement any information relating to the employee's connection with, or interest in, a professional society or a charitable, religious, social, fraternal, recreational, public service, civic, or political organization or similar organization not conducted as a business enterprise. For the purpose of this section, educational and other institutions doing research and development or related work involving grants of money from, or contracts with, the Government are deemed *business enterprises* and are required to be included in an employee's statement of employment and financial interests.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDurable solid lubricant coatings for foil gas bearings to 315 deg CThe durability and friction characteristics of bonded solid lubricant films on compliant gas bearings were measured. Coating compositions, which were judged to be suitable for use to at least 315 C, were selected for this study. Most of the data were obtained with polyimide-bonded graphite fluoride coatings and with silicate-bonded graphite coatings. These coatings were applied to the bore of Inconel 750 foil bearings. The journals were A286 stainless steel, with a rms surface finish of 0.2 microns. The foils were subjected to repeated start/stop cycles under a 14 kPa (2 psi) bearing unit load. Sliding contact occurred during lift-off and coast down at surface velocities less than 6 m/s (3000 rpm). Testing continued until 9000 cycles were accumulated or until a rise in starting torque indicated that the coating had failed. The coatings were evaluated in the temperature range from 25 C to 315 C. Comparisons in coating performance as well as discussions of their properties and methods of application are given.Document ID19840011499Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsWagner, R. C.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH, United States)*Sliney, H. E.*(NASA Lewis Research Center)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1984Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-83596NAS 1.15:83596E-1904Accession Number84N19567Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-33-1BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840011499.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §1a. Transfer of activities, employees, records, etc., from Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce to the United States Bureau of Mines

There is hereby transferred from the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce, to the Department of the Interior, United States Bureau of Mines, all those activities of the Minerals Division of the Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce concerned with economic and statistical analyses of mineral commodities, domestic and foreign, together with all employees, records, files, equipment, publications, and funds pertaining thereto, effective immediately.

(May 9, 1935, ch. 101, §1, 49 Stat. 205; Pub. L. 102–285, §10(b), May 18, 1992, 106 Stat. 172.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"United States Bureau of Mines" substituted in text for "Bureau of Mines" pursuant to section 10(b) of Pub. L. 102–285, set out as a note under section 1 of this title. For provisions relating to closure and transfer of functions of the United States Bureau of Mines, see Transfer of Functions note set out under section 1 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1452 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1452

To provide that the language of the text of United States passports is 
                    written in English and Spanish.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2003

 Mr. Sessions (for himself, Mr. Kingston, Mr. Brady of Texas, and Mr. 
  Sullivan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that the language of the text of United States passports is 
                    written in English and Spanish.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANGUAGE OF UNITED STATES PASSPORTS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
language of the text of all regular United States passports shall be 
written in English and Spanish.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) shall take effect one year 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

Calendar No. 598 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1572 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 4, 2003 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

JUNE 24, 2004 

Reported by Mr. INHOFE, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 100 

North Palafox Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ‘‘Winston E. Arnow United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse located at 100 North 

5 Palafox Street in Pensacola, Florida, shall be known and 

6 designated as the ‘‘Winston E. Arnow United States 

7 Courthouse’’. 
2 

•HR 1572 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘Winston E. Arnow United States 

6 Courthouse’’. 

Calendar No. 598 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1572 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse located 

Courthouse’’. ida, as the ‘‘Winston E. Arnow United States at 100 North Palafox Street in Pensacola, FlorJUNE 24, 2004 

Reported without amendment
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Office of Adjudication

November 30,2016 VIAU.S. MAIL and FAX Casey E. Gardner, Esq. Federal Aviation Administration EnforcementDivision, AGC-300 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20591 800 Independence Ave., S.W, Rm 323 Washington, D.C. 20591

Todd Emerson, Esq. Sky West Airlines 444 S. RiverRoad St. George, UT 84790

Re: SkyWestAirlines, Inc., FDMS Nos. FAA-2013-0292; FAA-2012-0777; FAA-2012- 0868; FAA-2012-0869; FAA-2012-0872; FAA-2012-0873; FAA-2012-0874; FAA-2012-0904; FAA-2013-0617; FAA-2013-0619 Dear Ms. Gardner and Mr. Emerson: On November 29,2016, you filed a sixthjointmotion to hold decisions in abeyance pending the outcome of settlement negotiations. You once again explained that "the parties are diligently pursuing settlement ofthese cases" through "continuing and ongoing" discussions. As a result, you requested that the Administrator not issue any decisions regarding the referenced cases on appeal pendingthe outcome ofthese negotiations and further motion bythe parties. -In light ofthis latestmotion, the Administrator will not issue any decisions inthese cases for 60 calendar days from the date ofthis letter, or until negotiations are concluded, whichever comes first. Please continue to update the Hearing Docket Clerkregarding any developments.

AnthonyN. Palladino Director and Administrative Judge
#### § 144.39 Permit to transfer and withdraw merchandise.

With the exception of merchandise transferred under the procedures of § 144.34(c), if all legal and regulatory requirements are met, the appropriate Customs officer shall approve the application to transfer or withdraw merchandise from a bonded warehouse by endorsing the permit copy and returning it to the applicant. The approved permit shall be presented by the withdrawer to the warehouse proprietor as evidence of Customs authorization of the transfer or withdrawal. The approved permit copy shall thereafter be retained in the warehouse entry file of the proprietor. Goods covered by permit may be retained in the bonded warehouse at the option of the proprietor.

[T.D. 82-204, 47 FR 49376, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended by T.D. 97-19, 62 FR 15842, Apr. 3, 1997]
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Hearth & Home article by Dr. James Houck regarding the proposed NSPS for Residential Wood Heaters.
This document can be viewed at the USEPA Docket Center Public Reading Room. Address: 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 3334, Washington, DC 20004. Telephone: 202-566-1744; Fax: 202-566-9744; Email: docket-customerservice@epa.gov
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23812]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee and the 
Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee 
and the Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on Wednesday, 
November 10, 2004, at the Sunnyslope Fire Station, Rural County Fire 
District <greek-i>1, 206 Easy Street, Wenatchee, Washington. The 
meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and continue until 3 p.m. During this 
meeting we will share information on new developments relating to the 
Northwest Forest Plan, an update on Burned Area Recovery projects, 
report on fuels reduction and fuels accomplishments in 2004, discuss 
the Healthy Forest Restoration Act as it relates to the Okanogan and 
Wenatchee National Forest, and discuss future needs for a Snoqualimie 
Pass Adaptive Management Area Subcommittee. All Eastern Washington 
Cascades and Yakima Province Advisory Committee meetings are open to 
the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Paul Hart, Designated Federal Official, USDA, Wenatchee 
National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington 98801, 509-664-
9200.

    Dated: October 19, 2004.
Paul Hart,
Designated Federal Official, Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests.
[FR Doc. 04-23812 Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Hernan BORDA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-8049.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 9, 2002.

Decided May 29, 2002.

Jose Hernán Borda, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Jose Hernán Borda seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001), his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion as to that order, and his motion for a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See United States v. Borda,*Nos. CR-95-267-AW; CA-00-1527-AW (D. Md. Aug. 28, Sept. 6, and Nov. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of eMagin Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew G. Sculley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








March 25, 2010
By:
/s/ Andrew G. SculleyAndrew G. SculleyChief Executive Officer
§ 206.15 Institution of investigation. ( a ) *In general.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the Commission, after receipt of a petition under this subpart B, properly filed, will promptly institute an appropriate investigation and will cause a notice thereof to be published in the Federal Register.
( b ) *Exceptions* —(1) *Reinvestigation within one* ( 1 ) *year.* Except for good cause determined by the Commission to exist, no new investigation will be made under section 202 of the Trade Act with respect to the same subject matter as a previous investigation under section 202 unless one (1) year has elapsed since the Commission made its report to the President of the results of such previous investigation.
( 2 ) *Articles subject to prior action.* No new investigation will be made under section 202 of the Trade Act with respect to an article that is or has been the subject of an action under section 203(a) (3)(A), (B), (C), or (E) of the Trade Act if the last day on which the President could take action under section 203 of the Trade Act in the new investigation is a date earlier than that permitted under section 203(e)(7) of the Trade Act.
( 3 ) *Articles subject to the Textiles Agreement.* No investigation will be made under section 202 of the Trade Act with respect to an article that is the subject of the WTO Agreement on Textiles and Clothing unless the United States has integrated the article into GATT 1994 and the Secretary of Commerce has published notice to such effect in the Federal Register.
( 4 ) *Perishable agricultural product.* An entity of the type described in § 206.13 that represents a domestic industry producing a perishable agricultural product may petition for provisional relief with respect to such product only if such product has been subject to monitoring by the Commission for not less than 90 days as of the date the allegation of injury is included in the petition.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1313 Prepped by LaTeia Shed


### Document

Number: 

# 4 ) l-A- 3 Docket Number: 

# A-88-0 2

Printed 6/12/20089:03:27

AM Sheet 4 of 99P. 2 

## A-88-0 2
Informatio n o n healt ho r ris k assessmen t wa s remove d fromth e docket . Thi s informatio n wa s compile d befor e th e Clea n Ai r Ac t Amendment s (1990 ) bu t wa s no t use d i n th e developmen t o f th e chromiu

mNESHAP . 

# tH JM (

# 1 

# 819 9 i l EPA AI RDOCKE T
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of CFO**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United StatesCode), the undersigned officer of Gateway, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Gateway”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

a) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “Form 10-Q”) of Gateway fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

b) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gateway. 

Dated: November 3, 2006 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Form 10-Q pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Gateway, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.