alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 210.74 Modification of reporting requirements. ( a ) *Exclusion and cease and desist orders.* The Commission may modify reporting requirements of exclusion and cease and desist orders as necessary: ( 1 ) To help the Commission assist the U.S. Customs Service in ascertaining that there has been compliance with an outstanding exclusion order;
( 2 ) To help the Commission ascertain that there has been compliance with a cease and desist order;
( 3 ) To take account of changed circumstances; or
( 4 ) To minimize the burden of reporting or informational access. An order to modify reporting requirements shall identify the reports involved and state the reason or reasons for modification. No reporting requirement will be suspended during the pendency of such a modification unless the Commission so orders. The Commission may, if the public interest warrants, announce that a modification of reporting is under consideration and ask for comment, but it may also modify any reporting requirement at any time without notice, consistent with the standards of this section.
( b ) *Consent orders.* Consistent with the standards set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, the Commission may modify reporting requirements of consent orders. The Commission shall serve notice of any proposed change, together with the reporting requirements to be modified and the reasons therefor, on each party subject to the consent order. Such parties shall be given the opportunity to submit briefs to the Commission, and the Commission may hold a hearing on the matter. Notice of any proposed change in the reporting requirements will be published in the Federal Register if the Commission determines to solicit public comment on the proposed change.
[59 FR 39039, Aug. 1, 1994, as amended at 60 FR 53121, Oct. 12, 1995]
Summary of Requirements for ADM CCS#2 Page A 1 of 2

Permit Number: IL

- 115

- 6A

- 0001 ATTACHMENT A : SUMMARY OF REQUIREMENTS

CLASS VI OPERATING AND REPORTING CONDITIONS

Facility name: Archer Daniels Midland, CCS#2 Well

IL -115-6A-0001

Facility contact: Mr. Mark Burau, Plant Manager 4666 Faries Parkway, Decatur, IL (217) 424-5750, mark.burau@adm.com

Well location: Decatur, Macon County, IL; 39o53’08”, -89o53’19”

Injection Well Operating Conditions

PARAMETER/CONDITION LIMITATION or PERMITTED

VALUE UNIT

Maximum Injection Pressure

- Surface 2 284 psig

Annulus Pressure 100 minimum psig Annulus Pressure/Tubing Differential 100 above surface injection pressure psig

The injection pressure will be measured at the wellhead.

The maximum injection pressure, which serves to prevent confining- formation fracturing, was determined using the fracture gradient obtained from injectivity data from the nearby CCS#1 well multiplied by 0.9 (146.88 (a)

Routine Shutdown Procedure: Under routine conditions (e.g., for well workovers), t he permittee will reduce CO 2 injection at a

rate of 500 tons per day over a 6 day period to ensure protection of health, safety, and the

environment. (Procedures that address immediately shutting in the well are in Attachment F (Emergency and Remedial Response Pla n) of this permit).

Class VI Injection Well Reporting Frequencies

ACTIVITY MINIMUM REPORTING FREQUENCY

CO 2 stream characterization Semi

- annually

Pressure, flow, rate, volume, pressure on the annulus, annulus fluid level and temperature Semi -annually

C orrosion monitoring Semi

- annually

E xternal MIT Within 30 days of completion of test

P ressure fall

- off testing In the next semi

- annual report Note: All testing and monitoring frequencies and methodologies are included in Attachment C (the Testing and Monitoring Plan) of this permit.Summary of Requirements for ADM CCS#2 Page A 2 of 2

Permit Number: IL

- 115

- 6A

- 0001 Class VI Project Reporting Frequencies

ACTIVITY MINIMUM REPORTING FREQUENCY

G round water quality monitoring Semi

- annually

P lume and pressure front tracking In the next semi

- annual report

S urface air and/or soil gas monitoring In the next semi

- annual report Monitoring well MITs Within 30 days of completion of test Financial Responsibility updates pursuant to H.2 and H.3(a) of this permit Within 60 days of update

Note: All testing and monitoring frequencies and methodologies are included in Attachment C (the Testing and Monitoring Plan) of this permit.
CERTIFICATION OF  CFO PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Industries, Ltd. ("Global") on Form10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on May 7, 2004 (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
SS 1350 as adopted pursuant to SS 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge based upon a review of the Report, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global as of the dates and for periods presented as required by such Report.





/S/ TIMOTHY W. MICIOTTOTimothy W. MiciottoChief Financial OfficerMay 7, 2004


This certification is provided pursuant to
SS 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Global or the certifying officer for purposes of
SS 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by
SS 906 has been provided to Global Industries, Ltd. and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Continuing Abatement Order filed November 14, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14
- 18
- 00009
- CR NO. 14
- 18
- 00010
- CR NO. 14
- 18
- 00021
- CR

____________ STEVEN KURT BAUGHMA N , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
On Appeal fr om the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. 1423421


### CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER On July 25, 2019 , this c ourt directed the trial court to conduct a hearing in this case to determine whether appellant needed appointment of new cou nsel

. Our order required the trial judge to see that a record of the hearing is made, make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and order the trial clerk to forward a record of the hearing and a supplemental clerk ’ s record containing the findings andc onclusions. The transcribed record of the hearing and the courts findings and

conclusions were to be filed with the clerk of this c ourt on or before August 29, 2019 . To date, the court has received a record of the hearing, but has no t received a supplement al cl erk ’ s record containing the trial court ’ s findings or an order appointing new counsel

. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this c ourt ’ s active docket. The app eal will be reinstated on this c ourt ’ s active docket when the

s upplemental clerk ’ s record is filed in this c ourt.
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIA M

P anel Consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Spain.
#### Henry Hart and Others, Appellants, v. Lancaster Sea Beach Improvement Company, Respondent.

Motion denied, without costs, on condition that the defendant stipulate, within five days after the entry of the order herein, that upon the trial of the action plaintiff’s right to injunctive relief, if any, shall not he prejudiced toy reason of any acts of' the defendant committed during the pendency of this action. Present — Burr, Thomas, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2


                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                        Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



William H.  Hardman,  Jr., the Vice  President,  Treasurer  and Chief  Financial
Officer of Delta Mills, Inc. (the "Company"),  hereby certifies that to the best
of his knowledge:

     1.   The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 2, 2005 of the
          Company, as amended by the Amendment to which this certificate is an
          exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
          section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.





Date    October 5, 2005                 By: /s/ W. H. Hardman, Jr.
      ------------------------------    ------------------------------------
                                        W.H. Hardman, Jr.
                                        Chief Financial Officer





A signed copy of this written statement required by section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Katie H. Finck, as Executrix of Peter House, Deceased.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs, unless appellant complies with terms stated in order. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1533

To amend the securities laws to permit church pension plans to be invested 

in collective trusts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2003

Mrs. BIGGERT (for herself and Mr. FORD) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL

To amend the securities laws to permit church pension plans 

to be invested in collective trusts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS FOR CHURCH 

4 PLAN PARTICIPATION IN COLLECTIVE 

5 FUNDS. 

6 (a) AMENDMENT TO THE INVESTMENT COMPANY

7 ACT OF 1940.—Section 3(c)(11) of the Investment Com8 pany Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-3(c)(11)) is amended 

9 by striking ‘‘such trusts or government plans, or both’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘one or more of such trusts, government 
2

•HR 1533 IH 

1 plans, or church plans, companies or accounts that are ex2 cluded from the definition of an investment company 

3 under paragraph (14) of this subsection’’. 

4 (b) AMENDMENTS TO THE SECURITIES ACT OF

5 1933.—Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 

6 U.S.C. 77c(a)(2)) is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (B); 

8 and 

9 (2) by inserting before ‘‘other than any plan de10 scribed in clause (A)’’ the following: ‘‘, or (D) a 

11 church plan, company, or account that is excluded 

12 from the definition of an investment company under 

13 section 3(c)(14) of the Investment Company Act of 

14 1940,’’. 

15 (c) AMENDMENTS TO THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE

16 ACT OF 1934.—

17 (1) Section 3(a)(12)(C) of the Securities Ex18 change Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(12)(C)) is 

19 amended—

20 (A) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause 

21 (ii); and 

22 (B) by inserting before ‘‘other than any 

23 plan described in clause (i)’’ the following: ‘‘or 

24 (iv) a church plan, company, or account that is 

25 excluded from the definition of an investment 
3

•HR 1533 IH 

1 company under section 3(c)(14) of the Invest2 ment Company Act of 1940,’’. 

3 (2) Section 12(g)(2)(H) of the Securities Ex4 change Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78l(g)(2)(H)) is 

5 amended—

6 (A) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause 

7 (i); and 

8 (B) by inserting before the period at the 

9 end the following: ‘‘, or (iii) a church plan, com10 pany, or account that is excluded from the defi11 nition of an investment company under section 

12 3(c)(14) of the Investment Company Act of 

13 1940’’.

Æ
#### § 204.5 Reports.

After completion of its investigation, the Commission will transmit to the President a report of the results thereof, including its findings and recommendations based thereon, and a statement of the steps taken in the investigation, together with a transcript of the evidence submitted at the hearing. A copy of such report will be transmitted to the Secretary of Agriculture.

[49 FR 32571, Aug. 15, 1984]
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 118

**Question 118:** 10 CFR 20.1101 (c) requires that each licensee "periodically (at least annually) review the radiation program content and implementation." A nuclear power plant has many reviews and audits (including quality assurance audits) of various aspects of their radiation protection programs during a year and reviews are on a schedule that covers all phases of the program on a 2-3-year review cycle. Is this acceptable to the NRC?

**Answer:** Yes, provided that the combination of these reviews and audits covers program content and implementation. Reviews and audits at nuclear power plants should incorporate the following features to assess procedural compliance, technical performance, implementation, and effectiveness of the facility radiation protection program.

Radiation protection supervisory reviews:

Onsite radiation protection supervisors should periodically perform and document reviews of the effectiveness of the radiation protection staff in such areas as radiological work practices, work monitoring, procedural compliance, and survey adequacy.

Quality assurance audits:

Quality assurance audits should be performed by the onsite auditing group. Personnel in the auditing group should have sufficient radiation protection training or experience so they can determine whether radiation protection functions are being performed as required. The quality assurance program audits should meet the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50.

Corporate or contract audits:

Offsite (corporate or contract) audits and evaluations should be performed to determine whether the radiation protection program complies with the regulations and other requirements and whether plant-wide objectives are being met as well as to identify needed program improvements.

(Reference: 10 CFR 20.1101)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 31, 2017
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The ACRS Subcommittee on Regulatory Policies and Practices will hold a meeting on October 28 and 29, 2004, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

The entire meeting will be open to public attendance.

The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

*Thursday, October 28, 2004—8:30 a.m. until the conclusion of business*

*Friday, October 29, 2004—8:30 a.m. until the conclusion of business*

The purpose of this meeting is to review the proposed rule package for risk-informing 50.46. The Subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff and other interested persons regarding this matter. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.

Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. Michael R. Snodderly (Telephone: 301-415-6927) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted during the meeting.

Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Officials between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

Dated: October 14, 2004.

John H. Flack,

Acting Branch Chief, ACRS/ACNW.

[FR Doc. 04-23429 Filed 10-19-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
EX 23-CONSENT OF BDO SEIDMAN, LLP


                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
CellPoint Inc. and Subsidiaries
Kista, Sweden

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the respective
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-86100) and Form S-8 (No. 333-52884)
of CellPoint Inc. and in the Prospectuses constituting part of such Registration
Statements of our report dated October 11, 2002 relating to the financial
statements of CellPoint Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2002. Our report contains an explanatory
paragraph regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


BDO Seidman, LLP

New York, New York
October 17,2001
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 333-98801 and No. 333-66741) pertaining to the Penwest
Pharmaceuticals Co. 1997 Equity Incentive Plan, in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-66747) pertaining to the Penwest Pharmaceuticals Co. 1997
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-66739) pertaining to the Penwest Pharmaceuticals Co. Savings Plan, in
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-66733) pertaining to the Penwest
Pharmaceuticals Co. 1998 Spinoff Option Plan, in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-32940) of Penwest Pharmaceuticals Co. and in the related
Prospectus and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-65840 and
Amendment No. 1 thereto) of Penwest Pharmaceuticals Co. and in the related
Prospectus of our report dated March 17, 2003, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Penwest Pharmaceuticals Co. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.


                                                         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 28, 2003
#### Charles Fresusk, Respondent, v. Pittsburgh Contracting Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present —Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EASTERN
AMERICAN NATURAL GAS TRUST'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 CONTAINED IN THE TRUST'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIALS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,529
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,550,443
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,551,972
<PP&E>                                      93,162,180
<DEPRECIATION>                              38,679,262
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,034,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,551,972
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  54,482,918
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,034,890
<SALES>                                      7,226,696
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,226,696
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  863,837
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (130,068)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,492,927
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,492,927
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,492,927
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 162.6 Search of persons, baggage, and merchandise.

All persons, baggage, and merchandise arriving in the Customs territory of the United States from places outside thereof are liable to inspection and search by a Customs officer. Port directors and special agents in charge are authorized to cause inspection, examination, and search to be made under section 467, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1467), of persons, baggage, or merchandise, even though such persons, baggage, or merchandise were inspected, examined, searched, or taken on board the vessel at another port or place in the United States or the Virgin Islands, if such action is deemed necessary or appropriate.

[T.D. 72-211, 37 FR 16488, Aug. 15, 1972]
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

April 3, 2008

Before

JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge

KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

Nos. 06

‐ 2901 & 06

‐ 3252

ERIC JOELNER, FISH, INC. D/B/A

XXXTREME ENTERTAINMENT, FREE

SPEECH, INC., and FIRST AMENDMENT,

INC.,

Plaintiffs

‐ Appellees

,

v.

THE VILLAGE OF WASHINGTON PARK,

ILLINOIS,

Defendant

‐ Appellant

. Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Southern

District of Illinois.

No. 03 C 325

G. Patrick Murphy,

Judge

.

ORDER

The opinion issued in the above

‐ entitled cause, Joelner v. Village of Washington Park

, 508

F.3d 427 (7 th Cir. 2007) is amended as follows:

At page 433, column one, lines 21 and 22, the parenthetical “(from which the alcohol ban

is not severable)” is deleted.

Now, on consideration of the Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing and the Answer to

Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing, filed herein, all of the judges on the original panel have

voted to deny rehearing. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing

is DENIED

.