64358 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2018 / Notices 

1Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures: 

https://www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_

filing_procedures.pdf. 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, 

each document filed by a party to the 

investigation must be served on all other 

parties to the investigation (as identified 

by either the public or BPI service list), 

and a certificate of service must be 

timely filed. The Secretary will not 

accept a document for filing without a 

certificate of service. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: December 10, 2018. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2018–27088 Filed 12–13–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Receipt of Complaint; 

Solicitation of Comments Relating to 

the Public Interest 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has received a complaint 

entitled Certain Dental and Orthodontic 

Scanners and Software, DN 3357; the 

Commission is soliciting comments on 

any public interest issues raised by the 

complaint or complainant’s filing 

pursuant to the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa 

R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 

20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. The 

public version of the complaint can be 

accessed on the Commission’s 

Electronic Document Information 

System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov, 

and will be available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server at United 

States International Trade Commission 

(USITC) at https://www.usitc.gov. The 

public record for this investigation may 

be viewed on the Commission’s 

Electronic Document Information 

System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission has received a complaint 

and a submission pursuant to § 210.8(b) 

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure filed on behalf of Align 

Technology, Inc., on December 10, 2018. 

The complaint alleges violations of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 

U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain dental and 

orthodontic scanners and software. The 

complaint names as respondents: 

3Shape A/S of Denmark; 3Shape, Inc. of 

Warren, NJ; and 3Shape Trios A/S of 

Denmark. The complainant requests that 

the Commission issue a limited 

exclusion order, cease and desist orders 

and impose a bond during the 60-day 

review period pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 

1337(j). 

Proposed respondents, other 

interested parties, and members of the 

public are invited to file comments, not 

to exceed five (5) pages in length, 

inclusive of attachments, on any public 

interest issues raised by the complaint 

or § 210.8(b) filing. Comments should 

address whether issuance of the relief 

specifically requested by the 

complainant in this investigation would 

affect the public health and welfare in 

the United States, competitive 

conditions in the United States 

economy, the production of like or 

directly competitive articles in the 

United States, or United States 

consumers. 

In particular, the Commission is 

interested in comments that: 

(i) Explain how the articles 

potentially subject to the requested 

remedial orders are used in the United 

States; 

(ii) identify any public health, safety, 

or welfare concerns in the United States 

relating to the requested remedial 

orders; 

(iii) identify like or directly 

competitive articles that complainant, 

its licensees, or third parties make in the 

United States which could replace the 

subject articles if they were to be 

excluded; 

(iv) indicate whether complainant, 

complainant’s licensees, and/or third 

party suppliers have the capacity to 

replace the volume of articles 

potentially subject to the requested 

exclusion order and/or a cease and 

desist order within a commercially 

reasonable time; and 

(v) explain how the requested 

remedial orders would impact United 

States consumers. 

Written submissions on the public 

interest must be filed no later than by 

close of business, eight calendar days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register. There 

will be further opportunities for 

comment on the public interest after the 

issuance of any final initial 

determination in this investigation. Any 

written submissions on other issues 

should be filed no later than by close of 

business nine calendar days after the 

date of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register. Complainant may file 

a reply to any written submission no 

later than the date on which 

complainant’s reply would be due 

under § 210.8(c)(2) of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.8(c)(2)). 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document 

electronically on or before the deadlines 

stated above and submit 8 true paper 

copies to the Office of the Secretary by 

noon the next day pursuant to § 210.4(f) 

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). 

Submissions should refer to the docket 

number (‘‘Docket No. 3357’’) in a 

prominent place on the cover page and/ 

or the first page. (See Handbook for 

Electonic Filing Procedures, Electronic 

Filing Procedures.1) Persons with 

questions regarding filing should 

contact the Secretary (202–205–2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment. All such requests should be 

directed to the Secretary to the 

Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. All such requests 

should be directed to the Secretary to 

the Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. All information, 

including confidential business 

information and documents for which 

confidential treatment is properly 

sought, submitted to the Commission for 

purposes of this Investigation may be 

disclosed to and used: (i) By the 

Commission, its employees and Offices, 

and contract personnel (a) for 

developing or maintaining the records 

of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in 

internal investigations, audits, reviews, 

and evaluations relating to the 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2018 / Notices 64359 

2All contract personnel will sign appropriate 

nondisclosure agreements. 

3Electronic Document Information System 

(EDIS): https://edis.usitc.gov. 

programs, personnel, and operations of 

the Commission including under 5 

U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. 

government employees and contract 

personnel,2 solely for cybersecurity 

purposes. All nonconfidential written 

submissions will be available for public 

inspection at the Office of the Secretary 

and on EDIS.3

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 

and of §§ 201.10 and 210.8(c) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: December 10, 2018. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2018–27087 Filed 12–13–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

United States v. James Dolan; 

Proposed Final Judgment and 

Competitive Impact Statement 

Notice is hereby given pursuant to the 

Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 

15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), that a proposed 

Final Judgment, Stipulation, and 

Competitive Impact Statement have 

been filed with the United States 

District Court for the District of 

Columbia in United States of America v. 

James Dolan, Civil Action No. 1:18–cv– 

02858. On December 6, 2018, the United 

States filed a Complaint alleging that 

James Dolan violated the notice and 

waiting period requirements of the HartScott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements 

Act of 1976, 15 U.S.C. 18a, with respect 

to his acquisition of voting securities of 

Madison Square Garden Company. The 

proposed Final Judgment, filed at the 

same time as the Complaint, requires 

James Dolan to pay a civil penalty of 

$609,810. 

Copies of the Complaint, proposed 

Final Judgment, and Competitive Impact 

Statement are available for inspection 

on the Antitrust Division’s website at 

http://www.justice.gov/atr and at the 

Office of the Clerk of the United States 

District Court for the District of 

Columbia. Copies of these materials may 

be obtained from the Antitrust Division 

upon request and payment of the 

copying fee set by Department of Justice 

regulations. 

Public comment is invited within 60 

days of the date of this notice. Such 

comments, including the name of the 

submitter, and responses thereto, will be 

posted on the Antitrust Division’s 

website, filed with the Court, and, under 

certain circumstances, published in the 

Federal Register. Comments should be 

directed to Roberta S. Baruch, Special 

Attorney, United States, c/o Federal 

Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania 

Avenue NW, CC–8416, Washington, DC 

20580 (telephone: 202–326–2861; 

e-mail: rbaruch@ftc.gov). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Director of Civil Enforcement. 

United States District Court for the 

District of Columbia 

United States of America, c/o Department 

of Justice, 

Washington, D.C. 20530, Plaintiff, v. James L. 

Dolan, c/o The Madison Square Garden 

Company, Two Penn Plaza, New York, NY 

10121, Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-02858 

COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL PENALTIES 

FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE 

PREMERGER REPORTING AND 

WAITING REQUIREMENTS OF THE 

HART-SCOTT RODINO ACT 

The United States of America, 

Plaintiff, by its attorneys, acting under 

the direction of the Attorney General of 

the United States and at the request of 

the Federal Trade Commission, brings 

this civil antitrust action to obtain 

monetary relief in the form of civil 

penalties against Defendant James L. 

Dolan (‘‘Dolan’’). Plaintiff alleges as 

follows: 

NATURE OF THE ACTION 

1. Dolan violated the notice and 

waiting period requirements of the HartScott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements 

Act of 1976, 15 U.S.C. § 18a (‘‘HSR Act’’ 

or ‘‘Act’’), with respect to the 

acquisition of voting securities of the 

Madison Square Garden Company 

(‘‘MSG’’) in 2017. 

JURISDICTION AND VENUE 

2. This Court has jurisdiction over the 

subject matter of this action pursuant to 

Section 7A(g) of the Clayton Act, 15 

U.S.C. § 18a(g), and pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1337(a), 1345, and 1355 

and over the Defendant by virtue of 

Defendant’s consent, in the Stipulation 

relating hereto, to the maintenance of 

this action and entry of the Final 

Judgment in this District. 

3. Venue is properly based in this 

District by virtue of Defendant’s 

consent, in the Stipulation relating 

hereto, to the maintenance of this action 

and entry of the Final Judgment in this 

District. 

THE DEFENDANT 

4. Defendant Dolan is a natural person 

with his principal office and place of 

business at Two Penn Plaza, New York, 

NY 10121. Dolan is engaged in 

commerce, or in activities affecting 

commerce, within the meaning of 

Section 1 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 

§ 12, and Section 7A(a)(1) of the Clayton 

Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18a(a)(1). At all times 

relevant to this complaint, Dolan had 

sales or assets in excess of $161.5 

million. 

OTHER ENTITY 

5. MSG is a corporation organized 

under the laws of Delaware with its 

principal place of business at Two Penn 

Plaza, New York, NY 10121. MSG is 

engaged in commerce, or in activities 

affecting commerce, within the meaning 

of Section 1 of the Clayton Act, 15 

U.S.C. § 12, and Section 7A(a)(1) of the 

Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18a(a)(1). At all 

times relevant to this complaint, MSG 

had sales or assets in excess of $16.6 

million. 

THE HART-SCOTT-RODINO ACT AND 

RULES 

6. The HSR Act requires certain 

acquiring persons and certain persons 

whose voting securities or assets are 

acquired to file notifications with the 

Department of Justice and the Federal 

Trade Commission (collectively, the 

‘‘federal antitrust agencies’’) and to 

observe a waiting period before 

consummating certain acquisitions of 

voting securities or assets. 15 U.S.C. 

§ 18a(a) and (b). These notification and 

waiting period requirements apply to 

acquisitions that meet the HSR Act’s 

thresholds, which have been adjusted 

annually since 2004. The size of 

transaction threshold is $50 million, as 

adjusted ($80.8 million for most of 

2017). In addition, there is a separate 

filing requirement for transactions in 

which the acquirer will hold voting 

securities in excess of $100 million, as 

adjusted ($161.5 million in 2017), and 

for transactions in which the acquirer 

will hold voting securities in excess of 

$500 million, as adjusted ($807.5 

million in 2017). With respect to the 

size of person thresholds, the HSR Act 

requires one person involved in the 

transaction to have sales or assets in 

excess of $10 million, as adjusted ($16.6 

million in 2017), and the other person 

to have sales or assets in excess of $100 

million, as adjusted ($161.5 million in 

2017). 

7. The HSR Act’s notification and 

waiting period requirements are 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1