alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3. Duties of United States Bureau of Mines

It shall be the province and duty of the United States Bureau of Mines, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, to conduct inquiries and scientific and technologic investigations concerning mining, and the preparation, treatment, and utilization of mineral substances with a view to improving health conditions, and increasing safety, efficiency, economic development, and conserving resources through the prevention of waste in the mining, quarrying, metallurgical, and other mineral industries; to inquire into the economic conditions affecting these industries; to investigate explosives and peat; and on behalf of the Government to investigate the mineral fuels and unfinished mineral products belonging to, or for the use of, the United States, with a view to their most efficient mining, preparation, treatment, and use; and to disseminate information concerning these subjects in such manner as will best carry out the purposes of the provisions of sections 1, 3, and 5 to 7 of this title.

(May 16, 1910, ch. 240, §2, 36 Stat. 370; Feb. 25, 1913, ch. 72, §2, 37 Stat. 681; Ex. Ord. No. 4239, June 4, 1925; Ex. Ord. No. 6611, Feb. 22, 1934; Pub. L. 102–285, §10(b), May 18, 1992, 106 Stat. 172.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"United States Bureau of Mines" substituted in text for "Bureau of Mines" pursuant to section 10(b) of Pub. L. 102–285, set out as a note under section 1 of this title. For provisions relating to closure and transfer of functions of the United States Bureau of Mines, see Transfer of Functions note set out under section 1 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             435
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   435
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     434
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,865
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,450
<OTHER-SE>                                       (981)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       434
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,861
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,349)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,349)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,349)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00



</TABLE>
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400, Arlington TX 76011-8064

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. IV-02-047 November 27, 2002

CONTACT: Roger Hannah E-mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS SPECIAL INSPECTION

OF COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 SHUTDOWN

Officials of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with TXU Generation

Management Company officials at 1:00 p.m. (CST) Tuesday, December 10, in Training Room 1 of the

plant’s Engineering Building. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the results of the NRC’s special

inspection of the recent shutdown of Unit 1 at the Comanche Peak nuclear plant due to a leaking steam

generator tube. 

The meeting is between the NRC and TXU but is open to observation by interested members of

the public. NRC officials will also be available prior to its conclusion to answer any questions

observers may have.

In late September, operators at the Comanche Peak initiated a shutdown of Unit 1 after

observing indications of a minor leak in a steam generator tube. The company had planned to take

Unit 1 out of service for a refueling outage anyway and was not required to shut down, but did so as a

precautionary measure. 

In a pressurized water reactor such as Comanche Peak, steam generators are used to heat water

into steam which is then used to turn turbine-generators and make electricity. The steam generators

contain thousands of tubes which circulate heated water from the reactor vessel, heating the water

surrounding these tubes. The water surrounding the tubes is clean, but the water from the reactor

contains some radioactivity. The tubes normally provide a boundary between those two water sources,

but a leak or rupture in a tube allows leakage from the reactor, or primary side, to the turbine-generator,

or secondary side.

The NRC’s special inspection was conducted in mid-October and included a thorough review

of the sequence of events and the plant staff’s response, evaluation and corrective actions. The NRC’s

final inspection report will be available to the public about 30 days after the meeting. 

###
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


The Board of Directors
Doskocil Manufacturing Company, Inc. and Spectrum Polymers, Ltd.:

We have audited the combined statements of operations, equity, and cash flows of
Doskocil Manufacturing, Inc. and Spectrum Polymers, Ltd. for the years ended
December 28, 1996 and December 30, 1995. These combined financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's and the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined financial statements
based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing 
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain 
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of 
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence 
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit 
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement 
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our 
opinion.

In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above present 
fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and the cash flows 
of Doskocil Manufacturing Company, Inc. and Spectrum Polymers, Ltd. for the 
years ended December 28, 1996 and December 30, 1995, in conformity with 
generally accepted accounting principles.

                                           KPMG Peat Marwick LLP 

Fort Worth, Texas
March 12, 1997
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0161 - 2003 Annual Update - Status of Decommissioning Program

Accession Number: ML023650707

Date Released: Thursday, September 25, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML032250265 - SECY-03-0161 - 2003 Annual Update -  Status of Decommissioning Program (10 page(s), 9/15/2003)
    - ML032250278 - SECY-03-0161-Attachment 1:  Decommissioning Program Activities (11 page(s), 9/15/2003)
    - ML032250285 - SECY-03-0161-Attachment 2:  Criteria for Placing Sites on the SDMP List (1 page(s), 9/15/2003)
    - ML032250290 - SECY-03-0161-Attachment 3:  Current SDMP and Complex Decommissioning Sites (3 page(s), 9/15/2003)
    - ML032250423 - SECY-03-0161-Attachment 4:  Sites Removed from the SDMP Acter Successful Remediation (5 page(s), 9/15/2003)
    - ML032250427 - SECY-03-0161-Attachment 5:  Sites Removed from the SDMP by Tranfer to Agreement States or EPA (3 page(s), 9/15/2003)
    - ML032250431 - SECY-03-0161-Attachment 6:  Contaminated Formerly Licensed Sites (2 page(s), 9/15/2003)
    - ML032250437 - SECY-03-0161-Attachment 7:  Other Sites Undergoing Decommissioning (2 page(s), 9/15/2003)
    - ML032250442 - SECY-03-0161-Attachment 8:  Site Status Summaries for SDMP and Complex Decommissioning Sites (33 page(s), 9/15/2003)
    - ML032250451 - SECY-03-0161-Attachment 10:  Schedule for Reactor Decommissioning Activities (2 page(s), 9/15/2003)
    - ML032250454 - SECY-03-0161-Attachment 11:  Research and Test Reactors Decommissining Status (2 page(s), 9/15/2003)
    - ML032250457 - SECY-03-0161-Attachment 12:  Title II Site Decommissioning Status (3 page(s), 9/15/2003)
    - ML032250461 - SECY-03-0161-Attachment 13:  Major Decommissioning Documents (3 page(s), 9/15/2003)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
November 1 , 2011

By Email

Mr. Robert Finamore

, Acting Division Chief

Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: PLUNA Líneas Aéreas Uruguayas Sociedad Anónima (“PLUNA ”)

Application for an Exemption (US

- Uruguay); OST

- 2011

- 0195

Dear Mr. Finamore

,

PLUNA has completed its poll of the carrier parties served with its application of

October 27 , 2011

, for an exemption pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109 for service between

the Uni ted States and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay via a code

- share agreement with

American Airlines

.

There were no objections to the proposed service by any of the carriers served.

We respectfully re quest expedited approval of the exemption application

.

Re spectfully submitted

,

David M. Kirstein

cc: Service List

Docket OST

- 2011

- 0195Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document by email on the

following persons:

carl.nelson@aa.com

rpommer@a tlas air .com

matwood@cozen.com

kevin

. montgomery@pol ar aircargo.com

anita

. mosner@hklaw.com

oracio.marquez@united.com

dan.weiss@coair.com

t homas.bolling@united.com

sascha.vanderbellen@ delta .com

cefelts @fedex.com

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com

benjamin.slocum @usairways.com

howard.kass@usairways.com

mlbenge@zsrlaw.com

brian.hedberg@dot.gov

urskr@state.gov

Lyndsey Grunewald

November 1, 2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Lassen Resource Advisory Committee, Susanville, California, USDA Forest Service.

# ACTION:

Notice of meetings. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committees Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Lassen National Forest's Lassen County Resource Advisory Committee will meet Wednesday, November 10th and Friday, November 12th in Susanville, California for a business meeting. The meetings are open to the public.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The business meetings on November 10th and 12th will begin at 9 a.m., at the Lassen National Forest Headquarters Office, Caribou Conference Room 2550 Riverside Drive, Susanville, CA 96130. These meetings will be dedicated to hearing presentations from project proponents for funding through the “Secure Rural Schools and Self Determination Act of 2000,” commonly known as Payments to States. Time will also be set aside for public comments at the beginning of the meeting.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert Andrews, District Ranger, Designated Federal Officer, at (530) 257-4188; or Public Affairs Officer, Heidi Perry, at (530) 252-6605.

Jeff Withroe,

Acting Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 04-23923 Filed 10-25-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
U.S. Air Force Fact Sheet            DESERT HAWK SMALL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT                   SYSTEM                  Mission The Desert Hawk                   Small Unmanned Aircraft System or UAS provides real-time                   overhead video imagery for Air Force security forces providing                   force protection, air base defense and convoy protection.                   Desert Hawk is part of the integrated base defense system.                   Features The Desert Hawk UAS                   features six air vehicles or AVs, a ground control station,                   remote video terminal, day-night camera capability,                   transportation cases, launch equipment and ground spares and                   equipment. A two-person crew using a bungee-cord catapult                   system launches the Desert Hawk. Desert Hawk can be                   autonomously flown using a laptop computer with dynamic                   re-tasking and on-demand manual steering override. A                   two-bladed propeller driven by an electric motor powers the                   Desert Hawk. Background Developed                   by Lockheed Martin, Desert Hawk's original concept was to                   provide a ring of protection around air bases at forward                   locations for Air Force security forces. In July 2002, systems                   were delivered to the Air Force as part of the Force                   Protection Airborne Surveillance System requirement.                   Desert Hawk was rapidly fielded to support security                   forces deployed in U. S. Central Command's area of operations.                   It has proven its worth supporting not only Air Force assets                   but also Army forces involved in convoy protection and base                   defense. General Characteristics                   Primary Function: Real-time force                   protection and reconnaissance, and perimeter assessment                   Contractor: Lockheed Martin                   Power Plant: Electric motor, rechargeable                   lithium ion batteries Wingspan: 4.3 feet                   (1.31 meters) Length: 2 feet 10 in (.8                   meters) Weight: (aerial vehicle) 7 lbs                   (3.2 kilograms)Speed: 35-55 mph (30-48                   knots) Operating Altitude: 200-1000 ft                   air ground level (AGL) (60-300meters) Initial                   Operating Capability: 2002 System                   Cost: approximately $224,000 (2004 dollars)                   Payload: High resolution, day/night                   camera and thermal imager Inventory:                   ClassifiedPoint of                   ContactAir Force Special Operations Command, Public                   Affairs Office; 229 Cody Ave.; Hurlburt Field, Fla.                   32544-5273; DSN 579-5515 or 850-884-5515.November 2007
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports datedMarch 11, 2008, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of BUCA, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2007. We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of BUCA, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-78295 effective May 12, 1999, No. 333-48154 effective October 18, 2000, No. 333-48156effective October 18, 2000, No. 333-65130 effective July 13, 2001, No. 333-83818 effective March 6, 2002, No. 333-99385 effective September 10, 2002, No. 333-13738 effective March 19, 2004 andNo. 333-136549 effective August 11, 2006). 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

Minneapolis, Minnesota 

March 11, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1998
<CASH>                                          11,563
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,520
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (334)
<INVENTORY>                                     11,187
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,546
<PP&E>                                          25,556
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (10,536)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,868
<BONDS>                                        110,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           16,148
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,464
<OTHER-SE>                                    (111,954)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,837
<SALES>                                         90,228
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,228
<CGS>                                           62,917
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,917
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (27,424)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (240)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,408
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,761)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,818)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,943)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,943)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Dora Pines, Respondent, v. Sadie Novick and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Eagle Savings and Loan Company, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 3.)

The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Appeal from so much of the order as denies motion to vacate judgment and for reargument of motion to open default dismissed, without costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.
## APPENDIX C **AREA SOURCES Bureau of Air Quality**  **Department of Environmental Protection**This page blank for cop ying purposes.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of eMagin Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Campbell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











October 7, 2011
By:
/s/ Paul CampbellPaul CampbellChief Financial Officer(Chief Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification**I, Peter S. Atkinson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s latest fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.August 2, 2007          /s/ Peter S. Atkinson   Peter S. Atkinson   Chief Financial Officer