alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-98-14 February 12, 1998

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC, U.S. ENRICHMENT CORP. OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS

APPARENT VIOLATIONS AT PORTSMOUTH PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet Thursday,

February 19, with representatives of the U.S. Enrichment

Corporation for a predecisional enforcement conference on

apparent violations at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant,

located in Piketon, Ohio.

The meeting will start at 1:00 p.m. (CT) in the Third Floor

Conference Room of the NRC Region III Office, 801 Warrenville

Road, Lisle, Illinois. It is open to public observation. NRC

officials will be available at the conclusion to answer questions

from the news media and other interested observers.

U.S. Enrichment Corporation operates the Portsmouth plant

under a lease from the Department of Energy, the owner and

previous operator. Effective March of last year, regulatory

authority over plant operations was transferred from the

Department of Energy to the NRC. The facility uses a gaseous

diffusion process to enrich uranium hexafluoride in the uranium235 isotope, so that the material can be used as nuclear fuel in

civilian nuclear power plants.

The discussion will focus on the corporation’s apparent weak

implementation of the nuclear criticality safety program at the

plant. This program establishes controls to ensure that, during

operations, uranium remains subcritical--that is, it minimizes

the chance of an accidental chain reaction.

During an inspection in December and January, NRC inspectors

found program inadequacies that included training, root cause

evaluations and corrective actions. In addition, the inspectors

noted an apparent failure by plant staff to implement all the

required controls for a non-operating cell that contained a

deposit of enriched uranium greater than the minimum safe amount.

The decision to hold an enforcement conference does not mean

the NRC has determined that a violation has occurred or that

enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to

discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety
significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point out

any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report;

and to enable the company to outline its proposed corrective

actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated

enforcement action, such as a fine, will be made at this

conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials

at a later date.

####
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23521]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--American Veterinary Medical Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), American Veterinary Medical 
Association (``AVMA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
(1) the name and principal place of business of the standards 
development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards 
development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: American 
Veterinary Medical Association, Schaumburg, IL. The nature and scope of 
AVMA's standards development activities are: to develop, plan, 
establish, and coordinate voluntary consensus standards applicable to 
the advancement of the science and art of veterinary medicine, 
including its relationship to public health, biological science, and 
agriculture. AVMA conducts its standards development activities through 
the following committees: AVMA Council on Education; AVMA Educational 
Commission for Foreign Veterinary Graduates; AVMA Committee on 
Veterinary Technician Education and Activities; and AVMA American Board 
of Veterinary Specialties. These committees conduct standard setting 
activities relating to the certification of foreign veterinarians in 
the United States, the accreditation of foreign veterinarians in the 
United States, the accreditation of veterinary medical and technology 
programs, and the establishment of criteria for recognition of 
veterinary specialty organizations. Through its standard development 
activities, AVMA seeks to advance the science and art of veterinary 
medicine, including its relationship to public health, biological 
science, and agriculture.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23521 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or vld@nrc.gov

I-96-51

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Victor Dricks July 26, 1996

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $2,500 FINE AGAINST SYNCOR INTERNATIONAL

CORPORATION FOR DELIBERATE MISUSE OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a

$2,500 fine against Syncor International Corporation, of

Chatsworth, California, for a violation of its requirements

governing use of radioactive materials at its nuclear pharmacy in

Pittsburgh, PA.

The violation was found during an NRC inspection conducted

after an August 10, 1995 incident in which an individual's lock

and locker in an unrestricted area of the facility were

deliberately contaminated with technetium-99m. The individual,

who did not suffer any adverse health consequences as a result of

the incident, detected the contamination when surveying himself.

In a letter to the licensee, Region I Administrator Thomas T.

Martin said that the NRC has "... concluded that the violation

most likely was deliberate because of the amount of contamination

that was concentrated on the lock and the fact that the only

other contamination at the facility correlated with the

activities of the contaminated individual after his visit to the

locker."

Syncor was cited by the NRC staff in November 1994 for

violating regulations after a worker deliberately sprayed

radioactive material on butterflies at a Syncor facility in

Kansas City, Missouri. Although that individual was terminated,

the company did not take "corporate-wide" action at that time to

inform managers and employees at its other facilities about the

event and of the significance of deliberate misuse of radioactive

material, Mr. Martin said in his letter.

Syncor has 30 days either to pay the proposed fine or to

request in writing that part or all of it be withdrawn. The

company also has 30 days to admit or deny the alleged violations,

and to describe the actions it has taken or plans to take to

prevent recurrence.

***
### §2001. Findings

Congress finds that—

(1) in order to promote energy independence and meet the increasing demand for energy, the United States will require a diversified portfolio of substantially increased quantities of electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuels;

(2) according to the report submitted to Congress by the National Research Council entitled "Charting the Future of Methane Hydrate Research in the United States", the total United States resources of gas hydrates have been estimated to be on the order of 200,000 trillion cubic feet;

(3) according to the report of the National Commission on Energy Policy entitled "Ending the Energy Stalemate—A Bipartisan Strategy to Meet America's Energy Challenge", and dated December 2004, the United States may be endowed with over one-fourth of the methane hydrate deposits in the world;

(4) according to the Energy Information Administration, a shortfall in natural gas supply from conventional and unconventional sources is expected to occur in or about 2020; and

(5) the National Academy of Sciences states that methane hydrate may have the potential to alleviate the projected shortfall in the natural gas supply.

(Pub. L. 106–193, §2, as added Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, §968(a), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 894.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2 of Pub. L. 106–193 was set out in a note under section 1902 of this title prior to the general amendment of Pub. L. 106–193 by Pub. L. 109–58.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 106–193, §1, as added by Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, §968(a), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 894, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Methane Hydrate Research and Development Act of 2000'."

#### Reclassification

Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, §968(b), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 898, provided that: "The Law Revision Counsel shall reclassify the Methane Hydrate Research and Development Act of 2000 (30 U.S.C. 1902 note; Public Law 106–193) to a new chapter at the end of title 30, United States Code."
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Joel Derek Rojo

, * From the 118 th District Court

of Howard County

Trial Court No. 14 690

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 7

- 00 22 7

- CR * August 8 , 2019

The Sta te of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Stretcher , J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.

, Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the

judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
<Page>

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective
Amendment No. 23 to the registration statement on Form N-4 (No. 33-19421) of our
report dated February 15, 2002, relating to the financial statements of Fortis
Benefits Insurance Company, which appears in the Statement of Additional
Information constituting part of Post-Effective Amendment No. 22 to such
registration statement. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our
report dated April 6, 2001, relating to the financial statements of Fortis
Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account D, which appears in such Statement
of Additional Information. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Independent Public Accountants" in such Statement of Additional
Information.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 27, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of
Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Charles I.
Leone,  Acting Chief Financial Officer of U.S. Wireless Data, Inc., hereby certify,  to
my knowledge,  that the quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31,
2004 of U.S.  Wireless  Data,  Inc. (the Form  10-QSB)  fully complies with
the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and
the information  contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly  presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of U.S. Wireless Data, Inc.

|Dated:  March 18, 2005
|----------------------
|                      

---
### §74a–10a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 74a–10a was editorially reclassified as section 5145 of this title.
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

I, D. Bryan Jones, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this AmendmentNo. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F/A of NovamericanSteel Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of thecompany as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The company’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the company and have:

 

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          Disclosed in this report any change in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.             The company’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of thecompany’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: March 23, 2006

 
|   | /s/ *D. Bryan Jones*    |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |                    |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### § 125.24 Failure of designated cartman, lighterman or other bonded carrier to appear.

The cartman, lighterman, other bonded carrier, foreign trade zone operator, bonded warehouse proprietor, container station operator or centralized examination station operator designated to convey the merchandise shall be present to take the merchandise when the Customs officer in charge is ready to send it. If the designated vehicle or lighter is not present, after waiting a reasonable time, such officer shall send the merchandise by any available licensed cartman, lighterman, or qualifying bonded carrier.

[T.D. 94-81, 59 FR 51496, Oct. 12, 1994]
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-98-21 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Thursday, March

19, 1998)

NRC STAFF TO HOLD MARCH 31 ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE WITH FP&L

TO DISCUSS SECURITY CONCERNS AT ST.LUCIE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a

predecisional enforcement conference in Atlanta on March 31 with

Florida power & Light Company to discuss security concerns related to

access controls at the St. Lucie nuclear power plant, located near Ft.

Pierce, Florida.

The conference, which is open to observation by the public and

the press, will be held from 1:30 until 3:30 p.m. at the NRC Region II

offices, located on the 24th floor of the Atlanta Federal Center at

61 Forsyth Street, S.W. The meeting is between the NRC and FP&L, but

NRC officials will be available at its conclusion to answer questions

from interested observers.

NRC officials will discuss with FP&L the circumstances

associated with an access control event at St. Lucie which occurred on

January 2 of this year. A contract employee was favorably terminated

two days earlier on December 31 but was not notified. The individual

entered the plant’s protected area January 2, immediately notified of

the termination, and exited the area eight minutes later. Upon review

of termination request records, company personnel determined that two

of 21 individuals terminated December 31 had not had their badges

pulled, but the second individual did not return to the site.

No problems occurred, but the company determined that both

individuals had potential protected and vital area access for two days

following their termination.

FP&L has initiated procedures to preclude recurrence of such

events.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does

not mean that a determination has been made that a violation has

occurred or that enforcement action will the taken. The purpose of

the conferences is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and

safety significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to point
our any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report;

and to enable the licensee to outline proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated

enforcement action, such as a civil penalty, will be made at these

conferences. Those decisions will be made later by senior NRC

officials.

#
§ 123.12 Entry of foreign locomotives and equipment in international traffic. ( a ) *Use on a continuous route.* Foreign locomotives or other foreign railroad equipment in use on a continuous route crossing the boundary into the United States shall be admitted without formal entry or the payment of duty to proceed to the end of the run and depart for a foreign country, in accordance with the following: ( 1 ) *On inward trip.* Unless formally entered and cleared through Customs into the United States, or unless exempt from entry as provided in § 141.4(b)(4) of this chapter, a foreign locomotive shall be used on the inward trip only in connection with taking the inbound train to the last place in a continuous haul, including the switching of cars which it has hauled into the United States. Other foreign railroad equipment may proceed to the place of complete unloading for any merchandise imported therein.
( 2 ) *On outward trip.* Unless formally entered and cleared through Customs into the United States, or unless exempt from entry as provided in § 141.4(b)(4) of this chapter, foreign locomotives may be used on the outward trip only in connection with through trains crossing the boundary, including switching to make up such trains. Other foreign railroad equipment may be used in such trains or for such local traffic as is reasonably incidental to its economical and prompt departure for a foreign country.
( b ) *Admission of empty equipment.* Empty foreign railroad equipment shall be admitted to the United States without formal entry and payment of duty only if: ( 1 ) The passengers or goods to be loaded are to be transported directly to or through a foreign country; or
( 2 ) The equipment is exempt from entry as provided in § 141.4(b)(4) of this chapter.
( c ) *Penalty for improper use.* The use of any foreign locomotive and other foreign railroad equipment in violation of this section may result in liabilities being incurred under section 592, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1592).
( d ) *Domestic and foreign locomotives and other railroad equipment defined.* For the purpose of this section and § 123.13, locomotives or other railroad equipment manufactured in, or regularly imported into, the United States, shall be considered “domestic” if not subsequently formally entered and cleared through foreign customs into another country, nor used in foreign local traffic otherwise than as an incident of the return of the equipment to the United States. Other locomotives and railroad equipment shall be considered “foreign”.
[T.D. 70-121, 35 FR 8215, May 26, 1970, as amended by T.D. 73-73, 38 FR 6991, Mar. 15, 1973; T.D. 79-160, 44 FR 31956, June 4, 1979; T.D. 83-118, 48 FR 23385, May 25, 1983; T.D. 94-51, 59 FR 30294, June 13, 1994]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23672]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Intent to Request Renewal From the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) of One New Public Collection of Information

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 
et seq.), the FAA invites the public comment on one public information 
collection which will be submitted to OMB for renewal.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 21, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed or delivered to the FAA at the 
following address: Ms. Judy Street, Room 613, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Standards and Information Division, APF-100, 800 
Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Judy Street at the above address 
or on (202) 267-9895.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. Therefore, the FAA solicits 
comments on the following collection of information in order to 
evaluate the necessity of the collection, the accuracy of the agency's 
estimate of the burden, the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected, and possible ways to minimize the burden 
of the collection in preparation for submission to renew the clearance 
of the following information collection.
    1. 2120-XXXX, National Assessment of General Aviation Single Engine 
Land Pilots. The Civil Aerospace Medical Institute (CAMI) will collect 
the information on behalf of the Federal Aviation Administration's 
(FAA) Flight Standards (AFS) organization. Newly certified general 
aviation (GA) Airplane Single-Engine Land (ASEL) pilots within the 
United States will receive an anonymous and voluntary survey to 
complete and return by mail. The information collected will be used to 
assess pilots' experiences during the certification process. CAMI will 
be responsible for the logistical details associated with mailing out 
surveys and collecting and processing the responses. The current 
estimated annual reporting burden is 6,250 hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC on October 15, 2004.
Judith D. Street,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, APF-100.
[FR Doc. 04-23672 Filed 10-21-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M