alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(a)

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael J. Kneeland, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of United Rentals, Inc. and United Rentals (North America), Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2011;
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|April 16, 2012         
|                       
|/s/ MICHAEL J. KNEELAND
|Michael J. Kneeland    
|Chief Executive Officer
§ 1200.3 How the Board members make decisions. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 72960 , Sept. 9, 2024.
( a ) The three Board members make decisions in all cases by majority vote except in circumstances described in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section or as otherwise provided by law.
( b ) When due to a vacancy, recusal or other reasons, the Board members are unable to decide any case by majority vote, the decision, recommendation or order under review shall be deemed the final decision or order of the Board. The Chairman of the Board may direct the issuance of an order consistent with this paragraph.
( c ) When due to a vacancy, recusal or other reasons, the Board members are unable to decide a matter in a case which does not involve a decision, recommendation or order, the Chairman may direct referral of the matter to an administrative judge or other official for final disposition.
( d ) Decisions and orders issued pursuant to paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section shall not be precedential.
( e ) This section applies only when at least two Board members are in office.
[59 FR 39937, Aug. 5, 1994]
#### § 190.93 Combined applications.

An applicant for the procedures provided for in §§ 190.91 and 190.92 may apply for only one procedure, both procedures separately, or both procedures in one application package (*see* also § 190.195 regarding combined applications for certification in the drawback compliance program and waiver of prior notice and/or approval of accelerated payment of drawback). In the latter instance, the intent to apply for both procedures must be clearly stated. In all instances, all of the requirements for the procedure(s) applied for must be met (for example, in a combined application for both procedures, all of the information required for each procedure, all required sample documents for each procedure, and all required certifications must be included in and with the application).
EXHIBIT 11


                  PRIME MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     COMPUTATION OF THE NET INCOME PER SHARE
                FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND 1996
                                   (Unaudited)

(In thousands, net income per share
in dollars)

                                        Primary        Fully diluted
                                        earnings          earnings
                                       per share          per share

1997
----
Net income applicable to 
  common stock                      $         3,670   $         3,670
                                    ===============   ===============


Average number of shares 
  issued & outstanding                       19,277            19,277
Average stock option shares                     237               240
                                    ---------------   ---------------

   Shares for earnings calculation           19,514            19,517
                                    ===============   ===============


Net income per share                $          0.19   $          0.19
                                    ===============   ===============


1996
----
Net income applicable to 
  common stock                      $          (353)  $          (353)
                                    ===============   ===============


Average number of shares 
  issued & outstanding                       17,597            17,597
Average stock option and 
  warrant shares                              1,155             1,545
                                    ---------------   ---------------

   Shares for earnings calculation           18,752            19,142
                                    ===============   ===============


Net income per share                $         (0.02)  $         (0.02)
                                    ===============   ===============


NOTE:
Primary and fully diluted  income (loss) per share were computed by dividing net
income (loss) by the average number of shares  outstanding plus the common stock
equivalents, which would arise from the exercise of dilutive stock options.






<PAGE>
#### § 146.14 Retail trade within a zone.

Retail trade is prohibited within a zone except as provided in 19 U.S.C. 81o(d). See also the regulations of the Board as contained in 15 CFR part 400.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-052 August 19, 2002

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

PRE-HEARING CONFERENCE SCHEDULED ON

IP2 LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will hold a pre-hearing

conference on Tuesday, August 27 in Rye Brook, N.Y., in a proceeding involving an application to

amend the license of the Indian Point 2 nuclear power plant in Buchanan, N.Y.

Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, which operates the reactor, has requested a license amendment

for a one-time five-year extension of the period within which to conduct the containment integrated

leak rate test. It would normally be required every ten years. 

Riverkeeper, Inc., submitted a petition to intervene on March 18, 2002. Because Riverkeeper

did not meet the deadline (September 21, 2001) for filing a petition for leave to intervene, the

Licensing Board will be considering whether there was good cause for the late filing, along with the

other legal issues involved: Riverkeeper’s legal standing to participate and the admissibility of its

contentions. 

The conference is open to public observation. It will be held at the Hilton Rye Town, 699

Westchester Ave., in Rye Brook. It is scheduled from 9:00 a.m. until 1:00 p.m. The Licensing Board

consists of three administrative judges: a lawyer, Chairman, Michael C. Farrar, and two scientist

members, Dr. Richard F. Cole and Dr. Charles N. Kelber. 

The license amendment was granted by the NRC staff on August 5. NRC regulations allow the

issuance of amendments that the staff believes involve no significant hazards considerations prior to

the conduct, but subject to the outcome of, any associated hearings. Consistent with the agency’s

normal practices, the amendment was issued at the completion of the NRC staff’s review of the

licensee’s amendment request. If the Board grants a hearing, and then decides in favor of the

petitioners, the amendment could be revoked. In that event, the licensee would be required to perform

the test within the time frame established pursuant to the decision.

###
###### Editorial Note on Part 351

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 351

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 89 FR 20832, Mar. 25, 2024.

#### § 351.603 Complaint of price-undercutting by subsidized imports.

Upon receipt of a complaint filed with the Secretary of Agriculture under section 702(b) of the Trade Agreements Act concerning price-undercutting by subsidized imports, the Secretary will promptly determine, under section 702(a)(3) of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, whether or not the alleged subsidies are included in or should be added to the latest annual list or quarterly update.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1505 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1505

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2127 Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, North Carolina, as the ``Jim 
                       Richardson Post Office''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1505

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2127 Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, North Carolina, as the ``Jim 
                       Richardson Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2127 
Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, North Carolina, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Jim Richardson Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jim Richardson Post 
Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 31, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
### §74a–11. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 74a–11 was editorially reclassified as section 5105 of this title.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1402

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located

States Courthouse’’.‘‘Reynaldo G. Garza and Filemon B. Vela Unitedson Street in Brownsville, Texas, as theat the corner of Seventh Street and East Jack-

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1402

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located at the

corner of Seventh Street and East Jackson Street in

Brownsville, Texas, as the ‘‘Reynaldo G. Garza and

Filemon B. Vela United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1402 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States courthouse located at the corner

3 of Seventh Street and East Jackson Street in Brownsville,

4 Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Reynaldo

5 G. Garza and Filemon B. Vela United States Court6 house’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

10 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

11 to be a reference to the ‘‘Reynaldo G. Garza and Filemon

12 B. Vela United States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 29,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0137 - Litigation Report - 2003  - 02

Accession Number: ML032110327

Date Released: Friday, August 22, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML032190232 - SECY-03-0137 - Litigation Report - 2003 - 02 (3 page(s), 8/11/2003)
    - ML031990027 - Petition for Review of an Order of the NRC, dated July 7, 2003. (2 page(s), 7/7/2003)
    - ML032180678 - Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Petition for Review Granted ( Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone, No. 03-4372) dated 06/11/03. (1 page(s), 6/11/2003)
    - ML031630996 - Order Dismissing the Case, dated 06/02/2003. (4 page(s), 6/2/2003)
    - ML032180711 - Memorandum Opinion (Khoury No. DKC-2002-3511) dated June 23, 2003. (29 page(s), 6/23/2003)
    - ML032180719 - Petition for Review of the Northern California Power Agency (No. 03-1184) dated 07/01/03. (2 page(s), 7/1/2003)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 1201.132 Final decisions. ( a ) In any Special Counsel complaint seeking corrective action based on an allegation that a prohibited personnel practice has been committed, the judge, or the Board on petition for review, may order appropriate corrective action. 5 U.S.C. 1214(b)(4)(A).
( b ) ( 1 ) Subject to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section, in any case involving an alleged prohibited personnel practice described in 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(8) or 2302(b)(9)(A)(i), (B), (C), or (D), the judge, or the Board on petition for review, will order appropriate corrective action if the Special Counsel demonstrates that a disclosure or protected activity described under 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(8) or 2302(b)(9)(A)(i), (B), (C), or (D) was a contributing factor in the personnel action that was taken or will be taken against the individual.
( 2 ) Corrective action under paragraph (b)(1) of this section may not be ordered if the agency demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that it would have taken the same personnel action in the absence of such disclosure or protected activity. 5 U.S.C. 1214(b)(4)(B).
[62 FR 48451, Sept. 16, 1997, as amended at 78 FR 39545, July 2, 2013]
### §64–3. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 95–26, title I, §111, May 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 87; Pub. L. 108–7, div. H, title I, §1018(h)(3), Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 369, which related to reimbursement for Capitol Police salaries paid by Capitol Police for service at Federal Law Enforcement Training Center, was transferred to section 1905a of this title.
#### S. Albert Lowenstein v. Lulu Koch.

Motion for leave to appeal granted; question certified. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-018 February 20, 2001

NRC TO HOLD WORKSHOP MARCH 26-28 ON INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION

OF THE REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public workshop March 26 - 28 in

Gaithersburg, Maryland, to discuss lessons learned from the first year of implementing the agency’s

new reactor oversight process.

The workshop will be held at the Gaithersburg Hilton Hotel, 620 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg,

Md. The plenary session will be from 10:00 a.m. till noon on March 26. Workshop sessions will be

from 1:00 to 5:00 p.m. on March 26; 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on March 27; and 8:00 a.m. till noon on

March 28. The closing plenary session will be from 1:00 to 3:30 p.m. on March 28.

Interested individuals can pre-register for the workshop on line at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ROP/workshop.html on NRC’s web site. On-site registration will

be from 8:00 to 10:00 a.m. on March 26.

Members of the public, the media, and representatives from state, industry and public interest

groups are expected to participate in discussions, providing their views on the reactor oversight

process, initially implemented industry-wide last April.

Preliminary topics include issues with selected nuclear power plant performance indicators,

assessing maintenance effectiveness, conducting problem identification and resolution inspections,

evaluating cross-cutting areas, potential changes to the assessment process, issues associated with the

occupational radiation safety cornerstones, and communication of inspection results. NRC plans to

post a final agenda on the NRC web site ten days prior to the workshop.

Workshop participants should be familiar with the reactor oversight process in order to

facilitate their participation. The NRC web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/index.html

provides useful information related to performance indicators, inspection findings and reports, and the

new processes and procedures. Any questions about the workshop should be directed to August

Spector at (301) 415-2140 or email: AKS@NRC.GOV.

###
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00106

- CV

PETROLEUM ASSET

MANAGEMENT CORPORATI ON APPELLANT

V.

JUVENTAS, LLC, SKYEV IL

INVESTMENTS, LLP, AN D BRIAN

GRONA APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 67TH DISTRI CT COURT OF TA RRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered appellant 's “ Agreed Motion To Dismiss Appeal .” It is

the court ’ s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2 ), 43.2(f).

1 See T ex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same , for which

let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: June 2 6 , 2014
§ 165.16 Referrals to Department of Commerce. ( a ) *When required.* A referral is required if at any point after receipt of an allegation, CBP cannot determine whether the merchandise described in an allegation is properly within the scope of an antidumping or countervailing duty order.
( b ) *Referral.* The referral may contain any necessary information available to CBP regarding whether the merchandise described in an allegation is subject to the relevant AD/CVD orders.
( c ) *Notice of referral.* TRLED will promptly notify the parties to the investigation of the date of the referral.
( d ) *Effect on investigation.* The time period required for any referral and determination by the Department of Commerce will not be counted toward the deadlines for CBP to decide on whether to initiate an investigation under § 165.15, whether to take interim measures under § 165.24, or the deadline to issue a determination as to evasion under § 165.27.
( e ) *Notice of decision.* CBP will place the determination by the Department of Commerce on the administrative record of CBP's proceeding and will electronically notify the parties to the investigation.
[81 FR 56482, Aug. 22, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 19260, Mar. 18, 2024]
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 4 A1 09 1 . J OHNSON v . RYALL.

Up o n co ns i d erat i on o f t h e Ap p el l an t ’ s M o t i o n to W i t hd raw Ap p eal i n t h e

ab o ve s t y l ed c as e, p urs u an t t o Co u rt o f A p p eal s Ru l e 4 1 (g ), i t i s o rd ered t h at t h e

m o ti o n i s h ereb y GRANTED, an d ju ri s di ct i o n i s rel eas ed back t o t h e t ri al co u rt u p o n

recei p t o f t hi s o rd er.

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O ffic e

, A t la n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I c e r t ify t ha t t h e a b o v e is a t

r u e e x t r a c t fr o m

t h e m in u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A pp e a ls o f G e o r g ia

.

W it n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a ffix e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r la s t a b o v e w r

it t e n

.

, C le r

k

. 

## September 30, 2024

09/30/2024
### §80a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 80a was editorially reclassified as section 4560 of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3632] 

In accordance with a notice received from the Department of Homeland Security—Federal Emergency Management Agency—effective October 19, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to include Elk and Potter Counties as disaster areas due to damages caused by Tropical Depression Ivan occurring on September 17, 2004, and continuing through October 1, 2004. 

In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small businesses located in the contiguous county of Allegany in the State of New York may be filed until the specified date at the previously designated location. All other counties contiguous to the above named primary counties have previously been declared. 

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.*, the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is November 18, 2004, and for economic injury the deadline is June 20, 2005.                 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008). 

Dated: October 20, 2004. 

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 04-23959 Filed 10-25-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
VOC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 EngineRun 0Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4Run 5 Run 6Run 7 Run 8Run 9 Run 10 Engine 1 2.048 1.729 1.376 Engine 2 1.877 1.531 1.079 Engine 3 1.95 1.472 1.179 Engine 4 1.834 1.043 0.922 Confidence68 95 99.7 Engine 5 1.829 1.35 1.321 AverageStd Dev 1 2 3 Engine 6 1.65 1.543 1.091 Low 1.81 0.154 1.96 2.12 2.27 Engine 7 1.588 1.042 0.916 Med+High 1.24 0.245 1.49 1.73 1.80 Engine 8 1.71 1.296 1.006 Average 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.24 1.24 1.24 1.24 1.24 1.24 1.24 1 Std Dev 1.96 1.96 1.96 1.96 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 2 Std Dev 2.12 2.12 2.12 2.12 1.73 1.73 1.73 1.73 1.73 1.73 1.73 BACT-proposed2.15 2.15 2.15 2.15 2.15 2.15 2.15 2.15 2.15 2.15 2.15 Permit 2.15 2.15 2.15 2.15 2.15 2.15 2.15 1.73 1.73 1.73 1.73 Ave+15% 2.08 2.08 2.08 2.08 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.43

1.81

1.24 1.24 1.96

1.49 1.49 2.12

1.73 1.73 2.15 2.15

1.73 2.08

0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 g/kW-hr 

# VOC Scatter Plot-Stack Testing Results

Engine 1 Engine 2 Engine 3 Engine 4 Engine 5 Engine 6 Engine 7 Engine 8 Average 1 Std Dev 2 Std Dev BACT-proposed Permit Ave+15% 

## Low(30%) Med(45%) High(60%)