alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0679 SAT Date: 7/16/2013 Print Date: 9/3/2014

Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 2 Health: PMN ; Eco: intact material; significant mitigation of toxicity exp e i.e.,~12x 2 3 Health: Eco: high concern for toxicity of incomplete incinera t p roducts to terrestrial organisms
Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 3 1 1 PMN 3 2 2 Deg Pdt

Exposure Based Review : Health: Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Inhalation For Drinking water and inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: LUNG OVERLOAD; LUNG Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0679

S = Disp. VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E)H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90-99 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong PBT Potential: PMN P3B1; Deg Pdt P3B2 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes ( p che m ). Concern for lung toxicity if inhaled based on lung overload for high molecular weight polymers and lung toxicity from cationic binding to lung membranes.
For the potential incomplete incineration product, based on test data for concerns are liver toxicity, blood toxicity, and male reproductive toxicity [rat 28-day oral N OAEL = 50 mg/kg, LOAEL = 150 mg/kg with liver toxicity; rat 90-day oral LOAEL = 10 mg/kg based on decreased body weight in males at all doses and liver toxicity and anemia at 200 mg/kg; there were toxic effects on the testes in 2 males in the 90-day oral study that were judged by the reviewer to be indicative of the potential for male reproductive toxicity. There is also concern for immunosuppression and oncogenicity based on data for

Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 6.3 daphnid 48-h LC50 60 green algal 96-h EC50 5.1 fish

_ chronic value 0.35 daphnid

_ chronic value 4.3
algal

_ chronic value 1.5
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for polycationic polymers with
= dispersible in water at 25 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;
high concern for toxicity of incomplete incineration products to terrestrial organisms

Factors Values CommentsAssessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 420 with mitigation

SARs p olycationic polymers SAR Class p olyme r -cationicEcotox Category Polycationic Polymers
Ecotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
FOURTH AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                                   E-REX, INC.
                               2002 NON-QUALIFIED
                           STOCK GRANT AND OPTION PLAN


     This  Fourth  Amendment  to  E-Rex, Inc. 2002 Non-Qualified Stock Grant and
Option  Plan  (the  "Amendment")  is  executed effective this 8th day of January
2003.

                                    RECITALS

     WHEREAS,  E-Rex,  Inc.,  a  Nevada corporation (the "Company") executed the
E-Rex,  Inc.  2002 Non-Qualified Stock Grant and Option Plan effective August 5,
2002  (the  "Plan");

     WHEREAS,  the  Plan  provided  for up to 13,500,000 shares of the Company's
common  stock  to  be  issued  pursuant  to  the  terms  of  the  Plan;

     WHEREAS,  the  Company  executed  the First Amendment to the Plan effective
September 24, 2002 increasing the number of shares of the Company's common stock
to  be  issued  pursuant  to  the  Plan  from  13,500,000  to  33,500,000;

     WHEREAS,  the  Company  executed the Second Amendment to the Plan effective
October  25,  2002 increasing the number of shares of the Company's common stock
to  be  issued  pursuant  to  the  Plan  from  33,500,000  to  48,500,000;

     WHEREAS,  the  Company  executed  the Third Amendment to the Plan effective
December  11, 2002 increasing the number of shares of the Company's common stock
to  be  issued  pursuant  to  the  Plan  from  48,500,000  to  68,500,000;

     WHEREAS,  Section  7  of  the Plan provides that the Board of Directors may
revise  or  amend  the  Plan  at  any  time;

     WHEREAS, on the date hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company approved
this  Amendment  to  the  Plan.

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  the  Plan  is  hereby  amended  as  follows:

     1.  Section  4  of the Plan is restated in its entirety to read as follows:

     "4.     IDENTIFICATION  OF  STOCK:  The  stock  subject  to  grant  and the
             -------------------------
     options  shall  be  shares  of the Corporation's authorized but unissued or
     acquired  or  reacquired  Common Stock, par value $0.001 (the "Stock"). The
     aggregate  number  of shares subject to grant and outstanding options shall
     not exceed 88,500,000 shares of Stock (subject to adjustment as provided in
     Section 5.6). If any option granted hereunder shall expire or terminate for
     any  reason  without  having been exercised in full, the unpurchased shares
     subject  thereto  shall  again  be  available  for  purposes of this Plan."

     As  adopted  by  the  Board  of  Directors  on  January  8,  2003.

                              E-Rex,  Inc.,
                              a  Nevada  corporation


                              /s/ Carl Dilley
                              --------------------------
                              By:     Carl  Dilley
                              Its:     President
### §95–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 95–1 was editorially reclassified as section 5505 of this title.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone 301/415-820

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-067 May 27, 2003

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET JUNE 12-13 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards

(ACRS) will hold a meeting on June 12 and 13 in Rockville, Md. The committee will discuss,

among other items, collective understanding and attributes of the “safety culture” within the

nuclear industry.

The meeting, a portion of which will be closed to the public to discuss safeguards

information, will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at

11545 Rockville Pike. It will begin at 8:30 a.m. each day. A complete agenda is available on the

NRC’s Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2003/ .

For additional information, please contact Dr. Sher Bahadur, at 301-415-0138.

###
### §182. Cooperative Acquisitions Program Revolving Fund

#### (a) Establishment

Effective October 1, 1997, there is established in the Treasury of the United States a revolving fund to be known as the Cooperative Acquisitions Program Revolving Fund (in this section referred to as the "revolving fund"). Moneys in the revolving fund shall be available to the Librarian of Congress, without fiscal year limitation, for financing the cooperative acquisitions program (in this section referred to as the "program") under which the Library acquires foreign publications and research materials on behalf of participating institutions on a cost-recovery basis. Obligations under the revolving fund are limited to amounts specified in the appropriations Act for that purpose for any fiscal year.

#### (b) Amounts deposited

The revolving fund shall consist of—

(1) any amounts appropriated by law for the purposes of the revolving fund;

(2) any amounts held by the Librarian as of October 1, 1997 or October 7, 1997, whichever is later, that were collected as payment for the Library's indirect costs of the program; and

(3) the difference between (A) the total value of the supplies, equipment, gift fund balances, and other assets of the program, and (B) the total value of the liabilities (including unfunded liabilities such as the value of accrued annual leave of employees) of the program.

#### (c) Credits to revolving fund

The revolving fund shall be credited with all advances and amounts received as payment for purchases under the program and services and supplies furnished to program participants, at rates estimated by the Librarian to be adequate to recover the full direct and indirect costs of the program to the Library over a reasonable period of time.

#### (d) Unobligated balances

Any unobligated and unexpended balances in the revolving fund that the Librarian determines to be in excess of amounts needed for activities financed by the revolving fund, shall be deposited in the Treasury of the United States as miscellaneous receipts. Amounts needed for activities financed by the revolving fund means the direct and indirect costs of the program, including the costs of purchasing, shipping, binding of books and other library materials; supplies, materials, equipment and services needed in support of the program; salaries and benefits; general overhead; and travel.

#### (e) Audit

The revolving fund shall be subject to audit by the Comptroller General at the Comptroller General's discretion.

(Pub. L. 105–55, title II, §207, Oct. 7, 1997, 111 Stat. 1193; Pub. L. 110–161, div. H, title I, §1403, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2247.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2007—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 110–161 amended heading and text of subsec. (e) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Not later than March 31 of each year, the Librarian of Congress shall prepare and submit to Congress an audited financial statement for the revolving fund for the preceding fiscal year. The audit shall be conducted in accordance with Government Auditing Standards for financial audits issued by the Comptroller General of the United States."
### §293. Duties of Secretary of the Interior

The Secretary of the Interior is hereby authorized to perform any and all acts and to make such rules and regulations as may be necessary and proper for the purpose of carrying this chapter into full force and effect.

(June 8, 1926, ch. 503, §3, 44 Stat. 710.)
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

__________________

_________ No. 02

- 22

- 00005

- CR

________________

_ __________

On Appeal from the 297th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 0644657A

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Walker, JJ. M emorandum Opinion by Justice Walker 

### I RA 

### H ENRY 

### III , Appellant

V



### . T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM OPINION In March 2021, a ppellant Ir a Henry III filed document s in the trial court that
seemed to seek a judgment nunc pro tunc “ to have this judgment and senten c e corrected, finding cleri [c]al mista kes in the judgment ” ; an “ Appeal From Judgment ” ; and postconvict

ion r elief. T he document s w ere filed in this court in January 2022. We questioned our jurisdiction on three ba ses: ( 1) the re was no appealable
order ba s ed on a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc filed in the tr ial court; (2) we have no jurisdiction over postconviction re lief; and (3) any a ttempted appeal from his
1998 co nviction would be untimely in 2022 an d, presumably, precluded by our prior
review of h i s 1998 convi ction

. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a); Abbott v. State , 271 S .W.3d 694, 696 (Tex. Crim. Ap p. 2008); Ater v. Eighth C t. of App. , 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (orig. proceeding ) ; Henry v. State , No. 02

- 98

- 00297

- CR (Tex. App.

— Fort Wor t h Oct. 2 8, 1999 , no pet. ) (not designated for publication)

. We r ecognize d,
however , that we could have (1) mandamus jurisdiction to consider a complaint about
the tr ial court ’ s failure to rule on a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc or about the
trial cou r t ’ s denial of such a motion or (2) a ppellate jurisdiction to determine a timely
ap peal from a judgment nunc pro tun c . See Blanton v. State , 369 S.W.3d 894, 904 (Tex. Crim. App. 20 12); Ex parte Florence , 319 S.W.3d 695, 696 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010); Ex
part e Ybarra , 149 S.W.3d 147, 148

– 49 (Tex . Crim. App. 2004). W e invit ed Henry to respond and warned that w e could dismiss his appeal if h e did not show grounds for our jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3.3

Henry responded that his document s h ad not been an appeal but had been

at tempt s to m ove for a j udgment nunc pro tunc in the trial court a nd to file a postconviction writ of habe as corpus
. In short, Henry is not attempting to appeal anything to this court at this time. Thus, we dismiss his appeal

. Se e Tex. R. App.
P. 43.2(f). The c lerk of this court shall fo rw ard Henry ’ s d ocuments, which were filed
in this court on January 6, 2022 , to the trial court to be considered as a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc and as a n application for a postconviction wr i t of habeas
corpus. See Tex. Co de C rim. Pr oc. A nn. art. 11.0 7; Tex. R. Ap p. P. 23.

/s/ Brian Walker

B rian Walker Justice
Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Deliv ered : March 24, 2022
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23337]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Career development award applications.
    Date: November 1, 2004.
    Time: 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Eye Institute, Division of Extramural Research, 
5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Anne E. Schaffner, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Research, National Eye 
Institute, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, MSC 9300, Bethesda, MD 
20892-9300, (301) 451-2020, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#60010513200e05094e0e09084e070f16"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b2d3d7c1f2dcd7db9cdcdbda9cd5ddc4">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, 
Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 12, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-23337 Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         873,384
<SECURITIES>                                 2,000,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,866,924
<PP&E>                                         665,480
<DEPRECIATION>                                 174,085
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,622,906
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          337,568
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           406
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,917,864
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,622,906
<SALES>                                        232,585
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               232,585
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  744,750
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (513,965)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (513,965)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (513,965)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (513,965)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.013)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.013)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Hypercom Corporation on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-40457, 333-40459, 333-40461 and
333-40333) of our reports dated July 24, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Hypercom Corporation as
of June 30, 1998 and 1997, and for the years ended June 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996,
which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
September
Editorial Note on Part 356
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 356 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

§ 356.23 Hearing. ( a ) *Scheduling of hearing.* The administrative law judge will schedule the hearing at a reasonable time, date, and place, which will be in Washington, DC, unless the administrative law judge determines otherwise based upon good cause shown, that another location would better serve the interests of justice. In setting the date, the administrative law judge will give due regard to the need for the parties adequately to prepare for the hearing and the importance of expeditiously resolving the matter.
( b ) *Joinder or consolidation.* The administrative law judge may order joinder or consolidation if sanctions are proposed against more than one party or if violations of more than one protective order or disclosure undertaking are alleged if to do so would expedite processing of the cases and not adversely affect the interests of the parties.
( c ) *Hearing procedures.* Hearings will be conducted in a fair and impartial manner by the administrative law judge, who may limit attendance at any hearing or portion thereof if necessary or advisable in order to protect proprietary information from improper disclosure. The rules of evidence prevailing in courts of law shall not apply, and all evidentiary material the administrative law judge determines to be relevant and material to the proceeding and not unduly repetitious may be received into evidence and given appropriate weight. The administrative law judge may make such orders and determinations regarding the admissibility of evidence, conduct of examination and cross-examination, and similar matters as are necessary or appropriate to ensure orderliness in the proceedings. The administrative law judge will ensure that a record of the hearing will be taken by reporter or by electronic recording, and will order such part of the record to be sealed as is necessary to protect proprietary information.
( d ) *Rights of parties.* At a hearing each party shall have the right to: ( 1 ) Introduce and examine witnesses and submit physical evidence;
( 2 ) Confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses;
( 3 ) Present oral argument; and
( 4 ) Receive a transcript or recording of the proceedings, upon request, subject to the administrative law judge's orders regarding sealing the record.
( e ) *Representation.* Each charged or affected party has a right to represent himself or herself or to retain private counsel for that purpose. The Chief Counsel will represent the Department, unless the General Counsel of the Department determines otherwise. The administrative law judge may disallow a representative if such representation constitutes a conflict of interest or is otherwise not in the interests of justice and may debar a representative for contumacious conduct relating to the proceedings.
( f ) *Ex parte communications.* The parties and their representatives may not make any *ex parte* communications to the administrative law judge concerning the merits of the allegations or any matters at issue, except as provided in § 356.18(j) regarding emergency interim sanctions.
§ 10.2 Accountability systems. The Director of the Office of Personnel Management may require an agency to establish and maintain a system of accountability for merit system principles that ( 1 ) Sets standards for applying the merit system principles,
( 2 ) Measures the agency's effectiveness in meeting these standards, and
( 3 ) Corrects any deficiencies in meeting these standards.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Forms
S-8 Nos. 333-75359, 333-69713, and 333-69715) of Delco Remy International, Inc.
pertaining to the 1997 Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plan and 1997
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan for Non-Employees Directors, the Delco Remy
America Personal Savings Plan for Hourly-Rate Employees in the United States of
Delco Remy International, Inc., and the Delco Remy International 401(k)
Retirement and Savings Plan of Delco Remy International, Inc. of our reports
dated February 13, 1999 and August 27, 1999 with respect to the financial
statements of Remy Korea, Ltd. as of and for the years ended December 31, 1998
and 1997, and as of December 31, 1996 and for the period from September 9, 1996
to December 31, 1996 prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the Republic of Korea included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended July 31, 1999.


                                                            /s/ Young Wha


Seoul, Korea
October 1, 1999