alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-098 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, June 27, 1997)

NRC ISSUES LETTER TO SPEC CONFIRMING SUSPENSION OF FABRICATION

OF PACKAGES FOR TRANSPORTATION OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Action Letter to

Source Production and Equipment Co., Inc. (SPEC), holder of three NRC certificates of

compliance for packages used to transport radioactive materials. The letter confirms

that SPEC will immediately suspend fabrication of all NRC-certified transportation

packages and take certain other actions.

During a June 16-19 inspection at SPEC's facility in St. Rose, Louisiana, the

NRC identified a problem regarding the method used by the company to conduct one of

the tests required by the Commission's regulations to show ability of the packages to

withstand hypothetical accident conditions. The test of concern is designed to

demonstrate that a package can withstand a puncture test when it is dropped 40

inches, in a position for which maximum damage is expected, onto the end of a vertical

steel bar mounted on an essentially unyielding, horizontal surface.

The NRC's concern involved SPEC's failure to properly mount the steel puncture

bar on the test pad. The NRC is also concerned that the company's quality assurance

program did not disclose the problem.

The letter to SPEC confirms that the company's suspension of fabrication of

NRC-certified transportation packages will continue in effect until the NRC authorizes

resumption of activities. As noted in the letter, the company submitted a test plan on

June 23 for verifying the validity of previously performed puncture tests.

In addition, the letter confirms that SPEC will:

(1) Perform testing of the Model SPEC-150 package design, and other package

designs, as appropriate. Due to its frequency of use, the Model SPEC-150 will be

tested first.

(2) Preserve all packaging, components, specimens and test records for

examination by the NRC. Submit test reports to the NRC within four business days

after the test.
(3) Obtain the services of an independent quality assurance expert to audit the

effectiveness of SPEC's quality assurance program in meeting NRC requirements.

###
#### Celia Schafer v. Max Held, Inc.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
461 P.2d 236

#### Charles M. MORGAN, Appellant, v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, Appellee.

No. 356.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

Oct. 31, 1969.

*755Charles • M. Morgan, pro se.

' E. P. Ripley,' Santa Fe, for appellee.

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

• This is an appeal by Charles M. Morgan, pro se, from a decision of the New Mexico State Board of Education that his appeal was not timely filed “and hence the State Board has no jurisdiction to hear the appeal.”

We agree that the State Board lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

On February 27, 1969, following a hearing held pursuant to § 77-8-14, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Vol. 11, pt. 1), Morgan was served with a copy of the Cobre Consolidated School District Board’s decision, findings and conclusions discharging him as a teacher.

On March 12, 1969, the State Board received a Notice of Appeal by Morgan from the Cobre Board’s decision. That appeal was attempted pursuant to § 77-8-17, N.M.S.A.1953 (Vol. 11, pt. 1) which states in part:

> “ * * * A written notice of appeal shall be filed with the state board within ten [10] days from the date a written copy of the decision of the local board is served upon the person making the appeal.”

The sole issue is the timeliness of the appeal to the State Board.

A computation shows that the 10th day was March 9, 1969. That day being Sunday, the time is extended to March 10, 1969 in accordance with § 21-1-1(6) (a), N.M.S.A.1953 (Supp.1969). Receipt of the notice of appeal by the State Board on March 12, 1969 was not timely. 'Failure to perfect a timely appeal is jurisdictional. Board of Ed., Penasco Ind. Sch. Dist. No. 4 v. Rodriquez, 77 N.M. 309, 422 P.2d 351 (1966), rehearing denied (1967). Without jurisdiction the State Board could not hear an appeal and the decision of the Cobre Board discharging Morgan must stand.

Morgan would have us examine matters outside of the record regarding his timeliness. This we cannot do. We are limited to the record in our consideration of an appeal. Section 21-2-1(17) (1), N.M.S.A. (1953). Federal National Mortgage Ass’n. v. Rose Realty Inc., 79 N.M. 281, 442 P.2d 593 (1968).

We see no basic unfairness in óur holding. Prior to the State Board hearing, Morgan had notice that the timeliness of his appeal would be ari issue'at that hearing. He had an opportunity to appear at the State Board hearing and be heard on the question of timeliness of his appeal. This he chose not to do. Morgan had an opportunity to appear before this court on three separate occasions. This he chose not to do. Prior to submission, Morgan was made aware by an Order of this court that the sole issue was that of timeliness. He chose not to appear nor to apply for a Writ of Certiorari for diminution of the record (to include within the record the matters on which he seeks, to rely on the issue of timeliness). Section 21-2-1(14) (12), N.M.S.A.1953.

Affirmed.

OMAN and WOOD, JJ., concur.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 11

- 00180

- CR

TOMMY LE ON JONES , Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 85th District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 20852

- 85

- B

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Tommy Leon Jones attempts to app eal from an order denying his motion to
recuse. By letter dated May 20, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Jones that the
appeal was subject to dismissal because it appeared the order denying Jones’ motion to
recuse was an interlocutory order and was not appealable. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P . 18a(f) (“If
the motion is denied, it may be reviewed for abuse of discretion on appeal from the final
judgment .” ) (E mphasis added); Means v. State , 825 S.W.2d 260, 260

- 61 (Tex. App.

—

Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, no pet.); see also Apolinar v. State , 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex.Jones v. State Page 2

Crim. App. 1991) (“The courts of appeals do not have jurisdiction to review
interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law.”). The
Clerk also warned Jones that the appe al would be dismissed unless, within 21 days of
the date of the letter, a response was filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 44.3. We have not received a response from Jones.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed June 1 5 , 2011 Do not publish [CR25]
### §74a–10. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 74a–10 was editorially reclassified as section 5144 of this title.
### §5309. Disbursement of compensation of House Members by Chief Administrative Officer

The moneys which have been, or may be, appropriated for the compensation and mileage of Members and Delegates shall be paid at the Treasury on requisitions drawn by the Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives, and shall be kept, disbursed, and accounted for by him according to law, and he shall be a disbursing officer, but he shall not be entitled to any compensation additional to the salary fixed by law.

(Oct. 1, 1890, ch. 1256, §3, 26 Stat. 645; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §204(25)(B), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1734.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 80 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "Chief Administrative Officer" for "Sergeant-at-Arms".
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Tim M. Wan, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of RealNetworks, Inc.; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2012



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Tim M. Wan                              
|Tim M. Wan                                  
|Title: Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### § 190.44 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         219,053
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               221,053
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 470,057
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,140
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,490
<OTHER-SE>                                     459,427
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   470,057
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,159
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,048) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,048)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,048)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>
Not presented since all shares of common stock are held by a sole
shareholder.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 174

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 174 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93025, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 174.27 Disposition after further review.

Upon completion of further review, the protest and appropriate documents forwarded for review shall be returned to the Center director together with directions for the disposition of the protest.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 720 

To encourage States to permit members of the Armed Forces who are outside 

of the State under orders to renew a permit to carry a concealed 

firearm through the mail, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 11, 2021 

Mr. HAWLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To encourage States to permit members of the Armed Forces 

who are outside of the State under orders to renew 

a permit to carry a concealed firearm through the mail, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘U.S. Military Right 

5 to Carry Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 720 IS

1 SEC. 2. CONCEALED CARRY RENEWALS BY MAIL FOR MEM2 BERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—A State that receives funds under 

4 subpart 1 of part E of title I of the Omnibus Crime Con5 trol and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10151 et 

6 seq.) shall have in place— 

7 (1) a law or policy that permits a member of 

8 the Armed Forces who is a resident of the State and 

9 who is outside of the State under orders to renew a 

10 permit to carry a concealed firearm through the 

11 mail; and 

12 (2) a law or policy that treats a member of the 

13 Armed Forces on active duty in the State as a resi14 dent of the State for purposes of issuing a permit 

15 to carry a concealed firearm in the State. 

16 (b) REDUCTION IN FUNDS.—Beginning in the first 

17 fiscal year that begins after the date of enactment of this 

18 Act, the Attorney General shall, with respect to the 

19 amount that a State would otherwise receive under the 

20 grant program described in subsection (a)— 

21 (1) reduce such amount by 5 percent in the 

22 case of a State that fails to comply with the require23 ment under subsection (a)(1); and 

24 (2) reduce such amount by 5 percent in the 

25 case of a State that fails to comply with the require26 ment under subsection (a)(2). 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 720 IS

1 (c) REALLOCATION.—The Attorney General shall re2 allocate amounts not awarded to a State pursuant to sub3 section (b) to States that comply with the requirement 

4 under subsection (a). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
### §§435, 436. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–187, title I, §105(1), Jan. 8, 1980, 93 Stat. 1354

Section 435, Pub. L. 92–225, title III, §305, Feb. 7, 1972, 86 Stat. 16; Pub. L. 93–443, title II, §205(a), Oct. 15, 1974, 88 Stat. 1278, related to requirements for campaign advertising.

Section 436, Pub. L. 92–225, title III, §306, Feb. 7, 1972, 86 Stat. 16; Pub. L. 93–443, title II, §§206, 207, 208(c)(5), Oct. 15, 1974, 88 Stat. 1278, 1279, 1286; Pub. L. 94–283, title I, §115(a), May 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 495, set forth formal requirements respecting reports and statements.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 8, 1980, see section 301(a) of Pub. L. 96–187, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 30101 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
Revised/Clean Ch 6

12/16/2011 06:50 PM

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Chapter 6_EmploymentandEconomicImpacts_1216 evening.docx
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 12/31/97
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         204,327
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,129
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               249,325
<PP&E>                                         209,227
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 495,850
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,980
<BONDS>                                        404,568
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        96,757
<OTHER-SE>                                    (45,915)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   495,850
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,373
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,972
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,860
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,826
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,689)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,689)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,689)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.33)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2004)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 62229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23843]



[[Page 62229]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 301

[REG-124872-04]
RIN 1545-BD37


Clarification of Definitions; Hearing Cancellation

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Cancellation of public hearing on proposed rulemaking by cross-
reference to temporary regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document cancels a public hearing on a notice of proposed 
rulemaking by cross-reference to temporary regulations under section 
7701 of the Internal Revenue Code that provide clarification of the 
definitions of a corporation and a domestic entity in circumstances 
where the business entity is considered to be created or organized in 
more than one jurisdiction.

DATES: The public hearing originally scheduled for November 3, 2004, at 
10 a.m., is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sonya M. Cruse of the Publications and 
Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel 
(Procedures and Administration), (202) 622-4693 (not a toll-free 
number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice of proposed rulemaking by cross-
reference to temporary regulations and notice of public hearing that 
appeared in the Federal Register on Thursday, August 12, 2004 (69 FR 
49840), announced that a public hearing was scheduled for November 3, 
2004 at 10 a.m., in the auditorium, Internal Revenue Service Building, 
1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The subject of the 
public hearing is under section 7701 of the Internal Revenue Code.
    The public comment period for these regulations expired on October 
15, 2004. The notice of proposed rulemaking instructed those interested 
in testifying at the public hearing to submit a request to speak and an 
outline of the topics to be addressed. As of Wednesday, October 20, 
2004, no one has requested to speak. Therefore, the public hearing 
scheduled for November 3, 2004, is cancelled.

Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing 
Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedures and Administration).
[FR Doc. 04-23843 Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of the cancellation of the Genetic Variation and Evolution Study Section, October 14, 2004, 8 a.m., to October 16, 2004, 4 p.m., The River Inn, 924 25th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037, which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 16, 2004, 69 FR 55830-55832.                

The meeting is cancelled due to lack of quorum.

Dated: October 17, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-23349  Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1418 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1418

  To exclude certain veterans' compensation and pension amounts from 
consideration as adjusted income for purposes of determining the amount 
of rent paid by a family for a dwelling unit assisted under the United 
                      States Housing Act of 1937.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2003

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To exclude certain veterans' compensation and pension amounts from 
consideration as adjusted income for purposes of determining the amount 
of rent paid by a family for a dwelling unit assisted under the United 
                      States Housing Act of 1937.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans' Housing Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM INCOME.

     Notwithstanding section 3 of the United States Housing Act of 
1937, for purposes of determining the amount of rent paid by a family 
for occupancy of a public housing dwelling unit or a dwelling unit 
assisted under section 8 of such Act, the adjusted income of a family 
shall not be considered to include any amounts received by any member 
of the family from the Secretary of Veterans Affairs as--
            (1) compensation, as defined in section 101(13) of title 
        38, United States Code;
            (2) dependency and indemnity compensation, as defined in 
        section 101(14) of such title; or
            (3) pension, as defined in section 101(15) of such title.
                                 <all>
```