alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle, IL 60532

 Web Site:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. III-01-030 July 3, 2001

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH EXELON NUCLEAR TO DISCUSS SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT

THE BYRON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with Exelon Nuclear officials July 10 to discuss

the NRCís annual assessment of safety performance at the Byron Nuclear Power Plant in Byron,

Illinois.

The meeting will begin at 1 p.m. CDT and will be held at the plantís Training Building, 4450

N. German Church Road, Room 107 in Byron. The public is invited to observe the session. NRC

officials will be available afterwards to answer questions.

The annual assessment, referred to as the End-of-Cycle assessment, evaluates safety

performance at the Byron plant from April 2000 through March 2001, and informs plant officials of the

NRCís plans for future inspections at the facility.

The Byron assessment letter and inspection report are available at http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr

or from the Region III Public Affairs Office. Current performance information for the plant is

available at http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html.

# # #
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin E. Franklin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Martin E. Franklin              
|Martin E. Franklin                  
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|November 5, 2007                    

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ian G.H. Ashken, Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/ Ian G.H. Ashken                      
|Ian G.H. Ashken                          
|Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
|November 5, 2007
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 03-151 November 19, 2003

 NRC SEEKS COMMENTS ON DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comments on its draft Strategic Plan,

covering Fiscal Years 2004 to 2009, that describes what the NRC intends to do over the next five years

to carry out it’s mission. 

The draft Strategic Plan has been restructured to improve its focus and readability, but does not

represent a fundamental change in the agency’s mission. The NRC’s overarching goal of ensuring the

safe use of radioactive materials and enhancing safety remains unchanged. The Plan along with a new

vision statement, better aligns the NRC’s goals with its mission and strategic objective to “enable the

use and management of radioactive materials and nuclear fuels for beneficial purposes in a manner that

(1) protects public health and safety and the environment; (2) promotes the security of our nation; and

(3) provides for regulatory actions that are effective, efficient, and open.”

The NRC issued its first Strategic Plan in 1997 and is required to update it every three years. 

The draft Strategic Plan will replace the agency’s existing plan (FY 2000-2005). It reduces redundancy

that exists in the current Strategic Plan and better reflects real world changes in our environment since

September 11, 2001.

 All interested individuals are encouraged to provide their comments on the draft Strategic Plan. 

Stakeholder feedback will be valuable in helping the Commission develop a final plan.

By December 31, all comments should be submitted to the NRC electronically at:

NRCREP@NRC.GOV ; by mail to: Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, Mail Stop T6-D59, Office of

Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; or faxed to:

Chief, Rules and Directives Branch at (301) 415-5144.

The draft Strategic Plan is available on NRC’s web site at: www.nrc.gov and is available for

inspection and copying for a fee at the NRC Public Document Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,

Maryland. 

###
§ 207.51 Judicial review of denial of application for disclosure of certain business proprietary information under administrative protective order. ( a ) *In general.* Persons entitled to judicial review under section 777(c)(2) of the Commission determination not to disclose business proprietary information may apply to the U.S. Court of International Trade for an order directing the Commission to make the information involved available.
( b ) *Transmittal of record.* In the event a court order is sought under section 777(c)(2) requiring the Commission to disclose business proprietary information, the Secretary shall within 20 days after service of a summons and complaint upon the Commission transmit to the court under seal the business proprietary information involved along with pertinent parts of the record.
( c ) *Pertinent parts of the record.* The pertinent parts of the record shall consist of: ( 1 ) The application for Commission disclosure together with any documents filed in support thereof or in opposition thereto.
( 2 ) Any Government memoranda relating to the Commission's determination, and
( 3 ) The Commission's action on the application.
( d ) *Service of process.* The Commission's General Counsel shall be the Commission's agent for service of process in cases under section 777(c)(2) of the Act.
#### Samuel Jacobson v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.
#### § 122.181 Definition of Customs security area.

For purposes of this section, the term “Customs security area” means the Federal inspection services area at any airport accommodating international air commerce designated for processing passengers, crew, their baggage and effects arriving from, or departing to, foreign countries, as well as the aircraft deplaning and ramp area and other restricted areas designated by the port director. These areas will be posted as restricted to the extent possible and are established for the purpose of prohibiting unauthorized entries or contact with persons or objects.

[T.D. 90-82, 55 FR 42557, Oct. 22, 1990, as amended by T.D. 02-40, 67 FR 48984, July 29, 2002]
#### § 192.1 Definitions.

The following are general definitions for the purposes of this subpart A.

*Certified.* “Certified” when used with reference to a copy means a document issued by a government authority that includes on it a signed statement by the authority that the copy is an authentic copy of the original.

*Copy.* “Copy” refers to a duplicate or photocopy of an original document. Where there is any writing on the backside of an original document, a “complete copy” means that both sides of the document are copied.

*Export.* “Export” refers to the transportation of merchandise out of the U.S. for the purpose of being entered into the commerce of a foreign country.

*Self-propelled vehicle.* “Self-propelled vehicle” includes any automobile, truck, tractor, bus, motorcycle, motor home, self-propelled agricultural machinery, self-propelled construction equipment, self-propelled special use equipment, and any other self-propelled vehicle used or designed for running on land but not on rail.

*Ultimate purchaser.* “Ultimate purchaser” means the first person, other than a dealer purchasing in his capacity as a dealer, who in good faith purchases a self-propelled vehicle for purposes other than resale.

*Used.* “Used” refers to any self-propelled vehicle the equitable or legal title to which has been transferred by a manufacturer, distributor, or dealer to an ultimate purchaser.

[T.D. 89-46, 54 FR 15403, Apr. 18, 1989, as amended by T.D. 99-34, 64 FR 16639, Apr. 6, 1999]
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/30/2010 11:05 AM
-----
|------------>
| From:      |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US                                                                                                                   
|
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To:        |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov                                                                                                                 
|
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Cc:        |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Michael Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Fred 
Talcott/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter Nagelhout/DC/USEPA/US@EPA           |
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date:      |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
  |07/30/2010 10:44 AM                                                                                                                         
|
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject:   |
|------------>
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|
  |comment letters on using data for larger engines to set limits for smaller 
engines                                                          |
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------|




Hi Cortney,
The folks that commented on the issue were INGAA and API, see EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-
0708-0180 and EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-0155.

Melanie King
Energy Strategies Group
Sector Policies and Programs Division
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency

Mail Code D243-01
RTP, NC  27711

Phone:  (919) 541-2469
Fax:       (919) 541-5450
king.melanie@epa.gov
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-81365-MIDDLEBROOKS/Brannon

HOWARD COHAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

LUFF’S FISH HOUSE, LLC,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER CLOSING CASE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the Parties’ Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with 

Prejudice, filed November 2, 2020. (DE 6). The Court congratulates the Parties on their amicable 

resolution of this matter and notes that pursuant to Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 

1272 (11th Cir. 2012), the Parties’ Stipulation is self-executing and no order of the Court is 

required to dismiss this action. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

(1) This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

(2) The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE THIS CASE and DENY AS MOOT all pending 

motions.

(3) The Court shall retain jurisdiction for a period of six months to enforce the terms of the 

Parties’ Settlement Agreement. 

SIGNED in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida, this 5th day of November, 2020.

Donald M. Middlebrooks

United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 9:20-cv-81365-DMM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/05/2020 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1999
<CASH>                                             954
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,524
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,138
<INVENTORY>                                      5,007
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,907
<PP&E>                                          14,748
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,340
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,535
<COMMON>                                            91
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,200
<SALES>                                         15,764
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,764
<CGS>                                            5,013
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,013
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,517
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  40
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    194
<INCOME-TAX>                                        21
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                173
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       173
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)
**Title:****Annual report**
 
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc:ID 1.27:M 29/5/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000638127
 
October 31, 2017
§ 4.31 Unlading or transshipment due to casualty. ( a ) When any cargo or stores of a vessel have been unladen or transshipped at any place in the United States or its Customs waters other than a port of entry because of accident, stress of weather, or other necessity, no penalty shall be imposed under section 453 or 586(a), Tariff Act of 1930, if due notice is given to the director of the port at which the vessel thereafter first arrives and satisfactory proof is submitted to him as provided for in section 586(f), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, regarding such accident, stress of weather, or other necessity. The port director may accept the certificates of the master and two or more officers or members of the crew of the vessel, of whom the person next to the master in command shall be one, as proof that the unlading or transshipment was necessary by reason of unavoidable cause.
( b ) The port director may then permit entry of the vessel and its cargo and permit the unlading of the cargo in such place at the port as he may deem proper. Unless its transportation has been in violation of the coastwise laws, the cargo may be cleared through Customs at the port where it is discharged or forwarded to the port of original destination under an entry for immediate transportation or for transportation and exportation, as the case may be. All regulations shall apply in such cases as if the unlading and delivery took place at the port of original destination.
[28 FR 14596, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 95-77, 60 FR 50010, Sept. 27, 1995]
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105 - 2498

**ME MORA**  **NDUM** SUBJECT: Heavy- Duty Hy brid Onboard Diagnostics FROM: Am y Kopin TO: The Docket DATE: July

21, 2011 

### On July 11 th 

### , and the 1 4 th 

### , 2011 we held conference call s with Li sa A. Stegink of the Engine Manufacturers Association (EM A) to discuss concerns and questions raised by members of EMA regarding heavy- duty onboard diagnostic (OBD) requirements and timing . EMA members raised concern s during the comment period for the heavy- duty greenhouse gas notice of proposed rulemaking that heavy - duty hy brid applications may not be able to meet the 2013 heavy- duty

OBD regulations that were published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking. 1 , 2 

### Specifically , they

have requested a delay

of the application of HD OBD requirements for hy brid application s until 2020. Attendees from the EPA included Cleophas Jackson, Anthony Neam, and Amy Kopin.

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium and Heavy - Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished Decembe r 29, 2010. Available here: http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR - 2010 - 12 - 29/html/2010 - 32726.htm 2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic Systems on 2010 and Later Heavy - Duty Engines Used in Highway Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy - Duty Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds ,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: http://www.epa.gov/o taq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd - obd - frm - 02 - 24 - 09 - notice - 74 - fr - 8310.pdf OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
May 11, 2000



Global Industries, Ltd.
8000 Global Drive
Carlyss, Louisiana 70665


We have made a review, in accordance with standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the
unaudited interim financial information of Global Industries,
Ltd. and subsidiaries for the periods ended March 31, 2001 and
2000, as indicated in our report dated May 3, 2001, because we
did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included
in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2001, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement
Nos. 33-58048, 33-89778, and 333-69949 of Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to
Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a
part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New Orleans, Louisiana
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1529

To amend title 11 of the United States Code with respect to the dismissal 

of certain involuntary cases. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2003

Mr. SENSENBRENNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend title 11 of the United States Code with respect 

to the dismissal of certain involuntary cases.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Involuntary Bank5 ruptcy Improvement Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

7 Section 303 of title 11, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(l)(1) If—
2

•HR 1529 IH 

1 ‘‘(A) the petition under this section is false or 

2 contains any materially false, fictitious, or fraudu3 lent statement; 

4 ‘‘(B) the debtor is an individual; and 

5 ‘‘(C) the court dismisses such petition; 

6 the court, upon motion of the debtor, shall expunge from 

7 the records of the court such petition, all the records relat8 ing to such petition in particular, and all references to 

9 such petition. 

10 ‘‘(2) If the debtor is an individual and the court dis11 misses a petition under this section, the court may enter 

12 an order prohibiting all consumer reporting agencies (as 

13 defined in section 603 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act) 

14 from making any consumer report (as defined in section 

15 603 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act) that contains any 

16 information relating to such petition or to the case com17 menced by the filing of such petition.’’.

Æ