alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Oruzgan

Zabol

Yazdan

Sar-e-Pol

Qal'eh-ye Panjeh

Zaranj

Kabul

Asadabad

Gardeyz

Zareh

Sharan

Ghazni

Qalat

Tarin

Kowt

Kandahar

Samangan

Baghlan

Mazar-e Sharif

Sheberghan

Meymaneh

Qal'eh-ye Now

Chaghcharan

Farah

Herat

Lashkar Gah

Bamian

Taloqan

Feyzabad

Charikar

Mahmud-e

Raqi

Kunduz

Kowt-e 'Ashrow

KONAR

TURKMENISTAN

UZBEKISTAN

IRAN

TAJIKISTAN

CHINA

PAKISTAN

PAKISTAN

PAKISTAN

INDIA

REGIONS

Northeastern

Northern

East Central

Eastern

Central

Southern

Western

2004 USAID/DCHA/OFDA

GRANTS IN AFGHANISTAN

The boundaries and names shown and the designations

used on this map do not imply official endorsement or 

acceptance by the United Nations.

U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)

IOM

UN FAO

NATIONWIDE

ASSISTANCE

4/26/04

UNCLASSIFIED

ORUZGAN

FARYAB

SAR-E-POL

HELMAND

CHF

IMC

SFL

KABUL

BADGHIS

KUNDUZ

GHOR

BAMIAN

BALKH

NIMRUZ

FARAH

GHAZNI

WARDAK

LOWGAR

PAKTIA

NANGAHAR

LAGHMAN

KAPISA

PARWAN

PAKTIKA

ZABUL

KANDAHAR

SAMANGAN

JOWZAN

CRS

HERAT

BADAKSHAN

ACTED

BAGHLAN

ACTED

TAKHAR

ACTED

FARYAB

C

C

C

C

C

4

Agriculture

Capacity Building

Cash for Work

FEWS

IDP Assistance

Non-Food Items

Shelter

Winter Programs

Y

Y

4 C

C

C

C

C

;

;

;

;

©

©

 

œ

œ

œ

œ
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-01-0111 - Development of an Industry Trends Program for Operating Power Reactors

Accession Number: ML011570324

Date Released: Tuesday, July 10, 2001

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML011220001 - SECY-01-0111 - Development of an Industry Trends Program for Operating Power Reactors (18 page(s), 6/22/2001)
    - ML011560889 - SECY-01-0111-Attachment 3-Pages 1-5 and 6-25  -  Development of an Industry Trends Program for Operating Power Reactors (12 page(s), 6/22/2001)
    - ML011570251 - SECY-01-0111- Attachment 3, pages 6-19 - Development of an Industry Trends Program for Operating Power Reactors (14 page(s), 6/22/2001)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### § 191.195 Combined application for certification in drawback compliance program and waiver of prior notice and/or approval of accelerated payment of drawback.

An applicant for certification in the drawback compliance program may also, in the same application, apply for waiver of prior notice of intent to export and accelerated payment of drawback, under subpart I of this part. Alternatively, an applicant may separately apply for certification in the drawback compliance program and either or both waiver of prior notice and accelerated payment of drawback. In the former instance, the intent to apply for certification and waiver of prior notice and/or approval of accelerated payment of drawback must be clearly stated. In all instances, all of the requirements for certification and the procedure applied for must be met (for example, in a combined application for certification in the drawback compliance program and both procedures, all of the information required for certification and each procedure, all required sample documents for certification and each procedure, and all required certifications must be included in and with the application).
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 03-107 August 21, 2003

NRC STAFF ISSUES BULLETIN TO NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

ON REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL LOWER HEAD PENETRATIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued a Bulletin to companies licensed to

operate the 58 PWRs which have penetrations in the bottom (i.e., lower head) of the vessel to

accommodate instrumentation for monitoring the reactor core (i.e., the nuclear fuel). The Bulletin

directs them to provide information on how they inspect the lower portion of their reactor vessels to

detect any possible leakage.

In April, an inspection of the lower head at South Texas Project (STP) Unit 1 revealed boric

acid residue on two penetrations; the residue was later determined to have indicated the presence of

small cracks in the penetrations. The NRC staff determined the residue and small cracks discovered at

STP Unit 1 were not an immediate safety concern. Nonetheless, since more significant leakage could

challenge safety systems, the staff concluded licensees should assess their current inspection practices

to ensure there is no lower head leakage. The Bulletin requests licensees to provide the following:

1) A description of the lower head penetration inspection program currently in place, including

data such as when inspections were performed, the methods used, and the basis for concluding

the plant satisfies applicable regulations;

2) A description of the lower head penetration inspections to be performed during the plant’s

future refueling outages, including data such as the extent of the inspections, the methods to be

used, and the basis for concluding the plant will satisfy applicable regulations;

3) If the licensee is unable to perform a bare-metal inspection of the lower head during the next

refueling outage, the licensee is to inform the NRC whether bare-metal visual inspections will

be performed during future outages, as well as describe the actions it plans to take to permit the

inspection, and;

4) If the licensee does not plan to perform bare-metal inspections during future refueling

outages, the licensee should provide the basis for concluding that the inspections the licensee

does perform satisfy applicable regulations.
- 2 -

Within 60 days of restarting a plant following the next inspection of the lower head, licensees

should submit a summary of the inspections performed, the conditions found, and any actions to be

taken.

Bulletin 2003-02, “Leakage From Reactor Pressure Vessel Lower Head Penetrations and

Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Integrity,” will be available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/gen-comm/bulletins/2003/ . 

###
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATION
      OF THE


PRINCIPAL
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Daniel
      L. Coury, Sr., the Chief Executive Officer of LiveDeal, Inc., certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of LiveDeal, Inc. on Form
      10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of LiveDeal, Inc.





Date:
                December 20, 2007
            */s/
                Daniel L. Coury, Sr.*Daniel
                L. Coury, Sr.Chief
                Executive Officer





I,
      Gary
      L. Perschbacher, the Chief Financial Officer of LiveDeal, Inc., certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of LiveDeal, Inc. on Form
      10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of LiveDeal, Inc.





Date:
                December 20, 2007
            */s/
                Gary L. Perschbacher*Gary
                L. PerschbacherChief
                Financial Officer
#### § 148.45 Vehicles and other conveyances.

Nonresidents are entitled to entry free of duty and internal revenue tax under subheading 9804.00.35 and Chapter 98, U.S. Note 3, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202), for automobiles, trailers, aircraft, motorcycles, bicycles, baby carriages, boats, horse-drawn conveyances, horses, and similar means of transportation and the usual equipment accompanying them, if such articles are imported in connection with the arrival of the nonresident to be used in the United States only for the transportation of the nonresident, his family and guests, and such incidental carriage of articles as may be appropriate to his personal use of the conveyance.

[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51265, Dec. 21, 1988]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1587

MARVIN D. TOM; MARLA J. TOM,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

JANET RENO, Attorney General; HELEN F. FAHEY,

United States Attorney; MARGARET MILNER RICHARDSON, Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service

Headquarters; JOSEPH H. CLOONAN, Director,

Philadelphia Internal Revenue Service Center;

N. J. AIELLO, Chief, Collections Branch,

Philadelphia Internal Revenue Service Center;

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CA-96-1820-A)

Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 3, 1998

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marvin D. Tom, Marla J. Tom, Appellants Pro Se. Randolph L.

Hutter, Annette Marie Wietecha, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Robert K. Coulter, OFFICE OF THE UNITED

STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's orders dismissing

their complaint in which they sought $16 million in damages for the

alleged wrongful disclosure of return information in a notice of

levy by the Internal Revenue Service, denying their motion for

reconsideration, denying their motion for recusal of the district

court judge, and denying as moot their motions filed after entry of

the judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinions. Accordingly, we deny the Appellees' motion for the imposition of sanctions and affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Tom v. Reno, No. CA-96-1820-A (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, Mar. 4, 11,

and 20, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-3260

_____________________________

D. S., a child,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

September 23, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as moot.

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Charlie Cofer, Public Defender, and Elizabeth Hogan Webb, 

Assistant Public Defender, Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4108 — T-Systems/Gedas)

(2006/C 23/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
EXHIBIT  20.1
                              NEWMARK  HOMES  CORP.

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K


                                 CURRENT REPORT


                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


                DATE OF EARLIEST REPORTED EVENT DECEMBER 17, 1998



                               NEWMARK HOMES CORP.
              (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)




            NEVADA                 333-42213            76-0460831
(State or other jurisdiction of   (Commission         (IRS  Employer
 incorporation or organization)   File Number)     Identification Number)


                            1200 SOLDIERS FIELD DRIVE
                            SUGAR LAND, TEXAS  77479
              (Address of Registrant's principal executive offices)


                                  281-243-0100
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)




                                       N/A
          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

<PAGE>
ITEM  1.  CHANGES  IN  CONTROL  OF  THE  REGISTRANT

The  Registrant  has  been advised that the holder of shares representing 80% of
the  Registrant's outstand-ing common stock, $.01 par value (the "Common Stock")
has pledged those shares in support of a commercial loan.  Pacific Realty Group,
Inc.,  a  Nevada  corporation  ("PRG"),  which is the wholly owned subsidiary of
Pacific  USA  Holdings  Corp., a Texas corporation ("PUSA"), which is the wholly
owned  subsidiary  of Pacific Electric Wire & Cable Co., Ltd., beneficially owns
9,200,000  shares  (the  "Shares")  of  Common  Stock  of  the Registrant, which
represent  80%  of  the issued and outstanding Common Stock.  PRG has pledged to
certain  banks  all  of  the  Shares  in  conjunc-tion with a Loan Agreement, as
described  below.

On  December 17, 1998, PUSA and a sister corporation entered into an $85 million
loan  agreement  (the  "Loan Agreement") with a commercial bank (the "Bank"), in
the  ordinary  course  of  their  business  and, in connection there-with and in
support  of the obligation of its parent corporation and the sister corporation,
PRG  pledged  as  collateral  all  of  the  Shares  to  the  Bank.

<PAGE>
SIGNATURES

Pursuant  to  the  requirements  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934, the
Registrant  has  duly  caused  this  report  to  be  signed on its behalf by the
undersigned,  thereunto  duly  authorized.

NEWMARK  HOMES  CORP.
January  4,  1999



By:  /s/  Michael  K.  McCraw
     -----------------------------------
          Michael  K.  McCraw,  Chairman

<PAGE>
#### Ben Tucker, Doing Business as Hudson Bay Fur Company, Appellant, v. Joseph Honigman et al., Doing Business as Hudson Canadian Fur Company, et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
§ 206.12 Definitions applicable to subpart B of this part. For the purposes of this subpart, the following terms have the meanings hereby assigned to them: ( a ) *Adjustment plan* means a plan to facilitate positive adjustment to import competition submitted by a petitioner to the Commission and USTR either with the petition or at any time within 120 days after the date of filing of the petition.
( b ) *Commitment* means commitments that a firm in the domestic industry, a certified or recognized union or group of workers in the domestic industry, a local community, a trade association representing the domestic industry, or any other person or group of persons submits to the Commission regarding actions such persons and entities intend to take to facilitate positive adjustment to import competition.
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                                Certification of
                             Chief Executive Officer
                         of Prime Medical Services, Inc.


This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for
the quarter ended September 30, 2002 of Prime Medical Services, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Issuer").

I, Brad A. Hummel, the Chief Executive Officer, of Issuer certify that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section
              13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
              U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Issuer.

Dated:  November 13, 2002.



                                           /s/ Brad A. Hummel
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Brad A. Hummel
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           Prime Medical Services, Inc.
§ 207.30 Comment on information. ( a ) In any final phase of an investigation under section 705 or section 735 of the Act, the Commission shall specify a date on which it will disclose to all parties to the investigation all information it has obtained on which the parties have not previously had an opportunity to comment. Any such information that is business proprietary information will be released to persons authorized to obtain such information pursuant to § 207.7. The date on which disclosure is made will occur after the filing of posthearing briefs pursuant to § 207.25.
( b ) The parties shall have an opportunity to file comments on any information disclosed to them after they have filed their posthearing brief pursuant to § 207.25. A comment shall be filed electronically, and nine (9) true paper copies shall be submitted on the same business day. Comments shall only concern such information, and shall not exceed 15 pages of textual material, double-spaced and single-sided, when printed out on paper measuring 8.5 × 11 inches. A comment may address the accuracy, reliability, or probative value of such information by reference to information elsewhere in the record, in which case the comment shall identify where in the record such information is found. Comments containing new factual information shall be disregarded. The date on which such comments must be filed will be specified by the Commission when it specifies the time that information will be disclosed pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section. The record shall close on the date such comments are due, except with respect to investigations subject to the provisions of section 771(7)(G)(iii) of the Act, and with respect to changes in bracketing of business proprietary information in the comments permitted by § 207.3(c).
[61 FR 37833, July 22, 1996, as amended at 76 FR 61943, Oct. 6, 2011; 79 FR 35925, June 25, 2014]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio LeMarc WHITE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-6355.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 28, 2002.

*367Antonio LeMarc White, Appellant Pro Se.

Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Antonio LeMarc White seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *United States v. White,*Nos. CR-97-80; CA-01-236-7 F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 15 & Feb. 5, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### Herman Rakov, Respondent, v. Bankers Life Insurance Company of the City of New York, Appellant.

The justices qualified to sit in this

appeal being equally divided and unable to render a decision therein, the same is transferred to the Appellate Division, Third Department, to be there heard and determined pursuant to section 231 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Merrell, J., not sitting.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-4005

No. IV-03-015 April 2, 2003

CONTACT: Victor Drick E-mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128 

 NRC TO MEET WITH ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. TO DISCUSS

 PERFORMANCE OF ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE 

 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Entergy Operations,

Inc., on Wednesday, April 9, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual assessment of safety

performance at Arkansas Nuclear One. The facility, which includes two operating reactors, is located

near Russellville, AK, and is operated by Entergy. 

 The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 6:30

p.m. at Arkansas Tech University, 233 Doc Bryan Student Services Center, Russellville.

Before the session is adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the

public on the safety performance of the plant, as well as the role of the NRC in ensuring safe plant

operation.

 The performance period to be discussed is January 1 to December 31, 2002. In addition, NRC

staff will provide an overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process works.

 A letter sent from the NRC Region IV Office to representatives of Entergy, addresses the

performance of the plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is

available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/ano_2002q4.pdf

"Overall, Arkansas Nuclear One operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety

and fully met all cornerstone objectives," the letter says. "However, the significance of two findings is

still under review as part of the Significance Determination Process: (1) a fire protection program

finding related to the use of manual actions to achieve safe shutdown; and (2) a repeat reactor coolant

system boundary leak. Depending on the outcome of this review, these findings could result in

required supplemental inspections."

In addition, the letter notes: "As you are aware, since the terrorist attacks on September 11,

2001, the NRC has issued several Orders and threat advisories to enhance security capabilities and

improve guard force readiness. We have conducted inspections to review your implementation of

these requirements and have monitored your actions in response to changing threat conditions. For

calendar year 2003, we plan to continue these inspections and conduct portions of the security baseline
inspection program, as well as perform additional inspections to evaluate your compliance with new

requirements that may be ordered."

Current performance information for Arkansas Nuclear One Unit 1 is available on the NRC

web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/ANO1/ano1_chart.html

Current performance information for Unit 2 is available at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/ANO2/ano2_chart.html

###
#### § 207.16 [Reserved]
#### § 210.2 General policy.

It is the policy of the Commission that, to the extent practicable and consistent with requirements of law, all investigations and related proceedings under this part shall be conducted expeditiously. The parties, their attorneys or other representatives, and the presiding administrative law judge shall make every effort at each stage of the investigation or related proceeding to avoid delay.