alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-105 August 14, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $4,400 FINE

FOR ALLEGED VIOLATIONS AT GRAND VIEW HOSPITAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has cited Grand View

Hospital in Sellersville, Pa., for three alleged violations of

NRC requirements. The staff has proposed a $4,400 fine.

The alleged violations were found during an NRC inspection

at the facility in June to look into the events surrounding a

contaminated package that was sent back to a nuclear pharmacy on

June 3. Based on information gathered during that inspection and

a predecisional enforcement conference held in the Regional

Office on July 17, the NRC staff has determined there were three

apparent violations: failure to ensure that external removable

contamination on the package was within regulatory limits,

failure to conduct daily radiation level surveys and weekly

removable contamination level surveys of the nuclear medicine

“hot lab” floor, and the failure of the radiation safety officer

to ensure that radiation safety activities were being performed

in accordance with approved procedures and regulatory

requirements.

In a letter to the hospital, NRC Region I Administrator

Hubert J. Miller said, “The failure of your staff to ensure that

an adequate survey was performed prior to transporting the

package to Syncor (the nuclear pharmacy), as well as the failure

of the RSO (radiation safety officer) to adequately oversee the

radiation program, represents a very significant regulatory

concern because such failures have the potential to cause

unnecessary exposure to members of your staff, the staff at the

receiving facility, and members of the public while the package

in transport.”

Normally, he said, such violations would be classified in

the aggregate as a severity level I problem, the most severe

rating in the four-level NRC enforcement policy. However, given

the actual safety consequences that resulted, the NRC has

determined that these violations are best classified as a

severity level II problem.

Mr. Miller also noted that Grand View Hospital’s corrective

actions were prompt and comprehensive. Those actions include

retraining of technologists, commitments that there will be

increased involvement by the radiation safety officer, and plans

to survey the hospital “hot lab” and all surfaces of transport

cases for radioactive contamination.

The hospital has 30 days either to pay the proposed fine or to

request in writing that all or part of the penalty be withdrawn.

#
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<CIK>     0001046883
<NAME>     Asian Star Development, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>     1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                        5628
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                   3905
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            186282
<PP&E>                                     1363294
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             7950672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1597065
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     12956
<OTHER-SE>                                 8510311
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               7950672
<SALES>                                      41926
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             95296
<CGS>                                       104214
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               104214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           1151311
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (1158145)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (1158145)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.09)


</TABLE>
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-10 January 27, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC CHAIRMAN JACKSON TO TOUR MILLSTONE UNITS ON FEBRUARY 2;

WILL HOLD PRESS CONFERENCE, PUBLIC MEETING

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Shirley Ann Jackson will tour the

three units at the Millstone Nuclear Power Station on Monday, February 2, and

afterwards will conduct both a press conference and a separate public meeting in

Waterford, Conn.

The Chairman’s plant tours and meetings with plant owner Northeast Utilities’

management and staff will take place that morning and early afternoon.

The press conference, which will last about 45 minutes, will begin at 4:30 p.m. in

the Waterford Town Hall.

The Chairman will meet with the public at Waterford High School from 7 to 8:30

p.m. Following her opening remarks, the Chairman will take questions from the

audience.

Questions at the press conference will be restricted to the press. The Chairman

will respond to questions and comments from the public at the public meeting.

#
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF SIMIONE  CENTRAL  HOLDINGS,  INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 2000,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000896157
<NAME>                        SIMIONE CENTRAL HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                               1

<S>                                        <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000

<CASH>                                         2,208,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,624,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     237,000
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              12,457,000
<PP&E>                                         2,368,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,108,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                41,489,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         21,193,000
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           4,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    18,265,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  41,489,000
<SALES>                                        4,000,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,000,000
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,547,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,590,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (76,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,207,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (157,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,050,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,050,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.27)



</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors
Raindance Communications, Inc.: We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Forms S-8 (Nos.
333-44348 and 333-82266) and Form S-3 (No. 333-88734) of Raindance Communications, Inc. of our
reports dated March 14, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Raindance
Communications, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports
appear in the December 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Raindance Communications, Inc. KPMG LLP Boulder, Colorado
March 14, 2005
#### Austro-American Aluminum Corporation, Appellant, v. Golwynne Chemicals Corporation, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ.
# Exhibit 5ATI-2398366v9Factors Affecting Cost Effectiveness Estimatesfor Dry FGD at OG&E Units and Other FacilitiesFacilityMWgrossFuel SulfurContentMax HeatInput PerUnit(mmBtu/hr)Baseline EmissionsRate(lb/mmBtu)TotalAnnualCost PerUnitTPY RemovedPer UnitAssumed ControlEffectiveness of(% SO2removal)Average AnnualCostEffectiveness($/ton)White BluffUnits 1-2850 0.87% 9,339 –10,221Max 24-hour 2001-2003(0.854-0.915)$65.1M26,591 - 26,802 82.4% - 83.6% $2,431 - $2,450NCSUnit 1650(net)0.34% 6,776 Max 24-hour frombaseline period (0.815)$34.7M 19,739 81.6% $1,759GGSUnits 1-2750 0.7% 7,393-7,782 Max 24-hour 2001-2003 (0.749)$53.1M55.3M19,397-20,418 80.0% $2,712 - $2,740BoardmanUnit 1617 0.17 - 1.00% 5,793 Highest rolling 12-mo.2003-2005 (0.614)$36.3M 11,259 75.6%1$3,226NortheasternUnits 3-4493 0.45 - 0.49% 4,775 Max 24-hour from2002-2005 (0.90)$43.4M 13,280 83.0% $3,266OG&E May 2008 and Sept. 2009 DataSooner Units1 and 25690.20 - 0.37% 5,116 Annual ave. 2004-2006(0.509-0.516)$71.0M 6,553 - 7,377 80.4% - 80.6% $9,625 - $10,843MuskogeeUnits 4 and 5572 0.20 - 0.37% 5,480 Annual ave. 2004-2006(0.507-0.514)$68.4M 6,846 – 6,953 80.3% - 80.5% $9,842 - $10,004OG&E December 2009 DataSooner Units1 and 25690.20 - 0.37% 5,116 3-year ave. 2004-2006(0.509-0.516)$46.8M 6,553 - 7,377 80.4% - 80.6% $6,348 - $7,147MuskogeeUnits 4 and 5572 0.20 - 0.37% 5,480 3-year ave. 2004-2006(0.507-0.514)$50.1M 6,846 – 6,953 80.3% - 80.5% $7,211 - $7,3241This is Portland General Electric's (PG&E) estimate. The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality decided control effectiveness should not beevaluated based on a percent reduction because Boardman already burns low-sulfurcoal, and its current SO2emission rate is about 0.6 lb/mmBtu. To meet a90% emission reduction, emissions at the outlet of the control device would need to be 0.06 lb/mmBtu. ODEQ thought this rate was not achievable at the bestperforming units with similar control devices.SeeODEQ BART Report for Boardman at 17, http://www.deq.state.or.us/aq/haze/docs/deqBartReport.pdf.ATI-2398366v9ReferencesOG&E BART Analyses for Muskogee and Sooner Generating Stations (May 2008)Sargent and Lundy BART Cost Effectiveness Update for Sooner and Muskogee Generating Stations (Sept. 17, 2009)Revised BART Analysis for White Bluff (Aug. 2008)BART Analysis for Nebraska City Station(NCS) Unit 1 (Aug. 2007), available at http://www.deq.state.ne.us/AirDivis.nsf/Pages/HazeRevised BART Analysis for Gerald Gentleman Station Units 1 and2 (Feb. 2008), available at http://www.deq.state.ne.us/AirDivis.nsf/Pages/HazePortland General Electric BART Analysis for Boardman Power Plant (Nov. 2, 2007), available athttp://blog.oregonlive.com/breakingnews/2007/11/boardman.pdfODEQ BART Report for Boardman Power Plant (Dec. 19, 2008), availableat http://www.deq.state.or.us/aq/haze/docs/deqBartReport.pdf.
#### § 207.17 Staff report.

Prior to the Commission's preliminary determination, the Director shall submit to the Commission a staff report. A public version of the staff report shall be made available to the public after the Commission's preliminary determination and a business proprietary version shall also be made available to persons authorized to receive business proprietary information under § 207.7.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA - 2013 - 0699 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM198AD

AOF100 - 176 --- 5/15/12 AOF100 - 178 --- 9/10/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James A. BUTLER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-6028.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 23, 2002.

James A. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

*95Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

James A. Butler appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing his Fed. R.Crim.P. 41(e) motion without prejudice and denying his motion for reconsideration. A dismissal without prejudice is a final order only if no amendment of the complaint could cure the defects in the plaintiffs case. *Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,*10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). In ascertaining whether a dismissal without prejudice is reviewable in this court, we must determine whether Butler could save his motion by merely amending and refiling. *See id.*

Because Butler’s motion was dismissed without prejudice, Butler could file either another Rule 41(e) motion, amended in accordance with the district court’s instructions, and/or a motion for authorization from this court to file a successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) motion attacking his underlying conviction. In fact, after Butler’s motion was denied, he filed an amended Rule 41(e) motion in district court. Therefore, the district court’s orders are not appealable. Accordingly, we deny premission to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction under *Domino Sugar.*We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer
of Central European Distribution Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 1, 2010/s/    William V. CareyWilliam V. Carey Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

OMNI Energy Services Corp's Subsidiaries


         OMNI Energy Services Corp
         Trussco, Inc.
         Trussco Properties, L.L.C.
         American Helicopters Inc.
         OMNI Energy Seismic Services Corp
         OMNI Offshore Aviation Corp
         OMNI Seismic Aviation Corp
         OMNI Properties Corp.
         OMNI Energy Services Corp. - Mexico
         OMNI Energia Mexicana
         OMNI International Energy Services
         American Aviation L.L.C.
         OMNI Energy Services - Alaska, Inc.
         Hamilton Drill Tech, Inc.
         Gulf Coast Resources, Inc.
#### § 207.44 Consolidation of investigations.

The Commission may, when appropriate, consolidate continued investigations under section 704(g) or section 734(g) of the Act with investigations to review agreements for the elimination of injury under section 704(h) or section 734(h) of the Act.
Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-131 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 1 of

4
Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-131 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 2 of

4
EXHIBIT A 

FILED UNDER SEAL 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-131 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 3 of

4
EXHIBIT B 

FILED UNDER SEAL 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 285-131 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2022 Page 4 of

4
### §2005. Reports and studies for Congress

The Secretary shall provide to the Committee on Science of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate copies of any report or study that the Department of Energy prepares at the direction of any committee of Congress relating to the methane hydrate research and development program implemented under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 106–193, §6, as added Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, §968(a), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 898.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 6 of Pub. L. 106–193 was set out in a note under section 1902 of this title prior to the general amendment of Pub. L. 106–193 by Pub. L. 109–58.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Science of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Tenth Congress, Jan. 5, 2007. Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, Jan. 5, 2011.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


Board of Directors
Wyman Park Bancorporation, Inc.
11 West Ridgely Road
Lutherville, Maryland  21093

         We consent to the incorporation of our report dated July 26, 2000, with
respect to the financial statements of Wyman Park Bancorporation, Inc., included
in this Form 10-KSB, for the year ended June 30, 2000, into the previously filed
Registration  Statements of Wyman Park Bancorporation,  Inc., on Forms S-8 (File
Nos. 333-74235 and 333-74249).

                                        /s/ Andersen Associates LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
September 20, 2000
### §1007. Readjustment of lease terms and conditions

#### (a) Initial readjustment; periodic intervals; notice; objections, relinquishment, and termination

The Secretary may readjust the terms and conditions, except as otherwise provided herein, of any geothermal lease issued under this chapter at not less than ten-year intervals beginning ten years after the date the geothermal steam is produced, as determined by the Secretary. Each geothermal lease issued under this chapter shall provide for such readjustment. The Secretary shall give notice of any proposed readjustment of terms and conditions, and, unless the lessee files with the Secretary objection to the proposed terms or relinquishes the lease within thirty days after receipt of such notice, the lessee shall conclusively be deemed to have agreed with such terms and conditions. If the lessee files objections, and no agreement can be reached between the Secretary and the lessee within a period of not less than sixty days, the lease may be terminated by either party.

#### (b) Rentals and royalties; initial readjustment; periodic intervals; limitation on increases and on royalties; notice; objections, relinquishment, and termination

The Secretary may readjust the rentals and royalties of any geothermal lease issued under this chapter at not less than twenty-year intervals beginning thirty-five years after the date geothermal steam is produced, as determined by the Secretary. In the event of any such readjustment neither the rental nor royalty may be increased by more than 50 per centum over the rental or royalty paid during the preceding period. Each geothermal lease issue 1 under this chapter shall provide for such readjustment. The Secretary shall give notice of any proposed readjustment of rentals and royalties, and, unless the lessee files with the Secretary objection to the proposed rentals and royalties or relinquishes the lease within thirty days after receipt of such notice, the lessee shall conclusively be deemed to have agreed with such terms and conditions. If the lessee files objections, and no agreement can be reached between the Secretary and the lessee within a period of not less than sixty days, the lease may be terminated by either party.

#### (c) Surface use, protection, or restoration of lands withdrawn or acquired for Federal agency; notice; approval of agency

Any readjustment of the terms and conditions as to use, protection, or restoration of the surface of any lease of lands withdrawn or acquired in aid of a function of a Federal department or agency other than the Department of the Interior may be made only upon notice to, and with the approval of, such department or agency.

(Pub. L. 91–581, §8, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1569; Pub. L. 109–58, title II, §§229, 236(8), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 668, 672.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2005—Pub. L. 109–58, §236(8), inserted section catchline.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–58, §229, substituted "period" for "period, and in no event shall the royalty payable exceed 221⁄2 per centum" in second sentence.

1 So in original. Probably should be "issued".