alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-005 February 5, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS WITH PA. CIVIL ENGINEERING FIRM

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of a Pennsylvania civil

engineering firm on Thursday, February 8, to discuss apparent violations of agency requirements

involving the use and control of gauges containing radioactive material.

The predecisional enforcement conference is scheduled to begin at 9:30 a.m. in the Public

Meeting Room of the NRC Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa. It will be open to the public.

Gilmore and Associates Inc., based in New Britain, Pa., owns six portable nuclear gauges. The

devices contain cesium-137 and americium-241 and are used to measure the density and moisture

content of soil and asphalt. The use of gauges is a small part of the company’s business.

During an NRC safety inspection conducted on November 15 and 16 and December 19, seven

apparent violations were identified, five of which were repeats of violations found during the previous

inspection. The most significant apparent violation was a failure to control and maintain constant

surveillance of a portable nuclear gauge, which resulted in severe damage to the device when it was

run over by heavy construction equipment. Although the gauge was severely damaged, the nuclear

materials remained intact and no radiation exposure to personnel occurred.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean the NRC has

determined a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the purpose is to

discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance; to provide the licensee with an

opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to

enable the licensee to outline its proposed corrective action.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this conference. That decision will be

made by NRC officials at a later time.

###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-01-030 June 14, 2001

CONTACT: Breck Henderson 

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH ENTERGY TO DISCUSS

SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT WATERFORD 3 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of Entergy Operations,

Inc. on Wednesday, June 20, to discuss the results of NRC's annual assessment of safety performance

at the Waterford 3 nuclear power plant near Taft, La.

The meeting will be held at 3 p.m. in the James M. Cain Energy Education Center, LA

Highway 3127, Killona, La.. The public is invited to observe the meeting. NRC officials will be

available after the meeting to answer questions.

A letter sent from NRC Region IV to Entergy, which addresses plant safety performance during

the previous year and forms the basis of the meeting discussion, is available from the Region IV Office

of Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr/. Current safety

performance information for Waterford 3 is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/WAT3/wat3_chart.html .

###
§ 206.32 Definitions applicable to subpart D. For the purposes of this subpart, the following terms have the meanings hereby assigned to them: ( a ) The term *substantial cause* has the same meaning as in section 202(b)(1)(B) of the Trade Act.
( b ) The terms *domestic industry, serious injury,* and *threat of serious injury* have the same meanings as in section 202(c)(6) of the Trade Act.
( c ) *Critical circumstances* mean such circumstances as are described in section 202(d) of the Trade Act;
( d ) *Perishable agricultural product* means any agricultural product or citrus product, including livestock, which is the subject of monitoring pursuant to section 202(d) of the Trade Act.
( e ) *Korean motor vehicle article* means a good provided for in heading 8703 or 8704 of the U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule that qualifies as an originating good under section 202(b) of the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act.
[77 FR 3926, Jan. 26, 2012, as amended at 77 FR 37805, June 25, 2012]
### SUBCHAPTER II—NATIONAL SOUND RECORDING PRESERVATION PROGRAM
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-072 June 12, 2001

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETINGS

ON DISCRIMINATION TASK GROUP DRAFT REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission Discrimination Task Group is holding a series of public

meetings nationwide this summer to solicit comments on draft recommendations contained in its

Discrimination Task Group Report. Designed to improve the agencyís handling of complaints by

nuclear industry workers who allege they have been discriminated against by their employer after

raising safety concerns, the draft report contains some 40 preliminary recommendations.

The NRC formed the Task Group last April to review the way the agency handles discrimination

complaints filed by nuclear industry workers and to recommend possible changes to the agencyís

regulations, enforcement policy, or other agency guidelines. After the series of public meetings is held,

the Task Group will develop final recommendations for the Commission to consider. 

 The public meetings will be held as follows:

-- June 25 at the NRCís Technical Training Center, Osborne Office Center, 7546 Marlin Road,

Chattanooga, TN., from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m.

-- July 11 at the agencyís Region III offices, 801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL., from 7 p.m. to 9

p.m.

-- July 12 in Paducah, KY., at the Paducah Community College Engineering Building, Crounse

Hall Main Lecture Hall, 4810 Alben Barkley Drive, Paducah, KY. The meeting will be held from 7

p.m. to 9 p.m.

-- August 9 at the San Luis Obispo Public Library, Library Conference Room, 995 Palm Street,

San Luis Obispo, CA., from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m.

-- August 14 at the Waterford Town Hall, 15 Rope Ferry Road, Waterford, CT., from 7 p.m. to 9

p.m. 

-- August 16 at the NRCís Two White Flint North building, at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,

MD., starting at 9:30 a.m. 
Further information regarding the draft report and schedule changes may be obtained via the

agencyís Office of Enforcement web site at http://www.nrc.gov/OE , or by contacting Barry Westreich

between 8 a.m. and 4:40 p.m. at 301-415-3456, e-mail at www.BCW@nrc.gov .

For those unable to attend one of the public meetings, comments on the draft may also 

be submitted by August 17 to the agencyís Office of Enforcement web site or in writing to Barry

Westreich, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 20555-

0001. 

###
### §5624. Transfer of positions in Corrections Calendar Office

(a)(1) Effective October 1, 2003—

(A) 3 of the positions in the Corrections Calendar Office, and the functions associated with such positions, shall be transferred to the Office of the Speaker; and

(B) 2 of the positions in the Corrections Calendar Office, and the functions associated with such positions, shall be transferred to the Office of the Minority Leader.

(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in the case of any individual who is an incumbent of a position transferred under paragraph (1) at the time of the transfer, the total number of days of annual leave and the total number of days of sick leave which were provided by the Corrections Calendar Office to the individual and which remain unused as of the date of the transfer shall remain available for the individual to use after the transfer.

(b) Effective with respect to fiscal year 2004 and each succeeding fiscal year, the lump sum allowance for salaries and expenses of the Corrections Calendar Office provided under House Resolution 130, One Hundred Fifth Congress, agreed to April 24, 1997, as enacted into permanent law by section 101 of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1998 (2 U.S.C. 74d–1 et seq.) [now 2 U.S.C. 5622 and 5623], is transferred as follows:

(1) 63.5 percent of such allowance shall be transferred to the Office of the Speaker.

(2) 36.5 percent of such allowance shall be transferred to the Office of the Minority Leader.

(Pub. L. 108–83, title I, §106, Sept. 30, 2003, 117 Stat. 1018.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified as a note under section 74d of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

Case No. 20-cv-81346-Matthewman

TOMAS MAIRENA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs. 

TRADESTAFF MANAGEMENT, INC.,

a Florida profit corporation, and

MITCHELL J. DAIGLE,

Defendants.

 _________/

ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT 

AGREEMENT AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [DE 6], APPROVING 

SETTLEMENT, AND DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of 

Parties’ Settlement Agreement and Dismissal with Prejudice (“Motion”) [DE 6]. In their Motion, 

the parties seek an Order approving their settlement and dismissing this action with prejudice. Id. 

Attached to the Motion are Plaintiffs’ counsel’s billing records [DE 6-1] and the executed 

Settlement Agreement and General Release [DE 6-2]. 

The Court held a fairness hearing via Zoom video teleconference (VTC) on October 6, 

2020, during which the Court heard from the parties’ counsel regarding the fairness of the 

settlement of Plaintiffs’ claims alleging violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 

U.S.C. § 201 et seq. At the hearing, the parties’ counsel represented that the settlement is fair and 

reasonable and that Plaintiffs and Defendants are in agreement with the terms of the settlement. 

The Court has reviewed the Motion, the parties’ Settlement Agreement and General

Release and the entire file in this case, has considered all of the factors outlined in Lynn’s Food 

KJZ Oct 7, 2020 West Palm Beach

Case 9:20-cv-81346-WM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/07/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F. 2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982), and is otherwise fully advised 

in the premises. The Court finds that the settlement in this case represents a genuine compromise 

of a bona fide dispute, with all parties represented by competent counsel. Plaintiffs are being paid 

an amount they believe they are owed well prior to the trial date. The parties have agreed to settle 

due to reasonable strategic and financial considerations. The Court further finds that the settlement, 

including the attorney’s fees and costs, reached by the parties represents a reasonable, arm’s length

compromise by both sides and is fair and reasonable. Based on the foregoing, it is hereby

ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Court finds the settlement of Plaintiffs’ FLSA claim as set forth in the settlement 

agreement between Plaintiffs and Defendants to be fair and reasonable. The Court also 

finds that the settlement meets the standard set forth in Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc.

Accordingly, the parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Parties’ Settlement Agreement and 

Dismissal with Prejudice [DE 6] is GRANTED.

2. The parties’ settlement is APPROVED.

3. The above-style action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Florida, this 7th day of 

October, 2020.

WILLIAM MATTHEWMAN 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 9:20-cv-81346-WM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/07/2020 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LACY LAMAR COLBERT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 32 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of May, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
### §1516. Authorizations

There are hereby authorized to be appropriated for loans under this subchapter not to exceed $5,000,000 for fiscal year 1981, and not to exceed $20,000,000 for each of the four succeeding fiscal years. Amounts so appropriated shall be deposited in the Geothermal Resources Development Fund for purposes of this subchapter, and shall remain available for such purposes until expended.

(Pub. L. 96–294, title VI, §616, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 765.)
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-067 June 1, 2001

NRC ISSUES ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR ALL NUCLEAR PLANTS

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued annual assessment letters for all operating

nuclear power plants and posted them to its web site.

The assessment letters sent to each licensee are available from the NRC Office of Public Affairs,

at http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr on the NRC web site, and through ADAMS, the Agencywide

Documents Access and Management System.

All commercial nuclear power plants (with the exception of the two D.C. Cook plants, due to

their extended shutdown) are now being evaluated under the revised reactor oversight process initiated

on April 2, 2000. The NRC expects to make additional refinements to the program based on lessons

learned from the first year of initial implementation.

The revised reactor oversight process reflects several important themes for all of NRC's

activities -- an even greater focus on safety, an effort to improve objectivity and timeliness, a

commitment to stakeholder involvement, and improved transparency of agency activities for both 

licensees and the general public.

As part of the new program, each plant will receive an assessment letter every six months: a

mid-cycle review letter and the annual assessment letter. Updated information on plant performance is

being posted to the NRC web site every quarter.

The NRC is in the process of aligning the inspection and assessment cycle with the calendar

year. In order to transition to a calendar year, the current inspection and assessment cycle will consist of

three quarters (the second, third and fourth calendar quarters of calendar year 2001). The next annual

assessment letters will be issued in March 2002, and the next mid-cycle review letters in September

2002.

Public meetings at each plant are planned. Details of the meetings, which will be open to the

public, will be announced as they are scheduled.

Details about plant performance can be found at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html on the NRC web site.

# # #
**Exhibit32**

 

**Section 906Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

 

The certification set forth below is being submittedin connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarterended September 27, 2003 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying withRule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the“Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code.

 

Anthony J. Cuti, the Chief Executive Officer and JohnK. Henry, the Chief Financial Officer of Duane Reade Inc., each certifies that,to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.                                       theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.                                       theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Duane Reade Inc.

 

 
|                               |   |   | /s/ Anthony J. Cuti     |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                               |   |   | Anthony J. Cuti         |   |
|                               |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                               |   |   |                    |   |
|                               |   |   |                    |   |
|                               |   |   | /s/ John K. Henry       |   |
|                               |   |   | John K. Henry           |   |
| Date:   November 7, 2003 |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.107

                AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT


                  This Amendment No. 1 to Securities Purchase Agreement, dated
as of December 9, 2002, shall serve to amend the Securities Purchase Agreement
(the "Agreement"), dated as of September 11, 2002, by and among Kanakaris
Wireless, a Nevada corporation with its headquarters located at 1280 Bison,
Suite B9-597, Newport Beach, California 92660, and each of the Buyers set forth
in the Agreement.

                  1. The undersigned parties hereby agree to amend Section 4(l)
of the Agreement to provide that the Buyers will fund the final $175,000 of the
subsequent investment referred to in that section on the date hereof, instead of
within ten (10) days following the Effective Date of the Registration Statement
(as defined in the Agreement).

                  2. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.







                            [Signature Page Follows]



<PAGE>

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

KANAKARIS WIRELESS


By:  /s/ Alex F. Kanakaris
     ---------------------------------------
         Alex F. Kanakaris
         President and Chief Executive Officer

AJW PARTNERS, LLC
By: SMS Group, LLC


By:  /s/ Corey S. Ribotsky
     ---------------------------------------
         Corey S. Ribotsky
         Manager

AJW OFFSHORE, LTD.
By:  First Street Manager II, LLC


By:  /s/ Corey S. Ribotsky
     ---------------------------------------
         Corey S. Ribotsky
         Manager

AJW QUALIFIED PARTNERS, LLC
By:  AJW Manager, LLC


By:  /s/ Corey S. Ribotsky
     ---------------------------------------
         Corey S. Ribotsky
         Manager
§ 162.76 Prepenalty notice for violations of sections 466 or 584(a)(1), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. ( a ) *When required.* If the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer has reasonable cause to believe that a violation of section 466 or 584(a)(1), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1466, 1584(a)(1)), has occurred and determines that further proceedings are warranted, he shall issue to the person concerned a written notice of his intent to issue a penalty claim or a claim of forfeiture, as appropriate.
( b ) *Contents* — ( 1 ) *Facts of violation.* The prepenalty notice shall: ( i ) Describe the merchandise, if applicable,
( ii ) Set forth the details of the error in the manifest, if applicable,
( iii ) Specify all laws and regulations allegedly violated,
( iv ) Describe all material facts and circumstances which establish the alleged violation, and
( v ) State the estimated loss of duties, if any, and, taking into account all circumstances, the amount of the proposed penalty claim or claim of forfeiture, as appropriate.
( 2 ) *Right to make presentation.* The prepenalty notice also shall inform the person of his right to make a written and an oral presentation within 30 days of the mailing of the notice (or such shorter period as may be prescribed under § 162.78) as to why a penalty claim or claim of forfeiture should not be issued or, if issued and it involves a monetary amount, why it should be in a lesser amount than proposed.
( c ) *Exception.* No prepenalty notice shall be issued if the proposed penalty for an alleged violation of 19 U.S.C. 1584(a)(1) is $1,000 or less.
[T.D. 79-160, 44 FR 31958, June 4, 1979, as amended by T.D. 99-27, 64 FR 13676, Mar. 22, 1999; CBP Dec. 04-28, 69 FR 52600, Aug. 27, 2004]
August 5, 2010, 2010 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Meeting with Senate Staff to discuss Biomass

FROM: Marc Thomas 

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery 

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329 

A meeting was held on August 3, 2010 between staff from the offices of Senators Merkley (OR), 

Shaheen (NH), and Stabenow (MI) and EPA staff to discuss how biomass would be affected by 

the recent proposed rules establishing emissions standards for boilers, process heaters, and 

certain solid waste incinerators under sections 112 and 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). EPA 

also gave an overview of how biomass is characterized in the proposed rule, “Identification of 

Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials that are Solid Wastes” (NHSM proposed rule). 

EPA provided the definition of clean cellulosic biomass, as stated in the preamble to the NHSM 

proposed rule (see 75 FR 31856) and discussed other types of biomass referenced in the 

proposal. As a follow-up to the meeting, EPA provided the relevant materials characterization 

papers that apply to biomass materials, which can be found at 

http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/define/index.htm. 

 

List of Meeting Attendees: 

Jeremiah Baumann, Senator Merkley (OR) 

Trent Bauserman, Senator Shaheen (NH) 

Chris Adamo, Senator Stabenow (MI) 

Matthew Vankuiken, Senator Stabenow (MI) 

Josh Lewis, EPA/OCIR 

Raquel Snyder, EPA/OCIR (by phone) 

Jim Berlow, EPA/ORCR 

Mimi Guernica, EPA/ORCR 

George Faison, EPA/ORCR 

Marc Thomas, EPA/ORCR 

Bob Wayland, EPA/OAQPS (by phone) 

Robin Dunkins, EPA/OAQPS (by phone) 

Jackie Ashley, EPA/OAQPS (by phone)
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle, IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. III-01-044 Sept. 19, 2001

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC ISSUES FINDING OF LOW TO MODERATE SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

ON FERMI NUCLEAR PLANT VIOLATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has determined that a violation of NRC regulations at the

Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Station should be characterized as ìwhite,î meaning that it is an issue of low to

moderate importance to safety. The plant, located in Newport, Michigan, is operated by Detroit Edison

Company.

The violation concerned a March 21 bearing failure on an emergency diesel generator during a

test. NRC staff members concluded that earlier modifications to the diesel generator caused the oil

level indicator to give an incorrect reading, which led to the inadequate lubrication and failure of the

bearing. The diesel generator is one of four at Fermi 2 which can supply power to plant safety systems

if there is a loss of offsite electrical power. The diesel generator was subsequently repaired.

Under the safety significance determination process, NRC officials classify certain conditions

at nuclear power plants as being one of four colors which delineate increasing levels of safety

significance, beginning with green and progressing to white, yellow or red.

A NRC inspection, completed June 30, reached a preliminary assessment of the bearing failure

as a ìwhiteî finding - one of low to moderate importance to safety. The letter transmitting the report

provided the company with an opportunity to either request a regulatory conference to discuss this

issue with NRC staff or to respond in writing. Detroit Edison officialsí response did not contest the

ìwhiteî characterization of the safety significance of this finding and officials chose not to meet with

the NRC staff.

On July 27, the NRC completed a supplemental inspection on this issue to review the bearing

problem further, and it was determined that the problem had been resolved.

In a September 14 letter to the company, Region III Administrator Jim Dyer said, ìThe

inspection (referring to the July 27 supplemental inspection) led to our conclusion that your

evaluations and corrective actions adequately addressed the identified root causes.î

# # #