alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 145.73 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart:

*Designated operator* means an entity officially designated by a member country of the UPU to operate postal services and fulfill its treaty obligations to the UPU. USPS is thus considered a designated operator for the United States.

*Express Mail Service* or *EMS* means the optional supplementary postal express service for documents and merchandise.

*International Mail Facility* or *IMF* means an official international mail processing center operated by CBP.

*Item ID* means the unique item identifier, in both human-readable and barcode format.

*Letter class mail—documents* means letter class (in UPU terms, letter post) mail containing only documents. Documents consist of any piece of written, drawn, printed or digital information, excluding objects of merchandise and may include M-Bags to the extent that such items do not contain goods.

*Letter class mail—goods* means letter class (in UPU terms, letter post) mail up to 2 kilograms containing goods, also referred to as “small packets”. Mail over 2 kilograms containing goods must use a postal service other than letter class.

*Parcel post* means any mail article mailed at the parcel rate or equivalent class or category of postage.

*Universal Postal Union* or *UPU* means the specialized agency of the United Nations that sets the rules for international postal service for member countries.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, WA 98101-3140

OFFICE OF AIR, WASTE AND TOXICS March 10,2014 Ms. BarbaraTrost Air and Water QualityDivision Alaska Department ofEnvironmental Conservation 555 Cordova Street Anchorage, AK 99501-2617

Dear Ms. Trost: EPA has evaluated the Alaska Department ofEnvironmental Conservation's (ADEC's) 2013 Ambient Air MonitoringNetwork Plan (Plan), which describes Alaska's ambient air monitoring network for 2013-14.
In the Plan, ADEC requested that the State or Local Air Monitoring Site (SLAMS) carbon monoxide (CO) monitor at the Fairbanks Old Post Office (OPO) site be discontinued because oflow CO values recorded at that location as compared to the NAAQS. ADEC requested that the current COmonitor at the Fairbanks National Core (NCore) site serve as a substitute. In the Plan, ADEC provided a correlation analysis, and a frequency distribution m,alysis of the CO values at the NCore and OPO sites to support its request. In a telephone conversation with you on October 31, 2013, EPA requested that the OPO CO monitor remain in place for another year ortwo to better detennine the correlationbetween the OPO site and the NCore site. You agreed to leave the OPO CO monitor in place for at least anothermonitoring season and to revisit this issue in the 2014 Alaska network plan. Therefore, EPA will take no further action on this request at this time. With this letter, EPA is approving the 2013 Planbecause it contains the necessary information about the network's existing and proposed sites, as specified at 40 C.F.R. § 58.10(b). Ifyouhave anyquestions about our approval ofthe 2013 Annual MonitoringNetwork Plan, please contact KeithRose at (206) 553-1949.

cc: ChrisHall, OEA Keith Rose, OAWT ClaudiaVaupel, OAWT

# ~6\_- rn\A- j

# v,, DebraM.

# Suz~ki,**~]g'~. ~**  Air Planning Unit



# -
#### Randall Truck Parts, Inc., Respondent, v. *“*John ” Howe et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Howe Bros., Defendants, and John Howe, Doing Business under the Name of *“*Howe Bros.”, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Yan Yoorhis, JJ.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 666 

To modify the criteria used by the Corps of Engineers to dredge small 

ports. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10, 2021 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To modify the criteria used by the Corps of Engineers to 

dredge small ports. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS CRI4 TERIA TO DREDGE SMALL PORTS. 

5 (a) MINIMUM TONNAGE REQUIREMENT.—Notwith6 standing any other provision of law (including regula7 tions), effective beginning on the date of enactment of this 

8 Act, the tonnage requirement with respect to the consider9 ation of dredging of small ports by the Corps of Engineers 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 666 IS

1 shall be a minimum of 500,000 tons, as calculated in ac2 cordance with subsection (b). 

3 (b) CALCULATION.—For purposes of subsection (a) 

4 and any other activity of the Corps of Engineers carried 

5 out on or after the date of enactment of this Act, tonnage 

6 shall be calculated by each relevant port authority and 

7 submitted to the Corps of Engineers. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-03-002 January 16, 2003

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: opa2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $3,000 CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST PUERTO RICO FIRM

FOR VIOLATION OF NRC RADIATION SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $3,000 civil penalty against Rio

Construction Corporation of Caparra Heights, Puerto Rico, for violation of NRC safety requirements

related to the use of licensed radioactive material.

 In a letter to the company, Luis A. Reyes, Administrator of the NRC’s Region II office in Atlanta, 

said that, between January and March of 2001, an individual used a soil moisture density gauge

containing licensed radioactive material approximately twice per week without having received

adequate, required radiation safety training and without being under the supervision and in the

physical presence of authorized users.

 Reyes said no actual radiological consequences occurred as a result of the violation, but that the

civil penalty was being proposed because of the deliberate nature of the violation and to “emphasize

the importance of prompt identification of issues and compliance with regulatory requirements.” 

 The NRC’s letter, its enclosures and the company’s response will be made available to interested

members of the public through the agency’s public electronic reading room at

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ADAMS.html . Help in accessing the document is available from the

NRC Public Document Room at 301 415-4737 or at 1-800-397-4209.

 The company has 30 days from receipt of the letter to either pay the civil penalty or to protest its

imposition. 

###
### §681. Disclaimer

Nothing contained in this Act, or in any amendments made by this Act, shall be construed as—

(1) asserting or conceding the constitutional powers or limitations of either the Congress or the President;

(2) ratifying or approving any impoundment heretofore or hereafter executed or approved by the President or any other Federal officer or employee, except insofar as pursuant to statutory authorization then in effect;

(3) affecting in any way the claims or defenses of any party to litigation concerning any impoundment; or

(4) superseding any provision of law which requires the obligation of budget authority or the making of outlays thereunder.

(Pub. L. 93–344, title X, §1001, July 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 332.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in provision preceding par. (1), means Pub. L. 93–344, July 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 297, known as the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, which enacted chapters 17, 17A, and 17B, and section 190a–3 of this title and sections 11a, 11c, 11d, 1020a of former Title 31, amended sections 11, 665, 701, 1020, 1151, 1152, 1153, and 1154 of former Title 31, section 105 of Title 1, General Provisions, sections 190b and 190d of this title, repealed sections 571 and 581c–1 of former Title 31 and sections 66 and 81 of this title, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 190a–1, 621, 632, and 682 of this title, section 105 of Title 1, and section 1020 of former Title 31. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 621 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1400 of Title 31 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 31, Money and Finance, by Pub. L. 97–258, §1, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 877.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Chapter effective July 12, 1974, see section 905(a) of Pub. L. 93–344, formerly set out as a note under section 621 of this title.

#### Short Title of 1996 Amendment

Pub. L. 104–130, §1, Apr. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 1200, which provided that Pub. L. 104–130 (enacting former subchapter III (§691 et seq.) of this chapter and provisions set out as a note under section 691 of this title and amending provisions set out as notes under section 621 of this title) could be cited as the "Line Item Veto Act", was omitted pursuant to section 5 of Pub. L. 104–130, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates note under section 691 of this title.

#### Short Title

For short title of title X of Pub. L. 93–344, which enacted this chapter, as the "Impoundment Control Act of 1974", see section 1(a) of Pub. L. 93–344, as amended, set out as a note under section 621 of this title.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 2, 2005 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and2)
    
    the information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending October 2, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Michael M. RajkovicMichael M. RajkovicExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial OfficerDated: November 16, 2005
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93021, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 151.68 Merchandise to be sampled and tested by Customs. The following shall be weighed, sampled, and tested for clean yield, unless such sampling or testing is not feasible: ( a ) All importation of wool or hair subject to duty at a rate per clean kilogram, except importations entered directly for manipulation under the provisions of section 562, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1562), or for manufacture under the provisions of section 311, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1311);
( b ) All imported wool or hair manipulated under the provisions of section 562, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1562) and dutiable after manipulation as wool or hair at a rate per clean kilogram; and
( c ) Such other imported wool or hair as an authorized CBP official may designate.
[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17470, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51269, Dec. 21, 1988]
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Growth Properties, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John
Bucksbaum, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
      (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

/s/: John Bucksbaum
---------------------------
John Bucksbaum
Chief Executive Officer
May 7, 2004

<PAGE>

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Growth Properties, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bernard
Freibaum, in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
      (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

/s/: Bernard Freibaum
------------------------------
Bernard Freibaum
Chief Financial Officer
May 7, 2004
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-03-026 June 17, 2003

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC PROPOSES $6,000 FINE

FOR NONDESTRUCTIVE & VISUAL INSPECTION, INC. OF HARVEY, LA.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a fine of $6,000 against

Nondestructive and Visual Inspection, Inc. of Harvey, Louisiana for violating NRC

administrative and radioactive material handling requirements.

In a letter to the company, Thomas P. Gwynn, Acting Administrator of the NRC’s Region

IV office in Arlington, Texas, said that as a result of an NRC inspection that ended on March 6,

the agency determined that the company violated NRC requirements associated with the control

of radioactive materials. During an inspection conducted in offshore federal waters in the Gulf

of Mexico, an NRC inspector found the company failed to “control and maintain constant

surveillance over an industrial radiographic exposure device in an unrestricted area.”

“Our review found that the radiographer and his assistant were eating lunch and neither

were in direct visual sight of the device when the inspector arrived on the platform,” Gwynn said. 

 The radiographer and his assistant “stated that, on the day of the inspection, they got distracted

and forgot to put the device into the dark room when they went to lunch.” Radiography is a

nondestructive method which uses a sealed radiation source to make x-ray images of heavy metal

objects like pumps, valves and pipes. 

 The company has taken corrective actions by discussing the incident with other

radiographers to stress the importance of securing industrial radiographic devices and of

following radiation safety requirements, disciplining the radiographer, making sure all dark

rooms have a storage area for the device, discussing with its clients the importance of having the

darkroom on the same platform where work is being performed or of having a storage box 
- 2 -

available for securing the device, and increasing onsite surveillance of the safety practices of its

radiographers.

The NRC has classified the one violation as a Severity Level III violation, which carries a

$6,000 fine. The agency uses a four-level severity scale in which Severity Level I is the most

serious. The company has 30 days from receipt of the letter to either pay the civil penalty or to

challenge the proposed fine

The NRC’s letter, its enclosures, and the company’s response will be made available to

interested members of the public through the agency’s public electronic reading room at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Help in accessing these documents is available from

the NRC Public Document Room at (301) 415-4737 or at 1-800-397-4209.

###
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-96-55 September 17, 1996

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO CONDUCT INDEPENDENT SAFETY INSPECTION

AT DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will conduct an

Independent Safety Inspection beginning September 30 to evaluate

the performance of the Dresden Nuclear Power Station. The

Dresden Station, operated by Commonwealth Edison Company, is near

Morris, Illinois.

The 20-member inspection team will meet at 10 a.m. September

30 with representatives of Commonwealth Edison to open the onsite

phase of the inspection. This meeting is open to public

observation. It will be in the Training Building at the Dresden

plant, which is located on Dresden Road just north of Lorenzo

Road in Grundy County, Illinois.

The Dresden Station has been on the NRC's "Watch List" of

nuclear power plants with performance problems since 1992. It

also was on the "Watch List" in 1987 and 1988.

This special independent team inspection will evaluate the

current performance of the Dresden Station and the effectiveness

of corrective actions taken by the utility. It will also focus

on the maintenance activities and the conformance of the plant to

design and licensing criteria. The findings of the team will

provide a basis for further NRC actions, including the next

"Watch List" review in January 1997.

The Independent Safety Inspection Team is headed by Samuel

J. Collins, who is Deputy Regional Administrator of the NRC's

Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas. Arthur T. Howell, Deputy

Director of the Division of Reactor Projects in Region IV, has

been designated as team leader. The team members are drawn from

NRC personnel who have not had recent regulatory responsibilities

for the Dresden facility. The team also includes several outside

consultants.

The inspection schedule calls for the team to be onsite

September 30 - October 11 and October 28 - November 8. The team

will present its findings in a meeting, open to the public, in
December. The schedule for the meeting will be announced later.

A written report will be issued following the meeting.

#####
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-064 May 25, 2001

 NRC SENDS SPECIAL INSPECTION TEAM 

 TO WESTINGHOUSE FUEL FABRICATION FACILITY IN COLUMBIA, S.C. 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has sent a special inspection team to Westinghouseís fuel

fabrication facility in Columbia, South Carolina, to inspect the circumstances surrounding the failure of

several valves to close to a fail-safe position. The valves control the flow of uranium hexifluoride gas

and water in the process steps which convert this gas into solid uranium dioxide, which is used to make

fuel pellets. After the failure was identified, the system was shut down and corrective action initiated. 

There were no releases of nuclear materials into the environment or inside the facility. The facility is

currently being maintained in a safe condition. 

The agency routinely sends inspectors to facilities that experience an unusual failure of safety

equipment in order to understand the malfunction fully. In this case, the NRC already had a safety

inspection at the site at the time the event occurred. Following the event, as the NRC and the licensee

learned more about the malfunction, the agency sent a team of three additional inspectors with various

fields of expertise to supplement the ongoing inspection. They will evaluate the efforts of

Westinghouse to determine the cause of the malfunction and will assess the actions to correct the

problem. Their inspection should last several days.

The NRC team will issue a written report, which will be available to the public, within 30 days

after completion of the inspection. 

###
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Global
Industries, Ltd.'s financial statements for the six-months ended 
September 30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                            6,337
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                    54,782
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 96,462
<PP&E>                          158,228
<DEPRECIATION>                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  274,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            46,222
<BONDS>                          54,962
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                            381
<OTHER-SE>                      155,424
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    274,887
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                122,763
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    88,626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  453
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  27,326
<INCOME-TAX>                      8,166
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              19,160
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     19,160
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0
        

</TABLE>
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-141 December 9, 2002

NRC FINDS NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FROM EXTENDED 

 OPERATION OF SURRY AND NORTH ANNA NUCLEAR PLANTS

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued its final environmental impact statements

on the proposed renewal of the operating licenses of the Surry and North Anna nuclear power plants. In

the reports, the NRC staff found that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal for the

plants are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decision makers

would be unreasonable.

The current operating licenses for Surry, Units 1 and 2, located 17 miles northwest of Newport

News, Virginia, in Surry County, will expire on May 25, 2012, and January 29, 2013, respectively. 

The current operating licenses for North Anna, Units 1 and 2, located 40 miles northwest of

Richmond, Virginia, in Louisa County, will expire on April 1, 2018, and August 21, 2020, respectively. 

Dominion Generation submitted its application for license renewal of the Surry and North Anna

plants on May 29, 2001.

As part of its environmental review of the applications, the NRC held public meetings near both 

plants concerning the scope of the review and a draft version of the environmental impact statement for

each plant. Comments were received from members of the public, local officials and representatives of

other agencies.

The reports are available electronically on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html through the NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and

Management System (ADAMS). Help in using ADAMS is available by contacting the NRC Public

Document Room staff at 301/415-4737 or 1/800/397-4209, or by sending a message to

pdr@nrc.gov via e-mail. The reports also are available for public inspection at the NRC’s Public

Document Room, located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

###