alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Delco Remy International, Inc. (Delaware)
     Delco Remy America, Inc. (Delaware)
          Delco Remy International (Europe) GmbH (Germany)
     Reman Holdings, Inc. (Delaware)
          Nabco, Inc. (Michigan)
          The A & B Group, Inc. (Mississippi)
               A & B Cores, Inc. (Mississippi)
               A & B Enterprises, Inc. (Mississippi)
               Dalex, Inc. (Mississippi)
               MCA, Inc. of Mississippi (Mississippi)
               R & L Tool Company, Inc. (Mississippi)
          Power Investments, Inc. (Indiana)
               Western Reman, Inc. (Indiana)
               Franklin Power Products, Inc. (Indiana)
               International Fuel Systems, Inc. (Indiana)
               Marine Corporation of America (Indiana)
               Power Marine, Inc. (New Jersey)
               Powrbilt Products, Inc. (Texas)
               Power Investments Canada Ltd. (Alberta)
               Alberta Ltd. (Alberta)
                    Central Precision (1988) Limited (Canada)
                    Western Reman Ltd. (Canada)
                    Alvin Morris Holdings Ltd. (Alberta)
                         Morris Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (Alberta)
                         Engine Rebuilders Ltd. (Alberta)
                              Reman Transport Ltd. (Alberta)
          World Wide Automotive Inc. (Virginia)
               Publitech, Inc. (Virginia)
               World Wide Automotive Distributors, Inc. (Virginia)
     Remy International, Inc. (Delaware)
          Autovill Holdings, Inc. (Delaware)
          Remy Components Holdings, Inc. (Delaware)
          Remy India Holdings, Inc. (Delaware)
          Remy Korea Holdings, Inc. (Delaware)
               Remy Korea LTD (Korea)
          Delco Remy International Limited (Barbados)
          Remy South America Holdings, Inc. (Delaware)
          Remy Holdings Limited (United Kingdom)
               Remy UK Limited (United Kingdom)
               Autovill Rt. (Hungary)
               Remy Holdings do Brasil Ltda. (Brazil)
                    Delco Remy Brazil, Ltda. (Brazil)
               Remy Auto Parts Holdings B.V. (Netherlands)
                    Delco Remy Holding Belgium bvba (Belgium)
                         Delco Remy Belgium bvba (Belgium)
                              Electro Diesel Rebuild bvba
                              Electro-Rebuild Tunisie S.A.R.L. (Tunisia)
                    Remy Mexico Holdings, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Mexico)
                         Delco Remy Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Mexico)
                         Remy Mexico Services, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Mexico)
                         Remy Componentes S. De  R.L. de C.V. (Mexico)
     Ballantrae Corporation
          Kraftube, Inc. (Michigan)
          Tractech, Inc. (Delaware)
               Trachech, Inc. Limited (Ireland)
     A.P. Acquisition (Delaware)
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0330 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-116-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5319 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5319

    To establish procedures for the removal of the Architect of the 
                                Capitol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 20, 2022

  Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Blunt) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To establish procedures for the removal of the Architect of the 
                                Capitol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF THE ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL.

    Section 319 of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1990 (2 
U.S.C. 1801) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Removal.--The Architect of the Capitol may be removed at any 
time by--
            ``(1) impeachment; or
            ``(2) joint resolution of Congress, only for--
                    ``(A) permanent disability;
                    ``(B) inefficiency;
                    ``(C) neglect of duty;
                    ``(D) malfeasance; or
                    ``(E) a felony or conduct involving moral 
                turpitude.''.
                                 <all>
```
### §275. Laws applicable

The general provisions of sections 181 to 184, 185 to 188, 189 to 192, 193, and 194 1 of this title, are made applicable to permits and leases under this subchapter, sections 181 and 193 of this title being amended to include deposits of sulphur, and section 184 of this title being amended so as to prohibit any person, association, or corporation from taking or holding more than three sulphur permits or leases in any one State during the life of such permits or leases.

(Apr. 17, 1926, ch. 158, §5, 44 Stat. 302.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 194 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 644.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which comprises this chapter.

1 See References in Text note below.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

www.nrc.gov/OPA/

No. 96-67 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, May 10, 1996)

NRC PROPOSES AMENDMENTS TO FITNESS-FOR-DUTY RULE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission proposes to amend its

fitness-for-duty rule, which requires NRC licensees to take steps

to deter and detect substance abuse.

The proposed revisions would take into account experience

gained in implementing the rule, new developments in the

substance abuse area, and related actions by other government

agencies.

Although the experience gained since it took effect in June

1989 shows that the rule is fundamentally sound, the proposed

amendments would enhance the effectiveness of licensees' fitnessfor-duty programs and reduce some unnecessary testing burdens on

licensees, without decreasing protection of the public health and

safety afforded by the rule.

As proposed, the amendments would:

--Adopt changes the Department of Health and Human Services

made in 1994 to its testing guidelines, particularly in

tightening the standard for passing screening tests for

marijuana.

--Add licensee fitness-for-duty personnel to the testing

pool, since a few licensees are not now testing such employees.

--Require licensees to review and, in some cases, make minor

revisions to their written policies, procedures and technical

standards.

--Accept testing results from other Federal, State and

licensee programs to eliminate duplicate testing.

--Initiate follow-up testing of personnel who are returned

to service after substance abuse rehabilitation and adopt a

specified frequency of such testing over a three-year period.
--Permit applicants for unescorted access to a licensee's

site to appeal the results of a substance abuse test.

--Require certain measures to prevent "subversion" (attempts

to avoid detection) of the testing process and implement measures

to detect such attempts.

--Adopt the same sanctions for alcohol abuse as currently

exist for use of illegal drugs.

--Reduce the number of days between collection and testing

of urine specimens.

--Permit licensees to reduce the rate of blind performance

tests (specimens that are blank or spiked to challenge a

laboratory's testing ability to ensure the validity of test

results).

--Reduce the frequency of employee training in fitness-forduty policy.

Written comments on the proposed amendments to Part 26 of

the NRC's regulations should be received by August 7. The

comments should be addressed to the Secretary of the Commission,

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001,

Attention: Docketing and Service Branch.

####
DM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 18-0428

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM MEALER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 60-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including June 1, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 26 2020

03/26/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0428
Internet Archive's Wayback Machine

Loading...

http://www.aphis.usda.gov/publications/animal_health/content/printable_version/faq_ahbioterr.pdf | 22:52:08 Oct 17, 2010

Got an HTTP 302 response at crawl time

Redirecting to...

http://www.aphis.usda.gov/404.shtml

Impatient?

The Wayback Machine is an initiative of the Internet Archive, a 501(c)(3) non-profit, building a digital library of Internet sites and other cultural artifacts in digital form.Other projects include Open Library & archive-it.org.

Your use of the Wayback Machine is subject to the Internet Archive's Terms of Use.
### §6538. Employment of additional administrative assistants

The Secretary of the Senate is authorized to employ such administrative assistants as may be necessary in order to carry out the provisions of this Act under the jurisdiction of the Secretary.

(Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title II, §244, 60 Stat. 839; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §204(18), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1732.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, means act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, 60 Stat. 812, known as the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 74b of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "is" for "and the Clerk of the House are" and "the jurisdiction of the Secretary" for "their respective jurisdictions".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Aug. 2, 1946, see section 245 of act Aug. 2, 1946, set out as a note under section 4301 of this title.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on July 13, 2004, National Center for Development of Natural Products, The University of Mississippi, 135 Coy Waller Lab Complex, University, Mississippi 38677, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed: Drug
ScheduleMarihuana (7360)
ITetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
I
 The company plans to bulk manufacture for product development. Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such a substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 C.F.R. 1301.33(a). Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
                    ( print page 62296)
                    Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA 
                    **Federal Register**
                    Representative (CCD) and must be filed no later than December 27, 2004. Dated: October 18, 2004. William J. Walker, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 04-23768 Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1529 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1529

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 11, 2003

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend title 11 of the United States Code with respect to the 
                dismissal of certain involuntary cases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Involuntary Bankruptcy Improvement 
Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 303 of title 11, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(l)(1) If--
            ``(A) the petition under this section is false or contains 
        any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement;
            ``(B) the debtor is an individual; and
            ``(C) the court dismisses such petition;
the court, upon motion of the debtor, shall expunge from the records of 
the court such petition, all the records relating to such petition in 
particular, and all references to such petition.
    ``(2) If the debtor is an individual and the court dismisses a 
petition under this section, the court may enter an order prohibiting 
all consumer reporting agencies (as defined in section 603 of the Fair 
Credit Reporting Act) from making any consumer report (as defined in 
section 603 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act) that contains any 
information relating to such petition or to the case commenced by the 
filing of such petition.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Board Member Retirement Process



  
 EXHIBIT 10.91 
  
 Board Member Retirement Process 
  
 Microsemi Corporation Board of Directors 
 Approved by vote of the board—May 14, 2002 
  
 At time of retirement from the Board or if a Board Member does not stand for re-election, the board member will be afforded the opportunity to: 

 

	 	Ø
	 
	Receive one half (50%) of the quarterly board retainer they were being paid at the time of their retirement from the board. This retainer will be paid quarterly
for a period of seven (7) years following their retirement for the board; 
 

  

	 	o
	 
	As part of receiving this retainer the “retired” board member agrees to provide up to 25 hours per quarter of consulting support on projects assigned
to them by the President/CEO. 
 

  

	 	o
	 
	Any additional consulting support in excess of twenty-five hours per quarter can be billed to the company at a rate of $250 per hour. Maximum billing during any
single year is $50,000. 
 

  

	 	o
	 
	Retainer payments will crease the first day of the quarter following the date a retired board member is unable to fulfill their “consulting support”
responsibilities 
 

  

	 	Ø
	 
	Continue the right to exercise any vested stock options for a term of seven years following the effective date of the individual’s retirement from the
board or the normal expiration date of the stock option, whichever occurs first. 
 

  

	 	o
	 
	Any outstanding stock options will expire 90 days following the date a retired board member is unable to fulfill the above mentioned consulting arrangement.

 

  

	 	o
	 
	Nothing in this process extends the expiration date of any stock option beyond the original expiration date of the stock option agreement. 



  

	 	Ø
	 
	In order to be eligible for this retirement benefit, the board member must have served as a member of the Microsemi Corporation Board of Directors for a period
of not less than five years. 
 

  

	 	Ø
	 
	This process is effective December 1, 2001.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INDICATED BELOW AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       6,623,907
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,646,304
<PP&E>                                         810,693
<DEPRECIATION>                                 180,108
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              86,571,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,605,403
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,465
<OTHER-SE>                                  79,955,686
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                86,571,554
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,885
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (11,831,260)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,831,260)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,831,260)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.43)


</TABLE>
### SUBCHAPTER III—EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ASSISTANCE FOR DISLOCATED WORKERS
### §72a–1c. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–26, title I, §106(f), May 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 84

Section, Pub. L. 94–59, title I, §108, July 25, 1975, 89 Stat. 276; Pub. L. 94–440, title I, §102, Oct. 1, 1976, 90 Stat. 1443, authorized Senators to hire staff assistance in connection with their committee memberships. See section 4332 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 95–26, title I, §106(g)(1), May 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 84, which provided that the repeal is effective Mar. 1, 1977, was repealed by Pub. L. 95–94, title I, §111(e)(1), Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 663.
#### Margaret Theissig v. The City of New York.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 209

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 154

[Report No. 108–359] 

To exclude certain properties from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 

Resources System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Mr. PAUL (for himself and Mr. HALL) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Resources 

NOVEMBER 17, 2003 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on January 7, 2003] 

A BILL

To exclude certain properties from the John H. Chafee 

Coastal Barrier Resources System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 154 RH 

1 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL 

2 BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The map described in subsection 

4 (b) is replaced by the map entitled ‘‘John H. Chafee Coastal 

5 Barrier Resources System Matagorda Peninsula Unit T07/

6 T07P’’ and dated July 12, 2002. 

7 (b) DESCRIPTION OF REPLACED MAP.—The map re8 ferred to in subsection (a) is the map relating to the John 

9 H. Chafee Coastal Barrier System unit designated as Coast10 al Barrier Resources System Matagorda Peninsula Unit 

11 T07/T07P that is subtitled ‘‘T07/T07P’’ and included in 

12 the set of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’ 

13 and referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Re14 sources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)). 

15 (c) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 

16 keep the replacement map referred to in subsection (a) on 

17 file and available for inspection in accordance with section 

18 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 

19 3503(b)). 

Union Calendar No. 209

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 154

[Report No. 108–359] 

A BILL

To exclude certain properties from the John H. 

Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System. 

NOVEMBER 17, 2003

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 

and ordered to be printed