alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 181
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 181 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93026, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 181.98 Situations in which no NAFTA advance ruling may be issued. ( a ) *General.* No advance ruling letter will be issued in response to a request therefor which fails to comply with the provisions of this subpart. No advance ruling letter will be issued in regard to a completed transaction.
( b ) *Pending matters.* Where a request for an advance ruling involves an issue that is under review in connection with an origin verification under subpart G of this part or that is the subject of an administrative review procedure provided for in subpart J of this part or in part 174 of this chapter, Customs may decline to issue the requested advance ruling. In addition, no NAFTA advance ruling letter will be issued with respect to any issue which is pending before the United States Court of International Trade, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, or any court of appeal therefrom. Litigation before any other court will not preclude the issuance of an advance ruling letter, provided neither Customs nor any of its officers or agents is named as a party to the action.
CERTIFICATION OF  PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Industries, Ltd. ("Global") on Form10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on August 13, 2003 (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
SS 1350 as adopted pursuant to SS 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge based upon a review of the Report, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global as of the dates and for periods presented as required by such Report.





|/S/ TIMOTHY W. MICIOTTO
|-----------------------
|Timothy W. Miciotto    
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 8, 2003         



This certification is provided pursuant to SS 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Global or the certifying officer for purposes of
SS 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by SS 906 has been provided to Global Industries, Ltd.
and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7527

GREGORY K. CLINTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

MR. HUDGINS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:20-cv-00073-GMG-RWT)

Submitted: December 22, 2020 Decided: December 29, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory K. Clinton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gregory K. Clinton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to 

recuse the district court judge presiding over his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. This 

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Clinton seeks to 

appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Clinton’s motion for 

allocution and request for a hearing and deny as moot Clinton’s motion to expedite and for 

release pending resolution of this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 148.32 Vehicles, aircraft, boats, teams and saddle horses taken abroad. ( a ) *Admission free of duty.* Automobiles and other vehicles, aircraft, boats, teams and saddle horses, together with their accessories, taken abroad for noncommercial use and returned by a returning resident will be admitted free of duty upon being satisfactorily identified.
( b ) *Identification of articles taken abroad.* Upon the request of the owner or his agent, the port director will cause any article described in paragraph (a) of this section to be examined before it is taken abroad, and will issue a certificate of registration therefor on CBP Form 4455, or its electronic equivalent. On the return of the article, the certificate may be accepted as satisfactory identification of the described article for the purpose of admitting the article free of duty. In lieu of CBP Form 4455, or its electronic equivalent, the following may be accepted as satisfactory identification of such articles taken abroad: ( 1 ) For an automobile, the State registration card;
( 2 ) For an aircraft, the certificate of registration issued by the Federal Aviation Administration; and
( 3 ) For a pleasure boat, the yacht license or motorboat identification certificate.
( c ) *Repairs, alterations, and accessories.* Repairs made abroad to articles described in paragraph (a) of this section, if incidental to use abroad, are not subject to duty. Repairs not incidental to use abroad, and alterations and additions made abroad, will be assessed with duty upon their value at the rate at which the article itself would be dutiable if imported. Accessories for articles described in paragraph (a) of this section which are acquired abroad are dutiable as if separately imported. Any accessories, repairs, alterations, or additions, which accompany the returning resident at the time of his return to the United States must be included in his baggage declaration.
( d ) *Entry.* Entry on a baggage declaration or regular entry (see § 148.5) will be required if: ( 1 ) The owner or his agent is unable to produce a proper registration card or certificate to cover the article;
( 2 ) A claim for free entry of repairs, alterations, additions, or accessories is to be made under the $800 or $1,600 returning resident's exemption for articles acquired abroad; or
( 3 ) Duty is to be collected.
[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. 86-118, 51 FR 22516, June 20, 1986; T.D. 97-75, 62 FR 46441, Sept. 3, 1997; CBP Dec. 09-37, 74 FR 48854, Sept. 25, 2009; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61291, Oct. 13, 2015]
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

John Wesley Carter, Appellant

No. 06

- 18

- 00124

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 159th District Court of Angelina County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2017

- 0242 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, John Wesley Carter, has adequately indicated his inability to
pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 7 , 2019 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
|  |
|--|

|  |  |
|--|--|

| ** ** |
|------------|

|   | ****Bertolt Brecht**** 
369 pages

1940's internal security investigation of Bertolt Brecht, author and poet, due to his affiliation with Soviet officials and other known communists.

**Part 1a****Part 1b****Part 1c****Part 1d**

Introduction
Reading Room Index - A   B   C   D   E    F   G- H   I    J    K   L   M   N   -O   P   Q   R   S   T   U-V   W   X   Y   Z   
Electronic Reading Room
- Alphabetical Listing- Espionage-Famous Persons-Gangster Era- Historical Interest- Unusual Phenomena-Violent CrimeFBI              File Fact Sheet FOIA Request Instructions- FOIA Request Form - Privacy Waiver and Certificate of Identity Form Privacy Act Instructions- Privacy Act Request FormDOJ              Reference GuideU.S.              DOJ FOIASearch
All of these publications are in PDF (Portable Document Format). To view them you will need to have the Adobe Acrobat Reader plug-in installed on your computer. The Reader can be downloaded at no cost from Adobe's site on the World Wide Web.   If you have difficulty accessing any material on this site because of a disability, please contact us in writing or via telephone and we will work with you to make the information available.

Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Section    202-324-5520 |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          73,616
<SECURITIES>                                     9,581
<RECEIVABLES>                                  144,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (134,500)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               964,692
<PP&E>                                       4,806,758
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,651,797)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,791,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,114,579
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,740,000
<COMMON>                                           648
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,310,430
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,791,014
<SALES>                                        122,650
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,650
<CGS>                                        1,135,241
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,266,622
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             217,769
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,362,458)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    80,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,282,458)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,282,458)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.35)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FILED AS
PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       6,191,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,000,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,950,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,547,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,936,000
<PP&E>                                      16,278,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,451,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,102,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,095,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,920,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,102,000
<SALES>                                     15,616,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,616,000
<CGS>                                       14,910,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,910,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,557,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               250,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,648,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,648,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,648,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)
        

</TABLE>
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. III-03-010 March 18, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC ISSUES MASTER MATERIALS LICENSE TO DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS FOR ITS MEDICAL FACILITIES ACROSS THE NATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a master materials license to the U. S.

Department of Veterans Affairs to take over principal regulatory functions for its medical facilities

throughout the United States.

Previously, 116 VA medical facilities were each licensed separately by the NRC for various

uses of radioactive materials for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases. The new master materials

license, encompassing those facilities previously licensed by the NRC, will be administered by the

NRC’s Region III Office in Lisle, Illinois.

The VA’s program will be managed by its National Health Physics Program staff, located in

North Little Rock, Arkansas. The VA license is the third of its type issued by the NRC. The

Departments of the Navy and the Air Force also hold master materials licenses for the use of

radioactive materials.

Under the new license, the VA will manage permits for each of its facilities, setting specific

requirements for the uses of radioactive materials. The facilities will continue to operate within the

rules and regulations of the NRC. 

The VA will conduct its own inspections to make certain that its medical facilities are

complying with NRC regulations and with the terms of the VA-issued permits. It will also take

enforcement action if violations of requirements are identified. The NRC, however, will retain the

authority to take enforcement action, if appropriate.

During the first two years, the NRC will conduct semiannual evaluations of the VA’s

performance under the master materials license. Then, the NRC will consider reducing its oversight to

yearly evaluations.

In addition to these broad assessments, the NRC will continue to conduct independent

inspections of a sample of VA medical facilities and, in some cases, accompany VA personnel on

inspections.

# # #
|  |
|--|

|  |  |
|--|--|

| ** ** |
|------------|

|   | ****Francis Cardinal Spellman**** 
536 pages

Cordial correspondence between the Cardinal and the FBI and records concerning a 1962 bombing of the Cardinal's residence (no injuries).

**Part 01**
**Part 02**
**Part 03**
**Part 04**
**Part 05**

Introduction
Reading Room Index - A   B   C   D   E    F   G- H   I    J    K   L   M   N   -O   P   Q   R   S   T   U-V   W   X   Y   Z   
Electronic Reading Room
- Alphabetical Listing- Espionage-Famous Persons-Gangster Era- Historical Interest- Unusual Phenomena-Violent CrimeFBI              File Fact Sheet FOIA Request Instructions- FOIA Request Form - Privacy Waiver and Certificate of Identity Form Privacy Act Instructions- Privacy Act Request FormDOJ              Reference GuideU.S.              DOJ FOIASearch
All of these publications are in PDF (Portable Document Format). To view them you will need to have the Adobe Acrobat Reader plug-in installed on your computer. The Reader can be downloaded at no cost from Adobe's site on the World Wide Web.   If you have difficulty accessing any material on this site because of a disability, please contact us in writing or via telephone and we will work with you to make the information available.

Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Section    202-324-5520 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LEWIS P. WILLIAMS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3710

[February 15, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 97-15927CF10A.

Lewis P. Williams, Clermont, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 191.93 Combined applications.

An applicant for the procedures provided for in §§ 191.91 and 191.92 of this subpart may apply for only one procedure, both procedures separately, or both procedures in one application package (see also § 191.195 of this part regarding combined applications for certification in the drawback compliance program and waiver of prior notice and/or approval of accelerated payment of drawback). In the latter instance, the intent to apply for both procedures must be clearly stated. In all instances, all of the requirements for the procedure(s) applied for must be met (for example, in a combined application for both procedures, all of the information required for each procedure, all required sample documents for each procedure, and all required certifications must be included in and with the application).
#### Margaret Shanley, Respondent, v. James Shanley, Appellant.

On motions of this character, the relevant statutes do not make the taking of oral proof before the court or an official referee a prerequisite to the granting of relief. (Civ. Prae. Act, §§ 467, 1172-a; Judiciary Law, §§ 772, 770, 756.) Ordinarily, of course, if a dispute arises as to the material facts, it is the preferable and common practice to direct a reference to an official referee to hear and report before any final determination is made by the court. *(Staehr*v. *Staehr,*269 App. Div. 762; *Nabut*v. *Nabut,*271 App. Div. 935; *Rolfo*v. *Rolfo,*271 App. Div. 892; *Hendrickson*v. *Hendrickson,*268 App. Div. 1045.) But this practice is not mandatory, inflexible or invariable. When a hearing has been had, upon which the facts are clearly established by affidavits, and by the record of the prior *776proceedings, as they are here, the court may, and from time to time does, finally determine the motion, without taking testimony or directing a reference for that purpose. *(Myers*v. *Myers,*252 App. Div. 768; *Hendrickson*v. *Hendrickson,*266 App. Div. 1011.) In such case a reference would merely delay unnecessarily the final decision. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 21



|                                           |  |                             
|------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------
|Name                                       |  | Jurisdiction of Organization
|Carey Agri International Poland Sp. z o.o. |  | Poland                      
|Multi Trade Company Sp. z o.o.             |  | Poland                      
|Piwnica Wybornych Win Sp. z o.o.           |  | Poland                      
|Polskie Hurtownie Alkoholi Sp. z o.o.      |  | Poland                      
|Astor Sp. z o.o.                           |  | Poland                      
|Damianex S.A.                              |  | Poland                      
|Agis S.A.                                  |  | Poland                      
|Onufry S.A.                                |  | Poland                      
|Dako Galant Sp. z o.o.                     |  | Poland                      
|Panta Hurt Sp. z o.o.                      |  | Poland                      
|Multi-Ex S.A.                              |  | Poland
#### § 19.41 Movement of containerized cargo to a container station.

Containerized cargo may be moved from the place of unlading to a designated container station, or may be received directly at the container station from a bonded carrier after transportation in-bond, before the filing of an entry of merchandise therefor or the permitting thereof (see subpart A of part 158 of this chapter) for the purpose of breaking bulk and redelivery of the cargo. In either circumstance, excess loose cargo, as part of containerized cargo, may accompany the container to the container station.

[T.D. 82-135, 47 FR 32416, July 27, 1982]