alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GLOBAL
INDUSTRIES, LTD.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          23,131
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,729
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               163,705
<PP&E>                                         535,981
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 734,469
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,485
<BONDS>                                        209,152
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           924
<OTHER-SE>                                     396,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   734,469
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,635
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  152,770
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,636
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,379)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (483)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (896)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (896)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit12.2****Certification****I,Vinod G. Yennemadi, certify that:**     1. I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 20-F of HDFC Bank Limited;   2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;   3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;   4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of thecompany’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any changein the company’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and   5. The company’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thecompany’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:September 30, 2005    /s/ Vinod G. Yennemadi  Vinod G. Yennemadi**Group Head — Finance,****Administration, Legal and****Secretarial**
NO. 12-19-00382-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE:

DAVID ALLEN RUSSELL,

RELATOR

§

§

§

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

David Allen Russell, acting pro se, filed this original proceeding in which he asks this 

Court to direct the Anderson County District Clerk, Teresia C. Coker, to transmit and send a file 

stamped copy of his two complaints. However, this Court’s mandamus authority is limited to (1) 

a judge of a district, statutory county, statutory probate county, or county court in the court of 

appeals district; (2) a judge of a district court who is acting as a magistrate at a court of inquiry 

under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Chapter 52 in the court of appeals district; (3) an 

associate judge of a district or county court appointed by a judge under Chapter 201, Family Code, 

in the court of appeals district for the judge who appointed the associate judge; or (4) a situation 

in which a writ of mandamus is necessary to protect the Court’s jurisdiction. TEX. GOV’T CODE 

ANN. § 22.221(a), (b) (West Supp. 2018). The district clerk is not a judge, and Relator does not 

assert that a writ of mandamus directed to the district clerk is necessary to protect this Court’s 

jurisdiction. Consequently, because we do not have jurisdiction to consider the merits of Relator’s

mandamus petition, the petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See In re Eaton, No. 12–

15–00118–CR, 2016 WL 6876502, at *1 (Tex. App.–Tyler, Nov. 22, 2016, orig. proceeding)

(mem. op., not designated for publication).

Opinion delivered December 4, 2019.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

DECEMBER 4, 2019

NO. 12-19-00382-CV

DAVID ALLEN RUSSELL,

Relator

V.

TERESIA C. COKER,

Respondent

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by David 

Allen Russell; who is the relator in appellate cause number 12-19-00382-CV. Said petition for 

writ of mandamus having been filed herein on November 20, 2019, and the same having been duly 

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that it lacks jurisdiction, it is therefore 

CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and 

the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
#### § 212.26 Determination.

The presiding officer shall issue a recommended determination on the application within 90 days after completion of proceedings on the application. The determination shall include written findings and conclusions on the applicant's eligibility and status as prevailing party, and an explanation of the reasons for any difference between the amount requested and the amount awarded. The determination shall also include, if at issue, findings on whether the position of the Commission investigative attorney was substantially justified, whether the applicant unduly protracted the proceedings, or whether special circumstances make an award unjust.
Resolutions approving amend to Emp Benefit Plan



  
 EXHIBIT 10(30) 
  
 Resolutions approving amendments to the 
 AZZ incorporated Employee Benefit Plan and Trust

  
 WHEREAS, AZZ incorporated (the “Company”) established the AZZ incorporated Employee Benefit Plan and
Trust (“Original Plan”), effective March 1, 1969; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Original Plan has been amended and
restated, effective as of March 1, 2002 to comply with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade portion of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act of 1994, the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, the Small Business Job
Protection Act of 1996, the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (collectively “GUST”), the Community Renewal Tax Relief Act of 2000 (“CRA”), and certain provisions of the
Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (“EGTRRA”). 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED
that effective as provided in the amendment referred to in the preamble, the Company hereby adopts, accepts, consents to and approves the AZZ incorporated Employee Benefit Plan and Trust, as amended and restated as of March 1, 2002, substantially in
the form presented to the Board, as evidenced by the Adoption Agreement for MFS Retirement Services, Inc. Non-Standardized 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust (“Adoption Agreement”), which is used in conjunction with the MFS Retirement
Services, Inc. Prototype Paired Defined Contribution Plans for Corporations, Associations and Self-Employed Individuals; provided, however, that the proper officers of the Company are authorized, empowered and directed to accept and to execute the
Adoption Agreement, with such changes to the elections on the Adoption Agreement or such addenda or amendments to the Adoption Agreement as such officers, in their sole discretion, deem necessary or appropriate, and any such executed Adoption
Agreement, addenda or amendments are hereby approved and adopted by the Board, effective as provided in such documents, without further Board action.
Page 4 of 10





 

 

Page 10 of 10
### §934a. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–119, title I, §103(b), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1638

Section, Pub. L. 95–227, §3(a)–(c), Feb. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 12; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695; Pub. L. 96–222, title I, §108(b)(2)(A), (3)(A), Apr. 1, 1980, 94 Stat. 226, established a Black Lung Disability Trust Fund, designated trustees for the fund, and provided for operation of the fund. See section 9501 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 1982, see section 103(d)(1) of Pub. L. 97–119, set out as an Effective Date note under section 9501 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

#### Provisions Relating to Payment of Benefits to Miners and Eligible Survivors of Miners To Take Effect as Rules and Regulations of Secretary of Labor

Pub. L. 95–239, §20(b), Mar. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 106, provided that in the event that the payment of benefits to miners and to eligible survivors of miners cannot be made from the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund established by section 3(a) of the Black Lung Benefits Revenue Act of 1977 [former subsec. (a) of this section], the provisions of the Act relating to the payment of benefits to miners and to eligible survivors of miners, as in effect immediately before the date of the enactment of this Act [Mar. 1, 1978], shall take effect, as rules and regulations of the Secretary of Labor until such provisions are revoked, amended, or revised by law, and that the Secretary of Labor may promulgate additional rules and regulations to carry out such provisions and shall make benefit payments to miners and to eligible survivors of miners in accordance with such provisions.
<Page>

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent
Auditors" incorporated by reference into this Post-Effective Amendment No. 21
to the Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 33-28551) and to the
incorporation by reference therein of our report dated February 17, 2000,
with respect to the financial statements of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company
and our report dated March 29, 2000 on the financial statements of Fortis
Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account C, included in the Prospectus of
Post-Effective Amendment No. 19 to the Registration Statement (Form S-6
No. 33-28551) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Minneapolis, Minnesota                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
January 21, 2003
****Exhibit     32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the annual report of Sunburst Acquisitions IV, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending February 29, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Kelly Zastowny, aDirector of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:1)         The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
financial position and results of operations.

By: /S/ KELLY ZASTOWNY

 Kelly Zastowny, Director

Date: June 14, 2004
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 103 (Thursday, May 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30924-30925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12488]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8747]

U.S. National Commission for UNESCO Notice of Teleconference 
Meeting

    The U.S. National Commission for UNESCO will hold a conference call 
on Tuesday, June 17, 2014, from 3:00 p.m. until 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. 
The purpose of the teleconference meeting is to consider the 
recommendations of the Commission's National Committee for the 
International Hydrological Programme (IHP) and Commission's National 
Committee for the

[[Page 30925]]

Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC). The call will also be 
an opportunity to provide an update on recent and upcoming Commission 
and UNESCO activities. The Commission will accept brief oral comments 
during a portion of this conference call. The public comment period 
will be limited to approximately 10 minutes in total, with two minutes 
allowed per speaker. For more information or to arrange to participate 
in the conference call, individuals must make arrangements with the 
Executive Director of the National Commission by June 13.
    The National Commission, Washington, DC 20037 may be contacted via 
email DCUNESCO@state.gov or Telephone (202) 663-0026; Fax (202) 663-
0035. The Web site can be accessed at: http://www.state.gov/p/io/unesco/.

    Dated: May 21, 2014.
Allison Wright,
Executive Director, U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2014-12488 Filed 5-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-19-P
```
#### Donald Entwistle, an Infant, by A. Thorne Hills, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Alvin J. Faskel, et al., Appellants.

Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ. [See *post,*p. 889.]
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-13-00677-CV

Style: In the Interest of D.P.V., AKA D.P.V., Child

Date motion filed*: September 16, 2013

Type of motion: Unopposed motion for first extension of time to file appellant’s brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’s brief

Is appeal accelerated? Yes

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: September 16, 2013

Number of previous extensions granted: 0 Current Due date: September 16, 2013

Date Requested: October 16, 2013

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted in part

If document is to be filed, document due: October 7, 2013

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary 

circumstances.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp

 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: September 18, 2013
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 143 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 143

   To prohibit the importation of dangerous firearms that have been 
      modified to avoid the ban on semiautomatic assault weapons.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

  Mr. Nadler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the importation of dangerous firearms that have been 
      modified to avoid the ban on semiautomatic assault weapons.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Assault Weapon Ban Enhancement Act 
of 2003''.

SEC. 2. BAN ON IMPORTATION OF DANGEROUS FIREARMS THAT HAVE BEEN 
              MODIFIED TO AVOID THE BAN ON SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT 
              WEAPONS.

    Section 925 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(g) The Attorney General shall prohibit the importation or 
bringing into the United States of any semiautomatic assault weapon 
(including the frame or receiver of any such weapon) that is of a type 
which, as of May 1, 1998, was determined under subsection (d)(3) to be 
not generally recognized as particularly suitable for or readily 
adaptable to sporting purposes, or that includes any of the following 
characteristics:
            ``(1) The weapon has a thumb hole stock that functions as a 
        pistol grip.
            ``(2) The weapon can accept a detachable large capacity 
        ammunition magazine.
            ``(3) The weapon has a fixed magazine which can be readily 
        modified to accept a large capacity ammunition magazine.
            ``(4) The weapon uses .22 caliber ammunition.''.
                                 <all>
```
Rel: September 13, 2024

STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

THE SUPREME COURT SPECIAL TERM, 2024

SC-2023-0917 Rong Hao Li, Yan Chen, Zi Mo Zu, Liqing Li, and Mizu Japanese, Inc. v. Qui R. Chen (Appeal from Shelby Circuit Court: CV-18-901183). STEWART, Justice. AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R. App. P. Parker, C.J., and Wise, Sellers, and Cook, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Marie H. Kelly et al., Appellants, against Harris H. Murdock, Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, Respondents.

No opinion. Present —Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ.
§ 210.36 General provisions for hearings. ( a ) *Purpose of hearings.* ( 1 ) An opportunity for a hearing shall be provided in each investigation under this part, in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act. At the hearing, the presiding administrative law judge will take evidence and hear argument for the purpose of determining whether there is a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, and for the purpose of making findings and recommendations, as described in § 210.42(a)(1)(ii), concerning the appropriate remedy and the amount of the bond to be posted by respondents during Presidential review of the Commission's action, under section 337(j) of the Tariff Act.
( 2 ) An opportunity for a hearing in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act shall also be provided in connection with every motion for temporary relief filed under this part.
( b ) *Public hearings.* All hearings in investigations under this part shall be public unless otherwise ordered by the administrative law judge.
( c ) *Expedition.* Hearings shall proceed with all reasonable expedition, and, insofar as practicable, shall be held at one place, continuing until completed unless otherwise ordered by the administrative law judge.
( d ) *Rights of the parties.* Every hearing under this section shall be conducted in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (i.e., 5 U.S.C. §§ 554 through 556). Hence, every party shall have the right of adequate notice, cross-examination, presentation of evidence, objection, motion, argument, and all other rights essential to a fair hearing.
( e ) *Presiding official.* An administrative law judge shall preside over each hearing unless the Commission shall otherwise order.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-028 March 14. 2001

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS’

SUBCOMMITTEE ON REACTOR FUELS TO MEET IN MARYLAND ON APRIL 4

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has

scheduled a meeting of its subcommittee on reactor fuels on April 4 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two

White Flint North building, at 11545 Rockville Pike, beginning at 8:30 a.m.

The subcommittee will discuss safety issues associated with the use of mixed oxide fuel and

high burn-up fuel in nuclear power plants.

Those who wish to make oral or written statements, or seek additional information on the

meeting or changes to the agenda, should contact Medhat El-Zeftawy at 301-415-6889.

ACRS meeting notices, transcripts and letters are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW/ .

###
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****John D. Rockefeller, III**
 
Part: 01 | 02 | 03
 
SuDoc:J 1.14/2:R 59
Item Number:0721 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000619457
 
November 2, 2017
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies
that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ WILLIAM V. CAREYWilliam V. CareyChairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerJune 29, 2009