alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23675]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Business Board; Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Business Board (DBB) will meet in open session on 
Wednesday, November 17, 2004, at the Pentagon, Washington, DC from 1000 
until 1145. The mission of the DBB is to advise the Senior Executive 
Council (SEC) and the Secretary of Defense on effective strategies for 
implementation of best business practices of interest to the Department 
of Defense. At this meeting, the Board's Acquisition, Human Resources, 
and Financial Management related task groups will deliberate on their 
preliminary findings and recommendations related to tasks assigned 
earlier this year.

DATES: Wednesday, November 17, 2004, 1000 to 1145 hrs.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Members of the public who wish to 
attend the meeting must contact the Defense Business Board no later 
than Wednesday, November 10th for further information about admission 
as seating is limited. Additionally, those who wish to make oral 
comments or deliver written comments should also request to be 
scheduled, and submit a written text of the comments by Wednesday, 
November 10th to allow time for distribution to the Board members prior 
to the meeting. Individual oral comments will be limited to five 
minutes, with the total oral comment period not exceeding thirty 
minutes.
    The DBB may be contacted at: Defense Business Board, 1100 Defense 
Pentagon, room 2E314, Washington, DC 20301-1100, via e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#32767070725d41561c42575c4653555d5c1c5f5b5e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="60242222200f13044e10050e1401070f0e4e0d090c">[email protected]</span></a>, or via phone at (703) 614-8586.

Jeannette Owings-Ballard,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-23675 Filed 10-21-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
PaciFic: Alaska FreightiiVays 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Reference: No. FAA-2014-0107 

To Whom It May Concern: 

5/20/2014 

We are writing in support of the Petition for Exemption, Docket Number FAA-2014-0107, wherein the 

Petitioner, Everts Air, seeks relief from certain requirements of inter alia §121.436 of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations. The recently enacted regulation requires co-pilots (second in command) hired or 

promoted to that position after 31 July 2013 to be certified as captains (pilot in command) with respect 

to the aircraft type rating. This regulation will also require all pilots serving as second in command to be 

certified in this manner after 01 January 2016. 

The petitioner, Tatonduk Outfitters, Ltd., d/b/a Everts Air provides essential services in a unique 

environment. There are no simulator training devices for several of the aircraft they operate, including 

the DC-6 and C-46. Thus, all training must be conducted in the airplanes, in flight. It is noteworthy that 

Everts Air does not seek relief from the requirement that all pilots must possess airline transport 

licenses. 

This mandate will not result in an increased level of safety, rather a lower standard of safety as the more 

critical and technically demanding captain's maneuvers will now be required ofthe second in command 

candidate. Historically, training in aircraft rather than simulators has proven dangerous, particularly in 
training lesser experienced pilots in emergency and abnormal procedures and maneuvers. This element 

represents an increased risk. 

When this rule was promulgated by Congress, there was an assumption made that all airline training 

was accomplished in a simulator. The simulator represents a safe and relatively low cost training 

environment. The cost of training a pilot in a flight simulator is on the order of $14,000.00. The cost of 

training the same pilot for the type rating course in the airplane is nearly ten times that, and represents 

a cost that Everts Air will have to pass along to us as the customer. 

We are deeply concerned that this cost will drive the petitioner to withdraw from several markets, 

leaving non-certificated and/or fewer safe operators. Their alternative is to increase the cost, making 

arctic operations impractical for industry, including aviation, thus increasing the cost of living in rural 

communities. 

The §121 air carrier has proven to be the safest supply chain for business, industry and residential needs 

in outlying areas. We agree with the petitioner's position that training to the level that was in place 

before the enactment of 14 CFR 121.436 represents continued service at the highest standard of safety. 

In the interest of air safety and viable logistics options for rural communities, we are in favor of 

supporting the Petition for Exemption, Docket Number FAA-2014-0107.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 64825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27183]



[[Page 64825]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2891-017]


City of Tallahassee; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Energy Projects has reviewed an application submitted by the City of 
Tallahassee (licensee) to surrender the project license for the Jackson 
Bluff Hydroelectric Project No. 2891. The project is located on the 
Ochlockonee River in Leon, Liberty, and Gadsden counties, Florida. The 
project does not occupy federal lands.
    An environmental assessment (EA) has been prepared as part of 
staff's review of the proposal. In the application the licensee 
proposes to decommission the power generating capability both 
electrically and hydraulically. No modifications to the existing dam or 
project-related buildings are proposed. All decommissioning work would 
occur at the powerhouse. The EA contains Commission staff's analysis of 
the probable environmental impacts of the proposed action and concludes 
that approval of the proposal would not constitute a major federal 
action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
    The EA is available for review and reproduction at the Commission's 
Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE, Room 2A, 
Washington, DC 20426. The EA may also be viewed on the Commission's 
website at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``elibrary'' link. Enter the 
docket number (P-2891) in the docket number field to access the 
document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f494a5d4c40616366616a5c7a7f7f607d7b4f696a7d6c21686079"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="35737067767a5b595c5b50664045455a474175535047561b525a43">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free at 1-866-208-3372, or for TTY, 
(202) 502-8659.

    Dated: December 10, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-27183 Filed 12-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

Fact Sheet 2006–3116

 September 2006 (revised October 2012)

Negotiation Training Courses

for Natural Resource Professionals

Negotiation Skills for Natural Resource 

Professionals: Building a Foundation

Dates: 

 

$SULO0D\

$SULO

Cost: 	 $750

At this course, participants will

1.	 Become well-versed in different types of negotiations,

negotiation styles, and strategies

2.	 Understand how to best communicate interests and objectives

3.	 Learn to successfully analyze and assess the knowledge and

interests of the other parties

After this course, participants will be prepared to

1.	 Employ the communication skills that are essential to a

successful negotiation

2.	 Understand and apply different strategies and tactics

3.	 Reframe an issue and aim toward moving a discussion

toward resolution

Strategies and Tactics for the Experienced 

Natural Resource Negotiator

Dates: 

1RYHPEHU

 2014

November 18-20

 2015

November 17-19

Cost: $850

At this course, participants will 

1.	 Diagnose natural resource negotiations

2.	 Plan multi-party, long-term negotiations

3.	 Select, assemble, and lead an effective

	 negotiation team

4.	 Obtain and apply technical information in a

negotiation process

After this course, participants will be prepared to 

1.	 Successfully lead a negotiating team

2.	 Apply negotiation strategies to a variety of

management situations

3.	 Coach others in the negotiation process

Contact Information:

fort_negotiation_training

@usgs.gov

or

Earlene Swann

Training Coordinator

swanne@usgs.gov

970-226-9346

Katie Walters

Registration Information

waltersk@usgs.gov

970-226-9334

Visit our webpage:

http://www.fort.usgs.gov/Products/Training/

Offered by the U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center,

Policy Analysis and Science Assistance Branch

Where: Fort Collins Science Center (FORT), Fort Collins, Colorado

FORT’s Policy Analysis and Science Assistance Branch (PASA) has been conducting and publishing

research on multi-party natural resource negotiation since the 1980s. This research has led to the

development of basic and advanced negotiation training courses.

Both courses are a mix of lecture, hands-on training, and discussion. Please join us and other natural resource professionals facing

similar problems and share your experiences. Come prepared to candidly discuss examples of successes to embrace, stalemates to

recognize, and pitfalls to avoid in natural resource negotiations.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1383

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax relief for 

the conversion of cooperative housing corporations into condominiums. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2003

Mr. ABERCROMBIE (for himself and Mr. CASE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

tax relief for the conversion of cooperative housing corporations into condominiums.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NONRECOGNITION OF GAIN OR LOSS ON DIS4 TRIBUTIONS BY COOPERATIVE HOUSING 

5 CORPORATIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 216(e) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to distributions by cooper8 ative housing corporations) is amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(e) DISTRIBUTIONS BY COOPERATIVE HOUSING

10 CORPORATIONS.—
2

•HR 1383 IH 

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in regu2 lations—

3 ‘‘(A) no gain or loss shall be recognized to 

4 a cooperative housing corporation on the dis5 tribution by such corporation of a dwelling unit 

6 to a stockholder in such corporation if such dis7 tribution is in exchange for the stockholder’s 

8 stock in such corporation, and 

9 ‘‘(B) no gain or loss shall be recognized to 

10 a stockholder of such corporation on the trans11 fer of such stockholder’s stock in an exchange 

12 described in subparagraph (A). 

13 ‘‘(2) BASIS.—The basis of a dwelling unit ac14 quired in a distribution to which paragraph (1) ap15 plies shall be the same as the basis of the stock in 

16 the cooperative housing corporation for which it is 

17 exchanged, decreased in the amount of any money 

18 received by the taxpayer in such exchange.’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

20 this section shall apply to distributions after the date of 

21 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-018 February 5, 2003

NRC APPROVES POWER UPRATE FOR RIVER BEND STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a request by Entergy Operations to increase

the generating capacity of the River Bend nuclear power plant by 1.7 percent.

The power uprate at the plant, located in St. Francisville, Louisiana, increases the generating

capacity of the plant from 1043 to 1060 megawatts electric. The licensee intends to implement the

uprate by the end of April.

NRC previously published a notice about the power uprate application in the Federal Register

providing the public an opportunity to comment or request a hearing. No comments or hearing requests

were received by the NRC.

 The NRC’s safety evaluation of the requested power uprate for the plant focused on several

areas, including nuclear steam supply systems, instrumentation and control systems, electrical systems,

accident evaluations, radiological consequences, operations, and other technical specification changes. 

The NRC staff determined that the licensee could safely increase the power output of the reactor

primarily through increased feedwater flow measurement accuracy.

###
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-137 September 13, 2000

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, ON SEPTEMBER 21

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has

scheduled a meeting of its subcommittee on materials and metallurgy on September 21 in Rockville,

Maryland.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s

Two White Flint North building, at 11545 Rockville Pike, starting at 8:30 a.m.

Among other items, the subcommittee will discuss the status of a technical re-evaluation

project on reactor vessel pressurized thermal shock, including the development of flaw and fracture

toughness distributions.

Those who wish to make oral or written statements, or seek additional information on the

meeting or changes to the agenda, should contact Noel Dudley, at 301-415-6888.

Other aspects of the meeting are described in the September 5 edition of the Federal Register.

ACRS meeting notices and letter reports are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW/ .

###
459 P.2d 461

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom CONNERS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 335.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

Sept. 26, 1969.

*663James A. Maloney, Atty. Gen., Ray Shollenbarger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellant.

William M. Siegenthaler, Artesia, for ■defendant-appellee.

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

Defendant was charged with issuing two worthless checks totaling in excess of $25.00. The trial court held that the punishment provided by § 40-49-5 (B), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 6, Supp.1969) was unconstitutionally vague and quashed the information. The State appeals.

State v. Ferris, (N.M.Ct.App.) 159 P.2d 462, decided September 19, 1969, held that the words, “total amount of the checks,” appearing in § 40-49-5, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 6, Supp.1969) were unconstitutionally vague. It also held that the offense of issuing worthless checks was charged without reference to penalty provisions, that the unconstitutional “totaling” provision could he severed and a person could be punished under the remaining provisions of § 40-49-5, supra.

State v. Ferris, supra, is applicable. The trial court correctly held that defendant could not be punished under § 40-49-5(B), supra, by “totaling” the two checks. However, the trial court erred in quashing the information. Defendant can be punished under the remaining provi■sions of § 40-49-5, supra, for each worthless check that he has issued.

The order quashing the information is reversed. The cause is remanded with directions to reinstate the information and ■proceed consistently with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

OMAN and HENDLEY, JJ„ concur.
#### § 147.15 Tentative appraisement.

All articles entered for a fair shall be tentatively appraised prior to exhibition or use.
#### § 171.61 Time and place of filing.

If the petitioner is not satisfied with a decision of the deciding official on an original petition for relief, a supplemental petition may be filed with the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer having jurisdiction in the port where the violation occurred. Such supplemental petition must be filed within 60 days from the date of notice to the petitioner of the decision from which further relief is requested or within 60 days following an administrative or judicial decision with respect to the entries involved in a penalty case which reduces the loss of duties upon which the mitigated penalty amount was based (whichever is later) unless another time to file such a supplemental petition is prescribed in the decision. The filing of a supplemental petition may be subject to the conditions prescribed in § 171.64 of this part. A supplemental petition may be filed whether or not the mitigated penalty or forfeiture remission amount designated in the decision on the original petition is paid.
Exhibit 31.1

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

A LOUISIANA CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, James C. Eckert, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of OMNI Energy Services Corp., a Louisiana corporation (the registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/    JAMES C. ECKERT 
|James C. Eckert        
|Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     Notice published October 6, 2004 (69 FR 59928) the reference to Waterline Pakistan (PVT) Ltd. is corrected to read: “Waterlink Pakistan (PVT) Ltd.”                

Dated: October 15, 2004.

Bryant L. VanBrakle,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 04-23473 Filed 10-19-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P