alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6438** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. TRUMAN SCOTT , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington
. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 7:98

- cr - 00079

- BO

- 1 )

Submitted : July 25 , 2013 Decided: July 29, 2013

Before GREGORY , DAVIS , and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Truman Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Michael Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Truman Scott appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his motion for disclosure of grand jury transcripts. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court
. United States v. Scott , No. 7:98

- cr - 00079

- BO

- 1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 26, 2013) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional proces s.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Eloise King, Respondent, against Eleanor M. Mitchell, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ.
#### Roberts v. Roberts.

Sept. 25, 1945.

Fred K. Cope for appellant.

C. W. Napier for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Cammack

Reversing.

Johnnie Roberts, a member of the armed forces, instituted this action for a divorce from Virginia Mae Roberts, and to obtain custody of their three year old daughter. Both parties were residents of Perry County, Kentucky. The chancellor properly granted Roberts a divorce, but refused to pass upon the question of the custody of the child, because Mrs. Roberts had gone to Ohio after the issues had been joined, proof had been taken and the cause submitted for final determination by agreement of the parties. Presumably, Mrs. Roberts took her daughter with her, as she could not be located in Perry County.

The chancellor’s ruling on the question of the custody of the child was based upon the recent case of Callahan v. Callahan, 296 Ky. 444, 177 S. W. 2d 565. In that case the husband resided in Indiana and the wife and child resided in Kentucky. The husband proceeded against his wife by constructive service, and was awarded a divorce and granted the custody of the child. We held that the *455part of the Indiana judgment relating to the custody of the child was not binding in this state, because at the time of its rendition the child was residing with its mother in Kentucky, and therefore was not within the jurisdiction of the Indiana court.

Mrs. Roberts employed counsel who filed pleadings for her, cross-examined the husband’s witnesses and joined in the motion for a final determination of the cause. As a matter of fact, Mrs. Roberts and her daughter Were present when the husband’s depositions were being taken. As pointed out in 14 Am. Jur., Courts, section 195, when jurisdiction once attaches, it is not lost by the removal of the defendant from the jurisdiction. Mrs. Roberts and the child were within the jurisdiction of the Perry Circuit Court, and, as we have noted, she actually participated in the cause. It is our view that once jurisdiction attached, as it clearly did in this instance, the Perry Circuit Court had the power to determine finally all the issues involved in the cause. To hold otherwise would make it virtually impossible to arrive at a final determination of the custody of a child in a divorce proceeding, because all that the party who had the custody of the child would have to do would be to remove the child from the jurisdiction of the court before judgment was entered, even though the issues had been joined, proof taken and the cause submitted.

Wherefore, the part of the judgment relating to the custody of the child is reversed, with directions that it be set aside, and for the chancellor to proceed to pass upon that question.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1438 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1438

   To authorize a State to temporarily extend a waiver granted with 
    respect to the State program of aid to families with dependent 
                               children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2003

    Mr. Wu introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize a State to temporarily extend a waiver granted with 
    respect to the State program of aid to families with dependent 
                               children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STATE OPTION TO TEMPORARILY EXTEND WAIVER GRANTED WITH 
              RESPECT TO THE STATE PROGRAM OF AID TO FAMILIES WITH 
              DEPENDENT CHILDREN.

    Section 415 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 615) is amended 
by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) State Option to Temporarily Extend Waiver In Effect on Date 
of Enactment of Welfare Reform.--A State that is operating under a 
waiver described in subsection (a)(1)(A) which would otherwise expire 
in the period that begins on January 1, 2002, and ends on September 30, 
2008, may elect to continue to operate under the waiver, on the same 
terms and conditions as applied to the waiver on the day before the 
date the waiver would otherwise expire, through the earlier of such 
date as the State may select or September 30, 2008.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9    
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             510
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,013
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        200
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,341
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,341
<LOANS>                                         57,122
<ALLOWANCE>                                        354
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,400
<DEPOSITS>                                      36,663
<SHORT-TERM>                                       262
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  68,400
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,311
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  181
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   405
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,897
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,248
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,329
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,568
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       63
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,047
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,488
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       905
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.08
<LOANS-NON>                                        321
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    179
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   303
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       13
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  354
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               290
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             63
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John  Atherly,  the  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  eMagin  Corporation  (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  (15  U.S.C.  78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to eMagin  Corporation  and will be retained by eMagin  Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Dated: November 2, 2005

/s/ John Atherly
----------------
Name: John Atherly
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Continuing Abatement Order filed November 14, 2019 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00009-CR

NO. 14-18-00010-CR

NO. 14-18-00021-CR

____________

STEVEN KURT BAUGHMAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1423421

CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

On July 25, 2019, this court directed the trial court to conduct a hearing in 

this case to determine whether appellant needed appointment of new counsel. Our 

order required the trial judge to see that a record of the hearing is made, make 

findings of fact and conclusions of law, and order the trial clerk to forward a record 

of the hearing and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and 
conclusions. The transcribed record of the hearing and the courts findings and 

conclusions were to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before August 29, 

2019. To date, the court has received a record of the hearing, but has not received a

supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings or an order 

appointing new counsel. 

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 

supplemental clerk’s record is filed in this court. 

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Spain.
**UNITED STATES ACCESS BOARD**

A FEDERAL AGENCY COM MI TTED TO ACCESSIBLE DESIGN **MEMORANDUM To:**  Docket No. ATBCB
- 2013 - 0003 **From:** Gretchen Jacobs General Counsel **Date:** September 23, 2014 **Re:** Ex Parte Meeting On September 23, 2014, representatives from the Cruise Lines Industry of America (CLIA), as well as several individual cruise lines, met with Access Board staff in Arlington, Virginia to discuss comments and a dataset submitted by CLIA to regulations.gov entitled “Analysis of th e Supply of Wheelchair Accessible Cabins and the Impact of Requiring Additional Accessible Cabins on New Vessels” by Business Research and Economic Advisors ( hereafter, BREA Study), and to allow Board staff to review unreda ct e d data described in that study . 1 Access Board staff attending this meeting were : David Capozzi; Gretchen Jacobs; Marsha Mazz; Paul Beatty; and Aromie Noe. Representatives from CLIA, BREA, and individual cruise lines were: Ted Thompson (CLIA); Andrew Moody (BREA); Ron Petit (Royal Car ibbean, et al.); Jay Cardinali ( Walt Disney Company); Tiffany Bergman (Holland America Line); Carolyn Doppelt Gray (Carnival Cruise Lines).

1 The Brea Study is available at: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=ATBCB - 2013 - 0003 - 0066 . In April 2014, CLIA provided the Access Board with a redacted versi on of the dataset underlying the Brea Study . See Docket # ATBCB - 2013 -0003 - 0070.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. III-02-014 April 2, 2002

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH EXELON GENERATION CO. APRIL 10 TO DISCUSS 

BRAIDWOOD NUCLEAR POWER STATION SAFETY PERFORMANCE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Exelon Generation

Co. in Wilmington, Illinois, on Tuesday, April 9, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual

assessment of safety performance at the Braidwood Nuclear Power Station. The two-reactor facility is

located near Braidwood, Illinois.

The meeting, which will be the open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 1

p.m. in the Exelon Services and Training Center, 36400 South Essex Road, Wilmington. Before the

meeting is concluded, NRC officials will answer questions from members of the public.

The performance period to be discussed is April 1 through December 31 of last year.

A letter sent from the NRC Region III office to Exelon addresses plant performance during the

period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/brai_2001q4.pdf

Current performance information for the Braidwood facility is available on the NRC web site

at: (Unit 1) http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/BRAI1/brai1_chart.html and (Unit 2)

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/BRAI2/brai2_chart.html

###
PUBLIC LAW 110–249—JUNE 26, 2008 122 STAT. 2317 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3913: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110–518 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure). 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 110–343 (Comm. on Foreign Relations). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Jan. 28, considered and passed House. 

June 5, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–249 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the International Center Act to authorize the lease or sublease of certain 

property described in such Act to an entity other than a foreign government 

or international organization if certain conditions are met. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE INTERNATIONAL CENTER ACT. 

The first section of the International Center Act (Public Law 

90–553; 82 Stat. 958) is amended by adding at the end the following 

new sentence: ‘‘Notwithstanding the foregoing limitations, the property identified by the District of Columbia as tax lots 803, 804, 

805, and 806 within the area described in this section may be 

leased or subleased to an entity other than a foreign government 

or international organization, so long as the Secretary maintains 

the right to approve the occupant and the intended use of the 

property.’’. 

Approved June 26, 2008. 

June 26, 2008 

[H.R. 3913] 


dkrause on GSDDPC44 with PUBLIC LAWS
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 526 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to harmonize the definition 

of employee with the common law. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2 (legislative day, MARCH 1), 2021 

Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BRAUN, 

and Mr. CRAMER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to 

harmonize the definition of employee with the common law. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Modern Worker Em5 powerment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS 

7 ACT OF 1938 TO HARMONIZE THE DEFINITION 

8 OF EMPLOYEE. 

9 (a) DEFINITION OF EMPLOYEE.—Section 3(e)(1) of 

10 the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 526 IS

1 203(e)(1)) is amended by inserting before the period the 

2 following: ‘‘, as determined under the usual common law 

3 rules’’. 

4 (b) DEFINITION OF EMPLOY.—Section 3(g) of the 

5 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 203(g)) is 

6 amended by inserting ‘‘an employee’’ after ‘‘permit’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0190 - Status Report on Power Uprates

Accession Number: ML032681191

Date Released: Tuesday, November 18, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML032660398 - SECY-03-0190 - Status Report on Power Uprates. (14 page(s), 11/3/2003)
    - ML032681193 - SECY-03-0190 - Attachment 4 - Summary of Public Comments on Draft Review Standard (RS)-001, "Draft Review Standard for Extended Power Uprates" (6 page(s), 11/3/2003)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 19.9 General order, abandoned, and seized merchandise. ( a ) *Acceptance of merchandise.* The arriving carrier (or other party to whom custody of the merchandise was transferred by the carrier under a Customs-authorized permit to transfer or in-bond entry) is responsible for preparing a Customs Form (CF) 6043 (Delivery Ticket), or other similar Customs document as designated by the port director or an electronic equivalent as authorized by Customs, to cover the proprietor's receipt of the merchandise and its transport to the warehouse from the custody of the arriving carrier (or other party to whom custody of the merchandise was transferred by the carrier under a Customs-authorized permit to transfer or in-bond entry). A joint determination will be made by the warehouse proprietor and the bonded carrier of the quantity and condition of the goods or articles so delivered to the warehouse. Within two working days of the joint determination, the warehouse proprietor will report to the port director any discrepancy between the quantity and condition of the goods and that reported on CF 6043, or other similar Customs document as designated by the port director or an electronic equivalent as authorized by Customs.
( b ) *Recording and storing.* General order, abandoned, and seized goods and articles shall be recorded and stored in the warehouse as prescribed by § 19.12.
( c ) *Release of merchandise.* Merchandise in general order may be released by the warehouse proprietor, after Customs inspection or examination as ordered by the port director, to the person named in a release order under § 141.11 of this chapter. The release may only be made by the proprietor upon presentation of a permit to release or delivery authorization signed by the appropriate Customs officer on Customs Form 3461, or its electronic equivalent, 7501, or its electronic equivalent, 368 or 368A or other Customs form as designated by the port director. General order goods which have been unclaimed under § 127.11 of this chapter, voluntarily abandoned, or seized and forfeited may be released for transfer to the place of sale upon presentation to the warehouse proprietor of an approved copy of Customs Form 5251 (Order to Transfer Merchandise for Public Auction (Sale)), and an approved copy of Customs Form 6043 (Delivery Ticket). The quantity and condition of the goods so transferred shall be determined jointly by the proprietor and the cartman or lighterman picking up the goods for delivery to the place of sale. Any discrepancies shall be noted on the delivery ticket, a copy of which shall be sent to the port director within two business days of agreement. Seized goods that are released for a purpose other than sale may be released from warehouse only upon such written terms and conditions as directed by the port director.
[T.D. 82-204, 47 FR 49371, Nov. 1, 1982, as amended by T.D. 92-56, 57 FR 24944, June 12, 1992; T.D. 02-65, 67 FR 68032, Nov. 8, 2002; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61286, Oct. 13, 2015]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of LJ International Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hon
Tak Ringo Ng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                             /s/ HON TAK RINGO NG
                                             ----------------------------
                                             Hon Tak Ringo Ng
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             August 22, 2002
### §938. Determinations and points of order

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as limiting the authority of the chairmen of the Committees on the Budget of the House and Senate under section 643 of this title. CBO may consult with the Chairmen of the House and Senate Budget Committees to resolve any ambiguities in this chapter.

(Pub. L. 111–139, title I, §12, Feb. 12, 2010, 124 Stat. 29.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title I of Pub. L. 111–139, Feb. 12, 2010, 124 Stat. 8, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title I to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 931 of this title and Tables.
#### In the Matter of Manqueen Corporation, Judgment Creditor, Appellant, v. Reclamation and Building Corporation, Judgment Debtor, Respondent. Sarah B. McCrary et al., as Executors of Arthur Brisbane, Deceased, Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.