alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-232

October 29, 1999

NRC MAKES DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC

ON ITS WEBSITE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun making documents available to the

public through an “electronic reading room” on the agency’s website, which is accessible by

computers in homes, schools, offices, and libraries, using a standard web browser.

The new initiative is a change in the current practice of making records available only in

paper or microfiche copies at the NRC’s Public Document Room in Washington, D.C.

The system, entitled the “Agencywide Documents Access and Management System

(ADAMS),” can be accessed at http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/index.html.

The site is “user-friendly,” and contains easily understandable instructions for searching,

viewing and downloading documents.

Beginning November 1, the agency will place all newly received and created public

records in the Electronic Reading Room on the website. The Public Document Room in

Washington, D.C. will remain open, however, and will continue to provide access for the public

to its pre-ADAMS paper and microfiche documents, as well as on-site computers for access to

newer documents. During a transition period scheduled to end on November 30, paper and

microfiche copies will also continue to be made available in the Public Document Room. The

Public Document Room staff will also provide assistance to those using ADAMS.

Interested persons may obtain paper copies of both new and older documents for a fee

from the Public Document Room by mail, electronic mail, fax, toll-free telephone, or by

downloading them directly from the ADAMS website. Bibliographic descriptions of older

documents will also be searchable on the website.

The ADAMS system will have a number of advantages over the former document

retrieval system:

ˇ Post-ADAMS records are now available electronically in full text and image, which was

not normally the case before;

ˇ ADAMS provides full-text search capability and will make it easier to identify records that

meet users’ search criteria;
ˇ Newly received and generated records will now be available to the public within days

instead of weeks;

ˇ Through the internet, many more members of the public will have ready access to NRC

documents.

The agency sought public comment on a proposed amendment to its regulations which

reflect the change to the ADAMS system and the final rule was published in the Federal

Register on September 9.

The Public Document Room is located at 2120 L Street, NW, telephone 800-397-4209.

###
#### Donald Flamm, Appellant, v. Edward J. Noble, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Townley, Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
**NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP**

Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 provides that in case any part of a registration statement, when such part became effective, contained an untrue statement of a material fact, oromitted to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant to such registration statement(unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person knew of such untruth or omission) may sue, among others, an accountant who has with his consent been named as having certifiedany part of the registration statement, or as having prepared any report which is used in connection with the registration statement. On May 30, 2002 the Company dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP("Arthur Andersen") as its independent auditors. Arthur Andersen has not consented to the incorporation by reference of its audit report with respect to the Company's financial statements as of andfor the years ended December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000 into previously filed registration statements (File Nos. 333-40773, 333-81467 and 333-103136). A copy of Arthur Andersen's audit report isincluded in this Form 10-K. Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act of 1933 permits the Company to file this Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference into the above-listedregistration statements, without a written consent from Arthur Andersen. As a result, Arthur Andersen will not have any liability under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any untrue statementsof material fact contained in the financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen or any omissions of a material fact required to be stated therein. Accordingly, an investor would be unable to asserta claim against Arthur Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS965 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
#### Jorge CHANSOULME, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank ELO, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-2386.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 23, 2002.

Before SUHRHEINRICH and GILMAN, Circuit Judges; and HOOD *, District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Joseph M. Hood, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Jorge Chansoulme appeals from the order of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner makes three arguments on appeal. First, he asserts that the writ should issue because his plea was induced by incorrect advice. Second, he argues that because of this bad advice, his plea was not knowingly and intelligently made. Third, he claims that *229-233he should have been granted an evidentiary hearing in the district court.

Having reviewed the record, the briefs, and the applicable law, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we conclude that the district court properly denied Petitioner’s petition, for all the reasons stated in the district court opinion dated October 13, 2000.

Accordingly, we HEREBY AFFIRM the judgment of the district court denying Petitioner’s request for the grant of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, for the reasons stated in the district court opinion dated October 13, 2000.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23590]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 4875]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Bacchus''

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999 (64 FR 56014), Delegation of 
Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999 (64 FR 57920), as amended, and 
Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 (68 FR 19875), I 
hereby determine that the object to be included in the exhibition, 
``Bacchus,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign lender. I also determine 
that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the 
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about 
October 28, 2004, to on or about January 24, 2005, and at possible 
additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. 
Public notice of these determinations is ordered to be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, contact Paul 
W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, (202) 619-
5997, and the address is United States Department of State, SA-44, Room 
700, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: October 13, 2004.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 04-23590 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
## 45FR82988

82988 Federal Register / Vol. 45, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 17, 1980 / Notices

Office of Conservation and Solar Energy

Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products ; Petition for Waiver of Consumer Product Test Procedures From Hydro Therm, Inc. (Case No. F-002)

AGENCY : Department of Energy.

SUMMARY : The energy conservation program for consumer products, other than automobiles, was established pursuant to the Energy Policy Conservation Act. The Department of Energy (DOE) has amended the Department's regulations for the energy conservation program for consumer products by allowing the Assistant Secretary for Conservation and Solar Energy temporarily to waive test procedure requirements for a particular covered product (45 FR 64108, Sept. 26, 1980). Waivers may be granted when characteristics of the product prevent use of the prescribed test procedures or lead to results that provide materially inaccurate comparative data. Pursuant to paragraph (b) of § 430.27 of the Code of Federal Regulations, DOE is required to publish in the Federal Register all received Petitions for Waiver and supporting documents from which
confidential information has been
deleted in accordance with 10 CFR 1004.11. Also, DOE is required to solicit comments, data and information with respect to the determination of the petition.
DATES : DOE will accept comments, data, and information no later than January 16,1981.
ADDRESSES : Written comments and statements shall be sent to., Department of Energy, Office of Conservation and Solar Energy, Case No. D-002, Mail Stop GH-068, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James A. Smith, U.S. Department of Energy Office of Conservation and Solar Energy, Room CH-065, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585, (202) 252- 9127. Eugene Margolis, Esq., U.S. Department of Energy, Office of General Counsel, Room 88-128, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.G. 20585, (202) 252-
9528. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background On November 21, 1980, Hydro Therm, Inc., filed a Petition for Waiver from the DOE test procedures for consumer products. Specifically, the petitioner believes that the use of the existing furnace test procedure will lead to results that provide materially inaccurate comparative data when these test procedures are applied to a particular design of furnace manufactured by Hydro Therm, Inc. In consideration of the foregoing and in accordance with the provisions of § 430.27(b) of Chapter II of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, DOE is hereby publishing the "Petition for Waiver" in
the Federal Register in its entirety. The petition contains no confidential information. DOE is hereby soliciting comments, data and information

respecting the determination of the petition.
Issued in Washington, D.C., December ii, 1950. Frank DeGeorge, Principal DeputyAssistant Secretary, Conservation and Solar Energy.

(FR Dvc

. 80-59221 Filed IZ-1a-5 Eris emJ

BILGNG 000E 9450-01-N
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-97-77 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Thursday, November 13, 1997)

NRC OFFICIALS TO MEET WITH FPC ON NOVEMBER 20

TO DISCUSS STATUS OF CRYSTAL RIVER RESTART

Meeting At NRC Headquarters Is Open To Public Observation

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will meet with Florida Power Corporation management

at NRC Headquarters in Washington, D. C. on Thursday, November 20, to review the status of

company plans for restart of the Crystal River nuclear power plant later this year.

The meeting will be held at 1:00 p.m. at the NRC headquarters complex, located at One White

Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, in Rockville, Maryland, a Washington suburb. Attendees using the

Washington Metro system should board the Yellow Line at National Airport and switch to the Red Line

destined for Shady Grove at Gallery Place. From downtown Washington, board a Red Line train

bound for Shady Grove. Depart the Red Line at the White Flint station and proceed to the NRC

buildings located across from the subway entrance.

The company temporarily shut down the Crystal River nuclear plant in September of 1996 to

resolve concerns related to regulatory safety and design and has been working to ready the facility

for a restart projected for late this year.

The meeting is between officials of the NRC and FPC but is open to the public for purposes of

observation. NRC officials will be available at the meeting’s conclusion to answer questions from

reporters or other interested observers.

#
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent of Independent Accountants

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-44098, 333-84581, 333-75599, 333-46325, 333-88060 and 333-99439) of Getty Images, Inc. of our reports dated February 3, 2003 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statementschedule, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

 

 

/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSE COOPERS LLP 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

March 21, 2003
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 03-153 November 20, 2003

NRC ANNOUNCES OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING ON APPLICATION

TO RENEW ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT 2, OPERATING LICENSE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has announced the opportunity to request a

hearing on an application from Entergy Nuclear Operations to renew the operating license for Unit 2 of

the Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO) plant for an additional 20 years beyond the period specified in the

current license. ANO is located near Russellville, Arkansas, and the current operating license for Unit

2 expires on July 17, 2018.

The deadline for requesting participation in the hearing is 30 days from the date of publication

of a Federal Register Notice, expected shortly. By that date, petitions must be filed by anyone whose

interest might be affected by the license renewal, and who wishes to participate as a party in the

proceeding. Petitions for a hearing must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications

Staff. They may also be delivered to the NRC Public Document Room at 11555 Rockville Pike,

Rockville, Maryland.

Copies of the petition should also be sent to:

-- Office of General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-

0001, and by fax (301-415-3725) or e-mail (OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov );

-- Secretary of the Commission by fax (301-415-1101) or e-mail (hearingdocket@nrc.gov ),

and;

-- Craig G. Anderson, Vice President, Operations ANO, Entergy Operations, Inc., 1448 S.R.

333, Russellville, AR 72801.

Additional information about the opportunity for a hearing may be found in the Federal

Register Notice. A copy of the license renewal application is available on the NRC web site at this

address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/ano-2.html . The document is

also available for inspection at the NRC’s Public Document Room in Rockville, Maryland, and at the

Arkansas Technical University’s library, 305 West Q St., Russellville, Arkansas.
- 2 -

NRC staff have determined Entergy has submitted sufficient information for the agency to

formally “docket,” or file, the application. Docketing the application does not preclude requesting

additional information as the review proceeds, nor does it indicate whether the Commission will grant

or deny the application.

For further information, contact Greg Suber, License Renewal Project Manager, Division of

Regulatory Improvement Programs, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Mail Stop O11-F1, Washington, D.C. 20555; telephone 301-415-1124. 

###
§ 220.14 Confidential business information. ( a ) *In general.* The Commission will not release information which the Commission considers to be confidential business information within the meaning of § 201.6(a) of this chapter unless the party submitting the confidential business information had notice, at the time of submission, that such information would be released by the Commission, or such party subsequently consents to the release of the information.
( b ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) In calculating the estimated revenue loss required under the Act, the Commission may base its estimates in whole or in part on the estimated values of imports submitted by petitioners in their petitions.
( 2 ) The Commission may disclose some or all of the confidential business information provided to the Commission in petitions and public comments to the U.S. Department of Commerce for use in preparing its report to the Commission and the Committees, and to the U.S. Department of Agriculture and CBP for use in providing information for Commerce's report.
[81 FR 67149, Sept. 30, 2016. Redesignated at 84 FR 44693, Aug. 27, 2019]
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 23,
2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Teligent, Inc.
included in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 and the related
financial statement schedule included therein, in the Registration Statement
Number 333-45005 on Form S-8, Registration Statement Number 333-80469 on Form
S-3, Registration Statement Number 333-93241 on Form S-8, and Registration
Statement Number 333-52456 on Form S-8.

McLean, Virginia
March 30, 2001
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1493

To revoke an Executive Order relating to procedures for the consideration 

of claims of constitutionally based privilege against disclosure of Presidential records. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2003

Mr. OSE (for himself, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. CLAY, Mr. 

LATOURETTE, Mr. LYNCH, Mr. PAUL, and Ms. WATSON) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To revoke an Executive Order relating to procedures for 

the consideration of claims of constitutionally based privilege against disclosure of Presidential records.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REVOCATION OF EXECUTIVE ORDER OF NO4 VEMBER 1, 2001. 

5 Executive Order number 13233, dated November 1, 

6 2001 (66 Fed. Reg. 56025), shall have no force or effect, 
2

•HR 1493 IH 

1 and Executive Order number 12667, dated January 18, 

2 1989 (54 Fed. Reg. 3403), shall apply by its terms.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 19, 2019

t 0618 

# Order

Clerk June 19, 2019

148981 (33)(39 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148981

COA: 319642

Muskegon CC: 12

- 062665

- FH

PAUL J. BETTS, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to strike is GR ANTED. The motion to take

judicial notice is DENIED.
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.840 Accredited Lenders Program (ALP). ( a ) *General.* Under the ALP program, SBA designates qualified CDCs as ALP CDCs, gives them increased authority to process, close, and service 504 loans, and provides expedited processing of loan approval and servicing actions.
( b ) *Application.* A CDC must apply for ALP status by submitting an application in accordance with SBA's Standard Operating Procedure 50 10, available at *http://www.sba.gov .* A final decision will be made by the appropriate SBA official in accordance with Delegations of Authority.
( c ) *Eligibility.* In order for a CDC to be eligible to receive ALP status, its application must show that it meets the criteria set forth in § 120.841.
( d ) *Additional application requirements.* The CDC's application must include the following: ( 1 ) Certified copy of the CDC's Board of Directors' resolution authorizing the application for ALP status.
( 2 ) Summary of the experience of each of the CDC's loan processing, closing, and servicing staff members with significant authority.
( 3 ) Name, address, and summary of experience of Designated Attorney.
( 4 ) Documentation of any SBA required insurance.
( 5 ) Any other documentation required by SBA.
( e ) *Term of ALP designation.* SBA generally will designate a CDC as an ALP CDC for a two-year period. SBA may renew the designation for additional two-year periods if the CDC continues to meet the ALP program eligibility requirements.
( f ) *SBA approval or decline decision.* SBA will notify the CDC in writing of an approval or decline of either an ALP application or of an ALP renewal. If the SBA approves the CDC's application, the ALP CDC may exercise its ALP authority in its entire Area of Operations. If an application or renewal is declined, SBA will notify the CDC of the reasons for the decision.
[68 FR 57982, Oct. 7, 2003, as amended at 85 FR 7651, Feb. 10, 2020; 85 FR 80588, Dec. 14, 2020; 87 FR 38909, June 30, 2022]
### §656. Member User Group

The Speaker of the House of Representatives, after consulting with the Minority Leader of the House, may appoint a Member User Group for the purpose of reviewing budgetary scorekeeping rules and practices of the House and advising the Speaker from time to time on the effect and impact of such rules and practices.

(Pub. L. 93–344, title IV, §406, formerly §407, as added Pub. L. 99–177, title II, §214, Dec. 12, 1985, 99 Stat. 1060; renumbered §406, Pub. L. 105–33, title X, §10116(c)(1), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 692.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 406 of Pub. L. 93–344 was renumbered section 405 and is classified to section 655 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 12, 1985, and applicable with respect to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 1985, see section 275(a)(1) of Pub. L. 99–177, formerly set out as an Effective and Termination Dates note under section 900 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 112–25, title I, §104(a), Aug. 2, 2011, 125 Stat. 246.