United States

Department of

Agriculture

Forest Service

Giant Sequoia

National Monument

August 2010

Giant Sequoia 

National Monument

Draft Management Plan
The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities 

on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual 

orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with 

disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large 

print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To 

file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten 

Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 

(voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Part 1-Vision

Purpose of Monument Plan 6

Relationship of Monument Plan to Other Documents 9

Monument Description 10

Vision 11

Desired Conditions 28

Part 2-Strategy

Land Allocations and Management Areas 39

Suitable Land Uses 47

Strategies and Objectives 54

Special Areas 77

Part 3-Design Criteria

Legal and Regulatory Compliance 85

Monitoring and Evaluation 100

Appendices

Appendix A-Location Map (California) 115

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

Contents
Appendix B-Location Map (Local) 118

Appendix C-Giant Sequoia Groves List 120

Appendix D-Giant Sequoia Groves Map 122

Appendix E-Partnership Strategy 124

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines 130

Appendix G-Transportation Plan 160

Map Packet

Map Packet 168

List of Figures

Figure 1 Management Direction and Guidance for the Monument 9

Figure 2 Trumping Order for Land Allocations from the 2001 SNFPA 42

Figure 3 Overview of Adaptive Management Based on Scientific Study and Monitoring 55

List of Tables

Table 1 Named Giant Sequoias 14

Table 2 Acres of Land Allocations/Management Areas 40

Table 3 Dominant Management Direction When Land Allocations/Management Areas Overlap 44

Table 4 Suitable Land Uses and Activities by Static Land Allocation or Management Area 49

Table 5 Suitable Land Uses and Activities by Overlapping Land Allocation or Management Area 52

Table 6 Strategies for Scientific Study and Adaptive Management 55

Table 7 Strategies Specific to Giant Sequoia Groves 56

Table 8 Strategies for Climate Change/Carbon Sequestration 57

Table 9 Strategies for Ecological Restoration 57

Table 10 Strategy for Tree Species Regeneration 58

Table 11 Strategies for Biomass Removal 58

Table 12 Strategy for Pest Management 58

Table 13 Strategies for Fire and Fuels 60

Table 14 Strategies for Fuels Reduction 61

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

Contents
Table 15 Strategies Specific to WUI Management 64

Table 16 Strategies for Air Quality 64

Table 17 Strategies for Wildlife and Plant Habitat 65

Table 18 Strategies for Range 66

Table 19 Strategies for Hydrological Resources 66

Table 20 Strategies for Meadow Restoration 67

Table 21 Strategies for Groundwater 68

Table 22 Strategies for Geological Resources 68

Table 23 Strategies for Paleontological Resources 69

Table 24 Strategies for Soils 69

Table 25 Strategies for Human Use 70

Table 26 Strategies for Cultural Resources 74

Table 27 Strategies for Transportation System 74

Table 28 Strategies for Special Areas 76

Table 29 Non-Wilderness Roadless Areas 79

Table 30 Monitoring Plan 102

Table 31 Sequoia Groves and Grove Complexes 120

Table 32 Standards and Guidelines 130

Table 33 Miles of Roads in the Monument by Maintenance Level 162

Table 34 Miles of Road by Functional Class 162

Table 35 Table Potential Risk and Need Equivalent Combination Ratings 166

List of Maps

Map 1 Recreation Niche Settings for the Northern Portion of the Monument 16

Map 2 Recreation Niche Settings for the Southern Portion of the Monument 17

Map 3 Tribal Fuels Emphasis Treatment Area 63

Map 4 Special Areas in the Monument 81

Map 5 Location of the Monument (California) 116

Map 6 Location Map (Local) 118

Map 7 Giant Sequoia Groves 122

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

Contents
Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

Empty Region
Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan 5

Part 1-Vision
GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

6

Purpose of Monument Plan
Part I-Vision

Purpose of the Monument Plan

The purpose of the Giant Sequoia National Monument Management Plan (Monument Plan) is to provide overall

strategic guidance for managing the Giant Sequoia National Monument (Monument). This plan provides for and

encourages continued public and recreational access and use consistent with the purposes of the Monument (Clinton

2000, p. 24097). It contributes to social, economic, and ecological sustainability by guiding the restoration or

maintenance of the health of the land in the Monument.

This draft Monument Plan was developed for the preferred alternative, Alternative F, as identified in the Giant

Sequoia National Monument Draft Environmental Impact Statement (draft EIS). The draft EIS describesthe analysis

used in formulating the draft Monument Plan. Identifying the preferred alternative in the draft EIS and the draft

Monument Plan does not constitute a decision, but issimply a position or preference at the time these draft documents

are published for public comment.

The Monument Plan provides the strategic direction at the broad program level for managing the Monument and

its resources over the next 10 to 15 years. It includes the direction required by the Proclamation and it replaces, in

its entirety, all previous management direction for the Monument, including the direction in the Forest Plan for this

part of the Sequoia National Forest. It is the single comprehensive management plan for this area. While the

Monument Plan is a stand-alone document, it is also a subset of the entire Forest Plan.

This strategic direction was developed by an interdisciplinary planning team working with forest staff, making use

of extensive public involvement and collaboration, and the best science available. The Monument Plan implements

the Proclamation by providing guidance to protect the objects of interest, restore ecosystems, and provide

opportunitiesfor public use. It provides a context for informed decision making, while guiding resource management

programs, practices, uses, and projects. It will guide the development and analysis of resource management activities

in future site-specific projects to move resources toward the desired conditions for the Monument.

This plan does not include any decisions on specific projects or activities. Those decisions will be made later, after

more detailed analysis of specific project sites and additional public involvement on site-specific proposals.

Compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is required for any project-level decision that

may have an impact on the environment. Project-level decisions must be informed by site-specific analysis through

an open, public process.

The Monument Plan is adaptive in that new knowledge and information can be analyzed and the plan changed, if

appropriate, at any time. It provides overall intent and guidance, but providesthe flexibility needed for the responsible

official to work with the public and adapt management strategies to the constantly changing demands that are

inherent to natural resource management. It defines the parameters (limits) for management but allows for the

adjustment of future project-level decisions to accommodate rapidly changing social and resource conditions. This

allows the latest science and public input to be employed at the time a decision is to be made.

The Monument Plan was prepared according to the requirements of the National Forest Management Act (NFMA),

the NEPA, and other laws and regulations.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

7

Purpose of Monument Plan
Comments: 1

Organization of the Monument Plan

This Monument Plan consists of three interrelated parts that work together to facilitate the use of adaptive

management and the development of management activities that will move the Monument toward the desired

conditions. Part 1-Vision paints the picture of the conditions desired in the long term. Part 2-Strategy contains the

strategic management direction. Part 3-Design Criteria contains the guidance for designing actions and activities

in order to make progress toward the vision and desired conditions described in Part 1.

Part 1 is the Vision for the Monument. It describes the purpose of the Monument Plan, the relationship of the

Monument Plan to other documents, and a description of the Monument. Part 1 includes the Monument niche (the

Monument's uniqueness on a national and regional level) and its recreation niche. Part 1 also describes the desired

conditions (36 CFR 219.11(b)(1)) for the resources of the Monument.

Part 2 is the Strategy for the Monument. It begins by identifying generally suitable land uses and activities for the

Monument. It then lays out the management strategies and objectives (36 CFR 219.11 (b)(2)) that the Forest Service

will strive to achieve in order to move the Monument toward the desired conditions described in Part 1. Part 2 also

identifies special areas in the Monument (36 CFR 219.17(3)), as well as the land allocations and management areas

(36 CFR 219.11(c)(4)) for the Monument.

Part 3 is the Design Criteria for the Monument. The design criteria include the laws and regulations, the standards

and guidelines (36 CFR 219.11(c) and 219.13 through 219.29(5)), and the monitoring and evaluation procedures

that will be used during site-specific project planning and implementation. Design criteria are sideboards for

subsequent projects and activities to help achieve the desired conditions.

Comments: 2

1 These are 1982 regulations that are no longer in the CFR, but are still applicable to this plan amendment.

2 Ibid.

3 Ibid.

4 Ibid.

5 Ibid.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

8

Purpose of Monument Plan
Figure 1 Management Direction and Guidance for the Monument

The Record of Decision (ROD) for the Monument Plan EIS amends the existing 1988 Forest Plan, as amended by

the 1991 Kings River Wild and Scenic River and Special Management Area Implementation Plan (KRSMA), the

2001 Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment (2001 SNFPA), and the 2007 Sierra Nevada Forest Management

Indicator Species Amendment (SNF MIS). The Monument Plan was developed using the guidance and management

direction provided by the 1990 Mediated Settlement Agreement (MSA) and is constrained by that which is applicable

to the Monument and consistent with the Proclamation. The Monument Plan also considers the 2004 Sierra Nevada

Forest Plan Amendment (2004 SNFPA), but is not constrained by its management recommendations. The Monument

Plan was guided by the best available science, a thorough review of relevant scientific information, and practical

experience, as required by national forest planning direction and the Proclamation.

Comments: 3

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

9

Relationship of Monument Plan to Other Documents
The Giant Sequoia National Monument (Monument) is located in south-central California and is administered by

the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Forest Service, Sequoia National Forest (see location maps

in Appendices A and B). Created by presidential proclamation on April 15, 2000, the "rich and varied landscape

of the Giant Sequoia National Monument holds a diverse array of scientific and historic resources. Magnificent

groves of towering giant sequoias, the world's largest trees, are interspersed within a great belt of coniferous forest,

jeweled with mountain meadows. Bold granitic domes, spires, and plunging gorges texture the landscape" (Clinton

2000, p. 24095).

Comments: 4

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

10

Monument Description
The Monument is set apart and reserved for the purpose of protecting the objects of interest identified in the

Proclamation, for their proper care and management (Clinton 2000). The objects of interest were generally identified

in the Proclamation, with the requirement that the Monument Plan provide direction for their proper care. Through

public and agency dialogue, the objects of interest have been determined to be a mix of individual objects or

locations (such as specific caverns or named sequoias) and broad ecosystems with their natural processes. For the

purpose of managing the Monument, the Forest Service has refined the list of objects of interest as follows:

The naturally-occurring giant sequoia groves and their associated ecosystems, individual giant trees, and other

rare and endemic plant species listed as threatened, endangered, or sensitive by the Endangered Species Act

or the Forest Service.

The ecosystems and outstanding landscapes that surround the giant sequoia groves.

The diverse array of rare animalspecies, including the Pacific fisher; the great gray owl; the American marten;

the northern goshawk; the peregrine falcon; the California spotted owl; the California condor; several rare

amphibians; the western pond turtle; and other species listed as threatened, endangered, or sensitive by the

Endangered Species Act or the Forest Service.

The paleontological resources in meadow sediments and other sources of recorded ecological changes such

as fire regimes, volcanism, vegetation, and climate.

The limestone caverns and other geological features, including granite domes, spires, geothermally produced

hot springs and soda springs, and glacial and river-carved gorges.

Cultural resources, both historic and prehistoric, which provide a record of human adaptation to the landscape

and land use patterns that have shaped ecosystems.

The Monument provides for and encourages continued public and recreational access and use consistent with

protecting the objects of interest (Clinton 2000). The Monument provides exemplary opportunities for biologists,

geologists, paleontologists, archaeologists, and historians to study the objects of interest; for understanding ongoing

environmental changes; and for studying forest resilience and the consequences of different approaches to forest

restoration (Clinton 2000).

Comments: 5

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

11

Vision
GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

12

Vision
Monument Niche

Picture 1 President Clintonnext to the

giant sequoia where the proclamation

was signed (April 2000)

Giantsequoias(Sequoiadendron giganteum) grow only on the western slopes

of the Sierra Nevada mountain range in California. These trees can tower

270 feet high and reach 30 feet in diameter. Located at the southernmost end

of the Sierra Nevada in central California, the Sequoia National Forest, named

for the world’s largest trees, contains the greatest concentration of giant

sequoia groves in the world. Thirty-three groves and the areas around them

are protected within the Giant Sequoia National Monument (Monument) (see

the list in Appendix C and the map in Appendix D).

The Monument is unique as it is the only national monument in California

that was designated by presidential proclamation. With authority vested in

the American Antiquities Act of 1906, in April 2000, President Clinton set

aside and reserved the Monument for the purpose of protecting the objects

of interest.

The rich and varied landscape of the Giant Sequoia National Monument

holds a diverse array of scientific and historic resources. Magnificent

groves of towering giant sequoias, the world’s largest trees, are

interspersed within a great belt of coniferous forest, jeweled with

mountain meadows. Bold granitic domes, spires, and plunging gorges

texture the landscape. The area's elevation climbs from about 2,500

to 9,700 feet over a distance of only a few miles, capturing an

extraordinary number of habitats within a relatively small area. This

spectrum of ecosystems is home to a diverse array of plants and

animals, many of which are rare or endemic to the southern Sierra

Nevada. The monument embraceslimestone caverns and holds unique

paleontological resources documenting tens of thousands of years of

ecosystem change. The monument also has many archaeological sites

recording Native American occupation and adaptationsto this complex

landscape, and historic remnants of early Euroamerican settlement as well as the commercial exploitation

of the giant sequoias (Clinton 2000).

The Monument’slandscape is asspectacular asitstrees. Soaring granite monoliths, glacier-carved canyons, limestone

caves, roaring world-class whitewater, and scenic lakes and reservoirs await visitors’ discovery at the Sierra Nevada's

southern reach. The Monument offers visitors spectacular views in a dramatic range of settings. These mountains

stand in contrast to California’s San Joaquin Valley, providing cool relief for families from the scorching heat of

summer and welcome blue skies and sun during the cold fog of winter. From the dramatic Kings Canyon, through

the ancient giant sequoias, down to the mighty Kern River, the Monument features diverse settings and special

places.

The Monument is well-known for these settings and places. These settings, as well as other outstanding features

that are less well-known, are important to individuals and create strong connectionsto place, which may come from

personal experience or from someone else's experience. Places have particular meaning for individuals, and each

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

13

Vision
person can have that attachment for a different place or multiple locations, which may vary with the activity, such

as a favorite camping spot, or a favorite trail, or a favorite vista point. No one place can satisfy that connection for

all people. The place and the reason for the attachment are as individual as the person.

The Giant Sequoia National Monument is a unique place, highly valued by its neighbors, visitors, and distant

admirers. Giant sequoias are a symbolic vestige of the wild Sierra, evoking a deep emotional response, even from

people who have never experienced their grandeur firsthand.

Over the years, people have named a number of individual giant sequoia trees or stumps. Some of these trees or

stumps have multiple names. The reason they were named is often unknown and is the subject of speculation and

stories passed down through the generations. These named trees orstumps are still important to people and represent

part of the cultural landscape of the Monument. However, current Forest Service policy is to avoid any further

naming of giant sequoia trees. The table below lists the known officially named giant sequoia trees and stumps in

the Monument. Named giantsequoia have either been identified on the forest recreation map or in officially published

documents such as The Giant Sequoias of California, published by the United States Government Printing Office

in 1942.

Table 1 Named Giant Sequoias

Tree Stump Grove Name Ranger District Remarks

Largest giant sequoia on National forest

System lands

Converse Basin (includes Hume Lake

Cabin Creek Grove)

Boole

Formerly the General Noble Tree -- cut for

the 1893 World Fair in Chicago

Chicago Stump Converse Basin Hume Lake

Names for President George H. W. Bush in

1992

Bush Freeman Creek Western Divide

Comments: 6

Recreation Niche

The recreation niche is what the Monument has to offer in terms of special places, opportunities, and potential

experiences, overlapped with what people desire and expect in terms of outdoor recreation from public lands. The

Monument is best known for particular attributes or settings, including giant sequoias and their ecosystems. The

following settings can be found within the Monument:

Rivers and Lakes. Water is the magnet, featuring world-class whitewater and attracting family use at Hume

Lake and the Kern, Kings, and Tule rivers (high niche conformance(6)).

6 How well those settingsfit with what the forest is known for is called niche conformance. However, just because a setting

is noted as having low or moderate niche conformance does not mean that those settings are not important to individuals;

their own connection to place may be strongest for some of those locations.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

14

Vision
Scenic Routes. These routes offer great views through a range of life zones, providing access to adventure

and discovery (high niche conformance).

Great Western Divide. Giant sequoias and dispersed recreation (high niche conformance).

Lloyd Meadow. Spectacular Kern Canyon views; rock climbing on granite formations; dispersed recreation;

giant sequoias (high niche conformance).

Hume High Elevation. Overnight destination with giantsequoia logging history; wilderness access; intertwined

with national parks (high niche conformance).

Wildlands. Includes parts of two wildernesses in the Monument and a few other areas, offering solitude and

scenic backdrop (moderate niche conformance).

Front Country. Year-round access; desirable in spring (wildflowers) and fall (hunting); very hot in summer;

chaparral, oak to mixed conifer (low niche conformance).

Kings River Special Management Area OHV.Off-highway vehicle (OHV) use in the Monument, authorized

by law; this steep canyon offers motorized trails with solitude (low niche conformance).

Maps 1 and 2 display the recreation niche settings established for the Monument.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

15

Vision
Map 1 Recreation Niche Settings for the Northern Portion of the Monument

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

16

Vision
Map 2 Recreation Niche Settings for the Southern Portion of the Monument

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

17

Vision
Comments: 7

The recreation niche settings, as delineated for the entire Sequoia National Forest, are further divided into places

and are described as follows:

Picture 2 Grizzly Fallsin Kings Canyon Rivers and Lakes

Kings River. The Kings River forms the boundary between the Sierra

National Forest and the Sequoia National Forest. Portions of the river in

both forests are designated as wild and scenic. The Kings River Special

Management Area (KRSMA), a congressionally designated area, also lies

in both forests, but is administered by the Sierra. The river formed the

world-renowned Kings Canyon, which is more than 8,000 feet deep, located

in both the national forest and the adjacent Kings Canyon National Park.

Both the Middle and South Forks begin in Kings Canyon National Park and

flow down through portions of the Monarch Wilderness in the national

forests.

Highway 180, which is the Kings Canyon Scenic Byway, drops into the

Kings River gorge along the South Fork and providesthe only vehicle access

to the Cedar Grove portion of Kings Canyon National Park. This highway

provides access for sightseeing tourists along the South Fork of the Kings

River, to Cedar Grove, and to the wilderness trailheads. This is a prime fly

fishing area.

The junction of the South and Middle Forks is also the eastern boundary of

the KRSMA, which extends west along the main stem of the Kings River

to Mill Flat Campground, and includesthe surrounding lands up to the main

ridges of the Kings River Gorge. This section of the river has steep terrain

and very limited access, so this part of the KRSMA has little visitation. It

is visited mostly by anglers accessing the river on the Yucca Point or Mill

Flat Creek Trails (Forest Trails 28E01 and 27E01).

From Mill Flat Campground west to Pine Flat Reservoir, Mountain Road 2 and Road 12S01 provide vehicle access

to the river. Portions of the Kings River are famous for whitewater rafting and fly fishing.

The main stem of the Kings River (west of KRSMA) is popular with activity-oriented adventure seekers such as

whitewater rafters (managed by the Sierra National Forest), anglers, water players (couples and families), and social

gatherers.

Important Storyline: The upper portion of the Kings River that travels through the Sequoia National Forest is

within the world-renowned Kings Canyon. This portion of the river canyon was carved by glaciers that extended

downstream along the South Fork of the Kings River to Grizzly Falls. The glaciers formed a U-shaped valley with

outstanding geological features, including marble pendants, folded rocks, and limestone caves. In this area, the

wild and scenic river and the scenic byway cut the Monarch Wilderness in two.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

18

Vision
The main stem of the Kings River begins where the South Fork and Middle Fork join and flow west through the

KRSMA, emptying into Pine Flat Reservoir. The main stem once provided the route for the longest known lumber

flume, which carried lumber harvested from treesin the area and processed at the Millwood and Hume Lake facilities

to Sanger. The flume tender and a Forest Service guard station were located at the 41⁄2-mile marker along the flume.

Today these locations are recreation areas, and the guard station is available for overnight rental. This storyline

will be showcased on wayside exhibits, on information boards, in publications, and in self-guided tours.

Picture 3 Hume Lake

Hume Lake. This area includes the Hume Lake

Campground, multiple day use sites, a group camp, and

a recreation residence tract. The lake was once a mill

pond created by the Hume Bennett Lumber Company

during the historic logging period. Now the lake draws

huge crowds during the summer months. The

campground is often full. People staying overnight in

other areas often use the facilities here during the day.

At about 6,000 feet in elevation, the reservoir islocated

in mixed conifer forest within the Monument. The

Hume Lake Dam, designed by John Eastwood in 1908,

is the first concrete-reinforced multiple arch dam to be

constructed in the United States. The dam is being

considered for nomination as a national historic landmark. An interpretive trail was developed around the lake, part

of which is accessible for persons with disabilities. The Hume Lake Christian Conference, which is highly developed

and nationally known, is located on private land at one end of the lake and is open year-round.

Forest experience seekers, anglers, water players, and social gatherers use the area. Sightseeing tourists overflow

from the national parks and the Hume Lake Christian Conference. Because of these influences, visitors tend to be

family-oriented and very interested in learning. Overnight camping, non-motorized boating, picnicking, fishing,

water play, and hiking are popular activities.

Important Storyline: Hume Lake was built between 1908 and1909 as a log pond for the historic Hume Bennett

Mill. Hume Lake Dam is the first concrete-reinforced multiple arch dam built in the United States. The timber

operation harvested pine, fir, cedar, and giant sequoia from 1908 to 1917. The long flume began at the lake and

transported lumber milled there to the Kings River via Tenmile Creek, and on to Sanger. Today the lake is a popular

recreation destination and provides riparian habitat for wildlife in a mixed conifer forest. This storyline will be

shared on wayside exhibits, on information boards, in publications, in personal contact services, and in the

development of visitor information services.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

19

Vision
Picture 4 Tule River Tule River. Originating in high-elevation alpine meadows, the three

branches of the Tule River flow through the Monument. Steep canyons

escort the three forks as they drop in elevation and meet in Lake Success

reservoir. The rural community of Springville, at 1,000 feet elevation, is

developing quickly and serves as a gateway to the Monument. The Tule

River Indian Reservation, the second largest in California, surrounds the

South Fork of the Tule River. Special management challengesinclude fire,

hydroelectric power projects, Native American values, tribal relations,

urban interface, crowd and traffic control, litter, graffiti, and gang-related

problems.

The Tule River corridor is a year-round refuge for recreation,

providing relaxation for neighbors (communities of Porterville,

Springville, Pierpoint Springs, Camp Nelson, Sequoia Crest,

Ponderosa), anglers and hunters, social gatherers, water players

(residents of the central valley), and sightseeing tourists. Proximity

and easy access allow lower income groups to frequently use the river

corridor. Visitors have large youth, Hispanic, and Asian components.

The rapidly developing community of Springville is attracting retirees and

families from the urban areas of California, many of whom have little

experience with the urban/wildland issues of a foothill community.

Important Storyline: The Tule River is a relatively small river but it has a large impact. The river originates in

wilderness, and travels through a wide variety of fire-evolved plant communities as it descends steep slopes to the

central valley floor. In most years, all the water in this river is used and re-used before it can reach its historic

destination of Tulare Lake. The Tule River corridor is a product of the loss of open space, one of the forest’s best

illustrations of the impact of urbanization on wildlands along a major recreation route. Ranches are being subdivided

into smaller single-family residence tracts, and new residents need information and education about living

“eco-friendly” and “fire safe.” The entire Tule River drainage was once home to the Yokuts. Today their home is

the Tule River Indian Reservation. This storyline will be showcased on wayside exhibits, in self-service visitor

information kiosks at gateway communities, on information boards, in publications, on self-guided tours, with

personal contacts, and in partnerships in visitor information services.

Comments: 8

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

20

Vision
Scenic Routes Picture 5 Kings Canyon

Kings Canyon Scenic Byway. This scenic route transects a number of

recreation settings: Front Country, Hume High Elevation, and Rivers and

Lakes. This scenic route is the only designated national forest scenic byway

in the Sequoia National Forest, and it provides the only vehicle access into

the world-renowned Kings Canyon. This area of the forest is strongly

influenced by visitors to the Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks.

Grant Grove, the Kings River, the Monarch Wilderness, Grizzly Falls, and

Boyden Cavern are popular attractions along the route. Elevations range

from 2,000 to 8,000 feet.

Sightseeing tourists (accessing the national parks) and forest experience

seekers (central valley residents escaping the summer heat) use the route to

reach favorite recreation destinations. Some wilderness users travel this

route to reach backcountry and wilderness. Environmental students and

geology enthusiasts are drawn to the rare folded rock formations along the

highway and other outstanding geological characteristics.

Important Storyline: The Kings Canyon Scenic Byway takesthe visitor to world-class natural wonders and through

many of the southern Sierra life zones. Visitors travel through grasslands, oak woodlands, chaparral, mixed conifer

forests, giant sequoia groves, red fir forests, and riparian woodlands along the Kings River. On the way to the

canyon, the route passes through Big Stump Grove and General Grant Grove in the Kings Canyon National Park.

As the route descends, views into Cherry Gap, Converse Basin, and Indian Basin Groves reveal ancient giant

sequoia stumpsfrom the historic logging period, and panoramic vistas of Kings Canyon delight the traveler. Unusual

displays of folded rocks and marble roof pendants can be viewed from the road cut by prison convicts through the

Kings River Gorge, one of the deepest canyons in North America. The road splits the Monarch Wilderness in two

before it delivers the traveler to Kings Canyon National Park, where the road ends past Cedar Grove. This area will

be showcased on wayside exhibits, in self-service visitor information kiosks, on information boards, on self-guided

tours, in personal contact services, and in partnerships in visitor information services.

Comments: 9

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

21

Vision
Picture 6 Dome Rock vista Great Western Divide

Western Divide Highway. Steep mountains with

granite outcrops rising from 4,500 feet to 10,000 feet

in elevation, mixed conifer forests with multiple giant

sequoia groves, and mountain meadows characterize

this area. This setting is in the Monument and shares a

boundary with the Tule River Indian Reservation.

Severalsmall residential communities, recreation rental

cabins, and recreation residences are in this setting.

Special management challenges include giant sequoia

health, fisher habitat, off-highway vehicle (OHV) and

over-snow vehicle (OSV) use, tribal relations, public

use and the need for patrols, wildland urban intermix,

and proximity to Mountain Home State Forest. OHVs

and OSVs are restricted to designated roads and are not

allowed on trails. Mechanized use (e.g., mountain bikes) is limited to designated roads and trails.

Visitors include sightseeing tourists, including international visitors from European and Asian countries, forest

experience seekers and their families escaping the heat of summer, and individuals from all market zones. Hispanic

and Southeast Asian visitation isincreasing. Hunters, anglers, and traditional usersfrequent developed and dispersed

camping sites. Activity-oriented adventure seekers are attracted to outstanding rock climbing opportunities, stock

use, hiking, mountain biking, cross-country skiing, and OHV and OSV use.

Important Storyline: The Great Western Divide is the ridgeline that separates the Sierra Nevada range into two

watersheds, that of the Kern River flowing into Buena Vista Lake, and that of Tulare Lake. President Clinton visited

the Long Meadow Grove and established the Monument by presidential proclamation on April 15, 2000. This area

has 19 recorded giantsequoia groves. Old growth forests provide habitat for rare wildlife speciessuch asthe Pacific

fisher. The last California condor chick found living in the wild was removed from a nest in a giant sequoia in

Starvation Grove in 1982. Needles and Dome Rock are spectacular, high-profile granite monoliths seen from the

highway. Slate Mountain is an unusual and prominent landmark with a botanical area hosting rare plants. Jordan,

Mule Peak, and Needles lookouts are still in operation as fire lookouts, and they are open to the public. This area

will be showcased on wayside exhibits, in self-service visitor information kiosks, on information boards, in

publications, on self-guided tours, in personal contact services, and in partnerships in visitor information services.

Comments: 10

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

22

Vision
Picture 7 The President Bush Tree in Freeman

Creek Grove

Lloyd Meadow

This high mountain shelf, in the Monument between the Western

Divide and the Kern Plateau, has an average elevation of 5,500 feet.

The southern third of this meadow was burned in the McNally Fire

of 2002. Granite formations and expansive vistas of the Kern River

and Kern Plateau are enjoyed from many areas. Special management

challenges include lost visitors, visitor safety, patrolling, and litter.

Activity-oriented adventure seekers (rock climbers, equestrians),

social gatherers, forest experience seekers, traditional users, hunters,

anglers, and wilderness users (accessing trailheads or coming from

organizational camps) are predominantly white and local. This area

is a generational destination and family use area. Native American,

international, and out-of-state use is increasing. Organizational

camps contribute a youth component in the summer. Popular

activities are dispersed camping, water play at the “tubs and slides,”

equestrian use, developed camping, group use (non-commercial),

rafting and kayaking the Forks of the Kern, hunting, fishing, rock

climbing, hiking, mountain biking, and viewing the George Bush

Tree. Outfitter guides provide services for some of these activities.

This area contains the only access point for boaters starting the Forks of the Kern run and provides early season

access to wilderness.

Important Storyline: Eastside pine (ponderosa) forests with giant sequoia and gray pine mark a transition between

the drier forests of the Kern Plateau and moister forests of the Great Western Divide, with excellent birds-eye views

of the Kern River Canyon. The McNally Fire burned about 1/3 of this area, and some areas can be used to tell the

story of regeneration after disturbance. Visitor use of the Lloyd Meadow area is mostly dispersed and the remote

location makes self-policing and personal responsibility important messages for the public. The Freeman Creek

Grove is the easternmost giant sequoia grove--ancient monarchs include the George Bush Tree. The Forks of the

Kern and Jerkey Trails provide access to the Golden Trout Wilderness. This area provides the earliest wilderness

access in spring or early summer, when most other access is still under snow. The Forks of the Kern Trailhead is

the only access point for the Class V Forks whitewater run. Wilderness permits are needed for overnight stays in

the Golden Trout Wilderness and for wildernesses in the national parks. This area will be showcased on wayside

exhibits and interpretive panels, in self-service visitor information kiosks, on information boards, in publications,

in personal contact services, and in partnerships in visitor information services.

Comments: 11

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

23

Vision
Picture 8 Buck Rock Lookout Hume High Elevation

Located in the northern portion of the Monument in the

Hume Lake Ranger District, this area is strongly

influenced by the national parks and the Hume Lake

Christian Camps. Elevationsrange from 4,000 to 8,000

feet in mixed conifer forest, with one of the largest

concentrations of giant sequoia groves. Visitors have

many opportunitiesto discover and explore these groves

in their natural, wild condition, while enjoying

outstanding scenery, including vistas of the Sierra high

country and into Kings Canyon. Special management

challengesinclude coordination of the fee program with

the National Park Service.

Year-round use is by sightseeing tourists (many are

out-of-state and international), traditional users with

long-standing family traditions, forest experience seekers (mostly central valley residents, with nontraditional user

groups of Hispanic and Hmong), some activity-oriented adventure seekers (equestrian camp), wilderness users,

and environmental students and enthusiasts visiting the sequoia groves. Popular activities include camping in

developed sites, day use, social gatherings, dispersed camping, hiking, equestrian camping, hunting, fishing, rock

climbing, and OHV and OSV use (designated roads only). This area provides wilderness access, two resorts, a

recreation rental cabin, and organizational camps.

Important Storyline: Thirteen giantsequoia groves are located in this area, including the two largest, with associated

mixed conifer to red fir forests and granite and basalt outcrops. The historic logging of giant sequoias is a story

unique to this area of the forest. Converse Basin, the largest grove, was the site of the most extensive giant sequoia

logging operation. Giant specimen stumps remain after 100 years, presenting the best opportunities in the forest to

tell the historic logging story. Buck Rock Lookout, which isstaffed with volunteersfrom the Buck Rock Foundation,

functions as a fire lookout and is open to the public. In the Big Meadows area, the traditional grazing, guard station,

and family history of Sam and Jennie Ellis are significant stories. Big Meadows guard station is available as a

recreation rental cabin. This area will be showcased on wayside exhibits, in self-service visitor information kiosks,

on information boards, in publications, on self-guided tours, in personal contact services, and in partnerships in

visitor information services.

Comments: 12

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

24

Vision
W Picture 9 Golden Trout Wilderness ildlands

Wildlands include designated Wilderness and a few other

areas with limited access. The following places are in the

Monument: parts of the Golden Trout Wilderness and the

Monarch Wilderness, the Agnew Roadless Area, and part of

the KRSMA (non-OHV area).

Thissetting offersthe best opportunitiesforsolitude and those

recreation experiences centered on self-reliance. No developed

facilities and very, very steep slopes characterize these lands.

Many areas have significant geological formations. Historic

cabins and trails, and a wide range of settings and physical

challenges, draw visitors who desire experiences in these

remote locations; wilderness does not attract a large number

of visitors to the Sequoia. Special management challenges include shared management and needed coordination

for some of these areas (the Monarch is shared with the Sierra National Forest, the Golden Trout and South Sierra

are shared with the Inyo National Forest, and the KRSMA is administered by the Sierra National Forest), managed

wildfire, grazing, private inholdings, administrative facilities, trail maintenance, group use management, feral pigs,

threatened and endangered species, OHV trespass and encroachment, permits, marijuana cultivation, and

archaeological site protection. All of the designated wilderness areas have a party size limit of 15 people and 25

head of stock.

Wilderness users consist of individuals and small groups of hikers (usually younger and mostly white) and stock

users (usually older and white). Day users are more diverse. Visitors are generally tough, adventurous types, and

use is predominantly in the summer months. Outfitter guides operate in these areas, bringing in anglers, hunters,

and sightseers.

Important Storyline: This area will be showcased on information boards, in publications, on websites, and in

personal contact services.

Comments: 13

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

25

Vision
Picture 10 California condor in flight Front Country

This setting is a desirable destination for visitors in spring and fall,

when temperatures are moderate and snow prevents access to higher

elevations, and less desirable in the heat of summer. During the spring,

the hillsides are dressed in spectacular displays of wildflowers. Often

referred to as the foothills, the landscape progresses uphill from

grasslands, chaparral, and oak woodland to mixed conifer forest.

Elevations range from 1,000 to 4,500 feet, with decomposed granite

and erosive soils. These areas are subject to fire, by nature, and the

wildland urban intermix increases that risk. Special management

challenges include the control of marijuana cultivation, OHV trespass, tribal relations, lack of Forest Service

presence in the field, grazing, wildland urban intermix, and fire control.

Activity-oriented adventure seekersinclude equestrians during the cool months, hang gliders, hunters, hikers, OHV

users, and dog trainers. A diverse group, most are day using neighbors. Spring wildflower displays attract visitors

driving for pleasure.

Important Storyline: This area often overlaps with the wildland urban intermix (WUI), and it is generally steep

and prone to fire. Critical habitat for the California condor is found here and includes a rock outcrop known as the

condor bathtubs. These rock pools would fill with water after storms, and, when condors were more numerous,

they would bathe in them. Delilah Lookout is operational as a fire lookout and open to the public. Poso Guard

Station is now a recreation rental cabin. This area will be showcased in personal contact services.

Comments: 14

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

26

Vision
Kings River Special Management Ar Picture 11 Kings River Special Management Area ea

(KRSMA) OHV

The portion of this area located in the Monument is

bounded on the north by the Kings River and has

the only two OHV trails in the Monument, as

authorized by the legislation that created the

KRSMA. This area is generally steep, with brushand grass-covered canyons, is not very accessible,

and provides great opportunitiesforsolitude. Native

American use and needs may preclude some types

of interpretive efforts. Millwood staging area and

Mill Flat Campground are the access points to this

area, via the Davis Road (12S01). The existing OHV

route is currently impassable, even for a dirt bike.

Visitors consist of OHV users and local hunters.

Special management challenges include shared

management and needed coordination for the KRSMA, which is administered by the Sierra National Forest.

Important Storyline: This area has the only OHV trails in the Monument. The terrain is very steep, limiting access

to a few trails for advanced and expert riders. During the historic logging period, a flume was maintained along

Mill Flat Creek to the Kings River, originating at the town of Millwood. Sampson Flat isthe location where outlaws

Evans and Sontag hid and were involved in a gunfight with a sheriff’s posse. Mill Flat Creek is a critical aquatic

refuge. Grazing, wildlife, and prehistoric use are potentially important stories. The area would be showcased on

wayside exhibits, on information boards, and in personal contact services.

Comments: 15

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

27

Vision
The desired conditions stated below are descriptions of the ecological, social, and economic attributes toward which

management of the Monument is to be directed. These statements describe a desired future state to achieve for the

key resources or opportunitiesin the Monument. Assuch, they are aspirations and not commitments or final decisions

approving projects and activities, and may be achievable only over a long period of time. They are based upon:

1. The Proclamation (Clinton 2000)

2. Advisories from the Scientific Advisory Board and information presented at the Southern Sierra Science

Symposium

3. Current management direction

4. Public comments on the interpretation of the Proclamation and the proposed action

In response to the Proclamation, the desired conditions are presented by the resource areas that would be affected

by an amendment or other alterations of the current direction provided in the Forest Plan, as amended by the

KRSMA, the 2001 SNFPA, and the 2007 SNF MIS.

Picture 12 An hydrological assessment Scientific Study and Adaptive

Management

Resource management decisions are based on sound

science. Research projects focus on science relevant to

managers. This includes continuous, iterative

collaboration between scientists and managers in the

implementation of research projects.

Comments: 16

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

28

Desired Conditions
V Picture 13 Bearskin Grove egetation, Including Giant Sequoias

Giant Sequoias

Giant sequoias exist within the mixed conifer forest and

vary in density and arrangement, as do associated forest

species. Being especially long-lived, giant sequoias

dominate their surroundings. Smaller and younger giant

sequoias are present. Early seral habitat exists and promotes

giant sequoia regeneration.

Mixed Conifer Forest

The mixed conifer forest varies by both species composition

and structure--as influenced by elevation, site productivity,

and related environmental factors, including

disturbance--and is in balance with climate and other

ecological conditions. The composition is a patchy and a

variable mixture of conifer and hardwood trees, as well as

a diverse mixture of shrubs, herbaceous vegetation, and

grasses. Spatial arrangements vary from pure, or nearly

pure, groupings to complex combinations, often within

relatively limited areas. Low density forests with frequent

canopy openings, varying in size, dominate much of the

landscape, with higher density forests on portions of north

and east aspects.

More frequent openings with early seral structure and

composition (10 percent of the vegetation type) exist within the giant sequoia groves. Some mid-seral structure has

converted to a later seral stage as tree sizes increase. Approximately 70 percent of the mixed conifer within groves

is dominated by trees greater than 24 inches in diameter. Some of the large trees have multi-layered crowns,

producing 60 percent or more canopy cover.

Outside giant sequoia groves, 10 percent of this vegetation type is early seral structure and composition. Almost

half of the mid-seral structure has converted to a later seral stage as tree sizes increase. Approximately 50 percent

of the mixed conifer is dominated by trees greater than 24 inches in diameter. Some of the large trees have

multi-layered crowns, producing 60 percent or more canopy cover.

Blue Oak-Interior Live Oak(7)

Blue oak conditions are maintained at their current condition: a fire regime of low intensity fires, with flame lengths

less than 3 feet; natural vegetation types; a highly variable and complex landscape pattern; and a soil composition

that can maintain the vegetation. Blue oak dominates, with grass and occasional shrubs as the understory. There

are occasional or periodic flushes of regeneration to replace mortality in older trees.

7 Foothill woodlands.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

29

Desired Conditions
Chaparral-Live Oak(8)

Interior and canyon live oak vegetation is a mosaic of varying size and age classes. Large expanses of dense or

older chaparral are broken up by recent disturbances of 10 acres or more, to help slow the spread of fire and

regenerate chaparralspecies. Fire susceptibility and severity are low, and fire hazardsto adjacent human communities

and surrounding forest types are reduced.

Montane Hardwood-Conifer

The montane hardwood/mixed conifer forests vary by both species composition and structure--as influenced by

elevation, site productivity, and related environmental factors, including disturbance--and are in balance with

climate and other ecological conditions. The composition is patchy, with an abundance of large black oaks. More

frequent openings with early seral structure and composition (10 percent of the vegetation type) exist within the

groves. Most mid-seral structure has converted to a later seral stage as tree sizes increase.

Approximately 70 percent of the montane hardwood-conifers within giant sequoia groves is dominated by trees

greater than 24 inches in diameter. Some of the large trees have multi-layered crowns, producing 60 percent or

more canopy cover.

Outside giant sequoia groves, 20 percent of this vegetation type is early seral structure and composition. Over

one-half of the mid-seral structure has converted to later seral as tree sizes increase. Approximately 40 percent of

the mixed conifer is dominated by trees greater than 24 inchesin diameter. Some of the large trees have multi-layered

crowns, producing 60 percent or more canopy cover.

Red Fir

Red fir consists of a mosaic of varying size and age classes, with structural clumping greater than 10 acres, as

necessary for species dependent on this vegetation type. Fire susceptibility and severity are low, and fire hazards

to adjacent human communities and surrounding forest types are reduced.

More frequent openings with early seral structure and composition (10 percent of the vegetation type) exist within

the giantsequoia groves. Some mid-seralstructure has converted to laterseral astree sizesincrease. Approximately

70 percent of the red fir within groves is dominated by trees greater than 24 inches in diameter. Some of the large

trees have multi-layered crowns, producing 60 percent or more canopy cover.

Outside of giant sequoia groves, 10 percent of this vegetation type is early seral structure and composition. Most

mid-seral structure has converted to a later seral stage as tree sizes increase. Approximately 70 percent of the mixed

conifer outside groves is dominated by trees greater than 24 inches in diameter. Some of the large trees have

multi-layered crowns, producing 60 percent or more canopy cover.

Comments: 17

8 Interior and canyon live oaks.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

30

Desired Conditions
Picture 14 Fuels reduction Fire and Fuels

Fire occurs in its characteristic pattern and resumes its

ecological role. Frequent fire maintains lower,

manageable levels of flammable materials, especially

in the surface and understory layers. There is a highly

diverse vegetation mosaic of age classes, tree sizes, and

species composition, and a low risk for uncharacteristic

large, catastrophic fires. The objects of interest are

protected; sustainable environmental, social, and

economic benefits (such as those associated with

tourism) are maintained; and the carbon sequestered in

large trees is stabilized.

Fuel reduction treatmentsin the wildland urban intermix

(WUI) zones are focused on developed areas within

these zones. The need to maintain fuel conditions that support fires characteristic of complex ecosystems is

emphasized, and allows for a natural range of fire to lower fire intensity and protect human life and property on

lands in and adjacent to the Monument.

Comments: 18

Air Quality

Emissions generated by the Monument are limited and managed, and clean air is provided for the Monument and

surrounding communities.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

31

Desired Conditions
Comments: 19

W Picture 15 California spotted owls ildlife and Plant Habitat

Lands within the Monument provide a diverse range of

habitats, with special consideration for native species, riparian

areas, montane meadows, and late successional forests.

Comments: 20

Range

Livestock grazing opportunities are maintained and managed for sustainable, healthy rangelands that contribute to

local economies and improve watershed conditions.

Comments: 21

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

32

Desired Conditions
Picture 16 Big Meadows Hydrological Resources

Streams, meadows, wetlands, and other special aquatic

features have proper hydrologic connectivity(9) and

function, while allowing for beneficial uses(10) in the

Monument.

Comments: 22

Groundwater

Groundwater quality and quantity in aquifers across watersheds are sustained.

Comments: 23

Picture 17 The Needles Lookout

Geological Resources

Geological features are protected while providing for public use and

enjoyment of these resources.

9 Connectivity refers to the relationship between an active channel and its floodplain.

10 Beneficial uses include recreation, grazing, and fire.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

33

Desired Conditions
Comments: 24

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

34

Desired Conditions
Picture 18 Inside a cave Paleontological Resources

Paleontological resources retain the components providing the fossil

record.

Comments: 25

Soils

Productive soil conditions are maintained to promote ecosystem health, diversity, and productivity.

(11)

11 Forest Service Handbook 2509.18 - Soil Management Handbook, R5 Supplement No. 2509.18-95 1 defines supplement

thresholds and indicator values for desired soil conditions.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

35

Desired Conditions
Comments: 26

Picture 19 Learning about giant

Human Use sequoias

The Monument provides wide and varied public use of Monument resources and

opportunities while protecting sensitive resources and the objects of interest.

Recreation use throughout the year is promoted. Visitors find a rich and varied

range of sustainable recreational, educational, and social opportunities enhanced

by giant sequoias and the surrounding ecosystems. Consistent and easy-to-read

signs and informational materials are provided. Interpretation and conservation

education reflect scientifically supported scholarship and research data, conveying

clear messages about natural and cultural resources and multiple use. Partnerships

are established, providing people with a connection to place and promoting a sense

of stewardship. The Monument provides a wide variety of visually appealing

landscapes,such as oak woodland, chaparral, a variety of mixed conifer forest, and

giant sequoia groves, for the public to enjoy within the places they prefer to visit.

Comments: 27

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

36

Desired Conditions
Picture 20 Cultural resource site Cultural Resources

A comprehensive cultural resource management

program places a greater management emphasis on the

rich cultural resources within the Monument as

described in the Proclamation. Cultural resources are

identified and allocated to appropriate management

categories(FSM 2363) (e.g., preservation, enhancement,

scientific investigation, interpretation, release) so that

they can be protected, maintained, studied, and used by

the public.

Comments: 28

Picture 21 Trail of 100 Giants

Transportation System

Safe and fully-maintained roads and trailsthat minimize

adverse resource impacts provide public and

administrative access to National Forest System lands

and facilities within the Monument. Appropriate access

is provided to the objects of interest for their proper

care, protection, and management.

Comments: 29

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

37

Desired Conditions
Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan 38

Part 2-Strategy
Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

39

Land Allocations and Management Areas
Part 2-Strategy

Land Allocations and Management Areas

Land allocations are land areas that are differentiated and named in the 2001 SNFPA or in this Monument Plan

and its EIS. All alternatives have some type of land allocation, and their size may differ by alternative. They are

areas within which different sets of standards and guidelines apply.

Management areas are not land allocations as defined by the 2001 SNFPA, but rather are areas specific to the

Monument with their own distinct management direction. The land allocations and management areas for the

Monument are shown in their entirety on Map A of the Monument Plan map packet.

There are three categories of land allocations/management areasfor the Monument:static, overlapping, and dynamic.

Static land allocations/management areas are those not likely to change in size and location over time. They

include designated wildernesses, wild and scenic river corridors, the Kings River Special Management Area

(KRSMA), backcountry (inventories roadless areas), the giant sequoia groves, old forest emphasis area, the

Southern Sierra Fisher Conservation Area, research natural areas, botanical areas, and a geological area.

Overlapping land allocations/management areas are those that are likely to overlap with static and dynamic

areas. Where they overlap, the area with the most restrictive direction is given priority, as stipulated in the

2001 SNFPA or this document. Land allocations/management areas that have more restrictive management

direction preempt those with less restrictive direction. For example, when a wildland urban intermix (WUI)

defense zone overlaps designated wilderness, the management direction for the more restrictive land

allocation/management area--in this case, the direction for the wilderness area because of the importance of

its legal status--is followed.

Dynamic land allocations/management areas are those that are most likely to change in size and location over

time with the introduction of new information. For example, as Pacific fisher populations are tracked, new

den sites may be identified and mapped. Dynamic land allocations/management areas may, at times, overlap

the other types. Since most of the dynamic land allocations/management areas are related to the protection of

wildlife species, the standards and guidelines associated with them are usually given priority over most land

allocations/management areas they overlap.

The following table shows the acres of land allocations and management areas in the Monument.

Table 2 Acres of Land Allocations/Management Areas

Land Allocation/Management Area (only the portions in the Monument) Acres

STATIC

Wildernesses 13,294

Wild and Scenic Rivers 4,669

Kings River Special Management Area 24,288

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

40

Land Allocations and Management Areas
Land Allocation/Management Area (only the portions in the Monument) Acres

Backcountry (Inventoried Roadless Areas) 80,297

Giant Sequoia Groves 27,830

Old Forest Emphasis Area 153,758

Southern Sierra Fisher Conservation Area 311,149

Research Natural Areas, Botanical Areas, and Geological Area 9,337

OVERLAPPING

Wildland Urban Intermix (WUI) Defense Zone 45,342

WUI Threat Zone 145,522

Tribal Fuels Emphasis Treatment Area (TFETA) 56,643

DYNAMIC

Riparian Conservation Areas (RCAs) and Critical Aquatic Refuges (CARs) 178,002

Willow Flycatcher 86

California Spotted Owl Protected Activity Centers (PACs) 22,617

Goshawk PACs 2,390

Great Gray Owl PACs 62

Furbearer (Fisher and Marten) Den Sites 3,072

California Spotted Owl Home Range Core Areas (HRCAs) 44,408

The following figure shows the relationship between land allocations from the 2001 SNFPA. It demonstrates how

managers would prioritize standards and guidelines when allocations overlap.(12)

12 For example, where the critical aquatic refuge (CAR), riparian conservation area (RCA), and willow flycatcher habitat

allocations overlay other land allocations, the most restrictive set of standards and guidelines is followed. These three

land allocations are dynamic.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

41

Land Allocations and Management Areas
Figure 2 Trumping Order for Land Allocations from the 2001 SNFPA

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

42

Land Allocations and Management Areas
The following table further illustrates what management direction would be followed where land allocations or

management areas overlap. Where there is an overlap, the table indicates which area's direction applies. Land

allocations with standards and guidelines that protect special habitats or protected species have a higher priority

than land allocations or management areasthat allow more active management. For example,standards and guidelines

for California spotted owl protected activity centers (PACs) protect owl habitat and breeding by limiting the types

and intensities of fuel treatments within their boundaries. Therefore, where PACs overlap old forest emphasis areas,

the standards and guidelines for the PACs take precedence over those for old forest emphasis areas (in which some

mechanical fuel treatments are permitted). Standards and guidelines for designated Wilderness and backcountry

(inventoried roadless areas) supersede all those for other land allocations.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

43

Land Allocations and Management Areas
Table 3 Dominant Management Direction When Land Allocations/Management Areas Overlap

Tribal Fuel

Emphasis

Treatment

Area

(TFETA)

Sequoia Groves(administrative

boundary)(1)

Protected

Activity

Centers

(PACs), Den

Sites, Home

Range Core

Areas

(HRCAs)

General

Monument

Riparian

Conservation

Areas

(RCA)and

Critical

Aquatic

Refuges

(CARs)

Wildland

Urban

Intermix

(WUI):

Threat

Zone

Wildland

Urban

Intermix

(WUI):

Defense

Zone

Old

Forest

Emphasis

Southern

Sierra Fisher

Conservation

Area

(SSFCA)

Land

Allocations/

Management

Areas on BOTH

axes

Apply gen.forest plusSSFCAspecific

Apply grove Apply

PAC,

den

& HRCA

Apply gen.forest plusSSFCAspecific

Apply both Apply

SSFCAexcept WUIfuels

ApplySSFCAexceptWUI fuels

Apply oldforest

N/A Southern Sierra

FisherConservationArea

Apply oldforest

Apply grove Apply

PAC,

den

& HRCA

N/A Apply both Apply old

forestemphexcept WUIfuels

Apply oldforestemphexceptWUI fuels

N/A Apply old

forest

Old ForestEmphasis

ApplySSFCAexcept WUIfuels

Apply WUI Apply

special(2)

PAC

& den

Apply WUI Apply both N/A N/A Apply old

forestemphexceptWUI fuels

ApplySSFCAexcept WUIfuels

Wildland UrbanIntermix (WUI):Defense Zone

ApplySSFCAexcept WUIfuels

Apply WUI Apply

PAC

&

den,WUI usuallyapply overHRCA

Apply WUI Apply both N/A N/A Apply old

forestemphexceptWUI fuels

ApplySSFCAexcept WUIfuels

Wildland UrbanIntermix (WUI):Threat Zone

Apply both Apply both Apply both,

except wherePACs, dens,and HRCAs aremore restrictive

Apply both N/A Apply both Apply both Apply

both

Apply both Riparian

ConservationAreas (RCA)and CriticalAquatic Refuges(CAR)

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

44

Land Allocations and Management Areas
Tribal Fuel

Emphasis

Treatment

Area

(TFETA)

Sequoia Groves(administrative

boundary)(1)

Protected

Activity

Centers

(PACs), Den

Sites, Home

Range Core

Areas

(HRCAs)

General

Monument

Riparian

Conservation

Areas

(RCA)and

Critical

Aquatic

Refuges

(CARs)

Wildland

Urban

Intermix

(WUI):

Threat

Zone

Wildland

Urban

Intermix

(WUI):

Defense

Zone

Old

Forest

Emphasis

Southern

Sierra Fisher

Conservation

Area

(SSFCA)

Land

Allocations/

Management

Areas on BOTH

axes

Apply gen.forest plusSSFCAspecific

Apply grove Apply

PAC,

den

& HRCA

N/A Apply both Apply WUI Apply

WUI

N/A Apply gen.

forest plusSSFCAspecific

GeneralMonument

Apply

PAC

& den,

Apply

PAC, den

& HRCA

N/A Apply

PAC,

den,

&

HRCA

Apply both,except wherePACs, dens,

Apply

PAC

& den,WUIusuallyapply overHRCA

Applyspecial (3)PAC

& den

ApplyPAC, den,& HRCA

Apply

PAC,

den,

& HRCA

ProtectedActivity Centers(PACs), DenSites, HomeRange CoreAreas (HRCAs)

WUI usuallyapply overHRCA

and HRCAsare morerestrictive

Apply grove N/A Apply

PAC,

den

& HRCA

Applygrove

Apply both Apply WUI Apply

WUI

Applygrove

Apply grove Sequoia Groves

(administrativeboundary)(4)

N/A Apply grove Apply

PAC

&

den,

Apply gen.forest plus 2SSFCAspecific

Apply both Apply

SSFCAexcept WUIfuels

ApplySSFCAexceptWUI fuels

Apply oldforest

Apply gen.forest plus 2SSFCAspecific

Tribal FuelEmphasisTreatment Area(TFETA) WUI usually

apply overHRCA

1. Recommended in MSA and formalized by Bush proclamation.2. See standards and guidelines for

PACs and den sites located in defense zones

3. See standards and guidelines for

PACs and den sites located in defense zones

4. Recommended in MSA and formalized by Bush proclamation.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

45

Land Allocations and Management Areas
The Monument Plan map packet contains three maps displaying land allocations and management areas. Map A

displays all the land allocations/management areas for the Monument; Map B shows all the land

allocations/management areas for wildlife; and Map C displays the WUI and the tribal fuels emphasis treatment

area (TFETA). Recreation and scenery management areas are delineated on maps to support broad administrative

management, but do not constitute land allocations. Examples of this type of mapped information are Maps 1 and

2, which display the recreation niche settings for the Monument.

Comments: 30

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

46

Land Allocations and Management Areas
National Forest System lands are generally available for a variety of multiple uses, although not all uses are suitable

for all areas. Section 6 (g) of the Resource Planning Act of 1974 (RPA), as amended by the National Forest

Management Act of 1976 (NFMA), requires "the identification of the suitability of landsfor resource management"

(RPA 1974, pp. 4-9).

The definition of suitability is:

The appropriateness of applying certain resource management practices to a particular area of land, as

determined by an analysis of economic and environmental consequences and the alternative uses forgone.

A unit of land may be suitable for a variety of individual or combined management practices (36 CFR 219.3)

The Sequoia National Forest, as the administrator of the Monument, has identified generally suitable uses for the

Monument as guided by current management direction and the Proclamation. The Proclamation makes specific

statements about the suitability of the Monument for certain resource-related activities, such as:

These giant sequoia groves and the surrounding forest provide an excellent opportunity to understand the

consequences of different approaches to forest restoration. These forests need restoration to counteract the

effects of a century of fire suppression and logging. Fire suppression has caused forests to become denser in

many areas, with increased dominance of shade-tolerant species. Woody debris has accumulated, causing an

unprecedented buildup of surface fuels. One of the most immediate consequences of these changes is an

increased hazard of wildfires of a severity that wasrarely encountered in pre-Euroamerican times. Outstanding

opportunities exist for studying the consequences of different approaches to mitigating these conditions and

restoring natural forest resilience (Clinton 2000, pp. 24095-24096).

All federal lands and interests in lands within the boundaries of this Monument are hereby appropriated and

withdrawn from entry, location, selection, sale, leasing, or other disposition under the public land laws

including, but not limited to, withdrawal from locating, entry, and patent under the mining laws and from

disposition under all laws relating to mineral and geothermal leasing, other than by exchange that furthers the

protective purposes of the monument (Clinton 2000, p. 24097).

No portion of the monumentshall be considered to be suited for timber production, and no part of the monument

shall be used in a calculation or provision of a sustained yield of timber from the Sequoia National Forest

(Clinton 2000, p. 24097).

The plan will provide for and encourage continued public and recreational access and use consistent with the

purposes of the monument (Clinton 2000, p. 24097).

For the purposes of protecting the objects included in the monument, motorized vehicle use will be permitted

only on designated roads, and non-motorized mechanized vehicle use will be permitted only on designated

roads and trails, except for emergency or authorized administrative purposes or to provide access for persons

with disabilities (Clinton 2000, p. 24098).

Thissection describes general land use suitability and provides guidance for making decisions about future proposed

projects and activities, but does not constitute a commitment or a decision to approve any particular projects or

activities.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

47

Suitable Land Uses
The following tables display the suitability of specific land uses or activities in both static and overlapping land

allocations and management areas. Suitability is expressed as suitable, not suitable, designated areas (existing uses

and areas only), regulated by the state (California Department of Fish and Game [CDF&G]),suitable unless otherwise

restricted, suitable for authorized use, or by exception. "By exception" means the use or activity is not generally

compatible with that land allocation or management area, but it may be appropriate under certain circumstances,

such as the collection of culturally important special forest products in the backcountry at a certain time of year.

NEPA analysesforsite-specific projects may need to be conducted to determine specific instances where exceptions

are warranted.

Land allocations and management areas are described and discussed in the Land Allocations section of Part 2 of

this plan. For the dynamic land allocations (not included in these tables), suitability will be addressed with standards

and guidelines developed for those allocations. A complete list of the standards and guidelines by resource area is

available in Appendix F.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

48

Suitable Land Uses
Table 4 Suitable Land Uses and Activities by Static Land Allocation or Management Area

Static Land Allocations/Management Areas Land Use or Activity

Southern

Sierra

Fisher

Conservation

Area

Giant

Sequoia

Groves

Botanical

Areas,

Geological

Area

Research

Natural

Areas

General

Monument

Old Forest

Emphasis

Backcountry

Wild and

Scenic

Rivers

Wilderness

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Prescribed fireSuitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Managed wildfireSuitable (3) Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable By

exception

Byexception (2)

Hand treatments for fuelsreduction (1)

Suitable Suitable Suitable By

exception

Suitable Suitable By exception By

exception

Not suitable Mechanical treatmentsfor

fuels reduction (4)

Suitable Suitable Suitable By

exception

Suitable Suitable By exception By

exception

Not suitable Removal of cut trees (5)

Suitable Not suitable Suitable By

exception

Suitable Suitable By exception Suitable Not suitable New road construction

Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable By exception Suitable Not suitable Road reconstructionSuitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable

Trail construction orreconstruction

Suitable By

exception

Byexception

Byexception

Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable By

exception

Administrativefacilities(6)

Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Scientific study and

monitoringHUMAN USE

Suitable Designated

areas

Designatedareas

Not suitable Designated

areas

Designatedareas

Designatedareas (7)

Notsuitable

Not suitable Recreation residence

tracts

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

49

Suitable Land Uses
Static Land Allocations/Management Areas Land Use or Activity

Southern

Sierra

Fisher

Conservation

Area

Giant

Sequoia

Groves

Botanical

Areas,

Geological

Area

Research

Natural

Areas

General

Monument

Old Forest

Emphasis

Backcountry

Wild and

Scenic

Rivers

Wilderness

Suitable Designated

areas

Designatedareas

Not suitable Designated

areas

Designatedareas

Designatedareas

Notsuitable

Not suitable Organizational camps

Suitable Not suitable Designated

areas

Not suitable Designated

areas

Designatedareas

Designatedareas

Notsuitable

Not suitable Lodges and resorts

Suitable Suitable Suitable Not suitable Designated

areas

Designatedareas

Designatedareas

Notsuitable

Not suitable Developed recreation

sites

Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Dispersed recreation sitesRegulatedby the state(CDF&G)

Regulatedby the state(CDF&G)

Regulatedby the state(CDF&G)

Regulatedby the state(CDF&G)

Regulatedby the state(CDF&G)

Regulatedby the state(CDF&G)

Regulated bythe state(CDF&G)

Regulatedby thestate(CDF&G)

Regulatedby the state(CDF&G)

Hunting and fishing

Designatedroads only

Designatedroads only

Designatedroads only

Designatedroads only

Designatedroads only

Designatedroads only

Designatedroads only

Designatedroads only

Not suitable Motorized use of roads

Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable Not

suitable

Not suitable Motorized use of trails

Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable Not

suitable

Not suitable Motorized or mechanized

cross country travel

Suitableunless

Suitableunless

Suitableunless

Suitableunless

Suitableunless

Suitableunless

Suitable unlessotherwiserestricted

Suitableunlessotherwiserestricted

Not suitable Non-motorized

mechanized vehicle useof roads and trails otherwise

restricted

otherwiserestricted

otherwiserestricted

otherwiserestricted

otherwiserestricted

otherwiserestricted

Suitableunless

Suitableunless

Suitableunless

Suitableunless

Suitableunless

Suitableunless

Suitable unlessotherwiserestricted

Suitableunlessotherwiserestricted

Suitableunlessotherwiserestricted

Temporary special uses(8)

otherwiserestricted

otherwiserestricted

otherwiserestricted

otherwiserestricted

otherwiserestricted

otherwiserestricted

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

50

Suitable Land Uses
Static Land Allocations/Management Areas Land Use or Activity

Southern

Sierra

Fisher

Conservation

Area

Giant

Sequoia

Groves

Botanical

Areas,

Geological

Area

Research

Natural

Areas

General

Monument

Old Forest

Emphasis

Backcountry

Wild and

Scenic

Rivers

Wilderness

COMMODITY AND COMMERCIAL USES

Designatedareas

Designatedareas

Designatedareas

Designatedareas

Designatedareas

Designatedareas

Designatedareas

Byexception

Designatedareas

Communication sites

Designatedareas

Designatedareas

Not suitable Designated

areas

Designatedareas

Designatedareas

Designatedareas

Byexception

Designatedareas

Utility corridors

Suitable Designated

areas

Suitable Not suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Suitable Livestock grazing

Suitable forauthorizeduse

Byexception

Byexception

Not suitable Suitable for

authorizeduse

Suitable forauthorizeduse

By exception Suitable

forauthorizeduse

Not suitable

Wood products(firewood)

Suitable forauthorizeduse

Byexception

Byexception

Not suitable Suitable for

authorizeduse

Suitable forauthorizeduse

By exception Suitable

forauthorizeduse

Not suitable Special forest products

Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable Not

suitable

Not suitable Minerals exploration and

development

1. Includes the use of chainsaws, handsaws, axes, and loppers.2. Activity or use is not generally compatible with the land allocation, but may be appropriate under certain circumstances.3. As allowed in 2001 SNFPA standards and guidelines.4. Includes the use of mechanized equipment.5. Only where clearly needed for ecological restoration and maintenance or public safety.6. Including trailheads, day use areas, lookouts, and district offices.7. Existing uses and areas only.8. Includes weddings, fishing events, historical reenactments, other recreational events.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

51

Suitable Land Uses
Table 5 Suitable Land Uses and Activities by Overlapping Land Allocation or Management Area

Land Use or Activity Overlapping Land Allocations/Management Areas

Tribal Fuels Emphasis

Treatment Area

Wildland Urban Intermix:

Threat Zone

Wildland Urban Intermix:

Defense Zone

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Prescribed fire Suitable Suitable Suitable

Managed wildfire By exception By exception Suitable

Hand treatmentsfor fuels Suitable Suitable Suitable

reduction (1)

Mechanical treatmentsfor Suitable Suitable Suitable

fuels reduction (2)(3)

Removal of cut trees Suitable Suitable Suitable (4)

New road construction Suitable Suitable Suitable

Road reconstruction Suitable Suitable Suitable

Trail construction or Suitable Suitable Suitable

reconstruction

Administrative Suitable Suitable Suitable

facilities(5)

Scientific Study and Suitable Suitable Suitable

Monitoring

HUMAN USE

Designated areas Designated areas Designated areas (6) Recreation residence

tracts

Organizational camps Designated areas Designated areas Designated areas

Lodges and resorts Designated areas Designated areas Designated areas

Developed recreation Designated areas Designated areas Designated areas

sites

Suitable unless otherwise

restricted

Suitable unless otherwise

restricted

Suitable unless otherwise

restricted

Dispersed recreation sites

Regulated by the state

(CDF&G)

Regulated by the state

(CDF&G)

Regulated by the state

(CDF&G)

Hunting and fishing

Motorized use of roads Designated roads only Designated roads only Designated roads only

Motorized use of trails Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable

Motorized or mechanized Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable

cross country travel

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

52

Suitable Land Uses
Land Use or Activity Overlapping Land Allocations/Management Areas

Tribal Fuels Emphasis

Treatment Area

Wildland Urban Intermix:

Threat Zone

Wildland Urban Intermix:

Defense Zone

Non-motorized Suitable Suitable Suitable

mechanized vehicle use

of roads and trails

Temporary special uses Suitable Suitable Suitable

(7)

COMMODITY AND COMMERCIAL USES

Communication sites Suitable Suitable Suitable

Utility corridors Suitable Suitable Suitable

Livestock grazing Suitable Suitable Suitable

Wood products Suitable Suitable Suitable

(firewood)

Special forest products Suitable Suitable Suitable

Minerals exploration and Not suitable Not suitable Not suitable

development

1. Includes the use of chainsaws, handsaws, axes, and loppers.

2. Includes the use of mechanized equipment.

3. Only where clearly needed for ecological restoration and maintenance or public safety.

4. Only where clearly needed for ecological restoration and maintenance or public safety.

5. Including trailheads, day use areas, lookouts, and district offices.

6. Existing uses and areas only.

7. Includes weddings, fishing events, historical reenactments, other recreational events.

Comments: 31

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

53

Suitable Land Uses
This part of the Monument Plan setsforth strategies and objectivesfor achieving or maintaining the desired conditions

for the Monument, as established in Part 1. Strategies describe the general approach that the responsible official

would use to achieve the desired conditions for each resource. Strategies establish priorities in management efforts

and convey a sense of priority and focus for objectives.

Objectives exist for some, but not all, resource areas. They are concise projections of measurable, time-specific

outcomes intended to be consistent with the strategies. They provide a way to measure progress toward achieving

or maintaining desired conditions. When a time frame has been provided for meeting an objective, the intent is to

meet the objective within that time frame, or as soon as reasonably possible thereafter.

Strategies and Objectives

In response to the Proclamation, the management strategies and objectives are focused on the resource areas that

would be affected by an amendment or other alterations of the current direction provided in the Forest Plan, as

amended by the KRSMA, the 2001 SNFPA, and the 2007 SNF MIS. These resource areas are:

Scientific Study and Adaptive Management

Vegetation, including Giant Sequoias

Fire and Fuels

Air Quality

Wildlife and Plant Habitat (including Management Indicator Species; Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive

Species; Invasive Nonnative Species; Rare and Endemic Species; and Botanical Resources)

Range

Hydrological Resources

Groundwater

Geological Resources

Paleontological Resources

Soils

Human Use (including Recreation, Scenery, and Socioeconomic)

Cultural Resources

Transportation System

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

54

Strategies and Objectives
Scientific Study and Adaptive Management

Figure 3 Overview of Adaptive Management Based on Scientific Study and Monitoring

Table 6 Strategies for Scientific Study and Adaptive Management

Strategy

Propose scientific study and management activities that respond to the advice provided in the science advisories,

where applicable and practicable. Use the joint strategic framework, "A Strategic Framework for Science in

Support of Management in the Southern Sierra Nevada Ecoregion," developed with the National Park Service,

to incorporate current and new science. Conduct research to assist in defining agents of change, ecosystem

elements of particular interest, and management tools that can promote resilient and adaptable forest ecosystems.

Develop adaptive management strategies to focus on relevant resource management factors linked to climate

change. Foster partnerships dealing with science.

Conduct research regarding objects of interest, including paleontological, cultural, and geological resources, for

which there is little current science available. Also conduct social science and recreation research to better

understand connection to place (including objects of interest), levels of acceptable changes, and future use trends.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

55

Strategies and Objectives
Objectives

1. Within 5 years,(13) develop at least two scientific studies in the groves to research resilience to agents of

change such as fire, drought, insects, disease, and climate change. Design experiments to investigate the

responses, including regeneration, of giant sequoias to changes in temperature and moisture, and the complex

interactions of these two factors. Publish results within 10 years of study initiation.

2. Continue and expand research on the effects of management activities on fishers and their habitat to better

understand how these activities influence individuals, important habitat components, prey resources, and

competition with other predators. After 5 years, evaluate the research findings and refine management direction.

3. Within 5 years, analyze landscapes (6th-field watershed scale) to identify opportunities for site-specific

projects.

Comments: 32

Vegetation, Including Giant Sequoias

Table 7 Strategies Specific to Giant Sequoia Groves Picture 22 The Boole Tree

Strategy

As part of the giant sequoia grove-specific fuel load reduction plan,

emphasize the protection of large giant sequoia trees and trees of other

species, including pines, red firs, incense cedars, and black oaks.

Protect naturally-occurring isolated giant sequoias located outside of

grove administrative boundaries from vegetation management activities,

giving special consideration to the root systems. Make every reasonable

effort to protect these trees from road construction. When practical,

preserve them within wildlife clumps or within areas reserved to meet

seral stage diversity requirements.

Protect only the named sequoias--Boole, President Bush, and Chicago

Stump(1)--from fuels reduction activities, wildfires, and from human

disturbance that can damage tree health, such as peeling bark and

trampling on roots. Protect these specific trees by pulling fuels away from

the base of the trees or removing ladder fuels that could promote a crown

fire in them.

13 The work toward achieving the objectives in this draft EIS will begin upon plan implementation. When a time frame

has been provided for meeting an objective, the intent is to meet the objective within that time frame, or as soon as

reasonably possible thereafter.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

56

Strategies and Objectives
Strategy

Give the designation of "grove" to any detached naturally occurring group

(10 or more giant sequoia trees, with at least 4 trees with a dbh of 3 feet

or larger) located outside an existing grove's administrative boundary.

Develop a zone of influence (ZOI) where mechanical treatments are

restricted. If previously unknown giant sequoia trees of any size and

number are discovered outside of a grove's administrative boundary,

modify the boundary according to the standards and guidelines.

1. These are the only recognized named giant sequoias within the Monument.

Table 8 Strategies for Climate Change/Carbon Sequestration

Strategy

Design forest management techniques to promote ecosystem resilience to future regional changes in temperature

and precipitation. Include adaptive managementstrategiesto forestall effectsto high value resources(i.e., retention

of named giant sequoia trees), to improve the potential for forest ecosystems to return to desired conditions

following natural perturbations (such as fire-enhanced giant sequoia regeneration), and to facilitate ecological

transitions to new and novel conditions (Millar et al. 2007, Ecological Applications 17: 2145-2151).

Provide mitigation measures for reducing overall greenhouse gas emissions and for sequestering carbon for

project-level activities.

Focus a portion of annual vegetation management activities in areas most likely to show the effects of climate

change (for example, riparian areas, vegetation transition zones), in order to manage the Monument for ecological

restoration and protect the objects of interest.

Sequester carbon and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, while at the same time reducing carbon accumulations,

in periodically unstable forest ecosystems by using fire and mechanical treatments, in combination.

Table 9 Strategies for Ecological Restoration

Strategy

Accomplish ecological restoration,(1) in part, through the reduction of fuels by decreasing down woody material,

ladder fuels, and brush.

Integrate ecological restoration with fuels treatment, giving priority to areas that are most in need. Prioritize

ecological restoration to improve the resilience of ecosystems in the Monument so they can adapt to natural

change agents such as fire and climate change, ensuring the protection of the objects of interest.

In young stands such as plantations, encourage more diversity in species and age, focusing on heterogeneity.

Reduce stocking and vary spacing of trees to encourage stand health and resilience.

After a major disturbance,(2) conduct and evaluate ground inventoriesin affected areas of the Monument to assess

changes in species composition and fuel loading.

1. There are additional strategies for ecological restoration in the other resource areas, such as Hydrological Resources.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

57

Strategies and Objectives
2. Such as a bark beetle infestation or large stand-replacing fire.

Table 10 Strategy for Tree Species Regeneration

Strategy

Encourage natural regeneration of tree species. In areas where natural regeneration is not likely, use planting as

determined in site-specific project analysis.

Table 11 Strategies for Biomass Removal

Strategy

For the removal of biomass (which includes trees), minimize the costs with the potential for cost recovery.

Where vegetation treatments are proposed, evaluate site-specific conditions, including site capability,

(1) to

determine if they are clearly needed for ecological restoration and maintenance or public safety.

Determine when trees clearly need to be removed from the Monument for ecological restoration and maintenance

or public safety, using the following criteria:

1. If keeping a tree on site would cause unacceptable fuels accumulation, because existing fuel loads are too

great to use treatments that would leave the biomass on site (such as chipping or mastication);

2. If keeping a tree on site would provide a vector for insect or disease infestations at levels higher than currently

known endemic levels; and/or

3. If keeping a tree on site would create a public safety hazard or attractive nuisance (for example, down trees

can be attractive to a child for climbing, creating the potential for falls and injuries).

1. Site capability includes an ecological classification, which can include productivity potential of the site, abundance of

species, height of stand, and the site’s ability to support certain species.

Table 12 Strategy for Pest Management

Strategy

Continue using integrated pest management. This management approach reducesthe risk from pests and prevents

unacceptable levels of pest damage by the most economical means available, while posing the least possible risk

to people, property, resources, and the environment.

Objectives

Vegetation and fuels management focuses on the first two decades of time for ecological restoration, tree and stand

resiliency, and the reduction of surface and ladder fuels.

Giant Sequoia Groves

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

58

Strategies and Objectives
1. Within 5 years, complete a giant sequoia grove-specific fuel load reduction plan for every grove within the

Monument.

Mixed Conifer

1. Within 5 years, manage vegetation to change 1.1 percent, or approximately 257 acres, of the mixed conifer

types to an early seral phase in giant sequoia groves.

2. Within 5 years, manage vegetation to change 0.5 percent, approximately 530 acres, of the mixed conifer types

to an early seral phase outside of groves.

3. Within 5 years, manage fire and thinning treatments on 11.3 percent, approximately 2,575 acres, of the mixed

conifer types to reduce fuels and increase tree growing space in groves.

4. Within 5 years, manage fire and thinning treatments on 11.3 percent, approximately 13,245 acres, of the mixed

conifer types to reduce fuels and increase tree growing space outside of groves.

Blue Oak-Interior Live Oak

1. For the life of the plan, keep the total acres of the blue oak vegetation type stable.

Chaparral-Live Oak

1. Within 5 years, manage vegetation to change 12.5 percent, approximately 20 acres, of the chaparral vegetation

types to an early seral phase in giant sequoia groves.

2. Within 5 years, manage vegetation to change 3.1 percent, approximately 53 acres, of the chaparral vegetation

types to an early seral phase outside of groves.

Montane Hardwood-Conifer

1. Within 5 years, manage vegetation to change 1.8 percent, approximately 45 acres, of the montane

hardwood-conifer vegetation types to an early seral phase in giant sequoia groves.

2. Within 5 years, manage vegetation to change 0.9 percent, approximately 720 acres, of the montane

hardwood-conifer types to an early seral phase outside of groves.

3. Within 5 years, manage fire and thinning treatments on 22.5 percent, approximately 574 acres, of the montane

hardwood-conifer types to reduce fuels and increase tree growing space in groves.

4. Within 5 years, manage fire and thinning treatments on 11.3 percent, approximately 9,004 acres, of the montane

hardwood-conifer types to reduce fuels and increase tree growing space outside of groves.

Red Fir

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

59

Strategies and Objectives
1. Within 5 years, manage vegetation to change 2.5 percent, approximately 25 acres, of the red fir vegetation

types to an early seral phase in giant sequoia groves.

2. Within 5 years, manage vegetation to change 0.5 percent, approximately 195 acres, of the red fir types to an

early seral phase outside of groves.

3. Within 5 years, manage fire and thinning treatments on 22.5 percent, approximately 228 acres, of the red fir

types to reduce fuels and increase tree growing space in groves.

4. Within 5 years, manage fire and thinning treatments on 11.3 percent, approximately 4,384 acres, of the red

fir types to reduce fuels and increase tree growing space outside of groves.

Comments: 33

Fire and Fuels

Table 13 Strategies for Fire and Fuels

Strategy

Follow the Guidance for Implementation of Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy (February 13, 2009).

Focus fire prevention programs on recreation use and residential areas.

When the use of fire is not appropriate (poor air quality days) or desirable (an abundance of ladder fuels that pose

a threat to public safety or adjacent communities), mechanical(1) treatments can be used to accomplish fuel

management objectives.(2)

Use mechanical means for the protection of individual trees (such as black oaks), when the use of fire could

threaten the individual tree targeted for protection.

Manage some hot fires with high intensity on a limited basis and with a tolerance for relatively high mortality.

Continue to allow this, as specified in landscape analysis, to reduce fuels or to improve the diversity of vegetation

and habitat characteristics in the Monument.

For firesstarted by natural ignitions(lightning strikes), determine whether to allow them to burn on a case-by-case

basis.

Control or suppress naturally-ignited wildfires only under one or more of the following circumstances:

1. Smoke management requirements cannot be met;

2. Fire intensity reduces the probability of protecting people (public or employees);

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

60

Strategies and Objectives
Strategy

3. Fire intensity reduces the probability of feasibly protecting adjacent land, infrastructure, named sequoias,

susceptible cultural resources, or critical natural resources (such as posing risks to critical habitat features,

or occurrence during critical nesting/denning periods);

4. Vegetation type conversion of 1,000 contiguous acres or more could not be prevented; and/or

5. Personnel and other resources to monitor or otherwise manage the fire are unavailable.

Avoid aerial application of retardant or foam within 300 feet of waterways. This does not require the helicopter

or air tanker pilot in command to fly in such a way as to endanger his or her aircraft, other aircraft, or structures,

or compromise ground personnel safety.

1. Mechanical treatment is the use of self-propelled equipment.

2. In some instances, mechanical treatments are restricted to the WUI defense zone only.

Table 14 Strategies for Fuels Reduction

Strategy

Manage fuels to produce a highly diverse vegetation mosaic of age classes, tree sizes, and species composition,

to protect the objects of interest, and to help maintain environmental, social, and economic benefits, such as those

associated with tourism.

Locate fuel treatments, whether they are a result of natural ignitions or prescribed fuel treatments, across broad

landscapesso that the spread and intensity of wildfire isreduced. Continue use of these treatmentsin the Monument

to protect life, property, and sensitive resourcessuch asthe giantsequoias, wildlife, cultural resources, and riparian

areas. Also use fuel treatments to help create openings for regeneration.

Locate the tribal fuels emphasis treatment area (TFETA) along the eastern boundary of the Tule River Indian

Reservation (see map below). Focusfuel treatmentsin the TFETA on protecting the reservation and its watersheds

from severe fire effects. The first priority for fuel reduction treatments in the TFETA is those areas within 1/4

mile of the reservation boundary or in the Long Canyon area.

Prioritization of fuel treatments (which may include an ecological restoration component) by land

allocations/management areas will be:(1)

1. WUI defense zones

2. TFETA areas of high and moderate fire susceptibility within 1/4-mile of the reservation boundary (see map

below)

3. WUI threat zone

4. Giant sequoia groves (not previously treated in 1 through 3)

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

61

Strategies and Objectives
Strategy

5. TFETA areas of high fire susceptibility (not previously treated in 2)

6. Old forest emphasis areas (not previously treated in 1 through 5)

1. This list applies to the land allocations/management areas present in each alternative. For example, the TFETA is only

proposed in Alternatives B, C, and F.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

62

Strategies and Objectives
Map 3 Tribal Fuels Emphasis Treatment Area

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

63

Strategies and Objectives
Table 15 Strategies Specific to WUI Management

Strategy

Allow more low to moderate intensity fires to burn in the Monument, including within giant sequoia groves.

Forest supervisors will provide for a 100-feet defensible space minimum (CFR Section 4291) for all structures

on administrative sites, structures authorized by permit, and for developments adjacent to National Forest System

lands.

Objective

1. Meet at least once annually with cooperating agencies to coordinate prescribed burning plans for projects

located on adjacent lands and to coordinate fire protection activities.

Comments: 34

Air Quality

Table 16 Strategies for Air Quality

Strategy

Avoid burning on high visitor use days.

Convey condition and trend information of sensitive resources to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

California Air Resources Board, and the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District for regulatory

consideration.

Use ambient air quality monitoring, in collaboration with research, to understand broad southern Sierra air pollution

trends and the contribution of smoke to the total pollution load.

Objective

1. As part of prescribed fire and managed wildfire, develop actionsthat minimize public exposure to atmospheric

pollutants.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

64

Strategies and Objectives
Comments: 35

Wildlife and Plant Habitat

Table 17 Strategies for Wildlife and Plant Habitat

Strategy

Maintain and improve habitat for endangered and threatened plant and animal species on federal and state lists

to meet objectives set forth in their recovery and management plans.

Protect, increase, and perpetuate old forest ecosystems and provide for the diversity of native plant and animal

species associated with old forest ecosystems.

Monitor and assess the effects of fuels management on Pacific fisher habitat, using models appropriate to the

scale of the project.

Use streamside management zones, the aquatic management strategy, and the riparian conservation objectives

for riparian conservation areas (RCAs) and critical aquatic refuges (CARs), to protect aquatic, riparian, and

meadow ecosystems.

Use limited operating periods appropriate for particular species as needed.

Manage California condor habitat following the most current U.S. Department of the Interior (USDI) Fish and

Wildlife Service California Condor Recovery Plan. Include the management of historic use areas, such as the

Starvation Grove historic nest site and the Lion Ridge roost area.

Use evaluation methods for species habitat from the 2007 SNF MIS on a site-specific project level basis.

Maintain species diversity within the Monument through the use of wildlife standards and guidelines.

Manage the Sierra Nevada red fox, pine marten, and fisher as sensitive species (MSA, pages 55-58), and monitor

to determine the effects of fuels management on their habitat.

Manage wetlands and meadow habitat for willow flycatchers and other species, following the standards and

guidelines from the Forest Plan, as modified by the MSA (MSA, pages 5-6, and Exhibit D).

Reduce, and where possible reverse, the spread of noxious weeds.

Objective

1. Within 3 years, complete a baseline inventory for invasive species within the Monument.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

65

Strategies and Objectives
Comments: 36

Range

Table 18 Strategies for Range

Strategy

Maintain or enhance the productivity of all forest ranges through adequate protection of the soil, water, and

vegetative resources.

Contribute to the stability of the ranching community by recognizing its value as part of our heritage, its contribution

of food and fiber, and its maintenance of open space.

Utilize management systems that ensure cost-effective management of suitable rangelands.

Comments: 37

Hydrological Resources

Table 19 Strategies for Hydrological Resources

Strategies(14)

Restore ecological processes ofstreams, meadows, wetlands, and otherspecial aquatic features wherever possible.

Retain water on site so that riparian and wetland areas within the Monument can provide for favorable conditions

of water flows for longer duration.

Maintain sustainable riparian conditions for giant sequoia ecosystems.

Manage stream channels to maintain riparian vegetation, transport sediment, and ensure streambank stability.

Create a network of long-term monitoring sites within watersheds to determine the current state of riparian and

wetland resources and habitat conditions.

Determine streambank erosion rates to define baseline conditions and determine if management activities have

resulted in change.

Determine channel geometry and discharge relationshipsto define baseline conditions and determine if management

activities have resulted in change.

Ensure a renewable supply of down logs that can reach the stream channel and provide habitat in riparian areas.

14 Strategies that specifically address stream management zones, riparian conservation areas, and critical aquatic refuges

are found in the Wildlife and Plant Habitat section.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

66

Strategies and Objectives
Strategies(14)

Ensure riparian conservation areas and the critical aquatic refuge (Mill Creek) are managed for species dependent

on those areas, while reducing the risks associated with wildfires and allowing for ecological restoration.

Table 20 Strategies for Meadow Restoration

Strategy

Maintain and restore the hydrologic connectivity of meadows by identifying those at risk. Implement corrective

actions where necessary to restore connectivity of meadows to their floodplain.

Assessthe hydrologic function of at-risk meadow habitats. Ensure that characteristics are, at a minimum, at proper

functioning condition (PFC) as defined in the Process for Assessing PFC for Lentic Riparian-Wetland Areas,

USDI TR 1737-16 (1999).

Perform a stream condition inventory (SCI) if necessary, instead of using PFC, to validate an existing PFC

determination or existing meadow condition.

Perform an SCI prior to meadow restoration and any ground-disturbing activity.

Perform a full hydrologic survey prior to restoration. Include a longitudinal profile and adequate cross-section

surveys to determine design parameters. At a minimum, determine meadow pattern, profile, and dimensions for

the impaired site and the design.

Require that projects are designed and reviewed by a qualified specialist prior to implementation. A qualified

specialist is one with training in river restoration and natural channel design.

Objectives

1. Within 5 years, inventory 5 percent of the perennial streams in 6th-field watersheds within the Monument to

determine existing condition.

2. Within 5 years, assess meadows for proper hydrologic connectivity and function.

3. Within 5 years, restore Indian Basin Meadow (Hume Lake Ranger District) to proper hydrologic connectivity

and function to enhance species habitat.

4. Within 5 years, restore Long Meadow, Last Chance Meadow, and Dry Meadow (Western Divide Ranger

District) to proper hydrologic connectivity and function to enhance species habitat.

14 Strategies that specifically address stream management zones, riparian conservation areas, and critical aquatic refuges

are found in the Wildlife and Plant Habitat section.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

67

Strategies and Objectives
Comments: 38

Groundwater

Table 21 Strategies for Groundwater

Strategy

Maintain the natural patterns of recharge and discharge and minimize disruption to groundwater levels that are

critical for wetland integrity.

Maintain favorable groundwater levels that provide base flows to maintain and enhance the condition of

water-dependent resources and their habitat.

Manage springs and their riparian areas as units.

Restore those groundwater-dependent ecosystems damaged by prior land uses.

Objective

1. During evaluation of site-specific projects, determine the location, extent, depth, amount, flowpath, quality,

and recharge and discharge area of groundwater resources, and their hydrological connections with surface

water.

Comments: 39

Geological Resources

Table 22 Strategies for Geological Resources

Strategy

Identify areas where domes, spires, soda springs, and hot springs are located and can be used by recreationists,

while protecting and preserving these sites.

Enhance opportunities for interpretation and education, including brochures and signs, of geological resources

(cave ecosystems, domes, and spires).

Keep Church Cave and Boyden Cave open for public use under an appropriate permit system.

Identify and minimize potential geologic hazardsincluding flood hazards, landslide hazards, and naturally-occurring

asbestos (NOA) hazards within the Monument.

Objectives

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

68

Strategies and Objectives
1. In 5 years, complete an inventory of the known caves within the Monument to assess geologic features and

their hydrologic characteristics, safety hazards, biological, archaeological, and paleontological resources, to

make a determination of significance. Use this information to develop site-specific standards and guidelines

for cave management.

2. On an annual basis, evaluate the condition of Church Cave and Boyden Cave, ensuring gates are secured and

cave features are protected.

Comments: 40

Paleontological Resources

Table 23 Strategies for Paleontological Resources

Strategy

Retain areas of significant sedimentation and meadow vegetation deposits.

During cave inventories, conduct paleontological evaluations of any fossilized material found.

Determine whether any paleontological areas need to be proposed for designation as stated in Forest Service

Manual Section 2370.

Objective

1. Within 5 years, conduct a survey to identify the location and type of paleontological resourcesin the Monument,

focusing on areas most likely to contain these resources. Use survey data to evaluate risk factors to these

resources.

Comments: 41

Soils

Table 24 Strategies for Soils

Strategy

Maintain sufficient soil cover to prevent accelerated soil erosion from exceeding the rate of soil formation.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

69

Strategies and Objectives
Strategy

In site-specific analysis, prescribe the kinds and amounts of soil cover (organic matter) that would not elevate

wildfire risk or severity to the point that fuel management and soil quality objectives (nutrient cycling) cannot

be met. If there is no viable alternative for providing soil cover without elevating the risk of adverse wildfire

effects, prescribe the minimum soil cover needed to avoid detrimental soil loss.

Maintain soil porosity to decrease detrimental soil compaction.

Maintain organic matter sufficient to prevent significant short or long-term nutrient cycle deficits, and to avoid

detrimental physical and biological soil conditions.

Use appropriate mitigation measures if decreased nutrient supply has the potential to affect ecosystem health,

diversity, or productivity.

Comments: 42

Human Use

Table 25 Strategies for Human Use

Strategy

Continue to provide visitors with opportunities to recreate in a variety of settings, from primitive to highly

developed areas.

Manage for new developed recreation facilities as visitor use increases.

Use the Monument recreation niche settings in accordance with current recreation management direction: Rivers

and Lakes, Scenic Routes, Great Western Divide, Lloyd Meadow, Hume High Elevation, Wildlands, Front

Country, and Kings River Special Management Area OHV.

Maintain the assigned ROS classes (semi-primitive non-motorized, semi-primitive motorized, roaded natural,

and rural).

Accommodate the increasing demand for more specialized and diverse recreation opportunities, in order to provide

flexibility to accommodate new and changing recreation activities as they emerge in the future.

Develop and manage opportunities(1) for public enjoyment.

Balance diverse users and a wide variety of uses, accommodate use through all seasons, and minimize conflicts

among recreational users.

Maintain or create scenic vistas as necessary to meets the needs of the public and improve scenery in areas of

high public concern.

Provide for the protection of resources, ecological restoration, and the development ofstewardship under applicable

law and policy, so that people care about the land and its resources.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

70

Strategies and Objectives
Strategy

In accordance with the Sequoia National Forest Interpretive Plan and the Forest Service conservation education

guidance, provide opportunities for interpretation that reflect scientifically-supported scholarship and research

data.

1. Convey clear messages regarding natural and cultural resources and multiple use. Use multi-media

interpretation and educational programs to develop stewardship of resources, to ensure their present and

future protection, and to enhance public enjoyment of this unique place.

2. Promote and integrate awareness of Monument history, appreciation for biological processes, education

about past and current human use of the Monument, and education about the distinctive yet interrelated

disruptive forces involved with the use and protection of resources.

Emphasize existing management direction to provide for wide and varied public use of monument resources and

opportunities, while protecting sensitive resources and the objects of interest.

Emphasize diverse public access, partnerships, and place-based recreation opportunities, focusing on connection

to place and the recreation settings (Monument’s recreation niche).

Establish use fees that are compatible with cost and reduce public competition with the private sector.

Continue to support and participate in employment and training program for youths, older Americans, and the

disadvantaged, in response to national employment and training needs and opportunities existing in forest

surroundings.

Develop partnerships to provide a spectrum of recreation experiences through a variety of providers, including

the Forest Service, associations, non-government organizations, permit holders, volunteers, and other community

groups.

Support the efforts of the Giant Sequoia National Monument Association.

Develop partnerships to increase interpretive materials and programs that reach larger segments of the general

public and to foster stewardship.

Enhance opportunities to connect people to the land, especially those in urban areas and of diverse cultures

(connect people to place).

Work with gateway communities and communities within the Monument to help foster economic opportunities.

Develop bi-lingual(2) communication tools, including publications, information boards, and radio spots.

Encourage communities of color, focusing on youth, to increase involvement in environmental education programs

to educate and develop the citizen steward.

Designate and develop a Children’s Forest in the Monument to provide a place where youth and families can

participate in and explore forest-related projects. The criteria for the location of a Children's Forest include:

In or in close proximity to a giant sequoia grove

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

71

Strategies and Objectives
Strategy

Within 1/2 mile of a road

Close to an existing parking lot or a suitable area for one

Close to developed recreation facilities

Away from high use, congested areas

Close to water source

Year-round access

Does not conflict with existing uses (such as grazing)

1. Opportunities emphasized would depend on location and other criteria.

2. English-Spanish

Objectives

1. Within 5 years, actively engage communities of color in the central valley of California in management

planning and conservation education projects.

2. During project planning, develop partnerships for project implementation.

3. Within 5 years, explore the designation and development of a Children's Forest in the Monument.

Comments: 43

Communication with Communities of Color

The Sierra Nevada is the third fastest growing region in California. Some estimates predict the population will

triple by 2040. The area is experiencing rapid retiree and commuter resident growth, and large intermittent recreational

populations that increase resource pressures. For some time, the Sierra Nevada's economy has been diversifying

from primarily a resource-based economy to one increasingly dependent on tourism and related services;specialized

goods and services tied to the state economy; and health, financial, and other services needed by the growing

population. Many parts of the region face significant threatsfrom natural disaster, in particular the risk of catastrophic

fire. There is increasing conflict over various land use decisions in certain portions of the region and over regional

resource conservation strategies (Sierra Nevada Conservancy Revised Strategic Plan March 2009 - AKey Sierra

Nevada Fact).

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

72

Strategies and Objectives
Most visitors to national forests, in particular to locations like the Giant Sequoia National Monument, are more

likely to be white or Caucasian than any other ethnic or racial group. However, as the population increases in

California, in particular the Central Valley (Kern, Tulare, and Kern Counties), more people represent groups of

color (communities of color). There are a number of reasons for this disparity in use levels, including a lack of

information about outdoor recreational opportunities (Chavez et al. 2008). In the 2000 census, California was 47

percent non-Hispanic white and 32 percent Hispanic. Most of the central San Joaquin Valley had even higher

Hispanic percentages--about 38 percent in Kern County, 44 percent in Fresno, Kings and Madera counties, 45

percent in Merced County, and a majority of 51 percent in Tulare County. The continuing shift toward an increasingly

diverse society elevates the importance of ensuring that information is provided through means that are most

appropriate to each ethnic and racial group. The Monument will need to produce information, recreation sites, and

facilities for this increase in communities of color.

Research shows that communicating with a diverse public requires some variation in media sources to be used as

points of contact for reaching different ethnic groups. The heavy reliance on family and friends, particularly in the

Hispanic community, translates to the production of various communication tools.

Agency culture isseen as a barrier for multiple reasonsincluding the underrepresentation of non-whites as employees

delivering and managing recreation opportunities; communication and education methods that are a poor fit with

the needs and preferences of communities of color; planning for a “traditional white” visitor experience,;and a

general lack of feeling welcomed (Allison and Hibbler 2004, Roberts 2003, Tierney et al. 1998).

To cross a wide variety of communities of color and expand communication opportunities, the Monument will

implement the following strategies to communicate with communities of color:

1. Develop bi-lingual communication tools (publications, information boards, radio spots);

2. Establish personal contacts in the community who can be effective in disseminating information on recreation

opportunities;

3. Produce newspaper articles to print media, particularly in Spanish;

4. Establish partnerships with Hispanic Chambers of Commerce;

5. Involve and pro-actively encourage communities of color in youth environmental education programs to

educate and develop the citizen steward (e.g., MyForest Summit).

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

73

Strategies and Objectives
Comments: 44

Cultural Resources

Table 26 Strategies for Cultural Resources

Strategy

Recognize cultural resourcesthrough National Register of Historic Places nomination, National Historic Landmark

nomination, and other special designations as appropriate.

Provide opportunitiesfor public use and enjoyment of cultural resourcesthrough education and outreach programs

that promote restoration stewardship. Focus on the need to protect cultural resources while simultaneously making

them available to the public.

Provide for continued traditional use by Native American people and protect those places that are most important

to local Native American people in maintaining their traditional culture. Seek partnerships with tribes to develop

cultural education programs.

Emphasize managing cultural resources by systematically identifying, protecting, and sharing cultural resource

information throughout the Monument.

Provide protection from fires and from management activities associated with fuels management that would

damage cultural resources.

Interview key knowledgeable informants occasionally for project-specific information. Bring together and organize

archival resources according to forest archival policy.

Objective

1. Within 3 years, develop a Monument cultural resource management plan that includesidentification, evaluation,

and allocation of the resources to appropriate management categories. This plan will protect cultural resource

values while allowing for public enjoyment.

Comments: 45

Transportation System

Table 27 Strategies for Transportation System

Strategy

Size and maintain the road and trail system to limit impacts on resources and promote aquatic organism passage

where needed.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

74

Strategies and Objectives
Strategy

Convert to trails or decommission roads not needed to meet management objectives so that natural drainage

patterns are restored and natural vegetation will grow back over time.

Maintain roads with effective road drainage and erosion controls to conserve existing soil and reduce effects to

adjacent riparian and aquatic systems.

Complete 6th-field watershed analyses and review the transportation system in the Monument to determine the

future status of roads, including changes in status, decommissioning, or converting to trails.

Consult with local tribal governments and Native Americansto provide transportation and access needs, including

culturally important sites and resources for use by Native Americans.

Coordinate transportation planning, management, and road decommissioning with the Sequoia and Kings Canyon

National Parks; other federal, state, and county agencies; and the Tule River Indian Tribe, to reduce traffic

congestion and safety hazards, especially along major travelways.

Partner with state and local agencies to maintain roads for four-season use where appropriate.

Provide appropriate parking facilities.

Base proposals for new roads on the need to provide access to recreation opportunities, other public use, or

management activities, as appropriate.

Maintain administrative facilities consistent with wilderness values.

Rehabilitate, replace, or relocate existing buildings to support management of the Monument.

Maintain buildings to the minimum level to protect health and prevent building deterioration.

Objectives

1. Within 2 years, complete Subpart A of Travel Management for the Monument.

2. Within 2 years, complete a Monument-wide watershed improvement needs inventory (WINI) to identify

adverse impacts to watersheds from roads and trails.

3. Within 5 years, publish updated motor vehicle use maps (MVUMs) for the Monument ranger districts.

4. Within 10 years, establish a sustainable and desirable off-highway vehicle (OHV) route system (on the existing

road system) that reflects the updated MVUM, including loop opportunities where feasible and appropriate.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

75

Strategies and Objectives
Comments: 46

Special Areas

Table 28 Strategies for Special Areas

Strategy

Classify Slate Mountain as a botanical area and develop a management plan, pursuant to 36 CFR 294.1(a) and

the authority vested in the Regional Forester by the Chief of the Forest Service.

Continue coordination with the National Park Service in on-site landmark evaluation studiesfor Moses Mountain.

Protect and manage this candidate area as a national landmark until final resolution.

Objectives

1. Within five years, develop a management plan for the Moses Mountain Research Natural Area.

2. Within five years, prepare the establishment report for the South Mountaineer Creek area for submission to

the Chief, as recommended by the Regional Research Natural Areas Committee for final establishment.

Comments: 47

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

76

Strategies and Objectives
Designated Special Areas

Special areas are places on National Forest System lands identified or designated because of their unique or special

characteristics. These include wildernesses, wild and scenic river corridors, special management areas, research

natural areas, backcountry (inventoried roadless areas), botanical areas,scenic byways, and geological areas. Special

areas have their own sets of management direction.

Several congressionally designated areas are found entirely or partially within the Monument: the Monarch

Wilderness, the Golden Trout Wilderness, the Kings Wild and Scenic River, the South Fork Kings Wild and Scenic

River, the North Fork Kern Wild and Scenic River, and the Kings River Special Management Area. Within the

Monument, the Sequoia National Forest manages 13,294 acres of wilderness, 80,297acres of roadless areas, and

4,669 acres of Wild and Scenic River Corridor. The 24,288 acres of the Kings River Special Management Area in

the Monument are administered and managed by the Sierra National Forest.

Part or all of four giantsequoia groves are in the Monarch Wilderness and Agnew Roadless Area: Agnew, Monarch,

Deer Meadow, and Evans Complex. The Golden Trout Wilderness contains part or all of three other groves: Maggie

Mountain, Upper Tule, and Middle Tule.

Monarch Wilderness

8,762 acres of the Monarch Wilderness are in the Monument. The Monarch Wilderness was established by Congress

in the California Wilderness Act of 1984, created from the High Sierra Primitive Area and a portion of the Agnew

Roadless Area. Shared with the Sierra National Forest, it is located 70 miles east of Fresno, California. Between

November and April, the access road is closed because of snow. This is a scenically dramatic area rising from

elevations of 4,300 feet along the South Fork of the Kings River to 11,080 feet at Hogback Peak. The Monarch

Wilderness contains the only occurrence of white-bark pine in the Sequoia National Forest. Because of the steep,

rugged character of the area, trail access is extremely limited and use is very light.

Golden Trout Wilderness

4,532 acres of the Golden Trout Wilderness are in the Monument. The Golden Trout Wilderness was designated

by Congress in 1978. Shared with the Inyo National Forest, it gets its name from the brightly colored native trout

(California's state fish) and its subspecies, the Little Kern golden trout, a federally listed threatened species, as well

as the South Fork Kern golden trout. Elevations range from 4,700 feet at the Forks of the Kern River to 12,432 feet

on Mt. Florence, the highest peak in the Sequoia National Forest. The entire Little Kern River Drainage lies within

the Golden Trout Wilderness. The North Fork Kern and South Fork Kern Wild and Scenic Rivers bisect this

wilderness. Approximately 150 miles of trails are located in the Golden Trout Wilderness (mostly outside of the

Monument). Grey Meadow and Trout Meadows are located on this trail system and receive high use.

Kings Wild and Scenic River

All 5 miles of the Kings Wild and Scenic River lie along the northern boundary of the Monument. In 1987, Congress

designated this part of the Kings River, from the confluence of Middle Fork and South Fork Kings Rivers to Garlic

Meadow Creek, as the Kings Wild and Scenic River. The Kings River is one of the largest rivers flowing down the

western slopes of the Sierra Nevada and forms the boundary between the Sequoia and Sierra National Forests. The

river is wooded, with premium whitewater and several cataracts. The Kings River is a state wild trout stream.

Numerous Native American village sites and remnants of one of the longest logging flumes in the world are located

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

77

Special Areas
in this system. Other historic artifacts create an area of historic and cultural significance. Whitewater rafting is

popular in the lower reaches of the river corridor. The river flows through a wide canyon near Pine Flat. As the

river ascends toward the confluence with the Middle Fork - South Fork, the canyon becomes more narrow and

steep. Main ridges on both sides of the river are more than 500 feet in elevation above the river. The river exists in

a free-flowing state with numerous rapids. Access is limited above Garlic Falls.

South Fork Kings Wild and Scenic River

Approximately 12 miles of the South Fork Kings Wild and Scenic River lie along the northern boundary of the

Monument. In 1987, Congress designated 40.5 miles of the South Fork Kings River, from its headwaters in Kings

Canyon National Park to its confluence with Middle Fork and Main Kings Rivers, as the South Fork Kings Wild

and Scenic River. The headwaters are in the Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, above the timberline in a

heavily glaciated basin. The river flows through one of the deepest and most classic glacial canyons in the nation,

with several waterfalls and unique geological formations. The South Fork Kings River has complex floral diversity,

with several rare species. Numerous prehistoric sites and a significant cultural resource area exist on the river. The

state has designated the river as a Wild Trout Stream. Important peregrine falcon and golden eagle habitat exist in

the area.

North Fork Kern Wild and Scenic River

Approximately 14 miles of the North Fork Kern Wild and Scenic River lie along the eastern boundary of the

Monument. In 1987, Congress designated 78.5 miles of the North Fork Kern River, from its headwaters in Sequoia

National Park to the Kern-Tulare County line, as the North Fork Kern Wild and Scenic River. More than 21 miles

flow through wilderness, most of this section in a precipitous gorge, and only the lower 17 miles are accessible by

road. The section of the Kern River between Lake Isabella and the Johnsondale Bridge is commonly called the

Upperkern. Outstanding features for viewing include gray pines, scrub oaks, grass, and dry climate shrubs clinging

to steep canyon walls, while cottonwoods and willows line the river.

Kings River Special Management Area (KRSMA)

About 24,280 acres of the KRSMA (of approximately 48,000 total acres) are located within the northern portion

of the Monument, adjacent to the Kings River. This special management area was created by Public Law 100-150

in 1987 to provide for public outdoor recreation use and enjoyment; for protection of the natural, archaeological,

and scenic resources; and for fish and wildlife management. This public law permits off-highway vehicle (OHV)

use on trails to the same extent and in the same location as was permitted before enactment. This statute takes

precedence over the presidential proclamation (Clinton 2000) that created the Monument, which prohibits OHVs

from driving off designated roads. Therefore, within that portion of the special management area located within

the Monument, OHV use may still occur on the 3.8 miles of Trail 27E04.

Moses Mountain Research Natural Area

The Moses Mountain Research Natural Area covers approximately 960 acres. In addition to giant sequoias, the

area contains rare plant habitat on the rocky east-facing slopes of Moses Mountain, as well as aquatic habitat along

the Wishon Fork of the Tule River. Nearly two-thirds of the area lies within the Golden Trout Wilderness. Moses

Mountain is managed for the study of giant sequoias in a natural setting.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

78

Special Areas
Comments: 48

Other Special Areas

Backcountry (Inventoried Roadless Areas)

Roadless areasin the Sequoia National Forest were inventoried as part of the Roadless Area Review and Evaluation

(RARE II) process. The California Wilderness Act of 1984 specifically cited those areas that were adjacent to newly

created wilderness or adjacent to existing wilderness, and added them to the existing wilderness areas. The rest of

the roadless areas identified by the RARE II were released to non-wilderness management, were identified as being

non-wilderness or "further planning areas," and were evaluated in the land management planning process for the

Forest Plan.

The non-wilderness roadless areas within the Monument, as identified in the Forest Plan, are:

Table 29 Non-Wilderness Roadless Areas

Name Acres

Agnew 9,300

Jennie Lakes 3,200

Black Mountain 15,800

Slate Mountain 13,100

Lyon Ridge 5,200

Slate Mountain Botanical Area

Slate Mountain is unique because of its abundance of sensitive plants. This area was released by Congress for

non-wilderness use in the 1984 California Wilderness Act. The botanical area covers 490 acres along the rocky

northern summit comprised of pre-cretaceous metamorphic and metasedimentary rocks surrounded by granitic

rocks. Nearly 95 percent of the total population of Twisselmann's buckwheat occurs on Slate Mountain.

In accordance with the Forest Plan, Slate Mountain is classified and being managed as a botanical area.

Freeman Creek Botanical Area

The Freeman Creek Botanical Area contains the Freeman Creek Grove and covers approximately 1,425 acres. The

Freeman Creek Grove, also known as Lloyd Meadow Grove, is the easternmost grove of giant sequoias and is

considered to be among the most recently established. Part of the grove is underlain by a 3-million-year-old volcanic

basalt flow. This botanical area is fairly easy to reach by car throughout the summer. There are several noteworthy

sequoias to see in this grove, including the President George Bush Tree. This tree was named for President George

H.W. Bush when he signed a proclamation on July 14, 1992, to protect all the sequoia groves throughout the Sierra.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

79

Special Areas
This proclamation set aside giant sequoia groves in national forests for protection, preservation, and restoration. A

beautifully reconstructed trail provides a fully accessible loop around the Bush Tree. Freeman Creek Grove and its

surrounding watershed are newly designated and being managed as a botanical area.

Kings Canyon Scenic Byway

The National Scenic Byway Program showcases outstanding national forestscenery and increases public awareness

and understanding of all national forest activities. The Kings Canyon Scenic Byway, which is 50 miles long, is the

only national forest scenic byway in the Monument (and forest) and is an eligible state scenic highway. The scenic

byway nomination reportstatesthat thistravel corridor isinternationally significant with two extraordinary features:

towering giant sequoia trees and Kings Canyon (USDA Forest Service 1990).

South Mountaineer Creek Research Natural Area

The South Mountaineer Creek Research Natural Area covers 1,325 acres. An extensive red fir forest dominates the

area, which lies in the South Mountaineer Creek watershed in the Golden Trout Wilderness. South Mountaineer

Creek, though establishment is still pending, is being managed as a research natural area.

Windy Gulch Geological Area

The Windy Gulch Geologic Area contains a number of outstanding formations, including caves and marble roof

pendants. Mesozoic granitic rocks are the dominant rock type and consist of several plutons approximately 100

million years old. The metamorphic rocks are known as the Kings Terrain; the most extensive of these are the

Lower Kings River, Kaweah River, and Tule River roof pendants. The Lower Kings River roof pendant includes

the Boyden Cave roof pendant, whose marbles contain several caves including Boyden Cave and Church Cave.

Map 4 shows all the special areas in the Monument.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

80

Special Areas
Map 4 Special Areas in the Monument

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

81

Special Areas
Comments: 49

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

82

Special Areas
Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

83

Special Areas
Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan 84

Part 3-Design Criteria
Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

85

Legal and Regulatory Compliance
Part 3-Design Criteria

Design criteria include the legal and regulatory compliance, standards and guidelines, monitoring and evaluation

procedures, and adaptive management guidelines to develop and implement a scientific research strategy. Design

criteria are sideboards for subsequent projects and activities to help achieve the desired conditions and objectives.

Legal and Regulatory Compliance

The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) at 40 CFR 1502.25(a) directs “to the fullest extent possible,

agencies shall prepare draft environmental impact statements concurrently with and integrated with... other

environmental review laws and executive orders.” The Monument will be guided by applicable laws, regulations,

policies, and guidelines. This Monument Plan supplements, but does not replace, the direction from those sources.

The Monument is guided by direction from numerous sources. The governing source of legal direction is the

Proclamation (Clinton 2000); this section discusses other laws and executive orders. Laws passed by Congress

such as the NEPA, the National Forest Management Act of 1976 (NFMA), the Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act

of 1964 (MUSYA), and the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), provide direction for certain aspects of

management. At the national level, the Resources Planning Act of 1974 (RPA) program gives broad direction and

the Administrative Procedure Act of 1966 (APA) (P.L. 79-404) governs the way in which administrative agencies

of the federal government may propose and establish regulations.

Applicable laws, regulations, policies, and executive orders, as well as Forest Service manual and handbook

guidance, memoranda of understanding, conservation strategies, and programmatic agreements, are listed here by

resource. The relevant documents are available on the Forest Service website (http://www.fs.fed.us/publications/)

and from Forest Service offices. The list included here is not all inclusive.

Scientific Study and Adaptive Management

Forest Service Handbook (FSH) 1909.12-2006-5, Chapter 40 – Science and Sustainability: direction regarding

scientific review guidelines and procedures

Comments: 50

Vegetation, Including Giant Sequoia Groves

National Forest Management Act of 1976

National Forest Resource Management: Forest Service Manual (FSM) 2000 – Chapter 2020 – Ecological

Restoration and Resilience

Silvicultural Practices Handbook (FSH 2409.17), Silvicultural Examination and Prescription Handbook (FSH

2409.26d)

Timber Management: FSM 2400 – Silvicultural Practices Chapter

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

86

Legal and Regulatory Compliance
Comments: 51

Fire and Fuels

Guidance for Implementation of Federal Wildand Fire Management Policy, February 2009

FSM 5100

Comments: 52

Air Quality

Use the following guidance and direction for smoke management and air quality protection:

Federal Clean Air Act. The Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) is the federal law passed in 1963, and last amended

in 1990, (42 U.S.C. §7401 etseq.) which isthe basisfor national control of air pollution. Some of the principal

components, regulations, and policiesrelated to the Clean Air Act that may directly or indirectly affect planning

in the Monument are discussed below.

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). These are standards for pollutants considered harmful

to public health and the environment. The EPA has set the NAAQS for six principal pollutants, which are

called “criteria pollutants” (see Table III-2: National ambient air quality standards). Smoke contributes to

PM10 and to a lesser degree NO2, CO, and O3.

Class I areas. These include national parks, wildernesses, and some U.S. Fish and Wildlife refuges that were

in existence at the passage of the 1977 Clean Air Act amendments. These areas are provided special protection

from new and modified major stationary sources. Federal land managers are mandated an affirmative

responsibility to protect values that might be impacted by air pollution, including visibility and other air

quality-related values.

Regional Haze Rule. These regulationsrequire statesto review how pollution emissions within the state affect

visibility at class I areas across a broad region. These rules also require states to make “reasonable progress”

in reducing any effect this pollution has on visibility conditionsin classI areas and to prevent future impairment

of visibility. The states are required by the rule to analyze a pathway that takes the class I areas from current

conditions to “natural conditions” in 60 years. “Natural conditions” is a term used in the Clean Air Act that

means that no human-caused pollution can impair visibility. This program, while aimed at class I areas, will

improve regional visibility and air quality throughout the country.

Conformity Rule. This rule implements the Clean Air Act conformity provision, which mandates that the

federal government not engage,support, or provide financial assistance for licensing or permitting, or approve,

any activity not conforming to an approved state implementation plan.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

87

Legal and Regulatory Compliance
EPA Interim Policy on Wildland and Prescribed Fire. This EPA interim policy integrates two public policy

goals: (1) to allow fire to function, as nearly as possible, in its natural role in maintaining healthy wildland

ecosystems, and (2) to protect public health and welfare by mitigating the impacts of air pollutants on air

quality and visibility.

California Clean Air Act (H&S §§ 39660 et seq.). California adopted the California Clean Air Act (CCAA)

in 1988. The Act providesthe basisfor air quality planning and regulation in California independent of federal

regulations, and establishes ambient air quality standards for the same criteria pollutants as the federal clean

air legislation.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. The district is comprised of eight counties that share a common

air district: Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and Tulare Counties. Local air pollution

control districts in California develop plans and implement control measures in their areas of jurisdiction. These

collectively make up California’s state implementation plan. These controls primarily affect stationary sources but

do include sources of dust and smoke. The following district regulations may directly or indirectly affect planning

in the Monument:

Public Nuisance (Rule 4102). Prohibits air discharge of material that causes nuisance or annoyance to any

considerable number of people.

Prescribed Burning and Hazard Reduction (Rule 4106) – This rule was adopted June 21, 2001, in response

to California’s Title 17, and is designed to permit, regulate, and coordinate the use of prescribed burning and

hazard reduction burning while minimizing smoke impacts on the public.

Fugitive Dust (Regulation 8). The existing Regulation 8 rules were developed to implement control strategies

for major sources of dust. These include construction, demolition, excavation, extraction, handling/storage,

landfills, paved/unpaved roads, and open areas. EPA has recently cited deficiencies in these existing rules

and the district is evaluating a series of new rules aimed at further reductions in particulates. The San Joaquin

Valley Air Pollution Control District (Valley Air District) is responsible for implementing and regulating air

quality programs for Fresno County, Tulare County, and a portion of Kern County in the Sequoia National

Forest. The Valley Air District regulations can be found at: http://www.valleyair.org/index.htm. The Valley

Air District has set rules to limit fugitive dust emissions. However, activities conducted at an elevation of

3,000 feet or higher above sea level are exempt. Kern County Air Pollution Control District, which serves

eastern Kern County, has set rules for fugitive dust but currently excludes national forests and recreation

areas.

Memorandum of understanding between the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the Forest Service,

signed on July 13, 1999. CARB has set more stringent standards, oversees state and local actions, and

implements programs for toxic air pollutants, heavy-duty trucks, locomotives, ships, aircraft, off-road diesel

equipment, and some types of industrial equipment.

The Smoke Management Guidelines for Agricultural and Prescribed Burning (Title 17) are the regulatory

basis for California’s smoke management program. Amendments to California’s Title 17 may directly or

indirectly affect planning in the Monument. The smoke management guidelines became effective on March

14, 2001. Local air pollution control districts use these guidelines in local rule development.

General Conformity State Implementation Plan Handbook (1995)

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

88

Legal and Regulatory Compliance
Climate Change

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) "State of Knowledge" paper (2007) development

Climate Change Consideration in Project Level NEPA Analysis, January 13, 2009

Comments: 53

Wildlife and Plant Habitat

Wildlife

Endangered Species Act (ESA). The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 USC 1531 et seq.) requires that

any action authorized by a federal agency not be likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a threatened

or endangered (TE) species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of habitat of such species that

is determined to be critical. Section 7 of the ESA, as amended, requires the responsible federal agency to

consult the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service concerning

TE species under their jurisdiction. It is Forest Service policy to analyze impacts to TE species to ensure

management activities are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a TE species or result in the

destruction or adverse modification of habitat ofsuch speciesthat is determined to be critical. This assessment

is documented in a biological assessment (BA).

FSM and FSH, Chapter 2670. Forest Service Sensitive (FSS) species are species identified by the regional

forester for which population viability is a concern. The Forest Service develops and implements management

practices to ensure that rare plants and animals do not become threatened or endangered and to ensure their

continued viability on national forests. It is Forest Service policy to analyze impacts to FSS species to ensure

management activities do not create a significant trend toward federal listing or loss of viability. This assessment

is documented in a biological evaluation (BE).

The California Condor Recovery Plan (USDI 1996) provides guidelines for management of nest and roost

sites. The 1988 Forest Plan designated the Starvation Grove nest area and Lion Ridge roost area, which are

within the Monument (USDA Forest Service 1988a pp. 3–29, 4–27 to 4–28).

Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940

Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918

Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle (VELB) Recovery Plan provides habitat management objectives from the

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USDI 1993b)

Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Species

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

89

Legal and Regulatory Compliance
Endangered Species Act (ESA). The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 USC 1531 et seq.) requires that

any action authorized by a federal agency not be likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a threatened

or endangered species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of habitat of such species that is

determined to be critical. Section 7 of the ESA, as amended, requires the responsible federal agency to consult

the USFWS and the National Marine Fisheries Service concerning threatened or endangered species under

their jurisdiction.

Executive Order 13112, Invasive Species 64 FR 6183 (February 8, 1999), to prevent and control the introduction

and spread of invasive species

FSM and FSH, Chapter 2670. Forest Service Sensitive (FSS)species are plantspeciesidentified by the regional

forester for which population viability is a concern. The Forest Service develops and implements management

practices to ensure that plants and animals do not become threatened or endangered and to ensure their

continued viability on national forests. It is Forest Service policy to analyze impacts to sensitive species to

ensure management activities do not create a significant trend toward federal listing or loss of viability.

Invasive Nonnative Species

FSM, Chapter 2081.03 requiresthat a weed risk assessment be conducted when any ground disturbing activity

is proposed. Determines the risk of introducing or spreading noxious weeds associated with the proposed

action. Projects having moderate to high risk of introducing or spreading noxious weeds must identify noxious

weed control measures that must be undertaken during project implementation.

Executive Order 13112 of Feb. 3, 1999 directsfederal agenciesto prevent the introduction of invasive species;

detect and respond rapidly to and control such species; not authorize, fund, or carry out actions that it believes

are likely to cause or promote the introduction or spread of invasive species unless the agency has determined

and made public its determination that the benefits of such actions clearly outweigh the potential harm caused

by invasive species; and take all feasible and prudent measures to minimize risk of harm in conjunction with

the actions.

Pacific Southwest Region Noxious Weed Management Strategy

Sequoia National Forest Weed Management Guidelines

Work cooperatively with California and Nevada State agencies and individual counties (for example,

Cooperative Weed Management Areas) to: (1) prevent the introduction and establishment of noxious weed

infestations and (2) control existing infestations.

The Forest Service will continue to participate in and work toward the goals of the California Interagency

Coordinating Committee Memorandum of Understanding signed in 1995. Coordinated weed management

will take place in the context of regional and local cooperative weed management areas, which allow effective

strategy development and cost-sharing in specific areas to solve common weed problems.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

90

Legal and Regulatory Compliance
Comments: 54

Range

Secretary of Agriculture regulations relating to grazing and livestock on the National Forest System in 36

CFR 222

Legislative authorities for administration of the National Forest System range program are described in FSM

2201. Objectives, policies, and responsibilities for the range management program are in FSM 2202 through

2204, and FSM 2230.01 through 2230.06. National direction and guidance for grazing permit administration

is contained in FSM 2230 through FSM 2238.

1997 Rangeland Analysis and Planning Guide

Comments: 55

Hydrological Resources

Organic Act of 1897, Object of Forest Reservations, states that "Public forest reservations are established to

protect and improve the forests for the purpose of...insuring conditions favorable to continuous water flow."

Clean Water Act of 1948 (as amended in 1972 and 1987) establishes as federal policy the control of point

and non-point source pollution and assigns the states the primary responsibility for control of water pollution.

Compliance with the Clean Water Act by national forests in California is achieved under state law.

Non-point source pollution on national forests is managed through the Regional Water Quality Management

Plan (USDA 2000), which relies on implementation of prescribed best management practices (BMPs).

The California Water Code consists of a comprehensive body of law that incorporates all state laws related

to water, including water rights, water developments, and water quality. The laws related to water quality

(Sections 13000 to 13485) apply to waters in national forests and are directed at protecting the beneficial uses

of water.

The Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act, as amended in 2006, is included in the California Water Code. This

act provides for the protection of water quality by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional

Water Quality Control Boards, which are authorized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to enforce

the Clean Water Act in California.

Executive Orders 11988 and 11990 (Floodplains and Wetlands) require federal agenciesto avoid, to the extent

possible, short- and long-term effects resulting from the occupancy and modification of floodplains and the

modification or destruction of wetlands. Standards and guidelines are provided for soil, water, wetlands, and

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

91

Legal and Regulatory Compliance
riparian areas to minimize effects to floodplains and wetlands. They incorporate the BMPs of the Soil and

Water Conservation Handbook. The standards and guidelines apply to all floodplains and wetlands where

less restrictive management might otherwise occur.

Clean Water Act of 1948 (as amended in 1972 and 1987) establishes as federal policy the control of point

and non-point pollution and assigns the states the primary responsibility for control of water pollution.

Compliance with the Clean Water Act by national forests in California is achieved under state law.

Region 5, FSH 2509.22, Chapter 20

Sequoia National Forest Cumulative Watershed Effects Field Guide (Kaplan-Henry and Machado 1991)

Comments: 56

Groundwater

Judicial doctrine and water-rights case law provide the legal interpretations of federal and state statutes about

usage and management of groundwater (see FSM 2541.01 and FSH 2509.16 for procedures to be followed

for complying with federal policy and state water rights laws).

The national groundwater policy sets out the framework in which groundwater resources are to be managed

on NFS lands. The policy is designed to be located in two parts of the Forest Service Manual: FSM 2880,

Geologic Resources, Hazards, and Services, and FSM 2543, Groundwater Resource Management. As of the

publication date of this document, FSM 2543 is in draft form and may change due to agency and public

comment prior to finalization.

Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended (42 U.S.C. §300f et seq.). The intent of the SDWA is to ensure

the safety of drinking water supplies. Its authority is used to establish drinking water standards and to protect

surface and groundwater supplies from contamination.

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended (42 U.S.C. §6901 et seq.). The Resource

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulates the generation, transportation, treatment, storage and

disposal of waste materials. It has very specific requirementsfor the protection and monitoring of groundwater

and surface water at operating facilities that may generate solid wastes or hazardous wastes.

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (42 U.S.C.

§9601 et seq.). Also known as “Superfund,” the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,

and Liability Act (CERCLA) regulates cleanup of existing environmental contamination at non-operating and

abandoned sites (see also FSM 2160).

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

92

Legal and Regulatory Compliance
National Environmental Policy Act of January 1, 1970 (NEPA) (83 Stat. 852 as Amended; 42 U.S.C. 4321,

4331-4335, 4341-4347) (FSM 1950.2). This act directs all agencies of the Federal Government to utilize a

systematic interdisciplinary approach which will ensure the integrated use of the natural and social sciences

in planning and in decision making which may have an impact on man's environment. Hydrogeology is one

of the applicable sciences.

Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of August 17, 1974 (RPA) (88 Stat. 476; 16 U.S.C.

1600-1614) as amended by National Forest Management Act of October 22, 1976 (90 Stat. 2949; 16 U.S.C.

1609) (FSM 1920 and FSM 2550). This act requires consideration of the geologic environment through the

identification of hazardous conditions and the prevention of irreversible damages. The Secretary of Agriculture

isrequired, in the development and maintenance of land management plans, to use a systematic interdisciplinary

approach to achieve integrated consideration of physical, biological, economic, and other sciences.

Federal Water Pollution Control Act of July 9, 1956, as Amended (33 U.S.C. 1151) (FSM 2501.1); Federal

Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (86 Stat. 816) (FSM 2501.1), and Clean Water Act of 1977

(91 Stat. 1566; 33 U.S.C. 1251) (FSM 2501.1, 7440.1). These acts are intended to enhance the quality and

value of the water resource and to establish a national policy for the prevention, control, and abatement of

water pollution. Groundwater information, including that concerning recharge and discharge areas, and

information on geologic conditions that affect ground water quality are needed to carry out purposes of these

acts.

Comments: 57

Geological Resources

Mining and Minerals Policy Act of December 31, 1970 (84 Stat. 1876; 30 U.S.C. 21a). This act provides for

the study and development of methods for the reclamation of mineral waste products and the reclamation of

mined lands. This requires an evaluation of geology as it relates to groundwater protection and geologic

stability.

Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of August 3, 1977 (SMCRA) (30 U.S.C. 1201, 1202, 1211,

1221–43, 1251–79, 1281, 1291, 1309, 1311–16, 1321–28). This act enables agencies to take action to prevent

water pollution from current mining activities and also promote reclamation of mined areas left without

adequate reclamation prior to this act.

Federal Cave Resources Protection Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4546; 16 U.S.C. 4301 et seq.). This act provides

that Federal lands be managed to protect and maintain, to the extent practical, significant caves.

Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of October 2, 1968 (82 Stat. 906 as Amended; 16 U.S.C. 1271-1287). This act

states that it is the policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the nation which, with their

immediate environments, possess outstanding scenic, recreation, geologic, fish and wildlife, cultural, or other

similar values shall be preserved in free-flowing condition.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

93

Legal and Regulatory Compliance
Comments: 58

Paleontological Resources

FSM 2360 pertaining to special interest areas

Comments: 59

Soils

National Soil Management Handbook: The Soil Management Handbook (USDA 1991) is a national soils

handbook that definessoil productivity and components ofsoil productivity, establishes guidance for measuring

soil productivity, and establishes thresholds to assist in forest planning.

Region 5 Soil Management Handbook Supplement (USDA 1991): The Forest Service Region 5 Soil

Management Handbook Supplement (R5 FSH Supplement 2509.18-95-1) establishes regional soil quality

analysisstandards. The analysisstandards addressthree basic elementsfor the soil resource: (1)soil productivity

(including soil loss, porosity; and organic matter); (2)soil hydrologic function; and (3)soil buffering capacity.

The analysis standards are to be used for areas dedicated to growing vegetation. They are not applied to lands

with other dedicated uses such as developed campgrounds or administrative facilities.

Regional Forester’s Letter (dated Feb 5, 2007): This letter provided clarification to forest supervisors on the

appropriate use of the R5 Soil Management Handbook Supplement (R5 FSH Supplement 2509.18-95-1).

Comments: 60

Human Use (Including Recreation, Scenery, and Socioeconomic)

Recreation

Several authorities guide the provision of recreation opportunities. The FSM provides policy direction, primarily

in FSM 2300 for recreation and FSM 2700 for special uses, for both recreation special uses and non-recreation

special uses.

The primary management authorities for recreation and related resources are:

The Term Permit Act of 1915 (38 Stat. 1101, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 497)

The Multiple Use Sustained-Yield Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 215, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 528-531)

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

94

Legal and Regulatory Compliance
The Wilderness Act of 1964 (16 U.S.C. 1131-1136)

The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-665; 80 Stat. 915; 16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.)

The Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act, Title VIII, Div. J., of the Consolidated Appropriations Act

for 2005, Pub. L. 108-447

The Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4151 et seq.)

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, Sections 504 and 508 (29 U.S.C. 794 and 794d)

Title V, Section 507c of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.)

In addition, the Organic Act of 1897, as amended (FSM 1021.11a), instructsthe Secretary of Agriculture to preserve

and to regulate occupancy and use of the national forests (16 U.S.C. 473-478, 479-482, 551); prohibitions on the

use of National Forest System lands are contained in 36 CFR 261 (FSM 1023.4).

Numerous statutory authorities govern the issuance and administration of special use authorizations on National

Forest System lands. Some of those laws are:

The Organic Administration Act of 1897 (16 U.S.C. 477-482, 551)

The Act of March 4, 1915, as amended in 1956 (16 U.S.C. 497), which authorizes term permits

Section 7 of the Granger-Thye Act of 1950 (16 U.S.C. 490, 504, 504a, 555, 557, 571c, 572, 579a, 580c-5801,

581i-1)

The Independent Offices Appropriation Act of 1952, as amended (31 U.S.C. 9701) (Office of Management

and Budget Circular No. A-25 further defines this authority)

The Wilderness Act of 1964 (16 U.S.C. 1131-1136)

The Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1964, as amended (16 U.S.C. 4601-6a(c))

The National Forest Roads and Trails Act of 1964 (16 U.S.C. 532-38)

Title V of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1761-1771)

The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act of 1980 (16 U.S.C 3210)

The National Forest Ski Area Permit Act of 1986 (16 U.S.C. 497b)

The Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 (16 U.S.C. 497c)

The Act of May 26, 2000 (16 U.S.C. 406l-6d), which supplementsthe authority to regulate commercial filming

and still photography

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

95

Legal and Regulatory Compliance
The Cabin User Fee Fairness Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 6201-6213)

The National Forest Organizational Camp Fee Improvement Act of 2003 (16 U.S.C. 6231 et seq.).

Special use regulations are in 36 CFR 251.

Scenery

Agriculture Handbook 434:1973, National Forest Landscape Management, Volume 1

Agriculture Handbook 701:1995, Landscape Aesthetics, A Handbook for Scenery Management

Built Environment Image Guide (BEIG): The built environment, as used in this guide, refers to the

administrative and recreation buildings, landscape structures, site furnishings, structures on roads and trails,

and signsinstalled or operated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service, its cooperators,

and permittees.

The elements of the built environment constructed on national forest lands and grasslands, or those used for

administrative purposes in rural areas, towns, and cities, shall—to the extent practicable—incorporate the

principles of sustainability, reflect their place within the natural and cultural landscape, and provide optimal

service to our customers and cooperators. These elements will:

Be located, planned, and designed with respect for the natural systems in which they reside.

Aesthetically integrate their natural, cultural, and experiential context.

Contain design elements, including appropriate signs, that reinforce a national agency identity.

Emphasize efficiency of energy and materials consumption in construction and operation.

Serve as premier examples to interpret conservation of natural resources and sustainable development.

Create environments for people to enjoy and gain increased appreciation for the natural environment,

and in which employees work productively, experiencing the connection to the resources they manage.

In so doing, the USDA Forest Service built environment willstrengthen and reinforce the image of the agency

as an international conservation leader.

Socioeconomics

Antiquities Act of 1906

Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) of 1990

Social Impact Analysis (1900-03)

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

96

Legal and Regulatory Compliance
Civil Rights Impact Analysis (CRIA) (FSM 1730.3)

The Civil Rights Policy for the USDA, Departmental Regulation 4300-4 dated May 30, 2003 (7 CFR 15d)

Civil Rights and Environmental Justice

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d -2000d-7: Sec. 2000d). Prohibition against

exclusion from participation in, denial of benefits of, and discrimination under federally assisted programs

on grounds of race, color, or national origin.

Executive Order (EO) 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and

Low-income Populations. Requires each federal agency to make achieving environmental justice part of its

mission.

Departmental Regulation (DR) 5600-2. Provides direction to agencies for integrating environmental justice

considerations into USDA programs and activities, in compliance with EO 12898.

Comments: 61

Cultural Resources

Organic Act of 1897 (Title 16, United States Code (U.S.C.), section 473-478, 479-482, 551)

Antiquities Act of 1906 (16 U.S.C. 431)

Historic Sites Act of 1935 (16 U.S.C. 461)

National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA), as amended (16 U.S.C. 470), and its implementing

regulation 36 CFR 800

Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (AHPA) (16 U.S.C. 469)

Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 (ARPA), as amended (16 U.S.C. 47Oaa et seq.), as

implemented by 36 CFR part 296

Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 (NAGPRA), as amended (25 U.S.C. 3001),

as implemented by 43 CFR Part 10, Subpart B – Human Remains, Funerary Objects, Sacred Objects, or

Objects of Cultural Patrimony From Federal or Tribal Lands

Curation of Federally-owned and Administered Archaeological Collections, 36 CFR part 79

National Indian Forest Resources Management Act (NIFRMA), Public Law 101-630, November 28, 1990

American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA) (Public Law 103-344, October 6, 1994)

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

97

Legal and Regulatory Compliance
Tribal Forest Protection Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-278, July 22, 2004)

Executive Order 11593, Protection and Enhancement of the Cultural Environment, issued May 13, 1971

Executive Order 13007, Indian Sacred Sites, issued May 24, 1996

Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, issued November

6, 2000

Executive Order 13287, Preserve America, issued March 3, 2003

The First Amended Regional Programmatic Agreement Among the U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest

Region, California State Historic Preservation Officer, and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation

Regarding the Process for Compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for

Undertakings on the National Forests of the Pacific Southwest Region (2001)

The Programmatic Agreement Among the U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, California

State Historic Preservation Officer, and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Regarding the Identification,

Evaluation and Treatment of Historic Properties managed by the National Forests of the Sierra Nevada,

California (1996)

Other regional programmatic agreements for individual historic property types, including lookouts,

administrative buildings, and recreation residences, and specific undertaking types of fuel reduction and range;

and subsequently issued programmatic agreements

FSM 2300, Chapter 2360, Heritage Program Management

FSM 1500, External Relations, Chapter 1560 - State Tribal, County, And Local Agencies, Public and Private

Organizations (2007)

FSH 1509.13, American Indian and Alaska Native Relations Handbook

Comments: 62

Transportation

Highway Safety Act of 1966: The Department of Transportation is authorized and directed to assist and

cooperate with other federal departments and agencies, state and local governments, private industry, and

other interested parties to increase highway safety. Each state is responsible for implementing a highway

safety program to reduce traffic accidents and deaths, injuries, and property damage.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

98

Legal and Regulatory Compliance
Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 212 (36 CFR 212): The implementing regulation for the National

Forest Roads and Trails Act (FRTA) includes portions of the Travel Management Rule published in the

Federal Register on November 9, 2005. Part 212, Subpart B, provides criteria for designation of roads and

trails. Providing safe transportation facilities and considering the affordability of maintaining the transportation

facilities are two of the criteria.

The California Vehicle Code (CVC): The CVC contains regulations related to the use of motor vehicles in

California, including motor vehicles used on the national forests. The CVC sets safety standards for motor

vehicles and vehicle operators. It defines the safety equipment needed for highway legal and non-highway

legal vehicles. The code also defines the roads and trails where non-highway legal motor vehicles may be

operated.

FSM sections 2350 and 7700 contain agency policy for management of the National Forest Transportation

System (NFTS). FSH 7709.59 describes the maintenance management system the Forest Service uses and

the maintenance standards needed to meet road management objectives (RMOs). FSH 2309.18 describes the

maintenance management system the Forest Service uses and the maintenance standards needed to meet trail

management objectives (TMOs).

Comments: 63

Special Forest Products

USDA Forest Service, 36 CFR Parts 223 and 261, Sale and Disposal of National Forest Products and Forest

Botanical Products

Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 249/December 29, 2008/Rules and Regulations (FR 2008)

Comments: 64

Standards and Guidelines

Standards and guidelines are requirements that preclude or impose limitations on resource management activities

and are designed to be consistent with the objectives and desired conditions; they come into play as site-specific

activities are planned to implement the Monument Plan. The standards and guidelines act asthresholds or constraints

for management activities or practicesto ensure the protection of resources. They may apply to the entire Monument

or they may only apply to certain land allocations. The standards and guidelines for the Monument are organized

by resource area in Appendix F of this Plan.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

99

Legal and Regulatory Compliance
The Monument Plan is an integral part of the adaptive management cycle that will provide a framework to guide

future management decisions and actions. Monitoring and evaluation activities in the Monument are closely linked

to the adaptive management strategy in the 2001 SNFPA. Adaptive management is the process of continually

adjusting management in response to new information, knowledge, or technologies. It includes defining measurable

objectives, monitoring, learning and changing, and recognizing that uncertainties exist in the course of achieving

management goals.

Forest plan monitoring and evaluation is conducted to determine how well the managementstrategy for the Monument

(strategies, objectives, and standards and guidelines) has been met, and how closely standards and guidelines have

been applied. The Monument Plan monitoring process responds to specific requirements of the 1969 National

Forest Management Act that must be met on a forest-wide basis, and the need to monitor forest management on a

forest-wide basis.

The monitoring plan presented in the table below consists of those special activities that focus on evaluating the

broad aspects of plan implementation. Most importantly, the monitoring plan includes elements for protecting the

objects of interest identified in the Proclamation, including:

The naturally-occurring giant sequoia groves and their associated ecosystems, individual giant trees, rare and

endemic plant species such as the Springville clarkia, and other species listed as threatened or endangered by

the Endangered Species Act (ESA), or sensitive by the Forest Service.

The ecosystems and outstanding landscapes that surround the giant sequoia groves.

The diverse array of rare animalspecies, including the Pacific fisher, the great gray owl, the American marten,

the northern goshawk, the peregrine falcon, the California spotted owl, the California condor, several rare

amphibians, the western pond turtle, and other species listed as threatened or endangered by the ESA, or

sensitive by the Forest Service.

The paleontological resources in meadow sediments and other sources that have recorded ecological changes

in such markers as fire regimes, volcanism, vegetation, and climate.

The limestone caverns and other geologic features, including granite domes, spires, geothermally-produced

hot springs and soda springs, and glacial and river-carved gorges.

Cultural resources, both historic and prehistoric, which provide a record of human adaptation to the landscape,

and land use patterns that have shaped ecosystems.

Cultural resources are monitored based on law, regulation, and policy. Most monitoring takes place based on

site-specific project needs and are developed through the process codified in the National Historic Preservation

Act (NHPA) in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer and Advisor Council on Historic Preservation.

Monitoring is based on the potential to impact historic properties listed and/or potentially eligible for listing on the

National Register of Historic Places. Standard protection and mitigation measures, and monitoring of those measures,

can be found in the First Amended Regional Programmatic Agreement Among the U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Pacific

Southwest Region, California State Historic Preservation Officer, and Advisory Council on Historic Preservation

Regarding the Process for Compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for Undertakings

on the National Forests of the Pacific Southwest Region (2001) (Regional PA), the Programmatic Agreement

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

100

Monitoring and Evaluation
Among the U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, California State Historic Preservation Officer, and

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Regarding the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Historic

Properties managed by the National forests of the Sierra Nevada, California (1996).

Other monitoring consists of reports, reviews, and recordsthat occur as a routine part of forest management. Actions

not duplicated in this plan include such things as: accomplishment reporting (roads, etc.); individual and annual

fire reports; management attainment reports; annual vegetation management action plans, reviews, and reports;

budget and financial management documents; recreation information management reports and databases; visitor

use monitoring; special uses administration; environmental analysis reports; activity reviews; audits; and general

management reviews; as well as site-specific project monitoring.

Monitoring and evaluation are separate, sequential tasks. Monitoring is designed to observe and record the results

of both natural processes and management actions permitted by forest land and resource management plans.

Evaluation looks at those results, determines how well those results meet forest plan direction, and identifies

measures to adjust management direction in response to this new information.

Management review of the monitoring information discusses the following questions:

Has the Sequoia National Forest taken actions to protect objects of interest and their ecosystems?

Has on-the-ground management in the Monument maintained or made progresstoward the desired conditions?

What changes are needed to account for unanticipated changes in conditions?

Actual performance istracked over time through annual documentation of accomplishments. The Forest Supervisor

and other managers will display monitoring results in evaluation reports after a management review and determine

if any changes are needed in plan guidance. These data will no longer be reported in the annual report agreed to in

the MSA, but rather will be reported in an annual monitoring and evaluation report (Forest Plan Monitoring Report).

This report will include both site-specific project monitoring and forest-wide (programmatic level) monitoring. For

all Monument projects that include a proposal for tree removal, this report will include documentation of the clear

need for removing trees for ecological restoration and maintenance or public safety.

Comments: 65

Types of Monitoring

The table below includes monitoring or inventory program areas or projects, monitoring questions, associated

performance measures, and the frequency of reporting (annual or other time period). It also documents the source,

or who is expected to conduct the monitoring. Most of the monitoring will be conducted by the Sequoia National

Forest (SQF), sometimes engaging the Pacific Southwest Region (RO), or another regional entity or program (such

as the Pacific Southwest Research Station (PSW)), for consultation and assistance as needed and as resources are

available.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

101

Monitoring and Evaluation
The types of monitoring are:

Implementation monitoring: Determines if the management strategy (strategies, objectives, and standards

and guidelines) is implemented as designed and in compliance with the Monument Plan. Implementation

monitoring answers the question: "Were the management activities to protect the objects of interest and their

ecosystems accomplished as specified in the Monument Plan?"

Effectiveness monitoring: Determines if the management strategy (strategies, objectives, and standards and

guidelines) is effective in moving the Monument toward desired conditions. This type of monitoring provides

a better understanding of how ecosystem components, structures, and processes have responded to the

managementstrategy and answersthe question: "Did the managementstrategy actually work to move monument

resources closer to their desired conditions?"

Validation monitoring: Determines whether the initial data and assumptions used in development of the

Monument Plan and its management strategy are correct, or if there is a better way to meet forest planning

regulations, policies, goals, strategies, and objectives. Validation monitoring is generally done only when

implementation or effectiveness monitoring resultssuggest that a given practice may not have been implemented

properly or was not effective in achieving expected outcomes. Validation monitoring is usually conducted by

researchers.

Status and trend monitoring of ecosystem conditions and management activities: Assesses important

biological, physical, and sociocultural conditions, to gauge whether desired conditions are being achieved

and provide early warning of unanticipated impacts from management activities evaluated at a large scale.

Baseline data are required before status and trend monitoring can occur. Baseline can be considered a component

of implementation monitoring, while status and trend can be considered a component of effectiveness

monitoring.

Table 30 Monitoring Plan

Frequency of

Reporting and

Source

Type of

Monitoring

Monitoring or Monitoring Question Performance Measures

Inventory Program or

Project

AIR QUALITY

Review project records for Implementation Ongoing

compliance.

Were all fuels

reduction projects

exceeding 250 acres

monitored?

Air quality

SQF

Micrograms/cubic meter of Effectiveness Bi-annually

PM25, visual observations.

Did smoke from

prescribed fire

contribute to public

nuisance or health

standard violations?

SQF

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

102

Monitoring and Evaluation
Frequency of

Reporting and

Source

Type of

Monitoring

Monitoring or Monitoring Question Performance Measures

Inventory Program or

Project

Effectiveness/Status Ongoing

and Trend

Chemical constituents of

atmospheric aerosols.

What is the trend of

air quality conditions

associated with

prescribed fire and

wildfire?

Air quality conditions

Committee for

Interagency

Monitoring for

Protected Visual

Environments

(IMPROVE), SQF

ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS

Within 5 years of

ROD, as new

science/information

available.

# of landscape analyses Implementation

(hydrologic unit code [HUC]

6th-field) completed.

Have Monument

landscapes been

analyzed to identify

opportunities for

Assessment of watershed

condition

site-specific

environmental SQF

analysis including

reduction of risks and

hazards associated

with wildfire;

opportunities for

ecological restoration;

program and budget

development; and

priorities for cultural,

social and economic

ecological needs?

Within 5 years of

ROD, as new

science/information

available.

# of landscape analyses(HUC Implementation

6th-field) completed that

identified this.

Was current

distribution of

geologically unstable

lands identified in

landscape analysis?

SQF

Ongoing, in

response to flood

events.

Channel geometry, discharge Implementation

relationships.

What are the current

distribution and

location of flooding,

Assessment of watershed

condition: stream

channel discharge and

geometry relationships

SQF

and discharge

relationships for

channels?

What are the Stream bank erosion. Implementation Ongoing

background stream

channel erosion rates?

Assessment of watershed

condition: stream bank

erosion rates SQF

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

103

Monitoring and Evaluation
Frequency of

Reporting and

Source

Type of

Monitoring

Monitoring or Monitoring Question Performance Measures

Inventory Program or

Project

Channel geometry, discharge Implementation Ongoing

relationships at the new HUC

scale.

Are discharge and

channel geometry

relationships

established?

Assessment of watershed

condition: stream

channel discharge and

geometry relationships

SQF

In response to flood

events

Review the watershed Implementation

condition assessment data.

Were the areas with a

history of flooding

identified in landscape

analysis? SQF

Before site-specific

project analysis

# of completed landscape Implementation

analyses at the 6th-field HUC

level.

Did the landscape

analysis identify areas

of special concern,

Assessment of watershed

condition: areas of

special concern

raise awareness of SQF

conditions, and result

in mitigation/ design

modification/

protection/ action?

After site-specific

project or

disturbance

Effectiveness/

Status and Trend

Have background Stream bank erosion.

stream channel

erosion rates changed

Stream bank erosion

rates

as a result of natural

processes (including SQF

fire) or management

actions?

Compare 5th-field HUC Validation After disturbance

stream channel discharge and

geometry data with 6th field

HUC data.

Are discharge and

channel geometry

relationships for the

5th-field HUC

accurate at the

6th-field HUC?

Stream channel

discharge and geometry

relationships SQF

Compare 5th-field HUC Validation After disturbance

erosion rates with 6th-field

HUC rates.

Are stream bank

erosion rates for the

5th-field HUC

accurate at the

6th-field HUC?

Stream bank erosion

rates

SQF

AQUATIC RESOURCES

Every 5 years after

plots established

Stream condition, aquatic Implementation

macro invertebrates.

What is the current

state of aquatic

resources and habitat

conditions?

Aquatic resource and

habitat condition

SQF

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

104

Monitoring and Evaluation
Frequency of

Reporting and

Source

Type of

Monitoring

Monitoring or Monitoring Question Performance Measures

Inventory Program or

Project

Effectiveness/ After disturbances

status and trend

Analysis of stream condition

inventories for change.

Did stream condition

inventory data show

changes in aquatic SQF

resource and habitat

conditions following

large-scale

disturbances (such as

fires and floods)?

Changes in stability and Effectiveness After disturbances

indicators of disequilibrium.

Are stream systems

capable of moving

sediment without SQF

causing channel

alterations and

damage to riparian

and aquatic habitat?

Inventories and/or analysis of Implementation After disturbances

aquatic resources.

What is the current

state of aquatic

resources and habitat

conditions within the

watershed?

Aquatic resource and

habitat condition

SQF

Evaluate assumptions for Effectiveness After disturbances

flooding events.

Did the assumptions

used to formulate

flooding potential on

Protection from flooding

SQF

life, property, and

natural resources help

reduce or avoid

damage from

flooding?

% implementation monitoring Implementation Ongoing

of BMPs.

Were best

management practices

(BMPs) identified for

all activities in the

Monument?

Water quality

SQF

After site-specific

projects

% effectiveness monitoring of Implementation

BMPs.

Were BMPs

monitored on all

projects?

SQF

After site-specific

projects

Were BMP SCI surveys. Effectiveness

prescriptions effective

in protecting soil and

water resources of the

watersheds?

SQF

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

105

Monitoring and Evaluation
Frequency of

Reporting and

Source

Type of

Monitoring

Monitoring or Monitoring Question Performance Measures

Inventory Program or

Project

CAVES

Were cave resources # of caves inventoried. Implementation Ongoing

considered in

landscape analyses?

Cave condition

SQF

# of caves affected by Effectiveness Every 3 years

management activities.

Are caves affected by

management

activities? SQF

Condition of Church and Status and trend Annually

Boyden Caves.

Are gates secured and

cave features

protected in Church

and Boyden Caves?

SQF

FIRE AND FUELS

Within 5 years of

ROD, as new

science/

information

available

Ground fuels, ladder fuels, Implementation

crown bulk density, and tree

density. Acres in need of

treatment as determined in

landscape analysis.

Have we identified

areas of fire

susceptibility that

need to be treated to

move toward desired

conditions?

Fire susceptibility

SQF

Acres of fire susceptibility Implementation Every 5 years

meeting desired conditions.

Have we treated areas

of high fire

susceptibility to move

toward desired

conditions?

SQF

Within 5 years of

ROD, as new

science/information

available

Ground fuels, ladder fuels, Implementation

crown bulk density, and tree

density. Acres in need of

treatment as determined in

landscape analysis.

Have we identified

areas in the WUI and

general forest that

need treatment to

reduce the threat and

severity of wildfire?

Fire threat and severity

SQF

Treatment characteristics Effectiveness Every 5 years

(location and type), ground

fuels, ladder fuels, crown bulk

density, and tree density.

Do fire and fuel

treatmentsin the WUI

and general forest

reduce the threat and

severity of wildfire?

SQF

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

106

Monitoring and Evaluation
Frequency of

Reporting and

Source

Type of

Monitoring

Monitoring or Monitoring Question Performance Measures

Inventory Program or

Project

Every 5 years, or

following major

wildfire events

Severity, rate of spread, fire Effectiveness

type, intensity, frequency,

spotting, crown bulk density,

tree density.

Are the fire and fuel

strategies and

treatments effective in

achieving the desired

Fire behavior and fire

regime

fire behavior and fire SQF

regimes within

vegetation types or

series?

Every 5 years, or

following major

wildfire events

Effectiveness/

validation

Vegetation composition and

structure,surface fuels, crown

loading.

How effective are fuel

treatments(prescribed

burning, hand and

Fuel loading

mechanical

treatments) and SQF

managed wildfire in

achieving desired fuel

loading at treatment

sites?

Acres of prescribed burns, Implementation Annually

acres of managed wildfire.

Are prescribed burns

and managed wildfire

being used to meet or

trend toward the

desired conditions?

Prescribed burns and

managed wildfire

SQF

INVASIVE PLANTS/NOXIOUS WEEDS

Within 3 years of

ROD, as new

science/information

available

Miles of roads and trails Implementation

inventoried, distribution of

noxious weeds.

What is the

distribution of noxious

weeds?

Noxious weed inventory

SQF

Effectiveness/ Ongoing

status and trend

Noxious weed populations

and distribution.

Are noxious weed

populations

responding to the

managementstrategy?

SQF

RANGE

Annually, at end of

grazing season

Did grazing utilization Indices of RDM. Implementation

follow standards and

guidelinesfor residual

dry matter (RDM)?

Utilization standards:

lower westside

hardwoods

SQF

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

107

Monitoring and Evaluation
Frequency of

Reporting and

Source

Type of

Monitoring

Monitoring or Monitoring Question Performance Measures

Inventory Program or

Project

Annually, at end of

grazing season

% livestock browse on annual Effectiveness

growth of hardwood seedlings

and advanced regeneration.

Are utilization

standards for oaks

being met within the

Monument? SQF

Annually, at end of

grazing season

Did grazing utilization % ground cover. Effectiveness

maintain at least 60%

cover in annual

grasslands? SQF

Grazing utilization of oak Effectiveness Every 5 years

regeneration.

Are grazing utilization

standards for oak

regeneration meeting

desired conditions?

SQF

Annually, at end of

grazing season

Ecological status of meadows Implementation

per R5 monitoring protocol.

Are grazing utilization

standards being met

for meadow

vegetation?

Utilization standards:

aquatic, meadow, and

riparian ecosystems

SQF

Has the range of Riparian condition. Implementation Annually

natural variability

been determined in the

Monument?

Ecological status: range

of natural variability

SQF

Are stream banks % stream bank alteration. Implementation Annually

maintained at desired

conditions?

Ecologicalstatus:stream

banks

SQF

Effectiveness/ Every 5 years

status and trend

Change in wetland rating,

vegetation rating, riparian

condition, stream condition,

and ecological status per R5

monitoring protocol.

What isthe ecological

status and trend of key

aquatic, meadow, and

riparian ecosystems

within allotments?

Ecological status:

aquatic, meadow, and

riparian ecosystems SQF

Riparian vegetation within Effectiveness Annually

allotments.

Are special aquatic

features protected

from grazing?

Ecologicalstatus:special

aquatic features

SQF

% browsed mature riparian Effectiveness Annually

shrubs and individual

seedlings.

Are grazing utilization

standards being met

for woody riparian

shrubs?

Ecologicalstatus: woody

riparian shrubs

SQF

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

108

Monitoring and Evaluation
Frequency of

Reporting and

Source

Type of

Monitoring

Monitoring or Monitoring Question Performance Measures

Inventory Program or

Project

SOCIOECONOMICS

How are communities Change in demographics. Status and trend Every 10 years

changing in response

to social and

economic conditions?

Socioeconomic

RO

What is the capacity Housing, Status and trend Every 10 years

for economic

development in

gateway

communities?

employment by industry, RO

index of industrial

specialization,

place of work,

source of income.

THREATENED, ENDANGERED, AND SENSITIVE (TES) PLANTS

What is the status of Plant survey. Implementation Annually

known populations of

and suitable habitat

TES plants

SQF

for TES species

(specifically

Springville Clarkia)?

Effectiveness/ Annually

status and trend

Analysis of population

demographics.

Is there any change in

the status, location,

and suitable habitat

TES plants

SQF

for TES species

(specifically the

Springville clarkia)?

VEGETATION

Dbh, age, height, crown ratio, Implementation 1-10 years

and crown height (common

stand exams).

What is the size and

age of giant sequoias?

What is the number of

larger or monarch

giant sequoias?

Giant sequoia groves

SQF

Age, # by species (common Implementation 10 years

stand exams).

What is the age and

species composition

of vegetation? SQF

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

109

Monitoring and Evaluation
Frequency of

Reporting and

Source

Type of

Monitoring

Monitoring or Monitoring Question Performance Measures

Inventory Program or

Project

Height by seral stage and Implementation 5-10 years

species, amount of down

woody material (common

stand exams).

What is the status of

ladder fuels and fuel

loading? SQF

# of seedlings and saplings Implementation 5-10 years

(common stand exams).

What is the status of

regeneration?

SQF

Dbh, age, height, crown ratio, Effectiveness 2-5 years

and crown height (common

stand exams).

What is the change in

structure of giant

sequoia groves and is

it trending toward

desired conditions?

SQF

Age, # by species (common Effectiveness 2-5 years

stand exams).

What is the change in

age and species

composition and is it

trending toward

desired conditions?

SQF

Height by seral stage and Effectiveness 2-5 years

species, amount of down

woody material (common

stand exams).

What is the change in

ladder fuels and fuel

loading and is it

trending toward

desired conditions?

SQF

# of seedlings and saplings Effectiveness 2-5 years

(common stand exams).

What is the change in

status of regeneration

and is it trending

toward desired

conditions?

SQF

Age, # by species (common Implementation 10 years

stand exams).

What is the age and

species composition

of vegetation?

General forest outside

groves

SQF

Height by seral stage and Implementation 10 years

species, amount of down

woody material (common

stand exams).

What is the status of

ladder fuels and fuel

loading? SQF

# of seedlings and saplings Implementation 10 years

(common stand exams).

What is the status of

regeneration?

SQF

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

110

Monitoring and Evaluation
Frequency of

Reporting and

Source

Type of

Monitoring

Monitoring or Monitoring Question Performance Measures

Inventory Program or

Project

Age, # by species (common Effectiveness 10 years

stand exams).

What is the change in

age and species

composition and is it

trending toward

desired conditions?

SQF

Height by seral stage and Effectiveness 10 years

species, amount of down

woody material (common

stand exams, FIA plots).

What is the change in

ladder fuels and fuel

loading and is it

trending toward

desired conditions?

SQF

# of seedlings and saplings Effectiveness 10 years

(common stand exams, FIA

plots).

What is the change in

status of regeneration

and is it trending

toward desired

conditions?

SQF

Canopy cover, acres of Effectiveness 10-20 years

canopy gaps (common stand

exams).

Are gaps in the

canopy large or

frequent enough to

Canopy gap analysis

SQF

meet desired

conditions for

regeneration of pines

and giant sequoia?

WILDLIFE

Occupancy, habitat Implementation Ongoing

conditions.

Does Monument

management strategy

provide for the

protection of wildlife

habitat?

Wildlife protection

SQF

Within 5 years of

ROD, as new

science/

information

available

Occupancy, habitat Effectiveness

conditions.

Are wildlife species

adequately protected?

Terrestrial wildlife

SQF

What is the status of Detection rates. Effectiveness Ongoing

the Pacific fisher RO

population in the

Monument?

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

111

Monitoring and Evaluation
Frequency of

Reporting and

Source

Type of

Monitoring

Monitoring or Monitoring Question Performance Measures

Inventory Program or

Project

Occupancy, habitat conditions Effectiveness Every 4 years

at the five historically

occupied sites.

What is the status of

the willow flycatcher

population and its

suitable habitat?

SQF

Comments: 66

Monitoring Trends and Performance Measures

Monitoring identified in the monitoring plan above is focused on program implementation. The Sequoia National

Forest currently uses performance measuresfor tracking program accomplishments. The currentsystem is expected

to be replaced by a performance accountability system integrating annual budgets with programs of work (WorkPlan)

and linking these to tracking of activities designed to implement the National Strategic Plan through the Forest

Activities Tracking System (FACTS) or subsequent reporting system.

Actual performance is tracked over time through annual documentation of accomplishment, and these trends are

evaluated periodically to determine if the national forest needs to shift program strategies. These data are reported

in the annual forest plan monitoring report as part of the Sequoia National Forest’s implementation monitoring

efforts.

Inventory is a continuous effort. As funding is available, priority inventories are implemented and reported through

various resource information systems, such as the Natural Resources Information System (NRIS) and the

Infrastructure database (INFRA). Periodic evaluation of inventory data is used to explore trendsin resource conditions

over time. Annual forest plan monitoring reports will document when there is a need to change the Monument Plan

in response to changing trends in resource conditions.

Comments: 67

General Budget History

The Sequoia National Forest’s budget allocationsincreased, even on an inflation-adjusted basis, from 1995 to 2009.

Analysis of budget history indicates that practically all the increase was for hazardous fuels reduction and fire

pre-suppression (preparedness) to implement the National Fire Plan. Some other program budgets have increased

at roughly the rate of inflation. Excluding expenditures for wildland fire suppression and national fire and disaster

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

112

Monitoring and Evaluation
support (which are paid when incurred by the Forest Service’s national organizations), the total budget for fiscal

year 2009 was more than $1.9 billion for national forests and grasslands. For the Sequoia National Forest, the

budget allocations for fiscal year 2009 were:

Fire/Fuels Management Program -- $16,145,000

Recreation/Facilities/Trails -- $2,179,165

Natural Resources -- $2,315,000

Comments: 68

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

113

Monitoring and Evaluation
Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan 114

Appendices
Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

115

Appendix A-Location Map (California)
Map 5 Location of the Monument (California)

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

116

Appendix A-Location Map (California)
Comments: 69

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

117

Appendix A-Location Map (California)
Map 6 Location Map (Local)

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

118

Appendix B-Location Map (Local)
Comments: 70

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

119

Appendix B-Location Map (Local)
Table 31 Sequoia Groves and Grove Complexes

Acres in Sequoia Groves within Grove Complex

National Forest

Grove or Complex Name Date Inventoried (1)

NORTHERN PORTION:

1. Abbott Creek October 2009 25

2. Agnew October 2009 43

3. Bearskin October 2009 187

4. Big Stump January 2002 431

5. Cherry Gap October 1999 170

6. Converse Basin November 1998 4,666

7. Deer Meadow October 2009 168

Evans, Boulder, Little Boulder,

Lockwood, Kennedy, Horseshoe

Bend

October 2009 4,256

8. Evans Complex

9. Grant January 2002 292

10. Indian Basin April 2004 448

11. Landslide October 1999 226

12. Monarch October 2009 54

13. Redwood Mountain September 2003 1,036

SOUTHERN PORTION:

14. Alder Creek February 2004 409

Belknap, Wheel Meadow, McIntyre,

Carr Wilson

October 2009 3,084 15. Belknap Complex

16. Black Mountain February 2004 2,614

17. Burro Creek October 2009 278

18. Cunningham October 2009 32

19. Deer Creek November 1998 144

20. Dillonwood October 2009 373

21. Freeman Creek October 2009 4,192

22. Long Meadow November 1999 568

23. Maggie Mountain October 2009 64

24. Middle Tule October 2009 301

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

120

Appendix C-Giant Sequoia Groves List
Acres in Sequoia Groves within Grove Complex

National Forest

Grove or Complex Name Date Inventoried (1)

25. Mountain Home February 2004 1,295

26. Packsaddle March 2004 533

27. Peyrone February 2004 741

28. Red Hill February 2004 602

29. Silver Creek October 2009 108

30. South Peyrone October 2009 115

31. Starvation Complex January 2000 182 Starvation Creek, Powderhorn

32. Upper Tule October 2009 22

33. Wishon October 2009 171

Total Acres of Groves in Sequoia National Forest 27,830

1. Groves within close proximity to each other were identified as grove complexes during boundary mapping per the MSA

(MSA II.B.2.c.(2)(e) ii), p.14)

Comments: 71

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

121

Appendix C-Giant Sequoia Groves List
Map 7 Giant Sequoia Groves

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

122

Appendix D-Giant Sequoia Groves Map
Comments: 72

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

123

Appendix D-Giant Sequoia Groves Map
Partnership Strategy for the Sequoia National Forest and Giant Sequoia

National Monument

Partnerships in land stewardship reflect a growing and important trend: the joining of passion and resources by

committed citizens, organizations, and government agenciesto achieve social, economic, and ecological goals. The

Forest Service has worked with partners throughout its 100-year history. But the problems of land management

have grown more complex, and the needs of the public more varied. The American people today are voicing their

strong desire to volunteer and participate in the stewardship of natural resources and in the decisions that affect

their communities (National Partnership Office 2005, accessed on December 21, 2009 from

http://www.partnershipresourcecenter.org/resources/partnership-guide/ ).

Creating a Partnership Culture

The Forest Supervisor on the Sequoia National Forest (SQF) and Giant Sequoia National Monument (Monument)

is responding to the needs of a varied public by empowering employees and communities of place, interest, and

culture to create and sustain successful partnerships. The forest supervisor and forest staff have established the

following partnership goals to accomplish the Forest Service mission and build a strong community of stewardship

on the SQF and Monument:

Through partnership, sustain the health, diversity and productivity of the Sequoia National Forest and Giant

Sequoia National Monument.

Build community support for, and understanding of, the Sequoia National Forest and Giant Sequoia National

Monument.

Enhance opportunities to connect people to the land, especially in urban areas and of diverse cultures.

Expand partnerships with other federal, state, and local government agencies, as well as associations,

non-government organizations, and other community groups, to leverage information and resourcesfor mutual

benefit.

Foster partnerships dealing with science.

Create more “citizen stewards” of the Sequoia National Forest and Giant Sequoia National Monument through

volunteerism.

Support the ongoing efforts of the Giant Sequoia National Monument Association.

Develop new partnerships focused on management of the land (for example, tree planting, protection from

wildfire, education campaign to reduce trash in forest).

Build and enhance partnerships to protect tribal sites and interpret cultural assets.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

124

Appendix E-Partnership Strategy
Accomplishing these goals will require new and innovative methods as well asthe continuation of ongoing successful

partnership efforts. The purpose of this strategy is to outline an iterative process for building and sustaining a strong

partnership culture for the SQF and Monument. The strategy includes the following components: a method for

determining the SQF and Monument capacity for working in partnership; best practicesfor building new partnerships,

and: steps for ensuring effective outreach to nontraditional partners.

SQF and Monument Capacity for Working in Partnership

The National Partnership Office of the U.S. Forest Service has designed an assessment tool to help Forest Service

units assess, sustain, and improve their abilities to work with partners in continuing the Forest Service’s long history

of partnership and collaboration in land stewardship (see http://www.partnershipresourcecenter.org).

What is the Partnership Capacity Assessment Tool?

The Partnership Capacity Assessment Tool is essentially a group exercise to reflect on experiences and attitudes

about partnerships and collaboration. The tool asksthe group to score itself on a series of questions about partnership

opportunities, goals, resources, procedures, incentives, barriers, skills, and relationships. The group then uses these

scores to chart strengths, analyze positive and negative factors that contribute to partnership capacity, and identify

actions to sustain and grow capacity.

Who should use the Assessment Tool?

The Sequoia National Forest in conjunction with communities of place, interest, and culture who care about the

Giant Sequoia National Monument will benefit from the assessment. Thistool is designed to generate open dialogue

with partners and among staff. It is also a useful starting point for assessing current partnership abilities and

discussing how to maintain strengths or address needs.

How can the Assessment Tool best meet the needs of the Monument?

The Assessment Tool provides the format for a community forum to assess partnership needs and develop priorities

to meet those needs. Including partners in the process can help to promote dialogue and improve relationships.

However, the tool is not intended to assess the feasibility of or develop plans for specific partnership opportunities.

How long and where will the assessment take place?

The community forum can expect to complete the assessment in one evening session (3 to 4 hours). The investment

of time will pay off by helping SQF staff and potential partners to systematically identify needs and actions to meet

those needs. Trained facilitators and recorders will be used to keep the process moving smoothly.

Best Practices for Building New Partnerships

Partnerships can be thought of as a type of alliance, where the complex interaction of business and interpersonal

activities are essential to successfully achieving mutually beneficial goals. Key characteristics of successful

interpersonal relationships include trust, communication, perspective taking, rapport building, and commitment.

Partnerships are known to yield better results under certain conditions (Mockler 1999, O’Neill n.d., Appendix 2)

including:

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

125

Appendix E-Partnership Strategy
When each partner recognizes the need to have access to capabilities and competencies it cannot develop

internally; and

When a gradual approach is preferable in accessing resources, capabilities, and competencies (as opposed to

faster mechanisms such as contracting).

Keeping these conditions in mind, the following iterative best practices are provided to assist the SQF staff in the

identification of new Monument partners:

1. Place the partnership within the long-term strategies of the Monument

2. Define specific objectives of the partnership

3. Choose partners

4. Evaluate what to offer and what to receive in exchange

5. Define opportunities

6. Evaluate the impact on Monument stakeholders

7. Evaluate negotiating capabilities

8. Plan the integration

9. Create the partnership

1. Place the partnership within the long-term strategies of the Monument. Strategic alliances respond to

various long-term strategies of the Monument. For example, the Interpretive Plan for the Sequoia National

Forest and Giant Sequoia National Monument, published in 2008, established a strategy for the forest's

interpretive program, featuring the interpretation of the objects of interest, both natural and cultural. Interpretive

services may be provided on-site or virtually. The specific interpretive products,services, and delivery methods

are expected to evolve over time, in response to evolving technologies, visitor needs and demands, and

available resources. Partnerships are important in the provision of interpretation, not only because of the extra

resources they provide, but also because they help to enrich the information provided and help to develop a

sense of stewardship in both the partners and recipients of interpretive services.

2. Define specific objectives of the partnership. Three aspects of defining objectives are necessary for the

success of the partnership:

a. Asfor any strategy, the objective should be compared with the SQF and Monument’s available resources

and capabilities and with those that could be used. The partnership should bridge the gap of existing

resources and capabilitiesto achieve the objectives. The Assessment Tool can assist in identifying where

these gaps occur.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

126

Appendix E-Partnership Strategy
b. A clear consensus (internally) on why the Agency cannot reach particular goals on its own and why it

mustseek a partnership with an external organization rather than internal development or via procurement.

c. Knowing where the partnership generates advantages within the chain of value and clarifying why each

partner cannot develop these advantages internally.

3. Choose partners. According to Hill and Jones(1999), the right partner in an alliance must have three principal

features:

a. The partner must have the resources and capabilities to help the Monument achieve its strategic goals.

It must bring to the partnership what is missing from the others and which they are seeking.

b. The partner must share its long-term goals for the partnership. Failure is inevitable if the goals are

divergent.

c. The partner must not use the alliance to appropriate know-how, relationships with clients or suppliers,

or technology without making contributions of equal strategic weight. Alliances are longer lasting and

better when they are considered between partners with a reputation for trustworthiness.

4. Evaluate what to offer and what to receive in exchange. Reciprocity is a key component of building trust.

Each partner should evaluate which capabilities are critical to the partnership, and then decide what the

Monument can offer to the others and what it can expect from them.

5. Define opportunities. Knowing the value of the opportunities that can be achieved with the alliance is an

essential guide in negotiation and subsequent management of the partnership itself. Beyond the opportunities,

it is also important to examine the possible threats.

6. Evaluate the impact on Monument stakeholders. A key question to consider is, “How will stakeholders

react to the partnership?”

7. Evaluate negotiating capabilities. A key question to consider here is, “What resources and capabilities can

the partners realistically bring to the partnership?”

8. Plan the integration. A partnership “business plan” should:

a. Organize activities and functions

b. Define accounting procedures

c. Define procedures to resolve conflicts

d. Define the relationships between the partnership and the Monument

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

127

Appendix E-Partnership Strategy
9. Create the partnership. Flexibility is integral to sustaining an effective partnership. Whatever the form of

the partnership, some principles apply:

a. Each partner has its own goals that dictate the role of the partnership,

b. The role of the partnership changes as internal and external conditions evolve, and

c. The relationship between the partners is quite dynamic.

Steps for Ensuring Effective Outreach to Nontraditional Partners

The diversity of people using the Sequoia National Forest and Giant Sequoia National Monument will continue to

increase, asthe American population becomes more diverse and international visitorsincrease. The greatest growth

is projected to be in Hispanic and Asian populations, and their use is projected to increase dramatically in the next

25 years. Interpretation and outreach methods designed to connect nontraditional users to the Monument need to

communicate important resource issues, solicit commitment to conservation, and encourage appropriate behaviors.

Use of the Monument by nontraditional user groups, especially Hispanics and Asians, is prevalent and growing.

To assure effective outreach occurs within this growing segment of potential Monument partners, metrics should

be designed to monitor and evaluate success, adapting as necessary to continually broaden the circle of involvement.

The following steps may be considered, as appropriate, in developing innovative partnerships:

Translation of major documents (or summaries thereof), provision of translators at meetings, or other efforts

as appropriate to ensure that limited-English speakers gain understanding of potential partnership opportunities;

Provision of opportunitiesfor limited-English speakersto provide comments and actively engage in partnership

opportunities;

Provision of opportunities for public participation through means other than written communication, such as

personal interviews or use of audio or video recording devices to capture oral comments;

Use of different meeting sizes or formats, or variation on the type and number of media used, so that

communications are tailored to the particular community or population;

Use of locations and facilities that are local, convenient, and accessible to disabled individuals, low-income

and minority communities, and Indian tribes; and

Assistance to hearing-impaired or sight-impaired individuals when needed.

References

Hill G.; Jones, G. 1999. Strategic management. Houghton Mifflin.

Mockler, R.J. 1999. Multinational strategic alliances. Wiley.

O’Neill, B. n.d. Brian O’Neills’s 21 partnership success factors. San Francisco, CA: Golden Gate National Parks.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

128

Appendix E-Partnership Strategy
U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service, National Partnership Office. 2005. Partnership guide.

http://www.partnershipresourcecenter.org/resources/partnership-guide/. (21 December 2009).

U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Forest Service, National Partnership Office. 2004. Partnership capacity

assessment tool. Washington, DC.

Resources

http://www.partnershipresourcenter.org. This website provides online resources to build vibrant partnerships and

effective collaboration for the nation's forests, grasslands, and other special places. The website is a joint project

of the National Forest Foundation and the U.S. Forest Service.

Spanish Colonial Research Center, University of New Mexico. The Center was established by the National Park

Service in partnership with the university. The Center employs Spanish speakers from multiple Spanish-speaking

countries and regions to assist in translating English into Spanish. English is translated into Spanish so that it makes

sense to employees, and then it is back-translated into English to check that the original meaning is intact. Contact:

Jerry Gurule and other staff members at (505)346-2890; fax: (505)277-4603; e-mail: clahr@unm.edu.

Comments: 73

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

129

Appendix E-Partnership Strategy
Standards and guidelines are requirements that preclude or impose limitations on resource management activities

and are designed to be consistent with the objectives and desired conditions; they come into play as site-specific

activities are planned to implement the Monument Plan. The standards and guidelines act asthresholds or constraints

for management activities or practicesto ensure the protection of resources. They may apply to the entire Monument

or they may only apply to certain land allocations. The following standards and guidelines proposed for the Monument

are organized by resource area.

Table 32 Standards and Guidelines

Standard/Guideline

VEGETATION, INCLUDING GIANT SEQUOIA GROVES

For all projects that include a proposal for tree removal from within the Monument area, except for personal use

fuelwood, conduct an evaluation to document the clear need for removing trees for ecological restoration and

maintenance or public safety.

When implementing vegetation and fuels treatments, focus retention on conifer trees with a dbh of 20 inches or

greater in westside forest types. Retain montane hardwoods with a dbh of 12 inches or larger in westside forest

types. Occasional mortality of larger trees is expected to occur; however, design prescribed fire prescriptions and

techniques to minimize the loss of large trees and large down material.

Incidental removal of vegetation and down woody material for activitiessuch as administering special use permits;

maintaining recreation developments; constructing, reconstructing, and maintaining roads, trails, and rights of

way; expanding resorts based on approved development plans; and removing trees that present imminent safety

hazards may deviate from vegetation managementstandards and guidelines. Exceptionsto vegetation management

standards and guidelinesis acceptable for restoration activitiesto improve species composition and stand structure

and reduce species competition for resources.

Plant all regeneration areas requiring reforestation except where natural seeding is prescribed. Regeneration by

naturalseeding will be applied primarily in the true fir type and in areas where uneven-aged silvicultural practices

are prescribed.

Both natural and artificial regeneration shall be used as appropriate.

Save viable existing reproduction where feasible and incorporate into silvicultural prescriptions for new stands.

Utilize currentstate-of-the-art regeneration techniquesincluding controlling pests,such as gophers, and controlling

competing vegetation.

Make dead and down woody material available for firewood gathering.

In order to maintain forest diversity, particularly within the mixed conifer forest type, reforestation and timber

stand improvement prescriptions shall generally emulate existing species composition. Variation from this

guideline will be the exception and will be discussed in an environmental document. Commercial values will not

be the sole justification for increasing the proportion of high value species.

Design vegetation treatments to provide for edge corridors of cover and enhancement of special habitat features

such as meadows for wildlife.

Giant Sequoia Groves

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

130

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Ensure the maintenance and replacement of specimen trees so that their total number does not decrease through

time.

Include any naturally-occurring giant sequoia (1 foot or larger dbh) that is located within 500 feet of at least 3

other giant sequoias (each 1 foot or larger dbh) within a grove boundary.

There shall be no new road building, logging, or mechanized/motorized entry (except for entry on existing roads)

within the final administrative boundary of any grove, unless clearly needed for ecological restoration and

maintenance or public safety.

Create a "grove zone of influence" (ZOI) outside the administrative boundary of each grove, based on watershed

boundaries and other topographical features, to protect groves from damaging effects.

Adjacent groves are to be managed as if they are one large grove or grove complex. The grove boundaries will

be a single line around the outermost giant sequoia trees in the complex of groves.

Restrict mechanical entry and logging within grove administrative boundaries. The following mechanical/motorized

uses will be permitted within the grove boundary line: a) use of existing roads, b) management in accordance

with approved fuel load reduction plans, and only where clearly needed for ecological restoration and maintenance

or public safety, c) use of light equipment to build and/or maintain trails, d) use of equipment to fight wildfires

(use of heavy equipment off of existing roads will require Forest Supervisor approval), and e) use of

battery-operated wheelchairs (MSA, pages 7-8). In Indian Basin Grove, there will be no logging except for safety

reasons in and near the Princess Campground area south and east of Highway 180.

Sugar Pine

Silvicultural prescriptions are to consider means of maintaining the widest possible base of sugar pine genes.

Generally, this means protecting as many sugar pine trees as possible while meeting land management plan

objectives and being compatible with timber harvest and related activities. Current direction regarding sugar pine

retention is set forth in appendix 3 .

Continue to plant a modest mix (5-10 percent) of sugar pine along with other mixed conifer species even though

major gene resistant stock is not now available. This may mean collecting seed from non-tested trees in order to

maintain a sugar pine seedbank. With resistant stock this percentage could be increased.

Intensify the effort to collect sample cones from candidate resistant trees. This is high priority.

Continue to protect trees that are known to carry resistance. Collect seed from these trees for our seedbank.

Young Stands, Including Plantations

In young stands of trees, apply the necessary silvicultural and fuels reduction treatments to: (a) accelerate the

development of old forest characteristics, (b) increase stand heterogeneity, (c) promote hardwoods, and (d) reduce

risk of loss to wildland fire. Use mechanical fuels treatments to remove the material necessary to achieve the

following outcomesif the treated plantation wasto burn under 90th percentile fire weather conditions: (a) wildland

fire would burn with average flame lengths of 2 to 4 feet, (b) the rate of fire spread would be less than 50 percent

of the pre-treatment rate of spread, and (c) fireline production rates would be doubled. Achieve these outcomes

by reducing surface and ladder fuels and adjacent crown fuels. Treatments should be effective for more than 5

years.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

131

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Hardwood Ecosystems

During or prior to landscape analysis,spatially determine distributions of existing and potential natural hardwood

ecosystems (Forest Service Handbook 2090.11). Identify hardwood restoration and enhancement projects.

Manage hardwood ecosystems for a diversity of hardwood tree size classes such that seedlings, saplings, and

pole-sized trees are sufficiently abundant to replace large trees that die and maintain mast production.

Where possible, create openings around existing California black oaks and canyon live oaks to stimulate natural

regeneration.

Retain the mix of mast-producing species where they exist within a stand.

Retain all blue oak and valley oak trees except where: (a) stand restoration strategies call for tree removal; (b)

trees are lost to fire; or (c) tree removal is needed for public health and safety.

When planning prescribed fire or mechanical treatmentsin hardwood ecosystems: (a) consider the risk of noxious

weed spread and (b) minimize impacts to hardwood ecosystem structure and biodiversity.

FIRE AND FUELS

In wilderness, use naturally ignited wildfiresto meet managementstrategies when fuel loading and natural barriers

will limit the final fire perimeter to a planned boundary under the most severe weather conditions.

Incorporate fuel treatment and protection planning into reforestation plans. Ensure that tree stocking levels and

silvicultural goals are consistent with fuel reduction objectives in plantations located in high and moderate fire

hazard and risk areas.

The structural change to treatment acres by mechanical methods is limited to one per decade. Treatments should

be designed to be effective for at least 10 years. When subsequent entries within 10 years are needed to reduce

surface fuels, prescribed fire is the preferred method. When burning opportunities are limited, mechanical

treatments, such as mastication and piling, are allowed.

Lightning-caused fires can be used to reduce fuel loads or to provide other resource benefits, such as conserving

populations of fire-dependent species.

Strategically place fuel treatments acrossthe landscape to achieve fuel conditionsthat reduce the size and severity

of wildland fires. Maintain 30 to 40 percent of each landscape (outside the defense zone of the wildland urban

intermix zone) in a condition that meets fuel management objectives.

Locate fuel treatments to interrupt wildland fire spread and reduce fire severity. Typically, locate treatment areas

on the upper two-thirds of the slope, on south and west aspects, in mid- and lower- elevation vegetation types.

Conduct fuel treatments in areas of high fire hazard and risk with human safety and the wildland urban intermix

zones as the first priority.

For prescribed fire treatments, use multiple entries, as needed, to achieve fuels management objectives, up to two

burns per decade and four burns over 20 years.

When planning prescribed fire or mechanical treatmentsin hardwood ecosystems: (a) consider the risk of noxious

weed spread and (b) minimize impacts to hardwood ecosystem structure and biodiversity.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

132

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Lightning-caused fires can be used to reduce fuel loads or to provide other resource benefits, such as conserving

populations of fire-dependent species.

Meet at least once annually with cooperating agencies to coordinate prescribed burning plans for projects located

on adjacent lands and to coordinate fire protection activities.

Defense Zone of the WUI

Design mechanical fuel treatments to remove the material necessary to achieve the following outcomes: (a) On

more than 90 percent of the stand area, achieve an average flame length of 4 feet or less if the stand was to burn

under 90th percentile fire weather conditions; (b) On stands with less than 40 percent canopy cover, achieve an

average live crown base height of 15 feet; 40 to 70 percent canopy cover, achieve an average live crown base

height of 20 feet; and greater than 70 percent canopy cover, achieve an average live crown base height of 25 feet.

To enhance stand heterogeneity, do not mechanically treat the remaining 10 percent of the stand area.

Achieve the fuels outcomes described above through thinning from below to remove surface and ladder fuels.

Threat Zone of the WUI

Design mechanical fuel treatments to remove the material necessary to achieve the following outcomes: (a) On

more than 85 percent of the stand area, achieve an average flame length of 6 feet or less if the stand was to burn

under 90th percentile fire weather conditions; (b) On stands with less than 40 percent canopy cover, achieve an

average live crown base height of 15 feet; 40 to 70 percent canopy cover, achieve an average live crown base

height of 20 feet; and greater than 70 percent canopy cover, achieve an average live crown base height of 25 feet.

To enhance stand heterogeneity, do not mechanically treat the remaining 15 percent of the stand area.

Design mechanical treatments to achieve the fuels outcomes described above through understory thinning to

remove surface and ladder fuels up to 20 inches dbh. Focus treatments on removing suppressed and intermediate

trees. Apply treatmentsto enhance stand heterogeneity. When conducting treatmentsin dense stands with uniform

tree size and spacing, introduce heterogeneity into such stands by creating small (typically less than 1 acre),

irregularly spaced openings. Canopy cover reductions may be needed to meet fuels objectives, but do not exceed

a 20 percent reduction in the dominant and co-dominate trees. For example, a stand’s canopy cover may be

reduced from a pre-treatment level of 70 percent down to 50 percent to meet fuels objectives.

In westside forest types, where pre-treatment canopy cover is between 50 and 59 percent, design mechanical

treatments to retain a minimum of 50 percent canopy cover in dominant and co-dominant trees. In stands that

currently have between 40 and 50 percent canopy cover, do not reduce canopy cover except where canopy cover

reductions result from removing primarily shade-tolerant trees less than 6 inches dbh.

For prescribed fire treatments, use multiple entries, as needed, to achieve fuels management objectives, up to two

burns per decade and four burns over 20 years.

General Monument(1)

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

133

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Design mechanical fuel treatments to remove the material necessary to achieve the following outcomes: (a) On

more than 75 percent of the stand area, achieve an average flame length of 6 feet or less if the stand was to burn

under 90th percentile fire weather conditions; (b) On stands with less than 40 percent canopy cover, achieve an

average live crown base height of 15 feet; 40 to 70 percent canopy cover, achieve an average live crown base

height of 20 feet; and greater than 70 percent canopy cover, achieve an average live crown base height of 25 feet.

To enhance stand heterogeneity, do not mechanically treat the remaining 25 percent of the stand area.

Design mechanical treatments to achieve the fuels outcomes described above through understory thinning to

remove surface and ladder fuels up to 20 inches dbh. Focus treatments on removing suppressed and intermediate

conifer trees.

Forested Stands of Large Trees with Moderate to Dense Canopy Cover

Design mechanical fuel treatments to remove the material necessary to achieve the following outcomes:

On over 75 percent of the stand area achieve an average flame length of 6 feet or less if the stand was to

burn under 90th percentile fire weather conditions.

Stands with less than 40 percent canopy cover, achieve an average live crown base height of 15 feet.

Stands with 40 to 70 percent canopy cover, achieve an average live crown base height of 20 feet.

Stands with greater than 70 percent canopy cover, achieve an average live crown base height of 25 feet.

To enhance stand heterogeneity and to maintain intact biological processes, particularly soil biota that may be

affected by mechanical treatments, do not mechanically treat the remaining 25 percent of the stand area.

Where mechanical treatments are necessary, design treatmentsto achieve or approach the fuels outcomes described

above by reducing surface and ladder fuels less than 12 inches dbh. Apply treatments to enhance stand

heterogeneity. Allow incidental felling of trees between 12 and 20 inches dbh where required for operability.

Retain felled trees on the ground, where needed, to achieve down woody material standards of 10 to 20 tons per

acre in logs greater than 12 inches diameter at midpoint.

Do not reduce canopy cover in dominant and co-dominant trees by more than 10 percent across a stand following

mechanical treatments. (For example, if canopy cover in a stand’s dominant and co-dominant trees is 80 percent,

retain at least 70 percent canopy cover in dominant and co-dominant trees following mechanical treatment.) .

In westside forest types, where pre-treatment canopy cover is between 50 and 59 percent, design mechanical

treatments to retain a minimum of 50 percent canopy cover in dominant and co-dominant trees. Do not reduce

canopy cover in stands that currently have between 40 and 50 percent canopy cover, except where canopy cover

reductionsresult from removing shade-tolerant treeslessthan 6 inches dbh. In the eastside pine forest type, retain

a minimum of 30 percent canopy cover.

Give priority to restoring historic fire return intervals where possible. Emphasize fire restoration in pine and

mixed-conifer forests. In mixed-conifer forests, fire return intervals vary by aspect and topographic position, with

most frequent burning on south- and west-facing aspects.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

134

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Emphasize fuel treatments in stands at lower elevations with high fire hazard in the pine, mixed conifer, eastside

pine, and eastside mixed conifer forest types. Emphasize fuel treatments on the upper two-thirds of south- and

west-facing aspects near roads. Use mechanical treatments where fire managers determine a high potential for:

(a) prescribed fire escape due to excessive fuel accumulations; (b) unacceptable smoke impacts; or (c) canopy

cover and old forest structure loss due to excessive surface and ladder fuels.

Shrubfields

Design treatmentsin brush and shrub patchesto remove the material necessary to achieve the following outcomes

from wildland fire under 90th percentile fire weather conditions: (a) wildland fires would burn with an average

flame length of 8 feet or less; (b) the fire’s rate of spread would be less than 50 percent of the pre-treatment rate

of spread; and (c) fireline production rates would be doubled. Treatments should be effective for more than 5

years.

AIR QUALITY

Continue the visibility monitoring program and determine sensitive indicators for each air quality-related value

in national forest class I areas. Protect air quality-related values by reviewing all projects and management

activities that may impact those values. Review external prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) source

applications and make recommendations to permitting authorities.

Minimize resource and air quality impacts from air pollutants generated by management activities through use

of the following control measures:

1. Follow dust abatement procedures.

2. Conduct an air quality analysis for all projects that may impair air quality to determine impacts, mitigations,

and/or controls.

3. Respond to local planning and regulatory authorities when development outside forest jurisdiction may

impact forest resources.

4. Conduct prescribed burning activities in accordance with air pollution control district regulations and with

proper prescriptions to assure good smoke management.

5. Notify the public before burning.

Minimize smoke emissions by following best available control measures(BACMs). Avoid burning on high visitor

days. Notify the public before burning.

Use the following documents for guidance and direction for smoke management and air quality protection: (1)

Interim Air Quality Policy on Wildland and Prescribed Fires, announced by the Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA) in 1998; (2) Memorandum of Understanding between the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and

the Forest Service, signed on July 13, 1999; (3) Smoke Management Guidelines for Agricultural and Prescribed

Burning under Title 17, currently being revised by CARB; and (4) the Nevada Smoke Management Plan.

Coordinate and cooperate with other agencies and the public to manage air quality. Conduct prescribed burns

when conditions for smoke dispersal are favorable, especially away from sensitive or class I areas. Use smoke

modeling tools to predict smoke dispersion.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

135

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

WILDLIFE AND PLANT HABITAT

(2)

Retain the following numbers of large snags after fuels treatments except where: (1) snag removal is needed to

address imminent safety hazards, and (2) snag levels are reduced as a result of incidental loss to prescribed fire.

In westside mixed conifer and ponderosa pine forest types, retain four of the largest snags per acre. In the red fir

forest type, retain six of the largest snags per acre. In Westside hardwood ecosystems, retain four of the largest

snags (hardwood or conifer) per acre. Where standing live hardwood trees lack dead branches, retain six of the

largest snags per acre, where they exist, to supplement wildlife needs for dead material. Use snags larger than 15

inches dbh to meet this standard. Evaluate snag density on a 10-acre basis. The defense zone of the wildland

urban intermix zone and developed recreation sites are exempt from this standard and guideline.

Following stand-replacing events(as a result of wildland fire, insects, or diseases), do not conductsalvage harvest

in at least 10 percent of the total area affected by the stand-replacing event. This unsalvaged acreage should be

comprised of stands classified as California wildlife habitat relationship (CWHR) size class 5 or 6 (average dbh

of overstory trees [snags] greater than 24 inches). As needed, use stands classified as CWHR size class 4 (average

dbh of overstory trees[snags] between 11 and 24 inches) to reach the 10-percent level. Thisstandard and guideline

does not apply to the defense zone of the wildland urban intermix zone.

Retain approximately 132 cubic feet per acre of well-dispersed down logs. Ideal log size is 20 inches in diameter

and 20 feet in length.

Fall and remove hazard trees along maintenance level 3, 4, and 5 roads and within or immediately adjacent (tree

falling distance) to administrative sites. Review by an appropriate resource specialist is required prior to falling

hazard trees along maintenance level 1 and 2 roads. Retain felled trees, where needed, to meet down woody

material standards.

1. The 2001 SNFPA called this land allocation General Forest. In this draft EIS, this allocation will be called General

Monument.

2. Including OldForest Habitat; CaliforniaSpotted Owl; Northern Goshawk; Great Gray Owl; Wolverine andSierra Nevada

Red Fox; Furbearers (Fisher and Marten); Willow Flycatcher; Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Plants; Invasive

Nonnative Species; and Botanical Resources.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

136

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Old Forest Habitat

Minimize old forest habitat fragmentation. Assess potential impacts of fragmentation on old forest associated

species (particularly fisher and marten) in biological evaluations. Evaluate locations of new landings, staging

areas, and recreational developments, including trails and other disturbances.

Assess the potential impact of projects on the connectivity of habitat for old forest associated species.

Consider forested linkages (with canopy cover greater than 40 percent) that are interconnected via riparian areas

and ridgetop saddles during landscape-level and project-level analysis.

During landscape analysis, identify areas for acquisition, exchange, or conservation easements to enhance

connectivity of habitat for old forest associated species. Assign a priority order for these areas.

California Spotted Owl

Delineate California spotted owl protected activity centers(PACs)surrounding each territorial owl activity center

detected on National Forest System lands since 1986. Owl PACs are designated for all territorial owls based on:

(1) the most recent documented nest site, (2) the most recent known roost site when a nest location remains

unknown, and (3) a central point based on repeated daytime detections when neither nest or roost locations are

known.

Delineate PACs to: (1) include known and suspected nest stands and (2) encompass the best available 300 acres

of habitat in as compact a unit as possible. Select the best available habitat for PACs to incorporate: (1) two or

more tree canopy layers; (2) trees in the dominant and co-dominant crown classes averaging 24 inches dbh or

greater; (3) at least 70 percent tree canopy cover (including hardwoods); and (4) in descending order of priority,

CWHR classes 6, 5D, 5M, 4D, and 4M and other stands with at least 50 percent canopy cover (including

hardwoods). Use aerial photography interpretation and field verification, as needed, to delineate PACs.

As additional nest location and habitat data become available, review boundaries of PACs and make adjustments

as necessary to better include known and suspected nest stands and to encompass the best available 300 acres of

habitat.

When activities are planned adjacent to non-national forest lands, check available databases for the presence of

nearby California spotted owl activity centers on non-national forest lands. Delineate a 300-acre circular area

centered on the activity center. Designate and manage any part of the circular 300-acre area that lies on national

forest lands as a California spotted owl PAC.

Prior to undertaking vegetation treatments in suitable California spotted owl habitat with unknown occupancy,

conduct surveys in accordance with Pacific Southwest Region survey protocol. Designate California spotted owl

protected activity centers (PACs) where appropriate based on survey results.

When activities are planned within or adjacent to a PAC and the location of the nest site or activity center is

uncertain, conduct surveys to establish or confirm the location of the nest or activity center.

Maintain PACs regardless of California spotted owl occupancy status, unless habitat is rendered unsuitable by a

catastrophic stand-replacing event and surveys conducted to protocol confirm non-occupancy.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

137

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Maintain a limited operating period (LOP), prohibiting activities within approximately 1⁄4 mile of the nest site

during the breeding season (March 1 through August 31) unless surveys confirm that California spotted owls are

not nesting. The LOP does not apply to existing road and trail use and maintenance or continuing recreation use,

except where analysis of proposed projects or activities determines that either existing or proposed activities are

likely to result in nest disturbance.

The LOP may be waived for individual projects or activities of limited scope and duration or when a biological

evaluation documents that such projects are unlikely to result in breeding disturbance considering their intensity,

duration, timing, and specific location. Where a biological evaluation determines that a nest site will be shielded

from planned activities by topographic features that minimize disturbance, the LOP buffer distance may be

reduced.

The LOP may be waived, where necessary, to allow for early season prescribed burning in up to 5 percent of the

California spotted owl PACs on a national forest per year.

The LOP may be modified or waived to assessthe effects of prescribed fire and mechanical treatments on breeding

owls as a formal adaptive management study developed in cooperation with the Pacific Southwest Research

Station.

In PACs located outside the defense zone of the wildland urban intermix zone:Limit stand-altering activities to

reducing surface and ladder fuels through prescribed fire treatments. In forested stands with overstory trees 11

inches dbh and greater, design prescribed fire treatments that have an average flame length of 4 feet or less.

Prior to burning, conduct hand treatments, including handline construction, tree pruning, and cutting of small

trees (less than 6 inches dbh), within a 1- to 2-acre area surrounding known nest trees, as needed, to protect nest

trees and trees in their immediate vicinity.

In PACs located inside the defense zone of the wildland urban intermix zone:Prohibit mechanical treatments

within a 500-footradius buffer around the California spotted owl activity center. Allow prescribed burning within

the 500-foot radius buffer. Prior to burning, conduct hand treatments, including handline construction, tree

pruning, and cutting of small trees (less than 6 inches dbh), within a 1- to 2-acre area surrounding known nest

trees, as needed, to protect nest trees and trees in their immediate vicinity. The remaining area of the PAC may

be mechanically treated to achieve the fuels reduction outcomes described for the general forest land allocation.

Evaluate proposals for new roads, trails, off-highway vehicle routes, and recreational and other developments

for their potential to disturb nest sites. Mitigate impacts where there is documented evidence of disturbance to

the nest site from existing recreation, off-highway vehicle route, trail, and road uses (including road maintenance).

Establish a home range core area surrounding each territorial spotted owl activity center detected after 1986.

Home range core area size is 600 acres on the Sequoia National Forest.

Use aerial photography to delineate California spotted owl home range core areas. Identify acreage for the entire

core area on national forest lands. Delineate core areas to encompass the best available California spotted owl

habitat in the closest proximity to the owl activity center. Select the best available contiguous habitat to incorporate:

(1) two or more tree canopy layers; (2) trees in the dominant and co-dominant crown classes averaging 24 inches

dbh or greater; and (3) in descending order of priority, CWHR classes 6, 5D, 5M, 4D and 4M and other stands

with at least 50 percent tree canopy cover (including hardwoods). The acreage in the 300-acre PAC counts toward

the total home range core area. Delineate core areas within 1.5 miles of the activity center.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

138

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

When activities are planned adjacent to non-national forest lands, delineate circular core areas around California

spotted owl activity centers on non-national forest lands. Using the best available habitat as described above,

designate and manage any part of the circular core area that lies on national forest lands as a California spotted

owl home range core area.

Fuel treatment standards and guidelines for California spotted owl home range core areas are identical to those

presented for old forest emphasis areas above, except for the wildland urban intermix.

Northern Goshawk

Delineate northern goshawk protected activity centers (PACs) surrounding all known and newly discovered

breeding territories detected on National Forest System lands. Designate northern goshawk PACs based upon

the latest documented nest site and location(s) of alternate nests. If the actual nest site is not located, designate

the PAC based on the location of territorial adult birds or recently fledged juvenile goshawks during the fledgling

dependency period.

Delineate PACs to: (1) include known and suspected nest stands and (2) encompass the best available 200 acres

of forested habitat in the largest contiguous patches possible, based on aerial photography. Where suitable nesting

habitat occurs in small patches, define PACs as multiple blocks in the largest best available patches within 0.5

miles of one another. Best available forested stands for PACs have the following characteristics: (1) trees in the

dominant and co-dominant crown classes average 24 inches dbh or greater; (2) in westside conifer and eastside

mixed-conifer forest types, stands have at least 70 percent tree canopy cover. Non-forest vegetation (such as

brush and meadows) should not be counted as part of the 200 acres.

As additional nest location and habitat data become available, review boundaries of PACs and make adjustments,

as necessary, to better include known and suspected nest stands and to encompass the best available 200 acres

of forested habitat.

When activities are planned adjacent to non-national forest lands, check available databases for the presence of

nearby northern goshawk activity centers on non-national forest lands. Delineate a 200-acre circular area centered

on the activity center. Designate and manage any part of the circular 200-acre area that lies on national forest

lands as a northern goshawk PAC.

Prior to undertaking vegetation treatments in suitable northern goshawk nesting habitat that is not within an

existing California spotted owl or northern goshawk PAC, conduct surveys using Pacific Southwest Region

survey protocols. Suitable northern goshawk nesting habitat is defined as follows: stands with an average tree

size of 11 inches dbh or greater and at least 40 percent canopy cover.

When activities are planned within or adjacent to a PAC and the location of the nest site or activity center is

uncertain, conduct surveys to establish or confirm the location of the nest or activity center.

Maintain PACs regardless of northern goshawk occupancy status, unless habitat is rendered unsuitable by a

catastrophic stand-replacing event and surveys conducted to protocol confirm non-occupancy.

Maintain a limited operating period (LOP), prohibiting activities within approximately 1⁄4 mile of the nest site

during the breeding season (February 15 through September 15) unless surveys confirm that northern goshawks

are not nesting. If the nest stand is unknown, either apply the LOP to a 1⁄4-mile area surrounding the PAC or

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

139

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

survey to determine the neststand location. The LOP does not apply to existing road and trail use and maintenance

or continuing recreation use, except where analysis of proposed projects or activities determinesthat either existing

or proposed activities are likely to result in nest disturbance.

The LOP may be waived for individual projects or activities of limited scope and duration or when a biological

evaluation documents that such projects are unlikely to result in breeding disturbance considering their intensity,

duration, timing, and specific location. Where a biological evaluation determines that a nest site will be shielded

from planned activities by topographic features that minimize disturbance, the LOP buffer distance may be

reduced.

The LOP may be waived, where necessary, to allow for early season prescribed burning in up to 5 percent of the

northern goshawk PACs on a national forest per year.

Evaluate proposals for new roads, trails, off-highway vehicle routes, and recreational and other developments

for their potential to disturb nest sites. Mitigate impacts where there is documented evidence of disturbance to

the nest site from existing recreation, off-highway vehicle route, trail, and road uses (including road maintenance).

In PACs located outside the defense zone of the wildland urban intermix zone: Limit stand-altering activities to

reducing surface and ladder fuels through prescribed fire treatments. In forested stands with overstory trees 11

inches dbh and greater, design prescribed fire treatments that have an average flame length of 4 feet or less. Prior

to burning, conduct hand treatments, including handline construction, tree pruning, and cutting of small trees

(less than 6 inches dbh), within a 1- to 2-acre area surrounding known nest trees, as needed, to protect nest trees

and trees in their immediate vicinity.

In PACs located inside the defense zone of the wildland urban intermix zone: Prohibit mechanical treatments

within a 500-foot radius buffer around nest trees. Allow prescribed burning within the 500-foot radius buffer.

Prior to burning, conduct hand treatments, including handline construction, tree pruning, and cutting of small

trees (less than 6 inches dbh), within a 1- to 2-acre area surrounding known nest trees, as needed, to protect nest

trees and trees in their immediate vicinity. The remaining area of the PAC may be mechanically treated to achieve

the fuels reduction outcomes described for the general forest land allocation.

Great Gray Owl

Establish and maintain a protected activity center (PAC) that includes the forested area and adjacent meadow

around all known great gray owl nest stands. Delineate at least 50 acres of the highest quality nesting habitat

(CWHR types 6, 5D, and 5M) available in the forested area surrounding the nest. Also include the meadow or

meadow complex that supports the prey base for nesting owls.

Conduct additional surveys to established protocols to follow up reliable sightings of great gray owls.

Apply a limited operating period (LOP), prohibiting vegetation management activities and road construction

within 1⁄4 mile of active great gray owl nest stands during the nesting period (typically March 1 to August 15).

The LOP does not apply to: (1) existing road traffic and road maintenance, (2) trail uses, and (3) other recreational

uses and activities, unless a biological evaluation documents that these activities will result in nest disturbance.

The LOP may also be waived for projects of limited scope and duration.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

140

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Evaluate proposals for new roads, trails, off-highway vehicle routes, and recreational and other developments

for their potential to disturb nest sites. Mitigate impacts where there is documented evidence of disturbance to

the nest site from existing recreation, off-highway vehicle route, trail, and road uses (including road maintenance).

In meadow areas of great gray owl PACs, maintain herbaceous vegetation at a height commensurate with site

capability and habitat needs of prey species. Follow regional guidance to determine potential prey species and

associated habitat requirements at the project level.

Wolverine and Sierra Nevada Red Fox

Upon detection (photograph, track plate, or sighting verified by a wildlife biologist) of a wolverine or Sierra

Nevada red fox, conduct an analysis to determine if activities within 5 miles of the detection have a potential to

affect the species. For a 2-year period following the detection, restrict activitiesthat are determined in the analysis

to have an adverse impact from January 1 to June 30.

Pacific Fisher

Assess the impact of vegetation management on Pacific fisher habitat using models appropriate for the scale of

the project.

Because the effects of prescribed fire on key components of fisher habitat are uncertain, give preference to

mechanical treatments over prescribed fire. However, prescribed fire may be applied to achieve restoration and

regeneration objectives for fire-adapted giant sequoia.

In areas outside the wildland urban intermix zone, manage each planning watershed to support fisher habitat

requirements. Retain 60 percent of each 5,000- to 10,000-acre watershed in CWHR size class 4 (average dbh of

overstory trees between 11 and 24 inches) or greater and canopy cover greater than or equal to 60 percent.

Prior to vegetation treatments, identify important wildlife structures, such as large diameter snags and coarse

woody material within the treatment unit. For prescribed fire treatments, use firing patterns, fire lines around

snags and large logs, and other techniques to minimize effects on snags and large logs. Evaluate the effectiveness

of these mitigation measures after treatment.

Fisher den sites are 700-acre buffers consisting of the highest quality habitat (CWHR size class 4 or greater and

canopy cover greater than 60 percent) in a compact arrangement surrounding verified fisher birthing and kit

rearing dens in the largest, most contiguous blocks available.

Protect fisher den site buffers from disturbance with a limited operating period (LOP) from March 1 through June

30 for all new projects as long as habitat remains suitable or until another regionally approved management

strategy is implemented. The LOP may be waived for individual projects of limited scope and duration, when a

biological evaluation documents that such projects are unlikely to result in breeding disturbance considering their

intensity, duration, timing, and specific location.

Evaluate the appropriateness of LOPs for existing uses in fisher den site buffers during environmental analysis.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

141

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Avoid fuel treatments in den site buffers to the extent possible. If areas within den site buffers must be treated to

achieve fuels objectives for the wildland urban intermix zone, limit treatments to mechanical clearing of fuels.

Treat ladder and surface fuels over 85 percent of the treatment unit to achieve fuels objectives. Use piling or

mastication to treat surface fuels during initial treatment. Burning of piled debris is allowed. Prescribed fire may

be used to treat fuels if no other reasonable alternative exists.

Evaluate proposals for new roads, trails, off-highway vehicle routes, and recreational and other developments

for their potential to disturb den sites. Mitigate impacts where there is documented evidence of disturbance to

the den site from existing recreation, off-highway vehicle route, trail, and road uses (including road maintenance).

Marten

Marten den sites are 100-acre buffers consisting of the highest quality habitat in a compact arrangementsurrounding

the den site. CWHR Types 6, 5D, 5M, 4D, and 4M in descending order of priority, based on availability, provide

highest quality habitat for the marten.

Protect marten den site buffers from disturbance with a limited operating period (LOP) from May 1 through July

31 for all new projects as long as habitat remains suitable or until another regionally approved management

strategy is implemented.

Evaluate the appropriateness of LOPs for existing uses in marten den site buffers during environmental analysis.

Avoid fuel treatments in marten den site buffers to the extent possible. If areas within den site buffers must be

treated to achieve fuels objectives for the wildland urban intermix zone, limit treatments to mechanical clearing

of fuels. Treat ladder and surface fuels over 85 percent of the treatment unit to achieve fuels objectives. Use piling

or mastication to treat surface fuels during initial treatment. Burning of piled debris is allowed. Prescribed fire

may be used to treat fuels if no other reasonable alternative exists.

Evaluate proposals for new roads, trails, off-highway vehicle routes, and recreational and other developments

for their potential to disturb den sites. Mitigate impacts where there is documented evidence of disturbance to

the den site from existing recreation, off-highway vehicle route, trail, and road uses (including road maintenance).

Willow Flycatcher

Evaluate proposals for new concentrated stock areas (for example, livestock handling and management facilities,

pack stations, equestrian stations, and corrals) located within 5 miles of occupied willow flycatcher sites.

As part of landscape analysis, give priority to meadow restoration opportunities near or adjacent to known willow

flycatcher sites.

To the extent possible, construct no new roads in potential willow flycatcher habitat. Potential willow flycatcher

habitat includes: (1) occupied willow flycatcher habitat, (2) known willow flycatcher sites, (3) emphasis habitat

[meadows larger than 15 acres that have standing water on June 1 and a deciduous shrub component], and (4)

small, wet woody meadows (meadows less than 15 acres that have standing water on June 1 and a deciduous

shrub component.

Continue a 4-year cycle for conducting willow flycatcher surveys in all five known willow flycatcher sites in the

Monument.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

142

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

In meadows with occupied willow flycatcher sites, allow only late-season grazing (after August 15) in the entire

meadow.

This standard and guideline may be waived if an interdisciplinary team has developed a site-specific meadow

management strategy. This strategy is to be developed and implemented in partnership with the affected grazing

permittee. The strategy objectives must focus on protecting the nest site and associated habitat during the breeding

season and the long-term sustainability of suitable habitat at breeding sites. It may use a mix of management

tools, including grazing systems, structural improvements, and other exclusion by management techniques to

protect willow flycatcher habitat.

In willow flycatchersitesreceiving late season grazing, monitor utilization annually using regional range analysis

and planning guide. Monitor willow flycatcher habitat every 3 years using the following criteria: rooting depth

cores for meadow condition, point intercepts for shrub foliar density, and strip transects for shrub recruitment

and cover. Meadow condition assessments will be included in a GIS meadow coverage. If habitat conditions are

not supporting the willow flycatcher or trend downward, modify or suspend grazing.

For historically occupied willow flycatcher sites, assess willow flycatcher habitat suitability within the meadow.

If habitat is degraded, develop restoration objectives and take appropriate actions (such as physical restoration

of hydrological components, limiting or re-directing grazing activity and so forth) to move the meadow toward

desired conditions.

Evaluate site condition of historically occupied willow flycatcher sites. Those sites that no longer contain

standing water on June 1 and a deciduous shrub component and cannot be reasonably restored may be removed

from the willow flycatcher site database.

As part of the project planning process, survey emphasis habitat within 5 miles of occupied willow flycatcher

sites to determine willow flycatcher occupancy. Emphasis habitat is defined as meadows larger than 15 acres that

have standing water on June 1 and a deciduous shrub component. Use established protocols to conduct these

surveys. If these surveys determine willow flycatcher occupancy, add these to the database of occupied willow

flycatcher sites and include them in the 4-year survey cycle of willow flycatcher sites described above.

Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Plants

Prohibit or mitigate ground-disturbing activities that negatively affect hydrologic processes that maintain water

flow, water quality, or temperature critical to sustaining fen ecosystems and the plant species dependent on them.

During project analysis, survey, map and protect fens from activities such as trampling by livestock, pack stock,

humans, and wheeled vehicles. Criteria for defining fens include, but are not limited to, presence of sphagnum

moss (Sphagnum spp.), presence of mosses in the genus Meesia, or presence of sundew (Drosera ssp.). Complete

initial inventories of fens within active grazing allotments prior to re-issuing permits.

Conduct field surveys for threatened, endangered, proposed, and sensitive (TEPS) plant species early enough in

the project planning process so that the project can be designed to conserve or enhance TEPS plants and their

habitat. Conduct surveys according to procedures outlined in the Forest Service Handbook (FSH 2609.25.11). If

additional field surveys are conducted as part of project implementation, document the survey resultsin the project

file.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

143

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Invasive Nonnative Species

Follow Forest Service Manual (FSM 2080) direction pertaining to integrated weed management when planning

weed control projects.

Inform forest users, local agencies, special use permittees, groups, and organizations in communities near national

forests about noxious weed prevention and management.

Work cooperatively with California and Nevada state agencies and individual counties (for example, cooperative

weed management areas) to: (1) prevent the introduction and establishment of noxious weed infestations and (2)

control existing infestations.

As part of project planning, conduct a noxious weed risk assessment to determine risks for weed spread (high,

moderate, or low) associated with different types of proposed management activities. Refer to weed prevention

practices in the Regional Noxious Weed Management Strategy to develop mitigation measures for high and

moderate risk activities.

When prescribed in project-level noxious weed risk assessments, require off-road equipment and vehicles (both

Forest Service and contracted) used for project implementation to be weed free. Refer to weed prevention practices

in the Regional Noxious Weed Strategy.

Minimize weed spread by incorporating weed prevention and control measures into ongoing management or

maintenance activities that involve ground disturbance or the possibility of spreading weeds. Refer to weed

prevention practices in the Regional Noxious Weed Strategy.

Conduct follow-up inspections of ground-disturbing activitiesto ensure adherence to the Regional Noxious Weed

Strategy.

Encourage use of certified weed free hay and straw. Cooperate with other agencies and the public in developing

a certification program for weed free hay and straw. Phase in the program as certified weed free hay and straw

becomes available. This standard and guideline applies to pack and saddle stock used by the public, livestock

permittees, outfitter guide permittees, and local, state, and federal agencies.

Include weed prevention measures, as necessary, when amending or re-issuing permits (including, but not limited

to, livestock grazing, special uses, and pack stock operator permits).

Include weed prevention measures and weed control treatments in mining plans of operation and reclamation

plans. Refer to weed prevention practices in the Regional Noxious Weed Strategy. Monitor for weeds, as

appropriate, for 2 years after project implementation (assuming no weed introductions have occurred).

Conduct a risk analysisfor weed spread associated with burned area emergency rehabilitation (BAER) treatments.

The BAER team is responsible for conducting this analysis. Monitor and treat weed infestations for 3 years after

the fire.

During landscape analysis or project-level planning, consider restoring or revegetating degraded ecosystems to

minimize the potential for noxious weed reinfestations. Adhere to regional native plant policies for revegetation

(USDA 2008. FSM Chapter 2070).

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

144

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Consult with American Indians to determine priority areas for weed prevention and control where traditional

gathering areas are threatened by weed infestations.

Complete noxious weed inventories, based on a regional protocol, within 3 years of the signing of the record of

decision for the Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment Project. Review and update these inventories on an annual

basis.

As outlined in the Regional Noxious Weed Strategy, when new, small weed infestations are detected, emphasize

eradication of these infestations while providing for the safety of field personnel.

Routinely monitor noxious weed control projects to determine success and to evaluate the need for follow-up

treatments or different control methods. Monitor known weed infestations, as appropriate, to determine changes

in weed population density and rate of spread.

Botanical Resources

Minimize or eliminate direct and indirect impacts on TESP plants unless management activities are designed to

maintain or improve plant populations.

Prohibit or mitigate ground-disturbing activities that negatively affect hydrologic processes that maintain water

flow, water quality, or temperature critical to sustaining fen ecosystems and the plant species dependent on them.

During project analysis, survey, map and protect fens from activities such as trampling by livestock, pack stock,

humans, and wheeled vehicles. Criteria for defining fens include, but are not limited to, presence of sphagnum

moss (Sphagnum spp.), presence of mosses in the genus Meesia, or presence of sundew (Drosera ssp.). Complete

initial inventories of fens within active grazing allotments prior to re-issuing permits.

Conduct field surveys for threatened, endangered, sensitive, and proposed (TESP) plant species early in the

site-specific project planning process so TESP plants and their habitat can be conserved or enhanced. Conduct

surveys according to procedures in the Forest Service Handbook. If additional field surveys are conducted as part

of project implementation, document the survey results in the project file.

Ensure that all projectsinvolving revegetation (planting orseeding) adhere to regional native plant policies(USDA

2008. FSM Chapter 2070).

RANGE

Under season-long grazing: For meadows in early seral status – limit livestock utilization of grass and grass-like

plants to 30 percent (or minimum 6-inch stubble height).

For meadows in late seral status – limit livestock utilization of grass and grass-like plants to a maximum of 40

percent (or minimum 4-inch stubble height).

In meadow areas of great gray owl PACs, maintain herbaceous meadow vegetation at a height commensurate

with site capability and habitat needs of prey species. Follow regional guidance to determine potential prey species

and associated habitat requirements at the project level.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

145

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Grazing utilization in annual grasslands will maintain a minimum of 60 percent cover. Where grasslands are in

satisfactory condition and annual precipitation is greater than 10 inches, manage for 700 pounds residual dry

matter (RDM) per acre. Where grasslands are in satisfactory condition and annual precipitation is less than 10

inches, manage for 400 pounds RDM per acre. Where grasslands are in unsatisfactory condition and annual

precipitation is greater than 10 inches, manage for 1,000 pounds RDM per acre; manage for 700 pounds RDM

per acre where grasslands are in unsatisfactory condition and precipitation is less than 10 inches. Adjust these

standards, as needed, based on grassland condition.

Limit browsing to no more than 20 percent of the annual leader growth of mature riparian shrubs (including

willow and aspen) and no more than 20 percent of individual seedlings. Remove livestock from any area of an

allotment when browsing indicates a change in livestock preference from grazing herbaceous vegetation to

browsing woody riparian vegetation. Herd sheep away from woody riparian vegetation at all times.

To protect hardwood regeneration in grazing allotments, allow livestock browse on no more than 20 percent of

annual growth of hardwood seedlings and advanced regeneration. Alter grazing plans if hardwood regeneration

and recruitment needs are not being met.

Where professional judgment and quantifiable measurements find that current practices are maintaining range in

good to excellent condition, the grazing utilization standards above may be modified to allow for the Forest

Service, in partnership with individual permittees, to rigorously test and evaluate alternative standards.

Evaluate proposals for new concentrated stock areas (for example, livestock handling and management facilities,

pack stations, equestrian stations, and corrals) located within 5 miles of occupied willow flycatcher sites.

Cattle will be distributed in a manner consistent with moderate forage utilization within meadows. Plant

height/weight ratios will be used to monitor the results (BMP 8.3).

Grazing will cease in time to permit re-growth sufficient to store carbohydrates for initial spring growth (as

specified in individual allotment plans).

Meadows will be grazed to allowable use standards as determined by use of any applicable method described in

the most current version of the Region 5 Rangeland Analysis and Planning Guide.

HYDROLOGICAL RESOURCES

Riparian Conservation Areas (RCAs) and Critical Aquatic Refuges (CARs)

Designate riparian conservation area (RCA) widths as described in the 2004 SNFPA ROD, Appendix A, Part B,

page 42:

Perennial Streams: 300 feet on each side of the stream, measured from the bank full edge of the stream.

Seasonally Flowing Streams (includes intermittent and ephemeral streams): 150 feet on each side of the

stream, measured from the bank full edge of the stream.

Streams in Inner Gorge: top of inner gorge.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

146

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Special Aquatic Features(lakes, wet meadows, bogs, fens, wetlands, vernal pools, and springs) or Perennial

Streams with Riparian Coditions extending more than 150 feet from edge of streambank or Seasonally

Flowing streams with riparian conditions extending more than 50 feet from edge of streambank: 300 feet

from edge of feature or riparian vegetation, whichever width is greater.

Other hydrological or topographic depressions without a defined channel: RCA width and protection

measures determined through project level analysis.

RCA widths may be adjusted at the project level if a landscape analysis has been completed and a site-specific

riparian conservation objective (RCO) analysis demonstrates a need for different widths.

Evaluate new proposed management activities within critical aquatic refuges (CARs) and RCAs during

environmental analysis to determine consistency with the riparian conservation objectives at the project level and

the aquatic managementstrategy goalsfor the landscape. Ensure that appropriate mitigation measures are enacted

to (1) minimize the risk of activity-related sediment entering aquatic systems, and (2) minimize impacts to habitat

for aquatic- or riparian-dependent plant and animal species.

Identify existing uses and activitiesin CARs and RCAs during landscape analysis. At the time of permit re-issuance,

evaluate and consider actions needed for consistency with RCOs.

As part of project-level analysis, conduct peer reviews for projects that propose ground-disturbing activities in

more than 25 percent of the RCA or more than 15 percent of a CAR.

Riparian Conservation Objective 1

For waters designated as “water quality limited” (Clean Water Act Section 303(d)), implement appropriate state

mandates for the waterbodies,such as total maximum daily load (TMDL) protocols.

Ensure that management activities do not adversely affect water temperatures necessary for local aquatic- and

riparian-dependent species assemblages.

Maintain temperature at a no more than a daily average of 20oC on streams affected by management activities.

Evaluate stream courses with special circumstances, such as those affected by hot springs or other geologic and

geochemical features, on a site-by-site basis at the project level.

Maintain average stream surface shade at >60 percent on streams affected by management activities. Assess

meadow environments and streams with limited overhead vegetation on a site-by-site basis at the project level.

Ensure that management activities do not adversely affect pH values necessary for local aquatic and

riparian-dependent species as defined by the Central Valley Water Quality Board Basin Plan. Maintain pH values

between 6.5 and 8.5 on streams affected by management activities. Evaluate water bodies that exhibit special

conditions at the project level, including waters affected by hot springs in the presence of CO2springs or other

geologic and geochemical features (such areas would be expected to yield pH values outside the range of state

standards).

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

147

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Ensure that management activities do not adversely affect alkalinity values, which can affect pH values, necessary

for local aquatic- and riparian-dependent species as defined by the Central Valley Water Quality Board Basin

Plan. Maintain alkalinity values of no less than 10 mg/L. Site-specific differences could occur based on local

geology and water chemistry. Evaluate values outside this range at the project level.

Limit pesticide applicationsto cases where project-level analysisindicatesthat pesticide applications are consistent

with RCOs. Use local channel geometry curves to determine the location of flood prone areas. Do not apply

pesticides, including gopher baiting, within the floodprone area of perennial or intermittent stream courses. If a

project's objectives include treatment of riparian areas, evaluate conditions on a site-by-site basis at the project

level.

Within 500 feet of known occupied sites for the California red-legged frog, foothill yellow-legged frog, or

mountain yellow-legged frog, design pesticide applications to avoid adverse effects to individuals and their

habitats.

Prohibit storage of fuels and other toxic materials within RCAs and CARs except at designated administrative

sites and sites covered by a special use authorization. Prohibit refueling within RCAs and CARs unless there is

no other alternative. Ensure that spill plans are reviewed and up-to-date.

Riparian Conservation Objective 2

Maintain and restore the hydrologic connectivity ofstreams, meadows, wetlands, and otherspecial aquatic features

by identifying roads and trails that intercept, divert, or disrupt natural surface and subsurface water flow paths.

Implement corrective actions, where necessary, to restore connectivity.

Maintain and restore the hydrologic connectivity of meadows by identifying those at risk. Implement corrective

actions, where necessary, to restore connectivity of meadows to their floodplain.

A stream condition inventory (SCI) may be used instead of proper functioning condition (PFC) to validate an

existing PFC determination or existing meadow condition.

Perform a full hydrologic survey prior to restoration. Include a longitudinal profile and adequate cross-section

surveys to determine design parameters. At a minimum, determine meadow pattern, profile, and dimensions for

the impaired site and the design.

Design projects by a qualified specialist prior to implementation. A qualified specialist is one that has received

training in river restoration and natural channel design. Have the design reviewed by a forest hydrologist prior

to implementation.

Make sure all restoration issustainable. Designsthat require continued maintenance are not considered sustainable.

Ensure that culverts or other stream crossings do not create barriers to upstream or downstream passage for

aquatic-dependent species. Locate water drafting sites to avoid adverse effects on stream flows and depletion of

pool habitat. Where possible, maintain and restore the timing, variability, and duration of floodplain inundation

and water table elevation in meadows, wetlands, and other special aquatic features.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

148

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Prior to activities that could adversely affect streams, determine if relevant stream characteristics are within the

range of natural variability. If characteristics are outside the range of natural variability, implement mitigation

measures and short-term restoration actions needed to prevent further declines or cause an upward trend in

conditions. Evaluate required long-term restoration actions and implement them according to their status among

other restoration needs.

Maintain width to depth ratios for A and E channels of values less than 14 on streams affected by management

activities. Maintain width to depth ratios for B, C, and F channels of values greater than 10 on stream channels

affected by management activities. Encourage G and F channels to trend towards width to depth ratios greater

than 12.

Evaluate streams affected by management activities to detect shifts in mean particle size toward fine material in

stable channel types (A, B, C, or E) to the extent that a change in channel type occurs. Mean particle size would

be expected to change in impaired systems or following restoration activities. Evaluate stream courses with special

circumstances on a site-by-site basis at the project level.

Manage for specific components of the Pfankuch channel and stream stability indices that might be affected by

management activities. Evaluate special conditions at the project level:

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

149

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

For stable streams (A, B, C, or E), maintain or improve the channel, as necessary, based on the Pfankuch channel

and stream stability indices. Take action to maintain or improve stream sites based on successional stage shifts

away from stable conditions. For impaired stream reaches (G, F, or D), successional stage shifts from the impaired

stream reach would show a trend toward an unimpaired condition.

Prevent disturbance to streambanks and natural lake and pond shorelines caused by management activities and

resource use (such as livestock and dispersed recreation) from exceeding 20 percent of a stream reach or 20

percent of natural lake and pond shorelines. Disturbance includes bank sloughing, chiseling, trampling, and other

means of exposing bare soil or cutting plant roots. This standard does not apply to developed recreation sites,

sites authorized under special use permits, or roads.

In stream reaches occupied by, or identified as “essential habitat” in the conservation assessment for, the Lahonton

and Paiute cutthroat trout and the Little Kern golden trout, limit streambank disturbance from livestock to 10

percent of the occupied or “essential habitat” stream reach (conservation assessments are described in the 2004

SNFPA ROD, page 10;see http://www.tucalifornia.org/cgtic/GTCAssessmnt&Strategy9-04.pdf). Cooperate with

state and federal agencies to develop streambank disturbance standards for threatened, endangered, and sensitive

species. Use the regional streambank assessment protocol. Implement corrective action where disturbance limits

have been exceeded.

Maintain width to depth ratios for A and E channels of values less than 14 on streams affected by management

activities. Maintain width to depth ratios for B, C, and F channels of values greater than 10 on streams affected

by management activities. Encourage G channels to trend towards width to depth ratios greater than 12.

At either the landscape or project level, determine if the age class, structural diversity, composition, and cover

of riparian vegetation are within the range of natural variability for the vegetative community. If conditions are

outside the range of natural variability, consider implementing mitigation and/or restoration actions that will

result in an upward trend. Actions could include restoration of aspen or other riparian vegetation where conifer

encroachment is identified as a problem.

Cooperate with federal, tribal,state, and local governmentsto secure in-stream flows needed to maintain, recover,

and restore riparian resources, channel conditions, and aquatic habitat. Maintain in-stream flowsto protect aquatic

systems to which species are uniquely adapted. Minimize the effects of stream diversions or other flow

modifications from hydroelectric projects on threatened, endangered, and sensitive species.

For exempt hydroelectric facilities on national forest lands, ensure that special use permit language provides

adequate in-stream flow requirements to maintain, restore, or recover favorable ecological conditions for local

riparian- and aquatic-dependent species.

Riparian Conservation Objective 3

Determine if the level of coarse large woody debris is within the range of natural variability in terms of frequency

and distribution and is sufficient to sustain stream channel physical complexity and stability. Ensure that proposed

management activities move conditions toward the range of natural variability for coarse large woody debris.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

150

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Maintain woody material in and adjacent to stream courses. Where fire is responsible for removal of woody

material, replace at levels associated with pre-fire conditions, if possible. Evaluate the amount of wood necessary

for maintenance of stream stability, sediment reduction, and aquatic species habitat.

Riparian Conservation Objective 4

Within CARs, in occupied habitat or “essential habitat” as identified in conservation assessments for threatened,

endangered, or sensitive species, evaluate the appropriate role, timing, and extent of prescribed fire. Avoid direct

lighting within riparian vegetation; prescribed fires may back into riparian vegetation areas. Develop mitigation

measures to avoid impacts to these species whenever ground-disturbing equipment is used.

Use screening devices for water drafting pumps (fire suppression activities are exempt during initial attack). Use

pumps with low entry velocity to minimize removal of aquatic species, including juvenile fish, amphibian egg

masses, and tadpoles.

Design prescribed fire treatments to minimize disturbance of ground cover and riparian vegetation in RCAs. In

burn plans for project areas that include or are adjacent to RCAs, identify mitigation measures to minimize the

spread of fire into riparian vegetation. In determining mitigation measures, weigh the potential harm of mitigation

measures (e.g.,firelines) against the risks and benefits of prescribed fire entering riparian vegetation. Strategies

should recognize the role of fire in ecosystem function and identify those instances when fire suppression or fuel

management actions could be damaging to habitat or the long-term function of a riparian community.

Post-wildfire management activities in RCAs and CARs should emphasize enhancing native vegetation cover,

stabilizing channels by non-structural means, minimizing adverse effects from the existing road network, and

carrying out activities identified in landscape analyses. Post-wildfire operations shall minimize the exposure of

bare soil.

Allow hazard tree removal within RCAs or CARsif it is clearly needed for ecological restoration and maintenance

or public safety. Allow mechanical ground-disturbing fuels treatments, salvage harvest, or commercial fuelwood

cutting within RCAs or CARs when the activity is consistent with RCOs and it is clearly needed for ecological

restoration and maintenance or public safety. Utilize low-ground-pressure equipment, helicopters, over-the-snow

logging, or other non-ground-disturbing actions off of existing roads when needed to achieve RCOs. Ensure that

existing roads, landings, and skid trails meet best management practices (BMPs). Minimize the construction of

new skid trails or roads into RCAs for access for fuel treatments, salvage harvest, commercial fuelwood cutting,

or hazard tree removal.

As appropriate, assess and document aquatic conditionsfollowing the regionalstream condition inventory protocol

prior to implementing ground-disturbing activities within suitable habitat for California red-legged frogs, foothill

yellow-legged frogs, and mountain yellow-legged frogs.

Maintain average stream surface shade at or above 60 percent on streams affected by management activities.

Assess meadow environments and other streams with limited overhead vegetation for site-specific projects.

Maintain width to depth ratios for A and E channels of values less than 14 on streams affected by management

activities. Maintain width to depth ratios for B, C, and F channels of values greater than 10 on streams affected

by management activities. Encourage G channels to trend towards width to depth ratios greater than 12.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

151

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Evaluate streams affected by management activities to detect shifts in mean particle size toward fine material in

stable channel types (A, B, C, or E) to the extent that a change in channel type occurs. Mean particle size would

be expected to change in impaired systems or following restoration activities. Evaluate stream courses with special

circumstances on a site-by-site basis at the project level.

Maintain 85 percent of any waterbodies affected by management activities at no less than very good water quality

based on the Hilsenhoff biotic index or similar indices. Evaluate waterbodies outside of this range for site-specific

impacts. Indices would be less than <4.50 on Hilsenhoff biotic index or indicate very good water quality with

similar indices. A biotic index or other index of this value should indicate no apparent to possible slight organic

pollution. Evaluate waterbodies outside of this range for site-specific projects.

Manage for specific components of the Pfankuch channel and stream stability indices that might be affected by

management activities. Evaluate special conditions at the project level (see table above).

During fire suppression activities, consider impacts to aquatic- and riparian-dependent resources. Where possible,

locate incident bases, camps, helibases, staging areas, helispots, and other centers for incident activities outside

of RCAs or CARs. During pre-suppression planning, include guidelines for suppression activities that avoid

potential adverse effects to aquatic- and riparian-dependent species.

Identify roads, trails, staging areas, developed recreation sites, dispersed campgrounds, areas under special use

permits or grazing permits, and day use sites during landscape analysis. Identify conditions that degrade water

quality or habitat for aquatic- and riparian-dependent species. At the project level, evaluate and consider actions

to ensure consistency with standards and guidelines.

Riparian Conservation Objective 5

Assess the hydrologic function of meadow habitats and other special aquatic features during site-specific range

management analysis. Ensure that characteristics of special features are, at a minimum, at proper functioning

condition (PFC), as defined in the following technical reports (or their successor publications): (1) Process for

Assessing PFC, TR 1737-9 (1993); (2) PFC for Lotic Areas, USDI TR 1737-15 (1998); (3) PFC for Lentic

Riparian-Wetland Areas, USDI TR 1737-11 (1994); and (4) Assessing Proper Functioning Condition for Fen

Areas in the Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascade Ranges in California: A User Guide, USDA Forest Service,

R5-TP-028 (April 2009).

Assess the hydrologic function of at-risk meadow habitats. Ensure that characteristics are, at a minimum, at PFC

as defined in the Process for Assessing PFC, TR 1737-9 (1993); PFC for Lotic Areas, USDI TR 1737-15 (1998);

or PFC for Lentic Riparian-Wetland Areas, USDI TR 1737-16 (Rev. 2003).

Prohibit or mitigate ground-disturbing activities that adversely affect hydrologic processes that maintain water

flow, water quality, or water temperature critical to sustaining bog and fen ecosystems and plant species that

depend on these ecosystems. During project analysis, survey, map, and develop measures to protect bogs and

fensfrom such activities astrampling by livestock, pack stock, humans, and wheeled vehicles. Criteria for defining

bogs and fens include, but are not limited to, the presence of sphagnum moss (Sphagnum spp.), mosses belonging

to the genus Meessia, or sundew (Drosera spp.). Complete initial plant inventories of bogs and fens within active

grazing allotments prior to re-issuing permits.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

152

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Maintain temperature at a daily average of no more than 20oC on streams affected by management activities.

Evaluate stream courses with special circumstances or conditions, such as those affected by hot springs, for

site-specific projects.

Locate new facilities for gathering livestock and pack stock outside of meadows and RCAs. During project-level

planning, evaluate and consider relocating existing livestock facilities outside of meadows and riparian areas.

Prior to re-issuing grazing permits, assess the compatibility of livestock management facilities located in RCAs

with RCOs.

Determine ecological status on all key areas monitored for grazing utilization prior to establishing utilization

levels. Use regional ecologicalscore cards and range plant list in regional range handbooksto determine ecological

status. Analyze meadow ecological status every 3 to 5 years. If meadow ecological status is determined to be

moving in a downward trend, modify or suspend grazing. Include ecological status data in a spatially explicit

geographic information system (GIS) database.

Under intensive grazing systems (such as rest-rotation and deferred rotation) where meadows are receiving a

period of rest, utilization levels can be higher than the levels described above if the meadow is maintained in late

seral status and meadow-associated species are not being impacted. Degraded meadows (such as those in early

seral status with greater than 10 percent of the meadow area in bare soil and active erosion) require total rest from

grazing until they have recovered and have moved to mid- or late seral status.

Limit browsing to no more than 20 percent of the annual leader growth of mature riparian shrubs and no more

than 20 percent of individualseedlings. Remove livestock from any area of an allotment when browsing indicates

a change in livestock preference from herbaceous vegetation to woody riparian vegetation.

Riparian Conservation Objective 6

Recommend restoration practices in: (1) areas with compaction higher than that allowed in soil quality standards,

(2) areas with lowered water tables, or (3) areas with either active downcutting or historic gullies. Identify other

management activities (e.g., road building, recreational use, grazing, and fuels reduction) that may be contributing

to the observed degradation.

Maintain width to depth ratios for A and E channels of values less than 14 on streams affected by management

activities. Maintain width to depth ratios for B, C, and F channels of values greater than 10 on streams affected

by management activities. Encourage G channels to trend towards width to depths greater than 12.

For stable streams (A, B, C, or E), maintain or improve the channel as necessary based on stability indices. Take

action to maintain or improve stream sites based on successional stage shifts away from stable conditions. For

impaired stream reaches (G, F, or D), successional stage shifts from the impaired stream reach would show a

trend toward an unimpaired condition.

Streamside Management Zones

Determine streamside management zone (SMZ) widths. Field conditions, including stream type and project

objectives, should dictate the streamside management zone width at the project level.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

153

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

GROUNDWATER

Establish a minimum distance from a connected river,stream, wetland, or other groundwater-dependent ecosystem

from which a well may be sited.

Establish minimum limits to which water levels can be drawn down at a specified distance from a

groundwater-dependent ecosystem.

Conduct appropriate analyses when evaluating proposals and applications for water wells or other activities that

propose to test, study, monitor, modify, remediate, withdraw, or inject ground water on NFS lands (see Technical

Guide to Managing Ground Water Resources, FS-881, May 2007).

GEOLOGICAL RESOURCES

Protect cave entrances from all activities, including prescribed fire, mechanical treatments, and recreation.

Evaluate proposed septic systems to determine their potential to contaminate groundwater that moves through

cave systems.

HUMAN USES(1)

Cross-country travel may be restricted to prevent resource damage.

Manage dispersed recreation activities by location and period of use based on wildlife needs (e.g., excluding

incompatible use from key areas during fawning and nesting).

Encourage energy development, when sources are available, as long as the development is consistent with other

standards and guidelines.

Energy

Encourage energy development, when sources are available, as long as the development is consistent with other

standards and guidelines.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

154

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Scenery

Design management activities to meet and exceed when practical the specified Scenic Integrity Objective (SIO).

Meet scenic integrity objectives with the following exceptions: (1) accept occasional short-term departure from

adopted minimum scenic integrity that will lead to long-term desired scenic character if disclosed in a site-specific

NEPA decision, and (2) temporary drops of one minimum scenic integrity level may be made during and

immediately following project implementation providing they do not exceed 3 years in duration.

Include mitigation measures for activities that alter the landscape beyond the adopted minimum scenic stability.

CULTURAL RESOURCES

Protect cultural resourcesfrom the effects of Forest Service or Forest Service-authorized undertakings, unauthorized

use, and environmental damage by complying with the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and its

implementing regulations in 36 CFR 800. This includes completing cultural resource inventories prior to any

action that may effect cultural resources. Develop follow-up actionsfor evaluation ofsitesfor the National Register

of Historic Places (NRHP), protection, and/or interpretation as result of inventory findings.

Comply with Section 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) for non-project inventory, including:

1. Conduct inventories as necessary, occasionally doing non-project-specific surveys.

2. Complete archaeological reconnaissance reports and site records to allow evaluation of site significance.

3. Release those site locations declared not significant for other management activities.

4. Approach systematically the reduction of the existing forest backlog of sites to be evaluated. Those types

of sites deemed more potentially critical in the forest overview will receive priority.

Fully integrate opportunitiesfor preservation, protection, and utilization of cultural resourcesinto land use planning

and decisions through:

1. Assessing potential effects on heritage resources on a project-specific basis.

2. Avoiding or mitigating effects on sites eligible for the National Register or other significant sites.

3. Follow-up monitoring to assess the effectiveness of management procedures.

4. Post and sign (e.g., tractors prohibited, Antiquities Act) selected cultural resource sites where such signing

will not endanger the sites.

5. Monitor number of sites for protection visits on revolving basis, and prioritize according to resource

significance and vulnerability as developed in the forest overview.

6. Develop and provide interpretive brochures for selected sites.

Conduct on-the-ground interpretation at a number of sites that exist at or near developed sites, where high level

of use or exposure is possible (i.e., properties adjacent to campgrounds, historic logging activities in the vicinity

of campgrounds).

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

155

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Regularly consult with Native Americans as interested parties on proposed undertakings.

Establish and maintain effective relationships with federal, state, tribal, and local governments and historic

preservation organizations at all levels of the agency to ensure protection of cultural resources and to promote

heritage program efficiencies (FSM 2300 Chapter 2360.3).

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

To protect watershed resources, meet the following standards for road construction, road reconstruction, and road

relocation: (1) design new stream crossings and replacement stream crossings for at least the 100-year flood,

including bedload and debris; (2) design stream crossings to minimize the diversion of streamflow out of the

channel and down the road in the event of a crossing failure; (3) design stream crossings to minimize disruption

of natural hydrologic flow paths, including minimizing diversion of streamflow and interception of surface and

subsurface water; (4) avoid wetlands or minimize effects to natural flow patterns in wetlands; and (5) avoid road

construction in meadows.

Maintain developed trailhead access roads and primary access routes to developed facilities at a minimum of

Maintenance Level 3.

Construct and maintain trail bridges consistent with wilderness uses.

Use seasonal closure as a tool to protect key wildlife values, environmental resources, and road investment.

Limit motorized vehicles to designated roads.

Limit non-motorized mechanized vehicles (such as bicycles) to designated roads and trails.

Limit over-snow vehicles to designated roads.

SPECIAL AREAS

Kings River Special Management Area (KRSMA)

Arch sites: Sites are maintained in a condition that will permit an evaluation of significance and, if appropriate,

listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Significant sites are protected to permit future data recovery

(KRSMA MP p. 53).

Suitable fish habitat: R-5 minimum management requirements, FLMP guidelines, riparian standards and guidelines,

and best management practices are being applied in a way that supports the objectives established in the SMA

and WSR EIS and Plan; and project-specific NEPA documents (KRSMA MP p. 53).

Management of SMA and WSR: Periodic reviews to evaluate the effectiveness of management directions and

monitoring plan indicate that the documents reflect the current environmental social and administrative needs in

the area (KRSMA MP p. 53).

Transportation system: The transportation system’s effectiveness meets the opportunity class and zone objectives.

Project-specific NEPA documents and the forest trails plan reflect the objective in the SMA and WSR EIS and

Plan (KRSMA MP p. 54).

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

156

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Water quality: Implementation of BMPs and project design do not permit a decrease in water quality (KRSMA

MP p. 54)

TES species: Project plans and prescriptions are implemented as designed, consistent with the biological evaluations

(KRSMA MP p. 54).

Standards for South Fork Zone:

Public use areas consistency with opportunity class III: Dispersed recreation impacts are temporary, and are

commonly only fire rings in the turnouts along Highway 180. Impacts from recreational activities may be evident

to the visitor. Use areas are generally >50 feet apart and are fewer than two per 320 acres (KRSMA MP p. 57).

Management of Highway 180, Boyden Cavern, and Grizzly Falls: Adequate parking is provided, sanitation

facilities meet current needs, and all facilities complement the area’s natural scenic resources (KRSMA MP p.

57).

Zone aside from Highway 180, Boyden Cavern, and Grizzly Falls: A low probability of meeting other parties or

forest users during low-use periods (<50 percent chance), a possible encounter with other recreationists during

the spring (25 to 50 percent chance) (KRSMA MP p. 57).

Management focus on river-based and unique opportunities: all resource conditions, social conditions, and

management activities reflect the characteristics described for opportunity class II and the objectives for this zone

(KRSMA MP p. 57).

Standards for Verplank Zone:

Campsite consistency with opportunity class II: Campsites are small and temporary. Some facilities are provided.

Impacts from recreational activities may be evident to the visitor. Campsites are >50 feet apart and are fewer than

five per 320 acres (KRSMA MP p. 58).

Few encounters between travelers: A low probability of meeting other parties or forest users during low-use

periods (<50 percent chance), a possible encounter with other recreationists during the spring (25 to 50 percent

chance) (KRSMA MP p. 58).

Scope of OHV, grazing, and vegetation management: Use of forest resources and OHV use of designated routes

is consistent with the long-term protection of the area’s natural, archaeological, and scenic resources (KRSMA

MP p. 58).

Management focus to balance recreation with maintaining natural environment: All resource conditions, social

conditions, and management activitiesreflect the characteristics described for opportunity classII and the objectives

for this zone (KRSMA MP p. 58).

Standards for Converse Zone:

Campsite consistency with opportunity class I: Campsites are small and temporary. No facilities are provided.

Impacts are not evident to the visitor. Campsites are >100 feet apart and are fewer than two per 320 acres(KRSMA

MP p. 59).

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

157

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Human developments: No large developments are permitted, and small developments are temporary orsubordinate

to the environmental setting (KRSMA MP p. 59).

Few encounters between travelers: Extremely low probability of meeting other parties or forest users during

low-use periods (<25 percent chance), a possible encounter with other recreationists on the National Recreation

Trail and the Yucca Point Trail (25 to 50 percent chance) (KRSMA MP p. 59).

Management emphasizes maintaining natural environment: All resource conditions, social conditions and

management activities reflect the characteristics described for opportunity class I and the objectives for this zone

(KRSMA MP p. 59).

Standards for Boole Zone:

Campsite consistency with opportunity class II: Campsites are small and temporary. Some facilities may be

provided. Impacts from recreational activities may be evident to the visitor. Campsites are >50 feet apart and are

fewer than five per 320 acres (KRSMA MP p. 60).

Few encounters between travelers: A low probability of meeting other parties or forest users during low-use

periods (<50 percent chance), a possible encounter with other recreationists along the Boole Tree Trail (25 to 50

percent chance) (KRSMA MP p. 60).

Scope of OHV, grazing, and vegetation management: Use of forest resources and OHV use of designated routes

is consistent with the long-term protection of the area’s natural, archaeological, and scenic resources (KRSMA

MP p. 60).

Standards for Kings River Corridor Zone (Portion Within the Monument):

Dead and down material: Ten tons per acre of dead and down material should be available for wildlife and

recreational campfire building (KRSMA MP p. 61).

Human developments: Not more than five developments per a 320-acre area. Developments include structures

and facilities for recreation and non-recreation activities (KRSMA MP p. 61).

Vandalism impacts to visuals: No more than three new occurrences of graffiti vandalism or defacing of natural

features located anywhere within the zone per year (KRSMA MP p. 61).

Dispersed campsites: No more than five sites within a quarter-mile length of the river corridor. Dispersed site

locations should not impact the experience of other campers (KRSMA MP p. 61).

Group camping (encourage use outside SMA/WSR corridor): No more than five declined requests for group

camping. The existing accommodations for group camping should meet user needs (KRSMA MP p. 62).

Few encounters between travelers: Fifty percent probability of no more than five encounters with other parties

(KRSMA MP p. 62).

Conflicts between users: No more than five reported or otherwise documented conflicts between different types

of users (e.g. anglers and rafters) (KRSMA MP p. 62).

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

158

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Standard/Guideline

Public safety: No more than four accidents per year within the zone, with attention to rafting incidents. Accidents

are incidents where there is either an incident report filed by a forest officer or a forest visitor requires medical

attention (KRSMA MP p. 62).

Public parking that protects resource and provides public safety: Public parking space should be provided at a

level that protects the resource and provides for public safety and comfort. Visitors should find adequate parking

at trailheads, raft put-ins, and raft take-outs.

Congestion at launch site: Rafting groups do not wait longer than 60 minutes to launch (KRSMA MP p. 63).

Groups encountered on river per day: Maximum of 17 parties per day (KRSMA MP p. 63).

Research Natural Areas

Protect and manage South Mountaineer Creek, a potential research natural area, as if it was already established,

pending its final establishment or release by the Chief of the Forest Service.

Botanical Areas

The Sequoia National Forest shall manage this area [Freeman Creek Grove] as a botanical area.

There shall be no logging and no motorized vehicle use by the public anywhere in the Freeman Creek grove

management area as shown on the map Exhibit E.

1. Including Recreation, Scenery, and Socioeconomics.

Comments: 74

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

159

Appendix F-Standards and Guidelines
Desired Conditions

Safe and fully maintained roads and trails that minimize adverse resource impacts provide public and administrative

access to National Forest System lands and facilities within the Monument. Appropriate access is provided to the

objects of interest for their proper care, protection, and management.

The Proclamation states:

The management plan shall contain a transportation plan for the monument that providesfor visitor enjoyment

and understanding about the scientific and historic objects in the monument, consistent with their protection.

For the purposes of protecting the objects included in the monument, motorized vehicle use will be permitted

only on designated roads, and non-motorized mechanized vehicle use will be permitted only on designated

roads and trails, except for emergency or authorized administrative purposes or to provide access for persons

with disabilities. No new roads or trails will be authorized within the monument except to further the purposes

of the monument. Prior to the issuance of the management plan, existing roads and trails may be closed or

altered to protect the objects of interest in the monument, and motorized vehicle use will be permitted on

trails until but not after December 31, 2000 (Clinton 2000, p. 24098).

Current management of the Monument complies with the proclamation direction to limit motorized vehicles to

designated roads, with the exception of Trails 27E04 and 27E05 in the Kings River Special Management Area

KRSMA. Designated road maps were published in 2001 and with the 2003 Monument Plan Final EIS, and motor

vehicle use maps (MVUMs) were published in 2008 to reflect this management of the transportation system in the

Monument (the two MVUMs covering the Monument are included in the Map Packet for this draft Monument

Plan).

Strategies and Objectives for the Transportation System

The transportation system will provide high levels of access for public and management use, consistent with

protection and restoration of the Monument. New roads will be constructed to meet management goals such as to

provide access to new recreation facilities, to provide access to the objects of interest, to provide access to new

administrative sites, to replace roads that have unacceptable resource impacts, or to provide access for scientific

research.

Strategies

1. Size and maintain the road and trail system to limit impacts on resources and promote aquatic organism

passage where needed.

2. Convert to trails or decommission roads not needed to meet management objectives so that natural drainage

patterns are restored and natural vegetation will grow back over time.

3. Maintain roads with effective road drainage and erosion controls to conserve existing soil and reduce effects

to adjacent riparian and aquatic systems.

4. Complete 6th-field watershed analyses and review the transportation system in the Monument to determine

the future status of roads, including changes in status, decommissioning, or convertion to trails.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

160

Appendix G-Transportation Plan
5. Consult with local tribal governments and Native Americans to provide transportation and access needs,

including culturally important sites and resources for use by Native Americans.

6. Coordinate transportation planning, management, and road decommissioning with Sequoia and Kings Canyon

National Parks; other federal, state, and county agencies; and the Tule River Indian Tribe, to reduce traffic

congestion and safety hazards, especially along major travelways.

7. Partner with state and local agencies to maintain roads for four-season use where appropriate.

8. Provide appropriate parking facilities.

9. Base proposals for new roads on the need to provide access to recreation opportunities, other public use, or

management activities, as appropriate.

Objectives

1. Within 2 years, complete Subpart A of Travel Management for the Monument.

2. Within 2 years, complete a Monument-wide watershed improvement needs inventory (WINI) to identify

adverse impacts on watersheds from roads and trails.

3. Within 5 years, publish an updated motor vehicle use maps (MVUM) for the Monument ranger districts.

4. Within 10 years, establish a sustainable and desirable off-highway vehicle (OHV) route system (on the existing

road system) that reflects the updated MVUM, including loop opportunities where feasible and appropriate.

Current Transportation System

Road System

The road system in the Monument consists of approximately 822 miles of classified roads, ranging from single-lane

dirt roads to paved-double lane roads. The miles of road by their assigned maintenance level (ML) is shown in the

following table. These data are derived from the forest corporate tabular database for infrastructure (INFRA). The

objective ML is the desired future condition of the road based on potential future access needs and maintenance

capabilities. The operational ML is the current maintenance level assigned to a road based on access needs and

maintenance capabilities. Both maintenance levels may change in the future.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

161

Appendix G-Transportation Plan
Table 33 Miles of Roads in the Monument by Maintenance Level

Maintenance Levels (ML) Objective ML Operational ML

1 (closed to motorized traffic) 313 71

2 (managed for high-clearance vehicles) 255 515

3 (low standard, passenger vehicle traffic) 134 127

4 (moderate standard, passenger vehicle traffic) 69 72

5 (two-lane paved, passenger vehicle traffic) 51 37

Total Miles 822 822

Each road has a functional designation as an arterial, collector, or local road, as shown in the following table (data

from the INFRA database). Arterial roads are the main roads that traverse the forest and connect to major state

highways or county roads. They are paved and designed for higher-speed travel. Collector roads connect the arterial

roads to local roads and balance access needs with construction and maintenance costs. Local roads at the ends of

collector roadsserve a small land area and tend to be maintained at a low standard. The difference between objective

and operational functional classes is similar to the operational and objective maintenance levels discussed above.

Table 34 Miles of Road by Functional Class

Functional Class Objective Class Operational Class

Arterial 120 109

Collector 134 127

Local 568 586

Total miles 822 822

Approximately 150 miles of road are designated for OHV use in the northern portion of the Monument. The southern

portion has OHV recreation opportunities on approximately 300 miles of unpaved, designated roads.

The road system in the Monument that is currently designated for motorized use is shown on the MVUMs for the

Hume Lake and Western Divide Ranger Districts (see the map packet). These maps are published as required by

the Travel Management Rule; they display the entire districts, including land outside the Monument, because they

cannot be published for areas smaller than an administrative unit.

Trail System

The trail system within the Monument currently consists of approximately 196 miles of system trails, including

about 12 miles of the Summit National Recreation Trail. Twelve developed trailheads offer parking, information,

and restrooms; and 10 other trailheads provide only parking for trail users.

Some trail facilities are located within the current administrative boundaries of giantsequoia groves. Two interpretive

trails, the Indian Basin Trail and the Trail of 100 Giants (about 23 miles combined) and seven trailheads (Chicago

Stump, Boole Tree, Cherry Gap, Evans, Little Boulder, Freeman Creek, and Needles) are located in groves. OHV

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

162

Appendix G-Transportation Plan
use is still allowed on about 3.8 miles of trail in the Kings River Special Management Area, which was designated

under Public Law 100-150. This public law takes precedence over the proclamation (Clinton 2000). This motorized

use is shown on the MVUM for the Hume Lake Ranger District (see the map packet).

Snowmobile Use

In the northern portion of the Monument, 39 miles of marked routes are available for over-snow vehicles, 21 of

which are groomed; an additional 50 miles of unmarked roadbeds are open to snowmobiles. These routes offer

opportunities for all levels of riding experience, from easy, groomed routes to very difficult, deep-powder routes.

Facilities include four winter trailheads with parking, two of which have restrooms. Montecito Lake Resort,

authorized under special use permit, offers 31 miles of groomed trails used exclusively by cross-country skiers.

The southern portion of the Monument features approximately 114 miles of primary groomed and marked roads,

68 miles of secondary groomed and marked roads, a warming hut located north of the junction of State Highway

190 and the Western Divide Highway, and three trailheads. Cross-country skiing commonly occurs along the

groomed snowmobile routes with some adventure trail-breaking occurring off-road. Volunteers commonly mark

approximately four miles of ungroomed ski trails in the Quaking Aspen/Ponderosa and Parker Pass areas.

Transportation System Management

Maintenance Strategy

Currently available funding is insufficient to fully maintain the existing road system. The following strategies will

be used to prioritize needed maintenance and to improve the ability to complete all needed maintenance:

1. Public safety and natural resource protection would be the highest priorities for maintenance.

2. Maintenance Levels 3 through 5 roads would be higher priority for maintenance than Maintenance Levels 1

and 2 roads due to the higher potential loss of investment, generally higher traffic volumes and speeds, and

resulting safety risks and liabilities.

3. Submit appropriate projects for maintenance, reconstruction, or rehabilitation funding when opportunities are

available (agency funding, state grants, partnerships, and other sources).

4. Seek additional sources of funding to reduce the maintenance backlog and keep the road system in acceptable

condition. Potential sources include Federal Highway Trust Fund funding through the national transportation

bill and appropriated funding specifically for specially designated areas such as monuments.

5. Partner with user groups, permitees, and other entities to accomplish needed road maintenance.

6. Consider reducing the assigned maintenance level of individual roads based on access needs, resource risks,

and costs to improve the ability to maintain the entire road system.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

163

Appendix G-Transportation Plan
7. Consider closing roads not currently needed for resource management activities or significant recreation

access, to reduce maintenance costs while retaining the road prism for expected future access needs.

8. Consider opportunitiesto reduce the size of the road system by decommissioning individual roads or converting

them to non-motorized trails.

Road System Changes

Changes to the road system may include construction of new roads, removal of roads from the system through

decommissioning, and conversion of roads to trails. New roads could be constructed to meet management goals to

provide access to new recreation facilities or opportunities; to provide access to the objects of interest; to provide

access to administrative sites (ranger stations, work centers, etc.); to replace roads producing unacceptable resource

impacts; or to provide access for scientific research.

The priority for road retention emphasizesretaining road accessfor public use and for management activitiessimilar

to current accesslevels. For public access, emphasisshould be on maintaining roadsto recreation sites, concentrated

use areas used for dispersed recreation, sites authorized by special use permits, and private land. A road system

should be available for recreation driving and off-highway vehicle use. For management access, emphasis should

be on ecosystem restoration and fire protection.

Roads with high risks for causing unacceptable impacts to natural resources should be repaired, relocated, closed,

or decommissioned to reduce impacts. Road decommissioning should focus on roads producing unacceptable

impacts where repair or relocation are unreasonable, roads where the potential for resource impacts and high

maintenance costs outweigh the need for access for resource management or recreation, and any unauthorized

motorized routes remaining after the road system was designated in 2000, as required by the proclamation.

Changes to the road system will be made through the travel analysis process and site-specific NEPA analysis. The

objective of travel analysis is to provide decisionmakers with critical information to develop road systems that are

safe and responsive to public needs and desires, are affordable and efficiently managed, have minimal negative

ecological effects on the land, and are in balance with available funding for needed management actions. Travel

analysis is required to inform decisions related to identification of the minimum road system needed for safe and

efficient travel and for administration, utilization, and protection of National Forest System lands; and to inform

decisions related to the designation of roads for motor vehicle use.

An analysis of the entire designated road system in the Monument was completed in 2003 following the roads

analysis process (RAP), which was agency direction at the time. The process was very similar to the current

transportation analysis direction, except that it was expanded to include motorized trails and areas. Since motorized

travel is limited to designated roads in the Monument, the RAP completed in 2003 is still a valid tool to help inform

decisions about the road system.

In the completed RAP, evaluation criteria were created based on specific topic areas described in the FS-643

miscellaneous report (agency direction at the time). These topics included ecosystem functions and processes;

aquatic, riparian zones, and water quality; terrestrial wildlife; economics; minerals and range management, water

production, and special forest products; special use permits; general public transportation; administrative uses;

protection; road-related and unroaded recreation; passive use values;social issues; and civil rights and environmental

justice. The same criteria would be appropriate to evaluate the need for future changes in the trail system.

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

164

Appendix G-Transportation Plan
The evaluation criteria developed for the Monument RAP were:

Aquatic risk factors

1. Geologic hazard

2. Stream crossing density

3. Riparian zone – stream proximity

Terrestrial risk factors

1. Heritage resources

2. Road density effects on wildlife habitat

3. Scenic resources

Access factors

1. Private/non-recreation public access

2. Public access (recreation)

3. Administrative site access

4. Vegetation management

5. Fire protection

Social factors

1. Lifestyle, attitudes, beliefs and values

2. Economics

The aquatic and terrestrial risk factors were combined into a consolidated “risk equivalent” with a rating of low,

medium, or high. The access and social factors were also combined into a consolidated “need equivalent” with a

rating of low, medium, or high. This resulted in a combined potential risk versus need equivalent rating for each

road in the system. The nine potential combined ratings are displayed in the following table.

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

165

Appendix G-Transportation Plan
Table 35 Table Potential Risk and Need Equivalent Combination Ratings

Risk Equivalent Need Equivalent

Low/low Low/moderate Low/high

Moderate/low Moderate/moderate Moderate/high

High/low High/moderate High/high

Based on the combined rating, roads could be considered for the following changes:

1. Roads rarely used by the public or Forest Service (i.e., low need equivalent) and with high risk equivalent

could be considered for decommissioning.

2. Roads rarely used by the public or Forest Service (i.e., low need equivalent) and with low resource risk

equivalent could be considered for decommissioning or storm-proofing.

3. Roads accessing vegetation that has reached desired condition may be evaluated for decommissioning or

storm-proofing.

4. Roads frequently used by the public or Forest Service (i.e., moderate to high need equivalent) with moderate

to high resource risk equivalent could be evaluated to relocate portions of the roads away from resource risks

or create alternate access routes with fewer resource risks.

5. Where two or more roads access the same area, traffic could be directed onto the more stable road and the

less stable road(s) could be decommissioned.

The complete RAP can be found in Appendix A of the Transportation Report and listing of roads is in Appendix

B of the Transportation Report, which is available in the project file at the Supervisor's Office of the Sequoia

National Forest.

Some topic areas are best evaluated at the more site-specific scale than at the forest or monument-wide scale. Some

data can become diluted at the broad scale so that areas appear to have low impacts, whereas negative impacts can

be seen and evaluated more readily at the more site-specific scale. The Monument RAP was conducted at a broad,

forest scale to identify overall trends. Travel analysis can be conducted at multiple scales as required to adequately

inform proposed actions.

When changes are proposed to the road system to further the purposes of the Monument, the decisions made will

be informed by travel analysis and site-specific project analysis. Evaluation criteria for the travel analysis will

include criteria similar to the criteria described above for the RAP, as well as other criteria appropriate to the specific

proposed action.

Comments: 75

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

166

Appendix G-Transportation Plan
Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan 167

Map Packet
GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

168

Map Packet
Map Packet

There is a supplementary map packet of 5 large maps accompanying this document.

This packet includes:

1. Map A: Land Allocations

2. Map B: Wildlife Allocations

3. Map C: WIldland Urban Intermix

4. Map D: Giant Sequoia Groves

5. Motor Vehicle Use Maps

Comments: 76

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

169

Map Packet
Index

8, 28, 55, 

86, 100

Adaptive management

31, 64, 87, 

102

Air Quality

AQUATIC RESOURCES 104

Backcountry (Inventoried Roadless 79

Areas)

Caves 80, 93, 106

Children’s Forest 71

Civil Rights and Environmental Justice 97

Climate Change 89

Communities of Color 72

Cultural Resources 37, 74, 97

Desired conditions 28, 160

ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS 103

Effectiveness monitoring 102

Facilities 49, 52, 128

31, 60, 87, 

106

Fire and Fuels

Freeman Creek Botanical Area 79

Front Country 26

Geological Resources 33, 68, 93

Giant Sequoia Groves 58, 86

Giant sequoias 13, 29

Golden Trout Wilderness 77

Great Western Divide 22

Groundwater 33, 68, 92

Human Use 36, 70, 94

Hume High Elevation 24

Hume Lake 19

Hydrological Resources 33, 66, 91

Implementation monitoring 102

Invasive Nonnative Species 90

INVASIVE PLANTS 107

Issues 128

Kings Canyon Scenic Byway 21, 80

Kings River 18

Kings River Special Management Area 15, 78

Kings River Special Management Area 27

(KRSMA)

Kings Wild and Scenic River 77

Land allocations 40

Legal and Regulatory Compliance 86

Lloyd Meadow 23

Management areas 40

Mining 47, 93

Mixed Conifer 29, 59

Monarch Wilderness 77

Monitoring 101

Monitoring and evaluation 100

Moses Mountain Research Natural Area 78

North Fork Kern Wild and Scenic River 78

NOXIOUS WEEDS 107

Objects of interest 11

Off-highway vehicle (OHV) 15

Paleontological Resources 35, 69, 94

Partnerships 36

32, 66, 91, 

107

Range

Recreation 36, 94

Recreation Niche 14

Recreation niche settings 15

Rivers and Lakes 18

Scenery 96

Scenic Routes 21

Scientific Study 28, 55, 86

Slate Mountain Botanical Area 79

Socioeconomics 96, 109

Soils 35, 69, 94

South Fork Kings Wild and Scenic River 78

South Mountaineer Creek Research Natural80

Area

Special Areas 76–77, 79

Special Forest Products 99

Standards and guidelines 8, 99

Status and trend monitoring 102

Strategies 54, 126

Strategies and Objectives 54

Suitability 47

THREATENED, ENDANGERED, AND 109

SENSITIVE (TES) PLANTS

Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive 89

Species

Transportation 98

Transportation System 37, 74, 160

Tule River 20

GSNM Management Plan Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan

Index
Validation monitoring 102

29, 56, 86, 

109

Vegetation

Western Divide Highway 22

Wildland urban intermix 31

Wildlands 25

Wildlife 89, 111

Wildlife and Plant Habitat 32, 65

Windy Gulch Geological Area 80

Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Management Plan GSNM Management Plan

Index

Copyedit and design by U.S. Forest Service, Ecosystem Management Coordination, Publishing Arts, 

http://www.fs.fed.us/emc/pa
Please recycle this document when it is ready to be discarded.