alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.14






 Exhibit 10.14 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into, effective as of
January 23, 2018 (the “Effective Date”), by and among Aveanna Healthcare LLC f/k/a BCPE Eagle Buyer LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Aveanna Healthcare”), Pediatric Services of America, Inc., a Georgia corporation
(the “Company”), and Jeffrey Shaner (“Executive”). 
 RECITALS: 

 

	 	A.	 Aveanna Healthcare, the Company and Employee are parties to that certain Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement dated as of March 15, 2017 (the “Employment Agreement”). 


  

	 	B.	 Aveanna Healthcare, the Company and Employee desire to amend the Employment Agreement. 



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter contained, the parties, intending to be legally bound,
hereby expressly agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	 Amendment. Section 4(a)(i) in the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by replacing each
reference to “$160 million” with “$140 million”. 


  

	 	2.	 Miscellaneous. 



(a)    This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which
together will constitute one and the same instrument. Any executed copy of this Amendment sent by facsimile or electronic mail (with a pdf attachment) or executed electronically shall be treated the same as an original signature copy. 

(b)    Except as modified herein, the Employment Agreement is hereby ratified and shall remain in full force and effect.
The Employment Agreement and this Amendment constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the matters set forth herein. 

(c)    This Amendment shall be effective as of the Effective Date. 

(d)    Unless the context requires otherwise, the term “Agreement” or “Employment Agreement” in the
Employment Agreement or in this Amendment shall refer to the Employment Agreement, as amended and modified by this Amendment. 
 [Signatures
on Following Page] 













 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement to be duly executed and delivered as of the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	PEDIATRIC SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Rodney D. Windley

	Name:	 	Rodney D. Windley
	Title:	 	Executive Chairman
	
	AVEANNA HEALTHCARE LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Rodney D. Windley

	Name:	 	Rodney D. Windley
	Title:	 	Executive Chairman
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	 /s/ Jeffrey Shaner

	Jeffrey Shaner

  

  
 Signature Page to First
Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SIGHT
RESOURCE CORPORATION'S BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR
THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AS REPORTED ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                       376
<INVENTORY>                                      4,718
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,988
<PP&E>                                          12,264
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,566
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,695
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,008
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,566
<SALES>                                         14,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,498
<CGS>                                            5,071
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,071
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,311
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  45
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    128
<INCOME-TAX>                                        51
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 77
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        77
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-1543 Robert M. Gates, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, Appellant,

v. RAYTHEON COMPANY,

Appellee. Appeal from the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in no. 54907,

Administrative Judge Jack Delman.

ON MOTION Upon consideration of the Secretary of Defense's unopposed motion for leave to file a corrected joint appendix, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT 

# MAR 0 4 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Date Jan Horbaly Clerk FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT MAR 0 4 2009 JAN HUlibithY CLERK cc: C. Coleman Bird, Esq. Karen L. Manos, Esq. s8
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93021, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 151.74 Retest at Center director's request.

If the Center director is not satisfied with the results of any test provided for in § 151.71 or § 151.73, he may, within 14 calendar days after receiving the report of the results of such test, proceed to have another test made upon a suitable sample of the wool or hair at the expense of the Government. When the Center director is proceeding to have another test made, he shall, within the 14-day period specified in this paragraph, notify the importer by mail of that fact.

[CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93021, Dec. 20, 2016]
#### In Re CASE, et al.

(182 N. W. 638.)

(File No. 4480.

Opinion filed April 25, 1921.)

Disbarment — Unprofessional Conduct— Allegation of Attorney’s Purchase of House on Lot, Giving Note in Part Payment, Purchasing Deceased Vendor’s Note, Agreeing to Pay Same, Then Offsetting Same Against Attorney’s Note, Filing Decedent’s Note Against Estate — Finding of Non-purchase of Lot and Nonsssumption of Decedent’s Obligation — Proceeding Dismissed.

Where, in a proceeding for disbarment, the charges allege that H. one of the respondents, bought a lot from M, and a house thereon, and in part payment agreed to pay a $225 note executed by the vendor (afterwards deceased,) and that he and *121his law partner thereafter filed said note against M’s estate; it being conceded that H. C. bought the house, and- the evidence showing that the claim against the estate was afterwards bought by respondent and off-set against a note for $100 given by H. C. as part of said purchase money; held, that if H. C. had-bought the lot and assumed and agreed to pay said $225 note, then respondents’ acts were reprehensible and unprofessional; yet, referee having properly found that H. C. did not buy the lot and did not assume- or agree to pay said obligation, respondents are exonerated from -all charges and proceeding dismissed.

Original proceeding for disbarment, against Howard B. Case and George W. 'Case.

Proceeding -dismissed.

*Byron S. Payne, Attorney General,*and *B. R. Winans,*Assistant Attorney General, for the Prosecution.

*C. G. Sherwood,*and *Case & Case,*for Respondents.

GATES, J.

The charg-e of unprofessional conduct made against respondents was that they filed as a claim against the estate of one Miles McLaughlin a promissory note of $225 executed by deceased for deferred payments upon a lot purchased by him at Le Beau, S. D. It was charged that the respondent Howard B. Case bought the lot and the house thereon from the said McLaughlin, and that, as a part of the purchase price therefor, the said Howard B. Case assumed and agreed to pay such promissory note. It was conceded that Howard B.-Case bought the house. The claim against said estate was afterwards bought by respondents and offset against the promissory note given by said Howard B. 'Case to said McLaughlin for $100 as a part of the purchase price of the house. As we view the transaction, if Howard B. Case bought the lot and assumed the above $225 obligation and agreed to pay the same then the acts of respondents were reprehensible and unprofessional. If Howard B. Case did- not buy the lot and did not assume and agree to pay such obligation, then the acts charged against respondents were not subject to criticism. The referee found, and we concur therein, that the said Howard B. Case did not buy the lot and did not assume and agree to pay that obligation.

■ The respondents are therefore exonerated from the charge filed, and the proceeding is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Judd Lee, certify that:
 
 1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K, as amended by this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A, of RealNetworks, Inc.; and
 2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
 
 Date: April 30, 2020
 
 
 /s/ Judd Lee
 Judd Lee
 Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
 (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ARBOR GLOBAL STRATEGIES, LLC,

Appellant

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., TAIWAN 

SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, 

LTD.,

Appellees

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF 

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES 

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

______________________ 

2022-1465, 2022-1466, 2022-1467

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020-

01020, IPR2020-01021, IPR2020-01022.

-------------------------------------------------

ARBOR GLOBAL STRATEGIES, LLC,

Appellant

Case: 22-1465 Document: 117 Page: 1 Filed: 07/16/2024
v.

XILINX, INC., TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR 

MANUFACTURING CO. LTD.,

Appellees

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF 

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES 

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

______________________ 

2022-1549, 2022-1550, 2022-1551, 2022-1552

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020-

01567, IPR2020-01568, IPR2020-01570, IPR2020-01571.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

DANIEL NOAH LERMAN, Kramer Levin Naftalis & 

Frankel LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also 

represented by PAUL J. ANDRE, JAMES R. HANNAH, LISA 

KOBIALKA, Redwood Shores, CA, JEFFREY PRICE, New 

York, NY. 

 JOHN C. O'QUINN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, 

DC, argued for appellees Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. 

Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd. also represented by WILLIAM 

H. BURGESS, CHRISTOPHER MIZZO; MEREDITH ZINANNI, Chicago, IL. 

 JAMES M. GLASS, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, 

Case: 22-1465 Document: 117 Page: 2 Filed: 07/16/2024
LLP, New York, NY, for appellee Taiwan Semiconductor 

Manufacturing Company, Ltd. Also represented by ERIC 

HUANG. 

 JEFFREY SHNEIDMAN, Fish & Richardson P.C., Boston, 

MA, argued for appellee Xilinx, Inc. Also represented by 

KENNETH WAYNE DARBY, DAVID M. HOFFMAN, Austin, TX; 

JOHN A. DRAGSETH, Minneapolis, MN. 

 DANA KAERSVANG, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. Also represented by BRIAN M. BOYNTON, JOSHUA MARC 

SALZMAN; MICHAEL S. FORMAN, FARHEENA YASMEEN 

RASHEED, MICHAEL TYLER, Office of the Solicitor, United 

States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (HUGHES, LINN, and STARK, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 16, 2024

Date

Case: 22-1465 Document: 117 Page: 3 Filed: 07/16/2024
#### Joice M. Gibson, Respondent, v. Walter C. Gibson, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Executive Order 12866 

and 

Congressional Review Requirements 

Rulemaking Document Title: l).X,.ct\ ^ A\.CAM.MJ C I-^SSKVLCI LS<i)*y-.^ (/U_<^ 

RIN: OS[-ZIO^'ABO\ 

With respect to the attached rulemaking document(s): 

1. E.0.12866: The requirements of section 6(a)(3)(E) of E.O. 12866 have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

A The rulemaking document(s) was not reviewed by the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). 

No substantive changes were made to the documem(s) after it was submitted to OIRA. 

The required information is attached. 

2. Congressional Review: The requirements of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 

for the submission of final rules to Congress and GAO (§ 801) have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

1 This document is not a final rule. 

This document is not a rule imder (§ 804). 

The document has been submitted to C-50 for transmission to Congress and GAO. 

u r L 

Signature 

I 

Title/Office 

^1 A'" 

Date
### §611. Common varieties of sand, stone, gravel, pumice, pumicite, or cinders, and petrified wood

No deposit of common varieties of sand, stone, gravel, pumice, pumicite, or cinders and no deposit of petrified wood shall be deemed a valuable mineral deposit within the meaning of the mining laws of the United States so as to give effective validity to any mining claim hereafter located under such mining laws: Provided, however, That nothing herein shall affect the validity of any mining location based upon discovery of some other mineral occurring in or in association with such a deposit. "Common varieties" as used in this subchapter and sections 601 and 603 of this title does not include deposits of such materials which are valuable because the deposit has some property giving it distinct and special value and does not include so-called "block pumice" which occurs in nature in pieces having one dimension of two inches or more. "Petrified wood" as used in this subchapter and sections 601 and 603 of this title means agatized, opalized, petrified, or silicified wood, or any material formed by the replacement of wood by silica or other matter.

(July 23, 1955, ch. 375, §3, 69 Stat. 368; Pub. L. 87–713, §1, Sept. 28, 1962, 76 Stat. 652.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1962—Pub. L. 87–713 defined "petrified wood", and provided that no deposit of petrified wood shall be deemed a valuable mineral deposit within the mining laws of the United States.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Regulations for Removal of Limited Quantities of Petrified Wood

Pub. L. 87–713, §2, Sept. 28, 1962, 76 Stat. 652, provided that: "The Secretary of the Interior shall provide by regulation that limited quantities of petrified wood may be removed without charge from those public lands which he shall specify."
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 240 (Friday, December 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 64421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27118]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15827 and #15828; Guam Disaster Number GU-00005]


Administrative Declaration of a Disaster for the Territory of 
Guam

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the Territory of Guam dated. 12/07/2018.
    Incident: Typhoon Mangkhut.
    Incident Period: 09/10/2018 through 09/11/2018.

DATES: Issued on 12/07/2018.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/05/2019.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/09/2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Area: Guam.
Contiguous Areas:
    None.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      4.000
  Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      2.000
  Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      7.350
  Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      3.675
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.500
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit      3.675
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.500
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 15827 8 
and for economic injury is 15828 0.
    The Territory which received an EIDL Declaration # is Guam.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

    Dated: December 7, 2018.
Linda E. McMahon,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-27118 Filed 12-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsExperimenter's data package for the descending layers rocketIn response to a proposal from Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), NASA Headquarters has approved a sounding rocket mission designed to study the physics of intermediate layers in the Earth's ionosphere at middle latitudes. The experiment will be carried out by a team of scientists and engineers from the NASA Wallops Flight Facility, SAIC, the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, and the Millstone Hill radar observatory. The mission will involve the launch of an instrumented sounding rocket from the Wallops Island rocket range in the summer of 1994, with the objective of penetrating a descending ionized layer in the E-region between altitudes of 115 and 140 km. Instrumentation aboard the rocket will measure the ion and neutral composition of the layer, its plasma density, driving wind and electric field forces, the thermal ion distribution function, and electron temperature. Depending on payload weight constraints and subject to availability, a particle detector to measure energetic ion and/or electron fluxes near the layer may also be included. This document was prepared as a reference for the NASA payload development and experiment teams, for distribution at the Project Initiation Conference (PIC). The design specifications discussed herein are therefore of a preliminary nature; the intent is to promote open discussions between experimenters and NASA engineers that will lead to a final design capable of achieving the experiment objectives.Document ID19930007272Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsEarle, Greg*(Science Applications International Corp. McLean, VA, United States)*Herrero, Fred*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD., United States)*Foster, John*(Millstone Hill Radar Observatory Westford, MA., United States)*Buonsanto, Mike*(Millstone Hill Radar Observatory Westford, MA., United States)*Satya-Narayana, P.*(Science Applications International Corp. McLean, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 9, 1992Subject CategoryGeophysicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:108591NASA-TM-108591Meeting InformationMeeting: Project Initiation ConferenceLocation: Wallops Island, VACountry: United StatesStart Date: September 9, 1992Accession Number93N16461Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930007272.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Robert Kimball, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of RealNetworks, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of RealNetworks, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of RealNetworks, Inc.

Date: March 16, 2011



|       |  |                                      
|------ |  | -------------------------------------
|       | 
|By:    |  | /S/ ROBERT KIMBALL                   
|Name:  |  | Robert Kimball                       
|Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|       |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to RealNetworks, Inc. and will be retained by RealNetworks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.