alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)
**Title:****Annual report**
 
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc:ID 1.27: M 82/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000638226
 
November 1, 2017
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs -- Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Ken Clark (Phone: 404/562-4416, E-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov)

Roger Hannah (Phone 404/562-4417, E-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov)

No: II-99-07 February 12, 1999

NRC ASKS FOR COMMENTS ON DECOMMISSIONING

OF GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH REACTOR

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is soliciting comments on Georgia Tech’s

proposed decommissioning plan for its research reactor. Comments should be provided to the

NRC within 60 days and should be addressed to the Executive Director for Operations, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555.

In July of last year, the Georgia Institute of Technology submitted an application to the NRC

for a license amendment approving the decommissioning plan for the Georgia Tech Research

Reactor, located in the north central part of the Georgia Tech campus in Atlanta. The reactor

opened in the 1960s, but has been shut down since late 1995 when fuel was removed from the site

prior to the Olympic Games in Atlanta in the summer of 1996.

If Georgia Tech’s plan demonstrates that decommissioning can be performed in

compliance with the regulations and with the proper attention to health and safety, the NRC

staff intends to approve the plan with any conditions or limitations the agency may find

necessary.

#
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0090 - Final Rule:  10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70: Financial Assurance for Materials Licensees

Accession Number: ML030840828

Date Released: Thursday, August 28, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML031320556 - SECY-03-0090 - FINAL RULE: 10 CFR PARTS 30, 40, AND 70: FINANCIAL ASSURANCE FOR MATERIALS LICENSEES (7 page(s), 6/2/2003)
    - ML031320622 - SECY-03-0090-Attachment 1-Federal Register Notice - Final Rule - 10 CFR Parts 30, 40, and 70 Financial Assurance for Materials Licensees (30 page(s), 6/2/2003)
    - ML031320699 - SECY-03-0090-Attachment 2-Regulatory Analysis - Financial Assurance for Materials Licensees (17 page(s), 6/2/2003)
    - ML030910639 - SECY-03-0090-Attachment 3-SBREFA Forms for Financial Assurance (6 page(s), 6/2/2003)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 :
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Harris Preferred Capital Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of Harris Preferred Capital Corporation as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
 4.
    
    Harris Preferred Capital Corporations other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Harris Preferred Capital Corporation and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to Harris Preferred Capital Corporation, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of Harris Preferred Capital Corporations disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in Harris Preferred Capital Corporations
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Harris Preferred Capital
Corporations most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect Harris Preferred Capital Corporations internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    Harris Preferred Capital Corporations other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Harris
Preferred Capital Corporations auditors and the audit committee of Harris Preferred Capital
Corporations board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
Harris Preferred Capital Corporations ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in Harris Preferred Capital Corporations internal controls over
financial reporting.
  /s/
Pamela C. PiarowskiPamela C. Piarowski
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10(a)(4)

                        Schedule of Employment Agreements

                                                  Form of Contract

William F Schwer                                        A
Benjamin A Oxnard, Jr                                   B
W.J. "Duffy" Smith                                      B
Walter C. Lehneis                                       B
Karen L. Mercer                                         B
Robert A. Peiser                                        C
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-02-024 April 1, 2002

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404) 562-4416 E-mail: opa2@nrc.gov

 Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417

NRC TO MEET WITH SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS SAFETY

PERFORMANCE AT HATCH NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Southern Nuclear Operating

Company officials on Thursday, April 18, to discuss the results of NRC’s annual assessment of safety

performance at the Hatch nuclear power plant.

The meeting will be held at 1:00 p.m. in the Hatch Visitor’s Center at the plant site. The public

is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be available before the meeting is adjourned

to answer any questions.

A letter sent from the NRC’s Regional Administrator to Southern Nuclear, which addresses

plant safety performance during the previous year and forms the basis of the meeting discussion, is

available from Region II Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/hat_2001q4.pdf

Current information for the two units at the Hatch plant is available at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/HAT1/hat1_chart.html

and www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/HAT2/hat2_chart.html

###
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GLOBAL
INDUSTRIES, LTD.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          36,328
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,420
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               187,394
<PP&E>                                         544,679
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 811,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,851
<BONDS>                                        192,922
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           925
<OTHER-SE>                                     399,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   811,153
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               300,909
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  263,293
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,762
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (636)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (3,168)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,532
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,532
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)


</TABLE>
§ 148.81 General provisions. ( a ) *Reciprocal privileges.* The privileges provided for in §§ 148.81 through 148.86 and § 148.90 of this chapter shall be accorded only if reciprocal privileges are granted by the foreign government involved to U.S. personnel of comparable status.
( b ) *Baggage and effects.* The term “baggage and effects,” as used in this subpart includes all articles which were in the possession of a person abroad, and are being imported in connection with his arrival, and which are intended for his bona fide personal or household use. It does not include articles imported as an accommodation to others or for sale or other commercial use.
( c ) *Aliens.* The privileges provided in this subpart shall be accorded only to alien representatives, officers, employees, and members of the armed forces of foreign governments and designated public international organizations.
( d ) *Internal revenue tax.* Any article exempted from the payment of duty under this subpart shall be exempt also from the payment of any internal revenue tax imposed upon or by reason of importation.
[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. 73-227, 38 FR 22548, Aug. 22, 1973]
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
  1.
    
    Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31,
2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB,
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of US Wireless Data, Inc.
  US Wireless Data, Inc.
 By:
    
    /s/ Thomas Rowley

Chief Executive Officer
  1.
    
    Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31,
2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB,
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of US Wireless Data, Inc.
  US Wireless Data, Inc.
 By:
    
    /s/ Christopher Dunn

Chief Financial Officer
<Page>

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective
Amendment No. 13 to the registration statement on Form N-4 (No. 33-71686) of our
report dated February 15, 2002, relating to the financial statements of First
Fortis Life Insurance Company, which appears in the Statement of Additional
Information constituting part of Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to such
registration statement. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our
report dated April 6, 2001, relating to the financial statements of First Fortis
Life Insurance Company Separate Account A, which appears in such Statement of
Additional Information. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Independent Public Accountants" in such Statement of Additional Information.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 21, 2003
AAM

- 1 3

- 342

- E April 25, 2013

Exemption No. 10234A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2011

- 0268

Mr. Keith Deschambeault

Acadian Seaplanes, LLC

2640 Main Street , P.O. Box 987

Rangeley, MA 04970

Dear Mr. Deschambeault:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption

No. 10234 . It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

B y letter dated April 22, 2013 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of Acadian Seaplanes, LLC ( Acadian Seaplanes ) for an exemption from part 120 of

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . That exemption, if granted, w ould allow

Acadian Seaplanes , which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its

safety

- sensitive employees under one testing program

.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relativ e to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a pre cedent, and any

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Acadian Seaplanes

.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10234

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the publ ic interest. Therefore, under the

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Acadi an Seaplanes are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all

times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the

Acadian Seaplanes part 135 operation, not u nder part 91.

This exemption terminates on April 30 , 201 5 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

James R. Fraser

, M.D.

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.603 Indirect materials.

An indirect material, as defined in § 10.582(m) of this subpart, will be considered to be an originating material without regard to where it is produced.

# Example.

Honduran Producer C produces good C using non-originating material A. Producer C imports non-originating rubber gloves for use by workers in the production of good C. Good C is subject to a tariff shift requirement. As provided in § 10.594(b)(1) of this subpart and General Note 29(n), each of the non-originating materials in good C must undergo the specified change in tariff classification in order for good C to be considered originating. Although non-originating material A must undergo the applicable tariff shift in order for good C to be considered originating, the rubber gloves do not because they are indirect materials and are considered originating without regard to where they are produced.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. III-01-054 November 21, 2001

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT CO. NOV. 27 

TO DISCUSS SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE OF DIESEL PROBLEM AT MINNESOTA PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet November 27 in Lisle, Illinois, with

Nuclear Management Company officials to discuss the safety significance of NRC inspection findings

concerning damage to an emergency diesel generator during testing in April at the Prairie Island

Nuclear Power Station. The two-reactor facility is located near Red Wing, Minnesota.

The meeting, called a Regulatory Conference, will be at 1 p.m. in the Third Floor Conference

Room of the NRCís Region III Office, 801 Warrenville Road, in Lisle. The meeting is open to public

observation. Members of the NRC staff will be available following the meeting to answer questions

from the public and the news media.

The NRC staff has preliminarily evaluated the findings as being ìwhiteî - having low to

moderate safety significance. The agency uses a four-color scale to evaluate inspection findings: 

green, white, yellow, and red in order of increasing safety significance.

During a test of a Unit 2 emergency diesel generator on April 9, the plant staff observed

unexpected operating conditions and shut the diesel down. Subsequently, the plant staff determined

that damage to diesel components had occurred as a result of an incompatibility of the fuel oil and the

lubricating oil used in the diesel. When the company decided that the problem could also affect the

second Unit 2 diesel generator, the plant was shut down on May 9 to repair the two diesel generators.

Unit 1 has two diesel generators of a different design and was not affected. The emergency

diesel generators are designed to supply electrical power to plant safety systems in the event of a loss

of normal electrical power sources.

An NRC inspection in May found that the plantís corrective action program had failed to

properly identify and resolve previous indications of the oil compatibility issue.

The purpose of a regulatory conference is to discuss the concern about a potential problem and

its causes, the proposed safety significance categorization, and the apparent violation. The licensee --

in this case the Nuclear Management Company -- is provided with an opportunity to clarify aspects of

the NRC inspection report, as necessary, and to outline its proposed corrective action. The NRC staff

will later make a final determination of the significance. A ìwhiteî finding can lead to additional

inspections or meetings with the company.

# # # # #
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-069 December 5, 2002

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC, DOMINION TO DISCUSS SPENT FUEL STORAGE PLANS FOR 

MILLSTONE PLANTS

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Dominion Nuclear

Connecticut, Inc., on Thursday, December 12, to discuss the company’s plans to use dry cask storage

for spent fuel at the company’s Millstone 2 and 3 nuclear power plants. The Millstone units, along

with the permanently shutdown Millstone 1 reactor, are located in Waterford, Conn.

 The meeting is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. at the Region I office, 475 Allendale Road in

King of Prussia, Pa. The public is invited to observe and will have one or more opportunities to offer

comments and/or ask questions of the NRC staff before the session is adjourned.

 At present, U.S. nuclear power plants have two options for the storage of spent nuclear fuel,

that is, fuel that has already been used in a reactor. A plant can either store fuel rods in a circulatingwater spent fuel pool or in a “dry” cask storage facility. Under the latter option, fuel is removed from

the pool after a sufficient period of time has elapsed and placed inside stainless-steel casks. Those

casks are then sealed, filled with an inert gas and transported to an outdoor concrete pad, where they

are placed inside specially designed vaults made of steel-reinforced concrete. Convective air flow

through vents at the top and bottom of the vaults helps ensure that the fuel remains properly cooled.

 Dry cask storage facilities are currently in use at nearly two dozen plant sites across the U.S.

 ###
§ 111.3 Customs business. ( a ) *Location.* Customs business must be conducted within the customs territory of the United States as defined in § 101.1 of this chapter.
( b ) *Point of contact.* A licensed customs broker, or partnership, association, or corporation, conducting customs business under a national permit must designate a knowledgeable point of contact to be available to CBP during and outside of normal operating hours to respond to customs business issues. The licensed customs broker, or partnership, association, or corporation, must maintain accurate and current point of contact information in a CBP-authorized electronic data interchange (EDI) system. If a CBP-authorized EDI system is not available, then the information must be provided in writing to the processing Center.
[CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63313, Oct. 18, 2022]