alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 4.22 Exemptions from special tonnage taxes.

Vessels of the following nations are exempted by treaties, Presidential proclamations, or orders of the Secretary of the Treasury from the payment of any higher tonnage duties than are applicable to vessels of the United States and are exempted from the payment of light money:

Algeria

Antigua and Barbuda

Arab Republic of Egypt

Argentina

Australia

Austria

Bahamas, The

Bahrain

Bangladesh

Barbados

Belgium

Belize

Bermuda

Bolivia

Brazil

Bulgaria

Burma

Canada

Chile

Colombia

Cook Islands

Costa Rica

Cuba

Cyprus

Czechoslovakia

Denmark (including the Faeroe Islands)

Dominica

Dominican Republic

Ecuador

El Salvador

Estonia

Ethiopia

Fiji

Finland

France

Gambia, The

German Democratic Republic

German Federal Republic

Ghana

Great Britain (including the Cayman Islands)

Greece

Greenland

Guatemala

Guinea, Republic of

Guyana

Haiti

Honduras

Hong Kong

Hungarian People's Republic

Iceland

India

Indonesia

Iran

Iraq

Ireland (Eire)

Israel

Italy

Ivory Coast, Republic of

Jamaica

Japan

Kenya

Korea

Kuwait

Latvia

Lebanon

Liberia

Libya

Lithuania

Luxembourg

Malaysia

Malta

Marshall Islands, Republic of

Mauritius

Mexico

Monaco

Morocco

Nauru, Republic of

Netherlands

Netherlands Antilles

New Zealand

Nicaragua

Nigeria

Norway

Oman

Pakistan

Panama

Papua New Guinea

Paraguay

People's Republic of China

Peru

Philippines

Poland

Portugal

Qatar

Rumania

Saudi Arabia

Senegal

Singapore, Republic

Somali, Republic

Spain

Sri Lanka

St. Vincent and The Grenadines

Surinam, Republic of

Sweden

Switzerland

Syrian Arab Republic

Taiwan

Thailand

Togo

Tonga

Tunisia

Turkey

Tuvalu

Union of South Africa

Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

United Arab Emirates (Abu Dhabi, Ajman, Dubai, Fujairah, Ras Al Khaimah, Sharjah, and Umm Al Qaiwain)

Uruguay

Vanuatu, Republic of

Venezuela

Yugoslavia

Zaire

[28 FR 14596, Dec. 31, 1963]

###### Editorial Note

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting § 4.22, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Department of Energy. 

# ACTION:

Notice of cancellation of Environmental Impact Statement process.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Energy (DOE) is canceling the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a proposal by Geneva Steel Company to design, construct, and operate a project known as the Clean Power from Integrated Coal/Ore Reduction (CPICOR) Project near Provo, Utah. DOE selected Geneva Steel Company's proposal for further consideration under DOE's Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Program competitive solicitation. Geneva Steel proposed constructing the demonstration project at the site of its existing steel-making operations in Provo, Utah. The proposed CPICOR project was intended to demonstrate advanced circulating fluidized bed combustion technologies using a variety of low and high sulfur coal to produce electricity. DOE published a Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS for the proposal in the                         **Federal Register**                         on June 28, 1999 (64 FR 34640), and conducted a public scoping meeting in the Council Chambers of the Provo City Center on July 15, 1999.                     

The proposed project has been discontinued. As a result, DOE is canceling the EIS process. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Lloyd Lorenzi, National Energy Technology Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, P.O. Box 10940, Pittsburgh, PA 15236-0940, telephone 412-386-6159, or electronic mail at                         *lorenzi@netl.doe.gov.*

Issued in Morgantown, WV, on this 15th day of September 2004. 

Ralph Carabetta, 

Deputy Director, National Energy Technology Laboratory. 

[FR Doc. 04-23917 Filed 10-25-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Minerals Management Service 

# AGENCY:

Minerals Management Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

List of restricted joint bidders. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to the authority vested in the Director of the MMS by the joint bidding provisions of 30 CFR 256.41, each entity within one of the following groups shall be restricted from bidding with any entity in any other of the following groups at OCS oil and gas lease sales to be held during the bidding period November 1, 2004, through April 30, 2005. The List of Restricted Joint Bidders published April 6, 2004, in the                         **Federal Register**                         at 69 FR 18105 covered the period May 1, 2004, through October 31, 2004.                     

Group I. Exxon Mobil Corporation, ExxonMobil Exploration Company 

Group II. Shell Oil Company, Shell Offshore Inc., SWEPI LP, Shell Frontier Oil and Gas Inc., Shell Consolidated Energy Resources Inc., Shell Land and Energy Company, Shell Onshore Ventures Inc., Shell Offshore Properties and Capital II, Inc., Shell Rocky Mountain Production LLC, Shell Gulf of Mexico Inc. 

Group III. BP America Production Company, BP Exploration and Production Inc., BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. 

Group IV. TOTAL E&P USA, Inc. 

Group V. ChevronTexaco Corporation, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Texaco Inc., Texaco Exploration and Production Inc. 

Group VI. ConocoPhillips Company 

Group VII. Eni Petroleum Co. Inc., Eni Petroleum Exploration Co. Inc., Eni Deepwater LLC, Eni Oil USA LLC 

Dated: September 24, 2004. 

Walter D. Cruickshank, 

Deputy Director, Minerals Management Service. 

[FR Doc. 04-23267 Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
§ 207.109 Discovery. ( a ) *Discovery methods.* All parties may obtain discovery under such terms and limitations as the administrative law judge may order. Discovery may be by one or more of the following methods: ( 1 ) Depositions upon oral examination or written questions;
( 2 ) Written interrogatories;
( 3 ) Production of documents or things for inspection and other purposes; and
( 4 ) Requests for admissions.
( b ) *Sanctions.* If a party or an officer or agent of a party fails to comply with a discovery order, the administrative law judge may take such action as he deems reasonable and appropriate, including the issuance of evidentiary sanctions or deeming the respondent to be in default.
( c ) *Depositions of nonparty officers or employees of the United States or another Free Trade Area country government* — ( 1 ) *Depositions of Commission officers or employees.* A party desiring to take the deposition of an officer or employee of the Commission (other than a member of the Office of Unfair Import Investigations or of the Office of the Administrative Law Judges), or to obtain nonprivileged documents or other physical exhibits in the custody, control, and possession of such officer or employee, shall file a written motion requesting the administrative law judge to recommend that the Commission direct that officer or employee to testify or produce the requested materials.
( 2 ) *Depositions of officers or employees of other United States agencies, or of the government of another Free Trade Area country.* A party desiring to take the deposition of an officer or employee of another agency, or of the government of another Free Trade Area country, or to obtain nonprivileged documents or other physical exhibits in the custody, control, and possession of such officer or employee, shall file a written motion requesting the administrative law judge to recommend that the Commission seek the testimony or production of requested material from the officer or employee.
No. 13,139.

#### Wakefield *v.*Alford.

(16 P. [2d] 1120)

Decided November 21, 1932.

Rehearing denied December 27, 1932.

Messrs. Moffett *&*Hitchcock, for plaintiff in error.

Mí. James R. Hoffman, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed en banc on application for supersedeas without written opinion.
§ 122.93 Procedure at destination or exportation airport. ( a ) *Delivery to port director.* When a bonded shipment arrives at the destination or exportation airport, the aircraft commander or agent shall deliver one copy of the entry and manifest (Customs Form 7512 or other Customs approved document) covering the shipment to the port director of that airport as notice of arrival. If the shipment was sent by separate aircraft more than 24 hours after the first part of the shipment was sent, then a manifest for each part of the shipment shall be delivered to the port director.
( b ) *Delivery to consignee.* When the merchandise is sent under an entry for immediate transportation without appraisal, one copy of the manifest covering the merchandise shall be delivered by the carrier to the consignee. This copy is used to make entry, and may also be used as a carrier certificate as provided in § 141.11(a)(4) of this chapter.
[T.D. 88-12, 53 FR 9292, Mar. 22, 1988; T.D. 00-22, 65 FR 16518, Mar. 29, 2000]
Editorial Note on Part 181
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 181 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93026, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 181.114 Customs response to request. ( a ) *Time for response.* The Center director will issue a written response to the requestor within 30 days of receipt of a request containing the information specified in § 181.113 of this part. If the request is incomplete, such that the transaction in question cannot be identified, the Center director will notify the requestor in writing within 30 days of receipt of the request regarding what information is needed.
( b ) *Content.* The response by the Center director shall include the following: ( 1 ) A statement concerning the basis for the adverse marking decision;
( 2 ) A copy of the relevant Customs Form 4647 (Notice to Mark and/or Notice to Redeliver), if one was issued to the importer and is available. If the basis for the adverse marking decision is indicated on the Customs Form 4647, or its electronic equivalent, no statement under paragraph (b)(1) of this section is required;
( 3 ) A statement as to whether the importer has filed a protest regarding the adverse marking decision and, if so, where the protest was filed and the protest number; and
( 4 ) A statement concerning the exporter's or producer's right to either intervene in the importer's protest as provided in § 181.115 of this part or file a petition as provided in § 181.116 of this part.
[T.D. 95-68, 60 FR 46364, Sept. 6, 1995, as amended by CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61292, Oct. 13, 2015]
The Best Oldies On The 

-

Radio · May 9, 2014 

Secretary Anthony Foxx 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Docket DOT-OST-2008-0299 

Dear Secretary Foxx, 

Station: 

420 Main St. 

El Centro, CA 92243 

(760) 352-1230 

Mailing: 

P. 0. Box 140 

El Centro, CA 92244 

rm writing to express my concerns with the Department of Transportation's Tentative Order to 

. terminate the Essential Air Service (EAS) program in El Centro, California located in Imperial 

County. I can't urge you enough to consider the negative economic impacts that may occur as 

a result of the proposed termination of the program. 

The Imperial County Airport has a tremendous track recorp of surpassing the EAS program 

requirements put forth by the government, as they have dramatically exceeded the 

enplanement minimum in four of the last five fiscal years. Unfortunately, in Fiscal Year 2013, 

the Imperial County Airport barely fell below the ten enplanement threshold, by reaching 9.5 

enplanements for the first time. 

As you know, the Essential Air Service was put into place to guarantee that small communities, 

including those within the Imperial County, continue to be served by certificated air carriers. 

Over the last several years, Imperial County has experienced the highest unemployment rate in 

the nation. Our federal government should encourage economic growth, and consider all 

factors before terminating a much-needed program in the region. 

As you prepare the Final Order, I urge you to consider the Imperial Valley's track record over 

the last three fiscal years, and ask that you consider the void that will be left should the 

Department of Transportation ultimately decide to terminate the much-needed Essential Air 

Service program currently in effect at the Imperial County Airport. 

Thank you for your time and consideration of my request. 

~4L Gene P. Brister Y I 

President/General Manager 

-

KXO AM1230/FM 107.5 Radio 

E-mail: kxoamfm@kxoradio.com • www.kxoradio.com 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                           OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.
                             A LOUISIANA CORPORATION
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Deborah C. DeRouen, certify that:

    1. I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K/A/3 of
OMNI Energy Services Corp., a Louisiana corporation (the "registrant");

    2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

    3. The registrant's other certifying officers and I, are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

        a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
     prepared;

        b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
    and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
    annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

        c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
    evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

    4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

        a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
    controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
    process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
    registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

        b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
    employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
    and

    5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

       /s/ Deborah C. DeRouen
       ----------------------------------------------------------------
       Deborah C. DeRouen
       Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

Date: September 14, 2004
Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 89 FR 20832, Mar. 25, 2024.

§ 351.312 Industrial users and consumer organizations. ( a ) *Introduction.* The URAA provides for opportunity for comment by consumer organizations and industrial users on matters relevant to a particular determination of dumping, subsidization, or injury. This section indicates under what circumstances such persons may submit relevant information and argument.
( b ) *Opportunity to submit relevant information and argument.* In an antidumping or countervailing duty proceeding under title VII of the Act and this part, an industrial user of the subject merchandise or a representative consumer organization, as described in section 777(h) of the Act, may submit relevant factual information and written argument to the Department under paragraphs (d)(3)(ii), and (d)(3)(vi), and (d)(4) of § 351.218, paragraphs (b), (c)(1), and (c)(3) of § 351.301, and paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of § 351.309 concerning dumping or a countervailing subsidy. All such submissions must be filed in accordance with § 351.303.
( c ) *Business proprietary information.* Persons described in paragraph (b) of this section may request business proprietary treatment of information under § 351.304, but will not be granted access under § 351.305 to business proprietary information submitted by other persons.
[62 FR 27379, May 19, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 13524, Mar. 20, 1998]
§ 295.10 Bringing a claim under the CGFAA. ( a ) Any Injured Person may bring a claim under the CGFAA by filing a Notice of Loss. A claim submitted on any form other than a Notice of Loss will not be accepted. The Claimant must provide a brief description of each Loss on the Notice of Loss.
( b ) A single Notice of Loss may be submitted on behalf of a Household containing Injured Persons provided that all Injured Persons on whose behalf the claim is presented are identified.
( c ) The Notice of Loss must be signed by each Claimant, if the Claimant is an individual or by a duly authorized legal representative of each Claimant, if the Claimant is an entity or an individual who lacks the legal capacity to sign the Notice of Loss. If one is signing a Notice of Loss as the legal representative of a Claimant, the signer must disclose his or her relationship to the Claimant. FEMA may require a legal representative to submit evidence of authority.
( d ) Notice of Loss forms are available from OCGFC by request. They may be obtained through the mail, in person at the OCGFC office or by telephone request. The Notice of Loss form can also be downloaded from the Internet at *http://www.fema.gov/cerrogrande .*
( e ) Notices of Loss may be filed with OCGFC by mail to P.O. Box 1480, Los Alamos, NM 87544-1480. OCGFC is unable to accept Notices of Loss submitted by facsimile or e-mail.
( f ) A Notice of Loss that is completely filled out and properly signed is deemed to be filed on the date it is received by OCGFC.
### Part I—Purpose, Policy, and Function
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 14, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40793

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

 

PATRICIO HOMERO SAENZ, JR., 

 Defendant-Appellant,

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:03-CR-485-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Patricio

Homero Saenz, Jr., has requested leave to withdraw from this

appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Saenz has received a copy of counsel’s

motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
§ 207.21 Final phase notice of scheduling. ( a ) Notice from the administering authority of an affirmative preliminary determination under section 703(b) or section 733(b) of the Act and notice from the administering authority of an affirmative final determination under section 705(a) or section 735(a) of the Act shall be deemed to occur on the date on which the transmittal letter of such determination is received by the Secretary from the administering authority or the date on which notice of such determination is published in the Federal Register, whichever shall first occur.
( b ) Upon receipt of notice from the administering authority of an affirmative preliminary determination under section 703(b) or section 733(b) of the Act or, if the administering authority's preliminary determination is negative, notice of an affirmative final determination under section 705(a) or section 735(a) of the Act, the Commission shall publish in the Federal Register a Final Phase Notice of Scheduling.
( c ) If the administering authority's preliminary determination is negative, the Director shall continue such investigative activities as the Director deems appropriate pending a final determination by the administering authority under section 705(a) or section 735(a) of the Act.
( d ) Upon receipt by the Commission of notice from the administering authority of its final negative determination under section 705(a) or section 735(a) of the Act, the corresponding Commission investigation shall be terminated.
[61 FR 37832, July 22, 1996]