alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-025 April 1, 2002

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

LICENSING BOARD TO HEAR ORAL ARGUMENTS

ON MILLSTONE SPENT FUEL POOL

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board has scheduled oral

argument on Tuesday, April 2, in Mystic, Conn., in a licensing proceeding concerning a request by

Dominion Nuclear Connecticut to amend its license for Millstone Station Unit 3 in Waterford, Conn.

The hearing, which is open to the public for observation, will begin at 9:30 a.m. at the Best

Western Sovereign Hotel, 9 Whitehall Avenue, in Mystic. 

Dominion has requested a license amendment to increase the capacity (through the addition of

high-density storage racks) of the spent fuel pool of Millstone 3. 

The Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone and the Long Island Coalition Against Millstone

petitioned to intervene. A three-member NRC Licensing Board granted the petition and is in the

process of conducting a hearing on the merits of the case.

Because oral limited appearance statements were heard on several occasions earlier in the

proceeding, they will not be entertained at this session of the hearing. Written statements may be

submitted to the Office of the Secretary, Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555. A copy should also be served on the Chairman of this Atomic

Safety and Licensing Board, T-3 F23, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555

or cxb2@nrc.gov .

# # #
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6419

ELMER CONNELL TAYLOR, Petitioner – Appellant,

v. BUTCH JACKSON, Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:07-hc-02171-H)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elmer Connell Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Elmer Connell Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition and has moved this court for a certificate of appealability. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable.

See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v.

McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Taylor has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Taylor’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00128-CV

In re Bruce Wayne Houser

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief are denied. See

Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Henson

Filed: June 15, 2007
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLSENS, a general chemical kinetics and sensitivity analysis code for gas-phase reactions: User's guideA general chemical kinetics and sensitivity analysis code for complex, homogeneous, gas-phase reactions is described. The main features of the code, LSENS, are its flexibility, efficiency and convenience in treating many different chemical reaction models. The models include static system, steady, one-dimensional, inviscid flow, shock initiated reaction, and a perfectly stirred reactor. In addition, equilibrium computations can be performed for several assigned states. An implicit numerical integration method, which works efficiently for the extremes of very fast and very slow reaction, is used for solving the 'stiff' differential equation systems that arise in chemical kinetics. For static reactions, sensitivity coefficients of all dependent variables and their temporal derivatives with respect to the initial values of dependent variables and/or the rate coefficient parameters can be computed. This paper presents descriptions of the code and its usage, and includes several illustrative example problems.Document ID19930007425Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsRadhakrishnan, Krishnan*(Sverdrup Technology, Inc. Brook Park, OH., United States)*Bittker, David A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1993Subject CategoryInorganic And Physical ChemistryReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-105851E-7299NAS 1.15:105851Accession Number93N16614Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-21Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930007425.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §6613. Advances to Sergeant at Arms of Senate for extraordinary expenses

The Secretary of the Senate on and after July 31, 1958, is authorized, in his discretion, to advance to the Sergeant at Arms of the Senate such sums as may be necessary, not exceeding $4,000, to meet any extraordinary expenses of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 85–570, July 31, 1958, 72 Stat. 442; Pub. L. 94–440, title I, §108, Oct. 1, 1976, 90 Stat. 1445; Pub. L. 95–26, title I, §104, May 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 82.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 65b of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1977—Pub. L. 95–26 struck out "during any fiscal year" after "$4,000".

1976—Pub. L. 94–440 substituted "$4,000 during any fiscal year" for "$2,000".
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-78 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-01-006 February 15, 2001

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC CHAIRMAN TO HOLD NEWS BRIEFING

FOLLOWING VISIT TO PALO VERDE

Dr. Richard Meserve, the Chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, will visit the Palo

Verde Nuclear Generating Station Thursday, February 22. Chairman Meserve will tour the plant and

meet with Arizona Public Service Co. managers and staff. He will also meet with NRC resident

inspectors responsible for the day-to-day inspection of the plant.

Chairman Meserve will meet with interested news media representatives at 1:00 p.m. in the

Energy Information Center at the plant to discuss his visit and answer any questions reporters may have

about NRC oversight of the plant. The Palo Verde plant is located about 45 miles west of Phoenix near

Wintersburg, Ariz.

Dr. Meserve was sworn in as Chairman of the NRC on October 29, 1999. Prior to that, he was

a partner in the Washington, D.C., law firm of Covington & Burling, having joined the firm in 1981.

From 1977 to 1981, he served on the White House staff as legal counsel to the President's Science and

Technology Advisor.

Dr. Meserve received a B.A. from Tufts University (magna cum laude) in 1966, a J.D. from

Harvard Law School (magna cum laude) in 1975, and a Ph.D. in applied physics from Stanford

University in 1976. He served as a law clerk to Justice Harry Blackmun of the United States Supreme

Court and before that to Judge Benjamin Kaplan of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.

Holding degrees in law and physics, the NRC Chairman has focused on a wide range of issues

during his career, including such matters as environmental law, nuclear licensing, counseling of

high-tech companies and scientific societies, nuclear non-proliferation, and declassification.

He served as chairman or a member of several National Academy of Sciences committees. For

example, just before taking his new post, Dr. Meserve was chairman of the National Academy of

Sciences committee seeking ways to bolster the protection of nuclear weapons-grade material in

Russia.

###
### §190. Oath; requirement; form; blanks

All statements, representations, or reports required by the Secretary of the Interior under this chapter shall be upon oath, unless otherwise specified by him, and in such form and upon such blanks as the Secretary of the Interior may require.

(Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, §33, 41 Stat. 450.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 181

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 181 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93026, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 181.71 Denial of preferential tariff treatment dependent on origin verification and determination.

Except where a Certificate of Origin either is not submitted when requested under § 181.22(b) of this part or is not acceptable and a corrected Certificate is not submitted or accepted as provided in § 181.22(c) of this part and except as otherwise provided in § 181.23 of this part and except in the case of a pattern of conduct provided for in § 181.76(c) of this part, Customs shall deny preferential tariff treatment on an imported good, or shall deny a post-importation claim for a refund filed under subpart D of this part, only after initiation of an origin verification under § 181.72(a) of this part which results in a determination that the imported good does not qualify as an originating good or should not be accorded such treatment for any other reason as specifically provided for elsewhere in this part.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Catherine McDonough, Respondent, against Flushing Hospital and Dispensary et al., Appellants, and State Insurance Fund, Respondent. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23629]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

October 12, 2004.

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Tuesday, October 19, 2004.

Place: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following in open session:
    Secretary of Labor on behalf of Mark Gray v. North Star Mining, 
Inc., Docket No. KENT 2001-23-D. (Issues include whether the issue 
presented by the Secretary's petition for discretionary review was 
sufficiently raised before the administration law judge so as to be 
preserved for review; and whether an operator's threats to a miner were 
coercive and violated section 105(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and 
Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 815(c)(2).)
    Any person attending this meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean Ellen, (202) 434-9950/(202) 708-
9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,
Chief Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. 04-23629 Filed 10-18-04; 3:46 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
```
### §4556. State income tax withholding; definitions

For purposes of section 4555 of this title and this section—

(1) the term "State" means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any other territory or possession of the United States;

(2) the term "Member" means a Member of the House of Representatives, the Delegates from the District of Columbia, Guam, and the Virgin Islands, and the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico; and

(3) the term "legislative days" does not include any calendar day on which the House of Representatives is not in session.

(Pub. L. 94–440, title II, §101, Oct. 1, 1976, 90 Stat. 1448.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 60e–1b of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is based on section 2 of House Resolution No. 732, Ninety-fourth Congress, Nov. 4, 1975, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 94–440.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of CFO

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Gateway, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Gateway), does hereby certify that:



| | a) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Form 10-Q) of Gateway fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gateway.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                 |  |                                                                         
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 10, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    RODERICK M. SHERWOOD III
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                 | 
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                 |  | Roderick M. Sherwood III Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 20-6363-SNOW 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

LUIS ALBERTO PATINO LINARES, 

Defendant. 

 / 

DEFENDANT S INVOCATION OF RIGHT TO SILENCE AND COUNSEL

The defendant named above does hereby invoke his rights to remain silent and 

to counsel with respect to any and all questioning or interrogation, regardless of the 

subject matter, including, but not limited to: matters that may bear on or relate to 

arrest, searches and seizures, bail, pretrial release or detention, evidence at trial, 

guilt or innocence, forfeitures; or that may be relevant to sentencing, enhanced 

punishments, factors applicable under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, restitution, 

immigration status or consequences resulting from arrest or conviction; appeals or 

other post-trial proceedings. 

The defendant requests that the U.S. Attorney ensure that this invocation of 

rights is honored, by forwarding a copy of it to all law enforcement agents, 

government officials, or employees associated with the investigation of any matters 

Case 0:20-mj-06363-LSS Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/17/2020 Page 1 of 2
2 

relating to the defendant. Any contact with the defendant must be made through the 

defendant s lawyer, undersigned counsel. 

Respectfully submitted, 

MICHAEL CARUSO 

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER 

By: s/ Juan J. Michelen 

Juan J. Michelen 

Assistant Federal Public Defender 

 Florida Bar No. 92901 

 One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 1100 

 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301-1842 

 Tel: 954-356-7436 

 E-Mail: Juan_Michelen@fd.org 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I HEREBY certify that on August 17, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing 

document is being served this day on all counsel of record via transmission of Notices 

of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for 

those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of 

Electronic Filing. 

By: s/ Juan J. Michelen 

 Juan J. Michelen 

Case 0:20-mj-06363-LSS Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/17/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### In re CADBURY LIMITED.

No. 02-1191.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 23, 2002.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. RApp. P. 42(b).
No: 23-043 July 21, 2023

CONTACT: Office of Public Affairs, 301-415-8200

U.S. and Ghana Work Together on Independent,

Transparent Nuclear Regulatory Framework

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Ghana Nuclear Regulatory Authority 

reaffirmed this week their shared commitment to continue close cooperation on nuclear safety and 

regulation.

NRC Chair Christopher T. Hanson and Ghana’s NRA Director General Nii Kwashie 

Allotey discussed their significant collaboration since the 2017 signing of an inaugural bilateral 

arrangement for cooperation and the exchange of technical information. The NRC and Ghana’s

NRA have engaged frequently on a variety of nuclear energy safety and security-related topics as 

that country develops a regulatory oversight program for nuclear power. 

“We have worked closely with Ghana’s NRA as it develops a technically competent, 

independent regulatory program in preparation of overseeing commercial nuclear power in 

Ghana,” Hanson said. “Establishing a strong and transparent regulatory framework based on high 

safety standards is a critical step toward the adoption of nuclear technologies. We have a longstanding partnership with Ghana’s regulator, and we welcome our continued collaboration as 

NRA progresses in establishing a regulatory structure.” 

Allotey also reconfirmed the strong partnership.

“We value the partnership that the NRA has forged over many years with the U.S. NRC, 

one of the world’s leading and most experienced nuclear regulators,” Allotey said. “We greatly 

value the NRC’s expertise as we seek to develop Ghana’s own strong, independent regulatory 

oversight program. International partnerships such as this provide a solid foundation for the 

NRA’s oversight programs, which will protect people and the environment and align with 

international standards and obligations.”

The NRC-NRA bilateral relationship is part of broader cooperation between the U.S. and 

Ghanaian governments as Ghana seeks to embark on creating a nuclear power program and 

establish a legal framework with the U.S. government for civil nuclear cooperation, known as a 

123 Agreement. 

During his visit to Ghana, Hanson also met with leaders in the Ghana Atomic Energy 

Commission, the Ministry of Energy, and the Ministry of Environment, Science, Technology, 

and Innovation, where he emphasized his steadfast commitment to continue working together 

and stressed the importance of regulatory independence for building public trust. 
Page | 2

The NRC strongly supports exchanges with partners around the world to share best 

practices for ensuring safe, accountable, and transparent use of nuclear energy technologies.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 25, 2023

NO. 03-22-00178-CV

Andrew Morris, Appellant

v.

Carrie Cecilia Veilleux, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, KELLY, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the divorce decree signed by the trial court on January 3, 2022. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the portion of the decree regarding the division of property between the parties. Therefore, the 

Court affirms that portion of the decree. The Court further holds that there was reversible error 

in the portion of the decree awarding appellate attorneys’ fees to appellee. Therefore, the Court 

vacates that portion of the trial court’s decree. Each party shall pay the costs of appeal incurred 

by that party, both in this Court and in the court below.
### §28j. Other requirements

#### (a) Federal Land Policy and Management Act requirements

Nothing in sections 28f to 28k of this title shall change or modify the requirements of section 314(b) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1744(b)), or the requirements of section 314(c) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1744(c)) related to filings required by section 314(b), and such requirements shall remain in effect with respect to claims, and mill or tunnel sites for which fees are required to be paid under this section.

#### (b) Omitted

#### (c) Fee adjustments

(1) The Secretary of the Interior shall adjust the fees required by sections 28f to 28k of this title to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor every 5 years after August 10, 1993, or more frequently if the Secretary determines an adjustment to be reasonable.

(2) The Secretary shall provide claimants notice of any adjustment made under this subsection not later than July 1 of any year in which the adjustment is made.

(3) A fee adjustment under this subsection shall begin to apply the first assessment year which begins after adjustment is made.

(Pub. L. 103–66, title X, §10105, Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 10105 of Pub. L. 103–66. Subsec. (b) of section 10105 of Pub. L. 103–66 amended section 28 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Similar Provisions

Similar provisions were contained in Pub. L. 102–381, title I, Oct. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 1378, 1379.
#### William E. Warren, Appellant, v. Peter Reeves Markets, Inc., Respondent.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Yan Yoorhis, JJ.