alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

I-00-06 January 19, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, 610/337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD "ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION" ON NEW REACTOR OVERSIGHT

PROGRAM AT PUBLIC MEETING IN PENNSVILLE, N.J.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with invited community leaders, industry representatives

and members of public interest groups on Wednesday, January 26, for a "roundtable" discussion of the agency's

new reactor oversight process. A pilot program for the new process is currently in use at the Salem 1 and 2 and

Hope Creek nuclear power plants in Hancock’s Bridge, N.J. The plants are operated by Public Service Electric

and Gas Company.

The meeting will be held from 7 to 9 p.m. at the Hampton Inn on Route 49 South (near the Delaware

Memorial Bridge), in Pennsville, N.J. The roundtable discussion portion of the meeting will be open for public

observation. Members of the public will have an opportunity to present their views to NRC officials afterward.

Salem 1 and 2 and Hope Creek are three of 13 plants at nine sites nationwide participating in the pilot

program, which began June 1 to allow for testing and adjustments to the new oversight process. A public meeting

is planned for each site. Following a trial period lasting several months, to determine if revisions are needed, the

process is expected to be extended next year to all 103 U.S. commercial nuclear power reactors.

The NRC is seeking input from the public on the new process, which is designed to maintain safety,

improve public confidence, increase efficiency and effectiveness, and reduce unnecessary regulatory burden. The

changes reflect, in part, improvements in nuclear power plant safety performance over the past 20 years. Plants

that perform well generally will have less regulatory oversight than plants that have problems.

In addition to Salem and Hope Creek, the pilot plant sites are: the James A. FitzPatrick plant (Scriba,

N.Y.), Shearon Harris (near Raleigh, N.C.), Sequoyah 1 and 2 (near Chattanooga, Tenn.), Prairie Island 1 and 2

( near Minneapolis, Minn.), Quad Cities 1 and 2 (near Moline, Ill.), Ft. Calhoun (near Omaha, Neb.), and

Cooper (near Nebraska City, Neb.).

Information on the new oversight program, including a list of questions that will be discussed at the

roundtable meeting, is available on the NRC web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/index.html .

#
§ 190.173 Imported duty-paid derivatives (no manufacture). When the basis for drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p) is imported duty-paid petroleum derivatives (that is, not articles manufactured under 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b)), the requirements for drawback are as follows: ( a ) *Imported duty-paid merchandise.* The imported duty-paid merchandise designated for drawback must be a “qualified article” as defined in § 190.172(a);
( b ) *Exported article.* The exported article on which drawback is claimed must be an “exported article” as defined in § 190.172(c);
( c ) *Exporter.* The exporter of the exported article must have either: ( 1 ) Imported the qualified article in at least the quantity of the exported article; or
( 2 ) Purchased or exchanged (directly or indirectly) from an importer an imported qualified article in at least the quantity of the exported article;
( d ) *Time of export.* The exported article must be exported within 180 days after the date of entry of the designated imported duty-paid merchandise; and
( e ) *Amount of drawback.* The amount of drawback payable may not exceed the amount of drawback which would be attributable to the imported qualified article under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) which serves as the basis for drawback.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diametrics Medical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David B. Kaysen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David B. KaysenDavid B. KaysenChief Executive OfficerNovember 14, 2003
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-99-04 January 13, 1999

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING ON PROPOSAL TO TERMINATE

LICENSE OF SHELWELL SERVICES, INC., HEBRON, OHIO

THIS MEETING HAS BEEN CANCELED BECAUSE OF SEVERE WEATHER

The planned Nuclear Regulatory Commission meeting today on

the license termination request by Shelwell Services, Inc., in

Heath, Ohio, has been canceled because of severe weather

conditions.

The NRC staff was to discuss the license termination

process, present an update on its reviews and inspections of the

company, receive comments from members of the public, and respond

to questions.

Shelwell Services, Inc., is located at 645 East Main Street,

Hebron, Ohio. The facility is licensed by the NRC to use

radioactive material in well-logging and tracer studies of oil

and gas wells. In January of this year, the company asked the

NRC to terminate its license, as it will no longer be using

radioactive material in its business.

A news announcement will be issued when the meeting is

rescheduled at a later date.

####
#### Walter Schultze, Appellant, v. Oscar Huttlinger, Respondent.

(No. 2.)

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §6575. Fees for copies from Senate journals

The Secretary of the Senate is entitled, for transcribing and certifying extracts from the journal of the Senate or the executive Journal of the Senate when the injunction of secrecy has been removed, except when such transcripts are required by an officer of the United States in a matter relating to the duties of his office, to receive from the persons for whom such transcripts are prepared the sum of 10 cents for each sheet containing one hundred words.

(R.S. §71; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §204(61), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1738.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 114 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

R.S. §71 derived from acts Sept. 15, 1789, ch. 14, §6, 1 Stat. 69; Aug. 8, 1846, ch. 107, §2, 9 Stat. 80; and Apr. 23, 1856, ch. 20, 11 Stat. 5.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "Secretary of the Senate is" for "Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives, respectively, are" and struck out "or from the journal of the House of Representatives," after "has been removed,".
#### § 201.9 Methods employed in obtaining information.

In obtaining information necessary to carry out its functions and duties, the Commission may employ any means authorized by law. In general, the Commission obtains pertinent information from its own files, from other agencies of the Government, through questionnaires and correspondence, through field work by members of the Commission's staff, and from testimony and other information presented at the hearings.

[27 FR 12118, Dec. 7, 1962, as amended at 44 FR 76476, Dec. 26, 1979]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 0:20-cv-61579-RKA

DEBRA BRAND,

Plaintiffs,

v.

C. R. BARD, INC., AND TISSUE 

SCIENCE LABORATORIES LIMITED

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Jason H. Okleshen, of the law firm of Greenberg Traurig, 

P.A., hereby enters an appearance of record as additional counsel for Defendant, C. R. Bard, Inc., 

in the above-styled action.

All pleadings, court filings, notices, motions, discovery requests, papers, correspondence, 

and other documents in and concerning this action should be sent to the undersigned attorney of 

record.

Respectfully submitted,

GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A.

Counsel for Defendant C. R. Bard, Inc.

777 South Flagler Drive Suite 300 East

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Telephone: (561) 650-7900

Facsimile: (561) 655-6222

By: /s/ Jason H. Okleshen

Jason H. Okleshen, Esq., FBN 496170

okleshenj@gtlaw.com

Robert R. Kane III, Esq., FBN 99488

kaner@gtlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant, C. R. Bard, Inc.

Case 0:20-cv-61579-RKA Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May 6, 2021 I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served 

this day on all counsel of record either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated 

by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized 

to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.

/s/ Jason H. Okleshen

Jason H. Okleshen

Case 0:20-cv-61579-RKA Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2021 Page 2 of 2
### §6131. Appointment of employees by Senate Majority and Minority Leaders; compensation

Effective April 1, 1977, the Majority Leader and the Minority Leader are each authorized to appoint and fix the compensation of such employees as they deem appropriate: Provided, That the gross compensation paid to such employees shall not exceed $191,700 each fiscal year for each Leader.

(Pub. L. 95–26, title I, May 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 80.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 61h–4 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1977.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Managing Political Fund Activity

Pub. L. 116–94, div. P, title XVII, §1701, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 3220, provided that: "The Majority Leader and the Minority Leader may each designate up to 2 employees of their respective leadership office staff as designees referred to in the second sentence of paragraph 1 of rule XLI of the Standing Rules of the Senate."

#### Increases in Compensation

Increases in compensation for Senate officers and employees under authority of Federal Pay Comparability Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 91–656), see Salary Directives of President pro tempore of the Senate, set out as notes under section 4571 of this title.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-050 April 22, 2002

NRC ANNOUNCES OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING ON 

DIABLO CANYON INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced an opportunity to request a hearing on an

application for a proposed independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) at the Diablo Canyon

nuclear power plant. 

The NRC staff has completed a preliminary review of an application for a specific license from

Pacific Gas and Electric Company to store spent fuel from its Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant in an

ISFSI at the plant site in San Luis Obispo County, California. The staff has determined that PG&E has

submitted sufficient information for the NRC to formally “docket,” or file, the December 21 application

and conduct a detailed review. 

A license will not be approved until the NRC has thoroughly reviewed the application and

determined that issuing a license will not constitute an unreasonable risk to public health and safety nor

pose a threat to the common defense and security. If a license is granted, it would authorize the spent

fuel, which is presently stored in a special storage pool at the site, to be placed in dry casks on concrete

storage pads for a term of up to 20 years. 

The deadline for hearing requests is May 22, 30 days after publication of a Federal Register

Notice on this subject, on April 22. By that time, requests must be filed by anyone whose interest might

be affected by the license and who wishes to participate as a party to the proceeding. 

Requests for a hearing must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications

Staff. They may also be delivered to the NRC Public Document Room at 11555 Rockville Pike,

Rockville, Maryland. Because of continuing disruptions in mail delivery service to U.S. Government

offices, petitions for leave to intervene and requests for hearing should be sent to the Secretary of the

Commission either by fax to 301-415-1101 or by email to hearingdocket@nrc.gov. A copy of the

request should also be sent by mail to the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, and by email to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov or fax to 301-

415-3725. Additionally, a copy should be sent to Lawrence F. Womack, Vice President, Nuclear
Services, Diablo Canyon Power Plant, P.O. Box 56, Avila Beach, California 93424. Additional

information about the opportunity for hearing may be found in the Federal Register notice. 

A copy of the December 21 ISFSI application is available through the NRC’s Agency-wide

Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). Help in using ADAMS is available by

contacting the NRC Public Document Room staff at 301-415-4737 or 1-800-397-4209, or by sending an

email message to pdr@nrc.gov. The application is also available for public inspection at the NRC’s

Public Document Room in Rockville, MD. 

###
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)
**Title:****Annual report fy...**
 
2002 | 2003 | 2005
 
SuDoc:ID 1.27:V 67/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000636123
 
November 1, 2017
§ 182.46 Filing of drawback claim. ( a ) *Time of filing.* A drawback claim under this subpart must be filed within 5 years after the date of importation of the goods on which drawback is claimed. No extension will be granted unless it is established that a CBP official was responsible for the untimely filing. Drawback will be allowed only if the completed good is exported within 5 years after importation of the merchandise identified or designated to support the claim.
( b ) *Method of filing.* A drawback claim must be filed electronically through a CBP-authorized electronic system (*see* § 190.51 of this chapter).
[CBP Dec. 21-10, 86 FR 35587, July 6, 2021]
#### § 143.38 [Reserved]
### §31a–2c. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 31a–2c was editorially reclassified as section 6138 of this title.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tufco
Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ James F. Robinson                
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | James F. Robinson                    
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



21
### Whiteley, Elizabeth
From: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_1._Frey@omb.eop.gov > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 20141:22 PM To: Donaldson, David Cc: McConkey, Diane; Whiteley, Elizabeth; Brown, Stephanie N.; Schillo, Bruce; Hall-Jordan, Luke; Owens, Nicole Subject: Concluding Review under EO 12866 and 13563 -- Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance System for Controlling HCFC Production, Import and Export, 2015-2019
We have concluded our review under E012866 and 13563 of the EPA final rule entitled, Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance System for Controlling HCFC Production, Import and Export, 2015-2019. Thanks very much, Nathan
From: Donaldson, David [mailto: Donaldson. David@epa.gov ] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 5:02 PM To: Frey, Nathan J. Cc: McConkey, Diane; Whiteley, Elizabeth; Brown, Stephanie N.; Schillo, Bruce; Hall-Jordan, Luke Subject: RE: Summary of Interagency Comments Under EO 12866 and 13563 -- Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance System for Controlling HCFC Production, Import and Export, 2015-2019 Nathan, The HCFC allocation rule, with revisions based on interagency comment, is attached. Please let us know if you have any questions. David From: Frey, Nathan J. fmailto:Nathan J. Frey@omb.eop.eov] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 11:21 AM To: Hall-Jordan, Luke; Donaldson, David Cc: Chamberlin, JohnB; McConkey, Diane; Whiteley, Elizabeth; Brown, Stephanie N. Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments Under EO 12866 and 13563 -- Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance System for Controlling HCFC Production, Import and Export, 2015-2019 Attached please find a summary of interagency comments under EO 12866 and 13563 regarding the EPA final rule entitled, Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance System for Controlling HCFC Production, Import and Export, 2015-2019. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Nathan
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. §1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Allegro Biodiesel Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Heng
      Chuk, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Heng ChukHeng
                ChukChief
                Financial OfficerMay
                11, 2007











A
      signed
      original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-090 August 15, 2002

NRC SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON USE OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE

RESOLUTION IN ITS ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment on the development of a pilot

program to evaluate the possible use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in its enforcement

program.

ADR is defined as any procedure that is used to resolve issues in controversy. It can involve

the use of a neutral third party to resolve conflicts that can include facilitated discussion, mediation,

fact-finding, mini-trials and arbitration. The Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Navy and the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission are among those agencies that have used these techniques

effectively. The NRC is considering using ADR in its enforcement program.

In considering the use of ADR in a pilot program yet to be designed, the NRC is seeking public

comment on whether to use it at certain points in the enforcement process, such as: (1) following

identification of wrongdoing or an allegation of discrimination, but prior to a full investigation; (2)

following an investigation that substantiates the matter, but prior to an enforcement conference; (3)

following the issuance of a Notice of Violation and proposed civil penalty, but prior to imposition of a

civil penalty; and (4) following an imposition of civil penalty, but prior to a hearing on the matter.

The staff requests that comments be focused on issues related to the implementation of a pilot

program to test the use of ADR at any of the four steps in the enforcement process, and include such

factors as what techniques would be useful at each point, what pool of neutrals might be used, who

should attend the ADR sessions, and what ground rules should apply. Also, the staff requests that

comments be focused on the pros and cons of using ADR at points in the enforcement process and in

maintaining safety, increasing public confidence, and maintaining the effectiveness of the enforcement

program.

Written comments can be sent to Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, Division of

Administrative Services, Office of Administration, Mail Stop T-6D59, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Comments may also be submitted to nrcrep@nrc.gov. 

All comments should be submitted within 60 days of publication of a Federal Register notice, expected

shortly.
The NRC also plans to hold several public meetings and workshops between September 2 and

October 14 in Hanford, Washington; Chicago, Illinois; San Diego, California; New Orleans, Louisiana;

and Washington, D.C. on the possible use of ADR. Specific dates and meeting locations will be

announced on the NRC’s Office of Enforcement web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/regulatory/enforcement.html.

###