alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Department of Energy. 

# ACTION:

Notice of cancellation of Environmental Impact Statement Process. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Energy (DOE) is canceling the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a proposal by the City of Lakeland to design, construct, and operate a project known as the McIntosh Unit 4 Pressurized Circulating Fluidized Bed Demonstration Project in Lakeland, Florida. DOE selected the City of Lakeland's proposal for further consideration under DOE's Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Program competitive solicitation. The City of Lakeland proposed constructing the demonstration project at the site of the existing C.D. McIntosh Junior Power Plant along the northeastern shore of Lake Parker. The proposed project was intended to demonstrate advanced circulating fluidized bed combustion technologies using a variety of low and high sulfur coal to produce electricity. DOE published a Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS for the proposal in the                         **Federal Register**                         on March 26, 1999 (64 FR 14710), and conducted a public scoping meeting in the City of Lakeland's City Commission Chambers on April 13, 1999. The proposed project has been discontinued. As a result, DOE is canceling the EIS process.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:

                        Lloyd Lorenzi, National Energy Technology Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, P.O. Box 10940, Pittsburgh, PA 15236-0940, telephone (412) 386-6159, or electronic mail at                         *lorenzi@netl.doe.gov.*

Issued in Morgantown, WV, on this 15th day of September, 2004. 

Ralph Carabetta, 

Deputy Director, National Energy Technology Laboratory. 

[FR Doc. 04-23918 Filed 10-25-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tufco Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersignedPresident and Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.   Date: August 13, 2004 /s/ Louis LeCalsey, III   Louis LeCalsey, III President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         434,210
<SECURITIES>                                    99,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  249,032
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,450,931
<PP&E>                                         938,182
<DEPRECIATION>                                 459,924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,007,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          289,942
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           408
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,772,721
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,007,349
<SALES>                                        103,702
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,702
<CGS>                                          361,711
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,566,345
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,428,507)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,428,507)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,428,507)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,428,507)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.34)
        


</TABLE>
### §437c. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 437c was editorially reclassified as section 30106 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-16-00165-CV

____________________

MICHAEL DAVID BELLOW JR., Appellant

V.

LEEANN MCQUADE, Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 172nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. E-198,048

________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

Appellant, Michael David Bellow Jr., filed a notice of bankruptcy.1 See Tex. 

R. App. P. 8.1. This proceeding is abated for administrative purposes only, and will 

be treated as a closed case unless timely reinstated by proper motion. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 8.2.

ORDER ENTERED October 13, 2016.

 PER CURIAM

 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

 1 We take judicial notice of the notice that Bellow filed in his Appeal 

Number 09-16-00252-CV, Michael David Bellow Jr. v. Courtney Bellow.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. III-03-027 (revised No. III-03-024) April 4, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

 

NRC TO MEET WITH OFFICIALS FROM NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

TO DISCUSS SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT PRAIRIE ISLAND

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials from the Nuclear

Management Company on Tuesday, April 8, to discuss the results of NRC's annual assessment of the

Prairie Island nuclear power plant, located in Welch, Minnesota.

The meeting will be held at 7 p.m. in the Prairie Island Training Center Auditorium, 1717

Wakonade Drive East, in Welch. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will

be available before the conclusion of the meeting for questions and comments from the public.

A letter from the NRC to the Nuclear Management Company addresses plant safety

performance during the previous year and forms the basis for the meeting discussions. The letter

states that, overall, Prairie Island operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety. 

The letter also talks about a finding of low to moderate safety significance, associated with the

lubrication water source for the safety-related cooling water pumps. The NRC conducted a special

inspection on this issue, which was originally identified in 2000, in the second quarter of 2002, and

concluded that it has been successfully resolved. No follow-up inspections are planned.

The letter also states, “Additionally, on December 13, 2002, the staff issued a Severity Level III

Notice of Violation and a Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in accordance with the enforcement

policy. The action was issued for incomplete and inaccurate information provided in April 2001 as part

of a request for a Notice of Enforcement Discretion.”

The assessment letter is available from Region III Public Affairs Office and on the NRC web

site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/prai_2002q4.pdf

In addition, the letter notes: "As you are aware, since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001,

the NRC has issued several Orders and threat advisories to enhance security capabilities and improve guard

force readiness. We have conducted inspections to review your implementation of these requirements and

have monitored your actions in response to changing threat advisories. For calendar Year 2003, we plan

to continue these inspections and conduct portions of the security baseline inspection program, as well as

perform additional inspections to evaluate your compliance with new requirements that may be ordered."
Current performance information for Prairie Island is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html

###
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,522,944
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  139,348
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (15,979)
<INVENTORY>                                    634,938
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,351,614
<PP&E>                                         526,461
<DEPRECIATION>                                 384,128
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,927,977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,718,288
<BONDS>                                        2,707,941
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9,221,420
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10,719,671)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,927,977
<SALES>                                        94,899
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,307
<CGS>                                          52,774
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,239,474
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             243,782
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,419,722)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,419,722)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,419,722)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.15)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Ener1, Inc., a Florida corporation (the
Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Gerard A. Herlihy, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Gerard A.
  Herlihy


Gerard A.
Herlihy


Chief
Financial Officer


(Duly
Authorized Principal Financial and Principal


Accounting
Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)





August 5,
2010





[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Ener1, Inc. and will be retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
### §4551. Day for paying salaries of the House of Representatives

The usual day for paying salaries in or under the House of Representatives shall be the last day of each month, except that if the last day of a month falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or a legal public holiday, the Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives shall pay such salaries on the first weekday which precedes the last day.

(Pub. L. 107–68, title I, §116(a), Nov. 12, 2001, 115 Stat. 573.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 60d–1 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Congressional Operations Appropriations Act, 2002, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2002.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 107–68, title I, §116(c), Nov. 12, 2001, 115 Stat. 573, provided that: "This section [enacting this section and repealing sections 60d, 60e, and 60e–1 of this title] and the amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to pay periods beginning after the expiration of the 1-year period which begins on the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 12, 2001]."
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                                  MIDAS, INC.
                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                          AS OF THE DISTRIBUTION DATE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                    Percentage of
                                                                        stock
                                                                       owned or
                                                 Place of           controlled by
            Name                               Incorporation        The Registrant
            ----                               -------------        --------------
<S>                                            <C>                  <C>
Midas, Inc. (Registrant).......................   Delaware               100
Midas International Corporation................   Delaware               100
Midas Euro, Inc................................   Delaware               100
Midas FSC, Inc.................................   Barbados               100
Midas Realty Corporation.......................   Delaware               100
Midas Properties, Inc..........................   New York               100
Muffler Corporation of America.................   Illinois               100
Midas Muffler (Vic.) Pty. Ltd..................   Australia              100
Midas Australia Pty. Ltd.......................   Australia              100
Midas Illinois, Inc............................   Illinois               100
Midas Europe S.A.M.............................   Monaco                 100
Midas Italy, Inc...............................   Delaware               100
Midas Italia S.R.L.............................   Italy                  100
Midas Spain, Inc...............................   Delaware               100
MDS Automotive Holdings B.V....................   Netherlands            100
Midas Automotive International B.V.............   Netherlands            100
Midas France S.A...............................   France                 100
Midas S.A......................................   Belgium                100
Carex Uitlaatcenter N.V........................   Belgium                100
Midas Canada Holdings, Ltd.....................   Canada                 100
Midas Canada, Inc..............................   Canada                 100
Midas Silenciador, S.A.........................   Spain                  100
Midas Realty Corp. of Canada, Inc..............   Canada                 100
Midas Autoservice GmbH.........................   Austria                100
Midas Schweiz AG...............................   Switzerland            100
</TABLE>

The names of certain subsidiaries are omitted because such subsidiaries, 
considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a 
significant subsidiary.
### **CHAPTER 95—GOVERNMENT PENSION PLAN PROTECTION**

Sec.
9501.
Purpose.
9502.
Definitions.
9503.
Reports about Government pension plans.
9504.
Review and recommendations.
### §61g–5. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 61g–5 was editorially reclassified as section 6152 of this title.
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333 – 65543 and 333 – 108085) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333 – 104702 and 333-129073) of our report dated March 14, 2006 relating to the consolidated financial statements, management’s assessmentof the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this annual report on Form 10-K. 

PricewaterhouseCoopers Sp. z o.o. 

Warsaw, Poland 

March 14, 2006
#### § 190.165 No exportation by mail.

Merchandise covered by this subpart must not be exported by mail.
### §111. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 111 was editorially reclassified as section 4102 of this title.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel Eduardo ALONSO-OCHOA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-10351.

D.C. No. CR-00-00433-PMP.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 24, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, WARDLAW and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, AlonsoOchoa’s request for oral argument is denied.

*616MEMORANDUM **

Manuel Eduardo Alonso-Ochoa appeals the 57-month sentence imposed after his conviction for unlawful re-entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we affirm.

Alonso-Ochoa first contends the district court erred in assessing criminal history points for his prior juvenile conviction. Specifically, he attacks the constitutional validity of the conviction, based upon the absence of any indication in the record of counsel or a waiver. We review de novo a district court’s determination that a particular prior conviction may be used in calculating a defendant’s criminal history score, see *United States v. Allen,*153 F.3d 1037, 1040 (9th Cir.1998), and find no error.

Because the ultimate burden of proof in demonstrating the constitutional infirmity of a prior conviction lies with the defendant, Alonso-Ochoa cannot satisfy his burden of proving the constitutional invalidity of a prior conviction by pointing to a silent or ambiguous record. *See id.*at 1041.

Alonso-Ochoa next contends the district court erred under *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because his prior aggravated felony conviction was not alleged in the indictment. Alonso-Ochoa’s contention is foreclosed by *United States v. Pacheco-Zepada,*234 F.3d 411, 414-15 (9th Cir.2000), *cert. denied,*532 U.S. 966, 121 S.Ct. 1503, 149 L.Ed.2d 388 (2001), which stated *Apprendi*did not overrule *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
### §1753. Relation to other laws

#### (a) Supplemental nature of chapter

The penalties and authorities provided in this chapter are supplemental to, and not in derogation of, any penalties or authorities contained in any other provision of law.

#### (b) Responsibilities of Secretary related to minerals on Federal and Indian lands

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to reduce the responsibilities of the Secretary to ensure prompt and proper collection of revenues from coal, uranium and other energy and nonenergy minerals on Federal and Indian lands, or to restrain the Secretary from entering into cooperative agreements or other appropriate arrangements with States and Indian tribes to share royalty management responsibilities and activities for such minerals under existing authorities.

#### (c) Authority and responsibilities of Inspector General and Comptroller General unaffected

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to enlarge, diminish, or otherwise affect the authority or responsibility of the Inspector General of the Department of the Interior or of the Comptroller General of the United States.

#### (d) Lands and land interests entrusted to Tennessee Valley Authority unaffected

No provision of this chapter impairs or affects lands and interests in land entrusted to the Tennessee Valley Authority.

(Pub. L. 97–451, title III, §304, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2461; Pub. L. 105–362, title IX, §901(j)(2), Nov. 10, 1998, 112 Stat. 3290.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 105–362 substituted "Nothing" for "Except as expressly provided in section 1752(b) of this title, nothing".
### §28e. Recordation of deferment

Claimant shall file or record or cause to be filed or recorded in the office where the notice or certificate of location of such claim or group of claims is filed or recorded, a notice to the public of claimant's petition to the Secretary of the Interior for deferment under sections 28b to 28e of this title, and of the order or decision disposing of such petition.

(June 21, 1949, ch. 232, §4, 63 Stat. 215.)