alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      16,859,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     199,999,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,230,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                101,630,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     139,984,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       140,697,000
<LOANS>                                    144,267,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                 (2,722,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             315,241,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 277,471,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                 5,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,848,000
<LONG-TERM>                                 10,304,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,652,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,966,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             315,241,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,404,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,787,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               146,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,337,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,770,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,117,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,220,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   45,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             173,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,312,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                395,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     395,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   294,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.84
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,678,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,000
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,722,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,722,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
#### § 191.84 Protests.

Procedures to protest the denial, in whole or in part, of a drawback entry shall be in accordance with part 174 of this chapter (19 CFR part 174).
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(a)

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the references made to our firm under the caption "Financial
Statements" and to the use of our reports as follows: our report dated March 29,
2002 (except for footnote 7, as to which the date is December 20, 2002), with
respect to the financial statements of the Separate Account Franklin Life
Variable Annuity Fund of The Franklin Life Insurance Company ("The Franklin");
our report dated February 1, 2002 (except for footnote 14, as to which the date
is December 20, 2002), with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
American General Life Insurance Company ("AGL"); our report dated May 3, 2002
(except for footnote 15, as to which the date is December 20, 2002), with
respect to the statutory-basis financial statements of All American Life
Insurance Company; our report dated February 5, 2002 (except for footnote 12, as
to which the date is December 20, 2002), with respect to the financial
statements of The American Franklin Life Insurance Company; and our report dated
February 5, 2002 (except for footnote 14, as to which the date is December 20,
2002), with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Franklin;
all included in the Form N-4 Registration Statement Amendment No. 24 under the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (Registration No. 811-01990), and also under the
Securities Act of 1933, to be filed by the Registrant, AGL Separate Account
VA-2, with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 31, 2002.



                                                /s/  ERNST & YOUNG, LLP
                                                ------------------------------

Houston, Texas
December 30, 2002
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-02-035 June 28, 2002

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: opa2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE IN ATLANTA

ON JULY 2 WITH EASTERN ISOTOPES, INC., OF ASHBURN, VIRGINIA

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a predecisional enforcement conference in

Atlanta on July 2 with Eastern Isotopes, Inc., of Ashburn, Virginia, to discuss an apparent violation of

NRC license requirements related to an overexposure to fingers on the hand of a nuclear pharmacist at

a company facility at Sterling, Virginia.

The conference is scheduled to be held from 1:00 to 3:00 p.m. at the NRC Region II office,

located at 61 Forsyth Street, S. W., Suite 23T140, in Atlanta. During the conference, the licensee will

be given the opportunity to address the apparent violation.

The conference is open to the public, and interested observers are invited to attend.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that a

determination has been made that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. 

The purpose is to discuss the apparent violation, its cause and safety significance, to provide the

licensee with an opportunity to point out errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report

and to enable the company to outline its corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violation or any contemplated enforcement action, such as a civil

penalty, will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a later time.

A copy of the letter to Eastern Isotopes from the NRC regarding this conference can be

obtained from the Region II Office of Public Affairs at the above address or by Internet from the

NRC’s electronic reading room at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html .

###
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

No. III-00-59 October 24, 2000

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH PLANT OFFICIALS ON OCTOBER 30 TO DISCUSS

D.C. COOK UNIT 1 RESTART ACTIVITIES

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff members will meet with American Electric Power

Company officials on Monday, October 30, to discuss the status of D.C. Cook Nuclear Power Station’s

preparations for resuming operations of its Unit 1 reactor in southwest Michigan.

The meeting will begin at 1 p.m. EST in the D.C. Cook plant’s Training Building. The plant is

located at 7700 Red Arrow Highway between Bridgman and Stevensville. NRC and plant officials

have been meeting periodically with utility officials to discuss the status of Unit 1 restart activities and

the operational performance of Unit 2. This meeting is open to public observation and NRC staff

members will be available after the meeting to answer questions.

The plant has two reactor units. Unit 2 restarted in late June. AEP officials have targeted the

early part of next year to restart Unit 1. However, in an AEP news release issued in late September,

company officials stated that they had asked the NRC to prepare for the possibility of an earlier restart.

Both units were shut down in September 1997 after an NRC design inspection questioned the

capabilities of key plant emergency systems to meet their design requirements.

###
```

[106th Congress Public Law 341]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ341.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 1315]]

Public Law 106-341
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
301 Green Street in Fayetteville, North Carolina, as the ``J.L. Dawkins 
     Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 19, 2000 -  [H.R. 4658]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 301 
Green Street in Fayetteville, North Carolina, shall be known and 
designated as the ``J.L. Dawkins Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``J.L. Dawkins Post Office 
Building''.

    Approved October 19, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4658:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            July 11, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 207.120 Public notice of sanctions.

If the final Commission decision is that there has been a prohibited act, and that public sanctions are to be imposed, notice of the decision will be published in the Federal Register and forwarded to the Secretariat. Such publication will occur no sooner than fourteen (14) days after issuance of a final decision or after any motion for reconsideration has been denied. The Commission Secretary shall also serve notice of the Commission decision upon such departments and agencies of the United States, Canadian and Mexican governments as the Commission deems appropriate.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI-DADE DIVISION 

STONE TECHNOLOGY (HK) CO., LTD., 

 CASE NO.: 1:20-cv-23251-BB 

 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, 

v 

GLOBALGEEKS, INC., 

 Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. 

______________________________________ 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

 Stone Technology (HK) Co., Ltd. (“Stone”) and GlobalGeeks, Inc. (“GlobalGeeks”), per 

Order (DE 133) and Order (DE 153), hereby jointly file this Notice of Settlement. 

 WHEREAS, on September 29, 2021, Stone and GlobalGeeks executed a settlement 

agreement resolving all claims between them. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties and/or their 

respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is SETTLED. No party shall claim as prevailing party in the instant case. 

Respectfully submitted on Sep. 29, 2021. 

 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:20-cv-23251-BB Document 189 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/29/2021 Page 1 of 2
 and

/s/ Jianyin Liu, Esq. 

Jianyin Liu, Esq. 

Florida Bar No 1007675 

THE LAW OFFICES OF JAMES LIU, PLLC 

15750 SW 92nd Avenue, Unit 20C 

Palmetto Bay, FL 33157 

Email: jamesliulaw@gmail.com

Dated: September 29, 2021

 /s/ Glen M. Lindsay

Glen M. Lindsay, Esq. 

Florida Bar No.: 59200 

SAAVEDRA | GOODWIN

312 SE 17th Street 

2nd Floor 

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 

Tel.: (954) 767-6333 

Fax: (954) 767-8111 

Email: glindsay@saavlaw.com 

Service Email: eservice@saavlaw.com

and 

Benjamin J. Eichel, Esq.* 

BONI, ZACK & SNYDER, LLC 

15 St. Asaphs Rd. 

Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 

Tel: 610.822.0200 

Email: beichel@bonizack.com 

Attorneys for GlobalGeeks, Inc.

*Admitted pro hac vice

 Page 2 of 2

Case 1:20-cv-23251-BB Document 189 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/29/2021 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.2


                           GREG MANNING AUCTIONS, INC.
                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Greg Manning Auctions,
Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2002, I, Larry Crawford, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Greg Manning Auctions, Inc., hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   this Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies
          with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended
          December 31, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
          financial condition and results of operations of Greg Manning
          Auctions, Inc.


Dated:  February 6, 2003

                                    /s/ Larry Crawford
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Larry Crawford, Executive Vice President
                                    and Chief Financial Officer
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone 301/415-820

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-091 July 10, 2003

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING JULY 17 ON REACTOR VESSEL

LEAKAGE AT SOUTH TEXAS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with the South Texas Project Nuclear

Operating Company on July 17 in Rockville, Md., to discuss the ongoing evaluation of leakage at

the bottom of the reactor vessel in South Texas Project Unit 1, located about 12 miles from Bay

City, Texas.

The meeting will be held in the Commission Meeting Room on the first floor of One

White Flint, 11555 Rockville Pike, from 8 a.m. until 2:30 p.m. Meeting topics will include the

current status, progress on determining the leakage’s root cause, and details on the repairs used. 

NRC staff will be available for comments or questions from the public before the meeting

adjourns. Those unable to attend may listen in via teleconference by calling 800/455-0040; the

call leader's name is Mohan Thadani and the passcode is SOUTH TEXAS.

To pre-register, request more information or inquire about schedule changes, contact

Mohan Thadani at 301/415-1476.

###
**Exhibit 12.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Thomas Thuresson,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 20-F of Alfa Laval Special Finance AB;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4. The company’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

 

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the company’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The company’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: April 23, 2004

 
|   | /s/  Thomas Thuresson |   |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas Thuresson           |
|   | Chief Financial Officer    |

 

1

----
§ 191.192 Certification for compliance program. ( a ) *General.* A party may be certified as a participant in the drawback compliance program after meeting the core requirements established under the program, or after negotiating an alternative drawback compliance program suited to the needs of both the party and Customs. Certification requirements shall take into account the size and nature of the party's drawback program, the type of drawback claims filed, and the volume of claims filed. Whether the party is a drawback claimant, a broker, or one that provides data and documentation on which a drawback claim is based, will also be considered.
( b ) *Core requirements of program.* In order to be certified as a participant in the drawback compliance program or negotiated alternative drawback compliance program, the party must be able to demonstrate that it: ( 1 ) Understands the legal requirements for filing claims, including the nature of the records that are required to be maintained and produced and the time periods involved;
( 2 ) Has in place procedures that explain the Customs requirements to those employees involved in the preparation of claims, and the maintenance and production of required records;
( 3 ) Has in place procedures regarding the preparation of claims and maintenance of required records, and the production of such records to Customs;
( 4 ) Has designated a dependable individual or individuals who will be responsible for compliance under the program, and maintenance and production of required records;
( 5 ) Has in place a record maintenance program approved by Customs regarding original records, or if approved by Customs, alternative records or recordkeeping formats for other than the original records; and
( 6 ) Has procedures for notifying Customs of variances in, or violations of, the drawback compliance or other alternative negotiated drawback compliance program, and for taking corrective action when notified by Customs of violations and problems regarding such program.
( c ) *Broker certification.* A Customs broker may be certified as a participant in the drawback compliance program only on behalf of a given claimant (see § 191.194(b)). To do so, a Customs broker who is employed to assist a claimant in filing for drawback must be able to demonstrate, for and on behalf of such claimant, conformity with the core requirements of the drawback compliance program as set forth in paragraph (b) of this section. The broker shall ensure that the claimant has the necessary documentation and records to support the drawback compliance program established on its behalf, and that claims to be filed under the program are reviewed by the broker for accuracy and completeness.
###### Editorial Note on Part 159

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93023, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 159.35 Certified daily rate.

The daily buying rate of foreign currency which is determined by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and certified to the Secretary of the Treasury in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 5151(e) shall be used for the conversion of foreign currency whenever a proclaimed rate or certified quarterly rate is not applicable under the provisions of §§ 159.33 and 159.34. If the date of exportation is one on which banks are generally closed in New York City, then the certified daily rate for the last preceding business day shall be considered the certified daily rate for the day of exportation.

[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17482, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 97-82, 62 FR 51771, Oct. 3, 1997]
Editorial Note on Part 141
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 141.82 Invoice for installment shipments arriving within a period of 10 days. ( a ) *One invoice sufficient.* Installments of a shipment covered by a single order or contract and shipped from one consignor to one consignee may be included in one invoice if the installments arrive at the port of entry by any means of transportation within a period of not to exceed 10 consecutive days.
( b ) *Preparation of invoice.* The invoice must be prepared in the manner provided for in this subpart and, when practicable, must show the quantities, values, and other invoice data with respect to each installment, the date of shipment of each installment, and the car number or other identification of the importing conveyance in which it was shipped.
( c ) *Pro forma invoice.* If the required invoice is not filed with the first entry of an installment series, a pro forma invoice must be filed with each entry made before the required invoice is produced, and in accordance with § 141.91 a bond must be given, or charge against a continuous bond made, for the production of the required invoice. Liquidated damages will accrue in the case of each entry if more than 6 months expire without the production of an invoice for such entry.
( d ) *Informal entry.* Any bona fide installment valued at not over $2,500 (except for articles valued in excess of $250 classified in Chapter 99, Subchapters III and IV. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States) may be entered on an informal entry in accordance with subpart C of part 143 of this chapter, in which case such installment need not be considered in connection with invoice requirements for the balance of the series.
[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17447, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 75-27, 40 FR 3449, Jan. 22, 1975; T.D. 78-53, 43 FR 6069, Feb. 13, 1978; T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41184, Oct. 19, 1984; T.D. 85-123, 50 FR 29954, July 23, 1985; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51256, Dec. 21, 1988; T.D. 89-82, 54 FR 36026, Aug. 31, 1989; T.D. 93-66, 58 FR 44130, Aug. 19, 1993; T.D. 98-28, 63 FR 16417, Apr. 3, 1998; CBP Dec. 12-19, 77 FR 72720, Dec. 6, 2012]
### SUBCHAPTER II—CONGRESSIONAL RECOGNITION FOR EXCELLENCE IN ARTS EDUCATION