alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          48,122
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           7,700
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    529,230
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,685,550
<ALLOWANCE>                                     28,297
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,381,607
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,848,340
<SHORT-TERM>                                   302,035
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             27,688
<LONG-TERM>                                     75,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           205
<OTHER-SE>                                     128,089
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,381,607
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                130,869
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               37,429
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               168,298
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              70,576
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              94,787
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           73,511
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 124
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 12,026
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,876
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      34,876
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (257)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,992
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.92
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,730
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,083
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                27,901
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,853
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,909
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               28,297
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            28,297
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 594 

To double the existing penalties for the provision of misleading or inaccurate 

caller identification information. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 4, 2021 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Ms. SINEMA, Mr. HAWLEY, and Mr. PETERS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To double the existing penalties for the provision of 

misleading or inaccurate caller identification information. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Anti-Spoofing Pen5 alties Modernization Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASING PENALTIES FOR SPOOFERS. 

7 Section 227(e)(5) of the Communications Act of 

8 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227(e)(5)) is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (A)(i)— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 594 IS

1 (A) by striking ‘‘$10,000’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘$20,000’’; and 

3 (B) by striking ‘‘$1,000,000’’ and insert4 ing ‘‘$2,000,000’’; and 

5 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘$10,000’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘$20,000’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

JOHN WESLEY LEGGETT, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 286 WAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 26th day of October, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

and Application to File Supplement are DENIED.
### §214. Use of surface of other public lands; acreage; forest lands exception

The holder of any lease or permit issued under the provisions of sections 211 to 214 of this title shall have the right to use so much of the surface of unappropriated and unentered public lands not a part of his lease or permit, not exceeding eighty acres in area, as may be determined by the Secretary to be necessary or convenient for the extraction, treatment, and removal of the mineral deposits, but this provision shall not be applicable to national forest lands.

(Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, §12, 41 Stat. 441; June 3, 1948, ch. 379, §5, 62 Stat. 291; Pub. L. 86–391, §1(b), Mar. 18, 1960, 74 Stat. 8.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1960—Pub. L. 86–391 substituted "lease or permit" for "lease" in two places.

1948—Act June 3, 1948, increased lands to be used from 40 to 80 acres, excepted national forest lands from its provisions, and substituted "The holder of any lease issued under the provisions of sections 211 to 214 of this title", "public lands not a part of his lease", and "or convenient for the extraction" for "Any qualified applicant to whom the Secretary of the Interior may grant a lease to develop and extract phosphates, or phosphate rock, under the provisions of this chapter", "lands", and "for the proper prospecting for or development, extraction", respectively.
### SUBCHAPTER II—CLAIMS OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
#### § 10000.3 Availability of records.

Records that are required by the FOIA to be made available for public inspection and copying may be accessed through the Agency's Web site at *www.ncd.gov.* The Council is responsible for determining which of its records are required to be made publicly available, as well as identifying additional records of interest to the public that are appropriate for public disclosure, and for posting and indexing such records. The Council shall ensure that its Web site of posted records and indices is reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis. The Council's FOIA Public Liaison can assist individuals in locating records particular to a component.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 28, 2018

a0927

Order 

Clerk

September 28, 2018

157196

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 157196

COA: 332900

St. Clair CC: 15-002302-FC

ELIZABETH LONG,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-056 September 14, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC ISSUES FINDING OF LOW TO MODERATE SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE 

TO SUSQUEHANNA NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has determined that a violation of NRC regulations

at Susquehanna Steam Electric Station in Berwick, Pa., should be characterized as ìwhite,î meaning

that it is an issue of low to moderate importance to safety but one which may require additional NRC

inspections. The plant is operated by PPL Susquehanna, LLC.

The violation concerned several occasions when on-shift staffing was below the minimum onshift staffing requirements as defined in the plantís emergency plan. At the reduced on-shift staffing

levels certain emergency preparedness functions for an emergency at the site, including monitoring the

unaffected unit for safety and operations support center coordination duties, would not be met.

Under the significance determination process, NRC officials classify certain conditions at

nuclear power plants as being one of four colors which delineate increasing levels of severity,

beginning with green and progressing in severity to white, yellow or red.

A preliminary ìwhiteî finding was described in an inspection report dated August 10 of this

year. The letter transmitting the report provided the company with an opportunity to either request a

regulatory conference to discuss this issue or to respond in writing. The company declined the

conference and did not contest the characterization of the risk significance of this finding. 

In a letter to the company, Region I Administrator Hubert J. Miller said, while the company

revised the procedure in question, ìour ongoing inspections indicate that some emergency plan staffing

problems have recurred on a few occasions since our May/June inspection.î 

The company is required to respond in writing, detailing its immediate and long-term corrective

actions. 

Because this violation falls into the regulatory response band of the NRCís oversight process,

Susquehanna may be subject to increased NRC oversight such as additional meetings or inspections. 

The agency will determine the most appropriate response and notify the company once that

determination has been made. 

###
§ 151.13 Reconsideration of amount authorized for payment. ( a ) If the claimant elects to protest the amount authorized for payment, after the applicable procedures of § 151.12 have been followed, it must within 30 days of receipt of notification of the amount authorized notify the Administrator in writing of its objections and set forth the reasons why the Administrator should reconsider the determination. The Administrator will upon notice of protest and receipt of additional evidence reconsider the determination of the amount of Federal payments under § 151.12(a)(2) but not the determination of the amount of costs under § 151.12(a)(1). The Administrator shall cause a reconsideration by the Secretary of the Treasury of the amount actually available and authorized for payment by the Treasury. The Administrator, upon receipt of the Secretary of the Treasury's reconsidered determination, will notify the claimant in writing of the amount authorized, upon reconsideration, for payment in full settlement of the claim.
( b ) If the claimant elects to accept the amount authorized, upon reconsideration, for payment in full settlement of its claims, it must within 30 days (or a longer period of time acceptable to the Administrator) of its receipt of that determination notify the Administrator of its acceptance in writing accompanied by a properly executed document of release. Upon receipt of such notice and document of release, the Administrator will forward the claim, a copy of the Administrator's final determination, and the claimant's document of release to the Secretary of the Treasury for payment of the claim in the amount of final authorization.
### §6517. Receipts from sale of used or surplus furniture and furnishings of Senate

On and after October 1, 1982, receipts from the sale of used or surplus furniture and furnishings shall be deposited in the United States Treasury for credit to the appropriation for "Senate Office Buildings" under the heading "Architect of the Capitol."

(Pub. L. 97–276, §101(e), Oct. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 1189.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 117b–1 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section, and to section 170a of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

Section is based on title I (2d proviso under "Senate Office Buildings") of S. 2939, as reported Sept. 22, 1982, which was enacted into law by Pub. L. 97–276.
Motion Granted; Abatement Order filed March 31 , 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00767

- CR

____________ CURTIS ELL WHITE , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 183rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1372505



### ABATEMENT ORDER

The State filed a motion in which it notified this court that an exhibit volume of the reporter’s record ha s been lost or destroyed. Rule 34.6(f) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that an appellant is entitled to a new trial when the reporter ’ s record or exhibits are lost, under certain circumstances. The State asks this court to abate the appea l for the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine
whether the exhibits can be replaced by agreement of the parties, or with a copydetermined by the trial court to accurately duplicate with reasonable certainty the

original exhibit s

. Tex. R. App. P. 34.6(f). The motion is granted.
Accordingly, the trial court is directed to conduct a hearing to determine the following: (1) whether appellant timely requested a reporter’s record; (2) whether without the appellant’s fault, significant exhibits have been lost or destroyed; (3) whether the lost exhibits are necessary to appellant ’ s appeal; and (4) whether the parties can agree on replacement of the missing exhibits with copies, or (5) if the trial court can determine that copies accurately duplicate the mis sing exhibits with reasonable certainty. The court is directed to reduce its findings to writing and to have a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed with the clerk of this court, together with a reporter’s record from the hearing, wit hin 30 days of the
date of this order

. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’ s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommenda tions are filed i n this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date f rom the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this court ’ s order. If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.

PER CURIAM
### §437. Time for making reports

(a) Each labor organization shall file the initial report required under section 431(a) of this title within ninety days after the date on which it first becomes subject to this chapter.

(b) Each person required to file a report under section 431(b), 432, 433(a), the second sentence of 433(b), or section 441 of this title shall file such report within ninety days after the end of each of its fiscal years; except that where such person is subject to section 431(b), 432, 433(a), the second sentence of 433(b), or section 441 of this title, as the case may be, for only a portion of such a fiscal year (because September 14, 1959, occurs during such person's fiscal year) such person becomes subject to this chapter during its fiscal year or such person may consider that portion as the entire fiscal year in making such report.

(Pub. L. 86–257, title II, §207, Sept. 14, 1959, 73 Stat. 529; Pub. L. 89–216, §2(d), Sept. 29, 1965, 79 Stat. 888.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1965—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 89–216 inserted reference to section 441 of this title in two places.
### **CHAPTER 30—NATIONAL CRITICAL MATERIALS COUNCIL**
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-35 April 4, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC TO MEET WITH PUBLIC ON NINE MILE POINT CORE SHROUD INSPECTION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with the

public on Monday, April 14, to discuss the results of NRC's

evaluation of the Nine Mile Point Unit 1 core shroud inspection.

Following a brief presentation, the staff will respond to

questions and comments from the public.

The meeting will begin at 7:00 p.m. in the Town of Scriba

Municipal Building at 42 Creamery Road.

#
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 820 

To provide an exemption from certain requirements for federally funded 

projects and activities in areas not in metropolitan statistical areas, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 18, 2021 

Mrs. BLACKBURN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To provide an exemption from certain requirements for federally funded projects and activities in areas not in metropolitan statistical areas, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FEDERALLY FUNDED PROJECTS AND ACTIVI4 TIES NOT IN METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL 

5 AREAS. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Na7 tional Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 

8 et seq.), the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 

9 1531 et seq.), and division A of subtitle III of title 54, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 820 IS

1 United States Code (formerly known as the ‘‘National 

2 Historic Preservation Act’’), shall not apply to any project 

3 or activity that— 

4 (1) is not located in a metropolitan statistical 

5 area (as defined by the Office of Management and 

6 Budget); and 

7 (2) is carried out using Federal funds. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
# Cemeteries & Memorials Map

## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Cemeteries & Memorials 
-                   Cemeteries & Memorials Map              

                            - Americas  PacificEurope
- Africa
WarWorld War IWorld War IIKorean WarVietnam WarOther
Footer menu-  Cemeteries & Memorials 
-  Virtual 360s 
-  Burial Search 
-  Education 
-  About Us 
-  News 
-  Flowers 
- Facebook
- Twitter
- YouTube
- Instagram

**ABMC Headquarters**2300 Clarendon Blvd, Suite 500Arlington, VA 22201Phone: 703-584-1501

ABMC honors the services of overseas U.S. armed forces by maintaining and promoting America's overseas commemorative cemeteries and memorials.
Footer Tertiary-  WWII Memorial Registry 
-  Korean War Veterans Memorial Honor Roll 
Footer Secondary-  Accessibility 
-  FOIA 
-  Budget and Performance 
-  Film Permits & Copyright Information 
-  Privacy Policy 
-  Vulnerability 
-  No FEAR Act 
-  USA.gov 
- Facebook
- Twitter
- YouTube
- Instagram

**ABMC Headquarters**2300 Clarendon Blvd, Suite 500Arlington, VA 22201Phone: 703-584-1501
Back to Top
### §353. Sale of lands unaffected; reservation of mineral rights; sale subject to prior lease; naval petroleum reserves unaffected

Nothing herein contained shall be deemed or construed to (a) amend, modify, or change any existing law authorizing or requiring the sale of acquired lands, or (b) empower any commission, bureau, or agency of the Government to make a reservation of the minerals in the sale of any acquired land: Provided, That any such sale or conveyance of lands shall be made by the agency having jurisdiction thereof, subject to any lease theretofore made, covering the mineral deposits underlying such lands: Provided further, That nothing in this chapter is intended, or shall be construed to affect in any manner any provision of chapter 869 of title 10.

(Aug. 7, 1947, ch. 513, §4, 61 Stat. 914; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §809(i)(2), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1843.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 substituted "chapter 869 of title 10" for "the Act of June 30, 1938 (32 Stat. 1252), amending the Act of June 4, 1920 (41 Stat. 813)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
### January 15, 2010

Dear Owner/Resident:

A Lead Based Paint (LBP) assessment was recently performed on your property by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as part of the Omaha Lead Superfund Site investigation. The purpose of this assessment is to determine whether a significant quantity of lead based paint is present on the exterior surface of structures, where deteriorating paint conditions (peeling, flaking, cracking, etc.) exist that might increase lead concentrations in the yard above acceptable levels.
As requested, enclosed are the LBP assessment sheets for 3809 MASON ST along with a LBP Fact Sheet. The EPA is currently developing paint stabilization eligibility criteria and at this time can not identify which homes will ultimately be eligible for EPA-funded paint stabilization. At present, paint stabilization is being offered at only those households with the most severe LPB problems, particularly where children under the age of 7 reside. The EPA stresses the importance of maintaining painted surfaces where any amount of LBP is present. The LBP Fact Sheet provides information pertaining to the EPA’s Exterior LBP Response Program. Once the eligibility criterion is finalized (and if your property qualifies) a representative from EPA or the Omaha Lead Hazard Control Program (LHCP) will contact you to arrange for paint stabilization at your property.
Exposure to lead contamination can adversely affect the development and behavior of young children. If you have children less than seven years of age living in your home, we strongly recommend that you contact your doctor or the Douglas County Health Department at (402) 444-7825 and arrange to have their blood tested. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the EPA Public Information Center at (402) 731-3045.

Sincerely,

Steve M Langum

Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp. 6601 College Blvd. Overland Park, KS 66211 USA Telephone: 913-458-2900Omaha Lead Site LBP Assessment

Sample Number Lead Loading StructuretFeature Substrate Color Deteriorated (Window, siding, porch, etc.) (Wood, concrete, etc.) Area

H


### --- P


### - 12


### - 21356 ftz



### -- 

# 5- P 21356 

# A .Sd,,lsid A c L P



### -- - -P--21356 rng/cm' ft'Arrow Address: 3809 MASON ST Omaha Lead Site NOF~~

.- 

# k Site Sketch 

# I
LBP Assessment ALT: Phone: H: 

# I I l l

I I C 1 Plan View 

# - lndicate number of stories and perimeter dimensions of structure Indicate reaions of deterioration and describe (Deterioratton could include surfaces that are worn due to friction. checking. cracking and flaking, allgatoring, blistering andlor peeiing)