alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-057 September 20, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC ISSUES FINDING OF SUBSTANTIAL IMPORTANCE TO SAFETY

TO CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has determined that a violation of NRC regulations at

Calvert Cliffs Unit 1 nuclear power plant should be characterized as ìyellow,î meaning it is an issue of

substantial importance to safety that will result in additional NRC inspection. The plant, located in

Lusby, Md., is operated by Constellation Nuclear.

An NRC inspection was conducted in June and July of this year to look into the failure of an

auxiliary feedwater pump during a test on May 16. The auxiliary feedwater system is a backup system

that provides water to the plantís steam generators in the event that the main feedwater system is lost. 

The inspectors found that workers failed to adhere to maintenance instructions during maintenance on

the pump and applied too much sealant to the bearing housing, contaminating the bearing oil, resulting

in the bearing failure.

Under the NRC's new reactor oversight process, inspection findings are evaluated under a

significance determination process and assigned a color that indicates safety significance. Findings

with very low safety significance are labeled "green." "White" findings have low to moderate

importance to safety and may require additional NRC inspection. "Yellow" findings have substantial

safety significance, and "red" findings high safety significance. 

A preliminary ìyellowî finding was described in an inspection report dated August 24 of this

year. The letter transmitting the report provided the company with an opportunity to either request a

regulatory conference to discuss this issue or to respond in writing. The company declined the

conference and did not contest the characterization of the risk significance of this finding.

The company has taken corrective action to correct the problem and the pump was tested

satisfactorily. The company is required to respond in writing within 30 days, detailing its immediate

and long-term corrective actions. A supplemental NRC inspection will be scheduled to follow-up on

Constellationís corrective actions. 

###
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-11007

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ABEL RIOS, also known as Abel Garza, also known as DDD,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:13-CR-384-4

Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Abel Rios has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Rios has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and 

the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 18, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-11007 Document: 00513158498 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2015
No. 14-11007

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-11007 Document: 00513158498 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2015
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov 

No. III-02-004 March 14, 2002

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov 

NRC TO MEET WITH NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT CO. MARCH 18 TO DISCUSS 

DUANE ARNOLD ENERGY CENTER PERFORMANCE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Nuclear

Management Company in Palo, Iowa, on Monday, March 18, to discuss the results of the agency's

annual assessment of safety performance at the Duane Arnold Energy Center. The facility is located in

Palo.

The meeting, which will be the open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 2

p.m. in the Palo Community Center, 1006 First Street, Palo. Before the meeting is concluded, NRC

officials will answer any questions from members of the public.

The performance period to be discussed is April 1 through December 31 of last year.

A letter sent from the NRC Region III office to Nuclear Management Company addresses plant

performance during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on

the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/duan_2001q4.pdf

Current performance information for Clinton is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/DUAN/duan_chart.html

# # #
#### § 147.33 Reimbursement by fair operator.

All actual and necessary charges for labor, services, and other expenses in connection with the entry, examination, appraisement, custody, abandonment, destruction, or release of articles entered under the regulations of this part, together with the necessary charges for salaries of Customs officers and employees in connection with the accounting for, custody of, and supervision over, such articles, shall be reimbursed by the fair operator to the Government, payment to be made to CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically, on the port director's or Center director's demand made before January 19, 2017 or on the Center director's demand made on or after January 19, 2017, for deposit to the appropriation from which paid.

[CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93021, Dec. 20, 2016]
#### Rebecca Bauman, Respondent, v. Joseph Engelman and Others, Appellants. Joseph H. Bauman, Respondent, v. Joseph Engelman and Others, Appellants.

Orders reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motions granted, with ten dollars costs, on *Sylvester*v. *Lewis*(55 App. Div. 470). Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-02-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          12,224
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,824
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,225
<INVENTORY>                                    115,335
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               268,285
<PP&E>                                         522,603
<DEPRECIATION>                               (227,304)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 657,187
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          220,772
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           136
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,133
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   657,187
<SALES>                                        207,674
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               207,674
<CGS>                                          178,211
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  178,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,057
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   191
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,001
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,128
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,491
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,637
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,637
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

d0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

137573 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137573 

 COA: 287159 

St. Clair CC: 07-002327-FH 

ROBERT LEE FREEMAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 By order of February 24, 2009, the application for leave to appeal the September 

29, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

People v Idziak (Docket No. 137301). On order of the Court, the case having been 

decided on July 31, 2009, 484 Mich 549 (2009), the application is again considered, and 

it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be 

reviewed by this Court. 

 KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her opinion in 

People v Idziak, 484 Mich 549 (2009). 

 CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal to reconsider People v Idziak, 484 

Mich 549 (2009).
§ 206.24 Contents of request. The request for an investigation shall include the following information: ( a ) The identity of the entity submitting the request; a description of the relief action the effectiveness of which is allegedly being undermined; and a description of the imported article, identifying the United States tariff provision under which it is classified, and the name of the country or countries from which the surge in imports is alleged to be coming;
( b ) The information required in § 206.14(b) of this subpart concerning representativeness of the entity filing the request;
( c ) Data concerning imports from the USMCA country or countries that form the basis of requestor's claim that a surge in imports has occurred;
( d ) Information supporting the claim that such surge in imports undermines the effectiveness of the relief action.
[59 FR 5091, Feb. 3, 1994, as amended at 88 FR 14890, Mar. 10, 2023]
### §1362. Notices

#### (a) In general

Every employing office shall post and keep posted (in conspicuous places upon its premises where notices to covered employees are customarily posted) a notice provided by the Office that—

(1) describes the rights, protections, and procedures applicable to covered employees of the employing office under this chapter, concerning violations described in subsection (b); and

(2) includes contact information for the Office.

#### (b) Violations

A violation described in this subsection is—

(1) discrimination prohibited by section 1311(a) of this title (including, in accordance with section 1302(c) of this title, discrimination prohibited by title II of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (42 U.S.C. 2000ff et seq.)) or 1316(a) of this title; and

(2) a violation of section 1317 of this title that is related to discrimination described in paragraph (1).

(Pub. L. 104–1, title II, §226, as added Pub. L. 115–397, title III, §304(a), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5322.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 104–1, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 3, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1301 of this title and Tables.

The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is Pub. L. 110–233, May 21, 2008, 122 Stat. 881. Title II of the Act is classified generally to chapter 21F (§2000ff et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2000ff of Title 42 and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon expiration of the 180-day period beginning on Dec. 21, 2018, with provisions for effect on pending proceedings, see section 401 of Pub. L. 115–397, set out as an Effective Date of 2018 Amendment note under section 1301 of this title.
nFRARTMENTOF 

MANSPORWIO N 

:0KLT OPERATIONS 

M mb 2U P 3'- 51 SERVED AUGUST 24, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MILAN INSTITUTE OF COSMETOLOGY 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10SO0009 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS NO. FAA-2010-0629 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2010SO700101) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

innie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative La 

Attachment - Service List 
i • FAA Docket No. CP10SO0009 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Stephen T. Chema, II, Esq. 

Peter S. Leyton, Esq. 

Ritzert & Leyton, PC, Respondent's Counsel 

11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 400 

Fairfax, VA 22030 

TEL: 703-934-2660 

FAX: 703-934-9840 

Gary Yasuda 

Milan Institute of Beauty 

1720 W. Walnut Avenue 

Visalia, CA 93277 

Andrea Michelle Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building - Room 

2014, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### § 123.32 In-bond application.

An in-bond application must be submitted pursuant to part 18 of this chapter upon arrival of merchandise which is to proceed under the provisions of this subpart.

[CBP Dec. 17-13, 82 FR 45405, Sept. 28, 2017]
| | Exhibit 32.1
| | ------------

Certification
of Chief Executive Officerof Prime Medical Services, Inc.

|This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form
10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 of Prime Medical Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Issuer).
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Brad A. Hummel, the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:  November 5, 2004

| | /s/ Brad A. Hummel

Brad A. Hummel
President and Chief Executive Officer
Prime Medical Services, Inc.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 01, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 01, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17I0126. GWINNETT COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al. v. AUBREY TURNER.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

15C04815
#### §§ 133.43-133.45 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 152

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 152 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93022, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 152.17 Changes in classification by Congress or by Presidential Proclamation.

When a rate of Customs duty or internal revenue tax imposed upon or by reason of importation is changed by an act of Congress or by a proclamation of the President, the new rate shall be applied in accordance with the detailed instructions in § 141.69 of this chapter, which provides in general that the rates of duty applicable to merchandise shall be those in effect on the date of entry or withdrawal for consumption, except for certain merchandise covered by an entry for immediate transportation or overcarried and returned to the port of entry.
Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 199 / Friday, October 15, 2004 / Notices 61223

[FR Doc. 04–23119 Filed 10–14–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary 

Renewal of the Planning and Steering 

Advisory Committee (Navy)

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Planning and Steering 

Advisory Committee (PSAC) has been 

renewed in consonance with the public 

interest, and in accordance with the 

provisions of Public Law 92–463, the 

‘‘Federal Advisory Committee Act.’’

The PSAC provides an avenue of 

communications by which a 

distinguished group representing 

scientific, academic engineering and 

intelligence communities advises the 

Chief of Naval Operations on questions 

related to SSBN Security. Their mission 

is to make in-depth technical 

assessments of U.S. and foreign threat 

ASW developments and related 

technologies, to critically review 

programs which potentially impact 

SSBN survivability, and to evaluate 

intelligence efforts to identify and 

define ASW and SSBN survivability 

threats. 

The Committee will continue to be 

composed of selected Group members to 

conduct detailed examinations of 

matters related to SSBN security.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Laura Wurzer, telephone: 301–693–

0934.

Dated: October 8, 2004. 

L.M. Bynum, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 04–23114 Filed 10–14–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary 

National Security Education Board 

Meeting

AGENCY: National Defense University, 

DOD.


EN15OC04.009</GPH>
### §6540. Adjustment of rate of compensation by Secretary of Senate

Any specific rate of compensation established by law, as such rate has been increased or may hereafter be increased by or pursuant to law, for any position under the jurisdiction of the Secretary shall be considered as the maximum rate of compensation for that position, and the Secretary is authorized to adjust the rate of compensation of an individual occupying any such position to a rate not exceeding such maximum rate.

(Pub. L. 91–382, Aug. 18, 1970, 84 Stat. 808.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 61c–1 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Increases in Compensation

Increases in compensation for Senate officers and employees under authority of Federal Pay Comparability Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 91–656), see section 4571 of this title, and Salary Directives of President pro tempore of the Senate, set out as notes under that section.