alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 21.1

                 SUBSIDIARIES OF FEDERAL DATA CORPORATION


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                            State of                          Doing
Subsidiaries             Incorporation                   Business Name
------------             -------------                   -------------
<S>                      <C>                         <C>
FDCT Corp.                  Delaware                 FDCT Corp.

FDC Technologies, Inc.      Delaware                 FDC Technologies, Inc.

NYMA, Inc.                  Maryland                 NYMA, Inc.

Sylvest Management          Maryland                 Sylvest Management
  Systems Corporation                                  Systems Corporation

R.O.W. Sciences, Inc.       Delaware                 R.O.W. Sciences, Inc.

Technical and Management    New Jersey               Technical and Management
  Assistance, Inc.                                     Assistance, Inc.
</TABLE>
### §1723. Rewards

Where amounts representing royalty or other payments owed to the United States with respect to any oil and gas lease on Federal lands or the Outer Continental Shelf are recovered pursuant to any action taken by the Secretary under this chapter as a result of information provided to the Secretary by any person, the Secretary is authorized to pay to such person an amount equal to not more than 10 percent of such recovered amounts. The preceding sentence shall not apply to information provided by an officer or employee of the United States, an officer or employee of a State or Indian tribe acting pursuant to a cooperative agreement or delegation under this chapter, or any person acting pursuant to a contract authorized by this chapter.

(Pub. L. 97–451, title I, §113, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2456.)
### §388. Subpena for attendance at deposition

#### (a) Issuance

Upon application of any party, a subpena for attendance at a deposition shall be issued by:

(1) a judge or clerk of the United States district court for the district in which the place of examination is located;

(2) a judge or clerk of any court of record of the State in which the place of examination is located; or

(3) a judge or clerk of any court of record of the county in which the place of examination is located.

#### (b) Time, method, and proof of service

Service of the subpena shall be made upon the witness no later than three days before the day on which his attendance is directed. A subpena may be served by any person who is not a party to the contested election case and is not less than eighteen years of age. Service of a subpena upon a person named therein shall be made by delivering a copy thereof to such person and by tendering to him the fee for one day's attendance and the mileage allowed by section 389 of this title. Written proof of service shall be made under oath by the person making same and shall be filed with the Clerk.

#### (c) Place of examination

A witness may be required to attend an examination only in the county wherein he resides or is employed, or transacts his business in person, or is served with a subpena, or within forty miles of the place of service.

#### (d) Form

Every subpena shall state the name and title of the officer issuing same and the title of the contested election case, and shall command each person to whom it is directed to attend and give testimony at a time and place and before an officer specified therein.

#### (e) Production of documents

A subpena may also command the person to whom it is directed to produce the books, papers, documents, or other tangible things designated therein, but the committee, upon motion promptly made and in any event at or before the time specified in the subpena for compliance therewith, may (1) quash or modify the subpena if it is unreasonable or oppressive, or (2) condition denial of the motion upon the advancement by the party in whose behalf the subpena is issued of the reasonable cost of producing the books, papers, documents, or tangible things. In the case of public records or documents, copies thereof, certified by the person having official custody thereof, may be produced in lieu of the originals.

(Pub. L. 91–138, §9, Dec. 5, 1969, 83 Stat. 288.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to any general or special election for Representative in, or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress of the United States occurring after Dec. 5, 1969, see section 19 of Pub. L. 91–138, set out as a note under section 381 of this title.
#### John O. Godbout, as General Guardian of Betty C. Irwin, an Infant, and as Administrator of the Estate of John N. Irwin, Deceased, Respondent, v. Annie L. Irwin, Defendant, and Arthur F. Geele, Jr., et al., Appellants.

Order, upon reargument, denying appellants’ motion to vacate, annul and set aside a warrant of attachment, the levy based thereon, the order permitting service of the summons herein by publication, and the service of the summons predicated thereon, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to appellants, if so advised, to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Third persons claiming an interest in the *1030property attached may avail themselves of the provisions of section 924 of the Civil Practice Act, hut appellants themselves may not assert the title of those third persons as a basis for vacating the attachment. Appeal from the original order, dated March 9, 1948, dismissed, without costs. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Nolan, Sneed and Wenzel, 'JJ., concur. [See 274 App. Div. 801.]
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The certification set forth below is being submittedin connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year endedDecember 31, 2006 (the “Annual Report”) for the purposes of complying withRule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Rafael MirandaRobredo, the Chief Executive Officer and José Luis Palomo Álvarez, the ChiefFinancial Officer of Endesa, S.A., each certifies that, to the best of hisknowledge:

1.                the Annual Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Endesa, S.A.
| Date: June 1, 2007 |   |                                   |
|------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                         | By:    | /s/ RAFAEL MIRANDA ROBREDO             |
|                         |   | Name:                                  | Rafael Miranda Robredo |
|                         |   | Title:                                 | *Chief Executive Officer* |
|                         |   | /s/ JOSÉ LUIS PALOMO ÁLVAREZ |
|                         |   | Name:                                  | José Luis Palomo Álvarez |
|                         |   | Title:                                 | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
Conference Call with EPA and Airlines for America

October 16, 2012

Attendees:

EPA OUST: 

Liz McDermott, Linda Gerber, Tim Smith, Tim Roberts, Erin Knighton, Cho Yi Kwan, Tim 

Smith

Airlines for America:

Nancy Young

Tim Pohle

Airports Council International-North America:

Katherine Preston

On this conference call EPA and the Airlines for America discussed comments on the proposed 

changes to the UST regulations. The discussion focused on the proposed changes to previously 

deferred airport hydrant systems and the universe of commercial airports that would fall under 

the proposed regulations and the additional information EPA is collecting on these airports.
#### § 191.167 Liquidation.

No deduction of 1 percent of the internal revenue taxes paid or determined shall be made in allowing entries under § 5062(c), Internal Revenue Code, as amended (26 U.S.C. 5062(c)).
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-02-0133 - Control of Solid Materials.  Options and Recommendations for Proceeding

Accession Number: ML021480395

Date Released: Friday, October 25, 2002

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML021480494 - SECY-02-0133 - Control of Solid Materials: Options and Recommendations for Proceeding (13 page(s), 7/15/2002)
    - ML021490002 - SECY-02-0133-Attachment 1- Outline Summary of the National Academies Study on Alternatives for Control of Slightly Contaminated Solid Material (13 page(s), 7/15/2002)
    - ML021490003 - SECY-02-0133-Attachment 2-Outline Summary of the National Academies Study on Alternatives for Control of Slightly Contaminated Solid Material (32 page(s), 7/15/2002)
    - ML021490008 - SECY-02-0133-Attachment 3-Status of Technical Basis Development (8 page(s), 7/15/2002)
    - ML021490013 - SECY-02-0133-Attachment 4-Review of International and  Domestic Activities Related to Decision-making on Control of Solid Materials (17 page(s), 7/15/2002)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### § 6.10 Assistance and referrals.

Requests for assistance and referral to the responsible system manager or other FEMA employee charged with implementing these regulations should be made to the Privacy Appeals Officer, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472.

[45 FR 17152, Mar. 18, 1980]
Exhibit 4.2

                                    ADDENDUM
 To the Talent Agreement between Gina Mouery and Raven Moon Entertainment, Inc.
            (Formerly Raven Moon International) dated January 3, 2001

Paragraph 2(i) shall be changed as follows:

A minimum monthly advance of $2,000 plus Five Percent (5%) of any and all Gross
Revenues specifically from "Gina D's Kids Club" Videos Vol. 1, Vol. 2 & Vol. 3,
3 Episode DVD, "Sing Along With Gina" Video & DVD, "Gina D's Kids Club" Music
CD's Vol. 1 & 2, "Young America" CD, the "Cuddle Bug" toy or any of the
Hacker-Rumsey projects as defined in the Agreement signed between Hacker-Rumsey
and Raven Moon Entertainment, Inc. in January 2002, and received by Raven Moon
Home Video Products, LLC or Raven Moon Entertainment, Inc. from any source/any
media throughout the world from any and all program sales, merchandising sales,
licensing fees and advances received by Raven Moon Home Video Products, LLC,
Raven Moon Television Productions and video Distribution, LLC and Raven Moon
Entertainment, Inc. during the term of this Agreement or options to this
Agreement. All Gross Revenue payments shall be made to Gina Mouery or her
assigns no later than thirty (30) days after the Company receives them.

Paragraph 2(ii) shall be changed as follows:

RMOO shall grant Gina Mouery 45,000,000 S-8 options to purchase up to 45,000,000
S-8 shares of RMOO common stock anytime between January 1, 2003 and December 31,
2003 at a 50% discount of the 10 day average bid price. These shares shall be
for services to be rendered for promotional appearances for a period of one year
beginning January 1, 2003, at Conventions, Bookstore tours and Children's Fairs.
In addition RMOO shall pay for any and all travel expenses and per diem for her
and related personnel needed to accompany her at her discretion for the
promotion of all products listed in paragraph 2 above. In addition RMOO shall
have the right to use the registered name "Gina D" for a ten-year period
beginning on January 3, 2001.

Paragraph 2(iv) shall be changed as follows:

Either a reimbursement or direct payment of up to $962 per month for a lease car
and either reimbursement of direct payment for Car Insurance and Health
Insurance coverage during the term of this Agreement.

DATE : January 18, 2003

                            ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO :



/s/  Gina Mouery
---------------------------------------
     Gina Mouery a.k.a. Gina D.



Raven Moon International, Inc.


By:  /s/  Joey DiFrancesco
   ------------------------------------
          Joey DiFrancesco, President
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1425 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1425

 To provide for the expedited and increased assignment of spectrum for 
                        public safety purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2003

 Ms. Harman (for herself, Mr. Weldon of Pennsylvania, Mr. Israel, Mr. 
Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. Frelinghuysen, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Skelton, 
 Mr. King of New York, Mr. Bereuter, Ms. Millender-McDonald, Mr. Smith 
   of Washington, Mrs. Tauscher, Mr. McGovern, Mrs. Christensen, Mr. 
Etheridge, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. George Miller of California, Mrs. Davis of 
California, Mr. McHugh, Mr. Davis of Tennessee, Mr. Berman, Mr. Shays, 
  Mr. Ford, and Mrs. Lowey) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the expedited and increased assignment of spectrum for 
                        public safety purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Homeland Emergency Response 
Operations Act'' or the ``HERO Act''.

SEC. 2. PREVENTION OF DELAY IN REASSIGNMENT OF 24 MEGAHERTZ FOR PUBLIC 
              SAFETY PURPOSES.

     Section 309(j)(14) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 
309(j)(14)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(D) Extensions not permitted for channels (63, 
                64, 68 and 69) reassigned for public safety services.--
                Notwithstanding subparagraph (B), the Commission shall 
                not grant any extension under such subparagraph from 
                the limitation of subparagraph (A) with respect to the 
                frequencies assigned, pursuant to section 337(a)(1), 
                for public safety services. The Commission shall take 
                all actions necessary to complete assignment of the 
                electromagnetic spectrum between 764 and 776 megahertz, 
                inclusive, and between 794 and 806 megahertz, 
                inclusive, for public safety services and to permit 
                operations by public safety services on those 
                frequencies commencing no later than January 1, 
                2007.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 148.55 Exemption for articles embodying American trademark or copyright. ( a ) *Application of exemption.* An exemption is provided for articles bearing a counterfeit mark (as defined in § 133.21(a) of this chapter) or piratical articles (as defined in § 133.42(a) of this chapter) accompanying any person arriving in the United States which would be prohibited entry under 19 U.S.C. 1526, 15 U.S.C. 1124, or 17 U.S.C. 602. The exemption may be applied either to those piratical articles or to those articles bearing a counterfeit mark that are of foreign manufacture and bear a recorded mark owned by a citizen of, or a corporation or association created or organized within, the United States, when imported for the arriving person's personal use in the quantities provided in paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) *Limitations* — ( 1 ) *30-day period.* The exemption in paragraph (a) of this section shall not be granted to any person who has taken advantage of the exemption for the same type of article within the 30-day period immediately prior to his arrival in the United States. The date of the person's last arrival on which he claimed this exemption shall be considered to be the date he last took advantage of the exemption.
( 2 ) *Sale of exempted articles.* If an article which has been exempted is sold within one year of the date of importation, the article or its value (to be recovered from the importer), is subject to forfeiture. A sale subject to judicial order or in the liquidation of an estate is not subject to the provisions of this paragraph.
( c ) *Quantities.* Generally, every 30 days, persons arriving in the United States may apply the exemption to the following: one piratical article of each type, or one article of each type bearing a counterfeit mark, and/or one piratical article of each type that is also an article bearing a counterfeit mark. The Commissioner shall determine if more than one article may be entered and, with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury, publish in the Federal Register a list of types of articles and the quantities of each entitled to the exemption. If the owner of a recorded mark or recorded copyright allows importation of more than one article normally prohibited entry under 19 U.S.C. 1526, 15 U.S.C. 1124, or 17 U.S.C. 602, the total of those articles authorized by the owner may be entered without penalty.
[T.D. 79-159, 44 FR 31969, June 4, 1979; 44 FR 35208, June 19, 1979, as amended by T.D. 91-77, 56 FR 46115, Sept. 10, 1991; 89 FR 52379, June 24, 2024]
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-41017

JAMES J. NUNEZ

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

CITY OF TEXAS CITY, TEXAS

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:08-CV-80

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant James J. Nunez, a firefighter for Defendant-Appellee

City of Texas City, Texas before he was fired by the Fire Chief effective October

15, 2001, appeals the district court’s Final Judgment of September 3, 2009,

granting summary judgment of dismissal with prejudice of Nunez’s claim that

his firing was grounded in racial discrimination. Having reviewed the record on

appeal in light of the applicable law presented by the parties in their appellate

briefs as applied to the relevant facts, we conclude that the district court

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 4, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 09-41017 Document: 00511099586 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/04/2010
No. 09-41017

2

properly granted the City’s motion for summary judgment, dismissing Nunez’s

action, for the reasons exhaustively and correctly set forth in that court’s

Memorandum and Order signed on September 3, 2009.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 09-41017 Document: 00511099586 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/04/2010
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1405 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1405

      To disqualify certain persons from receiving Federal funds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 20, 2003

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To disqualify certain persons from receiving Federal funds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Truth in Financing Act''.

SEC. 2. DISQUALIFICATION FOR FEDERAL FUNDING.

     Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any recipient of 
Federal funds shall be disqualified for Federal funding of any type if, 
at a time when the recipient is receiving Federal funds for any of the 
recipient's activities, the recipient is found by any Federal agency or 
Federal or State court to have--
            (1) made a false statement on an application for Federal 
        funds;
            (2) violated any Federal law or regulation or State or 
        local law punishable by imprisonment for at least 6 months or a 
        fine of at least $5,000; and
            (3) aided or abetted the violation of any law or regulation 
        described in paragraph (2).

SEC. 3. CAUSE OF ACTION.

     Notwithstanding any other provision of law, or any judicial 
decision relating to issues of standing, any citizen of the United 
States may bring a private cause of action against any organization 
receiving Federal funds for violating the prohibition of section 2.
                                 <all>
```
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

CAPITAL MACHINE COMPANY, INC., AND

INDIANA FORGE, LLC,

Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants,

AND

WILLIAM L. KOSS,

Counterclaim Defendant,

v.

MILLER VENEERS, INC., THOMAS A. MILLER, 

BENJAMIN R. MILLER, SALLY M. SANDO, 

ROBERT D. BRAND, INDIANAPOLIS VENEER 

WORKS, LLC, EGENOLF MACHINE, INC., AND

MERRITT PLYWOOD MACHINERY, INC.,

Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellees.

______________________ 

2014-1171

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Indiana in No. 1:09-cv-00702-JMSDML, Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 
 

PAUL B. OVERHAUSER, Overhauser Law Offices, LLC, 

of Greenfield, Indiana, argued for plaintiffs/counterclaim 

defendants-appellants. 

MICHAEL A. SWIFT, Maginot, Moore & Beck, LLP, of 

Indianapolis, Indiana, argued for defendants/counterclaimants-appellees. Of counsel on the brief 

were J. LEE MCNEELY, CYNTHIA A. BEDRICK, and CHARLES 

B. DAUGHERTY, McNeely Stephenson Thopy & Harrold, of 

Shelbyville, Indiana. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, O’MALLEY, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 7, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
### §924a. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–275, §2(c)(2), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1926

Section, Pub. L. 95–239, §11, Mar. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 101, related to notification to miners of eligibility for medical services and supplies and the period for filing a claim.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 90 days after Nov. 2, 2002, see section 4 of Pub. L. 107–275, set out as an Effective Date of 2002 Amendment note under section 902 of this title.