alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.2





Ener1,
      Inc.


500
      West
      Cypress Creek Road-Suite 100


Ft.
      Lauderdale, Florida, 33309





May
      22,
      2006





Securities
      and Exchange Commission


100
      F
      Street, NE


Washington,
      DC 20549





Re:
      Certification Of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
      1350





Dear
      Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1,
      Inc.,
      for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission, I, Gerard Herlihy, Chief Financial Officer of Ener1, Inc., hereby
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
            such
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended
                March 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2)
            the
                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
                Ener1,
                Inc., for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                Ener1, Inc.








/s/
                Gerard HerlihyGerard
                Herlihy
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              (Duly
                Authorized Principal Financial and
              Accounting
                Officer and Duly Authorized
                Officer)











A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
      retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.





This
      certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to Ener1, Inc.’s
      quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
      to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
      reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
      except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
      filing.
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
Annual Report) for the purposes of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Rafael Miranda Robredo, the Chief Executive Officer and José Luis
Palomo Alvarez, the Chief Financial Officer of Endesa, S.A., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Endesa, S.A.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 30, 2005



By:

/S/    RAFAEL MIRANDA
ROBREDOName:

Rafael Miranda RobredoTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




By:

/S/    JOSÉ LUIS PALOMO
ALVAREZName:

José Luis Palomo AlvarezTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1506

For the relief of Laura Maldonado Caetani. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2003

Mr. ACEVEDO-VILA ́ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Laura Maldonado Caetani.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR LAURA 

4 MALDONADO CAETANI. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Laura Maldonado Caetani shall be eligible for 

8 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

9 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi10 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi11 grant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment 

12 of status to lawful permanent resident. 
2

•HR 1506 IH 

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Laura Maldonado 

2 Caetani enters the United States before the filing deadline 

3 specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have 

4 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi5 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 

6 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 

7 the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Laura Maldonado Caetani, the Secretary of 

16 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, dur17 ing the current or next following fiscal year, the total num18 ber of immigrant visas that are made available to natives 

19 of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) 

20 of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, 

21 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail22 able to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under 

23 section 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 
3

•HR 1506 IH 

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Laura Maldonado Caetani 

2 shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 

3 right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Na4 tionality Act.

Æ
### §6509. Vouchering Senate office charges

#### (a) Senate support office charges

Charges for expenses of any office, the funds of which are disbursed by the Secretary of the Senate, may be vouchered by a Senate support office paying such expenses or to which such charges are owed for goods or services provided, if—

(1) such charges are paid on behalf of the office incurring such expenses by such Senate support office; or

(2) such charges are payable to such Senate support office for goods or services provided by such office to the office incurring such expenses.

#### (b) Payment charged to official funds

Payments under this section shall be charged to the official funds of the office on whose behalf the expenses were paid, or which received the goods or services for which payment is required.

#### (c) Certification

Any voucher submitted by a Senate support office pursuant to this section shall be accompanied by a certification from such office of the amount and that such purchases were of the nature that they could be charged to the official funds of the office on whose behalf charges were paid, or to which goods or services were provided.

#### (d) Regulations

Vouchers under this section shall be submitted and paid subject to such regulations as may be promulgated by the Committee on Rules and Administration.

(Pub. L. 103–69, title I, §1, Aug. 11, 1993, 107 Stat. 695.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 68–8 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Congressional Operations Appropriations Act, 1994, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1994.
p.1 

OAR Box 1313 

Prepped by LaTeia Shed 

Document Number: 

4) l-A-3 

Docket Number: 

A-88-02 

Printed 6/12/2008 9:03:27 AM Sheet 4 of 99 
P.2 

A-88-02 

Information on health or risk assessment was removed from the 

docket. This information was compiled before the Clean Air 

Act Amendments (1990) but was not used in the development of 

the chromium NESHAP. 

tH JM( 1 8199 

i l 

EPA AIR DOCKET
Stephen M. Frank, PE

Senior Environmental Specialist

Office: 724-597-8310

Mobile: 724-249-3610

From: Jordan, Ronald

To: Thomas Finseth

Subject: FW: Keystone data

Date: Thursday, June 26, 2014 3:16:57 PM

Attachments: 4.10.12 Revised Report.pdf

From: Frank, Stephen [mailto:Stephen.Frank@nrgenergy.com]

Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 2:24 PM

To: Jordan, Ronald

Cc: Jacklin, Mark J; Flanders, Phillip; Schroeder, Cuc

Subject: RE: Keystone data

Ron,

Attached is the Revised Report for April 10, 2012 with our lab’s

explanation.

Also, the DF’s from the Lab Reports include the correct dilution factors.

There was a discrepancy between DF data that was downloaded by me

from our lab’s website and what was included in the Lab Reports. We are

working with the lab to resolve this issue.

With respect to the January 13, 2014 mercury sample, I am still trying to

confirm with the lab that the correct DF value is 500. I will follow up with

you upon receipt of confirmation from our lab.

I think that covers your questions, please let me know if I missed

anything.

Regards, Steve

From: Jordan, Ronald [mailto:Jordan.Ronald@epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 9:52 AM

To: Frank, Stephen

Cc: Jacklin, Mark J; Flanders, Phillip; Schroeder, Cuc

Subject: FW: Keystone data

Good morning Steve,
A quick follow-up to the email I sent you on the 17th.  Just wanted to make sure you received the

email.

Regards,

Ron

From: Jordan, Ronald

Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 9:53 AM

To: 'Frank, Stephen'

Cc: Jacklin, Mark J; Flanders, Phillip; Schroeder, Cuc; 'Thomas Finseth'; Dan-Tam Nguyen; Yan Zhuang

Subject: Keystone data

Good morning Steve,

I hope all is well with you.

We have just a few questions remaining about the data you provided. I hope (and you probably do

also!) that these are our final questions and won’t have to bother you about this again. Please see

the attached file – in one instance we’re trying to confirm the correct concentration value and for

the remainder we’re trying to resolve discrepancies between the lab reports and data spreadsheet

regarding dilution factors and reporting limits.

Please let me know if you need more clarification or would like to discuss.  Thanks for your help with

this and our previous discussions about the data.

Regards,

Ron

---------------------------------

Ron Jordan

USEPA Office of Water

Engineering & Analysis Division (4303T)

(202) 566-1003
#### § 200.735-117 Supplementary statements.

Changes in, or additions to, the information contained in an employee's statement of employment and financial interests shall be reported in a supplementary statement as of June 30 each year. If no changes or additions occur, a negative report is required. Notwithstanding the filing of the annual report under this section, each employee shall at all times avoid acquiring a financial interest that could result, or taking an action that would result, in a violation of the conflicts of interest provisions of section 208 of title 18, United States Code, or the regulations in this part.

[32 FR 16211, Nov. 28, 1967]
#### § 206.11 Applicability of subpart.

This subpart B applies specifically to investigations under section 202(b) of the Trade Act. For other applicable rules, see subpart A of this part and part 201 of this chapter.
#### William March et al., Copartners Doing Business as March & Mendl, Appellants, v. Sam Shimberg, Doing Business as Dana-Hall Coat Co., Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent, v. Lawson Purdy and Others, as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Appellants. (Omitted Property of 1912, and Assessment for 1913.)

Orders affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
# Treggon Owens

2236 Rutherford Road, Suite 115  Carlsbad
, CA 92008  Phone: 800

- 706

- 4662  E

- Mail: treggon@aerialmob.com Web: http://aerialmob.com

Date: August 17 , 2015

Administrator Docket Management Facility US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE West Building Ground Floor Room W12

- 140 Washington, DC 20590

Dear Administrator :

This letter is to submit new aircraft to our ‘ 333 Exemption ’ referenced above. Aerial MOB llc herby requests an Amendment to the Exemption to allow an additional type of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that fully complies with the condition s of the Exemption.

Aerial MOB llc wishes to operate the following new aircraft under our exemption: Freefly Alta, DJI Inspire, Aerial MOB Mini Racer, Aerial MOB Light Lifter Mark II, Aerial MOB Long Endurance, Aerial MOB Heavy Lifter Mark II

Attached h ereto, and submitted as a confidential document, is the Flight Operations and Procedures Manual (FOPM) for the additional UAS’s. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption.

As this is an amendment to a n existing exemption asking for only the addition of another type of unmanned aerial vehicle, Aerial MOB llc respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment. Ple ase contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this request for an amendment to the Exemption.

Sincerely,

Treggon Owens CEO

cc: Robert Pappas Jake Troutman Dean Griffith Thuy Cooper FAA Exemption # 11066

FAA Docket # FAA

- 2014

- 0353
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, B. K. Chin, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s latest fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.November 8, 2006                         /s/ B. K. Chin   B. K. Chin   Chief Executive Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132103 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

LANSING PAVILION, L.L.C., Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Justices SC: 132103 

v COA: 265970 

Ingham CC: 02-001734-CK

EASTWOOD, L.L.C., 

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/ThirdParty Plaintiff/Third-Party 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

LL & 127, L.L.C.,

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/ThirdParty Plaintiff-Appellee,

and 

J.R. ANDERSON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, 

and JEFFREY R. ANDERSON REAL ESTATE 

INC., 

Third-Party Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

STS CONSULTANTS, LTD., 

Third-Party Defendant/Third-Party 

Plaintiff,

and 

D.J. MCQUESTION & SONS, INC., 

Third-Party Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 8, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 28, 2006 

 Clerk
### §5344. Payments and reimbursements for certain House staff expenses

(a) Payments and reimbursements to staff persons under section 5343 of this title shall be made as provided (with respect to staff) in the regulations prescribed by the Committee on House Oversight with respect to travel and other expenses of staff. Reimbursements shall be paid on special voucher forms prescribed by the Committee on House Oversight.

(b) Additional funds, if any, for staff allowances and office space for use by Members-elect (other than an incumbent Member reelected to the ensuing Congress) shall be authorized by the Committee on House Oversight.

(Pub. L. 94–59, title II, §201, July 25, 1975, 89 Stat. 282; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §203(15), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1727.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 43b–3 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is based on section 2 of House Resolution No. 10, Ninety-fourth Congress, Jan. 14, 1975, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 94–59.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "House Oversight" for "House Administration" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on House Oversight of House of Representatives changed to Committee on House Administration of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Jan. 6, 1999.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-03-054 September 23, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

 Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC JUDGE DENIES REQUEST FOR STAY IN CASE 

OF BUCKS COUNTY, PA, IRRADIATOR

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission judge has issued an order denying a request to stay the

effectiveness of the NRC license recently awarded to CFC Logistics, Inc. The NRC staff issued

a license to the company in August for the operation of a commercial underwater irradiator at its

Milford Township (Bucks County), Pa., cold storage facility. 

A petition for a hearing on the CFC application was submitted to the NRC on June 23 by

a group of nearby residents, many of whom are members of the group Concerned Citizens of

Milford Township. The Chairman of the NRC’s independent Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

Panel designated a Presiding Officer, Judge Michael C. Farrar, to rule on the petition and to

preside over a hearing should the hearing request be granted. Subsequently, the petitioners filed

a request for a stay. Oral argument was held on the request for a hearing and the stay request on

September 10 in Allentown, Pa. Regarding the request for a hearing, the Judge has not yet issued

an opinion on the issues of the petitioner’s standing or the germaneness of the concerns they

raised. 

CFC Logistics stated in its application that the irradiator would be employed primarily for

the irradiation of food, cosmetics and pharmaceutical products. CFC also said it might be used to

irradiate a wide range of other materials.

Copies of the order may be obtained from the Region I Office of Public Affairs.

###
#### Irving Singer, Appellant, v. Crescent Commercial Corporation et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
#### Joseph Bolger, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. The Haas Tobacco Company, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs.
### SUBCHAPTER II—COAL LAND ENTRIES UNDER NONMINERAL LAND LAWS WITH RESERVATION OF COAL TO UNITED STATES