alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 201.160 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford a handicapped person an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the handicapped person.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf persons (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with § 201.160 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the agency head or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity, and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, handicapped persons receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
466 P.2d 871

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gilbert Salas MORALES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 9022.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

March 23, 1970.

Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 399, 81 N.M. 333, 466 P.2d 899 be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011- 4005

No. IV-03-010 March 21, 2003 

CONTACT: Victor Dricks E-mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128 

NRC TO MEET WITH WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORP.

 TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE OF WOLF CREEK

 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Wolf Creek Nuclear

Operating Corp. on Thursday April 3, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual assessment of safety

performance at the Wolf Creek Generating Station. The facility is located near Burlington, Kansas,

and is operated by WCNOC. 

 The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 6:00 

p.m. at the Coffey County Courthouse, 110 South 6th Street, Burlington.

Before the session is adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the

public on the safety performance of the plant, as well as the role of the NRC in ensuring safe plant

operation.

 The performance period to be discussed is January 1 to December 31, 2002. In addition, NRC

staff will provide an overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process works.

 A letter sent from the NRC Region IV Office to representatives of WCNOC addresses the

performance of the plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is

available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/wc_2002q4.pdf

“Overall, Wolf Creek Generating Station operated in a manner that preserved public health and

safety and fully met all cornerstone objectives,” the letter says, noting the NRC staff plans to conduct

only baseline inspections during 2003.

In addition, the letter notes: “As you are aware, since the terrorist attacks on September 11,

2001, the NRC has issued several Orders and threat advisories to enhance security capabilities and

improve guard force readiness. We have conducted inspections to review your implementation of

these requirements and have monitored your actions in response to changing threat advisories. For

calendar year 2003, we plan to continue these inspections and conduct portions of the security baseline

inspection program, as well as perform additional inspections to evaluate your compliance with new

requirements that may be ordered.”
Current performance information for Wolf Creek is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/WC/wc_chart.html

###
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the following Registration Statements of OMNI Energy Services Corp. on Forms S-8 (No. 333-126679, No. 333-110198, No. 333-49409, No. 333-80973 and No. 333-35816), pertaining to the incentive plans of OMNI EnergyServices Corp., of our report dated March 6, 2006, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10K of OMNI Energy Services Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/S/    PANNELL KERR FORSTEROFTEXAS, P.C. 

Houston, Texas 

March 31, 2006
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-91 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, June 16, 1998)

DR. DANA A. POWERS REAPPOINTED TO NRC’s ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON

REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

Dr. Dana A. Powers, the Vice-Chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory

Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS), has been

reappointed for a four-year term.

Dr. Powers, born in Ironton, Missouri, received his B.S. degree in Chemistry and

his Ph.D. degree in Chemistry, Chemical Engineering, and Economics from the

California Institute of Technology. He began his career in 1974 at Sandia National

Laboratory, where he currently serves as a senior scientist at the Nuclear Technology

Center. Dr. Powers is responsible for the development of safety research programs for

Department of Energy nuclear facilities. He has served on the Advisory Committee on

Nuclear Facility Safety for DOE and for DOE’s Chemical Reactions Tank Advisory

Panel.

Other members of the ACRS are:

Dr. Robert L. Seale, ACRS Chairman, Professor Emeritus of Nuclear and Energy

Engineering, Department of Nuclear and Energy Engineering, College of Engineering

and Mines, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

Dr. Thomas S. Kress, ACRS Member-At-Large, retired Head of Applied Systems

Technology Section, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Dr. George Apostolakis, ACRS Member, Professor, Nuclear Engineering Department,

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

John J. Barton, ACRS Member, retired Vice-President, GPU Nuclear Corporation,

Parsippany, NJ.

Dr. Mario H. Fontana, ACRS Member, Adjunct Professor, Nuclear Engineering
Department, University of Tennessee, and retired from Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Dr. Don W. Miller, ACRS Member, Professor and Chair, Nuclear Engineering,

Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Dr. William J. Shack, ACRS Member, Associate Director, Energy Technology Division,

Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL.

Dr. Robert E. Uhrig, ACRS Member, Distinguished Professor, Nuclear Engineering

Department, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, and Distinguished Scientist, I&C

Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.

Dr. Graham B. Wallis, ACRS Member, Professor, Thayer School of Engineering,

Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.

##
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10

===============================================================================
[LOGO OF BANK OF AMERICA]                                Amendment to Documents
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                  AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT

   This Amendment No.6 (the "Amendment") dated as of August 27, 1998, is between
BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION (the "Bank") and ST. JOHN
KNITS, INC. (the "Borrower").

                                   RECITALS
                                   --------

   A.  The Bank and the Borrower entered into a certain Business Loan Agreement
dated as of December 15, 1995, as previously amended (the "Agreement").

   B.  The Bank and the Borrower desire to further amend the Agreement.


                                   AGREEMENT
                                   ---------

    1.  DEFINITIONS.  Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment
        -----------
shall have the meaning given to them in the Agreement.

    2.  AMENDMENTS.  The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
        ----------

        2.1  In Paragraph 1.7(i) of the Agreement is amended to read in its
             entirety as follows:

             "(i) commercial letters of credit with a maximum maturity of 180
                  days but not to extend more than 60 days beyond the Expiration
                  Date.  Each commercial letter of credit will require drafts
                  payable at sight or up to 90 days after sight."

    3.  EFFECT OF AMENDMENT.  Except as provided in this Amendment, all of the
        -------------------
terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

        This Amendment is executed as of the date stated at the beginning of 
this Amendment.

BANK OF AMERICA
National Trust and Savings Association          St. John Knits, Inc.


X /s/ ARTHUR P. CARTER                          X /s/ ROGER G. RUPPERT 
--------------------------------------          ------------------------------
By:     Arthur P. Carter                        By:    Roger G. Ruppert
Title:  Vice President                          Title: Senior Vice President-
                                                       Finance and Chief
                                                       Financial Officer

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      -1-
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHeat Capacity Mapping Radiometer (HCMR) data processing algorithm, calibration, and flight performance evaluationThe rationale and procedures used in the radiometric calibration and correction of Heat Capacity Mapping Mission (HCMM) data are presented. Instrument-level testing and calibration of the Heat Capacity Mapping Radiometer (HCMR) were performed by the sensor contractor ITT Aerospace/Optical Division. The principal results are included. From the instrumental characteristics and calibration data obtained during ITT acceptance tests, an algorithm for post-launch processing was developed. Integrated spacecraft-level sensor calibration was performed at Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) approximately two months before launch. This calibration provided an opportunity to validate the data calibration algorithm. Instrumental parameters and results of the validation are presented and the performances of the instrument and the data system after launch are examined with respect to the radiometric results. Anomalies and their consequences are discussed. Flight data indicates a loss in sensor sensitivity with time. The loss was shown to be recoverable by an outgassing procedure performed approximately 65 days after the infrared channel was turned on. It is planned to repeat this procedure periodically.Document ID19840019180Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBohse, J. R.*(Computer Sciences Corp. Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Bewtra, M.*(Computer Sciences Corp.)*Barnes, W. L.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1979Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:80258NASA-TM-80258E84-10153Accession Number84N27248Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840019180.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
333-78295, No. 333-48154, No. 333-48156, No. 333-65130, No. 333-83818 and No.
333-99385 of BUCA, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report dated January
29, 2003, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BUCA, Inc. and
Subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2002.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 25, 2003
#### Morris Melafsky, Appellant, v. New York City Omnibus Corporation, Respondent.

Ho opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-46 June 27, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING NEAR LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT

ON CHANGES IN REACTOR OVERSIGHT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a public meeting for Thursday, July 6, in

Limerick, Pa., to discuss the agency’s new reactor oversight process. The process was initiated in

April at the Limerick Generating Station and other commercial nuclear power plants nationwide.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. at the Limerick Township Municipal Building, 646 W. Ridge

Pike, in Limerick. Members of the public will have the opportunity to ask questions of NRC staff

during and after the meeting.

The new oversight process uses more objective, timely and safety-significant criteria in

assessing performance while seeking to more effectively and efficiently regulate the industry. Under

the new process, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional office-based personnel are

supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance indicators. These

performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant operations, including the viability of

redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection and security measures.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC’s web site every three months. The safety significance of each inspection finding or performance

indicator is characterized by a color -- green, white, yellow or red.

The NRC response to the inspection finding and performance indicators will be based on the

significance of the items. A green finding receives normal NRC oversight, while white, yellow or red

assessments receive increasing NRC involvement. Multiple red findings could result in a plant

shutdown.

A plain language summary of the reactor oversight process is available from the NRC Office of

Public Affairs or on the web site at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm

Detailed information regarding the reactor oversight process is available on the web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html

#
#### § 145.32 Bona-fide gifts.

The port director shall pass free of duty and tax, without preparing an entry as provided for in § 145.12, articles sent as bona-fide gifts from persons in foreign countries to persons in the United States having an aggregate fair retail value in the country of shipment not exceeding $100 ($200, in the case of articles sent from persons in the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa), subject to the requirements set forth in §§ 10.152 and 10.153 of this chapter.

[T.D. 94-51, 59 FR 30296, June 13, 1994]
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                |   |                                 |
|---------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                |   |                                 |   |
| March      31, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Paul      Campbell          |   |
|                |   | Paul      Campbell                   |   |
|                |   | Interim      Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                |   |                                 |   |
### §661f. Effect on other laws

#### (a) Effect on other laws

This subchapter shall supersede, modify, or repeal any provision of law enacted prior to November 5, 1990, to the extent such provision is inconsistent with this subchapter. Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to establish a credit limitation on any Federal loan or loan guarantee program.

#### (b) Crediting of collections

Collections resulting from direct loans obligated or loan guarantees committed prior to October 1, 1991, shall be credited to the liquidating accounts of Federal agencies. Amounts so credited shall be available, to the same extent that they were available prior to November 5, 1990, to liquidate obligations arising from such direct loans obligated or loan guarantees committed prior to October 1, 1991, including repayment of any obligations held by the Secretary of the Treasury or the Federal Financing Bank. The unobligated balances of such accounts that are in excess of current needs shall be transferred to the general fund of the Treasury. Such transfers shall be made from time to time but, at least once each year.

(Pub. L. 93–344, title V, §507, as added Pub. L. 101–508, title XIII, §13201(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–614.)
EXHIBIT 32

Certification pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

John S. Long, President and Chief Executive Officer, and John M. Digby, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer, of Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006 and
that to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc. and
will be retained by Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                   |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|September 25, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ John S. Long                     
|Date               |  |  |  | John S. Long                         
|                   |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                   |  | 
|September 25, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ John M. Digby                    
|Date               |  |  |  | John M. Digby                        
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
### §6591. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–94, div. E, title II, §212(a)(3)(H), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2776

Section, Pub. L. 88–426, title II, §203(g), Aug. 14, 1964, 78 Stat. 415; Pub. L. 93–371, §4, Aug. 13, 1974, 88 Stat. 429; Pub. L. 94–59, title I, §105, July 25, 1975, 89 Stat. 275; Pub. L. 116–94, div. E, title II, §212(a)(3)(A), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2775, related to compensation of Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of Senate.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on the later of the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2020, or the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after Dec. 20, 2019, see section 212(c) of Pub. L. 116–94, set out as a note under section 282b of this title.
#### Taylor vs. Illinois Public Aid Commission.

#### *207Thomas Taylor, Claimant, *vs.*Illinois Public Aid Commission, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 14, 1943.*

*209ADVISORY OPINIOH BY MR. CHIEF JUSTICE DAMROH

From the above statement of facts we find that on the date of injury, claimant and respondent were operating under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of this State; that on such date claimant sustained accidental injuries which arose out of and in the course of his employment; that notice of the accident was given to respondent, and claim for compensation on account thereof was made within the time required by the provisions of Section 8 (d-1) of said Act.

Section 8, sub-section (a) of said Act provides:

“The employer shall provide the necessary first aid, medical and surgical services, and all necessary medical, surgical and hospital services thereafter, limited, however, to that which is reasonably required *to*cure or relieve from the effects of the injury * *

The proof here shows that the following bills were incurred and are unpaid :

Graham Hospital, Canton, Illinois.............................$118.90

Dr. J. C. Simmons............................................. 150.00

The record further discloses that said bills are reasonable.

We therefore find that claimant is entitled to payment of said items under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, and we are of the opinion that the Commission is properly justified in recognizing and paying said claim in the sum of Two Hundred Sixty-eight Dollars and Ninety Cents ($268.90). No question of compensation is raised for temporary or permanent disability. Payment of the claim, in the sum of Two Hundred Sixty-eight Dollars and Ninety Cents ($268.90) is recommended, same to be made by the Illinois Public Aid Commission out of any funds held by it and allocated for such purposes.