alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6515. Payment of fees for services of Attending Physician and for use of Senate health and fitness facilities

#### (a) Regulations

The Senate Committee on Rules and Administration shall promulgate regulations—

(1) pertaining to the services provided by the Attending Physician and the operation and use of the Senate health and fitness facilities; and

(2) requiring the payment of fees for services received from the Attending Physician and for the use of the Senate health and fitness facilities pursuant to such regulations.

#### (b) Withholding of fees from salary

The Secretary of the Senate is authorized to withhold fees from the salary of an individual authorized by such regulations to receive such services from the Attending Physician and to use the Senate health and fitness facilities.

#### (c) Deposit in General Fund

The Secretary of the Senate shall remit all fees required by subsection (a)(2) that are collected pursuant to subsection (b) or by direct payment to the General Fund of the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts unless otherwise provided by law.

#### (d) Effective date

The provision 1 of this section shall take effect on April 9, 1992.

(Pub. L. 102–392, title III, §314, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1723.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 121e of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1993.

1 So in original. Probably should be "provisions".
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

101 Marietta St., Suite 2900, Atlanta, GA 30323

Tel. 404-331-5503 or 7878

No.: II-97-13 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: Ken Clark 404-331-5503 (Friday, January 24, 1997)

Roger Hannah 404-331-7878

NRC SCHEDULES DESIGN INSPECTION EXIT MEETING AT ST. LUCIE PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public

exit meeting at Florida Power & Light’s St. Lucie nuclear power

plant to discuss the results of a special NRC design inspection at

the plant. That meeting will be Tuesday, January 28 at 3:00 p.m. in

Room 123 of the plant's Training Building.

The design inspection began in late November and concluded

Friday, January 10. The inspection was led by Jeff Jacobson from

the NRC’s headquarters office in Rockville, Maryland and included

six inspectors working under contract to the NRC. The inspection at

St. Lucie was the first in a series, and similar inspections will be

performed periodically over the next two years at other plants.

The design inspections focus on reviews of the plants' original

design and configuration, and conformance with the licensees' safety

analysis report. Each inspection team is made up of engineers from

NRC and design specialists from either Stone & Webster or Sargent &

Lundy, architect/engineering firms with which NRC has contracted.

The NRC planned these inspections after recent findings that

licensees at the Millstone plant in Connecticut and at other

facilities routinely performed full-core offloads during refueling

outages without performing the necessary safety evaluation. It also

was discovered that other facilities' actual as-built configuration

or operations were inconsistent with the design basis information

described in their licenses. Special care is taken to avoid having

inspections performed by representatives of the

architectural/engineering firm which originally designed a power

plant.

During the St. Lucie inspection, no issues were identified that

would raise an immediate operability question. A written report on

the inspection is expected by late February.

###
### §29. Condensed and simplified versions of House precedents; other useful materials in summary form; form and distribution to Members of Congress, Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico, and others; appointment and compensation of personnel; utilization of services of personnel of Federal agencies

The Parliamentarian of the House of Representatives shall prepare, compile, and maintain on a current basis and in cumulative form, for each Congress commencing with the Ninety-third Congress a condensed and, insofar as practicable, up-to-date version of all of the parliamentary precedents of the House of Representatives which have current use and application in the House, together with informative text prepared by the Parliamentarian and other useful related material in summary form. The Parliamentarian shall have such matter printed for each Congress on pages of such size and in such type and format as he considers advisable to promote the usefulness of such matter to the Members of the House and shall provide a printed copy thereof to each Member in each Congress, including the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico, and may make such other distribution of such printed copies as he considers advisable. In carrying out this section, the Parliamentarian may appoint and fix the pay of personnel and utilize the services of personnel of the Library of Congress and the Government Publishing Office.

(Pub. L. 91–510, title III, §332, Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1186; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(b), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Government Publishing Office" substituted for "Government Printing Office" in text on authority of section 1301(b) of Pub. L. 113–235, set out as a note preceding section 301 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.

#### Effective Date

Section effective immediately prior to noon on Jan. 3, 1971, see section 601(1) of Pub. L. 91–510, set out as an Effective Date of 1970 Amendment note under section 4301 of this title.
#### § 210.77 [Reserved]
SCPW-22-0000511

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

________________________________________________________________

DEXTER K. KA ʻ IAMA, Petitioner,

vs.

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Respondent,

________________________________________________________________

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(ODC No. 18-0339)

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the materials submitted on

August 25, 2022 to the appellate clerks by attorney Dexter K.

Ka ʻ iama, which was filed as a petition for a writ of mandamus, we

conclude that attorney Ka ʻ iama seeks relief from the Disciplinary

Board of the Hawai ʻ i Supreme Court, not from this court.

Therefore, Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-22-0000511

31-AUG-2022

11:44 AM

Dkt. 7 ORD2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is denied

without prejudice to attorney Ka ʻ iama seeking relief from the

Disciplinary Board.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, Augus t 31 , 2022.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11

                            INFOMED HOLDINGS, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
                   FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE:                                                             1996            1995         
                                                                                    -----------     -----------      
<S>                                                                                 <C>             <C>                       
NET INCOME                                                                          $    11,332     $     47,927      

Less dividends on the Company's preferred stock                                         (66,250)         (66,250)
                                                                                    -----------     ------------ 

        Net loss available to common shareholders                                   $   (54,918)    $    (18,323)
                                                                                    ===========     ============ 

Weighted average common shares outstanding                                            2,348,155        2,318,445
                                                                                    ===========     ============ 

Net loss per share                                                                  $     (0.02)    $      (0.01)
                                                                                    ===========     ============ 

</TABLE>






        Fully diluted earnings per share is not presented as amounts do
           not differ significantly from primary earnings per share.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-014 March 7, 2002

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC TO MEET WITH ENTERGY TO DISCUSS INDIAN POINT 2 PERFORMANCE

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Entergy Nuclear on

Thursday, March 14, to discuss the results of the agencyís annual assessment of safety performance at

the Indian Point 2 nuclear power plant. The facility is located in Buchanan, N.Y., and is operated by

Entergy Nuclear.

 The meeting, which will be the open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 7

p.m. in the large meeting room at Crystal Bay on the Hudson, Charles Point Marina, 5 John Walsh

Boulevard, Peekskill, N.Y. NRC officials will be available afterwards to answer questions.

 The performance period to be discussed is April 1, 2001, to December 31, 2001. In addition,

Entergy Nuclear representatives will discuss continuing performance improvement efforts, including

specific actions in the area of problem identification/resolution and human performance.

 A letter sent from the NRC Region I office to Entergy Nuclear addresses plant performance

during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the NRC

web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/inpt_2001q4.pdf

 Current performance information for Indian Point 2 is available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/IP2/ip2_chart.html

###
J. 

J. 

Douglas 

J. 

criminal record that worked to his extreme detriment. See Edwards v. 

State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2 

Gibbons 

cc: Thomas L. Stockard, District Judge 

Robert E. Estes, Senior Judge 

Stephen D. Laxalt 

Churchill County District Attorney/Fallon 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Churchill County Clerk 

2We rescind the order for a supplemental record on appeal as the 

record on appeal filed on May 8, 2013, contains the documents necessary 

for this court's review. 

We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in 

proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude 

that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent 

that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those 

submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings 

below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
### SUBCHAPTER I—FEDERAL ROYALTY MANAGEMENT AND ENFORCEMENT
### §156. Gifts, etc., to Library of Congress Trust Fund Board

The Board is authorized to accept, receive, hold, and administer such gifts, bequests, or devises of property for the benefit of, or in connection with, the Library, its collections, or its service, as may be approved by the Board and by the Joint Committee on the Library.

(Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 423, §2, formerly §1, 43 Stat. 1107, renumbered Apr. 13, 1936, ch. 213, 49 Stat. 1205.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of first par. of section 2 of act Mar. 3, 1925. Second, third, and fourth pars. of section 2 are classified to sections 157, 158, and 158a of this title, respectively.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00152-CR

Miguel Gonzalez Mejia

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

430th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR-1370-16-J

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 27, 2018
§ 182.16 Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment. ( a ) *General.* If the importer fails to comply with applicable requirements under this subpart, including submission of a complete certification of origin prepared in accordance with §§ 182.12 and 182.14, when requested, CBP may deny preferential tariff treatment to the imported good.
( b ) *Failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment.* Where the requirements for preferential tariff treatment set forth elsewhere in this subpart are met, CBP nevertheless may deny preferential tariff treatment to an originating good if the good is transported outside the territories of the USMCA countries, and at the request of CBP, the importer of the good does not provide evidence demonstrating to the satisfaction of CBP that the transit and transshipment conditions set forth in Appendix A of this part were met.
[CBP Dec. 21-10, 86 FR 35585, July 6, 2021]
§ 200.735-105 Gifts, entertainment, and favors. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no employee may solicit or accept, directly or indirectly, any gift, gratuity, favor, entertainment, loan, or any other thing of monetary value from any person who: ( 1 ) Has, or is seeking to obtain, contractual or other business or financial relations with the Commission;
( 2 ) Conducts operations or activities that are being investigated by the Commission; or
( 3 ) Has interests that may be substantially affected by the performance or nonperformance of the employee's official duty.
( b ) The prohibitions set forth under paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply to: ( 1 ) Solicitations or acceptances based on obvious family or personal relationships (such as those between parents, children, or spouse of the employee and the employee) when the circumstances make it clear that it is those relationships rather than the business of the persons concerned which are the motivating factors;
( 2 ) The acceptance of food and refreshments of nominal value on infrequent occasions in the ordinary course of a luncheon or dinner meeting or other meeting or on a field trip, and of ground transportation of nominal value in the course of a field trip, where an employee may properly be in attendance.
( 3 ) The acceptance of loans from banks or other financial institutions on customary terms to finance proper and usual activities of employees, such as home mortgage loans; and
( 4 ) The acceptance of unsolicited advertising or promotional material, such as pens, pencils, note pads, calendars, and other items of nominal value.
( c ) An employee shall not solicit a contribution from another employee for a gift to an official superior, make a donation as a gift to an official superior, or accept a gift from an employee receiving less pay than himself (5 U.S.C. 7351). However, this paragraph does not prohibit a voluntary gift of nominal value or donation in a nominal amount made on a special occasion such as marriage, illness, or retirement.
( d ) An employee shall not accept a gift, present, decoration, or other thing from a foreign government unless authorized by Congress as provided by the Constitution and in 5 U.S.C. 7342.
( e ) Neither this section nor § 200.735-106 precludes an employee from receipt of bona fide reimbursement, unless prohibited by law, for expenses of travel and such other necessary subsistence as is compatible with this part for which no Government payment or reimbursement is made. However, this paragraph does not allow an employee to be reimbursed, or payment to be made on his behalf, for excessive personal living expenses, gifts, entertainment or other personal benefits, nor does it allow an employee to be reimbursed by a person for travel on official business under agency orders when reimbursement is proscribed by Decision B-128527 of the Comptroller General dated March 7, 1967.
[32 FR 16210, Nov. 28, 1967, as amended at 46 FR 41036, Aug. 14, 1981]
#### Edward A. X. Hartmann, Respondent, *v.*Paul Armstrong, Appellant.

Appeal from an order, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 25th day of February, 1915, denying a motion to vacate an order for the examination of a witness before trial, etc.

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from is modified by restricting the examination to matters concerning the receipt and contents of the letter specified in the affidavit of the plaintiff’s attorney, and by striking out the provision for the production of such letter. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.
§ 207.45 Investigation to review outstanding determination. ( a ) *Request for review.* Any person may file with the Commission a request for the institution of a review investigation under section 751(b) of the Act. The person making the request shall also promptly serve copies of the request on the parties to the original investigation upon which the review is to be based. All requests shall set forth a description of changed circumstances sufficient to warrant the institution of a review investigation by the Commission.
( b ) *Notice of receipt of a request.* Upon the receipt of a properly filed and sufficient request for a review investigation, the Secretary shall publish a notice of having received such a request in the Federal Register inviting public comment on the question of whether the Commission should institute a review investigation. Persons shall have at least thirty (30) days from the date of publication in the Federal Register within which to submit comments to the Commission.
( c ) *Institution of an investigation.* Within forty-five (45) days after the close of the period for public comments following publication of the receipt of a request, the Commission shall determine whether the request shows changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a review and, if so, shall institute a review investigation. The Commission may also institute a review investigation on its own initiative. The review investigation shall be instituted by notice published in the Federal Register and shall be completed within one hundred eighty (180) days of the date of such publication. If the Commission determines that a request does not show changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a review, the request shall be dismissed and a notice of the dismissal published in the Federal Register stating the reasons therefor.
( d ) *Conduct of review investigation.* The procedures set forth in subpart C of part 207 shall apply to all investigations instituted under this section.
[56 FR 11929, Mar. 21, 1991, as amended at 63 FR 30607, June 5, 1998; 79 FR 35925, June 25, 2014]
### §58b. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–137, §2, Oct. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 819

Section, Pub. L. 97–12, title I, §110, June 5, 1981, 95 Stat. 62; Pub. L. 97–51, §125, Oct. 1, 1981, 95 Stat. 965; Pub. L. 98–367, title I, §11(a), July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 476; Pub. L. 99–349, title I, §2(a), (b), July 2, 1986, 100 Stat. 741, 742, provided for transfer to a Senator's Official Office Expense Account of that Senator's clerk hire allowance funds remaining at end of fiscal year. See section 6313 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 100–137, §2, Oct. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 819, provided that the repeal is effective Jan. 1, 1988.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-213 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, December 1, 1998)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received four reports in the form of letters

from its Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards following the Committee’s meetings on

November 4-7. The reports provide comments on:

-- Proposed revision to the enforcement policy;

-- Proposed rule on the use of alternative source term at operating reactors;

-- Safety evaluation report related to Westinghouse Owners Group application of risk-informed

methods to inservice inspection of piping, topical report (WCAP-14572, Revision 1);

-- Reprioritization and proposed resolution of generic safety issue-171, “Engineered safety

features failure from loss-of-offsite-power subsequent to a loss-of-coolant accident.”

Copies of the reports are available through the NRC’s Office of Public Affairs, the NRC’s

Internet homepage (www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW) and the Public Document Room.

###
§ 172.42 Supplemental petition decision authority. ( a ) *Decisions of Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officers.* Supplemental petitions filed on cases where the original decision was made by the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer, will be initially reviewed by that official. The Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer may choose to grant more relief and issue a decision indicating additional relief to the petitioner. If the petitioner is dissatisfied with the further relief granted or if the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer decides to grant no further relief, the supplemental petition will be forwarded to a designated Headquarters official assigned to a field location for review and decision.
( b ) *Decisions of CBP Headquarters.* Supplemental petitions filed on cases where the original decision was made by the Chief, Penalties Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade, CBP Headquarters, will be forwarded to the Director, Border Security and Trade Compliance Division, Regulations and Rulings, for review and decision.
( c ) *Authority of Executive Director.* Any authority given to any Headquarters official by this part may also be exercised by the Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade, or his designee.
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 4(i)(v)

                      [WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES LETTERHEAD]

                                November 21, 2002

VIA FACSIMILE AND OVERNIGHT CARRIER

PNC Bank, National Association
249 5th Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222
Attention: David Gookin

                  Re:      Termination of 364-Day Revolving Credit

Dear David:

                  Reference is hereby made to the 364-Day Revolving Credit
Agreement dated as of May 10, 2002 among Worthington Industries, Inc. (the
"Borrower"), the Lenders party thereto, and PNC Bank, National Association, as
Administrative Agent (the "364-Day Credit Agreement"). This letter constitutes
notice, pursuant to Section 2.10(a) of the 364-Day Credit Agreement, of
Borrower's request that the Revolving Committed Amount under, and as defined in,
the 364-Day Credit Agreement be terminated in full as of November 29, 2002.

                  Please call if you have questions or need additional
information, and fax an executed acknowledgment of this letter to me at
614.438.7508. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

                                    Sincerely,

                                    /s/ John T. Baldwin

                                    John T. Baldwin
                                    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Acknowledged:

PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent


By: /s/ David B. Gookin
   ---------------------------------
Name: David B. Gookin
Title: Managing Director