alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-02-023 May 2, 2002

CONTACT: Breck Henderson E-mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

NRC NAMES SCOTT SCHWIND SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT COOPER NUCLEAR STATION

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has named Scott Schwind Senior Resident Inspector

at Cooper Nuclear Station, a nuclear power plant near Brownville, Nebraska. He joins Michael Hay,

the resident inspector at the plant.

Mr. Schwind graduated from West Texas State University with a bachelor’s degree in

mathematics and physics in 1989. Following graduation he served as an officer in the U.S. Navy

aboard nuclear powered submarines until 1994. He then worked as a systems engineer for the U.S.

Department of Energy at the Pantex Nuclear Weapons Plant in Amarillo, Texas, until 1997.

In 1997, Mr. Schwind joined the NRC at its Region I office in King of Prussia, Penn., as a

reactor engineer. He has served as resident inspector at the Indian Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2, in

Buchanan, N.Y., and at Comanche Peak, near Glen Rose, Texas, prior to his assignment as senior

resident inspector at Cooper.

Mr. Schwind will reside in Nemaha.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They

serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections and monitoring

significant work projects. 

###
#### § 210.58 Provisional acceptance of the motion.

The Commission shall determine whether to accept a motion for temporary relief at the same time it determines whether to institute an investigation on the basis of the complaint. That determination shall be made within 35 days after the complaint and motion for temporary relief are filed, unless the 35-day period is restarted pursuant to § 210.53(a), § 210.54, § 210.55, or § 210.57, or exceptional circumstances exist which preclude adherence to the prescribed deadline. (See § 210.10(a)(1).) Before the Commission determines whether to provisionally accept a motion for temporary relief, the motion will be examined for sufficiency and compliance with §§ 210.52, 210.53(a) (if applicable), 210.54 through 210.56, as well as §§ 210.4 and 210.5. The motion will be subject to the same type of preliminary investigatory activity as the complaint. (See § 210.9(b).) Acceptance of a motion pursuant to this paragraph constitutes provisional acceptance for referral of the motion to the chief administrative law judge, who will assign the motion to a presiding administrative law judge for issuance of an initial determination under § 210.66(a). Commission rejection of an insufficient or improperly filed complaint will preclude acceptance of a motion for temporary relief. Commission rejection of a motion for temporary relief will not preclude institution of an investigation of the complaint.

[59 FR 39039, Aug. 1, 1994, as amended at 78 FR 23486, Apr. 19, 2013]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRATED FROM FORM 10-K AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          31,884
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                26,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    843,194
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        651,745
<ALLOWANCE>                                      7,276
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,595,844
<DEPOSITS>                                     950,808
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             10,441
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           264
<OTHER-SE>                                     328,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,595,844
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 44,375
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               42,089
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   290
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                86,754
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              31,374
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,512
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           49,242
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,200
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 163
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 44,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,597
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,526
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,526
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.22
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,534
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,470
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      533
<RECOVERIES>                                       139
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,276
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             7,276
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          7,276
        

</TABLE>
### §285f. Expenditures

In accordance with policies and procedures approved by the Speaker, the Law Revision Counsel is authorized to make such expenditures as may be necessary or appropriate for the functioning of the Office.

(Pub. L. 93–554, title I, ch. III, §101, Dec. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1777.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is based on section 205(g) of House Resolution No. 988, Ninety-third Congress, Oct. 8, 1974, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 93–554.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Gondwana Energy Ltd. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Arne Raabe, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.
|    |                                                                                                                                                                  
|    | Dated this 9th day of February, 2006.                                                                                                                            

/s/ Arne Raabe Arne Raabe
      Chief Financial Officer


---
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.3    
  


 
 

CERTIFICATE OF INCREASE
  OF
  AUTHORIZED NUMBER OF SHARES
  OF
  SERIES C CUMULATIVE REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK
  OF
  THE MILLS CORPORATION    
  


Pursuant
to Section 151 of the

General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware 


        THE
MILLS CORPORATION, a corporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), 


        DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY: 


        That
the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was filed in the office of the Secretary of State of Delaware on April 19, 1994, a First Amendment to
the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was filed in the office of the Secretary of State of Delaware on August 7, 1997 and a Certificate of the Designation,
Preferences and Rights of Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, was filed in said office of the Secretary of State on December 16, 2002. 


        That
the Board of Directors of the Corporation by unanimous consent dated January 17, 2003 duly adopted a resolution authorizing and directing an increase in the authorized number
of shares of Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of the Corporation, from 3,450,000 shares to 3,500,000 shares, all in accordance with the provisions of Section 151 of The
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 







        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, The Mills Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by Thomas E. Frost, its Executive Vice President and Corporate Secretary, this        day of
January, 2003. 



	 	 	THE MILLS CORPORATION
	

 	
 	
By:	

 
	 	 	 	
 Thomas E. Frost

Executive Vice President and Corporate Secretary
	

Witness	
 	

 	

 
	

 Mary Ellen Seravalli

Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel	
 	

 	

 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.3


CERTIFICATE OF INCREASE OF AUTHORIZED NUMBER OF SHARES OF SERIES C CUMULATIVE REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK OF THE MILLS CORPORATION
466 P.2d 871

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tobias J. ORTEGA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 9023.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

March 23, 1970.

Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 388, 81 N.M. 337, 466 P.2d 903, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,379
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,562
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,012
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,396
<PP&E>                                         110,563
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,187)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 184,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,763
<BONDS>                                        110,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           59,614
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,381
<OTHER-SE>                                    (16,198)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   184,020
<SALES>                                         77,328
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,171
<CGS>                                           31,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,632
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,485
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,946)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,946)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,946)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
114 STAT. 1312 PUBLIC LAW 106–338—OCT. 19, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4534:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Sept. 6, considered and passed House.

Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–338

106th Congress

An Act

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 114

Ridge Street, N.W. in Lenoir, North Carolina, as the ‘‘James T. Broyhill Post

Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

114 Ridge Street, N.W. in Lenoir, North Carolina, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘James T. Broyhill Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘James

T. Broyhill Post Office Building’’.

Approved October 19, 2000.

Oct. 19, 2000

[H.R. 4534]
### §803. Mines subject to coverage

Each coal or other mine, the products of which enter commerce, or the operations or products of which affect commerce, and each operator of such mine, and every miner in such mine shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 91–173, §4, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 744; Pub. L. 95–164, title I, §102(c), Nov. 9, 1977, 91 Stat. 1291.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 91–173, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 742, known as the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 801 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1977—Pub. L. 95–164 inserted "or other" after "coal".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1977 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–164 effective 120 days after Nov. 9, 1977, except as otherwise provided, see section 307 of Pub. L. 95–164, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.
1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-4126

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Robert Bailey, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: August 28, 2007 Filed: August 28, 2007

___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Robert Bailey challenges the 169-month prison sentence imposed by the district court 1 following his guilty plea to possessing and aiding and abetting the possession of pseudoephedrine, knowing it would be used to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(c)(2) . The district court sentenced Bailey within a Guidelines range that was enhanced base d on application of the career offender Guideline, U.S.S.G. § 4B 1.1. On appeal, Bailey argues that the district court erred when it declined his request for a downw ard sentencing variance based on the late-2- onset of his criminal behavior caused by hi s addiction to methamphetamine; he argues that the sentence creates unwarranted sentencing disparities. We reject these arguments and affirm.
This court reviews the sentence for abuse of discretion, see United States v. Long Soldier , 431 F.3d 1120, 1123 (8th Cir. 2005), and applies a presumption of reasonableness to a sentence imposedwithin the Guidelines range, see Rita v. United States , 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462 (2007); United States v. Shields , No. 06-3573, 2007 WL 2301911, at *5 (8th Cir. Aug. 14, 2007). The application of the career offender Guideline was not a matter left to the district court’s discretion, see United States v. Berni , 439 F.3d 990, 992 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 2946 (2006), and Bailey’s sentence is comparable to sentences imposed on others who have similar records and are deemed career offenders, see United States v. Plaza , 471 F.3d 876, 880 (8th Cir. 2006) (in evaluating potential disparity, court must compare defendants with similar records). Upon careful review, we conclude that th e district court did not fail to consider a relevant factor that should have receive d significant weight, did not give significant weight to an improper or irrelevant f actor, and did not commit a clear error of judgment. See Long Soldier , 431 F.3d at 1123 (defining abuse of discretion); cf. United States v. Lee , 454 F.3d 836, 839 (8th Cir. 2006) (drug abuse and age are not proper reasons to impose downward varian ce absent exceptional circumstances such as infirmity). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

______________________________
§ 191.13 Packaging materials. ( a ) *Imported packaging material.* Drawback of duties is provided in § 313(q)(1) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(q)(1)), on imported packaging material when used to package or repackage merchandise or articles exported or destroyed pursuant to § 313(a), (b), (c), or (j) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(a), (b), (c), or (j)). Drawback is payable on the packaging material pursuant to the particular drawback provision to which the packaged goods themselves are subject. The drawback will be based on the duty, tax or fee paid on the importation of the packaging material. The packaging material must be separately identified on the claim, and all other information and documents required for the particular drawback provision under which the claim is made shall be provided for the packaging material.
( b ) *Packaging material manufactured in United States from imported materials.* Drawback of duties is provided in § 313(q)(2) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(q)(2)), on packaging material that is manufactured or produced in the United States from imported materials and used to package or repackage articles that are exported or destroyed under § 313(a) or (b) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b)). Drawback is payable on the packaging material under the particular manufacturing drawback provision to which the packaged articles themselves are subject, either 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b), as applicable. The drawback will be based on the duty, tax, or fee that is paid on the imported merchandise used to manufacture or produce the packaging material. The packaging material and the imported merchandise used in its manufacture or production must be separately identified on the claim, and all other information and documents required for the particular drawback provision under which the claim is made must be provided for the packaging material as well as the imported merchandise used in its manufacture or production, for purposes of determining the applicable drawback payable.
[T.D. 98-16, 63 FR 11006, Mar. 5, 1998, as amended by T.D. 02-16, 67 FR 16637, Apr. 8, 2002]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4407-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2018-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of California (FEMA-4407-DR), dated November 12, 2018, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued November 29, 2018.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective November 25, 2018.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2018-27152 Filed 12-13-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9111-11-P
### §205. Consolidation of leases

If, in the judgment of the Secretary of the Interior, the public interest will be subserved thereby, lessees holding under lease areas not exceeding the maximum permitted under this chapter may consolidate their leases through the surrender of the original leases and the inclusion of such areas in a new lease of not to exceed two thousand five hundred and sixty acres of contiguous lands.

(Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, §5, 41 Stat. 439.)
STEAM ELECTRIC REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 200 9-0 819

DCN: SE02120.A1

This media is not available in Regulations.gov. Contact the EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room to view or receive a copy of this document. Requests for copies may be made

as follows: In person/writing: Environmental Protection Agency, Docket Center 1301 Constitution Ave NW, 2822T, Room 3334 Washington, DC. 20004 Telephone: 202-566-1744 Fax: 202-566- 9744 Email: docket-customerservice@epa.gov

Final version of the steam electric sampling analytical database including all EPA sampling data and monitoring data used for development of the effluent limits and pollutant loadings.