alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

HOWARD COHAN,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO.: 0:20-cv-61697-AHS

vs.

COCONUT CREEK HOTEL M-RI, LLLP

a Florida Limited Liability Partnership

d/b/a RESIDENCE INN BY MARRIOTT

Defendant(s).

____________________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

The Plaintiff, HOWARD COHAN and the Defendant, COCONUT CREEK HOTEL MRI, LLLP, a Florida Limited Liability Partnership, d/b/a RESIDENCE INN BY MARRIOTT, (the 

Parties) hereby stipulate that (1) the Parties have settled this action; (2) Plaintiff voluntarily 

dismisses this action with prejudice against COCONUT CREEK HOTEL M-RI, LLLP, a Florida 

Limited Liability Partnership, d/b/a RESIDENCE INN BY MARRIOTT; (3) the Parties shall bear 

their own costs and fees except as provided for in the Parties’ Settlement Agreement; and (4) the 

Parties condition the stipulation upon this Court entering an order retaining jurisdiction to enforce 

the terms of the Parties’ Settlement Agreement. See Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 

F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2012).

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED December 21, 2020.

By: /s/ Gregory S. Sconzo

Gregory S. Sconzo, Esq.

Florida Bar No.: 0105553

Sconzo Law Office, P.A.

3825 PGA Boulevard, Suite 207

Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410

Telephone: (561) 729-0940

Facsimile: (561) 491-9459

Primary Email: greg@sconzolawoffice.com 

Secondary Email: alexa@sconzolawoffice.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

By: /s/ Adam J. Hodkin

Adam J. Hodkin, Esq

Florida Bar No.: 962597

HODKIN STAGE WARD, PLLC

Attorneys for Coconut Creek Hotel M-RI, LLLP

54 SW Boca Raton Blvd

Boca Raton, Florida 33432

Phone: 561.810.1600

Fax: 561.300.2128

ahodkin@hswlawgroup.com

jshand@hswlawgroup.com

Case 0:20-cv-61697-AHS Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December 21, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document 

is being served this day on counsel of record in this action via transmission of Notices of Electronic 

Filing generated by CM/ECF.

_ /s/ Gregory S. Sconzo

Gregory S. Sconzo, Esq.

Case 0:20-cv-61697-AHS Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2020 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         894,298
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,389,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                   186,987
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,709,829
<PP&E>                                      16,254,948
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,757,248
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,780,807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,837,864
<BONDS>                                     18,262,985
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,768
<OTHER-SE>                                  53,340,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                54,780,807
<SALES>                                     20,061,959
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,061,959
<CGS>                                       17,487,823
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,487,823
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               107,501
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (889,720)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (889,720)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (889,720)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (889,720)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.52)
        

</TABLE>
### §1009. Relinquishment of geothermal rights

The holder of any geothermal lease at any time may make and file in the appropriate land office a written relinquishment of all rights under such lease or of any legal subdivision of the area covered by such lease. Such relinquishment shall be effective as of the date of its filing. Thereupon the lessee shall be released of all obligations thereafter accruing under said lease with respect to the lands relinquished, but no such relinquishment shall release such lessee, or his surety or bond, from any liability for breach of any obligation of the lease, other than an obligation to drill, accrued at the date of the relinquishment, or from the continued obligation, in accordance with the applicable lease terms and regulations, (1) to make payment of all accrued rentals and royalties, (2) to place all wells on the relinquished lands in condition for suspension or abandonment, and (3) to protect or restore substantially the surface and surface resources.

(Pub. L. 91–581, §10, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1570; Pub. L. 109–58, title II, §236(10), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 672.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2005—Pub. L. 109–58 inserted section catchline.
Exhibit 15.4





[Levy Cohen and Co. Letterhead]





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



OF



Pilat Europe Limited



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-156686) of our report dated February 6, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Pilat
Europe Limited as of December 31, 2013, which report appears in Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of Formula Systems
(1985) Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2013.



|Yours sincerely,      
|----------------------
|LEVY COHEN & CO.      
|/s/ Levy Cohen and Co.



Registered Auditors and certified public accountants



37 Broadhurst Gardens

London

NW6 3QT

31 December 2014
|                                                                              |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| formerly the National Oceanographic Data Center (NODC)...  more on NCEI |
|                                                                              | This Site        All of NOAA |

**NCEI is transitioning to a new website and paths to data resources will be changing. Please contact NCEI.Info@noaa.gov with any questions of issues. See the new website at www.ncei.noaa.gov.**

| Murmansk Marine Biological Institute, RUSSIA;  Ocean Climate Laboratory, NODC/NOAA, USA    Presented are physical andbiological data for the region extending from the Barents Sea to the KaraSea during 158 scientific cruises for the period 1913-1999. Maps with thetemporal distribution of physical and biological variables of theBarents and Kara Seas are presented, with proposed quality control criteriafor phytoplankton and zooplankton data. Changes in the plankton communitystructure between the 1930s, 1950s, and 1990s are discussed. Multipletables of Arctic Seas phytoplankton and zooplankton species are presented,containing ecological and geographic characteristics for each species,and images of live cells for the dominant phytoplankton species. |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 115.13 Records to be furnished Customs. Each Certifying Authority shall furnish the Headquarters, U.S. Customs Service, Office of Field Operations, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20229, unless waived by Customs; ( a ) A copy of each issued certificate of approval for containers and road vehicles and a copy of the plans and application to which the approval refers;
( b ) A copy of each issued individual approval for a container or road vehicle.
[T.D. 86-92, 51 FR 16161, May 1, 1986, as amended by T.D. 99-27, 64 FR 13675, Mar. 22, 1999]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-152 December 2, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC TO MEET WITH PSE&G TO DISCUSS APPARENT HARASSMENT

OF SECURITY OFFICER AT ARTIFICIAL ISLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

officials of Public Service Electric and Gas Company on Tuesday,

December 9, to discuss an apparent violation of NRC requirements

involving the harassment of a security officer at Artificial

Island.

The meeting, which is open to the public for observation

will be held at 10 a.m. in the Region I Public Meeting Room, at

475 Allendale Road in King of Prussia, Pa.

An NRC investigation found that a security officer was

allegedly placed on annual leave without pay for speaking with

the NRC regarding a security incident on June 5. The incident

involved the failure to test an intrusion detection system.

The decision to hold a pre-decisional enforcement conference

does not mean that the NRC has determined that a violation has

occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the

purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and

safety significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to

point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC

inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline its

proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this

conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials

at a later time.

#
§ 190.163 Documentation. ( a ) *Entry.* A drawback entry must be filed to claim drawback under this subpart.
( b ) *Documentation.* The drawback entry for unmerchantable merchandise must be accompanied by a certificate of the importer setting forth in detail the facts which cause the merchandise to be unmerchantable and any additional evidence that the drawback office requires to establish that the merchandise is unmerchantable.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.56 Vegetable oils, denaturing; release. ( a ) Olive, palm-kernel, rapeseed, sunflower, and sesame oil shall be classifiable under subheadings 1509.10.20, 1509.10.40, 1509.90.20, 1509.90.40, 1510.00.20, 1512.19.20, 1513.29.00, 1514.90.10, 1514.90.50, 1515.50.00, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, if denatured abroad or under Customs supervision after importation but before release from Customs custody, at the request and expense of the importer, by a formula prescribed by Headquarters, U.S. Customs Service, or if by their method of production abroad they are rendered unfit for use as food or for any but mechanical or manufacturing purposes.
( b ) Each cask or package of oil claimed to have been before importation denatured or otherwise rendered unfit for use as food or for any but mechanical or manufacturing purposes shall be sampled and tested by an appraising officer.
( c ) Formulas prescribed by Headquarters, U.S. Customs Service, except proprietary mixtures, will be circulated to all Customs officers and will appear as abstracts of United States Customs Service decisions published in the weekly Customs Bulletins. Proprietary mixtures approved by the Commissioner of Customs will not be published but appropriate notice of their approval will be given to all Customs officers.
( d ) The Headquarters, U.S. Customs Service, will from time to time prescribe additional formulas, and will consider any formula for special denaturing that may be submitted.
( e ) The Center director may, if he deems it advisable, require an importer requesting permission to use any authorized denaturant to submit to the appraiser an adequate sample of such denaturant, in order that the appraiser may report to the Center director whether or not such denaturant is suitable for rendering the oil unfit for use as food or for any but mechanical or manufacturing purposes.
( f ) No such oil shall be released free of duty until the appraiser shall have made a special report that it has been properly denatured.
[28 FR 14663, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 66-182, 31 FR 11416, Aug. 30, 1966; T.D. 87-75, 52 FR 20066, May 29, 1987; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51250, Dec. 21, 1988]
Record of Meetings with States 

Relating to PSD Interpretive Memo Reconsideration and Tailoring Rule

February 2010

EPA and the National Association of Clean Air Agencies (NACAA) held a series of meetings during 

February 2010 relating to state and local agencies' PSD and Title V regulations. Specifically, the 

discussions related to NACAA’s public comments that recommended applying PSD to GHGs upon the 

date the proposed GHG standards for vehicles would “take effect” and the potential need for some states 

to amend state laws to implement the provisions in the proposed Tailoring Rule. In these conversations, 

EPA and NACAA discussed how existing state regulations incorporate the phrase “subject to regulation” 

and the extent to which agencies have interpreted it and the considerations regarding how they may 

interpret in the future.

This topic was discussed generally at an initial meeting with NACAA staff at EPA Headquarters on 

February 2, 2010 and an EPA/NACAA retreat held in Washington, DC on February 4, 2010.

Specific follow-up calls were held on:

2/8 with representatives from EPA and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. 

2/9 with representatives from EPA and the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment.

2/10 with representatives from EPA, NACAA, Ohio EPA, and the Colorado Department of Public Health 

and the Environment.

2/12 with representatives from EPA, NACAA, the New York State Department of Environmental 

Conservation, the Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection, and the Sacramento Metro Air 

Quality Management District.
|  |
|--|

|  |  |
|--|--|

| ** ** |
|------------|

|   | ******Morris and Lona Cohen** 
 

**Part 1****Part 2****Part 3****Part 4**

Introduction
Reading Room Index - A   B   C   D   E    F   G- H   I    J    K   L   M   N   -O   P   Q   R   S   T   U-V   W   X   Y   Z   
Electronic Reading Room
- Alphabetical Listing- Espionage-Famous Persons-Gangster Era- Historical Interest- Unusual Phenomena-Violent CrimeFBI              File Fact Sheet FOIA Request Instructions- FOIA Request Form - Privacy Waiver and Certificate of Identity Form Privacy Act Instructions- Privacy Act Request FormDOJ              Reference GuideU.S.              DOJ FOIASearch
All of these publications are in PDF (Portable Document Format). To view them you will need to have the Adobe Acrobat Reader plug-in installed on your computer. The Reader can be downloaded at no cost from Adobe's site on the World Wide Web.   If you have difficulty accessing any material on this site because of a disability, please contact us in writing or via telephone and we will work with you to make the information available.

Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Section    202-324-5520 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Clarification of Regulatory Guide 1.21, Section C.10, "Sensitivity"

## HPPOS-122 PDR-9111210281

See the memorandum from L. K. Cohen to J. T. Sutherland dated October 5, 1977. It clarifies the provision in Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.21 that allows determination of concentrations of certain radionuclides based on measurements of other radionuclides and predetermined ratios.

Provided below are answers to specific questions raised on Section C.10 of RG 1.21 which states: "... it may be more appropriate to calculate releases of such radionuclides to those radionuclides which are routinely identified and measured. Measurements should be made periodically to establish and assure the continued validity of the ratios used. Any reported data determined by this method should be clearly identified."
        - Should the nuclides to be considered include all 10 CFR 20 Table II nuclides?  No. This statement was inserted in RG 1.21 to cover situations during routine analyses, where a particular radionuclide or radionuclides predominated a mixture or had a gamma energy spectrum which interfered with other gamma energies. Under these circumstances, it would be difficult to measure certain radionuclides which are known to be present from more detailed extensive analyses. The techniques depends upon having a data base of detailed, thorough analyses, perhaps performed with better sensitivity and resolution. For example, periodically, the licensee should make a long measurement on a sample with GeLi system. Information from these analyses would be then used to generate ratios and calculate other radionuclides unresolved in the NaI spectrum.
        - Should the nuclides to be ratio'd be based upon the isotopic inventory of a composite batch (weekly, monthly, quarterly, yearly) or single batch (preceding batch, or reference batch to be selected by licensee)?  The makeup of the composite to determine ratios depend upon the variability of the isotope mixture and ratios observed in the past data. If the mixture is stable, then quarterly composited samples may be sufficient, if not, then more extensive sampling and analyses may be necessary.
        - If a reference batch, selected by the licensee, is acceptable - what documentation requirements are necessary?  The licensee must provide documentation to demonstrate that the batch is representative of the effluent streams being analyzed. The licensee must also provide and document a series of analyses over a reasonable length of time to demonstrate the stability of the isotopic mixture.
        - Where should the ratio based sample be obtained (primary coolant, secondary systems)?  The sample should be collected from an effluent stream that assures a representative sample. It is meaningless to calculate ratios from isotopic mixtures of the primary coolant for determining airborne effluents. 

**Regulatory references:** Regulatory Guide 1.21

**Subject codes:** 7.3, 10.1

**Applicability:** Reactors

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, October 16, 2017
Exhibit B



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Annual Report) for the purposes of complying with
Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Rafael Miranda Robredo, the Chief Executive Officer and José Luis Palomo Alvarez, the Chief Financial Officer of
Endesa, S.A., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Endesa, S.A.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: October 28, 2005



By:

/S/ RAFAEL MIRANDA ROBREDOName:

Rafael Miranda RobredoTitle:

Chief Executive Officer






By:

/S/ JOSÉ LUIS PALOMO ALVAREZName:

José Luis Palomo AlvarezTitle:

Chief Financial Officer