alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-175 November 13, 2000

NRC APPROVES TRANSFER OF OPERATING LICENSES FOR

INDIAN POINT 3 AND FITZPATRICK TO ENTERGY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has approved the transfer of the operating licenses

for the Indian Point 3 and James A. FitzPatrick nuclear power plants to subsidiaries of Entergy

Corporation. Both licenses had been held by the Power Authority of the State of New York (PASNY).

The Indian Point 3 plant is located in Buchanan, New York, about 24 miles north of New York

City. The James A. FitzPatrick plant is located in the town of Scriba, about eight miles northeast of

Oswego, New York.

In May, applications were submitted to the NRC requesting approval for the license transfers.

The key issues considered by the NRC technical staff included the prospective licensees’ technical and

financial qualifications to operate the plant, and decommissioning funding assurance.

Notice of the requests for approval and opportunities for a hearing were published in the

Federal Register on June 28. The Commission received hearing requests from municipalities that

purchase power from these utilities, from labor unions, and from a public interest group. Commission

review of these requests, which include issues such as decommissioning funding, is pending.

In these cases, the technical staff’s approval becomes effective immediately. However, if the

Commission decides to grant a hearing and rules in favor of any of the petitioners, it could rescind the

license transfer approval or modify its terms.

The Entergy Corporation, through its subsidiaries, owns and operates six nuclear power plants

at five sites -- Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2; Grand Gulf, in Mississippi; River Bend Station

and Waterford 3, in Louisiana; and Pilgrim, in Massachusetts. An Entergy affiliate is also overseeing

the decommissioning of the Maine Yankee and the Millstone, Connecticut, plants.

###
Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 89 FR 20832, Mar. 25, 2024.

§ 351.502 Specificity of domestic subsidies. ( a ) *Sequential analysis.* In determining whether a subsidy is *de facto* specific, the Secretary will examine the factors contained in section 771(5A)(D)(iii) of the Act sequentially in order of their appearance. If a single factor warrants a finding of specificity, the Secretary will not undertake further analysis.
( b ) *Characteristics of a “group.”* In determining whether a subsidy is being provided to a “group” of enterprises or industries within the meaning of section 751(5A)(D) of the Act, the Secretary is not required to determine whether there are shared characteristics among the enterprises or industries that are eligible for, or actually receive, a subsidy.
( c ) *Traded goods sector.* In determining whether a subsidy is being provided to a “group” of enterprises or industries within the meaning of section 771(5A)(D) of the Act, the Secretary normally will consider enterprises that buy or sell goods internationally to comprise such a group.
( d ) *Integral linkage.* Unless the Secretary determines that two or more programs are integrally linked, the Secretary will determine the specificity of a program under section 771(5A)(D) of the Act solely on the basis of the availability and use of the particular program in question. The Secretary may find two or more programs to be integrally linked if: ( 1 ) The subsidy programs have the same purpose;
( 2 ) The subsidy programs bestow the same type of benefit;
( 3 ) The subsidy programs confer similar levels of benefits on similarly situated firms; and
( 4 ) The subsidy programs were linked at inception.
( e ) *Agricultural subsidies.* The Secretary will not regard a subsidy as being specific under section 771(5A)(D) of the Act solely because the subsidy is limited to the agricultural sector (domestic subsidy).
( f ) *Subsidies to small-and medium-sized businesses.* The Secretary will not regard a subsidy as being specific under section 771(5A)(D) of the Act solely because the subsidy is limited to small firms or small-and medium-sized firms.
( g ) *Disaster relief.* The Secretary will not regard disaster relief as being specific under section 771(5A)(D) of the Act if such relief constitutes general assistance available to anyone in the area affected by the disaster.
[63 FR 65407, Nov. 25, 1998, as amended at 85 FR 6043, Feb. 4, 2020]
### §162a. Gross salary of Library of Congress employees

Hereafter the gross salary of any position in the Library which is augmented by payment of an honorarium from other than appropriated funds under terms of section 162 of this title shall not exceed an amount, which when combined with such honorarium, will exceed the maximum salary provided in chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5.

(June 22, 1949, ch. 235, §101, 63 Stat. 226; Oct. 28, 1949, ch. 782, title XI, §1106(a), 63 Stat. 972.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"Chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5" substituted in text for "the Classification Act of 1949" on authority of section 7(b) of Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 631, section 1 of which enacted Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Amendments

1949—Act Oct. 28, 1949, substituted "Classification Act of 1949" for "Classification Act of 1923".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeals

Act Oct. 28, 1949, ch. 782, cited as a credit to this section, was repealed (subject to a savings clause) by Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, §8, 80 Stat. 632, 655.
### §5310. Certificate of salary during recess

The Clerk of the House of Representatives is authorized and directed to sign, during the recess of Congress after the first session and until the first day of the second session, the certificates for the monthly compensation of Members and Delegates in Congress, which certificate shall be in the form in use on August 15, 1876, and shall have the like force and effect as is given to the certificate of the Speaker.

(Aug. 15, 1876, ch. 287, §1, 19 Stat. 145.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 49 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-02-0174 - Litigation Report - 2002-03

Accession Number: ML022690582

Date Released: Tuesday, October 15, 2002

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML022690663 - SECY-02-0174 - Litigation Report - 2202 - 03 (11 page(s), 9/1/2002)
    - ML022680642 - California Public Utilities Commission " Petition for Review" and Orange County "Petitions for Review of Orders of the NRC." (9 page(s), 8/23/2002)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
EXHIBIT 3 

Case 9:20-cv-81063-RS Document 21-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2020 Page 1 of 2
Lookback 

Price

Name Date 

Purchased

Shares Price per 

Share

Total Date Sold Shares Price per 

Share

Total Shares 

Retained

Value 

Retained

Total 

Loss/Gain

$11.27 

Zhang, Ye 5/28/2020 2000 ($12.38) ($24,756.00) 6/11/2020 2000 $12.13 $24,260.00 

6/10/2020 1000 ($13.88) ($13,880.00) 6/24/2020 1000 $11.49 $11,490.00 

3000 ($38,636.00) 3000 $35,750.00 0 $0.00 ($2,886.00)

The GEO Group, Inc. Loss Chart 

Class Period: February 27, 2020 through June 16, 2020

Case 9:20-cv-81063-RS Document 21-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2020 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1451 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1451

   To prohibit high school and college sports gambling in all States 
   including States where such gambling was permitted prior to 1991.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2003

Mr. Osborne (for himself, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Kind, Mr. Wamp, Mr. 
    Shays, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Goode, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Bartlett of 
 Maryland, Mr. Wicker, Mr. DeMint, Mr. Gordon, Mr. Linder, Mr. Walsh, 
Mr. Latham, Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. Spratt, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. 
 Etheridge, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Ehlers, and Mr. Wilson of South Carolina) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit high school and college sports gambling in all States 
   including States where such gambling was permitted prior to 1991.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Student Athlete Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION.

     Section 3704 of title 28, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``Section'' and 
        inserting ``Except as provided in subsection (c), section''; 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c)(1) Section 3702 shall apply to a lottery, sweepstakes or 
other betting, gambling, or wagering scheme based, directly or 
indirectly, on--
                    ``(A)(i) one or more competitive games in which 
                high school or college athletes participate; or
                            ``(ii) one or more performances of high 
                        school or college athletes in competitive 
                        games; or
                    ``(B) one or more competitive games at the Summer 
                or Winter Olympics.
    ``(2) In this section--
            ``(A) the term `high school' has the meaning given the term 
        `secondary school' in section 14102 of the Elementary and 
        Secondary Education Act of 1965; and
            ``(B) the term `college' has the meaning given the term 
        `institution of higher education' in section 101 of the Higher 
        Education Act of 1965.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

     The amendments made by section 2 shall take effect on the date 
that is 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,264
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   94,175
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,062
<INVENTORY>                                     78,746
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               183,966
<PP&E>                                         183,264
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,679
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 373,981
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,222
<BONDS>                                        117,805
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                     180,237
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   373,981
<SALES>                                        877,280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               877,280
<CGS>                                          663,122
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  843,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,218
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,905
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,756
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,149
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,149
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61872-61873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23537]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Third Generation Partnership Project 2

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 14, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Third Generation 
Partnership Project 2 (``3GPP2'' has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal name of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Third 
Generation Partnership Project 2, Arlington, VA. The nature and scope 
of 3GPP2's standards development activities are: for the purposes of 
preparing, approving, and maintaining globally applicable Technical 
Specifications and Technical Reports for a 3rd Generation Mobile System 
based on the evolving ANSI-41 Core Network and the relevant radio 
access technologies to be transposed by the relevant standardization 
bodies (Organizational Partners) into

[[Page 61873]]

appropriate deliverables (e.g., standards).

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23537 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### In the Matter of the Application of Barnet Berezoff, etc.

Motion for stay granted, on condition that appellant perfect its appeal, place the case on the next calendar and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion denied, without costs. Present—Burr, Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
### §37. Proceedings for patent where boundaries contain vein or lode; application; statement including vein or lode; issuance of patent: acreage payments for vein or lode and placer claim; costs of proceedings; knowledge affecting construction of application and scope of patent

Where the same person, association, or corporation is in possession of a placer claim, and also a vein or lode included within the boundaries thereof, application shall be made for a patent for the placer claim, with the statement that it includes such vein or lode, and in such case a patent shall issue for the placer claim, subject to the provisions of sections 21, 22 to 24, 26 to 28, 29, 30, 33 to 48, 50 to 52, 71 to 76 of this title and section 661 of title 43, including such vein or lode, upon the payment of $5 per acre for such vein or lode claim, and twenty-five feet of surface on each side thereof. The remainder of the placer claim, or any placer claim not embracing any vein or lode claim, shall be paid for at the rate of $2.50 per acre, together with all costs of proceedings; and where a vein or lode, such as is described in section 23 of this title, is known to exist within the boundaries of a placer claim, an application for a patent for such placer claim which does not include an application for the vein or lode claim shall be construed as a conclusive declaration that the claimant of the placer claim has no right of possession of the vein or lode claim; but where the existence of a vein or lode in a placer claim is not known, a patent for the placer claim shall convey all valuable mineral and other deposits within the boundaries thereof.

(R.S. §2333.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 21, 22 to 24, 26 to 28, 29, 30, 33 to 48, 50 to 52, 71 to 76 of this title and section 661 of title 43, referred to in text, were in the original "this chapter", meaning chapter 6 of title 32 of the Revised Statutes, consisting of R.S. §§2318 to 2352.

#### Codification

R.S. §2333 derived from act May 10, 1872, ch. 152, §11, 17 Stat. 94.
#### Fred A. Rogalsky et al., Respondents, v. William J. Ryan et al., Appellants.

Memorandum: The offer and acceptance was a sufficient memorandum to comply with the statute. Although counsel for the parties prepared a deed without reserving possession of the house, barn and garden to the defendants and covered that part of the agreement in a separate lease, this was unnecessary as the deed itself could have been drawn to reserve defendants’ right to possession in that part of the premises for a period of five years. The fact that the lease was prepared and contained terms objectionable to either party did not affect the original offer and acceptance as that agreement contained the entire contract, and when defendants refused to execute the lease, plaintiffs had the right to fall back upon the original agreement. (Sa*nders*v. *Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co.,*144 N. Y. 209; *Newburger*v. *American Surety Co.,*242 N. Y. 134.) Reither should the relief be denied plaintiffs on the ground that the agreement lacked mutuality. Although plaintiff Rogalsky was in fact an agent, he executed the agreement as principal and was bound to perform. The judgment, however, must be modified by reserving to the defendants in the deed to be executed by them the right to retain possession of the house in which they now reside, one small barn in which to store a truck, and one acre of land for a garden, for five years from the date of the deed, rent free. The judgment must further provide that on the execution and delivery of the deed the plaintiff Cornell University shall pay to the defendants the sum of $19,000 as that is the balance of the purchase price of $21,000 as set forth in the agreement, and the complaint in this action demands specific performance only, and does not contain any demand that plaintiff Rogalsky have judgment for his broker’s commissions of $1,000. If defendants refuse to pay the $1,000 to Ragalsky he is left to his remedy at law. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiffs in an action for specific performance.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love, Vaughan and Piper, JJ. [192 Misc. 392.]
### §60e–2a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 60e–2a was editorially reclassified as section 1853 of this title.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-098 July 22, 2003

NRC RELEASES FINAL VERSION

 OF YUCCA MOUNTAIN REVIEW PLAN

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is issuing the final version of the plan it would use

to review an expected application from the Department of Energy (DOE) to construct a highlevel nuclear waste geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. 

The principal purpose of the Yucca Mountain Review Plan is to ensure the quality and

uniformity of the NRC staff’s reviews. The plan has separate sections for potential reviews of

repository safety before permanent closure, safety after permanent closure, the research and

development program to resolve safety questions, the performance confirmation program and

administrative and programmatic requirements. Each section defines how NRC will review

DOE’s compliance with NRC regulations.

A copy is available on the NRC website at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1804 . Hard copies may be

purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office,

Washington, D.C. 20402-0001; telephone: 202-512-1800.

A draft version of the plan was released in March 2002, and public comments were

invited during a 5-month public comment period that ended August 12 of last year. The staff

also conducted three public meetings in Nevada on the draft plan to solicit comments. 

Approximately 1000 comments were received. 

A Federal Register notice to be published shortly describes the comments, NRC

responses and changes to the Review Plan. 

###
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Dean M.
Leavitt, certify that:

1.  I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of U.S. Wireless Data, Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: February
23, 2004

/s/ Dean M.
Leavitt
Dean M. Leavitt
Chief Executive Officer
          (Principal Executive Officer)

---