alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:20-cv-14253-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2020 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:20-cv-14253-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2020 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:20-cv-14253-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2020 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:20-cv-14253-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2020 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:20-cv-14253-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2020 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:20-cv-14253-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2020 Page 6 of 6
### **CHAPTER 11—MINING CLAIMS ON LANDS SUBJECT TO MINERAL LEASING LAWS**

Sec.
501.
Mining claims located between July 31, 1939, and January 1, 1953.
502.
Reservation of minerals to the United States; rights of entry, disposition and removal.
503.
Reservations required by law; atomic energy materials.
504.
Power to make arrangements respecting atomic energy materials as unaffected.
505.
"Mineral leasing laws" defined.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with Spectrum Group International, Inc.'s (the “Company”) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date: May 12, 2011/s/ Paul SothName:Paul SothTitle:Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
### §287c. Compensation

(a) The Parliamentarian shall be paid at a per annum gross rate established by the Speaker but not in excess of the greater of $173,900 or the rate of pay in effect for such position under an order issued by the Speaker of the House of Representatives pursuant to the authority of section 4532 of this title.

(b) Members of the staff of the Office other than the Parliamentarian shall be paid at per annum gross rates fixed by the Parliamentarian with the approval of the Speaker or in accordance with policies approved by the Speaker but not in excess of the applicable rate of pay in effect under an order issued by the Speaker of the House of Representatives pursuant to the authority of section 4532 of this title.

(Pub. L. 95–94, title I, §115, Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 668; Pub. L. 116–94, div. E, title II, §212(b)(3)(C), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2777.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is based on section 4 of House Resolution No. 502, Ninety-fifth Congress, Apr. 20, 1977, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 95–94.

#### Prior Provisions

House Resolution No. 904, Eighty-eighth Congress, Oct. 3, 1964, provided: "That effective January 1, 1965, the salary of the Parliamentarian of the House of Representatives shall be at the gross rate of $28,500. The additional sums necessary to carry out this resolution shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the House until otherwise provided by law."

#### Amendments

2019—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–94, §212(b)(3)(C)(i), substituted "but not in excess of the greater of $173,900 or the rate of pay in effect for such position under an order issued by the Speaker of the House of Representatives pursuant to the authority of section 4532 of this title." for "but not in excess of the rate of basic pay determined from time to time under subsection (b) of section 3 of the Speaker's salary directive of June 11, 1968."

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 116–94, §212(b)(3)(C)(ii), substituted "but not in excess of the applicable rate of pay in effect under an order issued by the Speaker of the House of Representatives pursuant to the authority of section 4532 of this title" for ", but not in excess of the rate of basic pay set forth in subsection (a) of this section".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2019 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–94 effective on the later of the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2020, or the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after Dec. 20, 2019, see section 212(c) of Pub. L. 116–94, set out as a note under section 282b of this title.

#### Increases in Compensation

Increases in compensation for House officers and employees under authority of Federal Salary Act of 1967 (Pub. L. 90–206), Federal Pay Comparability Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 91–656), and Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1988 (Pub. L. 100–202), see sections 4531 and 4532 of this title, and Salary Directives of Speaker of the House, set out as notes under those sections.
### §1733. Information

#### (a) Availability of confidential information by Secretary pursuant to cooperative agreements; conditions

Trade secrets, proprietary and other confidential information shall be made available by the Secretary, pursuant to a cooperative agreement, to a State or Indian tribe upon request only if—

(1) such State or Indian tribe consents in writing to restrict the dissemination of the information to those who are directly involved in an audit or investigation under this chapter and who have a need to know;

(2) such State or tribe accepts liability for wrongful disclosure;

(3) in the case of a State, such State demonstrates that such information is essential to the conduct of an audit or investigation or to litigation under section 1734 of this title; and

(4) in the case of an Indian tribe, such tribe demonstrates that such information is essential to the conduct of an audit or investigation and waives sovereign immunity by express consent for wrongful disclosure by such tribe.

#### (b) Nonliability of United States for wrongful disclosure

The United States shall not be liable for the wrongful disclosure by any individual, State, or Indian tribe of any information provided to such individual, State, or Indian tribe pursuant to any cooperative agreement or a delegation, authorized by this chapter.

#### (c) Law governing disclosure

Whenever any individual, State, or Indian tribe has obtained possession of information pursuant to a cooperative agreement authorized by this section, or any individual or State has obtained possession of information pursuant to a delegation under section 1735 of this title, the individual shall be subject to the same provisions of law with respect to the disclosure of such information as would apply to an officer or employee of the United States or of any department or agency thereof and the State or Indian tribe shall be subject to the same provisions of law with respect to the disclosure of such information as would apply to the United States or any department or agency thereof. No State or State officer or employee who receives trade secrets, proprietary information, or other confidential information under this chapter may be required to disclose such information under State law.

(Pub. L. 97–451, title II, §203, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2458.)
### §193a. Preference right of United States to purchase coal for Army and Navy; price for coal; civil actions; jurisdiction

The United States shall, at all times, have the preference right to purchase so much of the product of any mine or mines opened upon the lands sold under the provisions of this Act, as may be necessary for the use of the Army and Navy, and at such reasonable and remunerative price as may be fixed by the President; but the producers of any coal so purchased who may be dissatisfied with the price thus fixed shall have the right to prosecute suits against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims for the recovery of any additional sum or sums they may claim as justly due upon such purchase.

(May 28, 1908, ch. 211, §2, 35 Stat. 424; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §160(a)(10), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 48; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(b)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act May 28, 1908, ch. 211, 35 Stat. 424. Sections 1, 3, and 4 of this Act related to consolidation of claims permitted and the limit of acreage, prohibition against unlawful trusts, etc., and contents of patents, respectively, and are not classified to the Code.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which comprises this chapter.

Section was formerly classified to section 453 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court".

1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted "United States Claims Court" for "Court of Claims".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
#### § 128.25 Formal entry procedures.

Formal entry, as provided for under 19 U.S.C. 1484 in parts 141, 142, and 143 (except for subpart C), of this chapter, is required for all shipments exceeding the monetary limitation for informal entry (see § 128.24) and any shipment for which the informal entry procedures may not be used (see § 128.24).

[T.D. 94-51, 59 FR 30295, June 13, 1994]
#### § 207.14 Negative petition determination.

Upon receipt by the Commission of notice from the administering authority under section 702(d) or section 732(d) of the Act that the administering authority has made a negative petition determination under section 702(c)(3) or section 732(c)(3) of the Act, the investigation begun pursuant to § 207.12 shall terminate. All persons who have received requests for information from the Director shall be notified of the termination.

[61 FR 37832, July 22, 1996]
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.727 Maintenance of records. ( a ) *General.* An importer claiming preferential tariff treatment for a good imported into the United States under § 10.723(a) of this subpart must maintain, for five years after the date of importation of the good, records and documents necessary to demonstrate that the good qualifies as an originating good, including records and documents associated with: ( 1 ) The purchase of, cost of, value of, and payment for, the good;
( 2 ) Where appropriate, the purchase of, cost of, value of, and payment for, all materials, including recovered goods and indirect materials, used in the production of the good; and
( 3 ) Where appropriate, the production of the good in the form in which the good was exported.
( b ) *Applicability of other recordkeeping requirements.* The records and documents referred to in paragraph (a) of this section are in addition to any other records that the importer is required to prepare, maintain, or make available to CBP under part 163 of this chapter.
( c ) *Method of maintenance.* The records and documents referred to in paragraph (a) of this section must be maintained by importers as provided in § 163.5 of this chapter.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of OMNI Energy Services Corp. of our report dated March 27, 2003,
with respect to the 2002 consolidated financial statements of OMNI Energy
Services Corp. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     o    Form S-8 No. 333-110198 (OMNI Energy Services Corp. Stock Incentive
          Plan)

     o    Form S-8 No. 333-49409 (OMNI Energy Services Corp. Stock Incentive
          Plan and Stock Option Agreements with Certain Employees)

     o    Form S-8 No. 333-80973 (OMNI Energy Services Corp. 1999 Stock Option
          Plan and Stock Incentive Plan)

     o    Form S-8 No. 333-35816 (OMNI Energy Services Corp. 1999 Stock Option
          Plan)

     o    Form S-3 No. 333-69436 (OMNI Energy Services Corp. Registration
          Statement)

                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New Orleans, Louisiana
April 18, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                             390
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   413
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     653
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              460
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      8,000
<COMMON>                                         4,935
<OTHER-SE>                                         600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       653
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,407
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,407)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,407)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Joe Earl RHONE, III, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 00-50056.

D.C. No. CR-99-00518-WDK-04.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2002*.

Decided May 22, 2002.

Before LAY**, CANBY and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Donald P. Lay, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM***

Joe Earl Rhone III appeals his 171-month sentence following his conviction for conspiracy to commit armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113, and brandishing a firearm during the robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Following an explicit retroactive amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines, Defendant was resentenced to 130 months in prison.

Rhone’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that there are no arguable issues for review and seeking to withdraw as counsel of record. We have independently reviewed the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and find no issues for review. Accordingly, we GRANT the motion to withdraw as counsel and AFFIRM the conviction.

***

 phis disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. III-03-006 February 25, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

PRELIMINARY SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINED FOR 

REACTOR HEAD DAMAGE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued its preliminary finding that performance

deficiencies at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant which led to the cracking of the control rod drive

tubes and the resulting corrosion damage to the reactor vessel head were of “high safety significance.” 

The plant, which has been shut down since February of last year to inspect the reactor vessel

head, and entered an extended outage upon the discovery of head corrosion, is operated by FirstEnergy

Nuclear Operating Co. It is located near Oak Harbor, Ohio.

Under its safety significance determination process, NRC officials classify inspection findings

at nuclear power plants as being one of four colors which delineate increasing levels of safety

significance, beginning with "green" and progressing to "white," "yellow" or "red." A "red" category

indicates high safety significance.

Utility inspections after the reactor was shut down found evidence of cracks in tubes which

pass through the top of the reactor vessel. During repairs to one of the tubes, plant workers found a

cavity in the reactor vessel head next to the tube which was later determined to have been caused by

boric acid corrosion to a portion of the steel head.

Under the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process, a "red" finding would result in strong actions

by the NRC to improve plant performance, including development of a performance improvement plan

by the utility and follow-up NRC inspections.

In the case of Davis-Besse, however, the NRC implemented its procedure for plants in

extended shutdown with performance problems and established a special NRC Oversight Panel to

coordinate the agency’s response to the performance problems which led to the reactor vessel head

damage. The Oversight Panel has established a list of extensive actions to be taken by the utility to

demonstrate that plant safety systems will perform as designed and that the plant’s safety culture and

management problems have been addressed. The NRC is performing extensive inspections to verify

adequate implementation of these actions. The Davis-Besse plant may not resume operations until the

NRC is assured that it can operate safely.
The utility has 10 days to respond to the NRC’s preliminary assessment. It may ask for a

regulatory conference to discuss the finding or it may submit its response in writing.

The NRC documents reviewing its preliminary assessment of the safety significance will be

available on the NRC’s web site: http://www.nrc.gov - select "Davis-Besse" from the key issues menu. 

The documents will be posted on the "News and Correspondence" page.

# # #
November 8, 2004

 

 

Global Industries, Ltd.

8000 Global Drive

Carlyss, Louisiana 70665

 

We have made a review, in accordance with standards of thePublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) of the unaudited interim financial information of Global Industries, Ltd. and subsidiaries for the periods endedMarch 31, 2004 and 2003, June 30, 2004 and 2003, and September 30, 2004 and 2003, as indicated in our reports datedMay 7, 2004 and August 6, 2004, and November 8, 2004, respectively; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our reports referred to above, which are included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarters endedMarch 31, 2004 and September 30, 2004, are incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-58048, 33-89778, and 333-69949 of Form S-8 and in Registration No. 333-86325 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned reports, pursuant toRule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, are not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

 

/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Houston, Texas
#### § 210.19 Intervention.

Any person desiring to intervene in an investigation or a related proceeding under this part shall make a written motion after institution of the investigation or related proceeding. The motion shall have attached to it a certificate showing that the motion has been served upon each party to the investigation or related proceeding in the manner described in § 201.16(b) of this chapter. Any party may file a response to the motion in accordance with § 210.15(c) of this part, provided that the response is accompanied by a certificate confirming that the response was served on the proposed intervenor and all other parties. The Commission, or the administrative law judge by initial determination, may grant the motion to the extent and upon such terms as may be proper under the circumstances.

[59 FR 39039, Aug. 1, 1994, as amended at 83 FR 21160, May 8, 2018]