alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §541c. Lands where coal deposits have been reserved to the United States

The entryman or owner of any land or the assignee of rights therein, including lands granted to States, with respect to which the coal deposits have been reserved to the United States pursuant to the provisions of section 81 of this title or sections 83 to 85 of this title, excepting lands embraced within a coal prospecting permit or lease, upon the discovery of valuable source material in lignite situated within such entered, granted, or patented lands, who, except for the reservation of coal to the United States would have the right to mine and remove such source material, shall have the exclusive right to mine, remove, and dispose of lignite containing such source material and lignite necessary to be stripped or mined in the recovery of such material, subject to the reporting and payment requirements of section 541 of this title, and subject to the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 [42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.], upon filing in the land office designated in section 541 of this title, an adequate description sufficient to identify the land containing such lignite.

(Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 795, §4, 69 Stat. 680.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Atomic Energy Act of 1954, referred to in text, is act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, as added by act Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 919, which is classified principally to chapter 23 (§2011 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2011 of Title 42 and Tables.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# AGENCY:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Health and Human Services gives notice of a decision to evaluate a petition to designate a class of employees at the Iowa Ordnance Plant, also known as the Iowa Army Ammunition Plant, in Burlington, Iowa to be included in the Special Exposure Cohort under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. The initial proposed definition for the class being evaluated, subject to revision as warranted by the evaluation, is as follows:

*Facility:*                         Iowa Ordnance Plant, Burlington, Iowa.                    

*Locations:*                         Line 1 (which includes Yard C, Yard G, Yard L, Firing Site Area, Burning Field “B”, and Storage Sites for Pits and Weapons including Buildings 73 and 77).                    

*Job Titles and/or Job Duties:*                         All Technicians (Laboratory, Health Physics, Chemical, X-ray, etc.), Production Personnel (hourly and salaried), Engineers, Inspectors, Safety Personnel, Physical Security Personnel, and Maintenance Persons. Period of Employment: 1947-1974.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Larry Elliott, Director, Office of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *OCAS@CDC.GOV.*

Dated: October 18, 2004.

James D. Seligman,

Associate Director for Program Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 04-23814  Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-M
Civil Action No. 20-cv-23230-CMA s/ Johanna Borges Aug 4, 2020

Case 1:20-cv-23230-CMA Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2020 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the period ended June 30, 2005 of MPW Industrial Services Group, Inc. (the Issuer) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on this date hereof. I, Monte R. Black, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: October 4, 2005



/s/ Monte R. BlackMonte R. BlackChairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                



                       REPORT ON SCHEDULE
                                

The Board of Directors
Delta Mills, Inc.

Under date of August 14, 1998, we reported on the consolidated
balance sheets of Delta Mills, Inc. as of June 27, 1998 and June
28, 1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended June 27, 1998, as contained in the 1998
annual report on form 10-K.  In connection with our audit of the
aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited
the related consolidated financial statement schedule for each of
the years in the three-year period ended June 27, 1998, as listed
on in Item 14(d) of Form 10-K.  This financial statement schedule
is the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial
statement schedule based on our audit.

In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.

                                        /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Greenville, South Carolina                             KPMG Peat
Marwick LLP
August 14, 1998
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Adjudication 

November 30,2016 

VIA U.S. MAIL and FAX 

Casey E. Gardner, Esq. 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

800 Independence Ave., S.W, Rm 323 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Todd Emerson, Esq. 

Sky West Airlines 

444 S. River Road 

St. George, UT 84790 

Re: SkyWestAirlines, Inc., FDMS Nos. FAA-2013-0292; FAA-2012-0777; FAA-2012-

0868; FAA-2012-0869; FAA-2012-0872; FAA-2012-0873; FAA-2012-0874; 

F AA-2012-0904; FAA-2013-0617; FAA-2013-0619 

Dear Ms. Gardner and Mr. Emerson: 

On November 29,2016, you filed a sixth joint motion to hold decisions in abeyance pending the 

outcome of settlement negotiations. You once again explained that "the parties are diligently 

pursuing settlement of these cases" through "continuing and ongoing" discussions. As a result, 

you requested that the Administrator not issue any decisions regarding the referenced cases on 

appeal pending the outcome of these negotiations and further motion by the parties. 

-In light of this latest motion, the Administrator will not issue any decisions in these cases for 60 

calendar days from the date of this letter, or until negotiations are concluded, whichever comes 

first. 

Please continue to update the Hearing Docket Clerk regarding any developments. 

Anthony N. Palladino 

Director and Administrative Judge
Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 89 FR 20832, Mar. 25, 2024.

§ 351.516 Price preferences for inputs used in the production of goods for export. ( a ) *Benefit* — ( 1 ) *In general.* In the case of a program involving the provision by governments or their agencies, either directly or indirectly through government-mandated schemes, of imported or domestic products or services for use in the production of exported goods, a benefit exists to the extent that the Secretary determines that the terms or conditions on which the products or services are provided are more favorable than the terms or conditions applicable to the provision of like or directly competitive products or services for use in the production of goods for domestic consumption unless, in the case of products, such terms or conditions are not more favorable than those commercially available on world markets to exporters.
( 2 ) *Amount of benefit.* In the case of products provided under such schemes, the Secretary will determine the amount of the benefit by comparing the price of products used in the production of exported goods to the commercially available world market price of such products, inclusive of delivery charges.
( 3 ) *Commercially available.* For purposes of paragraph (a)(2) of this section, *commercially available* means that the choice between domestic and imported products is unrestricted and depends only on commercial considerations.
( b ) *Time of receipt of benefit.* In the case of a benefit described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the Secretary normally will consider the benefit to have been received as of the date on which the firm paid, or in the absence of payment was due to pay, for the product.
( c ) *Allocation of benefit to a particular time period.* Normally, the Secretary will allocate (expense) benefits described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section to the year in which the benefit is considered to have been received under paragraph (b) of this section.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 240 (Friday, December 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 64371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27268]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

    The National Science Board's Awards and Facilities Committee, 
pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science 
Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in 
the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of the scheduling 
of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board 
business, as follows:

TIME AND DATE:  Wednesday, December 19, 2018, from 1:00-2:00 p.m. EST.

PLACE:  This meeting will be held by teleconference at the National 
Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Committee Chair's opening remarks; 
discussion of options for proceeding with plans for Antarctic 
Infrastructure Modernization for Science (AIMS).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Elise Lipkowitz, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#56333a3f263d39213f1638253078313920"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a7c2cbced7ccc8d0cee7c9d4c189c0c8d1">[email protected]</span></a>, telephone: (703) 292-7000. 
Meeting information and updates may be found at http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/meetings/notices.jsp#sunshine. Please refer to the National Science 
Board website www.nsf.gov/nsb for general information.

Chris Blair,
Executive Assistant to the NSB Office.
[FR Doc. 2018-27268 Filed 12-12-18; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Promissory Note dated 7/14/2002



 EXHIBIT 10.15 
  
 JOSE LIBERMAN 
  
 PROMISSORY NOTE 
  
 
	 $4,432.46
 	 	 Los Angeles, California
 
	  	 	 July 14, 2002
 

 
  
 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, JOSE LIBERMAN, an individual
(“Payor”), hereby promises to pay to the order of LBI MEDIA, INC., a California corporation (“Payee”) the principal amount of FOUR THOUSAND, FOUR HUNDRED AND THIRTY TWO DOLLARS AND FORTY SIX CENTS ($4,432.46),
together with interest on the unpaid balance thereof from the date hereof in the amounts and at the times specified below until such principal amount shall be paid (whether at maturity, by prepayment, upon demand, by acceleration or otherwise).

  
 The Payor shall repay the unpaid principal balance of this Note by no later than July 14, 2009. The unpaid
principal under this Note shall bear interest until due and payable at a rate equal to the Alternative Federal Short-Term Rate published by the Internal Revenue Service for the month in which such advance was made, per annum (calculated on the basis
of a 360-day year and the actual number of days elapsed), such interest shall be payable by no later than July 14, 2009. This Note shall not be construed to require payment of any interest in excess of the maximum amount permitted by law.

  
 All payments of principal and interest in respect of this Note shall be made in lawful money of the United States
of America and same day funds to Payee at such place as shall be designated in writing for such purpose by Payee. 
  
 This Note may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without penalty or premium. 
  
 THIS NOTE
SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND SHALL BE CONSTRUED AND ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE INTERNAL LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WITHOUT REGARD TO CONFLICTS OF LAWS PRINCIPLES. 

 
 1 








  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Payor has executed and delivered this Note as of the day
and year and at the place first above written. 
  
 
	 
	  	 	 /s/  Jose Liberman        
 

	  	 	 Jose Liberman
 

 
  
 Pay to the Order of 
  
 
 
 dated as of
                                        
         
  
  
 LBI MEDIA, INC. 

 
 
	 
	 By:
 	 	 /s/  Lenard Liberman        
 

	  	 	       Name:  Lenard Liberman
       Title:  Executive Vice President
 

 

 
 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Benito CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 97-50590.

D.C. No. CR-93-00093-GLT-1.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 20, 2002.

Before TROTT, FERNANDEZ, and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Juan Benito Castro was convicted and sentenced for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute it, and for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute it. *See*21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. He appealed, and we affirmed. *See United States v. Castro,*No. 97-50590, 2000 WL 898734 (9th Cir. July 6, 2000) (unpublished disposition) *(Castro I).*However, the Supreme Court vacated our disposition and remanded for further consideration1 in light of its holding in *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

With the magnificent hindsight conferred upon us by *Apprendi,*we agree with Castro and the government that the district court plainly erred when it sentenced Castro to life imprisonment. The failure to submit the issue of drug quantity to the jury made it improper to rely upon quantity when the maximum possible statutory sentence was determined. *See United States v. Nordby,*225 F.3d 1053, 1058-59 (9th Cir.2000); *see also Apprendi,*530 U.S. at 490, 120 S.Ct. at 2362-63. The district court should, therefore, have looked to 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C), rather than to 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) when it determined the maximum sentence that it *554could impose upon Castro.2

In the interest of clarity, we point out that the district court did not err when it considered the effect of Castro’s prior drug convictions, even though that issue was not submitted to the jury. *See Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 226-27, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 1222, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998); *United States v. Castillo-Rivera,*244 F.3d 1020, 1024-25 (9th Cir.2001). Consideration of his prior drug felony convictions is as applicable in the context of § 841(b)(1)(C) as it was in the context of § 841(b)(1)(A).

Therefore, we reinstate our disposition in *Castro I,*with the exception of the ultimate affirmance of Castro’s sentence. We vacate Castro’s sentence and remand to the district court for further proceedings. The district court shall not revisit the sentencing issue that we decided in paragraph (6) of *Castro I.*However, it may consider any other sentencing issues.

VACATED and REMANDED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. *Castro v. United States,*531 U.S. 1063, 121 S.Ct. 751, 148 L.Ed.2d 654 (2001) (mem.).

2

. Nothing in *Apprendi,*however, renders § 841 unconstitutional in whole or in part. *See United States v. Carranza,*289 F.3d 634 (9th Cir.2002); *United States v. Buckland,*277 F.3d 1173, 1176 (9th Cir.2002) (en banc).
[4910-13-PI

14CFR Part 39 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AT10N Federal Aviation Administration



# OfPJ+2. IDocket No. FAA-2010-*****; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-332-AD] RIN 2120-AA64 Ainvorthiness Directives; BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited Model BAe 146 an Avro 146-RJ Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Nolice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: We propose to adopt anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe prOOuc listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness

condition as:

joint attachment fitting atwing rib 2, which could lead to reduced structural The unsafe condition is stress corrosion failures inthe region ofthe rear spar root ROUTI1tG SY"!IOL 

### AN/'< - 

## ii ..., 

# iJ l--/ 10 AQ>IT'IfG SnlllOl

## A"1"l - 10 (



# • • 

# • 

# • • • • ** * [F)uelleaks and failed fasteners [9ave been reported] inthe region of the rear spar rootjoint attachment fitting atwing rib 2. '"

## ** and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the uns information (MeAl) originated byan aviation authority ofanother country to identify

integrity ofthe wing, and consequent reduced controllability ofthe airplane. The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described inthe MeAL DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by [INSERT DATE 45 FAA Form 1360·14.1 (6-89) OFFICIAL FILE COPY {" u.s. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1f9S . 7~9·211
___________________

SECY NOTE: THIS SRM AND SECY-97-194 WILL BE MADE PUBLICLY

AVAILABLE 5 WORKING DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS

SRM.

October 10, 1997

MEMORANDUM TO: L. Joseph Callan

Executive Director for Operations

FROM: John C. Hoyle /s/

SUBJECT: STAFF REQUIREMENTS - SECY-97-194 - MEMORANDUM

OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE NUCLEAR

REGULATORY COMMISSION AND THE DEPARTMENT OF

ENERGY ON COOPERATION REGARDING THE GASEOUS

DIFFUSION PLANTS

This is to advise you that the Commission has not objected to the

proposed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) subject to the

following comments.

1. On page 1, the background section should be expanded to

briefly explain the lease agreement between DOE and USEC

since the term "leased space" is used subsequently without

explanation. Also, in paragraph 1, line 15, replace 'the

U.S. Enrichment Corporation' with 'USEC.'

2. On page 2, paragraph 1, line 5, replace 'after NRC assumes'

with 'now that NRC has assumed.' Consider inserting a new

paragraph D as follows: 'NRC re-certification of the GDPs

is in part conditioned upon USEC compliance with all terms

and conditions of the NRC certificate of compliance.'

Change 'D' to 'E' in the next paragraph.

3. On page 3, item 3, line 1, insert 'the following: a.' after

'notify DOE of' and capitalize the 's' in 'substantial.'

Insert the following as items 3.b. and 3.c.:

b. Substantial changes to the conditions or terms of

the NRC certificate of compliance issued to USEC.

c. Substantial changes to USEC's compliance with the

conditions or terms of the certificate of

compliance issued to USEC.
-2-

Insert a new item 4 as follows: 'NRC will consult with DOE

on health, safety and environmental issues at the GDPs when

preparing the required annual report to Congress on the

GDPs.' Renumber items 4, 5, and 6 as 5, 6, and 7

respectively.

4. On page 4, paragraph C.1., line 2, delete the 'a' after

'there is.' In line 3, add an 's' to 'feature.' At the end

of paragraph C.2., add: 'If the NRC identifies situations

with immediate safety, safeguards, or security significance,

it will immediately communicate this information to USEC and

the DOE Site Manager.

5. On page 5, paragraph V.B., line 3, remove the comma after

'Chief.' Insert a new item, V.C. as follows: 'If the issue

can not be resolved at the staff level, the NRC and DOE

agree to refer the matter within 30 days to the Assistant

Manager for Enrichment Facilities, Oak Ridge Operations

Office, DOE and the Director, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety

and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and

Safeguards, NRC.'

The staff should inform the Commission if, as a result of

experience, it determines that the MOU needs revision.

cc: Chairman Jackson

Commissioner Dicus

Commissioner Diaz

Commissioner McGaffigan

OGC

CIO

CFO

OCA

OIG

Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ACNW, ASLBP (via E-Mail)

PDR

DCS
PUBLIC LAW 106–328—OCT. 19, 2000 114 STAT. 1295

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4169:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

July 11, 12, considered and passed House.

Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–328

106th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2000 Vassar

Street in Reno, Nevada, as the ‘‘Barbara F. Vucanovich Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

2000 Vassar Street in Reno, Nevada, shall be known and designated

as the ‘‘Barbara F. Vucanovich Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Barbara

F. Vucanovich Post Office Building’’.

Approved October 19, 2000.

Oct. 19, 2000

[H.R. 4169]