alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-02-042 October 2, 2002

CONTACT: Ken Clark E-mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 404 562-4417

Cell 404 317-7291

NRC REGION IV OFFICE IN ARLINGTON, TEXAS IMPLEMENTS

HURRICANE RESPONSE PROCEDURE FOR AREA NUCLEAR PLANTS

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Region IV office in Arlington, Texas has implemented its

hurricane response procedure for monitoring of Hurricane Lili at the Waterford and River Bend

commercial nuclear power plants near New Orleans and Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and the South Texas

Project plant near Bay City, Texas.

 The office will activate its Incident Response Center at 4:00 p.m. (CDT) today. NRC inspectors

from the Region IV office are currently at each of the three plant sites reviewing preparations for the

impending severe weather. NRC regional administrator Ellis Merschoff said the agency will dispatch

an NRC liaison to the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Region 6 office in Denton, Texas, on

Thursday morning and will maintain frequent communications with the states of Louisiana and Texas

as needed. 

 Merschoff said that, while none of the plant sites are currently projected to be directly in the path of

hurricane force winds, there is an increased concern for the possibility of damage from tornados, wind

damage to facilities offsite, and flooding of evacuation routes.

 Lili is expected to make landfall in central Louisiana as a Category 4 hurricane sometime Thursday

afternoon. 

###
### §541e. Definitions

As used in this chapter "mineral leasing laws" shall mean the Act of October 20, 1914 (38 Stat. 741); the Act of February 25, 1920 (41 Stat. 437) [30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.]; the Act of April 17, 1926 (44 Stat. 301) [30 U.S.C. 271 et seq.]; the Act of February 7, 1927 (44 Stat. 1057) [30 U.S.C. 281 et seq.]; and all Acts heretofore or hereafter enacted which are amendatory of or supplementary to any of the foregoing Acts; "Leasing Act minerals" shall mean all minerals which, upon August 11, 1955, are provided in the mineral leasing laws to be disposed of thereunder; "lignite" shall mean coal classified as ASTM designation: D 388–38, according to the standards established in the American Society for Testing Materials on Coal and Coke under standard specifications for Classification of Coals by Rank, contained in public-land deposits considered as valuable under the coal-land classification standards established by the Secretary of the Interior and prescribed in section 30, Code of Federal Regulations, part 201; and "source material" shall mean uranium, thorium, or any other material which is determined by the Atomic Energy Commission pursuant to the provisions of section 2091 of title 42 to be source material.

(Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 795, §6, 69 Stat. 680.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of October 20, 1914, referred to in text, is act Oct. 20, 1914, ch. 330, 38 Stat. 741, known as the Alaska Coal Lands Act, which was repealed by Pub. L. 86–252, §1, Sept. 9, 1959, 73 Stat. 490. The subject matter of this Act is generally covered by subchapters I to VII (§181 et seq.) of chapter 3A of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code prior to repeal, see Tables.

Act of February 25, 1920, referred to in text, is act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, as amended, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which is classified generally to chapter 3A (§181 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 181 of this title and Tables.

Act of April 17, 1926, referred to in text, is act Apr. 17, 1926, ch. 158, 44 Stat. 301, which is classified generally to subchapter VIII (§271 et seq.) of chapter 3A of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

Act of February 7, 1927, referred to in text, is act Feb. 7, 1927, ch. 66, 44 Stat. 1057, which enacted subchapter IX (§281 et seq.) of chapter 3A of this title, amended sections 181 and 193 of this title, and repealed subchapter VII (§141 et seq.) of chapter 3 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Atomic Energy Commission abolished and functions transferred by sections 5814 and 5841 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. See, also, Transfer of Functions notes set out under those sections.
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-68 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 21

 

 

SUBSIDIARIES

 

Cayuga Energy, Inc. - Incorporated in the State of Delaware.

Connecticut Energy Corporation - Incorporated in the State of      Connecticut.

Energy East Enterprises, Inc. - Incorporated in the State of Maine.

Energy East Management Corporation - Incorporated in the State of      Delaware.

Energy East Solutions, Inc. - Incorporated in the State of Delaware.

Energy East Telecommunications, Inc. - Incorporated in the State of 

     Delaware.

New York State Electric & Gas Corporation - Incorporated in the State      of New York.

NYSEG Solutions, Inc. - Incorporated in the State of New York.

The Southern Connecticut Gas Company - Incorporated in the State of      Connecticut.

XENERGY Enterprises, Inc. - Incorporated in the State of Delaware.

XENERGY, Inc. - Incorporated in the State of Massachusetts.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-02-056 October 7, 2002

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC OVERSIGHT PANEL TO HOLD TWO MEETINGS ON DAVIS-BESSE REACTOR

VESSEL HEAD DAMAGE IN OAK HARBOR, OH

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold two meetings on Wednesday, October

16, to review the status and adequacy of recent activities at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station

as a result of the corrosion damage to the reactor vessel head. The plant, which has been shut down

since February 16, is operated by FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company.

Both meetings will be at the Oak Harbor High School Auditorium, 11661 West State Route

163, in Oak Harbor.

The first meeting will begin at 2 p.m. (EDT), when the NRC oversight panel, set up to

coordinate the agency’s activities associated with the corrosion damage to the reactor vessel head,

will meet with utility officials to discuss the status of repairs at the plant and upcoming activities.

The public is invited to observe the business portion of the meeting and will have an opportunity to

make comments and ask questions of the NRC staff before the meeting is adjourned.

The second meeting will begin at 7 p.m. (EDT) to update the public on NRC’s activities

related to the reactor vessel head degradation and will provide a summary of the earlier meeting.

The public will be invited to ask questions and make comments. 

Transcripts of both meetings will be posted on the NRC’s web site.

The NRC oversight panel, created on April 29, includes NRC management and staff from its

Region III office in Lisle, Illinois, the NRC Headquarters office in Rockville, Maryland, and the

NRC Resident Inspector Office at the Davis-Besse site.

Documents on the Davis-Besse corrosion issue, including meeting transcripts and further

details on NRC's oversight panel activities, are posted on the NRC's web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/vessel-head-degradation.html.

# # # # #
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

 AIR AND RADIATION

July 2, 2015

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Files on CD for EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0827-DRAFT-0377

FROM: Christine Brunner

Assessment and Standards Division

Office of Transportation and Air Quality

TO: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and 

Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles - Phase 2 - Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0827

The enclosed CD contains the following files associated with docket item EPA-HQ-OAR-201-0827-

DRAFT-0377. 

upstream_automator_v9.py

upstream_automator_v9MY.py

Thumbs.db

There are no restrictions on any of these files.
**(a)  EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-47122 and 333-44260), FormS-8/A (Nos. 33-52478 and 33-80952) and Form S-4 (Nos. 333-36387 and 333-61221)of Building Materials Holding Corporation of our report dated March 12, 2004relating to the financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report toShareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We also consent to the incorporation byreference of our report dated March 12, 2004 relating to the financialstatement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

 
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |
|                           |
| San Francisco, California      |
| March 15, 2004                 |

 

1

----
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, DBA VIVATO 

TECHNOLOGIES,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

D-LINK SYSTEMS, INC., BELKIN 

INTERNATIONAL, INC., NEWO CORPORATION, 

ARUBA NETWORKS, INC., NETGEAR, INC., 

RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC., UBIQUITI INC., AKA 

UBIQUITINETWORKS, INC., ARUBA NETWORKS 

LLC,

Defendants

ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, ASUSTEK 

COMPUTER, INC., CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., 

EXTREME NETWORKS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________ 

2022-1785, 2022-1787, 2022-1789, 2022-1790, 2022-1791, 

2022-1792

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Central District of California in Nos. 2:17-cv-02948-AGJCG, 2:17-cv-02951-AG-JCG, 2:17-cv-02953-AG-JCG, 8:17-

cv-00596-DOC-JDE, Judge David O. Carter.

______________________ 

Case: 22-1785 Document: 47 Page: 1 Filed: 05/18/2023
2 XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. D-LINK SYSTEMS, INC. 

Decided: May 18, 2023 

______________________ 

MARC A. FENSTER, Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles, 

CA, for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MINNA 

CHAN, BRIAN DAVID LEDAHL, REZA MIRZAIE, JAMES 

PICKENS. 

 JONATHAN K. WALDROP, Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, 

Redwood Shores, CA, for defendants-appellees ASUS Computer International, Asustek Computer, Inc. Also represented by MARCUS BARBER, JOHN DOWNING. 

 SARAH E. PIEPMEIER, Perkins Coie LLP, San Francisco, 

CA, for defendant-appellee Cisco Systems, Inc. Also represented by RYAN BRODIE HAWKINS, San Diego, CA.

 DANIEL W. RICHARDS, Ropes & Gray LLP, East Palo 

Alto, CA, for defendant-appellee Extreme Networks, Inc. 

Also represented by ANDREW N. THOMASES. 

______________________ 

Before PROST, REYNA, and STARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. 

XR Communications, LLC dba Vivato Technologies 

(“Vivato”) appeals a judgment of the U.S. District Court for 

the Central District of California (“C.D. Cal. District 

Court”) holding claims 1–9 and 12 of U.S. Patent 

No. 6,611,231 invalid as indefinite. The C.D. Cal. District 

Court based its judgment on the collateral-estoppel effect 

of a judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Northern 

District of California (“N.D. Cal. District Court”)—the latter of which is the subject of companion appeals Nos. 

22-1125 and 22-1141 (as consolidated, the “companion appeal”).

Case: 22-1785 Document: 47 Page: 2 Filed: 05/18/2023
XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. D-LINK SYSTEMS, INC. 3

Today we issued an opinion and judgment in the companion appeal affirming the N.D. Cal. District Court’s judgment. There is no dispute that our affirmance in the 

companion appeal compels affirming in this appeal. Accordingly, having affirmed in the companion appeal, we 

likewise affirm in this appeal.

AFFIRMED

Case: 22-1785 Document: 47 Page: 3 Filed: 05/18/2023
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1


                           OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.
                             A LOUISIANA CORPORATION
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, James C. Eckert, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K/A/3 of
OMNI Energy Services Corp., a Louisiana corporation (the "registrant");

    2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

    3. The registrant's other certifying officers and I, are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

        a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
    material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
    particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
    prepared;

        b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
    and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
    annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

        c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
    evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

    4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

        a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
    controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
    process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
    registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

        b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
    employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
    and

    5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

       /s/ JAMES C. ECKERT
       ----------------------------------------------------------------
       James C. Eckert
       Chief Executive Officer

Date: September 14, 2004
NRC NEWS U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-068 December 6, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC ISSUES CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER TO EASTON, PA., MEDICAL FIRM

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Action Letter to an Easton, Pa.,

medical company that provides nuclear medicine services. The letter confirms the companyís

agreement to halt all NRC-licensed activities until it takes several actions to adhere to agency

regulations.

 In the letter to Advanced Medical Imaging and Nuclear Services, the NRC states that the

agencyís Region I office conducted an initial inspection of the firmís facility at 3729 Easton-Nazareth

Highway in Easton on November 30. The aim of the inspection was to review activities authorized by

an NRC license issued to the company on February 16. During the inspection, the NRC determined

that since June, the firm had been conducting activities without an Authorized User (of nuclear

materials) or Radiation Safety Officer, as required by its NRC license.

 Advanced Medical Imaging and Nuclear Services agreed during a telephone call with NRC staff

on December 3 to take the following actions in response: it will immediately place all NRC-licensed

nuclear materials in its possession in secure storage and cease all licensed activities until it has hired an

NRC-approved Authorized User and Radiation Safety Officer; it will submit a license amendment

request that will include changes necessary to bring the program into full compliance with licensing

commitments and regulations; and its new Radiation Safety Officer will submit to the NRC, within 30

days, a report on the status of the program.

 ###
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Dean M.
Leavitt, certify that:

1.  I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of U.S. Wireless Data, Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The
registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors:

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March
14, 2005

/s/ Dean M.
Leavitt
Dean M. Leavitt
Chairman of the Board
       (Former Chief Executive Officer
       and acting Principal Executive Officer)

---
#### § 207.108 Preliminary conference.

As soon as practicable after the response to the charging letter is filed, the administrative law judge shall direct counsel or other representatives for the parties to meet with him or her at a preliminary conference, unless the administrative law judge determines that such a conference is not necessary. At the conference, the administrative law judge shall consider the issuance of such orders as the administrative law judge deems necessary for the conduct of the proceedings. Such orders may include, as appropriate under these regulations, the establishment of a discovery schedule or the issuance of an order, if requested, to provide for maintaining the confidentiality of the proceedings pursuant to § 207.105(b) of this subpart.
|   | 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|

| 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: June 7, 2010 | By: /s/ Fred T. Grant, Jr. |   |
|---------------------|----------------------------|--------|

|   | Fred T. Grant, Jr. |
|--------|--------------------|

|   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1490 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1490

  To repeal the per-State limitation applicable to grants made by the 
 National Endowment for the Arts from funds made available for fiscal 
                               year 2003.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 27, 2003

  Mr. Nadler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the per-State limitation applicable to grants made by the 
 National Endowment for the Arts from funds made available for fiscal 
                               year 2003.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SEC. 1. REPEALER.

     Section 311(d) of the Department of the Interior and Related 
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2003 (Pub. L. 108-7, div. F) is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraph (2), and
            (2) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs 
        (2) and (3), respectively.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

     This Act and the amendments made by section 1 shall take effect on 
October 1, 2002.
                                 <all>
```