alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1466. Civil forfeitures

#### (a) In general

Any vessel subject to the provisions of sections 1464 and 1465 of this title, including its gear, furniture, appurtenances, stores, and cargo, which is used, in any manner, in connection with or as a result of the commission of any act prohibited by section 1461 of this title and any hard mineral resource which is recovered, processed, or retained, in any manner, in connection with or as a result of the commission of any such act, shall be subject to forfeiture to the United States. All or part of such vessel, and all such hard mineral resources, may be forfeited to the United States pursuant to a civil proceeding under this section. All provisions of law relating to the seizure, judicial forfeiture, and condemnation of a vessel or cargo for violation of the customs laws, and the disposition of the vessel, cargo, or proceeds from the sale thereof and the remission or mitigation of such forfeitures shall apply to seizures and forfeitures incurred or alleged to have been incurred under the provisions of this section insofar as such provisions of law are applicable and not inconsistent with this chapter.

#### (b) Jurisdiction of courts

Any district court of the United States which has jurisdiction under section 1467 of this title shall have jurisdiction, upon application by the Attorney General on behalf of the United States, to order any forfeiture authorized under subsection (a) and any action provided for under subsection (d).

#### (c) Judgment

If a judgment is entered for the United States in a civil forfeiture proceeding under this section, the Attorney General may seize any property or other interest declared forfeited to the United States which has not previously been seized pursuant to this chapter or for which security has not previously been obtained under subsection (d).

#### (d) Procedure

Any officer authorized to serve any process in rem which is issued by a court having jurisdiction under section 1467 of this title shall stay the execution of such process, or discharge any property seized pursuant to such process, upon the receipt of a satisfactory bond or other security from any person subject to section 1461 of this title claiming such property. Such bond or other security shall be conditioned upon such person (1) delivering such property to the appropriate court upon order thereof, without any impairment of its value; or (2) paying the monetary value of such property pursuant to any order of such court. Judgment shall be recoverable on such bond or other security against both the principal and any sureties in the event that any condition thereof is breached, as determined by such court.

#### (e) Rebuttable presumption

For purposes of this section, it shall be a rebuttable presumption that all hard mineral resources found on board a vessel subject to the provisions of sections 1464 and 1465 of this title which is seized in connection with an act prohibited by section 1461 of this title were recovered, processed, or retained in violation of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 96–283, title III, §306, June 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 580.)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

EDWARD JAROL MARTINEZ,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 614 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of February, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 6702
DANIEL ANGEL RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Daniel Rodriguez , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN JANSON FCI EDGEFIELD , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken

. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 1:23

- cv - 01893

- HMH )

Submitted : March 28, 2024 Decided: April 1, 2024

Before KING and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Danny Angel Rodriguez , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6702 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/01/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Danny Angel Rodriguez , a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Rodriguez ’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which Rodriguez sought to challenge his conviction by way of the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255

. Pursuant to § 2255(e), a prisoner may challenge his conviction in a traditional writ of habeas corpus purs u ant to § 2241 only if a § 2255 motion would be inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detentio n. See also Jones v. Hendrix , 599 U.S. 465, 478 (2023) (noting that a federal prisoner may only seek relief by way of § 2241 when “unusual circumstances make it impossible or impracticable to seek relief in the sentencing court, as well as [] challenges to detention other than collateral attacks on a sentence” )

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. Rodriguez v. Warden Janson FCI Edgefield , No. 1:23

- cv - 01893

- HMH (D.S.C. filed June 28 & entered June 29 , 2023)

. We grant Rodriguez’s motion for an extension of time. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6702 Doc: 8 Filed: 04/01/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-98-54 November 3, 1998

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT FERMI NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Lisle, Illinois,

have announced the assignment of Joe Larizza as a Resident

Inspector at the Fermi nuclear power plant in Monroe, Michigan.

Larizza joined the NRC in 1997 as a reactor engineer. Prior

to joining the NRC, he obtained an NRC Senior Reactor Operator

license and held various technical and management positions at

nuclear power plants in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New York. He

received a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the

Rochester Institute of Technology and a master’s degree in

nuclear engineering from The Pennsylvania State University.

Larizza resides in Monroe, Michigan.

Larizza joins NRC Senior Resident Inspector Garry Harris at

Fermi. They can be reached at the Fermi plant at 734/586-2798.

####
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-097 July 18, 2003

 NRC ISSUES DRAFT REPORT ON

FIRE HAZARD CALCULATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a draft report describing state-of-the-art

methods for performing fire dynamics calculations at nuclear power plants.

The report, “Fire Dynamics Tools (FDTs) - Quantitative Fire Hazard Analysis Methods

for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Fire Protection Inspection Program (Draft

NUREG-1805),” will help agency inspectors perform quick, first-order calculations for potential

fire scenarios, using principles of fire dynamics. The NRC inspectors will be able to use the

analytical methods and computer spreadsheets to perform evaluations of credible fires that could

cause critical damage to essential equipment necessary for post-fire safe-shutdown of the plants. 

Copies of draft NUREG-1805 and associated software are available on-line at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/docs4comment.html . A single free copy

of the report with CD Rom is available, as long as supplies last, from the Reproduction and

Distribution Services Section, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555;

fax: 301-415-2289; e-mail: DISTRIBUTION@nrc.gov .

Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the draft report and suggestions for

improvements within the 60-day period after publication of a Federal Register notice on this

subject, expected shortly. The comments should be sent by e-mail to nxi@nrc.gov , faxed to

301/415-2300, or sent by regular mail to Naeem Iqbal, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation,

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Mail Stop O-11-A11, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001. 

###
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Remy
International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rajesh K. Shah, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                            
|----------------------------
|/S/    RAJESH K. SHAH       
|Rajesh K. Shah              
|Executive Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer     









March 29, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Remy International, Inc. and will be retained by Remy International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-059 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 September 20, 2002

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATION INVOLVING 

NUCLEAR GAUGE WITH N.J. FIRM

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of a New Jersey company

on Thursday, September 26, to discuss an apparent violation of agency requirements. The apparent

violation by Craig Testing Laboratories, Inc., involves failure to maintain constant surveillance of a

portable nuclear density gauge in use at a construction site. The device was subsequently damaged.

 The predecisional enforcement conference is scheduled to begin at 11 a.m. in the Public

Meeting Room at the NRC Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa. The meeting will be open to the

public for observation, with NRC officials available to answer questions prior to adjournment.

 Craig Testing is based in Mays Landing, N.J. An NRC inspection determined that on July 15,

an employee of the firm was using the gauge, which contains radioactive material and can be used to

measure soil density, in a trench at Hopewell Valley High School in Pennington (Mercer County), N.J. 

At one point, the gauge user was asked to move his vehicle to allow construction equipment to pass. 

While doing that, he lost visual contact with the device and it was damaged by a forklift.

 While no one was injured as a result of the event, and the radioactive material inside was

found to be intact, a failure to maintain constant surveillance of a gauge in use represents an apparent

violation of NRC requirements.

 The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that the NRC has

made a final determination that a violation did occur or that enforcement action, such as a fine, is

warranted. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the apparent violation, its causes and its safety

significance. The meeting will also provide the company with an opportunity to address any errors that

may have been made in the NRC inspection report and to present its corrective actions.

 No decision on the apparent violation or any possible enforcement action will be made at the

conference. Those decisions will made by senior NRC officials at a later time.

 ###
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1384

To amend the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to eliminate a limitation 

on benefits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2003

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to eliminate 

a limitation on benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 3(f)(3) of the Railroad Retirement Act of 

4 1974 (45 U.S.C. 231b(f)(3)) is amended by striking ‘‘(ii) 

5 after an annuity has been certified for payment’’ and all 

6 that follows through ‘‘and (iii)’’ and inserting ‘‘and (ii)’’. 

7 The amendment made by this Act shall apply with respect 

8 to months beginning on or after January 1, 1978.

Æ
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-02-025 April 16, 2002

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: opa2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417 

ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING BOARD TO HOLD HEARING APRIL 23

 IN CHATTANOOGA ON TVA APPEAL OF NRC DISCRIMINATION RULING

 An independent Atomic Safety & Licensing Board appointed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission will conduct an evidentiary hearing in Chattanooga beginning April 23 on a Tennessee

Valley Authority appeal of a $110,000 civil penalty sought to be imposed by the NRC for alleged

violation of NRC employee protection requirements.

 The hearing will commence at 9:30 a.m.(EDT), at the United States Bankruptcy Court, Courtroom

A, Historic U.S. Courthouse, 31 East 11th Street, and will continue April 24-26, beginning at 9:00 a.m,

and, to the extent necessary, on April 30 - May 9, also commencing at 9:00 a.m. 

 The members of the Atomic Safety & Licensing Board established to preside over the hearing are

Charles Bechhoefer, Chairman; Ann Marshall Young and Dr. Richard F. Cole.

 Parties to this proceeding are TVA and the NRC staff. Issues to be considered are whether TVA

violated NRC requirements by discriminating against a former employee for engaging in protected

activities; and, if so, whether an NRC Order imposing a civil monetary penalty for the violations

should be sustained.

 Documents related to this proceeding issued prior to December 1, 1999, are available for public

inspection in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville

Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738, telephone 301- 415-4737 or 1-800-397-4209. Documents

issued subsequent to November 1, 1999, are available through the PDR and electronically through the

NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible to the public

through NRC’s Internet web site at www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/index.html . Help in using ADAMS 

is available by calling the PDR at the above telephone numbers. 

 The hearing is open to observation by interested members of the public.

### 

 EDITORS: No video and/or audio recording devices will be allowed during the proceeding 

 because they are prohibited inside the federal courthouse.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-81 November 24, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC, NNECO TO MEET ON MILLSTONE 2 INSPECTION FINDING ON NOV. 28

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of Northeast Nuclear Energy

Company (NNECO) on Tuesday, November 28, for a regulatory conference to discuss a finding of low

to moderate safety significance identified during a recent inspection at Millstone 2 in Waterford, Conn.

The meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. in the public meeting room in the NRC’s Region I office,

475 Allendale Road, in King of Prussia, Pa. It is open to the public for observation.

The NRC has characterized the inspection finding to be discussed as a potentially "white"

finding. Under the NRC's new reactor oversight process, inspection findings are evaluated under a

significance determination process and assigned a color that indicates safety significance. Findings

with very low safety significance are labeled "green." "White" findings have low to moderate

importance to safety and may require additional NRC inspection. Progressively more serious findings

are labeled "yellow" and "red," and receive commensurately greater oversight. A more detailed

explanation of the NRC's new reactor oversight process can be found on the NRC's website at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ROP/description.html .

The finding at Millstone involved a turbine-driven auxiliary feedwater pump, one of three

pumps that supplies water to the steam generators if the normal feedwater pumps are lost. Also, the

turbine-driven pump is designed to operate for events involving a loss of electrical power. NRC

inspectors determined NNECO failed to take prompt and comprehensive corrective actions in August,

after the pump exhibited erratic operation during a surveillance test. During the next test on September

20, operators determined that the pump was unable to perform its function. Further, it was determined

that the pump failure in September was related to the problem identified in August, which was not

corrected at that time. This failure has preliminarily been characterized as “white” because of the

pump's importance in mitigating plant events.

A regulatory conference is being held to provide NNECO officials an opportunity to present

information to the NRC that will help it to reach a final determination of the significance of the

inspection findings.

##
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-78 November 9, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING ON INDIAN POINT 2 NUCLEAR PLANT STATUS

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with the public on Thursday, November 16, to

provide an update on the status of the Indian Point 2 nuclear power plant, including the replacement of

the facility’s steam generators. The meeting is scheduled to begin at 7 p.m. at Cortlandt Town Hall, 1

Heady Street, Cortlandt Manor, N.Y.

Among the topics to be covered will be the results of recent NRC inspections and the status of

the agency’s ongoing review of site activities. In addition, members of the public will have an

opportunity to ask questions relating to NRC oversight of the plant.

Indian Point 2, located in Buchanan, N.Y., has been out of service since February 15, when the

facility experienced a steam generator tube failure. In August, Consolidated Edison decided to replace

all four of the plant’s steam generators -- large components that transfer heat from the reactor systems

to the power-generating portion of a nuclear power plant.

Company officials now hope to restart the plant before the end of the year.

###
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Naamit Salomon,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, that to my
knowledge:

|(1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
          applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  June 30, 2008 |  | /s/ Naamit Salomon

 Naamit SalomonChief Executive Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
CERTIFICATION OF
                            CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Yearly Report On Form 10-KSB of Tri Star
Holdings, Inc. Inc. for the Year Ended March 31, 2003, I, Michael Trotta, Chief
Executive Officer of Tri Star Holdings, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2003,
          fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the
          year ended March 31, 2003, fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of Tri Star
          Holdings, Inc.

Dated:  September 10, 2004

Tri Star Holdings, Inc.


By: /s/ Michael Trotta
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.2

**Certification ofCFO****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002****(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Gateway,Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended March 31, 2003 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the financial requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                |   |      |
|---------------------|--------|-----------|
| Dated: May 13, 2003 |   | By:  | /s/ RODERICK M. SHERWOOD III |
|                |   |      |  |
|                |   |      | **Roderick M. Sherwood III****Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer** |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.