alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 162.22 Seizure of conveyances. ( a ) *General applicability.* If it shall appear to any officer authorized to board conveyances and make seizures that there has been a violation of any law of the United States whereby a vessel, vehicle, aircraft, or other conveyance, or any merchandise on board of or imported by such vessel, vehicle, aircraft, or other conveyance is liable to forfeiture, the officer shall seize such conveyance and arrest any person engaged in such violation. Common carriers are exempted from seizure except under certain specified conditions as provided for in section 594, Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1594) and section 274(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324(b)(1)).
( b ) *Facilitating importation contrary to law.* Except as provided in § 171.52(b), every vessel, vehicle, animal, aircraft, or other thing, which is being or has been used in, or to aid or facilitate, the importation, bringing in, unlading, landing, removal, concealing, harboring or subsequent transportation of any article which is being, or has been introduced or attempted to be introduced into the United States contrary to law, shall be seized and held subject to forfeiture. Any person who directs, assists financially or otherwise, or is in any way concerned in any such unlawful activity shall be liable to a penalty equal to the value of the article or articles involved.
( c ) *Common carrier clearance.* Unless specifically authorized by law, clearance of vessels within the common carrier exception of section 594, Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1594), shall not be refused for the purpose of collecting a fine imposed upon the master or owner, unless either of them was a party to the illegal act. The Government's remedy in such cases is limited to an action against the master or owner.
( d ) *Maritime Administration vessels; exemption from penalty.* ( 1 ) When a vessel owned or chartered under bareboat charter by the Maritime Administration and operated for its account becomes liable for the payment of a penalty incurred for violation of the Customs revenue or navigation laws, clearance of the vessel shall not be withheld nor shall any proceedings be taken against the vessel itself looking to the enforcement of such liability.
( 2 ) This exemption shall not in any way be considered to relieve the master of any such vessel or other person incurring such penalties from personal liability for payment.
[T.D. 72-211, 37 FR 16488, Aug. 15, 1972, as amended by T.D. 89-86, 54 FR 37602, Sept. 11, 1989; USCBP-2006-0122, 73 FR 9012, Feb. 19, 2008]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Initial Review Group. Subcommittee A—Cancer Centers, Cancer Center Applications.                    

*Date:*                         April 7-8, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Marriott Bethesda North Hotel, 5701 Marinelli Road, Bethesda, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         David E. Maslow, PhD, Chief, Resources and Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard—Room 8117, Bethesda, MD 20892-8328, (301) 496-2330.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 19, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-23978  Filed 10-26-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 13.3

TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED

Certification

Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned, Lora Ho, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Spokesperson of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (the Company), hereby certifies, to her knowledge, that the
Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                               
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 13, 2017 |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                               
|                     |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Lora Ho                                                                                   
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Name: Lora Ho Title: Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and           Spokesperson

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 19.8 Examination of goods by importer; sampling; repacking; examination of merchandise by prospective purchasers.

Importers may, upon application approved by the port director on Customs Form 3499 examine, sample, and repack[12] or transfer merchandise in bonded warehouse. Where there will be no interference with the orderly conduct of Customs business and no danger to the revenue prospective purchaser may be permitted to examine merchandise in bonded warehouses upon the written request of the owner, importer, consignee, or transferee.

[28 FR 14763, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 82-204, 47 FR 49371, Nov. 1, 1982]

###### Footnotes -
  19.8

[12] Repacking shall be considered a manipulation within the purview of sec. 562, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Blu-ray Disc Founders (“BDF”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Blu-ray Disc Founders, Tokyo, Japan. The nature and scope of BDF's standards development activities are: (1) To establish the Blu-ray Disc Format for each application, as well as revisions, improvements and extensions of such Blu-ray Disc Format; (2) to organize activities to verify the compliance with the Blu-ray Disc Format and enable the broad acceptance of the Blu-ray Disc Format; (3) to promote the Blu-ray Disc Format as the format for recording, playback, storage and distribution of large volume content, including high definition content; and (4) to license the Blu-ray Disc Format and the Blu-ray Disc Logo.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-23781  Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CAPRICE BRITT

, *

* No. 1 7

- 1352 V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. * Filed: May 31, 2022

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; influenza (“flu”) vaccine;

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * SIRVA; shoulder injury.

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Leah V. Durant

, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC

, Washington, DC , for

Petitioner;

Catherine E. Stolar , United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for

Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION 1

On May 27, 2022 , the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition

for compensation filed by Capri ce Britt on September 2 7 , 201 7 . Petitioner alleged

that the influenza (“flu”) vaccine she received on October 4 , 201 6 , which is

contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), caused

her to suffer from a left shoulder injury related to vaccination administration

(“SIRVA”). Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of this

injury for more than six months. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior

award or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf as a result of her

condition.

1 T he E

- Government Act

, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and

Promotion of Electronic Government Services) , requires that the Court post this decision on its

website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the pa rties have 14 days to file a motion proposing

redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 12(d)(4).

Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.2

Respondent denies that the petitioner sustained a Table injury for SIRVA

and denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner to suffer a shoulder injury or any

other injury.

Nevertheless, th e parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The

undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the

Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include :

A lump sum payment of $ 121 ,000.00 in the form of a check payable to

petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that

would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B,

the clerk is directed to enter judgment according to this decision and the attached

stipulation. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED

.

s /Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vacc ine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each

party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal

Claims judge.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-cv-22951-BLOOM/Louis

THE SLIDING DOOR COMPANY,

a California corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

LEON BELL, individually; THE GLASS 

DOOR COMPANY, INC. d/b/a DOORS22, 

a Florida Corporation; and DAVID LUSTIG,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

AGREED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Acceptance of Defendants’ Offer of 

Judgement and Proposal for Settlement, ECF No. [27] (“Offer of Judgment”). The Court has 

carefully reviewed the Offer of Judgment, the record in this case, and is otherwise fully advised. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that FINAL JUDGMENT is entered against Defendants 

LEON BELL, DAVID LUSTIG and THE GLASS DOOR COMPANY, INC d/b/a DOORS22 

(“Defendants”). Defendants shall pay Plaintiff the sum of Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars 

($25,000.00) to settle this entire cause, which includes, all elements of damages, including but not 

limited to all attorneys’ fees, costs, interest, and punitive damages incurred in the litigation by 

either party.

Defendants LEON BELL, DAVID LUSTIG and THE GLASS DOOR COMPANY, INC 

d/b/a DOORS22 are here by permanently enjoined from using any image specifically identified 

on page 2, Page 16, Page 20 or Exhibit 2 of the Complaint, ECF No. [1]. 

Case 1:20-cv-22951-BB Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/02/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 20-cv-22951-BLOOM/Louis

2

Defendants LEON BELL, DAVID LUSTIG and THE GLASS DOOR COMPANY, INC 

d/b/a are here by permanently enjoined from distributing, shipping/exporting, importing, 

displaying, advertising, marketing promoting or using any image for which the copyright is owned 

by Plaintiff in connection with the selling and/or offering to sell any product by Defendants.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on November 2, 2020.

_________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: 

Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-22951-BB Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/02/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### Oscar Schlegel, Plaintiff, v. George A. Schamberger, Defendant.

Motion for stay granted on condition that within ten days after the entry of this order the defendant furnish a bond conditioned for the payment of the judgment, interest and any possible costs, the bond to be of two sufficient real estate sureties, who must justify on notice; otherwise, motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ. Order to be settled before the presiding justice.
### SUBCHAPTER II—REGULATORY ACCOUNTABILITY AND REFORM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO: 20-81300-CV-MIDDLEBROOKS

SHEA DRYDEN,

Plaintiff, 

v.

RAPID AUTO LOANS, LLC,

Defendant.

__________________________________________/

ORDER CLOSING CASE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Parties’ Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with

Prejudice, filed on March 15, 2021. (DE 22). The Court congratulates the Parties on their amicable 

resolution of this matter and notes that pursuant to Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 

1272 (11th Cir. 2012), the Parties’ Stipulation is self-executing and no Order of the Court is 

required to dismiss this action. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

(1) The above-styled action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

(2) The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE THIS CASE.

(3) Any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

(4) Each Party shall bear its own fees and costs.

(5) Pursuant to the Parties’ request, this Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of 

their settlement agreement. Jurisdiction will be retained for a period of six months.

SIGNED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Florida, this 16th day of March, 2021.

Donald M. Middlebrooks

United States District Judge

Case 9:20-cv-81300-DMM Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/16/2021 Page 1 of 1
### §1274. Public agencies, public utilities, and public corporations

Any agency, unit, or instrumentality of Federal, State, or local government, including any publicly owned utility or publicly owned corporation of Federal, State, or local government, which proposes to engage in surface coal mining operations which are subject to the requirements of this chapter shall comply with the provisions of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 95–87, title V, §524, Aug. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 511.)
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-016 March 14, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC SPECIAL INSPECTION TEAM AT SEABROOK STATION TO LOOK INTO

LAST WEEK’S “UNUSUAL EVENT”

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Special Inspection Team is on site at Seabrook Station

looking into last week’s loss of off-site power and subsequent reactor trip. Seabrook is operated by

North Atlantic Energy Service Company (NAESCO). The plant is located in Seabrook, N.H.

On March 5, Seabrook shutdown from full power due to local grid instability caused by a

severe snow storm. When power coming into the site was momentarily lost, both emergency diesel

generators automatically started and provided power to vital equipment. Operators declared an

“Unusual Event” --- the lowest of the emergency classifications. While the plant automatically shut

down safely and remained safe throughout the event, several pieces of equipment, including an

emergency feedwater pump, did not perform as expected.

The NRC has sent a special team to review the licensee’s root cause determinations for this

event and the corrective actions taken by NAESCO in response. The team also will evaluate the

licensee’s assessment of the risk associated with the event and perform an independent risk

assessment.

Three members of the team arrived on site on Monday. A fourth member is supporting the

team from the Regional Office in King of Prussia, Pa. An inspection report will be issued about 45

days from the end of the on-site inspection.

###
Bruce E. Reinhart, U.S. Magistrate Judge

20-80062-Cr-Ruiz/Reinhart

Case 9:20-cr-80062-RAR Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2020 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                             175
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                       907
<INVENTORY>                                     10,489
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,523
<PP&E>                                          23,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,599
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,382
<BONDS>                                         28,454
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            48
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,626
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,382
<SALES>                                         99,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,897
<CGS>                                           77,273
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (489)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,614
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,462
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,352
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                110
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    219
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       329
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Heavy-Duty Hybrid Onboard Diagnostics

FROM: Amy Kopin

TO: The Docket

DATE: July 21, 2011

On July 11th, and the 14

th, 2011 we held conference calls with Lisa A. Stegink of the 

Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA)to discuss concerns and questions raised by members 

of EMA regarding heavy-duty onboard diagnostic (OBD) requirements and timing. EMA

members raised concerns during the comment period for the heavy-duty greenhouse gas notice of 

proposed rulemaking that heavy-duty hybrid applications may not be able to meet the 2013 

heavy-duty OBD regulations that were published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking. 1,2 

Specifically, they have requested a delay of the application of HD OBD requirements for hybrid 

applications until 2020. Attendees from the EPA included Cleophas Jackson, Anthony Neam, 

and Amy Kopin.

 

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Mediumand Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished December 29, 2010. Available here: 

http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-12-29/html/2010-32726.htm

2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule 

Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic Systems on 2010 and Later Heavy-Duty Engines Used in Highway 

Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy-Duty 

Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd-obd-frm-02-24-09-notice-74-fr-8310.pdf

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on FormS-8 (No 333 - 65543) dated October 9, 1998, Form S-8 (No 333 - 108085) dated August 19, 2003, and Form S-3 (No 333 - 104702) dated April 23, 2003, of our report dated March 11, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements,management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this annual report on Form 10-K. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers Sp. z o.o. 

 

Warsaw, Poland 

March 11, 2005