alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Fabrication Flaw Density and Distribution in Repairs to Reactor Pressure Vessel and Piping Welds (NUREG/CR-6945)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6945, (PDF - 29.80 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** July 2007**Date Published:** April 2008

**Prepared by:** G.J. Schuster, F.A. Simonen, S.R. Doctor

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory P.O. Box 999 Richland, WA 99352

W.E. Norris, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:**Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code N6398

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is developing a generalized fabrication flaw distribution for the population of nuclear reactor pressure vessels and for piping welds in U.S. operating reactors. The purpose of the generalized flaw distribution is to predict component-specific flaw densities. The estimates of fabrication flaws are intended for use in fracture mechanics structural integrity assessments. Structural integrity assessments, such as estimating the frequency of loss-of-coolant accidents, are performed by computer codes that require, as input, accurate estimates of flaw densities. Welds from four different reactor pressure vessels and a collection of archived pipes have been studied to develop empirical estimates of fabrication flaw densities.

 This report describes the fabrication flaw distribution and characterization in the repair weld metal of vessels and piping. This work indicates that large flaws occur in these repairs. These results show that repair flaws are complex in composition and sometimes include cracks on the ends of the repair cavities. Parametric analysis using an exponential fit is performed on the data.

 The relevance of construction records is established for describing fabrication processes and product forms. An analysis of these records shows there was a significant change in repair frequency over the years when these components were fabricated. A description of repair flaw morphology is provided with a discussion of fracture mechanics significance. Fabrication flaws in repairs are characterized using optimized-access, high-sensitivity nondestructive ultrasonic testing. Flaw characterizations are then validated by other nondestructive evaluation techniques and complemented by destructive testing.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector RAMOS-MENDIOLA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40204.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

*234James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Hector Ramos-Mendiola (Ramos) appeals his conviction and sentence following his guilty plea to possession of more than 100 kilograms of marijuana with intent to distribute. Ramos argues for the first time on appeal that the district court abused its discretion when it imposed a condition of supervised release that requires him to cooperate in the collection of his DNA. Ramos’s claim is not ripe for review. *See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir. 2005), *petition for cert, filed*(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662). Therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction to review this claim, and this portion of the appeal is dismissed.

Ramos correctly notes that his argument, made for the first time on appeal, that the district court lacked jurisdiction to convict and sentence him because 21 U.S.C. § 841 is unconstitutional under *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is foreclosed by *United States v. Slaughter,*238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir.2000). Ramos’s conviction is affirmed.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 10.115 - Letter Agreement with Short-Term Bridge Loan Lenders





	


January
14, 2003




Weichert Enterprise LLC

1625 State Route 10

Morris Plains, New Jersey 07950

Attn:  Gerald C. Crotty, President 



DL Holdings I, LLC 

c/o Reservoir Capital

650 Madison Avenue

New York, New York 10022 

Attn:   Marc A. Schwartz, Vice President 











			
		Re:	Eos International, Inc./Weichert Enterprise LLC/

DL Holdings I, LLC
			







	



        Reference
is made to (i) the Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement by and among Eos
International, Inc. (the “Company”), DL Holdings I, LLC (“DL
Holdings”), and Weichert Enterprise LLC (“Weichert”), dated as
of January 14, 2003 (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), (ii) the
Amended and Restated Common Stock Purchase Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,000,000
shares of common stock of the Company, dated as of January 14, 2003, issued by the Company
to DL Holdings and Weichert (the “Warrants”), and (iii) the Secured
$3,500,000 Bridge Loan Promissory Note, date as of December 14, 2001, as amended, issued
by the Company to DL Holdings and the Secured $3,000,000 Bridge Loan Promissory Note,
dated as of December 14, 2001, as amended, issued by the Company to Weichert Enterprises,
LLC (together, the “Notes”). Capitalized terms not defined herein shall
have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Registration Rights Agreement. 



        Notwithstanding
the provisions of Section 3 of the Registration Rights Agreement, in consideration of the
repayment of the Notes on the date hereof, the parties hereto hereby agree that no
Designated Holder (as defined in the Registration Rights Agreement) shall exercise Demand
Registration rights under the Registration Rights Agreement until no earlier than 180 days
after the date of this letter; provided, however, that if the Company
registers under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, shares of its common stock sold in
a private placement on the date hereof or issued to shareholders of I.F.S. of New Jersey,
Inc. (“IFS”) in the Company’s merger with IFS prior to the date 180
days after the date hereof, the Company shall offer the Designated Holders the right to
have their shares so registered on such earlier date. 



        By
countersigning this agreement where indicated below and returning it to the Company, each
of Weichert and DL Holdings agrees to, and accepts, the terms of this agreement. 









        Please
indicate your confirmation of the foregoing by signing where indicated below and promptly
returning this letter to the Company. 











			EOS INTERNATIONAL, INC.



By:  PETER A. LUND
——————————————

Name:  Peter A. Lund

Title:    Chairman








	AGREED UPON AND ACCEPTED BY:


WEICHERT ENTERPRISE LLC



By:  GERALD C. CROTTY
——————————————

Name:  Gerald C. Crotty

Title:    President		








	


DL HOLDINGS I, LLC



By:  MARC A. SCHWARTZ
——————————————

Name:  Marc A. Schwartz

Title:    Vice President
§ 1201.83 Serving subpoenas. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 72962 , Sept. 9, 2024.
( a ) Any person who is at least 18 years of age and who is not a party to the appeal may serve a subpoena. The means prescribed by applicable state law are sufficient. The party who requested the subpoena, and to whom the subpoena has been issued, is responsible for serving the subpoena.
( b ) A subpoena directed to an individual outside the territorial jurisdiction of any court of the United States may be served in the manner described by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for service of a subpoena in a foreign country.
#### § 190.191 Purpose.

This subpart sets forth the requirements for the drawback compliance program in which claimants and other parties in interest, including customs brokers, may participate after being certified by CBP. Participation in the program is voluntary. Under the program, CBP is required to inform potential drawback claimants and related parties clearly about their rights and obligations under the drawback law and regulations. Reduced penalties and/or warning letters may be issued once a party has been certified for the program, and is in general compliance with the appropriate procedures and requirements thereof.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF

APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

AUGUST 11, 2005

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-11778

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 03-01956-CV-BE-S

EMANUEL FORD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BIRMINGHAM, CITY OF,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

_________________________

(August 11, 2005)

Before CARNES, MARCUS and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff Emanuel Ford appeals following the district court’s grant of summary

judgment for the City of Birmingham on Ford’s claims for false arrest and excessive
2

use of force under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We conclude that the district court properly

granted the City’s motion for summary judgment for the reasons stated in the district

court’s opinions. (R.2-32 and R.2-36.) 

Ford also contends that the district court abused its discretion in denying Ford’s

motion to amend his complaint. “[I]t is not an abuse of discretion for a district court

to deny a motion for leave to amend following the close of discovery, past the

deadline for amendments, and past the deadline for filing dispositive motions.”

Carruthers v. BSA Advertising, Inc., 357 F.3d 1213, 1218 (11th Cir. 2004) (quoting

Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc. v. Olin Corp., 313 F.3d 1307, 1315 (11th Cir. 2002).

Given that Ford’s motion to amend the complaint wasfiled months after the deadline

for amending the complaint had passed, we find no abuse of discretion in the district

court’s denial of Ford’s motion to amend his complaint. (R.2-27 and R.2-30.)

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT32**

 

**Certificationpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted**

**pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Eastern American Natural Gas Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not inits individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Trust at the dates and forthe periods presented.

 

The above certificationis furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Qor as a separate disclosure document.

 

 
|   | JPMorgan Chase Bank,  N.A., Trustee,            |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   | Trustee for Eastern  American Natural Gas Trust |
|   |                                            |
|   |                                            |
|   | By:                                             | /s/ Mike Ulrich |   |
|   |                                            | Vice  President |
|   |                                            | JPMorgan  Chase Bank, N.A., Trustee |
|        |                                                 |  |  |  |

 

1

----
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-02-0199 - Denial of Petition for Rulemaking to Use Information from Prior Licensing Actions as Resolved Information for Early Site Permit and Combined License Applications (PRM 52-1)

Accession Number: ML022240555

Date Released: Friday, October 3, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML022240601 - SECY-02-0199, "Denial of  Petition for Rulemaking to Use Information from Prior Licensing Actions as Resolved Information for Early Site Permit and Combined License Applications (PRM-52-1)" (5 page(s), 11/8/2002)
    - ML022250050 - SECY-02-0199-Attachment 1- PRM 52-1, Nuclear Energy Institute; Denial of Petition for Rulemaking (40 page(s), 11/8/2002)
    - ML022250414 - SECY-02-0199-Attachment 2- Draft Letter to R. Bishop re:  PRM 52-1, Petition for Rulemaking to Use Information from Prior Licensing Actions as Resolved Information for Early Site Permit and Combined License Applications (4 page(s), 11/8/2002)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Return
      to Main Document





EXHIBIT
      32.2








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Mexoro Minerals Limited (the “Company”) on
      Form
      10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2005, as filed with the United
      States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:








(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and








(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














Date:
      March 16, 2007


/s/
      Kurt
      Bordian


Chief
      Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2005, of Synagro Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert C. Boucher, Jr., certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company and that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


                                        /s/ Robert C. Boucher, Jr.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert C. Boucher, Jr.
                                        November 9, 2005


                                       38
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1487 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1487

  To direct the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to prepare a 
report about how the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 has been used by 
    public and private sector employers to foster or exacerbate pay 
                               inequity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 27, 2003

Ms. Millender-McDonald (for herself, Mr. Case, Ms. Watson, Ms. Lee, Ms. 
   Jackson-Lee of Texas, Ms. Norton, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. 
   Owens, and Mr. Kucinich) introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to prepare a 
report about how the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 has been used by 
    public and private sector employers to foster or exacerbate pay 
                               inequity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Equal Pay Improvement Report Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. REPORT BY EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION.

     Not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, using information supplied 
by the Department of Labor, the Office of Management and Budget, and 
the General Accounting Office, shall submit a report to the Congress 
making findings and recommendations relating to how the Fair Labor 
Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) has been used by public 
and private sector employers to foster or exacerbate pay inequities, 
especially such inequities based on an employee's gender, race, color, 
religion, or national origin, or such other factor as the Commission 
finds relevant.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Getty
Images, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Jonathan D. Klein, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 12, 2007



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|/S/    JONATHAN D. KLEIN                                
|Jonathan D. Klein Co-Founder and Chief Executive
Officer
AAM-11-195-E 

March 7, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10220 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0170 

Mr. Lawrence Ihle 

Coastal Helicopters, LLC 

P.O. Box 715 

Nags Head, NC 27959 

Dear Mr. Ihle: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated February 14, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Coastal Helicopters, LLC (Coastal) for an exemption to allow Coastal, which is 

operating under separate parts of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), to cover its 

safety-sensitive employees under one drug testing program. The FAA finds that you require 

exemption from part 120 of 14 CFR. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Coastal. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one 

would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 
2 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Coastal Helicopters, LLC an exemption from part 120 to 

the extent necessary to allow Coastal, which is operating under separate parts of the 

regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the 

conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Coastal are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times 

while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the Coastal part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on March 31, 2013 unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331

No. I-00-05 January 18, 2000

NRC TO PROVIDE RESULTS OF OYSTER CREEK RADIOLOGICAL REVIEW

On Tuesday, January 25, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will present the

results of its review of the radiological condition of land adjacent to the Oyster Creek nuclear

power plant that the facility’s current owner, GPU Nuclear Corp., plans to sell. The meeting is

scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. in Administration Building cafeteria at the plant, which is located on

Route 9 in Lacey Township, N.J.

The meeting will be open to the public for observation. NRC staff members will be

available afterward to answer questions.

GPU Nuclear intends to sell about 600 acres of the 755-acre site. The transaction would

reduce the current site boundary around the plant to enclose only about 150 acres of land.

The NRC staff has been evaluating the proposed sale to determine if there are any issues

that have the potential to adversely affect public health and safety, impact the environment or

compromise the continued safe operation of Oyster Creek. As part of that review, NRC staff

conducted an on-site confirmatory survey and inspection from November 15 to 18 to verify and

validate GPU Nuclear’s assessment of the radiological condition of the land involved in the sale.

At the meeting on January 25, the findings from those assessments will be provided.

#