alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99(b)


                         Independent Accountants' Report
                         -------------------------------

The Board of Directors
Household Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of consumer loan
receivables owned by Household Consumer Loan Trust 1997-1 (the receivables) has
been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with
the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles III and IV and Section 8.08 of
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated September 1, 1995, as supplemented, as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2002. Household Finance Corporation's
management is responsible for the assertion. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the
servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and
conditions as set forth in Articles III and IV and Section 8.08 of the
Agreement, as supplemented, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of consumer loan
receivables owned by Household Consumer Loan Trust 1997-1 has been conducted by
Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and
conditions as set forth in Articles III and IV and Section 8.08 of the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement dated September 1, 1995, as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material respects.



                                       /s/ KPMG LLP
                                       ------------
                                       KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2003
<PAGE>

                              Management Assertion
                              --------------------


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, the servicing of consumer loan
receivables owned by Household Consumer Loan Trust 1997-1 has been conducted by
Household Consumer Lending, a division of Household Finance Corporation, in its
capacity as subservicer for Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in
compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles III and IV and
Section 8.08 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated September 1, 1995, as
supplemented.



/s/ JOE VOZAR                               /s/ JORGE CORDON
-----------------------------------         -----------------------------------
Joe Vozar                                   Jorge Cordon
Chief Financial Officer-                    Managing Director- Operations-
Household Consumer Lending                  Household Consumer Lending


February 28, 2003                           February 28, 2003
-----------------------------------         -----------------------------------
Date                                        Date
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-045 April 24, 2001

NRC TO MEET WITH PUBLIC ON MAY 11 TO DISCUSS USE OF

RISK INFORMATION IN REGULATING NUCLEAR WASTE AND MATERIALS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with the public on May 11 in Rockville,

Maryland, to discuss criteria it is developing for determining when risk information should be used in

the regulation of nuclear waste and materials.

The meeting will be held in the auditorium of the agency's Two White Flint North building,

11545 Rockville Pike, from 9 a.m to noon, and from 1:30 to 4:30 p.m.

NRC officials will discuss two case studies in which the criteria under development were tested

by applying them to the decommissioning of the Trojan nuclear plant in Oregon, and the transport of the

plant’s reactor vessel to a disposal site. The case studies were part of an overall effort by the NRC’s

Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards to examine the feasibility of using risk information

in its regulation of waste and materials.

NRC has previously held public meetings to discuss how risk information is being used to

regulate gas chromatographs, static eliminators and fixed gauges, which all use radioactive material.

The NRC staff’s case study approach, the draft screening criteria, and the case study areas under

consideration are described in the “Plan for Using Risk Information in the Materials and Waste Arenas:

Case Studies” published in the Federal Register on November 7, 2000. The document also is available

at: http://www.nrc.gov/NMSS/IMNS/riskcasestudyplan.htm on the NRC web site. Additional

information about the meeting is available from Marissa Bailey at (301) 415-7648 or by e-mail at:

MGB@NRC.GOV

###
### SUBCHAPTER V—CONTROL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF SURFACE COAL MINING
|    |                                                                                                                |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Vanguard Health Systems, Inc.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   | /s/ Charles N. Martin, Jr. |
|   | Charles N. Martin, Jr. |
|   | Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
INVITATION: HEAVY-DUTY MVAC

STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP

Hosted By: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Air and

Radiation, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Stratospheric Protection Division

Date: November 18, 2015

Time: 1:30 – 3:00 p.m. (please plan to arrive by 1:15 p.m. to sign in)

Location: EPA, 1201 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20004, Room 4225

Background: EPA hosted a meeting on September 11, 2015, for interested stakeholders

to exchange information on recent and future actions under the Significant New

Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program. During the past 12 months, EPA has taken four

separate actions under the SNAP program, to support the President’s June 2013 Climate

Action Plan, which directs EPA to “use its authority through the Significant New

Alternatives Policy Program to encourage private sector investment in low-emissions

technology by identifying and approving climate-friendly chemicals while prohibiting

certain uses of the most harmful chemical alternatives.” As part of SNAP’s continuing

efforts, we are hosting this workshop which will concentrate on motor vehicle air

conditioning (MVAC) systems for heavy-duty vehicles within the refrigeration and air

conditioning sector.

Logistics: Please RSVP by November 13th to Paul-Harvey Weiner with a direct reply to

this e-mail (weiner.paul-harvey@epa.gov) or by telephone at (202) 343-9740. Please

include your name and affiliation. You are welcome to share this invitation with other

interested participants; however, please ask them to RSVP by November 13th as well. We

look forward to a productive and informative meeting.

PAGE 1 OF 1

www.epa.gov/ozone/snap
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-163 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, September 11, 1998)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commissions’ Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards

(ACRS) has scheduled a meeting of its Subcommittee on Planning and Procedures on

September 29 in Rockville, Maryland.

The subcommittee will meet from 10:00 a.m. until noon in Room T-2B1 of the NRC’s

Two White Flint North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike. The subcommittee will discuss

proposed ACRS activities and qualifications of candidates for appointment.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for public comment, will be

described in a Notice of Meeting published in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

#
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0089 - Proposed Bulletin: " Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Sump Recirculation at Pressurized-Water Reactors"

Accession Number: ML031060640

Date Released: Monday, June 16, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML031060624 - SECY-03-0089 - Proposed Bulletin: " Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Sump Recirculation at Pressurized-Water Reactors" (4 page(s), 6/2/2003)
    - ML031060638 - SECY-03-0089-Attachment - Proposed NRC Bulletin 2003-XX: Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Sump Recirculation at Pressurized-Water Reactors (13 page(s), 6/2/2003)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### §640. House approval of regular appropriation bills

It shall not be in order in the House of Representatives to consider any resolution providing for an adjournment period of more than three calendar days during the month of July until the House of Representatives has approved annual appropriation bills providing new budget authority under the jurisdiction of all the subcommittees of the Committee on Appropriations for the fiscal year beginning on October 1 of such year. For purposes of this section, the chairman of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives shall periodically advise the Speaker as to changes in jurisdiction among its various subcommittees.

(Pub. L. 93–344, title III, §309, July 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 314; Pub. L. 99–177, title II, §201(b), Dec. 12, 1985, 99 Stat. 1052.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1330 of Title 31 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 31, Money and Finance, by Pub. L. 97–258, §1, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 877.

#### Amendments

1985—Pub. L. 99–177 substituted "House approval of regular appropriation bills" for "Completion of action on bills providing new budget authority and certain new spending authority" in section catchline, and amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "Except as otherwise provided pursuant to this subchapter, not later than the seventh day after Labor Day of each year, the Congress shall complete action on all bills and resolutions—

"(1) providing new budget authority for the fiscal year beginning on October 1 of such year, other than supplemental, deficiency, and continuing appropriation bills and resolutions, and other than the reconciliation bill for such year, if required to be reported under section 641(c) of this title; and

"(2) providing new spending authority described in section 651(c)(2)(C) of this title which is to become effective during such fiscal year.

Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any bill or resolution if legislation authorizing the enactment of new budget authority to be provided in such bill or resolution has not been timely enacted."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1985 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–177 effective Dec. 12, 1985, and applicable with respect to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 1985, see section 275(a)(1) of Pub. L. 99–177, formerly set out as an Effective and Termination Dates note under section 900 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 112–25, title I, §104(a), Aug. 2, 2011, 125 Stat. 246.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**





**eMAGIN
      CORPORATION**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      John
      Atherly, the Chief Financial Officer of eMagin Corporation (the "Company"),
      certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
        the
        Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended December
        31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
        (a)
        or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
        and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      eMagin Corporation and will be retained by eMagin Corporation and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: April
                  30th, 2007
              By:
              /s/ John
                  AtherlyJohn Atherly*Chief
                  Financial Officer*
#### §§ 1207.111-1207.119 [Reserved]
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, William J. Doré, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.August 8, 2006                                                               /s/ WILLIAM J. DORÉ   William J. Doré   Chief Executive Officer   
1
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComparison of the quadratic configuration interaction and coupled cluster approaches to electron correlation including the effect of triple excitationsThe recently proposed quadratic configuration interaction (QCI) method is compared with the more rigorous coupled cluster (CC) approach for a variety of chemical systems. Some of these systems are well represented by a single-determinant reference function and others are not. The finite order singles and doubles correlation energy, the perturbational triples correlation energy, and a recently devised diagnostic for estimating the importance of multireference effects are considered. The spectroscopic constants of CuH, the equilibrium structure of cis-(NO)2 and the binding energies of Be3, Be4, Mg3, and Mg4 were calculated using both approaches. The diagnostic for estimating multireference character clearly demonstrates that the QCI method becomes less satisfactory than the CC approach as non-dynamical correlation becomes more important, in agreement with a perturbational analysis of the two methods and the numerical estimates of the triple excitation energies they yield. The results for CuH show that the differences between the two methods become more apparent as the chemical systems under investigation becomes more multireference in nature and the QCI results consequently become less reliable. Nonetheless, when the system of interest is dominated by a single reference determinant both QCI and CC give very similar results.Document ID19910007414Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsTaylor, Peter R.*(Eloret Corp. Sunnyvale, CA., United States)*Lee, Timothy J.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA., United States)*Rendell, Alistair P.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryAtomic And Molecular PhysicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:187855NASA-CR-187855Accession Number91N16727Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC2-371Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910007414.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 17, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 11, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 494 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2019-45, CP2019-48.                

Elizabeth Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2018-27191 Filed 12-14-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
PUBLIC LAW 106–337—OCT. 19, 2000 114 STAT. 1311

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4517:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

July 18, considered and passed House.

Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–337

106th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 24 Tsienneto

Road in Derry, New Hampshire, as the ‘‘Alan B. Shepard, Jr. Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

24 Tsienneto Road in Derry, New Hampshire, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Alan B. Shepard, Jr. Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Alan B.

Shepard, Jr. Post Office Building’’.

Approved October 19, 2000.

Oct. 19, 2000

[H.R. 4517]
#### § 210.26 Other motions.

Motions pertaining to discovery shall be filed in accordance with § 210.15 and the pertinent provisions of subpart E of this part (§§ 210.27 through 210.34). Motions pertaining to evidentiary hearings and prehearing conferences shall be filed in accordance with § 210.15 and the pertinent provisions of subpart F of this part (§§ 210.35 through 210.40). Motions for temporary relief shall be filed as provided in subpart H of this part (see §§ 210.52 through 210.57).