alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1011. Termination of leases

Leases may be terminated by the Secretary for any violation of the regulations or lease terms after thirty days notice provided that such violation is not corrected within the notice period, or in the event the violation is such that it cannot be corrected within the notice period then provided that lessee has not commenced in good faith within said notice period to correct such violation and thereafter to proceed diligently to correct such violation. Lessee shall be entitled to a hearing on the matter of such claimed violation or proposed termination of lease if request for a hearing is made to the Secretary within the thirty-day period after notice. The period for correction of violation or commencement to correct such violation of regulations or of lease terms, as aforesaid, shall be extended to thirty days after the Secretary's decision after such hearing if the Secretary shall find that a violation exists.

(Pub. L. 91–581, §12, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1570; Pub. L. 109–58, title II, §236(12), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 672.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2005—Pub. L. 109–58 inserted section catchline.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62297-62298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23795]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employee Benefits Security Administration


128th Plenary Meeting; Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and 
Pension Benefit Plans; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, the 
128th open meeting of the full Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and 
Pension Benefit Plans will be held on Wednesday, November 10, 2004.
    The session will take place in Room S-2508, U.S. Department of 
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. The purpose 
of the open meeting, which will run from 1:30 p.m. to approximately 
3:30 p.m., is for the Working Groups to submit their reports for the 
full Advisory Council's review and acceptance, and for the Council to 
forward the reports to the Secretary of Labor.
    Organizations or members of the public wishing to submit a written 
statement pertaining to the meeting may do so by submitting 20 copies 
to Larry

[[Page 62298]]

Good, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory Council, U.S. Department of 
Labor, Room N-5656, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. 
Statements received on or before November 3, 2004, will be included in 
the record of the meeting. Individuals or representatives of 
organizations wishing to address the Advisory Council should forward 
their request to the Executive Secretary at the above address or via 
telephone at (202) 693-8668. Oral presentations will be limited to 10 
minutes, but an extended statement may be submitted for the record. 
Individuals with disabilities who need special accommodations should 
contact Larry Good by November 3 at the address indicated in this 
notice.

    Signed at Washington, DC., this 19th day of October, 2004.
Ann L. Combs,
Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-23795 Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23656]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel, Services Conflicts 1.
    Date: November 12, 2004.
    Time: 1:30 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Marina Broitman, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute 
of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., 
Room 6153, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, 301-402-8152, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2e434c5c41475a434f6e434f47420040474600494158"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="caa7a8b8a5a3bea7ab8aa7aba3a6e4a4a3a2e4ada5bc">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health 
Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist 
Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 
93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research 
Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: October 14, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-23656 Filed 10-21-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-cv-23340-UU

MOISES MARIA GOMEZ,

Plaintiff, 

v.

FM 12 LIQUORS, INC., et al.,

Defendants. 

_________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before the Court following a settlement conference before Chief U.S. 

Magistrate Judge John J. O’Sullivan concerning settlement of Plaintiff’s claims against 

Defendants. Magistrate Judge O’Sullivan subsequently issued an Order Approving Settlement 

Agreement and Recommending That the Case Be Administratively Closed (D.E. 26) 

(“Recommendation”). The Court has reviewed the Recommendation and pertinent parts of the 

record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.

Upon de novo review, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge O’Sullivan’s 

Recommendation and concurs in all findings. Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Recommendation, D.E. 26, is RATIFIED, 

ADOPTED, and AFFIRMED. The case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the Court will 

retain jurisdiction until May 26, 2021 to enforce the terms of the settlement. It is further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case be administratively CLOSED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Miami, Florida, this 29th day of October, 2020.

Case 1:20-cv-23340-UU Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/29/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

_____________________________

URSULA UNGARO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: 

Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge John J. O’Sullivan

Counsel of Record via CM/ECF

Case 1:20-cv-23340-UU Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/29/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### Anthony N. MINGLEDOUGH, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent.

No. 01-3316.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 16, 2002.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                   Certification of Periodic Financial Reports

I, Deborah C. DeRouen, of OMNI Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A/3 for the period ended December 31,
         2003 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully
         complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

(2)      the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of OMNI Energy Services Corp.


Dated:  September 14, 2004



                                      /s/ Deborah C. DeRouen
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                               Deborah C. DeRouen
                                               Chief Accounting Officer
                                               (Principal Financial Officer)
#### § 101.8 Identification cards.

Each Customs employee shall be issued an appropriate identification card with that employee's photograph and signature, signed by the appropriate issuing officer.
Exhibit 32.1



                       CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



William F. Garrett,  the President and Chief  Executive  Officer of Delta Mills,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:

     1.   The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 28, 2003 of the
          Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
          (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

The foregoing  certification  is being furnished  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350
and is not  being  filed  as  part of the  Report  or as a  separate  disclosure
document.






Date       September 25, 2003            By: /s/ William F. Garrett
      -------------------------------    ------------------------------------
                                         William F. Garrett
                                         President & Chief Executive Officer





A  signed  copy  of  this  written  statement  required  by  section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, B. K. Chin, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s latest fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.August 2, 2007             /s/ B. K. Chin   B. K. Chin   Chief Executive Officer
#### Bertha Farber, as Administratrix of the Estate of Jacob Farber, Deceased, Appellant, v. Barnat Realty Corporation, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.924 Indirect materials.

An indirect material, as defined in § 10.902(m) of this subpart, will be considered to be an originating material without regard to where it is produced.

# Example.

Peruvian Producer A produces good C using non-originating material B. Producer A imports non-originating rubber gloves for use by workers in the production of good C. Good C is subject to a tariff shift requirement. As provided in § 10.914(b)(1) of this subpart and General Note 32(n), each of the non-originating materials in good C must undergo the specified change in tariff classification in order for good C to be considered originating. Although non-originating material B must undergo the applicable tariff shift in order for good C to be considered originating, the rubber gloves do not because they are indirect materials and are considered originating without regard to where they are produced.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Nellie H. Smith, Respondent, against Rochester Fuel & Feed Company et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-008 January 29, 2001

NRC ALLOWS REACTOR LICENSEES TO SUBMIT DOCUMENTS ELECTRONICALLY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is allowing its reactor licensees to voluntarily submit

documents to the agency electronically or in CD format if certain procedures and requirements are

followed. Previously, the staff has granted specific exceptions, on a case-by-case basis, to the

requirement that only paper copies of documents be submitted.

Since June of last year, the NRC has been testing a pilot program with several licensees that

allows them to submit electronic documents in a secure manner. Digital certificates, which are data

structures that contain unique identifiers, and digital signatures, which enable users to electronically

sign documents, are assigned to the sender and assure that documents are authentic and certified.

The staff is now expanding the program, and the voluntary arrangement is described in a

“regulatory issues summary” sent to all reactor licensees.

The NRC intends to issue a rule this year which would allow all licensees, applicants, and

members of the public to submit documents electronically or in CD format. The rule would also

address other submittal methods such as diskette, digital video disks, and e-mails.

This current initiative does not apply to documents that are submitted by operating reactor

licensees to support the reactor oversight process, for which the NRC will provide separate guidance.

It also does not include adjudicatory documents such as those submitted to the Atomic Safety and

Licensing Board or the Commission. Those must continue to be filed on paper.

More guidance on the electronic submittal program and instructions on how to obtain a digital

certificate, are located on the NRC’s web page, at www.nrc.gov/NRC/EIE/index.html

###
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93018, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 134.44 Location and other acceptable methods of marking. ( a ) *Other acceptable methods.* Except for articles described in § 134.43 of this part or the subject of a ruling by the Commissioner of Customs, any method of marking at any location insuring that country of origin will conspicuously appear on the article shall be acceptable. Such marking must be legible and sufficiently permanent so that it will remain on the article (or its container when the container and not the article is required to be marked) until it reaches the ultimate purchaser unless deliberately removed.
( b ) *Articles marked with paper sticker labels.* If paper sticker or pressure sensitive labels are used, they must be affixed in a conspicuous place and so securely that unless deliberately removed they will remain on the article while it is in storage or on display and until it is delivered to the ultimate purchaser.
( c ) *Articles marked with tags.* When tags are used, they must be attached in a conspicuous place and in a manner which assures that unless deliberately removed they will remain on the article until it reaches the ultimate purchaser.
[T.D. 72-262, 37 FR 20318, Sept. 29, 1972, as amended by T.D. 94-1, 58 FR 69472, Dec. 30, 1993]
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-004 January 16, 2001

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING ON NUCLEAR RESEARCH

IN MARYLAND ON JANUARY 24 - 25

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has scheduled a public meeting to discuss the role

and direction of nuclear regulatory research on January 24 and 25 in Bethesda, Maryland. Participants

in the meeting, the third in a series, will include government officials, members of the general public,

industry representatives, and experts from academia and the international arena.

The public meeting will be held at the Marriott Residence Inn at 7335 Wisconsin Avenue in

Bethesda, one block south of Bethesda Metro Station on the Red Line. It will start at 8 a.m. each day,

and is expected to end by 5 p.m.

The session will include discussion of a draft report that is composed of the individual views

and recommendations of the group experts on the role and future direction of nuclear regulatory

research. The report is available on the NRC’s web site, at www.nrc.gov/RES/nrc.html . Strategies

to evaluate and implement the recommendations also will be discussed at the meeting. In addition, the

agency’s licensing and regional offices will provide an overview of their technical assistance and

research activities.

Those who seek additional information or agenda updates on the meeting, should contact Jim

Johnson, at 301-415-6293. Seating for the meeting is limited and will be on a first-come, first-serve

basis.

###
```

[House Report 110-745]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

110th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     110-745

======================================================================

 
PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 5811) TO AMEND TITLE 44, 
   UNITED STATES CODE, TO REQUIRE PRESERVATION OF CERTAIN ELECTRONIC 
  RECORDS BY FEDERAL AGENCIES, TO REQUIRE A CERTIFICATION AND REPORTS 
        RELATING TO PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES

                                _______
                                

July 8, 2008.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Welch, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                      [To accompany H. Res. 1318]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 1318, by a non-record vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5811, the 
``Electronic Message Preservation Act,'' under a closed rule. 
The resolution provides for one hour of debate equally divided 
and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
    The resolution waives all points of order against 
consideration of the bill except those arising under clause 9 
or 10 of rule XXI. The resolution provides that the amendment 
in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
Oversight and Government Reform shall be considered as adopted 
and the bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. The 
resolution waives all points of order against provisions of the 
bill. This waiver does not affect the point of order available 
under clause 9 of rule XXI (regarding earmark disclosure).
    The resolution provides one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions. Finally, notwithstanding the operation of 
the previous question, the Chair may postpone further 
consideration until a time designated by the Speaker.

                         EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

    Although the rule waives all points of order against the 
bill and its consideration (except for those arising under 
clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI), the Committee is not aware of any 
specific points of order. The waivers of all points of order 
against the bill and against its consideration are 
prophylactic.

                                  

```