alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.20

CellPoint Inc,"the Seller", and CellFree AB,"the Buyer" have on this day entered
into the following



         1.  AGREEMENT


Whereas the Seller owns all outstanding shares in Startskottet 21986 AB,
556624-7853, "the Company"; and

Whereas the shareholder's equity of the Company amounts to 100 000 Swedish
Kronor represented by 1 000 shares at 100 Swedish Kronor each.


1. TRANSFER

   The Seller hereby transfers 1 000 shares in the Company to the Buyer.


2. CONSIDERATION

   The consideration for the shares amounts to 1 Swedish Krona. By signing this
   Agreement, the Seller aknowledges receipt of the consideration for the
   shares.


3. DATE OF ACCESS

   The Buyer gains access to the shares on December 11, 2002.


4. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

   The Buyer shall negotiate a technical assistance agreement with Seller for
   such technical assistance formerly provided by the Company as Buyer shall
   continue to require.

5. BOOKKEEPING

   The Seller undertakes to ensure that the bookkeeping of the Company is up to
   date at the time of the transfer.


<PAGE>



6. LITIGATION

   Litigation arising out of this agreement shall be resolved by Skiljeman in
   accordance with the law on Skiljeforfarande.

                                   ----------



This Agreement has been drawn up in two originals out of which each party has
taken one.

                                        Stockholm, December 10, 2002



 /s/ Carl Johan Tornell
-------------------------               ---------------------------
CellPoint Inc.                          CellFree AB
<PAGE>
                                                                Exhibit 10.18(b)


         AMENDMENT made the 5th day of June, 2002, to the employment agreement
(the "Employment Agreement") dated as of January 23, 2001 by and between U.S.
Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, with its principal office at 777 S.
Flagler Drive, Suite, 1108, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 ("USI") and Allan D.
Weingarten (the "Executive").

                                  WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, USI and the Executive have previously entered into the
Employment Agreement; and

         WHEREAS, USI and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement
effective June 5, 2002 (the "Effective Date").


         NOW, THEREFORE, effective on the Effective Date, the parties hereto
agree that Section 7(a)(vii) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended in
its entirety to read as follows:

         "(vii) the retirement of Executive by the Company at or after his
         sixty-seventh birthday."


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, USI has caused this Amendment to be executed by its
duly authorized officers and the Executive has hereunto set his hand as of the
date first above written.

         U.S. INDUSTRIES, INC.



         By: /s/ Dorothy E. Sander
             -------------------------------------
             Dorothy E. Sander
             Senior Vice President



                                       /s/ Allan D. Weingarten
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Allan D. Weingarten
                                       ("Executive")
### §46f. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §203(18)(A), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1727

Section, acts June 23, 1949, ch. 238, §1, 63 Stat. 264; May 29, 1951, ch. 117, §1, 65 Stat. 47; Mar. 10, 1953, ch. 6, §1, 67 Stat. 5; Feb. 27, 1956, ch. 74, §1, 70 Stat. 31; Sept. 21, 1959, Pub. L. 86–340, §1, 73 Stat. 605, related to telephone, telegraph, and radiotelegraph allowances for Representatives, Delegates, and Resident Commissioner.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-02-0096 - Direct Final Rule on Electronic Maintenance and Submission of Information

Accession Number: ML013060452

Date Released: Tuesday, July 23, 2002

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML013060469 - SECY-02-0096 - Direct Final Rule on Electronic Maintenance and Submission of Information (7 page(s), 6/4/2002)
    - ML013060500 - SECY-02-0096Atch1 - Electronic Information Exchange, Direct Final Rule (109 page(s), 6/4/2002)
    - ML013060527 - SECY-02-0096Atch2 -  Electronic Information Exchange, Companion Proposed Rule (3 page(s), 6/4/2002)
    - ML013060561 - SECY-02-0096Atch3 -  Electronic Information Exchange Accompanying Guidance Document (20 page(s), 6/4/2002)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 148.75 Persons ineligible for exemption on termination of assignment. ( a ) *Persons returning from temporary assignment.* No person, or member of his family, shall be allowed free entry of personal and household effects under subheading 9805.00.50, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) (19 U.S.C. 1202), where the person returns to the United States pursuant to Government orders or instructions which authorized him initially to proceed to a foreign post or station and return to the United States upon termination of temporary duty, except as it may otherwise be deemed proper in accordance with the provisions of § 148.74(d) or § 148.76.
( b ) *Persons returning on leave or before termination of extended duty assignment.* A person returning on leave, other than on reemployment leave at the termination of assignment to extended duty as defined in § 148.74(d), or otherwise returning before the termination of an assignment to extended duty outside the Customs territory of the United States, with or without orders covering the return, is not eligible for an exemption under subheading 9805.00.50, HTSUS (19 U.S.C. 1202).
( c ) *Person returning on temporary duty assignment.* A person returning to the United States under orders on temporary duty assignment at the termination of which he is returned to his duty station abroad to resume his regular duties is not regarded as returning to the United States at the termination of extended duty outside the Customs territory of the United States and is not eligible for an exemption under subheading 9805.00.50, HTSUS (19 U.S.C. 1202).
[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51266, Dec. 21, 1988]
Editorial Note on Part 181
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 181 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93026, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 181.46 Time and place for filing drawback claim. ( a ) *Time of filing.* A drawback claim under this subpart shall be filed or applied for, as applicable, within 3 years after the date of exportation of the goods on which drawback is claimed. No extension will be granted unless it is established that a Customs officer was responsible for the untimely filing. Drawback shall be allowed only if the completed good is exported within 5 years after importation of the merchandise identified or designated to support the claim. A good subject to a claim for same condition drawback must be exported before the close of the 3-year period beginning on the date of importation of the good into the United States.
( b ) *Place of filing.* A drawback claim must be filed at the drawback office(s) where the manufacturing drawback contract is on file, whether a general rate or specific rate, but exportation need not occur from that port. To facilitate expedited processing of claims, claimants should file same condition drawback claims in the port where the examination would take place (see § 190.35 or § 191.35 of this chapter, as appropriate). Customs must be notified at least 2 working days in advance of the intended date of exportation in order to have the opportunity to examine the goods.
[T.D. 95-68, 60 FR 46364, Sept. 6, 1995, as amended by T.D. 98-16, 63 FR 11005, Mar. 5, 1998; USCBP-2018-0029, 83 FR 64996, Dec. 18, 2018]
§ 115.66 Examination, inspection, and testing. ( a ) Before the issuance of a certificate of approval by design type, the Certifying Authority shall: ( 1 ) Make a physical examination of one or more vehicles of the production series concerned;
( 2 ) Assure itself as to the adequacy of the manufacturer's system to control quality of materials used, manufacturing methods, and finished road vehicles; and
( 3 ) Require the manufacturer to make available to the Certifying Authority records of materials, including affidavits furnished by suppliers.
( b ) The Certifying Authority shall conduct such examinations, inspections, and testing of the production run road vehicles as it deems necessary.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-99-27 April 23, 1999

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH CONSUMERS ENERGY OFFICIALS

TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE AT PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet Wednesday, April 28, with

Consumers Energy Company officials to discuss the recent Plant Performance Review of the

Palisades Nuclear Power Station. The plant is located near Covert, Michigan.

The meeting will be at 2 p.m. (EST) in the Training Building at the Palisades plant,

27780 Blue Star Memorial Highway, Covert. The meeting is open to public observation. NRC

officials will be available after the meeting for questions and comments from members of the

public and the news media.

In a March 26 letter to Consumers Energy Company, which operates the plant, Geoffrey

Grant, Division Director in the NRC's Region III Office, said, "Overall, performance at Palisades

was acceptable. The plant continued to be operated in a deliberate and conservative manner

even though the plant staff was frequently challenged by equipment problems."

The text of the plant performance review letter is available from the NRC Region III

Office of Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr/255ppr1.htm.

The review covered the time period from January 1997 through January 31.

NRC reviews safety performance twice a year at every licensed nuclear power plant in

the nation. These reviews give the agency staff an integrated assessment of plant performance

and provide a basis for planning inspection activities.

Plant performance reviews are an interim measure NRC is using to monitor nuclear

power plant safety. The agency began using it for this purpose after suspending the

Systematic Assessment of License Performance (SALP) process until a new assessment

program is developed. Previously, SALP reports were issued every 12 to 24 months.

The new reactor oversight and assessment program being developed will provide

quarterly performance reports, based on a number of performance indicators and on inspection

findings. This program will be tested at nine plants beginning in June and will be extended to all

plants next January. A full description of the new program is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

#####
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         101,606
<SECURITIES>                                 1,589,601
<RECEIVABLES>                                  223,839
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,563,818
<PP&E>                                         680,835
<DEPRECIATION>                                 279,141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,156,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          357,681
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           408
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,942,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,156,674
<SALES>                                        577,158
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               577,158
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,584,113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,006,955)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,006,955)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,006,955)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,006,955)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.049)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.049)
        

</TABLE>
### §4577. Availability of appropriations during first three months of any fiscal year for aggregate of payments of gross compensation made to employees from Senate appropriation account for "Salaries, Officers and Employees"

At no time during the first three months of any fiscal year (commencing with the fiscal year which begins October 1, 1984) shall the aggregate of payments of gross compensation made to employees out of any line item appropriation within the Senate appropriation account for "Salaries, Officers and Employees" (other than the line item appropriations, within such account for "Administrative, clerical, and legislative assistance to Senators" and for "Agency contributions") exceed twenty-five per centum of the total amount available for such line item appropriations for such fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 98–367, title I, §4, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 475.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 61–1b of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Congressional Operations Appropriation Act, 1985, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1985.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-6 January 14, 1999

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC MONITORING UNUSUAL EVENT AT FITZPATRICK PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is monitoring the situation at the James

A. Fitzpatrick nuclear power plant at Scriba, N.Y., where a fire broke out about 1 p.m.

today in a hydrogen storage area on the plant grounds.

The event did not affect safety systems. There were no radiation releases, and

the plant is continuing to operate near full power.

The storage area is located several hundred feet away from the reactor building.

The hydrogen, in compressed gas form, is stored in cylinders.

As a result of the fire, the plant’s operator, the New York Power Authority,

declared an “unusual event” at 1:13 p.m. An unusual event is the lowest of four

emergency classifications used by the NRC. Two neighboring nuclear power plants,

Nine Mile Point Units 1 and 2, also declared an unusual event, at 1:47 p.m., after

several support buildings at those facilities were evacuated as a precaution.

At 2:05 p.m., the fire was brought under control when flames were extinguished.

Firefighters are continuing to spray the tanks to prevent the blaze from reigniting. Plant

operators plan to vent hydrogen that remains in the tanks to assure that the situation

remains under control.

NRC is monitoring the utility’s response to the incident, utilizing resident

inspectors assigned to the Fitzpatrick plant and those who have been sent there from

the Nine Mile Point plants. The agency activated its incident response center at the

NRC Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa., and is following developments from its

operations center at NRC headquarters in Rockville, Md.

#
NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT

         This AGREEMENT made this 30th day of June, 2000,

                             BETWEEN

                         PRINT DATA CORP.
  the Corporation, having its principal offices at 43 Brunswick
  Avenue, Hopelawn, New Jersey, Hereinafter referred to as the
  "Company";
                               AND
                         WILLIAM DOEHLER

  residing at 21 Southside Ave, Atlantic Highlands, NJ, hereinafter
  referred to as "Doehler".

       WHEREAS, William Doehler proposes to terminate his
  employment with Print Data Corp. and the parties hereto wish to
  enter into a Non-Competition Agreement, it is therefore agreed as
  follows:

       1.   Doehler agrees that for a period of ten (10) years
  from the date hereof, he shall not in any way contact, solicit,
  or sell to any of the existing clients of Print Data Corp.  This
  Agreement shall mean that he may not, through himself, any
  corporation he may be affiliated with, any agent or in any other
  way deal with the customers of Print Data Corp.

       2.   In consideration thereof, the Company hereby agrees to
  pay to Doehler, the sum of Four hundred and sixty thousand
  dollars ($460,000.00) payable by semi-annual payments of Twenty-
  three thousand dollars ($23,000.00), the first payment being due
  on December 31, 2000 and for nineteen (19) additional payments
  thereof, each six (6) month anniversary of said date, until the
  entire balance is due and paid, the last payment due on June 30,
  2010.

                                     PRINT DATA CORP.

     /s/Joel Green                           /s/Jeffrey Green
  ---------------------------        -------------------------------
  As to


     /s/Joel Green                         /s/William Doehler
-----------------------------         -----------------------------
  As to William Doehler                       William Doehler

<PAGE>
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**I, Antonio B. Mon, as Chief Executive Officer of TechnicalOlympic USA, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to myknowledge:     1. the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of theCompany for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the“Report”), filed with the U.S. Securities andExchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     /s/ Antonio B. Mon           Antonio B. Mon *Chief Executive Officer*Date: March 10, 2005
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification**I, Peter S. Atkinson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s latest fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.May 4, 2007     /s/ Peter S. Atkinson     Peter S. Atkinson  Chief Financial Officer
### SUBCHAPTER IV—CHAPLAIN
EXHIBIT 8.1

Novamerican
Steel Inc. Subsidiaries

|Name                                  |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation 
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|156499 Canada Inc.                    |  | Canada                        
|American Steel & Aluminum Corporation |  | Massachusetts                 
|Argo Steel Ltd.                       |  | Québec                        
|Cresswell Roll Forming Ltd.           |  | Canada                        
|Delta Tube and Company, Limited       |  | Québec (limited partnership)  
|Integrated Steel Industries, Inc.     |  | Delaware                      
|Novamerican Tube Holdings, Inc.       |  | Delaware                      
|Nova Steel Ltd.                       |  | Québec                        
|Nova Steel Processing Centre Ltd.     |  | Canada                        
|Nova Tube and Steel, Inc.             |  | Delaware                      
|Nova Tube Inc.                        |  | Québec                        
|Nova Tube Indiana, LLC                |  | Delaware (limited partnership)
|Nova Tube Ontario Inc.                |  | Canada                        

---