```

[House Report 106-1035]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                           Rept. 106-1035
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                      Part 1
_______________________________________________________________________

                                     

                   NUCLEAR SECRETS SAFETY ACT OF 2000

                               __________

                              R E P O R T

                                 OF THE

                      COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES

                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                                   ON

                               H.R. 4737

      [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office]

                                     

                                     

 December 15, 2000.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on 
            the State of the Union and ordered to be printed

                               __________

                    U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
89-006                     WASHINGTON : 2000

                   HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES
                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

               FLOYD D. SPENCE, South Carolina, Chairman
BOB STUMP, Arizona                   IKE SKELTON, Missouri
DUNCAN HUNTER, California            NORMAN SISISKY, Virginia
JOHN R. KASICH, Ohio                 JOHN M. SPRATT, Jr., South 
HERBERT H. BATEMAN, Virginia             Carolina
JAMES V. HANSEN, Utah                SOLOMON P. ORTIZ, Texas
CURT WELDON, Pennsylvania            OWEN PICKETT, Virginia
JOEL HEFLEY, Colorado                LANE EVANS, Illinois
JIM SAXTON, New Jersey               GENE TAYLOR, Mississippi
STEVE BUYER, Indiana                 NEIL ABERCROMBIE, Hawaii
TILLIE K. FOWLER, Florida            MARTIN T. MEEHAN, Massachusetts
JOHN M. McHUGH, New York             ROBERT A. UNDERWOOD, Guam
JAMES TALENT, Missouri               PATRICK J. KENNEDY, Rhode Island
TERRY EVERETT, Alabama               ROD R. BLAGOJEVICH, Illinois
ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, Maryland         SILVESTRE REYES, Texas
HOWARD ``BUCK'' McKEON, California   TOM ALLEN, Maine
J.C. WATTS, Jr., Oklahoma            VIC SNYDER, Arkansas
MAC THORNBERRY, Texas                JIM TURNER, Texas
JOHN N. HOSTETTLER, Indiana          ADAM SMITH, Washington
SAXBY CHAMBLISS, Georgia             LORETTA SANCHEZ, California
VAN HILLEARY, Tennessee              JAMES H. MALONEY, Connecticut
JOE SCARBOROUGH, Florida             MIKE McINTYRE, North Carolina
WALTER B. JONES, Jr., North          CIRO D. RODRIGUEZ, Texas
    Carolina                         CYNTHIA A. McKINNEY, Georgia
LINDSEY GRAHAM, South Carolina       ELLEN O. TAUSCHER, California
JIM RYUN, Kansas                     ROBERT BRADY, Pennsylvania
BOB RILEY, Alabama                   ROBERT E. ANDREWS, New Jersey
JIM GIBBONS, Nevada                  BARON P. HILL, Indiana
MARY BONO, California                MIKE THOMPSON, California
JOSEPH PITTS, Pennsylvania           JOHN B. LARSON, Connecticut
ROBIN HAYES, North Carolina
STEVEN KUYKENDALL, California
DONALD SHERWOOD, Pennsylvania

                    Robert S. Rangel, Staff Director

                            C O N T E N T S

                              ----------                              
                                                                   Page

Purpose and Background...........................................     2
Legislative History..............................................     4
Section-by-Section Analysis......................................     4
  Section 1--Short Title.........................................     4
  Section 2--Inventory of Restricted Data at National Security 
    Laboratories.................................................     4
  Section 3--Increased Security for Vaults at National Security 
    Laboratories.................................................     4
  Section 4--Use of Electronic Locks for Classified Areas and 
    Classified Information of National Security Administration...     5
Committee Position...............................................     5
Fiscal Data......................................................     5
  Congressional Budget Office Estimate...........................     5
  Committee Cost Estimate........................................     7
Oversight Findings...............................................     7
Constitutional Authority Statement...............................     7
Statement of Federal Mandates....................................     7
Record Vote......................................................     7
Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported............     9
106th Congress                                           Rept. 106-1035
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                      Part 1

======================================================================

 
                   NUCLEAR SECRETS SAFETY ACT OF 2000

                                _______
                                

               December 15, 2000.--Ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Spence, from the Committee on Armed Services, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                        [To accompany H.R. 4737]

      [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office]

    The Committee on Armed Services, to whom was referred the 
bill (H.R. 4737) to require an inventory of documents and 
devices containing Restricted Data at the national security 
laboratories of the Department of Energy, to improve security 
procedures for access to the vaults containing Restricted Data 
at those laboratories, and for other purposes, having 
considered the same, report favorably thereon with amendments 
and recommend that the bill as amended do pass.
    The amendments are as follows:
    Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert in lieu 
thereof the following:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nuclear Secrets Safety Act of 
2000''.

SEC. 2. INVENTORY OF RESTRICTED DATA AT NATIONAL SECURITY LABORATORIES.

    (a) Inventory Required.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall 
conduct an inventory of each document or device at each national 
security laboratory that contains Restricted Data and shall submit to 
the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on 
Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report containing the 
results of that inventory.
    (b) Definitions.--For purposes of this section:
          (1) The term ``national security laboratory'' has the meaning 
        given such term in section 3281 of the National Nuclear 
        Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2471).
          (2) The term ``Restricted Data'' has the meaning given such 
        term in paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 11 y. of the Atomic 
        Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2014(y)).

SEC. 3. INCREASED SECURITY FOR VAULTS AT NATIONAL SECURITY 
                    LABORATORIES.

  (a) Access to Vaults.--(1) Section 3234 of the National Nuclear 
Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2424) is amended--
          (A) by striking ``The Administrator'' and inserting ``(a) 
        Procedures Required.--The Administrator''; and
          (B) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
  ``(b) Access to Vaults at National Security Laboratories.--With 
respect to any vault containing Restricted Data at any national 
security laboratory, the procedures shall, at a minimum, provide that 
an individual shall not have unrestricted access to any such vault 
except in accordance with the following requirements:
          ``(1) Before each such access, the identity of the individual 
        is verified by--
                  ``(A) an attendant through direct visual observation;
                  ``(B) biometric technology; or
                  ``(C) other means providing a high confidence level 
                in verifying the identity of the individual.
          ``(2) For each such access, a permanent record of such access 
        is maintained.
  ``(c) Change of Lock Combinations to Vaults at National Security 
Laboratories.--The Administrator shall ensure, for each vault 
containing Restricted Data at each national security laboratory, that 
the combination of each lock to such vault is changed not later than--
          ``(1) one week after each removal of an individual from the 
        list of individuals permitted access to such vault; and
          ``(2) 12 months after the date on which the combination was 
        last changed.''.
  (2) The requirements of subsection (b) of section 3234 of such Act 
(as added by paragraph (1)) shall apply to each access referred to in 
that subsection that occurs after the expiration of the 24-hour period 
beginning upon the enactment of this Act.
  (3) The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall ensure, for each 
vault containing Restricted Data at each national security laboratory, 
that the combination of each lock to such vault is changed not later 
than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
  (b) Report on NNSA Polygraph Policy.--(1) Not later than 90 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for 
Nuclear Security shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the 
Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of 
Representatives a report on the policy recommendations of the 
Adminstrator regarding the use of counterintelligence polygraph 
examinations within the National Nuclear Security Administration. The 
report shall contain the recommendations of the Administrator as to 
what the policy of the Administration should be regarding--
          (A) the use of such examinations generally as a prerequisite 
        to access (restricted or unrestricted) to Restricted Data; and
          (B) the use of such examinations as a prerequisite to access 
        (restricted or unrestricted) to vaults containing Restricted 
        Data.
  (2) For purposes of this section, the term ``Restricted Data'' has 
the meaning given such term in paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 11 y. 
of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2014(y)).

SEC. 4. USE OF ELECTRONIC LOCKS FOR CLASSIFIED AREAS AND CLASSIFIED 
                    INFORMATION OF NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY 
                    ADMINISTRATION.

  Section 3234 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 
U.S.C. 2424), as amended by section 3 of this Act, is further amended 
by adding at the end the following new subsection:
  ``(d) Electronic Locks Required.--The Administrator shall ensure 
that, after October 1, 2002, each lock used by the Administration to 
secure any vault, safe, or other container used to store Restricted 
Data is an electronic lock that meets or exceeds the FF-L-2740A lock 
standard of the General Services Administration, as in effect on the 
date of the enactment of the Nuclear Secrets Safety Act of 2000.''.
Amend the title so as to read:

    A bill to require an inventory of documents and devices containing 
Restricted Data at the national security laboratories of the National 
Nuclear Security Administration, to improve security procedures for 
access to the vaults containing Restricted Data at those laboratories, 
and for other purposes.

                         Purpose and Background

    The purpose of H.R. 4737 is to enhance security controls 
over the handling of classified nuclear weapons information at 
the national security laboratories of the National Nuclear 
Security Administration (NNSA) of the Department of Energy 
(DOE). As amended by the committee, the bill would require the 
Administrator for Nuclear Security to conduct an inventory of 
each document or device containing classified nuclear weapons 
information and to assess the use of polygraphic examinations 
as a prerequisite to access to such information. H.R. 4737 
would also specify the procedures required to gain access to 
document storage vaults at the national security laboratories 
and would establish minimum standards for electronic locks for 
use in the safeguarding of classified nuclear weapons 
information.
    On June 9, 2000, the Committee on Armed Services was 
notified by the Department of Energy that two computer hard 
drives containing classified Restricted Data were missing from 
a classified document storage vault located in the weapons 
design ``X Division'' at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. 
The committee notes that Restricted Data is classified 
information concerning the development, design, manufacture, 
and use of nuclear weapons. The committee further notes that 
such information can only be accessed by individuals with 
specific and appropriate security clearances.
    The hard drives were designed for use with a portable 
computer by the Nuclear Emergency Search Team (NEST) for 
emergency deployments to locate and disarm lost nuclear devices 
of the United States or other nations, or to disarm potential 
terrorist-produced nuclear devices. The hard drive contained 
classified nuclear weapon information to aid the NEST team in 
these emergency situations. The Department of Energy and the 
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) conducted searches to 
locate the hard drives and to determine which laboratory staff 
members had access to the devices. The FBI also began to 
administer polygraphic examinations to members of the NEST team 
to determine the disposition of the hard drives.
    On June 14, 2000 the Committee on Armed Services held a 
hearing to examine the security failure at Los Alamos National 
Laboratory and to assess security policies and procedures of 
the national security laboratories in the handling of 
classified nuclear weapons information. The committee 
determined that 26 members of the NEST team had unrestricted, 
24-hour access to the document storage vault where the hard 
drives and their computers were stored. Information supplied by 
the Department of Energy indicated that the hard drives could 
be removed by cleared individuals without a ``sign out'' 
because the hard drives were classified as Secret-level 
Restricted Data and that existing DOE security policies and 
procedures did not require specific accountability over 
individual Secret-level documents or devices, including for 
those documents or devices containing Restricted Data relating 
to nuclear weapons. As a result of these security policies and 
procedures, there was no record of when, or by whom, the hard 
drives were removed from the classified storage vaults. In 
addition, the committee further determined that Secret-level 
Restricted Data held by the Department of Energy is not subject 
to regular inventory procedures and that changes in lock 
combinations and other routine security procedures for the 
handling of classified information had not been effectively 
implemented.
    Notwithstanding the recovery of the two hard drives by 
staff of the Department of Energy from behind a photocopier 
within the ``X Division'' on June 16, 2000, the committee 
believes that significant enhancements of basic security 
policies and procedures in the handling of classified nuclear 
weapons information by the Department of Energy is warranted.

                          Legislative History

    H.R. 4737 was introduced on June 23, 2000 and referred to 
the Committee on Armed Services.
    On June 28, 2000, the Committee held a markup session to 
consider H.R. 4737. The committee adopted an amendment in the 
nature of a substitute by a voice vote. The amended version of 
the bill was reported favorably by a voice vote.

                      Section-by-Section Analysis

    The following is a section-by-section analysis of the 
amendment in the nature of a substitute adopted by the 
committee.

                         SECTION 1--SHORT TITLE

    This section would cite the Act as the ``Nuclear Secrets 
Safety Act of 2000.''

     SECTION 2--INVENTORY OF RESTRICTED DATA AT NATIONAL SECURITY 
                              LABORATORIES

    This section would require the Administrator for Nuclear 
Security to conduct an inventory of each document or device at 
each national security laboratory that contains Restricted Data 
not later than ninety days after the date of enactment of this 
Act. This section would also require the Administrator to 
submit a report containing the results of that inventory to the 
Senate Armed Services Committee and the House Armed Services 
Committee.

     SECTION 3--INCREASED SECURITY FOR VAULTS AT NATIONAL SECURITY 
                              LABORATORIES

    This section would amend section 2424 of title 50, United 
States Code, to require the Administrator for Nuclear Security 
to ensure that procedures governing access to any vault 
containing Restricted Data at any national security laboratory 
shall require that the identity of an individual with 
unrestricted access to any such vault be verified by an 
attendant through direct visual observation, biometric 
technology, or other means that would provide a high confidence 
level in verifying the identity of the individual and thata 
permanent record of such access be maintained. This section would also 
require the Administrator to ensure that changes of lock combinations 
to vaults at national security laboratories are changed within certain 
specified time limits. This section would further require the 
Administrator to assess the use of polygraphic examinations as a 
prerequisite to restricted or unrestricted access to Restricted Data or 
vaults containing such data. The Administrator shall submit his report, 
and any recommendation, to the Senate Armed Services Committee and the 
House Armed Services Committee not later than ninety days after the 
date of enactment of this Act.

SECTION 4--USE OF ELECTRONIC LOCKS FOR CLASSIFIED AREAS AND CLASSIFIED 
        INFORMATION OF NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

    This section would amend section 2424 of title 50, United 
States Code, to require the Administrator for Nuclear Security 
to ensure that, after October 1, 2002, each lock used by the 
National Nuclear Security Administration to secure any vault, 
safe, or other container used to store Restricted Data is an 
electronic lock that meets or exceeds certain specified lock 
standards of the General Services Administration.

                           Committee Position

    On June 28, 2000, the Committee on Armed Services, a quorum 
being present, approved H.R. 4737, as amended, by a voice vote.

                              Fiscal Data

    Pursuant to clause 3(d)(2)(A) of rule XIII of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives, the committee attempted to 
ascertain annual outlays resulting from the bill during fiscal 
year 2001 and the four following fiscal years. The results of 
such efforts are reflected in the cost estimate prepared by the 
Director of the Congressional Budget Office under section 402 
of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, which is included in 
this report pursuant to clause 3(c)(3) of rule XIII of the 
Rules of the House.

                  CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE ESTIMATE

    In compliance with clause 3(c)(3) of rule XIII of the Rules 
of the House of Representatives, the cost estimate prepared by 
the Congressional Budget Office and submitted pursuant to 
section 402(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 is as 
follows:

                                     U.S. Congress,
                               Congressional Budget Office,
                                     Washington, DC, July 10, 2000.
Hon. Floyd Spence,
Chairman, Committee on Armed Services,
House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Chairman: The Congressional Budget Office has 
prepared the enclosed cost estimate for H.R. 4737, the Nuclear 
Secrets Safety Act.
    If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be 
pleased to provide them. The CBO staff contact is Matthew A. 
Schmit.
            Sincerely,
                                          Dan L. Crippen, Director.

H.R. 4737--Nuclear Secrets Safety Act

    H.R. 4737 would require the Department of Energy to take an 
inventory of all restricted material at its national security 
laboratories (Los Alamos, Sandia, and Lawrence Livermore) and 
would require measures to further control access to this 
material. These measures include biological identification 
devices for restricted vaults and electronic locks for all 
safes. CBO estimates that implementing the bill would cost 
about $28 million over the 2001-2003 period, assuming 
appropriation of the necessary funds. Because H.R. 4737 would 
not affect direct spending or receipts, pay-as-you-go 
procedures would not apply.
    H.R. 4737 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector 
mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA). 
Public universities that contract with the National Nuclear 
Security Administration (NNSA) would incur additional costs as 
a result of this legislation, but those costs would be covered 
through their contractual agreements with the federal 
government.
    Estimated cost to the Federal Government: The estimated 
budgetary impact of H.R. 4737 is shown in the following table. 
The costs of this legislation fall within budget function 050 
(national defense).
    Basis of estimate: CBO estimates that implementing H.R. 
4737 would cost $28 million, assuming appropriation of the 
necessary amounts. Of that total, $25 million would stem from 
the inventory of restricted material and $3 million would 
result from the purchase and installation of biological 
identification devices on restricted vaults. CBO estimates no 
incremental cost from installing electronic locks because that 
is being done under current law.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   By fiscal year, in millions of dollars
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                                                              2000     2001     2002     2003     2004     2005
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        SPENDING SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION

Spending under current law for NNSA weapons activities:
    Estimated authorization level \1\.....................    4,427    4,427    4,427    4,427    4,427    4,427
    Estimated outlays.....................................    4,250    4,506    4,427    4,427    4,427    4,427
Proposed changes:
    Estimated authorization level.........................        0       28        0        0        0        0
    Estimated outlays.....................................        0       18        9        1        0        0
Spending under H.R. 4737 for NNSA weapons activities:
    Estimated authorization level.........................    4,427    4,455    4,427    4,427    4,427    4,427
    Estimated outlays.....................................    4,250    4,524    4,436    4,428    4,427   4,427
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The 2000 level is the amount appropriated for that year. The current-law amounts for 2001 through 2005
  assume that appropriations remain at the 2000 level. If they are adjusted for inflation the base amounts would
  rise by about $110 million a year, but the estimated changes would remain as shown under ``Proposed Changes.''

    The estimated cost of taking an inventory of restricted 
material is based on information from the three national 
security laboratories. An inventory of this scope is not a 
routine procedure at the national security laboratories, and 
extra personnel would be required to complete it. The inventory 
would cover approximately 8.5 million documents in 4,300 
repositories. Information from the labs indicate that costs 
would range from $4,500 to $8,000 to inventory each repository. 
CBO assumes the average cost per repository would be about 
$6,000.
    CBO expects that installing biological identification 
devices on restricted vaults would cost--on average--
approximately $5,000 per vault, based on information from the 
laboratories and the General Services Administration. This cost 
might vary widely depending on the need for integration into 
existing security systems and the total size of the network. 
CBO expects that such devices would be installed on about 540 
vaults.
    Pay-as-you-go considerations: None.
    Intergovernmental and private-sector impact: H.R. 4737 
contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as 
defined in UMRA. Public universities that contract with the 
NNSA would incur additional costs as a result of this 
legislation, but those costs would be covered through their 
contractual agreements with the federal government.
    Estimate prepared by: Federal costs: Matthew A. Schmit. 
Impact on State, local, and tribal governments: Leo Lex. Impact 
on the private sector: R. William Thomas.
    Estimate approved by: Peter H. Fontaine, Deputy Assistant 
Director for Budget Analysis.

                        COMMITTEE COST ESTIMATE

    Pursuant to clause 3(d) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives, the committee generally concurs with 
the estimate contained in the report of the Congressional 
Budget Office.

                           Oversight Findings

    With respect to clause 3(c)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives, this legislation results from 
hearings and other oversight activities conducted by the 
committee pursuant to clause 2(b)(1) of rule X.
    With respect to clause 3(c)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives and section 308(a)(1) of the 
Congressional Budget Act of 1974, this legislation does not 
include any new spending or credit authority, nor does it 
provide for any increase or decrease in tax revenues or 
expenditures. The fiscal features of this legislation are 
addressed in the estimate prepared by the Director of the 
Congressional Budget Office under section 402 of the 
Congressional Budget Act of 1974.
    With respect to clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives, the committee has not received a 
report from the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight 
pertaining to the subject matter of H.R. 4737.

                   Constitutional Authority Statement

    Pursuant to clause 3(d)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives, the committee finds the authority for 
this legislation in Article I, section 8 of the United States 
Constitution.

                     Statement of Federal Mandates

    Pursuant to section 423 of Public Law 104-4, this 
legislation contains no Federal mandates with respect to state, 
local, and tribal governments, nor with respect to the private 
sector. Similarly, the bill provides no unfunded Federal 
intergovernmental mandates.

                              Record Vote

    In accordance with clause 3(b) of rule XIII of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives, a record vote was taken with 
respect to the committee's consideration of an amendment 
offered by Mr. Abercrombie. The record of this vote can be 
found on the following page.
    The committee ordered H.R. 4737, as amended, reported to 
the House with a favorable recommendation by a voice vote, a 
quorum being present.

         Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported

  In compliance with clause 3(e) of rule XIII of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives, changes in existing law made by 
the bill, as reported, are shown as follows (existing law 
proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new 
matter is printed in italic, existing law in which no change is 
proposed is shown in roman):

    SECTION 3234 OF THE NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ACT

SEC. 3234. PROCEDURES RELATING TO ACCESS BY INDIVIDUALS TO CLASSIFIED 
                    AREAS AND INFORMATION OF ADMINISTRATION.

  [The Administrator] (a) Procedures Required.--The 
Administrator shall establish appropriate procedures to ensure 
that any individual is not permitted unescorted access to any 
classified area, or access to classified information, of the 
Administration until that individual has been verified to hold 
the appropriate security clearances.
  (b) Access to Vaults at National Security Laboratories.--With 
respect to any vault containing Restricted Data at any national 
security laboratory, the procedures shall, at a minimum, 
provide that an individual shall not have unrestricted access 
to any such vault except in accordance with the following 
requirements:
          (1) Before each such access, the identity of the 
        individual is verified by--
                  (A) an attendant through direct visual 
                observation;
                  (B) biometric technology; or
                  (C) other means providing a high confidence 
                level in verifying the identity of the 
                individual.
          (2) For each such access, a permanent record of such 
        access is maintained.
  (c) Change of Lock Combinations to Vaults at National 
Security Laboratories.--The Administrator shall ensure, for 
each vault containing Restricted Data at each national security 
laboratory, that the combination of each lock to such vault is 
changed not later than--
          (1) one week after each removal of an individual from 
        the list of individuals permitted access to such vault; 
        and
          (2) 12 months after the date on which the combination 
        was last changed.
  (d) Electronic Locks Required.--The Administrator shall 
ensure that, after October 1, 2002, each lock used by the 
Administration to secure any vault, safe, or other container 
used to store Restricted Data is an electronic lock that meets 
or exceeds the FF-L-2740A lock standard of the General Services 
Administration, as in effect on the date of the enactment of 
the Nuclear Secrets Safety Act of 2000.

                                  

```