alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 756 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 756

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to ensure that 
 preexisting condition exclusions with respect to enrollment in health 
  insurance coverage and group health plans continue to be prohibited.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 16, 2021

  Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to ensure that 
 preexisting condition exclusions with respect to enrollment in health 
  insurance coverage and group health plans continue to be prohibited.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Continuing Coverage for Preexisting 
Conditions Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. ENSURING THE PROHIBITION OF PREEXISTING CONDITION EXCLUSIONS 
              WITH RESPECT TO ENROLLMENT IN HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE 
              AND GROUP HEALTH PLANS.

    Part I of subtitle F of title I of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148) is amended by adding at the 
end the following section:

``SEC. 1503. SEVERABILITY.

    ``If subsection (a) of section 5000A of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986, as added by section 1501(b), is to any extent illegal, 
unconstitutional, otherwise invalid, or incapable of being enforced, 
the validity and enforceability of sections 2701 through 2705 of the 
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg through 300gg-4), as added 
by section 1201, shall not be affected.''.
                                 <all>
```
### §190. Repealed. S. Res. 4, §301(b), Feb. 4, 1977

Section, act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title I, §137, 60 Stat. 832, directed that controversies arising as to the jurisdiction of any standing committee of the Senate with respect to any proposed legislation be decided by the presiding officer of the Senate in favor of the committee having jurisdiction over the subject matter which predominated in the proposed legislation.
NRC NEWS U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-03-004 March 13, 2003

CONTACT: Victor Dricks E-mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

 

NRC TO MEET WITH NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT TO DISCUSS

 FIRST QUARTERLY INSPECTION FINDINGS AT COOPER NUCLEAR STATION

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Nebraska Public Power

District on Wednesday, March 26, to present the NRC’s findings resulting from the first quarterly

inspection of Cooper Nuclear Station associated with the Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL) issued on

January 30, 2003.

The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 7:00

p.m. at Brownville Concert Hall, Atlantic Avenue and Second Street, Brownville, Neb., 68321. Before

the session is adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the public on results of

the first quarterly inspection of Cooper, the safety performance of the plant, and the role of the NRC in

ensuring safe plant operation.

Since April 2002, Cooper has been in the multiple/degraded cornerstone category of the NRC’s

performance assessment matrix because of problems with its emergency preparedness program. The

CAL describes steps Nebraska Public Power District officials plan to take to improve plant

performance, which are subject to quarterly NRC inspections.

The CAL can be found in the agency's electronic document system (ADAMS), which can be

accessed through the NRC's web site at www.nrc.gov. Help in using ADAMS is available by

contacting the NRC Public Document Room at (301) 415-4737 or 1-800-397-4209. 

###
§ 210.45 Review of initial determinations on matters other than temporary relief. ( a ) *Briefs and oral argument.* In the event the Commission orders review of an initial determination pertaining to issues other than temporary relief, the parties may be requested to file briefs on the issues under review at a time and of a size and nature specified in the notice of review. The parties, within the time provided for filing the review briefs, may submit a written request for a hearing to present oral argument before the Commission, which the Commission in its discretion may grant or deny. The Commission shall grant the request when at least one of the participating Commissioners votes in favor of granting the request.
( b ) *Scope of review.* Only the issues set forth in the notice of review, and all subsidiary issues therein, will be considered by the Commission.
( c ) *Determination on review.* On review, the Commission may affirm, reverse, modify, set aside or remand for further proceedings, in whole or in part, the initial determination of the administrative law judge. In addition, the Commission may take no position on specific issues or portions of the initial determination of the administrative law judge. The Commission also may make any findings or conclusions that in its judgment are proper based on the record in the proceeding. If the Commission's determination on review terminates the investigation in its entirety, a notice will be published in the Federal Register.
[59 FR 39039, Aug. 1, 1994, as amended at 60 FR 53120, Oct. 12, 1995; 73 FR 38235, July 7, 2008]
<PAGE>   1



                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                      NEWMARK HOMES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES


LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
             CORPORATE NAME OF SUBSIDIARY             STATE INCORPORATED            ASSUMED NAME USED
          ---------------------------------           ------------------        -----------------------------
<S>                                                 <C>                         <C>
          Newmark Home Corporation                          Nevada              Fedrick, Harris Estate Homes

          Newmark Finance Corporation                       Texas

          Newmark Finance Affiliate, Ltd.                   Texas

          NHC Homes, Inc.                                   Nevada

          Newmark Homes, L.P.                               Texas               Fedrick, Harris Estate Homes,
                                                                                Newmark Homes,
                                                                                Marksman Homes

          NMH Investments, Inc.                             Nevada

          The Adler Companies, Inc.                         Florida

          Adler Realty Co.                                  Florida

          ADRO Const., Inc.                                 Florida

          TAP Acquisition Co.                               Florida

          Twin Acres Partnership                            Florida

          Pacific United Development Corp.                  Nevada

          PUDC, Inc.                                        Nevada

          Pacific United, L.P.                              Texas

          Silverlake Interests, L.C.                        Texas

          Westbrooke Acquisition Corp.                      Florida

          Westbrooke at Oak Ridge, Inc.                     Florida

          Westbrooke at Pembroke Pines, Inc.                Florida

          Westbrooke at West Lake, Inc.                     Florida

          Westbrooke at Winston Trails, Inc.                Florida

          Westbrooke Communities, Inc.                      Florida

          The Westbrooke Companies, Inc.                    Florida

          The Westbrooke Partnership                        Florida
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employee Benefits Security Administration

Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, the 128th open meeting of the full Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans will be held on Wednesday, November 10, 2004.

The session will take place in Room S-2508, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. The purpose of the open meeting, which will run from 1:30 p.m. to approximately 3:30 p.m., is for the Working Groups to submit their reports for the full Advisory Council's review and acceptance, and for the Council to forward the reports to the Secretary of Labor.

                    Organizations or members of the public wishing to submit a written statement pertaining to the meeting may do so by submitting 20 copies to Larry                           ( print page 62298)                        Good, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory Council, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-5656, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Statements received on or before November 3, 2004, will be included in the record of the meeting. Individuals or representatives of organizations wishing to address the Advisory Council should forward their request to the Executive Secretary at the above address or via telephone at (202) 693-8668. Oral presentations will be limited to 10 minutes, but an extended statement may be submitted for the record. Individuals with disabilities who need special accommodations should contact Larry Good by November 3 at the address indicated in this notice.                

Signed at Washington, DC., this 19th day of October, 2004.

Ann L. Combs,

Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits Security Administration.

[FR Doc. 04-23795 Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

LOWELL A. BAISDEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, 1 in his official 

capacity as Attorney General of the United 

States, et al., 

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 19-3105 (JMC)

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED 

that Defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, ECF 16, is GRANTED, and this 

case is DISMISSED.

The Clerk of Court shall terminate this case.

This is a final appealable Order.

SO ORDERED. 

 __________________________

JIA M. COBB

United States District Judge

Date: November 15, 2023

1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), Merrick B. Garland is automatically substituted for his

predecessor, Jeffrey A. Rosen, Acting Attorney General of the United States.
§ 201.0 Seal. ( a ) Pursuant to section 331(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1331(g)), the United States International Trade Commission has adopted an official seal, the depiction of which follows:
( b ) Custody and certification obligations. The Secretary shall have custody of the seal of the United States International Trade Commission and he, or the Acting Secretary, may execute under seal any certification required to authenticate any books, records, papers, or other documents as true copies of official records of the United States International Trade Commission.
(Sec. 331(g), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1331(g)))
[40 FR 53384, Nov. 18, 1975; 40 FR 55838, Dec. 2, 1975]
<Page>

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective
Amendment No. 24 to the registration statement on Form N-4 (No. 33-19421) of our
report dated February 15, 2002, relating to the financial statements of Fortis
Benefits Insurance Company, which appears in the Statement of Additional
Information constituting part of Post-Effective Amendment No. 22 to such
registration statement. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our
report dated April 6, 2001, relating to the financial statements of Fortis
Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account D, which appears in such Statement
of Additional Information. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Independent Public Accountants" in such Statement of Additional
Information.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 21, 2003
Fourth Meeting of the MV Transformer Working Group

November 30, 2011

Hosted by APPA

Draft Agenda

9:00    Welcome and Introductions

9:15 Discussion of Latest Liquid‐Immersed Analysis Results  

9:45 “Clearing the Air” Conceptual Discussion

 Relationship between LCC and Dollars/Watt metrics

 Loading assumptions

 Sources of assumptions about energy prices, energy demand, load growth, discount

rates  

 Poles vs pads

 

10:45 Break

11:00 Network/vault definition

11:30 BIL rating proposal

12:30   Lunch ‐ Caucuses

2:00   Either MVDT or Liquid Immersed – Proposals/Negotiation

5:00 Adjourn
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 

GROUP, INC. d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________________/

ORDER DENYING NON-PARTY GRAND HOPE INVESTMENTS, INC.’S 

MOTION TO INTERVENE AND MOTION TO SUE RECEIVER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Non-Party Grand Hope Investments, Inc.’s 

(“Grand Hope”) Motion to Intervene and Motion to Sue Receiver [ECF No. 1593] (“Motion to 

Intervene”).

In the Motion to Intervene, Grand Hope requests permission to intervene in this action and 

seek relief from this Court’s Amended Order Appointing Receiver dated August 13, 2020 [ECF 

No. 141] (“Amended Receivership Order”), in the form of lifting the litigation injunction provided 

for in that Order to allow Grand Hope to sue the Receiver, Ryan K. Stumphauzer (“Receiver”),

and non-party, First American Title Insurance Company (“First American”), for breach of contract 

and specific performance in connection with a purported settlement (“Claims”). The Court has 

reviewed the Motion to Intervene, the Receiver’s Response in Opposition to the Motion to 

Intervene [ECF No. 1616], and other pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise fully advised 

in the premises. Accordingly, it is hereby

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1629 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/29/2023 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion to Intervene is DENIED. Grand Hope 

has not demonstrated that its intervention in this matter would be proper, as its pursuit of the Claims 

would be contrary to the “orderly and efficient administration of the estate.” See FTC v. 3R 

Bancorp, No. 04 C 7177, 2005 WL 497784, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 23, 2005) (citing SEC v. Hardy, 

803 F.2d 1034, 1038 (9th Cir. 1986)). The Court is not convinced that Grand Hope could establish

that an enforceable settlement agreement exists between the Receiver, Grand Hope, and First 

American. 

Further, Grand Hope’s Motion to Intervene, including the Complaint it requests leave to 

file against the Receiver, [ECF No. 1593-5], does not allege, much less establish, that the Receiver 

engaged in “malfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or in reckless disregard of [his] duties” as 

required by the terms of the Amended Receivership Order. See [ECF No. 141] ¶ 49. As such, 

Grand Hope is not permitted to pursue claims against the Receivership. Moreover, because Grand 

Hope submitted a Proof of Claim in this Receivership to recover the same purported damages it 

seeks to recover through the Claims, it has “consent[ed] to be bound by the decisions of the Court 

as to the treatment of the Claim in a Court-approved distribution plan.” [ECF No. 1471] at 11. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 29th day of June, 2023.

________________________________

RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1629 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/29/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 207.25 Posthearing briefs.

Any party may file a posthearing brief concerning the information adduced at or after the hearing with the Secretary within a time specified in the notice of scheduling or by the presiding official at the hearing. A posthearing brief shall be filed electronically, and nine (9) true paper copies shall be submitted on the same business day. No such posthearing brief shall exceed fifteen (15) pages of textual material, double-spaced and single-sided, when printed out on paper measuring 8.5 × 11 inches. In addition, the presiding official may permit persons to file answers to questions or requests made by the Commission at the hearing within a specified time. The Secretary shall not accept for filing posthearing briefs or answers which do not comply with this section.

[79 FR 35925, June 25, 2014]
EXHIBIT “A”

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 65-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2021 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

IMPERIAL BRANDS PLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No.: 1:20-cv-23287-DPG 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

UNOPPOSED JOINT MOTION FOR AN ORDER SETTING 

COORDINATED MOTION TO DISMISS PROCEDURE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on Defendants Imperial Brands plc 

(“Imperial”), WPP plc, Young & Rubicam LLC, and BCW LLC’s (collectively, “Moving 

Defendants”) Unopposed Motion for an Order Setting Coordinated Motion to Dismiss Procedure 

and Briefing Schedule (the “Motion”), and good cause appearing therefore, it is ORDERED AND 

ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Parties shall adhere to the following deadlines 

and procedures: 

1. The Moving Defendants’ deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint 

shall be February 26, 2021. 

a. Moving Defendants shall file a Consolidated Motion to Dismiss, making 

arguments common to all Moving Defendants, not to exceed twenty-five (25) 

pages. 

b. While Moving Defendants will work collaboratively to consolidate briefing on 

as many relevant issues as possible, Imperial (individually) and WPP plc, 

Young & Rubicam LLC and BCW LLC (together) shall have the option of 

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 65-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2021 Page 2 of 3
2 

filing separate motions and memoranda of law on their individualized 

arguments as outlined in Moving Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for an Order 

Setting Coordinated Motion to Dismiss Procedure and Briefing Schedule, [D.E. 

65], not to exceed twenty (20) pages each, to address any additional arguments 

that Moving Defendants wish to raise that are not contained in the Consolidated 

Motion arguments, including, but not limited to, particularized arguments 

relating to jurisdiction. 

2. Plaintiffs’ deadline to file a Response to the Consolidated Motion to Dismiss and 

the Individual Briefs set forth in Paragraph 1 above shall be March 26, 2021. Plaintiffs’ Responses 

to such briefing shall not exceed the number of permissible pages of the respective opening briefs: 

twenty-five (25) pages to respond to the Consolidated Motion to Dismiss and twenty (20) pages to 

respond to the Individual Briefs. 

3. Moving Defendants shall be permitted to file Replies to Plaintiffs’ Responses by 

April 16, 2021, as follows: 

a. A Reply in support of the Consolidated Motion to Dismiss, not to exceed fifteen 

(15) pages; and 

b. Replies in support of any Individual Briefs, not to exceed ten (10) pages. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Miami-Dade County, Florida, this 

____ day of ___________, 2021. 

____________________________________ 

HONORABLE DARRIN P. GAYLES

United States District Judge 

Copies furnished via CM/ECF to Counsel of Record 

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 65-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2021 Page 3 of 3
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-98-46 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: NRC-Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)

(404) 562-4416 or 4417

DOE-Jim Guisti (803) 725-2889

MEETING SCHEDULED TO ADDRESS PILOT PROGRAM

FOR NRC OVERSIGHT AT DOE SAVANNAH RIVER PLANT

The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the U.S. Department of Energy have

scheduled a joint public meeting on Thursday, June 25, in Aiken, South Carolina to outline

a pilot program under which the NRC will provide simulated oversight at the Savannah

River Site’s Receiving Basin for offsite fuel. The meeting is open to the public and will

begin at 6:30 p.m. (EDT) at the City of Aiken Conference Center, located in the City

Municipal Building at 215 The Alley, in Aiken.

Major issues to be discussed include the overall pilot program, a draft SRS work plan, and

both generic and site specific issues affecting NRC oversight of DOE facilities.

Savannah River is one of several sites which receive and manage spent fuel from defense

and research reactor programs. In 1964, the Receiving Basin for Offsite Fuels, a waterfilled spent fuel storage basin, received the first of approximately 1,600 casks of spent fuel

from domestic and foreign research reactors. Fuel assemblies are stored in racks or

baskets standing on the bottom of the basins.

The pilot program is authorized by a Memorandum of Understanding signed in November,

1997 by NRC Chairman Shirley Ann Jackson and Energy Secretary Frederico F. Pea.

The memorandum also authorizes pilot programs for simulated NRC oversight at several

other DOE facilities and is considered to be an important step in assessing the desirability

of NRC safety regulations at certain DOE sites.

Full NRC regulation over certain DOE operations would require legislation and funding by

Congress.

The pilot program is the result of a recommendation in December of 1995 by an advisory

committee that DOE nuclear-related facilities be regulated by an external agency. A DOE

working group later recommended that the NRC be the external regulator. During the pilot

phase, which runs through late 1998, the program will use “simulated regulation,” as

defined in the MOU, to test regulatory concepts at DOE facilities by evaluating them

against standards established by the NRC and focus on areas of the greatest safety

significance.

#

EDITORS: A joint NRC/DOE web site has been established for the public to access

information on the pilot program at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/NMSS/doepilot.html