alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-02-044 October 18, 2002

CONTACT: Roger Hannah E-mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

MICHAEL PECK NAMED NRC SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT CALLAWAY

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in the Region IV office in Arlington, Texas, have

selected Michael Peck as the Senior Resident Inspector at the Callaway nuclear power plant in Steedman,

Missouri.

Peck joined the NRC’s Region III (Lisle, IL) office in 1990. He served as the Resident Inspector

at Dresden Station in Morris, Illinois until transferring to the US Department of Energy in 1993. While

at DOE, he served as facility representative at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Richland, Washington.

Peck returned to the agency in 2000. Since returning, Peck has served as the Resident Inspector at the

Columbia Generating Station and worked as a reactor engineer in the Region’s Division of Reactor

Projects. 

Prior to his NRC service, Peck worked as a reactor engineer at the Browns Ferry and Clinton

Nuclear Plants and as a shift technical advisor at the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant. He earned a bachelor of

science degree in chemical engineering and a master of science in nuclear engineering from the University

of Missouri-Columbia. Peck and his family live in Columbia, Missouri.

Every U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve

as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring significant work

projects and writing periodic reports which are available to the public. 

The NRC resident inspectors at Callaway can be reached at 573-676-3181.

###
§ 191.104 Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) certificates. ( a ) *Request.* The drawback claimant or manufacturer must request that the Director, National Revenue Center, TTB, provide the CBP office where the drawback claim will be processed with a tax-paid certificate on TTB Form 5100.4 (Certificate of Tax-Paid Alcohol).
( b ) *Contents.* The request must state the: ( 1 ) Quantity of alcohol in proof gallons;
( 2 ) Serial number of each package;
( 3 ) Amount of tax paid on the alcohol;
( 4 ) Name, registry number, and location of the distilled spirits plant;
( 5 ) Date of withdrawal;
( 6 ) Name of the manufacturer using the alcohol in producing the exported articles;
( 7 ) Address of the manufacturer and its manufacturing plant; and
( 8 ) CBP drawback office where the drawback claim will be processed.
( c ) *Extract of TTB certificate.* If a certification of any portion of the alcohol described in the TTB Form 5100.4 is required for liquidation of drawback entries processed in another drawback office, the drawback office, on written application of the person who requested its issuance, will transmit a copy of the extract from the certificate for use at that drawback office. The drawback office will note that the copy of the extract was prepared and transmitted.
[USCBP-2018-0029, 83 FR 65066, Dec. 18, 2018]]
§ 201.23 Definitions. For the purpose of these regulations: ( a ) The term *individual* means a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence;
( b ) The term *maintain* includes maintain, collect, use, or disseminate;
( c ) The term *record* means any item, collection, or grouping of information about an individual that is maintained by the Commission, including, but not limited to, his or her education, financial transactions, medical history, and criminal or employment history and that contains his or her name, or the identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual;
( d ) The term *system of records* means a group of any records under the control of the Commission from which information is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifying particular assigned to the individual;
( e ) The term *Privacy Act Officer* refers to the Secretary, United States International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, or his or her designee.
[63 FR 29348, May 29, 1998, as amended at 80 FR 39380, July 9, 2015]
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-22-00005-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 297th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 0644657A

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Walker, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

IRA HENRY III, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In March 2021, appellant Ira Henry III filed documents in the trial court that 

seemed to seek a judgment nunc pro tunc “to have this judgment and sentence 

corrected, finding cleri[c]al mistakes in the judgment”; an “Appeal From Judgment”; 

and postconviction relief. The documents were filed in this court in January 2022. 

We questioned our jurisdiction on three bases: (1) there was no appealable 

order based on a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc filed in the trial court; (2) we 

have no jurisdiction over postconviction relief; and (3) any attempted appeal from his 

1998 conviction would be untimely in 2022 and, presumably, precluded by our prior 

review of his 1998 conviction. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a); Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 

694, 696 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); Ater v. Eighth Ct. of App., 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1991) (orig. proceeding); Henry v. State, No. 02-98-00297-CR (Tex. App.—

Fort Worth Oct. 28, 1999, no pet.) (not designated for publication). We recognized, 

however, that we could have (1) mandamus jurisdiction to consider a complaint about 

the trial court’s failure to rule on a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc or about the 

trial court’s denial of such a motion or (2) appellate jurisdiction to determine a timely 

appeal from a judgment nunc pro tunc. See Blanton v. State, 369 S.W.3d 894, 904 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2012); Ex parte Florence, 319 S.W.3d 695, 696 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010); Ex 

parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147, 148–49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). We invited Henry to

respond and warned that we could dismiss his appeal if he did not show grounds for 

our jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. 
3

Henry responded that his documents had not been an appeal but had been

attempts to move for a judgment nunc pro tunc in the trial court and to file a 

postconviction writ of habeas corpus. In short, Henry is not attempting to appeal 

anything to this court at this time. Thus, we dismiss his appeal. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 43.2(f). The clerk of this court shall forward Henry’s documents, which were filed 

in this court on January 6, 2022, to the trial court to be considered as a motion for 

judgment nunc pro tunc and as an application for a postconviction writ of habeas 

corpus. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07; Tex. R. App. P. 23.

/s/ Brian Walker

Brian Walker

Justice

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: March 24, 2022
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**ETHAN ALLEN INTERIORS INC. ANDSUBSIDIARIES**

 

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, David R. Callen, hereby certify that the September 30, 2009 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed by Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (the “Company”), which contains the Company’s financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  David R. Callen  |   | Vice  President, Finance & Treasurer |
|-----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
| (David  R. Callen)    |   |                                     |
|                  |   |                                     |
|                  |   |                                     |
| November 9, 2009 |   |                                     |

 

1

----
#### Moritz Walter and Another v. Katherine G. Farrell.

Motion granted unless appellant complies with terms stated in order. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 142
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 142.11 Entry summary form. ( a ) *CBP Form 7501.* The entry summary must be on the CBP Form 7501, or its electronic equivalent, unless a different form or format is prescribed elsewhere in this chapter. CBP Form 7501, or its electronic equivalent, must be used for merchandise formally entered for consumption, formally entered for warehouse, or rewarehouse in accordance with § 144.11 of this chapter, and formally entered temporarily under bond under § 10.31 of this chapter. The entry summary for merchandise which may be entered free of duty in accordance with § 10.1(g) or (h) may be on CBP Form 3311, or its electronic equivalent, instead of on a CBP Form 7501 (or its electronic equivalent). For merchandise entitled to be entered under an informal entry, see § 143.23 of this chapter.
( b ) *Extra copies.* The CBP may require additional copies of the entry summary if filed in paper.
[CBP Dec. No. 15-14, 80 FR 61289, Oct. 13, 2015]
§ 114.23 Maximum period. ( a ) *A.T.A. carnet.* No A.T.A. carnet with a period of validity exceeding 1 year from date of issue shall be accepted. This period of validity cannot be extended.
( b ) *TIR carnet.* A TIR carnet may be accepted without limitation as to time provided it is initially “taken on charge by a customs administration (United States or foreign) within the period of validity shown on its front cover.”
( c ) *TECRO/AIT carnet.* A TECRO/AIT carnet shall not be issued with a period of validity exceeding one year from the date of issue. This period of validity cannot be extended and must be shown on the front cover of the carnet.
[T.D. 71-70, 36 FR 4491, Mar. 6, 1971, as amended by T.D. 82-116, 47 FR 27262, June 24, 1982; T.D. 85-180, 50 FR 42517, Oct. 21, 1985; T.D. 98-10, 63 FR 4168, Jan. 28, 1998]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-03-024 April 2, 2003 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC ASSIGNS NEW INSPECTOR TO NINE MILE POINT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have assigned Edward C.

Knutson as a resident inspector at the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station in Scriba, NY. He joins Senior

Resident Inspector Gordon Hunegs and Resident Inspector Brian Fuller at the two-unit site. 

Knutson joined the NRC in 1991 as a reactor engineer in the Region I office in King of Prussia. 

He has worked as a resident inspector at the Robert E. Ginna plant in Ontario, N.Y., and most recently

at Vermont Yankee in Vernon, Vt. Prior to joining the agency, Knutson served in the United States

Navy for 14 years. 

Knutson earned a Bachelor of Science degree in biology and a Bachelor of Arts in Chemistry at

Western Washington University in Bellingham, Wash. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They

serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring

significant work projects and interfacing with plant workers and the public.

The Nine Mile Point resident inspectors can be reached at 315/342-4041.

###
July 7, 2015

Mr. Anthony DiVerniero

Key Air, LLC

3 Juliano Drive, Suite 201

Oxford, CT 06478

Dear Mr. DiVerniero :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

§ 135.225(f) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your June 23, 2015 , exemption request on behalf of Key Air, LLC into the public

docket (No. F AA

- 20 11

- 0337 ), but we are unable to process your request any further. The

information you sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The reaso ns why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

• The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that p rovided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detail ed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petitio n/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlined in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must sen d the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not he ar from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brandon Roberts

Manager, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Encl osure3

Project No.: A FS

- 15

- 2479

- E

Project Officer: _______________

ARM

- 101 : KJone s: 6/30/2015 :Doc# 44625

ARM

- 1/100/101 :Program Office AFS

- 200

MR. ANTHONY DIVERNIE RO

KEY AIR, LLC

3 JULIANO DRIVE, SUI TE 201

OXFORD, CT 06478
### §574. Hearings; withholding payments

Whenever the Secretary of the Interior, after reasonable notice and opportunity for hearing, finds that there is a failure to expend funds in accordance with the terms and conditions governing the Federal contribution for such approved projects, he shall notify the Commonwealth that further payments will not be made to the Commonwealth from appropriations under this chapter until he is satisfied that there will no longer be any such failure. Until he is so satisfied the Secretary of the Interior shall withhold the payment of any financial contributions to the Commonwealth.

(July 15, 1955, ch. 369, §4, 69 Stat. 353.)
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Eggers, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of RealNetworks, Inc.; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 29, 2011



|                   |  |                                                             
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael Eggers
|Michael Eggers    
|Title:             |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|                   |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No: 1:20-cv-23287-DPG 

LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, 

MARIA TERESA RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a MARIA TERESA LANDA, 

ALFREDO RAMON FORNS, 

RAMON ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ, 

RAUL LORENZO RODRIGUEZ, 

CHRISTINA CONROY, and 

FRANCISCO RAMON RODRIGUEZ, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

IMPERIAL BRANDS PLC, 

CORPORACIÓN HABANOS, S.A., 

WPP PLC, YOUNG & RUBICAM LLC, 

and BCW LLC, a/k/a BURSON COHN & WOLFE LLC 

Defendants. 

__________________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF FILING 

Plaintiffs, LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, MARIA TERESA RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a 

MARIA TERESA LANDA, ALFREDO RAMON FORNS, RAMON ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ, 

RAUL LORENZO RODRIGUEZ, CHRISTINA CONROY, and FRANCISCO RAMON 

RODRIGUEZ, respectfully give notice of filing the Summons for Defendant IMPERIAL 

BRANDS PLC, to be issued by the Clerk of the Court. A copy of the Summons is attached hereto. 

Dated: August 11, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

Rodriguez Tramont & Nuñez P.A. Berenthal & Associates, P.A. 

By: /s/ Paulino A. Núñez Jr. By: /s/ James L. Berenthal 

Frank R. Rodriguez James L. Berenthal 

Florida Bar No. 348988 Florida Bar No.126035 

Email: frr@rtgn-law.com Email: jlb@berenthalaw.com

Paulino A. Núñez Jr. 777 Third Avenue, Suite 22D 

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case No: 1:20-cv-23287-DPG 

2

Florida Bar No. 814806 New York, NY 10017-1426 

Email: pan@rtgn-law.com Telephone: (212) 302-9494

255 Alhambra Circle, Suite 1150 

Coral Gables, FL 33134 

Telephone: (305) 350-2300 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 11th day of August, 2020, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing has been furnished by electronic filing with the Clerk of the Court via CM/ECF which 

will send notice of electronic filing to all counsel of record. 

By: /s/Paulino A. Núñez Jr.

Paulino A. Núñez Jr. 

Florida Bar No. 814806 

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### § 201.140 Employment.

No qualified handicapped person shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the agency. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613, shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF

G.A.R., M.R. and D.J.R.,

Children.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00085-CV

Appeal from the

388th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2006CM6082)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 21TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
§ 177.25 Form and content of request. ( a ) A request for an advisory ruling shall be in writing and shall contain such information as will enable Customs to provide the requester with the applicable principle of law or well established interpretation relating to the particular country of origin.
( b ) A request for a final determination shall be in writing and shall contain the following information: ( 1 ) The name of the requester, the requester's principal place of business, and a statement that the requester is authorized to file the request under the provisions of § 177.24;
( 2 ) A description of the existing article for which a country-of-origin determination is requested;
( 3 ) The country or instrumentality an article is claimed to be the product of;
( 4 ) Such further information as will enable Customs to determine if an article is a product of a specific country or instrumentality, and;
( 5 ) If applicable, the specific procurement for which the final determination is requested.
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-01-017 June 20, 2001 

 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov 

 

NRC TO MEET WITH PROGRESS ENERGY/CP&L OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS

SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Progress Energy/CP&L officials

on Wednesday, June 27, to discuss the results of NRC's annual assessment of safety performance at the

Harris nuclear power plant.

The meeting will be held at 1:00 p.m. in Room 228 of the Harris Administrative Building at the

plant site southwest of Raleigh, North Carolina. The public is invited to observe the meeting. NRC

officials will be available after the meeting to answer questions. The NRC will hold a second meeting

with state and local government officials after the first meeting. That second meeting is also open to

the public.

A letter sent from NRC Region II to CP&L, which addresses plant safety performance during

the previous year and forms the basis of the meeting discussion, is available from the Region II Office

of Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr. Current information for the plant

is available at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/HAR1/har1_chart.html.

###
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-123 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, July 20, 1998)

NRC CONSIDERS CHANGES TO REGULATIONS

FOR SPENT FUEL STORAGE CASK DESIGNERS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is considering expanding the scope of its

regulations to make them more fully applicable to holders of, and applicants for, NRC

certificates of compliance for the design of a spent fuel storage cask, and to their

contractors and subcontractors. These changes are necessary to more effectively

address performance problems that have occurred in the spent fuel storage industry.

The revisions to Part 72 of the Commission’s regulations would enhance the

agency’s ability to take enforcement action against these companies if they violate

legally binding requirements in Part 72.

The proposed changes would also add recordkeeping and reporting

requirements. They would require that a certificate holder submit a written report to the

NRC within 30 days after finding certain types of deficiencies in the design or fabrication

of a spent fuel storage cask that has been delivered to a licensee (such as a nuclear

power plant operator). The requirement would apply if the deficiency affects the ability

of structures, systems and components important to safety to perform their function.

Another section of the Commission’s regulations (Part 21) already requires certificate

holders and applicants to report a “substantial safety hazard” to the NRC. The

proposed revisions would apply to deficiencies that do not rise to this level.

Further details of the proposed changes are contained in a Federal Register

notice to be published shortly.

Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on the proposed rule

changes to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

20555-0001, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. The comments should

be submitted within 75 days of the Federal Register notice. Comments may also be

provided electronically via the NRC’s interactive rulemaking web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/rule.html.

###