alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 Statement Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings  I, M. Peter Thomas, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Superconductor
Technologies Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 12, 2004 /s/ M. Peter ThomasM. Peter ThomasPresident and Chief Executive
Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 142

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 142.0 Scope.

This part sets forth requirements and procedures relating to (a) the entry of merchandise, as authorized by section 484, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1484), and (b) special permits for immediate delivery of merchandise, as authorized by section 448(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1448(b)).
#### § 158.3 Allowance for lost or missing packages included in an entry summary.

Allowance shall be made in the assessment of duties for lost or missing packages of merchandise included in an entry summary whenever it is established to the satisfaction of the Center director before the liquidation of the entry summary becomes final that the merchandise claimed to be lost or missing was not “permitted.” A claim for such allowance shall be made on Customs Form 5931, in triplicate, executed by the importer and the importing carrier or bonded carrier, as appropriate. When the importing or bonded carrier refuses to execute the Customs Form 5931, a claim may be allowed if the importer properly executes the Customs Form 5931 and attaches copies of the dock receipt or other document evidencing nonreceipt of the lost or missing packages.

[T.D. 72-258, 37 FR 20171, Sept. 27, 1972, as amended by T.D. 79-221, 44 FR 46829, Aug. 9, 1979; CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93023, Dec. 20, 2016]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23778]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Steel Door Institute

    Notice if hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Steel Door Institute 
(``SDI'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Steel Door 
Institute, Cleveland, OH. The nature and scope of SDI's standards 
development activities are: SDI acts as secretariat for the ANSI A250 
Committee, which develops standards for dimension, nomenclature, 
construction, performance, testing, and installation of steel doors and 
frames used in residential and commercial construction.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23778 Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### § 182.62 [Reserved]
COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 3

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 208-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2022 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 208-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### Jane E. Betzag, as Administratrix of the Estate of John A. Betzag, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v. Gulf Oil Corporation, Appellant.

Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No.: 20-CV-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP, 

INC. d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et al.,

Defendants.

RESPONSE IN SUPPORT OF THE RECEIVER’S MOTION TO REIMPOSE 

LITIGATION STAY AS TO CLAIMS AGAINST 

ECKERT SEAMANS AND/OR JOHN W. PAUCIULO

Plaintiffs in the putative class actions captioned Montgomery v. Eckert Seamans Cherin & 

Mellott, No. 20-cv-23750-RAR (S.D. Fla.) (Ruiz, J.) (the “Montgomery Action”) and Melchior v. 

Vagnozzi, No. 20-cv-05562 (E.D. Pa) (Schiller, J.) (the “Melchior Action”), submit this Response 

in Support of the Motion to Reimpose Litigation Stay as to Claims Against Eckert Seamans Cherin 

& Mellott (“Eckert Seamans”) and/or John W. Pauciulo by Ryan K. Stumphauzer (the “Receiver”), 

as equity receiver in SEC v. Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc. d/b/a Par Funding, No. 20-

cv-81205-RAR (S.D. Fla.) (Ruiz, J.). See ECF No. 1598.

The undersigned are counsel for the investor plaintiffs in the Montgomery Action and the 

Melchior Action. Working with the Receiver, on June 7, 2023, we reached an agreement in 

principle to resolve the class claims against Eckert Seamans and John W. Pauciulo. The proposed 

settlement, which is the product of lengthy, hard fought negotiations, would provide substantial 

monetary benefits for investors in various merchant cash advance-backed securities that were sold 

by certain of Receivership Entities.

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1607 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/20/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case No.: 20-CV-81205-RAR

2

The proposed stay of litigation will provide plaintiffs in the Montgomery Action and the 

Melchior Action sufficient time to finalize the settlement with Eckert Seamans and attorney John 

W. Pauciulo. Accordingly, plaintiffs in the Montgomery Action and the Melchior Action believe 

that it would be appropriate to reimpose the Litigation Stay over any case against Eckert Seamans 

and/or John W. Pauciulo that involves Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc., regardless of 

whether a Receivership Entity is a party.

Dated: June 20, 2023 By: /s/Jason Kellogg

Jason Kellogg

LEVINE KELLOGG LEHMAN

SCHNEIDER + GROSSMAN LLP

100 Southeast Second Street

36th Floor

Miami, FL 33131

Tel.: (305) 403-8788

jcs@lklsg.com

jk@lklsg.com

vjw@lklsg.com 

Counsel for Class Plaintiffs Dennis 

Melchior et al. and Robert Montgomery et 

al.

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1607 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/20/2023 Page 2 of 2
### §127. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–51, July 9, 1971, 85 Stat. 129

Section, Pub. L. 87–130, Aug. 10, 1961, 75 Stat. 323; Pub. L. 89–90, July 27, 1965, 79 Stat. 269; Pub. L. 91–145, Dec. 12, 1969, 83 Stat. 343, provided for reimbursement of transportation expenses of employees in Senator's office, authorizing eight round trips in any fiscal year and two additional mileage payments when office of Senator is from a State having a population of ten million or more inhabitants and requiring voucher certification of travel as being in line of official duty.

Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Act June 27, 1956, ch. 453, 70 Stat. 360, as amended by acts July 12, 1960, Pub. L. 86–628, 74 Stat. 449; Mar. 31, 1961, Pub. L. 87–14, title I, 75 Stat. 29.

Act Aug. 5, 1955, ch. 568, 69 Stat. 504.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 92–51 provided that the repeal is effective July 1, 1971.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-069 December 7, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC ASSIGNS NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have selected Steven Dennis

as the agency's resident inspector at the Oyster Creek nuclear power plant. He joins Senior Resident

Inspector Laura Dudes at the Lacey Township, N.J., plant.

Dennis joined the NRC as a license examiner and inspector in the Region I Division of Reactor

Safety in office in December 1996. Prior to joining the Agency, he was a reactor operator, senior

reactor operator, control room supervisor and shift manager at the Hope Creek Generating Station in

Hancockís Bridge, N.J. He also served in the United States Navy.

Dennis earned a bachelor's degree in applied science and technology from Thomas Edison State

College in Trenton, N.J.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They

serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring

significant work projects and talking with plant workers and the public.

The Oyster Creek resident inspectors can be reached at 609/693-0702.

###
### §38. Evidence of possession and work to establish right to patent

Where such person or association, they and their grantors, have held and worked their claims for a period equal to the time prescribed by the statute of limitations for mining claims of the State or Territory where the same may be situated, evidence of such possession and working of the claims for such period shall be sufficient to establish a right to a patent thereto under sections 21, 22 to 24, 26 to 28, 29, 30, 33 to 48, 50 to 52, 71 to 76 of this title and section 661 of title 43, in the absence of any adverse claim; but nothing in such sections shall be deemed to impair any lien which may have attached in any way whatever to any mining claim or property thereto attached prior to the issuance of a patent.

(R.S. §2332.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 21, 22 to 24, 26 to 28, 29, 30, 33 to 48, 50 to 52, 71 to 76 of this title and section 661 of title 43, referred to in text, were in the original "this chapter", meaning chapter 6 of title 32 of the Revised Statutes, consisting of R.S. §§2318 to 2352.

#### Codification

R.S. §2332 derived from act July 9, 1870, ch. 235, §13, 16 Stat. 217.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Submerged Lands Act

Provisions of this section as not amended, modified or repealed by the Submerged Lands Act, see section 1303 of Title 43, Public Lands.
#### § 210.62 Evidentiary hearing.

An opportunity for a hearing in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act and § 210.36 of this part will be provided in connection with every motion for temporary relief. If a hearing is conducted, the presiding administrative law judge may, but is not required to, take evidence concerning the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding by respondents under section 337 (e)(1), (f)(1), and (j)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Leon Fletcher, * From the 259th District Court

of Jones County,

Trial Court No. 011444.

Vs. No. 11-24-00004-CR * February 1, 2024

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal 

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
### §84a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 84a was editorially reclassified as section 5561 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             114
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,837
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,090
<INVENTORY>                                     26,161
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,706
<PP&E>                                          97,269
<DEPRECIATION>                                (43,667)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 163,702
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,605
<BONDS>                                        178,281
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      9,161
<COMMON>                                        34,283
<OTHER-SE>                                    (85,628)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   163,702
<SALES>                                        169,932
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               169,932
<CGS>                                          121,119
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  164,254
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,789
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,025
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,885)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,885)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,885)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (6.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.38)



</TABLE>
§ 200.735-114a Employees not required to submit statements. ( a ) Employees in positions that meet the criteria in paragraphs (b)(1) or (c)(1) of § 200.735-114 of this subpart may be exempted from the reporting requirement of § 200.735-114 if the Director of Personnel, upon obtaining the advice of the General Counsel, determines that: ( 1 ) The duties of a position are such that the likelihood of the incumbent's involvement in a conflict-of-interest situation is remote;
( 2 ) The duties of a position are at such a level of responsibility that the submission of a statement of employment and financial interests is not necessary because of the degree of supervision and review over the incumbent or the inconsequential effect on the integrity of the Government.
( b ) All determinations made pursuant to paragraph (a) shall be documented in a writing which shall be annexed to the listings required by paragraphs (b)(2) and (c)(2) of § 200.735-114 of this subpart. The factual bases and reasons for determinations under paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section shall be specified by the Director of Personnel in said writing. Said writing shall refer to the *position* only and shall not include the name, or other identifying particular, of the incumbent occupying the position.
( c ) A statement of employment and financial interests from commissioners is not required by this subpart. Such employees are subject to separate reporting requirements under section 401 of Executive Order 11222 (3 CFR 306 (1964-1965 Comp.)).
[42 FR 59958, Nov. 23, 1977]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-87

October 13, 1999

NRC REGION I ISSUES MID-CYCLE PLANT PERFORMANCE REVIEW RESULTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is making its mid-cycle

Plant Performance Reviews (PPRs) for nuclear power plants

available on the NRC web site. PPRs are an interim measure the

NRC is using to assess nuclear power plant safety. The agency

began using it for this purpose after suspending the Systematic

Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) in 1998 while it

developed a revised reactor oversight process. The text of each

mid-cycle PPR letter is available from the NRC Region I Office of

Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr.

Full scale PPRs, which consisted of an in-depth, integrated

assessment of overall plant performance were conducted

approximately six months ago. The results of those PPRs were

communicated to each power reactor licensee, and provided

performance information similar to that previously contained in

SALP reports. The recently conducted mid-cycle PPRs did not

entail the same level of assessment effort. The primary purpose

of these reviews was to evaluate safety performance information

from the past six months to identify any changes in performance

from that described in the last PPRs in order to allocate

inspection resources appropriately.

In most instances, the region will continue to execute

inspection plans consisting of core and regional initiative

inspections, commensurate with the level of performance described

in the PPRs issued last spring. However, as a result of the

staff’s recent evaluation of licensee performance, the inspection

activity at some plants will be adjusted in certain areas.

An important element of the previous SALP process was the

public meeting the NRC would have with the licensee to discuss

the assessment results. During the interim process, the staff

has continued its practice of meeting with licensees periodically

to discuss its performance assessment. Most plants have had

public meetings in the recent past and therefore few meetings are

scheduled as a result of the PPRs. These meetings are announced

in advance and are open to the public.
The revised reactor oversight process is currently

undergoing a pilot evaluation at nine plants and is scheduled for

full implementation next spring. Under the revised process, the

staff will conduct quarterly performance reviews based on a

number of performance indicators and inspection findings. A full

description of the revised program is posted on the NRC web site

at www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm or

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/index.html

#
Searched for **http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/UserFiles/works/pdfs/ri8323.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/UserFiles/works/pdfs/ri8323.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPath planning for assembly of strut-based structuresA path planning method with collision avoidance for a general single chain nonredundant or redundant robot is proposed. Joint range boundary overruns are also avoided. The result is a sequence of joint vectors which are passed to a trajectory planner. A potential field algorithm in joint space computes incremental joint vectors delta-q = delta-q(sub a) + delta-q(sub c) + delta-q(sub r). Adding delta-q to the robot's current joint vector leads to the next step in the path. Delta-q(sub a) is obtained by computing the minimum norm solution of the underdetermined linear system J delta-q(sub a) = x(sub a) where x(sub a) is a translational and rotational force vector that attracts the robot to its goal position and orientation. J is the manipulator Jacobian. Delta-q(sub c) is a collision avoidance term encompassing collisions between the robot (links and payload) and obstacles in the environment as well as collisions among links and payload of the robot themselves. It is obtained in joint space directly. Delta-q(sub r) is a function of the current joint vector and avoids joint range overruns. A higher level discrete search over candidate safe positions is used to provide alternatives in case the potential field algorithm encounters a local minimum and thus fails to reach the goal. The best first search algorithm A* is used for graph search. Symmetry properties of the payload and equivalent rotations are exploited to further enlarge the number of alternatives passed to the potential field algorithm.Document ID19930007433Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeThesis/DissertationAuthorsMuenger, Rolf*(Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst. Troy, NY, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1991Subject CategoryCyberneticsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-191874RPI-CIRSSE-91NAS 1.26:191874Accession Number93N16622Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAGW-1333Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930007433.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024