alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# DATE AND TIME:

Thursday, October 28, 2004 at 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# STATUS:

This meeting will be open to the public. 

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2004-38: George Nethercutt and the Nethercutt for Senate Committee by counsel, Stephen M. Hoersting and Tim McKeever. 

Draft Advisory Opinion 2004-39: Washington State Republican Party by Chris Vance, Chairman (Tentative).

Explanation and justification for the Political Committee rulemaking.

Routine administrative matters.

# SPECIAL EXECUTIVE SESSION:

*Date and Time:*                         Thursday, October 28, 2004, to follow the opening meeting.                    

*Place:*                         999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.                     

*Status:*                         This meeting will be closed to the public pursuant to 11 CFR 2.4(b)(7).                     

*Person to Contact for Information:*                         Mr. Robert Biersack, Acting Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.                    

Mary W. Dove, 

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 04-23855 Filed 10-20-04; 2:53 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
#### § 182.123 Corrected certification of origin by U.S. exporters or producers.

Civil or administrative penalties provided for under 19 U.S.C. 1592 will not be imposed on an exporter or producer who completed a certification of origin for a good exported from the United States to Canada or Mexico when the exporter or producer promptly and voluntarily provides written notification pursuant to §§ 182.21(b) and 182.124 with respect to the making of an incorrect certification of origin.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov 

No. III-03-024 April 2, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO MEET WITH OFFICIALS FROM NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT

TO DISCUSS SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT PRAIRIE ISLAND

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials from the Nuclear

Management Company on Monday, April 8, to discuss the results of NRC’s annual assessment of the

Prairie Island nuclear power plant, located in Welch, Minnesota.

The meeting will be held at 2 p.m. in the Prairie Island Training Center Auditorium, 1717

Wakonade Drive East, in Welch. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will

be available before the conclusion of the meeting for questions and comments from the public.

A letter from the NRC to the Nuclear Management Company addresses plant safety

performance during the previous year and forms the basis for the meeting discussions. The letter

states that, overall, Prairie Island operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety. 

The letter states that there was one finding of low to moderate safety significance in the second

quarter of the year. This finding was associated with the lubrication water source for the safety-related

cooling water pumps.

The letter also states, “Additionally, on December 13, 2002, the staff issued a Severity Level III

Notice of Violation and a Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in accordance with the enforcement

policy. The action was issued for incomplete and inaccurate information provided in April 2001 as part

of a request for a Notice of Enforcement Discretion.”

In addition to baseline inspections, the NRC will conduct supplemental safety issues

inspections in 2003. 

The assessment letter is available from Region III Public Affairs Office and on the NRC web

site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/prai_2002q4.pdf

In addition, the letter notes: "As you are aware, since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001,

the NRC has issued several Orders and threat advisories to enhance security capabilities and improve guard

force readiness. We have conducted inspections to review your implementation of these requirements and

have monitored your actions in response to changing threat advisories. For calendar Year 2003, we plan
to continue these inspections and conduct portions of the security baseline inspection program, as well as

perform additional inspections to evaluate your compliance with new requirements that may be ordered."

Current performance information for Prairie Island is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html

###
### §436. Retention of records

Every person required to file any report under this subchapter shall maintain records on the matters required to be reported which will provide in sufficient detail the necessary basic information and data from which the documents filed with the Secretary may be verified, explained, or clarified, and checked for accuracy and completeness, and shall include vouchers, worksheets, receipts, and applicable resolutions, and shall keep such records available for examination for a period of not less than five years after the filing of the documents based on the information which they contain.

(Pub. L. 86–257, title II, §206, Sept. 14, 1959, 73 Stat. 529.)
##### 



Exhibit 13 Telstra Corporation Limited Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
 Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Telstra Corporation Limited, an Australian public
limited liability company (the Company), hereby certifies that: The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2004 (the
Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company. Dated: 29 October 2004 /S/ Z E Switkowski




---



##### 



Exhibit 13 Telstra Corporation Limited Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)
 Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Telstra Corporation Limited, an Australian public
limited liability company (the Company), hereby certifies that: The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2004 (the
Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company. Dated: 29 October 2004 /s/ J Stanhope
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-126 October 23, 2001

NRC CONCURS ON DOEíS PROPOSED FINAL SITING 

GUIDELINES FOR YUCCA MOUNTAIN

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has concurred in the Department of Energyís draft general

siting guidelines for evaluating the suitability of Yucca Mountain, Nevada, as a site for development of

a possible nuclear waste repository. This concurrence is conditional on DOEís agreement to notify

NRC of any changes to the draft final guidelines, including any changes to the supplemental

information, and its agreement to retransmit the revised rulemaking package to the Commission, if any

substantive changes are made, for a determination as to whether re-concurrence is needed. 

The revised draft guidelines, which would be contained in Part 963 of DOEís regulations, focus

on the criteria and methodology to be used for evaluating relevant geological and other related aspects

of the Yucca Mountain site. They are based on NRCís recently revised Part 63 regulations for licensing

a nuclear waste repository. 

The NRC noted that DOE has addressed NRCís March 2000 comments submitted as part of the

1999-2000 public comment process on an earlier version of Part 963. DOE amended its siting

guidelines to recognize NRC jurisdiction over resolution of differences between the siting guidelines

and NRCís geologic disposal regulations. DOE further committed to obtain NRC concurrence on any

future siting guideline revisions that relate to NRC jurisdiction. 

 The DOE has indicated that, using the criteria set forth in Part 963, the Secretary of Energy will

make a decision on whether to recommend Yucca Mountain to the President as the repository site for

highly radioactive materials. The Secretary will base this decision on the site characterization studies

performed at Yucca Mountain. 

 ###
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,633
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                       465
<INVENTORY>                                      3,551
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,180
<PP&E>                                          26,156
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,487
<BONDS>                                             37
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,315
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,181
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,248
<SALES>                                         87,170
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,170
<CGS>                                           69,292
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,292
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,025
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,940
<INCOME-TAX>                                       761
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,179
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,179
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 134.914 The decision.

The Judge will issue his or her decision within 45 calendar days after close of record, as practicable. The Judge's decision is final and will not be reconsidered.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone 301/415-820

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-086 July 1, 2003

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO HOLD JULY MEETING IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards will

hold a public meeting July 10 and 11 in Rockville, Md. The committee will discuss, among

other items, the Economic and Simplified Boiling Water Reactor design and a proposed mixedoxide fuel fabrication facility.

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North

building, at 11545 Rockville Pike. The meeting will begin at 8:30 a.m. each day. A portion of

the July 10 session will be closed to the public to discuss safeguards information. A complete

agenda will be available on the NRC’s Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2003/ .

For additional information, please contact Dr. Sher Bahadur, at 301-415-0138.

###
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-011 February 1, 2001

NRC SCHEDULES WORKSHOP ON FUEL FACILITY OVERSIGHT

The NRC has scheduled a workshop on February 8 in Rockville, Maryland, to obtain

suggestions from the public on improving the agency’s oversight program for nuclear fuel cycle

facilities.

This workshop is one of several to be held to factor public and other stakeholder comments into

a revised fuel facility oversight program. These facilities process and fabricate uranium ore into

nuclear reactor fuel.

This meeting will focus on the work plan and the schedule of activities and milestones to revise

the oversight program. A draft project work plan has been posted on the NRC website at

http://techconf.llnl.gov/cgi-bin/topics.

The goals of the oversight program are to:

ˇ Focus attention on activities where potential risks are greatest,

ˇ Obtain more objective indicators of risk-related performance,

ˇ Increase public confidence in the NRC’s oversight program, and

ˇ Increase regulatory effectiveness, efficiency, and realism.

This initiative will employ lessons learned from the recently revised commercial nuclear reactor

oversight program.

The workshop, which is open to the public, will be held from 10:00 a.m. until 1:00 p.m. in

Room O-16B4 of the agency’s headquarters at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike. Visitor

parking is limited; however, the building can be easily reached via the Red Line Metro to the White

Flint station.

Those who seek background information on this initiative may obtain transcripts and

presentations from past meetings at www.nrc.gov/NMSS/FCSS/FCOB/INSP/REVISED/fcindex.htm

on NRC’s website.

###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-068 December 4, 2002 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

DAVID L. PELTON ASSIGNED AS NEW NRC SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR 

AT VERMONT YANKEE

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have selected David L. Pelton

as the new senior resident inspector at the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant in Vernon, Vt. He

replaces Brian McDermott, who was promoted to a branch chief position in the Regional Office. 

Every commercial nuclear power plant in the U.S. has at least two NRC resident inspectors. 

They have an office where they work at the facility, conducting regular inspections and monitoring

significant work projects.

Most recently, Pelton was a senior operations engineer in the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill. 

Prior to that he was a resident inspector at the Braidwood Power Station in Braceville, Ill. For several

months earlier this year, he was an acting branch chief in the Region III Division of Reactor Safety. 

 Before joining the NRC in 1997, Pelton was a nuclear engineer at the Portsmouth Naval

Shipyard in Portsmouth, N.H. He earned a bachelor of science degree in mechanical engineering from

Pennsylvania State University.

Pelton joins resident inspector Ed Knutson at Vermont Yankee. They can be reached at

802/257-4319.

###
Effect estimates adjusted analyses CRP paper.xlsx 1 of 3 Figure 1. Associations of maternal air pollution exposure with the risks of elevated maternal CRP levels in early pregnancy (N=5067). Adjusted for gestational age at measurement, maternal age, body mass index, parity, ethnicity, education, smoking, alcohol consumption, noise exposure, and season of conception.

PM Dat 1-7 ORlower limitupper limit Q1 1.00 Q2 1.14 0.94 1.38 Q3 1.11 0.91 1.35 Q4 1.32 1.08 1.61

PM Day 1-14 ORlower limitupper limit Q1 1.00 Q2 1.17 0.96 1.43 Q3 1.28 1.06 1.56 Q4 1.19 0.97 1.46

PM Day 1-28 ORlower limitupper limit Q1 1.00 Q2 1.15 0.95 1.40 Q3 1.21 0.99 1.48 Q4 1.18 0.95 1.44

NO Day 1-7 ORlower limitupper limit Q1 1 Q2 0.98 0.80 1.19 Q3 1.15 0.93 1.41 Q4 1.00 0.80 1.23

NO Day 1-14 ORlower limitupper limit Q1 1 Q2 0.93 0.76 1.15 Q3 1.12 0.90 1.39 Q4 0.98 0.78 1.24Effect estimates adjusted analyses CRP paper.xlsx 2 of 3 NO Day 1-28 ORlower limitupper limit Q1 1 Q2 1.02 0.82 1.26 Q3 1.11 0.88 1.40 Q4 1.09 0.86 1.40

Figure 2. Associations of maternal air pollution exposure with the risks of elevated fetal CRP levels at delivery (N=4450). Adjusted for gestational age at birth, season of birth, maternal age, body mass index, parity, ethnicity, education, smoking, alcohol consumption, and noise exposure.

PM Dat 1-7 ORlower limitupper limit Q1 1.00 Q2 1.68 0.87 3.22 Q3 0.94 0.45 1.98 Q4 1.00 0.47 2.13

PM Day 1-14 ORlower limitupper limit Q1 1.00 Q2 1.24 0.64 2.41 Q3 0.76 0.36 1.63 Q4 1.26 0.63 2.51

PM Day 1-28 ORlower limitupper limit Q1 1.00 Q2 1.07 0.52 2.19 Q3 1.37 0.68 2.74 Q4 1.39 0.67 2.87Effect estimates adjusted analyses CRP paper.xlsx 3 of 3 PM Total pregnancyORlower limitupper limit Q1 1.00 Q2 1.29 0.54 2.95 Q3 1.19 0.54 2.59 Q4 2.18 1.08 4.37

NO Day 1-7 ORlower limitupper limit Q1 1.00 Q2 1.09 0.49 2.39 Q3 1.39 0.61 3.14 Q4 1.97 0.87 4.45

NO Day 1-14 ORlower limitupper limit Q1 1.00 Q2 1.40 0.61 3.21 Q3 1.79 0.74 4.29 Q4 2.31 0.93 5.73

NO Day 1-28 ORlower limitupper limit Q1 1.00 Q2 1.15 0.49 2.69 Q3 1.63 0.66 3.98 Q4 2.37 0.93 5.99

NO Total pregnancyORlower limitupper limit Q1 1.00 Q2 1.95 0.84 4.49 Q3 2.86 1.25 6.48 Q4 3.41 1.35 8.57
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0092 IN THE MATTER OF: F.S., Respondent and Appellant. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 9, 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 28 2020

09/28/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0092
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCalibration of the visible and near-infrared channels of the LANDSAT-5 Thematic Mapper using high-altitude aircraft measurementsVisible near-infrared sensors mounted on operational satellites now in use do not have on-board full aperture absolute calibration devices. One means of establishing an in-orbit calibration for a satellite sensor is to make simultaneous measurements of a bright, uniform scene along the satellite view vector from a calibrated instrument on board a high altitude aircraft. In the work reported here, aircraft data were recorded over White Sands, New Mexico at satellite overpass time for the LANDSAT-5 Thematic Mapper (TM). A comparison of the coincident aircraft and orbiting satellite data showed the radiometric gain for TM channel 1 had degraded 4.7 percent by August 28, 1985; gains for TM channels 2 and 3 were within 1 percent of prelaunch values.Document ID19900017822Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSmith, G. R.*(National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Washington, DC., United States)*Levin, R. H.*(National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Washington, DC., United States)*Knoll, J. S.*(National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Washington, DC., United States)*Koyanagi, R. S.*(National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Washington, DC., United States)*Wrigley, R. C.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1990Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-102185NAS 1.15:102185A-89107Accession Number90N27138Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 677-22-29Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017822.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 161.5 Compromise of Government claims. ( a ) *Offer.* An offer made pursuant to section 617, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1617), in compromise of a Government claim arising under the Customs laws and the terms upon which it is made shall be stated in writing addressed to the Commissioner of Customs. The offer shall be limited to the civil liability of the proponent in the matter which is the subject of the Government's claim.
( b ) *Deposit of specific sum tendered.* No offer in which a specific sum of money is tendered in compromise of a Government claim under the Customs laws will be considered by the Commissioner of Customs until due notice is received that such sum has been properly deposited in the name of the person submitting the offer with the Treasurer of the United States or a Federal Reserve bank. A proponent at a distance from a Federal Reserve bank may perfect his offer by tendering a bank draft for the amount of the offer payable to the Secretary of the Treasury for collection and deposit. If the offer is rejected, the money will be returned to the proponent.
(Sec. 617, 46 Stat. 757, as amended; 19 U.S.C. 1617)
### §5623. Effective date

The allowance under section 5622 of this title—

(1) shall be available beginning with the month of May 1997;

(2) through the end of September 1997, shall be paid from the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives on a pro rata basis; and

(3) beginning with fiscal year 1998, shall be paid as provided in appropriations Acts.

(Pub. L. 105–55, title I, §101, Oct. 7, 1997, 111 Stat. 1183.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 74d–2 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is based on section 2 of House Resolution No. 130, One Hundred Fifth Congress, Apr. 24, 1997, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 105–55.