alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000895516                  
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos          
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         278742
<SECURITIES>                                   215200
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7253353
<ALLOWANCES>                                   125000
<INVENTORY>                                    4383382
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               15221460
<PP&E>                                         1203662
<DEPRECIATION>                                 438209
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 19450201
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11526026
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
 <PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                       44200
<OTHER-SE>                                     7013438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   19450201
<SALES>                                        1257349
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1911487
<CGS>                                          833287
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1882337
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             186419
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                21767
<INCOME-TAX>                                   17598
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4169
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4169
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00
        


</TABLE>
### §1470. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Administrator, for purposes of carrying out the provisions of subchapters I and II and this subchapter, such sums as may be necessary for the fiscal years ending September 30, 1981, and September 30, 1982, and $1,469,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1983, $2,150,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1984, $1,500,000 for each of the fiscal years ending September 30, 1985, and September 30, 1986, $1,500,000 for each of the fiscal years ending September 30, 1987, September 30, 1988, and September 30, 1989, and $1,525,000 for each of the fiscal years 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, and 1994.

(Pub. L. 96–283, title III, §310, June 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 582; Pub. L. 97–416, Jan. 4, 1983, 96 Stat. 2084; Pub. L. 98–623, title IV, §403, Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3408; Pub. L. 99–507, §2, Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1847; Pub. L. 101–178, §1, Nov. 28, 1989, 103 Stat. 1297.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1989—Pub. L. 101–178 inserted provisions authorizing appropriations of $1,525,000 for each of fiscal years 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, and 1994.

1986—Pub. L. 99–507 inserted provisions authorizing appropriations of $1,500,000 for each of fiscal years ending Sept. 30, 1987, Sept. 30, 1988, and Sept. 30, 1989.

1984—Pub. L. 98–623 inserted provisions authorizing appropriations of $1,500,000 for each of fiscal years ending Sept. 30, 1985, and Sept. 30, 1986.

1983—Pub. L. 97–416 inserted provisions authorizing appropriations of $1,469,000 for fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 1983, and $2,150,000 for fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 1984.
### §61h–3. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 61h–3, Pub. L. 94–59, title I, July 25, 1975, 89 Stat. 269, authorized Senate Majority and Minority Leaders to appoint and fix compensation of an executive secretary and a clerical assistant effective July 1, 1975. Positions established by Legislative Branch Appropriation Act, 1970, for Offices of Senate Majority and Minority Leaders, which Act, Pub. L. 91–145, Dec. 12, 1969, 83 Stat. 339, classified to former section 61h–1 of this title, authorized the respective leaders to appoint an executive secretary, and a clerical assistant, were abolished, see Pub. L. 95–26, title I, May 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 80, set out as a note under former section 61h–1 of this title. See, also, section 6131 of this title.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-81272-Civ-MIDDLEBROOKS/Brannon

NELSON FERNANDEZ, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

ELIE’S INC., d/b/a ELIE’S JEWELRY,

a Florida for-profit corporation,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff NELSON FERNANDEZ, by and through his undersigned Counsel, hereby 

provides notice that the parties have reached a settlement and will be executing necessary 

paperwork resolving all claims and matters in the case. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request 

that the Court provide the parties ten (10) days from the date of filing this Notice to allow the parties 

to finalize the settlement agreement and file a stipulation for dismissal with prejudice.

DATED: August 28, 2020.

Respectfully submitted, 

RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO

Counsel for Plaintiff DURAN, P.A.

4800 N. Hiatus Road Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

Sunrise, FL 33351 4640 N.W. 7th Street

T. 954/362-3800 Miami, FL 33126-2309

954/362-3779 (Facsimile) T. 305/266-9780 

Email: rhannah@rhannahlaw.com 305/269-8311 (Facsimile)

Email: pduran@pelayoduran.com

By____s/ Roderick V. Hannah __ By ___s/ Pelayo M. Duran ______

RODERICK V. HANNAH PELAYO M. DURAN

Fla. Bar No. 435384 Fla. Bar No. 0146595

Case 9:20-cv-81272-DMM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2020 Page 1 of 1
Searched for **http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/UserFiles/works/pdfs/ri8795.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/UserFiles/works/pdfs/ri8795.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-03-017 March 21, 2003

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

 

NRC TO MEET WITH PROGRESS ENERGY OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS SAFETY

PERFORMANCE AT ROBINSON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Progress Energy officials on

Thursday, March 27, to discuss the results of NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at the

Robinson nuclear power plant near Hartsville, South Carolina.

The meeting will be held at 3:00 p.m. in the Hartsville Memorial Library, 147 College Avenue

in Hartsville. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be available before

the conclusion of the meeting to answer any questions.

A letter from the NRC to Progress Energy addresses plant safety performance during the

previous year and forms the basis for the meeting discussions. The letter states that, overall, Robinson

operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and that plant performance was at a level

requiring no additional NRC inspection beyond normal baseline activities. The letter, which is

available from Region II Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/rob_2002q4.pdf , says the NRC staff will also

conduct inspections of the plant’s implementation of NRC security advisories and Orders, perform

inspections associated with license renewal and routine inspections of the independent spent fuel

storage installation. 

Current performance indicators for the Harris plant are available at 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/ROB2/rob2_chart.html

###
#### The Otis Lithograph Company, Plaintiff, v. Ralph D. Bryan, Appellant, Impleaded with John C. Fischer, Respondent.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §1758. Use of royalty-in-kind revenue by Minerals Management Service

That in fiscal year 2006 and thereafter, the MMS may under the royalty-in-kind program, or under its authority to transfer oil to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, use a portion of the revenues from royalty-in-kind sales, without regard to fiscal year limitation, to pay for transportation to wholesale market centers or upstream pooling points, to process or otherwise dispose of royalty production taken in kind, and to recover MMS transportation costs, salaries, and other administrative costs directly related to the royalty-in-kind program.

(Pub. L. 109–54, title I, Aug. 2, 2005, 119 Stat. 512.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

MMS, referred to in text, means the Minerals Management Service.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2006, and not as part of the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act of 1982 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Similar Provisions

Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 108–447, div. E, title I, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3053.

Pub. L. 108–108, title I, Nov. 10, 2003, 117 Stat. 1255.

Pub. L. 108–7, div. F, title I, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 229.

Pub. L. 107–63, title I, Nov. 5, 2001, 115 Stat. 428.

Pub. L. 106–291, title I, Oct. 11, 2000, 114 Stat. 932.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

The Minerals Management Service was abolished and functions divided among the Office of Natural Resources Revenue, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement. See Secretary of the Interior Orders No. 3299 of May 19, 2010, and No. 3302 of June 18, 2010, and chapters II, V, and XII of title 30, Code of Federal Regulations, as revised by final rules of the Department of the Interior at 75 F.R. 61051 and 76 F.R. 64432.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 23.02



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No.
333-60053) and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-43659 and 333-59205) of Building One Services
Corporation of our report dated February 17, 1998, relating to the financial
statements of Crest International, LLC appearing in the Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.  We also consent to the references to
us under the heading "Experts" in such Prospectus.


/s/ Shinners, Hucovski and Company, S.C.

Shinners, Hucovski and Company, S.C.
Green Bay, Wisconsin
March 26, 1999
**Exhibit 21.1**

**OMNI Energy Services Corp’s Subsidiaries**

OMNI Energy Services Corp. 

Trussco, Inc. 

Trussco Properties, L.L.C. 

American Helicopters Inc. 

OMNI Energy Seismic Services Corp. 

OMNI Offshore Aviation Corp. 

OMNI Labor Corporation 

OMNI Properties Corp. 

OMNI Energy Services Corp.—Mexico 

OMNI Energia Mexicana 

OMNI International Energy Services 

American Aviation L.L.C. 

OMNI Energy Services—Alaska, Inc. 

Hamilton Drill Tech, Inc. 

Gulf Coast Resources, Inc.
#### § 208.4 Who may file a petition, request, or resolution.

An investigation under this subpart may be commenced on the basis of a petition properly filed by an interested party described in § 208.2(i) of this part which is representative of a United States long-haul trucking services industry; at the request of the President or the Trade Representative; or upon the resolution of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives or the Committee on Finance of the Senate.
§ 127.2 Withdrawal from general order for entry or exportation. ( a ) *Exportation within 6 months from date of importation.* Merchandise in general order may be exported without examination or appraisement if the merchandise is delivered to the exporting carrier within 6 months from the date of importation. This merchandise may be entered within 6 months from date of importation for immediate transportation to any port of entry designated by the consignee.
( b ) *After expiration of 6 months from date of importation.* Entry for immediate transportation shall be permitted after the expiration of the 6-month period only for the purpose of filing an entry for consumption at the port of destination.
( c ) *Withdrawal of less than single general order lot.* The withdrawal from general order of less than a single general order lot shall not be permitted except as provided for in § 141.52 of this chapter.
[T.D. 74-114, 39 FR 12092, Apr. 3, 1974, as amended by T.D. 98-74, 63 FR 51290, Sept. 25, 1998]
Exhibit 10.1

June
30, 2003
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

The
certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code. This certification is not to be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute a part of Endesa, S.A.'s Annual Report on
Form 20-F (the "Report") accompanying this letter.

Rafael
Miranda Robredo, the Chief Executive Officer of Endesa, S.A., and José Luis Palomo Alvarez, the Chief Financial Officer of Endesa, S.A., each certifies that, to the
best of his knowledge:



| |  | /s/ Rafael Miranda RobredoName: Rafael Miranda Robredo
Title: Chief Executive Officer    
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ José Luis Palomo AlvarezName: José Luis Palomo Alvarez
Title: Chief Financial Officer
| |  |                                                                                          

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Endesa, S.A. and will be retained by Endesa, S.A. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
### §72d. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 72d was editorially reclassified as section 4336 of this title.
§ 191.35 Notice of intent to export; examination of merchandise. ( a ) *Notice.* A notice of intent to export merchandise which may be the subject of an unused merchandise drawback claim (19 U.S.C. 1313(j)) must be provided to the Customs Service to give Customs the opportunity to examine the merchandise. The claimant, or the exporter, must file at the port of intended examination a Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy, or Return Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback on Customs Form 7553 at least 2 working days prior to the date of intended exportation unless Customs approves another filing period or the claimant has been granted a waiver of prior notice (see § 191.91 of this part).
( b ) *Required Information.* The notice shall certify that the merchandise has not been used in the United States before exportation. In addition, the notice shall provide the bill of lading number, if known, the name and telephone number, mailing address, and, if available, fax number and e-mail address of a contact person, and the location of the merchandise.
( c ) *Decision to examine or to waive examination.* Within two (2) working days after receipt of the Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy, or Return Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback (see paragraph (a) of this section), Customs will notify the party designated on the Notice in writing of Customs decision to either examine the merchandise to be exported, or to waive examination. If Customs timely notifies the designated party, in writing, of its decision to examine the merchandise (see paragraph (d) of this section), but the merchandise is exported without having been presented to Customs for examination, any drawback claim, or part thereof, based on the Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy, or Return Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback shall be denied. If Customs notifies the designated party, in writing, of its decision to waive examination of the merchandise, or, if timely notification of a decision by Customs to examine or to waive examination is absent, the merchandise may be exported without delay.
( d ) *Time and place of examination.* If Customs gives timely notice of its decision to examine the export merchandise, the merchandise to be examined shall be promptly presented to Customs. Customs shall examine the merchandise within five (5) working days after presentation of the merchandise. The merchandise may be exported without examination if Customs fails to timely examine the merchandise after presentation to Customs. If the examination is completed at a port other than the port of actual exportation, the merchandise shall be transported in-bond to the port of exportation.
( e ) *Extent of examination.* The appropriate Customs office may permit release of merchandise without examination, or may examine routinely (to the extent determined to be necessary) the items exported.
NUMBER 13-14-00651-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE STATE FARM LLOYDS

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Per Curiam Order

Relator, State Farm Lloyds, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause 

on November 10, 2014, through which it contends that the trial court has abused its 

discretion in ordering relator to produce electronically stored information. See, e.g., TEX.

R. CIV. P. 196.4; In re Weekley Homes, L.P., 295 S.W.3d 309, 322 (Tex. 2009) (orig. 

proceeding). Relator has further filed a motion for stay pending mandamus through which 

it seeks to stay the trial court’s order requiring the production of electronically stored 

information pending resolution of this original proceeding.
2

The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for stay pending 

mandamus, is of the opinion that said motion should be granted. The motion for stay 

pending mandamus is hereby GRANTED, and the trial court’s October 17, 2014 “Order 

Adopting Recommendation No. 4 (SF) of Special Master Regarding Case Management 

Order No. 3” and all trial court proceedings pertaining to the discovery of electronically 

stored information are ordered STAYED pending further order of this Court, or until the 

case is finally decided. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an 

order granting temporary relief is effective until the case is finally decided.”). 

The Court requests that the real parties in interest, the plaintiffs in this multidistrict 

litigation proceeding, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief 

sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of 

ten days from the date of this order. See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

13th day of November, 2014.
#### Joseph P. Carney, Appellant, v. Penn Realty Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
- EO13019TransmittalFinal.pdf
- ExecutiveOrder13019_ChildSupport-Portrait 2.pdf
<Page>

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective
Amendment No. 8 to the registration statement on Form S-6 (No. 33-65243) of our
report dated February 15, 2002, relating to the financial statements of Fortis
Benefits Insurance Company, which appears in the Prospectus constituting part of
Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to such registration statement. We also consent
to the incorporation by reference of our report dated April 6, 2001, relating to
the financial statements of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account
C, which appears in such Prospectus. We also consent to the reference to us
under the heading "Independent Public Accountants" in such Prospectus.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 21, 2003
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0115 - Alternative Dispute Resolution Review Team (ART) Pilot Program Recommendations for Using Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Techniques in the Handling of Discrimination and Other External Wrongdoing  Issues

Accession Number: ML030170369

Date Released: Monday, September 8, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML030170277 - SECY-03-0115 - Alternative Dispute Resolution Review Team (ART) Pilot Program Recommendations for Using Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Techniques in the Handling of Discrimination and Other External Wrongdoing Issues (9 page(s), 7/8/2003)
    - ML030170360 - SECY-03-0115-Attachment 1 - Alternative Dispute Resolution Review Team Report (25 page(s), 1/17/2003)
    - ML022380017 - Comment of Terry Lodge on Proposed Use of ADR in NRC Enforcement Proceedings. (3 page(s), 8/16/2002)
    - ML022480006 - Comment of Marv Lewis re Alternate Dispute Resolution. (1 page(s), 8/23/2002)
    - ML023010621 - Comment from Ralph Beedle on Implementation of a Pilot Program Incorporating Alternative Dispute. (12 page(s), 10/21/2002)
    - ML022960240 - Comment from Donn C. Meindertsma Supporting the Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Discrimination Enforcement. (11 page(s), 10/21/2002)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
###### Editorial Note on Part 159

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93023, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 159.41 Antidumping duties.

Antidumping duties will be assessed in accordance with part 351, chapter III of this title.

[T.D. 80-271, 45 FR 75641, Nov. 17, 1980, as amended by CBP Dec. 12-21, 77 FR 73309, Dec. 10, 2012]