alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the period ended June 30, 2004 of MPW Industrial Services Group, Inc. (the Issuer) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date hereof.
I, Monte R. Black, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) |  | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                   
|------ |  | ------------------
|Dated: |  | September 24, 2004



/s/ Monte R. BlackMonte R. BlackChairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President
### nFRARTMENTO F MANSPORWIO N :0KL T

### OPERATION S M m b 

### 2 U P 3'

- 5 1 SERVE D AUGUS T 24 , 201 0 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C IN TH EMATTE RO F MILA N INSTITUT EO FCOSMETOLOG Y FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10SO000 9 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S NO . FAA-2010-062 9 NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designateda s Cas e No . 2010SO700101 ) ha s bee n assigne dt o Administrativ e La w Judg e Richar dC . Goodwin . Al l future pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r person s o n th e attache dServic e List .

inni e A . Yode r Chie f Administrativ e L a Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis ti • FA A Docke t No . CP10SO000 9 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Stephe n T . Chema , II , Esq . Pete r S . Leyton , Esq . Ritzert & Leyton , PC , Respondent' s Counse l 1135 0 Rando mHill s Road , Suit e 40 0 Fairfax , V A 2203 0 TEL : 703-934-266 0 FAX : 703-934-984 0 Gar y Yasud a Milan Institut e o f

Beauty 172 0 W . Walnu t

Avenu e Visalia , C A 9327 7 Andre aMichell e Harper , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l Southern Regio n Federal Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 2063 6 Atlanta , GA 3032 0 TEL : 404-305-520 0 FAX : 404-305-522 3 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r

202-366-213 9 Legal Assistan t 202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Hearin g Docket , Federa l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue, S . W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Buildin g - Roo m 2014, Washington

, D C 20591 , Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 .
458 P.2d 860

#### Pablo SEDILLO, Petitioner, v. Red DOW, Sheriff of Bernalillo County, New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 8924.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Oct. 1, 1969.

Ordered that petition for writ of habeas corpus be and the same is hereby denied for failure to show exhaustion of remedies in the district court.
### §25b. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §202(1), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1724

Section, Pub. L. 91–405, title II, §204(a), Sept. 22, 1970, 84 Stat. 852, related to application of certain Federal laws to Delegate to House of Representatives from District of Columbia.
### SUBCHAPTER II—INTERIM MANDATORY HEALTH STANDARDS
#### Freddie ROSS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 01-3862.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 1, 2002.

Filed May 6, 2002.

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Freddie Ross appeals the district court’s denial of his motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(e) for return of seized property. The court denied his motion without a hearing and without a response from the government. For the reasons stated below, we reverse.

First, the district court incorrectly concluded that Ross could not bring the motion after having been convicted. *See Thompson v. Covington,*47 F.3d 974, 975 (8th Cir.1995) (per curiam) (“Post-conviction filings for the return of property seized in connection with a criminal case are treated as civil equitable actions, and the district court where the claimant was tried has subject-matter jurisdiction ancillary to its criminal jurisdiction to hear the equitable action.”).

*276Second, the arguments advanced by the government on appeal—that Ross lacks standing as to one seizure, and that state authorities were responsible for the other seizure—are disputed by Ross and cannot be resolved on the basis of the existing record. The district court must conduct an evidentiary hearing to resolve the issues of material fact that are contested by the parties. *See*Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e) (“The court shall receive evidence on any issue of fact necessary to the decision of the motion.”); see, *e.g., Ball v. United States,*193 F.3d 998, 999-1000 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (district court erred by failing to take evidence before concluding that state rather than federal authorities were responsible for seizure).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
DONALD GILBERG, 

### etal., Plaintiffs,


### v. METLIFE, INC., 

### et al., Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs,


### v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., d/b/a U.S. Trust Bank ofAmerica Private Wealth Management, as successor in interestto U.S. Trust Company, N.A., Third-Party Defendant.ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Case No. 09-1826 (RJL) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Forthe reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this

# ~'1_~fAugust 2010, hereby ORDERED that 

## u.s. Trust's Motion to Dismiss Third-Party Complaint [#20] is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that defendants' Third-Party Complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED. 

# ,
(49111-13-P1

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Admioistration

airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes)

14 CFR Part 39

:>011- 0030

(Docket No. FAA-1Of&...•• • •• ; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-183-AD)

RlN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 and A31 0 Series Airplanes, and Mode

A300 84-600. B4-600R. and F4-600R Series Airplanes. and Model C4-605R Variant

fir

AGENCY: Federal Aviatlon Administration (FAA). DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaJcing (NPRM).

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for lhe producl

---

--

--

product. The MeAl describes. the unsafe condition as:

mandatory continuing airworthiness infonnation (MeAl) originated by an aviation

authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation

• • • • • • •

The actions contained in these revised documents, which inlroduce

more restrictive maintenance requirements andlOTairworthiness

limitations, have been identified as mandatory aClions for

continued airworthiness .•••.

The airworthiness limitations applicable to the Damage Tolerant

Airworthiness Limitation Items (DT ALl) arc currently listed in

Airbus ALl Documents, which are referenced in the A300. A31 O.

and AJOO-600 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) Part 2.

Airbus has recently revised the ALl Documents. which have been

approved by the European Aviation SafelY Agency (EASA) .

listed above that would supersede three exisling ADs. This proposed AD results from

FAA Form 1360·14.1 (6-89) OfFICIAL FILE copy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0               6,583,176
<SECURITIES>                                         0               5,000,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0               4,089,649
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                 101,213
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0              17,850,770
<PP&E>                                               0              13,500,467
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0               4,603,778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0              37,895,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0               4,196,027
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                   8,297
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0              28,305,548
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0              37,895,428
<SALES>                                      6,173,571              16,747,158
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,173,571              16,747,158
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,034,143              13,800,972
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (84,840)               (246,111)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,610                 (1,458)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             142,926                 663,785
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,079,732               2,529,970
<INCOME-TAX>                                   350,314                 809,590
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            729,418               1,720,380
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   729,418               1,720,380
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08                     .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08                     .22
        

</TABLE>
### §6626. Reimbursements to Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of Senate for equipment provided to Senators, etc., which has been lost, stolen, damaged, or otherwise unaccounted for; deposit of receipts

The Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate shall deposit in the United States Treasury for credit to the appropriation account, within the contingent fund of the Senate, for the "Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate", all moneys received by him as reimbursement for equipment provided to Senators, committee chairmen, and other officers and employees of the Senate, which has been lost, stolen, damaged, or otherwise unaccounted for.

(Pub. L. 98–367, title I, §5, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 475.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 117d of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Congressional Operations Appropriation Act, 1985, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1985.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0044 - Update of the Risk-Informed Regulation Implementation Plan

Accession Number: ML030310520

Date Released: Monday, April 7, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML030310411 - SECY-03-0044 - Update of the Risk-Infmored Regulation Implementation Plan (7 page(s), 3/21/2003)
    - ML030310430 - SECY-03-0044 - Attachment 1 - Tables of Accomplishments (4 page(s), 3/21/2003)
    - ML030310497 - SECY-03-0044 - Attachment 2 - Risk-Informed Regulation Implementation Plan (140 page(s), 1/1/2003)
    - ML030310507 - SECY-03-0044-Attachment 2: Part 1-4 - Risk-Informed Regulation Implementation Plan (1 page(s), 3/21/2003)
    - ML030310514 - SECY-03-0044-Attachment 2: Part 2, Figure 1-Layout and Format of Activity Descriptions (1 page(s), 3/21/2003)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
**Independent Accountants' Consent**

To Board of Directors
Warwick Community Bancorp, Inc:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No. 333-40773, No. 333-81467 and No. 333-103136 on Form S-8, of our report dated January 27, 2003, relating to the
consolidated statement of financial condition of Warwick Community Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, which report is incorporated by reference in the December 31, 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Warwick Community Bancorp, Inc.

The 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial statements of Warwick Community Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. Those auditors expressed an
unqualified opinion on those financial statements in their report dated January 29, 2002.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Short Hills, New Jersey
March 27, 2003
#### § 314.9 Recorded statement for Project Personal Property.

For all Projects which EDA determines involve the acquisition or improvement of significant items of Personal Property, including ships, machinery, equipment, removable fixtures, or structural components of buildings, the Recipient shall provide notice of the Federal Interest in all Project Personal Property by executing a Uniform Commercial Code Financing Statement (Form UCC-1, as provided by State law) or other statement of the Federal Interest in the Project Personal Property, acceptable in form and substance to EDA, which statement must be perfected and placed of record in accordance with applicable law, with continuances re-filed as appropriate. Whether or not a statement is required by EDA to be recorded, the Recipient must hold title to all Project Personal Property, except as otherwise provided in this part.

[82 FR 57062, Dec. 1, 2017]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. III-01-042 August 28, 2001

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC CITES CLINTON PLANT FOR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS VIOLATION

OF LOW TO MODERATE SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has determined that a violation of NRC emergency

preparedness regulations at the Clinton Nuclear Power Station near Clinton, Illinois, should be

characterized as "white," meaning that it is an issue of low to moderate importance to safety. The plant

is operated by Exelon Nuclear Generating Co.

During an inspection in May and June of this year, NRC inspectors found that the company had

failed to promptly correct deficiencies in the performance of control room communicators during drills

in late 1999 and in August of last year. The role of the communicators is to provide information to

offsite governmental agencies during a possible emergency.

Eleven members of the plant staff failed to meet the drill requirements in 1999, and ten failed

to meet the requirements in 2000, including three who had failed in the previous year.

Under its safety significance determination process, NRC officials classify certain conditions at

nuclear power plants as being one of four colors which delineate increasing levels of safety

significance, beginning with green and progressing to white, yellow or red. 

A preliminary "white" finding was described in an inspection report issued June 29 of this year.

The letter transmitting the report provided the company with an opportunity to either request a

regulatory conference to discuss this issue or to respond in writing. Exelon sent a written response,

indicating the company did not contest the characterization of the safety significance of this finding. 

In February of this year, Exelon determined that it had not taken sufficient action to address the

previous drill failures. The workers were retrained and retested. All but three successfully

demonstrated they could make the required notifications. Those three were removed from the

emergency response organization. These actions were reviewed during the NRCís inspection.

The company has increased the depth of its training program and increased the frequency to

semiannual training to preclude future drill failures. and the company revised its notification

procedures.

A white finding may result in future NRC inspections, but sufficient information was gathered

in the June inspection at the Clinton plant to determine that the corrective actions were effective. The 
performance of the control room communicators will be reviewed in future emergency preparedness

inspections.

# # #
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-124 October 18, 2001

THREAT TO THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR PLANT DEEMED NON-CREDIBLE; 

 NRC MONITORING CONTINUES AND WEBSITE RESTORED 

A potential terrorist threat directed at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant near Harrisburg,

Pennsylvania, has been determined by the intelligence community to be non-credible. 

However, when the threat came into the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, it was taken seriously,

resulting in a number of security measures taken by TMIís licensee, Exelon, as well as by other Federal

and State authorities. 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is continuing to closely monitor security at all nuclear

reactors and nuclear fuel facilities around the country. 

Contrary to some rumors, the agency has not ordered any plants to shut down for security

reasons. Some plants are, as usual, shut down for normal refueling and maintenance. 

All nuclear power plants have remained at the highest level of security since September 11. 

Subsequently, the agency has advised all of its licensees of additional actions considered prudent and

appropriate to strengthen security further. The NRC is closely monitoring the actions being taken to

enhance security.

In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks and the continuing uncertainty about future terrorist

intentions, the agency is conducting a comprehensive review of its safeguards and physical security

program at the direction of Chairman Richard A. Meserve, with the support of the Commission. 

On September 26, Chairman Meserve sent letters to the governors of 40 states that have nuclear

power plants or other NRC-regulated nuclear facilities, advising them that it would be prudent to

establish clear liaison between nuclear facilities and state authorities in the event that state security

forces might be needed to augment security. Clear lines of communication among the State, the NRC

and licensees have been established.
The NRC continues to maintain close contact with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, other

intelligence agencies and other law enforcement, military and state authorities to assess the latest threat

information and to discuss current conditions and plans.

NRCís website, which was closed down last week, was restored Wednesday with a limited

amount of information. Taking down the agency website was a precaution to make sure it did not

contain information that could be helpful to terrorists. As the agencyís review continues, other

information and documents deemed non-sensitive will be added to the site.

###
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 743 

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to remove the prohibition 

on States and territories against lowering their taxes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2021 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. 

SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. DAINES, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. 

RISCH, and Mr. THUNE) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to remove 

the prohibition on States and territories against lowering 

their taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Fiscal Flexibility 

5 Act of 2021’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 743 IS

1 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTION OF USE OF 

2 CORONAVIRUS STATE FISCAL RECOVERY 

3 FUNDS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 602(c) 

5 of the Social Security Act, as added by section 9901 of 

6 the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, is amended to 

7 read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(2) FURTHER RESTRICTION ON USE OF

9 FUNDS.—No State or territory may use funds made 

10 available under this section for deposit into any pen11 sion fund.’’. 

12 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 602 of 

13 such Act is further amended— 

14 (1) in subsection (d)(2)(A), by striking ‘‘, in15 cluding, in the case of a State or a territory, all 

16 modifications to the State’s or territory’s tax rev17 enue sources during the covered period’’; 

18 (2) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘such sub19 section,’’ and all that follows through the period and 

20 inserting ‘‘such subsection.’’; and 

21 (3) in subsection (g)— 

22 (A) by striking paragraph (1); and 

23 (B) by redesignating paragraphs (2) 

24 through (7) as paragraphs (1) through (6), re25 spectively. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 743 IS

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall take effect as if included in the enact3 ment of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS