alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 201.41 Public inspection and copying of records; applicable fees. ( a ) The Secretary shall promptly make available to interested members of the public the transcript or electronic recording of the discussion of any item on the agenda of a Commission meeting or of any item of the testimony of any witness received at the meeting, except for such item or items of such discussion or testimony as the Secretary determines to contain information which may be withheld for reasons specified in paragraphs (b) ( 1 ) through ( 9 ) of § 201.36. The determination of the Secretary shall be in conformity with a prior vote of the Commission under § 201.36(d) to close a portion or portions of a meeting.
( b ) Public inspection of electronic recordings, transcripts, or minutes of Commission meetings shall take place at the United States International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. A room is designated by the Office of the Secretary and tape recorders with earphones are provided by the Commission for public-inspection purposes when proceedings are recorded on tape.
( c ) ( 1 ) The Secretary shall provide any person with copies of transcripts, minutes of Commission meetings, or transcriptions of electronic recordings of Commission meetings, which disclose the identity of each speaker, at the actual cost of transcription or duplication.
( 2 ) The Secretary shall not include items of discussion or testimony determined by the Secretary to contain information which may be withheld from the public for the reasons specified in paragraphs (b) (1) through (9) of § 201.36 in the copies furnished to the public in accordance with paragraph (c)(1) of this section. The determination of the Secretary shall be in conformity with a prior vote of the Commission under § 201.36(d) to close a portion or portions of a meeting.
### **CHAPTER 1—UNITED STATES BUREAU OF MINES**

Sec.
1.
United States Bureau of Mines; establishment; director; experts and other employees.
1a.
Transfer of activities, employees, records, etc., from Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce to the United States Bureau of Mines.
2.
Performance of duties in absence of director.
3.
Duties of United States Bureau of Mines.
4.
Investigation of lignite coal and peat.
4a.
Omitted.
4b.
Cooperation with individuals, municipalities, etc.; contracts with owners; agreements as to prices.
4c.
Investigation of sub-bituminous and lignite coal.
4d.
Plants, machinery, and equipment.
4e.
Omitted.
4f to 4 o.
Transferred.
5.
Reports of investigations.
6.
Personal interest of director and members of Bureau in mines.
7.
Fees for tests or investigations.
8.
Additional mining experiment stations and mine safety stations authorized.
9.
Acceptance of lands from States.
10.
Headquarters of mine rescue cars; site for experimental work; leases and donations.
11, 12.
Omitted or Repealed.
13.
Research laboratory for utilization of anthracite coal; establishment and maintenance.
14.
Acquisition of land; cooperation with other agencies.
15.
Repealed.
16.
Research laboratory for utilization of anthracite coal; establishment of advisory committee; composition; functions; appointment.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-02-032 June 26, 2002

CONTACT: Breck Henderson E-mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

NRC CITES COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION FOR FINDING

OF LOW TO MODERATE SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued its final determination that a May

inspection finding at Columbia Generating Station is of low to moderate safety significance and will be

characterized as “white.” The nuclear plant, near Richland, Wash., is operated by Energy Northwest.

During a refueling outage that ended in June 2001 Energy Northwest installed 16 new safetyrelated and six important-to-safety electrical circuit breakers. After the replacement, a part in the

breakers called a mechanism-operated cell switch, failed or malfunctioned, which affected the

operation of equipment on four occasions between June 2001 and February this year. Analysis of the

failures determined that Energy Northwest had not incorporated the manufacturer’s maintenance

requirements to lubricate the cell switch in its maintenance procedures.

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear power plants with a color

coded significance determination process which classifies regulatory findings as being in one of four

color categories: green, white, yellow, or red in increasing order of regulatory safety significance.

In addition to a white inspection finding, the NRC has issued a Notice of Violation to Energy

Northwest for failing to verify the design adequacy of the new equipment and to promptly correct the

breaker failures and malfunctions. Energy Northwest will be required to submit a written statement

within 30 days explaining the reason for the violation and corrective actions taken. 

The white finding may require additional NRC inspection at Columbia Generating Station.

###
#### Yonkers Lodge No. 797 Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks of the United States of America et al., Respondents, v. Board of Education of the City of Yonkers et al., Appellants.

Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Mossko, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-60672

Summary Calendar

SILVIA MARLENE ORTEGA-HERNANDEZ; SILVIA YAMILETH 

RODRIGUEZ-ORTEGA,

Petitioners

v.

MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A206 846 102

BIA No. A206 846 103

Before KING, SOUTHWICK, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Silvia Marlene Ortega-Hernandez and her daughter Silvia Yamileth 

Rodriguez-Ortega, are natives and citizens of El Salvador who entered the 

United States without being admitted or paroled. They have filed a petition 

seeking review of the decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 21, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-60672 Document: 00514771099 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/21/2018
No. 17-60672

2

dismissing their appeal from the immigration judge’s (IJ’s) denial of their 

applications for asylum and withholding of removal. 

Because the BIA agreed with the IJ’s determinations regarding the 

petitioners’ eligibility for immigration relief, both decisions are reviewable. 

Wang v. Holder, 569 F.3d 531, 536 (5th Cir. 2009). This court reviews findings 

of fact for substantial evidence. Id.

Although the BIA erred by concluding that the IJ found that the 

petitioners failed to establish a nexus between the feared persecution and a 

protected ground, substantial evidence supports the denial of asylum and 

withholding of removal. See id. The IJ’s finding that the petitioners failed to 

demonstrate an objective fear of persecution is supported by substantial 

evidence, and the record does not compel a contrary conclusion. See id. The 

petitioners complain that the BIA and IJ failed to consider the four-factor test, 

but the petitioners fail to demonstrate that Mara 18 members have the 

inclination to punish their family members. See Zhao v. Gonzales, 404 F.3d 

295, 307 (5th Cir. 2005). While the petitioners contend that the BIA addressed 

only whether the Salvadoran government was willing, and not whether it was 

able, to control criminal gangs, as long as a government is taking reasonable 

steps to protect its citizens from harm in question, such efforts are sufficient 

to defeat a claim that it is either unable or unwilling to control private parties.

Accordingly, the petitioners fail to show that they were eligible for 

asylum. See Wang, 569 F.3d at 536. The petitioners have also failed to meet 

the higher standard of showing that they are entitled to withholding of 

removal. See Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 906 (5th Cir. 2002). The petition 

for review is DENIED.

 Case: 17-60672 Document: 00514771099 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/21/2018
Exhibit
32.2


Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the annual report of Mexoro Minerals Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, as filed with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:
 
 1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and
 
 2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Mario
Ayub
 Mario
Ayub, Acting Principal Financial Officer
 
 June 12,
2008
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFiber-optic three axis magnetometer prototype developmentThe goal of this research program was to develop a high sensitivity, fiber optic, interferometric, three-axis magnetometer for interplanetary spacecraft applications. Dynamics Technology, Inc. (DTI) has successfully integrated a low noise, high bandwidth interferometer with high sensitivity metallic glass transducers. Also, DTI has developed sophisticated signal processing electronics and complete data acquisition, filtering, and display software. The sensor was packaged in a compact, low power and weight unit which facilitates deployment. The magnetic field sensor had subgamma sensitivity and a dynamic range of 10(exp 5) gamma in a 10 Hz bandwidth. Furthermore, the vector instrument exhibited the lowest noise level when only one axis was in operation. A system noise level of 1 gamma rms was observed in a 1 Hz bandwidth. However, with the other two channels operating, the noise level increased by about one order of magnitude. Higher system noise was attributed to cross-channel interference among the dither fields.Document ID19930006522Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsWang, Thomas D.*(Dynamics Technology, Inc. Torrance, CA, United States)*Mccomb, David G.*(Dynamics Technology, Inc. Torrance, CA, United States)*Kingston, Bradley R.*(Dynamics Technology, Inc. Torrance, CA, United States)*Dube, C. Michael*(Dynamics Technology, Inc. Torrance, CA, United States)*Poehls, Kenneth A.*(Dynamics Technology, Inc. Torrance, CA, United States)*Wanser, Keith*(Dynamics Technology, Inc. Torrance, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1989Subject CategoryOpticsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-191882DT-8619-89007NAS 1.26:191882Accession Number93N15711Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS7-1001CONTRACT_GRANT: SBIR-08.10-5433Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930006522.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-116 September 5, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

INSPECTIONS FIND ACCESS AUTHORIZATION ADEQUATE

AT 3 NORTHEASTERN PLANTS; REGULATIONS BEING REVIEWED

Special Nuclear Regulatory Commission security inspections

at three northeastern nuclear plants have found that their access

authorization programs meet regulatory requirements.

The agency staff is now reviewing the findings to determine

whether any actions are warranted, including changes in NRC

requirements, which could affect security programs at all

licensed nuclear power plants.

NRC scheduled the inspections after learning that Carl

Drega--who killed four people in New Hampshire before being

killed in a police shootout in August--had worked at the three

plants at various times as a contractor employee.

Inspections were conducted August 26-29 at Vermont Yankee in

Vernon, Vt.; at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station in Plymouth, Mass.;

and at Indian Point Unit 3 in Buchanan, N.Y. The purpose was to

determine if the access authorization programs, as implemented,

identified information that should have precluded Drega from

being granted unescorted access.

At each of the sites, inspectors found that access

authorization programs met NRC regulatory requirements. In

addition, the inspectors did not find any information licensees

used in processing the individual that should have precluded them

from granting unescorted access to the secured portions of the

plants.

Copies of the inspection reports are available from the

Region I Public Affairs Office, or on the NRC’s web page:

<http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports>.

#
#### § 144.3 Allowance for damage.

No abatement or allowance of duties shall be made on account of damage, loss, or deterioration of the merchandise while in warehouse, except as provided for by law (see part 158 of this chapter).
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone 301/415-820

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

__________________________________________________________

CORRECTION: The address for meeting location is 

1 Superman Square, 

No. III-03-035a

 April 22, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE AT HONEYWELL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Honeywell Specialty Chemicals

officials on Wednesday, April 23, to discuss the results of the agency’s assessment of

performance at the company’s uranium processing facility, located in Metropolis, Illinois.

The meeting will be held at 10 a.m. at the Massac County Courthouse, at 1 Superman

Square, in Metropolis, Illinois. The public is invited to observe the meeting and will have an

opportunity to make comments and ask questions of the NRC staff before the meeting is

adjourned.

This performance review, which covers the period of February 1, 2001, through January

31 of this year, focused on four major arenas: safety operations, safeguards, radiological controls

and facility support. The NRC staff concluded that the Honeywell facility staff performed well in

the areas of safeguards, radiological controls and facility support, and identified no areas for

improvement. In the arena of safety operations, the staff performance was evaluated as adequate

but needing improvement in implementation of regulatory requirements.

The meeting will focus on the company’s plans to address the NRC’s concerns and the

recent turnover in senior management positions at the facility.

The performance review is available from the NRC’s Region III Office of Public Affairs,

the NRC Public Document Room at 1-800-397-4209 and in the agency’s ADAMS electronic
reading room at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html. To locate the document,

enter the accession number ML030860438.

###
Exhibit 10.13 - Assignment - Stan Abrams

ASSIGNMENT

     WHEREAS, Stan E. Abrams, Is the sole owner, by assignment; of the Letters
Patents Of the United States of America, the United States pending application,
and the European application as identified on the EXHIBIT attached hereto, and

     WHEREAS, Nathaniel Energy Corporation, a corporation of the state of
Nevada, having a place of business at P.O. Box 69, Castle Rock, CO 80104 is
desirous of acquiring the entire right, title and interest in and to the same:

     NOW, THEREFORE, to all whom it may concern, be It known that for and in
consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) paid and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Stan E. Abrams has
sold, assigned, transferred and sat over, and by these presents does sell,
assign, transfer and set over, unto the said Nathaniel Energy Corporation, the
Letters Patents, U.S. pending application and European application as listed on
the attached EXHIBIT; the same to be held and enjoyed by the said Nathaniel
Energy Corporation, Its successors, assigns or other legal representatives, for
its own use, and for the use of its successors, assigns or other legal
representatives, to the end of the term or terms for which said Letters Patents
are granted or may be reissued, as fully and entirely as the same would have
been held and enjoyed by said Nathaniel Energy Corporation had this assignment
and sale not be made.

     AND I do hereby authorize and request the Commissioner of Patent and
Trademarks of the United States of America to issue any and all United States
patents which may be granted upon said United States applications or any of
them, or upon said invention or any part thereof, to said corporation.

     This assignment to Nathaniel Energy Corporation shall become null and void
In the event Stan E. Abrams or his son, Brett Abrams, is not an officer and
director of said corporation or in the event said corporation becomes bankrupt
or insolvent.

IN WITNESS HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal this _23rd_
day of _April_, 2002.

                         _/s/_______________
                         Stan E. Abrams

State of _Colorado_
County of _Douglas_

     On this _23rd_ day of April, 2002, before me a Notary Public, personally
appeared the above-named, Stan E. Abrams, personally known to me and known to me
to be the one who executed the foregoing instrument and subscribed the same in
my presence, and acknowledged the same to be his free act and deed.

Maureen M. Dunn
__________________
Notary Public
My commission expires 01/02/05 (SEAL)
§ 149.6 Entry and entry summary documentation and Importer Security Filing submitted via a single electronic transmission. If the Importer Security Filing is filed pursuant to § 149.2 of this part via the same electronic transmission as entry or entry/entry summary documentation pursuant to § 142.3 of this chapter, the importer is only required to provide the following fields once to be used for Importer Security Filing, entry, or entry/entry summary purposes, as applicable: ( a ) Importer of record number;
( b ) Consignee number;
( c ) Country of origin; and
( d ) Commodity HTSUS number if this number is provided at the 10-digit level.
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 6

- 00 165

- C V



### ____________________

MICHAEL DAVID BELLOW JR.
, Appellant

V.

LEEANN MCQUADE , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 172nd Di strict Court
Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No

. E

- 198,048

________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

Appellant, Michael David Bellow Jr., filed a notice of bankruptcy. 1 See Tex.

R. App. P. 8.1. This proceeding is abated for administrative purposes only, and will

be treated as a closed case unless timely reinstated by proper motion. See Tex. R.

App. P. 8.2.

ORDER ENTERED October 13 , 201 6

. PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson , JJ.

1 We take judicial notice of the notice that Bellow filed in his Appeal

Number 09

- 16

- 00252

- CV, Michael David Bellow Jr. v. Courtney Bellow

.
#### Charles A. Brown, Plaintiff, v. Agnes Brown, Defendant.

Motion denied, without costs. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
#### § 12.106 Importation prohibited.

Except as provided in section 12.107, no pre-Columbian monumental or architectural sculpture or mural which is exported (whether or not such exportation is to the United States) from its country of origin after June 1, 1973, may be imported into the United States.

[T.D. 78-273, 43 FR 36055, Aug. 15, 1978]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GLOBAL
INDUSTRIES, LTD.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          17,287
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,022
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               177,322
<PP&E>                                         527,077
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 775,902
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          102,274
<BONDS>                                        249,977
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           926
<OTHER-SE>                                     390,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   775,902
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,740
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,594
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,184)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (3,166)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,018)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          783
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,801)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.07)


</TABLE>
#### § 19.45 Transfer of merchandise, approval and method.

Approval of the application by the port director shall serve as a permit to transfer the container and its contents to the station. Except when the container station operator is moving the merchandise to his own station by his own vehicle, the merchandise may only be transferred to a container station by a bonded cartman or bonded carrier. The station operator, cartman or carrier shall receipt for the merchandise on both copies of the application.

[T.D. 74-54, 39 FR 4876, Feb. 18, 1974]
#### § 190.122 Procedure.

Other provisions of this part relating to direct identification manufacturing drawback will apply to claims for drawback under this subpart insofar as applicable to and not inconsistent with the provisions of this subpart.
### §75. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–310, title II, §220(b), (c), June 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 204

Section, R.S. §§58, 59; act Mar. 2, 1895, ch. 177, §5, 28 Stat. 807, required Clerk of House of Representatives to give a bond in the sum of $20,000.