alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FORM OF 302 CERTIFICATION

                                 EXHIBIT 31

                               CERTIFICATIONS

I, Steven B. Chotin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fund America
Investors Corporation II;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls, over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and


b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.




Date:    May 13, 2005                            /s/ Steven B. Chotin
                                                ---------------------------
                                                Steven B. Chotin
                                                Chief Executive Officer
### §4c. Investigation of sub-bituminous and lignite coal

The United States Bureau of Mines, under the general direction of the Secretary of the Interior, is authorized to conduct investigations, studies, and experiments on its own initiative and in cooperation with individuals, State institutions, laboratories, and other organizations, with a view to (1) the development of a commercially practicable carbonization method of processing sub-bituminous and lignite coal so as to convert such coal into an all-purpose fuel, to provide fertilizers, and obtain such other byproducts thereof as may be commercially valuable; (2) the development of efficient methods, equipment, and devices for burning lignite or char therefrom; and (3) determining and developing methods for more efficient utilization of such sub-bituminous and lignite coal for purposes of generating electric power.

(May 15, 1936, ch. 397, §1, 49 Stat. 1275; Pub. L. 102–285, §10(b), May 18, 1992, 106 Stat. 172.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"United States Bureau of Mines" substituted in text for "Bureau of Mines" pursuant to section 10(b) of Pub. L. 102–285, set out as a note under section 1 of this title. For provisions relating to closure and transfer of functions of the United States Bureau of Mines, see Transfer of Functions note set out under section 1 of this title.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-69 October 5, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC CITES MALLINCKRODT, INC. FOR VIOLATIONS AT HARRISBURG, PA,

FACILITY; PROPOSES $2,750 FINE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has cited Mallinckrodt, Inc. for two violations of

NRC requirements at its Harrisburg, Pa., facility that prepares and distributes radioactive

pharmaceutical products to regional hospitals and clinics. The apparent violations stem from radiation

exposure to the hand of one worker in excess of the NRC’s regulatory limit. The exposure occurred

earlier this year. The NRC has proposed a $2,750 fine.

On June 30, Mallinckrodt notified the NRC that a worker at the Harrisburg facility received an

exposure of greater than 60 rem to one hand during the period from February to May of this year.

(Rem is a measure of radiation.) The NRC dose limit for exposure to an extremity is 50 rem per year.

The NRC conducted an inspection at the facility on July 5 to look into the circumstances

associated with the exposure. Based on the results of that inspection and information gathered from

the company during an August 30 predecisional enforcement conference and subsequent

correspondence, the NRC has cited Mallinckrodt for two violations: failure to ensure radiation

exposure to one of the workers was below regulatory limits and failure to perform adequate surveys to

preclude such an exposure.

Mallinckrodt has 30 days to pay the fine or to protest it. If the fine is protested and

subsequently imposed by the NRC staff, the company may request a hearing.

###
MASE MEBANE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Miami Division

CASE NO.: 20-cv-61550-RUIZ/STRAUSS

VASSEL VIRGO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CARNIVAL CORPORATION, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

The Parties, by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to the Court’s Order 

Administratively Closing Case [ECF No. 25], file this Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with

Prejudice. The terms and conditions of the settlement in this matter are confidential. Each Party 

shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. See attached proposed Order Granting Joint Stipulation 

of Dismissal.

Respectfully submitted, 

FENSTERSHEIB LAW GROUP, P.A.

Attorney for Plaintiff

520 West Hallandale Beach Blvd.

Hallandale Beach, FL 33009

Tel: (954) 456-2488

Fax: (954) 867-1844

By: /s/ Jason R. Manocchio

JASON R. MANOCCHIO

Florida Bar No. 92477

jason@fenstersheib.com

jm-pleasdings@fenstersheib.com

MASE MEBANE, P.A. 

Attorneys for Defendant 

2601 South Bayshore Drive, Suite 800 

Miami, Florida 33133 

Tel: (305) 377-3770 

Fax: (305) 377-0080

By: /s/ William R. Seitz

WILLIAM R. SEITZ 

Florida Bar No. 73928 

wseitz@maselaw.com

Case 0:20-cv-61550-RAR Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2021 Page 1 of 1
#### Jaylo Realty Corp., Appellant, v. Bobnor Realty Corp., Respondent.

Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents as follows: Plaintiff’s contention is that plaintiff used and occupied the premises for business purposes during the period of alterations and that *“*the alterations were in fact its business ”, On the admissions made by plaintiff in which no such state of facts was set forth or claimed the court properly dismissed pursuant to section 476 of the Civil Practice Act. It is clear that plaintiff’s possession was constructive only and the principle of *WMCA, Inc.,*v. *Blockfront Realty Corp.*(272 App. Div. 800) is applicable. I dissent and vote to affirm. [See *ante,*p. 646; 276 App. Div. 893.]
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**ETHAN ALLEN INTERIORS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES**

 

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, M. Farooq Kathwari, hereby certify that the March 31, 2011 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed by Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (the “Company”), which contains the Company’s financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| /s/ M. Farooq Kathwari |   | Chairman, President and   |
|------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
| (M. Farooq Kathwari)   |   | Chief   Executive Officer |

 

May 5, 2011

 

----
' + theLink + '
#### Luise Mohr, Respondent, v. Wilbert A. Minerd, Appellant.

Present —• Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1393

To ensure that tax-exempt status and other benefits afforded under Operation 

Enduring Freedom are also provided to United States Armed Forces 

personnel in Israel. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2003

Mr. JANKLOW (for himself, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. MARIO

DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. MCNULTY, and Mr. PLATTS) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 

Means 

A BILL

To ensure that tax-exempt status and other benefits afforded 

under Operation Enduring Freedom are also provided 

to United States Armed Forces personnel in Israel.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Armed Forces Tax 

5 Fairness and Justice Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 1393 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF BENEFITS UNDER OPERATION EN2 DURING FREEDOM. 

3 For purposes of all benefits afforded, as a result of 

4 the Operational Deployment Order issued by the President 

5 in January 2003, to United States Armed Forces per6 sonnel participating in Operation Enduring Freedom, the 

7 geographic area encompassed by the applicability of those 

8 benefits shall be deemed to include Israel. 

9 SEC. 3. RETROACTIVE EFFECTIVE DATE. 

10 Section 2 shall take effect as of February 1, 2003.

Æ
### §123c. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 123c was editorially reclassified as section 6618 of this title.
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 4
p060702.eng.sanitized

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 06-0702

Focus Ready Draft 8/24/2006

ENGINEER: ARNOLD \ DTN

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: Label: No

CRSS (08/17/2006):

Chemical Name: 

S-H20: 0.0032 g/L @

VP: 8.9E-4 torr @

MW: 284.53 %<500 %<1000

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns) (08/18/2006):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P1B3T2 .

Health: 2-3 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation, Ingestion, XB

Testing (Testing desired)

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC =2ppb), XB Testing

(Testing desired)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3C

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

None.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 

1) # of workers exposed: >1000? 

2) >100 workers with >10 mg/day inhalation exposure: 

3) (a) >100 workers w/1-10 mg/day inh. exp. & >100 days/yr: 

 (b) Routine Dermal Cont: >250 workers & >100 days/yr: 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 06-0702

Number of Sites/ Location: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 4
p060702.eng.sanitized

Days/yr: 

Basis: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may

coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same

medium.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis: .

Inhalation:

Dermal:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 06-0702

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Basis: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may

coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same

medium.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis: 

Inhalation:

Dermal:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 06-0702

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 4
p060702.eng.sanitized

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Basis: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may

coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same

medium.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 06-0702

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Basis: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may

coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same

medium.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis: 

Inhalation:

Dermal:

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 4
### §6534. Compensation of Assistant Secretary of Senate

The Assistant Secretary of the Senate may be paid at a maximum annual rate of compensation not to exceed $39,000.

(Pub. L. 91–145, Dec. 12, 1969, 83 Stat. 340; Pub. L. 93–371, §4, Aug. 13, 1974, 88 Stat. 429; Pub. L. 94–59, title I, §105, July 25, 1975, 89 Stat. 275; Pub. L. 116–94, div. E, title II, §212(a)(3)(A), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2775.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 61a–3 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–94 repealed Pub. L. 94–59, §105. See 1975 Amendment note below.

1975—Pub. L. 94–59, which substituted "$39,000" for "$37,620", effective July 1, 1975, was repealed by Pub. L. 116–94. See above.

1974—Pub. L. 93–371 substituted provision setting maximum annual rate of compensation of Assistant Secretary at not to exceed $37,620, for provisions authorizing Secretary of Senate to fix the compensation of Assistant Secretary at not to exceed $11,826 per annum, effective July 1, 1974.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Assistant Secretary of the Senate deemed successor in references to Chief Clerk of Senate in all laws, rules, resolutions, and orders, effective July 1, 1971, under provisions of Pub. L. 92–51, July 9, 1971, 85 Stat. 125.

#### Effective Date of 2019 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–94 effective on the later of the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2020, or the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after Dec. 20, 2019, see section 212(c) of Pub. L. 116–94, set out as a note under section 282b of this title.

#### 1974 Adjustment in Compensation Not To Supersede Adjustments in Compensation or Limitations by President Pro Tempore of the Senate

Adjustment in compensation by Pub. L. 93–371 not to supersede order of President pro tempore of the Senate authorizing higher rate of compensation or any authority of the President pro tempore to adjust rates of compensation or limitations under section 4 of the Federal Pay Comparability Act of 1970, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–371, set out in part as a note under section 273 of this title.

#### Increases in Compensation

Increases in compensation of Assistant Secretary of the Senate under authority of Federal Salary Act of 1967 (Pub. L. 90–206) and Federal Pay Comparability Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 91–656), see section 4571 of this title, and Salary Directives of President pro tempore of the Senate, set out as notes under that section.
§ 210.17 Other failure to act and default. Failures to act other than the defaults listed in § 210.16 may provide a basis for the presiding administrative law judge or the Commission to draw adverse inferences and to issue findings of fact, conclusions of law, determinations (including a determination on violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930), and orders that are adverse to the party who fails to act. Such failures include, but are not limited to: ( a ) Failure to respond to a motion that materially alters the scope of the investigation or a related proceeding;
( b ) Failure to respond to a motion for temporary relief pursuant to § 210.59;
( c ) Failure to respond to a motion for summary determination under § 210.18;
( d ) Failure to appear at a hearing before the administrative law judge after filing a written response to the complaint or motion for temporary relief, or failure to appear at a hearing before the Commission;
( e ) Failure to file a brief or other written submission requested by the administrative law judge or the Commission during an investigation or a related proceeding;
( f ) Failure to respond to a petition for review of an initial determination, a petition for reconsideration of an initial determination, or an application for interlocutory review of an administrative law judge's order; and
( g ) Failure to participate in temporary relief bond forfeiture proceedings under § 210.70.
( h ) *Default by notice.* If a respondent has filed a response to the complaint or notice of investigation under § 210.13 of this chapter, the respondent may still file a notice of intent to default with the presiding administrative law judge at any time before the filing of the final initial determination. The administrative law judge shall issue an initial determination finding the respondent in default upon the filing of a notice of intent to default. Such default will be treated in the same manner as any other failure to act under this section. The filing of a notice of intent to default does not require the administrative law judge to issue an order to show cause as to why the respondent should not be found in default.
The presiding administrative law judge or the Commission may take action under this rule sua sponte or in response to the motion of a party. [59 FR 39039, Aug. 1, 1994, as amended at 78 FR 23482, Apr. 19, 2013]
United States District Court

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

DALLAS DIVISION

§

§

§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-CV-1460-S 

§

DANIEL GARZA et al. 

v. 

C.R. BARD INCORPORATED et al. §

ORDER

To assist the Court, counsel for all parties shall complete the form attached hereto as 

Exhibit A for each Plaintiff in this action. The parties shall file their completed forms on or before

July 22, 2020. 

SO ORDERED.

SIGNED July 16, 2020.

Case 9:20-cv-81315-WPD Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/16/2020 Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT A

1. Plaintiff’s full name: 

2. Plaintiff’s date of birth:

3. Type of device (e.g., Recovery, G2, G2X, Eclipse, Denali, etc.):

4. Date of implant:

5. Alleged physical injury or injuries (check all that apply):

□ Tilt

□ Perforation

□ Fracture

□ Migration

□ Unretrievable

□ Other (specify)

6. Was removal attempted? (If yes, proceed to question 7. If no, proceed to question 8.)

7. How many times was removal attempted?

i. For each attempt, answer the following questions:

1. Date of attempted removal:

2. Method of attempted removal (e.g., percutaneous, open surgical removal, 

etc.):

3. Was the attempt successful? 

a. If no, have future attempts been deemed too risky?

4. Do any struts remain in the body? If so, include the location of the strut(s).

8. Please provide a breakdown of currently available medical expenses claimed as a result of 

the injury. 

9. Other comments:

Case 9:20-cv-81315-WPD Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/16/2020 Page 2 of 2
### SUBCHAPTER I—REGULATION OF EXPLORATION AND COMMERCIAL RECOVERY BY UNITED STATES CITIZENS
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE 

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING 

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

Ayree Henderson, Respondent, 

v. 

State of South Carolina, Petitioner. 

Appellate Case No. 2014-001126 

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS 

Appeal from Richland County 

G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge 

Memorandum Opinion No. 2015-MO-063 

Heard September 23, 2015 – Filed October 28, 2015 

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson and Assistant Attorney 

General Megan H. Jameson, both of Columbia, for 

Petitioner. 

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of 

Columbia, for Respondent. 
PER CURIAM: We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals' 

opinion in Henderson v. State, Op. No. 2014-UP-122 (S.C. Ct. App. filed March 

19, 2014). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED 

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., 

concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

# AGENCY:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of opportunity for public comment; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects a notice appearing in the                         **Federal Register**                         on October 14, 2004 (69 FR 61049), that requests public comment on a guidance document for licensees on establishing and maintaining a safety conscious work environment. This action is necessary to correct an erroneous Web site.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Lisamarie Jarriel, Agency Allegations Advisor, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, (301) 415-8529, email                         *LLJ@nrc.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On page 61049, in the second column, in the second complete paragraph, in the last sentence, the Web site is corrected to read,                     *“http://www.nrc.gov/​what-we-do/​regulatory/​allegations/​scwe-guide.html.”*

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day of October 2004.
      ( print page 62730)    
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Michael T. Lesar,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-24015 Filed 10-26-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P