alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23741]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Committee for the Preservation of the White House; Notice of 
Public Meeting

AGENCY: Department of the Interior, National Park Service.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act that a meeting of the Committee for the Preservation of 
the White House will be held at the White House at 11 a.m. on 
Wednesday, November 17, 2004.

DATES: November 17, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Executive Secretary, Committee for the 
Preservation of the White House, 1100 Ohio Drive, SW., Washington, DC 
20242. (202) 619-6344.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: It is expected that the meeting agenda will 
include policies, goals, and long range plans. The meeting will be 
open, but subject to appointment and security clearance requirements. 
Clearance information, which includes full name, date of birth and 
social security number, must be received by November 10, 2004. Due to 
the present mail delays being experienced, clearance information should 
be faxed to (202) 619-6353 in order to assure receipt by deadline. 
Inquiries may be made by calling the Committee for the Preservation of 
the White House between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. weekdays at (202) 619-6344. 
Written comments may be sent to the Executive Secretary, Committee for 
the Preservation of the White House, 1100 Ohio Drive, SW., Washington, 
DC 20242.

    Dated: October 8, 2004.
Ann Bowman Smith,
Executive Secretary, Committee for the Preservation of the White House.
[FR Doc. 04-23741 Filed 10-21-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-54-M
§ 207.103 Charging letter. ( a ) *Contents of charging letter.* Each charged party shall be served by the Commission with a copy of a charging letter and any accompanying motion for interim measures, as provided for in 19 CFR 207.106. The charging letter shall include: ( 1 ) Allegations concerning a prohibited act;
( 2 ) A citation to § 207.100 of this subpart, for a listing of sanctions that may be imposed for a prohibited act;
( 3 ) A statement that a proceeding has been initiated and that an APA hearing will be held before an administrative law judge;
( 4 ) A statement that the charged party or his or her attorney may request the issuance of an appropriate administrative protective order to obtain access to the information upon which the charge is based;
( 5 ) A statement that the charged party has a right to retain an attorney at the charged party's own expense for purposes of representation; and
( 6 ) A statement that the charged party has the right to request in the response described in § 207.104 of this subpart that the proceedings remain confidential to the extent practicable.
( b ) *Service of charging letter.* ( 1 ) The charging letter shall be served in a double envelope. The inner envelope shall indicate that it is to be opened only by the addressee. Service of a charging letter shall be made by one of the following methods: ( i ) Mailing a copy by registered or certified mail addressed to the charged party at the party's last known permanent address; or
( ii ) Personal service; or
( iii ) Any other method acceptable under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
( 2 ) Service shall be evidenced by a certificate of service signed by the person making such service.
( c ) *Confidentiality of charging letter.* Prior to entry of an order by the administrative law judge under § 207.105 of this subpart, the charging letter will be confidential and disclosed only to necessary Commission staff and the charged parties.
( d ) *Amendment of charging letter.* ( 1 ) At any time after proceedings have been initiated, the investigative attorney may move for leave to amend or withdraw the charging letter.
( 2 ) If the administrative law judge determines that the charging letter should be amended to include additional parties, the judge shall issue a recommended determination to that effect. The Commission shall review the recommended determination, and issue a determination granting or denying the motion to amend the charging letter to include additional parties.
( 3 ) Upon motion, the administrative law judge may grant leave to amend the charging letter for good cause shown upon such conditions as are necessary to avoid prejudicing the public interest and the rights of the parties already charged.
( 4 ) Any amended charging letter shall be served upon all charged parties in the form and manner set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov 

No. III-03-007 March 4, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC OVERSIGHT PANEL TO HOLD TWO MEETINGS ON DAVIS-BESSE REACTOR

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold two meetings on Tuesday, March 11, to 

review the status and adequacy of recent activities at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station resulting

from the corrosion damage to the reactor vessel head. The plant, operated by FirstEnergy Nuclear

Operating Company at Oak Harbor, Ohio, has been shut down since February 16 of last year. 

Both meetings will be at the Camp Perry Clubhouse, 1000 Lawrence Road, Bldg. 600, on

Highway 2 west of Port Clinton. A picture identification is required to enter Camp Perry; the guards

will provide visitors with directions to the meeting site.

The first meeting will begin at 2 p.m. (EST), when the NRC oversight panel, set up to

coordinate the agency’s activities associated with the corrosion damage to the reactor vessel head, will

meet with utility officials. The meeting will focus on the status of repairs at the plant, results of recent

NRC inspections and upcoming activities. The public is invited to observe the business portion of the

meeting and will have an opportunity to make comments and ask questions of the NRC staff before the

meeting is adjourned.

The second meeting will begin at 7 p.m. (EST) to update the public on NRC’s activities related

to the reactor vessel head degradation and will provide a summary of the earlier meeting. The public

will be invited to ask questions and make comments. 

Transcripts of both meetings will be posted in several weeks on the NRC’s web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/vessel-head-degradation.html.

The NRC oversight panel, created on April 29, includes NRC management and staff from its

Region III office in Lisle, Illinois; the NRC Headquarters office in Rockville, Maryland; and the NRC

Resident Inspector Office at the Davis-Besse site.

Documents on the Davis-Besse corrosion issue, including further details on NRC’s oversight

panel activities, are posted on the NRC's web site at: http://www.nrc.gov. Select “Davis-Besse” from

the Key Topics menu.

# # #
§ 132.11 Quota priority and status. ( a ) *Determination of quota priority and status.* Quota priority and status are determined as of the time of presentation of the entry summary for consumption, or withdrawal for consumption, in proper form in accordance with § 132.1(d).
( b ) *Documentation and deposit of duties in proper form required.* Merchandise covered by an entry summary for consumption, which serves as both the entry and entry summary, or by a withdrawal for consumption, shall be regarded as entered for purposes of quota priority and shall acquire quota status if: ( 1 ) The entry summary or withdrawal for consumption is in proper form, and duties have been attached to the entry summary or withdrawal for consumption in proper form; or
( 2 ) The entry summary for consumption is in proper form, and the entry/entry summary information and a valid scheduled statement date (pursuant to § 24.25 of this chapter) have been successfully received by Customs via the Automated Broker Interface. See §§ 141.4, 141.63, 141.68, 141.69, and 141.101 of this chapter.
( c ) *Informal entries.* Mail entries or informal entries shall be regarded as presented for purposes of quota priority when all requirements have been met for the preparation of such an entry.
( d ) *Premature presentation of entry or withdrawal.* Quota status will not attach to merchandise in a quota period by reason of the presentation of an entry or withdrawal for consumption at any time prior to the opening of that period.
[T.D. 73-203, 38 FR 20230, July 30, 1973, as amended by T.D. 79-221, 44 FR 46814, Aug. 9, 1979; T.D. 89-104, 54 FR 50498, Dec. 7, 1989]
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.482 Corrected certifications of origin by exporters or producers.

Civil or administrative penalties provided for under the U.S. customs laws and regulations will not be imposed on an exporter or producer in the United States who voluntarily provides written notification pursuant to § 10.430(b) with respect to the making of an incorrect certification.
UNTED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CENTRE DE RECHERCHE

MÉDICO DENTAIRE AM INC.

Plaintiff,

v.

DIGITAL SMILE DESIGN

BY COACHMAN, DSD PLANNING 

CENTER, and DSD APPLICATIONS LLC

Defendants.

Case No. 0:20-cv-61596-RS

NOTICE OF STRIKING DOCKET ENTRY 8

Pursuant to the Clerk’s Notice (D.E. 9), notice is hereby given of striking Docket Entry 8. 

Dated: August 5, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ John C. Carey

John C. Carey (Florida Bar No. 78379)

Carey Rodriquez Milian Gonya, LLP

Miami, Florida 33131

Telephone: (305) 372-7474

Email: jcarey@careyrodriquez.com

Meredith Martin Addy (pro hac vice)

ADDYHART P.C.

10 Glenlake Parkway, Suite 130

Atlanta, Georgia 30328

Telephone: (312) 320-4200

Email: meredith@addyhart.com

Robert Hart (pro hac vice)

ADDYHART P.C.

401 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 1200-1

Chicago, Illinois 60611

Telephone: (312) 834-7701

Email: robert@addyhart.com

Case 0:20-cv-61596-RS Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/20/2020 Page 1 of 1
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ii ,,, I 

### Inthe matter of BUSH AIR CARGO, INC., Respondent. ) ) 

### ) ) ) 

### FAA DocketNo. CP- not assigned Case No. 2015/WP910102 

# _________________________) 

# \-DfV\S: J.-0

# 'le

**~** 

# YOllc>3 ANSWER Respondent, Bush Air Cargo, Inc. (hereinafter, "BAC"), by and throughthe undersigned, responds to the FAA's Complaint 

### filed inthe above captioned matter as follows: 1. Respondent Admits the allegations in paragraph II. No. 1. 2. Respondent Admits the allegations in paragraph II. No. 2. 3. Respondent Admits the allegations inparagraph II. No.3. 4. Respondent Admits the allegations inparagraph II. No. 4 to the extent BAC employed Mr. 

### Phillips during the facts at issue in this matter. 5. Respondent Admits the allegations inparagraph II. No. 5. 6. Respondent Admits the allegations in paragraph II. No. 6 to the extent that Mr. Phillips was employed by TransNorthem, LLC, prior to being hired at BAC. 7. Respondent admits the allegations inparagraph II. No.7. 8. Respondent denies the allegations inparagraph II. No. 8. 9. Respondent denies the allegations inparagraph III. No. 1a. through 1d. 10. Respondent denies the allegations in paragraph III. No.2. 11. Respondent denies the allegations inparagraph III. No. 3

FAAv. BAC, Answer Page 1 of3

### AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Evenifthe Administrator's allegations are proven true, the civil penalty demanded is not appropriate givenrepresentations made bythe Administrator's agent and financial condition of BAC measured against the severity ofthe allegations. 

### RESERVATION OF FURTHERAFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES BAC reserves the right to amend this

### Answerto assert additional affirmative defenses as may be discovered during their preparation ofthis case for trial or defenses discovered attrial. 

### GENERAL DENIAL BAC denies each and every allegation in the Complaint which is not expressly admitted inthis Answer. 

### PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, BAC prays for the following relief: A. For a fmding infavor ofBAC with an award ofcourt costs and reasonable attorney fees; or alternatively, B. For a substantially reduced civil penalty appropriate to the alleged violation. DATED at Anchorage, Alaska, this 14'h day ofMarch, 2016.
Counsel for BushAir Cargo,,



## ~,;,1' 

# # /j
. . i( 

# 11. / f 

## '",. 1



# '"v::zdh~, **~t~ /~~**  'Har(on M. Tieman, President/General



### Coun~el P.O. Box 93144 Anchorage, Ak 99509 (907) 277-7657 bushaircargo@gmail.com

FAA v. BAC, Answer Page 2 of3CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on March 14, 2016 a copy ofthe foregoing was delivered byU.S. Mail to: FAA Enforcement Division, Western Team Attention: Kyle Lomazow 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. Renton, WA 98057 Federal Aviation Administration Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilber Wright Building-Suite 2W I000 800.



### Independ.e~~~,"due, .SW 7ington,

# DA I ·- 

# •/(.d
.

**"'-.._J.f~_,:(,~/~** Barton M. Tieman

FAAv. BAC, Answer Page3 of3
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Annual Report of Summit Brokerage Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Marshall T. Leeds, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                        /s/ Marshall T. Leeds
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Marshall T. Leeds
                                        Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer
                                        March 31, 2003
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II

In the Matter of the No. 53591-2-II

Personal Restraint of

MICHAEL ALLEN HEDGES,

Petitioner.

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

LEE, A.C.J. — Michael Hedges seeks relief from personal restraint resulting from his 

2016 plea of guilty to second degree assault with sexual motivation, third degree assault, and 

residential burglary.1 Because he was convicted of a sex offense, the trial court imposed a set of 

conditions in his judgment and sentence, Appendix H, section (b), including the following:

2) The defendant shall have no contact with minor aged children without prior 

approval of the Community Corrections Officer and/or treatment provider.

3) The defendant shall hold no position of authority or trust involving minor aged 

children.

Resp. to Personal Restraint Pet., App. A, at 18.

 

1 Because the State concedes that Hedges’s judgment and sentence is facially invalid, his petition 

is not subject to RCW 10.73.090’s time-bar.

Filed

Washington State

Court of Appeals

Division Two

January 13, 2020
No. 53591-2-II

2

Hedges argues that these conditions should be stricken because they are not crime related 

in that the victim of his crimes was an adult woman. The State concedes that he is correct. We 

agree with Hedges and accept the State’s concession.

Sentencing courts may order an offender to comply with crime-related prohibitions while 

they are on community custody. RCW 9.94A.703(3)(f). Here, Hedges was convicted of offenses 

against an adult. Therefore, the challenged community custody prohibitions relating to minors are 

not crime related. Accordingly, we grant Hedges’s petition and remand to the trial court to vacate 

the above conditions from his judgment and sentence.

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the 

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040, 

it is so ordered.

LEE, A.C.J.

We concur:

WORSWICK, J.

GLASGOW, J.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsParticle kinetic simulation of high altitude hypervelocity flightIn this grant period, the focus has been on the effects of thermo-chemical nonequilibrium in low-density gases, and on interactions between such gases and solid surfaces. Such conditions apply to hypersonic flows of re-entry vehicles, and to the expansion plumes of small rockets. Due to the nonequilibrium nature of these flows, a particle approach has been adopted. The method continues to undergo refinement and application to typical flows of interest. A number of studies have been performed for flows in thermo-chemical nonequilibrium. The effects of vibrational nonequilibrium on the rate of dissociation were studied for diatomic nitrogen. It was found that a new model reproduced the nonequilibrium behavior observed experimentally.Document ID19930007349Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHeinemann, Klaus*(Eloret Corp. Sunnyvale, CA, United States)*Boyd, Iain D.*(Eloret Corp. Sunnyvale, CA, United States)*Haas, Brian L.*(Eloret Corp. Sunnyvale, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 4, 1993Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:191628NASA-CR-191628Accession Number93N16538Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC2-582Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930007349.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ TRUST TITLE COMPANY, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2015

- 5004

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:11

- cv

- 00745

- CFL, Judge Charles F. Lettow.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________

D ONALD C. H OLMES , J R

. , Donald C. Holmes and Ass ociates, P.A., Greensboro, MD, argued for plaintiff

appellant.

E RIC L AUFGRABEN , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant

- appellee. Also
represe nted by J OYCE R. B RANDA , R OBERT E. K IRSCHMAN , J R ., B RYANT G. S NEE ; T ODD P. M AIBERGER , United StatesDepartment of Housing and Urban Development, Was hington, DC.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, N EWMAN and W ALLACH , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

July 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
#### § 182.61 Rules of origin.

The regulations, implementing the rules of origin provisions of General Note 11, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), and Chapters Four and Six of the USMCA, are contained in Appendix A to this part.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-35 May 19, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC, COMPANIES TO DISCUSS LICENSE TERMINATION PLAN

FOR SAXTON NUCLEAR EXPERIMENTAL PLANT ON MAY 25

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting on Thursday, May 25,

on a request by the owners of the decommissioning Saxton Nuclear Experimental Plant to terminate

the facility’s NRC license. The plant is located in Saxton (Bedford County), Pa.

At the meeting, scheduled to begin at 7 p.m. at the Saxton Fire Hall, 8th and Norris Street in

Saxton, NRC staff will discuss the License Termination Plan for the plant and the license termination

process; present an update of its reviews and inspections of the plant; receive comments from members

of the public; and respond to questions.

Two companies, Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation and GPU Nuclear Corporation,

are the co-licensees for the 23-megawatt plant, which operated from 1962 to 1972 as a research reactor

for the nuclear power industry. Major decommissioning work began at the site in 1998, with the

removal of large components such as the reactor vessel, steam generator and pressurizer. The

remaining decommissioning and cleanup work is expected to be completed by the end of this year.

In accordance with NRC regulations, all reactor license-holders must submit an application to

the agency for termination of the operating license. On February 2nd, the plant’s owners submitted a

License Termination Plan to the NRC. That submission followed three public meetings between NRC

staff and the plant owners last year to discuss revisions to a proposed plan. If found acceptable by the

NRC staff, the plan would be approved by license amendment, subject to any conditions and/or

limitations the agency’s staff determines to be appropriate and necessary.

The License Termination Plan and an associated environmental report are available through

the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports

#