alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. III-02-016 April 3, 2002

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER APRIL 12 TO DISCUSS 

D. C. COOK NUCLEAR POWER STATION SAFETY PERFORMANCE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet on Friday, April 12, with representatives

of American Electric Power Co. in to discuss the results of the agency’s annual assessment of safety

performance at the D. C. Cook Nuclear Power Station. The two-reactor facility is located near

Bridgman, Michigan.

The meeting, which will be the open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 2

p.m. in the Hampton Inn, 5050 Red Arrow Highway, Stevensville. Before the meeting is concluded,

NRC officials will answer questions from members of the public.

The performance period to be discussed is April 1 through December 31 of last year.

A letter sent from the NRC Region III office to American Electric Power addresses plant

performance during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on

the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/cook_2001q4.pdf

Current performance information for the D. C. Cook facility is available on the NRC web site

at: (Unit 1) http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/COOK1/cook1_chart.html and (Unit 2)

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/COOK2/cook2_chart.html

# # #
### §541i. Withdrawal of lands from entry; expiration of claims

Twenty years after August 11, 1955, all lands subject to the provisions of section 541 of this title shall be withdrawn from all forms of entry under this chapter. All claims made pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall expire at that time, except for (1) claims for which patent has already been issued, and (2) claims on which application for patent has already been made and on which patent is subsequently issued: Provided, That, if the President shall so provide by Executive order, the provisions of this section shall not become effective until thirty years after August 11, 1955.

(Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 795, §10, 69 Stat. 681.)
### §1734. State suits under Federal law

#### (a) Action for royalty, interest, or civil penalty; limitations; notice of suit; award of costs and fees

(1) A State may commence a civil action under this section against any person to recover any royalty, interest, or civil penalty which the State believes is due, based upon credible evidence, with respect to any oil and gas lease on Federal lands located within the State.

(2)(A) No action may be commenced under paragraph (1) prior to 90 days after the State has given notice in writing to the Secretary of the payment required. Such 90-day limitation may be waived by the Secretary on a case-by-case basis.

(B) If, within the 90-day period specified in subparagraph (A), the Secretary issues a demand for the payment concerned, no action may be commenced under paragraph (1) with respect to such payment during a 45-day period after issuance of such demand. If, during such 45-day period, the Secretary receives payment in full, no action may be commenced under paragraph (1).

(C) If the Secretary refers the case to the Attorney General of the United States within the 45-day period referred to in subparagraph (B) or within 10 business days after the expiration of such 45-day period, no action may be commenced under paragraph (1) if the Attorney General, within 45 days after the date of such referral, commences, and thereafter diligently prosecutes, a civil action in a court of the United States with respect to the payment concerned.

(3) The State shall notify the Secretary and the Attorney General of the United States of any suit filed by the State under this section.

(4) A court in issuing any final order in any action brought under paragraph (1) may award costs of litigation including reasonable attorney and expert witness fees, to any party in such action if the court determines such an award is appropriate.

#### (b) Venue; jurisdiction of district court

An action brought under subsection (a) of this section may be brought only in a United States district court for the judicial district in which the lease site or the leasing activity complained of is located. Such district court shall have jurisdiction, without regard to the amount in controversy or the citizenship of the parties, to require compliance or order payment in any such action.

#### (c) Recovery of civil penalty by State; deposit of rent, royalty, or interest recovery in Treasury of the United States

(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any civil penalty recovered by a State under subsection (a) shall be retained by the State and may be expended in such manner and for such purposes as the State deems appropriate.

(2) Any rent, royalty, or interest recovered by a State under subsection (a) shall be deposited in the Treasury of the United States in the same manner, and subject to the same requirements, as are applicable in the case of any rent, royalty, or interest collected by an officer or employee of the United States, except that such amounts shall be deposited in the Treasury not later than 10 days after receipt by the State.

(Pub. L. 97–451, title II, §204, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2458.)
### §955. State laws

(a) No State law in effect on December 30, 1969 or which may become effective thereafter shall be superseded by any provision of this chapter or order issued or any mandatory health or safety standard, except insofar as such State law is in conflict with this chapter or with any order issued or any mandatory health or safety standard.

(b) The provisions of any State law or regulation in effect upon the operative date of this chapter, or which may become effective thereafter, which provide for more stringent health and safety standards applicable to coal or other mines than do the provisions of this chapter or any order issued or any mandatory health or safety standard shall not thereby be construed or held to be in conflict with this chapter. The provisions of any State law or regulation in effect on December 30, 1969, or which may become effective thereafter, which provide for health and safety standards applicable to coal or other mines for which no provision is contained in this chapter or in any order issued or any mandatory health or safety standard, shall not be held to be in conflict with this chapter.

(Pub. L. 91–173, title V, §506, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 803; Pub. L. 95–164, title III, §303(e), Nov. 9, 1977, 91 Stat. 1321.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 91–173, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 742, known as the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 801 of this title and Tables.

For the operative date of this chapter, referred to in subsec. (b), see section 509 of Pub. L. 91–173, set out as an Effective Date note under section 801 of this title.

#### Amendments

1977—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–164 inserted reference to mines other than coal mines.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1977 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–164 effective 120 days after Nov. 9, 1977, except as otherwise provided, see section 307 of Pub. L. 95–164, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT GREGOR

Y GOODS, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. B EHR OZ HAM KAR , De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 15-15796 D.C . No. 2:12-c v-1111-M C E-EFB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia M orrison C . Engla

nd, Jr., C hie f Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 24, 2016 * * B e fore : LEAVY, FER NANDEZ, a

nd R AW LINSON, C irc uit Judge s. Gre gory Goods, a C a lifornia

sta te prisone r, a

ppe a ls pro se from the distric t c ourt’ s sum

m ary judgm e nt in his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging de libe rate indiffe re nc e to his se rious m e dic a l ne e ds a nd re ta lia tion for filing griev anc e s. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo a nd a ffirm . S

e e 

# FIL ED MAR 02 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Toguc hi v . C hung , 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th C ir. 2004). The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt on Goods’ s de libe rate indiffe re nc e c la im

be c a use Goods fa ile d to ra ise a ge nuine disputeof m ate ria l fa c t a s to whe the r de fe nda

nt wa s de libe rate ly

indiffe re nt to his kne e injury . Se e id. at 1057-60 (a

prison offic ia l is de libe rate ly indiffe re nt only if he or she knows of a

nd disre ga rds a n e xc e ssive risk to a

n inm ate ’ s he a lth; m e dic a l m a lpra c tic e , ne glige nc e , or a diffe re nc e of opinion c o nc e rning thec ourse of tre at m e nt doe s not a

m o unt to de libe ra t e indiffe re nc e ); Halle tt v . Morgan , 296 F.3d 732, 745-46 (9th C ir. 2002) (whe re the prisone r is a lle ging tha t de la y of m e dic a l tre atm e n t e vinc e s de libe rate indiffe re nc e , the prisone r m ust show tha

t the de l ay

le d to furthe r injury ); se ealso J e tt v . Pe nne r , 439 F.3d 1091, 1096 (9th C ir. 2006) (if theha rm is a n isola te d e xc e ption to the

prisone r’ s ove ra ll tre atm e nt, it “ ‘ ordina rily m ilita te s a ga i nst a finding of de libe ra te indiffe re nc e ’ ” (c ita tion omitte d)). W e do not c onside r issue s whic h a re not supporte d by

argum e nt. Se e Ac osta-Hue rta v . Este lle , 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th C ir. 1993). AFFIRM E D.

1 5 - 1 5 7 9 6 2
PUBLIC LAW 106–324—OCT. 19, 2000 114 STAT. 1291

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3817:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106–738 (Comm. on Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

July 25, considered and passed House.

Oct. 5, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–324

106th Congress

An Act

To dedicate the Big South Trail in the Comanche Peak Wilderness Area of Roosevelt

National Forest in Colorado to the legacy of Jaryd Atadero.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDING.

Congress finds that Jaryd Atadero, a 3-year old boy from

Littleton, Colorado, was last seen the morning of October 2, 1999,

1 and one-half miles from the trailhead of the Big South Trail

in the Comanche Peak Wilderness Area of Roosevelt National

Forest.

SEC. 2. DEDICATION.

Congress dedicates the Big South Trail in the Comanche Peak

Wilderness Area of Roosevelt National Forest to Jaryd Atadero

and his legacy of promoting safe outdoor recreation for children.

SEC. 3. SIGN.

The Secretary of Agriculture shall recognize the loss of Jaryd

Atadero and the need for increased awareness of child safety in

outdoor recreation settings by posting an interpretive sign at the

Big South Trail trailhead that—

(1) describes consideration for safe outdoor recreation with

children;

(2) refers to the tragic loss of Jaryd Atadero to underscore

the need for such safety considerations;

(3) refers to the dedication by Congress of this trail and

safety message to the legacy of Jaryd Atadero; and

(4) for not less than 1 year, includes a copy of this Act

and an image of Jaryd Atadero.

Approved October 19, 2000.

Oct. 19, 2000

[H.R. 3817]
EXHIBIT

10.92




 




 




STRAIGHT NOTE




 




 




	

  $600,000


  	

   


  	

  South El Monte,

  California


  	

   


  	

  July 1, 2002


  





 




For value received, Lee Pharmaceuticals promises to

pay The Monticello Companies, Inc. or order, at South El Monte, California the

sum of SIX HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS, with interest adjusted to the date funds

are received, on unpaid principal at the rate of ten (10) per cent per

annum.  Interest only will be payable on

the 20th of each month commencing on August 20, 2002.  Interest shall be calculated on the basis of the unpaid principal

balance daily, based on a 365-day year, actual day month and payable

monthly.  Principal and interest shall

be payable in lawful money of the United States.  If action were instituted on this note, I promise to pay such sum

as the Court may fix as attorney’s fees. 

The due date of this note is October 1, 2004 or later.




 




After two years, from July 1, 2002, either party can

give 90 days written notice to pay off or ask for the funds back.




 




1)      General Corporate Obligation.




 




2)      Any brand(s) purchased with the loan proceeds will provide The

Monticello Companies, Inc. a security interest in the brand(s).




 




3)      Personal Guarantee of Ronald G. Lee.




 




 




	

  JULY 1, 2002


  	

   


  	

  RONALD G. LEE


  
	

  Date


  	

   


  	

  Lee Pharmaceuticals - Ronald G. Lee


  
	

   


  	

   


  
	

   


  	

   


  
	

  JULY 1, 2002


  	

   


  	

  MICHAEL L. AGRESTI


  
	

  Date


  	

   


  	

  Lee Pharmaceuticals - Michael L. Agresti
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: For additional information, see related documents published at 47 FR 57369, Dec. 23, 1982; 48 FR 17101, Apr. 21, 1983; and 48 FR 29096, June 24, 1983.

§ 4.12 How may a State simplify, consolidate, or substitute federally required State plans? ( a ) As used in this section: ( 1 ) *Simplify* means that a State may develop its own format, choose its own submission date, and select the planning period for a State plan.
( 2 ) *Consolidate* means that a State may meet statutory and regulatory requirements by combining two or more plans into one document and that the State can select the format, submission date, and planning period for the consolidated plan.
( 3 ) *Substitute* means that a State may use a plan or other document that it has developed for its own purposes to meet Federal requirements.
( b ) If not inconsistent with law, a State may decide to try to simplify, consolidate, or substitute federally required state plans without prior approval by the Administrator.
( c ) The Administrator reviews each state plan that a State has simplified, consolidated, or substituted and accepts the plan only if its contents meet Federal requirements.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24




                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         Each person whose signature appears below authorizes Michael Williams,
Chairman of the Board, or Paul Skubic, President, to execute in the name of each
such person who is then an officer or director of the registrant, and to file,
the 1999 Harris Preferred Capital Corporation Annual Report to the Securities
and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



         /s/                                   /s/
         ----------------------------          -------------------------------
         David Blockowicz                      Paul R. Skubic
         Director                              Director



         /s/                                   /s/
         ----------------------------          -------------------------------
         Frank M. Novosel                      Delbert Wacker
         Director                              Director



         /s/                                   /s/
         ----------------------------          -------------------------------
         Thomas R. Sizer                       Michael D. Williams
         Director                              Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE REGISTRANT'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      10,408,434
<SECURITIES>                                 4,797,394
<RECEIVABLES>                                  324,461
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,514
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,372,270
<PP&E>                                       6,769,812
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,985,969
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,634,832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,439,940
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 22,962,211
<COMMON>                                        90,549
<OTHER-SE>                                  73,687,928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,634,832
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               687,201
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,781,453
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,094,252)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,094,252)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,094,252)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.83)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1537 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1537

To amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to clarify that restrictions on 
    baiting of migratory game birds do not prohibit the taking of a 
  migratory game bird on or over manipulated re-growth of a harvested 
                               rice crop.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 2003

   Mr. John introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to clarify that restrictions on 
    baiting of migratory game birds do not prohibit the taking of a 
  migratory game bird on or over manipulated re-growth of a harvested 
                               rice crop.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TAKING OF A MIGRATORY GAME BIRD ON OR OVER MANIPULATED RE-
              GROWTH OF A RICE CROP.

    (a) In General.--Section 3(b) of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 
U.S.C. 704(b)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(1)'' and inserting ``(A)'';
            (2) by striking ``(2)'' and inserting ``(B)'';
            (3) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``(b)''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) Paragraph (1) does not prohibit--
            ``(A) taking of a migratory game bird on or over 
        manipulated re-growth of a harvested rice crop; or
            ``(B) causing, inducing, or allowing a person to take or 
        attempt to take a migratory game bird on or over manipulated 
        re-growth of a harvested rice crop.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 6(c) of the Migratory Bird 
Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 707(c)) is amended by striking ``section 
3(b)(2)'' and inserting ``section 3(b)(1)(B)''.
                                 <all>
```
### §60a–2a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 60a–2a was editorially reclassified as section 4532 of this title.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0062 - Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2002

Accession Number: ML030640004

Date Released: Tuesday, April 29, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML030590409 - SECY-03-0062 - Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2002 (11 page(s), 4/21/2003)
    - ML030840667 - SECY-03-0062-Attachment 1-ROP Program Area Assessments (10 page(s), 4/21/2003)
    - ML030620002 - SECY-03-0062-Attachment 2-Status of Previous Issues (8 page(s), 4/21/2003)
    - ML030620003 - SECY-03-0062-Attachment 3-ROP Performance Metrics (54 page(s), 4/21/2003)
    - ML030840693 - SECY-03-0062-Attachment 4-ROP Communication Activities (5 page(s), 4/21/2003)
    - ML030620004 - SECY-03-0062-Attachment 5-Internal Stakeholder Survey Results (7 page(s), 4/21/2003)
    - ML030630007 - SECY-03-0062-Attachment 6-Cross Cutting Issue Assessment (4 page(s), 4/21/2003)
    - ML030630816 - SECY-03-0062-Attachment 7-ROP Resource Analysis (11 page(s), 4/21/2003)
    - ML030630830 - SECY-03-0062-Attachment 8-Resident Inspector Demographics (17 page(s), 4/21/2003)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-009 January 20, 2004

 NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

 TO MEET FEBRUARY 5 - 7 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards will hold a

meeting from February 5 to 7 in Rockville, Md. The committee’s discussions will include, among

other items, the Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor (ESBWR) advanced reactor design, and

the root-cause investigation into reactor vessel bottom-mounted penetration leakage at the South Texas

Project nuclear power plant.

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at

11545 Rockville Pike. It will begin at 8:30 a.m. each day. The meeting will be open to the public,

apart from a portion of the ESBWR discussion, which could be closed to the public to discuss

proprietary information.

A complete agenda will be available on the NRC’s Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2004/ . For additional information, please

contact Dr. Sher Bahadur, at 301-415-7362, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m.

###