alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 206.66 Limited disclosure of certain confidential business information under administrative protective order.

In an investigation under section 422(b) of the Trade Act, the Secretary shall make confidential business information available to authorized applicants, subject to the provisions of § 206.17.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsASRM case insulation design and developmentThis paper describes the achievements made on the Advanced Solid Rocket Motor (ASRM) case insulation design and development program. The ASRM case insulation system described herein protects the metal case and joints from direct radiation and hot gas impingement. Critical failure of solid rocket systems is often traceable to failure of the insulation design. The wide ranging accomplishments included the development of a nonasbestos insulation material for ASRM that replaced the existing Redesigned Solid Rocket Motor (RSRM) asbestos-filled nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) along with a performance gain of 300 pounds, and improved reliability of all the insulation joint designs, i.e., segmented case joint, case-to-nozzle and case-to-igniter joint. The insulation process development program included the internal stripwinding process. This process advancement allowed Aerojet to match to exceed the capability of other propulsion companies.Document ID19930007416Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsBell, Matthew S.*(Aerojet-General Corp. Sacramento, CA, United States)*Tam, William F. S.*(Aerojet-General Corp. Sacramento, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 30, 1992Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-191947NAS 1.26:191947Meeting InformationMeeting: Society for the Advancement of Materials and Process EngineeringLocation: Anaheim, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: May 10, 1993End Date: May 13, 1993Accession Number93N16605Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-37800Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930007416.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
II 

Calendar No. 66

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 145

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

APRIL 9, 2003

Reported by Mr. INHOFE, without amendment 

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 290 Broadway 

in New York, New York, as the ‘‘Ted Weiss Federal 

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The Federal building located at 290 Broadway in 

5 New York, New York, shall be known and designated as 

6 the ‘‘Ted Weiss Federal Building’’. 
2

•HR 145 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be 

5 a reference to the ‘‘Ted Weiss Federal Building’’. 

Calendar No. 66

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 145

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 290 

Broadway in New York, New York, as the ‘‘Ted Weiss Federal Building’’. 

APRIL 9, 2003

Reported without amendment
### §50. Grants to States or corporations not to include mineral lands

No act passed at the first session of the Thirty-eighth Congress, granting lands to States or corporations to aid in the construction of roads or for other purposes, or to extend the time of grants made prior to the 30th day of January 1865 shall be so construed as to embrace mineral lands, which in all cases are reserved exclusively to the United States, unless otherwise specially provided in the act or acts making the grant.

(R.S. §2346.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The first session of the Thirty-eighth Congress, referred to in text, was begun Dec. 7, 1863, and ended July 4, 1864, 13 Stat. 1 to 417, contain legislation passed at such session.

#### Codification

R.S. §2346 derived from Res. Jan. 30, 1865, No. 10, 13 Stat. 567.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-03-077 December 22, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NEW NRC RESIDENT INSPECTOR ASSIGNED 

TO OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT

Jeffrey Herrera has been assigned as the new Nuclear Regulatory Commission resident

inspector at the Oyster Creek nuclear power plant. He joins NRC Resident Inspector Robert

Summers at the plant, located in Forked River, N.J. Herrera replaces Steven Dennis, who

accepted a position at NRC headquarters in Rockville, Md. 

Mr. Herrera joined the NRC in May 2001 as an intern in the Region I Division of Reactor

Projects in King of Prussia, Pa. After graduating the intern program, he worked as a project

engineer in Region I. Prior to joining the agency he worked as a research assistant for Surface

Chemists of Florida and as a laboratory technician for Florida Power and Light. 

Mr. Herrera is a graduate of Florida International University where he earned a bachelor’s 

degree in chemical engineering. His hobbies include hiking and photography. He recently took

up the guitar.

The Oyster Creek resident inspectors can be reached at 609/693-0702.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve

as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work

projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. 

###
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1571 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1571

  To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide that the term of 
office of the Director of the Census shall be 5 years; to provide that 
    the Director of the Census report directly to the Secretary of 
                   Commerce, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 2003

 Mrs. Maloney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide that the term of 
office of the Director of the Census shall be 5 years; to provide that 
    the Director of the Census report directly to the Secretary of 
                   Commerce, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIRECTOR OF THE CENSUS.

    (a) In General.--Section 21 of title 13, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 21. Director of the Census; duties; term
    ``(a) The Bureau shall be headed by a Director of the Census, 
appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the 
Senate. The Director shall perform such duties as may be imposed upon 
him by law, regulations, or orders of the Secretary, and shall report 
directly to the Secretary.
    ``(b) The term of office of the Director shall be 5 years, and 
shall begin on January 1, 2002, and every fifth year thereafter. Any 
individual appointed to fill a vacancy in such position, occurring 
before the expiration of the term for which his predecessor was 
appointed, shall be appointed for the remainder of that term. The 
Director may serve after the end of his term until reappointed or until 
a successor has been appointed, but in no event longer than 180 
days.''.
    (b) Transition Provision.--The individual serving as the Director 
of the Census on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act 
may continue to serve in that position until such individual or a 
successor has been appointed in accordance with the amendment made by 
section 1(a), but in no event longer than 180 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 1 of 
title 13, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating 
to section 21 and inserting the following:

``21. Director of the Census; duties; term.''.
                                 <all>
```
### §§230 to 233. Repealed. June 22, 1948, ch. 605, §3, 62 Stat. 576

Section 230, act Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 249, §1, 42 Stat. 1448, authorized permits and leases for certain United States citizens and corporations in Oklahoma.

Section 231, act Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 249, §2, 42 Stat. 1448, required applications for permits and leases to be made not later than sixty days after Mar. 4, 1923.

Section 232, act Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 249, §3, 42 Stat. 1448, limited amount of land any one person or corporation could be granted.

Section 233, act Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 249, §4, 42 Stat. 1448, provided for payment of royalties to United States.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

Act June 22, 1948, ch. 605, §3, 62 Stat. 576, provided that the repeal of these sections is subject to existing valid rights.
#### Irving Gerber, Respondent, v. Jarold Shops, Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ. [Order denied motion to make complaint more definite and certain.]
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.888 Issuance of negative origin determinations. If, as a result of an origin verification initiated under this subpart, CBP determines that a claim for preferential tariff treatment made under § 10.863 of this subpart should be denied, it will issue a determination in writing or via an authorized electronic data interchange system to the importer that sets forth the following: ( a ) A description of the good that was the subject of the verification together with the identifying numbers and dates of the export and import documents pertaining to the good;
( b ) A statement setting forth the findings of fact made in connection with the verification and upon which the determination is based; and
( c ) With specific reference to the rules applicable to originating goods as set forth in General Note 31, HTSUS, and in §§ 10.863 through 10.886 of this subpart, the legal basis for the determination.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Lunsford, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of RealNetworks, Inc.; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 29, 2011



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael Lunsford                  
|Michael Lunsford                      
|Title: Interim Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:20-cv-23276-GAYLES/OTAZO-REYES

UNISOURCE DISCOVERY, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

v.

UNISOURCE DISCOVERY, LLC 

and STEVEN A. CERASALE,

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs.

______________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes’ 

Report and Recommendation (the “Report”), [ECF No. 386], regarding Defendant/CounterPlaintiffs’, Unisource Discovery, LLC and Steven A. Cerasale (collectively, “Defendants”),

Memorandum in Support of Bill of Costs, (the “Motion for Costs”), [ECF No. 371]. On February

15, 2023, the Court referred the Motion for Costs to Judge Otazo-Reyes, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B), for a report and recommendation. [ECF No. 375]. On May 25, 2023, Judge OtazoReyes issued her Report recommending that the Motion for Costs be granted in part. [ECF No. 

386]. No objections were filed be either party.

A district court may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Those portions of the report and recommendation to which 

objections are made are accorded de novo review, if those objections “pinpoint the specific findings 

that the party disagrees with.” United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009); see 

also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Any portions of the report and recommendation to which no specific 

Case 1:20-cv-23276-DPG Document 388 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

objections are made are reviewed only for clear error. Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. WestPoint 

Underwriters, L.L.C., 199 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2001); accord Macort v. Prem, Inc., 

208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006).

Having reviewed the Report for clear error, the Court agrees with Judge Otazo-Reyes’

well-reasoned analysis and conclusion that the Motion should be granted in part.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes’ Report and Recommendation, [ECF No. 

386], is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED and incorporated into this Order by 

reference.

2. Defendants’ Motion for Costs, [ECF No. 371], is GRANTED in part.

3. Defendants are hereby awarded $2,643.60 in taxable costs as the prevailing party 

in this action.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 12th day of June, 2023.

________________________________

DARRIN P. GAYLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-23276-DPG Document 388 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2023 Page 2 of 2
### §1816. Construction contracts

#### (a) Liquidated damages

The Architect of the Capitol may not enter into or administer any construction contract with a value greater than $50,000 unless the contract includes a provision requiring the payment of liquidated damages in the amount determined under subsection (b) in the event that completion of the project is delayed because of the contractor.

#### (b) Amount of payment

The amount of payment required under a liquidated damages provision described in subsection (a) shall be equal to the product of—

(1) the daily liquidated damage payment rate; and

(2) the number of days by which the completion of the project is delayed.

#### (c) Daily liquidated damage payment rate

#### (1) In general

In subsection (b), the "daily liquidated damage payment rate" means—

(A) $140, in the case of a contract with a value greater than $50,000 and less than $100,000;

(B) $200, in the case of a contract with a value equal to or greater than $100,000 and equal to or less than $500,000; and

(C) the sum of $200 plus $50 for each $100,000 increment by which the value of the contract exceeds $500,000, in the case of a contract with a value greater than $500,000.

#### (2) Adjustment in rate permitted

Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the daily liquidated damage payment rate may be adjusted by the contracting officer involved to a rate greater or lesser than the rate described in such paragraph if the contracting officer makes a written determination that the rate described does not accurately reflect the anticipated damages which will be suffered by the United States as a result of the delay in the completion of the contract.

#### (d) Effective date

This section shall apply with respect to contracts entered into during fiscal year 2002 or any succeeding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 107–68, title I, §130, Nov. 12, 2001, 115 Stat. 580.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 166j of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.
§ 148.1 Registration of effects to be taken abroad. ( a ) *Persons who may use procedure.* Any person, except a nonresident seaman, airman, or person engaged in similar employment, who intends to take effects of foreign origin abroad may register such articles before departure from the United States in order to facilitate their identification on return to the United States. Only articles of foreign origin having serial numbers or other distinctive, permanently affixed unique markings can be registered.
( b ) *Procedures for registration.* Applicants for registration of articles of foreign origin shall present the articles, together with a completed, but unsigned, Customs Form 4457, or its electronic equivalent, which may be obtained in advance of departure, to a Customs officer. After the Customs officer has examined the articles and verified their description, he shall have the applicant sign the form. The Customs officer shall then sign the form and return it to the applicant for presentation on return of the articles. Customs form 4455, or its electronic equivalent, may be required in any case in which Customs form 4457, or its electronic equivalent, will not adequately serve the purpose of registration.
( c ) *Presentation on return and reuse.* The form shall be presented to the Customs officer when the registered articles are returned to the United States. The form shall be valid for reuse as long as the document is legible to identify the registered articles.
[T.D. 82-102, 47 FR 24119, June 3, 1982, as amended by T.D. 91-35, 56 FR 19260, Apr. 26, 1991; CBP Dec. No. 15-14, 80 FR 61291, Oct. 13, 2015]
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

38 39 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 07/20 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 20 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21.1



                                 SUBSIDIARIES

1.    EXE Technologies (UK) plc in the United Kingdom.
2.    EXE Technologies (S.E.A.) Pte. Ltd. in Singapore.
3.    EXE Technologies (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. in Malaysia.
4.    EXE Technologies (China) Limited in Hong Kong.
5.    EXE Technologies - Middle East (FZE) in Dubai.
6.    EXE Technologies K.K. in Japan.
7.    EXE Technologies Korea Ltd. in Korea.
8.    EXE Technologies (European Holdings) B.V. in the Netherlands.
      This subsidiary is the parent of:
               EXE Technologies (Benelux) B.V. in the Netherlands.
               EXE Technologies (France) S.A.S. in France.
               EXE Technologies (Germany) GmbH.
Order entered October 12, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01571-CV

JOANN SEMPLE AND CAROL MATTHEWS, Appellants

V.

FRED VINCENT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-11180

ORDER

We GRANT appellants’ October 5, 2016 motion to extend time to filed their brief and 

ORDER the brief received by the Court on September 30, 2016 filed as of the date of this order. 

We STRIKE appellants’ previous briefs, filed June 2, 2016 and September 26, 2016. Appellee’s 

brief is due November 14, 2016.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
### §§190b, 190c. Repealed. S. Res. 274, §2(a), Nov. 14, 1979

Section 190b, acts Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title I, §134(a), (c), 60 Stat. 831, 832; Oct. 26, 1970, Pub. L. 91–510, title I, §117(a), 84 Stat. 1155; Dec. 16, 1970, Pub. L. 91–552, §1(6), 84 Stat. 1440; July 12, 1974, Pub. L. 93–344, title IX, §903(a), 88 Stat. 331; S. Res. 4, §402(c), Feb. 4, 1977, related to authority of Senate standing committees and subcommittees. See Standing Rules of the Senate.

Section 190c, acts Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title I, §135, 60 Stat. 832; Oct. 26, 1970, Pub. L. 91–510, title I, §125(a)(2), 84 Stat. 1159, related to Senate conference reports. See Standing Rules of the Senate.
§ 133.6 Change in name of owner of recorded trademark. If there is a change in the name of the owner of a recorded trademark, but no change in ownership, written notice thereof shall be given to the IPR & Restricted Merchandise Branch, CBP Headquarters, accompanied by: ( a ) A status copy of the certificate of registration certified by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office showing title to be presently in the name as changed; and
( b ) A fee of $80, which covers all trademarks included in the application which have been previously recorded with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. A check or money order shall be made payable to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
[T.D. 72-266, 37 FR 20678, Oct. 3, 1972, as amended by T.D. 75-160, 40 FR 28791, July 9, 1975; T.D. 91-77, 56 FR 46115, Sept. 10, 1991]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information 
extracted from the Registrant's unaudited interim financial
statements for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to those financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000895993
<NAME> RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST II
       
<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                    178,447
<SECURITIES>                           16,116,582<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          178,447
<PP&E>                                     50,000<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         16,367,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     276,896
<BONDS>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                             16,090,153<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           16,367,049
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          531,265
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          296,991
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           234,274
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       234,274
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              234,274
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              994.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                              994.47

<FN>
<F1>Investments in power project partnerships.
<F2>Equipment in storage.
<F3>Represents Investor Shares of beneficial interest in
Trust with capital accounts of $16,130,495 less managing
shareholder's accumulated deficit of $40,342.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Morris R. Jacobson, Respondent, v. Hildur Jacobson, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.