alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

April 16, 2008 

James Goldstene, Executive Officer 

California Air Resources Board 

100 1 I Street 

Sacramento, CA 958 12 

RE: Adequacy Status of Coachella Valley 8-hour Ozone Early Progress Plan Motor 

Vehicle Emissions Budgets 

Dear Mr. Goldstene: 

We have found adequate for transportation conformity purposes the motor vehicle 

emissions budgets (MVEBs) in the Coachella Valley 8-hour Ozone Early Progress Plan 

(February 2008). As a result of our adequacy findings, the Southern California 

Association of Governments and the U.S. Department of Transportation must use these 

budgets in future conformity analyses once the finding becomes effective. 

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) submitted the draft Coachella 

Valley 8-hour Ozone Early Progress Plan to EPA for parallel processing on February 6, 

2008 as a revision to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The plan identifies 

regional MVEBs for the nonattinment area for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and 

nitrogen oxides (NOx) for the year 201 2. We announced receipt of the plan on EPA's 

website on February 14, 2008, and requested public comment by March 17, 2008. We did 

not receive any comments on the budgets and plan during that comment period. CARB 

formally adopted the plan without amendment on February 28,2008, and submitted the 

final version to EPA on March 24, 2008. 

This letter transmits our decision that the motor vehicle emissions budgets 

contained in the Coachella Valley 8-hour Ozone Early Progress Plan are adequate for 

transportation conformity decisions. The plan identifies regional motor vehicle emission 

budgets in the table below: 

I The plan uses a comparable State term, reactive organic gases (ROC). 1 

Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets I Budget Year 

We have detailed our adequacy findings in the enclosure. Consistent with the 

2004 final amendments to the Transportation Conformity Rule (69 FR 4004) these 8-hour 

VOC1 (tons per day) NOx (tons per day) 
We have detailed our adequacy findings in the enclosure. Consistent with the 

2004 final amendments to the Transportation Conformity Rule (69 FR 4004) these 8-hour 

motor vehicle emissions budgets replace the existing 1-hour'ozone motor vehicle 

emission budgets from the 2004 Attainment Plan. A copy of this letter and its enclosures 

will soon be posted on the Internet at 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/trmsconadequacy.htm. We will also announce 

the adequacy findings in the Federal Register. The findings will become effective 15 days 

after the Federal Register announcement. 

If you have any questions regarding these adequacy findings, please contact Matt 

Haber at (415) 947-4154 or Rebecca Rosen at (415) 947-4152. 

Deborah ~ordh 

Director, Air Division 

Enclosure 

cc: Hasan Ikhrata, SCAG 

Jonathan Nadler, SCAG 

Jean Mazur, FHWA
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary license have been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984, as amended by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR 515. License no.
Name/address
Date reissued003966F
Amerasa Rapid Transit USA Inc., 2490-M Arnold Industrial Way, Concord, CA 94520
September 21, 2004.009867N
ZHarro Schumacher dba Schumacher Cargo Lines, 15501 Texaco Avenue, Paramount, CA 90723
September 23, 2004.( print page 61673)004395F
Superior Link International Inc., 380 S. Lemon Avenue, Suite B1-G, Walnut, CA 91789
September 27, 2004.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 04-23487 Filed 10-19-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6081
ARTHUR LEE BRANCH, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-94-542-5-BO) Submitted: July 31, 1996 Decided: August 20, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arthur Lee Branch, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Branch v. North Carolina , No. CA-94-542-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the annual report of Mexoro Minerals Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Robert Knight Robert Knight, CEO  June 12, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999, THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, CASH FLOWS AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND FOOTNOTES THERETO AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
THERETO.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              20,600
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      814,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                       761,300
<INVENTORY>                                        549,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   725,100
<PP&E>                                             669,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                     445,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     967,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,080,700
<BONDS>                                             11,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            17,900
<OTHER-SE>                                      (2,134,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    (2,116,100)
<SALES>                                          3,552,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,552,500
<CGS>                                            2,571,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,571,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 123,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,937,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,937,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,937,100)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.31)


</TABLE>
### §1220. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 102–166, title III, §304, formerly §321, Nov. 21, 1991, 105 Stat. 1097; renumbered §304 and amended Pub. L. 104–1, title V, §504(a)(3), (4), Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 41, which provided for application of provisions of section 1202 to previously exempt State employees, enforcement by administrative action, judicial review, and attorney fees, was transferred to section 2000e–16c of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
#### Helene M. Van Nostrand, Respondent, v. Hermann M. Hofer, Appellant.

Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 1035.]
### (49111-13-P1 DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Admioistration

airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes) 14CFR Part 39 

### :>011- 

## 0030 (Docket No. FAA-1Of&... •• ••• ;Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-183-AD) 

### RlN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 andA310Series Airplanes, and Mode A300 84-600. B4-600R. and F4-600R Series Airplanes. and Model C4-605R Variant 

# fir AGENCY: Federal Aviatlon Administration (FAA). DOT. ACTION: Notice ofproposed 

### rulemaJcing (NPRM). SUMMARY: We propose to adopt anew airworthiness directive (AD) for lhe producl

# ---



# --

--

product. The MeAl describes. the unsafe condition as: mandatory continuing airworthiness infonnation (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority ofanother country to identify and correct anunsafe condition on an aviation



## • • • 

# • • • • The actions contained inthese revised documents, which inlroduce more restrictive maintenance requirements andlOTairworthiness limitations, have been identified as mandatory aClions for continued airworthiness .•••. The airworthiness limitations applicable to the Damage Tolerant Airworthiness Limitation Items (DT ALl) arc currently listed in Airbus ALl Documents, which are referenced in the A300. A31 O. and AJOO-600 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) Part 2. Airbus has recently revised the ALl Documents. which have been approved bythe European Aviation SafelYAgency (EASA) . listed above that would supersede three exisling ADs. This proposed AD results from

FAA Form 1360·14.1 (6-89) OfFICIAL FILEcopy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GLOBAL
INDUSTRIES, LTD.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          20,859
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  115,417
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               185,228
<PP&E>                                         530,002
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 779,650
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,416
<BONDS>                                        266,280
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           936
<OTHER-SE>                                     387,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   779,650
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               226,081
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  200,565
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,839
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,551)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,355)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,196)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          783
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,979)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)


</TABLE>
§ 191.45 Returned retail merchandise. ( a ) *Special rule for substitution.* Section 313(c)(1)(C)(ii) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(c)(1)(C)(ii)), provides for drawback upon the exportation or destruction under CBP supervision of imported merchandise which has been entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, duty-paid and ultimately sold at retail by the importer, or the person who received the merchandise from the importer, and for any reason returned to and accepted by the importer, or the person who received the merchandise from the importer.
( b ) *Eligibility requirements.* ( 1 ) Drawback is allowable, subject to compliance with all requirements set forth in this subpart; and
( 2 ) The claimant must also show by evidence satisfactory to CBP that drawback may be claimed by— ( i ) Designating an entry of merchandise that was imported within 1 year before the date of exportation or destruction of the merchandise described in paragraph (a) of this section under CBP supervision.
( ii ) Certifying that the same 8-digit HTSUS subheading number and specific product identifier (such as part number, SKU, or product code) apply to both the merchandise designated for drawback (in the import documentation) and the returned merchandise.
( c ) *Allowable refund.* The amount of drawback allowable will not exceed 99 percent of the amount of duties, taxes, and fees paid with respect to the imported merchandise.
( d ) *Denial of claims.* No drawback will be refunded if CBP is not satisfied that the claimant has provided, upon request, the documentation necessary to support the certification required in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section.
[USCBP-2018-0029, 83 FR 65065, Dec. 18, 2018]
#### Aron Altman, Appellant, v. Gesine Beck and Others, Defendants. Benjamin Trektman, Respondent.

The-parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and’motion denied, with ten dollars costs. There is no proof that the judgment assigned to respondent is a lien upon the mortgaged premises, as there is no evidence of the estate or interest of Holmes in the premises. The indefinite allegation in the complaint is insufficient. This defect is fatal. The reversal is without prejudice to a renewal of the application upon further proof. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Certification

I, William J. Dore', Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of June30, 2004 of Global Industries, Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made know to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

August 6, 2004

                                                                                                                         /S/ WILLIAM J. DORE'

                                                                                                                          William J. Dore'

                                                                                                                          Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of Julius Goldberg, Respondent, against Ferdinand Q. Morton et al., Constituting the Municipal Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag^ JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 822.^
Amendment No. 3 to Lease Agreement with J Wiley



  
 EXHIBIT 10.12 
  
 AMENDMENT #3 TO LEASE AGREEMENT WITH JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC. 







  
 AMENDMENT #3 
 TO LEASE DATED NOVEMBER 4, 1998, 
 BY AND BETWEEN CROSSPOINT SEVEN, LLC, 
 AS LANDLORD, AND WILEY PUBLISHING, INC. 
 (FORMERLY KNOWN AS HUNGRY MINDS, INC. AND PRIOR TO THAT, IDG
BOOKS 
 WORLDWIDE, INC), AS TENANT 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT TO LEASE, entered into and made as of the 31 day of
October, 2002, by and between Crosspoint Seven, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company, as Landlord (“Landlord”), and Wiley Publishing, Inc. (formerly known as Hungry Minds, Inc. and prior to that, IDG Books Worldwide, Inc.), a Delaware
corporation, as Tenant (“Original Tenant”) and John Wiley & Sons, Inc., a New York corporation (“Assuming Tenant”). 
  
 WITNESSETH : 
  
 WHEREAS, Landlord and Original Tenant have heretofore entered
into a certain lease, dated November 4, 1998, that certain Amendment #1 to Lease dated November 15, 1999, and that certain Amendment #2 to Lease dated February 7, 2001 (collectively, the “Lease”), of certain space at 10475 Crosspoint
Boulevard, Indianapolis, Indiana (the “Premises”), upon terms and conditions described in said Lease; and 
  
 WHEREAS, Original Tenant and Assuming Tenant desire to amend the Lease as hereinafter provided; 
  
 WHEREAS, Landlord is willing to amend the Lease as hereinafter provided; 
  
 NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the rents reserved and of the covenants and agreements herein set forth, it is agreed that the Lease be hereby amended from and after the date hereof as follows: 
  
 1.  Original Tenant hereby assigns and transfers the Lease to Assuming Tenant, and Assuming Tenant hereby
assumes the Lease and all obligations and responsibilities of the tenant under the Lease to the same effect as if Assuming Tenant had executed the Lease as the tenant in the first instance. 
  
 2.  In consideration for John Wiley & Sons, Inc. becoming the Assuming Tenant, Landlord hereby agrees to make a one-time payment to Original
Tenant in the amount of one hundred and ninety thousand dollars ($190,000). Such payment is due and payable upon the execution of this Amendment #3. 
  
 3.  Except as is hereinabove set forth, all term, provisions and covenants of the Lease shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


 








  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of
the date and year first above written. 
  
  
 
	 ORIGINAL TENANT: WILEY PUBLISHING, INC.
 	 	 LANDLORD: CROSSPOINT SEVEN, LLC
 
	 
	 By:
 	 	 /S/    LOU
PERAGALLO      
 
	 	 By:
 	 	 /S/    GREGORY C.
GURNIK        
 

	 Printed:
 	 	 Lou Peragallo
 	 	 Printed:
 	 	 Gregory C. Gurnik
 
	 Title:
 	 	 VP, Operations
 	 	 Title:
 	 	 Member
 
	 
	  	 	 ASSUMING TENANT:JOHN WILEY &
 SONS, INC
 
	 
	  	 	  	 	 By:
 	 	 /S/    ELLIS E. COUSENS
      
 

	  	 	  	 	 Printed:
 	 	 Ellis E. Cousens
 
	  	 	  	 	  	 	 Executive Vice President, Chief
 Financial and Operations Officer