r f 

(). 

", ~/ .j 

/ 

THE·' A'l."'lI"ORNEY GENERAL 

. . 

anAL))> C. ),1,ANN 

.X;1(~~~X ATTORNEY GENEIRAlr .. 

···.·oFTEXAS 

.()pinion No.p-S3~ . 

00432 

Han. GeCj). W. COX 

State Health Officer . 

.AU$tin~ ~~.)\:a;s. 

. '". ,. 

Re: .. May the CorOl of .birth certificate 

of the Texlls .r)epartUlento£· Hejith 

i"l: ,ina~optedcMld reveal two . 

·mothers.if~he repol"tofadopti,9n 

fQrwa'l':del~ fro.n; a IHstrict Cou.rt 

'hame$; t)voi.vo~enas having adopted 

lOilidminor chHd? , 

," .' 

.' We.al:e il):l'eceipt ofyo)l:r lettel:'of March Ill, which. reads as 

follows:. 

. ."W e havethel'.~port .~f.an.adoption • in tlie 7 1st .. Dis-. 

. ~rictCourt.()fl;J.al"}'isori Co.\.Intynaming M.rs. Mamie M. 

Mo()re ,afemesQle.'llnd Miss LillieMer:r.bache.l' ashav- . 

ing.adoptedM.argal'et.i;li:r.ahethMcClurean,dotherchHdre·n. 

"Unde.rtheadopti.on lawof),1ay 8. 1935, as affect,. 

ing.theStateBllr~Il)i, ~l1e S;tate Registral'. is.reqllired to 

r'emove the cel'tiflciite of Ilatlll'albil'thalldplace in its 

stead a bil'th certi~it:ate £or the child shQwing the pli/.l'ents 

• . by adoptiOn; '. . 

"Yollrde.partmenthas ruled that the words 'by 

" ·li/.dopt.ion~ s~Ql1.j;dnot be shown on the certificate, but that 

. the names ofthfl.adopting pal'entS should be shown as. 

the natuulpa.rents pf thet:htJd., The adopted form·of 

bi!tll.certif.icate·fol:Texaf!P.l'ovidesfor but one, mother • 

. ~~. ifi't'ollQwing the liiwitappeaJ"s that in thlf! case the 

~'ri1.eli -<>f tWo mt)thers must appear on the certificate • 

.: . A coPy or thE!apopted fo.r,m of birth certificate is enclosed~ 

. Plejise}dvis~. ~st()how th~ ·1;>.itth certificate of this .child 

sho,wing'il<Noqlothers shou14be wri.tte~." . :'. .. .: . 

We'\vish tocallyqur attention to Article 46a. Section 1:. of Vernon's Annotated.CiyUStatlltes wp.ich wequ.ote in full: 

.. ". 

r' ~ : 

II II I, , I ii " L [ t 

I 'I ·11 -' I . 
" .. ;", )." 

H;l1>Jl.Qeo. W. Cox. ,Aprill9. 1939. Page 2 ,. 

004.33 , ' 

, ,;. Any .idldt :re$).dellct o£ ~hi$ stllte. may petition theqi$" 

trtct cOurt i.ntlle di$trict of hip residence or in the dis-trict 

Cit thereSide:qee. qftliechjJd tobeadop-ted tor leave '-t$ adopt 

·ami.norchi.ld;s:u:cli petition shaij setfQrth the flict rE!levari' 

to petiti.One;rand chi.id.and ,be veri{ied by the amdliv~to£ the 

petitioner.:aut~suchpetj.tiQnmade by married persons 

skaU be, gr~nted unless thehU.sban:d:-~,q wife shall join there~ 

in.exc-eptfrtg whi!n sU,chpetitioner shall be. marriell to th¢ 

natura;J.father oi,m9the,r; then su-ch jpciner by such father ,or 

l,:no±her shall. b.e unnecessary." . ' ,. .. 

, 'Sa~dsectiOnproYid1:! stOi- the adopth;1n 01. a mbio.r cMl-d by. "any 

adUJt. r.esident':\l£thiss:t;l.tE!;" Ii refers to thea.dQpte'q pllrty <loS "petit!oner" 

lnidstipti:latest4a't-'if the petittcln fprllMp#on is made by ~,Il m;,u-rled ~r­

"$;oii"the,latt,h!s ~u:sband (,,:t'y.>J.{e must join therein. ltdoesnot prO'\Tide.for 

'Iljtij,nt adopti$of"a" mirii:l:r"21itldGther 'tIian th<l.t by ~. hUSband and wife. , . ' . . 't~:<~ 

, 'thelitl1:~itg¢,liI(the, statute is clear ande)Cplj.cit tGthee£~ect 

tha~a.dopti,OnOf a mi.np,!-, chUd in ':rexas m,ust he made by a. $in/ile pers$nor 

'.:a.' mar.ri.e:o ' pe~~hn. jl)hl~dbyhU!lb;1n!l'orwtf:e in the pro,Ce¢<'Iings. lidoes not 

p:r.o~de .f:..or the ad~til)nGf:.. ,a mhtOr t':hil~ by two; or .more single perso'ltS 

,j;i)itt't.lY or by a sinilepersottand a marriedperso.n joi.ntlY. Wea,re of the: 

. 'Gpinj:Qn that,t)ie 'la-Why. implicatiQrt' forbids ;al1"joint·~dGpth)ll,. proceedings 

Gther thattth9sebya :lirtsbilnd itndwife; Con$~q,uelltly.wequ.estiGn the vilHd'" 

Uya£. aGopti~n'p:rQ'ceedlngs ,sq-ehas !li.d1c:atedby th,e fir st paragraph ef your 

l~tter whicll:re~erredto~JiJ1rs.MainiE;M. ~cn:>re, a feme sole. ind Miss 

Lillie Merzbaclier as having Illl0p.ted Ma,rg1l-retEli;!Oabeth McClure and othe'r 

children. ,; . 

,Fti.rth-ermoriol. the-sux-estg'uidi? to ii ¢orredic;ollstruction (If a 

statute is secured by as.certaming'th.e'purpase iis makers intended it 

,Should accomplish:. Th'eGbjedof'the Texas Legislatu.re .in enacting the 

,stilte 'sa4option statute was to secure for the adopted child a legal statu,s 

.' whi-ch would most c1oselyapproximate that prnviGed by natural pa.rents and 

the home of natar<lol p.al"ent». Thepuplicillterestand the wel£ilre of the child 

a.re dependent upon an {nterp,l'etatio.it':O£ the adopti.pnistatute which will not 

doviGlenceto natural laWs •• To allow'an adoptionbytwG mothers 0.1' two 

,father's jointly wo.uld ,create .a 'co.m~lkated and irreg)llar domestic positicm 

{pr a minor. in ,c'Ontravention of the' policy of the statute and the purpose of 

the Legislature. " 

The case of Krugv. DaYis. 87 India.ria 590. is authority for the 

construction we plac'e'tin the ad6piionstatute of. Texas.: The statute under 

c'Onsider'at~nn there; ;Revised Civil Statutes. 1 881; Sections 823j;hr:GIlgh 828. 

pr<rirtded that a.ny person desirOJlsofadQpting any chnd may file his pe.titioil . ,-" "' .. 

. .;. }" ;"l 
Rono Ge.oo W. Cox, April 19, 1939, Page 3 00434: 

therefor in the circuit er other proper court in the county in which s.aid 

child resides, etc •. It W<l,sco.ntenped that under the st.atute, no two persons, not even husb<l,nd and wife, could unite in pr.oceedings to. adQpt a 

chilli. 'the court rejected this contention, holding that'a husb<l,nd and wife 

couid effect <I, joint ~doptiori, buts<l,id by way of dl.ciu,m: 

"It would be inconsistent with the general scope and 

purpos:.! Of this statute to perrpittwo or more pe.rSQllS rep~ 

resenting different fa.inilies to jobftlyor concurrent~y adopt 

the same chUd, but that objection,' in oUr estimation, dOeS 

not apply to joint proceedmgsby husband <l,nd wife f~rthe 

adoption of <I, childo .. • .f. '. 

On petiti(m fl;Jr rehe;l.ring in the ab.ove C.<I,62, tlie fOFmer'OIiinion. was sustainel'l: . . ... .. 

"CouU:seLmisapprehend the effect O£olU' Qpinion tithey .' 

r.eally sUpp.Qse it to detlare tb:at ariitwo persens 6th;;r than .•. 

a husband andwi;e maY aliopt ~ same chi.1d. No such~ean1Jl.g can possibly be given file opinion, ';l'hepecuUar relation .. 

. 0£ husband and wife, <l,nd the place. in their family and <I,££ecticm.s 

wh.ich the . law inWndsi;he<l,doptel'l chil~to t;!.ke;' we . considered 

.as matters exerting<l,c~:trol1iug influeu(;e up.onthecoustruc .... 

tiPll to begive.n t'ne statute and a,s milking itpraperto ~jlidge 

thathusbl'lld <l,nd<wif¢might unite inad£ipiling a chHii,.<ind·:thus 

make it .a<;:hi!dliJ;f bji)i;h •. 'We. neither h,e:ld<>r mea.n~ tn hold that 

pe.rSOns . other than husband and wife. might join, ii(;r,.f6 there 

,anything jrI whaj; we sa.i.d le.<I,ding ,to such a,<;qnclu'sit1n, " 

We hill¢! thatun.der Artk.~e 46A., Selitton i;'9fYe~on's An.npo;-

t;ited .Civil statutes, apji)ve quoteA, a jointad:op#d.n of arlljnor chUd by two 

wO~E!n, both femes sale, is illegal, .and tha:t the. birttt c.~rtificat¢ qfthe 

'fexasDeparlment of ;Health for a.nadopte.d .child may nO.Ll'evea1i;wa mothers, 

. even thpugh the report.Q£adopj;ion from a. dist1.-rd courtn;l.mes tWtl. single 

wpmen'.;!.s having;l.dop.t¢d a minorda~1d • .A.doptiQll prQceeaIngs niiming two 

women <l,s having adop~done .min.or child are iavaHd and must be re·ferred 

to the dist.rict court of origin. for cQrr.ectj:!tIn. ' . 

Since the. report !J.f adoption accordit'tgtoyol1t:' letter ,refe·rs . 

to "Margaret Eli'z;!l-pe,th M'cCJure and other chHdren." aEl having been adllpted 

by Mrs. Mamie M .. MQore,a €emesoie. and. Miss Lillie Mer~bacher,~here 

is a po.sSibJ.lity thate.ach .of the two WDmenail,opteddHferent chUd.ren. This 

shOUld he investigated. (UI1,derscoring ours) . 

i 

I 

[ 

I 

I 

I 

r 

I 

I 

I 

I 

! 
• 

, -, H .. oli • . Geo. W. Cox~\, April 19, .I.9l_9., Pag~-~ 

DS:omb:da 

APPROVJi:O: . • 

lsi Gera).9C. Mann 

'.,'.-

• 

. yours' very truly 

AT'l,'OR~EY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

.~ .. 

lsi Dick Stout 

Dkk Stout 

.Assistant