alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6113. Appointment and compensation of employees by President pro tempore of Senate

Effective October 1, 1979, the President pro tempore is authorized to appoint and fix the compensation of such employees as he deems appropriate: Provided, That the gross compensation paid to such employees shall not exceed $123,000 each fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 96–38, title I, §101, July 25, 1979, 93 Stat. 111.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 61k of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1979.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Increases in Compensation

Increases in compensation for Senate officers and employees under authority of Federal Pay Comparability Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 91–656), see Salary Directives of President pro tempore of the Senate, set out as notes under section 4571 of this title.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-01-046 August 22, 2001

CONTACT: Breck Henderson 

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

MICHAEL S. PECK NAMED RESIDENT INSPECTOR 

AT COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has named Michael S. Peck Resident Inspector at

the Colombia Generating Station. He joins Senior Resident Inspector George Replogle at the

Richland, Wash., nuclear plant.

Mr. Peck earned a bachelor's degree in chemical engineering and a master's degree in nuclear

engineering from the University of Missouri in 1983. Following graduation, Mr. Peck worked as a

reactor and operations engineer at the Clinton, Browns Ferry and Sequoyah nuclear plants. In 1990

Mr. Peck joined the NRC as a resident inspector at the Dresden nuclear plant, near Morris, Illinois. In

1993 he went to the U.S. Department of Energy at Hanford, Washington, where he worked as a facility

representative. He returned to the NRC in 2000.

Mr. Peck, his wife and three children, will reside in West Richland.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They

serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections and monitoring

significant work projects. 

###
Exhibit 3(ii)


RESOLUTIONS OF THE


BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF


GUARANTY FEDERAL BANCSHARES, INC.





OCTOBER 16, 2003








The meeting of the board of directors of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. a Corporation was held at the office of Guaranty Bank, 1341 West Battlefield, Springfield, Missouri, on the 16 th day of October, 2003.





WHEREAS, the Board has been advised that the Fiscal Year; Annual Audit shall be amended to a calendar year end.





THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the bylaws of the Corporation be amended to read as follows:





ARTICLE VIII





Fiscal Year; Annual Audit





The fiscal year of the Corporation shall end on the last day of December of each year. The Corporation shall be subject to an annual audit as of the end of its fiscal year by independent public accountants appointed by and responsible to the board of directors.








The undersigned, Secretary of the Bank, does hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an extract of the minutes of a meeting of the Board of Directors held on October 16, 2003, a quorum being present, at which meeting the foregoing resolution was approved by at least a majority vote.





/s/ E. Lorene Thomas


Secretary
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-029 April 3, 2002

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC TO MEET WITH AMERGEN TO DISCUSS OYSTER CREEK PLANT

PERFORMANCE

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of AmerGen Energy

Company, LLC, on Thursday, April 11, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual assessment of

safety performance at the Oyster Creek nuclear power plant. The facility is located in Lacey Township,

N.J., and operated by AmerGen.

 The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 1 p.m. at

the Lacey Township Municipal Building, 818 W. Lacey Road in the township’s Forked River section. 

Before the session is adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the public on the

safety performance of the Oyster Creek plant, as well as the role of the NRC in ensuring safe plant

operation.

 The performance period to be discussed is April 1, 2001, to December 31, 2001. In addition,

NRC staff will provide an overview of the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process.

 A letter sent from the NRC Region I office to AmerGen discusses the performance of the plant

during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the NRC

web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/oc_2001q4.pdf

 Current performance information for the Oyster Creek plant is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/OC/oc_chart.html

###
### §5352. Delivery of Congressional Pictorial Directory

(a) None of the funds made available in any fiscal year may be used to deliver a printed copy of the Congressional Pictorial Directory to the office of a Member of the House of Representatives (including a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to the Congress).

(b) This section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2019 and each succeeding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 115–244, div. B, title I, §117, Sept. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 2930.)
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93021, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 151.61 Definitions. The following are general definitions for the purposes of this subpart: ( a ) *Clean kg.* ‘Clean kg’ means kilograms of clean yield as defined in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Clean yield.* Except for the purposes of carbonized fibers, “Clean yield” means the absolute clean content (that is, all that portion of the merchandise which consists exclusively of wool or hair free of all vegetable and other foreign material, containing by weight 12 percent of moisture and 1.5 percent of material removable from the wool or hair by extraction with alcohol, and having an ash content of not over 0.5 percent by weight), less an allowance, equal by weight to 0.5 percent of the absolute clean content plus 60 percent of the vegetable matter present, but not exceeding 15 percent by weight of the absolute clean content, for wool or hair that would ordinarily be lost during commercial cleaning operations.
( c ) For the purposes of carbonized fibers, the term clean yield means the condition as entered.
( d ) *Sampling unit.* “Sampling unit” means all the similar packages covered by one entry or withdrawal containing wool or hair of the same kind or same general condition and character, produced in the same country, packed in substantially the same manner, and entered as or found to be subject to the same rate of entry.
( e ) *General sample.* “General sample” means the composite of the individual portions of wool or hair drawn from a sampling unit.
[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17470, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51269, Dec. 21, 1988]
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.4 Internal-revenue marks; erasure.

Internal-revenue brands or marks on casks or other containers previously exported from the United States must be erased at the importer's expense under Customs supervision before their delivery from Customs custody.
### §5102. Appointment of consultants by Speaker, Majority Leader, and Minority Leader of House; compensation

(a) The Speaker, Majority Leader, and Minority Leader of the House of Representatives are each authorized to appoint and fix the compensation of one consultant, on a temporary or intermittent basis, at a daily rate of compensation not in excess of the per diem equivalent of the highest gross rate of annual compensation which may be paid to employees of a standing committee of the House.

(b) This section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 1999 and each succeeding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 105–275, title I, §107, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2439.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 74a–9 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Congressional Operations Appropriations Act, 1999, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1999.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          24,986
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,481,121
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,636,125
<PP&E>                                         279,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,729
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,852,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,838
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       229,801
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,578,170
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,852,809
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,673
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               342,026
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (306,353)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, Louis LeCalsey, III, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December 31, 2007of Tufco Technologies, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: February 14, 2008         /s/ Louis LeCalsey, III   Louis LeCalsey, III   President and Chief Executive Officer
BDO  INTERNATIONAL
Certified  Public  Accountants
29th  Floor  Wing  On  Centre
111  Connaught  Road  Central
Hong  Kong
Telephone:  (852)  2541-5041
Facsimile:  (852)  2815-0002


             CONSENT  OF  INDEPENDENT  CERTIFIED  PUBLIC  ACCOUNTANTS

Asian  Star  Development  Inc.

We hereby consent to the use in the Form 10-SB (the Form) constituting a part of
this Registration  Statement of our report dated April 23, 1999, relating to the
consolidated  financial  statements of Asian Star  Development,  Inc.,  which is
contained in that Form.

/s/  BDO  International
    December 1, 1999
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No. 20-23179-Civ-COOKE/GOODMAN 

MOUNTECH IP LLC, 

Plaintiff 

v. 

HMD AMERICA, INC., 

Defendant. 

________________________________/

AGREED MOTION FOR 60 DAY EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1 of the United States District Court for the Southern District of 

Florida, Defendant, HMD AMERICA, INC. (“Defendant”) moves for an agreed 60 day extension 

of time, until November 2, 2020 to respond to the Complaint, and in support thereof state as 

follows: 

1. On July 31, 2020, Plaintiff filed a complaint in this action against the Defendant. 

2. Defendant was served on August 11, 2020, making Defendant’s response to the 

Complaint due on September 1, 2020. 

3. Defendant has been served and has engaged the undersigned but requires an 

additional sixty (60) days to investigate Plaintiff’s patents and infringement allegations and 

respond to the Complaint. Plaintiff’s counsel agrees to same. 

4. A proposed order granting this agreed motion for extension of time is attached 

hereto as Exhibit A. 
2 

CERTIFICATION UNDER LOCAL RULE 7.1

Pursuant to S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1(a)(3), I hereby certify that counsel for Defendant has 

communicated with counsel for Plaintiff via e-mail regarding the relief sought herein. All parties 

agree to the relief requested herein. 

Dated: August 25, 2020 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Joseph W. Bain

JOSEPH W. BAIN, ESQ. 

Florida Bar No. 860360 

Email Address: jbain@shutts.com 

SHUTTS & BOWEN LLP 

1100 CityPlace Tower 

525 Okeechobee Boulevard 

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 

Telephone: (561) 835-8500 

Facsimile: (561) 650-8530 

Attorneys for Defendant HMD America, Inc 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 25th day of August 2020, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of court by using the CM/ECF system, which will automatically send email notification of such filing to all counsel of record. 

/s/ Joseph W. Bain
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. III-02-021 April 17, 2002

CONTACT: Victor Dricks (301) 415-8204 E-mail: vld@nrc.gov

NRC DISPATCHES INSPECTOR TO DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION

FOLLOWING DISCOVERY OF RADIOACTIVE PARTICLES OFF-SITE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is reviewing an incident in which microscopic radioactive

particles were recovered from four individuals, their clothing, residences and hotel rooms after leaving

the Davis-Besse nuclear power plant in Ohio.

Radiation protection personnel at the Davis-Besse plant were notified on March 22 by the

Oconee nuclear facility in South Carolina that discrete radioactive particles were found on a worker’s

sleeve. The worker was undergoing in-processing for work at the Oconee facility, and had last worked

at Davis-Besse.

 FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company operates the Davis-Besse nuclear power plant near

Oak Harbor, Ohio. The licensee’s investigation to date has determined that a total of 13 discrete

particles were recovered from four individuals, their clothing, residences and hotel rooms in Ohio,

South Carolina, Texas and Virginia. The individuals had worked on steam generators at Davis-Besse,

which shut down in mid-February for a refueling outage.

A senior health physicist from the NRC’s Region III Office in Lisle, Il., has been dispatched to

the Davis-Besse plant to assess the possible dose consequences to the four contract employees who

visited Davis-Besse before traveling to other sites and to evaluate the licensee’s investigation into the

matter. FirstEnergy is attempting to determine how the particles were transported off-site.

Preliminary dose calculations by the licensee indicate no adverse health effects are expected to

either the workers or members of the public from the tiny particles. The particles are believed to be

byproducts of the fission process with relatively low levels of activity. 

 ###
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1999
<CASH>                                          23,971
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,455
<INVENTORY>                                     84,051
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               226,313
<PP&E>                                         476,039
<DEPRECIATION>                                 218,696
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 554,731
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          146,964
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              133
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,870
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   554,731
<SALES>                                        184,916
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               184,916
<CGS>                                          159,039
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  159,039
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   752
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    60
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,636
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,232
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,681
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,551
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,551
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
        

</TABLE>
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-019 February 14, 2002

 

NRC ISSUES THE U.S. NATIONAL REPORT FOR CONVENTION

 ON NUCLEAR SAFETY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued the ìUnited States of America National Report

for the Convention on Nuclear Safety.î This report describes the U.S. Governmentís fulfillment of its

obligations under the Convention, and demonstrates how the U.S. achieves a high level of safety for its

nuclear power plants.

Two key regulatory initiatives highlighted in the report are NRCís improvement of its reactor 

oversight process and focusing the attention of the nuclear industry on programs and activities most

important to safety. The report will be peer reviewed by parties to the Convention at the Second

Review Meeting taking place in April in Vienna.

The Convention, to which the Senate gave consent to ratification in 1999, emphasizes that

nuclear safety is a sovereign responsibility. Countries are obligated to report on how nuclear power

safety is achieved. Every three years the 53 participating countries must submit reports on their

programs for peer review as an incentive to achieve the highest possible levels of safety.

ìThe NRC uses a number of national programs and processes to ensure that plant safety is

maintained and to meet the obligations of the Convention on Nuclear Safety,î the report states. ìThese

are a well-established licensing process; the newly revised process for reactor oversight; the Accident

Sequence Precursor program; the Program for Resolving Generic Safety Issues; programs for

rulemaking; for decommissioning; for regulatory research; for public participation; and for handling

petitions; allegations, and differing professional views and opinions.î

The report discusses the national nuclear regulatory programs that meet the obligations of the

Convention, primary current nuclear safety initiatives, and significant regulatory accomplishments since

the first peer review meeting in 1998. In addition, the report highlights the NRCís major objectives ñ

to maintain plant safety; to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, and realism of NRC activities and

decisions; to increase public confidence; and to reduce unnecessary regulatory burden ñ and describes

the activities that the NRC has initiated to meet those objectives.

Copies of the ìUnited States of America National Report for the Convention on Nuclear

Safetyî (NUREG-1650) will be available at the NRC's Public Electronic Reading Room link at:
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1650/ and at the NRC Public Document

Room in Rockville, Maryland.

###
### §62. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 62 was editorially reclassified as section 6592 of this title.