alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23638]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>3639]


State of Minnesota (Amendment <greek-i>1)

    In accordance with a notice received from the Department of 
Homeland Security--Federal Emergency Management Agency--effective 
September 27, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to 
establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning September 
14, 2004, and continuing through September 27, 2004.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is December 6, 2004 and for 
economic injury the deadline is July 7, 2005.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: October 15, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-23638 Filed 10-21-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A1087. LINDA CARTER v. ZACK CARTER, JR.

Zack Carter, Jr., filed a motion for contempt after his ex-wife failed to comply

with the parties’ divorce decree provisions as to the marital home. The trial court

initially denied the motion but ordered Linda Carter to sell or refinance the home by

August 1, 2015. After she failed to do so, the court found her in contempt. Linda

Carter then filed this direct appeal. Jurisdiction, however, appears to lie in the

Supreme Court.

Under the Georgia Constitution of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (6), the

Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction over “[a]ll divorce and alimony cases.”

“[A]n appeal from the judgment in a contempt action seeking to enforce any portion

of [a] divorce decree other than child custody is ancillary to divorce and alimony and

falls within [the Supreme] Court’s jurisdiction over ‘divorce and alimony cases.’

[Cits.]” Rogers v. McGahee, 278 Ga. 287, 288 (1) (602 SE2d 582) (2004); see also

Morris v. Surges, 284 Ga. 748, 750 (2) (670 SE2d 84) (2008). Because this case

appearsto fall within the Supreme Court’sjurisdiction, it is hereby TRANSFERRED

to that Court.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/17/2016

March 17, 2016
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# OPEN MEETINGS OF:

Thursday, October 21, 2004, 10 a.m.; Thursday, October 28, 2004, 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# STATUS:

These meetings will be open to the public.

The following item scheduled for the open meeting of Thursday, October 21, 2004, has been rescheduled for the open meeting of Thursday, October 28, 2004: Explanation and Justification for Political Committee Rulemaking.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Robert W. Biersack, Acting Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 04-23611  Filed 10-18-04; 3:22 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
8/16/22, 12:06 AM Screenshot_20220802-190646_Messages.jpg

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Fw199qeTaIcQdoc7Rd-d8iS6bZ3e7IIF 1/1

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-30 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-03-017 March 21, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC TO DISCUSS ANNUAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

OF OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of AmerGen Energy

Company, LLC, on Friday, March 28, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual assessment of safety

performance at the Oyster Creek nuclear power plant. The facility is located in Lacey Township, N.J.,

and operated by AmerGen.

 The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m.

at the Lacey Township Municipal Building, 818 W. Lacey Road in Lacey. Before the session is

adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the public on the safety performance

of the Oyster Creek plant, as well as the role of the NRC in ensuring safe plant operation.

 The performance period to be discussed is January 1 to December 31, 2002. In addition, NRC

staff will provide an overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process works.

 A letter sent from the NRC Region I Office to AmerGen addresses the performance of the plant

during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the NRC

web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/oc_2002q4.pdf

 “Overall, Oyster Creek operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and fully

met all cornerstone objectives,” the letter says. As a result, the NRC plans to conduct only baseline

inspections at the plant through March 31, 2004. However, the NRC also intends to closely monitor

the plant staff’s response to a substantive cross-cutting issue in the area of human performance. 

Specifically, the NRC staff has noted instances of lapses in human performance with regard to

adherence to procedures.

 In addition, the letter notes: “As you are aware, since the terrorist attacks of September 11,

2001, the NRC has issued several Orders and threat advisories to enhance security capabilities and

improve guard force readiness. We have conducted inspections to review your implementation of

these requirements and have monitored your actions in response to changing threat conditions. For

calendar year 2003, we plan to continue these inspections, conduct portions of the security baseline

inspection program, as well as perform additional inspections to evaluate your compliance with new

requirements that may be ordered. “
 Current performance information for Oyster Creek is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/OC/oc_chart.html

###
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1830

HARRISON T. ANDERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

W. H. HAND, JR., President, THT Enterprises,

Incorporated,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (CA-94-127-4-BO)

Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 17, 1996

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harrison T. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Bradley Arthur Elliott,

Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Anderson v. Hand, No. CA-94-127-4-BO (E.D.N.C. May

23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Ali Reza KOLAHI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terry L. STEWART; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-15742.

D.C. No. CV-01-00239-SMM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 28, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Arizona state prisoner Ali R. Kolahi appeals pro se the judgment dismissing his civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Barren v. Harrington,*152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order), and we affirm.

Kolahi contends the district court erred by dismissing his action because he was denied access to the courts. We disagree.

To state a claim for denial of access to the courts, an inmate must allege that prison officials hindered the prisoner’s capability to file a legal claim attacking his conviction or challenging the conditions of his confinement. *See Lewis v. Casey,*518 U.S. 343, 355, 116 S.Ct. 2174, 135 L.Ed.2d 606 (1996). Because Kolahi’s complaint alleged neither, the district court properly dismissed his action and denied his motion for reconsideration. *See Barren,*152 F.3d at 1195.

We deny Kolahi’s motion filed March 25, 2002.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
H. R. 145

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

An Act

To designate the Federal building located at 290 Broadway in New York, New

York, as the ‘‘Ted Weiss Federal Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal building located at 290 Broadway in New York,

New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ted Weiss Federal

Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ted

Weiss Federal Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Salon Carduci.

Motion granted. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation (the Company),
hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    CHRIS BIEDERMANNChris Biedermann Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 2, 2009
#### Katherine T. New and Another v. Anna M. Burnett and Another.

Motion denied. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov 

No. III-02-052 September 30, 2002

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $3,000 FINE AGAINST INDIANA FIRM FOR LOSING A

FIXED GAUGE WITH RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $3,000 fine against Alt &

Witzig Engineering, Inc., Carmel, Indiana, for losing control of a portable moisture density gauge

containing a sealed radiation source and not reporting the loss to the NRC immediately.

On May 2, a portable gauge fell from a pickup truck while being transported from a

residence in Niles, Michigan, where it was stored overnight, to a temporary job site in LaPorte,

Indiana. The worker had failed to adequately block and brace the gauge in the open bed of the

truck and failed to close the tailgate on the truck properly. The gauge contained sealed radiation

sources of cesium-137 and americium-241/beryllium.

A member of the public found the gauge along public highway Route 51 locked in its

case with the radiation sources locked in the shielded positions and notified the local police

department. As such, the gauge did not represent a safety hazard.

The NRC was not notified until almost eight hours after the loss was identified.

The NRC conducted an inspection into the circumstances of the incident in May-June and

identified three violations of federal regulations: (1) failure to block and brace the gauge during

transportation; (2) failure to immediately notify the NRC of the lost gauge; and (3) failure to

store the gauge in an authorized location.

The company has until October 28 to either pay the fine or to protest it. If the fine is

protested and subsequently imposed by the NRC staff, the company may request a hearing.

The letter notifying Alt & Witzig Engineering, Inc. of the proposed fine will be posted to

the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/enforcement/actions/.

###
§ 190.6 Authority to sign or electronically certify drawback documents. ( a ) Documents listed in paragraph (b) of this section must be signed or electronically certified only by one of the following: ( 1 ) The president, a vice president, secretary, treasurer, or any other employee legally authorized to bind the corporation;
( 2 ) A full partner of a partnership;
( 3 ) The owner of a sole proprietorship;
( 4 ) Any employee of the business entity with a power of attorney;
( 5 ) An individual acting on his or her own behalf; or
( 6 ) A licensed customs broker with a power of attorney to sign the applicable drawback document.
( b ) The following documents require execution in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) Drawback entries;
( 2 ) Notices of Intent to Export, Destroy, or Return Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback;
( 3 ) Certifications to assign the right to claim drawback (*see* §§ 190.28 and 190.82); and
( 4 ) Abstracts, schedules and extracts from monthly abstracts, and bills of materials and formulas, if not included as part of a drawback claim.
( c ) The following documents (*see* also part 177 of this chapter) may be executed by one of the persons described in paragraph (a) of this section or by any other individual legally authorized to bind the person (or entity) for whom the document is executed: ( 1 ) A letter of notification of intent to operate under a general manufacturing drawback ruling under § 190.7;
( 2 ) An application for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling under § 190.8;
( 3 ) An application for waiver of prior notice under § 190.91 or a 1-time waiver of prior notice under § 190.36;
( 4 ) An application for approval of accelerated payment of drawback under § 190.92; and
( 5 ) An application for certification in the Drawback Compliance Program under § 190.193.
§ 19.38 Supervision of exportation. ( a ) *Sales ticket withdrawals.* Conditionally duty-free merchandise withdrawn under the sales ticket procedure for exportation shall be exported only under Customs supervision as provided in this section and § 19.39 of this part. General Customs supervision shall be exercised as provided in § 19.4 of this part and § 101.2(c) of this chapter, and may consist of spot checks of exportation transactions, examination of articles being exported, and audits of the proprietor's records.
( b ) *Supervision of ATF bonded exports.* Customs officers may conduct general supervision of exportations of cigarettes and cigars from ATF export bonded warehouses (see 27 CFR part 290) in conjunction with exportation from duty-free stores.
[T.D. 92-81, 57 FR 37698, Aug. 20, 1992, as amended by T.D. 98-22, 63 FR 11825, Mar. 11, 1998]
#### § 111.54 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 10.8
                                                                    ------------

PalWeb Corporation
1607 West Commerce Street
Dallas, TX  75208

                                                           January 10, 2003


Lyle W. Miller
2810 Hannah Blvd.
P.O. Box 4697
East Lansing, MI 48823

         RE:      STOCK OPTIONS

Dear Lyle:

         PalWeb has heretofore granted to you the following options to purchase
shares of PalWeb's common stock, par value $0.0001 per share ("Options"):

         -------------- ----------------- -------------- ------------------
         Number                                          Current
         of Options     Option Price      Grant Date     Expiration Date
         -------------- ----------------- -------------- ------------------
         50,000         $2.00             5/11/01        5/11/11
         -------------- ----------------- -------------- ------------------
         100,000        $3.125            4/11/02        4/11/12
         -------------- ----------------- -------------- ------------------
         25,000         $1.60             6/26/02        6/26/12
         -------------- ----------------- -------------- ------------------

Notwithstanding the terms and provisions of the stock option agreements
previously executed by you and PalWeb with respect to such Options, all of such
Options are hereby amended to provide that (i) they shall be fully vested as of
the Closing Date, and may be exercised, in whole or in part, at any time and
from time to time until the expiration date; and (ii) the expiration date shall
be January 10, 2008. Except as so amended, the terms of the options shall remain
in full force and effect. PalWeb recognizes that such modifications in terms
will result in a different accounting treatment for such options.

                                          Sincerely,

                                          PALWEB CORPORATION

                                          By:    /s/Warren F. Kruger
                                                 ------------------------------
                                          Name:  Warren F. Kruger
                                                 ------------------------------
                                          Title: President
                                                 ------------------------------
Accepted and Agreed:

/s/ Lyle W. Miller
--------------------
Lyle W. Miller
#### § 200.735-101 Purpose.

The purpose of the regulations in this part is to maintain the highest standards of honesty, integrity, impartiality, and conduct on the part of all employees of the U.S. International Trade Commission and to maintain public confidence that the business of the Commission is being conducted in accordance with such standards.

[31 FR 2593, Feb. 10, 1966, as amended at 46 FR 17542, Mar. 19, 1981]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                     Washington, D.C.  20549


                          FORM 10-K/A


     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 
           For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997


Purpose:  To supplement in part Part IV, Item 14(c) of Company's
          previously filed Form 10-K in order to file as an exhibit
          the Annual Servicing Report of Company's Independent
          Public Accountants. 


                Commission File Nos. 333-36405-02


              HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER LOAN TRUST 1997-2 
     (Exact name of Registrant as specified in Department
      of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service Form SS-4)

HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION
(Administrator of the Trust)
(Exact name as specified in Administrator's charter)


            DELAWARE                      36-3670374             
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer Identification
incorporation of Administrator)   Number of Registrant


 2700 SANDERS ROAD, PROSPECT HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS         60070     
(Address of principal executive offices of           (Zip Code)
Administrator)


Administrator's telephone number, including area code(847)564-5000












<PAGE>













                           SIGNATURES




     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Administrator has duly caused
this amendment to be signed on behalf of the Household Consumer
Loan Trust 1997-2 by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.




                             HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION,
                         as Administrator of and on behalf of the

                           HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER LOAN TRUST 1997-2
                                    (Registrant)




Date:  April 3, 1998          By:/s/John W. Blenke              
                                 John W. Blenke
                                 Assistant Secretary



















<PAGE>







                          Exhibit Index


Exhibit No.    Exhibit                                      Page
No.

99             Copy of Independent Public Accountants          4
               Annual Servicing Report dated March 26, 1998.
#### Frank Mayole, Appellant, v. B. Crystal & Son, Inc., Respondent.

Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.