alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Fact Sheet Alphabetical List

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

              - June 13, 2012ACC 
Air Combat Command (ACC), headquartered at Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Va., is one of ten major commands in the United States Air Force. (Current July 31, 2023)
 
              - June 29, 2020ACC Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations  
ACC Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations are a joint effort of the A3 and A6 Directorate. All spectrum dependent equipment must have a valid certification prior to funding obligation and a valid frequency license prior to equipment operation. The branch will guide customers to ensure radio frequency
 
              - May 1, 2023ACC Weapons Safety Division (SEW) 
The ACC Weapons Safety Division (SEW) is a team of highly-skilled safety professionals that manage the weapons safety portion of the mishap prevention program across ACC. Responsibilities of the division include explosives site planning; assessing explosives risk to operations; nuclear surety;
 
              - Dec. 27, 2022AFNIC History 
Even though the Air Force became an independent service in 1947, its initial communications systems changed very little from the time it was the Army Air Forces. In point-to-point communications, for example, the old Army Command and Administrative Network formed the pattern of operations. The
 
              - July 11, 2023AGM-114 
The AGM-114 Hellfire missile system is a Semi Active Laser (SAL) system for use in conventional strike environments. The missile may be launched from a variety of airborne platforms to include unmanned aerial systems. (Current as of 1 Feb 2022)
 
              - Dec. 20, 2005AGM-130 Missile 
Mission The AGM-130 is a powered air-to-surface missile designed for high- and low-altitude strikes at standoff ranges against a variety of targets. Features Carrying forward the modular concept of the GBU-15 guided weapon system, the AGM-130 employs a rocket motor for extended range and an
 
              - Dec. 20, 2005AGM-65 Maverick 
The AGM-65 Maverick is a tactical, air-to-surface guided missile designed for close air support, interdiction and defense suppression mission. It provides stand-off capability and high probability of strike against a wide range of tactical targets, including light and heavy armored vehicles, air
 

-  ** 
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
-  ** 

-  ** 
- 1
- 2
- 3
-  **
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1529

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT

To amend title 11 of the United States Code with respect 

to the dismissal of certain involuntary cases.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1529 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Involuntary Bank3 ruptcy Improvement Act of 2003’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

5 Section 303 of title 11, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(l)(1) If—

8 ‘‘(A) the petition under this section is false or 

9 contains any materially false, fictitious, or fraudu10 lent statement; 

11 ‘‘(B) the debtor is an individual; and 

12 ‘‘(C) the court dismisses such petition; 

13 the court, upon motion of the debtor, shall expunge from 

14 the records of the court such petition, all the records relat15 ing to such petition in particular, and all references to 

16 such petition. 

17 ‘‘(2) If the debtor is an individual and the court dis18 misses a petition under this section, the court may enter 

19 an order prohibiting all consumer reporting agencies (as 

20 defined in section 603 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act) 

21 from making any consumer report (as defined in section 

22 603 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act) that contains any 
3

HR 1529 RFS 

1 information relating to such petition or to the case com2 menced by the filing of such petition.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1444

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for garnishment of military 

retired pay to satisfy a judgment against a retired member of the 

uniformed services for physically, sexually, or emotionally abusing a child. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2003

Ms. DEGETTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for garnishment of military retired pay to satisfy a judgment 

against a retired member of the uniformed services for 

physically, sexually, or emotionally abusing a child.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Abuse Account5 ability Enhancement Act’’.
2

•HR 1444 IH 

1 SEC. 2. GARNISHMENT OF MILITARY RETIRED PAY TO SAT2 ISFY JUDGMENT RENDERED FOR PHYS3 ICALLY, SEXUALLY, OR EMOTIONALLY ABUS4 ING A CHILD. 

5 (a) GARNISHMENT AUTHORITY.—Section 1408 of 

6 title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

7 end the following new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(l) GARNISHMENT TO SATISFY A JUDGMENT REN9 DERED FOR PHYSICALLY, SEXUALLY, OR EMOTIONALLY

10 ABUSING A CHILD.—(1) Any payment of retired pay that 

11 would otherwise be made to a member shall be paid (in 

12 whole or in part) by the Secretary concerned to another 

13 person if and to the extent expressly provided for in the 

14 terms of a child abuse garnishment order. 

15 ‘‘(2) In this section, the term ‘court order’ includes 

16 a child abuse garnishment order. 

17 ‘‘(3) In this subsection, the term ‘child abuse garnish18 ment order’ means a final decree issued by a court that—

19 ‘‘(A) is issued in accordance with the laws of 

20 the jurisdiction of that court; and 

21 ‘‘(B) provides in the nature of garnishment for 

22 the enforcement of a judgment rendered against the 

23 member for physically, sexually, or emotionally abus24 ing a child. 

25 ‘‘(4) For purposes of this subsection, a judgment ren26 dered for physically, sexually, or emotionally abusing a 
3

•HR 1444 IH 

1 child is any legal claim perfected through a final enforce2 able judgment, which claim is based in whole or in part 

3 upon the physical, sexual, or emotional abuse of an indi4 vidual under 18 years of age, whether or not that abuse 

5 is accompanied by other actionable wrongdoing, such as 

6 sexual exploitation or gross negligence. 

7 ‘‘(5) If the Secretary concerned is served with more 

8 than one court order with respect to the retired pay of 

9 a member, the disposable retired pay of the member shall 

10 be available to satisfy such court orders on a first-come, 

11 first-served basis, with any such process being satisfied 

12 out of such moneys as remain after the satisfaction of all 

13 such processes which have been previously served’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (l) of section 

15 1408 of title 10, United States Code, shall apply with re16 spect to court orders received by the Secretary concerned 

17 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-060 September 30, 2002

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC ASSIGNS NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR TO INDIAN POINT 3

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have selected Mark R. Cox as

the resident inspector at the Indian Point 3 nuclear power plant in Buchanan, N.Y.

Entergy Northeast operates both Indian Point 2 and 3. The NRC has two inspectors assigned to

each unit. Cox joins Senior Resident Inspector Peter Drysdale at unit 3. Peter Habighorst is the senior

resident inspector at Unit 2. Resident Inspector Lois James is also assigned to Unit 2. 

Cox joined the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in May of this year. Previously, he served in

the United States Navy’s nuclear program. He earned a bachelor’s of science degree in nuclear

engineering and engineering physics from Renssalaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) in Troy, N.Y., and is

currently pursuing a master’s of science in electric power engineering from RPI.

Cox, his wife and three children reside in Plattekill, N.Y., where they are active in the

community.

 Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They

serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections and monitoring

significant work projects. 

The Indian Point 3 resident inspectors can be reached at 914/739-8565.

###
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE REGISTRANT'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       7,441,888
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  514,064
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     17,737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,058,006
<PP&E>                                       6,825,108
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,509,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,610,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          375,526
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 26,762,065
<COMMON>                                        65,696
<OTHER-SE>                                  54,669,182
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,610,884
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,066,279
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,681,701
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,615,422)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,615,422)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,615,422)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.60)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1557-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (FEMA-1557-DR), dated September 19, 2004, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

October 19, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 19, 2004: 

Elk and Potter Counties for Individual Assistance. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs; 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 04-23912 Filed 10-25-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven Michael SAKELLARIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-50692.

D.C. No. CR-01-01811-TJW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 30, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Steven Michael Sakellaris appeals his thirty-month sentence imposed after his guilty plea conviction for threatening to interfere with flight attendants, in violation of 49 U.S.C. § 46507(2). We dismiss.

Sakellaris contends that the district court erred in calculating his sentence. The government argues that Bishop has waived his right to appeal. Based on our de novo review, *United States v. Nunez,*223 F.3d 956, 958 (9th Cir.2000), *cert. de*
      *711
      *nied,*— U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 272, 151 L.Ed.2d 199 (2001), we agree with the government.

A defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal will be enforced if the language of the waiver encompasses the ground raised on appeal, and if the waiver was knowingly and voluntarily made. *Id.*at 958. Sakellaris’s plea agreement provides that he waives the right to appeal his sentence unless the sentence imposed is “greater than the high end of the guideline range recommended by the government pursuant to the plea agreement.” Because the district court imposed a sentence below the high end of the guideline recommended by the Government and Sakellaris has not challenged the knowing and voluntary nature of his waiver, he has waived his right to appeal.1
      *See id.*at 958-959.

DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

. Sakkellaris argues in his reply brief that the waiver of his right to appeal is invalid because the appellate waiver language in the plea agreement is ambiguous. Arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are waived. *United States*v. *Patterson,*230 F.3d 1168, 1172 n. 3 (9th Cir.2000). Moreover, we find no such ambiguity.
Exhibit 2

(Total Compensation and Expenses Requested)

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 699-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2021 Page 1 of 2
Professional Firm Category Hours Fees Expenses Total Billed

Stumphauzer Foslid Sloman Ross & 

Kolaya, PLLC Attorneys 1,017.2 $313,440.00 $1,894.40 $315,334.40

Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & 

Raspanti, LLP Attorneys 2,547.8 $580,899.50 $69,080.75 $649,980.25

Development Specialists, Inc. Operations Consultant 3,239.5 $1,447,977.50 $11,102.26 $1,459,079.76

Lawgical Insight, LLC eDiscovery Specialist 90.6 $29,445.00 $5,142.55 $34,587.55

HD Investigative Group, LLC Investigations Firm 26.0 $5,850.00 $0.00 $5,850.00

Fox Rothschild Attorneys 54.8 $21,286.00 $0.00 $21,286.00

6,557.8 $2,398,898.00 $87,219.96 $2,486,117.96

Total Compensation and Expenses Requested

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 699-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2021 Page 2 of 2
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Lezer Corp., Plaintiff,

v.

Noble Partners LLC, dba Noble 

Medical Supply and Sean Grady, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 20-23235-Civ-Scola

Order Adopting Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation

This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres

for a report and recommendation on the Plaintiff’s motion to tax costs (ECF No. 

34). On February 19, 2021, Judge Torres issued a report, recommending that the 

Court grant the motion in part and deny it in part, and award the Defendant costs 

in the amount of $530. (Rep. & Recs., ECF No. 42.) No objections have been filed 

and the time to object has passed. Having considered Judge Torres’s report, the 

record, and the relevant legal authorities, the Court finds Judge Torres’s report 

and recommendation cogent and compelling.

The Court affirms and adopts Judge Torres’s report and recommendation 

(ECF No. 42) and grants in part and denies in part the Plaintiff’s motion (ECF 

No. 34). Consistent with the report, the Court awards $530 in taxable costs to 

Plaintiff Lezer Corp. to be paid, jointly and severally, by Defendants Noble Partners 

LLC, dba Noble Medical Supply and Sean Grady.

A copy of this order will be forwarded via U.S. mail to any pro se litigant 

who has not provided the Court with an email address.

Done and ordered at Miami, Florida on March 8, 2021.

_______________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-23235-RNS Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2021 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 23**
  **Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
****
****
****
Board of Directors
Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc.
Springfield, Missouri
****
****
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-47241, 333-31196, 333-65544, 333-83822 and 333-117918 on Forms S-8 of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated January 28, 2005, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and June 30, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2004, the six-month period ended December 31, 2003, and for the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2004.

**/s/BKD,LLP**
 March 30, 2005
 Springfield, Missouri
### §2181. Assignment of space for meetings of joint committees, conference committees, etc.

The President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall cause a survey to be made of available space within the Capitol which could be utilized for joint committee meetings, meetings of conference committees, and other meetings, requiring the attendance of both Senators and Members of the House of Representatives; and shall recommend the reassignment of such space to accommodate such meetings.

(Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title II, §242, 60 Stat. 839.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 174d–1 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Aug. 2, 1946, see section 245 of act Aug. 2, 1946, set out as a note under section 4301 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.1  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   I, Barry Quiroz, Acting Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Accounting Officer of Mexoro Mineral Ltd. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:  (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:  June 15, 2009  /S /Barry Quiroz _________________________________ Barry Quiroz Acting Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Accounting Officer
### §292. Royalties and rentals; disposition

For the privilege of mining or extracting the gold, silver, or quicksilver deposits in the land covered by such lease, the lessee shall pay to the United States a royalty, which shall not be less than 5 per centum nor more than 121⁄2 per centum of the net value of the output of the gold, silver, or quicksilver at the mine, due and payable at the end of each month succeeding that of the extraction of the minerals from the mine. All moneys received from royalties and rentals under the provisions of this chapter shall be deposited in the Treasury of the United States, and disposed of in the same manner as rentals and royalties under the provisions of section 191 of this title.

(June 8, 1926, ch. 503, §2, 44 Stat. 710.)
#### § 190.181 Drawback allowance.

The fourth proviso of section 3 of the Foreign Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81c), provides that merchandise transferred to a foreign trade zone for the sole purpose of exportation, storage or destruction (except destruction of distilled spirits, wines, and fermented malt liquors), will be considered to be exported for the purpose of drawback, provided there is compliance with the regulations of this subpart.