alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 10.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
fiscal year ended November 30, 2002 (the "Report") by Novamerican Steel Inc.
(the "Company"), the undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

o        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

o        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



                                             /s/ CHRISTOPHER H. PICKWOAD
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Name:  Christopher H. Pickwoad
                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer
Case 1:20-cv-23288-KMW Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/06/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:20-cv-23288-KMW Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/06/2020 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                             EXHIBIT 10.44

     EXTENSION AND FIRST AMENDMENT OF LEASE, dated as of January 13, 1994,
by and between RTC PROPERTIES, INC., a New York corporation having an office
at 1185 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 310, New York, New York 10036 ("Lessor")
and MERCER PRODUCTS CO., INC., a New York corporation having an office at
Hackensack Avenue, Building 10, Kearny, New Jersey 07032 ("Lessee").

                              WITNESSETH:

     WHEREAS, Lessor, as lessor, and Lessee, as lessee, entered into a
lease agreement dated as of December 1, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the
"Lease Agreement"), covering premises including a portion of Building 10 at
the River Terminal Facility, Kearny, New Jersey, as more particularly
described therein (the "Premises"), and

     WHEREAS, the Lease Agreement will expire on April 30, 1994; and

     WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee desire to extend the Lease Agreement for
an additional term of one year and, coincident with such extension, to
amend certain other provisions of the Lease Agreement;

     NOW, THEREFORE, Lessor and Lessee do hereby agree to the extension of
theLease Agreement and to the amendment of the Lease Agreement as follows:

          PARAGRAPH 1. Section 1.01 of the Lease Agreement is hereby
     amended by deleting the expiration date "April 30, 1994" and inserting
     in its place and stead the date "April 30, 1995".

          PARAGRAPH 2. During the one year extension, the Fixed Rent
     payable by Lessee pursuant to Section 2.01 shall remain unchanged.

          PARAGRAPH 3. Article THIRTY-FOURTH is hereby amended to provide
     that the term "Expiration Date originally provided for herein" shall
     refer to the Term as extended herein, i.e., April 30, 1995.

          PARAGRAPH 4. Unless otherwise provided expressly herein,
     initially capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings
     that they have in the Lease Agreement.

          PARAGRAPH 5. Except as modified herein, the provisions of the
     Lease Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lessor and Lessee have duly executed this Extension
and First Amendment of Lease as of the day and year first above written.


                                           RTC PROPERTIES, INC.

                                       By:
                                           -------------------------------
                                           MERCER PRODUCTS CO., INC.

                                       By: /s/ Thomas S. Keup
                                           -------------------------------
                                           Thomas S. Keup

ATTEST:

By: /s/ Phyllis P. Bartle
    -----------------------------
    Phyllis P. Bartle
    [NOTARY SEAL]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,444
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,280,668
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,283,112
<PP&E>                                      93,162,180
<DEPRECIATION>                              42,864,710
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,580,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,283,112
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,297,470
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,580,582
<SALES>                                      2,577,044
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,577,044
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  296,376
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                92,932
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,444)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,190,180
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,190,180
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,190,180
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.371
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.371


</TABLE>
§ 303.8 Requirements for State plans. ( a ) As a condition of a State receiving a Planning Investment: ( 1 ) The State must have or develop a CEDS that meets the requirements of § 303.7;
( 2 ) Any State plan developed with Planning Investment Assistance must, to the maximum extent practicable, be developed cooperatively by the State, political subdivisions of the State, and the Economic Development Districts located wholly or partially in the State; and
( 3 ) The State must submit to EDA an annual report on any State plan receiving Planning Investment Assistance.
( b ) Before awarding a Planning Investment to a State, EDA shall consider the extent to which the State will take into account local and District economic development plans.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-61608-RAR

TOMASA FORTANELI PONCE,

Plaintiff,

v.

WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP,

Defendant.

______________________________/

FINAL JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the conclusion of the trial in this matter and the

Jury Verdict entered on June 16, 2021 [ECF No. 69]. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Final Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant WalMart Stores East, LP and against Plaintiff Tomasa Fortaneli Ponce. Plaintiff shall take nothing 

from this action and Defendant shall go hence without day. The Clerk is instructed to CLOSE 

this case.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 16th day of June, 2021.

RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 0:20-cv-61608-RAR Document 71 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/16/2021 Page 1 of 1
#### § 10400.16 Aggregation of requests for fees.

When IPEC reasonably believes that a requester or a group of requesters acting in concert is attempting to divide a single request into a series of requests for the purpose of avoiding fees, IPEC may aggregate those requests and charge accordingly. IPEC may presume that multiple requests of this type made within a 30-day period have been made in order to avoid fees. For requests separated by a longer period, IPEC will aggregate them only where there is a reasonable basis for determining that aggregation is warranted in view of all the circumstances involved. Multiple requests involving unrelated matters cannot be aggregated.
Exhibit 4.1

                            CORONADO INDUSTRIES, INC.
                      16929 E. Enterprise Drive, Suite 202
                            Fountain Hills, AZ 85268


                                January 20, 2003


Coronado Employees and Consultants,

     The  Company's  Board of  Directors  has decided to make  available  to all
employees and consultants,  shares of the Company's common stock at a negotiated
price of not less than 90% of the lowest closing bid price during the week prior
to the employee's payday.

     To participate  in this program,  all you have to do is execute this letter
in the space below,  and indicate the amount of wages you wish to have allocated
to this Plan and the pay period from which your salary  will be  credited.  Your
free-trading shares will be delivered to you within a few days.


                                        Coronado Industries, Inc.


                                        By: /s/ Gary R. Smith
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Gary R. Smith, President



     --------------------------             --------------------------
     Amount of Wages                        Employee Signature


     --------------------------             --------------------------
     Pay Period From                        Name of Employee
     Which To Be Paid                       (Please Print)
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vanguard Health Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the 12 months ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Charles N. Martin, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

            (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                        of the Exchange Act; and

            (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Charles N. Martin, Jr.                      Charles N. Martin, Jr.Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerSeptember 20, 2006
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00264-CV 

ALLEN "F" CALTON APPELLANT

V.

STEVE SCHILLER, SHARON 

KELLER, TERRIE LIVINGSTON, 

ROBERT GILL, JOHN CAYCE, AND 

LOUIS STURNS

APPELLEES 

------------

FROM THE 153RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 153-270690-14

------------

ORDER

------------

Appellant is attempting to appeal from several orders in a case in which he 

named the Chief Justice of this court, in her official capacity, as a defendant. 

Accordingly, the following six justices recuse themselves from participating in this 

appeal: Chief Justice Terrie Livingston, Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot, Justice Anne 

Gardner, Justice Sue Walker, Justice Bill Meier, and Justice Lee Gabriel. Justice 

Bonnie Sudderth does not recuse herself from participating in this appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 16.2; Tex. R. Civ. P. 18b(b).
2

Because there is now an insufficient number of justices available to 

constitute a panel of the court to hear this appeal, this court requests the Chief 

Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas to transfer this appeal to another court of 

appeals for good cause for that court to file and decide this appeal. See Tex. 

Gov’t Code Ann. § 73.001 (Vernon 2013); Miles v. Ford Motor Co., 914 S.W.2d 

135, 137 (Tex. 1995).

A copy of this order shall be transmitted to appellant, the Texas Supreme 

Court, all attorneys of record, the trial court judge, the trial court clerk, and the 

court reporter.

DATED September 3, 2015.

Voluntarily Recused Justices Justice Not Voluntarily Recusing

/s/ Terrie Livingston 

TERRIE LIVINGSTON

CHIEF JUSTICE

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth 

BONNIE SUDDERTH

JUSTICE 

/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot 

LEE ANN DAUPHINOT

JUSTICE

/s/ Anne Gardner 

ANNE GARDNER

JUSTICE

/s/ Sue Walker 

SUE WALKER

JUSTICE

/s/ Bill Meier 

BILL MEIER

JUSTICE

/s/ Lee Gabriel 

LEE GABRIEL

JUSTICE
#### § 163.0 Scope.

This part sets forth the recordkeeping requirements and procedures governing the maintenance, production, inspection, and examination of records. It also sets forth the procedures governing the examination of persons in connection with any investigation, audit or other inquiry conducted for the purposes of ascertaining the correctness of any entry, for determining the liability of any person for duties, fees and taxes due or that may be due, for determining liability for fines, penalties and forfeitures, or for ensuring compliance with the laws and regulations administered or enforced by Customs. Additional provisions concerning records maintenance and examination applicable to U.S. importers, exporters, and producers under the United States-Canada Free Trade Agreement and the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Agreement Between the United States of America, the United Mexican States, and Canada (USMCA) are contained in parts 10 and 181 and 182 of this chapter, respectively.

[T.D. 98-56, 63 FR 32946, June 16, 1998, as amended by CBP Dec. 11-20, 76 FR 65960, Oct. 25, 2011; CBP Dec. 21-10, 86 FR 35582, July 6, 2021]
#### § 10400.17 Markings on released documents.

When requested records contain matters that are exempted under 5 U.S.C. 552(b), but such exempted matters can be reasonably segregated from the remainder of the records, the records shall be disclosed by IPEC with the necessary redactions. If records are disclosed in part, IPEC will mark them to show the amount and location of information redacted and the exemption(s) under which the redactions were made unless doing so would harm an interest protected by an applicable exemption.
Case 1:20-cv-23402-JEM   Document 115   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2022   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:20-cv-23402-JEM   Document 115   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2022   Page 2 of 2
#### Saul Wolf, Appellant, v. Irving Furie et al., Respondents.

In an action by a licensed real estate broker against the purchaser of a certain parcel of real property and the latter’s attorney to recover damages for their alleged conspiracy, resulting in the plaintiff’s being deprived of his right to earn a commission, judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits, at the close of *1016plaintiff’s case, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
### §6. Reduction of representation

Should any State deny or abridge the right of any of the male inhabitants thereof, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, to vote at any election named in the amendment to the Constitution, article 14, section 2, except for participation in the rebellion or other crime, the number of Representatives apportioned to such State shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall have to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

(R.S. §22.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §22 derived from act Feb. 2, 1872, ch. 11, §6, 17 Stat. 29.
§ 190.53 Restructuring of claims. ( a ) *General.* CBP may require claimants to restructure their drawback claims in such a manner as to foster administrative efficiency. In making this determination, CBP will consider the following factors: ( 1 ) The number of transactions of the claimant (imports and exports);
( 2 ) The value of the claims;
( 3 ) The frequency of claims;
( 4 ) The product or products being claimed; and
( 5 ) For 19 U.S.C. 1313(a) and 1313(b) claims, the provisions, as applicable, of the general manufacturing drawback ruling or the specific manufacturing drawback ruling.
( b ) *Exemption from restructuring; criteria.* In order to be exempt from a restructuring, a claimant must demonstrate an inability or impracticability in restructuring its claims as required by CBP and must provide a mutually acceptable alternative. Criteria used in such determination will include a demonstration by the claimant of one or more of the following: ( 1 ) Complexities caused by multiple commodities or the applicable general manufacturing drawback ruling or the specific manufacturing drawback ruling;
( 2 ) Variable and conflicting manufacturing and inventory periods (for example, financial, accounting and manufacturing records maintained are significantly different);
( 3 ) Complexities caused by multiple manufacturing locations;
( 4 ) Complexities caused by difficulty in adjusting accounting and inventory records (for example, records maintained—financial or accounting—are significantly different); and/or
( 5 ) Complexities caused by significantly different methods of operation.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-114 September 30, 2002

NRC ANNUAL NUCLEAR SAFETY RESEARCH CONFERENCE

 TO BE HELD OCTOBER 28 - 30 IN WASHINGTON, D.C. 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will hold its Nuclear Safety Research Conference

on October 28 - 30 at the Marriott Metro Center in Washington, D.C. 

The conference, which is open to public participation, will run from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on

Monday and Tuesday, and from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday. The Marriott Metro Center is

located at 775 Twelfth Street N.W., Washington, D.C., adjacent to the Metro Center subway station. 

Guest speakers and panelists will include NRC Chairman Richard A. Meserve, as well as

Commissioners Greta J. Dicus, Edward McGaffigan, Jr., Jeffrey S. Merrifield and NRC Executive

Director for Operations, William D. Travers. Also participating will be representatives from foreign

organizations, industry, government and the research community. 

The annual conference, which will feature three panel discussions, will focus on major issues of

interest to the nuclear community. Participants include researchers, regulators, and utility

representatives from the United States and more than 20 other countries. It is a leading forum for

attendees and participants to interact with NRC staff and colleagues to discuss the results and insights

obtained from the agency’s research program, as well as take a look at planned research activities. 

This year’s agenda includes technical sessions on research relating to the degradation of reactor

coolant pressure boundary materials, advanced nuclear reactors, nuclear fuels, dry cask storage and

transportation of spent nuclear fuel. It also includes sessions on the control of slightly radioactively

contaminated materials, and probabilistic risk assessment methods, analyses and operational experience. 

Those who wish to attend the conference are encouraged to review this year’s agenda in detail,

as well as register in advance, at www.bnl.gov/NSRC, or by contacting Sandra Nesmith at

www.srn@nrc.gov .

###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-03-016 March 26, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC SPECIAL INSPECTION INTO ELECTRICAL PROBLEMS AT PALISADES PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a special inspection into the circumstances

surrounding two recent electrical problems at the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant at Covert, Michigan. 

The plant, operated by Nuclear Management Company, has been shut down for refueling since March

16.

Both problems led to an Alert being declared by the utility under its emergency plan. An Alert

is the second lowest of four emergency classifications.

On Tuesday (March 25) the plant lost its connection to offsite electrical power sources. The

plant’s two emergency diesel generators started automatically to supply electricity to important plant

safety systems. The diesel generators continue to supply power while the utility investigates the cause

of the loss of offsite power and makes necessary repairs. Both diesel generators are operating,

although one is sufficient to supply power to the reactor shutdown cooling system and other safety

equipment.

The earlier Alert occurred on March 18 when a circuit breaker at the plant failed and caused a

fire that was confined to the circuit breaker. There were no injuries caused by the fire.

The NRC inspection team includes three inspectors from the Region III office in Lisle, Illinois,

assisted by the two resident inspectors assigned to the Palisades plant.

The report of the inspection will be publicly available when it is issued, about 30 days after the

close of the special inspection. The report will be posted on the NRC web site in the ADAMS

electronic reading room: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html (To locate the

report, once it is issued, enter the docket number for the Palisades plant (05000255) in the search

phrase box.)

# # # # #
©2013 DJI Innovations. All Rights Reserved. | 

PHANTOM Prop Guard Assembly Instruction V1.02

PHANTOM 桨保护器安装说明 V1.02

Please carry out the following procedures to attach the Prop Guard to the aircraft.

请按照下面步骤安装桨保护器。

1. Prepare the aircraft, Prop Guard (4 pcs), M3.0x12 Screws (8 pcs), a thread and an allen driver.

准备 PHANTOM 飞行器、桨保护器(4 个)、M3.0x12 螺丝(8 颗)、保护线、内六角螺丝刀。

2. Use the screw driver to remover the screws on the four motors (M3.0x8) of PHANTOM marked in blue in Fig.1.

使用螺丝刀卸下原 PHANTOM 四个电机上的螺丝(M3.0x8)。(如图 1 蓝色标记)

3. Fix the Screws of M3.0x12 with appropriate strength(Fig.1)to mount the four Prop Guards on the PHANTOM . 

Note that thread lock is not allowed.

按照图 1 所示,适当用力拧紧螺丝(M3.0x12),装好四个 PHANTOM 桨保护器。不可以使用螺丝胶。

4. For better protection, please attach a thread through the Prop Guard, note that the thread should be under the 

Prop Guards(Fig.2). Finish.

为了起到更好的保护作用,可按照图 2 所示,将保护线连到桨保护器上,注意穿线时线都在桨保护器底部。

安装完毕。

IMPORTANT: Here, M3.0x12 Screw is for

Prop Guard assembly. Without Prop Guard, you 

should use M3.0x8 Screw; otherwise, wrong 

type of screw will damage the motor.

注意: 此处安装桨保护器,使用型号为

M3.0x12 的螺丝;如果没有安装桨保护器,只

能使用型号为 M3.0x8 螺丝。否则,过长的螺丝

会损坏电机。

Fig.1 Prop Guard Installation Diagram /图 1 桨保护器安装示意图

Fig.2 Installation is OK/图 2 正确安装示意图

Specifications/参数 

Weight(Single)/重量(单个):18.7g

Size(Single)/单个尺寸:Angle/角度(155.0o)

Radius/半径(112.32mm)

Whole Size with Four Prop Guards /安装后最大

外形尺寸:575.5mm