alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
November 6, 1997



<EXHIBIT 4.2>



 

May 20, 2002



 

Roger M. Boissonneault

5 North Bridge Drive

Long Valley, NJ 07853



Dear Roger:



This letter is intended to clarify and amend the provisions of the May 4, 2000 agreement (the "Agreement") between yourself and Warner Chilcott, Inc.  As you are aware, you are entitled to (i) participate in a bonus plan and (ii) pursuant to Section 3(f) of the Agreement, receive an annual cash bonus ("Target Bonus") in a target amount equal to 50% of your current Base Salary (as defined in the Agreement).  Therefore, in the event that a Change in Control (as defined in the Agreement) occurs, it is the Company's intention that the compensation that you would receive pursuant to Section 4(d) of the Agreement include compensation relating to your Target Bonus.



Therefore, Section 4(d) of the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:



Delete the third sentence of Section 4(d) and replace it with the following sentence:



"Notwithstanding the foregoing, if such termination is following a Change in Control, Executive shall be entitled to receive an amount equal to his then current Base Salary for a period of eighteen (18) months payable in a lump sum plus a payment of 1.5 x Target Bonus (Target Bonus being defined as 50% of Executive's Base Salary)."



Please confirm your acceptance of the terms of this letter by signing and returning a copy of this letter.



 

Warner Chilcott, Inc.



 

By:_______________________

Name:Anthony Bruno

Title:Vice President and Secretary



 

 

Accepted and agreed to this 20th day of May, 2002.





Executive



 

By:_______________________

Name:Roger M. Boissonneault



 

The contract of service with Mr. Boissonneault further provides that should the contract be terminated pursuant to a change of control (as defined in the contract) the severance payment due to Mr. Boissonneault will be equal to his base salary, target bonus and benefits for a period of eighteen months.
§ 177.4 Oral discussion of issues. ( a ) *Generally.* A person submitting a request for a ruling and desiring an opportunity to orally discuss the issue or issues involved should indicate that desire in writing at the time the ruling request is filed. Such a discussion will only be scheduled when, in the opinion of the Customs personnel by whom the ruling request is under consideration, a conference will be helpful in deciding the issue or issues involved or when a determination or conclusion contrary to that advocated in the ruling request is contemplated. Conferences are scheduled for the purpose of affording the parties an opportunity to freely and openly discuss the matters set forth in the ruling request. Accordingly, the parties will not be bound by any argument or position advocated or agreed to, expressly or by implication, during the conference unless either party subsequently agrees to be so bound in writing. The conference will not conclude with the issuance of a ruling letter.
( b ) *Time, place, and number of conferences.* If a request for a conference is granted, the person making the request will be notified of the time and place of the conference. No more than one conference with respect to the matters set forth in a ruling request will be scheduled, unless, in the opinion of the Customs personnel by whom the ruling request is under consideration, additional conferences are necessary.
( c ) *Representation.* A person whose request for a conference has been granted may be accompanied at that conference by counsel or other representatives, or may designate such persons to attend the conference in his place.
( d ) *Additional information presented at conferences.* It will be the responsibility of the person submitting the request for a ruling to provide for inclusion in the Customs Service file in the matter a written record setting forth any and all additional information, documents, and exhibits introduced during the conference to the extent that person considers such material relevant to the consideration of the ruling request.
[T.D. 75-186, 40 FR 31929, July 30, 1975, as amended by T.D. 80-285, 45 FR 80105, Dec. 3, 1980; T.D. 84-149, 49 FR 28699, July 16, 1984; T.D. 89-74, 54 FR 31515, July 31, 1989]
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. III-00-47 August 25, 2000

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO MEET SEPT. 6 WITH UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI

ON POSSIBLE VIOLATIONS AT REACTOR FACILITY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet September 6 in Columbia, Missouri, with

representatives of the University of Missouri for a predecisional enforcement conference to discuss

possible safety violations at the university’s non-power research reactor.

The meeting will be at 2 p.m. at the Holiday Inn Select, Executive Center, 2200 I-70 Dr., SW.

The meeting is open to public observation. NRC staff members will be available at the close of the

meeting for comments and questions from members of the public.

The possible violations were associated with incidents at the reactor facility occurring on April

12 and June 12. Both incidents involved a reduction in safety margins at the reactor facility, but did

not result in any radiation overexposures or releases of radioactivity.

Prior to the April 12 incident, workers at the reactor facility removed shielding blocks from a

portion of the reactor pool to inspect the pool liner. Then, during refueling operations on April 12,

operators placed a fuel element in a storage location adjacent to the area where the shielding blocks

had been removed. This created a high radiation area nearby, and a radiation alarm sounded.

The fuel element was subsequently returned to its original position, eliminating the high

radiation level. No workers were in the area where the high radiation levels occurred.

The June 12 incident occurred while the reactor was shut down for maintenance. Reactor

operators removed a control blade from the reactor without first removing two of the eight fuel

elements in the reactor, as required by procedures. There are four control blades, which control the

power level of the reactor. One blade is removed every six months for replacement.

The procedural requirement to remove two fuel elements from the reactor is to provide

additional safety margin to prevent an unexpected startup of the reactor. No such startup occurred in

the June 12 incident, and there were no safety consequences.

The decision to hold a predecisonal enforcement conference does not mean that a determination

has been made that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. The purpose is to

discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance, to provide the licensee with an
opportunity to point out errors that may have been made in NRC inspection reports and to enable the

company to outline its proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action, such as a civil

penalty, will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a later time.

#####
§ 145.4 Dutiable merchandise without declaration or invoice, prohibited merchandise, and merchandise imported contrary to law. ( a ) *Subject to seizure and forfeiture.* When, upon CBP examination, a mail article is found to contain merchandise subject to duty or tax, and the mail article is not accompanied by an appropriate customs declaration and invoice or statement of value required by § 145.11, or is found to contain material prohibited importation or imported contrary to law, the merchandise is subject to seizure and forfeiture.
( b ) *Mitigation of forfeiture.* Any claimant incurring a forfeiture of merchandise for violation of this section may file a petition for relief pursuant to part 171 of this chapter. Mitigation of that forfeiture may occur consistent with mitigation guidelines.
( c ) *Collection of mitigated forfeiture.* When the shipment does not exceed $2,500 in value, CBP Form 3419 or 3419A or CBP Form 368 or 368A (serially numbered) or CBP Form 7501, or its electronic equivalent, must be used for the entry of the merchandise, and the duty, any tax, and the amount of the mitigated forfeiture must be entered as separate items thereon. If a mail article for which a mail fine entry has been issued in accordance with this paragraph is undeliverable, it will be returned to the director of the port where the entry was issued, for disposition in accordance with § 145.59 relating to articles subject to seizure.
( d ) *Petition for relief.* The addressee or sender may file a petition with the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer having jurisdiction over the port where the mail fine entry was issued in accordance with part 171 of this chapter for relief from the forfeiture incurred and for release of the seized merchandise, or for additional relief from a mitigated forfeiture.
[T.D. 73-135, 38 FR 13369, May 21, 1973] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 145.4, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
§ 191.38 Records. ( a ) *Maintained by claimant; by others.* Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1508(c)(3), all records which are necessary to be maintained by the claimant under this part with respect to drawback claims, and records kept by others to complement the records of the claimant, which are essential to establish compliance with the legal requirements of 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) or (j)(2), as applicable, and this part with respect to drawback claims, shall be retained for 3 years after payment of such claims (under 19 U.S.C. 1508, the same records may be subject to a different retention period for different purposes).
( b ) *Accounting for the merchandise.* Merchandise subject to drawback under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) and (j)(2) shall be accounted for in a manner which will enable the claimant: ( 1 ) To determine, and Customs to verify, the applicable import entry or certificate of delivery;
( 2 ) To determine, and Customs to verify, the applicable exportation or destruction; and
( 3 ) To identify with respect to the import entry or certificate of delivery, the imported duty-paid merchandise.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 01560

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 01560\01560_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

01560\01560_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

01560\01560_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 01560\01560_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01560\01560_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01560\01560_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

01560\Certification Statement_01560.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01560\Supporting Documentation\01560_A5-2 Aerial Map- Plant ID No. 1560_CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01560\Supporting Documentation\01560_A5-3 Water Balance Plant ID No.1560_CBI.pdfPlant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01560\Supporting Documentation\01560_EPA Letter Request_EPA Plant ID No 1560.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Editorial Note on Part 142
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 142.3a Entry numbers. ( a ) *Placement on CBP forms.* The importer or broker shall place an 11 character entry number on the entry and corresponding entry summary documentation. For documentation prepared on data processing equipment, the number shall be printed directly on the form. For manually prepared documentation, the number shall be pre-printed in a machine readable format specified by CBP. The same number shall not be used for more than one entry transaction.
( b ) *Format.* The following format, including hyphens, must be used when showing the entry number: XXX-NNNNNNN-N XXX represents an entry filer code assigned by CBP, NNNNNNN is a unique number which is assigned by the broker or importer, and N is a check digit computed from the first 10 characters based on a formula provided by CBP.
( 1 ) *Assignment of entry filer code.* CBP will assign a unique 3 character (alphabetic, numeric, or alpha numeric) entry filer code to all licensed brokers filing CBP entries. CBP will assign an entry filer code to certain importers filing CBP entries based on importer entry volume, frequency of entry filing, and other considerations. The broker or importer shall use this assigned code as the beginning three characters of the number for all CBP entries, regardless of where the entries are filed.
( 2 ) *Entry filer assigned number.* For each entry, the broker or importer shall assign a unique 7 digit number. This number shall not be assigned to more than one transaction.
( 3 ) *Check digit.* The broker or importer is responsible for ensuring that the check digit is computed by data processing equipment.
( c ) *Pulication of entry filer codes.* CBP shall make available electronically a listing of filer codes and the importers, consignees, and customs brokers assigned those filer codes. The listing will be updated periodically.
( d ) *Misuse of the entry filer code.* The Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade, or his designee may refuse to allow use of an assigned entry filer code if it is misused by the importer or broker.
( e ) *Alternative procedure.* If an importer does not have an assigned entry filer code, or if the Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade, or his designee, in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section refuses to allow use of an assigned entry filer code, the importer or broker shall obtain forms with a CBP assigned pre-printed machine readable entry number with a computed check digit. These forms will be available for sale by CBP and must be obtained and used before the merchandise may be released from CBP custody.
[T.D. 86-106, 51 FR 19167, May 28, 1986, as amended by T.D. 98-25, 63 FR 12996, Mar. 17, 1998]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-02-005 February 20, 2002

CONTACT: Breck Henderson e-mail: e-mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128 Cellular: 817-917-1227

NRC TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS

AT HIGH MOUNTAIN INSPECTION SERVICES, INC.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a predecisional enforcement conference

Wednesday, February 27, with officials of High Mountain Inspection Services, Inc., of Casper,

Wyomng, to discuss several apparent violations of NRC requirements.

The conference will begin at 2 p.m. (MST) at the Radisson Hotel, 300 North Poplar St., Casper. 

The meeting will be open to public observation; NRC officials will be available afterward for

questions.

The violations involve the apparent failure of High Mountain to properly manage and limit

radiation doses to its employees. These problems were reviewed by NRC inspectors during an

inspection completed on October 2 last year.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that NRC has made

a final determination that violations did occur or that enforcement action, such as a monetary fine, will

be taken. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the apparent violations, their causes and safety

significance. The meeting will also provide High Mountain officials with an opportunity to point out

any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report and to present its corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action will be made at

this conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials at a later time.

###
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 Statement Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings I, M. Peter Thomas, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Superconductor
Technologies Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 10, 2004 /s/ M. Peter ThomasM. Peter ThomasPresident and Chief Executive Officer 36
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1410 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1410

 To amend chapter 81 of title 5, United States Code, to authorize the 
  use of clinical social workers to conduct evaluations to determine 
              work-related emotional and mental illnesses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 20, 2003

  Mr. Towns introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend chapter 81 of title 5, United States Code, to authorize the 
  use of clinical social workers to conduct evaluations to determine 
              work-related emotional and mental illnesses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXAMINATION BY CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKERS FOR FEDERAL WORKER 
              COMPENSATION CLAIMS.

    Section 8101 of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and osteopathic 
        practitioners'' and inserting ``osteopathic practitioner, and 
        clinical social workers''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking ``osteopathic 
        practitioners'' and inserting ``osteopathic practitioners, 
        clinical social workers,''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 191.171 General; drawback allowance. ( a ) *General.* Section 313(p) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(p)), provides for drawback on the basis of qualified articles which consist of either petroleum derivatives that are imported, duty-paid, and qualified for drawback under the unused merchandise drawback law (19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1)), or petroleum derivatives that are manufactured or produced in the United States, and qualified for drawback under the manufacturing drawback law (19 U.S.C. 1313(a) or (b)).
( b ) *Allowance of drawback.* Drawback may be granted under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p): ( 1 ) In cases where there is no manufacture, upon exportation of the imported article, an article of the same kind and quality, or any combination thereof; or
( 2 ) In cases where there is a manufacture or production, upon exportation of the manufactured or produced article, an article of the same kind and quality, or any combination thereof.
( c ) *Merchandise processing fees.* In cases where the requirements of paragraph (b)(1) of this section have been met, merchandise processing fees will be eligible for drawback.
( d ) *Federal excise tax.* For purposes of drawback of internal revenue tax imposed under Chapters 32 and 38 (with the exception of Subchapter A of Chapter 38) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (IRC), drawback granted on the export of substituted merchandise will be limited to the amount of taxes paid (and not returned by refund, credit, or drawback) on the substituted merchandise.
[T.D. 98-16, 63 FR 11006, Mar. 5, 1998, as amended by T.D. 02-16, 67 FR 16637, Apr. 8, 2002; CBP Dec. 04-33, 69 FR 60083, Oct. 7, 2004; USCBP-2018-0029, 83 FR 65067, Dec. 18, 2018]