alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2801. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–128, title V, §511(a), July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1705

Section, Pub. L. 105–220, title I, §101, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 939; Pub. L. 105–244, title I, §102(d)(1), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1622; Pub. L. 105–332, §3(f), Oct. 31, 1998, 112 Stat. 3126; Pub. L. 106–400, §2, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1675; Pub. L. 107–110, title X, §1076(w), Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 2093; Pub. L. 109–270, §2(h)(1), (2), Aug. 12, 2006, 120 Stat. 747; Pub. L. 110–234, title IV, §4002(b)(1)(B), (E), (2)(R), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1096, 1097; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title IV, §4002(b)(1)(B), (E), (2)(R), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1857, 1858, defined terms. See section 3102 of this title.

Provisions similar to those formerly contained in this section were contained in section 1503 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–220.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3101 of this title.

#### Short Title of 2007 Amendment

Pub. L. 110–140, title X, §1001, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1748, provided that: "This title [amending section 2916 of this title] may be cited as the 'Green Jobs Act of 2007'."

#### Short Title of 2006 Amendment

Pub. L. 109–281, §1, Sept. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 1173, provided that: "This Act [enacting section 2918a of this title, amending section 2939 of this title, section 1701u of Title 12, Banks and Banking, section 4183 of Title 25, Indians, and section 12870 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, repealing sections 12899 to 12899i of Title 42, and enacting provisions set out as notes under section 2918a of this title and section 1701u of Title 12] may be cited as the 'YouthBuild Transfer Act'."
###### Editorial Note on Part 351

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 351

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 89 FR 20832, Mar. 25, 2024.

#### § 351.604 Access to information.

Subpart C of this part applies to factual information submitted in connection with this subpart.
p060702.eng.sanitized INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 06-0702 Focus Ready Draft 8/24/2006 ENGINEER: ARNOLD \ DTN PV (kg/yr):
SUBMITTER: USE: OTHER USES: MSDS: Label: No

CRSS (08/17/2006): Chemical Name: S-H20: 0.0032 g/L @ VP: 8.9E-4 torr @ MW: 284.53 %<500 %<1000 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:
Consumer Use: No SAT (concerns) (08/18/2006): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P1B3T2 . Health: 2-3 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation, Ingestion, XB Testing (Testing desired) Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC =2ppb), XB Testing (Testing desired) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3C NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: None.
EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 1) # of workers exposed: >1000? 2) >100 workers with >10 mg/day inhalation exposure: 3) (a) >100 workers w/1-10 mg/day inh. exp. & >100 days/yr: (b) Routine Dermal Cont: >250 workers & >100 days/yr: INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 06-0702 Number of Sites/ Location:p060702.eng.sanitized Days/yr: Basis: Process Description: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis: . Inhalation:

Dermal:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 06-0702 Number of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis: Process Description: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis: Inhalation:

Dermal:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 06-0702p060702.eng.sanitized Number of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis: Process Description: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis: Inhalation:
Dermal:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No PMN: 06-0702 Number of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis: Process Description: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis: Inhalation:

Dermal:
[Baird, Kurtz & Dobson letterhead]


                        Consent of Independent Accountants

Board of Directors
Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc.
Springfield, Missouri

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement No.
333-47241 on Form S-8 of Guaranty Federal  Bancshares,  Inc. of our report dated
July 23, 1999,  relating to the consolidated  balance sheets of Guaranty Federal
Bancshares,  Inc.  as of June 30, 1999 and 1998,  and the  related  consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended June 30, 1999,  which report  appears in the
June 30, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc.


                             /s/ Baird, Kurtz & Dobson
                             ----------------------------------


September 28, 1999
Springfield, Missouri
* Pursuant t o 5th C I R

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40341 Summary Calendar

SERGIO HIRAM ALVIDREZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH W. WILLIAMS, Assistant Warden; CHARLES BELL; ERNEST H. GUTERREZ, JR.; STEVE SANGSTER; EMIL C. GARZA; BRUCE V. PETERSON; MICHAEL BAILEY

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(V-96-CV-8)

December 16, 1998

Before JOHNSON, DUHE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Sergio Hiram Alvidrez, Texas prisoner no. 512255, appeals the

district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims as

frivolous. After reviewing the record and Alvidrez’s arguments on

appeal, we AFFIRM for the reasons given by the district court. S ee

Alvidrez v. Williams , G-96-CV-008 (S.D. Tex., Feb. 26, 1998).2
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Todd Tkachuk, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
of Peabodys Coffee,  Inc. (the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) the Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB of the  Company for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 14, 2004

/s/ Todd Tkachuk
------------------------------------------------------------
Todd Tkachuk
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 11.01

                       BUILDING ONE SERVICES CORPORATION
                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
               (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                                       Twelve Months Ended December 31,
                                                                    1998            1997             1996
                                                                -------------   -------------   -------------
<S>                                                             <C>             <C>             <C>
Basic earnings per share:
   Net income................................................    $    47,463     $     1,443     $       415
   Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic...............     39,908,364       5,683,464       1,290,724
                                                                 -----------     -----------     -----------
   Net income per share - Basic..............................    $      1.19     $      0.25     $      0.32
                                                                 ===========     ===========     ===========
Diluted earnings per share:                                                                                 
   Net income................................................    $    47,463     $     1,443     $       415
                                                                 -----------     -----------     -----------
   Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic...............     39,908,364       5,683,464       1,290,724
   Convertible Non-Voting Common Stock.......................        373,973          49,315                
   Common stock equivalents from stock options and warrants..        342,903         132,771         115,724
   Contingently issuable shares..............................        303,312                                
                                                                 -----------     -----------     -----------
   Total weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted.......     40,928,452       5,865,550       1,405,840
                                                                 -----------     -----------     -----------
   Net income per share - Diluted............................    $      1.16     $      0.25     $      0.30
                                                                 ===========     ===========     ===========
</TABLE> 

Outstanding stock options and warrants to purchase 1,945,439 shares of common
stock as of December 31, 1998 were not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share because the options' exercise prices were greater than the
average market price of the common shares during the period.
#### § 132.22 When quota is filled.

Any packages containing merchandise subject to an absolute quota which is filled shall be returned to the postmaster for return to the sender immediately as undeliverable mail. The addressee will be notified on Customs Form 3509 or in any other appropriate manner that entry has been denied because the quota is filled.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin E. Franklin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Martin E. Franklin 
|Martin E. Franklin     
|Chief Executive Officer
|July 28, 2006          

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ian G.H. Ashken, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Ian G.H. Ashken    
|Ian G.H. Ashken        
|Chief Financial Officer
|July 28, 2006
#### § 200.735-118 Interests of employees' relatives.

The interest of a spouse, minor child or other member of an employee's immediate household is considered to be an interest of the employee. For the purpose of this section, *member of an employee's immediate household* means those blood relations who are residents of the employee's household.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-02-035 June 14, 2002

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH ST. LOUIS V.A. MEDICAL CENTER

TO DISCUSS IMPROPER DISPOSAL OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet on June 18 in Lisle, Illinois, with officials

of the Veterans Health Administration to discuss possible violations of NRC requirements in two

instances in which the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in St. Louis improperly disposed of radioactive

material.

The meeting, called a Predecisional Enforcement Conference, will be held at 1 p.m. CDT in

the Third Floor Conference Room of the NRC’s Region III Office, 801 Warrenville Road, Lisle.

Visitors should register with the receptionist in Suite 255. The public is invited to observe the business

portion of the meeting and will have an opportunity to ask questions of the NRC staff before the

meeting is adjourned.

On two occasions, March 14 and March 28, radioactive material was detected among trash

received at a landfill disposal site in Roxana, Illinois. The Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety

responded to the site, and found radioactive material which had originated with the V. A. Medical

Center in St. Louis.

In one instance, a vial contained a small amount of radioactive material from the medical

center’s nuclear medicine department, and, in the second instance, glassware from a research

laboratory had low levels of radioactive contamination. 

The meeting will cover possible violations involved with the disposal of the radioactively

contaminated material, and the medical center’s failure to report to the NRC the loss of the

contaminated glassware, which was required because of the amount of radioactive material involved.

Because of the type and quantities of radioactive material involved, no landfill worker or

member of the public would have received a significant radiation exposure.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that a

determination has been made that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken.

The purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance, to provide the

company with an opportunity to provide additional information on the situation, and to enable the

company to outline its proposed corrective action.
No decision on the apparent violation or any contemplated enforcement action, such as a fine,

will be made at the conference. Those will be made by NRC officials at a later time.

# # # # #
|  |
|--|

|  |  |
|--|--|

| ** ** |
|------------|

|   | ****Will Rogers**** 
7 pages

Will Rogers was not the subject of an FBI investigation; however, his name is briefly mentioned in two miscellaneous files.

**Part 01**

Introduction
Reading Room Index - A   B   C   D   E    F   G- H   I    J    K   L   M   N   -O   P   Q   R   S   T   U-V   W   X   Y   Z   
Electronic Reading Room
- Alphabetical Listing- Espionage-Famous Persons-Gangster Era- Historical Interest- Unusual Phenomena-Violent CrimeFBI              File Fact Sheet FOIA Request Instructions- FOIA Request Form - Privacy Waiver and Certificate of Identity Form Privacy Act Instructions- Privacy Act Request FormDOJ              Reference GuideU.S.              DOJ FOIASearch
All of these publications are in PDF (Portable Document Format). To view them you will need to have the Adobe Acrobat Reader plug-in installed on your computer. The Reader can be downloaded at no cost from Adobe's site on the World Wide Web.   If you have difficulty accessing any material on this site because of a disability, please contact us in writing or via telephone and we will work with you to make the information available.

Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Section    202-324-5520 |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 1201.203 Proceedings for attorney fees. ( a ) *Form and content of request.* A request for attorney fees must be made by motion, must state why the appellant or respondent believes he or she is entitled to an award under the applicable statutory standard, and must be supported by evidence substantiating the amount of the request. Evidence supporting a motion for attorney fees must include at a minimum: ( 1 ) Accurate and current time records;
( 2 ) A copy of the terms of the fee agreement (if any);
( 3 ) A statement of the attorney's customary billing rate for similar work, with evidence that that rate is consistent with the prevailing community rate for similar services in the community in which the attorney ordinarily practices; and
( 4 ) An established attorney-client relationship.
( b ) *Addendum proceeding.* A request for attorney fees will be decided in an addendum proceeding.
( c ) *Place of filing.* Where the initial decision in the proceeding on the merits was issued by a judge in a MSPB regional or field office, a motion for attorney fees must be filed with the regional or field office that issued the initial decision. Where the decision in the proceeding on the merits was an initial decision issued by a judge at the Board's headquarters or where the only decision was a final decision issued by the Board, a motion for attorney fees must be filed with the Clerk of the Board.
( d ) *Time of filing.* A motion for attorney fees must be filed as soon as possible after a final decision of the Board but no later than 60 days after the date on which a decision becomes final.
( e ) *Service.* A copy of a motion for attorney fees must be served on the other parties or their representatives at the time of filing. A party may file a pleading responding to the motion within the time limit established by the judge.
( f ) *Hearing; applicability of subpart B.* The judge may hold a hearing on a motion for attorney fees and may apply appropriate provisions of subpart B of this part to the addendum proceeding.
( g ) *Initial decision; review by the Board.* The judge will issue an initial decision in the addendum proceeding, which shall be subject to the provisions for a petition for review by the Board under subpart C of this part.
[63 FR 41179, Aug. 3, 1998, as amended at 65 FR 24381, Apr. 26, 2000]
#### Gladstone Clarke, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. Forty-second Street, Manhattanville and St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingrar ham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.; McLaughlin and Laughlin, JJ., dissented.
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Eyeris Rodriguez and others, 

Plaintiff,

v.

Supersonic of Florida, Inc. and 

others, Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 20-23459-Civ-Scola

Order Adopting the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendations

This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Edwin G. 

Torres for a report and recommendation on the Plaintiffs’ motion to divest Juan 

Gonzalez of all rights, title, and interest in Supersonic of Florida, Inc. and to 

compel discovery in aid of execution. (ECF No. 40.) On April 27, 2021, Judge

Torres issued a report, recommending that the Court grant the motion. (Report 

& Recommendations, ECF No. 42.) No objections have been filed and the time 

to do so has passed. Having considered Judge Torres’s report, the record, and 

the relevant legal authorities, the Court finds Judge Torres’s report and 

recommendation cogent and compelling.

The Court affirms and adopts Judge Torres’s report and 

recommendation (ECF No. 42) and grants the Plaintiffs’ motion (ECF No. 40).

Done and ordered at Miami, Florida, on May 12, 2021.

_______________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-23459-RNS Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/13/2021 Page 1 of 1