alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-23 June 7, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING

TO DISCUSS RANCHO SECO DECOMMISSIONING

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with the public on Tuesday, June 20,

to discuss recently changed plans for the dismantlement and decontamination of Rancho Seco, a

shutdown nuclear power plant owned by the Sacramento Municipal Utility District.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. in the Chabolla Community Center, 630 Chabolla Ave., Galt,

California. Doors will open at 6:30 p.m. The NRC and SMUD will make short presentations on

dismantlement plans and how the NRC will inspect and regulate the work, followed by an opportunity

for members of the public to make comments and ask questions.

On November 4 last year SMUD provided a second amendment to its original

decommissioning plans in which the company has elected to forego its initial plan to maintain the plant

in a long-term safe storage condition and begin full decontamination and dismantlement. The work is

now scheduled to be completed by 2008. Because this is a significant change in the original plans the

NRC is holding this meeting to explain the changes to the public.

###
### LEGEND



### DAY (X)= DAY YOU DETERMINE THAT LEAK RATE CANNOT BE BROUGHT BELOW

TRIGGER RATE WITHIN 30 DAYS DAY (Y) = DAY NORMAL OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OR

CONDITIONS ACHIEVED AFTER 2nd REPAIR ATTEMPT DAY (Z)= DAY 2nd REPAIR ATTEMPT COMPLETED DAY (W) = DAY YOU DISCOVER THE NEED TO CHANGE THE TIME LINE DAY (V)= DAY 1ST REPAIR COMPLETED L/R = LEAK REPAIR T/R = TRIGGER RATE S/D = SHUTDOWN

Day 0 LEAK DISCOVERED ABOVE TRIGGER RATE Day (X) DET. L/R CANNOT BE RED.<T/R IN 30 DAYS NECESSARY CRITICAL PARTS NOT AVAIL. SCHEDULE REPAIRS TO BE COMPLETED BY DAY (V) COMPLETE REPAIR - 1st ATTEMPT BY DAY (V) DAY (V) COMPLETE & DOCUMENT INITIAL VERIFICATION TEST DAY (Y) NORMAL OPERATION CONDITIONS ACHIEVED (Y) + 30 Days COMPLETE FOLLOW-UP VERIFIC. TEST

Day (W) DISCOVERY TIME LINE CHANGES DAY (W) + 30
NOTIFY EPA 30 days LOCAL STATE FED REGULS. REPAIRS IMPOSS DAY (X) PLUS 30 days NOTIFY EPA IF MORE TIME IS REQUIRED

30 Days COMPLETE REPAIRS - 1st. ATTEMPT WITHIN 30 DAYS COMPLETE VERIFICATION TESTING 120 Days COMPLETE PROCESS SHUTDOWN CORRECT

LEAK Box #1 Box #2

Box #3

Box #4 Box #5

Box #6

Box #7 Box #8 Box #9

Box #10 Box #11 Box #12 Box #13 Box #14 Box #15

# * Box #17 has three options (see Module F) * Box #17 and Box #35 reference the retrofit/retirement section and timeline (see Module F) (Optional) NOTIFY EPA VERIF. TEST RESULTS 120 Days 2ND REPAIR - PROCESS S/D REQUIRED COMPLETE REPAIR 2nd. ATTEMPT Day (Z) COMPLETE 2ND INITIAL VERIF. TEST 30 Days NOTIFY EPA 2nd. VERIFICATION TEST SUCCESSFUL CANCEL RETROFIT OR RETIREMENT SYS. OPER. BELOW TRIGGER RATE EXECUTE RETROFIT/ RETIRE TIMELINE*

NORMAL OPERATION CONDITIONS ACHIEVED (Z) + 30 Days CONDUCT 2nd FOLLOW-UP VERIF. TEST 

### (MUST)30 Days DEVELOP RETROFIT RETIRE. PLAN

VERIFICATION TEST FAILED*

(Optional) SEEK EPA APPROVAL OF PARAMETERS 120 Days EPA APPROVES PARAMETERS 180 Days DETERMINE LEAK RATE IS BELOW TRIGGER RATE 30 Days NOTIFY EPA LEAK RATE BELOW TRIGGER RATE 30 Days NOTIFY EPA OF SUCCESSFUL VERIFICATION

(Z) +30 Days NOTIFY EPA RESULTS 2ND VER. TEST 30 Days NOTIFY EPA 2nd. VERIFICATION TEST UNSUCCESSFUL 30 Days NOTIFY EPA OF 2ND REPAIR ATTEMPT

PASS VERIFICATION TEST Box #16

Box #17

Box #19 Box #20

Box #21

Box #22 Box #23

Box #24

Box #25 Box #26

Box #27 Box #28

Box #29 Box #30

Box #31 Box #32 Box #33

Box #34 Box #35

Box #36 Box #37



# E - 7

# * Box #17 has three options (see Module F) * Box #17 and Box #35 reference the retrofit/retirement section and timeline (see Module F) 

# Regulatory Timeline For Leak Repair
#### § 125.13 Cartage of merchandise withdrawn from general order for regular entry.

When merchandise withdrawn from general order for regular entry is to be conveyed to a place designated by the port director for examination, the cartage shall be at the expense of the importer and shall be under the cartage arangements established at the port for hauling examination packages under the provisions of § 125.11(a) and (b). Reimbursement of the cost of the cartage shall be collected from the importer prior to release of the merchandise from Customs custody.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin E. Franklin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Martin E. Franklin 
|Martin E. Franklin     
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 9, 2006            

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ian G.H. Ashken, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Ian G.H. Ashken    
|Ian G.H. Ashken        
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 9, 2006
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-109 July 10, 2000

NRC APPROVES TRANSFER OF OPERATING LICENSE FOR VERMONT YANKEE

TO AMERGEN VERMONT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved the transfer of Vermont Yankee Nuclear

Power Station’s operating license to AmerGen Vermont, LLC.

The license had been held by the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation, which operated

the plant, located about five miles south of Brattleboro, Vt.

AmerGen Vermont is a Vermont limited liability company established by AmerGen

Energy Company, LLC (AmerGen), to own and operate Vermont Yankee. AmerGen

Vermont is a wholly owned subsidiary of AmerGen, a Delaware limited liability company

formed to acquire and operate nuclear power plants in the United States. PECO Energy

Company (PECO) and British Energy, Inc., (BE, Inc.), each own a 50-percent interest in

AmerGen.

On January 6, AmerGen Vermont and Vermont Yankee submitted an application to the NRC

requesting approval for the license transfer. The key issues considered by the NRC technical staff

included foreign ownership, decommissioning funding, insurance and AmerGen Vermont’s technical

and financial qualifications.

Notice of the requests for approval and for an opportunity for a hearing was published

in the Federal Register on February 3. The Commission received two requests for hearing.

One hearing request was from the State of Vermont Department of Public Service, dated

February 23. A second hearing request was filed by the Citizens Awareness Network, dated

February 22. Commission review of these hearing requests is pending.

The technical staff’s approval becomes effective immediately. However, the petitioners could

request the Commission issue a stay preventing the license transfer from proceeding, or, if the

Commission decides to grant a hearing and rules in favor of the petitioners, the Commission could

rescind the license transfer.
This license transfer review is similar to others conducted by the NRC in conjunction with the

acquisition by AmerGen of Three Mile Island Unit 1, in Pennsylvania, the Clinton nuclear power

station in Illinois and the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station in New Jersey.

#
<Page>

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective
Amendment No. 12 to the registration statement on Form N-4 (No. 33-71688) of our
report dated February 15, 2002, relating to the financial statements of First
Fortis Life Insurance Company, which appears in the Statement of Additional
Information constituting part of Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to such
registration statement. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our
report dated April 6, 2001, relating to the financial statements of First Fortis
Life Insurance Company Separate Account A, which appears in such Statement of
Additional Information. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Independent Public Accountants" in such Statement of Additional Information.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 27, 2002
Editorial Note on Part 142
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 142.48 Release procedure. ( a ) *General.* When the Customs officer at the Line Release site determines that a shipment is ready for release, release data, consisting of the entry number, the date and time of release, the inspector's badge number, the quantity and unit of measure, and the C-4 Code will be printed on the invoice and the manifest document and, when other agency documentation is presented, may be printed on that documentation. The invoice shall be returned to the entry filer and the manifest document shall be retained by Customs.
( b ) *Notification to non-ABI participants.* The returned invoice with the release data shall be the release notification to non-ABI participants.
( c ) *Notification to ABI participants.* If the Line Release entry filer is an operational ABI participant, the filer shall receive an electronic notification of the release consisting of the importer of record number, the port of entry, the filer code, the entry number, the date and time of release, the manufacturer code, the quantity and unit of measure, the release site, the HTSUS number(s), the C-4 Code and the country or countries of origin.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JULY 2, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JULY 2, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-02-1999
<CASH>                                          25,201
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,363
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,681)
<INVENTORY>                                        981
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,568
<PP&E>                                          15,583
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,705)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,883,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,676
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         55
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,177,203
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,883,540
<SALES>                                        343,473
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               343,473
<CGS>                                           52,748
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,748
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               102,849
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 202
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,580,910
<INCOME-TAX>                                   641,920
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            938,990
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   938,990
<EPS-BASIC>                                   1,703.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    14.89


</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00005-CV

Walkabout Air, Inc.; Southaire, Inc.; and Edward A. Brunner, Appellants

v.

Blake Byram d/b/a Byram Aviation, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY,

NO. 279694, HONORABLE ORLINDA NARANJO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal advising that they have

settled their dispute. We dismiss the appeal on the joint motion.

 

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Dismissed on Joint Motion

Filed: February 28, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 04-39]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/OPS-ADMIN, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 04-39 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: October 4, 2004.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 60378)          ( print page 60379)          ( print page 60380)          ( print page 60381)          ( print page 60382)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 04-22691 Filed 10-7-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
§ 210.79 Advisory opinions. ( a ) *Advisory opinions.* Upon request of any person, the Commission may, upon such investigation as it deems necessary, issue an advisory opinion as to whether any person's proposed course of action or conduct would violate a Commission exclusion order, cease and desist order, or consent order. Any responses to a request for an advisory opinion shall be filed within 10 days of service of the request. The Commission will consider whether the issuance of such an advisory opinion would facilitate the enforcement of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, would be in the public interest, and would benefit consumers and competitive conditions in the United States, and whether the person has a compelling business need for the advice and has framed his request as fully and accurately as possible. Advisory opinion proceedings are not subject to sections 554, 555, 556, 557, and 702 of title 5 of the United States Code. ( 1 ) The determination of whether to issue and advisory opinion shall be made within 30 days after the petition is filed, unless— ( i ) Exceptional circumstances preclude adherence to a 30-day deadline;
( ii ) The requester asks the Commission to postpone the determination on whether to institute an advisory proceeding; or
( iii ) The petitioner withdraws the request.
( 2 ) If exceptional circumstances preclude Commission adherence to the 30-day deadline for determining whether to institute an advisory proceeding on the basis of the request, the determination will be made as soon after that deadline as possible.
( 3 ) If the requester desires that the Commission postpone making a determination on whether to institute an advisory proceeding in response to its request, the requester must file a written request with the Secretary. If the request is granted, the determination will be rescheduled for whatever date is appropriate in light of the facts.
( 4 ) The requester may withdraw the request as a matter of right at any time before the Commission votes on whether to institute an advisory proceeding. To effect such withdrawal, the requester must file a written notice with the Commission.
( 5 ) The Commission shall institute an advisory proceeding by publication of a notice in the Federal Register. The notice will define the scope of the advisory opinion and may be amended by leave of the Commission.
( b ) *Revocation.* The Commission may at any time reconsider any advice given under this section and, where the public interest requires, revoke its prior advice. In such event the person will be given notice of the Commission's intent to revoke as well as an opportunity to submit its views to the Commission. The Commission will not proceed against a person for violation of an exclusion order, cease and desist order, or consent order with respect to any action that was taken in good faith reliance upon the Commission's advice under this section, if all relevant facts were accurately presented to the Commission and such action was promptly discontinued upon notification of revocation of the Commission's advice.
[59 FR 39039, Aug. 1, 1994, as amended at 73 FR 38327, July 7, 2008; 83 FR 21164, May 8, 2018]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1825 MARTIN A. AMICK, Employee, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-528-2) Submitted: November 18, 1997 Decided: November 26, 1997 Before HAMILTON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Martin A. Amick, Appellant Pro Se. Robin Elizabeth Shea, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissing Appellant's claims of retaliatory discharge and intentional infliction of emotional distress. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no revers ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Amick v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. , No. CA-96-528-2 (M.D.N.C. May 30, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 206.44a Special rules for conducting investigations under section 421(b) of the Trade Act. ( a ) *Service of the petition.* ( 1 ) ( i ) The Secretary shall promptly notify a petitioner when, before the establishment of a service list under § 206.17(a)(4) of this part, he or she approves an application under § 206.17(a)(2) of this part pursuant to § 206.47. When practicable, this notification shall be made by facsimile transmission. The petitioner shall then serve a copy of the petition, including all confidential business information, on the approved lead authorized applicants in accord with § 206.17(f) within 2 calendar days of the time notification is made by the Secretary.
( ii ) Upon establishment and issuance of the service list, the petitioner shall serve the lead authorized applicants enumerated on the list established by the Secretary pursuant to § 206.17(a)(4) that have not been served pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section within 2 calendar days of the establishment and issuance of the Secretary's list.
( 2 ) As the Secretary adds new authorized applicants to the service list described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the Secretary shall notify the petitioner and issue an amended list, and the petitioner shall serve new lead authorized applicants with a copy of the petition in the same manner as under paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section.
( 3 ) The petitioner shall serve a copy of the non-confidential version of the petition on those persons enumerated on the list established by the Secretary pursuant to § 201.11(d) of this chapter within 2 calendar days of the establishment and issuance of the Secretary's list, and on any additional persons within 2 calendar days of receiving notification from the Secretary of an amended list.
( 4 ) The petitioner shall attest service of the petition by filing a certificate of service with the Commission.
( b ) *Comment on information.* The parties shall have an opportunity to file comments on any information disclosed to them after they have filed their posthearing brief. Comments shall concern only such information, and shall not exceed 15 pages of textual material, double-spaced and on single-sided stationery measuring 81 ⁄ 2 × 11 inches. A comment may address the accuracy, reliability, or probative value of such information by reference to information elsewhere in the record, in which case the comment shall identify where in the record such information is found. New factual information and arguments based on that information shall be disregarded. The date on which such comments must be filed will be specified by the Commission when it specifies the time that information will be disclosed. The record shall close on the date such comments are due, except with respect to changes in bracketing of confidential business information permitted by § 206.8(c) of this part.
[68 FR 65168, Nov. 19, 2003]