alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5305. Disposition of unpaid salary and other sums on death of Representative or Resident Commissioner

When any individual who has been elected a Member of, or Resident Commissioner to, the House of Representatives dies after the commencement of the Congress to which he has been elected, any unpaid balance of salary and other sums due such individual shall be paid to the person or persons surviving at the date of death, in the following order of precedence, and such payment shall be a bar to the recovery by any other person of amounts so paid:

First, to the beneficiary or beneficiaries designated by such individual in writing to receive such unpaid balance and other sums due filed with the Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives and received by the Chief Administrative Officer prior to such individual's death;

Second, if there be no such beneficiary, to the widow or widower of such individual;

Third, if there be no beneficiary or surviving spouse, to the child or children of such individual, and descendants of deceased children, by representation;

Fourth, if none of the above, to the parents of such individual, or the survivor of them;

Fifth, if there be none of the above, to the duly appointed legal representative of the estate of the deceased individual, or if there be none, to the person or persons determined to be entitled thereto under the laws of the domicile of the deceased individual.

(July 2, 1954, ch. 455, title I, §105, 68 Stat. 409; Pub. L. 86–102, July 23, 1959, 73 Stat. 224; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §203(5), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1725.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 38a of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 struck out "(including amounts held in the trust fund account in the office of the Sergeant at Arms)" after "due such individual" in first undesignated par. and substituted "Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives and received by the Chief Administrative Officer" for "Sergeant at Arms, and received by the Sergeant at Arms" in second undesignated par.

1959—Pub. L. 86–102 inserted provisions including amounts held in trust fund account, authorizing an individual to designate a beneficiary or beneficiaries, and prescribing order of precedence in cases where no designation of beneficiary has been made.
#### § 201.102 Application.

This part applies to all programs or activities conducted by the agency.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Mexoro Minerals Limited (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2006, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: April 3, 2007 /s/ Kurt Bordian Chief Financial Officer
### §441f. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 441f was editorially reclassified as section 30122 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-182 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, August 27, 1999)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards

(ACRS) has scheduled meetings of its subcommittees on thermal-hydraulic phenomena

and severe accident management September 15-17 in Rockville, Maryland.

Both meetings will be held in the agency’s Two White Flint North building at 11545

Rockville Pike.

The subcommittee on thermal-hydraulic phenomena, meeting September 15-16, will

continue its review of the Office of Research’s thermal-hydraulic research program, including its

plan for consolidating codes and the proposed resolution of generic safety issue 23: “Reactor

Coolant Pump Seal Failures.” The meeting will begin at 8:30 a.m. each day in room T-2B1.

The subcommittee on severe accident management, meeting September 16-17, will

review the modifications proposed by the Combustion Engineering Owners Group to the post

accident sampling system requirements for their nuclear plants. They will also review the status

of NRC staff and nuclear industry activities pertaining to the issue of control room integrity. The

meeting September 16 will be held in room T-2B1 beginning at 1:00 p.m; the meeting on

September 17 will be held in room T-2B3 beginning at 8:30 a.m.

Those wishing to make oral statements or to confirm the schedule should notify Paul

Boehnert, 301-415-8065, in advance. Other aspects of the meeting, including opportunities for

public comment, will be described in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register. ACRS

meting notices, transcripts and letter reports are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW.

###
#### In the Matter of Elmer T. W. Benson et al., Appellants, against John H. Delaney et al., Constituting the Board of Transportation of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Cohn, Callahan., Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diametrics Medical, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David
B. Kaysen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /s/ David B. KaysenDavid B. KaysenChief Executive Officer
June 13, 2005
Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 1, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136029 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. SEVELTA W. LOFTON, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136029 

 COA: 277845 
 WCAC: 01-000331 

AUTOZONE, INC., and EMPLOYERS

INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU,

Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

SECOND INJURY FUND (DUAL

EMPLOYMENT PROVISIONS), 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 4, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the decision of the Workers’ Compensation 

Appellate Commission mailed April 4, 2007, and we REMAND this case to the Board of 

Magistrates for reconsideration in light of Stokes v Chrysler LLC, 481 Mich 266 (2008). 

If it is found that the plaintiff is disabled under MCL 418.301(4), but that the limitation of 

wage earning capacity is only partial, the magistrate shall compute wage loss benefits 

under MCL 418.361(1), based upon what the plaintiff remains capable of earning. The 

magistrate assigned to this case may take additional proofs upon request of either party. 

We DIRECT the magistrate to issue a decision and file that decision with the Clerk of 

this Court within 126 days of the date of this order. 

We retain jurisdiction. 

CAVANAGH, J., would deny leave to appeal.

 WEAVER, J. (dissenting). 
 _________________________________________ 

 

 

2 

I dissent from the order vacating the decision of the Workers’ Compensation 

Appellate Commission and remanding this case to the Board of Magistrates for 

reconsideration in light of Stokes v Chrysler LLC, 481 Mich 266 (2008). 

Because I dissented from the majority opinion in Stokes v Chrysler LLC, 481 Mich 

at 320 (Weaver, J., dissenting), I vote to grant leave to appeal in this case to consider 

whether a majority of this Court reached the correct decision in Stokes. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal to reconsider Stokes v Chrysler LLC, 481 

Mich 266 (2008). 

0924 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 1, 2008 

 Clerk
#### § 122.171 Description of program.

The Air Carrier Smuggling Prevention Program (ACSPP) is designed to enlist the cooperation of the air carriers, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1584 note, in Customs efforts to prevent the smuggling of controlled substances. If carriers develop and implement thorough and complete internal security procedures at ACSPP designated terminals and foreign departure and intermediate points, the opportunity for their conveyances being used for transportation of controlled substances will be greatly reduced. Participation in the program is voluntary, and may be limited to specific routes. Should a controlled substance be introduced into the United States on a conveyance owned or operated by a participating carrier however, the carrier will be exempt from seizure and penalties should it satisfy the provisions of § 122.175 of this part. The program will be operational for a period of 2 years from December 18, 1989, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1584 note.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Antonio Treminio, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Novo Energies Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1) the Annual Report on this Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: July 14, 2011





/s/ Antonio Treminio


Antonio Treminio


Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and


Acting Principal Accounting Officer
United States Department of State

 Bureau of Oceans and International 

 Environmental and Scientific Affairs

 Washington, D.C. 20520

January 24, 2013

Mr. Marco Gonzalez

Executive Secretary

Ozone Secretariat

United Nations Environment Programme

United Nations Avenue

P.O. Box 30552

Nairobi, Kenya

Dear Mr. Gonzalez:

Consistent with provisions of the Montreal Protocol and of Decision IX/6 of the Parties, the United States 

submits the enclosed nomination for a methyl bromide critical use exemption (CUE) in 2015. This nomination is 

intended for consideration by the Parties to the Protocol at their Twenty Fifth meeting in 2013. The enclosed document 

includes separate chapters that describe each of the three sectors for which the United States is making a nomination: 

California strawberries, dates, and dry cured pork products. We hope that this organization provides the information in 

the most accessible manner to facilitate the efforts of the Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee (MBTOC) 

during their review.

We also wish to ensure MBTOC is aware that tolerances related to sulfuryl fluoride are under consideration in 

the United States, and we are keeping that under close review as that process moves forward. Consistent with past 

practice, the U.S. critical use nomination is based on available alternatives that are viable at the time of the nomination. 

We would revisit the U.S. Government’s decision not to nominate certain sectors should the registration status of 

sulfuryl fluoride in the United States change significantly. 

We appreciate your consideration of this application, and look forward to working with you and others to 

answer any questions that may arise during the review process. Best regards.

Sincerely,

John Thompson

Deputy Director

Office of Environmental Policy
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer of TEPPCO GP, Inc., the sole
general partner of TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited Partnership (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31, 2002, filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|                                                  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|April 1, 2003                                     |  | 
|                                                  |  | 
|Date                                              |  | 
|                                                  |  | 
|/s/ CHARLES H. LEONARD                            |  | 
|                                                  |  | 
|Charles H. Leonard                                |  | 
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |
Case 0:20-mj-06230-AOV Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2020 Page 1 of 6
Case 0:20-mj-06230-AOV Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2020 Page 2 of 6
Case 0:20-mj-06230-AOV Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2020 Page 3 of 6
Case 0:20-mj-06230-AOV Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2020 Page 4 of 6
Case 0:20-mj-06230-AOV Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2020 Page 5 of 6
Case 0:20-mj-06230-AOV Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2020 Page 6 of 6
### §805. Regional award directors of program; appointment criteria

Regional award directors may be appointed by the Board, upon recommendation of the Director, for any State or other appropriate geographic area of the United States. The Director shall make such recommendations with respect to a State or geographic area only after soliciting recommendations regarding such appointments from public and private youth organizations within such State or geographic area.

(Pub. L. 96–114, title I, §105, formerly §6, Nov. 16, 1979, 93 Stat. 853; renumbered title I, §105, Pub. L. 106–533, §1(b)(1), (2), Nov. 22, 2000, 114 Stat. 2553.)
§ 6102.2 Management to Protect Intact Landscapes. ( a ) The BLM will maintain an inventory of landscape intactness as a resource value using watershed condition assessments (*see* § 6103.2(a)) to establish a consistent baseline condition.
( b ) When updating a resource management plan under part 1600 of this chapter, the BLM will use a baseline condition of intactness and available high-quality information about landscape intactness, such as watershed condition assessments, environmental disturbances, and monitoring (*see* § 6103.2), to: ( 1 ) Identify and delineate boundaries for intact landscapes within the planning area, taking into consideration habitat connectivity and migration corridor data;
( 2 ) Evaluate alternatives to protect intact landscapes or portions of the intact landscapes from activities that would permanently or significantly disrupt, impair, or degrade the ecosystem's structure or functionality of the intact landscapes; and
( 3 ) Identify which intact landscapes or portions of intact landscapes will be managed for protection consistent with the principles enumerated in § 6102.1(a).
( c ) The BLM will identify desired conditions and landscape objectives to guide implementation of decisions regarding management of intact landscapes, habitat connectivity, and old-growth forests. As part of carrying out paragraph (b) of this section, the BLM will seek to: ( 1 ) Establish partnerships to work across Federal and non-Federal lands to promote and protect intact landscapes;
( 2 ) Work with communities to identify geographic areas important for their strategic growth and development in order to allow for better identification of the most suitable areas to protect intact landscapes and habitat connectivity;
( 3 ) Consult with Tribes to identify opportunities for co-stewardship to protect intact landscapes (*see* § 6102.5(b)(4) through (6)); and
( 4 ) Use high-quality information including standardized quantitative monitoring to evaluate the effectiveness of management actions for ecosystem resilience (*see* § 6103.2).
( d ) When determining whether to acquire lands or interests in lands through purchase, donation, or exchange, authorized officers must prioritize the acquisition of lands or interests in lands that would further protect and connect intact landscapes and functioning ecosystems.
( e ) Authorized officers must collect and track landscape intactness data to support minimizing surface disturbance and inform conservation actions. This information must be included in a publicly available national tracking system.
#### HANSON, Respondent, v. HARRIS, Appellant.

(183 N. W. 115.)

(File No. 4842.

Opinion filed June 2, 1921.)

Appeal — Amending Settled Record — Proceedings Re Improper Conduct Defendant’s Attorney and Juror, Irrelevancy of to Issue— Amendment Denied — Point Distinguished.

*194Where plaintiff had recovered judgment, and defendant- appellant moves in Supreme ¡Court to amend settled record, toy having incorporated therein certain affidavits and procedure had before trial court in contempt procedure, involving alleged improper conduct by defendant's attorney and one of the jurors in relation to the trial below, such motion will toe denied, the matter proposed to be brought into settled record being wholly immaterial and foreign to any issue involved on appeal. Were plaintiff here seeking new trial on ground that verdict in his favor was too small, then such matter might be ground for granting new trial.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Roberts County. Hon. Frank Anderson, Judge.

Action by Iver Hanson, against H. G. Harris. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from' an order granting a new trial, defendant appeals. On defendant-appellant’s motion to amend settled record.

Motion denied.

*Batterton & Bundle, B. J. Turner,*and *Geo. S. Rix,*for Appellant.

*Howard Babcock,*and *C. R. Jorgenson,*for Respondent.

McCOY, J.

Motion to amend the settled record by having incorporated therein certain affidavits and procedure had before the trial court in contempt procedure, wherein it was contended that one of the attorneys for the defendant and one of the jurors on the trial below had been guilty of improper conduct in relation to the trial of said case. It appears from the record that verdict and judgment were rendered in favor of the plaintiff. We are of the view that this motion to amend the settled record should be denied. The matter which it is proposed to incorporate and include in the settled record by this motion is wholly immaterial and foreign to any issue that might be involved on the appeal. The plaintiff is not appealing, nor making any objection to the verdict or judgment as rendered. If the plaintiff was here seeking a new trial ¡by reason of the 'fact that plaintiff was of the view that the verdict in his favor was smaller than it should have been, then such matter sought to be included in the settled record might be ground for granting a new trial. But it is the defendant wiho is appealing and seeking a new trial, which can only be determined on the record as disclosed by the settled record as it already exists.

*195For these reasons the motion to amend the settled record should be denied. ■
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-009 February 23, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH PPL MARCH 1 TO DISCUSS

SUSQUEHANNA INSPECTION FINDING

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff members will meet with representatives of the

Susquehanna nuclear power plant on Thursday, March 1, to discuss a recent inspection finding

pertaining to radiation protection at the facility. The plant is located in Berwick, Pa., and operated by

PPL Susquehanna LLC.

The meeting, called a Regulatory Conference, will begin at 10 a.m. in the Public Meeting Room

at the NRC Region I office, 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. It will be open to the public.

NRC staff members will be available afterward to answer questions from members of the public.

Participants will discuss an inspection finding that has been preliminarily assessed as “white,”

which means it is considered to be of low to moderate safety significance. Color assessments are used

to determine the NRC’s response to the findings, with options that can include additional meetings

with plant officials and follow-up inspections.

The Susquehanna Regulatory Conference will cover a potential white finding involving a

substantial potential for plant personnel to sustain external radiation exposures in excess of

occupational radiation exposure limits. Specifically, it appears that such a potential for exposure

occurred as a result of a failure to adequately evaluate the radiological hazards posed by highly

radioactive particles encountered between September and December 14, 2000, during work on

irradiated reactor hardware equipment and tools.

The NRC uses a four-category rating system for its inspection findings; from green, through

white and yellow, to red, depicting increasing safety significance. A similar rating system is used for

the quarterly performance indicators, which are statistical measures of the safety performance of

various plant functions. Further information on these inspection findings, including the text of the

inspection reports, is available on the NRC’s web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS

Following the March 1 meeting, the NRC staff will continue its review of the finding and

determine its final assessment and the agency’s resulting actions. The outcome of the NRC staff’s
review of these findings, which normally takes four to six weeks, will be on the NRC’s enforcement

web page at” www.nrc.gov/OE

Additional information on the NRC’s reactor inspection and assessment program is on the web

site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/index.html

##