alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-03-002 January 14, 2003 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC SPECIAL INSPECTION TEAM BEGINS WORK AT PEACH BOTTOM

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has sent a special inspection team to follow-up on an

automatic reactor shutdown last month at Peach Bottom Unit 2. Members of the team began work

yesterday (1/13). The plant, operated by Exelon Generation Company, is located in Delta, Pa.

On December 21, Peach Bottom Unit 2 shut down automatically from 100 percent power after

the main steam isolation valves closed. In addition to the failure which led to the closure of the valves,

several other equipment problems occurred. The plant was safely shut down. There was no danger to

the public and no radiation was released. 

(The main steam system directs steam from the reactor vessel to the main turbine. The main

steam isolation valves ((MSIVs)) are an engineered safety feature designed to shut off steam flow, if

necessary. If the MSIVs close, the reactor shuts down automatically.)

The purpose of the inspection is to independently evaluate equipment and human performance

and to assess Exelon’s root cause evaluation and corrective actions. 

The four-member team will document its findings in an inspection report that will be issued

within 45 days of the close of the inspection. 

###
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               6,327
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       96,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                           628
<INVENTORY>                                          6,346
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   123,962
<PP&E>                                              16,266
<DEPRECIATION>                                      12,520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     192,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               76,396
<BONDS>                                            113,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                29
<OTHER-SE>                                             988
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       192,966
<SALES>                                            331,268
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   336,306
<CGS>                                              280,903
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      334,685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       292
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10,947
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,621
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,368
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    253
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     (2,770)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (2,517)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
#### MILLER, Respondent, v. MILLER, Appellant.

(182 N. W. 311.)

(File No. 4814.

Opinion filed April 2, 1921.)

Appeals — Appeal From Order, Appeal Abandoned^ — Dismissal of Appeal.

While notice of appeal from an order was duly served, yet, no briefs having been filled by either ¡party to the appeal, and nearly five months having elapsed since service of notice of appeal, the appeal is deemed abandoned, and is dismissed.

McCoy, J., not sitting.

Appeal from ¡Circuit 'Court, 'Union County. Hon. Robert B. Tripp, Judge.

*77Action by E. W-. Miller, against J. A. -Miller. Appeal from an order refusing to vacate- a judgment of dismissal in favor of plaintiff.

Appeal dismissed.

*Claude A. Bennett,*for Appellant.

*0.. C. Donlé¡y,*for Respondent.

'SMITH, J.

'Appeal from an order of the circuit court in and for Union county, entered -September n, 1920, refusing to vacate a judgment of dismissal in favor of plaintiff in the above-entitled action. Notice of the entry of the order appealed from was served' on defendant’s attorney September 17, 1920!

Notice of appeal was served November 17, 1920:

Appeal dismissed.

McCOY, J., not sitting.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending July 3, 2005 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    the information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending July 3, 2005
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Philip R. MengelPhilip R. MengelChief Executive OfficerDated: October 4, 2005
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-049 August 1, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC ASSIGNS NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR

TO CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have selected Leonard Cline

as the agencyís resident inspector at the Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant. He joins Senior Resident

Inspector David Beaulieu at the Lusby, Md., plant.

Cline joined the NRC as a reactor engineer in the Region I office in September 1999. He was

then assigned as a reactor inspector in the Performance Evaluation Branch in the Regionís Division of

Reactor Safety. Prior to joining the Agency, he was an officer in the United States Navy, where he

completed the Navyís nuclear training program. 

Cline earned a bachelorís degree in civil engineering from Pennsylvania State University. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They

serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring

significant work projects and talking with plant workers and the public. 

The Calvert Cliffs resident inspectors can be reached at 410/586-2626.

###
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-11 May 4, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH PUBLIC TO DISCUSS

NEW REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROGRAM FOR GRAND GULF

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting Thursday, May 11 in Port

Gibson, Miss., to discuss the revised reactor oversight program for Grand Gulf, a nuclear power plant

near that city operated by Entergy Operations, Inc.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. in the Claiborne County Civil Defense Media Center

Auditorium, Highway 18E, Port Gibson. Anyone who would like to learn more about the new

oversight process or ask questions of NRC officials is invited to attend.

The new program was implemented nationwide in early April after a six-month pilot test

conducted at 13 nuclear power plants at nine sites from May to November 1999. It uses more

objective, timely, and safety-significant criteria in assessing performance, while seeking to more

effectively and efficiently regulate the industry. It also takes into account improvements in the

performance of the nuclear industry over the past twenty years.

Under the new program, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional office-based

personnel are supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance indicators.

These performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant performance, including the

viability of redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection, and security.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC’s internet website every three months, along with semi-annual updates to each plant's inspection

plans. Current performance information for Grand Gulf can be found at

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/GG1/gg1_chart.html .

A plain language summary of the new inspection and assessment program is available from the

NRC Office of Public Affairs or on the website at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm .

###
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-29 March 26, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

VIOLATIONS OF NRC REQUIREMENTS AT BEAVER VALLEY NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has cited Duquesne Light

Company, the operator of the Beaver Valley nuclear power plant,

in Shippingport, Pa., for three violations of agency requirements

involving mispositioned valves and other components. However, no

fines are being levied against the company because of its

identification of the violations and prompt corrective actions.

At a predecisional enforcement conference on March 7, NRC

and Beaver Valley staff discussed the infractions, which were

identified during inspections conducted at the plant between

December 22, 1996, and February 8. The violations are as

follows:

ˇ A failure by plant staff, on numerous occasions, to

follow procedures and implement appropriate work practices and

controls, leading to the incorrect positioning of numerous valves

and switches.

ˇ Operators inadvertently de-energizing the waste gas decay

tank oxygen analyzers, as well as a failure to monitor oxygen

concentration when running the degassifier connected to the waste

gas decay tank. The oxygen concentration must be monitored to

determine whether an explosive gas mixture is present.

ˇ Despite the identification of numerous plant

configuration control deficiencies in 1995, a failure to take

appropriate action to make sure such problems were adequately

corrected.

In a letter to Duquense Light, NRC Region I Administrator

Hubert J. Miller stressed the importance of ensuring valves and

components are in the proper position. "The violations also

reveal the need for greater technical inquisitiveness among your

staff and the need for greater sensitivity to maintaining

configuration control and promptly identifying and correcting

(problems) when such control is not maintained," Mr. Miller said.

While no fines are being levied in light of the plant

operator's identification and correction of the violations,

similar findings in the future could result in additional

enforcement action, the NRC has informed the utility.

Duquense Light has taken steps aimed at avoiding any

recurrences of the problems, including regular reviews of all
valves for proper positioning and the immobilization of certain

valves.

Said Mr. Miller: "Important in this regard are steps you

have taken to strengthen station corrective action processes to

address broader performance issues. These actions include

establishing a lower threshold for identifying and documenting

problems, strengthening self-assessment efforts, and increasing

management involvement in verifying effectiveness of corrective

actions."

#
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS REGION IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-01-044 August 8, 2001

CONTACT: Breck Henderson 

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC APPOINTS JEFFREY CRUZ RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT WOLF CREEK

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has appointed Jeffrey Cruz resident

inspector at Wolf Creek Generation Station, a nuclear power plant near Burlington, Kansas. He joins

senior resident inspector Frank Brush.

Mr. Cruz holds a masterís degree in nuclear engineering with emphasis in health

physics from the University of Missouri in 1994. He earned a bachelorís degree in general studies with

emphasis in mathematics in 1991, also from the University of Missouri.

Mr. Cruz joined the NRC in 1995 as a radiation specialist in the Region IV offices in

Arlington, Texas. He became a senior health physicist in 1999, also at Region IV. While at Wolf

Creek, Mr. Cruz and his family will reside in Ottawa, Kansas.

###
Exhibit 21.1



                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                                  State of
                                                                                           Percentage of        Incorporation or
        Parent                           Subsidiary                                         Ownership            Organization
----------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------- ---------------------

<S>                                 <C>                                                     <C>                 <C>
Warwick Community Bancorp, Inc.     The Warwick Savings Bank                                  100%                 New York
Warwick Community Bancorp, Inc.     Hardenburgh Abstract Company of Orange County, Inc.       100%                 New York
Warwick Community Bancorp, Inc.     The Towne Center Bank                                   99.75%                New Jersey
The Warwick Savings Bank            WSB Financial Services, Inc.                              100%                 New York
The Warwick Savings Bank            Warsave Development Corp.                                 100%                 New York
The Warwick Savings Bank            The Towne Center Mortgage Company, Inc.                   100%                New Jersey
The Warwick Savings Bank            WSB Funding Corp.                                         (1)                  Delaware
The Warwick Savings Bank            The Warwick Commercial Bank                               100%                 New York


</TABLE>

(1)    Owns 100% of the outstanding common stock and 86.96% of the outstanding
       preferred stock.
#### § 177.31 Reexamination of final determinations.

A party-at-interest, other than the party-at-interest which requested and received the initial final determination, may ask Customs to consider the matter anew and issue, on an expedited basis, a new final determination. Such a request shall specifically identify the previous final determination. Upon receipt of such a request, Customs will issue a new final determination within five working days of receipt of the request unless (a) the previous final determination was the subject of a contested lawsuit timely filed in the Court of International Trade under 28 U.S.C. 1581(e) or, (b) the merchandise at issue in the initial final determination was tendered and deemed responsive to the request for proposals or an invitation for bids in a competitive procurement subject to the Buy American Act (41 U.S.C. 10a *et seq.*) and a contract under such procurement was let. Any new final determination issued under this section shall be published in accordance with § 177.29 and is reviewable under § 177.30.
§ 212.07 Rulemaking on maximum rates for attorney fees. ( a ) If warranted by an increase in the cost of living or by special circumstances (such as limited availability of attorneys qualified to handle certain types of proceedings), the Commission may adopt regulations providing that attorney fees may be awarded at a rate higher than $75 per hour in the proceedings covered by this part. The Commission will conduct any rulemaking proceedings for this purpose under the informal rulemaking procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act.
( b ) Any person may file with the Commission a petition for rulemaking to increase the maximum rate for attorney fees. The petition should identify the rate the petitioner believes the Commission should establish. It should also explain fully the reasons why the higher rate is warranted. The Commission will respond to the petition within 60 days after it is filed by initiating a rulemaking proceeding, denying the petition, or taking other appropriate action.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1



               TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED

                                  Certification

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Rick Tsai, Chief
Executive Officer of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (the
"Company"), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Company's annual report
on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



Date: April 15, 2008

                                            By:/s/ Rick Tsai
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Name:  Rick Tsai
                                               Title: Chief Executive Officer


     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

I, Gregory B. Milton, of OMNI Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OMNI Energy Services Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 30, 2007



/s/ Gregory B. MiltonGregory B. MiltonChief Accounting Officer
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.424 Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment of non-originating cotton or man-made fiber fabric or apparel goods. ( a ) *Effect of noncompliance.* If the importer fails to comply with any requirement under this subpart, including submission of a certificate of eligibility under § 10.422 of this subpart, the Center director may deny preferential tariff treatment to the imported good.
( b ) *Failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment.* Where the requirements for preferential tariff treatment set forth elsewhere in this subpart are met, the Center director nevertheless may deny preferential tariff treatment to a good for which a TPL claim is made if the good is shipped through or transshipped in a country other than Chile or the United States, and the importer of the good does not provide, at the request of the Center director, copies of documents demonstrating to the satisfaction of the Center director that the requirements set forth in § 10.425 of this subpart were met.
[CBP Dec. 05-07, 70 FR 10873, Mar. 7, 2005, as amended by CBP Dec. 06-39, 71 FR 76133, Dec. 20, 2006]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO.: 20-CV-81205-RAR/REINHART 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 

GROUP, INC. d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et al. 

Defendants. 

______________________________________/ 

ORDER ON NON-PARTY PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY’S 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Non-Party Pacific Life Insurance Company’s 

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to respond to Receiver, Ryan K. Stumphauzer’s Motion 

to Compel Pacific Life Insurance Company’s Compliance with Subpoena (D.E. 1655). The Court 

having considered the Motion, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED AND 

ADJUDGED as follows: 

1. Non-Party Pacific Life Insurance Company’s Unopposed Motion is GRANTED. 

2. Pacific Life shall have until August 30, 2023 to file their response to Receiver, 

Ryan K. Stumphauzer’s Motion to Compel Pacific Life Insurance Company’s 

Compliance with Subpoena (D.E. 1655). 

SO ORDERED. 

BRUCE E. REINHART 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Date: August ___, 2023 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1674-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 143.43 RLF eligibility criteria. ( a ) *Automation criteria.* To be eligible for RLF, a licensed customs broker or importer of record must be: ( 1 ) Operational on the ABI (*see* 19 CFR part 143, subpart A);
( 2 ) Operational on the EIP prior to applying for RLF; and
( 3 ) Operational on the ACH (or any other CBP-approved method of electronic payment), for purposes of directing the electronic payment of duties, taxes and fees (*see* 19 CFR 24.25), 30 days before transmitting a RLF entry.
( b ) *Broker must have national permit.* To be eligible for RLF, a licensed customs broker must hold a valid national permit (*see* 19 CFR 111.19(f)).
( c ) *Continuous bond.* A RLF entry must be secured with a continuous bond.
### §6541. Professional archivist; Secretary's authority to obtain services from General Services Administration

For each fiscal year (beginning with the fiscal year which ends September 30, 1982), the Secretary of the Senate is authorized to expend from the contingent fund of the Senate such amount as may be necessary to enable the Secretary to obtain from the General Services Administration the services of a professional archivist. Such services shall be obtained on a reimbursable basis and shall not be obtained except with the consent of the General Services Administration and the Committee on Rules and Administration.

(Pub. L. 97–92, title I, §125, Dec. 15, 1981, 95 Stat. 1198.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 61b–3 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Reimbursement of Archivist of the United States for Expenditures for Project To Provide for Preservation of Records of Continuing Value of Senate; Payment, etc., of Amounts

Pub. L. 97–257, title I, §107, Sept. 10, 1982, 96 Stat. 850, provided that for the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 1982, and for each of the next three succeeding fiscal years, the Secretary of the Senate was authorized to pay to the General Services Administration such amounts, not to exceed $300,000, needed to reimburse the Archivist of the United States for certain expenditures made to conduct a project to provide for the proper preservation of the Senate's records of continuing value.