alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GadgetSalon GoPro Brushless Gimbal Quick Start Guide 

Download GUI software, USB driver, user manual and installation guide here: 

https:/ /sites.google.com/site/gadgetsaloncs/downloads 

Dear Customer, 

Thank you for choosing GadgetSalon and our brush less gimbal product. This is the easiest to use 

brushless gimbal in the market. Every brushless gimbal has been carefully tuned and tested by our 

technicians before shipping. If you have any questions, please send us an eBay message. 

Important: 

1. This brushless gimbal comes preloaded with the latest BGC 2.2b2 firmware, please DO 

NOT try to flash the firmware yourself. 

2. Power supply: DC 7.4V-14.8V (Li-Po 3S is Recommended) 

Simple BGC GU/ Version: SimpleBGC_GU/_2.2b2 

3. Please attach the GoPro camera before powering it up. Otherwise, incorrect weight 

balance will cause the gimbal to turn erratically 

4. Gyro calibration is made on every power-on after 3-4 second delay, It is VERY 

IMPORTANT to keep the system at rest for a few seconds after power-on 

5. Please DO NOT pull the micro USB port on controller board when connected with USB 

cable 

Accelerometer calibration 

This is generally done one time at the beginning of the system tuning . But it is better to re-calibrate 

accelerometer after a long time, or when the temperature was considerably changed since last calibration. 

To calibrate accelerometer, you don't need to connect main power, Just connect USB cable. Go to your 

GUI software: Level the sensor board strictly horizontally (this is "base position"), fix it in this position by 

hands, and press CALIB_ACC button. Signal LED will flash about 2-3 seconds. Don't move sensor board 

while calibrating. Then press WRITE to record your calibration to controller. You can also do this by 

clicking the button on the controller board (1 click) while level the sensor board horizontally and fix it in 

this position by hands. See pictures. 

Connecting gimbal to your computer 

To connect the controller to the PC, you need to install CP21 Ox USB to UART Bridge VCP Driver and 

SimpleBGC_GUI_2.2b2 tuning software for your PC. Both files can be found in the downloaded folder. 

Software and user manual download: 

https:/ /sites.google.com/site/gadgetsaloncs/downloads
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00341-CV

Kennie Sneed and Mildred Sneed, Appellants

v.

General Agents Insurance Company of America, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN500736, HONORABLE SUZANNE COVINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The clerk’s record containing appellants’ notice of appeal was filed on June 2, 2005.

On October 11, appellants filed their first motion for an extension of time to file their brief. This

Court granted the motion and extended the deadline to November 17. On November 17, appellants

faxed a request for a further extension. This Court called appellants and notified them that we

cannot accept faxed filings and requested a proper motion with a certificate of conference attached;

such a motion was never received by this Court. On December 6, this Court sent appellants notice

that their brief was overdue, requesting a response by December 16, but that notice was returned.

This Court spoke to appellants’ counsel’s office and re-sent the notice on December 27, but to date,

appellants have not responded.
2

We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution on our own motion. Tex.

R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: January 27, 2006
### **CHAPTER 2—WOMEN'S BUREAU**

Sec.
11.
Bureau established.
12.
Director of bureau; appointment.
13.
Powers and duties of bureau.
14.
Assistant director of bureau; appointment; duties.
15, 16.
Repealed.
§ 190.71 Drawback on articles destroyed under CBP supervision. ( a ) *Procedure.* At least 7 working days before the intended date of destruction of merchandise or articles upon which drawback is intended to be claimed, a Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy, or Return Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback on CBP Form 7553 must be filed by the claimant with the CBP port where the destruction is to take place, giving notification of the date and specific location where the destruction is to occur. Within 4 working days after receipt of the CBP Form 7553, CBP will advise the filer in writing of its determination to witness or not to witness the destruction. If the filer of the notice is not so notified within 4 working days, the merchandise may be destroyed without delay and will be deemed to have been destroyed under CBP supervision. Unless CBP determines to witness the destruction, the destruction of the articles following timely notification on CBP Form 7553 will be deemed to have occurred under CBP supervision. If CBP attends the destruction, CBP will certify on CBP Form 7553.
( b ) *Evidence of destruction.* When CBP does not attend the destruction, the claimant must submit evidence that destruction took place in accordance with the Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy, or Return Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback on CBP Form 7553. The evidence must be issued by a disinterested third party (for example, a landfill operator). The type of evidence depends on the method and place of destruction, but must establish that the merchandise was, in fact, destroyed within the meaning of “destruction” in § 190.2.
( c ) *Completion of drawback entry.* After destruction, the claimant must provide CBP Form 7553, certified by the CBP official witnessing the destruction in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, to CBP as part of the complete drawback claim based on the destruction (*see* § 190.51(a)). If CBP has not attended the destruction, the claimant must provide the evidence that destruction took place in accordance with the approved CBP Form 7553, as provided for in paragraph (b) of this section, as part of the complete drawback claim based on the destruction (*see* § 190.51(a)).
( d ) *Deduction for value of recovered materials.* Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(x), a destruction may include a process by which materials are recovered from imported merchandise or from an article manufactured from imported merchandise for drawback claims made pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1313(a), (b), (c), and (j). In determining the amount of duties to be refunded as drawback to a claimant, the value of recovered materials (including the value of any tax benefit or royalty payment) that accrues to the drawback claimant must be deducted from the value of the imported merchandise that is destroyed, or from the value of the merchandise used, or designated as used, in the manufacture of the article.
### §64–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 64–2 was editorially reclassified as section 6562 of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 64–2, Pub. L. 95–26, title I, §108, May 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 85, provided that, on and after May 4, 1977, Secretary of Senate was authorized to transfer funds between appropriations with approval of a resolution of Senate.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), that the November 10, 2004 regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board) has been rescheduled. The regular meeting of the Board will be held November 18, 2004 starting at 9 a.m. An agenda for this meeting will be published at a later date. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jeanette C. Brinkley, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056. 

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090. 

Dated: October 20, 2004. 

Jeanette C. Brinkley, 

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board. 

[FR Doc. 04-23852 Filed 10-20-04; 2:11 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
§ 212.06 Allowable fees and expenses. ( a ) Awards will be based on rates customarily charged by persons engaged in the business of acting as attorneys, agents and expert witnesses, even if the services were made available without charge or at a reduced rate to the applicant.
( b ) No award for the fee of an attorney or agent under these rules may exceed $75.00 per hour. No award to compensate an expert witness may exceed the highest rate at which the Commission pays expert witnesses. However, an award may include the reasonable expenses of the attorney, agent, or expert witness as a separate item if the attorney, agent or expert witness ordinarily charges clients separately for such expenses.
( c ) In determining the reasonableness of the fee sought for an attorney, agent or expert witness, the presiding officer shall consider the following: ( 1 ) If the attorney, agent or expert witness is in private practice, his or her customary fee for similar services, or, if an employee of the applicant, the fully allocated cost of the service;
( 2 ) The prevailing rate for similar services in the community in which the attorney, agent or expert witness ordinarily performs services;
( 3 ) The time actually spent in the representation of the applicant;
( 4 ) The time reasonably spent in light of the difficulty or complexity of the issues in the adversary adjudication; and
( 5 ) Such other factors as may bear on the value of the services provided.
( d ) The reasonable cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, project or similar matter prepared on behalf of a party may be awarded to the extent that the charge for the service does not exceed the prevailing rate for similar services and the study or other matter was necessary for preparation of the applicant's case.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CIV-61650-RAR

CYNTHIA LAREMORE,

Plaintiff,

v.

HOLIDAY CVS, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/ 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice

[ECF No. 82], filed on November 2, 2021. Being fully advised, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-styled case is DISMISSED with 

prejudice. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 2nd day of November, 2021.

 _________________________________

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 0:20-cv-61650-RAR Document 83 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2021 Page 1 of 1
### §68–6a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 68–6a was editorially reclassified as section 6611 of this title.
§ 111.17 Review of the denial of a license. ( a ) *By the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade.* Upon the denial of an application for a license, the applicant may file with the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade, in writing, additional information or arguments in support of the application and may request to appear in person, by telephone, or by other acceptable means of communication. This filing and request must be received by the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade within sixty (60) calendar days of the denial.
( b ) *By the Executive Assistant Commissioner.* Upon the decision of the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade, affirming the denial of an application for a license, the applicant may file with the Executive Assistant Commissioner, in writing, a request for any additional review that the Executive Assistant Commissioner, deems appropriate. This request must be received by the Executive Assistant Commissioner within sixty (60) calendar days of the affirmation by the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade, of the denial of the application for a license.
( c ) *By the Court of International Trade.* Upon a decision of the Executive Assistant Commissioner affirming the denial of an application for a license, the applicant may appeal the decision to the Court of International Trade, provided that the appeal action is commenced within sixty (60) calendar days after the decision date by the Executive Assistant Commissioner.
[CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63314, Oct. 18, 2022]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-61648-RAR

BRENDA HERNANDEZ, and 

LUIS LUQUE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM’S EAST, INC.,

Defendant. 

_________________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon United States Magistrate Judge Jared M. 

Strauss’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 80] (“Report”), filed on September 5, 2021. 

The Report recommends that Defendant’s Motion to Tax Attorneys’ Fees and Costs [ECF No. 68] 

be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. See Report at 1. The Report properly 

notified the parties of their right to object to Magistrate Judge Strauss’s findings and the 

consequences for failing to object. Id. at 7.

When a magistrate judge’s “disposition” has properly been objected to, district courts must 

review the disposition de novo. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). However, when no party has timely 

objected, “the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in 

order to accept the recommendation.” FED. R. CIV. P. 72 advisory committee’s notes (citation 

omitted). Although Rule 72 itself is silent on the standard of review, the Supreme Court has 

acknowledged Congress’s intent was to only require a de novo review where objections have been 

properly filed, not when neither party objects. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (“It 

does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate [judge]’s

Case 0:20-cv-61648-RAR Document 83 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/22/2021 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to 

those findings.”). In any event, the “[f]ailure to object to the magistrate [judge]’s factual findings 

after notice precludes a later attack on these findings.” Lewis v. Smith, 855 F.2d 736, 738 (11th 

Cir. 1988) (citing Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404, 410 (5th Cir. 1982)). 

To date, no objections have been received. Thus, the Court considers it appropriate to 

review the Report for clear error. Having carefully reviewed Defendant’s Motion, the Report, the 

factual record, the applicable law, and being otherwise fully advised, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report [ECF No. 80] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. The Motion [ECF No. 68] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 

Plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $14,326.00 and non-taxable costs in the 

amount of $1,745.00, for a total award of $16,071.00.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 22nd day of September, 2021.

 _________________________________

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: Counsel of record

Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss

Case 0:20-cv-61648-RAR Document 83 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/22/2021 Page 2 of 2
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-026 March 5, 2003

 NRC ISSUES ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR NATION’S NUCLEAR PLANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued annual assessment letters to 102 of the nation’s

103 operating nuclear power plants and posted the letters on its web site. The Davis-Besse nuclear

facility in Ohio will not be issued an annual assessment letter by the agency because it is currently under

the NRC’s Inspection Manual 0350 Process. 

Every six months most plants receive either a mid-cycle review letter or an annual assessment

letter along with an NRC inspection plan. Updated information on plant performance is posted to the

NRC web site every quarter. The next mid-cycle assessment letters will be issued in September.

The assessment letters sent to each licensee are available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html and through ADAMS, the Agencywide

Documents Access and Management System. Help in using ADAMS is available from the NRC Public

Document Room by calling (301) 415-4737.

Public meetings at each of the 102 plants are planned. Details of the meetings will be

announced as scheduled.

For more information on the Davis-Besse nuclear power plant, access the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/vessel-head-degradation.html . 

###
### §§85 to 88a. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §204(33), (34)(A), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1734

Section 85, act Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 830, §1, 31 Stat. 968, related to performance of duties by employees of House.

Section 86, act Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 830, §1, 31 Stat. 968, related to division of salaries of employees of House.

Section 87, act Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 830, §1, 31 Stat. 968, related to requiring or permitting employees of House to sublet duties.

Section 88, act Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 830, §1, 31 Stat. 968, prescribed age limits of twelve and eighteen for service as pages in House of Representatives but made the restriction inapplicable to chief pages, riding pages, and telephone pages. See section 4901(b) of this title.

Section 88a, act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title II, §243, 60 Stat. 839, related to education of Congressional and Supreme Court pages, authorized appropriations, and allowed pages to elect to attend private or parochial schools.
§ 19.7 Expenses of labor and storage. ( a ) All merchandise deposited in public stores or in bonded warehouses shall be held liable for the expenses of labor and storage chargeable thereon at the customary rates and for all other expenses accruing upon the goods.
( b ) The rates of storage and labor shall be agreed upon between the importer and the warehouse proprietor, but in case of disagreement the port director may, with the consent of all parties in interest, determine the rates to be charged.
( c ) Except in cases provided for by § 141.102(d) of this chapter, when merchandise is stored in a public store under a warehouse entry, general order, or otherwise, the charges for storage due the Government shall be paid before the packages are delivered. The charges shall be based upon the existing bonded warehouse tariff of the port for storage and labor.
[28 FR 14763, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17446, July 2, 1973]
November 1, 2011

By Email

Mr. Robert Finamore,

Acting Division Chief

Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: PLUNA Líneas Aéreas Uruguayas Sociedad Anónima (“PLUNA”)

Application for an Exemption (US-Uruguay); OST-2011-0195

Dear Mr. Finamore,

PLUNA has completed its poll of the carrier parties served with its application of 

October 27, 2011, for an exemption pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109 for service between 

the United States and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay via a code-share agreement with 

American Airlines.

There were no objections to the proposed service by any of the carriers served. 

We respectfully request expedited approval of the exemption application.

Respectfully submitted,

David M. Kirstein

cc: Service List

 Docket OST-2011-0195
Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document by email on the 

following persons:

carl.nelson@aa.com

rpommer@atlasair.com

matwood@cozen.com

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com

anita.mosner@hklaw.com

oracio.marquez@united.com

dan.weiss@coair.com

thomas.bolling@united.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

cefelts@fedex.com

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com

howard.kass@usairways.com

mlbenge@zsrlaw.com

brian.hedberg@dot.gov

urskr@state.gov

Lyndsey Grunewald

November 1, 2011
§ 111.31 Conflict of interest. ( a ) *Former officer or employee of U.S. Government.* A broker who was formerly an officer or employee in U.S. Government service must not represent a client before the Department of Homeland Security or any representative of the Department of Homeland Security in any matter to which the broker gave personal consideration or gained knowledge of the facts while in U.S. Government service, except as provided in 18 U.S.C. 207.
( b ) *Relations with former officer or employee of U.S. Government.* A broker must not knowingly assist, accept assistance from, or share fees with a person who has been employed by a client in a matter pending before the Department of Homeland Security or any representative of the Department of Homeland Security to which matter that person gave personal consideration or gained personal knowledge of the facts or issues of the matter while in U.S. Government service.
( c ) *Importations by broker or employee.* A broker who is an importer himself must not act as broker for an importer who imports merchandise of the same general character as that imported by the broker unless the client has full knowledge of the facts. The same restriction will apply if a broker's employee is an importer.
### §156. Rules and regulations

The Board shall have authority from time to time to make, amend, and rescind, in the manner prescribed by subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this subchapter.

(July 5, 1935, ch. 372, §6, 49 Stat. 452; June 23, 1947, ch. 120, title I, §101, 61 Stat. 140.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"Subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5" substituted in text for "the Administrative Procedure Act" on authority of Pub. L. 89–554, §7(b), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 631, the first section of which enacted Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Amendments

1947—Act June 23, 1947, amended section generally to provide that the rules and regulations issued by the Board should be in the manner prescribed by the Administrative Procedure Act.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1947 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by act June 23, 1947, see section 104 of act June 23, 1947, set out as a note under section 151 of this title.