alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Bankshares, Ltd. (the
"Company" ) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Bruce E. Hall, principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Bruce E. Hall
---------------------------------------
Bruce E. Hall
Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary

November 12, 2002
# USCA Case #12-1427 Document #1408942 Filed: 12/07/2012 Page 1 of 2DocketID DocketTitle Agency DocketType PetitionNumbe r RIN

EPAHQOAR20100162 GreenhouseGasEmissionsStandardsandFuelEfficiencyStandardsforHeavyDutyEnginesandVehicles EPA Rulemaking N/A 2060AP61

DocumentTitle DocumentType AttachmentCount SubmitterLastName SubmitterFirstName Organization DocumentIDEPA'sDenialofthePetitiontoReconsidertheGreenhouseGasEmissionsStandardsandFuelEfficiencyStandardsforMediumandHeavyDutyEnginesandVehicles RULES N/A N/A N/A N/A EPAHQOAR201001623645LatecommentsubmittedbyClaudeD.Convisser,President&GeneralCounsel,PlantOilPoweredDieselFuelSystems,Inc.(POPDiesel)(PleaseseeEPAOAR201001623643)Includesattachments PUBLICSUBMISSIONS 1 N/A N/A N/A EPAHQOAR201001623644POPDieselPetitiontoReconsiderHeavyDutyGHG11141 1Includesattachments SUPPORTING&RELATEDMATERIALS 13 N/A N/A N/A EPAHQOAR201001623643CommentsubmittedbyClaudeD.Convisser,President,PlantOilPoweredDieselFuelSystems,Inc.(POPDiesel)Includesattachments PUBLICSUBMISSIONS 2 N/A N/A N/A EPAHQOAR201001621897 

# USCA Case #12-1427 Document #1408942 Filed: 12/07/2012 Page 2 of 2
### §333. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 333 was editorially reclassified as section 5103 of this title.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on July 13, 2004, National Center for Natural Products Research—NIDA MProject, University of Mississippi, 135 Coy Waller Complex, University, Mississippi 38677, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed: Drug
ScheduleMarihuana (7360)
ITetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
I
 The company plans to cultivate marihuana for the National Institute of Drug Abuse for research approved by the Department of Health and Human Services. Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such a substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA 
                    **Federal Register**
                     Representative (CCD) and must be filed no later than December 27, 2004. Dated: October 18, 2004. William J. Walker, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 04-23766 Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
EPA Reg. No. 79630-1 

Vol. 4 

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39 *Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
40
41
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-48 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, April 3, 1998)

NRC REVERSES LICENSING BOARD REQUIREMENT FOR STAFF INQUIRY

INTO ALLEGED RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN SITING OF PROPOSED LES FACILITY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued an order affirming

in part, reversing in part, and sending back for further proceedings

various NRC Atomic Safety and Licensing Board rulings concerning the

Louisiana Energy Services (LES) application to build a uranium

enrichment plant near Homer, Louisiana.

Acting on appeals from both LES and the NRC staff, the Commission

reversed the May 1997 Licensing Board decision requiring a more

thorough inquiry into possible racial discrimination in the siting of

the facility. The order says that such a “free-ranging inquiry” into

the site-selection process would go beyond that required by the

National Environmental Policy Act, a 1994 Presidential Executive

Order, and guidelines of the Council on Environmental Quality.

Chairman Shirley Ann Jackson disagreed with some aspects of this part

of the order, saying she would prefer that the staff further

investigate the siting process without focusing on alleged intentional

racial motives, to ensure that the siting criteria were reasonable and

applied equitably.

The Commission also stated, however, that it would give

“particularly close scrutiny” to adverse impacts that fall heavily on

minority and impoverished communities. It therefore affirmed the

Licensing Board’s ruling that the NRC environmental impact statement

inadequately considered the effect of the proposed facilities on

property values in two neighboring communities and the relocation of a

road running between them.
2

Other environmental aspects of the project affected by the

Commission order include factors involved in balancing costs and

benefits.

###

EDITORS: A copy of the order is available from this office. It is

also being posted on the NRC’s Internet web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports/lesdocs.htm.
§ 201.33 Purpose and scope. ( a ) Consistent with the principle that the public is entitled to the fullest practicable information regarding the decisionmaking processes of the Federal Government, it is the purpose of this subpart to open the meetings of the United States International Trade Commission to public observation while protecting the rights of individuals and the ability of the Commission to carry out its statutory functions and responsibilities. These regulations are promulgated pursuant to the directive of section (g) of the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(g)), and specifically implement sections (b) through (f) of said act (5 U.S.C. 552(b) through (f)).
( b ) Public access to documents being considered at Commission meetings may be obtained by access to the public files of the Commission or, where documents are not in said public files, shall be obtained in the manner set forth in subpart C of this part (§§ 201.17 through 201.21).
( c ) Unless otherwise provided by the public notices as described in § 201.35 of this subpart, public observation of Commission meetings does not encompass public participation in the deliberations at such meetings.
#### In the Matter of 76 Crown Street Corporation, Appellant-Respondent. John H. Carl & Sons, Inc., Respondent-Appellant.

Motion to resettle order denied, with $10 costs. The point urged was not saved for review on appeal. The rent *“*for the period of time involved herein ” begins in March, 1945. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ. [See 271 App. Div. 1030.]
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 8471 Dir ID: 2013 - NM - 153 - AD
Exhibit 32.1


                           GREG MANNING AUCTIONS, INC.
                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Greg Manning Auctions,
Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2005, I, Greg Manning, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Greg Manning Auctions, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   this Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with
          the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended March
          31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
          condition and results of operations of Greg Manning Auctions, Inc.

Dated:  May 12, 2005

                                          /s/ Greg Manning
                                         --------------------------------------
                                          Greg Manning, President and Chief
                                          Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93021, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 151.47 Optional entry of net quantity of petroleum or petroleum products.

Instead of stating the gross quantity of petroleum or petroleum products on the entry summary, the importer may state the net quantity. The analytical report from the Customs-accredited commercial laboratory shall be filed with the entry summary.

[T.D. 87-39, 52 FR 9790, Mar. 26, 1987, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51269, Dec. 21, 1988]
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Nos. 333  146375) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333  129073, 333  138809 and 333-149487) of Central European Distribution Corporation of our report dated June 30, 2009 relating to the financial statements of Lion/Rally Cayman 2,
which appears in this annual report on Form 10-K/A.



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers        
|                                  
|ZAO PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit  
|Kosmodamianskaya Nab., 52, Bldg. 5
|115054 Moscow                     
|Russian Federation                
|July 10, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 11.1
                                       
            STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

         The following schedules reflect the information used in calculating 
the number of shares in the computation of net loss per share for each of the 
periods set forth in the Statements of Operations.

<PAGE>
                                       
                BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATION
                        THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:

TOTAL                    # DAYS
SHARES                   OUTSTANDING
         1,750,204   x            90    =   157,518,360
                         -----------        -----------
                                  90        157,518,360
                         -----------        -----------
                         -----------        -----------

                                            157,518,360 / 90  =  1,750,204
                                                                 ---------
                                                                 ---------

Loss Per Share:

Net Loss plus dividend accrual
 plus accretion of offering costs           $(3,598,495)    =     $ (2.06)
---------------------------------           -----------           -------
                                                                  -------
   Weighted Avg. Shares                       1,750,204           

<PAGE>

                BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATION
                        THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999


Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      TOTAL                 # DAYS
      SHARES              OUTSTANDING
<S>                      <C>                  <C>
         2,179,124   x              19    =          41,403,356
         2,179,713   x              30    =          65,391,390
         2,180,358   x              41    =          89,394,678
                         --------------       -----------------
                                   273             196,189,424
                         --------------       -----------------
                         --------------       -----------------
                                                    196,189,424  / 90    =       2,179,882
                                                                             -------------
                                                                             -------------

Loss Per Share:

Net Loss plus dividend accrual
 plus accretion of offering costs                 $ (2,503,843)        =     $       (1.15)
---------------------------------                 -------------        =     -------------
                                                                             -------------
   Weighted Avg. Shares                              2,179,882
</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 351

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 351

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 89 FR 20832, Mar. 25, 2024.

#### § 351.413 Disregarding insignificant adjustments.

Ordinarily, under section 777A(a)(2) of the Act, an “insignificant adjustment” is any individual adjustment having an *ad valorem* effect of less than 0.33 percent, or any group of adjustments having an *ad valorem* effect of less than 1.0 percent, of the export price, constructed export price, or normal value, as the case may be. Groups of adjustments are adjustments for differences in circumstances of sale under § 351.410, adjustments for differences in the physical characteristics of the merchandise under § 351.411, and adjustments for differences in the levels of trade under § 351.412.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov 

No. III-03-047 July 3, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

 Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC PUBLIC MEETING JULY 10 ON UPDATING GENERIC

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR LICENSE RENEWAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting July 10 in Oak Lawn, Illinois,

concerning an update of its Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) for License Renewal of

Nuclear Plants, originally published in 1996. The meeting is one of four being held throughout the

country.

The meeting will be held at the Hilton - Oak Lawn, 9333 South Cicero Ave., Oak Lawn.

Members of the public are invited to comment on issues that the NRC should consider in its

GEIS update. NRC staff will be available for informal discussions at 6 p.m., answering questions and

providing additional information about the scoping process. The formal meeting to receive public

comments will start at 7 p.m.

The GEIS assesses the overall scope and impact of environmental effects associated with

license renewal at any nuclear power plant site. Separate supplements to the GEIS are prepared to

assess specific environmental issues at individual plants when a license renewal application is

submitted for that plant.

Those who wish to present oral comments are encouraged to register by contacting Barry

Zalcman at 800-368-5642, x2419, or via e-mail at LRGEISUpdate@nrc.gov. Speaker registration will

be available before the start of the session, but individual comment time may be limited. Written

comments should be submitted by September 2, either by mail to the Chief, Rules and Directives

Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Mail Stop T-6-D 59, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, D.C., 20555-0001, or by e-mail to LRGEISUpdate@nrc.gov.

The GEIS, its Addendum 1 that was published in 1999, and subsequent site-specific

Supplements may be viewed on the NRC web site at this address: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/nuregs/staff/sr1437/. These documents are also available in the NRC Public Document

Room at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

At the conclusion of the information-gathering process, the NRC staff will prepare a summary

of conclusions and significant issues. The summary will also be available through the NRC’s online

document library at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html. Help in using ADAMS

is available from the NRC’s Public Document Room at 800/397-4209. 

The NRC will hold additional public meetings for public comment once the draft GEIS

revision is prepared.

###
Exhibit 99.2
                                                                    ------------

                                Certification of
                             Chief Financial Officer
                         of Prime Medical Services, Inc.


This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for
the quarter ended September 30, 2002 of Prime Medical Services, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Issuer").

I, John Q. Barnidge, the Chief Financial Officer of Issuer, certify that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section
              13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
              U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Issuer.

Dated:  November 13, 2002.



                              /s/ John Q. Barnidge
                             -------------------------------------
                             John Q. Barnidge
                             Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                             Prime Medical Services, Inc.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011- 4005

No. IV-03-007 March 19, 2003 

CONTACT: Victor Dricks E-mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128 

NRC TO MEET WITH OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT TO DISCUSS

 PERFORMANCE OF FORT CALHOUN NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of the Omaha Public Power

District on Thursday, March 27, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual assessment of safety

performance at the Fort Calhoun Nuclear Plant. The facility is located north of Omaha, Nebraska.

 The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 7:00 p.m.

at the Holiday Inn Express, 10729 J Street (just north of 108th Street), Omaha.

Before the session is adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the public

on the safety performance of the plant, as well as the role of the NRC in ensuring safe plant operation.

 The performance period to be discussed is January 1 to December 31, 2002. In addition, NRC staff

will provide an overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process works.

 A letter sent from the NRC Region IV Office to the Omaha Public Power District addresses the

performance of the plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is

available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/fcs_2002q4.pdf

“Overall, Fort Calhoun Station operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and

fully met all cornerstone objectives,” the letter says. During the most recent quarter, plant staff detected

radiation that exceeded required levels on the external surface of a shipment package, but took “immediate

corrective actions” in response. “Your staff determined that no members of the public came in close

proximity to the package during shipment; therefore the shipment did not present an immediate safety

concern to members of the public,” the letter says. The company appropriately performed investigations,

reviews and self-assessments in response, the letter says. NRC also conducted a supplemental inspection

last August to assess the adequacy of the licensee’s actions, and found the licensee’s response to the

incident satisfactory.

In addition, the letter notes: “As you are aware, since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001,

the NRC has issued several Orders and threat advisories to enhance security capabilities and improve guard

force readiness. We have conducted inspections to review your implementation of these requirements and

have monitored your actions in response to changing threat advisories. For calendar Year 2003, we plan
to continue these inspections and conduct portions of the security baseline inspection program, as well as

perform additional inspections to evaluate your compliance with new requirements that may be ordered.”

Current performance information for Fort Calhoun is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/FCS/fcs_chart.html

###