Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 27, 2004 / Notices 62729

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day 

of October 2004.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

J.E. Dyer, 

Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation.

[FR Doc. 04–24014 Filed 10–26–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. 030–06021] 

Notice of Availability of Environmental 

Assessment and Finding of No 

Significant Impact for License 

Amendment for Rohm and Haas 

Company’s Facility in Bristol, PA

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission.

ACTION: Notice of availability of 

Environmental Assessment and Finding 

of No Significant Impact. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marjorie McLaughlin, Nuclear Materials 

Safety Branch 2, Division of Nuclear 

Materials Safety, Region I, 475 

Allendale Road, King of Prussia, 

Pennsylvania, 19406, telephone (610) 

337–5240, fax (610) 337–5269; or by

e-mail: MMM3@NRC.GOV.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Introduction 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

(NRC) is issuing a license amendment to 

Rohm and Haas Company for Materials 

License No. 37–01665–01, to authorize 

release of its facility in Bristol, 

Pennsylvania for unrestricted use. NRC 

has prepared an Environmental 

Assessment (EA) in support of this 

action in accordance with the 

requirements of 10 CFR part 51. Based 

on the EA, the NRC has concluded that 

a Finding of No Significant Impact 

(FONSI) is appropriate. The amendment 

will be issued following the publication 

of this notice. 

II. EA Summary 

The purpose of the action is to 

authorize the release of the licensee’s 

Bristol, Pennsylvania facility for 

unrestricted use. Rohm and Haas 

Company was authorized by NRC from 

December 4, 1958, to use radioactive 

materials for research and development 

purposes at the Bristol, Pennsylvania 

site. On July 22, 2004, Rohm and Haas 

Company requested that NRC release 

the facility for unrestricted use. Rohm 

and Haas Company has conducted 

surveys of the facility and determined 

that the facility meets the license 

termination criteria in subpart E of 10 

CFR part 20. Rohm and Haas Company 

will continue licensed activities at other 

locations, as authorized by the license. 

The NRC staff has prepared an EA in 

support of the license amendment. The 

facility was remediated and surveyed 

prior to the licensee requesting the 

license amendment. The NRC staff has 

reviewed the information and final 

status survey submitted by Rohm and 

Haas. Based on its reviews, the staff has 

determined that there are no additional 

remediation activities necessary to 

complete the proposed action. 

Therefore, the staff considered the 

impact of the residual radioactivity at 

the facility and concluded that since the 

residual radioactivity meets the 

requirements in subpart E of 10 CFR 

part 20, a Finding of No Significant 

Impact is appropriate. 

III. Finding of No Significant Impact 

The staff has prepared the EA 

(summarized above) in support of the 

license amendment to release the 

facility for unrestricted use. The NRC 

staff has evaluated Rohm and Haas 

Company’s request and the results of the 

surveys and has concluded that the 

completed action complies with the 

criteria in subpart E of 10 CFR part 20. 

The staff has found that the 

environmental impacts from the action 

are bounded by the impacts evaluated 

by NUREG–1496, Volumes 1–3, 

‘‘Generic Environmental Impact 

Statement in Support of Rulemaking on 

Radiological Criteria for License 

Termination of NRC-Licensed 

Facilities’’ (ML042310492, 

ML042320379, and ML042330385). On 

the basis of the EA, the NRC has 

concluded that the environmental 

impacts from the action are expected to 

be insignificant and has determined not 

to prepare an environmental impact 

statement for the action. 

IV. Further Information 

Documents related to this action, 

including the application for the license 

amendment and supporting 

documentation, are available 

electronically at the NRC’s Electronic 

Reading Room at http://www.nrc.gov/

reading-rm/adams.html. From this site, 

you can access the NRC’s Agencywide 

Document Access and Management 

System (ADAMS), which provides text 

and image files of NRC’s public 

documents. The ADAMS accession 

numbers for the documents related to 

this Notice are: The Environmental 

Assessment (ML042880387), 

Amendment request and Final Status 

Survey results (ML042080055 and 

ML042220108), Additional Survey 

Information (ML042470162), Gas 

chromatograph source leak test results 

(ML042470170, ML042540075, and 

ML042540081) and additional 

information concerning the storage 

locker (ML042470164). Persons who do 

not have access to ADAMS or who 

encounter problems in accessing the 

documents located in ADAMS, should 

contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by 

telephone at (800) 397–4209 or (301) 

415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.

These documents may be viewed 

electronically at the NRC Public 

Document Room (PDR), O 1 F21, One 

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Rockville, MD, 20852. The PDR 

reproduction contractor will copy 

documents for a fee. The PDR is open 

from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except on Federal 

holidays.

Dated in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, 

this 20th day of October, 2004.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

John D. Kinneman, 

Chief, Materials Security and Industrial 

Branch, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, 

Region I.

[FR Doc. 04–24017 Filed 10–26–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

Proposed Generic Communication; 

Establishing and Maintaining a Safety 

Conscious Work Environment; 

Correction

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission.

ACTION: Notice of opportunity for public 

comment; correction. 

SUMMARY: This document corrects a 

notice appearing in the Federal Register

on October 14, 2004 (69 FR 61049), that 

requests public comment on a guidance 

document for licensees on establishing 

and maintaining a safety conscious 

work environment. This action is 

necessary to correct an erroneous Web 

site.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lisamarie Jarriel, Agency Allegations 

Advisor, Office of Enforcement, U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555–0001, (301) 415–

8529, email LLJ@nrc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On page 

61049, in the second column, in the 

second complete paragraph, in the last 

sentence, the Web site is corrected to 

read, ‘‘http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/

regulatory/allegations/scweguide.html.’’

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day 

of October 2004.

62730 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 27, 2004 / Notices 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.

3See October 8, 2004 letter from Jeffrey S. Davis, 

Associate General Counsel, Nasdaq, to Katherine A. 

England, Assistant Director, Division of Market 

Regulation (‘‘Division’’), Commission 

(‘‘Amendment No. 1’’). The original proposed rule 

change contained conflicting language about 

Nasdaq’s intent to make permanent the existing 

TotalView pilot program. In Amendment No. 1, 

Nasdaq clarified that the purpose of the proposed 

rule change is to make permanent the fees 

associated with TotalView that previously had been 

implemented on a pilot basis. The Commission also 

notes that the original proposed rule change was 

filed with a blank page between pages 13 and 14. 

Nasdaq confirmed that this was an error, and that 

no text is missing from the original proposed rule 

change. Telephone conversation between Jeffrey S. 

Davis, Nasdaq, and Joseph P. Morra, Commission, 

September 30, 2004.

4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).

5 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).

6Nasdaq provided the Commission with written 

notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change 

on September 21, 2004. See September 21, 2004 

letter from Jeffrey S. Davis, Nasdaq, to Katherine A. 

England, Commission. Nasdaq asked the 

Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay. 

For purposes of calculating the 60-day abrogation 

period, the Commission considers the period to 

have commenced on October 12, 2004, the date that 

Nasdaq filed Amendment No. 1. See Section 

19(b)(3)(A) of the Act, and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 

thereunder. 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1), 17 CFR 240.19b–

4(f)(6)(iii).

7Securities Exchange Act Release No. 46843 

(November 18, 2002), 67 FR 70471 (November 22, 

2002)(SR–NASD–2002–33).

8Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47477 

(March 10, 2003), 68 FR 13747 (March 20, 

2003)(SR–NASD–2003–27).

9Securities Exchange Act Release No. 48581 

(October 1, 2003), 68 FR 57945 (October 7, 

2003)(SR–NASD–2003–111).

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Michael T. Lesar, 

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 04–24015 Filed 10–26–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF 

GOVERNORS 

Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE AND TIMES: Thursday, November 4, 

2004; 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.

PLACE: Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal 

Service Headquarters, 475 L’Enfant 

Plaza, SW., in the Benjamin Franklin 

Room.

STATUS: November 4–10 a.m. (Closed); 3 

p.m. (Open).

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Thursday, November 4–10 a.m. (Closed) 

1. Financial Update. 

2. Proposed Filing with the Postal 

Rate Commission for Premium 

Forwarding Service. 

3. Rate Case Planning. 

4. Strategic Planning. 

5. Personnel Matters and 

Compensation Issues. 

Thursday, November 4—3 p.m. (Open) 

1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting, 

September 13 and 14, 2004. 

2. Remarks of the Postmaster General 

and CEO. 

3. Quarterly Report on Service 

Performance. 

4. Committee Reports. 

Thursday, November 4—3 p.m. (Open) 

[continued] 

5. Board of Governors Calendar Year 

2005 Meeting Schedule. 

6. Office of the Governors Fiscal Year 

2005 Budget. 

7. Capital Investment. 

a. Intelligent Mail Data Acquisition 

System. 

8. Tentative Agenda for the December 

7, 2004, meeting in Washington, DC.

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION: William T. Johnstone, 

Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal 

Service, 475 L’Enfant Plaza, SW., 

Washington, DC 20250–1000. 

Telephone (202) 268–4800.

William T. Johnstone, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 04–24080 Filed 10–22–04; 4:12 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7710–12–M

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–50571; File No. SR–NASD–

2004–146] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; 

National Association of Securities 

Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and 

Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed 

Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 to 

Permanently Adopt Fees for TotalView 

Product 

October 20, 2004. 

Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2

notice is hereby given that on 

September 30, 2004, the National 

Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. 

(‘‘NASD’’), through its subsidiary, The 

Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (‘‘Nasdaq’’), 

filed with the Securities and Exchange 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the 

proposed rule change as described in 

Items I and II, below, which Items have 

been prepared by Nasdaq. On October 

12, 2004, Nasdaq filed an amendment to 

the proposal.3 Nasdaq filed the 

proposed rule change pursuant to 

section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 4 and Rule 

19b–4(f)(6) thereunder,5 which renders 

it effective upon filing with the 

Commission.6 The Commission is 

publishing this notice to solicit 

comments on the proposed rule change, 

as amended, from interested persons.

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

Nasdaq proposes to adopt 

permanently the TotalView data 

package and reduced fees assessed for 

those feeds. The proposed rule change 

will make permanent the pilot program 

that was in effect without making any 

substantive changes to the way the pilot 

has been operating. The text of the 

proposed rule change is available at 

NASD and at the Commission. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, 

Nasdaq included statements concerning 

the purpose of, and basis for, the 

proposed rule change and discussed any 

comments it received on the proposed 

rule change. The text of these statements 

may be examined at the places specified 

in Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared 

summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, 

and C below, of the most significant 

aspects of such statements. 

A.Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

In November 2002, the Commission 

approved a proposed rule change that 

established fees assessed for several 

products known as ‘‘ViewSuite,’’ which 

contain data from Nasdaq’s integrated 

quotation and execution system.7 To 

encourage the broadest possible display 

of the Nasdaq market center data 

contained in the ViewSuite products, 

Nasdaq then proposed an optional pilot 

program to offer an enterprise-wide 

license to distributors.8 This pilot 

allowed each distributor to provide a 

ViewSuite product to large numbers of 

subscribers for a fixed rate based upon 

a multiple of the incremental cost of the 

ViewSuite product and the size of that 

distributor’s reported subscriber base.

To support broad dissemination of the 

data and understanding by its 

customers, Nasdaq subsequently 

simplified and reduced the pricing for 

ViewSuite on a pilot basis.9 For the oneyear pilot, Nasdaq offered subscribers a