alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 103.31a Advance electronic information for air, truck, and rail cargo; Importer Security Filing information for vessel cargo. The following types of advance electronic information are *per se* exempt from disclosure as either trade secrets or privileged or confidential commercial or financial information, unless CBP receives a specific request for such records pursuant to 6 CFR 5.3, and the owner of the information expressly agrees in writing to its release: ( a ) Advance cargo information that is electronically presented to Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for inbound or outbound air, rail, or truck cargo in accordance with § 122.48a, § 123.91, § 123.92, or § 192.14 of this chapter;
( b ) Importer Security Filing information that is electronically presented to CBP for inbound vessel cargo in accordance with § 149.2 of this chapter;
( c ) Vessel stow plan information that is electronically presented to CBP for inbound vessels in accordance with § 4.7c of this chapter; and
( d ) Container status message information that is electronically presented for inbound containers in accordance with § 4.7d of this chapter.
[CBP Dec. 08-46, 73 FR 71780, Nov. 25, 2008, as amended by CBP Dec. 15-16, 80 FR 71692, Nov. 17, 2015]
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93021, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 151.24 Unlading facilities for bulk sugar.

When dutiable sugar is to be imported in bulk, a full description of the facilities to be used in unlading the sugar shall be submitted to the Commissioner of Customs as far as possible in advance of the date of importation, and special instructions will be issued as to the methods to be applied in weighing and sampling such sugar.
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation (the Company),
hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    WILLIAM V. CAREYWilliam V. Carey Chairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 2, 2009
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 807 

To permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17 (legislative day, MARCH 16), 2021 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cameras in the Court5 room Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 28. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 45 of title 28, United 

8 States Code, is amended by inserting at the end the fol9 lowing: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 807 IS

1 ‘‘§ 678. Televising Supreme Court proceedings 

2 ‘‘The Supreme Court shall permit television coverage 

3 of all open sessions of the Court unless the Court decides, 

4 by a vote of the majority of justices, that allowing such 

5 coverage in a particular case would constitute a violation 

6 of the due process rights of 1 or more of the parties before 

7 the Court.’’. 

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The chapter analysis 

9 for chapter 45 of title 28, United States Code, is amended 

10 by inserting at the end the following: 

‘‘678. Televising Supreme Court proceedings.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
### §68–4. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 68–4 was editorially reclassified as section 6615 of this title.
§ 191.33 Person entitled to claim drawback. ( a ) *Direct identification.* ( 1 ) Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1), the exporter (or destroyer) shall be entitled to claim drawback.
( 2 ) The exporter or destroyer may waive the right to claim drawback and assign such right to the importer or any intermediate party. A drawback claimant under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1) other than the exporter or destroyer shall secure and retain a certification signed by the exporter or destroyer that such party waived the right to claim drawback, and did not and will not authorize any other party to claim the exportation or destruction for drawback (see § 191.82 of this part). The certification provided for under this section may be a blanket certification for a stated period. The claimant shall file such certification at the time of, or prior to, the filing of the claim(s) covered by the certification.
( b ) *Substitution.* ( 1 ) Under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2), the following parties may claim drawback: ( i ) In situations where the exporter or destroyer of the substituted merchandise is also the importer of the imported merchandise, that party shall be entitled to claim drawback.
( ii ) In situations where the exporter or destroyer receives from the person who imported and paid the duty on the imported merchandise a certificate of delivery documenting the transfer of imported merchandise, commercially interchangeable merchandise, or any combination of imported and commercially interchangeable merchandise, and exports or destroys such transferred merchandise, that exporter or destroyer shall be entitled to claim drawback. (Any such transferred merchandise, regardless of its origin, will be treated as imported merchandise for purposes of drawback under § 1313(j)(2), and any retained merchandise will be treated as domestic merchandise.)
( iii ) In situations where the transferred merchandise described in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section is the subject of further transfer(s), such transfer(s) shall be documented by certificate(s) of delivery, and the exporter or destroyer shall be entitled to claim drawback (multiple substitutions are not permitted).
( 2 ) The exporter or destroyer may waive the right to claim drawback and assign such right to the importer or to any intermediate party, provided that the claimant had possession of the substituted merchandise prior to its exportation or destruction. A drawback claimant under 19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(2) other than the exporter or destroyer shall secure and retain a certification signed by the exporter or destroyer that such party waived the right to claim drawback, and did not and will not authorize any other party to claim the exportation or destruction for drawback (see § 191.82 of this part). The certification provided for under this section may be a blanket certification for a stated period. The claimant shall file such certification at the time of, or prior to, the filing of the claim(s) covered by the certification.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         338,990
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  865,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,000
<INVENTORY>                                    778,939
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,041,911
<PP&E>                                       8,174,165
<DEPRECIATION>                                 435,841
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,117,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,371,927
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         10
<COMMON>                                         1,812
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,904,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,117,991
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               630,661
<CGS>                                          480,214
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  849,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               128,939
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             119,103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (828,340)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (828,340)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (823,340)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.047)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.047)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of New Energy Systems Group, (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jufeng Chen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: October 5, 2011


By:
/s/ Jufeng ChenJufeng ChenChief Financial Officer
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Health Physics Questions and Answers - Question 42

**Question 42:** A nuclear medicine technologist becomes contaminated with I-131 which results in an internal uptake of iodine. She continues to breast-feed her baby. Is the licensee responsible for controlling the dose to the baby as a member of the public in an unrestricted area? If so, what are the dose limits?

**Answer:** The licensee is responsible for the licensed material that has internally contaminated the technologist. The limit for a member of the public applies to the baby.

(References: 10 CFR 20.1201 and 20.1301)

The licensee is responsible for performing a "survey" to assess the magnitude of the dose to the baby [10 CFR 20.1501 (a)].

With respect to the continued breast-feeding of the baby, there are important legal, moral, and ethical considerations (including the rights of the technologist) that are outside the limited scope of 10 CFR Part 20. Both NRC and the licensee would have to address these considerations if such a situation were actually to arise.

(References: 10 CFR 20.1201 and 20.1301)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, December 12, 2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GLOBAL
INDUSTRIES, LTD'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           11773
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    99601
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                137302
<PP&E>                                          507119
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  684883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            71179
<BONDS>                                         189683
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           919
<OTHER-SE>                                      382735
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    684883
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 92158
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    61571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1151
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  22814
<INCOME-TAX>                                      7985
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              14829
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     14829
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
#### § 112.41 Identification cards required.

A port director may require each licensed cartman or lighterman and each employee thereof who receives, transports, or otherwise handles imported merchandise which has not been released from Customs custody to carry and display upon request of a Customs officer an identification card issued by Customs. The card shall be in the possession of the person in whose name it is issued at all times when he is engaged in transactions with respect to imported merchandise. An identification card shall not be issued to any person whose employment in connection with the transportation of bonded merchandise will, in the judgment of the port director, endanger the revenue.

[T.D. 73-140, 38 FR 13551, May 23, 1973, as amended by T.D. 99-64, 64 FR 43266, Aug. 10, 1999]
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93024, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 173.4 Correction of clerical error, mistake of fact, or inadvertence. ( a ) *Authority to review and correct entries of merchandise made, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, before December 18, 2004.* Even though a valid protest was not filed, the Center director, upon timely application and for entries of merchandise made, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, before December 18, 2004, may correct pursuant to section 520(c)(1), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, a clerical error, mistake of fact, or other inadvertence meeting the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, by reliquidation or other appropriate action. ( 1 ) *Transactions that may be corrected.* Correction may be made to any entry, liquidation, or other customs transaction made before December 18, 2004, if the clerical error, mistake of fact, or other inadvertence: ( i ) Does not amount to an error in the construction of a law;
( ii ) Is adverse to the importer; and
( iii ) Is manifest from the record or established by documentary evidence.
( 2 ) *Limitation on time for application.* A clerical error, mistake of fact, or other inadvertence meeting the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section must be brought to the attention of the Center director or other appropriate CBP officer within 1 year after the date of liquidation or exaction. The party requesting reliquidation under this section must state, to the best of his or her knowledge, whether the entry for which correction is requested is the subject of a drawback claim, or whether the entry has been referenced on a certificate of delivery or certificate of manufacture and delivery so as to enable a party to make such entry the subject of drawback (*see* §§ 181.50(b) and 191.81(b) of this chapter).
( b ) *Entries of merchandise made, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after December 18, 2004.* For merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after December 18, 2004, CBP does not have the authority, in situations where a valid protest has not been filed, to reliquidate an entry to correct a clerical error, mistake of fact, or other inadvertence. For merchandise entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on or after December 18, 2004, and except as provided for in sections 501 (relating to voluntary reliquidations), 516 (relating to petitions by domestic interested parties), and 520 (related to refunds) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, a CBP decision involving any clerical error, mistake of fact, or other inadvertence, whether or not resulting from or contained in an electronic submission, that is adverse to the importer in any entry, liquidation or reliquidation, may be corrected by protest only. *See* 19 CFR 174.11.
( c ) *“Liquidation” includes reliquidation.* “Liquidation,” as used in this section, includes reliquidation of an entry.
[CBP Dec. 11-02, 76 FR 2577, Jan. 14, 2011]
§ 111.53 Grounds for suspension or revocation of license or permit. The appropriate CBP officer may initiate proceedings for the suspension, for a specific period of time, or revocation of the license or permit of any broker for any of the following reasons: ( a ) The broker has made or caused to be made in any application for any license or permit under this part, or report filed with CBP, any statement which was, at the time and in light of the circumstances under which it was made, false or misleading with respect to any material fact, or has omitted to state in any application or report any material fact which was required;
( b ) The broker has been convicted, at any time after the filing of an application for a license under § 111.12, of any felony or misdemeanor which: ( 1 ) Involved the importation or exportation of merchandise;
( 2 ) Arose out of the conduct of customs business; or
( 3 ) Involved larceny, theft, robbery, extortion, forgery, counterfeiting, fraudulent concealment, embezzlement, fraudulent conversion, or misappropriation of funds;
( c ) The broker has violated any provision of any law enforced by CBP or the rules or regulations issued under any provision of any law enforced by CBP;
( d ) The broker has counseled, commanded, induced, procured, or knowingly aided or abetted the violations by any other person of any provision of any law enforced by CBP or the rules or regulations issued under any provision of any law enforced by CBP;
( e ) The broker has knowingly employed, or continues to employ, any person who has been convicted of a felony, without written approval of that employment from the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade,;
( f ) The broker has, in the course of customs business, with intent to defraud, in any manner willfully and knowingly deceived, misled or threatened any client or prospective client;
( g ) The broker has been convicted of committing or conspiring to commit an act of terrorism as described in section 2332b of title 18, United States Code; or
( h ) The broker no longer meets the applicable requirements of §§ 111.11 and 111.19.
[T.D. 00-17, 65 FR 13891, Mar. 15, 2000, as amended by CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63319, Oct. 18, 2022]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 4, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00072

- CV

JMI CONTRACTORS, LLC

, Appellant

v.

Jose Manuel MEDELLIN

, Appellee

From the 285th Judicial Dis trict Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- CI

- 05983

Honorable Aaron Haas , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellee’s brief was due by September 29, 2022. On September 28, 2022, appellee filed an unopposed motion seeking an extension of time until November 1, 2022 to file his brief. After consideration, we grant the motion and order appellee’s brief due by November 1, 2022

.

_________________________________ L uz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 4th day of October, 2022

.

______________________________ _____ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
August 8, 2016

Mr. Philip Klassen

AeroHawk Technologies LLC

2854 West 2200 South

Aberdeen, ID 83210

Re: FAA–2015–8015

Dear Mr. Klassen:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition. 

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption. 

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
March 31, 2004, of Synagro Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
C. Boucher, Jr., certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company and that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                                 /s/ Robert C. Boucher, Jr.
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Robert C. Boucher, Jr.

                                                 March 21, 2005
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-67 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of ImageMax, Inc. of our report dated March 22, 2002, except Note 6 and Note 7
as to which the date is April 12, 2002, included in the 2001 Annual Report to
Shareholders of ImageMax, Inc.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-46463 and 333-54202) of ImageMax, Inc. of our report dated
March 22, 2002, except for Note 5, 6 and Note 7 as to which the date is April
12, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of ImageMax,
Inc.


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
April 15, 2002