alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 145 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 10
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 145

                          [Report No. 108-30]

To designate the Federal building located at 290 Broadway in New York, 
            New York, as the ``Ted Weiss Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

  Mr. Nadler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                             March 10, 2003

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building located at 290 Broadway in New York, 
            New York, as the ``Ted Weiss Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

     The Federal building located at 290 Broadway in New York, New 
York, shall be known and designated as the ``Ted Weiss Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

     Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ted Weiss Federal 
Building''.

                                                  House Calendar No. 10

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 145

                          [Report No. 108-30]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 290 Broadway in New York, 
            New York, as the ``Ted Weiss Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 10, 2003

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1:20-cv-23381-UU

ORDER RESETTING INITIAL PLANNING AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

The Initial Planning and Scheduling Conference is hereby RE-SET to Friday, November 20, 

2020, at 10:00 a.m. It is further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Unopposed Motion to Reschedule the Initial 

Planning and Scheduling Conference, D.E. 13, is GRANTED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this _18th__ day of September, 

2020. 

________________________________ 

URSULA UNGARO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Copies provided: 

Counsel of record via CM/ECF 

CORAL CASTLE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

EPIC GAMES, INC.,

Defendant.

Case 1:20-cv-23381-UU Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/18/2020 Page 1 of 1
NOT. RE: CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN RE: FEG, INC.



  
 EXHIBIT 10.6 
  

NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP 
  
 Section 11(a) of the
Securities Act provides that if part of a registration statement at the time it becomes effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact, or omits a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not
misleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant to such registration statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person knew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claim against, among others, an accountant who
has consented to be named as having certified any part of the registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in connection with the registration statement. 
  
 On April 16, 2002, Fox Entertainment Group, Inc. (“FEG”) dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP as its independent auditors. On April 16, 2002, FEG appointed Ernst & Young LLP to replace Arthur
Andersen LLP as the independent auditor of FEG. Prior to the date of filing by The News Corporation Limited (the “Company”) of this Form 20-F (which is incorporated by reference into various registration statements (the “Registration
Statements”) related to securities of the Company), the Arthur Andersen partner responsible for the audit of the financial statements of FEG for the years ended June 30, 2000 and 2001 resigned from Arthur Andersen. As a result, after reasonable
efforts, the Company has been unable to obtain Arthur Andersen’s written consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statements of its audit reports with respect to FEG’s financial statements for the years ended June
30, 2000 and 2001. Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act permits the Company to file this Form 20-F without a written consent from Arthur Andersen. However, as a result, Arthur Andersen will not have any liability under
Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact contained in the financial statements audited by Andersen LLP or any omissions of a material fact required to be stated therein. Accordingly, you would be unable to
assert a claim against Arthur Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act because it has not consented to the incorporation by reference of its previously issued reports into the Registration Statements.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-127 November 7, 2001

NRC APPROVES POWER UPRATE

FOR DUANE ARNOLD NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a request by Nuclear Management Company 

 to increase the generating capacity of the Duane Arnold nuclear power plant by about 15.3 percent,

or 80 megawatts.

The power uprate at the plant, near Cedar Rapids, Iowa, will increase the generating capacity of

the reactor to about 600 megawatts of electricity. The facility intends to implement the power increase

immediately. The application for the increase in power was submitted to the NRC on November 16,

2000.

The NRC's safety evaluation of the requested power uprate for the plant focused on several

areas, including nuclear steam supply systems, instrumentation and control systems, electrical systems,

accident evaluations, radiological consequences, operations and technical specification changes. The

NRC staff determined that the licensee could safely increase the power output of the reactor with

replacement of the main transformer and other modifications to plant equipment.

 ###
§ 108.460 Restrictions on Common Control or ownership of two (or more) NMVC Companies. Without SBA's prior written approval, you must not have an officer, director, manager, Control Person, or owner (with a direct or indirect ownership interest of at least 10 percent) who is also: ( a ) An officer, director, manager, Control Person, or owner (with a direct or indirect ownership interest of at least 10 percent) of another NMVC Company; or
( b ) An officer or director of any Person that directly or indirectly controls, or is controlled by, or is under Common Control with, another NMVC Company.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Peabodys Coffee Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacities  and on the date  indicted  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:


     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          materials  respects,  the financial condition and results of operation
          of the Company.



July 15, 2003                  By: /s/ Todd Tkachuk
                                   ---------------------------
                                   Todd Tkachuk
                                   President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                   Chief Financial Officer
### §1349. Adverse personnel actions

(a) An officer or employee of the United States Government or of the District of Columbia government violating section 1341(a) or 1342 of this title shall be subject to appropriate administrative discipline including, when circumstances warrant, suspension from duty without pay or removal from office.

(b) An officer or employee who willfully uses or authorizes the use of a passenger motor vehicle or aircraft owned or leased by the United States Government (except for an official purpose authorized by section 1344 of this title) or otherwise violates section 1344 shall be suspended without pay by the head of the agency. The officer or employee shall be suspended for at least one month, and when circumstances warrant, for a longer period or summarily removed from office.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 926.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1349(a) | 31:665(i)(1)(words before semicolon related to (a), (b)). | R.S. §3679(i)(1)(words before semicolon related to (a), (b)); Mar. 3, 1905, ch. 1484, §4(1st par.), 33 Stat. 1257; Feb. 27, 1906, ch. 510, §3, 34 Stat. 48; restated Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 896, §1211, 64 Stat. 768. |
| 1349(b) | 31:638a(c)(2)(2d sentence). | July 16, 1914, ch. 141, §5(c)(2)(2d sentence), 38 Stat. 508; restated Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 744, §16(a), 60 Stat. 810. |

In subsection (a), the words "In addition to any penalty or liability under other law" are omitted as surplus. The words "District of Columbia government" are added because of section 47–105 of the D.C. Code.

In subsection (b), the words "of the Government" and "from duty" are omitted as unnecessary because of the restatement. The word "pay" is substituted for "compensation" for consistency. The word "agency" is substituted for "department" because of section 101 of the revised title and for consistency.
§ 148.16 Amendment of declaration. ( a ) *Before examination.* A passenger shall be permitted to add an article to his declaration if, before examination of his baggage has begun, the fact that the article has not been declared is brought to the attention of the examining officer by the passenger.
( b ) *After examination is begun.* A passenger shall be permitted to add an article to his declaration after examination of his baggage has begun if, before any undeclared article is found, the passenger advises the examining officer that he has such an article and the officer is satisfied that there was no fraudulent intent. Under no circumstances shall a passenger be permitted to add any undeclared article to his declaration after such article has been discovered by the examining officer.
| Water Resources of IdahoLow Streamflow Conditions in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho During Water Year 2001*by Jon E. Hortness**Water Resources-Investigations Report 03-4071*

This document was created as a PDFdocument.  It can be viewed withAcrobat 3.0 or higher.
***VIEW REPORT (3981K)******VIEW FIGURES (4219K)***
This report documents low streamflows at several ungaged locations on streams in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho; provides comparisons between water year 2001 and historical streamflow data at several long-term gaging stations; and relates miscellaneous low-flow measurements from water year 2001 to measurements from water year 1977 (commonly considered the drought year of record in the region).  Precipitation and temperature data are used for comparing 2001 data to long-term data.  The effects of low steamflows on reservoir storages and ground-water levels also are discussed.
If you encounter problems viewing this report please contact Linda Channel by phone at (208)387-1305 or email at lchannel@usgs.gov.
For copies of this report, you can obtain ordering information from the U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services, Box 25286, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225 (1-888-275-8747), or send email to infoservices@usgs.gov.
|Idaho District||USGS||Water||Biology||Geology||Mapping||Search||*Help!*|U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological SurveyMaintainer:  Idaho WebmasterLast update: 13:45:51 Fri 23 Jan 2004	      Privacy Statement || Disclaimer || AccessibilityURL: http://id.water.usgs.gov/PDF/wri034071/ |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 1201.27 Class appeals. ( a ) *Appeal.* One or more employees may file an appeal as representatives of a class of employees. The judge will hear the case as a class appeal if he or she finds that a class appeal is the fairest and most efficient way to adjudicate the appeal and that the representative of the parties will adequately protect the interests of all parties. When a class appeal is filed, the time from the filing date until the judge issues his or her decision under paragraph (b) of this section is not counted in computing the time limit for individual members of the potential class to file individual appeals.
( b ) *Procedure.* The judge will consider the appellant's request and any opposition to that request, and will issue an order within 30 days after the appeal is filed stating whether the appeal is to be heard as a class appeal. If the judge denies the request, the appellants affected by the decision may file individual appeals within 30 days after the date of receipt of the decision denying the request to be heard as a class appeal. Each individual appellant is responsible for either filing an individual appeal within the original time limit, or keeping informed of the status of a class appeal and, if the class appeal is denied, filing an individual appeal within the additional 35-day period.
( c ) *Standards.* In determining whether it is appropriate to treat an appeal as a class action, the judge will be guided but not controlled by the applicable provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
( d ) *Electronic filing.* A request to hear a case as a class appeal and any opposition thereto may not be filed in electronic form. Subsequent pleadings may be filed and served in electronic form, provided that the requirements of § 1201.14 are satisfied.
[54 FR 53504, Dec. 29, 1989, as amended at 59 FR 31109, June 17, 1994; 62 FR 59992, Nov. 6, 1997; 68 FR 59862, Oct. 20, 2003; 69 FR 57630, Sept. 27, 2004]
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone 301/415-820

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-076 June 10, 2003

NRC STAFF ISSUES BULLETIN ON

REACTOR CONTAINMENT SUMP BLOCKAGE ISSUE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued a Bulletin to licensees operating

pressurized water reactors (PWR), requesting information on how licensees are dealing with the

potential for post-accident debris blocking a water recirculation sump.

 Operating experience at boiling water reactors, as well as recent research, has indicated

post-accident debris could block PWR containment building sumps, which help provide water for

cooling the reactor core and containment in an accident. Licensees have 60 days to respond to the

Bulletin with one of two responses:

1) Confirming their recirculation systems comply with regulations in light of the most

recent findings, or

2) Describing interim compensatory measures that have been (or will be) implemented to

reduce the risk of debris blockage until a compliance evaluation can be completed.

The Bulletin includes examples of compensatory measures to deal with this issue. The NRC staff

plans to hold a public meeting in late June to further explain the rationale for issuing the Bulletin. 

Meeting details will be published as soon as they are available.

NRC staff also plans to issue a Generic Letter on the sump blockage issue to address

longer-term corrective actions. The letter, which will undergo a public comment period, will

request more information on what evaluations PWR licensees may find necessary to ensure their

recirculation systems comply with regulations.

The Bulletin is available electronically through the NRC’s Agencywide Documents

Access and Management System (ADAMS) on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html , by entering accession number 

ML031600259, and will be available at the web site’s Bulletins page at:
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/gen-comm/bulletins/2003/ . Help in using

ADAMS is available from the NRC’s Public Document Room at 800/397-4209 or

301/415-4737.

###
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1478

To provide that private land use rules be treated as State or local regulation 

for purposes of certain Federal Communications Commission regulations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2003

Mr. ISRAEL (for himself, Mr. WALDEN of Oregon, Mr. ROSS, Mr. TIBERI, Mr. 

BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. BERRY, Ms. BALDWIN, Mrs. MCCARTHY of 

New York, Mr. MOORE, Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, Mrs. JO ANN

DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. MCNULTY, and Mr. HALL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

A BILL

To provide that private land use rules be treated as State 

or local regulation for purposes of certain Federal Communications Commission regulations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Amateur Radio Emer5 gency Communications Consistency Act’’. 
2

•HR 1478 IH 

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF PRIVATE LAND USE RULES AS 

2 LOCAL REGULATION. 

3 For purposes of the Federal Communications Com4 mission’s regulation relating to station antenna structures 

5 in the amateur radio services (47 CFR 97.15), any private 

6 land use rules applicable to such structures shall be treat7 ed as a State or local regulation and shall be subject to 

8 the same requirements and limitations as a State or local 

9 regulation.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 16, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Steel Deck Institute (“SDI”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

                    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Steel Deck Institute, Fox River Grove, IL. The nature and scope of SDI's standards development activities are: To provide uniform industry standards for the engineering, design, manufacture                           ( print page 62295)                        and field usage of steel roof decks, composite floor decks and non-composite steel floor decks.                

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-23779  Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### § 190.158 Procedures.

When the drawback claim has been completed and the bill of lading filed, the reports of inspection and lading made, and the clearance of the exporting conveyance established by the record of clearance in the case of direct exportation or by certificate in the case of transportation and exportation, the drawback office will verify the importation by referring to the import records to ascertain the amount of duty paid on the merchandise exported. To the extent appropriate and not inconsistent with the provisions of this subpart, drawback entries will be liquidated in accordance with the provisions of § 190.81.