alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Chris Biedermann, Chief Financial Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Central European
Distribution Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this
annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



Date: February 4, 2005



|    |  |                                                                       
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Chris Biedermann                                                  
|    |  | Chris Biedermann Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
### §1835. Interagency details

#### (a) Authorizing details of employees under joint agency agreements

In addition to any other authority relating to the detail of employees, the Architect of the Capitol and the head of any other department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States Government may enter into a joint agency agreement under which—

(1) employees of the Office of the Architect of the Capitol (including employees of the United States Botanic Garden) may be detailed to such department, agency, or instrumentality on a reimbursable or non-reimbursable basis; and

(2) employees of such department, agency, or instrumentality may be detailed to the Office of the Architect of the Capitol on a reimbursable or non-reimbursable basis.

#### (b) Duration

The detail of an employee under a joint agency agreement under this section shall be for such duration as may be provided in the agreement, except that in the case of a detail made on a non-reimbursable basis, the duration of the detail may not exceed one year unless the Architect of the Capitol and the head of the department, agency, or instrumentality involved each determine that an extension of the detail of the employee is in the public interest.

#### (c) No effect on appropriations of recipient of non-reimbursable detail

For purposes of any law, rule, or regulation, the detail of an employee on a non-reimbursable basis under a joint agency agreement under this section for a fiscal year shall not be treated as an increase or modification of the appropriation for the fiscal year of the office to whom the employee is detailed.

#### (d) Effective date

This section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2019 and each succeeding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 115–244, div. B, title I, §134, Sept. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 2936.)
EXHIBIT 21



MPW INDUSTRIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                           |  |                             
|------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------
|NAME                                       |  | JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION
|                                           | 
|Aquatech Environmental, Inc.               |  | Michigan                    
|                                           | 
|MPW Industrial Cleaning Corp.              |  | Ohio                        
|                                           | 
|MPW Industrial Services of Indiana, LLC    |  | Indiana                     
|                                           | 
|MPW Industrial Services, Inc.              |  | Ohio                        
|                                           | 
|MPW Management Services Corp.              |  | Ohio                        
|                                           | 
|MPW Container Management Corp.             |  | Ohio                        
|                                           | 
|MPW Container Management Corp. of Michigan |  | Michigan                    
|                                           | 
|MPW Industrial Services, Ltd.              |  | Canada                      
|                                           | 
|MPW Industrial Water Services, Inc.        |  | Ohio
###### Editorial Note on Part 174

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 174 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93025, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 174.29 Allowance or denial of protests.

The Center director shall allow or deny in whole or in part a protest filed in accordance with section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 1514) within 2 years from the date the protest was filed. If the protest is allowed in whole or in part the Center director shall remit or refund any duties, charge, or exaction found to have been collected in excess, or pay any drawback found due. If a protest of an exporter or producer under § 174.12(a)(5) of this part is allowed in whole or in part, any monies found to have been collected in excess shall be refunded to the party who paid the monies even if such party did not file an appropriate and timely protest under this part. If the protest is denied in whole or in part the Center director shall give notice of the denial in the form and manner prescribed in § 174.30.

[T.D. 70-181, 35 FR 13429, Aug. 22, 1970, as amended by T.D. 94-1, 58 FR 69472, Dec. 30, 1993]
### §5106. Allowance for compensation of interns in House leadership offices

#### (a) Establishment

There is established for the House of Representatives an allowance which shall be available for the compensation of interns who serve in House leadership offices.

#### (b) Benefit exclusion

Section 5321(b) of this title shall apply with respect to an intern who is compensated under the allowance under this section in the same manner as such section applies with respect to an intern who is compensated under the Members' Representational Allowance.

#### (c) Definitions

In this section—

(1) the term "House leadership office" means, with respect to a fiscal year, any office for which the appropriation for salaries and expenses of the office for the fiscal year is provided under the heading "House Leadership Offices" in the Act making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year; and

(2) term "intern", with respect to a House leadership office, has the meaning given such term with respect to a Member of the House of Representatives in section 5321(c)(2) of this title.

#### (d) Appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2020 and each succeeding fiscal year.

#### (e) Omitted

#### (f) Effective date

This section and the amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2020 and each succeeding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 116–94, div. E, title I, §113, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2759.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 113 of Pub. L. 116–94. Subsec. (e) of section 113 of Pub. L. 116–94 amended section 5507 of this title.
§ 190.133 Explanation of terms. ( a ) *Materials.* Section 313(g) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(g)), applies only to materials used in the original construction and equipment of vessels and aircraft, or to materials used in a “major conversion,” as defined in this section, of a vessel or aircraft. Section 313(g) does not apply to materials used for alteration or repair, or to materials not required for safe operation of the vessel or aircraft.
( b ) *Foreign account and ownership.* Foreign account and ownership, as used in section 313(g) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(g)), means only vessels or aircraft built or equipped for the account of an owner or owners residing in a foreign country and having a bona fide intention that the vessel or aircraft, when completed, will be owned and operated under the flag of a foreign country.
( c ) *Major conversion.* For purposes of this subpart, a “major conversion” means a conversion that substantially changes the dimensions or carrying capacity of the vessel or aircraft, changes the type of the vessel or aircraft, substantially prolongs the life of the vessel or aircraft, or otherwise so changes the vessel or aircraft that it is essentially a new vessel or aircraft, as determined by CBP (*see* 46 U.S.C. 2101(14a)).
|  |
|--|

|  |  |
|--|--|

| ** ** |
|------------|

|   | ****Arthur Flegenheimer**** 
Arthur Flegenheimer, alias, Dutch Schultz was wanted in 1934 for Income Tax Evasion. He was a fugitive from justice. On October 23, 1935, Schultz and three associates were shot by rival gangsters in a Newark, New Jersey restaurant. Schultz's death started rival gang wars amongst the hoodlum and/or underworld gangs. 
Part 1 Part 2 Part 3Part 4 Part 5 
  

Introduction
Reading Room Index - A   B   C   D   E    F   G- H   I    J    K   L   M   N   -O   P   Q   R   S   T   U-V   W   X   Y   Z   
Electronic Reading Room
- Alphabetical Listing- Espionage-Famous Persons-Gangster Era- Historical Interest- Unusual Phenomena-Violent CrimeFBI              File Fact Sheet FOIA Request Instructions- FOIA Request Form - Privacy Waiver and Certificate of Identity Form Privacy Act Instructions- Privacy Act Request FormDOJ              Reference GuideU.S.              DOJ FOIASearch
All of these publications are in PDF (Portable Document Format). To view them you will need to have the Adobe Acrobat Reader plug-in installed on your computer. The Reader can be downloaded at no cost from Adobe's site on the World Wide Web.   If you have difficulty accessing any material on this site because of a disability, please contact us in writing or via telephone and we will work with you to make the information available.

Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Section    202-324-5520 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### George E. Fleming v. Jessie B. Bacon.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §197. Compensation of employees

The rate of compensation for any position under the appropriations now available for, or hereafter made for, expenses of inquiries and investigations of the Senate or expenses of special and select committees of the House of Representatives shall not exceed the rates fixed under chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5, for positions with comparable duties; and the salary limitations of $3,600 attached to appropriations heretofore made for expenses of inquiries and investigations of the Senate or for expenses of special and select committees of the House of Representatives are repealed.

(Feb. 9, 1937, ch. 9, title I, §1, 50 Stat. 9; Oct. 28, 1949, ch. 782, title XI, §1106(a), 63 Stat. 972.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"Chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5" substituted in text for "the Classification Act of 1949" on authority of section 7(b) of Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 631, section 1 of which enacted Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Amendments

1949—Act Oct. 28, 1949, substituted "Classification Act of 1949" for "Classification Act of 1923".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeals

Act Oct. 28, 1949, ch. 782, cited as a credit to this section, was repealed (subject to a savings clause) by Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, §8, 80 Stat. 632, 655.
458 P.2d 231

#### Paul MARSHALL, Petitioner, v. E. T. JOHNSON, Respondent.

No. 8899.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Aug. 15, 1969.

Ordered that petition for writ of prohibition be and the same is hereby denied.
EXHIBIT 8.1
 LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES
 1.
    
    Lorenzo Jewelry Limited, a Hong Kong corporation2.
    
    Lorenzo Jewellery (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., a PRC corporation3.
    
    Shenzhen PGS Jewelry Mfg., a PRC corporation4.
    
    Lorenzo (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.5.
    
    Lorenzo Crystal Ltd., a Hong Kong corporation6.
    
    Enzo (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., a PRC corporation7.
    
    Enzo Ltd., a Macau corporation8.
    
    Goldleaves Gems (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., a PRC corporation
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-50 July 11, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING IN WATERFORD, CONN.,

ON CHANGES IN REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a joint meeting with Connecticut’s Nuclear

Energy Advisory Council on Thursday, July 20, at which the NRC staff will explain the agency’s new

reactor oversight process.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. at Town Hall in Waterford, Conn., which is home to the

Millstone Nuclear Power Station. Waterford Town Hall is located at 15 Rope Ferry Road.

Members of the public will have the opportunity to ask questions of NRC staff during and after the

meeting. In addition, Northeast Utilities, which operates the plant, plans to make a presentation during

the meeting regarding performance indicators in use at Millstone in conjunction with the new oversight

process.

The new oversight process uses more objective, timely and safety-significant criteria in

assessing performance while seeking to more effectively and efficiently regulate the industry. Under

the new process, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional office-based personnel are

supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance indicators. These

performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant operations, including the viability of

redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection and security measures.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC’s web site every three months. The safety significance of each inspection finding or performance

indicator is characterized by a color -- green, white, yellow or red.

The NRC response to the inspection finding and performance indicators will be based on the

significance of the items. A green finding receives normal NRC oversight, while white, yellow or red

assessments receive increasing NRC involvement. Multiple red findings could result in a plant

shutdown.

A plain language summary of the reactor oversight process is available from the NRC Office of

Public Affairs or on the web site at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm
Detailed information regarding the reactor oversight process is available on the web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html

The Nuclear Energy Advisory Council, whose members were appointed by the state

Legislature, was established to, among other things, keep state officials and citizens apprised of safety

issues relating to nuclear power plants in Connecticut.

#
### §6516. Sale of waste paper and condemned furniture

It shall be the duty of the Secretary and Sergeant at Arms of the Senate to cause to be sold all waste paper and useless documents and condemned furniture that may accumulate, in their respective departments or offices, under the direction of the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate and cover the proceeds thereof into the Treasury.

(Aug. 7, 1882, ch. 433, §1, 22 Stat. 337; May 29, 1928, ch. 901, §1(122), 45 Stat. 995; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §204(62), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1739.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 117 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 struck out "Clerk and Doorkeeper of the House of Representatives and the" before "Secretary and" and substituted "direction of the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate and cover" for "direction of the Committee on Accounts of their respective houses and cover".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Report on Sales Discontinued

Act May 29, 1928, ch. 901, §1(122), 45 Stat. 995, provided for the discontinuance of reports on waste paper, etc., as follows: "122. Reports by the Clerk and Doorkeeper of the House and the Secretary and Sergeant at Arms of the Senate of the sales of waste paper and useless documents and condemned furniture, and so forth."
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: captsue@mosquitonet.com -liiMuNTOF 

Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 10:05 PM AS'J0Ri7\Tlpr;i 

To: Faulk, Scott (OST) • i: i UrbRAIiOKS 

Subject: Essential Air Service Comments 

'^^il m 21 A %U5 

The Essential Air Service program is very important to me and my family. My elderly parents live in Chisana and rely on 

40 Mile Air service for everything in their life, from food, supplies, mail, medical, etc. There is no road to their village at 

all. With them being off the road system it would leave them stranded in the wilderness with out the Essential Air 

Service program. Please keep the program. Thank you. Sue Mease, 1055 Chena Pump Rd. Fairbanks, AK 99709. 

(907)378-0582
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00121-CR

TIMOTHY DEAN MCALISTER,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Criminal 

Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1488130)

January 10, 2019

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

 Justice Wade Birdwell
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-87 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, June 9, 1998)

NRC STAFF ISSUES CONFIRMATORY ORDER TO SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT

REQUIRING IMPROVEMENTS TO EMPLOYEE CONCERNS PROGRAM

The staff of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory

Order to the STP Nuclear Operating Company confirming its agreement to improve the

handling of safety concerns brought to management by workers. The South Texas

Project nuclear generating station is located near Bay City, Texas.

The order, signed by Ashok A. Thadani, NRC’s Deputy Executive Director for

Regulatory Effectiveness, confirms the licensee’s agreement to:

1) Use an independent contractor to periodically survey its employees, supervisors,

management and contractors about their concerns regarding a safety-conscious work

environment through 2002 and report the results of each survey to the NRC.

2) Conduct annual ratings of supervisors and managers by employees.

3) Establish a mandatory training program for all supervisors and managers designed

to reinforce the importance of maintaining a safety-conscious work environment and of

assisting managers and supervisors in dealing with conflicts in the work place regarding

these issues.

4) Notify all of its employees and project contractors in writing of the details of the NRC

confirmatory order and inform them of their rights to raise safety concerns to the NRC

and their management without fear of retaliation.

The order was issued following findings by the NRC Office of Investigations that

the company had violated federal law by subjecting four employees to a hostile work

environment created by a former manager after the employees raised safety concerns.

The manager involved left the company in mid-1996.

Enforcement action by the NRC is being waived because the licensee settled

the employees’ complaint prior to an evidentiary hearing before, and prior to a finding

by the U.S. Department of Labor that the four employees had suffered discrimination.
NRC also waived enforcement action because STP Nuclear Operating Company took

what NRC regarded as particularly good corrective actions and designed a

comprehensive program for promoting a safety-conscious work environment. NRC also

believes the licensee’s overall sustained performance in the area of employee

protection has been good.

##