alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the period ended June 30, 2006 of MPW
Industrial Services Group, Inc. (the Issuer) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date hereof. I, Robert Valentine, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: October 13, 2006



/s/ Robert ValentineRobert ValentineVice President, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
```

[106th Congress Public Law 320]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ320.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 1286]]

Public Law 106-320
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
424 South Michigan Street in South Bend, Indiana, as the ``John Brademas 
         Post Office''. <<NOTE: Oct. 19, 2000 -  [H.R. 2938]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 424 
South Michigan Street in South Bend, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``John Brademas Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John Brademas Post Office''.

    Approved October 19, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2938 (S. 2804):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            June 20, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-30535

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Courvisier U. Glover, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:22-CR-291-2

______________________________

Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Courvisier U. Glover appeals his sentence of 32 months of 

imprisonment for possession of a firearm by a felon. He argues that his 

sentence was unreasonable in light of a subsequently adopted amendment to 

the Sentencing Guidelines and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 22, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-30535 Document: 58-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/22/2024
Glover preserved his general substantive reasonableness challenge, 

which we review for abuse of discretion. See Holguin-Hernandez v. United 

States, 140 S. Ct. 762, 766-67 (2020). We presume that a within-guidelines 

sentence, such as this one, is reasonable. See United States v. Hernandez, 876 

F.3d 161, 166 (5th Cir. 2017). A defendant may rebut this reasonableness 

presumption by showing that the sentence does not account for a factor that 

should receive significant weight, gives significant weight to an irrelevant or 

improper factor, or represents a clear error of judgment in balancing the

sentencing factors. Id.

To the extent that Glover contends that the district court should have 

applied the then-forthcoming amendment to the Guidelines, we review for 

plain error, see United States v. Zarco-Beiza, 24 F.4th 477, 481-82 (5th Cir. 

2022), and he has not demonstrated error, plain or otherwise, in the 

application of the Sentencing Guidelines that were in effect at the time of the 

offense and sentencing, see United States v. Rodarte-Vasquez, 488 F.3d 316, 

322 (5th Cir. 2007). Nor has he shown that Amendment 821 to the 

Sentencing Guidelines was merely clarifying and should therefore be 

considered on direct appeal. See United States v. Huff, 370 F.3d 454, 465-66

(5th Cir. 2004). Several § 3553(a) factors supported the sentence. Glover’s

arguments—including his contention that his criminal history category overrepresented the significance of his prior convictions—fail to rebut the 

presumption of reasonableness attached to his within-guidelines sentence. 

See Hernandez, 876 F.3d at 166.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 23-30535 Document: 58-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/22/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GATEWAY 2000,
INC.'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000895812
<NAME> GATEWAY 2000, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         871,351
<SECURITIES>                                   132,156
<RECEIVABLES>                                  576,394
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,856
<INVENTORY>                                    198,016
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,944,877
<PP&E>                                         667,701
<DEPRECIATION>                                 213,953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,511,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,213,006
<BONDS>                                          2,481
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,560
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,194,729
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,511,801
<SALES>                                      5,162,352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,162,352
<CGS>                                        4,114,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,114,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,278
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 696
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                339,462
<INCOME-TAX>                                   122,206
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            217,256
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   217,256
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.37
        

</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 11007 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ABEL RIOS, also known as Abel Garza, also known as DDD

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:13

- CR

- 384

- 4

Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Abel Rios has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Rios has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and
the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that thi s opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 18 , 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-11007 Document: 00513158498 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2015No. 14

- 11007

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-11007 Document: 00513158498 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2015
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov 

No. III-03-009 March 12, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO HOLD A PUBLIC MEETING IN ROSEMONT TO SEEK PUBLIC COMMENT 

 ON SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL TRANSPORTATION TEST PROPOSALS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will conduct a public meeting in Rosemont, Illinois, on

March 19, to obtain comments on a proposal to test casks for transporting radioactive spent fuel by rail

and by truck. 

 The proposal is part of the Package Performance Study (PPS) that focuses research on the

possibilities and consequences of extreme impact and fire transportation accidents. The proposals are

described in a test protocols report that outlines full-scale, high speed spent fuel cask impact and fire

testing experiments that NRC is considering sponsoring over the next few years. 

The meeting will be held from 8:00 a.m. until 5:30 p.m., at the Embassy Suites Hotel O’Hare,

5500 N. River Road, Rosemont, Illinois. 

It will be conducted in a roundtable format with a limited number of invited participants. A

facilitator will ensure participation by a broad spectrum of stakeholders, including citizen and

environmental groups, nuclear and transportation industries, academia, and governmental

representatives at the Federal, State and local level. Others are welcome to attend and will have

opportunities to comment on agenda items to be discussed by roundtable participants. 

 The test protocols report (NUREG-1768) is available for comment at the NRC’s website at:

 http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1768/.

 Additionally, copies of the report and other PPS-related documents can be found at

http://ttd.sandia.gov/nrc/modal.htm or obtained by contacting Ms. Amy Snyder by e-mail at

ams3@nrc.gov or by telephone at 301-415-8580. Written comments on the report will be accepted

until May 30, and can be submitted by e-mail or addressed to Ms. Snyder at the Spent Fuel Project

Office, Mail Stop O13-D13, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-001. 

###
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-05T08:46:55-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
### §46a–3. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–607, ch. V, §506(k)(4), formerly §506(h)(4), Oct. 31, 1972, 86 Stat. 1508, renumbered §506(i)(4), Pub. L. 95–391, title I, §108(a), Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 773, renumbered §506(j)(4), Pub. L. 96–304, title I, §101, July 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 889, renumbered §506(k)(4), Pub. L. 97–276, §101(e), Oct. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 1189

Section, Pub. L. 90–417, §106, July 23, 1968, 82 Stat. 413, placed limits on the availability of the stationery allowance for Senators. See section 6314 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 92–607, ch. V, §506(k), formerly §506(h), Oct. 31, 1972, 86 Stat. 1507, as amended by Pub. L. 93–145, §101, Nov. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 532, and renumbered §506(i) by Pub. L. 95–391, title I, §108(a), Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 773, renumbered §506(j) by Pub. L. 96–304, title I, §101, July 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 889, and renumbered §506(k) by Pub. L. 97–276, §101(e), Oct. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 1189, provided that, insofar as this section has application to Senators, the repeal is effective Jan. 1, 1973.
#### § 201.205 Salary adjustments.

Any negative adjustment to pay arising out of an employee's election of coverage, or a change in coverage, under a Federal benefits program requiring periodic deductions from pay shall not be considered collection of a “debt” for the purposes of this section if the amount to be recovered was accumulated over four pay periods or less. In such cases, the Commission need not comply with § 201.204, but it will provide a clear and concise statement in the employee's earnings statement advising the employee of the previous overpayment at the time the adjustment is made.
Case 0:20-cv-61382-RAR   Document 4   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2020   Page 1 of 2

Case 0:20-cv-61382-RAR   Document 4   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2020   Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Space Shuttle Challengerexplosion [electronic resource]**
 
Parts: 1a1b1c
 
SuDoc Number:J 1.14/2:SP 1
Item Number:0721 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000619504
 
August 28, 2019
### §258. Reliance on past administrative rulings, etc.

In any action or proceeding commenced prior to or on or after May 14, 1947 based on any act or omission prior to May 14, 1947, no employer shall be subject to any liability or punishment for or on account of the failure of the employer to pay minimum wages or overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended [29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], the Walsh-Healey Act, or the Bacon-Davis Act,1 if he pleads and proves that the act or omission complained of was in good faith in conformity with and in reliance on any administrative regulation, order, ruling, approval, or interpretation, of any agency of the United States, or any administrative practice or enforcement policy of any such agency with respect to the class of employers to which he belonged. Such a defense, if established, shall be a bar to the action or proceeding, notwithstanding that after such act or omission, such administrative regulation, order, ruling, approval, interpretation, practice, or enforcement policy is modified or rescinded or is determined by judicial authority to be invalid or of no legal effect.

(May 14, 1947, ch. 52, §9, 61 Stat. 88.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, referred to in text, is act June 25, 1938, ch. 676, 52 Stat. 1060, which is classified generally to chapter 8 (§201 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 201 of this title and Tables.

The Walsh-Healey and Bacon-Davis Acts, referred to in text, are defined for purposes of this chapter in section 262 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §638. House committee action on all appropriation bills to be completed by June 10

On or before June 10 of each year, the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives shall report annual appropriation bills providing new budget authority under the jurisdiction of all of its subcommittees for the fiscal year which begins on October 1 of that year.

(Pub. L. 93–344, title III, §307, July 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 313; Pub. L. 99–177, title II, §201(b), Dec. 12, 1985, 99 Stat. 1051.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1328 of Title 31 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 31, Money and Finance, by Pub. L. 97–258, §1, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 877.

#### Amendments

1985—Pub. L. 99–177 substituted "by June 10" for "before first appropriation bill is reported" in section catchline, and amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "Prior to reporting the first regular appropriation bill for each fiscal year, the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives shall, to the extent practicable, complete subcommittee markup and full committee action on all regular appropriation bills for that year and submit to the House a summary report comparing the committee's recommendations with the appropriate levels of budget outlays and new budget authority as set forth in the most recently agreed to concurrent resolution on the budget for that year."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1985 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–177 effective Dec. 12, 1985, and applicable with respect to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 1985, see section 275(a)(1) of Pub. L. 99–177, formerly set out as an Effective and Termination Dates note under section 900 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 112–25, title I, §104(a), Aug. 2, 2011, 125 Stat. 246.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-03-044 December 15, 2003

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC PROHIBITS FORMER SENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR 

 FROM SOME NRC-LICENSED ACTIVITIES FOR 3 YEARS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued an order prohibiting a former senior

reactor operator at the Waterford 3 nuclear power plant near Killona, Louisiana, from applying

for or holding an NRC reactor operator’s license for three years.

NRC took the action after Scott P. Wolfe twice tested positive for an illegal substance

during random fitness-for-duty tests administered by his former employer, Entergy Operations,

Inc. 

In issuing the order, effective immediately, Samuel J. Collins, the NRC’s Deputy

Executive Director for Reactor Programs, said Mr. Wolfe had tested positive for an illegal

substance in 1990 and signed a “re-entry agreement” in which he agreed to abstain from use of

illegal drugs. On July17, Mr. Wolfe again tested positive for an illegal substance. His

employment with Entergy was terminated on July 25, and the NRC terminated Mr. Wolfe’s

senior operator’s license on August 26 .

“The NRC holds licensed reactor operators to high performance standards and entrusts

them with assuring the public health and safety in the operation of nuclear power plants,” Mr.

Collins said in the Order. “Licensed reactor operators are expected to comply with all NRC

requirements, including the fitness-for-duty requirements of the NRC (10CFR Part 26) and the

facility at which they are employed. Mr. Wolfe’s actions have violated the NRC’s and the

public’s trust and demonstrated that he can not be relied upon to comply with fitness-for-duty

requirements.”

Mr. Wolfe has 20 days from the date of the Order to respond or request a hearing.

A copy of the Order and the letter notifying Mr. Wolfe of the enforcement action will be

posted to the NRC web site at: www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/enforcement/actions/.

###
Exhibit 

2

Case 9:20-cv-81307-RKA Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 1 of 10


Case 9:20-cv-81307-RKA Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 4 of 10
Case 9:20-cv-81307-RKA Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 5 of 10

Case 9:20-cv-81307-RKA Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 7 of 10
Case 9:20-cv-81307-RKA Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 8 of 10
Case 9:20-cv-81307-RKA Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 9 of 10
Case 9:20-cv-81307-RKA Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2020 Page 10 of 10
---

> Legal Proceedings
> 
> 
> General
> 
> 
> We are involved in routine litigation.  Governmental authorities and other parties frequently threaten us with legal proceedings.  However, we do not consider that there are any current proceedings which could materiallyadversely affect our overall business or financial position.
> 
> 
> Legal proceedings settled
> 
> 
> In July 2001, the ACCC commenced court action against Telstra in the Federal Court, alleging we made misleading statements to former One.Tel next generation mobile customers concerning the liability of those customers to pay termination or disconnection fees to One.Tel if they moved to a service provider other than Telstra.  The proceedings were settled between the parties in December 2001, without any material adverse effect upon Telstra's business or its financial position.
> 
> 
> In 1998 and 1999 AAPT and Primus notified a dispute to the ACCC in relation to the amount payable by them to Telstra for PSTN Originating and Terminating Access.  Telstra filed an appeal from the subsequent ACCC decisions to the Australian Competition Tribunal, claiming that AAPT and Primus should pay an increased amount for the relevant services.  The proceedings were settled in April 2002 and did not have a material adverse effect on our financial results or position.

---

| |  | 
| |  |
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 09671

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

09671\09671_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 09671\09671_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09671\09671_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09671\09671_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09671\09671_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09671\09671_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

09671\Certification Statement Plant ID 09671.pdf Plant certification statement

x 09671\Supplemental Documents\09671_Diagram D-1,POND-1 Ash Site Sedimentation Pond AES Cayuga LL.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09671\Supplemental Documents\09671_Diagram D-2,WWT-1 Process Water Reclamation Facility AES Cay.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09671\Supplemental Documents\09671_Diagram D-3,WWT-2 FGD Treatment System AES Cayuga LLC 09671.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09671\Supplemental Documents\09671_MAP-1 Aerial Map AES Cayuga LLC 09671.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09671\Supplemental Documents\Emails\Steam electric questionnaire questions.rtf Follow-up correspondence regarding survey contents.

x 09671\09671_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09671\09671_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

09671\09671_Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.