alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-99-52

October 27, 1999

NRC STAFF SCHEDULES ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE

IN PONCE, PUERTO RICO ON NOVEMBER 9

TO DISCUSS SECURITY CONCERNS WITH MAYAGUEZ COMPANY

Meeting Is Open To Observation By The Public

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a predecisional enforcement

conference with Western Soil, Incorporated, of Mayaguez, Puerto Rico, at 8:00 a.m. on

November 9 at the Holiday Inn in Ponce to discuss regulatory concerns related to a June 4

theft of a device containing radioactive material from a construction site in Aguada.

The device, a gauge containing radioactive material which is used to measure soil moisture

and density, was found by local police on June 7 and returned to the company. It did not

appear to have been tampered with.

NRC officials say three apparent violations associated with the event have been identified.

The first involved a failure by the company to secure the device from unauthorized removal

and failure to maintain constant surveillance of licensed radioactive material stored in the bed

of a pickup truck at the site. The second involves failure to notify the NRC Operations Center

in Washington, D.C., immediately after discovery that the gauge was stolen. The third

involved failure to transport the gauge with a feature, such as a seal not readily breakable, to

provide evidence that the package was not opened while in transport.

The decision to hold a predecisonal enforcement conference does not mean that a

determination has been made that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be

taken. The purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance, to

provide the licensee with an opportunity to point out errors that may have been made in NRC

inspection reports and to enable the company to outline its proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action, such as a

civil penalty, will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at

a later time.

#
### §661b. OMB and CBO analysis, coordination, and review

#### (a) In general

For the executive branch, the Director shall be responsible for coordinating the estimates required by this subchapter. The Director shall consult with the agencies that administer direct loan or loan guarantee programs.

#### (b) Delegation

The Director may delegate to agencies authority to make estimates of costs. The delegation of authority shall be based upon written guidelines, regulations, or criteria consistent with the definitions in this subchapter.

#### (c) Coordination with Congressional Budget Office

In developing estimation guidelines, regulations, or criteria to be used by Federal agencies, the Director shall consult with the Director of the Congressional Budget Office.

#### (d) Improving cost estimates

The Director and the Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall coordinate the development of more accurate data on historical performance of direct loan and loan guarantee programs. They shall annually review the performance of outstanding direct loans and loan guarantees to improve estimates of costs. The Office of Management and Budget and the Congressional Budget Office shall have access to all agency data that may facilitate the development and improvement of estimates of costs.

#### (e) Historical credit program costs

The Director shall review, to the extent possible, historical data and develop the best possible estimates of adjustments that would convert aggregate historical budget data to credit reform accounting.

#### (f) Administrative costs

The Director and the Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall each analyze and report to Congress on differences in long-term administrative costs for credit programs versus grant programs by January 31, 1992. Their reports shall recommend to Congress any changes, if necessary, in the treatment of administrative costs under credit reform accounting.

(Pub. L. 93–344, title V, §503, as added Pub. L. 101–508, title XIII, §13201(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–611.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 503 of Pub. L. 93–344, title V, July 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 321, was classified to section 701 of former Title 31, prior to repeal and reenactment in section 1552(a) of Title 31, Money and Finance, by Pub. L. 97–258, §5(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1068, the first section of which enacted Title 31.
### §2212. Appointment and supervision of Chief Executive Officer for Visitor Services

#### (a) Appointment

The Chief Executive Officer shall be appointed by the Architect of the Capitol.

#### (b) Supervision and oversight

The Chief Executive Officer shall report directly to the Architect of the Capitol and shall be subject to oversight by the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate and the Committee on House Administration of the House of Representatives.

#### (c) Removal

Upon removal of the Chief Executive Officer, the Architect of the Capitol shall immediately provide notice of the removal to the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate, the Committee on House Administration of the House of Representatives, and the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and Senate. The notice shall include the reasons for the removal.

#### (d) Compensation

The Chief Executive Officer shall be paid at an annual rate of pay equal to the annual rate of pay of the Deputy Architect of the Capitol.

#### (e) Transition for current Chief Executive Officer for Visitor Services

#### (1) Appointment

The individual who serves as the Chief Executive Officer for Visitor Services under section 1806 of this title as of October 20, 2008, shall be the first Chief Executive Officer for Visitor Services appointed by the Architect under this section.

#### (2) Omitted

(Pub. L. 110–437, title II, §202, Oct. 20, 2008, 122 Stat. 4986.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1806 of this title, referred to in subsec. (e)(1), was repealed by Pub. L. 110–437, title II, §202(e)(2), Oct. 20, 2008, 122 Stat. 4987.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 202 of Pub. L. 110–437. Subsec. (e)(2) of section 202 of Pub. L. 110–437 repealed section 1806 of this title.
|  |
|--|

|  |  |
|--|--|

| ** ** |
|------------|

|   | ****Vincent W. Forster, Jr./Missing Gun File**** 
The Vincent W. Foster, Jr./Missing Gun File dated July 20, 1993, consists of four computer printouts. 

Part 1

Introduction
Reading Room Index - A   B   C   D   E    F   G- H   I    J    K   L   M   N   -O   P   Q   R   S   T   U-V   W   X   Y   Z   
Electronic Reading Room
- Alphabetical Listing- Espionage-Famous Persons-Gangster Era- Historical Interest- Unusual Phenomena-Violent CrimeFBI              File Fact Sheet FOIA Request Instructions- FOIA Request Form - Privacy Waiver and Certificate of Identity Form Privacy Act Instructions- Privacy Act Request FormDOJ              Reference GuideU.S.              DOJ FOIASearch
All of these publications are in PDF (Portable Document Format). To view them you will need to have the Adobe Acrobat Reader plug-in installed on your computer. The Reader can be downloaded at no cost from Adobe's site on the World Wide Web.   If you have difficulty accessing any material on this site because of a disability, please contact us in writing or via telephone and we will work with you to make the information available.

Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Section    202-324-5520 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-058 May 10, 2002

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETINGS MAY 21 - 23 IN NEVADA

ON DRAFT YUCCA MOUNTAIN REVIEW PLAN 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold three public meetings in Nevada in late May to

discuss the draft version of a plan it would use to review an application to build a potential high-level

nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, if Congress approves the President’s Site

Recommendation and if the Department of Energy (DOE) submits such an application.

The meetings will be:

-- Tuesday, May 21, from 6:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. at the Mountain View Casino and Bowl, 1750

South Pahrump Valley Boulevard, Pahrump.

-- Wednesday, May 22, from 2:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the Clark County Building Department,

4701 W. Russell Road, Las Vegas. The cross street is Decatur.

-- Thursday, May 23, from 6:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. at the Clark County Building Department. 

(See above address.)

The meetings will include several brief presentations on the purpose, scope, structure and

content of the “Yucca Mountain Review Plan, Draft Revision 2." The principal purpose of the plan is

to ensure the quality and uniformity of the NRC staff’s licensing reviews of the potential application by

DOE. The NRC is seeking public input on whether the draft plan, which was issued in March, would

effectively assess the safety of a potential geologic repository for high-level nuclear waste.

Copies of the “Yucca Mountain Review Plan, Draft Revision 2" will be available at the public

meetings. The draft plan is also available at the NRC’s web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/nuregs/staff/sr1804 . A hard copy is available from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Attention: Reproduction and Distribution Services Branch, Washington, D.C. 20555-

0001, or by sending an e-mail request to distribution@nrc.gov .

NRC will keep a transcript of each meeting to ensure full consideration of all comments and

questions. In addition, interested individuals may submit comments electronically by clicking on the

“comment form” at the above web site address. Comments may also be submitted by regular mail via a

letter to the Rules and Directives Branch, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Mail Stop T-6D59, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001. The comments should be submitted

by June 27.
###
Exhibit 99.1

                                Certification of
                             Chief Executive Officer
                         of Prime Medical Services, Inc.


This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for
the quarter ended June 30, 2002 of Prime Medical Services, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Issuer").

I, Brad A. Hummel, the Chief Executive Officer, of Issuer certify that to the
best of my knowledge:

     (i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
          (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

Dated:  August 7, 2002.




                                        By:/s/ Brad A. Hummel
                                           Brad A. Hummel
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           Prime Medical Services, Inc.
#### § 191.83 Person entitled to receive payment.

Drawback is paid to the claimant (see § 191.82).
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-054 May 1, 2002

NRC APPROVES POWER UPRATE FOR SEQUOYAH UNITS 1 AND 2

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a request by the Tennessee Valley Authority

(TVA) to increase the generating capacity of the Sequoyah Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, by 1.3

percent, or 15 megawatts. 

The power uprate at the plant, near Soddy-Daisy, Tennessee, will increase the generating

capacity of each reactor to 1137 megawatts of electricity. TVA intends to implement the power uprates

at both units next month. The application for the power increase was submitted to the NRC on

November 15, 2001.

The NRC’s evaluation of the requested power uprate for the plant focused on several areas,

including nuclear steam supply systems, instrumentation and control systems, electrical systems,

accident calculations, radiological consequences, operations and technical specification changes. The

NRC staff determined that the licensee could safely increase the power output of the reactor by making

certain plant instrumentation modifications.

###
#### Daniel A. McKeever, Respondent, v. William F. Schwerin et al., Defendants, and Carl J. Hynes, Appellant. Daniel A. McKeever, Appellant, v. James C. McKeever, Respondent, et al., Defendants. Daniel A. McKeever, Appellant, v. William F. Schwerin et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Judgments and orders affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor, P. J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for granting a new trial as to defendant Hynes on the ground that the finding of negligence in respect to said defendant is against the weight of evidence. (One judgment is in favor of plaintiff against defendant Hynes in an automobile negligence action; one judgment is in favor of defendant McKeever and one judgment is in favor of defendants Schwerin for no cause of action. The orders deny defendant Hynes’ motions for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Harris, MeCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ. [See *post,*p. 941.]
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Naamit Salomon, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(i)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: June 29, 2007 |  | /s/ Naamit Salomon 
Naamit Salomon Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-06 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, January 12, 1998)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a

meeting on February 4 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will

begin at 10 a.m. in Room T-2B1, of the NRC's Two White Flint

North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike. The Subcommittee on

Planning and Procedures will discuss proposed ACRS activities and

the qualifications of candidates for appointment to ACRS. Some

portions of the meeting dealing with internal personnel rules and

practices of ACRS, may be closed.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for

public comment, will be described in a Notice of Meeting

published in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

#
§ 145.72 Delivery to Customs custody for exportation. In certain cases where merchandise has not been in continuous Government custody, delivery to Customs custody is appropriate before exportation by mail, as set forth in the following sections of this chapter: ( a ) Section 10.8 (articles exported for repairs or alterations).
( b ) Section 10.9 (articles exported for processing).
( c ) Section 148.33 (merchandise which was imported free of duty under a personal exemption, found to be unsatisfactory, and is being exported for replacement).
( d ) Section 10.38 (exportation of imported merchandise which was entered temporarily under bond).
( e ) Section 191.42 (exportation of rejected imported merchandise, with drawback of duties).
[T.D. 73-135, 38 FR 13369, May 21, 1973, as amended by T.D. 98-16, 63 FR 11005, Mar. 5, 1998]
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-02-020 April 1, 2002

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404) 562-4416 E-mail: opa2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417

 

NRC TO MEET WITH CP&L OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS SAFETY 

PERFORMANCE AT HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Carolina Power & Light

Company officials on Thursday, April 11, to discuss the results of NRC’s annual assessment of safety

performance at the Harris nuclear power plant, located near New Hill, North Carolina.

The meeting will be held at 1:00 p.m. in the Harris Visitor Center Board Room. The public is

invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be available before the meeting is adjourned to

answer any questions.

A letter sent from the NRC’s Regional Administrator to CP&L, which addresses plant safety

performance during the previous year and forms the basis of the meeting discussion, is available from

Region II Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/har_2001q4.pdf

Current information for the Harris plant is available at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/HAR1/har1_chart.html . 

###
§ 122.143 Flights from the U.S. to the U.S. Virgin Islands. ( a ) *In general.* Aircraft on flights from the U.S. to the U.S. Virgin Islands are governed by the provisions of this part that apply to aircraft on a flight within the U.S.
( b ) *Census Bureau.* When Census Bureau's Foreign Trade Regulations (15 CFR part 30) apply to aircraft carrying merchandise to the U.S. Virgin Islands from the U.S., permission to depart must be obtained from the port director. Permission to depart will not be given unless: ( 1 ) A complete manifest and Electronic Export Information (EEI) as required by 15 CFR part 30 are filed; or
( 2 ) An incomplete manifest under 15 CFR 30.47 is filed and the complete manifest and EEI is filed within 7 business days after departure.
[T.D. 88-12, 53 FR 9292, Mar. 22, 1988, as amended by CBP Dec. 17-06, 82 FR 32239, July 13, 2017]
#### § 143.15 Deposit of estimated duties and taxes.

Estimated duties shall be deposited in accordance with subpart G of part 141 of this chapter before the merchandise is released from Customs custody.
schn-ex101_8.htm



Exhibit 10.1

 

SUMMARY SHEET FOR 2021 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. 

 

The following table sets forth the compensation for the Company’s non-employee Directors for the Board term commencing at the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders:

 


		
	
Annual Cash Retainer
	
Annual cash retainer for non-employee Directors of $90,000 ($105,000 for the Lead Director) paid in arrears in four equal installments on or about March 31, 2021, June 30, 2021, September 30, 2021, and December 30, 2021 (the “Installment Dates”) for the Company’s most-recently ended fiscal quarter.  

	
Annual Deferred Stock Unit Grant
	
Annual grant of Deferred Stock Units to non-employee Directors for the right to receive shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock equal to the number of shares determined by dividing $120,000 by the closing market price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock on the grant date. 

	
Chairman Fees
	
$25,000 annual fee for Audit Committee Chair.  $18,000 annual fee for Compensation Committee Chair.  $10,000 annual fee for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Chair.  Chairman fees are paid in arrears in four equal installments on the Installment Dates.




 

All Deferred Stock Units are granted under the Company’s 1993 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of November 2013, and are subject to the terms of such plan and the applicable Deferred Stock Units award agreements approved for issuance of Deferred Stock Units to non-employee Directors under the plan.

 

Non-employee Directors may elect to defer all or part of their compensation under the Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, which was adopted by the Board in 2006.