alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Jarden Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin E. Franklin, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Martin E. Franklin              
|Martin E. Franklin                  
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|October 30, 2009                    

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ian G.H. Ashken, Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/ Ian G.H. Ashken                      
|Ian G.H. Ashken                          
|Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
|October 30, 2009
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-069 June 3, 2002

NRC REVISES PUBLIC MEETING POLICY 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has revised its public meeting policy to enhance and

clarify the opportunity for public participation. The policy changes, which were announced in broad

form in January, are in response to suggestions made at an April 2001 public meeting.

The revised policy continues NRC’s longstanding practice of providing the public with

substantial information on its activities and of conducting business in an open manner, while balancing

the need for the NRC staff to exercise its regulatory and safety responsibilities without undue

administrative burden.

It sets out three categories of public meetings and describes for each the type of information that

will be available, the ways the public is invited to participate and staff follow-up actions. 

Category 1 meetings are typically held with one licensee to discuss specific regulatory issues. 

The public is invited to observe the business portion of the meeting and is provided an opportunity to

ask questions of the NRC staff before the meeting is adjourned. Category 2 meetings are typically held

with a group of industry representatives, licensees, vendors or non-governmental organizations to

discuss issues which could apply to several facilities. These meetings provide an opportunity for the

public to not only observe and gain information, but also to participate by providing the NRC with

feedback on the analysis of the issues, alternatives and/or decisions. Category 3 meetings are typically

held with representatives of non-governmental organizations, private citizens, interested parties or

various businesses or industries. The objective of these meetings is to provide the public an opportunity

to work directly with the NRC to provide a range of views, information, concerns and suggestions

regarding regulatory issues. 

Meeting agendas, background documents and meeting summaries will be available in NRC’s

Agency-wide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS) and at NRC’s web site for certain

categories of meetings. The policy also provides guidance on teleconferencing, visitor security and

other administrative issues.

The policy applies to NRC staff-sponsored and conducted meetings. It does not apply to

Commission meetings or meetings sponsored by NRC offices that report directly to the Commission, to
meetings between NRC staff and representatives of State governments, or to meetings conducted by

outside groups that NRC staff members attend. 

NRC’s web page at http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/public-meetings/meeting-faq.html

contains links to the revised policy and frequently asked questions about public meetings. For further

information on NRC’s public meeting policy, contact Mindy Landau or Ramin Assa at 301-415-8703 or

301-415-8709, respectively. 

###
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-99-31 May 24, 1999

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $110,000 FINE AGAINST FIRSTENERGY

FOR DISCRIMINATION AGAINST PERRY EMPLOYEE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $110,000 fine against

FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company for discriminating against an employee at the Perry

Nuclear Power Station who testified in a Department of Labor hearing involving another

employee.

The NRC prohibits utilities from discriminating against employees for raising safety

issues or other "protected" activities like providing testimony to the Department of Labor.

An NRC investigation found that the Radiation Protection Manager at the Perry plant

had discriminated against a supervisor in 1997 for testifying in a Department of Labor hearing

involving possible discrimination against another employee.

The supervisor had told utility officials that his testimony would not be favorable to the

utility. The investigation determined that the discrimination against the supervisor consisted of

"verbal counseling" by the manager and placement of a memorandum in the supervisor's

personnel file documenting that counseling.

In notifying the utility of the proposed fine, James E. Dyer, NRC Regional Administrator,

said: "This violation is a very significant regulatory concern because it involved employee

discrimination by the Radiation Protection Manager, a mid-level facility manager, against an

employee for testifying in a Department of Labor proceeding."

He continued, "Discrimination committed at this level has the potential to create a

chilling effect throughout the Radiation Protection Department and could influence individuals in

other plant departments."

In responding earlier to the potential violation, the utility said that the manager was

unfamiliar with the NRC's employee protection regulations and did not understand what

activities were protected.

"It is disturbing to the NRC that a mid-level manager would not be familiar with the

Commission's employee protection regulations," Mr. Dyer said.

The proposed fine could have been $176,000, based on its severity and the lack of

corrective action by the utility. The NRC enforcement policy, however, limits a fine to $110,000

per day for any one violation.

FirstEnergy has until June 21 to pay the fine or to protest it. If the fine is protested and
subsequently imposed by the NRC staff, the utility may request a hearing.

#####
#### § 190.24 Transfer of merchandise.

Evidence of any transfers of merchandise (*see* § 190.10) must be evidenced by records, as defined in § 190.2.
§ 12.104j Emergency protection for Iraqi cultural antiquities. ( a ) *Restriction.* Importation of archaeological or ethnological material of Iraq is restricted pursuant to the Emergency Protection for Iraqi Cultural Antiquities Act of 2004 (title III of Pub. L. 108-429) and section 304 of the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 2603).
( b ) *Description of restricted material.* The term “archaeological or ethnological material of Iraq” means cultural property of Iraq and other items of archaeological, historical, cultural, rare scientific, or religious importance illegally removed from the Iraq National Museum, the National Library of Iraq, and other locations in Iraq, since the adoption of United Nations Security Council Resolution 661 of 1990. CBP Decision 08-17 sets forth the Designated List of Archaeological and Ethnological Material of Iraq that describes the types of specific items or categories of archaeological or ethnological material that are subject to import restrictions.
[73 FR 23342, Apr. 30, 2008]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-05 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, January 12, 1998)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a

meeting on February 3 in Rockville, Maryland, to continue its

review of proposed improvements to the senior management meeting

process.

The meeting of the Subcommittee on Plant Operations, which

will be open to public observation, will begin at 8:30 a.m. in

Room T-2B3, of the NRC's Two White Flint North Building at 11545

Rockville Pike.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for

public comment, will be described in a Notice of Meeting

published in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

#
### §124. Agricultural entry or purchase of lands withdrawn or classified as containing sodium or sulphur

Lands withdrawn, classified, or reported as valuable for sodium and/or sulphur and subject to prospecting, leasing, or development under the General Leasing Act of February 25, 1920, or Acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto [30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.], shall be subject to appropriation, location, selection, entry, or purchase if otherwise available in the form and manner and subject to the reservations, provisions, limitations, and conditions of the Act of Congress approved July 17, 1914 (38 Stat. L. 509; U.S.C., title 30, sec. 123); Provided, however, That lands lying within the geologic structure of a field, or withdrawn, classified, or reported as valuable for any of the minerals named herein and/or in any of said sections, or upon which leases or prospecting permits have been applied for or granted, for the production of any of such minerals, shall not be subject to such appropriation, location, selection, entry, or purchase unless it shall be determined by the Secretary of the Interior that such disposal will not unreasonably interfere with operations under said sections.

(Mar. 4, 1933, ch. 278, 47 Stat. 1570.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The General Leasing Act of February 25, 1920, referred to in text, probably means the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, which is classified generally to chapter 3A (§181 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 181 of this title and Tables.

The Act of Congress approved July 17, 1914, referred to in text, is act July 17, 1914, ch. 142, 38 Stat. 509, which is classified to sections 121 to 123 of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning and Procedures will hold a meeting on November 3, 2004, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. 

The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the exception of a portion that may be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (2) and (6) to discuss organizational and personnel matters that relate solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of the ACRS, and information the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows: 

*Wednesday, November 3, 2004—11:45 a.m.—1 p.m.*

The Subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and related matters. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee. 

Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. Sam Duraiswamy (telephone: 301-415-7364) between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (ET) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are open to the public. 

Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Official between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes in the agenda. 

Dated: October 18, 2004. 

John H. Flack, 

Acting Branch Chief, ACRS/ACNW. 

[FR Doc. 04-23663 Filed 10-21-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-123 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, August 15, 1997)

NRC AUTHORIZES UTAH URANIUM MILL

TO RECEIVE AND PROCESS MATERIAL FROM PENNSYLVANIA

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has granted a request from International

Uranium Corporation to receive and process uranium-bearing material from the Cabot

Corporation's facility near Boyertown, Pennsylvania, at International Uranium's NRC-licensed

White Mesa uranium mill near Blanding, Utah.

The material, which contains uranium, tantalum and niobium, will be shipped by train

and exclusive-use trucks. It is a moist solid, with a weight of approximately 16,000 tons. Cabot

is authorized to possess this material under an NRC license. At the mill, the material will be

processed to separate the uranium from the tantalum and niobium. The material will be

processed primarily for the recovery of uranium.

The NRC has concluded that International Uranium’s receipt and processing of the

material will not result in any significant increase in the types or amounts of materials that may

be released off site, in the occupational radiation exposures, or in the potential for or

consequences from radiological accidents.

###
#### § 112.0 Scope.

This part sets forth regulations providing for the bonding of carriers which will receive merchandise for transportation in bond, the licensing of cartmen and lightermen, and the procedures for applying for such bonds and licenses. This part also sets forth the regulations concerning the obtaining of identification cards by cartmen and lightermen, and their employees and the procedures for revoking or suspending licenses and identification cards. Provisions setting forth the duties and responsibilities of cartmen and lightermen are set forth in part 125 of this chapter.

[T.D. 73-140, 38 FR 13551, May 23, 1973, as amended by T.D. 94-81, 59 FR 51494, Oct. 12, 1994]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00039

- CR

James FERNANDEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 83rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12716

- CR

Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial

court is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED December 31, 2014.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
### §6562. Transfers of funds by Secretary of Senate; approval of Committee on Appropriations

During any fiscal year (commencing with the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1982) the Secretary of the Senate is authorized to make such transfers between appropriations of funds available for disbursement by him during such year, subject to the approval of the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 97–276, §101(e), Oct. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 1189.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 64–2 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is based on section 104 of S. 2939, Ninety-seventh Congress, 2d Session, as reported Sept. 22, 1982, and incorporated by reference in section 101(e) of Pub. L. 97–276, to be effective as if enacted into law.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Funds by Secretary of Senate

Provisions authorizing Secretary of Senate, as Disbursing Officer of Senate, to make such transfers between appropriations of funds available for disbursement by him for specific fiscal years, as he deems appropriate, subject to customary reprograming procedures of Senate Committee on Appropriations were contained in the following appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 97–51, §113, Oct. 1, 1981, 95 Stat. 963.

Pub. L. 97–12, title I, §107, June 5, 1981, 95 Stat. 62.
### SUBCHAPTER VI—LOCATION OF PHOSPHATE ROCK LANDS UNDER PLACER-MINING LAWS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies
that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of BUCA, Inc.

Date: March 14, 2007



/s/ Wallace B. DoolinWallace B. DoolinChairman and Chief Executive Officer




/s/ Kaye R. OLearyKaye R. OLearyChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
### §142. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts June 29, 1922, ch. 251, §1, 42 Stat. 715; Nov. 5, 1990, Pub. L. 101–520, title III, §307, 104 Stat. 2277; Pub. L. 108–7, div. H, title I, §1208(a), Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 375, established office of administrative assistant and disbursing officer of Library of Congress which was abolished by section 142a of this title. As amended generally by Pub. L. 108–7, section no longer relates to office of administrative assistant and disbursing officer. See section 141 of this title.
#                     2004 Publications                  

Skip to Page Content

*January 9, 2004*

Improving Federal Disability Data

*April 15, 2004*

Disability Matters In Tribal Communities

*June 21, 2004*

Summary of the Native American Forum: Disability Matters in Tribal Communities

*July 8, 2004*

Position Paper on Amending the Air Carrier Access Act to Allow for Private Right of Action

*July 12, 2004*

Update on the UN Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities (July)

*July 26, 2004*

National Council on Disability: 20 Years of Independence (July 2004)

*October 1, 2004*

Design for Inclusion: Creating a New Marketplace - Industry White Paper

*October 26, 2004*

Consumer-Directed Health Care: How Well Does It Work?

*October 28, 2004*

Design for Inclusion: Creating a New Marketplace

*October 28, 2004*

Design for Inclusion: Creating a New Marketplace -- Online Version

*November 24, 2004*

Update on the UN Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities (November)

*December 1, 2004*

Righting the Americans with Disabilities Act

*December 24, 2004*

Livable Communities for Adults with Disabilities
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. OFAHEMOONI LATU, aka “Mary,” Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-10285.

D.C. No. CR-98-00078-ACK.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*640Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 24, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, RYMER and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ofahemooni Latu appeals the conviction and 168-month sentence imposed after a jury found her guilty of distributing cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Latu contends that the district court erred by applying a preponderance of the evidence standard, rather than a clear and convincing evidence standard, to enhance her sentence, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § lB1.3(a)(2), for distribution of an additional uncharged quantity of cocaine. Because Latu raises this issue for the first time on appeal, we review only for plain error. *See United States v. Jordan,*256 F.3d 922, 926 (9th Cir.2001).

Whether or not the district court should have applied a clear and convincing standard is immaterial in this case because of the court’s credibility determination and conservative estimate of drug quantity. *See id.*at 930 (requiring a showing of prejudice on plain error review).

Latu also challenges the constitutionality of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). This contention is foreclosed by our decision in *United States v. Buckland,*289 F.3d 558, 559 (9th Cir.2002) (en banc) (as amended) (upholding facial constitutionality of § 841).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.