alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001046356
<NAME> BUILDING MATERIALS HOLDING CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,736
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,882
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,188
<INVENTORY>                                     71,507
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               171,615
<PP&E>                                         140,542
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,449
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 309,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,500
<BONDS>                                         91,562
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                     156,204
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   309,640
<SALES>                                        539,335
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               539,335
<CGS>                                          415,121
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  520,583
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,695
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,435
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,307
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,128
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,128
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.67


</TABLE>
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-19 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, February 2, 1999)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received three reports from its Advisory

Committee on Nuclear Waste following the committee’s meetings December 15-17. The

reports, in the form of letters, provide comments on:

-- development of a standard review plan for decommissioning;

-- the regulatory uses of importance measures for waste management and possible application

to the proposed high-level radioactive waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada;

-- the Committee’s September 1998 visit to German waste isolation authorities and facilities.

Copies of the reports are available through the NRC’s Office of Public Affairs, the NRC’s

homepage (www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW) and the Public Document Room.

###
EXHIBIT 32

Securities
and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Eastern American Natural Gas Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a
separate disclosure document.

The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.,
Trustee, Trustee for Eastern American Natural Gas TrustBy:

/s/ MIKE ULRICH Vice PresidentThe Bank of New York Mellon Trust
Company, N.A.


Date:
November 9, 2012

---



QuickLinks
```

[106th Congress Public Law 315]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ315.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 1275]]

Public Law 106-315
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the building of the United States Postal Service located at 
307 Main Street in Johnson City, New York, as the ``James W. McCabe, Sr. 
     Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 19, 2000 -  [H.R. 2302]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The building of the United States Postal Service located at 307 Main 
Street in Johnson City, New York, shall be known and designated as the 
``James W. McCabe, Sr. Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James W. McCabe, Sr. Post 
Office Building''.

    Approved October 19, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2302:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Sept. 6, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2068

_____________________________

JULIAN D. DAILY, Former 

Husband,

Appellant,

v.

SHAUNDRA B. DAILY, Former 

Wife,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Victor L. Hulslander, Judge.

May 22, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, MAKAR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

William Falik of William Falik, P.A., Gainesville, for Appellant.

Kelly R. McNeal of McNeal Legal, LLC, Gainesville, and Caroline 

Picart, Brandon, for Appellee.
§ 148.64 Administrative exemption. ( a ) *Application of exemption.* The exemption from duty and internal revenue tax contemplated by section 321(a)(2)(B), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(B)), may be applied to articles for the personal and household use, including gifts, of a crewmember arriving in the United States who is not entitled to an exemption under subheading 9804.00.30, 9804.00.65, 9804.00.70, or 9804.00.72, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) (see §§ 148.66(c) and 148.65). The exemption may be applied when the crewmember is entitled to an exemption under subheading 9804.00.80, HTSUS (19 U.S.C. 1202), for articles for use while on temporary leave (§ 148.63).
( b ) *Limitations.* No article accompanying a crewmember arriving in the United States shall be exempted from duty or internal revenue tax under section 321(a)(2)(B), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, if any article accompanying such crewmember is subject to duty or internal revenue tax by reason of the following limitations. ( 1 ) *Value of articles.* The exemption shall be allowed only when the aggregate fair retail value of all articles not otherwise entitled to an exemption does not exceed $200.
( 2 ) *Articles subject to internal revenue tax.* The exemption shall not be applied to any article subject to internal revenue tax in addition to any articles allowed an exemption under subheading 9804.00.80, HTSUS (19 U.S.C. 1202), other than: ( i ) Cigarettes not in excess of 50;
( ii ) Cigars not in excess of 10;
( iii ) Alcoholic beverages not in excess of 150 milliliters; or
( iv ) Alcoholic perfumery not in excess of 150 milliliters (Subheading 9805.00.50, HTSUS (19 U.S.C. 1202, 1321)). [T.D. 80-179.].
[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. 80-179, 45 FR 45580, July 7, 1980; T.D. 84-149, 49 FR 28699, July 16, 1984; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51265, Dec. 21, 1988; T.D. 94-51, 59 FR 30296, June 13, 1994; T.D. 97-75, 62 FR 46442, Sept. 3, 1997]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          18,769
<SECURITIES>                                    13,653
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,002
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,235
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               121,213
<PP&E>                                          33,593
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 147,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,763
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           490
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   147,893
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,118
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (254)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  33
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,816
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,726
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,090
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,090
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle, IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. III-01-035 July 5, 2001

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH EXELON GENERATION CO. TO DISCUSS SAFETY

PERFORMANCE AT THE DRESDEN NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with Exelon Generation Company officials July

11 to discuss the NRCís annual assessment of safety performance at the Dresden Nuclear Station near

Morris, Illinois.

The meeting will begin at 1:30 p.m. CDT and will be held at the plantís Training Center in

rooms 101-103, 6500 N. Dresden Road near Morris. The public is invited to observe the session. 

NRC officials will be available afterwards to answer questions.

The annual assessment, referred to as the End-of-Cycle assessment, evaluates safety

performance at the Dresden plant from April 2000 through March 2001, and informs plant officials of

the NRCís plans for future inspections at the facility.

The Dresden assessment letter and inspection report are available at

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr or from the Region III Public Affairs Office. Current performance

information for the plant is available at http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html.

# # #
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-51319

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PATRICK JONES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:07-CR-22-2

Before WIENER, PRADO and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Patrick Jones, federal prisoner # 83582-180, has moved to proceed in

forma pauperis (IFP) in his appeal from the district court’s grant of relief on his

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion. Jones was sentenced in 2007 to a 360-month term

of imprisonment for his conviction of possession with intent to distribute at least

five grams of crack cocaine within 1,000 feet of a junior college. The district

court granted Jones’s § 3582(c)(2) motion and reduced Jones’s sentence of

imprisonment to 324 months.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 22, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 08-51319 Document: 00511272168 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2010
No. 08-51319

Jones’s IFP motion is a challenge to the district court’s certification that

his appeal was not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202

(5th Cir. 1997). This court may authorize Jones to proceed IFP on appeal if he

is unable to pay the costs of the appeal and the appeal is taken in good faith, i.e.,

the appeal presents nonfrivolous issues. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). “An

investigation into the [IFP] movant’s objective good faith, while necessitating a

brief inquiry into the merits of the appeal, does not require that probable success

be shown. The inquiry is limited to whether the appeal involves legal points

arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” Howard v. King, 707

F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Jones’s IFP motion discusses only his lack of sufficient funds to pay the

appellate filing fee. He has not identified any issue for appeal concerning the

district court’s disposition of his § 3582(c)(2) motion. Although this court applies

less stringent standards to parties proceeding pro se than to parties represented

by counsel and liberally construes briefs of pro se litigants, pro se parties must

still brief the issues and reasonably comply with the requirements of Rule 28 of

the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Grant v. Cuellar, 59 F.3d 523, 524

(5th Cir. 1995).

Jones has failed to demonstrate that his appeal involves legal points

arguable on their merits. See Howard, 707 F.2d at 220. Accordingly, his motion

to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED. Because the appeal is frivolous, it is

DISMISSED. See United States v. Boutwell, 896 F.2d 884, 889-90 (5th Cir.

1990); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 08-51319 Document: 00511272168 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/22/2010
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 35-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 35-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2020 Page 2 of 2
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-02-0099 - Litigation Report 2002-01

Accession Number: ML021560053

Date Released: Wednesday, June 19, 2002

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML021560057 - SECY-02-0099 -  Litigation Report 2002-01 (2 page(s), 6/3/2002)
    - ML021550058 - SECY-02-0099Atch - State of Nevada, Clark County, Nevada, and City of Las Vegas, Nevada "Petition for Review." (57 page(s), 12/27/2001)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

Case No.: 9:20-cv-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Plaintiff

 vs. 

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC.,

d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et. al. 

Defendant

___________________________________/

NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE

COMES NOW, Defendant Joseph Cole Barleta (“Cole”), by and through his Undersigned 

Counsel, and files the instant NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE.

1. On August 17, 2023, the Court instructed Joseph Cole Barleta [D.E. 1668] to demonstrate 

full compliance in the production of documents requested by the Receiver, and submit

declarations under the penalty of perjury that Cole has complied with the Courts Order.

2. The Court has given Cole and his counsel until August 22, 2023 to comply. 

3. On August 23, 2023, Cole has submitted to the Receiver additional documents that he has. 

He has no other documents to produce, and has indicated the same in his declaration. 

4. Cole has produced all of the documents he has regarding the company FL Memory Lane, 

LLC. and Helliz Abbwal, LLC., as well as all of the property related that he has in his

possession. 

5. Cole has also produced additional statements. 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1670 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2023 Page 1 of 2
6. All in all, Cole has produced an additional 112.3 megabytes of documents, or 305 

additional items. 

Respectfully submitted,

Law Offices of Andre G. Raikhelson, LLC.

Counsel for Joseph Cole Barleta

7000 W Palmetto Park Road, Suite 210

Boca Raton, Florida, 33433

Telephone:(954) 895-5566

arlaw@raikhelsonlaw.com

/s/ Andre G. Raikhelson

ANDRE G. RAIKHELSON

FBN:. 123657

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1670 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2023 Page 2 of 2
Presidential Documents

61727 

Federal Register 

Vol. 69, No. 202 

Wednesday, October 20, 2004 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 7832 of October 15, 2004 

National Mammography Day, 2004 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Approximately one in seven women in the United States will develop breast 

cancer over her lifetime. Mammograms are critical for early detection of 

breast cancer and remain the most effective screening tool available today. 

Many women who develop breast cancer have no history of the disease 

in their families, and except for growing older, most have no strong risk 

factors. Regular mammogram screening, along with a clinical breast exam 

by a medical professional, can help identify breast cancer in its earliest 

stages when it is most treatable. On National Mammography Day, we underscore the importance of this life-saving technology. 

The National Cancer Institute and the United States Preventive Services 

Task Force recommend a mammogram every 1 to 2 years for women age 

40 and over. Strict guidelines help to ensure that mammograms are administered with the lowest possible doses of radiation by the best-trained medical 

staff. Scientists continue to study ways to improve mammograms and other 

screening technologies, and this research promises to make screening even 

more accurate and further reduce the number of breast cancer deaths. 

My Administration is committed to preventing, detecting, treating, and ultimately finding a cure for breast cancer. Through an early detection program 

at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we have devoted over 

$200 million for promoting mammography use and helping low-income 

women afford screening for breast and cervical cancer. In addition, the 

National Institutes of Health is conducting the largest trial ever of new, 

early-detection technologies to help doctors target breast cancer before symptoms occur. 

My Administration will continue working to ensure that America’s women 

have access to the best screening services available. I urge women, especially 

those 40 and over, to talk to their doctors about breast cancer screening 

and to encourage their friends and family to do the same. Together, we 

can help save lives and build a healthier future for all our citizens. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 15, 2004, as 

National Mammography Day. I call on all Americans to observe this day 

with appropriate programs and activities recognizing our health care professionals and researchers for their contributions in helping to detect and 

treat breast cancer. 

61728 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 20, 2004 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fifteenth day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand four, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-ninth. 

W 

[FR Doc. 04–23621 

Filed 10–19–04; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P
#### § 18.9 New in-bond movement for forwarded or returned merchandise.

The carrier or any of the parties named in § 18.1(c) must, in accordance with the filing requirements of § 18.1, submit a new in-bond application in order to forward or return merchandise from the port of destination or port of exportation named in the original in-bond application, or from the port of diversion, to any another port. If the merchandise is moving under cover of a carnet, the carnet may be accepted as a transportation entry.
Case 0:99-cv-06625-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/1999 Page 1 of 16
Case 0:99-cv-06625-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/1999 Page 2 of 16
Case 0:99-cv-06625-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/1999 Page 3 of 16
Case 0:99-cv-06625-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/1999 Page 4 of 16
Case 0:99-cv-06625-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/1999 Page 5 of 16
Case 0:99-cv-06625-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/1999 Page 6 of 16
Case 0:99-cv-06625-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/1999 Page 7 of 16
Case 0:99-cv-06625-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/1999 Page 8 of 16
Case 0:99-cv-06625-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/1999 Page 9 of 16
Case 0:99-cv-06625-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/1999 Page 10 of 16
Case 0:99-cv-06625-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/1999 Page 11 of 16
Case 0:99-cv-06625-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/1999 Page 12 of 16
Case 0:99-cv-06625-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/1999 Page 13 of 16
Case 0:99-cv-06625-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/1999 Page 14 of 16
Case 0:99-cv-06625-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/1999 Page 15 of 16
Case 0:99-cv-06625-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/25/1999 Page 16 of 16
#### § 191.37 Destruction under Customs supervision.

A claimant may destroy merchandise and obtain unused merchandise drawback by complying with the procedures set forth in § 191.71 of this part relating to destruction.
DENY; and Opinion Filed September 6, 2019.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00941

- CV
IN RE VENKY VENKATRA MAN , Relator

O riginal Proceeding from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF04

- 11968


### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Molberg

Before the Court is relator’s August 9, 2019 petition for writ of mandam us complaining of the trial court’s May 6, 2019 final modification order in a suit affecting parent

- child relationship. Relator contends the trial court abused its discretion by signing the May 6 order because it does not comply with this Court’s August 3 0, 2017 opinion and subsequently issued mandate. To be entitled to mandamus relief, relator must show that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential I ns. Co

. of Am

. , 148 S.W.3d 1 24, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition and mandamus record, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested.– 2

–

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8( a )
( the court must deny the petition if court determines relator is not entitled to relief sought).

190941F.P05 /Ken Molberg/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
### §60f–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–213, §1(c), Sept. 1, 1959, 73 Stat. 444

Section, act June 27, 1956, ch. 453, 70 Stat. 359, authorized Senators to fix basic compensation of one employee at a rate not to exceed $8,040 per annum.