alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1818. Rental or lease of storage space

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Architect of the Capitol, with the approval of the House Office Building Commission and Senate Committee on Rules and Administration, is authorized to secure, through rental, lease, or other appropriate agreement, storage space in areas within the District of Columbia and its environs beyond the boundaries of the United States Capitol Grounds for use of the United States Senate, the United States House of Representatives, and the Office of the Architect of the Capitol, under such terms and conditions as such Commission and committee may authorize, and to incur any necessary incidental expenses in connection therewith.

(Pub. L. 93–180, §1, Dec. 13, 1973, 87 Stat. 704.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 166d of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.
October 14.2014

No. 04-14-00572-CV

Jose Luis Ramos.

Appellant

v.

Slate Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company,

Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court. Webb County. Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CVQ001953 D4

Honorable Oscar .1 I iale. Jr.. Judge Presiding

ORDER

In this Court's Order of September S. 2014. appellate deadlines in this case were suspended

until October 23. 2014. and the parties were ordered to mediation with Judge Raul Vasquez.

Appellant has filed Notice of Mediation Settlement and Request to Continue Abatement asking

for an abatement extension until November 10. 2014. lo finalize the settlement that was reached

in mediation.

The motion is granted and appellate deadlines are hereby suspended until November 10,

2014.

II is so ORDERED on October 14. 2014.

Sandee Bryan Mftnon, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, have hereunto set my hand and affixed the sejil of the said

court on this 14"' day of October, 2014.

k€ffl/H. tfottFe. Clerk
#### Gregory K. HUNT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-5148.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 2, 2002.

ORDER

The appellant having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
No: 23-021 March 10, 2023 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Authorizes Restart of National Institute of Standards and Technology Reactor

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has concluded the National Institute of Standards 

and Technology has satisfied the requirements to safely restart the NIST research reactor in 

Gaithersburg, Maryland. The facility has been safely shut down since February 2021, when an 

event damaged a reactor fuel element without affecting public health and safety.

“We’ve reached this decision after extensive review of the event, NIST’s corrective 

actions, and additional work the facility has done to ensure safe operation,” said Andrea Veil, 

director of the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. “We’re satisfied this research 

facility’s important systems and components are ready to go, and we’re satisfied the reactor staff 

are ready to carry out improved procedures for maintaining safety. We’ll continue our increased 

oversight of the facility and its ongoing corrective actions.” 

NRC approval was required before the facility could restart the reactor because the 

facility violated the fuel cladding temperature safety limit. The NRC’s technical evaluation 

report includes: review of the facility’s systems to verify there was no adverse impact from the 

event; NIST’s actions to comply with the Confirmatory Order issued in August 2022; and results 

from follow-on NRC inspections. NIST’s actions covered several areas relevant to the 2021 

event, including: fuel handling and related management activities; the facility’s safety culture 

and corrective action program; and the facility’s emergency response resources and procedures. 

The NRC also separately reviewed and approved several amendments to the facility’s license 

that were requested by NIST to support the safe restart of the facility.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-53 July 24, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING NEAR BEAVER VALLEY NUCLEAR PLANT

ON CHANGES IN REACTOR OVERSIGHT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a public meeting for Thursday, July 27, in

Beaver, Pa., to discuss the agency’s new reactor oversight process. The new process was implemented

at Beaver Valley Power Station, in Shippingport, Pa., in April.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. at the Beaver County Courthouse, 810 Third Street. Members

of the public will have the opportunity to ask questions of NRC staff during and after the meeting.

The new oversight process uses more objective, timely and safety-significant criteria in

assessing performance while seeking to more effectively and efficiently regulate the industry. Under

the new process, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional office-based personnel are

supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance indicators. These

performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant operations, including the viability of

redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection and security measures.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC’s web site every three months. The safety significance of each inspection finding or performance

indicator is characterized by a color -- green, white, yellow or red.

The NRC response to the inspection finding and performance indicators will be based on the

significance of the items. A green finding receives normal NRC oversight, while white, yellow or red

assessments receive increasing NRC involvement. Multiple red findings could result in a plant

shutdown.

A plain language summary of the reactor oversight process is available from the NRC Office of

Public Affairs or on the web site at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm

Detailed information regarding the reactor oversight process is available on the web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html

#
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 OF


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


OF ALTERRA CAPITAL HOLDINGS LIMITED


This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the Amendment No. 2 (“Amendment No.  2”) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 of Alterra Capital Holdings Limited (the “Issuer”).


I, Joseph W. Roberts, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that:


(i) the Amendment No.  2 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and


(ii) the information contained in the Amendment No.  2fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: May 10, 2013








/s/ Joseph W. RobertsName:Joseph W. RobertsTitle:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

S UPREME C OURT C AUSE N O . DA19 - 0307

GORDON WILLIAMS, GALE MADLER, TIMOTHY RUSSELL, JOYCE KELLEY, and SAM BLAYLOCK, Plaintiffs/Appellants, vs. STIL LWATER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Defendant

/Appellee . **ORDER**

Plaintiffs/Appellants file d a F ifth U nopposed Motion to Suspend the D eadlines in this case. Pursuant to the Motion, and for good cause being shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the schedule and deadlines in this ma tter, including for mediation and briefing, is suspended for an additional ninety ( 90 ) days from this date.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 23 2020

03/23/2020
Case Number: DA 19-0307
#### Industrial Bank of Commerce, Appellant, *v.*Packard Yonkers Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

First Department,

November 27, 1951.

*Henry W. Parker*of counsel *(John J. Dwyer,*attorney), for appellant.

*Max Klein*of counsel *(Klein $ Klein,*attorneys), for respondent.

*126
      *Per Curiam.*

No question has been raised that respondent purchased this automobile for a valuable consideration, and without actual notice that it was subject to a contract of conditional sale which had been assigned to appellant by a previous vendor. Appellant relies entirely upon the protection afforded by sections 64 and 65 of the Personal Property Law. The latter • section provides that every provision in a conditional sale reserving property in the seller shall be void as to any purchaser from or creditor of the buyer, who, without notice of such provision, purchases the goods or acquires by attachment or levy a lien upon them, before the contract or copy thereof shall be filed as in said statute provided. Section 64-a requires that a contract thus to be filed shall contain “ The name of the seller and the buyer.” This conditional sale contract in suit did not state the real name of the buyer, but ran. to a fictitious buyer. Consequently it was not indexed against the name of the real purchaser, by or through whom it was sold to respondent. Bespondent searched the index in the proper public filing office, but looked for the real name of the buyer rather than for his fictitious name. If the conditional vendor, or its assignee, intended to rely upon the protection of the filing statute, it was incumbent upon it to verify the name of the purchaser in order that the conditional sale contract might comply with the requirement of the statute that the name of the buyer be stated. Filing protects only conditional vendors who comply with the statute.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Vooehis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. [See *post,*p. 792.]
### §451. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 451 was editorially reclassified as section 30141 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
#### Howard HILDEBRANDT, Defendants, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 5001.

United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.

July 8, 1955.

Howard Hildebrandt, pro se.

Jacob S. Temkin, U. S. Atty., for appellee.

Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to dismiss or affirm under our Rule *26(3)*and memorandum in support thereof, and of appellant’s reply memorandum in opposition thereto, and further upon consideration of appellant’s brief on the merits and of the record on appeal consisting of the original papers, and it appearing that no substantial question is presented by this appeal,

It is ordered that the orders appealed from be and the same hereby are affirmed.
#### Marie C. Lowe, Respondent, v. Mary C. Leary and Others, Respondents, Impleaded with Daniel J. Leary, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, *958with, costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
### §60e–1a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 60e–1a was editorially reclassified as section 4555 of this title.
### §121d. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 121d was editorially reclassified as section 6576 of this title.
### §439. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 439 was editorially reclassified as section 30113 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
#### § 162.61 Importing and exporting controlled substances.

It shall be unlawful to import to or export from the United States any controlled substance or narcotic drug listed in schedules I through V of the Controlled Substances Act (Sec. 202, 84 Stat. 1247; 21 U.S.C. 812), unless there has been compliance with the provisions of said Act, the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act and the regulations of the Drug Enforcement Administration.

[T.D. 72-211, 37 FR 16488, Aug. 15, 1972, as amended by T.D. 78-99, 43 FR 13062, Mar. 29, 1978]
#### James M. Donohue, as Receiver, etc., v. City Water Power Company and Others.

Motion forreargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal granted. Order appealed from resettled as indicated in memorandum per *910curiam. Order to be settled on notice. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-02T05:26:12-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-63 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, May 1, 1998)

NRC TO MEET WITH PUBLIC IN LAS VEGAS

ON PRE-LICENSING PROGRAM FOR POSSIBLE WASTE REPOSITORY

Members of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff will meet with

the public on Wednesday, May 13, from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. in Las Vegas to discuss the

status of the agency’s pre-licensing program for a possible high-level radioactive waste

repository that the Department of Energy may build and operate at Yucca Mountain,

Nevada.

The meeting will be held at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Moyer Student

Union Building, Lounge 201, 4505 South Maryland Parkway. Interested citizens are

invited to attend and participate in the discussion. A sign-up period will begin at 5:30

p.m. for anyone wishing to make comments during the meeting.

The NRC will present an overview of its pre-licensing high-level waste repository

program and the current status. Topics will include key technical issues, issue

resolution, and the NRC’s approach to review of the DOE’s assessment of the viability

of the Yucca Mountain site for waste disposal.

Representatives of the Department of Energy will also be present to answer

questions.

After the opening presentations, interested members of the public will be invited

to comment or ask questions.

###
§ 146.63 Entry for consumption. ( a ) *Foreign merchandise.* Merchandise in foreign status or composed in part of merchandise in foreign status may be entered for consumption from a zone.
( b ) *Zone-restricted merchandise.* Merchandise in a zone-restricted status may be entered for consumption only when the Board has ruled that merchandise can be entered for consumption.
( c ) *Estimated production* — ( 1 ) *Weekly entry.* When merchandise is manufactured or otherwise changed in a zone (exclusive of packing) to its physical condition as entered within 24 hours before physical transfer from the zone for consumption, the port director may allow the person making entry to file an entry on Customs Form 3461, or its electronic equivalent, for the estimated removals of merchandise during the calendar week. The Customs Form 3461, or its electronic equivalent, must be accompanied by a *pro forma* invoice or schedule showing the number of units of each type of merchandise to be removed during the week and their zone and dutiable values. Merchandise covered by an entry made under the provisions of this section will be considered to be entered and may be removed only when the port director has accepted the entry on Customs Form 3461, or its electronic equivalent. If the actual removals will exceed the estimate for the week, the person making entry shall file an additional Customs Form 3461, or its electronic equivalent, to cover the additional units before their removal from the zone. Notwithstanding that a weekly entry may be allowed, all merchandise will be dutiable as provided in § 146.65. When estimated removals exceed actual removals, that excess merchandise will not be considered to have been entered or constructively transferred to the Customs territory.
( 2 ) *Individual transfers.* After acceptance of the weekly entry, individual transfers of merchandise covered by the entry may be made from the zone.
( d ) *Textiles and textile products.* Subject to the existing statutory authority of the Board, textiles and textile products admitted into a zone, regardless of whether the merchandise has privileged or nonprivileged foreign status, which would have been subject to quota or visa or export license requirements in their condition at the time of importation (if entered for consumption rather than admitted to a zone), may not be subsequently transferred into Customs territory for consumption if, during the time the merchandise is in the zone, there has been a change by manipulation, manufacture, or other means: ( 1 ) In the country of origin of the merchandise as defined by § 102.21 or § 102.22 of this chapter, as applicable;
( 2 ) To exempt from quota or visa or export license requirements other than a change brought about by statute, treaty, executive order or Presidential proclamation; or
( 3 ) From one textile category to another textile category.
[T.D. 86-16, 51 FR 5049, Feb. 11, 1986, as amended by CBP Dec. 05-32, 70 FR 58016, Oct. 5, 2005; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61291, Oct. 13, 2015]
|  |
|--|

|  |  |
|--|--|

| ** ** |
|------------|

|   | **Vincent Astro** 
 

**Part 1**
**Part 2****Part 3****Part 4**
**Part 5**
****

Introduction
Reading Room Index - A   B   C   D   E    F   G- H   I    J    K   L   M   N   -O   P   Q   R   S   T   U-V   W   X   Y   Z   
Electronic Reading Room
- Alphabetical Listing- Espionage-Famous Persons-Gangster Era- Historical Interest- Unusual Phenomena-Violent CrimeFBI              File Fact Sheet FOIA Request Instructions- FOIA Request Form - Privacy Waiver and Certificate of Identity Form Privacy Act Instructions- Privacy Act Request FormDOJ              Reference GuideU.S.              DOJ FOIASearch
All of these publications are in PDF (Portable Document Format). To view them you will need to have the Adobe Acrobat Reader plug-in installed on your computer. The Reader can be downloaded at no cost from Adobe's site on the World Wide Web.   If you have difficulty accessing any material on this site because of a disability, please contact us in writing or via telephone and we will work with you to make the information available.

Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Section    202-324-5520 |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-49 April 30, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC CONFIRMS BG&E’S COMMITMENTS TO ADDRESS

RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL PROGRAM WEAKNESSES AT CALVERT CLIFFS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued a confirmatory

action letter documenting commitments Baltimore Gas and Electric

Company has made to improve the radiation safety program at the

Calvert Cliffs nuclear power plant in Lusby, Maryland.

The action follows an incident on April 9, in which a worker

received an unplanned radiation exposure while working in a high

radiation area. The exposure did not exceed any regulatory limits.

Both the company and the NRC looked into the incident and determined

there were significant performance deficiencies related to this event.

In August of last year, the NRC fined the company $176,000 as a

result of significant deficiencies in radiological controls

implemented for work by divers in the Unit 2 spent fuel pool last

Spring. In response, the company spelled out corrective actions it

would take to improve its radiation protection program.

However, in the confirmatory action letter sent April 29 to the

utility, NRC Region I Administrator Hubert J. Miller said, “the

continuing occurrence of radiological control-related problems

suggests that your previous corrective actions have not been effective

in resolving deficiencies and weaknesses in this area.”

BG&E has agreed to engage an independent contractor to assess the

quality and performance of ongoing radiological control activities.

The company will inform the NRC of those findings and its planned

response to them. It has further agreed to strengthen oversight of

job-planning activities to assure that radiation controls are

effectively established and implemented.

#

EDITORS/NEWS DIRECTORS: A copy of the confirmatory action letter is

available from this office. It is also available on the NRC’s web

site (www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports).