alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
February13 , 201 2 ^ ^ CiHER/^nOM

r ^• U ft B r> \

O f . C O

I w( T o Who m I t Ma yConcern : M ywife , Linda , an d I ar e writin g i n support o fth e continuatio n th e Su n CountryAirlines ' nonsto p Lansin g t o Washington , D C rout e - specifically . Su n Countryslo t exemptio n Docke t No . FAA-2012-0089 . I spli t m ytim e commutin g betwee n Lansin g an d Washington , DC . Normall yI woul d fl yDelt a fro m Lansin g t o Detroit , an d the n pic k u p th e secon d le g o fth e fligh t fro m Detroi t t o Washington , DC . Tha t take s tw o t o thre e time s longe rtha n flyin g direc t o n Su n Country . On e als o encounter s th e possibilit yo fconnectin g flight s bein g delayed , misse d o rcancelled . Tha t doe s no t occu rwit h a direc t flight . M ywife , Linda , ha s bee n travelin g mor e frequentl yt o joi n m e i n Washington , D C ove rweekend s du e t o th e nonsto p Su n Country flight . W e strongl yurge d th e FAAan d th e U.S . Dept . o fTransportatio n t o maintai n th e current nonsto p Su n Countryflight s betwee n Lansin g an d Washington , DC . Than k yo u fo rconsiderin g ou rrequest . Sincerely , Stephe n H . Zimmerma n 30 8 Chesterfiel d Pkwy . Eas t Lansing , M l 4882 3
EXHIBIT 13.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. (the "Company") for the period ending December 31,
2004 (the "Report"), I, Naamit Salomon, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: December 19, 2005

/s/ Naamit Salomon
------------------
Naamit Salomon
Vice President, Finance
(Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,490,095
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,573,391
<ALLOWANCES>                                   643,485
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,834,890
<PP&E>                                      54,603,806
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,871,618
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             221,638,921
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,218,935
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 29,907,210
<COMMON>                                        38,858
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,284,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               221,638,921
<SALES>                                     27,768,428
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,768,428
<CGS>                                       19,510,737
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,510,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,862
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,927,622
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,959,124
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,959,124
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,138,121)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0502 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ROGER MICHAEL KEECH,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 12 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 2 2024

07/02/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0502
##### 



SECTION 1. Purpose; Definitions.
   Affiliate
 Award
 Award Year
 Board
 Cash Incentive Plan
 Cause
 Change in Control Change in Control Price
 Code
 Commission
 Committee
 Common Stock
 Company
 Employer
 Estimated Annual Growth Rate
 Exchange Act
 Fair Market Value




---



##### 



Measurement Year
 Non-Qualified Stock Option
 Plan
 Retirement
 Rule 16b-3
 Subsidiary
 Termination of Employment
 Total Disability
 Threshold Price
 Threshold-Vesting Stock Option Stock Option
  SECTION 2. Administration.




---



##### 



SECTION 3. Common Stock Subject to Plan.




---



##### 



SECTION 4. Eligibility.
  SECTION 5. Threshold-Vesting Stock Options.
      Option Price
 Option Term
 Exercisability
 Method of Exercise




---



##### 



Non-transferability of Stock Options
 Termination by Death
 Termination by Reason of Total Disability
 Termination by Reason of Retirement
 Other Termination




---



##### 



Forfeitability and Termination
 Cashing Out of Stock Option
 Change in Control Cash Out
 SECTION 6. Change in Control Provisions.
 Impact of Event
 Definition of Change in Control




---



##### 



Change in Control Price




---



##### 



SECTION 7. Term, Amendment and Termination.
     SECTION 8. Unfunded Status of Plan.
  SECTION 9. General Provisions.




---



##### 



SECTION 10. Effective Date of Plan.
### §2162a. Promoting maximum efficiency in operation of Capitol Power Plant

#### (a) Steam boilers

#### (1) In general

The Architect of the Capitol shall take such steps as may be necessary to operate the steam boilers at the Capitol Power Plant in the most energy efficient manner possible to minimize carbon emissions and operating costs, including adjusting steam pressures and adjusting the operation of the boilers to take into account variations in demand, including seasonality, for the use of the system.

#### (2) Effective date

The Architect shall implement the steps required under paragraph (1) not later than 30 days after December 19, 2007.

#### (b) Chiller plant

#### (1) In general

The Architect of the Capitol shall take such steps as may be necessary to operate the chiller plant at the Capitol Power Plant in the most energy efficient manner possible to minimize carbon emissions and operating costs, including adjusting water temperatures and adjusting the operation of the chillers to take into account variations in demand, including seasonality, for the use of the system.

#### (2) Effective date

The Architect shall implement the steps required under paragraph (1) not later than 30 days after December 19, 2007.

#### (c) Meters

Not later than 90 days after December 19, 2007, the Architect of the Capitol shall evaluate the accuracy of the meters in use at the Capitol Power Plant and correct them as necessary.

#### (d) Report on implementation

Not later than 180 days after December 19, 2007, the Architect of the Capitol shall complete the implementation of the requirements of this section and submit a report describing the actions taken and the energy efficiencies achieved to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, the Committee on House Administration of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title V, §504, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1656.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of this title.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.govNRC

No. 99-03 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, January 6, 1999)

NRC MEDIA WORKSHOP SCHEDULED FEBRUARY 23-24

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold its annual two-day workshop for news

reporters February 23-24 at its headquarters in Rockville, Maryland.

NRC senior managers and staff specialists will brief participants extensively on the

agency’s updated plant performance review system, mergers and foreign ownership of

reactors, NRC’s involvement in tritium production, year 2000 computer issues, potassium

iodide, reactor operations, dry cask storage, and other current issues. Everything will be on the

record.

The workshop should be especially useful for reporters who cover news events at

nuclear facilities near their communities. Participants will receive background materials which

may be taken home for quick reference.

There is no charge for attending the workshop, but reporters must cover their own food,

transportation, and lodging expenses. A block of rooms is being held at a moderately-priced

hotel in the vicinity of the NRC.

Because the size of the meeting room is limited, those interested in attending should

contact the NRC Office of Public Affairs by February 5, at (301) 415-8200, (e-mail:

msl@nrc.gov)

###
#### § 6.56 Statement of disagreement.

Upon receipt of a final administrative determination denying a request to amend a record, the requestor may file a Statement of Disagreement with the appropriate system manager. The Statement of Disagreement should include an explanation of why the requestor believes the record to be inaccurate, irrelevant, untimely, or incomplete. The system manager shall maintain the Statement of Disagreement in conjunction with the pertinent record, and shall include a copy of the Statement of Disagreement in any disclosure of the pertinent record. The system manager shall provide a copy of the Statement of Disagreement to any person or agency to whom the record has been disclosed only if the disclosure was subject to the accounting requirements of § 6.22.
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 21

<TABLE>
                 SUBSIDIARIES OF HUSSMANN INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<CAPTION>
Name                                                             Place of Incorporation

<S>                                                                     <C>
Hussmann Corporation                                                    Missouri
      Krack Corporation                                                 Illinois
      Hussmann International Sales Corporation                          Barbados
      Luoyang Hussmann Refrigeration Co., Ltd.<F*>                      China
      Guangzhou Hussmann Refrigeration Co., Ltd.                        China
      Hussmann Tempcool Holdings PTE LTD<F*>                            Singapore
Hussmann Holdings, Inc.                                                 Delaware
      Hussmann Netherlands B.V.                                         Netherlands
            Hussmann-Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.                         Mexico
                  Hussmann American, S. de R.L. de C.V.                 Mexico
                  Industrias Frigorificas, S.A. de C.V.                 Mexico
                  Industrias Gilvert, S.A. de C.V.                      Mexico
            Hussmann Canada Holdings, Ltd.                              Canada
                  Hussmann Canada Inc.                                  Canada
            Hussmann Holdings, Ltd.                                     England
                  Hussmann (Europe) Limited                             England
                        Hussmann Refrigeration (Hungary) KFT<F*>        Hungary
            Hussmann do Brasil Ltda.                                    Brazil
            Fastecnica Instalacoes e Assistencia Tecnica Ltda.          Brazil
            Hussmann Region Andina SRL                                  Chile
            Hussmann Australasia Limited<F*>                            New Zealand
                  McAlpine Hussmann Limited                             New Zealand
                  McAlpine Hussmann (Australia) Pty Ltd.                Australia
                        McAlpine Hussmann Pty Ltd.                      Australia
                        McAlpine Australia Pty Ltd.                     Australia
            Hussmann Iberica S.L.                                       Spain
                  Koxka C.E., S.A.                                      Spain
                        Compania de Refrigeracion Vedereca, S.A.        Spain
                        Kobol, S.A.                                     Spain
                        Baes Industria Del Frio, S.A.                   Spain

<FN>
      <F*> Each of the above subsidiaries is 100% owned or controlled except
as follows: Hussmann Tempcool Holdings PTE LTD (50%), Hussmann Refrigeration
(Hungary) Ltd. (60%), Luoyang Hussmann Refrigeration Co., Ltd. (55%) and
Hussmann Australasia Limited (65%).
</TABLE>
### §1503. Exclusions

This chapter shall not apply to any provision in a bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report before Congress and any provision in a proposed or final Federal regulation that—

(1) enforces constitutional rights of individuals;

(2) establishes or enforces any statutory rights that prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, handicap, or disability;

(3) requires compliance with accounting and auditing procedures with respect to grants or other money or property provided by the Federal Government;

(4) provides for emergency assistance or relief at the request of any State, local, or tribal government or any official of a State, local, or tribal government;

(5) is necessary for the national security or the ratification or implementation of international treaty obligations;

(6) the President designates as emergency legislation and that the Congress so designates in statute; or

(7) relates to the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance program under title II of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 401 et seq.] (including taxes imposed by sections 3101(a) and 3111(a) of title 26 (relating to old-age, survivors, and disability insurance)).

(Pub. L. 104–4, §4, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 49.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 104–4, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 48, known as the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1501 of this title and Tables.

The Social Security Act, referred to in par. (7), is act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, 49 Stat. 620. Title II of the Act is classified generally to subchapter II (§401 et seq.) of chapter 7 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1305 of Title 42 and Tables.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

VICTUAL MCNEAL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1786

[September 27, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ernest A. Kollra, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 10-18330 CF10A.

Victual McNeal, Indiantown, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., TAYLOR and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 779 

To provide that certain rules and guidance related to waivers for State 

innovation under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act shall 

have no force or effect. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 16, 2021 

Mr. WARNER (for himself, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. CARDIN, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. 

CARPER, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. PETERS, Mr. REED, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. 

KAINE, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. MENENDEZ, Ms. SMITH, Mr. MERKLEY, 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. BOOKER, 

Mr. DURBIN, Mr. LUJA ́N, Mr. MARKEY, Ms. WARREN, Ms. ROSEN, Ms. 

KLOBUCHAR, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. CASEY, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. WYDEN, 

Mr. TESTER, and Mr. PADILLA) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide that certain rules and guidance related to waivers 

for State innovation under the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act shall have no force or effect. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Americans 

5 with Pre-Existing Conditions Act of 2021’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 779 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROVIDING THAT CERTAIN RULES AND GUIDANCE 

2 RELATED TO WAIVERS FOR STATE INNOVA3 TION UNDER THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND 

4 AFFORDABLE CARE ACT SHALL HAVE NO 

5 FORCE OR EFFECT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Health and 

7 Human Services and the Secretary of the Treasury may 

8 not take any action to implement, enforce, or otherwise 

9 give effect to the rules and guidance described in sub10 section (b), and no such rules and guidance shall have any 

11 force or effect. 

12 (b) RULES AND GUIDANCE.—The rules and guidance 

13 described in this subsection are the following: 

14 (1) The provisions in the final rule issued by 

15 the Secretary of Health and Human Services and 

16 the Secretary of the Treasury on January 19, 2021, 

17 relating to ‘‘Updates to State Innovation Waiver 

18 (Section 1332 Waiver) Implementing Regulations’’ 

19 (86 Fed. Reg. 6138). 

20 (2) The guidance issued by such Secretaries en21 titled ‘‘State Relief and Empowerment Waivers’’ (83 

22 Fed. Reg. 53575 (October 24, 2018)), or any other 

23 rule promulgated to give effect to such guidance. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-105 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, June 29, 1998)

NRC STAFF AUTHORIZES NORTHEAST UTILITIES TO BEGIN

RESTART OF MILLSTONE UNIT 3

L. Joseph Callan, Executive Director for Operations of the

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, has given his approval for

Northeast Nuclear Energy Company to begin restart activities at

the Millstone Unit 3 nuclear power plant at Waterford,

Connecticut.

Mr. Callan acted to approve commencement of restart

activities after the NRC staff verified that the utility had

resolved several final technical and programmatic issues that

remained before the unit could resume operations. Over the past

several weeks, there have been a number of issues, including one

which was recently identified, that the NRC staff has been

closely following. The NRC staff carefully monitored the

licensee’s actions and also conducted its own independent

assessment. Though there may be some issues that could result in

NRC enforcement actions, the staff did not identify any safety

problems or programmatic issues that would preclude restart

approval. Northeast Energy formally notified the NRC today that

Unit 3 was ready to commence restart activities.

Once restart begins, the NRC will monitor closely the

restart and power ascension of Unit 3, including round-the-clock

control room coverage by inspectors during key phases of the

process. Northeast Energy’s plan for restart and power ascension

operations is designed to proceed in a gradual, deliberate

manner. This plan calls for Northeast to discuss with the NRC

its successive evaluations at “hold points” of approximately 30,

50, 75 and 90 percent power. The NRC has acknowledged

Northeast’s written commitment to discuss the results of its

assessments at each hold point. The NRC will independently

assess the plant’s readiness, and Northeast Energy must

adequately act on any NRC concerns before the facility can

proceed to the next level. The NRC will also review the
company’s 100-percent power level assessment before concurring

that the restart and power ascension process has been

successfully completed. The NRC staff plans to discuss with the

utility the overall assessment results in a public meeting to be

held near the plant.

The Commission voted on June 15 to transfer restart

authorization for Millstone Unit 3 to Mr. Callan, the NRC’s chief

staff executive, after two earlier public briefings on corrective

measures Northeast Energy has taken since the unit was shut down

in March 1996. That action moved it from “Category 3" to

“Category 2" on the NRC Watch List of plants under special

scrutiny. Two companion facilities, Millstone Units 1 and 2,

which are also shut down, remain “Category 3" plants, requiring

votes by the Commission before they may restart.

###
### Input and Output Files for the Full-Scale Modeling for

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment for Coal Combu stion Residuals At the time of the proposed rule, the ftp site ftp://ftp.epa.gov/coal-combustion-residues contained the following files:

 CCW.zip --

 CCW_GW_Modeling_System --

 CCR_Inputs_Outputs_7_14_2010.zip -- For the final rule, EPA is placing nine additional input and output files onto the FTP site. These new input and output files, in conjunction with the revised risk assessment available in the docket, are meant to increase the transparency of the risk assessment, and allow interested stakeholders to duplicate EPA’s results. The new files include the following:

 LF_Inputs_Chem_Tables.zip – 171 MB

 SI_Inputs_Chem_Tables (1 of 2).zip – 480 MB

 SI_Inputs_Chem_Tables (2 of 2).zip – 134 MB

 LF_Outputs_GW_HH.zip – 35.6 MB

 LF_Outputs_SW_Eco.zip – 9.28 MB

 LF_Outputs_SW_HH.zip – 32.5 MB

 SI_Outputs_GW_HH.zip – 217 MB

 SI_Outputs_SW_Eco.zip – 62.8 MB

 SI_Outputs_SW_HH.zip – 134 MB The first three files contain the inputs used in ea ch iteration of the probabilistic analysis. Users w ill note that all landfill inputs have been included in a single file (“LF_Inputs_Chem_Tables.zip”), whereas surface impoundment inputs are broken into two files [“SI_Inputs_Chem_Tables (1 of 2)” and “SI_Inputs_Chem_Tables (2 of 2).zip”] due to th e larger file size, which results from the inputs for the additional nine constituents modeled for th ese units. The remaining six files contain the outputs generat ed from each iteration. Output files are denoted with the following abbreviations: landfill (LF), su rface impoundment (SI), ground water (GW), surface water (SW), human health risk (HH), and eco logical risk (Eco). For each file, results for all constituents modeled for that scenario are included

. For questions about these files, please contact Jas on Mills of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Resource Conservation and Recover y (ORCR), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW (5305P), Washington, DC 20460.
Email: mills.jason@epa.gov Phone: (703) 305-9091