alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-175 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, November 25, 1997)

NRC REVISES ITS REGULATIONS TO ELIMINATE FIVE SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

ASSOCIATED WITH INTERNAL THREATS AT NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is revising its regulations to change five security

requirements associated with internal threats at commercial nuclear power plants.

The action follows the NRC’s reconsideration of nuclear power plant physical security

requirements to identify parts of its requirements that are considered marginal to safety,

redundant, or no longer effective. This change will reduce the regulatory burden on licensees

without compromising physical protection against radiological sabotage required for public

health and safety.

NRC’s proposed rule, published in February, drew eight letters of comment from utilities

and one from an industry group. All generally supported the rulemaking.

The final rule, which takes effect 45 days from the date of publication in an upcoming

issue of the Federal Register, changes:

1. Search requirements for on-duty guards.

2. Requirements for escort of licensees’ vehicles.

3. Control of contractor employee badges.

4. Maintenance of access lists for each vital area.

5. Key controls for vital areas.

#
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93021, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 151.70 Method of sampling by Customs.

A general sample shall be taken from each sampling unit, unless it is not feasible to obtain a representative general sample of the wool or hair in a sampling unit or to test such a sample in accordance with the provisions of § 151.71. At the request of the importer, two general samples may be taken from a sampling unit if the taking and testing of a second general sample is feasible. If two general samples are taken, one general sample shall be held for use in making a second test for clean yield if such a test is requested in accordance with the provisions of § 151.71(c), or if a second test is found desirable by the Center director or the chief chemist.

[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17470, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 93-52, 58 FR 37854, July 14, 1993]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of EntreMed, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, James S. Burns, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report. This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by
the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (or equivalent) with the
requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be
used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by
law. November 9, 2004
    /s/ James S. BurnsJames S. BurnsPresident and CEO
§ 171.53 Ruling on petition for expedited procedures. ( a ) *Final administrative determination.* Upon receipt of a petition filed pursuant to § 171.52, Customs shall determine first whether a final administrative determination of the case can be made within 21 days of the seizure. If such a final administrative determination is made within 21 days, no further action need be taken under this subpart.
( b ) *Determination within 20 days.* If no such final administrative determination is made within 21 days of the seizure, Customs shall within 20 days after the receipt of the petition make a determination as follows: ( 1 ) If Customs determines that the factors listed in § 171.52(c) have been established, it shall terminate the administrative proceedings and release the property from seizure, or in the case of a commercial fishing industry vessel for which a summons has been issued, but not yet answered, dismiss the summons. The property shall not be returned if it is evidence of a violation of law.
( 2 ) If Customs determines that the factors listed in § 171.52(c) have not been established, it shall proceed with the administrative forfeiture.
[T.D. 89-86, 54 FR 37602, Sept. 11, 1989]
Certification

I, William J. Dore', Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made know to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

November 8, 2004

                                                                                                                         /S/ WILLIAM J. DORE'

                                                                                                                          William J. Dore'

                                                                                                                          Chief Executive Officer
§ 190.27 Time limitations for manufacturing drawback. ( a ) *Direct identification.* Drawback will be allowed on imported merchandise used to manufacture or produce articles that are exported or destroyed under CBP supervision within 5 years after importation of the merchandise identified to support the claim.
( b ) *Substitution.* Drawback will be allowed on the imported merchandise if the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The designated merchandise is used in manufacture or production within 5 years after importation;
( 2 ) Within the 5-year period described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the exported or destroyed articles, or drawback products, were manufactured or produced; and
( 3 ) The completed articles must be exported or destroyed under CBP supervision within 5 years of the date of importation of the designated merchandise, or within 5 years of the earliest date of importation associated with a drawback product.
( c ) *Drawback claims filed before specific or general manufacturing drawback ruling approved or acknowledged.* Drawback claims may be filed before the letter of notification of intent to operate under a general manufacturing drawback ruling covering the claims is acknowledged (§ 190.7), or before the specific manufacturing drawback ruling covering the claims is approved (§ 190.8), but no drawback will be paid until such acknowledgement or approval, as appropriate.
#### Grand Paint Supply Co., Inc., Suing on Behalf of Itself and All Other Creditors Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. P. S. Painting Corporation et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER III—CONCILIATION OF LABOR DISPUTES; NATIONAL EMERGENCIES
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6579

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Petitioner - Appellee,

versus

KEITH DARNELL BILLINGS,

Respondent - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District

Judge. (CR-99-249-4-2; CA-01-2315-4-12)

Submitted: July 15, 2004 Decided: July 22, 2004

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Darnell Billings, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker

Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Keith Darnell Billings, a federal prisoner, seeks to

appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion

filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken

from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Billings has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

Board of Directors
Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc.
Springfield, Missouri

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-47241, 333-31196 and 333-65544 on Forms S-8 of Guaranty Federal Bancshares,
Inc. of our report dated July 27, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. as of June 30, 2001 and 2000, and
the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2001,
which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Guaranty Federal
Bancshares, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2001.

                                  /s/ BKD, LLP

September 27, 2001
Springfield, Missouri
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                            AND REPORT ON SCHEDULES
 
   
    We consent to the inclusion in this Form 10-K/A of Big City Radio, Inc. of
our report dated September 19, 1997, on our audit of the financial statements of
Big City Radio, Inc. and to the references to our firm under the caption
"Selected Financial Data".
    
 
    Our audit of the financial statements referred to in our aforementioned
report also included the financial statement schedule of Big City Radio, Inc.
listed in Item 27.1. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of
the Corporation's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based
on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
 
                                          /s/ Holtz Rubenstein & Co., LLP
                                          HOLTZ RUBENSTEIN & CO., LLP
 
   
Melville, New York
April 7, 1998
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSubsonic and transonic pressure measurements on a high-aspect-ratio supercritical-wing model with oscillating control surfacesA high aspect ratio supercritical wing with oscillating control surfaces is described. The semispan wing model was instrumented with 252 static orifices and 164 in situ dynamic pressure gases for studying the effects of control surface position and sinusoidal motion on steady and unsteady pressures. Data from the present test (this is the second in a series of tests on this model) were obtained in the Langley Transonic Dynamics Tunnel at Mach numbers of 0.60 and 0.78 and are presented in tabular form.Document ID19850009695Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSandford, M. C.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Ricketts, R. H.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Watson, J. J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1981Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-83201L-14831NAS 1.15:83201Accession Number85N18004Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850009695.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §58. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 58 was editorially reclassified as section 6314 of this title.
§ 148.62 Declaration and entry of articles by crewmembers. ( a ) *Declaration required.* Articles which are to be landed by a crewmember, including any person traveling on board a vessel, vehicle, or aircraft engaged in international traffic who is returning from a trip on which he was employed as a crewmember, shall be declared upon arrival of the vessel, vehicle, or aircraft in the United States. When practicable, the clearance of articles through Customs shall be made and permission to unlade obtained before the articles are taken from the carrier. However, if no danger to the revenue will result, articles may be submitted for examination and clearance to the Customs office on the pier or at the landing place.
( b ) *Form of declaration* — ( 1 ) *Oral declaration.* A crewmember may be permitted to make an oral declaration and entry if all articles he has to declare, in addition to articles for use in port on temporary leave for which no entry is required in accordance with § 148.63, may be admitted free of duty and tax under section 321(a)(2)(B), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(B)) (See § 148.64).
( 2 ) *Written declaration.* A written declaration on Customs Form 5129, Crewmember's Declaration shall be required in any case in which an oral declaration is not permitted. A written declaration may be required in any case if necessary to effect prompt and orderly clearance of crewmembers and their effects or if deemed necessary to protect the revenue.
( c ) *Transfer without declaration.* Articles belonging to a crewmember may be transferred from one carrier to another in international traffic without declaration, entry, or assessment of duty if the transfer is carried out under the supervision of Customs officers, or by a bonded cartman if necessary.
( d ) *Entry at port where articles to be landed.* Articles in the possession of or owned by a crewmember of a character for which entry must be made when they are brought into the United States shall be entered at the port where the articles are to be landed. However, if the crewmember remains on a vessel, vehicle, or aircraft which is to proceed to another port of the United States in a movement in which entry of the vessel, vehicle, or aircraft will not be required, entry of the articles shall be made at the port at which such movement begins.
( e ) *Collection of duty and taxes.* Any duties and taxes found due shall be collected as in the case of arriving passengers.
[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. 78-99, 43 FR 13061, Mar. 29, 1978]
1 The Honorable William A. Knox, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-1410

___________ Union Electric Company, doing * business as Ameren UE, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. James Devine, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: November 12, 2010 Filed: November 17, 2010

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In a prior appeal, this court affirmed the district court’s 1 November 2007 and January 2008 orders holding James Devine in contempt and directing him to take action to remove certain docks and structures on his lake property, to reimburse Union Electric Company (UE) for its cost in re moving a derelict houseboa t, and to pay UE’s attorneys’ fees. See Union Electric Co. v. Devine , 334 Fed. Appx. 37 (8th Cir. 2009)-2- (unpublished per curiam). Devine now appeals an order entered in January 2010, granting UE’s motion for entry of judgment against him in the amount of $32,643.02, which includes UE’s new expenses in en forcing the November2007 order and unpaid amounts awarded earlier. Because Devine’s arguments all relate only to matters resolved during the previous appeal, we affirm. See In re Just Brakes Corp. Sys., Inc. , 293 F.3d 1069, 1072 (8th Cir. 2002) (law-of-the -case doctrine prevents relitigation of issues resolved in earlier proceedings).

______________________________
***THE ECOSYSTEM APPROACH:***
§ 122.166 Arrival, departure, discharge, and documentation. ( a ) *Liability for civil penalties.* Except as otherwise provided, any aircraft pilot violation of the requirements of section 433, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 1433), with respect to the following actions shall be liable for civil penalties as provided by section 436, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1436), and described in paragraph (c) of this section: ( 1 ) Advance notification of arrival;
( 2 ) Report of arrival;
( 3 ) Landing of aircraft;
( 4 ) Presentation of documentation;
( 5 ) Departure from the port, place, or airport of arrival without authorization; or
( 6 ) Discharge of passenger, or merchandise (to include baggage) without authorization.
( b ) *Liability for criminal penalties.* Upon conviction, any aircraft pilot violating any of the Customs requirements described in paragraph (a) of this section shall, in addition to civil penalties be subject to criminal penalties as set forth in section 436, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 1436), and described in paragraph (c) of this section. If the aircraft has or is discovered to have had on board any merchandise (other than the equivalent, for a vessel, of sea stores) the importation of which into the U.S. is prohibited, that person shall be subject to an additional fine as set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1436 and described in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Civil and criminal penalties described* — ( 1 ) *Civil penalty.* The pilot of any aircraft who fails to comply with the requirements of this section is liable for a civil penalty of $5,000 for the first violation, and $10,000 for each subsequent violation. Any aircraft used in connection with any such violation is subject to seizure and forfeiture.
( 2 ) *Criminal penalty.* In addition to the civil penalty prescribed for violation of this section, the pilot of any aircraft who intentionally fails to comply with the requirements of this section is liable, upon conviction, for a fine of not more than $2,000 or imprisonment for 1 year, or both. If the aircraft is found to have, or to have had, on board any merchandise the importation of which is prohibited, such individual is liable for an additional fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both.
( 3 ) *Additional civil penalty.* If any merchandise, other than the equivalent of vessel sea stores, is imported or brought into the U.S. aboard an aircraft which has failed to comply with the requirements prescribed by this section, the pilot of the aircraft shall be liable for a civil penalty equal to the value of the merchandise, and the merchandise may be seized and forfeited, unless properly entered by the importer or consignee.
#### §§ 296.6-296.9 [Reserved]