alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23380]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[OR-957-00-1420-BJ: GP05-0001]


Filing of Plats of Survey: Oregon/Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plats of survey of the following described lands were 
officially filed in the Oregon State Office, Portland, Oregon, on 
August 11, 2004.

Willamette Meridian

Oregon

T. 29 S., R. 8 W., accepted May 20, 2004
T. 32\1/2\ S., R. 33 E., accepted May 20, 2004
T. 33 S., R. 33 E., accepted May 20, 2004
T. 37 S., R. 2 E., accepted May 20, 2004
T. 39 S., R. 13 W., accepted May 20, 2004
T. 15 S., R. 8 W., accepted May 28, 2004
T. 22 S., R. 10 E., accepted May 28, 2004
T. 7 S., R. 3 E., accepted June 8, 2004
T. 9 S., R. 3 E., accepted June 8, 2004
T. 12 S., R. 2 E., accepted June 8, 2004
T. 15 S., R. 7 W., accepted June 8, 2004
T. 22 S., R. 4 W., accepted June 8, 2004
T. 1 N., R. 34 E., accepted June 24, 2004
T. 23 S., R. 3 W., accepted June 24, 2004
T. 23 S., R. 4 W., accepted June 24, 2004
T. 25 S., R. 2 W., accepted June 24, 2004
T. 27 S., R. 11 W., accepted June 24, 2004
T. 33 S., R. 5 W., accepted June 24, 2004
T. 38 S., R. 4 W., accepted June 24, 2004

Washington

T. 31 N., R. 1 E., accepted May 20, 2004
T. 23 N., R. 11 W., accepted July 13, 2004

    The plat of survey of the following described lands is scheduled to 
be officially filed in the Oregon State Office, Portland, Oregon, 
thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this publication.

Oregon

T. 16 S., R. 16 E., accepted September 7, 2004
T. 17 S., R. 16 E., accepted September 7, 2004

    A copy of the plats may be obtained from the Public Room at the 
Oregon State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 333 S.W. 1st Avenue, 
Portland, Oregon 97204, upon required payment. A person or party who 
wishes to protest against a survey must file a notice that they wish to 
protest (at the above address) with the State Director, Bureau of Land 
Management, Portland, Oregon.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chief, Branch of Geographic Sciences, 
Bureau of Land Management, (333 SW. 1st Avenue) P.O. Box 2965, 
Portland, Oregon 97208.

    Dated: October 7, 2004.
Robert D. DeViney, Jr.,
Branch of Realty and Records Services.
[FR Doc. 04-23380 Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
#### Gerald G. SIMMONDS, Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-7106.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 24, 2002.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of Gerald G. Simmonds’ unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss his appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MAXXIS GROUP, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED 
JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         372,000
<SECURITIES>                                    10,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  316,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (40,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    218,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               959,000
<PP&E>                                         169,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (45,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,263,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          779,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    200,000
<COMMON>                                       574,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (290,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,263,000
<SALES>                                      6,991,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,991,000
<CGS>                                        2,076,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,085,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,009,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (96,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (96,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (96,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), National Marine Manufacturers Association (“NMMA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: National Marine Manufacturers Association, Chicago, IL. The nature and scope of NMMA's standards development activities are: to develop, promulgate and make available voluntary lubricant performance standards for the marine industry. NMMA establishes performance standards and testing procedures for marine engine oils to assist boaters and manufacturers in identifying engine oils which have been specially formulated to withstand the rigors of use in marine engines. NMMA's voluntary consensus standards are developed by NMMA members with comments from the public. NMMA members include original equipment manufacturers, test laboratories, oil marketers and oil additive companies.

Additional information concerning NMMA can be obtained from Tom Marhevko at NMMA at (312) 946-6213.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-23524  Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-99-29 April 27, 1999

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF FINDS IMPROVEMENTS AT CLINTON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

SUFFICIENT FOR RESUMPTION OF OPERATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has determined that improvements at the

Clinton Nuclear Power Station are sufficient for the plant to resume operations. The plant,

operated by Illinois Power Company, is near Clinton, Illinois.

The Clinton plant has been shut down since September 1996 for repairs, modification of

safety systems, and performance improvement activities.

The NRC has performed extensive inspections over the past several months to assess

the performance improvement initiatives and equipment maintenance and modifications

undertaken by the utility.

James Dyer, NRC Regional Administrator, in a letter to the utility said, "Illinois Power's

performance improvement initiatives have been sufficiently implemented to support restart of

the Clinton Nuclear Power Station."

The NRC will monitor the startup activities at Clinton on a round-the-clock basis for

about two weeks. This in-depth inspection will involve the resident inspectors, region-based

inspectors, and inspectors from other regions.

Following the startup inspection, the NRC will meet with Illinois Power officials to discuss

the inspection findings and the utility's continuing performance improvement activities.

The NRC has also issued two other letters to the utility:

-- Closing the utility's commitments in response to a Confirmatory Action Letter

regarding the investigation of an electrical circuit breaker failure in August 1997 and

subsequent corrective actions. NRC inspections showed that the utility's corrective actions

provided reasonable assurance that "all safety related [circuit] breakers will function when

called upon."

-- Indicating that the utility had satisfactorily responded to an NRC Demand for

Information, issued in September 1997, on the utility's corrective action program. The agency

concluded that the planned and completed measures "established a basis for reasonable

assurance that the corrective action program was effective."

The three letters to the utility are available on the NRC's internet web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports/clinton.htm
#####
#### Pocono Forestry Corporation, Respondent, v. Martha C. Price et al., Individually and Doing Business as Staten Island Marine Service, Defendants, and Martha C. Price et al., Appellants.

Action to recover damages because of failure of defendants to accept and pay for wagons which they had contracted to purchase from plaintiff. Order denying motion to dismiss the second cause of action for insufficiency reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. An action for fraud, in addition to that based on breach of contract, is not maintainable *813under the facts pleaded hereon. The agreement to accept the wagons and to pay therefor was merged in the contract as pleaded, and no fraud extraneous thereto is alleged which is essential, as distinguished from action on contract, to recovery of damages. *(Adams*v. *Gillig,*199 N. Y. 314, 318, 320; *Crossways Apartments Corporation*V. *Amante,*213 App. Div. 430, 437; *Brick*v. Cohn*Hall-Marw Co.,*276 N. Y. 259, 265.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. [See *post,*p. 857.]
§ 144.1 Merchandise eligible for warehousing. ( a ) *Types of merchandise.* Any merchandise subject to duty may be entered for warehousing except for perishable merchandise and explosive substances (other than firecrackers). Dangerous and highly flammable merchandise, though not classified as explosive, shall not be entered for warehouse without the written consent of the insurance company insuring the warehouse in which the merchandise is to be stored.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Merchandise previously entered.* If merchandise has been entered under other than a warehouse entry and has remained in continuous Customs custody, a warehouse entry may be substituted for the previous entry. If estimated duties were deposited with the superseded previous entry, that entry shall be liquidated for refund of the estimated duties without awaiting liquidation of the warehouse entry. All copies of the warehouse entry shall bear the following notation: This entry is in substitution of _______________________; entry No. ____________, dated ________________________.
[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17464, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 82-204, 47 FR 49376, Nov. 1, 1982; T.D. 84-149, 49 FR 28699, July 16, 1984]
Second Department,

October, 1943.

(October 4, 1943.)

#### In the Matter of the Application of Benjamin Neuwirth for Admission to Practice as an Attorney.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
### §143b. Payments in advance for subscriptions or other charges

From and after October 1, 1980, payments in advance for subscriptions or other charges for bibliographical data, publications, materials in any other form, and services may be made by the Librarian of Congress whenever he determines it to be more prompt, efficient, or economical to do so in the interest of carrying out required Library programs.

(Pub. L. 96–536, §101(c), Dec. 16, 1980, 94 Stat. 3167.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is based on section 204 of title II of H.R. 7593, as passed the House of Representatives on July 21, 1980, and incorporated by reference in section 101(c) of Pub. L. 96–536, to be effective as if enacted into law.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 96–86, §101(c) [H.R. 4390, title II, §204], Oct. 12, 1979, 93 Stat. 657.

Pub. L. 95–391, title II, §204, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 786.

Pub. L. 95–94, title II, §204, Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 677.

Pub. L. 94–440, title VIII, §804, Oct. 1, 1976, 90 Stat. 1457.

Pub. L. 94–59, title VII, §704, July 25, 1975, 89 Stat. 295.

Pub. L. 93–371, Aug. 13, 1974, 88 Stat. 441.

Pub. L. 93–145, Nov. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 545.

Pub. L. 92–342, July 10, 1972, 86 Stat. 447.

Pub. L. 92–51, July 9, 1971, 85 Stat. 142.

Pub. L. 91–382, Aug. 18, 1970, 84 Stat. 823.

Pub. L. 91–145, Dec. 12, 1969, 83 Stat. 357.

Pub. L. 90–417, July 23, 1968, 82 Stat. 411.

Pub. L. 90–57, July 28, 1967, 81 Stat. 140.
July 14, 2011

Ms. Michelle Lee Oliver Falwell Aviation, Inc. d.b.a. Freedom Aviation 310 Hangar Road Lynchburg, VA 24502

Dear Ms. Oliver

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulati ons (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your July 1, 2011, exemption request on behalf of Falwell Aviation, Inc. d.b.a. Freedom Aviation into the public docket (No. FAA-2011-0729), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

 The specific reasons why you need to exercise the privileges of your exemption outside

the United States.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/ Ida M. Klepper Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-103 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, July 7, 1997)

NRC RENEWS LICENSE FOR GE'S FUEL FABRICATION FACILITY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has renewed General

Electric Company's license to manufacture nuclear fuel at a plant

in Wilmington, North Carolina. The renewed license will extend

until June 2007.

GE manufactures nuclear fuel at the Wilmington facility for

boiling water reactors in the United States and other countries.

The facility began operations in January 1969 under a license

from the Atomic Energy Commission. This is the fourth renewal of

GE's license for the plant.

The facility converts enriched uranium gas into uranium

dioxide powder, which is then pressed into fuel pellets that are

about one-half inch long and one-third inch in diameter. The

pellets are then loaded into fuel rods to be used in nuclear

power reactors. Scrap uranium is recovered and reused in the

manufacturing process.

The NRC conducted a comprehensive review of the safety of

GE's manufacturing operations, management qualifications and

procedures. The agency concluded that the company's proposed

continued operation of the Wilmington plant will comply with NRC

requirements and will adequately protect the public health and

safety. Results of the review are documented in an NRC safety

evaluation report. NRC coordinated its review with the state of

North Carolina.

The NRC also prepared an environmental assessment of the

proposed license renewal and concluded that the renewal will not

significantly impact the environment. The agency published this

conclusion in the Federal Register for public comments on May 12

and offered an opportunity for a public hearing. No public

commments or requests for a hearing were received.

###
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.440 Right to make post-importation claim and refund duties.

Notwithstanding any other available remedy, where a good would have qualified as an originating good when it was imported into the United States but no claim for preferential tariff treatment was made, the importer of that good may file a claim for a refund of any excess duties at any time within one year after the date of importation of the good in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 10.441 of this subpart. Subject to the provisions of § 10.416 of this subpart, CBP may refund any excess duties by liquidation or reliquidation of the entry covering the good in accordance with § 10.442(c) of this part.

[CBP Dec. 05-07, 70 FR 10873, Mar. 7, 2005, as amended by CBP Dec. 06-39, 71 FR 76133, Dec. 20, 2006]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2005, of Synagro Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
C. Boucher, Jr., certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company and that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


                                        /s/ Robert C. Boucher, Jr.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert C. Boucher, Jr.
                                        August 10, 2005
### §61c. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 94–59, title I, July 25, 1975, 89 Stat. 270, which set the compensation for certain positions in office of Secretary of Senate, was omitted for lack of general applicability.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 61c, acts Aug. 5, 1955, ch. 568, §1, 69 Stat. 499; June 27, 1956, ch. 453, 70 Stat. 356; Aug. 21, 1959, Pub. L. 86–176, 73 Stat. 398; Aug. 10, 1961, Pub. L. 87–130, 75 Stat. 320, set basic annual compensation of certain positions in office of Secretary of Senate.
Exhibit 23.1

 

****

** **

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the use of our reports dated March 1, 2012 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of TransAlta Corporation as at December 31, 2011 and 2010 and January 1, 2010 and for the two years ended December 31, 2011, included as an exhibit to TransAlta Corporation’s amended Annual Report on Form 40-F/A for 2011, dated September 24, 2012 and with respect to internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, included as an exhibit to TransAlta Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for 2011, dated March 2, 2012.

 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

 

(1)  Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-72454 and No. 333-101470) pertaining to TransAlta Corporation’s Share Option Plan

 

(2)  Registration Statements (Form F-10 No. 333-170465 and No. 333-162418) pertaining to the registration of Debt and Equity Securities of TransAlta Corporation

 

of our reports dated March 1, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of TransAlta Corporation as at December 31, 2011 and 2010 and January 1, 2010 and for the two years ended December 31, 2011, included as an exhibit to TransAlta Corporation’s amended Annual Report on Form 40-F/A for 2011, dated September 24, 2012 and with respect to internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, included as an exhibit to TransAlta Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for 2011, dated March 2, 2012.

 

 

signed “Ernst & Young LLP”

 
| Calgary, Alberta |   | Chartered Accountants   |
|------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|

September 24, 2012

 

 

----
§ 306.2 Award requirements. EDA selects Projects for Local and National Technical Assistance Investments in accordance with the general evaluation and selection criteria set forth in part 301 of this chapter and the extent to which the Project: ( a ) Strengthens the capacity of local, State or national organizations and institutions to undertake and promote effective economic development programs targeted to Regions of distress;
( b ) Benefits distressed Regions;
( c ) Demonstrates innovative approaches to stimulate economic development in distressed Regions;
( d ) Is consistent with an EDA-approved CEDS, as applicable, for the Region in which the Project is located; and
( e ) Meets the criteria outlined in the applicable FFO.
### §31b–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 31b–1 was editorially reclassified as former section 5125 of this title.