alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit No. 32.1


Truewest Corporation


File No.  33-56574


Form 10-Q


Quarter ended December 31, 2010





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Truewest Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn A. Little, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: February 3, 2010
By:
/s/ Glenn A. LittleGlenn A. LittleChief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Truewest Corporation and will be retained by Truewest Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Randall Tetsuo WONG, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 99-10587.

D.C. No. CR-99-00223-HG.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 24, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, WARDLAW and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Randall Tetsuo Wong appeals his 63-month sentence following his guilty plea to: (1) possession with intent to distribute in excess of 50 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); and (2) possession of a firearm by an unlawful user of a controlled substance, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3). Wong challenges the district court’s grouping of these offenses based on its finding that the firearm possession was in connection with the drug offense. As a result of this finding, the district court imposed a two-level enhancement for possession of a deadly weapon under U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(b)(l) (requiring two-level increase if firearm was possessed) and denied a two-level decrease under U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(b)(6), because Wong failed to meet the requirements of U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

We review de novo a district court’s decision regarding the grouping of offenses. *United States v. Boos,*127 F.3d 1207, 1208 (9th Cir.1997). We review for clear error the district court’s finding that the defendant possessed a firearm during the commission of a narcotics offense. *United States v. Lopez-Sandoval,*146 F.3d 712, 714 (9th Cir.1998).

Because a firearm was found in Wong’s possession, to avoid an enhancement under § 2D1.1(b)(1), Wong bore the burden of proving that it was clearly improbable that *622he possessed the weapon in connection with his 21 U.S.C. § 841 offense conduct. *See United States v. Restrepo,*884 F.2d 1294, 1296 (9th Cir.1989). Based on our review of the record, we cannot say that the district court clearly erred by finding that Wong had not met this burden. *See Lopez-Sandoval,*146 F.3d at 715 (holding that, for § 2Dl.l(b)(l) to apply, defendant need not be carrying firearm when arrested-the inquiry is whether the gun was possessed during the course of criminal conduct for which the defendant was arrested).

Because the gun possession was considered as a specific offense characteristic in the drug offense, the district court did not err by grouping the offenses. *See*U.S.S.G. §§ 3D1.2(c); 3D1.2 comment, n. 5 (providing example of proper grouping where defendant is convicted of use of a firearm in a bank robbery and unlawful possession of that firearm).

AFFIRMED.1

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. We deny Wong’s motion for an order granting re-briefing or supplemental briefing.
### §180. Discharge of injunction upon certification of results of election or settlement; report to Congress

Upon the certification of the results of such ballot or upon a settlement being reached, whichever happens sooner, the Attorney General shall move the court to discharge the injunction, which motion shall then be granted and the injunction discharged. When such motion is granted, the President shall submit to the Congress a full and comprehensive report of the proceedings, including the findings of the board of inquiry and the ballot taken by the National Labor Relations Board, together with such recommendations as he may see fit to make for consideration and appropriate action.

(June 23, 1947, ch. 120, title II, §210, 61 Stat. 156.)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComputer programs to characterize alloys and predict cyclic life using the total strain version of strainrange partitioning: Tutorial and users manual, version 1.0This manual presents computer programs for characterizing and predicting fatigue and creep-fatigue resistance of metallic materials in the high-temperature, long-life regime for isothermal and nonisothermal fatigue. The programs use the total strain version of Strainrange Partitioning (TS-SRP). An extensive database has also been developed in a parallel effort. This database is probably the largest source of high-temperature, creep-fatigue test data available in the public domain and can be used with other life prediction methods as well. This users manual, software, and database are all in the public domain and are available through COSMIC (382 East Broad Street, Athens, GA 30602; (404) 542-3265, FAX (404) 542-4807). Two disks accompany this manual. The first disk contains the source code, executable files, and sample output from these programs. The second disk contains the creep-fatigue data in a format compatible with these programs.Document ID19930006599Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSaltsman, James F.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1992Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:4425E-6906NASA-TM-4425Accession Number93N15788Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 590-21-11Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930006599.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[110th Congress Public Law 248]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ248.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 2316]]

Public Law 110-248
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To amend title 40, United States Code, to authorize the use of Federal 
 supply schedules for the acquisition of law enforcement, security, and 
certain other related items by State and local governments. <<NOTE: June 
                       26, 2008 -  [H.R. 3179]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Local Preparedness 
Acquisition Act. 40 USC 101 note.>> assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Local Preparedness Acquisition Act''.
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR ACQUISITION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, 
                    SECURITY, AND CERTAIN OTHER RELATED ITEMS BY 
                    STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS THROUGH FEDERAL 
                    SUPPLY SCHEDULES.

    Paragraph (1) of section 502(c) of title 40, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``for automated'' and inserting the 
        following: ``for the following:
                    ``(A) Automated''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(B) Alarm and signal systems, facility management 
                systems, firefighting and rescue equipment, law 
                enforcement and security equipment, marine craft and 
                related equipment, special purpose clothing, and related 
                services (as contained in Federal supply classification 
                code group 84 or any amended or subsequent version of 
                that Federal supply classification group).''.

    Approved June 26, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3179:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110-494 (Comm. on Oversight and Government Reform).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 110-344 (Comm. on Homeland Security and Governmental 
Affairs).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 153 (2007):
                                    Dec. 17, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 154 (2008):
                                    June 10, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-98-30 May 5, 1998

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF RATES PRAIRIE ISLAND "SUPERIOR" IN MAINTENANCE AND

PLANT SUPPORT AND "GOOD" IN OPERATIONS AND ENGINEERING

The Prairie Island Nuclear Power Station, operated by

Northern States Power Company, has received performance ratings

of "superior" in maintenance and plant support and "good" in

operations and engineering in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission

staff’s latest Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance

(SALP) report for the facility. The plant is located in Red

Wing, Minnesota.

The assessment covers the period from February 18, 1996,

through March 28 of this year.

The NRC staff and Northern States Power officials will

discuss the evaluation at a meeting set for 9 a.m., Tuesday,

May 12, at the Prairie Island Training Center on the plant site.

The meeting will be open for public observation. NRC officials

will be available afterwards to speak with reporters, state and

local officials, and members of the public.

NRC SALP reports rate utilities in four functional areas --

plant operations, maintenance, engineering, and plant support --

and assign ratings of Category 1,2, or 3 depending on whether

their performance in those areas is superior, good or acceptable.

The report on Prairie Island gives the plant a "Category 1"

rating -- indicating superior performance -- in maintenance and

plant support and a "Category 2" rating -- indicating good

performance -- in operations and engineering.

In notifying the utility of the SALP findings, Regional

Administrator A. Bill Beach said they reflect "current overall

strong performance" at the Prairie Island plant.

Mr. Beach noted that the company’s performance in the plant

operations area declined from the previous superior rating, but

was good overall. "Procedural adherence errors and the quality

of operating procedures became a concern to the NRC midway

through the assessment period," he wrote. "Following the

issuance of several violations and the conduct of two NRC

management meetings with your staff, the NRC noted improvements
in this area."

On the other hand, Mr. Beach added, performance in the area

of engineering improved and was considered very good overall.

"Engineering staff provided strong support to operations,

maintenance, and other organizations, and continued to identify

and address technical issues," Mr. Beach continued. "Several

deficiencies were identified in operations, maintenance, and test

procedures due to insufficient engineering support."

Mr. Beach also said strong self-assessment efforts were

noteworthy in the areas of maintenance, engineering, and plant

support.

SALP Report Results:

Functional Area Current Period Previous Period

Operations 2 1

Maintenance 1 1

Engineering 2 2

Plant Support 1 1

####

Note: SALP reports are available for review on the NRC’s

internet web site at http://www.nrc.gov/OPA.
§ 123.63 Examination of baggage from Canada or Mexico. ( a ) *Opening vehicle or compartment to examine baggage.* Customs officers are authorized to unlock, open, and examine vehicles and compartments thereof for the purposes of examining baggage under sections 461, 462, 496, 581(a) and 582, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1461, 1462, 1496, 1581(a), and 1582) and 19 U.S.C. 482. However, to the extent practical, the Customs officer should ask the owner or operator to unlock such vehicle or compartment first. Where the owner or operator is unavailable or refuses to unlock the vehicle or compartment or where it is not practical to ask the owner or operator to unlock the same, it shall be opened by the Customs officer. If any article is subject to duty, or any prohibited article is found upon opening by the Customs officer, the whole contents and the vehicle shall be subject to forfeiture pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1462.
( b ) *Inspection of baggage.* A Customs officer has the right to inspect all merchandise and baggage brought into the United States from contiguous countries under 19 U.S.C. 1461. He also has the right, under the same statute, to require that owners of such baggage open it or furnish keys for doing so. Where the owner or agent is unavailable or refuses to open the baggage or furnish keys or where it is not practical to ask the owner or agent to open or furnish keys to the same, it shall be opened by the Customs officer. If any article is subject to duty, or any prohibited article is found upon opening by the Customs officer, the baggage shall be subject to forfeiture pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1462.
[T.D. 95-86, 60 FR 54188, Oct. 20, 1995]
### Part A—Capitol Guide Service
§ 6.70 Reporting requirement. ( a ) No later than 90 calendar days prior to the establishment of a new system of records, the prospective system manager shall notify the Privacy Appeals Officer of the proposed new system. The prospective system manager shall include with the notification a completed FEMA Form 11-2, System of Records Covered by the Privacy Act of 1974, and a justification for each system of records proposed to be established. If the Privacy Appeals Officer determines that the establishment of the proposed system is in the best interest of the Government, then no later than 60 calendar days prior to the establishment of that system of records, a report of the proposal shall be submitted by the Administrator or a designee thereof, to the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Administrator, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget for their evaluation of the probable or potential effect of that proposal on the privacy and other personal or property rights of individuals.
( b ) No later than 90 calendar days prior to the alteration of a system of records, the system manager responsible for the maintenance of that system of records shall notify the Privacy Appeals Officer of the proposed alteration. The system manager shall include with the notification a completed FEMA Form 11-2. System of Records Covered by the Privacy Act of 1974, and a justification for each system of records he proposes to alter. If it is determined that the proposed alteration is in the best interest of the Government, then, the Administrator, or a designee thereof, shall submit, no later than 60 calendar days prior to the establishment of that alteration, a report of the proposal to the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Administrator, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget for their evaluation of the probable or potential effect of that proposal on the privacy and other personal or property rights of individuals.
( c ) The reports required by this regulation are exempt from reports control.
( d ) The Administrator, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget may waive the time requirements set out in this section upon a finding that a delay in the establishing or amending the system would not be in the public interest and showing how the public interest would be adversely affected if the waiver were not granted and otherwise complying with OMB Circular A-130.
[44 FR 50293, Aug. 27, 1979, as amended at 45 FR 17152, Mar. 18, 1980; 51 FR 34604, Sept. 30, 1986]
### §4521. Mode of payment

The compensation of Members and Delegates shall be passed as public accounts, and paid out of the public Treasury.

(R.S. §46.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 47 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

R.S. §46 derived from acts Jan. 22, 1818, ch. 5, §3, 3 Stat. 404, and Feb. 10, 1854, ch. 11, §1, 10 Stat. 267.
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Michael B. Wheeler, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006 ofTufco Technologies, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 14, 2006   /s/Michael B. Wheeler Michael B. Wheeler  Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer  
21
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-80 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, April 20, 1999)

COMMISSION PUBLISHES FINAL RULE FOR EXPANDED UTILITY ROLE

IN TESTING REACTOR OPERATOR LICENSE CANDIDATES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has amended its regulations to provide an

expanded role for its nuclear power plant licensees in certifying reactor operators.

The Commission took this action in recognition of improvements in industry training

programs, to make the operator licensing program more efficient, and as a cost-cutting

measure for the agency.

Applicants for a license to manipulate the controls of a nuclear power plant must pass a

written test and demonstrate knowledge of control room operation fundamentals to be

considered for the final, hands-on, site-specific license examination.

Under its new rule, licensees operating nuclear power plants will be permitted to

prepare, proctor, and grade their exams and prepare their operating tests -- subject to NRC

approval. The NRC will continue to administer and grade the hands-on portion of the test,

including a control room simulator examination and a one-on-one demonstration of specific

operating tasks.

The rule change follows a 1995 decision by the Commission to begin a pilot program in

which nuclear power plant licensees would prepare the tests under NRC oversight.

All examinations and tests written by utilities and tailored to their specific plants will be

subject to review, modification, and approval by NRC staff before the tests are given. If the

submitted test fails to meet NRC’s standards, the agency has the option of preparing its own

exam in lieu of accepting or modifying one prepared by a utility.

To ensure that the NRC staff retains proficiency in examination writing and to serve as a

quality check on the process, the NRC staff will prepare the licensing examinations upon

request by facility licensees and at least once annually in each of the agency’s four regions.

Licensing of operators for research and test reactors will continue to be handled by the

NRC and will be unaffected by the rule change. Utilities also will continue to prepare and

administer requalification examinations to licensed operators as part of an NRC-approved

training program.

Full details of the final rule are included in a notice to be published shortly in the Federal

Register.

###
EXHIBIT 21.1

             SUBSIDIARIES OF BUILDING MATERIALS HOLDING CORPORATION

I.    Building Materials Holding Corporation

      A.    BMC Framing, Inc.

            1.    Knipp Brother Industries, LLC
            2.    KB Industries Limited Partnership (a)

      B.    BMC West Corporation

            1.    BMCW, LLC
            2.    BMC West Corporation SouthCentral
            3.    BMCW SouthCentral, LP (b)

(a)   Owned 99% and 1% by BMC Framing, Inc. and BMC West Corporation,
      respectively.
(b)   Owned 99% and 1% by BMCW, LLC and BMC West Corporation SouthCentral,
      respectively.