alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of RemoteMDx, Inc. on Form 10-KSB
for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David G. Derrick, Chief
Executive Officer, and Michael G. Acton, Chief Financial Officer, of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                               /s/ David G. Derrick
                                               -----------------------
                                               David G. Derrick
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               RemoteMDx, Inc.



                                               /s/ Michael G. Acton
                                               -----------------------
                                               Michael G. Acton
                                               Chief Financial Officer



Dated: December 19, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-81337-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

ANGELINE JEAN BAPTISTE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GASPETROL ENERGY 3 LLC, d/b/a SUNOCO

GAS STATION, a Florida Limited Liability Company

and SAUEL GONZALEZ, an individual,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Motion to Approve Settlement and

Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice, filed on September 17, 2020. [DE 11] (“Joint Motion”).

Having reviewed the relevant terms of the Settlement, the Court approves the Settlement 

Agreement as a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over FLSA provisions. See 

Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't. of Labor, 679 F.2d 1350, 1355 (11th Cir.1982).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Joint Motion [DE 11] is GRANTED;

2. The parties Settlement Agreement [DE 11-1] is hereby APPROVED;

3. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

4. The Court retains jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the settlement 

agreement. 

Case 9:20-cv-81337-WPD Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 1 of 2
5. The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case and DENY AS MOOT any pending 

motions.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 

24th day of September, 2020.

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record

Case 9:20-cv-81337-WPD Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2020 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

(Section 906 – Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002)

 

In connection with the report of Baytex Energy Ltd. (the “Company”) onthe Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof the “Report”), theundersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of our knowledge:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:                                  | July 14,  2004                                 |                |
|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|---------------------|
|                                   |                                                |
|                                   |                                                |
| /s/ Raymond T. Chan                    |                                                | /s/ Daniel G. Belot |   |
| Raymond T. Chan                        | Daniel G. Belot                                     |
| President and Chief Executive Officer, | Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
| Baytex Energy Ltd.                     | Baytex Energy Ltd.                                  |
|                                        |                                                     |                     |  |  |

 

----
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-98-34 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Thursday, April 30, 1998)

NRC RATES SURRY NUCLEAR PLANT "SUPERIOR" IN THREE AREAS,

"GOOD" IN ONE AREA OF LATEST ASSESSMENT REPORT

The Surry nuclear power plant received performance ratings of "superior" in three areas

and "good" in the one remaining area of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s latest

systematic assessment of licensee performance (SALP) of the facility.

The SALP report was sent April 27 to Virginia Power, which operates the facility near

Surry, Virginia. It evaluates the plant's performance from September 29, 1996 through

March 21 of this year.

NRC and Virginia Power officials will discuss the report during a meeting set for 1:00

p.m. Monday, May 11, at the Surry site. The meeting will be open for public

observation, and NRC officials will be available after the meeting to speak with

reporters, state and local officials, and members of the public.

The NRC SALP process rates licensees in four functional areas — plant operations,

maintenance, engineering, and plant support — and assigns ratings of Category 1, 2 or

3 depending on whether their performance in those areas was superior, good or

adequate.

The report on Surry gives the plant a Category 1 rating in plant operations,

maintenance and plant support indicating "superior" performance, and a Category 2

rating in engineering, indicating "good" performance. The ratings in the plant’s previous

SALP report, issued in November 1996, were Category 1's in plant operations,

engineering and plant support and Category 2 in maintenance.

In his cover letter to the report, NRC Regional Administrator Luis Reyes said “the plant

operated well” as “performance in the plant operations and plant support areas

remained superior.” He said performance in maintenance improved, most notably

during the latter portion of the assessment period. Reyes said the engineering area

declined because “some engineering support to maintenance resulted in inadequate

work and testing and some long-standing issues were not resolved completely by

engineering.”

###
EDITORS: A copy of the full SALP report is available from this office. SALP reports are also

available on the NRC's Internet web site (www.nrc.gov/OPA) and by e-mail

subscription. To receive SALP reports by e-mail as they are issued, send an e-mail

to listproc@nrc.gov with the following message: subscribe salp yourfirstname

yourlastname.
#### § 12.15 Disposition; refund of duty.

Plants or plant products which are prohibited admission into the United States under Federal law or regulations and are exported or destroyed under proper supervision are exempt from duty and any duties collected thereon shall be refunded. (See §§ 158.41 and 158.45(c) of this chapter.)

[28 FR 14710, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 72-258, 37 FR 20174, Sept. 27, 1972]
§ 113.65 Repayment of erroneous drawback payment bond conditions. A bond for repayment of erroneous drawback must contain the conditions listed in this section and may be either a single transaction or continuous bond. Repayment of Erroneous Drawback Payment Bond Conditions ( a ) *Agreement Under Exporter's Summary Procedure.* If the principal is permitted to file drawback claims under the exporter's summary procedure and the principal's drawback claims are paid before a final determination that the principal: ( 1 ) Is entitled to the drawback claimed.
( 2 ) Correctly described the exported articles in the claim.
( 3 ) Correctly stated the facts of exportation in the claim; the principal and surety, jointly and severally agree to refund, on demand, any money claimed by CBP to have been erroneously paid as a result of an incorrect statement on the drawback claim, and
( 4 ) The principal agrees to pay any charges due CBP as provided by law or regulation.
( b ) *Agreement Under Accelerated Payment of Drawback.* If the principal receives an accelerated payment of drawback based on the principal's calculation of the drawback claim, the principal and surety, jointly and severally agree to refund on demand the full amount of any overpayment, as determined on liquidation of the drawback claim.
[T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41171, Oct. 19, 1984, as amended by T.D. 86-178, 51 FR 34959, Oct. 1, 1986; T.D. 88-72, 53 FR 45902, Nov. 15, 1988; CBP Dec. 15-15, 80 FR 70168, Nov. 13, 2015]
#### § 12.30 Whaling.

The importation and exportation of whales or whale products taken or processed in violation of the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling signed at Washington under date of December 2, 1946 (Publication No. 3383, Department of State, Whaling Convention), or of the Whaling Convention Act of 1949 (16 U.S.C. 916 through 916(1)), or of any regulation issued under the Act (50 CFR part 351) is unlawful. Customs officers and employees shall perform all functions required of them by the above-mentioned convention, law and regulation.

[T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51253, Dec. 21, 1988]
#### § 143.41 Applicability.

This subpart sets forth the general requirements and procedures for Remote Location Filing (RLF). RLF entries are subject to the documentation, document retention and document retrieval requirements of this chapter as well as the general entry requirements of parts 141, 142 and 143 of this chapter. Participation in the RLF program is voluntary and at the option of the filer.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 801 

To identify and address barriers to coverage of remote physiologic devices 

under State Medicaid programs to improve maternal and child health 

outcomes for pregnant and postpartum women. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17 (legislative day, MARCH 16), 2021 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself, Ms. HASSAN, Mr. CARPER, Mr. YOUNG, and Ms. 

ROSEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To identify and address barriers to coverage of remote physiologic devices under State Medicaid programs to improve 

maternal and child health outcomes for pregnant and 

postpartum women. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Connected Maternal 

5 Online Monitoring Act’’ or the ‘‘Connected MOM Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 801 IS

1 SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF REMOTE PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING 

2 DEVICES AND IMPACT ON MATERNAL AND 

3 CHILD HEALTH OUTCOMES UNDER MED4 ICAID. 

5 (a) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 18 

6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Sec7 retary of Health and Human Services shall submit to Con8 gress a report containing information on authorities and 

9 State practices for covering remote physiological moni10 toring devices, including limitations and barriers to such 

11 coverage and the impact on maternal health outcomes, and 

12 to the extent appropriate, recommendations on how to ad13 dress such limitations or barriers related to coverage of 

14 remote physiologic devices under State Medicaid pro15 grams, including, but not limited to, pulse oximeters, blood 

16 pressure cuffs, scales, and blood glucose monitors, with 

17 the goal of improving maternal and child health outcomes 

18 for pregnant and postpartum women enrolled in State 

19 Medicaid programs. 

20 (b) STATE RESOURCES.—Not later than 6 months 

21 after the submission of the report required by subsection 

22 (a), the Secretary shall update resources for State Med23 icaid programs, such as State Medicaid telehealth toolkits, 

24 to be consistent with the recommendations provided in 

25 such report. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
### §1917. District courts; fee on filing notice of or petition for appeal

Upon the filing of any separate or joint notice of appeal or application for appeal or upon the receipt of any order allowing, or notice of the allowance of, an appeal or of a writ of certiorari $5 shall be paid to the clerk of the district court, by the appellant or petitioner.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 955.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §552 (Feb. 11, 1925, ch. 204, §5, 43 Stat. 857; Jan. 31, 1928, ch. 14, §1, 45 Stat. 54; Sept. 27, 1944, ch. 414, §3, 58 Stat. 744).

Words "to the clerk of the district court" were added to clarify the intent of Congress, as shown by the title of the 1944 act containing this section, and by the text of such Act in its entirety.

Words "as an additional fee in said suit or action, or proceeding in bankruptcy" were omitted. The entire text of the basic 1944 act shows that Congress intended it to apply to all actions, suits and proceedings, including bankruptcy proceedings, and nowhere else in such act is any reference made to bankruptcy proceedings.

Changes were made in phraseology.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

 Website: www.nrc.gov

No. IV-02-001 January 17, 2002

CONTACT: Breck Henderson 

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: Opa4@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO HOLD REGULATORY CONFERENCE 

WITH TXU ELECTRIC

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a regulatory conference with officials

of TXU Electric, operator of the Comanche Peak nuclear power plant near Glen Rose, Texas, on

Wednesday, January 23. 

The meeting, which is open to public observation, will begin at 1 p.m. in NRC Region IV

offices in Arlington, Texas. NRC officials in Arlington will be available after the meeting to answer

questions.

Conferees will discuss an inspection finding with a preliminary significance determination of

ìwhiteî involving the performance of checks for radioactivity on low-level waste items before they are

released from certain areas designated as ìradiologically controlled areas.î The items released were

clothing and maintenance equipment.

A ìwhiteî finding is defined as a regulatory problem with low to moderate safety significance. 

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear power plants with a color coded

significance determination process which classifies regulatory findings as being in one of four color

categories: green, white, yellow, or red in increasing order of safety significance.

Not performing proper checks for radioactivity before release of items from radiologically

controlled areas is an apparent violation of NRC requirements that is related to this preliminary

ìwhiteî finding. The apparent violation is being considered for enforcement action. No decision on

the apparent violation, any enforcement action, or the final significance determination of the inspection

finding will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made later by NRC officials.

###
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         954,386
<SECURITIES>                                    56,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,269,149
<ALLOWANCES>                                   287,514
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,247,048
<PP&E>                                      12,950,560
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,929,596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,821,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,641,702
<BONDS>                                      6,334,016
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,359
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,829,937
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,821,014
<SALES>                                     12,099,530
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,099,530
<CGS>                                        9,985,559
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,985,559
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (356,732)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             550,359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                191,479
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            191,479
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   191,479
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §2148. Administration of educational outreach and services

#### (a) Cooperative agreements

The Architect of the Capitol, subject to the direction of the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library, may enter into cooperative agreements with entities under such terms as the Architect determines advisable, in order to support the United States Botanic Garden in carrying out its duties, authorities, and mission.

#### (b) No-cost agreements

(1) The Architect of the Capitol may, subject to the direction of the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library, enter into a no-cost agreement, through a contract, cooperative agreement, or memorandum of understanding, with a qualified entity to conduct, or provide support for, an educational exhibit, program, class, or outreach that benefits the educational mission of the United States Botanic Garden.

(2) Any agreement under paragraph (1) may—

(A) allow the qualified entity to accept fees for any program or class described in paragraph (1) in order to cover all or a portion of the entity's costs of any supplies, honoraria, or associated expenses for the program or class; and

(B) subject to such terms as the Architect considers appropriate and necessary, grant temporary concessions to the qualified entity, or allow the qualified entity to grant temporary concessions to another person, in connection with an educational exhibit, program, class, or outreach described in paragraph (1), including concessions for food and merchandise sales that are specifically related to the educational mission involved.

(3) Section 5104(c) of title 40 shall not apply to any activity carried out under this subsection.

(4) In this subsection, the term "qualified entity" means—

(A) the National Fund for the United States Botanic Garden; and

(B) any other organization described in section 501(c) of title 26 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such title that the Architect of the Capitol determines shares interests complementary to the educational mission of the United States Botanic Garden.

#### (c) Construction or improvement of real property

Any authority under subsection (a) or (b) shall not apply to any agreement providing for the construction or improvement of real property.

#### (d) Applicability

This section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2015 and each succeeding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1102, Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2532.)
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Qualification (Experience) of Contractor Health Physics Technicians

## HPPOS-019 PDR-9111210125

See the letter from W. M. Morrison to B. E. Leonard (President, Institute for Resource Management, Inc.) dated August 26, 1980. For contractor health physics technicians, two-thousand or more working hours in a period of not less than 40 weeks is acceptable as representing one year of experience. HPPOS-021 and HPPOS-022 contain related topics.

The NRC staff recognizes that contractor health physics technicians are utilized at many of the power reactor facilities and that considerable overtime is frequently associated with this work. In consideration of this situation, members of the staff of NRR and IE developed guidance for the application of man-hours to years of experience for use only in determining the qualification of contractor health physics technicians. This guidance recommends that 2,000 or more working hours accumulated during a total period of not less than 40 weeks is acceptable as representing one year of experience.

The type of work performed by the individuals, however, is important in determining whether the hours worked meet the requirements for work experience. In addition, work experience is only one of several criteria for qualification. Experience, education, training, and demonstrated proficiency are also required for qualification (see HPPOS-021 and HPPOS-022).

**Regulatory references:** Regulatory Guide 1.8

**Subject codes:** 1.1

**Applicability:** Reactors

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Monday, October 02, 2017