alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of GlobalIndustries, Ltd. ("Global") on Form10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on May 10,2005 (the "Report"), theundersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 1350 asadopted pursuant to §§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledgebased upon a review of the Report, that:

        (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

        (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global as of thedates and for periods presented as required by such Report.

 

| /S/ TIMOTHY W. MICIOTTO |
|-------------------------|
| Timothy W. Miciotto     |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| May 10,  2005           |

 

 

        This certification is provided pursuant to §§ 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Global or the certifying officerfor purposes of §§ 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

        A signed original of this written statement required by§§ 906 has been provided to Global and will be retained by itand furnished to the SEC or its staff uponrequest.
§ 123.51 Commercial samples transported by automobile through Canada between ports in the United States. ( a ) *General provisions.* A commercial traveler arriving at a U.S. frontier port desiring to transport his commercial samples by automobile through Canada to another place in the United States without displaying the samples in Canada may request a U.S. Customs officer at the port of departure to cord and seal the outer containers of the samples if they can be effectively corded and sealed.
( b ) *List of samples.* The traveler shall furnish the U.S. Customs officer at the port of exit a list, in duplicate, of all the articles in the containers, with their approximate values, in substantially the following form: Samples Carried in Transit Through Canada in Private Vehicle (U.S. port of exit printed here) (Date) I have checked the quantity and values of the below-listed articles carried by ____________________(Name and address of traveler) and owned by ____________________(Name and address of firm or company) These articles are contained in ________ (Number) packages which have been corded and sealed for in-transit movement through Canada to ________ (U.S. port of reentry) in ________ (Year, make and license number of vehicle) (U.S. Customs Inspector) *Description of merchandise Value*
When the traveler arrives at Customs with lists already prepared, the form may be inscribed “as per list attached.”
( c ) *Checking, cording, and sealing by U.S. Customs officers.* The Customs officer shall check the list with the articles and satisfy himself that the values shown are approximately correct. The Customs officer will cord and seal the containers with yellow in-transit seals. The traveler may be required to assist the Customs officer in the cording and sealing. The original of the list, signed by the Customs officer over his title and showing that the articles on the list have been checked by the officer against those in the containers shall be returned to the traveler for submission by him to Canadian customs upon his arrival in Canada.
( d ) *In-transit manifest.* The traveler shall execute and file Customs Form 7512-B or 7533-C, in the original only, at the U.S. port of departure, as an in-transit manifest covering the movement of the samples to the U.S. port through which the traveler will return. Descriptions, quantities, and values may be shown thereon by noting “Commercial Samples” and the number of corded and sealed containers. The manifest shall be returned to the traveler to accompany the samples after being signed and dated by the Customs officer.
( e ) *Presentation of in-transit manifest at U.S. port of reentry.* Upon return to the United States, the traveler shall present Customs Form 7512-B or 7533-C and the corded and sealed samples to the U.S. Customs officer at the port where the samples are returned to this country. The Customs officer shall verify that there has been no irregularity.
[T.D. 70-121, 35 FR 8215, May 26, 1970, as amended by T.D. 82-145, 47 FR 35478, Aug. 16, 1982]
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132997 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices v SC: 132997 

 COA: 274952 

Hillsdale CC: 06-301069-FH 

AARON ROMAINE HEARN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 16, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0416 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 24, 2007 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 3

                             ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                          TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                            CENTRAL OIL CORPORATION

         The undersigned, Andreas Typaldos, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer, of CENTRAL OIL CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation, pursuant
to the provisiosn of the Colorado Business Corporation Act, adopts the following
Articles of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation as filed with the
Colorado Department of State on September 8, 1981:

         FIRST:   The name of the corporation is Central Oil Corporation.

         SECOND:  The following amendment to the Articles of Incorporation was
adopted on October 29, 1999, by a vote of the shareholders. The number of shares
voted for the amendment was sufficient for approval.

         THIRD:   The following provision of the Articles of Incorporation of
the Corporation is amended in the following particular:

                  ARTICLE I is deleted and replaced with the following:

                  ARTICLE I: The name of the Corporation is NetGain Development,
                             Inc.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of the corporation has executed these Articles of Amendment
this 3rd day of November, 1999.

                                         CENTRAL OIL CORPORATION, a
                                         Colorado corporation

                                         By: /s/ Andreas Typaldos
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Andreas Typaldos, Chairman of the
                                            Board and Chief Executive Officer
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0031 - Jefferson Proving Ground Decommissioning Status

Accession Number: ML030630587

Date Released: Friday, January 6, 2023

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML023430018 - SECY-03-0031 - Jefferson Proving Ground Facility Decommissioning Status (6 page(s), 3/3/2003)
    - ML030520478 - U.S. Army, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Request for Alternative Schedule for Submittal of Decommissioning Plan for Termination of Jefferson Proving Ground. (1 page(s), 2/4/2003)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Issue Date: 11/27/01 - 1 - 01-028

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL IIPB

Change Notice 01-028

DELETED: TRANSMITTED:

Number Date Number Date

1. MC 2401 02/28/97 MC 2401 11/27/01

2. IP 84100 05/29/92 IP 84100 11/27/01

TRAINING: No special training requirements have been identified for any documents

issued with this change notice.

REMARKS: MC 2401 (Near-Surface Low-Level Radioactive Waste Facility Inspection

Program) has been reviewed and is issued without changes at the present

time. A note was inserted at the beginning of the document to verify the

document has been reviewed and will not be revised until NRC program

changes warrant revision.

IP 84100 (Special Nuclear Material Inspections at Near Surface Low-Level

Waste Disposal Facilities in Agreement States) has been reviewed and is

issued without changes at the present time. A note was inserted at the

beginning of the document to verify the document has been reviewed and

will not be revised until NRC program changes warrant revision.

DISTRIBUTION: Standard

END
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1432 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1432

  To authorize the Secretary of State to enter into negotiations with 
  representatives of the Government of Cuba to establish cooperation 
    between the United States and Cuba on illicit narcotics control 
                                efforts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2003

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the Secretary of State to enter into negotiations with 
  representatives of the Government of Cuba to establish cooperation 
    between the United States and Cuba on illicit narcotics control 
                                efforts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE GOVERNMENT OF CUBA TO ESTABLISH 
              COOPERATION ON ILLICIT NARCOTICS CONTROL EFFORTS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of State 
(or the Secretary's designee) is authorized to enter into negotiations 
with representatives of the Government of Cuba to establish cooperation 
between appropriate governmental agencies of the United States and Cuba 
on illicit narcotics control efforts, including efforts to provide 
increased cooperation, coordination, and assistance between the two 
countries to interdict illicit narcotics that are transported through 
the territory of Cuba (including Cuban airspace and waters).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,253
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,747
<ALLOWANCES>                                       558
<INVENTORY>                                     25,605
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,360
<PP&E>                                         101,679
<DEPRECIATION>                                (52,182)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,127
<BONDS>                                        168,145
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     14,823
<COMMON>                                        34,288
<OTHER-SE>                                   (103,032)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,351
<SALES>                                        158,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               158,418
<CGS>                                          106,359
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  154,175
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,098
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (92)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,354
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,467)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,467)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,467)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (7.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (7.28)


</TABLE>
§ 191.143 Drawback entry. ( a ) *Filing of entry.* Drawback entries covering these foreign-built jet aircraft engines shall be filed on Customs Form 7551, modified to show that the entry covers jet aircraft engines processed under § 313(h) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(h)).
( b ) *Contents of entry.* The entry shall show the country in which each engine was manufactured and describe the processing performed thereon in the United States.
### §658a. Exclusions

This part shall not apply to any provision in a bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report before Congress that—

(1) enforces constitutional rights of individuals;

(2) establishes or enforces any statutory rights that prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, handicap, or disability;

(3) requires compliance with accounting and auditing procedures with respect to grants or other money or property provided by the Federal Government;

(4) provides for emergency assistance or relief at the request of any State, local, or tribal government or any official of a State, local, or tribal government;

(5) is necessary for the national security or the ratification or implementation of international treaty obligations;

(6) the President designates as emergency legislation and that the Congress so designates in statute; or

(7) relates to the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance program under title II of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 401 et seq.] (including taxes imposed by sections 3101(a) and 3111(a) of title 26 (relating to old-age, survivors, and disability insurance)).

(Pub. L. 93–344, title IV, §422, as added Pub. L. 104–4, title I, §101(a)(2), Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 53.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Social Security Act, referred to in par. (7), is act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, 49 Stat. 620. Title II of the Act is classified generally to subchapter II (§401 et seq.) of chapter 7 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1305 of Title 42 and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1996, or on the date 90 days after appropriations are made available as authorized under section 1516 of this title, whichever is earlier, and applicable to legislation considered on and after such date, see section 110 of Pub. L. 104–4, set out as a note under section 1511 of this title.
NO. 07-03-0361-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TE XAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL B JANUARY 22, 2004

______________________________ KENNETH GEAL AVERY, Appellant
v. THE STA

TE OF TEX

AS, Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE 252 ND DISTRICT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY ;

NO. 87,126; HON. LARRY GIST, PRESIDING

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ. Appellant

Kenneth Geal Ave ryappeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. His court-appointed counsel has moved to withdraw after filing a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (196 7), and representing he has searched the record and found no arguable grounds for reversal. The motion and brief indica te that ap pellant was info rmed of hi s rights to review the appe llate record and file his own brief. So too di d we inform appellant that any pro se response or brief he cared to file had to be filed by December 10, 200 3. Upon therequest f or more time, the deadline was extended to Janu ary 14, 2004. To date, appellant has filed no pro se response

or brief. Nor hashe moved for anoth er exten sion.2

In compliance with the principles enunciated in Anders , appellate counsel discussed
one potentia l area fo r

appeal which concerned an objection regardin g the prosecutor testifying for the S tate’s wi tness. Ho wever, appellate counsel points out that trial counsel did notrequest a n instruc tion nor a mistrial; thus, the issue was not preserved for review. Furthermore, appella te counsel discusses each phaseof the tri al, i.e. indictment, pretrial motion s, the sti pulation of evidence and sentencing, and thereafter concl uded that no issues were presented for appeal. So too have we conducted an independent review of the record to d etermin e whether there existed reversible error and found no ne. See Staff ord v. Sta te , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (requiring us to conduct an independent review). Appellant
was stopped while riding his bicycle for failing to obey the trafficlaws. During the attempt to stop appellant, the arresting officers observed appellant thr ow a me tallic object to the ground. After ret rieving the objec t, which was a pi ll bottl e, th e offi cers found “crack” cocaine inside. At trial, appellant stipulated to the chain-of-custody an d that t he bottle contained over

one gram of cocai ne but le ss than fo ur grams. There were no objections to the jury charge, and we have found no egregiou s h arm caused by anything in the charge. Furthermore, the punishment assessed, seve n years i n prison, was within that prescribe d by law . T EX
. P EN
. C ODE A NN . §12.42( a)(3) (Ver non 2003 ). Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Brian Quinn Justice Do not publish.
POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Bradley J. Wilhite and Theodore Aroney, and each
of them, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in
any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective
amendments) to this Report on Form 10-KSB, and to file the same, with all
exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith,
as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of
them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Date:    April 12, 2000              By:        /S/ THEODORE ARONEY
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Theodore Aroney, Director

Date:    April 12, 2000              By:        /S/ MARK BERGENDAHL
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Mark Bergendahl, Director

Date:                                By:
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Henry J. Fleming, Jr., Director


Date:    April 12, 2000              By:        /S/ BRADLEY J. WILHITE
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Bradley J. Wilhite
                                           President, Acting Chief Executive
                                           Officer, Director

Date:    April 12, 2000              By:        /S/ SAL LUPO
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Sal Lupo, Director
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 99-25 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson June 16, 1999

OFFICE: 817-860-8128

PAGER: 888-876-2331

E-Mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING TO DESCRIBE

NEW NRC INSPECTION PROGRAM FOR COOPER NUCLEAR STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with the public June 22 to describe a

new pilot inspection and assessment program being conducted at Cooper Nuclear Station, a

nuclear power plant near Brownville, Nebraska.

The meeting will be at 7 p.m. at Arbor Manor, 1617 Central Ave., Auburn, Nebraska.

The meeting will include a description of the new program and an opportunity for questions and

comments from the public.

Cooper is one of nine plants participating in the pilot program, which began June 1, to

test and adjust the new inspection and assessment process. Following the six-month trial, the

program is expected to be extended to all 103 commercial nuclear power reactors next year.

The NRC has developed the new reactor inspection and assessment program to more

effectively and efficiently use its resources. Changes in the inspection and assessment effort

are necessary to keep pace with improvements in nuclear power plant safety performance over

the past 20 years. Plants that perform well will have less regulatory oversight than plants that

have problems.

A "baseline" inspection program will continue for all nuclear plants with NRC resident

inspectors on site supplemented by specialists from one of four NRC regional offices. If

performance declines at a plant, the NRC will step up its regulatory activities for that plant.

The new assessment program will focus in part on performance indicators. These

indicators are objective, statistically-based parameters that indicate how safely plants are

performing. In addition, NRC inspectors will monitor a number of plant activities that are not

measured by the indicators. The inspections will pay particular attention to how well the plant

staff finds and fixes problems that affect safety.

The pilot inspection and assessment program began June 1 at nine power plant sites --

Hope Creek and Salem in New Jersey, FitzPatrick in New York, Prairie Island in Minnesota,

Quad Cities in Illinois, Shearon Harris in North Carolina, Sequoyah in Tennessee, and Fort

Calhoun and Cooper in Nebraska.

A more complete description of the new inspection and oversight program is available

on the NRC's internet web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm. Questions may also be

addressed to opa@nrc.gov.
###