alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 201.29 Commission disclosure of individual records, accounting of record disclosures, and requests for accounting of record disclosures. ( a ) It is the policy of the Commission not to disclose, except as permitted under 5 U.S.C. 552a(b), any record which is contained in any system of records maintained by the Commission to any person, or to another agency, except pursuant to a written request by, or with the prior written consent of, the individual to whom the record pertains.
( b ) Except for disclosures either to officers and employees of the Commission, or to contractor employees who, in the Inspector General's or the Privacy Act Officer's judgment, as appropriate, are acting as federal employees, who have a need for the record in the performance of their duties, and any disclosure required by 5 U.S.C. 552, the Privacy Act Officer shall keep an accurate accounting of: ( 1 ) The date, nature, and purpose of each disclosure of a record to any person or to another agency under paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 2 ) The name or address of the person or agency to whom the disclosure is made.
( c ) The Privacy Act Officer shall retain the accounting required by paragraph (b) of this section for at least five years or the life of the record, whichever is longer, after such disclosure.
( d ) Except for disclosures made to other agencies for civil or criminal law enforcement purposes pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(7), the Privacy Act Officer shall make any accounting made under paragraph (b) of this section available to the individual named in the record at the individual's request.
( e ) An individual requesting an accounting of disclosure of his or her records should make the request in writing to the Privacy Act Officer, United States International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. The request should identify each particular record in question and, whenever possible, the system[s] of records wherein the requested records are located, and clearly indicate both on the envelope and in the letter that it is a Privacy Act request for an accounting of disclosure of records.
( f ) Where the Commission has provided any person or other agency with an individual record and such accounting as required by paragraph (b) of this section has been made, the Privacy Act Officer shall inform all such persons or other agencies of any correction, amendment, or notation of dispute concerning said record.
#### Avery v. Davenport.

Oct. 9, 1945.

*866Rodes K. Myers for appellant.

Rodes, Harlin & Willock for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Dawson

Affirming.

.This is an appeal from a judgment which dismissed an appeal from the County Court because the traverse of the finding in a forcible detainer proceeding had not been filed within the time specified by Section 463 of the Civil Code of Practice.

On the thirteenth of June, 1945, the appellee made complaint before the County Judge of Warren County that the appellant forcibly detained from her the premises at 334 Main Street, Bowling Green, and the County Judge thereupon issued the usual writ. Following a hearing, the Court, on July 10, 1945, found the appellant to be unlawfully in possession of the premises and entered a judgment to that effect. On July 13, 1945, the traverse provided for by Section 463 of the Civil Code of Practice, was filed and the record was thereafter filed in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court. Appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because of the delay in filing the traverse, and on July 21, 1945, the Circuit Court entered an order dismissing the case, from which order this appeal was granted.

Section 463 of the Civil Code of Practice requires that the traverse of the finding of the original trial court must be filed within three days next after the finding. The filing of the traverse within three days was necessary to give the Circuit Court jurisdiction. See Berry et al. v. Trice, 179 Ky. 594, 201 S. W. 37; Hoskins v. Morgan, 249 Ky. 576, 61 S. W. 2d 30.

It is too well settled to admit of dispute that the day of the rendition of the judgment must be counted as the first of the three days within which the traverse must be filled. Black v. National Bank of Kentucky, 226 Ky. 152, 10 S. W. 2d 629, and cases cited therein.

While it- is contended that the three days provided for in Section 463 of the Civil Code mean three judicial *867days (Black v. National Bank of Kentucky, supra), the judgment in this case was entered on July 10th, which fell on Tuesday, and there were no intervening legal holidays between that date and Thursday, July 12th, which was the last day the traverse could have been filed. The traverse, being filed on July 13th, was filed too late.

Appellant presents two other contentions: First, he claims that the judgment was not actually signed or of record on July 10th. However, the record shows that the judgment was entered on July 10th, is dated the same day, and we are bound by the record. Second, it is claimed that his attorney did not receive a copy of the judgment and had no knowledge that it was entered until July 13th. This is not the unavoidable casualty and misfortune referred to in Section 518 of the Civil Code of Practice, and this plea has no merit. See Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. McMurry, 278 Ky. 238, 128 S. W. 2d 596; and Carter et al. v. Miller, 264 Ky. 532, 95 S. W. 2d 29.

The judgment of the Circuit Court in dismissing the appeal for lack of jurisdiction was correct and it is therefore affirmed.
§ 148.46 Sale of exempted articles. ( a ) *Sale resulting in forfeiture.* The following articles or their value (to be recovered from the importer) upon their sale, shall be subject to forfeiture in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 98, Subchapter IV, U.S. Note 1, HTSUS (19 U.S.C. 1202), unless the procedure set forth in paragraph (b) of this section is followed: ( 1 ) Any jewelry or similar articles of personal adornment having an aggregate value of $300 or more which have been allowed an exemption under § 148.42, if sold within 3 years of the date of importation.
( 2 ) Any conveyance or its equipment allowed an exemption under § 148.45, if sold within 1 year after the date of importation.
( b ) *Procedure permitting sale.* Articles described in paragraph (a) of this section may be sold if, prior to the time of sale, payment is made to a port director of the duty which would have been payable at the time of entry if the article had been entered without the benefit of the applicable exemption.
( c ) *Permissible sales.* A sale pursuant to a judicial order or in liquidation of the estate of a decedent is not a basis for any liability for duty or forfeiture.
[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51265, Dec. 21, 1988]
§ 146.31 Admissibility of merchandise into a zone. Merchandise of every description may be admitted into a zone unless prohibited by law. A distinction is made between prohibited and conditionally admissible merchandise. ( a ) *Prohibited merchandise.* Port directors shall not admit prohibited merchandise. If there is a question as to whether the merchandise may be prohibited, port directors may permit the temporary deposit of the merchandise in a zone pending a final determination of its status. Any prohibited merchandise which is found within a zone will be disposed of in the manner provided for in the laws and regulations applicable to that merchandise.
( b ) *Conditionally admissible merchandise.* The admission of this merchandise into a zone is subject to the regulations of the Federal agency concerned.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-55 July 25, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING NEAR OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT

ON CHANGES IN REACTOR OVERSIGHT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a public meeting for Monday, July 31, in

Lacey Township, N.J., to discuss the agency’s new reactor oversight process. Lacey is home to one of

the nation’s 103 operating commercial nuclear power plants, the Oyster Creek facility.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. in the courtroom at the Lacey Township Municipal Building,

818 W. Lacey Road. Members of the public will have the opportunity to ask questions of NRC staff

during and after the meeting.

The new oversight process, which began at Oyster Creek in April, uses more objective, timely

and safety-significant criteria in assessing performance while seeking to more effectively and

efficiently regulate the industry. Under the new process, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and

regional office-based personnel are supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called

performance indicators. These performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant

operations, including the viability of redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation

protection and security measures.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC’s web site every three months. The safety significance of each inspection finding or performance

indicator is characterized by a color -- green, white, yellow or red.

The NRC response to the inspection finding and performance indicators will be based on the

significance of the items. A green finding receives normal NRC oversight, while white, yellow or red

assessments receive increasing NRC involvement. Multiple red findings could result in a plant

shutdown.

A plain language summary of the reactor oversight process is available from the NRC Office of

Public Affairs or on the web site at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm . Detailed information regarding

the reactor oversight process is available on the web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html .
#
### §68–6. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 68–6 was editorially reclassified as section 6508 of this title.
### **CHAPTER 23—GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES**

Sec.
1001.
Definitions.
1002.
Lands subject to geothermal leasing.
1002a.
Repealed.
1003.
Leasing procedures.
1004.
Rents and royalties.
1005.
Lease term and work commitment requirements.
1006.
Acreage limitations.
1007.
Readjustment of lease terms and conditions.
1008.
Byproducts.
1009.
Relinquishment of geothermal rights.
1010.
Suspension of operations and production.
1011.
Termination of leases.
1012.
Waiver, suspension, or reduction of rental or royalty.
1013.
Surface land use.
1014.
Lands subject to geothermal leasing.
1015.
Requirement for lessees.
1016.
Administration.
1017.
Unit and communitization agreements.
1018.
Data from Federal agencies.
1019.
Disposal of moneys from sales, bonuses, rentals, and royalties.
1020.
Publication in Federal Register; reservation of mineral rights.
1021.
Federal exemption from State water laws.
1022.
Prevention of waste; exclusivity.
1023.
Rules and regulations.
1024.
Inclusion of geothermal leasing under certain other laws.
1025.
Federal reservation of certain mineral rights.
1026.
Significant thermal features.
1027.
Land subject to prohibition on leasing.
1028.
Hot dry rock geothermal energy.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-102 December 10, 1999

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will meet with representatives of Northeast

Nuclear Energy Company (NNECO) on Wednesday, December 15, to discuss the company’s

assessment of recent performance at Millstone Units 2 and 3. The plants are located in

Waterford, Conn.

The meeting, which is open to the public for observation, will be held at 1:00 p.m., in the

Leland F. Sillin Nuclear Training Center at the Millstone site.

#
#### Emma Berry, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Urban Water Supply Company and Beaver Engineering and Contracting Company, Appellants.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present—Burr, Thomas, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ.
### §1. Time for election of Senators

At the regular election held in any State next preceding the expiration of the term for which any Senator was elected to represent such State in Congress, at which election a Representative to Congress is regularly by law to be chosen, a United States Senator from said State shall be elected by the people thereof for the term commencing on the 3d day of January next thereafter.

(June 4, 1914, ch. 103, §1, 38 Stat. 384; June 5, 1934, ch. 390, §3, 48 Stat. 879.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1934—Act June 5, 1934, substituted "3d day of January" for "fourth day of March".

#### Constitutional Provisions

The first section of Amendment XX to the Constitution provides in part: "* * * the terms of Senators and Representatives [shall end] at noon on the 3d day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin."

Time for election of Senators, see Const. Art. I, §4, cl. 1.

Vacancies in the Senate, see Const. Amend. XVII.
#### Stephen Korzeniewski, Appellant, v. Welch Grape Juice Co., Inc., et al., Respondents.

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. All concur. (The judgment is for defendants for no cause of action in an automobile negligence action. The order denies plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Harris, MeCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.
Errata Sheet

U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1206

Subsequent to publication of U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1206, “Water Quality in the Santee River Basin and Coastal Drainages, 

North and South Carolina, 1995–98,” errors were found on pages 15 and 20. 

On page 15, the unit of measurement used in fi gure 15 to express the median concentration of trace elements in bed sediment and tissue 

should have been micrograms per gram, rather than micrograms per kilogram. A correct fi gure 15 is below.

On page 20, the label on the left side of the top graph of fi gure 18 for the unit of measurement used to express the median concentration 

of atrazine erroneously included ammonia. The label for the unit of measurement used to express the median concentration of ammonia 

should have been on the right side of the top graph. A correct fi gure 18 is below.

We apologize for any inconvenience these errors may have caused.

Figure 15. Cadmium, copper, selenium, and zinc were 

detected at higher concentrations in clam and fi sh 

tissue than in sediment, suggesting that they accumulate in the tissues. Conversely, arsenic, chromium, lead, 

and nickel were detected in lower concentrations in 

tissues than in sediment, indicating that these metals 

do not accumulate in the tissues.

Selenium

Zinc

CLAM TISSUE

FISH LIVER

BED SEDIMENT

MEDIAN CONCENTRATION OF TRACE ELEMENTS IN BED SEDIMENT AND TISSUE, IN

 MICROGRAMS PER GRAM

0

50

100

150

200

0

2

4

6

8

10

Copper

Cadmium

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0

1

2

3

4

5

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

CLAM TISSUE

FISH LIVER

BED SEDIMENT

Arsenic

Chromium

Lead

Nickel

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Forested Agricultural Urban Mixed

Forested Agricultural Urban Mixed

ATRAZINE

AMMONIA

EPT TAXA

CONTAMINANT-INTOLERANT 

FISH SPECIES

MEDIAN CONCENTRATION OF ATRAZINE, IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER

NUMBER OF EPHEMEROPTERA, PLECOPTERA, AND TRICHOPTERA TAXA AND PERCENTAGEOF CONTAMINANT-INTOLERANT FISH SPECIES

MEDIAN CONCENTRATION OF AMMONIA, 

 

10

IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER

20

30

40

50

Printed on recycled paper

Figure 18. Compared to forested sites, urban and agricultural 

sites have higher concentrations of atrazine and ammonia 

as well as lower numbers of fi sh and invertebrates that are 

intolerant of contamination.
§ 165.24 Interim measures. ( a ) *Reasonable suspicion.* No later than 90 calendar days after initiating an investigation under § 165.15, CBP will take interim measures if there is a reasonable suspicion that the importer entered covered merchandise into the customs territory of the United States through evasion.
( b ) *Measures.* If CBP decides that there is reasonable suspicion under paragraph (a) of this section, then: ( 1 ) For entries that remain unliquidated, CBP will: ( i ) Suspend the liquidation of each unliquidated entry of such covered merchandise that entered on or after the date of the initiation of the investigation under § 165.15;
( ii ) Extend the period for liquidating each unliquidated entry of such covered merchandise that entered before the date of the initiation of the investigation under § 165.15 pursuant to section 504(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1504(b)); and
( iii ) Take such additional measures as CBP determines necessary to protect the revenue of the United States, including requiring a single transaction bond or additional security or the posting of a cash deposit with respect to such covered merchandise pursuant to section 623, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1623).
( 2 ) For entries that are liquidated, CBP may initiate or continue any appropriate measures separate from this proceeding.
( c ) *Notice.* If CBP decides that there is reasonable suspicion under paragraph (a) of this section, CBP will issue a notice of this decision to the parties to the investigation within five business days after taking interim measures. CBP will also provide parties to the investigation with a public version of the administrative record within 10 business days of the issuance of a notice of initiation of an investigation.
[81 FR 56482, Aug. 22, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 19260, Mar. 18, 2024]
**B F**  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 3
- 0 02 6 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. THOMAS WOJTOWICZ ,

Defendant and Appellant.**ORDER** Upon consideration Appellee ’s motion for a 3 0
- day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including January 2 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve its response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 21 2023

11/21/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0026
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-182 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

(Thursday, December 11,

1997)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a

meeting on January 20 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will

begin at 8:30 a.m. in Room T-2B3, of the NRC's Two White Flint

North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike. The Subcommittee on

Human Factors will review the latest version of the Human

Performance and Reliability Implementation Plan, status of a

technique for human error analysis pilot program, integration of

human factors considerations into the inspection process, results

of studies that used the Human Performance Events Database, and

associated activities.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for

public comment, will be described in a Notice of Meeting

published in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

#
###### Editorial Note on Part 159

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93023, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 159.0 Scope.

This part sets forth general rules for the liquidation of entries. Certain specific procedures affecting liquidation appear in other parts of this chapter; e.g., part 158 of this chapter covers allowance for lost or damaged merchandise.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D . C . , 20460 OFFICE OF C HEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION 

### P

C Co de 128887 

### DP Barcode 407973 

### Date February 7 , 20 1 3 

### MEMORANDUM SUB.JECT:

F

RO M :
REV I E W E R S:
THRO UGH:
TO: Review of DuP on t 's Re spo n se to Agency Memorandum D ated Sep. 26, 2012; DP Barcode: 404864; Review of Two Reports (MRI D s 48904003 

### & 48904004) and Request for Resubmis s ion of Report s Jame s Lin, Environmental Engin ee rL ............_ J \ ' Environmental Risk Branch 2



## ~ **~** E n vi ronmental Fate and Effect s Di vis io n (7507 P ) Greg Orrick , Environmental Scient is t



# ~ 0



# ~ E nviro nmental Risk Branch 2 Envi ronmental Fate and Effects Di vis ion (7507P) Brian Ande rson, Chief 

# ff) r / 

# ;ft_

______ _ Environmental Risk Branch 2 Environmental Fa t e and Effe cts Divi s ion (7507P) Ka itlin Ke ll er, Risk Manager R eview Ri sk Manage ment and Im plementat io n Branch 3 P est ic id e Re- eval uation Di v is i on (7508 P)
T hi s me mo acknowledges the subm itted response s from the r eg is trant , E.I. duPont de Nemours Company , r ega rdin g EFE D ' s review (DP Barcod e: 404864) of report s ( MRIDs 48904003 and 48904004) in respo n se to a Data Call- In (DCI) for an Environmental Chemistry Me thod (ECM) report and an Ind ependent Laboratory Validation (I L V) report to fu lfill guideli ne 835.6100 (terre stria l field dissipation) for tribenuron-meth y l. In this s ubmi ssion, the regi st rant has resubmitted th e reports under th e same MRIDs with th e 

### o nl y changes of removing the data confidentiality markings 

### (e.g., "Trade Secret") and statements that limit th e i r re lease to the public and to foreign parties. These re v is ions address part of the OCI. The registran t al so comm its to provide a required ECM and I L V to completely satisfy the DCI by th e May 20 13 deadline. The pending ECM and ILV re port s may s ati sfy the D CI ifthey are classified accep tab l e up on review . 

# 11181111111111111 2088532



### ·---- 

## -------
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-86 December 13, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES LOIS M. JAMES RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT INDIAN POINT 3 NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have appointed Lois M.

James the agency’s resident inspector at the Indian Point 3 nuclear plant in Buchanan, New York. Ms.

James joins NRC Senior Resident Inspector Peter Drysdale.

Ms. James joined the NRC’s Region I office as a reactor engineer in 1997. From 1997 through

this year she was a region-based inspector conducting engineering, maintenance, and operations

inspections at various Region I nuclear plants. Before joining the agency, Ms. James worked as an

environmental engineer at the Department of Energy in Germantown, Md., and as a staff engineer for

Bechtel Power Corporation in Gaithersburg, Md. She received a Master of Environmental Engineering

from Johns Hopkins University and a Bachelor of Nuclear Engineering from the Georgia Institute of

Technology.

Ms. James and the senior resident inspector at Indian Point 3 can be reached at 914-739-8565.

#