alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.3029 Repeated false or unsupported preference claims.

Where verification or other information reveals a pattern of conduct by an importer, exporter, or producer of false or unsupported representations that goods qualify under the CTPA rules of origin set forth in General Note 34, HTSUS, CBP may suspend preferential tariff treatment under the CTPA to entries of identical goods covered by subsequent representations by that importer, exporter, or producer until CBP determines that representations of that person are in conformity with General Note 34, HTSUS.
Doc ID: a9158f7dff9c8b1d24f3a501b0603e97c79f9d95

Case 4:20-cv-10090-JLK Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/10/2020 Page 1 of 11
Doc ID: a9158f7dff9c8b1d24f3a501b0603e97c79f9d95

Case 4:20-cv-10090-JLK Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/10/2020 Page 2 of 11
Doc ID: a9158f7dff9c8b1d24f3a501b0603e97c79f9d95

Case 4:20-cv-10090-JLK Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/10/2020 Page 3 of 11
Doc ID: a9158f7dff9c8b1d24f3a501b0603e97c79f9d95

Case 4:20-cv-10090-JLK Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/10/2020 Page 4 of 11
Doc ID: a9158f7dff9c8b1d24f3a501b0603e97c79f9d95

Case 4:20-cv-10090-JLK Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/10/2020 Page 5 of 11
Doc ID: a9158f7dff9c8b1d24f3a501b0603e97c79f9d95

Case 4:20-cv-10090-JLK Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/10/2020 Page 6 of 11
Doc ID: a9158f7dff9c8b1d24f3a501b0603e97c79f9d95

Case 4:20-cv-10090-JLK Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/10/2020 Page 7 of 11
Doc ID: a9158f7dff9c8b1d24f3a501b0603e97c79f9d95

Case 4:20-cv-10090-JLK Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/10/2020 Page 8 of 11
11 / 09 / 2020

Doc ID: a9158f7dff9c8b1d24f3a501b0603e97c79f9d95

Case 4:20-cv-10090-JLK Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/10/2020 Page 9 of 11
Doc ID: a9158f7dff9c8b1d24f3a501b0603e97c79f9d95

Case 4:20-cv-10090-JLK Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/10/2020 Page 10 of 11
Audit Trail

Title


File Name


Document ID


Audit Trail Date Format


Status

Settlement Agreement

VIVERO MILVIA - S...y DEF) 102920.pdf

a9158f7dff9c8b1d24f3a501b0603e97c79f9d95

MM / DD / YYYY

Completed

10 / 30 / 2020

11:57:19 UTC-5

Sent for signature to Milvia Vivero

(milviavivero62@gmail.com) from jfp@thepalmalawgroup.com

IP: 73.0.216.26

10 / 30 / 2020

13:34:10 UTC-5

Viewed by Milvia Vivero (milviavivero62@gmail.com)

IP: 172.58.14.199

11 / 09 / 2020

15:55:06 UTC-5

Signed by Milvia Vivero (milviavivero62@gmail.com)

IP: 172.58.14.254

11 / 09 / 2020 The document has been completed.

15:55:06 UTC-5

Case 4:20-cv-10090-JLK Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/10/2020 Page 11 of 11
#### § 103.25 Procedure in the event of an adverse ruling.

If the court or other authority declines to stay the demand in response to a request made in accordance with § 103.24 pending receipt of instructions, or rules that the demand must be complied with irrespective of instructions rendered in accordance with §§ 103.22, 103.23, 103.26, or 103.27 of this subpart not to produce the documents or disclose the information sought, the CBP employee upon whom the demand has been made shall, pursuant to this subpart, respectfully decline to comply with the demand. *See, United States ex rel. Touhy* v. *Ragen,* 340 U.S. 462 (1951).

[61 FR 19838, May 3, 1996, as amended at 78 FR 70856, Nov. 27, 2013]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter World Currency Fund L.P. and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      29,379,174
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  143,010<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,440,606<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,440,606<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,981,411<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,035,884
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                945,527
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            945,527
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   945,527
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $93,404 and due from DWR of
$49,606.
<F2)In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $664,184 and net option premiums of
$254,238.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $254,435, accrued management
fees of $76,008, and accrued administrative expenses of $37,241.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $1,500,178, net
change in unrealized of $(111,345) and interest income of $592,578.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBIT 2

                       [Letterhead of The Otto Law Group]

                                 January 9, 2003

  Dtomi,  Inc.
  200  Ninth  Avenue  North
  Suite  220,  Safety  Harbor,  Florida,  34965

         Re:  Registration  of Common Stock of Dtomi, Inc., a Nevada corporation
              ("Dtomi")

  Ladies  and  Gentlemen:

           In  connection with the registration statement on Form SB-2 under the
Securities  Act of 1933, as amended in Amendment No. 2, (i) 10,994,460 shares of
common  stock to be issued in private offerings, (ii) 1,831,798 shares of common
stock  to  be issued in private offering, (iii) the issuance of 5,000,000 shares
of  common  stock,  1,700,000 shares of common stock to be issued as part of the
Network 60, LLC ("Network 60") share exchange agreement, and (iv) 100,000 shares
of  common stock to be issued to three (3) individuals for services rendered, we
have  examined such documents and have reviewed such questions of law as we have
considered necessary and appropriate for the purposes of this opinion and, based
thereon,  we  advise you that, in our opinion, when such shares have been issued
and  sold  pursuant  to  the  applicable provisions of the private offering, the
share  exchange  agreement  by  and between Network 60 and Dtomi, and employment
agreement, in accordance with the registration statement referenced herein, such
shares  will  be  validly  issued,  fully  paid and assessable shares of Dtomi's
common  stock.

           We  hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
above  described  registration  statement.

     Very  truly  yours,

     THE  OTTO  LAW  GROUP,  PLLC
     ----------------------------
     /s/  The  Otto  Law  Group,  PLLC

<PAGE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No.: 20-mc-22954-UU

THOMAS W. WALDREP, JR.,

Chapter 11 Trustee,

Movant,

v.

EMPOWERHMS LLC, et al.,

Respondents.

 /

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Trustee’s Motion to Compel

EmpowerHMS, LLC & Empower H.I.S., LLC’s Compliance with Subpoenas (DE # 1,

7/17/20). Rule 7.1(c), Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern

District of Florida provides, in pertinent part:

Each party opposing a motion shall serve an opposing

memorandum of law no later than fourteen (14) days after

service of the motion. Failure to do so may be deemed

sufficient cause for granting the motion by default. 

(Emphasis supplied).

On July 21, 2020, the undersigned issued an Order (DE # 6) requiring the

subpoenaed parties to respond to the Trustee’s Motion to Compel EmpowerHMS, LLC

& Empower H.I.S..LLC’s Compliance with Subpoenas (DE # 1, 7/17/20) on or before

August 11, 2020. The Trustee was Ordered to promptly serve the subpoenaed parties

with the Order and file a notice of compliance with this Court once the Order was served

on the subpoenaed parties. On August 5, 2020, the Trustee filed the Trustee’s Notice of

Compliance with the July 21, 2020, Order. The Notice of Compliance indicated that the

Case 1:20-mc-22954-UU Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 1 of 2
Trustee served the Court’s July 21, 2020, Order on EmpowerHMS, LLC on August 4,

2020, and on Empower H.I.S., LLC on July 28, 2020. As of the date of this Order, there

are no responses to the Trustee’s Motion on the docket. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Trustee’s Motion to Compel

EmpowerHMS, LLC & Empower H.I.S., LLC’s Compliance with Subpoenas (DE # 1,

7/17/20) is GRANTED. The subpoenaed parties shall comply with the Trustee’s

subpoenas on or before September 14, 2020. The Trustee shall promptly serve the

subpoenaed parties with this Order and file a notice of compliance with this Court once

this Order has been served on the subpoenaed parties.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 14 day of August, th

2020.

 

JOHN J. O’SULLIVAN

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:20-mc-22954-UU Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 2 of 2
### §1b. Countersignature of certificate of election

The certificate mentioned in section 1a of this title shall be countersigned by the secretary of state of the State.

(R.S. §19.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §19 derived from act July 25, 1866, ch. 245, §3, 14 Stat. 244.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or vld@nrc.gov

I-96-39 June 19, 1996

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Victor Dricks

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $50,000 FINE AGAINST

NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has cited the

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation for four alleged violations of

NRC requirements at the Nine Mile Point 1 Nuclear Station in

Scriba, New York. The staff has proposed a fine of $50,000 for

two of the violations.

The alleged violations were identified during an NRC

inspection conducted between February 17 and March 11. One of

the violations for which the fine is being proposed concerns a

safety vulnerability of the Unit 1 reactor and turbine building

blowout panels. These metal panels, located near the top of the

turbine and reactor buildings, are designed to relieve excess

pressure under some accident conditions. However, based on the

results of the NRC inspection it appears the panels would not

have functioned as designed from the time the plant began

operating in December 1969 through March 1995.

Niagara Mohawk was also cited and fined for its failure, in

October 1993, to perform a proper safety evaluation when it

determined that the wrong size bolts had been installed on the

panels, preventing the panels from functioning as designed. In a

letter to the licensee, NRC Region I Administrator Thomas T.

Martin said, "The NRC is particularly concerned that a weak

safety assessment, coupled with design control deficiencies

involving a calculation error and inadequate design review of

that calculation led to an untimely resolution of the problem

identified in October 1993." The problem has since been

corrected.

The two violations for which the licensee was cited, but not

fined, involve the failure to write a deviation event report to

address human performance and personnel performance problems

adverse to quality, and failure in October 1993, to notify the

NRC within an hour of a condition outside the plant's design

basis.

Niagara Mohawk has 30 days to either pay the proposed fine

or to request in writing that part or all of it be withdrawn.
####
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CIV-61382-RAR

JOSEPH AMODIO,

Plaintiff,

v.

RESURGENT CAPITAL 

SERVICES, L.P., et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon sua sponte review of the docket. On July 9, 

2020, Plaintiff filed his Complaint [ECF No. 1]. Defendant Resurgent Capital Services L.P. 

(“Resurgent”) was served on July 15, 2020, and Defendant Merrick Bank Corp. (“Merrick”) was 

served on July 17, 2020. Under the Court’s Order Requiring Combined Responses [ECF No. 5], 

Defendants were ordered to submit a single combined response or separate answers within the 

time allowed for the last-served Defendant to respond. Per Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, Defendants’ response or answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint was due on or before August 

7, 2020. FED. R. CIV. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i). To date, there is no indication that Defendants have filed 

their response or answer, nor have Defendants requested an extension of time to do so. 

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants shall file their combined response or 

separate answers to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before September 2, 2020 or show good cause as 

to why this Court should not impose sanctions. Failure to do so will result in the entry of default 

against Defendants without further notice.

Case 0:20-cv-61382-RAR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2020 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida this 26th day of August, 2020.

 _________________________________

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 0:20-cv-61382-RAR Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2020 Page 2 of 2
§ 190.102 Procedure. ( a ) *General.* Other provisions of this part relating to direct identification drawback (*see* subpart B of this part) will apply to claims for drawback filed under this subpart insofar as applicable to and not inconsistent with the provisions of this subpart.
( b ) *Manufacturing record.* The manufacturer of flavoring extracts or medicinal or toilet preparations on which drawback is claimed will record the products manufactured, the quantity of waste, if any, and a full description of the alcohol. These records must be available at all times for inspection by CBP officers.
( c ) *Additional information required on the manufacturer's application for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling.* The manufacturer's application for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling, under § 190.8, must state the quantity of domestic tax-paid alcohol contained in each product on which drawback is claimed.
( d ) *Variance in alcohol content* — ( 1 ) *Variance of more than 5 percent.* If the percentage of alcohol contained in an exported medicinal preparation, flavoring extract or toilet preparation varies by more than 5 percent from the percentage of alcohol in the total volume of the product as stated in a previously approved application for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling, the manufacturer must apply for a new specific manufacturing drawback ruling pursuant to § 190.8. If the variation differs from a previously filed schedule, the manufacturer must file a new schedule incorporating the change.
( 2 ) *Variance of 5 percent or less.* Variances of 5 percent or less of the volume of the product must be reported to the drawback office where the drawback entries are liquidated. In such cases, the drawback office may allow drawback without specific authorization from CBP Headquarters.
( e ) *Time period for completing claims.* Drawback claims under this subpart must be completed within 3 years after the date of exportation of the articles upon which drawback is claimed.
( f ) *Filing of drawback entries on duty-paid imported merchandise and tax-paid alcohol.* When the drawback claim covers duty-paid imported merchandise in addition to tax-paid alcohol, the claimant must file one set of entries for drawback of customs duty and another set for drawback of internal revenue tax.
( g ) *Description of the alcohol.* The description of the alcohol that is the subject of the drawback entry may be obtained from the description on the package containing the tax-paid alcohol.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Region II

61 Forsyth Street, S. W.

Atlanta, GA 30303

NO: II-97-44 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404) 562-4416 (Monday, June 9,

1997)

Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417

NRC AND FPC OFFICIALS TO MEET AT 10:00 A.M. JUNE 19

AT CRYSTAL RIVER TO DISCUSS STATUS OF PROGRESS TOWARD PLANT

RESTART

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will meet with Florida

Power Corporation management at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, June 19, to

discuss issues related to the company's efforts to ready the

Crystal River nuclear power plant for restart.

The meeting will be held in Crystal River at the plant's

training center, located on West Venable Street, just off Highway

19, south of town. Turn onto venable at the Crystal River airport

and proceed approximately 1/2 mile to the training center.

The meeting will be open to observation by members of the

public, and NRC officials will be available at its conclusion to

answer questions from observers who attend.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 200 (Monday, October 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23231]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability for Non-Exclusive, Exclusive, or Partially Exclusive 
Licensing of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Concerning Small 
Molecule Inhibitors of Botulinum Toxin

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6 and 404.7, announcement is 
made of the availability for licensing of the invention described in 
U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/501,243 entitled 
``Small Molecule Inhibitors of Botulinum Toxin,'' filed September 8, 
2003. The United States government, as represented by the Secretary of 
the Army, has rights in this invention.

ADDRESSES: Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, 
ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-JA-Z, 504 Scott Street, Fort 
Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702-5012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth 
Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808. For licensing issues, Dr. Paul 
Mele, Office of Research & Technology Assessment, (301) 619-6664, both 
at telefax (301) 619-5034.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-23231 Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
### §795. Bailiffs and messengers

The chief judge of 1 United States Court of Federal Claims, with the approval of the court, may appoint necessary bailiffs and messengers, in such numbers as the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts may approve, each of whom shall be subject to removal by the chief judge, with the approval of the court.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 924; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §121(d)(1), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 35; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(a)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §244 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §139, 36 Stat. 1136).

The provision in section 244 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., that the bailiff should serve 4 years unless sooner removed by the court for cause, was changed by omitting the 4-year tenure and removal "for cause" requirement. As revised this section conforms with sections relating to the similar court officers.

Term "chief messenger" in section 244 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was changed to "messenger" as the court has but one messenger.

A provision of section 244 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., providing for appointment of a clerk and assistant is incorporated in section 791 of this title, and a provision thereof, relating to powers and duties of the clerk, his deputies and assistants, is incorporated in section 956 of this title.

The second paragraph was added to conform with sections 713, 755, and 834 of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court".

1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted "Bailiffs and messengers" for "Bailiff and messenger" in section catchline and, in text, substituted "The chief judge of United States Claims Court, with the approval of the court, may appoint necessary bailiffs and messengers, in such numbers as the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts may approve, each of whom shall be subject to removal by the chief judge, with the approval of the court" for "The Court of Claims may appoint a bailiff and a messenger who shall be subject to removal by the court" and struck out provision that the bailiff attend the court, preserve order, and perform such other necessary duties as the court might direct.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should be "of the".