alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
______________________________________________________________ Page is not included in this copy. Pages 64 through 68 are not included in this copy.

_________________________________________________________________ The material not included contains the following type of information:

__ __ Identity of product inert ingredients.

__ __ Identity of product impurities.

__ __ Description of the product manufacturing process.

__ __ Description of quality control procedures. _____ Identity of the source of product ingredients. _____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. _____ A draft product label.

__ __ The product confidential statement of formula. _____ Information about a pending registration action.

__ __ FIFRA registration data. _____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. _____ The document is not responsive to the request. _____ Internal deliberative information.

__ __ Attorney-client privileged communication.

__ X __ Claimed confidential by submitter upon submission to the Agency. The information not included is generally considered confidential by product registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who prepared the response to your request.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page is not included in this copy. Pages 125 through 126 are not included in this copy.

_________________________________________________________________ The material not included contains the following type of information:

__ __ Identity of product inert ingredients.

__ __ Identity of product impurities.

__ __ Description of the product manufacturing process.

__ __ Description of quality control procedures. _____ Identity of the source of product ingredients. _____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. _____ A draft product label.

__ __ The product confidential statement of formula. _____ Information about a pending registration action.

__ __ FIFRA registration data. _____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. _____ The document is not responsive to the request. _____ Internal deliberative information.

__ __ Attorney-client privileged communication.

__ X __ Claimed confidential by submitter upon submission to the Agency. The information not included is generally considered confidential by product registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who prepared the response to your request.

_________________________________________________________________
#### § 122.80 Verification of statement.

Customs officers may verify any of the statements required under this subpart by examining the shipping records of the airline involved.
CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of GlobalIndustries, Ltd. ("Global") on Form10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") onAugust 8,2005 (the "Report"), theundersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 1350 asadopted pursuant to §§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledgebased upon a review of the Report, that:

        (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

        (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global as of thedates and for periods presented as required by such Report.

 

| /S/ TIMOTHY W. MICIOTTO |
|-------------------------|
| Timothy W. Miciotto     |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| August 8,  2005         |

 

 

        This certification is provided pursuant to §§ 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Global or the certifying officerfor purposes of §§ 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

        A signed original of this written statement required by§§ 906 has been provided to Global and will be retained by itand furnished to the SEC or its staff uponrequest.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-28 June 29, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC PROPOSES $2,750 FINE FOR

SYNCOR INTERNATIONAL CORP.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $2,750 civil penalty for Syncor

International Corp., a supplier of radioactive pharmaceuticals for hospitals and medical clinics with

headquarters in Woodland Hills, Calif., for safety violations that allowed a package of radioactive

material to fall from a delivery truck in July last year.

The incident took place near Syncor facilities in Newburgh, New York, when a package

containing an 850-millicurie molybdenum-99/technetium-99m radionuclide generator fell from a

Syncor delivery truck traveling from the company’s Stamford, Conn., facility. The driver recovered

the package intact after a short time and no one was exposed to radiation.

An NRC investigation determined that a safety violation involving a failure to secure, or brace,

the package inside the truck allowed the package to fall out of the truck during transit. A second

violation involved a failure to assure that a door locking mechanism on the Syncor vehicle was

adequate to meet NRC security requirements for radioactive material when the vehicle was left

unattended for short periods of time during routine deliveries.

Both violations contributed to the incident involving temporary loss of the generator package.

The second violation posed a risk of unauthorized access to or theft of material when the vehicle was

left unattended.

In a letter to Syncor president Robert Funari, NRC Regional Administrator Ellis W. Merschoff

said, “ . . . to emphasize the importance of assuring the security of radioactive material in transit, I have

been authorized . . . to issue the enclosed Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty

in the amount of $2,750 for the Severity Level III problem described above and in the Notice.” The

NRC rates violations on a four-level scale, with Level I being the most serious.

At a predecisional enforcement conference to discuss the violations on April 18, Syncor

officials discussed corrective actions the company has taken to prevent similar problems in the future,

including inspection of all trucks with similar locking mechanisms, improved driver training and

increased checks by managers and auditors.
Syncor has 30 days to pay the penalty or file a protest. If the protest is denied, the company

may request a hearing by the NRC.

##
### §714. State administration

The application of any State rule or policy relating to the administration or operation of programs funded by this chapter (including any rule or policy based on State interpretation of any Federal law, regulation, or guideline) shall be identified as a State imposed requirement.

(Pub. L. 93–112, §17, formerly §15, as added Pub. L. 105–220, title IV, §403, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1114; renumbered §17, Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(f) [title VIII, §402(a)(1)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–412.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in section 716 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–220.

A prior section 714, Pub. L. 93–112, §15, as added Pub. L. 95–602, title I, §122(a)(10), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2986; amended Pub. L. 96–374, title XIII, §1322, Oct. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 1499; Pub. L. 98–221, title I, §104(a)(1), Feb. 22, 1984, 98 Stat. 18; Pub. L. 99–506, title I, §103(d)(2)(C), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1810; Pub. L. 102–569, title I, §102(p)(6), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4356, related to information clearinghouse, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–220, title IV, §403, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1093. See section 712 of this title.

A prior section 17 of Pub. L. 93–112 was renumbered section 19 and is classified to section 716 of this title.

Another prior section 17 of Pub. L. 93–112 was classified to section 716 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–220.
#### § 171.14 Headquarters advice.

The advice of the Director, Border Security and Trade Compliance Division, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade, CBP Headquarters, or his designee, may be sought in any case (except as provided in this section), without regard to delegated authority to act on a petition or offer, when a novel or complex issue concerning a ruling, policy, or procedure is presented concerning a CBP action(s) or potential CBP action(s) relating to seizures and forfeitures, penalties, or mitigating or remitting any claim. This section does not apply to actual duty loss tenders determined by CBP pursuant to § 162.74(c) of this Chapter relating to prior disclosure and to actual duty loss demands made under § 162.79b of this Chapter. The request for advice may be initiated by the alleged violator or any CBP officer, but must be submitted to the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer. The Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer retains the authority to refuse to forward any request that fails to raise a qualifying issue and to seek legal advice from the appropriate Associate or Assistant Chief Counsel in any case.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-01-017 May 10, 2001

CONTACT: Breck Henderson 

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC FINDS NO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

FROM EXTENDED OPERATION OF ANO-1

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued its final environmental impact

statement on the proposed renewal of the operating license for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1 (ANO-1)

nuclear power plant in Russellville, Arkansas. In the report, the NRC staff found there should be no

significant environmental impacts from an additional 20 years of plant operation and recommends that

the Commission determine there are no impacts that would preclude renewal of the license for

environmental reasons.

Entergy Operations, Inc. submitted an application to the NRC in January, 2000, to renew the

license for ANO-1 for another 20 years. The current license for Unit 1 expires on May 20, 2014.

As part of its environmental review of the application, the NRC held four public meetings --

two on April 4 and two on November 14 last year -- regarding the scope of and a draft version of the

environmental impact statement to receive comments from members of the public, local officials and

representatives of other agencies. The NRC has submitted the final environmental impact statement to

the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which published a notice of its availability in the Federal

Register on May 4. Separately, the NRC issued a notice of its availability on May 3. 

###
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

06/19

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
### §64b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 64b was editorially reclassified as section 6533 of this title.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 545 

To permanently exempt payments made from the Railroad Unemployment 

Insurance Account from sequestration under the Balanced Budget and 

Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2 (legislative day, MARCH 1), 2021 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. BROWN, and Mrs. FISCHER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To permanently exempt payments made from the Railroad 

Unemployment Insurance Account from sequestration 

under the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Railroad Employee Eq5 uity and Fairness Act’’ or the ‘‘REEF Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 545 IS

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF PAYMENTS FROM THE RAILROAD 

2 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACCOUNT. 

3 (a) AMENDMENTS.—Section 235 of the Continued 

4 Assistance to Rail Workers Act of 2020 (subchapter III 

5 of title II of division N of Public Law 116–260) is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) in subsection (b)— 

8 (A) by striking paragraphs (1) and (2); 

9 and 

10 (B) by striking ‘‘subsection (a)—’’ and in11 serting ‘‘subsection (a) shall take effect 7 days 

12 after the date of enactment of the Continued 

13 Assistance to Rail Workers Act of 2020.’’; and 

14 (2) by striking subsection (c). 

15 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by sub16 section (a) shall apply as if enacted on the date before 

17 the date on which the national emergency concerning the 

18 novel coronavirus disease (COVID–19) outbreak declared 

19 by the President on March 13, 2020, under the National 

20 Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) terminates. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1


                           GREG MANNING AUCTIONS, INC.
                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Greg Manning Auctions,
Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2003, I, Greg Manning, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Greg Manning Auctions, Inc., hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     1.   this Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies
          with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended
          December 31, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
          financial condition and results of operations of Greg Manning
          Auctions, Inc.

Dated:   February 3, 2004
                                          /s/ Greg Manning
                                          -------------------------------
                                          Greg Manning, President and Chief
                                          Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23


<PAGE>
                       [Baird, Kurtz & Dobson letterhead]




                       Consent of Independent Accountants



Board of Directors
Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-47241
on Form S-8 of Guaranty  Federal  Bancshares,  Inc. of our report dated July 27,
1998,   relating  to  the  consolidated   balance  sheets  of  Guaranty  Federal
Bancshares,  Inc.  as of June 30, 1998 and 1997,  and the  related  consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ending June 30, 1998,  which report appears in the
June 30, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc.



                                            /s/ Baird, Kurtz & Dobson


September 25, 1998
Springfield, Missouri
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No.: 1:20-cv-23287-DPG

LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, et al., |

|

Plaintiffs, |

|

v. |

|

IMPERIAL BRANDS PLC, et al., |

|

Defendants. |

|

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Notice is hereby given that Ryan K. Todd of Nelson Mullins Broad and Cassel enters his 

appearance as counsel for Defendant, Imperial Brands PLC, in this action. All pleadings, papers, 

and correspondence in this matter should be served upon undersigned counsel at 

ryan.todd@nelsonmullins.com.

Dated: August 28, 2020. Respectfully submitted,

NELSON MULLINS BROAD AND CASSEL

2 S. Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2100

Miami, FL 33131

Telephone: 305.373.9400

Facsimile: 305.995.6449

By: /s/ Ryan K. Todd

Ryan K. Todd

Fla. Bar No. 91679

ryan.todd@nelsonmullins.com

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2020 Page 1 of 1
§ 118.4 Responsibilities of a CES operator. By signing the agreement and commencing operation of a CES, an operator agrees to: ( a ) Maintain the facility designated as the CES in conformity with the security standards as outlined in the approved application;
( b ) Provide adequate personnel and equipment to ensure reliable service for the opening, presentation for inspection, and closing of all types of cargo designated for examination by Customs. Such service must be provided on a “first come-first served” basis;
( c ) Assess service fees as outlined in the fee schedule included in the approved application or as changed under § 118.5 of this part and bill users directly for services rendered;
( d ) Assume responsibility for any charges or expenses incurred in connection with the operation of the CES;
( e ) Maintain, at his own expense, adequate liability insurance with respect to the property within his control and with respect to persons having access to the CES;
( f ) Keep current the list filed with the port director pursuant to § 118.11(f) of this part. Additions to or deletions from the list must be submitted in writing to the port director within 10 calendar days of the commencement or termination of employment;
( g ) Maintain a Customs custodial bond in an amount set by the port director. The CES operator will accept and keep safe all merchandise delivered to the CES for examination. The bond will include liability for transporting merchandise to the CES from within the district boundaries (see definition of “district” at § 112.1); such liability is assumed by the CES operator when he picks up merchandise for transportation to his facility. The operator also agrees to increase the amount of the bond if deemed appropriate by the port director.
( h ) Maintain and make available for Customs examination all records connected with the operation of the CES in accordance with part 162 of this chapter and retain such records for a period of not less than five years from the date of the transaction or examination conducted pursuant to the agreement to operate the CES;
( i ) Submit, if requested by Customs, the fingerprints of all employees involved in the CES operation;
( j ) Provide office space, parking spaces, appropriate sanitary facilities, and potable water to Customs personnel at no charge or a charge of $1 per year; and
( k ) Perform in accordance with any other reasonable requirements imposed by the port director.
( l ) Provide transportation for merchandise to the CES from within the district boundaries (see definition of “district” at § 112.1). This responsibility is optional. If the CES operator chooses to provide transportation, he shall receipt for the merchandise when he picks it up and assume liability for the merchandise at that time.
[T.D. 93-6, 58 FR 5604, Jan. 22, 1993, as amended by T.D. 94-81, 59 FR 51495, Oct. 12, 1994; T.D. 95-77, 60 FR 50020, Sept. 27, 1995; T.D. 98-29, 63 FR 16684, Apr. 6, 1998]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-23297-CIV-WILLIAMS

CASE NO. 19-20122-CR-WILLIAMS

ROLAND RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff,

vs.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

/

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid’s report 

and recommendation (DE 13) (“Report”).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Plaintiff filed a pro se Motion to Vacate attacking 

the constitutionality of his conviction and sentence for Hobbs Act robbery and related 

offenses in Case No. 19-20122-CR-Williams. (DE 1). In the Report, Magistrate Reid 

recommends Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate be dismissed without prejudice for failure to 

comply with Court orders.1 Plaintiff did not file objections to the Report, and the time to 

do so has passed.

Upon an independent review of the Report, the record, and applicable case law, it 

is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the conclusions in the Report (DE 13) are 

AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

1 On August 10, 2020 the Court ordered Plaintiff to file an affidavit and evidence of his claim. (DE 6). On 

October 16, 2020, the Court again ordered Plaintiff to file an affidavit setting forth his testimony and 

evidence of his claim no later than November 13, 2020. (DE 11). Since the Plaintiff filed his initial Motion to 

Vacate on August 6, 2020, he has not filed any additional materials or complied with the Court’s orders. 

Case 1:20-cv-23297-KMW Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/03/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

For the reasons set forth in the Report, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 

All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT, and the Clerk is directed to CLOSE this 

case.

DONE AND ORDERED in chambers in Miami, Florida, this 2nd day of February, 

2021.

CC: Roland Rodriguez, Pro Se

Reg. No. 18034-104

F.C.I. - Butner Medium II

Inmate Mail/Parcels

Post Office Box 1500

Butner, NC 27509

Peter Link, AUSA

US Coast Guard

Seventh District

909 SE First Ave Suite 918

Miami, FL 33131

Email: peter.link@usdoj.gov

Case 1:20-cv-23297-KMW Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/03/2021 Page 2 of 2
### §529. Prohibition on certain discipline by labor organization

It shall be unlawful for any labor organization, or any officer, agent, shop steward, or other representative of a labor organization, or any employee thereof to fine, suspend, expel, or otherwise discipline any of its members for exercising any right to which he is entitled under the provisions of this chapter. The provisions of section 412 of this title shall be applicable in the enforcement of this section.

(Pub. L. 86–257, title VI, §609, Sept. 14, 1959, 73 Stat. 541.)
#### § 19.5 [Reserved]