alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-055 August 22, 2002

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NOTE TO EDITORS:

PRE-HEARING CONFERENCE ON IP2 LICENSE AMENDMENT IS CANCELED

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board pre-hearing conference

on a license amendment for the Indian Point 2 nuclear power plant has been canceled. The plant,

located in Buchanan, NY, is operated by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Entergy had requested a license amendment for a one-time five-year extension of the period

within which to conduct the containment integrated leak rate test, which normally would be required

every 10 years. Riverkeeper, Inc., had submitted a petition to intervene and a pre-hearing conference

was scheduled for next Tuesday, August 27.

In accordance with NRC regulations, which allow the NRC staff to issue an amendment prior

to, but subject to, the outcome of any associated hearings, the NRC staff issued the amendment on

August 5.

On August 21, Riverkeeper notified the Board that it was withdrawing its petition for

intervention and consenting to the issuance of the amendment without further proceedings.

###
#### § 148.110 Applicability.

The provisions of this subpart are applicable to articles not accompanying a person, including a crewmember, which are purchased in *and* shipped from American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or the Virgin Islands of the United States. However, this subpart is not applicable to the importation of unaccompanied articles in a manner prohibited by law or regulation (e.g., mail shipments of alcoholic beverages or alcoholic beverages shipped other than by mail in excess of quantities authorized by State laws or regulations).

The following is a summary of the procedure to be followed to obtain the benefits of this subpart: A person purchasing articles in American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or the Virgin Islands of the United States would receive a sales slip, invoice, or other evidence of purchase which he would present to the Customs officer along with his baggage declaration, Customs Form 6059-B, and a Declaration of Unaccompanied Articles, Customs Form 255. The latter form is prepared in triplicate for each shipment to follow. The Customs officer would verify the information, indicate on the form whether the article or articles were free of duty, dutiable at the flat rate, or a combination of the foregoing, and validate the form. Two copies would be returned to the traveler, who would send one form to the vendor. Upon receipt of the form the vendor would place it in an envelope, affix it to the outside of the package, clearly mark the package “Unaccompanied Tourist Shipment,” and send the package to the traveler, generally via mail, although it could be sent by other means. If sent through the mail, the package would be examined by Customs and forwarded to the Postal Service for delivery. Any duties due would be collected by the mailman. If the shipment arrives other than through the mail, the traveler would be notified by the carrier when the article arrives. Entry would be made by the carrier or the traveler at the customhouse. Any duties due would be collected at that time.

[T.D. 78-394, 43 FR 49790, Oct. 25, 1978; 43 FR 55758, Nov. 29, 1978; T.D. 97-75, 62 FR 46443, Sept. 3, 1997]
HomeAbout NRCHow We Regulate

# Allegations

The NRC's Allegation Program deals with concerns associated with NRC requirements and wrongdoing by individuals or organizations who are --
        - Licensed by the NRC
        - Applicants for licenses
        - Licensee contractors or vendors
        - Employees of any of the above

The Allegation Program does not evaluate issues concerning the conduct of NRC employees or NRC contractors which come under the purview of the NRC's Office of the Inspector General.

A brief summary of the allegation program can be found in our brochure on Reporting Safety Concerns to the NRC (NUREG/BR-0240). For additional information, see our Backgrounder on Allegation Process and NRC staff guidance in Management Directive 8.8, "Management of Allegations," and the Allegation Manual.

For more information on our Allegation program, see the following:
        - What is an Allegation?
        - Frequently Asked Questions
        - Allegations Annual Reports
        - Report a Safety or Security Concern
        - Statistics on Allegations
        - Safety Conscious Work Environment Guidance Documents
        - Public Meetings

If you are interested in decisions the Department of Labor has issued concerning claims of discrimination filed under the Energy Reorganization Act, see the following web page, which lists decisions by DOL Administrative Law Judges and the Administrative Review Board.
        - Adjudicatory Decisions by the U.S. Department of Labor

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 7, 2020

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Rulemaking
          - Guidance Development
          - Generic Communications Program
          - Standards Development
          - Licensing
          - Certification
          - Inspection
          - Assessment of Performance for Operating Facilities
          - Enforcement
          - Investigations
          - Allegations
          - Events Assessment
          - Generic Issues
          - Research
          - Risk Assessment
          - Performance Assessment for Waste Disposal and Decommissioning
          - Advisory Activities
          - CRGR Reviews
          - Adjudications (Hearings)
          - NMSS Center of Expertise

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - License Renewal Generic Environmental Review
                - Job Openings
                - Palisades Restart
                - Environmental Justice 
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - Transformation at the NRC - Updated
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Nuclear Security
                - Strategic Plan

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, July 7, 2020
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

 

No. I-02-001 January 4, 2002

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: OPA1@NRC.GOV

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

HADDAM NECK, YANKEE ROWE DECOMMISSIONING WORK TO BE DISCUSSED

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of the Haddam Neck and

Yankee Rowe nuclear power plants on Thursday, January 10, to receive an update on decommissioning

activities at those facilities.

 The meeting will begin at 10 a.m. in the Public Meeting Room at the NRC Region I Office in

King of Prussia, Pa. NRC staff will be available after the meeting to answer questions from interested

members of the public.

 Haddam Neck, located in Haddam, Conn., and operated by the Connecticut Yankee Atomic

Power Company, ceased operations in December 1996. Yankee Rowe, located in Rowe, Mass., and

operated by the Yankee Atomic Power Company, was permanently shut down in October 1991. The

two companies are jointly working on the decommissioning of the two plants.

 Among the decommissioning topics to be discussed are schedules, spent fuel storage plans and

activities, and the removal of components.

 ###
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (i)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s / Jeffrey L. KarafaJeffrey L. KarafaTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer,Dearborn Bancorp, Inc.
 42
### **CHAPTER 24—GEOTHERMAL ENERGY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEMONSTRATION**
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF FEDERAL DATA CORPORATION

                                 State of                  Doing
Subsidiaries                   Incorporated           Business Names
------------                   ------------           --------------


FDCT Corp.                      Delaware          FDCT Corp.

FDC Technologies, Inc.          Delaware          FDC Technologies, Inc.

DoxSys, Inc.                    Delaware          DoxSys, Inc.

VAD International, Inc.         Maryland          VAD International, Inc.

NYMA, Inc.                      Maryland          NYMA, Inc.

Sylvest Management                                Sylvest Management
 Systems Corporation            Maryland           Systems Corporation

R.O.W. Sciences, Inc.           Delaware          R.O.W. Sciences, Inc.

Technical and Management                          Technical and Management
 Assistance, Inc.               New Jersey         Assistance, Inc.
### §5329. Vouchers

Payments under sections 5327 to 5329 of this title shall be made on vouchers approved by the Committee on House Oversight of the House of Representatives and signed by the chairman of such committee.

(Pub. L. 97–51, §101(c), Oct. 1, 1981, 95 Stat. 959; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §204(44), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1736.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 92b–3 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is based on section 3 of House Resolution 804, Ninety-sixth Congress, Oct. 2, 1980, as enacted into permanent law by H.R. 4120, as reported July 9, 1981, which was enacted into permanent law by section 101(c) of Pub. L. 97–51.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "House Oversight of the House of Representatives" for "House Administration".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on House Oversight of House of Representatives changed to Committee on House Administration of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Jan. 6, 1999.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1369

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow an above-the-line 

deduction for overnight travel expenses of National Guard and Reserve 

members. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 19, 2003

Mr. RAMSTAD (for himself, Mr. CRANE, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Mr. SANDLIN, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. BUYER, and Mr. TAYLOR

of Mississippi) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow an 

above-the-line deduction for overnight travel expenses of 

National Guard and Reserve members.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Guard and 

5 Reserve Tax Relief Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 1369 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ABOVE-THE-LINE DEDUCTION FOR OVERNIGHT 

2 TRAVEL EXPENSES OF NATIONAL GUARD 

3 AND RESERVE MEMBERS. 

4 (a) DEDUCTION ALLOWED.—Section 162 of the In5 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain trade or 

6 business expenses) is amended by redesignating subsection 

7 (p) as subsection (q) and inserting after subsection (o) the 

8 following new subsection: 

9 ‘‘(p) TREATMENT OF EXPENSES OF MEMBERS OF

10 RESERVE COMPONENTS OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE

11 UNITED STATES.—For purposes of subsection (a)(2), in 

12 the case of an individual who performs services as a mem13 ber of a reserve component of the Armed Forces of the 

14 United States at any time during the taxable year, such 

15 individual shall be deemed to be away from home in the 

16 pursuit of a trade or business for any period during which 

17 such individual is away from home in connection with such 

18 service.’’. 

19 (b) DEDUCTION ALLOWED WHETHER OR NOT TAX20 PAYER ELECTS TO ITEMIZE.—Section 62(a)(2) of such 

21 Code (relating to certain trade and business deductions 

22 of employees) is amended by adding at the end the fol23 lowing new subparagraph: 

24 ‘‘(E) CERTAIN EXPENSES OF MEMBERS OF

25 RESERVE COMPONENTS OF THE ARMED FORCES

26 OF THE UNITED STATES.—The deductions al-
3

•HR 1369 IH 

1 lowed by section 162 which consist of expenses, 

2 determined at a rate not in excess of the rates 

3 for travel expenses (including per diem in lieu 

4 of subsistence) authorized for employees of 

5 agencies under subchapter I of chapter 57 of 

6 title 5, United States Code, paid or incurred by 

7 the taxpayer in connection with the perform8 ance of services by such taxpayer as a member 

9 of a reserve component of the Armed Forces of 

10 the United States for any period during which 

11 such individual is more than 100 miles away 

12 from home in connection with such services.’’. 

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred in tax15 able years beginning after December 31, 2002.

Æ
##### 



1.
    
    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  March 19, 2007
    /s/ STEPHEN M. WAGMANStephen M. WagmanExecutive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
No: IV-23-007 July 10, 2023

CONTACT: Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128

NRC Names Nathan Brown Resident Inspector 

At Callaway Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Nathan Brown as 

the new resident inspector at the Callaway nuclear power plant in Fulton, 

Missouri. 

“Nathan’s training and commitment to safety will help the NRC in 

its mission of protecting people and the environment by helping assure that 

Callaway continues to meet the high standards set by the agency,” said NRC 

Region IV Acting Administrator Rob Lewis. 

Brown joined the NRC in 2019 as a project engineer. Most recently 

he served as a resident inspector at Arkansas Nuclear One in Russellville, Arkansas. Brown 

previously served nine years in the Navy’s nuclear power program. He holds a bachelor’s degree in 

nuclear engineering from Texas A&M University. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two resident inspectors. Brown joins 

senior resident inspector Scott Schwind at Callaway. They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the 

facility, conduct regular inspections, monitor plant operations and significant work projects, and 

interact with plant workers and the public.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 522 

To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, to include 

a link to a 100-word plain language summary of the proposed rule. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2 (legislative day, MARCH 1), 2021 

Mr. LANKFORD (for himself, Ms. SINEMA, Mr. RISCH, and Mr. JOHNSON) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require each agency, in providing notice of a rule making, 

to include a link to a 100-word plain language summary 

of the proposed rule. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Account5 ability Through Transparency Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO POST A 100-WORD SUMMARY TO 

7 REGULATIONS.GOV. 

8 Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 522 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

2 end; 

3 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at 

4 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(4) the Internet address of a summary of not 

8 more than 100 words in length of the proposed rule, 

9 in plain language, that shall be posted on the Inter10 net website under section 206(d) of the E-Govern11 ment Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note) (commonly 

12 known as regulations.gov).’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          13,645
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,012
<PP&E>                                       1,864,464
<DEPRECIATION>                               (198,943)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,782,374
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,365
<BONDS>                                      1,131,128
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,079
<OTHER-SE>                                     572,802
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,782,374
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,328
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (34,287)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (632)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (15,439)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,848
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,848
<DISCONTINUED>                                  58,647
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (377)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,576
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.54
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
     from the June 30, 1999 Form 10-Q and is qualified in its
     entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                         <C>                   <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>               3-MOS                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1999       JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999       JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                           36,101             36,101
<SECURITIES>                          0                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                    24,893             24,893
<ALLOWANCES>                        968                968
<INVENTORY>                           0                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 70,195             70,195
<PP&E>                           39,365             39,365
<DEPRECIATION>                   21,754             21,754
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  238,387            238,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            14,534             14,534
<BONDS>                               0                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0                  0
<PREFERRED>                           0                  0
<COMMON>                            194                194
<OTHER-SE>                       93,157             93,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    238,387            238,387
<SALES>                               0                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 28,608             53,990
<CGS>                                 0                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    10,926             20,811
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  2,553              5,028
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                2,325              4,654
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   7,123             12,440
<INCOME-TAX>                      2,821              4,976
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               4,302              7,464
<DISCONTINUED>                        0                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0                  0
<CHANGES>                             0                  0
<NET-INCOME>                      4,302              7,464
<EPS-BASIC>                      0.25               0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0.25               0.43


</TABLE>
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-01-050 December 26, 2001

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 or Roger Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

NRC DETERMINES SURRY NUCLEAR PLANT DIESEL GENERATOR ISSUE

TO BE OF LOW TO MODERATE SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has completed its significance determination of

an inspection finding at Virginia Powerís Surry nuclear plant near Surry, Virginia, and concluded that

the finding was White (low to moderate safety significance).

The inspection finding relates to the Surry plant staffís discovery of failed components in one

emergency diesel generator and degraded components in another. The NRC staff had characterized the

finding as Yellow (substantial importance to safety) on a preliminary basis. At a regulatory conference

with the NRC staff in late November, Virginia Power officials presented their position on the issue and

their assessment of its significance. The company presented information covering the availability of an

alternate diesel, plant staff inspections of the equipment, differences in risk analyses and other factors. 

After reviewing all the information, the NRC staff determined that its preliminary assessment was

overly conservative and the issue should be characterized as White. 

The safety significance of each NRC inspection finding is characterized by a color -- green,

white, yellow, or red. The agency response to the inspection findings is based on the significance of the

items. A green finding receives normal NRC oversight, while white, yellow, or red assessments result

in increasing NRC involvement, including additional inspections. 

The NRC staff will inform Virginia Power of the specific additional inspections or other

actions to be taken at the Surry plant at a later date. 

###