alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Catalyst Paper Corporation



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER



I, Kevin J. Clarke, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Catalyst Paper Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, to
which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 15, 2013



| | By: | \\s\\Kevin J. Clarke
| | --- | --------------------
| |     | Name:               
| |     | Title:              















Catalyst Paper Corporation



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER



I, Brian Baarda, the Vice-President, Finance
and Chief Financial Officer of Catalyst Paper Corporation, (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, to
which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 15, 2013



| | By: | \\s\\ Brian Baarda
| | --- | ------------------
| |     | Name:             
| |     | Title:
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CEO
      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**


**RULE
      13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934** **AND**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002** *****







In
      connection with the Annual Report of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10 - - K
      for the
      period ending December
      31, 2005 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Shaun A. Burke, Chief Executive Officer (principal
      executive officer) of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes - - Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.







/s/
      Shaun A. Burke


Shaun
      A.
      Burke


Chief
      Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)




March
      31,
      2006




*
      A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-10 May 4, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC, ENTERGY TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS

AT ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a predecisional enforcement conference

Monday, May 8, with officials of Entergy Operations, Inc., operators of the Arkansas Nuclear One,

Unit 1, nuclear power plant in Russellville, Arkansas, to discuss two apparent violations of NRC

requirements identified during a special inspection of the plant’s low pressure injection/decay heat

removal system.

The conference will begin at 1 p.m. at NRC Region IV offices in Arlington, Texas. The

meeting will be open to public observation; NRC officials will be available afterward for questions.

The NRC special inspection was conducted at ANO, Unit 1, after both low pressure

injection/decay heat removal pumps were declared inoperable on February 5 due to high bearing

temperatures. The first apparent violation involves the plant engineering department’s failure to

complete adequate evaluations for the replacement of the pumps’ cast iron bearing housings with

stainless steel housings and a change in lubricating oil viscosity. These modifications apparently led to

the overheating.

The second apparent violation is that the low pressure injection pumps were inoperable from at

least January 28 until February 5, which is a violation of plant technical specifications.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that NRC has

made a determination that violations did occur or that enforcement action will be taken. The purpose

of the meeting is to discuss the apparent violations, their causes and safety significance, and to provide

Entergy officials with an opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC

inspection report and present corrective actions that have been taken or planned.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action will be made at

this conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials at a later date.

###
## NO. 12

- 09

- 00 176

- C R

NO. 12

- 09

- 00177

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

TONY FITZGERALD PRICE

, APPELLANT ' APPEAL S FROM THE 217 TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, ' ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS

APP ELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss these appeals. The motion is signed by

Appellant and his counsel. No opinion has been delivered in th ese appeal s . Accordingly,

Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, an d th ese appeal s are dismissed

. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 42.2 (a).

Opinion delivered August 25 , 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
#### § 208.40 Reimbursement of fringe benefit costs during Activation.

(a) Except as specified in [§ 208.40 (c) of this subpart](/on/2024-09-09/title-44/part-208/section-208.40#p-208.40(c)), DHS will reimburse the Sponsoring Agency for fringe benefit costs incurred during Activation according to the following table:

| If the Sponsoring Agency or Participating Agency \* \* \* | Then the Sponsoring Agency or Participating Agency must \* \* \* | Example |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (1) Incurs a fringe benefit cost based on the number of base hours worked by a System Member, | Bill DHS for a pro-rata share of the premium based on the number of base hours worked during Activation | The City Fire Department incurs a premium of 3 percent for dental coverage based on the number of base hours worked in a week (53 hours). The City should bill DHS an additional 3 percent of the firefighter's converted compensation for the first 40 hours Activation. |
| (2) Incurs a fringe benefit cost based on the number of hours a System Member actually worked (base hours and overtime), | Bill DHS for a pro-rata share of the premium based on the number of hours each System Member worked during Activation | The City Fire Department pays a premium of 12 percent for retirement based on the number of hours worked by a firefighter. The City should bill DHS an additional 12 percent of the firefighter's total compensation during Activation. |
| (3) Incurs a fringe benefit cost on a yearly basis based on the number of people employed full-time during the year, | Bill DHS for a pro-rata share of those fringe benefit costs based on the number of non-overtime hours worked during Activation by System Members employed full time | The City Fire Department pays workers compensation premiums into the City risk fund for the following year, based on the number of full-time firefighters employed during the current year. The City should bill DHS for workers compensation premium costs by multiplying the hourly fringe benefit rate or amount by the number of non-overtime hours worked during Activation by full time firefighters who are System Members. |

(b) *Differential pay.* DHS will reimburse the Sponsoring Agency for direct costs incurred because of any separate differential compensation paid for work performed during an Activation including, but not limited to, differentials paid for holidays, night work, hazardous duty, or other paid fringe benefits, provided such differentials are not otherwise reimbursed under [paragraph (a)](/on/2024-09-09/title-44/section-208.40#p-208.40(a)) of this section. A detailed explanation of the differential payment for which the Sponsoring Agency seeks reimbursement must accompany any request for reimbursement under this section together with identification of every fringe benefit sought under [§ 208.40(a) of this part](/on/2024-09-09/title-44/part-208/section-208.40#p-208.40(a)) and the method used to calculate each such payment and the reimbursement sought from DHS.

(c) DHS will not reimburse the Sponsoring Agency for fringe benefit costs for Affiliated Personnel.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 99-06 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson March 24,1999

OFFICE: 817-860-8128

JOHN HANNA ASSIGNED RESIDENT INSPECTOR

FOR NRC AT CALLAWAY

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has assigned John Hanna as resident inspector for

the Callaway nuclear power plant near Fulton, Missouri. Mr. Hanna assumed his duties on March 23.

Mr. Hanna is a 1990 graduate of Georgia Institute of Technology. He holds a bachelor’s

degree in Mechanical Engineering with speciality in bio-engineering. He also studied organizational

development psychology -- a field that encompasses ergonomics, human factors and workplace

performance.

Mr. Hanna began his career in nuclear engineering at the Norfolk Naval Shipyard, in Norfolk,

Virginia, where he worked as a shift test engineer overseeing maintenance and repair work on

nuclear-powered Navy vessels. He also taught reactor physics, wrote procedures and was head of

work control for the overhaul of USS Baltimore, an attack submarine.

Since joining the NRC in October 1997, Mr. Hanna has had a variety of assignments in

training and preparation for his duties at Callaway. He plans to reside in Columbia.

###
<PAGE>

DEARBORN BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q (continued)

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the "Form
10-K") of Dearborn Bancorp, Inc. (the "Issuer").

         I, Jeffrey L. Karafa, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the
         Issuer, certify that:

         (i)      The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                  (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)     The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Issuer.

Dated: August 10, 2004

                                                 /s/ Jeffrey L. Karafa
                                             ------------------------------
                                                    Jeffrey L. Karafa
                                          Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer,
                                                   Dearborn Bancorp, Inc.
#### Edwin P. Kohl, Respondent, v. Hamilton Roddis et al., Appellants.

Ho opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant the motion to dismiss the complaint.
### §4533. Single per annum gross rates of pay for employees

Whenever the rate of pay of an employee whose pay is disbursed by the Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives is fixed or adjusted on or after the effective date of this section, that rate, as so fixed or adjusted, shall be a single per annum gross rate.

(Pub. L. 91–510, title IV, §471, Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1193; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §210(1), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1743.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 331 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "Chief Administrative Officer" for "Clerk".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective immediately prior to noon on Jan. 3, 1971, see section 601(1) of Pub. L. 91–510, set out as an Effective Date of 1970 Amendment note under section 4301 of this title.

#### Inconsistent Provisions

Pub. L. 91–510, title IV, §477(b), Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1195, provided that: "All provisions of law inconsistent with any provision of this Part [Part 7 of title IV of Pub. L. 91–510, see Tables for classification] are hereby superseded to the extent of the inconsistency."

[Pub. L. 91–510, title IV, §477(b), set out above, effective immediately prior to noon on Jan. 3, 1971, see section 601(1) of Pub. L. 91–510, set out as an Effective Date of 1970 Amendment note under section 4301 of this title.]
### §142a. Office of administrative assistant and disbursing officer in Library of Congress abolished; transfer of duties to appointee of Librarian

From and after June 10, 1928, the office of administrative assistant and disbursing officer of the Library of Congress, created by section 142 of this title, is abolished and thereafter the duties required to be performed by the administrative assistant and disbursing officer shall be performed, under the direction of the Librarian of Congress, by such persons as the Librarian may appoint for those purposes.

(May 11, 1928, ch. 521, 45 Stat. 497; Pub. L. 92–310, title II, §220(h), June 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 205.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 142 of this title, referred to in text, was omitted from the Code.

#### Amendments

1972—Pub. L. 92–310 struck out provisions which required the person disbursing appropriations for Library of Congress and Botanic Garden to give a bond in sum of $30,000.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Disbursement functions of all Government agencies, except Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force and Panama Canal transferred to Division of Disbursements, Treasury Department, by Ex. Ord. No. 6166, §4, June 10, 1933, and Ex. Ord. No. 6728, May 29, 1934.

Division subsequently consolidated with other agencies into Fiscal Service in Treasury Department by Reorg. Plan No. III of 1940, §1(a)(1), eff. June 30, 1940, 5 F.R. 2107, 54 Stat. 1231. See section 306 of Title 31, Money and Finance.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-13 February 8, 1999

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC ISSUES CONFIRMATORY ORDER TO SPECIAL TESTING LABORATORIES,

ALLOWING RESUMPTION OF LICENSED ACTIVITIES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued a confirmatory order to Special

Testing Laboratories of Bethel, Conn., allowing the company to resume taking part in NRC

licensed activities, as long as certain conditions are met.

The order, which confirms an agreement reached with the company, requires, in part,

that: Richard C. Speciale replace Richard A. Speciale as the Special Testing Laboratories’

Radiation Safety Officer. It also specifies that Richard A. Speciale will refrain from any

involvement or influence in the conduct of NRC licensed activities, and that the company will

notify the NRC if those conditions are not met. The order also requires the company to retain

the services of an independent consultant to perform eight quarterly audits of the Special

Testing Laboratories’ radiation safety program, beginning 30 days from receipt of the order.

Special Testing Laboratories in Bethel, Conn., is authorized to possess and use portable

nuclear gauges. An NRC order issued in December required the company to suspend all

activities under its NRC license. That action stemmed from an inspection in the fall which

determined that Richard A. Speciale had provided information to the NRC regarding the number

of gauges being used as well as the number of users and their training, all of which he knew

was not complete and accurate in all material respects. In addition, Mr. Speciale admitted that

he had “never stopped using the nuclear gauges” after a license issued to another company,

Testwell Craig Laboratories of Connecticut, Inc., (where he was also president) was

suspended for nonpayment of fees.

In the confirmatory order, NRC Deputy Executive Director for Regulatory Effectiveness,

Malcolm R. Knapp, said, “implementation of the commitments will provide assurance that

sufficient resources will be applied to the radiation safety program, and that the program will be

conducted safely and in accordance with NRC requirements.”

Issuance of this confirmatory order does not preclude the NRC from taking further

enforcement action against the licensee and/or Richard A. Speciale as an individual, upon

completion of the ongoing NRC investigation.

###
### §49d–1. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 16, 1937, ch. 359, title IV, 50 Stat. 302, provided for reapportionment of unexpended appropriations.
Exhibit 10.2

Letter Agreement Dated December 20, 2002
By and Between David C. Reid and
U.S. Gold Corporation

This letter agreement (the "Agreement") is made
between David C. Reid, Vice President  (the
"Option Holder") and .S. Gold Corporation (the
"Corporation").

WHEREAS, effective August 20, 2002, Option Holder
was granted an Incentive Stock Option Agreement
under the Corporation's 2002 Stock Option and Stock
Grant Plan (the "Plan") covering options to
purchase 750,000 shares of Common Stock of the
Corporation at an exercise price of $0.32/share and
expiring August 20, 2012 (the "SOA"), which SOA
was not able to be exercised until and unless the
Plan as well as the SOA were approved by
shareholders of the Corporation, and

WHEREAS, the shareholders of the Corporation have
not to date approved either the Plan nor the SOA,
and

WHEREAS, the Option Holder has voluntarily agreed
to terminate the SOA effective immediately and for
no consideration, and

WHEREAS, the Corporation accepts the voluntary
officer of the Option Holder and is agreeable to
the termination of the SOA immediately, now

THEREFORE, the Option Holder and the Corporation
agree to the termination effective immediately of
that certain Incentive Stock Option Agreement dated
August 20, 2002 with Option Holder covering an
aggregate of 750,000 shares of Common Stock of the
Corporation at an exercise price of $0.32/share.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have
executed this letter agreement effective as of
December 20, 2002.

Option Holder:

/S/ David C. Reid
David C. Reid


Corporation

/S/ William F. Pass
William F. Pass
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary
### §1911. General Counsel to the Chief of Police and the United States Capitol Police

#### (1) In general

There shall be within the United States Capitol Police the General Counsel to the Chief of Police and the United States Capitol Police (in this subsection referred to as the "General Counsel"), who shall report to and serve at the pleasure of the Chief of the United States Capitol Police.

#### (2) Appointment

The General Counsel shall be appointed by the Chief of the Capitol Police in accordance with section 1907(e)(1) of this title (as amended by section 2(a)(4)),1 after consultation with the Capitol Police Board, without regard to political affiliation and solely on the basis of fitness to perform the duties of the position.

#### (3) Compensation

#### (A) In general

Subject to subparagraph (B), the annual rate of pay for the General Counsel shall be fixed by the Chief of the Capitol Police.

#### (B) Limitation

The annual rate of pay for the General Counsel may not exceed an annual rate equal to $1,000 less than the annual rate of pay in effect for the Chief of the Capitol Police.

#### (4) Omitted

#### (5) No effect on current General Counsel

Nothing in this section or the amendments made by this section may be construed to affect the status of the individual serving as the General Counsel to the Chief of Police and the United States Capitol Police as of March 4, 2010.

(Pub. L. 111–145, §3(a), Mar. 4, 2010, 124 Stat. 51.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 2(a)(4), referred to in par. (2), means section 2(a)(4) of Pub. L. 111–145.

For the amendments made by this section, referred to in par. (5), see Codification note below.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of subsec. (a) of section 3 of Pub. L. 111–145. Subsec. (a)(4) of section 3 of Pub. L. 111–145 repealed section 84–2 of this title, now section 5521 of this title, and provisions set out as a note under section 1901 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### Frank C. Kowalczyk, Respondent, v. South Bay Consolidated Water Company, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

*976No opinion. Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.