alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Dr. Adya S. Tripathi, Chief Executive Officer of Tripath
Technology Inc. (the Company), and Clarke Seniff, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys transition report on Form 10-K/T for the fiscal nine months ended September 30, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Periodic
Report and the results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the Periodic Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 3rd day of February 2005.



|                                                               |  |  |  |                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               |  | 
|/S/    ADYA S.
TRIPATHI                                        |  |  |  | /S/    CLARKE
SENIFF                                            
|Adya S. Tripathi, Ph. D. President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Clarke Seniff Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer



This certification
accompanies the Form 10-K/T to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Tripath Technology Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K/T), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Case 0:20-cv-61648-RAR Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 1 of 4
Case 0:20-cv-61648-RAR Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 2 of 4
Case 0:20-cv-61648-RAR Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 3 of 4
Case 0:20-cv-61648-RAR Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2020 Page 4 of 4
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-99-91

October 27, 1999

NRC TO MEET WITH HOLY REDEEMER HOSPITAL OFFICIALS

TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

officials of Holy Redeemer Hospital and Medical Center on

Thursday, October 28, to discuss an apparent violation of NRC

requirements that contributed to a misadministration earlier this

year.

The predecisional enforcement conference will begin at 9:30

a.m., in the NRC’s Region I Office, 475 Allendale Road in King of

Prussia. The meeting is open to the public for observation.

NRC inspectors conducted an inspection at the Meadowbrook,

Pa., facility on September 17 to review a medical

misadministration. The inspectors found that, on September 14, a

patient was administered an unintended dose of 5 millicuries of

iodine-131 in preparation for a total neck and body scan, rather

than an intended 300 microcuries of iodine-123 as part of an

evaluation for hyperthyroidism. The technologist discovered that

the misadministration had occurred on September 15.

Based on that inspection the NRC determined there was one

apparent violation of NRC requirements: failing to provide

adequate supervision to assure that a technician followed the

licensee’s written quality management procedures led to the

misadministration.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference

does not mean that the NRC has determined a violation has

occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the

purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and

safety significance; to provide the licensee with an opportunity

to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC

inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline its

proposed corrective action.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this

conference. That decision will be made by NRC officials at a

later time.

#
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2003, of Synagro Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ross M.
Patten, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company and that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


                                               /s/ Ross M. Patten
                                               ------------------
                                               Ross M. Patten
                                               August 13, 2003
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93018, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 134.32 General exceptions to marking requirements. The articles described or meeting the specified conditions set forth below are excepted from marking requirements (see subpart C of this part for marking of the containers): ( a ) Articles that are incapable of being marked;
( b ) Articles that cannot be marked prior to shipment to the United States without injury;
( c ) Articles that cannot be marked prior to shipment to the United States except at an expense economically prohibitive of its importation;
( d ) Articles for which the marking of the containers will reasonably indicate the origin of the articles;
( e ) Articles which are crude substances;
( f ) Articles imported for use by the importer and not intended for sale in their imported or any other form;
( g ) Articles to be processed in the United States by the importer or for his account otherwise than for the purpose of concealing the origin of such articles and in such manner that any mark contemplated by this part would necessarily be obliterated, destroyed, or permanently concealed;
( h ) Articles for which the ultimate purchaser must necessarily know, or in the case of a good of a NAFTA or USMCA country, must reasonably know, the country of origin by reason of the circumstances of their importation or by reason of the character of the articles even though they are not marked to indicate their origin;
( i ) Articles which were produced more than 20 years prior to their importation into the United States;
( j ) Articles entered or withdrawn from warehouse for immediate exportation or for transportation and exportation;
( k ) Products of American fisheries which are free of duty;
( l ) Products of possessions of the United States;
( m ) Products of the United States exported and returned;
( n ) Articles exempt from duty under §§ 10.151 through 10.153, § 145.31 or § 145.32 of this chapter;
( o ) Articles which cannot be marked after importation except at an expense that would be economically prohibitive unless the importer, producer, seller, or shipper failed to mark the articles before importation to avoid meeting the requirements of the law;
( p ) Goods of a NAFTA or USMCA country which are original works of art; and
( q ) Goods of a NAFTA or USMCA country which are provided for in subheading 6904.10 or heading 8541 or 8542 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) (19 U.S.C. 1202).
[T.D. 72-262, 37 FR 20318, Sept. 29, 1972, as amended by T.D. 73-135, 38 FR 13369, May 21, 1973; T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17447, July 2, 1973; T.D. 94-1, 58 FR 69471, Dec. 30, 1993; T.D. 94-4, 59 FR 140, Jan. 3, 1994; T.D. 96-48, 61 FR 28980, June 6, 1996; CBP Dec. 21-10, 86 FR 35582, July 6, 2021]
Issue Date: 11/03/00 - 1 - 00-023

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL IIPB

Change Notice 00-023

DELETED: TRANSMITTED:

Number Date Number Date

1. IP 87103 06/11/00 IP 87103 11/03/00

TRAINING: No special training requirements have been identified for any documents issued

with this change notice.

REMARKS: IP 87103 (Inspection of Material Licensees Involved in an Incident of Bankruptcy

Filing) is revised to:

• Clarify responsibilities, guidance and nomenclature

• Incorporate changes due to additions, deletions

• Make minor changes in context

DISTRIBUTION: Standard

END
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 29, 2019

t0722

Order 

Clerk

July 29, 2019

158503

JUDY SANDERSON, ALBERT MORRIS,

ANTONYAL LOUIS, and MADELINE

BROWNE,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 158503

COA: 338983 

Ct of Claims: 16-000083-MM

UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE AGENCY,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 23, 2018 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 122.175 Exemption from penalties.

Should a controlled substance be introduced into the United States or discovered aboard an aircraft owned or operated by a participating carrier, or in cargo carried by a participating carrier, on a route identified by the carrier as one participating in the ACSPP and which has been approved by Customs, the participating air carrier shall be considered to have met the test of highest degree of care and diligence required under law, and shall not be subject to the penalty or seizure provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, if the carrier establishes at an oral presentation before the port director or his designee, that the carrier was not grossly negligent nor engaged in willful misconduct, and that it had complied with all the provisions of these regulations.
#### Francis J. Mulligan, as Administrator of the Estate of Thomas P. Dines, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*City of New York, Appellant.

First Department,

December 12, 1947.

*Fred Iscol*of counsel *(Seymour B. Quel*with him on the brief; *Charles E. Murphy, Corporation Counsel,*attorney), for appellant.

*Herbert A. Kaiden*of counsel *(Richard M. Cantor,*attorney), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff, the public administrator, sues the defendant city on two causes of action, one for the wrongful death of one Dines, the other for conscious pain and suffering of Dines before his death, resulting from a fire and collapse of a building allegedly attributable to defendant’s negligence. The required notice of claim under section 50-e of the General Municipal Law was not given within sixty days after the happening of the accident or within sixty days after the appointment of plaintiff as administrator of the estate of Dines, but was given pursuant to leave granted by Special Term upon the application of plaintiff made approximately four months after his appointment.

*153The only exceptions in the statute to the strict requirement of giving notice within the statutory period are where the claimant is an infant or is mentally or physically incapacitated, and by reason of such disability fails to serve a notice of claim as required, or where a person entitled to make a claim dies before the expiration of the time limited for service of the notice, in which events the court in its discretion may grant leave to serve the notice within a reasonable time after the expiration of the time specified. (§ 50-e, subd. 5.) It is apparent that the death claim does not fall within any of the exceptions. It is not a claim which decedent was entitled to make, hut is a claim arising upon his death and accruing in the first instance to the administrator. It is not permissible under the statute, therefore, to extend the time within which an administrator may give notice of a death claim.

The cause of action for conscious pain and suffering falls within the exception of a person being entitled to make a claim dying before the expiration of the time limited for service of the notice. There appears in this case, however, no reason why a longer period should be allowed for asserting that claim than for asserting the death claim.

The order appealed from should he reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant and the motion denied.

Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ„, concur; Shientag, J., concurs in the result.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant and the motion denied. Settle order on notice.
§ 177.23 Who may request a country-of-origin advisory ruling or final determination. A country-of-origin advisory ruling or final determination may be requested by: ( a ) A foreign manufacturer, producer, or exporter, or a United States importer of merchandise,
( b ) A manufacturer, producer, or wholesaler in the United States of a like product,
( c ) United States members of a labor organization or other association of workers whose members are employed in the manufacture, production, or wholesale in the United States of a like product, or
( d ) A trade or business association a majority of whose members manufacture, produce, or wholesale a like product in the United States.
Exhibit
32(b)





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, OF THE


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Rocky Brands, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
E. McDonald, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      James E. McDonaldJames
      E. McDonald, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
      OfficerJuly
      31, 2009
#### § 191.164 Return to Customs custody.

There is no time limit for the return to Customs custody of distilled spirits, wine, or beer subject to refund of taxes under the provisions of this subpart.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-027 April 2, 2002

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

 Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC TO MEET WITH ENTERGY TO DISCUSS

FITZPATRICK PLANT PERFORMANCE

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Entergy Nuclear

Northeast on Tuesday, April 9, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual assessment of safety

performance at the James A. FitzPatrick nuclear power plant. The facility is located in Scriba, N.Y.,

and operated by Entergy.

The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 2 p.m.

at the Joint New Center for the plant. The center is located at the Oswego County Airport, 40 Airport

Drive, Fulton, N.Y. Before the session is adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions

from the public on the safety performance of the plant, as well as the role of the NRC in ensuring safe

plant operation.

The performance period to be discussed is April 1, 2001, to December 31, 2001. In addition,

NRC staff will provide an overview of the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process.

A letter sent from the NRC Region I office to Entergy addresses the performance of the plant

during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the NRC

web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/fitz_2001q4.pdf

Current performance information for the FitzPatrick plant is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/FITZ/fitz_chart.html

###
### §298. Reductions in compensation level

Each employee in a position of a compensation level of the House Employees Schedule (HS) or the House Wage Schedule (HWS), whose employment in such position and level is terminated and who is reemployed, with or without break in service, in a position in a lower compensation level (HS level or HWS level) of such schedule, or whose position is placed in a lower compensation level of such schedule pursuant to a reclassification of such position, shall be placed by the committee in such step of such lower compensation level as the committee deems appropriate.

(Pub. L. 88–652, §9, Oct. 13, 1964, 78 Stat. 1083.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1965, see section 17 of Pub. L. 88–652, set out as a note under section 291 of this title.
Exhibit 13.1



TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned, Mark Liu, President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (the Company), hereby certifies, to
his knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  April 14, 2014



By:

/s/ Mark LiuName:

Mark LiuTitle:

President and Co-Chief Executive Officer




The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis Panel, R21 Review.                    

*Date:*                         March 17, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Library of Medicine, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Hua-Chuan Sim, MD, Health Science Administrator, National Library of Medicine, Extramural Programs, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 28, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-2380  Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.2028 Issuance of negative origin determinations. If, as a result of an origin verification initiated under this subpart, CBP determines that a claim for preferential tariff treatment under this subpart should be denied, it will issue a determination in writing or via an authorized electronic data interchange system to the importer that sets forth the following: ( a ) A description of the good that was the subject of the verification together with the identifying numbers and dates of the import documents pertaining to the good;
( b ) A statement setting forth the findings of fact made in connection with the verification and upon which the determination is based; and
( c ) With specific reference to the rules applicable to originating goods as set forth in General Note 35, HTSUS, and in §§ 10.2013 through 10.2025, the legal basis for the determination.
#### In the Matter of the Proposed Incorporation of the Village of South Dayton, in the Town of Dayton, Cattaraugus County, New York.

Appeal dismissed unless appellant file and serve printed papers on appeal by May 4, briefs by May 11, and stipulate to argue appeal on May 18, 1915.
#### Pickwick-Lilliput, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. Ilene H. Levy et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendants to answer within ten days after service of the order, with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.