UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OFFLORIDA 

Case No. 20-cv-23223-BLOOM/Louis

DRAGAN JANICIJEVIC, on his own 

behalf and on behalf of all other 

similarly situated crew members 

working aboard BAHAMAS 

PARADISE CRUISE LINE

vessels

Plaintiff,

v.

CLASSICA CRUISE OPERATOR,

LTD. and PARADISE CRUISE LINE 

OPERATOR LTD.

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING RENEWED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS FOR 

SETTLEMENT PURPOSES, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF CLASS NOTICE, AND 

SCHEDULING A FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Preliminary 

Approval of Class Action Settlement and Certification of Settlement Class, ECF No. [37] 

(“Motion”). Upon review and consideration of the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action 

Settlement of Settling Plaintiff

1 Dragan Janicijevic, on behalf of himself and all Settlement Class 

Members, and Defendants Classica Cruise Operator Ltd. and Paradise Cruise Line Operator Ltd. 

(collectively, “Defendants”), including the Parties’ Amended Stipulation and Settlement Agreement 

dated December 17, 2020 and all exhibits thereto, and the Court being fully advised, it is ORDERED 

AND ADJUDGED that the Motion, ECF No. [37], is GRANTED as follows:

1 Unless otherwise indicated, capitalized terms used throughout this Order shall have the meanings ascribed 

to them in the Settlement Agreement, ECF No. [37-4].

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2021 Page 1 of 14
Case No. 20-cv-23223-BLOOM/Louis

2

1. Settlement. Settling Plaintiff and Defendants have negotiated a proposed settlement 

of Settling Plaintiff’s claims in this action, individually and on behalf of a class of seafareremployees, described below as the Settlement Class, to avoid the expense, uncertainties, and burden 

of protracted litigation, and to resolve the Released Claims against Defendants and any and all of 

their present or former predecessors, successors, subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, joint ventures, and

entities in which the Cruise Defendants have a controlling interest, and any and all of their officers, 

directors, partners, members, principals, insurers, insureds, employees, shareholders, attorneys, 

servants, assigns, representatives and agents (specifically limited tothose representatives and agents 

involved with or related to the alleged conduct in this action).

2. Review. The Court has carefully reviewed the Settlement Agreement, as well as the

files, records, and proceedings to date in this matter. The terms and conditions in the Settlement 

Agreement are incorporated herein as though fully set forth in this Order.

3. Preliminary Approval. The Settlement Agreement entered into by and among the 

Settling Plaintiff and Defendants was negotiated at arm’s length and is approved on a preliminary 

basis as fair, reasonable, and adequate and within the range of possible approval. The Court finds 

that providing notice to the Settlement Class Members is justified by the showing that the Court 

likely will be able to approve the proposed Settlement under Rule 23(e)(2).

4. Settlement Class Relief. The proposed Claim Settlement Relief to Settlement Class 

Members, as identified in Section 4 of the Settlement Agreement, is approved on a preliminary basis 

as fair, reasonable, and adequate. The Settlement Class shall consist of:

All seafarer-employees who were physically present on the Grand Celebration for at 

least one day anytime between March 18, 2020 until August 20, 2020 and were (1)

terminated such that severance is due under their employment contracts and/or (2)

were employed and performed a designated job at Defendants’ request. “Seafareremployees” shall not include deck and engine employees and independent

contractors, Cruise Defendants’ corporate officers or corporate directors.

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2021 Page 2 of 14
Case No. 20-cv-23223-BLOOM/Louis

3

5. Preliminary Certification of Settlement Class. The Court makes the following 

determinations as to certification of the Settlement Class:

(a) The Court preliminarily certifies the Settlement Class for purposes of 

settlement only, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) and (b)(3).

(b) The Settlement Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is 

impracticable. “[G]enerally, where the potential number of plaintiffs is likely to exceed forty 

members, the Rule 23(a) numerosity requirement will be met.” Williams v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,

280 F.R.D. 665, 671-72 (S.D. Fla. 2012); see, e.g., Anderson v. Bank of S., N.A., 118 F.R.D. 136, 145 

(M.D. Fla. 1987) (“[T]he size of the class and geographic location of the would-be class members

are relevant to any consideration of practicality.”). As alleged, there are hundreds of Settlement Class

Members. Specifically, there are 276 Class Members who were terminated and are entitled to 

severance, and there are 6 Class Members who continued to perform some work for Defendants 

during the class period. See ECF No. [37] at 4. 

(c) There are questions of law or fact common to the members of the Settlement 

Class. The Settlement Class Members’ claims raise common issues as to whether Defendants’ 

conduct breached the contracts Defendants had with Settlement Class Members.

(d) The claims of the Plaintiff are typical of the claims of the other members of 

the Settlement Class. Typicality and commonality are related, with commonality referring to “the 

group characteristics of the class as a whole” and typicality focusing on the named plaintiff’s claims

in relation to the class. In re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litig., 220 F.R.D. 672 (S.D. Fla. 

2004). Plaintiff’s claims in this case arise from the same alleged course of conduct and are based on 

the same legal theories as those brought on behalf of the proposed class. Therefore, the typicality 

prong is met.

(e) Plaintiff is capable of fairly and adequately protecting the interests of the 

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2021 Page 3 of 14
Case No. 20-cv-23223-BLOOM/Louis

4

members of the Settlement Class, in connection with the Settlement Agreement. Plaintiff has no 

interests antagonistic to those of the class and plaintiff’s counsel is qualified, experienced and 

generally able to conduct the proposed litigation.

(f) Common questions of law and fact predominate over questions affecting only 

individual members of the Settlement Class. Settlement Class Members’ claims arise out of 

Defendants’ alleged uniform conduct and seek remedy of “common legal grievances” as a result of 

the conduct in question.

(g) The Settlement Class is ascertainable. Defendants have identified each of the 

Settlement Class Members.

(h) Resolution of the claims in this Litigation by way of a worldwide settlement is 

superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient resolution of the claims of the Settlement

Class. Individual lawsuits by aggrieved class seafarer-employees would involve largely the same 

evidence, and waste judicial resources.

(i) The Court expressly reserves its prerogative to revisit class certification 

pending further developments in this litigation.

6. Designation of Class Representative. Settling Plaintiff Dragan Janicijevic is 

designated asthe representative of the SettlementClassfor the sole purpose ofseeking a settlement of 

the claims against Defendants in the Litigation.

7. Designation of Class Counsel. The law firms of Lipcon, Margulies, Alsina & 

Winkleman, P.A. and The Moskowitz Law Firm, PLLC are hereby designated as Class Counsel for 

the Settlement Class for the sole purpose of the Settlement.

8. Final Approval Hearing. A hearing regarding final approval of the Settlement 

(“Final Approval Hearing”) will be held at 9:00 a.m. on May 12, 2021, via Zoom video 

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2021 Page 4 of 14
Case No. 20-cv-23223-BLOOM/Louis

5

conference2 before the Honorable Beth Bloom, to determine, among other things: (i) whether the

classwide Settlement of Settling Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants in the Litigation should be 

approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate; (ii) whether the Settling Plaintiff’s claims against

Defendants should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement; 

(iii) whether Settlement Class Members should be bound by the Releases set forth in the Settlement

Agreement; (iv) whether Settlement Class Members should be subject to a permanent injunction

which, among other things, bars Settling Plaintiff and all Settlement Class Members and any person 

actually or purportedly acting on their behalf, from filing, commencing, prosecuting, maintaining,

intervening in, participating in (as parties, class members or otherwise), and from organizing or 

soliciting the participation of other Settlement Class Members in a separate class for purposes of 

pursuing any action (including by seeking to amend a pending complaint to include class allegations,

or seeking class certification in a pending action) in any jurisdiction based on or relating to any of 

the Released Claims or the facts and circumstances relating thereto; and (v) whether the application 

of Class Counsel for an award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses, and proposed Case Contribution 

Award to Settling Plaintiff, should be approved.

9. Class Notice.

(a) The Court approves the Class Notice as described in the Settlement 

Agreement, including the Mail Notice attached as Exhibit 2 to the Settlement Agreement and the 

manner of providing Mail Notice to Noticed Class Members described in Section 7 of the Settlement

Agreement. The Court finds that Class Notice as described in the Settlement Agreement is the best

practicable notice under the circumstances and is reasonably calculated, under all the 

2 The Meeting ID to access the Zoom videoconference is 161 325 2996 and the password is 195683. 

Alternatively, the hyperlink to the meeting is

https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1613252996?pwd=STNhdlhYV0tQVW5OTlJSYWRMMXJHdz09.

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2021 Page 5 of 14
Case No. 20-cv-23223-BLOOM/Louis

6

circumstances, to apprise Noticed Class Members of the pendency of this Litigation, the terms of 

the Settlement Agreement, and their right to object to the Settlement or to exclude themselves from 

the Settlement Class. The Court further finds that Mail Notice, Publication Notice, the Settlement 

Website, and the other forms of Class Notice described in the Settlement Agreement are reasonable, 

constitute due, adequate, and sufficient notice to all persons entitled to receive notice, and meet the 

requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 and due process.

(b) The Mail Notice, in the form and content of Exhibit 2 to the Settlement 

Agreement, shall be mailed by the Settlement Administrator not more than thirty (30) Days after this 

Order, in the manner described in the Settlement Agreement. The Claim Form Instructions and 

Claim Form (also part of Exhibit 2), shall be included with the Notice, shall be included with the 

Mail Notice.

(c) No later than the posting of the Mail Notice, the Settlement Administrator 

shall establish a Settlement Website that shall contain copies of the Settlement Agreement and 

Exhibits, the Preliminary Approval Order, the Mail Notice, Claim Form Instructions, Claim Form, 

and such other documents as Class Counsel and Defendants’ Counsel agree upon. The Claim Form 

Instructions and Claim Form shall be available to download or print from the Settlement Website. In 

addition, the Settlement Website shall provide an email address to allow the submission of Claim

Forms and via email. The Settlement Website shall have a Uniform Resource Locator which identifies 

the Settlement Website as www. .com. The Settlement Website shall remain open and 

accessible through the last day for Settlement Class Members to submit a Claim for Settlement 

Relief. The Settlement Website shall not include any advertising and shall not bear or include any 

logos or trademarks of any of the Defendants.

(d) The Notice and Claim form shall also provide a toll-free phone number, so 

that Settlement Class Members may call and revise answers to any questions they may have.

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2021 Page 6 of 14
Case No. 20-cv-23223-BLOOM/Louis

7

(e) Settlement Class Members will be provided an opportunity to submit Claim 

Forms in the form attached to the Agreement as Exhibit 2, requesting Claim Settlement Relief in 

accordance with the terms of the Agreement. To be considered valid and timely, a Claim Form must 

be completed and signed by the Settlement Class Member and must be (i) if in paper form, mailed 

to the address of the Settlement Administrator as specified in the Claim Form and postmarked by

the Claim Deadline, or (ii) if submitted electronically, be completed and submitted by midnight ET 

on the Claim Deadline. The Claimant must also attest and affirm all of the information provided in

his or her Claim under the following declaration: “I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws 

of the United States of America that the information provided by me on this Claim Form is true and 

correct.” Submitted Claim Forms shall be reviewed and handled by the Settlement Administrator in 

accordance with the Settlement Agreement.

(f) Not less than ten (10) Days prior to the Final Approval Hearing, Class 

Counsel shall file a declaration or affidavit from the Settlement Administrator with the Court 

regarding proof of mailing of the Mail Notice, establishing of the Settlement Website, and 

identifying the Noticed Class Members who timely submitted Requests for Exclusion.

(g) Class Counsel and Defendants’ Counsel as jointly agreed, along with the 

Settlement Administrator, are authorized to complete any missing information and to make any nonsubstantive revisions to the Claim Form, Claim Form Instructions, Mail Notice, and Publication 

Notice that do not materially reduce the rights of Noticed Class Members prior to disseminating 

them as necessary to fulfill the purposes of the Settlement. The font size, layout, and other 

presentation elements of the Claim Form, Claim Form Instructions, Mail Notice, and Publication

Notice may be adjusted to accommodate printing, mailing and publication considerations.

(h) Defendants shall comply with the notice obligations under the Class Action 

Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1715, in connection with the proposed Settlement.

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2021 Page 7 of 14
Case No. 20-cv-23223-BLOOM/Louis

8

10. Settlement Administrator. Given the size of the Class, the Court approves the 

Defendants and Class Counsel to jointly administer the settlement and implement the terms of the 

Settlement Agreement, and authorizes and directs Defendants and Class Counsel to (a) print and 

mail the Mail Notice, Claim Form, and Claim Form Instructions, (b) establish phone number for 

Settlement Class Member calls, (c) establish the Settlement Website, (e) receive and process Claim 

Forms, and (f) carry outsuch other responsibilities as are provided for in the Settlement Agreement or 

as may be agreed to by Class Counsel and Defendants, all pursuant to and as provided in the 

Settlement Agreement.

11. Exclusion from the Settlement Class. Any Noticed Class Member who wishes to 

be excluded from the Settlement Class must send a written Request for Exclusion to the Settlement 

Administrator by first-class mail, postage prepaid, to the address provided in the Mail Notice and 

Settlement Website. Any such Request for Exclusion must be postmarked by April 12, 2021 (“OptOut Deadline”), which is no less than thirty (30) Days before the Final Approval Hearing.

(a) To be valid, the Request for Exclusion must clearly indicate the name, 

address, telephone number, and passport number of the Person seeking exclusion, the name and case 

number of the Action, a clear and unequivocal statement under penalty of perjury that the person 

seeking exclusion believes he or she is a member of the settlement class and a statement with enough

factual information to demonstrate that the Person is eligible to be a Settlement Class member, a

statement that the Person wishes to be excluded from the Settlement Class, and the date and signature 

of such Person or, in the case of a Person in the Settlement Class who is deceased or incapacitated, 

the signature of the legally authorized representative of such Person.

(b) A Noticed Class Member who desires to opt out must take timely affirmative

written action pursuant to this Order and the Settlement Agreement, even ifthe Noticed Class Member 

desiring to opt out of the Settlement Class (i) files or has filed a separate action against any of the 

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2021 Page 8 of 14
Case No. 20-cv-23223-BLOOM/Louis

9

Released Persons, or (ii) is, or becomes, a putative class member in any other class action filed 

against any of the Defendants.

(c) Except for those Noticed Class Members who timely and properly file a 

Request for Exclusion, all other Noticed Class Members will be deemed to be Settlement Class 

Members for all purposes under the Settlement Agreement, and upon the Effective Date, will be 

bound by its terms, including, but not limited to, the Releases in the Settlement Agreement and a 

Judgment approving the Settlement.

(d) If the proposed Settlement is finally approved, any Noticed Class Member 

who has not submitted a timely, written Request for Exclusion from the Settlement Class shall be 

bound by the Judgment and all subsequent proceedings, orders, and judgments in this Litigation and 

all provisions of the Settlement Agreement, including, but not limited to, the Releases provided in 

the Settlement Agreement, even if he or she has pending, or subsequently initiates, litigation against 

Defendants, or any Released Persons relating to any of the Released Claims as defined in the 

Settlement Agreement.

12. Objections and Appearances. Any Noticed Class Member who has not filed a 

timely written Request for Exclusion and who complies with the requirements of this Order and 

the Settlement Agreement may object to any aspect of the proposed Settlement either on his or her 

own or through an attorney hired at his or her expense. Any Settlement ClassMember who wishes 

to object to the Settlement Agreement must do so in writing and must file with the Clerk of Court 

and mail copies to Class Counsel and Defendants’ Counsel, at the addresses listed below, a written 

statement of objection in accordance with the requirements set forth below and in the Settlement 

Agreement, by April 12, 2021 (the “Objection Deadline”), which is no less than thirty (30) Days 

before the Final Approval Hearing.

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2021 Page 9 of 14
Case No. 20-cv-23223-BLOOM/Louis

10

For Settling Plaintiff and Settlement Class

Michael A. Winkleman

Lipcon, Margulies, Alsina & Winkleman, P.A.

One Biscayne Tower, Suite 1776 

2 South Biscayne Boulevard 

Miami, Florida 33131

Defendants’ Counsel:

Catherine J. MacIvor

Foreman Friedman, PA

One Biscayne Tower, Suite 2300 

2 South Biscayne Boulevard 

Miami, Florida 33131

(a) The requirements to assert a valid written objection shall be set forth in the 

Mail Notice and on the Settlement Website, and shall include: (i) the case name and number; (ii) the 

name, address, and telephone number of the Settlement Class Member objecting and, if represented 

by counsel, the name, address, and telephone number of his/her counsel; (iii) the basis for the 

objection; and (iv) a statement of whether he/she intends to appear at the Final Approval Hearing, 

either with or without counsel.

(b) Any Settlement Class Member who fails to object to the Settlement in the 

manner described in the Mail Notice and consistent with this Order shall be deemed to have waived 

any such objection, shall not be permitted to object to any terms or approval of the Settlement at the 

Final Approval Hearing, and shall be foreclosed from seeking any review of the Settlement or the 

terms of the Settlement Agreement by appeal or other means.

(c) Subject to approval of the Court, any Settlement Class Member who submits 

a timely written objection may appear, in person or by counsel, at the Final Approval Hearing held 

by the Court, to show cause why the proposed Settlement Agreement should not be approved as fair, 

adequate, and reasonable, provided that the objecting Settlement Class Member: (i) files with the 

Clerk of the Court by the Objection Deadline a notice of intention to appear at the Final Approval 

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2021 Page 10 of 14
Case No. 20-cv-23223-BLOOM/Louis

11

Hearing (“Notice of Intention to Appear”), which must include the case name and number and the 

Settlement Class Member’s name, address, telephone number, and signature; and (ii) serves copies 

of the Notice of Intention to Appear on all counsel designated in this Order by the Objection 

Deadline. The Notice of Intention to Appear must include copies of any papers, exhibits, or other 

evidence that the objecting Settlement Class Member will present to the Court in connection with

the Final Approval Hearing. Any attorney who intends to represent an objecting Settlement Class 

Member at the Final Approval Hearing must do so at the Settlement Class Member’s expense and 

must file a notice of appearance at least thirty (30) Days before the Final Approval Hearing. Any 

Settlement Class Member who does not file a Notice of Intention to Appear in accordance with the 

deadlines and other requirements of this Order and the Settlement Agreement will not be entitled to 

appear at the Final Approval Hearing to raise any objections.

13. Releases. If the Settlement is finally approved, all Noticed Class Members who have 

not filed a timely and proper Request for Exclusion shall release the Released Persons from all 

Released Claims, as more fully described in Section 15 of the Settlement Agreement. 

14. Attorneys’ Fees, Expenses and Case Contribution Award. Settling Plaintiff and 

Class Counsel agree not to seek an award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses in the Litigation in a total

amount that exceeds $262,500.00 (30% of the Gross Claim Fund). Class Counsel and Settling 

Plaintiff agree not to seek a Case Contribution Award that exceeds $5,000.00 for Settling Plaintiff 

for his work and assistance in this Litigation. Following execution of the Settlement, a panel of the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued an opinion holding that case contribution 

awards for class representatives were impermissible. Johnson v. NPAS Solutions, LLC, 975 F.3d 1244

(11th Cir. 2020). In light ofthis opinion, theCourt preliminarily approvesthe incentive award for purposes 

of the issuance of the Class Notice but at final approval will consider whether to deny the request without 

prejudice and reserve jurisdiction to reconsider the issue of a case contribution award if NPAS is reversed, 

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2021 Page 11 of 14
Case No. 20-cv-23223-BLOOM/Louis

12

vacated, or overruled. Defendants agree not to oppose applications for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses 

and Case Contribution Award that do not exceed the foregoing amounts.

15. Preliminary Injunction. In order to protect the continuing jurisdiction of the 

Court and to effectuate this Order, the Agreement and the Settlement, all Noticed Class Members

who do not timely exclude themselvesfrom the Settlement Class, and anyone acting or purporting

to act on their behalf, are hereby preliminarily enjoined from directly or indirectly (a) filing, 

commencing, prosecuting, intervening in, maintaining (including claims or actions already filed), or 

participating in (as parties, class members, or otherwise) any new or existing action or proceeding

before any court or tribunal in any jurisdiction regarding any Released Claims against any Released 

Parties; or (b) organizing any Settlement Class Members into a separate class for purposes of 

pursuing as a purported class action any lawsuit (including by seeking to amend a pending 

complaint to include class allegations, or seeking class certification in a new or pending action) 

based on or relating to the claims and causes of action, or the facts and circumstances relating 

thereto, in this Litigation and/or the Released Claims.

16. Service of Papers. Class Counsel and Defendants’ Counsel and shall serve on each

other and on all other parties who have filed notices of appearance, at or before the Final Approval 

Hearing, any further documents in support of the proposed Settlement, including responses to any 

papers filed by Settlement Class Members. Class Counsel and Defendants’ Counsel shall promptly 

furnish to each other any and all objections or written Requests for Exclusion that may come into 

their possession and shall file such objections with the Court on or before the Final Approval 

Hearing, unless such documents already appear on the Court’s docket.

17. Termination of Settlement. This Order shall become null and void, and shall be 

without prejudice to the rights of the Parties, all of whom shall be restored to their respective 

positions existing as of August 20, 2020, if: (a) the proposed Settlement is not finally approved by 

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2021 Page 12 of 14
Case No. 20-cv-23223-BLOOM/Louis

13

the Court, or the Judgment is not entered or does not become Final, or the Effective Date does not 

occur; or (b) the Settlement Agreement is terminated pursuant to the terms of the Settlement 

Agreement for any reason. In such event, and except as provided therein, the proposed Settlement 

and Settlement Agreement shall become null and void and be of no further force and effect; the 

preliminary certification of the Settlement Class for settlement purposes shall be automatically

vacated; all communications and documents related to the Settlement will be subject to Federal Rule 

of Evidence 408 and all other applicable settlement, negotiation and mediation privileges; this Order

or other judgment or order entered by the Court in accordance with the terms of the Settlement 

Agreement will be treated as vacated, nunc pro tunc; the Settlement Agreement and the Court’s 

Orders, including this Order, shall not be used or referred to for any purpose whatsoever; and the 

Parties shall retain, without prejudice, any and all objections, arguments, and defenses with respect 

to class certification.

18. Use of Order Following Termination of Settlement. This Order shall be of no force

and effect if the Settlement does not become Final and shall not be construed or used as an 

admission, concession, or declaration by or against Defendants of, or as evidence of, any fault, 

wrongdoing, breach, or liability, or by or against Settling Plaintiff or Noticed Class Membersthat 

their claims lack merit or that the relief requested in this Litigation is inappropriate, improper, or 

unavailable, or as a waiver by any party of any defenses they may have.

19. Stay. All proceedings in the Litigation as to the claims of Settling Plaintiff against 

Defendants are stayed, including Defendants’ obligation to file an answer or other response to the 

Second Amended Complaint, except as necessary to effectuate the terms of the Settlement.

20. Necessary Steps. The Court authorizes and directs the Parties to take all other 

necessary and appropriate steps to implement the Settlement as set forth in the Settlement 

Agreement.

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2021 Page 13 of 14
Case No. 20-cv-23223-BLOOM/Louis

14

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on January 7, 2021.

_________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: 

Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/07/2021 Page 14 of 14