alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 333.60 General provisions. ( a ) Compliance actions may be taken for any reason necessary or appropriate to the enforcement or the administration of the Defense Production Act and related statutes, this part, or an official action. Compliance actions include audits, investigations, or other inquiries and FEMA may utilize other official actions, such as administrative subpoenas, demands for information, and inspection authorizations as part of the compliance actions under this part.
( b ) Any person who places or receives a rated order or an allocation order must comply with the provisions of this part.
( c ) Willful violation of any of the provisions of Title I or section 705 of the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes, this part, or an official action of FEMA, is a criminal act, punishable as provided in the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes, and as set forth in § 333.64 of this part.
### §2003. Speaker as member of House Office Building commission

The Speaker shall continue a member of the commission in control of said building until his successor as Speaker is elected or his term as a Representative in Congress shall have expired.

(Mar. 4, 1911, ch. 240, 36 Stat. 1306.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 176 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

Section is based on act Mar. 4, 1911, popularly known as the "Deficiency Appropriation Act, fiscal year 1911".
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. III-00-48 September 20, 2000

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE SET FOR SEPT. 28

ON POSSIBLE VIOLATIONS AT MALLINCKRODT, INC.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet September 28 in Lisle, Illinois, with

representatives of Mallinckrodt, Inc., for a predecisional enforcement conference to discuss possible

safety violations associated with multiple radiation overexposures to workers’ fingers at the company’s

facility in Maryland Heights, Missouri.

The meeting will be at 9 a.m. in the Third Floor Conference Room, NRC Region III Office, 801

Warrenville Road, in Lisle. The meeting is open to public observation. Members of the NRC staff

will be available following the meeting for questions from the public.

Mallinckrodt produces radioactive drugs for research and for medical diagnosis and therapy.

The possible violations were identified in an NRC inspection in July and August as a followup

to an earlier review by an NRC Augmented Inspection Team. The company had reported a possible

radiation overexposure to a worker's fingers on April 13 and subsequently identified other work areas

at its plant where workers might have received radiation exposures to their fingers above NRC limits.

The possible violations include radiation exposures to workers’ fingertips in excess of the NRC

limit of 50 rems per year and the failure of the company to thoroughly evaluate work procedures to

keep radiation exposures within regulatory limits.

The Augmented Inspection Team report and the followup inspection report are available on the

NRC’s web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports/ait.htm

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that a

determination has been made that violations have occurred or that enforcement action will be taken.

The purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and safety significance, to provide the

licensee with an opportunity to point out errors that may have been made in NRC inspection reports,

and to enable the company to outline its proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action, such as a civil

penalty, will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a later time.

###
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23



                        Consent of KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP



The Board of Directors
Midas, Inc.;

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
333-44625 and 333-44797 on Forms S-8 of Midas, Inc. of our report dated January
30, 1998, relating to the combined balance sheets of Midas as of December, 1997
and 1996 and the related combined statements of operations and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December, 1997, which report
appears in this annual report on Form 10-K.


                                       /S/KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 19, 1998
Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free.

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

October 12, 2010

Mr. Ali Mirzakhalili, Program Administrator

Air Quality Management Section

Division of Air and Waste Management

Delaware Department of Natural Resources

 And Environmental Control

156 South State Street

Dover, Delaware 19901

Dear Mr. Mirzakhalili:

On April 16, 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to 

the Delaware State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Department of Natural Resources and 

Environmental Control. This SIP revision amends 7 DE Administrative Code 1124—Control of 

Volatile Organic Compounds, Sections 2.0-Definitions; 12.0-Surface Coating of Plastic Parts; 19-

0- Coating of Metal Furniture, 20.0-Coating of Large Appliances, and 22.0-Coating of 

Miscellaneous Metal Parts. The purpose of these amendments is to conform to new Control 

Technique Guidelines (CTG) documents issued by EPA. EPA has determined that the submittal is 

administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking (NPR).

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Ellen Wentworth, 

Air Quality Planning Branch at (215) 814-2034. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

Sincerely,

Diana Esher, Director

Air Protection Division 

cc: Collin P. O’Mara, Secretary, DNREC

 Ron Amirikian, DNREC
§ 158.44 Disposition of abandoned merchandise. ( a ) *General conditions.* The disposition of merchandise abandoned to the Government pursuant to § 158.42 or § 158.43, and not retained for official use, shall be governed by the regulations of the General Services Administration applicable to the United States Customs Service.
( b ) *Sale of merchandise.* If the merchandise is cleared for sale, it shall be sold in accordance with the applicable provisions of part 127 of this chapter, unless it is worthless or it appears probable that the expenses of sale will exceed the proceeds. If the merchandise is sold, no part of the proceeds shall be returned to the importer.
( c ) *Disposition of worthless merchandise.* If the merchandise or any part thereof is worthless or it appears probable that the expenses of its sale will exceed the proceeds, it shall be destroyed or otherwise disposed of as the port director shall specify. The port director shall insure that such merchandise is destroyed or removed from the control of the importer to avoid the possibility of any part of the same merchandise being made the subject of another application.
(Secs. 506(1), 563(b), 46 Stat. 732, as amended, 746, as amended; 19 U.S.C. 1506(1), 1563(b) R.S. 251, as amended, sec. 624, 46 Stat. 759 (19 U.S.C. 66, 1624))
[T.D. 72-258, 37 FR 20171, Sept. 27, 1972, as amended by T.D. 77-12, 41 FR 56629, Dec. 29, 1976]
§ 146.35 Temporary deposit in a zone; incomplete documentation. ( a ) *General.* Temporary deposit of merchandise in a zone is allowed in circumstances where the information or documentation necessary to complete the Customs Form 214 is not available at the time of arrival of merchandise within the jurisdiction of the port. The merchandise will be subject to examination as provided in § 146.36.
( b ) *Application.* An application for temporary deposit will be made to the port director on a properly signed and uniquely numbered Customs Form 214, annotated clearly “Temporary Deposit in a Zone”.
( c ) *Conditions.* Merchandise temporarily deposited under the provisions of this section has no zone status and is considered to be in the Customs territory. It will: ( 1 ) Be physically segregated from all other zone merchandise;
( 2 ) Be held under the bond and at the risk of the operator; and
( 3 ) Be manipulated only to the extent necessary to obtain sufficient information about the merchandise to file the appropriate admission or entry documentation.
( d ) *Approval.* The port director shall approve the application for temporary deposit of merchandise in a zone if the provisions of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section are met.
( e ) *Submission of CBP Form 214.* A complete and accurate CBP Form 214 must be submitted, as provided in § 146.32, within 15 calendar days with no exceptions granted by the port director, or the merchandise will be placed in general order.
[T.D. 86-16, 51 FR 5049, Feb. 11, 1986, as amended by CBP Dec. 10-29, 75 FR 52452, Aug. 26, 2010]
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 98-22 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson June 5, 1998

OFFICE: 817/860-8128

PAGER: (800) 443-7243 (065477)

E-MAIL: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC GIVES SIEMENS GOOD SAFETY RATING IN LATEST PERFORMANCE

REVIEW

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has rated overall safety performance

as “good” at Siemens Power Corporation, a nuclear fuel manufacturing plant in

Richland, Washington, in the agency’s latest performance review.

Officials of the NRC and Siemens will meet to discuss the performance review

on Wednesday, June 10, at 8:15 a.m. The meeting will be held in the emergency

operations center at Siemens Power Corporation, and is open for public observation.

NRC officials will be available to answer questions after the meeting concludes.

The performance review covered the period January 31, 1996, through January

1 of this year. The company was rated in five major areas -- safety operations,

safeguards, radiological controls, facility support, and licensing activities.

Ellis W. Merschoff, regional administrator for NRC Region IV, said in a letter to

Siemens, “Overall, our review indicates that Siemens has continued to exhibit a good

level of performance with attention to safety.”

Performance reviews of nuclear fuel facilities do not assign numerical scores to

rate performance in the various areas examined as is done for commercial nuclear

power plants. Items that need improvement and challenges to performance are

identified, and the results are used to determine how much inspection effort will be

devoted to the plant in the future.

Program strengths were noted in the areas of criticality safety analyses,

radiological controls and facility support. Areas identified as needing improvement

included the packaging and shipping of nuclear fuel, the depth and exploration of issues

during the incident investigation process, and individuals’ performance and

accountability in carrying out established procedures and programs.
Based on this review, the NRC has decided to increase its inspection effort in

packaging and shipping of nuclear fuel, and will reduce the level of inspection in the

area of safeguards if current levels of performance continue. Inspection in safety

operations, radiological controls and facility support will also be reduced.

###

Note: A copy of the full report is available on the NRC’s internet web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-CV-23481-WILLIAMS

TIM-MINN, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

TIM HORTONS USA INC., 

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Judge Edwin G. Torres’ Report and 

Recommendation (DE 102 (“Report”)) on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Third 

Amended Complaint (DE 85). In the Report, Judge Torres recommended that the Motion 

be GRANTED IN PART. On August 16, 2021, Defendant filed objections to the Report. 

(DE 103 (“Objections”)). Based upon an independent review of the Report, the 

Objections, and the record, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. Judge Torres’ Report (DE 102) is ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED.

2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (DE 85) is GRANTED IN PART. Counts I, 

II, VII, VIII, IX, and X of the Third Amended Complaint (DE 81) are DISMISSED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE. 

3. By no later than October 14, 2021, Plaintiffs shall file one final amended 

complaint that solely amends the pleading defects identified in the Report with respect 

those counts. Plaintiffs may not add any additional parties or claims. 

DONE AND ORDERED in chambers in Miami, Florida this 30th day of September, 

2021.

Case 1:20-cv-23481-KMW Document 108 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

Case 1:20-cv-23481-KMW Document 108 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2021 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.824 Verification and justification of claim for preferential treatment. ( a ) *Verification.* A claim for preferential treatment made under § 10.803 of this subpart, including any declaration or other information submitted to CBP in support of the claim, will be subject to such verification as the Center director deems necessary. In the event that the Center director is provided with insufficient information to verify or substantiate the claim, the Center director may deny the claim for preferential treatment.
( b ) *Applicable accounting principles.* When conducting a verification of origin to which Generally Accepted Accounting Principles may be relevant, CBP will apply and accept the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles applicable in the country of production.
### §135a–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–94, div. P, title XIV, §1403(b), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 3207

Section, Pub. L. 87–765, Oct. 9, 1962, 76 Stat. 763; Pub. L. 89–522, §2, July 30, 1966, 80 Stat. 331, related to library of musical scores, instructional texts, and other specialized materials for use of blind persons or other physically disabled residents. See section 135a of this title.
ˇ ̨ ̨ ̋ ̧ ̊ ̇ ̆ ̄ ̧ ̃ ̊ ̊ˆıÙÛıÙıı  ̊ˆ ̊ ıııÛÛ

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL ˇˇ

 ̆ ̧ ̊ ̄ ̧ ̊ıııÛÛ

 ̇ ̇ ̃ ˇ ̇ ̃

 ̋ ̧  ̇ ̆ ̄ ̧   ̋  ̧ 

 ̇ ̆ ̄ ̧

ˆ ˇ ̊ˆ ıı ıÙˆÛÙ  

Û ˇ ̊ˆ ıˆ ˆˆÙˆÛÙ ˇ ̊ˆ ıˆ ˆıÙÛıÙıı

 ˇ ̊ ıı ıÙıÛÙıı ˇ ̊ıı ˆıÙÛıÙıı

ˇˇ ̃  ̊ ̨ ̧ ̆ ̊ ̄ ̆ ̊ ̧ ̋ ̧ ̧ ̄ ̨ ̊ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̧ ̧ ̊ ̧ ̄ ̧ ̊

 ̆ ̊ ̋ ̧ ̄ ̨ ̊ ̨ ̨ ̋ ̧ ̊ ̄ ̊ ̄ ̨ ̊ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̄ ̧

 ̃ ˇ ̊ˆıı ̊ˇ ̧ ̄ ̊ ̧ ̨ ̨ ̧ ̊ ̄ ̨ ̊ ̨ ̊ ̧ ̧ ̄ ̧ ̊ ̊ ̨

 ̆ ̋ ̆ ̊  ̆ ̄ ̧ ̊  ̨ ̊  ̋ ̄ ̊  ̊ ̆ ̄ ̧ ̊  ̆ ̊  ̨ ̊  ̊  ̧ ̊ ̆

 ̧ ̊ ̧ ̨ ̊ ̧ ̄ ̊ ̧ ̨ ̨ ̧ ̊ ̆ ̊ ̨ ̊ ̧ ̨ ̧ ̊

 ̆ ̆ ̧ ̧ ̄ ̊  ̇ ̧ ̄ ̧ ̊ Û ̊  ̊ ˇ ̧ ̄ ̊  ̧ ̨ ̨ ̧

 ̆

ˇ ̊ˆıˆ ̊ ̧ ̨ ̨ ̧ ̊ ̄ ̊ ̆ ̆ ̄ ̧ ̊ ̆ ̄ ̧ ̆ ̊ˇ ̧ ̄ ̨ ̊ ̆ ̄

 ̇ ̊ ̄ ̊ ̧ ̋ ̧ ̊ ̄ ̆ ̄ ̊ ̊ ̄ ̧ ̊ ̊ˇ ̧ ̄ ̊ ̧ ̨ ̨ ̧

 ̆ ̊ ̆ ̨ ̊ ̧ ̧ ̊ ̧ ̨ ̧ ̊ ̄ ̃

   ̆ ̊  ̧ ̨ ̨ ̄ ̧ ̨ ̊  ̋ ̆ ̧ ̊  ̆

 ̧ ̆ ̄ ̋ ̧

   ̆ ̄ ̧ ̊  ̆ ̧ ̨ ̊  ̋ ̧ ̊  ̄ ̊  ̆ ̄ ̨ ̊  ̧ ̧ ̄ ̨

 ̆ ̊  ̧ ̨ ̊  ̊  ̆ ̆ ̄ ̆ ̊  ̋ ̄ ̨ ̊  ̄ ̊  ̄ ̧

 ̊ ̊

   ̧ ̄ ̊ ̊ ̧ ̧ ̧ ̧ ̨

   ̧ ̄ ̊  ̊  ̧ ̧ ̧ ̊  ̧ ̊  ̋ ̧ ̨ ̊  ̊  ̋ ̧ ̄

 ̨ ̄ ̧ ̊  ̧ ̧ ̆ ̊  ̆ ̧ ̧ ̨ ̊  ̆ ̊  ̆ ̊  ̄ ̧ ̊  ̧ ̧ ̆

 ̆ ̧ ̧ ̨ ̊ ̆ ̊ ̄ ̧ ̊ ̧ ̊ ̋ ̧ ̨ ̊ ̄ ̊ ̄ ̧ ̊ ̧ ̧ ̧

 ̧ ̨ ̨ ̧ ̊ ̆ ̆ ̄ ̨ ̊ ̨ ̄ ̧ ̊ ̊ ̧ ̊

   ̧ ̆ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̧ ̧ ̨ ̊ ̧ ̊ ̊ ̧ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̧ ̊

 ̆ ̊ ̆ ̊ ̆ ̄ ̆ ̊ ̧ ̊ ̆ ̄ ̊ ̄ ̊ ̧ ̊ ̧

 ̊ ̆

  ̆  ̊ ̆ ̊ ̧ ̊ ̧ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̧ ̄ ̧ ̨ ̊ ̆ ̊ ̨ ̄ ̨ ̊ ̄ ̧

 ̧ ̆ ̊ ̧ ̧ ̆ ̊ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̊ ̆ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̄ ̊ ̄ ̧ ̊ ̧ ̧ ̆

 ̆ ̆ ̊ ̧ ̧ ̊ ̧ ̨ ̨ ̧ ̊ ̆ ̊ ̊ˆ

ˇ ̊ıı ̊ ̧ ̧ ̊ ̆ ̆ ̄ ̧ ̊ ̆ ̨ ̄ ̧ ̊ ̄ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̆ ̨ ̊ ̆
ıııÛÛ  ̊Û ̊ ˇ ̨ ̨ ̋ ̧ ̊ ̇ ̆ ̄ ̧ ̃ ̊ ̊ˆıÙÛıÙıı

 ̊ ̧ ̨ ̨ ̊ ̆ ̧ ̊ ̊ ̆ ̆ ̄ ̊ ̋ ̨ ̧ ̨

 ̇ˇˇˇ ̃ ̊ ̊ ̄ ̆ ̆

 ̇
§ 307.10 Pre-loan requirements. ( a ) RLF Recipients must adopt procedures to review the impacts of prospective loan proposals on the physical environment. The Plan must provide for compliance with applicable environmental laws and other regulations, including parts 302 and 314 of this chapter. The RLF Recipient also must adopt procedures to comply, and ensure that potential borrowers comply, with applicable environmental laws and regulations.
( b ) RLF Recipients must ensure that prospective borrowers, consultants, or contractors are aware of and comply with the Federal statutory and regulatory requirements that apply to activities carried out with RLF loans. Accordingly, RLF loan agreements shall include applicable Federal requirements to ensure compliance and RLF Recipients must adopt procedures to diligently correct instances of non-compliance, including loan call stipulations.
( c ) All RLF loan documents and procedures must protect and hold the Federal government harmless from and against all liabilities that the Federal government may incur as a result of providing an RLF Grant to assist directly or indirectly in site preparation or construction, as well as the direct or indirect renovation or repair of any facility or site. These protections apply to the extent that the Federal government may become potentially liable as a result of ground water, surface, soil or other natural or man-made conditions on the property caused by operations of the RLF Recipient or any of its borrowers, predecessors or successors.
[71 FR 56675, Sept. 27, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 76133, Dec. 19, 2014]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23524]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--National Marine Manufacturers Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), National Marine 
Manufacturers Association (``NMMA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: National 
Marine Manufacturers Association, Chicago, IL. The nature and scope of 
NMMA's standards development activities are: to develop, promulgate and 
make available voluntary lubricant performance standards for the marine 
industry. NMMA establishes performance standards and testing procedures 
for marine engine oils to assist boaters and manufacturers in 
identifying engine oils which have been specially formulated to 
withstand the rigors of use in marine engines. NMMA's voluntary 
consensus standards are developed by NMMA members with comments from 
the public. NMMA members include original equipment manufacturers, test 
laboratories, oil marketers and oil additive companies.
    Additional information concerning NMMA can be obtained from Tom 
Marhevko at NMMA at (312) 946-6213.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23524 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
###### Editorial Note on [Part 141](/current/title-19/part-141?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, [81 FR 93019](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/81-FR-93019), Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 141.33 Alternative form for noncommercial shipment.

An individual (but not a partnership, association, or corporation) who is not a regular importer may appoint another individual as his unpaid agent for Customs purposes by executing a power of attorney applicable to a single noncommercial shipment by writing, printing, or stamping on the invoice, or on a separate paper attached thereto, the following statement:

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_; of

(Name)(Address)

is hereby authorized to execute, as an unpaid agent who has knowledge of the facts, pursuant to the provisions of section 485(f), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, the consignee's and owner's declarations provided for in section 485 (a) and (d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and to enter on my behalf or for my account the goods described in the attached invoice which contains a true and complete statement of the facts concerning the shipment.

Date \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_, 19\_\_\_\_.

(Signature of importer)

(Address)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

The Board of Directors
Big City Radio, Inc.:

    We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of Big City Radio, Inc. of our report dated March 20, 1998, relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of Big City Radio, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for each of the years in the
two-year period ended December 31, 1997, and Schedule II, Combined Financial
Statement Schedules Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended
December 31, 1997 and 1996, which report appears in the December 31, 1997,
annual report on Form 10-K of Big City Radio, Inc.

                                             /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                                KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 30, 1998
### §4914. Academic year and summer term for page program

The page program shall consist of the two semesters of the academic year, plus a non-academic summer term.

(Pub. L. 98–367, title I, §103, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 479; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §204(40)(B), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1736.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 88c–2 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is based on section 2 of House Resolution No. 234, Ninety-eighth Congress, June 29, 1983, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 98–367.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "semesters of the academic year, plus a non-academic" for "terms of the academic year plus a".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section 5 of House Resolution No. 234, Ninety-eighth Congress, June 29, 1983, as enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 98–367, title I, §103, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 479, provided that: "This resolution [enacting this section, sections 4915 and 4916, and former section 88c–1 of this title] shall take effect on the date on which this resolution is agreed to [June 29, 1983], except that section 3(a)(1)(A) and section 3(b)(2) [section 4915(a)(1)(A), (b)(2) of this title] shall apply to terms beginning after November 30, 1983."