alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23807]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection


Notice of Cancellation of Customs Broker License

AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security.

ACTION: General notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
(19 U.S.C. 1641) and the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 111.51), the 
following Customs broker license is canceled without prejudice.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        License
                 Name                     No.          Issuing port
------------------------------------------------------------------------
J.E. Lowden & Co.....................     05118   San Francisco.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: October 8, 2004.
Jayson P. Ahern,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations.
[FR Doc. 04-23807 Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
§ 331.3 Scope and applicability. The provisions of this policy apply to all Federal departments and agencies, except as otherwise prohibited by law. In addition to these normal duties; ( a ) The Secretary of Commerce shall: ( 1 ) In cooperation with State economic development agencies, the Secretary of Defense, the Administrator of General Services, and the Administrator of Small Business Administration, assist concerns which have agreed to perform contracts in labor surplus areas in obtaining Government procurement business by providing such concerns with timely information on proposed Government procurements.
( 2 ) Urge concerns planning new production facilities to consider the advantages of locating in labor surplus areas.
( 3 ) Provide technical advice and counsel to groups and organizations in labor surplus areas on planning industrial parks, industrial development organizations, expanding tourist business, and available Federal aids.
( b ) The Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall make available to small business concerns in labor surplus areas all of its services, endeavor to ensure opportunity for maximum participation by such concerns in Government procurement, and give consideration to the needs of these concerns in the making of joint small business set-asides with Government procurement agencies.
( c ) OFPP shall coordinate the maintenance by Federal agencies of current information on the manufacturing capabilities of labor surplus area concerns with respect to Government procurement and disseminate such information to Federal departments and agencies.
Exhibit
32.1




Ener1,
Inc.


1540
Broadway, Suite 25C


New York,
New York 10036




January
19, 2010





Securities
and Exchange Commission


100 F
Street, NE


Washington,
DC 20549





Re:
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350





Dear
Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A Amendment
No .1 of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Charles Gassenheimer, Chief Executive
Officer of Ener1, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1)
            such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A Amendment No . 1 of Ener1,
      Inc., for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





2)
            the
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A Amendment
      No . 1 of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended March 31, 2009,
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of Ener1,
Inc.





/s/
      Charles GassenheimerCharles
      Gassenheimer
                    Chief
      Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
                    (Principal
      Executive Officer and
                    Duly
      Authorized
Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.





This
certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.1 to Ener1, Inc.’s
quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
filing.
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.930 General.

Except as otherwise provided in this subpart, all criminal, civil, or administrative penalties which may be imposed on U.S. importers, exporters, and producers for violations of the customs and related laws and regulations will also apply to U.S. importers, exporters, and producers for violations of the laws and regulations relating to the PTPA.
### §6564. Travel expenses of Secretary of Senate; advancement of travel funds to designated employees

For the purpose of carrying out his duties, the Secretary of the Senate is authorized to incur official travel expenses. The Secretary of the Senate is authorized to advance, in his discretion, to any designated employee under his jurisdiction, such sums as may be necessary, not exceeding $1,000, to defray official travel expenses in assisting the Secretary in carrying out his duties. Any such employee shall, as soon as practicable, furnish to the Secretary a detailed voucher for such expenses incurred and make settlement with respect to any amount so advanced. Payments to carry out the provisions of this section shall be made from funds included in the appropriation "Miscellaneous Items" under the heading "Contingent Expenses of the Senate" upon vouchers approved by the Secretary of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 94–59, title I, §101, July 25, 1975, 89 Stat. 273; Pub. L. 95–94, title I, §106, Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 661; Pub. L. 95–355, title I, §101, Sept. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 533; Pub. L. 97–12, title I, §102, June 5, 1981, 95 Stat. 61; Pub. L. 98–367, title I, §1, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 474.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 61a–9a of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–367 struck out provision that travel expenses could not exceed $10,000 during any fiscal year.

1981—Pub. L. 97–12 substituted "$10,000" for "$7,500".

1978—Pub. L. 95–355 substituted "$7,500" for "$5,500".

1977—Pub. L. 95–94 substituted "$5,500" for "$5,000".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Pub. L. 98–367, title I, §1, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 474, provided that the amendment made by section 1 is effective with respect to fiscal years beginning on or after Oct. 1, 1983.

#### Effective Date of 1981 Amendment

Pub. L. 97–12, title I, §102, June 5, 1981, 95 Stat. 61, provided that the amendment made by section 102 is effective with respect to fiscal years beginning on or after Oct. 1, 1980.

#### Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

Pub. L. 95–355, title I, §101, Sept. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 533, provided that the amendment made by section 101 is effective with the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 1978.

#### Effective Date of 1977 Amendment

Pub. L. 95–94, title I, §106, Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 661, provided that the amendment made by section 106 is effective Oct. 1, 1977.
###### Editorial Note on Part 152

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 152 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93022, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 152.3 Merchandise found not to correspond with invoice description.

When any merchandise not corresponding with the description given in the invoice is found by the examining officer, duties shall be assessed on the merchandise actually found. If the discrepancy appears conclusively to be the result of a mistake and not of any intent to defraud, no proceedings for forfeiture shall be taken. When the entire shipment does not agree with the invoice and there is no evidence of any intent to defraud, a new entry shall be required and the estimated duty paid on the original entry shall be refunded on liquidation as in the case of a nonimportation. (Sec. 499, 46 Stat. 728, as amended; 19 U.S.C. 1499)
(LOGO)NORWEST MORTGAGE                      Norwest Mortgage, Inc.
                                                  405 S.W. 5th Street
                                                  Des Moines, IA 50309-4626
                                                  515/237-6000


                              Management Assertion

As of and for the year ended December 3l, 1997, Norwest Mortgage Banking has
complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of America's  Uniform  Single  Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers.  As of this same period, Norwest Mortgage Banking
had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and  omissions  policy in the amount of
$100 million and $20 million, respectively.


/s/Mark C. Oman                                                 January 14,1998
Mark C. Oman                                                    Date
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

/s/Robert K. Chapman                                            January 14, 1998
Robert K. Chapman                                               Date
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICE

/s/Mike Heid                                                    January 14, 1998
Mike Heid                                                       Date
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT LOAN SERVICING
Inspire 1 Pro In the Box Inspire 1 Pro Quick Start Guide Inspire 1 Pro Safty Guidelines and Disclaimer Inspire 1 Pro Intelligent Flight Battery Safety Guidelines

© 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved. 

# INSPIRE 1 PRO

Harness ×1 (Complementary) Carrying Case ×1 (Complementary) Camera with Gimbal Box ×1 (Complementary) Aircraft Body ×1 Remote Controller ×1 Camera with Gimbal Kit ×1 including camera cap, lens front cap and lens rear cap

Propellers (Pair) ×4 Gimbal Clamp ×1 Intelligent Flight Battery (TB47) ×1

Battery Charger ×1 Manuals

Power Cable ×1 Remote Controller Charging Cable ×1 (Complementary) Micro-USB Cables ×2 (Complementary) 

# In the Box Check that all of the following items are included in the package. If any items are missing, please contact your seller.

SD Card ( 16GB ) ×1 (Complementary)

* Complementaries are not covered by Warranty.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-70 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, April 8, 1999)

NRC ISSUES CLEANUP CRITERIA

FOR URANIUM MILLS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is amending its regulations to provide criteria for

the cleanup of uranium and thorium in soil and radioactivity on building surfaces during the

decommissioning of uranium mills and other uranium extraction facilities.

The criteria represent upper limits on the radiation dose levels that would be permitted

as a result of uranium and thorium remaining at NRC-licensed uranium facilities after

decommissioning. The NRC previously used agency guidance documents to decide whether to

approve cleanup and decommissioning plans and determine if the license could be terminated.

The new dose criteria are based on the existing Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

soil standard for radium. The EPA previously set standards requiring that the concentration of

radium at uranium mills after decommissioning may not exceed natural background levels of

radiation by more than 5 picocuries per gram in the first 6 inches of soil, and 15 picocuries per

gram for every subsequent 6-inch layer. These standards have already been incorporated into

NRC’s regulations.

The new standard for uranium and thorium uses the radiation dose from radium in soil

as a benchmark. Licensees who are decommissioning their uranium facilities will have to

calculate the radiation dose from radium over 1,000 years for their particular site. They will then

have to remediate their site so that the dose from NRC-regulated uranium and thorium

remaining on site after decommissioning will not exceed the dose allowed for radium. The staff

recently calculated that the potential dose to an individual from applying the benchmark

approach may range between 22 and 34 millirems per year.

In addition, licensees will be required to demonstrate that radiation doses from NRCregulated materials are as low as is reasonably achievable.

In the unlikely event that application of this benchmark would result in a dose exceeding

100 millirems per year, the staff will consult with and receive the approval of the Commission

before approving the decommissioning plan. The 100-millirem dose is the NRC annual limit for

members of the public. The average annual dose to an individual in the United States from

natural background radiation is about 300 millirems.

###
### §§75b to 75e. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 75b, act May 1, 1947, ch. 49, title I, 61 Stat. 58, accorded Clerk of House the same priority as executive agencies under the Surplus Property Act of 1944, act Oct. 3, 1944, ch. 479, 58 Stat. 765. The Surplus Property Act of 1944, which was formerly classified principally to sections 1611 to 1646 of the former Appendix to Title 50, War and National Defense, was repealed, with certain exceptions, by act June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title V, §503, 63 Stat. 399, and the priorities thereunder expired Dec. 31, 1949. See References in Text note under section 352 of Title 30, Mineral Lands and Mining.

Sections 75c to 75e were omitted from the Code for lack of general applicability.

Section 75c, based on H. Res. No. 449, Sept. 21, 1961, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 87–730, §103, Oct. 2, 1962, 76 Stat. 693, related to basic compensation of Assistant Tally Clerks in Office of Clerk of House.

Section 75d, based on H. Res. No. 331, June 7, 1961, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 87–730, §103, Oct. 2, 1962, 76 Stat. 693, related to basic compensation of stationery and assistant stationery clerks.

Section 75e, based on H. Res. Nos. 225, 341, 402 and 773 of the 87th Congress, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 87–130, §103, Aug. 10, 1961, 75 Stat. 334; Pub. L. 87–730, §103, Oct. 2, 1962, 76 Stat. 693; Pub. L. 88–248, §103, Dec. 30, 1963, 77 Stat. 817, related to compensation of certain laborers and clerks in offices of Clerk, Doorkeeper and Postmaster of House.
### §480. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–484, §11, Oct. 13, 1972, 86 Stat. 802, which required the Office of Technology Assessment to submit an annual report to Congress on technology assessment and technological areas and programs requiring future analysis, terminated, effective May 15, 2000, pursuant to section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance. See, also, page 10 of House Document No. 103–7.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Performanceand annual report [electronic resource].**
 
SuDoc:HS 4.101:
ItemNumber: 0520-B-14 (online)
CGPsystem Number:000578709
 
2003
2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-99307) pertaining to the Technical Olympic USA, Inc. Annual and
Long-term Incentive Plan of Technical Olympic USA, Inc. of our report dated
January 31, 2003, except for Note 5, as to which the date is February 3, 2003,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Technical Olympic USA,
Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2002.


Miami, Florida
February 10, 2003

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert Glaser, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, as amended by this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A, of RealNetworks, Inc.; and


2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: April 29, 2016








/s/ Robert Glaser


Robert Glaser


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-035 June 14, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH AMERGEN ENERGY COMPANY

TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE AT OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of AmerGen Energy

Company on Wednesday, June 20, to discuss the results of the agencyís annual assessment of safety

performance at the Oyster Creek nuclear power plant.

 The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 2 p.m. in

the cafeteria of the Administration Building at the plant, located on Route 9 in Lacey Township, N.J. 

NRC officials will be available afterwards to answer questions.

 The performance period to be discussed is April 1, 2000, to March 31, 2001. Overall, the NRC

found that the plant operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and fully met all

cornerstone objectives during the period. A letter sent from the NRC Region I office to AmerGen

Energy addresses plant performance during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting

discussion. It is available on the NRC web site at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr/oyster_eoc2001.pdf

 Current performance information for the Oyster Creek plant is available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/OC/oc_chart.html

 ###
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-99-16 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Friday, April 2, 1999)

NRC FINDS PERFORMANCE ‘ACCEPTABLE’

IN LATEST REVIEW AT WATTS BAR

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found that safety performance remains

acceptable in the NRC’s latest plant performance review at the Watts Bar nuclear power plant,

operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority near Spring City, Tennessee.

In a letter to TVA, NRC official Paul E. Fredrickson said “overall performance at Watts

Bar was acceptable” during the evaluation period from December 1997 through January 1999

and that the unit operated at power during that time. He said “operations activities continued to

improve” and that “control room conduct and response to off-normal conditions continued to be

excellent.”

Fredrickson said “security performance initially declined but improved towards the end of

the period.” He said inadequate maintenance and testing had resulted in an ineffective security

detection and assessment system but that prompt corrective action was effective in improving

performance.

The text of the plant performance review letter is available from the NRC Region II Office of

Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr.

NRC reviews safety performance twice a year at every licensed nuclear power plant in the

nation. These reviews give the agency staff an integrated assessment of plant performance and

provide a basis for planning inspection activities.

Plant performance reviews are being used as an interim measure to monitor nuclear power

plant safety. The agency began using it for this purpose after suspending the Systematic

Assessment of License Performance (SALP) process until a new assessment program is

developed. Previously, SALP reports were issued every 12 to 24 months.

The new reactor oversight and assessment program being developed will provide quarterly

performance reports, based on a number of performance indicators and on inspection findings. This

program will be tested at eight sites, including TVA’s Sequoyah nuclear power plant near

Chattanooga, beginning in June and will be extended to all plants next January. A full description of

the new program is available on the NRC web site at:: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

#
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Marjorie O. Thomas, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K, as amended by this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A, of RealNetworks, Inc.; and


2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: April 28, 2017








/s/ Marjorie O. Thomas


Marjorie O. Thomas


Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)