alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# cl££i£X±i^ltAksLilsL P£T11TQN£R 

## FILED If^ COURTOFAPPEALS

12th CqurtofAppeals Qistrlct 

## In "Re. hWnLXA/. MAY 11 rm TYLER TEXAS 

# £ exnnb n.nu ^4V>e (s&VtVioner 

# p£ 

# PT\r^f\cLj

# ffttftijJglLftBRK 

# po^ *a pro pr*>cx persona, \o> KumUu be.e^in -formci

LC*^W^r£ o^u, or£ or cAX c& &\e SkW^ f.aiirVriAfcfr. 

# 1<XQU.^\^Vrfrpmec^ *o ^j^pnM r£VW,«a rr^aWoA. 

# VWefore, -V^ffW\rv\ rt^ec\^Vi re^vicfo \Wt ^^ Ho<\ CoorV ^u^'ftA order arr^Tm onA W^Wm Vvvfr *niu\\ 

# ^ J_^ J^Wntfak. XnVeofAm, 

# PWitiror\4e^\e*^ 'b, *WA*iO. . • 

# COMMONWEAITHOFKENTUCKy * DEPARTMENTOFCORRECTIONS

Inmate Name: EASTEHU KEHTOClCt CORBgCTiaSM. COHfLEI (Institution) f CERTIFICATION OP FUNDS DEPOSITED IN PRISONER' S INSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNT ' 

# tits/ey fMrs/^/rt- t )4n«/''n Ik. 

### (Middle) (Last)



## '•to? 9/9 

# ~~-(Fl^tT
•Institutional I.D. Number: 

## ^ X. ite&C L-fH^ of the gisTEM rr aamCBMg tamnxt
. ;J7 (Institution) Xmnate Accounts Office, do hereby certify that the aum q£ 

# g //>/, /fid has been deposited to ' this "inmate'a , account during the preceding six months.

.'



## ~Signature 21 Author

## / cer Date



### A 'k**.»>.♦»■-**KYDOC REPORT NO. IBSR180

- 35 6 MONTH AVERAGE INCOME STATEMENT PAGE: 1 of 1 PROCESSED: 04/28/2015 10:50 FROM: 10/2014 TO: 03/2015 REQUESTOR: Karen S Guyn

DOC#: 228919 INMATE NAME: Anglin, Wesley Satterfield SSN: 405-35-7714

Deposit Detail Total Deposit FOR MONTH: October, 2014 Deposit Type: State Pay Earned $10.40 $10.40 FOR MONTH: November, 2014 Deposit Type: State Pay Earned $10.40 $10.40 FOR MONTH: December, 2014 Deposit Type: Christmas Money Deposit State Pay Earned $10.00 $14.30 $24.30 FOR MONTH: January, 2015 Deposit Type: State Pay Earned $18.20 $18.20 FOR MONTH: February, 2015 Deposit Type: State Pay Earned $20.80 $20.80 FOR MONTH: March, 2015 Deposit Type: State Pay Earned $19.50 $19.50

TOTAL AMOUNT : $103.60 6 MONTH AVERAGE: $17.27
Editorial Note on Part 124
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 124 appear at 72 FR 50040, Aug. 30, 2007, and 76 FR 8253, Feb. 11, 2011.

§ 124.301 Voluntary withdrawal or voluntary early graduation. ( a ) A Participant may voluntarily withdraw from the 8(a) BD program at any time prior to the expiration of its program term. Where a Participant has substantially achieved the goals and objectives set forth in its business plan, it may elect to voluntarily early graduate from the 8(a) BD program.
( b ) To initiate withdrawal or early graduation from the 8(a) BD program, a Participant must notify its servicing SBA district office of its intent to do so in writing. Once the SBA servicing district office processes the request and the District Director recognizes the withdrawal or early graduation, the Participant is no longer eligible to receive any 8(a) BD program assistance.
[85 FR 66186, Oct. 16, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 1997 (Unaudited) and the
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months ended September 30,
1997 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            3,640,388 
<SECURITIES>                                      3,533,860 
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2,550,842 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         82,750 
<INVENTORY>                                         452,115 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 11,339,690 
<PP&E>                                            2,209,508 
<DEPRECIATION>                                      958,419 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   28,420,291 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4,315,339 
<BONDS>                                                   0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0 
<PREFERRED>                                               0 
<COMMON>                                             95,419 
<OTHER-SE>                                       19,410,650 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     28,420,291 
<SALES>                                           9,738,788 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 10,033,129 
<CGS>                                             6,130,719 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     6,130,719 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2,782,693 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      209 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1,302,156 
<INCOME-TAX>                                        499,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 803,156 
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0 
<CHANGES>                                                 0 
<NET-INCOME>                                        803,156 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0.08 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.08 
                                               


</TABLE>
#### Nathan Willner, Appellant, v. Marc Hermelin, Respondent.

Action to recover damages for slander. Order granting defendant’s motion under subdivision 9 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint, and the judgment entered pursuant thereto, unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. *(Youmans*V. *Smith,*153 N. Y. 214; *Karelas*v. *Baldwin,*237 App. Div. 265, 266.) Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 1:20-cv-23278-MGC

REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7505 AND 7171 

FOREST LANE, DALLAS, TEXAS 75230 et al.,

Defendant.

________________________________________________/

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 1:20-cv-23279-MGC

ALL RIGHT TO AND INTEREST IN PNC 

CORPORATE PLAZA HOLDINGS LLC,

Defendant.

________________________________________________/

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 1:20-cv-25313-MGC

REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 55 PUBLIC SQUARE,

CLEVELAND, OHIO,

Defendant.

________________________________________________/

UNITED STATES’ RESPONSE TO CLAIMANTS’ REQUEST FOR HEARING

The Court should disregard Claimants’ belated request for hearing, filed months after 

briefing was completed, because it is effectively a sur-reply that rehashes Claimants’ 

arguments. Cf. DE:81 at 7 and DE:83 at 3 (discussing identical provisions of Delaware Law). 

Where it is novel, it introduces irrelevant information, such as the status of litigation between 

Claimants and PrivatBank in Delaware Chancery Court, which has no bearing on Claimants’ 

Case 1:20-cv-23278-MGC Document 84 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

standing in this action. See DE:83 at n.3. The request also does not comply with Local Rule 

7.1(b)(2), which requires that it be made as part of a motion or opposition. 

And, in any event, a hearing on the United States’ motion to strike Claimants is not 

necessary. The papers speak for themselves, and the law is well settled: “a shareholder has 

no standing to contest the forfeiture of an asset of a corporation.” United States v. 479 Tamarind 

Drive, No. 98-Civ.-2279, 2011 WL 1045095, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 11, 2011). “[E]ven a sole 

shareholder [ ] lacks standing to contest the forfeiture of a corporation's assets.” United States 

v. All Assets Held in Acct. No. XXXXXXXX in name of Doraville Properties Corp., 299 F. Supp. 3d 

121, 140 (D.D.C. 2018) (collecting cases). See DE:79 at 7. 

Nevertheless, if the Court holds a hearing, the United States respectfully requests that 

it be scheduled after October 1, given the upcoming holidays and counsel’s planned travel.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: September 8, 2021 DEBORAH CONNOR, CHIEF

MONEY LAUNDERING & ASSET 

RECOVERY SECTION

By: /s/ Shai D. Bronshtein

Shai D. Bronshtein (ID No. A5502665)

Rachel E. Goldstein

Trial Attorneys

United States Department of Justice 

1400 New York Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20005

Telephone: (202) 616-5950

Shai.Bronshtein@usdoj.gov

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ

ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Adrienne E. Rosen

Adrienne E. Rosen (ID No. A5502297)

Marx P. Calderón (ID No. A5502700)

United States Attorney’s Office

99 Northeast Fourth Street, 7th Floor

Miami, Florida 33132

Telephone: (305) 961-9338

Adrienne.Rosen@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America

Case 1:20-cv-23278-MGC Document 84 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2021 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, M. Farooq Kathwari, hereby certify that the March 31, 2009 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed by Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (the “Company”), which contains the Company’s financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ M. Farooq Kathwari | Chairman, President and |   |
|------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| (M. Farooq Kathwari)   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                   |                    |   |
|                   |                    |   |
| May 11, 2009      |                    |   |

 

1
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-67 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, May 11, 1998)

NRC PUBLISHES REVISION OF ENFORCEMENT POLICY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has published, and is taking public

comments on, a new revision of its Enforcement Policy, based on the NRC staff’s

experience since the policy was comprehensively revised nearly three years ago.

The newest version does not change the central thrust of the June 1995 revision,

which resulted from a major re-examination of the NRC’s enforcement program by a

team of senior managers.

As a result of that study, the Enforcement Policy was amended to emphasize the

importance of licensees identifying problems before they happen and promptly

correcting them once they are found. It also focused on licensees’ current performance

and directed NRC attention to licensees which had multiple enforcement actions in a

relatively short time.

Since the adoption of the revised policy in 1995, the Commission has received

public comments on it. Also since then, the NRC staff, with Commission approval, has

made 10 further changes, many of them editorial corrections and language clarification.

The civil penalty schedule was adjusted to reflect more accurately risks of

various violations and to treat more equitably large and small licensees. The policy was

further amended to deal with instances when nuclear power plant licensees violate

commitments made in the plant safety analysis report.

The new, comprehensive Enforcement Policy revision--together with

supplementary information and background--will be published shortly in the Federal

Register and will be available for inspection and copying for a fee at the NRC Public

Document Room, 2120 L Street, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

Persons who wish to comment on it may submit written comments to David L.

Meyer, Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office

of Administration, Mail Stop T6D59, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,

DC 20555. Comments may be hand-delivered between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on
Federal workdays to 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. Comments will be accepted

for 75 days after Federal Register publication.

A summary of the staff’s review of the revised Enforcement policy, conducted

between July 1995 and July 1997, has been published as NUREG-1622, NRC

Enforcement Policy Review. It is also available at the NRC Public Document Room and

may be purchased from the Government Printing Office.

###
Case 1:20-cv-23276-DPG Document 148-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/06/2021 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-23276-DPG Document 148-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/06/2021 Page 2 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-23276-DPG Document 148-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/06/2021 Page 3 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-23276-DPG Document 148-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/06/2021 Page 4 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-23276-DPG Document 148-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/06/2021 Page 5 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-23276-DPG Document 148-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/06/2021 Page 6 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-23276-DPG Document 148-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/06/2021 Page 7 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-23276-DPG Document 148-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/06/2021 Page 8 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-23276-DPG Document 148-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/06/2021 Page 9 of 14
Case 1:20-cv-23276-DPG Document 148-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/06/2021 Page 10 of

14
Case 1:20-cv-23276-DPG Document 148-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/06/2021 Page 11 of

14
Case 1:20-cv-23276-DPG Document 148-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/06/2021 Page 12 of

14
Case 1:20-cv-23276-DPG Document 148-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/06/2021 Page 13 of

14
Case 1:20-cv-23276-DPG Document 148-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/06/2021 Page 14 of

14
[Exhibit 32.1]

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Med Gen, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report'), I, Paul B. Kravitz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

February 8, 2007					/s/ Paul B. Kravitz
							---------------------------
							Paul B. Kravitz,
							Principal Executive Officer
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-59 July 28, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610)337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING NEAR THREE MILE ISLAND 1 NUCLEAR PLANT

ON CHANGES IN REACTOR OVERSIGHT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a public meeting for Wednesday, August

2, in Middletown, Pa., to discuss the agency’s new reactor oversight process. Middletown is home to

the Three Mile Island 1 nuclear power plant, one of the nation’s 103 operating commercial reactors.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. at Middletown Area High School, 11155 North Union Street.

Members of the public will have the opportunity to ask questions of NRC staff during and after the

meeting.

The new oversight process uses more objective, timely and safety-significant criteria in

assessing performance while seeking to more effectively and efficiently regulate the industry. Under

the new process, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional office-based personnel are

supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance indicators. These

performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant operations, including the viability of

redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection and security measures.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC’s web site every three months. The safety significance of each inspection finding or performance

indicator is characterized by a color -- green, white, yellow or red.

The NRC response to the inspection finding and performance indicators will be based on the

significance of the items. A green finding receives normal NRC oversight, while white, yellow or red

assessments receive increasing NRC involvement. Multiple red findings could result in a plant

shutdown.

A plain language summary of the reactor oversight process is available from the NRC Office

of Public Affairs or on the web site at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm

Detailed information regarding the reactor oversight process is available on the web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html

#
### **CHAPTER 41—CONGRESSIONAL OFFICERS AND ADMINISTRATION**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL

Sec.
4101.
Authority of officers of Congress over Congressional employees.
4102.
Purchase of supplies for Senate and House.
4103.
Contracts to furnish property, supplies, or services to Congress; terms varying from those offered other entities of Federal Government.
4104.
American goods to be preferred in purchases for Senate and House.
4105.
Purchase of paper, envelopes, etc., for stationery rooms of Senate and House.
4106.
Stationery rooms of House and Senate; specification of classes of articles purchasable.
4107.
Withdrawal of unexpended balances of appropriations.
4108.
Semiannual statements of expenditures by Secretary of Senate and Chief Administrative Officer of House.
4109.
Detailed reports of receipts and expenditures by Secretary of Senate and Chief Administrative Officer of House.
4110.
Monuments to deceased Senators or House Members.
4111.
Annual report by Comptroller General of the United States on cybersecurity and surveillance threats to Congress.
4112.
Requirement for information sharing agreements.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—ATTENDING PHYSICIAN

4121.
Monies received by Attending Physician from sale of prescription drugs or other sources; deposit of receipts.
4122.
Deposit of fees for services by Office of Attending Physician; availability of amounts deposited.
4123.
Authority of Attending Physician in response to medical contingencies or public health emergencies at Capitol.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—RECORDING AND PHOTOGRAPHIC STUDIOS

4131.
House Recording Studio; Senate Recording Studio and Senate Photographic Studio.
4132.
Senate Recording Studio and Senate Photographic Studio as successors to Senate Recording and Photographic Studios; rules, regulations, and fees for photographs and photographic services.
#### Henry P. Pfohl and Another, Respondents, v. John P. Rupp and Another, Appellants.

Appeal dismissed unless appellants file and serve briefs by June 16, 1914.
§ 148.6 Entry of unaccompanied shipments of effects subject to personal exemptions. ( a ) *Declaration to support free entry.* When effects claimed to be free of duty under subheadings 9804.00.10, 9804.00.20, 9804.00.25, 9804.00.35 or 9804.00.45, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) (19 U.S.C. 1202), do not accompany the importer on his arrival in the United States or are forwarded in bond, a declaration of the importer on Customs Form 3299, or its electronic equivalent, shall be required to support the claim for free entry. However, an oral declaration may be accepted in lieu of a written declaration on Customs Form 3299, for effects of a resident which are free of duty under subheadings 9804.00.10 or 9804.00.45. Effects of returning residents entitled to free entry under subheadings 9804.00.10 or 9804.00.45 (except automobiles and other vehicles of residents returning from countries other than Canada or Mexico) need not be itemized if a written declaration is required.
( b ) *Exemption from entry.* If the port director is satisfied that an entry would serve no good purpose, none need be required, but evidence of ownership for Customs purposes, such as a carrier's certificate or properly endorsed bill of lading, shall be required with the declaration. Such exemption from entry may also be applied with respect to household effects or tools of trade entitled to free entry (see §§ 148.52 and 148.53 respectively) which are unaccompanied or forwarded in bond.
[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51264, Dec. 21, 1988; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61291, Oct. 13, 2015]
Editorial Note on Part 142
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 142.45 Use of bar code by entry filer. ( a ) *Printing of C-4 Code.* Upon receipt of an approved Line Release application, the entry filer, in accordance with instructions from the port director, shall preprint invoices with the C-4 Code in bar code and alpha-numeric format or print labels with the necessary information. Bar codes shall be printed in accordance with the specifications stated in Customs Publication 561 (*Line Release Overview*). Labels or preprinted invoices also shall state the name of the shipper or manufacturer of the product and the name of the importer of record, if other than the entry filer, above the bar code and the name of the entry filer and a product description below the bar code.
( b ) *Multiple commodity processing.* Multiple commodity processing allows more than one product to be released under one entry number. The shipper/manufacturer, importer of record and the entry filer must be the same. The product description is the only variable allowed. The commodities should be listed on one invoice with C-4 Code labels for each commodity attached to the invoice.
( c ) *Distribution of labels.* If labels are used, the labels shall be affixed to the invoices in accordance with instructions from the port director. The entry filer may either affix the labels or distribute the labels to the shippers/manufacturers and instruct them in the use and placement of the labels.
#### § 113.36 Partner acting as surety on behalf of a partner or on behalf of a partnership.

A member of a partnership will not be accepted as an individual surety on a bond executed by the partnership as principal. A partner may be an individual surety for a fellow partner on a bond if (a) the transaction is in an individual capacity and unrelated to the partnership, (b) sufficient unencumbered nonpartnership property is available as security, and (c) the individual qualifies as an individual surety under the provisions of § 113.35 of this part.

[T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41171, Oct. 19, 1984, as amended by CBP Dec. 15-15, 80 FR 70165, Nov. 13, 2015]
Exhibit 31.1



SHOE CARNIVAL, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Clifton E. Sifford, certify that:

|1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Shoe Carnival, Inc.; and                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|Date:  June 22, 2018 | By:  /s/ Clifton E. SiffordClifton E. SiffordPresident andChief Executive Officer
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------