alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 7, 2015

Mr. Anthony DiVerniero

Key Air, LLC

3 Juliano Drive, Suite 201

Oxford, CT 06478

Dear Mr. DiVerniero:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§ 135.225(f) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 23, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Key Air, LLC into the public 

docket (No. FAA-2011-0337), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

• The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlined in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brandon Roberts

Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3

Project No.: AFS-15-2479-E

Project Officer: _______________

ARM-101:KJones:6/30/2015:Doc# 44625

ARM-1/100/101:Program Office AFS-200

MR. ANTHONY DIVERNIERO

KEY AIR, LLC

3 JULIANO DRIVE, SUITE 201

OXFORD, CT 06478
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-03-020 April 21, 2003

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

 NRC STAFF TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS AUGMENTED 

INSPECTION OF SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

Officials of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with Schlumberger

Technology Corporation officials in Houston, TX, on April 28 to discuss the results of the

NRC’s review of the exposure of oilfield workers to radiation in excess of NRC limits.

The meeting between the NRC and Schlumberger of Sugarland, TX, will begin at 1:00

p.m. at the Embassy Suites, 9090 Southwest Freeway, and is open to public observation. NRC

officials will be available after the meeting to answer questions from the public.

The incident occurred on a temporary job site near Havre, Montana, on May 21, 2002

when a worker failed to properly transfer a radioactive source to its storage container after

removing it from a well-logging device. These devices use radioactive material to obtain

information about underground rock formations and the likely presence and amounts of gas or

oil. As a result of human error, the radioactive source lay on the drill rig floor for about 56

hours. During this period, some oilfield workers were exposed to radiation. None of the

individuals are expected to suffer any adverse health effects from the occurrence. NRC exposure

limits for radiation workers are 50 times greater than for members of the public.

NRC was notified by Schlumberger of the incident on May 25 and dispatched a reactive

inspection team to the site to determine the details of the incident. An Augmented Inspection

was ordered following initial tests on one worker that suggested he may have received an

unusually high dose of radiation. 

The NRC’s Augmented Inspection was conducted between September 24, 2002 and April

28, 2003. It included a thorough review of the sequence of events and the company’s response,

evaluation and corrective actions. The NRC’s final inspection report will be available to the

public about 30 days after the meeting.

###
EXHIBIT 32



Certification pursuant to

18
U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Herbert W. Watts, President and Chief Executive Officer, and John M. Digby, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, of Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he
has reviewed the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2005 and that to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of
the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|September 26, 2005 |  | \s\ Herbert W. Watts                 
|Date               |  | Herbert W. Watts                     
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                   | 
|September 26, 2005 |  | \s\ John M. Digby                    
|Date               |  | John M. Digby                        
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE INVENTOR HOLDINGS, LLC,

______________________

2014

- 1363

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination No. 90/009,918.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

T AREK N. F AHMI , Ascenda Law Group, PC, of San J ose, California, argued for appellant.

C OKE M ORGAN S TEWART , Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With h er on the brief were

N ATHAN K. K ELLEY

, Solicitor, an d J EREMIAH S. H ELM

, Associate Solicitor.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :P ER C URIAM (O’M ALLEY

, C LEVENGER

, and B RYSON

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

December 4, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-23287-CIV-GAYLES/OTAZO-REYES

LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

IMPERIAL BRANDS PLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

______________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT 

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Agreed Motion for an Order Setting 

Briefing Schedule for Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint [D.E. 164], and good 

cause appearing therefore, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED. 

Plaintiffs shall file their Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint on or before December 20, 

2021. Defendants shall file their respective responses to Plaintiffs’ motion on or before January 

19, 2022. Plaintiffs shall file their reply to the motion on February 18, 2022. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 20th day of December, 2021.

____________________________________ 

ALICIA M. OTAZO-REYES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

cc: United States District Judge Darrin P. Gayles

Counsel of Record 

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 166 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/20/2021 Page 1 of 1
§ 207.112 Hearings. ( a ) *Purpose of and scheduling of hearings.* An opportunity for a hearing before an administrative law judge shall be provided for each action initiated under § 207.102 of this subpart. The purpose of such hearing shall be to receive evidence and hear argument in order to determine whether a charged party has committed a prohibited act and if so, what sanctions are appropriate. Hearings shall proceed with all reasonable expedition, and, insofar as practicable, shall be held at one place, continuing until completed, unless otherwise ordered by the administrative law judge.
( b ) *Joinder or consolidation.* The administrative law judge may order such joinder or consolidation of proceedings initiated under § 207.102 of this subpart at the administrative law judge's discretion.
( c ) *Compliance with Administrative Procedure Act.* The administrative law judge shall conduct a hearing that complies with the requirements of section 554 of title 5 of the United States Code.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-005 January 14, 2002

 

 NRC SCHEDULES THREE-DAY CONFERENCE TO DISCUSS

REGULATORY ISSUES WITH NUCLEAR INDUSTRY

Advanced registration is now available for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's 14th Annual

Regulatory Information Conference, to be held March 5 - 7, at the Capital Hilton Hotel, 16th and K

Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C.

The conference, sponsored by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, will focus on major

issues and initiatives associated with the regulation of commercial nuclear power plants. The NRC's

revised oversight process, risk-informed regulations, license renewal and decommissioning are among

the topics slated for discussion. The agenda for the conference was developed using suggestions

provided by attendees at last yearís meeting as well as suggestions invited by NRC on its Internet web

site.

Additional information is available through the NRC's conference Web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/regs-guides-comm/ric/2002/index.html. The conference is open

to the public, but advanced registration is suggested. 

 William D. Travers, Executive Director for Operations and Samuel J. Collins, Director, Office

of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, will open the conference on Tuesday, March 5, at 1 p.m., and Chairman

Richard A. Meserve will deliver the keynote speech. Breakout sessions will follow on

safeguards/security issues, new reactor licensing, decommissioning, the allegations process, and safety

conscious work environments. Commissioner Nils J. Diaz will lead a plenary session in the afternoon.

On Wednesday, the conference will begin at 8 a.m. with issue-specific breakout sessions on the

revised oversight process, circumferential cracking of control rod drives, nuclear waste, power uprates,

risk-informed regulation technical requirements, international issues and perspectives, and public

confidence and communications. Commissioner Greta Joy Dicus will conduct a plenary session before

lunch. Commissioner Edward McGaffigan, Jr. will conduct a plenary session after lunch.

The Wednesday post-luncheon schedule will include Commissioner Jeffrey S. Merrifield

addressing the conferees in a plenary session. Afternoon breakout sessions will follow on emergent

technical and business topics, license renewal, and technical specifications initiatives. 
The Thursday session will begin at 8 a.m. with Mr. Collins scheduled to speak about regulatory

trends and initiatives for improving nuclear reactor safety. This will be followed by separate regional

breakout sessions. A feedback plenary session will be held prior to adjournment.

A complete agenda will be posted to the RIC web site when finalized.

 # # # #
No. 3491

#### Bernard J. Taub, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 9, 1943.*

Max' J. Becker, (Leo Segall, of Counsel), for claimant.

George F. Barrett, Attorney General; William L. Morgan, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Eckert, J.

The claimant, Bernard J. Taub, is an employee of the Department of Labor, Division of Unemployment *97Compensation of the State of Illinois. His employment necessitates his travel about the State by automobile. On February 10, 1940, while returning to his Chicago office from a field investigation in Southern Illinois, he was in an automobile accident and sustained a fracture of transverse processes of the third and fourth lumber vertebrae.

He was first attended by Dr. John Horowitz at St. Mary’s Hospital in Kankakee, where he remained for twelve days. He was also attended by Dr. George Mueller of Chicago, and subsequently was moved by ambulance to the Edgewater Hospital at Chicago, where he remained for two weeks. He returned to work on April 25, 1940. He received no compensation while he was incapacitated, and respondent, although requested to do so, failed to furnish necessary medical services.

At the time of the accident, claimant and respondent were operating under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of this State, and notice of the accident and claim for compensation were made within the time provided by the Act. The accident arose out of and in the course of the employment.

Claimant has paid Dr. Horowitz for his services the sum of $30.00, Dr. George Mueller, the sum of $65.00, St. Mary’s Hospital, Kankakee, Illinois, the sum of $55.45, • and the Edgewater Hospital of Chicago, Illinois, the sum of $86.10. He also paid the sum of $65.00 for ambulance transportation from St. Mary’s Hospital in Kankakee to the Edgewater Hospital in Chicago.

Claim is made for compensation for the period claimant was totally incapacitated, and for medical and hospital services. No claim is made for permanent disability.

*98Claimant is entitled* to an award for temporary total disability, resulting from the injury, for a period of ten and five-sevenths weeks, at a compensation rate of $16.50 per week, or a total sum of $176.78. Claimant is also entitled to be reimbursed for his hospital and medical expenses in the sum of $301.55.

Award is therefore entered in the total sum of $478.33, all of which has 'accrued and is payable forthwith.
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No: II-01-045 November 14, 2001 

 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov 

NRC COMMISSIONER TO VISIT ST. LUCIE NUCLEAR PLANT ON NOVEMBER 16

 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissioner Dr. Nils J. Diaz will visit Florida Power & Light

Companyís St. Lucie nuclear power plant on Friday, November 16, to tour the facility and discuss its

operation with company officials.

 Commissioner Diaz will be available to meet with interested news media representatives at 2:00

p.m. in the auditorium of the plant visitor and training center, located adjacent to the plant.

 Commissioner Diaz was first sworn in as a commissioner of the NRC on August 23, 1996 for a

five-year term and nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate on October 4 of this year

for a second five-year term.

 Before joining the NRC, Dr. Diaz was a professor of nuclear engineering at the University of

Florida and director of the Innovative Nuclear Space Power and Propulsion Institute, a national

consortium of universities and industry, which he founded, He also was president of Florida Nuclear

Associates, Inc., a high technology research and consulting firm.

 Dr. Diaz received a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of

Villanova, in Cuba, and both Master of Science and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Florida in

nuclear sciences.

###

 EDITORS: Electronic and print reporters who desire to meet with the commissioner at 2:00 p.m.

 Should arrange to be at the site at least one-hour early for processing through security.

 Reporters should go to Gate B.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-016 March 14, 2002 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC ISSUES CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER TO 

PENNSYLVANIA MEDICAL FIRM

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Action Letter to a Jenkins

Township, Pa., medical company that provides nuclear medicine services. The letter confirms the

company's agreement to halt all NRC-licensed activities until it takes several actions to conform to

agency regulations.

Advanced Medical Imaging, Inc., has an NRC license that allows it to use certain types of

nuclear material to perform diagnostic tests, such as radioactive imaging.

During a telephone conversation on March 13, the NRC confirmed the company is conducting 

NRC-licensed activities without a radiation safety officer as required by its NRC license. The agency

found that the radiation safety officer listed on the companyís license was not serving in that capacity.

Advanced Medical Imaging has agreed to take the following actions prior to resuming licensed

activities: immediately place all NRC-licensed nuclear materials in its possession in secure storage and

cease all licensed activities until it has obtained an NRC-approved authorized radiation safety officer;

and provide to the NRC a written statement that the RSO has read and understands the duties of an

RSO and is willing and able to carry them out. 

The company must notify the agency in writing when it has completed these actions.

 ###
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITS REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000895648
<NAME> GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          29,913
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,974
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,470,178
<DEPRECIATION>                               (259,214)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,394,889
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,140,895
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          337,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,590
<OTHER-SE>                                     751,944
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,394,889
<SALES>                                        169,065
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               169,065
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   729
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,971
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,015
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             40,015
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,596
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71
        

</TABLE>
```

                                                                EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin E.
Franklin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

                          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                              section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                              Act of 1934; and
                          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
                              presents, in all material respects, the financial
                              condition and results of operations of the
                              Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Martin E. Franklin
----------------------
Martin E. Franklin
Chief Executive Officer
November 8, 2004

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ian G.H. Ashken,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

                         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                              section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                              Act of 1934; and
                         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
                              presents, in all material respects, the financial
                              condition and results of operations of the
                              Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Ian G.H. Ashken
-------------------
Ian G.H. Ashken
Chief Financial Officer
November 8, 2004
```