alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 805 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 805

        To repeal the wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 17 (legislative day, March 16), 2021

  Mr. Lee (for himself, Mr. Scott of South Carolina, Mr. Cornyn, Mrs. 
   Blackburn, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Inhofe, and Mr. Cruz) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To repeal the wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Davis-Bacon Repeal Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DAVIS-BACON WAGE REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United 
States Code, is repealed.
    (b) Reference.--Any reference in any law to a requirement under 
subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code, shall be 
null and void.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE AND LIMITATION.

    Section 2, and the amendment made by such section, shall take 
effect 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act but shall not 
affect any contract that is--
            (1) in existence on the date that is 30 days after such 
        date of enactment; or
            (2) made pursuant to an invitation for bids outstanding on 
        the date that is 30 days after such date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
### §1975. Overseas travel

#### (a) Definition

In this section, the term "United States" means each of the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, and the territories and possessions of the United States.

#### (b) In general

A member of the Capitol Police may travel outside of the United States if—

(1) that travel is with, or in preparation for, travel of a Senator, including travel of a Senator as part of a congressional delegation;

(2) the member of the Capitol Police is performing security advisory and liaison functions (including advance security liaison preparations) relating to the travel of that Senator; and

(3) the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate gives prior approval to the travel of the member of the Capitol Police.

#### (c) Law enforcement functions

Subsection (b) shall not be construed to authorize the performance of law enforcement functions by a member of the Capitol Police in connection with the travel authorized under that subsection.

#### (d) Reimbursement

The Capitol Police shall be reimbursed for the overtime pay, travel, and related expenses of any member of the Capitol Police who travels under the authority of this section. Any reimbursement under this subsection shall be paid from the account under the heading "sergeant at arms and doorkeeper of the senate" under the heading "Contingent Expenses of the Senate".

#### (e) Amounts received

Any amounts received by the Capitol Police for reimbursements under subsection (d) shall be credited to the accounts established for the general expenses or salaries of the Capitol Police, and shall be available to carry out the purposes of such accounts during the fiscal year in which the amounts are received and the following fiscal year.

#### (f) Effective date

This section shall apply to fiscal year 2005 and each fiscal year thereafter.

(Pub. L. 108–447, div. G, title I, §12, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3171.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2005, which is div. G of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005.
NRC NEWS U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-02-013 March 25, 2002

CONTACT: Breck Henderson E-mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

NRC TO MEET WITH NPPD

TO DISCUSS SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT COOPER NUCLEAR STATION

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Nebraska

Public Power District on Tuesday, April 2, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual assessment of

safety performance at the Cooper Nuclear Station. The facility is located near Brownville, Nebraska,

and is operated by NPPD.

The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 

7 p.m. at the Brownville Concert Hall, Atlantic Ave. & 2nd St., Brownville. NRC staff will be

available before the meeting is adjourned to answer any questions from the public.

A letter sent from NRC Region IV to NPPD addresses plant performance during the period

April 1 to December 31, 2001, and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on

the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/cns_2001q4.pdf.

Current performance information for Cooper Nuclear Station is available on the NRC web site

at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CNS/cns_chart.html.

###
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-180 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, December 9, 1996)

REYES TO BE NEW NRC REGION II ADMINISTRATOR

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has named Luis A. Reyes as

new Regional Administrator of NRC Region II, which has offices in

Atlanta.

Mr. Reyes, who has been Deputy Regional Administrator since

June 1992, will succeed Stewart D. Ebneter, who is retiring. Mr.

Reyes will assume his new duties on January 3. A new Deputy

Regional Administrator will be named soon.

A graduate of the University of Puerto Rico with a

bachelor's degree in electrical engineering and a master's degree

in nuclear engineering, Mr. Reyes joined NRC in February 1978 as

a reactor inspector in the agency's Region III office in

Illinois. He was the first NRC senior resident inspector at the

Davis-Besse plant in Ohio; his performance earned him an NRC

Meritorious Service Award. Later, he served in several different

management posts in the Region III office.

In 1986, Mr. Reyes transferred to the Atlanta regional

office, where he was first deputy director and later director of

the Division of Reactor Projects before being appointed Deputy

Regional Administrator. While in the division director post, he

received the Presidential Meritorious Executive Award.

A licensed professional engineer, Mr. Reyes has done postgraduate work in fusion energy. Before joining NRC, he worked

for Argonne National Laboratory at the Experimental Breeder

Reactor II facility at Idaho National Engineering Laboratory.

Mr. Reyes and his wife, Alice, have a son, Luis, and a

daughter, Maria, and live in Marietta, Georgia.

###
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-130 August 31, 2000

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE

TO MEET IN LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, SEPTEMBER 19 - 21

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW) has

scheduled a meeting from September 19 - 21 in Las Vegas, Nevada, to discuss issues relating to the

proposed high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in Ballroom C of the Crowne Plaza

Hotel, at 4255 South Paradise Road, starting at 8 a.m. on each of the first two days.

On the opening day, the committee and the NRC staff will discuss the agency’s plan for

reviewing a possible application from the Department of Energy (DOE) to build and operate the

repository. Beginning at 4:15 p.m., the committee will hear comments from stakeholders that include

representatives of the State of Nevada, Nye County, Clark County, the Nevada Nuclear Waste Task

Force, and Lincoln County.

On September 20, the committee will discuss progress at the site with DOE officials, as well as

a DOE site recommendation report and total system performance assessment. It also will hear from

federal and state officials, as well as members of the academic community, during a session on the

issue of Chlorine 36. The committee will discuss details of its next day’s planned Yucca Mountain

tour, and will finalize topics and presentations for its next public meeting with the Commission on

October 17.

Those who wish to make oral or written statements, or seek additional information on the

meeting or changes to the agenda should contact Howard Larson, at 301-415-6805.

A detailed agenda and other aspects of the meeting will be described in an upcoming edition of

the Federal Register. ACNW meeting notices, transcripts and letters are available, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW/ on the internet.

##
#### § 165.44 Additional information.

CBP may request additional written information from the parties to the investigation at any time during the review process. The parties who provide the requested additional information must provide a public version to the other parties to the investigation via an email message or through any other method approved or designated by CBP. The submission of additional information requested by CBP must comply with requirements for release of information in § 165.4. CBP may apply an adverse inference as stated in § 165.6 if the additional information requested under this section is not provided. CBP will only accept written submissions of additional information in response to a request by CBP. No meetings or any other methods of unsolicited submission of additional information are permitted during the administrative review.

[89 FR 19261, Mar. 18, 2024]
Editorial Note on Part 141
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 141.63 Submission of entry summary documentation for preliminary review. ( a ) *Before arrival of merchandise.* Entry summary documentation may be submitted at the customhouse for preliminary review, without estimated duties attached, within such time before arrival of the merchandise as may be fixed by the Center director— ( 1 ) If the entry summary documentation will be filed at time of entry to serve as both the entry and the entry summary, as provided in § 142.3(b) of this chapter, or
( 2 ) In the case of quota-class merchandise, if the entry summary for consumption will be presented at time of entry, as provided in § 132.11a of this chapter. Estimated duties will not be accepted before arrival of the merchandise within the port limits.
( b ) *After arrival of merchandise.* Entry summary documentation may be submitted at the customhouse for preliminary review, without estimated duties attached, within such time after arrival of quota-class merchandise as may be fixed by the Center director, if the entry summary for consumption will be presented at the opening of the quota period, as provided in § 132.12(a) of this chapter. Estimated duties will not be accepted before the opening of the quota period.
[T.D. 79-221, 44 FR 46819, Aug. 9, 1979, as amended by T.D. 87-78, 52 FR 24155, June 29, 1987; CBP Dec. 09-47, 74 FR 69019, Dec. 30, 2009]
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.541 Indirect materials.

An indirect material, as defined in § 10.502(j) of this subpart, will be considered to be an originating material without regard to where it is produced, and its value will be the cost registered in the accounting records of the producer of the good.

# Example.

Singaporean Producer C produces good C using non-originating material A. Producer C imports non-originating rubber gloves for use by workers in the production of good C. Good C is subject to a tariff shift requirement. As provided in § 10.531(b)(1) of this subpart and General Note 25(o), each of the non-originating materials in good C must undergo the specified change in tariff classification in order for good C to be considered originating. Although non-originating material A must undergo the applicable tariff shift in order for good C to be considered originating, the rubber gloves do not because they are indirect materials and are considered originating without regard to where they are produced.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of PLM Equipment Growth & Income Fund VII (the Partnership), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner and of the Partnership, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the Report of the Partnership filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 
 
 
 /s/ Richard K Brock
 Richard K Brock
 Chief Financial Officer of PLM Financial Services, Inc.
 (Principal Financial Officer)
 May 14, 2004
### §2165. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–437, title I, §101(e), Oct. 20, 2008, 122 Stat. 4985

Section, Pub. L. 90–264, title III, §301, Mar. 12, 1968, 82 Stat. 46; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §221(16), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1750, related to Capitol educational and informational center and information and distribution stations and operation agreements.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 831 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.
<PAGE>
                               [LETTERHEAD OF STI]

                                 August 6, 2004



VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS                                  PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL

Mr. Martin S. McDermut
928 El Rancho Road
Santa Barbara, CA 93108

Dear Mr. McDermut:

        This letter is to inform you that, subject to your agreement to the
undertakings described below, Superconductor Technologies Inc. ("STI") intends,
to the maximum extent permitted by the Bylaws of STI (as restricted by
applicable law), to advance your reasonable defense expenses (including
attorneys' fees) incurred in connection with the following litigations
(including any related litigations which are subsequently filed) brought in the
United States District Court for the Central District of California (the
"Actions"):

        Backhaus v. Superconductor Technologies Inc.., et al., CV 04-2680
        Goldfine v. Superconductor Technologies Inc.., et al., CV 04-2848
        Alvarez v. Superconductor Technologies Inc.., et al., CV 04-2927

        This letter is also intended to confirm that you in good faith believe
that you meet the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification under
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law - that to the extent of your
involvement in any matters that are the subject of any of the Actions, you acted
in good faith and in a manner you reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to
the best interests of STI. Section 145(e) and STI's Bylaws require that, should
it ultimately be determined that you are not entitled to be indemnified by STI
as authorized by those provisions, any advance payments made by STI on your
behalf in connection with any of the Actions as to which such a determination is
made must be repaid by you to STI.

        Accordingly, you undertake to repay all amounts paid or reimbursed by
STI on your behalf in connection with the Actions if it shall ultimately be
determined that, with respect to the subject matter of the Actions, you are not
entitled to be indemnified. You further agree that, by advancing defense
expenses on your behalf, STI does not waive or limit any right to recoupment of
such expenses from any insurance policies which may be applicable. STI
acknowledges that you are not waiving any rights you may have to indemnification
under applicable corporate, employment or other laws.

        Please acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing by signing and
returning the enclosed copy of this letter.



                                              Very truly yours,
                                              SUPERCONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                                              a Delaware corporation

                                              By: M. Peter Thomas
Acknowledged and agreed:

                                              Date:
------------------------------------               -----------------------------
Martin S. McDermut
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Marjorie O. Thomas, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K, as amended by this Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A, of RealNetworks, Inc.; and


2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: April 30, 2015








/s/ Marjorie O. Thomas


Marjorie O. Thomas


Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit
      3.50.1




**CERTIFICATE
      OF AMENDMENT OF**




**CERTIFICATE
      OF INCORPORATION OF**




**BUILDING
      MATERIALS HOLDING CORPORATION**







Building
      Materials
      Holding Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
      the
      State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), pursuant to the provisions of the General
      Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "GCL"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY as
      follows:




FIRST:
      The
      Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended by deleting
      the first two sentences of ARTICLE FOURTH of the Certificate of Incorporation
      in
      their present form and substituting therefor as the first two sentences of
      ARTICLE FOURTH the following two sentences:




“This
      Corporation
      is authorized to issue two classes of stock, designated “Common Stock”, $0.001
      par value, and “Preferred Stock”, $0.001 par value. The total number of shares
      of all classes of stock which the Corporation has authority to issue is
      Fifty-two Million (52,000,000), consisting of Fifty Million (50,000,000) shares
      of Common Stock and Two Million (2,000,000) shares of Preferred
      Stock.”




SECOND:
      The
      amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation set forth
      in
      this Certificate of Amendment has been duly adopted in accordance with the
      provisions of Section 242 of the GCL, (a) the Board of Directors of
      the Corporation having duly adopted a resolution setting forth such amendment
      and declaring its advisability and submitting it to the stockholders of the
      Corporation for their approval, and (b) the stockholders of the Corporation
      having duly adopted such amendment by a vote of the holders of a majority of
      the
      outstanding stock entitled to vote thereon at the Corporation's May 3, 2005
      annual meeting of stockholders.




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, Building Materials Holding Corporation has caused this
      Certificate to be executed and acknowledged by its duly authorized officer
      this
      24th day of February, 2006.




**BUILDING
              MATERIALS HOLDING
              CORPORATION**By:
            /s/ Paul
              S. StreetPaul
              S.
              StreetSenior
                Vice
                President and Secretary
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-002 January 8, 2002 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: OPA1@NRC.GOV

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC SPECIAL INSPECTION TEAM TO REPORT ON REVIEW RELATED

TO LOSS OF SPENT FUEL RODS AT MILLSTONE UNIT 1 NUCLEAR PLANT

 The results of an NRC special team inspection stemming from the loss of two spent fuel rods at

the Millstone Unit 1 nuclear power plant in Waterford, Conn., will be presented at a meeting open for

public observation on Tuesday, January 15. The inspection exit meeting will begin at 3 p.m. at the

Leland F. Sillin Training Center, near the entrance to the Millstone facility.

 The NRC staff will remain after the meeting to answer questions from members of the public.

 Last October, the NRC dispatched a special inspection team to the plant to evaluate the

comprehensiveness of an investigation conducted by the plantís previous owner, Northeast Utilities

(NU), into the possible whereabouts of the rods and the circumstances surrounding their loss. The

four-member NRC team spent several weeks on-site and, among other things, reviewed the companyís

root-cause analysis.

 The results of NUís investigation were provided to the NRC in early October 2001 by Dominion

Nuclear, the company that currently owns and operates Millstone. (Millstone Unit 1 is permanently

shutdown, but Units 2 and 3 remain in operation.) In its report, NU concluded that although the exact

location of the rods could not be determined, itís likely they are at one or more of four sites: two lowlevel radioactive waste disposal sites -- one in Barnwell, S.C., the other in Hanford, Wash. -- and two

spent fuel pools -- the Millstone 1 pool and one at a General Electric facility in Vallecitos, Calif.

 NU first reported to the NRC that it could not account for two spent fuel rods, which had been

stored in the Millstone 1 pool, on December 15, 2000. Company records indicated that the rods were

last verified to be in the pool in 1980, but there was no documentation of their presence in the pool

beyond that time.

 Ever since the notification by NU, the NRC has been closely following the companyís efforts to

find the missing rods through on-site inspections and periodic conference calls. In addition, the agency

has maintained a liaison with the appropriate states.
 Neither the companies nor the NRC believe the material was stolen. There are significant

radiological security controls at nuclear power plants such as Millstone that would make such a theft

dangerous, difficult and highly unlikely. The NRC does not believe that a public health and safety

problem exists based on the likely locations of the spent fuel rods. Furthermore, the rods would not

pose any risk of being used for nuclear weapons due to their low uranium and plutonium content.

 ###