alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-22910-CIV-ALTONAGA/Goodman

ANA I. ROSQUETE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, 

LTD., 

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Defendant’s Notice of Settlement [ECF No. 

43], filed on March 8, 2021. The Court having carefully reviewed the file, and being otherwise 

fully advised, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The above-styled action remains CLOSED without prejudice to the parties to file a 

stipulation for dismissal within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order. 

2. If the parties fail to complete the expected settlement, either party may request the 

Court to reopen the case. 

3. Any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 9th day of March, 2021.

 _________________________________

 CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 1:20-cv-22910-CMA Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2021 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2366]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, Review of Conference Grants (R13s).
    Date: March 16, 2004.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIEHS/National Institutes of Health, Building 4401, East 
Campus, 79 T.W. Alexander Drive, 122, Research Triangle Park, NC 
27709 (Telephone conference call).
    Contact Person: RoseAnne McGee, Associate Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Office of Program 
Operations, Division of Extramural Research and Training, Nat. Inst. 
of Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-30, Research 
Triangle Park, NC 27709. 919-541-0752.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.115, 
Biometry and Risk Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental 
Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety 
Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic 
Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower Development 
in the Environmental Health Sciences; 93.113, Biological Response to 
Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied Toxicological Research 
and Testing, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 28, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-2366 Filed 2-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
### §6319. Transportation of official records and papers to a Senator's State

#### (a) Payment of reasonable transportation expenses

Upon request of a Senator, amounts in the appropriation account "Miscellaneous Items" within the contingent fund of the Senate shall be available to pay the reasonable expenses of sending or transporting the official records and papers of the Senator from the District of Columbia to any location designated by such Senator in the State represented by the Senator.

#### (b) Sending and transportation

The Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate shall provide for the most economical means of sending or transporting the official records and papers under this section while ensuring the orderly and timely delivery of the records and papers to the location specified by the Senator.

#### (c) Oversight

The Committee on Rules and Administration shall have the authority to issue rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of this section.

#### (d) Official records defined

In this section, the term "official records and papers" means books, records, papers, and official files which could be sent as franked mail.

#### (e) Effective date

This section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2005 and each succeeding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 108–447, div. G, title I, §7, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3170.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 59d–1 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2005, which is div. G of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005.
**Exhibit 12.1**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Rodrigo Cruz Matta, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Distribución y Servicio D&S S.A.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us and others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the“Evaluation Date”); and  (c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controlsand procedures which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;
 

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whetheror not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses.
/s/ Rodrigo Cruz Matta
Rodrigo Cruz Matta
### §§871 to 878. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–300, title I, §184(a)(1), Oct. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1357

Section 871, Pub. L. 93–203, title III, §301, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1960, related to special programs and activities.

A prior section 871, Pub. L. 93–203, title III, §301, Dec. 28, 1973, 87 Stat. 857, provided for additional manpower services, prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 872, Pub. L. 93–203, title III, §302, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1962, related to Native American employment and training programs.

A prior section 872, Pub. L. 93–203, title III, §302, Dec. 28, 1973, 87 Stat. 858; Pub. L. 95–93, title III, §303(a)–(d), Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 650, related to Native American employment and training programs, prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 873, Pub. L. 93–203, title III, §303, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1964; amended Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §508(h)(3), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 693, related to migrant and seasonal farmworker employment and training programs.

A prior section 873, Pub. L. 93–203, title III, §303, Dec. 28, 1973, 87 Stat. 859, related to migrant and seasonal farmworker manpower programs, prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 874, Pub. L. 93–203, title III, §304, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1965, related to job search and relocation assistance.

A prior section 874, Pub. L. 93–203, title III, §304, Dec. 28, 1973, 87 Stat. 859, provided for youth programs and other special programs, prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 875, Pub. L. 93–203, title III, §305, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1965; amended Pub. L. 96–583, §3(d), Dec. 23, 1980, 94 Stat. 3376, related to veterans information and outreach.

A prior section 875, Pub. L. 93–203, title III, §306, Dec. 28, 1973, 87 Stat. 860, related to a consultation with Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in former section 803 of this title prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 876, Pub. L. 93–203, title III, §306, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1965, related to programs for the handicapped.

A prior section 306 of Pub. L. 93–203, title III, Dec. 28, 1973, 87 Stat. 860, related to a consultation with Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, was classified to former section 875 of this title prior to the general revision of Pub. L. 93–203 by Pub. L. 95–524.

Section 877, Pub. L. 93–203, title III, §307, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1966, related to partnership programs between prime sponsors and employment security agencies.

Section 878, Pub. L. 93–203, title III, §308, as added Pub. L. 95–524, §2, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1966, related to projects for middle-aged and older workers.
### §60a–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 60a–1 was editorially reclassified as section 4571 of this title.
#### § 146.5 [Reserved]
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60526

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EVAN DOSS, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Mississippi

(5:97-CR-1 BrN & 5:97-CR-3 BrN)

June 29, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Evan Doss, Jr. appeals his convictions for embezzlement and money

laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 666(a)(1)(A), 1956(a)(1)(B)(I), contending

that the district court (1) erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment for

lack of subject matter jurisdiction, (2) abused its discretion in failing to grant his

May 14, 1997 motion for continuance, and (3) excluded the testimony of two

defense witnessesin violation of hissixth amendment right to compulsory process.
 

1 United States v. Moeller, 987 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir. 1993).

 

2 United States v. Correa-Ventura, 6 F.3d 1070 (5th Cir. 1993).

 

3 United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal, 458 U.S. 858 (1982).

 

4 United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc); United States v.

James, 528 F.2d 999 (5th Cir. 1976).

2

For the first time on appeal, Doss also contends that the district court erred in

changing venue from the Western Division of the Southern District of Mississippi

to the Jackson Division thereof.

Our review of the record, briefs, and authorities persuades that no reversible

error was committed. The district court did not err in denying Doss’s motion to

dismiss the indictment for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.1 Nor did it abuse its

broad discretion in denying Doss a continuance.

2

 Despite suggestions to the

contrary, the district court did not exclude the testimony of two defense witnesses

in violation of Doss’s sixth amendment right to compulsory process.3 Finally, the

district court did not err, plainly or otherwise, in transferring this case.4

AFFIRMED.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-47 June 29, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING NEAR SUSQUEHANNA NUCLEAR PLANT

ON CHANGES IN REACTOR OVERSIGHT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a public meeting for Tuesday, July 11, in

Berwick, Pa., to discuss the agency’s new reactor oversight process. The process was initiated in April

at the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station and other commercial nuclear power plants nationwide.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. at the Berwick Golf Club, 3095 Martzville Road, in Berwick.

Members of the public will have the opportunity to ask questions of NRC staff during and after the

meeting.

The new oversight process uses more objective, timely and safety-significant criteria in

assessing performance while seeking to more effectively and efficiently regulate the industry. Under

the new process, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional office-based personnel are

supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance indicators. These

performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant operations, including the viability of

redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection and security measures.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC’s web site every three months. The safety significance of each inspection finding or performance

indicator is characterized by a color -- green, white, yellow or red.

The NRC response to the inspection finding and performance indicators will be based on the

significance of the items. A green finding receives normal NRC oversight, while white, yellow or red

assessments receive increasing NRC involvement. Multiple red findings could result in a plant

shutdown.

A plain language summary of the reactor oversight process is available from the NRC Office of

Public Affairs or on the web site at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm

Detailed information regarding the reactor oversight process is available on the web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html

#
§ 123.11 Supplies on international trains. ( a ) *Articles acquired abroad.* Articles subject to internal revenue tax and other merchandise acquired abroad constituting supplies arriving on international trains crossing and recrossing the boundary line, for which the train crew elects not to file an inventory as provided for in paragraph (b) of this section, shall be subject to duty and tax unless locked or sealed in a separate compartment or locker upon arrival, and the lock or seal remains unbroken until the train departs from the United States at the final port of exit.
( b ) *Inventory procedure.* Supplies acquired abroad for which internal revenue stamps are not required may be used in the United States under the following procedure: ( 1 ) *Port of arrival.* An inventory executed in duplicate consisting of an itemized list showing the kind and quantity of each class of supplies on hand in the car with space for a parallel column in which to show at the port of exit the quantity used, shall be certified by the person in charge of the car and furnished to the Customs officer upon arrival. The Customs officer shall certify the correctness of both copies of the inventory, return the original to the person in charge of the car and retain the duplicate, or forward it to the port of exit if this differs from the port of arrival.
( 2 ) *Port of exit.* Upon arrival at the port of exit, the inventory returned at the port of arrival to the person in charge of the car shall be submitted to the Customs officer after completion by showing the quantity of each item used in the United States, and being certified by the person in charge of the car. Entries must be filed and applicable duties and taxes paid at the port of exit on the quantity of supplies consumed in the United States.
( c ) *Supplies purchased in the United States.* Supplies purchased in the United States shall be passed free of duty without inventory or entry.
§ 148.102 Flat rate of duty. ( a ) *Generally.* The rate of duty on articles accompanying any person, including a crewmember, arriving in the United States (exclusive of duty-free articles and articles acquired in American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or the Virgin Islands of the United States) shall be 4 percent, effective January 1, 2001, and 3 percent, effective January 1, 2002, of the fair retail value in the country of acquisition.
( b ) *American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands.* The rate of duty on articles accompanying any person, including a crewmember, arriving in the United States directly or indirectly from American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or the Virgin Islands of the United States (exclusive of duty-free articles), acquired in these locations as an incident of the person's physical presence there, shall be 2 percent, effective January 1, 2001, and 1.5 percent, effective January 1, 2002, of the fair retail value in the location in which acquired.
[T.D. 01-61, 66 FR 46218, Sept. 4, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.204 Imported directly. In order to be eligible for duty-free treatment under the ATPA, an article shall be imported directly from a beneficiary country into the customs territory of the United States. For purposes of this requirement, the words “imported directly” mean: ( a ) Direct shipment from any beneficiary country to the United States without passing through the territory of any non-beneficiary country; or
( b ) If shipment from any beneficiary country to the United States was through the territory of a non-beneficiary country, the articles in the shipment did not enter into the commerce of the non-beneficiary country while en route to the United States, and the invoices, bills of lading, and other shipping documents show the United States as the final destination; or
( c ) If shipment from any beneficiary country to the United States was through the territory of a non-beneficiary country and the invoices and other documents do not show the United States as the final destination, then the articles in the shipment, upon arrival in the United States, are imported directly only if they: ( 1 ) Remained under the control of the customs authority in the intermediate country;
( 2 ) Did not enter into the commerce of the intermediate country except for the purpose of sale other than at retail, and the articles are imported into the United States as a result of the original commercial transaction between the importer and the producer or the latter's sales agent; and
( 3 ) Were not subjected to operations in the intermediate country other than loading and unloading, and other activities necessary to preserve the articles in good condition.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 759 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the credit for 

production of refined coal. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 16, 2021 

Mr. HOEVEN (for himself and Mr. CRAMER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the credit for production of refined coal. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF REFINED COAL PRODUCTION 

4 TAX CREDIT. 

5 (a) EXTENSION OF PERIOD DURING WHICH RE6 FINED COAL CAN BE PRODUCED.—Section 45(e)(8) of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 

8 at the end the following new subparagraph: 

9 ‘‘(E) EXTENSION OF CREDIT PERIOD FOR

10 CERTAIN REFINED COAL FACILITIES.—In the 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 759 IS

1 case of a refined coal production facility which 

2 does not produce steel industry fuel and which 

3 is placed in service before January 1, 2012, 

4 clauses (i) and (ii)(II) of subparagraph (A) 

5 shall each be applied by substituting ‘20-year 

6 period’ for ‘10-year period’.’’. 

7 (b) EXTENSION OF PERIOD DURING WHICH RE8 FINED COAL FACILITIES CAN BE QUALIFIED.—Subpara9 graph (B) of section 45(d)(8) of the Internal Revenue 

10 Code of 1986 is amended— 

11 (1) by striking ‘‘placed in service after’’ and in12 serting ‘‘placed in service— 

13 ‘‘(i) after’’; 

14 (2) by striking the period at the end and insert15 ing ‘‘, or’’; and 

16 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

17 clause: 

18 ‘‘(ii) after December 31, 2020, and 

19 before January 1, 2024.’’. 

20 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

21 this section shall apply to coal produced and sold after 

22 the date of the enactment of this Act, in taxable years 

23 ending after such date. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.776 Indirect materials.

Indirect materials are to be disregarded in determining whether a good qualifies as an originating good under § 10.770 of this subpart and General Note 27, HTSUS, except that the cost of such indirect materials may be included in meeting the value-content requirement specified in § 10.770(b) of this subpart.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. 5th Ave. and 43rd Street Building Corporation et al., Appellants, against James J. Sexton et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondents.

Ho opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 1, 2018

No. 04-18-00256-CV

Jael RIVERA,

Appellant

v.

Gabriel FIGUEROA,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-03465

Honorable Rosie Alvarado, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellee has filed a motion for extension of time to file his brief, requesting an extension 

of sixty days. We GRANT the motion. Appellee’s brief is due September 28, 2018. NO 

FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of August, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
#### §§ 16.171-16.999 [Reserved]