alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<page>                        EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter World
Currency Fund L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:  /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:	   Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:  President

Date:   August 14, 2003
§ 171.1 Petition for relief. ( a ) *To whom addressed.* Petitions for the remission or mitigation of a fine, penalty, or forfeiture incurred under any law administered by Customs must be addressed to the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer designated in the notice of claim.
( b ) *Signature.* For commercial violations, the petition for remission or mitigation must be signed by the petitioner, his attorney-at-law or a Customs broker. If the petitioner is a corporation, the petition may be signed by an officer or responsible supervisory official of the corporation, or a responsible employee representative of the corporation. Electronic signatures are acceptable. In non-commercial violations, a non-English speaking petitioner or petitioner who has a disability which may impede his ability to file a petition may enlist a family member or other representative to file a petition on his behalf. The deciding Customs officer may, in his or her discretion, require proof of representation before consideration of any petition.
( c ) *Form.* The petition for remission or mitigation need not be in any particular form. Customs can require that the petition and any documents submitted in support of the petition be in English or be accompanied by an English translation. The petition must set forth the following: ( 1 ) A description of the property involved (if a seizure);
( 2 ) The date and place of the violation or seizure;
( 3 ) The facts and circumstances relied upon by the petitioner to justify remission or mitigation; and
( 4 ) If a seizure case, proof of a petitionable interest in the seized property.
( d ) *False statement in petition.* A false statement contained in a petition may subject the petitioner to prosecution under the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 1001.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 13, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1222

Lower Tribunal No. 20-31235 CC

________________

ASG Operations, LLC,

Appellant,

vs.

FSM Office LLC,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael G. 

Barket, Judge.

Keith D. Silverstein, P.A., and Keith D. Silverstein, for appellant.

Greenberg Traurig, P.A., and Jay A. Yagoda and Katherine M. 

Clemente, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and HENDON and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 141

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 141.37 Additional requirements for nonresident corporations.

If a nonresident corporation has not qualified to conduct business under state law in the state in which Customs district the agent is empowered to perform the delegated authority, the power of attorney shall be supported by documentation establishing the authority of the grantor designated to execute the power of attorney on behalf of the corporation.

[T.D. 84-93, 49 FR 17754, Apr. 25, 1984]
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.



SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002



We, Richard E. Stoddard, Chief Executive Officer and James F. Verhey, Chief Financial Officer of Kaiser Ventures LLC (the
Company), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2004 (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                         
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: April 14, 2005 |  | /s/ Richard E. Stoddard                 
|                     |  | Richard E. Stoddard                     
|                     |  | Chairman of the Board, President & CEO  
|                     | 
|                     |  | /s/ James F. Verhey                     
|                     |  | James F. Verhey                         
|                     |  | Executive Vice President - CFO          
|                     |  | Principal Financial & Accounting Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 141
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 141.56 Single entry summary for multiple transportation entries consigned to the same consignee. ( a ) *Requirement.* CBP may accept, either at the port of entry or electronically one entry summary for consumption or for warehouse for merchandise covered by multiple entries for immediate transportation, subject to the requirements of § 142.17(a) of this chapter, provided the merchandise covered by each immediate transportation entry is released at the port of destination under a separate entry, in accordance with § 142.3 of this chapter.
( b ) *Limitation.* A single entry summary for multiple transportation entries shall not be accepted for any merchandise listed in § 142.17(b) of this chapter.
( c ) *Information on the entry summary.* Each entry for immediate transportation shall be identified separately on the entry summary by the immediate transportation entry number and the corresponding entry number.
[T.D. 79-221, 44 FR 46817, Aug. 9, 1979]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Morris Skolnick, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
#### Benjamin Korobkin, Respondent, v. Public Farms Products, Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Martin, P. J., and Townley, J., dissent and vote to reverse and dismiss the complaint.
### §1862a. Use of construction project funds to reimburse Capitol Police for related overtime costs

#### (a) Payment of overtime costs

The Architect of the Capitol shall transfer amounts made available for construction projects during a fiscal year to the applicable appropriations accounts of the United States Capitol Police in order to reimburse the Capitol Police for overtime costs incurred in connection with such projects.

#### (b) Effective date

This section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2013 and each succeeding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 112–74, div. G, title I, §1201, Dec. 23, 2011, 125 Stat. 1128.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2012, which is div. G of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012.
```

[106th Congress Public Law 347]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ347.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 1357]]

Public Law 106-347
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the post office and courthouse located at 2 Federal Square, 
    Newark, New Jersey, as the ``Frank R. Lautenberg Post Office and 
          Courthouse''. <<NOTE: Oct. 23, 2000 -  [H.R. 4975]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The post office and courthouse located at 2 Federal Square, Newark, 
New Jersey, shall be known and designated as the ``Frank R. Lautenberg 
Post Office and Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the post office and courthouse referred 
to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Frank R. 
Lautenberg Post Office and Courthouse''.

    Approved October 23, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4975:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Sept. 19, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
### §61d–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 61d–2 was editorially reclassified as section 6653 of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 61d–2, Pub. L. 94–303, title I, §114, June 1, 1976, 90 Stat. 614, authorized a postage allowance for Chaplain of Senate, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 97–51, §127(b)(2), Oct. 1, 1981, 95 Stat. 966.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Samuel D. Johnson for Admission to the Bar.

On application of the petitioner, the committee on character making no objection, this matter is referred back to said committee, without thereby intending to disapprove of its present report. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ.
§ 148.51 Special exemption for personal or household articles. ( a ) *Application of exemption.* The exemption from duty and internal revenue tax contemplated by section 321(a)(2)(B), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(B)), may be applied to articles for his personal or household use including gifts, but not for any business or commercial use, accompanying: ( 1 ) A nonresident arriving in the United States who is not entitled to an exemption for gifts under subheading 9804.00.30 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) (19 U.S.C. 1202) (see § 148.44); or
( 2 ) A returning resident who is not entitled to the $800 or $1,600 exemption for articles acquired abroad under subheading 9804.00.65, 9804.00.70 or 9804.00.72, HTSUS (see Subpart D of this part).
( b ) *Limitations.* No article accompanying a person arriving in the United States will be exempted from duty or internal revenue tax under section 321(a)(2)(B), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, if any article accompanying such person is subject to duty or tax by reason of the following limitations on the application of this exemption: ( 1 ) *Value of articles.* The exemption shall be allowed only when the aggregate fair retail value of all articles not otherwise entitled to an exemption does not exceed $200.
( 2 ) *Articles subject to internal revenue tax.* The exemption will not be applied to articles subject to internal revenue tax other than: ( i ) Cigarettes not in excess of 50;
( ii ) Cigars not in excess of 10;
( iii ) Alcoholic beverages not in excess of 150 milliliters; or
( iv ) Alcoholic perfumery not in excess of 150 milliliters; or
( c ) *Family grouping.* Family grouping of the exemption shall not be allowed.
[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 148.51, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 14, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq*. (“the Act”), IPC—Association Connecting Electronics Industries (“IPC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

                    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: IPC—Association Connecting Electronics Industries, Bannockburn, IL. The nature and scope of IPC's standards development activities are: design and performance standards for all types of interconnections, including printed wiring boards, flexible circuits, flat cable and discrete wiring devices. In addition, IPC develops standards for materials used in these products. Also, IPC is involved in standards for computer-aided technology, used to define electronic description. IPC is therefore also involved not only in the development of product standards, but in standardization and in guidelines                           ( print page 61869)                        that will impact the electronic packaging community.                

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-23516  Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410—11—M
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the following Registration Statements of OMNI Energy Services Corp. of our report dated March 12, 2004, except as to Notes 1, 11, and 13 as they relate to 2003 for which the date is July 29, 2005, with respect to the 2003
consolidated financial statements of OMNI Energy Services Corp. included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.



| |  |  | Form S-3/A No. 333-115040 (OMNI Energy Services Corp. Registration Statement)
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Form S-8 No. 333-110198 (Amended and Restated OMNI Energy Services Corp. Stock Incentive Plan)
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Form S-8 No. 333-49409 (OMNI Energy Services Corp. Stock Incentive Plan and Stock Option Agreements with Certain Employees)
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Form S-8 No. 333-80973 (OMNI Energy Services Corp. 1999 Stock Option Plan Stock Incentive Plan)
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Form S-8 No. 333-35816 (OMNI Energy Services Corp. 1999 Stock Option Plan)
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Form S-3 No. 333-69436 (OMNI Energy Services Corp. Registration Statement)
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Form S-1 No. 333-129138 (OMNI Energy Services Corp. General Form for Registration Securities)
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Form S-1 No. 333-131696 (OMNI Energy Services Corp. General Form for Registration Securities)
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/S/    FITTS, ROBERTS & CO., P.C.

Houston, Texas

March 31, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            2005
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,942,614
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,944,619
<PP&E>                                      93,162,180
<DEPRECIATION>                              41,490,675
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,616,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,944,619
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  51,671,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,616,124
<SALES>                                      2,216,319
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,216,319
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  273,705
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               181,944
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (2005)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,762,675
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,762,675
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,762,675
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.299
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.299


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.746 Corrected claim or supporting statement.

An importer who makes a corrected claim under § 10.723(b) of this subpart will not be subject to civil or administrative penalties under 19 U.S.C. 1592 for having made an incorrect claim or having submitted an incorrect supporting statement, provided that the corrected claim or supporting statement is promptly and voluntarily made pursuant to the terms set forth in § 10.747 of this subpart.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (i)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
 Dated: August 10, 2005/s/ Jeffrey L. KarafaJeffrey L. KarafaTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer,Dearborn Bancorp, Inc.
 38
### §144. Separability

If any provision of this chapter, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, the remainder of this chapter, or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby.

(June 23, 1947, ch. 120, title V, §503, 61 Stat. 162.)
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-38 April 9, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC STAFF, WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER OFFICIALS

TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

officials of Washington Hospital Center on Monday, April 13, to

discuss nine apparent violations of NRC requirements for

controlling and handling radioactive waste. The predecisional

enforcement conference, which begins at 10:00 a.m., will be held

in the Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa. It is open to the

public for observation.

The apparent violations were found during a February

inspection of the hospital. Those apparent violations include:

unauthorized disposal of waste through incineration, loss of

control of radioactive waste, and failure to perform required

radiological surveys.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference

does not mean that the NRC has determined that a violation has

occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the

purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and

safety significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to

point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC

inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline its

proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this

conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials

at a later time.

#
#### In the Matter of the Application of Claude F. Curtis, Appellant, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against Henry Moskowitz and Others, Commissioners, Composing the Municpal Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, etc., Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.868 Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment. ( a ) *General.* If the importer fails to comply with any requirement under this subpart, including submission of a complete declaration under § 10.864 of this subpart, when requested, the Center director may deny preferential tariff treatment to the imported good.
( b ) *Failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment.* Where the requirements for preferential tariff treatment set forth elsewhere in this subpart are met, the Center director nevertheless may deny preferential treatment to a good if the good is shipped through or transshipped in the territory of a country other than a Party, and the importer of the good does not provide, at the request of the Center director, evidence demonstrating to the satisfaction of the Center director that the good was imported directly from the territory of a Party into the territory of the other Party (*see* § 10.880 of this subpart).
§ 147.13 Transfer to fair building. ( a ) *Immediate delivery.* The provisions governing immediate delivery in part 142 of this chapter are applicable to articles for a fair.
( b ) *After entry.* Upon the entry being made, a permit may be issued by the port director for the transfer of the articles covered thereby to the buildings in which they are to be exhibited or used, or, in his discretion, to the public stores for examination and subsequent delivery to the buildings in which they are to be exhibited or used.
[T.D. 70-134, 35 FR 9268, June 13, 1970, as amended by T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17470, July 2, 1973]