alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

Case No.: 20-CV-61588-RKA

LUZ MARTINEZ,

Plaintiff,

 

vs. 

TOTAL SOLUTION PROFESSIONAL 

SERVICES INC., a Florida 

Profit Corporation, and 

AVIHU ZABATANI,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND TO DEEM STATEMENT OF CLAIM 

TIMELY FILED

Plaintiff, LUZ MARTINEZ (“Ms. Martinez” or “Plaintiff”), by and through the 

undersigned attorneys, pursuant to the Rule 6(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., files this Motion for Extension 

of Time and to Deem Plaintiff’s Statement of Claim, attached hereto as Exhibit “1,” timely filed. 

In support thereof, Plaintiff states:

Plaintiff filed her initial Complaint on August 5, 2020. The time for filing an answer or 

other pleadings has not expired. In fact, no appearance has been made by the Defendants. 

Therefore, Defendants will suffer no prejudice by the granting of this Motion.

Pursuant to this Court’s FLSA Order [DE 4], Plaintiff was to file a Statement of Claim on 

August 21, 2020. An inadvertent scheduling error prevented Plaintiff from timely doing so. 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 6(b), the Court may grant an extension of time to a party upon the 

showing of excusable neglect. Plaintiff is promptly moving for this extension after discovering the 

error, and Plaintiff’s Statement of Claim is attached to this Motion. 

Case 0:20-cv-61588-RKA Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/24/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

This motion is filed for good cause and not to unnecessarily extend the time for the 

submission of Plaintiff’s attached Statement of Claim. Defendants will suffer no prejudice through 

the granting of this Motion. 

Respectfully Submitted on this 24th day of August 2020.

Pike & Lustig, LLP

/s/ Daniel Lustig 

Daniel Lustig 

Florida Bar No.: 059225 

Robert C. Johnson

Florida Bar No.: 116419

1209 N. Olive Ave. 

West Palm Beach, FL 33401 

Telephone: (561) 855-7585 

Facsimile: (561) 855-7710 

Email: pleadings@pikelustig.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 24th day of August 2020, I caused a true and correct copy of 

the foregoing to be served via EM/ECF.

/s/ Daniel Lustig 

Daniel Lustig

Case 0:20-cv-61588-RKA Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/24/2020 Page 2 of 2
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-166 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, November 22, 1996)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) will hold a

technical meeting on December 3, in Rockville, Md.

The meeting of the ACRS Subcommittee on Human Factors is

open to the public. It will begin at 8:30 a.m. in Room T-2B3,

11545 Rockville Pike.

The subcommittee will review the activities of the Office

for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data, and the Office

of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards associated with the

Human Performance Program Plan. It will also discuss staff

responses to the questions raised at its September 20 meeting.

Other aspects of the meeting, including the opportunity for

public comment, are described in a Notice of Meeting published in

the November 19 edition of the Federal Register.

#
§ 147.215 What must I include in my drug-free awareness program? You must establish an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about— ( a ) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
( b ) Your policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
( c ) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and
( d ) The penalties that you may impose upon them for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23736]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1561-DR]


Florida; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida (FEMA-1561-DR), dated September 26, 2004, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 14, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 26, 2004:

    Brevard, Citrus, DeSoto, Glades, Hardee, Hendry, Hernando, 
Highlands, Indian River, Lake, Levy, Manatee, Marion, Martin, 
Okeechobee, Orange, Osceola, Palm Beach, Pasco, Polk, Seminole, St. 
Lucie, Sumter, and Volusia Counties for Public Assistance 
[Categories C-G] (already designated for Individual Assistance and 
Public Assistance [Categories A and B], including direct Federal 
assistance, at 100 percent Federal funding of the total eligible 
costs for a period of up to 72 hours.)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-23736 Filed 10-21-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
### §§190i to 190k. Repealed. S. Res. 274, §2(b), Nov. 14, 1979

Section 190i, Pub. L. 91–510, title II, §243, Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1173, related to actions and procedures of the Committee on Appropriations of Senate. See Standing Rules of the Senate.

Section 190j, Pub. L. 91–510, title II, §252(a), Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1173; Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, §302(d), as added Pub. L. 95–110, §1, Sept. 20, 1977, 91 Stat. 884, related to cost estimates in reports of Senate committees accompanying certain legislative measures and to other Senate committee operations. See Standing Rules of the Senate.

Section 190k, Pub. L. 91–510, title II, §253(a), (b), Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1174, related to appropriations on an annual basis for continuing programs and activities and review by Senate and joint committees. See Standing Rules of the Senate.
### §393. Filing of pleadings, motions, depositions, appendixes, briefs, and other papers

(a) Filings of pleadings, motions, depositions, appendixes, briefs, and other papers shall be accomplished by:

(1) delivering a copy thereof to the Clerk of the House of Representatives at his office in Washington, District of Columbia, or to a member of his staff at such office; or

(2) mailing a copy thereof, by registered or certified mail, addressed to the Clerk at the House of Representatives, Washington, District of Columbia: Provided, That if such copy is not actually received, another copy shall be filed within a reasonable time; and

(3) delivering or mailing, simultaneously with the delivery or mailing of a copy thereof under paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection, such additional copies as the committee may by rule prescribe.

(b) All papers filed with the Clerk pursuant to this chapter shall be promptly transmitted by him to the committee.

(Pub. L. 91–138, §14, Dec. 5, 1969, 83 Stat. 289.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to any general or special election for Representative in, or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress of the United States occurring after Dec. 5, 1969, see section 19 of Pub. L. 91–138, set out as a note under section 381 of this title.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)
**Title:****Annual report, fy...**
 
2003 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc:ID 1.27:G 94/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000635262
 
October 27, 2017
§ 113.22 Witnesses required. ( a ) *Generally.* The signature of each party to a bond executed by a noncorporate principal or surety must be witnessed by two persons, who must sign their names as witnesses, and include their addresses.
( b ) *Witness for both principal and surety.* When two persons signing as witnesses act for both principal and surety, they must so indicate by stating on the bond “as to both”.
( c ) *Corporate principal or surety.* No witnesses are required where bonds are executed by properly authorized officers or agents of a corporate principal or corporate surety. For requirements concerning the execution of a bond by an authorized officer or agent of a corporate principal or surety, see §§ 113.33 and 113.37 of this part.
[T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41171, Oct. 19, 1984, as amended by CBP Dec. 15-15, 80 FR 70164, Nov. 13, 2015]
### §566. Employee drug and alcohol abuse assistance programs

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary of Labor shall establish a program through which the Secretary shall provide grants to, or enter into contracts with, employers to enable such employers to develop employee drug and alcohol abuse assistance programs.

#### (b) Applications

Employers desiring to receive a grant or contract under this section shall submit to the Secretary of Labor, an application, in such form and containing such information as the Secretary may require.

#### (c) Regulations

The Secretary of Labor shall promulgate regulations necessary to carry out this section.

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section, $4,000,000 for fiscal year 1989, and $5,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1990 and 1991.

(Pub. L. 100–690, title II, §2101, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4216.)
### §504. Mass mailings by Senate offices; quarterly statements; publication of summary tabulations

Two weeks after the close of each calendar quarter, or as soon as practicable thereafter, the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate shall send to each Senate office a statement of the cost of postage and paper and of the other operating expenses incurred as a result of mass mailings processed for such Senate office during such quarter. The statement shall separately identify the cost of postage and paper and other costs, and shall distinguish the costs attributable to newsletters and all other mass mailings. The statement shall also include the total cost per capita in the State. A compilation of all such statements shall be sent to the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration. A summary tabulation of such information shall be published quarterly in the Congressional Record and included in the semiannual report of the Secretary of the Senate. Such summary tabulation shall set forth for each Senate office the following information: the Senate office's name, the total number of pieces of mass mail mailed during the quarter, the total cost of such mail, and, in the case of Senators, the cost of such mail divided by the total population of the State from which the Senator was elected, and the total number of pieces of mass mail divided by the total population of the State from which the Senator was elected, and in the case of each Senator, the allocation made to such Senator from the appropriation for official mail expenses.

(Pub. L. 101–520, title III, §318, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2283; Pub. L. 103–283, title I, §3(b), July 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 1427.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 59f of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1991.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–283 inserted before period at end ", and in the case of each Senator, the allocation made to such Senator from the appropriation for official mail expenses".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Pub. L. 103–283, title I, §3(c), July 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 1427, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section and section 4108 of this title] shall be effective with respect to—

"(1) reports and statements covering periods beginning on and after October 1, 1994; and

"(2) appropriations made and obligations incurred on and after such date."
#### Audriel CAHUE-ANGUIANO, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 01-70886.

INS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*701Submitted May 18, 2002 *.

Decided May 29, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, WARDLAW, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Audriel Cahue-Anguiano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeal’s (“BIA”) order dismissing an appeal of the Immigration Judge’s decision denying his motion to terminate removal proceedings.1 We review de novo the jurisdictional limits of IIRIRA and review for substantial evidence the BIA’s factual findings. *Pondoc Hemaez v. INS,*244 F.3d 752, 756 (9th Cir.2001). We deny the petition.

This Court lacks jurisdiction to review the Immigration and Naturalization Service’s (“INS”) discretionary decision when to commence removal proceedings. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(g); *Montero-Martinez v. INS,*277 F.3d 1137, 1140-41 (9th Cir. 2002).

Furthermore, because a twelve-month delay fails to establish affirmative misconduct by the INS, petitioner’s due process challenges to the INS’s discretionary decision when to commence removal proceedings are foreclosed by *Cortez-Felipe v. INS,*245 F.3d 1054, 1057 (9th Cir.2001).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. The permanent rules of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act ("IIRIRA”) of 1996 apply to this case because removal proceedings were initiated against petitioner after April 1, 1997. *See Kalawv. INS,*133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir. 1997).
----

----

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 11, 2010 |                          |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                    |                          |   |
|                    | /s/ Guy Bernstein        |   |
|                    | Guy Bernstein                 |   |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer       |   |
|                    | (Principal Executive Officer) |   |

----

----
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1347

To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the requirement that 

for former prisoners of war to be eligible for Department of Veterans 

Affairs dental benefits they must have been interned for a specified 

minimum period of time. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 19, 2003

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to repeal the requirement that for former prisoners of war to be eligible 

for Department of Veterans Affairs dental benefits they 

must have been interned for a specified minimum period 

of time.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Former Prisoners of 

5 War Equitable Dental Benefits Act’’. 
2

•HR 1347 IH 

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIRED MINIMUM PERIOD OF IN2 TERNMENT FOR FORMER PRISONERS OF 

3 WAR TO BE ELIGIBILE FOR DEPARTMENT OF 

4 VETERANS AFFAIRS DENTAL BENEFITS. 

5 Section 1712(a)(1)(F) of title 38, United States 

6 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘for a period of not less than 

7 90 days’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 1

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 99-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/18/2020 Page 1 of 3
Exhibit 32.2


                           GREG MANNING AUCTIONS, INC.
                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Greg Manning Auctions,
Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2004, I, Larry Crawford, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Greg Manning Auctions, Inc., hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   this Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 fully complies
               with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
               of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   the information contained in this Form 10-Q for the period ended
               March 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
               financial condition and results of operations of Greg Manning
               Auctions, Inc.


Dated:   May 5, 2004

                                   /s/ Larry Crawford
                                   -------------------------------------------
                                    Larry Crawford, Executive Vice President
                                    and Chief Financial Officer
### §5. Nominations for Representatives at large

Candidates for Representative or Representatives to be elected at large in any State shall be nominated in the same manner as candidates for governor, unless otherwise provided by the laws of such State.

(Aug. 8, 1911, ch. 5, §5, 37 Stat. 14.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

IMPERIAL BRANDS PLC, et al., 

Defendants.

Case No.: 1:20-cv-23287-DPG

DEFENDANT IMPERIAL BRANDS PLC’S FIRST STATUS REPORT

Defendant Imperial Brands plc (“Imperial”) respectfully submits this status report pursuant 

to the Court’s September 23, 2020 Order [D.E. 49] granting Imperial’s motion for a limited stay 

of proceedings and directing Imperial to submit monthly status reports on its application to the 

European Commission (the “Commission”) for authorization to defend this lawsuit or, at a 

minimum, to file and litigate a motion to dismiss. By way of update, Imperial states as follows:

1. As Imperial previously advised the Court [D.E. 14, D.E. 15-1], on August 27, 2020, 

Imperial submitted an application to the Commission under Article 5 paragraph 2 of Council 

Regulation (EC) No. 2271/96, Protecting Against the Effects of the Extra-Territorial Application 

of Legislation Adopted by a Third County, and Actions Based Thereon or Resulting Therefrom, 

1996 O.J. (L. 309) 1 (EC) (“Regulation 2271/96”), for authorization to defend this lawsuit or, at a 

minimum, authorization in the first instance to file and litigate a motion to dismiss (the 

“Application”).

2. The Commission has acknowledged receipt of Imperial’s Application, and has 

cautioned Imperial that unless and until the Commission provides authorization Imperial is 

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 51 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/23/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

prohibited from appearing before this Court pursuant to the summons in this action under Title III 

of the Helms-Burton Act.

3. Imperial notified the Commission of the requirement to file a status report and 

requested that the Commission therefore provide Imperial an update on the status of its application 

ahead of the October 23, 2020 due date. On October 21, 2020, the Commission informed Imperial 

that the Commission is currently analyzing Imperial’s application and will do its utmost to ensure 

that a decision is made in due course.

Dated: October 23, 2020

Miami, Florida

 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Mark F. Raymond

NELSON MULLINS BROAD AND CASSEL

Mark F. Raymond

Mark.Raymond@nelsonmullins.com

Jonathan Etra

Jonathan.Etra@nelsonmullins.com

2 South Biscayne Blvd., 21st Floor 

Miami, FL 33131 

Telephone: 305-373-9400

ALLEN & OVERY LLP

Andrew Rhys Davies (admitted pro hac vice)

andrewrhys.davies@allenovery.com

Justin L. Ormand (admitted pro hac vice)

justin.ormand@allenovery.com

1221 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10020

Telephone: 212-610-6300

 Attorneys for Defendant Imperial Brands plc

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 51 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/23/2020 Page 2 of 2
### §6136. Transfer of funds from representation allowance of Majority and Minority Leaders of Senate to expense allowance; availability; definitions

(a) The Secretary of the Senate shall, upon the written request of the Majority or Minority Leader of the Senate, transfer from any available funds in such Leader's allotment in the Leader's Representation Allowance (as defined in subsection (b)(1)) for any fiscal year (commencing with the fiscal year ending September 30, 1985) to such Leader's Expense Allowance (as defined in subsection (b)(2)) to such year such amount as is specified in the request. Any funds so transferred for any fiscal year at the request of either such Leader shall be available to such Leader for such year for the same purposes as, and in like manner and subject to the same conditions as, are other funds which are available to him for such year as his expense allowance as Majority or Minority Leader.

(b)(1) The term "Leader's Representation Allowance" means the Representation Allowance Account for the Majority and Minority Leaders established by section 6135 of this title.

(2) The term "Leader's Expense Allowance", when used in reference to the Majority or Minority Leader of the Senate, refers to the moneys available, for any fiscal year, to such Leader as an expense allowance and the appropriation account from which such moneys are funded.

(Pub. L. 100–71, title I, §1, July 11, 1987, 101 Stat. 422.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 31a–2a of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1987.
### §413. Retention of existing rights of members

Nothing contained in this subchapter shall limit the rights and remedies of any member of a labor organization under any State or Federal law or before any court or other tribunal, or under the constitution and bylaws of any labor organization.

(Pub. L. 86–257, title I, §103, Sept. 14, 1959, 73 Stat. 523.)