alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-34 March 26, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

................................. NRC COMMISSIONER DIAZ TO VISIT MILLSTONE NUCLEAR PLANT ON APRIL 6

Commissioner Nils J. Diaz of the Nuclear Regulatory

Commission will hold a news briefing on Monday, April 6,

following his visit to the Millstone nuclear power plant in

Waterford, Conn. Commissioner Diaz will be available to answer

questions about efforts to restart the Millstone reactors, the

agency’s oversight of that work and other nuclear-related topics.

The briefing, which is intended for members of the

working media, will begin at 4 p.m. at Waterford Town Hall, on

Rope Ferry Road.

During his visit, the commissioner will tour the facility

and meet with NRC staff members and plant management and

employees. He also will meet with representatives of pertinent

public interest groups.

Commissioner Diaz has been in office since August 1996.

He previously was a professor of nuclear engineering at the

University of Florida and director of the Innovative Nuclear

Space Power and Propulsion Institute, a national consortium of

universities and industry.

#

EDITORS: A biographical sketch of Commissioner Diaz is available

upon request.
#### § 162.11 Authority to procure warrants.

Customs officers are authorized to procure search warrants under the provisions of section 595, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1595). However, a Customs officer who is lawfully on any premises and is able to identify merchandise which has been imported contrary to law may seize such merchandise without a warrant. If merchandise is in a building on the boundary, see § 123.71 of this chapter.
### §75a–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 75a–1 was editorially reclassified as section 5501 of this title.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 70 

To amend title 32, United States Code, to authorize cybersecurity operations 

and missions to protect critical infrastructure by members of the National 

Guard in connection with training or other duty. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 27, 2021 

Ms. HASSAN (for herself and Mr. CORNYN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 32, United States Code, to authorize cybersecurity operations and missions to protect critical infrastructure by members of the National Guard in connection with training or other duty. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Guard Cyber5 security Support Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 70 IS

1 SEC. 2. CYBERSECURITY OPERATIONS AND MISSIONS TO 

2 PROTECT CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE BY 

3 MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL GUARD IN CON4 NECTION WITH TRAINING OR OTHER DUTY. 

5 Section 502(f)(1) of title 32, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding after the flush matter at the end the 

7 following new sentence: ‘‘Such training or other duty may 

8 include cybersecurity operations or missions undertaken 

9 by the member’s unit at the request of the Governor of 

10 the State concerned to protect critical infrastructure (as 

11 that term is defined in the Critical Infrastructures Protec12 tion Act of 2001 (42 U.S.C. 5195c)).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 00-014 January 19, 2000

NRC PROPOSES TO AMEND REGULATIONS TO ADD

NAC FUEL STORAGE CASK DESIGN TO APPROVED LIST

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is proposing to amend its regulations to add the

NAC-UMS Universal Storage System to the list of approved cask designs that utilities may use -

- under a general license and without site-specific approval -- to store spent fuel at their nuclear

power plants.

Under the terms of an NRC general license, any nuclear power reactor licensee can use a

pre-approved cask, if the company notifies the NRC in advance, meets the conditions of the

cask’s NRC certificate of compliance, and complies with NRC’s regulations. These regulations

include a requirement to ensure that the reactor site characteristics and potential site-boundary

radiation doses are within the scope of the cask’s safety analysis report and the reactor license.

The NAC-UMS certificate would contain conditions for use that are similar to others for

NRC-approved casks. However, the certificate for each cask design may differ in some specific

areas, such as operating procedures, training and spent fuel specifications.

The NRC staff has issued a preliminary safety evaluation report that finds, if the

conditions specified in the certificate of compliance are met, adequate protection of public health

and safety will be maintained. The staff’s environmental assessment determined that use of the

NAC-UMS cask design at reactor sites would have no significant incremental impacts on the

environment.

Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on the proposed amendments

(Part 72 of the Commission’s regulations). Comments should be submitted within 75 days after

publication of a Federal Register notice on the subject, expected shortly. The comments should

be addressed to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-

0001, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. Comments may also be submitted via

the NRC’s interactive rulemaking web site at http://ruleforum.llnl.gov.

###
#### § 148.3 Customs treatment after transiting the Panama Canal.

Passengers' baggage and effects and purchases of officers and crewmembers landed in the United States from vessels which have transited the Panama Canal are subject to Customs examination and treatment in the same manner as arrivals from any other foreign country.

[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. 79-276, 44 FR 61957, Oct. 29, 1979]
§ 148.37 Replacement of unsatisfactory articles acquired abroad. ( a ) *Free entry of replacement articles.* An article furnished by a foreign supplier to replace a like article of comparable value previously exempted from duty under the $800 or $1,600 exemptions for articles acquired abroad will be allowed free entry if the original article is found by the importer to be unsatisfactory and the procedures provided by paragraph (b) of this section are followed. In any case in which the importer has failed to follow these procedures, the port director may allow free entry of the replacement article if he is satisfied that the unsatisfactory article was timely exported and that the failure to comply with the procedures of paragraph (b) of this section was due to inadvertence or lack of experience in customs matters and was without willful intent to avoid CBP supervision.
( b ) *Procedure for replacement.* Any article previously exempted from duty under the $800 or $1,600 exemptions found by the importer to be unsatisfactory must be returned to CBP custody and exported under CBP supervision at the expense of the importer within 60 days after its importation. A certificate of registration on CBP Form 4455, or its electronic equivalent, will be issued to the importer with instructions as to its use when the unsatisfactory article is exported for replacement under the provisions of subheading 9804.00.75, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.
( c ) *Articles found damaged upon declaration.* The requirement that the original article be exported under CBP supervision does not apply when a duplicate article is furnished by a foreign supplier as a replacement for an article declared for entry under the $800 or $1,600 exemption and found by the CBP inspector or other examining officer to be so damaged as to constitute a nonimportation (§ 158.11 of this chapter). In such a case, CBP Form 4455, or its electronic equivalent, will be issued to the importer at the time the determination of nonimportation is made and the duplicate replacement will be considered to have been acquired abroad for the purposes of the $800 or $1,600 exemption provision, provided no charge is made to the importer for the duplicate replacement.
[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. 86-118, 51 FR 22516, June 20, 1986; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51264, Dec. 21, 1988; T.D. 97-75, 62 FR 46442, Sept. 3, 1997; CBP Dec. 09-37, 74 FR 48855, Sept. 25, 2009; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61291, Oct. 13, 2015]
#### Harry W. Lawrence, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Patrick J. Heaney, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.; Clarke, J., dissented.
### §4558. Withholding of charitable contributions; definitions

For purposes of section 4557 of this title—

(1) the term "charitable organizations" means national voluntary health and welfare agencies designated by the Director of the Office of Personnel Management pursuant to Executive Order 10927, dated March 19, 1961; and

(2) the term "employee" means any employee of the House of Representatives whose compensation is disbursed by the Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives.

(Pub. L. 95–391, title I, §111, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 777; 1978 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §102, eff. Jan. 1, 1979, 43 F.R. 36037, 92 Stat. 3783; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §204(5)(B), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1730.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Executive Order 10927, dated March 18, 1961, referred to in par. (1), was revoked, and is covered, by Ex. Ord. No. 12353, Mar. 23, 1982, 47 F.R. 12785.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 60e–1d of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is based on section 2 of House Resolution No. 12, Ninety-fifth Congress, August 5, 1977, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 95–391.

#### Amendments

1996—Par. (1). Pub. L. 104–186, §204(5)(B)(i), inserted "and" at end.

Par. (2). Pub. L. 104–186, §204(5)(B)(ii), (iv), redesignated par. (3) as (2) and struck out former par. (2) which read as follows: "the term 'Clerk' means the Clerk of the House of Representatives;".

Par. (3). Pub. L. 104–186, §204(5)(B)(iii), (iv), substituted "Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives" for "Clerk" and redesignated par. (3) as (2).

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Director of the Office of Personnel Management" substituted for "Chairman of the Civil Service Commission" in par. (1) pursuant to Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1978, §102, 43 F.R. 36037, 92 Stat. 3783, set out under section 1101 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, which transferred functions vested by statute in United States Civil Service Commission and Chairman thereof to Director of Office of Personnel Management (except as otherwise specified), effective Jan. 1, 1979, as provided by section 1–102 of Ex. Ord. No. 12107, Dec. 28, 1978, 44 F.R. 1055, set out under section 1101 of Title 5.
§ 162.47 Claim for property subject to summary forfeiture. ( a ) *Filing of claim.* Any person desiring to claim under the provisions of section 608, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1608), seized property not exceeding $500,000 in value (however there is no limit in value of merchandise, the importation of which is prohibited, or in the value of vessels, vehicles or aircraft used to import, export, transport, or store any controlled substance, or in the amount of any monetary instruments within the meaning of 31 U.S.C. 5312(a)(3), that may be seized and forfeited) and subject to summary forfeiture, shall file a claim to such property with the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer within 20 days from the date of the first publication of the notice prescribed in § 162.45.
( b ) *Bond for costs.* Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, the bond in the penal sum of $5,000 or 10% of the value of the claimed property, whichever is lower, but not less than $250, required by section 608, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be filed with a claim for seized property shall be on Customs Form 301, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.72 of this chapter.
( c ) *Claimant not entitled to possession.* The filing of a claim and the giving of a bond, if required, pursuant to section 608, Tariff Act of 1930, shall not be construed to entitle the claimant to possession of the property. Such action only stops the summary forfeiture proceeding.
( d ) *Report to the U.S. attorney.* When the claim and bond, if required, are filed within the 20-day period, the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer shall report the case to the U.S. attorney for the institution of condemnation proceedings.
( e ) *Waiver of bond.* Upon satisfactory proof of financial inability to post the bond, the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer shall waive the bond requirement for any person who claims an interest in the seized property.
[T.D. 72-211, 37 FR 16488, Aug. 15, 1972, as amended by T.D. 81-1, 45 FR 84994, Dec. 24, 1980; T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41186, Oct. 19, 1984; T.D. 85-123, 50 FR 29956, July 23, 1985; T.D. 91-52, 56 FR 25364, June 4, 1991; T.D. 99-27, 64 FR 13676, Mar. 22, 1999]
Case 9:20-mc-81409-RKA   Document 1-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2020   Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
The Board of Directors
Big City Radio, Inc.:
 
   
    We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of Big City Radio, Inc. of our report dated March 20, 1998, relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of Big City Radio, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years
in the two-year period ended December 31, 1997, and Schedule II, Combined
Financial Statement Schedules Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years
ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, which report appears in the December 31, 1997,
annual report on Form 10-K/A of Big City Radio, Inc.
    
 
                                             /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                                KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
   
Los Angeles, California
April 7, 1998
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.553 Textile and apparel site visits. ( a ) *Visits to enterprises of Singapore.* U.S. officials may undertake to conduct site visits to enterprises in the territory of Singapore. U.S. officials will conduct such visits together with responsible officials of the Government of Singapore and in accordance with the laws of Singapore.
( b ) *Denial of permission to visit.* If the responsible officials of an enterprise of Singapore that is proposed to be visited do not consent to the site visit, CBP will, if directed by The Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements (CITA), exclude from the territory of the United States textile or apparel goods produced or exported by the enterprise until CITA determines that the enterprise's production of, and capability to produce, such goods is consistent with statements by the enterprise that textile or apparel goods it produces or has produced are originating goods or products of Singapore.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 30, 2021

No. 04-21-00092-CR

Gasper MENDIOLA Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CR2147

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The trial court imposed sentence in the underlying cause on January 19, 2021. Because 

appellant did not file a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on February 

18, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of 

appeal was due on March 5, 2021. See id. R. 26.3. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on March 

15, 2021. He did not file a motion for extension of time.

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. See 

Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). A late notice of appeal may be 

considered timely so as to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction if (1) it is filed within fifteen 

days of the last day allowed for filing, (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of 

appeals within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and (3) the 

court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time. See id. Having reviewed the record, it 

appears that the notice of appeal was untimely filed, and no motion for extension of time was 

filed. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within two weeks from the 

date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See id.; see 

also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)(out-of-time 

appeal from final felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 

article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure).1

1 We also note the trial court’s certification in this appeal states: “[T]his criminal case . . . is a plea-bargain case, and 

the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment 

assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, 

the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the criminal case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 
_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of March, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a 

certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” 

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-15T08:12:49Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-15T08:12:50Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-15T08:12:50Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="12722">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-15T08:12:49Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OPINION f Q-7452 WAS NEVER ISSUED OK 
</p>
<p>WAS WITHDRAWN. </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
#### § 191.41 Rejected merchandise drawback.

Section 313(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(c)), provides for drawback upon the exportation or destruction under Customs supervision of imported merchandise which has been entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, duty-paid; and which does not conform to sample or specifications; has been shipped without the consent of the consignee; or has been determined to be defective as of the time of importation. The claimant must show by evidence satisfactory to Customs that the exported or destroyed merchandise was defective at the time of importation, or was not in accordance with sample or specifications, or was shipped without the consent of the consignee (see subpart P for drawback of internal-revenue taxes for unmerchantable or nonconforming distilled spirits, wines, or beer).
### §146. Deposit of Journals of Senate and House

Twenty-five copies of the public Journals of the Senate, and of the House of Representatives, shall be deposited in the Library of the United States, at the seat of government, to be delivered to Members of Congress during any session, and to all other persons authorized by law to use the books in the Library, upon their application to the Librarian, and giving their responsible receipts for the same, in like manner as for other books.

(R.S. §98.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §98 derived from Res. Dec. 27, 1813, No. 1, 3 Stat. 140; Res. July 20, 1840, No. 5, 5 Stat. 409.