alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Hedwig A. Kennedy, Respondent, v. James B. Kennedy, Appellant.

The defendant did not sustain the burden of proof, which was upon him, of establishing that the Florida divorce was invalid. Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*pp. 847, 957.]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No.: 1:20-cv-23287-GAYLES

LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

IMPERIAL BRANDS PLC, et al., 

Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

UNOPPOSED JOINT MOTION FOR AN ORDER SETTING 

COORDINATED MOTION TO DISMISS PROCEDURE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on Defendants Imperial Brands plc 

(“Imperial”), WPP plc, Young & Rubicam LLC, BCW LLC (the “WPP Defendants”), and 

Corporación Habanos, S.A. (“Habanos”) (collectively, the “Defendants”)’s Unopposed Motion for 

an Order Setting Coordinated Motion to Dismiss Procedure and Briefing Schedule (the “Motion”)

[ECF No. 86], and good cause appearing therefore, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the 

Motion is GRANTED. The Parties shall adhere to the following deadlines and procedures:

1. The Amended Complaint filed March 22, 2021, [ECF No. 82], will be treated as 

though it had been filed no later than March 19, 2021, as required by Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 15(a)(1)(B), and will therefore be treated as the operative complaint. 

2. The Defendants’ deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended 

Complaint shall be April 28, 2021.

a. Defendants shall file a Consolidated Motion to Dismiss, making arguments 

common to all Defendants, not to exceed twenty-five (25) pages.

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/31/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

b. While Defendants will work collaboratively to consolidate briefing on as many 

relevant issues as possible, Imperial (individually), the WPP Defendants 

(together), and Habanos (individually) shall have the option of filing separate

motions and memoranda of law on their individualized arguments, not to 

exceed twenty (20) pages each, to address any additional arguments that 

Defendants wish to raise that are not contained in the Consolidated Motion 

arguments, including, but not limited to, particularized arguments relating to 

jurisdiction.

3. Plaintiffs’ deadline to file a Response to the Consolidated Motion to Dismiss and 

the Individual Briefs set forth in Paragraph 2 above shall be May 28, 2021. Plaintiffs’ Responses

to such briefing shall not exceed the number of permissible pages of the respective opening briefs:

twenty-five (25) pages to respond to the Consolidated Motion to Dismiss and twenty (20) pages to 

respond to the Individual Briefs.

4. Defendants shall be permitted to file Replies to Plaintiffs’ Responses by June 18,

2021, as follows:

a. A Reply in support of the Consolidated Motion to Dismiss, not to exceed fifteen

(15) pages; and

b. Replies in support of any Individual Briefs, not to exceed ten (10) pages.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 31st day of March, 2021.

____________________________________

DARRIN P. GAYLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished via CM/ECF to Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/31/2021 Page 2 of 2
### §1311. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–280, title V, §501(b)(1), Aug. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 939

Section, Pub. L. 93–406, title IV, §4011, as added Pub. L. 103–465, title VII, §775(a), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 5046, related to notice to participants of plan's funding status and limitations on corporation's guaranty.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to plan years beginning after Dec. 31, 2006, see section 501(d)(1) of Pub. L. 109–280, set out as an Effective Date of 2006 Amendment note under section 1021 of this title.
Revised/Clean Ch 6 

 12/16/2011 06:50 PM 

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US 

 

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Chapter 6_EmploymentandEconomicImpacts_1216 evening.docx
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.531 Extension of maturity.

SBA may agree to extend the maturity of a loan for up to 10 years beyond its original maturity if the extension will aid in the orderly repayment of the loan.
#### § 112.21 License required.

A customhouse cartage or lighterage license issued by the port director in accordance with this part or specific authorization of the Commissioner of Customs shall be required to perform Customs cartage or lighterage, except as provided in §§ 18.3 and 125.12 of this chapter or, as provided in § 112.2(b), when such merchandise is to be transported under the bond of the foreign trade zone operator, bonded warehouse proprietor, centralized examination station operator, container station operator, or a bonded carrier.

[T.D. 94-81, 59 FR 51495, Oct. 12, 1994]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov 

No. III-02-062 November 13, 2002

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

 Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662

NRC LESSONS LEARNED TASK FORCE TO DISCUSS FINDINGS

AT PUBLIC MEETING NOVEMBER 20 IN OAK HARBOR, OHIO

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Lessons Learned Task Force will discuss the findings of

its review of NRC activities associated with the reactor vessel head damage at the Davis-Besse Nuclear

Power Plant in a public meeting November 20 in Oak Harbor, Ohio.

The meeting will be at 7 p.m. in the Oak Harbor High School Auditorium, 11661 West State

Route 163, Oak Harbor. Members of the public are invited to participate in the meeting. Beginning at

6:30 p.m., displays and background materials will be available, and NRC staff members will be present

for informal discussions with the public.

The Task Force report, which was issued in early October, is available on the NRC’s web site: 

http://www.nrc.gov. Select “Davis-Besse” from the key topics menu; then select the “News and

Correspondence” link where the report is posted.

The findings and recommendations of the task force are being evaluated by an NRC Senior

Management Review Team. The team will then recommend to the NRC’s Executive Director for

Operations any changes to agency policies and practices to address the issues arising out of the task

force’s review. The recommendations are expected by the end of November.

On March 5 of this year workers at the Davis-Besse plant found a cavity, caused by boric acid

corrosion, in the top of the reactor vessel during repair activities while the plant was shut down. The

plant remains shut down for replacement of the reactor vessel head and for broad safety reviews and

performance improvement activities.

The Lessons Learned Task Force was formed to review the full scope of NRC regulatory

activities related to the Davis-Besse damage, including the agency inspection and assessment program,

industry-wide generic activities, research work, and international practices. It was comprised of NRC

staff members not previously associated with the oversight of the Davis-Besse plant. Art Howell, a

senior manager at the NRC’s Region IV Office in Texas, directed the effort. An official from the Ohio

State Emergency Management Agency participated in the task force as an observer.

# # #
Exhibit 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of TransAltaCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Stephen G. Snyder, President and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of my knowledge:

 
| 1.     |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                          |
| 2.     |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  materials respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the  Company.        |

 

 
| /s/ Stephen G. Snyder                 |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Stephen G. Snyder                     |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

Dated: March 13, 2008.

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnishedsolely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, and is not beingfiled for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of theCompany, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              80
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                       213
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,657
<PP&E>                                           3,504
<DEPRECIATION>                                     825
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,876
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           140
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,892
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,108
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,460
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,518
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (101)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   304
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,348
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,305)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,605)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (313)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,918)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 206.61 Applicability of subpart.

The provisions of this subpart G apply to investigations under section 422(b) and/or reviews under section 422(j) of the Trade Act. For other applicable rules, see subpart A of this part and part 201 of this chapter.
| 1.        | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                         |
| 2.                                           | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|                                         |

| Date: December 9, 2010 | By: /s/ W. Kerry Jackson     |
|------------------------|------------------------------|
|                   | W. Kerry Jackson             |
|                   | Executive Vice President and |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer      |

----
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diametrics Medical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Laurence L. Betterley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    LAURENCE L. BETTERLEYLaurence L. BetterleyChief Financial OfficerAugust 14, 2002
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-00-26 May 26, 2000

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS

LATEST ASSESSMENT OF SEQUOYAH PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a public meeting for Thursday, June 1 to

discuss the NRC Reactor Oversight Program Annual Assessment for the Tennessee Valley Authority’s

Sequoyah Nuclear Power Plant.

The meeting will be at 10 a.m. EDT at the Sequoyah Training Center at the plant near SoddyDaisy, Tennessee. NRC staff members will discuss the plant’s performance and will be available after

the meeting to answer any questions from media or members of the public.

The oversight program annual assessments are used to evaluate safety performance

information and identify any changes in plant performance so the NRC can allocate inspection

resources appropriately. The text of each report, including the one on Sequoyah, is available from the

NRC Office of Public Affairs and has been posted on the NRC web site at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr.

Current performance information for the two units at Sequoyah is available on the NRC web

site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SEQ1/seq1_chart.html and

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SEQ2/seq2_chart.html.

###
Exhibit 32.2




CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*




In connection with the Annual Report of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10--K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Carter Peters, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Carter Peters




Carter Peters


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)





March 30, 2011
EXHIBIT 10.1

RAYMOND CHABOT GRANT THORNTON

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

We
consent to the use in this Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the year ended November 30, 2002 of Novamerican Steel Inc.
on Form 20-F of our report dated December 20, 2002, accompanying the Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule II of the Company appearing in this Annual Report.

We
also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Item 3 Key InformationSelected Financial Data" in such Annual Report.

We
also consent to the incorporation of our reports by reference to Novamerican Steel Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-7688).

RAYMOND CHABOT GRANT THORNTON

Chartered
Accountants
General Partnership

Montréal,
Canada
February 26, 2003

---

QuickLinks
§ 175.25 Procedure at port of entry designated by petitioner. ( a ) *Information as to character and description of merchandise.* All information secured by the director of the port designated by the petitioner in his notice of desire to contest as to the character and description of merchandise of the kind covered by the petition and entered after publication by the Commissioner of Customs of his decision as to the proper appraised value, classification and rate of duty, and samples of such merchandise, shall be made available to the petitioner upon application by him to the port director.
( b ) *Notice of liquidation.* Notice of liquidation of the first of the entries to be liquidated which would enable the petitioner to present the issue desired shall be given to the petitioner by the director of the designated port as required by section 516. Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1516).
( c ) *Further notice when issue not presented.* If, upon examination of the information and inspection of any sample supplied by the port director, the petitioner believes and the port director agrees that the merchandise or the facts surrounding this importation are not sufficient to raise the issue involved in the petition, the port director shall then give the petitioner notice of the first liquidation thereafter which will permit the framing of the issue covered by the petition. The port director shall, under the same conditions, continue to give notice for so long as he is of the opinion that the petitioner affirmatively intends to contest. When the port director concludes that the petitioner does not intend to contest the decision of the Commissioner of Customs, he shall refer the matter to the Commissioner of Customs for his decision before issuing any further notice of liquidation.
[T.D. 70-181, 35 FR 13432, Aug. 22, 1970, as amended by T.D. 99-27, 64 FR 13677, Mar. 22, 1999]
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 99-08 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson March 22, 1999

OFFICE: 817-860-8128

PAGER: 888-876-2331

E-Mail: bwh@nrc.gov

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT PERFORMANCE REMAINS ACCEPTABLE

IN NRC’S LATEST PLANT REVIEW

Public meeting scheduled to discuss results of the Plant Performance Review

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found in its latest Plant Performance

Review (PPR) that safety performance remains acceptable at the South Texas Project (STP)

nuclear power plant, located near Bay City, Texas.

NRC’s review covers the period from November 16, 1997, to January 25, 1999. Officials

from the NRC and STP Nuclear Operating Co. (STPNOC), the operator of South Texas Project,

will discuss the PPR during a meeting set for 9 a.m on Thursday, March 25 in the Nuclear

Support Center auditorium at the plant site. The meeting is open for public observation. NRC

officials will be available afterwards to speak with reporters, state and local officials, or members

of the public.

In a letter to STPNOC President William T. Cottle summarizing the review findings,

NRC Branch Chief Joseph I. Tapia said, “Overall performance at South Texas Project continued

to be acceptable. A strong safety focus in response to equipment problems and during routine

operations was exhibited.” Mr. Tapia also said that owing to the steady performance only the

“core inspection” program will be conducted during the coming six months.

The Plant Performance Review, which is conducted every six months, is an interim

measure NRC is utilizing to monitor nuclear power plants’ safety performance. NRC began

using it after suspending the Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) program

pending development of a new assessment mechanism.

Previously, SALP reports were the principal means by which the NRC assessed nuclear

power plant performance and informed the public of its findings. The new plant assessment

regimen will be tested in a pilot program at eight plants beginning in June. If successful, it will

be applied nationwide in January of next year. A full description of the new program can be

found on the NRC website at http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.
Plant Performance Reviews are conducted by the NRC staff to determine the amount of

inspection that will be required at a given plant during the coming six months. The information

is also used by senior NRC managers during their annual review of the performance of all the

nation’s nuclear plants. No grading system is applied and the only terms used to describe overall

performance are acceptable or unacceptable.

The full text of the Performance Review letter is available by calling Region IV public

affairs, or on the NRC website at http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr.

###
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93021, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 151.26 Molasses in tank cars.

When molasses is imported in tank cars, the importer shall file with the port director a certificate showing whether there is any substantial difference either in the total sugars or the character of the molasses in the different cars.
#### Deana K. KELLEY, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 02-3153.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 1, 2002.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1), and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, and to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted, it is

ORDERED that the petition for reviewbe, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
§ 200.735-102 Definitions. In this part: ( a ) *Commission* means the U.S. International Trade Commission.
( b ) *Commissioner* means a Commissioner of the U.S. International Trade Commission.
( c ) *Employee* means a Commissioner, employee, or special Government employee of the Commission.
( d ) *Executive order* means Executive Order 11222 of May 8, 1965.
( e ) *Person* means an individual, a corporation, a company, an association, a firm, a partnership, a society, a joint stock company, or any other organization or institution.
( f ) *Special Government employee* means a “special Government employee” as defined in section 202 of Title 18 of the United States Code who is employed by the Commission.
[31 FR 2593, Feb. 10, 1966, as amended at 44 FR 23823, Apr. 23, 1979; 46 FR 17542, Mar. 19, 1981; 56 FR 36726, Aug. 1, 1991]