alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 500.200 Eligible Borrower. ( a ) An eligible Borrower must be a Qualified Oil and Gas Company that can demonstrate: ( 1 ) Credit is not otherwise available to it under reasonable terms or conditions sufficient to meet its financing needs, as reflected in the financial and business plans of the company;
( 2 ) The prospective earning power of that company, together with the character and value of the security pledged, furnish reasonable assurance of repayment of the loan to be guaranteed in accordance with its terms;
( 3 ) The company has agreed to permit audits by the General Accounting Office and an independent auditor acceptable to the Board prior to the issuance of the guarantee and while any such guaranteed loan is outstanding; and
( 4 ) It has experienced layoffs, production losses, or financial losses between January 1, 1997, and the date of application for the Guarantee, demonstrated as a comparison between employment, production, or net income existing on January 1, 1997 and on the date of application.
( b ) The Lender must provide with its application a letter from at least one lending institution other than the Lender to which the Borrower has applied for financial assistance, since January 1, 1997, indicating that the Borrower was denied for substantially the same loan they are now applying for, and the reasons the Borrower was unable to obtain the financing for which it applied. In addition, the Lender applying for a guarantee under this Program must certify that it would not make the loan without the Board's guarantee.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 2, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51486 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GERARDO LUEVANO-DIAZ, also known as Juan Manuel Trujillo, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1096-ALL

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Gerardo LuevanoDiaz raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 1:20-cv-23179-MGC Document 1-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/31/2020 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 1:20-cv-23179-MGC Document 1-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/31/2020 Page 2 of 2
### §61f–12. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 61f–12 was editorially reclassified as section 6628 of this title.
**U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission**

**Selection of FY 2015 Special Interest Function for Analysis**

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has selected Product Service Code (PSC) AZ11, “R&D – Other Research and Development (Basic Research)” for further review during fiscal year (FY) 2016.  NRC obligated $2,825,499.00 on contracts under this PSC during FY15.  PSC AZ11 has been selected for further analysis for the following reasons:

· It has not appeared previously on NRC’s Top 10 PSC list;

· The remaining Top 9 PSCs for FY15 are either being evaluated as part of NRC’s Technical Assistance/ Research (TA&R) Portfolio Council, and additional analysis in these areas would be duplicative, or further analysis would be unwarranted due to the nature of those services; and

· PSC AZ11 was not the subject of a previous focused analysis.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 96-63 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson December 27, 1996

OFFICE: 817/860-8128

PAGER: (800) 443-7243 (065477)

NRC PROPOSES TO FINE WATERFORD

$50,000 FOR DESIGN ERROR

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has notified the Waterford Steam Electric

Station, Unit 3 nuclear power plant, operated by Entergy Operations, Inc., that it proposes to fine

the company $50,000 for allowing the installed configuration of a plant system to vary from the

design described in the plant's Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR).

The FSAR describes all Waterford 3's safety systems and provides the basis for the

NRC's decision to grant an operating license for the plant.

During inspections conducted from June 3 to July 10 and August 27-29, NRC staff found

that instrument lines which, during a loss-of-coolant accident, would carry potentially

contaminated air, exhausted into a room without filtration or controlled ventilation. This could

have allowed plant control room operators or the public outside the plant to receive radiation

doses in excess of federal limits. Waterford engineers have corrected this problem and are

reviewing other similar instrument lines.

The violation is classified as Severity Level III, with a civil penalty of $50,000. The NRC

classifies violations on a four-level scale, with Level I being the most severe. No one received an

excess radiation dose because of the problem.

NRC Regional Administrator L. Joe Callan, said, in a letter to Waterford Vice President

Michael B. Sellman, that the NRC was imposing the fine ". . . to emphasize the importance of

ensuring that the plant is operated in accordance with its FSAR and the importance of prompt

identification of non-conforming conditions . . ."

Entergy must respond to the NRC's Notice of Violation in writing within 30 days, during

which time it may pay the civil penalty or protest it. If the protest is denied the company may ask

for a hearing.

###
#### § 158.41 Destruction of prohibited merchandise.

Merchandise regularly entered or withdrawn for consumption in good faith and denied admission into the United States by any Government agency after its release from Customs custody, pursuant to a law or regulation in force on the date of entry or withdrawal for consumption, may be destroyed under Government supervision. In such case, the destroyed merchandise is exempt from duty and any duties collected thereon shall be refunded. In lieu of destruction, the merchandise may be exported under Customs supervision in accordance with § 158.45(c).

(Sec. 558(a), 46 Stat. 744, as amended; 19 U.S.C. 1558(a))
### §§241 to 248. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–225, title IV, §405, Feb. 7, 1972, 86 Stat. 20

Sections, act Feb. 28, 1925, ch. 368, title III, §§302–309, 43 Stat. 1070–1073, provided for:

Section 241, amended Dec. 23, 1971, Pub. L. 92–220, §2, 85 Stat. 795, definitions;

Section 242, chairman and treasurer of political committees, duties as to contributions, and accounts and receipts;

Section 243, accounts of contributions received;

Section 244, statements by treasurer filed with Clerk of House of Representatives;

Section 245, statements by others than political committee filed with Clerk of House of Representatives;

Section 246, statements by candidates for Senator, Representative, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner filed with Secretary of Senate and Clerk of House of Representatives;

Section 247, statements: verification, preservation, and inspection; and

Section 248, limitation upon amount of expenditures by candidate.

Such former provisions are covered generally by chapter 301 (§30101 et seq.) of Title 52, Voting and Elections.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 60 days after Feb. 7, 1972, see section 408 of Pub. L. 92–225, set out as an Effective Date note under section 30101 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Declaration of Disaster #P068]
 As a result of the President's major disaster declaration for Public Assistance on October 7, 2004, the U.S. Small Business Administration is activating its disaster loan program only for private non-profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature. I find that Campbell, Carter, Clay, Cocke, 
                    ( print page 61544)
                    Cumberland, Grundy, Hamilton, Jackson, Johnson, Meigs, Polk, Rhea, and Roane Counties in the State of Tennessee constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms and flooding occurring on September 16-20, 2004. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on December 6, 2004 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308. The interest rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.900Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.875
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is P06806. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59008). Dated: October 13, 2004. Cheri L. Cannon, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 04-23400 Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FILED AS
PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       6,191,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,000,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,950,000
<INVENTORY>                                 15,335,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,724,000
<PP&E>                                      16,278,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,451,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,890,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,739,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,064,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,890,000
<SALES>                                     15,616,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,616,000
<CGS>                                       15,766,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,766,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,557,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               250,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,504,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,504,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,504,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.40)
        

</TABLE>
#### Stephens v. Stephens.

June 12, 1945.

Joe Hobson for appellant.'

J. W. Howard for appellee.

Opinion op the Court by

Van Sant,' Commissioner

Reversing.

■ The opinion on the first appeal appears in 298 Ky. 638, 183 S. W. 2d 822. The original judgment- entered November 18, 1940, was reversed, with directions that the amount chargeable to the appellant on that appeal, *770who is the appellee on this appeal, be reduced from Two Thousand Seven Hundred Two Dollars and Twenty-Eight Cents ($2,702.28) to One Thousand Six Hundred Fifty-Eight Dollars and Twenty-Eight Cents ($1,658.28). On return of the case, the Special Judge followed the direction of this Court, but refused to allow interest from the date of the original judgment.. This was error. The effect of the decision on the first appeal was to uphold the judgment of the lower Court to the extent of $1,-658.28; and, since interest runs from the date of the judgment, interest on this amount should have been allowed in the judgment entered by the Special Judge. KBS 360.040.

On the original appeal, complaint was made of the 1940 judgment directing the sale of an oil and gas lease. The opinion mentioned the fact that this complaint was made, but did not discuss the question. Since the opinion did not specifically reverse the judgment in that respect, and- did not reserve the question, the effect was to affirm that part of the judgment. Appalachian Stave Co. v. Pickard, 266 Ky. 565, 99 S. W. 2d 472. The Special Judge refused to enforce the order of sale, conceiving that he had no jurisdiction of the question. Here, again, we think he was in error. The order directing the sale of the lease, having been affirmed by this Court on the original appeal, was conclusive of the rights of the parties in respect to the sale of the lease,, and appellant is entitled to have that order enforced.

On return of the case, the judgment herein appealed from will be set aside, and another entered in conformity with this opinion.

Judgment reversed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 16.1

                 [LETTERHEAD OF HOYMAN, DOBSON & COMPANY, P.A.]


                                 March 24, 2003


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549

Re:      Summit Brokerage Services, Inc., a Florida corporation

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We were previously the independent accountants for the Company and on
February 27, 2001, we reported on the financial statements of the Company for
the calendar years ended December 31, 1999 and 2000. On or about October 4,
2001, the client-auditor relationship between the Company and Hoyman, Dobson &
Company, P.A. ceased.

         We have read the Company's statements included under Item 8 of its
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 and we
agree with such statements.



/s/ Hoyman, Dobson & Company, P.A.
#### East River Savings Bank, Respondent, v. Beatrice De Tavara, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 778.]
#### § 158.7 Allowance for reduction or loss of merchandise by a natural force or by leakage.

Merchandise subject to ad valorem, specific, or compound rates of duty found at the time of importation to be reduced or diminished by a natural force, such as evaporation, or by leakage, shall be appraised in its condition as imported, with an allowance made in the value, weight, quantity, or measure to the extent of the reduction or loss, except when forbidden by law or regulation.

(R.S. 251, as amended, sec. 499, sec. 624, 46 Stat. 728, as amended, 759 (19 U.S.C. 66, 1499, 1624))

[T.D. 78-448, 43 FR 53713, Nov. 17, 1978]
§ 9.2 Policy. ( a ) FEMA shall take no action unless and until the requirements of this regulation are complied with.
( b ) The Agency will provide leadership in floodplain management and the protection of wetlands, informed by the best available and actionable science, to bolster the resilience of communities and Federal assets against the impacts of flooding, which are anticipated to increase over time due to the effects of changing conditions which adversely affect the environment, economic prosperity, public health and safety, and national security.
( c ) The Agency shall integrate the goals of the Orders to the greatest possible degree into its procedures for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*).
( d ) The Agency shall: ( 1 ) Minimize the impact of floods on human health, safety, and welfare;
( 2 ) Avoid long- and short-term adverse impacts associated with the occupancy and modification of floodplains and the destruction and modification of wetlands;
( 3 ) Avoid direct and indirect support of floodplain development and new construction in wetlands wherever there is a practicable alternative;
( 4 ) Reduce the risk of flood loss;
( 5 ) Promote the use of nonstructural flood protection methods to reduce the risk of flood loss;
( 6 ) Minimize the destruction, loss, or degradation of wetlands;
( 7 ) Restore and preserve the natural and beneficial values served by floodplains;
( 8 ) Preserve and enhance the natural values of wetlands;
( 9 ) Involve the public throughout the floodplain management and wetlands protection decision-making process;
( 10 ) Adhere to the objectives of the Unified National Program for Floodplain Management; and
( 11 ) Improve and coordinate the Agency's plans, programs, functions, and resources so that the Nation may attain the widest range of beneficial uses of the environment without degradation or risk to health and safety.
[45 FR 59526, Sept. 9, 1980, as amended at 89 FR 57038, July 11, 2024]
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 98-38 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson October 9, 1998

OFFICE: (817) 860-8128

PAGER: (888) 876-2331

E-MAIL: bwh@nrc.gov

SCOTT SCHWIND ASSIGNED RESIDENT INSPECTOR

FOR NRC AT COMANCHE PEAK

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has assigned Scott Schwind as resident

inspector at the Comanche Peak nuclear power plant near Glen Rose, Texas. Mr. Schwind

assumed his post on September 27.

Mr. Schwind graduated from West Texas State University in 1989 with a bachelor of

science degree in mathematics and physics. Following graduation he served as a U.S. Naval

officer aboard the nuclear submarine USS Woodrow Wilson (SSBN 624). He then worked for

the Department of Energy as a system engineer at the Pantex plant near Amarillo.

Mr. Schwind joined the NRC in March 1997 as a reactor engineer at the agency’s

Region I office in King of Prussia, Penn., and has served as a resident inspector at the Indian

Point Nuclear Power Station in Buchanan, New York. At Comanche Peak he joins Tony Gody,

the senior resident inspector, and will reside in Godley, Texas.

###
```

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sunburst Acquisitions III, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending August 31, 2006,
(the "Report"), I, Scott MacCaughern, Principal Executive Officer and
Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)     The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the Company's financial position and results of
       operations.

November 29, 2006

/S/ Scott MacCaughern
Principal Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director
```
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-81 July 10, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC, CONNECTICUT HOSPITAL TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS

Several apparent violations of Nuclear Regulatory

Commission requirements at Windham Community Memorial Hospital

in Willimantic, Conn., will be discussed by agency staff and

hospital representatives on Monday, July 13. Hatch Hospital

Corporation operates the facility.

The apparent violations involve the hospital’s nuclear

medicine program and were identified during a routine NRC

inspection conducted at the hospital on May 26 and 27.

The predecisional enforcement conference, which will be

open to the public for observation, will begin at 1 p.m. in the

Public Meeting Room at the NRC Region I office in King of

Prussia, Pa.

Specifically, the apparent infractions include:

ˇ A failure of the hospital’s Radiation Safety Committee,

which oversees the use of radioactive materials at the

facility, to review the board certifications or permits of

individuals prior to permitting them to work as authorized

users.

ˇ A failure to use radioactive materials as authorized by

license.

ˇ A failure to instruct appropriate personnel in the

applicable regulations and license conditions prior to the

start of their duties.

ˇ A failure to maintain records, as required, for surveys

and for waste disposal.

At the predecisional enforcement conference, hospital

officials will have an opportunity to provide their perspective

on the apparent violations, discuss their causes and safety

significance, and detail any corrective actions that have been

taken in response.

No decision on whether the NRC will take any

enforcement action will be made at this session. That decision

will be made by NRC officials at a later time, usually within

about 30 days.

#