alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-00-56 September 22, 2000

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH HATCH NUCLEAR OFFICIALS

TO DISCUSS INITIAL PLANT LICENSE RENEWAL INSPECTION

Officials from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with Southern Nuclear Operating

Company management at 1:00 p.m. (EDT) on Thursday, October 5 at the Hatch nuclear power plant

visitor center near Baxley, Georgia, to discuss results of the NRC’s initial inspection of the plant’s

license renewal program.

The meeting is open to observation by the public, and NRC officials will be available at its

conclusion to answer questions from interested observers.

NRC officials said the agency’s initial inspection of the Hatch license renewal program, conducted

from September 11-15 of this year, indicated that the company has properly set the scope of key plant

systems, structures and components and is correctly implementing the methodology for screening them

as described in its renewal application, submitted to the NRC this past February 29, for the two-unit

plant.

NRC officials will discuss the license renewal process and the schedule for plant Hatch.

Luis A. Reyes, administrator of the NRC’s Region II office in Atlanta, said the agency’s initial

inspection is the first of three license renewal reviews and was conducted to verify that the company’s

license renewal program is implemented consistent with its license renewal application and pertinent

regulations. He said subsequent NRC inspections will verify that programs are in place to manage the

material condition of the plant’s systems, structures and components.

The full inspection report is due to be issued by November 19 and will be posted on the NRC’s

internet web page at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/reports/renewal.htm

##
§ 165.28 Assessments of duties owed; other actions. ( a ) *Effect on liquidation.* For entries of covered merchandise that are already liquidated when an affirmative determination is made as to evasion under § 165.27, CBP will initiate or continue any appropriate actions separate from this proceeding. For entries of covered merchandise that are unliquidated: ( 1 ) *Suspension of liquidation.* ( i ) CBP will suspend the liquidation of unliquidated entries of covered merchandise that is subject to the determination and that entered on or after the date of the initiation of the investigation under § 165.15 with respect to such covered merchandise; or
( ii ) If CBP has already suspended the liquidation of such entries pursuant to § 165.24, then CBP will continue to suspend their liquidation.
( 2 ) *Extension of liquidation.* ( i ) If liquidation is not suspended, then CBP will extend the period for liquidating the unliquidated entries of covered merchandise that is subject to the determination, pursuant to CBP's authority under section 504(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1504(b)); or
( ii ) If CBP has already extended the period for liquidating such entries pursuant to § 165.24, then CBP will continue to extend the period for liquidating such entries.
( b ) *Notification to the Department of Commerce.* If CBP makes a determination under § 165.27 that covered merchandise was entered into the customs territory of the United States through evasion, CBP will notify the Department of Commerce of the determination and request, if necessary, that the Department of Commerce: ( 1 ) Identify the applicable antidumping or countervailing duty assessment rates for merchandise covered by the determination; and/or
( 2 ) If no assessment rate is available at the time, identify the applicable cash deposit rate to be applied, with the applicable antidumping or countervailing duty assessment rate to be provided as soon as that rate becomes available.
( c ) *Cash deposits and duty assessment.* CBP will require the posting of cash deposits and assess duties on entries of covered merchandise subject to its affirmative determination of evasion in accordance with the instructions received from the Department of Commerce.
[81 FR 56482, Aug. 22, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 19261, Mar. 18, 2024]
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-40 November 5, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC MONITORS UNUSUAL EVENT

AT DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is monitoring events surrounding the discovery

early Sunday morning of a device which looked like a bomb at the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant

near San Luis Obispo, Calif.

The faked device was discovered by security officers in a support building at the plant at about

12:30 a.m. Sunday. The building is not near any of the buildings that house the systems and equipment

necessary for reactor safety. The San Luis Obispo Sheriff’s Office responded to the plant with a bomb

technician, who determined that the device was a fake with no explosives. The FBI field office in Los

Angeles was also notified of the event.

The NRC staffed its emergency response center in Arlington, Texas, after Diablo Canyon

operators declared a Notice of Unusual Event (NOUE), the lowest level of alert on the NRC’s fourlevel emergency response scale, at 1:20 a.m. At 2:57 a.m., after the device was determined to be a

fake, Diablo Canyon secured from the NOUE; however, the plant remains in a “security alert” status

while plant security officers search the site to be certain other potential threats do not exist. The NRC

will continue to monitor events from its emergency response center until the search has been

completed.

State and local officials have been notified of all of the activities associated with this event.

FEMA and the FBI have also been informed of Diablo Canyon’s and the NRC’s response.

###
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 1:20-cv-23557-KMW

RAYMOND T. MAHLBERG,

Plaintiff,

v.

FENDI NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

Defendant.

________________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff RAYMOND T. MAHLBERG (“Plaintiff”), and FENDI NORTH AMERICA, 

INC., (Defendant or “Fendi”) (collectively the “Parties”), by and through their respective 

undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate that, based upon the settlement reached by the Parties in 

the above-captioned action, all claims be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear 

its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

Dated: October 7, 2020.

By: ____s/ Acacia Barros, Esq. 

Acacia Barros, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 106277

E-mail: ab@barroslawfirm.com

ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

11120 N1 Kendall Drive, Suite 201

Miami, Florida 33176

Telephone: (305) 639-8381

Facsimile: (786) 364-7327

Attorney for Plaintiff

By: /s/ John Houston Pope

John Houston Pope, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 968595

EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.

1 Beach Dr. SE, Suite 303

St. Petersburg, FL 33701

Tel.: 888-503-8320

875 Third Avenue

New York, NY 10022

Tel: (212) 351-4500

Fax: (212) 878-8600

Case 1:20-cv-23557-KMW Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/07/2020 Page 1 of 1
#### § 190.37 Destruction under CBP supervision.

A claimant may destroy merchandise and obtain unused merchandise drawback by complying with the procedures set forth in § 190.71 relating to destruction.
§ 127.43 Petition of party for surplus proceeds had merchandise been sold. ( a ) *Filing of petition.* Under section 491(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1491(d)), any party who can satisfactorily establish title to or a substantial interest in unclaimed and abandoned merchandise, the title to which has vested in the United States, may file a petition for the amount that would have been payable to the party had the merchandise been sold and a proper claim made under section 493, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1493).
( b ) *When and with whom filed.* The petition may be filed with the port director at whose direction the title to the merchandise was vested in the United States. If the party received notice under § 127.41(b), the petition must be filed within 30 calendar days after the day on which title vested in the United States. If the party can satisfactorily establish that such notice was not received, the party must file the petition within 30 calendar days of learning of the vesting but not later than 90 calendar days from the vesting.
( c ) *Evidence required.* The petition must show the party's title to or interest in the merchandise, and be supported, as appropriate, with the original bill of lading, bill of sale, contract, mortgage, or other satisfactory documentary evidence, or a certified copy of the foregoing. Also, if applicable, the petition must be supported by satisfactoryproof that the petitioner did not receive notice that title to the merchandise would vest in the United States and was in such circumstances as prevented the receipt of notice.
( d ) *Payment of claim.* If the claim of the owner, consignee, or other party having title to or a substantial interest in the merchandise, is properly established as provided in this section, the party may be paid out of the Treasury of the United States the amount that it is believed the party would have received under 19 U.S.C. 1493 had the merchandise been sold and a proper claim for the surplus of the proceeds of sale been made under that provision (*see* § 127.36 of this part). In determining the amount that may have been payable under 19 U.S.C. 1493, given that the merchandise was not in fact sold at public auction under 19 U.S.C. 1491(a), the appraisement of the merchandise, as provided in § 127.41(c), will be taken into consideration. By virtue of the authority delegated to the port director in this matter, any payment made as provided under this paragraph in connection with the filing of a petition under paragraph (b) of this section will be final and conclusive on all parties.
( e ) *Doubtful claim.* Any doubtful claim for payment along with all pertinent documents and information available to the port director will be forwarded to the Assistant Commissioner, Office of Administration, for instructions. The decision of the Assistant Commissioner, Office of Administration, with respect to any petition filed under this section will be final and conclusive on all parties.
[T.D. 02-65, 67 FR 68034, Nov. 8, 2002, as amended by CBP Dec. 12-21, 77 FR 73309, Dec. 10, 2012]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      14,528,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     207,064,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             7,200,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                111,728,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     147,722,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       147,804,000
<LOANS>                                    169,202,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                 (2,762,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             351,888,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 292,159,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                28,600,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,314,000
<LONG-TERM>                                 10,304,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,675,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,386,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             351,888,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             11,033,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            6,221,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               334,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            17,588,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,284,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,879,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       10,709,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  102,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             266,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             10,327,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,568,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,054,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,054,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.01
<LOANS-NON>                                    206,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,678,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   23,000
<RECOVERIES>                                     7,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,762,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,762,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-167 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of

19


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-167 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 2 of

19


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-167 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 3 of

19


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-167 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 4 of

19


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-167 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 5 of

19


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-167 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 6 of

19


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-167 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 7 of

19


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-167 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 8 of

19


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-167 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 9 of

19


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-167 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 10 of

19


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-167 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 11 of

19


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-167 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 12 of

19


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-167 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 13 of

19


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-167 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 14 of

19


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-167 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 15 of

19


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-167 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 16 of

19


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-167 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 17 of

19


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-167 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 18 of

19


Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-167 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 19 of

19
§ 131.460 Restricted and prohibited costs. SBA prohibitions are consistent with those set forth in 2 CFR part 200. ( a ) A WBC may not use project funds as collateral for a loan, assign an interest in them, or use them for any other such monetary purpose.
( b ) Use of project funds in violation of these restrictions may be cause for termination, suspension, or non-renewal of the cooperative agreement.
#### § 115.48 General.

This subpart provides for the approval and certification of individual road vehicles that comply with the technical requirements in § 115.51.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. III-02-008 March 27, 2002

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

 

NRC TO MEET WITH EXELON GENERATION CO. APRIL 2 TO DISCUSS 

QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION PERFORMANCE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Exelon Generation

Co. in Bettendorf, Iowa, on Tuesday, April 2, to discuss the results of the agency's annual assessment

of safety performance at the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station. The two-reactor facility is located

near Cordova, Illinois.

The meeting, which will be the open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 2

p.m. in the Mozart 1 Conference Room at the Lodge (formerly Jumerís Castle Lodge), Spruce Hills

Drive and Utica Ridge Road, Bettendorf, Iowa. Before the meeting is concluded, NRC officials will

answer questions from members of the public.

The performance period to be discussed is April 1 through December 31 of last year.

A letter sent from the NRC Region III office to Exelon addresses plant performance during the

period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/quad_2001q4.pdf

Current performance information for the Quad Cities facility is available on the NRC web site

at: (Unit 1) http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/QUAD1/quad1_chart.html and (Unit 2)

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/QUAD2/quad2_chart.html

# # #
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-01-038 July 12, 2001

CONTACT: Breck Henderson 

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH AMEREN/UE TO DISCUSS

SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT CALLAWAY NUCLEAR STATION

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of Ameren/UE on

Thursday, July 19, to discuss the results of NRC's annual assessment of safety performance at the

Callaway Nuclear Station near Fulton, Missouri.

The meeting will be held at 7 p.m. at Capitol Plaza Hotel, 415 W. McCarty St., Jefferson City,

Mo. The public is invited to observe the meeting. NRC officials will be available after the meeting to

answer questions.

A letter sent from NRC Region IV to Ameren/UE, which addresses plant safety performance

during the previous year and forms the basis of the meeting discussion, is available from the Region IV

Office of Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr/. Current safety

performance information for Callaway is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CALL/call_chart.html .

###
#### Theresa Torre, as Administratrix of the Estate of Emilio Torre, Deceased, Respondent, v. Compania Sud Americana De Vapores, Also Known as Chilean Line, Appellant, and John W. McGrath Corporation, Impleaded Defendant-Respondent.

Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Stay granted until the granting or final refusal by the Court of Appeals of leave to appeal. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Nolan, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 973.]
#### § 191.1 Authority of the Commissioner of CBP.

Pursuant to DHS Delegation number 7010.3, the Commissioner of CBP has the authority to prescribe, and pursuant to Treasury Department Order No. 100-16 (set forth in the appendix to part 0 of this chapter), the Secretary of the Treasury has the sole authority to approve, rules and regulations regarding drawback.

[USCBP-2018-0029, 83 FR 65064, Dec. 18, 2018]
#### Maurice Deiches, as Receiver, v. Western Development Company.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs, unless appellant comply with terms stated in order. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector ABREGO-VILLARREAL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40268.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 2, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

A jury convicted Hector Abrego-Villareal (Abrego) of importation of, and possession with intent to distribute, more than five kilograms of cocaine. Abrego contends that the evidence was insufficient to prove he knew cocaine was concealed in the car he owned and was driving. The circumstantial evidence, viewed with its reasonable inferences in a light favorable to the verdict, supported the jury’s conclusion that Abrego was aware of the concealed cocaine. *See Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). The evidence included Abrego’s false or inconsistent statements to law enforcement agents concerning his travel documents and travel history, recent alterations made to the car, the value of the concealed cocaine, and Abrego’s assertions that he had not loaned anyone the car except for a “few minutes” at lunch time on an unspecified date. *See United State v. Ramos-Garcia,*184 F.3d 463, 466 (5th Cir.1999) (high value of contraband); *United States v. Ortega Reyna,*148 F.3d 540, 544 (5th Cir. 1998) (other factors). Because the evidence was sufficient for a rational jury to infer Abrego’s guilty knowledge, his conviction is affirmed.

Abrego contends that the district court abused its discretion by ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release. This claim is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because it is not ripe for review. *See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir.2005).

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.