alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 308.2 Performance awards. ( a ) A Recipient of Investment Assistance under parts 305 or 307 of this chapter may receive a performance award in connection with an Investment made on or after the date of enactment of section 215 of PWEDA in an amount not to exceed 10 percent of the amount of the Investment award.
( b ) To receive a performance award, a Recipient must demonstrate Project performance in one or more of the areas listed in this paragraph, weighted at the discretion of the Assistant Secretary: ( 1 ) Meet or exceed the Recipient's projection of jobs created;
( 2 ) Meet or exceed the Recipient's projection of private sector capital invested;
( 3 ) Meet or exceed target dates for Project start and completion stated at the time of Investment approval;
( 4 ) Fulfill the application evaluation criteria set forth in § 301.8 of this chapter; or
( 5 ) Demonstrate other unique Project performance characteristics as determined by the Assistant Secretary.
( c ) A Recipient may receive a performance award no later than three years following the Project's closeout.
( d ) A performance award may fund up to 100 percent of the cost of an eligible Project or any other authorized activity under PWEDA. For the purpose of meeting the non-Federal share requirement of PWEDA or any other statute, the amount of a performance award shall be treated as non-Federal funds.
( e ) The applicable FFO will set forth the requirements, qualifications, guidelines and procedures for performance awards to be made during the applicable fiscal year, with all performance awards being subject to the availability of funds.
[71 FR 56675, Sept. 27, 2006, as amended at 75 FR 4265, Jan. 27, 2010; 79 FR 76136, Dec. 19, 2014]
### MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

FAA - 2010 - 1301 Docket Number

20 10 - SW - 008 - AD Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained

in the Supplemental AD Docket ASB No . MD He licopters Service Bulletin SB900 - 110R1, dated December 3, 2008.
**MA Y BE VIEWED AT:**  Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer


(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




I, Don M. Gibson, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc.;





2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report  .  ;





4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;





b) [Reserved  not effective]





c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and





d) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.




Date: September 26, 2003

/s/ Don M. GibsonDon M. GibsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 5

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 208-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2022 Page 1 of 3
“Gaceta Oficial” No. 131 dated July 7, 1961, page 13204

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 208-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2022 Page 2 of 3
“Gaceta Oficial” No. 131 dated July 7, 1961, page 13205

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 208-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2022 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 10.9


                                                             RAD & ASSOCIATES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                711 North McKinley Road Suite 6
                                                          Lake Forest, IL 60045
                                                               Tel 847-535-9702
                                                               Fax 847-535-9614
                                                   email richarddrexler@msn.com


MEMO

DATE:      November 18, 2002
TO:        Tac Kensler
FROM:      Richard Drexler
SUBJECT:   Richard Drexler's Compensation

Whereas Quality Products' cash situation is constrained, and whereas the
markets for Multipress' products are not expected to improve appreciably over
the next 6 months, now therefore I, Richard Drexler, Chairman and CEO of
Quality Products, agree as follows:

1.  I will take no compensation for the first fiscal quarter of 2003 and no
    reserve should be accrued in view of the fact that the former CEO, Bruce
    Weaver, will still be receiving a severance distribution during this period.

2.  I will defer my fiscal Q2 2003 compensation until January of 2004, which
    compensation should therefore be accrued on the books.

3.  For Q3 and Q4 of 2003 my compensation should be at the rate of $5,416.67
    per month.

The above represents our complete understanding of my fiscal 2003
compensation which, at $65,000 annually, is $10,000 less than the prior CEO.

In event of my death or inability to function the Q2 fiscal 2003 payments
will become immediately due and payable to my wife, Clare Drexler.


/s/ Richard Drexler                         11/18/02
-----------------------                   ------------
Richard Drexler                           Date


/s/ Edith T. Overs                          11/18/02
-----------------------                   ------------
Notary                                    Date

[SEAL]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40923

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ADOLFO GALVEZ-PEREZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:14-CR-143-1

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Adolfo Galvez-Perez pleaded guilty to being found unlawfully present in 

the United States following removal. He was sentenced below the 

recommended Sentencing Guidelines range to 30 months of imprisonment. 

The parties agree that the judgment of conviction improperly reflects that he 

was convicted and sentenced under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). See United States v. 

Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 368 (5th Cir. 2009). Because Galvez-

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 22, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-40923 Document: 00513053016 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/22/2015
No. 14-40923

Perez’s offense was a § 1326(b)(1) violation rather than a § 1326(b)(2) violation, 

we REMAND for the limited purpose of reforming the judgment to reflect the 

proper statute of conviction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106. In all other respects, the 

judgment is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 14-40923 Document: 00513053016 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/22/2015
#### § 19.200 Application.

Except as provided in §§ 19.205 through 19.235(a), these Title IX regulations apply to every recipient and to each education program or activity operated by such recipient that receives Federal financial assistance.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Lathrop Brown, Respondent, v. William H. Miller and Others, as Members of and Together Constituting the Board of Inspectors of Elections of Election District No. 14, Town of Brookhaven, County of Suffolk, and Others, Respondents. Frederick C. Hicks, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 12.)

The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Order modified in accordance with opinion in *People ex rel. Brown*v. *Freisch, No. 1 (ante,*p. 370), decided herewith, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before the presiding justice.
#### Joan WOJCIECHOWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BELL ATLANTIC NETWORK SERVICES, INCORPORATED; Bell Atlantic Maryland, Incorporated; Holly Fry; Theresa Beck; Linda Pabst, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-2164.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 27, 2002.

Decided May 29, 2002.

*380Robin R. Cockey, Cockey, Brennan & Maloney, P.C., Salisbury, Maryland, for Appellant. R. Michael Smith, Dechert, Price & Rhoads, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Joan Wojcieehowski appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Wojciechowski v. Bell Atlantic Network Servs., Inc.,*No. CA-99-3766-L (D.Md. Aug. 29, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### W. Russell Root, Individually, etc., v. Walter Pulitzer and Others. (2 cases.)

Motions granted unless appellants comply with terms stated in orders. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 142.32 When does the initial decision of the ALJ become final? ( a ) The initial decision of the ALJ becomes the final decision of SBA, and shall be binding on all parties 30 days after it is issued, unless any party timely files a motion for reconsideration or any defendant adjudged to have submitted a false claim or statement timely appeals to the SBA Administrator, as set forth in § 142.33.
( b ) If the ALJ disposes of a motion for reconsideration by denying it or by issuing a revised initial decision, the ALJ's order on the motion for reconsideration becomes the final decision of SBA 30 days after the order is issued, unless a defendant adjudged to have submitted a false claim or statement timely appeals to the Administrator, within 30 days of the ALJ's order, as set forth in § 142.33.
### §6535. Compensation of Parliamentarian of Senate

The Parliamentarian of the Senate may be paid at a maximum annual rate of compensation not to exceed $39,000.

(Aug. 5, 1955, ch. 568, 69 Stat. 499; June 27, 1956, ch. 453, 70 Stat. 356; Pub. L. 93–371, §4, Aug. 13, 1974, 88 Stat. 429; Pub. L. 94–59, title I, §105, July 25, 1975, 89 Stat. 275; Pub. L. 116–94, div. E, title II, §212(a)(3)(A), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2775.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 61b of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–94 repealed Pub. L. 94–59, §105. See 1975 Amendment note below.

1975—Pub. L. 94–59, which substituted "$39,000" for "$37,620", effective July 1, 1975, was repealed by Pub. L. 116–94. See above.

1974—Pub. L. 93–371 substituted provisions authorizing a maximum annual rate of compensation not to exceed $37,620 for Parliamentarian, for provisions authorizing a gross annual compensation of $15,500 for Parliamentarian and $7,620 for Assistant Parliamentarian, effective July 1, 1974.

1956—Act June 27, 1956, increased compensation of Parliamentarian of Senate from $8,820 basic annual compensation to $15,500 gross annual compensation, and basic annual compensation of Assistant Parliamentarian of Senate from $7,260 to $7,620, effective July 1, 1956.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2019 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–94 effective on the later of the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2020, or the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after Dec. 20, 2019, see section 212(c) of Pub. L. 116–94, set out as a note under section 282b of this title.

#### 1974 Adjustment in Compensation Not To Supersede Adjustments in Compensation or Limitations by President Pro Tempore of the Senate

Adjustment in compensation by Pub. L. 93–371 not to supersede order of President pro tempore of the Senate authorizing higher rate of compensation or any authority of the President pro tempore to adjust rates of compensation or limitations under section 4 of the Federal Pay Comparability Act of 1970, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–371, set out in part as a note under section 273 of this title.

#### Increases in Compensation

Increases in compensation for Senate officers and employees under authority of Federal Salary Act of 1967 (Pub. L. 90–206) and Federal Pay Comparability Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 91–656), see section 4571 of this title, and Salary Directives of President pro tempore of the Senate set out as notes under that section.

#### Secretary of Senate To Fix Compensation of Assistant Parliamentarian

Pub. L. 86–213, Sept. 1, 1959, 73 Stat. 443, authorized Secretary of Senate to fix compensation of Assistant Parliamentarian, on and after Sept. 1, 1959, at not to exceed $7,620 basic per annum. See section 6539 of this title.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tufco Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: May 14, 2004
    
    /s/ Michael B. WheelerMichael B. WheelerVice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Registrant for the year ended December
31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Consolidated
Financial Statements contained in the Registrant's annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,080
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,206
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    255,576
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               272,862
<PP&E>                                           5,946
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 328,892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,639
<BONDS>                                        163,853
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              115
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,503
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   328,892
<SALES>                                        491,714
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               491,714
<CGS>                                          411,011
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  411,011
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                53,561
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,845
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,086
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,701
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,385
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,385
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.51


</TABLE>
### §2050. Transfer of appropriations for management personnel and miscellaneous restaurant expenses to special deposit account

Appropriations under this heading for management personnel and miscellaneous restaurant expenses on and after October 7, 1997, shall be transferred at the beginning of each fiscal year to the special deposit account in the United States Treasury established under section 2044 of this title, and effective October 1, 1997, all management personnel of the Senate Restaurant facilities shall be paid from the special deposit account. Management personnel transferred hereunder shall be paid at the same rates of pay applicable immediately prior to the date of transfer, and annual and sick leave balances shall be credited to leave accounts of such personnel in the Senate Restaurants.

(Pub. L. 105–55, title I, Oct. 7, 1997, 111 Stat. 1189.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Appropriations under this heading, referred to in text, probably means appropriations under the headings "ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL", "Capital Buildings and Grounds", and "senate office buildings" in the annual Legislative Branch Appropriations Act.

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 174j–10 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

Section is from the Congressional Operations Appropriations Act, 1998, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1998.
### §6504. Committee on Rules and Administration; designation of employees to approve vouchers for payments from Senate contingent fund

The Committee on Rules and Administration may authorize its chairman to designate any employee or employees of such Committee to approve in his behalf, all vouchers making payments from the contingent fund of the Senate, such approval to be deemed and held to be approval by the Committee on Rules and Administration for all intents and purposes.

(Pub. L. 93–145, Nov. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 529; Pub. L. 97–51, §126, Oct. 1, 1981, 95 Stat. 965; Pub. L. 98–473, title I, §123A(c), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1970.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 68–1 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–473 substituted "any employee or employees of such Committee" for "the committee Auditor and the committee Assistant Auditor".

1981—Pub. L. 97–51 substituted "the committee Auditor and the committee Assistant Auditor" for "one committee employee".
### §1869. Advance payments

During fiscal year 2008 and each succeeding fiscal year, following notification of the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate, the Architect of the Capitol may make payments in advance for obligations of the Office of the Architect of the Capitol for subscription services if the Architect determines it to be more prompt, efficient, or economical to do so.

(Pub. L. 110–161, div. H, title I, §1304, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2242.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2008, which is div. H of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008.
§ 61.10 Requirements for issuance or renewal of flood insurance coverage. FEMA will not issue or renew flood insurance unless FEMA receives: ( a ) The full amount due (including applicable premiums, surcharges, and fees); and
( b ) A complete application, including the information necessary to establish a premium rate for the policy, or submission of corrected or additional information necessary to calculate the premium for the renewal of the policy.
[85 FR 43958, July 20, 2020]
### §74a–8. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 74a–8 was editorially reclassified as section 5161 of this title.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle, IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. III-01-048 October 29, 2001

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC CITES NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY FOR SAFETY VIOLATION

AT PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has determined that a violation of NRC regulations at the

Palisades Nuclear Power Plant should be characterized as ìwhite,î meaning that it is an issue with low

to moderate safety significance, but one which may require additional NRC inspections. The plant,

located near Covert, Michigan, is operated by the Nuclear Management Company.

The violation concerned the inadequate number and spacing of smoke detectors in the plantís

cable spreading room.

Under the safety significance determination process, NRC officials classify certain conditions

at nuclear power plants as being one of four colors which delineate increasing levels of safety

significance, beginning with green and progressing to white, yellow or red.

The violation was identified during an NRC inspection that was completed on August 17, 2001. 

The Nuclear Management Company did not contest the ìwhiteî characterization of the safety

significance of this finding and officials chose not to meet with the NRC staff.

The Nuclear Management Company has taken compensatory measures to address the problem

until permanent corrective actions are completed. The NRC plans to conduct a follow-up inspection

on this issue early next year.

The company has until November 9 to appeal the NRCís finding.

 # # #