alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 724 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 724

To require the Federal Communications Commission to make the provision 
      of Wi-Fi access on school buses eligible for E-rate support.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 11, 2021

 Mr. Lujan (for himself, Mr. Graham, Ms. Cortez Masto, Mr. Whitehouse, 
   Mr. Booker, Mr. Markey, Mr. Wyden, and Ms. Sinema) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Federal Communications Commission to make the provision 
      of Wi-Fi access on school buses eligible for E-rate support.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. E-RATE SUPPORT FOR SCHOOL BUS WI-FI.

    (a) Definition.--In this section, the term ``school bus'' means a 
passenger motor vehicle that is--
            (1) designed to carry a driver and not less than 5 
        passengers; and
            (2) used significantly to transport early child education, 
        elementary school, or secondary school students to or from 
        school or an event related to school.
    (b) Rulemaking.--Notwithstanding the limitations under paragraphs 
(1)(B) and (2)(A) of section 254(h) of the Communications Act of 1934 
(47 U.S.C. 254(h)) regarding the authorized recipients and uses of 
discounted telecommunications services, not later than 180 days after 
the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal Communications 
Commission shall commence a rulemaking to make the provision of Wi-Fi 
access on school buses eligible for support under the E-rate program of 
the Commission set forth under subpart F of part 54 of title 47, Code 
of Federal Regulations.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23342]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Training Grant Applications 
Subcommittee Meeting.
    Date: November 8, 2004.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Select Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Ave., 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Kishena C. Wadhwani, PhD, MPH, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, 9000 Rockville Pike, 
MSC 7510, 6100 Building, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-7510, (301) 
496-1485, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#215640454956404f4a614c40484d0f4f48490f464e57"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ee998f8a86998f8085ae838f8782c0808786c0898198">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 12, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-23342 Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-23287-CIV-GAYLES/OTAZO-REYES

LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

IMPERIAL BRANDS PLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

______________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION TO RESET/EXTEND DATE FOR 

PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS WPP PLC’S, 

YOUNG & RUBICAM LLC’S, AND BCW LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND FOR OTHER RELIEF 

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Agreed Motion to Reset/Extend Date 

for Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants WPP plc’s, Young & Rubicam LLC’s, and BCW LLC’s 

(“WPP Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and for Other Relief

(“Motion”) [D.E. 163], and good cause appearing therefore, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

that the Motion is GRANTED. 

Plaintiffs’ response to the WPP Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [D.E. 93] is hereby 

adjourned sine die and the WPP Defendants’ reply to said motion is similarly adjourned sine die. 

The joint status report previously ordered in the Court’s December 6, 2021 Order [D.E. 160] shall 

now be due on the earlier of (i) March 21, 2022, or (ii) ten (10) days after a ruling on Plaintiffs’ 

Motion for Leave to Amend. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 9th day of December, 2021. 

____________________________________ 

ALICIA M. OTAZO-REYES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 165 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/09/2021 Page 1 of 2
2 

cc: United States District Judge Darrin P. Gayles

Counsel of Record 

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 165 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/09/2021 Page 2 of 2
# Official Journal C 282A/15 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 282A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4815 November 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 282A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4815 November 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2005/C 282A/2 | Notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/35 and 36/05 to constitute a reserve of Bulgarian and Romanian-language linguistic administrators (AD 5) in the field of translation.These competitions require university graduate level of education and no professional experience | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2005/C 282A/2

Notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/35 and 36/05 to constitute a reserve of Bulgarian and Romanian-language linguistic administrators (AD 5) in the field of translation.These competitions require university graduate level of education and no professional experience

EPSO/AD/35 and 36/05

(AD 5)

3

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2005/C 282A/3 | Corrigendum to notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/33/05 and EPSO/AD/34/05 to constitute a reserve of Bulgarian and Romanian language conference interpreters (AD 5) ( Official Journal of the European Union C 273 A of 4 November 2005 ) | 19 |

Corrigenda

2005/C 282A/3

Corrigendum to notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/33/05 and EPSO/AD/34/05 to constitute a reserve of Bulgarian and Romanian language conference interpreters (AD 5) ( Official Journal of the European Union C 273 A of 4 November 2005 )

Official Journal of the European Union C 273 A of 4 November 2005

19

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### In the Matter of Arthur Weed, as Executor, etc., Appellant, v. William D. Dickey and Others, as Commissioners, etc., Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-004 January 18, 2002

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: OPA1@NRC.GOV

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC TO MEET WITH NEW JERSEY COMPANY TO DISCUSS SITE CLEANUP PLANS

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will meet with representatives of Heritage Minerals,

Inc., on Tuesday, January 22, to discuss the companyís plans to complete the decommissioning of a

site it owns in Lakehurst, N.J.

 The meeting, which begins at 10:30 a.m., will be held in the Public Meeting Room at the NRC

Region I office, 475 Allendale Road, in King of Prussia, Pa. It will be open to the public for

observation.

 Located off Route 70, the site was used at one time for the mining and processing of local

monazite ores to extract heavy minerals. ASARCO, Inc., began operation at the site in 1973, followed

by Heritage Minerals, which ceased processing operations in August 1990.

 The processing of the ores resulted in a waste pile containing natural thorium and uranium in

sufficient quantities to require an NRC license.

 Most of the material has now been shipped off-site. Heritage Minerals is in the process of

finalizing plans for the removal of any remaining materials and to ensure that the site is adequately

cleaned up.

 ###
§ 113.39 Procedure to remove a surety from Treasury Department Circular 570. If a port director, Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer, or authorized Revenue Division officer is dissatisfied with a surety company because the company has neglected or refused to pay a valid demand made on the surety company's bond or otherwise has failed to honor an obligation on that bond, the port director, Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer, or authorized Revenue Division personnel may take the following steps to recommend that the surety company be removed from Treasury Department Circular 570. ( a ) *Report to Headquarters.* A port director, Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer, or authorized Revenue Division officer will send the following evidence to CBP Headquarters, Attention: Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade: ( 1 ) A copy of the bond in issue;
( 2 ) A copy of the entry or other evidence which shows that there was a default on the bond;
( 3 ) A copy of all notices, demands or correspondence sent to the surety company requesting the honoring of the bond obligation;
( 4 ) A copy of all correspondence from the surety company; and
( 5 ) A written report of the facts known to the port director, Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer, or authorized Revenue Director personnel showing the unsatisfactory performance by the surety company of the bond obligation(s).
( b ) *Review by Headquarters.* CBP Headquarters will review submitted evidence and determine whether further action against the surety company is warranted. If it is determined that further action is warranted, a report recommending appropriate action will be submitted to the Fiscal Assistant Secretary, Department of the Treasury, as required by § 223.18(a), Bureau of the Fiscal Service Regulations (31 CFR 223.18(a)). The port director, Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer, and Director, Revenue Division will be informed in writing of Headquarters action regarding their request for removal of the surety.
[T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41171, Oct. 19, 1984, as amended by T.D. 91-77, 56 FR 46115, Sept. 10, 1991; T.D. 95-77, 60 FR 50020, Sept. 27, 1995; T.D. 99-27, 64 FR 13675, Mar. 22, 1999; CBP Dec. 15-15, 80 FR 70166, Nov. 13, 2015]
Mercer Design Center 

Arrival Checklist 

1. If day and operating out of back of 

vehicle, point vehicle into sun. 

2. Remove case and place on level surface. 

3. Check distance to nearest airport and/or 

controlled airspace using smartphone or 

tablet app. 

4. If required, use VHF aviation transceiver, 

to contact tower of field if closer than 5 

NM. 

5. Inform tower I CTAF of UAS ops, location, 

and max height of flight. 

Preflight Checklist 

1. Remove transmitter. 

2. Router - On 

3. Transmitter - On 

4. Toggle Switches- Full Up 

5. Video Monitor - On 

6. Remove UAS from case. 

7. Gimbal Lock & Lens Cap - Removed 

8. Micro-SO card - Inserted. 

9. UAS Battery - Inserted 

10. Place UAS in clear and safe launch and 

recovery position if it returns to home. 

11. UAS Battery - On 

12. Wifi Connection to Monitor - Verified 

13. DJI Application - Load 

14. DJI application - Connect to Camera 

15. SD Card - Format 

16. Camera - Full Up 

17. Satellite Connections - Verified 

18. Charge Levels - Safe for Flight 

19. Video Recording - Start 

20. Takeoff 

After Takeoff Checklist 

1. Hover approximately ten feet above the 

ground to confirm UAS is under control. 

2. All sticks operate correctly while in hover 

- Verified 

Pre-Landing Checklist 

1. Camera - Full Up 

2. Video Recorder - Stop 

3. Landing Zone - Clear I Safe 

Post-landing Checklist- Returning to 

Flight lmm · ·· · · · 

• • • 

• ~~~ Replace 2. Wifi Connection to Monitor - Verified 

3. DJI application - Connect to Camera 

4. Takeoff 

End of Ops Checklist 

1. Battery - Off 

2. Transmitter - Off 

3. Router - Off 

4. Notify ToweriCTAF - End of Ops
<PAGE>
            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of OMNI Energy Services Corp. of our report dated March 12, 2004,
with respect to the 2003 consolidated financial statements of OMNI Energy
Services Corp. included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004.

         o        Form S-3/A No. 333-115040 (OMNI Energy Services Corp.
                  Registration Statement)

         o        Form S-8 No. 333-110198 (Amended and Restated OMNI Energy
                  Services Corp. Stock Incentive Plan)

         o        Form S-8 No. 333-49409 (OMNI Energy Services Corp. Stock
                  Incentive Plan and Stock Option Agreements with Certain
                  Employees)

         o        Form S-8 No. 333-80973 (OMNI Energy Services Corp. 1999 Stock
                  Option Plan Stock Incentive Plan)

         o        Form S-8 No. 333-35816 (OMNI Energy Services Corp. 1999 Stock
                  Option Plan)

         o        Form S-3 No. 333-69436 (OMNI Energy Services Corp.
                  Registration Statement)



                                             /s/ Fitts Roberts & Co., P.C.

Houston, Texas
April 18, 2005
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-37   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 1 of 2

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-37   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 2 of 2
#### Benz & Cie (Rhenish Automobile and Motor Factory, Inc.), Respondent, *v.*Jesse Froehlich, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the Hew York county clerk’s office on the 7th day of March, 1914, granting a motion for a commission on written interrogatories.

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from should be modified by allowing the defendant either to join in the commission with written cross-interrogatories or to attend and cross-examine the witnesses orally as he shall elect. As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Present—• Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.
#### § 146.2 Port director as Board representative.

The appropriate port director shall be in charge of the zone as the representative of the Board.

[T.D. 86-16, 51 FR 5049, Feb. 11, 1986, as amended by T.D. 99-27, 64 FR 13676, Mar. 22, 1999]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-046 June 26, 2002

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC ISSUES FINDING OF LOW TO MODERATE SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

AT BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff issued its final determination for an inspection

finding at the Beaver Valley nuclear power plant in Shippingport, Pa. The NRC determined the

finding should be characterized as "white," meaning it is an issue of low to moderate importance to

safety. The two-reactor plant is operated by FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company.

At Beaver Valley, the alert and notification system (ANS), which would be used to notify the

public of an emergency at the plant, is made up of two types of devices: pole-mounted sirens and

personal home alerting devices (PHADs). During an August inspection, NRC inspectors determined

that FirstEnergy could not provide early notification to the entire population living within the 10-mileradius emergency planning zone (EPZ). That’s because a majority of the PHADs, which make up a

small portion of the ANS, had not been adequately maintained and tested to ensure they would fulfill

their design function of alerting members of the public in the Beaver Valley EPZ who might not hear

the pole-mounted sirens.

Under its safety significance determination process, NRC officials classify certain conditions at

nuclear power plants as being one of four colors which delineate increasing levels of safety

significance, beginning with “green” and progressing to “white,” “yellow” or “red.”

In an inspection report dated April 12, the NRC characterized the finding as “yellow,” meaning

it is an issue of substantial importance to safety. The letter forwarding that characterization offered the

company the opportunity to meet with the NRC at a regulatory conference to discuss FirstEnergy’s

assessment of the issue. At the conference, FirstEnergy contended that essentially 100 percent of the

ANS was functional and the impact on public health and safety was very low. Specifically, the

company had conducted siren tests near PHAD locations and found that the sirens would provide the

means for early notification in 75 percent of the areas where PHADs were located and, therefore, less

that one percent of the population was potentially affected by PHAD deficiencies. 

After considering the information developed during the inspection and the information

provided by FirstEnergy at the regulatory conference, the NRC concluded that the inspection finding is

more appropriately characterized as “white,” because the majority of the public would be notified
directly by the sirens and functioning PHADs and the rest would likely be alerted by informal alerting

such as television, radio, or “word of mouth.” 

FirstEnergy has taken corrective actions to address this finding, including installation and

testing of additional sirens to eliminate the need for PHADs. 

FirstEnergy has 30 days to contest the NRC’s significance determination. 

###
#### § 12.21 Licensed establishments.

The bringing into the United States for sale, barter, or exchange, of any virus, therapeutic serum, toxin, antitoxin, or analogous product, or arsphenamine or its derivatives (or any other trivalent organic arsenic compound), applicable to the prevention, treatment, or cure of diseases or injuries of man is prohibited unless such virus, serum, toxin, antitoxin, or other product has been manufactured at an establishment holding an unsuspended and unrevoked license issued by the Secretary of Health and Human Services for such manufacture.

[T.D. 69-201, 34 FR 14328, Sept. 12, 1969, as amended by T.D. 82-145, 47 FR 35476, Aug. 16, 1982]
05/14/2012 14:38 FAX 2024835142 FAA + OMS ll!001/001 

Of • fl ~..#.· _21• .1• 

· ~~·'\;\,c!fl'll ,.,'llet, re C7"'J 11'1t11es ,__;~ ,. l J56 DiAblo Road, Suite l03 

Danville, CA 945l6 

'i i \.\ 3: 3 bTel: 92S..J62-4430, Fax: 925-362·4432 ?.n\Z 

May4, 2012 

Federal Aviation Administration 

&00 Independence Avenue, SW 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC·430 

Wilbur Wright Building, Room 2Wt 000 

Washington, DC. 20591 

RE: Case No. 2011WP3S0018 

Dear Sirs: 

tRECEIVED 

MAY 1 0 2012 

l-IEARING DOCKET 

Aero Micronesia, Inc. is doing business as Asia Pacific Airlines. I formally request a hearing in this 

matter in accordancewith Subpart G ofPart 13 ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations with the 

understanding that a complaint will be filed. We request that the hearing be held in Washington, 

DC. I am sending this request to both the FAA attorney and the Federal Aviation Administration at 

800 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington DC. 

Sincerely, 

~~-... --- Michael R. Qui·nn 

President 

Aero Micronesia, Tnc. 

/'"' I ~I . ( ~ • i I •
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-176 November 13, 2000

V.C. SUMMER EVENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON NRC WEB SITE

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is posting information on the October 12 discovery

of a crack in the reactor coolant system piping at South Carolina Electric and Gas Company’s Summer

nuclear power plant near Jenkinsville, South Carolina. The crack was discovered when the plant shut

down in early October for a scheduled refueling outage.

The web site contains background information, news releases, public meeting notices, reference

documents and inspection reports in one convenient location at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/REACTOR/SUMMER/index.htm on the agency’s web site.

Recently added to the web site are: (1) the licensee’s October 13 notification to NRC of the

discovery of the crack; (2) an October 13 report on the event prepared at NRC headquarters; (3) NRC

Information Notice (2000-17) dated October 18 that was sent to NRC’s reactor licensees advising them

of the Summer event; (4) the charter for the NRC Special Inspection team; (5) a notice and summary

of the October 25 public meeting between NRC and South Carolina Electric & Gas Company to

discuss planned activities concerning the weld crack; and (6) the October 31 news release announcing

the dispatch of an NRC special inspection team to the plant.

Other pertinent documents will be added as they are completed and become available to the

public.

###