61792 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 203 / Thursday, October 21, 2004 / Notices 

1See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews,

69 FR 24118 (May 3, 2004) (‘‘Notice of Initiation’’).

2 Gallatin, IPSCO, SDI, U.S. Steel and Ispat were 

petitioners in the original investigation.

U.S. sales to that importer (or customer) 

and dividing this amount by the total 

value of the sales to that importer (or 

customer). Where an importer (or 

customer)-specific ad valorem rate was 

greater than de minimis (i.e., 0.5%), we 

calculated a per unit assessment rate by 

aggregating the dumping margins 

calculated for all U.S. sales to that 

importer (or customer) and dividing this 

amount by the total quantity sold to that 

importer (or customer). Where an 

importer (or customer)-specific ad 

valorem rate was de minimis, we will 

order CBP to liquidate appropriate 

entries without regard to antidumping 

duties. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of 

this notice of final results of 

administrative review for all shipments 

of ARG windshields from the PRC 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication, as provided by section 

751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit 

rates for the reviewed companies will be 

the rates shown above except that the 

Department shall require no deposit of 

estimated antidumping duties for firms 

whose weighted-average margins are 

less than 0.5% and therefore de 

minimis; (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not listed above, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the company-specific rate published for 

the most recent period; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the original 

less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recent period 

for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) if neither the 

exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm 

covered in these or any previous 

reviews, the cash deposit rate will be 

the ‘‘all others’’ rate, which is 124.5 

percent. 

These deposit requirements shall 

remain in effect until publication of the 

final results of the next administrative 

review. 

Notification of Interested Parties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumpting duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of the antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties.

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (‘‘APOs’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return/destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

determination and notice in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(I)(1) of 

the Act.

Dated: October 14, 2004. 

Joseph A. Spetrini, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration.

Appendix 1—Issues in the Decision 

Memorandum 

Fuyao’s Comments 

Comment 1: Water as a Separate Component 

of Normal Value 

Comment 2: Certain Inputs as a Separate 

Component of Normal Value 

Shenzhen CSG’s Comments 

Comment 3: Liquidation Instructions for 

Shenzhen CSG’s Entries 

PNA’s Comments 

Comment 4: Proper Set of Sales as Basis for 

the Margin for PNA 

Comment 5: Rejection of Market Purchases 

from Indonesia, Thailand, and South Korea 

Comment 6: Surrogate Profit Ratio 

Comment 7: Allocation of Credit Expense, 

Inventory Carrying Cost, and Marine 

Insurance 

Comment 8: Market-Price Value for Marine 

Insurance 1

Comment 9: Surrogate Value for Metal Clips 

Comment 10: Double-Counting of Labor

[FR Doc. 04–23605 Filed 10–20–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration 

[A–588–846] 

Certain Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled CarbonQuality Steel Products From Japan; 

Final Results of the Expedited Sunset 

Review of Antidumping Duty Order

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of expedited sunset 

review of antidumping duty order on 

certain hot-rolled flat-rolled carbonquality steel products from Japan; Final 

results. 

SUMMARY: On May 3, 2004, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) initiated a sunset review 

of the antidumping duty order of certain 

hot-rolled flat-rolled carbon-quality 

steel products (‘‘hot-rolled steel’’) from 

Japan.1 On the basis of the notice of 

intent to participate, adequate 

substantive comments filed on behalf of 

the domestic interested parties, and 

inadequate response from respondent 

interested parties, (in this case, no 

response) the Department conducted an 

expedited sunset review of the 

antidumping duty order pursuant to 

section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended, and section 

351.218(c)(1)(ii)(B) of the Department’s 

regulations. As a result of this sunset 

review, the Department determined that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

order would likely lead to continuation 

or recurrence of dumping at the levels 

listed below in the section entitled 

‘‘Final Results of Review’’.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 21, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Martha V. Douthit, Office of Policy, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–5050.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 3, 2004, the Department 

initiated a sunset review of the 

antidumping duty order on hot-rolled 

steel products from Japan in accordance 

with section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). See 

Notice of Initiation, 69 FR 24118 (May 

3, 2004). 

The Department received Notices of 

Intent to Participate within the 

applicable deadline specified in section 

351.218(d)(1)(i) of the Department’s 

regulations on behalf of Nucor 

Corporation (‘‘Nucor’’), United States 

Steel Corporation (‘‘U.S. Steel’’), 

International Steel Group, Inc. (‘‘ISG’’), 

Gallatin Steel Company (‘‘Gallatin’’), 

IPSCO Steel Inc. (‘‘IPSCO’’), Steel 

Dynamics, Inc. (‘‘SDI’’), and Ispat Inland 

Inc. (‘‘Ispat’’), a division of Ispat Inland 

Flat Products, (collectively ‘‘domestic 

interested parties’’).2 The domestic 

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 203 / Thursday, October 21, 2004 / Notices 61793

interested parties claimed interestedparty status as manufacturers of subject 

merchandise as defined by section 

771(9)(C) of the Act.

The Department received complete 

substantive responses from the domestic 

interested parties within the 30-day 

deadline specified in the Department’s 

regulations under section 

351.218(d)(3)(i). However, the 

Department did not receive any 

responses from respondent interested 

parties to this proceeding. As a result, 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(c)(2), 

the Department conducted an expedited 

sunset review of this antidumping duty 

order. 

Scope of the Antidumping Duty Order 

See Appendix 1. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this sunset review 

are addressed in the ‘‘Issues and 

Decision Memorandum’’ (’’Decision 

Memo’’) from Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Director, Office of Policy, Import 

Administration, to Jeffrey A. May, 

Acting Assistant Secretary, or Import 

Administration, dated October 15, 2004, 

which is hereby adopted by this notice. 

The issues discussed in the Decision 

Memo include the likelihood of 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and the magnitude of the margin likely 

to prevail if the antidumping duty order 

were revoked. Parties can find a 

complete discussion of all issues raised 

in this sunset review and the 

corresponding recommendations in this 

public memo, which is on file in the 

Central Records Unit, room B–099 of the 

main Department Building. 

In addition, a complete version of the 

Decision Memo can be accessed directly 

on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn,

under the heading ‘‘October 2004.’’ The 

paper copy and electronic version of the 

Decision Memo are identical in content. 

Final Results of Review 

The Department determines that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

investigation on hot-rolled steel from 

Japan would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

at the following weighted-average 

margins:

Manufacturers/producers/exporters 

Weighted-average 

margin

(percent) 

Kawasaki Steel Corporation ................... 40.26 

Nippon Steel Corporation .......................... 18.37 

NKK Corporation ........ 17.70 

All Others .................... 22.92 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective orders 

(‘‘APOs’’) of their responsibility 

concerning the return or destruction of 

proprietary information disclosed under 

APO in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.305. Timely notification of the 

return or destruction of APO materials 

or conversion to judicial protective 

order is requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751 (c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act.

Dated: October 15, 2004. 

Jeffrey A. May, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration.

Appendix 1 

Scope of the Antidumping Duty Order on 

Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon Quality Steel 

From Japan (A–588–846) 

For purposes of this order, the products 

covered are certain hot-rolled flat-rolled 

carbon-quality steel products of a rectangular 

shape, of a width of 0.5 inch or greater, 

neither clad, plated, nor coated with metal 

and whether or not painted, varnished, or 

coated with plastics or other non-metallic 

substances, in coils (whether or not in 

successively superimposed layers) regardless 

of thickness, and in straight lengths, of a 

thickness less than 4.75 mm and of a width 

measuring at least 10 times the thickness. 

Universal mill plate (i.e., flat-rolled products 

rolled on four faces or in a closed box pass, 

of a width exceeding 150 mm but not 

exceeding 1250 mm and of a thickness of not 

less than 4 mm, not in coils and without 

patterns in relief) of a thickness not less than 

4.0 mm is not included within the scope of 

these investigations. 

Specifically included in this scope are 

vacuum degassed, fully stabilized (commonly 

referred to as interstitial-free (‘‘IF’’) steels, 

high strength low alloy (‘‘HSLA’’) steels, and 

the substrate for motor lamination steels. IF 

steels are recognized as low carbon steels 

with micro-alloying levels of elements such 

as titanium and/or niobium added to 

stabilize carbon and nitrogen elements. 

HSLA steels are recognized as steels with 

micro-alloying levels of elements such as 

chromium, copper, niobium, titanium, 

vanadium, and molybdenum. The substrate 

for motor lamination steels contains microalloying levels of elements such as silicon 

and aluminum. 

Steel products to be included in the scope 

of this order, regardless of Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) 

definitions, are products in which: (1) Iron 

predominates, by weight, over each of the 

other contained elements; (2) the carbon 

content is 2 percent or less, by weight; and 

(3) none of the elements listed below exceeds 

the quantity, by weight, respectively 

indicated: 1.80 percent of manganese, or 1.50 

percent of silicon, or 1.00 percent of copper, 

or 0.50 percent of aluminum, or 1.25 percent 

of chromium, or 0.30 percent of cobalt, or 

0.40 percent of lead, or 1.25 percent of 

nickel, or 0.30 percent of tungsten, or 0.012 

percent of boron, or 0.10 percent of 

molybdenum, or 0.10 percent of niobium, or 

0.41 percent of titanium, or 0.15 percent of 

vanadium, or 0.15 percent of zirconium. All 

products that meet the physical and chemical 

description provided above are within the 

scope of this order unless otherwise 

excluded. The following products, by way of 

example, are outside and/or specifically 

excluded from the scope of this investigation: 

Alloy hot-rolled steel products in which at 

least one of the chemical elements exceeds 

those listed above (including e.g., ASTM 

specifications A543, A387, A514, A517, and 

A506). 

SAE/AISI grades of series 2300 and higher. 

Ball bearing steels, as defined in the 

HTSUS. 

Tool steels, as defined in the HTSUS. 

Silico-manganese (as defined in the 

HTSUS) or silicon electrical steel with a 

silicon level exceeding 1.50 percent. 

ASTM specifications A710 and A736. 

USS abrasion-resistant steels (USS AR 400, 

USS AR 500). 

Hot-rolled steel coil which meets the 

following chemical, physical and mechanical 

specifications:

[In percent] 

C Mn (max) P (max) S (max) Si Cr Cu Ni (max) 

0.10–0.14 0.90 0.025 0.005 0.30–0.50 0.50–0.70 0.20–0.40 0.20 

Width = 44.80 inches maximum; 

Thickness = 0.063–0.198 inches; 

Yield Strength = 50,000 ksi minimum; 

Tensile Strength = 70,000–88,000 psi. Hot-rolled steel coil which meets the 

following chemical, physical and mechanical 

specifications:

61794 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 203 / Thursday, October 21, 2004 / Notices 

[In percent] 

C Mn P (max) S (max) Si Cr Cu (max) Ni (max) Mo (max) 

0.10–0.16 0.70–0.90 0.025 0.006 0.30–0.50 0.50–0.70 0.25 0.20 0.21 

Width = 44.80 inches maximum; 

Thickness = 0.350 inches maximum; 

Yield Strength = 80,000 ksi minimum; 

Tensile Strength = 105,000 psi. Hot-rolled steel coil which meets the 

following chemical, physical and mechanical 

specifications:

[In percent] 

C Mn P (max) S (max) Si Cr Cu Ni (max) V (wt) (max) Cb (max) 

0.10–0.14 1.30–1.80 0.025 0.005 0.30–0.50 0.50–0.70 0.20–0.40 0.20 0.10 0.08 

Width = 44.80 inches maximum; 

Thickness = 0.350 inches maximum; 

Yield Strength = 80,000 ksi minimum; 

Tensile Strength = 105,000 psi Aim. Hot-rolled steel coil which meets the 

following chemical, physical and mechanical 

specifications:

[In percent] 

C (max) Mn (max) P (max) S (max) Si (max) Cr (max) Cu (max) Ni (max) Nb (max) Ca A1 

0.15 1.40 0.025 0.01 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.20 0.005 Treated 0.01–0.07 

Width = 39.37 inches; 

Thickness = 0.181 inches maximum; 

Yield Strength = 70,000 psi minimum for 

thicknesses less than or equal to 0.148 inches 

and 65,000 psi minimum for thicknesses > 

0.148 inches; 

Tensile Strength = 80,000 psi minimum. 

Hot-rolled dual phase steel, phasehardened, primarily with a ferriticmartensitic microstructure, contains 0.9 

percent up to and including 1.5 percent 

silicon by weight, further characterized by 

either (i) tensile strength between 540 N/mm2

and 640 N/mm2 and an elongation percentage 

greater than or equal to 26 percent for 

thicknesses of 2 mm and above, or (ii) a 

tensile strength between 590 N/mm2 and 690 

N/mm2 and an elongation percentage greater 

than or equal to 25 percent for thicknesses of 

2mm and above. 

Hot-rolled bearing quality steel, SAE grade 

1050, in coils, with an inclusion rating of 1.0 

maximum per ASTM E 45, Method A, with 

excellent surface quality and chemistry 

restrictions as follows: 0.012 percent 

maximum phosphorus, 0.015 percent 

maximum sulfur, and 0.20 percent maximum 

residuals including 0.15 percent maximum 

chromium. 

Grade ASTM A570–50 hot-rolled steel 

sheet in coils or cut lengths, width of 74 

inches (nominal, within ASTM tolerances), 

thickness of 11 gauge (0.119 inch nominal), 

mill edge and skin passed, with a minimum 

copper content of 0.20 percent. 

The merchandise subject to this order is 

classified in the HTSUS at subheadings: 

7208.10.15.00, 7208.10.30.00, 7208.10.60.00, 

7208.25.30.00, 7208.25.60.00, 7208.26.00.30, 

7208.26.00.60, 7208.27.00.30, 7208.27.00.60, 

7208.36.00.30, 7208.36.00.60, 7208.37.00.30, 

7208.37.00.60, 7208.38.00.15, 7208.38.00.30, 

7208.38.00.90, 7208.39.00.15, 7208.39.00.30, 

7208.39.00.90, 7208.40.60.30, 7208.40.60.60, 

7208.53.00.00, 7208.54.00.00, 7208.90.00.00, 

7210.70.30.00, 7210.90.90.00, 7211.14.00.30, 

7211.14.00.90, 7211.19.15.00, 7211.19.20.00, 

7211.19.30.00, 7211.19.45.00, 7211.19.60.00, 

7211.19.75.30, 7211.19.75.60, 7211.19.75.90, 

7212.40.10.00, 7212.40.50.00, 7212.50.00.00. 

Certain hot-rolled flat-rolled carbon-quality 

steel covered by this order, including: 

vacuum degassed, fully stabilized; high 

strength low alloy; and the substrate for 

motor lamination steel may also enter under 

the following tariff numbers: 7225.11.00.00, 

7225.19.00.00, 7225.30.30.50, 7225.30.70.00, 

7225.40.70.00, 7225.99.00.90, 7226.11.10.00, 

7226.11.90.30, 7226.11.90.60, 7226.19.10.00, 

7226.19.90.00, 7226.91.50.00, 7226.91.70.00, 

7226.91.80.00, and 7226.99.00.00. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise under order is dispositive.

[FR Doc. 04–23604 Filed 10–20–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration 

[A–588–056] 

Melamine in Crystal Form From Japan: 

Revocation of Antidumping Duty 

Finding

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of revocation of the 

antidumping duty finding on melamine 

in crystal form from Japan. 

SUMMARY: On August 2, 2004, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) initiated a sunset review 

of the antidumping duty finding on 

melamine in crystal form from Japan. 

See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Reviews, 69 FR 46134 (August 2, 2004). 

Because no domestic party responded to 

the sunset review notice of initiation by 

the applicable deadline, the Department 

is revoking the antidumping duty 

finding on melamine in crystal form 

from Japan.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 1, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Martha V. Douthit, Office of Policy, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5050.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 2, 1977, the Treasury 

Department published in the Federal 

Register its antidumping duty finding 

on melamine in crystal form from Japan. 

See 42 FR 6866 (February 2, 1977). On 

September 1, 1999, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.218(f)(4), the Department published 

in the Federal Register notice of 

continuation of the antidumping duty 

finding following the first sunset 

review. See Continuation of 

Antidumping Duty Finding: Melamine 

from Japan, 64 FR 47764 (September 1, 

1999). On August 2, 2004, the 

Department initiated a second sunset 

review of this finding pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended, (the ‘‘Act’’) and 19 CFR 

part 351, in general. See Initiation of 

Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 69 FR 

46134 (August 2, 2004). As a courtesy to 

interested parties, the Department sent 

letters, via certified and registered mail,