alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 23, 2016

s1116 

# Order

Clerk November 23, 2016

153238

KYOCERA CORPORATION,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 153238

COA: 327974

Saginaw CC: 15

- 025786

- CK

HEMLOCK SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 3, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO: 20-81272-CV-MIDDLEBROOKS

NELSON FERNANDEZ, 

Plaintiff,

v.

ELIE’S INC., 

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER CLOSING CASE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with

Prejudice, filed on September 9, 2020. (DE 9). Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, a plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss an action by filing a notice of dismissal before the 

opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(a)(1)(A)(i). Defendant has served neither. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The 

Clerk of Court shall CLOSE THIS CASE. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. 

SIGNED in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida, this 10th day of September, 2020.

Donald M. Middlebrooks

United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 9:20-cv-81272-DMM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2020 Page 1 of 1
### §5145. Lump-sum allowances for House Majority Floor Leader, Minority Floor Leader, Majority Whip, and Minority Whip

(a) Effective with respect to fiscal year 2008 and each succeeding fiscal year, the aggregate amount otherwise authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year for the lump-sum allowance for each of the following offices is increased as follows:

(1) The allowance for the office of the Majority Floor Leader is increased by $200,000.

(2) The allowance for the office of the Minority Floor Leader is increased by $200,000.

(b) Effective with respect to fiscal year 2009 and each succeeding fiscal year, the aggregate amount otherwise authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year for the lump-sum allowance for each of the following offices is increased as follows:

(1) The allowance for the office of the Majority Whip is increased by $72,000.

(2) The allowance for the office of the Minority Whip is increased by $72,000.

(Pub. L. 111–8, div. G, title I, §104, Mar. 11, 2009, 123 Stat. 818.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 74a–10a of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2009, which is div. G of the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009.
###### Editorial Note on Part 152

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 152 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93022, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 152.11 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.

Merchandise shall be classified in accordance with the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202) as interpreted by administrative and judicial rulings.

[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17477, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51269, Dec. 21, 1988]
#### White-Way Arcade, Inc., v. Broadway Turtle King, Inc.

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 957.]
### §§43, 43a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 43, acts July 28, 1866, ch. 296, §17, 14 Stat. 323; Aug. 11, 1993, Pub. L. 103–69, title III, §310(a), 107 Stat. 712, provided for Senators to receive mileage for travel to and from regular sessions, and was omitted from the Code in view of the termination of mileage under this section for Senators by section 1(a) of Pub. L. 104–53, set out below.

Section 43a, acts July 8, 1935, ch. 374, 49 Stat. 459; Aug. 11, 1993, Pub. L. 103–69, title III, §310(b), 107 Stat. 712, provided for President of Senate to be paid mileage, and was omitted from the Code in view of the termination of mileage under this section for President of Senate by section 1(b) of Pub. L. 104–53, set out below.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Mileage for Senators and President of Senate

Pub. L. 104–53, title I, §1, Nov. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 517, provided that:

"(a) On and after October 1, 1995, no Senator shall receive mileage under section 17 of the Act of July 28, 1866 (2 U.S.C. 43).

"(b) On and after October 1, 1995, the President of the Senate shall not receive mileage under the first section of the Act of July 8, 1935 (2 U.S.C. 43a)."
### §74a–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 74a–2 was editorially reclassified as section 4302 of this title.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-28 April 19, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE AT THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of the Three Mile Island

1 nuclear power plant next Tuesday to discuss the results of the agency’s latest Plant Performance

Review for the facility. The plant, which is located in Middletown, Pa., is operated by AmerGen

Energy Company.

Issuance of the reviews was announced in NRC news release 00-059 on April 5. The Plant

Performance Review letter can be found on the agency’s web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr/.

The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, will be held at 2 p.m. at the

plant’s Training Center, Room 118, on Route 441 in Middletown. At its conclusion, NRC staff will be

available to answer questions from interested observers and to meet with state and local officials.

#
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-145 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, October 17, 1996)

NRC ASKS UTILITY LICENSEES FOR INFORMATION ON

CONCRETE CONTAINMENT FOUNDATIONS AT NINE NUCLEAR PLANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has sent letters to

five utility licensees requesting additional information on their

use of porous concrete in containment foundations at nine nuclear

power plants.

The NRC staff has been studying the reported erosion of the

containment foundation basemat at the Millstone 3 Nuclear Power

Plant, operated by Northeast Utilities, in Waterford, Conn.

Based on information gathered by the staff thus far, there is no

immediate safety concern about the Millstone 3 containment

foundation, which is supported on rock. The amount of concrete

that may have eroded since the plant was built in 1975 is only a

small fraction of the total cement weight, and no adverse

consequences have either been observed or predicted. The NRC

staff is continuing its review of this issue in order to ensure

that any potential consequences of this phenomenon are completely

understood.

However, the NRC staff has identified nine other nuclear

plants for which it requires more detailed information on their

use of porous concrete. They are:

ˇ Beaver Valley Units 1 and 2  operated by the Duquesne

Light Co., 17 miles west of McCandless, Pa.

ˇ James A. Fitzpatrick  operated by the New York Power

Authority eight miles northwest of Oswego, N.Y.

ˇ Haddam Neck  operated by Northeast Utilities, 13

miles east of Meriden, Ct.

ˇ North Anna Units 1 and 2  operated by Virginia

Electric & Power Co., 40 miles northwest of Richmond,

Va.

ˇ Perry  operated by the Cleveland Electric

Illuminating Co., seven miles northeast of Painesville,

Ohio.
ˇ Surry Units 1 and 2  operated by the Virginia

Electric & Power Co., 17 miles northwest of Newport News,

Va.

In the letters, dated October 16, the NRC staff asked each

utility to provide information within 14 days on whether they

have found slurry in the drainage below their containment

basemats, and whether they have observed any settlement of the

containment basemats. NRC also asked if they have noticed any

unusual conditions which may be related to the porous concrete

sub-foundation layers and if they are monitoring anything related

to the drainage from the porous concrete sub-foundation layers

below their containment basemats.

#
<Page>

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective
Amendment No. 6 to the registration statement on Form N-4 (No. 333-43799) of our
report dated February 15, 2002, relating to the financial statements of Fortis
Benefits Insurance Company, which appears in the Statement of Additional
Information constituting part of Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to such
registration statement. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our
report dated April 6, 2001, relating to the financial statements of Fortis
Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account D, which appears in such Statement
of Additional Information. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Independent Public Accountants" in such Statement of Additional
Information.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 27, 2002
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 9, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00388

- CR

Raul Aguero AYALA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr Count y, Texas

Trial Court No. B14466

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s pro se brief is presently due January 3, 2017. Appellant has filed a motion for

extension of time, stating that he needs additional time to file his brief. We GRANT appellant an

extension of time to file his pro se brief. Appellant’s brief is due February 1, 2017. Appellant

also requests “legal assistance that is not an attorney.” That request is DENIED.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of December, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of C ourt
### §1304a. Sponsor education and assistance

#### (a) Definition

In this section, the term "CSEC plan" has the meaning given that term in subsection (f)(1) of section 1060 of this title.

#### (b) Education

The Participant and Plan Sponsor Advocate established under section 1304 of this title shall make itself available to assist CSEC plan sponsors and participants as part of the duties it performs under the general supervision of the Board of Directors under section 1304(b) of this title.

(Pub. L. 113–97, title I, §105, Apr. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 1121.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Cooperative and Small Employer Charity Pension Flexibility Act, and not as part of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to years beginning after Dec. 31, 2013, see section 3 of Pub. L. 113–97, set out as an Effective Date of 2014 Amendment note under section 401 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
§ 123.26 Transshipment of merchandise moving through Canada or Mexico. ( a ) *General.* Merchandise in transit proceeding under the provisions of this subpart may be transshipped from one conveyance to another in foreign territory. When transshipment requires the breaking of Customs seals, the breaking of the seals, transshipment and sealing of the conveyance or compartment to which the merchandise is transshipped shall be under the supervision of a Customs officer. He shall note his action on both the additional copy of the manifest presented to him, in accordance with § 123.25(b), and on the original copy, which shall be returned to the person in charge of the conveyance to accompany the merchandise. Merchandise transshipped in foreign territory without customs supervision when Customs seals were broken shall be treated upon return to the United States as imported merchandise.
( b ) *Storage awaiting transshipment.* Merchandise moving under in-transit manifests and Customs seals which is to be stored in foreign territory awaiting transshipment shall be checked into a storehouse by the Customs officer at the place of transshipment. It shall remain under Customs locks and seals until transshipment is completed under Customs supervision.
( c ) *Manifests where contents broken up.* When transshipment involves the breaking up of the in-transit contents of a conveyance or compartment, in such a manner as to require separate manifests for articles previously covered by a single manifest, the Customs officer supervising the transshipment shall take up the carrier's copy of the manifest and require the carrier to prepare a new manifest, in duplicate, for each conveyance to which the merchandise is transshipped. If there is to be further transshipment, an additional copy of each new manifest shall be presented by the carrier, and shall be returned to the person in charge of the carrier for delivery to the Customs officer at the point of further transshipment in accordance with § 123.25(b). After the transshipment and sealing of the conveyances and compartments has been supervised and the new manifests certified the originals of the new manifests shall be returned to the carrier to accompany the merchandise to the point of reentry into the United States.
§ 8365.1-3 Vehicles. ( a ) When operating a vehicle on the public lands, no person shall exceed posted speed limits, willfully endanger persons or property, or act in a reckless, careless or negligent manner.
( b ) ( 1 ) The operator of a motor vehicle is prohibited from operating a motor vehicle in motion, unless the operator and each front seat passenger is restrained by a properly fastened safety belt that conforms to applicable United States Department of Transportation standards, except that children, as defined by State law, shall be restrained as provided by State law.
( 2 ) Paragraph (b) applies on public lands, or portions thereof, that are located within a State in which there is no State law in effect that requires the mandatory use of a safety belt by the vehicle operator and any front seat passenger. It also applies on public lands, or portions thereof, located within a State in which the mandatory safety belt law of the State does not apply to the public lands or in which any provision of State law renders the mandatory safety belt law of the State unenforceable by the authorized officer as to acts or omissions occurring on the public lands.
( 3 ) This section does not apply to an operator or a passenger of a motor vehicle occupying a seat that was not originally equipped by the manufacturer with a safety belt, nor does it apply to an operator or passenger with a medical condition that prevents restraint by a safety belt or other occupant restraining device.
( 4 ) An authorized officer may not stop a motor vehicle for the sole purpose of determining whether a violation of paragraph (b)(1) of this section is being committed.
[48 FR 36384, Aug. 10, 1983, as amended at 57 FR 61243, Dec. 23, 1992]
EXHIBIT  32.1  SECTION  1350  CERTIFICATION  OF  THE  CHIEF  EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL  OFFICER

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002


Thomas  W.  Schneider, President and Chief Executive Officer, and James A. Dowd,
Senior  Vice  President  and Chief Financial Officer of Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.
(the  "Company"), each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that
he has reviewed the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended
December  31,  2006  and  that  to  the  best  of  his  knowledge:

1.   the report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the
     Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   the information  contained  in  the report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

The  purpose  of  this  statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section  1350  of  the  United  States  Code,  as  amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002.


March  30,  2007                 /s/  Thomas  W.  Schneider
                                 Thomas  W.  Schneider
                                 President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


March  30,  2007                 /s/  James  A.  Dowd
                                 James  A.  Dowd
                                 Senior  Vice  President  and
                                 Chief  Financial  Officer
Additional studies suggested by Wouter Achten:

Ou, X. M., X. C. Zhang, S. Y. Chang, and Q. F. Guo. 2009. Energy consumption and GHG emissions of 

six biofuel pathways by LCA in (the) People’s Republic of China. Applied Energy 86:S197–

S208.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.04.045

Title: Life cycle assessment of village electrification based on straight jatropha oil in Chhattisgarh, India

Author(s): Gmuender, Simon Michael; Zah, Rainer; Bhatacharjee, Somnath; et al.

Source: BIOMASS & BIOENERGY Volume: 34 Issue: 3 Pages: 347-355 DOI: 

10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.11.006 Published: MAR 2010

Title: Life cycle assessment for the production of biodiesel: A case study in Malaysia for palm oil versus 

jatropha oil

Author(s): Lam, Man Kee; Lee, Keat Teong; Mohamed, Abdul Rahman

Source: BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR Volume: 3 Issue: 6 Pages: 601-612 

 DOI: 10.1002/bbb.182 Published: NOV-DEC 2009

Title: Environmental Impacts of Jatropha curcas Biodiesel in India

Author(s): Gmuender, Simon; Singh, Reena; Pfister, Stephan; et al.

Source: JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICINE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Article Number: 623070 DOI: 

10.1155/2012/623070 Published: 2012

Romijn, H. A. 2011. Land clearing and greenhouse gas emissions from Jatropha biofuels on African 

miombo woodlands. Energy Policy 39:5751–5762

Title: Carbon impacts of direct land use change in semiarid woodlands converted to biofuel plantations in 

India and Brazil

Author(s): Bailis, Rob; McCarthy, Heather

Source: GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY Volume: 3 Issue: 6 Pages: 449-460 DOI: 

10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01100.x
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA - 2013 - 0688 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM221AD

HONEY WE LL TPE331 - 72 - 2190 --- 12/21/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-039

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, March 6, 1997)

NRC MEDIA WORKSHOP SCHEDULED

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is planning a two-day

workshop for news reporters April 23-24 at its headquarters in

Rockville, Maryland.

NRC senior managers and staff will brief extensively on

reactor operations, the allegation and investigation process, the

Office of the Inspector General, the problem plant "watch list,"

deregulation and retail wheeling, dry cask storage and spent

fuel, decommissioning, and other current issues. Reporters will

also tour the NRC Operations Center, which is the focal point for

communications during a nuclear facility emergency. Everything

will be on the record.

This workshop will be especially useful for reporters who

cover news events at nuclear facilities near their communities.

Those participating will receive background materials which may

be taken home for quick reference.

There is no charge for attending the workshop, but

participants must provide their own food, transportation and

lodging. A block of moderately priced rooms is being held at a

local hotel.

Because the size of the class is limited, those interested

in attending should contact the NRC Office of Public Affairs by

March 21 at (301) 415-8200, (e-mail: opa@nrc.gov) or write to

Office of Public Affairs, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, D.C., 20555.

#
Opinion issued December 2, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01
- 13
- 00 609
- CR

——————————— THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appella nt V. JEFF R E Y LYNN WAL T ER , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 56t h District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 12 CR3084

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, t he State of Texas, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). This motion has been
on file with the Court for more than ten da ys and no opinion has issued

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 10.3(a), 42.2(a).2 Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.2(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 47.2(b).
#### Marie C. Lowe v. Henry W. Lowe.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15





May 14, 2002



The Trustee
Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-70394) of the Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust for the
registration of 3,568,791 trust units of beneficial interest, of our report
dated May 14, 2002 relating to the unaudited condensed interim financial
statements of the Williams Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust that are included in its
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 15, 2002.

                                                 Very truly yours,



                                                 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
### §272. Legislative Counsel

The Legislative Counsel shall be appointed by the President pro tempore of the Senate, without reference to political affiliations and solely on the ground of fitness to perform the duties of the office.

(Feb. 24, 1919, ch. 18, title XIII, §1303(a), (d), 40 Stat. 1141; June 2, 1924, ch. 234, title XI, §1101, 43 Stat. 353; Sept. 20, 1941, ch. 412, title VI, §602, 55 Stat. 726.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Provisions authorizing appointment of a legislative counsel for the House of Representatives by the Speaker were omitted in view of nonapplicability of section to Speaker, employee, etc., of the House of Representatives pursuant to section 531 of Pub. L. 91–510, set out as a note under section 281 of this title. See section 282 of this title for provisions authorizing appointment, etc., of Legislative Counsel of the House of Representatives.

#### Amendments

1941—Act Sept. 20, 1941, substituted "President pro tempore of the Senate" for "President of the Senate."