alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1545-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-1545-DR), dated September 4, 2004, and related determinations. 

# Effective Date:

October 8, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective October 8, 2004.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs; 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security.

[FR Doc. 04-23733 Filed 10-21-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
#### § 144.21 Conditions for transfer.

Under the provisions of section 557(b) Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1557(b)), the right to withdraw all or part of merchandise entered for warehouse may be transferred by appropriate endorsement on the withdrawal form, provided that the transferee files a bond on Customs Form 301, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.62 of this chapter. Upon the deposit of the endorsed form, properly executed, and the transferee's bond with the Customs officer designated to receive such form and bond, the transferor and his sureties shall be relieved from all undischarged liability.

[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17464, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41185, Oct. 19, 1984; 49 FR 44867, Nov. 9, 1984]
§ 332.5 Public access to records and meetings. ( a ) Interested persons may, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552, inspect or copy any voluntary agreement, minutes of meetings, transcripts, records, or other data maintained pursuant to these rules.
( b ) Except as provided by paragraph (c) of this section, interested persons may attend any part of a meeting held to develop or carry out a voluntary agreement pursuant to these rules.
( c ) The sponsor of a voluntary agreement may withhold material described in this section from disclosure and restrict attendance at meetings only on the grounds specified in: ( 1 ) Section 552(b)(1) of 5 U.S.C., which applies to matter specifically required by Executive Order to be kept secret in the interest of the national defense or foreign policy. This section shall be interpreted to included matter protected under Executive Order 12065, dated June 28, 1978 (3 CFR 1979-1975 Comp. p. 678), establishing categories and criteria for classification; and
( 2 ) Section 552(b)(3) of 5 U.S.C., which applies to matter specifically exempted from disclosure by statute; and
( 3 ) Section 552(b)(4) of 5 U.S.C., which applies to trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person as privileged and confidential.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

No. III-00-40 July 14, 2000

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING JULY 18 IN MORRIS, ILLINOIS,

TO DESCRIBE LATEST ASSESSMENT OF LASALLE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting July 18 in Morris,

Illinois, to discuss the LaSalle Nuclear Power Plant’s latest performance review results. The plant is

located in Marseilles, Illinois, and operated by the Commonwealth Edison Company.

The meeting will be held at 8 a.m. CDT in the Mazon Joint Public Information Center, 960

North Illinois Route 47 in Morris.

The Plant Performance Reviews (PPRs) are an interim measure the NRC has used to assess

nuclear power plant safety while a reactor oversight process was being developed. The primary

purpose of the PPRs is to evaluate safety performance information and identify any changes in plant

performance so the NRC can allocate inspection resources appropriately. The text of each PPR letter,

including the one on LaSalle, is available from the NRC Office of Public Affairs and is posted at:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr on the NRC web site.

Current performance information for the plants is available at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html on the NRC web site.

A plain language summary of the new reactor oversight process is available from the Office of

Public Affairs or at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm on the NRC web site.

# #
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 27, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00529

- CR

Jenelius O. CREW

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR12785

Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On December 20 , 2022, appellant filed his Third Motion for Extension of Time to File

Brief. On that same day, appellant filed the brief

. We GRANT the motion and DEEM the brief

timely filed

.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of December, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Independent Accountants' Consent**

The Board of DirectorsWarwick Community Bancorp, Inc:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No. 333-40773, No.333-81467 and No. 333-103136 on Form S-8, of our report dated February 27, 2004, except forthe paragraph in note 7, which is as of March 11, 2004, related to the consolidated statement offinancial condition of Warwick Community Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity, andcash flows for each of the years in the two-year period, which is included in the December 31, 2003Annual Report on Form 10-K of Warwick Community Bancorp, Inc.

The 2001 consolidated financial statements of Warwick Community Bancorp, Inc. andsubsidiaries were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations.  Those auditorsexpressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements in their report dated January 29,2002.

/s/ KPMG LLP
Short Hills, New JerseyMarch 11, 2004
<Page>

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Public
Accountants" incorporated by reference into this Post-Effective Amendment
No. 6 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-43799) of Fortis
Benefits Insurance Company and to the incorporation by reference therein of
our report dated February 17, 2000, with respect to the financial statements
of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company included in the Prospectus and Statement of
Additional Information of Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Registration
Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-43799) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Minneapolis, Minnesota                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
December 27, 2002
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 10.55

TO:      Jay Grossman

FR:      Perry A. Sook

RE:      Modifications to My Compensation Agreement

DA:      9/26/02

To remain in compliance with the new Sarbanes-Oxley regulations, set forth in
this memorandum are the modifications to my compensation agreement as we have
discussed.

Salary and Bonus:  (in $  000's)
Current Agreement                  Modification as Agreed
            Salary      Bonus      Salary               Bonus
2002        400         200        600 (eff. 10/1/02)   300
2003        415         207.5      615                  307.5
2004        430         215        630                  315
2005        450         225        650                  325
2006        475         237.5      675                  337.5
2007        500         250        700                  350

Completion/Change of Control Incentive:
The current agreement calls for a payment of $4,000,000 at the end of contract
completion, at 12/31/07 or upon change of control. The modification as agreed
reduces that payment to $2,300,000 in exchange for the current compensation
changes made above.

Early Sale Incentive:
Furthermore, an incentive for an early sale of the company has been instituted.
Payments will be made on the following schedule:

                  Prior to 12/31/05         $900,000
                  During 2006               $500,000
                  During 2007               $150,000

All other aspects of my employment relationship with Nexstar Broadcasting remain
the same. Please evidence your agreement and approval of the terms and
conditions contained herein by signing below.

Sincerely,                                           Agreed and Accepted:


/s/ Perry A. Sook
---------------------------
Perry A. Sook                                        /s/ Jay Grossman
                                                     ---------------------------
President/CEO                                        Date:


                        NEXSTAR BROADCASTING GROUP, INC.
         200 Abington Executive Park, Suite 201 Clarks Summit, PA 19411
                       (570) 586-5400 fax (570) 586-8745
###### Editorial Note on Part 141

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 141.88 Computed value.

When the Center director determines that information as to computed value is necessary in the appraisement of any class or kind of merchandise, he shall so notify the importer, and thereafter invoices of such merchandise shall contain a verified statement by the manufacturer or producer of computed value as defined in § 402(e), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 1401a(e)).

[T.D. 87-89, 52 FR 24445, July 1, 1987]
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 2082** 

NATHANIEL HAMPTON , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. PAULA EDGERTON; ROBINA SCHENCK; CYNTHIA WILLIAMS; WILLIE COLEMAN, Housing Authority of Florence , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. J. Michelle Childs , District Judge. ( 4:14

- cv - 04697

- JMC )

Submitted : January 28, 2016 Decided: April 22, 2016

Before GREGORY and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Nathaniel Hampton, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Kirk Battle, BATTLE LAW FIRM, LLC, Conway, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Nathaniel Hampton appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants
. Hampton v. Edgerton , No. 4:1 4

- c v - 0 4697

- JMC ( D.S.C. Sept
. 9 , 2 015) . On appeal, Hampton argues that the district court erred in its conclusion regarding his claims for : (1) interference with his freedom of association ; (2) retaliation ; (3) civil conspiracy; (4) a due process violation , and ; (5) intentional infliction of emotional distress
. Regarding Hampton’s First Amendment claim, assuming, without deciding, that Hampton had a fundamental right to associate with his girlfriend, his right was not infringed upon in this instance
. Where government action implicates a f undamental right, it will be subject to strict scrutiny only where the action “interferes directly and substantially with the fundamental right.” Waters v. Gaston Cty. , 57 F.3d 422, 426 (4th Cir. 1995). Where government action has only an incidental effect on a fundamental right, rational basis review applies
. Id. The governmental policy at issue here did not prohibit cohabitation with a nonmarital partner or forbid it altogether without permission of the government. The governmental action constituted “[a]t most, an unwelcome hurdle” to Hampton’s3 association with his girlfriend and is therefore subject to rational basis review. Id. Under that standard, the policy need only be rationally related to a legitimate gover nmental interest. Wilkins v. Gaddy , 734 F.3d 344, 348

- 49 (4th Cir. 2013). We conclude that the government policy is permissible under this standard of review. We have r eviewed the record and find no merit to Hampton’s remaining contentions . Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis , we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case 9:20-mj-08216-BER Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 1 of 10
Case 9:20-mj-08216-BER Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 2 of 10
Case 9:20-mj-08216-BER Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 3 of 10
Case 9:20-mj-08216-BER Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 4 of 10
Case 9:20-mj-08216-BER Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 5 of 10
Case 9:20-mj-08216-BER Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 6 of 10
Case 9:20-mj-08216-BER Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 7 of 10
Case 9:20-mj-08216-BER Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 8 of 10
Case 9:20-mj-08216-BER Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 9 of 10
Case 9:20-mj-08216-BER Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2020 Page 10 of 10
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-96-71 October 28, 1996

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

PARTS OF LOCAL PUBLIC DOCUMENT ROOM FOR THREE MILE ISLAND

AND PEACH BOTTOM NUCLEAR PLANTS ARE REOPENED

Some portions of the Harrisburg branch of the Pennsylvania State library housing the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission's local public document room for the Three Mile Island and Peach Bottom

nuclear power plants have been reopened to the public. A project to remove lead from the

building led to the temporary closure. The work began last fall.

The opened areas include the basement level section where NRC microfiche of most of the

plant records issued since January 1981 can be found. The stack area containing hard copy NRC

records will remain closed for about six more months.

During the remainder of the lead removal project, every effort will be made to meet the

informational needs of document room patrons. For example, library staff will continue to perform

on-line searches of the agency's NUDOCS database.

The locations of other NRC document rooms that maintain records on Three Mile Island and

Peach Bottom, which are operated by GPU Energy Corporation and Philadelphia Electric

Company, respectively, can be obtained by contacting the agency's LPDR staff, at (800) 638-

8081. Requests for records also may be addressed to the NRC's Public Document Room, 2120 L

Street NW, Lower Level, Washington, D.C., 20555-0001, or by calling the room at (800) 397-

4209.

Individuals interested in using the Harrisburg NRC document room collection while the stack

areas are closed are asked to contact the State Library of Pennsylvania at (717) 787-2327 or

NRC LPDR staff members at their toll-free number listed above.

#
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50824 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARTIN BENITO FRIAS-SALAZAR, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-03-CR-104-1

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Martin Benito Frias-Salazar appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Frias-Salazar contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Frias-Salazar maintains that heNo. 03-50824 -2- pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Frias-Salazar acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
#### § 402.5 Forwarding commodities previously shipped.

Order T-1 applies to transportation on or discharge from ships documented under the laws of the United States and aircraft registered under the laws of the United States. These restrictions apply either in the case of a discharge at one of the restricted ports or to discharge at any other port in transit to a restricted destination. The restrictions of Order T-1 do not apply to transportation by foreign carriers, as long as there is no prohibited transportation or discharge by or from a United States flag ship or aircraft after the issuance of Order T-1. Accordingly, if an American flag ship or aircraft, before the issuance of Order T-1, had transported restricted commodities manifested to restricted destinations, and had completed the transportation to a foreign intermediate point and had completed the discharge from the American flag ship or aircraft before the issuance of Order T-1, no violation of that order would have occurred, but Order T-1 would prohibit further shipment on an American flag ship or aircraft unless authorization under Order T-1 is obtained.
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1344

For the relief of Pamela S. Konkel. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2003

Mr. SHIMKUS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Pamela S. Konkel.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ENTITLEMENT TO WIDOW’S INSURANCE BENE4 FITS. 

5 (a) ELIGIBILITY TO RECEIVE WIDOW’S INSURANCE

6 BENEFITS.—For purposes of determining the entitlement 

7 of Pamela S. Konkel (social security number 000–00–

8 5889) of Troy, Illinois, to widow’s insurance benefits 

9 under section 202(e) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

10 402(e)) on the basis of the wages and employment of her 

11 husband, Robert Konkel (social security number 000–00–
2

•HR 1344 IH 

1 9184), Pamela S. Konkel shall be deemed, effective as of 

2 October 31, 2002—

3 (1) to be a widow within the meaning of section 

4 216(c)(5) of such Act, and 

5 (2) to have attained the age of 60, in satisfac6 tion of section 202(e)(1)(B)(i) of such Act. 

7 (b) PAYMENT OF BENEFITS.—Any widow’s insurance 

8 benefits to which Pamela S. Konkel is entitled for the pe9 riod prior to the date of enactment of this Act shall be 

10 paid to her in a lump sum.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 200 (Monday, October 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23406]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Thursday, October 21, 2004.

Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Quarterly Insurance Fund Report.
    2. Final Rule: Section 701.14 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, 
Change in Official or Senior Executive Officer in Credit Unions that 
are Newly Chartered or in Troubled Condition.
    3. Final Rule: Part 723 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Member 
Business Loans.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: (703) 518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-23406 Filed 10-14-04; 3:18 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M