alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SIGHT
RESOURCE CORPORATION'S BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,252
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,875
<ALLOWANCES>                                       381
<INVENTORY>                                      2,395
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,849
<PP&E>                                           6,470
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,414)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,654
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,356
<SALES>                                         10,440
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,440
<CGS>                                            3,849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (22)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (387)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (387)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (387)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. III-01-008 February 28, 2001

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF COMPLETES SAFETY REVIEW OF DESIGN ISSUE

AT PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR POWER STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has determined a recently identified design problem

to be of “low to moderate safety significance” at the Prairie Island Nuclear Power Station near Red

Wing, Minnesota. The two-reactor facility is operated by Nuclear Management Company.

An NRC inspection in October and November found that certain components in the cooling

water system for plant equipment might not function under external conditions affecting the plant, like

an earthquake or a loss of electrical power. The components in question lubricate and cool bearings in

three pumps in the system.

The pumps provide cooling water to equipment that is needed for the safe operation and

shutdown of the plant. The design problems would not affect normal operation of the equipment.

The inspection determined that the electrical power supply and the water source for the specific

components did not meet the requirements for safety-related equipment to assure they will operate

under adverse and abnormal conditions.

The NRC’s review classified the design problems as a “white” finding, meaning they were of

“low to moderate safety significance.” The NRC uses a four-category rating system for its inspection

findings; from green, through white and yellow, to red, depicting increasing safety significance.

A “white” finding requires the company to take necessary corrective actions and leads to

additional NRC inspection oversight in the area of the finding. The utility subsequently corrected the

cooling water system deficiencies.

The NRC staff also issued a Notice of Violation to the company. No fine was proposed.

Details of the inspection findings are available on the NRC web site at:

<http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/REPORTS/prai_2000013.pdf>.

Additional information on the NRC's reactor inspection and assessment program is on the web

site at: <http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/index.html>.

###
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-98-40 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Wednesday, May 27, 1998)

NRC STAFF ISSUES REPORT ON PERFORMANCE

AT BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Performance Is Superior In Three Areas And Good In Fourth

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued a Systematic Assessment of

Licensee Performance (SALP) report for the Browns Ferry nuclear power plant near

Athens, Alabama, which indicates continued high performance in the areas assessed.

Browns Ferry is owned and operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority.

The NRC report assessed performance at Browns Ferry for a period from September 8,

1996 through April 18, 1998 in the functional areas of Plant Operations, Engineering,

Maintenance and Plant Support.

Performance in the areas of Plant Operations and Plant Support remained in Category

1 (superior), as they were during the previous period of assessment. Maintenance

improved from Category 2 (good) to Category 1. Engineering retained its previous

assessment of Category 2.

NRC officials will discuss details of the evaluation with TVA management at a public

meeting to be held at the plant site at noon on June 11. Members of the public are

welcome to attend for purposes of observation, and NRC officials will be available at its

conclusion to answer questions from interested observers.

#
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 24, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 24, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24I0246. MAGGIE MOULTON v. WILLIAM GOODELL.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2023CV386134
§ 172.2 Petition for relief. ( a ) *To whom addressed.* Petitions for the cancellation of any claim for liquidated damages or remission or mitigation of a fine or penalty secured by a Customs bond incurred under any law or regulation administered by Customs must be addressed to the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer designated in the notice of claim.
( b ) *Signature.* The petition for remission or mitigation must be signed by the petitioner, his attorney-at-law or a Customs broker. If the petitioner is a corporation, the petition may be signed by an officer or responsible supervisory official of the corporation, or responsible employee representative of the corporation. Electronic signatures are acceptable. The deciding Customs officer may, in his or her discretion and with articulable cause, require proof of representation before consideration of any petition.
( c ) *Form.* The petition for cancellation, remission or mitigation need not be in any particular form. Customs can require that the petition and any documents submitted in support of the petition be in English or be accompanied by an English translation. The petition must set forth the following: ( 1 ) The date and place of the violation; and
( 2 ) The facts and circumstances relied upon by the petitioner to justify cancellation, remission or mitigation.
( d ) *False statement in petition.* A false statement contained in a petition may subject the petitioner to prosecution under the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 1001.
Exhibit 21.1
                                                                    ------------

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



WARWICK COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC. - owns 100% of the capital stock of The Warwick
Savings Bank and of Hardenburgh Abstract Company of Orange County, Inc. and
99.75% of the capital stock of The Towne Center Bank.

THE WARWICK SAVINGS BANK - owns 100% of the following subsidiary corporations:

         1.       WSB Financial Services, Inc. (New York)
         2.       Warsave Development Corp. (New York)
         3.       The Towne Center Mortgage Company, Inc. (New Jersey)

and 100% of the outstanding common stock, and 86.96% of the outstanding
preferred stock, of WSB Funding Corp. (Delaware).
#### Abraham Velleman, Respondent, v. Sidney Blumenthal & Company, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 14

- 00376

- CV

IN RE KAREN G. BAUNC HAND

Original Proceeding

ORDER

Real party in interest, the Honorable Joe F. Grubbs, has filed in this mandamus

proceeding a “Motion for Leave to Set Attached Motion to Defer Sanctions Portion of

Order for Hearing in the District Court.” At this time, the Court will not rule on the real

party in interest’s motion but instead, issues the following Order.

The stay issued in this proceeding on December 18, 2014 is lifted in part , as

explained below, with regard to any matter in trial court case number 87,767D. The Court

expressly authorizes the trial court to rule on any and all motions, whether currently

pending or subsequently filed, and to reconsider any prior ruling of the t rial court over

which it retains jurisdiction; including whether, sanctions, if any, are appropriate andIn re Baunchand Page 2

whether records, if any, should be sealed. However, the trial court may not treat any

sanctions as having been violated or not complied with by the re lator, Karen G.

Baunchand, until further order of this Court.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Stay lifted in part

Order issued and filed March 26, 2015
```

[110th Congress Public Law 215]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ215.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 728]]

Public Law 110-215
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  116 Helen Highway in Cleveland, Georgia, as the ``Sgt. Jason Harkins 
      Post Office <<NOTE: May 7, 2008 -  [H.R. 3936]>> Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SGT. JASON HARKINS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 116 Helen Highway in Cleveland, Georgia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sgt. Jason Harkins Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sgt. Jason 
Harkins Post Office Building''.

    Approved May 7, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3936:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            Feb. 28, considered and passed House.
            Apr. 22, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.3031 Corrected claim or certification by importers.

An importer who makes a corrected claim under § 10.3003(c) will not be subject to civil or administrative penalties under 19 U.S.C. 1592 for having made an incorrect claim or having submitted an incorrect certification, provided that the corrected claim is promptly and voluntarily made.
|  |
|--|

|  |  |
|--|--|

| ** ** |
|------------|

|   | ****Project Blue Book**** 
12 pages

This small file relates to an Air Force program for the investigation of Unidentified Flying Objects. The Secretary of the Air Force discontinued this program in 1969.

**Part 01**

Introduction
Reading Room Index - A   B   C   D   E    F   G- H   I    J    K   L   M   N   -O   P   Q   R   S   T   U-V   W   X   Y   Z   
Electronic Reading Room
- Alphabetical Listing- Espionage-Famous Persons-Gangster Era- Historical Interest- Unusual Phenomena-Violent CrimeFBI              File Fact Sheet FOIA Request Instructions- FOIA Request Form - Privacy Waiver and Certificate of Identity Form Privacy Act Instructions- Privacy Act Request FormDOJ              Reference GuideU.S.              DOJ FOIASearch
All of these publications are in PDF (Portable Document Format). To view them you will need to have the Adobe Acrobat Reader plug-in installed on your computer. The Reader can be downloaded at no cost from Adobe's site on the World Wide Web.   If you have difficulty accessing any material on this site because of a disability, please contact us in writing or via telephone and we will work with you to make the information available.

Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Section    202-324-5520 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
; Generated by FastSum - an extremely fast checksum utility.
; Go to www.fastsum.com to get your own copy for free.
;
FD7E5B811C0C225DF2F35CB4A14E5128 *ORD-EDR-Feb1998.pdf
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 4.2  


 
 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT    
  


        This First Amendment to Rights Agreement is entered into as of December 17, 2002, between Anacomp, Inc., an Indiana corporation (the
"Company"), and Mellon Investor Services LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company, as Rights Agent (the "Rights
Agent"), with respect to the Rights Agreement dated as of August 8, 2002 (the "Rights Agreement"). Capitalized terms used
in this document and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed in the Rights Agreement. 



        WHEREAS,
the Company believes that it is appropriate to amend the provisions of the Rights Agreement to revise the definition of "Grandfathered Person" to reflect the intent of the
Company at the time of adoption of the Rights Agreement; and 


        WHEREAS,
pursuant to the terms of the Rights Agreement, the Company may in its sole and absolute discretion, and the Rights Agent shall if the Company so directs, amend certain
provisions of the Rights Agreement (such as the definition desired to be revised) without the approval of any holders of the Rights. 



        NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements herein set forth, and as provided in the Rights Agreement, the parties agree as follows: 



        1.    Amendment to Definition of "Grandfathered Person."    Section 1(r) of the Rights Agreement is amended in
its entirety to read as follows: "Grandfathered Person" shall mean each of Franklin Advisors and Special Value Investment Management, LLC
(together with Affiliates of Special Value Investment Management, LLC), provided that each of such Persons shall cease to be a Grandfathered Person at such time as each such Person ceases to
Beneficially Own in excess of 20% of the Company's Common Stock." 



        2.    No Other Changes.    This Amendment shall not affect any other terms or provisions of the Rights Agreement, all
of which other provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 




        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to Rights Agreement to be duly executed, all as of the date and year first set forth above. 



	ATTEST:	 	ANACOMP, INC.
	

By:	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

 	
 	

 
	 	 	
	 	 	 	

	 	 	Name:	 	Paul J. Najar	 	 	 	Name:	 	Jeffrey R. Cramer
	 	 	Title:	 	Executive Vice President

General Counsel & Secretary	 	 	 	Title:	 	President
	

ATTEST:	
 	

MELLON INVESTOR SERVICES LLC
	

By:	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

 	
 	

 
	 	 	
	 	 	 	

	 	 	Name:	 	 	 	 	 	Name:	 	 
	 	 	Title:	 	 	 	 	 	Title:	 	 











QuickLinks


FIRST AMENDMENT TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-039 June 20, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH EXELON GENERATION COMPANY 

TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE AT LIMERICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Exelon Generation

Company on Tuesday evening, June 26, to discuss the results of the agencyís annual assessment of

safety performance at the Limerick nuclear power plant.

The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m.

at the Limerick Energy Information Center, 298 Longview Road, in Linfield, Pa. NRC officials will be

available afterwards to answer questions.

The performance period to be discussed is April 1, 2000, to March 31, 2001. Overall, the NRC

found that the plant operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and fully met all

cornerstone objectives during the period. A letter sent from the NRC Region I office to Exelon

addresses plant performance during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It

is available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/lim_2001q1.pdf

Current performance information for the Limerick plant is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LIM1/lim1_chart.html

###
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-61656-CIV-SMITH

SOUTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT,

Plaintiff,

v.

BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA, INC.

and HEALTH OPTIONS, INC.,

Defendants.

________________________________________________/

ORDER OF TRANSFER

GOOD CAUSE appearing that a transfer of this case is appropriate under Internal 

Operating Procedure 2.15.00 of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 

because of related Case Number 20-cv-61655-AHS, and subject to the consent of the Honorable 

Raag Singhal, it is 

ORDERED that the above numbered case is transferred to the calendar of Judge Singhal

for all further proceedings. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 4th day of September 2020.

Case 0:20-cv-61656-AHS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2020 Page 1 of 2
After reviewing the file in the above-numbered case, the undersigned hereby accepts the 

transfer of this case. Therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED that all pleadings filed after this date shall bear the following case number, 

20-CIV-61656-AHS, thereby indicating the Judge to whom all pleadings should be routed.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 8th day of

September 2020.

RAAG SINGHAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to counsel of record via CM/ECF

Case 0:20-cv-61656-AHS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2020 Page 2 of 2
### §6320. Purchase of office equipment or furnishings by Senators

#### (a) Authorization; conditions

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a United States Senator may purchase, upon leaving office or otherwise ceasing to be a Senator (except by expulsion), any item or items of office equipment or office furnishings provided by the General Services Administration and then currently located and in use in an office of such Senator in the State then represented by such Senator.

#### (b) Request by Senator and arrangement for purchase by Sergeant at Arms of Senate; regulations governing purchase; price

At the request of any United States Senator, the Sergeant at Arms of the Senate shall arrange for and make the purchase of equipment and furnishings under subsection (a) of this section on behalf of such Senator. Each such purchase shall be—

(1) in accordance with regulations which shall be prescribed by the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate, after consultation with the General Services Administration; and

(2) at a price equal to the acquisition cost to the Federal Government of the equipment or furnishings so purchased, less allowance for depreciation determined under such regulations, but in no instance less than the fair market value of such items.

#### (c) Remittance of amounts received to General Services Administration; disposition

Amounts received by the Federal Government from the sale of items of office equipment or office furnishings under this section shall be remitted to the General Services Administration and credited to the appropriate account or accounts.

(Pub. L. 93–462, §2, Oct. 20, 1974, 88 Stat. 1388.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 59b of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.