alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 361.6 Documentation of matching contributions. ( a ) The statement of work provided by the State to FEMA describing the specific activities comprising its earthquake hazards reduction project, including the project budget, shall reflect a level of effort commensurate with the total of the State and FEMA contributions.
( b ) The basis by which the State determines the value of an in-kind match must be documented and a copy retained as part of the official record.
( c ) The State shall maintain all records pertaining to matching contributions for a three-year period after the date of submission of the final financial report required by the CCA, or date of audit, whichever date comes first.
§ 144.11 Form of entry. ( a ) *Entry.* The documentation required by § 142.3 of this chapter shall be filed at the time of entry. If the entry summary, Customs Form 7501, or its electronic equivalent is filed at the time of entry for merchandise to be entered for warehouse, it shall serve as both the entry and the entry summary, and Customs Form 3461 or 7533, or their electronic equivalents, shall not be required. If the entry summary is not filed at the time of entry, it shall be filed within the time limit prescribed by § 142.12 of this chapter. If merchandise is released before the filing of the entry summary, the importer shall have a bond on file, as prescribed by § 142.4 of this chapter.
( b ) *Customs Form 7501, or its electronic equivalent.* The entry summary for merchandise entered for warehouse shall be executed in triplicate on Customs Form 7501, or its electronic equivalent appropriately modified, and shall include all of the statistical information required by § 141.61(e) of this chapter. The port director may require an extra copy or copies of Customs Form 7501, annotated “PERMIT” for use in connection with delivery of the merchandise to the bonded warehouse.
( c ) *Designation of warehouse.* The importer shall designate on the entry summary, Customs Form 7501, or its electronic equivalent the bonded warehouse in which he desires his merchandise deposited.
( d ) *Specification list.* When packages which are not uniform in contents, quantities, values, or rates of duties are grouped together as one item on an entry summary, a specification list (original only) shall be furnished with the entry summary, showing separately opposite the marks or numbers of each package, the quantity of each class of merchandise, the entered value of each class, and the rates of duty claimed for each. However, a specification list is not needed if one withdrawal is to be filed for all the merchandise covered by the entry summary.
[T.D. 79-221, 44 FR 46828, Aug. 9, 1979, as amended by T.D. 84-129, 49 FR 23168, June 5, 1984; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61290, Oct. 13, 2015]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002, of Synagro Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ross M. Patten, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company and that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


                                             /s/ Ross M. Patten
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Ross M. Patten
                                             November 14, 2002
No. 12,876.

#### In re Adjudication of Priority Rights to the Use of Water. San Luis Valley Irrigation District et al. *v.*Jemison.

(21 P. [2d] 179)

Decided April 10, 1933.

Mr. George M. Corlett, Mr. Claude W. Corlett, Mr. P. B. Goudy, Mr. Edward L. Wood, for plaintiffs in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

*413Me. Justice Campbell

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a companion case to cause No. 12,873 by the same plaintiffs in error against W. F. Knowlton, defendant in error, 92 Colo. 407, 21 P. (2d) 177. The respective parties themselves are in accord that the questions of fact and the questions of law are the same in both cases, and the same as. in another case pending in this court between the same plaintiffs in error and Fr'ed Fuchs in cause No. 12,877.

The judgment herein therefore will he, and it is, affirmed in its entirety for the reasons set forth in our opinion in the Knowlton case.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin E.
Franklin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

        (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Martin E. Franklin
----------------------

Martin E. Franklin
Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2003

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ian G.H. Ashken,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

        (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Ian G.H. Ashken
-------------------

Ian G.H. Ashken
Chief Financial Officer
November  13, 2003
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.736 Accessories, spare parts, or tools. ( a ) *General.* Accessories, spare parts, or tools that are delivered with a good and that form part of the good's standard accessories, spare parts, or tools will be treated as originating goods if the good is an originating good, and will be disregarded in determining whether all the non-originating materials used in the production of the good undergo an applicable change in tariff classification specified in General Note 28(n), HTSUS, provided that: ( 1 ) The accessories, spare parts, or tools are not invoiced separately from the good; and
( 2 ) The quantities and value of the accessories, spare parts, or tools are customary for the good.
( b ) *Regional value content.* If the good is subject to a regional value content requirement, the value of the accessories, spare parts, or tools is taken into account as originating or non-originating materials, as the case may be, in calculating the regional value content of the good under § 10.734 of this subpart.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-020 April 20, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ON UNPLANNED POWER CHANGES

AT JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with management of the James A. FitzPatrick

nuclear power plant on Friday, April 27, to discuss the facility’s performance, specifically with regard

to progress on and plans for addressing the number of unplanned power changes experienced during

recent assessment periods. The plant is owned and operated by Entergy Nuclear Northeast.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. in the auditorium of the plant’s Training Center, on

Lake Road in Scriba, N.Y. It will be open to the public.

Under the NRC Reactor Oversight Process launched in April 2000, the agency uses several tools

to assess plant performance. Among those tools are performance indicators, which utilize different

colors to depict increasing safety significance. The colors range from green, which means

performance within an expected range, rising to white, which is considered performance outside the

expected range, to yellow and finally red. For instance, if a plant has six or more unplanned power

changes during a specified period, it receives a "white" indicator.

In the case of the FitzPatrick plant, it has received a "white" indicator in the area of unplanned

power changes during recent assessment periods, indicating to the NRC that there are continued

problems with equipment reliability that have impacted plant operations. These problems extend back

several years. As a result of the "white" indicator, the NRC staff has requested a meeting with plant

management to review performance in this area.

Further information on the plant’s performance indicators and inspection findings is available on

the NRC’s web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS

#
### §88b–5. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 88b–5 was editorially reclassified as section 4917 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



We, Samuel A. Kovnat, Chief Executive Officer, and David D. Cryer, Chief Financial Officer, of Flight Safety Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)     The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|September 10, 2007 | By: | /s/ Samuel A. Kovnat                        
|------------------ | --- | --------------------------------------------
|                   |     |                                             
|                   |     | Samuel A. Kovnat
Its Chief Executive Officer



|September 10, 2007 | By: | /s/ David D. Cryer                        
|------------------ | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                   |     |                                           
|                   |     | David D. Cryer
Its Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6446
TERRY L. JACKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus E. MONTGOMERY TUCKER, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-728-3) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry L. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Terry L. Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewedthe record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jackson v. Tucker , No. CA-97-728-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 5, 1998). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 








Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






(i)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.


Dated: November 8, 2007
    
    
    
    /s / Jeffrey L. Karafa

Jeffrey L. KarafaTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer,Dearborn Bancorp, Inc.


46
#### § 175.1 Submission of request.

Written requests pursuant to section 516, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1516), for information as to the classification, appraised value and rate of duty imposed upon designated imported merchandise shall be submitted in triplicate to the Commissioner of Customs.

[T.D. 70-181, 35 FR 13432, Aug. 22, 1970, as amended by T.D. 80-271, 45 FR 75642, Nov. 17, 1980]
#### Guaranty Trust Company of New York, Appellant, v. Wilpark Realty Corp., et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and (.Callahan, JJ.
#### § 75.12 Application by a State for exemption.

Application for exemption made pursuant to this part shall be made by the Governor or other duly authorized official of the State accompanied by sufficient supporting documentation which certifies that the plan of self-insurance upon which the application for exemption is based meets or exceeds the standards set forth in § 75.11.
|  |
|--|

|  |  |
|--|--|

| ** ** |
|------------|

|   | ****Hell's Angels**** 
233 pages

General information from the 1960s and 70s about this motorcycle gang's involvement in violent activities in various parts of the country.

**Part 1a****Part 1b****Part 1c****Part 2a****Part 2b****Part 2c**

Introduction
Reading Room Index - A   B   C   D   E    F   G- H   I    J    K   L   M   N   -O   P   Q   R   S   T   U-V   W   X   Y   Z   
Electronic Reading Room
- Alphabetical Listing- Espionage-Famous Persons-Gangster Era- Historical Interest- Unusual Phenomena-Violent CrimeFBI              File Fact Sheet FOIA Request Instructions- FOIA Request Form - Privacy Waiver and Certificate of Identity Form Privacy Act Instructions- Privacy Act Request FormDOJ              Reference GuideU.S.              DOJ FOIASearch
All of these publications are in PDF (Portable Document Format). To view them you will need to have the Adobe Acrobat Reader plug-in installed on your computer. The Reader can be downloaded at no cost from Adobe's site on the World Wide Web.   If you have difficulty accessing any material on this site because of a disability, please contact us in writing or via telephone and we will work with you to make the information available.

Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Section    202-324-5520 |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-98 August 4, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC STAFF BARS PRESIDENT OF NEW JERSEY MEDICAL FIRM, CONSULTANT

FROM PARTICIPATING IN ACTIVITIES LICENSED BY AGENCY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued orders,

effective immediately, to Magdy Elamir, M.D., and Aharon BenHaim, Ph.D., barring them from involvement in NRC-licensed

activities for providing false information to the agency.

Dr. Elamir is the president and owner of Newark Medical

Associates, which holds an NRC license authorizing the possession

and use of any NRC-licensed radiopharmaceutical for imaging and

localization procedures. Ben-Haim is his consultant.

NRC also has directed Newark Medical Associates to tell the

agency why its license should not be suspended or revoked.

An NRC inspection in January found that the individuals

acting as the authorized user of radioactive materials at Newark

Medical Associates and as its radiation safety officer were not

listed on the license, as NRC requires. A subsequent

investigation by the NRC’s Office of Investigations determined

that the application for the license listed an individual as the

sole authorized user and radiation safety officer without that

individual’s consent or knowledge. Investigators further found

that the individual has never been associated with Newark Medical

Associates.

This inaccurate information provided in the February 22,

1996, application formed, in part, the basis for the issuance of

the license. The NRC has determined that the violation was

deliberate on the part of both Dr. Elamir and Ben-Haim.

Activities prohibited by the order include, but are not

limited to, supervision of licensed activities, such as hiring,

directing or managing individuals engaged in those activities.

Dr. Elamir and Ben-Haim and any other person adversely affected

by this order have 20 days to request a hearing.
In addition, the NRC staff has issued a demand for

information to Newark Medical Associates to explain why its NRC

license should not be suspended or revoked. Failure to respond

to the demand for information within the prescribed 20 days may

result in further enforcement action.

Newark Medical Associates currently is authorized to

continue operations under its NRC license under the direction of

a new individual who has since been approved as the authorized

user and radiation safety officer, so long as Dr. Elamir and BenHaim are not involved.

#
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2


                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                             TO THE CHOICEPOINT INC.
                           DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN



         THIS AMENDMENT to the ChoicePoint Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the
"Plan") is made and entered into by ChoicePoint Inc. (the Company") as of the
31st day of January, 2001;

         WHEREAS, the Company has previously adopted the Plan, which was
originally effective July 30, 1997; and

         WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 12.5 of the Plan, the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company did, by resolution adopted
January 31, 2001, approve the amendment of the Plan in certain particulars, and
Section 12.5 permits amendment of the Plan in the Plan Administrator's
discretion consistent with the overall compensation and benefit policies of the
Company;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

                                       1.

         Section 7.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following
sentence at the end of said section:

                  "For contributions to Excess Profit-Sharing Contributions
         Accounts made for the Plan Year 2002 and thereafter (but not for such
         Accounts consisting of contributions made for Plan Years ending in or
         prior to 2001), the earnings credited will be based upon the investment
         experience of the Choice Point Inc. Stock Fund."



<PAGE>


                                       2.

         Section 9.1(b) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the next to
the last word ("cash") from the final sentence in said subsection.

                                       3.

         Section 9.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following
subsection (d) thereto:

                  "(d) Nature of Payment. Distributions of Excess Matching
         Contribution Accounts, Excess Transition Benefit Plan Accounts, Excess
         Profit-Sharing Contributions Accounts (for post-2001 Plan Years) and
         SERP Accounts shall be made in Company Stock, and distributions of all
         other Accounts shall be made in cash."


                                       4.

         The remaining provisions of the Plan are hereby ratified and confirmed.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be
executed as of the date and year first above written.

                                                   CHOICEPOINT INC.


                                                   By:  /s/ JOHN KARR
                                                      --------------------------
                                                   Title:  Vice President

Attest:

/s/ MARY J. RUPERT
----------------------------------------------
Title:   Notary Public, Fulton County, Georgia
         My Commission Expires Jan. 20, 2002


                                       2
#### § 133.26 Demand for redelivery of released merchandise.

If it is determined that merchandise which has been released from CBP custody is subject to the restrictions of § 133.21, § 133.22 or § 133.23 of this subpart, an authorized CBP official shall promptly make demand for the redelivery of the merchandise under the terms of the bond on CBP Form 301, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.62 of this chapter, in accordance with § 141.113 of this chapter. If the merchandise is not redelivered to CBP custody, a claim for liquidated damages shall be made in accordance with § 141.113(h) of this chapter.

[T.D. 72-266, 37 FR 20678, Oct. 3, 1972, as amended by T.D. 99-64, 64 FR 43266, Aug. 10, 1999; CBP Dec. 12-10, 77 FR 24380, Apr. 24, 2012; CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93018, Dec. 20, 2016]