alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.813 Value of materials. ( a ) *General.* For purposes of § 10.810(b) of this subpart and, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the value of a material produced in the territory of one or both of the Parties includes the following: ( 1 ) The price actually paid or payable for the material by the producer of the good;
( 2 ) The freight, insurance, packing and all other costs incurred in transporting the material to the producer's plant, if such costs are not included in the price referred to in paragraph (a)(1) of this section;
( 3 ) The cost of waste or spoilage resulting from the use of the material in the growth, production, or manufacture of the good, less the value of recoverable scrap; and
( 4 ) Taxes or customs duties imposed on the material by one or both of the Parties, if the taxes or customs duties are not remitted upon exportation from the territory of a Party.
( b ) *Exception.* If the relationship between the producer of a good and the seller of a material influenced the price actually paid or payable for the material, or if there is no price actually paid or payable by the producer for the material, the value of the material produced in the territory of one or both of the Parties includes the following: ( 1 ) All expenses incurred in the growth, production, or manufacture of the material, including general expenses;
( 2 ) A reasonable amount for profit; and
( 3 ) The freight, insurance, packing, and all other costs incurred in transporting the material to the producer's plant.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-98-59 December 9, 1998

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC DISPATCHES AUGMENTED INSPECTION TEAM TO REVIEW

FIRE AT PORTSMOUTH GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has dispatched an

Augmented Inspection Team (AIT) to review the circumstances

surrounding a fire which occurred this morning at the Portsmouth

Gaseous Diffusion Plant, operated by the U.S. Enrichment Corp.

(USEC) at Piketon, Ohio.

Preliminary information indicates that the fire -- which

began about 6:10 a.m. in an electric motor located in a process

building area -- was confined to that area and did not result in

any chemical or radioactive releases outside the cell housing.

Although some nearby equipment was damaged, no safety equipment

was affected.

The plant’s on-site fire brigade responded and extinguished

the fire in about two hours. Four workers were treated at the

plant for minor injuries from smoke inhalation and falls. About

24 people were evacuated from the building. At this time the

cause of the fire is not precisely known.

The Portsmouth plant uses a gaseous diffusion process to

enrich uranium hexafluoride gas in the uranium-235 isotope, so

that the material can be used as nuclear fuel in civilian nuclear

power plants.

An NRC inspector was at the plant site during the fire.

Inspectors from NRC headquarters and the regional midwest office,

who will serve on the special team, will arrive at the plant site

tonight. The AIT also will include chemical and fire protection

specialists.

When the inspection is completed, the inspectors will meet

with the company to discuss the preliminary findings. This

meeting will be open to public observation. The schedule and

location of the meeting will be announced later.
The NRC team will issue a written report which will be

available to the public several weeks after the completion of the

inspection.

###
#### § 132.4 Quota quantity entry limits.

At the opening of the quota no importer shall be permitted to present entries or withdrawals for consumption of quota-class merchandise for a quantity in excess of the quantity admissible under the applicable quota.
#### § 132.3 Observation of official hours.

An entry summary for consumption or a withdrawal for consumption for quota-class merchandise shall be presented only during official office hours, except as provided in §§ 132.12 and 141.62(b) of this chapter. For purposes of administering quotas, “official office hours” shall mean 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. in all time zones.

[T.D. 79-221, 44 FR 46814, Aug. 9, 1979]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 9:20-cv-61611-SMITH/VALLE

JOLANTA SARIS SZYFTER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ATLANTIC COAST ENTERPRISES, LLC

d/b/a ACE LUBE CENTERS, LLC,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND 

GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR APPROVAL AND ENTRY OF CONSENT DECREE

This matter is before the Court upon the Paperless Report and Recommendation to the 

District Judge [DE 8], in which Magistrate Judge Valle recommends granting the parties’ Joint 

Motion for Approval and Entry of Consent Decree [DE 6] in this action brought pursuant to Title 

III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq. No objections have been 

filed. Having reviewed, de novo, the Report of Magistrate Judge and the record, and given that 

there are no objections, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The Paperless Report and Recommendation to the District Judge [DE 8] is 

AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this Court’s Order.

2. The parties’ Joint Motion for Approval and Entry of Consent Decree [DE 6] is 

GRANTED. The Consent Decree, in the form annexed hereto, is APPROVED and ENTERED, 

with the Court retaining jurisdiction over this matter for the purpose of enforcement of the Consent 

Decree. 

Case 0:20-cv-61611-RS Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/09/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

3. This action is otherwise DISMISSED with prejudice with each party to bear their 

own fees and costs except as provided by the Consent Decree. 

4. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.

5. This case is CLOSED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 9th day of October, 2020.

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record

Case 0:20-cv-61611-RS Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/09/2020 Page 2 of 2
### §1843. Obsolete references

In any case in which—

(1) the rate of pay of, or any maximum or minimum rate of pay with respect to—

(A) any employee described in subparagraph (1) or subparagraph (2) of section 1841 of this title, or

(B) the position of such employee, or

(C) any class or group of such employees or positions,

is referred to in or provided by statute or other authority; and

(2) the rate so referred to or provided is a basic rate with respect to which additional pay is provided by law;

such statutory provision or authority shall be deemed to refer, in lieu of such basic rate, to the per annum gross rate which an employee receiving such basic rate immediately prior to the effective date of this section would receive, without regard to such statutory provision or authority, under section 1842 of this title on and after such date.

(Pub. L. 91–510, title IV, §483, Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1196.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The effective date of this section, referred to in text, means immediately prior to noon on Jan. 3, 1971. See section 601(1) of Pub. L. 91–510, set out as an Effective Date of 1970 Amendment note under section 4301 of this title.

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 166b–1c of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0001046529
<NAME> CENTRAL OIL CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              48                   5,435
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    48                   5,435
<PP&E>                                               0                   4,057
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      48                   9,492
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         6,002                   6,002
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,954)                 (3,490)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        48                   9,492
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,444                   1,008
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,444)                 (1,008)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,444)                 (1,008)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
§ 123.22 In-transit manifest. ( a ) *Manifest required.* A manifest in duplicate covering the in-transit merchandise which is to proceed under the provisions of this subpart shall be presented by the carrier to the Customs officer at each port of lading of a vessel, or at the port of exit of a vehicle. Where the merchandise is transported under Customs red in-bond seals and is accompanied by a transportation in-bond manifest, a separate in-transit manifest is not required.
( b ) *Additional copies.* In the following cases additional copies of the manifest shall be presented: ( 1 ) When the merchandise is to be transshipped in foreign territory under Customs supervision, a copy of the manifest for each place of transshipment shall be presented.
( 2 ) When a Customs officer requests an extra copy of the manifest as a record of the transaction.
( c ) *Manifest forms to be used.* The in-transit manifest forms to be used are: ( 1 ) For trucks, railroad cars or other overland carriers transiting Mexico a manifest on Customs Form 7512-B or 7533-C shall be presented.
( 2 ) For vessels of less than 5 net tons departing and arriving otherwise than by sea, a manifest on Customs Form 7512-B or 7533-C shall be presented. All other vessels are subject to the manifesting requirements contained in § 4.82 of this chapter.
( 3 ) For rail cars transiting Canada, a manifest on Customs Form 7533-C (Canada A4-1/2) shall be presented. For trains which will remain intact while transiting Canadian territory, a consolidated train manifest containing all the information included in the individual car manifests and the train sheet required by § 123.23 may be used in lieu of individual car manifests. For a number of cars which will transit Canada as a group, a consolidated manifest may be used, but a train sheet shall also be presented.
( 4 ) In all other cases where no in-transit manifest form is specified in this subpart, or in subpart E relating to truck shipments on the Canadian border, subpart F relating to commercial traveler's samples, and subpart G relating to baggage, Customs Form 7512-B or 7533-C shall be presented.
( d ) *Contents of in-transit manifest.* The information contained in the manifest shall correspond to the information contained in the waybill accompanying the shipment, except that: ( 1 ) The conveyance shall be identified in a suitable manner in the place provided for such identification.
( 2 ) The description of ladings made up of several shipments which are to go forward in a conveyance or compartment sealed with Customs seals shall be “miscellaneous shipments.”
( 3 ) When an in-transit rail shipment will enter and reenter Canada in a continuing movement en route to a final destination in the United States, only the final United States port of reentry shall be shown on the manifest.
[T.D. 70-121, 35 FR 8215, May 26, 1970, as amended by T.D. 82-145, 47 FR 35478, Aug. 16, 1982]
July 14, 2011 

Ms. Michelle Lee Oliver 

Falwell Aviation, Inc. d.b.a. Freedom Aviation 

310 Hangar Road 

Lynchburg, VA 24502 

Dear Ms. Oliver 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot 

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Cannot Process Your Request 

We entered your July 1, 2011, exemption request on behalf of Falwell Aviation, Inc. d.b.a. 

Freedom Aviation into the public docket (No. FAA-2011-0729), but we are unable to process 

your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of 

14 CFR 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us 

all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

 The specific reasons why you need to exercise the privileges of your exemption outside 

the United States. 
2 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we 

receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires you to 

send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the 

exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Ida M. Klepper 

Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

8 November 2005

(2005/C 276/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-005 January 10, 2003

NRC MEETING ON PROPOSED MOX FACILITY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is meeting with Duke Cogema Stone & Webster

(DCS) on January 15-16 to discuss chemical and nuclear criticality safety and confinement ventilation

related to the mixed oxide (MOX) fuel fabrication facility proposed for the Department of Energy’s

Savannah River site near Aiken, South Carolina. 

The meeting, which is open to the public for observation, will be held in Room O-7B4 each day

from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. at NRC Headquarters, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The

public will have opportunities to communicate with NRC staff after the business portion, but before the

meeting is adjourned. 

If NRC authorizes construction, DCS could begin building the MOX facility to convert surplus

weapons-grade plutonium, supplied by DOE, into MOX fuel for use in those commercial nuclear power

reactors authorized to use such fuel. Converting weapons-grade plutonium into MOX fuel advances the

cause of nonproliferation by converting the material into a form unsuitable for use in weapons. 

For additional information, contact Andrew Persinko at 301-415-6522 or by e-mail at

AXP1@nrc.gov .

###
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-01-018 June 20, 2001 

 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov 

 

NRC TO MEET WITH VIRGINIA POWER OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS

SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT SURRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Virginia Power officials on

Thursday, June 28, to discuss the results of NRC's annual assessment of safety performance at the

Surry nuclear power plant.

The meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m. in the Surry Nuclear Information Center Auditorium at

the plant site near Surry, Virginia. The public is invited to observe the meeting. NRC officials will be

available after the meeting to answer questions. The NRC will hold a second meeting with state and

local government officials after the first meeting. That second meeting is also open to the public.

A letter sent from NRC Region II to Virginia Power, which addresses plant safety performance

during the previous year and forms the basis of the meeting discussion, is available from the Region II

Office of Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr. Current information for

the plant is available at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SUR1/sur1_chart.html and

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SUR2/sur2_chart.html.

###
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 22
- 00674
- CV

Joseph Thompson and Thompson Custom Properties, LLC , Appellant s

v. Greg L. Gibson; DSRE Funding LLC; High Equity Investments, LLC; DSRE Holdings, LLC; DSRE Homes LLC; DSRE Centex P a rtners, LLC; GLG Investments LLC; Direct Effect LLC; Direct Effect Real Estate Services LLC; Clay Carter; and Marcia Trejo , Appellee s

FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY NO. 968
- 21 , THE HONORABLE CARSON TALMADGE CAMPBELL , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On October 25, 2022 , appellants Joseph Thompson and Th ompson Custom Properties , LLC filed their notice of appeal from the trial court ’ s final judgment, granting appellees ’ no - evidence motion for summary judgment an d di smissing appellants ’ cl aims

. On December 28, 2022, appellants filed a notice in this Court, stating that the trial court has granted
their motion for new tria l and that the ir appeal should be dismissed.

T h e j urisdiction of the Court is limited to th e re view of final judgmen ts and f rom certain interlocutory a ppea ls made immediately appealable by stat ute. Lehmann v. Har

- Co n Corp ., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) ; Tex. Civ

. Prac. & R em. Code §§ 51.012 , .014. When

a trial cour t grants a motio n for ne w trial , the court ’ s original judgment or o r der is set aside , and the parties proceed without prej udice from the prior proceedings. Markowitz v. Markowitz ,2

118 S.W.3d 82, 88 (T ex. App.

— Houston [1 4th Dist.] 2003, pe t. denied )

. “ [T] he court

es sent ially wip es the slate clea n and st arts over

. ” Wilkins v. Method ist Hea lthcare S ys. , 160 S.W.3d 559, 563 (Tex. 2005) ; see Tex. R. App. P. 2 1.9 ( b) ( “ Granting a new trial res tores the case to its position before the form er trial . . .

. ” )

.

Although appellants hav e no t fil ed a formal motion to dis miss , we take notice of
the trial court ’ s order granting t heir motio n for new trial. See Fannie Ma e v. Haddo x , No. 03

- 15

- 0000 6

- CV, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 4712, at *1 (Tex. App.

— A ustin May 8, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op.) ( takin g no ti ce of trial court ’ s order g ran ting mot ion for new trial and dismissing app eal for want of j ur isdiction). Bec ause there is no longer a final judgment over which we may exer cise appell ate j uris dictio n , we dismiss th e appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3 ( a)

.

__________________________________________ Chari L. Kelly , Justice
Before Justices Baker, Kelly, and Smith
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdic ti on Filed: J anuary 31, 2023
**Exhibit 23.1**
**Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-40457, 333-40459, 333-40461, 333-40333, 333-43622,333-67440, 333-97181 and 333-97179) pertaining tothe various stock issuance programs; and in the RegistrationStatements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-68202, 333-86440 and 333-108521) ofHypercom Corporation of our reports dated March 11, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of Hypercom Corporation, Hypercom Corporationmanagement’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Hypercom Corporation,included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2004.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Phoenix, Arizona