alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-00-02 January 14, 2000

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah

NRC to Hold "Roundtable Discussion" at Public Meeting

on New Reactor Oversight Program On January 20 in Cary

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with invited community leaders, industry

representatives and members of public interest groups for a "roundtable" discussion of the

agency's new reactor oversight process for the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant during a

public meeting on Thursday, January 20, in Cary.

The meeting will be at 7 p.m. in the Homewood Suites hotel at 100 Macalyson Court in Cary.

The roundtable discussion portion of the meeting will be open to public observation. Members

of the general public will have an opportunity to present their views to NRC officials afterward.

The Harris plant, operated by Carolina Power & Light, is one of nine nuclear plant sites with 13

reactors that are participating in a pilot program which began June 1 of last year. A public

meeting is planned for each plant site. Following a several month trial to determine if revisions

are needed, the process is expected to be extended this year to all 103 commercial nuclear

power reactors.

The NRC is seeking comments and suggestions from the public on its new reactor oversight

process, including the inspection and assessment programs to maintain safety, improve public

confidence, increase efficiency and effectiveness, and reduce unnecessary regulatory burden.

The changes reflect, in part, improvements in nuclear power plant safety performance over the

past 20 years. Plants that perform well will generally have less regulatory oversight than plants

that have problems.

The pilot plant sites are: (1) Salem 1 and 2, near Wilmington, Delaware, operated by Public

Service Electric & Gas; (2) Hope Creek near Wilmington, Delaware, operated by Public

Service Electric & Gas; (3) Fitzpatrick, near Oswego, New York, operated by the Power

Authority of the State of New York; (4) Shearon Harris, near Raleigh, North Carolina, operated

by Carolina Power & Light; (5) Sequoyah 1 and 2, near Chattanooga, Tennessee, operated by

the Tennessee Valley Authority; (6) Prairie Island 1 and 2, near Red Wing, Minnesota,

operated by Northern States Power Co.; (7) Quad Cities 1 and 2, near Cordova, Illinois,

operated by Commonwealth Edison Co.; (8) Ft. Calhoun, near Omaha, Nebraska, operated by

the Omaha Public Power District; and (9) Cooper, near Nebraska City, Nebraska, operated by

the Nebraska Public Power District.

Information on the new program, including a list of questions that will be discussed at the

roundtable meeting, is available on the NRC website at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/index.html .
**Exhibit
      23**


**Consent
        of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
 
 
 
 Board
        of
        Directors
 Guaranty
        Federal Bancshares, Inc.
 Springfield,
        Missouri
 
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
        333-47241, 333-31196, 333-65544, 333-83822 and 333-117918 on Forms S-8 of
        Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated February 3, 2006, relating
        to the consolidated balance sheets of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. as
        of
        December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements
        of
        income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31,
        2005 and 2004, the six-month period ended December 31, 2003, and for the
        year
        ended June 30, 2003, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
        of
        Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. for the period ended December 31,
        2005.
  **/s/BKD,** **LLP**
  
  March
        30,
        2006
 Springfield,
        Missouri
EFT Info

Kahn, Joseph to

:

Lynorae Benjamin, Steve Scofield

Cc

:

"Vielhauer, Trina"

Lynorae and Steve,

Hillsborough County confirmed that the facility is on track with the construction schedule we 

sent (attached again), which includes four phases that run until 2012. The full enclosure of 

existing equipment (Phase 1A) is scheduled to be completed in October 2010. There are 

enclosures associated with each phase, which are shown in the schedule, but as I understand it, 

these phases include new equipment to be installed. Construction started February 4, 2010, and 

contaminated soils have been remediated by now. All paving will not be completed until March 

2012.

An inspector from Hillsborough County took photos today that illustrate the extent of 

construction activities at the site and show how serious this effort is at rebuilding the facility.

Please take a look at those. (To keep the e-mail file size manageable I’ll send more photos in 

two more e-mails.) You’ll see why they won’t complete paving, for example, for some time.

Regarding the City of Tampa WWTP, Hillsborough County advised that the City operates a 

sludge dryer at the site. Sometimes lead waste is discarded in residential or commercial drains, 

so the sludge has a small lead content. It is a 75 MGD facility, so even a trace amount of a 

contaminant can appear to contribute to emissions. In this case, the lead was over estimated. 

Actual lead emissions from that site were most probably less than 100 pounds in 2005.

For the 2005 NEI, the City submitted a lead calculation and used an emission factor for sludge 

incineration -- not drying. Their factor assumed a hotter temperature, thus volatilizing more 

lead, and did not include control efficiency for their associated cyclone and RTO. The County
estimates that process operations and controls are such that only about 10% of the lead in sludge 

would have been emitted. So, again, the NEI appears to be a large overestimate.

Please let me know if you have other questions, or need more information. Thanks.

Joe

The Department of Environmental Protection values your feedback as a customer. DEP Secretary 

Michael W. Sole is committed to continuously assessing and improving the level and quality of services 

provided to you. Please take a few minutes to comment on the quality of service you received. Simply 

click on this link to the DEP Customer Survey. Thank you in advance for completing the survey.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Growth Properties, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John
Bucksbaum, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



                           (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
                    of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                    of 1934; and

                           (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly
                    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                    and results of operations of the Company.





/s/: John Bucksbaum
----------------------------------------
John Bucksbaum
May 8, 2003





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.













                                    38 of 39
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin E. Franklin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|                                    
|/s/ Martin E. Franklin              
|Martin E. Franklin                  
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|October 31, 2008                    

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jarden Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ian G.H. Ashken, Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|/s/ Ian G.H. Ashken                      
|Ian G.H. Ashken                          
|Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
|October 31, 2008
### §61a–4a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–342, §101, July 10, 1972, 86 Stat. 433, authorized Comptroller of Senate to appoint and fix compensation of an auditor in lieu of a secretary. Section was omitted in view of repeal of section 61a–4 of this title which authorized appointment of a Comptroller of Senate by President pro tempore of the Senate and the appointment by Comptroller of Senate of a secretary, and repeal of section 61a–5 of this title which set out duties of Comptroller of Senate, one of which was to appoint a secretary.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-22945-SCOLA

MINUTES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIAL

DAY 6 – Tuesday, March 7, 2023

CARNIVAL CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, 

VS. 

DeCURTIS CORPORATION,

DeCURTIS LLC.,

Defendants.

Counsel for Plaintiff: Steve Routh, Laura Najemy, Sheryl Garko, Roberto Uriarte, David Perrott, 

and Diana Fassbender.

Counsel for Defendants: Nicholas Groombridge, Jennifer Wu, Adam Schwartz, Daniel Klein,

and Geri Fischman.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COURT REPORTER: Sharon Pell-Velazco

MISCELLANEOUS: 

• Jury trial held. 

• Plaintiff’s witnesses sworn and testified: Erik de la Iglesia, James Learish, and 

Mary Coleman.

• Plaintiff rested at 5:25 p.m.

• Defendants’ witness sworn and testified: Joseph Carino. 

• Jury trial recessed at 5:45 p.m. 

• Jury trial will resume at 8:15 a.m. on Wednesday, March 8, 2023. 

Case 1:20-cv-22945-RNS Document 552 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/08/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### § 5.86 Records involved in litigation or other judicial process.

Subpoenas duces tecum issued pursuant to litigation or any other adjudicatory proceeding in which the United States is a party shall be referred to the Chief Counsel.

[81 FR 83643, Nov. 22, 2016]
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Agnes P. Faile et al., as Executors of and Trustees under the Will of Laura E. Purdy, Deceased, Appellants-Respondents. Highlands of White Plains, Inc., Respondent-Appellant; Hazel H. McKinney et al., Respondents.

On appeal by appellants-respondents from so much of the decree which directs the reservation of assets to pay the contingent claim of Mosher and Dunagan, the appeal is dismissed, without costs. Where the devised land subject to a mortgage has a value coneededly less than the arrears of taxes both as of the date of decedent’s death and as of the date of the filing of the petition for accounting, *787the provisions of section 250 of the Real Property Law do not prevent a present unconditional payment of the total amount of the mortgage debt without the necessity of a reservation of assets under section 207 of the Surrogate’s Court Act. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and Mac-Crate, JJ. [See *post,*p. 858.]
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**
I, William D. Green, Chief Executive Officer of Accenture Ltd, the generalpartner of Accenture SCA, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Annual Report”)of Accenture SCA (the “Registrant”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this AnnualReport;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financialinformation included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;  4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this Annual Report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this Annual Report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.    /s/ WILLIAM D. GREEN   Chief Executive Officer ofAccenture Ltd(principal executive officer)
Dated: November 4, 2004
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle, IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. III-01-029 July 2, 2001

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS

SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT THE POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with Nuclear Management Company officials

July 9 to discuss the NRCís annual assessment of safety performance at the Point Beach Nuclear

Power Plant near Two Rivers, Wisconsin.

The meeting will begin at 1 p.m. CDT and will be held at the plantís Energy Information

Center, 6610 Nuclear Road, north of Two Rivers. The public is invited to observe the meeting. NRC

officials will be available afterwards to answer questions.

The annual assessment, referred to as the End-of-Cycle assessment, evaluates safety

performance at the Point Beach plant from April 2000 through March 2001, and informs plant officials

of the NRCís plans for future inspections at the facility.

The Point Beach assessment letter and inspection report are available at

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr or from the Region III Public Affairs Office. Current performance

information for the plant is available at http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html.

# # #
§ 122.86 Substitution of aircraft. ( a ) *Application.* The residue cargo procedure applies when an airline must substitute aircraft to reach a destination due to weather conditions or operational factors which prevent an aircraft on arrival of the flight at the first port from continuing inbound to interior ports scheduled for that flight.
( b ) *Clearance and entry.* Clearance and entry of substitute aircraft is required as provided in this subpart for other aircraft.
( c ) *Identification.* An identification of all substitute aircraft shall be clearly made on all clearance and entry documents.
( d ) *Transporting cargo* — ( 1 ) *Forwarding.* The carrier may forward all cargo which arrived on one aircraft by transferring it to another aircraft of the same airline to complete the inbound flight. The transfer shall be done under Customs supervision.
( 2 ) *Conditions.* All of the residue cargo from more than one inbound flight of an airline may be laden on one substitute aircraft of the airline. The substitute aircraft shall finish the inbound transport of the residue cargo.
yearID sourceTypeID sourceTypePopulation

2024 11 140 2024 21 2898 2024 31 2118 2024 32 706 2024 41 4 2024 42 2 2024 43 28 2024 51 3 2024 52 132 2024 53 19 2024 54 32 2024 61 58 2024 62 80
#### Harrie T. Lindeberg and Others v. Thomas M. Hodgens.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### Part B—Administrative Provisions
§ 162.62 Permissible controlled substances on vessels, aircraft, and individuals. Upon compliance with the provisions of the Controlled Substances Act (84 Stat. 1242; 21 U.S.C. 801), the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (84 Stat. 1285; 21 U.S.C. 951), and the regulations of the Drug Enforcement Administration (21 CFR 1301.28, 1311.27), controlled substances listed in schedules I through V of the Controlled Substances Act may be held: ( a ) On vessels engaged in international trade in medicine chests and dispensaries.
( b ) In aircraft operated by an air carrier under a certificate or permit issued by the Federal Aviation Administration for stocking in medicine chests and first aid packets.
( c ) By an individual where lawfully obtained for personal medical use or for administration to an animal accompanying him to enter or depart the United States.
[T.D. 72-211, 37 FR 16488, Aug. 15, 1972, as amended by T.D. 78-99, 43 FR 13062, Mar. 29, 1978]
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION 

 CASE NO.: 0:20-cv-61584-RAR

HOWARD COHAN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

HOLMAN AUTOMOTIVE, INC.,

a Florida Profit Corporation

Defendant(s).

____________________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

The Plaintiff, HOWARD COHAN and the Defendant HOLMAN AUTOMOTIVE, INC., 

a Florida Profit Corporation, (the Parties) hereby stipulate that (1) the Parties have settled this 

action; (2) Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses this action with prejudice against HOLMAN 

AUTOMOTIVE, INC., a Florida Profit Corporation.; (3) the Parties shall bear their own costs and 

fees except as provided for in the Parties’ Settlement Agreement.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED October 20, 2020.

By: /s/ Gregory S. Sconzo

Gregory S. Sconzo, Esq.

Florida Bar No.: 0105553

Sconzo Law Office, P.A.

3825 PGA Boulevard, Suite 207

Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410

Telephone: (561) 729-0940

Facsimile: (561) 491-9459

Email: greg@sconzolawoffice.com

Secondary Email: alexa@sconzolawoffice.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

By: /s/ Cathy M. Stutin

Cathy M. Stutin, Esquire

Fla. Bar No. 865011

cstutin@fisherphillips.com

Fisher & Phillips LLP

450 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 800

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

Telephone (954) 525-4800

Facsimile (954) 525-8739

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 0:20-cv-61584-RAR Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 20, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document 

is being served this day on counsel of record in this action via transmission of Notices of Electronic 

Filing generated by CM/ECF.

_ /s/ Gregory S. Sconzo

Gregory S. Sconzo, Esq.

Case 0:20-cv-61584-RAR Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2020 Page 2 of 2