alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June
30, 2004, of Synagro Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
C. Boucher, Jr., certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company and that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                    /s/ Robert C. Boucher, Jr.
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Robert C. Boucher, Jr.
                                    October 20, 2004
### §6101. Transfer of funds from appropriations account of the Office of the Vice President and the Offices of the Secretaries for the Majority and Minority to the Senate contingent fund

#### (a) Office of the Vice President

#### (1) In general

Upon the written request of the Vice President, the Secretary of the Senate shall transfer from the appropriations account appropriated under the subheading "office of the vice president" under the heading "Salaries, Officers and Employees" such amount as the Vice President shall specify to the appropriations account under the heading "miscellaneous items" within the contingent fund of the Senate.

#### (2) Authority to incur expenses

The Vice President may incur such expenses as may be necessary or appropriate. Expenses incurred by the Vice President shall be paid from the amount transferred under paragraph (1) by the Vice President and upon vouchers approved by the Vice President.

#### (3) Authority to advance sums

The Secretary of the Senate may advance such sums as may be necessary to defray expenses incurred in carrying out paragraphs (1) and (2).

#### (b) Offices of the Secretaries for the Majority and Minority

#### (1) In general

Upon the written request of the Secretary for the Majority or the Secretary for the Minority, the Secretary of the Senate shall transfer from the appropriations account appropriated under the subheading "offices of the secretaries for the majority and minority" under the heading "Salaries, Officers and Employees" such amount as the Secretary for the Majority or the Secretary for the Minority shall specify to the appropriations account under the heading "miscellaneous items" within the contingent fund of the Senate.

#### (2) Authority to incur expenses

The Secretary for the Majority or the Secretary for the Minority may incur such expenses as may be necessary or appropriate. Expenses incurred by the Secretary for the Majority or the Secretary for the Minority shall be paid from the amount transferred under paragraph (1) by the Secretary for the Majority or the Secretary for the Minority and upon vouchers approved by the Secretary for the Majority or the Secretary for the Minority, as applicable.

#### (3) Authority to advance sums

The Secretary of the Senate may advance such sums as may be necessary to defray expenses incurred in carrying out paragraphs (1) and (2).

#### (c) Effective date

This section shall apply to fiscal year 2005 and each fiscal year thereafter.

(Pub. L. 108–447, div. G, title I, §5, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3169.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 31a–2d of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2005, which is div. G of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005.
#### § 68.2 Definitions.

The definitions set forth in part 59 of this subchapter are applicable to this part.

[47 FR 23449, May 29, 1982, as amended at 49 FR 33879, Aug. 27, 1984]
Placeholder: C onfidential Business I nformation item

Adva nced Refrigerant Technologies CBI Comment on 2 - 6 - 1 2 For more information please contact David Don aldson by phone at 202 - 343 - 9086 or by email at donaldson.david@epa.gov .
#### Concepcion Carrillo et al., Appellants, v. Green Bus Lines, Inc., Respondent.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff wife while she was attempting to board a bus, and by her husband for medical expenses and loss of services. Judgment for defendant, dismissing the complaint on the merits at the close of the entire case, reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event. The motion to dismiss should not have been granted since there was evidence which, if credited by the jury, would have sustained the conclusion that a prima facie case had been established as to the identity of the bus, the negligence of the defendant, and the plaintiff wife’s freedom from contributory negligence. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
#### § 112.28 Production of license.

Inspectors or other Customs officers may require any person claiming to be a licensed customhouse cartman or lighterman to produce his license for inspection.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-090 June 9, 2000

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND ON JUNE 28 AND 29

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has

scheduled a meeting of its subcommittee on reliability and probabilistic risk assessment on June 28 and

29 in Rockville, Maryland.

On June 28, the subcommittee will discuss the proposed final American Society of Mechanical

Engineers (ASME) Standard related to probabilistic risk assessment quality. The following day it will

review the status of risk-informed revisions to Part 50, “Domestic Licensing of Production and

Utilization Facilities, ” of the Commission’s regulations in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

The subcommittee will discuss a proposed revision to 10 CFR 50.44 concerning combustible gas

control systems, issues identified in a Nuclear Energy Institute letter dated last January 19, and public

comments relating to the proposed regulation 10 CFR 50.69 and associated Appendix T.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s

Two White Flint Building, at 11545 Rockville Pike, starting at 8:30 a.m. each day.

Those who seek additional information on the meeting or schedule changes should contact

Michael Markley, at 301-415-6885.

Other aspects of the meeting remain the same as published in the May 8 edition of the Federal

Register. ACRS meeting notices, transcripts and letter reports are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW.

###
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23609]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MORRIS K. UDALL SCHOLARSHIP AND EXCELLENCE IN NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL 
POLICY FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 9 a.m. to 12 p.m., Friday, November 12, 2004.

Place:  The offices of the Morris K. Udall Scholarship and Excellence 
in National Environmental Policy Foundation, 130 South Scott Avenue, 
Tucson, AZ 85701.

Status:  This meeting will be open to the public, unless it is 
necessary for the Board to consider items in executive session.

Matters to be Considered: (1) A report on the U.S. Institute for 
Environmental Conflict Resolution; (2) A report from the Udall Center 
for Studies in Public Policy; (3) A report on the Native Nations 
Institute; (4) Program Reports; and (5) A Report from the Management 
Committee.

Portions Open to the Public:  All sessions with the exception of the 
session listed below.

Portions Closed to the Public: Executive session.

Contact Person for More Information: Christopher L. Helms, Executive 
Director, 130 South Scott Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85701, (520) 670-5529.

    Dated: October 15, 2004.
Christopher L. Helms,
Executive Director, Morris K. Udall Scholarship and Excellence in 
National Environmental Policy Foundation, and Federal Register Liaison 
Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-23609 Filed 10-18-04; 2:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-FN-M
§ 114.12 Termination of approval. ( a ) *For cause.* The Commissioner may suspend or revoke the approval previously given to any issuing association or guaranteeing association for failure or refusal to comply with the duties, obligations, or requirements set forth in its written undertaking on which the approval was based; in the applicable Customs Convention; or in the customs regulations; or upon termination of the affiliation with an appropriate international organization required by § 114.11(a). Before such suspension or revocation, the Commissioner shall give the association a reasonable opportunity to refute the alleged failure of compliance.
( b ) *Withdrawal.* To be relieved of future obligations, an approved guaranteeing association must notify the Commissioner, in writing, not less than 6 months in advance of a specified termination date that it will not guarantee the payment of obligations under carnets accepted by district directors of Customs after the specified date. The receipt of such notice by the Commissioner will in no way affect the responsibility of the guaranteeing association for payment of claims on carnets accepted by district directors before the designated termination date.
( c ) *Notice.* Notice of the suspension or revocation of the approval of an issuing association or a guaranteeing association, or of the withdrawal of an approved guaranteeing association, with respect to a Customs Convention to which the United States has acceded will be published in the Federal Register by the Commissioner.
[T.D. 70-134, 35 FR 9261, June 13, 1970, as amended by T.D. 71-70, 36 FR 4490, Mar. 6, 1971]
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.211 Applicability.

Title I of Public Law 106-200 (114 Stat. 251), entitled the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), authorizes the President to extend certain trade benefits to designated countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Section 112 of the AGOA, codified at 19 U.S.C. 3721, provides for the preferential treatment of certain textile and apparel articles from beneficiary countries. The provisions of §§ 10.211-10.217 of this part set forth the legal requirements and procedures that apply for purposes of extending preferential treatment pursuant to section 112.
#### Viennese Melody, Inc., Respondent, *v.*Majestic Refrigerator Corp., Appellant.

First Department,

December 18, 1951.

*Selig Kaplan*of counsel *(Edward H.*Freiberger, attorney), for appellant.

*Lewis Herman*for respondent.

Cohn, J.

Defendant installed an air conditioning system in plaintiff’s restaurant with the understanding that it was to be in good working order. Part of the purchase price was paid in advance and plaintiff agreed to make deferred payments of the balance.

*244Notwithstanding that defendant for approximately a year after the installation endeavored on numerous occasions to have the cooling system function, it did not succeed in doing so. To avoid a loss in its restaurant "business, plaintiff finally called in another air conditioning firm which made extensive repairs and replacements.

In its complaint the only damage pleaded was the loss of business and good will resulting from plaintiff’s inability to furnish its customers with cool and comfortable surroundings. No attempt was made on the trial to prove such injury. The trial court, however, over objection of defendant, admitted evidence as to the repairs and the cost thereof to plaintiff. Defendant rebutted such evidence. That issue was therefore fully litigated.

Thereafter the trial court rendered its decision awarding plaintiff the amount of the expenses incurred in having the necessary repairs and replacements made. It was held, too, that plaintiff was not required to pay the balance of the purchase price due to defendant for the air conditioning system.

There is clearly no basis for the cancellation of the indebtedness due defendant from plaintiff which constitutes the balance of the purchase price of the air conditioning system, plaintiff having retained the plant and having failed to offer to return the machine.

The award to the plaintiff for the repairs is not excessive. All of the repair work is directly traceable to the fault of the defendant. The wear and tear on certain parts of the equipment did not result from the ordinary use of the machinery, but from the many futile attempts to make it operate suitably.

At the conclusion of the trial though plaintiff moved to conform the pleading to the proof, the trial court denied the motion. In the circumstances we think that motion should have been granted. *(Guenther*v. *Amsden,*16 App. Div. 607, 609, affd. 162 N. Y. 601.) Accordingly, the award of $1,200 as damages for the reasonable value of repairs necessarily made was proper.

The judgment should be modified, with costs to appellant, by eliminating therefrom the provisions relating to the cancellation of plaintiff’s indebtedness to defendant, and as so modified, the judgment should be affirmed. Settle order containing appropriate findings in accordance herewith.

Glennon, J. P., Dore, Callahan and Shientag, JJ., concur.

*245Judgment unanimously modified by eliminating therefrom the provisions relating to the cancellation of plaintiff’s indebtedness to defendant and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to the appellant. Settle order on notice containing appropriate findings in accordance with the opinion herein.
###### Editorial Note on Part 159

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93023, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 159.42 Discriminating duties.

The discriminating duties provided for in subsection 1 of paragraph J, section IV, Tariff Act of 1913, as amended by the Act of March 4, 1915 (19 U.S.C. 128, 131), and the discriminating duties and penalties provided for in section 338, Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1338), shall be imposed only in pursuance of specific instructions from the Commissioner of Customs.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-cv-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff 

vs. 

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTION GROUP, 

INC. D/B/A PAR FUNDING, ET AL.,

Defendant(s).

_________________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Daniel L. Rashbaum, Esq. hereby enters his appearance as counsel on behalf of Defendant 

Perry S. Abbonizio in the above-captioned matter, and respectfully requests that copies of all future 

pleadings, orders, and other papers be provided to the undersigned.

Date: August 3, 2020

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Daniel L. Rashbaum

Daniel L. Rashbaum

Fla Bar No. 75084

MARCUS NEIMAN RASHBAUM & 

PINEIRO LLP 

2 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1750

Miami, Florida 33131

Telephone: (305) 400-4260

drashbaum@mnrlawfirm.com 

Counsel for Perry S. Abbonizio

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 65 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/03/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 3, 2020, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was 

served via CM/ECF on all counsel or parties of record.

By: /s/ Daniel L. Rashbaum

Daniel L. Rashbaum

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 65 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/03/2020 Page 2 of 2
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-28 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, February 16, 1999)

NRC ADDS A THIRD VIDEO CONFERENCE SITE ON HEARING

CONCERNING RIVER BEND, PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has added a third site for the public to participate

in an informal hearing on two petitions requesting that the NRC immediately shut down the

River Bend Station and Perry Nuclear Power Plant and that it suspend or modify their operating

licenses. River Bend Station is located in St. Francisville, Louisiana. The Perry Nuclear Power

Plant is located in Perry, Ohio.

The hearing will be held in response to petitions filed by the Union of Concerned

Scientists last fall that raise concerns about pinhole leaks in the metal cladding surrounding

uranium fuel in the plants’ reactor cores.

The additional video conferencing site will be at the Lake Erie College Arthur S. Holden

Center, Painesville, Ohio. The hearing will be held at 1:00 p.m. on February 22 at NRC

Headquarters in Rockville, Maryland.

Members of the public unable to attend the NRC hearing will be able to participate via

video teleconferencing at three sites. In addition to Painesville, these include the Center For

Instructional Telecommunications, Room 202, Coates Hall, Louisiana State University, Baton

Rouge, Louisiana, and the Forum Conference and Education Center, Inc., One Cleveland

Center Office Building, 1375 East 9th Street, Cleveland, Ohio.

##
§ 70.4 Review by the Administrator. The Administrator, after reviewing the scientific or technical information submitted under the provisions of § 70.3, shall notify the applicant in writing of his/her determination within 60 days after we receive the applicant's scientific or technical information that we have compared either the ground elevations of an entire legally defined parcel of land or the elevation of the lowest adjacent grade to a structure with the elevation of the base flood and that: ( a ) The property is within a designated A, A0, A1-30, AE, AH, A99, AR, AR/A1-30, AR/AE, AR/AO, AR/AH, AR/A, V0, V1-30, VE, or V Zone, and will state the basis of such determination; or
( b ) The property should not be within a designated A, A0, A1-30, AE, AH, A99, AR, AR/A1-30, AR/AE, AR/AO, AR/AH, AR/A,V0, V1-30, VE, or V Zone and that we will modify the FHBM or FIRM accordingly; or
( c ) The property is not within a designated A, A0, A1-30, AE, AH, A99, AR, AR/A1-30, AR/AE, AR/AO, AR/AH, AR/A,V0, V1-30, VE, or V Zone as shown on the FHBM or FIRM and no modification of the FHBM or FIRM is necessary; or
( d ) We need an additional 60 days to make a determination.
[66 FR 33900, June 26, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 141
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 141.111 Carrier's release order. ( a ) *When required.* Except where release is made directly to the carrier in accordance with § 141.11(b), no merchandise shall be released from Customs custody until a release order has been executed by the carrier, or, in the case of merchandise in a bonded warehouse, by the warehouse proprietor.
( b ) *Form of release.* The release order may be executed on any of the following documents: ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) The official entry form;
( 3 ) A combined carrier's certificate and release order issued in accordance with § 141.11(a)(4); or
( 4 ) If a certified duplicate bill of lading or air waybill is used for entry purposes in accordance with § 141.11(a)(3), the carrier's release order may be endorsed thereon in substantially the following form: In accordance with the provisions of section 484(j), Tariff Act of 1930, authority is hereby given to release the articles covered by this certified duplicate bill of lading or air waybill to: ________________________.
( c ) *Blanket release order.* Merchandise may be released to the person named in the bill of lading or air waybill in the absence of a specific release order from the carrier, if the carrier concerned has filed a blanket order authorizing release to the owner or consignee in such cases. A carrier's certificate in the form shown in § 141.11(a)(4), may be modified and executed to make it a blanket release order for the shipments covered by a blanket carrier's release order under § 141.11(a)(5).
( d ) *Qualified release order.* In the case of merchandise which is entered for warehousing, for transportation in bond, for exportation, or is to be admitted to a foreign trade zone, the release order may be qualified as follows: ( 1 ) “For transfer to the bonded warehouse designated in the warehouse entry,” if the merchandise is entered for warehousing;
( 2 ) “For transfer to the bonded carrier designated in the transportation entry,” if the merchandise is entered for transportation in bond;
( 3 ) “For transfer to the carrier designated in the export entry,” if the merchandise is entered for exportation; or
( 4 ) “For transfer to the foreign trade zone designated in Customs Form 214,” if the merchandise is to be admitted to a foreign trade zone.
[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17447, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 78-394, 43 FR 49788, Oct. 25, 1978; T.D. 86-16, 51 FR 5063, Feb. 11, 1986; T.D. 87-75, 52 FR 20068, May 29, 1987; T.D. 90-87, 55 FR 47052, Nov. 9, 1990]
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 98-14 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson April 15, 1998

OFFICE: 817/860-8128

PAGER: (800) 443-7243 (065477)

E-MAIL: bwh@nrc.gov

JIM SPETS ASSIGNED RESIDENT INSPECTOR

FOR NRC AT WNP-2

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has assigned Jim Spets as resident

inspector at the WNP-2 nuclear power plant operated by the Washington Public Power

Supply System near Richland, Washington. Mr. Spets assumed his post on April 6.

Mr. Spets is a 1987 graduate of Arizona State University with a bachelor of

science in Mechanical Engineering. He has worked as a nuclear shift test engineer at

the Mare Island Naval Shipyard for six years and as an operational readiness engineer

for the Westinghouse Hanford Company for two years.

He joined the NRC as an inspector in the Transportation and Storage Inspection

Section at the agency’s Maryland headquarters in 1996. Mr. Spets joins Scott Boyton,

who is the senior resident inspector, at WNP-2.

Mr. Spets will be residing in Richland with his wife Sue and two children, Trevor

(2) and Madeline (4 months).

###