UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

M iam iDivision

CaseNo.1:20-cv-23159-AM C

FILED BY PG D.C

2ES 012222

cAuNEGaExUJsE.nNloslajE s. n.oFFLk.-Moij'cj

IKSA EXIM ,INC.,aFloridacom oration

andIZHAK K ASHAN I,anindividual

Plaintiff

VS.

LAW RENCE ALLOUCHE TU aLARRY

ALLOUCHE JUaLARRY ALUSH r d

ARIEL LLC,aPelmsylvanialim itedliability

company,

Defendants

THE DEFENDANT'SANSW ER TO THE COM PLAINT

N0W COM ESDefendantLany AlloucheandArielLLC,ProSe,filesthisANSW ER to

PlaintiffsComplaintW ITH NEW M ATTER.Insupportofsam e,theyaverasfollowing:

1. DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationtofonnulateananswerto

paragraph 1;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 1isDENIED.

2. DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesum cientinformationtoformulateananswertoparagraph

2,'thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph2isDENIED.

3. ADM ITTED.

4. ADM ITTED.

5. DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesufficientinform ationtoform ulatean answerto

paragraph5;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph5isDENIED.

J'URISDICTION

6. DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesuftk ientinform ationtoform ulatean answerto

paragraph 6;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph6isDENIED .

G ENER AL ALLEGATIONS

7. ADM ITTED.

Case 1:20-cv-23159-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2020 Page 1 of 19
8. ADM ITTED.

9. DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesufficientinform ationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph9;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph9isDENIED.

10.DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesufficientinform ationto form ulateananswerto

paragraph 10;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 10 isDENIED.

11.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph 11;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 11isDENIED.

12.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufticientinfonnationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph 12;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 12 isDENIED.

13.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufticientinfonnationto form ulateananswerto

paragraph 13;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 13isDENIED.

14.DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesufticientinform ationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph 14;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 14 isDENIED.

15.DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesufticientinfonnationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph 15;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 15isDENIED.

16.DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesufficientinform ationtofonnulateananswerto

paragraph 16;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 16 isDENIED.

17.DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesufficientinform ationtoform ulatean answerto

paragraph 17;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 17isDENIED.

18.DEN IED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinform ationtofonnulatean answerto

paragraph 18;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 18isDENIED.

a. DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesufficientinfonnationtofonnulatean

answertosub-paragrapht1a'';thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph

çça''isDENIED.

Case 1:20-cv-23159-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2020 Page 2 of 19
DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesuftk ientinform ationtoformulatean

answertosub-paragraphé+'';thereforetheDefendantsresponsetosubparagraphSçb''isDENIED.

DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinform ationtoformulatean

answertosub-paragraph11c'';thereforetheDefendantsresponsetosubparagraphtçc''isDEN IED.

19.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesuftk ientinformationtofonnulateananswerto

paragraph 19;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 19isDENIED .

20.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph 20;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph20isDENIED .

21.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesuffcientinform ation toform ulateananswerto

paragraph 21;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph21isDENIED .

22.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinform ationtoform ulatean answerto

paragraph22;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph22isDENIED .

23.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesuffcientinfonnationtofonuulateananswerto

paragraph23;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph23isDENIED .

a. DEN IED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationto fonnulatean

answertosub-paragraphtça'''thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph

tûa''isDEN IED.

DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesuftk ientinformationto fonnulatean

answertosub-paragraphû%'';thereforetheDefendantsresponsetosubparagraphEtb''isDEN IED.

DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesufscientinformationtofonnulatean

answerto sub-paragraph:T'';thereforetheDefendantsresponsetosubParagraphtlc''isDENIED .

d. DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesuffcientinformationtoform ulatean

answertosub-paragraph<çd'';thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph

tld''isDENIED.

e. DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtoformulatean

answertosub-paragraphû1e'';thereforetheDefendantsresponsetosubParagraphçle''isDENIED.

Case 1:20-cv-23159-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2020 Page 3 of 19
f. DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesuftk ientinformationtoformulatean

answertosub-paragraph t4f';thereforetheDefendantsresponseto subparagraphtlf''isDENIED .

24.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph24;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph24 isDEN IED.

25.DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesufficientinfonnationto form ulateananswerto

paragraph25;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph25isDEN IED.

26.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufticientinformationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph26;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 26isDENIED.

27.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtofonnulateananswerto

paragraph27;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph27isDEN IED.

28.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph28;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 28isDEN IED.

29.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesuftk ientinformationtofonnulateananswerto

paragraph29;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph29isDEN IED.

i) DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesuftkientinfonnationtofonnulate

ananswertosub-paragraphi);thereforetheDefendantsresponsetosubparagraphi)isDENIED.

ii) DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesuffkientinformationtoformulate

ananswertosub-paragraphii);thereforetheDefendantsresponsetosubparagraphi)isDENIED.

ii) Defendantsdonothavethesufticientinfonnationtoformulateananswer

tosub-paragraphii);thereforetheDefendantsresponsetosub-paragraph

ii)isDENIED.

iv) DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationtoformulate

ananswertosub-paragraphivl',thereforetheDefendantsresponsetosubparagraphiv)isDENIED.

v) DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesuffkientinfonnationtoformulate

ananswertosub-paragraphv);thereforetheDefendantsresponsetosubparagraphv)isDENIED.

vi) DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtofonnulate

ananswertosub-paragraphvi);thereforetheDefendantsresponsetosubparagraphvi)isDENIED.

Case 1:20-cv-23159-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2020 Page 4 of 19
vi) DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesuftkientinformationtoformulate

ananswertosub-paragraphvi);thereforetheDefendantsresponsetosubparagraphvi)isDENIED.

vi) Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationtoformulateananswer

tosub-paragraphvii);thereforetheDefendantsresponsetosub-paragraph

viii)isDENIED.

30.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinform ationtoform ulatean answerto

paragraph30;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph30isDENIED .

31.DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesufficientinformationtofom mlateananswerto

paragraph31;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph31isDENIED.

32.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph32;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 32 isDEN IED.

33.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufticientinfonnationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph33;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph33isDENIED.

34.DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesufficientinfonnationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph34;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph34isDENIED.

35.DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesuftk ientinformationtofonnulateananswerto

paragraph35;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 35isDEN IED.

36.DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesufticientinformationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph36;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph36 isDENIED.

37.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph37;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 37isDENIED.

38.DENIED Defendantsdonothavethesufticientinform ationto formulateananswerto

paragraph38;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph38isDENIED.

39.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph39;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 39isDEN IED.

40.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph40;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph40isDEN IED.

Case 1:20-cv-23159-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2020 Page 5 of 19
41.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph41;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph41isDENIED.

42.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinform ationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph42;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph42 isDENIED.

43.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationto formulateananswerto

paragraph43;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph43isDENIED.

44.DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesufficientinform ationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph44;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph44 isDEN IED.

45.DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesufficientinform ationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph44;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph44 isDEN IED.

46.DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesufficientinformationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph46;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph46isDEN IED.

47.DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesuftk ientinfonnationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph47;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph47isDENIED.

48.DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesuftk ientinformationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph48;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph48isDEN IED.

49.DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesuftk ientinformationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph49;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph49isDENIED.

50.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesuftk ientinformationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph50;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph50isDEN IED.

51.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph51;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph51isDENIED.

52.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufûcientinfonnationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph 52;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph52isDENIED.

53.DENIED .Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinform ationtoformulatean answerto

paragraph 53;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph53isDENIED.

Case 1:20-cv-23159-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2020 Page 6 of 19
54.DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesufficientinform ationto form ulateananswerto

paragraph54;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 54 isDENIED.

55.DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesufficientinformationtofonnulateananswerto

paragraph 55;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 55isDENIED.

56.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph 56;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 56isDENIED.

57.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtoform ulateanansw erto

paragraph 57;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph57isDENIED.

58.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtofonnulateananswerto

paragraph 58;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph58isDENIED.

59,DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph 59;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph59isDENIED.

60.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufticientinformationtofonnulateananswerto

paragraph60;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 60isDEN IED.

61.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesuftk ientinformationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph61;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph61isDEN IED.

CO UNT I

62.Defendantsherebyincom oratebyreferencetheaboveparagraphsasiffullysetforth

hereinatlength.

63.DENIED .Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtofonnulateananswerto

paragraph63;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph63isDEN IED.

64.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationtofonnulateananswerto

paragraph64;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph63isDENIED.

65.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesuffcientinform ationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph65;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph65isDENIED.

66.DENIED .Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph66;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph66isDENIED.

Case 1:20-cv-23159-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2020 Page 7 of 19
67.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtofommlateananswexto

paragraph 67;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph67isDENIED.

COUNT 11

68.Defendantsherebyincom oratetheaboveparagraphsbyreferenceasiffully setforth

hereinatlength.

69.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufscientinformationtoformulateananswerto

pazagraph 69;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph69isDENIED.

70.DENIED .Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph 70;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph70isDENIED.

71.DENIED .Defendantsdonothavethesufticientinfonnationtofonnulateananswerto

paragraph 71;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph71isDENIED.

72.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufticientinform ationtoform ulatean answerto

paragraph 72;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph72isDENIED.

73.DENIED .Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinform ationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph 73;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph73isDENIED.

COUNT IIl

74.Defendantsherebyincorporatetheaboveparagraphsbyreferenceasiffully setforth

hereinatlength.

75.DENIED .Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinform ationtoformulatean answerto

paragraph 75;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetopazagraph75isDENIED .

76.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinform ationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph 76;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph76isDENIED.

77.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesuffcientinform ationtoform ulatean answerto

paragraph77;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 77isDENIED.

78.DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesufticientinfonnationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph78;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 78isDENIED.

Case 1:20-cv-23159-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2020 Page 8 of 19
79.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph79;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 79 isDENIED.

80.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinform ationtofonnulatean answerto

paragraph80;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 80isDENIED.

81.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufticientinfonnationtoform ulatean answerto

paragraph 81;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 81isDEN IED.

82,DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph 82;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 82isDEN IED.

83.DENIED.Defendantsdo nothavethesufficientinfonuationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph 83;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 83isDEN IED.

84.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufticientinformationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph 84;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 84 isDEN IED.

COUNT IV

Defendantsherebyincorporatetheaboveparagraphs(1-84)byreferenceasiffullyset

forthherein atlength.H owever.itshould benoted thatPlaintiffs'next45

(approximatelv)arecompletelvoutofnumericalorder.Defendantwillnumbere-ac--h

responseaccordinztothenum bersthatshould berenectedinPlaintiffcom plainf.

85.Defendantsherebyincom oratetheaboveparagraphsbyreferenceasiffully setforth

hereinatlength.

86.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph 86;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph86isDEN IED.

87,DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtofonnulateananswerto

paragraph 87;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph87isDENIED.

88.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtofonnulateananswerto

paragraph 88;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph89isDENIED.

89.DENIED .Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph 89;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph89isDENIED.

Case 1:20-cv-23159-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2020 Page 9 of 19
90.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufticientinform ationtofonnulatean answerto

paragraph90;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph90isDENIED.

91.DENIED .Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationtoformulatean answerto

paragraph 91;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph91isDENIED .

COUNT V

92.Defendantsherebyincom oratetheaboveparagraphsbyreferenceasiffully setforth

herein atlength.

93.DENIED .Defendantsdonothavethesufticientinform ationtofonnulatean answerto

paragraph 93;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph93isDENIED.

94.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufticientinform ationtofonnulatean answerto

paragraph 94;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph94isDENIED.

95.DEN IED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinform ationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph 95;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph95isDENIED.

96.DENIED .Defendantsdonothavethesuftk ientinfonnationtofonnulatean answerto

paragraph96;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph96isDENIED .

97.DENIED .Defendantsdonothavethesuftk ientinfonnationtofonnulateananswerto

paragraph 97;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph97isDENIED .

98.DENIED .Defendantsdonothavethesuftk ientinform ationtofonnulateananswerto

paragraph 98;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph98isDENIED.

99.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufticientinform ationtofonnulateananswerto

paragraph 99;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph99isDENIED.

IOO.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationtoform ulateananswerto

pragraph 100;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 100 isDENIED.

101.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesuftk ientinform ationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph 101;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 101isDEN IED.

102.DENIED .Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinform ation toform ulatean answerto

paragraph 102;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 102isDEN IED.

Case 1:20-cv-23159-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2020 Page 10 of 19
103.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesuffcientinformationtoformulatean answerto

paragraph 103;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 103isDEN IED.

CO UNT Vl

104.Defendantsherebyincom oratetheaboveparagraphsbyreferenceasiffullysetforth

hereinatlength.

105.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph 105;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 105isDENIED.

IO6.DENIED .Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph 106;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 106isDENIED.

107.DEN IED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationtoform ulatean answerto

paragraph l07;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 107isDENIED.

108.DEN IED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationto form ulatean answerto

paragraph 108;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 108isDEN IED.

IO9.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesuftk ientinfonnationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph 109;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 109isDEN IED.

1IO.DEN IED.Defendantsdonothavethesuffk ientinform ationtoform ulatean answerto

paragraph 1l0;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 110isDENIED.

11I.DEN IED.Defendantsdonothavethesufticientinform ationto fom mlatean answerto

paragraph 111;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 111isDEN IED.

1IZ.DEN IED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph 112;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparar aph 112isDENIED.

COUNT VlI

113.Defendantsherebyincorporatetheaboveparagraphsbyreferenceasiffullysetforth

hereinatlength.

114.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtoform ulatean answerto

paragraph 114.,thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 114isDENIED.

Case 1:20-cv-23159-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2020 Page 11 of 19
1IS.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtoform ulatean answerto

paragraph 115;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 115isDENIED.

116.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph 116;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 116isDENIED.

117.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph 117;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 117isDEN IED.

COUNT VIIl

1l8.Defendantsherebyincorporatetheaboveparagraphsbyreferenceasiffullysetforth

hereinatlength.

119.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinform ationtoform ulatean answerto

paragraph 119;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 119isDEN IED.

IZO.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinform ationto form ulatean answerto

paragraph 120;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 120isDEN IED.

121.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph 121)thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 121isDENIED.

122.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnation toform ulateananswerto

paragraph 122;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 122 isDENIED.

123.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufticientinform ationtofonnulatean answerto

paragraph 123;thereforetheD efendantsresponsetoparagraph 123isDEN IED.

COUNT IX

124.Defendantsherebyincom oratetheaboveparagraphsbyreferenceasiffullysetforth

hereinatlength.

125.DEN IED.Defendantsdonothavethesuftk ientinform ationto fonnulatean answerto

paragraph 125;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 125isDENIED.

126.DEN IED.Defendantsdonothavethesuftk ientinform ationto fonnulateananswerto

paragraph 126;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 126isDEN IED.

Case 1:20-cv-23159-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2020 Page 12 of 19
127.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesuffcientinfonnationtoform ulateananswerto

paragraph 127)thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 127isDENIED .

128.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationto form ulateananswerto

paragraph 128;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 128 isDENIED .

129.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtofonnulateananswerto

paragraph 129;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 129isDENIED .

130.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinformationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph 130;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 130 isDENIED.

131.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph 131;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 131isDENIED.

132.DENIED.Defendantsdonothavethesufficientinfonnationtoformulateananswerto

paragraph 132;thereforetheDefendantsresponsetoparagraph 132 isDENIED.

NEW M ATTER

133.Anyanda11claim sand/orcrossclaim sarebaredbylaches.

134.Anyanda1lclaim sand/orcrossclaim sarebarredbythestatuteoflim itations.

135.Anyanda11claim sand/orcrossclaim sarebarredbyviacom parativenegligenceact

and/orcontributorynegligence.

136.Anyanda1lclaim sand/orcrossclaim sarebarredbynovation.

137.AnsweringDefendantowednodutytothePlaintiff.

138.AnsweringDefendantbreachednodutytothePlaintiff.

139.Anyandallclaim sand/orcrossclaimsarebarredby accord andsatisfaction.

140.ThePlaintiffand/orCo-Defendanthavefailedtonegotiateingoodfaithand/ormitigate

dam ages.

141.Anyand alldamagesallegedlysustainedbythePlaintiffweretheresultofactionsof

third-partiesoverwhom theansweringDefendanthad nocontrol.

142.Plaintiffisbarredfrom assertingtheinstantactionsbecauseofthedoctrineofRes

Judicataorequitableestoppel.

Case 1:20-cv-23159-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2020 Page 13 of 19
AFFIRM ATIVE DEFENSES

HavingansweredtheComplaint,theDefendants,LarryAlloucheandAdelLLC,ProSe,files

andassertsthefollowingenumeratedAffirm ativeDefenses.

1.FIRST AFFIRM ATIVE DEFENSE

AstheFirstAffinnativeDefensetheDefendantsassertaFailuretoStateaCauseof

Actionuponwhichreliefcan begranted,asthePlaintiffhasfailedto sufficientlypleadabasis

upon whichreliefcanbegranted.ThePlaintifffailstoallegewithspeciticity anyfactual

allegationstoestablishtherequisiteelements.ThePlaintifffailstosetforthultimatefactsto

show thatthePlaintiffisentitledtorelief.

ll.SECOND AFFIRM ATIVE DEFENSE

A stheSecondAffirmativeDefense,theDefendants,assertUncleanHands.Theactions

ofthePlaintiffshouldbarrecoveryinthisaction.ThePlaintiffswrongfulconductprecludesit

from seekingreliefandtheclaim shouldbedism issed.

111.SELECTIVE ENFORCEM ENT

AstheThirdAffirmativeDefensetheDefendantsassertSelectiveEnforcementofthe

CovenantsandDocum entsbythePlaintiff.ThePlaintiffsselectiveenforcem entofthe

CovenantsandDocum entswithinthecomm unityisacom pletebartotheenforcementofthe

CovenantsandDocum entsagainsttheDefendants.

IV.FO URTH AFFIRM ATIVE TIVE DEFENSE

AstheFourthAftirm ativeDefense,theDefendantsassertsthatPlaintiffsdam ageswere

caused,inwholeorinpart,asaresultofPlaintiffsownnegligence,therefore,Plaintiffs

recovery,ifany,shouldbeproportionallydiminishedbytheDoctrineofCom parative

Negligence.

V.FIFTH AFFIRM ATIVE DEFENSE

AstheFifthAffinnativeDefense,theDefendantsassertsthatthePlaintifffailedto

mitigateanydam agesallegedly sustained.Assuch,anydamagesactuallysustained bythe

Plaintiffshouldbereducedproportionallyforthefailttretomitigatesuchlosses.

VI.SIXTH AFFIRM ATIVE DEFENSE

AstheSixthAftirmativeDefense,theDefendantsstatethattheallegedinjuriestothe

Plaintiffwerecausedinwholeorinpartbythenegligenceofthirdpartiesoverwhom the

Defendanthadnocontrol.ThePlaintiffsclaim sagainsttheDefendantsmustthereforebe

reducedinproportiontothenegligenceofthirdparties.

VII.SEVENTH AFFIRM ATIVE DEFENSE

Case 1:20-cv-23159-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2020 Page 14 of 19
AstheSeventhAftirmativeDefense,theDefendantsassertthatwhiletheDetendants

denythatthePlaintiffisentitledtoanyrecoverywhatsoever,totheextentthatthePlaintiffs

allegeddam agesarecaused inwholeorinpartbythirdpartieswhoarenotpartiestothisaction,

liabilityshallbeapportionedaccordingtofault,irrespectiveofwhethersuchthirdpartiesbecome

partiestothisaction

VlII.EIG HTH AFFIRM ATIVE DEFENSE

AstheEighthAffirm ativeDefense,theDefendantsassertthatany dnmagesallegedbythe

Plaintiffweretheresultofinterveningorsupersedingevents,factors,occurrencesorconditions,

whichwereinnowaycausedorcontributedtobytheDefendants,therefore,theDefendantsare

notliablehencedefeatingPlaintiffsclaim .

IX NINTH AFFIRM ATIVE TIVE DEFENSE

AstheNinthAffirmativeDefense,theDefendantsstatethattheallegedinjuriestothe

Plaintiffwerecausedinwholeorinpat'tbythenegligenceofthirdpartiesoverwhom the

Defendantshadnocontrol.ThePlaintiffsclaim sagainsttheDefendantsm ustthereforebe

reducedinproportiontothenegligenceofthirdparties.

X TENTH AFFIRM ATIVE DEFENSE

AstheTenthAffirmativeDefense,theDefendantsassertEstoppelandstatethatthe

Plaintiffisbarred,inwholeorinpart,from recoverytotheextentthatitoritsagentsorreal

partiesininteresthavemadestatementsortakenactionswhichestopthem from assertingthe

claims

XI.ELEVENTH AFFIRM ATIVE DEFENSE

AstheEleventhaffinnativedefense,theDefendantsassertthatthePlaintiffsclaim sare

fraudulent,inthatPlaintiffdeliberatelyfailedto fullyandfaithfullyperform itsduties,tothe

detrimentoftheDefendants,and isthereforenotentitledtoanyofthereliefordnm agessought

in

itscomplaint.

X1I.TW ELFTH AFFIRM ATIVE DEFENSE

Asthetwelhh affirm ativedefense,theDefendantsassertillegalityasthePlaintiffsclaim s

arebared,inwholeorinpart,bythedoctrineofillegalityinthatthecontractfonningthebasis

ofPlaintiffscausesofactionviolatesthe1aw oftheStateofFlorida,assetforthinthe

Defendant'scounterclaims.Plaintiffs'claimsarefurtherbarredbyillegalityarisingfrom

Plaintiffsfailuretocomplywithrulesandregulationsprom ulgatedbytheStateofFlorida.

XIll.THIRTEENTH AFFIRM ATIVE DEFENSE

Asthethirteenthaftinnativedefense,theDefendantsassertPaym ent.Before

comm encementofthisaction,Defendantsdischargedplaintiffsclaim ,andeachitem ofit,by

paymentofthem onthlyassessm ents.

M V FOURTEENTH AFFIRM ATIVE DEFENSE

AstheFourteenthaftirm ativedefense,theDefendantsassertthatthePlaintiffsclaim s

mustfailasthePlaintiffailedtocomplywithRule1.130(a)oftheFloridaRulesofCivil

Case 1:20-cv-23159-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2020 Page 15 of 19
Proctdurewhich statesinpertinentpart,''Al1bonds,notes,billsofexchange,contracts,accounts,

ordocumentsupon whichaction maybebroughtordefensem ade,oracopythereoforacopyof

theportionsthereofm aterialtothepleadings,shallbeincorporatedinorattachedtothe

Pleading.''

XV .FIFTEENTH AFFIRM ATIVE DEFENSE

AstheFiheenthaffinnativedefense,theDefendantassertsthatPlaintiffsdam ages,if

any,werecaused,inwholeorinparqasaresultofPlaintiffsownnegligenceand/oradions,

therefore,thePlaintiffsrecovery,ifany,shouldbeproportionallydiminished.

RESERVATION O F RIGHT TO SUPPLEM ENT DEFENSES

Thefactshavingnotbeenfullydeveloped,Defendantsaffirmativelypleadanyofthe

followingdefensesthatm aybecom eapplicabletothisaction:accordandsatisfaction,arbitration

andaward,assumptionofrisk,coercion.contract,contributorynegligence,dischargein

bankruptcy,duress,econom icduress,electionofremedies,estoppel,failtlreofconsideration,

ilegality,injurybyfelow servant,laches,license,payment,release,resjudicata,satisfaction,

statuteoffrauds,waiver,thefailureofplaintifftom itigatedam agesortakereasonablestepsto

avoiddamages,thefailureofplaintifftoexerciseordinarycare,andanyotherm atterconstituting

anavoidanceoraffirmativedefense.

TheDefendants,reservetherighttosupplem entthisAnswerwithany additional

AffinuativeDefensestheym ayassert.

oate- *V-5u-zdt:

# 3.

.'' K

Case 1:20-cv-23159-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2020 Page 16 of 19
VERIFICATION

Iverifythatthestatem entsmadein thiscom plaintaretrueandcorrect.Iunderstandthatfalse

Statementshereinaremadesubjecttothepenaltiesof28U.S.C.j1746relatingto

unswornfalsificationtoauthorities.

oate A JJ-ço-eolcg

Case 1:20-cv-23159-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2020 Page 17 of 19
*

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE

thd fNovem ber IherebycertifythatIhavethis30 ayo , 2020Iservedacopyofthe

foregoingdocumentuponthepersoninthemnnnerindicatedbelow :

FedExExpressDelivery

THE BERN STEIN LAW FIRM

M ichael1.Bernstein

Jordan C.K aplan

3050BiscayneBoulevard,Suite403

M iam i,Florida33137

DateA vp'-5a'-zplo

Case 1:20-cv-23159-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2020 Page 18 of 19
.< ...

2....w......-' x'w... ...... .

.w . =. ,

'

.

.

.

,j AlkntnpnfFedExëxpfess*shippingIabelhera. 'è

821.1sjjjjjjj (s7o)a4l-1:1c jjjrsjkrj:ajojkvzû l c

e cAD:sgaaisazssFoalal z

ea1IBETHsr y (

22%5Iï2l)%s B'L:-CRED'TCARD - l!

10 U$DISTRICTZOURTCLEBK #

USDISTRICTCOURT 0!:,

4û2N MIAMlA7E al/,

MIAMIFL3212:

jjj)803-34% REF, p-Q- t. . - .. . ..- . 7-i:P!.l .

Il11111111111111lIlI1lIlIl111Ilj11IlIl

1 l s 4i FndEx

11 ) EX;r***

1 ! k 1 )' d 1 G7.

'

,j i '1

ï!ikd- ', .iI? Ijqt,

f ,4-

TLE-212E212:3211

rll--rtn229622162i61 Fhlû8lTtC/EFyICFT

XH M PBA ,.--33121)'

1 -.

Case 1:20-cv-23159-AMC Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2020 Page 19 of 19