alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 96-156 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, October 30, 1996)

NRC'S ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE

TO MEET NOVEMBER 12 AND 13 IN ROCKVILLE, MD

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Advisory Committee on

Nuclear Waste has scheduled a technical meeting November 12 and

13, in Rockville, Maryland, to discuss progress at the Yucca

Mountain high-level waste disposal site in Nevada.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will begin at 8:30

a.m. in Room 2-B3, at Two White Flint North, 11545 Rockville

Pike, and run until 6:00 p.m. The November 13 session will begin

at 8:30 a.m. and run until 4:00 p.m.

The meeting will include a discussion with the Director of

the NRC's Division of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear

Materials Safety and Safeguards on progress at the Yucca Mountain

high-level waste disposal site. Other aspects of the meeting,

including the opportunity for public comment, are described in a

Notice of Meeting published in the December 6, 1995, edition of

the Federal Register.

#
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Miami Division

Case No. 1:20-cv-23402-JEM

PINNACLE THREE CORPORATION, and

LEON GOLDSTEIN, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

OLEG FIRER, IGOR “GARY” GELMAN, and 

STAR EQUITIES, LLC

Defendants.

_________________________________________

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Pursuant to the Court’s Order ECF No. 21 and to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedures, Plaintiffs Pinnacle Three Corporation and Leon Goldstein state that Pinnacle Three 

Corporation has no parent corporation and/or any publicly held corporation owning 10% of more 

of its stock. Additionally, a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships or 

corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including ALL subsidiaries, 

conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party:

Name Reason

Leon Goldstein 100% owner of Pinnacle Three Corporation

Sergiu Gherman / Gherman Legal Pllc Attorney for Leon Goldstein and Pinnacle 

Three Corporation

Paul Aiello / Bennett Aiello Attorney for Leon Goldstein and Pinnacle 

Three Corporation

Dated April 29, 2021.

Respectfully submitted,

Case 1:20-cv-23402-JEM Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/29/2021 Page 1 of 2
Co-Counsel for the Plaintiffs

GHERMAN LEGAL PLLC

777 Brickell Ave Ste 500

Miami, Florida 33131-2803

Tel/Fax (305) 889-7890

sgherman@ghermanlaw.com 

By: /s Sergiu Gherman

Sergiu Gherman, FBN 37031

Co-Counsel for the Plaintiffs

BENNETT & AIELLO

Temporary Address for Mail

3471 Main Highway, Suite 206

Coconut Grove, Florida 33133-5929

Phone: (305) 358-9011

paiello@bennettaiello.com

By: /s Paul Aiello

Paul Aiello, FBN 0909033

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on April 29, 2021 the foregoing document is being served this 

day on all counsel or pro se parties identified below in the manner specified, either via transmission 

of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those 

counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notice of Electronic Filing.

Via e-mail: 

Steven D. Weber

Fla. Bar. No.: 47543

steve@starkweber.com

STARK WEBER PLLC

1221 Brickell Avenue

Suite 900

Miami, FL 33131

Tel: (305) 377-8788

Attorney for Defendants

Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Sergiu Gherman .

Sergiu Gherman, Bar No. 37031

sgherman@ghermanlaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Case 1:20-cv-23402-JEM Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/29/2021 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Annual Report of Summit Brokerage Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Mark F. Caulfield, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                         /s/ Mark Caulfield
                                         --------------------------------
                                               Mark Caulfield
                                               Chief Financial Officer
                                               March 31, 2003
### §1907a. Authority to transfer amounts between salaries and general expenses

During fiscal year 2014 and any succeeding fiscal year, the Capitol Police may transfer amounts appropriated for the fiscal year between the category for salaries and the category for general expenses, upon the approval of the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and Senate.

(Pub. L. 113–76, div. I, title I, §1001, Jan. 17, 2014, 128 Stat. 424.)
### §12. Repealed. Oct. 25, 1951, ch. 562, §1(16), 65 Stat. 638

Section, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 961, 60 Stat. 1057, related to preservation of technical and economic records of domestic sources of ores of metals and minerals. See sections 2103, 2908, and 3102 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.
###### Editorial Note on Part 134

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93018, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 134.36 Inapplicability of marking exception for articles processed by importer.

An article which is to be processed in the United States by the importer or for his account shall not be considered to be within the specifications of section 304(a)(3)(G), of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304(a)(3)(G)), if there is a reasonable method of marking which will not be obliterated, destroyed, or permanently concealed by such processing.

[T.D. 72-262, 37 FR 20318, Sept. 29, 1972, as amended by T.D. 97-72, 62 FR 44214, Aug. 20, 1997]
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

34 36 38 40 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/19 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23796]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employee Benefits Security Administration


Working Group on Health and Welfare Form 5500 Requirements, 
Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans, Notice 
of Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, a 
public meeting will be held on Tuesday, November 9, 2004, of the 
Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans Working 
Group assigned to study health and welfare Form 5500 requirements. The 
working group is studying the Form 5500 requirements for health and 
welfare plans to assess the benefits of this reporting tool for these 
plans.
    The session will take place in Room N-3437 A-C, U.S. Department of 
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. The purpose 
of the open meeting, which will run from 1:30 p.m. to approximately 4 
p.m., is for Working Group members to conclude their report/
recommendations for the Secretary of Labor.
    Organizations or members of the public wishing to submit a written 
statement pertaining to the topic may do so by submitting 20 copies to 
Larry Good, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory Council, U.S. 
Department of Labor, Room N-5656, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20210. Statements received on or before November 2, 2004 
will be included in the record of the meeting. Individuals or 
representatives of organizations wishing to address the Working Group 
should forward their request to the Executive Secretary at the above 
address or via telephone at (202) 693-8668. Oral presentations will be 
limited to 20 minutes, but an extended statement may be submitted for 
the record. Individuals with disabilities who need special 
accommodations should contact Larry Good by November 2 at the address 
indicated in this notice.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 19th day of October, 2004.
Ann L. Combs,
Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-23796 Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: AMBER HOTEL CORPORATION,

Debtor,

______________________________

JAMES J. LITTLE,

Appellant,

 v.

AMBER HOTEL CORPORATION,

Appellee.

No. 14-56320

D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00951-FMO

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Fernando M. Olguin, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 5, 2016

Pasadena, California

Before: PREGERSON, NOONAN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

FILED

NOV 08 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
James Little appeals the district court’s ruling that his appeal of the

bankruptcy court’s approval of Amber Hotel’s reorganization plan is equitably

moot. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 158(d), 1291, and we affirm. 

1. “In evaluating a dismissal on equitable mootness grounds, we review factual

findings for clear error and legal conclusions de novo.” In re Transwest Resort

Properties, Inc., 801 F.3d 1161, 1168 (9th Cir. 2015) (citing In re Mortgages Ltd.,

771 F.3d 1211, 1214 (9th Cir. 2014)).

2. We have identified four factors to determine whether a bankruptcy case is

equitably moot. Id. at 1168-73. First, whether a stay was sought. Id. at 1168. 

Second, whether substantial consummation of the plan occurred. Id. at 1168-69. 

Third, what effect a remedy may have on third parties not before the court. Id. at

1169-71. Finally, whether the bankruptcy court can fashion relief that would not

completely unwind the plan. Id. at 1171-73.

Little failed to seek a stay. Furthermore, the reorganization plan has been

fully consummated. As a result, unwinding the plan would affect third parties not

before the court and the bankruptcy court cannot fashion relief without completely

unwinding the plan. All factors point in favor of the district court’s determination

that Little’s appeal is equitably moot. 

AFFIRMED.

2
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.61 Withdrawal permit.

Upon the filing of the withdrawal and the execution of the bond, when required, the port director shall issue a permit on CBP Form 7501 or in-bond application.

[CBP Dec. 17-13, 82 FR 45394, Sept. 28, 2017]
Exhibit 23


                   Consent of Independent Public Accountants


     We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference to the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of Union Community  Bancorp (the  "Company"),  File Number
000-23543,  of our report dated January 26, 2004 on the  consolidated  financial
statements  of the Company  which  report is  incorporated  by  reference in the
Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 filed
pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.



/s/ BKD, LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
March 29, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

                     CHASE MANHATTAN AUTO OWNER TRUST 2001-A
                           ANNUAL ISSUER'S CERTIFICATE
                                       of
                            COMPLIANCE WITH INDENTURE

         The undersigned certifies that she is an Authorized Officer of
Wilmington Trust Company, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Owner
Trustee for Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 2001-A and that she is duly
authorized to execute and deliver this certificate on behalf of the Issuer in
connection with Section 3.9 of the Indenture between the Issuer and Wells Fargo
Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, dated as of July 1,
2001 (the "Indenture"). All capitalized terms used herein without definition
shall have the respective meanings specified in the Indenture.

         The undersigned further certifies that a review of the activities of
the Issuer for the preceding calendar year has been made under her supervision
and, to the best of her knowledge, based on such review, the Issuer has complied
with all conditions and convenants in all material respects under the Indenture
throughout the preceding calendar year.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereto my signature as of this 25th
day of March, 2003.

                     CHASE MANHATTAN AUTO OWNER TRUST 2001-A
                     BY: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its individual
                     capacity, but solely as Owner Trustee


                     /s/ Mary Kay Pupillo
                     ---------------------------------------
                     Name: Mary Kay Pupillo
                     Title: Senior Financial Services Officer

         Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, as Servicer, hereby
requests that Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee, execute the above
Issuer's Certificate and deliver it to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National
Association, as Indenture Trustee.


                      CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA,
                      NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer

                      /s/ Richard J. Naeder
                      ------------------------------------------
                      Richard J. Naeder
                      Authorized Signatory
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Eyeris Rodriguez and others, 

Plaintiff,

v.

Supersonic of Florida, Inc. and 

others, Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 20-23459-Civ-Scola

Order Adopting the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendations

This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Edwin G. 

Torres for a report and recommendation on the Plaintiffs’ motions for attorney’s 

fees. On February 26, 2021, Judge Torres issued a report, recommending that 

the Court grant the motion, in part, and award the Plaintiffs’ attorney’s fees in 

the amount of $9,080.00. (Report & Recommendations, ECF No. 38.) No 

objections have been filed and the time to object has passed. Having considered 

Judge Torres’s report, the record, and the relevant legal authorities, this Court 

finds Judge Torres’s report and recommendation cogent and compelling.

The Court affirms and adopts Judge Torres’s report and 

recommendation (ECF No. 38). The Court grants in part the Plaintiffs’ motion 

for attorney’s fees (ECF No. 34). Consistent with the report, the Court awards 

$9,080.00 in attorneys’ fees to the Plaintiffs to be paid by the Defendants.

Done and ordered at Miami, Florida, on March 15, 2021.

_______________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-23459-RNS Document 39 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/15/2021 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 174
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 174 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93025, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 174.22 Accelerated disposition of protest. ( a ) *Request for accelerated disposition.* Accelerated disposition of a protest filed in accordance with section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1514) may be obtained at any time after 90 days from the filing of such protest for entries made before December 18, 2004, or at any time concurrent with or following the filing of the protest for entries made on or after December 18, 2004, by filing by registered or certified mail a written request for accelerated disposition with the port director, Center director, or other CBP officer with whom the protest was filed.
( b ) *Contents of request.* A request for accelerated disposition of protest shall contain the following information: ( 1 ) The name, address, and importer number of the protestant, *i.e.*, the importer of record or consignee, and the name and address of his agent or attorney if filed by one of these; and
( 2 ) The date of filing and number of the protest for which accelerated disposition is requested.
( c ) *Review following request.* The Center director shall review the protest which is the subject of the request within 30 days from the date of mailing of a request for accelerated disposition filed in accordance with the provisions of this section, and may allow or deny the protest in whole or in part.
( d ) *Failure to allow or deny protest within 30-day period.* If the Center director fails to allow or deny a protest which is the subject of a request for accelerated disposition within 30 days from the date of mailing of such request, the protest shall be deemed to have been denied at the close of the 30th day following such date of mailing.
( e ) *Multiple protests.* If several protests by different persons are timely filed and treated as part of a single protest pursuant to § 174.15, a request for accelerated disposition filed by any one of the protesting parties shall be treated as a request for accelerated disposition by all the parties.
[T.D. 70-181, 35 FR 13429, Aug. 22, 1970, as amended by CBP Dec. 11-02, 76 FR 2578, Jan. 14, 2011]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle, IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. III-01-049 November 6, 2001

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $3,000 FINE AGAINST PALMERTON & PARRISH, INC. OF

MISSOURI FOR FAILING TO CONTROL LICENSED MATERIAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $3,000 fine against Palmerton &

Parrish, Inc., of Springfield, Missouri, for violating NRC requirements associated with the loss of a

portable moisture density gauge containing two sealed radioactive sources. 

 The gauge, which is used to measure soil conditions at road and building sites, was later

recovered. The gauge was not damaged in the incident and consequently there was no immediate

health or safety concern. 

 On July 31, the company notified the NRC that a portable moisture density gauge had been left

unattended on the bed of an open-bed pickup truck and was not checked when the driver proceeded to

a second job site. Consequently, the gauge had fallen from the truck and was lost along a highway. A

member of the public subsequently found the gauge and returned it to the company.

 The gauge contained 8 millicuries of cesium-137 and 40 millicuries of americium-241 in two

sealed sources and was being used at a temporary job site in Green County, Missouri.

The NRC staff identified four violations involving the incident including: failure to maintain

control of radioactive material that is in an unrestricted area and that is not in storage; failure to

transport the gauge in its proper container; failure to brace the gauge during transportation; and failure

to lock the gauge while being transported.

In notifying the company of the proposed fine, NRC Regional Administrator James E. Dyer

noted that Palmerton & Parrish had taken corrective actions to prevent a reoccurrence of the situation,

including additional training for employees. However, he said, a newly adopted enforcement policy

provides that a fine be proposed to reflect the significance of the violation and emphasize the

importance of maintaining control of licensed material. The specified fines included in the

enforcement policy were developed to correspond to roughly three times the cost of proper disposal.

Palmerton & Parrish has 30 days to pay the fine or protest it. If the fine is protested and

subsequently imposed by the NRC staff, the company may request a hearing.

# # #
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-02-046 November 5, 2002

CONTACT: Roger Hannah E-mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS INSPECTION

OF FORT CALHOUN PLANT’S LICENSE RENEWAL PROGRAMS

Officials of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with Omaha Public Power

District management at 9:00 a.m. (CST) Friday, November 8, at the plant’s Training Auditorium,

located on Highway 75 north of Fort Calhoun, Nebraska, to present the results of the NRC’s first

region-based inspection of the license renewal programs for the Fort Calhoun nuclear plant. 

The meeting is between the NRC and Omaha Public Power District but is open to observation

by interested members of the public. NRC officials will also be available prior to its conclusion to

answer any questions observers may have.

Omaha Public Power District filed an application to renew the operating license of the Fort

Calhoun plant in January 2002. If the NRC approves the plant’s application, it would renew the

license for an additional 20 years, moving the license expiration date from 2013 to 2033. 

###
### §1015. Requirement for lessees

Leases under this chapter may be issued only to citizens of the United States, associations of such citizens, corporations organized under the laws of the United States or of any State or the District of Columbia, or governmental units, including, without limitation, municipalities.

(Pub. L. 91–581, §16, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1571; Pub. L. 109–58, title II, §236(16), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 672.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2005—Pub. L. 109–58 inserted section catchline.