alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-02-0196 - Recommendations Stemming From The Systematic Assessment of Exemptions From Licensing in 10 CFR Parts 30 and 40; and a Rulemaking Plan For Risk-Informing 10 CFR Parts 30, 31, and 32

Accession Number: ML021650518

Date Released: Friday, October 31, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML021650464 - SECY-02-0196 - Recommendations Stemming from the Systematic Assessment of Exemptions from Licensing in Parts 30 and 40; and a Rulemaking Plan for Risk-Informing Parts 30, 31, and 32 (12 page(s), 11/1/2002)
    - ML003713268 - US AEC Federal Register 30 CFR 3482  Use of Byproduct Material & Source Material - Products Intended for Use by General Public (Consumer Products). (1 page(s), 3/16/1965)
    - ML021650478 - SECY-02-0196-Attachment 2-Tables of Exemptions from Licensing (2 page(s), 11/1/2002)
    - ML021650484 - SECY-02-0196-Attachment 3-Tabulation of Requirements for Byproduct Material Exemptions (3 page(s), 11/1/2002)
    - ML021650489 - SECY-02-0196-Attachment 4-Tabulation of Requirements for Source Material Exemptions (3 page(s), 11/1/2002)
    - ML021650496 - SECY-02-0196-Attachment 5-Basis For Staff's Reevaluation of the Adequacy of Exemptions (3 page(s), 11/1/2002)
    - ML021650500 - SECY-02-0196-Attachment 6-Issues Identified in Reevaluation of Exemptions and in SECY-97-291 (17 page(s), 11/1/2002)
    - ML021650509 - SECY-02-0196-Attachment 7-Rulemaking Plan:  10 CFR Parts 30, 31, and 32 (15 page(s), 11/1/2002)
    - ML022730127 - SECY-02-0196-Attachment 8-Agreement State Comments on Draft Rule Plan (2 page(s), 11/1/2002)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,197
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,951
<ALLOWANCES>                                       737
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,394
<PP&E>                                         126,377
<DEPRECIATION>                                  69,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 162,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,381
<BONDS>                                         17,141
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           758
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,495
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   162,861
<SALES>                                        235,479
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               235,479
<CGS>                                          205,705
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  243,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,285
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (281)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,741
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,675)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,325
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.14)


</TABLE>
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-095 July 31, 2001

NRC APPROVES POWER UPRATE

FOR HOPE CREEK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT IN NEW JERSEY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a request by Public Service Electric & Gas

Company to increase the generating capacity of the Hope Creek nuclear power plant by 1.4 percent, or

about 15 megawatts of electricity. 

The power uprate at Hope Creek, located in Hancocks Bridge, N.J., will increase the generating

capacity of the plant to about 1133 megawatts of electricity. The facility intends to implement the

power increase by the end of September. The application for the increase in power was submitted to the

NRC in December.

The NRC's safety evaluation of the requested power uprate for the plant focused on several

areas, including nuclear steam supply systems, instrumentation and control systems, electrical systems,

accident evaluations, radiological consequences, operations and technical specification changes. The

NRC staff determined that the licensee could safely increase the power output of the reactor with minor

modifications to plant equipment and because of technical refinements that permit more precise

measurements of reactor operating conditions.

###
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.192 Claim for exemption from duty under the CBI.

A claim for an exemption from duty on the ground that the CBI applies shall be allowed by the Center director only if he is satisfied that the requirements set forth in this section and §§ 10.193 through 10.198b have been met. Duty-free treatment may be claimed at the time of filing the entry summary by placing the symbol “E” as a prefix to the HTSUS subheading number for each article for which such treatment is claimed on that document.

[T.D. 84-237, 49 FR 47993, Dec. 7, 1984, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51252, Dec. 21, 1988; T.D. 94-47, 59 FR 25570, May 17, 1994; T.D. 00-68, 65 FR 59658, Oct. 5, 2000]
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Distribución y Servicio D&S S.A (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2006 (the Report), Miguel Núñez Sfeir, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,

|(1) | The Report   fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the   Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                         
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                         |        | /s/ Miguel   Núñez Sfeir 
|------------------------ | ------ | -------------------------
|                         |        |                          
|                         | By:    | Miguel Núñez   Sfeir     
|                         | Title: | Chief   Financial Officer
|Date:   October 20, 2006 |        |                          

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      16,033,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     190,559,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             4,900,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                107,585,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     145,092,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       145,281,000
<LOANS>                                    160,146,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                 (2,715,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             339,860,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 269,973,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                38,600,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,595,000
<LONG-TERM>                                 10,304,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,674,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,714,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             339,860,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,051,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,895,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               227,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            11,173,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,773,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,392,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,781,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   47,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             266,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              6,848,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                825,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     825,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   591,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.84
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,678,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   10,000
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,715,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,715,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
EX-10.16






 Exhibit 10.16 

Amendment to Employment Agreement 

THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made this      day of March, 2020, by and between Aveanna Healthcare
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), and David Afshar (“Executive”). 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to an Employment Agreement dated February 6, 2018 (the “Employment
Agreement”); capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Employment Agreement; 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement in certain respects, in accordance with the terms and
conditions set forth herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants and promises in this
Amendment, the parties agree as follows: 
 1.    The second sentence of Section 4(a)(i) of
the Agreement is hereby amended to provide that Executive’s Base Salary shall be increased to Four Hundred Thousand Dollars ($400,000) per year, effective as of January 1, 2020. 

2.    The first sentence of Section 4(b) of the Agreement is hereby amended to replace
“fifty percent (50%)” with “seventy-five percent (75%)”. 
 3.    Except as amended hereby,
the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 













 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment to Employment
Agreement as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	AVEANNA HEALTHCARE LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ H. Anthony Strange

		 	H. Anthony Strange
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	 /s/ David Afshar

	David Afshar
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-0735

_____________________________

ERNIE MORRIS ENTERPRISES,

INC.,

Appellant,

v.

CONTRAX FURNISHINGS, LLC,

METEOR EDUCATION, LLC, and

GREG S. CAVE, an individual,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Monica J. Brasington, Judge.

June 21, 2019

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

J. Robert McCormack of Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & 

Stewart, P.C., Tampa, for Appellant.

No appearance for Appellees.
## Breadcrumb

      -  Home 
      -  Guidance 
      -  Key Reference Materials 

##                 Guidance              

### National Labor Relations Board

Sign out

View Your Dashboard

### National Labor Relations Board

Sign in with Login.gov

## Most Popular Pages

-  Who We Are 
-  National Labor Relations Act 
-  Cases & Decisions 
-  Recent Charges & Petitions Filings 
-  The Law 
-  The Right to Strike 
-  Case Search 
-  Contact Us 
-  Frequently Asked Questions 

# Manuals

Our manuals are written for legal and non-legal audiences and provide a wealth of material useful for understanding and navigating NLRB cases.

Hard copies for many of the following manuals may be ordered through the Government Printing Office.

 

NLRB Casehandling Manual, Part 1, Unfair Labor Practice Proceedings (June 2024)

NLRB Casehandling Manual, Part 2, Representation Proceedings (December 2023)

NLRB Casehandling Manual, Part 3, Compliance Proceedings (October 2020)

National Academy of Arbitrators SEW Binder (October 2015)

Outline of Law and Procedure in Representation Cases (June 2017)

Outline of Law and Procedure in Representation Cases 2017 supplement

Outline of Law and Procedure in Representation Cases 2018 supplement

Outline of Law and Procedure in Representation Cases 2019 supplement

Outline of Law and Procedure in Representation Cases 2020 supplement

Outline of Law and Procedure in Representation Cases 2021 supplement

Outline of Law and Procedure in Representation Cases 2022 supplement

Outline of Law and Procedure in Representation Cases 2023 supplement

NLRB Guide for Hearing Officers

NLRB ALJ Bench Book 2024

Guide to Board Procedures

NLRB Style Manual (January 2000)

NLRB FOIA Manual
#### Charles C. DOUGLASS, Jr., M.D., individually and acting as next friend for Crellin Derrick Douglas; Crellin Derrick Douglass, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; et al., Defendants.

No. 01-16031.

D.C. No. CV-99-05307-SI.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 28, 2002.

*662Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS, and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Douglass’ motion for oral argument is denied.

MEMORANDUM **

Charles C. Douglass, Jr., M.D., appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his motion to vacate the underlying judgment dismissing his action for failure to serve defendants. We grant Crellin Derrick Douglass’ request for joinder. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, *Harman v. Harper,*7 F.3d 1455, 1458 (9th Cir.1993), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. *See Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc.,*5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir.1993). We do not consider the non-jurisdictional contentions regarding the underlying judgment. *See Crateo, Inc. v. Intermark, Inc.,*536 F.2d 862, 870 n. 15 (9th Cir.1976).

We have carefully reviewed the remaining contentions and motions, and conclude that they are unpersuasive. All remaining motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7471

KEVIN DEVON HOGUE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District

Judge. (CA-05-374-2)

Submitted: February 16, 2006 Decided: February 22, 2006

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Devon Hogue, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Devon Hogue seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). The district court denied the petition on the grounds that

it was successive. The order is not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is

debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the

district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hogue

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability, deny his motion to proceed in forma

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

                              TERMINATION AGREEMENT

         THIS TERMINATION AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this ____ day of
January, 2003 ("Termination Date"), by and between Insurance Management
Solutions, Inc. ("IMS"), Bankers Insurance Group, Inc. ("BIG") and First
Community Insurance Company ("FCIC").

         WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into that certain Technical Support
Services Agreement ("Technical Support Agreement"), dated April 1, 1999; and

         WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to terminate the Technical Support
Agreement as to all parties, with no remaining liability as of the Termination
Date;

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements
hereinafter set forth, as well as for other good and valuable consideration, the
parties hereto do covenant and agree as follows:

         1.       Pursuant to Section 1 C. of the Technical Support Agreement,
                  the parties hereto do mutually agree to terminate the
                  Technical Support Agreement as to all parties as of the
                  Termination Date.

         2.       All parties shall have no further liability to each other
                  under the Technical Support Agreement as of the Termination
                  Date.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be
duly executed by their corporate officers as of the day and year first above
written.

Witness:                                  INSURANCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, INC.


  s/s Nancy C. Haire                      BY: s/s David M. Howard
------------------------                     ----------------------------------

                                          AS ITS:  President & CEO
                                                   ----------------------------


Witness:                                  FIRST COMMUNITY INSURANCE COMPANY


  s/s Nancy C. Haire                            BY: s/s Robert G. Southey
------------------------                            ---------------------------

                                                Robert G. Southey, Secretary


Witness:                                  BANKERS INSURANCE GROUP, INC.


  s/s  Nancy C. Haire                           BY:  s/s Robert G. Southey
------------------------                            ---------------------------

                                                Robert G. Southey, Secretary
###### Editorial Note on Part 142

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 142.23 Time limit for filing documentation after release.

The applicable documentation described in § 142.22(b) shall be filed, and estimated duties, if any, shall be deposited, within 10 working days after the merchandise or any part of the merchandise is authorized for release under a special permit for immediate delivery or, for quota class merchandise within the quota period, whichever expires first.

[T.D. 79-221, 44 FR 46821, Aug. 9, 1979; T.D. 80-26, 45 FR 3901, Jan. 21, 1980; T.D. 98-34, 63 FR 19399, Apr. 20, 1998]
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Customs and Border Protection
 AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.
 ACTION: General notice.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations § 111.51(a), the following individual Customs broker license and any and all permits have been cancelled due to the death of the broker: Name
License No.
Port nameRichard J. Oates
05109
Mobile
 Dated: October 8, 2004. Jayson P. Ahern, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations.


[FR Doc. 04-23808 Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
Organization

Nalional Busincss Aircrafj ASSOl:iafion

Rcgional Airline Association

AirCTaf( Owncl"S & Pilots Association

ATA

Person Cor'!tacted

Eli Cotti I

Dave Lottcircr

Robert Hackman

Craig Fabian

Response