alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62254-62255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23762]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by November 
24, 2004.
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: Tender of service and Letter of Intent 
for Personal Property Household Goods and Unaccompanied Baggage 
Shipments; DD Form 619, Statement of Accessorial Services Performed and 
DD Form 619-1, Statement of Accessorial Services Performed (Storage-In-
Transit Delivery and Reweigh); OMB Control Number 0702-0022.
    Type of Request: Reinstatement.
    Number of Respondents: 2,636.
    Responses Per Respondent: 168 (average).
    Annual Responses: 441,677.
    Average Burden Per Response: 5 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 70,548.
    Needs and Uses: Since household goods (HHG) move at Government 
expense, data is needed to choose the best service at the lowest cost 
to the Government. The information provided by the carrier serves as a 
bid for contract to transport HHG, unaccompanied baggage, mobile homes, 
and boats. This information is collected on a regular basis, but is 
submitted intermittently throughout the year. Best-service-for-least-
cost carrier received the contract. DD Form 619 certified that 
accessorial services were actually performed. The government would not 
know which carrier to use for shipping personal property if they could 
not collect this information.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for profit.
    Frequency: On occasion.

[[Page 62255]]

    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jacqueline Zeiher. Written comments and 
recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent 
to Ms. Zeiher at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer for 
DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing. Written requests for 
copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Mr. 
Cushing, WHS/ESCD/Information Management Division, 1225 South Clark 
Street, Suite 504, Arlington, VA 22202-4326.

    Dated: October 5, 2004.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-23762 Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
§ 175.2 Contents of request. The request for information shall contain the following information: ( a ) The name of the person making the request, his principal place of business, and the fact that he is a domestic interested party;
( b ) A designation of the imported merchandise for which the classification, appraised value and rate is requested; and
( c ) A showing of the class or kind of merchandise manufactured, produced, or sold by him which is claimed to be similar to the imported merchandise in such detail as will permit the Commissioner to establish the similarity between the domestic and foreign merchandise.
[T.D. 70-181, 35 FR 13432, Aug. 22, 1970, as amended by T.D. 80-271, 45 FR 75642, Nov. 17, 1980]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-23287-CIV-GAYLES/OTAZO-REYES

LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

IMPERIAL BRANDS PLC, et al.,

Defendants. 

______________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on April 21, 2023, for a Telephonic Status 

Conference (“Status Conference”) on the Court’s Order on Report and Recommendation [D.E. 

307]. In accordance with the parties’ input and agreement at the Status Conference, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. By Friday, May 19, 2023, Defendants Imperial Brands PLC (“Imperial”), WPP 

PLC (“WPP”), Young & Rubicam LLC (“Y&R”), and BCW LLC (“BCW”) (WPP, Y&R, and 

BCW, together, “WPP Defendants”) (Imperial and WPP Defendants, together, “Defendants”) 

SHALL SUBMIT post-remand briefs in accordance with the following requirements:

• Defendants shall submit a joint brief and the WPP Defendants and Imperial 

shall submit individual briefs, as discussed at the Status Conference, with 

respect to the issues to be addressed on remand by the undersigned pursuant to

the Court’s Order on Report and Recommendation [D.E. 307]. 

• Defendants’ joint brief shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages; and Imperial’s and 

WPP Defendants’ individual briefs shall not exceed ten (10) pages each. 

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 316 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/21/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

2. By Friday, June 16, 2023, Plaintiffs Luis Manuel Rodriguez, Maria Teresa 

Rodriguez, Alfredo Ramon Forns, Ramon Alberto Rodriguez, Raul Lorenzo Rodriguez, Christina 

Conroy, and Francisco Ramon Rodriguez (“Plaintiffs”) SHALL RESPOND to Defendants’ joint 

brief and Imperial’s and WPP Defendants’ individual briefs. Plaintiffs’ response to Defendants’ 

joint brief shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages; and Plaintiffs’ responses to Imperial’s and WPP 

Defendants’ individual briefs shall not exceed ten (10) pages each. 

3. By Friday, June 30, 2023, Defendants SHALL REPLY to Plaintiffs’ responses, 

limited in length to fifteen (15) pages. Defendants may apportion this page limit among them as

they see fit.

4. A hearing on the parties’ post-remand briefing is hereby set for Tuesday, July 25, 

2023, at 10:30 A.M. The hearing will be conducted by Zoom video conference. Conference 

instructions will be provided to counsel via e-mail. The Court has set aside the entire business day 

with appropriate breaks for this matter.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 21st day of April, 2023.

___________________________________

ALICIA M. OTAZO-REYES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

cc: United States District Judge Darrin P. Gayles

Counsel of Record

 

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 316 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/21/2023 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.866 Declaration not required. ( a ) *General.* Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, an importer will not be required to submit a declaration under § 10.864 of this subpart for: ( 1 ) A non-commercial importation of a good; or
( 2 ) A commercial importation for which the value of the originating goods does not exceed U.S. $2,500.
( b ) *Exception.* If the Center director determines that an importation described in paragraph (a) of this section may reasonably be considered to have been carried out or planned for the purpose of evading compliance with the rules and procedures governing claims for preference under the OFTA, the Center director will notify the importer that for that importation the importer must submit a declaration. The importer must submit such a declaration within 30 days from the date of the notice. Failure to timely submit the declaration will result in denial of the claim for preferential tariff treatment.
[CBP Dec. 11-01, 76 FR 701, Jan. 6, 2011, as amended by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93014, Dec. 20, 2016]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### U.S. Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 16, 2004, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), North American Association of Food Equipment Manufacturers (“NAFEM”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: North American Association of Food Equipment Manufacturers, Chicago, IL. The nature and scope of NAFEM's standards development activities are: NAFEM Data Protocol—a standard set of rules that governs data exchange between commercial food service equipment and a computer.

Dorothy B. Fountain, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-23776  Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
##### 



Exhibit 13.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Distribución y Servicio D&S S.A (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Miguel Núñez Sfeir, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Miguel Núñez Sfeir By: Miguel Núñez Sfeir
Chief Financial Officer
Distribución y Servicio D&S S.A.
July 15, 2005 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be
deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.215 Filing of claim for preferential treatment. ( a ) *Declaration.* In connection with a claim for preferential treatment for a textile or apparel article described in § 10.213, the importer must make a written declaration that the article qualifies for that treatment. The inclusion on the entry summary, or equivalent documentation, of the subheading within Chapter 98 of the HTSUS under which the article is classified will constitute the written declaration. Except in any of the circumstances described in § 10.216(d)(1), the declaration required under this paragraph must be based on an original Certificate of Origin that has been completed and properly executed in accordance with § 10.214, that covers the article being imported, and that is in the possession of the importer.
( b ) *Corrected declaration.* If, after making the declaration required under paragraph (a) of this section, the importer has reason to believe that a Certificate of Origin on which a declaration was based contains information that is not correct, the importer must within 30 calendar days after the date of discovery of the error make a corrected declaration and pay any duties that may be due. A corrected declaration will be effected by submission of a letter or other written statement to the CBP port where the declaration was originally filed.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-008 January 23, 2002

NRC PROPOSES PROBABILITY LIMITS FOR EXCLUDING UNLIKELY EVENTS 

FROM CONSIDERATION AT POTENTIAL WASTE REPOSITORY 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is proposing to amend its regulations regarding a potential

nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, to set out numerical values for deciding when a

geological, hydrological or climatological feature, event or process is unlikely and therefore need not be

considered in determining whether the repository would meet radiation dose standards for groundwater

protection and human intrusion in NRCís regulations. 

Unlikely events would still have to be considered in determining whether the repository would

meet the overall 15-millirem radiation limit for protection of individuals.

Environmental Protection Agency standards, adopted by the NRC, require naturally occurring

ìunlikelyî features, events, and processes or sequences of processes (such as volcanoes) to be excluded

from determining compliance with radiation dose standards for groundwater protection and human

intrusion (for example, if someone drills into the repository).

The proposed NRC regulation defines ìunlikelyî by stating that DOEís analysis of the expected

repository performance in connection with the impacts of human intrusion and degradation of

groundwater need not include consideration of features, events or processes that are estimated to have

less than a 10 percent chance of occurring within 10,000 years of waste disposal.

 

 Interested persons are invited to submit comments within 75 days of publication of a Federal

Register notice, expected shortly. The comments may be mailed to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications

Staff. 

###
§ 148.67 Penalties for failure to declare articles. ( a ) *Avoidance of inspection.* When articles may be presented to the Customs office on the pier or at the landing place for inspection and clearance, if the circumstances under which the articles are landed indicate an attempt to avoid inspection, the penalties prescribed in section 453, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1453), shall be assessed.
( b ) *Articles landed without declaration.* Any article landed without having been properly declared as provided in § 148.62 shall be considered as having been unladen without a permit and the penalties provided in 19 U.S.C. 1453 or 19 U.S.C. 1644 and 1644a shall be assessed as applicable.
( c ) *Articles omitted from declaration.* If the declaration does not include all the articles landed, the crewmember shall be subject to the penalties prescribed in section 497, Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1497), with respect to the articles omitted. The penalties prescribed in section 453, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1453), shall not be assessed if any, though not all, of the articles are declared, except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section.
[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. 98-74, 63 FR 51290, Sept. 25, 1998]
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 98-17 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson April 28, 1998

OFFICE: 817/860-8128PAGER: (800)443-7243 (065477)

WATERFORD PLANT RATED ‘GOOD’ IN ALL AREAS

IN NRC ASSESSMENT REPORT

Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3, a nuclear power plant near Taft, Louisiana,

received safety performance ratings of “good” in all rated areas -- plant operations,

maintenance, engineering and plant support -- in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s latest

systematic assessment of licensee performance (SALP) for the facility.

The SALP report was sent April 24 to Energy Operations, Inc., which operates the plant.

The report evaluates the plant’s performance from December 1, 1996, through March 21 of this

year.

NRC and Entergy officials will discuss the report during a meeting set for 9 a.m.

Tuesday, May 12, in the Waterford 3 Energy Center. The meeting will be open for public

observation. NRC officials will be available afterwards to speak with reporters, state and local

officials, and members of the public.

NRC systematic assessment reports rate licensees in four functional areas -- plant

operation, maintenance, engineering, and plant support -- and assign ratings of Category 1, 2,

or 3 depending on whether their performance in those areas was superior, good or acceptable.

The report on Waterford 3 gives the plant a Category 2 rating in all areas indicating good safety

performance. Waterford was given the following scores on the current SALP and previous

SALP in December 1996:

Functional areas & ratings

Current Previous

Plant Operations 2 2

Maintenance 2 2

Engineering 2 3

Plant Support 2 2
In his cover letter to the report, NRC Regional Administrator Ellis W. Merschoff said,

“During this evaluation period, overall performance at Waterford 3 improved.”

“In the plant operations area, some improvements were noted over the previous

assessment,” Mr. Merschoff said. Opportunities for additional improvement in operations exist

in the areas of procedures and human performance. “

A number of programmatic enhancements were implemented to improve maintenance

planning, scheduling and efficiency; however, implementation of the welding program had some

deficiencies, Mr. Merschoff noted.

Radiological protection and emergency preparedness programs showed good

performance in the plant support area, while plant security was only “acceptable” and problems

evident in the last SALP period continued to exist.

In engineering the ability to identify emerging issues that affected equipment operability

was substantially improved. Problems maintaining the integrity of the design and licensing

bases continued to exist despite increased sensitivity in this area.

“Overall, your self-assessment activities improved the identification of conditions

adverse to quality at Waterford 3 . . . and organizational self-assessments contributed to the

overall improved performance,” Mr. Merschoff said.

###

EDITORS/NEWS DIRECTORS: A copy of the assessment report is available from this

office.
Editorial Note on Part 159
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93023, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 159.10 Notice of liquidation and date of liquidation for informal, mail, and baggage entries. ( a ) *Usual date of liquidation.* Except in the cases provided for in paragraph (b) of this section, the effective date of liquidation for informal, mail, and baggage entries will be: ( 1 ) The date of payment by the importer of duties due on the entry;
( 2 ) The date of release by CBP or the postmaster when the merchandise is released under such an entry free of duty; and
( 3 ) The date a free entry is accepted for articles released under a special permit for immediate delivery under part 142 of this chapter.
( b ) *Date of liquidation when duty cannot be determined at time of entry.* When the proper rate or amount of duty cannot be determined at the time of entry because the merchandise is subject to a tariff-rate quota, because of a missing document which, if for free entry, is not produced prior to the release of the merchandise to the importer, or because of any other reason, the printed notice of liquidation appearing on the receipt issued for any money collected on the entry will be voided. When the tariff status of the merchandise either as dutiable or free is finally ascertained it will be noted on the entry. The effective date of liquidation will be the date of the notice of liquidation required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
( c ) *Notice of liquidation* — ( 1 ) *Dutiable entries.* Where duties are paid on an entry in accordance with paragraph (a)(1) of this section, notice of liquidation is furnished by a suitable printed statement appearing on the receipt issued for duties collected. No other notice of liquidation will be given, but notice of reliquidation of any such entry will be given in the place and manner specified in § 159.9(b).
( 2 ) *Free entries.* Notice of liquidation is furnished by release of the merchandise under a free entry in accordance with paragraph (a)(2) of this section, or by acceptance of the free entry in accordance with paragraph (a)(3) of this section after release under a special permit for immediate delivery. No further notice of the liquidation of such entries will be given.
( 3 ) *Entries where duty cannot be determined at time of entry.* When the proper rate or amount of duty cannot be determined at the time of entry as set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, notice of liquidation will be given in the manner specified in § 159.9 for formal entries.
[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17482, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 90-1, 54 FR 52933, Dec. 26, 1989; CBP Dec. 11-02, 76 FR 2576, Jan. 14, 2011; CBP Dec. No. 16-25, 81 FR 89381, Dec. 12, 2016]
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-01-0125-Final Rulemaking to Amend 10 CFR PT 55, "Operators' Licenses," Re Op. Lic. Eligibility & Use of Simulation Facilities in Op. Lic. & Rev. 3 of Regulatory Guide 1.149, "Nuclear Power Plant Simulation Facilities for Use in Operator Training...

Accession Number: ML011510412

Date Released: Monday, July 31, 2023

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML011510364 - SECY-01-0125 - Final Rulemaking to Amend 10 CFR Part 55, "Operators' Licenses," Regarding Operator License Eligiiliby and the Use of Simulation Facilities in Operator Licensing; and, Revision 3 of Regulatory Guide 1.149, "Nuclear Power Plant Simulatior (6 page(s), 7/10/2001)
    - ML011510418 - SECY-01-0125-Attachment 1- Federal Register Notice - 10 CFR Part 55 Operator License Eligibility and Use of Simulation Facilities in Operator Licensing (38 page(s), 7/10/2001)
    - ML011520015 - SECY-01-0125-Attachment 2-Regulatory Guide 1.149, Revision 3 - Nuclear Power Plant Simulation Facilities for Use in Operator Training and License Examinations (19 page(s), 7/10/2001)
    - ML011690325 - SECY-01-0125-Attachment 2 (continued) - RG.1.149 Analysis of Public Comments with CRGR comments (13 page(s), 6/18/2001)
    - ML011510432 - SECY-01-0125-Attachment 3-Regulatory Analysis - Revision of 10 CFR Part 55 - Operators' Licenses/Operator License Eligibility and the Use of Simulation Facilities in Operator Licensing (15 page(s), 7/10/2001)
    - ML011490281 - SECY-01-0125-Attachment 4-5/29/01 Minutes of the Committee to Review Generic Requirements Meeting Number 363 (18 page(s), 5/29/2001)
    - ML011520264 - SECY-01-0125-Attachment 5-Memo to William Travers from John Larkins Subject:  Proposed Final Rulemaking to Amend 10 CFR Part 55 and Associated Regulatory Guide 1.149, Revision 3 (1 page(s), 5/15/2001)
    - ML011520259 - SECY-01-0125 - Attachment 6 - Submission of Federal Rules Under the Congressional Review Act President of the Senate/Speaker of the House of Representatives/GAO (6 page(s), 6/6/2001)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer