alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61679-61680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23433]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Guide to Community Preventive Services (GCPS) Task Force

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention CDC) announces the following meeting:

    Name: Task Force on Community Preventive Services.
    Times and Dates: 8:30 a.m.-6 p.m., October 20, 2004. 8:30 a.m.-1 
p.m., October 21, 2004.
    Place: The Crowne Plaza Ravinia, 4355 Ashford Dunwoody Road, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30346-1521, telephone (770) 395-7700.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available.
    Purpose: The mission of the Task Force is to develop and publish 
a Guide to Community Preventive Services, which is based on the best 
available scientific evidence and current expertise regarding 
essential public health and what works in the delivery of those 
services.
    Matters To Be Discussed: Agenda items include: briefings on 
administrative information, dissemination and partnerships, and 
reactions to previously completed reviews on home visiting for 
violence prevention; discussions of method issues including how 
better to communicate findings of insufficient evidence and ways to 
link systematic review findings to ``How to'' materials that will 
make it easier for users to implement effective interventions; and 
progress on reviews of evidence on school based nutrition, folic 
acid fortification and supplementation, prevention of HIV in men who 
have sex with men, worksite health promotion, and alcohol use 
prevention.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person or Additional Information: Peter Briss, M.D., 
Chief, Community Guide Branch, Division of Prevention Research and 
Analytic Methods, Epidemiology Program Office, CDC, 1600 Clifton 
Road, M/S: E90, Atlanta, GA 30333, Phone 404-498-6292, email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f5f4d5d465c5c6f4c4b4c01484059"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c6b6a4b4afb5b586a5a2a5e8a1a9b0">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Persons interested in reserving a space for this meeting should 
call 404-498-6180 by close of business on October 18, 2004.

[[Page 61680]]

    The Director, Management Analysis and Services office has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: October 14, 2004.
Alvin Hall,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 04-23433 Filed 10-19-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Record of Discussion Docket No. FAA-

### ~t3 

# -t){"/I; Directorate Identifier:

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGANIZA TTON PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

### GE 

### Paul Young l / 30/ 2013 Concur. 

### ATA 

### Joe White 2/ 112013 Concur.

Other/ Additional Information:



### 9
#### John T. Clarke, Respondent, v. Nathan J. Miller and Another, Appellants, and Abraham P. Miller and Another, Defendants, Individually and as Copartners, etc.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Ho opinion. Present— Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §1386. Adjustment for partial withdrawal; determination of amount; reduction for partial withdrawal liability; procedures applicable

(a) The amount of an employer's liability for a partial withdrawal, before the application of sections 1399(c)(1) and 1405 of this title, is equal to the product of—

(1) the amount determined under section 1391 of this title, and adjusted under section 1389 of this title if appropriate, determined as if the employer had withdrawn from the plan in a complete withdrawal—

(A) on the date of the partial withdrawal, or

(B) in the case of a partial withdrawal described in section 1385(a)(1) of this title (relating to 70-percent contribution decline), on the last day of the first plan year in the 3-year testing period,

multiplied by

(2) a fraction which is 1 minus a fraction—

(A) the numerator of which is the employer's contribution base units for the plan year following the plan year in which the partial withdrawal occurs, and

(B) the denominator of which is the average of the employer's contribution base units for—

(i) except as provided in clause (ii), the 5 plan years immediately preceding the plan year in which the partial withdrawal occurs, or

(ii) in the case of a partial withdrawal described in section 1385(a)(1) of this title (relating to 70-percent contribution decline), the 5 plan years immediately preceding the beginning of the 3-year testing period.

(b)(1) In the case of an employer that has withdrawal liability for a partial withdrawal from a plan, any withdrawal liability of that employer for a partial or complete withdrawal from that plan in a subsequent plan year shall be reduced by the amount of any partial withdrawal liability (reduced by any abatement or reduction of such liability) of the employer with respect to the plan for a previous plan year.

(2) The corporation shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to provide for proper adjustments in the reduction provided by paragraph (1) for—

(A) changes in unfunded vested benefits arising after the close of the prior year for which partial withdrawal liability was determined,

(B) changes in contribution base units occurring after the close of the prior year for which partial withdrawal liability was determined, and

(C) any other factors for which it determines adjustment to be appropriate,

so that the liability for any complete or partial withdrawal in any subsequent year (after the application of the reduction) properly reflects the employer's share of liability with respect to the plan.

(Pub. L. 93–406, title IV, §4206, as added Pub. L. 96–364, title I, §104(2), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1222.)
### §2216. Food service operations

#### (a) Restaurant, catering, and vending

The Architect of the Capitol, acting through the Chief Executive Officer, shall establish within the Capitol Visitor Center a restaurant and other food service facilities, including catering services and vending machines.

#### (b) Contract for food service operations

#### (1) In general

The Architect of the Capitol, acting through the Chief Executive Officer, may enter into a contract for food service operations within the Capitol Visitor Center.

#### (2) Existing contract unaffected

Nothing in paragraph (1) shall be construed to affect any contract for food service operations within the Capitol Visitor Center in effect on October 20, 2008.

#### (c) Deposits

All net profits from the food service operations within the Capitol Visitor Center and all commissions received from the contractor for such food service operations shall be deposited in the Capitol Visitor Center Revolving Fund established under section 2231 of this title.

#### (d) Exception to prohibition of sale or solicitation on Capitol grounds

Section 5104(c) of title 40 shall not apply to any activity carried out under this section.

(Pub. L. 110–437, title II, §206, Oct. 20, 2008, 122 Stat. 4988.)
### [§405. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §491(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 848]

Section, added Pub. L. 87–792, §5(a), Oct. 10, 1962, 76 Stat. 826; amended Pub. L. 89–97, title I, §106(d)(5), July 30, 1965, 79 Stat. 337; Pub. L. 91–172, title V, §515(c)(1), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 645; Pub. L. 93–406, title II, §§2004(c)(2), 2005(c)(11), Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 986, 992; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834; Pub. L. 97–34, title III, §313(a), (b)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 285, 286; Pub. L. 97–452, §2(c)(1), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2478; Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title I, §42(a)(6), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 557, related to qualified bond purchase plans.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable to obligations issued after Dec. 31, 1983, see section 491(f)(1) of Pub. L. 98–369, set out as an Effective Date of 1984 Amendment note under section 62 of this title.

#### Rollover of Existing Bonds Into Qualified Employer Plans

Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §491(c)(1), (f)(2), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 848, 853, provided that, applicable to redemptions after July 18, 1984, in taxable years ending after such date, subsec. (d)(3)(A) of this section, as in effect before its repeal, is amended to read as follows:

"(A) In general.—If—

"(i) any qualified bond is redeemed,

"(ii) any portion of the excess of the proceeds from such redemption over the basis of such bond is transferred to an individual retirement plan which is maintained for the benefit of the individual redeeming such bond, or to a qualified trust (as defined in section 402(a)(5)(D)(iii)) for the benefit of such individual, and

"(iii) such transfer is made on or before the 60th day after the individual received the proceeds of such redemption,

then gross income shall not include the proceeds to the extent so transferred and the transfer shall be treated as a rollover contribution described in section 408(d)(3)."

#### Bonds Under Qualified Bond Purchase Plans Redeemable at any Time After July 18, 1984

Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title IV, §491(f)(4), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 853, provided that: "Notwithstanding—

"(A) subparagraph (D) of section 405(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (as in effect before its repeal by this section) [see above], and

"(B) the terms of any bond described in subsection (b) of such section 405,

such a bond may be redeemed at any time after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 18, 1984] in the same manner as if the individual redeeming the bond had attained age 591⁄2."
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2010 

d0621 

Order 

 

June 28, 2010 

140648 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140648 

 COA: 295088 

Wayne CC: 08-014673-FC; 

DWAYNE CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS, 08-014708-FC; 08-014710-FC 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 5, 2010 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consoliated balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations and
consolidated statements of cash flow found on pages 3, 5 and 6 of the Company's
Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 27, 1997, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                              34
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,804
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,428
<INVENTORY>                                    150,084
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               261,320
<PP&E>                                         150,981
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,065
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 419,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           80,086
<BONDS>                                        220,359
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                     110,669
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   419,168
<SALES>                                        370,633
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               370,633
<CGS>                                          305,674
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  305,674
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,728
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   585
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,957
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,274
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,702
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,572
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,572
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .99
        

</TABLE>
§ 133.32 Application to record copyright. An application to record a copyright to secure customs protection against the importation of infringing copies or phonorecords shall be in writing addressed to the IPR & Restricted Merchandise Branch, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC 20229, and shall include the following information: ( a ) The name and complete address of the copyright owner or owners;
( b ) If the applicant is a person claiming actual or potential injury by reason of actual or contemplated importations of copies or phonorecords of the eligible work, a statement setting forth the circumstances of such actual or potential injury;
( c ) The country of manufacture of genuine copies or phonorecords of the protected work;
( d ) The name and principal address of any foreign person or business entity authorized or licensed to use the protected work, and a statement as to the exclusive rights authorized;
( e ) The foreign title of the work, if different from the U.S. title; and
( f ) In the case of an application to record a copyright in a sound recording, a statement setting forth the name(s) of the performing artist(s), and any other identifying names appearing on the surface of reproduction of the sound recording, or its label or container.
[T.D. 87-40, 52 FR 9474, Mar. 25, 1987, as amended by T.D. 91-77, 56 FR 46115, Sept. 10, 1991; T.D. 99-27, 64 FR 13675, Mar. 22, 1999]
§ 307.20 Noncompliance. EDA will take appropriate compliance actions as detailed in § 307.21 for the RLF Recipient's failure to operate the RLF in accordance with the RLF Plan, the terms and conditions of the RLF Grant, or this subpart, including but not limited to: ( a ) Failing to obtain prior EDA approval for material changes to the RLF Plan, including provisions for administering the RLF;
( b ) Failing to submit an updated RLF Plan to EDA in accordance with § 307.9(c);
( c ) Failing to submit timely progress, financial, and audit reports in the format required by the RLF Grant and § 307.14, including the Form ED-209 RLF report;
( d ) Failing to manage the RLF Grant in accordance with Prudent Lending Practices, as defined in § 307.8;
( e ) Holding RLF Cash Available for Lending so that it is 50 percent or more of the RLF Capital Base for 24 months without an EDA-approved extension request based on other EDA risk analysis factors or other extenuating circumstances;
( f ) Making an ineligible loan;
( g ) Failing to disburse the EDA funds in accordance with the time schedule prescribed in the RLF Grant;
( h ) Failing to sequester funds or remit the interest on EDA's portion of the sequestered funds to the U.S. Treasury, as directed by EDA;
( i ) Failing to comply with the audit requirements set forth in subpart F to 2 CFR part 200 and the related Compliance Supplement, including reference to the correctly valued EDA RLF Federal expenditures in the SEFA, timely submission of audit reports to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, and the inclusion of the RLF program as an appropriately audited program;
( j ) Failing to implement timely resolutions to audit findings or questioned costs contained in the annual audit, as applicable;
( k ) Failing to comply with an EDA-approved corrective action plan to remedy persistent noncompliance with RLF-related findings;
( l ) Failing to comply with the conflicts of interest provisions set forth in § 302.17; and
( m ) Making unauthorized use of RLF Cash Available for Lending in violation of § 307.18(c).
[82 FR 57058, Dec. 1, 2017]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsScalable problems and memory bounded speedupIn this paper three models of parallel speedup are studied. They are fixed-size speedup, fixed-time speedup and memory-bounded speedup. The latter two consider the relationship between speedup and problem scalability. Two sets of speedup formulations are derived for these three models. One set considers uneven workload allocation and communication overhead and gives more accurate estimation. Another set considers a simplified case and provides a clear picture on the impact of the sequential portion of an application on the possible performance gain from parallel processing. The simplified fixed-size speedup is Amdahl's law. The simplified fixed-time speedup is Gustafson's scaled speedup. The simplified memory-bounded speedup contains both Amdahl's law and Gustafson's scaled speedup as special cases. This study leads to a better understanding of parallel processing.Document ID19930007365Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsSun, Xian-He*(Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering Hampton, VA, United States)*Ni, Lionel M.*(Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1992Subject CategoryMathematical And Computer Sciences (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA-CR-189726NAS 1.26:189726ICASE-92-59AD-A259227Accession Number93N16554Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-19480CONTRACT_GRANT: NSF ECS-88-14207PROJECT: RTOP 505-90-52-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930007365.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
469 P.2d 151

#### Leanne M. BACA, Administratrix of the Estate of Willie Frank Hasty, Jr., Deceased, and Willie Frank Hasty, Sr., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Guadalupe H. CEBALLOS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 9051.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

May 19, 1970.

COMPTON, Chief Justice and TACK-ETT, WATSON, SISK and McKENNA, Justices concurring.

Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 439, 81 N.M. 537, 469 P.2d 516 be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
### **CHAPTER 1—LABOR STATISTICS**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS

Sec.
1.
Design and duties of bureau generally.
2.
Collection, collation, and reports of labor statistics.
2a.
Omitted.
2b.
Studies of productivity and labor costs in industries.
3.
Commissioner; appointment and tenure of office; compensation.
4.
Duties of Commissioner in general.
5.
Bulletin as to labor conditions.
6.
Annual and special reports to President and Congress.
7.
Repealed.
8.
Unemployment data relating to Americans of Spanish origin or descent.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—SPECIAL STATISTICS

9.
Authorization of special studies, compilations, and transcripts on request; cost.
9a.
Credit of receipts.
9b.
Rules and regulations.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). A R / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T E L I S AN GE L A O L I VE I R A C AR DO S OC AE T AN O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 71956 A ge nc yN o. A 097- 344- 094 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J anua ry11, 2010 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T R O T T , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E l i s ange l aO l i ve i r aC ar dos o- C a e t ano, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of B r a z i l , pe t i t i ons for r evi ew of an order of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s ( “ B IA ”) denyi ng her mo t i o n t o r e o p e n r e mo v a lp r o c e e d i n g s . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r8 U . S. C. 

# FI LED JAN 21 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSA R/ Res ea r ch 07- 71956 2 § 1252. W e r e vi e w f

orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of am ot i on t o r e ope n, O rdo n ezv . I

NS , 345 F . 3d 777, 782 ( 9th C i r . 2003) , a nd w e de nythe pe t i t i on f or r e v i e w. T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on by denyi ng the m ot i on t o reopen because the B IA consi dere d the evi dence C ar do so-C ae t ano sub m i tt ed and act ed w ith in its b r o a dd is c r e tio n in d e te rm in in g th a t th e e v id e n c e w a s in s u f f ic ie n t to w a rr a n t r e o p e n in g . Se e S i n gh v . I NS , 295 F . 3d 1037, 1039 ( 9th C i r . 2002) ( the B I A ’ s de ni a l of

am ot i on t o r e ope n s ha l l be r e ve r s e d i f i ti s “ arbi tr ary , i rr a t i ona l , or contraryt o l aw . ”) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.