alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To:        D. DUNSMUIR INVESTMENTS CANADA LIMITED

FROM:      D'ANGELO BRANDS LTD.

AND FROM:  FRANK D'ANGELO

DATE:      SEPTEMBER 13, 2002


          IN CONSIDERATION for the sum of $1,200,000.00, we promise to pay,
jointly and severally, to D. DUNSMUIR INVESTMENTS CANADA LIMITED (the "Lender")
in lawful money of Canada, at the offices of the Lender, 1 Royal Gate Boulevard,
Woodbridge, Ontario, Canada, on demand, the principal sum of $1,200,000.00,
together with interest thereon calculated and payable monthly on the 13th day of
each month, at the rate of 20% per annum from September 13, 2002, to the date of
repayment in full; Provided no interest shall be payable if the principal sum is
paid on or before September 30, 2002.

          THE UNDERSIGNED may repay the principal, in whole or in part, at any
time before demand without notice or bonus. All arrears of interest shall be
added to the principal sum and shall bear interest at the rate aforesaid. All
payments received hereunder shall be applied first to payment of interest.

          AND THE UNDERSIGNED hereby authorizes the holder of this note from
time to time to grant at its option an extension or extensions in whole or in
part, with or without notice to the undersigned, also agreeing that in case of
non- payment of the principal after maturity, when due , suit may be brought by
the holder of this note against the undersigned at the option of the said
holder, the holder of the said note reserving all rights  against whom suit is
not commenced.

          AND THE UNDERSIGNED agrees that in the event any payment payable
hereunder is not paid when due the undersigned shall pay to the Lender the sum
of $1000.00 as penalty.

          AND THE UNDERSIGNED hereby waives presentment for payment, protest and
notice of protest and notice of non- payment of this note and of any extension
thereof, or any installments due thereunder, subject to the notice provisions
contained herein.


This promissory note shall be binding upon the undersigned and their respective
successors, heirs and legal personal representatives and is fully negotiable by
the Lender.

          The undersigned have hereunto caused their signatures to be affixed at
the City of Vaughan, on the 13th day of September, 2002.

                    )
                    )         D'ANGELO BRANDS LTD.
----------------------------  )         per:
Witness             )
                    )
                    )         ------------------------------------
                    )         Frank D'Angelo
                    )
                    )         I have the authority to bindthe Corporation
                    )
                    )         ---------------------------------------
                              Frank D'Angelo
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

      ( print page 61864)    
                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 21, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), American Society of Agricultural Engineers (“ASAE”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI. The nature and scope of ASAE's standards development activities are: ASAE serves as the primary U.S. developer of standards, engineering practices and data (collectively referred to as standards) for engineering applicable to agricultural, food, and biological systems. The scope of these documents encompasses, but is not limited to, the following subject areas: agricultural equipment; biological and biological systems engineering; natural resources management; irrigation and drainage; agricultural structures and environment; livestock production; food and bioprocess engineering; information and electrical technologies; forest engineering; energy production and distribution for agricultural locales and operations; renewable fuels and biomass; aquacultural engineering; nursery and greenhouse operations; and agricultural safety and rural health.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-23504 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### §796e–3. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subpart $22,878,000 for fiscal year 2015, $24,645,000 for fiscal year 2016, $25,156,000 for fiscal year 2017, $25,714,000 for fiscal year 2018, $26,319,000 for fiscal year 2019, and $26,877,000 for fiscal year 2020.

(Pub. L. 93–112, title VII, §714, as added Pub. L. 105–220, title IV, §410, Aug. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1226; amended Pub. L. 113–128, title IV, §476(e), July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1691.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 796e–3, Pub. L. 93–112, title VII, §714, as added Pub. L. 102–569, title VII, §701(2), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4452, authorized appropriations, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 105–220.

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–128 substituted "$22,878,000 for fiscal year 2015, $24,645,000 for fiscal year 2016, $25,156,000 for fiscal year 2017, $25,714,000 for fiscal year 2018, $26,319,000 for fiscal year 2019, and $26,877,000 for fiscal year 2020." for "such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 1999 through 2003."
#### § 147.24 Merchandise subject to licensing.

Merchandise, the importation of which is subject to the licensing regulations of any agency of the U.S. Government, may be entered for a fair only upon the presentation of the required license, or a waiver of such license.
Exhibit 15.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTRERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-156686) of our reports dated April 30, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
of Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
included in this annual report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2013.





|Tel- Aviv, Israel |  | /s/ KOST, FORER, GABBAY & KASIERER
|----------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|December 31, 2014 |  | KOST, FORER, GABBAY & KASIERER    
|                  |  | A Member of Ernst & Young Global
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-217 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, December 8, 1998)

NRC OFFERS OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING

ON REQUEST TO AMEND B&W LICENSE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is considering amending a Babcock and Wilcox

Company (B&W) nuclear materials license to establish a date when the company must submit a

decommissioning plan for its Shallow Land Disposal Area in Parks Township, Pennsylvania.

Any person whose interest may be affected by the amendment may request a hearing.

In July of this year, B&W asked the NRC to amend its nuclear materials license to

require the company to submit a decommissioning plan for the Shallow Land Disposal Area by

December 6, 2000. The NRC has not yet made a determination as to whether to grant B&W’s

request.

The Shallow Land Disposal Area is located in Armstrong County, about 23 miles eastnortheast of Pittsburgh. It was formerly owned by Nuclear Materials and Equipment

Corporation (NUMEC), which also operated the nearby Apollo Nuclear Fuel Fabrication Facility.

Until 1970, the disposal area was used by NUMEC to dispose of both radioactively

contaminated wastes (primarily uranium and thorium) and non-radioactive wastes in

accordance with NRC regulations in effect at that time.

Atlantic Richfield Company purchased stock in NUMEC in 1967 and then sold it to B&W

in 1971.

Requests for a hearing on the license amendment request must be filed within 30

days of a Federal Register notice on the subject, expected to be published about December 10.

The request should be directed to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20555, Attention, Rulemakings and Adjudications Branch. Other requirements

for filing a hearing request are described in the Federal Register notice.

###
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 07, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 07, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22I0197. SYNAPSE SERVICES LLC v. CHRISTOPHER P. HOPKINS.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2021CV355526
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No.: 0:20-cv-61517-UU/REID

RUPERT ALEXANDERR DUNN,

Movant,

v.

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al.,

Respondents.

_____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Cause is before the Court upon Petitioner’s pro se Emergency Motion for Stay of 

Removal (D.E. 1) (the “Motion”).

THE COURT has considered the Motion and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. 

This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid, who, on October 1, 2020, 

issued a Report (the “Report”) (D.E. 6) recommending that the Motion be dismissed because 

“district courts lack habeas jurisdiction to entertain challenges to final orders of removal.” D.E. 6 

at 1 (quoting Themeus v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 643 F. App’x 830, 832 (11th Cir. 2016) (citing 8 

U.S.C. § 1252(a)(5)) (citations omitted)). Further, a petition for review of an order of removal and 

a request for stay of removal must be filed “with the court of appeals for the judicial circuit in 

which the immigration judge completed the proceedings.” Id. (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(2)).

Petitioner, who was given fourteen days to file objections to the Report, did not file 

objections. See LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 145 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 

(1988) (holding that failure to file timely objections bars the parties from attacking factual findings 

on appeal).

Case 0:20-cv-61517-UU Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/26/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

Upon de novo review, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Reid’s recommendations 

and concurs in all her findings. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report, D.E. 6, is RATIFIED, ADOPTED, and 

AFFIRMED. It is further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion, D.E. 1, is DISMISSED. It is further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is CLOSED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida this 26th__ day of October, 

2020.

_____________________________

URSULA UNGARO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies provided: 

Rupert Alexanderr Dunn, pro se

Case 0:20-cv-61517-UU Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/26/2020 Page 2 of 2
### §599. Termination of effect of chapter

This chapter shall cease to be effective five years after the date of the enactment of the Independent Counsel Reauthorization Act of 1994, except that this chapter shall continue in effect with respect to then pending matters before an independent counsel that in the judgment of such counsel require such continuation until that independent counsel determines such matters have been completed.

(Added Pub. L. 100–191, §2, Dec. 15, 1987, 101 Stat. 1306; amended Pub. L. 103–270, §2, June 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 732.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of the enactment of the Independent Counsel Reauthorization Act of 1994, referred to in text, is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 103–270, which was approved June 30, 1994.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–270 substituted "1994" for "1987".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–270 applicable with respect to independent counsels appointed before, on, or after June 30, 1994, see section 7(a) of Pub. L. 103–270, set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment; Transition Provisions note under section 591 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 15, 1987, see section 6 of Pub. L. 100–191, set out as a note under section 591 of this title.
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Tim Wan, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of RealNetworks, Inc.; and


2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: April 29, 2014








/s/ Tim Wan


Tim Wan


Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 31, 2017

a0522 

# Order

Clerk May 31, 2017

154069(25)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154069

COA: 331567

Wayne CC: 10

- 002260

- FC

TRAMMANUEL DURHAM

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 22,

2017 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
#### § 133.53 Refund of duty.

If a violation of the trademark or copyright laws is not discovered until after entry and deposit of estimated duty, the entry shall be endorsed with an appropriate notation and the duty refunded as an erroneous collection upon exportation or destruction of the prohibited articles in accordance with § 158.41 or § 158.45 of this chapter.

[T.D. 72-266, 37 FR 20678, Oct. 3, 1972, as amended by T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17447, July 2, 1973]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, David R. Callen, hereby certify that the December 31, 2010 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed by Ethan Allen Interiors Inc. (the “Company”), which contains the Company’s financial statements, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ David R. Callen |   | Vice President, Finance |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------|
| (David R. Callen)   |   | and   Treasurer         |

 

February 2, 2011

 

----
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Lezer Corp., Plaintiff,

v.

Noble Partners LLC, dba Noble 

Medical Supply and Sean Grady, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 20-23235-Civ-Scola

Order Referring Motion to Magistrate Judge

The Court refers Plaintiff Lezer Corp.’s motion for default final judgment

(ECF No. 25) to United States Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres for a report 

and recommendations, consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 72, and Rule 1(d) of the Local Magistrate Judge Rules.

The Court directs the Clerk to mail copies of this order to the Defendants 

at the addresses listed below. 

Done and ordered at Miami, Florida, on November 19, 2020.

________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Copies to:

Noble Partners LLC, doing business as Noble Medical Supply

Attn: Sean Grady, President 

12 Wellstone Drive 

Portland, ME 04013

Sean Grady

12 Wellstone Drive 

Portland, ME 04013

Case 1:20-cv-23235-RNS Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2020 Page 1 of 1
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT III-98-28 April 17, 1998

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH ALLIEDSIGNAL FOR ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE

ON RECENT INSPECTION FINDINGS AT METROPOLIS PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet April 29 in

Lisle, Illinois, with AlliedSignal, Inc., officials for a predecisional

enforcement conference on NRC inspections findings resulting from a

January 27 incident at the company's Metropolis, Illinois, uranium

processing plant.

The meeting will be at 1 p.m. in the Third Floor Conference Room

of the NRC's Region III Office, 801 Warrenville Road, Lisle. The

meeting will be open to public observation. NRC officials will be

available after the meeting for questions and comments from the public

and the news media.

In the January 27 incident, a small amount of uranium hexafluoride

was released inside the plant and three workers received minor burns or

skin irritations. The NRC conducted a special inspection, called an

Augmented Team Inspection (AIT), to review the circumstances of the

release of the uranium compound. The safety and environmental

consequences of the incident were minor.

The AIT inspection and a followup inspection determined that plant

personnel had not followed procedures during maintenance on plant

equipment, leading to the small release of uranium hexafluoride. The

inspectors also found other instances where the actual plant practices

do not comply with established procedures and identified other apparent

violations unrelated to the January 27 incident.

The purpose of the predecisional enforcement conference is to

discuss the apparent violations and provide the company an opportunity

to respond and to provide details of its corrective actions and other

additional information.

The information presented in the predecisional enforcement

conference will be considered in determining the appropriate

enforcement action. The enforcement action will not be determined at

the meeting; a decision on the enforcement action is usually issued

several weeks after the conference.

#####
### §360. Effect of recommendations on existing law and prior recommendations

The recommendations of the President taking effect as provided in section 359 of this title shall be held and considered to modify, supersede, or render inapplicable, as the case may be, to the extent inconsistent therewith—

(A) all provisions of law enacted prior to the effective date or dates of all or part (as the case may be) of such recommendations (other than any provision of law enacted with respect to such recommendations in the period beginning on the date the President transmits his recommendations to the Congress under section 358 of this title and ending on the date of their approval under section 359(2) of this title), and

(B) any prior recommendations of the President which take effect under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 90–206, title II, §225(j), Dec. 16, 1967, 81 Stat. 644; Pub. L. 95–19, title IV, §401(b), Apr. 12, 1977, 91 Stat. 46; Pub. L. 99–190, §135(f), Dec. 19, 1985, 99 Stat. 1322; Pub. L. 101–194, title VII, §701(h), Nov. 30, 1989, 103 Stat. 1766.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1989—Cl. (A). Pub. L. 101–194 substituted "(other than any provision of law enacted with respect to such recommendations in the period beginning on the date the President transmits his recommendations to the Congress under section 358 of this title and ending on the date of their approval under section 359(2) of this title), and" for "(other than any provision of law enacted in the period specified section 359 of this title with respect to such recommendations), and".

1985—Pub. L. 99–190 substituted "taking effect as provided in section 359 of this title shall" for "transmitted to the Congress immediately following a review conducted by the Commission in one of the fiscal years referred to in section 352(2) and (3) of this title shall, if approved by the Congress as provided in section 359 of this title,", and in cl. (A) struck out "in paragraph (1) of" before "section 359 of this title".

1977—Pub. L. 95–19 inserted ", if approved by the Congress as provided in section 359 of this title,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 16, 1967, see section 220(a)(1) of Pub. L. 90–206, set out as a note under section 3110 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.