alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 INCLUDED IN THE QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         10,533,486
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     429,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (40,296)
<INVENTORY>                                        22,771
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,159,004
<PP&E>                                          2,838,949
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (416,508)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 13,726,414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,151,838
<BONDS>                                           215,106
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                           228
<COMMON>                                            3,625
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,355,617
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   13,726,414
<SALES>                                           112,306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,670,878
<CGS>                                              70,288
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,022,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                8,502,632
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   33,177
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,964,699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,712,485)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,712,485)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,712,485)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (4.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (4.19)


</TABLE>
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**363 KA 14-00938**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAMUEL TILLMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (TIMOTHY P. MURPHY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (ASHLEY R. LOWRY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Sheila A. DiTullio, J.), rendered May 7, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [2]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal ( see generally People v Lopez , 6 NY3d 248, 256), and that valid waiver forecloses any challenge by defendant to the severity of the sentence ( see id. at 255; see generally People v Lococo , 92 NY2d 825, 827; People v Hidalgo , 91 NY2d 733, 737).

Entered: April 29, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit 12.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Miguel Núñez Sfeir, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Distribución y Servicio D&S S.A.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us and others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the“Evaluation Date”); and  (c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controlsand procedures which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;
 

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whetheror not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses.
/s/ Miguel Núñez Sfeir
Miguel Núñez Sfeir
May 7, 2003

Global Industries, Ltd.

8000 Global Drive

Carlyss, Louisiana 70665

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial information of Global Industries, Ltd. and subsidiaries for the periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, as indicated in our report dated May 7, 2004, because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-58048, 33-89778, and 333-69949 of Form S-8 and in Registration No. 333-86325 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New Orleans, Louisiana
**EXHIBIT 31.2** **CERTIFICATION**     I, Thomas Liguori, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on    Form 10-K/A    of Hypercom Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; /s/  Thomas    Liguori    Thomas Liguori    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     Date: March 23, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62069-62070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23734]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1548-DR]


Louisiana; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1548-DR), dated September 15, 2004, 
and related determinations.

Effective Date: October 14, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following 
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 15, 2004:

    Plaquemines Parish for [Categories C-G] under the Public 
Assistance program (already designated for Individual Assistance and 
Public Assistance (Categories A and B) debris removal and emergency 
protective measures, including direct Federal assistance, at 100 
percent Federal funding of the total eligible costs for a period of 
up to 72 hours.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment

[[Page 62070]]

Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, 
Individual and Household Housing; 97.049, Individual and Household 
Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individual and Household 
Program--Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, 
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-23734 Filed 10-21-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
### §6539. Abolition of statutory positions in Office of Secretary of Senate; Secretary's authority to establish and fix compensation for positions

Effective October 1, 1981, all statutory positions in the Office of the Secretary (other than the positions of the Secretary of the Senate, Assistant Secretary of the Senate, Parliamentarian, Financial Clerk, and Director of the Office of Classified National Security Information) are abolished, and in lieu of the positions hereby abolished the Secretary of the Senate is authorized to establish such number of positions as he deems appropriate and appoint and fix the compensation of employees to fill the positions so established; except that the annual rate of compensation payable to any employee appointed to fill any position established by the Secretary of the Senate shall not, for any period of time, be in excess of $1,000 less than the annual rate of compensation of the Secretary of the Senate for that period of time; and except that nothing in this section shall be construed to affect any position authorized by statute, if the compensation for such position is to be paid from the contingent fund of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 97–51, §114, Oct. 1, 1981, 95 Stat. 963.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 61a–11 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Increases in Compensation

Increases in compensation for Senate officers and employees under authority of Federal Pay Comparability Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 91–656), see Salary Directives of President pro tempore of the Senate, set out as notes under section 4571 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 204 (Friday, October 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23855]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, October 28, 2004 at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:
    Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Draft Advisory Opinion 2004-38: George Nethercutt and the 
Nethercutt for Senate Committee by counsel, Stephen M. Hoersting and 
Tim McKeever.
    Draft Advisory Opinion 2004-39: Washington State Republican Party 
by Chris Vance, Chairman (Tentative).
    Explanation and justification for the Political Committee 
rulemaking.
    Routine administrative matters.

SPECIAL EXECUTIVE SESSION:
    Date and Time: Thursday, October 28, 2004, to follow the opening 
meeting.
    Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.
    Status: This meeting will be closed to the public pursuant to 11 
CFR 2.4(b)(7).
    Person to Contact for Information: Mr. Robert Biersack, Acting 
Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-23855 Filed 10-20-04; 2:53 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Order filed September 27, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00621-CV

____________

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF GARY GOSINE AND EMMA 

MAE GOSINE

On Appeal from the 306th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 15-FD-2502

O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed August 8, 2016. To date, the filing 

fee of $205.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant is excused by statute or 

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 5. Therefore, the court issues the following order. 

Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $205.00 to the clerk 

of this court on or before October 12, 2016. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant fails 

to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be 

dismissed.

PER CURIAM
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.849 Importer obligations. ( a ) *General.* An importer who makes a claim for duty-free treatment under § 10.847 of this subpart for an article described in § 10.843 of this subpart: ( 1 ) Will be deemed to have certified that the article is eligible for duty-free treatment under this subpart;
( 2 ) Is responsible for the truthfulness of the statements and information contained in the declaration of compliance, if that document is required to be submitted to CBP pursuant to §§ 10.844(a)(4)(v) or 10.848(a) of this subpart; and
( 3 ) Is responsible for submitting any supporting documents requested by CBP and for the truthfulness of the information contained in those documents. When requested, CBP may arrange for the direct submission by the exporter, producer, or entity controlling production of business confidential or other sensitive information, including cost and sourcing information.
( b ) *Information provided by exporter, producer, or entity controlling production.* The fact that the importer has made a claim for duty-free treatment or prepared a declaration of compliance based on information provided by an exporter, producer, or entity controlling production will not relieve the importer of the responsibility referred to in paragraph (a) of this section.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 559 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 559

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Grand Ronde Reservation Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GRAND RONDE RESERVATION ACT AMENDMENT.

    Section 1(d) of Public Law 100-425 (commonly known as the ``Grand 
Ronde Reservation Act'') (102 Stat. 1594) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``lands within the State 
        of Oregon'' and inserting ``the 84 acres known as the Thompson 
        Strip'';
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
            ``(2) Gaming prohibition.--Any real property obtained by 
        the Tribes as part of a land claim settlement approved by the 
        United States shall not be eligible, or used, for any class II 
        gaming or class III gaming under the Indian Gaming Regulatory 
        Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) (as those terms are defined in 
        section 4 of that Act (25 U.S.C. 2703)).''.

SEC. 2. TREATY RIGHTS OF FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED TRIBES.

    Nothing in this Act, or an amendment made by this Act, shall be 
construed to enlarge, confirm, adjudicate, affect, or modify any treaty 
right of an Indian Tribe (as defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304)).

            Passed the Senate May 26, 2021.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 559

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend the Grand Ronde Reservation Act, and for other purposes.
```
## PaciFic: Alaska FreightiiVays

Docket Management Facility U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 Washington, D.C. 20590 Reference: No. FAA-2014-0107

To Whom It May Concern: 5/20/2014

We are writing in support ofthe Petition for Exemption, Docket Number FAA-2014-0107, wherein the Petitioner, Everts Air, seeks relieffrom certain requirements of

### interalia §121.436 ofTitle 14, Code of Federal Regulations. The recently enacted regulation requires co-pilots (second in command) hired or promoted to that position after31 July 2013 to be certified as captains (pilot in command) with respect to the aircraft type rating. This regulation will also require all pilots serving as second in command to be certified in this manner after01 January 2016. The petitioner, Tatonduk Outfitters, Ltd., d/b/a Everts Air provides essential services in a unique environment. There are no simulatortraining devices forseveral ofthe aircrafttheyoperate, including the DC-6 and C-46. Thus, all training must be conducted in the airplanes, in flight. It is noteworthythat Everts Air does notseek relieffrom the requirement that all pilots must possess airline transport licenses. This mandate will not result in an increased level ofsafety, rather a lowerstandard ofsafety as the more critical and technically demanding captain's maneuvers will now be required ofthe second in command candidate. Historically, training in aircraft ratherthan simulators has proven dangerous, particularly intraining lesser experienced pilots in emergency and abnormal procedures and maneuvers. This element represents an increased risk. When this rule was promulgated by Congress, there was an assumption made that all airline training was accomplished in asimulator. The simulator represents asafe and relatively low cost training environment. The cost oftraining a pilot in aflight simulator is on the orderof$14,000.00. The cost of training the same pilotforthe type rating course in the airplane is nearlyten times that, and represents a cost that Everts Air will have to pass along to us as the customer. We are deeply concerned thatthis cost will drive the petitionerto withdrawfrom several markets, leaving non-certificated and/orfewer safe operators. Their alternative is to increase the cost, making arctic operations impractical for industry, including aviation, thus increasing the cost ofliving in rural communities. The §121 air carrier has proven to be the safest supply chain for business, industryand residential needs in outlying areas. We agree with the petitioner's position thattraining to the level that was in place before the enactment of 14 CFR 121.436 represents continued service atthe highest standard ofsafety. In the interestofairsafety and viable logistics options for rural communities, we are in favor of supporting the Petition for Exemption, Docket Number FAA-2014-0107.