alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-054 August 24 , 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC PROPOSES $8,800 CIVIL PENALTY FOR PITTSBURGH MEDICAL FACILITY

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed an $8,800 fine against a Pittsburgh, Pa.,

medical facility for deliberately violating agency regulations pertaining to the possession and disposal

of radioactive material.

 Based on an inquiry conducted by the NRCís Office of Investigations, the agency has determined

that the South Pittsburgh Cancer Center, located on Clairton Boulevard, possessed depleted uranium

from January 1994 to December 1, 2000. The center did so even though the material, which was in the

form of bricks used for shielding for two linear accelerators, was not listed on an NRC license, as

required.

 Further, the NRC has found that the center tried to dispose of the depleted uranium in April 1998

and October 2000 by transferring it to persons who did not have an NRC license authorizing them to

possess radioactive material. For example, in the case of the April 1998 transfer, the material was

handed over to a handyman. That individual attempted to dispose of the depleted uranium but was

unable to do so after a radiation monitor alarmed at a disposal facility. The material was subsequently

returned to the center.

 In a letter to center owner/radiation safety officer Dr. Antonio J. Ambrad announcing the

enforcement decision, NRC Region I Administrator Hubert J. Miller said the agency was particularly

concerned that Ambrad had deliberately violated NRC requirements. ìIt is essential for the NRC to

maintain the highest confidence that licensees and their employees will abide by requirements designed

to protect the health and safety of the public,î Mr. Miller wrote.

 South Pittsburgh Cancer Center is required to submit a written response to the NRC within 30

days.

 ###
20-MJ-03308-TORRES

Case 1:20-mj-03308-EGT Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 1 of 19
20-MJ-03308-TORRES

Case 1:20-mj-03308-EGT Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 2 of 19
Case 1:20-mj-03308-EGT Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 3 of 19
Case 1:20-mj-03308-EGT Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 4 of 19
Case 1:20-mj-03308-EGT Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 5 of 19
Case 1:20-mj-03308-EGT Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 6 of 19
Case 1:20-mj-03308-EGT Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 7 of 19
Case 1:20-mj-03308-EGT Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 8 of 19
Case 1:20-mj-03308-EGT Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 9 of 19
Case 1:20-mj-03308-EGT Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 10 of 19
Case 1:20-mj-03308-EGT Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 11 of 19
Case 1:20-mj-03308-EGT Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 12 of 19
Case 1:20-mj-03308-EGT Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 13 of 19
Case 1:20-mj-03308-EGT Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 14 of 19
Case 1:20-mj-03308-EGT Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 15 of 19
Case 1:20-mj-03308-EGT Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 16 of 19
Case 1:20-mj-03308-EGT Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 17 of 19
Case 1:20-mj-03308-EGT Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 18 of 19
Case 1:20-mj-03308-EGT Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2020 Page 19 of 19
###### Editorial Note on Part 141

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 141.87 Breakdown on component materials.

Whenever the classification or appraisement of merchandise depends on the component materials, the invoice shall set forth a breakdown giving the value, weight, or other necessary measurement of each component material in sufficient detail to determine the correct duties.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000381 27-JUL-2018 07:53 AM
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 200 (Monday, October 18, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61357-61358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23229]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Coastal Engineering Research Board (CERB)

AGENCY: Department of Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
committee meeting:
    Name of Committee: Coastal Engineering Research Board (CERB).
    Date of Meeting: November 3-4, 2004.
    Place: Hilton Washington DC/Silver Spring, 8727 Colesvile Road, 
Silver Spring, MD, 20910.
    Time: 6:30 p.m to 8:30 p.m. (November 3, 2004); 8 a.m to 5 p.m. 
(November 3, 2004); 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. (November 4, 2004).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquiries and notice of intent to 
attend the meeting may be addressed to

[[Page 61358]]

Colonel James R. Rowan, Executive Secretary, Commander, U.S. Army 
Engineer Research and Development Center, Waterways Experiment Station, 
3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposed Agenda: The theme of the meeting is 
``Ocean Agency Collaboration.'' On Tuesday evening, November 2, there 
will be an icebreaker. On Wednesday morning, November 3, there will be 
a presentation on the ``U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy Report'' and a 
panel to discuss ``Possible Strategies for Implementing Ocean Policy 
Report Recommendations.'' The afternoon session will include a 
presentation entitled ``Interagency Collaboration as Part of the Corps 
Coastal Watershed Activities'' and a panel to discuss ``The Integration 
of Ocean/Coastal Watershed Perspectives Approach.'' On Thursday 
morning, November 4, there will be a presentation entitled ``Corps' 
Involvement in Interagency Shoreline Mapping and the Integrated Ocean 
Observing System'' and a panel to discuss ``Interagency Science and 
Technology Collaboration.'' During the afternoon, the members of the 
Board will meet in an Executive Session.
    These meetings are open to the public; participation by the public 
is scheduled for 4 p.m. on November 3.
    The entire meeting is open to the public but since seating capacity 
of the meeting room is limited, advance notice of intent to attend, 
although not required, is requested in order to assure adequate 
arrangements. Oral participation by public attendees is encouraged 
during the time scheduled on the agenda; written statements may be 
submitted prior to the meeting or up to 30 days after the meeting.

James R. Rowan,
Colonel, Corps of Engineers, Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-23229 Filed 10-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-61-M
#### The City of New York, Appellant, *v.*Edgar S. Appleby and John S. Appleby, Individually and as Executors, etc., of Charles E. Appleby, Deceased, Respondents.

(No. 2.)

First Department,

June 18, 1915.

See head note in *City of Mew York*v. *Appleby, Mo. 1 (ante,*p. 508).

Appeal by the plaintiff, The City of New York, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 26th day of May, 1914, upon a decision of the court after a trial at the New York Special Term.

*Curtis A. Peters,*for the appellant.

*Banton Moore,*for the respondents.

Scott, J.:

This action is one to foreclose a tax lien under section 1035 of the Greater New York charter (Laws of 1901, chap. 466), which was added thereto by chapter 490 of the Laws of 1908, and amended by chapter 65 of the Laws of 1911. The real property affected consists of land under water lying between Fortieth and Forty-first streets and west of Twelfth avenue in the borough of Manhattan, in the city of New York.

The many objections urged by the defendants, and which have been sustained at Special Term, are similar to those urged in a like action between the same parties (See *City of New York*v. *Appleby, No. 1,*168 App. Div. 503) affecting land under water between Thirty-ninth and Fortieth streets and west of Twelfth avenue, and decided herewith. For the reasons *553stated in that case we are of opinion that the judgment appealed from must be reversed and judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff, with costs in this court and the court below. The findings to be reversed and new findings to be made will he determined upon the settlement of the order to be entered herein.

Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, LAUGHLiNand Clarke, JJ., concurred.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and judgment directed in favor of plaintiff, with costs. Order to he settled on notice.
### §§46c, 46d. Repealed. Pub. L. 90–57, July 28, 1967, 81 Stat. 129

Section 46c, acts June 13, 1945, ch. 189, 59 Stat. 244; July 1, 1946, ch. 530, 60 Stat. 392; Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title I, §102, 60 Stat. 814; Nov. 1, 1951, ch. 665, Ch. 1, 65 Stat. 760; Aug. 1, 1953, ch. 304, title I, 67 Stat. 321; June 27, 1956, ch. 453, 70 Stat. 360; Jan. 6, 1964, Pub. L. 88–258, title IV, 77 Stat. 863; July 27, 1965, Pub. L. 89–90, 79 Stat. 268; Aug. 27, 1966, Pub. L. 89–545, 80 Stat. 357, provided for payment of long-distance telephone calls for Senators and Vice President made to and from Washington, D.C. See section 6314 of this title.

Section 46d, acts June 13, 1945, ch. 189, 59 Stat. 244; July 1, 1946, ch. 530, 60 Stat. 392; Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title I, §102, 60 Stat. 814; Aug. 1, 1953, ch. 304, title I, 67 Stat. 321; July 2, 1954, ch. 455, title I, 68 Stat. 400; July 31, 1958, Pub. L. 85–570, 72 Stat. 442; July 27, 1965, Pub. L. 89–90, 79 Stat. 268, provided for payment from contingent fund of Senate of long-distance telephone calls for Senators, originating and terminating outside Washington, D.C., and additional payments for calls to or from Washington, D.C. See section 6314 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 90–57 provided that the repeal is effective Jan. 1, 1968.
§ 145.34 Personal and household effects and tools of trade. ( a ) *U.S. military and civilian personnel returning from extended duty abroad.* Section 148.74 of this chapter sets forth specific requirements for exemptions from duty under subheading 9805.00.50, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202), for personal and household effects of military and civilian personnel of the United States returning upon the completion of extended duty abroad. A copy of the official travel orders shall be attached to or enclosed in each mail article and the outside of each mail article shall be clearly marked to show that exemption from duty is being claimed.
( b ) *Other personal and household effects, and tools of trade.* Certain personal and household effects and tools of trade may be passed free of duty without issuing an entry, in accordance with § 148.53 of this chapter.
[T.D. 73-135, 38 FR 13369, May 21, 1973, as amended by T.D. 78-102, 43 FR 14454, Apr. 6, 1978; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51263, Dec. 21, 1988]
###### Editorial Note on Part 141

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 141.44 Designation of Center and Customs ports in which power of attorney is valid.

Unless a power of attorney specifically authorizes the agent to act thereunder at the appropriate Center and at all CBP ports, the name of the appropriate Center or each port where the agent is authorized to act thereunder shall be stated in the power of attorney. The power of attorney shall be filed with CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically, in a sufficient number of copies for distribution to the appropriate Center and each port where the agent is to act, unless exempted from filing by § 141.46. The Center director or port director with whom a power of attorney is filed, irrespective of whether his Center or port is named, shall approve it, if it is in the correct form and the provisions of this subpart are complied with, and forward any copies intended for other ports or another Center as appropriate.

[81 FR 93015, Dec. 20, 2016]
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.914 Originating goods. Except as otherwise provided in this subpart and General Note 32(m), HTSUS, a good imported into the customs territory of the United States will be considered an originating good under the PTPA only if: ( a ) The good is wholly obtained or produced entirely in the territory of one or both of the Parties;
( b ) The good is produced entirely in the territory of one or both of the Parties and: ( 1 ) Each non-originating material used in the production of the good undergoes an applicable change in tariff classification specified in General Note 32(n), HTSUS, and the good satisfies all other applicable requirements of General Note 32, HTSUS; or
( 2 ) The good otherwise satisfies any applicable regional value content or other requirements specified in General Note 32(n), HTSUS, and satisfies all other applicable requirements of General Note 32, HTSUS; or
( c ) The good is produced entirely in the territory of one or both of the Parties exclusively from originating materials.
#### § 122.85 Final airport.

When an aircraft enters at the last domestic airport of discharge, the traveling general declaration and manifest shall be filed with Customs and kept at the airport. No abstract general declaration and manifest is required.
### **CHAPTER 8—DEVELOPMENT OF LIGNITE COAL RESOURCES**

Sec.
401.
Establishment of research laboratory; duties.
402.
Acquisition of lands and property; utilization of voluntary services; cooperation with other Federal, State, and private agencies.
403.
Repealed.
404.
Establishment of an advisory committee; composition and appointment.
#### Angelina Laino, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Anthony Laino, Deceased, Appellant, v. Lester W. Auman, Respondent.

No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,

CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

I, Ronald D. Mogel, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of OMNI Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the Periodic Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of OMNI Energy Services
Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: March 31, 2010



/s/    RONALD D.
MOGELRonald D. Mogel Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
§ 175.22 Publication of decisions following petition. ( a ) *Incorrect appraised value, classification, or rate of duty.* If the appraised value of, classification of, or rate of duty upon imported merchandise of the character which is the subject of a petition is found to be incorrect, the Commissioner of Customs shall so inform the petitioner, and shall cause the proper value, classification, or rate of duty to be published in the Federal Register and the weekly Customs Bulletin. Such merchandise entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption after 30 days after the date of publication of such notice to the petitioner in the Customs Bulletin shall be appraised, classified, or assessed as to rate of duty in accordance with the published decision.
( b ) *Correct appraised value, classification, or rate of duty.* If the appraised value of, classification of, or rate of duty upon the imported merchandise which is the subject of the petition is found to be correct, the Commissioner of Customs shall so notify the petitioner, but the decision shall not be published.
### §§61f, 61f–1. Omitted

Section 61f, acts Aug. 5, 1955, ch. 568, 69 Stat. 501; June 27, 1956, ch. 453, 70 Stat. 357; July 1, 1957, Pub. L. 85–75, 71 Stat. 245; July 31, 1958, Pub. L. 85–570, 72 Stat. 440; Aug. 21, 1959, Pub. L. 86–176, 73 Stat. 399; July 12, 1960, Pub. L. 86–628, 74 Stat. 447; Aug. 10, 1961, Pub. L. 87–130, 75 Stat. 321; Oct. 2, 1962, Pub. L. 87–730, 76 Stat. 681; Dec. 30, 1963, Pub. L. 88–248, 77 Stat. 804, prescribed the basic annual compensation of certain clerical, skilled, and unskilled employees in the office of Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of Senate, and was omitted for lack of general applicability.

Section 61f–1, Pub. L. 91–382, Aug. 18, 1970, 84 Stat. 808, authorized Sergeant at Arms to employ certain additional personnel and prescribed their compensation, and was omitted for lack of general applicability.
Certification

I, William J. Dore', Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of March 31, 2004 of Global Industries, Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made know to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

May 7, 2004

                                                                                                                         /S/ WILLIAM J. DORE'

                                                                                                                          William J. Dore'

                                                                                                                          Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of the Application of Samuel M. Brody for Reinstatement as an Attorney.

Motion for reinstatement denied. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### § 190.74 Exportation by mail.

If the merchandise on which drawback is to be claimed is exported by mail or parcel post, the official postal records (original or copies) which describe the mail shipment will be sufficient to prove exportation. The postal record must be identified on the drawback entry, and must be retained by the claimant in their records and made available to CBP upon request (*see* § 190.51(a)).