alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93021, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 151.5 Conditions for examination prior to entry. Examination, sampling, weighing, or operation upon merchandise at the importer's request prior to entry for consumption or warehouse, as provided for in § 151.4 (b) and (c), shall be subject to the following conditions: ( a ) The operation permitted shall be executed under Customs supervision;
( b ) If the merchandise is in possession or joint possession of a carrier or container station operator, the concurrence of such carrier or operator shall be obtained; and
( c ) The Government shall be reimbursed for the compensation, computed in accordance with § 24.17(d) of this chapter, and other expenses of the Customs officer or employee supervising the action permitted.
[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17470, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 95-99, 60 FR 62733, Dec. 7, 1995]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-254

November 30, 1999

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, ON DECEMBER 15-16

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards

(ACRS) has scheduled a meeting of its subcommittee on reliability and probabilistic risk

assessment on December 15-16 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which is open to the public and will start at 8:30 a.m. each day, will be held

in Conference Room T-2B1 of the agency’s Two White Flint North Building at 11545 Rockville

Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

The subcommittee will review the staff’s programs for risk-based analysis of reactor

operating experience. The subcommittee also will review staff efforts regarding risk-informed

technical specifications and associated industry initiatives proposed by the Risk-Informed

Technical Specification Task Force.

Although meetings of the ACRS are open, they are not part of the agency’s normal

hearing process. The ACRS, an advisory committee group to the Commission, conducts

independent, highly technical reviews of safety considerations related to nuclear facilities.

While anyone may attend, the committee will consider only oral or written statements

arranged in advance and limited to specific matters described in a Notice of Meeting published

in an upcoming edition of the Federal Register. ACRS meeting agendas, transcripts, and letter

reports are available on the internet, at http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW

Those seeking information on opportunities to present oral statements or on schedule

changes should contact Mike Markley at 301 415-6885.

###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. III-01-039 July 13, 2001

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH EXELON COMPANY TO DISCUSS SAFETY

PERFORMANCE AT THE QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with Exelon Generation Company officials July

19 to discuss the NRCís annual assessment of safety performance at the Quad Cities Nuclear Station in

Cordova, Illinois.

The meeting will begin at 1 p.m. CDT and will be held at the stationís Training Center, 22712

206th Avenue N. in Cordova. The public is invited to observe the session. NRC officials will be

available afterwards to answer questions.

The annual assessment, referred to as the End-of-Cycle assessment, evaluates safety

performance at the Quad Cities station from April 2000 through March 2001, and informs station

officials of the NRCís plans for future inspections at the facility.

In a letter to Exelon officials addressing the plantís performance, NRC officials said that the

plant had performed safely during the assessment period, but noted that there had been a decline in

performance in some areas. NRC Region III Deputy Administrator James Caldwell will participate in

the July 19 assessment meeting because of that decline in performance which has resulted in increased

NRC oversight, including additional inspections.

The areas for increased NRC inspection efforts included plant security, radiation protection

planning for work during outages, and the availability of certain safety systems. NRC staff members

also met earlier this year with Exelon management to discuss these issues.

The Quad Cities assessment letter and inspection report are available at

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr or from the Region III Public Affairs Office. Current performance

information for the plant is available at http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html.

# # # # #
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23519]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Interactive Advertising Bureau

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Interactive Advertising 
Bureau (``IAB'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) 
the name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Interactive 
Advertising Bureau, New York, NY. The nature and scope of IAB's 
standards development activities are: to develop, promulgate and 
publish voluntary consensus standards for the Internet Advertising 
industry, using procedures that incorporate the attributes of openness, 
balance of interests, due process, and appeals process, and consensus. 
The IAB sets out to organize the industry to set standards and 
guidelines that make Interactive an easier medium for agencies and 
marketers to buy and capture value from advertising.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23519 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-046 July 5, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH ENTERGY NUCLEAR NORTHEAST TO

DISCUSS PERFORMANCE AT INDIAN POINT 3 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Entergy Nuclear

Northeast on Wednesday, July 11, to discuss the results of the agencyís annual assessment of safety

performance at the Indian Point 3 nuclear power plant.

The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, will begin at 1 p.m. in the

Training Center at the plant, located at Broadway and Bleakley Avenue in Buchanan, N.Y. NRC

officials will be available afterwards to informally answer questions from meeting observers.

The performance period to be discussed is April 1, 2000, to March 31, 2001. Overall, the NRC

found that the plant operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and fully met all

cornerstone objectives during the period. A letter sent from the NRC Region I office to Entergy

Nuclear Northeast addresses plant performance during the period and will serve as the basis for the

meeting discussion. It is available on the NRC web site at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr/ip3_eoc2001.pdf.

Current performance information for Indian Point 3 is available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/IP3/ip3_chart.html.

###
S. 789 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two 

An Act 

To repeal certain obsolete laws relating to Indians. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Repealing Existing Substandard 

Provisions Encouraging Conciliation with Tribes Act’’ or the 

‘‘RESPECT Act’’. 

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CERTAIN OBSOLETE LAWS RELATING TO INDIANS. 

(1) Section 2080 of the Revised Statutes (25 U.S.C. 72) 

is repealed. 

(2) Section 2100 of the Revised Statutes (25 U.S.C. 127) 

is repealed. 

(3) Section 2 of the Act of March 3, 1875 (18 Stat. 449, 

chapter 132; 25 U.S.C. 128), is repealed. 

(4) The first section of the Act of March 3, 1875 (18 Stat. 

424, chapter 132; 25 U.S.C. 129), is amended under the heading 

‘‘CHEYENNES AND ARAPAHOES.’’ by striking ‘‘; that the 

Secretary of the Interior be authorized to withhold, from any 

tribe of Indians who may hold any captives other than Indians, 

any moneys due them from the United States until said captives 

shall be surrendered to the lawful authorities of the United 

States’’. 

(5) Section 2087 of the Revised Statutes (25 U.S.C. 130) 

is repealed. 

(6) Section 3 of the Act of March 3, 1875 (18 Stat. 449, 

chapter 132; 25 U.S.C. 137), is repealed. 

(7) Section 2101 of the Revised Statutes (25 U.S.C. 138) 

is repealed. 

(8) Section 7 of the Act of June 23, 1879 (21 Stat. 35, 

chapter 35; 25 U.S.C. 273), is repealed. 

(9) The first section of the Act of March 3, 1893 (27 Stat. 

612, chapter 209), is amended— 

(A) under the heading ‘‘MISCELLANEOUS SUPPORTS.’’ (27 Stat. 628; 25 U.S.C. 283), by striking the 

last 2 undesignated paragraphs; and 

(B) under the heading ‘‘FOR SUPPORT OF 

SCHOOLS.’’ (27 Stat. 635; 25 U.S.C. 283), by striking the 

second undesignated paragraph. 

(10) Section 18 of the Act of June 30, 1913 (38 Stat. 

96, chapter 4; 25 U.S.C. 285), is amended by striking the 

tenth undesignated paragraph. 
S. 789—2 

(11) The Act of June 21, 1906 (34 Stat. 325, chapter 3504), 

is amended under the heading ‘‘COMMISSIONER.’’ under the 

heading ‘‘I. GENERAL PROVISIONS.’’ (34 Stat. 328; 25 U.S.C. 

302) by striking the fourth undesignated paragraph. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group, Function, Integration, and Rehabilitation Sciences Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         November 1-2, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Holiday Inn Select Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Anne Krey, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6908,                         *ak41o@nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 6, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-22993 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
### §6653. Postage allowance for Chaplain of Senate

The Secretary of the Senate is authorized and directed to procure and furnish each fiscal year (commencing with the fiscal year ending September 30, 1982) to the Chaplain of the Senate, upon the request of the Chaplain of the Senate, United States postage stamps in such amounts as may be necessary for the mailing of postal matters arising in connection with his official business.

(Pub. L. 97–51, §127(b)(1), Oct. 1, 1981, 95 Stat. 966.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 61d–2 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-99-13 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Thursday, April 1, 1999)

NRC FINDS PERFORMANCE ‘ACCEPTABLE’

AT CRYSTAL RIVER IN LATEST REVIEW

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has found that safety performance

remains acceptable in the NRC’s latest plant performance review at the Crystal River

nuclear power plant, operated by Florida Power Corporation near Crystal River, Florida.

In a letter to FPC, NRC official Leonard Wert said overall performance was

acceptable and “management maintained high performance standards.” Wert said

operations and engineering performance were both improving, and “areas for additional

improvement continued to be identified and are being addressed.”

The text of the plant performance review letter is available from the NRC Region

II Office of Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr.

NRC reviews safety performance twice a year at every licensed nuclear power

plant in the nation. These reviews give the agency staff an integrated assessment of

plant performance and provide a basis for planning inspection activities.

Plant performance reviews are being used as an interim measure to monitor

nuclear power plant safety. The agency began using it for this purpose after

suspending the Systematic Assessment of License Performance (SALP) process until a

new assessment program is developed. Previously, SALP reports were issued every

12 to 24 months.

The new reactor oversight and assessment program being developed will

provide quarterly performance reports, based on a number of performance indicators

and on inspection findings. This program will be tested at eight sites beginning in June

and will be extended to all plants next January. A full description of the new program is

available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

#
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2004, of Synagro Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert C. Boucher, Jr., certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company and that the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                     /s/ Robert C. Boucher, Jr.
                                     -----------------------------------
                                     Robert C. Boucher, Jr.
                                     November 5, 2004
#### In the Matter of Louis Mizrahi et al., Petitioners, against John F. O’Connell et al., Constituting the State Liquor Authority, Respondents.

Determination unanimously confirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present— Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Scanz Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff,

v.

JewMon Enterprises, LLC and 

others, Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 20-22957-Civ-Scola

Order Administratively Closing Case upon Notice of Settlement

The parties have settled this action. (ECF No. 172.) By August 9, 2021,

the Plaintiff must file a stipulation of dismissal, under Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), or a motion to dismiss, consistent with Rule 41(a)(2).

The Court will administratively close this case in the meantime.

If the Plaintiff files a stipulation of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 

the parties wish to have this Court retain jurisdiction to enforce any settlement 

agreement, the stipulation of dismissal must include the following sentence:

“The effectiveness of this stipulation of dismissal is conditioned upon the 

Court’s entry of an order retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the 

parties’ settlement agreement.” This sentence is necessary because a 

stipulation of dismissal is otherwise self-executing and deprives the Court of 

jurisdiction to do anything further. See Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 

677 F.3d 1272, 1280 (11th Cir. 2012).

The Court directs the Clerk to close this case. Any party may move to reopen the case if there is a problem in reaching a final settlement agreement.

Any pending motions are denied as moot.

Done and ordered in Miami, Florida, on July 12, 2021.

________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-22957-RNS Document 173 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2021 Page 1 of 1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bandele M. JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-6352.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 28, 2002.

Bandele M. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Bandele M. Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief in his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. *See United States v. Jones,*Nos. CR-95-51; CA-02-1 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 6, 2002). Additionally, we deny Jones’ motions to proceed in forma pauperis, to amend the record, and for oral argument, which we dispense with because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
###### Editorial Note on Part 152

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 152 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93022, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 152.23 Merchandise imported from intermediate countries.

Merchandise imported from one country, being the growth, production, or manufacture of another country, shall for value purposes (see sections 402, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended; 19 U.S.C. 1401a) be treated as an exportation of the country from which it is immediately imported. However, if it appears by the invoice, bill of lading, or other evidence that the merchandise was destined for the United States at the time of original shipment, it shall be treated as an exportation of the country from which it was originally exported. The term “country” is to be regarded for the purposes of this section as embracing all the possessions of a nation, however widely separated, which are subject to the same supreme executive and legislative authority and control.

[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17477, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 87-89, 52 FR 24446, July 1, 1987]