alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM WYMAN PARK
BANCORPORATION, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         310,442
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         474,358
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,301,106
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         174,086
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           176,350
<LOANS>                                     65,223,905
<ALLOWANCE>                                  (285,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              68,839,614
<DEPOSITS>                                  55,347,064
<SHORT-TERM>                                 3,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,885,314
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,117
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,597,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              68,839,614
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,513,841
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               12,744
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               252,473
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,779,058
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,550,106
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,617,543
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,161,515
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  (2,400)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,557,367
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                713,708
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     713,708
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   435,687
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .563
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .541
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.25
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   277,513
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             (282,600)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            (285,000)
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         (285,000)
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION OF  CFO PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Industries, Ltd. ("Global") on Form10-Q for the quarter ending
June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on
August 6, 2004 (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
SS 1350 as adopted pursuant to SS 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge based upon a review of the Report, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global as of the dates and for periods presented as required by such Report.





/S/ TIMOTHY W. MICIOTTOTimothy W. MiciottoChief Financial OfficerAugust 6, 2004


This certification is provided pursuant to
SS 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Global or the certifying officer for purposes of
SS 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by
SS 906 has been provided to Global  and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23869]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property 
at the City-County Airport, Madras, OR

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of request to release airport property.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invite public comment on the 
release of land at City-County Airport under the provisions of Section 
125 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment Reform Act for the 21st 
Century (AIR 21), now 49 U.S.C. 47107(h)(2).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 26, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to 
the FAA at the following address: Mr. J. Wade Bryant, Manager, Federal 
Aviation Administration, Northwest Mountain Region, Airports Division, 
Seattle Airports District Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Suite 250, 
Renton, Washington 98055-4056.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to The Honorable Rick Allen, Mayor of City of 
Madras, at the following address: The Honorable Rick Allen, Mayor, City 
of Madras, 71 SE D Street, Madras, OR 97741.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. William L. Watson, OR/ID Section 
Supervisor, Federal Aviation Administration, Northwest Mountain Region, 
Seattle Airports District Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Suite 250, 
Renton, Washington 98055-4056.
    The request to release property may be reviewed, by appointment, in 
person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the 
request to release property at the City-County Airport under the 
provisions of the AIR 21 (49 U.S.C. 47107(h)(2)).
    On October 15, 2004, the FAA determined that the request to release 
property at City-County Airport submitted by the airport meets the 
procedural requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration. The FAA 
may approve the request, in whole or in part, no later than November 
26, 2004.
    The following is a brief overview of the request:
    City-County Airport is proposing the release of approximately 2.24 
acres of airport property so the property can be sold to the businesses 
wishing to locate in the airport industrial park. The revenue made from 
this sale will be used toward Airport Capital Improvement.
    Any person may inspect, by appointment, the request in person at 
the FAA office listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon appointment and request, inspect 
the application, notice and other documents germane to the application 
in person at City-County Airport.

    Issued in Renton, Washington on October 15, 2004.
J. Wade Bryant,
Manager, Seattle Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 04-23869 Filed 10-25-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
              (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
                            of Title 18, United Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Ener1, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief, that:

(1)      The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
         2003 (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the
         requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:  May 20, 2003                        /s/ Mead M. McCabe
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Mead M. McCabe
                                            Chief Financial Officer
### §1536. Assistance to Congressional Budget Office

The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall—

(1) collect from agencies the statements prepared under section 1532 of this title; and

(2) periodically forward copies of such statements to the Director of the Congressional Budget Office on a reasonably timely basis after promulgation of the general notice of proposed rulemaking or of the final rule for which the statement was prepared.

(Pub. L. 104–4, title II, §206, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 66.)
§ 115.42 Approval plates. ( a ) The owner or operator applicant shall, upon receipt of a certificate of approval from the Certifying Authority, affix an approval plate in the manner specified for containers approved by design type (see § 115.32).
( b ) Although an entry is not required in the space provided for type identifiers on an approval plate for containers approved after manufacture, identification number and letters indicating that a series of containers comply with the same specifications may be placed in such space. This may be used to assist in the identification of a series of containers in which a common defect may be discovered subsequent to certification. In such case the approval number on the plate shall be altered by an addition to the second or third element of such number. The specific method of altering the approval number may be established by each Certifying Authority, for containers approved by it, and communicated to the U.S. Customs Service.
( c ) Two possible methods of accomplishing this are: ( 1 ) Placing an “X” in front of the numeric portion of the middle element of the approval number, e.g., USA/X123-IB/85.
( 2 ) Placing a suffix at the end of the approval number, e.g, USA/123-AB/85-01.
###### Editorial Note on Part 181

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 181 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93026, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 181.81 Applicability to NAFTA transactions.

Except as otherwise provided in § 181.82 of this part, all criminal, civil or administrative penalties which may be imposed on U.S. importers, exporters and producers for violations of the Customs and related laws and regulations shall also apply to U.S. importers, exporters and producers for violations of the laws and regulations relating to the NAFTA.
#### § 12.9 Release for final delivery to consignee.

No meat, meat-food products, or animal casings shall be released for final delivery to the consignee until the port director is advised by the Department of Agriculture, or its representative, that the merchandise is admissible.
### §1006. Acreage limitations

A geothermal lease shall embrace a reasonably compact area of not more than 5,120 acres, except where a departure therefrom is occasioned by an irregular subdivision or subdivisions. No person, association, or corporation, except as otherwise provided in this chapter, shall take, hold, own, or control at one time, whether acquired directly from the Secretary under this chapter or otherwise, any direct or indirect interest in Federal geothermal leases in any one State exceeding 51,200 acres, including leases acquired under the provisions of section 1003 of this title.

(Pub. L. 91–581, §7, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1569; Pub. L. 109–58, title II, §235, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 671.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2005—Pub. L. 109–58 inserted section catchline, substituted "5,120 acres" for "two thousand five hundred and sixty acres" and "51,200 acres" for "twenty thousand four hundred and eighty acres" in text, and struck out second par. which read as follows: "At any time after fifteen years from December 24, 1970, the Secretary, after public hearings, may increase this maximum holding in any one State by regulation, not to exceed fifty-one thousand two hundred acres."
§ 18.2 Carriers, cartmen, and lightermen. ( a ) *Transportation of merchandise in-bond by bonded carriers* — ( 1 ) *Generally.* Except as provided for in paragraph (b) of this section, merchandise to be transported from one port to another in the United States in-bond must be delivered to a common carrier, contract carrier, freight forwarder, or private carrier, each of which must be bonded for that purpose. Such merchandise delivered to a bonded common carrier, contract carrier, or freight forwarder may be transported with the use of facilities of other bonded or non-bonded carriers; however, the responsibility for the merchandise will remain with the common carrier, contract carrier, or freight forwarder that obligated its bond for that purpose. Only vessels entitled to engage in the coastwise trade (see § 4.80 of this chapter) will be entitled to transport merchandise under this section.
( 2 ) *Merchandise transported under a TIR carnet.* Merchandise to be transported from one port to another in the United States under cover of a TIR carnet (see part 114 of this chapter), except merchandise not otherwise subject to CBP control, as provided in §§ 18.41 through 18.45, must be delivered to a common carrier or contract carrier bonded for that purpose, but the merchandise thereafter may be transported with the use of other bonded or non-bonded common or contract carriers. The TIR carnet will be responsible for liability incurred in the carriage of merchandise under the carnet, and the carrier's bond will be responsible as provided in § 114.22(c) of this chapter.
( 3 ) *Merchandise transported under an A.T.A. or a TECRO/AIT carnet.* Merchandise to be transported from one port to another in the United States under cover of an A.T.A. or TECRO/AIT carnet (see part 114 of this chapter) must be delivered to a common carrier or contract carrier bonded for that purpose, but the merchandise thereafter may be transported with the use of other bonded or non-bonded common or contract carriers. The A.T.A. or TECRO/AIT carnet will be responsible for liability incurred in the carriage of merchandise under the carnet, and the carrier's bond will be responsible as provided in § 114.22(d) of this chapter.
( b ) *Transportation of merchandise in-bond between certain ports by bonded cartmen or lighterman.* Pursuant to Public Resolution 108, of June 19, 1936, (19 U.S.C. 1551, 1551a) and subject to compliance with all other applicable provisions of this part, CBP, upon the request of a party named in § 18.1(c), may permit merchandise that has been entered and subject to CBP examination to be transported in-bond between the ports of New York, Newark, and Perth Amboy, by bonded cartmen or lightermen duly qualified in accordance with the provisions of part 112 of this chapter, if CBP is satisfied that the transportation of such merchandise in this manner will not endanger the revenue and does not pose a risk to health, safety or security.
#### § 12.115 Release under bond of shipment detained for examination.

If the EPA so directs, a shipment of pesticides or devices will be detained at the importer's risk and expense by the port director pending an examination by the Administrator to determine whether the shipment complies with the requirements of the Act. However, a shipment detained for examination may be released to the consignee prior to a determination by the Administrator provided a bond is furnished on CBP Form 301, or its electronic equivalent, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.62 of this chapter, for the return of the merchandise to CBP custody, and upon entry of the merchandise and the satisfaction of all other applicable laws. The bond will be in an amount deemed appropriate by CBP. When a shipment of pesticides or devices is released to the consignee under bond, the pesticides or devices must not be used or otherwise disposed of until the determination on compliance with the requirements of the Act is made by the Administrator.

[CBP Dec. 16-15, 81 FR 67143, Sept. 30, 2016]
EPA DRAFT ASSESSMENT OF FORMALDEHYDE: 

COMMENTS FROM THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL 

SAFETY AND HEALTH 

NIOSH appreciates the opportunity to review and provide comments for 

the draft IRIS Formaldehyde Toxicological Review for Interagency Science 

Consultation. Given that NIOSH has not performed a study or 

assessments recently that are not discussed in the EPA risk assessment, 

our comments are confined to commenting on whether EPA has asked the 

appropriate questions in the charge to the NAS reviewers. NIOSH defers 

to the NAS assess some of the scientific issues raised by the draft 

assessment. 

In the draft risk assessment charge to reviewers, the treatment of the 

biologically-based modeling of the toxicological data for formaldehyde 

appears to be an area of significant interest, and one for which EPA is 

seeking reviewers’ attention. In particular, it is appropriate to see a 

reference to the issue in the last sentence of the charge questions “... 

please consider the analysis of the sensitivity of low-dose estimates of 

potential biologically-based dose-response models of formaldehyde upper 

respiratory tract cancer to small changes in model design or model 

inputs.” This was the basis that EPA used to reject the conclusions of a 

published biologically-based model, so it implies that the reviewers should 

take a look at the ensuing controversy and weigh in on it. 

The other significant area requiring consideration is in the interpretation of 

the epidemiological data for formaldehyde, particularly the treatment of 

lymphohematopoietic tumors, which have not been associated with 

formaldehyde exposures in the toxicological studies. This drives the 

largest part of the cancer risk in the epidemiological analysis, so it’s 

important to determine whether or not the analysis is adequate. EPA gets 

at this in a very general and indirect way: “The draft uses as its preferred 

quantitative estimates dose-response relationships between several 

cancers and cumulative inhalation exposure to formaldehyde. Please 

review and comment on the scientific support for the choices made in 

developing those estimates.” While this is adequate, EPA might consider 

a slightly more focused question, specifically addressing the 

lymphohematopoietic tumors.
EXHIBIT
32.2

Certification
of Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Adi Raviv,
Chief Financial  Officer of U.S. Wireless Data, Inc.,  hereby certify,  to my knowledge,
that the quarterly report on Form  10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 of U.S.
Wireless Data,  Inc. (the Form 10-QSB)  fully complies with the  requirements
of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and the  information
contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly  presents,  in  all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of U.S. Wireless Data, Inc.

Dated: November
13, 2003

| | /s/
Adi Raviv
Adi Raviv
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial
Officer)
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
§ 148.61 Status as crewmembers. The following persons arriving in the United States shall not be treated as crewmembers: ( a ) Members of the uniformed services of the United States and persons in the civil service of the United States engaged in the operation of a vessel, vehicle, or aircraft owned by, or under the complete control and management of, the United States or any of its agencies.
( b ) Persons engaged in the operation of a private or public aircraft.
( c ) Persons not connected with the operation, navigation, ownership, or business of a vessel, vehicle or aircraft engaged in international traffic.
[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. 76-338, 41 FR 54167, Dec. 13, 1976]
Wakhan Cor

Herat

Tora Bora Mountains

Kabul

Lashkar Gah

N

BagramBamyan

Afghanistan fro

NASA Astronau

December 31, 

Photo courtesy of the Image Analysis Laboratory NASA Johnson Space Center http://eol.jsc.nasa.govImage ID# ISS006E16015Photo annotated by Dan Miller USAID/Afghanistan

Mazar-e-SharifBaghlan

Faizabad
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-01-006 February 9, 2001

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC SPECIAL INSPECTION TEAM TO DISCUSS

FINDINGS WITH SUMMER PLANT OFFICIALS

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Special Inspection Team will hold a brief exit meeting with

South Carolina Electric & Gas Company at the Summer nuclear plant near Jenkinsville, South

Carolina, on Thursday, February 15, at 11:00 a.m. The NRC team will discuss their inspection

findings after reviewing a flawed reactor cooling water pipe weld at the plant, and the company’s

repairs to that weld.

The meeting is open to observation by the public, and NRC officials will be available at its

conclusion to answer any questions from interested observers. The NRC team will also issue a written

report, which will be available to the public, in several weeks.

After the plant shut down for a scheduled refueling outage in early October, employees noticed

traces of boron, a neutron absorber used to moderate the plant’s nuclear chain reaction, beneath a large

pipe inside the containment building. This indicated leaking or “weeping” of reactor cooling water

containing the boron from the area of the pipe. Subsequent tests indicated a crack in a weld and that

section of the pipe was removed for further tests. The repairs have involved replacing that section of

pipe and welding the new piece in place.

The four-person NRC team has observed the company’s initial investigation, tests conducted

on the original weld, repair activities and tests conducted to confirm the adequacy of the repairs.

###