alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r 

### 136639 Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136639 COA: 280143 Oakland CC: 98-163897-FC LAMONT HEARD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 25, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0915 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 22, 2008

Clerk
### §1255. State laws

(a) No State law or regulation in effect on August 3, 1977, or which may become effective thereafter, shall be superseded by any provision of this chapter or any regulation issued pursuant thereto, except insofar as such State law or regulation is inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter.

(b) Any provision of any State law or regulation in effect upon August 3, 1977, or which may become effective thereafter, which provides for more stringent land use and environmental controls and regulations of surface coal mining and reclamation operation than do the provisions of this chapter or any regulation issued pursuant thereto shall not be construed to be inconsistent with this chapter. The Secretary shall set forth any State law or regulation which is construed to be inconsistent with this chapter. Any provision of any State law or regulation in effect on August 3, 1977, or which may become effective thereafter, which provides for the control and regulation of surface mining and reclamation operations for which no provision is contained in this chapter shall not be construed to be inconsistent with this chapter.

(Pub. L. 95–87, title V, §505, Aug. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 473.)
### §104f. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 104f was editorially reclassified as section 4728 of this title.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 822 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require program participation 

agreements between institutions of higher education and Hanban if a 

Confucius Institute operates on the campus of the institution. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 18, 2021 

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. TUBERVILLE, Mr. 

BRAUN, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, and Mr. TILLIS) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require 

program participation agreements between institutions of 

higher education and Hanban if a Confucius Institute 

operates on the campus of the institution. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transparency for Con5 fucius Institutes Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 822 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROGRAM PARTICIPATION AGREEMENTS BETWEEN 

2 INSTITUTIONS AND HANBAN. 

3 Section 487(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

4 (20 U.S.C. 1094(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(30) If a Confucius Institute (as defined in 

7 section 1091 of the John S. McCain National De8 fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (132 

9 Stat. 1997; Public Law 115–232)) operates on the 

10 campus of the institution, the institution shall enter 

11 into a program participation agreement with the Of12 fice of Chinese Language Council International 

13 (commonly known as ‘Hanban’) that— 

14 ‘‘(A) clearly delineates between the Confu15 cius Institute’s programs and the institution’s 

16 own Chinese language programs; 

17 ‘‘(B) locates the Confucius Institute phys18 ically apart from the Chinese language pro19 grams, Chinese history programs, and Chinese 

20 cultural programs within the institution’s orga21 nizational structure and separates promotions 

22 for the Confucius Institute from promotions for 

23 the institution’s Chinese language programs, 

24 Chinese history programs, and Chinese cultural 

25 programs; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 822 IS

1 ‘‘(C) removes the Chinese assistant direc2 tor position from the Confucius Institute; 

3 ‘‘(D) subjects the staff and professors of 

4 the Confucius Institute to appropriate back5 ground checks; 

6 ‘‘(E) is publicly available in its entirety on7 line; 

8 ‘‘(F) does not have a confidentiality sec9 tion; and 

10 ‘‘(G) provides that the institution has final 

11 decision-making authority, including with re12 gard to conference themes, guest speakers, and 

13 topics for events on campus at the institution.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-02-0138 - Denial of Petition for Rulemaking on Mandatory Submittal of Performance Indicator Information Needed for the Reactor Oversight Process (PRM-50-72)

Accession Number: ML021820150

Date Released: Friday, September 20, 2002

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML021820125 - SECY-02-0138 - Denial of Petition for Rulemaking on Mandatory Submittal of Performance Indicator Information Needed for the Reactor Oversight Process (PRM-50-72) (3 page(s), 7/22/2002)
    - ML021820186 - SECY-02-0138-Attachment 1-Proposed Rule on - Denial of Petition for Rulemaking on Mandatory Submittal of Performance Indicator Information Needed for the Reactor Oversight Process (PRM-50-72) (5 page(s), 7/22/2002)
    - ML021820271 - SECY-02-0138-Attachment 2- Petition for Rulemaking Ltr to Mr. D. Lochbaum, re: Petition for Rulemaking on Mandatory Submittal of Performance Indicator (PI) Information Needed for the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP); PRM-50-72 (2 page(s), 7/22/2002)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert Glaser, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, as amended by this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A, of RealNetworks, Inc.; and


2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: April 27, 2018








/s/ Robert Glaser


Robert Glaser


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93021, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 151.4 Time of examination. Imported merchandise shall not be opened, examined, or inspected until it has been entered under some form of entry for consumption or warehouse, except in the following cases: ( a ) *Official Government examination and sampling.* Authorized employees of the Customs Service, Food and Drug Administration, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Public Health Service, or other Government agency may for official purposes examine or take samples of merchandise for which entry has not been filed, including merchandise being released under a special permit for immediate delivery.
( b ) *Perishable merchandise, benzenoid chemicals, and merchandise received without an invoice.* An application by the importer to examine merchandise, whether or not covered by an entry for transportation in bond or for exportation, may be granted by the port director, under the conditions listed in § 151.5, in the following cases: ( 1 ) Examination of perishable merchandise is desired solely to determine its condition. This is not limited to a single examination, and there is no objection to incidental display to prospective buyers during the examination.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( 3 ) The importer has been unable to obtain the required documents or information to make the necessary entry, and examination of the merchandise is required to obtain information for the preparation of a pro forma invoice to be used in making entry.
( c ) *Examination of merchandise entered for transportation under bond or for exportation* — ( 1 ) *Examination, sampling, weighing or emergency operation.* As a bona fide incident to exportation or further transportation, the importer of merchandise entered or withdrawn for transportation under bond or for exportation may, upon written application to the port director supported by a valid business reason for the request, be permitted to examine, sample, weigh, or subject his merchandise to an operation required by reason of an emergency, provided that any operation performed on the merchandise does not constitute a manufacture, and that § 151.5 is complied with. For conditions governing transshipment and emergency access to the shipment by the carrier, see § 18.3 of this chapter.
( 2 ) *Nonemergency operation.* In cases not involving an emergency, an operation not constituting a manufacture may be permitted under the conditions listed in paragraph (c)(1) of this section if neither the protection of the revenue nor the proper conduct of Customs business requires that the operation be done in a Customs bonded warehouse, provided that the importer's written application for such operation is approved by the port director.
[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17470, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 95-99, 60 FR 62733, Dec. 7, 1995; T.D. 97-82, 62 FR 51771, Oct. 3, 1997]
International Water Conference 2014 

## Pilot Background  

## FGD Water Quality  

## High Level Results  

## Summary 

## Began Pilots in June 2013  

## Scrubber out of service all of December, 2013  

## Scrubber controls adjusted in early January, 2014  

## Pilots ended April 4, 2014.

Contaminant of Concern Proposed ELG

Limits (Daily Max/Avg) FGD Characteristics As 8/6 ppb 2 - 3 ppb Hg 0.242/0.119 ppb 15 - 300 ppb Se 16/10 ppb 600 - 2,700 ppb NO 3 /NO2 0.17/0.13 ppm 50 - 70 mg/L 

## Higher Scrubber ORP increases concentration of Se, Hg, and maybe NO3 -N  

## Higher ORP results in lower pH  

## Higher ORP results in more oxidants in FGD  

## Highly oxidized FGD is transient  

## Oxidized MnO2 

## catalyzes the Se oxidation  

## FGD WQ variations will impact all treatment technologies  

## Important to pay attention to scrubber ORP 

## Biological Systems ◦ AnMBR (ADI) ◦ FBR/MBR (Envirogen) 

### ◦ ABMet (GE)  

## Chemical Systems (ZVI based) ◦ Pironox (Evoqua) 

### ◦ ZVI Blue (Liberty Hydro) 

### Biological Systems ◦ All performed similarly but did not meet proposed ELG Se limits ◦ High oxidants likely interfered with Se removal ◦ Nitrates removed well, convert to N 2 gas ◦ Generally good metals removal  

### Chemical ◦ Difficulty with Se removal ◦ Se removal improved with lower NO 3 concentrations ◦ NO 3 in and NH 3 out, both problems ◦ Pironox remove Hg relatively well ◦ Generally good metals removal

## Joe Chwirka, P.E. Tetra Tech Cell: 505 -218- 1246 email: joe.chwirka@tetratech.com
### §61h–7. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 61h–7 was editorially reclassified as section 6133 of this title.
<PAGE>

DEARBORN BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q (continued)

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and accompanies the quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q")
of Dearborn Bancorp, Inc. (the "Issuer").

         I, Jeffrey L. Karafa, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Issuer, certify that:

         (i)      The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                  (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)     The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Issuer.



Dated: November 12, 2002
                                                  /s/ Jeffrey L. Karafa
                                             ------------------------------
                                                    Jeffrey L. Karafa
                                          Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer,
                                                  Dearborn Bancorp, Inc.
#### § 190.73 Electronic proof of exportation.

Records kept through an electronic export system of the United States Government may be presented as actual proof of exportation only if CBP has officially approved the use of that electronic export system as proof of compliance for drawback claims. Official approval will be published as a general notice in the Customs Bulletin.
§ 333.2 Program eligibility. ( a ) Certain programs to promote the national defense are eligible for priorities and allocations support. These include programs for military and energy production or construction, military or critical infrastructure assistance to any foreign nation, deployment and sustainment of military forces, homeland security, stockpiling, space, and any directly related activity. Other eligible programs include emergency preparedness activities conducted pursuant to Title VI of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5195 *et seq.*) and critical infrastructure protection and restoration. For a current and complete list reflecting the latest changes to approved programs, please visit FEMA's website at *www.FEMA.gov .*
( b ) FEMA may delegate authority to place priority ratings on contracts or orders necessary to promote the national defense to appropriate officials in certain Federal Government agencies that issue such contracts or orders, to the extent consistent with the delegation of Presidential authority under which FEMA is operating. Such delegations may include authority to authorize recipients of rated orders to place ratings on contracts or orders to contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers.
#### Philip Federman, Appellant, v. Carl Rieger, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ,
#### § 191.181 Drawback allowance.

The fourth proviso of § 3 of the Foreign Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81c), provides for drawback on merchandise transferred to a foreign trade zone for the sole purpose of exportation, storage or destruction (except destruction of distilled spirits, wines, and fermented malt liquors), provided there is compliance with the regulations of this subpart.
§ 146.70 Transfer of zone-restricted merchandise into Customs territory. ( a ) *General.* Zone-restricted merchandise may be transferred to Customs territory only for entry for exportation, for entry for transportation and exportation, for warehousing pending exportation, for destruction (except destruction of distilled spirits, wines and fermented malt liquors), for transfer from one zone to another, or for delivery to a qualified vessel or aircraft or as ground equipment of a qualified aircraft under section 309 or 317, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1309, 1317), unless the Board has ruled that the return of the merchandise to Customs territory for domestic consumption is in the public interest. With Board approval (See 15 CFR part 400), that merchandise may be entered for consumption, for warehousing, for immediate transportation without appraisement, or under any other provision of the Customs laws, unless the Board has specified the form of entry to be made.
( b ) *For consumption.* If the return of zone-restricted merchandise to Customs territory for consumption has been ruled by the Board to be in the public interest, the entry shall be endorsed by the port director to show the authority under which it was made, and that the merchandise is subject to the provisions of Chapter 98, Subchapter I, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202).
( c ) *For warehousing.* Zone-restricted merchandise may be transferred from a zone to a Customs bonded warehouse for storage pending exportation. The Customs Form 7501, or its electronic equivalent, shall be endorsed by the port director to show that the merchandise may not be withdrawn for consumption. In the case of zone-restricted merchandise transported in bond to another port for warehousing and exportation, Customs Form 7512 shall be endorsed by the port director to show that the merchandise is foreign trade zone merchandise in zone-restricted status, which shall be entered for warehouse with proper endorsement on Customs Form 7501, and which may not be withdrawn for consumption. Zone-restricted merchandise transferred from a zone to a Customs bonded warehouse may not be manipulated, except for packing or unpacking incidental to exportation.
( d ) *For other purposes.* Upon acceptance of an entry or withdrawal for zone-restricted merchandise for any purpose other than that described in a Board order, the entry shall be endorsed by the person making entry to show that actual exportation of the merchandise is required by the fourth proviso to section 3 of the Act, as amended, or the entry endorsed to require delivery to a qualified vessel or aircraft, under section 309 or 317, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1309, 1317).
[T.D. 86-16, 51 FR 5049, Feb. 11, 1986, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51263, Dec. 21, 1988; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61291, Oct. 13, 2015]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. III-02-033 June 6, 2002

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO HOLD THREE PUBLIC MEETINGS ON DAVIS-BESSE JUNE 12

IN OHIO

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will conduct three public meetings to discuss the

agency’s activities associated with the corrosion damage to the reactor vessel head at the DavisBesse Nuclear Power Plant on Wednesday, June 12, at 10 a.m., 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. in Oak Harbor,

Ohio.

All three meetings will be held at the Oak Harbor High School Auditorium, 11661 West

State Route 163, in Oak Harbor.

The first meeting, at 10 a.m., will focus on the activities of the Davis-Besse Reactor

Vessel Head Degradation Lessons Learned Task Force. It will conduct an independent evaluation

of the NRC staff’s regulatory processes related to assuring reactor vessel head integrity in order

to identify and recommend areas for improvement. The purpose of the meeting is to introduce the

Task Force, its objectives, the scope of its activities and its schedule; to answer questions, and to

address public comments. 

The 3 p.m. meeting will be between the NRC oversight panel, set up to coordinate the

agency’s activities associated with the corrosion damage to the reactor vessel head, and utility

officials. The public is invited to observe the business portion of the meeting; and will have an

opportunity to ask questions of the NRC staff before the meeting is adjourned.

The NRC will hold a separate public meeting at 7 p.m. to update the public on NRC’s

activities related to the reactor vessel head degradation. The public will be encouraged to ask

questions and make comments. 

The Lessons Learned Task Force, assigned by the NRC’s Executive Director of

Operations to assess lessons-learned related to the degradation of the reactor vessel head at

Davis-Besse, is headed by Arthur T. Howell, III, Director of the Division of Reactor Safety in

NRC’s Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas. It includes specialists from Region IV as well as

the NRC’s Region II Office in Atlanta, Georgia; Office of Nuclear Materials Safety &
Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, and Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

Representatives from the state of Ohio are also participating as observers in the task force review

activities.

The NRC oversight panel, created on April 29, includes NRC management personnel and

staff from its Region III office in Lisle, Illinois, the NRC Headquarters office in Rockville,

Maryland, and the NRC Resident Inspector Office at the Davis-Besse site.

Documents on the Davis-Besse corrosion issue, including further details on NRC’s

oversight panel activities and the lessons learned task force, are posted on the NRC’s web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/vessel-head-degradation.html.

# # #
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23885]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Force Protection in 
Urban and Unconventional Environments will meet in closed session on 
October 27-28, 2004, at Strategic Analysis, Inc., 3601 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA. This Task Force will review and evaluate 
force protection capabilities in urban and unconventional environments 
and provide recommendations to effect change to the future Joint Force.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. Specifically, 
the Task Force's foci will be to evaluate force protection in the 
context of post major combat operations that have been conducted in 
Iraq and Afghanistan. In the operations, loss of national treasure--
military and civilian, U.S. and other nations--has resulted from 
actions executed by non-state and rogue actors. The threat and 
capabilities these insurgent, terrorist and criminal actions present 
pose a most serious challenge to our ability to achieve unified action.
    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. 2), it has been 
determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, these 
meetings will be closed to the public.
    Due to scheduling difficulties, there is insufficient time to 
provide timely notice required by section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act and Subsection 101-6.1015(b) of the GSA Final 
Rule on Federal Advisory Committee Management, 41 CFR part 101-6, which 
further requires publication at least 15 calendar days prior to the 
meeting.

    Dated: October 20, 2004.
Linda Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-23885 Filed 10-25-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
#### § 112.46 Report of loss or theft.

The loss or theft of an identification card shall be promptly reported by the cardholder to the port director.