alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1
 Subsidiaries of RealNetworks, Inc.
 Name of Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationAtrativa Latin America Ltda.
    
    BrazilAudio Mill, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaBeijing RealNetworks Technology Co. Ltd.
    
    ChinaExomi América Latina Industria, Comércio E Serviços LTDA
    
    BrazilGame Trust, Inc.
    
    DelawareHiFind Systems AG
    
    GermanyListen.com, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaMr. Goodliving Ltd.
    
    FinlandPT WiderThan Indonesia
    
    IndonesiaRealNetworks ApS (formerly Game Trust Europe ApS)
    
    DenmarkRealNetworks Asia Pacific Co., Ltd. (formerly
WiderThan Co., Ltd.)
    
    Republic of KoreaRealNetworks Australia Pty. Limited
    
    AustraliaRealNetworks Digital Music of California, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaRealNetworks Dijital Medya Yazilim Limited Sirketi
    
    TurkeyRealNetworks E-Commerce LLC
    
    DelawareRealNetworks Global, Inc.
    
    DelawareRealNetworks GmbH
    
    GermanyRealNetworks GmbH (formerly Sony NetServices GmbH)
    
    AustriaRealNetworks Home Entertainment, Inc.
    
    DelawareRealNetworks Hong Kong, Limited
    
    Hong KongRealNetworks India Pvt. Ltd.
    
    IndiaRealNetworks International SARL
    
    LuxembourgRealNetworks Investments LLC
    
    DelawareRealNetworks K.K.
    
    JapanRealNetworks Korea, Ltd.
    
    Republic of KoreaRealNetworks Ltd.
    
    United KingdomRealNetworks of Brazil LtdA
    
    BrazilRealNetworks of Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoRealNetworks Oy (formerly Exomi Oy)
    
    FinlandRealNetworks Singapore Pte. Limited
    
    SingaporeRealNetworks, SARL
    
    FranceRhapsody America LLC
    
    DelawareRhapsody International SARL
    
    LuxembourgRN Acquisition Corp.
    
    WashingtonRN Gemco, Inc.
    
    DelawareRN International Holdings B.V.
    
    The NetherlandsRN International Holdings C.V.
    
    The Netherlands




---



##### 



Name of Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationTM Acquisition LLC
    
    DelawareTrymedia Systems Sarl
    
    SwitzerlandTrymedia Systems Sociedad Limitada
    
    SpainWiderThan Americas, Inc.
    
    DelawareWiderThan UK Ltd.
    
    United KingdomXing Technology Corporation
    
    CaliforniaReal
Games Europe B.V. (formerly Zylom Media Group B.V.)
    
    The Netherlands
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-109 September 24, 2002

NRC GRANTS TVA LICENSE AMENDMENT TO PRODUCE TRITIUM AT WATTS BAR

NUCLEAR POWER PLANT FOR ENERGY DEPARTMENT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has granted the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) a

license amendment to produce tritium at its Watts Bar nuclear power plant for use by the Department of

Energy (DOE). 

The license amendment grants TVA permission to use tritium-producing burnable absorber rods

at the Watts Bar facility, located near Spring City, Tenn. DOE has developed technology to produce

tritium using lithium, rather than boron, in burnable absorber rods to be installed in the Watts Bar

reactor. The irradiated rods are to be removed from the power plant and shipped to the Savannah River

Site, near Aiken, S.C., where DOE plans to extract the tritium.

The NRC staff held public meetings on the issue in Rockville, Md., in February 1997, and in

Sweetwater, Tenn., in August 1997. The NRC staff determined in September 1997 that TVA could

place 32 of the burnable absorber rods in the Watts Bar reactor core to test the technology. TVA

irradiated the rods until the spring of 1999 and removed them from the reactor. DOE has examined the

rods and confirmed that the technology worked. 

A public meeting to discuss the tritium production and the NRC’s process for reviewing the

TVA license amendment request was held in Evensville, Tenn., last October. 

TVA’s license amendment permits it to install up to 2,304 of the rods into the Watts Bar reactor

and irradiate them for one fuel cycle, which lasts about 18 months. TVA will then remove the

irradiated rods for shipment to DOE’s tritium extraction facility at the Savannah River Site. DOE

subsequently plans to have TVA install new rods in the reactor to repeat the process for the life of the

plant. 

The TVA Watts Bar license amendment will be publicly accessible from the NRC’s

Agencywide Documents Access and Management Systems (ADAMS) Public Electronic Room

sometime in September. Help in using ADAMS is available from the NRC Public Document Room at

301-415-4737 or 800-397-4209.

###
EXHIBIT 23



LOGO



CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Board of
Directors

Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc.

Cheraw, South Carolina



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc. on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-79339 and 333-120048) of our report dated August 22, 2005 on the consolidated financial statements of Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary as of and for the years ended June 30, 2005 and 2004,
which appears in the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc.



LOGO

Charlotte, North Carolina

September 27, 2005
DECLARATION OF VICTORIA JACQMEIN 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1746, the undersigned states as follows: 

1. My name is Victoria Jacqmein. I am over twenty-one years of age and have 

personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein. 

2. I am a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the 

“Commission”). 

3. Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of a document that appears in the 

Commission records and that was produced to the Commission by A Better Financial Plan in 

response to a subpoena in the Commission matter In re A Better Financial Plan (NY-9593). 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true, correct, and made in good faith. 

 

Executed on this 22nd day of July 2020. 

_________________________ 

 VICTORIA JACQMEIN 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 27-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 27-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2020 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**pursuant to Section 302 of the**

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, David B. Kaysen, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Diametrics Medical, Inc.; 

 

2.    Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: 

 

(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 9, 2004
#### U. S. Food and Drug AdministrationCenter for Food Safety and Applied NutritionOffice of Plant and Dairy Foods and Beverages1994; Updated October, 1999

**Pesticide Analytical Manual (PAM)**

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for enforcing tolerancesestablished by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for amounts ofpesticide residues that may legally remain on food (including animal feed).In meeting this responsibility, FDA collects and analyzes food from commercial channels of trade for determining compliancewith EPA tolerances. Residue data gathered under this regulatory monitoring program are also used for evaluating the extent and significance of pesticide residues in the food supply.

The Pesticide Analytical Manual (PAM) is published by FDA as a repository of the analytical methods used in FDA laboratoriesto examine food for pesticide residues for regulatory purposes (40 CFR 180.101 (c)).The manual is organized according to the scope of the analytical methods:

#### Volume I

Contains multiresidue methods (MRMs) that are used by FDA on a routine basis, because of their efficiency andbroad applicability, especially for analyzing foods of unknown pesticide treatment history. Both the complete, current version ofPAM I (October, 1999) and therevisions and replacement tablesfor PAM I 3rd edition are available in Adobe Acrobat pdf format;viewing and/or printing these files requires the free Adobe Acrobat reader.Additional information is available about downloading and using Adobe Acrobat Reader.

#### Volume II

Contains methods designed for the analysis of commodities for residues of only a single compound(although some methods are capable of determining several related compounds). These methods are most often used when the likely residue is known and/or when the residue of interest cannot be determined by common MRMs.An  updated index to PAM II is now available.Pesticides, Metals, & Industrial Chemicals  |  Pesticide Analytical ManualFoods Home  |  FDA Home  |  Search/Subject Index  |  Disclaimers & Privacy Policy  |  Accessibility/HelpThis page last updated on 2002-JUN-20 by cmm/frf
114 STAT. 1292 PUBLIC LAW 106–325—OCT. 19, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3909:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

July 11, considered and passed House.

Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–325

106th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4601 South

Cottage Grove Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘Henry W. McGee Post Office

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

4601 South Cottage Grove Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, shall be

known and designated as the ‘‘Henry W. McGee Post Office

Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Henry

W. McGee Post Office Building’’.

Approved October 19, 2000.

Oct. 19, 2000

[H.R. 3909]
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23



                             Baird, Kurtz & Dobson
                            901 E. St. Louis Street
                           Suite 1000, P.O. Box 1190
                       Springfield, Missouri 65801-1190


                      Consent of Independent Accountants
                      ----------------------------------

Board of Directors
Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc.
Springfield, Missouri

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-
47241 and 333-31196 on Forms S-8 of GUARANTY FEDERAL BANCSHARES, INC. of our
report dated July 21, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
GUARANTY FEDERAL BANCSHARES, INC. as of June 30, 2000 and 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2000, which
report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of GUARANTY FEDERAL BANCSHARES,
INC. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000.

                                                       /s/ Baird, Kurtz & Dobson

September 25, 2000
Springfield, Missouri
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23848]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 4866]


Shipping Coordinating Committee; Notice of Meeting

    The Shipping Coordinating Committee (SHC) will conduct an open 
meeting at 9 a.m. on Wednesday, December 1, 2004, in Room 6103 of the 
United States Coast Guard Headquarters Building, 2100 2nd Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20593-0001. The primary purpose of the meeting is to 
begin preparations for the 48th Session of the International Maritime 
Organization (IMO) Sub-Committee on Stability and Load Lines and on 
Fishing Vessels Safety to be held at IMO Headquarters in London, 
England from September 12th to 16th.
    The primary matters to be considered include:

--Development of explanatory notes for harmonized SOLAS Chapter II-1;
--Large passenger ship safety;
--Review of the Intact Stability Code;
--Review of the Offshore Supply Vessel Guidelines;
--Harmonization of damage stability provisions in other IMO 
instruments;
--Review of the 2000 HSC Code and amendments to the DSC Code and the 
1994 HSC Code;
--Tonnage measurement of open-top containerships.

    Members of the public may attend this meeting up to the seating 
capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by 
writing to Mr. Paul Cojeen, Commandant (G-MSE), U.S. Coast Guard 
Headquarters, 2100 Second Street, SW., Room 1308, Washington, DC 20593-
0001 or by calling (202) 267-2988.

    Dated: October 19, 2004.
Clay L. Diamond,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 04-23848 Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-P
§ 190.35 Notice of intent to export or destroy; examination of merchandise. ( a ) *Notice.* A notice of intent to export or destroy merchandise which may be the subject of an unused merchandise drawback claim (19 U.S.C. 1313(j)) must be provided to CBP to give CBP the opportunity to examine the merchandise. The claimant or the exporter (for destruction under CBP supervision, see § 190.71) must file at the port of intended examination a Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy, or Return Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback on CBP Form 7553 at least 5 working days prior to the date of intended exportation unless CBP approves another filing period or the claimant has been granted a waiver of prior notice (*see* § 190.91).
( b ) *Required information.* The notice must certify that the merchandise has not been used in the United States before exportation or destruction. In addition, if applicable, the notice must provide the bill of lading number, if known, the name and telephone number, mailing address, and, if available, fax number and email address of a contact person, and the location of the merchandise.
( c ) *Decision to examine or to waive examination.* Within 2 working days after receipt of the Notice of Intent to Export, Destroy, or Return Merchandise for Purposes of Drawback (*see* paragraph (a) of this section), CBP will notify the party designated on the Notice in writing of CBP's decision to either examine the merchandise to be exported, or to waive examination. If CBP timely notifies the designated party, in writing, of its decision to examine the merchandise (*see* paragraph (d) of this section), but the merchandise is exported without having been presented to CBP for examination, any drawback claim, or part thereof, based on the Notice will be denied. If CBP notifies the designated party, in writing, of its decision to waive examination of the merchandise, or, if timely notification of a decision by CBP to examine or to waive examination has not been received, the merchandise may be exported without delay.
( d ) *Time and place of examination.* If CBP gives timely notice of its decision to examine the exported merchandise, the merchandise to be examined must be promptly presented to CBP. CBP must examine the merchandise within 5 working days after presentation of the merchandise. The merchandise may be exported without examination if CBP fails to timely examine the merchandise after presentation to CBP. If the examination is to be completed at a port other than the port of actual exportation or destruction, the merchandise must be transported in-bond to the port of exportation or destruction.
( e ) *Extent of examination.* The appropriate CBP office may permit release of merchandise without examination, or may examine, to the extent determined to be necessary, the items to be exported or destroyed.
Editorial Note on Part 159
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93023, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 159.62 Notice of distribution. ( a ) *Publication of notice.* At least 90 days before the end of a fiscal year, Customs will publish in the Federal Register a notice of intention to distribute assessed duties received as the continued dumping and subsidy offset for that fiscal year. The notice will include the list of domestic producers, based upon the list supplied by the USITC (see § 159.61(b)(1)), that would be potentially eligible to receive the distribution.
( b ) *Content of notice.* The notice of intention to distribute the offset will also contain the following: ( 1 ) The case name and number of the particular order or finding concerned, together with the dollar amount contained in the special account for that order or finding as of June 1 of the subject fiscal year (see § 159.64(a)(1)); and
( 2 ) The instructions for filing the certification under § 159.63 in order to claim a distribution.
#### Mary A. Agunzo, an Infant, by Michael Agunzo, Her Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. Surface Transportation Corporation of New York, Respondent.

No opinion. Present— Townley, Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
1



## UV analysis of

Sep tember 10, 2013

Methodology

Instrument: Thermo Evolution 300

Cell: Quartz 10 mm 3.0ml volume

Solvent : methanol
Wavelength: 2 00 nm

- 900 nm

Slit Width: 1 nm

F i gure 1. UV spectrum of (190

- 900nm)2

Figure 2. UV spectrum of (190

- 300nm)
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-079 May 9, 2000

NRC AMENDS REGULATIONS

FOR REACTOR SAFETY ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS

The Nuclear RegulatoryCommission is issuing a revised rule that could allow utilities to seek small

increases to the authorized power level for nuclear power plants -- usually on the order of one percent --

by more accurately accounting for uncertainties in power level measurement.

At present, NRC regulations require most licensees to analyze emergency core cooling system

capabilities assuming that the reactor was operating at 102 percent power if a loss-of-coolant accident

occurred. This requirement, applied since 1974, was intended to provide an additional safety margin to

assure adequate emergency cooling. It was necessary because of uncertainties in the accuracy of reactor

power measurement.

Recently, licensees have sought credit for improved instrumentation that is now available that can

measure reactor power levels more precisely, therefore eliminating the need for the two percent uncertainty

margin currently required. NRC has granted an exemption from the current requirement to one utility

using such updated technology. The rule change is needed to avert the need to process many similar

exemption requests.

The rule change offers licensees additional operating flexibility, including the opportunity to

increase licensed power in some cases. Licensees gaining NRC approval for small increases in licensed

power level on the basis of the amended rule could realize significant economic benefits.

The NRC believes that this move will help increase regulatory efficiency without compromising

safety at nuclear power plants. Safety is maintained because there is substantial safety margin in other

parts of the analyses of emergency core cooling system capabilities. Also, slight changes in the power level

assumed for analysis are expected to yield only small changes to the analysis results.

The proposed rule change was issued for public comment on October 1, 1999, and amends the

current requirement in Appendix K, Part 50, of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Other

provisions are described in a notice to be published in an upcoming edition of the Federal Register. The

revised rule becomes effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.

##