alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Kevin Leray Henderson, Appellant

No. 06

- 12

- 00132

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 115th District Court of Upshur County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 16

, 027 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appellant, Kevin Leray Henderson, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AP RIL 10, 2013 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
### §31a. Repealed. Mar. 2, 1955, ch. 9, §4(b), 69 Stat. 11, eff. Mar. 1, 1955

Section, acts Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title VI, §601(b), 60 Stat. 850; Oct. 20, 1951, ch. 521, title VI, §619(d), 65 Stat. 570, related to expense allowance for Senators, Representatives, Delegates, and Resident Commissioner.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. III-02-045 July 23, 2002

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC PROPOSES $3,000 FINE AGAINST NORTHERN ENGRAVING

FOR THE LOSS OF CONTROL OVER STATIC ELIMINATORS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $3,000 fine against Northern

Engraving Corporation, Sparta, Wisconsin, for the improper transfer of a static elimination device

containing a sealed radiation source. 

On January 17, the NRC asked Northern Engraving to provide information about any generally

licensed devices currently or formerly in its possession. In its March 13 response, Northern Engraving

erroneously reported that it did not possess any generally licensed devices.

However, on April 10, Northern Engraving transferred a static eliminator from its Sparta,

Wisconsin, facility, containing radioactive americium-241, to an aluminum scrap hauler. The device

was subsequently transferred to a scrap processor, where it set off radiation detectors. A survey of the

device for removable contamination indicated that a small amount of americium-241 was present but

presented no health hazard to the public. The hauler had slightly damaged the device’s radioactive

material surface when he removed a protective grid before transporting the static eliminator to the

scrap processor. 

After the device was returned to Northern Engraving, the company transferred it to the

manufacturer, as is provided for by federal regulation.

The NRC conducted inspections into the circumstances of the incident and held a predecisional

enforcement conference with Northern Engraving to discuss apparent violations of NRC requirements

and to prevent recurrence of the violations. 

The NRC staff identified two violations of federal regulations based on inspection findings and

information provided during the conference: (1) failure to transfer generally licensed devices only to

authorized recipients; and (2) failure to provide complete and accurate information to the NRC.

The company has until August 21 to either pay the fine or to protest it. If the fine is protested

and subsequently imposed by the NRC staff, the company may request a hearing. 

# # #
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 9:20-cv-81367-WPD

HOWARD COHAN,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

TIN ROOF DELRAY BEACH, LLC.,

 Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING CONSENT DECREE 

THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Parties’ Renewed Joint Motion for Approval 

and Entry of Consent Decree [DE 18] (“Motion”). The Court has carefully considered the Motion 

is otherwise fully advised in the premises. 

Accordingly, it is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Motion [DE 18] is hereby GRANTED.

2. The Court hereby ADOPTS AND APPROVES the Consent Decree [DE 18-1].

3. This case is DISMISSED. 

4. This Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Consent Decree.

5. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case and DENY any pending motions as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Ft. Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida this 

28th day of December, 2020.

Case 9:20-cv-81367-WPD Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/28/2020 Page 1 of 2
Copies furnished to:

All counsel of record

Case 9:20-cv-81367-WPD Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/28/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### Max Weinstein, Respondent, v. Louis Berry, Appellant.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### Lena Parsons, Appellant, v. Village of Dannemora, Respondent. Washburn Parsons, Appellant, v. Village of Dannemora, Respondent.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffeman, Deyo, Santry and Bergan, JJ.
#### § 158.4 Liability of carrier for lost or missing packages.

Upon a joint determination or independent determination of quantity as set forth in § 158.1 (a) or (b) resulting in the merchandise being “permitted,” the carrier shall be responsible only for any discrepancy between the manifested quantity and the “permitted” quantity. In the case of an importing carrier, when there is a difference between the quantity shown on the inward foreign manifest and the quantity “permitted,” liquidated damages or duties shall be assessed under the provisions of the carrier's bond or under the provisions of section 448, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1448), unless the carrier corrects his manifest (see § 4.12 of this chapter). In the case of a bonded carrier, liquidated damages for lost or missing merchandise shall be assessed in accordance with § 18.8 of this chapter.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 63173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23594]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-060-1320-EL; WYW151643]


Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision for the South 
Powder River Basin Coal Final Environmental Impact Statement, West 
Antelope Lease by Application Tract, Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 
1969, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announces the availability of 
the Record of Decision (ROD) for the South Powder River Basin Coal 
Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS); West Antelope Lease by 
Application Tract.

ADDRESSES: The document will be available electronically on the 
following Web site: http://www.wy.blm.gov/. Copies of the ROD are 
available for public inspection at the following BLM office locations:
    <bullet> Bureau of Land Management, Wyoming State Office, 5353 
Yellowstone Road, Cheyenne, Wyoming.
    <bullet> Bureau of Land Management, Casper Field Office, 2987 
Prospector Drive, Casper, Wyoming.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Bob Janssen, Wyoming Coal 
Coordinator, (307) 775-6206 or Ms. Mavis Love, Land Law Examiner (307) 
775-6258. Both Mr. Janssen's and Ms. Love's offices are located at the 
BLM Wyoming State Office, 5353 Yellowstone Road, Cheyenne, Wyoming 
82009.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As stated in the FEIS, a ROD will be issued 
for each of the five Federal coal tracts considered for leasing in the 
South Powder River Coal FEIS. The ROD covered by this Notice of 
Availability is for the West Antelope coal tract (WYW151643) and 
addresses leasing an estimated 202.3 million tons of in-place Federal 
coal administered by the BLM Casper Field Office underlying 
approximately 2,809.13 acres of private surface land in Converse 
County, Wyoming. The ROD approves Alternative 3 as the selected 
alternative. A competitive lease sale will be announced in the Federal 
Register at a later date.
    Because the Assistant Secretary of the Interior, Land and Minerals 
Management, has concurred in this decision, it is not subject to appeal 
to the Interior Board of Land Appeals as provided in 43 CFR part 4. 
This decision is the final action of the Department of the Interior.

Alan L. Kesterke,
Associate State Director.
[FR Doc. 04-23594 Filed 10-28-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
HomeAbout NRCRadiation ProtectionHow the NRC Protects YouHealth Physics Positions Based on 10 CFR Part 20

# Alternative Criteria Proposed by  NUMARC for Two Regulatory Positions in Regulatory Guide 8.14

## HPPOS-329

See the memorandum with enclosure from L.J. Cunningham to F.C. Combs (and others) dated December 2nd, 1993. 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Tuesday, October 31, 2017
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 779 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 779

To provide that certain rules and guidance related to waivers for State 
 innovation under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act shall 
                        have no force or effect.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 16, 2021

  Mr. Warner (for himself, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Cardin, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. 
Carper, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Peters, Mr. Reed, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Kaine, Mr. 
Blumenthal, Mr. Menendez, Ms. Smith, Mr. Merkley, Ms. Cortez Masto, Mr. 
  Van Hollen, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Booker, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Lujan, Mr. 
Markey, Ms. Warren, Ms. Rosen, Ms. Klobuchar, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Casey, 
  Mrs. Murray, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Tester, and Mr. Padilla) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that certain rules and guidance related to waivers for State 
 innovation under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act shall 
                        have no force or effect.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Americans with Pre-
Existing Conditions Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. PROVIDING THAT CERTAIN RULES AND GUIDANCE RELATED TO WAIVERS 
              FOR STATE INNOVATION UNDER THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND 
              AFFORDABLE CARE ACT SHALL HAVE NO FORCE OR EFFECT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services and the 
Secretary of the Treasury may not take any action to implement, 
enforce, or otherwise give effect to the rules and guidance described 
in subsection (b), and no such rules and guidance shall have any force 
or effect.
    (b) Rules and Guidance.--The rules and guidance described in this 
subsection are the following:
            (1) The provisions in the final rule issued by the 
        Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary of the 
        Treasury on January 19, 2021, relating to ``Updates to State 
        Innovation Waiver (Section 1332 Waiver) Implementing 
        Regulations'' (86 Fed. Reg. 6138).
            (2) The guidance issued by such Secretaries entitled 
        ``State Relief and Empowerment Waivers'' (83 Fed. Reg. 53575 
        (October 24, 2018)), or any other rule promulgated to give 
        effect to such guidance.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis Panel; R03 Review.                    

*Date:*                         March 3, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Library of Medicine, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Hua-Chuan Sim, MD, Health Science Administrator, National Library of Medicine, Extramural Programs, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

Dated: January 28, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-2381  Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-034 March 26, 2001

NRC TO HOLD WORKSHOP APRIL 4 ON PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ISSUES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a workshop April 4 in Rockville, Maryland, to

identify areas of potential improvement in the agency’s public participation policies and practices.

The workshop will be held in the auditorium of the agency's Two White Flint North building,

11545 Rockville Pike, beginning at 8:30 a.m. The complete agenda is attached.

The format of the meeting will be a facilitated roundtable discussion to encourage a frank

exchange among stakeholders and NRC staff for potential improvements in how the public can

effectively participate in NRC activities in a meaningful way.

Further information about the workshop and participation via telephone can be obtained from

the facilitator, Francis X. ("Chip") Cameron at 301-415-1642 or by email at fxc@nrc.gov

###
AGENDA FOR NRC PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ISSUES

8:30 a.m. -- Welcome, objectives, format and ground rules, agenda overview,

participant introductions, F.X. "Chip" Cameron, Facilitator

8:45 a.m. -- Context: The current NRC framework for public participation, Patricia G.

Norry, NRC Deputy Executive Director for Management Services

9:00 a.m. -- Questions and answers on the NRC framework

9:30 a.m. -- Participant discussion: Opportunities for improvement in NRC public participation

activities: identification of issues and supporting data:

Selected issues:

ˇ The need for different policies for different types of meetings, i.e., business

meetings with individual licensees, enforcement conferences, meetings

specifically designed to solicit public comment;

ˇ Timely and clear notice of meetings;

ˇ Provision of phone access to various types of meetings;

ˇ Provision of relevant background documents;

ˇ Access to NRC information generally;

ˇ Documentation of public comments, response to questions and answers;

ˇ Ensuring fairness and consistency;

ˇ How effectively does the NRC communicate information on risk?

ˇ Other issues?

10:15 a.m. -- Break

10:45 a.m. -- Identification of issues--continued

12:00 -- Lunch

1:00 p.m. -- Participant discussion: Potential solutions to issues and discussion of costs and

benefits of potential solutions

3:00 p.m. -- Break

3:15 p.m. -- Ongoing Process Solutions;

Staff contact for public participation issues;

Periodic meetings; Public advocate; Feedback forms; Other issues.

4:40 p.m. -- Next steps/need for additional meetings
5:00 p.m. -- Adjourn

###
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FORM 10-K405 FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,095
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  130,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                       586
<INVENTORY>                                      6,020
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,878
<PP&E>                                          17,781
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,710
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 226,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,358
<BONDS>                                        133,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,281)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   226,164
<SALES>                                        582,661
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               583,824
<CGS>                                          508,965
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  587,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   242
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,721
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,257)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       984
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,241)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,241)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0 <F1>

<FN>

<F1> NOT REQUIRED TO PRESENT EPS AS LONG AS THE COMPANY IS NOT PUBLICLY HELD.

</FN>


</TABLE>
### §61c–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 61c–1 was editorially reclassified as section 6540 of this title.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or vld@nrc.gov

I-96-25

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Victor Dricks April 2, 1996

LICENSING BOARD APPROVES SETTLEMENT BETWEEN NRC STAFF AND

ONCOLOGY SERVICES CORPORATION OF HARRISBURG AND RADIATION

ONCOLOGY CENTER AT MARLTON, NJ

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety & Licensing

Board has approved a settlement requested by the NRC with

Oncology Services Corporation and Radiation Oncology Center at

Marlton, New Jersey. The NRC staff has agreed to reduce separate

civil penalties previously issued to the two facilities to one

fine of $140,000.

The fine against Oncology Services Corporation (OSC) stemmed

from a November 1992 misadministration at OSC's Indiana

(Pennsylvania) Regional Cancer Center and inspections at two of

its facilities. A strong radiation source was left in the body

of a woman undergoing cancer treatment at the cancer center. The

source went undetected and the patient died five days later. The

official autopsy report listed the cause of death as acute

radiation exposure and its consequences. A $280,000 fine was

proposed last April 25.

The NRC staff also proposed an $80,000 fine against

Radiation Oncology Center at Marlton (ROCM) last April 24.

ROCM and OSC share common ownership. ROCM was cited for a number

of violations found during an NRC inspection of ROCM's New Jersey

facility.

Oncology Services and ROCM appealed their fines and

requested hearings.

Under the approved settlement, OSC and ROCM have agreed to

pay a single $140,000 civil penalty in 12 equal monthly

installments. They also have agreed to withdraw their respective

requests for hearings.

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey

were notified of this settlement agreement.

#
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-31 March 18, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC STAFF TO REVIEW APPARENT VIOLATION AT SEABROOK NUCLEAR PLANT

An apparent violation of Nuclear Regulatory Commission

requirements at the Seabrook nuclear power plant in Seabrook,

N.H., will be discussed by agency staff and plant managers on

Tuesday, March 24. At issue is a failure to promptly and

effectively address degraded equipment conditions at the

facility, which is operated by the North Atlantic Energy Service

Corporation.

The predecisional enforcement conference will begin at 10

a.m. in the Public Meeting Room at the NRC Region 1 Office in

King of Prussia, Pa. It will be open to the public for

observation.

During an inspection conducted from December 7 through

January 31 at the plant, NRC inspectors identified four examples

of a lack of prompt and effective repairs to equipment.

In two of the examples, there was a failure to maintain

minimum operability requirements for the safety injection system

and control room building air-conditioning system. The safety

injection system, one of the plant’s emergency core cooling

systems, would be used to help keep the reactor core cooled and

covered after a loss-of-coolant accident. The control room

building air-conditioning system would be needed to keep the

building habitable following an accident.

Another example involved the operation of the plant for

more than a year with leakage from a portion of the residual heat

removal system, another emergency core cooling system. The final

example had to do with a degraded charging pump. The pump is

used to help maintain the proper chemistry and reactivity in the

reactor.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement

conference does not mean that the NRC has determined a violation

has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather,
the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and

safety significance; to provide the licensee with an opportunity

to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC

inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline its

proposed corrective action.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at

this conference. That decision will be made by NRC officials at

a later time.

#