alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00295

- CR

B YRON J ACK R ICKARD

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 30th District Court

of Wichita County ( 61,604

- A )

November 30, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial co urt’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Mike Wallach

___________________ Justice Mike Wallach
Editorial Note on Part 159
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93023, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 159.7 Rewarehouse entries. The liquidation of the original warehouse entry shall be followed in determining the liability for duties on a rewarehouse entry, except in the following cases: ( a ) *Merchandise excluded from liquidation of original warehouse entry.* When any of the following types of merchandise are withdrawn from warehouse for transportation to another port, they will be excluded from the liquidation of the original warehouse entry, and the liability for duties will be determined by a liquidation of the rewarehouse entry made at the port where the merchandise is withdrawn for consumption or for exportation: ( 1 ) Alcoholic beverages provided for in headings 2203 through 2208, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) (19 U.S.C. 1202), and subject to internal revenue taxes;
( 2 ) Cigars, cigarettes, and cigarette papers and tubes subject to internal revenue taxes;
( 3 ) Tariff-rate quota merchandise; and
( 4 ) Wool or hair subject to duty at a rate per clean kilogram under Chapter 51, HTSUS.
( b ) *Reliquidation required by change in rate.* When a rate of customs duty or tax is changed by an act of Congress or a proclamation of the President, any necessary reliquidation of customs duty or tax on merchandise covered by a rewarehouse entry which may be required by reason of the change in rate will be made by the Center director on the effective date of the change.
( c ) *Shortage, irregular delivery, nondelivery, and other cases.* In cases involving shortage, irregular delivery, or nondelivery under the original warehouse withdrawal for transportation, or in other cases when the Center director is of the opinion that circumstances make it inadvisable to follow the liquidation of the original warehouse entry, he will make an appropriate adjustment in the amount of duties to be assessed under the rewarehouse entry.
[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17482, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51270, Dec. 21, 1988; T.D. 90-78, 55 FR 40168, Oct. 2, 1990; CBP Dec. 11-02, 76 FR 2576, Jan. 14, 2011]
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Carlos Robanne Lo, on behalf of himself 

and all others similarly situated, 

 Case No.: 0:20-cv-61319-RKA 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

 

Management Health Systems, LLC d/b/a 

MedPro Staffing, 

 Defendant. 

_________________________________________

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

Plaintiff Carlos Robanne Lo (“Plaintiff”), through counsel, hereby gives notice pursuant to 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of his voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice. 

Dated: August 7, 2020 VARNELL & WARWICK, P.A. 

By:_/s/ Janet R. Varnell 

Janet R. Varnell, FBN: 0071072 

Brian W. Warwick: FBN: 0605573 

Matthew T. Peterson, FBN: 1020720 

Erika Willis, FBN: 10021 

1101 E. Cumberland Ave., Suite 201H, #105 

Tampa, Florida 33602 

Telephone: (352) 753-8600 

Facsimile: (352) 504-3301 

jvarnell@varnellandwarwick.com 

bwarwick@varnellandwarwick.com 

mpeterson@varnellandwarwick.com 

ewillis@varnellandwarwick.com 

kstroly@varnellandwarwick.com 

1101 E. Cumberland Ave., Suite 201H, #105 

Tampa, Florida 33602 

Tel: 352-753-8600 

jvarnell@varnellandwarwick.com 

bwarwick@varnessandwarwick.com 

kstroly@varnellandwarwick.com 

Case 0:20-cv-61319-RKA Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2020 Page 1 of 3
2 

NICHOLS KASTER, PLLP 

Anna P. Prakash (MN Bar No.0351362)* 

Charles A. Delbridge (MN Bar No. 0386639)* 

4600 IDS Center 

80 South Eighth Street 

Minneapolis, MN 55402 

Tel: (612) 256-3200 

Fax: (612) 338-4878 

aprakash@nka.com 

cdelbridge@nka.com 

*Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

 

Case 0:20-cv-61319-RKA Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2020 Page 2 of 3
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on all counsel of 

record via the CM/ECF system on this 7th day of August, 2020. 

s/ Janet R. Varnell 

 Janet R. Varnell 

Case 0:20-cv-61319-RKA Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2020 Page 3 of 3
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-152 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

(Thursday, October 9,

1997)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a

meeting November 4 and 5 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will

begin at 8:30 a.m. each day in Room T-2B3, of the NRC's Two White

Flint North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike. The Subcommittee

on Safety Research Program will discuss industry research

activities, NRC Safety Sesearch Program, and related matters, and

gather information for preparing a draft annual report to

Congress.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for

public comment, will be described in a Notice of Meeting

published in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

#
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 723 

To amend the Small Business Act and the CARES Act to extend the covered 

period for the paycheck protection program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 11, 2021 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. CARDIN, and Mrs. SHAHEEN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act and the CARES Act 

to extend the covered period for the paycheck protection 

program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘PPP Extension Act 

5 of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF COVERED PERIOD FOR PAYCHECK 

7 PROTECTION PROGRAM. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7(a)(36)(A)(iii) of the 

9 Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)(36)(A)(iii)) is 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 723 IS

1 amended by striking ‘‘March 31, 2021’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘June 30, 2021’’. 

3 (b) FUNDING.—Section 1102(b)(1) of the CARES 

4 Act (Public Law 116–136), as amended by section 323 

5 of the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Non6 profits, and Venues Act (title III of division N of Public 

7 Law 116–260), is amended by striking ‘‘March 31, 2021’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘June 30, 2021’’. 

9 (c) RESTRICTION.—From June 1, 2021, through 

10 June 30, 2021, the Administrator of the Small Business 

11 Administration shall not accept new lender applications 

12 for loans under paragraph (36) or (37) of section 7(a) 

13 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)) and shall 

14 only process such lender applications that have been sub15 mitted to the Administrator before June 1, 2021. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-151 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

(Thursday, October 9,

1997)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled a

meeting on November 5 in Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will

begin at noon in Room T-2B1, of the NRC's Two White Flint North

Building at 11545 Rockville Pike. The Subcommittee on Planning

and Procedures will discuss proposed ACRS activities and the

qualifications of candidates for appointment to ACRS. Some

portions of the meeting dealing with internal personnel rules and

practices of ACRS, may be closed.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for

public comment, will be described in a Notice of Meeting

published in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

#
#### § 172.0 Scope.

This part contains provisions relating to petitions for relief from claims for liquidated damages arising under any Customs bond and penalties incurred which are secured by the conditions of the International Carrier Bond (see § 113.64 of this Chapter). This part does not relate to petitions on unsecured fines or penalties or seizures and forfeitures, nor does it relate to petitions for the restoration of proceeds of sale pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1613.
---

---

# Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Guy Bernstein,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|(1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
          applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  April 27, 2009 |  | /s/ Guy Bernstein
Guy Bernstein
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-23275-CIV-UNGARO/O'SULLIVAN

WILLIAM B. NUNEZ,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

 /

SCHEDULING ORDER

THIS CASE is before the Court sua sponte. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

(1) Plaintiff shall file a motion for summary judgment, setting forth the reasons for

relief and including citations to the administrative record and relevant legal authorities on or

before sixty (60) days from the date of this Order. 

(2) Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment within thirty (30) days after Plaintiff files his motion

for summary judgment.

(3) Plaintiff may respond to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and reply to

Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment within thirty (30) days after

Defendant files a response and motion as set forth in Paragraph 2 above.

(4) The requirements of Local Rule 56.1 shall not apply to this matter. The parties

should not file a separate statement of facts and the statement of facts need not be in separately

numbered paragraphs. The facts shall be supported by specific references to the administrative record.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 18th day of February, 2021.

 

JOHN J. O’SULLIVAN

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-23275-UU Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/18/2021 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.74 Animals straying across boundary for pasturage; offspring.

When domestic animals for which free entry is to be claimed under subheading 9801.00.90, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, have strayed across the boundary line, they may be returned, together with their offspring, without entry if brought back within 30 days; otherwise entry shall be required. The owner of any such animal shall report its return to the nearest Customs office and hold it for such inspection and treatment as may be deemed necessary by a representative of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of the Department of Agriculture. Any such arrival found not to have been so reported or held shall be subject to seizure and forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 545.

[T.D. 87-75, 52 FR 20067, May 29, 1987, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51250, Dec. 21, 1988]
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 805 

To repeal the wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17 (legislative day, MARCH 16), 2021 

Mr. LEE (for himself, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. CORNYN, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. INHOFE, and Mr. CRUZ) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To repeal the wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Davis-Bacon Repeal 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DAVIS-BACON WAGE REQUIREMENTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter IV of chapter 31 of 

8 title 40, United States Code, is repealed. 

9 (b) REFERENCE.—Any reference in any law to a re10 quirement under subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, 

11 United States Code, shall be null and void. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 805 IS

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE AND LIMITATION. 

2 Section 2, and the amendment made by such section, 

3 shall take effect 30 days after the date of enactment of 

4 this Act but shall not affect any contract that is— 

5 (1) in existence on the date that is 30 days 

6 after such date of enactment; or 

7 (2) made pursuant to an invitation for bids out8 standing on the date that is 30 days after such date 

9 of enactment. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.610 Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment of non-originating cotton or man-made fiber apparel goods. ( a ) *Effect of noncompliance.* If an importer of a good for which a TPL claim is made fails to comply with any applicable requirement under this subpart, the Center director may deny preferential tariff treatment to the imported good.
( b ) *Failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment.* Where the requirements for preferential tariff treatment set forth elsewhere in this subpart are met, the Center director nevertheless may deny preferential tariff treatment to a good for which a TPL claim is made if the good is shipped through or transshipped in a country other than a Party, and the importer of the good does not provide, at the request of the Center director, evidence demonstrating to the satisfaction of the Center director that the requirements set forth in § 10.609(a) of this subpart were met.
### §31b–6. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–151, title I, §102(b), Nov. 13, 1985, 99 Stat. 797

Section, based on H. Res. No. 1238, §6, Dec. 23, 1970, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 91–665, ch. VIII, Jan. 8, 1971, 84 Stat. 1989; Pub. L. 93–532, §1(a), Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1723, provided for an allowance to the former Speaker of the House for stationery and other office supplies.
###### Editorial Note on Part 159

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93023, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 159.33 Proclaimed rate.

If a rate of exchange has been proclaimed by the Secretary of the Treasury in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 5151(b) for the currency involved, such proclaimed rate shall be used unless it varies by 5 percent or more from the certified daily rate for the date of exportation as set forth in § 159.35. In determining the percentage of variation between the proclaimed rate and the certified rate, the difference between the two rates shall be divided by the certified rate.

[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17482, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 97-82, 62 FR 51771, Oct. 3, 1997]
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

No. III-00-39 July 10, 2000

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING JULY 14 IN CORDOVA, ILLINOIS

TO DESCRIBE LATEST ASSESSMENT OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting July 14 in Cordova,

Illinois, to discuss the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Plant’s latest performance review results. The plant

is operated by Commonwealth Edison Co.

The meeting will be held at 10 a.m. CDT, at the plant’s Training Center at 22710 - 206th

Avenue N.

The Plant Performance Reviews (PPRs) are an interim measure the NRC has used to assess

nuclear power plant safety while a revised reactor oversight process was being developed. The primary

purpose of the PPRs is to evaluate safety performance information and identify any changes in plant

performance so the NRC can allocate inspection resources appropriately. The text of each PPR letter,

including the one on Quad Cities, is available from the NRC Office of Public Affairs and has been

posted at: <http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr> on the NRC web site.

The NRC staff will also discuss a change in one of the performance indicators which

supplement NRC inspections in assessing the plant’s performance.

The utility found, during a routine test in March, that a oil pump associated with the high

pressure emergency cooling water system would not function automatically and therefore the

emergency system was considered inoperable. The oil pump, however, could have been controlled

manually, and the emergency system would then have been operational. The pump problem was

subsequently repaired, and the cooling system is now fully operable.

The NRC reactor oversight process characterizes the safety significance of each performance

indicator by a color -- green, white, yellow, or red. A green performance indicator receives normal

NRC oversight, while white, yellow, or red assessments receive increasing NRC involvement. The

equipment problem with the high pressure emergency cooling system resulted in a “yellow”

performance indicator.

When a “yellow” performance indicator or inspection finding occurs, the oversight process

calls for the NRC to hold a public meeting with plant management, conduct additional inspections

focused on the cause of the degraded performance, and oversee the plant staff's self-assessment and

correction of the issues.
Current performance information for the plants is available on the NRC web site at:

<http://www.nrc.gov/ras>.

A plain language summary of the new reactor oversight process is available from the NRC

Office of Public Affairs or on the web site at: <http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm>.

#####
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-144 November 6, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610) 337-5331

NRC STAFF PROPOSES TO FINE NIAGARA MOHAWK $50,000

FOR MAINTENANCE RULE VIOLATIONS AT NINE MILE POINT UNIT 1

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a

$50,000 civil penalty against Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

for two violations of NRC requirements at the Nine Mile Point

Nuclear Station, Unit 1, in Scriba, N.Y.

An inspection of Niagara Mohawk’s maintenance rule

implementation program was conducted by the NRC staff between

October 7 and October 11, 1996. Based on the information

developed during the inspection and after the evaluation of the

information Niagara Mohawk provided during a February

predecisional enforcement conference, the NRC has determined that

two violations of NRC requirements occurred.

The NRC maintenance rule requires nuclear plant licensees to

monitor the effectiveness of maintenance activities for safetysignificant plant equipment in order to minimize the likelihood

of failure and of events caused by the lack of effective

maintenance. The NRC staff began performing baseline inspections

of each licensee’s implementation of the maintenance rule after

it went into effect in July of last year.

The first violation at Nine Mile Point cited involved seven

examples of the failure to include some equipment in a program to

monitor performance against established goals as required by the

maintenance rule. The second violation included nine examples of

failure to demonstrate that structures, systems or components

within the scope of the rule had appropriate preventive

maintenance to remain capable of performing their intended

function.

In a letter to Niagara Mohawk, NRC Region I Administrator

Hubert J. Miller said, the violations represent “a significant

failure to implement key aspects of the maintenance rule.” He

said enforcement is warranted because of the “significant

regulatory concern” with the common underlying root causes of the

violations, which include lack of individual accountability,

inadequate management oversight and insufficient self-assessment.
2

The NRC staff recognized that, once the NRC team found the

violations, Niagara Mohaawk took some prompt and comprehensive

corrective measures. These included improvement of senior

management oversight of the maintenance rule program, enhancement

of administrative control procedures, and plans for periodic

assessments of the program.

The company has 30 days either to pay the proposed fine or

to request that all or part of the penalty be withdrawn.

#
#### § 111.33 Government records.

A broker must not procure or attempt to procure, directly or indirectly, information from Government records or other Government sources of any kind to which access is not granted by proper authority.
steam_record - Re: FW: Steam Electric Power Information Request - Extension Request 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire for JT Deely (Plant ID:04017) and OW Sommers (Plant ID:03141) was 

received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that 

submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date of your questionnaire 

unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Verification of delivery status of questionnaire package for JK Pruce was forwarded to the 

steam electric helpline. You should hear back from them soon with tracking information.

Sincerely, 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Tieken, Gregg R." <GRTieken@CPSEnergy.com>

Date: 7/15/2010 7:08 AM

Subject: Re: FW: Steam Electric Power Information Request - Extension Request

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C3EB403D... 8/17/2011