alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
April 30, 2015

EPA/FMC Meeting on Sulfentrazone Registration Review

Potomac Yards South Room S-9100

10:00 to 11:00 am

Call in number is (866)299-3188, conference code (703)308-0128#

Meeting Agenda:

I. Introductions & Meeting Objective – 5 min 

II. Registration Review Updates & Schedule – 10 min

III. Risk Mitigation Discussion – 35 min

IV. Summary and Next Steps – 10 min

Meeting Summary:

• The OPP registration review team for sulfentrazone met with FMC, the technical registrant 

for this pre-emergent broadleaf herbicide, to discuss mitigation measures. 

• The primary risk concern for sulfentrazone is drift to non-target plants and discussion 

centered on mitigation to minimize drift, especially from aerial application. 

• Discussion focused on the importance of tightening up spray drift and herbicide resistance 

language and making it consistent across product labels, as appropriate. 

• The EPA team shared documents with FMC on best management practices (BMPs) for 

boom spraying (by the American Society of Agricultural Engineers) and herbicide resistance 

(by the Weed Science Society of America) with FMC. 

• The Proposed Interim Decision (PID) for sulfentrazone is scheduled to be released for 

comment in June 2015; the Final Interim Decision is scheduled for late 2015.

Meeting Participants: 

• See attached sign in sheet.
###### Editorial Note on Part 181

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 181 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93026, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 181.0 Scope.

This part implements the duty preference and related Customs provisions applicable to imported goods under the North American Free Trade Agreement (the NAFTA) entered into on December 17, 1992, and under the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (107 Stat. 2057) (the Act). This part is not applicable to goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after July 1, 2020. Except as otherwise specified in this part, the procedures and other requirements set forth in this part are in addition to the Customs procedures and requirements of general application contained elsewhere in this chapter. Additional provisions implementing certain aspects of the NAFTA and the Act are contained in parts 10, 12, 24, 134 and 174 of this chapter.

[T.D. 95-68, 60 FR 46364, Sept. 6, 1995, as amended at 85 FR 39693, July 1, 2020]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-218 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, December 8, 1998)

COMMISSION TERMINATES PROCEEDINGS

IN SEABROOK LICENSE AMENDMENT CASE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, acting on a motion filed

by North Atlantic Energy Services Corporation (NAESCO), has

terminated proceedings involving a proposed license amendment for

the Seabrook nuclear power plant in New Hampshire.

NAESCO was seeking to revise the Seabrook license to permit

inspection of the plant steam generator tubes at 24-month, rather

than 18-month, intervals. Both the Seacoast Anti-Pollution

League (SAPL) and New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution

(NECNP)sought a hearing on the request before an NRC Licensing

Board.

The Commission took jurisdiction in the case in September

to provide early review of a novel issue that could have broad

implications for other proceedings. That question was whether

the utility could bring about a major operational change, such as

a lengthened fuel cycle, through several incremental license

amendments, rather than a single licensing action.

Shortly thereafter, at all the parties’ request, the

Commission held its proceedings in abeyance to permit settlement

negotiations to go forward. After no settlement was reached,

NAESCO withdrew its license amendment requests and moved that the

proceeding be terminated as moot.

In granting the utility’s motion, the Commission denied

motions by SAPL and NECNP that a separate proceeding be held on

the incremental license change issue outside the context of the

Seabrook proposal.

###
#### § 191.15 Recordkeeping.

Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1508(c)(3), all records which pertain to the filing of a drawback claim or to the information contained in the records required by 19 U.S.C. 1313 in connection with the filing of a drawback claim shall be retained for 3 years after payment of such claims or longer period if required by law (under 19 U.S.C. 1508, the same records may be subject to a different period for different purposes).
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn optimization-based integrated controls-structures design methodology for flexible space structuresAn approach for an optimization-based integrated controls-structures design is presented for a class of flexible spacecraft that require fine attitude pointing and vibration suppression. The integrated design problem is posed in the form of simultaneous optimization of both structural and control design variables. The approach is demonstrated by application to the integrated design of a generic space platform and to a model of a ground-based flexible structure. The numerical results obtained indicate that the integrated design approach can yield spacecraft designs that have substantially superior performance over a conventional design wherein the structural and control designs are performed sequentially. For example, a 40-percent reduction in the pointing error is observed along with a slight reduction in mass, or an almost twofold increase in the controlled performance is indicated with more than a 5-percent reduction in the overall mass of the spacecraft (a reduction of hundreds of kilograms).Document ID19930007426Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsMaghami, Peiman G.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Joshi, Suresh M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Armstrong, Ernest S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1993Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-3283NAS 1.60:3283L-17080Accession Number93N16615Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 590-14-51-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930007426.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Date: TYIQOj, Sept-crttbou II, ..lJJl) a__t 10 3u/hV) 

M eeting: /-{ e (./; w tl11__, 3 CN-M t'R- f3.u-l! VJ.el.d j 6uy f1 ~ •'r<f"'<-o)u_;Vl 

Rule(s) Discussed: R.£~ 

Written Materials? Y ~ 

Name Organization Phone N umber 

73Yt1 We4v ~511_0 Crf11P . 6t1 " 3 tf? ~ q'-( I Z-

() , 

I 

I
#### Jane Jones, Respondent, v. Kingsley Jones, Appellant.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-52478 and 33-80952), Form S-8-A (Nos. 33-52478
and 33-80952) and on Form S-4 (Nos. 333-36387 and 333-61221) of Building
Materials Holding Corporation of our report dated February 17, 2000 relating to
the financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders,
which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated February 17, 2000 relating to the
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/  PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
-------------------------------
     PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Francisco, California
March 27, 2000
----

----

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 11, 2010 |                          |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                    |                          |   |
|                    | /s/ Nir Feller           |   |
|                    | Nir Feller                    |   |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer       |   |
|                    | (Principal Financial Officer) |   |

----

----
#### § 172.41 Time and place of filing.

If the petitioner is not satisfied with a decision of the deciding official on an original petition for relief, a supplemental petition may be filed with the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer having jurisdiction in the port where the violation occurred. The petitioner must file such a supplemental petition within 60 days from the date of notice to the petitioner of the decision from which further relief is requested or within 60 days following an administrative or judicial decision with respect to issues serving as the basis for the claim for liquidated damages (whichever is later) unless another time to file such a supplemental petition is prescribed in the decision. A supplemental petition may be filed whether or not the mitigated amount designated in the decision on the original petition is paid.
|  |
|--|

|  |  |
|--|--|

| ** ** |
|------------|

|   | ****Arthur Rudolph**** 
107 pages

The FBI investigated this German rocket scientist who immigrated to the United States following World War II. He was employed at various U.S. government agencies, including NASA.

**Part 01**

Introduction
Reading Room Index - A   B   C   D   E    F   G- H   I    J    K   L   M   N   -O   P   Q   R   S   T   U-V   W   X   Y   Z   
Electronic Reading Room
- Alphabetical Listing- Espionage-Famous Persons-Gangster Era- Historical Interest- Unusual Phenomena-Violent CrimeFBI              File Fact Sheet FOIA Request Instructions- FOIA Request Form - Privacy Waiver and Certificate of Identity Form Privacy Act Instructions- Privacy Act Request FormDOJ              Reference GuideU.S.              DOJ FOIASearch
All of these publications are in PDF (Portable Document Format). To view them you will need to have the Adobe Acrobat Reader plug-in installed on your computer. The Reader can be downloaded at no cost from Adobe's site on the World Wide Web.   If you have difficulty accessing any material on this site because of a disability, please contact us in writing or via telephone and we will work with you to make the information available.

Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Section    202-324-5520 |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP REGARDING FEG, INC.



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 
  
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8 Nos. 33-43799, 33-71446, 33-86358, 33-89584, 333-04962, 333-06324, 333-07466, 333-10338, 333-10624, 333-12878 and 333-51434-1 and Form F-3 Nos. 333-06896, 333-08246 and 333-13556) of The News Corporation Limited and subsidiaries of our report
dated August 14, 2002, except for Note 20, as to which the date is August 21, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Fox Entertainment Group, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended June 30, 2002.

  
 /s/    Ernst & Young LLP 
                                      
                                        
          
 Ernst & Young LLP 
  

Los Angeles, California 
 December 27, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1404 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1404

 To direct the Secretary of Defense to present a ribbon of appropriate 
 design to all persons who, while a member of the Armed Forces serving 
   on active duty, were exposed to ionizing radiation as a result of 
               participation in a test of atomic weapons.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 20, 2003

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Defense to present a ribbon of appropriate 
 design to all persons who, while a member of the Armed Forces serving 
   on active duty, were exposed to ionizing radiation as a result of 
               participation in a test of atomic weapons.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Atomic Test Veterans Recognition 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ATOMIC TESTING RECOGNITION RIBBON.

    (a) Design of Ribbon.--The Secretary of Defense shall design and 
produce a ribbon, to be known as the ``Atomic Testing Recognition 
Ribbon'', to honor all military veterans who were exposed to ionizing 
radiation as a result of atomic weapons tests conducted by the United 
States between 1945 and 1963.
    (b) Distribution of Ribbon.--The Secretary of Defense shall issue 
the Atomic Testing Recognition Ribbon to each person who, while a 
member of the Armed Forces serving on active duty, was exposed to 
ionizing radiation as a result of atomic weapons testing conducted by 
the United States between 1945 and 1963. In the case of any such person 
who is deceased, the ribbon shall be issued to the next-of-kin of such 
person
                                 <all>
```
### §1225. Effect on colleges and universities

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to impair or modify the legal relationship existing between any of the colleges or universities under whose direction an institute is established and the government of the State in which it is located, and nothing in this subchapter shall in any way be construed to authorize Federal control or direction of education at any college or university.

(Pub. L. 98–409, §5, Aug. 29, 1984, 98 Stat. 1539.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Mining and Mineral Resources Research Institute Act of 1984, and not as part of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 which comprises this chapter.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1225, Pub. L. 95–87, title III, §305, Aug. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 454, contained provisions similar to this section covering fiscal years 1978 through 1984.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 748 

To provide for an extension of the temporary suspension of Medicare 

sequestration during the COVID–19 public health emergency. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2021 

Mrs. SHAHEEN (for herself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide for an extension of the temporary suspension 

of Medicare sequestration during the COVID–19 public 

health emergency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Sequester 

5 Relief Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF MEDI7 CARE SEQUESTRATION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3709(a) of division A of 

9 the CARES Act (2 U.S.C. 901a note), as amended by sec10 tion 102 of division N of the Consolidated Appropriations 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 748 IS

1 Act, 2021 (Public Law 116–136), is amended by striking 

2 ‘‘March 31, 2021’’ and inserting ‘‘the last day of the emer3 gency period described in section 1135(g)(1)(B) of the So4 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–5(g)(1)(B))’’. 

5 (b) EXTENSION OF DIRECT SPENDING REDUCTIONS

6 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2031.—Section 251A(6) of the 

7 Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 

8 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901a(6)) is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (B), in the matter pre10 ceding clause (i), by striking ‘‘through 2030’’ and 

11 inserting ‘‘through 2031’’; and 

12 (2) in subparagraph (C), in the matter pre13 ceding clause (i), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2030’’ and 

14 inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2031’’. 

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall take effect as if enacted as part of the 

17 CARES Act (Public Law 116–136). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
D:\netsite-docs\lps96949\WorkshopReportFinal.pdf
Exhibit 31.3

OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP.

A LOUISIANA CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Gregory B. Milton, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of OMNI Energy Services Corp., a Louisiana corporation (the registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2006



|                        
|------------------------
|                        
|/s/    GREGORY B. MILTON
|Gregory B. Milton       
|Chief Accounting Officer
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-01-024 June 1, 2001

CONTACT: Breck Henderson 

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH WOLF CREEK TO DISCUSS

SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of Wolf Creek Nuclear

Operating Company on Thursday, June 7, to discuss the results of NRC's annual assessment of safety

performance at the Wolf Creek nuclear power plant.

The meeting will be held at 3:30 p.m. at the Dwight D. Eisenhower Learning Center, 16775

Milo Lane N.E., Burlington, Kansas. The public is invited to observe the meeting. NRC officials will

be available after the meeting to answer questions.

A letter sent from NRC Region IV to Wolf Creek, which addresses plant safety performance

during the previous year and forms the basis of the meeting discussion, is available from the Region IV

Office of Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr/. Current safety

performance information for Wolf Creek is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/WC/wc_chart.html.

###