alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 162.75 Seizures limited under section 592, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. ( a ) *When authorized.* Merchandise may be seized for violation of section 592, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1592) *only* if the port director has reasonable cause to believe that a person has violated the statute and that ( 1 ) The person is insolvent,
( 2 ) The person is beyond the jurisdiction of the United States,
( 3 ) Seizure otherwise is essential to protect the revenue, or
( 4 ) Seizure is essential to prevent the introduction of prohibited or restricted merchandise into the Customs territory of the United States.
( b ) *No seizure if prior disclosure.* Under no circumstances shall merchandise be seized under the authority of 19 U.S.C. 1592 if there has been a prior disclosure of the violation. This paragraph does not limit seizures under the authority of any other applicable law or regulation.
( c ) *Seizure notice.* If merchandise is seized, the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer shall promptly issue a written notice of seizure to the person concerned and to any other person the facts of record indicate has an interest in the merchandise. The seizure notice shall contain the information required by § 162.31 and shall state why the seizure was necessary.
( d ) *Release of seized merchandise* — ( 1 ) *To person from whom seized.* The Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer shall return seized mechandise to the person from whom seized upon the deposit of security, in a form acceptable to the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer, equal to the maximum penalty which may be assessed, if the entry of the merchandise into the commerce of the United States is not prohibited or restricted.
( 2 ) *To others.* The Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer may release seized merchandise to any other person upon the deposit of adequate security, in a form acceptable to the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer, if the entry of the merchandise into the commerce of the United States is not prohibited or restricted, and if: ( i ) The Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer is satisfied that the person has a substantial interest in the merchandise, and
( ii ) The person submits either an agreement to hold the United States and its officers and employees harmless, or a release from the owner and/or the person from whom the merchandise was seized.
( 3 ) *Forfeiture.* If neither a petition for relief is filed in accordance with part 171 of this chapter, nor compliance made with the decision within the time provided by law, the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer immediately shall report the facts and refer the case to the Department of Justice for the institution of court proceedings.
[T.D. 72-211, 37 FR 16488, Aug. 15, 1972, as amended by T.D. 84-18, 49 FR 1679, Jan. 13, 1984; T.D. 85-90, 50 FR 21431, May 24, 1985; T.D. 86-118, 51 FR 22516, June 20, 1986; T.D. 88-43, 53 FR 28195, July 27, 1988; T.D. 99-27, 64 FR 13676, Mar. 22, 1999]
Exhibit 12.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/RULE 15d-14(a) under

the
Exchange Act



I, Guy Bernstein, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 of Formula Systems
(1985) Ltd. (the “Registrant”);
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: June 30, 2015 | /s/ Guy Bernstein      
|------------------- | -----------------------
|                    | Guy Bernstein          
|                    | Chief Executive Officer
### §4552. Certificates to pay rolls of employees of House

The Clerk, Sergeant at Arms, and Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives shall make certificate each month to their respective pay rolls, stating whether the persons named in such pay rolls and employed in their respective departments have been actually present at their respective places of duty and have actually performed the services for which compensation is provided in said pay rolls, and in each case where a person carried on such pay roll has been absent and has not performed the services in whole or in part for which payment is proposed, the reason for such absence and for such nonperformance of services shall be stated.

(Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 830, §1, 31 Stat. 968; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §204(41), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1736.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 89 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "and Chief Administrative Officer" for "Doorkeeper, and Postmaster".
§ 143.13 Documents to be presented with entry. The importer shall in all cases present: ( a ) Any bills or statements of cost, or their electronic equivalents, relating to the merchandise which may be in his possession; and
( b ) A declaration, or its electronic equivalent, that he has no other information as to the value of the articles and is unable to obtain such information or to determine the value of the articles for the purpose of making formal entry thereof.
[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17463, July 2, 1973, as amended by CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61289, Oct. 13, 2015]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 20-cv-22906-UU

WINDY LUCIUS,

Plaintiff,

v.

GIARDINO ENTERPRISES, LLC,

Defendant.

/

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), with no responsive pleadings having yet been 

filed by Defendant, Plaintiff Windy Lucius hereby gives notice that she voluntarily dismisses all 

claims against Defendant with prejudice, and requests this Court to terminate the action.

Dated: September 14, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

s/ J. Courtney Cunningham

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

FBN: 628166

 8950 SW 74th Court, Suite 2201

Miami, Florida 33156

Telephone: (305) 351-2014

cc@cunninghampllc.com

Counsel for Plaintiff Windy Lucius

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 14, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system.

/s/ J. Courtney Cunningham

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

Case 1:20-cv-22906-UU Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/14/2020 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

 CASE NO.: 20-CV-81205-RAR 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

v. 

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP, 

 INC. d/b/a/ PAR FUNDING, et al., 

____________________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF FILING 

Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission hereby files the indictment unsealed today 

in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Complete Business Solutions Group (“CBSG”) 

(which is in the receivership in this case), Lisa McElhone, Joseph LaForte, and Joseph Cole 

Barleta, as well as James LaForte. The indictment includes 63 charges as well as two forfeiture 

counts, including a forfeiture count against CBSG and individual defendants in this case for about 

$416 million. 

May 23, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

 By: s/ Amie Riggle Berlin 

 Amie Riggle Berlin 

 Senior Trial Counsel 

 Florida Bar No. 630020 

 Direct Dial: (305) 982-6322 

 Email: berlina@sec.gov 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

 COMMISSION 

 801 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1800 

 Miami, Florida 33131 

 Telephone: (305) 982-6300 

 Facsimile: (305) 536-4154 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1569 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/23/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served this 23rd day 

of May 2023 via cm-ecf on all defense counsel in this case. 

 s/ Amie Riggle Berlin 

 Amie Riggle Berlin 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1569 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/23/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### NORTHWEST GUARDIANSHIP SERVICES as Administrator of the Estate of BUTLER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patricia NESBITT, Defendant-Appellant, and Woodrow G. Burley, Appellant.

No. 01-35799.

D.C. No. CV-01-00850-MJP.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 29, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, WARDLAW, and W. FLETGKER, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, the request for oral argument is denied.

MEMORANDUM **

Patricia Nesbitt and Woodrow Burley appeal pro se the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice the Washington state unlawful detainer action which Burley attempted to remove. We have appellate jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We vacate the district court’s order and dismiss the federal proceedings for lack of jurisdiction.

VACATED and DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-115 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, July 9, 1998)

COMMISSION TO MEET WITH STAKEHOLDERS JULY 17

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with several

invited stakeholders Friday, July 17, to discuss concerns about

the NRC’s regulatory program.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, will begin at

9:30 a.m. It will be held in the meeting room of the Advisory

Committee on Reactor Safeguards (Room 2B3) of the NRC

headquarters Two White Flint North building, 11545 Rockville

Pike, Rockville, Md. NRC’s headquarters complex is near the

White Flint station on the Washington Metro Red Line at the

intersection of Rockville Pike and Marinelli Road.

The meeting has been scheduled to address stakeholder

concerns and issues with respect to the agency’s processes and

approach. Accordingly, the Commission has asked those invited to

comment on the nuclear reactor and spent fuel programs,

specifically concerning inspection and enforcement, use of

performance indicators and performance assessment, risk informed

regulations and regulatory policies, and timeliness of NRC

processes.

The Commission is interested in conducting a comprehensive

dialogue with the invitees on these topics during the session,

which will be in a round-table format. Those who will be taking

part have been asked to provide examples to illustrate their

particular concerns and to propose solutions.

Among those participating, in addition to the three

Commissioners, will be:

ˇ Erle Nye, chairman and chief executive officer of Texas

Utilities and chairman of the Nuclear Energy Institute;
-2-

ˇ Joe F. Colvin, president and chief executive officer of

the Nuclear Energy Institute;

ˇ Corbin A. McNeill Jr., president and chief executive

officer of PECO Energy Co. and a director of the

Nuclear Energy Institute;

ˇ Zack T. Pate, chairman of the World Association of

Nuclear Operators.

ˇ Harold B. Ray, executive vice president, Southern

California Edison Co.

ˇ David A. Lochbaum, nuclear safety engineer, Union of

Concerned Scientists.

ˇ Dr. Forrest J. Remick, former NRC Commissioner and

former associate vice president for research and

professor of nuclear engineering, The Pennsylvania

State University.

ˇ L. Joseph Callan, Executive Director for Operations,

NRC.

ˇ Sam Collins, Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation, NRC.

ˇ Karen Cyr, General Counsel, NRC.

###
### §126a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 86–628, July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 447, related to appointment of reporters, transcribers and other employees by Official Reporter of Debates of Senate. See section 6539 of this title.
### §61a–9. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 61a–9 was editorially reclassified as section 6565 of this title.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

 

CASE NO. 20-14202-CIV-MIDDLEBOOKS/MAYNARD 

DAVID POSCHMANN, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

 

ZERBY HOTEL, LLC 

 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________/ 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

The parties stipulate and agree that this action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each side to bear his/its own fees and costs 

except as otherwise agreed. 

August 7, 2020 

s/Drew M. Levitt

Drew M. Levitt 

Florida Bar No. 782246 

drewmlevitt@gmail.com 

Lee D. Sarkin 

Florida Bar No. 962848 

lsarkin@aol.com 

4700 N.W. Boca Raton Boulevard 

Suite 302 

Boca Raton, Florida 33431 

Telephone (561) 994-6922 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

s/Jesse I. Unruh

Jesse I. Unruh 

Florida Bar No. 91121 

jesse@spirelawfirm.com 

Spire Law, LLC 

2572 W. State Road 426, Suite 2088 

Telephone (407) 494-0135 

Oviedo, Florida 32765 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Case 2:20-cv-14202-DMM Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2020 Page 1 of 1
8/15/22, 10:10 PM SCI KKM Barrel original.png

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-AmTCU89l4te-MA672OMFe_aXJ8CXsHA 1/1

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-44 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 2
8/15/22, 10:11 PM SCI KKM Barrel new.png

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-AmTCU89l4te-MA672OMFe_aXJ8CXsHA 1/1

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-44 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 2 of 2
### §6318. Additional home State office space for Senators; declaration of disaster or emergency

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law or regulation, with the approval of the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate, the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate is authorized to provide additional facilities, services, equipment, and office space for use by a Senator in that Senator's State in connection with a disaster or emergency declared by the President under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act [42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.]. Expenses incurred by the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate under this section shall be paid from the appropriation account, within the contingent fund of the Senate, for expenses of the Office of the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate, upon vouchers signed by the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate with the approval of the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate.

(b) This section is effective on and after June 12, 1997.

(Pub. L. 105–18, title II, §7002, June 12, 1997, 111 Stat. 192.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 93–288, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 143, which is classified principally to chapter 68 (§5121 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5121 of Title 42 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 59–1 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.255 Filing of claim for preferential treatment. ( a ) *Declaration.* In connection with a claim for preferential treatment for an article described in § 10.253(a), the importer must make a written declaration that the article qualifies for that treatment. The written declaration should be made by including on the entry summary, or equivalent documentation, the symbol “J + ” as a prefix to the subheading of the HTSUS in which the article in question is classified. Except in any of the circumstances described in § 10.256(d)(1), the declaration required under this paragraph must be based on a complete and properly executed original Certificate of Origin that covers the article being imported and that is in the possession of the importer.
( b ) *Corrected declaration.* If, after making the declaration required under paragraph (a) of this section, the importer has reason to believe that a Certificate of Origin on which a declaration was based contains information that is not correct, the importer must within 30 calendar days after the date of discovery of the error make a corrected declaration and pay any duties that may be due. A corrected declaration will be effected by submission of a letter or other written statement to the Customs port where the declaration was originally filed.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00016-CV

GUARDIANSHIP OF LEON R. BERNSEN SR., AN INCAPACITATED PERSON

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2015-GU-00099-5

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 30, 2021
05/14/2012 14:38 FAX 2024835142 FAA + OMS ll!001/001 

## Of • fl**~..#.·** _21• .1• 

### ·

### ~~·'\;\,c!fl'll 

# ,.,'llet,re C7"'J 

# 11'1t11es**,__;~** ,. l J56 DiAblo Road, Suite l03 Danville, CA 945l6 

### 'i i \.\ 

### 3: 3bTel: 92S..J62-4430, Fax: 925-362·4432 

### ?.n\Z

May4, 2012
Federal Aviation Administration &00 Independence Avenue, SW Attn: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC·430 Wilbur Wright Building, Room 2Wt000 Washington, DC. 20591 RE: Case No. 2011WP3S0018 

### Dear Sirs: 

# tRECEIVED MAY 10

## 2012 

# l-IEARING DOCKET

Aero Micronesia, Inc. is doing business as Asia Pacific Airlines. I formally request a hearing in this matter in accordancewith Subpart G ofPart 13 ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations with the understanding that a complaint 

### will be filed. We request that the hearing be held in Washington, DC. I am sending this request to boththe FAA attorney and the Federal Aviation Administration at 800 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington DC. Sincerely,

# ~~- ...

# --- Michael R. Qui·nn President Aero Micronesia, Tnc.

/'"' I**~I** . (**~** • i I •
§ 176.31 Reliquidation following decision of court. ( a ) *Decision of U.S. Court of International Trade.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, an entry which is the subject of a decision of the U.S. Court of International Trade shall be reliquidated in accordance with the judgment order thereon at the expiration of 60 days from the date of the decision, unless an appeal or motion for a rehearing is filed. However, entries which are the subject of decisions of the court following a decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit which involve the same issue, or which are based on submission of an agreed statement of fact, may be reliquidated immediately upon receipt of the judgment orders from the U.S. Court of International Trade.
( b ) *Decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, an entry covering merchandise which is the subject of a decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall be reliquidated at the expiration of 90 days from the date of entry of decision by that court and only upon receipt of the judgment order from the U.S. Court of International Trade. However, no such entry shall be reliquidated pursuant to such order if a petition for certiorari is taken to the Supreme Court.
( c ) *Waiver of right of appeal.* Upon receipt of a letter from the Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Department of Justice, signed by the Chief, Customs Section, advising that no appeal will be taken from a decision of the U.S. Court of International Trade or that it has been determined that no petition for certiorari shall be filed in the Supreme Court to review a decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, any entry or entries covered by such decision may be reliquidated pursuant to the judgment of the U.S. Court of International Trade prior to the expiration of the times specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
(Sec. 514, 46 Stat. 734, as amended; 19 U.S.C. 1514)
[T.D. 70-181, 35 FR 13433, Aug. 22, 1970, as amended by T.D. 85-90, 50 FR 21430, May 24, 1985]