alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10(xxiv)

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 3
                                     TO THE
                         KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC.
                      EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

     WHEREAS, Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. (the "Company") maintains the
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the
"Plan") as amended and restated effective October 1, 1999 for the benefit of its
eligible employees; and

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan, with the consent of the
participants therein, to revise the definition of "Special Circumstance":

     NOW THEREFORE, effective February 12, 2002, Section 1.24 of the Plan is
hereby amended to read as follows:

          1.24 Special Circumstance means, effective February 12, 2002, the
     reporting by K&S of consolidated net losses equal to or in excess of
     $200,000,000, over a measuring period not exceeding two fiscal years of K&S
     (beginning with a fiscal year in which a loss for the year is reported). A
     Special Circumstance shall be deemed to occur on the date on which K&S
     makes an announcement of quarterly or annual earnings showing consolidated
     net losses, which together with losses reported previously during the
     measuring period, equal or exceed such $200,000,000 amount.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 3 to be
executed by its duly authorized officers this 12/th/ day of February 2002.

[Corporate Seal]                            KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES, INC.



Attest:__________________                   By:_____________________________
###### Editorial Note on Part 120

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

#### § 120.940 Prepayment of the 504 loan or Debenture.

The Borrower may prepay its 504 loan, if it pays the entire principal balance, unpaid interest, any unpaid fees, and any prepayment premium established in the note. If the Borrower prepays, the CDC must prepay the corresponding Debenture with interest and premium. If one of the Debentures in a Debenture Pool is prepaid, the Investors in that Debenture Pool must be paid pro rata, and SBA's guarantee on the entire Debenture Pool must be proportionately reduced. If the entire Debenture Pool is paid off, SBA may call all Certificates backed by the Pool for redemption.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO: ?_ o _ V\,\J ~ O ?3CJ~ - lor?.,us 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

,A(,~ fu VC1 /(aJc,H'J (J /re e (..__ _____________ ! 

WAIVER OF PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION 

AND EXCLUSION OF TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT 

The defendant, having been advised of his right to a preliminary 

hearing or examination as to probable cause, and the defendant, 

having refused and waived a preliminary examination, 

The defendant now signs this Waiver of Preliminary Examination 

through ~'-'OV'( {).6 ,;;.._ cJ J , and agrees that thi time will be 

excluded from the computation of the time within ich an · nd · c 

or information must be filed, under 18 U.S.C 6 

DATED: l O (°' I /Budd Defendant: 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S CERTIFICATE 

The undersigned United States Magistrate Judge certifies that 

the defendant, after being advised of his right to a preliminary 

examination, stated he refused and waived such preliminary 

examination and signed the foregoing Waiver of Preliminary 

Examination. 

IT IS ORDERED that a preliminary examination in the 

above-entitled matter is waived through 

and based upon interests of justice, this time is excluded from the 

computation of the time within which an indictment or information 

must be filed under the ,speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3161. 

Dated: 

ALICIA M. OTAZO-REYES 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

At MIAMI, FLORIDA 

1/26/21

10/22/20

Case 1:20-mj-03308-EGT Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/22/2020 Page 1 of 1
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-98-15 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Tuesday, February 24, 1998)

NRC STAFF TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS WITH

PHYSICIAN AND HOSPITAL IN PUERTO RICO ON MARCH 2

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled two predecisional enforcement

conferences, one with José N. De León, M.D. and the other with Ryder Memorial Hospital,

to discuss apparent violations related to the use of radioactive material (strontium-90) in

an eye applicator.

NRC inspections at the hospital in Humacao and at Dr. De León’s office in Isla Verde found

that from 1994 to 1996 some patients were given the wrong doses of radiation during

treatment.

The NRC has identified two apparent violations for Ryder Memorial Hospital -- (1) failure

to establish and implement a Quality Management Program for the use of strontium-90 in

ophthalmic brachytherapy between July 1994 and February 1996; and (2) failure to include

an authorized user on the radiation safety committee membership. Dr. De León is being

asked to respond to one apparent violation -- the failure to establish and maintain Quality

Management Program procedures for the use of strontium-90 in ophthalmic brachytherapy

between July 1994 and June 1996.

The meetings will be held at the Hampton Inn, 6530 Isla Verde Road, Carolina, Puerto

Rico. The enforcement conference for Dr. De León begins at 9:00 a.m. and the

conference for Ryder Memorial Hospital begins at 10:30 a.m. The meetings are open to

observation by the public and the media, and NRC officials will be available at their

conclusion to answer questions from interested observers.

NRC officials said the decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not

mean that a determination has been made that a violation has occurred or that

enforcement action will be taken. The purpose of the conferences is to discuss apparent

violations, their causes and safety significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to

point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to enable

the licensee to outline proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action, such as

a civil penalty, will be made at these conferences. Those decisions will be made later by

senior NRC officials.

#
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION

CASE NO.: 20-cv-61690-SINGHAL

DEBRON WALLEN, 

SANJAY SHAKES, Individually and

On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

SVENSK MANAGEMENT, INC. &

RICHARD FERNBACH,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS

Defendant SVENSK MANAGEMENT, INC., and Defendant RICHARD FERNBACH., 

hereby gives notice of the appearance of Aaron Reed, Esq. of Littler Mendelson, P.C., as counsel 

for Defendants in the instant action. Defendants respectfully request that Mr. Reed’s appearance 

be reflected in the Court’s docket report and that all pleadings, notices and correspondence be 

sent to Mr. Reed, whose contact information is as follows:

Aaron Reed

Littler Mendelson, P.C.

Wells Fargo Center

333 S.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 2700

Miami, Florida 33131

Tel: (305) 400-7500

Fax: (305) 603-2552

E-mail: areed@littler.com

Case 0:20-cv-61690-AHS Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

DATED this 20th day of October 2020. Respectfully submitted,

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

Wells Fargo Center

333 S.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 2700

Miami, Florida 33131

Tel: (305) 400-7500

Fax: (305) 603-2552

By: /s/ Aaron Reed

Aaron Reed

Florida Bar No. 0557153

E-mail: areed@littler.com

Stella S. Chu

Florida Bar No. 060519

E-mail: sschu@littler.com

Counsel for Defendants

4813-8594-4271.1 109338.1001

Case 0:20-cv-61690-AHS Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2020 Page 2 of 2
#### § 148.27 Receipt for payment.

When duties and internal revenue taxes on articles in a passenger's baggage are collected, a receipt on Customs Form 368 or 368A shall be issued to the passenger if such duties and taxes are paid in cash. If such duties and taxes are paid by personal check, the check shall be the passenger's receipt unless a receipt is requested.

[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. 92-56, 57 FR 24944, June 12, 1992]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA three-node C deg element for analysis of laminated composite sandwich shellsA three-node flat shell element with C deg rotation fields has been developed for analysis of arbitrary composite shells. The element may consist of any number of orthotropic layers, each layer having different material properties and angular orientation. The formulation includes coupling between bending and extension, which is essential for analysis of unsymmetric laminates. Shearing deflections are included, since laminated and sandwich construction frequently results in shear stiffness much smaller than bending stiffness. Formulation of the element is straightforward, and calculation of its stiffness matrix is simple and fast. Convergence of solutions with mesh refinement is uniform for both thin and thick shells and is insensitive to element shape, although not as rapid as some other elements that lack one or more capabilities of the newly developed element. An experimental verification of the shall element is reported in the appendix.Document ID19890017842Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMartin, C. Wayne*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Lung, S. F.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Gupta, K. K.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1989Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberH-1479NAS 1.15:4125NASA-TM-4125Accession Number89N27213Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 533-02-51Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19890017842.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 21



Midas, Inc.

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

As of December 31, 2005



|                                         |  |                       |  |                                                     |  
|---------------------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------- | -
|Name                                     |  | Place ofIncorporation |  | Percent of StockOwned orControlled bythe Registrant |  
|Midas, Inc. (Registrant)                 |  | Delaware              |  | 100                                                 | %
|Midas International Corporation          |  | Delaware              |  | 100                                                 | %
|Midas Illinois, Inc.                     |  | Illinois              |  | 100                                                 | %
|Midas Realty Corporation                 |  | Delaware              |  | 100                                                 | %
|Midas Properties, Inc.                   |  | New York              |  | 100                                                 | %
|Muffler Corporation of America           |  | Illinois              |  | 100                                                 | %
|Dealers Wholesale, Inc.                  |  | Delaware              |  | 100                                                 | %
|Huth, Inc.                               |  | Delaware              |  | 100                                                 | %
|International Parts Corporation          |  | Delaware              |  | 100                                                 | %
|Midas International Corporation (Wyo)    |  | Wyoming               |  | 100                                                 | %
|Progressive Automotive Systems, Inc.     |  | Delaware              |  | 100                                                 | %
|Cosmic Holdings LLC                      |  | Delaware              |  | 100                                                 | %
|MDS Automotive Holdings, B.V.            |  | Netherlands           |  | 100                                                 | %
|Midas Automotive International, B.V.     |  | Netherlands           |  | 100                                                 | %
|Midas Canada Holdings Ltd                |  | Canada                |  | 100                                                 | %
|Midas Canada Inc.                        |  | Canada                |  | 100                                                 | %
|Midas Realty Corporation of Canada, Inc. |  | Canada                |  | 100                                                 | %
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-69 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, May 12, 1998)

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING IN PENNSYLVANIA

ON DECOMMISSIONING OF B&W SHALLOW LAND DISPOSAL AREA

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting May 27 in

Leechburg, Pennsylvania, to discuss the decommissioning of the Babcock and Wilcox (B&W)

shallow land disposal area in Parks Township, Pennsylvania.

The meeting, which will be held in the Leechburg High School Cafeteria on Siberian

Avenue, will begin at 7:00 p.m. and end at 9:30 p.m. It will consist of a facilitated discussion,

followed by an opportunity for comments by interested members of the public.

The B&W shallow land disposal area consists of ten waste disposal trenches on about

1.2 acres, surrounded by a 40-acre fenced buffer area. The disposal area was formerly owned

by Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation (NUMEC), which also operated the nearby

Apollo Nuclear Fuel Fabrication Facility. In the l960s and l970s, the Parks Township disposal

area was used by NUMEC to dispose of radioactively contaminated wastes (primarily uranium

and thorium) and non-radioactive wastes, in accordance with NRC regulations then in effect. In

1967, Atlantic Richfield Company purchased stock in NUMEC and subsequently sold it to B&W

in 1971.

###
#### Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Litteral’s Adm’r.

May 18, 1945.

*25LeWright Browning and Wells *&*Wells for appellant.

W. J. Ward for appellee.

Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner

—Reversing.

The entire testimony on material facts of this case is merely that Mrs. Jess Fairchild, who lived by the defendant’s railroad tracks, in the early afternoon of December 6, 1943, saw Powell Litteral pass her house walking on the track “with a'bundle under his arm and a poke in his hand. ’ ’ About two hours later she was asked by a man who was employed as a railroad brakeman if she knew the man that was killed, adding, “We didn’t kill him.” As she went down the track, another man on a caboose asked her if she knew the man. Two trains, a slow coal train and a fast passenger train, had passed during the intervening two hours.. Mrs. Gladiolus 0 ’Neil testified that about this time she was on the railroad right of way and that a train passed her “going so fast it made me scream.” Other witnesses related the finding of Litteral’s body on the side of the track with abrasions or lacerations on his head, a broken leg, and perhaps other bruises.

Upon this evidence the court submitted the case under an instruction which, in substance, directed the jury to find a verdict in favor of Litteral’s .administrator if they believed from the evidence that the servants in charge of “the train” saw the deceased on its track and carelessly and negligently ran it over or. against. him and thereby killed him; and unless they so believed to find for the defendant.

From the beginning of suits of this kind, this Court has held that a case should not be submitted to the jury where there was only surmise that the deceased person had been struck by a train, or where there was no evidence of negligence. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur certainly has never been applied. It has been a con*26sistent declaration that where a person who was in possession of .all his faculties is found dead on a railroad right of way, although evidently killed by a train, no presumption of negligence on the part of the company arises, especially where the person killed was a trespasser. An early case is Louisville, St. L. & T. Ry. Co. v. Terry’s Adm’x, 47 S. W. 588, 20 Ky. Law Rep. 803. A late case is Byrge’s Adm’x v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 294 Ky. 366, 171 S. W. 2d 1010.

A peremptory instruction to find for the defendant should have been given. There is no need to point out the serious defects in the instructions that were given.

Judgment reversed.
#### § 111.68 Proposed findings and conclusions.

The hearing officer will allow the parties a reasonable period of time after delivery of the transcript of record in which to submit proposed findings and conclusions and supporting reasons for the findings as contemplated by 5 U.S.C. 557(c).
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-35 September 7, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC WORKSHOP IN SAN LUIS OBISPO

ON HANDLING OF DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINTS

The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold the third in a series of workshops to

review with the public its handling of complaints by nuclear industry workers who allege they have

been discriminated against by their employer after raising safety concerns.

The workshop will be held on Thursday, September 14, beginning at 7 p.m., at the Embassy

Suites Hotel, 333 Madonna Rd., San Luis Obispo, Calif.

The agency's procedures for handling discrimination allegations and complaints are described

in various parts of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the NRC enforcement policy, and other

agency guidelines. The overall objective of the employee protection regulations is to promote an

atmosphere in which employees feel comfortable raising safety concerns without fear of reprisal. Thus,

effective and consistent NRC handling of discrimination cases is an important element in insuring a

safety-conscious work environment.

The NRC has formed a Discrimination Task Group to review the way the agency handles

discrimination complaints filed by nuclear industry workers and recommend possible changes to

the agency's regulations, enforcement policy or other agency guidelines. The Task Group also

will consider issues raised in a petition for rulemaking filed by the Union of Concerned

Scientists filed in October 1999. The petition asks the Commission to require that nuclear plant

operators provide training for their management on implementing employee protection regulations.

The public workshops are being held to help evaluate agency policies and to develop

recommendations to enhance employee protection. Draft recommendations from the Task Group will

be published about middle of next year for public comment.

The workshop will not be transcribed, but summaries will be available from the NRC Public

Document Room, telephone: 202/634-3273. The group's charter and other pertinent documents related

to its activities will be periodically posted at: http://www.nrc.gov/OE on the agency's web site.

Additional information about upcoming meetings can be obtained by calling Barry Westreich at (301)

415-3456 or via e-mail: BCW@nrc.gov.
###
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-01-031 July 9, 2001 

 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH SCE&G OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS

SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT SUMMER NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with South Carolina Electric & Gas

officials on Tuesday, July 17, to discuss the results of NRC's annual assessment of safety performance

at the Summer nuclear power plant.

The meeting will be held at 2:00 p.m. in the 2nd Floor Cafeteria of the Nuclear Operations

Building at the plant site near Jenkinsville, South Carolina. The public is invited to observe the

meeting. NRC officials will be available after the meeting to answer questions. The NRC will hold a

second meeting with state and local government officials after the first meeting. That second meeting

is also open to the public.

A letter sent from NRC Region II to SCE&G, which addresses plant safety performance during

the previous year and forms the basis of the meeting discussion, is available from the Region II Office

of Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr. Current information for the plant

is available at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SUM/sum_chart.html.

###
#### Salome A. Flanagan, as General Guardian for Francis A. Flanagan, Jr., and Another, Respondent, v. William O’Dwyer et al., Constituting the Board of Estimate of the City of New York, as Trustees of the New York City Employees’ Retirement System, et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
September 1, 2006 

Terry Frazee, Western Regional Director 


NRC Chronology Identificatio n FR Notic e (Date Du e For State Imple mentaion) RATS ID o
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.198b Products of Puerto Rico processed in a beneficiary country. Except in the case of any article described in § 10.191(b)(2)(i) through (vi), the duty-free treatment provided for under the CBI will apply to an article that is the growth, product, or manufacture of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and that is by any means advanced in value or improved in condition in a beneficiary country, provided that: ( a ) If any materials are added to the article in the beneficiary country, those materials consist only of materials that are a product of a beneficiary country or the United States; and
( b ) The article is imported directly from the beneficiary country into the customs territory of the United States within the meaning of § 10.193.
[T.D. 00-68, 65 FR 59658, Oct. 5, 2000]
### §606. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–306, title III, §311, Oct. 14, 1982, 96 Stat. 1442; Pub. L. 97–375, title I, §110(a), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1820

Section, Pub. L. 90–83, §6(f), Sept. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 221, directed Secretary of Labor to report to Congress not later than Jan. 15 of each year the number of cases reviewed under this chapter and the number of certificates issued.