alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 148.23 Examination and clearance of baggage. ( a ) *Articles free of duty.* The inspector, including inspectors on trains or ferries, who examines the baggage of any person arriving in the United States may examine and pass, without limitation as to value, the following articles in such baggage or otherwise accompanying such person: ( 1 ) All articles which are for the personal or household use of the arriving person and are free of duty under Chapter 98, Subchapter IV, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) (19 U.S.C. 1202), including automobiles and other articles under § 148.32.
( 2 ) Works of art classifiable under subheadings 9701.10.00 or 9701.90.00, HTSUS.
( 3 ) Works of art classifiable under subheadings 9702.00.00 or 9703.00.00, HTSUS, upon compliance with § 10.48 of this chapter.
( b ) *Articles subject to duty.* The inspector who examines the baggage of any person arriving in the United States may examine, determine the dutiable value of, collect duty on, and pass articles accompanying the arriving person which are for his personal or household use but are subject to duty, including articles imported to be disposed of by him as bona fide gifts.
( c ) *Articles not for personal use* — ( 1 ) *Valued at not more than $2,500 (with exceptions).* The inspector may also examine, determine the dutiable value of, collect duty on, and pass articles accompanying any person arriving in the United States properly listed on the baggage declaration which are not for the personal or household use of the declarant or which are intended for sale or are brought in on commission for another, provided the aggregate value of such articles is not more than $2,500 (except for articles valued in excess of $250 classified in Chapter 99, Subchapter III and IV, HTSUS).
( 2 ) *Valued over $2,500 (with exceptions).* Articles in the baggage of or otherwise accompanying any person arriving in the United States which have an aggregate value over $2,500 (except for articles valued in excess of $250 classified in Chapter 99, Subchapters III and IV, HTSUS) and are not intended for his personal or household use, or are intended for sale or are brought in on commission for another, may be examined and entered and cleared on a baggage declaration at the place of their arrival with a passenger if: ( i ) The articles are accompanied by a proper invoice if one is required (see § 141.83 of this chapter); and
( ii ) It is practicable to appraise the articles at the place of arrival.
( d ) *Examination of tea for personal use imported in baggage.* Tea for personal use in one or more packages weighing not more than 5 pounds each, when imported in a passenger's baggage, may be delivered without examination for purity under 21 U.S.C. 41-50 and without payment of the examination fee prescribed in 21 U.S.C. 46a.
[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. 84-149, 49 FR 28699, July 16, 1984; T.D. 86-118, 51 FR 22516, June 20, 1986; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51264, Dec. 21, 1988; T.D. 89-82, 54 FR 36026, Aug. 31, 1989; T.D. 98-28, 63 FR 16417, Apr. 3, 1998; CBP Dec. 12-19, 77 FR 72721, Dec. 6, 2012]
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.461 Retail packaging materials and containers.

Packaging materials and containers in which a good is packaged for retail sale, if classified with the good for which preferential tariff treatment under the US-CFTA is claimed, will be disregarded in determining whether all non-originating materials used in the production of the good undergo the applicable change in tariff classification set out in General Note 26(n), HTSUS. If the good is subject to a regional value content requirement, the value of such packaging materials and containers will be taken into account as originating or non-originating materials, as the case may be, in calculating the regional value content of the good.

# Example 1.

Chilean Producer A of good C imports 100 non-originating blister packages to be used as retail packaging for good C. As provided in § 10.455(a)(1), the value of the blister packages is their adjusted value, which in this case is $10. Good C has a regional value content requirement. The United States importer of good C decides to use the build-down method, RVC = ((AV-VNM)/AV) × 100 (*see* § 10.454(a) of this subpart), in determining whether good C satisfies the regional value content requirement. In applying this method, the non-originating blister packages are taken into account as non-originating. As such, their $10 adjusted value is included in the VNM, value of non-originating materials, of good C.

# Example 2.

Same facts as in Example 1, but the blister packages are originating. In this case, the adjusted value of the originating blister packages would not be included as part of the VNM of good C under the build-down method. However, if the United States importer had used the build-up method, RVC = (VOM/AV) × 100 (*see* § 10.454(b)), the adjusted value of the blister packaging would be included as part of the VOM, value of originating material.

[CBP Dec. 05-07, 70 FR 10873, Mar. 7, 2005, as amended by CBP Dec. 06-39, 71 FR 76134, Dec. 20, 2006]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

ALLAN GARFINKEL, CASE NO:

0:20-cv-61617-AHS

Plaintiff,

Vs.

SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

STATE OF FLORIDA

COUNTY OF BROWARD

CERTIFICATE OF NON-APPEARANCE

I, Chere Barton, FPR, a Notary Public in and for the

State of Florida at Large, present via Zoom with Chancey

Smith, Esquire and Jana Rauf, Esquire, do hereby certify

That on August 19, 2021 at 2:00 p.m., the Corporate

Representative of Leak Detector, Inc. Was scheduled to

Appear pursuant to Notice of Taking Rule 30(b)(6)

Deposition Duces Tecum, and at 2:30 p.m. the

Aforementioned witness(s) failed to appear.

Dated this 19th day of August, 2021.

/s/ Chere J. Barton, FPR

CHERE J. BARTON, FPR

Notary Public

State of Florida at Large

My Commission No: #HH 033431

My Commission Expires: 12/17/24

Exhibit "B"

Case 0:20-cv-61617-AHS Document 32-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2021 Page 1 of 1
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-02-0179 - Final Rule:  Material Control and Accounting Amendments

Accession Number: ML011610005

Date Released: Tuesday, May 8, 2001

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML011280308 - SRM-SECY-01-0066  - "PROPOSED RULE: MATERIAL CONTROL AND ACCOUNTING AMENDMENTS." (3 page(s), 5/8/2001)
    - ML022170581 - SECY-02-0179 - Final Rule:  Material Control and Accounting Amendments (6 page(s), 10/2/2002)
    - ML022170472 - SECY-02-0179-Attachment 2-Draft Final Federal Register Notice - Final Rule Material Control and Accounting  Amendments (81 page(s), 10/2/2002)
    - ML022170488 - SECY-02-0179-Attachment 3-Draft Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for the Final Rule on Material Control and Accounting Amendments (4 page(s), 10/2/2002)
    - ML020250282 - SECY-02-0179-Attachment 4-SBREFA FORMS - Material Control and Accounting Amendments (6 page(s), 1/25/2002)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Alberto AGUILAR-CRISTALES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40854.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Carlos Alberto Aguilar-Cristales (Aguilar) pleaded guilty to being found illegally in the United States after deportation. Aguilar was sentenced to a 57-month term of imprisonment and to a two-year period of supervised release. Aguilar has appealed his conviction and sentence.

*264Aguilar contends that the imposition of a requirement that Aguilar cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample violates his rights under the Fourth Amendment. Because this issue is not ripe for review, this court does not have jurisdiction and this portion- of the appeal must be dismissed. *See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert, filed*(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662).

Aguilar challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). This argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-*Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Aguilar contends that *Almendarez-Torres*has been “impliedly overruled” by subsequent Supreme Court decisions, including *Apprendi,*“[tjhis court has repeatedly rejected arguments like the one made by [Aguilar] and has held that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding despite *Apprendi.” United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Aguilar concedes that the issue is foreclosed. He has raised the issue to preserve it for further review.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

Order 

June 30, 2021

162507-8

ALIAMA X. SCHAUMANN-BELTRAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 162507

COA: 347683

Washtenaw CC: 17-000132-NH

JOSEPH GEMMETE, M.D.,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

ALIAMA X. SCHAUMANN-BELTRAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 162508

COA: 347684

Ct of Claims: 17-000038-MH

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN REGENTS, d/b/a

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH

SYSTEM, a/k/a MICHIGAN MEDICINE,

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL

CENTER, and C.S. MOTT CHILDREN’S

HOSPITAL,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 10, 2020 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1). 

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief addressing whether the Court of 

Appeals correctly held that the trial court was not authorized, under MCR 2.311(A), to 

permit video recording of the neuropsychological examination. The appellant’s brief 

shall be filed by October 25, 2021, with no extensions except upon a showing of good 

cause. In the brief, citations to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as 

required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellees shall file a supplemental brief within 21 

days of being served with the appellant’s brief. A reply, if any, must be filed by the 
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 30, 2021

a0623

2

Clerk

appellant within 14 days of being served with the appellees’ brief. The parties should not 

submit mere restatements of their application papers.

BERNSTEIN, J., did not participate due to a familial relationship.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-44 April 27, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

ˇ ̨ ̋ ̧ ̊ ̋ ̨ ̊ ̧ ̇ ̆ ̋ ̨ ̄ ̃ˆ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ı ̆ÙÙ ̃ ̋ ̨ˇ ̧ ̊ı ̧ ̧ ̋ ̆ˇÛ ̃ ̊ ̃ÚÒ ̧ ̇ðÙ ̧ ̇

 ̋ ̊ˇ ̊ ̄ ̊Ú ̊  ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊  ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊

 ̊ı ̊ ̃ˆ

  ̋ ̊ˇ ̄Ú ̊ ̊ ̊  ̊ˇ ̊ð ̊ ̊Ù ̊Ò ̊Ú ̊ ̊ ̊

 ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊  ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊  ̊ı ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊

 ̊ ̊ ̊  ̊ı ̊ð ̊  ̊ ̊ ̋ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊  ̊ˆ ̊ ̊

ˆ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊Ú  ̊Ú ̊ ̄ ̊ ̊ ̨ ̊  ̊ ̊ ̊ ̄  ̊ı ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊

 ̊ ̊ ̊  ̊ ̊

ˇð ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊  ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊  ̊ ̊ ̊

 ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊  ̊ ̊ ̋ ̊ˇ ̄Ú

 ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊  ̊ ̊Ù ̊Ò ̊Ú ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ 

 ̊ ̊  ̊ ̊

 ̋ ̊ı ̊ð ̊ ̊ ̊  ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊Ú ̊ ̊  ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊Ú

 ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊  ̊ð ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ 

  ̨ ̊ ̋ ̊ı ̊ ̊ ̊ˆ ̊ ̊ ̊ˇ ̊ ̄ ̊Ú  ̊ ̃ ̊  ̊ ̨ ̊

 ̊ ̊ ̊  ̊ˇ ̊ð ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊  ̊ ̊ ̊ˇ ̄Ú ̊ ̨ ̊ ̃  ̊ ̋

 ̆ ̊ ̊ı ̊ð ̊ ̊ ̊   ̊Ú ̊ ̊ ̋ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊Ù ̊  ̊ ̊ ̃

 ̋ ̊Ú ̊ ̊ ̊ı ̊  ̊ ̊ ̆ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊  ̊  ̊ ̊

  ̨ ̊ı ̊ ̊ı ̊ ̊ ̊ˇ ̄Ú ̊ ̃ ̊  ̊ ̨ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊

 ̊ ̊ı ̊ ̊  ̊ ̊ ̋ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ˆ ̊  ̊ ̊ ̃ ̊Ú

ı ̊ ̄ ̊ ̊ ̊ı ̊Ú  ̊ ̊Ò ̊ ̄ ̊ ̊  

  ̨ ̊ ̋ ̊ı ̊ ̊ ̊ˆ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̃ ̊  ̊  ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊  ̊  ̊ˇ

ð ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊Û ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊  ̊ ̊ ̆ ̊Ú ̊

 ̊ ̊ ̊ı ̊  ̊ ̊ ̋ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊ ̊  ̊  ̊ ̊

 ̊ ̊ ̊ˇˇ ̧Ú ̨ ̊  ̊ ̊Ú ̊ ̃ ̊ ̊ˇ ̊  ̊Ú
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-120 November 2, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC STAFF AUTHORIZES POSTPONEMENT OF CORE SHROUD INSPECTION

AT NINE MILE POINT 1 NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Following a lengthy and detailed safety evaluation, the

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has approved Niagara Mohawk

Power Co.’s request to postpone an inspection of a reactor

component, the core shroud, at the Nine Mile Point 1 nuclear

power plant. Niagara Mohawk owns and operates the boilingwater reactor, located in Scriba, N.Y.

The core shroud is a large stainless-steel cylinder

that surrounds the reactor core and controls the flow of water

through it. Previous inspections of the component have

revealed cracking at vertical welds. (Contributing to such

cracking are operating time, coolant chemistry, carbon content,

neutron flux, residual stress from welding and fabrication and

operating stresses.)

Last February, Niagara Mohawk asked for permission to

inspect the core shroud after 14,500 hours of hot operation

(about 19 months) during the present operating cycle, rather

than after 10,600 hours (about 14 months), its earlier

commitment to the NRC. That extension would allow Nine Mile

Point 1 to stay on-line through the end of its current

operating cycle, until April 1999.

In a letter sent today to Niagara Mohawk, the NRC staff

informed the utility it found the proposed extension to be

acceptable, concluding there is reasonable assurance the plant

can be safely operated during the extension because “the

structural integrity of the vertical welds will be maintained

with safety margin(s) specified by the ASME (American Society

of Mechanical Engineers) Code.” The agency’s staff determined

the crack growth rate estimated by Niagara Mohawk was

appropriate, based on a review of metallurgical testing of two

vertical weld samples, as well as on measurements and

calculations performed by both the company and the NRC.

During its review of the request, the NRC conducted a

public meeting in Oswego, N.Y., on September 24, to obtain
2

comments on the request.

The company has agreed to provide the NRC with a

proposed inspection plan for the core shroud at least three

months before the next refueling outage. In addition, it has

agreed to maintain the chemistry of reactor coolant so as to

minimize the potential for cracking.

#
### §441k. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 441k was editorially reclassified as section 30126 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
##### 



DEARBORN BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q (continued) Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2005 (the Form 10-K) of Dearborn Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer). I, Jeffrey L. Karafa, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that:  (i)
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. Dated: May 10, 2005/s / Jeffrey L. KarafaJeffrey L. KarafaTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer,Dearborn Bancorp, Inc.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-81230-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

HOWARD COHAN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

BRAMAN PALM BEACH, INC.,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the Parties’Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with 

Prejudice [DE 10], (the “Stipulation”), filed herein on October 9, 2020. The Court has 

considered the Stipulation and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.

It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Stipulation is APPROVED;

2. This case is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice;

3. The Court retains jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the settlement 

agreement. 

4. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case and DENY AS MOOT any 

pending motions.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, 

this 13th day of October, 2020.

Case 9:20-cv-81230-WPD Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record

Case 9:20-cv-81230-WPD Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2020 Page 2 of 2
### §287a. Parliamentarian

The management, supervision, and administration of the Office shall be vested in the Parliamentarian, who shall be appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives without regard to political affiliation and solely on the basis of fitness to perform the duties of the position. Any person so appointed shall serve at the pleasure of the Speaker.

(Pub. L. 95–94, title I, §115, Aug. 5, 1977, 91 Stat. 668.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is based on section 2 of House Resolution No. 502, Ninety-fifth Congress, Apr. 20, 1977, which was enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 95–94.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,701,760
<SECURITIES>                                13,902,063
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,219,112
<ALLOWANCES>                                   226,444
<INVENTORY>                                  3,820,717
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,987,972
<PP&E>                                      17,676,137
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,912,360
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,727,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,523,002
<BONDS>                                      8,759,469
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       207,631
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,122,509
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,727,467
<SALES>                                      7,391,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,391,924
<CGS>                                        8,668,467
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,377,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (396,897)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               127,245
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             795,096
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (16,179,314)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (16,179,314)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (16,179,314)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.90)
        

</TABLE>
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# 05/08/01 - Ltr to: R.D. Quinn, BNFL, From E.W. Brach, SFPO, RE: Amendment No. 1 to CoC No. 1026 for the Fuel Solutions Spent Fuel Management System to Add Mixed Oxide, Partial, and Damaged Fuel Assemblies to the W74 Canister

Accession Number: ML011210377

Date Released: Thursday, August 9, 2007

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML011210396 - 05/08/01 - Ltr R.D. Quinn, BNFL, from E.W. Brach, SFPO, RE: Amendment No. 1 to CoC No. 1026 for the Fuel Solutions Spent Fuel Management System to Add Mixed Oxide, Partial, and to W74 Canister - ML011210396 (3 page(s), 5/8/2001)
    - ML011210069 - Final Certificate of Compliance, BNFL Fuel Solutions, Amendment No. 1 (5 page(s), 5/14/2001)
    - ML011210170 - Final Technical Specifications for the W74 Cansister for the Fuel Solutions CoC, Amendment No. 1. (59 page(s), 5/14/2001)
    - ML011210243 - Final Safety Evaluation Report supporting the Fuel Solutions CoC, Amendment No. 1. (22 page(s), 5/14/2001)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
No. 89-1286.

#### Frank *v.*Morando et al.

Ct. App. Cal, 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.