alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 191 (Monday, October 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59271-59272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-22160]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Tree Care Industry Association (``TCIA'')

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 8, 2004, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Tree Care Industry 
Association (``TCIA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
(1) the name and principal place of business of the standards 
development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards 
development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization is Tree Care Industry 
Association, Inc., Manchester, NH. The nature and scope of the TCIA's 
standards development activities are to serve as the secretariat and 
SDO for the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) A300 standards 
for tree, shrub, and other woody plant maintenance operations. The 
ANSI-accredited Standards Committee (ASC) A300 is the committee that 
writes the standards. TCIA currently has developed four performance 
standards addressing tree, shrub, and other woody plant maintenance 
operations: ANSI A300 Part 1-2001 Pruning; ANSI A300 Part-2004 
Fertilization; ANSI A300 Part 3-2000 Support Systems; and ANSI A300 
Part 4-2002 Lightning Protection Systems. TCIA also has three standards 
in development: BSR A300 Part 5-200x Management of Trees and Shrubs 
during Site Planning, Site Development, and Construction; BSR A300 Part 
6-200x

[[Page 59272]]

Transplanting; and PINS Part 7-200x Integrated Vegetation Management 
(IVM). TCIA is the SDO for the TCIA Standards for Accreditation. The 
TCIA Accreditation Council is the committee that writes the standards. 
The current Version is TCIA Accreditation Council Standards for 
Accreditation Draft 4 Version 2. TCIA was formerly the SDO for the NAA 
Standards for Pruning of Shade Trees; Guying of Shade Trees; 
Fertilizing Shade and Ornamental Trees; Lightning Protection 
Installation Systems for Trees; and Hydraulic Sprayer Calibration. The 
NAA Standard Practices committee was the committee that wrote the 
standards. The NAA standards were last updated in 1988 and no longer 
maintained by the TCIA. They are considered obsolete and have been 
superseded by ANSI 300 standards; however they are still used by some 
arborists, tree care companies, and governmental agencies.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-22160 Filed 10-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
EXHIBIT 10.67

**AMENDMENT NO. 1TOEMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

            This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment’) dated as of May 5, 2009, is made by and between Vanguard Health Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Mark R.Montoney, MD (the “Executive”).

            **WHEREAS**, the Company and the Executive executed a certain Employment Agreement  dated as of December 31, 2008 ( the “EA”),  to secure the services of the Executive asExecutive Vice President &  Chief Medical Officer; and

            **WHEREAS**, the Company and the Executive wish the Executive’s base salary set forth in Section 6(a) of the EA to be increased to $522,750, effective as of April 1, 2009.

            **NOW, THEREFORE**, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, the Company and the Executive hereby agree that the EA is amended as follows:

            1.         Defined Terms.  Except for those terms defined above, the definitions of capitalized terms used in this Amendment are as provided inthe EA.

            2.         Amendment to Section 6(a).  Section 6(a) of the EA entitled “Base Salary” is hereby  deleted and replaced with thefollowing new Section 6(a):

                        “(a)  *Base Salary.*  Effective April 1, 2009, the Executive’s base salary hereunder                        shall be $522,750 per year, payable semi-monthly. Commencing July 1, 2010, the                        Board shall review such base salary at least annually and make such adjustments from                        time to time as it may deem advisable, but the base salary shall not at any time be                        reduced from the base salary in effect from time to time.”

            3.         Ratification.  All other provisions of the EA remain unchanged and are hereby  ratified by the Company and the Executive.

1

----

            **IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by   its duly authorized officer and the Executive has executed this Amendment, each as of the day and yearfirst set forth above.

                                                                       **Vanguard Health Systems, Inc.**

                                                                       By:/s/ Ronald P. Soltman                                                                                                                    Ronald P. Soltman                                                                                   Executive Vice President

                                                                       **Executive**:

****

**                                                                       **/s/ Mark R. Montoney                                                                                                            Mark R. Montoney, MD

2
Editorial Note on Part 142
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 142.18 Entry summary not required for prohibited merchandise. ( a ) *Exportation or destruction of prohibited merchandise.* If merchandise released at time of entry is later found to be prohibited, an authorized CBP official shall demand its return to Customs custody in accordance with § 141.113 of this chapter, and an entry summary and the deposit of estimated duties, if any, shall not be required provided: ( 1 ) An entry for exportation filed using an in-bond application pursuant to part 18 of this chapter, or an application to destroy the merchandise under CBP supervision is made within 10 days after the time of entry, and the exportation or destruction is accomplished promptly, or
( 2 ) An entry for transportation and exportation, filed using an in-bond application pursuant to part 18 of this chapter, is made within 10 days after the time of entry and domestic carriage of the merchandise does not conflict with the requirements of another Federal agency.
( b ) *Procedures for exportation or destruction.* The exportation or destruction of prohibited merchandise as required by paragraph (a) shall be in accordance with §§ 158.41 and 158.45(c) of this chapter.
[T.D. 79-221, 44 FR 46821, Aug. 9, 1979, as amended by CBP Dec. 17-13, 82 FR 45406, Sept. 28, 2017]
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85, Atlanta, GA 30303

Tel. 404-562-4416 or 4417 Fax 404-562-4980

Internet: kmc2@nrc.gov or rdh1@nrc.gov

No: II-97-59 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark (404) 562-4416 (Friday, August 1, 1997)

Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417

NRC MOVES INSPECTION RESPONSIBILITY

FOR REGION II NON-POWER REACTORS TO HEADQUARTERS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has transferred inspection responsibility for

all non-power reactors located in its Region II area to NRC headquarters in Rockville,

Maryland, effective Monday, August 4. Non-power reactors are small reactors used for

purposes other than generating commercial electricity, such as research, teaching and

the production of medical isotopes.

Region II is based in Atlanta, Georgia and encompasses 10 southeastern states,

Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. NRC officials said the change is being made to

improve efficiency. All other regulatory activities for non-power reactors are overseen at

headquarters, and non-power reactor inspections constitute a small percentage of

Region II activities.

Inspections of non-power reactors are conducted at intervals of one to three

years and generally require one or two inspectors for one week.

Non-power reactors in Region II are licensed at the following locations:

Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA

North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC

University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA

In addition, the N.S. Savannah, a ship which at one time was powered by a

nuclear reactor, is mothballed in the James River in Virginia. The reactor has been

removed.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of NuTech Digital, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the twelve months ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, A. Frederick Greenberg, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the results of operations of the Company.





Dated: September 4, 2008



/s/ Richard M. Greenberg

---------------------

Richard M. Greenberg

President, Secretary and Treasurer

(Chief financial officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.













1
§ 12.150 Merchandise prohibited by economic sanctions; detention; seizure or other disposition; blocked property. ( a ) *Generally.* Merchandise from certain countries designated by the President as constituting a threat to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States shall be detained until the question of its release, seizure, or other disposition has been determined under law and regulations issued by the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) (31 CFR Chapter V).
( b ) *Seizure.* When an unlicensed importation of merchandise subject to OFAC's regulations is determined to be prohibited, no entry for any purpose shall be permitted and, unless the immediate reexportation or other disposition of such merchandise under Customs supervision has previously been authorized by OFAC, the merchandise shall be seized.
( c ) *Licenses.* OFAC's regulations may authorize OFAC to issue licenses on a case-by-case basis authorizing the importation of otherwise prohibited merchandise under certain conditions. If such a license is issued subsequent to the attempted entry and seizure of the merchandise, importation shall be conditioned upon the importer: ( 1 ) Agreeing in writing to hold the Government harmless, and
( 2 ) Paying any storage and other Customs fees, costs, or expenses, as well as any mitigated forfeiture amount or monetary penalty imposed or assessed by Customs or OFAC, or both.
( d ) *Blocked property.* Merchandise which constitutes property in which the government or any national of certain designated countries has an interest may be blocked (frozen) pursuant to OFAC's regulations and may not be transferred, sold, or otherwise disposed of without an OFAC license.
( e ) *Additional information.* For further information concerning importing merchandise prohibited under economic sanctions programs currently in effect, the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury should be contacted. The address of that office is 1500 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Annex 2nd Floor, Washington, DC 20220.
[T.D. 96-42, 61 FR 24889, May 17, 1996]
### §441c. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 441c was editorially reclassified as section 30119 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
**Exhibit
      10.19**




**Written
      Description of Compensatory Arrangement with Chief Operating
      Officer**





Carter
      Peters was appointed as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
      of
      Guaranty Federal Bancshares and Guaranty Bank (the “ Bank ”)
      effective August 8, 2005. The Bank has agreed to pay Mr. Peters an annual salary
      of $125,000, which will be reviewed annually, and may be increased based on
      such
      review, by the Bank. Mr. Peters may also receive a performance bonus in 2006
      based on the Bank achieving profit plan and earnings per share growth. There
      is
      no written employment agreement between the parties.
RATS ID NRC Chronology Date Due for | Incoming Outgoing Notes
Identification State Package Package
Adoption


RATS ID NRC Chronology
#### David Strauss, Appellant, v. Thomas R. Allen et al., Respondents.

Order affirmed with $20 costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Shientag, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant the motion.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes
      - Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of PLM Equipment Growth & Income Fund
      VII (the “Partnership”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, the President of the General Partner and of the
      Partnership, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)  the
      Report of the Partnership filed today fully complies with the requirements
      of
      Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.











/s/
      Paul M. Leand


Paul
      M.
      Leand


President
      of PLM Financial Services, Inc.


May
      11,
      2006
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-02-013 March 13, 2002

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: opa2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417 

 

NRC TO MEET WITH TVA OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS SAFETY

PERFORMANCE AT BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Tennessee Valley Authority

officials on Friday, March 22, to discuss the results of NRC's annual assessment of safety performance

at the Browns Ferry nuclear power plant.

The meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m. (CST) in the Days Inn conference room, 1322 Highway

72 East in Athens, Alabama. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be

available before the meeting is adjourned to answer any questions.

A letter sent from the NRCís Regional Administrator to TVA, which addresses plant safety

performance during the previous year and forms the basis of the meeting discussion, is available from

Region II Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/bf_2001q4.pdf

Current information for the two operating units at the Browns Ferry plant is available at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/BF2/bf2_chart.html

and www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/BF3/bf3_chart.html

###
#### Nathan I. Singer, Respondent, v. Bruner-Ritter, Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [180 Misc. 928.]
§ 165.25 Verifications of information. ( a ) Prior to making a determination under § 165.27, CBP may in its discretion verify information in the United States or foreign countries collected under § 165.23 as is necessary to make its determination.
( b ) CBP may conduct verifications before and after the deadline for the voluntary submission of new factual information as referenced in § 165.23. The general purpose of the verification is to verify the accuracy of the information already placed on the administrative record.
( c ) CBP will place a report about the verification, *i.e.,* the verification report, on the administrative record. CBP will require the party that underwent the verification to place verification exhibits on the administrative record. Verification exhibits will generally contain information compiled and verified by CBP at CBP's discretion during the verification. In accordance with § 165.4, both CBP and the party that underwent the verification will provide public versions of their verification documents, which will be served on all parties to the investigation. CBP will not accept voluntary submissions of new factual information at the verification after the deadline for voluntary submission of new factual information, as referenced in § 165.23. Parties to the investigation cannot submit rebuttal information to either CBP's verification report or the verification exhibits. Parties to the investigation may submit to CBP written arguments in relation to the verification report and/or its exhibits in accordance with § 165.26.
( d ) If CBP determines that information discovered during a verification is relevant to the investigation and constitutes new factual information, CBP will place it on the administrative record separately, in accordance with § 165.23, and allow parties to the investigation to submit rebuttal information.
[81 FR 56482, Aug. 22, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 19260, Mar. 18, 2024]
#### Charles M. Kohn v. Leopold Powell & Company.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations and
consolidated statements of cash flows found on pages 3, 4 and 5 of the
Company's Form 10-Q for the three months ended April 4, 1998, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1998
<CASH>                                           2,399
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  248,933
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,400
<INVENTORY>                                    384,398
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               648,193
<PP&E>                                         565,512
<DEPRECIATION>                                  67,724
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,428,741
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          232,053
<BONDS>                                        819,708
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           140
<OTHER-SE>                                     203,089
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,428,741
<SALES>                                        366,375
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               366,375
<CGS>                                          302,455
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  302,455
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,651
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   414
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,795
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,474
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,839
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,635
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,635
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
        

</TABLE>
### §61g–6. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 61g–6 was editorially reclassified as section 6155 of this title.
No: III-24-001 January 16, 2024

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng, 630-829-9662 

 Prema Chandrathil, 630-829-9663 

NRC to Hold Pre-Decisional Enforcement Conference with 

an Indianapolis-based Healthcare Company

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a pre-decisional enforcement conference Jan. 18 with 

representatives of Community Health Network, a multi-site healthcare services provider, to discuss proposed 

violations associated with radiological controls required during hospital operations at its facilities in 

Indianapolis, Indiana. 

The meeting will take place from 8 a.m.-12 p.m. Central time at the NRC’s Region III office at 

2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210, in Lisle, Illinois. It will be open to the public except for discussion on 

security-related information. The meeting notice has information on how the public can participate in the 

open portion by calling into a toll-free teleconference line or joining online.

The NRC identified three proposed violations of NRC requirements during a routine inspection. One 

involved the licensee’s failure to prepare a written directive before the administration of a medical isotope. 

The second involved the hospital’s apparent failure to monitor the occupational exposure from radiation 

sources to its workers and failure to require the use of individual monitoring devices. Details of the third 

proposed violation, which is security related, will not be made publicly available. 

During the enforcement conference, hospital representatives will have the opportunity to provide 

their perspective or additional information regarding the issues before the agency makes its final enforcement 

decision. The hospital representatives also can discuss corrective actions it has taken or planned to address 

the issues and prevent recurrence. 

No decisions will be made during the meeting. The NRC will review the information and make a 

final determination approximately 60 days after the conference. The decision will be publicly available.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Growth Properties, Inc. (the
"Company') on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John
Bucksbaum, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


               (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
          (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.







/s/ John Bucksbaum
------------------------------------------
John Bucksbaum
Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2002