alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93018, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 134.53 Examination packages. ( a ) *Site of marking* — ( 1 ) *Customs custody.* Articles (or containers) in examination packages may be marked by the importer at the place where they have been discharged from the importing or bonded carrier or in the public stores.
( 2 ) *Importer's premises or elsewhere.* If it is impracticable to mark the articles (or containers) in examination packages as provided in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the merchandise may be turned over to the importer after the amount of duty, estimated to be payable under 19 U.S.C. 1304(f) has been deposited to insure compliance with the marking requirements and the payment of any additional expense which will be incurred on account of Customs supervision. (See § 134.55.) The Center director may at his discretion accept the bond on Customs Form 301, containing the basic importation and entry bond conditions set forth in § 113.62 of this chapter as security for the requirements of 19 U.S.C. 1304 (f) and (g).
( b ) *Failure to export, destroy, or properly mark merchandise in examination packages.* If the articles (or containers) in examination packages are not exported, destroyed, or properly marked by the importer within a reasonable time (not more than 30 days), they shall be sent to general-order stores for disposition in accordance with part 127 of this chapter, unless covered by a warehouse entry. If covered by a warehouse entry, they shall be sent to the warehouse containing the rest of the shipment for marking prior to withdrawal.
[T.D. 72-262, 37 FR 20318, Sept. 29, 1972, as amended by T.D. 78-99, 43 FR 13061, Mar. 29, 1978; T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41183, Oct. 19, 1984; T.D. 90-51, 55 FR 28191, July 10, 1990]
§ 111.29 Diligence in correspondence and paying monies. ( a ) *Due diligence by broker.* Each broker must exercise due diligence in making financial settlements, in answering correspondence, and in preparing or assisting in the preparation and filing of records relating to any customs business matter handled by him as a broker. Payment of duty, tax, or other debt or obligation owing to the Government for which the broker is responsible, or for which the broker has received payment from a client, must be made to the Government on or before the date that payment is due. Payments received by a broker from a client after the due date must be transmitted to the Government within 5 working days from receipt by the broker. Each broker must provide a written statement to a client accounting for funds received for the client from the Government, or received from a client where no payment to the Government has been made, or received from a client in excess of the Governmental or other charges properly payable as part of the client's customs business, within 60 calendar days of receipt. No written statement is required if there is actual payment of the funds by a broker.
( b ) Notice to client of method of payment . ( 1 ) All brokers must provide their clients with the following written notification: If you are the importer of record, payment to the broker will not relieve you of liability for customs charges (duties, taxes, or other debts owed CBP) in the event the charges are not paid by the broker. Therefore, if you pay by check, customs charges may be paid with a separate check payable to the “U.S. Customs and Border Protection” which will be delivered to CBP by the broker.
( 2 ) The written notification set forth in paragraph (b)(1) of this section must be provided by brokers as follows: ( i ) On, or attached to, any power of attorney provided by the broker to a client for execution on or after September 27, 1982; and
( ii ) To each active client no later than February 28, 1983, and at least once at any time within each 12-month period after that date. An active client means a client from whom a broker has obtained a power of attorney and for whom the broker has transacted customs business on at least two occasions within the 12-month period preceding notification.
### §604. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 94–440, title V, §500, Oct. 1, 1976, 90 Stat. 1452, the Legislative Appropriation Act, 1977, which authorized the Congressional Budget Office to contract without regard to section 5 of former Title 41, Public Contracts, applied to fiscal year 1977 and was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation act:

Pub. L. 94–157, title I, Dec. 18, 1975, 89 Stat. 834.
#### § 11.2a Release from Customs custody without payment of tax on cigars, cigarettes and cigarette papers and tubes.

Cigars, cigarettes, and cigarette papers and tubes may be released from Customs custody without payment of any applicable internal revenue tax upon presentation of the Customs entry or withdrawal form and three copies of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Form 2145 (5200.11) or 3072 (5210.14), certified by the appropriate regional regulatory administrator, Bureau of Alcohol, and Tobacco and Firearms. The Customs officer shall complete the notice of release, retain one copy, send one copy to the regional regulatory administrator, and return one copy to the manufacturer. The release may not be made under a mail entry. See § 145.13(b) of this chapter.

[T.D. 78-329, 43 FR 43454, Sept. 26, 1978]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle, IL 60532

 Web Site:

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. III-01-036 July 5, 2001

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH EXELON GENERATION CO. TO DISCUSS

SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT THE BRAIDWOOD NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with Exelon Generation Co. officials July 12 to

discuss the NRCís annual assessment of safety performance at the Braidwood Nuclear Power Plant

near Braidwood, Illinois.

The meeting will begin at 1 p.m. CDT and will be held at the plantís Training Building in

Room 53, 35100 S. Route 53, near Braidwood. The public is invited to observe the session. NRC

officials will be available after the meeting to answer questions.

The annual assessment, referred to as the End-of-Cycle assessment, evaluates safety

performance at the Braidwood plant from April 2000 through March 2001, and informs plant officials

of the NRCís plans for future inspections at the facility.

The Braidwood assessment letter and inspection report are available at

http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr or from the Region III Public Affairs Office. Current performance

information for the plant is available at http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html.

# # #
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 Statement Pursuant to Section 906 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
By
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Dated: May 12, 2004 I, Martin M. McDermut, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of Superconductor Technologies Inc, herby certify that, to my
knowledge, that: 1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Superconductor
Technologies for the three month period ended April 3, 2004 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Superconductor Technologies Inc. /s/ Martin S. McDermut

Martin S. McDermutSenior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-02-0068 - Proposed Rule on Financial Information Requirements for Applications to Renew or Extend the Term of an Operating License for a Power Reactor

Accession Number: ML020700389

Date Released: Friday, May 10, 2002

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML020700307 - SECY-02-0068 - Proposed Rule on Financial Information Requirements for Applications to Renew or Extend the Term of an Operating License for a Power Reactor (6 page(s), 4/19/2002)
    - ML020700359 - SECY-02-0068-Attachment 1-FRN - Proposed Rule on Financial Information Requirements for Applications to Renew or Extend the Term of an Operating License for a Power Reactor (20 page(s), 4/19/2002)
    - ML020700372 - SECY-02-0068-Attachment 2- Regulatory Analysis - Proposed Rule - 10 CFR Part 50 - Financial Information for Applications to Renew or Extend the Term of an Operating License for a Power Reactor (25 page(s), 4/19/2002)
    - ML020700379 - SECY-02-0068-Attachment 3 - Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact - Proposed Rule for Financial Information for Applications to Renew or Extend the Term of an Operating License for a Power Reactor (10 CFR Part 50) (3 page(s), 4/19/2002)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Marjorie Thomas, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, as amended by this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of RealNetworks, Inc. and





2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: March 2, 2015








/s/ Marjorie Thomas


Marjorie Thomas


Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement on Form S-8 (No. 333-53552) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-83024) ofTripath Technology Inc. of our report dated January 30, 2003, except as to thefourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh paragraphs of Note 1, which are as ofApril 1, 2003, relating to the financial statements which appears in thisForm 10-K.

 

 
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|--------------------------------|
|                           |
| San Jose, California           |
| April 1, 2003                  |

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.1025 Transit and transshipment. ( a ) *General.* A good that has undergone production necessary to qualify as an originating good under § 10.1014 of this subpart will not be considered an originating good if, subsequent to that production, the good: ( 1 ) Undergoes further production or any other operation outside the territories of the Parties, other than unloading, reloading, or any other operation necessary to preserve the good in good condition or to transport the good to the territory of a Party; or
( 2 ) Does not remain under the control of customs authorities in the territory of a non-Party.
( b ) *Documentary evidence.* An importer making a claim that a good is originating may be required to demonstrate, to CBP's satisfaction, that the conditions and requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of this section were met. An importer may demonstrate compliance with this section by submitting documentary evidence. Such evidence may include, but is not limited to, bills of lading, airway bills, packing lists, commercial invoices, receiving and inventory records, and customs entry and exit documents.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.880 Imported directly. ( a ) *General.* To qualify as an originating good under the OFTA, a good must be imported directly from the territory of a Party into the territory of the other Party. For purposes of this subpart, the words “imported directly” mean: ( 1 ) Direct shipment from the territory of a Party into the territory of the other Party without passing through the territory of a non-Party; or
( 2 ) If the shipment passed through the territory of a non-Party, the good, upon arrival in the territory of a Party, will be considered to be “imported directly” only if the good did not undergo production, manufacturing, or any other operation outside the territories of the Parties, other than unloading, reloading, or any other operation necessary to preserve the good in good condition or to transport the good to the territory of a Party. Operations that may be performed outside the territories of the Parties include inspection, removal of dust that accumulates during shipment, ventilation, spreading out or drying, chilling, replacing salt, sulfur dioxide, or aqueous solutions, replacing damaged packing materials and containers, and removal of units of the good that are spoiled or damaged and present a danger to the remaining units of the good, or to transport the good to the territory of a Party.
( b ) *Documentary evidence.* An importer making a claim for preferential tariff treatment under the OFTA for an originating good may be required to demonstrate, to CBP's satisfaction, that the good was “imported directly” from the territory of a Party into the territory of the other Party, as that term is defined in paragraph (a) of this section. An importer may demonstrate compliance with this section by submitting documentary evidence. Such evidence may include, but is not limited to, bills of lading, airway bills, packing lists, commercial invoices, receiving and inventory records, and customs entry and exit documents.
### §5386. Special natural wines

#### (a) In general

Special natural wines are the products made, pursuant to a formula approved under this section, from a base of natural wine (including heavy-bodied blending wine) exclusively, with the addition, before, during or after fermentation, of natural herbs, spices, fruit juices, aromatics, essences, and other natural flavorings in such quantities or proportions as to enable such products to be distinguished from any natural wine not so treated, and with or without carbon dioxide naturally or artificially added, and with or without the addition, separately or in combination, of pure dry sugar or a solution of pure dry sugar and water, or caramel. No added wine spirits or alcohol or other spirits shall be used in any wine under this section except as may be contained in the natural wine (including heavy-bodied blending wine) used as a base or except as may be necessary in the production of approved essences or similar approved flavorings. The Brix degree of any solution of pure dry sugar and water used may be limited by regulations prescribed by the Secretary in accordance with good commercial practice.

#### (b) Cellar treatment

Special natural wines may be cellar treated under the provisions of section 5382(a) and (c).

(Added Pub. L. 85–859, title II, §201, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1386; amended Pub. L. 90–619, §5, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1237; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5386, act Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 671, consisted of provisions similar to those comprising this section, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 85–859.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–455 struck out "or his delegate" after "Secretary" wherever appearing.

1968—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 90–619 inserted reference to subsec. (a) of section 5382.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 90–619 effective on first day of first month which begins 90 days or more after Oct. 22, 1968, see section 6 of Pub. L. 90–619, set out as a note under section 5373 of this title.
### [§6429. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–295, div. A, title II, §221(a)(113), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 4054]

Section, added Pub. L. 108–27, title I, §101(b)(1), May 28, 2003, 117 Stat. 753, related to advance payment of portion of increased child credit for 2003.

A prior section 6429, added Pub. L. 96–499, title XI, §1131(a)(1), Dec. 5, 1980, 94 Stat. 2691; amended Pub. L. 97–34, title VI, §601(a)(1)–(5), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 335, 336; Pub. L. 97–448, title I, §106(a)(1), (3), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2387, 2388, related to credit and refund of chapter 45 windfall profit taxes on domestic crude oil paid by royalty owners, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 100–418, title I, §1941(b)(1), (c), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1323, 1324, applicable to crude oil removed from the premises on or after Aug. 23, 1988.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Dec. 19, 2014, subject to a savings provision, see section 221(b) of Pub. L. 113–295, set out as an Effective Date of 2014 Amendment note under section 1 of this title.
iUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-cv-23151-BLOOM/Louis

KAREEM PICKERING and

AARON MUHAMMED,

Plaintiffs,

v.

AKAL SECURITY, INC.,

Defendant.

___________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon non-party Nevada Smith’s request for leave to 

have Defendant’s Joint Settlement be made public, ECF No. [32] (“Motion”). On May 4, 2021, 

the parties in this case filed a Joint Notice of Settlement, ECF No. [30], of the claims in this case. 

Non-party Nevada Smith1now requests that the parties’ private settlement agreement be made 

public but cites to absolutely no authority that would justify such a request. Absent any binding 

legal authority that would support requiring the parties to file a private settlement agreement on 

the public docket, the Court sees no basis to grant this Motion.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion, ECF No. [32], is 

DENIED.

1 Nevada Smith previously requested leave to file an amicus brief to “provide this court [sic] with accurate 

facts that only Nevada Smith will provide” on the corporate identity of Defendant and of Defendant’s “TaxExempt Religious Cult” parent and subsidiary companies. ECF No. [15] at 2, 5. The Court denied Smith’s 

motion on October 14, 2020. ECF No. [16]. Smith then moved for reconsideration, ECF No. [17], which 

was also subsequently denied, ECF No. [18].

Case 1:20-cv-23151-BB Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2021 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 20-cv-23151-BLOOM/Louis

2

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on June 10, 2021.

 _________________________________

 BETH BLOOM

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: 

Counsel of record

Case 1:20-cv-23151-BB Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2021 Page 2 of 2
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5319 

To establish procedures for the removal of the Architect of the Capitol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 20, 2022 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. BLUNT) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To establish procedures for the removal of the Architect 

of the Capitol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF THE ARCHITECT OF THE CAP4 ITOL. 

5 Section 319 of the Legislative Branch Appropriations 

6 Act, 1990 (2 U.S.C. 1801) is amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub8 section (c); and 

9 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol10 lowing: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5319 IS

1 ‘‘(b) REMOVAL.—The Architect of the Capitol may 

2 be removed at any time by— 

3 ‘‘(1) impeachment; or 

4 ‘‘(2) joint resolution of Congress, only for— 

5 ‘‘(A) permanent disability; 

6 ‘‘(B) inefficiency; 

7 ‘‘(C) neglect of duty; 

8 ‘‘(D) malfeasance; or 

9 ‘‘(E) a felony or conduct involving moral 

10 turpitude.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 5A

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 208-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2022 Page 1 of 2
Resolution

First: The Nationalization, by means of forced expropriation, is decreed, and consequently 

the Cuban State, in complete authority, is awarded all the interest in assets and business entities 

located in the national territory and the rights and actions arising from the exploitation of the same, 

whatever the interest, title or mode of their ownership, of the following natural persons or judicial 

entities: 

. . . . 

96. Ramón Rodriguez e Hijos, S. en C. 

. . . . 

Second: The administration and management of the companies that by this Resolution are 

awarded to the Cuban State, are assigned to the organizations that are currently in charge of said 

companies, which may appoint for each of them the administrators they choose without prejudice to 

the powers of the Central Planning Board. 

Third: The organizations referred to in the previous Section are expressly authorized, by 

appropriate Resolutions, to extend the nationalization that this Resolution provides to as many assets, 

business entities, rights and stocks as are linked or related to those nationalized, whatsoever the form 

and title of the bond of affinity to the nationalized entities. 

Fourth: By reason of this Resolution. As detailed, they are declared to be matters of public 

necessity and of social and national interest, as well as the need for the expropriation. 

Fifth: In accordance with the provisions of Article 7 of Law 890 of 1960, the means and forms 

of payment which correspond to the individuals or legal entities affected by the expropriations 

provided in this Resolution will be regulated by Law. 

And in compliance with the expressed orders of Commander Raúl Castro Rus, Vice President 

of the Central Planning Board that it be published in the OFFICIAL GAZETTE of the Republic, this 

certification is issued in Havana as of July 5, 1961. 

Regino G. Boti 

Minister of the Economy 

Technical Secretary 

Central Planning Board 

S -5365 

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 208-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2022 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:20-cv-23178-WPD   Document 13   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2020   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:20-cv-23178-WPD   Document 13   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2020   Page 2 of 2
#### The Link Realty and Construction Company, Respondent, v. Public *955Construction Company, Appellant, and Others, Defendants.

Reargument ordered and case set down for Friday, May 7,1915. Present—Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Rich and Putnam, JJ.