alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-142 September 21, 2000

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET ON STEAM GENERATOR TUBE ISSUES OCTOBER 10-13

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS)

has scheduled a meeting of its ad hoc subcommittee in Rockville, Maryland, on October 10-13, to

discuss a differing professional opinion on nuclear power plant steam generator tube issues.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two

White Flint North building, at 11545 Rockville Pike, beginning at 1 p.m. on October 10 and 8:30 a.m.

on the remaining three days.

On October 10, the ad hoc subcommittee will discuss its approach for reviewing the technical

merits of Differing Professional Opinion (DPO) issues associated with steam generator tube integrity,

and developing comments and recommendations for consideration by the full Committee.

The following day the subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with the

author of the steam generator DPO and other interested persons about DPO issues, views on the

adequacy of the NRC staff’s approach for resolving these issues, and other areas of concern.

On October 12, the subcommittee will conduct a session regarding the status of resolution of

DPO issues and related matters. The last day of the session will include discussion on these issues

with the staff and the DPO author, as needed, and the development of proposed comments and

recommendations for consideration by the full Committee.

Those who wish to make oral or written statements, or seek additional information on the

meeting or changes to the agenda, should contact either Sam Duraiswamy, at 301-415-7364, or Undine

Shoop, at 301-415-8086.

ACRS meeting notices, transcripts and letters are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW/ .

###
§ 145.14 Marking requirements. ( a ) *Country of origin.* Merchandise imported by mail shall be marked with the country of origin in accordance with part 134 of this chapter. If merchandise without the required marking is to be delivered from the post office where it has been given Customs examination, the Customs officer shall require compliance with the marking law and regulations. If it is to be delivered from another post office, the Customs officer shall place in the envelope containing the mail entry a copy of Customs Form 3475, containing instructions to the postmaster concerning the marking to be required before delivery.
( b ) *Other marking requirements.* Certain types of merchandise are subject to special marking requirements, such as those contained in the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act, the Wool Products Labeling Act, and the Trademark Act. Since there is no provision for post office supervision of these types of marking, the CBP shall require compliance with the law and regulations (see parts 11 and 133 of this chapter).
( c ) *Failure to mark.* If the addressee fails to comply with the marking requirements, the mail article will be treated as undeliverable in accordance with § 145.5.
[T.D. 73-135, 38 FR 13369, May 21, 1973, as amended by T.D. 78-102, 43 FR 14454, Apr. 6, 1978; CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93020, Dec. 20, 2016]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-087 July 16, 2001

NRC ANNOUNCES AVAILABILITY OF LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATIONS

FOR CATAWBA, MCGUIRE 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is announcing the availability for public inspection of

applications for 20-year renewals of the operating licenses for the Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and

2, and the McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2. Duke Energy Corporation, operator of the four

units, submitted the applications on June 13. 

The Catawba nuclear facility is located 18 miles southwest of Charlotte, N.C., in York County,

S.C. The current operating licenses expire on December 6, 2024, for Unit 1 and February 24, 2026, for

Unit 2. 

The McGuire nuclear facility is located 17 miles north-northwest of Charlotte, in Mecklenburg

County. The operating license for Unit 1 expires on June 12, 2021, and the license for Unit 2 on March

3, 2023. 

Copies of the applications are being made available electronically to allow time for the public to

become familiar with them. They are located on the NRC web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/REACTOR/LR/index.html , and are also available through the NRCís

Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). Help in using ADAMS is

available by contacting the NRC Public Document Room staff at 301/415-4737 or 1/800/397-4209, or

by sending a message to pdr@nrc.gov via e-mail.

In addition, copies of the license renewal applications for the Catawba and McGuire plants are

available at the Rock Hill Public Library, Rock Hill, S.C., and at the J. Murrey Atkins Library in

Charlotte, N.C. 

The NRC staff is currently conducting an initial review of the applications to determine whether

they contain enough information for the required formal review. If the applications have sufficient

information, the NRC will formally ìdocket,î or file, the applications and will announce an opportunity

to request a hearing.

###
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-97-88 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Monday, December 15, 1997)

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $55,000 FINE AGAINST ROBINSON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $55,000 civil penalty against

Carolina Power & Light Company for violations of NRC requirements relating to emergency

diesel generators at the Robinson nuclear power plant near Hartsville, South Carolina.

In August 1997, the NRC resident inspector discovered that the output breaker control switch

for one of the emergency diesel generators was in the wrong position. The mispositioned

switch caused that diesel generator to be inoperable for an undetermined period, but probably

for at least four days. The emergency diesel generators provide emergency power to safety

equipment if the plant loses offsite power. There were no actual safety consequences, but the

potential safety consequences were high because the generator, if needed, would have been

incapable of providing power.

In a letter to CP&L, NRC Regional Administrator Luis Reyes said that “the regulatory

significance is also high” because of a similar event in November 1993 and “a failure to take

adequate corrective action to preclude repetition.” Reyes’ letter also said “the importance of

these controls should have been recognized given the absence of automatic alarms to alert

operators to situations which could remain undetected until the EDG [emergency diesel

generator] was called on to mitigate an accident.”

The first violation cited involved the failure to identify promptly and correct the mispositioned

switch. The second violation was the failure to take adequate corrective action to preclude

repetition of position control errors.

The NRC staff has proposed a $55,000 civil penalty for the two violations together.

The company has 30 days from receipt of the Notice of Violation to either pay the fine or

protest its imposition.

#
[Exhibit 31.1]

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Med Gen, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Paul B.
Kravitz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
             13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
             all material respects, the financial condition and result of
             operations of the Company.





                                        /s/ Paul B. Kravitz
                                        ---------------------------
                                        Paul B. Kravitz,
                                        Principal Executive Officer


May 23, 2005



<PAGE>
•'ff/1 . 

## INDIMUIOIPARTMEN T O F TfUINSPORTATIO N Drivin g Indiana' s Economi c Growt h 10 0 Nort h Senat e Avenu e Roo m N75 8 Indianapolis , Indian a 4620 4 PHONE : (317 ) 232-553 3 FAX : (317 ) 232-023 8 Mitchel l E . Daniels , Jr. , Governo r Michae l B . Cllne , Commissione r; . Augus t 24,201 0 Th e Honorabl e Raymon dH . LaHoo d Secretary o f

Transportatio n U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 40 0 Seventh Street , S W Washington , D C 2059 0 Dea r Secretar y LaHood , Pleas e accep t

thi s lette r fromth e Indian aDepartmen t o f Transportatio n a s suppor t for agran t proposa l b y th e Evansvill e Regional Airport . Thi s proposa l ha s bee n submitte dt o th e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n for

th e establishmen t

o f ane w schedule dcommercial ai r servic e betwee n Evansville , Indian aan dBaltimor e / Washington , D.C , Th e proposa l ha s bee n submitte dunde r th e Smal l Community Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Program an dwoul dserv e a s are-establishmen t o f commercia l interstat e airlin e servic e t o thi s vital part o f Indiana . Thi s re-establishmen t o f schedule dinterstat e airlin e servic e wil l no t onl y assis t

i n th e economi c developmen t

o f thi s community , bu t

wil l b e o f

great benefi t t o th e stat e o f

Indian aa s a whole . A s Commissioner

o f th e Indian aDepartmen t

o f Transportation , I respectfull y reques t your support o f thi s worthwhil e ventur e an dapprova l o f th e Evansvill e Regional Airport proposal . 

## e

n c7 3

Sincerely , Michae l B . Clin e Commissione r Indian aDepartmen t

o f Transportatio n Cc : Rober

t F . Tally , Indian aDivisio n Administrator , Federa l Higliway Administratio n

www.in.gov/dot

/ A n Equa l Opportunit y Employe r

Evansvill e Regiona l Airpor t - Smal l Communit y Ai rServic e Developmen t Gran t - Augus t 201 0 

# 3 0
**Archive**Reaching Public Goals:
#### § 123.23 Train sheet for in-transit rail shipments.

Before an in-transit train proceeding under the provisions of this subpart departs from the United States, the carrier shall furnish to the customs officer at the port of exit a train sheet, sometimes called a consist, bridge sheet or trip sheet, listing each car of the train and specifically identifying the in-transit cars, unless a consolidated manifest containing this information has been presented for a train which will remain intact.
#### § 142.36 Can I obtain judicial review?

If the initial decision is appealed, the decision of the Administrator is the final decision of SBA and is not subject to judicial review unless the defendant files a petition for judicial review within 60 days after the Administrator serves the defendant with a copy of the final decision.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-51 (FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE)

(Tuesday, March 16, 1999)

COMMISSION PUBLISHES ‘WHITE PAPER’ REPORT

ON RISK-INFORMED, PERFORMANCE-BASED REGULATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a “white paper” special report

outlining its expectations regarding the “risk-informed” and “performance-based”

regulation of nuclear safety.

The report defines these and other related terms in an effort to promote a more

common understanding within the NRC and its regulated community, as well as by the

public, as to how risk-informed and performance-based concepts apply to various

agency functions.

The NRC has been moving for some time to a more risk-informed regulatory

framework, in which the regulator uses the insights from probabilistic risk assessments

(PRAs) and other risk assessment methods to place the greatest emphasis on those

areas of greatest risk to the public.

A Commission policy statement adopted in August 1995 formalized the agency’s

commitment to achieving that goal through the expanded use of PRAs and other

techniques that quantify and rank risk. This risk-informed focus is supplemented by

performance-based regulatory oversight, which emphasizes measurable results over

process and method, and thus, in some areas, can allow for greater regulatory

flexibility in application.

The text of the white paper, “Risk-Informed and Performance-Based Regulation”

is posted on the NRC Internet web page at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/COMMISSION/POLICY/whiteppr.html.

###
#### § 145.31 Importations not over $800 in value.

The port director will pass free of duty and tax, without preparing an entry as provided for in § 145.12, packages containing merchandise having an aggregate fair retail value in the country of shipment of not over $800, subject to the requirements set forth in §§ 10.151 and 10.153 of this chapter.

[T.D. 94-51, 59 FR 30296, June 13, 1994, as amended by CBP Dec. 12-19, 77 FR 72721, Dec. 6, 2012; CBP Dec. No. 16-13, 81 FR 58834, Aug. 26, 2016]
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 7 -00 077 -CV In re Wate rfall Gallery of Austin, L .P . ORI GINAL PRO CEEDING FRO M TRAVIS CO UNTY ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N The pe tition for writ of mandamus is denied. G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pember ton and Waldrop Filed: May

9, 2007
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6830

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BARKLEY GARDNER, a/k/a Big Black,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, 

Senior District Judge. (4:95-cr-00041-H-8; 4:03-cv-00060-H)

Submitted: July 25, 2013 Decided: July 30, 2013

Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barkley Gardner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Barkley Gardner seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his motion to reconsider the order denying his 

motion to amend his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2013) motion. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Gardner has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §60a–1b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 60a–1b was editorially reclassified as section 4573 of this title.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-00-29 June 29, 2000

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH PUBLIC TO DISCUSS

NEW REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS FOR WNP-2

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting Thursday, July 6, in

Richland, Wash., to discuss the new reactor oversight process for WNP-2, a nuclear power plant

operated by Energy Northwest.

The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. at the Richland Public Library, 955 Northgate Dr. Anyone

who would like to learn more about the new oversight process or ask questions of NRC officials is

invited to attend.

The new program was implemented nationwide in early April after a six-month pilot test

conducted at 13 nuclear power plants at nine sites from May to November 1999. It uses more

objective, timely, and safety-significant criteria in assessing performance, while seeking to more

effectively and efficiently regulate the industry. It also takes into account improvements in the

performance of the nuclear industry over the past twenty years.

Under the new process, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional office-based

personnel are supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance indicators.

These performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant performance, including the

viability of redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection, and security.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC’s internet website every three months, along with semi-annual updates to each plant's inspection

plans. Current performance information for WNP-2 can be found at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/WASH2/wash2_chart.html

A plain language summary of the new inspection and assessment program is available from the

NRC Office of Public Affairs or on the website at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm.

###
#### § 130.300 Small Business Development Centers (SBDCs).

The Small Business Development Center Program is established under the statutory authority of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648) and administered through cooperative agreements issued to recipient organizations.

[88 FR 76642, Nov. 7, 2023]
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### §§ 10.181-10.182 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 3

Case 0:20-cv-61413-AHS Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 1 of 4
1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SEVENTEENTH 

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD

COUNTY, FLORIDA

Lee Benhayon, Individually and on 

behalf of all Others similarly situated,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

RSL Funding, LLC,

 Defendant.

______________________________/

No. 20-20-008375

RSL FUNDING, LLC’S NOTICE OF REMOVAL

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on July 13, 2020, Defendant RSL Funding, LLC (“RSL”), 

filed in the United States District Court in and for the Southern District of Florida, Fort 

Lauderdale Division, its Notice of Removal of the above-entitled action from the 17th Judicial 

Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida to the United States District Court in and for the 

Southern District of Florida, Fort Lauderdale Division, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332, 

1441, 1446, and 1453. A true and correct copy of said Notice of Removal is attached to this 

Notice of Filing as Exhibit “A” and is served and filed herewith. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that filing of this Notice with the Clerk of the 

Circuit Court for Broward County, Florida, serves to effect full removal of this case pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 1446(d), thereby precluding this Circuit Court from proceeding further in this action, 

unless and until this case is remanded hereto by the United States District Court.

Case 0:20-cv-61413-AHS Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 2 of 4
2

Dated: July 13, 2020 Respectfully Submitted, 

STUMPHAUZER FOSLID SLOMAN

ROSS & KOLAYA, PLLC

Two South Biscayne Boulevard,

Suite 1600

Miami, FL 33131

Telephone: (305) 614-1400

Facsimile: (305) 614-1425

By: /s/ Ian M. Ross

IAN M. ROSS

Florida Bar No. 091214

iross@sfslaw.com

docketing@sfslaw.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

RSL FUNDING, LLC

Case 0:20-cv-61413-AHS Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 3 of 4
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 13th day of July, 2020, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the Florida Courts E-Filing 

Portal. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served on Plaintiff’s counsel by e-mail 

generated by the E-Portal system.

/s/ Ian M. Ross

IAN M. ROSS

SERVICE LIST

HIRALDO P.A.

Manuel S. Hiraldo, Esq.

mhiraldo@hiraldolaw.com

401 E. Las Olas Boulevard

Suite 1400

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

(954) 400-4713

EISENBAND LAW, P.A.

515 E. Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 120

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301

Michael Eisenband

Florida Bar No. 94235

Email: MEisenband@Eisenbandlaw.com

Telephone: 954.533.4092

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 0:20-cv-61413-AHS Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2020 Page 4 of 4
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.1


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                     TO THE

                       CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                                       OF

                      LEVIATHAN GAS PIPELINE PARTNERS, L.P.



         The undersigned, desiring to amend the Certificate of Limited
Partnership of LEVIATHAN GAS PIPELINE PARTNERS, L.P., pursuant to the provisions
of Section 17-202 of the Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act of the State of
Delaware, does hereby certify as follows:

         FIRST: The name of the Limited Partnership is:

                      Leviathan Gas Pipeline Partners, L.P.

         SECOND: Article I of the Certificate of Limited Partnership shall be
amended as follows:

                                   "ARTICLE I

                                      NAME

                  The name of the limited partnership shall be El Paso Energy
         Partners, L.P."

         THIRD: This amendment to the Certificate of Limited Partnership shall
be effective as of December 1, 1999.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned executed this Amendment to the
Certificate of Limited Partnership on this 29th day of November 1999.


                                       LEVIATHAN GAS PIPELINE COMPANY
                                         the General Partner



                                       By:       /s/ C. DANA RICE
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                     C. Dana Rice
                                               Vice President and Treasurer