alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 20, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23476]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket 34-2004]


Proposed Foreign-Trade Zone--Conroe (Montgomery County), Texas 
Extension of Comment Period

    The comment period for the application to establish a general-
purpose foreign-trade zone in Conroe (Montgomery County), Texas, 
submitted by the City of Conroe, Texas (69 FR 51060, 8/17/04), is being 
extended to November 19, 2004 to allow interested parties additional 
time in which to comment. Rebuttal comments may be submitted until 
December 6, 2004. Submissions (original and 3 copies) shall be 
addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary at one of the following 
addresses:
    1. Submissions via Express/Package Delivery Services: Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce, Franklin Court Building-Suite 
4100W, 1099 14th St., NW., Washington, DC 20005; or
    2. Submissions via U.S. Postal Service: Foreign-Trade Zones Board, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, FCB-Suite 4100W, 1401 Constitution Ave., 
NW., Washington, DC 20230.

    Dated: October 13, 2004.
Dennis Puccinelli,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-23476 Filed 10-19-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### Julia Collins, Respondent, v. Anna Leino et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
§ 122.46 Crew purchase list. ( a ) *When required.* A crew purchase list shall be filed with the general declaration for any aircraft required to enter under § 122.41.
( b ) *Exception.* A crew purchase list is not required for aircraft arriving directly from Canada on a flight beginning in Canada and ending in the U.S. If a written crew declaration is required for the aircraft under subpart G of part 148 of this chapter (Crewmember Declarations and Exemptions), it shall be attached to the air cargo manifest, along with the number of any written crew declarations.
( c ) *Form.* If a crewmember enters articles for which a written crew declaration is not required (see subpart G, part 148 of this chapter), the articles shall be listed next to the crewmember's name on the general declaration, or on the attached crew purchase list. Articles listed on a written crew declaration need not be listed on the crew purchase list if: ( 1 ) The crew declaration is attached to the general declaration, or to the crew list which in turn is attached to the general declaration; and
( 2 ) The statement “Crew purchases as per attached crew declaration” appears on the general declaration or crew list.
#### In the Matter of the Application for Letters of Administration on the Estate of Charles W. Scofield, Deceased. Seth W. Scofield, Appellant; Jean Winifred Fitzsimmons Claiming to Be Jean Winifred Scofield, Respondent.

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00674-CV

Joseph Thompson and Thompson Custom Properties, LLC, Appellants

v.

Greg L. Gibson; DSRE Funding LLC; High Equity Investments, LLC; DSRE Holdings, 

LLC; DSRE Homes LLC; DSRE Centex Partners, LLC; GLG Investments LLC; Direct 

Effect LLC; Direct Effect Real Estate Services LLC; Clay Carter; and Marcia Trejo, 

Appellees

FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY

NO. 968-21, THE HONORABLE CARSON TALMADGE CAMPBELL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On October 25, 2022, appellants Joseph Thompson and Thompson Custom 

Properties, LLC filed their notice of appeal from the trial court’s final judgment, granting 

appellees’ no-evidence motion for summary judgment and dismissing appellants’ claims. On 

December 28, 2022, appellants filed a notice in this Court, stating that the trial court has granted 

their motion for new trial and that their appeal should be dismissed.

The jurisdiction of the Court is limited to the review of final judgments and from

certain interlocutory appeals made immediately appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har-Con 

Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 51.012, .014. When 

a trial court grants a motion for new trial, the court’s original judgment or order is set aside, 

and the parties proceed without prejudice from the prior proceedings. Markowitz v. Markowitz, 
2

118 S.W.3d 82, 88 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. denied). “[T]he court 

essentially wipes the slate clean and starts over.” Wilkins v. Methodist Healthcare Sys., 

160 S.W.3d 559, 563 (Tex. 2005); see Tex. R. App. P. 21.9(b) (“Granting a new trial restores the 

case to its position before the former trial . . . .”).

Although appellants have not filed a formal motion to dismiss, we take notice of 

the trial court’s order granting their motion for new trial. See Fannie Mae v. Haddox, No. 03-15-

00006-CV, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 4712, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin May 8, 2015, no pet.) (mem. 

op.) (taking notice of trial court’s order granting motion for new trial and dismissing appeal for 

want of jurisdiction). Because there is no longer a final judgment over which we may exercise 

appellate jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3 (a).

__________________________________________

Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Justices Baker, Kelly, and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: January 31, 2023
Editorial Note on Part 159
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93023, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 159.6 Difference between liquidated duties and estimated duties. ( a ) *Difference under $20 in original liquidation.* When there is a net difference of less than $20 between the total amount of duties, fees, taxes, and interest assessed in the liquidation of any entry (other than an informal, mail, or baggage entry) and the total amount of estimated duties, fees, and taxes deposited, including any supplemental deposit, the difference will be disregarded and the entry endorsed “as entered.” In the case of an informal, mail, or baggage entry, the amount of duties, fees, and taxes computed by a CBP officer when the entry is prepared by, or filed with, him will be considered the liquidated assessment.
( b ) *Difference under $20 in reliquidation.* When there is a net difference of less than $20 between the total amount of duties, fees, taxes, and interest found due in the reliquidation of any entry and the total amount of duties, fees, taxes, and interest assessed in the prior liquidation of the entry, the difference will be disregarded except in the following cases: ( 1 ) *Reliquidation at importer's request.* When reliquidation of any entry is made at the importer's request, such as reliquidation following the allowance of a protest under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1514), or, for entries made before December 18, 2004, a request for correction under section 520(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1520(c)), any refund determined to be due will be refunded even if less than $20.
( 2 ) *Court decision.* Any refund or increase determined to be due as the result of the reliquidation of an entry in accordance with a court decision and judgment order will be refunded or collected as the case may be.
( c ) *Difference of $20 or more collected or refunded.* If there is a difference of $20 or more between the duties, fees, taxes, and interest assessed in the liquidation of an entry and the total estimated duties, fees, and taxes deposited, or between the total duties, fees, taxes, and interest assessed in the reliquidation of an entry and those assessed in the prior liquidation, the entry will be endorsed to show the difference and bills or refund checks will be issued.
( d ) *Customs duties and fees and internal revenue taxes and interest netted for $20 limit.* The assessments of customs duties and fees and internal revenue taxes and interest will be separately stated on the entry at the time of liquidation, but the amounts of any differences will be netted when applying the $20 minimum for issuance of a bill or refund check.
[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17482, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 78-394, 43 FR 49791, Oct. 25, 1978; T.D. 94-51, 59 FR 30296, June 13, 1994; 64 FR 56440, Oct. 20, 1999; CBP Dec. 11-02, 76 FR 2576, Jan. 14, 2011]
§ 191.11 Tradeoff. ( a ) *Exchanged merchandise.* To comply with §§ 191.21 and 191.22 of this part, the use of domestic merchandise taken in exchange for imported merchandise of the same kind and quality (as defined in § 191.2(x)(1) of this part for purposes of 19 U.S.C. 1313(b)) shall be treated as use of the imported merchandise if no certificate of delivery is issued covering the transfer of the imported merchandise. This provision shall be known as tradeoff and is authorized by § 313(k) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(k)).
( b ) *Requirements.* Tradeoff must occur between two separate legal entities but it is not necessary that the entity exchanging the imported merchandise be the importer thereof. In addition, tradeoff must consist of an exchange of same kind and quality merchandise and nothing else (the exchange may be of different quantities of same kind and quality merchandise, but may not involve the payment or receipt of cash payments or other than same kind and quality merchandise). If the quantities of merchandise exchanged are different, the lesser quantity shall be the quantity available for drawback. If the quantity of domestic merchandise received is greater than the quantity of imported merchandise exchanged, the merchandise identified for drawback shall be the portion of the domestic merchandise equal to the quantity of imported merchandise which is first received.
( c ) *Application.* Each would-be user of tradeoff, except those operating under an approved specific manufacturing drawback ruling covering substitution, must apply to the Entry Process and Duty Refunds Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade, CBP Headquarters, for a determination of whether the imported and domestic merchandise are of the same kind and quality. For those users manufacturing under substitution drawback, this request should be contained in the application for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling (§ 191.8). For those users manufacturing under a general manufacturing drawback ruling (§ 191.7), the request should be made by a separate letter.
[T.D. 98-16, 63 FR 11006, Mar. 5, 1998; 63 FR 15288, Mar. 31, 1998]
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23565]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[USCG-2004-19205]

Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board Membership

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of appointments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is providing notice of the appointment of 11 
individuals to serve on its Performance Review Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronald Kogut, Chief, Office of 
Civilian Personnel, (202) 267-0921.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the Coast Guard 
is required to publish the names of individuals appointed to serve on 
the Coast Guard Performance Review Board (CGPRB). The following 11 
persons have been selected to serve on the CGPRB:
    Rear Admiral K.T. Venuto, Assistant Commandant for Human Resources, 
United States Coast Guard;
    Rear Admiral D.G. Gabel, Assistant Commandant for Acquisition, 
United States Coast Guard;
    Rear Admiral L.L. Hereth, Director of Port Security, United States 
Coast Guard;
    Rear Admiral R.D. Sirois, Assistant Commandant for Operations, 
United States Coast Guard;
    Rear Admiral J.C. Van Sice, Director of Reserve and Training, 
United States Coast Guard;
    Rear Admiral D.W. Kunkel, Director of Operations Capability, United 
States Coast Guard;
    Rear Admiral J.W. Underwood, Director of Operations Policy, United 
States Coast Guard;
    Rear Admiral E.M. Brown, Assistant Commandant for Systems, United 
States Coast Guard;
    Mr. John Matticks, Senior Planning Advisor, Federal Emergency 
Management Agency;
    Ms. Sheila Lumsden, Deputy Assistant Director for Human Resources 
and Training, U.S. Secret Service; and
    Mr. Sam Russ, Executive Director for Tactical Communications, U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection.

    Dated: October 15, 2004.
Ronald Kogut,
Chief, Office of Civilian Personnel.
[FR Doc. 04-23565 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
```
### §2142. Superintendent of Botanic Garden and greenhouses

There shall be a superintendent and assistants in the Botanical Garden and greenhouses, who shall be under the direction of the Joint Committee on the Library.

(R.S. §1827.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 216 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

R.S. §1827 derived from act Mar. 3, 1873, ch. 226, §1, 17 Stat. 491.
CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GlobalIndustries, Ltd. ("Global") on Form10-Q for the quarter ending September 30,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on November21, 2005 (the "Report"), theundersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 1350 asadopted pursuant to §§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge basedupon a review of the Report, that:

(1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2)              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global as of thedates and for periods presented as required by such Report.

| /S/ TIMOTHY W. MICIOTTO |
|-------------------------|
| Timothy W. Miciotto     |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| November 21,  2005      |

This certification is provided pursuant to §§ 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Global or the certifying officerfor purposes of §§ 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by§§ 906 has been provided to Global and will be retained by it and furnished tothe SEC or its staff upon request.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-113 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, July 8, 1998)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

A meeting of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on

Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) subcommittee scheduled for July 17 in Rockville,

Maryland, has been postponed due to the unavailability of key personnel.

The meeting of the Subcommittee on Reliability and Probabilistic Risk

Assessment will be rescheduled at a date to be announced in a future Federal Register

notice.

#
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                                     Exhibit 12
                                                                                                                     ----------

                                        PRIME MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                      COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                    FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 AND 2001
                                                         (Unaudited)



                                                                                             Nine Months Ended September 30,
($ in thousands)                                                                                 2002                 2001
                                                                                             -------------        -------------

<S>                                                                                            <C>                   <C>
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes and after minority interests                   $ (4,801)             $10,371

Undistributed equity income                                                                           -                 (198)

Minority interest income of subsidiaries with fixed charges                                       6,528                9,828
                                                                                               ---------             --------

     Adjusted earnings                                                                            1,727               20,001
                                                                                               ---------             --------

Interest on debt                                                                                  7,563                8,504

Loan fees                                                                                         1,069                  163
                                                                                               ---------             --------

     Total fixed charges                                                                          8,632                8,667
                                                                                               ---------             --------

Total available earnings before fixed charges                                                  $ 10,359              $28,668
                                                                                               =========             ========

Ratio                                                                                               1.2                  3.3
                                                                                               =========             ========


</TABLE>
### §288c. Defending the Senate, committee, subcommittee, member, officer, or employee of Senate

(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (b), when directed to do so pursuant to section 288b(a) of this title, the Counsel shall—

(1) defend the Senate, a committee, subcommittee, Member, officer, or employee of the Senate in any civil action pending in any court of the United States or of a State or political subdivision thereof, in which the Senate, such committee, subcommittee, Member, officer, or employee is made a party defendant and in which there is placed in issue the validity of any proceeding of, or action, including issuance of any subpena or order, taken by the Senate, or such committee, subcommittee, Member, officer, or employee in its or his official or representative capacity; or

(2) defend the Senate or a committee, subcommittee, Member, officer, or employee of the Senate in any proceeding with respect to any subpena or order directed to the Senate or such committee, subcommittee, Member, officer, or employee in its or his official or representative capacity.

(b) Representation of a Member, officer, or employee under subsection (a) shall be undertaken by the Counsel only upon the consent of such Member, officer, or employee.

(Pub. L. 95–521, title VII, §704, Oct. 26, 1978, 92 Stat. 1877.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 3, 1979, see section 717 of Pub. L. 95–521, set out as a note under section 288 of this title.
APPENDIX C

AREA SOURCES

Bureau of Air Quality

Department of Environmental Protection
This page blank for copying purposes.
Exhibit 2

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 17-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2020 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 17-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2020 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 17-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2020 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 17-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2020 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 17-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2020 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 17-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2020 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 17-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2020 Page 7 of 7
§ 148.111 Written declaration for unaccompanied articles. The baggage declaration, Customs Form 6059-B, of a person (the crewmembers declaration, Customs Form 5129, in the case of a returning crewmember) arriving directly or indirectly from American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or the Virgin Islands of the United States shall be in writing if it covers articles which do not accompany him and: ( a ) The articles are entitled to free entry under the $1,200 exemption provided by subheading 9804.00.70, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) (19 U.S.C. 1202), or
( b ) The articles are noncommerical importations of limited value subject to a flat rate of duty under subheading 9816.00.40, HTSUS.
[T.D. 78-394, 43 FR 49790, Oct. 25, 1978, as amended by T.D. 86-118, 51 FR 22516, June 20, 1986; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51267, Dec. 21, 1988; T.D. 97-75, 62 FR 46443, Sept. 3, 1997]