alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-055 August 29, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC DETERMINES INSPECTION FINDING FOR OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT

TO BE OF LOW TO MODERATE SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has determined that an inspection finding for the

Oyster Creek nuclear power plant pertaining to security should be characterized as ìwhite,î meaning it

is an issue of low to moderate safety significance but one which may require additional NRC

inspections. The plant, located in Lacey Township, N.J., is operated by AmerGen Energy Company.

 The inspection finding is based on NRC assessment of a security exercise conducted at the plant

in May. An NRC team observed and evaluated four force-on-force drills at that time and determined

that during one of those exercises, the response strategy was insufficient to successfully thwart an

adversary force.

 During a regulatory conference with NRC staff to discuss the finding in August, plant managers

contended the problem was the result of artificialities introduced during the drill. However, NRC staff,

after careful consideration, found that artificialities were not a sufficient basis for a change in the

assessment because, among other reasons, they are largely within the companyís control.

 Under the agencyís significance determination process, NRC officials classify certain conditions

at nuclear power plants as being one of four colors which delineate increasing levels of severity,

beginning with ìgreenî and progressing in severity to ìwhite,î ìyellowî or ìred.î Any finding of

white or above could result in additional inspections.

 ###
§ 190.63 Liability for drawback claims. ( a ) *Liability of claimants.* Any person making a claim for drawback will be liable for the full amount of the drawback claimed.
( b ) *Liability of importers.* An importer will be liable for any drawback claim made by another person with respect to merchandise imported by the importer in an amount equal to the lesser of: ( 1 ) The amount of duties, taxes, and fees that the person claimed with respect to the imported merchandise; or
( 2 ) The amount of duties, taxes, and fees that the importer authorized the other person to claim with respect to the imported merchandise.
( c ) *Joint and several liability.* Persons described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section will be jointly and severally liable for the amount described in paragraph (b).
#### Clarence S. Adam, Respondent, v. Embrotex, Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
EXHIBIT 4.10


CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

OF

ITLA CAPITAL STATUTORY TRUST VI


         THIS Certificate of Trust of ITLA Capital Statutory Trust VI (the "Trust") is being duly executed and filed
by the undersigned trustees, not in their individual capacities but solely as trustees,  to form a statutory trust under the
Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. Code § 3801 et seq.) (the "Act").


         1.         Name.  The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is ITLA Capital Statutory Trust VI. 


         2.         Delaware Trustee.  The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware
is Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company, 919 Market Street, 7th Floor, Wilmington, Delaware 19801.


         3.         Effective Date.  This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust, have duly executed this Certificate
of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a) of the Act.


		WELLS FARGO DELAWARE TRUST COMPANY


		By:	/s/ Edward L. Truitt, Jr.

		Name:	Edward L. Truitt, Jr.

		Title:	Vice President



			/s/ George W. Haligowski
George W. Haligowski, as Trustee


			/s/ Timothy M. Doyle
Timothy M. Doyle, as Trustee


			/s/ Don Nickbarg
Don Nickbarg, as Trustee
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case Number: 20-22477-CIV-MORENO

KENNETH HAAVE, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

ALL AMERICAN SECURITY SERVICES, 

INC. and SERGIO SALAS,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF FLSA SETTLEMENT AND FINAL 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the parties’ joint Motion for Approval of FLSA 

Settlement and Dismissal With Prejudice (D.E. 8), filed on July 10, 2020. 

THE COURT has considered the Motion, the settlement agreement, the pertinent portions of 

the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is 

ADJUDGED that the Motion for Approval of FLSA Settlement and Dismissal With Prejudice

is GRANTED and the settlement agreement is approved in accordance with Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. 

v. U.S. Dep’t of Labor, 679 F.2d 1350 (11th Cir. 1982). The Court retains jurisdiction for thirty days

to enforce the terms of the settlement. It is also

ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. And all pending motions 

are DENIED AS MOOT. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 14th of July 2020.

______________________________________

FEDERICO A. MORENO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record 

Case 1:20-cv-22477-FAM Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2020 Page 1 of 1
#### Charles E. GRIFFIN, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael BURVANT; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 01-17018.

D.C. No. CV-98-02078-GEB.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 28, 2002.

*656Before FERNANDEZ, RYMER and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Charles E. Griffin II, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to medical needs, retaliation, denial of access to the courts, conspiracy, and violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Frost v. Agnos,*152 F.3d 1124, 1128 (9th Cir.1998), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Griffin’s Eighth Amendment claim because Griffin failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether prison officials acted with deliberate indifference to his medical needs. *See id.*at 1130.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Griffin’s retaliation claim because Griffin failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the defendants’ actions served legitimate penological goals. *See Pratt v. Rowland,*65 F.3d 802, 806 (9th Cir.1995).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Griffin’s access to the courts claim because Griffin failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether he suffered an actual injury in his efforts to pursue a particular legal claim. *See Lewis v. Casey,*518 U.S. 343, 351, 116 S.Ct. 2174, 135 L.Ed.2d 606 (1996).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Griffin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1985 claim because he failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the defendants conspired to deprive him of a protected right. *See Giannini v. Real,*911 F.2d 354, 359 (9th Cir.1990).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Griffin’s ADA claim because the proper defendant in an ADA action is a “public entity” and not individual employees of that entity. *See Vinson v. Thomas,*288 F.3d 1145, 1155 (9th Cir. 2002); *cf. Miller v. Maxwell Int’l, Inc.,*991 F.2d 583, 587-88 (9th Cir.1993).

Griffin’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93021, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 151.21 Definitions. The following are general definitions for the purposes of this subpart in applying the provisions of Chapters 17 and 18, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202): ( a ) *Degree.* “Degree” or “sugar degree” means an International Sugar Degree as determined by polarimetric test performed in accordance with procedures recognized by the International Commission for Uniform Methods of Sugar Analysis. This test discloses the percentage of sucrose contained in the sugar.
( b ) *Total sugars.* “Total sugars” means the sum of the sucrose, the raffinose, and the reducing sugars.
[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17470, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51268, Dec. 21, 1988]
**A GENDA**  **Meeting on Spray Polyurethane Foam (SPF) Insulation**

**June 25, 2009 8:30 am** 

**– 3:00 pm**  **Room 4225, EPA East**  **1200 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20460**  **Attendees: EP** **A, NIOSH, OSHA, CPSC, ACC Center for Polyurethanes Industry, Spray**

**Polyuretha ne Foam Alliance Product Stewardship Committee**  **8:30 a.m. Welcome and Introductions** 

Bill Hanson, Associate Director, Office of Cross

- Media Programs, EPA’s Office of Policy, Economics and Innovation (OPEI) **8:40 a.m.**  **Purpose of Meeting**

Bill Hanson, EPA OPEI **8:50 a.m. EPA** 

**– Accurate Hazard Communication** 

Mary Cushmac, EPA’s Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) Information on component A A cc urate assessment of exposure potentials Kevin Sikora, E

astern Research Group (ERG), EPA Contractor Need for comprehensive hazard communication/ best practices William Swietlik, EPA OPEI Product marketing and advertisement Video demonstration **9:30 a.m. Discussion** 

**— CPI and SPFA**  **9 :**  **5 0**  **a.m. BREAK**  **1 0**  **: 00**  **a.m. Spray Polyurethane Processes** 

Daniel Almaguer and Kathleen Ernst , NIOSH Division of Applied Research & Technology (DART) NI OSH Alert

-- Spray

- on truck bed lining operations **1 0**  **: 45**  **a.m. Comparison of**  **SPF I**  **nsulation and T**  **ruck B**  **ed L**  **ining P**  **rocesses**

CPI and SPFA **1 1:**  **15 a.m.**  **OSHA and CPSC**  **Perspective**

Jim Maddux, R obin Ackerman, Janet Carter , OSHA Directorate of Standards and Guidance Trey e Thomas, CPSC Office of Hazard Identification and Reduction **11: 30**  **a .m**  **. Introduction to CPI**  **’s and SPFA**  **’s Stewardship Activities**  **12:00 p.m. LUNCH BREAK**  **1: 15**  **p.m. Exposure**  **Asse ssment** **/ Research**  **Gaps**

Carol Hetfield, EPA OPPT Robert Streicher and Kathleen Ernst, NIOSH DART Curing time , re - occupancy , dust and cutting, measuring total isocyanates **1:55 p.m .**  **Discussion**

**— CPI and SPFA**  **2: 15**  **p.m. Stewardship Goals**  **2:30 p.m. Meeting**  **O utcomes and**  **Next Steps**

Bill Hanson, EPA OPEI
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61867-61868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23511]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Hydraulic Institute, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 15, 2004, pursuant to 
section

[[Page 61868]]

6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Hydraulic Institute, Inc. 
(``HI'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Hydraulic 
Institute, Inc., Parsippany, NJ. The nature and scope of HI's standards 
development activities are: more than twenty pump standards for pumps 
prepared and updated in accordance with the canvass approval process of 
the American National Standards Institute (``ANSI''). The HI standards 
define a product, material, process or procedure relating to, inter 
alia, centrifugal, reciprocating, vertical, rotary, sealless, air 
operated or controlled volume metering pumps, with reference to one or 
more of the following: nomenclature, composition, construction, 
dimensions, tolerances, safety, operating characteristics, 
performances, quality, rating, testing and service. Further HI's 
supplier members and others participate in the development of 
guidelines and standards within the scope of, inter alia, motors and 
drives, monitoring devices, seals, housings, and more broad-based 
topics such as electronic data exchange, pump piping, intake design, 
viscosity correction, variable speed pumping and life cycle cost.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23511 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### §46a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 46a was editorially reclassified as section 6117 of this title.
### §59a. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–163, title I, §103(b), Nov. 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 1050

Section, Pub. L. 93–462, §1, Oct. 20, 1974, 88 Stat. 1388, related to purchase of office equipment or furnishings by House Members.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1989, see section 103(c) of Pub. L. 101–163, set out as an Effective Date of 1989 Amendment note under section 5540 of this title.
§ 146.25 Annual reconciliation. ( a ) *Report.* The operator shall prepare a reconciliation report within 90 days after the end of the zone/subzone year unless the port director authorizes an extension for reasonable cause. The operator shall retain that annual reconciliation report for a spot check or audit by Customs, and need not furnish it to Customs unless requested. There is no form specified for the preparation of the report.
( b ) *Information required.* The report must contain a description of merchandise for each zone lot or unique identifer, zone status, quantity on hand at the beginning of the year, cumulative receipts and transfers (by unit), quantity on hand at the end of the year, and cumulative positive and negative adjustments (by unit) made during the year.
( c ) *Certification.* The operator shall submit to the port director within 10 working days after the annual reconciliation report, a letter signed by the operator certifying that the annual reconciliation has been prepared, is available for Customs review, and is accurate. The certification letter must contain the name and street address of the operator, where the required records are available for Customs review; and the name, title, and telephone number of the person having custody of the records. Reporting of shortages and overages based on the annual reconciliation will be made in accordance with § 146.53. These reports must accompany the certification letter.
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the annual report of Sunburst Acquisitions III, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended August 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Scott MacCaughern, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Scott MacCaughernPrincipal Executive Officer Date: December 14, 2007
### §6301. Senators' salaries

Senators elected, whose term of office begins on the 3d day of January, and whose credentials in due form of law shall have been presented in the Senate, may receive their compensation from the beginning of their term.

(June 19, 1934, ch. 648, title I, §1, 48 Stat. 1022; Pub. L. 97–51, §112(b)(2), Oct. 1, 1981, 95 Stat. 963.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 33 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1981—Pub. L. 97–51 struck out "monthly" after "may receive their compensation".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1981 Amendment

Pub. L. 97–51, §112(e), Oct. 1, 1981, 95 Stat. 963, provided that: "The amendments and repeals made by this section [enacting section 5303 of this title and amending this section and sections 5306 and 4591 of this title] shall be effective in the case of compensation payable for months after December 1981."
<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 10(xxvii)

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                     TO THE
                       KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES, INC.
                  1999 NONQUALIFIED EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN

     WHEREAS, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (the "Company") established the
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. 1999 Nonqualified Employee Stock Option Plan
(the "Plan"), effective September 28, 1999, for the benefit of its eligible
employees and eligible employees of its subsidiaries;

     WHEREAS, the Company reserved the right to amend the Plan at any time,
subject to certain inapplicable limitations;

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in order to add a service
requirement to the definition of "Retirement";

     NOW, THEREFORE, with respect to options granted on or after May 16, 2000,
the last paragraph of Subparagraph (b)(6) (Exercise upon Retirement of Employee)
of Section 5 (Options) of the Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. 1999
Nonqualified Employee Stock Option Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:

             For purposes of this Plan, Retirement shall mean an Employee's
retirement from the Company or one of its Subsidiaries at or after attaining the
customary retirement age for the Employee's country (as determined by the
Company, in its sole discretion) and completing at least five years of
employment with the Company and its Subsidiaries, or before such time if
expressly agreed to by the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. has caused this
Amendment No. 1 to be executed as adopted by the Board of Directors of the
Company.


[Seal]                                      KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES, INC.



Attest: __________________              By: __________________________________

                                        Date: ________________________________
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-101   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 1 of 4

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-101   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 2 of 4

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-101   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 3 of 4

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS   Document 207-101   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023   Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 13.3



TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned, Lora Ho, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Spokesperson of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (the
Company), hereby certifies, to her knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  April 14, 2014



By:

/s/ Lora HoName:

Lora HoTitle:

Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Spokesperson




The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 15, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“Act”), JEDEC Solid State Technology Association (“JEDEC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: JEDEC Solid State Technology Association, Arlington, VA. The nature and scope of JEDEC's standards development activities are: To promote, develop, and coordinate open voluntary consensus standardization of terms, definitions, product characterization and operation, test methods, manufacturing support functions, product quality and reliability, mechanical outlines, solid state memories, and wireless interface networking systems. Technical and informational exchanges may take place directly between committees and their correspondents. It is a primary function of each committee to propose JEDEC standards and to formulate policies, procedures, formats, and other documents.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-23775  Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### Matthew Goldstein, Suing on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Other Stockholders of Singer Manufacturing Company, v. Milton C. Lightner et al.

Present—Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.