alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-42 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

March 3, 1999

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received four reports

from its Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards following the

Committee’s meeting February 3-6. The reports provide comments

on:

ˇ Resolution of generic safety issue B-61, “Allowable ECCS

equipment outage periods;”

ˇ SECY-98-244, “NRC Human Performance Plan;”

ˇ List of questions to be addressed for possible resolution of

key issues associated with the proposed revision to 10 CFR

50.59 (changes, tests and experiments);

ˇ NFPA 805, “Performance-based standard for fire protection

for light water reactor electric generating plants.”

Copies of the reports are available through the NRC’s Office

of Public Affairs, the NRC’s homepage (www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW) and

the Public Document Room.

###
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.7


                      THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
                        EXCEPT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION
                           5.10 OF THE TRUST AGREEMENT

CERTIFICATE NUMBER C-2                       NUMBER OF COMMON SECURITIES: 78,000

                    CERTIFICATE EVIDENCING COMMON SECURITIES

                                       OF

                         EASY GARDENER PRODUCTS TRUST I

                                COMMON SECURITIES
                  (LIQUIDATION AMOUNT $25 PER COMMON SECURITY)

         EASY GARDENER PRODUCTS TRUST I, a statutory trust created under the
laws of the State of Delaware (the "Trust"), hereby certifies that Easy Gardener
Products, Ltd. (the "Holder") is the registered owner of seventy-eight thousand
(78,000) common securities of the Trust representing an undivided beneficial
interest in the assets of the Trust and designated the Common Securities
(liquidation amount $25 per Common Security) (the "Common Securities"). Except
in accordance with Section 5.10 of the Trust Agreement (as defined below), the
Common Securities are not transferable and any attempted transfer hereof shall
be void. The designations, rights, privileges, restrictions, preferences and
other terms and provisions of the Common Securities are set forth in, and this
certificate and the Common Securities represented hereby are issued and shall in
all respects be subject to the terms and provisions of, the Second Amended and
Restated Trust Agreement of the Trust dated as of ____________, 2003, as the
same may be amended from time to time (the "Trust Agreement") including the
designation of the terms of the Common Securities as set forth therein. The
Trust will furnish a copy of the Trust Agreement to the Holder without charge
upon written request to the Trust at its principal place of business or
registered office.

         Upon receipt of this certificate, the Holder is bound by the Trust
Agreement and is entitled to the benefits thereunder.


<PAGE>


            In Witness Whereof, an Administrative Trustee (as defined in the
Trust Agreement) of the Trust has executed this certificate this ____ day of
_______ 2003.


                                         EASY GARDENER PRODUCTS TRUST I


                                         By:___________________________
                                         Name:   Richard M. Grandy
                                         Title:  not in his individual
                                                 capacity but solely as
                                                 Administrative Trustee


                                      -2-
### §117i. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 117i was editorially reclassified as section 2013 of this title.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Crack Growth Rates and Fracture Toughness of Irradiated Austenitic Stainless Steels in BWR Environments(NUREG/CR-6960)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6960, (PDF - 41.3 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** December 2006**Date Published:** March 2008

**Prepared by:** O.K. Chopra and W.J. Shack 

Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL  60439

S. Crane, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6388

Availability Notice

## Abstract

In light water reactors, austenitic stainless steels (SSs) are used extensively as structural alloys in reactor core internal components because of their high strength, ductility, and fracture toughness. However, exposure to high levels of neutron irradiation for extended periods degrades the fracture properties of these steels by changing the material microstructure (e.g., radiation hardening) and microchemistry (e.g., radiation–induced segregation). Experimental data are presented on the fracture toughness and crack growth rates (CGRs) of wrought and cast austenitic SSs, including weld heataffected-zone materials, that were irradiated to fluence levels as high as ≈ 2 x 1021 n/cm2 (E > 1 MeV) (≈ 3 dpa) in a boiling heavy water reactor at 288-300°C. The results are compared with the data available in the literature. The effects of material composition, irradiation dose, and water chemistry on CGRs under cyclic and stress corrosion cracking conditions were determined. A superposition model was used to represent the cyclic CGRs of austenitic SSs. The effects of neutron irradiation on the fracture toughness of these steels, as well as the effects of material and irradiation conditions and test temperature, have been evaluated. A fracture toughness trend curve that bounds the existing data has been defined. The synergistic effects of thermal and radiation embrittlement of cast austenitic SS internal components have also been evaluated.

**Paperwork Reduction Act Statement**

This NUREG does not contain information collection requirements and, therefore, is not subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

**Public Protection Notification**

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 239 (Thursday, December 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 64159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27039]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Cambrex 
High Point, Inc.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and 
applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the 
issuance of the proposed registration on or before February 11, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his 
authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority 
to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation 
and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of 
manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of 
controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with 
suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated 
to the Assistant Administrator of the DEA Diversion Control Division 
(``Assistant Administrator'') pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, 
appendix to subpart R.
    In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on July 
16, 2018, Cambrex High Point Inc., 4180 Mendenhall Oaks Parkway, High 
Point, North Carolina 27265 applied to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Drug
         Controlled substances             code          Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oxymorphone............................     9652  II
Noroxymorphone.........................     9668  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the above listed controlled 
substances in bulk for distribution to its customers.

    Dated: December 3, 2018.
John J. Martin,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-27039 Filed 12-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 227 (Monday, November 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 70421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28706]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday December 21, 2012.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the 
event that the times or dates of these or any future meetings change, 
an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the 
meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-28706 Filed 11-21-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
§ 147.510 What actions will the Federal Government take against a recipient determined to have violated this part? If a recipient is determined to have violated this part, as described in § 147.500 or § 147.505, the SBA may take one or more of the following actions— ( a ) Suspension of payments under the award;
( b ) Suspension or termination of the award; and
( c ) Suspension or debarment of the recipient under 13 CFR Part 145, for a period not to exceed five years.
COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 1

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 208-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2022 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 208-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2022 Page 2 of 2
§ 191.183 Articles manufactured or produced in the United States. ( a ) *Procedure for filing documents.* Except as otherwise provided, the drawback procedures prescribed in this part shall be followed as applicable to drawback under this subpart on articles manufactured or produced in the United States with the use of imported or substituted merchandise, and on flavoring extracts or medicinal or toilet preparations (including perfumery) manufactured or produced with the use of domestic tax-paid alcohol.
( b ) *Notice of transfer* — ( 1 ) *Evidence of export.* The notice of zone transfer on Customs Form 214 shall be in place of the documents under subpart G of this part to establish the exportation.
( 2 ) *Filing procedures.* The notice of transfer, in triplicate, shall be filed with the drawback office where the foreign trade zone is located prior to the transfer of the articles to the zone, or within 3 years after the transfer of the articles to the zone. A notice filed after the transfer shall state the foreign trade zone lot number.
( 3 ) *Contents of notice.* Each notice of transfer shall show the: ( i ) Number and location of the foreign trade zone;
( ii ) Number and kind of packages and their marks and numbers;
( iii ) Description of the articles, including weight (gross and net), gauge, measure, or number; and
( iv ) Name of the transferor.
( c ) *Action of foreign trade zone operator.* After articles have been received in the zone, the zone operator shall certify on a copy of the notice of transfer the receipt of the articles (see § 191.184(d)(2)) and forward the notice to the transferor or the person designated by the transferor, unless the export summary procedure, provided for in § 191.73, is used. If the export summary procedure is used, the requirements in § 191.73 shall be complied with, as applicable. The transferor shall verify that the notice has been certified before filing it with the drawback claim.
( d ) *Drawback entries.* Drawback entries shall be filed on Customs Form 7551 to indicate that the merchandise was transferred to a foreign trade zone. The “Declaration of Exportation” shall be modified as follows:
Declaration of Transfer to a Foreign Trade Zone I,____________________(member of firm, officer representing corporation, agent, or attorney), of ____________________, declare that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the particulars of transfer stated in this entry, the notices of transfer, and receipts are correct, and that the merchandise was transferred to a foreign trade zone for the sole purpose of exportation, destruction, or storage, not to be removed from the foreign trade zone for domestic consumption. Dated: Transferor or agent
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93021, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 151.62 Information on invoices. Invoices of wool or hair subject to duty at a rate per clean kilogram under Chapter 51, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202), shall show the following detailed information in addition to other information required: ( a ) Condition, that is, whether in the grease, washed, pulled, on the skin, scoured, carbonized, burr-picked, willowed, handshaken, or beaten;
( b ) Whether free of vegetable matter, practically free, slightly burry, medium burry, heavy burry;
( c ) Whether in the fleece, skirted, matchings, or sorted;
( d ) Length, that is, whether super combing, ordinary combing, clothing, or filling;
( e ) Country of origin, and, if possible, the province, section, or locality of production;
( f ) If wool, the type symbol by which it is bought and sold in the country of origin and the grade of each lot covered by the invoice, specifying the standard or basis used, that is, whether U.S. Official Standards or the commercial terms to designate grade in the country of shipment; and
( g ) Net weight of each lot of wool or hair covered by the invoice in the condition in which it is shipped, and the shipper's estimate of the clean yield of each lot by weight or by percentage.
[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17470, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51269, Dec. 21, 1988]
<PAGE>

DEARBORN BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-Q (continued)

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the "Form
10-Q") of Dearborn Bancorp, Inc. (the "Issuer").

         I, Michael J. Ross, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
         Issuer, certify that:

         (i)      The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                  (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)     The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Issuer.

Dated: August 10, 2004

                                            /s/ Michael J. Ross
                                      ------------------------------
                                               Michael J. Ross
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer,
                                             Dearborn Bancorp, Inc.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 97-038

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, March 5,

1997)

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $12,500 FINE AGAINST B&W FUEL COMPANY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has informed B&W

Fuel Company that it intends to fine the company $12,500 for

violations of NRC requirements at its Framatome Cogema commercial

nuclear fuels plant in Lynchburg, Va.

NRC bases this action on findings from a special inspection

last November which looked into the circumstances of a lowenriched, unirradiated uranium fuel assembly being inadvertently

returned from the Lynchburg plant to its point of origin in

Germany. The component involved was one of 180 fuel assemblies

of fresh, Russian-produced fuel originally intended for use in an

East German nuclear power plant, but never used.

NRC dispatched the inspection team on Nov. 13 after B&W

reported that one of the fuel assemblies was missing. The next

day, however, the company reported that the assembly had been

discovered in Germany in its original shipping cask.

Although the incident did not endanger public health and

safety, NRC considers it a significant regulatory concern because

of the company's loss of control over the enriched uranium, which

is classified as special nuclear material. Specifically, NRC has

concluded that B&W violated agency requirements by failing to

have adequate procedures for unloading shipment containers and by

failing to follow its existing procedures, both for unloading and

for material control and accounting practices. Inspectors also

found that the company did not adequately survey the shipping

container, which held the fuel assembly, before it was returned

to Germany. One result was that radioactive material was shipped

to an overseas location without proper recordkeeping and labeling

requirements being followed.
At a predecisional enforcement conference with NRC in

January, company officials described a number of corrective

measures they have taken to strengthen their procedures for the

handling of such shipments in the future and to improve their

employee training program.

B&W has 30 days to pay the civil penalty or to protest it.

If a protest is denied, the company may ask for a hearing.

###
§ 145.71 Exportation from continuous Government custody. ( a ) *Relief from duties.* Merchandise imported into the United States, unless nonmailable, may be exported by any class of mail without the payment of duties, if: ( 1 ) The merchandise has remained continuously in the custody of the Government (Customs or postal authorities); and
( 2 ) The mail articles containing such merchandise are inspected and mailed under Customs supervision.
( b ) *Waiver of right to withdraw.* Waiver of the right to withdraw the mail article from the mails shall be endorsed on each mail article to be so exported and signed by the exporter.
( c ) *Export entry or withdrawal required.* An export entry in accordance with § 18.25 of this chapter or a warehouse withdrawal for exportation in accordance with § 144.37 of this chapter, whichever is appropriate, shall be filed for merchandise being exported under this section, except for merchandise imported by mail which is either: ( 1 ) Unclaimed or refused and being returned by the Postal Service to the country of origin as undeliverable mail; or
( 2 ) For which a formal entry has not been filed and which is being remailed from continuous Customs or postal custody to Canada.
[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 13369, May 21, 1973, as amended at 38 FR 17470, July 2, 1973; T.D. 78-102, 43 FR 14455, Apr. 6, 1978]
###### Editorial Note on Part 181

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 181 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93026, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 181.54 Verification of claim for drawback, waiver or reduction of duties.

The allowance of a claim for drawback, waiver or reduction of duties submitted under this subpart shall be subject to such verification, including verification with the Canadian or Mexican customs administration of any documentation obtained in Canada or Mexico and submitted in connection with the claim, as Customs may deem necessary.
Case 1:20-cv-23279-MGC   Document 6   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/18/2020   Page 1 of 4

Case 1:20-cv-23279-MGC   Document 6   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/18/2020   Page 2 of 4

Case 1:20-cv-23279-MGC   Document 6   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/18/2020   Page 3 of 4

Case 1:20-cv-23279-MGC   Document 6   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/18/2020   Page 4 of 4
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-01-012 June 6, 2001

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH FLORIDA POWER OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS

SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Florida Power officials on

Monday, June 11, to discuss the results of NRC's annual assessment of safety performance at the

Crystal River nuclear power plant.

The meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m. at the Nuclear Operations Training Facility, 8200 W.

Venable Street in Crystal River. The public is invited to observe the meeting. NRC officials will be

available after the meeting to answer questions. The NRC will hold a second meeting with state and

local government officials after the first meeting. That second meeting is also open to the public.

A letter sent from NRC Region II to Florida Power, which addresses plant safety performance

during the previous year and forms the basis of the meeting discussion, is available from the Region II

Office of Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr. Current information for

the plant is available at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CR3/cr3_chart.html.

###
#### Edin FAKIC, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roseanne SONCHIK, District Director, United States Immigration and Naturalization Service; et al., Respondents-Appellees.

No. 01-15607.

D.C. No. CV-00-00083-KJD (RJJ).

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 28, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, WARDLAW, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Edin Fakic, a native and citizen of Bosnia, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment denying Fakie’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. *Baeta v. Sonchik,*273 F.3d 1261, 1263 (9th Cir. 2001). We dismiss Fakie’s petition as moot.

Fakie’s claims were based on an order that is no longer in effect, which has been *675superseded by an order deferring removal to Bosnia and Croatia. Further, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) has released Fakic from custody. Consequently, Fakic’s contentions that the INS should issue a final administrative order, release him from detention, and refrain from removing him to Croatia are moot. *See Picrin-Peron v. Rison,*930 F.2d 773, 775 (9th Cir.1991).

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.