alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No: II-98-26 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Friday, March 27, 1998)

NRC STAFF ISSUES ORDER SUSPENDING LICENSE

OF RADIOGRAPHY COMPANY IN PUERTO RICO

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued an Order to NDT Services,

Inc., of Caguas, Puerto Rico, which, effective immediately, suspends the company’s

license to use licensed radioactive material.

NRC officials said the Order was issued Friday, March 27, based on findings of

NRC inspections at temporary job sites at the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority’s

San Juan and Costa Sur power stations and an ongoing investigation by the NRC

Office of Investigations. An NRC letter transmitting the Order to the company said

agency findings to date have raised serious concerns regarding the company’s ability

and/or willingness to comply with NRC requirements and the company’s ability to

conduct licensed activities in a manner that adequately protects health and safety of

workers and the public.

The Order requires that the company: (1) immediately suspend all radiographic

operations authorized by its license; (2) notify the NRC by Saturday, March 28, of the

location, physical status and storage arrangements of licensed radioactive material; (3)

provide a 48-hour notice to the NRC’s Atlanta regional office prior to transferring

licensed radioactive material; (4) not receive any NRC-licensed radioactive materials

while the Order is in effect; and (5) maintain all records related to licensed activities in

their current form and not alter the records in any way.

The NRC inspections and an ongoing investigation by the agency’s Office of

Investigations indicated the company had not conducted all its activities in accordance

with its NRC requirements.

#
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1405

To disqualify certain persons from receiving Federal funds. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2003

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Government Reform 

A BILL

To disqualify certain persons from receiving Federal funds.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Truth in Financing 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DISQUALIFICATION FOR FEDERAL FUNDING. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any re8 cipient of Federal funds shall be disqualified for Federal 

9 funding of any type if, at a time when the recipient is 

10 receiving Federal funds for any of the recipient’s activi11 ties, the recipient is found by any Federal agency or Fed12 eral or State court to have—
2

•HR 1405 IH 

1 (1) made a false statement on an application 

2 for Federal funds; 

3 (2) violated any Federal law or regulation or 

4 State or local law punishable by imprisonment for at 

5 least 6 months or a fine of at least $5,000; and 

6 (3) aided or abetted the violation of any law or 

7 regulation described in paragraph (2). 

8 SEC. 3. CAUSE OF ACTION. 

9 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, or any 

10 judicial decision relating to issues of standing, any citizen 

11 of the United States may bring a private cause of action 

12 against any organization receiving Federal funds for vio13 lating the prohibition of section 2.

Æ
§ 122.77 Clearance certificate. ( a ) *Aircraft departing from the U.S.* One copy of the air cargo manifest shall be used as a clearance certificate when endorsed by the port director to show that clearance is granted.
( b ) *Scheduled aircraft.* If a scheduled aircraft clears at an airport which is not the airport at or nearest the place of final take-off from the U.S., two copies of the air cargo manifest shall be filed. One copy shall be used as a clearance certificate when endorsed by the director of the port where clearance is obtained, and the second copy shall be attached to the first for use at subsequent U.S. ports.
#### Vilter Manufacturing Company v. Dairymen’s League Co-operative Association, Inc.

Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 706.]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-86 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Monday, April 26, 1999)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received several

reports from its Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards

following the Committee’s meeting April 7-10. The reports

provide comments on:

ˇ Status of efforts on revising the Commission’s safety goal

policy statement;

ˇ Reevaluation of generic safety issue process;

ˇ SECY-99-017, “Proposed amendment to 10CFR 50.55a;”

ˇ Proposed rule on AP600 design certification;

ˇ Final rule: “Respiratory protection and controls to restrict

internal exposures, 10CFR part 20;”

ˇ Proposed final revision to 10CFR 50.65, “Requirements for

monitoring the effectiveness of maintenance at nuclear power

plants.”

Copies of the reports are available through the NRC’s Office

of Public Affairs, the NRC’s homepage (www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW) and

the Public Document Room.

#
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.3006 Certification not required. ( a ) *General.* Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, an importer will not be required to submit a copy of a certification under § 10.3004 for: ( 1 ) A non-commercial importation of a good; or
( 2 ) A commercial importation for which the value of the originating goods does not exceed U.S. $2,500.
( b ) *Exception.* If the Center director determines that an importation described in paragraph (a) of this section is part of a series of importations carried out or planned for the purpose of evading compliance with the certification requirements of § 10.3004, the Center director will notify the importer that for that importation the importer must submit a copy of the certification. The importer must submit such a copy within 30 days from the date of the notice. Failure to timely submit a copy of the certification will result in denial of the claim for preferential tariff treatment.
[77 FR 59069, Sept. 26, 2012, as amended by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93014, Dec. 20, 2016]
§ 18.13 Procedure; manifest. ( a ) *In-bond application required.* Baggage may be forwarded in-bond to another port of entry, or to a Customs station listed in § 101.4 of this chapter without examination or assessment of duty at the port or station of first arrival at the request of the passenger, the transportation company, or the agent of either, by filing an in-bond application in accordance with the provisions of § 18.1.
( b ) *Coast to coast transportation.* Baggage arriving in-bond or otherwise at a port on the Atlantic or Pacific coast, destined to a port on the opposite coast, may be laden under CBP supervision, without examination and without being placed in-bond, on a vessel proceeding to the opposite coast, provided the vessel will proceed to the opposite coast without stopping at any other port on the first coast.
Exhibit 10.3


                                    CONFIRMATION


TO: MICHAEL GREEN

         This is to confirm renewal of the employment agreement made as of
October 1, 2000, for a further one year period commencing on October 1, 2002,
and ending on September 30, 2003, under the same terms and conditions,
including, the terms relating to compensation.

         Dated at Markham this 1st day of October, 2002


         MIAD SYSTEMS LTD.


         Per:  /s/ Michael Green
               --------------------------
               Michael Green - President














MIAD Systems|Green confirm Empl-9-30-02


<PAGE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20- 22929-CIV-WILLIAMS

TRAINING FIRST FOR LIFE CORP 

d/b/a US1 FITNESS CENTER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE CO.,

Defendant.

/

ORDER REMANDING CASE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres’ Report

and Recommendation (DE 26) on Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (DE 20). Defendant did 

not file objections to the report, and the time to do so has passed.

Upon an independent review of the Report, the record, and applicable case law, 

it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report (DE 26) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (DE 20) is GRANTED. This case is REMANDED

to the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, in and for MiamiDade County.

3. Any and all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. 

4. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.

Case 1:20-cv-22929-KMW Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/02/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE AND ORDERED in chambers in Miami, Florida, this 2nd day of April, 

2021.

Case 1:20-cv-22929-KMW Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/02/2021 Page 2 of 2
### SUBCHAPTER VI—BOTANIC GARDEN AND NATIONAL GARDEN
### §714. Criers and messengers

(a) Each court of appeals may appoint a crier who shall be subject to removal by the court.

(b) The crier, with the approval of the court, may appoint necessary messengers in such number as the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts may approve. The crier may remove such messengers with the approval of the court. The crier shall also perform the duties of bailiff and messenger.

(Added Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §120(c)(1), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 33.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as an Effective Date of 1982 Amendment note under section 171 of this title.

#### Applicability of This Section to Court of Appeals for District of Columbia During Continued Service of Marshal for Court in Office on Apr. 2, 1982

Subsec. (a) of this section not applicable to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia during the continued service as Marshal for such Court of any individual who was serving in such office under section 713(c) of this title as of Apr. 2, 1982, see section 415 of Pub. L. 98–620, set out as a note under section 713 of this title.
EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-47122 and 333-44260), Form S-8/A (Nos. 33-52478
and 33-80952) and Form S-4 (Nos. 333-36387 and 333-61221) of Building Materials
Holding Corporation of our report dated March 8, 2002 relating to the financial
statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated March 8, 2002 relating to the
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


San Francisco, California
March 27, 2002
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00048

- CR

JOHN DANIEL STERNER v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 221st District Court of Montgomery County , Texas Trial Cause No. 11

- 06

- 06106

- CR

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 5, 2013
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-103 August 15, 2001

NRC ANNOUNCES OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING FOR LICENSE RENEWAL

APPLICATIONS FOR MCGUIRE, CATAWBA NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced the opportunity to request a hearing on an

application for renewal of the operating licenses for the McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, and

Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2. 

Duke Energy Corporation, the operator of the four units, submitted applications for the renewal

of all the operating licenses on June 13. A notice of receipt was published by NRC in the Federal

Register on July 16. The staff has determined that Duke Energy Corporation has submitted sufficient

information for the NRC to formally ìdocket,î or file, the applications and conduct a detailed review. 

The deadline for hearing requests is September 14. By that time, requests must be filed by

anyone whose interest might be affected by the license renewals and who wishes to participate as a

party to the proceeding. 

The McGuire nuclear facility is located 17 miles north-northwest of Charlotte, North Carolina,

in Mecklenburg County. The operating licenses for Units 1 and 2 expire on June 12, 2021, and

March 3, 2023, respectively. 

The Catawba nuclear facility is located 18 miles southwest of Charlotte, North Carolina, in York

County. The operating licenses for Units 1 and 2 expire on December 6, 2024, and February 24, 2026,

respectively. 

Requests for a hearing must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications

Staff. They may also be delivered to the NRC Public Document Room at 11555 Rockville Pike,

Rockville, Maryland. A copy of the request should also be sent to the Office of the General Counsel,

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, and to Michael S. Tuckman,

Executive Vice President, Nuclear Generation, Duke Energy Corporation, 526 South Church Street,

P.O. Box 1006, Charlotte, NC 28201-1006. Additional information about the opportunity for hearing

may be found in the Federal Register notice. 
Copies of the application are available on the NRC web site at 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/REACTOR/LR/index.html , and are also available through the NRCís

Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). Help in using ADAMS is

available by contacting the NRC Public Document room staff at 301-415-4737 or 

1-800-397-4209, or by sending a message to pdr@nrc.gov via e-mail. The application is available for

public inspection at the NRCís Public Document Room. 

In addition, copies of the license renewal applications for the McGuire and Catawba nuclear

stations are available at the J. Murrey Atkins Library at the University of North Carolina - Charlotte, in

Charlotte, NC, and at the Rock Hill Public Library in Rock, SC, respectively. 

###
§ 146.22 Admission of merchandise to a zone. ( a ) *Identification.* All merchandise will be recorded in a receiving report or document using a zone lot number or unique identifier. All merchandise, except domestic status merchandise for which no permit for admission is required under § 146.43, will be traceable to a Customs Form 214 and accompanying documentation.
( b ) *Reconciliation.* Quantities received will be reconciled to a receiving report or document such as an invoice with any discrepancy reported to the port director as provided in § 146.37.
( c ) *Incomplete documentation.* Merchandise received without complete Customs documentation or which is unacceptable to the inventory control and recordkeeping system will be recorded in a suspense account or record until documentation is complete or the system is capable of accepting the information, at which time it will be formally admitted to the zone under § 146.32 or 146.40. The receiving report or document will provide sufficient information to identify the merchandise and distinguish it from other merchandise. The suspense account or record will be completely documented for Customs review to explain the differences noted and corrections made.
( d ) *Recordation.* Merchandise received will be accurately recorded in the inventory system records from the receiving report or document using the zone lot number or unique identifier for traceability. The inventory record will state the quantity and date admitted, cost or value where applicable, zone status, and description of the merchandise, including any part or stock number.
( e ) *Harbor maintenance fee.* When imported cargo is unloaded from a commercial vessel at a U.S. port and admitted into a foreign trade zone, the applicant for admission of that cargo into the zone may be subject to the harbor maintenance fee as set forth in § 24.24 of this chapter.
[T.D. 86-16, 51 FR 5049, Feb. 11, 1986, as amended by T.D. 87-44, 52 FR 10211, Mar. 30, 1987; 52 FR 10970, Apr. 6, 1987]
§ 111.91 Grounds for imposition of a monetary penalty; maximum penalty. CBP may assess a monetary penalty or penalties as follows: ( a ) In the case of a broker, in an amount not to exceed an aggregate of $30,000 for one or more of the reasons set forth in § 111.53(a) through (g) other than those listed in § 111.53(b)(3), and provided that no license or permit suspension or revocation proceeding has been instituted against the broker under subpart D of this part for any of the same reasons; or
( b ) In the case of a person who is not a broker, in an amount not to exceed $10,000 for each transaction or violation referred to in § 111.4 and in an amount not to exceed an aggregate of $30,000 for all those transactions or violations.
[T.D. 00-17, 65 FR 13891, Mar. 15, 2000, as amended by CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63321, Oct. 18, 2022]
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

      KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below (each, a "Signatory" constitutes and appoints Philip E. Cline,
Todd R. Fry, Thomas J. Murray and Dan Konrad (each, an "Agent", and
collectively, "Agents") or any of them, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and
agent for and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each
Signatory further grants to the Agents, and each of them, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary, in the judgment of such Agent, to be done in connection with any such
signing and filing, as full to all intents and purposes as he might or could do
in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all that said Agents, or any of
them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

      This Power of Attorney may be executed simultaneously in one or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which
constitute but one and the same instrument.

Signature                                                           Date

/S/ MARSHALL T. REYNOLDS
_________________________________________                      March 30, 1999
Marshall T. Reynolds

/S/ PHILIP E. CLINE
_________________________________________                      March 29, 1999
Philip E. Cline

/S/ TODD B. FRY
_________________________________________                      March 29, 1999
Todd R. Fry

/S/ RONALD V. ARTHUR, II
________________________________________                       March 29, 1999
Ronald V. Arthur, II

/S/ GEORGE W. BROUGHTON
_________________________________________                      March 29, 1999
George W. Broughton

/S/ ROBERT E. EVANS
_________________________________________                      March 29, 1999
Robert E. Evans

/S/ CHARLES R. HOOTEN, JR.
________________________________________                       March 29, 1999
Charles R. Hooten, Jr.

/S/ NEAL W. SCAGGS
_________________________________________                      March 30, 1999
Neal W. Scaggs

/S/ MARTIN P. SHEARER
_________________________________________                      March 30, 1999
Martin P. Shearer

/S/ PHILIP TODD SHELL
_________________________________________                      March 29, 1999
Philip Todd Shell

/S/ KIRBY J. TAYLOR
_________________________________________                      March 29, 1999
Kirby J. Taylor

/S/ PAUL T. THEISEN
_________________________________________                      March 30, 1999
Paul T. Theisen

/S/ THOMAS W. WRIGHT
_________________________________________                      March 29, 1999
Thomas W. Wright
Exhibit 21



Midas, Inc.



Subsidiaries of the Registrant

As of January 3, 2004



|                                         |  |                       |  |                                                     |  
|---------------------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------- | -
|                                         |  | Place ofIncorporation |  | Percent of StockOwned orControlled bythe Registrant |  
|Midas, Inc. (Registrant)                 |  | Delaware              |  | 100                                                 | %
|Midas International Corporation          |  | Delaware              |  | 100                                                 | %
|Midas Illinois, Inc.                     |  | Illinois              |  | 100                                                 | %
|Midas Realty Corporation                 |  | Delaware              |  | 100                                                 | %
|Midas Properties, Inc.                   |  | New York              |  | 100                                                 | %
|Muffler Corporation of America           |  | Illinois              |  | 100                                                 | %
|Dealers Wholesale, Inc.                  |  | Delaware              |  | 100                                                 | %
|Huth, Inc.                               |  | Delaware              |  | 100                                                 | %
|International Parts Corporation          |  | Delaware              |  | 100                                                 | %
|Parts Warehouse, Inc.                    |  | Delaware              |  | 100                                                 | %
|Midas International Corporation (Wyo)    |  | Wyoming               |  | 100                                                 | %
|Progressive Automotive Systems, Inc.     |  | Delaware              |  | 100                                                 | %
|Cosmic Holdings LLC                      |  | Delaware              |  | 100                                                 | %
|MDS Automotive Holdings, B.V.            |  | Netherlands           |  | 100                                                 | %
|Midas Automotive International, B.V.     |  | Netherlands           |  | 100                                                 | %
|Midas Canada Holdings Ltd                |  | Canada                |  | 100                                                 | %
|Midas Canada Inc.                        |  | Canada                |  | 100                                                 | %
|Midas Realty Corporation of Canada, Inc. |  | Canada                |  | 100                                                 | %
|Cosmic Holdings Corporation              |  | Delaware              |  | 100                                                 | %