alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                    US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                           1,836,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,966,000
<PP&E>                                             409,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                     402,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,973,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              666,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            40,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,267,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,973,000
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      717,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (42,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (675,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (675,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.2
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.2



</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131549 & (27) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, RICHARD DELENE and NANCY DELENE, Justices 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 131549 

 COA: 267209 
 Baraga CC: 05-005461-CH 

D. HAYWOOD & ASSOCIATES, P.C., now 

known as HAYWOOD HARRISON, P.C., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the May 18, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0821 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

August 29, 2006 

 Clerk
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Argosy Gaming Company (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Richard J. Glasier, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/   Richard J. Glasier         |   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                  |   |
| Richard J. Glasier                    |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| August 13, 2003                       |   |

 

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENTREQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINEDBY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITSSTAFF UPON REQUEST.

 

----
ˇ ̨ ̋ ̨ ̧ ̊ ̇ ̆ ̄ ̃ˆı ̧Ù ̃Û ̇ ̄ˆÚÒıð ̧ÔÒÓÓÌÏÏÌÒÎ

Ì ̆ ̃ ̧Ò ̧ ̇ ̄Ì ̆ ̧ˆÌıÏ ̧Ù ̃ÛÌÒÎ ̧

 ̧ÙðˆÎ ̧ ̄ˆˆ ̧ ıÌ ̃ ̧ ̧ ̋ ̇ÌÚ ̃ ̧

ı ̄ÌÎÛÚÒÎ ̧ ̃ˆÏ ̧

Ù ̧ ̧ ̧ ̧ ̧ ̧ Ù ̧    ̧Ù ̋

Ô ̊Ô ̧ ̧ı ̃ ̆ ̧  ̃Î ̃ıÏÒÎ ̧  ̧ ̧ ̧ ̧  ̧ ̧ ̧ ̊Ò ̃Ó ̃ı ̧ ̧

Ô ̧ ̧ ̧

 ̊ÙÔ ̧Ù ̋ ̋ ̧ ̧ ̊ ̧ ̊ ̋ ̧  ̧ÙÙÔ ̊ ̧Ô  ̊ ̋

Ù ̧ ̊ ̧ ̧Ù  ̊ ̧ ̋ ̧ÙˇÙ  ̊ ̋

 ̃ ̧ ̊ ̇ ̆ ̄ ̃ˆı ̧Ù ̃Û ̇ ̄ˆÚÒıð ̧ÔÒÓÓÌÏÏÌÒÎ ̧ÏÚˆ ̧ˆÏ ̧ıÒÒÏ ̃ ̧ˆ ̧ ̧ÌÎ ̃ ̧ ˆÛˆÌÎÏÚ ̧ ̃ ̧ ̃ııˆ ̆ÒÎ ̧ÔÒÓˆÎÌ ̃Ï

Î ̆ ̨ ̧Ò ̧  ̃Î ̃ˆ ̧ˆÎÏˆÏ ̧Òı ̧ÌÒ ̄ˆÚÌÎÛ ̧ıˆÌˆÚÌÒÎ ̧Ïˆ ̃Úð ̧ı ̃ ̇Ìı ̃Ó ̃ÎÚÏ ̨

 ̧ ̊ÙÔ ̧Ì ̃ÎÚÌÌ ̃ ̧Ú ̃ ̧ÌÒ ̄ˆÚÌÒÎÏ ̧ ̇ıÌÎÛ ̧ˆÎ ̧ÌÎÏ ̃ ̆ÚÌÒÎ ̧ ̆ÒÓ ̄ ̃Ú ̃ ̧ ̆ÚÒ ̃ı ̧ ̨ ̧ ̧ ̃ ̧ ̊ÙÔ ̧Ì ̆ ̃ ̧Ò

Î ̃ÏÚÌÛˆÚÌÒÎÏ ̧ˆ ̄ÏÒ ̧ ̆ÒÎ ̇ ̆Ú ̃ ̧ˆÎ ̧ÌÎ ̃ÏÚÌÛˆÚÌÒÎ ̧ÌÎÚÒ ̧Ú ̃ ̧ÓˆÚÚ ̃ı ̧ˆÎ ̧ˆ ̧ ̇ ̄ ̄ ̧ı ̃ÒıÚ ̧ˆÏ ̧ÌÏÏ ̇ ̃ ̧ ̆ÚÒ ̃ı ̧ ̨ ̧ ̧ ̃ııˆ ̆ÒÎ

ˆÎ ̧ ̊ÙÔ ̧ÒÌ ̆Ìˆ ̄Ï ̧ÌÏ ̆ ̇ÏÏ ̃ ̧Ú ̃ ̧ÌÒ ̄ˆÚÌÒÎÏ ̧ˆÚ ̧ˆ ̧ı ̃ ̃ ̆ÌÏÌÒÎˆ ̄ ̧ ̃ÎÒı ̆ ̃Ó ̃ÎÚ ̧ ̆ÒÎ ̃ı ̃Î ̆ ̃ ̧ÒÎ ̧ ̆ÚÒ ̃ı ̧ ̧ˆÚ ̧Ú ̃ ̧ ̊ÙÔ Ï

Ù ̃ÛÌÒÎ ̧ ̧ÒÌ ̆ ̃ ̧ÌÎ ̧ı ̄ÌÎÛÚÒÎ ̧ ̃ˆÏ ̨

 ̃ ̧ ̊ÙÔ ̧ˆÏ ̧ ̃Ú ̃ıÓÌÎ ̃ ̧ÚˆÚ ̧ ̃ııˆ ̆ÒÎ ̧ ̃ ̄Ì ̃ıˆÚ ̃ ̄ð ̧ˆ ̄ ̄Ò ̃ ̧ ̃ıÏÒÎÎ ̃ ̄ ̧Ò ̧ˆ ̧ÎÒÚ ̧ı ̃ ̆ ̃Ì ̃ ̧ÒıÓˆ ̄

ÓˆÎ ̇ˆ ̆Ú ̇ı ̃ıÏ ̧Ò ̃ıˆÚÒı ̧Ïˆ ̃Úð ̧ÚıˆÌÎÌÎÛ ̧ÚÒ ̧Ò ̃ıˆÚ ̃ ̧ÒıÚˆ ̄ ̃ ̧Î ̇ ̆ ̄ ̃ˆı ̧Ûˆ ̇Û ̃Ï ̧ ̃ÏÌÚ ̃ ̧ˆ ̧ ̆ÒÓˆÎð ̧ ̆ÒÓÓÌÚÚÓ ̃ÎÚ ̧ÚÒ

ıÒÌ ̃ ̧Ï ̇ ̆ ̧ÚıˆÌÎÌÎÛ ̧ÌÎ ̧ÌÚÏ ̧ ̊ÙÔ ̧ ̄Ì ̆ ̃ÎÏ ̃ ̧ˆ ̄Ì ̆ˆÚÌÒÎ ̨ ̧ ̧ ̃ ̧Ò ̃ıˆÚÒıÏ ̧ˆ ̧ı ̃ ̆ ̃Ì ̃ ̧ÒÎ ̄ð ̧ÌÎÒ ̇Ï ̃ ̧ÚıˆÌÎÌÎÛ ̨

ÒıÚˆ ̄ ̃ ̧Î ̇ ̆ ̄ ̃ˆı ̧Ûˆ ̇Û ̃Ï ̧ ̆ÒÎÚˆÌÎ ̧ıˆÌÒˆ ̆ÚÌ ̃ ̧ÓˆÚ ̃ıÌˆ ̄ ̧ˆÎ ̧ˆı ̃ ̧ ̇Ï ̃ ̧ÌÎ ̧ ̆ÒÎÏÚı ̇ ̆ÚÌÒÎ ̧Òı ̧ÚÒ ̧Ó ̃ˆÏ ̇ı ̃ ̧Ú ̃

ÓÒÌÏÚ ̇ı ̃ ̧ ̆ÒÎÚ ̃ÎÚ ̧ˆÎ ̧ ̃ÎÏÌÚð ̧Ò ̧ÏÒÌ ̄ ̨ ̧ ̧ ÌÏ ̇Ï ̃ ̧Ò ̧Ú ̃ ̧Ûˆ ̇Û ̃Ï ̧ ̆Ò ̇ ̄ ̧ı ̃Ï ̇ ̄Ú ̧ÌÎ ̧Ú ̃ ̧Ò ̃ıˆÚÒı ̧Òı ̧ÒÚ ̃ıÏ ̧ı ̃ ̆ ̃ÌÌÎÛ ̧ˆ

ˆıÓ ̇ ̄ ̧ıˆÌˆÚÌÒÎ ̧ ̃ÒÏ ̇ı ̃ ̨

 ̊ÙÔ ̧Ù ̃ÛÌÒÎˆ ̄ ̧ÓÌÎÌÏÚıˆÚÒı ̧ ̄ ̄ÌÏ ̧  ̨ ̧  ̃ıÏ ̆Ò ̧ÌÎ ̧ˆ ̧ ̄ ̃ÚÚ ̃ı ̧ÚÒ ̧ ̃ııˆ ̆ÒÎ ̧ı ̃ÏÌ ̃ÎÚ ̧ ˆııð ̧ ˆÌÏÒÎ

ÏˆÌ ̧ ̄ÚÒ ̇Û ̧Ú ̃ı ̃ ̧ ̃ı ̃ ̧ÎÒ ̧Ïˆ ̃Úð ̧ ̆ÒÎÏ ̃ ̇ ̃Î ̆ ̃Ï ̧Ò ̧ÚÌÏ ̧ÌÒ ̄ˆÚÌÒÎ ̧Ú ̃ ̧ ̊ÙÔ ̧ ̆ÒÎÏÌ ̃ıÏ ̧ÚÌÏ ̧ˆ ̧ÓˆÚÚ ̃ı ̧Ò ̧ÏÌÛÎÌÌ ̆ˆÎÚ

ı ̃Û ̇ ̄ˆÚÒıð ̧ ̆ÒÎ ̆ ̃ıÎ ̧ ̃ ̆ˆ ̇Ï ̃ ̧ ̃ııˆ ̆ÒÎ ̧ ̆ÒÏ ̃ ̧Òı ̧ ̇ÏÌÎ ̃ÏÏ ̧ı ̃ˆÏÒÎÏ ̧ÚÒ ̧ÌÒ ̄ˆÚ ̃ ̧ÚÌÏ ̧ı ̃ ̇Ìı ̃Ó ̃ÎÚ ̨

 ̃ ̧ÌÒ ̄ˆÚÌÒÎ ̧ˆÏ ̧ ̃ ̃Î ̧ ̆ ̄ˆÏÏÌÌ ̃ ̧ˆÏ ̧ ̋ ̃ ̃ıÌÚð ̧  ̃ ̃ ̄ ̧ ̧ÒÎ ̧Ú ̃ ̧ ̊ÙÔÏ ̧Ò ̇ı ̄ ̃ ̃ ̄ ̧Ï ̆ˆ ̄ ̃ ̧Òı ̧Ì ̆ ̧Ú ̃ ̧ˆÏ ̃

 ̆ÌÌ ̄ ̧ ̃Îˆ ̄Úð ̧ÌÏ ̧ ̨ ̧ ̧  ̃ ̃ ̄ ̧ ̧ÌÒ ̄ˆÚÌÒÎÏ ̧ˆı ̃ ̧Ú ̃ ̧ÓÒÏÚ ̧Ï ̃ıÌÒ ̇Ï ̨ ̧ ̧ ̃ ̧ ̃Îˆ ̄Úð ̧ˆÏ ̧Ò ̇ ̄ ̃ ̧ˆÏ ̧ ̃ıÓÌÚÚ ̃ ̧ð ̧ ̊ÙÔ

Ò ̄Ì ̆ð ̧ ̃ ̆ˆ ̇Ï ̃ ̧Ú ̃ ̧ÌÒ ̄ˆÚÌÒÎ ̧ˆÏ ̧ÌÏ ̆Ò ̃ı ̃ ̧ð ̧ ̊ÙÔ ̧ÌÎÏ ̃ ̆ÚÒıÏ ̧ˆÏ ̧ ̃ ̃Ó ̃ ̧Ì ̄ ̄ ̇ ̄ ̧ˆÎ ̧ ̆Òıı ̃ ̆ÚÌ ̃ ̧ˆ ̆ÚÌÒÎÏ ̧ÚÒ ̇Û

ˆ ̃ ̇ˆÚ ̃ ̧ ̃ı ̃ ̧ÎÒÚ ̧ ̃ ̃Ó ̃ ̧ÚÒ ̧ ̃ ̧ ̆ÒÓı ̃ ̃ÎÏÌ ̃ ̨

 ̃ııˆ ̆ÒÎ ̧ÌÏ ̧ı ̃ ̇Ìı ̃ ̧ÚÒ ̧ı ̃ÏÒÎ ̧ÌÎ ̧ıÌÚÌÎÛ ̧ÚÒ ̧Ú ̃ ̧ ̊ÙÔ ̧Ò ̆ ̇Ó ̃ÎÚÌÎÛ ̧Ú ̃ ̧Ï ̃ ̆ÌÌ ̆ ̧ˆ ̆ÚÌÒÎÏ ̧Úˆ ̃Î ̧ˆÎ ̧ˆÎð

ˆÌÚÌÒÎˆ ̄ ̧ˆ ̆ÚÌÒÎÏ ̧ ̄ˆÎÎ ̃ ̧ÚÒ ̧ı ̃ ̃ÎÚ ̧ˆ ̧ı ̃ ̆ ̇ıı ̃Î ̆ ̃ ̧Ò ̧Ú ̃ ̧ÌÒ ̄ˆÚÌÒÎÏ ̨

 ̃ ̧ ̆ÒÓˆÎð ̧ˆÏ ̧ ̧ˆðÏ ̧ÚÒ ̧ˆð ̧Ú ̃ ̧ÌÎ ̃ ̧Òı ̧Ì ̄ ̃ ̧ˆ ̧ıÒÚ ̃ÏÚ ̨ ̧ ̧ ̧Ú ̃ ̧ıÒÚ ̃ÏÚ ̧ÌÏ ̧ ̃ÎÌ ̃ ̧Ú ̃ ̧ ̆ÒÓˆÎð ̧Óˆð ̧ı ̃ ̇ ̃ÏÚ ̧ˆ

 ̃ˆıÌÎÛ ̨
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-163 October 19, 2000

NRC ANNOUNCES OPPORTUNITY FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON TURKEY POINT

NUCLEAR POWER PLANT LICENSE RENEWAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced the opportunity to request an evidentiary

hearing on a request for renewal of the operating licenses for Units 3 and 4 of the Turkey Point Nuclear

Power Plant. The facility is operated by Florida Power & Light (FP&L) Company, and is located near

Florida City, Florida.

FP&L is seeking a 20-year extension of the current Turkey Point licenses, which expire on July

19, 2012, for Unit 3, and April 10, 2013, for Unit 4. The NRC staff has begun reviewing both safety

and environmental aspects of the application, received on September 11.

The deadline for hearing requests is November 13 -- 30 days after the Federal Register notice

was published. By that time, petitions requesting a hearing and leave to intervene must be filed by

anyone whose interest might be affected by the license renewal and who wishes to participate as a party

to the proceeding.

Petitions for a hearing and leave to intervene must be filed with the Secretary of the

Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 20555, Attention:

Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. They may also be delivered to the NRC Public Document

Room at 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor) Rockville, Maryland, 20855-2738. A copy of the petition

should also be sent to the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, and to Thomas F. Plunkett, President - Nuclear Division, Florida

Power & Light Company, P.O. Box 14000, Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420.

More information about the opportunity for hearing may be found in a Federal Register notice

published on October 12. A complete list of the steps in the license renewal review process and more

detailed information about nuclear plant license renewal can be found at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/REACTOR/LR/index.html on the NRC web site.

###
### §1723. Service of members; meetings

#### (a) Reimbursement of expenses

Members of the Board shall serve without pay, but may receive travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, in accordance with sections 5702 and 5703 of title 5.

#### (b) Conflict of interest

The Librarian shall establish rules and procedures to address any potential conflict of interest between a member of the Board and responsibilities of the Board.

#### (c) Meetings

The Board shall meet at least once each fiscal year. Meetings shall be at the call of the Librarian.

#### (d) Quorum

Eleven members of the Board shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business.

(Pub. L. 106–474, title I, §123, Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2089.)
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-98-68 June 10, 1998

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC SENDS SPECIAL TEAM TO VERMONT YANKEE TO CHECK

CIRCUMSTANCES OF SHUTDOWN

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission team has begun a special inspection at the

Vermont Yankee nuclear plant power plant in Vernon, Vt., to look into the

circumstances surrounding a shutdown Tuesday (June 9).

The plant’s reactor protection system automatically shut down both the reactor

and the turbine after receiving a signal of an abnormally high water level in the

reactor vessel. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. believes the apparent cause

was a malfunctioning feedwater regulating valve. The initial response by plant

equipment and personnel to the shutdown was as expected. No radiation was

released because of the shutdown.

But a number of problems subsequently occurred: both a main feedwater

pump and a recirculation pump motor generator shut down, and the main steam

isolation valves closed. Vermont Yankee has begun an investigation.

The NRC team will review the causes, safety implications, and associated

licensee actions. A written report of the team’s findings will be publicly available

about six weeks after the on-site portion of the inspection is completed this week.

#
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S MARCH 31, 2000 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,790
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,365
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,625
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,743
<PP&E>                                         140,058
<DEPRECIATION>                                  74,199
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 176,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,736
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           757
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,329
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   176,540
<SALES>                                         78,773
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,773
<CGS>                                           70,318
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,162
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   234
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (106)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,623)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,291
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,914)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,914)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42


</TABLE>
§ 113.54 Cancellation of erroneous charges. ( a ) *Bonds.* Section 172.11(b) of this chapter sets forth provisions relating to the cancellation of charges against the bond when it is determined that the act or omission forming the basis for the claim for liquidated damages did not in fact occur.
( b ) *Carnets.* Section 114.34 of this chapter sets forth provisions relating to the cancellation of erroneous charges involving carnets.
[T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41171, Oct. 19, 1984, as amended by T.D. 00-57, 65 FR 53575, Sept. 5, 2000]
```

[106th Congress Public Law 338]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ338.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 1312]]

Public Law 106-338
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 114 Ridge Street, N.W. in Lenoir, North Carolina, as the ``James T. 
Broyhill Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 19, 2000 -  [H.R. 4534]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 114 
Ridge Street, N.W. in Lenoir, North Carolina, shall be known and 
designated as the ``James T. Broyhill Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James T. Broyhill Post Office 
Building''.

    Approved October 19, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4534:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Sept. 6, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Appendix B – Emissions Inventory

The file size of this document is greater than 50MB. Because of its unusually large size, this 

document is not available for download from www.regulations.gov. Copies of this document are 

available for public inspection at the EPA Region III address listed in the Federal Register Proposed 

Rules document. For further information, EPA Region III’s point of contact (POC) is listed in this 

docket.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-108 July 10, 2000

NRC CHAIRMAN RICHARD A. MESERVE

TO HAVE PRESS AVAILABILITY IN LAS VEGAS

Dr. Richard A. Meserve, Chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, is visiting

Yucca Mountain, Nevada, this week and will be available to speak to the media at 1:00 p.m. Friday in

Las Vegas at the McCarran International Airport, Room 6B, Main Terminal.

The Chairman will tour the site of a possible high-level radioactive waste repository at Yucca

Mountain on Thursday, and will meet with state, local and Tribal officials and citizens groups on

Friday morning.

He also will answer questions from interested news media on topics affecting Yucca Mountain

and the NRC’s role and activities regarding the site.

Dr. Meserve was sworn in as Chairman of the NRC on October 29 of last year. Prior to that he

was a partner in the Washington, D.C., law firm of Covington & Burling, having joined the firm in

1981. From 1977 to 1981, Dr. Meserve served on the White House staff as legal counsel to the

President’s Science and Technology Advisor. He holds a B.A. degree from Tufts University, a law

degree from Harvard University and a Ph.D. in applied physics from Stanford University.

Media should call Hilarie Grey, 702/261-3094 at McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas

for parking arrangements.

###
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.874 Textile or apparel goods. ( a ) *De minimis* — ( 1 ) *General.* Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, a textile or apparel good that is not an originating good under the OFTA because certain fibers or yarns used in the production of the component of the good that determines the tariff classification of the good do not undergo an applicable change in tariff classification set out in General Note 31(h), HTSUS, will be considered to be an originating good if the total weight of all such fibers or yarns is not more than seven percent of the total weight of that component.
( 2 ) *Exception.* A textile or apparel good containing elastomeric yarns in the component of the good that determines the tariff classification of the good will be considered to be an originating good only if such yarns are wholly formed in the territory of a Party.
( b ) *Textile or apparel goods put up in sets.* Notwithstanding the specific rules specified in General Note 31(h), HTSUS, textile or apparel goods classifiable as goods put up in sets for retail sale as provided for in General Rule of Interpretation 3, HTSUS, will not be considered to be originating goods under the OFTA unless each of the goods in the set is an originating good or the total value of the non-originating goods in the set does not exceed ten percent of the appraised value of the set.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-77 November 6, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC BANS PRESIDENT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMPANY

FROM NRC-LICENSED ACTIVITIES FOR THREE YEARS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued an order banning David D. Klepadlo from

NRC-licensed activities for three years for providing false information to the NRC regarding the

location of two gauges containing radioactive material. The order is effective immediately.

Mr. Klepadlo is the president of David D. Klepadlo & Associates in Moosic, Pa. The

company’s license to possess two gauges was revoked by the NRC in August 1999 for non-payment of

fees. During a phone conversation with an NRC inspector and in a letter to the NRC, Mr. Klepadlo

claimed the gauges had been transferred back to the manufacturer. When repeated attempts by the

NRC to verify the disposition of the gauges failed, the NRC conducted an inspection at the company’s

facility in February of this year. The inspector found both gauges stored at the facility.

The NRC has concluded that Mr. Klepadlo violated the requirement that information provided

to the NRC be complete and accurate in all material respects, and caused his company to be in

violation of NRC requirements.

In the order, Carl J. Paperiello, NRC Deputy Executive Director for Materials, Research and

State Programs, said, “deliberately and knowingly providing false information to the NRC calls into

question his [Mr. Klepadlo’s] trustworthiness and reliability, and raises serious questions as to whether

he can be relied up to comply with NRC requirements and to provide complete and accurate

information to the NRC.”

Mr. Klepadlo has 20 days to respond to this order.

###
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 5/8/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

BOBBY BATTLE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

and )

)

OLEN KENNEDY, )

)

Plaintiff-Appellant, )

)

v. ) No. 95-7085

) (D.C. No. CV-72-95)

LARRY FIELDS, a Successor of Park ) (E.D. Oklahoma)

Anderson, )

)

Defendant-Appellee. )

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, BARRETT and LOGAN, Circuit Judges.
2

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff Olen Kennedy appeals the dismissal, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), of his

Application for Citation for Contempt filed under the caption of this class action. 

Plaintiff’s application focuses on a paragraph in Battle v. Anderson, 376 F. Supp. 402

(E.D. Okla. 1974), in which the court ruled that it was the responsibility of the court “to

order that all violations of federal constitutional and civil rights, and of rights and

privileges secured by the laws, regulations and policies of the State of Oklahoma, cease

forthwith.” Id. at 427-28. He contends that as a member of the class he is entitled to

relief based upon the decision in Battle. The gist of his contention is that though he is

serving a life sentence he is entitled to statutory and earned credits under an Oklahoma

statute calculated on the basis of a forty-five-year term, which when combined with the

time he has already served (since 1973) discharges his life sentence, entitling him to

release from prison. The prison officials apparently keep a record of those credits for all

prisoners, but take the position that for servers of life sentences, the credits are only for

consideration of the parole board; that such prisoners are never legally entitled to reduce

their life sentence with such credits.
3

We agree with the district court that plaintiff’s claims are not within the issues

raised in Battle, which addressed conditions of confinement that allegedly violated the

Constitution. The district court correctly dismissed plaintiff’s claims because they are

beyond the scope of Battle and may only be heard independent of that litigation. See

Facteau v. Sullivan, 843 F.2d 1318, 1319-20 (10th Cir. 1988). Plaintiff’s complaint does

not state a claim cognizable in federal court, as it raises no federal constitutional question,

only issues of Oklahoma law.

AFFIRMED.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

James K. Logan

Circuit Judge