alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### PAPER SUPPLY CO., Appellant, v. MACDONALD, Respondent

(182 N. W. 526.)

(File No. 4802.

Opinion filed April 2, 1921.)

Appeals — Order Setting Aside Default Permitting Defense, Before Judgment Entry — Appeal Dismissed — Statute.

An order setting aside a default and permitting defendant to answer and defend, before judgment entered, is not appealable under Sec. 3168, Code 1919; it not being a final order within Subd. 2 authorizing appeal from “a final order affecting a substantial right made! in a special proceeding or upon a summary application in an action after judgment;” nor was the order appealed from made “after judgment.” Weber v. Tschetter, 1 S. D. 205 commented upon.

McCoy, J., not sitting.

Appeal from County Court, Spink County. Hon. E. W. Coolidge, Judge.

Action by the Paper Supply Company, a corporation, against J. MacDonald. Eroni an order setting aside a default and permitting defendant to answer and defend, plaintiff appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

*M. B. Culhane,*for Appellant.

*Roy T. Bull,*for Respondent.

WHITING, J.

This matter is in this court upon an appeal from1 an order setting aside a default and permitting defendant to answer and defend. No judgment has been entered. Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order, sought to be appealed from, is not appealable. Section 3:168, Rev. Code, enumerates the orders that are reviewable by this court, and, by enumerating such orders as may be reviewed, it necessarily excludes all those not so enumerated.

We fail to find anything in section 3168 that authorizes this *101appeal. Certainly there is no provision of such section that could be thought to warrant such appeal, other than subdivision 2 of such section, which authorizes an appeal from—

> “a final order affecting a substantial right, miade in a special proceeding or upon a summary application in an action after judgment.”

The order before us was not a “final order” (Ledebuhr v. Grand Grove, etc., 97 Wis. 341, 72 N. W. 884; Port Huron E. & T. Co. v. Rude, 101 Wis. 324, 77 N. W. 177), and certainly it was not made “after judgment.” In Weber v. Tschetter, 1 S. D. 205, 46 N. W. 201, this court apparently overlooked the fact that the order before it was not “a final order.” It will be noted that the order before us is one granting leave to answer, and not one denying such privilege.

The appeal is dismissed.

McCOY, J., not sitting.
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1368

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 8, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 7554 Pacific Avenue in Stockton, California, 

as the ‘‘Norman D. Shumway Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1368 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 7554 Pacific Avenue in Stockton, California, shall 

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘Norman D. Shumway 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Norman D. Shumway Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives April 7, 2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
§ 191.184 Merchandise transferred from continuous Customs custody. ( a ) *Procedure for filing claims.* The procedure described in subpart O of this part shall be followed as applicable, for drawback on merchandise transferred to a foreign trade zone from continuous Customs custody.
( b ) *Drawback entry.* Before the transfer of merchandise from continuous Customs custody to a foreign trade zone, the importer or a person designated in writing by the importer for that purpose shall file with the drawback office a direct export drawback entry on Customs Form 7551 in duplicate. The drawback office shall forward one copy of Customs Form 7551 to the zone operator at the zone.
( c ) *Certification by zone operator.* After the merchandise has been received in the zone, the zone operator shall certify on the copy of Customs Form 7551 the receipt of the merchandise (see paragraph (d)(2) of this section) and forward the form to the transferor or the person designated by the transferor, unless the export summary procedure, provided for in § 191.73, is used. If the export summary procedure is used, the requirements in § 191.73 shall be complied with, as applicable. After executing the declaration provided for in paragraph (d)(3) of this section, the transferor shall resubmit Customs Form 7551 to the drawback office in place of the bill of lading required by § 191.156.
( d ) *Modification of drawback entry* — ( 1 ) *Indication of transfer.* Customs Form 7551 shall indicate that the merchandise is to be transferred to a foreign trade zone.
( 2 ) *Endorsement.* The transferor or person designated by the transferor shall endorse Customs Form 7551 as follows, for execution by the foreign trade zone operator: Certification of Foreign Trade Zone Operator The merchandise described in the entry was received from ____________ on __________________, 19____; in Foreign Trade Zone No.____________, (City and State) Exceptions ____________ (Name and title) By ____________ (Name of operator)
( 3 ) *Transferor's declaration.* The transferor shall declare on Customs Form 7551 as follows:
Transferor's Declaration I, ____________________ of the firm of____________________, declare that the merchandise described in this entry was duly entered at the customhouse on arrival at this port; that the duties thereon have been paid as specified in this entry; and that it was transferred to Foreign Trade Zone No. ______, located at ____________, (City and State) for the sole purpose of exportation, destruction, or storage, not to be removed from the foreign trade zone for domestic consumption. I further declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief, this merchandise is in the same quantity, quality, value, and package, unavoidable wastage and damage excepted, as it was at the time of importation; that no allowance nor reduction of duties has been made for damage or other cause except as specified in this entry; and that no part of the duties paid has been refunded by drawback or otherwise. Dated: (Transferor)
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-147 December 30, 2002

NRC SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON DRAFT REVIEW STANDARD

FOR EARLY SITE PERMIT APPLICATIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is requesting comments on its draft review standard for

early site permit (ESP) applications for nuclear power plants.

The ESP process is intended to permit resolution of site-related issues regarding possible future

construction and operation of a nuclear power plant at a site selected by an applicant. The review

standard will be used by NRC staff in its review of an ESP application and informs potential applicants

and other stakeholders of the information the staff needs to perform its review.

The draft review standard is available for public inspection and duplication through the NRC’s

Public Document Room located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland,

and from ADAMS, the NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System. ADAMS is

accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html

 . Help in using ADAMS is available from the Public Document Room staff by calling 1-800-397-

4209.

Any interested person may submit comments on the draft review standard. However, to be 

certain of consideration, comments must be received by March 31, 2003. Comments received after the

due date will be considered if it is practical to do so. Written comments on the review standard should

be sent to: Director, New Reactor Licensing Project Office, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation,

Mailstop O-4D9A, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001. Comments

may be hand-delivered to the NRC at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, between 7:45 a.m.

and 4:15 p.m. on Federal workdays. Comments may be submitted electronically by the Internet to the

NRC at esprs@nrc.gov. 

All comments received by the Commission will be available electronically at the Commission’s

Public Document Room in Rockville, Maryland, or from ADAMS. 

For further information Contact : Michael L. Scott, Project Manager, New Reactor Licensing

Project Office, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555. Mr. Scott may be

contacted at (301) 415-1421 or by e-mail at mls3@nrc.gov.
###
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             854
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                       211
<INVENTORY>                                      2,470
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,430
<PP&E>                                          17,525
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,426
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,875
<BONDS>                                            795
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,663
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,966
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,589
<SALES>                                         61,964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,964
<CGS>                                           49,030
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 117
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,626
<INCOME-TAX>                                       638
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                987
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       987
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24
<FN>
<F1>
WE HAVE CALCULATED EARNINGS PER SHARE AMOUNTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128
"EARNINGS PER SHARE." WE HAVE ENTERED BASIC AND DILUTED AMOUNTS IN PLACE OF
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>


</TABLE>
### §61d–3. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–199, div. H, §155(b)(1), Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 450

Section, acts Pub. L. 104–53, title I, §2, Nov. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 517; Pub. L. 105–275, title I, §2(a), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2433, related to the Office of the Chaplain Expense Revolving Fund. See section 6654 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable with respect to fiscal year 2004 and each fiscal year thereafter, see section 6654(c) of this title.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (i)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s / Jeffrey L. KarafaJeffrey L. KarafaTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer,Dearborn Bancorp, Inc.
 44
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.452 Exclusions. A good will not be considered to be an originating good and a material will not be considered to be an originating material by virtue of having undergone: ( a ) Simple combining or packaging operations; or
( b ) Mere dilution with water or with another substance that does not materially alter the characteristics of the good or material.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Adi
Raviv, certify that:

1.  I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of U.S. Wireless Data, Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: February
23, 2004

/s/ Adi
RavivAdi Raviv
Executive Vice President and
          Chief Financial Officer
          (Principal Financial Officer)

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.1023 Packing materials and containers for shipment.

(a) *Effect on tariff shift rule.* Packing materials and containers for shipment, as defined in § 10.1013(m) of this subpart, are to be disregarded in determining whether the non-originating materials used in the production of the good undergo an applicable change in tariff classification set out in General Note 33, HTSUS. Accordingly, such materials and containers are not required to undergo the applicable change in tariff classification even if they are non-originating.

(b) *Effect on regional value content calculation.* Packing materials and containers for shipment, as defined in § 10.1013(m) of this subpart, are to be disregarded in determining the regional value content of a good imported into the United States. Accordingly, in applying the build-down, build-up, or net cost method for determining the regional value content of a good imported into the United States, the value of such packing materials and containers for shipment (whether originating or non-originating) is disregarded and not included in AV, adjusted value, VNM, value of non-originating materials, VOM, value of originating materials, or NC, net cost of a good.

# Example.

Korean producer A produces good C. Producer A ships good C to the United States in a shipping container that it purchased from Company B in Korea. The shipping container is originating. The value of the shipping container determined under § 10.1016(a)(2) of this subpart is $3. Good C is subject to a regional value content requirement. The transaction value of good C is $100, which includes the $3 shipping container. The U.S. importer decides to use the build-up method, RVC = (VOM/AV) × 100 (*see* § 10.1015(c) of this subpart), in determining whether good C satisfies the regional value content requirement. In determining the AV, adjusted value, of good C imported into the U.S., paragraph (b) of this section and the definition of AV require a $3 deduction for the value of the shipping container. Therefore, the AV is $97 ($100−$3). In addition, the value of the shipping container is disregarded and not included in the VOM, value of originating materials.
CENTRAL

DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC

OF THE CONGO

UGANDA

KENYA

ETHIOPIA

AFRICAN

REPUBLIC

Lake

Turkana

Lake

Albert

Bahr Al Jebel

Kangen

Sobat

Bahr Al Jebel

White Nile

SOUTHERN

DARFUR

UPPER NILE

BLUE

NILE

JONGLEI

EASTERN

EQUATORIA

WESTERN

EQUATORIA

WESTERN BAHR

AL GHAZAL

NORTHERN

B.A.G.

SOUTHERN

KORDOFAN

WESTERN

KORDOFAN

UNITY

BAHR AL JEBEL

LAKES

WARAB

Duar

Leer

Rumbek

Abuyong

Yirol

Ganyiel

Nyal

Yei

Tambura

Acumcum

Akok

Akuem

Ajiep

Bieh

Bow

Kuey

Nhialdiu

Leithnom

Gogrial

Thokchak

Tajiel Gumriak

Padit

Biem

Malual

Mankien

Ninger

Wicok

Buoth

Kier

Mapel

Bararud

Nyamlell

Marial Bai

Toy

Thiet

Akop

Alek

Maulual Akon 

Juba Kapoeta

Torit

Wau

Aweil

Bentiu

Lafon

Pibor

Malakal

Raga

Bor

Keili

Nasir

r

r r

HEGLIG

UNITY

ADAR/YALE (

AIR ACCESS IN

SOUTHERN SUDAN

JULY 2002

Access Denied by GOS

GOS Garrison Towns

Denial of Relief Zone

SOURCE: NGOs and human rights organizations

working on the ground in Sudan

7/15/02
Exhibit 13.1

TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED

Certification

Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned, Mark Liu, President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Companys annual report on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                   
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 13, 2015 |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                   
|                     |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Mark Liu                                                      
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Name:  Mark Liu
Title:    President and Co-Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
UNITED STATE S DISTRICT COURT FO R T HE DI ST RI CT OF CO LU MB IA

____________________________________ ) ALAN C OLTER, ) ) Pe tit ion er, ) ) v. ) Ci vilAc tio n N o. 09 -04 06 (E SH ) ) ) UNITED STATE S OF AMERICA, ) ) Re sp on de nt . ) ____________________________________) ME MOR

AN DU M OP IN ION This matter is before the Court on a petit ion for a writ of habeas corpus
. For the reas ons set forth below, the Court will dis miss the case for lack of juri sdiction. Petitione r, who is proceedi ng pro s e , was indicted i n the SuperiorCourt of the Distri ct of Columbia and is currentl y being held in t he Distric t’s Correc tional Tre atment Facility whil e he
aw ait s tr ial . H e ra ise s a n um be r of ch all en ge s to his de tentio n and to t he pro cee din gs in t

hat
co urt , in clu din g la ck

of pro ba ble cau se, ill eg al arre st and search an d s eiz ure of

his pro pe rtyin vio lat ion of the Fo urt h A m en dm ent, r eli an ce o n inva lid arr est warrants ba sed

on fa lsi fi ed po lic e statem ents, bia s an d a

bu se o f d isc ret ion

bySu pe rio r C ourt j ud ge s, pro sec uto ria l m isc on du ct, ins uf fi cie nt e vid en ce, vio lat ion of his Si xth Am en dm ent ri gh t to ef

fe cti ve ass ist an ce o f c ouns el
an d d en ial of

du e p roc ess . In effect, petiti oner is see king review of an ongoing cr iminal proceeding in Super ior Court. This Court, however, l acks subjectmatter jurisdi ction to r eview the act ions or rul ings of other court s. Se e 28 U. S. C. §§ 13 31 , 1 33 2 (g en era l juris dic tio na l pr ov isi on s); Flem ing v. Un ite d2

Sta tes , 847 F. Supp. 170, 172 (D.D.C. 1994), cer t. d en ied, 513 U.S. 1150 (1995). Moreover, t he Court’s mandam

us authorit y extends only t o “officer[s] or em ployee[s] of the United States or any agency ther eof . . . .” 28 U.S.C. § 1361. Therefore, jurisdict ion to compel the Superior Co urt to d ism iss pla int if

f’ s cr im ina l ca se i s al so lac kin g. Fo r th ese rea so ns , p eti tio ne r’s applicat ion for a writ of habeas corpus is d en ied . Asep arate O rde r of dis m iss al a cco m

panie s this Memorandum Opinion.

/ s / ELLEN SEG AL HUV ELLE United States DistrictJudge Date: Marc h 10, 2008
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-226 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Tuesday, December 22, 1998)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received three reports from its Advisory

Committee on Reactor Safeguards following the Committee’s meetings on December 3-5. The

reports provide comments on:

-- An interim report on proposed improvements to the NRC inspection and assessment

programs;

-- Proposed Commission paper concerning options for risk-informed revisions to 10 CFR Part

50 - “domestic licensing of production and utilization facilities;”

-- Options for incorporating risk insights into the 10 CFR 50.59 process, whereby licensees can

make certain changes to their facility and conduct tests and experiments without prior NRC

approval.

Copies of the reports are available through the NRC’s Office of Public Affairs, the NRC’s

Internet homepage (www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW) and the Public Document Room.

###