alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-018 March 19, 2002 

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC TO MEET WITH EXELON TO DISCUSS LIMERICK PLANT PERFORMANCE

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Exelon Generation

Company, LLC, on Tuesday, March 26, to discuss the results of the agencyís annual assessment of

safety performance at the Limerick Generating Station. The twin-reactor nuclear power plant is

located in Montgomery County, Pa., and is operated by Exelon.

 The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. at

the Limerick Energy Information Center, 298 Longview Road, Linfield, Pa. Before the session is

adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the public on the safety performance

of Limerick Units 1 and 2 and the role of the NRC in ensuring safe plant operation.

 The performance period to be discussed is April 1, 2001, to December 31, 2001. In addition,

NRC staff will provide an overview of the agencyís Reactor Oversight Process.

 A letter sent from the NRC Region I office to Exelon addresses plant performance during the

period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/lim_2001q4.pdf

 Current performance information for Limerick Unit 1 is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LIM1/lim1_chart.html

 Current performance information for Limerick Unit 2 is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LIM2/lim2_chart.html

###
### SUBCHAPTER II—EMPLOYEES
EXHIBIT 32
  Certification Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 This certification is not deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and does not constitute a part of the Annual Report of Hypercom Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”).
 
 In connection with the Report, we, Philippe Tartavull, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas B. Sabol, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, respectively, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated: December 1, 2010
By:
/s/ Philippe TartavullPhilippe TartavullChief Executive OfficerDated: December 1, 2010
By:
/s/ Thomas B. SabolThomas B. SabolChief Financial Officer
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-78 August 27, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

SPECIAL NRC TEAM TO EVALUATE PERFORMANCE

AT CLINTON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has established a

special evaluation team that will assess the performance of

Illinois Power Company at the Clinton nuclear power plant located

near Clinton, Illinois.

The NRC team will monitor the Illinois Power Company’s

evaluation of its performance by a team of outside consultants as

well as conduct an independent assessment of the utility’s

performance.

The 10-member NRC team is headed by Kenneth E. Perkins, Jr.,

director of the agency’s field office in Walnut Creek,

California. The team members have not had recent regulatory

responsibilities for the Clinton plant.

Areas to be examined are operations and training,

maintenance and testing, engineering design and technical

support, plant support and radiation protection, and management

and organization.

Findings of the NRC team will provide a basis for further

NRC actions, including the next semiannual review of nuclear

power plant performance by NRC managers in January.

The NRC team will observe the work of the utility assessment

at the Clinton site September 24-October 3. Its independent

onsite follow-up is scheduled for October 20-31. The team will

discuss its findings in a meeting which will be open to the

public, tentatively scheduled for early December. Written

reports of both the utility and NRC reviews will be available to

the public.

In January of this year, Illinois Power received a letter

from the NRC Executive Director for Operations (the chief NRC

staff executive) notifying it that the agency staff had

identified a declining performance trend at the Clinton plant.

The NRC staff retained this designation for Clinton in the June
review of nuclear plant performance.

NRC attributed this declining trend to inadequacies in

adherence to procedures and to weaknesses in engineering,

operations and the corrective action program. Between June and

August, the agency fined Illinois Power a total of $560,000 for

performance problems.

More recently, an NRC augmented inspection concluded that

safety-related electrical circuit breakers at the plant had

malfunctioned because of inadequate lubrication and preventive

maintenance. Clinton has been shut down since September of last

year.

Because of the declining performance trend, NRC senior staff

managers recommended to the Commission in June that either an NRC

diagnostic evaluation be performed at Clinton or that a similar

examination be done by the utility with NRC oversight. As a

result of these concerns, Illinois Power decided on the

independent safety assessment process using a team of outside

consultants.

####
Exhibit
23.1





HANSEN, BARNETT& MAXWELL,
      P.C.A
      Professional Corporation
              
              Registered
      with the Public CompanyCERTIFIED
      PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
              
              Accounting
      Oversight Board5
      Triad Center, Suite 750Salt
      Lake City, UT 84180-1128Phone:
      (801) 532-2200
                Fax:
      (801) 532-7944www.hbmcpas.com
              
              A
      Member of the Forum of Firms


CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated December 23,
2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of RemoteMDx, Inc.,
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of RemoteMDx,
Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September
30, 2008 in the following Registration Statements and related
prospectuses.
 
 RemoteMDx,
      Inc. Form S-8
              File
      No. 333-153184RemoteMDx,
      Inc. Form S-8
              File
      No. 333-146099
   
 
 HANSEN,
BARNETT & MAXWELL, P.C.
 
 Salt Lake
City, Utah
 December
23, 2008
### §5514. Green and Gold Congressional Aide Program

#### (a) Establishment

There is established in the House of Representatives the Green and Gold Congressional Aide Program (hereafter in this section referred to as the "Program") for veterans and Gold Star Families, under the direction of the Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives, under which an eligible individual may serve a 2-year fellowship in the office of a Member of the House of Representatives (including a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to the Congress) or House Officer.

#### (b) Placement

An individual may serve a fellowship under the Program at the Member's office in the District of Columbia or the Member's office in the congressional district the Member represents. Fellows assigned to House Officers may serve where assigned.

#### (c) Exclusion of appointees for purposes of limit on number of employees in Member offices

Any individual serving a fellowship under the Program in the office of a Member shall not be included in the determination of the number of employees employed by the Member under section 5321(a) of this title.

#### (d) Regulations

The Program shall be carried out in accordance with regulations promulgated by the Committee on House Administration.

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2022 and each succeeding fiscal year such sums as may be necessary to carry out the Program.

#### (f) Effective date

This section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2022 and each succeeding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 117–103, div. I, title I, §114, Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 511.)
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-017 March 15, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH NEW JERSEY COMPANY

TO DISCUSS SITE REMEDIATION PLANS

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will meet with representatives of Heritage Mineral,

Inc., on Tuesday, March 20, to discuss the status of cleanup plans at the Heritage Minerals site in

Lakehurst, N.J.

The meeting, which begins at 10:30 a.m., will be held in the public meeting room at the NRC

Region I office, 475 Allendale Road, in King of Prussia, Pa. It is open to the public for observation.

The site has been used for mining and processing local monazite ores to extract heavy minerals.

ASARCO, Inc., began operation at the site in 1973, followed by Heritage, which ceased processing

operations in August 1990. The processing of the ores resulted in a waste pile containing natural

thorium and uranium in sufficient quantities to require an NRC license. The company has begun

decommissioning the site and will discuss plans to complete the process.

###
### §64a–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 64a–1 was editorially reclassified as section 6536 of this title.
§ 402.4 Calls at restricted ports en route to an unrestricted port with restricted cargo. Order T-1 does not prohibit an American flag ship or aircraft from going to or calling at one of the restricted ports, even though it has on board a commodity which could not be discharged at that port. (Note, however, that Order T-2 prohibits American flag ships and aircraft from calling at any port or other place in Communist China.) For example, an American flag ship may call at one of the restricted ports (except one in Communist China), even though it has on board the following classes of commodities: ( a ) A Positive List commodity manifested to a destination outside the restricted area, with an export license and an export declaration showing the unrestricted destination at the ultimate destination,
( b ) a Positive List commodity destined for the restricted port of call which cannot be discharged there because there is no export license or authorization from the Assistant Secretary for Domestic and International Business permitting discharge at the restricted port of call,
( c ) a commodity of any kind destined for Communist China (the transportation and discharge of which is covered by Order T-2). None of these commodities may be discharged at the restricted port of call. Discharge of any of these commodities at the port covered by the restrictions of Order T-1 is prohibited and subject to penalty, regardless of the circumstances under which the discharge of the cargo at the restricted port occurs, unless appropriate authorization is obtained.
No: IV-23-006 June 30, 2023

CONTACT: Victor Dricks, 817-200-1128

NRC Names Leanne Flores Resident Inspector 

At South Texas Project Nuclear Power Plant

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Leanne 

Flores as the new resident inspector at the South Texas Project 

nuclear power plant in Bay City, Texas.

“Leanne brings strong technical expertise and experience to 

this important role. I am confident that she will excel at carrying out 

NRC’s inspection program to ensure that South Texas Project 

continues to operate safely,” said NRC Acting Region IV 

Administrator Rob Lewis.

Flores joined the NRC in April 2019 as a project engineer in the Resident Inspector 

Development Program in the Region IV office in Arlington, Texas. Most recently, she worked for 

the division of operating reactor safety as a reactor inspector. She has also served as the acting 

resident inspector at other nuclear power plants including Cooper Nuclear Station and Columbia 

Generating Station. 

Prior to that, Flores was a shift test engineer at the Norfolk Naval Shipyard for 10 years and 

worked as a project engineer for several years in the private sector. She holds a bachelor’s degree in 

chemical engineering from Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors. 

Flores will work with senior resident inspector Greg Kolcum. They serve as the agency’s eyes and 

ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring significant work projects, and interacting 

with plant workers and the public.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 99-01 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson January 11, 1999

OFFICE: 817-860-8128

PAGER: 888-876-2331

E-Mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH PG&E

TO DISCUSS DIABLO CANYON SAFETY CULTURE

Public Invited To Comment After The Meeting

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with PG&E officials Friday,

January 15 to discuss the results of a survey, conducted by an independent contractor,

of the safety culture at the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant. The public is invited

attend the meeting and to comment on the survey and related issues afterward.

The meeting will begin at 2 p.m. at the Embassy Suites Hotel, 333 Madonna Rd.,

San Luis Obispo. Public comments will be limited to five minutes each to allow all who

want to speak an opportunity to be heard. A sign up sheet will be available at the start

of the meeting.

PG&E, on its own initiative, commissioned the survey to gain unbiased insight

into the safety culture at Diablo Canyon. The NRC has a policy to encourage all

nuclear power plant operators to establish and maintain a safety-conscious work

environment and encourage employees to bring their safety concerns to the attention of

management for resolution.

###
1

Medina, Dayana

From: Galler, Wayne J. <WJGALLER@GAPAC.com>

Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 8:52 AM

To: Medina, Dayana

Cc: Cutbirth, James W.

Subject: Files for BART call Review

Attachments: SN19 6A Boiler Natural Gas 2001 2002 2003-WJG Revision 03-12-2013.xls; BART Five Factor Analysis 

Response 05-18-2012.pdf

Can you send these files and my notes below out to everyone on the call list, except for Jim Cutbirth and myself for our

call shortly?  Thanks.

I wanted to share a couple of documents in advance of our conference call.  The PDF file is a copy of a letter sent to

Mary Pettyjohn at ADEQ, dated May 18, 2012.  This memo explains that the two boilers at the Crossett Mill, 6A and 9A,

are both BART eligible units, and as a result, GP conducted CALPUFF modeling for the combined maximum daily

emissions of PM10, SO2, and NO2 from these units.  The results of the modeling indicate that there is no impact above

the screening level of 0.5 deciviews in any of the regional Class I areas near the Crossett Mill.  The highest impact was

0.36 deciviews at the Caney Creek National Wilderness Area in Arkansas.  As explained in the memo, the two boilers are

exempt from the BART five factor analysis requirements.  The emission rates modeled for the analysis are all less than

the Title V Permit limits contained in the latest revision issue dot the Mill in May 2012.

The attached spreadsheet summarizes the values subjected to the CALPUFF modeling for each boiler versus the

maximum pollutant emissions rates and compares these data to the R14 Title V permit limits.
**EXHIBIT13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the filing of the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report onForm 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended November 26, 2005 (the“Report”) by Novamerican Steel Inc. (the “Company”), the undersigned, as theChief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to my knowledge:

 

•       the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

•       the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ *D. Bryan Jones*            |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name: D. Bryan Jones            |
|   | Title: Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG RE: THE NEWSCORP LTD.



  
 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 
  
 We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-43799, 33-71446, 33-86358, 33-89584, 333-04962, 333-06324, 333-07466, 333-10338, 333-10624, 333-12878 and 333-51434-1 and Form F-3 Nos. 333-06896, 333-08246 and 333-13556)
of The News Corporation Limited and subsidiaries of our report dated August 14, 2002, except for Note 24, as to which the date is December 27, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The News Corporation Limited included in
this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended June 30, 2002. 
  
 /s/    Ernst & Young 
                                      
                                        
          
 Ernst & Young 
  

Sydney, Australia 
 December 27, 2002
§ 146.41 Privileged foreign status. ( a ) *General.* Foreign merchandise which has not been manipulated or manufactured so as to effect a change in tariff classification will be given status as privileged foreign merchandise on proper application to the port director.
( b ) *Application.* Each application for this status will be made on Customs Form 214 at the time of filing the application for admission of the merchandise into a zone or at any time thereafter before the merchandise has been manipulated or manufactured in the zone in a manner which has effected a change in tariff classification.
( c ) *Supporting documentation.* Each applicant for this status shall submit to the port director, with the application, an invoice notated as provided for in § 141.90 of this chapter.
( d ) *Determination of duties and taxes.* Upon receipt of the application and accompanying invoice, the port director may examine the merchandise to determine whether to approve the application. The merchandise will be subject to classification and valuation as provided in § 146.65.
( e ) *Status as privileged foreign merchandise binding.* A status as privileged foreign merchandise cannot be abandoned and remains applicable to the merchandise even if changed in form by manipulation or manufacture, except in the case of recoverable waste (see § 146.42(b)), as long as the merchandise remains within the purview of the Act. However, privileged foreign merchandise may be exported or withdrawn for supplies, equipment, or repair material of vessels or aircraft without the payment of taxes and duties, in accordance with §§ 146.67 and 146.69.
§ 190.106 Amount of drawback. ( a ) *Claim filed with TTB.* If the declaration required by § 190.103(a) shows that a claim has been or will be filed with TTB for domestic drawback, drawback under § 313(d) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(d)), will be limited to the difference between the amount of tax paid and the amount of domestic drawback claimed.
( b ) *Claim not filed with TTB.* If the declaration and statement required by § 190.103(a) and (b) show that no claim has been or will be filed by the manufacturer with TTB for domestic drawback, the drawback will be the full amount of the tax on the alcohol used. Drawback under this provision may not be granted absent receipt from TTB of a copy of TTB Form 5100.4 (Certificate of Tax-Paid Alcohol) indicating that taxes have been paid on the exported product for which drawback is claimed.
( c ) *No deduction of 1 percent.* No deduction of 1 percent may be made in drawback claims under § 313(d) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(d)).
( d ) *Payment.* The drawback due will be paid in accordance with § 190.81(f).
#### Elizabeth Hart, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Johnson, Deceased, Appellant, v. Frank A. Sileo and Sommers Motor Lines, Inc., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present— Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 4877]

      ( print page 62112)    
Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this matter, and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of State has concluded that there is a sufficient factual basis to find that the relevant circumstances described in section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189, hereinafter “INA”), exist with respect to Jemaah Islamiyah.

Therefore, effective October 22, 2004, the Secretary of State hereby redesignates that organization as a foreign terrorist organization pursuant to section 219(a) of the INA.

Dated: October 15, 2004.

William P. Pope,

Acting Coordinator for Counterterrorism, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 04-23592 Filed 10-21-04; 5:00 pm]

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P