alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Region II

101 Marietta Street, N.W.

Suite 2900

Atlanta, GA 30323

No: II-96-98 FOR IMMEDIATE

RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark (404) 331-5503 (Tuesday, November 26,

1996)

Roger Hannah (404) 331-7878

NRC STAFF ISSUES APPRAISAL OF PERFORMANCE

AT CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR POWER PLANT IN FLORIDA

Overall Performance Declines From Previous Assessment Period

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued a

Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) report for

Florida Power Corporation's Crystal River nuclear power plant,

located near Crystal River, Florida, which NRC officials say

indicates an overall decline in performance at the facility since

its previous assessment.

The NRC staff evaluated performance at Crystal River for a

period from September 17, 1995 through October 5 of this year and

found that performance in the functional areas of Operations and

Engineering declined from "good" to "acceptable" while performance

in the functional area of Plant Support declined from "superior" to

"good." Performance in the functional area of Maintenance was

sustained at a "good" level.

It was the second consecutive decline in assessment for

Engineering, which has seen its assessment over the last two SALP

periods drop twice, from "superior" to "good" to "acceptable".

Stewart D. Ebneter, Administrator of the NRC's Region II

office in Atlanta, said "common threads" running through the

assessment, which contributed to the performance decline, were weak

management oversight, ineffective self-assessment, insufficient

involvement in quality assurance, and an "insensitivity" to

regulatory requirements.

.

Operations addresses the control and execution of activities

directly related to operating the plant. Maintenance involves

activities in the areas of testing and maintaining plant

structures, systems and components. Engineering involves

activities associated with the design of plant modifications and

support for operations, maintenance, surveillance (testing) and

licensing activities. Plant Support addresses radiological
controls, radioactive effluents, chemistry emergency preparedness,

security, fire protection and housekeepiong controls.

The NRC staff assesses performance in these areas at all

commercial nuclear power plants in the United States on a periodic

basis as being in one of three categories. Category 1 is considered

superior. Category 2 is considered good, and Category 3 is

acceptable.

NRC officials will meet with company management at the plant

site at 12:30 p.m. on Monday, December 2, to discuss details of the

report. The meeting is open to observation by the public and the

press, and NRC officials will be available at its conclusion to

answer questions from interested observers.

#
Editorial Note on Part 174
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 174 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93025, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 174.30 Notice of denial of protest. ( a ) *Issuance of notice.* Notice of denial of a protest shall be mailed to any person filing a protest or his agent in all cases other than those in which accelerated disposition was requested and in which no action has been taken within 30 days after the date of mailing of the request. The notice shall include a statement of the reasons for the denial, as well as a statement informing the protesting party of the right to file a civil action contesting the denial of the protest under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1514). For purposes of section 515(a), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1515(a)), the date appearing on such notice shall be deemed the date on which such notice was mailed.
( b ) *Substitution of persons designated to receive notice.* The importer of record or consignee may give notice to CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically, instructing that notice of denial of any protest involving merchandise imported in his name or on his behalf shall be mailed to a person other than the person filing such protest or the designee of such person. Such notice of substitution shall be filed in quadruplicate and shall identify the protest by number and date of receipt. Notice of denial of a protest shall be mailed to the substituted person so designated only if the notice of substitution is received by the CBP prior to a denial by him of such protest.
( c ) *Notification of payment of increased duties.* The Center director shall note on the notice of denial of a protest the payment of all liquidated duties, charges, or exactions, if he has actual knowledge of such payment at the time that the protest is denied.
[T.D. 70-181, 35 FR 13429, Aug. 22, 1970, as amended by T.D. 80-271, 45 FR 75642, Nov. 17, 1980; CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93025, Dec. 20, 2016]
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.2009 Certification for goods exported to Panama. ( a ) *Submission of certification to CBP.* Any person who completes and issues a certification for a good exported from the United States to Panama must provide a copy of the certification (written or electronic) to CBP upon request.
( b ) *Notification of errors in certification.* Any person who completes and issues a certification for a good exported from the United States to Panama and who has reason to believe that the certification contains or is based on incorrect information must promptly notify every person to whom the certification was provided of any change that could affect the accuracy or validity of the certification. Notification of an incorrect certification must also be given either in writing or via an authorized electronic data interchange system to CBP specifying the correction (*see* §§ 10.2032 and 10.2033).
( c ) *Maintenance of records* — ( 1 ) *General.* Any person who completes and issues a certification for a good exported from the United States to Panama must maintain, for a period of at least five years after the date the certification was issued, all records and supporting documents relating to the origin of a good for which the certification was issued, including the certification or copies thereof and records and documents associated with: ( i ) The purchase, cost, and value of, and payment for, the good;
( ii ) The purchase, cost, and value of, and payment for, all materials, including indirect materials, used in the production of the good; and
( iii ) The production of the good in the form in which the good was exported.
( 2 ) *Method of maintenance.* The records referred to in paragraph (c)(1) of this section must be maintained as provided in § 163.5 of this chapter.
( 3 ) *Availability of records.* For purposes of determining compliance with the provisions of this part, the records required to be maintained under this section must be stored and made available for examination and inspection by the Center director or other appropriate CBP officer in the same manner as provided in part 163 of this chapter.
98°W

98°W

96°W

96°W

94°W

94°W

92°W

92°W

90°W

90°W

88°W

88°W

86°W

86°W

84°W

84°W

82°W

82°W

22°N 22°N

24°N 24°N

26°N 26°N

28°N 28°N

30°N 30°N

32°N 32°N

98°W

98°W

96°W

96°W

94°W

94°W

92°W

92°W

90°W

90°W

88°W

88°W

86°W

86°W

84°W

84°W

82°W

82°W

22°N 22°N

24°N 24°N

26°N 26°N

28°N 28°N

30°N 30°N

32°N 32°N

Note:

The Maritime boundaries and limits shown above

are for initial planning purposes only and do not

prejudice or affect United States jurisdiction in

any way.

TX

LA

MS AL GA

FL

FEDERAL OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF (OCS) ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES - GULF OF MEXICO REGION

New Administrative Boundaries

U.S. 200 NM Limit

Boundary Turning Points

GULF STATE OFFSHORE ADMINISTRATIVE

BOUNDARIES (PRELIMINARY)

LEGEND

February 1, 2006

Projection Geographic

North American Datum 1927

0 50 100 150 200 Statute Miles

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Kilometers

The Administrative boundaries shown on this

map have been computed with the Supreme

Court fixed baselines for Texas - Alabama and

the latest National Baseline for Florida (rounded

to 8 decimal places of a degree). The

precise coordinates are pending final review.
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.701 Scope.

This subpart implements the duty preference and related customs provisions applicable to imported goods under the United States-Jordan Free Trade Agreement (the US-JFTA) signed on October 24, 2000, and under the United States-Jordan Free Trade Area Implementation Act (the Act; 115 Stat. 243). Except as otherwise specified in this subpart, the procedures and other requirements set forth in this subpart are in addition to the customs procedures and requirements of general application contained elsewhere in this chapter. Additional provisions implementing certain aspects of the US-JFTA are contained in part 163 of this chapter.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 141](/current/title-19/part-141?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, [81 FR 93019](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/81-FR-93019), Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 141.85 Pro forma invoice.

A pro forma invoice submitted in accordance with any provision of this chapter shall be in substantially the following form:

# Pro Forma Invoice

# Importers Statement Of Value Or The Price Paid In The Form Of An Invoice

Not being in possession of a commercial seller's or shipper's invoice I request that you accept the statement of value or the price paid in the form of an invoice submitted below:

Name of shipper

address \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Name of seller

address \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_;.

Name of consignee

address \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.

Name of purchaser

address \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.

The merchandise (has) (has not) been purchased or agreed to be purchased by me.

The prices, or in the case of consigned goods the values, given below are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and are based upon: (Check basis with an “X”)

(a) The price paid or agreed to be paid (\_\_) as per order dated \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.

(b) Advices from exporter by letter (—) by cable (\_\_) dated \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.

(c) Comparative values of shipments previously received (\_\_) dated \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.

(d) Knowledge of the market in the country of exportation (\_\_) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.

(e) Knowledge of the market in the United States (if U.S. Value) (\_\_) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.

(f) Advice by CBP (\_\_) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.

(g) Other (\_\_) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.

| A—Case marks numbers | B—Manufacturer's item No. symbol or brand | C—Quantities and full description | D—Unit purchase price (currency) | E—Total purchase price (currency) | F—Unit foreign value | G—Total foreign value |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Check which of the charges below are, and which are not included in the prices listed in columns “D” and “E”: | | | | | | |

| Amount | Included | Not included |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Packing | | |
| Cartage | | |
| Inlandfreight | | |
| Wharfage and loading abroad | | |
| Lighterage | | |
| Ocean freight | | |
| U.S. duties | | |
| Other charges (identify by name and amount) | | |
| Total | | |

Country of origin \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.

If any other invoice is received, I will immediately file it with an authorized CBP official.

(Signature of person

making invoice)

(Title and firm name)

Date

[T.D. 73-175, [38 FR 17447](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/38-FR-17447), July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 85-39, [50 FR 9612](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/50-FR-9612), Mar. 11, 1985]
October 24, 1991

MEMORANDUM FOR: James M. Taylor

Executive Director for Operations

Harold R. Denton, Director

Office of Governmental and Public Affairs

FROM: Samuel J. Chilk, Secretary /S/

SUBJECT: SECY-91-311 - FINAL MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

WITH THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ON THE EMERGENCY

RESPONSE DATA SYSTEM

This is to advise you that the Commission has not objected to the proposed Memorandum of

Understanding (MOU) with the State of Michigan. The editorial change on the attachment

should be incorporated in the MOU.

Attachment:

As stated

cc: The Chairman

Commissioner Rogers

Commissioner Curtiss

Commissioner Remick

OGC

OIG

___________________
SECY NOTE: THIS SRM AND SECY-91-311 WILL BE MADE PUBLICLY AVAILABLE 10

WORKING DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS SRM
IF INTERESTED IN VIEWING THE ATTACHMENT, REFER TO THE SRM
Exhibit 99.8




graphicPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chartered Accountants

111 5 Avenue SW, Suite 3100

Calgary, Alberta

Canada T2P 5L3

Telephone +1 403 509 7500

Facsimile +1 403 781 1825

www.pwc.com/ca
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
 We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 of Provident Energy Trust of our report dated March 9, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the years then ended, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2010, which appears in this Annual Report.
 
 
 Chartered Accountants
 Calgary, Alberta
 March 24, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 “PricewaterhouseCoopers” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership, which is a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each member firm of which is a separate legal entity.
### §88b–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 88b–2 was editorially reclassified as section 4911 of this title.
# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

March 9 , 2015

ERRATA

______________________

Appeal No. 2014

- 1110

IN RE PAPST LICENSING DIGITAL CAMERA
PATENT LITIGATION

____________________________________________________

PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG,

v.

FUJIFILM CORPORATION, FUJIFILM NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION (formerly known as Fujifilm USA, Inc.), HEWLETT- PACKARD COMPANY, JVC COMPANY OF AMERICA, NIKON CORPORATION, NIKON, INC., OLYMPUS CORP., OLYMPUS IMAGING AMERICA INC., PANASONIC CORPORATION (formerly known as Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., LTD.), PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG
OPTO

- ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG

TECHWIN CO., VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, LTD.,

Decided: February 2, 2015
P recedential Opinion

_____________________P APST L ICENSING V

. F UJI F ILM C ORPORATION 2

P lease make the following change :

On page nine, first paragraph, replace the sentence

Second, it is undisputed that if we reject all five of the challenged constructions, the summary

- judgment orders
must be vacated. 2

with the following sentence:

Second, it is appropriate, if we reject all five of the challenged constructions, to vacate the summary

judgment orders and remand. 2

Footnote 2 re mains unchanged.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6830** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. BARKLEY GARDNER, a/k/a Big Black , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Malcolm J. Howard , Senior District Judge. ( 4:95

- cr - 00041

- H

- 8; 4:03

- cv - 00060

- H )

Submitted : July 25 , 2013 Decided: July 30, 2013

Before GREGORY , DAVIS , and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Barkley Gardner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Barkley Gardner seeks to appeal the district court’s

o rder denying his motion to reconsider the order denying his motion to amend his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2013 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (2 00 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonst rating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district cour t denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have indep endently reviewed the record and conclude that Gardner has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4519 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4519

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide a five-year extension 
  of the special survivor indemnity allowance provided to widows and 
  widowers of deceased members of the uniformed services affected by 
   required Survivor Benefit Plan annuity offset for dependency and 
  indemnity compensation received under section 1311(a) of title 38, 
                          United States Code.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 2016

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide a five-year extension 
  of the special survivor indemnity allowance provided to widows and 
  widowers of deceased members of the uniformed services affected by 
   required Survivor Benefit Plan annuity offset for dependency and 
  indemnity compensation received under section 1311(a) of title 38, 
                          United States Code.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION OF SPECIAL SURVIVOR INDEMNITY ALLOWANCE 
              FOR WIDOWS AND WIDOWERS OF DECEASED MEMBERS OF THE 
              UNIFORMED SERVICES AFFECTED BY REQUIRED SURVIVOR BENEFIT 
              PLAN ANNUITY OFFSET FOR DEPENDENCY AND INDEMNITY 
              COMPENSATION.

    Section 1450(m)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (H) by striking ``and'';
            (2) in subparagraph (I) by striking the period after 
        ``$310'' and inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
                    ``(J) for months during fiscal year 2018, $400;
                    ``(K) for months during fiscal year 2019, $475;
                    ``(L) for months during fiscal year 2020, $600;
                    ``(M) for months during fiscal year 2021, $700; and
                    ``(N) for months during fiscal year 2022, $800.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 15.2



[Levy Cohen and Co. Letterhead]



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



OF



Hermes Logistics Technologies Limited



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-156686) of our report dated February 8, 2013, included in this
annual report on Form 20-F of Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2012.



|/s/ Levy Cohen and Co. | 
|---------------------- | 
|LEVY COHEN AND CO.     | 
|Registered Auditors    | 



May 13, 2013

London, United Kingdom
#### § 171.31 Form of offers.

Offers in compromise submitted pursuant to the provisions of section 617 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1617) must expressly state that they are being submitted in accordance with the provisions of that section. The amount of the offer must be deposited with Customs in accordance with the provisions of § 161.5 of this chapter.
1:20-cv-22783-BB Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2022 Page 1 

•••••••• , •• ,& 
•w 

lAJaJ 

1:20-cv-22783-BB Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2022 Page 2 
1:20-cv-22783-BB Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2022 Page 3 
-.. ••••••••--••• Hi•••••••••••- / fl/ZJ~ ~ 

1:20-cv-22783-BB Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2022 Page 4 
1:20-cv-22783-BB Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2022 Page 5 
••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••• ~ 

1:20-cv-22783-BB Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2022 Page 6 
ID~ -~----------<----- ----

I 

1:20-cv-22783-BB Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2022 Page 7 
1:20-cv-22783-BB Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2022 Page 8 
r.;,· ••••••••• I ~ ~~ 

1:20-cv-22783-BB Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2022 Page 9 
1:20-cv-22783-BB Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2022 Page 1
•••••• •• • ••••••••••• • : r. ' I ' 

L)~ /2%1 ~ - I' / A - L,,, ./ -~~ 

au--/4 "-~ ~~-~ / . 

7 / ,<;' 

.,/ ____ 

, 

-A ~~ 

1:20-cv-22783-BB Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2022 Page 1
,,;,-•• ~ .......... 7•••• -~•-·

9•• •• 

) 

1:20-cv-22783-BB Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2022 Page 1
~,,.J.0 .,aQt?vO~V' Ot 4naJ ,:,v..>,t\.4 o/11'1 J<rt'.Jd 

,.,.c}"\m d\,+ \,I\.P~t ✓, , t~J4q":?-:> 1 i,,10 i~ 11 f""°Yr 5

V -;;JJ s - b . 

1:20-cv-22783-BB Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2022 Page 1
•• ~ • .W ••••••A.-.~.---...-.••••~ 

JLL__ o_w____:_ ____ ....:........!.-=----....::.....:...~~o~v'--l----==J--'-J-o~-=---~-h_~ ----'-f-c1-, __:_ ~+-'--c.. =-=u=---r-k-'--,n-....;J-1~ 

"-e 

? 

1:20-cv-22783-BB Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2022 Page 1
7 

D to 

r'C +(cf 

.3 

1:20-cv-22783-BB Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2022 Page 1
1:20-cv-22783-BB Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2022 Page 1
1:20-cv-22783-BB Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2022 Page 1
!••··· •• , ••• •f•~········ 

1:20-cv-22783-BB Document 192 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2022 Page 18
### §69. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 69 was editorially reclassified as section 4333 of this title.
<PAGE>
 
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23


                              Consent of KPMG LLP


The Board of Directors
Midas, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 
333-44625, 333-44797 and 333-58363 on Form S-8 of Midas, Inc. of our report 
dated February 10, 1999 relating to the balance sheets of Midas as of December 
1998 and 1997, and the related statements of operations, cash flows and changes 
in shareholders' equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended 
December 1998, which report is incorporated by reference in the 1998 annual 
report on Form 10-K of Midas, Inc.


                              /s/ KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 22, 1999