alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 12.105 Definitions. For purposes of §§ 12.106 through 12.109: ( a ) The term *pre-Columbian monumental or architectural sculpture or mural* means any stone carving or wall art listed in paragraph (b) of this section which is the product of a pre-Columbian Indian culture of Belize, Bolivia, Columbia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Peru, or Venezuela.
( b ) The term *stone carving or wall art* includes: ( 1 ) Such stone monuments as altars and altar bases, archways, ball court markers, basins, calendars, and calendrical markers, columns, monoliths, obelisks, statues, stelae, sarcophagi, thrones, zoomorphs;
( 2 ) Such architectural structures as aqueducts, ball courts, buildings, bridges, causeways, courts, doorways (including lintels and jambs), forts, observatories, plazas, platforms, facades, reservoirs, retaining walls, roadways, shrines, temples, tombs, walls, walkways, wells;
( 3 ) Architectural masks, decorated capstones, decorative beams of wood, frescoes, friezes, glyphs, graffiti, mosaics, moldings, or any other carving or decoration which had been part of or affixed to any monument or architectural structure, including cave paintings or designs;
( 4 ) Any fragment or part of any stone carving or wall art listed in the preceding subparagraphs.
( c ) The term *country of origin,* as applied to any pre-Columbian monumental or architectural sculpture or mural, means the country where the sculpture or mural was first discovered.
[T.D. 73-119, 38 FR 10807, May 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 73-151, 38 FR 14677, June 4, 1973; T.D. 73-165, 38 FR 16044, June 20, 1973; 42 FR 42684, Aug. 24, 1977; T.D. 82-145, 47 FR 35477, Aug. 16, 1982]
#### Delphine D. Sinden, Respondent, v. City of Oswego, Appellant. George H. Sinden, Plaintiff, v. City of Oswego, Defendant.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order grants plaintiff-respondent’s motion to correct a notice of claim in a negligence action.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Harris, McCum, Larkin and Love, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23535]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ASTM International-Intellectual Property Policy

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ASTM International--
Intellectual Property Policy (``ASTM-IPP'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of 
business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature 
and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: ASTM 
International--Intellectual Property Policy, west Conshohocken, PA. The 
nature and scope of ASTM-IPP's standards development activities are: 
ASTM International develops standrds in over 130 areas covering 
subjects including consumer products, medical services and devices, 
electronics, metals, paints, plastics, textiles, petroleum, 
construction, energy and the environment. ASTM International, as part 
of its standards development activities, has promulgated and adopted an 
Intellectual Property Policy as described in the Act (publicly 
available at http://www.astm.org/Itpolicy.pdf.
    For additional information, please contact: Thomas B. O'Brien, Jr., 
General Counsel, ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West 
Conshohocken, PA, telephone no. (610) 832-9597, e-mail address 
[email protected].

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23535 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10

         Amendment No. 4 to Employment Agreement dated as of August 1, 2000 (the
"Agreement"), as amended, between Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (the
"Employer" or the "Company") and Ryan A. Brant ("Employee").

         WHEREAS, the Company and Employee desire to amend the terms of the
Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises, the Company
and Employee hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

         1. Section I of the Agreement is amended to extend the Initial Term
until July 31, 2007.

         2. Section III A. is amended to substitute $750,000 for $600,000 (de
facto $725,000) and shall provide for an annual cost of living increase of
12.5%.

         3. Section III B. is amended to read as follows:

         "Employee shall be paid a bonus of $150,000 in respect of each fiscal
quarter, commencing with the fiscal quarter ending January 31, 2003, and an
annual bonus of $250,000 in respect of each fiscal year; provided that (i) the
Compensation Committee of the Board approves any such bonus, and (ii) Employer
achieves its projected cash flow and net income targets submitted to the Board
for any such fiscal quarter or fiscal year. Employer's cash flow targets shall
be determined in accordance with Employer's operating cash flow (including all
capital expenditures other than fixed assets) presented in its quarterly and
annual reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Employee shall
also be paid a signing bonus of $600,000 simultaneously with the execution
hereof."


         All other terms and provisions of the Agreement remain unchanged in
full force and effect.



Dated:  November 18, 2002                   TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC.



                                        By:/s/ Karl H. Winters
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Name:      Karl H. Winters
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer



                                        /s/Ryan A. Brant
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Ryan A. Brant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0502

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ROGER MICHAEL KEECH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 12, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 2 2024

07/02/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0502
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 655 

To amend the Natural Gas Act to provide that the United States district 

courts shall not have jurisdiction to condemn property in which a State 

holds any interest, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10, 2021 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Natural Gas Act to provide that the United 

States district courts shall not have jurisdiction to condemn property in which a State holds any interest, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ending Natural Gas 

5 Companies’ Seizure of Land for Export Profits Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 655 IS

1 SEC. 2. JURISDICTION OF UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

2 COURTS OVER CERTAIN EMINENT DOMAIN 

3 PROCEEDINGS. 

4 Section 7(h) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 

5 717f(h)) is amended— 

6 (1) in the second sentence— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘situated: Provided, That 

8 the’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘situated. 

9 ‘‘(3) JURISDICTION OF UNITED STATES DIS10 TRICT COURTS.— 

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The’’; and 

12 (B) by striking ‘‘The practice’’ and insert13 ing the following: 

14 ‘‘(2) PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE.—The prac15 tice’’; 

16 (2) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘(h) When 

17 any holder’’ and inserting the following: 

18 ‘‘(h) EMINENT DOMAIN.— 

19 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—When any holder’’; and 

20 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

21 ‘‘(B) STATE PROPERTY.—The United 

22 States district courts shall not have jurisdiction 

23 to condemn property in which a State owns any 

24 interest.’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 655 IS

1 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF EMINENT DOMAIN 

2 FOR EXPORTS. 

3 Section 7(h) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 

4 717f(h)) (as amended by section 2) is amended by adding 

5 at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(4) LIMITATION ON USE OF EMINENT DOMAIN

7 FOR EXPORTS.—A holder of a certificate of public 

8 convenience and necessity may not exercise the right 

9 of eminent domain under this subsection if the 

10 project covered by the certificate is a project to be 

11 constructed substantially for the purpose of trans12 porting natural gas to an LNG terminal or to other 

13 pipelines for export from the United States to a for14 eign country.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual report fy...**
 
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc:ID 1.27:B 63/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000637969
 
November 1, 2017
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.597 Accumulation. ( a ) Originating materials from the territory of one or more of the Parties that are used in the production of a good in the territory of another Party will be considered to originate in the territory of that other Party.
( b ) A good that is produced in the territory of one or more of the Parties by one or more producers is an originating good if the good satisfies the requirements of § 10.594 of this subpart and all other applicable requirements of General Note 29, HTSUS.
#### Kenmore Estates, Inc., Appellant, v. Montrose Industrial Bank, Respondent.

Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
Docket No: FAA-2015-3988 Dir ID: 2015-NM-005-AD

. Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Transport Canada Robert Farinas

(613) 952-4357

12/19/14 No Objections

Bombardier 

Aerospace

Mher Krikorian

(514) 855-5001

X 56298

12/19/14 No Objections
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

RealNetworks, Inc.: 

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-114088) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-63333, 333-128444 and 333-147279) on Form S-8 of RealNetworks, Inc. of our reports dated March 15, 2011, with respect to the consolidatedbalance sheets of RealNetworks, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity and noncontrolling interest, and cash flows for each of theyears in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which reports appear in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K ofRealNetworks, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

March 15, 2011
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Giuseppe Masseria, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### **CHAPTER 13—CONTROL OF COAL-MINE FIRES**

Sec.
551.
Declaration of policy.
552.
Definitions.
553.
Duties of Secretary; surveys, research, etc.; projects.
554.
Lands subject to chapter.
555.
Conditions precedent for aid to non-Federal lands.
556.
Administration.
557.
Rules and regulations.
558.
Authorization of appropriations.
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-00-68 November 28, 2000

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH GLOBAL NUCLEAR FUEL

TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATION OF NRC REQUIREMENTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Global Nuclear

Fuel (formerly GE Nuclear Energy), of Wilmington, North Carolina, on Tuesday, December 12, to

discuss an apparent violation of NRC requirements related to the company’s failure to control licensed

plutonium calibration check sources.

The meeting, scheduled for 1:00 p.m. (EST), will be held in the NRC offices located on the 24th

floor of the Sam Nunn Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia. It will be open to

observation by interested members of the public and news media representatives. NRC officials will

be available at its conclusion to answer questions.

In August of this year, Global Nuclear reported to the NRC that two sets of licensed sources

had been recorded as having been received at the facility, but could not be located. The package

containing the sources, a total of eight metal disks electroplated with plutonium-239, was not required

to be labeled because of the low levels of radioactivity. The company conducted an unsuccessful

search of its site and contacted the delivery company, which was also unable to find the sources.

Global Nuclear has revised its receiving procedures to verify incoming package contents and

also to immediately place received licensed radioactive material in an approved storage location.

Global Nuclear requested the conference to discuss the apparent violation, its cause and safety

significance; to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and to

outline its proposed corrective actions.

The NRC has tentatively decided not to fine Global Nuclear because the company identified the

event, has not had any recent escalated enforcement actions and has described preliminary corrective

actions it has taken. However, no decision on the apparent violation will be made at this conference.

That decision will be made by senior NRC officials at a later time.

###
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23766]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on July 13, 
2004, National Center for Natural Products Research--NIDA MProject, 
University of Mississippi, 135 Coy Waller Complex, University, 
Mississippi 38677, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marihuana (7360)...........................................            I
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)...............................            I
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to cultivate marihuana for the National Institute 
of Drug Abuse for research approved by the Department of Health and 
Human Services.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such a substance may file comments or 
objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 
CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCD) and must be filed no later than December 27, 2004.

    Dated: October 18, 2004.
William J. Walker,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-23766 Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
§ 18.5 Diversion. ( a ) *Procedure.* In order to change the port of destination or the port of exportation of an in-bond movement, the filer of the in-bond application must submit a request to divert merchandise via a CBP-approved EDI system. Permission for the diversion and movement of merchandise will be transmitted via a CBP-approved EDI system. If the request to divert merchandise is denied, such merchandise must be delivered to the original port of destination or port of exportation that was named in the in-bond application. The decision to grant or deny permission to divert merchandise is within the discretion of CBP. Denials may result from, for example, restrictions placed upon the movement of goods by government agencies.
( b ) *In-transit time.* The approval of a request to divert merchandise for transportation in-bond does not extend the in-transit time specified in § 18.1(i)(1) of this part. The diverted merchandise must be delivered to the port of diversion within the in-transit time specified in § 18.1(i)(1) from the date CBP first authorized the in-bond movement, unless an extension is granted pursuant to § 18.1(i)(2).
( c ) *Diversion of cargo subject to restriction, prohibition or regulation by other federal agency or authority.* Merchandise subject to a law, regulation, rule, standard or ban that requires permission or authorization by another federal agency or authority before importation may be restricted from being diverted on behalf of the authorizing agency.
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 20-F of Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. (the Company) for the period
ending December 31, 2003 (the Report), I, Dan Goldstein, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    
          the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    
          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

Date: June 30, 2004

|/s/ Dan Goldstein
Dan Goldstein
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 



---

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-cv-23223-BLOOM/Louis

DRAGAN JANICIJEVIC, on his own 

behalf and on behalf of all other similarly 

situated crewmembers working aboard 

BAHAMAS PARADISE CRUISE 

LINE vessels,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CLASSICA CRUISE OPERATOR, LTD., 

PARADISE CRUISE LINE 

OPERATOR LTD. INC. a/k/a PARADISE 

CRUISE LINE OPERATOR LTD. d/b/a 

BAHAMAS PARADISE CRUISE LINE, 

BPCL MANAGEMENT, LLC d/b/a 

BAHAMAS PARADISE CRUISE LINE, LLC,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

ORDER RESETTING MOTION HEARING

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Change of 

Scheduled Hearing Time, ECF No. [24] (“Motion”), filed on October 26, 2020, which requests 

that this Court reset the hearing currently scheduled for 11:00 a.m. on November 5, 2020, to 3:30 

p.m. on the same day.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion, ECF No. [24], is 

GRANTED. The time of the Zoom hearing on the pending Motion, ECF No. [21], that is currently 

set for November 5, 2020, at 11:00 a.m. is RESET to 3:30 p.m. on November 5, 2020. The 

Courtroom Deputy will provide instructions on the Zoom videoconferencing. 

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 20-cv-23223-BLOOM/Louis

2

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on October 26, 2020.

_________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: 

Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-23223-BB Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2020 Page 2 of 2
### §4316. Allowances for compensation of interns in House committee offices

#### (a) Establishment of allowances

There are established for the House of Representatives the following allowances:

(1) An allowance which shall be available for the compensation of interns who serve in offices of a standing, special, or select committee of the House (other than the Committee on Appropriations).

(2) An allowance which shall be available for the compensation of interns who serve in offices of the Committee on Appropriations.

#### (b) Benefit exclusion

Section 5321(b) of this title shall apply with respect to an intern who is compensated under an allowance under this section in the same manner as such section applies with respect to an intern who is compensated under the Members' Representational Allowance.

#### (c) Definitions

In this section, the term "intern", with respect to a committee of the House, has the meaning given such term with respect to a Member of the House of Representatives in section 5321(c)(2) of this title.

#### (d) Omitted

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2022 and each succeeding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 117–103, div. I, title I, §113, Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 510.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 113 of div. I of Pub. L. 117–103. Subsec. (d) of section 113 of div. I of Pub. L. 117–103 amended section 5507 of this title.
#### § 208.60 Determination of claims.

When DHS receives a reviewable claim for reimbursement, DHS will review the claim to determine whether and to what extent reimbursement is allowable. Except as provided in § 208.63 of this part, DHS will complete its review and give written notice to the Sponsoring Agency of its determination within 90 days after the date DHS receives the claim. If DHS determines that any item of cost is not eligible for reimbursement, its notice of determination will specify the grounds on which DHS disallowed reimbursement.