alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
November 1, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I W. Kerry Jackson, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|1. |  | The Report fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

|Date:December 11, 2008 | By:/s/ W. Kerry
      Jackson     
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                       | W. Kerry Jackson                  
|                       | Executive Vice President
      and
|                       | Chief Financial
      Officer     

---
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Phone: 610/337-5330 Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-103 August 11, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan

NRC, PSE&G TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS AT HOPE CREEK

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

officials of Public Service Electric and Gas Company (PSE&G) of

New Jersey on Tuesday, August 12, to discuss an apparent

violation of NRC requirements at the Hope Creek Generating

Station in Hancocks Bridge, NJ. The predecisional enforcement

conference, which is open to the public for observation, will be

held in the NRC’s Region I office, 475 Allendale Road, in King of

Prussia, Pa., beginning at 10 a.m.

NRC inspectors found the apparent violation during a routine

NRC inspection at Hope Creek in February and March. NRC

requirements allow a licensee to make changes to a facility

without Commission approval, unless the proposed changes involve

an unreviewed safety question. At Hope Creek, PSE&G changed the

design of the low pressure safety injection system, creating the

possibility of an accident of a different type than evaluated in

the final safety analysis report.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference

does not mean that the NRC has determined that a violation has

occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather, the

purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and

safety significance; to provide the licensee an opportunity to

point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC

inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline its

proposed corrective actions.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at this

conference. Those decisions will be made by senior NRC officials

at a later time.

#
Editorial Note on Part 181
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 181 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93026, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 181.95 Oral discussion of issues. ( a ) *General.* A person submitting a request for an advance ruling and desiring an opportunity to orally discuss the issue or issues involved should indicate that desire in writing at the time the advance ruling request is filed. Such a discussion will only be scheduled when, in the opinion of the Customs personnel by whom the advance ruling request is under consideration, a conference will be helpful in deciding the issue or issues involved or when a determination or conclusion contrary to that advocated in the advance ruling request is contemplated. Conferences are scheduled for the purpose of affording the parties an opportunity to freely and openly discuss the matters set forth in the advance ruling request. Accordingly, the parties will not be bound by any argument or position advocated or agreed to, expressly or by implication, during the conference unless either party subsequently agrees to be so bound in writing. The conference will not conclude with the issuance of an advance ruling letter.
( b ) *Time, place and number of conferences.* If a request for a conference is granted, the person making the request will be notified of the time and place of the conference. No more than one conference with respect to the matters set forth in an advance ruling request will be scheduled, unless, in the opinion of the Customs personnel by whom the advance ruling request is under consideration, additional conferences are necessary.
( c ) *Representation.* A person whose request for a conference has been granted may be accompanied at that conference by counsel or other representatives, or may designate such persons to attend the conference in his or her place.
( d ) *Additional information presented at conferences.* It will be the responsibility of the person submitting the request for an advance ruling to provide for inclusion in the Customs file in the matter a written record setting forth any and all additional information, documents, and exhibits introduced during the conference to the extent that person considers such material relevant to the consideration of the advance ruling request. Such information, documents and exhibits shall be given consideration only if received by Customs within 30 calendar days following the conference.
###### Editorial Note on Part 152

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 152 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93022, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 152.25 Conversion of foreign currency.

When foreign currency must be converted for purposes of appraisement, the instructions in subpart C of part 159 of this chapter shall be followed.
#### § 190.84 Protests.

Procedures to protest the denial, in whole or in part, of a drawback entry must be in accordance with part 174 of this chapter (19 CFR part 174).
### §78. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 78 was editorially reclassified as section 5604 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Law Enforcement Authority of Sergeant at Arms

Pub. L. 104–53, title III, §313, Nov. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 538, which related to the law enforcement authority of the Sergeant at Arms, was editorially reclassified as section 5605 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 19, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23328]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1560-DR]


Georgia; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Georgia (FEMA-1560-DR), dated September 24, 2004, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: October 8, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Georgia is hereby amended to include the following 
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 24, 2004:

    The county of Pierce for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-23328 Filed 10-18-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
FPL Port Everglades Energy Center - Responses to GHG Permit Application 

Comments

Flajole, Andy to: Gregg Worley 05/13/2012 10:01 AM

Cc:

Andrew Parks, "jessica.dalton@dep.state.fl.us", 

"david.bernhart@noaa.gov", Heather Ceron, 

"jeff.koerner@dep.state.fl.us" , "winston_hobgood@fws.gov"

History: This message has been replied to.

Hi Gregg,

Please find attached an electronic copy of FPL's responses to EPA Region IV's comments on the Port 

Everglades Energy Center greenhouse gas air permit application. FPL looks forward to working with you, 

your staff, and the other agencies involved in this permitting effort.

A hard copy is scheduled for delivery to your attention tomorrow (Monday, May 14th). Everyone on the 

cc list is being copied via this email only.

If anyone has questions please contact me at Andy.Flajole@FPL.com or (561) 691-2766. 

Thank you,

Andy Flajole

Juno Environmental Services

Office (561) 691-2766

FPL Port Everglades Everglades Energy Center- Center- GHG Permit Application Application Responses Responses to EPA Comments.pd Comments.pdf
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93021, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 151.6 Place of examination.

All merchandise will be examined at the place of arrival, unless examination at another place is required or authorized by the port director in accordance with § 151.7 or § 151.15 of this part. Except where the merchandise is required by the port director to be examined at the public stores, the importer shall bear any expense involved in preparing the merchandise for Customs examination and in the closing of packages.

[T.D. 84-152, 49 FR 29374, July 20, 1984, as amended by T.D. 93-6, 58 FR 5606, Jan. 22, 1993]
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-014 February 14, 2001

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING ON NUCLEAR RESEARCH

IN WASHINGTON, D.C. , ON FEBRUARY 21

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has scheduled a fourth and final public meeting to

further discuss the role and direction of nuclear regulatory research on February 21 in Washington,

D.C. Participants in the session will include government officials, members of the general public,

industry representatives and experts from academia.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held at the Center for Strategic and

International Studies, located at 1800 K Street, NW, in Washington, D.C. The center is located one

block west of the Farragut North Metro Station on the Red Line and one block north of the Farragut

West Metro Station on the Orange and Blue lines. The session will start at 9:15 a.m. and is expected

to end by 5 p.m.

As a result of the first two public meetings, the panel of nuclear experts issued a draft report

containing individual views on the role and direction of regulatory research. The draft report also

contained several recommendations. The third session focused on strategies for implementing the

recommendations as well as briefings by NRC licensing and regional offices. The final meeting will

review, discuss and propose individual recommendations for Commission consideration. Members of

the expert panel also will discuss their perspectives and responses to inquiries from NRC Chairman

Richard A. Meserve.

Those who seek additional information or agenda updates on the meeting should contact Jim

Johnson, at 301-415-6293; fax 301-415-5153; e-mail, jwj@nrc.gov . Seating for the meeting is

limited and will be on a first-come, first-served basis.

###
### §586. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–206, §6, Dec. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 738, which related to distribution of funds to members of the Northwestern Band of Shoshone Indians, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §4574. Limit on rate of compensation of Senate officers and employees

No officer or employee of the Senate shall receive pay for any services performed by him at any rate higher than that provided for the office or employment to which he has been regularly appointed.

(Aug. 5, 1882, ch. 390, §1, 22 Stat. 270.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 61 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
### subpart 3—board provisions
Editorial Note on Part 141
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 141.20 Actual owner's declaration and superseding bond of actual owner. ( a ) *Filing* — ( 1 ) *Declaration of owner.* A consignee in whose name an entry summary for consumption, warehouse, or temporary importation under bond is filed, or in whose name a rewarehouse entry or a manufacturing warehouse entry is made, and who desires, under the provisions of section 485(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1485(d)), to be relieved from statutory liability for the payment of increased and additional duties shall declare at the time of the filing of the entry summary or entry documentation, as provided in § 141.19(a), that he is not the actual owner of the merchandise, furnish the name and address of the owner, and file with CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically within 90 days from the time of entry (see § 141.68) a declaration of the actual owner of the merchandise acknowledging that the actual owner will pay all additional and increased duties. The declaration of owner shall be filed on Customs Form 3347.
( 2 ) *Bond of actual owner.* If the consignee desires to be relieved from contractual liability for the payment of increased and additional duties voluntarily assumed by him under the single-entry bond which he filed in connection with the entry documentation and/or entry summary, or under his continuous bond against which the entry and/or entry summary is charged, he shall file a bond of the actual owner on Customs Form 301, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.62 of this chapter, with CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically within 90 days from the time of entry.
( b ) *Appropriate party to execute and file.* Neither the declaration of the actual owner nor the bond of the actual owner shall be accepted unless executed by the actual owner or his duly authorized agent, and filed by the nominal consignee or his duly authorized agent.
( c ) *Nonresident actual owner.* If the actual owner is a nonresident, the actual owner's declaration shall not be accepted as compliance with section 485(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1485(d)), unless there is filed therewith the owner's bond on Customs Form 301, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.62 of this chapter, with a resident corporate surety.
( d ) *Filing of declaration of owner for purposes other than relief from liability.* Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the nominal consignee from filing the actual owner's declaration without the superseding bond for purposes other than relief from statutory liability for the payment of increased and additional duties under the provisions of section 485(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1485(d)).
[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17447, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 74-212, 39 FR 28420, Aug. 7, 1974; T.D. 79-221, 44 FR 46816, Aug. 9, 1979; T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41184, Oct. 19, 1984]
### §74d–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 74d–1 was editorially reclassified as section 5622 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 142

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 142.27 Failure to file documentation timely.

If the applicable Customs documentation set forth in § 142.22(b) is not filed within the time provided in § 142.23, the port director shall make an immediate demand for liquidated damages in the amount of the bond in the case of a single entry bond. When the transaction has been charged against a continuous bond, the demand shall be for the amount that would have been demanded if the merchandise had been released under a single entry bond. Any application for cancellation of liquidated damages incurred shall be made in accordance with part 172 of this chapter.

(R.S. 251, as amended, secs. 623, as amended, 624, 46 Stat. 759, as amended (19 U.S.C. 66, 1623, 1624))

[T.D. 79-221, 44 FR 46821, Aug. 9, 1979, as amended by T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41185, Oct. 19, 1984]
§ 148.65 Exemption for resident crewmembers. ( a ) *Status as returning resident.* A crewmember arriving in a vessel, vehicle, or aircraft from a foreign port who is a resident of the United States shall be considered a returning resident qualifying for the exemptions allowed under Chapter 98, Subchapter IV, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202), and subpart D of this part if he permanently leaves the carrier without the intention of resuming his employment on the same or any other carrier that is engaged in international traffic.
( b ) *Statement of declaration.* A resident crewmember who claims that articles declared by him are entitled to be passed free of duty and tax under the returning resident's exemption, shall include a legible statement on the declaration, Customs Form 5129, of the basis for his claim for entitlement to the resident's exemption.
[T.D. 81-218, 46 FR 42657, Aug. 24, 1981, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51265, Dec. 21, 1988]
#### Eva Turgell, as Administratrix of the Estate of Julius Turgell, Deceased, Appellant, v. Abraham Morris et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1354 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1354

  To amend section 19 of title 3, United States Code, to include the 
 Secretary of Homeland Security on the list of presidential successors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2003

  Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend section 19 of title 3, United States Code, to include the 
 Secretary of Homeland Security on the list of presidential successors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Presidential Vacancy Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. AMENDING THE LIST OF PRESIDENTIAL SUCCESSORS.

    Section 19(d)(1) of title 3, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``Secretary of Homeland Security'' after ``Attorney 
General,''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 165.12 Receipt of allegations. ( a ) *Date of receipt.* The “date of receipt” of a properly filed allegation is the date on which CBP provides an acknowledgment of receipt of an allegation containing all the information and certifications required in § 165.11, together with a CBP-assigned control number, to the party that filed the allegation. CBP has 15 business days from the date of receipt to determine whether to initiate an investigation under the EAPA.
( b ) *Withdrawal.* An allegation may be withdrawn by the party that filed it if that party submits a request to withdraw the allegation to the designated email address specified by CBP or through any other method approved or designated by CBP.
[81 FR 56482, Aug. 22, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 19259, Mar. 18, 2024]
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


                    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


To the Board of Directors
of SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.:

We  have  examined  management's  assertion  about  SUNTRUST  MORTGAGE,   INC.'S
compliance  with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE
BANKS ("USAP") and that the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and
omissions policy in the amounts of $100,000,000  and $20,000,000,  respectively,
as of and for the year ended  December  31, 1997,  included in the  accompanying
management  assertion.  Management is responsible  for the Company's  compliance
with those minimum  servicing  standards and for maintaining a fidelity bond and
errors and  omissions  policy.  Our  responsibility  is to express an opinion on
management's  assertion about the entity's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards and  maintenance  of a fidelity  bond and errors and omissions  policy
based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that the  Company  complied  with the
aforementioned  minimum servicing standards and that the Company had in effect a
fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amounts of $100,000,000 and
$20,000,000,  respectively,  as of and for the year ended  December  31, 1997 is
fairly stated in all material respects.


/S/Arthur Andersen LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
January 30,1998
453 P.2d 597

#### George WISEHART, Plaintiff-Appellant, Respondent, v. MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY and Kit Carson Electric Co-Op., Defendants-Appellees, Petitioners.

No. 8833.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

April 30, 1969.

Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 265, 80 N.M. 251, 453 P.2d 771 be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
###### Editorial Note on Part 141

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 141.12 Right to make entry of importations by other than common carrier.

When merchandise is not imported by a common carrier, possession of the merchandise at the time of arrival in the United States shall be deemed sufficient evidence of the right to make entry.
### §3741. Regulations

Except as otherwise provided by this chapter, the Secretary shall promulgate final regulations for the implementation of this chapter within 24 months after December 3, 1993. All regulations promulgated pursuant to this chapter shall be developed by the Secretary with the participation of the affected Indian tribes.

(Pub. L. 103–177, title III, §301, Dec. 3, 1993, 107 Stat. 2022.)
#### Snowden E. Lea v. Sarah A. Lea.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.