alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  |
|--|

|  |  |
|--|--|

| ** ** |
|------------|

|   | ****The Hindenburg Disaster**** 
337 pages

The FBI conducted limited investigation into facts surrounding the destruction of the zeppelin Hindenburg in 1937.

**Part 01****Part 02****Part 03****Part 04**

Introduction
Reading Room Index - A   B   C   D   E    F   G- H   I    J    K   L   M   N   -O   P   Q   R   S   T   U-V   W   X   Y   Z   
Electronic Reading Room
- Alphabetical Listing- Espionage-Famous Persons-Gangster Era- Historical Interest- Unusual Phenomena-Violent CrimeFBI              File Fact Sheet FOIA Request Instructions- FOIA Request Form - Privacy Waiver and Certificate of Identity Form Privacy Act Instructions- Privacy Act Request FormDOJ              Reference GuideU.S.              DOJ FOIASearch
All of these publications are in PDF (Portable Document Format). To view them you will need to have the Adobe Acrobat Reader plug-in installed on your computer. The Reader can be downloaded at no cost from Adobe's site on the World Wide Web.   If you have difficulty accessing any material on this site because of a disability, please contact us in writing or via telephone and we will work with you to make the information available.

Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Section    202-324-5520 |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          11,519
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,445
<ALLOWANCES>                                       338
<INVENTORY>                                      2,612
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,037
<PP&E>                                          14,044
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,676
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,848
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            86
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,688
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,676
<SALES>                                         21,342
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,342
<CGS>                                            8,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,148
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 151
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,939)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,939)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,939)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1

OMNI Energy Services Corps Subsidiaries

OMNI Energy Services Corp.

Trussco, Inc.

Trussco Properties, L.L.C.

American Helicopters Inc.

1OMNI Energy Seismic Services Corp.

OMNI Energy Seismic Services, L.L.C.

OMNI Aviation Corp.

OMNI Labor Corporation

OMNI Properties Corp.

OMNI
Energy Services Corp.  Mexico

OMNI Energy Transportation Corp.

Preheat, Inc.

Rig Tools, Inc.

BMJ Industrial Investments, L.L.C.

Charles
Holston, Inc. (wholly-owned subsidiary of BMJ Industrial Investments, L.L.C.)

2B.E.G. Liquid Mud Services, Corp.

OMNI Energia Mexicana

OMNI International Energy Services

American Aviation L.L.C.

OMNI Energy
Services  Alaska, Inc.

Hamilton Drill Tech, Inc.

Gulf Coast Resources, Inc.



|1 | Dissolved December 2007
|- | -----------------------



|2 | Acquired in January 2008
|- | ------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________ 

)

ALAN COLTER, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 09-0406 (ESH)

)

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. For the reasons

set forth below, the Court will dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction.

Petitioner, who is proceeding pro se, was indicted in the Superior Court of the District of

Columbia and is currently being held in the District’s Correctional Treatment Facility while he

awaits trial. He raises a number of challenges to his detention and to the proceedings in that

court, including lack of probable cause, illegal arrest and search and seizure of his property in

violation of the Fourth Amendment, reliance on invalid arrest warrants based on falsified police

statements, bias and abuse of discretion by Superior Court judges, prosecutorial misconduct,

insufficient evidence, violation of his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel

and denial of due process.

In effect, petitioner is seeking review of an ongoing criminal proceeding in Superior

Court. This Court, however, lacks subject matter jurisdiction to review the actions or rulings of

other courts. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332 (general jurisdictional provisions); Fleming v. United
2

States, 847 F. Supp. 170, 172 (D.D.C. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1150 (1995). Moreover, the

Court’s mandamus authority extends only to “officer[s] or employee[s] of the United States or

any agency thereof . . . .” 28 U.S.C. § 1361. Therefore, jurisdiction to compel the Superior

Court to dismiss plaintiff’s criminal case is also lacking. For these reasons, petitioner’s

application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies

this Memorandum Opinion.

 /s/ 

ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE

United States District Judge

Date: March 10, 2008
### §176. Mass Book Deacidification Facility; operation by Librarian of Congress

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Librarian of Congress shall equip, furnish, operate, and maintain the Library of Congress Mass Book Deacidification Facility.

(Pub. L. 98–427, §2, Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1656.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Authorization To Construct Facility

Pub. L. 98–427, §1, Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1656, provided: "That the Librarian of Congress is authorized and directed, subject to the supervision and construction authority of a Federal civilian or military agency, to construct the Library of Congress Mass Book Deacidification Facility in accordance with the general design developed by the Library of Congress and reviewed by the Architect of the Capitol, as set forth in the document entitled 'Library of Congress Mass Book Deacidification Facility, Engineering, Design, and Cost Estimate and Drawings', dated December 1983. Such facility shall be constructed on Federal property within seventy-five miles of the United States Capitol Building."

#### Authorization of Appropriation

Pub. L. 98–427, §3, Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1656, provided that: "There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1983, sums not to exceed $11,500,000 to carry out the provisions of this Act [enacting this section and a provision set out as a note under this section]."
§ 65.2 Definitions. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this part, the definitions set forth in part 59 of this subchapter are applicable to this part.
( b ) For the purpose of this part, a certification by a registered professional engineer or other party does not constitute a warranty or guarantee of performance, expressed or implied. Certification of data is a statement that the data is accurate to the best of the certifier's knowledge. Certification of analyses is a statement that the analyses have been performed correctly and in accordance with sound engineering practices. Certification of structural works is a statement that the works are designed in accordance with sound engineering practices to provide protection from the base flood. Certification of “as built” conditions is a statement that the structure(s) has been built according to the plans being certified, is in place, and is fully functioning.
( c ) For the purposes of this part, “reasonably safe from flooding” means base flood waters will not inundate the land or damage structures to be removed from the SFHA and that any subsurface waters related to the base flood will not damage existing or proposed buildings.
[51 FR 30313, Aug. 25, 1986, as amended at 66 FR 22442, May 4, 2001]
Dear Mr. Hagler:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition 

(Docket No. FAA−2015−3281). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any 

further, we must receive the information described above by 12/7/15. If we do not receive the 

information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4549.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael J. Cameron

Program Analyst
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 10.416 Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment. ( a ) *Effect of noncompliance.* If the importer fails to comply with any requirement under this subpart, including submission of a certification of origin or other information demonstrating that the good qualifies as originating under § 10.411(a) of this subpart or submission of a corrected certification under § 10.413 of this subpart, the Center director may deny preferential tariff treatment to the imported good.
( b ) *Failure to provide documentation regarding transshipment.* Where the requirements for preferential tariff treatment set forth elsewhere in this subpart are met, the Center director nevertheless may deny preferential tariff treatment to an originating good if the good is shipped through or transshipped in a country other than Chile or the United States, and the importer of the good does not provide, at the request of the Center director, copies of documents demonstrating to the satisfaction of the Center director that the requirements set forth in § 10.463 of this subpart were met.
[CBP Dec. 05-07, 70 FR 10873, Mar. 7, 2005, as amended by CBP Dec. 06-39, 71 FR 76133, Dec. 20, 2006]
### §292. Positions affected

This chapter shall apply to—

(1) all positions under the Clerk, the Sergeant at Arms, the Chief Administrative Officer, and the Inspector General of the House of Representatives, except the positions of telephone operator and positions on the United States Capitol Police force;

(2) the position of minority pair clerk in the House;

(3) all positions under the House Recording Studio; and

(4) all positions under the House Radio and Television Correspondents' Gallery and the House Periodical Press Gallery.

(Pub. L. 88–652, §3, Oct. 13, 1964, 78 Stat. 1079; Pub. L. 104–53, title I, §108(1), Nov. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 522.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 88–652, Oct. 13, 1964, 78 Stat. 1079, known as the House Employees Position Classification Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 291 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1995—Par. (1). Pub. L. 104–53 substituted "Chief Administrative Officer, and the Inspector General" for "Doorkeeper, and the Postmaster,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1965, see section 17 of Pub. L. 88–652, set out as a note under section 291 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93021, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 151.44 Storage tanks. ( a ) *Plans and gauge tables.* When petroleum or petroleum products subject to duty at a specific rate per barrel are imported in bulk in tank vessels and are to be transferred into shore storage tanks, both the plans of each shore tank showing all outlets and inlets and the gauge table for each tank showing its capacity in barrels per centimeter or tenth of a centimeter of height shall be certified as correct by the proprietor of the tank. One set of these plans and gauge tables so certified shall be kept on file at the plant of the oil company and shall be available at all times to Customs officers. Another certified set of the shore tank plans and gauge tables shall be filed with the port director for use in verifying the Customs officers' reports. The port director may require such additional sets of shore tank plans, including subsidiary pipeline plans, and gauge tables as he may deem necessary. The storage tank proprietor shall maintain the plans and gauge tables for 3 years after discontinuing use of the storage tanks as bonded warehouses for the storage of imported petroleum or petroleum products.
( b ) *Tags required on valves.* The inlet and outlet valves of each tank shall have tags of a permanent type affixed by the proprietor or lessee indicating the use of the valves.
( c ) *Verification of gauge tables.* Whenever he has reason to suspect their reliability, the port director may require the measurement and calibrations shown on the gauge tables to be verified by a Customs officer. If no qualified Customs officer is available, the port director may accept an independent certification verifying the measurements and calibrations. The independent verification shall be performed at the expense of the storage tank proprietor.
[T.D. 80-142, 45 FR 36384, May 30, 1980, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51268, Dec. 21, 1988]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-23361-CIV-UNGARO/O’SULLIVAN

UBALDO ALMAREZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

PHIMICO CO., LLC., et al.,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND 

RECOMMENDING THAT THE CASE BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE

THIS MATTER came before the Court following a settlement conference before

the undersigned and the Court having conducted a hearing concerning the settlement. 

THE COURT has heard from counsel and considered the terms of the settlement

agreement, the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise fully advised in the

premises.

This case involves claims for unpaid overtime compensation under the Fair Labor

Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §201, et seq. ("FLSA"). In reviewing a settlement of an FLSA

private claim, a court must "scrutiniz[e] the settlement for fairness," and determine that

the settlement is a "fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over FLSA

provisions." Lynn Food Stores v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352-53 (11th Cir.

1982). A settlement entered into in an adversarial context where both sides are

represented by counsel throughout litigation "is more likely to reflect a reasonable

compromise of disputed issues." Id. The district court may approve the settlement in

order to promote the policy of encouraging settlement of litigation. Id. at 1354.

In this case, there is a legal dispute over whether the plaintiff is entitled to half

Case 1:20-cv-23361-UU Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/2020 Page 1 of 2
time or time and a half compensation. The terms of the settlement were announced on

the record in open Court. The Court has reviewed the terms of the settlement

agreement including the amount to be received by the plaintiff and the attorney’s fees

and costs to be received by counsel and finds that the compromise reached by the

parties is a fair and reasonable resolution of the parties' bona fide disputes. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the parties' settlement agreement (including

attorney’s fees and costs) is hereby APPROVED. It is further

RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed with prejudice and that the Court

retain jurisdiction until April 27, 2021 to enforce the terms of the settlement. The

parties consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction for any further matters in this

case.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 28th day of October,

2020. 

 

 

JOHN J. O'SULLIVAN

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 1:20-cv-23361-UU Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/2020 Page 2 of 2
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-42 May 5, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT FERMI NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Lisle, Illinois, have

announced the assignment of Garry Harris as the agency's Senior

Resident Inspector at the Fermi nuclear power plant in Monroe,

Michigan.

Harris joined the NRC in 1990 as an operator licensing examiner

and later worked as a project engineer. Most recently, he had

been a resident inspector at the McGuire nuclear power plant in

North Carolina. Prior to joining the NRC, he worked on

assignment with the Institute for Nuclear Power Operations as a

nuclear plant maintenance evaluator. Also, for two years he was

a reactor service engineer for Westinghouse Electric Corporation.

He received a bachelor's degree in nuclear engineering from the

University of Virginia and a master's degree in technology

management from Southern College of Technology. Harris currently

resides in Dearborn, Michigan.

Harris joins NRC Resident Inspector Neil O'Keefe. They can be

reached at the Fermi plant at 313/586-2798.

####
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

STEVETTE DUKES, as Plenary Guardian of the property of KIARA SHANISE DUKES, an incapacitated person, LATOYA DUKES and

BRANDON ELLIS , Appellant s ,

v.

MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC., a foreign corporation, TAKATA CORPORATION, a foreign corporation headquartered in Japan, and TK HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 17

- 240

[ April 4, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; J anet Carney Crooms , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 56

- 2012

- CA

002094 and 56

- 2013

- CA

- 001009

.

Philip M. Burlington and Adam Rich a rdson of Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., West Palm Beach, Darryl L. Lewis and Michael H. Kugler of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shiple y, P.A., West Palm Beach, Henry D. Didier of Didier Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, and John Blaise Gsanger of Edwards Law Firm, Corpus Christi, Texas, for appellants.

Wendy F. Lumish of Bowman and Brooke, LLP, Miami, for Appellee Michelin North America, Inc.

C hristine Davis Graves and James Parker

- Flynn of Carlton Fields, Tallahassee, for Appellees Takata Corporation and TK Holdings, Inc.

Theresa Wardon Benz, Michael L. O’Donnell and Edward C. Stewart of Wheeler Trigg O’Donnell LLP, Denver, Colorado, Pro Hac V ice for Appellee Michelin North America, Inc.

Thomas P. Branigan and Jeffrey T. Gorcyca of Bowman and Brooke LLP, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, Pro Hac Vice for Appellees Takata Corporation and TK Holdings, Inc.

P ER C URIAM

.2 Affirmed.

T

AYLOR
, C IKLIN and L EVINE , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.