alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         528,392
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               529,045
<PP&E>                                              20
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 529,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,768
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                     527,259
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   529,065
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,056
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,985
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     71
<INCOME-TAX>                                        64
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  7
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         7
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Order entered December 5, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00739-CR

No. 05-16-00793-CR

MIGUEL GONZALES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F15-59527 & F15-59528

ORDER

The Court has before it appellant’s November 30, 2016 second motion to extend time to 

file his brief in which he asserts the reporter’s record must be corrected before he is able to 

present his issues on appeal. Specifically, appellant states, and our review confirms, that pages 

41-88 contained in volume 4 (voir dire) are duplications of pages 41-88 of volume 5 (jury trial). 

When contacted, court reporter Karren Jones informed appellant that she would need thirty days 

in which to correct the record.

We GRANT appellant’s motion. We ORDER court reporter Karren Jones to file a 

corrected volume 4 of voir dire no later than December 29, 2016. Appellant’s brief is due 

thirty days after the corrected volume 4 of the reporter’s record is filed or January 30, 2017, 

whichever is earlier. 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 240 (Friday, December 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 64351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27152]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4407-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2018-0001]


California; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of California (FEMA-4407-DR), dated November 12, 2018, 
and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued November 29, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective November 25, 2018.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2018-27152 Filed 12-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-11-P
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMechanical strength and thermophysical properties of PM212: A high temperature self-lubricating powder metallurgy compositeA powder metallurgy composite, PM212, composed of metal bonded chromium carbide and solid lubricants is shown to be self-lubricating to a maximum application temperature of 900 C. The high temperature compressive strength, tensile strength, thermal expansion and thermal conductivity data needed to design PM212 sliding contact bearings and seals are reported for sintered and isostatically pressed (HIPed) versions of PM212. Other properties presented are room temperature density, hardness, and elastic modulus. In general, both versions appear to have adequate strength to be considered as sliding contact bearing materials, but the HIPed version, which is fully dense, is much stronger than the sintered version which contains about 20 percent pore volume. The sintered material is less costly to make, but the HIPed version is better where high compressive strength is important.Document ID19910011989Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsEdwards, Phillip M.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH., United States)*Sliney, Harold E.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Dellacorte, Christopher*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Whittenberger, J. Daniel*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Martineau, Robert R.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1990Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberE-5913NASA-TM-103694NAS 1.15:103694DOE/NASA/50162-5Accession Number91N21302Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: DE-AI01-85CE-50162PROJECT: RTOP 778-34-22Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910011989.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
                      BUILDING MATERIALS HOLDING CORPORATION
                        Computation of Earnings Per Share


For the Year Ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            1997          1996           1995
                                                                        ------------  -------------  ------------
<S>                                                                     <C>           <C>            <C>

COMPUTATION OF BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
Net income............................................................  $  9,493,000  $  10,649,000  $  7,765,000
Class B preferred stock accretion.....................................        (6,500)       (34,000)      (34,000)
                                                                        ------------  -------------  ------------
Net Income available to common stock..................................  $  9,486,500  $  10,615,000  $  7,731,000
                                                                        ------------  -------------  ------------
Weighted average shares outstanding...................................    11,919,469     10,759,892     9,498,375
                                                                        ------------  -------------  ------------
Basic Earnings Per Share..............................................  $       0.80  $        0.99  $       0.81
                                                                        ------------  -------------  ------------
COMPUTATION OF DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
Net Income Available to Common Stock..................................  $  9,486,500  $  10,615,000  $  7,731,000
                                                                        ------------  -------------  ------------
Weighted average shares outstanding...................................    11,919,469     10,759,892     9,498,375
Net effect of dilutive stock options based on the treasury stock
  method using average market price...................................       217,410        238,243       253,172
                                                                        ------------  -------------  ------------
Total shares outstanding..............................................    12,136,879     10,998,135     9,751,547
                                                                        ------------  -------------  ------------
Diluted Earnings Per Share............................................  $       0.78  $        0.97  $       0.79
                                                                        ------------  -------------  ------------
</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 152
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 152 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93022, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 152.101 Basis of appraisement. ( a ) *Effective date.* The value for appraisement of merchandise exported to the United States on or after July 1, 1980, or, for articles classified under subheading 6401.10.00 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202), on or after July 1, 1981, will be determined in accordance with section 402, Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1401a), as amended by section 201, Trade Agreements Act of 1979.
( b ) *Methods.* Imported merchandise will be appraised on the basis, and in the order, of the following: ( 1 ) The transaction value provided for in § 152.103;
( 2 ) The transaction value of identical merchandise provided for in § 152.104, if the transaction value cannot be determined, or can be determined but cannot be used because of the limitations provided for in § 152.103(j);
( 3 ) The transaction value of similar merchandise provided for in § 152.104, if the transaction value of identical merchandise cannot be determined;
( 4 ) The deductive value provided for in § 152.105, if the transaction value of similar merchandise cannot be determined;
( 5 ) The computed value provided for in § 152.106, if the deductive value cannot be determined; or
( 6 ) The value provided for in § 152.107, if the computed value cannot be determined.
( c ) *Importer's option.* The importer may request the application of the computed value method before the deductive value method. The request must be made at the time the entry summary for the merchandise is filed with CBP, either at the port of entry or electronically (see § 141.0a(b) of this chapter). If the importer makes the request, but the value of the imported merchandise cannot be determined using the computed value method, the merchandise will be appraised using the deductive value method if it is possible to do so. If the deductive value cannot be determined, the appraised value will be determined as provided for in § 152.107.
( d ) *Explanation to importer.* Upon receipt of a written request from the importer within 90 days after liquidation, the Center director shall provide a reasonable and concise written explanation of how the value of the imported merchandise was determined. The explanation will apply only to the imported merchandise being appraised and will not serve as authority with respect to the valuation of importations of any other merchandise at the same or a different port of entry. This procedure is for informational purposes only, and will not affect or replace the protest or administrative ruling procedures contained in parts 174 and 177, respectively, of this chapter, or any other Customs procedures. Under this procedure, Customs will not be required to release any information not otherwise subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552), the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), or any other statute (see part 103 of this chapter).
[T.D. 81-7, 46 FR 2600, Jan. 12, 1981, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51270, Dec. 21, 1988]
§ 162.95 Release of seized property. ( a ) *Generally.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a claimant to seized property under 18 U.S.C. 983(a) is entitled to immediate release of the property if: ( 1 ) The claimant has a possessory interest in the property;
( 2 ) The claimant has sufficient ties to the community to provide assurance that the property will be available at the time of trial;
( 3 ) The continued possession of the property by Customs pending the final disposition of forfeiture proceedings will cause substantial hardship to the claimant, such as preventing an individual from working, or leaving an individual homeless; and
( 4 ) The claimant's likely hardship from the continued possession by Customs of the seized property outweighs the risk that the property will be destroyed, damaged, lost, concealed, or transferred if it is returned to the claimant during the pendency of the proceedings.
( b ) *Exceptions.* Immediate release of seized property under paragraph (a) of this section will not apply if the seized property: ( 1 ) Is contraband, currency or other monetary instrument, or electronic funds, unless, in the case of currency, other monetary instrument or electronic funds, such property comprises the assets of a legitimate business which has been seized;
( 2 ) Is to be used as evidence of a violation of the law;
( 3 ) By reason of design or other characteristic, is particularly suited for use in illegal activities; or
( 4 ) Is likely to be used to commit additional criminal acts if returned to the claimant.
( c ) *Request for release.* A claimant seeking release of property under this section must request possession of the property from the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer who issued the notice of seizure. The request need not be made in any particular form, but must be in writing and set forth the basis on which the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section have been met. The request may be filed at any time during which the property remains under seizure.
( d ) *Granting request for release.* The Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer may release the property if it is determined to be appropriate under paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section.
( e ) *Denial of or failure to act on request for release.* If the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer denies the request for release or fails to make a decision on the request by the 15th calendar day after the date the request is received by Customs, the claimant may file a petition in the district court in which the complaint has been filed, or, if no complaint has been filed, in the U.S. district court in which the seizure warrant was issued or in the U.S. district court for the district in which the property was seized.
[T.D. 00-88, 65 FR 78091, Dec. 14, 2000, as amended by T.D. 02-08, 67 FR 9191, Feb. 28, 2002]
#### § 123.81 Merchandise found in building on the boundary.

When any merchandise on which the duty has not been paid or which was imported contrary to law is found in any building upon or within 10 feet of the boundary line between the United States and Canada or Mexico, such merchandise shall be seized and a report of the facts shall be made to the Commissioner. With his approval the building or that portion thereof which is within the United States shall be taken down or removed. The provisions of subpart B of part 162, of this chapter shall be applicable to the search of any such building.

[T.D. 70-121, 35 FR 8215, May 26, 1970, as amended by T.D. 72-211, 37 FR 16487, Aug. 15, 1972. Redesignated by T.D. 99-2, 64 FR 31, Jan. 4, 1999]
### SUBCHAPTER VIII—SULPHUR
### §687. Suits by Comptroller General

If, under this chapter, budget authority is required to be made available for obligation and such budget authority is not made available for obligation, the Comptroller General is hereby expressly empowered, through attorneys of his own selection, to bring a civil action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to require such budget authority to be made available for obligation, and such court is hereby expressly empowered to enter in such civil action, against any department, agency, officer, or employee of the United States, any decree, judgment, or order which may be necessary or appropriate to make such budget authority available for obligation. No civil action shall be brought by the Comptroller General under this section until the expiration of 25 calendar days of continuous session of the Congress following the date on which an explanatory statement by the Comptroller General of the circumstances giving rise to the action contemplated has been filed with the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 93–344, title X, §1016, July 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 336; Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, §402(35), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3360; Pub. L. 100–119, title II, §206(b), Sept. 29, 1987, 101 Stat. 786.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1406 of Title 31 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 31, Money and Finance, by Pub. L. 97–258, §1, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 877.

#### Amendments

1987—Pub. L. 100–119 substituted "If, under this chapter" for "If, under section 683(b) or 684(b) of this title".

1984—Pub. L. 98–620 struck out provision requiring that the courts give precedence to civil actions brought under this section, and to appeals and writs from decisions in such actions, over all other civil actions, appeals, and writs.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–620 not applicable to cases pending on Nov. 8, 1984, see section 403 of Pub. L. 98–620, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1657 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Reaffirmation

For provision reaffirming this section, see section 206(c) of Pub. L. 100–119, set out as a note under section 686 of this title.
§ 143.6 Failure to maintain performance standards. ABI participants must adhere to the performance requirements and operational standards of the ABI system and maintain a high level of quality in the transmission of data, as defined in Customs Publication 552 (CATAIR) and Customs directives and policy statements, in order to participate in ABI. ( a ) *Probational status.* A participant who does not adhere to the requirements and standards of the ABI system or maintain a high level of quality as described above may be placed on probational status. The participant will be notified, electronically and in writing, by the Director, User Support Services Division, of any action to place the participant on probation. The notice will specifically set forth the grounds for the proposed probation, and advise the participant that he will have 15 days from the date of the notice to show cause why the probationary period should not take effect. If the participant fails to respond within the allotted time, or fails to show to the satisfaction of the Director, User Support Services Division, that the probationary period should not take effect, the Director will notify the participant of the effective date of the probationary period. The length of the probationary period may, in the discretion of the Director, User Support Services Division, be extended up to a maximum of 90 days, if the participant's performance remains below standard, but, except for immediate revocation under § 143.7, participation will not be suspended or revoked until the probationary period has lasted a minimum of 30 days. The participant's performance will be closely monitored during this time, which will include working with the participant and providing any necessary guidance to assist the participant in bringing his performance back to standard.
( b ) *Suspension following probationary period.* If deficiencies are not corrected within the probationary period, the participant will be suspended from operational status. The participant will be notified, electronically and in writing, by the Director, User Support Services Division, of any action to suspend participation. The notice will specifically set forth the grounds and effective date for the suspension, and the right to appeal the suspension to the Assistant Commissioner, Information and Technology, within 10 days following the date of the written notice of suspension (see § 143.8).
( c ) *Reinstatement following suspension.* To obtain reinstatement to operational status, a suspended participant must submit a letter to the Director, User Support Services Division, stating that the deficiencies for which the suspension was invoked have been corrected. If, after the participant has demonstrated compliance with the system performance requirements and operational standards specified in § 143.5 of this part, if required, the Director is satisfied that the deficiencies have been corrected, the participant will be reinstated.