alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21



Midas, Inc.

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

As of January 1, 2005



|                                         |  |                        |  |                                                       
|---------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Name                                     |  | Place of Incorporation |  | Percent of Stock Owned or Controlled by the Registrant
|Midas, Inc. (Registrant)                 |  | Delaware               |  | 100%                                                  
|Midas International Corporation          |  | Delaware               |  | 100%                                                  
|Midas Illinois, Inc.                     |  | Illinois               |  | 100%                                                  
|Midas Realty Corporation                 |  | Delaware               |  | 100%                                                  
|Midas Properties, Inc.                   |  | New York               |  | 100%                                                  
|Muffler Corporation of America           |  | Illinois               |  | 100%                                                  
|Dealers Wholesale, Inc.                  |  | Delaware               |  | 100%                                                  
|Huth, Inc.                               |  | Delaware               |  | 100%                                                  
|International Parts Corporation          |  | Delaware               |  | 100%                                                  
|Parts Warehouse, Inc.                    |  | Delaware               |  | 100%                                                  
|Midas International Corporation (Wyo)    |  | Wyoming                |  | 100%                                                  
|Progressive Automotive Systems, Inc.     |  | Delaware               |  | 100%                                                  
|Cosmic Holdings LLC                      |  | Delaware               |  | 100%                                                  
|MDS Automotive Holdings, B.V.            |  | Netherlands            |  | 100%                                                  
|Midas Automotive International, B.V.     |  | Netherlands            |  | 100%                                                  
|Midas Canada Holdings Ltd                |  | Canada                 |  | 100%                                                  
|Midas Canada Inc.                        |  | Canada                 |  | 100%                                                  
|Midas Realty Corporation of Canada, Inc. |  | Canada                 |  | 100%
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Shore Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott C. Harvard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: March 20, 2007

 

This certificate accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and will not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

 

82
Order entered December j , 2012

In The 

# Court of appeal; liftb 313ilitritt of Texao at 3113affao

No. 05-12-01522-CR EX PARTE KEITH D. ROANE On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 003-86164-04



### ORDER On November 14, 2012, the Court ordered the Collin County Clerk to file the clerk's record containing the documents related to appellant's application for writ of habeas corpus, including the trial court's written order ruling on appellant's application and the trial court's certification of appellant's right to appeal. The clerk's record filed on November 30, 2012 does not contain either the trial court's written order or the certification of appellant's right to appeal. The docket sheet notation showing the judge's ruling does not satisfy the requirement of a written order. Accordingly, we ORDER the Collin County Clerk to file, within the Collin County Clerk to file, within SEVEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk's record containing the trial court's written order ruling on appellant's application for writ of habeas corpus and the trial court's certification of appellant's right to appeal.

### We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the

following:

• Honorable Lance Baxter, Presiding Judge, County Court at Law No. 3;

• Collin County Clerk; and

• Collin County District Attorney's Office. We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first-class mail, to Keith D. Roane, 809 Lake Place, Azle, Texas 76020.

* 4- 4 114— LANA MYERS JUSTICE
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report dated March 31, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of OMNI Energy Services Corp. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. We hereby consentto the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of OMNI Energy Services Corp. on Forms S-8 (No. 333-160462, effective July 7, 2009; File No. 333-126679, effective July 18, 2005; File No. 333-110198,effective November 3, 2003; File No. 333-35816, effective April 27, 2000; File No. 333-80973, effective June 18, 1999 and File No. 333-49409, effective April 3, 1998) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-131696, effective March 13,2009). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Houston, Texas 

March 31, 2010
FinalReport00LSIMedienceCorporationCOPYOFTHEORIGINALKUMAMOTOLABORATORYLSIMEDIENCECORPORATIONSTUDYDIRECTOR:To"'o11n,.:DATE:/vlay9.;g,/'f1.StatementSponsor:Title:StudyNumber:0022.Contents003004Finalpage23005006007008009001000II001200130014001500160017001800192021220023
### §117j. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 117j was editorially reclassified as section 5541 of this title.
§ 148.22 Examination of air travelers' baggage in foreign territory. ( a ) *Examination and surrender of declaration.* When places have been established in a foreign country where U.S. Customs officers have been stationed for the purpose of conducting Customs inspections and examinations (see §§ 101.5 and 162.8 of this chapter), persons destined to the United States on flights shall present themselves to those officers for inspection and examination of their baggage which may be passed in accordance with § 148.23 prior to boarding the flight. They shall comply with all U.S. Customs laws and other civil and criminal laws of the United States relating to importation of merchandise, including baggage, to the filing of false or fraudulent statements, and to the unlawful removal of merchandise from Customs custody, in the same manner as if the passengers, were arriving at an airport within the Customs territory of the United States. When baggage is examined in foreign territory, the baggage declaration shall be surrendered to the Customs officer at the airport of departure for the United States prior to boarding the flight.
( b ) *Subsequently acquired articles.* When a person whose baggage has been examined and passed in foreign territory in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section subsequently acquires additional articles prior to return to the United States, the Customs officer to whom the declaration was surrendered may permit the amendment of that declaration to include the additional articles.
[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. 77-241, 42 FR 54944, Oct. 12, 1977; T.D. 89-22, 54 FR 5076, Feb. 1, 1989]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CIV-81205-RAR

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 

GROUP, INC. d/b/a PAR FUNDING, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING RECEIVER’S EXPEDITED MOTION 

TO APPROVE RETAINED PROFESSIONAL

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Receiver Ryan K. Stumphauzer’s Expedited 

Motion to Approve Retained Professional [ECF No. 101] (“Motion”), filed on August 6, 2020. 

On August 7, 2020, Defendants Joseph Cole Barleta, L.M.E Family Trust, and Lisa McElhone 

filed a response to the Motion and a “Cross Motion to Have This Court Direct the Receiver to 

Immediately Engage Approximately 70 Skilled, Knowledgeable and Experienced CBSG 

Employees” [ECF No. 106] (“Cross-Motion”). Defendant Dean J. Vagnozzi also filed a Response 

on August 7, 2020 [ECF No. 109] (“Response”). The Court having reviewed the Motion, the 

Cross-Motion, the Response, the Receiver’s Reply [ECF No. 114], and the Reply in Support of 

the Cross-Motion [ECF No. 115] (“Cross-Motion Reply”), and being otherwise fully advised, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Receiver’s Motion [ECF No. 101] is GRANTED

and the Cross-Motion [ECF No. 106] is DENIED without prejudice. The Receiver is authorized 

to engage the services of the financial advisor and operational consulting firm described in the 

Motion at the stated hourly rates. At this juncture, the Court is unwilling to direct implementation 

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 116 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2020 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

of the Proposed Action Plan set forth in the Cross-Motion Reply. See Cross-Motion Reply at 7-9. 

However, upon retaining the financial advisor and operational consulting firm described in the 

Motion, the Receiver shall examine the feasibility of implementing some or all of the Proposed 

Action Plan. At the status conference scheduled for August 17, 2020 at 2:30 P.M., the Receiver 

shall advise the Court regarding the feasibility of implementing the Proposed Action Plan 

consistent with the duties the Court imposed on the Receiver. See Order Granting Plaintiff’s 

Urgent Motion to Amend Order Appointing Receiver to Include Litigation Injunction [ECF No. 

56]. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 9th day of August, 2020.

_________________________________

RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: Counsel of record

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 116 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2020 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.25

                   SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("Amendment") is made
this 1st day of February, 1999, by and between CONVERGENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
a Colorado corporation ("Employer" or the "Company") and JOHN J. PHIBBS
("Employee").

     A.  The Parties have entered into that certain Employment Agreement dated
March 3, 1997, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Employment
Agreement dated April 13, 1998 (collectively the "Agreement");

     B.  The Parties desire to amend and modify certain of the terms and
conditions of the Agreement;

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual premises and covenants
contained herein and in the Agreement, the Parties agree as follows:

     1.  Compensation and Benefits.
         ------------------------- 

         1.1  Section 3.1 of the Agreement shall be amended to increase
Employee's annual base salary to One Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars
($175,000.00).

         1.2  Section 3.2 of the Agreement shall be amended to change Employee's
target bonus to Seventy-Five Percent (75%), commencing with the 1999 fiscal year
and thereafter.

     2.  Other Terms and Conditions.  All other terms and conditions of the
         --------------------------                                        
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, as if fully stated herein.

     3.  Capitalized Terms.  Capitalized terms, and other defined terms, shall
         -----------------                                                    
have the same meaning as that accorded to them in the Agreement, unless the
context requires otherwise.

     4.  Conflict.  If there are any conflicting terms or conditions between the
         --------                                                               
terms and conditions of this Amendment and the terms and conditions of the
Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall control.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Amendment to
be executed by its duly authorized representative on the day and year first
above written.

          CONVERGENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,  JOHN J. PHIBBS
a Colorado corporation


By /s/ John R. Evans                    /s/ John J. Phibbs
  ____________________________________  ___________________________________
<PAGE>
 
     John R. Evans, Chief Executive Officer

                                       2
Exhibit 15.6



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTRERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-156686) of our report dated March 29, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
of Sapiens International Corporation N.V. included in this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Formula Systems
(1985) Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2014.



|Tel- Aviv, Israel |  | /s/
    Kost, Forer, Gabbay & Kasierer
|----------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|June 30, 2015     |  | KOST, FORER, GABBAY & KASIERER        
|                  |  | A Member of Ernst & Young Global
(November 19, 1943.)

#### Gertrude V. Pincus, Appellant, v. Joseph Pincus, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.
§ 200.735-116 Time and place for submission of employees' statements. ( a ) An employee required to submit such a statement shall submit it not later than: ( 1 ) Ninety days after the effective date of the regulations in this part, if employed on or before that effective date; or
( 2 ) Thirty days after his entrance on duty, but not earlier than ninety days after the effective date, if appointed after the effective date.
( b ) Each such statement shall be submitted to the Office of the General Counsel of the Commission and shall be marked “Submitted in Confidence to the Deputy DAEO.”: *Provided,* That the statement of the Deputy DAEO shall be submitted directly to the DAEO.
[31 FR 2593, Feb. 10, 1966, as amended at 56 FR 36726, Aug. 1, 1991]
**Exhibit
      23**




**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**







Audit
      Committee, Board of Directors and Stockholders


Guaranty
      Federal Bancshares, Inc.


Springfield,
      Missouri








We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
      333-47241, 333-31196, 333-65544, 333-83822 and 333-117918 on Forms S-8 of
      Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated March 27, 2007, relating
      to the consolidated balance sheets of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. as
      of
      December 31, 2006, and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income,
      stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005
      and 2004, which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Guaranty Federal
      Bancshares, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2006.




**/s/BKD,** **LLP**






Springfield,
      Missouri


March
      27,
      2007
### SUBCHAPTER V—CONGRESSIONAL JOINT COMMITTEE ON LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS
### §79. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 79 was editorially reclassified as section 5603 of this title.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diametrics Medical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David B. Kaysen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David B. KaysenDavid B. Kaysen Chief Executive Officer October 24, 2003
Exhibit 23




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





Audit Committee, Board of Directors and Stockholders


Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc.


Springfield, Missouri








We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-170205, 333-47241, 333-31196, 333-65544, 333-83822 and 333-117918 on Forms S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-157634 on Form S-3 of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated March 30, 2011 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




/s/BKD, LLP




Springfield, Missouri


March 30, 2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice of membership of the USCCR Performance Review Board. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the appointment of the Performance Review Board (PRB) of the United States Commission on Civil Rights. Publication of PRB membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).

The PRB provides fair and impartial review of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights' Senior Executive Service performance appraisals and makes recommendations regarding performance ratings and performance awards to the Staff Director, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights for the FY2003 rating year.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janice Minor, Human Resources Assistant, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 9th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20425, (202) 376-8364.

Members: Gloria Gutierrez, Deputy Administrator for Management, Food and Nutrition Service, USDA; Jill M. Crumpacker, Director, Policy & Performance Management, Chief, Human Capitol Officer, Federal Labor Relations Authority; Joseph Mancias, Senior Management Counsel, Department Homeland Security.

TinaLouise Martin,

Director of Human Resources, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

[FR Doc. 04-23573 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-M
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-12 January 16, 1998

NRC SEEKS COMMENT ON PETITION FOR RULEMAKING

CONCERNING USE OF THYROID-PROTECTING DRUG IN EMERGENCY RESPONSE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment

on a petition for rulemaking which asks that the NRC modify its

regulation, 10 CFR 50.47 (b) (10), to require that nuclear power

plant emergency plans consider the inclusion of the use of

potassium iodide, a thyroid-protecting drug, for the general

public.

The deadline for comments is February 17.

Current Federal policy, published July 24, 1985, calls for

potassium iodide to be stockpiled for distribution during

emergencies to emergency workers and institutionalized persons.

If taken in time, the substance blocks most of the thyroid

gland’s uptake of radioactive iodine. It could thus help reduce

the risk of thyroid cancer and other diseases that might

otherwise be caused by exposure to radioactive iodine which could

be dispersed in a severe nuclear accident.

The Commission last year voted to approve a proposed

revision to the current Federal policy which would offer to

provide funding for states which want to stockpile potassium

iodide for use by the general public in the event of a nuclear

power plant emergency.

The rulemaking petition now pending before the Commission

calls for a change in NRC regulations to specify that states and

licensees consider the use of potassium iodide, as well as

evacuation and sheltering, in the preparation of nuclear power

plant emergency plans.

The petition was filed by Peter G. Crane, an NRC staff

attorney who took the action as a private citizen. The original

January 16 deadline for comments has been extended by 30 days to

allow sufficient time for public comment. Persons wishing copies

of the petition may write: Rules and Directives Branch, Division
of Administrative Services, Office of Administration, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555. A copy of

the petition and other related documents are also available at

the NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street NW (Lower Level),

Washington, DC. The petition also may be accessed on the Internet

at http://ruleforum.llnl.gov/cgi-bin/rulemake?source=KI_PETITION.

Comments should be mailed to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention:

Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. Comments also may be

delivered to 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD, between 7:30 a.

m. and 4:15 p. m. on Federal workdays. They also may be provided

through the NRC’s interactive rulemaking website, which may be

reached via the Internet at http://www.nrc.gov by looking for

rulemaking under the heading “Public Participation and School

Programs.”

###
#### § 147.21 Marking under the Tariff Act of 1930.

The marking requirements of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and the regulations thereunder will not apply to articles for a fair, except, when such articles are entered for consumption. When entered for consumption, such articles shall be released from Customs custody only upon a full compliance with these marking requirements.