alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32(a)





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, OF THE


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Rocky Brands, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mike
Brooks, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Mike BrooksMike
      Brooks, Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerJuly
      31, 2009
**Exhibit
        23.2**
 **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 
 The
        Board
        of Directors
 LiveDeal,
        Inc.:
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
        LiveDeal, Inc., f/k/a YP Corp. and  Yp.Net, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No.
        333-107721) filed as of August 7, 2003, of our report dated December 18,
        2006,
        on the consolidated balance sheet of LiveDeal, Inc. as of September 30, 2006
        and
        the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
        cash
        flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended September 30, 2006,
        which report appears in LiveDeal, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form
        10-K.
 
 /s/
        Epstein, Weber & Conover P.L.C.
 
 Scottsdale,
        Arizona
 December
        18, 2007
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-02-0111 - Proposed Rule to Amend 10 CFR Part 35 To Require Licensees to Notify NRC of an Individual Receiving a Dose Exceeding 50 Millisieverts (5REM) from A Patient Released Under 10 CFR 35.75

Accession Number: ML010120183

Date Released: Tuesday, August 27, 2002

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML010920283 - SECY-02-0111 - Proposed Rule to Amend 10 CFR Part 35 to Require Licensees to Notify NRC of an Individual Receiving a Dose Exceeding 50 Millisieverts (5 REM) From a Patient Released Under 10 CFR 35.75 (6 page(s), 6/21/2002)
    - ML003762222 - SRM-M001023-Affirmation Session- I. SECY-00-0118 - Final Rules - 10 CFR Part 35, "Medical Use of Byproduct Material" and 10 CFR Part 20, "Standards for Protection Against Radiation" (10 page(s), 10/23/2000)
    - ML011900112 - SECY-02-0111-Attachment 2-Agreement State Comments re:  Proposed Rule to Amend 10 CFR Part 35 to Require Licensees to Notify NRC of An Individual Receiving A Dose Exceeding 50 Millisieverts (5 REM) From a Patient Released Under 10 CFR 35.75 (5 page(s), 6/21/2002)
    - ML010920404 - SECY-02-0111-Attachment 3-Federal Register Notice re:  Proposed Rule to Amend 10 CFR Part 35 to Require Licensees to Notify NRC of An Individual Receiving A Dose Exceeding 50 Millisieverts (5 REM) From A Patient Released Under 10 CFR 35.75 (17 page(s), 6/21/2002)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

      ( print page 61872)    
                    Notice is hereby given that, ,on September 20, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers (“SCTE”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                 

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers, Exton, PA. The nature and scope of SCTE's standards development activities are: the development of standards, specifications, and technical reports in the field of cable telecommunications. Standardization topics include, but are not limited to, definitions and terminology; methods of measurement and test; products; systems, technology rating structures; thermal limits and applications guides; recommended practices; materials; and safety. 

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-23538  Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 205 (Monday, October 25, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23797]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employee Benefits Security Administration


Working Group on Plan Fees and Reporting on Form 5500 Advisory 
Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans; Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, a 
public meeting will be held on Wednesday, November 10, 2004, of the 
Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans Working 
Group assigned to study plan fees as reported on the Form 5500. The 
working group is studying plan fees as reported on the Form 5500 to 
assess plan sponsors' understanding of the fees they are paying and the 
reporting requirements.
    The session will take place in Room N-3437 A-C, U.S. Department of 
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. The purpose 
of the open meeting, which will run from 9:30 a.m. to approximately 12 
p.m., is for Working Group members to conclude their report/
recommendations for the Secretary of Labor.
    Organizations or members of the public wishing to submit a written 
statement pertaining to the topic may do so by submitting 20 copies to 
Larry Good, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory Council, U.S. 
Department of Labor, Room N-5656, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20210. Statements received on or before November 3, 2004 
will be included in the record of the meeting. Individuals or 
representatives of organizations wishing to address the Working Group 
should forward their request to the Executive Secretary at the above 
address or via telephone at (202) 693-8668. Oral presentations will be 
limited to 20 minutes, but an extended statement may be submitted for 
the record. Individuals with disabilities who need special 
accommodations should contact Larry Good by November 3 at the address 
indicated in this notice.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 19th day of October, 2004.
Ann L. Combs,
Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-23797 Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 0:20-cv-61702-AHS 

KRISTEN POWELL,

individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated, CLASS ACTION 

Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

v. 

RETAILMENOT, INC., 

a Texas corporation, 

Defendant. 

 / 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

 Plaintiff Kristen Powell, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), 

hereby voluntarily dismisses the instant action. All claims of Plaintiff, individually, are hereby 

dismissed without prejudice. 

Dated: September 24, 2020 

Respectfully submitted, 

HIRALDO P.A. 

 

/s/ Manuel S. Hiraldo 

Manuel S. Hiraldo 

Florida Bar No. 030380 

401 E. Las Olas Boulevard 

Suite 1400 

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 

Email: mhiraldo@hiraldolaw.com 

Telephone: 954.400.4713 

Case 0:20-cv-61702-AHS Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/24/2020 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 635 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 635

To reauthorize The Last Green Valley National Heritage Corridor and the 
Upper Housatonic Valley National Heritage Area, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 9, 2021

Mr. Murphy (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, and Mr. Markey) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reauthorize The Last Green Valley National Heritage Corridor and the 
Upper Housatonic Valley National Heritage Area, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``The Last Green Valley National 
Heritage Corridor and the Upper Housatonic Valley National Heritage 
Area Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE LAST GREEN VALLEY NATIONAL HERITAGE 
              CORRIDOR AND THE UPPER HOUSATONIC VALLEY NATIONAL 
              HERITAGE AREA.

    (a) Last Green Valley National Heritage Corridor.--
            (1) Reauthorization.--Section 106(b) of the Quinebaug and 
        Shetucket Rivers Valley National Heritage Corridor Act of 1994 
        (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; Public Law 103-449; 108 Stat. 4755; 113 
        Stat. 1728; 123 Stat. 1291; 128 Stat. 3802) is amended by 
        striking ``2021'' and inserting ``2036''.
            (2) Repeal of total funding cap.--Section 109(a) of the 
        Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley National Heritage 
        Corridor Act of 1994 (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; Public Law 103-
        449; 108 Stat. 4756; 113 Stat. 1729; 123 Stat. 1292) is amended 
        by striking the second sentence.
    (b) Upper Housatonic Valley National Heritage Area.--
            (1) Repeal of total funding cap.--Section 280A(a) of the 
        Upper Housatonic Valley National Heritage Area Act (54 U.S.C. 
        320101 note; Public Law 109-338; 120 Stat. 1819) is amended by 
        striking the second sentence.
            (2) Reauthorization.--Section 280B of the Upper Housatonic 
        Valley National Heritage Area Act (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; 
        Public Law 109-338; 120 Stat. 1819) is amended by striking ``15 
        years'' and inserting ``30 years''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
            (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                         TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


I, James C. Eckert, of OMNI Energy Services Corp., certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsectors (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), that:

(1)  the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
     2004 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully
     complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     OMNI Energy Services Corp.


Dated:  April 18, 2005


                                                  /s/ James C. Eckert
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                     James C. Eckert
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8156

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

JAMES EDWARD BROWN, a/k/a JB, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District 

Judge. (8:97-cr-00170-GRA-4) 

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 25, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

James Edward Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 James Edward Brown appeals the district court order 

denying his motion to reconsider the order denying his motion to 

reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We 

have reviewed the record and Brown’s contentions on appeal and 

find the district court did not abuse its discretion denying the 

motion. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th 

Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. See United States v. Brown, No. 8:97-cr00170-GRA-4 (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2008). We grant Brown’s motion to 

proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 12-0069 , 0070

Post-Focus Draft Revision 1 3/14/2012

ENGINEER: Hall \ BCS

PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

USE:

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt: Eng Controls: No special requirements under

ordinary conditions of use and| with adequate ventilation.

// Hand: Please observe the instructions regarding

permeability and breakthrough time which are provided by

the supplier of the gloves. Also take into consideration

the specific local conditions under which the product is

used, such as the danger of cuts, abrasion, and the

contact time. When handling hot material, use heat

resistant gloves. // Eye: safety glasses // Skin and Body:

long sleeved clothing.

Respirator: None listed

Health Effects: Caution - this is a research sample and

the toxicological and ecotoxicological properties have

not been fully evaluated.

TLV/PEL:

none established

@=

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns) (12/09/2011):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Ecotox Analogs:

Migration to groundwater: Rapid

PBT rating: P1B1T1 P12-0069: Health: 2, Eco: 2. //

P12-0070: Health 2, Eco: 3

Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 52 ppb for

P12-0069 and 4 ppb for P12-0070)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: NoINITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 12-0069 , 0070

USE:

Number of Sites/ Location: 1,000

unknown sites

Days/yr: 350

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

Water or Incineration or Landfill

High End: 3.8E-2 kg/site-day over 5 days/yr from 1,000

sites

or 1.9E+2 kg/yr

Incineration

Output 2: 2.6E-1 kg/site-day over 350 days/yr from 1,000

sites

or 9.0E+4 kg/yr

RELEASE TOTAL

9.0E+4 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARYm
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No.: 1:20-cv-23287-DPG 

LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

IMPERIAL BRANDS PLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO 

EXTEND DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTIONS TO 

NOVEMBER 28, 2023 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Extend 

Deadline for Response to Plaintiffs’ Objections to Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes’ 

November 28, 2023 Supplemental Report and Recommendation, and good cause appearing 

therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Unopposed Motion is GRANTED.

Defendants’ deadline to respond to the Objections is extended from December 26, 2023 to 

January 5, 2024.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, on this ____ day of December, 2023. 

____________________________________ 

The Honorable Darrin P. Gayles 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 348-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/19/2023 Page 1 of 1
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Region II

101 Marietta Street, Suite 2900

Atlanta, GA 30323

No. II-96-62 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contacts: Ken Clark 404-331-5503 (Wednesday, July 17, 1996)

Roger Hannah 404-331-7878

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $15,000 IN CIVIL

PENALTIES AGAINST COMPANY IN PUERTO RICO

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a total of

$15,000 in civil penalties against NDT Services, Inc. (NDTS) of

Caguas, Puerto Rico for violations of NRC requirements related to

the use of radiography equipment at an oil refinery in September

1993. The NRC staff believes the time elapsed since the incident

did not affect or modify the enforcement action.

The violations involved the failure of the company to use

people who were trained and qualified as radiographers under its NRC

license. This lack of training contributed to a situation in

September 1993 where the radioactive source in the radiographic

device could not be returned to its shielded position. There was no

overexposure, but the refinery had to be evacuated for several hours

and the incident raised significant regulatory concerns.

The company's Radiation Safety Officer (RSO) at that time also

failed to provide complete and accurate information to the NRC

during the course of the inspection. In the letter to the company,

NRC official Hugh Thompson writes that "the former RSO provided an

NRC inspector with written certification of the qualifications of

the two contract radiographers, dated September 3, 1993, which was

falsified following the September 4, 1993 event."

The former RSO also told an NRC inspector that he had

demonstrated the safe use of the equipment prior to the incident.

The NRC also obtained information that the former NDTS president

attempted to generate a false training record for the radiographers

involved.

Both the former RSO and former president are no longer employed

by NDTS and they have received NRC Orders prohibiting them from

engaging in NRC-licensed activities for a period of five years. In

addition, the company retained an outside firm to audit its

radiation safety program after the incident and subsequent

inspections have noted significant improvement in regulatory

compliance and safety.

The company has 30 days from receipt of the Notice of Violation

to either pay the civil penalty or to protest its imposition.
####
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-03-023 March 31, 2003

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

 

NRC TO MEET WITH DUKE ENERGY OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS SAFETY

PERFORMANCE AT OCONEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Duke Energy officials on

Thursday, April 3, to discuss the results of NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at the

Oconee nuclear power plant near Seneca, South Carolina.

The meeting will be held at 6:30 p.m. in the Shaver Complex (Recreation Center), 698 West

South 4th Street, in Seneca. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be

available before the conclusion of the meeting to answer any questions.

A letter from the NRC to Duke Energy addresses plant safety performance during the previous

year and forms the basis for the meeting discussions. The letter states that, overall, Oconee operated in

a manner that preserved public health and safety. The letter, which is available from Region II Public

Affairs and on the NRC web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/oco_2002q4.pdf , says Oconee Unit 2

maintained performance during the period at a level requiring no additional NRC oversight. A White

(low to moderate safety significance) inspection finding for Unit 2 related to inadequate installation of

some electrical connectors will require a supplemental NRC inspection. Oconee Unit 1 was the subject

of a supplemental inspection in late 2002. In addition, several issues at the Oconee plant are still under

NRC staff review and may warrant additional inspections.

NRC activities planned at Oconee include the Unit 2 supplemental inspection, special

inspections of planned reactor vessel head and steam generator replacements, a review of the

implementation of security measures required by the NRC, operator licensing examinations, routine

inspections of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation and an additional problem identification

and resolution inspection. 

 Current performance indicators for the three units at the Oconee plant are available at 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/OCO1/oco1_chart.html , 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/OCO2/oco2_chart.html and

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/OCO3/oco3_chart.html .

###