alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-027 March 13, 2001

PUBLIC INVITED TO OPEN HOUSE IN LAS VEGAS

WITH LOCAL NRC REPRESENTATIVES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission invites members of the public to an open house March 28

in Las Vegas with its on-site representatives to discuss NRC activities related to the possible future

nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain.

The three on-site representatives will be available for one-on-one discussions about their

oversight role now (while the Department of Energy is evaluating whether it will recommend that a

repository be built at Yucca Mountain) and later (if DOE submits an application to the NRC to build

and operate a repository there).

The open house will begin at 7:00 p.m. and continue until 9:00 p.m. at the Suncoast Hotel &

Casino, 9090 Alta Drive.

The on-site representatives are William L. Belke, Chad J. Glenn and Robert M. Latta. NRC

nuclear waste management officials from Rockville, Maryland, will also attend and be available to

address any questions from the public.

###
### §74a–1. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 87–367, title III, §302(c), Oct. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 793, provided that rate of gross annual compensation of Chief of Staff of Joint Committee on Internal Revenue Taxation was to be an amount equal to $17,500 as increased in the manner provided by sections 60e–8(d) and 60e–9(d) of this title. See section 4302 of this title.

A prior section 74a–1, act Aug. 5, 1955, ch. 568, §9, 69 Stat. 509, prescribed compensation of Chief of Staff of Joint Committee on Internal Revenue Taxation.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 742 

To modify the exemption for trade secrets and commercial or financial 

information in the Freedom of Information Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2021 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To modify the exemption for trade secrets and commercial 

or financial information in the Freedom of Information 

Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Open and Responsive 

5 Government Act of 2021’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 742 IS

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION 

2 ACT. 

3 Section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly 

4 known as the ‘‘Freedom of Information Act’’) is amend5 ed— 

6 (1) in subsection (b)(4), by inserting before the 

7 semicolon at the end the following: ‘‘, provided that 

8 the term ‘confidential’ means information that, if 

9 disclosed, would likely cause substantial harm to the 

10 competitive position of the person from whom the in11 formation was obtained’’; and 

12 (2) in subsection (d)— 

13 (A) by striking ‘‘This section does not au14 thorize withholding of information’’ and insert15 ing ‘‘This section— 

16 ‘‘(1) does not authorize the withholding of in17 formation’’; 

18 (B) in paragraph (1), as so designated, by 

19 striking ‘‘. This section is not authority to with20 hold information from Congress.’’ and inserting 

21 a semicolon; and 

22 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

23 ‘‘(2) does not authorize the withholding of a 

24 portion of an otherwise responsive record on the 

25 basis that the portion is non-responsive; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 742 IS

1 ‘‘(3) is not authority to withhold information 

2 from Congress.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.452 What are the requirements of PLP loan processing? ( a ) Subparts A and B of this part govern the making of PLP loans, except for the following: ( 1 ) Certain types of businesses, loans, and loan programs are not eligible for PLP, as detailed in published SBA policy and procedures.
( 2 ) A Lender may not make a PLP business loan which reduces its existing credit exposure for any Borrower, except in cases where an interim loan(s) has been made for other than real estate construction purposes to the Borrower which was approved by the Lender within 90 days of receipt of the issuance fo a subsequent PLP loan number.
( 3 ) SBA will not guarantee more than the specified statutory percentage of any PLP loan.
( b ) A PLP Lender notifies SBA of its approval of a PLP loan by submitting to SBA's loan processing center appropriate documentation signed by two of the PLP's authorized representatives. SBA will attach the SBA guarantee and notify the PLP Lender of the SBA loan number (if it does not identify a problem with eligibility, and funds are available).
( c ) The PLP Lender is responsible for all PLP loan decisions regarding eligibility (including size) and creditworthiness. The PLP Lender is also responsible for confirming that all PLP loan closing decisions are correct, and that it has complied with all requirements of law and SBA regulations.
§ 12.1 Cooperation with certain agencies; joint regulations. ( a ) *Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.* The importation into the United States of food, drugs, devices, cosmetics, and tobacco products as defined in section 201 (f), (g), (h), and (i) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321 (f), (g), (h), (i)) is governed by section 801 of the Act, as amended (21 U.S.C. 381) and regulations issued under authority of section 701(b) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 371(b)) by the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary of the Treasury (21 CFR 1.83 through 1.99).
( b ) *Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.* The importation of pesticides and devices is governed by section 17(c) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. 136 o (c)), and regulations issued under the authority of section 17(e) of that Act (7 U.S.C. 1360(e)) by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, as set forth below (§ 12.110 *et seq.*).
( c ) *Federal Hazardous Substances Act.* The importation of hazardous substances, misbranded hazardous substances, or banned hazardous substances as defined in section 2 of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act, as amended (15 U.S.C. 1261), is governed by regulations issued under the authority of sections 10(b) and 14 of the Act, as amended (15 U.S.C. 1269, 1273), by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (16 CFR 1500.265 through 1500.272).
[T.D. 68-191, 33 FR 11019, Aug. 2, 1968, as amended by T.D. 75-194, 40 FR 32321, Aug. 1, 1975; T.D. 82-145, 47 FR 35475, Aug. 16, 1982; CBP Dec. 10-29, 75 FR 52450, Aug. 26, 2010]
Order entered October 12 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00201
- CV KIMBERLY GOMEZ, Appellant

V. SHAHRAM N. SANI, M.D., ET AL., Appellee s On Appeal from t he 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 17
- 17417

ORDER On September 8, 2020, appellant informed the Court she had finalized settlement with appellees EmCare Holdings, Inc., Poppy Drive Inpatient Services, P.L.L.C., Farah Masood, M.D., and Shahram Sani, M.D. , and the settlement was expected to fund that week. Appellant also informed the Court she was unable to settle her claims with the remaining appellees

. B ased on appellant’s status report, we ordered appellant to file a motion to dismiss the appeal as to the settl ingappellees no later than September 21, 2020 and her brief as to the remaining

appellees no later than October 12, 2020. Before the Court is appellant’s October 7, 2020 status update and unopposed

mo tion for extension of time to file her brief. Appellant informs the Court the settl ing appellees “have yet to fund the settlement , ” and she “has no choice but to move forward with efforts to enforce the settlement agreement in the trial court.”
Because of this and other matters, she seeks a thirty

- day extension of time to file her brief as to the remaining appellees.
We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief as to the remaining appellees be filed no later than November 12, 2020. We further ORDER a ppellant to file, no later than October 27 , 2020, a letter brief demonstrating a live controversy remains as to the merits of the appeal with the settling appellees such that the appeal as to them should not be dismissed as moot

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3( a) ; Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hughes , 827 S.W.2d 859, 859 (Tex. 2001) (per curiam) (appeal becomes moot if controversy between parties ceases to exist due to settlement).
/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Studies by the U.S. Geological Survey in Alaska, 2006

##### U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1739-D

# Sedimentology and Sequence Stratigraphy of the Lower Cretaceous Fortress Mountain and Torok Formations Exposed Along the Siksikpuk River, North-Central Alaska

### *By* David W. Houseknecht, Christopher J. Schenk, and Marwan A. Wartes

### 2007

Chronostratigraphic column for the Colville foreland basin, northern Alaska, showing nomenclature and ages of strata of the Brookian sequence. (from Figure 2)

**Abstract**

An exposure of the Lower Cretaceous Fortress Mountain and Torok Formations along the Siksikpuk River in north-central Alaska provides a rare opportunity to observe the stratigraphic contact between these two formations and to interpret the depositional facies and sequence stratigraphy of the exposed strata. The Fortress Mountain Formation at the base of the measured section includes braided-fluvial and coastal-plain facies deposited in a lowstand-systems tract, and an overlying succession of mostly shallow marine facies deposited in the basal part of a transgressive-systems tract. The overlying Torok Formation includes a thick, upward-deepening succession of marine-shelf to marine-slope facies deposited in the upper part of the transgressive-systems tract. The upper part of the section includes marine-slope and incised-slope-channel turbidite deposits of the Torok Formation, interpreted as a highstand-systems tract.

Consideration of the balance between accommodation and sediment flux inferred from the sequence-stratigraphic analysis suggests that both tectonics and eustasy may have influenced deposition of the lowstand-systems and transgressive-systems tracts. In contrast, the highstand-systems tract may have been primarily influenced by progradation of a regional sediment-dispersal system and by subsidence induced by sediment loading.

----

Download the text of this report as a 20-page PDF file (pp1739d_text.pdf; 74.6 MB)

Download the plate for this report as a 40" x 36" PDF file:  *Composite Stratigraphic Section, Gamma-Ray Profile, and Photographs of Parts of the Lower Cretaceous Fortress Mountain and Torok Formations Exposed along the Siksikpuk River, North-Central Alaska (lat 68.531° n., long 152.055° w.)* (pp1739d_plate1.pdf; 183 MB)

For questions about the content of this report, contact Dave Houseknecht

Suggested citation and version history

Back to *Studies by the U.S. Geological Survey in Alaska, 2006*

----

Download a free copy of the current version of Adobe Reader.

| Help   | PDF help   | Western reports main page | Western Professional Papers || Geologic   Division | Alaska Science Center   |  Western Energy Resources   |

----

This report is available only on the Web

----

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey	URL: https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/pp1739/d/	Page Contact Information: Michael Diggles	Page Last Modified: December 14, 2007

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of LSB Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year
ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, John E. Sharland, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as added by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of the Company. Date: March 18, 2005 /s/ John E. SharlandJohn E. SharlandSenior Vice President
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000895516
<NAME>                        GREG MANNING AUCTIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         435923
<SECURITIES>                                   592150
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6229956
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (396750)
<INVENTORY>                                    3076163
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12459094
<PP&E>                                         1420971
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (817196)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 15994845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8724177
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       44200
<OTHER-SE>                                     7058222
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   15994845
<SALES>                                        4946870
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6474571
<CGS>                                          3786402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3745011
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               153750
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             468689
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1262264)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (452375)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (809889)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (809889)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.18)
        


</TABLE>
01,GO/ 4— I , Z.J4 1- 1V1 LJG11110 IV111,110C1 .111,1 I 1115 piel/14515515.5J1 1 

Wally 

Feb 1, 2021, 4:36 PM 

Tim Mekosh 

I know walley hates shay 

Feb 1, 2021, 4:36 PM 

Tim Mekosh 

What is it 

Feb 1, 2021, 4:35 PM 

Tim Mekosh 

I sent to him in a private chat that he choose to post 

Feb 1, 2021, 4:35 PM 

Dame Michael 

That's the repost, i thought he reposted the kkm letter 

Feb 1, 2021, 4:35 PM 

Chuck Bradley 

Does he know that? 

Feb 1, 2021, 4:35 PM 

Tim Mekosh 

Probably me 

Feb 1, 2021, 4:35 PM 

Chuck Bradley 

Who made the mime? 

Feb 1, 2021, 4:34 PM 

file:///ClUsers/HaganW/Desktop/amessage_thtml 24/211 

SCI 000677 CONFIDENTIAL

Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-143 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0566 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. AUSTIN JOSEPH SCHNEIDERHAHN,

Defendant and Appellant.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an ext ension of time to and including December 8 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 1 2021

11/01/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0566
§ 145.75 Liability for civil penalties. ( a ) ( 1 ) Violation of § 145.74(g) after December 31, 2020, will result in USPS being liable for penalties in accordance with the provisions of 19 U.S.C. 1436(e)(1).
( 2 ) The amount of the penalty will be $5,000 per violation.
( b ) The penalty will be reduced or dismissed based on the factors specified in 19 U.S.C. 1436(e)(2).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3594]

In accordance with a notice received from the Department of Homeland Security—Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective October 13, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to reopen the filing period for this disaster. The new deadline for filing applications for physical damage is November 8, 2004.

In addition, this amendment hereby establishes the incident period as beginning May 7, 2004 and continuing through July 3, 2004.

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.*, the deadline for filing applications for economic injury is March 21, 2005.                

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008)

Dated: October 14, 2004.

Cheri L. Cannon,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 04-23637 Filed 10-21-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Doug Longhini, Plaintiff,

v.

17070 Collins Avenue Shopping 

Center, Ltd. and others, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 20-61359-Civ-Scola

Order Granting Joint Motion For Approval Of

Settlement And For Dismissal

This matter is before the Court upon the Plaintiff and Ross Dress for Less 

Inc.’s joint motion for approval of settlement and for dismissal. (ECF No. 81.) 

The Court has reviewed the parties’ settlement agreement and being advised 

that the parties’ settlement expressly requires the Court’s approval and 

retention of jurisdiction as a condition precedent to the effectiveness of such 

agreement, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that:

1. The Court has reviewed and approves the settlement agreement 

(ECF No. 81-1) entered into by the Plaintiff and the Defendant, Ross Dress for 

Less Inc., and directs the parties to comply with its terms;

2. The Court retains jurisdiction over this matter for the purpose of 

enforcing the settlement agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, 

Ross Dress for Less Inc.; and

3. Subject only to the foregoing reservation of jurisdiction, this action 

is otherwise dismissed with prejudice as to Ross Dress for Less Inc. with no 

award of fees or costs to either party.

Done and ordered at Miami, Florida on November 24, 2020.

____________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 0:20-cv-61359-RNS Document 82 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/25/2020 Page 1 of 1
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-00-73 December 29, 2000

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC STAFF DETERMINES VIOLATION AT SUMMER NUCLEAR

PLANT TO BE OF LOW TO MODERATE SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has determined that a violation of NRC regulations

at the South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Summer nuclear plant, near Jenkinsville, South

Carolina, should be characterized as White, meaning that it is an issue with low to moderate

importance to safety but one which may require additional NRC inspections.

The violation, involving the Summer plant’s steam-driven emergency feedwater pump being

inoperable during power operation for about 48 days, had preliminarily been characterized by the NRC

staff as Yellow (an issue with substantial importance to safety), but risk information provided by the

company and evaluated by the NRC staff led to the change in safety significance.

Under the significance determination process, NRC officials classify certain conditions at

nuclear power plants as being in one of four colors which delineate increasing levels of severity,

beginning with green and progressing in severity to white, yellow or red. The Summer plant has two

electric motor-driven emergency feedwater pumps, and another which is steam-driven, for use in the

event of an interruption in the normal feedwater flow to the unit’s three steam generators. Although no

abnormal conditions occurred during the period in question, had there been a loss of feedwater and

both of the electric motor-driven pumps, use of the steam-driven pump would have been important in

removing heat from the reactor’s uranium fuel.

Because this violation falls into the regulatory response band of the NRC’s oversight process,

the Summer plant may be subject to increased NRC oversight such as additional meetings or

inspections. The agency will determine the most appropriate response and notify SCE&G when that

determination has been made.

###
§ 122.62 Aircraft not otherwise required to clear. ( a ) *Bureau of the Census.* Under Bureau of the Census Regulations (15 CFR part 30), aircraft not required to clear by § 122.61 shall obtain permission to depart if carrying merchandise from the U.S. to Puerto Rico or from Puerto Rico to the U.S.
( b ) *Bureau of Industry and Security.* Aircraft leaving the U.S. for a foreign area must be cleared by Customs if a validated license from the Bureau of Industry and Security (Department of Commerce) is required for the aircraft under the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR parts 730 through 774). Aircraft are not required to clear if the Secretary of Commerce issues a permit allowing departure without clearance.
( c ) *Department of State.* Aircraft not covered by Export Administration Regulations are subject to the Department of State export licensing authority as set out in 22 CFR parts 121 and 123. Such aircraft may depart from the U.S. only with the proper Department of State license.
[T.D. 88-12, 53 FR 9292, Mar. 22, 1988, as amended by T.D. 93-61, 58 FR 41425, Aug. 4, 1993; CBP Dec. 04-28, 69 FR 52599, Aug. 27, 2004; 69 FR 54179, Sept. 2, 2004]
#### Doris Schwarz, Appellant, v. Isaac J. Danziger, Respondent.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.