alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

61 Forsyth Street, Suite 23T85

Atlanta, GA 30303

No: II-99-48 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Ken Clark or Roger Hannah (Wednesday, September 15, 1999)

NRC CONTINUES TO MONITOR HURRICANE FLOYD

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is continuing to monitor storm preparations at nuclear

plants in the southeast as Hurricane Floyd moves north-northwest along the Atlantic coast.

NRC Region II staffed its Incident Response Center in Atlanta Tuesday and began monitoring the path of

the storm and what nuclear plants might potentially be affected.

Early Wednesday morning, Florida Power & Light’s St. Lucie nuclear plant on the east coast of Florida

exited its Notification of Unusual Event, declared Monday due to a hurricane warning issued for the area,

after the threat of the storm passed and the warning was lifted.

Carolina Power & Light’s Brunswick nuclear plant, near Southport, NC, declared an Unusual Event late

Tuesday evening when hurricane warnings were issued for that area. CP&L began shutting down both

units at the Brunswick plant this morning because of projected wind speeds in excess of 73 miles per hour

for that area when Hurricane Floyd arrives.

The safe operation of nuclear plants during any event, including hurricanes, remains the responsibility of

the company licensed to operate the plant. The NRC's role is to monitor events for compliance with safety

procedures and advise the operator if necessary.

###
### §2211. Establishment

There is established within the Office of the Architect of the Capitol the Office of the Capitol Visitor Center (in this chapter referred to as the "Office"), to be headed by the Chief Executive Officer for Visitor Services (in this chapter referred to as the "Chief Executive Officer").

(Pub. L. 110–437, title II, §201, Oct. 20, 2008, 122 Stat. 4986.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 110–437, Oct. 20, 2008, 122 Stat. 4983, known as the Capitol Visitor Center Act of 2008, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2201 of this title and Tables.
###### Editorial Note on Part 159

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93023, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 159.51 General.

Liquidation of entries shall be suspended only when provided by law or regulation, or when directed by the Commissioner of Customs. Liquidation of entries shall not be suspended simply because issues involved therein may be before the Customs Court in pending litigation, since the importer may seek relief by protesting the entries after liquidation.
|Exhibit 23Independent AuditorsConsent


Consent of
Independent Auditors



The Board of Directors Alliance
Bancorp of New England, Inc.:



We consent to incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements (No. 333-39645 and No. 333-89869) on
Form S-8 of Alliance Bancorp of New England, Inc. of our report dated January
29, 2002 on the consolidated balance sheets of Alliance Bancorp of New England,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related
consolidated income statements, consolidated statements of changes in
shareholders equity and consolidated statements of cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, which report appears
in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Alliance Bancorp of New
England, Inc.


/s/KPMG LLP Hartford,
ConnecticutMarch 4, 2002
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---

---

Exhibit 15.1

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTRERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-156686) of
our reports dated April 27, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Formula Systems
(1985) Ltd. included in this annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2008.

| |  | /s/ Ziv Haft

Ziv Haft
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
BDO Member Firm
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
#### § 12.31 Plant pests.

The importation in a live state of insects which are injurious to cultivated crops, including vegetables, field crops, bush fruits, and orchard, forest or shade trees, and of the eggs, pupae, or larvae of such insects, except for scientific purposes under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Agriculture, is prohibited. All packages containing live insects or their eggs, pupae, or larvae arriving from abroad, unless accompanied by a permit issued by the Department of Agriculture, shall be detained and submitted to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs of that Department for inspection and determination of their admissibility into the United States.

[28 FR 14710, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 78-99, 43 FR 13060, Mar. 29, 1978; T.D. 82-145, 47 FR 35476, Aug. 16, 1982; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51253, Dec. 21, 1988]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 4, 2012

t0827

Order 

September 4, 2012

145201

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145201

COA: 302017 

Wayne CC: 10-007922-FH

JESSE LAWERENCE HOLT, a/k/a JESSE

LAWRENCE HOLT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 10, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

cases of Florida v Jardines, cert gtd 132 S Ct 995; 181 L Ed 2d 726; 2012 US LEXIS 7; 

80 USLW 3392 (USSC Docket No. 11-564), and Florida v Harris, cert gtd 132 S Ct 

1796; 182 L Ed 2d 615; 2012 US LEXIS 2335; 80 USLW 3545 (2012) (USSC Docket 

No. 11-817), are pending on appeal before the United States Supreme Court and that the 

decisions in those cases may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to 

appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decisions in 

those cases.
### Part A—Adult Training Program
### §1906. Construction; effect on agreements

This chapter shall not be construed as modifying or affecting any agreement between the Department of Education or any other department or agency of the United States and the Helen Keller Services for the Blind, Incorporated, or any successor to or assignee of such corporation, with respect to the Center.

(Pub. L. 98–221, title II, §207, Feb. 22, 1984, 98 Stat. 34; Pub. L. 102–569, title IX, §906, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4483.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–569 substituted "Helen Keller Services for the Blind, Incorporated" for "Industrial Home for the Blind, Incorporated".
#### In the Matter of Berlandis Holding Corp., Appellant. Giles Tory, Respondent.

Order unanimously modified by increasing the fair and reasonable rent for the premises under review to $2,100 per annum and as so modified affirmed, with costs and disbursements to the appellant. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
----

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1) (2)

(2005/C 256/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

LITHUANIA

Operating licences granted

Category B:   Operating licences including the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

----

(1)OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.

(2)  Communicated to the European Commission before 31.8.2005.

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-cv-23253-BLOOM/Louis

JAMES R. WRIGHT, D.M.D., P.S.C., 

and WRIGHT DENTAL CENTER, PLLC,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES 

GROUP, INC., HARTFORD CASUALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY, and TWIN 

CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, ECF No. [37] 

(“Notice”), filed on October 13, 2020. The Court has carefully reviewed the Notice and the record, 

and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

as follows:

1. The Notice, ECF No. [37] is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The above-styled case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

3. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs;

4. To the extent not otherwise disposed of, all pending motions are DENIED AS

MOOT and all deadlines are TERMINATED;

5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

Case 1:20-cv-23253-BB Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2020 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 20-cv-23253-BLOOM/Louis

2

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on October 13, 2020.

_________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-23253-BB Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2020 Page 2 of 2
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-050 August 8, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC DISCRIMINATION TASK GROUP TO HOLD MEETING IN WATERFORD, CONN.

Public comments on proposals to improve the Nuclear Regulatory Commissionís handling of

discrimination concerns will be accepted by members of an NRC task group at a public meeting

scheduled for Tuesday, Aug. 14, in Waterford, Conn. The session will take place from 7 to 9 p.m. at

Waterford Town Hall, 15 Rope Ferry Road, Waterford.

The NRC formed a Discrimination Task Group in April 2000 to evaluate and improve the

agencyís processes used in the handling of discrimination allegations made by nuclear industry

workers. The task group subsequently prepared a draft report containing about 40 proposed

recommendations. A copy of the report can be found at www.nrc.gov/OE, under the link for the

Discrimination Task Group.

To obtain public feedback on the proposals, the task group is holding a series of public

meetings across the country, including the session in Waterford. At the conclusion of the meetings, the

task group will develop final recommendations for consideration by the NRC Commission. 

Those members of the public who are unable to attend the Waterford meeting but who would

like to offer comments on the draft report can submit them by Aug. 17 to the NRCís Office of

Enforcement web site, at www.nrc.gov/OE, or in writing to Barry Westreich, Office of Enforcement,

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 20555-0001.

###
#### § 402.6 Relation to Transportation Order T-2.

Transportation Order T-1 applies to the transportation of commodities to, or in transit to, destinations in Sub-Group A, Hong Kong or Macao. It applies, however, only to commodities on the Positive List of the Office of International Trade, arms and ammunition, and commodities controlled under the Atomic Energy Act (see section 2 of this interpretation). Transportation Order T-2 applies to the transportation of commodities of any kind which are destined to Communist China (Order T-2 also prohibits American ships and aircraft from calling at any port or place in Communist China). Since Communist China is in Sub-Group A, the restrictions of both orders apply to the transportation of commodities to Communist China or to any other point in transit to Communist China.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER N. URBANO,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 169 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of October, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 520 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to modify a 

provision relating to acquisition of beach fill. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2 (legislative day, MARCH 1), 2021 

Mr. RUBIO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 

to modify a provision relating to acquisition of beach fill. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sand Acquisition, 

5 Nourishment, and Development Act’’ or the ‘‘SAND Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ACQUISITION OF BEACH FILL. 

7 Section 935 of the Water Resources Development Act 

8 of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2299) is amended by striking ‘‘if such 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 520 IS

1 materials are not available from domestic sources for envi2 ronmental or economic reasons’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### § 208.32 Definitions of terms used in this subpart.

*Affiliated Personnel* means individuals not normally employed by a Sponsoring Agency or Participating Agency and individuals normally affiliated with a Sponsoring Agency or Participating Agency as volunteers.

*Demobilization Order* means a DHS communication that terminates an Alert or Activation and identifies cost and time allowances for rehabilitation.

*Exempt* means any System Member who is exempt from the requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201 *et seq.,* pertaining to overtime compensation and other labor standards.

*Maximum Pay Rate Table* means the DHS-issued table that identifies the maximum pay rates for selected System positions that may be used for reimbursement of Affiliated Personnel compensation and Backfill for Activated System Members employed by or otherwise associated with a for-profit Participating Agency. The Maximum Pay Rate Table does not apply to a System member whom a Sponsoring Agency or Participating Agency employs.

*Mobilization* means the process of assembling equipment and personnel in response to an Alert or Activation.

*Non-Exempt* means any System Member who is covered by 29 U.S.C. 201 *et seq.*

*Rehabilitation* means the process of returning personnel and equipment to a pre-incident state of readiness after DHS terminates an Activation.
#### § 80.7 General.

A project involving property acquisition or the relocation of structures for open space is eligible for hazard mitigation assistance only if the subapplicant meets the pre-award requirements set forth in this subpart. A project may not be framed in a manner that has the effect of circumventing the requirements of this subpart.
Exhibit 15.4



[Verstegen accountants en adviseurs Letterhead]



To the board of directors and shareholders of

Magic Benelux B.V.

Pelmolen 17

3994 XX HOUTEN



Dordrecht, May 13, 2013



Ref.: KH/VK/347100.10/JV



Dear Sirs,



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-156686) of our report dated January 28, 2011 with respect to the
financial statements of Magic Benelux B.V. as of December 31, 2010, included in this annual report of
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012.



On behalf of Verstegen accountants en adviseurs,



|/s/ Drs. L.K. Hoogendoorn RA MGA | 
|-------------------------------- | 
|Drs. L.K. Hoogendoorn RA MGA.    |
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

No. III-00-42 July 20, 2000

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT MONTICELLO NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Lisle, Illinois, have announced the assignment of

Dan Kimble as the agency’s Resident Inspector at the Monticello Nuclear Power Plant in Monticello,

Minnesota.

Kimble began his duties with the NRC on July 17. Prior to joining the NRC, Kimble worked

at the Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge site in Tennessee as an operations engineer at the High Flux

Isotope Reactor. Prior to that position, he worked as an operator and engineer for: Consumers Energy

at the Palisades, Michigan, nuclear power plant; Public Service Electric and Gas Co. at the Salem, New

Jersey, plant; and Wisconsin Electric Power Co. at the Point Beach, Wisconsin, plant.

Kimble has a bachelor’s degree in nuclear engineering from Northwestern University in

Chicago. He is a member of the American Nuclear Society and is a licensed professional engineer in

Michigan and Tennessee. He lives in Big Lake, Minnesota.

Kimble joins Senior Resident Inspector Steve Burton at Monticello. They can be reached at the

Monticello plant at (763) 295-2066.

# #
### §391. Certification and filing of depositions

#### (a) Sealing of papers; deposit with clerk

The officer before whom any deposition is taken shall certify thereon that the witness was duly sworn by him and that the deposition is a true record of the testimony given by the witness. He shall then securely seal the deposition, together with any papers produced by the witness and the notice of deposition or stipulation, if the deposition was taken without notice, in an envelope endorsed with the title of the contested election case and marked "Deposition of (here insert name of witness)" and shall within thirty days after completion of the witness' testimony, file it with the Clerk.

#### (b) Notification of filing

After filing the deposition, the officer shall promptly notify the parties of its filing.

#### (c) Copy of deposition to parties or deponents

Upon payment of reasonable charges therefor, not to exceed the charges allowed in the district court of the United States for the district wherein the place of examination is located, the officer shall furnish a copy of deposition to any party or the deponent.

(Pub. L. 91–138, §12, Dec. 5, 1969, 83 Stat. 289.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to any general or special election for Representative in, or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress of the United States occurring after Dec. 5, 1969, see section 19 of Pub. L. 91–138, set out as a note under section 381 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 203 (Thursday, October 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23536]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--The Telecommunications Industry Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 12, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), The Telecommunications 
Industry Association (``TIA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: The 
Telecommunications Industry Association, Arlington, VA. The nature and 
scope of TIA's standards development activities are: TIA is accredited 
by the American National Standards Institute (``ANSI'') to develop 
voluntary industry standards for a wide variety of telecommunications 
products. TIA's Standards and Technology Department is composed of five 
divisions which sponsor more than 70 standards-setting formulating 
groups in Fiber Optics, User Premises Equipment, Network Equipment, 
Wireless Communications and Satellite Communications.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-23536 Filed 10-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 12.3 Release under bond; liquidated damages. ( a ) *Release.* No food, drug, device, cosmetic , tobacco product, pesticide, hazardous substance or dangerous caustic or corrosive substance that is the subject of § 12.1 will be released except in accordance with the laws and regulations applicable to the merchandise. When any merchandise that is the subject of § 12.1 is to be released under bond pursuant to regulations applicable to that merchandise, a bond on Customs Form 301, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.62 of this chapter, will be required.
( b ) *Bond amount.* The bond referred to in paragraph (a) of this section must be in a specific amount prescribed by the port director based on the circumstances of the particular case that is either: ( 1 ) Equal to the domestic value (see § 162.43(a) of this chapter) of the merchandise at the time of release as if the merchandise were admissible and otherwise in compliance; or
( 2 ) Equal to three times the value of the merchandise as provided in § 113.62(n)(1) of this chapter.
( c ) *Liquidated damages.* Whenever liquidated damages arise with regard to any food, drug, device or cosmetic subject to § 12.1(a) for failure to redeliver merchandise into Customs custody or for failure to rectify any noncompliance with the applicable provisions of admission, including the failure to export or destroy the merchandise within the time period prescribed by law after the merchandise has been refused admission pursuant to the provisions of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, those liquidated damages will be assessed pursuant to § 113.62(n)(1) of this chapter in the amount of the bond prescribed under paragraph (b) of this section.
[T.D. 01-26, 66 FR 16853, Mar. 28, 2001; CBP Dec. 08-46, 73 FR 71780, Nov. 25, 2008; CBP Dec. 10-29, 75 FR 52451, Aug. 26, 2010; CBP Dec. 18-05, 83 FR 27404, June 12, 2018]