alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1724. Responsibilities of Board

#### (a) Review and recommendation of nominations for National Recording Registry

#### (1) In general

The Board shall review nominations of sound recordings submitted to it for inclusion in the National Recording Registry and advise the Librarian, as provided in subchapter I, with respect to the inclusion of such recordings in the Registry and the preservation of these and other sound recordings that are culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant.

#### (2) Source of nominations

The Board shall consider for inclusion in the National Recording Registry nominations submitted by the general public as well as representatives of sound recording archives and the sound recording industry (such as the guilds and societies representing sound recording artists) and other creative artists.

#### (b) Study and report on sound recording preservation and restoration

The Board shall conduct a study and issue a report on the following issues:

(1) The current state of sound recording archiving, preservation and restoration activities.

(2) Taking into account the research and other activities carried out by or on behalf of the National Audio-Visual Conservation Center at Culpeper, Virginia—

(A) the methodology and standards needed to make the transition from analog "open reel" preservation of sound recordings to digital preservation of sound recordings; and

(B) standards for access to preserved sound recordings by researchers, educators, and other interested parties.

(3) The establishment of clear standards for copying old sound recordings (including equipment specifications and equalization guidelines).

(4) Current laws and restrictions regarding the use of archives of sound recordings, including recommendations for changes in such laws and restrictions to enable the Library of Congress and other nonprofit institutions in the field of sound recording preservation to make their collections available to researchers in a digital format.

(5) Copyright and other laws applicable to the preservation of sound recordings.

(Pub. L. 106–474, title I, §124, Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2089.)
§ 122.188 Issuance of temporary Customs access seal. ( a ) *Conditions for issuance.* When an approved Customs access seal is required under § 122.182(a) of this part and the port director determines that the application cannot be administratively processed in a reasonable period of time, an employer may, upon written request, be issued a temporary Customs access seal for his employee. The employer must satisfy the port director that a hardship would result if the request is not granted. Surety on the bond, as required by § 122.182(c), may be waived in the discretion of the port director but only for the period of the temporary Customs access seal and its renewal period.
( b ) *Validation period.* The temporary Customs access seal shall be valid for a period of 60 days. The port director may renew the temporary Customs access seal for additional 30 day periods where the circumstances under which the temporary Customs access seal was originally issued continue to exist. The temporary Customs access seal shall be destroyed by the port director when the permanent approved Customs access seal is issued, or the privileges granted thereby are withdrawn.
( c ) *Temporary employees and official visitors.* The provisions of this section shall also apply to temporary employees and official visitors requiring access to the Customs security area. In the case of temporary employees, the Customs access seal shall be valid for a period of 30 days. In the case of official visitors, the temporary Customs access seal shall be valid for the day of issuance only. Temporary employee and official visitor Customs access seal are renewable for periods equal to their original period of validity.
( d ) *Revocation of denial and access.* The temporary Customs access seal may be revoked and access to the Customs security area denied at any time if the holder of the temporary Customs access seal refuses or neglects to obey any proper order of a Customs officer, or any Customs order, rule, or regulation, or if, in the judgment of the port director, continuation of the privileges granted thereby would endanger the revenue or pose a threat to the Customs security area.
[T.D. 90-82, 55 FR 42557, Oct. 22, 1990, as amended by T.D. 02-40, 67 FR 48988, July 29, 2002]
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/06

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 06 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
§ 133.31 Recordation of copyrighted works. ( a ) *Eligible works.* Claims to copyright which have been registered in accordance with the Copyright Act of July 30, 1947, as amended, or the Copyright Act of 1976, as amended, may be recorded with Customs for import protection.
( b ) *Persons eligible to record.* The copyright owner, including any person who has acquired copyright ownership through an exclusive license, assignment, or otherwise, and claims actual or potential injury because of actual or contemplated importations of copies (or phonorecords) of eligible works, may file an application to record a copyright. “Copyright owner,” with respect to any one of the exclusive rights comprised in a copyright, refers to the owner of that particular right.
( c ) *Notice of recordation and other action.* Applicants and recordants will be notified of the approval or denial of an application filed in accordance with § 133.32, § 133.35, § 133.36, or § 133.37.
[T.D. 72-266, 37 FR 20678, Oct. 3, 1972, as amended by T.D. 73-212, 38 FR 21397, Aug. 8, 1973; T.D. 87-40, 52 FR 9474, Mar. 25, 1987]
#### § 111.52 Voluntary suspension of license or permit.

The appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade, may accept a broker's written voluntary offer of suspension of the broker's license or permit for a specific period of time under any terms and conditions to which the parties may agree.

[T.D. 00-17, 65 FR 13891, Mar. 15, 2000, as amended by CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63319, Oct. 18, 2022]
Case 0:00-cr-06218-NCR Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/14/2002 Page 1 of 2
Case 0:00-cr-06218-NCR Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/14/2002 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 232 (Friday, December 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 87036-87037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29010]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9030-5]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 11/21/2016 Through 11/25/2016
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20160283, Final, NPS, FL, ADOPTION--Central Everglades Planning 
Program, Review Period

[[Page 87037]]

Ends: 01/03/2017, Contact: Robert Johnson 305-244-4235.

    The U.S. Department of the Interior's National Park Service (NPS) 
is adopting the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Final EIS #20140215, filed 
with EPA 07/31/2014. The NPS was not a cooperating agency for this 
project. Therefore, recirculation of the document is necessary under 
Section 1506.3(b) of Council on Environmental Quality Regulations.

EIS No. 20160284, Draft, TVA, TN, Multiple Reservoir Land Management 
Plans, Comment Period Ends: 01/31/2017, Contact: Matthew Higdon 865-
632-8051.

    Dated: November 29, 2016.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2016-29010 Filed 12-1-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### § 312.9 Matching share requirements.

The required matching share of a project's eligible costs may consist of cash or in-kind contribution(s) whose value can be readily determined, verified, and justified. Applicants must show at the time of application that the matching share is committed to the project, will be available as needed, and is not or will not be conditioned or encumbered in any way that would preclude its use consistent with the requirements of the investment assistance. EDA shall determine at its sole discretion whether the matching share documentation adequately addresses the requirements of this section.
Exhibit 31.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer


pursuant to Section 302 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, W. Bruce Comer III, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Allegro Biodiesel Corporation;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





/s/ W. Bruce Comer IIIName: W. Bruce Comer IIITitle: Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)





August 12, 2009
### §5304. Salaries of Representatives, Delegates, and Resident Commissioners elected for unexpired terms

The salaries of Representatives in Congress, Delegates from Territories, and Resident Commissioners, elected for unexpired terms, shall commence on the date of their election and not before.

(July 16, 1914, ch. 141, §1, 38 Stat. 458.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 37 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-01-021 June 21, 2001 

 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov 

NRC PROPOSES $3,000 FINE AGAINST PUERTO RICO COMPANY

FOR VIOLATION OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $3,000 civil penalty against Turabo

Corporation of Caguas, Puerto Rico, for violations of NRC safety requirements related to the storage of

licensed radioactive material.

NRC inspectors conducted an inspection on April 17 of this year, at the companyís Caguas

facility and at temporary job sites near Caguas and Cieba. They found that the company had failed to

maintain required control or constant surveillance of licensed radioactive material. The inspection

found that a storage room housing two portable soil moisture density gauges, each containing about

eight millicuries of cesium-137 and 50 millicuries of americium-241, was unlocked and not under

constant surveillance.

NRC officials said the potential existed for unauthorized access to the gauges while they were

improperly secured but that no radioactive material was lost. 

The NRC staff held a predecisional enforcement conference with company officials in Atlanta

prior to proposing the civil penalty and says that adequate corrective actions have been taken. 

 The company has 30 days in which to either pay the penalty or to protest its imposition.

###
Case 9:20-cv-81300-DMM Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2021 Page 1 of 3
Case 9:20-cv-81300-DMM Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2021 Page 2 of 3
Case 9:20-cv-81300-DMM Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2021 Page 3 of 3
|EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.
333-47122 and 333-44260), Form S-8/A (Nos. 33-52478 and 33-80952) and Form S-4
(Nos. 333-36387 and 333-61221) of Building Materials Holding Corporation of our
report dated March 6, 2003 relating to the financial statements, which appears
in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our
report dated March 6, 2003 relating to the financial statement schedule, which
appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


San Francisco, CaliforniaMarch 26,
2003
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marque MESSIAH, a/k/a Sandman, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-6396.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 28, 2002.

Marque Messiah, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Office of the United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Marque Messiah seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West *370Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *United States v. Messiah,*Nos. CR-94-134; CA-00-8-3 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### § 122.189 Bond liability.

Any failure on the part of a principal to comply with the conditions of the bond required under § 122.182(c), including a failure of an employer to comply with any requirement applicable to the employer under this subpart, will constitute a breach of the bond and may result in a claim for liquidated damages under the bond.

[T.D. 02-40, 67 FR 48988, July 29, 2002]
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-087 May 25, 2000

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET IN LISLE, ILLINOIS ON JUNE 14

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has

scheduled a meeting of its subcommittees on plant operations and fire protection on June 14 in Lisle,

Illinois.

The subcommittees will discuss items of mutual interest with the representatives of the

agency’s Region III Office, including the plant performance review process, challenges associated with

the implementation of the revised inspection and assessment programs, and fire protection issues.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, will be held at the NRC’s Region III Office, 801

Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois, starting at 8:30 a.m.

Those who wish to make oral or written statements, or seek additional information on the

meeting or changes to the agenda should contact Amarjit Singh, at 301-415-6899.

Other aspects of the meeting are described in the May 24 edition of the Federal Register.

ACRS meeting notices and letter reports are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW.

###
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING

56 Forsyth Street, N.W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

David J. Smith

Clerk of Court 

October 19, 2022

For rules and forms visit

www.ca11.uscourts.gov

Clerk - Southern District of Florida 

U.S. District Court 

400 N MIAMI AVE

MIAMI, FL 33128-1810 

Appeal Number: 22-12376-GG 

Case Style: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Michael Furman

District Court Docket No: 9:20-cv-81205-RAR

The enclosed copy of the Clerk's Order of Dismissal pursuant to appellant's motion to dismiss is 

issued as the mandate of this court. See 11th Cir. R. 42-1(a). 

Any pending motions are now rendered moot in light of the attached order. 

Sincerely,

DAVID J. SMITH, Clerk of Court 

Reply to: Joseph Caruso, GG/lt

Phone #: (404) 335-6177 

Enclosure(s) 

DIS-3 Letter and Entry of Dismissal Vol

USCA11 Case: 22-12376 Date Filed: 10/19/2022 Page: 1 of 2

JE Oct 19, 2022 MIAMI

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1430 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/19/2022 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

______________

No. 22-12376-GG

______________ 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC., 

d.b.a. as Par Funding, et al.,

 Defendants,

MICHAEL C. FURMAN, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

__________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

__________________________________________

ORDER: Motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Appellant Michael C. Furman is 

GRANTED by clerk [9780702-2]. Pursuant to FRAP 42 and 11th Cir. R. 42-1(a), the above 

referenced appeal was duly entered dismissed on this date. 

Effective October 19, 2022. 

DAVID J. SMITH

Clerk of Court of the United States Court

of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

FOR THE COURT - BY DIRECTION 

USCA11 Case: 22-12376 Date Filed: 10/19/2022 Page: 2 of 2

Case 9:20-cv-81205-RAR Document 1430 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/19/2022 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Steven M. Belote, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Shore Financial Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                                                            
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 20, 2007 |  | /s/    STEVEN M.
BELOTE                                    
|                     |  | Steven M. Belote Chief Financial Officer and Vice President



81
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-01-001 January 10, 2001

CONTACT: Breck Henderson

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NOTE TO EDITORS: DECISION ISSUED ON CALLOWAY

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued its decision resulting from a

regulatory conference held November 9 last year with Union Electric Co., which operates the Callaway

Nuclear Plant near Fulton, Missouri. The Agency determined that performance deficiencies in the

plant’s program for managing radiation exposure of employees were of low to moderate safety

significance and may require additional inspection effort. Complete text of the Final Significance

Determination and Notice of Violation can be found on the NRC’s internet website at:

http://www.nrc.gov/OE/rpr/ea00208.htm

###