alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-091 August 15, 2002

NRC LICENSING BOARD TO CONTINUE HEARING SEPTEMBER 9

IN MARYLAND ON TVA APPEAL OF NRC STAFF DISCRIMINATION RULING

A hearing before an independent Atomic Safety & Licensing Board, appointed by the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission to hear a Tennessee Valley Authority appeal of a proposed $110,000

civil penalty for alleged violation of NRC employee protection requirements, will resume on September

9 in Rockville, Md. 

The hearing will resume at 11:00 a.m. EDT in the ASLBP Hearing Room, 3rd Floor, at 11545

Rockville Pike. It will continue, to the extent necessary, on September 10 - 13, beginning at 9:00 a.m.

EDT each day, at the same location. As the hearing proceeds, the Board may make changes to this

schedule, as appropriate. The first portion of the hearing was held during April, May and June in

Chattanooga, Tenn. 

Parties to the proceeding are TVA and the NRC staff. The Board is considering whether TVA

violated NRC requirements by discriminating against a former employee for engaging in protected

activities; and, if so, whether an NRC Order imposing a civil monetary penalty should be sustained.

Members of the Atomic Safety & Licensing Board presiding over the hearing are administrative

judges Charles Bechhoefer, Chairman, Ann Marshall Young and Dr. Richard F. Cole.

The hearing is open to observation by interested members of the public.

Documents related to this proceeding issued prior to December 1, 1999, are available for public

inspection in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike,

Rockville, Md., telephone (301) 415-4737 or 1-800-397-4209. Documents issued subsequent to

November 1, 1999, are available through the PDR and electronically through the NRC’s Agencywide

Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible to the public through NRC’s

internet web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Help in using ADAMS is available by

calling the PDR at the above telephone numbers.

###

EDITORS: Cameras, microphones and video recording devices will be allowed during the

continuation of this proceeding so long as they are not disruptive.
#### § 147.3 Bond required.

The fair operator shall file a bond on Customs Form 301, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.62 of this chapter in such amount as the port director requires. Liquidated damages shall be assessed by the port director under the bond if payments required by §§ 147.33, 147.41 or 147.43 are not paid upon demand.

[T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41186, Oct. 19, 1984]
§ 162.3 Boarding and search of vessels. ( a ) *General authority.* A Customs officer, for the purpose of examining the manifest and other documents and papers and examining, inspecting and searching the vessel, may at any time go on board: ( 1 ) Any vessel at any place in the United States or within the Customs waters of the United States;
( 2 ) Any American vessel on the high seas;
( 3 ) Any vessel within a Customs-enforcement area designated such under the provisions of the Anti-Smuggling Act (Act of August 5, 1935, as amended, 49 Stat. 517; 19 U.S.C. 1701, 1703 through 1711), but Customs officers shall not board a foreign vessel upon the high seas in contravention of any treaty with a foreign government, or in the absence of a special arrangement with the foreign government concerned.
( b ) *Search of army or navy vessel.* If the port director or special agent in charge believes that sufficient grounds exist to justify a search of any army or navy vessel, the facts shall be reported to the commanding officer or master of the vessel with a request that he cause a full search to be made, and advise the port director or special agent in charge of the result of such search. If, after the cargo has been discharged, passengers and their baggage landed, and the baggage of officers and crewmembers examined and passed, the port director or special agent in charge believes that sufficient grounds exist to justify the continuance of Customs supervision of the vessel, the commanding officer or master of the vessel shall be advised accordingly.
( c ) *Assistance of other agencies.* Customs officers are authorized to assist any other agency in the enforcement of United States laws on any vessel.
[T.D. 84-18, 48 FR 52899, Nov. 23, 1983]
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of the United States Trust Company of New York, as Executor, etc., of John Jaffred Butler, Deceased. Margaret Elizabeth Leach, Appellant; United States Trust Company of New York, as Executor, etc., and Others, Respondents.

Decree affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Fowler, S. (reported in 86 Misc. Rep. 603). Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §40a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 40a was editorially reclassified as section 4523 of this title.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

Walnut Creek Field Office

1450 Maria Lane, Walnut Creek, CA 94596-5378

CONTACT: Mark Hammond FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Office: (510) 975-0254 May 10, 1996

Home: (415) 674-1024 RIV 96-30

Pager: (800) 916-4952

NRC REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR

TO HOLD NEWS CONFERENCE IN RICHLAND

L. Joe Callan, Regional Administrator of the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission Region IV in Arlington, Texas, will hold a

news conference on Wednesday, May 15, in Richland, Wash.

Mr. Callan will meet with reporters at approximately 12:30

p.m. at the Walkley Room of Washington Public Power Supply System

headquarters on George Washington Way in Richland. He will

discuss NRC regulatory activities, the status of Washington

Nuclear Project-2, and then will entertain questions.

The news conference will follow a meeting of an NRC

oversight panel with WNP-2 managers. That meeting will begin at

8:30 a.m. at the Walkley Room and will be open to the public for

observation. The oversight panel was created in September to

independently monitor and assess efforts to improve performance

at WNP-2.

The news conference is one in a series that administrators

of NRC's four regions conduct periodically across the nation.

####
(March 15, 1948.)

#### Arwin Sportswear Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Michelina Salerno, Doing Business as Elios Tailoring Company, Appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

Sections 1120 and 1124 of the Civil" Practice Act were not complied with insofar as the second cause of action is concerned. These provisions are mandatory *(Kram*v. *Manufacturers Trust Co.,*238 App. Div. 680). Moreover, there is not a sufficient basis in the record to support the damages awarded in either cause of action. The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered on all issues, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur; Dore, J. P., concurs in result.

Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered on all issues, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Settle order on notice.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-01-031 June 14, 2001

CONTACT: Breck Henderson 

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

e-mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH OPPD TO DISCUSS

SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT FORT CALHOUN STATION

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of Omaha Public

Power District on Wednesday, June 20, to discuss the results of NRC's annual assessment of safety

performance at Fort Calhoun Station, a nuclear power plant near Fort Calhoun, Nebraska.

The meeting will be held at 1:30 p.m. in the Training Center auditorium at Fort Calhoun

Station. The public is invited to observe the meeting. NRC officials will be available after the

meeting to answer questions.

A letter sent from NRC Region IV to OPPD, which addresses plant safety performance during

the previous year and forms the basis of the meeting discussion, is available from the Region IV Office

of Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr/. Current safety

performance information for Fort Calhoun Station is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/FCS/fcs_chart.html .

###
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2387]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel Integrated Preclinical/Clinical AIDS 
Vaccine Development (IPCAVD).
    Date: February 23-24, 2004.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Gaithersburg Marriott Washington Center, 9751 Washington 
Boulevard, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.
    Contact Person: Eleazar Cohen, Phd, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, National Institute of 
Allergy and Infectious Diseases, DEA/NIH/DHHS, 6700 B Rockledge 
Drive, MSC 7616, Room 3112, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-435-3564, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#92f7f1a3a5e5d2fcfbfabcf5fde4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="107573212767507e79783e777f66">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856; 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 28, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-2387 Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 122.162 Failure to notify and explain differences in air cargo manifest. ( a ) *Application.* Penalties shall be assessed if differences in an air cargo manifest (overages or shortages) are discovered and: ( 1 ) The required notice and explanation are not made in time;
( 2 ) The port director is not satisfied that the differences were caused by clerical error or other mistake;
( 3 ) There has been a loss of revenue to the U.S.; or
( 4 ) The port director is not satisfied that there was a valid reason for delay in reporting any differences.
( b ) *Definition.* Under this section, “clerical error or other mistake” means a non-negligent, inadvertant, or typographical mistake in the preparation, assembly, or submission (electronically or otherwise) of the manifest.
( c ) *Repeated differences.* If repeated differences are found in manifests filed by the same person, it may be determined that the differences were a result of negligence and not clerical error or other mistake.
( d ) *Knowledge.* A penalty may be assessed for differences in a manifest that are unknown to the aircraft commander or owner.
[T.D. 88-12, 53 FR 9292, Mar. 22, 1988, as amended by T.D. 99-64, 64 FR 43266, Aug. 10, 1999]
#### § 296.40 Scope.

This subpart describes a claimant's right to bring an Administrative Appeal in response to the Authorized Official's Determination. It also describes the claimant's right to pursue arbitration or seek judicial review following an Administrative Appeal.
§ 122.63 Scheduled airlines. The aircraft commander or agent shall request clearance or permission to depart for aircraft of scheduled airlines covered by this subpart. ( a ) *Clearance at other than airport of final departure.* Aircraft may clear at each airport where merchandise and/or passengers are taken on board for transport outside of the U.S. The clearance applies only to the merchandise and passengers boarding at each place. Clearance shall be requested at the Customs port of entry (regardless of whether it is an international airport) nearest to the place where merchandise and/or passengers are taken on board.
( b ) *Clearance at final departure airport.* Clearance or permission to depart may be requested at the Customs port of entry (regardless of whether it is an international airport) nearest the last departure airport.
#### Joseph C. Rintelen, Appellant, v. Rose D. Schaefer, etc., and Others, Respondents. Woodlawn Cemetery, Defendant.

The parties hereto hav*959ing stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-01-0091 - Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1, Renewal of Full-Power Operating License

Accession Number: ML011360031

Date Released: Tuesday, June 12, 2001

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML011360041 - SECY-01-0091 - Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1, Renewal of Full-power Operating License (11 page(s), 5/21/2001)
    - ML011360053 - SECY-01-0091-Attachment: Renewed License for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 1 (6 page(s), 5/21/2001)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### §92b–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 92b–2 was editorially reclassified as section 5328 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 142
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 142.46 Presentation of invoice and assignment of entry number. ( a ) *Presentation of invoice.* When merchandise that has been approved for Line Release is imported at a Line Release site, the carrier, importer or filer shall present Customs with an invoice with the bar code or codes printed or affixed and, according to the method of transportation, the appropriate manifest document.
( b ) *Verification of data.* If after scanning the bar code at the Line Release site, the Customs officer verifies the data on the bar code with the information on the invoice, he will key the quantity on the invoice and an entry number will be automatically assigned to the transaction. If there are any differences between the system data and the invoice and bar code, including any differences in entry filer, the Customs officer shall order an examination.
( c ) *Other agency documentation.* If the Line Release shipment requires other agency documentation, the Customs officer at the Line Release site will be alerted to that requirement electronically when he verifies the data on the bar code with the information on the invoice. If the required form is presented to the officer with the documentation package, the shipment may be released.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 62496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23957]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>3642]


Commonwealth of Virginia

    As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 
October 18, 2004, I find that the independent cities of Salem and 
Roanoke, and the counties of Alleghany, Craig, Floyd, Giles, 
Montgomery, Patrick, and Roanoke in the Commonwealth of Virginia 
constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms and 
flooding from the remnants of Hurricane Jeanne occurring on September 
27, 2004, and continuing. Applications for loans for physical damage as 
a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on 
December 17, 2004, and for economic injury until the close of business 
on July 18, 2005, at the address listed below or other locally 
announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 
1 Office, 360 Rainbow Blvd., South 3rd Fl., Niagara Falls, NY 14303-
1192.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the following contiguous counties may be filed 
until the specified date at the above location: Bath, Bedford, Bland, 
Botetourt, Carroll, Franklin, Henry, Pulaski, and Rockbridge in the 
Commonwealth of Virginia; Stokes and Surry Counties in the State of 
North Carolina; and Greenbrier, Mercer, Monroe, and Summers Counties in 
the State of West Virginia.
    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      6.375
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      3.187
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      5.800
  Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit           2.900
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Others (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit          4.875
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without           2.900
   Credit Available Elsewhere................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 364206. 
For economic injury the number is 9AF400 for Virginia; 9AF500 for North 
Carolina; and 9AF600 for West Virginia.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)


    Dated: October 19, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-23957 Filed 10-25-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-01-029 July 9, 2001 

 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH TVA NUCLEAR OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS

SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT WATTS BAR NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Tennessee Valley Authority

officials on Tuesday, July 17, to discuss the results of NRC's annual assessment of safety performance

at the Watts Bar nuclear power plant.

The meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m. (EDT) in Classroom 19 of the Watts Bar Training

Center at the plant site near Spring City, Tennessee. The public is invited to observe the meeting. 

NRC officials will be available after the meeting to answer questions. The NRC will hold a second

meeting with state and local government officials after the first meeting. That second meeting is also

open to the public.

A letter sent from NRC Region II to TVA, which addresses plant safety performance during the

previous year and forms the basis of the meeting discussion, is available from the Region II Office of

Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr. Current information for the plant is

available at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/WB1/wb1_chart.html .

###
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-066 April 18, 2000

NRC TO HOLD TWO PUBLIC MEETINGS MAY 4 IN NEVADA

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold two public meetings May 4 in Nevada on the

agency’s high-level radioactive waste repository licensing process.

The meetings are intended to foster a common understanding on issues that would be associated

with the licensing process, if the Department of Energy (DOE) submits a license application to the

NRC for a possible geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada.

The first meeting will be from 8:00 a.m. until noon at the Clark County Government Center,

Gold Room, Fourth Floor, 500 South Grand Central Parkway, Las Vegas. It will be an information

workshop designed primarily for the professional staff of those potentially affected by the repository. It

is open to the public and will begin with an NRC overview of the licensing process, followed by NRC

presentations on information management, the role of the NRC in evaluating the DOE license

application, and the NRC inspection process. Opportunities for questions and answers will be provided

throughout the workshop.

The second meeting will be from 7:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. at the Mountain View Casino and

Bowl, 1750 Pahrump Valley Boulevard, Pahrump. Its purpose is primarily to acquaint the public with

the NRC’s high-level waste licensing process. It will begin with an overview of the three topics

addressed at the first meeting, followed by a question and answer period. In addition, members of the

NRC will be available for informal discussions with members of the public.

Francis X. Cameron, Special Counsel for Public Liaison at the NRC, will act as facilitator for

both meetings.

The NRC plans to hold a third meeting on the high-level waste licensing process in

Washington, D.C., later this year, at a location, time, and date to be announced later.

###
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear by CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93010, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 10.929 Repeated false or unsupported preference claims.

Where verification or other information reveals a pattern of conduct by an importer, exporter, or producer of false or unsupported representations that goods qualify under the PTPA rules of origin set forth in General Note 32, HTSUS, CBP may suspend preferential tariff treatment under the PTPA to entries of identical goods covered by subsequent representations by that importer, exporter, or producer until CBP determines that representations of that person are in conformity with General Note 32, HTSUS.