alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 14

                      HARRIS PREFERRED CAPITAL CORPORATION

         CODE OF ETHICS FOR PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICERS


     Harris Preferred Capital Corporation (the "Corporation") seeks to promote
ethical conduct in its financial management and reporting. As a public company,
it is essential that the Corporation's filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission are accurate, complete and understandable. The principal executive
and financial officers of the Corporation hold an essential role in this
process. This Code of Ethics applies to the principal executive officer,
principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and controller of the
Corporation and other employees of the Corporation performing similar functions
as well as any other employee of the Corporation who may be designated by the
Board of Directors from time to time as being subject to this Code of Ethics
(each, a "Senior Officer").

     1.   Each Senior Officer shall:

                   (i)   Act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or
          apparent conflicts of interest in personal and professional
          relationships.

                  (ii)   Provide the Board of Directors with information that is
          accurate, complete, timely and understandable.


                 (iii)   Comply with all laws, rules and regulations of federal,
          state and local governments and regulatory agencies.

                  (iv)    Act in good faith with due care, competence and
          diligence, without allowing his or her independent judgment or
          conduct to be improperly influenced.

                   (v)   Proactively promote ethical behavior within the
          Corporation.

                  (vi)   Promote responsible use of and control over all
          Corporation assets and resources.

                 (vii)   Provide full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable
          information in all reports and documents filed with, or submitted to,
          the Securities and Exchange Commission or any other governmental
          entity and in any other public communication made by the Corporation.



<PAGE>

                  (viii)   Promptly report any violation of this Code of Ethics
          to the Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

     2.   Violations of this Code of Ethics may subject a Senior Officer to
disciplinary action, ranging from a reprimand to dismissal and possible
criminal prosecution.

     3.   Each Senior Officer shall certify each year that he or she has not
violated this Code of Ethics and is not aware of any violation of this Code of
Ethics by any other Senior Officer that has not been reported to the Chairman
of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

     4.   This Code of Ethics may be amended by the Board of Directors.
4850-8297-1592.1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No. 0:20cv61691–Civ or Cr–(USDJ SMITH) 

SPEEDCAST CYPRUS LTD., § 

§ 

§ 

Plaintiff, § 

§ 

§ 

vs. § 

§ 

§ 

M/V CONTSHIP AIR, § 

HER ENGINES AND § 

TACKLE, ETC., IN REM; AND §

VERONA SHIPTRADING, INC., § 

AND §

CONTSHIPS MANAGEMENT INC. § 

IN PERSONAM §

§ 

§ 

Defendants. § 

CONSENT AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT FOR THE 

APPOINTMENT OF A SUBSTITUTE CUSTODIAN 

Plaintiff Speedcast Cyprus Ltd., and National Maritime Services, Inc., the proposed 

Substitute Custodian, hereby expressly release the United States Marshal Service for this District, 

and the United States Marshals Service, from any and all liability and responsibility for the care 

and custody of Liberian flag containership, M/v Contship Air, IMO 9364356, its engines, freights, 

apparel, appurtenances, tackle, etc., while in the hands of National Maritime Services, Inc. 

Plaintiff and National Maritime Services, Inc. also expressly agree to hold the 

United States Marshal Service for this District, and the United States Marshals Service, 

harmless from any and all claims whatsoever arising during the period of the substitute 

custodianship. 

Case 0:20-cv-61691-RS Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2020 Page 1 of 3
4850-8297-1592.1 

4850-8297-1592.1 

2 

4850-8297-1592.1 

As counsel of record in this action, the undersigned represents that he has been 

expressly authorized by Plaintiff to sign this Consent and Indemnification Agreement for, 

and on behalf of the Plaintiff. 

Dated: August 21, 2020 

Respectfully submitted, 

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

s:/ John S. Lord, Jr. 

John S. Lord, Jr., Esq. 

FL Bar No. 0016527 

JLord@foley.com 

Foley & Lardner LLP 

One Biscayne Tower 

2 South Biscayne Blvd., Suite 1900 

Miami, FL 33131 

(305) 482-8400 (Telephone) 

(305) 482-8600 (Fax) 

Of Counsel 

Pro Hac Vice Forthcoming 

Peter A. McLauchlan 

TX Bar No. 13740900 

pmclauchlan@foley.com 

Anacarolina Estaba 

TX Bar No. 24085298 

aestaba@foley.com 

1000 Louisiana, Suite 2000 

Houston, Texas 77002-2099 

(713) 276-5500 

pmclauchlan@foley.com 

aestaba@foley.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 

SPEEDCAST CYPRUS LTD. 

Case 0:20-cv-61691-RS Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2020 Page 2 of 3
Case 0:20-cv-61691-RS Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2020 Page 3 of 3
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 99-55 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Friday, March 19, 1999)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor

Safeguards (ACRS) has scheduled meetings of two of its subcommittees in Rockville,

Maryland. The planning and procedures subcommittee will meet on April 6, followed by

a meeting of the reliability and probabilistic risk assessment subcommittee on April 7.

At the planning and procedures subcommittee meeting, members will discuss

proposed ACRS activities and the status of a new appointment.

The subcommittee on reliability and probabilistic risk assessment will discuss the

NRC staff’s proposed approach for revising the safety goal policy statement.

The meetings will be held in room T-2B1 of the agency’s Two White Flint North

building at 11545 Rockville Pike. The first meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. and last until

the conclusion of business. The second meeting will begin at 8:30 a.m. and last until

noon.

Other aspects of the meetings, including opportunities for comment, will be

described in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

###
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

Walnut Creek Field Office

1450 Maria Lane, Walnut Creek, CA 94596-5378

RIV-9760 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Mark Hammond Oct. 9, 1997

OFFICE: (510) 975-0254

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVES

FINANCIAL ASSURANCE AGREEMENTS FOR SEQUOYAH FUELS

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has voted to approve two separate NRC

agreements, one with Sequoyah Fuels Corp. (SFC) and the other with General Atomics (GA),

which assure that funding will be available to decommission the closed Sequoyah Fuels

uranium processing plant near Gore, Oklahoma. The Commission rejected arguments by the

Native Americans for a Clean Environment (NACE), the Cherokee Nation and the State of

Oklahoma that the pacts would not assure that enough money would be available.

The Commission ruling upholds a November 1996 decision by the Atomic Safety and

Licensing Board. In January the Commission granted a joint petition by NACE, the Cherokee

Nation and Oklahoma to review the ASLB decision. NACE subsequently filed a legal brief

spelling out its arguments against the agreement, and Oklahoma filed an amicus curiae brief

supporting NACE.

Under the settlement agreement with SFC, the company is required to commit all of its

present and future net assets and net revenues to funding the decontamination and

decommissioning of the SFC site. The agreement with GA requires that company to place $9

million into a decommissioning trust fund to be administered by the NRC and to remove two GA

officers from SFC’s board of directors. The Internal Revenue Service could claim 40 percent of

that $9 million as income tax, leaving $5.4 million for the cleanup.

The NRC staff argued before the Commission that the pact with SFC represents the

maximum possible assurances from SFC, that NRC can take legal action to enforce the

agreement and that there was no point in expending more agency and SFC resources on

further litigation.

As for General Atomics, the ASLB ruled, and the Commission agreed, that the

settlement agreement with GA was in the public interest because $9 million in a trust fund today

could be worth more than some uncertain future settlement requiring complex and expensive

litigation.

NACE and the Cherokee Nation have the right to appeal the Commission ruling to the

U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and to request a hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1410

To amend chapter 81 of title 5, United States Code, to authorize the use 

of clinical social workers to conduct evaluations to determine workrelated emotional and mental illnesses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2003

Mr. TOWNS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend chapter 81 of title 5, United States Code, to 

authorize the use of clinical social workers to conduct 

evaluations to determine work-related emotional and 

mental illnesses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXAMINATION BY CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKERS 

4 FOR FEDERAL WORKER COMPENSATION 

5 CLAIMS. 

6 Section 8101 of title 5, United States Code, is 

7 amended—
2

•HR 1410 IH 

1 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and osteo2 pathic practitioners’’ and inserting ‘‘osteopathic 

3 practitioner, and clinical social workers’’; and 

4 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘osteopathic 

5 practitioners’’ and inserting ‘‘osteopathic practi6 tioners, clinical social workers,’’.

Æ
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

No. III-01-006 February 15, 2001

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT POINT BEACH NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Lisle, Illinois, have announced the assignment of

Paul Krohn as the agency’s senior resident inspector at the Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant in Two

Rivers, Wisconsin. The plant is operated by the Nuclear Management Co.

Krohn, a NRC employee since 1996, began his duties at the plant February 12. He most

recently worked as a resident inspector at the LaSalle Nuclear Power Plant in Marseilles, Illinois, and

prior to that as a resident inspector at the Prairie Island Nuclear Power Plant in Welch, Minnesota.

Prior to joining the NRC, Krohn worked for Lockheed Martin Inc. as a non-destructive testing

development engineer at Knolls Atomic Nuclear Power Laboratory in Schenectady, N.Y. He also was

a shift supervisor and nuclear plant engineer for General Electric Co. at a U.S. Navy nuclear submarine

prototype power plant in West Milton, N.Y.

Krohn earned a bachelor’s degree in marine engineering from the State University of New

York’s Maritime College, and a master’s in mechanical engineering from the University of Michigan.

He also has a professional engineers license from the State of New York.

Krohn joins Resident Inspector Ray Powell at the Point Beach plant. They can be reached at

the plant at (920) 755-2309.

###
114 STAT. 1294 PUBLIC LAW 106–327—OCT. 19, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4157:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

July 18, considered and passed House.

Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–327

106th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 600 Lincoln

Avenue in Pasadena, California, as the ‘‘Matthew ‘Mack’ Robinson Post Office

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

600 Lincoln Avenue in Pasadena, California, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Matthew ‘Mack’ Robinson Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Matthew

‘Mack’ Robinson Post Office Building’’.

Approved October 19, 2000.

Oct. 19, 2000

[H.R. 4157]
#### § 133.46 Demand for redelivery of released articles.

If it is determined that articles which have been released from Customs custody are subject to the prohibitions or restrictions of this subpart, an authorized CBP official shall promptly make demand for redelivery of the articles under the terms of the bond on Customs Form 301, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.62 of this chapter, in accordance with § 141.113 of this chapter. If the articles are not redelivered to Customs custody, a claim for liquidated damages shall be made in accordance with § 141.113(h) of this chapter.

[T.D. 72-266, 37 FR 20678, Oct. 3, 1972, as amended by T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17447, July 2, 1973; T.D. 74-227, 39 FR 32023, Sept. 4, 1974; T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41183, Oct. 19, 1984; T.D. 99-64, 64 FR 43266, Aug. 10, 1999; CBP Dec. 16-26, 81 FR 93018, Dec. 20, 2016]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-02-010 March 19, 2002

CONTACT: Breck Henderson E-mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

Cellular: 817-917-1227

NRC TO MEET WITH OPPD 

TO DISCUSS SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT FORT CALHOUN

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Omaha Public

Power District on Tuesday, March 26, to discuss the results of the agency's annual assessment of safety

performance at the Fort Calhoun Station nuclear power plant. The facility is located near Blair,

Nebraska, and is operated by OPPD.

The meeting, which will be the open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 

7 p.m. at Dana Hall of Science, Dana College, 2848 College Dr., Blair. NRC staff will be available

before the meeting is adjourned to answer any questions from the public.

A letter sent from NRC Region IV to OPPD addresses plant performance during the period

April 1 to December 31, 2001, and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on

the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/fcs_2001q4.pdf.

Current performance information for Fort Calhoun is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/FCS/fcs_chart.html.

###
McKenzie Bay Exhibit 10.10 to Form 10-K - 1-2003



EXHIBIT 10.10


SOQUEM


by telecopier and mail


Sainte-Foy, June 21ST, 2001






Mr. Gary Westerholm

President

McKenzie Bay International Ltd.

3362 Moraine Drive

Brighton, Michigan  48114

USA


	
Re:
	
Lac Doré Vanadium Project

	
 

	
Option & Joint Venture Agreement Dated August 31st, 1998









Gary:


This is to confirm that your request dated May 4th last to have Paragraph 1c of our Option and Joint Venture Agreement dated August 31st, 1998 modified to provide McKenzie Bay International Ltd. ("MKBY") an extension of one additional year to deliver to SOQUEM an independent Bankable Feasibility Study has been accepted by SOQUEM's board.


Therefore, the Option Agreement will refer to August 31st, 2002, as the official delivery date for the aforementioned study.


I would also like to confirm that at the same board meeting, I was authorized to accept a seat on MKBY's board provided all the necessary conditions to our private placement in MKBY are met, and the investment is completed. I have been told you will be provided with a draft copy of a subscription document very shortly for comments, and that things are moving along.


Regards,


/s/ Yves Harvey


Yves Harvey, Eng., Ph.D.

President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 200.735-125 Exemption from restrictions. ( a ) *Scientific and technological information solicited by the Commission.* Communications of a former Commission employee solely for the purpose of furnishing scientific or technological information solicited by the Commission in the course of its statutory investigations are exempted from the restrictions on postemployment practices.
( b ) *Exemption for persons with special qualifications in a technical discipline* — ( 1 ) *Applicability.* A former Commission employee may be exempted from the restrictions on postemployment practices if the Chairman, in consultation with the Director, Office of Government Ethics (the Director), executes a certification published in the Federal Register that the former Commission employee has outstanding qualifications in a scientific, technological, or other technical discipline; that the former Commission employee is acting with respect to a particular matter which requires such qualifications; and that the national interest would be served by the former Commission employee's participation.
( 2 ) *Certification authority.* Certification shall be by the Chairman, or in the absence thereof, by the acting head of the Commission. Consultation with the Director shall precede any certification. The exemption is effective upon the execution of the certification. The Secretary shall immediately transmit the certification to the Federal Register for publication.
( c ) *Testimony and statement under oath are subject to penalty of perjury* — ( 1 ) *Applicability.* A former Commission employee may testify before any court, board, commission, or legislative body with respect to matters of fact within the personal knowledge of the former Commission employee. This provision does not, however, allow a former Commission employee, otherwise barred under 18 U.S.C. 207 (a), (b), or (c), to testify on behalf of another as an expert witness except ( i ) to the extent that the former employee may testify from personal knowledge as to occurrences which are relevant to the issues in the proceeding, including those in which the Commission employee participated, utilizing his or her expertise, or
( ii ) in any proceeding where it is determined that another expert in the field cannot practically be obtained, that it is impracticable for the facts or opinions on the same subject to be obtained by other means, and that the former Commission employee's testimony is required in the interest of justice.
( 2 ) *Statements under penalty of perjury.* A former Commission employee may make any statements required to be made under penalty of perjury, such as those required in registration statements for securities, tax returns, or security clearances. The exception does not, however, permit a former employee to submit pleadings, applications, or other documents in a representational capacity on behalf of another merely because the attorney or other representative must sign the documents under oath or penalty of perjury.
###### Editorial Note on Part 159

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93023, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 159.31 Rates to be used.

Except as otherwise specified in this subpart, no rate or rates of exchange shall be used to convert foreign currency for Customs purposes other than a proclaimed rate or certified rate or rates.
§ 122.5 Reproduction of Customs forms. ( a ) *Specifications.* Subject to approval by Customs, the forms mentioned in this part may be printed by private parties if the specified size, wording arrangement, style and size of type, and quality of paper are used.
( b ) *Exceptions.* Port directors may accept privately printed copies of the General Declaration (Customs Form 7507) and air cargo manifest (Customs Form 7509) which are different from the official forms. The privately printed forms shall include all information required on the official forms. The differences allowed are: ( 1 ) *General Declaration.* Customs Form 7507 may be printed in several languages, so long as the form includes an English version. The instructions on the reverse side of the official form may be omitted.
( 2 ) *Air cargo manifest.* Customs Form 7509 may be changed to allow for additional information used by the airline.
Exhibit 32.1



                       CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



William F. Garrett,  the President and Chief  Executive  Officer of Delta Mills,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:

     1.   The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 28, 2003 of the
          Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
          (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

The foregoing  certification  is being furnished  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350
and is not  being  filed  as  part of the  Report  or as a  separate  disclosure
document.






Date       October 2, 2003               By: /s/ William F. Garrett
      -------------------------------    ------------------------------------
                                         William F. Garrett
                                         President & Chief Executive Officer





A  signed  copy  of  this  written  statement  required  by  section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.