alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### PART V—DEDUCTIONS FOR PERSONAL EXEMPTIONS

Sec.
151.
Allowance of deductions for personal exemptions.
152.
Dependent defined.
153.
Cross references.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §1901(b)(7)(A)(ii), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1794, redesignated item 154 as 153 and struck out former item 153 "Determination of marital status".
§ 122.32 Aircraft required to land. ( a ) Any aircraft coming into the U.S., from an area outside of the U.S., is required to land, unless it is denied permission to land in the U.S. by CBP pursuant to § 122.12(c), or is exempted from landing by the Federal Aviation Administration.
( b ) *Conditional permission to land.* CBP has the authority to limit the locations where aircraft entering the U.S. from a foreign area may land. As such, aircraft must land at the airport designated in their APIS transmission unless instructed otherwise by CBP or changes to the airport designation are required for aircraft and/or airspace safety as directed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) flight services.
[CBP Dec. 08-43, 73 FR 68313, Nov. 18, 2008]
#### § 115.37 General.

This subpart provides for the approval and certification of containers after manufacture, and for those altered so as to void their design type approval.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YELSON OTONIEL TORREZ-LUNA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-74032

Agency No. A099-535-387

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 14, 2010 ** 

San Francisco, California

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Yelson Otoniel Torrez-Luna, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for

review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals which dismissed his

appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture.

FILED

DEC 29 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-74032

We reject Torrez-Luna’s claim that he is eligible for asylum based on his

membership in a particular social group, namely young men who resist gang

recruitment. See Ramos-Lopez v. Holder, 563 F.3d 855, 858-62 (9th Cir. 2009)

(rejecting as a social group young Honduran men resisting gangs); Santos-Lemus v.

Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 745-46 (9th Cir. 2008) (rejecting as a social group “young

men in El Salvador resisting gang violence”). We also reject Torrez-Luna’s claim

that he is eligible for asylum based on his political opinion, namely his position

that he is resistant to gangs. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 482-84

(1992); Barrios v. Holder, 581 F.3d 849, 854-56 (9th Cir. 2009). Because TorrezLuna failed to demonstrate that he was persecuted on account of a protected

ground, we uphold the agency’s denial of his asylum and withholding of removal

claims. Id. at 856.

In addition, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief

because Torrez-Luna failed to establish that it is more likely than not that he will

be tortured at the acquiescence of the government if he returns to Honduras. See

Santos-Lemus, 542 F.3d at 748.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
### §4572. Rates of compensation paid by Secretary of Senate; applicability of Senate pay adjustments by President pro tempore of Senate

No provision of this Act or of any Act enacted after October 1, 1976, which specifies a rate of compensation (including a maximum rate) for any position or employee whose compensation is disbursed by the Secretary of the Senate shall, unless otherwise specifically provided therein, be construed to affect the applicability of section 4571 of this title to such rate.

(Pub. L. 94–440, title I, §107, Oct. 1, 1976, 90 Stat. 1444.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, means the Legislative Branch Appropriation Act, 1977, Pub. L. 94–440, Oct. 1, 1976, 90 Stat. 1439. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 60a–1a of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-393) the Caribou-Targhee National Forests' Eastern Idaho Resource Advisory Committee will meet Tuesday, November 30, 2004 in Idaho Falls for a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

# DATES:

The business meeting will be held on November 30, 2004 from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting location is the Caribou-Targhee National Forest Headquarters Office, 1405 Hollipark Drive, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jerry Reese, Caribou-Targhee National Forest Supervisor and Designated Federal Officer, at (208) 524-7500.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The business meeting on November 30, 2004, begins at 10 a.m. at the Caribou-Targhee National Forest Headquarters Office, 1405 Hollipark Drive, Idaho Falls, Idaho. Agenda topics will include looking at funding for this upcoming year, briefed on project status from last years approved projects, and welcoming new members.

Dated: October 13, 2004.

Jerry B. Reese,

Caribou-Targhee Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 04-23615  Filed 10-21-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 648 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to make 

a technical correction to the water rights settlement for the ShoshonePaiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2021 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO (for herself, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. RISCH, and Ms. ROSEN) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 

2009 to make a technical correction to the water rights 

settlement for the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck 

Valley Reservation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Technical Correction 

5 to the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Res6 ervation Water Rights Settlement Act of 2021’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 648 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF PAYMENT OF INTEREST ON 

2 TRUST FUNDS ESTABLISHED UNDER SETTLE3 MENT. 

4 Section 10807 of the Omnibus Public Land Manage5 ment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–11; 123 Stat. 1408) 

6 is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (b)(3)— 

8 (A) by striking ‘‘There is’’ and inserting 

9 the following: 

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—There is’’; and 

11 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(B) INTEREST PAYMENTS.—There is au13 thorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for 

14 deposit into the Development Fund the interest 

15 that would have accrued during the period be16 ginning on October 1, 2009, and ending on 

17 January 25, 2016, on balances held in the De18 velopment Fund, as calculated using the appli19 cable rate for interest-bearing obligations of the 

20 United States if the amounts in the Develop21 ment Fund had been invested in accordance 

22 with— 

23 ‘‘(i) the Act of April 1, 1880 (21 Stat. 

24 70, chapter 41; 25 U.S.C. 161); and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 648 IS

1 ‘‘(ii) the first section of the Act of 

2 June 24, 1938 (52 Stat. 1037, chapter 

3 648; 25 U.S.C. 162a).’’; and 

4 (2) in subsection (c)(3)— 

5 (A) by striking ‘‘There is’’ and inserting 

6 the following: 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—There is’’; and 

8 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(B) INTEREST PAYMENTS.—There is au10 thorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for 

11 deposit into the Maintenance Fund the interest 

12 that would have accrued during the period be13 ginning on October 1, 2009, and ending on 

14 January 25, 2016, on balances held in the 

15 Maintenance Fund, as calculated using the ap16 plicable rate for interest-bearing obligations of 

17 the United States if the amounts in the Mainte18 nance Fund had been invested in accordance 

19 with— 

20 ‘‘(i) the Act of April 1, 1880 (21 Stat. 

21 70, chapter 41; 25 U.S.C. 161); and 

22 ‘‘(ii) the first section of the Act of 

23 June 24, 1938 (52 Stat. 1037, chapter 

24 648; 25 U.S.C. 162a).’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-01-037 September 5, 2001 

 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov 

 

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING AT TURKEY POINT

TO DISCUSS INSPECTION OF PLANTíS LICENSE RENEWAL PROGRAM

Officials of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with Florida Power & Light

management at 9:00 a.m. Friday, September 14 at the Turkey Point nuclear power plant Nuclear

Training Building near Florida City, Florida, to present the results of the NRCís second inspection of

the Turkey Point license renewal program. The meeting is open to observation by the public.

The NRC conducted a similar meeting at Turkey Point on June 8 to discuss results of the

agencyís initial inspection of the program. Florida Power & Light filed an application to renew the

operating licenses of the two units at the Turkey Point plant in September 2000.

NRC officials said there will be a report on the second inspection, which began August 20 and

will end September 14. That report will be issued approximately 45 days after the meeting and will be

available to the public.

The meeting is between the NRC and Florida Power & Light but is open to observation by

interested members of the public. NRC officials will be available after the meeting to answer any

questions observers may have.

###
#### Herman Brandt, Respondent, v. Joseph Davidson, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
### §4554. Waiver by Speaker of House of claims of United States arising out of erroneous payments to officers or employees paid by Chief Administrative Officer of House

#### (a) Waiver of claim for erroneous payment of pay or allowances

A claim of the United States against a person arising out of an erroneous payment of any pay or allowances, other than travel and transportation expenses and allowances, on or after July 25, 1974, to an officer or employee whose pay is disbursed by the Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives, the collection of which would be against equity and good conscience and not in the best interests of the United States, may be waived in whole or in part by the Speaker of the House.

#### (b) Investigation and report

An application for waiver of a claim shall be investigated by the Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives who shall submit a written report of his investigation to the Speaker of the House.

#### (c) Prohibition of waiver

The Speaker of the House may not exercise his authority under this section to waive any claim—

(1) if, in his opinion, there exists, in connection with the claim, an indication of fraud, misrepresentation, fault, or lack of good faith on the part of the officer or employee or any other person having an interest in obtaining a waiver of the claim; or

(2) if the application for waiver is received in his office after the expiration of 3 years immediately following the date on which the erroneous payment of pay or allowances was discovered.

#### (d) Credit for waiver

In the audit and settlement of the accounts of any accountable officer or official, full credit shall be given for any amounts with respect to which collection by the United States is waived under this section.

#### (e) Effect of waiver

An erroneous payment, the collection of which is waived under this section, is deemed a valid payment for all purposes.

#### (f) Construction with other laws

This section does not affect any authority under any other law to litigate, settle, compromise, or waive any claim of the United States.

#### (g) Rules and regulations

The Speaker of the House shall prescribe rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of this section.

(Pub. L. 93–359, §3, July 25, 1974, 88 Stat. 395; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §204(76), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1742; Pub. L. 104–316, title I, §102(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3828.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 130d of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–316 struck out ", if the claim is not the subject of an exception made by the Comptroller General in the account of any accountable officer or official" before period at end.

Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "Chief Administrative Officer" for "Clerk".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "Chief Administrative Officer" for "Clerk".
```

[110th Congress Public Law 221]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ221.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 734]]

Public Law 110-221
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
     3050 Hunsinger Lane in Louisville, Kentucky, as the ``Iraq and 
 Afghanistan Fallen Military Heroes of Louisville Memorial Post Office 
   Building'', in honor of the servicemen and women from Louisville, 
  Kentucky, who died in service during Operation Enduring Freedom and 
      Operation Iraqi <<NOTE: May 7, 2008 -  [H.R. 4454]>> Freedom.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN FALLEN MILITARY HEROES OF 
                              LOUISVILLE MEMORIAL POST OFFICE 
                              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3050 Hunsinger Lane in Louisville, Kentucky, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Iraq and Afghanistan Fallen Military Heroes of 
Louisville Memorial Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Iraq and 
Afghanistan Fallen Military Heroes of Louisville Memorial Post Office 
Building''.

    Approved May 7, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4454:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            Feb. 28, considered and passed House.
            Apr. 22, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### Altoria Realty and Construction Company, Respondent, v. Peter Delacy, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Exhibit  99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Thomas  W.  Schneider, President and Chief Executive Officer, and James A. Dowd,
Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer of Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company"),  each  certify in his/her capacity as an officer of the Company that
he/she  has  reviewed  the  Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the
quarter  ended  December  31,  2002  and  that to the best of his/her knowledge:

     1.     the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.     the  information  contained  in  the  report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

The  purpose  of  this  statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section  1350  of  the  United  States  Code,  as  amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002.





March 28, 2003                       /s/Thomas W. Schneider
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date                                   Thomas  W.  Schneider
                              President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


March 28, 2003                        /s/James A. Dowd
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date                                   James  A.  Dowd
                              Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 26, 2010 

d0719 

Order 

 

July 26, 2010 

141039 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141039 

 COA: 296658 

Genesee CC: 08-023791-FC 

GREGORY BERNARD GRAY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 29, 2010 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (i)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
 (ii)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s / Jeffrey L. KarafaJeffrey L. KarafaTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer,
Dearborn Bancorp, Inc.
#### Charles M. Wolff, Respondent, v. Chaldean Realty Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants, and Plumbers' Supply House, Inc., Impleaded Defendant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
473 P.2d 372

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jimmy Lee WHEELER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 491.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

July 17, 1970.

C. Fincher Neal, Neal & Neal, Hobbs, for defendant-appellant.

James A. Maloney, Atty. Gen., William J. Torrington, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

Defendant pled guilty and was sentenced to not less than one nor more than five years in the penitentiary. He moved for postconviction relief. Section 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A.1953 (Supp.1969). He claimed that he had been promised a sentence of approximately ninety days if he plead guilty. His motion was denied; he appeals.

Generally, a guilty plea induced by a promise is void. State v. Baumgardner, 79 N.M. 341, 443 P.2d 511 (Ct.App. 1968). Here, however, there is no claim of plea bargaining, as in State v. Ortiz, 77 N.M. 751, 427 P.2d 264 (1967). Defendant claims only that his court appointed counsel made the promise. Although court appointed counsel is a responsible official in New Mexico’s system of criminal justice, his duty is to represent his client. State v. Gorton, 79 N.M. 775, 449 P.2d 791 (Ct. App.1969). Thus, it is doubtful that the alleged promise by counsel can be considered to have been made by anyone representing the State of New Mexico. See State v. Knerr, 79 N.M. 133, 440 P.2d 808 (Ct.App. 1968). Defendant’s claim, then, may be no more than a claim that he pled guilty upon the advice of his own counsel. If so, it stated no basis for relief. Goodwin v. State, 79 N.M. 438, 444 P.2d 765 (Ct.App.1968). We assume, but do not decide, that the promise alleged to have been *759made by defendant’s court appointed counsel states a basis for postconviction relief.

Even with that assumption,' defendant is not entitled to relief for two reasons.

1. The trial court conducted a hearing, heard evidence and found defendant “ * * * was not promised or even told by his attorney * * * that if he would plead guilty he would be assessed a penalty of only 90 days. * * * ” This finding is not attacked; it is conclusive on appeal. State v. Thompson, 80 N.M. 134, 452 P.2d 468 (1969); State v. Garcia, 80 N.M. 21, 450 P.2d 621 (1969).

2. The evidence concerning the alleged promise is conflicting. Nevertheless, there is substantial evidence (the attorney’s testimony) which supports the finding. Being supported by substantial evidence, the finding is conclusive on appeal. State v. Byrd, 80 N.M. 517, 458 P.2d 592 (1969); State v. Johnson, 81 N.M. 318, 466 P.2d 884 (Ct.App.1970).

The order denying relief is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

OMAN and HENDLEY, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0428

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

TYLER EDWARD GIFFIN,

Defendant and Appellee.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 9, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellee’s response brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 5 2021

03/05/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0428