alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 165.21 Administrative record. ( a ) *Administrative record.* CBP will maintain a record for purposes of making a determination as to evasion under § 165.27 and conducting an administrative review under § 165.46. The administrative record will contain all of the following, if applicable, but is not limited to: ( 1 ) Materials obtained and considered by CBP during the course of an investigation under this part;
( 2 ) Factual information submitted pursuant to § 165.23;
( 3 ) Information obtained during and the results of any verification conducted pursuant to § 165.25;
( 4 ) Materials from other agencies provided to CBP pursuant to the investigation;
( 5 ) Written arguments submitted pursuant to § 165.26 and subpart D of this part; and
( 6 ) Summaries of oral discussions with interested parties relevant to the investigation pursuant to § 165.23.
( b ) *Maintenance of the record.* CBP will maintain the administrative record of each investigation or review conducted by CBP pursuant to this part. All information properly filed with CBP pursuant to §§ 165.4 and 165.5 will be placed on the administrative record. CBP will not consider in its determinations or include on the administrative record any information that is not properly filed with CBP.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 1, 2014

p0924

Order 

Clerk

October 1, 2014

148274 & (34) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148274

COA: 313548

Chippewa CC: 10-000378-FC

DARRIN SCOTT LAPINE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the “motion for immediate consideration to obtain/transfer 

the Court of Appeals file and video to the Supreme Court for full review” is DENIED as 

moot because the Court has already received those items. The application for leave to 

appeal the October 23, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT 

the Chippewa County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal 

within 28 days after the date of this order. The prosecutor shall address the defendant’s 

assertion that the state courts lacked subject matter jurisdiction in this case because he is 

Indian and the sentencing offenses occurred within the jurisdiction of the federal 

government or the Bay Mills Indian Community.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 23.03



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-4 (Registration No.
333-60053) and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-43659 and 333-59205) of Building One Services
Corporation of our report dated February 19, 1998 appearing in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.  We also consent to the
references to us under the heading "Experts" in such Prospectus.


/s/ Frazier & Deeter, LLC

Frazier & Deeter, LLC
Atlanta, Georgia
March 26, 1999
Editorial Note on Part 142
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 142 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 142.22 Application for special permit for immediate delivery. ( a ) *Form.* An application for a special permit for immediate delivery will be made on CBP Form 3461, or its electronic equivalent, supported by the documentation provided for in § 142.3. A commercial invoice will not be required, except for merchandise released under the provisions of 19 U.S.C. 1484(j). Instead of a commercial invoice, the importer may deliver to CBP a pro forma invoice, waybill, or other document setting forth an adequate description of the merchandise and the quantities, together with the values or approximate values when values are needed for the purpose of examination. If the merchandise is to be released under a term special permit, the documentation also shall show the term special permit number, as provided for in § 142.24.
( b ) *CBP custody.* Merchandise for which a special permit for immediate delivery has been issued under § 142.21 of this part shall be considered to remain in CBP custody until the filing of one of the following: ( 1 ) An entry summary for consumption, with estimated duties attached; an entry summary for consumption without estimated duties attached, if entry/entry summary information and a valid scheduled statement date (pursuant to § 24.25 of this chapter) have successfully been received by CBP via the Automated Broker Interface; an entry summary for warehouse; or an entry summary for entry temporarily under bond, which may be filed in any of the circumstances under § 142.21 of this part except for merchandise released from warehouse under § 142.21(f) of this part;
( 2 ) A withdrawal for consumption, with estimated duties attached, which shall be filed only for merchandise released from warehouse under § 142.21(f) of this part;
( 3 ) An entry for transportation and exportation, immediate transportation without appraisement, or direct exportation, which shall be filed in those circumstances under § 142.21(b) and (e)(2) of this part; or entry for transportation and exportation, or direct exportation, which shall be filed in the circumstances under § 142.28 of this part or
( 4 ) An application to destroy, which shall be filed in those circumstances under §§ 142.21(b) and (e)(2), and § 142.28 of this part.
(R.S. 251, as amended, secs. 623, as amended, 624, 46 Stat. 759, as amended (19 U.S.C. 66, 1623, 1624))
[T.D. 79-221, 44 FR 46821, Aug. 9, 1979, as amended by T.D. 81-260, 46 FR 49842, Oct. 8, 1981; T.D. 89-104, 54 FR 50499, Dec. 7, 1989; T.D. 03-09, 68 FR 8721, Feb. 25, 2003; CBP Dec. 06-11, 71 FR 31927, June 2, 2006; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61289, Oct. 13, 2015]
Exhibit 10.5

                   AMENDMENT TO OPEN ENDED PRODUCT AGREEMENT


WHEREAS, on March 20, 1998 Wade Cook Financial Corporation, a Nevada corporation
("WCFC")  and/or its assigns and Wade B. Cook,  a resident of  Washington  State
("Cook") and/or his assigns entered into an Open Ended Product Agreement whereby
Cook  provided  WCFC  with  a  non-exclusive   worldwide  license  to  all  Cook
intellectual property as listed in Exhibit A of the Agreement.

Whereas,  the original Open Ended Product Agreement  provided for a royalty rate
of ten percent (10%) of all gross sales for Products licensed thereunder.

Whereas, Mr. Cook and/or his assigns is a substantial shareholder in the company
and Mr.  Cook  and/or  his  assigns  have a vested  interest  in the  continuing
profitability the company.

Whereas, WCFC from time to time has certain cash flow needs beyond the resources
available.

NOW  THEREFORE,  the parties  hereby  agree that Mr. Cook and/or his assigns may
forego any amount of  royalties  due under the terms of the  Agreement as deemed
appropriate by Cook in his sole discretion, depending on the cash flow needs and
or anticipated cash flow needs of WCFC at the time.

Executed in duplicate this 13th day of November, 1998.


WADE COOK FINANCIAL CORPORATION


By: /s/ Kiman Lucas
    -------------------------------
Name:  Kiman Lucas
Title: General Counsel


/s/ Wade B. Cook
-----------------------------------
Name:  Wade B. Cook
Title: President


/s/ Wade B. Cook
-----------------------------------
Wade B. Cook, Licensor
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-22901-CIV-GAYLES/OTAZO-REYES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v. 

THUNDERBIRD POWER CORP., 

RICHARD HINDS, ANTHONY GOLDSTEIN,

and JOHN ALEXANDER VAN AREM,

Defendants.

__________________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF OUTCOME OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

THIS CAUSE came before the undersigned for a Settlement Conference held on August 

31, 2021, pursuant to the Court’s Order Referring Case for Settlement Conference, issued by the 

Honorable Darrin P. Gayles [D.E. 84]. The undersigned is pleased to report that Plaintiff 

Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and Defendant Richard Hinds (“Hinds”) have 

reached a partial settlement as to nonmonetary terms. The parties will continue to negotiate in an 

effort to reach agreement as to monetary terms, with the undersigned’s assistance by way of a 

continued Settlement Conference, if needed. The parties contemplate filing a joint motion to 

remove the case from the trial docket pending those additional settlement efforts. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 31st day of August, 2021. 

___________________________________ 

ALICIA M. OTAZO-REYES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

cc: United States District Judge Darrin P. Gayles 

Counsel of Record 

Case 1:20-cv-22901-DPG Document 93 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2021 Page 1 of 1
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEffects of airfoil shape, thickness, camber, and angle of attack on calculated transonic unsteady airloadsThe effects of airfoil shape, thickness, camber, and mean angle of attack on transonic unsteady airloads were investigated as calculated by the transonic small-disturbance computer code XTRAN2L. Shape effects were investigated by examining the pressure distributions, shock locations, and unsteady airloads for three 10 percent thick airfoils. NACA 0010, NACA 64A010, and parabolic arc. Thickness effects were determined by studying a single airfoil shape with three different thicknesses: NACA 0008, NACA 0010, and NACA 0012. Angle of attack and camber effects were studied by including mean angle of attack or by adding a simple parabolic camber distribution to the originally symmetric airfoils. Comparisons of unsteady airloads for different airfoil configurations show similar results caused by variations in airfoil shape, thickness, camber, or mean angle of attack. Computer costs can be reduced by limiting the number of transonic unsteady aerodynamic calculations for small changes in airfoil geometry or angle of attack.Document ID19850010648Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBatina, J. T.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1985Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberL-15786NAS 1.15:86320NASA-TM-86320Accession Number85N18957Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-33-43-09Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850010648.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Case 1:20-cv-23172-BB   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2020   Page 1 of 20

Case 1:20-cv-23172-BB   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2020   Page 2 of 20

Case 1:20-cv-23172-BB   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2020   Page 3 of 20

Case 1:20-cv-23172-BB   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2020   Page 4 of 20

Case 1:20-cv-23172-BB   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2020   Page 5 of 20

Case 1:20-cv-23172-BB   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2020   Page 6 of 20

Case 1:20-cv-23172-BB   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2020   Page 7 of 20

Case 1:20-cv-23172-BB   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2020   Page 8 of 20

Case 1:20-cv-23172-BB   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2020   Page 9 of 20

Case 1:20-cv-23172-BB   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2020   Page 10 of 20

Case 1:20-cv-23172-BB   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2020   Page 11 of 20

Case 1:20-cv-23172-BB   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2020   Page 12 of 20

Case 1:20-cv-23172-BB   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2020   Page 13 of 20

Case 1:20-cv-23172-BB   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2020   Page 14 of 20

Case 1:20-cv-23172-BB   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2020   Page 15 of 20

Case 1:20-cv-23172-BB   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2020   Page 16 of 20

Case 1:20-cv-23172-BB   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2020   Page 17 of 20

Case 1:20-cv-23172-BB   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2020   Page 18 of 20

Case 1:20-cv-23172-BB   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2020   Page 19 of 20

Case 1:20-cv-23172-BB   Document 1-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2020   Page 20 of 20
Docket FAA-2013-1024
§ 122.12 Operation of international airports. ( a ) *Entry, clearance and charges.* International airports are open to all aircraft for entry and clearance at no charge by Customs. However, charges may be assessed by the airport for commercial or private use of the airport.
( b ) *Servicing of aircraft.* When an aircraft enters or clears through an international airport, it shall be promptly serviced by airport personnel solely on the basis of order of arrival or readiness for departure. Servicing charges imposed by the airport operators shall not be greater than the schedule of charges in effect at the airport in question.
( c ) *FAA rules; denial of permission to land* — ( 1 ) *Federal Aviation Administration.* International airports must follow and enforce any requirements for airport operations, including airport rules that are set out by the Federal Aviation Administration in 14 CFR part 91.
( 2 ) *Customs and Border Protection.* CBP, based on security or other risk assessments, may limit the locations where aircraft entering the United States from a foreign port or place may land. Consistent with § 122.32(a) of this Title, CBP has the authority to deny aircraft permission to land in the United States, based upon security or other risk assessments.
( 3 ) *Commercial aircraft.* Permission to land at an international airport may be denied to a commercial aircraft if advance electronic information for incoming foreign cargo aboard the aircraft has not been received as provided in § 122.48a except in the case of emergency or forced landings.
( 4 ) *Private Aircraft.* Permission to land at an international airport will be denied if the pilot of a private aircraft arriving from a foreign port or place fails to submit an electronic manifest and notice of arrival pursuant to § 122.22, except in the case of emergency or forced landings.
( d ) *Additional requirements.* Additional requirements may be put into effect at a particular airport as the needs of the Customs port served by the airport demand.
[T.D. 88-12, 53 FR 9292, Mar. 22, 1988, as amended by CBP Dec. 03-32, 68 FR 68170, Dec. 5, 2003; CBP Dec. 08-43, 73 FR 68309, Nov. 18, 2008]
### §95a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 95a was editorially reclassified as section 5506 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITS REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000895648
<NAME> GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          26,176
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,054,204
<DEPRECIATION>                                 280,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,927,368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,513,387
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          337,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,590
<OTHER-SE>                                     884,291
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,927,368
<SALES>                                        282,120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               282,120
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  151,859
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,090
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              70,507
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 65,410
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             65,410
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    44,636
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
        

</TABLE>
#### § 177.6 Withdrawal of ruling requests.

Any request for a ruling may be withdrawn by the person submitting it at any time before the issuance of a ruling letter or any other final disposition of the request. All correspondence, documents, and exhibits submitted in connection with the request will be retained in the Customs Service file and will not be returned. In addition, the Headquarters Office may forward to Customs Service field offices which have or may have jurisdiction over the transaction to which the ruling request relates, its views in regard to the transaction or the issues involved therein, as well as appropriate information derived from materials in the Customs Service file.

[T.D. 80-285, 45 FR 80105, Dec. 3, 1980]
§ 111.11 Basic requirements for a license. ( a ) *Individual.* In order to obtain a broker's license, an individual must: ( 1 ) Be a citizen of the United States on the date of submission of the application referred to in § 111.12(a) and not an officer or employee of the United States Government;
( 2 ) Attain the age of 21 prior to the date of submission of the application referred to in § 111.12(a);
( 3 ) Be of good moral character; and
( 4 ) Have established, by attaining a passing (75 percent or higher) grade on an examination taken within the 3-year period before submission of the application referred to in § 111.12(a), that he has sufficient knowledge of customs and related laws, regulations and procedures, bookkeeping, accounting, and all other appropriate matters to render valuable service to importers and exporters.
( b ) *Partnership.* In order to qualify for a broker's license, a partnership must have at least one member of the partnership who is a broker.
( c ) *Association or corporation.* In order to qualify for a broker's license, an association or corporation must: ( 1 ) Be empowered under its articles of association or articles of incorporation to transact customs business as a broker; and
( 2 ) Have at least one officer who is a broker.
[T.D. 00-17, 65 FR 13891, Mar. 15, 2000, as amended by CBP Dec. 17-05, 82 FR 29718, June 30, 2017]
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-02-006 March 12, 2002

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: opa2@nrc.gov 

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417 

 

NRC TO MEET WITH FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS

SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Florida Power & Light

Company officials on Tuesday, March 19, to discuss the results of NRC's annual assessment of safety

performance at the Turkey Point nuclear power plant.

The meeting will be held at 2:30 p.m. in the Turkey Point training center, adjacent to the plant. 

The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be available before the meeting is

adjourned to answer any questions. 

A letter sent from the NRCís Regional Administrator to FP&L, which addresses plant safety

performance during the previous year and forms the basis of the meeting discussion, is available from

the Region II Office of Public Affairs or on the NRC web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/tp_2001q4.pdf

Current information for the plant is available at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/TP3/tp3_chart.html for Unit 3 and 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/TP4/tp4_chart.html for Unit 4.

###
### §5351. Delivery of Daily Calendar

(a) None of the funds made available in any fiscal year may be used to deliver to the office of a Member of the House of Representatives (including a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to the Congress) a printed copy of the Daily Calendar of the House of Representatives which is prepared by the Clerk of the House of Representatives.

(b) This section shall apply with respect to fiscal year 2019 and each succeeding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 115–244, div. B, title I, §116, Sept. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 2930.)
#### § 175.0 Scope.

This part sets forth the procedures applicable to requests by domestic interested parties for the classification and rate of duty applicable to designated imported merchandise, and to petitions alleging that the appraised value is too low, that the classification is not correct, or that the proper rate of duty is not being assessed upon designated imported merchandise which is claimed to be similar to the class or kind of merchandise manufactured, produced, or wholesaled by the petitioner.

[T.D. 70-181, 35 FR 13432, Aug. 22, 1970, as amended by T.D. 80-271, 45 FR 75642, Nov. 17, 1980]
No. 12,612.

#### Mile High Mercantile Company et al. *v.*Capitol Life Insurance Company.

(21 P. [2d] 1118)

Decided May 8, 1933.

Mr. Oliver W. Toll, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Wm. E, Hutton, Mr. John F. Pierce, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed en banc without written opinion, Mr. Justice Hilliard and Mr. Justice Bouek not participating.