alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-097 June 16, 2000

NRC AMENDS REGULATIONS CLARIFYING

ANTITRUST INFORMATION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is amending its regulations to clarify that it will no longer

require owners of operating nuclear power plants to include antitrust information in license transfer

applications, eliminating duplication of a review performed by other federal and state agencies.

The Atomic Energy Act and NRC regulations provide that no nuclear power plant operating

license may be transferred, directly or indirectly, without Commission consent. NRC historically has

conducted antitrust reviews in connection with certain kinds of nuclear power plant license transfers.

As part of a review of a license transfer application submitted by two owners of the Wolf Creek

nuclear power plant in Kansas, the Commission examined its rules of practice and concluded that its

statutory mandate does not require an antitrust review in these circumstances. As a result, NRC will no

longer conduct antitrust reviews of license transfer applications submitted by the owners of operating

nuclear power plants.

As a result of the change, parties submitting a license transfer application to NRC for an

operating nuclear power plant will not be required to include antitrust information. The antitrust

review is performed by other agencies, including, as appropriate, the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission, Department of Justice, and the Federal Trade

Commission, as well as state public utility commissions. NRC will continue to conduct all other

aspects of its review of nuclear power plant license transfer applications to ensure, among other

matters, that prospective owners meet financial qualifications and decommissioning funding assurance

requirements.

A proposed rule on this subject was issued in The Federal Register for public comment on

November 3, 1999. The Commission received comments from seven organizations, including

licensees, the Nuclear Energy Institute and public citizen groups. The Citizens Awareness Network,

Inc., and a group including the American Antitrust Institute oppose the rule in its entirety. All of the

other parties support the Commission initiative to clarify its regulations in this area.

The final rule will be issued in an upcoming edition of The Federal Register and will become

effective 30 days from publication.

##
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of OMNI Energy Services Corp. on Forms S-8 (No. 333-126679,No. 333-110198, No. 333-49409, No. 333-80973 and No. 333-35816), pertaining to the incentive plans of OMNI Energy Services Corp., and Form S-3 (No. 333-131696) pertaining to a shelf registration, of our report datedMarch 13, 2009, except for Note 2 for which the date is August 26, 2010 and Note 12 for which the date is March 31, 2010, with respect to the consolidated Balance Sheet of OMNI Energy Services Corp. as of December 31, 2008 andthe Consolidated Statements of Operations, Stockholders’ Equity and Cash Flows for the two years then ended, appearing in the Amendment No. 1 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/ PANNELL KERR FORSTER OF TEXAS, P.C. 

Houston, Texas 

August 26, 2010
### §1943. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–145, §6(b), Mar. 4, 2010, 124 Stat. 54

Section, R.S. §1825, required members of the Capitol police to pay for their own uniforms.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 211 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.

R.S. §1825 derived from act July 20, 1868, ch. 176, §1, 15 Stat. 94.
Exhibit99(B)

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATIONANNUALCOMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE SALE ANDSERVICING AGREEMENT

I, Paul Honda, do hereby certify that Iam the Assistant Vice President, Assistant Secretary and ComplianceOfficer of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation(the ‘‘Company’’), and further certify onbehalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the‘‘Servicer’’) under the Sale and ServicingAgreement (the ‘‘Agreement’’) dated as ofJune  1, 2005 among the Servicer, American Honda ReceivablesCorp., as Seller and Honda Auto Receivables 2005-3 Owner Trust asfollows:

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (i)  | A review of the activitiesof the Servicer during the 9-month period ended March 31, 2006, and ofits performance under the Agreement has been made under mysupervision; |

|  |            |                                                                                                                                                                  |
|--|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (ii)  | To the best of myknowledge and information, based upon such review, the Servicer hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout suchperiod; and |

|  |             |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--|-------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (iii)  | To the best of myknowledge and information, no event of default nor any event which withthe giving of notice or lapse of time, or both, would become an eventof default under the Agreement, has occurred or iscontinuing. |

This certificate is being delivered to the Trusteepursuant to Section 3.11 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement effectiveJune  1,  2005, which terms and conditions are incorporatedin the Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto setmy hand this 26th day of May,2006

|                                                                  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/Paul C. Honda                                                 |
| Paul C.Honda                                                     |
| Assistant Vice President,AssistantSecretary andComplianceOfficer |
|                                                                  |

----
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-047 April 24, 2001

COMMISSIONER DICUS HONORED

BY TEXAS WOMAN’S UNIVERSITY

Commissioner Greta Joy Dicus, who has served on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission since

1996 both as a Commissioner and as Chairman, has been named a Distinguished Alumna of Texas

Woman’s University, her alma mater.

Commissioner Dicus was one of four alumnae so honored in ceremonies at the university in

Denton, Texas, on April 19, where she delivered an address at the Honors Convocation.

She was cited, among other accomplishments, for her distinguished service at the NRC where

she is now in her second term; for being the second of only three women named to the Main

Commission of the International Commission on Radiological Protection; and as a researcher who for

12 years studied radiation health effects at Harvard Medical School, Rice University and the University

of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.

Commissioner Dicus began her NRC service on February 15, 1996. She served as Chairman

from July 1-October 29,1999. Her current term extends until June 30, 2003.

The Commissioner graduated with a Bachelor of Arts degree in biological sciences from Texas

Woman’s University in 1961 and earned a Master of Arts degree from the University of Texas

Southwestern Medical School in 1967.

###
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF HYPERCOM CORPORATION
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I certify that: (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2003 of Hypercom Corporation (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hypercom
Corporation.

                                                    By: /s/ C. S. Alexander
                                                    -------------------------
                                                    Christopher S. Alexander
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    March 15, 2004
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-067 April 18, 2000

NOTE TO EDITORS: NAME CHANGE FOR OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS

The NRC’s Office of State Programs has changed its name to the Office of State and Tribal

Programs. The new name reflects heightened tribal government interest in multiple areas of NRC

jurisdiction, including high-level radioactive waste transportation and disposal, uranium recovery,

reactor operations, and dry cask storage. The office will be the primary contact for state and tribal

governments regarding NRC’s regulatory policies and issues.

Paul H. Lohaus, Director of the office, can be reached at 301-415-3340.

###
#### Dragoon Realty Corporation, Respondent, v. Abe M. Hirsch et al., Doing Business under the Name of Normandie Showroom Service Co., et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag) JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93021, Dec. 20, 2016.

§ 151.82 Information on invoices. Invoices of cotton provided for in subheading 5201.00.10, 5201.00.20, 5201.00.50, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202), shall show the following detailed information in addition to other required information: ( a ) One of the following statements regarding each lot of cotton covered by the invoice: ( 1 ) This is harsh or rough cotton under 19.05 millimeters in staple length;
( 2 ) The staple length of this cotton is under 28.58 millimeters. (This statement is not to be used if paragraph (a)(1) of this section is applicable);
( 3 ) The staple length of this cotton is 28.58 millimeters or more and under 34.93 millimeters;
( 4 ) This cotton is harsh or rough cotton (other than cotton of perished staple, and cotton pickings), white in color, and has a staple length of 29.37 millimeters or more and under 44.45 millimeters;
( 5 ) The staple length of this cotton is 34.93 millimeters or more and under 42.86 millimeters; or
( 6 ) The staple length of this cotton is 42.86 millimeters or more.
( b ) The name of the country of origin and, if practicable, the name of the province or other subdivision of the country of origin in which the cotton was grown.
( c ) The variety of the cotton, such as Karnak, Gisha, Pima, Tanguis, etc.
[T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51269, Dec. 21, 1988]
#### 245 East 37th Street, Inc., Respondent, v. Fireman’s Fund Indemnity Co., Appellant.

Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.; Mac-Crate, J., not voting. [See *ante,*p. 713.]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 198 (Thursday, October 14, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 61045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23055]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated March 29, 2004, and published in the Federal 
Register on April 29, 2004, (69 FR 23537-23538), Cody Laboratories, 
Inc., 601 Yellowstone Avenue, Cody, Wyoming 82414, made application by 
letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as 
a bulk manufacturer of Cocaine (9041), a basic class of controlled 
substance in Schedule II.
    The company plans to manufacture the product in bulk to distribute 
to its customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Cody Laboratories, Inc. to manufacture the basic class of controlled 
substance listed is consistent with the public interest at this time. 
DEA has investigated Cody Laboratories, Inc. to ensure that the 
company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The 
investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 
21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a 
bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed.

    Dated: September 28, 2004.
William J. Walker,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-23055 Filed 10-13-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-227 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Wednesday, December 23, 1998)

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has

scheduled a meeting of its subcommittee on reliability and probabilistic risk assessment on

January 21, in Rockville, Maryland.

The subcommittee will meet at 1:00 p.m. in Room T-2B3 of the NRC’s Two White Flint

North Building at 11545 Rockville Pike. It will continue its review of proposed options to make

10 CFR 50.59 (procedures for licensees to make certain changes to their facilities, and conduct

tests and experiments without prior NRC approval) risk-informed.

Other aspects of the meeting, including an opportunity for public comment, will be

described in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

###
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors of Midas, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Nos. 333-44625, 333-58363, 333-74094, 333-89226, 333-105458, 333-101559,333-128503, 333-42196, 333-44797) on Form S-8 and the Registration Statement (No. 333-105458) on Form S-3 of Midas, Inc. of our reports dated March 20, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Midas, Inc. as of the end of fiscalyears 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and changes in shareholders’ equity for each of the fiscal years 2008, 2007, and 2006, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting asof January 3, 2009, which reports appear in the annual report on Form 10-K of Midas, Inc. for the fiscal year end 2008. 

Our report onthe consolidated financial statements refers to Midas, Inc.’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” and Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R) in 2006. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

March 20, 2009
#### § 176.22 Deletion of protest or entry number.

If any protest number or entry number is to be deleted from a schedule of protest numbers or entry numbers attached to or embodied in a statement of agreed facts, a line shall be drawn through the number and the change shall be initialed by the authorized official making and approving the deletion.

[T.D. 70-181, 35 FR 13433, Aug. 22, 1970]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Louis Lozea, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-029 June 7, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH NORTH ATLANTIC ENERGY SERVICE CORPORATION

TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE AT SEABROOK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of North Atlantic Energy

Service Corporation on Thursday, June 14, to discuss the results of the agencyís annual assessment of

safety performance at the Seabrook nuclear power plant.

 The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 1 p.m. in

the Science and Nature Center at the plant, located on Lafayette Road in Seabrook, N.H. NRC

officials will be available afterwards to answer questions.

 The performance period to be discussed is April 1, 2000, to March 31, 2001. Overall, the NRC

found that the plant operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and fully met all

cornerstone objectives during the period. A letter sent from the NRC Region I office to North Atlantic

Energy Service Corporation addresses plant performance during the period and will serve as the basis

for the meeting discussion. It is available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/OPA/ppr/seabrook_eoc2001.pdf

 Current performance information for the Seabrook plant is available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SEAB1/seab1_chart.html

 ###
§ 128.12 Application approval/denial and suspension of operating privileges. ( a ) *Notice.* ( 1 ) The port director shall promptly notify the applicant in writing of the decision to approve or deny the application to establish an express consignment carrier or hub facility or to suspend or revoke operating privileges at an existing facility.
( 2 ) The notice shall specifically state the grounds for denial or for the proposed suspension or revocation.
( b ) *Appeal.* The express consignment entity may file a written notice of appeal seeking review of the denial or proposed suspension or revocation within 30 days after notification.
( c ) *Recommendation.* The port director shall consider the allegations and responses in the appeal unless, in the case of a suspension or revocation, the express consignment entity requests a hearing. The appeal along with the port director's recommendation shall be forwarded to the Commissioner of Customs or his designee for a final administrative decision.
( d ) *Hearing.* In the case of a proposed suspension or revocation, a hearing may be requested within 30 days after notification. If a hearing is requested, it shall be held before a hearing officer appointed by the Commissioner of Customs or his designee within 30 days following the express consignment entity's request. The entity shall be notified of the time and place of the hearing at least 5 days prior thereto. The express consignment entity may be represented by counsel at such hearing, and all evidence and testimony of witnesses in such proceedings, including substantiation of the allegations and the responses thereto shall be presented, with the right of cross-examination to both parties. A stenographic record of any such proceeding shall be made and a copy thereof shall be delivered to the express consignment entity. At the conclusion of the hearing, all papers and the stenographic record of the hearing shall promptly be transmitted to the Commissioner of Customs or his designee together with a recommendation for final action. The express consignment entity may submit in writing additional views or arguments to the Commissioner or his designee following a hearing on the basis of the stenographic record, within 10 days after delivery to it of a copy of such record. The Commissioner or his designee shall thereafter render the decision in writing, stating the reasons therefor. Such decision shall be served on the express consignment entity, and shall be considered the final administrative action.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in thefollowing Registration Statements of OMNI Energy Services Corp. on Forms S-8 (No. 333-126679, No. 333-110198, No. 333-49409, No. 333-80973 and No. 333-35816), pertaining to the incentive plans of OMNI Energy Services Corp., andForm S-1 (No. 333-131696) pertaining to the shelf registration with Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC, of our report dated March 16, 2007, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of OMNI Energy Services Corp. for the year ended December 31,2006. 

/s/ Pannell Kerr Forster of Texas, P.C. 

Houston, Texas 

March 16, 2007
#### § 111.74 Decision and notice of suspension or revocation or monetary penalty.

If the Executive Assistant Commissioner finds that one or more of the charges in the statement of charges is not sufficiently proved, the suspension, revocation, or monetary penalty action may be based on any remaining charges if the facts alleged in the charges are established by the evidence. If the Executive Assistant Commissioner in the exercise of discretion and based solely on the record, issues an order suspending a broker's license or permit for a specified period of time or revoking a broker's license or permit or, except in a case described in § 111.53(b)(3), assessing a monetary penalty in lieu of suspension or revocation, the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade, will promptly provide written notification of the order to the broker and, unless an appeal from the order of the Executive Assistant Commissioner is filed by the broker (*see* § 111.75), the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade, will publish a notice of the suspension or revocation, or the assessment of a monetary penalty, in the Federal Register. If no appeal from the order of the Executive Assistant Commissioner is filed, an order of suspension or revocation or assessment of a monetary penalty will become effective sixty (60) calendar days after issuance of written notification of the order unless the Executive Assistant Commissioner finds that a more immediate effective date is in the national or public interest. If a monetary penalty is assessed and no appeal from the order of the Executive Assistant Commissioner is filed, payment of the penalty must be tendered within sixty (60) calendar days after the effective date of the order, and, if payment is not tendered within that sixty (60)-day period, the license or permit of the broker will immediately be suspended until payment is made.

[CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63320, Oct. 18, 2022]